I think the economic numbers are rigged -- the gov't trying to bring some confidence back into the mkts.  I'm scaring myself, starting to sound like my dad w/ all of his conspiracy theories.

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Fenner, Chet
Subject: RE: A PREVIEW OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

thoughts on the stock market?

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 9:20 AM
To: 'Joe Parks'; Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: A PREVIEW OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

Oh, this will be good!

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Parks [mailto:jparks1@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:42 PM
To: chet_fenner@bmc.com
Subject: A PREVIEW OF COMING ATTRACTIONS

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


STEVE KEAN -  will be calling in.

If possible, can I get the call in number and passcode by close of business
Friday - Steve will leave for business on Sunday.     Thanks.

      Maureen

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  ____X___

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
September 22.

Thank you,
Sherri


tTO: Mark E. Haedicke
FROM: Mark Whitney, CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net  REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

Computers take the elbow grease out of legal research, but they have driven
subscription prices through the roof. Why? In our opinion, hegemony and
Passive User Licensing Schemes, which calculate subscription fees AS THOUGH
everyone in the firm is a user, even when they are not.

How cool would it be to have a database subscription business comprised in
part of subscribers who never actually use your database? We can't tell you
because TheLaw.net licenses only active users.

--"SO HOW MANY LAWYERS ARE IN YOUR ORGANIZATION?"

Who cares? Not us. Let's talk "All You Can Eat" for Active Users only:

----One = $395 annually for TheLaw.net Pro Convenience Edition; $345 if you
subscribe in April. Save $50!
----Two = $575 annually for TheLaw.net Pro Small Office Special
----Five = $1195 annually for TheLaw.net Pro Workgroup Edition
----Searchable Case Law: 72 libraries spanning over 175 Federal and state
jurisdictions
----Plus, more than 50,000 menu driven deep-links to critical web based
documents and databases
----Cf. The Two Headed Monster:
------ http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm
------ http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm
----References and Reviews: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm
----Tutorials: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm
----Guarantee: 30 Days. Unconditional. Full Refund.
----Subscribe Online: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
----Paralegals, librarians and backoffice staff are on us
----Conduct real legal research with a seamless national scope
----All subscribers install at work, at home and on their laptops
----No passwords or user names
----Unlimited tech and reference attorney aftercare
----No CDs to chase around the office
----No gamesmanship

--ALL YOU CAN EAT 24-7-365 WITH A NATIONAL SCOPE

You can pay a lot of money for a little slice or you can pay a little bit for
a national scope. The latter is where we come in and it's a great model.

You see at TheLaw.net we don't lard up the payroll by developing bells and
whistles that most people rarely use and many find overwhelming. Instead, we
deliver a large amount of serviceable, authoritative data to your desktop in
a way that is fast and easy for anyone to understand and use. We're talking
minutes.

--SAY GOODBYE TO AVAILABILITY PROBLEMS

Small to medium environments have an availability problem. Or, should we say,
lack of availability. The vastness of West and Lexis' collections may be
unavailable to you because the cost is prohibitive. You know there's a lot of
useful, authoritative data online, but that also is unavailable because you
don't have the time to find it. You need a best practices software solution
in place to leverage this information on behalf of your online law office; a
tool that also includes a great proprietary database as its core.

--WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW TO BE SUCCESSFUL?

If you know electronic case law research and you know how to run a browser
and shuttle through menus, you are a Power User in waiting. And, of course,
these days they make it so easy to cherry pick specialized resources from
their pay-to-play web sites that the days of annual contracts and contending
with the management issues that arise from clicking outside The Plan may be
numbered. It's a simple matter of knowing your options and tweaking your
relationships accordingly.

Further, our subscribers will tell you that with over four million searchable
cases, browsable and searchable Federal and state statutes, rules,
regulations (including the CFR and Federal Register), forms, executive agency
databases, legislative tracking tools, practice area helpers, nearly 1,000
news resources, your favorite columnists, and a host of law office
facilitators all just a click or two away on their desktop, they are saving
more than money, they are saving time, too.

--LET'S GET STARTED. SUBSCRIBE THIS WEEK AND SAVE!

Subscribe this week and take $50 off TheLaw.net Convenience Edition. Install
at work, at home and on your laptop. We can have you up and running later
today wherever you are on earth. Better yet, sign up your partner and
yourself or a workgroup.

Imagine. No surprises. No meters. No printing, downloading, pay-per-view or
on-demand fees. In short, none of the gamesmanship you have come to expect
and never appreciated.

At your option, we can build your packages and deliver them today via our web
site or we can ship CDs via U.S. Priority Mail or FedEx. We thank you for
your time and we hope to hear from you soon while the April savings last!

Regards,

MARK WHITNEY
CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
Chicago - San Diego, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)

******************************************

CASES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE AND YEAR OF ORIGIN
-----Sorted in Order of Federal Circuit
---------See also, http://www.thelaw.net/compare.htm

--United States Supreme Court 1900
--Federal Circuit 1982
--U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit 1950

FIRST FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 1930
--Maine Supreme Judicial Court 1996
--Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1930
--Massachusetts Appeals Court 1930
--New Hampshire Supreme Court 1930
--Rhode Island Supreme Court 1950

SECOND FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 1930
--Connecticut Supreme Court 1950
--Connecticut Appellate Court 1950
--New York Court of Appeals 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 2nd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 3rd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 4th Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 2nd Dept. 1955
--Vermont Supreme Court 1930

THIRD FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, New Jersey 1999
--New Jersey Supreme Court 1930
--New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Eastern, Pennsylvania 1997
--Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Superior Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 1950

FOURTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, Maryland 1999
--Maryland Court of Appeals 1950
--Maryland Special Court of Appeals 1950
--North Carolina Supreme Court 1945
--North Carolina Court of Appeals 1968
--U.S. District Court, South Carolina 1999
--South Carolina Supreme Court 1996
--South Carolina Court of Appeals 1996
--Virginia Supreme Court 1930
--Virginia Court of Appeals 1930
--West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals 1991

FIFTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 1930
--Louisiana Supreme Court 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1980
--U.S. District Court, Northern, Mississippi 1997
--Mississippi Supreme Court 1994
--Mississippi Court of Appeals 1994
--Texas Supreme Court 1950
--Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950

SIXTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 1930
--Kentucky Supreme Court 1945
--Kentucky Court of Appeals 1945
--Michigan Supreme Court 1930
--Michigan Court of Appeals 1965
--Ohio Supreme Court 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District 1950
--Tennessee Supreme Court 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950

SEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 1930
--Illinois Supreme Court 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District 1985
--Indiana Supreme Court 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District 1940
--Indiana Tax Court 1986
--Wisconsin Supreme Court 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV 1945

EIGHTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 1930
--Arkansas Supreme Court 1957
--Arkansas Court of Appeals 1957
--Iowa Supreme Court 1995
--Iowa Court of Appeals 1995
--Minnesota Supreme Court 1930
--Minnesota Court of Appeals 1983
--Missouri Supreme Court 1960
--Missouri Court of Appeals 1960
--Nebraska Supreme Court 1965
--Nebraska Court of Appeals 1965
--U.S. District Court, North Dakota 1999
--North Dakota Supreme Court 1930
--North Dakota Court of Appeals 1930
--South Dakota Supreme Court 1965

NINTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1941
--Alaska Supreme Court 1960
--Alaska Court of Appeals 1960
--Arizona Supreme Court 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Central, California 1998
--California Supreme Court 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 1944
--California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District 1944
--California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate District 1944
--California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District 1944
--California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate District 1944
--California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate District 1944
--Hawaii Supreme Court 1930
--Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 1930
--Idaho Supreme Court 1965
--Idaho Court of Appeals 1965
--Montana Supreme Court 1993
--Nevada Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Court of Appeals 1950
--Washington Supreme Court 1935
--Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division 1969

TENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit 1930
--Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
--Colorado Supreme Court 1930
--Colorado Court of Appeals 1930
--Kansas Supreme Court 1982
--Kansas Court of Appeals 1982
--New Mexico Supreme Court 1930
--New Mexico Court of Appeals 1930
--Oklahoma Supreme Court 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Appeals 1994
--Utah Supreme Court 1950
--Utah Court of Appeals 1950
--Wyoming Supreme Court 1993

ELEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit 1981
--Alabama Supreme Court 1955
--Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 1955
--Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals 1955
--Florida Supreme Court 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District 1950
--Georgia Supreme Court 1940
--Georgia Court of Appeals 1940

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy
professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to
remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the
email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll
free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy
Statement".
*****************************************************************

West is a registered trademark of West Group. Lexis is a registered trademark
of LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.


Janie:  I prepared a format last week for Allegheny for use until the ISDA
Master Agreement is executed.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 10:53 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	04/05/2001 02:46 PM

		 To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Allegheny sample confirmation draft

Kim:  It looks fine, and, you should use this format until the ISDA is
executed.  We spoke with Allegheny this morning and they promise to execute
next week.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
	04/05/2001 12:45 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Allegheny sample confirmation draft

Hi Sara,
Attached are the changes you requested.  Shall I begin confirming all
Allegheny deals on this form until the ISDA is complete?

Thanks for your help!
Kimberly Hundl x31647

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/04/2001 06:58 PM
To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Allegheny sample confirmation draft

Kim:

Attached are my comments.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
	04/04/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Allegheny sample confirmation draft

Hi Sara,
Ok, I think I have properly referenced the side letter in this confirmation.
Please let me know what changes should be made.

P.S. I am leaving at noon today, so if I haven't heard from you by then, I
will give you a call tomorrow morning.
Thanks!
Kim x31647


Welcome back EvMBAs. Hopefully you've all acclimated after a couple of weeks or more of classes. To the first years:  Rumors of students voted off in Weakest Link style with Diane stepping in as Anne Robinson, are simply unfounded, or are they . . . ?  I am a 2nd year student, as well as hopefully your ever so resourceful Career Center liaison. What this translates to is the following:  I work with John Morel, Associate Director of the Career Center and the EvMBA and Alumni Career Advisor to serve your career-related needs. Of course, there is one caveat:  I get first dibs on job postings.

Anyway, thanks to feedback from you last year, I've prepared a charter with which to drive my initiatives this academic year.

1. Resume directories. Although there are no plans in the near future to produce an exclusive EvMBA resume book, there are several student MBA clubs that are gearing up for their releases and welcome inclusions from EvMBA students. I'm unsure of all the fees and some do require that you are or become a member. E-mail me back if you would like a list of groups with contacts offering resume books.

2. Networking events (on-campus and off-site).  I will be working with the account managers from the Recruitment Center as well as other members of the EVMBA Association in arranging company presentations, alumni speakers addressing particular career fields, in addition to co-sponsored events w/full time MBAs this upcoming year. Contact me if you have any ideas.

3. On-campus recruitment. Just a reminder that you are only eligible for on-campus recruitment the academic year in which you graduate.  In other words, if you are planning to graduate in December 2002 or May 2003, you are eligible to participate starting Fall 2002. Of course, that's not to say that you cannot tap into the resources of the Career Center (including John's time) at anytime of your 3-year stay at Haas.

4. Career-related seminars.  In the near future, John will offer forums pertaining to strategies on getting promoted or transferred, life/work/school balance, a panel of headhunters, during the break seminars on resume updates, interview coaching, salary negotiations and networking strategies.

Furthermore, you should have received in your mail box in the MBA Lounge last week a list of events from the Managing Your Career Workshop Series, which deals with career exploration in investment banking and consulting and interview preparation, just to name a few.  These are mainly targeting the full-time students and you are encouraged to attend if you calendar permits.

NOTE:  Unlike previous years, you will have to log on to Bear Tracks (http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/intranet/) to RSVP these seminars. If you were not available to attend BearTracks training this week (log in using your student ID and the password is the word password), directions can also be found in the Career Center.   Speaking of which, I'll have a table in the Bank of America forum during our breaks on Sep. 11, 12 and 13, during which this handout will be available, as well as all sorts of other career info. Also, I'll be there to answer questions or discuss ideas you might have.

 5. Other useful tidbits.

 - Don't forget to report placement information if you have recently been promoted or changed jobs, either internally or externally.  Again report this information on the EveMBA placement form in BearTracks.

- Subscribe to alumnijobs@haas on majordomo to receive weekly emails of job opportunities sent by companies or fellow alumni interesting in hiring not only alumni, but also experienced EvMBA students.

Here's how:

  i. Send an email to majordomo@haas.berkeley.edu.

 ii. Leave subject line blank.

 iii. In the message area, type "subscribe alumnijobs@haas"

 iv. Send your message.

 - I'll be scheduling a couple of brown bag sessions in the fall to solicit additional input on a few of these topics. The next brown bag will be either Tuesday, Oct. 9 or the following day on Oct. 10. As usual, grub and drinks as well as free access to John's minibar are offered as an enticement.

 Have a great year and see you soon,

 Albert Demery

demery@haas.berkeley.edu


We've received a personal invitation to a NYMEX  Crawfish Boil on April 3 at
5:00 at Garden in the Heights at 3926 Feagan.  The cause of this celebration
is the 10th anniversary of the Nat Gas futures contract.  It would be nice if
Shankman and John Arnold could attend.  Perhaps you can give them a personal
invitation...


This must be the day,  I am looking for a  Consent to Assignment for Southern
Company Energy Marketing.  The consent is for  a GISB dated 12/97. Global
number 96029029.
I did not see it in Live Link.

Thanks for your help.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


What's up rude-dog.  Haven't heard any new recruiting news.  I think it is
going to be quiet on that front until later in the football season.

I was up in Denver this past week and talked to Jessica Wentworth.  She said
you have been exploring the Australian countryside.  Bet there is some
amazing stuff down under.  Anyway, drop me a note and let me know how its
going.

I know I have asked this before, but when are you getting into town?  We need
to have some repatriation beers upon your arrival.


Back by 4:30?
--------------------------
Rick S.


Date 8/28/00
Time 04:45 PM
**How2DoIt.net Order Confirmation **
Order No: 001014

Billing Information
 First Name     : Mark
 Last Name      : Taylor
 Company        : Enron
 Address        : 1400 Smith Street
 Address 2      : EB3889
 City           : Houston
 State/Province : TX
 Zip            : 77002
 Country        : USA
 Phone          : 713-853-7459
 Fax            :
 E-mail         : mark.taylor@enron.com
 Comment        :

 Payment Method    : American Express
 Call For CC Num   :

 Qty  Part No   Name            Options  Price  Total
 ---  --------  --------------  -------  -----  -----
   1  FUN-7-ME  FUN-ICS French           $3.99  $3.99

Sub Total     : $3.99
Shipping Type :   UPS
Shipping      : $4.95
Tax           : $0.00
Total         : $8.94
------------------------------------
Shopping cart powered by Cart32 at http://www.cart32.com


When: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:30 AM-9:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3907

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss certain issues regarding Equity AFUDC Gross-Up and Ramp-Up accounting on Co. 0536.  I have attached a tentative list of topics to be discussed.


Thanks to all of you, Enron North America has had an outstanding year in
2000.  Some of the more notable accomplishments include:
a) 100% plus increase in EBIT from 1999 actuals to 2000 forecast;
b) significant rationalization of the balance sheet including the sale of the
(i) Wind River/Powder River gathering assets, (ii) East Coast Power
generating assets, (iii) HPL and (iv) five of the six Eastern Peakers;
c) ENA is the leading energy merchant by a factor of two;
d) physical electricity volume grew by 34% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
e) natural gas volumes grew by 82% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
f) 500% growth in daily transactions from November 1999 to November 2000 due
to the highly successful Enron OnLine distribution channel; and
g) ENA reaching its 25% ROCE target.

These are truly outstanding accomplishments and our expectations for growth
and opportunity in Enron North America for 2001 are consistent with that
success.  In order to reach these goals, we felt it necessary to re-align a
number of our organizations. A number of these changes are completed.  The
goals of such re-alignment include:
a) increase overall productivity with the goal to ensure that every employee
is in a position to contribute regardless of skill set;
b) increase overall market coverage, deal flow and information generation
with the goal to increase bid/offer income, increase the velocity of deal
flow, improve customer coverage and promote quality information transfer to
our trading organization;
c) increase deal quality and earnings quality with the goal to (i) allocate
our resources towards the best transactions and (ii) significantly increase
our &mid-market8 originated transactions in our portfolio;
d) promote real time decision making and a closer tie between our trading and
origination (mid-market and structured) organizations in order to better
align those functions to reduce the amount of un-productive internal focus;
e) increase the overall velocity of the capital being utilized consistent
with our goal of a 25% plus return on capital employed; and
f) identify and recognize a host of new leaders in the organization that are
critical to meeting our goals next year.

With these objectives in mind, patterned after the successful business models
in Calgary and Portland, effective immediately the following changes are
being implemented:
a) East Power ) a single East Power Team incorporating trading, mid-market
and origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Kevin Presto and
Janet Dietrich who will report to the Enron Americas - Office of the Chairman
(EA OOC).  This team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions.  Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern power markets. The team will be responsible for covering the IOU,s,
muni,s/co-ops, industrials and IPP,s and will utilize all ENA,s product
capabilities including the power commodity, assets and capital. The team will
further be broken down into several key strategic regions and business units
including:
  (i) ERCOT ) managed by Doug Gilbert Smith and Bruce Sukaly;
  (ii) NE ) managed by Dana Davis and Jeff Ader;
  (iii) Midwest ) managed by Fletch Sturm and Ed Baughman;
  (iv) SE ) managed by Rogers Herndon and Ozzie Pagan;
  (v) East Power Development ) managed by Ben Jacoby;
  (vi) East Power Structuring  - managed by Bernie Aucoin; and
  (vii) East Power Fundamentals and the &Genco8 ) managed by Lloyd Will

b) West Power ) there will be no changes to the Portland office which is
managed by Tim Belden and Chris Calger .  Both Tim and Chris will continue to
report to the EA OOC.
c) Canada and Mexico ) there will be no changes to the Canadian or Mexican
offices which are managed by Rob Milnthorp and Max Yzaguirre respectively.
Both Rob and Max will continue to report to the EA OOC.
d) U.S. Natural Gas ) there are several changes anticipated in this business
consistent with the goals and objectives described above. The changes
primarily affect the East, Central, West and Texas gas regions. Each region
will consist of a single gas team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination. Each team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions. Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern, Western, Central and Texas gas markets.  The team will be
responsible for covering the LDC,s, muni,s/co-ops, industrials, IOU,s, IPP,s
and the producers.  There will be an increasing focus on the upstream side of
the business including the producers, transporters and storage providers in
addition to market area opportunities. The team will utilize all of ENA,s
product capabilities including the gas commodity, assets and capital. Each of
these groups will report directly to the EA OOC;
East Gas ) a single East Gas Team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Scott Neal and Frank
Vickers who will be returning from Portland to join this team.
West Gas  ) in a similar manner, a West Gas Team will be formed co-managed by
Phillip Allen and Barry Tycholiz, who will be joining us in Houston from the
Canadian team. The Denver office under Mark Whitt will be integrated under
this team.
Central Gas )  in a similar manner, a Central Gas Team will be formed
co-managed by Hunter Shively and Laura Luce. The Chicago office will be
integrated into this team.
Texas Gas ) the Texas Gas Team will be managed by Tom Martin. This team will
continue to manage the gas trading business around HPL until the pending sale
is concluded in Q2 2001.  After the sale of HPL, this team will build a Texas
gas business without ownership of the HPL assets.
Financial ) this group will continue to be managed by John Arnold with no
significant changes.
Derivatives ) this group, lead by Fred Lagrasta, will offer derivative and
financial mid-market products and services to the natural gas market
specifically targeting CFO,s and treasury departments.  Fred will continue to
maintain certain existing mid-market accounts with a number of producer and
industrial accounts where relationships are well formed. Otherwise,
mid-market coverage will gravitate to the regions. The New York office gas
marketing efforts will continue to be managed by Fred.
Upstream Products ) this group, lead by Jean Mrha, will develop several
distinct product offerings for the upstream segment of the gas market.  This
group will develop and market the product in conjunction with the regions.
This is consistent with our desire to have a broader product offering and
greater market penetration in the upstream segment.  These products include
producer outsourcing, similar to our successful Petro-Canada and Suncor
relationships in Canada, physical storage re-engineering, compressor
services, wellhead liquidity products and offshore asset and capital
products.  In addition, Jean will manage our Bridgeline joint venture with
Texaco.
Gas Structuring ) this group will be lead by Ed McMichael, reporting to Frank
Vickers, will provide structuring and deal support to all the gas teams.
Gas Fundamentals ) this group will be lead by Chris Gaskill, reporting to
Hunter Shively, will provide fundamentals to all the gas teams.

Julie Gomez will continue to support the gas floor through several identified
projects including long-term supply/demand analysis and, natural gas
transportation capacity trading opportunities.

There is an expectation of some customer overlap between the gas and power
groups; for example, the combination utilities and the IPP,s.  The teams will
coordinate with regard to the combination utilities like Con. Edison or
PG&E.  With regard to the IPP,s, to the extent that the product offering
involves an underlying power position, the power teams will manage. We have
asked Janet Dietrich to coordinate such overlaps between the two
organizations in Houston.

e) Technical/Restructuring - In the effort to consolidate and centralize our
technical resources (engineering, development, operations, pipeline) to
ensure that this skill base is available to all ENA groups and utilized
productively across the organization, Brian Redmond will form and manage the
Technical Services Group.  This group will manage ENA,s technical risks and
will provide, on a cost basis, technical services for the entire ENA
organization. This group will manage the interface with EE&CC and OEC.  In
addition, the Restructuring Group, currently managed by Dick Lydecker, will
report to Brian Redmond.  This group is currently monetizing a large portion
of the merchant investment portfolio given our current strategies.  This
group will have continuing responsibility to manage troubled commodity and
capital transactions that need considerable time and attention to manage risk
and monetize.

In addition to these responsibilities, Brian will manage the pending sale and
transition of the HPL asset over the next couple quarters as regulatory and
securities approvals are obtained in order to complete the sale.  Brian will
report to the EA OOC.

f) Principal Investing  )  with the departure of Jeff Donahue to new
opportunities in EBS, ENA,s venture capital function will be managed by
Michael L. Miller.  This group makes small investments in distributed
generation, power quality and technology companies that can benefit from
Enron,s distribution channels and expertise.  Michael will report to the EA
OOC.

g) Corporate Development ) Tim Detmering will assume the corporate
development responsibilities for ENA as Jeff transitions to his new role and
will report to the EA OOC.

h) Generation Investments ) there will be no changes to this group managed by
Dave Duran. Dave will continue to report to the EA OOC.

i) Energy Capital Resources ) there will be no changes to this group
currently lead by C. John Thompson and Scott Josey.  John and Scott will
continue to report to the EA OOC.

As a final note in the interest of keeping things simple, Enron Americas will
have two operating divisions  - Enron North America and Enron South America.
As a result, we will continue to conduct business under these two operating
companies; therefore, eliminating the need to change legal entities et al.
If you are currently a commercial employee of ENA or ESA you will continue to
conduct business in that company.

We look forward to another exciting year in the North American energy
market.  This is certainly a company unrivaled in the marketplace with the
most talented employees.  The opportunities are endless.  We wish you and
your family a very happy and safe holiday season.


Just thought it would be a nice idea if you knew who you were talking to in
the Houston office.

Left to right: Kimberly Hundl, Stephanie Piwetz, Kimberly Indelicato, not an
EPMI employee & Amy Heffernan

Have a great day!

KI


Sara - apologies - I thought my original mail to yourself and Jeff
explained.  I would be grateful if you could have this couriered today.  I
attach my original mail for convenience.

many tks,

Denis

Denis O'Connell
21/02/2001 18:55
To: Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RVI - Portfolio CDS No.1 (Equity Tranche)

Jeff - you should receive in the next day or so a Security Agreement from our
lawyers in Bermuda (Appleby Spurling) which has to be executed on behalf of
ENA.  I have approved these docs - in short the agreement grants us security
in a Reinsurance Contract which supports RVI's obligation under the Credit
Default Swap.

I would be grateful if you could sign where necessary and forward all copies
by courier directly to Sharon White at the following address:

Sharon White
Conyers Dill & Perman
Clarendon House
PO Box HM 666
Hamilton
Bermuda

Sara - I would be grateful if you could provide the requisite legal
initials.  On a separate point - Sara - can you confirm that Greg Whalley has
the authority to sign on behalf of ENA - if so can you have someone fax me a
copy of the signatory authority.

If you have any questions give me buzz.

Many tks

Denis

PS - Drop me a mail when the docs have gone so I can chase-up with Sharon.

From: Sara Shackleton on 01/03/2001 08:27 CST
To: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: R.V.I. Guaranty Co., Ltd., a Bermuda reinsurance company and
Continental Insurance Company

No - you never answered my email of 2/27.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Denis O'Connell
	03/01/2001 07:38 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: R.V.I. Guaranty Co., Ltd., a Bermuda reinsurance company and
Continental Insurance Company

Sara - Has this been sent to Bermuda yet ?  - tks Denis


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Quenet/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 10:12
AM ---------------------------

"Stephanie Blackman" <sblackman@futuresource.com> on 11/22/2000 09:54:55 AM
To: <Joe.Quenet@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Fw: Mistress

NOT A PROBLEM!  WE HAVE TO DO IT AGAIN SOMETIME!!  HAVE A HAPPY TURKEY DAY!

STEPHIE
----- Original Message -----
From: <Joe.Quenet@enron.com>
To: Stephanie Blackman <sblackman@futuresource.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Mistress

>
> good one...................
>
>
>   thanks again for the cocktails last night ,   have a good
> thanksgiving........
>
>
>   Joe

what  am I supposed to read into this.......I checked the distribution list
on her e-mail....I thought I was special except it went out to 65 guys in
this business.....anyway, can you send me that e-mail on bush and gore.....


Attached are the tournament schedules for the A/A Showdown.


Looks like we've got a problem with hourly deliveries at 1/16th of MDQ.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lowry, Phil
Sent:	Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:40 PM
To:	Gadd, Eric
Cc:	Pribble, Dan; Asante, Ben; Martin, Jerry D.; Harris, Steven; Keller, John R.
Subject:	RE: Sun Devil

Eric, here are my thoughts on your Sun Devil issues.

I assume that a guarantee will not include Liquidated Damages, if it does we would want to rethink the response.  However,

?	Current Sun Devil facility design and cost estimates are based upon a 24hr MDQ to match with existing TW Mainline services.
?	Additional facilities will be required to accommodate 24hr ratable nominations at shipper receipt points.
?	Minimum delivery pressures of 500-600 psi should not be an issue for current Sun Devil scope (at 24hr MDQ).  We will run transient modeling to confirm.
?	If requested, we can re-design and re-estimate Sun Devil at a 16hr MDQ, 24hr ratable noms at receipt points and minimum delivery pressure obligations (with Liquidated Damages or not), but it will be enormously more expensive than the current proposed Sun Devil project.
?	Notwithstanding the engineering required to provide these types of services, there may be issues with existing certificates, tariffs, customers etc. due to the fact that Sun Devil gas will run in the same pipeline facilities along with existing Transwestern services.  But I'm not much of an authority in that area.
?	If you would like us to proceed with the re-design and re-estimate please advise John Keller and he will start the paperwork.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 6:01 PM
To:	Lowry, Phil
Subject:	Sun Devil

Phil,

I wanted to get your thoughts on service conditions that we're discussing with prospective Sun Devil shippers.

Hourly swings.  We've indicated that the shippers can nominate 1/16th of their MaxDQ at delivery points in any hour subject to-
- Proper notice
- 24 hour ratable nominations at receipt points
- no obligation on the pipeline to deliver more than the MaxDQ in any gas day

Pressure guarantee.  All prospective shippers are power generators and they want pressure guarantees in the range of 500-600 psig.


Russ:

A couple of questions
1- Check the DOE Northeast Heating season  report.   There seem to be a lot
of LNG terminal and facilities in the Northeast. How do they work? What are
the logistics of transportation etc...

2- Arnold's buddy has been looking into the logistics of  trucking LNG to CA.
Is this possible? Can investigate the probability?

Thanks
JF


Please give me any concerns you have with this by the end if the
day-otherwise I am recommending adopting this proposal

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 12:23
PM ---------------------------

"Ishikawa, Richard - TPRMI" <RIshikawa@socalgas.com> on 08/22/2000 04:27:10 PM
To: "'Tholt, Jane'" <jane.m.tholt@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: (Firm) August 17 Pooling Technical Subcommittee Meeting

The original message did not go through so I am trying it again.

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Ishikawa, Richard - TPRMI
Sent:?? Tuesday, August 22, 2000 2:13 PM
To:???? 'bcantre@enron.com'; 'skinnml@texaco.com'; 'tcarlson@apsc.com';
'pcervin@br-inc.com'; 'petersdd@bp.com'; 'sam.brown@swgas.com'; 'Cluff,
Drew'; 'Minshew, Chuck'; 'Black, Larry'; 'Tholt, Jane'; 'King, Allen'

Cc:???? Wah, Pauline C. - TPPCW
Subject:??????? RE: (Firm) August 17 Pooling Technical Subcommittee Meeting
Sensitivity:??? Confidential

Attached for your review is a draft copy of the "Goals to be Accomplished"
which has been revised pursuant to the last meeting of the El Paso Technical
Pooling Subcommittee held on August 17.? Please let me have your comments as
soon as possible so that we can forward this on to El Paso in a timely
fashion.? Thanks.

 <<pooling goals.doc>>

 - pooling goals.doc


Return-Path: <Matthew.Neff@phs.com>
Received: from  rly-zc04.mx.aol.com (rly-zc04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.4]) by
air-zc05.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:01:26 -0400
Received: from  smtp.exodus.net (smtp02.exodus.net [216.34.163.232]) by
rly-zc04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:00:54 -0400
Received: from exosecure-paccare-rap-sec.pacificare.com (inet-fwi-b.phs.com
[216.34.197.221]) by smtp.exodus.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id
e9KGwgs29703 for <lillahmay@aol.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:58:42 -0500
Received: from [149.111.1.113] by
exosecure-paccare-rap-sec.pacificare.com          via smtpd (for
[216.34.163.230]) with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 16:58:56 UT
Received: from 149.111.70.130 by inetws1.phs.com with SMTP (WorldSecure
Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:00:25 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 37b9e691-8261-11d3-8e30-0001fa7e659e
Received: from 149.111.61.63 by inetws2.phs.com with ESMTP (WorldSecure
Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:58:44 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 9d23082c-823c-11d3-b522-0001fa7e355e
Received: by dca2p02.phs.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<4LS6Q6SC>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:58:46 -0700
Message-ID: <78ED50AB0803D21192880000F8C991D10427E9D1@nwa2p01.phs.com>
From: Matthew.Neff@phs.com
Subject: Ermitage-Football in Oregon
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:58:41 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-WSS-ID: 15EEA649434608-01-16
X-WSS-ID: 15EEA6271726-02-02
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C03AB7.016DFC51"
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

This also kicks ass...

GOBEAVS.

 <<Ermitage-Football in Oregon.htm>>

 - Ermitage-Football in Oregon.htm


New plan.

Staying in Calgary.

Want to go to Earl's?

Call Me!


Attached please find the most recent guidelines for confirming swap
transactions with RMT.  Please distribute this memorandum to others involved
in the confirmation process, as appropriate, and feel free to call me at
X34718 if you have any questions or comments.

Regards.
Rhett Jackson


Harry.  Tamara is finishing a model that give impact according to rate
design.

It is far more difficult to model the effects of behaviour change that will
ocur with higher prices in the summer.  I spoke with David Roberts (EAM) and
ran this structure by him and he is of the same opinion as I that:
Very high rates from 12noon to 6PM do not encourage DSM because:
The risk of installing capital in time for June,July, Aug, Sep is significant
when the timing is short and each month lost decreases the value of the
investment by 1/4
Very high rates from 12noon to 6PM will result in behaviour changes by
changing behaviour more than DSM.  ie.  They will turn up the temperature for
these hours.
Very high rates for 12noon to 6PM encourage curtailment activities but not as
much load shifting.  ie a 2 part rate would encourage doing your annual plant
turnaround in Aug ($250/MWh signal) more than the CPUC proposal for August
($110/MWh signal).
Very high rates starting in June, would be difficult to optimize, given the
lack of certainty today about whether the rates will be pasted and the short
lead time.

The rate design I have proposed below gives large price signals in the summer
and the winter, than those proposed by CPUC, while lessening the impact to
Enron tariff book.

Price Signals Comparison

	Summer
	(PGE=Jun-Oct, SCE=May-Sep)	Summer 	Winter	Winter
CPUC Proposal	On Peak - 12noon to 6PM WD	Off  Peak 	On Peak	Off Peak
       PGE E19 Secondary	$370/MWh	$75/MWh	$75/MWh	$75/MWh
       SCE TOU 8 Secondary	$145/MWh	$122/MWh	$122/MWh	$122/MWh
2 Part RTP Proposal
       PGE E19 Secondary	$290/MWh based on Apr 1 NP15	$150/MWh based on Apr 1 NP15	$180/MWh based
on Q4 Apr 1 NP15	$131/MWh based on Q4  Apr 1 NP15
       SCE TOU 8 Secondary	$157/MWh based on Apr 1 SP15	$122/MWh	$156/MWh based on Q4 Apr 1
NP15	$98/MWh

Lets see if we can get together with the DSM people today.

Scott

From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 04/03/2001 07:40 AM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara
Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

I still think it is imperative that we use our book position, by rate
schedule and time period (on-peak, off-peak) , to quantify the sensitivity to
different types of rate designs.  For instance, if there is a large increase
in summer on-peak, how much of the increase can we avoid with aggressive DSM,
etc.  Can we look at this quantification today?

	Scott Stoness@EES
	04/02/2001 09:34 PM

		 To: James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Don Black, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, harry kingerski
		 Subject: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

Harry and I are meeting tomorrow.  I would like any feedback you have related
to the following:

Based on our position we would prefer:
Later surcharges
Lower surcharges
Surcharges that are lower in the summer (flatter is better because it is
closer, the NPV effects and our rapidly diminishing position)

The proposal below could either result in:
Delay of a month while they consider this complicated affair (low likelihood)
Lower surcharge if we can convince people that market rates are $300/MWh for
a year when they are actually $200.  We would only get a $20/MWh increase, as
compared to a $30/MWh increase.  ie (1-90%) times $300/MWh yields $30/MWh is
our story when the actural is (1-90%)times $200/MWh yields $20/MWh.
The Enron rates below are effectively much flatter than the CPUC proposal.
Thus we would be better off if accepted.
Additionally if our noise causes a flat $30/MWh increase to replace the CPUC
proposal, we are better off.

Additionally,
we could sell hedging on the 10% exposed to markets.
DSM related to capital investments should be less risky.

The risks to Enron are:
Proposal makes it easy to hit the large customers with a lower baseline (ie
75% instead of 90%)
Would make DSM more risky.  DSM providers would have to buy hedges to proceed.

The questions to answer are:
Could Enron provide witnesses without drawing more negatives
Would a partner tow the Enron line
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Stoness/HOU/EES on 04/02/2001 09:22
PM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
04/02/2001 09:21 PM
To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: harry kingerski
Subject: Draft Testimony re PGE/SCE for Discussion

Summary:
The CPUC should implement two part RTP/TOU rates for PGE/SCE.  A two part
rate is a rate where customers pay their historical rate for consumption of
normal load and pay market value for consumption incremental (or decremental)
to normal load.
The CPUC should define normal consumption as consumption over and above 90%
of historical 2000 consumption.
The CPUC should define the hourly rate as the highest hourly price paid by
DWR for spot purchases in that hour.
In the event that implementation of two part RTP/TOU rates is complicated to
design, the $30/MWh surcharge should be applied to all customers until the
implementation of two part RTP/TOU rates is possible.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, is discriminatory to large customers.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, does not provide appropriate price
signals.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results in rate increases to large
customers that are unneccessarly high.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results in rate increases to large
customers, that are far in excess of those which the CPUC intended.
The current draft design, of the CPUC, results is static and does not respond
to changing market conditions.

Design Goals:
The CPUC should design rates that:
Give appropriate price signals to customers to consume / conserve energy as
as close to marginal price as possible in as many hours as possible.
Treat all rate classes in a fair and consistent manner.
Achieve targeted revenue requirements.
Are easy to administer and understand.

Summary of CPUC Illustrative Design:
The CPUC has proposed rates that move on peak pricing in the summer close to
marginal rates:
Draft proposal provides marginal price signal of about $370/MWh for E19
Secondary from in Summer Weekdays from noon to 6PM
Draft proposal provides marginal price signal of about $75/MWh for E19
Secondary from in all other hours.
Critique based on Design Goals:
Draft proposals move toward marginal rates but fall short.
The rates for power, Mar 30 2001, based on DJ-NP15, on peak is $181.94/MWh.
The rates for power, Mar 30 2001, based on DJ-NP15, off peak is $93.46/MWh.
The proposed marginal rates for E19 Secondary, is $75/MWh for on peak and off
peak.
This rate design will not encourage investments in assets that result in
lower consumption in the winter or in off peak periods.
 Draft proposal falls short on treating customers on a consistent basis:
E20 Transmission Voltage customers will experience a 87% rate increase.
E19 Secondary voltage customers will experience a 41% rate increase.
A10 Medium General Service customers will experience a 20% rate increase.
A1 Small L&P customers will experience a 16% rate increase.
The marginal price signal for A10 will be $121/MWh vs $370/MWh for E-20
transmission in the on peak summer.
The marginal price signal for E10 wills be 107/MWh vs $55/MWh for E-20
transmission in the off peak periods.
PGE has a longer summer period than SCE.  This results in a 69% increase for
SCE TOU-8-Sub as compared to 87% increases for PGE E20 Transmission rate.
The proposal also results in far different marginal price signals for SCE
customers than PGE customers.  For example the on peak rate for SCE TOU-8-Sub
is $128/MWh as compared to PGE E20 Transmission rate of $374/MWh.
Draft proposal does do a good job of recovering $2.2b of revenue.
Draft proposal require some implementation but given that the surcharge
increase does not ocur until May for PGE and June for SCE, it should be
possible to implement.

Enron Proposed Rates:
Enron proposes:
Two part real time pricing time of use rate,
Usage up to 90% of historical use would be billed at historical rates.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
DJ-NP15 On Peak and DJ-NP15 Off Peak, where customers has real time metering.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
DJ-NP15 On Peak and DJ-NP15 Off Peak averaged over the month, where customers
has time of use metering.
Usage incremental or decremental to 90% of historical use, would be billed at
45% of DJ-NP15 On Peak and 55% of DJ-NP15 Off Peak averaged over the month,
where customers has just energy metering.
Critique based on Design Goals:
Enron proposals charge all customer at very close  to marginal rates.
Thus, within the constraints of using Dow Jones, the rates should be very
close to the actual marginal rates.
The rates will not be exact because they are:
Determined on the previous day
Ony differentiate between on and off peak, as compared to hour by hour.
To the extent that the customer does not have real time metering capability,
the rates will be determined on a class average basis.
However, the rates be far superior to the CPUC draft design because:
They give better price signals to night consumption
They give better signals to weekend consumption
They give better signals to winter consumption
They are self correcting in that they do not require predetermination of
marginal costs.  For example, if summer costs are lower, the rate will be
lower.
The Enron proposal will motivate DSM activities in winter, summer and off
peak.
Enron proposal results in similar rate structure and impact regardless of
utility and rate class.
The Enron proposal results in a similar concept for commerical and industrial
as with residential.  AB1X provides that residential customers that consume
energy below normal rates will not have increased rates.  This design also
achieves the same effect for commercial and industrial customers.
Draft proposal does do a good job of recovering $2.2b of revenue but even
more importantly it ensures tracking of costs.
Setting the normal load at 90% of historical load results in a $30/MWh
increase if the market value for the entire year is $300/MWh.
In the event that the market value for the entire year is less than $300/MWh,
the resulting cost decreases will offset the lost revenue.
The Enron proposed rate design structure is flexi ble enough that it can
easily be changed to achieve greater or lessor revenue to achieve price
signals and revenue targets.
The revenue outcome is less certain than the CPUC draft design however the
impact should be more certain because the revenue will automatically go up
when the costs go up.
Draft proposal require greater implementation details than the CPUC design
but such extra costs are worthwhile.
The Enron proposal requires:
Determination of historical loads for large customers
Determination of class consumption profiles for demand metered customers
Determination of class consumption profiles for energy metered customers
Determination of customer profiles in the event that the customers is a new
customer
Then Enron proposal has the following negatives:
Some customers who have reduced load from historical levels will be better
off even though they have not changed their behaviour in response to the new
price signals
The rates will require greater administrative costs since they are different
for each customer.
The rates may take more work to put in place for the utility
The rates will result in similar customers paying dissimilar rates, depending
upon the historical consumption of the customers

Q.  In the event that it is not possible to implement the Enron rates by June
1, 2001, what would you propose a an interim solution:
A.  The CPUC draft rates are so flawed, that it would be superior to just
implement a flat $30/MWh surcharge to all customers.  This approach would be
fairer and simpler.

Q.  Who would pay for the decremental consumption of customers?
A.  The DWR will incur a decline in their costs equal to the decrease in
rates of the utilities.  The are indifferent to buy more generation or
selling less energy to customers.  Thus the DWR should be willing to pay for
decremental consumption.  In the event that the DWR is not agreeable to
paying for decremental consumption, the utility should be allowed to borrow
such funds and have the costs amortized for the next 10 years.  In the event
that the utility is unable to fund decremental consumption, the normal load
could be defined 85% of historical and the CPUC could eliminate credits
resulting from decremental consumption.  Such solution would discourage
conservation below 15% but would not be expected to diminish the
effectiveness of the Enron proposed rates.

Q.  Why is DJ-NP15 the right index to choose?
A.  DJ-NP15 and DJ-SP15 are availble for each weekday for on and off peak
pricing.  The index is a mathematical average of trades in the previous day
for today.  The DJ index is compiled based on the information provided by
many of the large trading companies including Enron.  The numbers provided by
the participants are subject to audit.  Thus DJ is the best avaible
information available for energy pricing.

Q.  What index is suitable for weekends?
A. Enron proposes that the average DJ-NP15 off peak energy charges for friday
and monday be used to determine the weekend rates for the purpose of rate
setting.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Monica - Vacation

Date:		10/6/2000
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Kay:

George Kutzschbach of Fulbright called this afternoon to request copies of
the executed Assignment and Assumption Agreements and Bills of Sale for the
turbine/transformer transaction between ENA and Sweetgum Energy LP.  George
has unsigned copies of these documents.  Our closing volumes also contain
only unsigned copies of these documents.

George is asking for the documents with respect to both the turbines and the
transformer, but is needing them specifically for the transformer.
Apparently, CA-II is planning to sell the transformer, and he is gathering
up the documents that would show title to the transformer in CA-II.

I have reviewed the documents, and do not see any reason why we should not
deliver them.  Can you provide signed copies of these documents?   Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


FYI - Today will be my last full day in the office.  I plan to work at least
partial days from home until the baby arrives, monitoring e-mail and working
on a few ongoing projects, and will be reachable at the numbers listed
below.  Once I head for the hospital I'll change my voicemail to indicate
that I'm out of service for a while, and will reference the people who will
be responsible for the various activities in my group.

Home phone:  281-528-6606
Home fax:  281-288-0277
Pager:  888-740-9948
Cell:  713-417-9188

Unless something happens between now and then, I plan to be on Steve's staff
call on Friday morning at 9:30, and will hold a Info/Admin staff call on
Friday morning at 11:00.  (Clerical staff don't need to be on that call.)
(Gus - Please set up this conference call.)

Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:49 AM ---------------------------

Mark.Ebert@broadwing.com on 11/10/2000 07:39:54 AM
To: zambrano@austintexas.org, bphipps@carltonstaffing.com,
bonnie.ebert@tasb.org, BryLad5@aol.com, dgiron@ect.enron.com,
david.long@tdhca.state.tx.us, keykeith@mindspring.com,
george.ewton@unisys.com, heather.hodnett@tdhca.state.tx.us,
bjnelson81@uswest.net, jw@cleartrading.com, keith.doran@tdhca.state.tx.us,
psalas@flash.net, SPSMITHCPA@aol.com, swash@tdhca.state.tx.us
cc: Kelly.Allen@Broadwing.com, Stephanie.Brieger@broadwing.com,
Juli.Word@broadwing.com
Subject: FW: Florida Ballot News

-----Original Message-----
From: Haley, Brian
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:42 PM
To: Ebert, Mark (Broadwing); Allen, Kelly
Subject: FW: Florida Ballot News

Thought'd you appreciate this based on our conversation yesterday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rees, Jonathan
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:39 PM
To: Haley, Brian
Subject: FW: Florida Ballot News

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Sue Ann (Broadwing)
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:37 PM
To: Rees, Jonathan
Subject: Florida Ballot News

 - Morons1.gif


Dale,

I have passed on the information you gave me but you have to realize that
I acted just as a go-between. I shall be glad to remind our new business unit
about your proposal. I have already asked a few times.

I shall be traveling this week, Wed - Fri. I shall be back in the office on
Monday.

Vince

"Dale Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com> on 06/06/2000 02:03:18 AM
To: "Vincent Kaminski" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Follow up

Vince:

Just wanted to make sure you know we are still vitally interested in getting
together with you and the key Enron people.  Thanks so much for all your
help.  I understand how busy you and the new person are, but I hope you are
interested enough to find a slot for us.  I think it will benefit you as
well as us.

Dale


Dear ShareBulder:

I am pleased to announce the selection of the GE Money Market Fund (the "GE
Fund") as an improved way to manage your ShareBuilder account cash
balances.  Beginning October 2, 2000, all customer deposits and cash balances
will
be automatically "swept" into the GE Fund and maintained there.  When you
purchase stock through ShareBuilder, money will be automatically transferred
back from the GE Fund to cover your transactions.  This will all be done
automatically.  You do not have to do anything to arrange transfers and you
will
be able to access your ShareBuilder cash balances as quickly as you can
today.

The GE Money Market Fund is administered by GE Asset Management, Inc., a
registered investment adviser and wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric
Company.  GE is one of the largest fund management businesses in the U.S. -
their investment advisory business oversees more than $100 billion.  This
replaces our current structure, which pays daily interest on your cash
balances.  You should generally realize a higher return through the GE Fund -
money
fund dividend yields tend to exceed the discounted T-Bill interest rates we
now pay.  GE Fund dividends will be calculated daily and posted monthly to
your online ShareBuilder account statement.

This ShareBuilder upgrade will be part of every account and will be added
to the "Terms and Conditions" in the account agreement.  Beginning October
2nd, all current and future customer accounts will automatically incorporate
the GE Fund for cash balances.  We will provide a link to the GE Fund's
prospectus directly from ShareBuilder.com.

Again, you don't have to do anything to effect this change.  However, if
you have any concerns or questions, please contact us via email at
mailto:customercare@netstock.com or toll-free at 888-NET-STOK between the
hours of 6 AM
and 6 PM Pacific Time, Monday through Friday.

I am very excited about this enhancement to ShareBuilder, and I hope you
enjoy the change!

Sincerely,

Jeff Seely
President and CEO
Netstock Investment Corporation


Tomorrow

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE: conf call

What day?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:55 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	conf call

Stacey, can you do a conference call at 10:30 your time with Jeff and myself?

John Postlethwaite
EPMI-West Power Risk Management
503-464-7756


So.........


----- Original Message -----
From: "gerardo ruiz" <gee_ruiz@hotmail.com>
To: <Alvaro_Ramirez@acml.com>; <norajaramillo73@hotmail.com>;
<marie1477@aol.com>; <CCepeda@SBSNEWYORK.com>; <enegron@exchange.ml.com>;
<drehovah@aol.com>; <lisdawg82@aol.com>; <boobie702@aol.com>;
<tonyp@elitebrokers.net>; <mattc@elitebrokers.net>; <r1minnie@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:25 AM
Subject: this one's funny.

>
>
>
> >From: PhilipV@ilx.com
> >Subject: this one's funny.
> >Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:54:57 -0400
> >
> >
> >  this one's funny.
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

 - password.jpg


Hello there!  I know that you are out of the country.  Thanks for forwarding
the message from Andre Cangucu.  I have been through your materials but do
not find any involvement you may have had with specific swaps; the items I
found were generic and were in the form of law firm memoranda (e.g.,
"Derivatives and FX Transactions in Brazil", "Trading with Brazilian
Counterparties", etc.).  Am I missing something?  Look forward to seeing you
soon.  Sara


Lisa,

Do you know what happened to the IMAX umbrella you borrowed last month?   Gordon is trying to track it down.

Thanks,
Kathy


yes

Ina Rangel
04/23/2001 05:04 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Power Group

John,

Have you cleared everything with Presto about having to move over one row to
make room for Fred's group?

-Ina


This is from the SAP Integrated Solutions Center (ISC):

Do you feel like your reports take forever to run during close?

Do you feel like you have to "reinvent the wheel" each month when you are trying to get your data?

Do you think that the close should be extended just so you have time to run all of your reports?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, then we want to help......

The Integrated Solutions Center (ISC) will be conducting condensed SAP Reporting Workshops on October 29th and 30th.  We'll be providing Tips and Tricks that will help you more efficiently create and execute reports in SAP during the financial close process.

These workshops will be valuable and we encourage each of you to attend.  Please feel free to forward this invitation to those that you think would benefit from these sessions.  There is no signup required and no cost to participate.

The presentation times are as follows:

Oct 29   Monday  1pm - 2pm	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 29   Monday  2pm - 3pm	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 29   Monday  3pm - 4pm	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 29   Monday  4pm - 5pm	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center

Oct 30   Tuesday   8am -  9am	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 30   Tuesday   9am - 10am	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 30   Tuesday  10am - 11am	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center
Oct 30   Tuesday  11am - 12am	The Forum, 12th floor of 2 Allen Center

*** All participants will be entered into a drawing to receive a $100 American Express Gift Certificate.

If you are unable to attend during these sessions, we will be providing the presentation documents on the ISC website.  You can access this information from the financial close link on the ISC home page or use the following address: <http://isc.enron.com/site/fico-close.htm>.  We also suggest that you add this address to your favorites for easy access in the future.

Duane Fritz
I.S.C. Customer Care
Design & Process Support
ISC Web: <http://isc.enron.com/site>
ISC Customer Care: 713-345-4727
ISC Online Education <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:50 PM ---------------------------

"Michael Kurman" <KurmanM@arentfox.com> on 07/06/2000 11:26:31 AM
To: <DRogers2@ei.enron.com>, <nancy.corbet@enron.com>,
<Paul.E.Parrish@enron.com>, <Todd.Peterson@Enron.com>
cc: "Sumanto Basu" <BasuS@arentfox.com>, "Eugene A. Massey"
<MasseyE@arentfox.com>

Subject: EcoElectrica  Conditions of Use

Per Gene Massey's request following up this morning's telephone conversation
with Dan, I attach a discussion draft of a matrix summarizing the coverage
(as to risks/obligations/liabilities) of the draft Conditions of Use in
relation to coverage under law in the absence of the Conditions of Use
document.  We understand that this matrix will be the basis of a telephone
discussion on these issues.

 - COU-Matrix7.doc


******GET FREE ANNUAL REPORTS FOR OVER 3000 COMPANIES**********

Dear Former Subscriber:

Whether you work for an investment firm or you,re an individual
investor, you need an unbiased opinion before making an
investment decision.  That,s how TheStreet.com can help.

In association with World Investor, TheStreet.com is pleased
to provide you access to thousands of annual reports on publicly
traded companies - FREE!  Search for a report by either company
name or industry and get it mailed to you or download it when
available.  Click here to find a report:

http://thestreet.ar.wilink.com?mkt_code=StreetARS1

Get the information you need to succeed when you are making
your investment decisions - FREE!

Sharon Bogan
Marketing
TheStreet.com

===============================================================
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M  If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
members@realmoney.com, or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html


Molly will chat with you about this and Molly just found out about it.

Hi Molly!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 01:14
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
05/10/2000 02:52 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: K#51407

Has this been done?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

Mark Feldman
04/17/2000 05:34 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: K#51407

Chris,
As we discussed, please get with Brenda Fletcher and set this up as a demand
to pay the .0153 storage fee, since the pathing does not allow me to pay
through the Volume system.  As long as it is on the deal, it will show up in
Settlements and I can pay.  Also, I need it done from January 2000 to current.

Thanks,
Mark


Hello
I have a question, should the Counterparty on this trade be Peco Energy?
We have Constellation but bro does not know trade as Constellation

Tom Alonso's name is on bro confirm (Peco) but deal 459243.01 is under Mark
Fischer (COnstellation)

Thanks


I am going to leave at 3:00.  No I did not get any details other than worms.
I hope the bill is not terrible.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490