Vasant,

No problem.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue
01/19/2001 05:48 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congestion Pricing & Forecasting program

I would like to go to this conference/tutorial on Congestion modeling and
management.  Is that OK, or would you prefer somebody else to go?

Thanks,
Vasant

---------------------- Forwarded by Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
05:38 PM ---------------------------

Infocast <mail@infocastinc.com> on 01/19/2001 03:58:13 PM
To: Vasant.Shanbhogue@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Congestion Pricing & Forecasting program

As an Infocast Preferred Customer, we would like to invite you to attend our
highly acclaimed program, Congestion Pricing & Forecasting, scheduled for
February 21-23, 2001 in Washington DC at a very Special Discount!  Attend
this program for only $895.00 and the pre-conference workshop, Congestion
Pricing Tutorial: From LMP to Flow-Based for only $520.00.  This is a 25%
savings off the standard tuition!  However, this special offer is only good
through Friday, January 26, 2001 and seats are rapidly filling!  Attached you
will find a copy of this timely and informative Infocast program, or you can
visit our website at www.infocastinc.com.

Congestion Pricing & Forecasting has been designed to provide you with a
clear understanding of how to predict the impacts of congestion and what
mechanisms can be used to control these impacts.  Experts will discuss:

? The most advanced techniques for forecasting transmission congestion,
locational prices and FTR prices
? The latest approaches to the "seams" issues
? The pros and cons of implementing a flow-based congestion management system

Don't miss this excellent opportunity.  But remember, this offer is only good
until January 26, 2001 so please phone me at (818) 888-4444 ext. 20 or email
me at mail@infocastinc.com and mention this letter to be registered at this
exceptional price. You can also fax or mail me your completed registration
form along with this letter.

Best regards,
Hiedy Vitug
Preferred Customer Representative
Infocast
(818) 888-4444 ext. 20
Fax (818) 888-4440
Email: mail@infocastinc.com

Enclosure

If you do not wish to receive e-mail notification of Infocast conferences,
click on the text below and send
mailto:mail@informationforecast.com?subject=Delete from mailing list

 - congest.pdf


I will be out the 5th but plan to be here the 12th and 24th.

Carol St Clair
04/18/2000 11:52 AM
To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Upcoming Seminars

As we discussed last week, we are in the process of scheduling lunch seminars
with credit, confirms/settlements and global contracts for the following
dates:

May 5th, 12th and 24th.

Please let Sara and I know ASAP if you plan to be out onh any of these dates
as we feel that it is very important that you attend.

Tana:
Have you talked to the Global Contracts Group about the 24th?

Carol


Which of these do you consider to be our "form" for EPC contracts.  My
understanding is that we are still developing the Turbopark form.  Do you
know whether that is correct?


Please plan to attend a TW analysis meeting tomorrow morning, Friday, January 25 from 9:00am to 11:00am in EB1336.  Richard and Sean will share the results from their detailed analysis of TW.

Thanks, Kim.


The attached schedule cover both Friday and Saturday, March 15-16.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


Effective July1, 2000, I will be the new point of contact at Enron North
America for Devon.  In an effort to
avoid duplication of e-mails to every scheduler on every desk, I would like
to forward the volumes, revisions
or any other pertinent information to only the people who need it.   Could
you please send me a list of the schedulers
who handle Devon on each of your desks and the pipes they schedule?  I will
also forward a copy of any changes to
a point person on each desk that will follow up with the schedulers to make
sure they make appropriate revisions.

If you have any suggestions on how to streamline this process any further,
please let me know.

Thanks,
Bev Beaty
3-6357


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Melethil, Anwar
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Baxter, Bryce; Bussell l, Kathryn; Dawes, Cheryl; Dhont, Margaret; Ed Terry; Farmer, Daren J.; Greif, Donna; Hall, Bob M; Harwell, Melanie; Heal, Kevin; Howard Camp; Jacobs, Charles; Jaquet, Tammy; John Lopez; Kinsey, Lisa; Lakho, Shahnaz; Lamadrid, Victor; Machleit, Shirley; Mcclure, Mark; McFatridge, Thomas; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Palmer, B. Scott; Pinion, Richard; Reeves, Leslie; Smith, George F.; Staab, Theresa; Sullivan, Patti; Superty, Robert; Valderrama, Lisa; Wynne, Rita
Cc:	Cuccia, Michael; Kaspereit, Michael; Laurel, Robert; Mallak, Mutaz; Martinez, Danny; Neal, Steve; Pena, Matt; Roberts, Steve; Smith, Regan M.; SQL_MAIL; Stokes, Darren; Ward, Bob; Warner, John; Zwiers, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Unify Gas Month end Close - November 2001

attached is the month end close document for Gas Settlements:

the first mass draft run is tomorrow, Nov 15 for ENA Sales/Supply at 7.00pm.
Michael Cuccia will be monitoring the mass drafts for this month end.

thanks,
Anwar

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melethil, Anwar
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:01 PM
To:	Baxter, Bryce; Hiatt, Wendy; Jaquet, Tammy; Lakho, Shahnaz; Mcclure, Mark; Pinion, Richard; Wynne, Rita
Cc:	Cuccia, Michael; Laurel, Robert; Mallak, Mutaz; Martinez, Danny; Neal, Steve; Pena, Matt; Roberts, Steve; Smith, Regan M.; SQL_MAIL; Stokes, Darren; Ward, Bob; Warner, John; Zwiers, Jeff
Subject:	Unify Gas Month end Close - November 2001

Please review the attached 'month end close' document and let us know if you would like to make any changes.

 << File: Month End Close -November.doc >>

i will be sending out this document tomorrow to the other Business Leads who are not in this list.

thanks very much.

Cheers,
Anwar


Mary will be working from home today.  She is also available on cell.

I do not know when she will return to the office, but will update you as I
receive more information.

Lysa
503/464-7927


HI Brad:

I am it for our group!  However, it might be a good idea to train Sam Smith
also.

Please let us know.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

From: Brad McSherry on 03/20/2000 05:38 PM
To: Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rosalinda Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Time keeping

Lydia/Rosie/Donna/Shirley,

We are looking to implement SAP HR by 7/1/00.  There is a time keeping module
in the program.  Please send me a list of the time keepers for your groups.
Do not forget to send your own name if you keep time.  Time keepers will be
contacted in the near future for training on the new system.

Thank you for your help,
Brad


A redlined version with my changes.  Let me know if you have any questions.


Leslie - please call me

I talked to Barry and he has some comments

Steph

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lawner, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Cantrell, Rebecca
Cc: Comnes, Alan; Tycholiz, Barry; Nicolay, Christi; Perrino, Dave; Black,
Don; Fulton, Donna; McMichael Jr., Ed; Smith, George F.;
jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com; Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer;
Shireman, Kristann; Sullivan, Patti; Kaufman, Paul; Allen, Phillip K.; Gay,
Randall L.; Alvarez, Ray; Frank, Robert; Superty, Robert; McCubbin, Sandra;
Miller, Stephanie; Walton, Steve; South, Steven P.; Mara, Susan; Calcagno,
Suzanne
Subject: Re: FOR FINAL REVIEW -- ENA Comments in Support of Kern River

I have added a reference to recent FERC decision in a Kern River case which
rejected a contract provision between Kern and Union Pacific which would have
given UP priority rights to reduce its CD.  This is on page 9.
 << File: Kern5.doc >>

	Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT 06/12/01 05:20 PM 	   To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Barry Tycholiz/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven P
South/Enron@EnronXGate, Randall L Gay/Enron@EnronXGate, Patti
Sullivan/Enron@EnronXGate, Kristann Shireman/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Calcagno/Enron@EnronXGate, Ed
McMichael/Enron@EnronXGate, George F Smith/Enron@EnronXGate  cc:   Subject:
FOR FINAL REVIEW -- ENA Comments in Support of Kern River

Attached for your review and comments are ENA's comments in support of Kern
River's petition for a declaratory order relating to SoCal Gas' assertion
that it has the first right to expansion capacity now being constructed in
the California Emergency Action Project  to add 135,000 Mcf/d of capacity to
California that would come on-line during July.

The comments must be filed at FERC by Friday, June 15.  If you have issues or
comments, please contact Leslie Lawner or me as soon as you can.  Leslie is
at 505-623-6778 and my extension in Houston is 35840.  If possible, e-mail us
since we will both be traveling or at an off-site meeting beginning mid-day
Wednesday.

 << File: CP01-381 KR Petition Draft 4.doc >>


It will take me awhile to find it.  Please ask Linda Simmons.

From: Carlos Sole on 05/17/2001 11:15 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: List of Outside Counsel

Would you forward me the outside counsel list again.  thanks

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


Russell,  The 2nd Huber transaction was executed and Huber is contractually
bound to take assignment of the transportation.  We have gotten approval of
the assignment form from the Pipeline and expect to execute the assignments
and capacity release documents with Huber next week.  The capacity release
document just specifies the details of the capacity release.  Huber is bound
by the 2nd transaction to accept our release.    I will let you know when
these sets of documents are executed.

Let me know if you have any questions.

	Russell Diamond
	11/03/2000 11:08 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: JM Huber

Gerald,

Can you please let me know where we stand with the execution of the JM Huber
transactions and contracts that is being originated in the Denver office.  As
you are aware the first transaction and contract we entered into did not
contain the assignment language for the transportation on a yearly basis.
The second transaction was to include this assignment language.  ENA
currently has large exposure from JM Huber for the first transaction because
the assignment contracts have not been signed as of yet, as far as I am
aware.  If the contract negotiations are going to continue for an extended
period of time, Credit is going to have to reserve the transactions to cover
this exposure.  Please let me know what the status is.

Thank you,
Russell


Great!  We're set on that front, then.

Thanks,
-Dovie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Keprta, Dovie
Subject:	RE: Confidentiality Agreement for special HR access to PEP

If it is same as mid-year, then I won't need to look at it.  Thanks.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keprta, Dovie
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:27 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Confidentiality Agreement for special HR access to PEP

Hi Michelle-

Here's the Confidentiality Agreement we used at Mid Year for the HR staff who required access to employee records outside their own BU or access to restricted records (HR employees).

Would you like to revise this form, or shall we use the same version for this round?

Please let me know your thoughts as soon as possible.

Thanks,
-Dovie

 << File: Confidential  Agreement.doc >>

Dovie Keprta
Global Performance Management
713.345.8864 desk
713.516.5598 cell


see below - I still have to find someone whose email we can send the requests but I will do that by tomorrow

During weeks 1 through weeks 10 we will conduct free agent drafts.  Each team will start with 100 fantasy points to use for bidding on free agents and will be awarded points each week based on your finish that week.  The highest scoring team will receive 1 point and the lowest scoring team will receive 10 points.  Each Thursday at 12pm we will conduct a free agent draft.  You must submit a list of the players you want to bid on with the points you bid on them to an email address yet to be determined.  After 12pm the highest bidder for each player will we awarded the free agent.  You can bid 0 points for a player but will lose if anyone else bids at least 1 point.

If you have a Defense or Kicker on a bye week, you can pick up a bye week replacement from the free agent pool for free.  After the bye week is over, you must drop the replacement player.  Bye week replacements must be submitted via email to mcuilla@enron.com and will be awarded based on lowest YTD points scored.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:20 AM
To:	Cuilla, Martin
Subject:	Pickups

How do we pickup somebody?


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/13/2001>, published as of 11/13/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

PRELIMINARY


I am planning to take her to lunch after the Lay Reviews in a couple of weeks.  You guys will be invited.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: Jan Moore 20 Years with Enron

Will you be having cake to celebrate this incredible event?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lokay, Michelle; Lindberg, Lorraine; Robertson, Audrey; Hayslett, Rod; Gilbert, Steve
Subject:	Jan Moore 20 Years with Enron

FYI Tuesday, October 23 was Jan's 20 year anniversary with Enron.


Re: PG&E's Open Season --

 <<PGE Open Season Application Comments.rtf>>

Attached are Pacific Gas and Electric Company's responses to Administrative
Law Judge Brown's questions posed in the "Administrative Law Judge's Ruling
Shortening Time for Protests or Responses and Replies to the Application
Filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company," issued June 14, in A.01-06-020
("PG&E gas transportation open season").

These PG&E responses ("PG&E Comments") are provided to the e-mail list sent
out yesterday (June 19) to recipients, per Judge Brown's request to PG&E.
(Please note that a limited number of recipients subsequently notified PG&E
that they did not wish to remain on the e-mail list.  Accordingly, PG&E has
modified the list and the instant e-mail list of recipients reflects those
modifications/deletions.)

PG&E will also provide the PG&E Comments by mail to the service list in
I.99-07-003.

If technical questions arise from this e-mail, please call my secretary, Amy
Yu, at 415-973-2769.

Thank you,

Dave Anderson, PG&E Law Department 415-973-6659

 - PGE Open Season Application Comments.rtf


Are you going tonight?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Please forward your schedules for next week (June 11 - 15) to me by
by Friday afternoon, June 8th.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


1. Thank you for all your support on the Arena Proposition.
2. The following article reminded me to pass along a note about a PR/PA
firm in California who Baselice & Associates worked with this year in
passing Prop 35 (a contracting out initiative).  The firm is a full service
firm named Woodward & McDowell.  They have been active in California
legislative and initiative battles for some 20 years and I highly recommend
them if Enron is in search of support with the electric deregulation fight
out there.  Dick Woodward or Dave Fogarty can be reached at 650-340-0470.

If you have any questions, please call.

Mike

MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Road
Suite O-2
Austin, TX  78759
Phone: (512) 345-9720
Fax: (512) 345-9740
email: mikeb@baselice.com

November 8, 2000
Calif Regulators,Grid Oper In Turf War Over Generation By JASON LEOPOLD Of
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES LOS ANGELES-California's electricity regulators and
power-grid operator are locked in a turf war over who has the authority to
order new power plant construction next summer to ensure the state has
enough juice on hand when demand soars.
The California Public Utilities Commission says it can bring emergency
power on line at a fraction of the cost that the Independent System
Operator is expected to pay independent power producers for the same
service.
Under it's plan, PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Edison
International's (EIX) Southern California Edison unit and Sempra Energy's
(SRE) San Diego Gas & Electric Co. were ordered to submit documents by the
end of November stating whether they can build and operate "peaking" plants
by June 1.
The utilities weren't immediately available to comment.
On the other hand, the ISO - which is on the verge of signing contracts for
440 peaking units with between 20 and 91 megawatts of electricity - says
the commission's meddling could endanger any chance of additional resources
coming on line in time.
"Any further interference on the state level could destroy the plan
altogether," said an ISO source close to the issue. "There is no guarantee
the utilities will be able to pull this off by next summer. And if the
whole project is scrapped, you can expect there will be blackouts."
Interference by federal regulators has already cost the ISO two
participants and nearly 600 megawatts in its peaking program.
Calpine Corp. (CPN) and Enron (ENE) initially agreed to build peaking
plants for the ISO next summer, but withdrew their offers after the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission proposed capping the clearing price for
California's wholesale electricity market at $150 a megawatt-hour.
The ISO, which operates one of the state's wholesale power markets and
manages most of the high-voltage transmission grid, has already solicited
and received bids from merchant generators for 1,800 megawatts of new
peaking power for next summer.
Burned by the summer's power crisis and facing an 8,000-MW shortfall next
summer, the ISO put out a request for bids in August. The ISO's board voted
Oct. 30 to enter into the contracts, which it estimated would cost about
$250 million a year for three years.
The state's Electricity Oversight Board, which oversees the performance of
the ISO, and the Public Utilities Commission protested the decision on the
grounds that the contracts were too expensive.
The commission is also questioning whether there is even a need for peaking
power next summer and, if there is, whether the ISO should handle the
solicitation.
"The question also arises as to whether the ISO - which is empowered only
to operate the state's transmission system and which does not represent the
state or its consumers - is the appropriate organization to plan, solicit
and pay for the construction of new power plants across the state," the
commission wrote in its Nov. 2 order.
Ind the end, the decision is up to state regulators. If utilities can come
up with a cheaper alternative and if the regulators determine that
additional generation is needed by next summer, then they will follow
through with the utilities proposal.


Bill,

I think you are about to become my new best friend!

We have another long standing counterparty we cannot get approved on
EnronOnline because we cannot get the counterparty set up in GCP.  The
Counterparty sent in a Password Application styled:  Koch Industries, Inc.,
acting through its Koch Hydrocarbon Company Division.  (Which also happens to
be the same styling on the Master Swap Agreement we have in place with this
Counterparty.)

They way I understand it, GCP has the two following Counterparties already
set up:  (1) Koch Industries, Inc., and (2) Koch Hydrocarbon Company Division.

The EnronOnline Team has been trained to never set up a company as a
division, to always send the Password Application back to the Counterparty
and try to get the Counerparty to resubmit the application with the legal
incorporated name as part of the counterparty name, which they sucessfully
did in this instance, but now we cannot get the counterparty set up in GCP.

Can you help us?!!!


See you at 11:30 in the Hyatt lobby.

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
04/05/2000 03:01 PM
To: Michael J Popkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sorry

Monday 4/10 looks fine.

Vince

Michael J Popkin@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/05/2000 02:55 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sorry

Vince,

I am not totally clear from your note on your availability.  Are you free
next Monday (4/10)?

Michael

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
04/05/2000 02:45 PM
To: Michael J Popkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Sorry

Michael,

Next week starting Friday. Outr on Thu and Fri.

Vince

Michael J Popkin@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/05/2000 12:54 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sorry

Vince,

Sorry about lunch yesterday.  I hope you got the message in time that I was
out sick.  I'd like to rescheduel.  When are you free?

Michael


Howdy,

West is best, I guess, (and apparently now more ethnically mixed?)

Trip to Washington sounds great.  Once when I was there, maybe 5 or 6 years
ago, I had the opportunity to visit a congresswomen's office, as I knew an
intern there.  Was, among other things, escorted to the Capital
building(through tunnels that lead under the Mall from the various office
buildings to the Capital building) where I saw a few hours of a
Congressional debate on one of the many campaign reform bills that have
passed through those (not so hallowed?) halls.  The debate very interesting,
not the least reason being that it was made before only a couple dozen of
the 500 or so congresspeople (the rest, I was told, were monitoring the
debate on TVs in their offices).  At the few times that a quorum of the
members actually have to be present (for, say, an impeachment vote), a bell
rings and congresspeople hustle through the above mentioned tunnels to
register their vote, after which they hustle back.  It's something to see.
Good luck with the application.

YOU MUST, while in DC, see the Holocaust Museum.  I Mean MUST.  Should make
reservation (probably can use the Internet), as I understand it's booked up
far in advance.  The museum's right off the Mall so is conveniently located.
  The most powerful museum I've ever been too.

Turkish course finishes in two weeks.  Then to Israel during first week of
April, to Italy during second week.

Bursa was very impressive.  Not nearly as dilapidated as (most of) Istanbul.
  Was the first capital of the Ottoman Empire, so there are important
historical buildings from, among other centuries, the 13th.  Now, a bit of a
sprawl, and industrial. The city center sits at the bottom of the slope of a
huge mountain (its ragged, snowcapped peak breaking out of the clouds
periodically), and thus there are fine views in both directions.

More later,

Love,

Mark

>From: TOMSKILLJR@aol.com
>To: markskilling@hotmail.com
>CC: ermak@gte.net, tskilling@tribune.com
>Subject: March Madness
>Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:39:14 EST
>
>       Hi Mark;   The basketball tournaments are really starting.  The high
>school Class A ended last night with a down state school winning.  I never
>heard of the school (Pleasant Plains 34-2)  Aurora West made the Sweet
>Sixteen and is in the Supersectional against Glenbard South (27-2).   West
>was 28-1.  I overheard some old-timers in the pool at LeBeau's say this is
>the best team ever at West.  They were ranked 4th in the Trib pole of
>Chicago
>teams but as you know anything can happen now.
>      Illinois plays Michigan State this afternoon for the championship in
>the
>Big Ten Tournament.  MS is favored but IS has been strong at the end of the
>season.  The NCAA Tournament Line up will be announced this evening.
>       The temperatures have gone back to below freezing at night but no
>ice
>on the lake and I doubt there will be for the rest of the spring.  The
>grass
>and willow trees on the golf are green but that is a false sign for this
>early.  They did announce this was the warmest winter ever.
>       I read about a seminar in Washington that is 5 days long at the end
>of
>May which is for senior citizens and covers the operation of the Federal
>Government.   The problem is the cost and you need a recommendation from
>your
>congressman.  I can handle the costs and I wrote a letter to Denny Hastert
>requesting his support.  I put in my background and how I would expect to
>use
>what I learned.  These seminars are run by a private foundation covering
>various groups of citizens on many government programs.  This one is for us
>older ones and I am sure heavy on senior citizen interests.  I hand
>delivered
>my letter to Hastert's office in Batavia to see if they needed more from
>me.
>The woman who handles the requests for this seminar will not be in until
>tomorrow.  There isn't a definite limit to this program except the
>participants act as interns and would spend a day in the congressman's
>office
>and they don't usually have more than 2 or 3.  Also paying all your own
>expenses limits the applications.  I probably won't know about acceptance
>until early April.   Since I would be considered an intern do you think I
>might meet Bill's intern Monica?
>       Your E-mail came while I was writing this one.  That will save me
>giving you a little push as it had been a while especially after knowing
>you
>had sick spell.  I gave your note a quick look and it will be interesting
>so
>I will answer after the Illinois game.
>       LOTS of LOVE and KISSES from MOTHER and I         DAD

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Attendees:

Todd Busby
Morris Clark
Wes Colwell
Joe Deffner
Dave Delainey
Tim Detmering
Jeff Donahue
Steve Douglas
Rodney Faldyn
Mark Frevert
Mark Haedicke
John Lavorato
Lisa Mellencamp
Sheila Tweed
Chuck Ward
Greg Whalley


thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitry, Dirk
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: June 2001.xls

Monika

For your information, the enclosed spreadhseet


-Kevin Kindall


Ditto Credit.

Thanks,

Shari

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 05:45 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/14/01 05:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached.


On February 14, 2000, Enron North America (Enron) filed a declaratory
judgment action against the Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA") in the Federal
District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Chattanooga Division,
requesting that the court determine whether TVA defaulted under its power
purchase agreement with Enron by failing to pay undisputed invoices.  On
March 6, TVA filed a counterclaim against Enron alleging that Enron
wrongfully terminated the power purchase agreement.  Although no assurances
can be given, Enron believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results
of operations.


Can you make it negative?  We need to reduce our payment.

Daren J Farmer@ECT
02/15/2001 01:40 PM
To: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: PanEnergy 9/00

Done.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           02/15/2001 01:09 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PanEnergy 9/00

I finally heard back from Duke regarding Sept 2000.  They agree with our
spreadsheet, so I need a demand fee to adjust the price in Sitara.

Deal 157288 - demand fee of ($8,745.69)

Thanks,
Megan


John,

Yes. I have additional info about this transaction.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/16/2000 10:47 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

Thanks Vince - I understand we are on at 1PM your time today to review this.

John

Vince J Kaminski
16/05/2000 14:48
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

John,

Sorry for the confusion.
This is a second  tanker on which very few details
are available . The LNG group is working as we speak
to provide some information for Joe Sutton before
his departure for Paris this (Tuesday) afternoon.
There is no DASH on this 2nd tanker yet. I asked Dave Gorte
on Monday to send me one and was not told that
he can provide me with the Mystic Lady DASH as  the closest
substitute.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/16/2000 12:20 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

Vince - thanks for the update.  What I am not sure of is what if any decision
has to be
made on May 19.  It seems to me that the Mystic Lady and Elba Island deals
have already
been approved and executed - but it is quite likely I am missing a detail or
two.

John

Vince J Kaminski
15/05/2000 17:14
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG May 19 decision

John,

This is the update on what I have done for the LNG transactions.

1. I was not involved in the LNG ship project. I shall  read the DASH
and give you my comments. Without looking at the details, I think that the
decision
to charter a tanker removes one significant risk we have at the Elba Island
project (please, see point 2).

2. Elba Island. I am working with Doug Rotenberbg, Brad Hitch, Scott Earnest
(Sally Beck's organization) and RAC to set up the book for the Elba Island
transaction. The next step
will be to expand the book to capture all the Enron's LNG-related  positions
in one place and
to look for natural risk offsets and possible hedges. A working group is
meeting to close a few
remaining gaps  tomorrow (Tuesday) at 8:30.

A few comments on the book design and my view of the project:

a. The current thinking is that LNG will be sourced for the Elba Island
facility
by buying marginal cargos on the fob basis. Marginal cargos will represent
supply from excess capacity that has not been committed under long-term
contracts or became available due to some short-term frictions.

The fob cargos are typically selling at a significant discount to the
long-term
contract prices. The economics of the deal, as represented by the book we are
setting up, will reflect the assumption that not only we can locate marginal
cargos
but that we shall be able to do it on a regular basis, arranging shipping and
coordinating
the facility schedule and natural gas transactions in the US. In other words,
we have a significant logistical and operational risk in this transaction.

b. The transaction will cover the period of 17 years (with an extension
option of
5 years). Even if we can lock-in the LNG volumes over this time period, we
have no ability to lock-in the other side of the spread (US gas prices) for
such a long tenor. This is
essentially a tolling transaction with exposure to the LNG - nat gas spread
and
I would not recommend locking-in only one leg of the spread.

One solution would be to  cover, let's say, 50% of he LNG volumes for the
first
5 years and lock-in the nat gas side on the US market side.

c. The book we are setting up will be based on many managerial assumptions
regarding sources of LNG, shipping rates, schedules, etc. I would set up a
big prudence reserve
in case we mark it to market.

d. My group will work on valuation of some options we have in the Elba Island
deal
(that are good for Enron) and on the hedging strategy for the LNG positions.
Long-term LNG contracts are typically based on the Japanese Crude Cocktail
that
correlates very well with Brent.

Vince

John Sherriff
05/14/2000 01:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: LNG May 19 decision

Vince

I haven't spoken to you for awhile but hope the world is treating you well.
Anyway with Greg moving to his
new role I have (I hope only temporarily) staff trading oversight for the
Eastern Hemishere plus LNG.

I understand that your group is taking a first cut at developing curves for
LNG and LNG ship values.   I also understand
that another LNG ship decision is on the dockets for May 19 (not very far
away).  Anway I understand this
is a big decision but I still have gotten very little info yet.  Can you
please let me know where you stand now?

I will ask my assistant Lauren to set up a time that I can speak with you in
the next couple of days and if you
have anything for me to review before then she can get it faxed to me as well.

Look forward to connecting with you Vince.

John


I will be on vacation this Thursday and Friday, March 22 and 23, returning
Monday March 26

Since Gary Lamphier is also on vacation on those days, these are my contact
numbers:

pager  800-503-3668

vacation house 863-420-1657

Additionally, I'll be checking my voicemail regularly

Thanks

Lee


Sally, Bob

FYI - Nice note from the Chicago office regarding the roll-out and training
in Unify. As you might know they are live on September 1 with Unify.
Currently they are only pathing on NGPL but we expect them to expand to
include both Trunkline and Northern Border. They have elected not to EDI
until  they get more comfortable with the system (maybe for October
business).

We will continue to develop their staff on the use of Unify through
additional training as noted below - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
09:05 AM ---------------------------

Richard Tomaski@ENRON
08/30/2000 06:16 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laura Luce, Barbara G Dillard/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: PGL unify training

Bob-

Just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that Richard Pinion's unify
training secession was very sucessful.  The PGL employees that he trained
were very complementary of Richard and they now feel confident that they will
be able to use our system.   They are already looking forward to his return
visit in September.

Thankyou for your involvement with the Chicago office and our implementation
of the Unify system.

Richard


Please set up some time with Linda.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001
11:39 AM ---------------------------

Norm Spalding@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/16/2001 02:26 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Linda Uselman/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: EES

Steve, I'm not sure if you remember me, but I was the gentleman that talked
to you at the Floor Meeting on April 18th for ETS personnel.

If you remember, I mentioned that some of our engineering people had
transferred to EES last year and that now they all want back due to the mass
confusion in that organization such as billings being done on Excel
spreadsheets, no one being allowed to talk to other groups, etc. etc.

Today, one of these employees, Linda Uselman, paid me a visit to inform me of
her resignation from EES.  I mentioned to Linda about my discussion with you
and she said she would very much like to share with you what is going on in
EES.

Linda was one of our best employees.  While we hated to see her go to EES, we
thought this was for the good of Enron.  Now we see that everyone lost on
this deal.

Thanks, Norm


M, these deals should show up in Unify by lunchtime today.

Sherry, you guys should see this after lunch.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 08:32
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
03/01/2000 05:00 PM
To: Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bay State Meter bounce fee

Meredith, please path deal 209359 with 209371 for Jan 31.  This should
capture the meter bounce fee ENA owes Bay State.

Sherry, I don't remember who gave me this invoice.  I will leave it on your
desk.


10/20/2001

REMINDER: EES Maine Quarterly Disclosure Label to Residential and Small Non-Residential Consumers is due 12/1/01 1:00:00 AM.  Please provide Heather
Mathis with the information to update this label for which you are responsible (if any) by 11/10/01 1:00:00 AM.  If you would like to see the form of
this label or have other questions, please email Heather at hmathis@enron.com or call her at (713) 853-9006.  Thank you!

Automated Reminder


Please add to the list as number three.    Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 05:25 PM -----

	Peter Keohane
	Sent by: Sharon Crawford
	10/26/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Top Legal Risks

Mark, on reflection, I think that there is currently only one legal risk
within Enron Canada that would warrant being added to the top legal risks for
ENA, which is the Alberta Sundance "B" PPA acquired in the Alberta PPA
auction in August, 2000.

I would suggest the description attached.

Regards,
Peter

Janette Elbertson
10/24/2000 08:47 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Top Legal Risks

Mark Haedicke requested I forward the attached document to you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


This is in follow-up to the deal transfer matter we discussed this morning.

Julie Meyers called me and stated that Tom Martin had called her to put the
deal transfer from HPL to ENA on hold till Monday; however, she had already
moved them in the system.  I asked her to find out if the deals had been
confirmed under HPL and if so, I would need to prepare a document to transfer
them from HPL to ENA.  She agreed to send me a list of the deals that had
been moved and whether or not they had been documented with the
counterparty.  Apparently, they had been and Jennifer Blay has now
redocumented two of the deals as ENA deals.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 03:03 PM -----

	Julie Meyers
	10/13/2000 02:09 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HPLC TO ENA DEALS

Attached are the confirmations that went out under HPLC.  Jennifer has
reconfirmed Forest Oil under ENA already.  I will followup with you Monday
after Tom meets with legal.

,,,,

If you have any questions, let me know.

Thanks!!

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 02:02
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Blay                           10/13/2000 01:44 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPLC TO ENA DEALS

confirms have been sent under HPLC

Julie Meyers
10/13/2000 11:26 AM
To: Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPLC TO ENA DEALS

Apparently there is some concern of these deals being moved.  Dan Hyvl would
like to know if the following deals have been confirmed already under HPLC.

Duke Energy - Q04182
Duke Energy - NZ7880
Western Gas Resources - Q10831
Duke Energy - Q04119
Forest Oil Corp -  Q22828

If they have let me know.  I need to send something to Dan and some others.

Thanks!!

Julie'


Here is the latest LM 6000 model.  Let go through it this afternoon.  Thanks

Ben


Sara,

The document attached below titled "114conf.doc", does not pertain to Vitro,
I think it was attached by accident.
Can you resend us the appropriate documents please.
Thanks,

Susan Flynn@ECT
06/08/2000 05:29 PM
To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Vitro Corporativo

 Rod - Please review the attached documents and advise Sara if acceptable
from a credit standpoint.

 Souad -  Once Sara and Rod say docs are Ok, you can dup them out for the 11
subs.  Show Sara all docs before you send them to CP.

 Sara - there is a Guarantor for Vidriera Mexico, S.A. de C.V.   The
Guarantor is --Vitro Envases Norte America, S.A. de C.V.   Rod wants it to be
an unlimited Guaranty on our form of CP GTY.   I am sending the form of GTY
to Eduardo Melo by fax tonight at fax number 011-528-378-4793.  You will need
to prepare a  form of sub deemed ISDA for this sub to include the GTY.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


do you need help?

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/30/2001 04:38 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Talking points

Hey!  I'm in Houston.  You'll have my backgrounder tomorrow.  (The way things
are going today, I'll be working on it till the wee hours tonite.)

Best,
Jeff


Please see attached a brief overview of the current legal framework for the
control of NOx emissions in the EU as well as changes under preparation.
Please note that the two EU directives which govern the current regime of NOx
emmissions abatement plan on the pan-European level only set the minimum
requirements. Nothing precludes Member States setting tighter limits on
emissions when implementing these Directives into their national legislation.


John,

This guy has been trying to get in touch with you the last few days and I have been intercepting his calls.  I told him to email me the correspondance and I would make sure you received it.  Is this anything that would be of interest to you?

-Ina

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sullivan [mailto:msullivan@prosrm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:47 PM
To: Rangel, Ina
Subject: PROS Revenue Management: Energy Profit Optimization Workshop

Dear Ina,

Please forward the following to John Armold:

John, my name is Mark Sullivan with PROS Revenue Management and we are the
world's leader in revenue management technology for the airline and energy
industries, among others.  On Monday, November 5, in Houston we will be
holding an Energy Profit Optimization Workshop which will demonstrate how
you can use revenue optimization technology to increase your revenues by
10-25% in EACH of your Trading, Transportation and Storage operations while
also reducing your operating costs.  This workshop has proven to be a
significant career enhancing event for people in the energy field,
particularly at the Senior Trader level, and I strongly encourage you to
attend.  I would be happy to tell you more about it if you would call me
back at 713-335-5812 or you can visit our website at www.prosrm.com which
provides more information, directions and free registration.

Best regards,
Mark

Mark F. Sullivan
Director Business Development
PROS Revenue Management, Inc.
email:  msullivan@prosrm.com
Ph:  (713) 335-5812, Fax:  (713) 335-8144

---------
This e-mail is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged
or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this e-mail
is prohibited.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 06:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           09/13/2000 11:54 AM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Kate
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Regulatory Filing Summary

Enclosed is the latest regulatory filing summary, as well as the latest
addtions to the Order 637 Filings.  Please note that the latest round of
Order 637 filings begins on page 9 of that attachment.


When: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS -05990

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:57 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Herndon, Rogers; Davis, Mark Dana; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Will, Lloyd; Imai, Rika; Mayor, Philip; Cuilla, Martin; Shively, Hunter S.
Cc:	Tholan, Scott; Holman, Kelly
Subject:	FW: Labor Update 6/27/01
Importance:	High

Currently getting info from Midwest - will pass it on when received
Just got word that the 250 Managers will not go on strike and will instead take over operations of the following plants:

(2) Chicago - Fisk Station and Crawford Station
(1) Pekin - Powerten
(1) Joliet - Joliet Station 9 and Station 29
(1) Morris - Kalins
(1) Romeoville - Will County
(1) Waukegan - Waukegan Station

Union workers will also walk away from 5 peaking units:
Electric Junction, Aurora
Lumbard 120, Lumbard
Seabrook, Rockford
Calumet, Chicago
Bloom, Chicago

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Wednesday, June  27, 2001 3:39 PM
To:	Walsh, Kristin
Subject:	RE: Labor Update 6/27/01

Please give the names of the plants effected ASAP.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Herndon, Rogers; Davis, Mark Dana; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Will, Lloyd; Imai, Rika; Mayor, Philip; Cuilla, Martin; Shively, Hunter S.
Cc:	Tholan, Scott
Subject:	Labor Update 6/27/01
Importance:	High

The following information is from a Union source:
Union planning to go on strike at 6am tomorrow morning  (1200 employees of which 250 are Management)
The current shift is the last prior to the strike
Meeting continue today and through out the night
A Federal mediator has been bought in to try and help the situation
The only way the Union won't go on strike is if there is a tentative agreement in place with Midwest, however, everyone involved feels these chances are slim
When a strike occurs, it will affect 7 plants


Corey,

Here's an update, I sent this to Emily earlier today.  Let me know about this
weekend (i.e. the game, tomorrow night, etc. etc.)

Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
09/21/2000 02:38 PM
To: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: We have closure! (well, sort-of)

I'm soooo good.  The chosen path was cool, indifference.

So, last night was Steak Night and with Nick and Wilson both in town we had a
really good showing.  I got there about 7:30 with Nick, and the group's size
swelled to about 12+ by 8:30 - 9:00.  About 8:00 I saw Kevin (Ted's pal - the
one you meet a steak night) wandering around LW's obviously in search of
someone.  Can you believe it?  He (Ted) knew I had organized this gathering -
I know that because Nick is working right across from he and Darren and
overheard Darren encouraging Ted's attendance (mind you Ted was not in the
email distribution) - and he had the nerve to come.  Anyway, Kevin saw me and
came over to chat.  He informed me that "our friend Ted should be there
shortly" to which I responded, "You would know better than me at this
point".  The subject was dropped until he felt the need to raise it again.
He asked if Ted and I parted on good terms/ bad terms, etc.  I said there
really weren't any terms, I just hadn't heard a peep out of him for about 2
weeks.  Kevin wanted to know if I was going to break a bottle over Ted's head
and cause a big scene.  When I said no, I think he was genuinely
disappointed.  I said in order for me to do something like that I would have
to care about the "loss" and that, while a week or two earlier I might have
cared a bit more, with each passing day the "loss" seems less and less like
much of a loss.  Kevin told me I was better-off without Ted.  To go even
further, he informed me that there is no way he would ever let a daughter of
his date Ted nor any of his "girl-friends".  He said that while he thought
Ted was a great guy (i.e. fun to be around, good stories, etc.) he wasn't
good dating material.  I agreed with Kevin saying "Ted is a great guy, he
just makes a lousy man" (don't you like that one?).  I then went on to say
"Anyway, I'm destined for bigger and better things, right?".  Kevin: "Much
bigger and much better."  About this time my parents showed up...the plot
thickens.  I introduced Kevin to my parents and since both my Dad and Kevin
were in the Navy and attended Colorado they had much to talk about.  The two
of them had probably been talking for about half an hour when
"dum-da-dum-dum" Ted shows up.  He approaches our group because he sees Kevin
and is forced to make eye-contact with me.  I give him a "hey" and he gives
me the arm squeeze and a much too pleasant "how's it going?".  He asked what
Kevin and my Dad were talking about, I told him the Navy, he said don't get
Kevin started or you'll never shut him up...Then he walked away.  He never
acknowledged my parents nor did he ever speak to me again the rest of the
evening.  The beautiful thing is Kevin stays and talks with my Dad for
another half hour and when Darren shows up he hangs out with "my group" for
quite a while before going to join Ted.  My parents and I ate our steaks
right behind Ted and then went back over to our group at the picnic table
when we were finished.  It really was a great night.  I would almost say I
was glowing (I was having so much fun with my friends and family and it
wasn't a show for Ted's benefit...I really was having a great time).  So,
when my parents decide to head out they walked over to Ted/Kevin's table to
say good-bye to Kevin.  It was awesome.  Ted's sitting right next to Kevin
while Kevin and my Dad are talking and appears to be actually shrinking in
his chair.  Yet again no acknowledgement of my parents - he couldn't even
make eye-contact.  I ended up staying there for at least another hour and
then went with a few of the guys to the Ale House.  Needless to say I was
very hung over today.  Anyway, there's the story...He's a complete and utter
ass-hole.  So I'm done.  And no, there is no way he could weasel his way back
in to my good graces.

Now on to a fun subject, my trip to London.  I bought my ticket today ( I
think I got hosed a little bit, but it was the cheapest ticket I could find -
$450 before taxes).  I will arrive at Heathrow airport around 7:00 a.m.
Friday the 6th and depart about 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday the 10th.  I'm very
excited about the trip, I really need to get out of Houston.  I leave the
activities in your capable hands.  ( bear in mind I will have to see Darren
and Nick at some point).

"Single again" Sue


Thanks.  I remember everything you have taught me!

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Ryall, Jean; Hetrick, Nancy; Keene, Patrick; Lindberg, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Ogenyi, Gloria; Twiggs, Thane
Subject: RE: Texas Legislative Oversight Committee

Nancy --

Go get 'em!!!  You'll do great.  Just be factual and explain how you've worked on these issues in multiple states.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryall, Jean
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Hetrick, Nancy; Keene, Patrick; Lindberg, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Ogenyi, Gloria; Steffes, James D.; Twiggs, Thane
Subject: RE: Texas Legislative Oversight Committee

I have spoken to Mark, he will send a list of issues to Nancy prior to the hearing.  The committee will acknowledge that you are an Enron employee, however, you are appearing in the capacity of  Chair of RMS subcomittee.  Bill B. from Ercot will be present, however he was not the most stellar witness.  Mark thinks Chairman Wolens will want to hear directly from the Chair of RMS.  The questions that you may be asked include:  what has RMS recommended to TAC, address issues of cutover from version 1.3 to 1.4...where are we, where do we go next, where are the participants on the issue?  Mark is preparing the list of questions and will email it to you soon.

Representative Paul Hilbert died last night.  If the funeral services are scheduled for Friday, the hearing will be postponed to enable the members of the committee to attend the funeral.  We may not know the date of the funeral until Wednesday.  I will let everyone know ASAP whether or not the legislative takes place on Friday.  Thanks, Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Hetrick, Nancy
Sent: Mon 10/29/2001 11:33 AM
To: Keene, Patrick; Lindberg, Susan; Nicolay, Christi L.; Ogenyi, Gloria; Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Twiggs, Thane
Cc:
Subject: Texas Legislative Oversight Committee

Mark Bruce, Policy Analyst, Electric Resturcturing Legislative Oversight Committee, attended the October 25th RMS meeting.  When he left, he gave me his card and asked me to contact him after the meeting, which I did.  He asked that I forward my contact information and asked if I could be available to attend the Legislative Oversight Committee meeting on Friday, November 2nd.  This is the email that I received from him after I sent my contact information.  He has not elaborated on exactly what questions he has or would have for me.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "MARK BRUCE_HC" <Mark.Bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us>@ENRON
Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 12:21 PM
To:     Hetrick, Nancy
Subject:        Re: Contact Information

Thanks for your response ... Connie shared her V 1.4 cutover questions and  concerns with me ... if you reply to her e-mail prior to the Wed. RMS meeting,  please include me in your reply.

I'll keep in touch with you regarding possible questions from the oversight  committee on Nov. 2.

/\/\ark Bruce
policy analyst
Electric Utility Restructuring
Legislative Oversight Committee
office: 512-463-0814
mobile: 512-576-8995
fax: 512-463-6783
e-mail: mark.bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us <<mailto:mark.bruce_hc@house.state.tx.us>>


Dave,

Attached is the market wrap for this week. Can you please edit it?

thanks,
Monika


I forgot my password to the statistical database.  Who should I contact to
find this info.?

Thanks,

Eric
3-0977


Dave

Mark just called me - 6 on 6 off from our original 12:

remaining are

AT&T
Cisco
Citizens
Constellation
Dell
MCI

M


Here is the draft.


Coops..... I'm  retarded.  :)

Valerie DeWille
Marketing Associate
503 439-7136
1 800 330-7158
valeried@timberline.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:00 AM
To: Valerie DeWille
Subject: Re: Recall:

What the hell?


Wednesday morning, June 27 (before the CPUC decision to delay the vote on DA), I gave Marty Sunde this view on exit fees and surcharges for DWR costs in the California market:

There is a 75% probability that customers who go to direct access and who used utility service between January and June 2001 will pay an exit fee calculated as the difference between market price and utility rates during that period.  The exit fee could also include the going forward costs or alternatively, those costs could be passed along in the form of a uniform surcharge.  In other words, with regard to past costs, regulators or legislators would require DA customers to pay the amount they belive had been sucked from the state during the January-June crisis period.  I said the "retroactive ratemaking" argument is a nicety that California could easily dispense with.

Now that we know the CPUC decision will be delayed, I think the probability of exit fees for retroactive costs is even higher - either the DA legislation will pass between now and July 3, or Carl Wood will change the PUC order to get the "jailbreaking" customers to pay up.


Update:  Senator Phil Gramm placed a hold on the S. 2071 late, late last
evening in order to preserve his options to serve on the Conference with a
broader House bill version.  The Senate should go out for the July 4th recess
this evening so consideration of this bill on the Senate floor will be
deferred until their return the week of July 10th.  Senators Gramm and
Schumer also intend to introduce their electricity restructuring bill this
evening.

Cynthia Sandherr
06/28/2000 06:16 PM

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, awenner@velaw.com, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Hap
Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: S. 2071, Senator Gorton's Reliability bill

Late this afternoon, the Senate "hotlined" S. 2071, Senator Gorton's (R-WA)
Reliability legislation.   Thus, this bill is likely to  be passed by the
Senate and referred to the House under unanimous consent late this evening or
tomorrow at the latest.  This provides a Conference vehicle with the House.
Senator Gramm intends to hold his PUHCA bill from Senate floor consideration
until the House acts.

During the week of July 10th, the House plans full Commerce Committee mark-up
of H.R. 2944, the Subcommittee passed bill, with the exception of striking
the section 101 Transmission language and replacing it with something along
the lines of the Chairman Bliley's transmission draft sent to you last
Friday.  As you recall, Enron opposes the H.R. 2944 Section 101 transmission
language but supports the Bliley draft language.  Thus, this is a positive
development.  Drafting continues with Subcommittee Chairman Barton willing to
accept the Bliley transmission language provided he gains some flexibility in
terms of a state grievance body and some additional means for state rate
setting influence.  Perhaps a directed rulemaking would address his concerns.
 We are deeply involved in the lobbying and drafting of this agreement and
hope to have late tomorrow a copy of a Bliley/Barton letter sent to all their
Committee members confirming the agreement to work together to pass
legislation this year.

Please feel free to call should you need any additional information.


(See attached file: ng061102.pdf)

This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.

                ---------------------------------------------

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.


Jim,

The answer to your timing question is yes, the audit is supposed to be completed by mid-Jan 2002, auditing the period 10/00-10/01.

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Perrino, Dave
Subject:	FW: Operational Audit of CAISO by FERC

Dave, per your request:

Here are some bullets briefly describing the FERC audit high points.  I think the scope is "right on the money" and the timing is reasonably good also.  The text of the audit solicitation follows the bullets.  I've made contact with Andy Sakallaris, head of FERC procurement, to attend the pre-bid conference next Tuesday (assuming it is held, since expressions of interest thus far have been from CA based firms unwilling to make the trip to DC).  Ray

Audit description-  FERC seeks to take all appropriate steps for prospective improvements in California markets; accordingly, an independent operational audit of the CAISO will be performed to determine any areas in which the CAISO could enhance its effectiveness in fulfilling its responsibilities in operating the transmission system under its control and administering real-time energy markets.

Scope- Provide a comparison of the CAISO's actual operations and its FERC tariff and determine whether the CAISO's operations are adequately transparent to market participants.

Audit period- 10/1/00-10/1/01

Deliverables timing- Draft report due on January 9, 2002; final report due January 16, 2002.

Audit schedule-  Begins on November 1, 2001, and ends no later than January 4, 2002.

Pre-proposal conference- A conference is scheduled for prospective offerors at FERC next Tuesday; FERC will give a brief explanation of the requirements and clarify any questions asked.

PART: U.S. GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENTS
SUBPART: SERVICES
CLASSCOD: R--Professional, Administrative and Management Support
  Services
OFFADD: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), 888 First
  Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426
SUBJECT: R--OPERATIONAL AUDIT OF CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM
  OPERATIOR. INC. CAISO
SOL FERC02RMT22071
DUE 102601
POC Charlotte Handley, 202-219-1156 or Andrew Sakallaris,202-219-1150
DESC: This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial
  items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6,
  as supplemented with additional information included in this
  notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation;
  proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will
  not be issued. FERC02RMT22071 is issued as a request for proposal
  and all provisions/clauses are those in effect through FAC
  97-27. This solicitation is unrestricted under NAICS number
  561. Statement of Work: I. BACKGROUND. The California electricity
  market has experienced great stress from Summer 2000 to Summer
  2001, with demand outstripping supply, wholesale prices rising
  dramatically, and key market participants becoming financially
  unstable. As a result, the California Independent System Operator,
  Inc. (CAISO), which operates the electricity transmission grid
  throughout most of California, was forced to adapt to rapidly
  changing circumstances. During all of this, the CAISO worked
  hard to ensure system reliability. Under the Federal Energy
  Regulatory Commission's market mitigation plan, wholesale prices
  stabilized in California in Summer 2001. The Commission seeks
  to take all appropriate steps for prospective improvements
  in California markets, including improvements to help the CAISO
  in effectively performing its increasing responsibilities.
  Accordingly, an independent operational audit of the CAISO
  will be performed to determine the areas, if any, in which
  the CAISO could enhance its effectiveness in fulfilling its
  responsibilities in operating the transmission system under
  its control and administering certain real-time energy markets.
  II. SCOPE OF WORK. The Independent Public Accounting (Contractor)
  firm shall perform an operational audit of the CAISO processes,
  practices, and procedures in accordance with Generally Accepted
  Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS). The Contractor shall
  provide a comparison of the CAISO's actual operations and its
  Commission tariff (procedures and tariff can be found at www.caiso.com).
  The Contractor shall ascertain whether the CAISO's operations
  are adequately transparent to market participants. To the extent
  possible, the Contractor shall also ascertain whether the CAISO's
  procedures and operations are consistent with the most effective
  business practice. III. AUDIT PERIOD. The audit of the CAISO
  shall cover the period commencing October 1, 2000, through
  October 1, 2001. IV. DELIVERABLES. The contractor must provide
  the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) with a draft
  and final report detailing the findings, operating deficiencies
  and/or major observations and recommendations. These reports
  and other deliverables must be provided to the COR by the close
  of business on the following dates: 1) Draft Report - January
  9, 2002 2) Final Report - January 16, 2002. V. SCHEDULE. The
  operational audit will commence on November 1, 2001, and it
  must be completed no later than January 4, 2002. The contractor
  shall meet with the COR to discuss the audit no later than
  November 6, 2001. The contractor must provide the Commission
  with an operational audit plan no later than November 14, 2001.
  A detailed operational audit plan will be submitted to the
  COR for review, feedback, and approval. The COR or designated
  representative will review the plan. VI. Working Papers. The
  contractor shall prepare and provide a copy of work papers
  in accordance with GAGAS. All work papers shall include the
  purpose, sources of information, the procedures performed,
  results thereof, and conclusions as appropriate for the planning,
  internal control, compliance, and substantive testing phases.
  For all findings, work papers shall clearly show the condition
  or problem, criteria, cause, effect, and recommendation for
  improvement. All working papers shall be cross-referenced to
  audit programs, summaries, and final audit report. These documents
  will become the property of the Commission. During the course
  of the audit or upon completion of the audit work, the Contractor's
  audit report and work papers shall be subject to access and
  review by the Commission. A preproposal conference is scheduled
  for prospective offerors at FERC on Tuesday, October 16, 2001,
  at 10:00 am at 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426,
  Room 3M-3. FERC will give a brief explanation of the requirements
  and clarify any questions asked. Questions submitted in advance
  to A. Sakallaris (andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us) is appreciated
  and preferable. Contractual, technical, and legal representatives
  will be on hand to answer any questions. Bring no more than
  three representatives and E-mail or phone A. Sakallaris, 202-219-1150
  to indicate the number and names of individuals attending.
  If unable to attend, E-Mail A. Sakallaris and provide the point
  of contact's mailing and E-mail address and FERC will arrange
  to deliver any additional information that may become available
  as a result of the pre-proposal conference. All offerors and
  subcontractors will complete and submit with their proposals,
  either the Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) representation
  or the OCI disclosure (not both). Complete and submit the OCI
  Questionnaire. Request OCI information from A. Sakallaris.
  See DOE clauses 952.209-8 OCI-Disclosure and 952.209-72 OCI.
  Same/similar language will be incorporated into the resultant
  contract. Period of Performance: From approximately November
  1, 2001 to January 16, 2002. FAR Provision 52.212-1, Instructions
  to Offerors-Commercial (Oct 2000), applies. Addendum to FAR
  52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH (b) Reply by e- mail the proposal to
  FERC, ATTN: C. Handley, Division of Procurement, FA-12, 888
  First St, NE, Wash DC 20426, e-mail: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us.
  It is our intent to evaluate based on initial proposals. Offerors
  shall submit five copies of their price and technical proposal,
  signed by an official authorized to bind the offeror, at the
  above address no later than 2:00 PM local time, Friday, October
  26, 2001. Price Proposal: Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH
  (b)(6): The price proposal shall be completely separate from
  the technical proposal. Offerors must breakout pricing by month
  and provide (1) labor categories (2) corresponding firm-fixed-price,
  fully loaded labor rates (3) proposed number of hours estimated
  for each labor category (4) Other Direct Costs as applicable
  (subcontractor and travel). Supporting details shall also be
  provided as appropriate (e.g., travel destinations, number
  of trips, computer time, discounts offered (excluding prompt
  payment)). Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 SUBPARAGRAPH (c) The offeror
  agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar
  days. Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items (Jan
  1999), applies. Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 SUBPARAGRAPH, (a)
  Technical Proposal: Past Performance (30 points). Ensure that
  the company names, points of contact and phone numbers are
  current. The Offeror and each subcontractor proposed must each
  select three references to complete a "Contractor Past-Performance
  Evaluation." All areas of the sheet must be filled in. If an
  answer to a specific question is not provided, the applicable
  area must be annotated with the reason why (e.g. "Reference
  failed to provide an answer"). Higher scores will be assigned
  for contracts that are at least similar in size and complexity.
  FERC may obtain and evaluate information from sources other
  than those provided by the offeror. FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) states
  "In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past
  performance or for whom information on past performance is
  not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or
  unfavorably on past performance." For the purposes of this
  evaluation not being evaluated favorably or unfavorably means
  the offeror will receive a rating of "good or acceptable" on
  company past performance. To obtain a copy of the past performance
  form to be completed by the Offeror's references, request from
  A. Sakallaris by email. The Offeror will be responsible and
  ensure that the references submit or reply by e-mail their
  completed response to C. Handley, located at the above address
  by 2:00 PM local time, October 26, 2001. Offerors should also
  notify the references that FERC may be contacting them regarding
  the past performance information. Prior Audit Experience (25
  points). The offeror must cover in its proposal the extent
  of prior related experience in electric bulk power markets,
  and the ability to effectively and efficiently conduct this
  operational audit in accordance with GAGAS. The proposal must
  include previous and/or current experience, within the last
  3 years, where the offeror has performed audits similar in
  terms of size and complexity of this requirement. Higher scores
  will be assigned to those offerors who have demonstrated successful
  experience in electric bulk power markets within the last three
  years. To be acceptable, the services must have been satisfactorily
  performed and at least similar in terms of size and complexity
  to the work required under this contract. Understanding the
  Statement of Work (20 points). The proposal must clearly demonstrate
  in sufficient and precise detail the offeror's expertise in
  understanding and analyzing independent system operator tariffs,
  market operations and services, and transmission issues. The
  offeror must describe its ability to perform a comprehensive
  and thorough analysis of the electric bulk power market operated
  by the CAISO. Higher scores will be assigned to those offerors
  who demonstrate an understanding and greater knowledge of independent
  system operator tariffs, market operations and services, and
  transmission issues. Higher scores will also be assigned to
  offerors who demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of bulk
  power markets like those operated by the CAISO. Audit Methodology
  and Quality Control (15 points). The technical proposal must
  include the audit methodology and must address each phase of
  the audit. The proposal must identify specific aspects of each
  phase and explain how each phase/aspect is related. The offeror
  must include estimated completion times for each phase of the
  audit and address critical completion dates. The technical
  proposal must describe the audit approach to documenting systems
  and internal controls, and effective procedures, including
  consideration of risk and materiality, to determine the extent
  of audit testing. Quality control is an important part of the
  technical proposal. The proposal must demonstrate the offeror's
  internal quality control procedures. The proposal must include
  a copy of the firm's latest peer review report, comments, and
  the response to the peer review report. Higher scores will
  be assigned to those offerors who demonstrate and offer a sound,
  valid, effective, and innovative audit methodology that reflects
  an understanding of the statement of work. "Valid" entails
  the use of techniques that are known to be feasible with respect
  to the area addressed; "Effective" refers to the workability
  and appropriateness of the methodology. "Innovative" means
  the development and application of a novel, yet valid technique
  that will increase the effectiveness of the approach. Higher
  scores will be assigned to offerors who demonstrate sound and
  effective internal quality control procedures. Professional
  Qualifications (10 points). The offeror must describe in its
  proposal: 1) the professional qualifications of the staff that
  will be assigned to this contract and 2) demonstrate that it
  has sufficient resources to perform the audit and qualified
  staff to perform critical tasks necessary to support the audit.
  The written response must also include the following information
  for all staff participating on the audit: Labor Category (i.e.,
  Partner, Manager, etc.); CPA certification date (if applicable);
  Other applicable certification(s); Total years of audit and/or
  other experience; Advance degree(s) obtained; and Total years
  employed by the offeror. Higher scores will be based on offeror's
  educational background, recent work experience, and certifications
  obtain by their staff. In particular, higher scores will be
  given to those who offer recent experience with independent
  system operator tariffs, market operations and services, transmission
  issues, and bulk power markets like those operated by the CAISO.
  Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 SUBPARAGRAPH (a). Technical and past
  performance, when combined, are more important than price.
  However, award shall be made to the offeror whose proposal
  is determined to best meet the needs of the Government after
  consideration of all factors i.e., provides the "best value."
  "Best value," for the purpose of the contract is defined as
  the procurement process that results in the most advantageous
  acquisition decision for the Government and is performed through
  an integrated assessment and trade-off analysis between technical
  and price factors. Include a completed copy of Provision at
  52.212.3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial
  Items (May 2001) with offer. Clause 52.212-4, Contract Terms
  and Conditions-Commercial Items (May 2001), applies. Addendum
  to FAR 52.212-4: 1. 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference
  (FEB 1998). This contract incorporates one or more clauses
  by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were
  given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will
  make their full text available. Clauses are as follows: 52.217-8
  and 52.217-9. Clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions
  Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial
  Items (May 2001) applies. Addendum to FAR 52.212-5: The following
  clauses are incorporated by reference: 52.203-6 with A1; 52.219-4;
  52.219-8; 52.222-21; 52.222-26; 52.222-35; 52-222-36; 52.222-37;
  52.225-13; 52.225-15; 52.225-16; 52.232-33; 52.239-1. E-mail
  questions to C. Handley at charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us. no
  later than October 19, 2001. E-Mail C. Handley of your intent
  to submit a proposal no later than October 19, 2001.
LINKURL: andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us
LINKDESC: Click here to request copies of OCI questionnaire and <andrew.sakallaris@ferc.fed.us>
  the past performance form
EMAILADD: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us
EMAILDESC: charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us <mailto:charlotte.handley@ferc.fed.us>
CITE: (W-282 SN5102V8)


just remembered that my folks are in connecticutt.  if you want to go to the
game, i'll go with you.  can you call me (from a land line phone)?

Prentice Sellers <psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 09/08/2000 02:58:45 PM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Niner Game

Hi.  Cameron can't go to the game -- she's in Boston.  I don't have anyone
to go with me.  My dad is planning on selling the tickets to someone he
doesn't even know.  Do you want to find out if anyone in your family wants
to use them?  He needs to know in the next half hour.


Just practicing apathy.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
07:52 PM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/19/2001 11:28 AM
To: "Delainey, David"
<IMCEAEX-_O=ENRON_OU=NA_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=NOTESADDR_CN=E62E126D-6E2B3722-862565
A8-71D1A3@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Capital Charge Allocation

Where are you?  I hear your already living the new life.  Sick last week.
Vacation this week.  Buying land in Colorado next week?

Lavo
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Delainey, David
[mailto:IMCEAEX-_O=ENRON_OU=NA_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=NOTESADDR_CN=E62E126D-6E2B3722
-862565A8-71D1A3@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Subject: Re: FW: Capital Charge Allocation

John, I spoke to Milly - he is on side.  I have completed all reviews except
Kishkill and Orlando - how do you want to handle this?

Regards
Delainey


I thought you would like that. We've been working the homeboy language in the
broker market all week. You diss'n me? I'll bust a cap in your ass.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
01:13 PM ---------------------------

Judy Hernandez on 08/25/99 02:56:43 PM
To: Shauncy Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirlet Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Edwards/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Warren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rose Botello/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Precious

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/25/99 02:54
PM ---------------------------

Maria Sandoval
08/25/99 01:56 PM
To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Pamela
Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ana
Correa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Precious

This is cute........
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 08/25/99 01:53
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com>
       08/25/99 01:43 PM

To: "'Castillo, Margaret'" <MCastillo@metromkt.com>, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ursula Tovar <Ursula.Tovar@Halliburton.com>, Patty
Soria <Patty.Soria@Halliburton.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Precious

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

-----  <<Microsoft PowerPoint 97>>

 - precious.pps


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30331
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 05/07/2002
STOP_TIME = 05/07/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 05/06/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 05/06/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = for question, please call (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


Tommorrow at 2:00 or later works for me.  Thanks

Erica Braden
07/21/99 12:46 PM
To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wende Warren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reviews

Barbara would like to conduct reviews on Thursday and Friday of this week.
Please e-mail me at your earliest convenience to let me know what time I can
schedule your review.  Reviews will be conducted during the hours of 9:30 -
4:30 and will last approximately 30 minutes each.

Thanks, E.


Done

cg

-----Original Message-----
From: Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:39 PM
To: George, Carolyn
Subject: FW: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for harlan.murphy@enron.com

please approve

-----Original Message-----
From: ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 11/30/2001 7:26 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Cc:
Subject: Your Approval is Overdue: Access Request for harlan.murphy@enron.com

This request has been pending your approval for  11 days.  Please click <http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076416&Page=Approval> to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076416

Request Create Date : 11/16/01 4:03:20 PM

Requested For       : harlan.murphy@enron.com

Resource Name       : LiveLink CORP

Resource Type       : Applications


Sorry to miss your birthday. Did you have one in my honor?  You know I really
did have one for you on vacation.

Points well taken - some we have already addressed, others probably need to
be tied up better.

See you soon.

By the way, it hailed in DC today. Looked good from the bar at the Willard.

Kay


When: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ESC 04 105

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Fallon, DiMichele, Pearce, Todd Hall, Kent Castleman, Kevin Sweeney, Shonna Wilson, Jeff Gossett, Scott Mills, Stacy White, Kristin Albrecht

Topic:  DPR for 11/30 and subsequent dates


<<2SX8RED.DOC>>  <<2T2901!.DOC>>  <<2T2$01!.DOC>>

We have enclosed drafts of the following documents:

1.  Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development I (marked
to reflect revisions from the draft circulated 01/02/01);
2.  Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II -
Turbine (clean copy identical to the amendment for CA/ED-I except for the
name of the LLC in the reference clause); and
3.  Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II -
Transformer (marked to reflect revisions from the amendment for CA/ED-I);

Please advise of any further comments at your earliest convenience.  Thank
you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 130796vR2/1
  130977v1
  130979v1 R 130796v2

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2SX8RED.DOC
 - 2T2901!.DOC
 - 2T2$01!.DOC


Have a great holiday!


Ken/Jeff:

As part of the Culture Committee discussions, "Leadership" has been identified as an area of concern at Enron.  There are of course many definitions of leadership and, as such, we would like to define leadership as it applies to Enron's culture and business objectives.  As a result, we think it is important to meet with each of you to discuss your views of how "leadership at Enron" should be defined.  We believe the best way to achieve this end is to discuss with each of you:

1.  The criteria you used to choose Enron's current business leaders.

2.  The attributes you believe Enron's leaders should possess.

3.  Whether or not and to what extent you believe leadership impacts the bottom line at Enron?

We would prefer to have this discussion with both of you together.  But that may be an impossible task.  I will speak with each of your assistants to arrange a convenient time to discuss these issues.

Thanks

Sean


I'll be in the office very shortly.  My converstation with Fielder (SCE SVP I've been talking to about the PX credit) yesterday afternoon regarding the settlement was not very fulfilling:

he said there's still disagreement about what they owe us for the PX credit
he made a point to include in our conversation the provision in the settlement that requires Edison to "cooperate" with the AG and the PUC in litigation against generators/marketers

I told him that we needed to get the payment issue resolved very quickly.  He said that they needed a day or two to regroup and that they intended to call each and every creditor to discuss next steps.

Michael:  I call you soon as I get in--next 15-30 minutes.

Best,

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Wed 10/3/2001 12:14 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: sce-urgent

reliant guy, mike jines, called me about the deal with the cpuc. he thinks they will get injured and that sce will just continue the same path of doing nothing for the generators and the marketers.
he wants to talk mid-morning houston time after we've digested for our view.
with the settlement of the filed rate case, what does that do for us re the ctc claim? presumably they would pay as there would be no argument not to. am i in the right place? i hate to be too logical here. jeff saw your earlier email re your discussions but i've been in another crisis. need to decide what to do tomorrow, or, i realize, TODAY, AS IT IS NOW AFTER MIDNIGHT. michael, can you get with jeff early and start getting  our view as i finish the other crisis stuff first in the am???


1-D theta included, document updated.


CUIABA
Furnas: Nothing particularly new to report since last week, other than it appears we are likely to get the consent documents signed Tuesday or Wednesday. These documents reflect a resolution to the consent issue and the Resolution 49 regulatory issues that changed some of the risks under the PPA.   As reported last week, one of the reasons Furnas/Electrobras have agreed to sign is because the two difficult issues regarding (i) the validity of the Electrobras guaranty following privatization; and (ii) political force majeure allowing a "put" option for Brazilian governmental acts, were deleted from the Furnas consent documents and will be negotiated separately with the Brazilian government over the next two weeks.  These issues must also be resolved for financing.

GT11/12:  Repairs still on schedule to meet requirements under the PPA for the changeover to gas by year end.  Siemens and our engineers will meet with the underwriters in London tomorrow to discuss the root cause of the failures.  Still no written confirmation of coverage, but we currently do not anticipate a problem.

Shell:  Preparing for mediation to be held in Toronto November 5-7.

ANNEX V

After reporting last week that the cost pass through suits had been filed, I learned that Orlando Gonzales made the commercial decision to hold off on those suits because of significant progress he made in negotiations with the Brazilian government for resolution of these issues and Annex V.

Elektro received some of the information from ASMAE for calculating its numbers; however, as of Friday it had not received the information for the rationing period, the relevant period for calculating the set off.  I talked with Vasco this morning and he believed this information was received today and will confirm.  If the information is not forthcoming, we are prepared to file a suit to compel it.

I will stay in touch with Orlando this week to determine if and when we can file these suits without interfering with his negotiations.

Regards,
   Michelle


I will be in London attending the oral hearing in the CATS appeal. I doubt I
can attend.


Per your request.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Linda J Simmons@ECT
06/13/2000 08:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: VEPCO PPA

----- Forwarded by Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
	06/12/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: <linda.j.simmons@enron.com>, <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc: "William Frederking" <wfrederking@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: VEPCO PPA

Lisa:  Attached is a draft of the Power Purchase Agreement with VEPCO, based
on the current version of the term sheet.  In preparing the draft, we did
encounter several additional questions for Enron's consideration.  These are
noted with brackets and, in some cases, italicized notes, in the draft and
are also highlighted below.  You may want to address these issues before this
goes to VEPCO.

Cover and first page-- Should the party to the agreement (for the moment) be
ENA or a special purpose company?

Definitions--  We included a defined term "Emergency Start-Up" (a start up or
increase in energy scheduled during a day) and a place in Exhibit A to
include a price for this, although this was not covered in the term sheet.

Section 2.2--  We included a provision for VEPCO to take test energy (energy
charge only; no demand charge)--do you want this?

Section 2.3--  This was taken from the term sheet, but is it correct that COD
will be July 1 (since the demand charge is supposed to start June 1?)  Also,
it would be best to define "commencement of construction" to avoid
controversy down the road.  We could either do this now or put in a
placeholder that indicates it needs to be defined or be silent, whichever is
your preference.  Also, bear in mind that we have not included a specific
remedy (e.g., liquidated damages) if the Seller does not achieve that
milestone on time.  Under the default provision (Section 8.1(c)), there would
be a 30 day period to cure before Buyer could terminate (extendible to 90
days if a longer period of time is needed and Seller diligently pursues the
cure).  Would you prefer the right to pay ld's and extend the time period?

Section 3.1(b)--  Should the 1400 hour limitation apply to all sales under
this PPA or only sales from the Facility?  I.e., would you use this Agreement
to sell to VEPCO power in addition to what would be available from the
Facility?  Also, is this a calendar year limitation--i.e., could they take
1400 hours in the period June-Dec. 2001 or does the 1400 hours need to be
pro-rated for the first year?

Section 3.4-- Since this is not a base load plant, the normal definition of
Availability as the number of hours in a year of operations compared to the
total hours in the year would not seem to be applicable.  Instead, we stated
that the Facility would be capable of being available 92% of the year (other
than due to Force Majeure and 336 hours (2 weeks) of scheduled
maintenance)--i.e., that if they tried to schedule it, it is expected to be
available.  Is that what Enron intended?  Additionally, the term sheet stated
that a remedy for failure to meet Availability would need to be agreed--why
wouldn't cost of cover damages be appropriate? Also, please note that we
included language stating that Seller will not perform maintenance during
peak periods.

Section 3.5(b)-- Please note the bracketed language re taking Blocks of
Energy.  We have 50 MW minimum blocks but the capacity is 223--should we
allow the last Block to be 23 if they've scheduled all the rest?

Section 3.5(c)-- Please see the bracketed language at the end of this Section.

Section 4.7-- Should there a required minimum take of Energy?

Article 6-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form of PPA we used as a model did not
have any provisions on metering.  (See placeholder note in Article 6.)  Do
you want to add such a provision, ignore it or just include a placeholder for
now?

Section 9.1-- Is 30 days from invoice correct for the payment due date or
would you prefer a shorter period?

Article 15-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form had mediation as a required step
prior to arbitration.  Should we keep that?  Also, the form of arbitration is
"baseball" arbitration--i.e.,  the arbitrators have to chose one party's
position or the other's.  Is that what you want?

Section 16.2--  We used New York for governing law, on the premise that it
will be difficult to get VEPCO to agree to Texas law and we would not
recommend Virginia law for this contract.

Exhibit A-- There are a number of questions on the pricing exhibit--please
see the bracketed notes therein.

Please call and let us know how you would like to proceed on this draft.

 - VEPPPA.DOC


I talked to Louise and she said that Mark Taylor had the following idea.  If
the Chicago office signs an agreement that binds the Chicago office to every
"Midwest Hub" deal on EOL then we could avoid the PA and ETA.  I believe the
Chicago office is on the network so the stack manager should not be a
problem.  Louise said that she would have someone call Laura Luce.  Laura
manages the Chicago office and is the person that would authorize the above
agreement.

Thanks
Hunter