---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 02:36 PM
---------------------------

"Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com> on 06/30/2000 01:48:28 PM
To: John9375@aol.com, CHMARGAU@aol.com, BLawler875@aol.com,
m.montano@mail.utexas.edu, l.lawler@mail.utexas.edu, cll@prodigy.net,
srhea@acm.org, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: A quiz for Million Mom marchers to consider:

 >Subject: A quiz for Million Mom marchers to consider:
>
>
> >
> > 1. Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer and Barbara Boxer strongly denounce
> > private gun ownership. Their bodyguards; however, carry:
> > A.      Berettas
> > B.      Glocks
> > C.      Garbage can lids
> > D.      Slingshots
> > E.      Very heavy purses
> >
> > 2. You and your baby daughter are awakened in the middle of the night by
> > your estranged, abusive ex-husband. Although you have a restraining
> > order against him, he is drunk and beats down your front door with a
> > crowbar screaming, "If I can't have you, nobody can!" You  should:
> > A.     Call Barbara Boxer.
> > B.     Call 911, and tell them that they should arrive within 30
>seconds.
> > C.     Threaten legal action.
> > D.     Grab a ping-pong paddle.
> > E.      Reason with him (maybe he was an abused child).
> >
> > 3.   Since 1987, 34 states have enacted concealed carry laws. Violent
> > crime decreased in these states and the anticipated "Dodge City" mayhem
> > never materialized. Even critics were surprised. Concealed carry
> > succeeded because:
> > A.      Sunspot activity decreased after 1987.
> > B.      Trigger locks rendered guns inoperative and therefore safe.
> > C.      Sarah Brady scared the crooks away.
> > D.      A healing wave of pacifism swept over the hearts of criminals in
> > these 34 states.
> > E.      Janet Reno said that crime should stop.
> >
> > 4.  Schools, churches, subways, and restaurants have often been
> > assaulted, but rarely military bases, police stations, or shooting
> > clubs. The reason for this is because:
> > A.      The targets aren't sitting or kneeling.
> > B.      VA benefits are lost if you shoot a soldier.
> > C.      You can't enter an army base without bumper stickers.
> > D.      Schools don't threaten felons with detention hall.
> > E.      All of the above.
> >
> > 5.  Logic, reason, and common sense:
> > A.      Are irrelevant if they contradict your feelings.
> > B.      Should not apply to firearms.
> > C.      Defy opinion polls.
> > D.      Pale beside hysteria, fear, and political ambition.
> > E.      All of the above.
> >
> > 6.  Every dictator always disarms his victims, before beginning to
> > annihilate freedom loving people. The reason for this is because:
> > A.      Guns cause crime.
> > B.      Guns cause accidents
> > C.      Guns cause suicides
> > D.      Being defenseless is the only way that mothers can demonstrate
> > their love for their children
> > E.      All of the above
> >
> > "Blaming guns for what happened at Columbine is like blaming spoons for
> > Rosanne for being fat."
> >
> > 20th Century Patriot
> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


I will be out of the office  on Wednesday May 23rd and Friday, June 29th for
the ESC  Meetings off-site.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Here is today's edition:

This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be
disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior
written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are
&indicative8 prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market
conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation
of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit
arrangements and the approval of the respective management,s of our two
companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable
contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.
All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction
has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should
evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions
in making your decisions with respect thereto

Mark D. Smith
Manager
Enron North America
713-853-6601
Mark.Smith@enron.com


Start Date: 1/31/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002013114.txt


BRAWNER, SANDRA F,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
ROYED, JEFFREY


OK, so I don't know all of you and many others are long estranged.  And
there's nobody estranger than Brewster!  Hey-oohhh!  Yes!

Now that I have tickled your funny bone, I would like to tickle another
bone.  That bone is the one that is interested ushering our mutual friend,
Eric Ellwanger into blissful espousal.  We are throwing what the French
call "un party d' bachelor" for the bon bon homme.  (I do not speak French,
but I think that last bit rhymed.)

I really do not have a lot of information yet, I just wanted to make sure
that everyone keeps the date open.  The main event is Saturday,  May 12th
(a week before the actual wedding).  But, I think we oughta make a weekend,
and then a week of it, since at least Eric and Adam will be free for the
entire week between the bachelor party and the wedding.  It will take place
in Houston, but naturally will have global repercussions.  Out of towners
and drunkards, don't worry about a place to stay, I've got lots of room.

Oh, don't get too excited, but I might be able to get the KLF to perform.
They've got a hip new sound!

In the meantime, I would love to hear any ideas you might have for themes,
party favors, and the like.  Maybe something to do with the Cardinals,
Hawaiian shirts, or malted milk.   Also, if you have any pictures, please
send those along, as the hosts will possibly be developing a website to
chronicle this event.

Sincerely, Clay

7136568246 day
7135281980 night
7136622789 night after April 23rd
clay.f.guinn@exxonmobil.com

oh, and anything dirty, please email to clayguinn@yahoo.com instead of here


So I didn't violate yesterday.


Mike,

Per our conversation today, please note the assignment of transformers to the
PSCO / Fountain Valley Station project in El Paso county Colorado.

Unit / ABB Item # Guaranteed Delivery Date Site Designation

LNL 9517-1   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-2   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-3   12/01/00  El Paso County, Colorado

Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns.

Chris


Happy 1999 and welcome back.  Sorry to hear about your travel problems.  I
know how much fun a night in the airport can be.  I'd be happy to talk about
the US commodity laws at one of our group meetings.  I'm going to be in
London the last week of this month - maybe we can set something up for then?

Scott Sefton
12/27/98 11:06 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: London Trading Meetings

I've been thinking about what we could cover at our London trading meeting
every Tuesday and thought it would be a good idea if we could get you to give
the group a 15-20 minute overview of US commodities law. I think this would
be particularly helpful for our newest members, Robert Quick and Mark
Elliott. Please let me know what you think. Thanks!


- MVC-022S.JPG
 - MVC-018S.JPG
 - MVC-019S.JPG
 - MVC-020S.JPG
 - MVC-021S.JPG
 - MVC-017S.JPG


Start Date: 1/23/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012317.txt


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042111.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS


Market East needs to recognize $24,200 of Middle Market -East Originations
granted by the Pipe Options book.

Thanks,
Robin


Read the very bottom....

Compliments of your minion.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 02:37
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tom Swank                           06/19/2000 02:33 PM

To: TFBA@dynegy.com
cc: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Sullivan,
Tim" <SullivanT2@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: Re: FW: New Enron Deal

You mock what you don't understand.....The Dyner will do the same deal 3
years from now, but LOSE $666trillion, and call it revolutionary and
strategic to their business.

To: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Swank/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Pearl, Scott" <scott.pearl@csfb.com>, "Sullivan, Tim"
<SullivanT2@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: FW: New Enron Deal

what's going on over there.................
---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas F Bankert/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000
05:23
PM ---------------------------

Kim J Casey
06/16/2000 05:23 PM

To:   Thomas F Bankert/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Byron N Pollard/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim J Casey/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000 05:23 PM
---------------------------

John J Stauffacher
06/16/2000 03:19 PM

To:   Kim J Casey/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by John J Stauffacher/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000
03:19 PM ---------------------------

Peter Esposito
06/16/2000 02:22 PM

To:   Donna Atchison/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Jolly Hayden/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John J
      Stauffacher/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, M A Shute/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John
      Sousa/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joel M Staib/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Barry N
      Huddleston/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Dennis C Flaherty/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Marc R
      Chamberlin/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, David N Keane/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Matt K
      Schatzman/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Lynn A Lednicky/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Peter
      Esposito/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Jimmy F Thomas/NGCCorp@NGCCorp,
      lisa_krueger@illinova.com, james_fuhrmann@illinova.com, Glenn R
      Etienne/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Chris Moser/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gary
      Shannahan@Illinois_Power, Vann Prater/NGCCorp@NGCCorp,
      shawn_schukar@illinova.com, Dan Mortland@Illinois_Power, Bruce
      Hollibaugh@Illinois_Power, Jay Caspary@Illinois_Power,
      Kevin_Shipp@illinoispower.com, Mary Doyle/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joseph
      Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Ed A Ross/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Kathy
      Patton@Illinois_Power@NGCCorp, David Butts/IPC@Illinois_Power, Barry N
      Huddleston/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John J Stauffacher/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gregory
T
      Blue/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Glenn R Etienne/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, David N
      Keane/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gregory T Blue/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joel
      Newton/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Karen Cottrell/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joseph
      Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Kathy Patton/IPC@Illinois_Power, Steve
      Dalhoff/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Mark A Scheel/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, DLCR@dynegy.com,
      Dan King/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Sarah Tomalty/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Karen
      Cottrell/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Mary Doyle/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Christopher T
      Russo/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Esposito/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000 02:21
PM ---------------------------

vanhornepr@nmenergy.com on 06/16/2000 01:58:11 PM

To:   Peter Esposito/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:   picardimj@nmenergy.com

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

I guess Dynegy considers this retail??
---------------------- Forwarded by Philip R VanHorne/EM/NMEnergy on
06/16/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

Theresa A Flaim@NMPC
06/16/2000 01:56 PM

To:   Alan P Smithling/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Bart D Franey/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Joseph J
      Hipius/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Martin F Amati/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Wesley J
      Yeomans/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Scott D Leuthauser/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Clement E
      Nadeau/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Jerry J Ancona/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Robert E
      Shanning/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Joseph T Ash/ED/NMPC@NMPC, James J
      Cifaratta/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Angelo F Chambrone/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy,
      Annette M Durnack/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Richard J
      Cohen/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Matthew J Picardi/EXEC/NMEnergy@NMEnergy,
      Philip R VanHorne/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, J P
      Frazier/EXEC/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Albert J Budney/EXEC/NMPC@NMPC
cc:
Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Theresa A Flaim/FIN/NMPC on 06/16/2000
01:58
PM ---------------------------

"Scott, Bryan" <bscott@csw.com> on 06/16/2000 10:14:46 AM

To:   "'Deal, Ken'" <deal@netcom.ca>, Theresa A Flaim/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, "'Hoang,
      Khoa'" <khoa@ethree.com>, "'Keith, Dale M.'" <dkeith@tfs.net>, "'Neenan,
      Bernie'" <bneenan@bneenan.com>, "'Woo, CK'" <ck@ethree.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

A different view of Enron...

----------
From:  Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com
<mailto:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com>
[SMTP:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com]>
Sent:  Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:45 PM
To:  robert_v_mckim_jr@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:robert_v_mckim_jr@reliantenergy.com;>
suzie-williams@reliantenergy.com; <mailto:suzie-williams@reliantenergy.com;>
dee_r_chambless@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:dee_r_chambless@reliantenergy.com;>
rebecca-killough@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:rebecca-killough@reliantenergy.com;>  jeff.lamm@bchydro.bc.ca;
<mailto:jeff.lamm@bchydro.bc.ca;>  dcjml@hotmail.com;
<mailto:dcjml@hotmail.com;>  Danielle_B_Trettin@reliantenergy.com
<mailto:Danielle_B_Trettin@reliantenergy.com>
Subject:  New Enron Deal

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
-----------------------
Today Enron and Hades announced a definitive energy services agreement said
to be worth an estimated $666 Trillion.
In the deal, Enron will provide both gas and electric commodities to Hades'
facilities throughout and under North America.  John D. Rockefeller, former
CEO of energy monopolist Standard Oil, is now head of Hades' energy
management division.  Said Rockefeller, "Obviously Hell has significant
heating demands.  While eternal flames are a great idea in concept, they
require vast and reliable fuel resources.  Enron was the only supplier
willing to make a deal with my boss, and, as a former monopolist, I just
like the way they do business."
A spokesperson for Enron said the two cultures were able to work easily
together during negotiations.  According to the company, "The deal fits both
companies exceptionally well.  With Hades' ability to attract and retain new
customers, we see this as a fabulous growth opportunity for millennia to
come."  According to several energy industry insiders, Hades' high heating
demand with very little need for summer air conditioning make it a very
attractive energy portfolio addition.
Hades is a multinational corporation with millions of sites worldwide and
approximately 173 quintillion customers.  The entity boasts sustained high
growth rates over the last two thousand years.
Enron is one of the world's leading energy and communications companies.
The company owns approximately $37 billion in energy and communications
assets.  Enron ranks in the top quarter of Fortune's "Best 100 Companies to
Work For if You Can Keep A Job There and Don't Mind Working 80 Hours A
Week," and is among the most respected corporations in America, as ranked by
customers with respect-us-or-get-curtailed clauses in their energy supply
contracts.


Dave:
 I was talking with my brother-in-law who is Kinder/Morgan's VP of Corp
Development and they would be interested in talking with us about
contributing their 5,000 MW's of generation into a JV/Partnership to lead
into a public offering.  We are still under several different CA's with them,
due to our past conversation's regarding generation.
 With our previous discussions, Rich Kinder had suggested to Kevin Hannon if
Enron would be interested in buying the whole Orion  Project, but at that
time ENA was only interested in the first couple of projects, due to the
delivery of the turbines.
 In light of our past discussions and KMI's desire to exit the generation
business, this JV would give them the perfect "exit strategy".  Also, it
would give us a better growth strategy, with respects to our talks with other
parties.  I know that bringing in a potential third party would complicate
the deal structure, but I think that it would build a much better growth
story to Wall Street.
 If you think this would be a good idea, I can begin to set up a meeting as
soon as possible with Kinder/Morgan.  Thanks!
Ben


Sally,

I wanted to forward the latest update for the Book-Split Project.  Although
you may not find the details of the update to be that exciting, I want you to
know that much work and time are being put into this effort.  Paul and Gregor
are the two Desk Directors for Continental Power who report to Joe Gold.
It's good to hear some feedback from them.

As you know, Kristin has now shown some interest in the EBS job with Barry
now that Fallen is moving.  When Barry and I first spoke about the position
which I would fill, I told him the Fallen might want Kristin since he knows
her and has worked with her the last 2 years.  Although the job sounds
interesting (Barry's a good salesman), there is not room for both Kristin and
myself.  I'll keep you updated on my discussions with Barry.

Thanks for being a sounding board,
Todd

---------------------- Forwarded by D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 09:03
AM ---------------------------

Paul Mead
04/28/2000 02:20 AM
To: D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Book-Split Update 4/27/2000

Thanks for the update.  Great job to date.

Paul

	From:  D Todd Hall                           27/04/2000 18:38

To: Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil Tarling/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Book-Split Update 4/27/2000

Due to the announcement that the London office received pertaining to the May
Day problems which occurred last year, the Book-Split "Go Live" date will be
postponed until next Saturday, May 6.  Listed below are the updates since the
last memo:

BOOK-SPLIT

Completed
Position report which presents peak/off-peak volumes by month, by desk was
delivered to Paul and Gregor
Deal summaries which support the position report were also delivered
All volumetric variances between the Production and Test environments have
been identified - the material differences were related to 2 counterparties
which were not set up in Test and steps have been taken to resolve this issue
Discussed system changes relating to the Settlements invoicing system

Uncompleted
Test the PCS calc to ensure that it can report by desk
Separate DPRs and associated reports for the Pool and Bilateral portfolios
Testing of the Settlements invoicing system

TRANSMISSION

Talks have continued with the Houston IT team as to the Transmission deal
type testing that must be done.  The IT group moved floors yesterday and has
spent much of today recovering from the aftermath.  They are aware of the
sense of urgency and level of priority to give this issue and considerable
progress should be made during the next 2 weeks.

OTHER

Neil has been working with Miles in order to set up the necessary Cezch
border curves so that the CEZ deal may be properly booked in Enpower.  Once
this is complete, the Basis adjustment  (approx. 14M Eur) can be removed from
the DPR.  Also, the Financial Iberian positions have successfully been
intergrated into the current Continental Power DPR (leaving only the Spanish
physical deals being valued outside of Enpower).

Please come by if you have any questions,
Todd Hall


All,
I've recently learned that I'm not receiving a lot of emails  sent to this address, and AT&T can't seem to solve the problem.  I  apologize if you've sent something to me and I've not replied.  I'm going  to phase this out over the next couple of weeks.

Therefore, please update your address books to the  following:
 jmiles777@yahoo.com

Thanks,
Jason


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 10:18 AM
---------------------------

Andrew Kelemen
11/20/2000 07:48 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IMs

Please send copies of the E2 IMs to Joe Deffner and Anne Yaeger.  We may also
need to open dealbench for a few entities.  I'll let you know.


sure thing!

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 3:21 PM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Gibner, Stinson; Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject: I am Zhendong

Molly,

We would like to hire this person for the summer (standard offer).

Thanks.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Zhendong Xia <dengie@isye.gatech.edu> on 04/11/2001 09:14:01 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: I am Zhendong

Hi, Dr. Kaminski:

   I am Zhendong, the student of Dr. Deng. I think Dr. Deng has sent my
resume to you. I am very happy to have an opportunity to work with you
this summer.
   I am a student in both MS qcf and Ph.d EDA programs in Georgia Tech
now. I plan to find a job in industry instead of academic after my
graduation. So I intend to do internship during the process of prusuing my
degree to acquire some experience for my future career.
   I hope to start on 5/14/2001 and end on 8/17/2001.
   Thanks a lot.

Zhendong Xia
Georgia Institute of Technology
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering

Email:   dengie@isye.gatech.edu
         dengie@sina.com
Tel  :   (H)404-8975103
         (O)404-8944318


Hi, Jan.  I hope you are all doing well.  Maman has updated us on your
mother's condition.  I know it must be stressful, especially from long
distance.  Kali liked her birthday gifts.  Believe it or not, we didn't
already have the World Pup movie. We had rented it back in February and the
kids liked it.

I'm not sure if you got my last email before we left on vacation, but I was
wondering what your travel schedule was in June.  When will you be arriving,
when will you be returning (Kali has warmed up to the idea of travelling
without us on the plane), etc.  The earliest we could leave for Brazil would
be the evening of Friday, July 6.  We would probably need to return to
Houston by July 14.  Let me know how that sounds.  Also, if we need to
reschedule for another time until you get things straight for your mother,
let me know.  That's certainly more important.

Talk to you soon.....

Susan


This is to confirm that the meeting to discuss Double Trigger has been
scheduled for Wednesday, May 30th, at 4:00 p.m., in EB 3328.  Per and David
may call into 713-853-1450 to join the meeting via phone.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you.

Cathy P.
X-36898


THE STAFF MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELED FOR TODAY...

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Coach Jim Haslett had put together the perfect
New Orleans Saints team.
The only thing he was missing was a good quarterback.

He had scouted all the colleges, and even the high schools,
but he couldn't find a ringer quarterback
who could ensure a Super Bowl win.

Then one night, while watching CNN,
he saw a war-zone scene in Bosnia.
In one corner of the screen,
he spotted a young Bosnian soldier with a truly
incredible arm.
He threw a hand grenade straight
into a 15th-story window 200 yards away
--ka-boom!

"I've got to get this guy!"  Haslett said to himself.
"He has the perfect arm!"
So, he brings the kid to the New Orleans
and teaches him the great game of football,
and the Saints go on to win the Super Bowl
for the first time in history.

The young Bosnian is "canonized"
as the Great Hero of football,
and when Haslett asks him what he wants,
all the young man wants to do
is to call his mother.
"Mom," he says into the phone,
"I just won the Super Bowl."
"I don't want to talk to you," the old woman says.
"You deserted us.  You are not my son."
"I don't think you understand, Mother!" the young man pleads.
"I just won the greatest sporting event in the world.
I'm here among thousands of my adoring fans."
"No, let me tell you," the mother retorts.
"At this very moment, there are gunshots all around us.
The neighborhood is a pile of rubble.
Your two brothers were beaten within an inch of their lives yesterday,
and today your sister was kidnapped in broad daylight."
The old lady pauses, and then tearfully says "
 ...I'll never forgive you for making us move to
New Orleans."


I am sending hard copies.  I can't find the electronic version.

	"Sean Bunk" <BUNKS@andrews-kurth.com>
	08/09/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wind River Conversion

Gerald,

Could you please send or email me copies of:
  (i) the Guaranty, dated as of 12/17/98 by Enron Corp. in favor of Lost
Creek, and
  (ii) the Guaranty, dated as of 12/17/98 by BR in favor of Lost Creek
so that I can prepare the Guaranty Terminations to be executed in connection
with the conversion.  Thanks.

Please call me at (713) 220-4427 if you have any questions.

Sean


please coordinate with Mark Wawro at Susman re when we will be traveling to
this hearing
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

skusin@susmangodfrey.com on 03/21/2000 10:30:04 AM
To: mwawro@susmangodfrey.com
cc: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
Subject: TI hearing date and briefing schedule

I have agreed with opposing counsel that the temporary injunction
hearing will be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 18, 2000 in Chicago.  We have
tentatively agreed on the following briefing schedule:

We will file our opposition brief by April 7, 2000.

Plaintiff's will file any reply brief by April 13, 2000.

Let me know if you have any questions.


Hi Mark and Mark,

Over the past few weeks we have generated a list of which status counters are
incremented during which fault/status conditions. Kim Nguyen tested all the
fault/status conditions that she could using the EW1.5 software simulator
(about 50% of them). Her list also includes the "theoretical" counter that is
supposed to increment according to the specifications that we have received
from the Scada department in Rheine.

I took that list and indexed it by counter so it show all the faults that
actually (according to our simulation) increment a given counter. I also
included the faults that we could not test and the counters they
theoretically increment.

If you have time could you please check to see that the given faults are
incrementing the correct counters using the proper definitions of
availability. Specifically, there are several highlighted items in the second
document that may not be correct. We are trying to get a list back to the
Scada group in Rheine to correct any problems with our counters and you input
would be extremely valuable.

Thanks,

Garth


Did you not hear me.  I said I was talking athletics.  Do you want me to
break out academics with you?  I will be more than happy to discuss Auburn.
Top 15 schools for your money, US News & World Report.   Behind the service
academies, more astronauts than any other university.  Top ten among
universities in terms of fortune 500 CEO's, Fortune Magazine.

The point, don't try and act like LSU is the best school in the land.  Just
because Enron doesn't recruit at some schools, doesn't mean they are inferior
academically.  I would much rather have a degree from Tulane than LSU or
Auburn, in terms of academic stature.  You should know that recruiting at
Enron has and will always be political.  You have to have someone from that
school in upper managment request trips be made.  I can promise you in the
next 2-3 years they will be recruiting at Auburn.  I and anothe alum have
already discussed it with HR.
PL


Ben and I have been discussing the possibility of getting more dedicated
support from Houston on our project.  We are wondering what the possibility
is of having either Amitava or Vasant come over for 8 - 12 weeks to help get
things jumpstarted on the the credit scoring and modeling front as well as
provide some guidance on the CLO part of the business and potentially hiring
an additional  full time resource.  If there is any possibility, it would be
hugely valuable given the long lead times to get someone from the City in and
integrated in addition to the significant cost.

Let me know your thoughts

bs


Vince,

After checking into this issue I have found that the type of information
requested is proprietary and not available for release.  I will try to
contact them and see if there is something else we can help them with but as
far as the data is concerned I don't believe we can help them with that
request.  I am sorry I couldn't be of more help.  Thank you.

Shalesh Ganjoo

Vince J Kaminski
11/21/2000 09:15 AM
To: Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Information

Shalesh,

Please, look into it. Can we give them this information?
I see a remote possibility of a gain for Enron: it's in our interest to
support
the growth of this market and part of the process is development of the
infrastructure for this market and maintaining public interest.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
09:18 AM ---------------------------

"yann d'Halluin" <ydhallui@elora.math.uwaterloo.ca> on 11/16/2000 01:18:39 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Information

Dear Sir:

 The Scientific computation group at the University of
 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, has recently started to be very
 interested in the recent developments of the bandwidth
 market. We find that the specifics of the bandwidth market
 offer challenges from the modelling point
 of view.

 However, we have encountered difficulties when looking for
 data, and we were wondering if you could help us. Specifically
 we would like to know for a given city pair for the different
 existing type of lines ( e.g. OC3, OC12, OC48 .... )

1. What has been the spot lease prices (e.g. $/line-type/mile) for
        the past 12 months?

2. What is the price of the dark fiber for a given type of line?

3. What is the maintenance cost $/month ?
           (for the same lines, e.g. OC3, OC12, OC48, ...)

4. What is the upgrading cost for the different lines?
           (e.g. how much does it cost to upgrade)
                OC3  --> OC12
                OC3  --> OC48
                OC12 --> OC48

5. How long does it take to upgrade a line from a certain
        capacity to another (e.g. 1 month, 2 month, ...) ?

 We realize that some of these questions may ask for confidential
data, in that case we would really appreciate if an order of magnitude
was provided. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Yann d'Halluin

P.S: Here is a link to our web page:
         http://www.scicom.uwaterloo.ca

--
************************************************************************
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
 are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
 is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
 the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.
************************************************************************


Changes in BOLD for ease of reference.


Attached is the Enron Americas GasTrading violation memos for  Maturity Gap
Risk and VaR for June 18, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron
Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it
and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


We do not have the answer for you at this time.  It must be researched.  Sara

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Willie Harrell                           02/24/2000 11:41 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: C/P request - use of e-mail

Please forward a legal opinion regarding the below attached request by Cabot
Oil and Gas Corporation. Your opinion via e-mail is acceptable.  Thanks,
Willie  (ext. 3-9226)

---------------------- Forwarded by Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
11:19 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           02/24/2000 10:19 AM

To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: C/P request - use of e-mail

All,

Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation has requested that all Derivative Confirmations
be handled via e-mail rather than fax.  Is this ok with Legal?  I have faxed
the letter to x3490 to Susan Bailey's attention.

Thanks,
Joe


Start Date: 3/12/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031222.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  49.81 / Final:  49.78)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/12/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Howdy again,

You might be interested in knowing that a version of the previous was
published in the English language Turkish Daily News here on February 9th.
(I'm still waiting to hear back from some folks in the States.)  Afraid that
it might appear a bit negative about the Turks, I shortened it, taking out
for example my speculation about how Turkish soldiers might treat folks who
outflanked the fence as well as some of my thoughts about why all the
windows had been knocked out.  (I did leave in my thought about
"vindictiveness" being the justification.)   It still got edited a bit, for
example my use of the word "invasion" was changed to "Peace Operation",
which is the somewhat euphemistic term it is known by here (which doesn't
not mean I am saying the Turks weren't justified in invading the place).

I'd love to hear your thoughts about it, or any other news that you all
might have.

Hope all goes well.

Mark

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Before I finalize this, I'd like to get your reaction to what I have
drafted.  I still need to get Ken Culotta's and John Cogan's input.

Thanks

 <<302P01!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 302P01!.DOC


Below are contacts if you need help over the weekend with new docs, employee questions, etc.
Amy Fitzpatrick   Cell:  713-859-6266
Jeanie Sloan   Cell:  713-553-7049

I need to know by noon on Sunday who is in and who is not.   For people not committing, try to get there contracts back so we can re-allocate $'s as necessary.   All contracts signed by Sunday at noon will get a $2500 check from me personally.   I encourage all of you to contribute to the fund to entice early signing.  If you need new docs printed, please contact Amy or Jeanie at above #'s or call me.

Harry - You and your guys situation is different, therefore, ignore the Sunday issue.   However, please contact Amy and/or Jeanie to generate contracts for Steve and Rob (use the $'s we talked about).

List of key employees who have not signed:

Gupta
Suarez
Carson
Broderick
Misra
Wang
Stalford
Ballato
Imai

The ERCOT desk is almost done (1 more to go) - kudos to Doug

UBS CONTACTS

IN HOUSTON WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
        Position        Home    Work    Cell    Other
Anderson, Mimi  Data Administration     203-353-9121    203-719-6448
Brown, Anthony  All Issues      212-253-6313    212-821-2346    646-244-6311
Galasso, Jill   Data Administration     203-277-2067    203-719-3614
Lee, Jenai      Data Manager    718-788-8468    212-821-6073

KEY CONTACTS WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
        Position        Home    Work    Cell    Other
Bliss, Melissa  Front Office    203-655-4678    203-719-6358    203-253-4339
Eastwick, Jacqueline    Front Office    203-966-9294    203-719-4575
Martin, Audrey  Front Office    212-423-5764    203-719-4699    917-468-0237    860-824-7707
Luecke, Susan   Operations      203-602-3332    203-719-6916    914-830-4528
Ciliberto, David        IT      212-253-5477    212-713-3276    917-319-5360
Reichman, Peter FCD/Legal       914-939-4161    203-719-0276    917-417-8914
Knight, Linda   CRM/HR/Market Risk      203-438-5397    203-719-4681    917-848-7251

KEY SPECIALIST CONTACTS WEEKEND OF JANUARY 19/20
        Position        Home    Work    Cell    Other
Raman, Kumar    Immigration             212-891-7515
Digiacomo, Larry        Reloction/Int'l Assignees       203-248-4560    203-719-4686    203-696-8646
Hart, Tracy     Compensation Policies   203-358-9687    203-719-4688
Raimondi, Vince Benefits        203-563-0535    203-719-0656    203-563-0535

HOUSTONIAN HOTEL        713-680-2626
War Room - Magnolia Room


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
10:11 AM ---------------------------

"John H Herbert" <jhh1@email.msn.com> on 02/15/2001 11:04:45 PM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: A present

Best regards,

JHHerbert

 - ts2142001.pdf


What was the volume of Jeffy gas going to Mikey?  And what day did that
start?


Please pencil in the following interview schedules;  I will confirm.

 Wednesday, 4/19/ 00 9:30 a.m. Mark Taylor
    EB38c2  10:00 a.m. Carol St. Clair
    10:30 a.m. Sara Shackleton
    11:00 a.m. Susan B., Tana, Susan F.

 Thursday, 4/20/00 9:30 a.m. Mark Taylor
    EB38c2  10:00 a.m. Carol St. Clair
    10:30 a.m. Sara Shackleton
    11:00 a.m. Susan B., Tana, Susan F.

Note:  METaylor, Susan B., Tana I will put on your calendars.


FYI

Maybe we can go into Columbus Saturday evening and stay in the country with
the dogs.

How did you sleep last night?  Hope your have a better day!

-----Original Message-----
From: John Menconi [mailto:jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:08 AM
To: 'barbarb menconi'
Subject: RE: Test

Rob and I had fun in CS.  Yes, the Ags need to get better.  This weekend
should be a huge test.

Mo and I would like to go to the Braden reunion but I seem to have misplaced
my invite.  Can you sign us up?  I'm not sure what are plan will be (I think
Mo has a running event on Saturday morning of the 20th) but we'll talk next
week.

-----Original Message-----
From: barbarb menconi [mailto:bmenconi@flash.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:21 AM
To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
Subject: Re: Test

Hi John, I'm glad the ags won but did they look good?  We need to get
better, yes!!!  Are you and Mo planning on coming to the Braden reunion on
Sunday 21st?  Granddad is treating but we're trying to determine how many.
Let me know.  Have a great week.  We will stay home this weekend in our own
beds:)  Love, Mom
-----Original Message-----
From: John Menconi <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
To: Mom (E-mail) <bmenconi@flash.net>
Date: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: Test

>Hey guys, I got your phone message.  There hasn't been any change to my
>e-mail so no telling what happened.  How is everything going?
>
>For us, work is work and in between is eat and sleep.  At least that's what
>it feels like sometimes.  I'm off to College Station this weekend with Rob
>to watch the Aggs play.  Talk to you soon.
>


Kate,

Please approve and autoschedule annuity # 580471. It's for 10/31/2000.

Les


Trade counts, by 3:30 pm, since October 1:

TRADE DATE	TRADE CNT
11/7/2001	6034
11/6/2001	6223
11/5/2001	6450
11/4/2001	36
11/3/2001	58
11/2/2001	5841
11/1/2001	6539
10/31/2001	7093
10/30/2001	5713
10/29/2001	7060
10/28/2001	7
10/27/2001	11
10/26/2001	6776
10/25/2001	8359
10/24/2001	7906
10/23/2001	8500
10/22/2001	7883
10/21/2001	34
10/20/2001	4
10/19/2001	7978
10/18/2001	7610
10/17/2001	7405
10/16/2001	7086
10/15/2001	5386
10/14/2001	19
10/13/2001	16
10/12/2001	6095
10/11/2001	5922
10/10/2001	6200
10/9/2001	5252
10/8/2001	5092
10/7/2001	52
10/6/2001	17
10/5/2001	5846
10/4/2001	6455
10/3/2001	5930
10/2/2001	5354
10/1/2001	5207

Counterparty data is in the enclosed spreadsheet.


What do I need to do?  Should I end the exitsting contracts effective
4/30/00 and create new ones effective 5/1/00?  Does Marlene need to create a
new type of FT rate service to make these contracts appear different ( maybe
that has already been done)?

Marlene Hilliard
05/03/2000 05:01 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I was not aware ot the Sonat Style.  In that case, an IT request is not
necessary.

Marlene Hilliard
---------------------- Forwarded by Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------

Richard Pinion
05/03/2000 04:48 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

I have been speaking with Sylvia Campos on this.  Originally they wanted to
do this via IT request which I thought would cause some problems. Since then
they changed their minds and decided to so it Sonat style and merely create a
different service type (so as not to change historically).  To my
recollection that is the way that they were going and supposedly it was
cleared with Connie Sutton.  So this reversal does somewhat surprise me.

RP

Chris Germany
05/03/2000 02:36 PM
To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard, according to Marlene, she needs to put in an IT request to change
the National Fuel contracts from non-pathed to pathed.  Does this sound
correct to you?

Please let me know.
chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:28
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Beverly Beaty                           05/03/2000 02:14 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Per our conversation....

Bev
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:14
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Donna Greif                           04/21/2000 12:44 PM

To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

Richard,

I trust you're on top of this.....let me know if you'd like my help!

Thanks!

dg

From: Diane E Niestrath on 04/19/2000 06:23 PM
To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type

DG & RP,

National Fuel says they are 100% using the GISB pathed model type.  Our Unify
noms are non-pathed.

1) Can you look at the National Fuel invoice and verify that the accounting
area will still work effortlessly if we change Unify to pathed.
2) If we elect to change Unify's model type to pathed, let's do it just like
we did Southern Natural.  And, I would like this done for May 1 noms in
production and have the Scheduler (Beverly?) path in this new model type
manner.  We are suppose to be getting scheduled quantities in production
starting tomorrow, unless ECOM prevents it, so you'll be able to see what the
pipe expects in the pathed model type.
3) If we elect to NOT change Unify's model type to pathed, I guess we can't
ever edi this pipe unless I can figure out some clever way to join up the
noms.

Beverly, Do you think it would be a problem to start entering the upstream
k's and downstream k's when you path in Unify.  The pipe told me this is
mandatory data unless the nom is involved in the Appalachian area.  If it is
a problem, don't do, I don't want to slow you down since you have to enter
the data twice today.  If and when we do edi, we'll need the up/down k's
entered at that time.

Thanks, Diane
x3-9931

==============================================================================
=======================
Email excerpt between Diane (in magenta) and Chris Zachary in IT Dptmt at
National Fuel Gas Supply Corp (in blue) ===>

>> 3) Please confirm that your model type is always "P" pathed from noms all
the
>> way down to invoices.

    Our model type is always "P" for pathed.


Sheri,

I need to know the nature of the discussions we will be having with this
company so I know how to word the decription in the agreement.  Also, usually
I email the agreements directly to the counterparty, so unless he will be
delivering this in another manner, I will need an email address.

	Sheri L Cromwell/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/02/2001 04:34 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Pavetto/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Request for NDA

Tana,

John Pavetto asked if you could prepare a standard NDA for the following
company:

Ajilon, L.L.C.
16225 Park Ten Place
Suite 620
Houston, TX  77084
Attn.:  Ken Keefer

Ken Keefer is not sure who will sign on behalf of Ajilon.  David Berberian
(Managing Director) will sign for Net Works.

John has a meeting with them the week of May 14.  Please let me know if you
need any additional info.

Thanks!
Sheri


Are you putting words in my mouth Tim.

The East is absolutely adamant about having a liquid real-time energy markets
with a "real supply curve" and a "real demand curve" such that hourly
clearing prices reflect the true economic value of the commodity.   With
respect to the number of hourly price signals within an RTO that is
necessary, that is subject to much debate.   Although I prefer a zonal model
for simplicity reasons, the reality is that congestion is more prevalent in
the East in most of the markets and in order to get a functioning real time
energy market, we may have settle for a limited LMP, in which nodal pricing
is necessary for managing the congestion, but proxy buses are created in
zones (3-5 per RTO) for purposes of real-time energy markets.

Our views, I believe, are still very much aligned, however, I need to make
some progress on the creation of real time energy markets.   The zonal
markets implemented in NEPOOL and contemplated for ERCOT result in a
mis-priced commodity with no "real" price signal sent to the market.   Out of
merit generation is and will continue to be dispatched because the congestion
is managed through energy uplift payments (congestion price signal is not
sent to the market).   This results in a very inefficient commodity market
where the consumer gets screwed and market makers can't price the commodity
or transportation on a forward basis.

I hope this clarifies any misunderstanding.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 12/15/99 05:20 PM
---------------------------

GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 10:30:11 AM

[ &nbsp]Message[ &nbsp]-[ &nbsp]From:[&
nbsp]GISB1@aol.com on 12/15/99 04:30 PM GMT

To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Jrtemplton@aol.com, william_p_boswell@corp.cng.com

Subject:	DOE meeting

Stan, Shelley and Jeff:

    Attached is a draft of the announcement, agenda and two form letters.
January 26 is the date and we hope to have this announcement this week,
barring any problems that arise at the last minute.  Let me know if you have
any changes you would like made.  Jim and Bill have reviewed the announcement
and the agenda.

     We are putting together the list of associations and special invitees,
in addition, of course, to all GISB members.  So far the list includes the
AGA, APGA, APPA, EPRI, EPSI, NERC, NARUC Gas and Electric Committees, CUBR,
EEI, IPPA, NGSA, UIG, Governors' Association, Energy Subcommittee, NASUCA.
If you can think of any more let me know.

    On corporations -- we are targeting big utilities that are not GISB
members -- Southern, the Electric side of Cinergy, NYSEG, etc.  If you can
think of any others there, also let me know.

        Best Regards, Rae

 - meeting.PDF


Kevin, I am not sure that you will get credit from the buyer for the
increased MW's given well known industry issues with the 501F technology.
Further, any buyer will pay based upon 90 degree output which is the same in
any case (ie) increased output only helps when ambient temperatures are lower
than 90 degrees at site.  Likely the buyer will run any spread option value
or multiple value based on 90 degree output.

I may be wrong but it is also my recollection that this is a warranty issue
rather than a true output issue (ie) we could increase the MW's at any time
but we would likely run into warranty issues with Westinghouse.  Given that
the warranty expires in less than twelve months, what value do we really
get.  Would it not be better to get the maximum amount of hard dollars out of
Westinghouse rather than an increase in output which will only be guaranteed
for a limited amount of time and likely will not be paid for by a buyer.

The thought process on the EECC side is for them to find overhead and cost
savings to fund their fee ($9.0M) rather than further increase to the capital
cost of the facilities.  As well, given current accounting language, any fee
we pay will have to be expensed to current earnings rather than capitalized
so I would like to find ways for this to be self financing.

My knowledge on this one is rather cursory - can you guys work this out and
adjust tactics with EECC as necessary.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           09/25/2000 09:12 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Westinghouse LD's for Gleason/Wheatland

Given the probable sale of these 2 facilities, I would like clarification on
the LD proceeds from Westinghouse.  See questions/points below.

1)  Izzo has claimed that you (Delainey) has agreed to pay EE&CC for
construction services in the form of Westinghouse LD payments.  Is this
correct?
2)  I am concerned that EE&CC will settle for cash payment from Westihnghouse
(Heat Rate & Schedule penalties) rather than increased output.
3)  Given a sale at $450/kW, increased output is worth $5 million vs. the
$1-2 million we would collect for schedule and Heat Rate LD's.
4)  My recommendation is to trade the HR and schedule shortfall for increased
output at Gleason to maximize total Enron profitability.

From ENA's perspective we should collect the schedule penalty at Wheatland
only and insist on the 12 MW additional output at Gleason.  This combination
provides the best value to Enron.

If Izzo's form of payment for the construction jobs is Westinghouse LD's,
then he will be motivated to recieve cash payment.  Please provide me the
necessary feedback to ensure that we do the right thing for Enron.

Thanks Dave.


I created a buy/sell with Hopewell that we are going to kill after the month
is over.  Deals 549136 and 549152 will be killed next week.  These tickets
are just estimating the loss on oil replacement.


I purchased the 10,000 dth gas from Reliant for the month.  The $70,000.00 wire needs to be revised to $989,700.00.

I left a revised cash request on Doug's desk.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:00 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Hamic, Priscilla; Dhont, Margaret; Sewell, Doug
Cc:	Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay; 'Mark Ellenberg (E-mail)'; Dinari, Sabra L.
Subject:	RE: Prepays to Reliant and Dominion

I want to cancel the wire to Dominion Oklahoma that was set to go out today and I'm going to revise the $70,000.00 wire to Reliant.

The other wires to Reliant, the $701,760.00 and the $40,000.00, are good to go.

I will have this completed before lunch but I estimate that the $70,000.00 wire to Reliant will be revised to approximatly $995,000.00.
This net impact is an increase in cash outflows of $280,000.00 (cancel the $646,860 and increase the $70,0000to $995,000).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:19 PM
To:	Hamic, Priscilla; Dhont, Margaret; Sewell, Doug
Cc:	Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; McMichael Jr., Ed; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay; Mark Ellenberg (E-mail)
Subject:	Prepays to Reliant and Dominion

I am requesting the following prepays to Reliant and Dominion for tomorrow.  All of these request are signed and on Doug's desk.

Prepay to Reliant for April Trunkline deal (sitara #1202698)   6,800 dth x 30 days x $3.44 per dth = $701,760.00

Prepay to Reliant for swing supply on Florida and Trunkline  $40,000.00

Prepay to Reliant for intraday backup supply in case Dominion does not perform under the contract
		10,000 dth x 2 days x $3.50 per dth = $70,000.00

Prepay to Dominion Oklahoma for April baseload activity 10,000 dth x 30 days x $2.1562 per dth = $646,860.00

 << File: Reliant Prepay (2.8.02).doc >>  << File: Reliant 2 Prepay (2.8.02).doc >>  << File: MCV_Reliant Cash Request.doc >>  << File: Dominion Prepay (1.29.02 for $603,736)_update.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mark Ellenberg" <Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:58 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric
Subject:	RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on Florida

i agree with kay's suggested approach.

if we are purchasing gas from another source at a higher price, i would put
dominion on notice that we are doing that and stating we will hold them
responsible.

Mark C. Ellenberg
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
1201 F Street, NW
Washington, DC  20004
202.862.2234

                    "Mann, Kay"
                    <Kay.Mann@ENR        To:     "Germany, Chris"
                    ON.com>              <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com>, "Boyt, Eric"
                    Office:              <Eric.Boyt@ENRON.com>, "Mark Ellenberg (E-mail)"
                                         <Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com>
                    03/27/02             cc:     "McMichael Jr., Ed"
                    01:47 PM             <Ed.McMichael@ENRON.com>
                                         Subject:     RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee
                                         deal on Florida

I've left a message for Dominion's counsel, telling him that we disagree
with their position that they can terminate the gas contract, and asking
him to educate us as to why they don't think that action is stayed.

We can follow up with a letter suggesting that we believe their termination
is wrongful, unless Mark disagrees.

Second issue is whether we should attempt to pay for the gas anyway, since
they have to deliver gas paid for prior to termination.

Kay

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Germany, Chris
> Sent:         Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:14 AM
> To:           Germany, Chris; Boyt, Eric; Mann, Kay; Mark Ellenberg
(E-mail)
> Cc:           Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil; McMichael Jr.,
Ed; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
> Subject:           RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on Florida
>
>
> The Tallahassee deal still has value so we want the Dominion deal to stay
in place.  I'm concerned about the 1st because all the money needs to be
wired tomorrow.  At this point, I believe Dominion should supply the gas
for April at the contract price regardless.
>
> Let me know where we stand with Dominion by 1:30 PM today.
>
> Thanks
>           -----Original Message-----
>          From:          Germany, Chris
>          Sent:          Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:04 AM
>          To:       Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric; Mann,
Kay
>          Cc:       Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil
>          Subject:       RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on
Florida
>
>          The contract number assigned to this deal in Sitara is 96003121.
>          The contract number in Sitara for the Tallahassee deal is
96003663.
>
>                     -----Original Message-----
>                    From:          Germany, Chris
>                    Sent:          Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:01 AM
>                    To:       McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric; Mann, Kay
>                    Cc:       Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil
>                    Subject:       Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on
Florida
>
>                    Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc
(successor to Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp) is supplying ENA 10,000 dth
per day at a Florida Zone 1.  This supply is matched up with ENA's sale to
The City of Tallahassee.  I believe both deals go through March 2013.  I
prepay Dominion for the supply each month.
>
>                    This morning, I had a voicemail from my contact at
Dominion, David Walker (405-749-5240).  His voicemail stated that Dominion
was terminating their contract with ENA and Dominion would not be supplying
any gas effective April 1, 2002.  Paul Vrana (713-752-4514) with Jackson
Walker is representing Dominion, he prepared the termination letter.
>
>                    Just spoke with Paul (10:55 AM) - he has not spoken
with anyone representing Enron but he has worked with Harlam Murphy?? in
the past.  He will fax a letter to me.
>
>                    Kay, I will leave a copy of the letter in your chair.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


I appreciate your message.  Just let the group know if you're unable to
attend.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	03/01/2001 11:07 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Legal/Credit meeting

Sara, Keegan and I are aware of the time for the credit meetings; however, I
had to complete an urgent task in order to leave early since I was not
feeling well.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3880D
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	02/28/2001 08:40 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal/Credit meeting

Cheryl:  Please be sure to schedule our regular meeting with credit.  We
missed you yesterday.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Looks ok

Peggy Mahoney@EES
08/25/2000 01:24 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Press release

New version.  I think all suggested changes were made.
Let me know soon!!
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/25/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Johnson
08/25/2000 12:39 PM
To: Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Press release

Peggy:

Attached is the revised release.  On Gene's direction, I did not omit the
"economies of scale" phrase, but I did make changes which attribute it to
technology (AOL) and processing (IBM).

Let me know what everyone thinks.

Thanks,
Kathy


PIPELINE   CONTACT    PHONE  FAX   PAGER

BLACK MARLIN   Blair Lichentwalter  713 853-7367  713 646-3201  (H)
281                370-1866
    Debbie Thompson   713 853-3144  713 646-3201
(Noms Due today for 23rd through 27th)

CHANNEL   Jim Tobacco   713 420-2159
    Gas Control   1 505 599-2333
(Open Thursday.  Noms will be due through Monday)

CENTANA   William Spekels  713 627-6290     713 762-3450
    Donna Spencer   713 627-6255
    Gas Control   1 888 204-1718
(Noms due today for 23rd through 27th)

DUKE ENERGY  Annette Anderson  713 260-8603     713 949-3026
 (On Call)  Bob Moseman   713-260-8698 (Thursday)

Open Tomorrow - Noms will be due thru the 27th)

LONESTAR    Gary Gafford   214 670-2674  214 875-3810
    Gas Control   214 875-2455 or 2456

(Noms due today, 23rd thru 27th)

Northern Natural  Ben Markey   853-7581  Cell  713 446-9404 800 931-0398
  (On Call) Charlie Mosey   853-1520
    Gas Control    853-
(Open Thursday - Noms due thru 27th.)

EAST TRANS - EAST TEXAS

TEJAS    Gas Control   713 767-5366
    Paula Svehla   713 230-3569
    Mickey Chapman  713 230-3546
(Open Thursday - Noms due thru 27th)

MIDCON (Y2K)  Ken Nachlinger   713 369-9284  713 369-9375  888 733-5954
  (On Call) Steven          888 790-0255
  (Y2K)  Don          888 733-4602
    Gas Control   713 369-9200

(Noms due today, 23rd thru 27th)

MOSS BLUFF   NO CURRENT BUSINESS


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
03:34 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Jordan @ ENRON                           07/28/2000 06:36 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Who Wants to Help Millions Participants

Good Afternoon,

Attached please find the results for your operating company from the "Who
Wants to Help Millions" contest for United Way.  The spreadsheet contains
only those who answered them correctly and those who missed 1 to 5 out of a
possible 15 questions.

We would like to have 5 employees from every business unit for a
pre-qualifying round to be held before the all employee meeting on August
9th.  On the spreadsheet that contains the names of those participates who
answered the questions, please choose the 5 employees you would like to
represent your business unit.  We feel that those individuals who either
answered them all correct or only missed one should be automatically
selected.  How you determine your remaining representatives will be at your
discretion.

We must receive your responses by Wednesday, August 2nd.

Should you have any questions please feel free to contact either Kathy
Mayfield (3-3264), John Walt (3-5379) or myself (3-7554).

Thank you for your support for the 2000 United Way Campaign.


Ours is:

3805 W. Alabama # 3308
Houston, TX 77027

My parents is:

10802 Jaycreek
Houston, Tx 77070

Glad I got to see you this weekend!

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laura Black <lblack@VALIDMGT.COM>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Laura+20Black+20+3Clblack+40VALIDMGT+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 2:06 PM
To:	'sscott5@enron.com'
Subject:	address

hey sus-
when you get a chance could you send me your address and your parents?  i
know i have yours and lisa's somewhere, but i better start a new list.
thanks!!

Laura Jahnke
Corporate Recruiter
Smith & Associates
T 713.430.3076
F 713.430.3071
www.smithweb.com


As you are aware, some lawyers and legal specialists were recently moved into
different groups within our department.  Time and expenses should continue to
be charged through year end to the Cost Centers or WBS Elements which were
already in place.  This is for budget purposes.

This means timekeepers need to continue to enter time as usual --- for the
same people and groups you have been entering time for until we can charge
time and expenses to the new Cost Centers at the beginning of 2001.

In summary, your Cost Center will not change until January 2001.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


HELLO! THIS IS AMERICA!
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma School officials remove "God Bless America" signs from schools in fear that someone might be offended.
Channel 12 News in Long Island, New York, orders flags removed from the newsroom and red, white, and blue ribbons removed from the lapels of reporters.
Why?
Management did not want to appear biased and felt that our nations flag might give the appearance that "they lean one way or another."
Berkeley, California bans U.S. Flags from being displayed on city fire trucks because they didn't want to offend anyone in the community.
In an "act of tolerance" the head of the public library at Florida Gulf Coast University ordered all "Proud to be an American" signs removed so as to not offend international students.
I, for one, am quite disturbed by these actions of so-called American citizens; and I am tired of this nation worrying about whether or not we are offending some individual or their culture.
Since the terrorist attacks on September 11, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled in New York and Washington D.C. when the "politically correct" crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to America.
In fact, our country's population is almost entirely comprised of descendants of immigrants; however, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some native Americans, need to understand.
First of all, it is not our responsibility to continually try not to offend you in any way. This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity.
As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language, and our own lifestyle.
This culture, called the "American Way" has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
Our forefathers fought, bled, and died at places such as Bunker Hill, Antietam, San Juan, Iwo Jima, Normandy, Korea, Vietnam,
We speak English, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society -- learn our language!
"In God We Trust" is our national motto.
This is not some off-the-wall, Christian, Right Wing, political slogan; it is our national motto.
It is engraved in stone in the House of Representatives in our Capitol and it is printed on our currency.
We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation; and this is clearly documented throughout our history.
If it is appropriate for our motto to be inscribed in the halls of our highest level of Government, then it is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools.
God is in our pledge, our National Anthem, nearly every patriotic song, and in our founding documents. We honor His birth, death, and resurrection as holidays, and we turn to Him in prayer in times of crisis.
If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture and we are proud to have Him.
We are proud of our heritage and those who have so honorably defended our freedoms. We celebrate Independence Day, Memorial Day, Veterans Day, and Flag Day.
We have parades, picnics, and barbecues where we proudly wave our flag.
As an American, I have the right to wave my flag, sing my national anthem, quote my national motto, and cite my pledge whenever and wherever I choose.
If the Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.
The American culture is our way of life, our heritage, and we are proud of it. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from, if it was so superior, go home.
We are Americans, like it or not, this is our country, our land, and our lifestyle.
Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion about our government, culture, or society, and we will allow you every opportunity to do so.
But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great American freedom, the right to leave.
If you agree, pass this onto other Americans!!
It is time to take a stand!!
MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA LAND THAT WE LOVE!!!


When I looked at this,  it looked like something that your group approves
before it is sent out.  I told Dave that I approved of putting it on the
internet only if it is something that you or your group already had approved
of.  Please let me know if it is something you approve.

Stacy
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 11/29/99 04:18
PM ---------------------------

David Forster
11/23/99 05:38 PM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: newsletters

Stacy,

Attached is a copy of a newsletter which we currently send out to customers.
This is written internally and is currently distributed by fax.

I assume that as we are already distrubuting this information by fax, there
should be no concerns about publishing on EnronOnline?

Note that the only portions we would put online are:

Weather
Gas Storage
Commentary

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 23/11/99 23:34
---------------------------

Frances Ortiz
17/11/99 16:42
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: newsletters


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread66.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread66.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread66.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack66.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack66.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Kay,

 Joe Curreri at ENSR wanted me to let you know that he is still waiting on
the signed extension letter (Master Services Agreement).  Once you initial
it, please have someone deliver it to Janet Dietrich as she then needs to
sign it before sending it back to Joe at ENSR.  Please let me know if there
is anything I need to do to get this process completed.  Thanks.

Stephen
x 33890


THANKS A BUNCH!

"Moore,Denise I" <denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us> on 11/03/2000 12:05:53 PM
To: ddavis@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Mailing list

Dana,

     Here is a partial list of addresses I had here at work.  I will have to
go home and find the others.  Do you have a fax machine at home?

Denise

 <<SEEDSLAB.WPD>>

They are already set up as labels in WP6.0 and these should be transferable
to Word.

 - SEEDSLAB.WPD


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041718.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred:   9.46 / Final:   9.45)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron on 10/17/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

Nicholas O'Day
10/17/2000 08:01 AM
To: Tori L Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Office Opening

Tori,
I understand that Rosalee is out of the office. In her absence, I thought you
should be aware of the following.

PM Mori has confirmed that he is available to meet with Mr Lay on 1 November.
However, he has advised that he will be unable to attend the office opening.
Parliament is in session at the moment and budget debate has been delayed as
a result of extended debate on the amendment to the electoral rules. The PM
has advised that he will be in budget deliberations on the 31st.

The PM has proposed that he be represented at the office opening by his #2 -
Hidenao Nakagawa  -  Minister of State and Chief Cabinet Secretary. Nakagawa,
as Minister of State, is Japan's official spokesperson and will open the
office in the name of the PM.

Nakagawa is generally regarded as being responsible for the PM's policy
direction and plays a vital role in supporting PM Mori's fragile leadership.
Significantly, Nakagawa is currently responsible for the government's
Information Technology (IT) policies, the Government's most important
initiative at present. He is vice-chair of the Government's IT Strategy
Conference and  formerly held the post of Vice Minister of MITI.

In my view, this is not a bad outcome. In some respects we get the best of
both worlds. The office is opened in the name of the PM and we have the
attendance of the man who is likely to be more highly regarded among those
who will attend the office opening.

I will send separately to Tori Wells, with a copy to you, the draft meeting
schedule.

kind regards


Return-Path: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (rly-yg01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.1]) by
air-yg05.mail.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 18:00:52 -0500
Received: from  mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.152.140.66]) by
rly-yg01.mx.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 18:00:36 -0500
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id XAA19726 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 23:00:07 GMT
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33]) by
dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA24406 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 86256874.007E6242 ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:26 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <86256874.007E61A1.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 17:00:29 -0600
Subject: Re: Mark-to-Market
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000
05:00
PM ---------------------------

From: Wade Cline@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 01/28/2000 07:17 AM ZE5B

To:   Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J
      Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: Mark-to-Market  (Document link: Vince J Kaminski)

Sandeep,

Can DPC sell to MSEB and have EIPL buy an equivalent amount of power from MSEB
at another spot on their grid, and then EIPL sell to the 3rd party state?

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao@ECT
01/27/2000 04:00 PM

To:   Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade
      Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  Re: Mark-to-Market  (Document link: Wade Cline)

Sandeep:
     I met with Bob today and discussed the deal structure we put together. On
the mark-to-market issue, Bob and his colleague Wess told me that as long as
payments are tied to one particular plant, we cannot m-t-m them. They had same
problem with plants here in the US (like the peaking plants) and they had to
separate the plant from power sales to be able to m-t-m the assocated
cashflows.
What they did is: they sold power from the plant to an outside party and
bought
it back from them at completely different (multiple) locations. The buyback is
not tied to any specific plant and is marked to maket. Even if Enron can
somehow
mark-to-market a deal with DPC, it can do so for only 50% of the cashflows
because only 50% of DPC is owned by outsiders.  And a simple loan to an
affiliate cannot also be marked to market.

     Bob was suggesting that if EIPL buys options from DPC and from some other
plants and in turn sells power to AP or Karnataka then we could have a case
for
m-t-m. Politically DPC selling power to EIPL may not be the best solution, to
put it rather mildly!

Our alternatives, as I see them, are
1. Do the deal as we structured it. The only difference is that Enron doesn't
mark it to market and income is      earned only in 2002-03.
2. Do the deal as we structured it. EIPL/Enron then sells the contract to
another party at a profit. The problem, of course, is finding this party and
forking part of the profit to them.
3. Same deal, except revenue securitization is done through an outside party
in
India (not EIPL).

Bob said he will think about the issues some more this week. Let me know when
you will be here next week so we can meet with Bob together. I will be going
to
Boston for Tuesday and/or Wednesday (Feb.1-2). I can book an appt. with Bob
for
us.

Sandeep Kohli@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/23/2000 09:45 PM

To:   Robert Butts, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao@ECT
cc:   Vince Kaminski, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ananda
      Mukerji, Jaiprakash Desai/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:  Mark-to-Market

Bob,

I wanted to continue the analysis on mark-to-market that I had spoken to you
about on the phone.

I thought that it was getting very difficult explaining the whole transaction
by
phone, so I am having Krishnarao who is in Vince's group explain the
transaction
to you.

Krishna has been helping us structure the deal here in India, and he has just
returned to Houston from India after working with the team here.

He will seek an appointment with you to explain the transaction.  I would like
you to please spend some time with him, and then based on the discussion
please
send us a note detailing how sucha a transaction would be marked to market.

Please cosider the fact that currently there are no such transactions from the
Indian side.  This is a very important transaction for us, and we may need to
repeat this in coming months, hence setting up the system to account for these
maybe well worth it.  Also, what I am concerned about is that there will be an
Enron India (EIPL) account in India based on Indian GAAP, and upon
consolidation
there will be a US GAAP accounting in the US.  It is here that we would like
to
have mark-to-market accounting.  EIPL is structured through Mauritius, and
then
Caymen Islands.

Another key question to consider is that when we m-t-m the transaction in the
US
there will be a tax accruing in the year of m-t-m (say 2000).  However, in
India, as a result of the accrual accounting, there will not be any income
showing till the year 2002 or 2003.  We will need to know how that would get
treated, and whether there is a way to get credit for the tax payable in the
US.
I am also confused about whether US tax would be levied, since none of the
income is being brought back into the US (remains overseas - subpart-F and
other
concerns).

Finally, we have been working hard in structuring a fixed price contract and
getting a fixed for floating swap in the US (this is still not allowed to
Indian
Corporates).  I need you to think about this too, and see if some type of
accounting will solve this issue.  Krishna knows what I am talking about, and
will brief you on the same.

Krishna - Please walk Bob through the three structures we had worked here.

Look forward to your help and comments.  This is going to be an exciting
project
for us all.

Regards,
Sandeep.


Ed & Lauri,

Attached for your review is the latest revision of the Interruptible
Transportation GTC for Enron On-line as well as the Brief Transaction Summary.
FYI:  Both Gerald and I will be out on Thursday afternoon and all day Friday
for the ENA Legal Conference.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Dave

I wouldn't mind waiting a few weeks to go to Portland.  PRC is going to eat
up a lot of time in the next few weeks and it would be nice if Mike Swerzman
was in town when we went.  However, whatever you want "I will follow"(U2).

Lavo


Rob,

Thanks. We are always glad to help you.

Vince

Rob Bradley@ENRON
09/28/2000 05:34 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Stinson Gibner & Hector Campos

Ken Lay gave a high profile presentation on the current natural gas supply
and price situation at a recent conference held by the Interstate Oil and Gas
Compact Commission, and some of the best graphs came from work that Stinson
and Hector did (see the attached, slides #11, #12, #14, & #15).

I really appreciate their research and hope to be able to use their talents
again for presentations for the Office of the Chairman..

- Rob

Robert L. Bradley Jr.
Director, Public Policy Analysis
Enron Corp.
P.O Box 1188, Room 4724a
[1400 Smith Street 77002]
Houston, Texas 77251-1188

(P) 713-853-3062
(F) 713-646-4702

Assistant: Joan Stransky 713-853-4702
jstrans@enron.com


As discussed on today's conference call, in an effort to satisfy the Presiding Judge's request to remove the protected status of materials, Mirant proposes the following action concerning exhibits it filed Nov. 6 pursuant to the protective order in the EL00-95 proceeding (namely, MIR-3 and MIR-4) :
Mirant proposes to formally withdraw its submission of the protected versions of Exhibits MIR-3 and MIR-4, leaving the redacted versions of these exhibits as the only versions of MIR-3 and MIR-4 in the record.  As noted on the conference call today, Mirant believes that the limited amount of material redacted from these exhibits (certain PPAs pursuant to which Mirant incurred emissions costs) is not relevant to the issues in this proceeding.
If any party objects to or has concerns about Mirant undertaking such action, please let me know no later than November 28, 2001 at noon, EST.
Thanks much,
Jeffrey Jakubiak
202-274-2892
Attorney for Mirant


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
03/14/2000 05:31 PM ---------------------------

MARY THERESA FRANKLIN
03/14/2000 05:31 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H
Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

We have had an unexpected death in my family, requiring me to be out of the
office the rest of the week.   I am sorry the timing is so bad, I will
contact Robert first thing next week and we can workout a game plan going
forward.  Thanks for your patience...

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
03/14/2000 05:08 PM ---------------------------
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carrie
Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

The contracts are the transportation agreements on CNR.  Robert sat with
Chris Germany yesterday and to our knowledge these gathering contracts have
never been set up in our systems.

I'll be in meetings until 3:30, so please feel free to talk to Robert Allwein
down on 30.  Actually, I think it would be a great idea to spend a few
minutes talking about this to get on the same page before anyone gets too far
into the process and we discover that rework is being done.

MARY THERESA FRANKLIN
03/14/2000 01:35 PM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CNR Contracts

I just meet with Gloria to decipher what the status is on all her E-mails.
She's identified all the remaining rate changes needed for today's payments,
the transport contracts needed to be setup, Sitara numbers needed for
contracts already set up, and the meters needing to be linked to transport
contracts.  I'm still fuzzy on this whole process and am not sure what Robert
Allwein's 60 or 70 contracts relate to... are these purchase contracts?
I'll be up shortly, working with Brenda... let's see if a meeting would be
good.


Suzanne:
I'm pretty flexible.  The only days that appear to be bad if its done during
lunch would be Friday, June 2 and Friday, June 16th.  As for ideas, I have
NOTHING right now, but i know that Julia has some used stuff that she is
going to give me.  We are planning on buying the furniture before the end of
May.  As for the rest, I really hope to have all of that bought before the
middle of June just in case.
Carol

	Suzanne Adams
	05/16/2000 10:26 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Welcome Back!

Fabulous news!!!!!!!!!!!   Julia just called and they are wanting to do a
baby shower for you.  I told her that I thought you needed to pick the date
since you have so much going on.  Just thought I'd give you the heads up so
you can be thinking of a date.  We would do it up here.  You also need to be
thinking about what you need because people are going to be asking!

I'm so excited about the baby!!!!!!  We had a great time!!!!!

	Carol St Clair
	05/16/2000 10:08 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Welcome Back!

Suzanne:
Welcome back!  How was your trip?  Stop by when you get a chance or we can
talk about it tomorrow at lunch.  We got great news yesterday - the placenta
is gradually moving to the right place and it appears as if I am out of the
"danger" zone.  The baby is in the right position now and is a little over 4
pounds so I am very, very happy and relieved.  Your good vibes are working.
I'll see my other doctor on Thursday and confirm everything with him but if
Ric sees me now on the treadmill at the club, tell him not to worry!  (Just
kidding - I'm not sure I could run now even if I wanted to).  talk to you
soon.

P.S. - How can I find out about where I stand currently re unused vacation
time?

Carol


Hello everyone.
?
Chris Davis has sent me a formal letter  of resignation from the Compaq
Board.? As you all know, Chris and I had  discussed her schedule and the
difficulty she was having balancing?her time  between her new position, the
cross country? move and her desire to be a  fully involved board member.?
?
I will be sending Chris a note from the  board, but it might also be a good
idea if some of you dropped her a  note.
?
Lucie
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Davis
To: 'lucie@jhmedia.com'
Cc: 'linda.auwers@compaq.com' ; Chris Davis
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 2:39 PM
Subject: Compaq Board Resignation

TO:????  ??????? Lucie Salhany
???????  ??????? Chairman,  Corporate Governance Committee
???????  ??????? Compaq  Computer Corporation

FROM:??  ??????? Chris A. Davis

SUBJECT:???????  Resignation from the Compaq Board of Directors

DATE:??  ??????? September 28, 2000

??????? You may  have seen that ONI Systems filed today for a follow-on
common stock offering and  a convertible debt offering.? As a result of these

financings and the associated activities, attending  the September and
October Compaq Board meetings would not be possible.? In  addition, as you

know, since accepting my current position at ONI  Systems, the company's
requirements on my time have made it difficult for me to  be as proactively

involved with Compaq as I feel a board member should  be.

??????? Therefore,  I believe it is in our mutual best interest that I submit
my resignation from  the Board effective September 25,  2000.???????? I
certainly enjoyed

my involvement with the Board and I appreciate the  Board's understanding of
my decision.


This looks ok to me.

	Melba Lozano
	12/06/2000 04:46 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: REVISED - EOL description change

---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 04:46
PM ---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  12/06/2000 04:45 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@E
cc: Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Jacobellis/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REVISED - EOL description change

Please approve the following change to the product description.  If you have
any questions please let me know.  Steve needs this approved as soon as
possible.  I need to make sure this language works for both one day deals and
term deals.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

 Bolded for your ease of reference:

From:

A currency Transaction with Risk Management & Trading Corp. ("RMT") under
which either (A) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to buy
from RMT, Counterparty shall pay a Fixed Amount and shall receive the
Floating  Amount, or (B) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer
to sell to RMT, Counterparty shall receive the Fixed  Amount and shall pay
the Floating  Amount. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction
will be a Determination Period; provided however, that in the event the term
of the Transaction is less than one calendar month, the Determination Period
shall be the term of the Transaction. The Notional Amount per Determination
Period shall equal the volume submitted by the Counterparty via the website
divided by the number of Determination Periods during the term of the
Transaction. The Fixed  Amount payable per Determination Period shall equal
the product of  the Notional Amount per Determination Period multiplied by
the price submitted by the Counterparty via the website. The Floating Amount
payable per Determination Period shall equal the product of the Notional
Amount per Determination Period multiplied by the Index. The Payment Date
shall be the Valuation Date.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Nov 2000
to the Termination Date of 31 Mar 2001.

The Index for each Determination Period shall be the USD/CAD rate equal to
the rate set forth on Rueters page BOFC under the headings 'Bank of Canada';
'Canadian Dollar' Exchange rates';'Noon', opposite the caption 'USD' as of
12:00 p.m. noon, Toronto time, on the Valuation Date. The Valuation Date for
each Determination Period shall be the last Business Day of such
Determination Period.(DELETED)
The price is quoted in Canadian Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be US Dollars,
and each unit of volume shown represents one million US Dollars ($1,000,000).

To:

A currency Transaction with Risk Management & Trading Corp. ("RMT") under
which either (A) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer to buy
from RMT, Counterparty shall pay a Fixed Amount and shall receive the
Floating  Amount, or (B) for the case in which Counterparty submits an offer
to sell to RMT, Counterparty shall receive the Fixed  Amount and shall pay
the Floating  Amount. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction
will be a Determination Period; provided however, that in the event the term
of the Transaction is less than one calendar month, the Determination Period
shall be the term of the Transaction. The Notional Amount per Determination
Period shall equal the volume submitted by the Counterparty via the website
divided by the number of Determination Periods during the term of the
Transaction. The Fixed  Amount payable per Determination Period shall equal
the product of  the Notional Amount per Determination Period multiplied by
the price submitted by the Counterparty via the website. The Floating Amount
payable per Determination Period shall equal the product of the Notional
Amount per Determination Period multiplied by the Index. The Payment Date
shall be the Valuation Date. The Valuation Date for each Determination Period
shall be the first Business Day of such Determination Period.(Added)

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Nov 2000
to the Termination Date of 31 Mar 2001.

The Index for each Determination Period shall be the USD/CAD rate equal to
the rate set forth on Rueters page BOFC under the headings 'Bank of Canada';
'Canadian Dollar' Exchange rates';'Noon', opposite the caption 'USD' as of
12:00 p.m. noon, Toronto time, on the Valuation Date.
The price is quoted in Canadian Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be US Dollars,
and each unit of volume shown represents one million US Dollars ($1,000,000).

Thank you,

Melba
58986


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042406.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 103.69 / Final: 103.14)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Sharpen you pencils,

Clark PUD is out for another RFP to purchase term gas supplies for their
Combined Cycle (250 MW) plant located in Clark County WA.  The total demand
for the plant is about 48,000 MMBtu/day peak (30,000 from Sumas and ~17,000
Stanfield).

Attached is a template for the response.  I have highlighted in RED the
sections I would like quotes on.  We will be working with John Griffith on
the structured transaction sections.  I you have comments let us know.

The RFP is due tomorrow so we would like some feedback today if possible.