Every year, a holiday gift is sent from the Executive Committee and is
normally a donation to a charity of Enron's choice.  This year, we have tried
a different approach. Elyse Kalmans and Kathy Mayfield from Community
Relations recommended an on-line service called Chairtygift.com.  Each
recipient can select the charity of their choice from many hundreds in the
United States.  Should they choose to not go on-line and select a charity,
the amount of that person's gift will default to DePelchin.  Kathy is
receiving thank you notes by e-mail so I wanted to share with you.

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/12/2000 11:01 AM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

I have received two other thank you notes for the Charitygifts.  Upon
redemption, there is a place for recipients to send a thank you via email and
currently I am set up as the person to receive them.  Is that ok?  I don't
mind and can forward them to you as I get them or save them and get them to
you all at once.  It's great feedback and I think Ken would enjoy seeing
their responses.  It seems as though people are enjoying getting them and
being able to choose one of their favorite charities.  Let me know what you
think.  I am also drafting a letter to go to DePelchin letting them know that
we are doing this.  Would you like for it to come from Ken?  Thanks, Kathy

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

Kewp76@aol.com on 12/11/2000 07:51:30 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Kathy,
Eileen and I were most pleased to have the opportunity to donate to Southern
Tier (NY) Hospice Corporation via the Charity Gift Card that Enron Executive
Committee sent us.  Enron displays uncommon leadership in humanitarian
activities as well as the business world.  Our thanks go to Ken and the
Executive Committee.
Very truly yours,
Buddy and Eileen Leech


Thanks for the update.

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 10/03/2000 01:14:44 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Bazor Ridge Gas Plant

Susan,

Harvey Petter is keeping in contact with the dispatcher, but I want you to
know that the plant will not be up until at least next week.

Stevens


F.Y.I.

  California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/01/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A4
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
  high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
  plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
  rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

  Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
  kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
  charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
  commodity price.

  The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
  average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
  deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
  state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
  with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

  Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
  rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
  schools and hospitals.

  In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
  Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
  general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
  exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
  up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

  Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
  rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
  no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
  it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
  December 2003.

  Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
  future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
  December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
  tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
  new projects such as a new transmission line.

  The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
  construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
  review the plans.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Paul,

Could you set aside some time today to talk to me about the recent Kennedy Oil deal in addition to 2 other deals.  These other deals were discovered in our bid week preparations, and are causing our desk some pretty big negative Prior Month Adjustments.  So, we need to get these resolved.  The first one is the Williams / wic deal. The deal #'s for that are 121890,854562, & 1068893.  The reason for the split of this deal is b/c our books changed names.  The second deal in question which needs to be resolved a.s.a.p. is a Red Rock Energy LLC deal #133661.  This deal is being booked to Denver in Sitara, but in Tagg the risk is going to Keith Holst and Mike Grigsby.

Please look over these deals and let me know when a good time to talk will be.  Thank you!

Carole C, Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell


Thanks.

Gabriel Monroy
04/06/2000 09:08 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 218918, McIntosh Partnerships

Done,
Sorry, I thought somebody else had taken care of this.

Gabriel


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/03/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Elaine Concklin
	08/02/2000 05:27 PM

To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dea
Crum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie
McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Clements/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Zabawa/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Henry
Baker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kleb/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sophie
Patel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Please see Henry's note below.

Thanks!  Elaine

---------------------- Forwarded by Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron on 08/02/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Henry Baker                           08/02/2000 04:02 PM

To: Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron
cc:

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Attached are the preliminary 2001 - 2003 Business Plan and Assumption
schedules for NNG and TW.  Please review and update these schedules for the
2001 - 2003 Operating and Strategic Plan.  Keep in mind that these are the
preliminary assumptions that we will discuss in more detail during the
meeting on August 11th.  Please note that the attached Business Plan is a
high level version of the Focus Areas included in the detailed ET&S Business
Plan that was approved by the officers back in March.  Please provide us with
any updates/revisions by Wednesday, August 9th.  If you have any questions,
please give Henry Baker a call at (713) 853-4797 or Elaine Concklin at (713)
853-5521.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.


I am interested in becoming a member of the Foundation.

Gerald R. Nemec
1403 Banks
Houston, Texas 77006

What else do you need from me to get the membership going and how fast can I
set it up?  Thanks


Chris, i cannot find this dealticket in Sitara??????which means i cannot path
Please look at the "highlighted red" below.

thanks
joann

---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2000
03:37 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Joann Collins                           01/18/2000 10:46 AM

To: kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Xtra Gas bought @ COH

FOR 1/19 ONLY:
K38021  NOW=14163

kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/18/2000 09:31:33 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Xtra Gas bought @ COH

That's when the deal was done apparently.  I don't care when I get the gas as
long as it's before the month's over.  I guess you didn't know about it??

Joann_Collins@enron.com on 01/18/2000 10:23:16 AM
Please respond to Joann_Collins@enron.com

To: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:

Subject: Re: Xtra Gas bought @ COH

the date is 1/13???

kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/18/2000 09:19:36 AM

To:   Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:  Xtra Gas bought @ COH

On 1/13 Brian Perrone bought 14,163 dth from Chris Germany at COH 7-5 at
$2.60.

Please let me know when/how you would like to deliver this gas.
Thank you Joann.


probably because jeff's out,, but let's go ahead and have it

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CANCELLED - Trader's Roundtable

Yes, I'm around all week and, I don't know why the Tuesday meeting was
cancelled.

Gary


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011520.txt


March 8, 2001
Notice # MS-15

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 8, 2001,
the following member(s) have given notice of intention to transfer their sole
Membership within the Exchange:

Peter Hillyard
(Barclays Bank PLC)

Peter V. Grotezinger
(Valero Mktg. & Supply)

John L. Wilson
(Valero Mktg. & Supply)

Thomas DeLoach
(Mobil Oil Group)

Michael Goldberg
(Mobil Trading B.V.)

John Simpson
(Mobil Trading B.V.)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(MS-15)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Dear friends and collegues, I'm pleased to announce the birth of Florencia Mora.  She was born today at 8:11 AM at Hermann Hospital.  Rosalia and Florencia are healthy and happy and will be back at home by Thursday.

Regards

Mauricio
mao_mora@yahoo.com


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043009.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 09:28 AM
---------------------------

Clement Lau
03/03/2000 07:15 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Peaker Overview


are you really in nyc?


<<Escrow Agreement Enron Salmon LLC.DOC>>  <<ENA.Ltr.Forms.DOC>>
<<Entitlement.Ltr.DOC>>  <<ENA.Consent.DOC>>  <<Salmon - Resolutions of
LLC.DOC>>  <<LLC Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC>>  <<Consent of Salmon
LLC electing officers.DOC>>

Kay:

We have attached execution copies of the following documents for execution
by ENA and/or Salmon LLC:

1.  Escrow Agreement (we will change pages to delete brackets on ENA wire
instructions and to add Pegasus wire instructions as soon as we get info
from Pegasus);
2.  ENA Letter re Forms of Agreement;
3.  Entitlement Letter Agreement;
4.  ENA Consent and Agreement;
5.  Consent of Sole Member authorizing the turbine acquisition and the
issuance of membership interests;
6.  First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (we will
fill in the dates later); and
7.  Consent of Members of LLC electing new directors, and Consent of
Directors of LLC electing new officers (we will type in names once they are
provided by Pegasus).

You should have the following documents:

1.  Schedule of Fees for Escrow Agreement; and
2.  Certificate of Incumbency;
3.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement;
4.  Bill of Sale; and
5.  Notice of Intent to Purchase Specified Option Property.

The following agreements are not yet available for signature by ENA:

1.  Escrow Disbursement Instructions (Greg says he thinks the one we
originally submitted was okay, but he wants to review again - he had put it
on hold due to the securities entitlement account issue)
2.  LLC Membership Certificates (need membership certificate books)
3.  Secretary's Certificate of LLC (waiting on revised draft from Paul
Hastings - they have promised to re-send it shortly.  If I don't get this in
an hour or so, I'll have my secretary re-type it and will forward to you.
Unfortunately, this one is the other incumbency certificate which requires a
number of signatures).

I have convinced Greg Lang that since the GE Consent and Agreement refers to
the fact that Salmon LLC has granted a security interest in the Turbine
Contract to the lenders, the GE Consent and Agreement should be executed by
Salmon after Pegasus is in control of Salmon.   Therefore, I have not
enclosed the GE Consent and Agreement in this package.

Please send over a signed copy of the Confidentiality Agreement for our
records.  If you have any questions or comments, please advise.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com

Enclosures

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Escrow Agreement Enron Salmon LLC.DOC
 - ENA.Ltr.Forms.DOC
 - Entitlement.Ltr.DOC
 - ENA.Consent.DOC
 - Salmon - Resolutions of LLC.DOC
 - LLC Agmt Enron Turbines Delta Power.DOC
 - Consent of Salmon LLC electing officers.DOC


LAST CALL for BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS AND NEWS for this week's EnTouch
Newsletter.

Please submit your news by noon today.

Thanks!
Kathie Grabstald
x 3-9610


(See attached file: HPLN0206.xls)

 - HPLN0206.xls


Wade/Rob/Bruce:

I think we should reconfigure the MOU to constitute a binding obligation to purchase and sell rather than a MOU that would lead to a definitive agreement.  We are trying to force an answer, it seems to me at this stage of the game, a definitive offer should be put forward for acceptance or rejection.

Thoughts?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cline, Wade
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Hughes, James A.; Walls Jr., Rob; Lundstrom, Bruce; Dutt, Ranabir; dcsturme@ben.bechtel.com; richard.allison@gecapital.com; pnagarva@ben.bechtel.com; Gurunath, Mohan; Kraske, Paul; Mathis, Robert
Subject:	Draft MOU regarding equity sale

Attached is most recent draft of MOU regarding equity sale of DPC.


Sorry about the Greek in the first paragraph of my last E-mail.  I still
can't figure out how I did that.  All I said was, as you know, CMUA filed a
complaint with FERC asking for cost-based rates and introducing an outline of
an answer to the legal issues.

Under the FERC rules, we are required to file an answer to the complaint.  I
have also asked Seabron for an estimate for answering the economics
assertions raised in CMUA and PG&E's filings.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 11:18 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
10/18/2000 10:37 AM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi Nicolay, carrrn@bracepatt.com
Subject: Proposed Answer of CMUA's Complaint

As you have already heard, California Municipal Utilities Association filed a
complaint with FERC asking for cost based rates. The following is a brief
outline of an EPMI/EES answer to the complaint.  The answer is due Friday.
Please send me any comments ASAP.

? The complaint should be rejected because it wrongly assumes that the
Commission has no option to ensure just and reasonable rates but to require
cost based rates because there is no low cost solution to the problems
currently faced by the California markets.  We should attach our white paper
to our protest and state that the paper explains how these problems could be
solved at little or no cost to the customers.
? I list here, for your information, the reasons CMUA claims that markets are
not competitive (these reasons will not be re-listed in the pleading).
? 2000 prices greatly exceeded 1999 prices without regard to load.
? zonal constrained prices, even in the off-peak hours, do not reflect
competitive outcomes for low load conditions.
? even small players can be price setters
? The changes required are additional generation, transmission, and demand
response and will cost tens of millions of dollars and take lengthy periods
of time to implement.
? There is no evidence that markets will ensure just and reasonable rates in
the near future.
? CMUA asserts that with the advent of electric restructuring, the Commission
has increasingly allowed energy and ancillary services to be sold at
market-based rates.  However, CMUA is wrong in the context of the West where
there has been market-based trading of electricity before electric
restructuring, since the FERC approved the Western Systems Power Pool,s
contract in 1991.  The Commission,s rules didn,t create the wholesale market
in the past, the market did and it was running fine until it was messed up by
certain market rules were imposed that are enumerated in our paper.  The
problem is not the market-based rates.  The problem is the market rules.
? CMUA,s motion does not address how market-based rates would be calculated
for marketers that do not sell power from their own resources, let alone
reflect the trading of basis points.  Almost all of the power EPMI sells is
power it has bought from some other marketer or generator.  Many of EPMI,s
deals are done through brokers such that EPMI does not find out the identity
of the seller until after a deal has been struck.  Accordingly, EPMI gets no
information about the cost of the underlying generation.
? If FERC doesn,t try to fix the market but simply takes away our
market-based rates, since there,s is no basis for us to set cost based rates,
we would go out of business.  Besides there,s no reason to take away our
market-based rates because we are not exercising market power.  So if FERC
could fix the problem with a less onerous solution (as we,ve proposed in our
white paper), requiring cost-based rates would constitute a regulatory taking
of our business and we would have to be compensated using the constitutional
standard.
 CMUA does not provide any expert testimony to support its position.  Rather,
its evidence is &drawn from materials prepared and testimony delivered by the
California ISO and other public sources.8  Beyond the difficult evidentiary
issue posed by the fact that CMUA cannot swear to the veracity of information
produced by third parties, EPMI would have no opportunity to conduct
discovery or cross-examine of such &witnesses.8


Attached are the weekly money market rates.

Please let us know if there is anything we can help you with!

We all hope that you and your families had a wonderful Thanksgiving!

Talk to you soon,

Julie


Boyd,

I would think that at the least we would want you to attend the hearing.  I
also don't see any harm in you reviewing the data responses.

Kay

"Boyd J. Springer" <bjspringer@JonesDay.com> on 12/20/2000 09:14:46 AM
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc: kay.mann@enron.com

Subject: 00-0759 & 00-0760

The attached gives notice of what I believe would be a scheduling (status)
conference for the Master Sales approval proceedings. This is the first
information I've received about these matters since receiving the data
requests a couple of weeks ago. Let me know how active you would like me to
be in these matters. Shoud I request that Jerry Fox circulate drafts of the
data responses? are you being kept up to date by Peoples on communications
with staff? Should I plan to attend the hearing?
----- Forwarded by Boyd J. Springer/JonesDay on 12/20/00 09:07 AM -----

g.fox@pecorp.com

                                         To:     r.delara@pecorp.com,
k.donofrio@pecorp.com,
                                            s.fiorella@pecorp.com,
m.klyasheff@pecorp.com, t.walsh@pecorp.com,
                    12/20/00 08:58
d.wear@pecorp.com
                    AM                   cc:
bjspringer@jonesday.com
                             Subject:     00-0759 &
00-0760

At my request (I will out of town from December 29 through January 5), the
hearing scheduled for January 3 at 11 am has been continued to January 10
at
11 am.

                                          Jerry Fox

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========


Ok, as long as you try your "darnedest"!  :-)

Should we also ask Dave Perrino or anyone else?

Should I coordinate with Joseph to get a room in your office?

Jennifer

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	06/20/2001 03:55 PM

		 To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Meeting with CERA next week

Let's do it. I'll do my darnedest to make it.

Best,
Jeff

	Jennifer Thome
	06/20/2001 02:59 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting with CERA next week

Jeff:

As I told you I was planning to do, I have arranged a meeting with CERA next
week (I will be in town for the infrastructure conference) on Wednesday, June
27 at 9am in the Enron office.  We will meet with Mike and Peter (see bios
below). Please let me know ASAP if this does not work for you.  I explained
to Mike that we really appreciate their research and just wanted a quick
meeting with them face to face.

Jennifer

Michael Zenker
Director, Western North America Energy
Oakland, CA

Michael Zenker has over 15 years, experience in the energy industry. He is an
expert on wholesale electricity and natural gas markets in western North
America. Mr. Zenker has extensive experience with California,s new
electricity market and with power generation strategy and asset divestiture.
He has assisted clients with retail marketing strategies and in procuring gas
and electricity, and gas and electric transmission capacity. Mr. Zenker was
most recently the Manager of Energy Trading at Southern California Edison,
where he was responsible for electricity and gas trading, and dispatching
Edison,s nuclear, coal, gas/oil, hydro, and power contract resources. He was
also responsible for natural gas transportation and storage at Southern
California Edison. Mr. Zenker holds an MBA and a BS in Nuclear Engineering
from the University of California.

Peter F. Moritzburke
Associate
Oakland, CA

Western North American energy
Western power markets
Western and regional market dynamics
Western wholesale electricity markets
Generation asset divestiture
Generation asset values
Western fundamentals analysis
Peter Moritzburke specializes in the analysis of western US electricity and
gas markets and evolving regional energy market dynamics. He has experience
in analyzing both US and Latin American energy markets. Prior to joining CERA
he worked with the Independent Energy Producers Association in California
assisting in negotiations of agreements for the Western Power Exchange
(WEPEX). Mr. Moritzburke holds a master's degree and a BA from the University
of California.


Hi, Jeanie,

AAP is in review.

McMichael -- we should revise in the next day or so.

Bridgeline -- will be out to you tomorrow.

Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Jeanie Slone/ENRON@enronXgate 06/01/01 05:52 PM 	   To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: Outstanding Items

Hey guys,

Just checking on when the following might be available:

-sign off on Affirmative Action plan so that I may have Lavo sign
-new agreement for Ed McMichael
-Bridgline Assignment Letters for two new employees.

With PRC, I'm afraid I will forget these.  Thanks for your assistance.


What about lunch today(fri)

	"Ileana Blanco" <iblanco@bracepatt.com>
	05/24/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: <RSander@ECT.Enron.Com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Just checking in

Are things settling down for you?  Do you  want to do lunch after the
Investiture on the 31st?  Ileana. P.S. My frontal lobes are killing me.....Do
you happen to know any .......?


Here's my solution.  FERC should tell the Cal ISO to file the stakeholder
developed congestion management proposal arguing that it has been agreed to
in the stakeholder process and that the ISO Board has no authority to do
something else because they are not properly constituted.  We could also
argue that the FERC should order the ISO executives to hire a consulting firm
that will propose a slate of candidates and argue for a government similar to
what has been proposed for RTO West.  This will help us in ultimately putting
the West RTOs together.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 02/01/2001 04:59 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cal ISO Not Filing CM Proposal at FERC - EPMI Response?

Mary informs me that the Cal ISO has filed (1-30-01) with FERC that it will
not be filing a new Congestion Management proposal at FERC as required in
previous Orders.

She thinks now is an opportune time to challenge the legitimacy of the new
Cal ISO Board (Gov Davis' actions).   I also think that we need to put
forward our own solution (if we have one).

I would appreciate everyone's opinion as to the (a) likelihood that FERC
would finally address the matter, (b) end result if FERC does deal with the
issue, (c) and the politics in Sacramento / CPUC of taking this position.
Also, who else is going to weigh in on our proposal?

Jim


Attached are the latest SWAP group calendars.  Let me know if you have any
revisions.

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


We have a master swap agreement in place with Energy West Incorporated, a
CANADA corporation.  Your list shows "Inc." instead of "Incorporated", and
that it is a US corporation.  Is this the same counterparty?