ICF Kaiser Prices used for Genco.
Ben


Attached are the Burlington FT contracts that have used alternate points from October,. 2000 through September, 2001.
I'll work on Amoco and Conoco.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


Tana,

Since I did not see FX trades excluded, I presume that we can confirm FX
trades and options under this master.  Please let me know.  Thanks


Attached is Annex B.  Just tell them they need to fill in blanks in guaranty.


he was already on someone's team

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 10/27/2000 08:10:30 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: election night

Do I have Trent Green or does someone else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:11 PM
To: lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com
Cc: Bass, Jason; daphneco64@bigplanet.com
Subject: Re: election night

That sounds like a good idea.  I guess you will be taking the day off?

-Eric

"Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 10/23/2000 11:26:59 AM

To:   jason <jason.bass2@compaq.com>, eric preston bass
      <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:   KATHY BASS <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Subject:  election night

Hi Guys. How's it hanging? You still alive  Eric? Long time no see. I'm
thinking about grilling a few things, like chicken and scrimp, on election
night, Nov. 7. Are you guys interested in attending? Guests are included.
Let me know. Have a good week.-Dad


SK - Printed and put in your working group folder.  Also put as "FYI" next
scheduled meeting.  mm

Follow - up to our first meeting -

We had very good participation.  In the absence of some technical
difficulties, we would have had 100% participation.

As our discussion showed, people bring different issues and needs to the
group.  It seems that this group will function best if we serve as a source
of information and resources to each other.  Our collective knowledge is
capable of helping many different individual problems; we just need to figure
how to get the right information to the people who need it.  Our first task
should be to sort through this wide ranging topic and start to focus on some
specific deliverables.

Attached is an updated roster of the team, and a listing of the subgroups and
some ideas of what the subgroup should consider.  These ideas are not meant
to restrict but give some additional clarity.  Please note the subgroup
membership and the designated team leads, and begin your discussions.

Our next meeting will be Friday, February 4, 9:30 am - 11 am Central Standard
Time.  More details on phone/video conferencing and a full agenda will be
given later.  At the meeting, each subgroup should share with the larger
group their thoughts on the directions to be taken by the subgroup.  At that
time, we can all offer additional comments.

Thank you!


Please go to clickathome.enron.com, sign in, then go to internet options.
When you get to the internet options page then you can check qualification.
The following page is what you will see.  Click on qualify me ofr MSN. Let us
know if you need further assistance.

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           02/20/2001 06:13 PM

To: clickathome@enron.com
cc:

Subject:

E:mail messages says to check website to determine whether or not DSL is
available at my home.  However, I don't see a spot on the website to check
that information.  Can you provide more details?


Davis is saying he's had discussions with us about taking a loss on our
debts??  Have we had any such conversations w/ him? ( I told the media
yesterday we hadn't been contacted by him...)
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 03/01/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt on 03/01/2001 08:54 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Merrill Lynch Report: Governor Davis Comes to Wall Street

Karen,

FYI.  Ann

Governor Davis Comes to Wall Street
3/1/1 9:47 (New York)

                      M E R R I L L  L Y N C H        Research Bulletin
  Fixed Income Research                               Reference Number
10906001
  United States                                       Mar/01/2001 09:47
  Leo J. Kelser                                       (1) 212 449-7803

Highlights of This Issue

Governor Gray Davis of California met with a group of sell-side and rating
agency analysts in New York yesterday.  The Governor outlined his plan for
restoring the utilities to financial viability so that they can meet their
obligations.  Below we summarize a few highlights from the meeting.

Trying to Fit Solution Within Existing Rate Structure

The Governor talked about the need to find a solution to the utilities'
problems within the context of their existing rate structures. He indicated
that the temporary 9% rate hike from January 2000 would be made permanent and
that a 10% rate reduction that went into effect in January 1998 would be
reversed in March 2002.

Status of Negotiations with PG&E

As we noted in a February 26(**th) comment, the Governor has reached an
agreement in principle with Southern California Edison (EIX: B3/CC) to address
that utility's past under-collections.  He hopes to also have an agreement
with
PG&E within the next 30 days, suggesting that progress was made in particular
in the last 2-3 days.  However, the Governor acknowledged that reaching an
agreement with PG&E was more difficult due to its larger under-collected
balance and lower rates compared with SCE.

Some Generators Agree to Haircut

The Governor indicated that a couple of unnamed generators have voluntarily
agreed to accept less than 100 cents on the dollar for their past due
receivables. When pressed about which parties they've had constructive
discussions with, he identified Williams (WMB: Baa2/BBB-), Enron (ENE:
Baa1/BBB+) and Dynegy (DYN: Baa2/BBB+).  We note that most of the generators
and marketers with exposure to California have established reserves against
possible losses.  Importantly, the Governor said that he hoped that the banks
and bondholders would not be asked to take a haircut.

Prospects for Legislation and Possibility of Ballot Initiative

The Governor said he is quite confident that he can reach an agreement with
the
utilities that the legislature can support.  Although he admitted that he
couldn't prevent someone from proposing a ballot initiative, the governor said
that in the end, the acid test with the public is how it affects their pocket
books.  Thus, if there is ultimately a ballot initiative, Governor Davis is
optimistic that the public will be supportive of his plan given the limited
impact on electric rates.

Status of Defaulted Utility Debt

As we have commented in the past, it appears unlikely that the resulting
legislation will pass with the required 2/3majority to go into effect
immediately.  Accordingly, there will be a several month lag before the
utilities receive any cash.  In response to a question, it appears that the
state will not step in to help the utilities pay off any maturing or defaulted
commercial paper.  But the Governor and his advisers hope that legislation
will
provide enough certainty so that the companies can get bridge financing.
Essentially, it appears the Governor is leaving it up to the utilities to find
the money from their banks.

Governor's Strategy to Keep the Lights On

The Governor stated that a key reason that deregulation failed in California
was that no new power plants were built in the state for over twelve years.
In
the intervening time, demand caught up with supply.  In response, he has
proposed various conservation initiatives and is trying to expedite the
construction of new power plants.  He set a goal of having 20,000 megawatts
(mws) of new supply on line by 2004.

In addition, the governor highlighted the need for additional investment in
the
transmission infrastructure.  In particular, he cited the need to expand the
capacity to import more power from Arizona as well to improve the ability to
move power from south to north within the state. He suggested that part of the
rationale for the state taking over the utilities' transmission grids was to
ensure that the additional investment takes place.  He also suggested that the
state would lease the transmission lines back to the utilities to allow them
to
continue to operate them.

In the meantime, the focus is to move away from California's over-reliance on
the spot market.  In that vein, Calpine (CPN: Ba1/BB+) yesterday announced the
signing of two long-term contracts with the state's Department of Water
Resources (DWR).  One of those contracts was to sell up to 1,000 mws over a
ten-
year term.  The other was to provide up to 495 mw of peaking capacity under a
20-year contract.  Earlier in February, CPN had reached agreement with the DWR
on a separate 10-year contract for an additional 1,000 mws.

(EIX, WMB)  MLPF&S was a manager of the most recent public offering of
securities of this company within the last three years.
Copyright 2001 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S).
All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. This
report has been prepared and issued by MLPF&S and/or one of its affiliates and
has been approved for publication in the United Kingdom by Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Limited, which is regulated by SFA; has been considered
and distributed in Australia by Merrill Lynch Equities (Australia) Limited
(ACN
006 276 795), a licensed securities dealer under the Australian Corporations
Law; is distributed in Hong Kong by Merrill Lynch (Asia Pacific) Ltd, which is
regulated by the Hong Kong SFC; and is distributed in Singapore by Merrill
Lynch International Bank Ltd (Merchant Bank) and Merrill Lynch (Singapore) Pte
Ltd, which are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.  The
information herein was obtained from various sources; we do not guarantee its
accuracy or completeness. Additional information available.
Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes an offer, or an
invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or any options,
futures or other derivatives related to such securities ("related
investments").  MLPF&S and its affiliates may trade for their own accounts as
odd-lot dealer, market maker, block positioner, specialist and/or arbitrageur
in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments, and may be on
the opposite side of public orders.  MLPF&S, its affiliates, directors,
officers, employees and employee benefit programs may have a long or short
position in any securities of this issuer(s) or in related investments. MLPF&S
or its affiliates may from time to time perform investment banking or other
services for, or solicit investment banking or other business from, any entity
mentioned in this report.
This research report is prepared for general circulation and is circulated for
general information only.  It does not have regard to the specific investment
objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific
person
who may receive this report.  Investors should seek financial advice regarding
the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies
discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements
regarding future prospects may not be realized.  Investors should note that
income from such securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security's
price or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less
than originally invested.  Past performance is not necessarily a guide to
future performance.
The bonds of the company are traded over-the-counter.  Retail sales and/or
distribution of this report may be made only in states where these securities
are exempt from registration or have been qualified for sale. MLPF&S usually
makes a market in the bonds of this company.
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or
income of any security or related investment mentioned in this report.  In
addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, whose values are influenced by
the currency of the underlying security, effectively assume currency risk.
 Provider ID: 10906001
-0- Mar/01/2001 14:47 GM


Kate, same thing on this trade. I think it should be FPL Energy Power
Marketing b/c I received a confirm on it. Secondly on the confirm it states
that hour 0100-0600 is priced at $95.00 and then again at hours 2300-2400.
7-22 is priced at $140. However I do not show in the system 1-6 and 23-24 at
$95. Did he forget to put in the off peak or is FPL incorrect.

Thanks,


Per our t/c, please see the attached.

(See attached file: mtaylormemo.doc)
 - mtaylormemo.doc


I thought that was the point of requesting a December 1 date -- so that the
Commission had a longer period to act.  Since we requested an effective date
with more than 30 days advance notice (but less than 60 days per 154.207 of
the regs), then the Commission has until the effective date to act? ( NGA
717c.)

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           11/13/2000 12:16 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW options filing

At this mornings staff meeting, Stan asked about the status of TW options
filing,  Shelley indicated that she felt it would be on the Nov 21 st
agenda.  The 30 days to act is up on Nov. 16th, if the FERC hasn't done
anything aren't the tariff sheets approved as filed?? If that answer is yes,
isn't an order after that date required to meet the SS 5 requirements??
Just thinking about the timing-  MK


---------- Auto Krafters --- and --- Focus Performance ----------

Thank you for choosing us as your source for parts. The items listed below have been shipped today. If you have any questions, please reference the following when you Reply to this message:

Your  Customer #:  CM270732

Bill to:

JESS K. HYATT
18715 HICKORY ASHE DRIVE
HUMBLE  TX  77346

Ship to:

JESS K.  HYATT
18715 HICKORY ASHE DRIVE
HUMBLE  TX  77346

Subtotal: $82.80
Shipping: $7.95
Tax: $0.00
Total: $90.75

 Items shipped today:
(quantity, part number, part name, unit price, extended price)
1	C7ZZ-10732	BATTERY TRAY - 67-70 COUG & 67-70 MUST	16.95	0.00
1	533-62R	TRUNK FLOOR EXT RH - 69/70 COUGAR	26.95	26.95
1	533-62L	TRUNK FLOOR EXT LH - 69/70 COUGAR	26.95	26.95
1	C3AZ-3C651A	POWER CYL.  BOOT INSULATOR KIT	12.95	12.95
1	C9WY-13520K	TAILLIGHT HOUSING TO BODY SEAL - 8 PC	15.95	15.95

Expected items that are not listed above are either on Back0rder or are being drop shipped directly to you from the manufacturer. (Back0rder items were listed in a previous 0rder Acknowledgement) Back 0rdered or drop shipped items usually arrive in 10-14 business days.

Estimates for normal shipping times:
1-2 days to VA, WV, PA, NJ, DE
2-3 days to MI, IN, OH, KY, NY, VT, NH, ME, CT, RI
3-4 days to MN, WI, IL, MO, AR, LA, MS, KS
4-5 days to ND, SD, NE, OK, TX, CO
5-6 days to MT, WY, NM, AZ, UT, ID, NV, CA, OR, WA


The above confirm was sent to Janet Wallis for forwarding to customer.  I
used the Sitara number 592020 as the Deal Number.  call if you have any
questions.


1 of
D. Autry  31
M. Pittman  31

2 of
H. Moore 31
D. Jackson 21
J. Graham 11


When is the MISO set to go commercial?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Will, Lloyd
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:49 PM
To:	Bentley, Corry; Baughman Jr., Don; Comeaux, Keith; Allen, Thresa A.
Cc:	Roan, Michael; Rodriquez, Andy; Presto, Kevin M.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; May, Tom
Subject:	RE: Market Trials Orientation

Thanks Mike please keep you eyes open for similar initiatives in other markets.

Corry,Don, Keith, & Theresa our objective in attending the sessions below is to identify the gaps between how we operate in the market today and what the new world will be.  Your focus should be on new tools and process that will be required.  Please coordinate any regulatory/market concerns about the MISO with Michael.

Cory please consider sending a rep for scheduling requirements.
Don please consider sending a rep for market trials and hourly requirements.
Keith please consider sending a rep for control area operations requirements.
Theresa please consider sending a rep for market trials requirements and possible settlement issues.

Please forward to others that would be interested.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roan, Michael
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 3:01 PM
To:	Will, Lloyd
Subject:	FW: Market Trials Orientation
Importance:	High

Lloyd, attached is the email from the MISO.  Let me know who the contact person within your group is, i will work with Christi on a more formalised process to ensure that we are ready to enter the RTO environment on 12/15/01.

regards
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelli Williams <KWilliams@midwestiso.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kelli+20Williams+20+3CKWilliams+40midwestiso+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Averbeck, Steve; Borum, B.; Brown, Jeff; Cazalet, Edward; Collins, Doug; Doying, Richard; Fahey, Reem; Fielek, Michael; Gillis, Gary; Harvill, Terry; Hennen, David; Idle, Charles; Keller, Jim; Landgren, Dale; Learner, Howard; Michael Stuart (E-mail); Mork, Rob; Nelson, Robert; Paul Barber (E-mail); Pauley, B.; Pofok, George W.; Procario, John C.; Reed, Harvey J.; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Eric; Samuel C. Randazzo (E-mail); Simpson, John L.; Small, Michael; Stanton, James; Strand, John G.; Taylor, David; Trawick, John; William D. McCarty (E-mail); Wolfe, Ellen; Yaeger, Scott; Yeager, Walt; Ziegner, D.
Subject:	RE:  Market Trials Orientation
Importance:	High

VIA EMAIL
Friday June 29, 2001
The following  letter was sent today to the Midwest ISO Transmission Owners:

As we  move into the Market Trials period, I would like to reiterate how much the  Midwest ISO appreciates your support of our ongoing activities.
To facilitate your participation in Market  Trials, we are providing two types of informative, interactive orientation  sessions.  One covers the  Electronic Scheduling Process and the other provides an overall Market  Trials Orientation.  These  sessions are designed to provide an essential overview of the drills, scenarios  and reviews necessary for your people to actively participate in the Market  Trials.
The Electronic Scheduling Process  session is available on three different dates in July and the overall Market  Trials Orientation session is offered on two different dates.  Because of the interactive nature of  these sessions the class size must be limited. Ideally, we would prefer no more  than two participants from each company. Please select the individual(s) from  your company who will attend these sessions, and forward the attached  registration brochure to them.   Please advise me if your needs exceed the requested attendance guideline  of two people per company. We will make every effort to accommodate your  request.
We recognize that asking you to sustain a  steady commitment of time, resources and manpower is an exacting demand.  Your confidence that your Market Trials  participants gain as much knowledge about the Midwest ISO's operational  abilities is equally important to us.
We are grateful for your continued support  of the Midwest ISO and look forward to working with you during the Market Trials  period.

Sincerely,
 [IMAGE]
James  . Torgerson
President and  CEO
The Midwest  ISO

cc:  Advisory Committee, MISO Market Trials  contacts

 - orientation registration 3.pdf << File: orientation registration 3.pdf >>
 - clip_image002.jpg << File: clip_image002.jpg >>


Mike--- here is our proposed language which is drafted in accordance with the
recent group discussion.  Would you please circulate it among your group, and
let me know if it is acceptable?  Thanks.


Please print this as well.  I'm driving in now.  Thank you again.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 08:05 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sarah Dennison-Leonard" <sdleonard@earthlink.net>
      02/16/2001 06:30 PM

Please respond to "Sarah Dennison-Leonard" <sdleonard@earthlink.net>
To: "Kristi Wallis" <kristiwallis@sprintmail.com>, "Bud Krogh"
<ekrogh@serv.net>, "Barney Speckman" <bmspeckman@aol.com>, "Judy Welch"
<judyrtowest@earthlink.net>, "Chris Elliott" <chrisrtowest@earthlink.net>
cc:
Subject: TIGR- Follow-up to February 7, 2001 Tariff Integration Group Meeting

Hello, members of the RTO West Stage 2 Tariff Integration  Group.
?
Like so many of you, I seem to be in a perpetual state of  triage these
days.? I apologize it has taken me so long to follow up on our  meeting of
February 7, but at last I have prepared a summary of the various  assignments
and tasks we identified at that meeting.
?
Attached for your reference is a "work tracking document"  with the
information from the February 7 meeting.
?
The work tracking document (along with various other  materials posted since
the February 7 meeting) is on the RTO West Website  at:
?
http://208.55.67.64/Stage2TariffIntGrpMain.htm
?
Thank you very much!
?
Sarah Dennison-LeonardKrogh & Leonard506 SW  6th Avenue, Suite 750Portland,
OR? 97204Phone:? (503)  219-9649Fax:? (503) 224-1895E-mail:?
sdleonard@earthlink.net
 - Feb 16 2001 TIG Working Document.doc


I had the IT guys reschedule my outlook migration.  They should call you tues.  How about doing it wed night when I'm on a plane?  thanks df


All:  At Clint's request, please find below the form of assignment for
execution among Enron North America Corp., Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner &
Smith and Lehman Brothers Finance S.A..  I will have to fax the term sheet to
you as I can't find it in my email.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 05:33 PM -----

	"Franz, Philip" <pfranz@lehman.com>
	10/23/2000 11:14 AM

		 To: "'Clint.Freeland@enron.com'" <Clint.Freeland@enron.com>,
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Rosica, Paul" <prosica@lehman.com>, "Karna, Angie" <AKarna@lehman.com>,
"Franz, Philip" <pfranz@lehman.com>
		 Subject: Assignement Agreement Draft

Clint/Sara,
For your review per Paul Rosica.

 <<ENRON.Assignment.10.23.doc>>

Regards,
Phil

Phil Franz
Transaction Management/Equity Derivatives
Lehman Brothers
(212)526-8482
pfranz@lehman.com
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and
> should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an
> offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its
> subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
> information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
> such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>

 - ENRON.Assignment.10.23.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 08:10
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
09/25/2000 07:37 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Lisa:

I don't have a problem with this to the extent Chris Calger has approved the
expenditure which I would guess would be approximately $500k. If these guys
are simply trying to execute a purchase option while they try to firm up
their deal, they should probably do it as a stand alone agreement (since we
don't need to involve WestLB in purchase options).

In any case, the key point here is Chris' approval of what is probably around
a $500k expenditure (of course, the option should only be for around 10% of
this amount). We don't need to worry about WestLB fees, etc., since this is
an ENA (West) Originations prospective deal.

Regards,

Ben

	From:  Lisa Bills @ ENRON                           09/25/2000 07:16 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Ben, given that they want to use the existing LM6000 contract for the GSU
change order, I wanted to know if you were okay with this interaction with
GE.  Also, by using the existing LM6000 contract, they will be using up
capacity available for other LM6000 related equipment.  Are you okay with
this, i.e., you believe there is capacity available for them, and any
suggestions on how you would like to see them pay for the usage since the
LM600s have already paid the upfront structuring fee and ongoing commitment
fees.

Please call to discuss.
Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 07:12
PM ---------------------------

Bill Williams@ECT
09/25/2000 06:22 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Dean
Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Hello Lisa
I wanted to contact you to let you know that we (ENA West) are attemtping to
help the ENA San Francisco guys locate a Generator Step Up Transformer for
the Pleasanton project.  ENA is responsible to bring an LM6000 and GSU to the
project.  We cannot use one of the ABB transformers (Don Hammond checked with
ABB, and the as built configuration simply cannot be used or changed to meet
the needs of ENA SFO's application.  As such, we have had to go out and find
a GSU.  The good news is we have found one through GE.  It will meet SFO's
delivery schedule.  We have not received a quote, nor have we signed anything
(but we want to ASAP).  In talking to Dale Rasmussen, I understand we would
need to purchase this major component through a West LB structure.  GE
prefers to sell us the GSU through ENA's existing contract with GE.  As such,
I am asking what steps you (or Kay) would like us to take in setting up a
purchase option (or whatever is the correct noun name for reserving, buying a
needed GSU in a timely manner).

This e mail is meant to be a starting point in dialog.  Please contact me on
Tuesday to discuss whatever is necessary.

Thanks.

Bill Williams
ENA Portland
503-464-8958


Daren,

I have flow at this meter for the first, 118 Dth.  There is an expired
purchase from Highland at the meter, but, this deal ended August 31st.  HPL
had a deal with Highland in October to purchase these volumes (deal ticket
418382).  I think that the deal needs to be extended, it looks like the valve
was not completely shut by 9 am.  Pat has asked that this issue be resolved
today, so, your assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Mary


Gordon:

Attached is the Deemed ISDA and fax cover page for Deal No. Y61166.1 between ENA and the referenced counterparty.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie


Thanks for the Pappa's gift certicate.  For a woman who can't remember the
last time that she cooked dinner, this will come in very handy!  Thanks, too,
for the beautiful flower arrangement that has graced my desk for the past two
days.  I will take that home with me tonight and I will enjoy it during my
upcoming days off.

I hope that the Christmas holiday brings each of you the joy of the season --
and some rest, relaxation and time with family and friends.  Thanks for your
enthusiasm in your role at Enron and for your continuing and tireless
effort.  It is through working with each one of you that I find my job to be
fun.  1999 was a year of outstanding accomplishments for Energy Operations -
a direct result of your contributions.  I look forward to meeting new
challenges in 2000 through continuing to work together.


Here is an email from our counsel in Mexico. I have copied you on another
email which tells him that you will be taking over from me.

---------------------- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000 11:32
AM ---------------------------

Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx> on 03/29/2000 11:04:09 AM
Please respond to Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx>
To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Crist?bal Perdomo <cperdomo@lvha.com.mx>, "Shari Stack"
<sstack@ect.enron.com>, "Max Yzaguirre" <Max.Yzaguirre@enron.com>, "Jaime
Williams" <Jaime.Williams@enron.com> (bcc: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Incorporation of Financial Trading Company

Please see Memorandum transmitted herewith.
 - att1.htm
 - 000328 Incorporation of Financial Trading Company.doc


Here's the new version with attachment.


Vince & Shirley:

 Here are the details about my remaining 2000 vacation and their use:

 Vacation currently available now: 136
 Next week 3 days (Dec 27-29)    24
     ---------------------------
 Vacation Remaining on 31-Dec:  112
 Officially rolled over to 2001:    40
     ---------------------------
 Unused 2000 vacation:    72

Thanks,
Krishna.
---------------------- Forwarded by Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT on
12/18/2000 02:41 PM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
12/11/2000 06:28 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rollover of my vacation days to 2001

Vince:
 I would like to rollover my vacation days for 2000 remaining at the end of
this year to 2001. I could not use us all of my available vacation this year
because of the following reasons:

1. As you know, I have been supporting three business units (EES, EPG & Enron
India) this year. All these units had difficult and relatively long projects
that required experience in energy markets, derivatives pricing and business
knowledge that I had gained over the last few years at Enron.

2. There has been a significant change in the team members reporting to me. I
now have six people under me compared to only three at the begin of the year.
Of the current six members, five joined us only this year and most of them
didn't have any prior work experience, thus requiring a lot of my time in
recruiting, training and mentoring.

3. Given that I had to visit our Bombay office in January, 2000 for a
business trip (10 days) and will need to go there again in January, 2001, I
could not take leave from my work for the other two units (EES & EPG) for an
extended period of time.

So, in summary, this year has been a long and challenging one, and as a
result, I could not take vacation for more than a few days. I request you to
grant the rollover of my remaining vacation to next year.

Currently I have 136 hours of vacation available and , of these, I expect to
have 112 hours unused at the end of this year.

Thank you,
Krishna.


When we move people between groups - what's the practice with regard to 1)
title and 2) salary?

Is it usual/necessary to make adjustments? It is not in the UK - but I want
to check.

B.


Shirley,

Please, put on my schedule.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

Veronica Valdez
01/05/2000 04:58 PM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy, Rick L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam
Metoyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enterprise Wide Risk Management Meeting, January 21

This is to confirm  the meeting will take place on Friday, January 21 at
12:00 - 5:00p,  at the DoubleTree Hotel, 400 Dallas Street.
The meeting room is Suite 407.

Those in attendance:

 Rick Buy
 Ted Murphy
 Rick Carson
 Vince Kaminski
 Dave Gorte
 Kevin Kindall
 Grant Masson

Lunch will begin at 12:00 noon and a snack will be served at 2:30p.

Please give me a call with questions at x31881.


User ID:  enron
PW:        library

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Law.com/tx" <tx_case_alert+409979.153596706.1@reply.law.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:01 AM
To:	Hu, Sylvia
Subject:	Texas Case Alert, October 25, 2001

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

       L A W . C O M / T E X A S

           C A S E  A L E R T

                  for

        O C T O B E R 2 5,  2 0 0 1

<http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933692>

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

***  Current News on Law.com/TX  ***

Big Texas Law Firm Settling With Victims of Swindlers
The Associated Press
A major Texas law firm that once served President Bush is paying
millions of dollars to settle claims the firm was complicit in
fraud perpetrated by two of its clients. Locke Liddell & Sapp has
paid $30.5 million in the past two years to settle class-action
lawsuits by investors in enterprises run by convicted swindlers
Brian Russell Stearns and Russell Erxleben. The deals turned out to
be elaborate Ponzi schemes.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933693

Read more Texas legal news
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933694

***  Texas Supreme Court  ***

GOVERNMENT LAW - REDISTRICTING
In Re: Perry
Legislative immunity applies to the activities of the Legislative
Redistricting Board members and their aides in developing a
redistricting plan; there could be a circumstance, albeit
extraordinary, that might constrict the grant of legislative
immunity when, as in this case, a plaintiff alleges that the action
violates the Equal Protection Clause, plaintiffs have articulated
no basis for restricting legislative immunity in this case. Supreme
Court of Texas, No. 01-0979; Posted October 17, 2001.
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933695

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

The law.com/texas Case Alert is a service of law.com/texas located
at http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933696. SHARING THIS ALERT WITH SOMEONE WHO IS
NOT A SUBSCRIBER IS UNLAWFUL. By using this service, you also are
agreeing to abide by our terms of service. If you haven't read
them, please go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933697.

To register for a free trial to law.com/texas, go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933696 and click on the Trial Subscription button.

For other information please reply to: mailto:tx-info@corp.law.com

For our full Privacy Policy, please go to
http://tm0.com/sbct.cgi?s=153596706&i=409979&d=1933699

TO BE REMOVED FROM MAILING LIST:
If you would like to be removed from the law.com/texas Case Alert
mailing list, you can unsubscribe by simply replying to this email
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

You are subscribed to the law.com/texas Case Alert with the
following e-mail address:sylvia.hu@enron.com

Copyright (c) 2001 law.com. Registered in the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office. All rights reserved.


The contestants ain't got a chance!

-----Original Message-----
From:	GRIFFIN, BARBARA [SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]>
Sent:	Tuesday, April 17, 2001 8:23 AM
To:	ALAN ALVESTAD (E-mail); Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> .
COM Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> . COM Heineke (E-mail);
K5GAT@AOL <mailto:K5GAT@AOL> . COM K5GAT@AOL <mailto:K5GAT@AOL> . COM com
(E-mail); Kim Howry (E-mail); Lynda Munkres (E-mail); lvan_johnson@hotmail
<mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com lvan_johnson@hotmail
<mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com com (E-mail); NealS@Hump
<mailto:NealS@Hump> . com NealS@Hump <mailto:NealS@Hump> . com com (E-mail);
PGordon@SFASU <mailto:PGordon@SFASU> . EDU PGordon@SFASU
<mailto:PGordon@SFASU> . EDU (E-mail); Raymond Parker (E-mail);
TEaker1065@aol <mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com TEaker1065@aol
<mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com com (E-mail); Virginia James (E-mail)
Subject:	FW: Subject: Survivor 2

-----Original Message-----
From:	Betty.Politte@claires.com <mailto:Betty.Politte@claires.com>
[mailto:Betty.Politte@claires.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Betty.Politte@claires.com]>
Sent:	Monday, April 16, 2001 7:36 PM
To:	eddieferguson@webtv.net <mailto:eddieferguson@webtv.net>
Subject:	Fwd:Subject: Survivor 2

Subject:	Survivor 2

A major network is planning the show "Survivor 2" this winter. In
response,
Texas is planning "Survivor: Texas Style." The contestants will
start in  Dallas, travel through Waco, Austin, San Antonio, over to
Houston,
and down to Brownsville. They will proceed up to Del Rio, on to El Paso,
then to Midland/Odessa, Lubbock, and Amarillo. From there, they proceed to
Abilene, and on to Ft. Worth and back to Dallas.
Each will be driving a pink Volvo with a bumper sticker that reads, "I'm
gay,    I voted for Al Gore, and I'm here to confiscate your guns."
The first one to make it back to Dallas wins.


Daily blessing

http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless128.htm

The Dream

http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor45.htm

your printer is running...and you WILL need ink!!!  check out the great
prices at MrInkman!!  I sure use more ink than I like to think about, and
these folks keep me stocked up.  They are reliable, honest,and best of all
least expensive!!  check em out
http://www.daily-blessings.com/inkman.htm

Secrets Revealed...Were hot dogs ever made of dogs? How do astronauts use the
bathroom in space? What's so French about French fries? For the answer to
these and other questions,  get the Secrets Revealed mailing from
MailBits.com.

http://go.mailbits.com/Trivia.asp?136888.1

Do you check your email more often than your calendar?  Click below!
http://daily-blessings.com/reminder.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


TO: Jeff Keeler
            Mike Terraso
RE:  Denmark Approves Ratification of the Kyoto Protocol
DATE: May 30, 2001
______________________________________________________________________________
_________
Yesterday, the Danish Parliament passed a resolution approving the Kyoto
Protocol, allowing Denmark to ratify the treaty jointly with other EU member
states.  Denmark is the first EU member to take such strong government action
related to ratification of the Kyoto Protocol.  Currently, Romania is the
only industrialized nation to have ratified the treaty.
While Denmark's action is largely symbolic, it puts pressure on the U.S. and
other EU members to keep the international negotiations on track and puts
mild pressure on other EU members to approve the treaty in preparation for
joint ratification.
Please see Dow Jones article below.
Background
The Bush Administration is currently reviewing U.S. climate change policy
with the aim of releasing an alternative approach to the Kyoto Protocol in
late June.  The international climate change negotiations are scheduled to
resume in mid-July in Bonn, Germany, but could be postponed based on the
substance of the U.S. plan or a lack of progress during informal Ministerial
meetings in late June.
EU Ministers have publicly endorsed a EU ratification strategy by 2002;
however, U.S. opposition to the treaty could delay or shift this approach.
Environmental Strategies is providing input to the Bush Administration and
Congress on cost-effective, market-based approaches to address climate change.
Remarks by Danish Energy Minister
Danish Energy Minister Svend Auken made these remarks about ratification:
"Denmark is sending a strong signal that we still support the Kyoto Protocol,
affirming our active contribution to protecting the environment we live in."
"It is even more important in light of the American rejection," he continued,
"for countries that support the Kyoto Protocol to show clearly that the Kyoto
process is continuing."
I will keep you posted on new developments.  Please let me know if you have
any questions.
Please see the Dow Jones article and link to the Agence France-Presse story
below  (in French).
(Agence France-Presse
<http://www.lapresse.com/groups/public/documents/convertis/mon_p1059443.hcsp

Denmark Approves Ratification Of Kyoto Climate Treaty

05/30/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

COPENHAGEN (AP)--The Danish parliament has approved the 1997 Kyoto
global warming treaty in a move the environment minister called a strong
signal to the U.S. administration that the ratification process will
continue despite rejection by President George W. Bush.

In an 88-9 vote late Tuesday, the parliament in Copenhagen gave its
go-ahead for European Union member Denmark to ratify the protocol when
all 15 E.U. members jointly will sign the document. No date for the
common ratification has been set.

"In light of the American government's rejection of the Kyoto agreement,
it's even more important that the countries that support it clearly
demonstrate that the Kyoto process continues," Environment Minister
Svend Auken said Wednesday by telephone.

The U.S. has been heavily criticized for its environmental policies
after Bush rejected the Kyoto treaty in March, saying the mandatory
pollution reductions would harm American economic interests and
promising to offer alternative measures.

In Kyoto, Japan, the industrialized countries agreed to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by an average 5.2% by 2012 from 1990 levels.

Auken stressed the importance of maintaining a dialogue with the U.S. -
the world's biggest polluter - on environmental matters.

"The way forward is not to take a defensive position but to show
leadership," he said. "Without the E.U. it is difficult to imagine a
successful global climate policy that will really make a real difference
to the environment."

E.U. leaders have pledged to go forward with the ratification process
despite the U.S. rejection and say it's possible to get the necessary
approval from 55 countries.

World delegations will reconvene in Bonn, Germany, in July for another
attempt to draft details of the treaty.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Lisa Jacobson
Enron
Manager, Environmental Strategies
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006

Phone: +(202) 466-9176
Fax: +(202) 331-4717


Mark:

	I did not want to make a big deal of this at the OGC Meeting, but if a legal transition team is formed, I would like to be considered for membership.  I feel that my strengths are what may be needed on such  a committee.

Thanks,

Jeff


Are they coming?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Capestany, Mari
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:21 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	The Maple Leafs

I have been notified that TD Securities will be coming Wednesday morning for due diligence on NetCo.  They will arrive between 8 and 8:30am with a team of 9 people and plan on being here through Thursday night.   I will be coordinating things for them on the corp dev side.  Please let me know who your commercial coordinator is and the schedule for the first day presentations.

The data room is currently located in ECN3371; however we are trying to find a room that would be more accomodating for such a large group.

I will send you the names and titles of TD's team as soon as I get it.

Thanks,
Mari Capestany
x33519


I am reviewing my ethical obligations to see if I can pounce on this reward.

	Steve Hall <steve.c.hall@enron.com>
	Sent by: "Report mailer problems to http://www.quicken.com/support"
<nobody@nowhere.com>
	04/11/2001 05:02 PM
	Please respond to Steve Hall

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Calif Atty Gen Offers $50M Reward In Pwr Supplier

California hits a new low.

------------------------- Article -------------------------

Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:15 PM

<!--TEXT-->

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--California Attorney General Bill Lockyer is offering a
reward of more than $50 million to anyone who has information that will help
his
office prosecute power suppliers accused of gouging the wholesale electricity
market in the state.

Lockyer's Energy Emergency Task Force has been conducting an investigation for
several months into allegations that generators and natural gas marketers have
engaged in "any wrongful act which may have resulted in reduction in the
California (electricity) supplies or increase in the price of natural gas or
electricity."

"My office is conducting an aggressive investigation into whether energy
providers have violated any laws," Lockyer said. "It is possible that one or
more members of the public can help with information, and if so, the financial
reward to such a person or persons could be enormous."

Gov. Gray Davis earmarked $4 million of state funds so Lockyer's office can
investigate claims of collusion, profiteering, price gouging and other
anticompetitive behavior on the part of generators.

Generators such as Reliant Energy Inc. (REI) and Duke Energy (DUK) have
vehemently denied the claims, saying their behavior in the wholesale
electricity
market has already been investigated by federal regulators and various state
agencies, all of whom have concluded that the companies did not violate any
antitrust laws.

Recently, however, the California Independent System Operator, manager of the
state's electricity grid, concluded a study that found the same companies
overcharged California $6 billion for electricity during part of 2000 and
early
2001.

Generators said the high prices are due to an imbalance in supply and demand
in
the state and the high price of natural gas.

The ISO has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order generators
to refund the money to the state's utilities. FERC agreed, but gave generators
the benefit of the doubt and asked the companies to substantiate their
electricity prices or refund the money.

Lockyer, whose investigation has yet to uncover any wrongdoing, according to a
spokeswoman in his office, is now seeking a whistleblower.

"Anyone who provides information leading to the successful prosecution of a
false claim action may be entitled to percentage share in the award," Lockyer
said. "Since billions of dollars may be recovered, the award to an informant
could potentially range from $50 million to the hundreds of millions of
dollars."

Davis has frequently referred to out-of-state generators as "greedy
profiteers"
and one Sacramento lawmaker has introduced legislation that would place a
windfall profits tax on sales of electricity generators earn in the state's
wholesale market.

Lockyer said the state should not be left holding the bag for "greedy business
decisions of generators, marketers and utilities" adding that he will seek
criminal and civil penalties if his investigation finds that generators gouged
the wholesale electricity market.

"Justice requires that those who have reaped unconscionable profits at the
expense of California pay back what they owe."

-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 310-666-9986;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This article on the Excite Money and Investing Channel is produced by
Quicken.com, the objective source for making the most of your money.
Visit Excite Money and Investing at http://quicken.excite.com next time
you need financial news, stock quotes, portfolio services, or information
about taxes, mortgages, and insurance.


This is the e-mail I mentioned yesterday.  It is not exactly what had been
described to me and I do have concerns with it.  My preference would be to
limit the clause to the providing of letters of credit whenever we ask (as
opposed to any security in form and from a provider satisfactory to us).  I
understand that London legal was doing some tinkering with the language but I
haven't seen anything from them yet.  Let's discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/15/99 09:18 AM ---------------------------

David Hardy
07/09/99 11:54 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT,
David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Credit Clause - online trading GTC's

Mark,

Following the Online Trading conference call, here is the first stab at the
Credit Clause to include in the GTC's for less credit worthy counterparties :-

"If, for any reason [ Enron ] determines it is necessary to obtain security [
Enron ] may in its sole discretion and within one business day upon notice to
[ Counterparty ], require [ Counterparty ] to provide [ Enron ] with
satisfactory security, in a format and from a provider acceptable to [ Enron
].

Without prejudice to any legal remedies available to [Enron] and without
[Enron] incurring any other costs, losses or damages (whether to
[Counterparty] or to third parties) arising from any delay or other, [Enron]
may withhold or cease delivery (whether or not delivery has commenced) until
[Enron ] receives prepayment, or  cash collateral or an acceptable letter of
credit or guaranty, as the case may be. All bank charges and other fees,
commissions, costs and expenses incurred with respect to furnishing security
to [Enron] shall be for the account of [Counterparty]."

The second paragraph provides a remedy for contracts involving  physical
deliveries, but  requires some re-working to provide Enron the right to
terminate specific contracts with a counterparty for trades which are purely
financial contracts, if the Counterparty failed to provide adequate security
in suggested time frame.
Please call if you have any questions.

Regards

David


set up a quick (no more than 30 mins) about this with me, nowlan, reck.
thanks.  jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:20 AM ---------------------------

Daniel Reck
11/02/2000 05:15 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: diesel

One of the tranport dot coms has asked if we could post diesel hedges on
their site.  I know we don't (maybe no one does) trade diesel.  But there is
a huge a need for this product in the transport world.  Any thoughts on how
to do this?

--Dan


I recognise that I am new to the debate.  However, my concern about focusing
on open access terms is that non-discrimiantory access deals primarily with
competitive issues.  It does nothing to directly address the lack of
transmission capacity and generating capacity.  I'm not certain what path 15
information is, and I presume FTRs are Firm Trading/Transmission rights, but
these deal with use of existing capacity and has nothing to do with
incentives to expand capacity to meet demand.  Presumable, market
participants would use access to existing capacity to take advantage of the
high prices being experienced in the california market, which seems to be
caused by a combination of a lack of capacity and odd trading rules that work
to exacerbate prices in times of shortages.

However, we could argue that competitive access is related to the incentives
of incumbent generators to keep new suppliers from entereing the market.  I
think I have a way to ask a follow-up question that will address this point.

I will send a revised draft soon.

Mary Hain@ECT
04/10/2000 10:34
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
jdasovic@ees.enron.com
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dbva@radix.net@ENRON

Subject: Re: Draft Questions for Hoecker

I disagree with you about question 2.  While I agree that transmission acess
wasn't the number one problem in California this summer, transmission access
is not close to being perfect in California (for example PG&E controls the
information about path 15 and the ISO still has not auctioned off 100 percent
of the FTRs in the market) and certainly corrections to these problems would
make the market more liquid which would help to alleviate the price spike
problem.  So even though access is not the number one or even the number two
problem causing price spikes this summer it contributed and it is one of the
biggest problems with the California market, relatively, and it is something
that FERC can fix (as compared to fixing hedging and underscheduling which
they seem content to leave to the state regulators).  Perhaps Tom could fix
his question accordingly.

Sarah Novosel@ENRON
10/04/2000 07:41 AM
To: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, dbva@radix.net
Subject: Re: Draft Questions for Hoecker

Tom:

The questions look good, and I agree with Rick's comments regarding RTO
participation.  We should try and pin Hoecker down on the problems with the
voluntary approach.  I have a couple of additional thoughts on the questions:

In question two, you should also ask Hoecker directly about the time it takes
to interconnect.  The interconnection process can take a long time due to
utility holdups that are not necessary.  I would ask something like, "What is
the length of time it typically takes to interconnect a generator to the grid
once the generator makes the request for interconnection?  Can FERC take
action to shortened this time to help accelerate the development and
operation of new generation in California and elsewhere throughout the
country?"

On question three, you have asked me in the past whether open access for all
uses of the grid would have helped California this summer, and as we have
discussed, while it may have helped, lack of transmission access was probably
not the primary cause for the problems in California this summer.  Given
that, could this question backfire on us?  What if Hoecker says no, expanding
FERC jurisdiction wouldn't have had much impact on California this summer?

Finally, you may want to send these questions to some of our other California
people, including Jeff Dasovich, Sue Mara and Mona Petrochko, to make sure
that the facts stated in Question No. 1 are accurate.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sarah

Tom Briggs
10/03/2000 02:48 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Draft Questions for Hoecker

Attached please find draft questions to be provided to Sen. Gorton for his
hearing on NW price spikes to be held Thursday. I hve tried to design
questions that focus on FERC jurisdiction.  However, i may have med the
questions too specific and detailed.  please give me your comments and ideas.


-----Original Message-----
From: timo.teras@poyry.fi [mailto:timo.teras@poyry.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:59 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Cc: tuula@foex.fi
Subject: Re: Another request

Monika,
As you may notice, I've changed from the FOEX office into my P?yry office.

In addition to the material I already sent to you on PIX pulp indexes earlier today, please find attached an older presentation (from the time FOEX was still an Exchange and NBSKP was the only index-series launched) which may shed some more light into the issue.

Best regards,
Timo T.

	"Causholli, Monika" <Monika.Causholli@enron.com>

2001-07-23 20:08

        To:        <timo.teras@poyry.fi>
        cc:        <timo.teras@foex.fi>
        Subject:        Another request

hello Mr. Teras,

I for got to include another request in my other email. I am also
looking for the historical FOEX prices for pulp. Can you please send
those to me too.

Thanks,
Monika Causholli


SK - I've printed this out & put in the folder w/ the others.  mm

Steve
 Attached is the accomplishments memo.  thanks john

	Maureen McVicker@ENRON
	12/22/2000 04:47 PM

		 To: Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lindolfo Ernesto
Paixao/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron,
Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Peter
Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: 2000 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Steve Kean would like each of you to send him a list of your accomplishments
for 2000.

If you have already provided the list to Steve, please disregard this email.

DUE DATE:  Close of business, Thurs., Jan. 4


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cuilla, Martin" <Martin.Cuilla@ENRON.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cuilla+2C+20Martin+22+20+3CMartin+2ECuilla+40ENRON+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Johnny Perches (E-mail); <@ENRON; mcuilla@houston.rr.com
Cc:	mcuilla@enron.com
Subject:

$20 from  pool
$62.50 from 250-125  game 1
$32.50 from 255-190  game 2
$67.50 from 250-115 game 3
$-30.00 from 260-200 game 4
-----------------------------------------
152.50


---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 10:47
AM ---------------------------
From: Anne C Koehler on 12/08/2000 10:42 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EMPLOYEE MATTERS AGREEMENT

Please review and provide me with your comments at your earliest
convenience.  We are trying to respond this afternoon.  Thanks

Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3839
713-853-3448
----- Forwarded by Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT on 12/08/2000 10:41 AM -----

	"KAREN MADDREY" <KMADDREY@LLGM.COM>
	12/07/2000 05:24 PM

		 To: <dkpenrod@aep.com>, <anne.c.koehler@enron.com>, <awills@velaw.com>,
<CHRIScollins@velaw.com>
		 cc: "DOUGLAS K. EYBERG" <Doug.Eyberg@LLGM.COM>, "DORIS RODRIGUEZ"
<DRODRIGU@LLGM.COM>, "MICHAEL WALLER" <MWALLER@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: EMPLOYEE MATTERS AGREEMENT

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by
return mail, e-mail or at 713-287-2017.  The unauthorized use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.

Karen Maddrey, Secretary
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 1400
Houston, TX 77002
713-287-2017
kmaddrey@llgm.com

 - Y7102!.doc


Sooner than January?  I'll let you know if I hear of anything.  I'm sure Mark H. is planning on you just integrating into ENA's legal group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rossi, Robbi
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:

Marie,

  I really think that EBS is closing up soon and that I better pound the pavement.  Let me know if you hear of anything!  Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Trevino, Susan
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:18 AM
To: faulkjb@texaco.com; Green, Michael; gregory.schockling@bhlp.com;
Hagelmann, Bjorn; hugh.connett@bhlp.com; maedajr@texaco.com; Mihalik,
Trevor; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); randall.curry@bhlp.com; Zisman, Stuart
Cc: Abel, Chris; Leuschen, Sam
Subject: Bridgeline DPRs for 4/12 and 4/15

Attached are the Bridgeline DPRs for April 12th and 15th.  Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Susan Trevino
x3-1462

 <<BridgeDPR0412.xls>> 	 <<BridgeDPR0415.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


are you going to ride in with us fri?  let me knwo.  we are going to leave at
12.  this is going to be a party weekend.  i am going to live on red bull.
give tim a shout at 853-4755.  i cannot make the game tomorrow night.  i will
be at the rest of them.


This deal from Tuesday was not entered in Enpower (HE 10).  We entered it
last night.  The Enpower numbers are attached.

DUKE to SOCO schedule for 1-30-01
Buy @ Duke E: 509197
Sale @ SOCO E: 509198


The report named: West VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=West+VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/17/2001>, published as of 10/17/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston
11/17/2000 04:43 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince
J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D
Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Ellen Su/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve
Jacobellis/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Trena McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kristin
Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, John A Cote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Shane
Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Aaron Armstrong/LON/ECT@ECT, Jurgen Hess/LON/ECT@ECT,
Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, J Christopher Champion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Roth/EU/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: URGENT- Election Update 11/17b

Everything the Gore campaign was hoping to hear from Judge Lewis this morning
they heard from the
Florida Supreme Court this afternoon. Voting 7-0 on its own motion, this very
activist court of all Democrats
ordered Secretary of State Harris not to certify the vote "until further
order of the court." This is a massive
victory for Gore (and more than even the Gore forces expected) and completely
reverses the devastating
body blow dealt by Lewis this morning. A hearing is scheduled for Monday at 2
pm on the issue of the
manual recounts.

What this means is the counting will go forward on a 24-hour basis in Palm
Beach and Broward counties.
 This also saps the Bush campaign of much of the positive PR momentum they
had built up as we
head into the weekend.

The justices set a hearing time Monday to begin hearing arguments for a final
ruling in the matter, but this
quick ruling on appeal is extremely favorable to Gore and should allow the
counties time to get real votes
tallied and leaked out to the public. Republican observers in the counties
have been doing their job and
objecting so strenuously to every possible problem that they have prevented
Palm Beach from finishing even
one precinct over the past two days. That has kept any numbers from leaking
to the public as of this writing.
But now the Democrats have until at least Monday to get some numbers out in
public.

The slow pace of the recount augurs poorly for a final resolution of the
election.  Dade County, Florida's most populous has just
announced that they will recount over 1 million ballots--which they say could
take up to a month.

We note that the NASDAQ is off 12 percent since election.  Prolonged
uncertainty is only bad news for the markets, as the world waits
for a sense of direction about US leadership on a range of issues from high
oil prices to the Mid-East peace process to
economic uncertainties in Argentina and in major currency markets.


Chris:

Are we already paying GE for the change order? Is GE pushing to have this
resolved? Pending input from Kay, I would like to hold off documenting it
until we deal with the contract assignment and ultimate disposition of the
unit.

Please follow up with Kay.

Thanks,

Ben

---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 11:43 AM
---------------------------

Renee Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/22/2001 12:19 PM
To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development
Subject: Blue Dog Change Order

Chris,

On behalf of Matt Tezyk, please find attached below the Blue Dog Change Order
for ENA's signature.  This had fallen through the cracks and Matt said that
you would be handling it for me.  Thank you very much.

Once ENA has signed off on two (2) originals of the Change Order, you may
return them to me at 3AC 712A.  I will then forward them to Jeffrey Darst for
his signature.  Copies of the fully executed change order will be distributed
upon return from GE.

Renee Alfaro
Phone: 713-646-7281
Fax: 713-646-6158
Email: ralfaro@enron.com


This is the preliminary results of "round 2" of testing the management
report.  I will give you the highlights tomorrow in our meeting.  (Stephen's
comments pretty much cover it).

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 09:16
AM ---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  08/28/2000 09:17 AM

To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Test Results of EOL Management Report

Let me know if you want us to go over this with you.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 09:15
AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen Simpson@ENRON on 08/25/2000 06:19 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Thibodeaux/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Parsons/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Test Results of EOL Management Report

Louise,

I have attached a draft of the newly revised report on our test results of
the EOL Management Report for your review.  Please keep in mind this is a
tentative draft.  Mark and Andrew still want to perform some QA on the
results and Torrey is still looking into some of the observations.

To summarize, we observed a significant improvement from the last test we
performed a few months ago.  The systemic problems that created a large
volume of the discrepancies in our previous testing have been greatly
reduced.  The majority of the discrepancies identified in the most recent
testing are primarily a result of random data entry errors and some deal
booking changes made in the back office without the Product Control Group's
knowledge.  Torrey has already corrected the most significant discrepancies
and is continuing to investigate the smaller items.

Andrew and I will both be on vacation for the week of August 28.  When we
return, we will set up a meeting with you and Dave to discuss the final
results once Torrey has had time to conclude his research.

Steve


FYI-waiting for direction.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 09:16 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	10/11/2000 09:03 AM

		 To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline LLC and Enron North America Corp.

We have been doing this here in Houston via a Unanimous Consent of the
Directors of the Company appointing the individual(s) as agents and
attorneys-in-fact.  Do you sugguest I proceed this way or via the Power of
Attorney below?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Cindy Buckley
	10/11/2000 06:44 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline LLC and Enron North America Corp.

Hi Mark and Tana

I have been given your name by Justin Boyd as someone who can help me or
point me in the right direction.

We need to raise a power of attorney to enable Amita Gosalia of Enron House
to execute EnronOnline Password Applications for each of the above company.
Please could you let me know if you can prepare such a document and also what
if any additional information you require.  I have attached a copy of the
Power of Attorney which we use in the UK for such authority for your
information.

Unfortunately this is becoming quite urgent and any assistance you can give
will be greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you have any queries.

Thanks and regards


Take a look and let me know if it serves your needs.

Eric Benson@ENRON on 03/14/2001 03:45:41 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monthly Report

Paul - I've saved the monthly report in a format you should be able to get
but if for any reason it doesn't work please give me a call; thanks; the
report is due by the 19th and needs to have the current projects and status;
let me know if you need anything else - Eric


Jennifer:  it will be done soon!


Daily Market Commentary October 26, 2001

WEAK FINISH TO NOVEMBER SEEN . . .

 Natural gas futures worked higher in active options related trading Friday  on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices opened higher and marched higher in mostly uninterrupted fashion and managed to close at the high end of the day's trading. Short term traders see efforts to push the November contract lower on Monday's expiration. . .

 At the close of trading, the November contract added $.103 to $3.041 per MMBtu. The December gained $.080 to $3.183 per MMBtu. . .

 "I believe that traders are looking for a weak finish to the November contract on Monday. There are indications that they want to crush the November contract," said a New York floor trader. . .

 "Many of the local traders are short and took short positions home with
them over the weekend," he said.

For the most complete information available subscribe to GasTrader at http://gastrader.net

Bill Burson
120 Summit Blvd.
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Tel (303) 761-7470 * Fax (303) 761-8662
(To be removed from this list send email to burson@gastrader.net)


Do you still expect Guinn to call Ken?  If so, do we have updated talking
points (and background) for Ken?


Joya' F. Davis
Sr. Admin. Assistant
ENA Legal Department
EB3855A
joya.davis@enron.com
(713) 853-9559 DID
(713) 646-4842 FAX


BOARD CAFE
The Newsletter Exclusively for Members of Nonprofit Boards of
Directors
Short enough to read over a cup of caffe latte, the Board Cafe
offers a menu of ideas, opinion, news, and resources to help
board members give and get the most out of board service. Co-
published by CompassPoint Nonprofit Services and BoardSource
(formerly National Center for Nonprofit Boards). Chef / Writer:
Jan Masaoka. November/December 2001. Vol. 5 No.10.  Ready-to-
print version at: http://www.boardcafe.org.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Once I was on a board and was so unhappy with the new executive
director that I decided to resign from the board.  I called the
Board President to tell her I was leaving, and to my complete
surprise, she said that nearly the whole board felt the same way.
Since there had never been any disagreements or sharp words at
any of the board meetings, I had assumed that everyone ELSE on
the board was happy with the executive director.  The Board
President had telephoned a few of the board members who had left
before their terms were up, and she had been surprised to hear
their dissatisfaction with the executive director.  That prompted
her to call other board members who had the same sense.  A few
months later, the executive director was fired, and she
subsequently sued the organization for wrongful termination (the
suit was settled at a low amount).
This story links two of the topics for this month's Board Cafe:
exit interviews for board members, and "What Every Board Needs to
Do About Insurance."  Also an item on a terrific new book, and
here's a link to Planet 501c3's "Meeting-Shortening Maneuvers":
http://search.compasspoint.org/publications/~planet/cartoon_page.
lasso?id=34.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
EXIT INTERVIEWS FOR BOARD MEMBERS
What does it mean when board members leave?  Corporations
routinely hold exit interviews with departing employees and
tabulate the reasons for the departures.  If there seem to be
silent and/or disgruntled board members leaving the board, a
series of short telephone exit interviews might reveal important
reasons why.  Ask a former board chair, consultant, or another
neutral person to do the interviews.  In many cases, departing
board members reveal that they have left due to disagreements
with the executive director or the board chair, or are disturbed
about the overall direction of the organization.
PRACTICAL WAYS TO REACH PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
Does your organization want practical, real-life advice on
reaching people with disabilities?  A GREAT book,  Access Aware:
Extending Your Reach to People With Disabilities, is now
available from the Alliance for Technology Access with points on
language (Say "She uses a wheelchair" rather than "She's confined
to a wheelchair"), facilities ("Use the closed fist test for
handles-to ensure that people with limited use of his or her
hands can open the door") and more.  One of the board's jobs is
to ensure that the organization's services are accessible to
everyone . . . this straightforward resource will be helpful both
to the board and to staff. Go to
http://www.ATAccess.org/resources/acaw/acawinterest.html or call
800.455.7970.  $45 for a printed manual and $20 for the PDF
version (both include online access).
 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Now for this month's "Main Course" at the Board Cafe:
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO ABOUT INSURANCE
By Melanie Herman, Nonprofit Risk Management Center
Not every nonprofit needs every type of insurance.  But every
nonprofit board should consider its insurance needs and the
resources needed to protect the good health and mission of the
organization. We offer 8 tips on insurance issues to get you
started.
1. Examine exposures first. Rather than start with looking at the
current insurance policies, begin by looking at how your
nonprofit is exposed to possible lawsuits and losses. While
lawsuits against nonprofits are relatively uncommon, the most
common types of suits against nonprofit boards are ones that
allege wrongful employment practices (such as wrongful
termination), sexual harassment, or retaliation.  Which of your
activities are more likely to lead to lawsuits, damage to
reputation, finances or property?
2.  Make sure your organization is working with an expert it can
trust. An insurance agent, broker or consultant can provide
valuable advice and practical help on coverage for your
nonprofit. Seek someone experienced with nonprofits, and familiar
with the work you do (or committed to learning about it). Your
advisor should live up to the promises he or she makes, give
prompt and credible answers to your questions, take the time to
understand your organization and seem genuinely interested in
helping you. To avoid awkward situations, and to prevent a
potentially dangerous conflict of interest, choose someone
unaffiliated with your nonprofit.
3.  Have an annual report to the board on insurance and risk. If
you don't have a board Insurance or Risk Management Committee, be
sure that insurance review is assigned to another committee, such
as the Finance Committee or to an individual board member.
Though insurance policy language can be hard to swallow, and even
harder to understand, it's important that someone from the staff
or board read the policy from beginning to end, including the
policy exclusions, endorsements and definitions.
4.  Read the laws.  Ask the Risk Management or Finance Committee
to look at the language in your state volunteer protection laws
as well as the federal Volunteer Protection Acts.  Remember that
none of these laws provides absolute protection against suits
alleging wrongdoing on the part of nonprofit board members.  For
more information about the federal Volunteer Protection Act, see
http://www.eriskcenter.org/docs/protection.cfm.  State laws
differ and some states do a better job than others of informing
the public; find the link to your state's laws at
http://www.eriskcenter.org/docs/s_state.shtml.
5.  Reduce risk as well as buy insurance. Just as car insurance
isn't a reason to drive recklessly, nonprofit insurance is only
one element in risk management.  The board should consider
conducting a risk management audit, or simply identifying ways to
reduce risk.  There may be simple ways to increase building
safety, to improve personnel policies, strengthen compliance with
personnel policies, improve performance evaluations, or to screen
staff and volunteers more thoroughly.
6.  Talk over the various types of insurance and do what you can,
when you can. No single insurance policy covers all exposures and
some are more important than others, depending on an
organization's circumstances. For some, a property policy
covering buildings and personal property against accidental loss
is most important. In another organization, a policy providing
protection for volunteer injuries may be of first import. If you
can't afford all of the coverages you'd like your nonprofit to
have, start with the policy you consider most important and add
others when you can.
7.  Consider Directors & Officers (D&O) liability insurance.
While many suits against nonprofits are brought against the
nonprofit corporation as well as individual managers and board
members, in a few cases suits are brought solely against board
members themselves.  Many small nonprofits don't buy D&O
insurance simply because they can't afford it.  In other cases,
the board may decide that the risk of a lawsuit is too unlikely,
or that there may be other ways to finance defending the board
and the organization.  Whether or not you have D&O insurance,
there are board practices that reduce the likelihood of a suit,
such as preventing conflicts of interest, recording "no" votes in
the minutes, and ensuring that the organization's employment
policies are consistently applied.  For more about D&O insurance,
see http://www.genie.org and click on "Insurance" in the FAQ
section.
8.  Test the market. Every three to five years consider
"shopping" your insurance program. Invite several brokers or
agents to submit proposals, or ask the broker to obtain bids from
several insurance carriers. Doing so will give the board a basis
for comparison and a sense about whether you're paying a fair
price.  At the end of 2001, experts are predicting that insurance
will become more difficult to buy, premiums will become more
expensive and new exclusions and restrictions are likely to
appear.  This might be a good time to consider changing to a
different carrier or to review your overall insurance program.
Related Board Cafe article: Sample Conflict of Interest Policy
(January 2000) http://www.boardcafe.org/bc2000_01.html.
The Nonprofit Risk Management Center provides FREE technical
assistance to nonprofits via telephone or e-mail. For more
information on any of the topics covered in this article, visit
http://www.nonprofitrisk.org or call 202.785.3891.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
You are reading the BOARD CAFE, published monthly by CompassPoint
Nonprofit Services and BoardSource (formerly the National Center
for Nonprofit Boards).  CompassPoint: 706 Mission Street, 5th
Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103; (phone) 415.541.9000; (fax)
415.541.7708; San Jose office: 1922 The Alameda, San Jose, 95126;
(phone) 408-248-9505.  (e-mail) boardcafe@compasspoint.org
(website)  http://www.compasspoint.org.  BoardSource: 1828 L
Street NW, Ste. 900 , Washington, D.C. 202.452.6262 website
http://www.ncnb.org  We welcome your comments and contributions
to the BOARD CAFE.
If you would like your own free fax subscription to the BOARD
CAFE, contact the Board Cafe at any of the numbers listed above.
If you would like to have the BOARD CAFE delivered to you free
via electronic mail, send an blank e-mail message to
boardcafe-on@lists.compasspoint.org.  To unsubscribe to the
BOARD CAFE send a blank email to
boardcafe-off@lists.compasspoint.org, or fax your
request to 415.541.7708. The Board Cafe's e-mail/fax list is not
rented, exchanged, or given to any other entity.
(c) 2001 CompassPoint Nonprofit Services/BoardSource (formerly
National Center for Nonprofit Boards)

**This list is powered by npo-mail.org, offering high-quality mail and list service to the nonprofit community.


Hi Rosalee:
Attached is a summary of the proposal that ENA filed today in response to the
RFP for power and gas issued by California's DWR.  Also attached is a copy of
the complete proposal.  Steve Kean asked that I forward it along to you.
Could you please print out a copy and forward it along to Ken Lay prior to
his departure for Washington D.C.?  Thanks very much.

All the best,
Jeff


Purchase
Deal #157288

It appears that the price on PGEV should be Index less $.06 not Index less
$.05 for the redelivery.
Let me know which is correct per the exchange agreement.

Thanks-
K


Kathy -

What p&l reports did you receive in the past?  We have never changed a p&l
down here 3 months after the fact,  so I am surprised that would take place
at all.  I would think that if there were any entry so far in the past that
it would need to be done by accounting.  I'm not sure what you want done
about this.  FYI...We have tied out to the dollar with the DPR.

Kathy Reeves
01/11/2001 03:40 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canada p&l

Jeff,
I just wanted to let you know that I do not think that the p&l reported for
Canada in the management reports was correct for 2000.  The correct p&L for
Canada by trader is as attached.

I believe that problem stems from Q1 origination adjustment which never made
it to Executive reports.
I will forward the Email I sent originally regarding this issue.  I believe
it was dealt with correctly at the time based on the p&l summaries I used to
receive but it is no longer correct based on what Robin has sent me.

Kathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT on 01/11/2001 02:33
PM ---------------------------

Robin Rodrigue
01/11/2001 01:29 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canada p&l

Kathy,

The 2000 DPR is closed.  Therefore no more changes can be made.  As I stated
in my earlier email, either the 4.1 million adjustment was never actually
made to the DPR or it is included in our number because the trading and
origination p&l that I am reporting ties with what the DPR is reporting.

Robin

Kathy Reeves
01/10/2001 04:57 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canada p&l

Robin,
$4.1 M was to have been reduced from our Q1 trading income to break out the
origination correctly.  It looks like this was never done in your report.  I
thought it had been based on previous Emails.  I don't think the p&l in your
report is correct as it is $4.1M too high.  This is what our trading income
at Dec 31 should be.  Note:  the DPR was never adjusted because the LTD and
YTD numbers do not exclude orgination income.  It also looks like the break
out by trader is not quite right

Kathy

Robin Rodrigue
12/08/2000 10:58 AM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canada p&l

Kathy,

I am attaching a copy of the NGPL that was reported as of this morning.  If
you look at the by Trader P&L, we are off from your spreadsheet by
approximately $3.6 million USD for December and approximately $7.6million
year to date.  The $7.6 consists of the December variance and the $4 million
variance that we discussed earlier (originations).  However, I spoke with the
Chris Able from the Controls group, what we are reporting for originations
and for Canadian p&l ties to the DPR.   This leads me to believe that either
our number already includes the origination adjustment or the origination
adjustment was never made to the DPR.  To help resolve the December variance,
I have added a tab to your file to show what we have reported each day for
December.

Remember the p&l we are reporting by trader excludes originations.  Give me a
call when you have time and we can try to resolve these variances.

Thanks,
Robin

Kathy Reeves
12/07/2000 06:46 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canada p&l

Robin
I would like to make sure before year end that the p&l being reporting for
Canada ( trading profits only) equals what I think it is as per attached:

Would you let me know what you are currently reporting for Canada.

Thanks
Kathy


I thought we already discussed this yesterday.  They are in my EPE presched sheet as several different deal.  Do you need more clarification?

lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:15 PM
To:	Gang, Lisa
Cc:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	Losses at Kyrene - 5/31

Lisa -
I'm trying to figure out why two deals entered to cover losses at Kyrene for the 31st of May didn't make it into the preschedule sheet. I'm looking for the following deals:

627022 - STSW buys EPE
	 PV
	 HLH - 2 MW @ $0
	 comments: Losses at Kyrene

627025 - STSW buys EPE
	 PV
	 HLH - 76 MW @ $170
	 comments: Delivery at Kyrene

These deals are pulling into the CARP report, but are not shown in either the preschedule or Real Time El Paso models. Therefore, Enpower is showing more volume and a higher total cost for the day than our model. Can you give me a hint on this one?

Thanks,
Kate


Attached is a note on UI Standard Offer service by EPMI.

Please send comments to Sandi McCubbin.

I faxed the original to 916-448-0816.


Sheila:  Here's the status

(1)  Goldman Sachs - I received comments on May 22, 2001.  Ball is in my
court.

(2)  MSDW - I faxed comments to Joseph A. Marovich on May 2, 2001.  Fax No.
was 212/762-9502.  No response.

(3)  Salomon Smith Barney - I faxed comments to Tania Meyer Wilson on May 2,
2001.  Fax No. was 312/648-3328.  No response.

Please let me know about (2) and (3).  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Jane, Southwest Gas shorted ENA  $16,386.19 for liquidated damages they claim
occurred in November (see email below).  I have not received the support from
SWG but have asked them to fax me a copy.  How would you like me to handle?

Laurie
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 09:44
AM ---------------------------

"Nancy Frazier" <Nancy.Frazier@groupwise.swgas.com> on 01/03/2001 09:13:03 AM
To: <Laurie.Ellis@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: 1/2/01 Payment

Enron incurred $16,386.19 in Liquidated Damages for the month of November.  I
mailed a copy of them to your attention on 12/26.  Most of the fallouts were
due to CPR and PRR which means Enron failed to perform their obligation to
supply gas.  Nancy


yes 212-224-7032

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 2:42 PM
To: DJunek@aeglobalmarkets.com
Cc: lamoss@duke-energy.com
Subject: Tetco

My girlfriend (and I have many of those) at Tetco told me to tell you to
call Aurora at 713-627-5316.

Do you have your own phone yet??


[IMAGE]   Dear Valued Member:  Content blocks revolutionize Energy Central Direct.  You choose important energy information most relevant to your needs.  From utility stock prices to Dow Jones 4 Corners Electricity Index to upcoming seminars and trade shows, new content blocks keep you on top of what's most valuable to you.  Customize your content blocks today with just a click.   Click here to customize your ECD    [IMAGE]       This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.  If you wish to discontinue  receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


Sue: Could you use your contacts with Edelman to get on the phone with Scott,
Mark and Karen to jump start this thing?

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/21/2001 08:26 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "ryang@enron.com"
<ryang@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com"
<vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Direct Access

The direct access coalition had a conference call today to discuss
strategy.

The Chamber, Retailers and the Manufacturers met with the Governor's
office and Senator Burton to discuss DA.  The Retailers and the
Manufacturers came away somewhat disenchanted.  There was little support
for DA, especially from Senator Burton, and the Governor's office was
unfocused.  The Chamber wasn't as pessimistic as the others because the
Governor's office was focused on other things and did not necessarily
shoot down DA.

As requested, I urged the group to utilize Edelman Public Relations who
is under contract to AREM.  The group as whole was very supportive.
There was some reluctance for fear of upsetting Senator Bowen and
Governor Davis.  Several members of the coalition, including the
Manufacturers, Retailers, Grocers and myself,  dismissed those fears and
took the tact that the time is now and we have little to lose given
recent statements by legislators and the administration.  Aaron Thomas
with AES agreed to contact AREM and Edelman to develop a strategy but I
think a call from Enron directly to AREM would be beneficial to speed
the process up.

The group is going to meet with DWR and continue their individual
lobbying efforts.  Their intent is to address the bonding and net short
fears raised by finance and DWR.  Enron had discussed hiring bond
counsel.  Has this occurred, and if so, should attend the DWR meeting?

The group is also going to meet with TURN to try and address their
core/non-core issues, if possible in order to try and get them on board
with the coalition proposal.


Sorry I didn't get back to you.  We were on the go all weekend.  Two
engagement parties for Susan's brother and my 29th birthday on top of that.
I'm available after work anytime this week besides tonight.

PS...my parents got me the same racket as you got for christmas.  It should
be ready for domination this weekend.