Dear 1-800-FLOWERS.COM Customer,

There's still time to send one of our exquisite floral arrangements to let
family and friends know you're thinking of them.  Don't wait to order - your
heartfelt holiday gift will be there to celebrate Thanksgiving - even if you
can't
be!http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/emwwth/17/0/0/1/0/0
Our breathtaking Autumn Celebration Centerpiece, a Thanksgiving favorite, is
a wonderful way to accent a loved one's special feast.  Order this elegant
centerpiece
today!http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/product.pl/emwwa/1401Visit us
today at www.1800flowers.com, or find us at AOL keyword: flowers.
Our door is always open to help you find just the right gift for all of your
occasions!http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/enterstore.pl/emwwthAll the
Best,

Your friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COM

You received this email because you are a 1-800-FLOWERS.COM customer. If you
would no longer like to receive these emails, please send an email to
1800Flowers@shop2u.com and indicate that you would prefer not to receive
further emails from us about our products. Please do not reply to this
message.1800Flowers@shop2u.comThe 1-800-FLOWERS.COM privacy policy is
available online
athttp://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/security/index.asp#privacyFor questions
about an order, please email us at custservice@1800flowers.com*Exclusive of
applicable service, shipping, handling, and relay charges and
taxes. Offer may vary and is subject to availability, delivery rules and
items. Void where prohibited. (c)2000 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

[IMAGE]


Most of you are probably aware in the past crude and products mid-market deals were worked thru the ENA	Gas Mid Market group under Fred Lagrasta and Craig Breslau.  For the past 3 months we've been in the process of transitioning the final accounts from ENA over to EGM Mid-Marketing under Bill Berkeland.  Going forward it will be extremely helpful for everyone to focus on this business in EGM.  If you get any requests to price deals for crude, products, pet-chems or plastics from ENA please refer the contact to either Bill Berkeland or myself BEFORE providing any prices.  It's important to EGM's business plan and earnings targets that these transactions are managed by and credited to EGM.  Thanks for everyone's support.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Berkeland, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Lagrasta, Fred
Cc:	Nowlan Jr., John L.; Maffett, Randal
Subject:	FEDNAV

Fred, is there any good reason why Craig & co are working FEDNAV (a Canadian Shipping co.) as opposed to referring them to my group? I,m getting word thru our london desk that Craig did a deal with them a few weeks ago and may be working another one thru Chris Figueroa today. As we go down the path here, we need to get your guys referring products customers to us as we have been referring gas guys to your shop. Through the years of your group's marketing efforts, there are quite a few prospects out there that have contact info pointing to your group and we need to be able to count on you to point them to us. The customer transition issues that we are working don't just apply to the named few we are talking about, but also to new contacts as well.

Thanks.

Bill Berkeland
Enron Global Markets L.L.C.
Bill.Berkeland@enron.com
(713) 853-7004


Headline:   "Oil and Gas IT Investment Remains High, But More Operationally
Focused, Concludes an Industry Survey to Be Presented at Interactive Energy
Conference, Dec. 5"

HOUSTON, TEXAS, November 14, 2001 - After a period of widespread
shoot-at-anything-that-moves investment policy that followed the ERP, Y2K,
and e-business boom, oil and gas firms remain aggressive investors in
information technology (IT), but their selections are much more focused on
tangible results, according to the recent findings of researchers at Booz
Allen Hamilton and Zeus Development Corporation. The two firms have joined
in a research project to interview information officers at many of the
world's leading energy firms to understand how they are currently managing
IT investment.  A final report will be presented at Interactive Energy,
Wednesday, Dec. 5.

"Management are scrutinizing their IT investment opportunities more closely
to ensure they return short to medium-term positive cash flow," reports Bob
Nimocks, president of Zeus.   "For this reason, they're also very interested
in finding ways to extend current investments in ERP, e-procurement, data
warehouses and other recent applications."

The researchers have found that investment policies vary widely from sector
to sector.  In the oilfield services and exploration and production sector,
IT management have maintained or increased their capital budgets from last
year, continuing to look for technologies that can lead to large reserve
additions or improvements in production.

"The impression is that there is still a lot to be gained from such
technologies as reservoir imaging, data integration, knowledge management
and inter-organizational collaboration," Nimocks said.  "The integrated
majors continue to spend significant resources in these areas."

Downstream refining and petrochemical management, on the other hand, have no
choice but to cut their IT budgets in the face of very tight operating
margins.  "Anything more than a year, we don't even bother asking," said an
IT director at a large petrochemical processor.  "We're at the bottom of our
business cycle - at least I hope we are.  Out capital expenditure budgets
are down about 15% this year compared to last, and last year was down about
15% from the previous."

With deregulation, gas and power competitors are in the midst of one of the
most profound changes to their industry since its inception.  Management are
very interested in technology to improve their competitiveness within
wholesale and retail markets. However, the Enron financial crisis seems to
have spooked the industry for the time being.

Researchers are finding differences cut across organizational sizes as well.
Smaller and mid-market firms have cut more quickly in reaction to downturns
in market conditions.  Larger firms remain more committed to long-term
plans.  Many larger firms have changed their governance systems to ensure
investments are made with direct benefits.

"A year ago we didn't have to worry about costs," reported one information
officer of a mid-sized independent with upstream and chemicals operations.
"Now we do."  She explained data warehousing remains a high priority for
both business units, but other new initiatives, such as wireless
implementations, have been reduced to small pilot studies.

About the Survey
	Delegates of Interactive Energy will receive the full report of Booz
Allen Hamilton and Zeus Development Corporation's survey of information
technology (IT) development in the energy sector, including a review of the
applications where energy management are currently investing.  Staff are
working to interview energy-company information officers (CIOs) as well as
representatives from supplier firms and public sector organizations around
the world to determine priorities in IT development, changes in the levels
of capital spending, key trends, and innovations in governance.
The results will be presented during a special presentation at the
conference on December 5th.  Interviewees who participated in the survey are
invited to attend the session to discuss the conclusions and meet other
participants.

About Interactive Energy
Interactive Energy will be held at Houston's George R. Brown Convention
Center, Dec. 4-7.  The annual conference and exhibition covers information
technology (IT) advancements in the energy industry and features numerous
case studies of technology implementations, new software demonstrations,
business plans and special workshops.  Conference Sponsors of Interactive
Energy 2001 already include Enermetrix (www.enermetrix.com) SAIC
(www.saic.com), AT&T (www.att.com), Microsoft Corporation
(www.microsoft.com), Luminant Worldwide (www.luminant.com), Unisys
(www.unisys.com), Conchango (www.conchango.com), Proclarity
(www.proclarity.com), Silicon Energy (www.siliconenergy.com), Avocent
(www.pixelvision.com), Documentum (www.documentum.com), Appropria
(www.appropria.com) and Oracle (www.oracle.com).  Supporters include PR
Newswire, Energy Central, TIPRO, Techxans and the Houston Business Journal.

About Zeus Development Corporation:
Celebrating its tenth year of incorporation, Zeus Development Corporation is
a privately owned research consultancy offering strategic and business
development information through reports, monthly periodicals, databases,
consulting services and conferences to the energy industry in the areas of
information technology and downstream natural gas development.  For more
information, contact Ms. Whitney Casso, 832-200-3718 or
wcasso@zeusdevelopment.com <mailto:wcasso@zeusdevelopment.com>.
Greg.Whalley@enron.com


As you have heard, Dynegy is terminating the merger agreement today.  Among other things, this means we are now free to pursue other alternatives - which we are actively doing.  As a consequence of uncertainty about the deal - and now Dynegy's announcement - Enron's debt was downgraded to below investment grade levels today by S&P, Moody's and Fitch.

In response to this action, we have initiated a plan to protect value in our core trading and other energy businesses.  At the same time, we are nearing the completion of the business review process announced last week.  Once this process is complete, we will be conducting a comprehensive restructuring of our business.  Regrettably, but unavoidably, this will include the sale of non-core assets and the implementation of a comprehensive cost saving plan, including layoffs.

We are taking these actions to focus our resources on preserving the value of our core businesses, retaining our employees who are key to our future success, and maintaining relationships with our trading counterparties.  This must be our priority to establish a more solid footing for the rest of Enron.

I know you have serious concerns about what this all means for you.  Although, there are no guarantees, you should know that we are still in this fight and remain absolutely committed to protecting the value of the ongoing businesses of Enron.  All I can ask is that we all be supportive of each other, stay focused on our work as best we can, and stick together while we work to overcome these latest challenges.

Even six or so weeks ago, none of us could have imagined that we would be where we are today.  We will not recover in six weeks what we have lost, but we will work to stabilize and then rebuild this great company.  As always, I appreciate the extraordinary contributions each of you make.  Thank you.

Ken


Craig,

Did you ever follow up with Kim Ward and the desk on the contract language
for the deal or deals you did with CA endusers?  We need to make certian that
the customers are signed to the correct contract for balancing, etc.  Please
get with me to discuss.

Mike Grigsby


The report named: West VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=West+VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/19/2001>, published as of 10/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


Jon,

Grateful if you could complete the picture for me and for Mark Taylor.    Is
MG London Inc. the entity that is the Clearing Member of NYMEX + a Futures
Commission Merchant and Commodity Trading Advisor?   Do any other (MG)
entities have similar registrations, and if so, what are these?

Thanks

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 31/07/2000 20:47
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 28/07/2000 16:44 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG

Justin:

Do you know whether we have acquired any companies with CFTC registrations of
any kind (e.g. Commodity Trading Advisor or Futures Commission Merchant)?  I
was wondering who was responsible for compliance matters if we have.

I hope you're well and all my best to Fran.

Mark


Cara et all,

	Following list of bug fixes are moving out to stage to address the recently reported issues:

	New versions of both applications have been moved out to stage..

PreSchedule Workspace:
#1
Problem:
Uploading to the Path Confirm Area:*accepted Mid C-1:53   Rockies-0:22    Palo 1:11  COB 0:49 (Row 69 Generated a General SQL error message)
This is showing Physical and non-physical right.

Solution:
Line 69 , the timezone value under column G was '6/20/2001-6/20/2001' when it should have been 'PDT' or any other valid timezone value.

#2
Problem:
Running Build Route Report:
	Criteria Selection-unable to select criteria for build route, got "List index out of bounds (4)" error *needs fix

Solution:
Fixed.. was losing track of which workspace was open

#3
Problem:
Daily Summary Function
*needs fix or workaround-Would not work at all, got 3 error messages. " Unable to locate" "can't find last row!", and "Failed to export summary!" this is going to create a csv file right to the AGG sched vol report now according to Mr. Poston, I am thrilled to hear it.

Solution:
Executive Report was just pushed to stage yesterday, the data is currently what we're focusing on with this release and will soon start shaping it to make it visualy look like the pre-existing excel-based Executive Report.

#4
Problem:
Error Checking - took 1:29, produced a line by line error sheet that is printable, *accepted
	BUT routing errors for lines 19-223 in the COB sheet produced a routing error that just states "ERROR:" no reason.  We need to know why an error is shown(was 	run after all routes were deleted) *needs fix

Solution:
Error Checking will not spit out any errors if there aren't any.

Path Confirmation:

#1
Problem:
One little housekeeping thing,  can we move the delete button away from the confirm button?  Perhaps on the other side of the exit button?  This will save us mucho headaches later. OR make the dialog box look more like a warning that a record has been selected for deletion?

Solution:
Dialog box included for deletion alert confirmation purposes and button repositioned.

thanks
Asem
x31700

PreSchedule Workspace:

Running Build Route Report:
	Criteria Selection-unable to select criteria for build route, got "List index out of bounds (4)" error *needs fix

Error Checking - took 1:29, produced a line by line error sheet that is printable, *accepted
	BUT routing errors for lines 19-223 in the COB sheet produced a routing error that just states "ERROR:" no reason.  We need to know why an error is shown(was 	run after all routes were deleted) *needs fix

Uploading to the Path Confirm Area:*accepted Mid C-1:53   Rockies-0:22    Palo 1:11  COB 0:49 (Row 69 Generated a General SQL error message)
This is showing Physical and non-physical right.

Daily Summary Function
*needs fix or workaround-Would not work at all, got 3 error messages. " Unable to locate" "can't find last row!", and "Failed to export summary!" this is going to create a csv file right to the AGG sched vol report now according to Mr. Poston, I am thrilled to hear it.

Routing
Mid C-13:27   Rockies-2:23   Palo 7:56  COB 5:12 the time is fine.

**needs fix**The routes are still not showing designated Physical or Non-Physical Properly. All are coming through as Non-Physical.  This is must be fixed prior to release for production as our WSCC fee pulls directly from this data in deal Scheduling.

Path Confirmation:

Speed is very much an issue here,  I had Mark Guzman sit with me while I cut a path and when I confirmed a group of paths. The confirmation of 5 paths as a group took 70 seconds from the time I entered the name and hit the "ok" button until the confriming was completed. This is too long, we need this to be 20-30 seconds max. Currently, this process takes about 10 seconds in lotus. Confriming 2 paths with the 20th fully populated took 1:39.

Cutting a path went fast enough until I closed the screen to go back to the confirmation report. This also took over a minute.  This is another 10 second process in lotus.

One little housekeeping thing,  can we move the delete button away from the confirm button?  Perhaps on the other side of the exit button?  This will save us mucho headaches later. OR make the dialog box look more like a warning that a record has been selected for deletion?

All of the sorting looks great, the paths are represented properly, we are very very close!

Real Time Discussion:

Where are we on this?  I heard initial rumblings, but nothing lately.

Here are the sheets that I have used to create data for 6/20

 << File: COB_JUNE20_USEME.psc >>  << File: Mid_C_June20.psc >>  << File: Palo_June20.psc >>  << File: Rockies_June_20.psc >>

I can do more testing or Net meeting stuff tomorrow until about 10:30, but after that I have to be a scheduler for a couple of hours.

Thanks,

Cara


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lucci, Paul T.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:

Please look these over to see if these are all the fixed price financial deals Sinclair has with us.

Thanks
Paul

 << File: Sinclair Recon.xls >>


Bill:  As we discussed on the phone, we need to pull together the technical
information for the 4 LM 6000 machines to be installed in the LVC 2 project.

I am attaching the most current draft of the the "breakout contract" for your
review.  The final draft is scheduled to come out in the next few days.

I am also attaching a copy of the "summary of terms" I prepared to
distribution to the bidders.  GE has provided input on this summary as to
site-adjusted performance specifications.

Please look over these documents, review the attachments to the existing
GE/West LB contract, and determine what the appropriate technical information
should be.  We should be able to pull a lot of the information from the
attachments to the West LB contract.

I will call in from San Francisco on Monday to talk about how we can most
efficiently do this.  Please feel free to call me on my cell phone (503)
803-1700 to discuss.

Thanks.

[See 11/03 drafts forwarded a few minutes ago for the current form of
breakout contract]


Attached is a summary of the New York RTO Order issued by FERC late
yesterday. I apologize for the length, but I wanted to include a number of
quotes from the Order that repeat arguments that we have been making over the
past few years. In a procedural Order issued today, FERC has scheduled the
Northeast mediation process to begin next Thursday, July 19th.


With the extension of the PRC to all organizations, questions have arisen
about the results of this process. This memo provides some details about the
PRC process.

First some context:  The key to Enron,s success is the increasing quality and
dedication of our talent.  As we continue to attract and retain the very best
people, we all have continued to raise the performance bar throughout the
organization.  At the core of our system are the following principles:

? Hire the best people.
? Provide challenging opportunities.
? Pay well ( and pay for performance (with bonuses based on merit, not
entitlement).
? Evaluate performance through a rigorous review process.
? Provide clear feedback and direction to employees.

The PRC is a critical component of our performance management system.  The
PRC is built on this foundation:

? 360 degree performance feedback.
? Review by a broad group, not just the supervisor.
? A relative ranking of performance across Enron to determine promotions and
to allocate bonus money.

In addition to understanding this broad philosophy, we all need to understand
the following details:

? Relative ranking.  Enron uses the descriptors &superior8, &excellent8,
&strong8, "satisfactory", &needs improvement8, and &issues8 to group all
employees.  This year, &relative to his/her peers8 precedes each of these
descriptors. This qualifier confirms what we have done and will continue to
do in practice; that is, evaluate individual performers against their peers.
It is possible, therefore, for someone to perform at the same or higher level
compared to prior periods, yet receive a lower rating for the current period
if other employees, performance raised the bar.
? Teamwork.  A relative ranking may invite the view that for one employee to
gain, others must suffer.  However, feedback is explicitly solicited on
teamwork when evaluating each individual,s performance.  Anyone who attempts
to gain by withholding information or refusing to collaborate with others in
the organization will suffer in a relative ranking on this key performance
criterion.
? Preferred distribution. In large part, the quality of our workforce has
been driven by our willingness to make tough decisions. We have consistently
captured business opportunities and overcome obstacles because we have made
the choices that had to be made in order to constantly improve our employee
talent base. The preferred distribution (5% superior, 30% excellent, 30%
strong, 20% satisfactory, and 15% needs improvement or issues) forces PRC
committee members to identify those who must improve in order to remain at
Enron as well as to single out top talent for special recognition. There is
some flexibility in the system, but every organization must ultimately face
this difficult question: have we achieved the highest level of performance or
are there still improvements that must be made? Few, if any, organizations
adhere exactly to the preferred distribution. Rather, they exercise informed
discretion in the individual categories and meet a distribution that reflects
their groups, overall effectiveness and need for improvement.
? Communicating Ratings. Everyone rated &satisfactory8 or below should know
his/her rating. Each organization has determined for itself whether to
communicate ratings of &strong8 and above.  In all cases, employees will
receive feedback about their performance against expectations, areas of
success, and areas that need improvement.

We hope this answers most of your questions about the PRC process.  We would
like your feedback and ideas on how to improve the PRC process going
forward.  Therefore, we will be conducting an eSpeak in the near future, and
there will be other methods we will create to let us know what you think.  In
the meantime, please feel free to consult with your HR Generalist if you have
any immediate questions, comments, or concerns.


you do not need to read all of the articles below, but you asked about how
much coal trade we do.  One article suggests 4-5 trades a day, and another
indicates that the ARA (Amsterdam/Rotterdam/Antwerp) contract has traded 1.25
million tonnes, in 5,000 tonne lots, which my math says is 250 trades as of
the date of the articles (EnronOnline, so it is the sum of both buys and
sells).   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 20/10/2000
12:09 ---------------------------

Katy Lomax
17/10/2000 10:15
To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Kearney/LON/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Riaz Rizvi/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace
Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Samuel Grossman/LON/ECT@ECT, John Moran/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez
Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth McCarthy/LON/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Cochran/LON/ECT@ECT, Katrina Bensadon/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Press Cutting - Coal

Please find attached the following article/s:

"Europe catches fire" - FT Energy Online

"e-ventures flood coal market" - FT Energy Online

Kind Regards,
Katy Lomax


3850, through the wooden doors.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mark Dobler                           07/28/2000 12:11 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Kay -

I've included a note on the biration in P1.  If it looks good to you, can you
please print on ENA letterhead?

I'll be over on 29 for a 1:30.  Where are you located?  I can drop by to sign
at that time.

MSD


I would path the April deal just like we did the previous deals, 102122 and
102121.


Vince, thanks for your very prompt email response. I passed your message
along to Dave.

Thanks also for a great dinner and day of meetings last week. I really
enjoyed the chance to learn more about Enron, and was very impressed with
everyone I met.

Look forward to working with you these next few months!!

Cheers,
Vincent

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 2:39 PM
To: chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: Enron Cover Letter & Resume for Dave Gershenson

Vincent,

I have forwarded the resume to our Analysts / Associate pool with
a recommendation to accept David as a summer intern.

I expressed interest in taking him into my group. He may, of course,
work for a different unit of Enron. It's up to him and I shall not be
offended
if he would like to go into trading or deal origination.

Vince


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
05/08/2000 03:22 PM
To: duffie@stanford.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin
Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Storage Analysis Model audit

Professor Darrel Duffie
450 Miramonte Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94306

         May 8, 2000

Dear Professor Duffie,

I enclosed with this e-mail Enron Storage Analysis  Model (SAM) for your
review.  The attached files include:
 1) a brief documentation of the model (SAM.doc), 2) c-code of the main
routines, 3) Excel spreadsheet interface,
4) SAM_audit.dll .

Dr. Vince Kaminski, Dr. Stinson Gibner and myself have spent about one year
in developing this model.
With traders, feedback incorporated, the model results are close to reality.
Although there are features to be included,
we believe the model is ready for your review.  We look forward to your
comments and suggestions.

Please feel free to contact me should you need additional detail.

Sincerely,

Zimin Lu

Director, Enron Research
Zlu@enron.com
713-853-6388

Enclosures


You might want to attend this meeting if you can.  We did some brainstorming
today on what / how a Commodity Logic payment module should be and came up
with some options that are quite revolutionary.  It entails some risk, but
also has revenue potential as well.  We want to run it by both you and Tom to
see if this is a direction you want to head.

If you're not available, then I can spend time with you to give you the
overview.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------
From: Maria Sandoval on 11/22/2000 01:27 PM
To: Kristin Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda Flores-Cuellar/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Payment Module Mtg. on 11/28

The above mentioned meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, November 28th
from 9 - 10 a.m. in EB 21c1.

If I have access to your calendar, this has already been added.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at ext. 35586.

Thank you.


Steve, I noticed that our allocation from 2000 to 2001 is going up by 21%
year on year (ie) $13.9M from $11.5M.  We have been able to keep ENA's direct
group expenses flat year on year, we are trying hard to keep the corporate
allocation flat year to year as well.  Do you have a view on how we might be
able to achieve this goal?

Regards
Delainey


Tana,

Will you send me the latest GTC's for bandwidth?

Thanks!


Here are the prepared comments to be passed out at the FERC conference
tomorrow morning.  Mary and Jeff, please review the comments and let Dan know
if you have any comments (202) 828-5851.  Anyone else, if you're around and
can review the comments and get back to Dan within the next 1/2 hour or so,
please feel free to do so.

Thanks

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 06:10 PM -----

	"Susan Buchheit" <sbuchheit@bracepatt.com>
	11/08/2000 06:06 PM

		 To: <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kean Document

** High Priority **

 - 0133819.01


I fixed it.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           10/05/2000 03:28 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Duke Cashout Entries 5/00 and 6/00

I am having trouble pulling in the demand charge for 6/00 on deal 157278 for
$1,129.09.  The only thing that is different from May is that the demand
volume is 0.  I think it needs to be a 1 for the charge to come through.
Please take a look.

Thanks,
Megan


--------------------------------------------------

Telecommunications Reports presents....

TR DAILY
January 12, 2001
--------------------------------------------------

PLEASE NOTE:  This electronic publication is copyrighted by
Telecommunications Reports International. Redistribution or
retransmission of any part of this electronic publication -- either
internally or externally -- is strictly prohibited. Violation will
be cause for immediate termination of your subscription and
liability for damages.  You may print out one hard copy for your
personal use. If you are interested in having this publication sent
to colleagues at your company, additional authorized recipients may
be added to your subscription for a fee. Call Subscriber Services
at (800) 822-6338, or send an e-mail to info@tr.com for more
details.  If you prefer not to receive TR Daily, please reply to
customerservice@tr.com.

****See Monday's TR for an On the Record interview with Benjamin H.
Dickens and John A. Prendergast of the Washington law firm of
Blooston, Mordkofsky, Dickens, Duffy & Prendergast.  They'll
discuss opportunities for paging carriers to compete in the alarm
monitoring industry.****

Table of Contents
Click here for the full issue:
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/index.htm

COMMISSIONERS SPLIT ON CONDITIONS
IMPOSED ON AOL-TIME WARNER MERGER
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201.htm

KENNARD SUBMITS RESIGNATION, PLANS
TO LEAVE FCC POST FOR THINK TANK
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-01.htm

FCC TRANSITION TEAM LEANS HEAVILY
ON COMMON CARRIER REPRESENTATIVES
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-02.htm

FCC WON'T PREEMPT MISSOURI BAN ON CITY-OWNED TELECOM UTILITIES
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-03.htm

ALCATEL TO BUILD TRANSATLANTIC NETWORK FOR C&W
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-04.htm

TAUZIN CALLS HEARING ON ICANN's DOMAIN NAME PROCESS
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-05.htm

FCC AFFIRMS LIFTING OF 700 MHz TRANSMITTER POWER LIMITS
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-06.htm

AT&T WILL BOOST STAKE IN EXCITE AT HOME
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-07.htm

NEWS IN BRIEF
http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2001/td011201/Td011201-08.htm

***************************************************************

COMMISSIONERS SPLIT ON CONDITIONS
IMPOSED ON AOL-TIME WARNER MERGER

One of the FCC's last major actions during the tenure of Chairman
William E. Kennard marks the agency's first effort to oversee
Internet "instant messaging" services.  The move last night came as
the FCC announced its long-awaited decision to clear the merger of
America Online, Inc., and Time Warner, Inc.

All five Commissioners voted to approve the merger-related
application, but the majority's vote to attach conditions as
competitive safeguards prompted sharp criticism from the person
widely expected to succeed Mr. Kennard.

Commissioner Michael K. Powell warned that the FCC was taking a
"substantial leap" by declaring broad jurisdiction over the
Internet.  And Commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth reiterated his
strong view that the FCC lacks authority to extract conditions
through its public interest reviews of merger-related license
transfers.

The FCC's merger conditions mandate that the combined company--
known as AOL Time Warner, Inc.--allow all customers to choose
Internet service from any unaffiliated ISP that has a contract with
the merged company to use its cable TV facilities.  Customers must
be able to have their chosen ISPs provide their "first screen" when
they go online, without going through an AOL Time Warner-affiliated
ISP as an intermediary.

The merged company must allow unaffiliated ISPs to have direct
billing relationships with its subscribers.  And it may not
discriminate in favor of its affiliated ISP in terms of caching
services, customer technical support, multicasting capabilities,
address management, or other technical functions.

The FCC also indicated its concern that, without conditions, AOL
Time Warner would be able to leverage its dominance in text-based
instant messaging (IM) into the nontext-based IM market.  As a
condition of the merger approval, therefore, the FCC prohibited AOL
Time Warner from offering any new advanced, IM-based high-speed
service (AIHS), feature, or enhancement that includes one- or two-
way streaming video communications using a "names and presence
directory" (NPD).

The prohibition could be lifted, however, if AOL Time Warner demon-
strated that it had complied with certain safeguards.

Commissioner Powell said the majority had "given in too much to
their collective imaginations" in imposing the IM conditions.  In
a separate statement, he said he was unwilling to join them in mak-
ing the "substantial leap" to find that the FCC "has jurisdiction
to regulate virtually every Internet product."

Neither the record nor anticompetitive theory supports mandating IM
interoperability, Mr. Powell said.  "No competent antitrust
authority, to my mind, would conclude intervention was necessary,
nor do I believe such an analysis would withstand judicial review,"
he said.

During a press briefing this morning, Mr. Kennard insisted that the
IM conditions were "very narrowly tailored and minimally
intrusive."  Although he wouldn't speak directly to Mr. Powell's
criticism, the chairman said, "At the end of the day, I felt--and
my two other colleagues felt--that in order to protect consumers we
had to impose some conditions."  For more details, see Monday's TR.

***************************************************************
KENNARD SUBMITS RESIGNATION, PLANS
TO LEAVE FCC POST FOR THINK TANK

FCC Chairman William E. Kennard has submitted his resignation to
the White House, effective Jan. 19, and will take a temporary
senior fellow position at the Aspen Institute, a think tank in
Washington.

Ending a three-year term as the nation's top telecommunications
regulator, Mr. Kennard made his resignation public during a press
conference this morning to discuss the FCC's approval of the merger
America Online, Inc.-Time Warner, Inc. merger (see story above).
At the Aspen Institute, Mr. Kennard will be advisory board chairman
of the Communications and Society Program.

Although his term on the Commission does not expire until the end
of June, Mr. Kennard said, "Our work is complete, and it's time for
me to go."

Most industry observers predict that President-elect George W. Bush
will appoint FCC Commissioner Michael K. Powell chairman.  In one
scenario some see as likely, President Bush could nominate Texas
Public Utility Commission Chairman Patrick H. Wood III to be an FCC
commissioner to succeed Mr. Kennard.  After Mr. Wood had been con-
firmed and dealt with federal communications industry issues for a
while, he could be named chairman of the agency, leaving Mr. Powell
free to accept another appointment, possibly in the Justice Depart-
ment, these sources say.

Mr. Kennard has been FCC chairman since 1997; he was the
Commission's general counsel from 1993-1997.  Previously, he was a
partner at the law firm of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson &
Hand and counsel to the agency's reigns as interim chairman.

***************************************************************
FCC TRANSITION TEAM LEANS HEAVILY
ON COMMON CARRIER REPRESENTATIVES

President-elect George W. Bush has begun rounding out the
"transition advisory team" that will work with the incoming
administration on critical FCC issues, including the selection of
a new chairman.  Earlier this week a handful of telecom policy
advocates were added to the FCC team, which in its current form is
top-heavy with common carrier service interests, observers note.

Overall, the FCC group had 31 members as of late today, including
the five advisers named to the team in late December (TR, Jan. 8).
The entire FCC advisory team is listed on the Bush-Cheney
transition team's Web site:
http://www.bushcheneytransition.com/media/pdfs/teams.pdf.  More
names could be added later, says an industry source.

Four FCC team members have been plucked from the Bell operating
companies.  The lone competitive local exchange carrier
representative is Royce Holland, chairman and chief executive
officer of Texas-based Allegiance Telecom, Inc.

The new FCC transition team advisers from the Bell companies are
William P. Barr, Verizon Communications, Inc.'s executive vice
president and general counsel, who also is on the Justice
Department's transition team; Timothy McKone, VP-congressional
relations for SBC Communications, Inc.; Daniel Mattoon, VP-congres-
sional affairs at BellSouth Corp.; and Thomas J. Tauke, Verizon's
senior VP-external affairs and public policy.

Numerous trade association officials have been added to the FCC
advisory lineup, too.  They include Information Technology Industry
Council President Rhett Dawson; Information Technology Association
of America VP and Counsel Mark Uncapher; Jay Kitchen, president and
CEO of the Personal Communication Industry Association; and Peggy
Binzel, executive VP of the National Cable Television Association.

The wireless industry has three representatives.  They are Richard
Barth, VP and director-telecom strategy and regulation at Motorola,
Inc.'s Washington office; PCIA's Mr. Kitchen; and David Gross of
Vodafone Group plc.

FCC transition advisers who hail from the Washington "think tank"
community are J. Gregory Sidak of the American Enterprise
Institute; the Cato Institute's Adam Thierer; and Progress and
Freedom Foundation fellows Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Randolph J. May.

***************************************************************
FCC WON'T PREEMPT MISSOURI BAN ON CITY-OWNED TELECOM UTILITIES

The FCC today said it wouldn't preempt a Missouri state law that
effectively forbids city-owned utilities from providing telecom
services.  The Show-Me State cities had tried to distinguish their
request from that of Texas cities that had asked in vain for FCC
preemption of a similar law several years ago.

In the Texas case the FCC refused to a preempt a state law barring
cities from offering telecom services directly.  The Missouri
cities argued that their situation was different because they
wished to offer telecom services through municipal utility
companies.

But the FCC said that in general, such utilities are a part of the
state itself and, therefore, don't fall under provisions in section
253 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 barring states
from preventing an entity from entering a telecommunications
service market.

If a municipal utility has an "independent corporate identity"
that's separate from the state, however, it may be eligible for
protection under those "barrier-to-entry" provisions, found in sec-
tion 253 of the Act, the FCC said.  The Missouri utility company
didn't show that they had such an independent identity, it added.

In statements released with the decision, FCC Chairman William E.
Kennard and Commissioners Gloria Tristani and Susan Ness said the
utility companies represented a "promising class" of competitors.
They asked Congress to amend the language in that section to
"address clearly municipally-owned entities."

Ms. Ness also suggested that states adopt "less restrictive
measures" such as separation or nondiscrimination requirements to
prevent city-owned utilities from having "unfair competitive ad-
vantages" over private-sector service providers.

***************************************************************
ALCATEL TO BUILD TRANSATLANTIC NETWORK FOR C&W

Alcatel SA said it will build a transatlantic telecommunications
network for Cable & Wireless plc of London, which will use the new
undersea cable system in anticipation of data traffic growth
between Europe and North Atlantic.  The Apollo network project,
which Alcatel said is worth "several hundred million U.S. dollars,"
will be designed to handle high-speed data transmissions and will
be "adaptive to future traffic patterns."

A Yankee Group analyst expressed confidence that Alcatel will
complete the project by the promised delivery target of summer
2002, and cited Alcatel's proven track record in deploying top-
notch submarine networks.  Nancee Ruzicka, a long-haul telecom
infrastructure analyst, also said that C&W's projections for
transatlantic data-traffic growth likely will prove accurate.

Ms. Ruzicka told TR she believes data capacity on the network,
which will handle 3.2 terabit-per-second speeds, will be exhausted
in a short period of time.  Continued growth in the deployment of
VPN (virtual private network) and Internet protocol systems will
contribute to escalating demand, she said. "The demand is starting
to show up," she said.  "I think that capacity will get used up
pretty quickly."

Alcatel said the Apollo network will be built using DWDM (dense-
wavelength division multiplexing) technology.  Apollo will have
four fiber pairs equipped with 80 wavelengths at 10 gigabits per
second, "the highest capacity and lowest unit cost of any
transatlantic system," Alcatel said.  The project includes an
additional four-year marine maintenance contract.  Alcatel will
devote two cable-vessels for cable fault and marine repair
services.

***************************************************************
TAUZIN CALLS HEARING ON ICANN's DOMAIN NAME PROCESS

The House Energy and Commerce Committee's telecommunications
subcommittee plans to hold a hearing in February to examine the
process by which the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers (ICANN) selects Internet domain name suffixes, Commerce
Chairman W.J. (Billy) Tauzin (R., La.) announced today.

"There have been a number of reports that ICANN's process to create
a new generation of Internet domain name suffixes may be thwarting
competition in the registration and assignment of Internet domain
names," Rep. Tauzin said in a letter that was sent today to ICANN
President and Chief Executive Officer Michael M. Roberts.

"As the committee of jurisdiction over the issue, the committee
wants to ensure that this process is open and fair, and most
important, successfully sparks competition," Rep. Tauzin added.

***************************************************************
AT&T WILL BOOST STAKE IN EXCITE AT HOME

AT&T Corp. will boost its stake in Excite@Home after two partners,
Comcast Corp. and Cox Communications, Inc., decided to trade $2.9
billion worth of Excite@Home shares for AT&T shares.  Comcast and
Cox were given the right to exchange their shares in an agreement
announced last year (TR, April 3, 2000).  AT&T said the exchange
would increase its voting interest in Excite@Home to 79% from 74%.
Its economic interest would increase to 38% from 23%.

The March agreement also allows Comcast and Cox to end their
exclusive relationship with Excite@Home and invite other cable
modem service providers onto their systems as early as December
2001.  If they do that, however, Comcast and Cox will forfeit
warrants that give them the right to purchase Excite@Home stock at
favorable prices.

***************************************************************
FCC AFFIRMS LIFTING OF 700 MHz TRANSMITTER POWER LIMITS

The FCC has affirmed its decision to permit base station
transmitters to operate in both the lower and upper commercial 700
megahertz bands, which are scheduled to be auctioned, beginning
March 6.

Last year, the Commission removed power limits that some companies
had said prevented the deployment of base stations using time-
division duplex (TDD) or other single-channel technologies in the
upper 700 MHz band (TR, June 26 and July 10, 2000).  Motorola,
Inc., filed a petition for reconsideration or clarification of that
decision (TR, Aug. 21 and Sept. 25, 2000).

In a second memorandum opinion and order released today in Wireless
Telecommunications docket 99-168, the Commission said its rule
changes "allow for the broadest possible use of this spectrum,
consistent with sound spectrum management, and will expand
participation in the auction and increase the potential for new
technologies and new services."

***************************************************************
NEWS IN BRIEF

Commerce Secretary Norman Y. Mineta will join information
technology industry executives Tuesday, Jan. 16, to announce the
opening of a new Information Technology Information Sharing and
Analysis Center.  The announcement is scheduled for 11:30 a.m. at
the Department of Commerce in Washington.  Mr. Mineta will step
down as Commerce secretary later this month and has been tapped by
President-elect George W. Bush to become Secretary of
Transportation in the new administration....

Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson (R.), another Bush administration
cabinet choice (to be Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services), announced that John H. Farrow has asked not to be
reappointed to the Wisconsin Public Service Commission when his
term expires March 1.  Mr. Farrow intends to return to his faculty
position at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), where he
taught for 10 years before his appointment to the PSC in 1998....

AOL Time Warner, Inc., today named board members for the newly
merged company.  They are Daniel F. Akerson, chairman and chief
executive officer, XO Communications, Inc.; James L. Barksdale,
partner, the Barksdale Group; Stephen F. Bollenbach, president and
CEO, Hilton Hotels Corp.; Stephen M. Case, chairman AOL Time
Warner; Frank J. Caufield, partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield &
Byers; Miles R. Gilburne, partner, CGLS Fund; Carla A. Hills,
chairman and CEO, Hills and Co.; Gerald M. Levin, CEO, AOL Time
Warner; Reuben Mark, chairman and CEO, Colgate-Palmolive Co.;
Michael A. Miles, former chairman and CEO, Philip Morris Companies,
Inc.; Kenneth J. Novak, vice chairman, AOL Time Warner;  Richard D.
Parsons, co-chief operating officer, AOL Time Warner; Franklin D.
Raines, chairman and CEO, Fannie Mae; R.E. Turner, vice chairman
and senior adviser, AOL Time Warner; and Francis T. Vincent Jr.,
chairman Vincent Enterprises....

Ten members of the Washington law firm of Greenberg Traurig have
left to join Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld's telecom and
information technology practice in McLean, Va., an Akin Gump
spokesman said.  Eric Cowan, Richard Rubin, and Marjorie Connor
were named partners; Glynna Parde and Joseph Triano were named
counsel; and Roger Cepeda, Brad Haque, Alex Konde, Jeffrey Neuman,
and Fadi Samman were named associates....

The FCC is seeking additional comments on whether and how it should
adopt a proposal by the Rural Task Force for revising the federal
universal service mechanism used by rural local exchange carriers.
It applauded the plan as "a good foundation," but in a further
rulemaking notice released today in Common Carrier docket 96-45, it
asked for suggestions about how the plan should be implemented.
The FCC zeroed in on issues that the federal-state joint board on
universal service had flagged for further public comment, including
the proposed "safety net" and safety valve" provisions (TR, Dec
25).  It also sought input on the RTF's reccommendation to fix per-
line support in competitive study areas.  Comments are due 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register.  Replies are due 15 days
thereafter....

Venezuela concluded an auction of a second block of wireless local
loop (WLL) licenses today, collecting $9.9 million for five
licenses.  Genesis Telecom SA won four of the licenses with $5.6
million in bids, while BellSouth Corp.'s Telcel CA unit won one
license with a bid of $4.3 million.  Bidding on a third block of
licenses is scheduled to begin Monday, Jan. 15.  Bidding on the
first block of licenses ended last month and raised $16.3 million
(TR, Dec. 18).  In that block, Telcel won the rights to four
licenses for $5.8 million, while Netsat Telecommunications SL of
Spain won the fifth license for $10.5 million....

Net bids in the FCC's ongoing reauction of 422 "C" and "F" block
PCS (personal communications service) licenses reached $15.2
billion by the end of bidding today.  After round 51, Verizon Wire-
less still led, with $6.2 billion in bids.  It was followed by
Salmon PCS LLC--partly owned by Cingular Wireless LLC--which
offered $3.0 billion.  Alaska Native Wireless LLC, which is partly
owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., was third with bids of $2.6
billion.  Activity continued to drop in the sale; only 32 new high
bids were offered in the 51st round.  Thirty-nine bidders remained
eligible....

Crown Castle International Corp. intends to raise $315 million
through the sale of 12 million shares of common stock.  Crown
Castle, a Houston-based provider of antenna towers and other
wireless infrastructure, will use the funds for acquisitions and
general corporate purposes.  The sale is scheduled later this
month....

Tritel PCS, Inc., will attempt to raise $250 million through the
private sale of subordinated notes.  The sale is contingent on
Tritel, a subsidiary of TeleCorp PCS, Inc., receiving permission
from its current noteholders for a subordinated offering.  If
Tritel doesn't get permission, the company said it would proceed
with an offering of unsecured notes.  Tritel, which offers PCS
(personal communications service) under the AT&T brand name,
intends to use the funds for, among other things, the purchase of
PCS licenses....

Similar-sounding PCS operator Triton PCS, Inc., also is seeking to
sell $250 million worth of subordinated notes to private investors
to raise funds for capital expenditures.  Triton, of Berwyn, Pa.,
offers PCS (personal communications service) under the AT&T brand
name.

********************************************************
TR DAILY Copyright 2001 Telecommunications Reports International,
Inc., (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted weekdays, except for
holidays.  Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.tr.com.
Published by the Business & Finance Group of CCH INCORPORATED.

Editor: George E. Brandon
Associate Editor: Steve Peacock
Editor in Chief: Victoria A. Mason
Publisher: Stephen P. Munro
1333 H Street, NW, 1st Floor-East Tower, Washington, DC 20005
Editorial information: Telephone:  (202) 312-6100
Fax:  (202) 842-3047
Email: gbrandon@tr.com

Customer Service:      Telephone:  (202) 312-6050
(877) 874-8737
Fax:  (202) 842-3023
Email: customerservice@tr.com

Federal copyright law prohibits duplication or reproduction in
any form, including electronic, without permission of the
publisher.:


FYI
For any of you whose 2001 Plan includes any components under Controllable
Infrastructure, the information below explains these items in more detail.
Should you have further questions after reviewing this, please do not
hesitate to contact me at X30669.

Thanks,
Edie
  ----- Forwarded by Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 05:45 PM -----

	David Vandor@ENRON
	02/06/2001 03:44 PM

		 To: Paula Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lindsay
Long/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sarah Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Controllable Infrastructure

Controllable Infrastructure will be billed for 2001 as follows:

Long Distance -  Will be billed to cost centers directly on account 52502000
and will consist of actual charges for long distance from your phone, calling
cards, and calls to the 1-800-97-ENRON number.

Market Data - Will also be billed to cost centers directly on account
52502000 and will consist of actual charges for market data obtained through
the providers (Bloomberg, Reuters, etc)

WAN Links -  Wide-Area Network links are used to connect remote offices to
the Houston network.  These charges will be billed on actuals and directly to
the cost center.

Trading Turrets -  Special Phones used by the traders.  This will be billed
on plan.

The following items are part of infrastructure, but the costs are driven by
system development projects.  These items will be billed according to plan,
which was derived from analyzing your expected system development costs.  As
the year progresses we will examine your system development charges to
determine if the portion of the infrastructure charges you are receiving
should be adjusted.

Application Integration -  Whenever a new client level or web-based
application is employed or an existing system is upgraded the application
integration team ensures this system is compatible with other systems and
will not cause system failures or downtime.

Change Management -  This group works with the development teams to provide
scheduling and contingency plans for bringing new systems online and for
maintenance on existing systems.  This includes scheduling downtimes and
providing the expected impact on the company.

Architecture and Planning - The primary function of the Architecture group is
to provide overall design and integration of technologies and products for
Enron's network.  This includes ensuring server space for scalability and
security is in place for the network.

If you have any other questions, please let me know.

David


Mike,

We discussed United Way last Thursday when you were on the 32nd floor
monitoring the hurricane.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roberts, Mike A.
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Marquez, Jose; Moore, Kevin G.; Stevens, Adam; Bennett, Steve; Smith, William; Wooddy, Sarah; Pernoud, Christopher
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: United Way

Y'all,

I think we didn't get the word on this somehow!

In a lot of ways, percent participation is just as or even more important than magnitude.

Please check out the hyperlink below in Vince's email to me so we can show research solidarity!.

Thanks.

- Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:33 PM
To:	Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni; Tamarchenko, Tanya; Roberts, Mike A.; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Lu, Zimin; Kohli, Sandeep
Subject:	FW: United Way

Please, try to mobilize the members of the group
who have not made a contribution yet. Research is shown
as a separate group in all the reports and we may stand out as unit
at the end of this week.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thode, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Neale, Nelson
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	United Way

As of this morning, EWS Research has $19,355 in pledges from 13 out of 47 employees.  The final 34, who have not accessed the system, are:

	Stephen Bennett		Rakesh Bharati
	Shirley Crenshaw		Lance Cunningham
	Chuanli Deng			Amitava Dhar
	Anita Dupont			Youyi Feng
	Shane Green			Anguel Grigorov
	Thomas Halliburton		Paulo Issler
	Seksan Kiatsupaibul		Sandeep Kohli
	Jaesoo Lew			Martin Lin
	Zimin Lu			Jose Marquez
	Praveen Mellacheruvu		Kevin Moore
	Mitra Mujica			Wichai Narongwanich
	Christopher Pernoud		Maureen Raymond
	Michael Roberts			Osman Sezgen
	Wiliam Smith			Adam Stevens
	Sofya Tamarchenko		Leann Walton
	Sarah Wooddy			Sevil Yaman
	Roman Zadorozhny		Oren Zimmerman

In order to access the system, all they need to do is click on https://hrglobal.enron.com/.  They will need their GIS ID and password.  If they don't know what their ID and password are, have them go to https://ehronline.enron.com, click the "Accept" button, and then click on "Forgot your User ID or Password?"

Keep in mind that they are counted as having participated whether they contribute or not, as long as they access the system and indicate their preference.  However, I would encourage them to contribute something.

Thanks.

Eric


A little humor for your Tuesday morning..... LATE

>
> > >
> > >A guy walks into a bar with an octopus. He sits the octopus down on a
> > >stool and tells everyone in the bar that this is a very talented
> octopus.
> > >
> > >He can play any musical instrument in the world.
> > >He hears everyone in the crowd laughing at him, calling him an idiot,
> etc.
> > >so he says
> > >that he will wager $50 to anyone who has an instrument that the octopus
> > >can't play.
> > >
> > >A guy walks up to the bar with a guitar and sits it beside the octopus.
> > >The octopus picks up the guitar and starts playing better than Jimmy
> > >Hendrix, just rippin' it
> > >up.
> > >So the man pays his $50.00
> > >
> > >Another guy walks up with a trumpet. The octopus plays the trumpet
> > >better than Dizzie Gillespie.
> > >
> > >So the man pays his $50.00
> > >
> > >A Scotsman named Stuart walks up to the bar with a set of bagpipes. He
> > >sits them down beside the octopus. The octopus fumbles with it for a
> while
> > >and
> > >sits it down with a confused look on his face.
> > >
> > >"Ha!" the Stuart says. "Ye canna' play it, can ye?"
> > >
> > >The octopus looks up at the Scotsman and says, "Play it? I'm going to
> > >fuck it as soon as I can figure how to get its pajamas off"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >


Start Date: 1/22/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012219.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Please find attached NDA for distribution to your customer.

	Peter Feltman/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/12/2001 09:44 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Bilateral NDA - Africa One

Tana:

Please use standard language.

Thanks,

Peter Feltman

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Feltman, Peter
Subject: Re: Bilateral NDA - Africa One

What is the nature of your project or discussions?  Will our standard
language..."information in connection with a possible transaction or other
business relationship..." suffice?

	Peter Feltman/ENRON@enronXgate 02/12/2001 09:31 AM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mathis
Conner/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Bilateral NDA - Africa One

Tana:

Please prepare a bilateral NDA for the following company:

Africa ONE Ltd.
14 Oak Street
Needham, Massachusetts 02492

Patricia Bagnell
President
T: 781-455-8603
X: 781-444-2591
E-Mail: bagnell@africaone.com

Once completed, please e-mail the NDA so I may forward it to Africa ONE.

Please call me at X54482 if you need to discuss further.

Thank you,

Peter Feltman


With the Holiday Season and a New Year upon us, I would like to take this
opportunity to thank each of you for the contributions you,ve made this year
to the success of Enron Transportation Services Company and Enron.  Your hard
work and dedication continue to add value across the Enron organization.

I hope that you and your family have a Happy Holiday and a safe New Year.


Gerald:
Charlie Otto heard that you were the person looking reviewing and approving processing agreements since Dan Hvyl has departed.  Please let me know if this is incorrect.  Attached is an agreement that Charlie would like to have you review and approve before he sends to the customer.  Please contact him with any questions at x35518.

Thanks,

Becky Young
x30622


Sara,

I don't think we ever touched base on the issues surrounding the credit
worksheet.  Please let me know if we still need to talk.  Thanks.


"Bill Ennis" <bennis@txoga.org> on 03/12/2001 04:56:08 PM
To: <kenneth.lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Legislative Digest #8

Attached for your review is Legislative Digest #8.  It has been delayed
reaching you due to technical difficulties.

 - Digest8.doc


<http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/ia_banner02.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	 <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://www.thestructuregroup.com>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Strategic_Planning.asp>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/details.asp?ProductID=909>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

November 21, 2001

Enron Continues to Implode;
Will the Dynegy Deal Proceed?

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[News item from Reuters] Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) shares fell sharply in opening trade on Nov. 20 after the humbled energy giant warned it could be forced to pay by next week $690 million in debt triggered by a credit downgrade last week. The shares were down $1.16, or 12.8 percent, to just over $7.00 in early morning trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock was the biggest loser by percentage change and the second-most active stock on the NYSE. As of early morning trading on Nov. 21, Enron shares were priced at $4.85, reportedly their lowest level in nearly 10 years.

Analysis: To paraphrase Shakespeare, "Oh, what a tangled web they weave when first they attempt to?" Wait, I better stop. When speaking about Enron, I am not prepared to finish that sentence, at least at this point. Enron has been accused of a lot of things over the last few weeks, but at this juncture an ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigation has yet to reach any conclusion regarding deceptive financial reporting on the part of the Houston trader. Enron itself has admitted that its financial records from 1997 through the first half of 2001 "should not be relied upon." Nevertheless, perception is reality and the perception currently in the industry is that Enron is now taking a fall after getting caught following years of skirting the truth. While negative perception continues to cause damage to Enron's stock, perhaps of more current interest are the developments that are more grounded in reality. We know Enron has just lowered its third-quarter earnings, faces a stiff payment of $690 million (due within a week, in fact) and has cast doubt over its 4Q earnings potential. The question of the hour is whether these new financial hits will represent a "material adverse change" in the eyes of Dynegy, which still aims to buy Enron but wisely included an exit clause in its purchase contract. The other question is, what happens to Enron if Dynegy leaves it standing at the altar? A terminated marriage agreement would surely cause further reductions to Enron's already-weak credit standing, and it is unknown how the company could recover from another blow to its reputation.

As has been the case since the first of October, the ongoing "fall of Enron" story is changing by the day. For background on Dynegy's proposed acquisition of Enron, and Enron's financial problems that precipitated the proposal, please see my 11/12/01 IssueAlert (available at www.scientech.com/rci <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/article.asp?id=987>). In the interest of time, let me summarize what is happening at this moment. Dynegy rode in as Enron's white knight and plopped down a $9-billion offer ($10 a share) to buy the company, which at the time represented a steal of a price considering that Enron was priced at almost $90 a share little more than a year ago. To some extent, this seemed like the final chapter in the Enron saga. In other words, the company had gone through a tumultuous year, hit its "rock bottom" but still planned to live happily ever after as part of Dynegy, Inc., its much-smaller rival.

The developments just this week amount to a screeching brake that may in fact interrupt the nuptials between the two companies. For starters, on Monday (Nov. 19), Enron submitted its 10-Q report to the SEC (which was five days late, by the way). In the report, Enron dropped what have turned out to be several bombshells. First, Enron disclosed that, due to recent downgrades of its credit rating by agencies such as Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch, it has to pay off or refinance by Nov. 26 debt it owes to a third party with which it has a partnership, or face nearly $4 billion in additional payments. Enron also has the option of finding new collateral to guarantee the debt. Enron would not disclose who owns the note, but we know that the limited partnership includes holdings in C.E.G. Rio, a Brazilian natural gas-company that Enron had planned to sell to raise about $250 million in cash. Note that just last week, various credit services lowered Enron's senior unsecured debt to one notch above junk status and warned that further downgrades may occur, which apparently prompted the call for the debt payment. Reportedly, if Enron does not make the $690-million payment by Nov. 27, investors will gain the right to immediately begin liquidating the asset for an amount equal to the note payable. Enron is presently scrambling to establish a "mutually acceptable" amendment with lenders to avoid having to issue payment on the debt. Along with the acknowledgement of the imminent payment of $690 million, Enron said that any further drop in its credit rating might necessitate further payments of $3.9 billion to other partnerships, the bulk of that figure going to Osprey Trust and Marlin Water Trust.

Also in the new SEC filing, Enron increased its 3Q 2001 loss by 3 cents a share to 87 cents. Enron originally reported a 3Q loss of $618 million, but has now raised that figure to $664 million. As a minor bright side, Enron did increase reported earnings for the first nine months of 2001 by a penny to 20 cents a share, attributed to adjustments made after the quarter's end. However, looking forward, Enron warned that continuing credit worries and a decline in the value of some of its assets could take a further toll on fourth-quarter earnings. Enron also claims that, even still, the numbers contained in the 10-Q report are not necessarily final as they have not been reviewed by Arthur Andersen, the company's external auditor. Thus, further revision of the numbers could take place.

Interestingly, there does not seem to be a big question about whether or not Enron can pay the $690-million debt obligation. Enron apparently has secured an additional $2 billion in loans from J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup in the last week. In fact, within the current SEC filing, Enron says that is has $1.2 billion of domestic cash consisting of the lines of credit and net collections. Thus, some investors are reassured by the belief that Enron has the cash on hand to make the $690-million payment if it is unable to renegotiate terms with lenders. According to the SEC filing, Enron also intends to sell off $8 billion in non-core businesses that are performing "below acceptable rates" and would use the proceeds to pay off debts, although this money would probably not be immediately available.

Again, however, there is a perception element to this development that should be noted. Enron has been accused of financing partnerships in the past in such a way as to keep them off the company's balance sheets. Apparently, this non-disclosure was done so that Enron could grow quickly without adding too much debt to its own books or diluting the value of its stock. As has been well documented, Enron is already in the midst of an intense SEC investigation regarding potential conflict-of-issues involving its former CFO. News about other financial deals that may not have been fully disclosed is clearly making investors even more nervous about Enron's stock.

As I said, the question of the hour is whether or not Enron's new problems will cause Dynegy to reconsider its offer. As usual, the answer all depends on who you ask. Dynegy is remaining mum and referring all questions about Enron's financial status to Enron. Investors are rather mixed on the question. Some say that the facts disclosed in the 10-Q report do not dramatically change Enron's position from what it was when Dynegy launched its acquisition and that the current drop in Enron's stock is just a knee-jerk response to the media hype surrounding the story. Further, those who diminish any potential impact say that Enron is still a liquid company and has money coming in from various sources. Thus, it should have no trouble making the $690-million payment. From a broad perspective, so one theory goes, Dynegy is still getting a great deal in Enron due to its staggering drop in stock price, and the acquisition remains valuable to Dynegy as it will position the combined company as North America's biggest marketer and trader of natural gas and electricity.

In contrast, other investors point to the fact that since the purchase agreement was signed, Enron's stock has fallen an additional 32.5 percent, which weakens the original acquisition agreement. In addition, if Enron follows through with the $690-million payment next week or secures additional financing to front this cost, both options alter the company's financial position from when Dynegy made its original offer, which could be construed as a "material adverse change."

Another interesting development indicates that Enron may no longer be the company that Dynegy agreed to purchase. New reports indicate many energy trading companies are now unwilling to sell power or natural gas to Enron for fear about the company's credit concerns. Such companies are now particularly reticent to sell power to Enron for next-day delivery. What this means in practical terms is that other trading companies may be gaining Enron's market share, which could diminish the value in the trading market that had attracted Dynegy to Enron in the first place. In addition, Enron's once-stellar energy trading business could now become reduced or collapse altogether.

Questions have been raised why Dynegy is not doing more at this time to help Enron out of its financial mess. Of course, under the acquisition agreement Dynegy already committed to providing an immediate $1.5-billion asset-backed equity infusion into Enron to help the company with its current financial woes, which will be followed by an additional infusion of $2.5 billion into the combined company by ChevronTexaco, which owns 27 percent of Dynegy. However, some traders apparently have wondered why Dynegy has not done anything about Enron's diminishing ability to secure power on the open market. Traders claim that Dynegy could step in and buy power from sellers on the behalf of Enron, in a strategy known as "sleeving." The fact that Dynegy has not chosen to take this step has been an indication to some observers that it is only willing to go so far in its pursuit of Enron.

In addition, Enron shareholders launched a lawsuit on Nov. 12 in state court in Houston to prevent the merger with Dynegy from happening. The petition reportedly alleges that Enron directors breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell the company at too low a price and without adequate consideration of other alternatives. Enron said it will defend its decision in court.

Moreover, Dynegy was smart to include an exit clause in the acquisition agreement. The clause reportedly allows Dynegy to walk away from Enron if any material adverse change occurs related to the outcome of the SEC investigation, possible litigation against Enron, balance sheet strengths, and earnings forecasts. Certainly the latest developments disclosed in Enron's 10-Q filing with the SEC impact the company's balance sheet strengths and earnings forecasts, so a case could be made that Dynegy would have grounds to terminate the acquisition. Clearly, this pending deal hinges on the developments that will take place over the next few weeks. Dynegy ultimately will have to weigh the pros and cons of its acquisition offer for Enron and determine if the once-golden company still represents a great deal, or if pursuing the purchase would cause more trouble than it is worth.

An archive list of previous IssueAlert articles is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

  _____

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>at 505.244.7650. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

  _____

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission and distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 505.244.7613.

  _____

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer colleagues to receive our free, daily IssueAlert articles, please register directly on our site at secure.scientech.com/issuealert <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.

  _____

SCIENTECH's IssueAlert(SM) articles are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlert articles is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.
  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=11/21/2001>


Debbie,

This is an update on the continuing Winston saga. Tanya
identified the sections of the code that produce inefficiencies
but the rest is in the Winston's hands.

Steve Stock is very cooperative and takes a very rational, Enron-first
approach to the problem. Privately, my concern is that the code, based on
Tanya's
report to me, leaves a lot to be desired. The code tends to be a very
mechanical
implementation of the algorithm, developed without a series attempt to
optimize it.

Let's keep paddling along.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
08:53 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 05:38 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Winston

Vince,

...just to keep you in the loop on the Tanya / Winston issue...

regards

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Stock, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:36 PM
To: Tamarchenko, Tanya
Subject: RE: Winston

Tanya,

I just checked in with the contractors here.....and it looks like it might be
a good idea for you to spend about 30minutes with them to give you a guided
tour of their documentation.

It's presented as a linked set of word documents and Visio drawing, with
links to all the reletive parts as hyperlinks. It's pretty good and I imagine
it will be very usefull to you, but probably requires a little introduction
first.

Please feel free to come to my office whenever it is convenient. Even if I'm
not available, the guys are just outside my office and I can easily stop
whatever I'm doing to introduce you to the project manager.

regards

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tamarchenko, Tanya
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 4:53 PM
To: Stock, Stephen
Subject: Re: Winston

Steve,
- we spent about 5 fruitful hours with Winston last week.
- I pretty much understand the data flow when the code runs.
- I also got an idea where the time is spent during the execution of the code
by questioning Winston.
I did not see any results of profiling the code. Winston's opinion is (as I
understood) that he knows how much time is spent
on different calculations and profiling is not easy to do, so we don't need
to do it.
- Based on above I suggested possible way to reduce the time credit model
takes to run and we discussed it with Debbie, who was
going to arrange a meeting with Winston.
- It might be useful to look at the Documentation created by contractors, if
you have it handy - send it to me, please.

Thank you,

Tanya.

From: Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 03:38 PM
To: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Winston

Tanya,

how's it going with code-review from your perspective?

...did you manage to talk to our Documentation contractors?

...if not, would you me to arrange for them to bring you the documentation as
it currently stands?

regards

Steve


I did call you back yesterday on the Avista thing, but you were in a
meeting.  Did you ever find the deal or get an answer?


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 01:22 PM -----

	Ann Hicks@ENRON
	06/22/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Anne Hicks/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Ann Hicks/NA/Enron on 06/22/2000 09:40 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	06/21/2000 06:39 PM

		 To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Bobbie,
We have finally been able to track down a resume for Nelson Steele.  Based
upon his resume he is not someone we would have invited to interview for the
Analyst Program.  We have also spoken to the Portland Office regarding the
interview that Nelson had with them.  According to Amy Fitzpatrick, the HR
Rep in Portland, when he interviewed he was extremely unimpressive.
Consequently, he was not extended an offer by the Portland Office.  When they
called to tell him such, his response was, "that's OK because I did not want
to work there anyway."

I am doubtful that he will fare well in the interview process but will bring
him in if that is what is desired.  Please let me know how you wish for us to
proceed.  Thanks.
Charlene

Bobbie Power
11/07/2000 04:35 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:

Charlene I recently sent you a copy of a memo from Henry B. Steele - U of H
letterhead  regarding a gentleman by the name of Nelson who interviewed as a
day trader in Portland.  Mr. Lay's message was such  for us to follow up with
this.  Would you please let me or Cindy know the status of this memo.

Thanks Charlene for your help.

Bobbie


Jeff, here it is.  Take a look and if you have any questions, I'll be
prepared to address them promptly so you can send this off.


Here is the most recently updated 2002 Plan file.  Look under the "Summary" tab.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/14/99
05:03 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mail Delivery Subsystem <Mailer-Daemon@mailman.enron.com>
             06/14/99 05:02 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: brcepat.com: host not
found)

The original message was received at Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:02:11 -0500 (CDT)
from dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<DRank@brcepat.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <DRank@brcepat.com>... Host unknown (Name server: brcepat.com: host not
found)

   ----- Original message follows -----

Return-Path: <rsander@ect.enron.com>
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37])
 by mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id RAA07920
 for <DRank@brcepat.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:02:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (notes.ect.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
 by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA08117
 for <DRank@brcepat.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:02:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999))  id
86256790.0078B9CF ; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:58:38 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Richard B Sanders" <rsander@ect.enron.com>
To: DRank@brcepat.com
Message-ID: <86256790.0078B963.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:02:04 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Congrats on your new arrival. I hope all is going well. I had lunch w/ Bill
Gage
today and he mentioned that they had an opening at his firm. I think they are
shy about talking to current Bracewell attys. I told him that I had talked to
you about other opportunities after the partner decisions were made and that I
would pass along the information. If you are interested, Bill's # is
713--225--4500.


The Executive Committee Meeting scheduled for today, Monday the 7th has been
cancelled.  I will contact everyone on
Wednesday the 9th with the details of next scheduled meeting.

Regards,

Bill.


If you run a business and are reading this e-mail
	chances are you have probably heard of merchant
	accounts.

	While there are lots of other Merchant Account
	Venders telling you all the same thing, we don't
	have any limited time offers, no monthly sales
	or any other slick marketing techniques.

	Our Prices are the lowest, we never have set up
	fee or application fee.  Our Monthly rates
	already are super low, our transaction fee
	is so low it's almost free!!

        Reply to this e-mail with your

        Name:
        Phone Number:
        Best time to call :

	One of our helpful staff will call you and help
	you set up your account.

	For Whatever size your business is, we have an
	account perfect for you.  If you have any
	previous credit problems? Don't worry about it
	because we won't either!!

	While our competition may have a sale this month,
	Or won't charge you a set up fee today. We have
	a sale everyday.  All you need to do to take
	advantage of this every day offer is simply

	Reply today and you can accept;

	Visa   Mastercard   American Express

	Discover   Novus   Direct Checks

        Fax Checks and  Also Accept Debit Cards !!

        Remember, this is not a sale, not a limited
	time offer.  We Offer the best rates, all the
	time.

        You are 99.8% GUARANTEED to get a merchant account.

	So what are you waiting for?

        For more information please:

        Reply to this e-mail with your

        Name:
        Phone Number:
        Best time to call :

        It's that easy.

---------------------------------------------------
	To be Removed from this list Please reply
	with "Remove" in the subject line
	and you will be removed within 24 hours.

fyqukgcivgjfttim


[IMAGE]	         	[IMAGE] vs   [IMAGE]
		Merchant Development Risk in Power Generation

		A Henwood Multi-client Study

		Henwood Energy Services, Inc. (Henwood) offers an opportunity to participate in a cutting edge study of the potential collision of coal and gas and its implications for the electric industry as the battle for the fuel at the margin unfolds.

The recent rise in natural gas price over the past year, culminating in a price spike of historic proportions in January 2001 has many industry participants reevaluating the role of natural gas as the "bridge fuel" for the twenty-first century. Some observers suspect that low cost gas reserves are tapped out, making reliance on this fuel alone imprudent from an overall portfolio standpoint. 		[IMAGE]

		 Currently, there are plans in the works for nearly 40 coal power projects across North America representing 20,000 MW of capacity. Henwood's scenario-based study is designed to cost-effectively enable utilities and project developers assess the regional viability of new, commercially available coal technology using cutting edge screening analysis and their impact on new gas projects.  Participation is limited - sign-up by June 15th to receive the Charter Member price and to participate in the kickoff meeting scheduled for June 20th at the Hyatt Regency Downtown, Houston. Also sign up for the Henwood ERCOT PMA Workshop on June 20th at the same location by calling Jessica Fielder at 916/569-0985.  Click here to learn more about getting in on the ground floor of this opportunity.
		This message is brought to you as a registered user of Energy Central.  If you wish to discontinue receiving this type of message, reply to this message with 'Stop Ads' in the subject of your message.


Rick - per our  conversation.  I have reiterated to Tom that I would like to
see these types of docs before they go to SK or others outside of the
comnpany.  Let's discuss.  Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Montovano/NA/Enron on 05/08/2001
03:35 PM ---------------------------

Tom Chapman@ECT
04/30/2001 04:57 PM
To: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Paper to Kean, Linnell, and Scott Galwicki

Steve-

I did not copy you on this paper that I sent to Steve Kean, Elizabeth
Linnell, and Scott Galwicki.  Sorry about that.  I sent it to them last
Friday per your requests.

Tom


No existing contracts with Boeing.  Attached is a draft sent 6/01.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


This spreadsheet shows the current estimates are approximately 12,000/day
short of what the estimates would be with the revised Entex Factor.

Call me if you have any questions.  I will work to get the revised estimates
into POPs today.

Gary


Did NSTAR terminate?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Nicolay, Christi L.; Nettelton, Marcus; Davis, Mark Dana; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: RE: UI Termination

No.  I guess the question I have now is if NSTAR and UI have terminated, do we still need to keep EPMI in the NEPOOL market?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nettelton, Marcus; Davis, Mark Dana
Subject: UI Termination

Do we need to do anything special in terms of notification to NEPOOL as it relates to the 1/1/02 termination of UI?

Thanks,

Don 713-412-8967 cell


(See attached file: hpl0707.xls)

 - hpl0707.xls


Records indicate that there are a significant number of employees who have yet to have a drug test.

Here are the details of the locations in Houston, Portland and other locations.

Please attend one as soon as possible to avoid delays in your your onboarding and payroll processing.

HR


Martin,

Can you prepare a draft of recommendation for  Eric?
I can elaborate more and sign it.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	VKaminski@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:52 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Fwd: Hello from Vince

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-Path: <ericcope@stanford.edu>
Received: from  rly-za02.mx.aol.com (rly-za02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.98]) by air-za04.mail.aol.com (v83.30) with ESMTP id MAILINZA49-0122212717; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:27:17 -0500
Received: from  smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.stanford.edu [171.64.14.116]) by rly-za02.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZA21-0122212654; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 21:26:54 -0500
Received: from netlab302.Stanford.EDU (netlab302.Stanford.EDU [171.64.112.12])	by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0N2QoC10013	for <VKaminski@aol.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eric Cope <ericcope@stanford.edu>
Reply-To: ericcope@stanford.edu
Organization: Stanford University
To: VKaminski@aol.com
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:26:50 -0800
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <55.2155640c.297f7485@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <55.2155640c.297f7485@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <02012218265005.06709@netlab302.Stanford.EDU>

Vince,

My phone is (650) 725-0541 (office).

I am still in a state of shock about Enron and I am still absorbing all the
news I can.  It is almost unbelievable to me that the company I worked for
this summer is now essentially kaput.

From the website I contacted you from, I take it that you are no longer with
Enron.  Please accept my deepest sympathies and best wishes in what must
surely be a difficult time.  I hope you were not as heavily invested in Enron
as many employees seemed to be.

I wanted to contact you regarding letters of recommendation.  I'm currently
looking for summer employment, in particular at network providers (such as
AT&T and IBM) as well as some financial institutions.  Would it be any
trouble for you to write a note on my behalf?  They may be requested via
email, so an actual letter may not be necessary.  I would have more details
later.

My best to you and your family and all those I knew this summer ---

Eric

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 06:05 pm, you wrote:
> Eric,
>
> Nice to hear from you. Please, send me your phone number and I will call
> you. My info:
>
> Vince Kaminski
> 10 Snowbird Place
> The Woodlands, TX 77381
> (281) 367 5377 (h)
> (713) 410 5396 (c)
> vkaminski@aol.com
>
> Vince

----------------------------------------
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"; name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description:
----------------------------------------


Susan:
I would like to talk to you briefly next week sometime about what in your
opinion would be the best way to train the new legal assistant that we plan
to hire.  In particular, could you give some thought as to what worked the
best for you and what didn't work.   I will keep whatever you say
confidential.  I also have discussed with Mark that I want you to play a
significant role in the training process given the outstanding progress that
you have made in the last year.  Could you also give that some thought and
let me know what you think?  Thanks.
Carol


eSource presents Free Global Energy Markets Presentation:

June. 5 	 9:00 -  9:30 AM	EB 5C2
June. 5 	 10:00 -  10:30 AM 	EB 5C2

Global Energy Markets
Global Energy Markets is an information service that gives you access to updated information and analysis whenever you need it.

Global Energy Markets provides many different news feeds and data sources in one service.  In addition, Global Energy Markets provides useful online databases for finding articles, projects and companies.

Each service is available by global region.  Services include the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe/CIS and the Middle East.  Each service includes four key modules.

The first core module is the energy news.  The news comes from Reuters, Dow Jones, Energy24x, BBC, AP, AFP, and others.  This is an all-in-one regional news service.  The other three modules are useful databases for finding news articles, project information and companies.  The second module is the Global Energy Projects Database.  The third module is the Global Energy News Archive.  The fourth is the Energy Companies Directory.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/globalenergymarkets.pdf

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
No Shows will be charged $50.00
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>