TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Saturday, December 1, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

/-------------------Also From NYTimes.com------------------\

Holiday Shopping

Take advantage of special offers and discounts -- on gifts,
travel and luxury items from NYTimes.com's premium
advertisers -- with the Holiday Shopping E-Mail.

http://www.nytimes.com/services/email/email.html#holiday
\---------------------------------------------------------/

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"I guess we all see a little of ourselves in him. He was in
the background, and maybe we all do little great things in
the background in our own lives."
-ROGER REECE, on George Harrison.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/obituaries/01GEOR.html?todaysheadlines

NATIONAL
=========================
Ashcroft Seeking to Free F.B.I. to Spy on Groups

Attorney General John Ashcroft is considering a plan to
relax restrictions on the F.B.I.'s spying on religious and
political organizations.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/national/01BURE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Connecticut Detects Anthrax on a Letter Near Victim's Home

Connecticut officials said that a trace amount   of anthrax
had been discovered on a letter delivered near the home of
a 94-year-old woman who died of the disease last week.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/nyregion/01ANTH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Man With Artificial Heart Dies 5 Months After Implant

Robert Tools,  the first recipient of  a self-contained
artificial heart, died Friday at Jewish Hospital in
Louisville, Ky.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/health/01HEAR.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\
Listen To An Exclusive Audio Program From Robin Williams - Free!

Audible provides the best audio entertainment and information - right
 now you can try us for free.  Listen to exclusive programs from Robin
Williams, learn a new language with the Learn In Your Car Series, sample
the audio version of The Wall Street Journal.  Try us out now at no
risk - you're sure to love what you hear.

http://ads.nyt.com/th.ad/th-audible91/audibletext12.1.html/?_RM_REDIR_=http://www.audible.com/nyt/anon14
\---------------------------------------------------------/

INTERNATIONAL
=========================
U.S. to Press Iraq to Let U.N. Inspect for Banned Arms

A State Department official said on Friday that President
Bush intended to force Iraq to open its borders to United
Nations weapons inspectors.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/international/middleeast/01DIPL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Bush Administration Says It's Too Early to Deploy
International Peacekeepers

Calling conditions on the ground too dangerous, the Bush
administration said on Friday that it was too soon to send
peacekeepers to Afghanistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/international/01MILI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Marines Dig In, but They Find Little to Battle

Hundreds of marines have turned a compound in the Afghan
desert into a heavily fortified base intended to intensify
military pressure on the Taliban.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/international/asia/01MARI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html?todaysheadline

BUSINESS
=========================
Enron Scrambles for Funds to Ease Way Into Bankruptcy

The fallout from Enron's collapse continued on Friday as the
company struggled to line up financing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/business/01ENRO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Report Offers Conflicting Signals on Recovery of the Economy

The economy shrank significantly  more this summer than the
government initially estimated, the Commerce Department
said on Friday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/business/01ECON.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Creditors' Move Puts Excite@Home's Service at Risk

A judge ruled on Friday that Excite@Home could sever its
contracts with cable companies, meaning that about 3.7
million subscribers could lose Internet access.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/technology/01NET.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE BUSINESS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html?todaysheadline

TECHNOLOGY
=========================
Creditors' Move Puts Excite@Home's Service at Risk

A judge ruled on Friday that Excite@Home could sever its
contracts with cable companies, meaning that about 3.7
million subscribers could lose Internet access.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/technology/01NET.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Cable and Wireless Bidding For Assets of Web Operator

Cable and Wireless made a bid on Friday to become the
biggest manager of Web sites in the United States.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/technology/01CABL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Apple Offers More Than an Update to Its System

Sometimes engineers fix software mistakes; other times the
task falls to lawyers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/technology/01APPL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?todaysheadline

POLITICS
=========================
G.O.P.'s National Chairman to Resign After Brief Term

Republican party officials accused the White House of
forcing Gov. James S. Gilmore III of Virginia from his post
as Republican national chairman.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/politics/01REPU.html?todaysheadlines

-----

2 Sides Turn More Heated in Exchanges Over Economy

Democrats intensified their efforts to portray Republicans
as more concerned about corporate interests than laid-off
workers and to pin   blame for the recession on President
Bush.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/politics/01DEMS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Special Education Increases Cut From Bill

Lawmakers rejected an attempt to guarantee multibillion
dollar increases for special education as part of a
sweeping education bill.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/education/01EDUC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE POLITICS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?todaysheadline

SPORTS
=========================
Daylight Is Narrowing for Bowl Hopefuls

Of the 25 postseason bowl games, only five have filled both
brackets, and another nine have selected a single team.
Much more will be known on Sunday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/sports/ncaafootball/01COLL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Wilpon Might Increase Mets' Payroll

Fred Wilpon hinted that he might authorize Mets General
Manager Steve Phillips to exceed the team's budget to sign
a top player.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/sports/baseball/01METS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Security, and Event, Will Be Extraordinary

Concerned that the country's most watched sporting event
would be an inviting target for   terrorists, the federal
government and the N.F.L. are planning extraordinary
measures to protect the Super Bowl.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/sports/football/01SUPE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE SPORTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html?todaysheadline

ARTS
=========================
George Harrison, 'Quiet Beatle' and Lead Guitarist, Dies at
58

George Harrison, the youngster of the Beatles who composed
some of their most venerated songs, died on Thursday in Los
Angeles.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/obituaries/01GEOR.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Break Up Afghanistan? Why Not?

Some experts believe ethnic groups that have been warring
for generations would be better off in separate nations.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/arts/01PROF.html?todaysheadlines

-----

A Black Author Hurls That Word as a Challenge

Randall Kennedy, an African-American scholar at Harvard,
argues that new uses of "nigger" are helping to exorcise
the word's power as America's paradigmatic ethnic slur.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/books/01BOOK.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE ARTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/arts/index.html?todaysheadline

NY REGION
=========================
Connecticut Detects Anthrax on a Letter Near Victim's Home

Connecticut officials said that a trace amount   of anthrax
had been discovered on a letter delivered near the home of
a 94-year-old woman who died of the disease last week.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/nyregion/01ANTH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Shoplifting Charge Ends U.S. Manhunt for Real Estate Heir

The nationwide manhunt for Robert A. Durst, the scion of a
wealthy Manhattan real estate family, ended when he was
arrested for shoplifting.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/nyregion/01DURS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Bush Picks Virginia Prosecutor for U.S. Attorney

President Bush announced that he would nominate   James B.
Comey as United States attorney for the Southern District
of New York to succeed Mary Jo White.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/nyregion/01ATTO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NY REGION NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.html?todaysheadline

OP-ED
=========================
Join the Club
By BILL KELLER
The terror attacks have actually made the enlargement of the
NATO family more right than ever.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/opinion/01KELL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

It Can Happen Here
By ANTHONY LEWIS
It seems shocking that the United States Department of
Justice should state as a fact something that a judge has
found to be untrue.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/opinion/L01LEWI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Getting at the Roots of Arab Poverty
By ALAN SCHWARTZ
Many Muslims are not poor because we are rich; they are poor
because of the policies their countries pursue.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/opinion/01SCHW.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE OP-ED  NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html?todaysheadline

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or uncheck the headlines you would like to receive
and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on
"Save Selections." To change your e-mail address, go to our
help center: http://www.nytimes.com/help.  Suggestions and
feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com so that we can track any reports of problems:
403230

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Borderline
No.  2001-20<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
October 23, 2001

Just in case any night owls are planning to access our customer activity site on Wednesday, October 24, HotTap will be unavailable starting at 10:30 p.m. CCT.

If all goes well, HotTap should be back before midnight.  The worst-case scenario would extend this planned outage till 3:30 a.m. Thursday morning.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Government Affairs Organization Announcement

With the announcement of Enron's acquisition by Dynegy behind us, and with the initial severance process completed, it seemed an appropriate time to effect some organizational changes so that we as a group are better prepared to meet the challenges of the future.  Before I turn to the organizational changes, I would like to say a few words about those who will be leaving the company as a result of the initial severance (you'll know who they are by their absence on the organizational chart): Leading and being a part of this group has been a privilege?I am thankful for every day that I have had that responsibility and thankful for however long I continue to have the responsibility.  This sense of privilege and thankfulness is primarily driven by having had the opportunity to get to know and care about such a dedicated group of professionals and support staff and who, to a person, are also very decent and good people.  To say good-bye to some of our colleagues is not easy.  I want to, on behalf of all of us, thank them for their hard work, their integrity, their decency, and the good times and laughter that we shared.  I trust that many of us will find ways to sustain friendships that have been and will continue to be very special.  Thanks to each of you who are leaving for all you have done.

As to the organizational structure, it has become increasingly apparent to me that the existing organization, with a mix of groups organized along functional and regional lines (particularly within the U.S.), has impeded our ability to get things done in the most efficient fashion at times.  The need to rationalize the organizational structure, in order to consolidate all U.S. energy functions, is a strong need from my perspective.  As a result, Jim Steffes will lead the U.S. Energy group along with Sue Nord, who will jointly report to Jim and myself.  Sue will assist Jim in the leadership of the group and take on project management responsibilities as warranted to help Jim shoulder a significant burden.  Also reporting to Jim will be a leadership group for U.S. Energy that will be as follows:  Wholesale Electricity will be led by Christi Nicolay; Retail Electricity and Natural Gas will be led by Harry Kingerski; Wholesale Gas will be led by Leslie Lawner.   Last, but not least, Jeff Dasovich and Sue Mara, who will continue to focus on California energy issues, will report to Jim. (Sue Mara will also be part of the Wholesale electricity team).

Steve Montovano, who will continue to report to me, will lead a commercial development effort along with Dan Allegretti.

With the elimination of the regional groups, I also recognize that there is a need to continue to focus on how we as a group address our political/legislative needs across the U.S.  Paul Kaufman will lead a small group that will address that need and that will focus on state political support.  Paul will also take the lead for Government Affairs in support of corporate development efforts across the U.S.

Much of the rest of the group remains the same.  Linda Robertson will continue to lead the Washington group with Sarah Novosel, who reports to Linda, taking the lead role in our coordination of activities at FERC.  Amr Ibrahim will continue to lead the support of the Global Assets group and also continue to manage the Risk Analytics function.  Maggy Huson will take over support of the non-energy business units, which are as follows: Global Markets, Industrial Markets, Networks, and Broadband.  Rob Hemstock will continue to lead the support of Enron Canada.  Paul Dawson, who heads up government affairs for Europe; Sergio Assad, who heads up government affairs for South America; and Mike Grimes and Mark Crowther, who head up our Asian efforts, will continue to jointly report to the business units and myself.

I am also forming a North American leadership group for Government Affairs to provide policy guidance for the larger group and the company.  That Committee will consist of Rob Hemstock, Maggy Huson, Amr Ibrahim, Paul Kaufman, Harry Kingerski, Leslie Lawner, Steve Montovano, Christi Nicolay, Sue Nord, Sarah Novosel, Linda Robertson, Jim Steffes and myself.  We will also continue to have an RCR Committee that will consist of Maggy Huson, Harry Kingerski, Sue Nord, Linda Robertson, Jim Steffes & myself.  Finally, I am forming a Dynegy/Enron regulatory approvals working group that will consist of Jose Bestard, Paul Dawson, Paul Kaufman, Sue Nord, Sarah Novosel and myself.

No organizational structure or set of organizational changes is either perfect or permanent.  I believe these changes will make us better and more prepared for the future.  However, we must be prepared to further adjust as the future unfolds for the company.

One final note: I am deeply sorry that each of you has had to live through this uncertain and troubled period for the company.  We are all saddened by the recognition that we are in the midst of changes that will leave our group fundamentally altered, but we must resolve to do our best for each other and ourselves during this period of change to ensure that what emerges, for those of us who do remain a part of the new Dynegy, reflects the excellence and integrity that has characterized our group.  Personally, I will do all I can, for as long as I can, to steer the group through this to the very best place possible.  Your continued dedication and support is very much appreciated.  Hang in there and thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000
01:19 PM ---------------------------
   Kim S Theriot                04/27/2000 12:54 PM

To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Firm and CAISO Language

Christian asked that I send this to you....These are the current definitions
that we are using for FIRM and CAISO in the West.

Kim Theriot


Please review and comment.  I have the buy in from the University on the last
paragraph (Geoff).  I would like to send this letter out today.  Thanks

Rob Cone

Project Manager
Enron Energy Services
12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
San Ramon, CA 94583
Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
Pager:888.397.5826


Please give all requests to Drew Kanellopoulos or Stephan Plauche in my absence during the week of 4/22/02.

Thanks,
ds


Dad,

This article does a very good job of explaining what Enron does on a macro
level.

Check it out!

Chris

www.fortune.com/fortune/fortune500/enr.html


Don't faint, but I am holding the original fully executed CA's for enovate
and Peoples (sent by Gregg Penman).  Whew, those took a really long time
didn't they?  How is Mississippi?

K-

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


don't forget-they could ask for any CD turnback as well to minimize expansion requirements
We will turn back BLK 2 if given chance

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Allen, Phillip K.; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Shireman, Kristann; Hewitt, Jess; Courtney, Mark; Black, Don
Subject:	RE: RP01-484, Complaint against FR contracts on El Paso

Yes, it has been noticed.  Comments are due August 2.  The other complaint, RP01-486, by the Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona shippers has also been noticed and comments are due August 6.

I agree that we should intervene and support discontinuation of the FR contracts.  I would like to see us also support some proposed solution(s).  I think there is some merit to the Salt River Project "conceptual" solution -- up to the point where they call for continuing the current system seemingly until El Paso expands their system sufficiently to handle everybody's needs forever.  Some entitlement for FR shippers that recognizes the seasonal nature of their loads, which is how the system operates anyway, would be a reasonable solution.  Also, El Paso needs to at least make a nominal contribution to the solution by agreeing to some expansions to the general system.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:17 AM
To:	Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Allen, Phillip K.; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Shireman, Kristann; Hewitt, Jess; Courtney, Mark; Black, Don
Subject:	RP01-484, Complaint against FR contracts on El Paso

I would recommend that when we intervene in RP01-484, the Joint Complaint against El Paso, that we side with the complainants against continuation of the FR contracts.  The gist of the complaint is that the full requirements contracts (East of California customers) on El Paso are creating capacity problems, as the loads these contracts serve keep growing, and cutting into El Paso's ability to serve the California customers.  My real problem is EES's inability to get firm primary rights into Arizona markets, which cost us millions in imbalance charges earlier this year.  Any thoughts?  Becky, has it been noticed yet?


Doug:

Please let me know if you receive this e-mail, by replying to it.  This is a
test to:
dfarmer@enron.com

Thanks.  Sarah.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Reminiscences of a Stock Operator
by Edwin Lefevre

Excellent book on trading

Hunter


We are still working on the plane, and the answer is that the plane will be
billed to the RC reserving it for the flight.    If commercial wants to take
it to a lower level than that it will be up to them to do so.     It will
take some actual doing on our side to make this happen, but it can be
done.     The budget will be taken care of in Planning as we go through the
year.      From an ETS point of view all of the plane is in Commercial or
Executive (Stan) and so it should not be a problem to track the budget.
Tracy has the point on this one.

Jim Saunders:    What do you know about the other comments?

Mike McGowan
12/12/2000 10:16 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Accounting for plane usage in year 2001

Rod--

I never heard back from you on this airplane accounting issue for year 2001.
Any thoughts on timing as to who we can work with to finalize by year end?
Can we work with Dave Waymire here in Omaha??

Also,  there was an article in  this past  Sunday's World Herald that   FASB
has reversed its position on merger accounting and will not require firms to
amortize Goodwill  over time and  write it off against current income of a
merged company.  In addition, the new plan would eliminate the  "pooling of
interest"  restrictions and allow merged companies to sell off unwanted
assets prior to the two year waing period now required.  I'm not sure if this
revision would be applicable to mergers which occurred before this FASB
revision or not.

Do you have any insights on this???

Thank You.

Mike McGowan
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron on 12/12/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

Mike McGowan
11/21/2000 11:40 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Courtney Barker/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Accounting for plane usage in year 2001

Rod - we have discussed the accounting for plane uasage on year 2001 and have
determined that  the actual trip costs will be billed direct to the user's
RC.  However,  the 2001 budget costs for the plane have been included in Dan
McCarty's executive RC budget.  Thus, we will have to develop a procedure to
charge the RC for atctual costs, but credit the plane budget and maintain
some control as to the overall status of the budget.

Who would you like me to work with to develop/coordinate these procedures?

Thanks!


half day of vac on 2/28
12.20 dentist appt on 2/29


Today we released additional information about our related party and off-balance sheet transactions.  We have made this information available both on our website and in a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The information provides further details about:

	-- the $1.2 billion charge to shareholders' equity announced in the third quarter and the transactions related to that charge;
	-- a restatement of prior years' financial statements to reflect this reduction in shareholders' equity, the consolidation of     three entities and prior year proposed audit adjustments and reclassifications;
	-- the Special Committee appointed by the Enron Board of Directors to review transactions between Enron and related parties;
	-- the LJM limited partnerships, including a discussion of transactions between Enron and LJM entities; and
	-- transactions between Enron and other Enron employees.

This information addresses a number of concerns that have been raised by our shareholders and the SEC.  As our Board's new Special Committee continues its review of various matters, we will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation, and we will continue to respond to investor requests so that they can evaluate, appreciate and appropriately value the strength of our core businesses.

Restatement of Earnings

Based on information that we have recently obtained, Enron and its auditors determined that certain off-balance sheet entities should have been included in Enron's consolidated financial statements pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles.  As a result, Enron will restate its financial statements from 1997 to 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001.  These restatements have no material effect on Enron's current financial position.  Here are some details included in the filing:

Net income for each period will be impacted by the retroactive consolidation of Joint Energy Development Investments (JEDI) and Chewco beginning in November 1997, the consolidation of an LJM1 subsidiary for 1999 and 2000 and prior year proposed audit adjustments.  Enron's current assessment indicates that the restatement will include:

	-- a reduction of approximately $96 million in 1997
	-- a reduction of approximately $113 million in 1998
	-- a reduction of approximately $250 million in 1999
	-- a reduction of approximately $132 million in 2000
	-- an increase of approximately $17 million for the first quarter of 2001
	-- an increase of approximately $5 million for the second quarter of 2001
	-- a reduction of $17 million for the third quarter of 2001.

The consolidation of JEDI and Chewco also will increase Enron's debt by approximately $711 million in 1997, $561 million in 1998, $685 million in 1999 and $628 million in 2000.

The restatement will have no material impact on Enron's reported earnings for the nine-month period ending September 2001.

You can obtain more detailed information on the items described above by accessing the Form 8-K filing at <http://www.enron.com/corp/sec/>.

We will continue to review our strategic, operational and financial position, and we will continue to keep you updated on any developments.


I can attend.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:54 PM
To:	Hemstock, Robert; Huson, Margaret; Kaufman, Paul; Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Novosel, Sarah; Robertson, Linda; Steffes, James D.; Ibrahim, Amr
Cc:	Sietzema, Linda; Warner, Geriann; Ausenhus, Kara; Buerger, Rubena; Noske, Linda J.; Perez, Carmen; Hawkins, Bernadette; Sullivan, Lora; Stransky, Joan; Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:	Government Affairs Strategy Meeting in Houston

Rick would like to hold a strategy meeting in Houston next week as follows:

Date:		Thursday, November 15

Time:		9:00 AM - 4:00 PM (CDT)

Location:	ECN 30C2

As you can see, I have a conference room reserved on the 30th floor.  I'm in the process of checking into other rooms on our bank of elevators.  I'll let you know if anything changes.

Also, please confirm your attendance to this meeting by responding to this e:mail.

Thanks!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


B2B = business to business, usually referring to on-line (Internet-based) electronic commerce (e-commerce).

B2C = business -to-consumer

C2C = consumer-to-consumer


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
This week's free SourceBook Weekly article, "AES: SourceBook's Company
of the Year," can be accessed at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 28, 2000
Duke Energy Offers Fixed-Priced Electricity Package for SDG&E
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Duke Energy, through its business unit Duke Energy North America (DENA),
has submitted an offer to manage San Diego Gas & Electric's (SDG&E) 3,300-MW
electricity load. The offer would establish a fixed price of 6 cents per
kilowatt-hour for wholesale power supply for the next five years, based
on market prices for electricity and natural gas as of Nov. 17, 2000. DENA's
proposal, which takes into account SDG&E's seasonal and hourly load
requirements
and has a 3-percent annual adjustment for inflation, was included in comments
submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) last week
in response to the commission's proposed remedies for California's electricity
market.

ANALYSIS: As has been well documented in this column and elsewhere, SDG&E
customers witnessed a staggering increase in the price of their electricity
last summer and into this fall, which resulted primarily from an ongoing
imbalance between supply and demand in the state of California. In addition,
other contributory factors have included the state's economic growth, lack
of new power plants over the last decade, unstable existing generation,
and the uncertainty of import prospects.

As SDG&E's rate freeze had been lifted last spring, customers of the utility
were exposed to retail electricity prices that often exceeded 18 cents
per kilowatt-hour, compared to the 6.5 cent per kilowatt hour maximum they
had become accustomed to under the rate freeze. The problem persists as
all three utilities in the state face high wholesale electricity prices.
However, SDG&E customers are as of yet the only ones in the state who bear
the brunt of the high prices as a rate freeze remains in effect for
California's
other two IOUs, SCE and PG&E.

DENA is proposing to FERC that it be granted the right to provide power
for the totality of SDG&E's 3,300 MW electricity load. In return, DENA's
proposed fixed rate of 6 cents per kilowatt hour (plus annual 3-percent
increases) presumably will be much lower than the cost SDG&E customers
will continue to face without such a contract. DENA's proposal has been
made possible as a result of FERC's proposed order that was issued last
month, outlining a major overhaul of California's energy market. Since
competition began in the state in the spring of 1998, the three California
IOUs were required to buy their power from the state's Power Exchange.
FERC's order proposes to eliminate the requirement of buying from the PX,
which essentially permits the three IOUs to establish bilateral contracts
with energy suppliers. DENA has seized upon this opportunity to gain a
very lucrative contract, while at the same time attempting to protect SDG&E
customers from exorbitant electricity prices.

So, what is SDG&E's response to DENA's proposal? I spoke with Doug Kline,
spokesperson for the utility, yesterday afternoon. Kline pointed out that,
first of all, SDG&E has not yet received any offer from DENA and that "all
we've seen thus far is a press release." Kline suggested that it was a
public relations strategy on the part of DENA to first submit its proposal
to FERC and that, ultimately, SDG&E would be the one to accept DENA's offer.
In order to speak in detail on DENA's proposal, Kline said he would need
to see an actual contract, which has yet to materialize. Kline did disclose
that locking up long-term contracts for SDG&E customers, based on today's
high prices, would have to be seriously questioned by the utility, especially
considering that new generation will be coming online in California over
the next few years.

Beyond that, SDG&E is fielding other offers from energy suppliers, and
in fact has established long-term contracts with other providers, which
remain unidentified, for 50 percent of the power it buys on the wholesale
market. Back in September, the CPUC granted approval for SDG&E (as well
as SCE and PG&E) to purchase 50 percent of its power in forward markets,
with the other 50 percent still coming from the PX. For SDG&E, this amounts
to 1,900 MW of its total electricity load. Kline said that SDG&E would
need to compare DENA's offer with those received or accepted from other
energy suppliers to know if it represents a good deal for SDG&E customers.

At the same time, Sempra Energy*SDG&E's parent company*has made its own
proposal to FERC, urging the federal regulators to order refunds for SDG&E
customers and place a rate cap on wholesale rates, based on generators'
actual fees. Under FERC's proposed order, the commission suggested a "soft
rate cap" of $150/MWh. It's referred to
as "soft" because sellers may bid above this level and receive their bid
if they are dispatched, but anything higher than $150/MWh will not set
the price that all generators will receive. Also, any generator setting
a bid above the soft rate cap must report their bid to the Commission,
and presumably fall under intense scrutiny.

This is not the first attempt that DENA has made to, as it says, "fix the
crisis" in California. In fact, back in August DENA offered California
Governor Gray Davis a deal in which the company would deliver 3,000 MW
of new supply to the state through the construction of generation facilities,
and provide all three IOUs with five-year, fixed-priced supply contracts.
Although Gov. Davis did not finalize a deal that would apply to all three
IOUs, SCE and PG&E proceeded with their own wholesale electricity contracts
with DENA. Both deals were sealed within the last month, although the specific
prices of the contracts are proprietary.

DENA has also proceeded with building new generation in the state. Just
two weeks ago, the company broke ground on a $525 million modernization
of its Moss Landing Power Plant in Monterey County. The modernization effort
is projected to add 1,060 MW of new capacity to site's current 1,500 MW
and create the state's largest power plant. DENA claims that, when completed,
the 2,560 MW that the plant will produce will generate enough wholesale
electricity to serve approximately 2.5 million households. In addition,
DENA has pending applications with the California Energy Commission to
modernize and expand two other power plants in California (Morro Bay and
South Bay power plants).

DENA's motivations are pretty understandable. The company may espouse good
intentions of helping California recover from its crisis but, realistically,
energy suppliers stand to make an awful lot of money from the state. I
started to notice the trend last month as 3Q earnings were reported. Virtually
every company that is active in California's wholesale market reported
a significant increase in earnings, reflective of the summer price volatility.
DENA was no exception. As a whole, Duke Energy reported record 3Q earnings
of $2.08 per share, a 73-percent increase over earnings per share of $1.20
for 3Q 1999. The company's North American Wholesale Energy*comprised of
DENA and Duke Energy Merchants*posted sharply higher gains with EBIT of
$231 million, a 175-percent increase over 3Q 1999. According to Duke Energy's
report, DENA achieved strong performance from its fleet of merchant power
plants and from natural gas and power trading activities.  DENA remains
on schedule to deliver approximately 3,200 megawatts of new merchant
generation
(nationally) in time for summer 2001.

Moreover, it is as of yet unknown whether or not DENA's offer truly benefits
SDG&E and its customers. The proposal certainly benefits DENA, however,
especially if the company can lock in a contract that is based on current
high prices and includes annual increases. Securing SDG&E customers under
these factors would be a major coup for DENA in the California market,
but how it stacks up against SDG&E's other unnamed offers remains to be
seen.
==============================================================
Learn more about SCIENTECH's Issues and Analysis products and services
at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IA.html
==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "remove" in the subject line.


Hi Mark...me again.  You really are missing my presence in the controls group
aren't you?

Mark Fondren
05/12/2000 09:16 AM
To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wade Doshier/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claude
Straub/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim
Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 1 and 5 Day Loss Limit 5/5 - 5/11

The 1 and 5 day loss violation resulted from being net short 2M bbls Heat
with the Heat contract up $.10 cpg and short 2.4M bbls of WTI when the WTI
contract is up 10%.


I believe that Goldman is the file that you took back from me la while ago to
handle yourself, remember?

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3880D
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	02/23/2001 08:40 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Goldman Sachs International - Terms of Business Letter

Cheryl:

Goldman is one of the brokers "messed up" in Lotus Notes.  I had given you
the files some time ago with my comments.  I think it would make sense for us
to sort through Goldman for all affiliated companies.  I don't see an
agreement in Lotus Notes for ECT Inv. and Goldman Int'l.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 08:37 AM -----

	Theresa T Brogan
	02/22/2001 06:20 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Goldman Sachs International - Terms of Business Letter

Sara/Cheryl,
 ECT Investments Inc has received a faxed document from Goldman Sachs
International  regarding terms of business for executing equity transactions
through the London office.  This document is not intended for the purposes of
opening up a new executing broker accouunt with Goldman Sachs International.
ECT Investments Inc currently has an existing executing broker agreement with
Goldman Sachs & Co which should cover trades done in Houston and London since
we are trading under the same legal entity.  The Terms of Business Letter
sets forths terms and conditions that would apply to transactions executed by
ECT Investments in London which is governed under the SFA rules and
regulations.
 I will forward a copy of the document to Cheryl.  Goldman Sachs
International is waiting for us to review and sign.  If you have additional
questions and concerns, I can be reached at extension 31439.

Thanks,
Theresa


Let's have this signed and fax per below.  Thanks.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/17/99 02:25
PM ---------------------------

Michael Etringer

11/17/99 01:12 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Disclosure Agreement

  Comments from Deseret attached.  Let me know if they are OK.  If ok please
make changes and fax a signed copy to Phil Tice at Deseret.
His Fax Number is:  801-892-6599.  They will sign and return a copy.

Thanks for the help.
Mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT on 11/17/99
11:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Phil Tice" <philtice@deseretgt.com>
11/17/99 11:03 AM

To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Disclosure Agreement

Mike:  Attached are my comments on the disclosure agreement.

Phil
 - CA(Deseret).doc


How does this deal work - deal 165385?


They all have it now. I thought you would enjoy this one.

Did you hear about the protest in Enron's Chicago office.  40 ACORN members
stormed in, demanding that Gregg Penman fax a letter to Ken Lay.  No kidding.

ckm

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Wonder if its off the balance sheet?

How about forward ing this article to legal / finance / accounting, with the
theme being that our Pompano site on a relative basis is a cake walk. I'd
like to see Duke's financial model...

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thu 5/24/2001 1:19 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Carnahan, Kathleen; Sole, Carlos; Engeldorf, Roseann; Gray,
Barbara
Cc:
Subject: Wonder if its off the balance sheet?

Duke Energy, Environmentalists Strike Deal over California Plant
Tom Knudson

May. 16, 2001
Knight Ridder Tribune Business News - KRTBN
Copyright (C) 2001 KRTBN Knight Ridder Tribune Business News; Source: World
Reporter (TM)

Days after state regulators gave Duke Energy the go-ahead to expand its Moss
Landing Power Plant near Monterey Bay last fall, documents show four
environmental groups made their own deal with the utility giant. The four
signed an agreement not to "participate in any lawsuit (or) regulatory
challenge" that might slow or stop the project in exchange for a financial
concession: $1 million from Duke for environmental "monitoring and research."

Balancing power generation and environmental protection always has been
difficult. But today, as power-starved California scrambles to find and
permit new energy sources, some fear the Moss Landing agreement shows that
money can sway even environmentalists -- and tip the scales too far in favor
of economic development.

Environmentalists who signed the agreement, though, said that despite their
concerns about the plant expansion, they had little chance of stopping it,
especially after it was approved by the California Energy Commission and
Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

So they took the potentially controversial step: entering into an agreement
with Duke for financial resources to pay for studies of the plant's impact on
the marine environment.

Other environmentalists, though, criticized that approach.

Duke Energy's efforts to modernize the Moss Landing Power Plant resulted in
mitigation payments to environmental and other groups, including:

$7 million to the Elkhorn Slough Foundation to mitigate the plant's use of
seawater.

$425,000 to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation over three years to monitor
heated seawater discharge in the ocean.

$1 million to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation over five years to
monitor water quality through a program sponsored by Save Our Shores, the
Center for Marine Conservation, the Friends of the Sea Otter and the Otter
Project.

$100,000 to the Marine Mammal Center to relocate its triage center for
injured animals onto power plant property.

$3.4 million to the Moss Landing Chamber of Commerce over 20 years for
infrastructure improvements in the Moss Landing community.

$100,000 to design and construct a boardwalk for additional beach access in
Moss Landing.

$60,000 for an environmental assessment for a proposed Elkhorn Slough Circle
Trail. If approved, Duke would provide an additional $250,000 endowment to
maintain the trail.

"It is very disheartening," said Carolyn Nielson, a retired teacher who along
with some other local residents is waging a battle against what they consider
an environmentally harmful power plant cooling system.

"These environmental groups have the expertise, the biologists, the
attorneys," said Nielson, who has taken her case to the State Water Resources
Control Board. "We could have been much more successful with their help. But
there wouldn't have been any financial reward in it for them."

Such criticisms are off-base, according to Warner Chabot, regional director
for the Center for Marine Conservation, a national environmental group that
was among those to sign the deal. He said environmentalists got the best deal
possible in the current energy climate.

"Look at what's happening with power plant approvals in California right
now," said Chabot, referring to the state's push to bring new energy sources
on line.

The Moss Landing project -- which is scheduled to add 1,060 megawatts in
2002, enough to serve one million homes -- is a key part of that energy
expansion plan.

No money will go to the four environmental groups -- the Center for Marine
Conservation, along with Save Our Shores, Friends of the Sea Otter and the
Otter Project. It will be routed, in five yearly installments of $200,000
each, to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, a nonprofit organization that
helps support sanctuary programs, including scientific research.

Chabot helped found the sanctuary foundation and sits on its board. He said
the money will be used to monitor the health of Elkhorn Slough, a
biologically rich estuary that borders the plant and is linked to Monterey
Bay.

"Not a dime comes to the Center for Marine Conservation," he said. "Not a
penny comes to me."

Duke representatives said the controversy about the arrangement has been
stirred by a handful of people.

"It's a million dollars worth of water quality studies," said Duke spokesman
Tom Williams. "Our whole effort wasn't to try to buy anybody off. It was
designed to help increase people's comfort level where there wasn't a comfort
level."

The $1 million agreement signed in November is part of a package of more than
$12 million in Duke payments to civil, government and environmental groups in
connection with the plant modernization.

The heftiest award -- $7 million to the Elkhorn Slough Foundation, a
nonprofit environmental organization -- was negotiated by state agencies to
"mitigate" environmental impacts of the plant.

Formed in 1982, the slough foundation exists to promote "the wise use and
conservation of Elkhorn Slough and surrounding wetlands," its Web site says.
However, some environmentalists say the state-approved mitigation plan is
inadequate.

"If you want to say, 'Who did Duke roll with a big chunk of money?' I would
say they rolled the California Energy Commission and the Regional Water Board
for the price of mitigation," Chabot said. "The agencies got bought off
cheap. And the environment got taken to the cleaners."

Duke's Williams strongly disagreed. Environmental mitigation "must be based
on science, not on buying anybody off," he said. "That is inappropriate, and
we would not participate in that.

"That suggestion is offensive to us. And it should be offensive to any
environmentalist."

Bob Haussler, head of the Energy Commission's environmental protection
office, said the mitigation plan is biologically sound. "We are confident it
will improve the slough ecosystem," he said.

Madeline Clark, a local businesswoman and founder of Monterey Parkway -- a
citizens group that scrutinizes local public works projects -- called the
recipients of Duke's payments a "shopping list" of government agencies,
environmental groups and civic organizations. She was particularly critical
of the $1 million deal with environmental groups.

"You know what bothers me?" Clark said. "Environmental groups get tons of
donations. Their purpose is to protect and defend the environment. If a big
corporation like Duke can come in and buy them off, I have a real problem
with that."

Construction began in November on Duke's project to add 1,060 megawatts of
natural gas-fired electrical capacity to the Moss Landing plant, purchased
from PG&E in 1998.

If the expansion is finished next year, as scheduled, it would account for
more than 30 percent of all new generation in California in 2002.

"This is a big deal," said Williams, the Duke spokesman. "It will be the
largest plant in California. If that plant is delayed a month or two, we lose
the summer of 2002. And that affects not only Duke Energy, but the state of
California."

Opponents say it's not the power they oppose, but the plant's cooling system,
which will pump about 1.2 billion gallons of seawater each day from Moss
Landing Harbor. Such pumping, they say, will degrade Elkhorn Slough. They
argue for an alternative cooling system, such as towers that re-circulate
water.

"Basically, what that plant will do is take 25 percent of the volume of the
harbor and slough, run it through a pipe and dump it back into the ocean with
much of the marine life cooked and dead," said Steve Shimek, executive
director of the Otter Project.

For Shimek and other environmentalists, scientific studies commissioned by
Duke during the permitting process left key questions unanswered about the
plant's impact on the environment.

"There was no scientific evidence that would literally point to Duke causing
harm to the environment," said Vicki Nichols, executive director of Save Our
Shores. "We felt we didn't have strong standing to sue."

Instead, the environmentalists began negotiating with Duke for financial
payments for studies of environmental impacts of the modernization project.

The process "gave me tremendous pause and great concern," Nichols said. "I
knew there was going to be some perception that we were doing the wrong
thing."

She was right.

"As far as I'm concerned, with the price-gouging going on by the energy
wholesalers, they are just receiving stolen goods," said Clark, of the
citizens group.

Her skepticism was sharpened by the recent disclosure that Duke Energy
approached Gov. Gray Davis with a secret deal offering financial concessions
if the state dropped lawsuits and investigations into the power generator.

Chabot, with the Center for Marine Conservation, discouraged any comparison
between the two offers, calling it "grossly unfair and inaccurate."

Regardless of what was intended with the payments, Nielson said they stain
the process. "It is so destructive in terms of making everyone cynical," she
said.

Shimek took a different view. "We convinced Duke to spend $1 million toward
monitoring that, frankly, five years from now could very well come back to
haunt them," he said.

"Did we do the right thing? I have no idea. Did we try our best? Yes, we
did."


Phillip:

I have a meeting tomorrow morning with the Oregon PUC staff to discuss a
number of pricing and supply issues.  Can I use the information attached to
your e-mail in the meeting with staff?

Paul

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pallen@enron.com, pkaufma@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Attached  are two files that illustrate the following:

As prices rose, supply increased and demand decreased.  Now prices are
beginning to fall in response these market responses.


This meter is coming back up by 5M effective today, they are bringing their
unit back up.

Mary


Tana -

Here is the marked version of the final BETA

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


I need more details.  What PG&E entity is having the open season?  What are you bidding on?

-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Wed 6/20/2001 2:49 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Cc: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: FW: PG&E Credit Application

PG&E has an Open Season that closes on June 22 (this Friday). What is the litigation that Veronica is referring to? Commercially, we need to particpate - what are the issues that need to be addressed?

Regards,

Stephanie
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:   Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:27 PM
To:     Miller, Stephanie
Subject:        RE: PG&E Credit Application

Stephanie,

Because of the current litigation between Enron and PG&E, I had to get it approved with Bill and Legal.  I'll follow up to see where it is and let you know as soon as I hear something.

Veronica

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Miller, Stephanie
Sent:   Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:09 PM
To:     Espinoza, Veronica
Subject:        PG&E Credit Application

Wanted to make sure you have everything you need to respond to this application deadline (close of business this Friday).

Please respond and let me know your status. Forms looked very generic, nothing our of the ordinary.

Thanks

Stephanie Miller


FYI


James responded and filled me in on the issue.  Sounds like we need the automated link to solve future problems.  How are we going to clean up the existing backlog?  Did you know that this had grown so large?  James says that this sits in Shelly Stubbs' lap to solve and that he has offered up resources to help. Sounds as if the offer has not been taken by Shelly.

Bill is obviously out of his crisis mode on counterparty credit issues and has lifted his head to look at other things.  I hate getting these e-mails from him --he always has more info than I do on issues and for some reason his confidence level in operations is not incredibly strong because he always contacts me!  I would love for someone else on the operations team to gain his confidence and I am sure that you would like for him to come to you with issues instead of always contacting me first.  (Don't worry - you are not alone in this -- applies to EA, EGM and EIM as well).  Let's talk about how we can manage this better.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Tuesday, November  13, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Dayao, Anthony
Cc:	Apollo, Beth
Subject:	FW: Need Answers Today

This problem is a result of the lack an automated interface between GCP and RPS and RGS.  My understanding is that Todd Taylor on your team is working on this interface.  What is the expected completion of this interface, and if is later than today, what can be done to deliver this ASAP.  With the large number of Mass Market deals being done, it is imperative to have an automated solution to this problem.  Can you call me today with an update?  Thanks. -Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Tuesday, November  13, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Apollo, Beth; Scribner, James
Subject:	Need Answers Today

Can you update me today on status, issues and resolution?  We need to get back with Bill Bradford today.  --Sally
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bradford, William S.
Sent:	Monday, November  12, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Vasan, Sue; Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.
Cc:	Mills, Scott; Beck, Sally; Stubbs, Shelly
Subject:	RE: EES Weekly Status

This is totally unacceptable.  Is there any focus on cleaning this up?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vasan, Sue
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Harris, Molly; Slaughter, Chris; Mihalik, Teresa; Holzer, Erich; Power, Keith E.; Furey, Denise; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Subject:	EES Weekly Status

Big jump in the number of New Counterparties.  Up by 5,420 new counterparties.

 << File: EES Cpty Stats.xls >>


----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 02:14 PM -----

	Joyce Dorsey@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	04/30/2001 01:22 PM

		 To: Chezmaryjousa@aol.com, "Linda Cottingham" <withlove@farmerstel.com> @
ENRON, Sheri L Cromwell/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha
Schiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@ENRON,
CWOUSARet@aol.com, vinny.dorsey@jacobs.com, "Carolyn Jeffery"
<jcda9@scottsboro.org> @ ENRON, Kristi Miller <kristi01@swbell.net> @ ENRON,
JParr_1@email.msn.com, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, crohde@hou-endow.org,
wayloncs@aol.com, "Melvin Sexton" <msexton@mail1.scottsboro.org>, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
"Joanne Tolleson" <jcda10@scottsboro.org> @ ENRON, "Philippi, Liz"
<philippl@spring-branch.isd.tenet.edu> @ ENRON, "Thompson, Greg"
<GThompson@hsh.org>, "Jan Jacobs" <cjacobs@hcnews.com> @ ENRON, "Sam Arnold"
<jharnold@scottsboro.org>, "John R. Liles" <jrl@itexas.net> @ ENRON, "The
Derrick's" <rjddtx@earthlink.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fw: Stupid is as Stupid Does

Joyce Dorsey
Enron Broadband Services
Corporate Development
Phone:  713/853-3516
Cell Phone:      713/502-2246
joyce_dorsey@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Joyce Dorsey/Enron Communications on 04/30/01 01:24 PM
-----

	LANCE.AND.RENEE@prodigy.net
	04/30/01 12:44 PM
	Please respond to LANCE.AND.RENEE

		 To:
		 cc: (bcc: Joyce Dorsey/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: Fw: Stupid is as Stupid Does

Don't know if this is true but it's still funny!

Subject: Stupid is as Stupid Does

> This could be possibly the funniest story in a long while. This is a
> bricklayer's accident report, which was printed in the newsletter of the
> Australian equivalent of the Workers' Compensation board. This is a true
> story. Had this guy died, he'd have received a Darwin Award for sure....
>
>  Dear Sir
>
>  "I am writing in response to your request for additional information in
> Block 3 of the accident report form. I put "poor planning" as the cause of
> my accident. You asked for a fuller explanation and I trust the following
> details will be sufficient.
>
>  I am a bricklayer by trade. On the day of the accident, I was working
alone
> on the roof of a new six-story building. When I completed my work, I found
> that I had some bricks left over which, when weighed later were found to
be
> slightly in excess of 500 lbs. Rather than carry the bricks down by hand,
I
> decided to lower them in a barrel by using a pulley, which was attached to
> the side of the building on the sixth floor.
>
>  Securing the rope at ground level, I went up to the roof, swung the
barrel
> out and loaded the bricks into it. Then I went down and untied the rope,
> holding it tightly to ensure a slow descent of the bricks. You will note
in
> Block 11 of the accident report form that I weigh 135lbs.
>
>  Due to my surprise at being jerked off the ground so suddenly, I lost my
> presence of mind and forgot to let go of the rope. Needless to say, I
> proceeded at a rapid rate up the side of the building. In the vicinity of
> the third floor, I met the barrel, which was now proceeding downward at an
> equal, impressive speed. This explained the fractured skull, minor
> abrasions and the broken collar bone, as listed in section 3 of the
accident
> report form.
>
>  Slowed only slightly, I continued my rapid ascent, not stopping until the
> fingers of my right hand were two knuckles deep into the pulley.
> Fortunately by this time I had regained my presence of mind and was able
to
> hold tightly to the rope, in spite of beginning to experience a great deal
> of pain.
>
>  At approximately the same time, however, the barrel of bricks hit the
> ground and the bottom fell out of the barrel. Now devoid of the weight of
> the bricks, that barrel weighed approximately 50 lbs. I refer you again to
> my weight. As you can imagine, I began a rapid descent, down the side of
the
> building. In the vicinity of the third floor, I met the barrel coming up.
> This accounts for the two fractured ankles, broken tooth and several
> lacerations of my legs and lower body.
>
>  Here my luck began to change slightly. The encounter with the barrel
seemed
> to slow me enough to lessen my injuries when I fell into the pile of
bricks
> and fortunately only three vertebrae were cracked. I am sorry to report,
> however, as I lay there on the pile of bricks, in pain, unable to move, I
> again lost my composure and presence of mind and let go of the rope and I
> lay there watching the empty barrel begin its journey back down onto me.
> This explains the two broken legs.
>
>  I hope this answers your inquiry."
> Tony C.
>
>


I spoke with Bid/Ask's lead lawyer Sam Baxter earlier today about getting
together in person to have an off-the-record "settlement discussion" where
we would try to persuade him to drop his suit because we do not infringe. He
suggested Friday morning. If you want me to attend, we have to do it early
so I can catch my SW flight to Houston for the Halliburton docket call.
Please let me know your availability on Friday, and if not then, when.

Also, Dr Phil MCGraw ("Dr Phil" on the Oprah show) and his company Courtroom
Sciences is on board for witness prep and jury consulting - if we want to
use them. He has been told that ENRON may prefer someone it has worked with
previously, so let me know.
                                         ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
	06/07/2001 10:37 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Martha Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Bruck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt,
Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate, Connie
Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret
Doucette/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron,
Samantha Ferguson/NA/Enron@Enron, Nita Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W
Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Lauterbach/NA/Enron@Enron, Legal Temp 5/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp
6/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 7/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl
Lindeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, MaryHelen
Martinez/NA/Enron@Enron, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Majed Nachawati/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou
Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name: Mark E. Taylor

Login ID:  mtaylo1

Extension:  37459

Office Location:  EB3892

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop,  Laptop,  Both)  Laptop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None, IPAQ, Palm Pilot,
Jornada)  None

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  Yes - calendars
    If yes, who?  Our entire group accesses each others' calendars

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  Yes
    If yes, who?  My entire group has access to my calendar, my assistant has
access to my e-mail

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  No
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  My assistant
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  No
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  No
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:
Financial Trading Agreements, ECT Legal Foreign & Domestic Counsel, European
Jursidictional Document Library, ENA Legal Online Trading Agreements,
Jurisdiction Document Library, Enron Net Works Idea Bank

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:  8:30    To:  7:30

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc?
No       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


I love you


Job ID:  J12746KM
Job Title:  Attorney
Location:  Houston, Texas USA
Compensation:  $60000 - 70000

Description:
Our client is a small law firm that is looking for an individual to join their team handling toxic tort with some minor PI defense. They offer an exceptional compensation package including a healthy salary, comprehensive benefits program, and ample room for associates to grow within the firm. KM

Requirements:
You'll be able to use your 1-4 years of experience with Toxic Tort to complement your desire to stay with the firm.

Company:
Marvel Consultants, Inc.
28601 Chagrin Blvd.
Cleveland, Ohio 44122 USA

Email: recruiters@marvelconsultants.com <mailto:recruiters@marvelconsultants.com>
Phone: 216-292-2855
Fax: 216-292-7207


Kay:

Here are my comments to the Opinion of Counsel for Salmon Energy.

Kent

 <<Opinion of Counsel.doc>>

 - Opinion of Counsel.doc


Please find the attached.

Thanks,  Tim


Billy Lemmons & I met on Friday regarding the Analyst and Associate program.  We would like to implement the following action items as it relates to the program.  Let me know if you have any concerns or questions with the items below:

Action Plan
Halt all recruiting efforts
Rescind offers with start dates thru end of February 2002
No change (as of now) with offers starting Summer 2002
Complete several internal transfers into program - stop all future internal transfers into program
Immediately cut 4 and 5 rated Associates and Analysts
Reduce remainder of group consistent with commercial organizations
Roll A/A program into HR reporting to David Oxley
Reduce administrative staff significantly

Current Program
Approximately 520 A/A in Western Hemisphere, with 35 staff
Approximately 225 A/A in Eastern Hemisphere, with 9 staff


did she reply?  make sure they still aren't in high school.


[IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  		 [IMAGE]  	 [IMAGE]
  Hello,     		 [IMAGE]  	 [IMAGE]
	  Are  past credit problems restricting you from getting a credit card?  Life would be so much easier if you had that credit card for making  purchases on the Internet, renting a car, or even making hotel  reservations. It's  Fast, Easy & Free to apply!    No Deposits Required  Rebuild or Re-Establish Your  Credit  NO CREDIT,  BAD CREDIT, NO PROBLEM!  [IMAGE]      	 [IMAGE]  	 [IMAGE]


Per my earlier email, are we trying to get Koch Hydrocarbon Co. changed to
reflect the legal entity as part of the counterparty name?


Yes - Sorry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kishkill, Joe
Sent:	Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Re:

I assume Sao Paulo is by video conference as well...kind of obvious, but just clarifying

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 04:29 PM CDT
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Beck/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Glen Devries/ENRON@enronxgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Hello everyone.

In December we decided to kill our planned offsite due to market volatility.  Louise and I would like to get everyone together offsite, probably in late June (once Louise is back from holiday (just kidding)).  I think it's time to go have a little fun with the group driving Enron's success.

I would like suggestions as to:

1)  Where to go.

2)  What should be the focus of the business meetings.

3)  Should we have business meetings or should we do something else (ie. climb a mountain)?  I'm not a strong bid on climbing a mountain.

4)  And any other ideas you have.

In addition I would like to start having staff meetings about once a month.  The first one will be Friday May 11th at 2:30 p.m.  Please add this to your schedule.  I have invited everyone who has P/L responsibility.  Portland, Calgary and Toronto will have to be on Video or Phone conference.

Regards

John


I am negotiating the master.  Do you have the credit info for me to tuck in
from Rudwell?
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 11:41 AM -----

	Rudwell Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 05:26 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: Master Agreement - enovate LLC - Constellation Power (Revised
Dra ft)

Hi Debra!

As per our conversation, attached is Constellation Power's comments to the
Master Firm agreement they received from
Roy Rodriguez.  I will be happy if you can review this.  Additionally, as
soon as I come to some agreement with their credit group regarding threshold
and MACs, I will draft a credit worksheet and forward same to you.

Thanks
Rudwell.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "McGilloway, Vangie" <Vangie.McGilloway@constellation.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22McGilloway+2C+20Vangie+22+20+3CVangie+2EMcGilloway+40con
stellation+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May  30, 2001 11:01 AM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Master Agreement - enovate LLC - Constellation Power (Revised Dra ft)

Rudwell- Pursuant to our discussion, attached please find a revised draft of
the Enfolio Agreement between CPS and enovate LLC.  The form of agreement is
the original one used by Enron and edited accordingly for enovate LLC.

The edits proposed (as submitted to enovate back in January) are consistent
with industry standards and according to my notes were being forwarded to
enovate's Legal (Enron) for further review.   We are continuing contact and
discussions to this matter with Roy Rodriguez at enovate and hope we can put
closure to this agreement in the very near future.

Regards,
Vangie McGillloway
Constellation Power Source, Inc.
Phone 410-468-3798
Fax 410-468-3499
Email vangie.mcgilloway@powersrc.com

 <<enovate -Master Firm Purchase Sale Agreement(rev 1-jan 15).doc>>

 - enovate -Master Firm Purchase Sale Agreement(rev 1-jan 15).doc


Russell:
That works for me.
Carol

	"Martinson, Russell" <RMartins@UtiliCorp.com>
	05/16/2000 05:21 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Utilicorp

I agree with you.  I had thought about waiting to execute the Transfer
Agreement until after we had executed the new ISDA and (and thus were doing
all subsequent trades as UtiliCorp) and dating the Transfer Agreement
accordingly.  I think it is a more legally sound way of handling the whole
issue.  Why don't you wait until I send you the fully executed ISDA and we
have the correct name in your Enron Online database, and then redate and
send the Transfer Agreement?

> ----------
> From:  Carol.St.Clair@enron.com[SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
> Sent:  Tuesday, May 16, 2000 3:46 PM
> To:  RMartins@UtiliCorp.com
> Cc:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
> Subject:  RE: Utilicorp
>
>
> Russell:
> Thanks for your message.  I will take a look at the Transfer Agreement.  I
> just want to make sure that all trades done after May 3rd and before the
> execution date that are being confirmed under ARMS will be transferred to
> Utilicorp.  Alos, in order to change our online system, we need to know
> when the Utilicorp Master will be the operative document so that on and
> after such date, all deals are confirmed under the Master under the
> Utilicorp name.  Do you think that it would be better just to change the
> effective date of the Master and the Transfer Agreement to the date of
> Utilicorp's execution of the Master?
>
>
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3892
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
>
>
>
>
>                     "Martinson,
>
>                     Russell"              To:     "'Carol St Clair'"
> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
>                     <RMartins@Util        cc:
>
>                     iCorp.com>            Subject:     RE: Utilicorp
>
>
>
>                     05/16/2000
>
>                     02:05 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Carol, I wasn't able to open the images you attached to your email, but
> both
> the ISDA and the Transfer and Termination Agreement are dated May 3, 2000.
> The only possible concern would be those transactions that we are entering
> into between May 3 and the day that the UtiliCorp ISDA is executed, at
> which
> time we will actually enter into trades as UtiliCorp.  However, I believe
> that we have worded the Transfer and Termination Agreement in such a
> manner
> that, once such document is executed, all trades done as ARM will fall
> under
> the UtiliCorp ISDA, so there shouldn't be any concerns.
>
> I anticipate having the ISDA Transfer and Termination Agreement executed
> within the week.  Feel free to let me know if you you have further
> questions/concerns.
>
> > ----------
> > From:   Carol St Clair[SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Friday, May 12, 2000 5:05 PM
> > To:     RMartins@utilicorp.com
> > Subject:     Re: Utilicorp
> >
> > <<File: pic07880.pcx>><<File: pic20420.pcx>>
> >
> >
> > Russell:
> > Please see the e-mails that Susan and I have exchanged.  Since we are
> > still
> > confirming deals under ARMS, does the effective date on the Transfer and
> > Termination Agreement work?  I want to make sure that it covers all
> trades
> > that
> > have been confirmed with ARMS until we start confirming with Utilicorp.
> > Please
> > advise.
> > Carol
> >
> > Carol St. Clair
> > EB 3892
> > 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> > 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> > ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 05:03 PM -----
> > |--------+------------------------>
> > |        |          Susan Bailey  |
> > |        |                        |
> > |        |          05/12/2000    |
> > |        |          05:00 PM      |
> > |        |                        |
> > |--------+------------------------>
> >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---|
> >   |
> > |
> >   |      To:     Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
> > |
> >   |      cc:
> > |
> >   |      Subject:     Re: Utilicorp(Document link: Carol St Clair)
> > |
> >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---|
> >
> >
> >
> > Carol,
> >
> > Not yet.  The master agreement documents were sent out by FED EX on
> > Monday, May
> > 8th.
> >
> > As for the effective date of the (a) Master Agreement and (b) Transfer
> and
> > Termination Agreement, both documents were given an effective date of
> May
> > 3,
> > 2000.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > |--------+----------------------->
> > |        |          Carol St     |
> > |        |          Clair        |
> > |        |                       |
> > |        |          05/12/2000   |
> > |        |          03:46 PM     |
> > |        |                       |
> > |--------+----------------------->
> >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---|
> >   |
> > |
> >   |       To:     Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
> > |
> >   |       cc:     Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
> > |
> >   |       Subject:     Utilicorp
> > |
> >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---|
> >
> >
> >
> >  (Embedded
> >  image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic20420.pcx)
> >  to file:
> >  pic07880.pcx)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Susan:
> > Has this Master been executed?  I forgot what we specified as the
> > effective date
> > of the Transfer and Assignment Agreement with ARMS but we need to make
> > absolutely sure that the effective date covers all trades that are done
> by
> > ARMS
> > and that there is no gap between that effective date and the effective
> > date of
> > our Master.  Also, please make sure that Tana knows when the Utilicorp
> > Master
> > becomes effective so she can notify the online folks.  Thanks.
> > Carol
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


10/26 to 12/6

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Amy Brashear" <amyb@industrialinfo.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Amy+20Brashear+22+20+3Camyb+40industrialinfo+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 9:53 AM
To:	Philip, Willis
Subject:	Re: AES Somerset

Willis,
I just spoke with Somerset and they confirmed that the Overhaul has been
pushed back until the end of the month.
Outage ID:  16403        Date:  10/26/01 to 12/06/01        655 MW
If you have any further questions please let me know.
Thank you,
Amy Brashear
IIR, Inc.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Willis.Philip@enron.com>
To: <amyb@industrialinfo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: RE: AES Somerset

> please let me know personally when you know something more.  Thanks!
>
> Willis
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Amy Brashear" <amyb@industrialinfo.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Amy+20Brashear+22+20+3Camyb+40industrialinfo+2Ecom+3E+
40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:52 PM
>    To:     Philip, Willis
>    Subject:  Re: AES Somerset
>
>    Willis,
>
>    We called AES Somerset and spoke to one of our contacts.  The outage
>    doesn't
>    look like it is happening this weekend.  It looks like they will do it
>    sometime in October, but not this weekend.  We will continue to call
and
>    we
>    will let you know of any further information that we find.
>
>    Thank you,
>    Amy Brashear
>    IIR , Inc.
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    From: Philip, Willis <Willis.Philip@enron.com>
>    To: <outages@focusmarketing.com>
>    Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:50 PM
>    Subject: AES Somerset
>
>
>    > Can you please confirm that AES Somerset (Allen E Kintigh) unit is
>    > coming down tomorrow, 10/5.  Thank you.
>    >
>    >
>    > Willis Philip
>    > Enron Wholesale Services
>    > East Power Trading
>    > (713) 853-0961
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
**********************************************************************
>    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate
>    and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
>    the
>    intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>    others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
>    authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>    reply
>    to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>    all
>    copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>    intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence
>    a
>    binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>    affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>    be
>    relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
>    Thank you.
>    >
**********************************************************************
>    >
>
>


still have not received credit for funds wired 11/16.  Please advise.

World Sports Exchange <wsx@wsex.com> on 10/19/2000 06:15:50 AM
Please respond to wsx@wsx.wsex.com
To: jarnold@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: (no subject)

Hi,

If you sent a bank wire on Monday then it should take about 2-3 days to
be credited to your account, but sometimes it takes one or two days
longer.  So, if you don't see it today, please give us a call at 888 304
2206 and ask for either Maria or Juliette in the accounts department and
they will assist you.

Thanks,

WSEX

jarnold@ect.enron.com wrote:

> Hello:
> I have not yet received credit for a $1500 wired on Monday for account
> "Lavorato"


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/03/2000 11:43 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	09/03/2000 11:41 AM

		 To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: AEP

Joe--  How long can we hold off on this? I have left a message for Dan
Watkiss to call me about helping us with an anti-trust analysis. Maybe you
should also be on that call.


Greetings Ms Dotty.  Hope you've managed to stay a night or two in your house
recently.  Do you think that it would be OK to call your cousin in Sea
Ranch?  I have some carpentry work I'd like done on my property (panel
interior of cabin; build deck and gazebo) and thought I might get him, or
someone who works for/with him, or someone he could recommend to help me
out.  If you think he wouldn't mind having me call, might you have his phone
number (and full name)?  As always, greatly appreciated.

FYI:  Just talked to the guy from UC Davis who's in the field for Mendocino
County.  He says that by the sound of it, my property just might end up being
vine-friendly!

All the best,
Jeff


Sara,

I'm sorry, but I'm still awaiting word on the Cargill, Inc. guarantee
of
Cargill-Alliant, which was in the hands of our Credit Manager for a
final
once-over.  (Unless they've by-passed me?  Have you seen a revised copy
of
this guarantee?)

I also need that same Credit Mgr. to give his final nod of approval to
the
Set-Off language you'd put into the last draft.  Our Legal only had on
a
couple of minor comments on it.

Thanks for the follow-up!  I intend to press hard this week for a final
response so we can at last get this wrapped up.

Mara Alexander
Sr. Documentation Analyst
Cargill, Incorporated
Tel: 952.984.3417
Fax: 952.984.3872
e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:45 PM
To: alexander, mara /xtwn
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement

Mara:  Are we done?  I don't think we have heard from you about the
master?
Can we go ahead and have the guaranty executed?  I don't think we have
any
outstanding issues.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Hi Katie,  I am feeling good about status of the deals!  Looks like we should
close next Wednesday.  So as it stands now, I don't think I will have to work
this weekend.  Of course now that I just said that, it almost positive that
something will come up.

Hmmm,  Actually work might not be such a bad thing as my alternative is
helping my roommate pack his stuff up for his move to North Carolina.

Have a great weekend! Talk to you soon.

Gerald


Thanks for your note.  Of the three you have listed, #1643 is probably a bit
far from public transport for me.  #1671 is convenient to the business I have
on Mon. & Tues. (what is Double SS?).  #1966 sounds like a fun location.  I'd
be willing to spend more for a place that is particularly well furnished or
interesting (any loft spaces?).

"anne" <anne@nyurbanventures.com> on 10/20/99 12:39:47 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Apartment rental

Apt. # 1643: THE CHRYSLER BUILDING IS FRAMED IN YOUR WINDOWS. THE TUDOR
BUILDINGS ARE
STRIKING W OWN PARK & SECURITY. CUL DE SAC STREET SO NO TRAFFIC NOISES.
QUEEN MURPHY BED.
  AT E41ST ST & 1ST AVE  $125 PER NITE  $2,050 MONTH

Apt. # 1671: FOUR EMPTY CLOSETS, MIRRORS ON 3 WALLS. QUEEN BED IN BEDRM&
DOUBLE SS AND AN
 ADDRESS THAT PUTS YOU RIGHT IN THE THEATER DISTRICT. DOORMAN, ELEVATOR AT
W55 & 9TH AVE.
 $140 PER NIGHT, $170-3

Apt. # 1966: THIS NYER IS RUNNING A RESTAURANT IN RUSSIA.  SO, YOU ARE THE
LUCKY
RECIPIANT OF THIS STUDIO WITH WOOD BURNING FIREPLACE. TRUNDLE BEDS.
ELEVATOR. ATGROVE
NEAR  BEDFORD.$1,850 PER MONTH $130/NT


Dear Sara,

... yes we are still going on this - I hope you had a nice holiday in
California after the Legal Conference.  I really enjoyed meeting and chatting
with you on the Thursday evening.

We are almost done - with our office opening and all the other Enron things
which have been going on over the last week together with the Japan ISDA
seminar series - all parties got a bit distracted ... but just a few more
questions I think.

1. When we spoke over the phone some time ago, you noted that there is no
submission to jurisdiction clause in the draft we used and were going to
check with Mark H. whether this was because we were happy to have exclusive
NY jurisdiction.  I wonder what you think about his now, do we need to make
an amendment before we finalize the agreement?

2. You were going to check the Waiver of Jury Trial provision they want to
include against Enron's form of clause.  Was it OK?

Thanks Sara.

Jane

Jane McBride
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Japan Corp.

Otemachi 1st Square Bldg.
West 11th Floor
1-5-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Japan

URL:        www.enron.co.jp

Tel.:       81-3-5219-4500 (Main)
            81-3-5219-4553 (Direct)
Fax:        81-3-5219-4510

Assistant (Maggy Yamanishi)
Tel.:       81-3-5219-4554
Email:      Yo.Yamanishi@enron.com


I would like to spend 20 min with you today.  I need to update my Gas Daily
buy/sells for December and I would like for you to see it.  It takes me about
10 min a day to do.


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: MIKE KARP
on STORAGE IN THE ENTERPRISE
11/20/01 - Today's focus: A snapshot of change

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Storage in bite-sized chunks
* Links related to storage
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by Cisco

Learn how Cisco Optical and Storage Networking Solutions enable
customers to obtain Network Resiliancy with a broader
deployment of disaster recovery applications, an efficient
high-performance storage transport, storage consolidation with
high availability, and off-site backup and fast recovery--all
over an ultra-high bandwidth, intelligent optical
infrastructure capable of supporting any packet on any
wavelength from any platform.

For more information: http://nww1.com/go/3610952a.html
_______________________________________________________________
TAKE IT OFF-LINE

The high-tech industry has always run at breakneck pace. Even a
wheezing economy will hardly slow it. In the past year,
business theory surrounding technology has been reinvented and
redefined multiple times. Check out the latest "must-read"
books for technology-related business theories.
http://nww1.com/go/ad204.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: A snapshot of change

By Mike Karp

My friend Roberto, who has been working in IT shops since
computers ran on coal, brought me a beer and began to vent.
"It's the tapes," he said. "They're taking over the place!"

Now I know this guy pretty well, and I know he is a chronic
complainer. But I also know he's got more experience than
almost anyone, and he's very much a "go-to guy" when the bit
hits the fan. Ultimately, two things caught my interest. First,
Roberto was taking a shot at tape backups, and I'm always
interested in hearing about the shortcomings of tape. And
second, this guy almost never buys the beer, so he must have
felt this was pretty serious.

"We make backups of everything. And then what happens? We
label the tapes, and stuff them away in metal file cabinets. We
must have a mile of file cabinets, each drawer filled with bar-
coded digital linear tapes. Don't ask what happens when we have
to do a recovery." One look at my friend and I knew not to do
the obvious. At this point Roberto shook his head and went over
to get two more.

"The real problem," he said on his return, "is that we back
up just about everything. Useful data and junk data. Database
tables and MPEGs. If it's on a disk, we save it. And the e-mail
is the worst. Do you have any idea how much it costs us just to
backup e-mail?" At this point, I think he actually groaned.

Well, Roberto works for a huge manufacturing company, and I
admit I haven't a clue as to what it costs his company to back
up its e-mail. On the other hand, I've been using e-mail for 20
years or so, so I at least have some context in which to think
about it. Which I did.

My first step was to do a reality check, which showed me that I
am part of the problem. My own inbox currently contains 504
items, including 192 that are unread, and when I sort on the
"created" field, I find some of my mail goes back to July. By
almost anyone's standards, as far as e-mail is concerned I am
not a very good citizen. Fortunately my IT manager, a good guy
if there ever was one, provides me with all the data protection
I need.

My thinking is this. A sound backup rotation, with tapes
regularly moving to offsite storage, plus an up-to-date logbook
in a fireproof safe, will make locating the correct tape fairly
easy. The trick, of course, is to keep the log current. All
this is pretty obvious, but I wonder how many of you actually
document the content and movement of each tape?

But what if you need to do more than just document the problem
of tape glut? If you want to cure the disease rather than just
treat the symptoms, there are several vendors out there
offering useful solutions.

The main issue, as far as e-mail is concerned, is that the
information store holding all the data is treated by the
application as a monolithic block. Because of this, you can't
do an efficient incremental backup, and even if only a single
message has been changed or corrupted, you still have to back
up the entire file. Potentially, you might have to back up a
5G-byte file to account for a 500K-byte change in the data.

Now, new application-savvy software can help out by providing
snapshotting capabilities for the Exchange (or Notes) Server.
For example, FalconStor (http://www.falconstor.com ) is about to
announce a product that will allow you to set a regimen of timed
snapshots that would provide the functional equivalent of
incremental backups of the e-mail information store.

With snapshots, data is addressed in block rather than file
mode. Thus, you can look for (and save) only those sectors of
the file that show a change. Because your tapes capture only
the blocks containing changed data, less data is transferred
and fewer tapes are needed. The result of hourly snapshots
might be 24 files of 2M-bytes each, rather than a single daily
backup of the whole multigigabyte file. And to make my friend
Roberto happy, it could all be captured on a single tape.

Unless you are media manufacturers, you should like that.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Mike Karp:

Mike Karp is senior analyst with Enterprise Management
Associates (http://www.enterprisemanagement.com) in Boulder,
Colo., an analyst and market research firm focusing exclusively
on enterprise management. He works out of Portsmouth, N.H., and
Westboro, Mass., and can be reached via e-mail at
mailto:mkarp@enterprisemanagement.com
_______________________________________________________________
NW Fusion's BuyIT has the IT resources you need!  Our directory
hosts thousands of qualified service providers.  Post an RFP
anonymously and FREE, receive competitive bids, begin
negotiations, and get your project done right!
http://nwfusion.newmediary.com/nww110901nwltr1
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Archive of the Storage newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/stor/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's The Edge site

Network World Fusion's The Edge is a resource devoted to the
advances in service-provider networks that are shaking up the
old telecom order. In classic Network World fashion, we focus
on the hardware, software and services coming to market - but
this time from the vendors targeting legacy carriers, new
alternative local carriers, ISPs and application service
providers. http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com