I sent the draft strategy in yesterday's email to you.  Here is the final
version that we shared with Jeff.  I apologize for any confusion that this
caused.

Lisa

----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001 01:52 PM -----

	Lisa Yoho
	04/10/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Enron's 201 Strategy

Rick and Steve -

Attached is Enron's government affairs strategy with respect to the potential
threat of "201" restrictions on steel imports.   This was developed with the
input of the DC office and outside counsel.  We will be meeting with Eric
Thode later this week to discuss the public relations piece.

Let me know if you have any questions, or if you would like background
information on section 201.

Lisa


Do you have his number?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boots, Kelly H.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:47 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Clayton, Lawrence; Ralph, Susan; Glisan, Ben; Simien, Jimmy; Heineman, Sarah
Subject:	RE: SCB

Rod,

I spoke to Jack Insinga of Standard Chartered yesterday. He specifically needs to speak to someone with Enron who can address the EOTT situation from Enron's perspective.  I told hiim I thought you were the best person for this discussion. We are having a bank meeting next Friday a.m. , November 9th and perhaps sometime prior to that would be a good time to meet.

All of the banks are looking for more information before they will do anything for us so realistically I am not optimistic that BNP Paribas will change their credit view at this time.  Hopefully after the banks have had time to digest the bank meeting information, credit committees will calm down a bit.

Thanks, Kelly

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:14 PM
To:	Boots, Kelly H.
Cc:	Clayton, Lawrence; Ralph, Susan
Subject:	RE: SCB

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ralph, Susan
Sent:	Saturday, December 01, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Clayton, Lawrence
Subject:	SCB

Rod I do not have Kelly Boots e-mail address and am traveling today without a phone directory... but I wanted to share or at least ask that we treat Standard Chartered real nice as we go through this crisis.  These guys are stepping up for us in every way....they (along with ING) are 100% behind us and are putting their money on it.  Also BNP Pays Bas is having an awful time with their credit committee...the business people have approved this and do not feel that Enron's problem effects us but the credit committee is not so forgiving.  If Kelly or anyone can do anything to help Paysbas in this situation it would be greatly appreciated.   My account executive there is Lincoln Payton and Marci Weiss...

Would you be so kind as to pass this along to Kelly or anyone else that you feel appropriate?
----- Forwarded by Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott on 12/01/01 11:19 AM -----

	Josie Castrejana 10/31/01 11:04 AM 	   To: Susan Ralph , Lawrence Clayton/Houston/Eott@Eott  cc:   Subject: SCB

Jack Insigna just called me and he has gotten approval from his credit officer to do:

		Apache
		J. Cleo Thompson
		Newfield Exlporation
		W.C. Miller

jc

Josie Castrejana
Director - Credit/Finance
Ph.: 713/993--5285
Fax: 713/402-2886


Start Date: 4/1/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040108.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: TOSCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  UNIT_ID: UNCHEM_1_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   1.18 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  45.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: DELANO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_8000
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_8000
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  25.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   0.46 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   4.98 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:  45.54 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   2.06 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   7.13 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred: 101.01 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/1/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Sara,

According to Mahesh, the London equity trading agent entity (Enron Investment
Services, "EIS") has been established.  Therefore, once the agency agreement
language between EIS and ECT Investments has been finalized we should be able
to begin trading in London.  Instinet, Autex and ITG/Posit are all very
important to our process and, where necessary, we need to get agreements
between EIS and the vendors executed as soon as possible.  Who will be our
contact in Legal regarding all of these agreements in your absence?

Thanks and regards,
John

From: Sara Shackleton on 10/04/2000 06:32 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Clint
Freeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT,
Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Ellen
Su/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: vacation

I will be on vacation from October 6- 13.  Also, the ENA lawyers will be
offsite October 5 and 6.
Should you need assistance during my absence, please contact my assistant
Kaye Ellis at Ext. 35968 who will direct you to a lawyer.
Thanks.  Sara


Tana,
If at all possible, could you please approve Sabic Americas this morning. I am trying to get this customer an ID by this evening as I will be meeting with him at a conference tommorow.

Thanks,
Jen


An adjustment is required on the Tufco contract for July 2000.  The volume
for the 23rd was overstated by 5,000.  This resulted in revisions on the 23rd
and 28th.  Please see the attached Tufco.  If you have any questions, give me
a call @ 36905.

D


YOU BET.  I'm going to work out after work, go home, get comfy clothes, go by
Walgreen's for drugs, pick up a "guy" movie, then drop by the immer palace.

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 05/11/2001 01:45:16 PM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Can I make you soup for dinner tonight, if I promise it has meat in it?


----> Send4fun: Too much time on the Internet?

Hello! Hope you are having a Great Day, and hope you enjoy these Funpages!

I Want to Make you Smile!
http://www.send4fun.com/makeyousmile.htm

Make you Smile!

The ABC's of Friendship
http://www.send4fun.com/abc.htm

The ABC's of Friendship

A Bouquet for You!
http://www.send4fun.com/bouquet.htm

A Bouquet for You!

Get the latest bestsellers, self-help, and health books from Doubleday Book
Club
.  Join today and get 5 books for 99? plus an extra book free.  Click
for details.
http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=9307
AOL Link

**Take the blind out of dating...meet online at Cupid Junction, the Internet's fastest growing dating community.
http://www.cupidjunction.com/index.cfm?cjtr=004
AOL Link

Skeleton Jokes
http://www.send4fun.com/skeletonjokes.htm

Skeleton Jokes!

What happens when the Doctor spends too much time on the Internet?
http://www.send4fun.com/timeoninternet.htm

Too much time on the internet

Attention all poets! Visit Poetry.com for your chance to win $58,000 in prizes! http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=9308
AOL Link

Funny Female Comebacks!
http://www.gotlaughs.com/funpages/comeback.cfm

AOL Link

Priceless Gift
http://www.bigfatbaby.com/newfun/pricelessgift.cfm

AOL Link

FreeCardSearch-- The #1 FREE Credit Card Matching Service
http://www.flowgo.com/page.cfm?a=9309
AOL Link

Have a Great Day!
------

Send 4 Fun is a FlowGo newsletter.  For more information on FlowGo or to unsubscribe from Send 4 Fun follow the links below:

FlowGo
http://www.flowgo.com/

Privacy Policy
http://flowgo.com/privacy.html

Unsubscribe

http://www.flowgo.com/unsub.cfm?sid=2746140&u=-9625&l=13&m=10791

Unsubscribe


I am open, just let me know when and where.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton
	02/02/2001 04:24 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Canada - confirmation desk

Mary:

Melissa Murphy (financial power) will be in Calgary next week (Tues - Fri)
assisting the confirm desk.  I thought it would be helpful if you and I
scheduled a short meeting with Melissa on Monday to discuss desk issues.
What is your schedule like on Monday?

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Rod,
Here is Anne's resume.


Return Receipt

 Your
 document:

 was received Liane Kucher/ST/FIS
 by:

 at:          03:10:28 PM Today


We have been able to secure rooms at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley.  Please
note the confirmation numbers listed below.  Thanks!

Claremont Resort and Spa - Berkeley
41 Tunnel Road
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-843-3000

FROM OAKLAND AIRPORT: Go straight out of the airport on Airport Blvd. Turn
right on Hegenberger Road. From Hegenberger
follow signs for 880 North. Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for Hwy 24
to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning
left at the bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

FROM SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT: Follow signs for Hwy 101 North to San Francisco,
take Hwy 80 East to the Bay Bridge to Oakland.
Cross Bay Bridge on Hwy 80, follow to 580 East, and exit onto HWY 24 to
Berkeley/Walnut Creek.  Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for
Hwy 24 to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning left at the
bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
07:15 PM ---------------------------

Lara Marie Berry
10/10/2000 04:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu
Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Denise
Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Simone Lewis/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

Cal Berkeley
General Presentation
Monday, October 16th

This note is to confirm that you are scheduled to attend the Cal Berkeley
General Presentation on Monday October 16th.  This e-mail should contain any
information that you need to know pertaining to your trip.  Please print out
a hard copy and bring with you in case of emergency.  If you have any
questions, there is a list of contacts listed below.

Once again, thank you for offering to help with technology recruiting at Cal
Berkeley.  See you on campus!

Lara

The General Presentation will be held:

Monday, October 16th
The Faculty Club
Seaborg Room - 2nd Floor
7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
**Please plan on arriving at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.

The General Presentation is designed to educate the students on Enron and the
Global Technology Track.  Following the presentation we will invite the
students to ask questions about Enron and the Global Technology Track.
Please plan to arrive at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.  It is
business casual attire.

FLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS:

You are responsible for scheduling your own flight arrangements with your
preferred airline provider.  Please schedule your flight to arrive to the San
Francisco airport on Monday, October 16th.   Please remember that there can
be significant traffic over the Bay Bridge and to get into town at least an
hour prior to the event.  Please make all flight arrangements through the
Travel Agency in the Park so that we are able to take advantage of discount
fares.  If you do not have a representative that you currently use at the
Travel Agency in the Park - feel free to contact Liz Mendiola at 713-860-1140.

RENTAL CAR ARRANGEMENTS:

Once again, you are responsible for scheduling your own rental car
arrangements with your preferred provider.  Your Travel Agency in the Park
representative should be able to assist you with rental car reservations.

HOTEL ARRANGEMENTS:

Hotel reservations are currently being made by our representative at the
Travel Agency in the Park.

As soon as we have confirmation numbers, I will let you know.

San Francisco Airport to The Faculty Club

Take 101 Northbound
Exit to San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge
Exit to 1-80 East
Exit on University Ave.
East on University Avenue for 1.5 miles to Oxford St.
Right on Oxford St., left on Durant Ave., left on Piedmont
You will see parking on the right side

Once again, thank you so much for helping with the General Presentation.
Below are some last minute tips to keep in mind:

Please remember to dress business casual.
Please remember to bring some business cards for students.
I have attached a pdf version of the Global Technology Track  brochure.
Please forward all expense receipts to Grace Garcia.  She will handle any
expenses incurred for this recruiting trip including: flight costs, hotel,
car, food, valet, etc.  However, you must turn in some sort of receipt - so
be sure and save them!

Ashley Baxter   work:  713-853-3589
    cell:  281-793-0567

Lara Berry   work:  713-345-8320
    cell:  713-857-1034

Grace Garcia   work:  713-853-7252

Simone Lewis   work:  713-853-1645


The EES Business Center will be having an Open House on Thursday, October 25 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.   Please
drop by EB 1090 to learn how the Business Center can be your link to customer solutions!

While visiting, enter our drawing for a chance to win one of our many door prizes.....enjoy some cake and punch too!!

For more information, feel free to contact us at 800-337-7827 or x59390.


Introducing williams2002.com
The official website for Paul Williams Campaign
http://williams2002.com   -- Paul Williams is the Republican candidate for Congress in the 9th congressional district of Texas, which includes Harris, Galveston, Jefferson, and Chambers Counties.  http://williams2002.com  -- please visit the website to learn more about Paul Williams and his position on the issues.  http://williams2002.com  -- please visit the website to make a contribution to Paul's campaign either by credit card, check or money order.


Here's material for this coming Wednesday  night.? Next week we'll be
starting a new series of discussions based on  some concepts discussed in the
book Roaring Lambs by Bob Briner.?  You might want to pick it up and read
through it if interested.
?
Bobby
 - NEON Measuring Success 4.doc


After last weeks volatility in the natural gas market, I think we all agreed
it is imperative that the trading, risk controls, and reporting groups
understand how eack group looks at risk, and how we manage the process.
While our processes are generally good, in times of extreme price and/or
volatility environments, we all could be more coordinated.  It is apparent
now that we must get together to look at all aspects of IT resources and
intraday price risk and VAR management since it seems these are not now, but
should be the same thing.  I would like to set up a meeting regarding these
and other management issues and will be in touch.  I appreciate everyone's
help.
Jeff


Murray,

Sally Beck and Leslie Reeves are both on vacation this week.  Sally will need
to discuss this with Leslie next week when they return to the office and get
back with you then.

Patti Thompson (x39106),
Sally's Assistant

Murray P O'Neil
03/14/2001 07:15 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, TAllen@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: VMS Project Next Steps

All,

It has been a very successful year for the Enron / Razorfish VMS project
Team.  We have been developing a Direct Access Power Market, user managed,
tariff based calculation engine and customer expense / revenue allocation
application.

The efforts which have taken place to date will benefit each of us as we move
forward into these deregulated Direct Access markets.  The current
application has gone through the following evolution:

Project Definition & Design documentation
Database Design / Development
User Interface Design / Development
Communication layer (COM) Design / Development
Hardware requisition / Implementation (Development / Test / Production)
Arthur Anderson Audit (Passed Audit review - Application meets all minimum
requirements)
The Major Functionality / Action Items which have been delivered to date:
Security Management (Only IT Resources to have access)
Event / Task Management & Reporting
Component / Equations Management & Reporting
Estimation Generation Management & Reporting
Counter Party Profile Management & Reporting
Settlement Entity Profile Management & Reporting
Deal-Upload Management & Reporting
Integrated Dispute Management & Reporting
Customer Generation Charge Profile & Reporting
Historical Data Conversion mechanism
95 % of Calculation Engine Original Functional Requirements

The Major Functionality which is under it's final steps of Development and
User Test
Reconciliation (Exception Identification, Allocation & Reporting)
Settlement Entity - Settlement Statement / Invoice Parsing & Reporting
Remaining 5% of Calculation Engine Functionality

Over the past 12+ months a total of $3 MM dollars has been spend on VMS.  We
are reaching the final phase of this project and I am not sensing that
everyone is still on board with this being OUR (Enron) Volume Management
strategic solutions for Direct Access Power Markets.

As of March 1, 2001 we no longer have a contract in place with Razorfish.
Razorfish has provided six developers dedicated to assist the Enron Networks
IT staff in delivering the VMS solution over the past year.  These resources
have been key in helping us get to where we are today.  In addition we had
originally planned to retain these resources over the remainder of 2001
(03/2001 - 12/2001) to assist with the implementation of VMS on the West &
East Desk and in the Toronto Canada office.  Without a contract in place and
currently working on good faith.  The project has come to a serious point of
action.  Razorfish is asking for a total of $728,000 for services rendered
between 3/1/2001 and 6/30/2001.  They will keep the resources dedicated to
the project and will deliver the following:
Finalise base product development, assist in unit / user testing and
Implement base VMS Product in Production.
Application Production Support for 30 Days post Implementation
Transition of knowledge base from Razorfish resources to Enron Networks IT
resources

Razorfish is willing to discuss terms to assist Enron throughout the
remainder of the year.  However,  I don't feel that everyone is ready to make
that decision.  We do however need to make a final decision on this first
implementation.

As I have stated prior in this document,  "We have accomplished a lot over
the past year."  Without the continued assistance from the Razorfish portion
of the VMS team.  I don't see any of us meeting our 2001 Volume Management
(VM) Direct Access Power Market objectives in a more efficient or economical
fashion.  In some cases I don't see it being possible at all.

It is time to make a decision.  Do we all agree that we need to move forward
and retain Razorfish services for the additional $728,000 and incur each of
OUR allocation of the over all VMS capitalised project total cost or do we
stop where we are and find other solution to address our needs and debate
over who was in agreement in the beginning of the project in order to
determine who picks up the $3 MM already spent.

Please provide me with your response by 5:00 PM PT to allow me to get back to
Razorfish with a well deserved response by Friday.

Thanks - MO


Do I owe you any other lists?


When: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: 2945

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This meeting is set up on behalf of Shari Mao.


As promised, here is a picture of Elizabeth and John Linnell's son, Mark Ian.

 - Dsc00138.jpg


Attached is the statement we are using in response to the Maharashtra/Indian
government's invitation to meet to renegotiate.  We plan to decline requests
to elaborate.

John


http://home.earthlink.net/~goodspeeds/ADS.HTM

                          \\\|///
                        \\  - -  //
 _____                   (  @ @  )                   _____
( ___ )----------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo----------------( ___ )
 |   |                                               |   |
 | / |  Jeffrey Oh          | / |
 | / |  Enron North America  503.464.7789          | / |
 | / |  121 SW Salmon Street   503.464.3740 (fax)    | / |
 | / |  3WTC0306    jeffrey.oh@enron.com  | / |
 | / |  Portland, OR 97204                           | / |
 | / |            | / |
 |___|                 .oooO                         |___|
(_____)--------------- (   )-- Oooo. ---------------(_____)
                        \ (    (   )
                         \_)    ) /
                               (_/


This message is from Tammy Hopkins.


Bridgette:

So long as there is a copy of the notice in the appropriate files then I do
not need to see it.  I would suggest sending a copy to Tana Jones in the
financial trading group in the event there is a financial trading master.

Thanks,

Jeff

	Bridgette Anderson@ENRON
	05/01/2001 01:51 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Notice of Telephone Recording

Jeff,

I recieved a notification from CMS Field Services, Inc. indicating that
effective 5/15/01 they will begin recording purchase, sale and derivative
transactions for natural gas between our companies.  I have sent a copy to
the fileroom, should I forward a copy to you also?  I spoke with one of the
Adminative Assistants on the Trading floor and they thought that I should
contact Legal.  Please advise.

Regards,

Bridgette Anderson
ENW_Global Contracts
Phone: 713-853-3818
Fax:       713-646-5971
bridgete.anderson@enron.com


Thanks.  Not impressive.
mike


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sayre, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 6:14 PM
To:	Heard, Marie; St. Clair, Carol; Cook, Mary
Cc:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Hendry, Brent; Shackleton, Sara; Bailey, Susan; Panus, Stephanie; Boyd, Samantha; Jones, Tana; Heard, Marie; Keiser, Holly
Subject:	Amerada Hess and Carolina Power & Light Update

Last Friday, Amerada Hess opted to proceed first with getting the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and Amerada Hess Corporation ("AHC") completed before addressing the Master Netting Agreement, which they believe is subject to fraudulent transfer issues, etc.  The following has occurred:

a.	Enron Corp. multiproduct guaranty in amount of $75,000,000 executed and sent to AHC on 10/29/01, as was Certificate of Incumbency attesting to authority of Mary Perkins to  sign the guaranty;

b. 	Initial draft of our comments to AHC's form Schedule was sent to AHC on 10/30/01;

c.	Draft Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex received from AHC on 11/2/01;

d.	Assignment and Novation of Transactions document agreeing to assignment of financial trades previously done by Hess Energy Services Company, LLC ("HESCO") to AHC executed and sent to AHC for execution on 11/2/01;

e. 	First Amendment to Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC ("HETCO") ISDA Master Agreement setting collateral threshold for both parties at $5,000,000 executed and sent to HETCO by fax on 11/2/01; originals were sent to Hess for execution of 11/5/01;

f.	Conference call with Chuck Cerria and Dana Dellacona to review Schedule;

g.	 Letter agreement agreeing to assignment of physical gas trades previously done by Hess Energy Services to AHC executed and sent returned to AHC on 11/6/01;

h.	Received request on 11/6/01 from Chuck Cerria at AHC to look at form of Assignment and Novation of Transactions document used for HESCO assignment for use in assigning all of AHC's financial trades to HETCO.  Reviewed document and, after confirming that I did not have any authority to sign off on the documents or the structure of the assignment until after I received the approval of Bill Bradford and our credit group, I told Mr. Cerria that they looked ok to me but probably would have to be expanded to include a statement that the transactions in question would fall under HETCO ISDA Master Agreement.  Mr. Cerria is amending the documents accordingly;

i.	On 11/6/01 sent rough draft of mark-up of Paragraph 13 to Credit Support Annex to Dana Dellacona with caveat that ENA credit had not reviewed the document, the document was being sent merely to expedite the ISDA negotiation process and the document was subject to change by ENA after credit review; also worked through it with Dana and John Butala.  Dana will be redrafting it and sending a new draft;

j.	Received redraft of Schedule to ISDA from Dana Dellacona for review during afternoon of 11/6/01.

I have told everyone at AHC that I will be out of the office on 11/7/01 but can be reached until 11:30 am at my home [(713) 942-0007].  Copies of all of the above (except item "f") are on my desk in a file marked "Hess" and any documents I've drafted are on a disk marked "Hess" or in my email files (Holly can get into these).


Lin:
Yes, that's right the Confirmation Reply per your earloier request remains as
is.  My fax number is 713-646-3393.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

	"Reece, Lin" <Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com>
	06/14/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "McGough, Scott" <Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>
		 Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Thanks so much.  I'm sending your revisions to Scott for review.  The
Confirmation Reply has been totally red lined out of these attachments, but
I am assuming that it remains as we originally designed it.  Please advise
if this is not correct.  If your changes are accepted, I will print a copy
and have Scott McGough execute it.  Please give me your fax number so that I
can fax it to you.  Regards, Lin Reece

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:13 PM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: RE: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed is a revised letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:     "McGough, Scott"
<Scott.McGough@SouthernEnergy.Com>,

"'larry.joe.hunter@enron.com'" <larry.joe.hunter@enron.com>
                    06/14/2000 11:21 AM         Subject:     RE:
CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Dear Carol,    We do not want to create an agreement specfic coversheet for
each counterparty.  Is there some way to put language in the body of the
letter agreement to address your concerns.  The procedure we are proposing
is intended to supplement current requirements in the ISDA, not replace
them.  If you feel that additional definition needs to be added to the
confirmation process, shouldn't we put that definition in the letter
agreement rather than on the cover sheet?

Our goal is to be able to expedite our response to counterparty confirms.
In order to do this we need to have the same cover sheet in place for each
counterparty.  Please call me at 678-579-3378 so that we may discuss
possible solutions.  Thanks, Lin

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 11:12 AM
To: Lin.Reece@SouthernEnergy.Com
Cc: Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com
Subject: Re: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC

Lin:
Enclosed are clean and marked  versions of my redo of the reply letter.

(See attached file: Southern Confirm Letter 2 RED.DOC)(See attached file:
Southern Confirm Letter 2.DOC)
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

                    "Reece, Lin"

                    <Lin.Reece@SouthernE        To:
"'carol.st.clair@enron.com'" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.Com>                  cc:

                                                Subject:     CONFIRMATION
COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC
                    06/13/2000 02:25 PM

 <<CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC>>

Carol,  Please feel free to change the letter agreement.  The coversheet
needs to remain as it is, because we are using this same sheet for all
counterparties.  Thanks, Lin

(See attached file: CONFIRMATION COVERSHEET PROCESS LTR.DOC)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  EBS
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 AM
Outage:  OSSPROD Server Move - Portland to Houston (EBS)
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: ECOMS is the EBS order management system. It is a mission ciritical
app, and the server is being moved to Houston.
Oracle does not function in a NAT environment, so network changes must be
made to accomodate the move.
Backout: Put original ACL back in place
Contact(s):  Dennis McGough    713-345-3143

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Unify Server Name Changes
Environments Impacted:  Unify Development
Purpose: Full complinace with naming standard.
Backout: A full backup of the servers and Emergency Repair disk will be done
prior to the name change.
Contact(s):  Charles Ballmer    713-853-0684
  Darryl Vinson        713-345-8726

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


On Transwestern for the 28th:

At the El Paso Interconnect with Citizens 1832 Mmbtu's will be scheduled for the day.

If you have any questions, please call me.
Thanks,
Amy


Please put Steve Marland's Cell number in my Address Book.
-----Original Message-----
From: Herndon, Rogers
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Cc: Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject: Steve Marland

Kevin -

Just an FYI - Steve Marland resigned from Reliant very recently.  Steve had been trading their term Midwest book and has previously covered the SE I believe.  I think Steve is a good trader, played the regional/time spreads very effectively, and is not afraid to put size on when appropriate.  I just think that Reliant's management team is "old school" and Steve was not being able to effectuate the changes he saw necessary (apparently, they would not even let him trade NG against his positions).

Steve just wanted to clear his head and get away.  He is looking at the opportunities everyone else is at the moment and is not in a rush.  I know he wants to work with a bright group that thinks the way he does.  I have told him that he should talk to you guys.  You may want to contact him directly when you have the green light to look outside ENE.  I have known Steve for awhile and think he could be a good fit - I think Fletch has met him and dealt with him in the markets as well.

Steve's cell number is 713-962-0274.  I know he would like to talk to UBS.

RH


Wanda:  I faxed the examples that Edison faxed us and that you and Michael and I talked about some time back.  I'm sure that's how Edison would calculate it.  Does it make sense to run the numbers and see what our "contribution" to Edison's undercollection would be under Edison's view?  If you need another copy, let me know.  Question:  I don't know what our book looks like on this issue, but if we were to take the "netting" through a reduction in the PX credit going forward, how much of a hit would that be, particularly if we were to get the $120 MM up front?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Jeff --

How would we calculate EES' "contribution" to SCE undercollection?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

I talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:

They plan to "settle" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.
Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.
He said that they will propose to net it out in one of two ways:  1) lump sum netting (i.e., if they owe $50MM and the share of the undercollection is $30 MM, then they pay the ESP $20 MM; or 2) future reductions in PX Credit (i.e., they pay the ESP $50 MM, and then reduce the PX going forward until the $30 MM is paid down).  The numbers are illustrative only.
In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)
I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.
He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison "meet and confer" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.
Fielder is also the point person on "getting ESPs paid" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.
It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.

If you have any questions, let us know.

Best,
Jeff


Thersa,
I recalculated the August invoice and I am still coming up with a difference
between your invoice and my calculations.  The difference for August is
$18,713.96.  I am issuing a adjustment for the $18,713.96.  So, when the
funds are transferred to Enron, there will be two transactions that will net
$794,486.45.
Also, I am not paying the additional $10,210.77 PPA for July.  When you
revise July's invoice, I will pay based on the revised invoice.
I will take the invoices down to Accounting tomorrow after they have been
approved.  John is out today, but will be back in the office tomorrow.  I
will try to expedite payment tomorrow.
Can you please forward this to Valerie?

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Staab, Theresa [mailto:Theresa.Staab@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:30 PM
To: robert.poole@atmosenergy.com; Vela, Valerie
Subject: Revised August

Robert, Valerie,

I have revised the fuel percent from .0107 to .0078.  Please call me if
you have any questions.

Thanks,
Theresa

(I will start working on correcting all prior months and get an
adjustment out soon.)

 <<Greeley Gas August 01 Revised 9-24.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Thanks so much, Willie!

	From:  Willie Harrell                           04/05/2001 09:29 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New Pub Code

I have already began posting rates (4/1/2001) for this pub code.  wlh


In This order issued Wednesday, FERC rejects the PX An=mendment No 22 and ISO
Amendment No 36 in part and makes very strong statements about the need to
have creditworthy parties for bilateral deals.  Only allows utilities to
schedule their own resources to meet their own loads, or otherwise to have
"support" from a creditworthy party.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 11:35 PM -----

	Gary Ackerman <foothill@lmi.net>
	02/14/2001 04:08 PM
	Please respond to foothill

		 To: Bill Ross <billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>,
Carolyn Baker <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, CHARLES A MIESSNER
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, Corby Gardin <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, curt
hatton <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Denice Cazalet Purdum <dpurdum@apx.com>,
Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Jack Pigott <jackp@calpine.com>, Janie Mollon
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, "Klemstine, Barbara A(F56661)"
<barbara_klemstine@apses.com>, Nam Nguyen <Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, Randy
Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
Rob Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger
Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>, Sue Mara <smara@enron.com>, Jeff Crowe
<jcrowe@apx.com>, George Vaughn <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, Al Parsons
<alp@ncpa.com>, Bob Low <Bob_Low@transalta.com>, Bob Reilley
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>, Brian Jobson <bjobson@smud.org>, Dave Nuttall
<dn@ui.com>, Duane Nelsen <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, Edmond Chang
<echang@wapa.gov>, Elaine Walsh <Elaine@citizenspower.com>, Ken Lackey
<Kenneth_Lackey@EdisonMission.com>, Linda Hamilton
<lhamilton@avistaenergy.com>, Mark Tallman <mark.tallman@pacificorp.com>,
"Richard H. Counihan" <counihan@greenmountain.com>, Sheryl Lambertson
<sslambertson@pplmt.com>, Steve Ponder <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, Tom Breckon
<tom@ncpa.com>, "Wolfe, Don - PGSO-5" <dvwolfe@bpa.gov>, John Marchand
<jpmarchand@aep.com>, Mark Ward <mward@ladwp.com>, "Morrato, Joe"
<Joe.Morrato@xemkt.com>, Dan Douglass <douglass@arterhadden.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Affirms Generators' Claims

Came out today.  Hurry. Read, read, read.
gba

 - er01-889-000.pdf


Pat,  Could you please print the attached docs for me and also save them in
my directory under the Generation Barges folder.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 05:46 PM -----

	Scott A Monson
	05/15/2000 05:22 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Mooring Facility Construction

Gerald:

All the following are working documents since we have no executed agreement
with LIPA or any other entity at this stage.

Here is the LD information from the PPA:

Here's the force majeure section:

Here's our initial permit working document parts of which may be directed to
EE&CC. For now assume the entire list is our responsibility.

Here's an initial cut at scope and a draft materials list:

Utility coordination is a bit of a mixed bag because we have to work with
LIPA on transmission issues and KeySpan on site access and demineralized
water supply issues. KeySpan is also LIPA's contractor for transmission
operations. We are hoping to structure a management services agreement with
KeySpan where they would provide mooring space, interconnections for water
and power as well as operation and maintenance services.

Let me know what else you need. I'll keep you updated as we move closer to
agreement with LIPA/KeySpan.

Scott Monson

Gerald Nemec
05/03/2000 04:53 PM
To: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott A Monson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve  Van Hooser
Subject: Mooring Facility Construction

Attached is a draft of the turnkey construction contract for your review.

Ron,  As we discussed, Exhibit A - Scope of Work will need to be included.
Please note the following points:

1.  Liquidated Damages - Need to assess a value for these damages.
2.  Force Majeure - This would currently provide EE&CC with relief from the
In-Service Date requirements and consequently, the LDs.  Is this acceptable?
3.  Permitting - Need to specify in Exhibit F, those permits that ENA would
secure, and make EE&CC responsible for any others.
4.  Utility Coordination - Currently this is very generally.  Are there
specific responsibilities that should be stated in this Agreement wrt the
Utility?

Please review with these in mind.  I will be out tommorrow and Friday.  Let's
plan on meeting Monday to discuss the draft.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
07:28 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mike A Roberts                           03/14/2001 01:21 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Vince,

maybe we could use this to screen prospective new research group members!

- Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
01:14 PM ---------------------------
Kaye Davenport @ EES   03/14/2001 01:05 PM

To: Bruce N Stram/HOU/EES@EES, <mjacobson@fce.com>, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

Just checking you all out!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kaye Davenport/HOU/EES on 03/14/2001
01:04 PM ---------------------------

"Blair Hodges" <blair_hodges@hotmail.com> on 03/14/2001 12:29:51 PM
To: brhodes@downstreamenergy.com, mscandyd2001@msn.com,
Donna.Laird@Wilcom.com, GPhillips@dacg.com, mipopi@hotmail.com,
kdavenpo@enron.com, kwilliam@alogic.com, merry@tjtaxlaw.com,
wondershea@prodigy.net, mknbrd_2000@yahoo.com, theresa.viguerie@inteq.com,
hayatu@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: The QUIZ

The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you are
qualified to be a "professional". Scroll down for each answer. The questions
are not that difficult.

1.  How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close
the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an
overly complicated way.

2.  How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?

Wrong answer: Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the
refrigerator.

The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe,
put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to
think through the repercussions of your actions.

3.  The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals
attend except one. Which animal does not attend?

The correct answer is: The Elephant. The Elephant is in the refrigerator.
This tests your memory. Okay, even if you did not answer the first three
questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your abilities.

4.  There is a river you must cross, but it is inhabited by crocodiles. How
do you manage it?

The correct answer is: You swim across.  All the Crocodiles are attending
the Animal Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.
According to Andersen Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the professionals
they tested got all 4 questions wrong. But many preschoolers got several
correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the
theory that most professionals have the brains of a four year old.

Send this out to frustrate all of your friends

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Group,
As most of you are aware we changed time zones on Sunday. We are back in Pacific Standard Time. As such, we are once again in a different time zone than some of our counterparties. Please specify Pacific time zone in your summary of your deal at the end of each phone call--translate the deal to Mountain time only if necessary. We must be very clear on this going forward or disputes will be numerous and we will not be able to resolve them. See me if you have any questions regarding this expectation.
Thanks,

Bill


FYI.  Is this the same on NNG and TW?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laferla, Lynda
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila; Blair, Lynn; Studebaker, James ; Bryant, Mike
Subject:	Market Area Allocations

	I received a question this morning from FGU regarding a cut they got on contract 5141 for ID-2.  The total volume nominated on the

	contract did not change from ID-1 to ID-2, however, they did move around some volumes on their delivery points - (decreased some

	primary delivery points and increased alternate-firm delv. points).  When we did the Market Area allocation for ID-2, it looked at

	the "alternate point" increase as "incremental" - even though total contract volume remained the same.  I was somewhat confused by

	this cut  and talked with Joe Hoang.

	According to Joe:  PLEASE NOTE that the Market Area Flowing rights for a contract are retained by:

	1)   Contract
	2)   Gas Type
	3)   Nominator - Duns

	Therefore, if a shipper  has a total of 30,000 mmbtu's of flowing gas rights on a contract:  10,000 Alternate firm and 20,000
	of Primary firm and they change their nom - reducing the Primary firm volume to 15,000 and increase the Alternate firm
	volume to 15,000 - the additional 5,000 of Alternate firm would be considered "incremental".

	FYI

	Lynda


Dave,

Attached please find a clean and blacklined copy of the above-referenced
Agreement.


Steve,

We can accelerate the process. We need some internal approvals.
Please, talk to Richard Lewis and  let him know I think it's OK
to publish it because it is a very high level theoretical paper.

Vince

Steven Leppard
02/01/2000 09:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Publishing my real options work

Vince

What are the chances of, say, Risk publishing my work before the June
conference?  Do they have peer review etc.?

Steve


Dan,

I realize that the collateral language has been in the contract throughout
our negotiations.  However, our VP of credit only recently reviewed the
contract.

His concern is that, with a collateral limit of only $1.5 million, Ormet
would be exposed to having to post a LOC every month with natural gas prices
where they are currently.

I suggested to Craig that we make it $10 million, consistent with Enron's
collateral limit.  I realize that Enron's credit group ultimately needs to
decide on an amount.  $10 million my be a bit too high, but $1.5 million is
too low.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,
Mike

>>> <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com> 12/08/00 04:08PM >>>

Mike,
     I have reviewed the requested changes to Exhibit D, I am okay with the
proposed changes so long as the same changes are made to Exhibit C.  The
change to Suspension of performance on Appendix 1 is okay.  The collateral
requirement language has been in the contract for some time so I am
concerned with bringing up changes at this late date; however, please let
me know your concern so that we can resolve the issue with the Enron Credit
group.

                    "Mike
                    Cesario"             To:     <Craig.Breslau@enron.com>,
                    <MCesario@orm        <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
                    et.com>              cc:
                                         Subject:     Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement
                    12/08/2000
                    10:16 AM

Attached is a copy of Ormet's mark-up to the Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
post V.P. of Finance review.  The changes are primarily to Exhibit D.
Additionally, there is one chage under Suspension of Performance on
Appendix 1 page "1"-3.  Finally, we need to address the collateral
requirment/termination payment threshhold in section 4.3.
Thanks,
Mike

(See attached file: Enron_Agreement.doc)


fyi, please respond, tx rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 10:26 AM
---------------------------

Larry L Izzo@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 10:04 AM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: DASH FOR RIOGEN MERCHANT (AKA "ELECTROBOLT")

Rick, I was provided a copy of the DASH at 6:30 PM last evening and asked to
sign off soonest.  My comments follow:

Cost:  the DASH is incorrect.  EECC has provided both a cost - plus price and
a guaranteed price.
EECC has provided a NEPCO-guaranted price of $215MM.
EECC has indicated that it's estimate of actual costs is most likely $205MM.
We indicated this cost estimate was somewhat conservative.  Since last week,
the cost estimate has been further revised to $202MM.  It is unlikely that
the actual costs of the project will be significantly less than $202MM.
$202MM represents a cost estimate with the Owners maintaining the risk of
overruns and schedule.  This would require the Owner to maintain a
contingency in his proforma above the most likely expected cost of $202MM.
After providing the above information to the Developer, the Developer was
going to take a look at the carrying cost of turbines which were inside this
estimate; I have no update on whether the turbine price changed from the
numbers I saw last week.
Schedule:  Neither my team nor I had seen the provisions of termination by
Petrobras, as stated in the DASH, prior to last evening.  The ability of
Petrobras to terminate at April 30, 2002 if the project is not completed due
to circumstances within Enron's controls, is an unlikely risk, but not
totally impossible.  Further, the project is subject to a June 30, 2002,
termination by Petrobras if the project is not completed due to force
majeure.  This is considered more of an onerous risk.  It's not clear to me
whether the requirement to complete the pipeline and bring gas to the project
would be considered under Enron's control, considering that Enron is a
partial Owner in CEG, the gas distribution pipeline company.
On the other hand, we have indicated that an October 31, 2001 start-up, is
reasonable, based on a full NTP by January 1, and site access on February 1.
If the schedule is constrained by the RAC recommendation to limit expenses to
$15MM, the October 31, start-up could be at risk.
Performance:  The stated agreement with Petrobras for 365 megawatts (site
condition) and an average net degraded heat rate of 9169 btu/kWH, appears
correct, if it is LHV.
O&M Guarantee:  The DASH is not clear on what O&M availability guarantee
Enron is prepared to sign with Petrobras.  I would suggest that OEC insure it
agrees with any availability guarantees prior to Enron signing the Petrobras
agreement.

Rick, sorry for this late feedback, but our system of coordination with the
RAC needs improvement.  In the days when I worked with EI, EECC would provide
to EI a written due diligence report direct, after checking the proforma
against the PPA.  This was an Enron lesson-learned after years of
experience.  The recent reorganizations have diluted this procedure.  I
suggest I discuss with you how to improve our due diligence process.

Regards,

Larry

LI54600


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Meeting w/ David Jones, Frank Vickers, Scott Hendrickson, Chris Germany, Robin Barbe, Ed McMichael, Raiford Smith


This message contains the text of Sidney Weintraub's November issue of Issues
in International Political Economy entitled "Critical Aspects of the Global
Economy." To go directly to the web version, please click on:

http://www.csis.org/americas/pubs/weintraubnewsletters112000.html

For further information, contact:
Rebecca Tunstall
202-775-3123
rtunstall@csis.org

ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
November 2000, Number 11

CRITICAL ASPECTS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
Sidney Weintraub

When the word "globalization" is uttered, it evokes two contradictory
visceral reactions: it is either the essential element of recent U.S.
competitiveness; or it is inherently evil because the global spread of
multinational corporations enriches the wealthy and economically powerful at
the expense of the vast multitude of workers. In what follows, I will avoid
both attacks and praise, and instead focus on key features of international
trade and investment that characterize what is taking place in much of the
world.

A country, if its dictatorial leader so insists, can set its own prohibitive
tariff and import structure and reject foreign investment. North Korea and
Vietnam, both nondemocratic, did this for many years, despite the horrible
cost this policy imposed on national welfare. This isolation is breaking down
in these two countries, even as it did earlier in China after the death of
Mao, and for much the same reason. Eternal poverty is not a good formula for
regime continuity.

Guarding economic sovereignty did not take the same absolutist form in most
other countries, but a profound transformation is taking place in them as
well. Import barriers are coming down and attacks against foreign investment
are being transmuted into searches to attract foreign investment. Mexico,
before its debt collapse in 1982, favored external borrowing over investment
to obtain foreign exchange, but learned to its dismay that this practice
contained its own risks when the debt could not be serviced. The philosophic
base of development then changed and foreign investment was actively sought
as an essential requirement for Mexico to augment its exports. This outlook
was the premise of NAFTA. Hugo Ch?vez, the president of Venezuela, rails
against primitive neoliberalism (neoliberalismo salvaje), but nevertheless
has kept the country's import tariffs relatively low, even as he makes a
great effort to obtain foreign direct investment to develop his country's
telecommunications and natural gas activities. Ch?vez, so far, has shown a
tendency to talk like a Marxist, much like Fidel Castro, his romantic icon,
but then act like a capitalist.

For many of the world's poorest countries, the primordial problem is not the
spread of multinational corporations, but their inability to participate in
the process. This is especially true in sub-Saharan Africa. Their poverty,
small internal markets, and accompanying political instability make them poor
destinations for foreign investment, other than to exploit minerals for
export. This does not lead to substantial job creation.

Both foreign direct investment and international trade are growing more
rapidly than world economic growth. This is a clear manifestation that the
"foreign" aspect of the world economy is becoming increasingly important. If
one looks back only 20 years, when the dominant economic model in Latin
America was to develop behind high import barriers and to downplay the
importance of exports, it is startling how much development thinking has
changed in that part of the world. East Asia, with its export orientation,
became the model, and not the preachings of those who advised Latin America
to look inward.

The bulk of the world's trade is carried on by large corporations. This is
not a new phenomenon. These same corporations are large investors in foreign
manufacturing and service activities. Indeed, the two phenomena-investing and
producing in foreign countries and then selling much of the output in still
other foreign countries, as well as the home market-are inseparable.

International trade is increasingly taking place in intermediate rather than
final products-chips for computers, parts for office machinery, engines for
automobiles and trucks, cotton and wool fabrics for apparel. Look under the
hood of your car; the transmission assembly may have elements produced in a
number of countries. The assembly line in Detroit works on a just-in-time
basis to receive the material needed from across the border in Windsor,
Ontario-and beware of a slowdown from a customs snafu that leads to a costly
disruption in the manufacturing process.

This goes by the name coproduction. The parts are produced in a variety of
locations, assembled in other places, and sold globally. Much of the sales
are within the same multinational corporation, say, from a parent to a
subsidiary (intra-firm trade), or within the same sector (intra-industry
trade). As goods pass across borders in this fashion, the absence of border
impediments (tariffs, lengthy inspection delays) is crucial, as the
automotive example between Windsor and Detroit exemplifies. Hence, the drive
for trade negotiations to lower these barriers and the proliferation of
regional economic integration agreements, such as NAFTA, to legally ensure
the absence of delays in a just-in-time world.

Economic integration and, by extension, the process of globalization, is
centered on competition in particular sectors when it comes to production and
merchandise trade. What is taking place is a form of division of labor-Adam
Smith on a regional and global scale. The global aspect is made possible by
technology, advances in communication and transportation, and by financing
far more vast than anything seen before. Corporations take many factors into
account when setting up complementary plants in foreign countries, such as
size of the domestic market, the availability and price of labor, the cost of
transportation, and the political stability of the country where the
investment is made. The growth of U.S. coproduction with Mexico was based
primarily on two considerations: proximity, and thus low transportation
costs; and inexpensive labor. Most foreign direct investment is made among
industrial countries, which is evidence that cheap labor is by no means
always the dominant criterion. This is evident as well from the paucity of
investment in the world's poorest countries.

If most international trade is conducted by large corporations, what does
this imply for the future of small and medium-sized enterprises? In just
about all countries, goods and services that are not internationally traded
are more voluminous than tradables. In addition, many large corporations have
concluded that making all inputs in-house is not the most efficient practice
and instead are subcontracting to independent producers and service
providers-and many of these are relatively small enterprises. Their products
are then exported indirectly, via the exports of the large corporations.

There is no intent in this discussion to assert that multinational
corporations invariably provide their workers with optimal working conditions
and good salaries and are always careful to avoid environmental degradation
in their operations. We know that many corporations are not that meticulous,
even though we also know that wages and working conditions in foreign
transplants generally are superior to those of domestic enterprises. We know
that foreign trade and investment results in losers in the home countries,
although by now it is clear that there are many more winners. We know that
the global spread of business benefits some countries more than others and
that some regions of countries prosper while others lag behind. The
globalization genie-in the form of investment, trade, financial flows, and
technology advances-is out of the bottle. The challenges are to minimize the
downside dangers while exploiting the upside benefits that globalization can
offer to countries throughout the world.

Issues in International Political Economy is published by the William E.
Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on
international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and
nonproprietary.

CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views,
positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood
to be solely those of the author.

, 2000 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.


----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000 09:45 AM -----

	Emma Facy@ECT
	12/08/2000 03:41 AM

		 To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Pickering/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katy
Lomax/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Press Clippings - Enron Mention - GARY HAMEL

"Chance for Survival" - GARY HAMEL

---------------------- Forwarded by Emma Facy/LON/ECT on 07/12/2000 17:28
---------------------------


Hey kiddo.  I didn't get in until last night.  My weekend went allright. Most
of it was filled with family stuff.  Saturday night I just hung out with my
dad and watched the beavs game on tv.  I did go out to Hollywood with some
friends on Sunday night however. It was a friend of mines birthday so we went
over to his house and then to this club in Hollywood.  It  was  a good time
however, pretty mellow.  I went with my friends Chrissy and Allison and they
both had to work on Monday so we left at around midnight.  It was okay with
me however, as I really wasnt that into partying anyway.
Oh yeah, I got that job.  I think I start tommorow night which means I will
be working this weekend which really sucks as there is a beavs game, but I am
really looking forward to this new position.  How did your weekend go?  Any
exciting stories?


What day is this on?

Becky Bruce
09/11/2000 02:05 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Traci
Warner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Porter/HOU/EES@EES,
Bernie Barcio/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
Wilson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill Windle/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Spector/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar
Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Waymon Votaw/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Dye/HOU/EES@EES, Jon Adler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg
Characklis/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Leib/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen Stenhouse/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Trevor Randolph/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Charles Baker Varnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, Micha Makowsky/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jaime
Gualy/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Michelle
cc: Mary Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Justice/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Rice Partio Details - Please RSVP to me!

Hi everyone!  Thank you to all who attended the MBA presentation last week.
I think it was a great success!
Below are the details for the Rice Partio...

Location:  Rice Campus - Herring Hall  ( in front of building, on "patio").
Time:  5:30 pm to 7:30 pm (Students begin the event at 4:30 pm; however,
companies arrive at 5:30 pm)
Dress:  Casual

Please RSVP by replying to this message with a yes or a no.  I want to make
sure I have name tags for all participating.

Thanks again!  I look forward to meeting everyone soon.

Becky Bruce


FYI.  David Freeman and DWR....public power working for California.
********************************************************
Power delivery efficiency questioned: Output at low-cost generating plants
has been cut while costlier ones continue to operate.
By Carrie Peyton
Bee Staff Writer
(Published July 31, 2001)
California is sometimes deliberately cutting output from low-cost power
plants while running more expensive ones, utility and grid officials say.
The sporadic episodes haven't cost much yet, but they illustrate a
potentially troubling disconnect in the system that has quickly grown between
two agencies that help deliver electricity to a power-strapped state.
"We seem to be building this inefficiency into the system, and it doesn't
seem to be getting better," said Mike Florio, a consumer advocate who sits on
the governing board of the Independent System Operator.
The trouble is that the ISO, created in 1996 to manage the power grid in a
deregulated electric market, tries to run the grid by auctions that -- in
theory -- provide the cheapest electricity for the state's consumers.
Meanwhile, the state Department of Water Resources, which in January stepped
in to buy power on behalf of cash-strapped utilities, isn't bidding at some
auctions because it believes it can provide cheaper power if it doesn't.
"We have an inefficient market and an inept government entity. It's sort of
the worst of both worlds," Florio said, criticizing his agency and the DWR.
ISO staffers decline to discuss the situation in detail, saying it involves
confidential bidding behavior.
But Pete Garris, chief of operations for the power-buying arm of the
Department of Water Resources, confirmed that the ISO has been asking his
agency to take part in more auctions, but the state has declined.
The state's role is to buy electricity for customers of utilities whose
credit was no longer good enough to buy on their own, he said.
"We're not in it to do those kinds of marketing functions," he said. "It's
not necessarily a good fit."
Some of the ISO auctions are used to lessen congestion on transmission lines.
Others are used to stabilize the grid by slightly increasing or decreasing
output when demand doesn't match forecasts.
Generally, the highest-cost power plants should be the ones cutting back, a
process the industry calls "decking."
But since May, on ISO orders, Southern California Edison has repeatedly
throttled back on the Mohave Generating Station, which produces some of the
cheapest power available to California today, costing as little as $10 to $20
a megawatt-hour.
Edison, which owns a majority share of Mohave, has cut its output by 5,660
megawatt-hours between May and July, about one-half of 1 percent, at the
ISO's behest, according to data Edison provided to The Bee.
The ISO could probably have saved the state's consumers $370,000 at one plant
if it had asked a higher-cost gas-burning plant to cut back instead of
Mohave, a coal-burning workhorse in Laughlin, Nev., Florio said.
The amount sounds like "small potatoes," but in some ways it is more alarming
than the $14 million the state lost recently by selling excess power for less
than it paid, he said.
Industry experts agree that such below-cost sales are common in a business
where power needs fluctuate dramatically based on the weather.
By contrast, "this is a dead weight loss. Higher costs are being incurred for
no good reason," Florio said.
"The question is, why is the ISO calling on Mohave and not (cheaper) gas
plants? The answer is, the gas plants aren't bidding ... probably because
they're contracted with DWR," he said.
Four Corners, another low-cost coal plant partly owned by Edison, has also
been throttled back at ISO request, Edison officials said.
In addition, so few bidders have shown up at ISO auctions to ease stress on
transmission lines that the system has fallen into disarray, with the ISO
instead ordering across-the-board power production cuts that are boosting
costs, Florio said.
For its part, the ISO will say only that "we are making the most economical
decisions we can based on the bids available," said spokeswoman Stephanie
McCorkle.
DWR's Garris said the state and the ISO have been meeting repeatedly on
bidding and other coordination issues, and he hopes to have a
smoother-running system in place by next summer.

The Bee's Carrie Peyton can be reached at (916) 321-1086 or
cpeyton@sacbee.com <mailto:cpeyton@sacbee.com>.


Paul,

Saludos


Just thought you would want to know this feedback.

----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 06/19/2001 01:59 PM -----

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	06/19/2001 09:38 AM

		 To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Way to go!

Ray -- Phillip Allen said that you had called him this am about the Cal order
and he thinks that he is getting better info from our Washington office and
appreciates the efforts.  Keep it up!  Thanks.


To all Energy Operations employees:

ENA has experienced extraordinary growth thus far in 2000.  I am especially
proud of the accomplishments of Energy Operations in supporting this growth.
I wanted to express my appreciation for all the hard work and dedication that
you have demonstrated.  We have done great work and I want to recognize you
for that.

Although we have done much, we have additional goals to accomplish within ENA
and Energy Operations this year.  Therefore, as we go forward, I want to make
sure that you have all the necessary tools to do the best possible job, and
that any barriers that may impede your work are removed.

To help in this effort, I have asked a consulting organization -- S.J. Bashen
Corporation -- to survey our organization; to "take its pulse" if you will;
to help us understand what in our environment fosters success and where we
could improve; in essence, to assist us in acquiring the "necessary tools"
and breaking down any "barriers."  SJBC is comprised of seasoned consultants
who assist organizations like ours to help on issues like this.  SJBC will
meet with members of our group in a private setting where we can highlight
our successes, discuss our concerns, ask our questions, make our comments,
and the like.  This collective information then is studied by SJBC with the
goal of providing us an opinion regarding our strengths and weaknesses.
Specific input will not be identified by the individual who provided that
input.

Many of you will be receiving a phone call in the near future from a SJBC
consultant.  Please schedule a time to participate at your earliest
opportunity, as this effort will be a success for our group only if we
cooperate to the fullest extent.  Of course, given the size of our group, it
will not be possible to meet with each of you.  Therefore, if you have not
received a call from SJBC by August 15 but would like to share your thoughts
with them, please feel free to contact Cheryl Brown at 713.780.8056 and
Cheryl will be glad to include you in our survey.

Communication is one of Enron's core values.  I want to stress that only
through open communication will this survey be a success.  Please be candid.
Thank you.

Sally


Drew, you're so sly!  Thanks for including us in your memo.

Good job in working through this issue to come up with a solution!

Kent


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000 06:14 PM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
01/04/2000 05:24 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Sloman/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 1/4

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 1/4/00.

Regards
Molly


Anthony,

I just spoke to the Entergy lawyer, and this merger isn't effective until
2/1/01.  She will be sending me documents when they are filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State.  So you don't need to worry about this.

	Anthony Campos
	01/18/2001 02:52 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: merging of Koch Energy Trading and Entergy Power Marketing

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
02:48 PM ---------------------------
From: Karen Lambert on 01/18/2001 01:41 PM
To: Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Allan/LON/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Lafuze/Enron
Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON, Molly.Lafuze@enron.net, Alexia
Gonzales/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Furter/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Wells/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Schultz/NA/Enron@ENRON, cbalfou@enron.com, Laurie
Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Marlene Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina LaVallee/CAL/ECT@ECT, James Scully/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda K Loukanis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Gail Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matilda
Machado/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi
Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Diana Andel/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: merging of Koch Energy Trading and Entergy Power Marketing

Please let me know if someone in SAP is already working with EOL on this and,
if so, the status.

Thank you,
Karen
x3-0605

---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001 01:39
PM ---------------------------

From:  EOLHelp
01/18/2001 01:25 PM

Sent by: Mary Griff Gray
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, EOL Call Center
Subject: merging of Koch Energy Trading and Entergy Power Marketing

heads up

Effective February 1, 2001, Koch Energy Trading and Entergy Power Marketing
will be merging.  The new name will be Axia Energy Trading.  I have left a
voice mail for Karen to call the customer with details of what Enron requires
to accomplish this change in our systems.  I also conferenced Vikkie Karel
(Koch Energy  -- 713-544-5269) with Walter for clarification of the parties
that are merging.

Regarding EOL users from both companies, is there a way that the customer can
keep IDs/filters/etc. and move to the new name? OR, will new IDs need to be
created?  ===== this is for you, Stephanie

Griff


Bummer.  Too bad all of us are captive to Eric's schedule.
Bill and I enjoyed our too-short trip to the GC.  We hiked down Bright Angel
trail to the second rest stop, which was plenty for me.  It was pretty hot.
Wish we could have stuck around longer but Bill had to be back for a trial.
Talk about restrictive travel schedules.
I was thinking about you and Karin and wanting to take your customary nature
trips...you know, when Grayson is a little older, we could go on some trips
and just take turns staying at the hotel/cabin with her while everyone else
goes hiking/climbing/whatever.  You might have to pay for extra hotel days
that way, but at least you would get to go.  In the meantime, what about
staying in one place for a week or so -- a beach house, for example.  Eric
permitting, I think it would be fun to get everyone together in Florida or
Colorado sometime within the next year.
My car is ready at the shop.  Yay!
Ciao,
Sus.

"Shelton, Jim" <js@overlandpartners.com> on 05/05/2000 08:55:34 AM
To: "'Susan.Scott@enron.com'" <Susan.Scott@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: here we go again

Sus:

Not to complain,but AARRRRRRRRRRGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now that we have canceled our reservations for the cabin at Zion for the end
of October, because Eric's window of opportunity for travel in California
was limited to that specific two week period, and have been on the phone for
a week making earlier arrangements and putting a deposit down, it seems
that, "well, you see there is this car race in Carmel and, well we would
really rather go earlier in the month"

Well we lost the cabin and spent money for accommodations that are not as
good, and that's why we checked before.

tuff

jim


In This Issue:

* Third World or Third Rate?  We compare California's regulatory
system to Argentina's and find the latter's to be far superior.  Despite the
fact that American consultants played a substantial role in designing superb
regulatory systems for many Latin American countries, the lessons were not
well-applied at home.

* Energy Technology News:  A very busy week, highlighted by events
surrounding the power "crisis" in California and the Pacific Northwest.  Our
news summary and analysis begins on page 10.

* Energy Technology Stock Performance Tables

Prometheus Unbound:  Navigating the Structural Revolution in Electric Power,
will be back from the printer on Monday.  To be sure you receive a copy,
email us to request one.  (While the report is information-packed, at 330
pages we don't recommend it as a stocking stuffer.  Reading it might
alleviate the holiday blahs, especially if you're snowed in).

Best regards and happy holidays,
Cary, Steve and Peter

 <<prometheus001215.pdf>>

 - prometheus001215.pdf


Tana Lou,

I am back to bugging you about your bicycle.  Let me know when I can
schedule a test ride.

Patti

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:10 AM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: Re: Monday

Offer still good.  How goes things with the new beau?  Also, thanks for the
cooked meats.  They were delicious!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     Monday
                    02/26/2001 12:08
                    PM

Morning, Glory,

Hope you are doing well and had a good weekend.

I am still considering the MS 150 and wanted to know if your offer is still
good for borrowing your bicycle.  If you have changed your mind, it is no
big deal.  Promise!

Patti


Please provide the appropriate credit approval for Transwestern for the following:

Shipper :		Wasatch Energy, LLC
Contract # :		27724
Contract Type :	IT
Term :		11/01/01 through 10/31/02 + Evergreen
MDQ :			7,000 Dth/d

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 06/20/2002 07:29
AM ---------------------------

Kurt Anderson
06/19/2002 05:28 PM
To: Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Feb Curtailment, cont'd

---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 06/19/2002
05:43 PM ---------------------------

wcmarshall@aep.com on 06/19/2002 12:49:04 PM
To: peter.simpson@garradhassan.co.uk, keir.harman@garradhassan.co.uk,
kurt.anderson@ps.ge.com
cc: jfgodfrey@aep.com

Subject: Re: Feb Curtailment, cont'd

David has compared the ERCOT production data with the 10 min SCADA data. ?See
the results below.

Ward C. Marshall
Director, Business Development
AEP Energy Services, Inc.

Office (614) 583-6607
Fax ? ? (614) 583-1627
Cell ? ? (614) 736-6022

Mailing Address:
PO Box 16036
Columbus, OH 43216-0036

Physical Address:
155 W. Nationwide Blvd.
Suite 500
Columbus, OH 43215
----- Forwarded by Ward C Marshall/AEPIN on 06/19/2002 03:45 PM -----

	David F Matson <dfmatson@attbi.com>

	06/19/2002 02:46 PM
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?wcmarshall@aep.com
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?Re: Feb Curtailment, cont'd

Ward:
I have added a tab on the previous file (attached here), with 15-minute
intervals, from the ERCOT data. ?If you check the tab with the total of
each curtailment period, you will see numbers similar to the 10-minute
data, and a total at the bottom of the table that is roughly the same.
What does this mean? ?I suppose it shows that the 10-min data was as
accurate as the 15-min data, and that the innaccuracies come from some
other source, such as log entries, which turbines were actually
curtailed, etc. ?I noticed at least a couple of time when the number of
turbines listed in the outage table does not match the list of
individual turbines, and when the number of hours does not match the
start and end times of the curtailed periods.
I think this at least answers one of the questions about which data set
can be used.
I'm hopeful that looking at each hour of both techniques shows a small
difference over the whole month will prove to be useful.
David

--
David F. Matson
Consulting Meteorologist ? ? ?
1650 Saint Lawrence Way
Pleasant Hill, CA ?94523
925-933-7505 (voice & fax)
dfmatson@attbi.com

 - CURTAIL-Feb2002-temp.xls


Greg: I will not be able to go to lunch with you, dinner is possible. I would
suggest you wear a suit. I am not sure at this point who you will interview
with, I should know soon. I will call you 8/23 to talk about Thurs. If you do
not hear from me please call me (wk 853-7699, hm 972-1208).


Start Date: 1/1/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010120.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked.
Table
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.
!!!A user transaction is already in progress.

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/1/02
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_NG-PLV
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SW
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/1/02
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_8001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/1/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 85602 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 05:45 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	05/15/2000 05:42 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/15/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 5/15/00

Regards
tm


I'm available on Monday. Thanks!


If you have players playing in tonight's game (det v TB) you need to put them
in your lineup tonight


---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

<Jeffrey.W.Dellapina@chase.com> on 09/28/2000 01:39:42 PM
To: Catherine.Clark@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Chase-Canadian Prepay

I understand that the Floating Price Calculation and some other points may
have
changed.  Pls re-send.

Catherine.Clark@enron.com on 09/28/2000 12:49:44 PM

To:   Jeffrey W. Dellapina/CHASE@CHASE
cc:
Subject:  Chase-Canadian Prepay

---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

From: Tana Jones on 09/27/2000 07:11 PM

To:   Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
      Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Catherine
      Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
      jeffrey.dellapina@chase.com, jeff.dellapina@chase.com
cc:
Subject:  Chase-Canadian Prepay

Attached please the proposed forms of Confirmation with respect to the
referenced transaction.  Please call me or Sara Shackleton if you have any
comments or questions.

(See attached file: ENACHASEnymex1.doc)(See attached file:
ENACHASEnymex2.doc)

 - ENACHASEnymex1.doc
 - ENACHASEnymex2.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
01:34 PM ---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
01/11/2001 10:17 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Cooper Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Preliminary 2001 Northwest Hydro Outlook

Here's our first cut at a full year hydro projection:  Please keep
confidential.


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012601.txt


Steve, I don't know if we are duplicating your effort, but our ECT lawyers
here were also concerned about business review of these product descriptions,
so they have forwarded these descriptions on to their respective business
groups for approval.  If we are duplicating your work, or doing something
contrary to what we should be doing, please call me or Jeff and we will try
to coordinate our responses.  Otherwise, we will continue the review we are
doing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/03/99 04:01 PM
---------------------------

Awais Omar
09/03/99 02:12 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Tana, Steven,  here are the last three descriptions

Steven I have a special favour to ask.  All the descriptions were written by
the commercial groups and they are a bit scanty on regulatory in places.
The following descriptions need some attention which I would appreciate if
someone from your dept could give.

LPG  This is missing a complete section.  Is it possible to insert a couple
of paragraphs here.
US Nat Gas A have written this anfroma alot of material I got fromt he
group.  However I still feel the reg section is more of a historical
recounter than a statement of the current environment.  The last paragraph
mentions about the reg bodies for LDC's.  Is it possible to add a little bit
more on the current reg bodies and regulations themselves.

Thanks

Awais

---------------------- Forwarded by Awais Omar/LON/ECT on 03/09/99 19:57
---------------------------

Awais Omar
03/09/99 18:34
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Steven,

attached in the document are the next four descriptions.  Only 3 o/s now ont
he liquids markets.  I will try to get these to you today as well.

Thanks

Awais
44 171 970 7377

---------------------- Forwarded by Awais Omar/LON/ECT on 03/09/99 18:34
---------------------------

Awais Omar
03/09/99 18:31
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Sorry for the delay.

Here are the next four descriptions.

Only the three liquids one waiting now.

I have sent these to David Forster in our Project group to review first
before I send them to yourself.  If I don't get them back today I will send
them over the weekend so they are there for you on Monday.

Could you please send me comments back on all the other descriptions today.
Is your fax machine at your end OK?  It's just that the other fax you sent
came through a dark background making the comments a little hard to read.

My fax is 44 171 316 5420.

Awais

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           01/09/99 23:13

To: Awais Omar/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnronOnline Market Descriptions

Awais,

I have forwarded the descriptions you have sent us thus far to the respective
Legal Trading Lawyers to sign off as far any legal issues we may have with
the descriptions.  I understand your deadline is the end of the week.

When can I expect the remaining descriptions?


Bruce,

Greg Whalley would like to speak with you on tomorrow, Wednesday, June 28.
Please give me a call tomorrow to schedule a time to talk w/Greg.

Many Thanks,

Liz