I'll check around with some people today.

	Richard Shapiro
	11/22/2000 05:46 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego
Union-Tribune

Don't know- Does anyone know?

From: James D Steffes on 11/22/2000 07:43 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego
Union-Tribune

Do you think that there is a deal in the works and we are "out in the rain"?
I have to doubt that DENA or Southern are willing to give $ back to
California.  Maybe Reliant would.

Jim

	Richard Shapiro
	11/22/2000 07:37 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego Union-Tribune

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000
07:36 AM ---------------------------

"Lynne Church" <LCHURCH@epsa.org> on 11/21/2000 05:21:23 PM
To: <joer@calpine.com>, <jmdonnell@duke-energy.com>,
<wfhall@duke-energy.com>, <KERA@dynegy.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>, <smutny@iepa.com>,
<craig.mataczynski@nrgenergy.com>, <Kent_Burton@Ogden-Energy.com>,
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, <cslesser@seiworldwide.com>,
<jtmiller@thermoecotek.com>, <Tim.Thuston@williams.com>, <gackerman@wptf.org>
cc: "Gene Peters" <GPETERS@epsa.org>, "Julie Simon" <JSIMON@epsa.org>, "Mark
Stultz" <MSTULTZ@epsa.org>

Subject: Report of Editorial Board Meeting with the San Diego Union-Tribune

IEP's public affairs consultant arranged an editorial board meeting for me
while I was in town for the NARUC meeting.  Present were Don Sevrens, news
editor/insight section; Bill Osborne, senior editor/opinion; Jim Gogek,
editorial writer; Bernie Jones, editor, opinion pages; Craig Rose, the
reporter who has written extensively on the topic, and a photographer.

My two primary messages were that (1) wholesale and retail competition is
working elsewhere, particularly in Pennsylvania, and can eventually work in
California if the rules are changed, and (2) California has a severe supply
shortage and needs to focus on providing incentives for new generation and
expediting the permitting process.  I was subtly trying to get across the
message that leadership was needed to help Californians deal with the need to
reconcile their environmental and land use goals with the need to bring their
power supply and demand into balance.  I, of course, defended FERC's order on
the causes of the price volatility in California this summer and their lack
of any authority to order retroactive refunds.  I also pointed out that there
were no findings of individual market abuse, so that refunds wouldn't be
warranted even if there was legal authority.  I also pointed out the problems
with price caps.

Other than Craig Rose, who disagreed with me any chance he got, the others
asked good questions and seemed to be listening.  They made the point
repeatedly that this matter is very political, suggesting that a political
compromise with the generators/marketers is necessary.  One of them said he
had heard there was a deal with the generators being negotiated and asked me
my position.  I responded that I had no response.  Anything like that is the
business of individual members.

They indicated that they expected to do a story for this coming Sunday's
Insight Section.  Please give me any feedback you have.

cc:  Stu Ryan, AES by fax
       Jim Macias, Calpine, by fax


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  ClearCase Patch
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This patch will resolve several issues involving the MVFS (ClearCase
file system.)
Backout: Remove the patch
Contact(s):  Troy Beyer  713.345.8316  713.406.1782

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 4/28/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London  thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  ISDN Calling Name and Number
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for number and name to appear on telephone displays.  If
testing is successful,
permanent changes will be put into effect at a later date.  These will not be
service affecting.
Backout: Unbusy trunk group.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard       713-853-0558
  Harold Williams      713-345-8917

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


meeting file
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/26/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Christine Elwell <scenergy@web.net>
	11/24/2000 03:48 PM

		 To: Andrew Horsman <Ahorsman@ccemtl.org>, stomasky@aep.com,
aescofet@alesco.com.mx, Rkelter@citizensutilityboard.org, skean@enron.com,
elizabeth.moler@exeloncorp.com, t.Rawls@greenmountain.com,
Klimpt.Jean-Etienne@hydro.qc.ca, RCavanagh@nrdc.org,
jgibbons@pollutionprobe.org, alesco@sisisa.podernet.com.mx,
Bob_page@transalta.com, ron.daniels@utoronto.ca, Greg Block
<Gblock@ccemtl.org>, Scott Vaughan <svaughan@ccemtl.org>,
philip_sharp@Harvard.edu
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: First Meeting of the Electricity Restructuring Advisory Board

Greetings and thanks to CEC for organizing this interesting
process...wanted to give you all a quick snapshot of were Sierra Club of
Canada is on electricity restructuring - we're hosting Canada's 1st
Green Power Trade Show - pls see attached program where you can see some
of the issues we are struggling with...looking forward to our first CEC
meeting together to help make a North American Green Power market
thrive....Wish us luck and I will fwd to you a copy of the materials and
final report if there is interest! Bye for now...Christine

Andrew Horsman wrote:

> Montreal, November 20, 2000
>
> RE:  North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Electricity
Advisory Board - Message from Chair
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on a few important planning
and communication matters regarding your participation on the North American
Commission for Environmental Cooperation's (NACEC) Electricity Advisory Board
and to provide you with the date for the upcoming meeting. It will take place
the 16th of January at the Commission's offices in Montreal.
>
> In August, I had the opportunity to visit the NACEC's Montreal headquarters
to discuss a number of the key issues to be addressed by the electricity
restructuring expert report and to get a better feel for the nature of the
guidance and input the Advisory Board can contribute to this initiative.
More than ever, I am convinced that the outstanding group of individuals
serving on the Advisory Board can play an important role in defining and
deepening our understanding of the key trade and environment issues at play
on a continental scale.
>
> The Secretariat has made considerable progress in conducting a thorough
scoping analysis, compiling a searchable database of renewable energy
definitions and portfolio standards and initiating work in the area of market
access and trade disciplines.  At this early stage of development of the
expert report, I believe it is an ideal time to schedule our first meeting of
the Advisory Board to familiarize ourselves with major issues and provide
advice on the scope and content of the report, as well as the broader
initiative.
>
> The Secretariat has been in contact with you in advance to select a date
for our first meeting so that the greatest number of Board members can
participate. Accordingly, we will hold a one-day meeting in Montreal on
Tuesday, the 16th of January 2001. The NACEC will cover all travel expenses
along with accommodations and per diem. The Meeting Coordinator at the NACEC,
Leticia Villeneuve, will be in touch to assist you in making your travel
arrangements. If you wish you may contact her at 514-350-4313. Those Board
members that cannot attend will be able to join portions of the meeting by
conference call.
>
> I have included a draft agenda for your review along with the list of
current members of the Advisory Board.  The Secretariat will soon establish a
web site and list serve to facilitate our communications, including the
exchange and review of documents. The Secretariat will also prepare, in
advance of our first meeting, a brief but detailed report outline, including
the major themes that are being considered for the report.  The Secretariat
is seeking our views on the key issues that warrant special analysis.
>
> I very much look forward to meeting you soon in Montreal.  As always, feel
free to contact me if you would like to talk over any aspect of our work
together. Or, if you have any questions regarding the logistics of the
meeting, please contact Alicia Chica at the Secretariat at 514-350-4330, or
by e-mail at achica@ccemtl.org .
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Philip Sharp
> Chair
>  North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Electricity
Advisory Board
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  Name: AGENDA.DOC
>    AGENDA.DOC    Type: Download File (application/msword)
>              Encoding: base64

--
****************************************
Christine Elwell
Sierra Club of Canada
Senior Policy Analyst
517 College St. Suite #237
Toronto, ON, Canada, M6G-4A2
Phone#:416-533-5177 Fax:416-960-0020
E-mail: scenergy@web.net
****************************************
 - program.doc


One more reminder:

Meet and greet with Dean Nancy Rapoport.
Tuesday, March 6 at 8am
50M Dining Room

If you haven't already done so, please RSVP by replying to this email or call
Jim Grace at x57702

Thanks.


Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer.  In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence.  Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron.  He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us.  Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.

Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations.  Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp.  In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.

I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price.  I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around.  Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process.  But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence.  The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.

Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work.


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011004.txt


Several thoughts from federal reg./transmission side:
I haven't worked with a VEPCO interconnection agreement yet, but many times
there are requirements that the generator is required to provide emergency
power to the interconnected transmission provider, in which case you would
want the interconnection agreement to cover all costs you would incur to
replace the energy at a different location (usually it is difficult to get
this agreement, so you should check and then factor that into the equation).
I would be happy to look at the interconnection agreement with you.
Interconnection of generation is a separate process from requesting
transmission.  It appears that VEPCO has to buy the transmission (or use its
network transmission) when the Delivery Point is the plant.  Enron will have
to purchase transmission on VEPCO if it is selling to third parties off the
plant and will have to purchase transmission on other systems if it wants to
supply at an alternate delivery point.  Please discuss this with Kevin
Presto's tranmission people (Bill Rust on 31).  Enron cannot use VEPCO's
network transmission to delivery to third parties.
Is this plant in the VEPCO queue yet?  Also, FERC has issued some recent
rulings that deal with time limits on system impact studies, etc.  While
VEPCO is probably incentivized to get this built, you want to make sure that
you do not lose optionality in selling to third parties from the plant due to
transmission constraints.  A request for transmission on OASIS is the only
way to ensure deliverability to third parties.
3.5 (c) Intra-day scheduling--You may have hourly transmission risk for an
increase.  Unless you buy longer term firm, you will deliver from other
sources using hourly non-firm, which is the lowest priority of transmission
and subject to getting cut.  You may want to consider doing this on
best/reasonable efforts basis.  (Also, even if you purchase
daily/monthly/yearly firm to serve third parties, if you change the point of
receipt or point of delivery temporarily, your request is treated as
non-firm.)
12.4--Currently VEPCO is interested in joining the Alliance ISO (an RTO that
has not been approved by FERC yet--competing ISO to Midwest ISO), but since
FERC has not approved any RTO for VEPCO yet, there could be significant
changes in the transmission charges/methods of obtaining
transmission/grandfathering of current transmission, etc during this
contract.  Make sure with the ENA attorneys that this out/increase in price
covers that circumstance.
Underlying tranmission rates on VEPCO or any other provider can change at
most any time, subject to the provider filing a rate case.  Therefore, any
current transmission rates shown on OASIS are not necessarily what you will
pay over the term of any transmission that Enron may purchase to serve this
contract.  Generally, transmission providers will not agree to fixed rates.

Tom Chapman
06/13/2000 06:07 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

Christi--

This is the note that I received on Tuesday June 13.  This is a relatively
early draft of the PPA.

I think that we still have to purchase the land associated with the sites and
do the due diligence on the site with regards to some of the siting issues.
IN addition, in NC we are going to get a CPCN to site the plant to speed up
the regulatory process in the NCUC.  I think that this will make the issue
less contentious because of the NCUC's acceptance of the Dynegy plant at
Rockingham that had a PPA with Duke Power.

Using the Dynegy plant as a guideline, their only stumbling block was their
gas agreeement.  They built a bypass off Transco.  We would be taking gas
from the LDC of Rocky Mount.  Having talked with the regulatory folks at the
NCUC who handle gas issues, this is the preferred route.  So, I do not think
that we have any major state issues.  I think that right now we are simply
working on some of the siting issues.

That being said, I will let you take a look at the PPA and let me know or
Jeff Keenan (or even Heather Kroll or Ozzie Pagan) if you think that there
are some transmission issues or other issues on the federal level.

Thanks.

Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 06:04
PM ---------------------------

Linda J Simmons
06/13/2000 08:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

----- Forwarded by Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
	06/12/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: <linda.j.simmons@enron.com>, <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc: "William Frederking" <wfrederking@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: VEPCO PPA

Lisa:  Attached is a draft of the Power Purchase Agreement with VEPCO, based
on the current version of the term sheet.  In preparing the draft, we did
encounter several additional questions for Enron's consideration.  These are
noted with brackets and, in some cases, italicized notes, in the draft and
are also highlighted below.  You may want to address these issues before this
goes to VEPCO.

Cover and first page-- Should the party to the agreement (for the moment) be
ENA or a special purpose company?

Definitions--  We included a defined term "Emergency Start-Up" (a start up or
increase in energy scheduled during a day) and a place in Exhibit A to
include a price for this, although this was not covered in the term sheet.

Section 2.2--  We included a provision for VEPCO to take test energy (energy
charge only; no demand charge)--do you want this?

Section 2.3--  This was taken from the term sheet, but is it correct that COD
will be July 1 (since the demand charge is supposed to start June 1?)  Also,
it would be best to define "commencement of construction" to avoid
controversy down the road.  We could either do this now or put in a
placeholder that indicates it needs to be defined or be silent, whichever is
your preference.  Also, bear in mind that we have not included a specific
remedy (e.g., liquidated damages) if the Seller does not achieve that
milestone on time.  Under the default provision (Section 8.1(c)), there would
be a 30 day period to cure before Buyer could terminate (extendible to 90
days if a longer period of time is needed and Seller diligently pursues the
cure).  Would you prefer the right to pay ld's and extend the time period?

Section 3.1(b)--  Should the 1400 hour limitation apply to all sales under
this PPA or only sales from the Facility?  I.e., would you use this Agreement
to sell to VEPCO power in addition to what would be available from the
Facility?  Also, is this a calendar year limitation--i.e., could they take
1400 hours in the period June-Dec. 2001 or does the 1400 hours need to be
pro-rated for the first year?

Section 3.4-- Since this is not a base load plant, the normal definition of
Availability as the number of hours in a year of operations compared to the
total hours in the year would not seem to be applicable.  Instead, we stated
that the Facility would be capable of being available 92% of the year (other
than due to Force Majeure and 336 hours (2 weeks) of scheduled
maintenance)--i.e., that if they tried to schedule it, it is expected to be
available.  Is that what Enron intended?  Additionally, the term sheet stated
that a remedy for failure to meet Availability would need to be agreed--why
wouldn't cost of cover damages be appropriate? Also, please note that we
included language stating that Seller will not perform maintenance during
peak periods.

Section 3.5(b)-- Please note the bracketed language re taking Blocks of
Energy.  We have 50 MW minimum blocks but the capacity is 223--should we
allow the last Block to be 23 if they've scheduled all the rest?

Section 3.5(c)-- Please see the bracketed language at the end of this Section.

Section 4.7-- Should there a required minimum take of Energy?

Article 6-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form of PPA we used as a model did not
have any provisions on metering.  (See placeholder note in Article 6.)  Do
you want to add such a provision, ignore it or just include a placeholder for
now?

Section 9.1-- Is 30 days from invoice correct for the payment due date or
would you prefer a shorter period?

Article 15-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form had mediation as a required step
prior to arbitration.  Should we keep that?  Also, the form of arbitration is
"baseball" arbitration--i.e.,  the arbitrators have to chose one party's
position or the other's.  Is that what you want?

Section 16.2--  We used New York for governing law, on the premise that it
will be difficult to get VEPCO to agree to Texas law and we would not
recommend Virginia law for this contract.

Exhibit A-- There are a number of questions on the pricing exhibit--please
see the bracketed notes therein.

Please call and let us know how you would like to proceed on this draft.

 - VEPPPA.DOC


It is a CompareRite document.  If you "view" it in email, then you can save
it as a Word document.  If this doesn't work, let me know and I'll create a
Word doc.

Kay

From: Randy Pais on 02/05/2001 10:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Co Op City EPC contract

Kay thanks for sending this to me.  Unfortunately I am having difficulty
opening the document.  Was it written in something besides Word?.  Randy


Presentation and Discussion about the

 NEW East Power Trading Web Page

   and

  Data Beacon Cube on  Weather and Historical Pricing

The meeting will take place on Friday March 16th from 11:00 am to noon in
room 3125B


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
07:38 AM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 03/01/2000 07:37:32 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Updates: Mobile Edition and E-commerce survey

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <anchovy+economist-survey_feb00_text-1@anchovy.lodo.exactis.com>
Received: from  rly-zc04.mx.aol.com (rly-zc04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.4]) by
air-zc05.mail.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:39:31 -0500
Received: from  sender18.lodo.exactis.com (sender18.lodo.exactis.com
[192.147.174.45]) by rly-zc04.mx.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar
2000 00:39:04 -0500
Received: by sender18.lodo.exactis.com (version 5.4, queueup Copyright
Exactis.com, Inc. 2000) with stdio id INFOBEAAAAAA13531; Tue, 29 Feb 2000
22:34:58 MST
To: "Economist.com Reader":;
Subject: Updates: Mobile Edition and E-commerce survey
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: "Economist.com"<updates@economist.com>
Priority: normal
Errors-To: anchovy+economist-survey_feb00_text-1@anchovy.lodo.exactis.com
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:34:58 MST
Message-id: <5.72.5.0.0.13531.951888896@sender18.lodo.exactis.com>

We thought you might like to know about two new attractions at
www.economist.com : The Economist Mobile Edition, and our survey
of E-commerce, "Shopping around the web". Both are free.

****************************************************************************

MOBILE EDITION

In partnership with the AvantGo network, The Economist Mobile
Edition is now available for Palm Computing and Windows CE users,
letting you catch up with the latest from The Economist while
you're on the move. Using AvantGo's free software you can download
The Economist's editorials along with authoritative summaries of the
week's main events in politics and business when you synchronise
your handheld computer.

Subscribe now - it's free
1. Go to AvantGo.com http://avantgo.com/setup/index.html
to download the software. (If you already have AvantGo software
installed, go to step 2 below.) The process should take only a few
minutes. AvantGo provides software for your handheld computer,
and a small Windows utility to manage the channels you subscribe
to, which is installed on your computer during the sign-up process.
2. Subscribe to The Economist Mobile Edition channel
http://avantgo.com/login/add_channel.html to get content
designed for your palmtop.

If you are not sure whether you can access The Economist Mobile
Edition, click here http://avantgo.com/setup/requirements.html
or the AvantGo.com system-requirements page.
Require any further assistance? You can view the AvantGo help
section here: http://avantgo.com/help/

****************************************************************************

SHOPPING AROUND THE WEB

Electronic commerce is still so young that teething troubles were
only to be expected. But just watch it grow, argues our survey:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su7636

Where e-commerce wins hands down, and where it doesn't:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su6868

There may be room online for established firms and for virtual newcomers.
But which ones?
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su3796

Amazon's amazing ambition:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su6484

Can the web merchants deliver the goods?
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su3412

Everything has its price. The web can help you find out what it is:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su1876

Before e-commerce can go global, it needs to overcome a few tiresome
obstacles:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su0724

Retailers must change---or bite the dust:
http://www.economist.com/l.cgi?f=20000226/index_su7620

****************************************************************************
Customer Service

When you registered with The Economist website, you indicated an
interest in receiving email regarding updates to the site. If this is no
longer the case, or if you wish to amend your registration details
including changing your email address or signing up for our weekly
text or HTML newsletters, please click here:
http://www.economist.com/tfs/registration_tframeset.html

****************************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Callahan, Teresa
Sent:	Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Carnahan, Kathleen; Mann, Kay
Cc:	Cole, Kate
Subject:	RE: Delaware LLC Filing Fees
Importance:	High

Kathleen:  I looked at a recent invoice from our service company and the total fee is $286.00 - There is a first year statutory representation fee charged by the registered agent of $160.00 on top of filing fee, certified copy fee and service company charge for handling filing.  Please call me if you have any questions.  Teresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent:	December 20, 2001 5:14 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Cole, Kate; Callahan, Teresa
Subject:	Delaware LLC Filing Fees

http://www.state.de.us/corp/corpfee3.htm#LLC

According to the schedule of fees from the above SOS site for Delaware:

Certificate of Formation costs:
$50.00 (State Tax & Filing Fee)
$20.00 (Certified Copy)
Same Day Fee, if we want it $100.00
24 hour fee $50.00

I will confirm these fees with the corporate secretary tomorrow.


Max-- I asked Bonnie White to assist me on this matter because I have been
swallowed up on another project. Bonnie is with the Enron Litigation Unit and
spends most of her time on ENA litigation issues. I know what is happening
and I am still very much involved. If a lawsuit  is filed Ileana Blanco at
Bracewell will be our trial atty. Her role is small at this stage.

	Peggy Banczak
	10/11/2000 12:10 PM

		 To: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Marc Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: McKenna Matter

Max:

As I indicated in my voice mail message to you, Bonnie White is an Enron
inhouse litigator who is handling the McKenna matter and Ileana Blanco is a
Bracewell Patterson attorney whom Bonnie has retained to represent Enron in
the McKenna matter.

They are trying to learn more about the history of the McKenna project to be
able to distinguish it as clearly as possible from the Vitro project in an
effort to prevent the filing of litigation by McKenna.

If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

	Max Yzaguirre@ENRON
	10/11/2000 11:50 AM

		 To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Marc Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: McKenna Matter

Steves:

Before responding, can either of you tell me what this call is about and who
B. White and I. Blanco are?  Also, do you know why Richard Sanders wasn't
included in the TC?

Thanks - Max

---------------------- Forwarded by Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Deborah Shahmoradi on 10/11/2000 11:22 AM
To: myzagui@enron.com, steve.van.hooser@enron.com
cc:

Subject: McKenna Matter

SENT ON BEHALF OF BONNIE WHITE:

 I would like to set up a telephone conference between Steve, Max, Ileana
Blanco, and myself for sometime tomorrow, if possible.  Would you please
check your schedules and let my assistant, Deborah Shahmoradi at (713)
853-6118, know of your availability?

Deborah Shahmoradi
Email: deborah.shahmoradi@enron.com
Phone: (713) 853-6118


Microsoft article is now available for E220-1: Corporate Financial Reporting
through the Izio InfoPier system.  You will find it in the 'Handouts' section.

===========================================
This message was sent from the Izio InfoPier system at
http://haas.infopier.com.  To stop receiving these notifications, please
uncheck the box labeled "I want to be notified by email when course
information is updated" in the "Properties" section.


Start Date: 4/2/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040217.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Dear Susan and Jeff:

Here are examples of the declarations we filed with our earlier 1-28-00
settlements.  Please feel free to modify the format to suit your needs, as
what we really want is a concise description of the nature of the interest
you represent (i.e., interstate pipeline supplier), why the settlement has
benefits for your class of interested party and that you assert that these
benefits lead to the conclusion that the settlement is, on balance, in the
public interest.

Thanks.  Call me directly if you have any questions.  Mike Day

 <<CALPIN~2.DOC>>  <<x08657.doc>>  <<x08940.doc>>  <<DECLAI~1.DOC>>

 - CALPIN~2.DOC
 - x08657.doc
 - x08940.doc
 - DECLAI~1.DOC


you are such a crack up - good thing I like you so much, or I'd kneecap you
the next time you are in Portland.  My mother accepts your profuse apologies
and is eternally grateful!

Best,
Lysa

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/16/2000 01:35 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Regarding Reserving the Park Hyatt for the California
Legislative Meeting

Dear LYSA:

I can only apologize profusely.

Profuse apologies,
Jeff

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	11/16/2000 01:10 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Regarding Reserving the Park Hyatt for the California Legislative
Meeting

Jeff -

I am more than happy to work with the Park Hyatt to reserve a room.

However, I will only do it on the condition that you make a concerted effort
to spell my name correctly.
My mother would greatly appreciate you acknowledging the vast amounts of
drugs she was on when she filled out my birth certificate!!  :-)

Consider it done.

With mucho giggles,
Lysa

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/16/2000 01:12 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CHANGE OF DATE: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco
- MARK YOUR CALENDARS!!

Lisa:  Sorry, but Joseph's gone on vacation for the week.  I think that the
size of the group is going to require that we do this offsite.  We use the
"Park Hyatt" in San Francisco.  Could you check with Paul and let him know
that I think that we need to go offsite, given the size of the crowd, and if
he agrees, could you go ahead and check into getting a room at the Park
Hyatt?  As always, I'm greatly indebted.  If there are any problems, or if
you have any questions, don't hesitate to give me a call.

Best,
Jeff

	Lysa Akin@ECT
	11/16/2000 10:37 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron, mcortez@govadv.com, Sue Nord/NA/Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron
		 cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT
		 Subject: CHANGE OF DATE: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco -
MARK YOUR CALENDARS!!

Per Rick Shapiro, pllease be advised that the meeting referenced above has
been changed as follows:

Date: Tuesday, December 5th
Time: 9:00am - 1:30pm Pacific
Where: San Francisco Office

At this time, Paul would prefer to keep this as an internal GA meeting with
our outside lobbyists.  At this time we are not inviting the Enron Business
units to attend, but please feel free to invite anyone else in the GA group
you feel should attend.

HOWEVER, if you invite someone else, please advise me so that we can ensure
we have adequate space in San Francisco to accommodate everyone.  Thanks!

Melissa Cortez - please forward to Scott AND Hedy.  Also, I will forward
directions to our offices to you under a separate e-mail.

Lysa Akin
503/464-7927

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/16/2000 08:35 AM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
11/14/2000 04:52 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron,
mcortez@govadv.com, Sue Nord/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron
Subject: California Legislative Meeting in San Francisco

Please be advised that I have scheduled the above referenced meeting as
follows:

Date: Tuesday, November 28th
Time: 10:30am - 3:30pm Pacific
Where: San Francisco Office

Most of you "penciled in" this appointment when I spoke to you, please make
plans to attend!!

At this time, Paul would prefer to keep this as an internal GA meeting with
our outside lobbyists.  At this time we are not inviting the Enron Business
units to attend, but please feel free to invite anyone else in the GA group
you feel should attend.  HOWEVER, if you invite someone else, please advise
me so that we can ensure we have adequate space in San Francisco to
accommodate everyone.  Thanks!

Melissa Cortez - please forward to Scott AND Hedy.

Jim Steffes & Marcia Linton - I am aware that Jim is on vacation the week of
the 27th.  In the event that he can participate via teleconference, I will
forward a dial in number by the end of the week.

Lysa Akin
503/464-7927


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 09:50 AM -----

	Taffy Milligan
	05/16/2000 09:19 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Form Review Meeting

Form review meeting will be held in EB38c2 on Wed., 5/17, a 9-10:30 a.m.


let's discuss exactly what needs to be done, we can choose a subset of the
currently approved names to get started.  have you spoken with louise?

To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Hard Facts Needed

Bryan -

In fact, in order to get this first list of 200 or so on the
non-transactional web page, we conducted only a very brief legal review in
Houston - th full review takes much longer since it involves input from a
variety of people.

Mark

Bryan Seyfried
02/27/2000 05:12 AM
To: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Eklavya
Sareen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Hard Facts Needed

I suggest choosing the reference credits for online trading from the already
approved reference credits which appear on EnronCredit.com.  My recollection
is that there currently is not a separate approval process from either a
credit or legal perspective.  Let's review everything for EOL prior to the
states getting to the office on Monday and get an email out with the list of
reference credits.

bs

David Forster
25/02/2000 14:49
To: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Hard Facts Needed

New reference entities - as with any other new Products, should be submitted
to the Product Control Group (Amita Gosalia).

The PCG will then be responsible for the text of the new Products and
obtaining the necessary approvals.

However, in accordance with our discussions with Bryan, EnronOnline will be
limited to 20 reference entities until after we have settled on the credit
derivatives update/volume requirements, which may or may not feed into a
phase 2 development of the EnronOnline site.

Dave

John Metzler
02/25/2000 11:30 AM
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Hard Facts Needed

Paul:

Will there be a different process for approving names as references on
EnronCredit.com (non web-trading) and EOL?

Furthermore, you, Edmund, Tomas  and I need to establish a process fro
regular and smooth approval of new reference names, a checklist if you will.

Meet this afternoon, before you depart?
My diary is open

David Forster
24/02/2000 18:40
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Eklavya Sareen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Hard Facts Needed

We are planning on having credit trading ready for EnronOnline launch on
March 8.

I believe the legal due diligence and credit due diligence is now complete.

The initial list of 50 customers have been approved for credit trading.

Of the 20 reference entities, only the following have been approved:

Reference Entity    Approval Status

Birka Energi AB     Approved
Graningeverkens A/B    Approved
London Electricity    Approved
Scottish and Southern Energy plc  Approved
Seeboard plc     Approved
Sydkraft AB     Approved
Cinergy Corp     Approved

The following have not been approved:

BC Group plc
Hyder plc
National Power plc
PowerGen UK
Scottish Power UK plc
Duke Energy Corp
Dynegy Inc.
El Paso Energy Corp
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
The Southern Company Inc
Lucent Technologies
Nortel Networks Corp
Reliant Energy Inc

Dave

Paul Simons
02/24/2000 06:14 PM
To: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Eklavya Sareen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT,
David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Hard Facts Needed

In Bryan's absence, please work together where necessary to let Mark Taylor,
Ed and me know/have the following as soon as possible so we can finalise our
legal due diligence before launch of online credit trading:

best estimate of the launch date for credit trading
the final list of counterparties
the final list of reference credits

Thanks

Paul


For the sake of completeness, attached is clean and redlined version the
amended and restated Transaction No. 2 Confirm which goes along with the
Capacity Release and Trailblazer Assignment docs.


Hi, Veronica!

I'm trying to clean some files off my desk and one of them is Bayer.  Are you still going to revise the credit?

Thanks!

Marie


<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<title>Stockscape Review</title>

        Volume 1, Issue 8 |
          October 23, 2001

          Dear Stockscape Review
            Subscriber,

As we continue our commitment to bringing our members only the best in Small Cap investment ideas, we are very excited to introduce Merilus, Inc. (OTC/BB MERH). This Company is setting the standard for affordable security in the lucrative Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) arena.

We invite you to forward this email on to your friends and associates, and ask them to check out our past Featured Companies: Energy Power Systems Inc. (OTC/BB: EYPSF), Pacific Magtron International Corp. (NASDAQ: PMIC), Cetalon Corp. (OTC/BB: CETA), and Pollution Research and Control Corp. (NASDAQ: PRCC).

                Merilus, Inc. (OTC/BB:
                  MERH)

Cyber-terrorism - A Very REAL Threat

            Merilus is helping agencies and corporations protect themselves against the increasingly ominous threat of "cyber-terrorist attacks"
            - breaches in network security that allow criminals to steal files and documents via their computers and the Internet. Merilus' leading-edge products
            give the piece of mind necessary to operate safely in a dangerous world.

The NEED for Security

Now more than ever, companies need to ensure their security. The Computer Security Institute, in conjunction with the FBI,
recently released a report stating that attacks on corporate computer systems have been increasing steadily since 1998.
A report issued by the American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS) and PriceWaterhouseCoopers found that Fortune 1000 companies lost $45 billion to theft of proprietary information
last year alone, with fully 90% of this proprietary data being in digital form. Merilus provides hardware and software to effectively deal with the problems of network security, and delivers these solutions at a tremendously attractive cost
to its customers.

Aggressive Marketing Strategy

The Company has spent the past 4 years concentrating its efforts on intensive research and product development.
Merilus now has in production a number of fully tested and independently verified products. The Company will now be shifting its focus to an aggressive business development, marketing and sales expansion.
Early response to Merilus' worldwide business development activities has been very positive, and the Company is working towards establishing a worldwide presence.

Leading Customers & Esteemed Awards

Merilus is proud to have its products in place at some of the world's strongest companies and organizations. Lockheed Martin, NASA, and the State of Vermont
are just a few of the customers who are putting their trust in Merilus. InfoSecurity News Magazine
recently awarded Merilus its prestigious 5-Star rating, and The Tech Zone called its product "a truly powerful combination of hardware and software," giving the product a score of 9.5 out of 10.

A Powerful Bottom Line

Merilus currently shows a 60% gross margin in their Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) hardware business, and an astounding 95% gross margin in their software business.
The Company's unique 2:1 cost feature ratio ensures that competitors cannot defend existing market share without drastically affecting their bottom line.  The Company projects sales of approximately $7.9 million in 2002, and is projecting revenues of $93.7 million by 2004.
By that time, Merilus expects to be cash flow positive and projects earnings of approximately $0.19 per share.

An Attractive Investment Opportunity

Merilus Inc. (OTC/BB: MERH) is well positioned to expand its position in this lucrative niche market. The aggressive sales and marketing expansion
will represent a tremendous opportunity for the Company and its shareholders. At this critical juncture in Merilus' development, it is a perfect time to consider MERH as a part of your portfolio.

Merilus Inc.

                          Stock Symbol:

MERH

                          Exchange:

OTC/BB

                          Market Cap:

$18.9 Million

                          Shares Outstanding:

13,500,000

                          Float (Estimated):

2,000,000

                          52 Week Range:

$0.45-$6.12

                          Average Daily Volume:

32,370

Stockscape (SS) Disclaimer: Please be aware that SS is a news service and NOT an investment advisory service; it is advised that you consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. This information comprises a paid advertising supplement for which SS was compensated. In the case of
            Merilus Inc., SS received payment of $30,000. This publication does not provide an analysis of a company's financial position and the information herein should NOT be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities. The information herein is taken from sources thought to be accurate, but there is no guarantee. All due diligence should be done by the reader or their financial advisor. Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

To unsubscribe, click Here


Kean, Kirby, Gibb, me.  Lots of fun.  Not.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: California Senate Formally Withdraws Contempt Actions Against Enron

Good work.  Who was Enron's negotiator in all of this?  GAC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Kingerski, Harry; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Blachman, Jeremy; Gahn, Scott; Belden, Tim; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Senate Formally Withdraws Contempt Actions Against Enron

Yesterday, we reached agreement with the Senate regarding the terms and conditions under which the company would provide information to Senator Dunn's committee investigating wholesale price spikes.
In return, Dunn agreed to have is committee formally withdraw all contempt actions against Enron.
This morning, Dunn convened his committee and the committee formally withdrew the contempt actions.
A story related to the deal is attached.
If you have any questions, just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Sanders, Richard B.; Dasovich, Jeff; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Schmidt, Ann M.
Subject:	Contempt articles

Enron agrees to provide files, averts Senate contempt finding
By Emily Bazar
Bee Capitol Bureau
(Published Sept. 14, 2001)
State lawmakers moved to drop contempt charges against Enron Corp. on Thursday after the energy marketer agreed to begin turning over thousands of pages of documents immediately.
The last-minute wrangling between Enron and a special Senate committee investigating energy price manipulation essentially brought to an end a series of extraordinary legislative proceedings that were last invoked in 1929.
Following hours of closed-door meetings, Enron signed an agreement in the early evening, allowing it to dodge an impending contempt finding by the full Senate and the possibility of stiff fines.
Under the deal, Enron will begin sharing records with the committee in exchange for a confidentiality agreement intended to protect its most sensitive documents after they are turned over.
"It took too long to bring this to resolution," said state Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, who chairs the committee. "I can't help but think it had to do with the pending sanctions for contempt."
As part of the deal, however, Enron did not agree to drop the lawsuit it filed in July asking the court to intervene on its behalf, said spokeswoman Karen Denne. She said the company is still considering its options.
"We're pleased they've agreed to withdraw the contempt charges," Denne said.
Enron -- and two other companies that managed to quickly purge the charges against them -- had been found in contempt in late June after it refused to turn over documents, violating subpoenas that the committee issued on June 11.
The subpoenas called for documents of all kinds, including those with specific details -- prices, quantities and capacity -- of the companies' transactions in the state's wholesale electricity market.
Enron officials balked at the request, saying they didn't want to turn over documents that might include confidential trade secrets.
Ultimately, the refusal to turn over documents brought the company perilously close to being found in contempt by the Senate.
Thursday morning, the Senate Rules Committee met to consider the committee's contempt recommendation and whether it should be forwarded to the full Senate, along with suggested punishments in the form of fines.
After an hour of finger-pointing and confusing allegations, Senate President Pro Tem John Burton sent the two sides into a conference room to work out their differences.
At 6 p.m., Enron officials signed the same confidentiality agreement that several other companies have signed.
Dunn said his committee will continue to meet throughout the fall and will inspect the documents that have been provided by energy companies.
In addition, the committee awaits records from several municipal utilities, including the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. SMUD was among 11 municipal utilities that recently received subpoenas from the committee requesting documents.

The Bee's Emily Bazar can be reached at (916) 326-5540 or ebazar@sacbee.com <mailto:ebazar@sacbee.com>.

Enron and state reach agreement on papers
The power company avoids a contempt order for files on electricity market.
September 14, 2001
By KIMBERLY KINDY
The Orange County Register
SACRAMENTO -- Enron Corp. signed a confidentiality agreement late Thursday that should allow for the release of thousands of documents to aid in a Senate investigation into the California electricity market.
The compromise apparently ends six months of stalled negotiations.
At stake for Enron was a move to hold the company in contempt and start assessing millions of dollars in fines.
The Senate Rules Committee on Thursday morning had delayed for a day a vote to consider asking the full Senate to hold Enron in contempt because the company has not turned over the subpoenaed documents.
While delaying the decision, Senate Leader John Burton, D-San Francisco, ordered attorneys from the Legislative Counsel of California, a Senate committee investigating electricity price gouging and Enron into a room to work out an agreement that would protect the security of confidential documents that contain trade secrets.
"Let's hope cooler minds prevail," said Rules Committee member Sen. Ross Johnson, R-Irvine, as the committee members moved to a conference room for a daylong meeting.
The contempt proceedings, for now, have been dropped, said Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, who chairs the Senate committee investigating price gouging and possible collusion in the electricity market.
Enron officials did not return calls seeking comment on the agreement late Thursday.
The state Senate today is also expected to consider a resolution that would order the nation's two largest public-employee pension funds to sell off stock of any company that is found in contempt by the Legislature.
The Legislative Counsel of California is recommending the action.
"It is not good public policy to hold stock in companies in contempt of the California Legislature and therefore in contempt of the people of California," said Dunn, who asked for the counsel's review and recommendation.

Enron agrees to turn over documents to Senate investigators
By Jennifer Coleman
ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 13, 2001
SACRAMENTO - Enron Corp. agreed Thursday to release company documents to a Senate committee investigating possible price manipulation, ending the committee's quest to cite the energy company for contempt for not complying with a subpoena.
The Senate Rules Committee heard arguments from Enron and the Senate Select Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market over whether the energy company should be found in contempt.
In June, the select committee subpoenaed Enron files as part of its investigation into record-high prices in the state's wholesale electricity market. Enron sued to quash the subpoena, a motion a judge rejected.
The judge agreed, however, that Enron was entitled to a protective order for documents revealing sensitive trading and financial information.
Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana, chairman of the select committee, said late Thursday that Enron agreed to the same confidentiality agreement accepted by several other generators. With that agreement, Dunn said, the committee would withdraw a report that recommended Enron be found in contempt.
He said he expects documents to be transferred immediately.
Dunn had argued the subpoena also covered nonconfidential documents, and since the energy company also refused to release those papers to the committee, it was in contempt.
He asked Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, chairman of the rules committee, to approve fines against Enron for each day they didn't comply with the subpoena. The daily fines would start at $1,000, doubling each day for 10 days. Then the company would be fined $1 million a day.
Enron lawyer Michael Kirby said the company had put 49,000 nonconfidential documents in a depository in Sacramento so committee investigators could review them.
But Dennis Murphy, a lawyer for the select committee, said Enron didn't tell investigators where the depository was located. The committee discovered the address in documents filed by Enron for the court case, he said.
"We've been trying to get into the depository for a week. They have not allowed our people in there to verify what documents are in there," he said.
Kirby disputed that, and blamed the committee for delays in turning over the balance of the documents. The two parties haven't met since the judge ordered the protective order, and Kirby said it was the committee that refused to work out the order's details.
Dunn said the law requires Enron to produce the documents before it was entitled to a protective order.
Sen. Ross Johnson, R-Irvine, said Dunn's push to have Enron found in contempt "smacks at this point of Enron being punished for exercising their right to go to court."
A contempt report on Reliant Energy has also been sent to the Senate. A contempt finding against Mirant Corp. was later reversed when the company opened a document depository in Sacramento for the committee's investigators.
If the full Senate imposes sanctions against Reliant or Enron, it will be the first time since 1929, when the Senate voted to jail reluctant witnesses during a committee investigation of price fixing and price gouging involving cement sales to the state.


We all have e-mail lists that include some people but not others.  We need
one master list to make sure that w/o the daily calls the information is
getting to the right people.

Marcia, could you please work to build one list that we can all copy?

Jim


I would like to receive the guide.  My location is 3138c.

Daren


Special Invitees,

Please launch your holiday invitation from Enron Net Works.

Liz Taylor
Assistant to Greg Whalley

---------------------- Forwarded by Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:17
PM ---------------------------
   Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC

From: Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC@ENRON on 11/07/2000 05:51
PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENW-Employees_Houston
cc:
Subject: ENW Holiday Party Invitation

Here it is!  Your Enron Net Works Holiday Party Invitation.  Please click on
the attached link to launch.

http://207.21.193.94/Extravaganza.html


Thanks Eric!

Would you prefer the pan seared filet (beef) or fettuccini/mushroom pasta?

Eric Linder
04/14/2001 09:30 PM
To: Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Hire Dinner invitations...

Grace,

I've marked my calander and plan to attend.

Thanks,

Eric


The staffing reductions that are planned for Houston based EGS employees over the next week are:
	ETS			less than 10
	EGS International	12
	EEOS			200

Nothing is planned for the International assets for the next week.  The International asset divestiture plans will continue as deemed appropriate.


Thanks!

kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Frito-Lay Special Provisions

Kim,

Attached are the Frito-Lay Special Provisions that include Jay's comments and my comments.  Please let me know if you need anything else.

Stacy

 << File: Frito Lay GISB Spec Prov.doc >>


I did get your page

From:	Dutch Quigley/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/02/2001 09:44 AM
To:	Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Good Morning

Just wanted to let you know that i am thinking of you
ILY
dq


Jere, please forward the list of targets. Let me speak initially with John -
lets try and get this done today.  I appreciate the effort on the peakers.
As well, I would suggest we start discussions with  Reeding & Bates which
according to both Redmond and Thompson is a live deal.

Thanks
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------

Jere C Overdyke
05/17/2000 07:48 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Producer Insurance Targets

I was out of town last week on vacation.  The peaker project is moving
ahead.  George Carrick and John met last week regarding upstream activities.
No final resolution. I have a voice mail in to John and will get things
worked out this week.  The most important issue is to get into market place
and test product with another transaction.

Jere


Jeff, thanks for your work on Bob's draft, however, for form management
purposes we are going to continue with our previous style which is to include
the crossborder annexes.

1.  Attached below is the ENA/US Annex A, which is the base GTC type of
document that we utilize with our confirmations when we do not have an ISDA
in place (definitions of parties are in the Confirmation).  If ENA contracts
with a Canadian party we use the Canadian Annex attachment (also attached
below) to the Confirmation and Annex A.  Where ENA contracts with a foreign
counterparty other than Canada, the Canadian Annex may be utilized with
additional legal scrubbing concerning the particular jurisdiction.  It is for
this reason that I think we should continue the more amplified approach
rather than targeting it toward just Canada/US.

2.  Attached below is the ECC/Canadian Annex A, which is the base GTC type of
document that we utilize with our confirmations when we do not have an ISDA
in place (definitions of parties are in the Confirmation).  If ECC contracts
with a US party we use the United States Annex attachment (also attached
below) to the Confirmation and Annex A.  Where ECC contracts with a foreign
counterparty other than US, the United States Annex may be utilized with
additional legal scrubbing concerning the particular jurisdiction.  It is for
this reason that I think we should continue the more amplified approach
rather than targeting it toward just Canada/US.

At your convenience, please review the Canadian and United States annexes and
advise of any comments.  Thanks again.

Note to Paralegals:  Please note that the annexes are now under current
forms.  If you have any questions about how they are to be utilized, please
stop by to discuss.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Can you tell me what master this was originally papered under?

Many Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 12/28/2000
08:18 AM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner@ECT
12/27/2000 08:09 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EOL WTI Historical Trade Simulation

Greg,

Here are results corrected for spread profit per round-trip transaction.
Prior results incorrectly counted a spread profit per trade.

Stinson


(See attached file: Beige Book.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - Beige Book.pdf


BRAWNER, SANDRA F,

The PEP system closes on Friday, May 25, 2001

Our records indicate that you have been requested to provide feedback on one or more Enron employees.  The deadline for completing feedback is Friday,  May 25th.

Below is a list of feedback requests with a status of "OPEN".  Please complete or decline these requests as soon as possible by logging into PEP at http://pep.enron.com and selecting Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.

If you have any questions, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  713-853-4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44 207 783 4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

Employee Name:
DE PAOLIS, TAMMI
FERRIES, NELSON
ROYED, JEFFREY


No I can't make it this weekend.  Are you making the trip?  The game's going
to be on ESPN2, so I'm thinking of having a basketball watching party.

Talk to you later,
Robin


I will be out of the office tomorrow and Thursday. Can we get together Friday morning to just review what you discuss.

Thanks,

Jarrod

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Phillips, Rebecca
Cc: Cyprow, Jarrod; Bailey, Susan; Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: FW: Clorox comments to the ISDA Master Agreement and Credit
Support Annex

Rebecca:

Per our conversation, attached please find Clorox's blackline.  You should have Aparna's file including the credit worksheet.  Also, Aparna should have provided you wtih a copy of the ISDA boilerplate (let me know if you need this or anything else).  The credit issues we should focus on include:

(1)  request for cross acceleration [Part 1(b) page 1]
(2)  Cross Default amendment for operational issues [Part 1(b) page 1]
(3)  Credit Event Upon Merger:  use of "materially weaker" definition [Part 1(c) pages 1-2]
(4)  Additional Termination Events:  use of rating downgrade Part 1(i) pages 2-3]
(5)  Delivery of documents [see page 5 comments]
(6)  elimination of "non-reliance" representation [pages 7-8]
(7)  elimination of affiliate setoff [pages 8-9]
(8)  Change to definiton of "Credit Support Amount" [Annex A page 1]
(9)  complete change to Threshold and Independent Amount [Annex A pages 2-3]
(10) "Minimum Transfer Amount" from $0 to $500,000
(11) elimination of the MAC in Par. 13 to the Credit Support Annex [Annex A page 8]
(12)  Enron Corp. guaranty:  elimination of cap [see Enron Corp. guaranty]

I look forward to meeting with you on Wednesday.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Cyprow, Jarrod
Subject: FW: Clorox comments

Sara,

Attached are Clorox's comments to our ISDA draft provided to them in April, 2001.

Jarrod Cyprow would like to schedule a meeting with you on Monday afternoon, October 22nd to discuss Clorox's comments.

Let me know if I may be of assistance.

Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: lori.pfaffmann@clorox.com [mailto:lori.pfaffmann@clorox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: Re: Clorox comments

Susan,
     Please let me know if this works.  It is a word document.
Lori(See attached file: Swap Agreement Comparison Document.DOC)

"Bailey, Susan" <Susan.Bailey@enron.com> on 10/17/2001 07:25:06 AM

To:   <lori.pfaffmann@clorox.com>
cc:

Subject:  Clorox comments

Lori,

Sorry for all the problems, but I am unable to open the attachment you
directed to Jarrod Cyprow.  Could you please try me again.

I look forward to your comments.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


What time should I meet you at your house on Saturday?  I'm not going to the reception tonight.  Shoot me back directions to your house.

-----Original Message-----
From: NGFC [mailto:tcooper@ngfc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:42 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:

I live in Hunters Glen....just east of 136th and Washington.  The
Club House is about 6 blocks from where I live so that is
good....walking distance if needed!!  The IPAMS reception is tonight
at Maggiano's from what I hear.  Are you going?
--
NGFC, tcooper@ngfc.com on 17/10/2001


good morning my love, i cannot oper it call me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Dana [mailto:Dana.Davis@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Frank Telemaque
Subject: Good Morning

    See if you can open this video clip.  Let me know.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

INSIST UPON GENUINE FLEXITALLIC GASKETS!
Anything else is just a copy.


Don't worry christi - I recognize what a great job your group did this year.   It was by far the best regulatory effort (from a power perspective) with more results than any of the previous 7 years I was at Enron.   You and your team deserve a great deal of credit and if we can keep this team together, we will reap the benefits for years to come.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:55 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Bentley, Corry; Baughman Jr., Don; Valderrama, Larry; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Rust, Bill; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	An Enron win against MISO!

While seemingly small in the scheme of things these days at Enron, on 12/14/01 EPMI did get a FERC win against MISO's proposed $1000 fee for each non-confirmed transmission service request for firm PTP of one week or longer.  FERC used our (In house written) argument almost verbatim!


Any feedback or interest?  Please let me know.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 02:08 PM
---------------------------

LaRence Snowden@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
03/05/2001 08:19 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks

Just a word of thanks for setting up the interviews last week.  I was
thoroughly impressed with the groups and saw several areas which I would like
to explore further.  I will be following up with Beth Apollo, Brenda Herod
and Brent Price to explore opportunities in their areas.  Again, thanks for
your kind gesture and even more so, thanks for meeting me at the suggestion
of Liz Taylor.

Regards,

LaRence B. Snowden
Enron Broadband Services - Structuring
(713) 853-5132


Here is the schedule for the Gleason plant and the confirms.  Please give me
a call if you have any questions.  Thanks
Ben


[IMAGE]
'CLICK 'CLICK 'CLICK

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] TrueAdvantage's Sales Intelligence (SI) Database contains over 1,000,000 prospects and is updated daily with new opportunities.   Access our ENTIRE database of sales intelligence at www.trueadvantage.com   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Prospect Smarter! Build your pipeline with qualified prospects and search by keyword, company name, and industry.  [IMAGE]  Target "high probability" prospects! These business are 10 times more likely to buy products and services. [IMAGE]  Purchasing Trends! Past buying opportunities are an excellent indicator of future needs. [IMAGE]  Hot leads! Target businesses that have an immediate need for your products and services.  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   Paul Thomas  Based on your selection of industries and categories, we have found the following leads for you.         [IMAGE]        Construction & Facilities > Site Construction > Replace/Repair of Water Mains/Sewer/Wastewater  WATER MANAGEMENT SCADA SYSTEM   CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2002 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS  ENGINEERING SERVICES TO DESIGN WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY   SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT   WASTEWATER LINES  WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION  SEWER EXTENSION  WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT  SEWER PLANT UPGRADE  STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS  PHASE 4 VALVE REPLACEMENT  SANITARY/STORM SEWER MODIFICATIONS  WATER MAIN SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION   Energy > Power & Fuels > Fuel, Petroleum & Kerosene Procurement  FUEL - ETHANOL (85% ETHANOL & 15% GASOLINE)         [IMAGE]         If you have any questions or comments call us at 1(888)508-8783 ext 2 or email customerservice@trueadvantage.com .  Disable email alerts . You may disable these email alerts at any time.   Copyright 2001 TrueAdvantage, All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer  Privacy Policy    [IMAGE]


---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/13/2000 05:02 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------

bill_morgan@kindermorgan.com on 12/13/2000 04:34:58 PM
To: kathy.mayfield@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

Thank you for the Charity Gift Card.  I decided to donate the gift to the
Depelchin Children's Center.


Michelle,

Per our conversation, attached is a draft of an amendment to the Master Firm
Purchase/Sale Agreement between IDACORP Energy Solutions, Inc. and Enron
North America Corp.  which changes the confirming party to ENA.

Please call me at (713) 853-5705 or e-mail me with your comments.

Stacy Dickson


Richard:

The corporate workbook reflects that the officers of Enron Credit, Inc. all
reside in the U.K.  I don't see anyone identified with a power of attorney
for executing documents in Houston.

As there may be tax issues associated with U.K. officers signing (in the U.K)
on behalf of a U.S. company, I am asking  for verification from Janine.

My suggestion is that Enron Credit Ltd. negotiate and execute the agreement
and include the usual "affiliates, representatives, etc." who may need to
know any confidential information.  Your V.P.'s are all in London.

If Janelle confirms that it's alright for Brown, Sherriff or Seyfried to sign
for Enron Credit, Inc. from London, then we can prepare the document and have
a V.P. sign and fax the agreement to the U.S. party.  At a minimum, though,
we should try to work from our form of NDA.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 04:11 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	02/15/2001 02:41 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement with Scana

It is not clear to me how we should handle this, what do you sugguest?  As a
note, I will be out of the office on Friday.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 02:40 PM -----

	Richard Sage
	02/15/2001 11:04 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement with Scana

Tana,
I guess we need to change the Enron legal entity from Enron Corp?
In our current model the transacting entity will be Enron North America
(which is a Delaware corporation?)
Can you then arrange a suitable signature (Haedicke?)
Can we get this done by the end of Friday?

Thanks,
Richard

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 15/02/2001 16:54
---------------------------

John Haggerty@ENRON
15/02/2001 15:14
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, David P
Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Richard, Craig told me you could review and sign this confidentiality
agreement, naturally it might need a little editing.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Haggerty/Corp/Enron on 02/15/2001
10:12 AM ---------------------------

"FOLK, JESSE C III" <JCFolk@scana.com> on 02/15/2001 02:30:48 PM
To: "'john.haggerty@enron.com'" <john.haggerty@enron.com>,
"'denis.o'connell@enron.com'" <denis.o'connell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

John and Denis--

Here is the proposed confidentiality agreement.  I wasn't sure about the
exact name for you, so I just put in the generic "Enron".  Let me know if
this is okay.

Call me if you have any questions, and I'm looking forward to reaching an
agreement with you.

Thanks.

Jay Folk
Trading Operations Manager
SCANA Energy Marketing, Inc.
803-217-1433 (Phone)
888-309-2859 (Mobile)
803-217-1455 (Fax)
jcfolk@scana.com (E-mail)

 - SEMI-Enron conf agreement.doc


Frank,

Did you receive the information about the San Marcos apartments.  I have left
several messages at your office to follow up.  You mentioned that your plate
was fairly full.  Are you too busy to look at this project?  As I mentioned I
would be interested in speaking to you as an advisor or at least a sounding
board for the key issues.

Please email or call.

Phillip Allen
pallen@enron.com
713-853-7041


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
02:12 PM ---------------------------

"Carlos Giron" <Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com> on 04/23/2001 01:48:45 PM
To: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com, Angela.teerwilliams@gte.net, Glenn@home.com,
Ralphmayers@hotmail.com, Yhaynes@mindspring.com, Mike.Kotar@psiusa.com,
ronniegiron@yahoo.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: snake

Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:45:14 -0500
From: "Bishop Keller" <BKeller@psiusa.com>
To: Carlos.Giron@psiusa.com
Subject:  snake
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="SNAKE.doc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="SNAKE.doc"

 - SNAKE.doc


Cara,
I've sure enjoyed getting you emails to will regarding the Workspace/Confirmation programs... most of your comments have been right on.  I keep having small anxiety attacks when I realize all of the tweaking we'll have for a while.

Onward through the fog.

Aquila - agree
Dukeenetra - DETM
Morgan - agree
Edison - agree
Avista - agree
The rest we don't have any contracts with as far as I know.

I'll have everyone back next week and re-do some of my testing on the workspace.

CB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	Bentley, Corry
Subject:	Changing short codes now to save us headaches later

Hi Corry,

Since the new sheets are going to be a little more fussy, and the alias thing harder to fix or maintain, I would like to get the enpower short codes changed to things that are more workable and make sense.

See how these grab you:

AQUILACORP -- AQUILA (The canadian ones can stay long for differentiation)

DUKEENENTRA- DUKE (But is there another Duke that is just Duke already?)

MSCAPGP - MORGAN

EDISONMISIM - EDISON

IDACORPENE - IDACORP

PINNACLEWE - PINNACLE

AVISTAENE - AVISTA

I have a few west specific ones, but wanted to check with you for these.

Lemmie know.

C


CONFIDENTIAL FILING: The information contained in the e-mail message below is strictly confidential.

Dear Ms Corona,

PROJECT NO. 22834: IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO RETAIL COMPETITION PILOT PROJECTS

Enron Energy Services; Inc. (EES) provides this status report on pilot project implementation in compliance with PUC subst. R. 25.431 (j) (34) (B). As a certified retail electric provider (REP), EES has participated in the pilot program of TXU Electric Company (TXU) since August 2001. EES is currently marketing to industrial customers in TXU's territory, and has enrolled 3 customers and 12 accoounts. In accordance with the above referenced rule, EES hereby files the following confidential justification report.

Respectfully submitted
Gloria Ogenyi Esq
Director, Government Affairs
Enron Corp.
Phone: 713-345-8202
Fax: 713-646-3409


Janine --

What's the gas delivery tariff on CGE for generation services?  Do they have a standard service?  Do they have a good generator interconnect agreement on the power side?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 10:22 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Boston, Roy; Nicolay, Christi L.; Jacoby, Ben; Cooper, Adam; Cisneros, Michelle D.
Subject:	CGE Gas Rate Case

Fyi...

CIncinnati Gas and Electric Company has filed for a $700 million rate increase which is enormous given the size of their company.  They are claiming that they need to replace their current low pressure gas system with a high pressure gas system and are looking to amortize the costs over ten years as opposed to the usual twenty years.  They plan to allocate the cost of this primarily through doubling the customer charge.  One of theories behind this rate increase is that Cinery wants to expand its business as an Exempt Wholesale Generator by building more gas fired turbines and it needs the high pressure gas to serve those turbines.  The concern therefore is whether captive ratepayers might be cross-subsidizing a competitive activity.


Paul,

Enron has received Hanover,s e-mail (with attached spreadsheet) with regard
to requested changes in the contract.  Please be advised, that Enron views
this contract as a long term contract and not a "let,s get started"
agreement. Our interpretation of the existing contract is significantly
different than Hanover,s.  We would be willing to sit down and discuss the
existing contract and your comments concerning the contract.    Please feel
free to call me with any questions or comments you may have.   Thanks

Ken Choyce


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042411.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 132.77 / Final: 132.70)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Thanks Gus.

Don, I don't believe it's critical to send an update.  We can cover by verbal
discussions tomorrow.

Mitch

From: Gus Eghneim on 12/06/2000 03:57 PM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
cc: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gus
Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re:

Mitch - I took out the first sentence from your answer to question #1. The
CFR you wanted to refer to is part 60 and not part 75. In any case, I really
do not think that the part 60 NSPS Subpart GG  limit of 98 ppm applies during
startup and shut down. I believe that we are covered by the provisions of
part 60 Subchapter A, Section 60.11(d) which calls only for good air
pollution control practice to minimize emissions during startup and shutdown.

No short term emission limits apply during startup and shutdown. The only
issue with startup and shut down emissions is that they get counted toward
your total emissions for the year, and you certainly covered this issue in
your last paragraph to question #1.

The revised file is attached.

Gus


TO: All New York Mercantile Exchange Members

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE: CFTC Approves Amendments to Natural Gas Price Limit Rules

DATE: December 7, 2000

Notice # 00-419

______________________________________________

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., has received permission from the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to expand the initial price limits of
its natural gas futures contracts; create uniform limits across all months of
trading; abbreviating the trading halt; and expand the new limits by 200%
when the initial limit is reached.

The amended rules, which are attached, will take effect for the opening of
the open outcry tading session at 9:30 AM tomorrow.

The Exchange announced this morning that the board last night voted to amend
the procedures so the new natural gas limit will be $1.000 per million
British thermal unit and if any contract month is traded, bid, or offered at
the limit for five minutes, the market is halted for 15 minutes.  When
trading resumes, expanded limits are in place that allow the price to
fluctuate by $2.000 in either direction of the previous day's settlement
price.

Currently, the market is halted for one hour if the price in one of the first
two months is traded at $.750 for five minutes.  When the market reopens,
those limits are extended to all months, but are moved to surround the
previous limit in place in the direction of the move.

Under the amended rules, if a halt occurs during the last two days of trading
in a contract, when the market reopens, there are no price limits placed on
either of the first two nearby contract months.

NATURAL GAS: APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO PRICE FLUCTUATION LIMIT RULES

The rules below reflect the provisions that are being implemented.  A copy of
the rules reflecting the changes made from the prior version of these rules
can be obtained from the Exchange,s Legal Department.

Rule 220.08. PRICES AND MINIMUM FLUCTUATION SIZE

(A) Prices shall be quoted in dollars and cents per million British thermal
units (MMBtu). The minimum price fluctuation shall be $.001 per MMBtu.

Rule 220.08A. SPECIAL PRICE FLUCTUATION LIMITS  FOR NATURAL GAS FUTURES

(A) Initial Price Fluctuation Limits for All Contract Months. At the
commencement of each trading day, there shall be price fluctuation limits in
effect for each contract month of this futures contract of $1.00 per MMBtu
above or below the previous day,s settlement price for such contract month.

(B)(1) Triggering Event and Temporary Trading Halt. If a market for any
contract month is traded or, is bid in the case of upward price moves or is
offered in the case of downward price moves, for five (5) minutes
consecutively at the upper or lower price limit, as applicable, then a
Triggering Event will be deemed to have occurred.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this rule, as a result of such Triggering
Event, the market will be given notice immediately that in two (2) minutes,
there will be a fifteen (15) minute temporary trading halt in all contract
months of that futures contract and the associated option contract
("Temporary Trading Halt"). The market will remain open during this
two-minute notice period, and the commencement of the Temporary Trading Halt
shall not be affected by market activity occurring during this notice period.

(3) Expansion of Limits Following Temporary Trading Halt. Following the end
of the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, the market shall reopen in all
contract months of this futures contract.  When trading resumes, price
fluctuation limits for each contract month, except as otherwise provided in
this rule, shall be expanded to $2.00 per MMBtu above and below the previous
day,s settlement price for such contract month;

provided that if such Temporary Trading Halt occurs on either of the last two
days of trading in the current delivery month, when trading resumes, there
shall be no price fluctuation limits in effect for the remainder of the
trading day both for the current delivery month and for the next nearest
contract month to delivery.

(4) Following resumption of trading after a Temporary Trading Halt, there
shall be no additional trading halts and no further expansion of price limits
for the remainder of the trading day.

(C) Duration of Session Following Temporary Trading Halt.   When trading
resumes after a Temporary Trading Halt, trading generally shall continue
until the regularly scheduled closing time subject to the following
exceptions:

1) if, at the start of the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, there is less
than 15 minutes
before the close, then, when trading resumes after the Temporary Trading
Halt, the trading session shall be expanded as necessary to provide for
fifteen (15) minutes of trading following the resumption of trading, and the
closing period shall be the final two minutes of trading of this 15-minute
period of trading;

2) provided however that if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed
during  the
closing period (on any day other than the last day of trading in the current
delivery month), there shall be no Temporary Trading Halt for any contract
month and no expansion of price limits for any contract month; and

3) provided further that if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed
during  the
closing period on the last day of trading in the current delivery month,
following the 15-minute Temporary Trading Halt, trading shall resume for
thirty (30) minutes for all contract months. In such circumstances, the
closing range for the current delivery month shall include both the period
from the start of the closing range to the start of the Temporary Trading
Halt as well as the 30-minutes of trading following resumption of trading.

(D) Application of Price Fluctuation Limits to NYMEX ACCESSc  The limits
described in this rule shall apply to trading on NYMEX ACCESSc, except as
provided by NYMEX Rule 6.56 and except that:

(1) if the five-minute Triggering Event is completed during the last ninety
minutes of a NYMEX ACCESSc trading session, there shall be no Temporary
Trading Halt and no expansion of price limits during the remainder of such
NYMEX ACCESSc trading session, and

(2) there shall be no Temporary Trading Halt during a NYMEX ACCESSc trading
session if, in the opinion of the President of the Exchange or his designee,
either the Triggering Event was not reflective of otherwise prevailing market
conditions or a Temporary Trading Halt is unwarranted.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-419)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.