Dabhol lenders to vote today on PPA PPPPA termination
Business Standard, 05/16/01

Enron to suspend investments of 600 mln usd in Brazil energy sector
AFX News, 05/15/01

USA: Sempra unit to boost natgas delivery to California.
Reuters English News Service, 05/15/01

Enron Urges Reforms In Japan Electricity Market-Nikkei
Dow Jones International News, 05/15/01

Enron Agrees to Provide Market Data to NGX
PR Newswire, 05/15/01

UAE To Seek New Partners If Enron Exits Dolphin Gas Proj
Dow Jones International News, 05/15/01

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)
Bloomberg, 05/15/01

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)
Bloomberg, 05/15/01

Dabhol lenders to vote today on PPA PPPPA termination
Our Banking Bureau Mumbai

05/16/2001
Business Standard
1
Copyright (c) Business Standard

The 25-odd lenders to the Dabhol power project will vote today on whether the
Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company (DPC) should be allowed to to serve a
preliminary PPA termination notice to the Maharashtra State Electricity Board
(MSEB). The voting will take place through conference calls criss-crossing
the globe at 6.30 pm, Indian Standard Time. Even though the three Indian
lenders_ the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI), the State Bank of
India (SBI) and ICICI_ have decided to vote against the proposition, they
will not be able to block the move.
Technically, the proposal can be passed if four per cent of lenders are in
favour of the termination notice. In effect, it will be passed if one of the
25 lenders casts its vote in favour of it. So, it's almost a foregone
conclusion that DPC will be asked to issue its termination notice.
Multilateral agency J-Exim, which has provided guarantees, will not
participate in the exercise. Barring J-Exim, other financial intermediaries
including global arrangers ABN Amro, Citi, ANZIB, CSFB and other banks and
OPIC will cast their votes tomorrow. "In the first round, Indian lenders put
their foot down and refused to give clearance to the termination notice.
Thistime around they will not be able to block the move any more. The Indian
lenders alone cannot save the controversial $3 billion as some of the foreign
lenders are in favour of issuing the termination notice," said a source. The
Indian lenders are in favour of completing the project without any time and
cost over-run. They have disbursed about 80 per cent of their Rs 1,500 crore
worth of loan commitments to phase II of the project, 93 per cent of which is
complete. The trial run is expected to commence in June. The board of the
Dabhol Power Company has already authorised Enron India managing director, K
Wade Cline, to serve a termination notice as and when he deems fit. At a
meeting of the lenders last month in London, the foreign lenders were keen
that the termination notice be served in the face of defaults by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and the Union government's refusal
to honour the counter-guarantee of Rs 102 crore for the December bill. The
domestic lenders are not covered by the counter-guarantee if the contract is
terminated. The foreign lenders are covered by the counter-guarantee.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron to suspend investments of 600 mln usd in Brazil energy sector

05/15/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

SAO PAULO (AFX) - Enron Corp will suspend investments of 600 mln usd in the
Brazilian energy sector, news agency JB Online quoted Enron vice-president
and Eletricidade e Servicos SA Elektro chairman Orlando Gonzales as saying.
Of the total investment, 500 mln usd was to be assigned to the expansion of
the thermoelectric plant Cuiaba II in the state of Mato Grosso, and in the
construction of Rogen in the state of Rio de Janeiro, with the remainder to
be invested in unit Elektro, it said.
"There are no clear regulations for the sector. Regulatory issues are holding
back investments," JB Online quoted Gonzales as saying.
Gonzales said the decision to suspend the investments may be reconsidered if
the energy sector regulator Aneel establishes clearer regulations.
mg/as
For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: Sempra unit to boost natgas delivery to California.

05/15/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

SAN FRANCISCO, May 15 (Reuters) - Southern California Gas Co. (SCG) said in a
statement on Tuesday it will add around 200 million cubic feet a day, or
about six percent, to its pipeline system by the end of the year in order to
meet the surge in demand for gas-fired power generation.
Today's announcement comes two months after SCG, a unit of Sempra Energy ,
proposed to increase capacity on its system by 175 mmcfd, or five percent.
Both projects will add around 11 percent of new gas capacity to its
transmission system this year, the company said in a statement.
In its latest proposal, called the Kramer Junction Interconnect, SCG said it
would build a 32-mile pipeline link to the Kern-Mojave pipeline system that
will allow it to deliver around 200 mmcfd into its system.
The new capacity would be enough to drive three 500-megawatt power plants or
enough gas to serve 1.4 million residential customers a day, the statement
said.
SCG, the nation's largest gas utility with more 18 million consumers in
central and Southern California, said utilization of its intrastate
transmission system in the past nine months had jumped from 75 percent to
over 95 percent, due largely to the rise in gas-fired power generation.
The company's announcement is the latest in several proposals to expand gas
pipeline capacity to California, where demand for gas is expected to jump
because of the number of gas-fired power plants being built or scheduled for
construction.
Gas is already used to generate about a third of California's electricity.
And since April 1999, the state has approved 13 major gas-fired power plant
projects with a combined generation capacity of more than 8,900 megawatts.
Nine gas-fired power plants, with a total generation capacity of more than
6,000 megawatts, are under construction.
Over the past two months plans to build or expand gas lines serving
California have been announced by Enron unit Transwestern, Williams Cos' Kern
River Transmission, El Paso Corp. units El Paso Natural Gas Co. and Mohave
Pipeline Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. unit National Energy Group,
Questar Corp. , Calpine Corp. , and Kinder Morgan .

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Urges Reforms In Japan Electricity Market-Nikkei

05/15/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

TOKYO (Nikkei)--Asserting that cuts in electricity prices will help Japanese
companies save as much as Y4 trillion, major U.S. energy firm Enron Corp.
(ENE) on Tuesday urged Japanese power firms to revamp the electricity market
by separating operations such as power generation, transmission and
distribution, The Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported.
Enron's 10-point proposal also calls for the construction of more power
plants and full-scale deregulation of retail electricity, including sales to
households. If such measures are carried out and electricity prices fall to
match the levels of other industrialized nations, Japan's industrial sector
could trim its costs by Y4 trillion, Enron said.
At a seminar on power industry deregulation hosted by Enron, the company
asserted that Japan's deregulation in such areas as wholesale electricity
auctions in 1996 and bulk retail sales last year has not brought significant
benefits to end-users.
New suppliers entering the market only account for a combined 0.4% of the
entire electricity sector, Enron said, criticizing the fact that power plant
facilities are mainly concentrated among electric power companies.
Regarding prices, an official representing operators of power generation
facilities asserted that "industrial-use electricity prices in Japan are
stuck at a high level at around Y13 per kilowatt, compared with Y5 in the
U.S., Y3 in Canada, Y9 in Germany and Y4-Y8 in Southeast Asia."
In fact, department store operator Takashimaya Co. (8233 or J.TKA), which
last November switched to new market entrants for part of its electricity
supply, was able to cut costs by Y450 million in the first year, said a
company official.
Enron hopes to generate competition by urging Japanese electric utilities to
spin off different operations, analysts say. If the number of power
generation facility operators increases, this will help bolster Japan's
electricity trading market, an area in which Enron has a strong business
interest.
Splitting electricity operations into generation, transmission and
distribution is expected to open the electric utility network to new
entrants. This will boost transparency in the fees that electric power
companies charge for transmitting power on behalf of the operators of power
generation facilities, Enron says.
Citing the power shortage in California, however, Japan's electricity sector
has strongly opposed such spin-offs, stating that generation and distribution
must be part of a single continuum to ensure a stable supply.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Agrees to Provide Market Data to NGX

05/15/2001
PR Newswire
(Copyright (c) 2001, PR Newswire)

CALGARY, May 15 /PRNewswire/ - NGX Canada Inc. (NGX), a wholly owned
subsidiary of OM AB (OM), today announced that an arrangement has been made
with Enron Canada Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp. (Enron),
whereby trading data from certain contracts listed on Enron's online trading
system, EnronOnline will be included in the computation of three Alberta Gas
Price Indices.
NGX acquired the AECO "C" & NIT Daily Spot, One-Month Spot, and Bid-Week Spot
gas price indices (Alberta Gas Price Indices) from Canadian Enerdata Ltd.
last September. Subsequent to the acquisition of the Alberta Gas Price
Indices, NGX has provided real-time information to its customers on the
establishment of the weighted average price indices based on transactions
conducted through NGX's trading system. Canadian Enerdata Limited continues
to publish the Alberta Gas Price Indices in the Canadian Gas Price Reporter.
Peter Krenkel, President of NGX, stated, "We believe that inclusion of data
from EnronOnline will serve to make our price indices among the best in North
America. The industry has been very supportive of the visibility and
integrity we are able to bring to the Alberta Gas Price Indices, which
removes the guesswork around gas price index methodology. However, after
reviewing the matter with Enron and other industry participants, we
recognized that Enron had legitimate concerns and the industry felt that
"more is better". The inclusion of data from the highly liquid EnronOnline
system should improve the quality of our price indices even further."
Rob Milnthorp, President and CEO of Enron Canada commented, "We are very
pleased to have EnronOnline transactions included in the Alberta Gas Price
Indices. This will provide industry participants with a more comprehensive
source of data and a better opportunity to manage risk around these price
indices as they are now assured that all their transactions on EnronOnline
will be included in the computation of the Alberta Price Indices."
The inclusion of EnronOnline data satisfies the principal claims made by
Enron in their legal action against NGX, Canadian Enerdata Ltd., OM and
Richard Zarzeczny and Enron has agreed to discontinue the legal action
against those parties with the conclusion of this arrangement.
NGX and Enron are planning to implement the necessary system changes by
August 1, 2001 but in any event will provide at least thirty days notice to
the industry. Once in operation, data from transactions in the relevant
contracts listed on EnronOnline will be fed to NGX in real-time. The
methodology for computing the Alberta Gas Price Indices will continue to be
on a weighted-average basis.
NGX will engage independent auditors to insure full compliance with the Index
Methodology Guide. This guide is available on NGX's website at www.ngx.com.
NGX located in Calgary, Canada provides electronic trading and clearing
services to natural gas buyers and sellers at seven markets in Canada. Over
the past six years, NGX has grown to serve over 120 customers with trading
activity averaging 225,000 TJ's per month. NGX is owned 100% by OM
(www.om.com).
OM is a leader in providing products and services in the field of transaction
technology. The company, with assets exceeding CDN $700 million, operates
exchanges in Calgary, London and Stockholm and develops technology that
increases the efficiency of financial and energy markets throughout the
world. OM is listed on Stockholmsborsen (ticker symbol "OM").
Enron Corp. is one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas and
communications companies. The company, with revenues of U.S. $101 billion in
2000, markets electricity and natural gas, delivers physical commodities and
financial risk management services to customers around the world, and has
developed an intelligent network platform to facilitate online business.
Fortune magazine has named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six
consecutive years. Enron's Internet address is www.enron.com. The stock is
traded under the ticker symbol "ENE".
Canadian Enerdata Ltd. (www.enerdata.com) located in Markham Ontario has been
providing information services to the North American energy industry for over
17 years. Enerdata publishes the Canadian Gas Price Reporter, PriceLine
Daily, Natural Gas Market Report and Canadian Energy Trends. Enerdata also
sponsors GasFair & Power, Canada's largest natural gas and electricity market
conference and trade show, now in its 11th year. SOURCE NGX Canada Inc.

/CONTACT: Enron Corp. - Mr. Eric Thode, Director of Public Relations,
713-853-9053; NGX Canada Inc.- Mr. Peter Krenkel, President, 403-974-1705; OM
- Ms. Anna Eriksson - Vice President Corporate Communications, +46 (8) 405 66
12; Canadian Enerdata Ltd. - Mr. Richard Zarzeczny, President, 905-479-9697/
11:17 EDT

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UAE To Seek New Partners If Enron Exits Dolphin Gas Proj

05/15/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

DUBAI -(Dow Jones)- If U.S.-based Enron Corp. (ENE) pulls out of the $3.5
billion Dolphin gas project, in which the company holds a 24.5% stake, the
U.A.E. Offsets Group, or UOG, will consider other companies to replace it, a
United Arab Emirates industry source close to the project said Tuesday.
Industry sources Monday said Enron is considering withdrawing from the
project because it doesn't believe it will be profitable.
Dolphin, an agreement signed two years ago by UOG and Qatar Petroleum, plans
to bring 2 billion cubic feet a day of natural gas from Qatar's offshore
North Field to Abu Dhabi and onward to Dubai.
Enron and TotalFinaElf (TOT) each hold a 24.5% stake in the project, while
UOG owns the remaining 51%.
Enron is set to focus on the midstream part of the project - gas
transportation - which requires building a 350-kilometer pipeline from a
processing plant in Ras Laffan, Qatar, to the Taweelah terminal in Abu Dhabi
and the Jebel Ali terminal in Dubai.
The U.A.E. source said originally, it was thought that the U.A.E. government
would fund the pipeline, which is estimated to cost around $1 billion.
However, more recently, the source said the U.A.E. suggested that Enron put
up the money itself.
Other industry sources said Enron and TotalFinaElf also had to pay
significant fees to join the project. TotalFinaElf will
operate the upstream part of the project, which includes developing
natural gas reserves in two blocks of the North Field. First wells are
scheduled to be drilled in the second half of 2001 and come onstream in
2005.

Last week, the Middle East Economic Survey reported that the foreign partners
haven't yet agreed on the precise details of their working relationship or on
the price of the pipeline.
Qatar Petroleum and Dolphin Energy Ltd., a subsidiary of UOG, signed an
initial agreement in March for the upstream section of the project. A full
agreement is expected to be concluded in September, the source said.
-By Dyala Sabbagh, Dow Jones Newswires; 9714 331 4260;
dyala.sabbagh@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)
2001-05-15 16:35 (New York)

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)

     (Updates with closing share prices.)

     Washington, May 15 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp. should sell
Portland General Electric Co. to Oregon so state consumers can be
insulated from soaring electricity prices, a congressman said.
     ``Purchasing PGE would give Oregon ratepayers more control by
keeping its assets in Oregon, accountable solely to Oregonians,''
U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio, a Democrat from Springfield,
Oregon, said in a letter to Governor John Kitzhaber.
     The governor is considering DeFazio's proposal, said
Kitzhaber spokesman Kevin Smith.
     Last month, Houston-based Enron, the biggest energy trader,
agreed to cancel the $3.1 billion sale of Portland General, a
utility with more than 700,000 Oregon customers, to Sierra Pacific
Resources of Reno, Nevada.
     Enron and Sierra Pacific blamed laws spawned by high power
prices and electricity shortages in the West for the sale's
collapse.
     ``We are pleased to keep Portland General in our asset
portfolio because it's a solid earnings performer,'' Enron
spokeswoman Karen Denne said. ``If approached by a buyer who
recognizes its value, we'd consider selling it.'' She declined to
comment on a potential bid by Oregon.
     The state should act swiftly, DeFazio said, citing press
reports that the U.K.'s Scottish Power Plc, owner of PacifiCorp,
the largest utility in the U.S Northwest, may bid for Portland
General.
     Scottish Power, based in Glasgow, Scotland, would have more
than 70 percent of Oregon electricity customers if it added
Portland General, raising ``serious regulatory concerns about
market power,'' he said.

                            Bond Issue

     Oregon could issue bonds to purchase Portland General, using
the utility's profits to pay the debt, DeFazio said. The state
might run it as a public utility or a cooperative, he said.
     Enron and Sierra Pacific called off the Portland General sale
because of laws passed by Nevada and California legislators that
slow the deregulation of their wholesale power markets.
     California and Nevada have blocked sales of power plants by
utilities. Sierra Pacific had to sell a stake in a Nevada power
plant that sells power to California to win regulatory approval of
the Portland General purchase.
     Average power prices on the California-Oregon border this
year have soared ninefold to $296.34 a megawatt hour over the year-
earlier period. A megawatt hour can light 750 average California
homes for an hour.
     Shares of Enron fell $1.76 to $$56.99. They've fallen 31
percent this year.
     Sierra Pacific rose 9 cents to $16.09. Scottish Power rose 9
pence to 492 ($7) in London.

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)
2001-05-15 16:26 (New York)

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)

     (Adds closing share price.)

     Houston, May 15 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the world's
biggest energy trader, agreed to provide natural-gas pricing
information to NGX Canada Inc. and drop a C$100 million
($64.7 million) suit against the Canadian gas exchange.
     Enron sued NGX in November after the Internet exchange, a
unit of the company that owns the Stockholm Stock Exchange,
changed providers of its gas-pricing data and didn't include
trades on EnronOnline, Enron's Internet exchange, when calculating
gas-price indexes.
     Calgary-based NGX agreed to include EnronOnline trades in
calculating its Alberta Gas Price Indices by August, Enron
spokesman Eric Thode said.
     NGX, owned by Stockholm's OM Gruppen AB, is used by about 90
percent of Canadian gas traders, and many traders use EnronOnline
to sell gas from western Canada, the biggest supplier of the
cleaner-burning fuel to the U.S.
     Houston-based Enron fell $1.76 to $56.99.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for BRCM  follows from EquityAlert.com.     Prudencial Securities Is Increasing Broadcom Corp. 2001 Estimate To -0.31 From -0.33     (RealTimeTraders.com) - Prudencial Securities Is Increasing Broadcom Corp. (BRCM) 2001 Estimate To -0.31 From -0.33 Copyright(c) 2001 RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	[IMAGE]     [IMAGE]


-----Original Message-----
From:  Seigle, Clayton
Sent: 31 May 2001 09:57
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Schroeder Jr., Don; White,
Bill; Wilson, John L.; Danaher, Patrick; Fuller, Robert; Goughary, Jim;
Mulholland, Sarah; Mahoney, Chris; Thomas, John Buckner; Koller, Ross;
Hickerson, Gary; Bradley, Michael W.; Scott, Eric; Maffett, Randal; Spencer,
John; Slovenski, Richard; De La Ossa, Mario; Berkeland, Bill; Jackson, Lee
Cc: Tholan, Scott; Johnston, Robert
Subject: Iraq Update
Sensitivity: Private

As expected, it looks like the US and UK have accepted the fact that the
sanctions cannot be restructured before the June 3 deadline.  We still expect
the UN to extend the oil-for-food program for six months, meaning little to
no Iraqi disruptions in June.

However:  sources close to the UN report that Washington and London are still
pushing hard for a shorter extension (1-2 months) of the program.  If they
get their way on this issue, expect the Iraqis to say some bullish things in
response (like they will not participate in the next phase of the
oil-for-food program).  This might not be immediately bullish for WTI, but
would set the stage for support as the market anticipates the end of the
short extension a month or two down the road.


Kim and Eric:
Could we send to ArcLight the models for TransPecos and Sun Devil that reflect what we had in today's presentation? You can either send directly to him (and cc me) or send to me and I will forward on to them.  Everyone did a great job today.  Thanks again.
Kevin


Stacy Lee 4327, Greg Hathaway 4421, (credit) Joan Armstrong 4250


Dorie and Michelle,

	This will update you on the latest developments.  Bob and I are working on finding a solution that resolves all the issues, which get complex, due to the fact that not only has the Hilton made claims against Enron, but also against Event Resources in the bankruptcy proceeding.  In other words, even if we succeed in facing down the Hilton on its claims directly against us, the Hilton may be able to recover some percentage of those claims directly from Event Resources in the bankruptcy proceeding, reducing the overall amount other creditors, such as Enron, can recover from Event Resources.  You will recall that Enron is trying to recover $225,000 that it advanced to Event Resources for the 2000 ENA Holiday Party.

	Bob will be speaking with Cindy Olson, his client, about what she would be willing to do in the way of future events.

	Once he hears back,  we will speak with you about the best way of resolving the Hilton's claim against us for the Torrey Pines/La Jolla event, which the Hilton's attorney appears more interested in than the Hilton's claim against Enron for the San Antonio/Palacio Del Rio event.  This is reportedly because the Hilton was actually provided the services for the Torrey Pines/La Jolla event.  As you know, we actually paid Event Resources for that event, and think we have a good position regarding not having to pay anything further.  Again, however, we need to keep in mind (a) if the Hilton sues us directly, we will incur attorneys' fees even in successfully defending the claim (perhaps we could file a dec. action to offset that risk) and (b) the Hilton clearly has a great claim against Event Resources for the Torrey Pines/La Jolla event, putting at risk some portion of the $225,000 we are seeking to recover.

	Also, please be advised that George Neeson, a Hilton v-p in charge of building infrastructure contracts, has recently contacted Ron Menton of EES, which has several such contracts with the Hilton, asking that Menton ensure that this matter be given the proper attention so that it can be resolved.  I have already spoken to Ron about this and will also speak with his EES attorney, Sarah Dietrich.  According to Menton, Neeson is not indicating that our legal issues are imperilling any present or future deals, and Menton (in response to my specific question) is not taking the position that we have to resolve these issues other than based on our own straight-up legal analysis.

	 I will keep you advised.

	Britt


Here are my comments on the Draft Permits:

1.  EPA did not include the stain tube request for sulfur monitoring.  The
methods that are currently listed are wet chemistry methods.  As we
discussed, since the permit allows us to use an APPROVED, alternate method,
we will need to submit this request at some time.  For the time being, since
we want to receive this permit ASAP we should be able to accept the permit as
is.
2.  It is my understanding that the limits given on CO and NOx are based on
ppm @ 15% O2 and not going to the full ISO conversion.  We may want to double
check that with the agency.   Arnold -- Do we have guarantees from GE to back
up these limits?
3.  The responsible official should be Dan Pribble.

Ruth

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Campbell, Larry
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Jensen, Ruth; jfields@argentinc.com
Cc: Shafer, John; Kendrick, William; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Martens, Donna;
Jerry D. Martin@enron.com
Subject: Draft Permits for Stations 3 and 4

The EPA has posted the draft permits for C/S 3 and 4 on their web page for
review. To review each permit go to
http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/epssdata.htm .  Click on the first
yellow bullet and drill move down to Arizona, then click the yellow button
for US EPA.  This will make available the files which are labeled
Transwestern Pipeline Company Klagetoh Compressor Station and Transwestern
Pipeline Company Luepp Compressor Station.  For each file, click on the field
labeled "link permit conditions". this will present the draft permit
conditions.  Due to the urgency of each permits review, Id like comments from
Jon and Ruth to me by tomorrow prior to the afternoon phone call I will have
with the state of Arizona over the draft conditions for the permits for C/S 1
and 2.


David,

Yes, I got some cash for you.
Please, give me a call Tuesday.

Vince

"Walkup, David C (HOUSTONAS AS 582)" <dwalkup@pclient.ml.com> on 12/04/2000
08:32:44 AM
To: "'Vincent Kaminski'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Options

Good morning, Vince.

Just touching base with you.  Are you ready to deposit some money and start
looking at some equity investments?  EM me or call and we can get together.
David C. Walkup
Sr. Financial Consultant
713-658-1685
800-456-9712
____________________________________________________________

CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.  For your protection, avoid sending
identifying information, such as account, Social Security or card numbers to
us or others.  Further, do not send time-sensitive, action-oriented
messages, such as transaction orders, fund transfer instructions, or check
stop payments, as it is our policy not to accept such items electronicall


fyi, on a different note, given legislative approval of frozen tariff
application in SDG&E, we are determining best course of action.  Will follow
up with you shortly.
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 05/16/2001
08:44 AM ---------------------------

James D Steffes@ENRON
05/15/2001 06:42 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Final Commission Decision on 3c/kwh Rate Design

The CPUC voted out the decision today on the 3c/kwh Surcharge late today.  We
are reviewing and will have a final analysis early tomorrow.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001
06:40 PM ---------------------------

JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 05/15/2001 06:15:49 PM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<James_D_Steffes@enron.com>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)"
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, "Scott Stoness (E-mail)" <sstoness@enron.com>,
"Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>, "Sue Mara (Business Fax)"
<IMCEAFAX-Sue+20Mara+40+2B1+20+28415+29+20782-7854@GMSSR.com>, "Tamara
Johnson (E-mail)" <tjohnso8@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Final Commission Decision on Rate Design

At the continuation meeting held this afternoon, the Commission voted out
the Alternate Proposed Decision on SCE/PG&E rate design.  The vote was 3 to
2, with Bilas and Duque voting "no".

Absent a close reading (which I have not had the opportunity to do yet), it
is difficult to discern all the changes made to the alternate as it was not
put out in a red-lined form.  While the version voted out today contains a
lot more verbiage supporting the previously made resolutions of the issues,
the only real substantive changes made appear to be (1) it lowers the cap on
agricultural customers rate increases from 30% to 20% for agricultural TOU
customers, and to 15% for agricultural non-TOU customers; and (2) it places
an average rate increase cap on industrial customers.  For PG&E, this
average rate increase cap is 12.3 cents/kWh; for SCE its $12.9 cents/kWh.
The decision does not contain alot of explanation on the industrial cap.  I
am assuming that the "average rate increase" refers to the average across
TOU periods.

I will review the Decision more closely, providing a complete summary
tomorrow.  In the mean time, if you have any questions, please call.

Jeanne Bennett


For the 6th, I borrowed 19,903 dth from EGHP (deal 1158684) and I must pay the all the gas back by Friday (deal 1158685).  Since we are borrowing the gas first, we should path this gas on contract # EGHP IT Loaning - 001.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hilliard, Marlene
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:45 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: Egan Hub Partners contracts

These two new offered service have been setup for Egan Hub.

I have called to have the server bounced.  It will take about 15-20 minutes.  Then you can set up the deals in Sitara.

Let me know if you have any problems.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:23 AM
To:	Hilliard, Marlene
Cc:	Ramirez, Robert; Fletcher, Brenda H.
Subject:	Egan Hub Partners contracts

What do you guys think about the following set ups for the Egan park and loan contracts?

			Parking				Loaning
Pipe Code		EGHP				EGHP
Firmness		IT				IT
Service Type		Interruptible Parking Service	Interruptible Loaning Service
Rate Schedule		IPS				ILS
Term			Term				Term
Contract #		EGHP IT Parking - 001		EGHP IT Loaning - 001


Wes,

Thank you for the BD wish.   I appreciate it more than you know.  I have been
in a real funk lately and  special thoughts help alot.
Have a nice weekend.  Again , Thanks.   Also "THANKS" for the market help
today with Transco zone 1.

Warmest Regards,
Sandra


Here 'tis.  I don't think it compared the charts, but it found lots of other
things to compare.

Kay


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042804.txt


Sharen had already alerted me to the first deal, which I changed, but not the
second. That deal has been changed as well now.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:06 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Jeff Richter Index Deals-error

Hi Kate,

I spoke with Jeff Richter this morning and the index sleeve he did on
yesterday with EES (deal 533084) and Sempra(deal 533085) is incorrect in
Enpower.  He said he would change the publication code to reflect Dow Jones
SP-15 Peak instead of Dow Jones NP-15 Peak on both of these deals.

Can you please check with Jeff to see what the status is on these changes.
The EES deal has been changed. The Sempra deal has not been changed.

Thanks!!


I have not taken any time off.

Thanks,
Robin


Please find attached this week's publication of the Global Markets Monitor
for 08 December 2000.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda and
Gwyn Koepke


Will do, I'll send you a copy too.  I'm just waiting to get Sara's direction
on one comment to the Legal Opinion, then I'll be ready to send it out.

	Janelle Scheuer
	10/03/2000 09:57 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYPA

Hi Tana....When you email the comments to Bill, ca you please email them to
my contact as well.....Carey.M@NYPA.gov
.....thanks!


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


Please see attached

Regards,
Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Hey babe:
Any chance there are copies of the Nightline and/or Frontline shows lying around??


Note:  The FERC meeting is today.  See the link below that can be checked for
updates.

Enron's Lay Urges Bold Solutions to Power Market Woes

As the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission prepared to weigh in this morning
with the federal government's answer to California's be-deviled power market,
free market advocates issued last minute warnings against taking the price
cap route espoused by the Cal-ISO. FERC's meeting is scheduled to start at 9
AM EST. (Check http://intelligencepress.com this morning for updates)

In a letter fired off to FERC Chairman James J. Hoecker yesterday, Enron CEO
Kenneth Lay urged the Commission to find a fix for the underlying structural
problems in the power market rather than follow the steps of policy makers
who have placed "price cap 'band aids' over hemorrhaging wounds."

Lay told Hoecker the power market is "halfway across a busy street in its
transition from monopoly to competition. It can't stand where it is." He said
FERC has to make a choice between falling into the "same trap of political
expediency as California's ISO, leaving the nation's electric system in the
lurch from one crisis to the next, [o]r it can take a big step toward
fundamental structural reform."

At the same time the Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) called on FERC
to issue an emergency cease and desist order prohibiting the Cal-ISO from
"unilaterally implementing" any changes to its current $250/MWh price cap for
wholesale electricity purchases. In a motion filed Monday, the marketer group
specifically asked the Commission to bar the Cal-ISO board of directors from
putting into effect its decision to impose a fiendishly complex
load-differentiated price cap of $100 or less during the off-peak season
effective Nov. 3. The plan was designed by the state's main utility consumer
group (see Daily GPI, Oct. 30). In addition, the EPSA urged FERC to "state
explicitly" that the Cal-ISO does not have the authority to impose or extend
price or bid caps, unless expressly authorized to do so by the Commission.
The Cal-ISO's current authority to set price caps expires on Nov. 15.

Lay said the Cal-ISO's complicated new formula caps prices below the cost of
gas-fired generation, "making obvious errors such as failing to take into
account gas transportation costs between the Henry Hub and power plants in
California; in doing so the bid cap makes it more economic for generators to
sell their gas supply, rather than use it to make electricity in California."
The new formula also forces the ISO into the market to buy power on an ad hoc
basis "to keep the lights on when the capped market fails to attract
sufficient supplies (which it inevitably will do)," Lay said. In addition,
the capped formula "invites generators to shut in production, export power
out of state and deploy their turbines in other states or countries."

He noted that the ISO's Chairman voted against the measure while all of the
state's utilities voted for it "presumably knowing full well that it simply
will not work."

California is "just the latest failure of partial or compromised open
access," said Lay. "It's time for the Commission to reject this approach.

"The power industry --- the nation's most essential industry --- is mired in
the transition from regulated monopoly to open access and customer choice.
Every step forward has been compromised out of concern for alienating one
vested interest or another. As a result, utilities are free to slow the
interconnection of new generation, withhold equal access to the transmission
system, favor their own sales over those of competitors, miscalculated
available transmission capacity, and exercise control over supposedly
'independent' system operators and reliability organizations.

Lay predicted that installing price caps for political expediency would
"plunge markets into greater uncertainty and discourage new supplies and
conservation methods..."

FERC has to complete the work that it started, said Lay. It has to ensure
that all parties have equal and fair access to transmission by "ending the
special priority for utility uses of the system. Second, FERC must require
transmission owners to separate operation of the monopoly transmission assets
from their other businesses. Third, FERC must take politics out of
transmission system operations by revising governance structures to ensure
independence. Finally, FERC must end its reliance on shortsighted price caps
by putting in place the necessary reforms to allow these markets to operate
efficiently to encourage conservation and attract new supplies."

EPSA said the Cal-ISO board "acted in obvious disregard for the Commission's
orderly processes." It "cannot be permitted to make the Commission's
decisions for it, or to alter so radically market rules, thereby injecting
more uncertainty and confusion in the market and subverting the process for
fashioning fair, effective and comprehensive remedies" for California's
"flawed" electric markets, the group noted.

The EPSA believes that any remedial actions taken by FERC with respect to the
California markets will be "severely compromised" if the Cal-ISO board's
imposition of new prices caps is allowed to take effect.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Ramona
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 10:44 AM
To:	Carson, Mike; 'ken.merideth@energykoch.com'
Cc:	Sewell, Doug
Subject:	Please see attached confirm

     /02    NON-CHECK FINANCIAL DATA FOR REF. #    30202545504
ACCOUNT: 40781075      ENRON CORP-ECT CASH SVC
            AMOUNT      POST DATE  VALUE DATE   CODE      BATCH/TRACK       DUP
        257,721.12       01/25/02    01/25/02    479     650000000571         1
TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION
SAME DAY DR TRANSFER
         GID:LCT20251018400
         FED20020125B1Q8023C002614
         USER REF:S053022000155878
         REF:      S053022000155878
         ORDER:    ENA CASH SERVICES
         CR BK ID: 021000021
         CR BK:    JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FORMERLY CHASE
          MANHATTAN BANK,N.A NEW YORK, NY 10004
         BENEF:    323009980 ENTERGY KOCH TRADING, LP
          20 E GREENWAY PLZ HOUSTON, TX US 77046
         DETAILS:WT0125 ENTERGY PREPAY FOR JAN PO
         WER S053022000155878
         INSTRUCT DATE:01/25/02 ADVICE TYPE:MAIL

ENTER  (1) YESTERDAY    (2) TODAY        (3) SEARCH       (4) SERIAL


Amy confirmed for me that USGT's scheduled volumes West on Ctrcc 27161 since 11/1/01 total 13,785.  She is not including the volumes for today (11/20), since it's not a final volume for the day yet.


You have been selected to interview Real Time candidate Justin Bates. Justin will be returning to the office for his second round of interviews and has indicated that early morning interviews will work best for his schedule.

With that in mind, I would like to set up the interviews to take place at 8:00am on Thursday, July 12th. Each session will be about 45 minutes in length (max), with the last interview ending at 11:00am.

If you are aware of any conflicts with this day/time, please let me know as soon as possible. I would like to have the schedule finalized by tomorrow morning.

If you have any questions, let me know!

Thanks,
Grace
x8321

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, July 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	2nd I/V - Justin

Grace -

Can you please have Justin come in for a 2nd interview.

He needs to meet with....

Chris Foster
Greg wolfe
Mike Driscoll
Kourtney Nelson

Thanks!
Amy


We have made the  following modifications to the EnronOnline applications.

Stack Manager Changes

Fill Order Enhancements - (Effective Tuesday September 25)
?	To fill a Top of Stack order in Stack Manager, Right click on the pink shaded order in the depth window of Stack Manager and select fill.
?	The trader now has the ability to fill limit orders that appear at the top of the trader's stack on both sides.
?	The order will now be filled at the full order volume regardless of the trader's stack volume.
?	Filling an order will not move the trader's price or cause a hedge to occur.

Resize floated stack windows- (Effective Tuesday September 25)

You will now have the ability to resize the stack window to the desired extent.

Website Changes ( Effective Monday September 24)

Limit Order Restrictions on Physical Transactions -
?	Customers will not be allowed to transact with themselves on physical transactions. If a top of stack limit order has been placed on a physical product the counterparty or desk that placed the order will not be allowed to transact on it.
?	If a customer or desk has top of stack limit orders at different prices on both the bid and offer and subsequently moves the price of one so that they are at the same price, both orders will be cancelled. The customer would have effectively transacted with himself.

Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks.

Savita ( X 31787)


Hi guys,

In looking at CRRA's comments to the draft LOI. I have these questions:

1.  I'm not sure what we mean by EPC contract.  Is this referring to the Fuel
Cell document we are working now, or is there to be another layer? I know
this may depend on whether CRRA or someone else is doing the balance of the
construction activities.

2.  He expects one EPC contract, and we had tried to leave room for multiple
contracts. Does anyone care?

3.  Does CRRA get a full refund of the purchase price if the fuel cells fail
the performance tests?  We have discussed with FCE the concept of a
proportional reduction if the performance is within 10 percent, then a full
reduction as to the failing unit(s) only.  Also, are we planning to mark up
the fuel cell contract to recover our fee?  Is our fee at risk for the fuel
cells failing to perform?

Thanks,

Kay


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 05:28 PM -----

	Tom Moran
	06/01/2000 05:25 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities,
Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 6/1/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 6/1/00.

Regards
tm


cautionary words - fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 01/21/2001 11:10 PM
---------------------------

"sarah yu" <sarahmyu@hotmail.com> on 01/19/2001 03:47:42 PM
To: sharonwongyu@yahoo.com, ckhvang@soes.com, tly@furnitureforbusiness.com,
DNMcAlexander@hotmail.com, jbnguyen@us.ibm.com, Tracy.Ngo@enron.com,
christina.son@halliburton.com, abbyg29@hotmail.com, sonjacki@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: Fw: Prison Interviews - Serious

>>Subject: Prison Interviews - Serious
>>
>>
>> > Please read all of this.  It could save you or someone you love.
>> >
>> > Interview of rapists and date rapists in prison on what they look for
>>and
>> > here's some interesting facts:
>> >
>> > >The #1 thing men look for in a potential victim is hairstyle. They are
>>most
>> > likely to go after a woman with a ponytail, bun, braid or other
>>hairstyle
>> > that can easily be grabbed. They are also likely to go after a woman
>>with
>> > long hair. Women with short hair are not common targets.
>> >
>> > The second thing men look for is clothing. They will look for women
>>who's
>> > clothing is easy to remove quickly. The #1 outfit they look for is
>>overalls
>> > because many of them carry scissors around to cut clothing and on
>>overalls
>> > the straps can be easily cut.
>> >
>> > They also look for women on their cell phone, searching through their
>>purse
>> > or doing other activities while walking because they are off guard and
>>can
>> > be easily overpowered.
>> >
>> > >The time of day men are most likely to attack and rape a woman is in
>>the
>> > early morning, between 5 and 8:30 a.m. The number one place women are
>> > abducted from/attacked at is grocery store parking lots. Number two is
>> > office parking lots/garages. Number three is public restrooms.
>> >
>> > The thing about these men is that they are looking to grab a woman and
>> > quickly move her to a second location where they don't have to worry
>>about
>> > getting caught. Only 2% said they carried weapons because rape carries
>>a
>>3-5
>> > year sentence but rape with a weapon is 15-20 years.
>> >
>> > If you put up any kind of a fight at all, they get discouraged because
>>it
>> > only takes a minute or two for them to realize that going after you
>>isn't
>> > worth it because it will be time-consuming.
>> >
>> > These men said they will not pick on women who have umbrellas, or other
>> > similar objects that can be used from a distance, in
>> > >their hands. Keys are not a deterrent because you have to get really
>>close
>> > to the attacker to use them as a weapon. So, the idea
>> > is to convince these guys you're not worth it. Several defense
>>mechanisms
>>he
>> > taught us are:
>> >
>> > >* If someone is following behind you on a street or in a garage or
>>with
>>you
>> > in an elevator or stairwell, look them in the face and ask them a
>>question,
>> > like what time is it, or make general small talk, I can't believe  it
>>is
>>so
>> > cold out here, we're in for a bad winter. Now you've seen their face
>>and
>> > could identify them in a lineup, you lose appeal as a target.
>> >
>> > >* If someone is coming toward you, hold out your hands in front of you
>>and
>> > yell Stop or Stay back! Most of the rapists this man
>> > talked to said they'd leave a woman alone if she yelled or showed that
>>she
>> > would not be afraid to fight back. Again, they are looking for an EASY
>> > target.
>> >
>> > If you carry pepper spray (this instructor was a huge advocate of it
>>and
>> > carries it with him wherever he goes,) yelling I HAVE PEPPER SPRAY and
>> > holding it out will be a deterrent.
>> >
>> > >* If someone grabs you, you can't beat them with strength but you can
>>by
>> > outsmarting them. If they grab your wrist, pull your
>> > wrist back so your hand is in waving position (palm facing forward) and
>> > twist it toward yourself and pull your arm away. It is hard to hold
>>onto
>> > wrist bones that are moving in that way. They stumble toward you and
>>you
>> > stumble back, so you can use that momentum to bring the same out and
>> > backhand them with your knuckles in the forehead, nose or teeth.
>> >
>> > >* If you are grabbed around the waist from behind, pinch the attacker
>> > either under the arm between the elbow and armpit or
>> > in the upper inner thigh HARD. One woman in a class this guy taught
>>told
>>him
>> > she used the underarm pinch on a guy who was trying to date rape her
>>and
>>was
>> > so upset she broke through the skin and tore out muscle strands - the
>>guy
>> > needed stitches.  Try pinching yourself in those places as hard as you
>>can
>> > stand it; it hurts.
>> >
>> > >* After the initial hit, always go for the groin. I know from a
>> > particularly unfortunate experience that if you slap a guy's balls
>> > (sorry to be graphic)it is extremely painful. You might think that
>>you'll
>> > piss the guy off and make him want to hurt you more, but
>> > the thing these rapists told our instructor is that they want a woman
>>who
>> > will not cause a lot of trouble. Start causing trouble, and he's out of
>> > there.
>> >
>> > >* When the guy puts his hands up to you, grab his first two fingers
>>and
>> > bend them back as far as possible with as much pressure pushing down on
>>them
>> > as possible. The instructor did it to me without using much pressure,
>>and
>> > ended up on my knees and both knuckles cracked audibly.
>> >
>> > >Of course the things we always hear still apply.  Always be aware of
>>your
>> > surroundings, take someone with you if you can and if
>> > you see any odd behavior, don't dismiss it, go with your instincts. You
>>may
>> > feel a little silly at the time, but you'd feel much worse if the guy
>>really
>> > was trouble.
>> >
>> > >Please forward this to any woman you know, it's simple stuff that
>>could
>> > save her life.
>> >
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Well, aren't you hangin' with the big dogs.

No big deal.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/16/2001 02:27 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: term sheet & mou

I'm at my desk, but have a 2:30 with Duran and a 3:30 with Lavo. I can send
someone up to get the docs if you like.

Kay Mann@ENRON
05/16/2001 01:53 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: term sheet & mou

Are you here?  I wanted to get those Intergen consents done and out of the
way.  Also, DDuran needs to sign the Northwestern guaranty (Oz signed but
they want more copies), and I thought it would be best if you initialled.

ckm


I will be out of the office Friday, Oct. 12th.  I will return on the 15th.


Attached is a letter re the above referenced.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Book Officialization Process in Risktrak  Meeting - Conf. Rm. ???

Date:		12/6/2000
Time:		2:00 PM - 2:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dear Pilot Participant,

The ClickAtHome Team has received an invoice for the Enron subsidized portion
of your ClickAtHome Computer.  This email is to verify that you have received
your Dell PC successfully.  If so, you can disregard this message and enjoy
your computer.

If you have not received your PC, or you returned it and have chosen to not
participate in the ClickAtHome program, PLEASE reply to this email or email
the ClickAtHome Team at clickathome@enron.com to notify us of this billing
error.

Thank you,
ClickAtHome Team!


probablyl gonna just kick it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i haven't thought about it yet.  what are you doing

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:30 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

you know, whatever.  i will let you know later.  what are you doing
tonight.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:57 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   like what?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:51 AM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i can think of a few things

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
   NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      i was just kidding.  i am very sweet.  i feel terrible that you
   didn't
      sleep
      well. if there was anything i could do to make you feel better i
   would.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      real sweet.  you have a stone heart.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
      NRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:38 AM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         of course you don't.  you just dream up these things so i will
   feel
         sorry
         for you, i don't.  you slept fine.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:10 AM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         um, i don't remember that.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
         NRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:00 AM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            that's your fault.  you were taking up over half of the bed, i
   had
      to
            ask
            you to move over.  and then you kept coughing in the middle of
   the
         night
            and
            waking me up. so, i did not sleep well. you probably slept
   better
         than
            me, i
            don't know what you're complaining about.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:53 AM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            i am tired b/c i kept waking up with no covers and my butt was
         hanging
            off
            the bed. i looked at you and you were covered up to your neck
   with
         the
            covers in the middle of the bed.  you look like you slept well.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
            NRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 8:45 AM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               i know, me too.  but isn't she so cute?  i love her, she's
   the
         best.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
               Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:12 AM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject:

               i am tired.  your dog kept me up all night.

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and
               may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use
         of
            the
               intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
         disclosure
            by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply
               to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
               all
               copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
         are
            not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Per my note below, please fax the agreement to me at the fax number below, and I will have it executed by an officer at Enron and return it to you via fax.  If you would prefer to have originals executed, please send two executed originals to me, Tana Jones at 1400 Smith Street, 38th Floor, Houston, Texas 77002.  I look forward to receiving the document.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	JGeraci@ecredit.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-JGeraci+40ecredit+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Jones, Tana; JGeraci@ecredit.com
Cc:	Perinne, Albane; Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	RE: NDA - eCredit.com, Inc.

Tana,

We have executed and agreed to the NDA.  Could you please let me know where
and who to send it to?

THanks
John

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
To: jgeraci@ecredit.com
Cc: Perinne, Albane; Koehler, Anne C.
Sent: 9/20/2001 3:05 PM
Subject: NDA - eCredit.com, Inc.

At the request of Albane Perinne, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the enclosed meets with your approval,
please execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713)
646-3490.  I will then have it executed by Enron.  If you have any
comments or questions please call Anne Koehler, Senior Counsel, at (713)
853-3448 or me at (713) 853-3399.  We look forward to hearing from you.

 <<ecredit.com.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
 <<ecredit.com.doc>>


I have arranged for the meeting to take place in the large conference room here on the sixth floor - 06980.  I have confirmed that the A/V equipment is working so if you would like to use powerpoint in the conference room, it is available.  Also, if you would like to send me your presentations I will be more than happy to test run them for you or have them ready to go.  I will be here at 7:00 - 7:30 am tomorrow morning.

Sandwiches have been ordered for lunch and will be served in conference room 06984.

k

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Webb, Jay; MEYERS, Thomas; Hillier, Bob; McAuliffe, Bob; Rub, Jenny; Hall Jr., Robert L.; Donovan, Bill; Brackett, Debbie R.; Oxley, David; Bradford, William S.; Schultea, Kathryn
Cc:	Golden, Jeff; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Integration Meeting

We will have a networked pc in the room - so choose if you want handouts or a powerpoint.

Kim will forward details of the room today.

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Webb, Jay; MEYERS, Thomas; Hillier, Bob; McAuliffe, Bob; Rub, Jenny; Hall Jr., Robert L.; Donovan, Bill; Brackett, Debbie R.; Oxley, David; Bradford, William S.
Cc:	Muller, Mark S.; Golden, Jeff; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Integration Meeting

The meeting has been confirmed.

They told me that they want to essentially gain an understanding of what our plan is to get up and running as quickly as possible which does I think differ slightly from integration.

Have I missed any critical group?

9 am 		Introduction
9:15 am		Infrastructure 						Rub
9:45am		IT - Development & Ops				Webb
10:15 am 		Mid Office Start-up Overview				Hall
10:45		Credit Start-up Overview				Brackett
11:15 noon		Accounting, cash etc Integration Overview		Colwell/Georges/Meyers

11am 		Tour of the building/infrastructure			Donovan

Thanks

Louise
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Colwell, Wes; Hodges, Georgeanne; Webb, Jay; MEYERS, Thomas; Hillier, Bob; McAuliffe, Bob; Rub, Jenny; Hall Jr., Robert L.; Donovan, Bill
Cc:	Muller, Mark S.; Golden, Jeff; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly
Subject:	Integration Meeting

One of our potential buyers will be here at 9am on Thursday.  The scope of the meeting is to run through the integration schedule.  This is a very broad agenda and will probably be very interactive.	 I tried to put Ops first but it really doesn't make sense.

This really is a really rough agenda for you guys to decide upon but I wanted to set out the areas they wish to cover.

9 am 		Introduction
9:15 am		Infrastructure						Rub
10 am		IT - Development & Ops				Webb
11 am 		Mid Office Intergation Overview			Hall
12 noon		Accounting, cash etc Integration Overview		Colwell/Georges/Meyers

11am 		Tour of the building/infrastructure			Donovan

Wes - they want to cover bank accounts and cash in detail.

Some time during the morning they want a tour of the facilities - I am arranging with Bill Donovan.

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


he is going to get hurt.  your forgot that the saints are cursed.


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.


It looks like Mark has been working on this from out of the office.  Maybe
you don't have to do anything!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:14 AM -----

	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	04/09/2001 07:49 PM

		 To: richard.dix@gm.com
		 cc: John.Allario@enron.com, Kay.Young@enron.com, kenneth.wong@gm.com,
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement

Richard -

Thanks so much for providing the below document.  While I appreciate its
simplicity, it does not fully satisfy Enron's requirements.  If it is not too
much trouble, could you or Kenneth please provide comments to the agreement
provided.

I will be back in my office on Wednesday and can address matters directly
with Kenneth or you at that time.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	richard.dix@gm.com
	04/07/2001 07:24 AM

		 To: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
		 cc: John.Allario@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com, Kay.Young@enron.com,
kenneth.wong@gm.com
		 Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement

We would propose the following document for proprietary information.  If you
have any comments, please contact
Ken Wong at Kenneth.Wong@gm.com or 313 974-1348. I will only be available by
email until Thursday morning.

Thanks
Richard Dix

(See attached file: Proprietary Info-enron.doc)

 - Proprietary Info-enron.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kyle Etter                           10/23/2000 04:46 PM

To: Christopher Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan
Mathews/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff Coates/HOU/EES@EES,
Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Simpson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Erin A Rice/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott L
PALMER/ENRON@enronxgate, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Email

Here is my email address.  Email me if any of you will be in San Antonio.

kyle_etter@hotmail.com

Kyle


Linda, a significant opportunity exists for Enron to help elevate the
importance of Japanese energy sector reform ahead of the US/ Japan summit on
30 June. Energy sector reform is crucial to Japan,s economic recovery and to
Enron,s value proposition in Japan.

Currently:
Despite some reforms, competition is virtually nonexistent in Japan,s energy
sector.
Japan,s economic recovery is being hampered by lack of energy sector reform.
Positive political momentum is developing in Japan for macro-economic reform.
The US Government is currently focused on energy issues and Japan,s economy.
The US and Japan will be finalizing the current round of bilateral
discussions on energy deregulation in the next three weeks ahead of the 30
June summit.

While we maintain a regular dialogue with the US embassy in Japan and with
the USTR, and have significant input on both the US and Japanese sides in the
bilateral discussions on energy deregulation, I believe that we need to raise
the issue to more senior levels within the US Government. I propose that in
the next three weeks we meet with levels equivalent to Amb. Zoellick, Mr
Lindsay and Assistant Secretary Armitage, though of course I would be guided
by you on that front.

I attach a brief note which sets out the proposal in more detail.

If you are available perhaps we can discuss the proposal briefly this
afternoon (Thursday). Given the time difference, after 6pm would be
preferable. Alternatively Friday morning, Washington time, would be ok.

I look forward to hearing from you.

kind regards


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Dyer/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle
Gross/HOU/EES@EES, Wayne Kimball/HOU/EES@EES, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff McClellan/HOU/EES@EES,
gbill@contechnet.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Picture of New Air Force One


Bryan,

Are you still having a great time?  So what is Bali like?  The only images I
can summon are Gauguin's paintings, but weren't those of Tahiti?

Things are pretty good here.  Lots of Christmas parties, lots of Christmas
cheer, etc.  Not a whole lot going on at the office, for a change.  Really,
though, I think I would much rather be in Bali.

Take care.

S.


Houston Ballet gives free performances of Copp,lia
at Miller Outdoor Theatre in Hermann Park
8:00 p.m. Friday May 11, Saturday May 12, & Sunday May 13, 2001
sponsored by AZURIX and ENRON

Considered the great comedy of classical ballet, Copp,lia  tells the story of
a doll so enchantingly lifelike that she mesmerizes an entire village,
captures the heart of a young swain named Franz and inspires the eccentric
toymaker Dr. Copp,lius to attempt to transform her into a living, breathing
human being.

AZURIX and ENRON are Corporate Sponsors for Houston Ballet's Miller Theatre
performances, helping to present these free performances of Copp,lia to the
people of Houston.  Houston Ballet has a limited number of tickets for the
seated area each night for employees of AZURIX and ENRON.  These tickets are
available on a first-come, first-served basis by calling William at
713-535-3235 no later than 5 PM today .  (Please be aware that all unoccupied
seats are released at 10 minutes before curtain.)

Other, free, general public tickets for the seated area (max 4 per person)
are available at the Miller Theatre 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. on the day of
performance; for more information call 713-284-8351 for the Miller Theatre
ticket information line.  Tickets are not required for the lawn area.

About Coppelia
Copp,lia was first performed on May 25, 1870 at the Th,atre Imp,rial de
L'Op,ra, featuring choreography by Arthur Saint-L,on and music by L,o
Delibes. The work maintains a special place in the history of dance, serving
as a kind of bridge from the glory of the French Romantic ballet in the early
nineteenth century to the masterpieces of the Russian Imperial Theater at the
turn of the century. Writing in The International Dictionary of Ballet,
critic Karen Dacko analyzes the unique characteristics of the piece as
follows: "Copp,lia owes its longevity to its inspired, very danceable score.
But the ballet is also remarkable for its perennial appeal and for its
historical significance as Romanticism's grand finale and classical ballet's
prologue."
Copp,lia first entered Houston Ballet' repertoire in October 1974, in a
staging by Frederic Franklin (who also performed the role of Dr. Copp,lius),
and featuring scenery by Peter Farmer. In November 1979, former Royal Ballet
ballerina Anne Heaton re-staged the work for the company. When Houston Ballet
premiered its new production of the work in March 1992 featuring breathtaking
d,cor by Desmond Heeley, Carl Cunningham of The Houston Post wrote, "It would
be hard to imagine anything to cap the joyous, gentle, and glorious looking
new production of Copp,lia the splendidly prepared company of dancers and
musicians put forth Thursday evening on Wortham Center's Brown Theater
stage."    (The Houston Post, March 21, 1992)
Heeley's designs for Copp,lia never fail to enchant, most notably in the
second-act depiction of Dr. Copp,lius's workshop. The sampling of dolls on
display pay homage to the era when automatons, or mechanical toys, were the
rage in Europe -- and to Heeley's inexhaustible creativity. Among the
eye-popping toys featured in  the workshop are a huge astrologer with a
pointed hat and a robe covered in shooting stars and moons; a strongman with
a handlebar mustache and barbells; Puss n Boots; an acrobat hanging from a
trapeze holding the man in the moon; and a small ballerina dancing on the
back of a goat. In the first act, the vibrant reds, golds, and oranges of the
costumes worn by the peasants in the village conjure up a wonderfully
picturesque vision of nineteenth century Bavaria.


Sara,

The desk has transacted two five year swaptions.  Do you recall where we were
on the ISDA?  Negotiations had cooled significantly in light of the
structured Skeena deal dying; however, now may be a good tome to resurrect.
I have made the ISDA a condition precedent to exercise of the swaption.  I
seem to recall the open issue was the definitions for the financial covenants
of the MAC clause (cross border lease, etc.). I seem to recall that they
didn't provide us with some of the definitions within the definitions.  I
will pull my file to see if I can determine where we are.  Please let me know
what your file indicates.

Thanks.


I was going to suggest that we inbed some wiggle in the specifications, but
no big deal.

Kay


Bob talked with TFS this morning and has the deals in his trade log now. I'll
get the deal numbers from him as soon as he inputs them, but you should see
those trades in the system soon.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/01/2000 08:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

can you check with bob again, because i got confirms on the deals.  the
broker told me yesterday he forgot to tell bob.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs checkout

missing 2 deals for bob:

buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak

thanks


Tana -
This e-mail includes the attachment.  It "fell off" my e-mail from last night.

Thanks -
Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cass, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, April  24, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Moorer, Torrey; Denny, Jennifer; Thomas, Sheri
Subject: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions

Hi Tana -

We need your assistance in preparing termination letters for the transactions
listed on the attached spreadsheet and described as follows:

On Friday, April 20, 2001, four transactions occurred on EnronOnline that
were in error.  One transaction was with Coral Energy Holding L.P. and three
transactions were with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.  As mutually agreed
to by both the Enron commercial team and the respective counterparties, it
was decided that each of the four transactions would not be confirmed and
should be terminated.

The exact specifics are detailed as follows:

? The transactions occurred due to an inadvertent entry in the actual
production system of EnronOnline by a Product Control Group member, Melba
Lozano.  Melba activated a product assuming that she was in the EnronOnline
test system of EnronOnline.

? The product transacted upon is normally managed by Frank Ermis.  However,
in his absence on Friday, the product was managed by Matt Lenhart.

? Steve South, trader on the West Desk, called and notified both Morgan and
Coral that the product had been posted in error.  All parties agreed that the
transactions were not reflective of the normal pricing.  As a result they
further agreed that transaction confirmations would not be necessary and that
the deals would be "killed" on all sides.  (For reference of any telephone
tapes that may need to be pulled, the conversations with the counterparties
occurred around 2:00 pm.)

? No confirmations were generated as a result of the killing of the
transactions in TAGG.

? I spoke with Mike Grigsby on Monday (April 23, 2001) and advised him that
termination letters may be required by Legal.  He responded that he had no
problem with that.

Tana, please advise if additional information is required to complete the
termination letters or if another course of action is warranted.

Thank you,

Rob Cass
x35491


your meat is ready


Mark:
Here is the latest draft of docs for the physical deal.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 01:18 PM -----

	"Robert Stephens" <rstephens@bracepatt.com>
	01/26/2001 07:07 PM

		 To: <annscully@aol.com>, <lmstoler@aol.com>, <chrishelfrich@cs.com>,
<carol.st.clair@enron.com>, <chris.helfrich@enron.com>,
<lou.stoler@enron.com>, <rodney.malcom@enron.com>,
<craig.hiddleston@houston.rr.com>, <craighiddleston@houston.rr.com>,
<cdoveala@metalsusa.com>, <jhageman@metalsusa.com>,
<nhsorensen@porterhedges.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Metals/Enron Documents

Attached are drafts of the following documents for tomorrow's meetings:

1.  Checklist
2.  Purchase Agreement
3.  Definitions
4.  Supply Agreement
5.  Intercreditor Agreement

 - PurchAgmtRed.doc
 - #1245753 vRED - DEFINITIONS EXHIBIT A.doc
 - #1246811 v1 - DOCUMENT CHECKLIST - METALS.doc
 - intercreditor126.doc
 - #1195357 vRED - PRODUCT SUPPLY AGREEMENT-METALS.doc


Mom's birthday is tommorow. What are we going to get her?

Chris


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                     Tuesday, December 5, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

                         Close    Change  %Change

            FOOL 50    1,802.27   +80.80   +4.69%
            DJIA      10,898.72  +338.62   +3.21%
            S&P 500    1,376.54   +51.57   +3.89%
            NASDAQ     2,889.80  +274.05  +10.48%
           (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 Sponsored by: Ameritrade
 You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
 tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
 account with just $500. Click below for Ameritrade.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=229521

NEWS: WHAT THE NEXT MICROSOFT WILL LOOK LIKE
  The Motley Fool examines what it takes to become the next
  software superpower.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229522

RULE BREAKER: STARBUCKS' BRAND POWER
  Brian Lund illustrates how a company's brand can be the moat
  around its business.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229523

FOOL ON THE HILL: TO SELL OR NOT TO SELL
  What's your reasoning behind getting rid of -- or keeping -- a
  stock that's down this year?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229524

NEWS: GREENSPAN SPEAKS, STOCKS ROCKET
  The Federal Reserve Chair says recession, not inflation, is now
  the bigger threat.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229525

SPECIAL: INDUSTRY FOCUS FLASHBACK
  Bill Mann rates last year's performance and tells why it's not
  worth bragging about.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229526

FOOLISH 8: SMALL CAP TRY-OUTS
  Brian Graney tells how small companies make the Foolish 8 team.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229527

TOP NEWS STORIES
  See the latest on Nokia, Cree, Yahoo!, and 3Com
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229528

RULE MAKER: ASSESSING PFIZER'S PIPELINE
  In order to know a drug maker's future, you've got to know how
  good its pipeline is. Here's one evaluation technique.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229529

ELECTION FOLLY 2000: THE WINNERS
  America may not have its president, but Election Folly now has
  a winner.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229530

DRIP PORT: CIENA'S COLORFUL LIFE
  The fiber optic tour continues with a visit to Ciena and a look
  into its brief history and its competition.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229531

FOOLISH FOUR: STUDENT LOAN BLUES
  If you want to get the student loan monkey off your back, you
  have two options.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229532

FOOL'S DEN: THE SIZZLING STORAGE INDUSTRY
  Despite the volatility of the stock market, some aspects of IT
  are growing fast.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229533

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: YAHOO! ACTS GLOBAL, REACTS LOCAL
  What are the implications for global companies when local laws
  intervene?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229534

WORKSHOP: CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS
  Todd Beaird explains what correlation coefficients are and why
  they are important to any Workshop portfolio.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229535

FRIBBLE: WHY LUCK DOESN'T PAY
  Is the lottery your idea of a good investment? Read why Brian
  DeBlanc says "Luck ain't a lady."
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229536

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: 3COM DISAPPOINTS
  Can a cash-rich balance sheet offset a slowdown in orders?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229537

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229538
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229539
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229540
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229541
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229542

 Sponsored by: Ameritrade
 You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
 tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
 account with just $500. Click below for Ameritrade.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=229543

17 STOCK IDEAS, ONE REPORT
 Don't miss our best-selling research product, Industry
 Focus 2001. Available in electronic download or hard copy.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=229544

ATTENTION, BIOTECH INVESTORS: NEW INVESTING GUIDE
      Learn to analyze the potential of biotech companies
      with our new biotech investing guide.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=229545

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=229546

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-14220-2000-12-05_18-10-53-6545389_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-18:35:10(12-0
5-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Attached is the past due process as approved by The Office of the Chair. We will begin implementing the process effective immediately. Additionally, we will be rolling out a separate process for dispute resolution and for the termination procedures by Service Management. If you have any questions or comments, please call me or Joni Fisher.

Mike Krautz
Sr. Director
Accounts Receivable


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001
10:56 AM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 05/04/2001 10:51:44 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - April American Express

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Cindy K. Olson
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: April American Express
Report Total: $8,324.36
Amount Due Employee: $8,324.36

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Life is busy at Enron and I literally receive hundreds of e:mails every
week.  This is not the best way to communicate with me on priority issues.  I
have looked at your proposal and would be interested in learning more.  Can
you provide more details beyond your presentation?  What is your background
and experience?  Can you provide information on your company?

ConfirmCorp@aol.com on 08/01/2000 09:16:40 AM
To: Sally.Beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Proposal for Electronic Confirmations

Sally:

Since I have not heard back from you is it safe to assume that you are not
interested learning more about how Enron can automate its confirmation
process?  If this is the case, would it be okay if I approached someone else
in your organization about the idea?

Thanks for your consideration.

Chris Papousek


Start Date: 10/9/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100911.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: PNM_EPMI_CISO
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: SRP_EPMI_CISO
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/9/01
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: MPC_EPMI_CISO
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I just talked to Tino Monaldo, Dennis Langley's lawyer/project manager for
the Pueblo project.  I explained Bill and Bill's credentials and concerns and
Tino suggested that a sit down between Enron and their government contracts
team might be helpful.  He offered to do it in Houston, probably late next
week or the following week.  Attending would be Dennis, Tino, and their
outside lawyers, Jim Slattery and Rick Harrington.  Harrington is the key--he
is a retired military guy and one of the lead govt. contracts lawyers at my
old firm in DC.  The would basically put on a dog and pony walking us all
through their sole source strategy,  including their legal interpretations
and the allies they have lined up within DOE/DOD.  Bill and Bill--does such a
meeting sound productive?  If so, should we have outside govt. contracts
counsel present and if so, who do you suggest?

On a related note, Tino explained (without me asking or really caring) that
he was in the middle of a "big drafting project"--revising Dennis' joint
venture agreement with the Isleta.  I took the opportunity to express my
concern at how far down the road Dennis is getting on the overall deal,
including structure issues, without knowing whether Enron is even on board.
I reminded Tino that GPG has not committed to participating in the pipeline
or the power plant, and that we have not obtained ENA's agreement to commit
turbines.   Apparently Dennis believes that if the economics pans out, Enron
or someone else yet to be identified will magically jump in to the deal with
money, turbines, etc.   If Enron does eventually decide to get into this
deal, the agreements and promises that Dennis has already made may need to be
revisited.   Thanks for your patience on this project.  DF