Thanks!.  I'll fax it back to you after it's signed.

	"Pete Groetzinger" <pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com>
	07/13/2000 07:08 PM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc: "David Salomon" <dsalomon@lab9.com>, <John.Pavetto@enron.com>,
<Louise.Kitchen@enron.com>
		 Subject: RE: BrentBroker Full Style

Tana - I just sent the executed CA to your fax machine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:00 PM
To: pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com
Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; John.Pavetto@enron.com
Subject: Re: BrentBroker Full Style

Please find attached a copy of our proposed form of Confidentiality
Agreement.  Please call me if you have any comments or questions.  If the
agreement meets with your approval, please have an authorizied officer of
the company execute it and return the signed document to me at the fax
number below.  Thanks for your attention herewith.

I passed on your "regards" to Robbi Rossi.

(See attached file: brentbroker.doc)

Tana Jones
Paralegal
Ph:  (713) 853-3399
Fax:  (713) 646-3490

                    "Pete Groetzinger"
                    <pgroetzinger@brentb        To:
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    roker.com>                  cc:
                                                Subject:     BrentBroker
Full Style
                    07/12/2000 05:01 PM

Tana -

The legal name is: Brent Broker.com LLC

I look forward to receiving your Confidentiality Agreement.

Regards,

Peter V. Groetzinger, COO
BrentBroker.com
One Riverway, Suite 2500
Houston, Texas 77056
USA
713.888.0500
www.brentbroker.com


We have a great deal of work underway with our continuing operations, bankruptcy related issues, managing asset sales transitions and major operating environment issues.  While I have great confidence in our ability to overcome challenges, we will need to simultaneously direct our attention on a number of key areas to be successful.

In light of the above, I have asked Danny McCarty to take on a new role as managing director of special projects for Enron Global Services (EGS).  Danny's responsibilities will include a number of complex bankruptcy related activities, the workout of certain troubled assets and optimizing the value of selected businesses.

Until the question of our right to repurchase Northern Natural Gas is resolved, it is better to minimize organizational changes.  Consequently, I do not plan to replace Danny as managing director and chief commercial officer of Enron Transportation Services (ETS) at this time.  Steve Harris, Bob Hayes, Rob Kilmer, Shelley Corman and the business development efforts will report directly to me.

I truly appreciate Danny's willingness to take on this responsibility.  His involvement should ensure that we dedicate the necessary attention to key business issues, while allowing Jim Hughes and me to focus on the priorities of a reorganization plan and our day-to-day operations.

As always, thank you for your continued dedication and support.

Stan


yeah i will be there

who all is going to sierra and what time?

Bryan Hull
04/04/2001 12:55 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

are you going to be at the game tonight?

there are a few people going to Sierra if you and Shana are interested


If we worked out a price structure similar to the last cargo, we could
eliminate the price risk by paying the following for the LPG:

1400 MT at a Fixed Price (represents amount borrowed that went to April sales)
2900 MT based on May Mont Belvieu plus Premium 1
2800 MT based on June Mont Belvieu plus Premium 2 and
2900 MT based on July Mont Belvieu plus Premium 3

The Fixed Price for 1400 MT and the Premiums 1,2, and 3 are under discussion
with Suzanne. This structure matches the cost of product with ProCaribe's
sales revenue.

Question: How does ProCaribe get paid for the 15 days of product that goes
with the Progasco sale?

Paul

Greg Curran
05/04/2001 02:45 PM
Sent by: Greg Curran
To: Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg
Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico
Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mariella
Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Next Cargo

Please explain how we will manage the price risk on this.  Remeber that we
have to give 15 days worth of product with the sale of  Progas.  What are the
payment terms?  How are you with cash?

Miguel Maltes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/04/2001 02:12 PM
To: Javier Chavarria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico
Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Next Cargo

Our next cargo has a loading window in PDVSA on May 18, 2001, with an ETA in
ProCaribe on May 19 - 21, 2001.  The cargo is for 10,000 Mts. (5.2MM gallons)
at MB + 7 three days around bill of lading.  This means that the invoice will
be the average price of MB on the loading day, the day before and the day
after, excluding weekends and holidays, plus 7 cents a gallon.

The following are the monthly sales average per customer:

* Progasco  1,100,000 gallons
* San Juan Gas     210,000 gallons
* Centro Gas                  140,000 gallons

Total borrowing return to EcoEl,ctrica 3,200 Mts or 1,667,200 gallons on
5/19/01.

After returning all the borrowing (5/19/01) we have a balance of 3,480,233
gallons.  The following are the estimated sales and heater consumption per
month:

* May (12 days)    563,520 gallons (from May 20th through May 31st)
* June (30 days)  1,408,800 gallons
* July  (31 days)  1,455,760 gallons

Inventory balance as of: 7/31/01 (52,153 gallons).

Next cargo arrival delivery window July 20 - 31, 2001.

Saludos


That will be great.

Thanks


As requested, attached is a list of ENW employees currently located in Enron Center South.

ENW employees located in Enron Center North that need to relocate to Enron Center South are not included.

Please let me know if you need anything further.

Tina Spiller
713.853.5746 Office
713.859.0521 Cell

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sustaita, Dolores
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:36 AM
To:	Spiller, Tina; Schoppe, Tammie; Shepperd, Tammy R.
Cc:	Duree, Janelle; Bubenko, Deborah
Subject:	Consolidation

Please provide me a list of the peoples names, locations and office unit names that are existing at Enron Center South.  This information is needed as soon as possible as meetings are being held today regarding consolidating 3 & 4.

Ana Alcantara has send the information for EIM.

Thank You,

Dolores Sustaita
Customer Service Representative
Office Services
x37977
(281)831-6815 Cell
ECN 0421a


No, only executed amendments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crawford, Sharon
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE: Hess relationship

If the amendments are not executed, do you still want them?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Crawford, Sharon; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Perlingiere, Debra; Heard, Marie
Cc:	Keohane, Peter
Subject:	FW: Hess relationship

Here's set of any master agreements I need ASAP.

I didn't mention it on the earlier ones, but for all of these, if any of the agreements have been amended, I will need any amendments, as well as any guarantees.  Much thanks!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	Hess relationship

Tana -

We need to pull together all of the contracts with the following:

	Amerada Hess Corporation
	Hess Energy Services Company, LLC
	Hess Energy Trading Company (UK) Limited
	Hess Energy Trading Company LLC

We need to pull together a Master Netting agreement with them ASAP.  Please call me (53923) with any questions.

Thanks,

JRW


Ehud,

I shall be glad to serve on the re-defined panel.
There may be some things I will be unable to comment
upon due to on-going investigations.

I should finalize my Austin trip plans in a day or so.
I will let you know.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ehud Ronn <eronn@mail.utexas.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:49 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Spring 2002 University of Texas Energy Finance Conference  Panel Discussion

Vince,

Greetings.

1.  Per our communications earlier this year, you had agreed to participate
in a Feb. 22 panel discussion entitled "Future of Energy Trading."

We have now revised the format of the above Conference, so that our current
planning is this:  On 2/22, from 2 - 5 p.m., at the McCombs School of
Business, we will have a panel discussion that will focus on
"Enron/Andersen:  Causes, Consequences and Conclusions."  We will invite
faculty, Energy Finance Group students, other students, other
practitioners, and possibly members of the press.

I write to inquire whether your earlier receptiveness to participating in a
panel discussion extends to this newly-defined topic.

2.  Alternatively, you had mentioned the possibility of coming to Austin in
early-to-mid Feb. to discuss matters with a smaller group.  I also seek to
discuss that matter with you.

I would like to call you this afternoon to discuss these two issues.  Best,
Ehud


Nicole - Please find attached: (a) a revised version of the Guarantee
containing our proposed changes; and (b) a note indicating what changes have
been made to the original form of guarantee that was forwarded to us with
Mirant's letter of February 22, 2001.  I will be talking to Derek Halvorsen
at BP this afternoon to confirm the provisions of Section 8 with him.  I
would appreciate it if you would review the events delineated in the preamble
of the guarantee to confirm that they are correct and provide me with any
comments you may have by return email.


Pls get on cips rims or whatever the hell it is and get Kern's max tariff rate for FT.  I'm getting convinced that the Kern neg. rate deal will feature prominantly in our defense.  DF


how was the concert?


STEVE KEAN

	Billy Dorsey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/28/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Jeremy Blachman@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown@ECT, Harold G Buchanan@EES, Rick
Buy@ECT, Richard Causey@ENRON, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Cox@Enron Communications,
David W Delainey@EES, James V Derrick@ENRON, Steve Elliott@ENRON
COMMUNICATIONS, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Ben
Glisan@ECT, Kevin Hannon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Rod Hayslett@ENRON, Stanley
Horton@ENRON, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen@ECT, Mark Koenig@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dan Leff@EES, Danny McCarty@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Mark Metts/NA/Enron, Mark S Muller@EES, Cindy
Olson@ENRON, Lou L Pai@EES, Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Matthew
Scrimshaw@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON, John
Sherriff@ECT, Jeff Skilling@ENRON, Marty Sunde@EES, Greg Whalley@ECT, Thomas
E White@EES, G G Garcia@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT, Karen K Heathman@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook@ENRON, Kay Chapman@EES, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron,
Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Inez C Dauterive@ECT, Carol Ann
Brown@ECT, Cindy Stark@ENRON, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie
Williamson@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand@ENRON, Tori L
Wells@ECT, Cathy Phillips@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron, Karen S Owens@EES, Dorothy Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
Mercedes E Estrada@Enron Communications, Christina Grow@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Taylor@ENRON, Judy G
Smith@EES, Kathy McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Suzanne Danz@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT, Jennifer Burns@ECT, Sharon W Dick@ECT, Beverly Aden@EES,
Kathy Dodgen@EES, Kerry Ferrari@ECT, Carol Moffett@EES, Jennifer Adams@Enron
Communications, Leah Rijo@ECT, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kathy Campos@ENRON, Julie Armstrong@Enron, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly Johnson@Enron, Rebecca
Carter@ENRON
		 cc: Vanessa Groscrand@ENRON
		 Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING-- March 5th.

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, March 5th
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person ____X___

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
March 2nd.

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


Kern River's throughput to CA was only 59%?  Did they have an outage?  Is the
remaining gas dropping-off before CA?  We usually assume in our gas flows
analysis that Kern is 100% full.  This seems unusual.

Christine Stokes
09/15/2000 08:46 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Transwestern Weekly Report

For the week September 11-15th:

Transwestern weekly average deliveries to California were 1,058 MMcf/d (97%)
while east deliveries averaged 339 MMcf/d.  San Juan lateral throughput
averaged 845 MMcf/d while receipts from Rio Puerco averaged 70 MMcf/d.
Mojave deliveries averaged 50 MMcf/d throughout the week.

El Paso average deliveries to California were 2,218 MMcf/d (76%) :

- PG&ETop (capacity 1,140 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 549 MMcf/d (48%)
- SoCalEhr (capacity 1,230 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 1,144 MMcf/d (93%)
- SoCalTop (capacity 541 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 524 MMcf/d (97%)

Other pipeline throughput:

- PGT ( capacity 1,937 MMcf/d) throughput to California averaged 1,908 MMc/d
(99%)
-  Kern River (capacity 700) throughput to California averaged 410 MMcf/d
(59%)

Thursday Enron Online Basis numbers:

Friday Perm-CA basis quotes were wider by about .07 for October from last
week, but the  Nov-March and April-Oct basis lost .07 and .04 respectively.
SJ-CA October basis lost .13 from last week while the Nov-March and April-Oct
basis both lost .06.

  Oct.  Nov 00-March '01 April-Oct '01
Perm-CA 1.10    .46      .56
SJ - CA  1.14    .56      .73
SJ-Waha   .35    .15      .24
Perm-Waha   .05    .05      .07


www.cnn.com georgie looks a little  constipated.


Sandeep,

Please,  help Margaret with L1 for Anshuman.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

Margaret Daffin
02/15/2001 11:47 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Anshuman

Molly:  I am meeting with Anshuman at 2:30 today and he will give me his
documents.

However, I still need everything from you, as listed in my emails of January
22 and February 13.  Please let me have this information asap so that I can
send the package to our attorneys for processing.

Thanks
Margaret

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           02/13/2001 09:41 AM

To: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Anshuman

I definitely think you should continue to "prod" Anshuman for his documents,
and I will follow up with Sandeep for the job description.

Thanks again for your help,
Molly

Margaret Daffin
02/13/2001 09:38 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Anshuman

Molly:  Sorry, but I don't have any job description templates as the job
description always comes from the HR recruiter/representative.

Do you want me to go ahead and send another email to Anshuman to get his
documents so that I can proceed with the visa application?
To date, I have not heard anything from him.

Please advise
Thanks
Margaret

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           02/12/2001 06:50 PM

To: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Anshuman

I spoke today to Sandeep Kohli about Anshuman's job description, and he said
that he would be happy to start on it right away (finally!).  Anyway, he then
asked if we had any job description templates for visa applications, and I
told him that I would check with you to see.   Can you help him with anything?

Molly


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Paulos" <ben@ef.org>
To: <calrps@yahoogroups.com>; "Don Fields" <FLAK2@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:04 PM
Subject: [calrps] Calpine brags about "very favorable margins" in DWR
contracts

> Calpine Benefiting From California Energy Crisis, Official Says
> By Daniel Taub
>
>
> San Jose, California, Aug. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Calpine Corp., a California
> power producer, has benefited from the state's energy crisis by locking in
> ``very favorable margins'' on long-term electricity sales, Senior Vice
> President James Macias said.
>
> About 90 percent of the electricity Calpine is generating this year is
being
> sold under long-term agreements to the state, Macias said on a conference
> call with analysts. A year ago, about 30 percent of Calpine's power was
> under contract, he said.
>
> Calpine, one of the largest U.S. power-plant builders, has been buying
> natural-gas fields to supply its power plants, spending about $1.9 billion
> from March last year to July to boost gas reserves to 1.5 trillion cubic
> feet. It also has bought gas in futures markets to help fix margins on
> electricity sales, Macias said.
>
> ``The California crisis, while not desired, has been a tremendous
> opportunity,'' Macias said. ``Calpine may be the only player emerging from
> the crisis with no overhang issues. We are emerging stronger than ever.''
>
> The long-term contracts have an average ``spark spread,'' or the
difference
> between revenue and the cost of fuel to generate the electricity, of
$26.50
> a megawatt-hour, Macias said. One megawatt-hour is enough energy to light
> 750 typical California homes for an hour.
>
> California has $43 billion in long-term energy contracts with Calpine and
> other generators. The state's Department of Water Resources began buying
> power on behalf of its three investor-owned utilities in January after the
> two largest, owned by PG&E Corp. and Edison International, became
insolvent
> buying power for more than they were allowed to charge customers.
>
> San Jose, California-based Calpine expects $16 billion in revenue over the
> next 20 years from contracts with the department, PG&E, the city of San
> Francisco, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District and other agencies.
> Most of the contracts are for 10 years or less.
>
> PG&E Payment
>
> Calpine is owed $267 million by PG&E's Pacific Gas & Electric, the state's
> largest utility, which filed for bankruptcy protection in April after
> accruing $9 billion in power-buying losses. Calpine expects to be paid
with
> interest after Pacific Gas submits its reorganization plan later this
year,
> Lisa Bodensteiner, Calpine's general counsel, said on the call.
>
> Calpine isn't owed money by Edison's Southern California Edison, which is
> negotiating a rescue plan with state lawmakers to keep California's No. 2
> utility out of bankruptcy, Macias said.
>
> Shares of Calpine fell 45 cents to $33.25. They have dropped 26 percent
this
> year.
> --
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
> Bentham Paulos
> Energy Foundation
> ben@ef.org
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> FREE COLLEGE MONEY
> CLICK HERE to search
> 600,000 scholarships!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/zoU8wD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/TgOolB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> calrps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


Attached for you review is a first draft of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for
Project 20/20.

At the request of Northern Border, this draft was based on the Purchase and
Sale Agreement used by Northern Border and Enron to purchase the Big Horn
membership interests.  Since the Big Horn agreement was not executed until
the closing, it does not include any closing conditions and certain other
closing mechanics.  Because the letter of intent for Project 20/20 identifies
several issues that will require further negotiation with Northern Border, I
assumed we would follow the same approach for this transaction and negotiate
those issues with Northern Border and then execute the Purchase and Sale
Agreement at the closing.  If Northern Border now wishes to execute the
Purchase and Sale Agreement before closing, we will need to complete our
negotiations of the open issues and add the appropriate preclosing provisions
to this draft, including closing conditions.

Please call me with your comments to this draft.

Thanks, Hal

 - HOU_562951_5.DOC


The following procedures have been developed by Walt, Mike and myself for the
Environmental matters associated with the Texas New Mexico Pipeline System.
Please pay special attention to Item No. 5 which is not only a change in
procedure but also a huge cost savings to EOTT.

We had a good visit last Thursday with the carrier.  The local representative
and our New York claim representative were present.  We were told repeatedly
that filing timely information and claim notification was required.  We
tempered their nice but stern stance with their own internal issues regarding
the change in our local representative.  All was friendly.  The bullet point
review of the meeting's discussions is as follows and there are several
procedural points that we will adopt going forward:

Expense reporting on the known and unknown sites will be filed  monthly and
the invoices will be provided also at that time.  ( providing the invoices
with the report is a change in the procedure).  I believe that I will be able
to pull the report information off of EMS Works going forward.  Please let me
know who in the organization will be responsible for getting the invoices
together so I can coordinate this process with them.
Invoices from our vendors need to be more descriptive.  Rich was in the
meeting when this was discussed and I have asked him to take this matter up
with our vendors.  In the field, if you see that the description is weak, (
for instance, "per work order") it would be helpful for you to contact the
vendor then as opposed to sending it through the payment process.  If it is
not descriptive enough to identify the work performed, payment will be
delayed and claims processing will be slowed.  This enhancement would also
seem to help us internally identify the expense.
When we are notified of a claim, be it land owner notification of an old
site, or a new spill, a spill/claim report should be filed. I believe that
this is the information that I will be receiving from EMS Works.  If it is an
issue that requires special handling, I will be happy to take this
information directly and outside the normal channels.  One area that will
need to be addressed is an estimate of claim size with each report...and an
update of that information as the claim matures if it changes materially.  I
am not clear if this information will be available in EMS Works or not.  Can
someone get back to me on this process?
As reports or correspondence from agencies/any third party are received, we
will need to forward these on to the carrier for each claim that has been
filed. Also, I will need to forward to the carrier any reports or
correspondence that we submit to agencies and third parties. The carrier does
not want to have to come to our offices to review files if it can be avoided
and would prefer to process these claims as they mature.  As you forward
these items to me for processing, please be sure that they are clearly
identifiable as to the site/claim number.
Any new claim ( that would mean any unknown) will be noticed to the carrier.
Before dispatching anyone from Entrix ( unless this is an emergency
situation),  we will notice the carrier and they will authorize the
investigation by Entrix or any other environmental consultant.  The carrier
has the right to choose who they use, however Entrix is one of  their
approved vendors.  I understand that Entrix charges us a fee for these
investigations and this is a covered expense under the policy.  This will
also aid in the processing of the claim as the carrier will accept their
requested Entrix report as their own investigative report. These charges will
be paid by the carrier, but they need to have the claim verified and then we
need to have them dispatch Entrix to the site.  I also suspect that the fee
that we have been charged by Entrix for these matters is in excess of the fee
that the carrier pays.  Therefore it is even more critical that we have the
carrier engage Entrix and pay them.  There are as I understand 38 task orders
( estimated to be $10,000/each) currently outstanding with Entrix.  I have a
copy of these and I would like to process these through the carrier where we
have not already incurred any expense.  Who can visit with me on the actual
status of any work performance under these orders?  We will need to calculate
work performed and get immediate authorization from the carrier to have
Entrix provide the service going forward for each site.
Lawsuits and paper work will be noticed to me by Legal.

As far as the action items on current updated claims:

Roger Pennifill, the technical claim handler for AIG, was in our offices
Thursday and Friday and with the assistance of Mike Kelly reviewed the files
and talked with the field personnel as needed.

The situation with Jimmie Cooper lawsuit is the top priority with the
carrier.  Cynthia Green will get back to me within a day or so to give me
feedback on the requests that we have made to authorize the fingerprinting of
the crude oil in the Cooper's well.  This matter takes precedence over the
filing an answer on the lawsuit.   Walt Zimmerman will work with Cynthia
Green on the selection of counsel for this matter.  Unless the carrier tells
us otherwise Paul Bohannon will continue to act as lead counsel for this
matter.  Walt will provide Cynthia Green with resumes for Paul Bohannon and
the local counsel that has been suggested.

The second highest priority is Jay Anthony.  We have given Cynthia and Roger
a complete write up on this situation and they will be coming back to us to
discuss the options that we have laid in front of them.

All other claims that we discussed, will be handled as their official
notification of a claim or an update as to the magnitude of the potential
problem.

In the area of site investigation (Example Clay Osborne), we will formally
ask that Entrix be approved to do the necessary  investigative work.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
05:21 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Anjam Ahmad                           10/26/2000 04:20 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT,
Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava
Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chonawee
Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shalesh Ganjoo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sevil
Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
SCHILMOELLER/ENRON@Gateway, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Hector
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Youyi Feng/NA/Enron@Enron, V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shane Green/HOU/EES@EES, Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Yana
Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron,
Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/EES@EES, Samantha T
Davidson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara E Turk/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bhavna Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Atticus R Lyon/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhur
Dayal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amir Ghodsian/LON/ECT@ECT, Imtiaz Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Sadia
Haider/LON/ECT@ECT, Natasha Danilochkina/LON/ECT@ECT, Martina
Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, Zuzana Strmenova/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Emmanuel Rialland/EU/Enron@ENRON, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Emily Boxall/LON/ECT@ECT, Mikael Nordstrom/LON/ECT@ECT,
James Stephen/LON/ECT@ECT, Ian Clark/LON/ECT@ECT, Brynjar
Wiersholm/LON/ECT@ECT, Stefan Fastesson/OSL/ECT@ECT, Bjarne
Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Thor
Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Trond Branem Hansen/OSL/ECT@ECT, Sandra Marie/LON/ECT@ECT,
Cecilia Turriago/NA/Enron@Enron, Helen Read/LON/ECT@ECT, Sophie
Smith/LON/ECT@ECT, Esther Gerratt/LON/ECT@ECT, Melanie Doyle/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter W Chan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Christian Hanell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandy
Schumacher/LON/ECT@ECT, Frank Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT,
Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Janne Lilleberg/HEL/ECT@ECT, Olle Enander/STO/ECT@ECT,
Amit Bartarya/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Foo/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Pearce/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Olivier
Herbelot/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Omer Muftuler/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jiri Novotny/LON/ECT@ECT, Jitendra
Patel/Market Risk Management/LON/ECT@ECT, Claire Viejou/LON/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Bedingfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT, Steve W Young/LON/ECT@ECT,
Kazeem Khan/LON/ECT@ECT, Sarah Knott/LON/ECT@ECT, John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT,
Silke Linke/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Mohamed
Bharadia/LON/ECT@ECT, Harjit Ruprai/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ulf Ek/LON/ECT@ECT, Padmesh Thuraisingham/LON/ECT@ECT, Cassim
Mangerah/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Jurgen Hess/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ward/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil Tarling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Rose Greenwood/LON/ECT@ECT, Catherine Woolgar/OSL/ECT@ECT, Jo
Kelsey/LON/ECT@ECT, Todd Stevens/LON/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Katrina
Bensadon/LON/ECT@ECT, Ruth Blunden/LON/ECT@ECT, Kate Bruges/LON/ECT@ECT,
Rashpal Bhatti/LON/ECT@ECT, Louis Redshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Ednan
Malik/LON/ECT@ECT, Maria Raftery/LON/ECT@ECT, Erik Hansen/LON/ECT@ECT, Ilona
Tonjes/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob Bayley/LON/ECT@ECT, Haakon Olafsson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Preben Richter/OSL/ECT@ECT, Lise
Edvardsen/OSL/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Graham Aley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron, Russell Plackett/EU/Enron@Enron, Andreas
Barschkis/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Renata Frankova/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ali Lloyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Didrik Thrane-Nielsen/OSL/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Laurelle Hughes/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew Nimmo/LON/ECT@ECT,
Lloyd Fleming/LON/ECT@ECT, Hector A Godoy/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom
Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Gillian Lister/LON/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Viacheslav Danilov/LON/ECT@ECT, Reza
Rezaeian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shabana Ahmad/LON/ECT@ECT, Zarin Imam/HOU/EES@EES,
Guy Little/LON/ECT@ECT, david.port@enron.com, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Message from Anjam S Ahmad

Dear All,

On 25th October I announced my resignation from Enron Europe to pursue other
opportunities.  I just wanted to say that the past 3 1/2 years has been a
very interesting and positive experience for me, having been a key part of
such a dynamic and fast-moving organisation.  Enron is by far the best
organisation I have ever worked for, and I am proud to have had the
opportunity to work here and become a shareholder.  I have found it a real
pleasure to have worked with such talented and interesting individuals as
exist within Enron Europe and Enron Corp in Houston & Portland and I
genuinely wish you the best of success going forward.  I would also like to
take this opportunity to thank Vince Kaminski, John Sherriff and Richard
Lewis for hiring me in April 97 and thereafter offering such interesting and
challenging projects to work on.

I have made some excellent friends at Enron and hope to keep them - I have a
base in London and will probably be visiting Houston soon, so please feel
free to stay in touch!

CONTACT:
E-mail:   citywhizkid@hotmail.com (easy to remember!)
Mobile:   0961 111 192
Home:    020 8877 9741
Address: Apt 213, Compass House, Riverside West, Smugglers Way, Wandsworth,
London SW18

I will be at the Talbot pub tomorrow Friday 27th October from 6pm where I
hope to catch up with you as a final farewell!

Best wishes for the future!

Anjam
x35383


Gentlemen,

Today I finally received some information on the status of the work done to
date.  I spoke to Hugo Alexandro at Cuatro Consultants.  The property is
still in two parcels.  Hugo has completed a platt to combine into one  lot
and is ready to submit it to the city of San Marcos.  He has also completed a
topographical survey and a tree survey.  In addition, he has begun to
coordinate with the city on the replatting and a couple of easements on the
smaller parcel, as well as, beginning the work on the grading.  Hugo is going
to fax me a written letter of the scope of work he has been engaged to
complete.  The total cost of his services are estimated at $38,000 of which
$14,000 are due now for work completed.

We are trying to resolve the issues of outstanding work and bills incurred by
the original developer so we can obtain the title to the land.  If we can
continue to use Cuatro then it would be one less point of contention.  Hugo's
number is 512-295-8052.  I thought you might want to contact him directly and
ask him some questions.  I spoke to him about the possibility of your call
and he was fine with that.

Now we are going to try and determine if any of the work performed by Kipp
Flores can be used.

Keith and I appreciate you meeting with us on Sunday.  We left very
optimistic about the prospect of working with you on this project.

Call me with feedback after you speak to Hugo or with any other ideas about
moving this project forward.

Phillip


Here's what I have on H-2.  Sorry Pete, I thought I had sent it to you
previously.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/11/2001 11:00
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/21/2000 04:25:08 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: john.r.ayres@enron.com

Subject: FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope

I'm forwarding this per my conversion with John Ayres as the Training insert
H-2

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Sent:   Friday, March 17, 2000 3:50 PM
> To:   'kathleen.clark@enron.com'; 'michael.d.nanny@enron.com'
> Cc:   Davis, David F (PS, SSEP); Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP);
> 'chris.booth@enron.com'
> Subject:   FW: ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
>
> Kathy/Mike-
>
> Attached is our latest Training Course agenda.  Since our Engine and
> Packaging businesses are now organized as one, we've combined the Engine
> Familiarization and Generator Set Operator Training Courses into a single
> Training Course.  We would envision providing this training at each
> Facility Site.
>
> This outline should be used to replace the language in Exhibit H-2 to
> accurately describe the current course agenda.  We'll discuss the content
> in detail on Tuesday with Mike, to be sure that nothing is dropped from
> the Training content.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Kuo, Kathy (PS, SSEP)
> Sent:   Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:12 AM
> To:   Roy Allice (E-mail)
> Cc:   Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
> Subject:   ENRON - Meeting - Training Scope
>
> Roy,
>
> 1.  MEETING INFORMATION:
> Who:   Enron, Lee Johnson, Kathy Kuo, Roy Allice
> Where:   Downtown Houston. 3 Allen Center, 333 Clay St., Suite 400
> (sign in).
> When:   1:30 PM - ?  (Lee Johnson to confirm)
>
>
> 2.  Attached is the file David Davis sent to Lee for Enron Training Scope.
> Note that it is the 5-day Basic Op.
>
>  <<Training LM6000.pdf>>
>
> 3.  Please confirm (per our discussion this morning) that you will be able
> to attend this meeting.  If not, please let me know if there is someone
> that can attend in your place.
>
>
> Thanks!
> Kathy


our stock is taking a bath.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:20 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

 i was just about to email you.  why is it worthless?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:14 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

my 401k is now worthless.  i have no money.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:28 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   how was portland

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:49 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   great.  good to hear.  i got back last night.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:15 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      yeah, it was horrible, i didn't think i was going to be able to make
   it.
      when did you get back.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:54 AM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject:

      did you miss me while i was gone?

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and
      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the
      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply
      to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
      all
      copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2001 11:00 AM -----

	"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontiereconomics.com>
	07/13/2001 10:40 AM
	Please respond to seabron.adamson

		 To: <Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>
		 cc: "Sabine Schnittger" <sabine.schnittger@frontier-economics.com>
		 Subject: RE: Outline for affidavit re: June 19th Order

Here is the attachment...

My error

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

 - Outline response June 19 FERC Order.doc


<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/home/home.html/ref=mk_cust_super_1>
Search Amazon.com for:   Go!

We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication Preferences <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/468552/ref=mk_cust_super_3> and click the Customer Communication Preferences link.

Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: ebass@enron.com

  <http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/marketing/html-mailings/tracking/open.gif?XDECTXC9M5HJYP>


Leslie --

Please let me know what you need to get this issue properly defined by EES.  One option, maybe, would be to take the customers back to sales service.  Would there be any problems with this?  Please let me know.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Southwest Gas

FYI. Apparently we turned back sales customers in Arizona served by Southwest Gas but we are still on the hook for their gas costs.  Altho I was in contact with EES virtually daily since December on about the SW problems, I was told that we were able to terminate their contracts, and was not aware of the lingering exposure issue on pricing until I started getting emails last week.  Needless to say I am not pleased and EES is trying to find a regulatory fix to this problem.  If I had known about it last winter, I would have been able to explain it to them.  I don't think I can get this fixed, and they should have kept the customers, as the delivery problems cleared up in the spring.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

On cash-outs, Southwest takes the highest price paid for any incremental volume and applies it to all cash out volumes.  This is the issue we took up at the ACC and argued that it should be based on actual costs, not the single highest price.  BUT this is a different issue than the actual cost of gas for sales purposes.  I would think that the sales gas is based on actual incremental costs.  There is a possibility this can be audited, but we would have to go to the ACC, and as in California, they will not be at all sympathetic to us. They will view this an Enron problem.  I just say that so that you don't think that I can fix this easily (I doubt that I can fix this at all, but let's see what we get from the ACC on the cash out issue, that will be a good indicator.  We were clearly right on that one).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Colleen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

Leslie-
Is there any way to know what their incremental cost of gas is or how it is calculated?  For example, if SW Gas buys 10,000 MMBtu total for the month at $5.00 and all other purchases were at $3.00, and EES' sales gas for that month was 90,000 MMBtu, can they charge $5.00 for all 90,000?  Are there any audit rights?  Also, I heard that we hired a law firm awhile back to address this issue???  Do you know anything about that or what they did/accomplished?  You may be hearing more about this from Don Black or Jess Hewitt--there is a huge concern about our exposure this winter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Shireman, Kristann
Cc:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

Under 3.2 of its Transportation Tariff, a SW Gas transportation customer in Arizona who returns to sales will pay the higher of the Gas Commodity Cost (plus any adjustments) or the incremental cost of gas, for a period of 12 months, and then the customer will go back to the PGA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shireman, Kristann
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Cc:	Sullivan, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Southwest Gas

We are trying to determine the cost of gas for the customers we have turned back to SWG in Arizona.
Thx
Kris S

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawner, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Shireman, Kristann
Subject:	Southwest Gas

I assume you found the Southwest Gas Nevada tariff online and checked that rate schedules there?  the commodity cost was $.49390 and there is also a balancing account adjustment.  They file to change their PGA once a year and this year they have proposed no change.


Good morning gentlemen:

I will go ahead and schedule the conference call for Wednesday, May 31st
at 11:00 AM EST (10:00 CST).   Please let me know the telephone numbers
you may be reached at and Vince will call you.

If you find you cannot do this, please let me know.

Thanks and have a wonderful weekend.

Shirley Crenshaw

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
08:11 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
05/25/2000 03:54 PM
To: oliver@risk.co.uk, jefferid@kochind.com, sbramlet@utilicorp.com
cc:
Subject: Risk 2000 panel discussion

Hello everyone:

Vince Kaminski would be available for a conference call on Wednesday,
May 31 at 10:00 or 11:00 AM EST.  The rest of the day is rather full.

Please let me know if either time is convenient for you.  If not, maybe we
could do it on June 1 - he is free most of the day with the exception of
12:30 - 2:00 EST.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Corp. Research
713-853-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Do these look reasonable.   What are the costs charged to fundies?   The allocations are confusing to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Killen, Faith
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 7:39 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Colwell, Wes; Perlman, Beth
Subject:	2002 IT Systems Development  Allocations
Importance:	High

Kevin & Tim,
Please review the attached listing and advise if you agree to the projects and amounts listed as billings that Enron North America will receive in 2002 for support of these efforts. I'm at x30352 if you have any questions. Thanks!


I haven't actually done anything yet, but my model is built, I just need to add the inputs (vol, price, correl...).  I will call you when I do.  Thanks.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cramer, Chris
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	spread option pricing

Hi John,

I'm the one who's working with eric on the spread option price. Jared indicated you'd get him something today....could you tell me what your using for you vols (FGT/MKTAREA and correlations (between Z2/Z3, and between (Z2/Z3) and FGT/MKTAREA)? Also, once I've plugged in the numbers if you'd like to see my results, let me know.

thanks,

cjc


Get on internal MSN IM

Mullett


Michelle,

Jay Epstein from the EIM Pulp & Paper Group tells me that certain Garden
State Paper employees are providing technical support services on sales calls
for newsprint.  He asks whether they can be given Enron name cards in
addition to GSP name cards.  It is possible that these individuals will be
supporting Crane sales as well.  I told him I needed to check with you in
light of your concerns regarding co-employer liability.  I guess this issue
also raises questions regarding whether we are opening the door to claims by
these GSP employees that they are entitled to Enron benefits.

Thoughts?

Pete

****************************************************
Peter del Vecchio
Senior Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith, 38th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
Tel:       (713) 853-9875
Fax:      (713) 646-3393
e-mail: Peter.del.Vecchio@enron.com
*****************************************************


Tom,

Laura said you just left - sorry I missed you.  Please see the attached schedule for the reductions I made to Employee Expense, Outside Services and Rent.  If you have a problem with any of these or want to discuss further, give me a call tomorrow.

Laynie
x3-3131


I di d not do any deals with Roger for that time frame.  You need to find out
who he talked to.


remember this for my pbr (whatever the letters are for our reivew).

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/25/01 04:10 PM

		 To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Brief CA from Scott.DOC

You're a saint(esse).


Hello all

Some of Enron Confirmation Letters are able to fit on one page, example: Duke
Energy Marketing and Trading LLC are often able to fit on one page (not all
the time).  In the past Duke one page Confirmation Letters we coming over
with a number 1 on the bottom, but both signatures (Enron and Counterparty)
were included.  We have taken the page number out of the template and
hopefully all is corrected.  If you see an Enron Confirmation Letter with
both signatures included although it might have a Page 1 on the bottom, and
no other changes, it is okay to Execute the Confirmation Letter.  If you have
any questions, please let me know!

Thanks
Stephanie
39210


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 2/1/2001 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to Legal
and Credit.


Vince where did this resume come from and is he still employed by the
National Bank in Monteal.


Greetings:
My apologies.  I was out of town over the weekend and while I thought I'd
have network access, I didn't.  Here's the presentation from the talk I gave
in New York on 01.29.01.  I'll be updating it, but will work from these
slides (as notes--no formal presentation).

If you have any questions, just give a holler.  415.782.7822.  Look forward
to meeting on Wednesday.

Best,
Jeff


Here is the completed list for the year 2000

        total $1470.00
                                   Thanks

                                                     Kevin Moore

Kevin G Moore
12/05/2000 10:56 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Christmas Basket List

Here is the updated list that we have for Christmas.

The orders will be placed on Dec.12th.
The orders will arrive at the Enron Building Dec.19th. and all outside orders
will arrive before Dec.22nd.

Please inform  , if this is okay .

Thanks
                                                                       Kevin
Moore

I will discuss cost with Vince after meeting with Bill on Friday.

Kevin G Moore
12/01/2000 09:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Christmas Basket List

Hello Everyone ,

We are nearing the time to get the baskets and other  Christmas tokens sent
out.
As in every year , we do take the time to send tokens of appreciation
for services rendered ,  or share the Christmas sprit with those we feel
worthty.
Here is the list that I have already , Approved by Vince.

If there are any additions please inform me A.S.A.P.

The Deadline is December 12th , as I will be meeting with the
owner of Floral Events to confirm the order and treat him to
lunch for all the great work he has provided for me.

                                     Thanks
                                 Kevin Moore

Please note : I will be out on Vacation and all orders will already have been
placed
with the delivery date on December 19th. the day of my return,
therefore if any problems occur I will have enough time to solve them.


CONGRATULATIONS!!!
PAT JOHNSON is the winner for +The Name This Newsletter Contest,.  It was a
close call. After receiving over 50 great ideas, the PR Dept had a tough time
narrowing the list to the top ten for Mark Frevert,s final decision.  We,d
like to thank everyone who submitted suggestions and a special thanks to Pat
Johnson for sending in the winning name EnTouch.

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

EGM Coal & Emissions
The November and December NYMEX market remains very tight.  Offers in the OTC
market have climbed to the low $40s.  The highest reported trade for December
was reported at $38.50.   The tightness should continue through the first
half of the year  with the Martin County mine still shut down.  The rest of
the year remains strong piggy backing off of the current spot market.

Finally--Life beyond the 150 to 155 range--vintage year 2000 SO2 allowances
broke out of this trading range this week.  The low trade was around $119.50
and the last trade was around $120.50.  The sharp drop in prices was caused
in large part by the news of Dominion Virginia Power settling the New Source
Review lawsuit brought against it by the state of NY and the EPA Continuing
rumors of further NSR related settlements will likely create continued
volatility.  It is as yet unclear what the new price floor will be.

NOx has settled down a bit with last trade 2001 vintage of $675.

Principal Investments
Solo Energy Corporation, an Alameda, California based developer of Wireless
Energy microturbine products to supply superior on-site energy service to
U.S. commercial and light industrial customers, announced that Enron North
America has completed an equity investment in Solo Energy as well as entered
into an alliance agreement.

In exchange for warrants to purchase the Company,s preferred stock, Enron
will assist in obtaining fuel contracts to support the Company,s distributed
generation contracts, including the provision of gas and backup electricity,
and will work with the Company to support its market and gas technology
research.

NEWS FROM THE GLOBALFLASH

EnronCredit.com
On Halloween, Enron Credit.com hit the City of London last Tuesday. As an
original PR stunt, the EnronCredit.com team organized a Grim Reaper with two
female vampires to distribute candy carrying the message, "Corporate
bankruptcies are on the increase and could be your worst nightmare. You can
protect your company and sleep well at night". Locations for the distribution
of 5,000 packs of candy were Bank, Broadgate and Canary Wharf. The general
feedback and reaction of people was positive. Photos of the event will be
available on the EnronCredit.com site.

Enron Japan Corp.
Enron is powering ahead in Japan following the official launch of Enron Japan
Corp. in Tokyo last week.  In keeping with Japanese tradition, Ken Lay, Joe
Hirl, Ken Rice and Mike McConnell donned "happi coats" - a sort of short
kimono - and used ceremonial hammers to break the lid of a wooden cask of
sake in front of an audience of 350 drawn from major companies and
government.  Enron has made an immediate impact already by offering eligible
consumers 3-5 year contracts with immediate savings of up to 10 percent in
the first year.   View the Japan website at www.enron.co.jp  [No worries,
it's in Japanese and English ...Ed]

There are 35 Enron employees in the Tokyo office including an Enron Metals
team.  EBS will be staffing up there over the coming months.

Nordic energy agreement with UPM-Kymmene
Enron Nordic Energy and UPM-Kymmene Corp. have signed a two-year portfolio
management agreement covering UPM Kymmene's Nordic power portfolio. The
Mid-Market desk in the Oslo office will assist UPM in optimising its
portfolio of approximately 14 TWh. energydesk.com will provide UPM with the
risk management system used in the process. In addition, the agreement opens
the door for Enron Energy Services to explore a variety of opportunities
within the company. The Nordic agreement is the first step towards a broader
scope of co-operation with UPM on a European and Global basis. The total
contract value is estimated to be $375 million.

UPM-Kymmene's nominal electricity resources total about 3000 MW, of which
2500 MW in Finland and about 500 MW in other countries. The group's power
procurement totals approximately 18 TWh per year, of which about 14 TWh in
Finland. Around 15 TWh/a is consumed by the group's own mills and the rest is
sold to the market.

http://www.upm-kymmene.com
http://www.upm-kymmene.com/upm/energy/energybuild.html

The deal was led by Sami Tenngren - Nordic Mid-Market, and was supported by
Magnus Groth - EES, Jukka Hormaluoma - energydesk.com, and Martin Rosell -
Legal.

Congratulations on a job well done to all those who worked so hard to put
this transaction into place........Thor Lien.

Australia
Despite heavy flooding in NSW, the weather is looking up for Enron
Australia.  Last week, the Sydney Office launched online Hong Kong weather
derivatives  and the Sydney weather node traded on EnronOnline in the US time
zone.  With this precedent, we hope to support the takeoff of global weather
on EnronOnline.

The Coal Group in Sydney has suddenly become very popular. There is no doubt
that a recent sale to AES for the plant at Barbers Point, Hawaii is the real
reason.  Coal purchases during year 2000 have been concluded with most major
producers in Indonesia and Australia.  We will soon be loading our first
shipment from China. Deliveries to Nippon Steel in Japan are underway. Also,
a shipment to a large power utility in Japan will take place in early 2001.

Off-shore wind plans
Enron has entered into agreement to purchase the development assets of a 30
MW offshore wind project in the UK.  The Harwich project, situated in
Gunfleet Sands approximately eight kilometres offshore in the North Thames
Estuary is believed to represent one of the first serious investments in the
development of offshore wind energy in the UK.

ENRONONLINE STATISTICS

Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of November 27, 2000.

* Total Life to Date Transactions> 464,000
* Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $263 billion

NUGGETS & NOTES

"How does your earnings target look for the quarter?" ) Brent Price,
VP/Operations & Chief Accounting Officer for EGM

"Always price the illiquidity risk premium appropriately!" ) Doug Friedman,
Director of Financial Petrochemicals and Plastics

What people say to Julie Gomez,VP/Upstream Services-ENA - "I heard your laugh
clear across the floor!!!"

IN THE NEWS

"The uncertainty [of the presidential election] does not influence business.
It is a relatively short-term distraction. Our business model has not changed
and will not change as a result of the election because we've worked very
well with both the Clinton/Gore administration in Washington and the Bush
administration in Texas."
-- Mark Palmer, vice president of Enron Corporate Communications, Associated
Press

"The name of Enron may be unfamiliar in Japan, but it should not stay that
way for long.........Joseph Hirl, president of Enron Japan, says: "We don't
go in and try to destroy markets - we go in and create them."  Some of the
company's potential customers and business partners may still need to be
persuaded of that, but Enron has a large stock of experience to reassure
them".---Financial Times

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Lydia Atwood-Minter, Kenneth Thibodeaux, Lacye Trevino-Brymer
EGM )Humaira Badat, Daiquiri Lucas

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Trinh Abrell, Terri Austin, Guillermo Balmaceda, Eric Booth, Robert
Chmielewski, Joyce Dorsey, Sharon Gonzales, Laura Gutierrez, Scott Healy,
Dawn Kenne, Robert Kraszewski, Sandra Morris, David Porter, Daniel Quezada,
Henry Quigley, Steven Rose, Felecia Russell, Mary Symes, Dan Williams,
Rosalinda Zermeno
EGM ) Braedi Craig, Scott Baukney, Samantha Davidson, David Loosley, John
Massey, Diana Monaghan, Adam Siegel, Ioannis Tzamouranis

LEGAL STUFF

The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:14
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/10/2000 09:13 AM

To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, al.larsen@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

I believe this to be the latest draft of the PSCO change order.
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 09:11
AM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 05:36 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris.booth@enron.com
cc:

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

Kay, Ben & Chris:

Attached is the latest draft of Change Order #2 for your review & input:

Kathy


pls print asap.  thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/09/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           02/08/2000 11:08 AM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, fkelly@gbmdc.com,
sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Gallup compliance filing

Here is a draft of the compliance filing regarding our operational control
agreement with ECS.  Please let me know your comments by C.O.B. tomorrow.  At
this point I'm not planning to file the agreement, just a report as requested
by the Commission.

I'm still working with ECS to finalize the agreement.  Their attorney is
checking with his resident experts to make sure ECS, by expressly giving TW
Operational Control, does not somehow cross the line into retail wheeling.  I
do not expect the agreement to change significantly.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
05/01/2001 11:50 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals that still need to be flipped to P& book right away

Hey Phillip,

I'm not sure if you were forwarded this message yesterday, so I'm sending it
to you today.
Could you please flip the deals that are in your book to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS
book
as soon as possible.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey Vallejo/CAL/ECT on 05/01/2001
10:44 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
04/30/2001 04:40 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals that still need to be flipped to P& book right away

Hi guys,

Could you please go through all your books and see if there are any ECC deals
in them for April or May settlements.  I've gone through a few and here are
some deals that need to be flipped before noon tomorrow at the latest as I
need to invoice them tomorrow.

FT-EAST

G-DAILY-EST

GD-CENTRAL

Please make sure that all these deals are flipped to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book
before noon Houston time on May first.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey


The attached schedule is for Thursday, Jan 31.  Associated text files will be posted to Sparky today.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager
Load Forecasting Desk
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


Not a problem. I think that we got a good deal and you should Not be getting dinged for that deal.  Other than the Trigen deal, let me know if there are other deals that are a problem and I will look into them. I want to get all of that stuff cleaned up.  Happy Thanksgiving.

Frank
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Hafrank vickers


Attached is our protest filed last week.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
10:34 AM ---------------------------

 - ERRATATO.WPD


Thanks for your note.  We're hanging in there.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Fishkin, Charles A" <cfishkin@kpmg.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:05 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Jones, Tana
Subject:	note

well, how is it going down there?

Charles
*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************


Email sent by Kim Hillis 02/06


Yes, ENA Upstream Company LLC is the entity that deals with ENA's transactions with producers, similar to the way HPL (Houston Pipe Line Company) was dealing with producers.

As for Fred Lagrasta, I've already created a document (copy attached) asking for Lagrasta to be named a V.P.  I don't know where it is in the signing cues of the relevant officers, but it may need to be changed since the directors have changed since I created the doc.  Have you by any chance seen this signed document?  I sent it to the 33rd floor to be signed, and I haven't had it returned.

Please advise, and thanks,
Best wishes,
Mary
x37796
EWS Legal


It should be under Diaz, Ann, if she got an invite.  Surely she got invited.


Jim a BIG external factor that is directed to the item (2) ISO Systems &
Procedures:

At the NERC Electronic Scheduling Task Force meeting today, there was
considerable discussion on how this Task Force (which was formed before the
OASIS ANOPR was posted) would coordinate on an industry-wide basis, a NERC
response to the OASIS Phase II ANOPR.

Here are some important points a FERC Staff member (Marv Rosenberg) made at
the meeting.  These should be kept in mind in developing the Enron proposal
and the process of getting buy-in in each of the Regions/RTOs.

-  FERC prefers a single industry consensus filing.
-  The ANOPR is intended to tie RTO Order 2000 together with new OASIS II
requirements
-  Does not preclude individual RTOs or entities from submitting proposals.
However a diversity of filings will indicate   non-consensus and FERC will
make its own decisions which will likely not be industry friendly.

FERC is asking the industry for communication and Business Practices
standards for issuing in a NOPR.

FERC is looking for:
- more functionality and to be more user-friendly
- electronic scheduling
- electronic reservations
- reduce duplication of information entry for customers
- not intended to dictate the Control Area to Control Area communications
 I asked Marv to clarify this - He explained that although not required, FERC
welcomes propsals to address the control area   source/sink issues as part of
an OASIS II solution (ie Entergy Source/Sink Order)

OASIS II should:
- continue use of Web browsers
-  use templates for file transfers (uploads and downloads)
- all displays do not have to look the same - but encourages a common look
and feel
- within a RTO, business practicese may differ, but between RTOs the
practices must be standardized

We need to keep close to the NERC efforts since FERC has historically tended
to favor NERC proposals because they tout an air of industry consensus.

The clarificaton to the ANOPR given by Marv should make buy-in an important
element of our proposal.
If FERC adopts the NERC filing, we will likely be stuck with the exisiting
contract path seams problems and LMP fragmentation in the East because NERC
is not proposing any tariff changes.  Also we will not get the control area
source/sink issue resolved since it will be impossible to resolve at NERC in
7 months.

Of course, another option would be to incorporate our efforts with this Task
Force.

James D Steffes@EES
08/02/2000 05:52 PM
To: Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Charles
Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron McNamara/HOU/EES@EES,
Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin
Kittel/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/HOU/EES@EES, Daniel
Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Transmission / Wholesale Market Regional Plans

1. I appreciate everyone who participated in the call today.  I think that
the discussion proved that we can find consensus on a reasonable approach for
transmission pricing and energy markets.

2. To make more clear about the Regional Plans, I think that we need to
consider the following.

A. BACKGROUND

Timelines of Current Process
Current Players & Current Positions
Allies
Key Issues now facing the process

B. MOVING FORWARD

Top Issues upcoming
External Factors (e.g., will Entergy join SPP)
Resource Needs
Relationship to Commercial Objectives / Business Plans

C. OTHER ISSUES / CONCLUSION

I hope this helps set an outline for the Regional Plans.  The key idea is
that I want to make sure everyone has a calendar of where we are going and
what issues need to be addressed.  Don't be shy about adding other topics and
issues.  We need to have this to communicate within our group and to the
commercial people.  I don't expect this to be easy, but I think that it will
be helpful.

3. I think that we need to put more detail around the entire structure.  This
would entail developing four things (1) a tariff, (2) ISO Systems &
Procedures, (3) Day Ahead PX Energy Market, (4) Transmission Flowgate PX
Market.  These are the four building blocks to a New Marketplace.

My hope is for Enron to put these things out in a detailed framework using
"off the shelf" material.  I know that Tom Delaney has already started
working on a tariff.  I think we could adapt the Cal PX model into point 3.
We could probably use the APX Flowgate System for point 4.  On the ISO, maybe
we could go to ESCA and have a Detailed Scope / Work Plan and fees on setting
up an ISO (including costs of operation over time).  It would make sense to
me to do this very formally (including setting energy market zones and
defining the commercially significant Flowgates).  I would use the MISO as
the market to focus on, but am willing to listen to other thoughts.

Please let me know what everyone thinks.

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
06:35 PM ---------------------------

Dplflan@aol.com on 10/18/2000 06:18:51 PM
To: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com
cc:
Subject: (no subject)

Ben-
This is a lengthy info/doc request - please give me feedback on how best we
can close the loop.

Thanks
Susan Flanagan

 - DocReq 001013b.doc


Set up for Wed
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 10:25 AM -----

	Robert Frank@ENRON
	06/07/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CA litigation

Richrd - I'd like to stop by in the next few days for a quick update me on
the CA litigation - I've been away on vacation and hear there have been a few
recent developments.  Thanks


Chris,

What is the latest...

Thanks,

Ken


I'll be at the Texas Gas shin dig.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Goodell, Scott
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:24 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	??????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Overton, Michelle" <Michelle.Overton@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Overton+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMichelle+2EOverton+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Goodell, Scott
Cc:	Grindal, Corey
Subject:	Golf

Hey Scott -

Do you and Chris Germany want to join Corey and I for golf the afternoon of
Oct 12th?  That way I can pick your brain for hours...just kidding:)

Michelle R. Overton
Principal Capacity Trader
El Paso Corporation Eastern Pipeline Group
Nine Greenway Plaza
Houston, Tx 77046
(832)676-5128
fax (832)676-1605
michelle.overton@elpaso.com

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


I took 1 hour for Dr.'s appt. on July 7th.   All other time is same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I believe this is deal 580169....the cp should be El Paso not Calpine per
Bloomberg.

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal  per Bloomberg:
Enron buys from El Paso 25 mw Q3'01 SP light at $228

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001
04:23 PM ---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer
04/12/2001 04:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/12/2001 Checkout

BLOOMBERG

Jeff Richter
deal 580280
Bloomberg does not recognize

Chris Mallory
I am missing the following deal  per Bloomberg:
Enron buys from El Paso 25 mw Q3'01 SP light at $228

deal 580168
Bloomberg shows fee of $.005

Mike Swerzbin
deal 580159
Bloomberg shows fee of $.005

PREBON
All deal are o.k.

Amerex West
All deals are o.k.


Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com

Ken: I had breakfast with Bill Ramsey this morning. He is currently the
Deputy Director of the International Energy Agency in Paris and is in
Washington to make contact with a variety of people. He had some excellent
comments on what is happening across the globe in energy and environment. I
suggested that he get directly in contact with you to share those details
which could be of interest to you and President George W. Bush. Bill
mentioned that there will be an IEA conference in Paris next May and he is
likely to ask your participation. Bill as always has substantive things to
say. See you in San Antonio. Joe


Forwarded at request of Joe Hillings:

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/10/99
01:15 PM ---------------------------

"Leibowitz, Lewis E." <LELeibowitz@HHLAW.com> on 12/10/99 10:41:07 AM

Attached is our press release on the addition of Hugo Paemen, former EU
Delegation Head, to our firm.  We're very excited about welcoming Hugo to
our firm.

The release is reprinted below if you cannot open the icon.

For Immediate Release:
December 8, 1999
Contact: Hogan & Hartson L.L.P Bob Glen Odle (202) 637-5639 Richard
Weiner (32-2) 505-0931
Ambassador Hugo Paemen, Former Head of the European Commission's Washington
Delegation, Joins Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
Washington, D.C., December 8, 1999 - Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., a Washington,
D.C.-based law firm with more than 650 attorneys and 16 offices throughout
the United States and Europe, is pleased to announce that Hugo Paemen, until
recently Head of the European Commission's Washington Delegation, has joined
the firm as Senior Advisor. Ambassador Paemen will split his time between
the firm's Washington and Brussels offices. He will advise U.S., European,
and other companies concerning their dealings with the European institutions
and will provide counsel on a wide variety of trade and investment matters
involving the European Union and the United States. In addition to his
position at Hogan & Hartson, Ambassador Paemen will serve as Senior Advisor
to the German Marshall Fund.

Ambassador Paemen was nominated to the position of Head of the European
Commission's Washington Delegation in July 1995. Between 1987 and that date,
Ambassador Paemen served as Deputy Director-General of the European
Commission's Trade Directorate, where among his many accomplishments he
served as the European Community's Chief Negotiator during the entire length
of the Uruguay Round. From 1985 to 1987 he served as the official spokesman
of the first Delors Commission, and from 1978 to 1985 he served as Chef de
Cabinet of Commissioner Viscount Davignon. Prior to 1978, Ambassador Paemen
held various positions in the Belgian Embassies in Geneva, Paris and
Washington, including service as Economic Minister in the Washington Embassy
from 1974 to 1978. He is presently Special Adviser to European Commission
President Romano Prodi and a Member of the Board of the Catholic University
of Leuven.

"We are extremely pleased that Ambassador Paemen is joining the firm," said
Bob Glen Odle, Hogan & Hartson Managing Partner. "His many years of
experience at the European Commission and his broad-based knowledge of
international trade issues will benefit immensely our clients on both sides
of the Atlantic."

In Washington, D.C., Ambassador Paemen will work with the firm's commercial
and regulatory practice groups to assist clients engaged in investment and
international trade matters. In Brussels, where the firm's practice includes
areas such as competition, communications, food, biotechnology, trade,
arbitration, and international transactions, he will work with resident
attorneys to provide clients with strategic counseling on a wide range of EU
issues. Ambassador Paemen will also assist attorneys in the firm's six other
European offices with matters involving EU law and policy.

"Ambassador Paemen has given the European Union outstanding representation
here in the United States," said Clayton Yeutter, Of Counsel to Hogan &
Hartson and a former United States Trade Representative. "He is a brilliant
diplomat and one of the world's most gifted and respected trade negotiators.
His international trade knowledge is encyclopedic."

"I view this next phase in my career as continuing my life-long commitment
to fostering better international trade and investment relations, in
particular between Washington and Brussels," said Ambassador Paemen. "I have
long been impressed by Hogan & Hartson's experience in these areas and the
sophisticated advice they offer their clients. I look forward to joining the
Hogan & Hartson team."

Hogan & Hartson, which was founded in 1904, has European offices in
Brussels, Budapest*, London, Moscow, Paris*, Prague*, and Warsaw, and U.S.
offices in Washington, D.C., New York, Los Angeles, Denver, Colorado
Springs, Boulder, Baltimore, and Northern Virginia.

*Affiliated Office

**********************************************************************
This electronic message transmission contains information from the
law firm of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. which may be confidential or
privileged.  The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended
recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
use of the contents of this information is prohibited.

If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please notify us by telephone (202-637-5600) or by
electronic mail (PostMaster@HHLAW.COM) immediately.
**********************************************************************
(V1.5)
 - att1.unk


FYI.  I'll bring you the ONSI confidentiality agreement.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 05:51
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/26/2000 08:35 AM

To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FCE/Confidential

Hi Dan,

One more thing I want to mention.  As you know, Enron has a confidentiality
agreement with a competitor of Fuel Cell (I believe it is ONSI).  The
agreement has an exclusivity arrangement, which prevents the other company
from chasing certain transactions without Enron.  Once we really know what we
are going to do with FCE, will it be necessary/advisable to waive the
exclusivity provision to avoid any restraint of trade arguments?

FYI, When I last discussed the other company with Ozzie and Heather on
Friday, they were planning on calling the other company to tell them the
general status without violating confidentiality obligations to FCE or CRRA.
I will follow up to get the details of the discussion.

Kay


Bill,

I will be happy to follow up on this.  But I think we at least need to
consider the ramifications of entering into brokerage agreements with brokers
who accept non-cash credit from their customers.  If they are willing to
offer credit to Enron, they are bound to do so with others.  Enron's
funds/accounts will be pooled with all other customers in the event  of a
financial crisis at the broker.  To the extent the broker has granted credit
to unworthy trading partners, Enron could have exposure if those partners
default, thus causing this financial distress at the broker.

I don't wish to overblow this concern (i.e., focus excessively on low
probability events), but I think we should at least discuss it a few minutes
before we proceed.

	From:  William S Bradford @ ECT                           07/28/2000 07:31 PM

To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Margin leverage and Enron Guarantee

Paul,

Can you work with Sara on this?

Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by William S Bradford/HOU/ECT on 07/28/2000
07:31 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           07/28/2000 01:23 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Margin leverage and Enron Guarantee

Bill and Sara,
We have been talking with Goldman Sachs, one of ECT Investment's prime
brokers,  about ways to reduce our margin requirement and gain greater
leverage.  Goldman suggested that we may want to consider putting an Enron
Guaranttee in place.

We also have a prime broker agreement with Morgan Stanley.  Per the
documentation that I have... I do not see a guarantte with Morgan Stanley.

1) Can you confirm that no guarantee exists with either Goldman or Morgan?
2) Any comments regarding a Goldman guarantee by Enron Corp for ECT
Investments Inc.?

Thanks, Sheila


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080557&Page=MyReq.


Hello All-

Attached above are the cover letter and proposed tariff sheets filed by Texas Eastern yesterday for a June 1 effective date.  The rate changes reflect under recoveries in their ASA account which tracks their cash-out mechanism and increased cost of system fuel.  The underrecovery in the ASA account has increased from $22,000 to over $22,000,000 over the period September 1--March 31.  Texas Eastern claims that this is largely a result of the gaming of their currently monthly cash-out (which will likely be changed to weekly in their 637 proceeding).  As a result, Texas Eastern is seeking a waiver of the annual filing period in order to begin collecting the underrecovery through a surcharge that would amount to as much as $.0354 from ELA-M3.  Texas Eastern proposes to begin recovery in June so as to extend the recovery period from 12 months (Dec-Nov) to 18 months (Jun-Nov), which will lower the level of the surcharge.

We'll review the filing to see if there are any grounds for protest / comment.  These types of dollars are usually "rubber-stamped" by FERC for pass-through but the filing to change the recovery time period may give us some grounds to protest the recovery.

 The full filing can be found at :  http://infopost.link.duke-energy.com/infopost/default.asp?pipe=TE

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information.

Thanks,
Suzanne


Shirley

yes.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/05/2001 02:25 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Institute of International Finance - Annual Subscription

Vince:

Is this ok to pay?

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
02:19 PM ---------------------------
From: Sharon Purswell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/05/2001 12:53 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Institute of International Finance - Annual Subscription

Robert Johnston has asked me to charge Vince's department for 1/3 of the cost
of the annual subscription to IIF.  The annual cost is $47K.  Therefore the
cost for 1/3 is $15,666.67.  This information is for Maureen Raymond's use.

I will be happy to process the invoice for payment but in order for me to do
so, I will need the proper coding for Vince's department.

Please let me know if you are agreeable to this.  If you have questions, you
may wish to contact Robert Johnston directly at 3-9934.

Thanks,
Sharon
5-7212


The following is a brief summary of the results of yesterday's video
conference and this morning's follow-up session with Tim Hermann.  The
following prospects all possess some degree of market/financial opportunity
based upon input from the various commercial people present during the
meeting.

1.  Peoples' Mahomet into Trunkline at Manlove Delivery Prospect.
 Put gas into Trunkline for redelivery into higher priced Michigan markets.

2.  Alliance Take-Away into Peoples' system.
 Enhance Peoples' ability to take gas from Alliance into Peoples' 24" line
and redeliver into Border and/or Peoples high pressure Mahomet system.  Will
take compression and pipeline.

3.  Nicor Interconnect/Delivery from Peoples' system.
 Deliver gas from Peoples into Nicor to capture basis differential when
present.  Also connects these two large systems to make a more fluid market
center.

4.  Converting Midwestern Receipt into Mahomet into a bi-directional meter.
 Would allow deliveries of Peoples Mahomet gas into Midwestern Gas.
Attractive if Midwestern Gas reverses flows and starts flowing west to east.

5.  Midwest/Chicago Hub Compressor Station Project

There was also a plan to hold an "Alliance Impact" meeting in Houston perhaps
next week.  The purpose of this meeting is to bring together Enron's Houston
Midwest Commercial, Chicago/Peoples, and Canadian offices for an all day
session on Alliance Pipeline and its impact on the Midwest markets.  Laura
Luce is going to coordinate this meeting.

Chris Sonneborn is currently analyzing the operational feasibility of these
options and is scheduled to have preliminary results written up on August
18th.

Please contact me at X-58005 if you require additional information.

Thanks,
Bill Brogan