I just received this message from Kat!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
07:06 PM ---------------------------

Kat3422@aol.com on 11/21/2000 06:57:45 PM
To: Darlene.C.Forsyth@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Good News!

Hello sunshine.  How are things ?  I must say the Lord has really been
blessing me and my family.  Tell all the prayer warriors I said Thank you.
There's no way Thank you is enough. I cannot believe the out pour of help
that came my way.  My load has been lifted considerably, I have a smile on my
face.  Our God is an awesome God.  He reign's from Heaven about with power
and love, our God is an awesome God.  I have gotten so many card and letters
it is unbelievable.  I am so overwhelmed by all of this I can't help but to
cry.  When people don't even know you they come to your rescue. The Lord is
going to Bless each and every one of them richly.  Tell all of them I said I
love them with love of the Lord.  If there is anything I can ever do please,
please call on me.  The Lord is going to Bless me to be in a position one
day, I can help someone it is just a matter of time.  And for you Darlene - I
Love You.  You have always showed concern for me and my family, even when you
were having problems yourself.  I just Love You!!! May the Lord continue to
Bless you and your family abundantly. Can I send an e-mail to the saints, the
one I have their name?  Let me know.  Keep me on your prayer list I will be
going to the doctor, that always makes me a wreck.  Also, have you heard
anything about lil Michael?  I want to know how he is doing, I am so sure the
Lord pulled him though. Please let me know.  I will write again tomorrow, my
son just walked in I do not want my kids to know my situation, they do not
need stress, especially him.   I Love you all.

Be Blessed in Jesus Name.
Kat


I think we will have to see, but I think he will.

Pulp & Paper is now planning to have three traders in Singapore. More to come
on this after I speak with Julia.

Alan

	Mark E Haedicke
	03/05/2001 04:23 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Singapore Office LNG Support Activities

Does Matt have time to do all the LNG work?  My guess is that he may have the
time.  Mark

	Alan Aronowitz
	03/02/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Singapore Office LNG Support Activities

FYI. This will greatly impact Matt's workload and availability for potential
EBS activities. I would like to visit with you about this.

Regards, Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 02:26 PM -----

	Daniel R Rogers@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/02/2001 12:27 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Singapore Office LNG Support Activities

Alan,

As we discussed the other day, I'm forwarding my "work list" of projects
either currently or soon to be underway that will be led by V V Rao's team
out of Singapore (with support from Dubai and Houston):

1. Australia -- Northwest Shelf LNG "Wedge Quantities" bid.  Proposal for
mid-term, firm (but declining over time) LNG supply for merchant trading
activities prepared and being sent to NWS next week.  Preparation and
negotiations of SPA, transportation and marketing contracts to follow.

2. Australia -- Northwest Shelf LNG Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement --
draft prepared and being sent to counterparty next week.  Negotiations to
follow.

3. Indonesia -- PERTAMINA Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft prepared
and being sent to counterparty next week.  Negotiations to follow.

4. Japan -- Osaka Gas Co. Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft prepared
and sent to counterparty.  Expect responsive comments next week.
Negotiations to follow.

5. Malaysia/Spain -- LNG fuel supply for Enron's Arcos IPP in Spain --
initial term sheet under development.  Expect this one to heat up in the next
few months.

6. Malaysia -- Malaysia LNG Master Spot LNG Trading Agreement -- draft
prepared and will be sent to counterparty later in the month.  Negotiations
to follow.

7. Malaysia -- "Bintulu Hub" e-commerce venture with Malaysia LNG, Malaysia
Int'l. Trading Co., Enron LNG Marketing and Enron Networks -- under
development.  Legal needs will depend somewhat on final deal format.  Goal is
to be set up for LNG commodity and LNG transportation capacity e-trading
(possibly on a Deal Bench auction site platform) by year-end.  May expand to
cover crude oil commodity and transportation capacity trading as well
following recent meetings in London.

8. Japan -- LNG Receiving Terminal & gas and power marketing joint
development project with Enron LNG Marketing LLC, BHP and EnCom.  Initial
draft of joint development MOU prepared.  Negotiations to follow.

9. Korea -- KOGAS Winter Cargo Supply & Transportation Opportunities -- under
develoopment.  Various MOU drafts have been exchanged, but deal structure and
timing keep moving around.  Legal needs will ultimately depend somewhat on
final deal format.

10. Master LNG Vessel Transportation Capacity Access/Trading Agreements --
under early development, but should accelerate to match pace of no. 7 above.
Document will then be used to propose access to numerous other LNG vessel
owners/charterers who may wish to participate with Enron in making a market
for spare transportation capacity.  Initial draft underway in Houston, but
may be handed off to Singapore at some point.

As you can see, there's presently quite a lot of activity being undertaken
from Singapore.  Much of this has arisen since the beginning of this year.
Nancy and I have been involved in preparing initial drafts, providing
comments, etc. from Houston (and occasional fly-in appearances)  and V V
presently has on-the-ground legal support from an excellent Linklaters Team
based in Singapore.  Matt Lee has now circled with V V's team and is
undergoing both intensive commercial LNG training and intensive LNG trading
contract training.  I suspect that on average this year, we could easily use
70-100% of  Matt Lee's time (depending on how the above activities progress).

Kind regards,
Dan


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   July 13, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Media General, Inc.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange


Please see attached memo and INGAA papers.


In support of Enron,s continuing efforts to increase its return on invested
capital and direct resources towards our highest return businesses, David
Haug, Chairman and CEO of Enron CALME, Jim Hughes, President and COO of Enron
APACHI, Joe Kishkill, Managing Director of Enron South America, and Frank
Stabler, formerly a Managing Director of Enron CALME, will join Mark Metts in
a corporate wide effort, to help monetize some of Enron,s assets.  David will
help transition the CALME business activities into other parts of Enron while
working with Mark on the asset monetization projects.  David will continue as
an Executive Vice President for Enron Corp and a member of Enron,s Executive
Committee.  Cliff Baxter will oversee this effort.

Consistent with these changes, the CALME group will be divided as follows.
Enron Global LNG and Enron,s Caribbean Basin activities will become part of
the new Enron Global Markets (EGM) group headed by Mike McConnell.  Rick
Bergsieker, President/COO of LNG will continue in that role and in his dual
role as President/COO of Enron Middle East, which will also join EGM. Shawn
Cumberland, President and COO of the Caribbean Basin unit and his executive
team will carry out the transition process for the Caribbean business unit's
people and businesses as part of EGM.  Management of its Colombia and
Venezuela businesses will transfer to Enron South America and its LNG-related
activities to EGM as described above.

The EES related initiatives and people will be transferred to those units.
All of the various international businesses will participate as usual in the
upcoming budget process with their new alignment and continue to meet their
plan targets for 3rd and 4th quarters.

Concurrently, we are consolidating our trading and merchant activities in
Japan and Australia into Enron Europe.  Joe Hirl and Paul Quilkey will report
to Enron Europe,s Office of the Chairman.

We congratulate David Haug and Rebecca McDonald for proposing these
realignments, which we agree, will maximize both the financial and
intellectual capital in Enron.  Over the coming weeks, specific assignments
and reporting relationships will be determined and communicated.


Pls confirm that Andrea was promoted last year to Sr. Counsel...the system is
still showing her job title as Legal Counsel though for PRC review purposes
we were planning to review her as a Director.

Pls advise asap,
thanks.,
diana


Sally,

Thanks again for the positive feedback. Members of your team were
instrumental to the success -- specifically Jeff Sorensen, Bob Klein, Becky
Ford and Melissa White.  I'm talking with Beth about the possibility that we
might recognize key people on the team with some sort of 'project success'
bonus.

Below, I've attached an invitation to a meeting that we've scheduled for
Wednesday. We will present plans for 5 immediate projects that we're
proposing to address Unify issues. Let us know if you'd like to attend. Also,
please forward names of anyone that should attend that we've missed.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron on 06/15/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

Alarm enabled: an alarm will occur  on 06/21/2000 01:55 PM
	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

Unify System -- Problems and Proposed Immediate Projects
06/21/2000
02:00 PM - 04:00 PM

Detailed description:

We would like to invite you to a facilitated meeting to discuss the Unify
system -- key issues as well as proposed solutions.

We believe that we have an approach to immediately begin to address key
performance issues in the Unify system.
To be successful with the proposed projects, we need your input, sponsorship
and participation. Angie Lorio will find a location and will publish as soon
as possible.

The proposed agenda is as follows:

I. UNIFY --  Current State, Strengths, Issues
II. Conceptual Overview Of Proposed Solutions
Organization Building
Performance Monitoring Team
Sybase 12 Upgrade
SQL Server Testing
Middle Tier Rearchitecture Project
Scoping For A Re-Write Effort
III. Solutions Proposals / Plans For Immediate Review / Kickoff
Proposed Scope
Assumptions
High Timelines / Cost Estimates
Staffing
IV. Facilitated Discussion On Unify
Future Growth / Changes Required For Unify
New Project Prioritization

Invitations have been sent to: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regan M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, laray.odum@luminant.com, nadeem.abbasi@luminant.com, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Optional invitees: Chris Hanz/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Simmons/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angie Lorio
_________________________________________________________________________
This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).


I am attaching a preliminary Agenda for the meeting in Houston.  Please send
me suggested changes.

The intend is for Day 1 Jan 4 to get a business/commercial perspective, the
business unit leaders will be doing most of the talking, and at the end of
the day they may elect to leave. Day 2 the commercial support staff will
continue to work on specific issues and develop the assignement  list. Javier
Pantoja, and Guillermo Canovas need to stay.

Mike Smith.- Please coordinatte with Jane Wilson about the pre-identified
issue list  and the regulatory support staff (Southern Cone working Group)
we want to participate the following day. Please propose a  detailed agenda.

Jane Wilson. I need someone to take notes of the meeting and distribute them
to the participants.

Robert Neustaedter.- Please make the conference room reservation. I need an
overhead projector , easel paper and pens, masking tape.

Kelly and Jim Steffes. I need you to participate both days. I do not know
well enough the other members of the Sothern Cone working group. I do not
want to add others at this point in time because the obejective of these
sessions cannot be met with a large group. But review the agenda and suggest
if I need to add someone else.

Jose


Cynthia Corcoran
Attorney At Law
2939 Ferndale
Houston, TX  77098
www.corcoran-law.com
Phone:  713.857-0435

 - Cynthia Corcoran.vcf
 - 000612-000616final.doc


Attached is an article of how the CA power problem is effecting North
Carolina in its decision to regulate its power market.


There is no change from my previous approvals for the only counterparty on
the 3/30/00 list, so I am not sending that list.

On the list for 3/31/00, first, David Minns is in the Houston office today,
so I gave the response today for the one Australian counterparty on this
list.  We are meeting with Mark on Wednesday to try and figure out the
approval process for Australia, so maybe after Wednesday I'll start
responding for them.

Second, on this list please note that there are no counterparties that have
been indicated as credit derivative counterparties, so none of the
counterparties on this list should be approved to trade credit derivatives
(even though I haven't "X'ed" them out).


Feds Hint at Power Bill Refunds
Firms ordered to justify high rates
David Lazarus and Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Staff Writers
Saturday, March 10, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/10/M
N144141.DTL
Federal regulators warned power companies yesterday that they may have to
refund $69 million to California ratepayers for charging unreasonable prices
during recent electricity shortages.
However, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission left the door wide open for
the unnamed 13 generators to avoid refund payments if they could offer
"further justification" for why their rates should be considered fair.
Consumer activists were quick to note that the commission's order was
significant.
"They have acknowledged for the first time that there has been abuse of the
marketplace," said Doug Heller, assistant organizing director for the
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica. "It's an
acknowledgment that the power companies have been ripping us off."
However, consumer groups also pointed out that the order -- issued late in
the day -- was partly a political ploy intended to make the Bush
administration look more sympathetic to California's plight.
The proposed $69 million refund also represents only a fraction of the
billions of dollars that utilities have had to pay due to rising electricity
rates.
The commission set narrow parameters for power charges in January that may be
considered unreasonable. It is only considering charges above $273 per
megawatt hour during the series of Stage 3 energy emergencies that threatened
statewide blackouts.
William Massey, the lone commissioner who voted against the order, noted that
of 70,300 power transactions in January above $150 per megawatt hour, only
about 13,000 fall within the regulatory commission's parameters for potential
refunds.
"This order is arbitrary, capricious and unlawful," he said. "Eighty percent
of the transactions have been excluded from refunds."
But commission Chairman Curt Hebert characterized the order as an aggressive
effort to safeguard California consumers.
"Today's refund order demonstrates the commission's commitment to ensure
appropriate and reasonable prices in the wholesale electricity market given
the supply and demand imbalance in California," he said in a statement.
POWER COMPANIES NOT WORRIED
Gary Ackerman, executive director of the Western Power Trading Forum, an
energy-industry association in Menlo Park, said power companies are not
worried about the prospect of having to pay out millions of dollars in
refunds.
"The people I've talked to said they can justify the costs for a majority of
hours where FERC said there may have been overcharges," he said.
"We will be supplying supporting data to FERC," said Richard Wheatley, a
spokesman for Reliant Energy in Houston. "We commend them for doing this
review. We believe this can be resolved and we can all move on."
Jan Smutny-Jones, president of the Independent Energy Producers, a trade
group representing out-of-state generators, said the commission's order shows
that the system is working.
"In my opinion, what has been identified is talking about potential refunds,
" he said. "The generators will have a chance to justify their rates. I'm not
terribly troubled by that."
The California Independent System Operator, which oversees the state's power
grid, welcomed the order, although it said $69 million is lower than its own
estimates of potential overcharges.
The ISO had asked the commission earlier this month to review $350 million in
January power charges that exceeded the regulatory commission's "soft cap" of
$150 per megawatt hour.
A soft cap means the price can exceed the prescribed amount as long as a
supplier can justify the charge.
REFUND ORDERS ARE RARE
"The granting of refunds by FERC is not a common occurrence," said Charles
Robinson, the ISO's general counsel. "We're treading new ground."
Considering the potential ramifications of the order, the commission was
oddly furtive in issuing its press release at the very end of the business
week.
The commission's press office already was closed by the time of the
announcement, and the commissioners had left for the day.
Reached at his home, Massey acknowledged that the commission was all but
inviting power companies to bury the commission in paperwork to support their
wholesale rates.
"Welcome to the Hebert chairmanship," he said.
Hebert was appointed head of the commission last month by President Bush.
Since then, the regulatory commission and the Bush administration have
maintained a largely hands-off approach to California's energy crisis.
"We have said from the beginning that obviously the state of California has
to address these problems and these challenges," U.S. Energy Secretary
Spencer Abraham said this week.
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com and Lynda Gledhill at
lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Appeals court declines to order energy price caps

Updated: May 29, 2001 - 12:22 p.m.
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal appeals court declined Tuesday to order federal
energy regulators to cap wholesale electricity prices.

The decision by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
came hours before California Gov. Gray Davis was to urge President Bush in
Century City to cap wholesale power costs, which have been spiraling out of
control.

The panel, in a brief statement, said last week's appeal by state Senate
President John Burton and state Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg does not
warrant "intervention of this court."

The lawmakers, both Democrats, were joined by the city of Oakland in their
appeal to the 9th Circuit.

"The citizens of California are suffering immediate irreparable harm as a
result of FERC's abrogation of its duty to establish just and reasonable
rates for electricity," they wrote to the 9th Circuit, which has
jurisdiction over FERC.

The lawmakers said California's looming threat of continued blackouts "are
an imminent threat to the health, welfare and safety of every California
citizen."

The suit came after more than a year of wholesale power prices reaching
historically high levels. In December, prices in California reached $200 per
megawatt hour -- and they have skyrocketed to as much as $1,900 per megawatt
hour during peak times since then.

The Bush administration ardently opposes price caps and President Bush has
declined Davis' requests to urge FERC to impose strict caps.

Vice President Dick Cheney, chief architect of the administration's energy
plan, has said capping prices would not increase energy supplies or reduce
demand.

"We get politicians who want to go out and blame somebody and allege there
is some kind of conspiracy ... instead of dealing with the real issues,"
Cheney has said.

Cheney criticized Davis, a Democrat, for what he called a "harebrained
scheme" to use the state's budget surplus to buy power because California's
two largest utilities face enormous financial problems.

For the short term, the Bush administration has approved Davis' request to
expedite permits for new power plants and has ordered federal facilities in
California to reduce energy consumption 10 percent this summer.

Sacramento and the White House appear locked in a high-voltage war of
rhetoric over energy policies. There is broad bipartisan dissatisfaction in
Sacramento with Washington's response to California's energy crisis -- the
result of its own 1996 deregulation rules.

Last month FERC did order a one-year cap on electricity sold into California
during power emergencies, when power reserves fall below 7 1/2 percent. The
agency did not set a price and also required the state to join a regional
transmission organization, which could limit California's ability to control
its own power grid.

Davis called the plan a "Trojan horse," and state power regulators dismissed
the cap as inadequate, saying it would profit power generators at
ratepayers' expense.

In addition, Davis and state lawmakers sharply criticized FERC for
considering requiring the state's power grid operator to add a surcharge on
power sales to pay generators the money they are owed by the state's two
large financially strapped utilities.

The case is Burton v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 01-70812.

-- Associated Press

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005


Sorry I lost my temper.  I guess I'm not accustomed to being transferred to
someone else to get things done.  No reason to lose my temper, though.

Kay


yes you are.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Proctor, Shemin V.
Subject: RE: Dominion

ima dominion stud

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Proctor, Shemin V." <sproctor@akllp.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, March 18, 2002 5:06 PM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  Dominion

   You're right Chris; Dominion is charging .0721 for parking.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


[IMAGE]
Special Keynote Address  Commissioner Stan Wise  Georgia Public Service Commission[IMAGE]  "This is Georgia --- Not California!"  Learn how Georgia is successfully navigating the path to deregulation.		Conference Highlights Include:  Meet Customers, Not Venders  Power Generation  Price Volatility  Adequacy of Supply  Click here!  Save $50  Register Now! (Expires May 15)
		Corporate Sponsors: Aquila ~ Axia ~ Caminus ~ Columbia Gulf Transmission Dominion Transmission ~ Duke Energy Gas Transmission Enron North America Corp. ~ Mirant ~ Reliant Energy  Southern Natural Gas Company ~ Williams  For an agenda, a pre-listing of attendees or more information, visit our website at www.interchange-energy.com  (then click on the Atlanta Forum) or call Jerry Ribnick at 763-545-1515 or 800-427-3976  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *      The LDC Forum Series  Atlanta  June 4-5. 2001  Chicago    Sept. 10-12, 2001   Boston    April 18-19, 2002 Interchange Energy Group, 620 Mendelssohn Avenue North, Suite 161, Minneapolis, MN 55427 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * If you prefer to not receive future e-mails regarding The LDC Forums, please REPLY to this message and indicate REMOVE in the subject field.

 - 9915star.gif
 - stanwise501a.gif


Nick,

Sorry for the delay in my reply.   August the 21st will work the best, since
Jim Fallon (head trader for bandwidth) will be out the following week.   We
will set up a meeting with him.   Kevin Hannon is out, however, and there is
no need for you to stay for dinner if you prefer to head back earlier in the
afternoon.

Should you want help in making any travel arrangements,  our assistant
Shirley Crenshaw (713 853 5290) would be happy to help you.

thanks and look forward to your visit,

Stinson


On interconnection, I think our approach has been that the ISO should be the
party you have an interconnection contract with, not the utility.

James D Steffes@EES
09/06/2000 05:29 AM
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES, jdasovic, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES, tim belden
Subject: Re: California "Fact Sheet"

Sarah --

Looks fine.  Did Craig Roach contribute?

I wonder if we should highlight the Interconnection problems we are having
with new generation?  I know that most of the delays are Siting related, but
it is unclear to me if the ISO or the local utility is the right point of
contact.  This would help us nationally and gives FERC an "answer" - enforce
your Interconnection policies!!

Also, this doesn't mention any possible market flaws.  Do we think that some
exist?  Are any of the AS markets manipulated?  EPSA needs to make sure that
it takes an honest approach to this situation or its credibility will be
destroyed.  Has Craig Roach looked into this?

Jim

Sarah Novosel@ENRON
09/05/2000 02:39 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: California "Fact Sheet"

Here is EPSA's "Fact Sheet" on California.  We're discussing it at the EPSA
power marketers' weekly conference call tomorrow.  We're also considering
having EPSA submit this Fact Sheet to the CPUC  in response to the data
requests sent by the CPUC (responses are due on Friday).  If you have any
comments or suggested changes, please let me know (as soon as possible) in
case EPSA submits this paper to the CPUC.

Thanks

Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 09/05/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org> on 08/30/2000 01:20:16 PM
To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: California "Fact Sheet"

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketing Working Group

FROM: Donald Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy

DATE: August 30, 2000

RE: California "Fact Sheet"

At our meetings last week with FERC, we had a great deal of valuable factual
information and policy suggestions, but they were not pulled together as a
cohesive story.  Based on materials provided by various companies, we have
drafted the attached fact sheet entitled "California: The Real Story."  It is
an effort to pull together the most compelling pieces of information and
policy arguments as a "leave-behind" for FERC staff and other regulators and
to form the basis for any testimony at the upcoming congressional hearings.

The paper includes factual information pulled from a number of sources and
Jackie Gallagher, EPSA's Research Assistant, is attempting to verify and cite
as many facts as possible.  To make the message convincing, we need "chapter
and verse" on our facts.  Please review the material carefully to be sure it
is accurate and compelling.  Any assistance in verifying these facts, or
providing others that do a better job of telling our story, will be
appreciated.  You can e-mail to Jackie at jgallagher@epsa.org.

We will discuss the paper during our conference call next Wednesday,
September 6 at 11:00 a.m. (EDT).  To access the call, dial 1-800-937-6563 and
ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call.  If you have any questions or suggestions
before Wednesday, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200.

Attachment

Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC  20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
jgallagher@epsa.org

 - CALIFORNIA2.doc


Attached is "PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S REAL-TIME PRICING PROPOSAL, SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDERING PARAGRAPH 3 OF DECISION 01-08-021", which was filed with the CPUC on Friday, August 17, 2001 and was served by placing it for collection and mailing to:  All Parties of Record In A.00-11-038, et al.

Patricia Kokason
3-6668


We may also want language that limits the "rate shock" of this type of
activity to EES' customers?

Janel, can you add to Monday's call agenda.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/17/2001 11:47 AM -----

	Leslie Lawner
	03/13/2001 10:32 AM

		 To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, sgovenar@govadv.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AB 25

AB 25 creates the Electric Rate Stabilization Auhtority which can arrange
financing for the utilities' overpayment debt which is defined as the
liabilities incurred between 6/1/00 and 3/31/01 through purchases of
electricity from generators or other providers other than themselves, parent
companies, affiliates,or subdivisions, for which ratepayer revenues were
insufficient to pay.  This is one of those bills where your eyes glaze over,
but I think the one area where we may have an issue, or desire clarification,
is Article 5, PUC ratesetting.  The bill says that the PUC shall fix rates
for the 3 utilities that provide them with sufficient revenues to pay the
amounts assessed (by the Stabilization folks).  I think we would like
language exempting direct access customers from these assessments in the bill
itself.


I haven't totaled everything up yet but it is $125 plus $5 for free agents
(which it sounds like you had none) plus you get $30 $20 $10 for 1st 2nd 3rd
place weekly finish respectively

Tori Kuykendall
12/12/2000 11:17 AM
To: Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: fantasy football

hey martin - i know i havent paid for the fantasy league at all - but i am
trying to figure out how much i owe - i think 3 of my transactions shouldve
been free because 1 was to change kickers on the same team and 2 were to
change my defense on the bye week - so, without any winnings - i think i owe
$145 - can you verify?  thanks.  also - can you tell me if i won anything for
making the semi-finals?


Start Date: 1/30/02; DayAhead market;  DayAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.


Saturday, March 3, the redeliveries into HPL from Fuels Cotton Valley for
the Eastrans deal will increase to approximately 19500 MMBtu/dy.  This
change should continue through March 5th or 6th.  The reason for the change
is an operational emergency.  DEFS typically delivers approximately 12200
MMBtu/dy into TXU Lone Star.  This delivery will not be able to occur
because the Alford B compressor needs to get into the shop for maintenance.
This compressor will be out of commission for the month of March.  The
Busby compressor will compress the usual 7300 MMBtu/dy of Fuels Cotton
Valley redelivery gas as well as the 12200 MMBtu/dy of TXU Lone Star
redelivery gas.  A different redelivery point with TXU Lone Star is being
established and should be available by March 5th or 6th.  At this point in
time, we will take the HPL Fuels Cotton Valley redelivery gas to zero and
balance the redeliveries between the two points.  Therefore, DEFS will not
change the delivery or redelivery nominations in place for Eastrans.  After
the new TXU Lone Star redelivery point is put into place and the points are
volume balanced, it is our intent to have redeliveries of 7300 MMBtu/dy
from Fuels Cotton Valley and 22700 MMBtu/dy into PG&E (which is what is in
place effective 3/1/01) for Eastrans.


Just thought I'd let you know I had several people drop by my office today.  They all said they heard you had found a new opportunity and would be leaving us in the near future.

Normally I dispel the rumor and move on, but this came from so many different individuals I wanted you to be aware of the hallway discussion.

I enjoy our working relationship, so selfishly I hope this rumor isn't merited...


Christie,

Greg has a conf. on his calendar during the period of May 9.  Let me check
w/him to see if he really plans on attending the conf.

Liz

From: Christie Patrick on 03/19/2001 02:20 PM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Executive Program - March 21- Greg Whalley

hi Greg!

Stanford is not giving up on your participating in a speaking engagement.  As
set forth below, how about MAY 9th??

Thanks!

--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 02:19 PM -----

	"Haim Mendelson" <haimmendelson@home.com>
	03/16/2001 12:03 AM
	Please respond to "Haim Mendelson"

		 To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Executive Program - March 21- Greg Whalley

Christie,

Thanks.  How about May 9? We can probably do May 8 or 10, but May 9 looks
best.

Thanks

Haim

*********************************************************************
Haim Mendelson
The General Atlantic Partners Professor of Electronic Business and Commerce,
and Management
Co-Director, Center for Electronic Business and Commerce
Director, E-Commerce Executive Programs
Co-Director, Strategic Uses of Information Technology
Stanford Business School
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
Phone: (650) 725-8927
Fax: (650) 725-7979
Email: haim@stanford.edu
http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/cebc/
*********************************************************************


Leslie:
Here is the last e-mail that I sent to Talisman's counsel.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/10/00 02:28 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	07/05/00 04:13 PM

		 To: "Love, Anne" <ALove@talisman-energy.com>@ENRON
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: revised Enron Online

Ann:
I will do that.  Just to clarify, he will need to sign off on all of the
changes, which I hope I can walk him through.  The only language that I am
concerned about is what I have marked as "under review".  I will copy you on
what i send to him as I will edit your draft to make my changes.  I will be
leaving to go on maternity leave shortly (probably no later than July 14th)
and if for some reason we don't conclude this, Mark Taylor will handle
(713-853-7459)

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Love, Anne" <ALove@talisman-energy.com>
	07/05/2000 03:54 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: revised Enron Online

Carol, please go ahead and have the 'under review' sections of the draft
read by the Enron Online person for approval, as the remaining comments are
not contentious.
I will send the mark-up to Marketing to see while we await for your reply.

Thank you
Anne Love

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: July 5, 2000 10:59 AM
To: Love, Anne
Subject: Re: revised Enron Online

Ann:
I am faxing to you my remaining comments which I hope we can resolve before
I run this by the Enron Online person for approval.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

                    "Love, Anne"

                    <ALove@talisman-e        To:     "'Carol St Clair'"
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
                    nergy.com>               cc:     "Paszkiewicz, Ed"
<EPaszkiewicz@talisman-energy.com>, "Sloan,
                                             Jim"
<JSloan@talisman-energy.com>
                    06/29/2000 11:46         Subject:     revised Enron
Online
                    AM

Carol, attached is the agreement with the changes you requested and my
suggested wording to Section 4. I trust I picked up your changes correctly,
as they were not too clear on the fax.

Except for two small changes in 4,(adding the word "on" in line 12, and
changing "confirmed" to "executed" in the last line) I did not make the
changes you faxed on 2(g) or 4 as we require some language to carve out of
those limitaions the information we use for our offer. Please see what I
suggested instead of the wording sent last time.

Trust this will be acceptable and we can attach this to a letter agreement
stating this is the ETA. This will also have to be referenced in the
Password Agreement

 <<Electronic Trading Agreement4 blk 3.doc>>  <<Electronic Trading
Agreement4.doc>>

Regards,
Anne Love
Phone  403-237-1623
FAX     403-231-2871

(See attached file: Electronic Trading Agreement4 blk 3.doc)
(See attached file: Electronic Trading Agreement4.doc)


Please disregard previous message re location of North Canton.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 03:20 PM -----

	Debra Perlingiere
	10/17/2000 03:13 PM

		 To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Contract for Gatherco, Inc.

Which state is North Canton located in?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Here is the information I sent to Karen Buckley on Kevin's preferences for the new analyst and associates starting in August.  Kevin's group has also identified several summer interns that they would be interested in as well.  I will forward the names of those indiduals to you as soon as possible.  Karen, please provide Louise and John with copies of the resumes Kevin's group selected for the summer interns.  Please feel free to contact me should you have additional questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melodick, Kim
Sent:	Monday, April  23, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	analyst and associate picks for Presto

Here is the rank ordering of Presto 's  August AA picks:

Top 6

D. Dupre
M Taylor
W. IZ
S. Pan
A. Ahmed
E. Anderson

7-11

Z. Costello
A. Day
G. Giron
M. Marquez
S. Dicke

12-21

W. Freije
W. Gurrola
S. Hermani
D. Jenkins
T. Lindvall
T. Lowell
M. Philippov
R. Williams
S. Yaman
J. Young


Hi Kate,
 I gave your work number to Rick North from the Northwest Earth Institute.
 We just finished an eight week discussion group in my office on "Choices
for Sustainable Living" and it was very interesting, eye opening. Thought
that with all you are learning about energy, you and some of your more
environmentally oriented co-workers might be interested in such a
discussion group.  I told him you would be changing jobs soon, and may not
have time to get anything started.  He suggested that you may know someone
else in your office who could help.  It's really quite important, this
business of sustainability.  I hope you can look into it.  Mom.


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- THURSDAY, DECEMBER 27, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=189
------------------------------------------------------------


Mark--As we discussed this morning, I have revised the legal risk memo for
the Fountain Valley Power development to address the issue of the mismatch in
dates for the respective parties to exercise their termination rights.  I
have done this in a new paragraph "2" to the legal risk memo, attached.


This was entered before we had the option in EnPower to enter deals under
California Energy Resource Schedulers - CERS. It's been changed.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/07/2001 06:57 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: # 509638

Did you find out anything about this deal?  We really need to get this out of
the NEW Counterparty status.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 08:59
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/06/2001 08:42 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: # 509638

This deal was entered as New Counterparty which is fine for a short period of
time.  However, within a few days someone needs to make sure to change the
deal to the correct counterparty name.  Can you look into this and let me
know?

Thanks!


Attached is a clean and redlined copy.  Mark,  Please note Russell Diamond
with credit wants to initial these contracts before credit will approve the
transaction from ENA's side.  I will send him the latest drafts.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Green, Michael" <michael.green@bridgeline.net>
To: "randall.curry@bhlp.com" <'randall.curry@bhlp.com'>;
"hugh.h.connett@bhlp.com" <'hugh.h.connett@bhlp.com'>;
"gregory.schockling@bhlp.com" <'gregory.schockling@bhlp.com'>;
"ragan.bond@bhlp.com" <'ragan.bond@bhlp.com'>; "McIlvoy, Karen D."
<Karen.D.McIlvoy@bridgeline.net>; "Knoblauh, Jay"
<Jay.Knoblauh@bridgeline.net>; "Green, Michael"
<michael.green@bridgeline.net>; "gschocklin@aol.com" <'gschocklin@aol.com'>;
"Wilkinson, Doug" <Doug.Wilkinson@bridgeline.net>; <tiffany.smith@bhlp.com>;
<jeff.stephens@bhlp.com>; <jstep103@aol.com>; "Wilson, Shona"
<Shona.Wilson@ENRON.com>; <maedajr@texaco.com>; <faulkjb@texaco.com>;
"Trevino, Susan" <Susan.D.Trevino@ENRON.com>; "Mihalik, Trevor"
<Trevor.Mihalik@bridgeline.net>; "Hagelmann, Bjorn"
<Bjorn.Hagelmann@ENRON.com>; "McConnell, Mike" <Mike.McConnell@ENRON.com>;
"Sharp, Greg" <Greg.Sharp@ENRON.com>; "Abel, Chris" <Chris.Abel@ENRON.com>;
<jparks1@houston.rr.com>; "Knoblauh, Jay" <Jay.Knoblauh@bridgeline.net>;
"Jenkins, Beth" <Beth.Jenkins@ENRON.com>; "Thompkins, Jason"
<Jason.Thompkins@ENRON.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:43 PM
Subject: Bridgeline Gas Marketing 4/18/2002

<<DPR 0418.xls>>  <<BGM 0418 ngpl.xls>>

************************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. and/or its relevant
affiliate(s) and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between
Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
************************************************************************


how many meetings do I have today at 3pm

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           10/03/2000 04:49 PM

To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LNG

Please plan to attend meeting to discuss LNG on Wednesday, October 4, 2000,
3:00. EB 3271  If you have any questions, please call Kimberly x 35193.

Many Thanks

Kimberly


We have struck common commercial ground with Bloomberg after all these months, however, there is still a technical obstacle.  This meeting's objective is to introduce our QDF and let them know what they have to build to.

Due to resource constraints this is not a deal we would consider until later in the year IF it requires additional development.  For now, your assistance in "selling" the QDF architecture would be valuable.

Is there anyone else you would include?


Kate, amerex said cp should be Coral Power instead of El Paso

, THANKS


I'm looking at last night's New Deal report.  I see deal 425325 with a loss
of $236,000, but I don't see deal 425332 with a big positive number
anywhere.  Any ideas?


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Coal Trading
The liquidity in trading of the Standard European Coal Agreement has
increased significantly over the last 6 weeks.  Many counterparties that
previously opted to stay on the sidelines finally chose to join the game.
Since the contract's inception at the beginning of the year, Enron has traded
a total of 5.3 million tons against the SECA contract, of which 3.8 million
tons has been traded via EnronOnline since July 2000.  We are 5.3 million
tons of a total traded market of 5.8 million tons.

Principal Investments
Tridium Inc., the leading provider of Internet-based automation
infrastructure solutions, announced the close of a $20 million round of
capital funding. The funds will be used to increase Tridium,s sales and
technical support offices in North America, expand its operations into Europe
and Asia, and enhance its technology and products. kRoad Ventures, L.P. and
Enron North America each contributed $10 million in venture capital.

Corporate Development
Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny
Energy, Inc., announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which
Allegheny Energy Supply will purchase three Enron natural gas-fired merchant
generating facilities. The acquisition is expected to close in the 2nd
quarter of 2001.

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

The deadline to provide feedback is Friday, November 17.  If you have been
selected to provide feedback on one of your fellow employees, please take the
time to fill out an evaluation online at www.pep.enron.com.

IN THE NEWS

"Enron Corp., already North America's biggest, buyer and seller of natural
gas and electric power is dead serious about its efforts to capture a big
slice of the $400 billion global trade in pulp, paper and lumber."
-Reuters News Service

2000 CHAIRMAN,S AWARD NOMINEES
Please join us in congratulating the ENA/EIM/EGM/ employees who have been
recognized as Chairman,s award nominees.

Congratulations to:

 Irma Alvarez  Alan Aronowitz  Rick Bergseiker  Carol Coats  Joya Davis
Rufino Durante
 Sue Foust  Julie Gomez  Barbara Gray  Jackie Griffith  John Harrison  Gerri
Irvine
 Kathy Benedict  Michael Kelley  Mike McConnell  Dave Nommensen Ina Norman
Juan Padron
 Veronica Parra  Michael Roberts  Rhonda Robinson Kevin Sweeney  Helen
Taylor  Stacey White

Extra kudos to BARBARA GRAY, who is a finalist for the 2000 Chairman,s
Award.  Barbara and ten other individuals are flying to San Antonio from
around the world to be honored at Enron,s annual Management Conference.  One
of these finalists will be recognized as the 2000 Chairman,s Award winner.

WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Anil Chandy, Alejandra Chavez
EGM ) Marty Cates, JoAnne Underwood, Brad Miller

Transfers to ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Mark Wadlington, Jennifer Blay-Smith, Georgian Landau, Kathryn Bussell,
John Coleman, Steven Gillespie, Clarissa Garcia, Ina Rangel, Farouk Lalji,
Eva Rainer, Chuchu Wang, Smith Day
EGM ) Gloria Solis, Carmella Jones, Nancy Haralson

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed outside of Enron.


No problem.  Just wanted to throw some thoughts into the hopper. If you've
gotten them from Vicky and Tom, then we're set.  Good luck.
Best,
Jeff


eSource presents Piranha Web training

Piranha Web offers an online connection to complete company analysis via
content that includes Disclosure, Worldscope, Datastream and I/B/E/S.  The
product is designed to allow users to get complete company fundamental
financials, earnings estimates, and market data.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Basic ticker query building

Attend our Piranha Clinic:

May 11 -    9:00 -10:00 AM  EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/30/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
1/30/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
1/30/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 162,703.
1/30/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 253,554.
1/30/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 365,246.


Who has the E-schedules for co. 1n2 and 272?  Marnie is looking for them and
the aren't in the file cabinet.  Call me and I'll take them to her.

Thanks.

Dana


FYI and also I will get back with you within a week.
   Mansoor
---------------------- Forwarded by Mansoor Abdmoulaie/ET&S/Enron on 05/16/2001 03:27 PM ---------------------------
From:	Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate on 05/16/2001 01:40 PM
To:	Mansoor Abdmoulaie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	TW/ Questar interconnects in two locations

Mansoor,
Eric Gadd's group is now looking at Questar Southern Trails as a possible acquisition/investment project.  For purposes of project consistency, please coordinate your project activities on Southern Trails with Kevin Hyatt.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:17 PM
To:	Fawcett, Jeffery
Cc:	Gottsponer, Morgan; Alters, Dennis; Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	TW/ Questar interconnects in two locations

	Jeff
	Just to inform that  the above project has been assign to me and I will provide you with a scope and the associated costs of the project in a week.
	Mansoor


As we have referenced in our monthly report,  Enron is involved in a dispute
with Mr. Friedman concerning his involvement in a proposed natural gas
transportation and marketing arrangement in the Republics of Mozambique and
South Africa (the "Pande Project").   Mark Wawro at Susman Godfrey has been
representing Enron Southern Africa Development and Enron Oil and Gas
Mozambique in negotiations with the Friedmans' lawyer, Jim Reed, at Looper
Reed.
  On January 16, 2001, the above referenced lawsuit was filed despite the
fact that the parties had recently met to discuss their respective positions
and had agreed to exchange documents. The lawsuit was filed in the 133rd
Judicial District Court of Harris County and, therefore, is pending before
Judge Lamar McCorkle.  The defendants have not been served and the
plaintiffs' lawyer has asked Mr. Wawro to accept service on their behalf.
 The plaintiffs allege that the defendants  breached the subject consulting
agreement by "failing to honor and denying any intention to honor, their
Development Fee and Investment Right obligations under the Consulting
Agreement". More specifically, plaintiffs seem to be complaining about a
failure of the defendants to pay a percentage of the $30 million allegedly
received in connection with  the transfer of defendants' interest in the
Pande Project and termination of the plaintiffs' consulting agreement  The
plaintiffs have also demanded an accounting as well as pre and post judgment
interest.  A specific dollar amount of the damages sought was not provided.
 Please call me if you have any additional questions about this matter.


Ted,

Thanks for kind words.

I have a favor to ask. Jason Sokolov who works with us part-time (he is a Rice
MBA candidate) has been accepted as a summer intern. I suggested that he ask
for
a position with your group for this summer. He works currently with Mike
Roberts,
4 hours a day.

Jason is a very bright and hard working person and I can recommend him
without reservations.

Vince

From:  Ted Murphy
03/24/2000 03:43 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vincent
Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Moody's Upgrade

To the great and powerful Research Group:

As you may know, Moody's has recently upgraded Enron from Baa2 to Baa1.
We had been on watch for an upgrade for a while and after their intitial
credit meeting, they still had questions primarily related to our control of
market and credit risk.  To that end, Jeff McMahon and Tim Despain had Rick
Buy, Bill Bradford and I meet with eight members of the Moody's team.  The
questions centered around policy and procedure in the Wholesale businesses.
We discussed VAR, stress testing and potential credit exposure.  To make a
long story short, subsequent to that meeting, they reconvened their committee
and announced the upgrade.

I want you to know how critical your contribution was to the discussion and
will continue to be as the bar gets raised.  I am sure that next year they
will continue to be concerned with our risk management capabilities as well
as extensions of our current platform - tail risk, intra day risk,
operational risk, and enterprise wide risk.

Thank you for your efforts in supporting RAC - it has tangible benefits.

Ted

p.s. - there is still lots of interesting opportunities to extend the paradigm


I agree with David- we should work these issues into our discussion w/ Luntz
on Friday. I think Haug captured the issues we have to grapple with better
than we've been able to thus far.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/16/2000
02:22 AM ---------------------------

David Haug@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/14/2000 10:23 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Executive Committee@EES, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON@EES, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron@EES, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Talking Points re "reregulation" in California

Steve, thanks for the helpful materials. However, if the experience in
overseas deregulating electricity markets where price increases and spikes
have occurred is any precedent, we will need to have some more down-to-earth
responses to a some of the potentially inflammatory issues facing the
politicians:
    1. When the prices spike, who reaps the windfall? Who sells that most
expensive 1% of the kwh? Is it a careful planner or a lucky speculator or
market manipulator? Someone is making a bunch of money off the screwed up
system. Who is it, and why is that OK?
    2. We do not allow people to inflate water prices to consumers in times
of drought, or food prices in times of hurricanes or floods. Even gasoline
price increases in periods of high demand are within 20%-30% of the base, not
2,5,10 or 100 times the average like spot electric prices. The issue isn't
whether the system is broken or not or how bad partial regulation is or how
much demand has increased versus supply. Thes will be seen as "ivory tower"
discussions. The populist political issue is, until the problem is fixed, why
should some shrewd big electric company or middleman be allowed to profit off
the misfortune of consumers who did not cause the problem? Why should anyone
be allowed to profiteer by selling at multiples above their generation cost?
    3. The hedges, fixed price contracts and other de facto insurance against
volatility that Enron or others offer could be seen as a symptom of the
problem rather than the solution.  Enron could be seen as at best a band aid
and at worst an opportunist made possible only by a broken system - - -sort
of like the guys who ran the old style protection rackets, or Colombian
"security consultants" who "guard " pipelines from the threats their guerilla
afiliates create, or  political risk insurance that you shouldn't really need
if the host country wasn't so screwed up. Don't worry about high crime in
your neighborhood -  - - just hire an off-duty policeman.   Who needed these
new electricity risk management products in the old days before deregulation?

    We have to be able to answer these types of questions at the level of the
ordinary citizen, not merely have the correct long-term competitive market
solution, or the forces of ignorance and re-regulation will gain momentum.
Are we sure we shouldn't back a temporary peak hour price cap  until the
regulatory problems we're all familiar with are worked out, to avoid a much
worse long term rollback?. - - -DLH

Steven J Kean@EES
08/14/2000 05:42 PM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker@EES
To: Executive Committee
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Talking Points re "reregulation" in California

As I promised this morning at the executive committee meeting, below are some
talking points for your use.

Overall message:  the market is working, regulation is not.

In California, peak demand rose by 10% over the last 4 years while new
capacity grew by only 2%.  But, as you would expect, the market responded by
proposing 8,000MW of new generation - - more than enough to offset the peak
demand growth.  The regulatory process, at both the state and local level,
has failed to site this new generation.  The problem is regulation, not
deregulation.

When San Diego customers began experiencing the effects of higher prices,
Enron responded with a fixed price which would have shielded San Diego
customers from price volatility and provided prices below their current
summer levels (Enron's price was about $55/MWH).  After publication of
Enron's offer, nine other companies made offers.  Again, the market responded
where regulation failed.  San Diego has not accepted any of these offers
because of regulatory/legislative restrictions on its ability to buy outside
of the PX (i.e. the spot market).

In markets where siting is easier, suppliers have moved to build additional
generation.  Enron built 3 plants in response to the 1998 price spikes.
Those plants were planned, sited and built in less that 12 months - - in time
for the summer of 1999.  Where regulatory hurdles are lower, the market
responds.

The solution to current pricing and reliability issues is more competition
not reregulation.  Policy makers should:

Open the transmission grid so that power can get from where it is to where it
is needed.

Expedite interconnection of new generation.

Expedite siting of new facilities.

Give customers a choice, so that they have better access to demand side
solutions.

Also attached is a more detailed discussion of California, prepared by Jeff
Dasovich of our San Francisco office.


>From: "stanley czajkowski" <sjplus5@hotmail.com>
>To: BJLord2@aol.com, cahemming@hotmail.com, cardiac734@aol.com,
>cardiactech@adelphia.net, cmarsh3892@aol.com, comet91000@worldnet.att.net,
>cwalker@borg.com, dwestwood@erols.com, emsequalnolife@aol.com,
>found@monumental.com, haasdc@borg.com, haasmb@netscape.net,
>jons_stang@yahoo.com, jwalsh@medicorpihn.com, katwilliams@juno.com,
>kesterl@hoffman.army.mil, kidd108@attbi.com, ladybee108@webtv.net,
>Larry.Gordon@usmc-mccs.org, maniac_8@hotmail.com, okfine66@aol.com,
>pd4byot@aol.com, pita651@aol.com, ralph.walters@gsa.gov, s-t-a-k@msn.com,
>shedrick@erols.com, tina_leavy@msn.com, welsh@ibb.gov, Wollimat1@cs.com
>Subject: Fwd: Fw: Her Hero!
>Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 16:09:04 -0500
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Ron Davies" <rdavies@twcny.rr.com>
>>To: "Walt Hanson" <dwh3@hotmail.com>,   "BARBARA JOHNSON"
>><bears4barb@hotmail.com>,   "Barbara Fenner" <afenner1@twcny.rr.com>,
>>"Stanley Czajikowski" <sjplus5@hotmail.com>
>>Subject: Fw: Her Hero!
>>Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:59:43 -0500
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Her Hero!
>>
>>The fireman had rushed into a burning building and
>>rescued a beautiful
>>young lady who was clad only in the top half of her
>>baby-doll nightgown.
>>
>>Then the fireman had carried her in his arms down
>>three flights of stairs.
>>
>>As they arrived safely outside the building, she
>>looked at him with great
>>admiration and said, "Oh, you are wonderful.  It must
>>have taken great
>>strength and courage to rescue me the way you did."
>>
>>"Yes it did," the fireman admitted. "I had to fight off three
>>other
>>firemen who were trying to get to you."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


I look forward to an evening of intense concentration puncuated by controlling, berating direction.
And that's just Beth's backseat driving on the way to Greenway.
Hey-oh!
But seriously, folks, I'm probably not in for any game night where Travis is encouraging guys to feel his lance.
Isn't there enough posturing?
J

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Soleja, Sameer" <Sameer.Soleja@enform.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Cherry, Michael; Sample, Matt; Dunn, John; Gradney, Kevin; Cherry, Beth; Wolfe, Jason; Elliott, Allan
Subject:	RE: Radar Locked.

This is almost scary...
but not as SCARY AS....as....well, crap.
Sameer
-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Michael
To: Sample, Matt; Dunn, John; Gradney, Kevin; Cherry, Beth; '''''Jason.Wolfe@enron.com' ' ' ' '; Elliott, Allan
Cc: Soleja, Sameer
Sent: 11/1/2001 10:07 AM
Subject: Radar Locked.
MillerKnight has a new target? Maverick?!? The Top Gun?
You shall feel the sharpness of my lance.
Just not tomorrow night.
T


I got back form Germany on Friday and have been trying to catch up with work
before our trip to Alaska.  We leave this Sunday the 10th.  Monique's
brother is going to watch the dogs while we're gone so don't worry about it.
It sounds like you've got your hands full.

It's great you're buying a house.  We just can't seem to figure out what we
want to do.  Monique is so stressed out with work right now I'm not sure how
much longer we'll be in Houston.

Did you get a good loan?  Did you get your truck yet?

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie_Menconi@countrywide.com [mailto:Julie_Menconi@countrywide.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:52 AM
To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
Subject: RE: Hi!

Hi Worm,

How's it going?  I haven't heard from you in awhile!!
What are the dates you are going to Alaska?
Did Mom tell you I am buying a house?
Well, I am.   And it is stressing me out!!!!!
I have two offers on the table right now.
Both of the houses are cute.  I just can't decide which one
I like better.  You need to come visit soon.  Hopefully,
I will be moved in when you bring Jake and Pearl up.
How is Mo?  How is work?  How are the dogs?
Let me know.
Love,
Jul


Please send me an e-mail today with your impressions of this candidate so
that I can report back to HR.  Thanks.
Carol


Colleen/Chris:  I'm working from memory here, but I'm pretty sure that the
new Order 637 reporting requirements require the Index of Customers to list
the primary receipt and delivery points.  However, in checking the FERC web
site, the pipelines are only required to update the Index of Customers
quarterly.  Therefore, the indices filed under the new reporting requirements
won't be out until early October.  I will look into this more closely when I
get back.

Chris -- Is your Penn Fuel release on Transco or Tennessee?  I couldn't find
"Penn Fuel" on either the Transco or Tennessee Index of Customers as of
7/1/00.  Do they have another "legal" name?

P.S.  Here in western North Carolina, the high today was about 70 degrees.
It's sure going to be rough coming back to 100.  But I understand y'all will
have a cool spell tomorrow.  It's supposed to be way down to 92!!  We'll be
warming up to about 72.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           09/06/2000 08:30 AM

To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transco capacity issue

Becky--please read Chris' e-mail below.  I have not talked with him yet about
it (I just got the message), but I'll get with him and then we can discuss
this further.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
08:28 AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/05/2000 12:16 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Transco capacity issue

With the change in segmentation rules on Transco, it has become much more
critical to know the primary receipt and delivery points for the capacity we
are buying.  Mr. Goodell said that Tennessee's EBB will indicate if the
points on the capacity you are buying are secondary or primary.  I would
prefer to know the actual primary points on the contract, especially the
delivery points.

I just bought some Z6-Z6 capacity from Penn Fuel for the balance of the
month.  Steve Gillespie verified that Penn Fuel released the primary receipt
and delivery point on the contract.  But, I'm taking Penn Fuel's word for it
and I am unable to verify the information myself.  It could have a big impact
on what we flow in Z6.

Colleen, can we do anything about this through the regulatory process?  Let
me know if you need specific capacity examples.


This is SERC's response to NERC's Task Force letter.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 11/30/99
09:31 AM ---------------------------

Joe Hartsoe@ENRON
11/30/99 08:09 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 11/30/99 09:13
AM ---------------------------

Dave Mangskau
11/29/99 05:39 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force

Joe & Dick:
Perhaps you have already received a copy of
this???
---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron on 11/29/99
03:53 PM ---------------------------

"William F Reinke" <wreinke@duke-energy.com> on 11/29/99 03:02:40 PM
To: garfield@firstenergycorp.com, dbevelhymer@tnsk.com, paul_evanson@fpl.com,
pete.landrieu@pseg.com, bharbour@soyland.com, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
cdurkin@npcc.org, bzemanek@csw.com, jdavis06@apsc.com
cc: jmaughn@serc1.org

Subject: NERC Policy Interpretation Task Force

TO:  Regional Chairmen

Gentlemen:
     The attachment contains a letter from SERC to the NERC Chairman and the
Chairman of the Policy Interpretation Task Force, with a copy to the NERC
President, on the matter of the TVA/Enron dispute.  I wanted you to be aware
of
this communication.  I also want to be sure that you understand that our
concerns deal solely with reliability and due process issues.  Please advise
if
you have questions concerning this matter.

Sincerely,

William F Reinke
SERC Chairman

(See attached file: Serc Ltr to Neale and Hawks Nov 29.doc)

 - Serc Ltr to Neale and Hawks Nov 29.doc


Start Date: 3/31/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033102.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:   4.00 / Final:   3.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/31/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE


An outstanding year!

2000, of course. It was extraordinary, by any measure.

How many years can you name that start with a great hoax -- Y2K -- and end
with a monumental hoot -- the world's greatest democracy can't get the hang
of how to elect a President?

We're not the only mad conspiratorialist to divine that the Y2K scare was the
brilliant handiwork of a cabal of top computer makers intent on sparking
sales -- and what a wildly successful scheme it was.

Few, however, are privy to the knowledge that the massive snafu of election
2000 was no improbable statistical fluke but the Machiavellian contrivance of
Ross Perot exacting revenge for being denied his usual place on the ballot.
Besides, it finally occurred to Ross that he wasn't going to be President,
and that made him as mad as a plucked rooster: If he wasn't going to be
President, by gum, nobody was going to be President!

Even though election 2000 demonstrated a small defect -- an inability to pick
a winner (but remember, nothing's perfect) -- it did put to rest some nasty
aspersions that have long been cast on the workings of this blessed republic.
Most particularly, it buried once and for all the cynical notion that money
can buy the Presidency. Both parties spent hundreds of millions of dollars
trying to do just that -- and came up empty.

So let's not hear any more nonsense about the Presidency being for sale. It's
now quite clear that the Presidency can't be bought; conceivably, though, it
can be stolen.

What remains to be determined is which of the pretenders can pull off the
theft. Mr. Bush would seem to enjoy a congenital advantage, since the
governor of the state whose votes ultimately will prove decisive is his baby
brother.

On the other hand, Al Gore has the overwhelming support and counsel of the
trial lawyers. Trial lawyers, after all, make a profession of knowing how to
get away with murder. So they should find figuring out how to snatch the
Presidency mere child's play.

Not the least remarkable thing about this most remarkable year is that the
Supreme Court seemingly has abandoned its long tradition of following the
election returns in favor of helping to shape them. The good part is that
there are nine of them-seven mostly old men and two women of a certain
age-assuring a majority ruling, unless one recuses himself because he simply
can't stand Florida.

Only in America in the year 2000.

-- As you're undoubtedly and possibly painfully aware, 2000 is already
memorable in Wall Street as the year the air began to whoosh out of the
monster stock-market bubble and, after many a frustrating try, the year the
bears finally ate Goldilocks.

In fact, unless such portents as mounting claims for unemployment insurance
and the latest downbeat readings on business from the purchasing managers are
completely misleading, 2000 will go down as the beginning of the end of the
most salutary and long-lived economic boom to grace this nation (and probably
any other).

These are, admittedly, negative distinctions. But if you're a year and want
to be famous, you can't be picky: No one harks back to 1929 because it was a
great year for butterflies.

Nasdaq unarguably has turned in a once-in-a-lifetime performance this year.
Never before has a stock-market index caused as much pain in so short a time
as did Nasdaq in its breathtaking (and wealth-evaporating) 50% drop from its
March high to its close last Thursday. What's more, it has a full month to
better (worsen?) that fantastic feat.

Nor does the plunge in the index -- formidable as it is -- do full justice to
the awesome decline. A much more graphic picture is painted by the slides in
individual issues. Here, we're indebted to a sometime correspondent named
Howard Boyet, who sent us a list of 90 of the most gruesome casualties. Alas,
space -- and solicitude for those readers of an especially delicate
disposition -- prevent us from listing the entire wretched roster. But a
sampling will give you the flavor.

For instance, Foundry Networks, which peaked at 212, was last seen at around
41. Harmonic has fallen from 158 to 7-plus. Internet Capital from 212 to 6.
FreeMarkets, from 370 to 29.50 (not quite free yet, but it's getting there).
VA Linux, from 320 to 8. Red Hat, 151 to 6. Inktomi, 241 to 24. DoubleClick,
135 to 13. Akamai, 346 to 27. Next Level, 202 to 11 (we dread to contemplate
the stock's next level). MicroStrategy, 333 to 12 (might be something wrong
with the strategy). Ask Jeeves, 144 to 10 (if it's all the same, we'd rather
not ask him). And on and drearily on.

So if you own stocks like Dell Computer (60 to 18) or Gateway (81 to 19) or
Texas Instruments (100 to 37) or Oracle (46 to 26), you can take some comfort
in the knowledge that you could have owned any of the above or the likes of
Razorfish (57 to 3), Novell (44 to 6) or Covad (67 to 2).

These exercises are now commonplace, and journalistically, we suppose,
they're the equivalent of a circus freak show. But they do, as Mr. Boyet
suggests, provide a more vivid and even more accurate description of the
damage wrought.

What we've found most intriguing is that, until now, all this blood in the
Street has evoked very little public outcry. We've experienced a kind of
cruel and vast but silent mugging. Magazines like Time and Newsweek haven't
done their usual heavy-breathing treatments, nor have most newspapers,
including the New York Times, made a front-page fuss about the decline and
fall of Nasdaq. Nor are the networks running their usual inane specials.

Moreover, until quite recently, mutual-fund shareholders have placidly
watched their wealth withering. No crowds gathering in front of fund
headquarters and, more tellingly, no rush to redeem their holdings.

There are several possible explanations for this rather astonishing
diffidence on the part of the financially wounded and the absence of hysteria
in the press, both the electronic version and the genuine item. The
distraction of the election that never ends. The fact that most everyone who
wants one still has a job and a relatively high comfort level. Whatever the
cause or combination of causes, that we're in a bear market, and a vicious
one, doesn't seem to have sunk in yet.

Until it does and until fear stalks the Street and an ugly grizzly makes the
cover of Time, if you run into anyone claiming to espy a bottom, take him
firmly by the hand and guide him to the nearest ophthalmologist.

-- That chart adorning this page depicts another reason why there's lots of
room still on the downside. (See accompanying illustration -- Barron's Dec.
4, 2000) It comes to us courtesy of George Gilman, the savvy and talented
producer of the Business Picture, a wonderful quarterly compilation of charts
and info on the economy and the markets.

The last official number for the Nasdaq P/E, he reports, was 139.1 for
October, but he reckons the figure fell to somewhere around 107 by the end of
November.

As George comments: "Even after the 48.5% decline from the March 10 peak of
5048.62 to Thursday's close of 2597.93, the P/E on Nasdaq is incredibly high."

And that's the point. The multiple wouldn't be cheap at half its current
level. Nor would it shock us if, eventually, Nasdaq and its P/E fell another
50%.

-- While we're convinced we're in the early stages of a secular bear market,
we know there'll be blips in this descent just as there were dips in the late
great bull market.

In truth, we're surprised we haven't had a halfway decent rebound yet.
Certainly, we're overdue for one. Consider this a heads-up on what might
trigger a bounce (apart from a miraculous resolution to the election snarl).

Next Tuesday, Alan Greenspan is slated to deliver the keynote address to a
gathering of commmunity bankers in New York City (which is not overrun by
community banks but is a great place to visit). We haven't a clue as to what
he intends to say, and it might well be nothing intelligible.

But should Mr. G make a sly reference to the economy and monetary policy and
hint that maybe the Fed is poised to shift from tight to neutralthat just
could rouse spirits in Wall Street enough to ignite a fairly brisk -- if
relatively brief -- move up.

-- John Liscio died last week. John was our colleague at Barron's for roughly
a half-dozen years in the late 'Eighties and early 'Nineties, and not a day
went by that he didn't light up the place.

He was vibrant and funny, outrageous and irreverent, extraordinarily
intelligent. He was brash and tough and had an insatiable appetite for
mischief. Yet he was also warmly affectionate, shirt-off-his-back generous
and, oddly, possessed of a touching ingenuousness.

John had an expansive mind that ranged restlessly and relentlessly over just
about every subject known to literate and inquiring man and a few that only
his special imagination provided entry to. He was a baseball nut, a
cantankerous pitcher for and captain of Barron's softball team and a demon
participant in the Fantasy League, where grown men play at being
owner-managers of major-league teams. In fact, he was the commissioner of his
league (in which role, we can only surmise, he visited great anguish on his
fellow Fantasy Leaguers).

As a writer, John was exceptional. He brought to economics and markets a
knowledge not only of those murky subjects but also of the wide world; a
gifted and fluent pen and a sense of humor that could be -- inevitably was --
deliciously wicked. He would leap with positive glee on some unfortunate with
a tempting name. There was a chap named LaWare at the Fed, for example, whom
John inevitably and with some purpose called UnaWare. Morgan Stanley
economist Stephen Roach was rarely mentioned by John but as the proprietor of
the Roach Motel, where the facts check in but don't check out.

He was a brilliant journalist, both at Barron's and at U.S. News, and,
against all advice and odds, launched an economic newsletter, the Liscio
Report, which became a roaring success. The reason was simply that John had
more wit in one pinky and more insight in the other than any dozen economists.

John, who was spunk personified, showed unbelievable courage as he battled
his last illness. When we visited him in his hospital room and told him
joshingly he looked like hell, he grinned that indomitable grin of his and
launched into a couple of hours of dissertation on the state of the world,
excitedly detailing his plans for the future.

He was the most indomitable person we've ever met. All of us here at Barron's
and, for that matter, anyone lucky enough to have known him, will miss him
terribly.


One hundred and forty two hours ago, I wandered into the Houston Casino, not
really sure why other than a free floating anxiety that could only be
appeased by attending to the ministerial tasks in life that so frequently
make us forget how good life is.  So after a rousing game of tennis on Friday
morning while my children were frolicking with Dede's 3 children at the
Houston Country Club, I tackled my desk and made head way to no where. After
trashing 457 emails, I opened the the 458th.  And then it came to me.  An
epic. A history. A sense of time, commitment and value. A place where my
roots are (as you all know, my mom and dad are buried in a family graveyard
200 feet from the only barn not burned in the Shenandoah valley during the
Civil War and which was used a Yankee hospital).  And of course there is the
hope of sustaining energy to cope with this lackluster, stressful career in
the Casino.

And the Gods must have seen this coming too.  Being meager and always wanting
to commit small, I sought only volume 1 of the opus.  Not to be found.
Plenty of volume 2s and 3s but not a volume 1 to be found.  Other than in the
sole, 3 volume set, neatly packages in the box, high up on a lonely shelf.  I
knew I was on the right track when the person behind me tried to grab it out
of my hands.  I fought and won.

I'm now on page 32 having met Jefferson Davis and Dear Abe.  At this rate
I'll be finished in about 4 years, a true history of the war.

May Shelby be with us all  providing sustaining .......

es

	Christian Yoder
	04/16/2001 11:12 AM

		 To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Notice of flare up of Civil War imagery

I'm sure there's a scholar out there who has already published that big
magnum opus on "Dogs in the Civil War."  However, Shelby Foote doesn't
mention a single dog in his work and so the topic hasn't entered my
imagination.  Your name is Patrick Cleburne.  I'm sorry about the gender
thing, but your spirit and behavior is the same as his and you're going to
have to go through this reading cycle bearing my comments about his behavior.
I'll try to work in some dog analogies if I can.  Cleburne was a German
Shepherd if there ever was one.  I would have hated to be across that line
looking at his formation over there.   ----cgy

From: Genia FitzGerald on 04/16/2001 07:43 AM CDT
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Notice of flare up of Civil War imagery

Christian,

Isn't there some canine hero/heroine that is mentioned in one of the history
books?  I would prefer waging the battle as a four-legged soldier, North or
South it doesn't matter, we are here just to serve our Masters.

Awaiting my name

	Christian Yoder
	04/12/2001 05:37 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Notice of flare up of Civil War imagery

One hundred and forty two years ago today, the great great great grandfather
of Stacy Dickson, a guy named Edmond Ruffin, when other sober minded men held
back, stepped up to touch a burning torch to a big cannon pointed across the
Charleston harbor at Fort Sumter and touched off the great Civil War. His
rash temper caused him to play directly into Lincoln's hand and forever after
it would be said:  "The South started the war."   On this anniversary day,
Clyde Durham, itinerant journeyman energy attorney,  touches off his third
consecutive reading of Shelby Foote's great American Iliad about that war,
this reading giving him more sustaining energy to cope with his lacklustre,
stressful career in the Casino than any other theraputic activity he has yet
found.   The Civil War imagery and analogies  will be flowing soon.  I see
Elizabeth as a daughter of old Virginia with the Sager homestead right there
in the Valley where much of the action took place.  I'm not sure where your
folks would have fit in Genia, but you will soon be  assigned the proxy name
I can't think of at the moment, the Irish warrior who fought for the South.
Unfortunately I am on the North side.  I hope this won't cause serious
professional difficulties for us as we wade through the epic battles and
their respective corporate analogies. ----cgy


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041513.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred: -120.00 / Final: -100.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  30.00 / Final:   9.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


just got a call from the realtor.  they expect us at 11 am at their office in
S.B. tomorrow.  lalime's (sp?)  is cool.  ask prentice about it.

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	11/03/2000 04:52 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: game

We should go to dinner first.  I am trying to make reservations - do you
have a suggestion??

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:    Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:   Friday, November 03, 2000 2:43 PM
To:   Cameron Sellers
Subject:   RE: game

11 am it is on saturday.  yes i'm going to see kathy cowlick.


Too bad I didn't talk with you a little earlier.  This sounds like a great job, and ultimately I would be very interested.  However, I'm basically under a 1-year deal now, so I won't be available until Feb '03.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall Brown [mailto:Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Crandall, Sean
Subject:

Sean,
     Good luck at UBS.  I have attached the job description I was telling
you about.  We are also in the market for good marketers, traders and
structurers.  Keep in touch.

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters
Phone #: 212-704-0596
Fax #:212-704-4312
marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
www.robertwalters.com

 <<NW.DOC>>

**********************************************************************
CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************


Chris,

How is it going buddy?  Hey, when is the big date?  I received a Tax
Statement on the land yesterday.  Just checking to see how you are.
Keep Your Powder Dry!  Really!!!

Don

Dow
W. Don Germany, Jr.
2301 N Brazosport Blvd
B 3611, Investment Recovery
Freeport, Texas 77541

Pager 1 800 451 0491 (0448)
Office 979 238 2102
Mobil 979 236 6040

Home 979 548 7034


Hey Rob,
I still need to get this approval.

Thanks,

Eric
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 08:12 AM
---------------------------
Eric Bass   02/20/2001 02:47 PM

To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Product Approval

Hey melba,

I need to get IF GD/D Waha for Mar approved.

Thanks in advance,

Eric


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


Bill,

One suggestion.  In Section III, given the reference to all dockets in the related filing, the second sentence should be changed to read:
These applications seek, among other requests, to extend PG&E's existing intrastate. . . .

Glen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 11:19 AM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Hass, Glen
Cc:	Porter, J. Gregory
Subject:	Motion to Intervene in PG&E FERC Proceeding

Attached for your review and comments is a draft of a motion by TW to intervene in the PG&E FERC proceeding.

 << File: PG&E.doc >>


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 03:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Inja Chun                           09/25/2000 12:52 PM

To: Dan Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes

Dan and Tom,
As we discussed, I am aggressively seeking well qualified top talent
permanent and contract personnel for both Commodity Logic and Deal Bench.  We
have specified our requirement for specialized technical experience
(WebLogic, Java, JSP, HTML) and we are receiving many promising resumes in
response.  We talked with Andersen Consulting, PriceWarterhouse, Enform,
Valtech, Common Vision, Delinea, etc. and we made it clear that we want them
to augment our permanent staff rather than doing a turn-key operation to
which they have all agreed.

Attached are some of the preliminary resumes and fee schedules from EnFORM,
we expect many others to be in approximately same range of rates.  If you
have any questions, please let me know.
      Thanks,
      Inja

PROPOSAL- summary
Technical BUSINESS MODEL DEVELOPMENTJava Support
 Offer Expires on October 30, 2000

 Page 2 of 2

Category	Resource	Level	Availability
			Date	Billable Rate
Technical Mgr	Bryan, Curt	Senior Manager	October 3	$180 (65% Std)
Sr. Architect	Zhou, Xiaodong	Senior Manager	October 3	$180 (65% Std)
	Andrews, Jim	Senior Manager	Now	$180 (65% Std)
Architect	Kounthapanya, Sam	Lead Senior	Now	$125 (70% Std)
	Tran, Tommy	Lead Senior	October 16	$125 (70% Std)
	Moore, Paula	Senior Consultant	Now	$110 (70% Std)
	Kefi, Omar	Senior Consultant	October 16	$110 (70% Std)
Data Architect	Smith, Maria	Manager	Now	$145 (60% Std)
Sr. Developer	Chung, Brandon	Senior Consultant	October 3	$110 (70% Std)
	Hamilton, Matthew	Senior Consultant	October 30	$110 (70% Std)
	Moore, Eric	Senior Consultant	October 30	$110 (70% Std)
	Yeager, Nathan	Senior Consultant	October 30	$110 (70% Std)
Jr. Developer	Cherry, Travis	Staff Consultant	Now	$55 (60% Std)
	Dauphin, Doug	Staff Consultant	Now	$55 (60% Std)
	Olson, Sara	Experienced Consultant	October 9	$80 (60% Std)
	Sample, Matt	Experienced Consultant	October 30	$80 (60% Std)

---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 11:00 AM
---------------------------

"Martin, Dan" <Dan.Martin@enform.com> on 09/22/2000 05:38:30 PM
To: inja.chun@enron.com, john.spitz@enron.com
cc: "Wendler, Doug" <Doug.Wendler@enform.com>, "Rodriguez, Melody"
<Melody.Rodriguez@enform.com>
Subject: EnFORM Proposal and Resumes

Inja and John,
Again, it was a pleasure meeting with you yesterday.  As promised, I am
sending the resumes of candidate architects and developers along with a
short proposal for your review.   I also included the resumes of a few very
capable Junior Developers in case you see a need for additional horsepower
at a very low rate.   If possible, I would like to stop by for a short 10-15
minute meeting with you on Monday so I can deliver a hard copy and then walk
you through our proposal.

As you can imagine, we are very interested in working with Enron so we have
given you the selection of our best folks and we have priced these
individuals very aggressively.  I look forward to working with you in the
near future.

Regards,

Dan Martin
Director, Java Technology
(713)350-1829

  <<Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt>>  <<Enron_Proposal_1.doc>>  <<Enron
Java Resumes.zip>>

 - Introducing EnFORM to Prospects.ppt
 - Enron_Proposal_1.doc
 - Enron Java Resumes.zip


Dave,

Attached please find my comments to the above-referenced Agreement.  Please
call me with any comments or questions.

Jason


I.  I thought it would be helpful to put the following in writing for
everyone based upon our conversations with Ron Astin.

In making ownership determinations the following applies:

1.  Where warrants are also owned:

warrants (exercisable within 60 days by "Enron") + stock owned
________________________________________________________________

warrants (exercisable within 60 days by "Enron") + stock issued and
outstanding

2.  Where preferred shares are owned:

If preferred class is public, it must be included.
If preferred class is private, but convertible to common public, it must be
included.
If preferred class is private (and not convertible to common public), and we
do not own 10% of any other class that is public, then it does not need to be
included.

3.  Where the shares are owned via a joint arrangement of any type, please be
sure that the share numbers that are being reviewed and to be provided to
legal include the gross shares held in the joint arrangement, and the "Enron"
net shares (our % interest applied to the gross).  We need both numbers to
coordinate our analysis.  Only the net share number will be swapped.


give me a call when you get a chance.  i got your message this morning.  i
don't think i will get to austin for at least a few weeks so it would be best
if you just mailed the check.


Please see attached.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
03:41 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Harris@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/17/2000 02:08 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nancy Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Glenn E
Matthys/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Enron Pipeline Company - Argentina S.A. ("EPCA")

The purpose of the account is to buy 0.5% of TGS shares.  By buying those
shares, Enron will be able to utilize NOLs that are currently trapped in
CIESA, the parent company of TGS.  Jeff Kinneman's group will handle actual
market execution.  Glenn, please forward to Ted and Sara a  copy of the
signed DASH.

Regards,  Bruce

Sara Shackleton@ECT
01/17/2000 02:03 PM
To: Bruce Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Muchmore/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Enron Pipeline Company - Argentina S.A. ("EPCA")

Would someone please provide me with an explanation of the purpose of this
account.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000
02:02 PM ---------------------------

Susan Bailey
01/17/2000 01:11 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Pipeline Company - Argentina S.A. ("EPCA")

Sara,

Ted Murphy has executed the documents relating to the opening of a brokerage
account for EPCA @ Morgan Stanley.  Ted has asked that you send him an e:mail
message as to the purpose of the EPCA brokerage account.

Thanks.


The revised redline is OK with Fred Lagrasta per Derek Bailey


I'll be there.  I mean it this time.  Really.

D

From:  Bryan Hull
08/01/2000 11:28 AM

To: O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Game at 6:00

Our game is at 6 this week. Who will be there?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:11 PM
To:	Whalley, Greg; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Delainey, David; Lay, Kenneth; Koenig, Mark
Subject:

Revised documents (reflecting less definitive statements on earnings)