Bob and I just spoke with Steve Susman.  I tried to mention the points you asked.  Here are his comments:

	1.  F&J probably could not simply send us our files back and put itself in a position to be adverse to us with Arthur Anderson.  Susman believes that there is a "hot potato" rule that prevents F&J from doing so.

	2.  That being said, Susman doesn't care if F&J represents Arthur Anderson or anyone else potentially adverse to us in the actions he is handling.

	3.  Susman would not, however, agree to a broad advance ethical waiver, as proposed by F&J.  He does not believe such waivers are effective.  Susman would agree to a waiver once we were advised who F&J wanted to represent.  I don't know whether F&J would agree to this or not.

	4.  Susman recognizes that we cannot force F&J to take on the new Mariner matter, and that this is ultimately a risk/benefit decision for us to make, and that we may have to agree to terms that we otherwise wouldn't agree to.

	Parenthetically, I have received no comments on F&J's proposed waiver letter.

	Under the circumstances, from his standpoint, Bob is inclined for us to get the best deal on the waiver letter that we can with F&J, but that if F&J won't budge, that we take something along the lines of what they have given us (Bob, let me know if I have mischaracterized your thoughts).

	From my standpoint, I unfortunately think there are some parts of the letter that we must have changed.  This would be to the extent that the letter purports to have Enron Corp. agree to bind all the Enron entities, and to the extent that it involves Enron's agreement to what will happen after the Dynegy merger (as I set out in my earlier e-mail).  My recommendation would be, as set forth in my earlier e-mail, that only the Enron entities currently being represented by F&J sign it and be bound by it, and to remove the language regarding what Enron would agree to after the Dynegy merger.  I also find the advance ethical waiver language repugnant, but could agree to it if the other modifications mentioned could be made.  I do not know whether F&J would be willing to make these changes or not.

	Our biggest problem right now is time-management.  I know that Mariner wanted to make a decision by today as to who to use.  I am willing to confer with Dutton ASAP to see what F&J would agree to, and if he can agree in principle, to send him a proposed draft agreement.  I believe he is out of the office but is checking his voice-mail.

	Please let me know what you want me to do.

	Britt


Chris,

Find that local production list when you have a chance and forward it to me.

Thanks.


Congrats on your promotion.  It was well deserved!


Jeff -
pls call Bev on her cell (916.708.1800) ASAP.

Thanks,
Joseph


Good.  I'm going to Cabo thursday and will be back early sunday.  If you have a few samples, I'll pick one, and well go forward.  Can we order the 3 sofas, and send them the fabric when it comes so we can get in the line of orders?  No problem on the check.

What do you think of them?  Be brutal.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Swartz, Cristina" <CSWART@coair.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE:

Retail for couch is $5460 (saving $1170 about  27% lower)
Retail for loveseat $4200 (saving $900 about 27% lower.)
I may be able to save you more on the fabric if I can find the one you need
at Kravets since they give me 50% off.  The majority of the furniture stores
only give between a 20-30% off.  The couches take about 6-8 weeks if they
are in stock and usually are.  I'll get some fabric this Friday during lunch
and maybe I can show you over coffee that afternoon.  I'll need to order the
fabric so add another 2 weeks at least before the store gets it.  Also, I'll
find out paying conditions but usually is 50% upfront (cash) and then the
other 50% when ready for delivery.  They don't take credit card.  Checks
payable to me and I pay with my company check.
I'll get moving and call you on Friday.
Sound good?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:25 PM
To: CSWART@coair.com
Subject: RE:

Holy cow this is expensive.  Of course I don't care about your 5% or so,
but what is the retail on these babies?  I'm pretty flexible on the
fabric--mid range would be fine.  Let's move ahead.  (2 loveseats though,
not 1)  How long did they say?

Jeff

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Swartz, Cristina" <CSWART@coair.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 5:04 PM
   To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
   Subject:  RE:

   OK...
   Sofa = $4290
   Loveseat = $3300
   8.25% tax = $626.18.
   Total = $8,216.18.  Both w/out fabric.

   You need a total of 23.5 yards of fabric.  I usually get about a 30-35%
   discount on fabric so if you are OK with the couch prices, I can go to
   the
   Decorative Center and get some fabric samples for you to choose from.  I
   have no clue as to how much indoor/outdoor fabric goes for but I'll get
   a
   range so that you can see the difference between the cheaper and
   expensive
   type.  Let me know how you would like to proceed.
   Thanks, Tina

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Shankman, Jeffrey A. [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 10:30 AM
   To: cswart@coair.com
   Subject:

   Hi Tina,

   Thanks for you help.

   The site is www.thewickerworks.com.  Click on it to go directly there.
   The are in Houston at Walter Lee Culp.  713 623 4670.

   If you go to their web site go to the home page, then to the tab that
   says wicker, then to the tab that says more.  The design is Helva.

   I need 1 Helva sofa, and 2 Helva loveseats, of course in a very plain
   off white (not tan as one of the pictures shows) indoor/outdoor fabric.

   Or if you have any other ideas, let me know, of course.

   Regards,

   Jeff

   713 853 1761

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


In February, 539,594 Mmbtu were allocated to the our index purchase from HPLR
Liquids at King Ranch.  This allocation resulted in a large physical
unaccounted for loss.  Effectively, the gas was being purchased twice in our
systems.  In addition, a sale to the Liquids group, which should have been
zero, was brokered with a purchase from Swift (2500 Mmbtu/day), resluting in
additional gas being allocated to the HPLR Liquids purchase contract.  I have
attached a schedule detailing the volumes that were double booked in
February.  This schedule also reports the daily volumes for March which will
need to be adjusted.  I have calculated (based on estimates) that we should
have only purchased about 88,000 from the Liquids group at King Ranch for
February.  See the following:

Booked to HPLR Liquids: 539,574  18,606/day
Purch by HPLC @ WH:  379,108  13,073/day
Incorrect Liquids Sale:    72,500  2,500/day
     Adjusted purch from Liquids:   87,986  3,034/day

We usually input a purchase of 2,500 Mmbtu/day from HPLR Liquids at the
tailgate.  We can increase this to 3,000/day for March.

The majority of gas in the 3-Rivers system is transported to the King Ranch
plant through HGPL.  Some of this gas is purchased at the wellhead by HPLC,
some of the gas is purchased at the wellhead by HPLR Liquids, and three
producers have the option to either sell their gas to HPLC at the wellhead or
to process their gas and sell the residue to HPLC at the tailgate of the
plant.  It is very important to keep the meters and volumes allocated
correctly among parties related to these transactions.  The attached schedule
should assist in doing this.  I have reported the meters at which HPLC buys
wellhead gas.  The movement of this gas through HGPL and King Ranch should be
kept seperate from the gas purchased by the Liquids group.  A transport usage
ticket can be used to show the transfer of HPLC's gas from King Ranch to HPL.

Let's plan on discussing this either Friday or Monday afternoon.  Let me know
what works best for you.

D


Deb,

We need a product change on an account in STAT.  The account number is
25963461006 and the utility is NSTAR/BECO (Boston Edison Company).  Please
let me know what, if any, information you need from me such as a copy of
the change request, etc.  I am new at this stage of the process, so I'm not
quite sure what my role is...let me know what assistance you need.

FYI...I confirmed during a conference call with Bill Hatch and Richard Ring
that the pricing on this account, for the calendar year 2001, should be as
follows:

   tier one: 175,000 kwh @ $.055
   tier two:  225,000 kwh @ $.0525
   tier three:  remaining kwh @ $.049
   Enron Discount computation should remain as it currently is.

Please let me know when we can expect completion on this as the customer is
looking for a resolution date.

Thanks,
Dyaniese

---------------------- Forwarded by Dyaniese A Brown/TMG/CSC on 09/13/2001
05:10 PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded      Pamela J Thompson/TMG/CSC
 image moved    09/13/2001 04:25 PM
 to file:       (Embedded image moved to file: pic30836.pcx)
 pic10291.pcx)

To:   Dyaniese A Brown/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:   bhatch@enron.com, rring@enron.com

Subject:  Re: GSA: Urgent Need for Pricing Correction in STAT  (Document
      link: Dyaniese A Brown)

Please notify Deb Weakley that we need a product change on this account.

Pam

Dyaniese A Brown/TMG/CSC
09/13/2001 02:49 PM

To:   Pamela J Thompson/TMG/CSC@CSC
cc:   bhatch@enron.com, rring@enron.com

Subject:  GSA: Urgent Need for Pricing Correction in STAT

Pam,

I just had a conference call with Bill Hatch and Richard Ring.  They have
advised me that we are pricing one of our GSA accounts incorrectly.
According to Change Request number 0458-Rev 3,  the pricing should be
tiered.  This is not currently happening.  Who do I contact in Order
Provisioning to assist me with this correction?  Also, please advise as to
the ETA of a change such as this.

Thanks,
Dyaniese


Please forward to all your direct reports
---------------------- Forwarded by Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000
11:23 AM ---------------------------

Norma Villarreal
11/16/2000 11:23 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HR Deadlines and Action Items

PEP system for feedback
ACTION ITEM
Employees need to provide feedback on requested employees
Supervisor's need to contact employee's requested reviewers (via phone mail
or email) who have not submitted feedback.
Deadline for PEP Feedback: Friday, November 17, 2000 CST

Open Enrollment for 20001 Benefit Election
ACTION ITEM
Employees who want change their Benefit election need to go to
www.enron.benefitsnow.com or call 1(800)425-5864.  If you do not have your
2001 Enrolment Personal worksheet which contains your personal identification
number please contact benefits at 1(800)3327373 option 1.
Extended Deadline: Friday, November 17, 2000, 5 p.m. CST

Bonus Defferal Election
ACTION ITEM
Employees wishing to receive stock options and phantom stock in lieu of all
or a portion of the cash bonus received during 20001 can will need to access
ehronline.enron.com.
Deadline: Friday, December 8,2000 CST

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Norma Villarreal
HR Generalist
X31545


Now that we have implemented SAP, the BUs have come together to form teams to
fill the gaps and explore opportunities to make more efficient use of SAP in
the areas of Financial, Human Resources and Global Sourcing.  Melissa Becker
will coordinate the efforts of the various teams.

The Financial teams, including process leveraging (with Jan Johnson as lead)
and reporting (led by Mark Frank), will be working together over the next 6
to 12 months since their objectives touch or overlap in many areas.
Together, this effort is Project Sunrise.  The teams will be gathering
information from accounting personnel in each BU about key information needs
and key processes, to identify opportunities that would benefit all BUs as
well as to identify BU-specific opportunities that the BUs may wish to pursue.

The teams' objectives are to work with the BUs to:

1. Create better, more user-friendly reporting capabilities
A. Implement short term measures to address current "hot" reporting issues
(e.g., labor distribution and project management) (Susan Bellinghausen is
spearheading this effort.)
B. Develop and implement medium term measures to improve access to
information (e.g., data warehouse with web-based access)
C. Develop and implement longer term web-based tool addressing 4 key areas
(costs, P&L, counterparties and cash)
2. Improve processes to provide better quality, more timely information
A. Implement process changes required to execute reporting objectives
B. Shorten close process
C. Improve basic "blocking & tackling" related to controls
D. Share best practices among BUs

Representatives from the BUs working on these two teams will be:

Steve Thatcher  ENA
Caroline Lothian Europe
Joe Darensbourg International regions
Howard Selzer  International regions
Steve Frazier  EES
Madeline Chan  EBS
Dave Wittenburg ETS
Jill Erwin  Corp Acctg and EGF

The following are subject matter experts (SMEs) in various BUs and functional
groups who will spend varying amounts of their time in addressing specific
issues.

James Weitekamp ETS (planning)
Sayed Khoja  EGM
Allen Ueckert  International regions (project systems)
Glenn Kobes  Tax
Brandee Sanborn ISC

We will continue to identify others who will share their expertise.

The following people will be working specifically on data warehouse and
web-based reporting initiatives:

Beverly Fennesey ISC
Li Chan   ENA
Pat Cagney  EES

The teams will begin by interviewing persons identified by the CAO of each
BU, to determine their information needs and to review their processes, while
continuing to develop the data warehouse and creating the web-based reporting
tool.  The efforts of the process leveraging and reporting teams are vital to
our being able to quickly obtain key information to run our businesses.  I
appreciate all of your efforts to date with regard to SAP and now, Project
Sunrise.  The ultimate success of these efforts depends on all of us working
together to learn to fully utilize and optimize the new tools we have
available to us.  Thanks again for all your help.


Rewards Newsletter
December 20, 2001
Issue Number 33

Dear Theresa, here's how you can earn up to 10,000 points and more!

Dash into the New Year on a cheery note by racking up those Rewards points!
SportsLine Rewards is your FREE ticket to a happy holiday season where you
can enjoy the convenience of earning points right from your computer! So
say good-bye to the holiday hustle and bustle...and Reward yourself with an
early holiday present today!

*****************************************************************
To view the COLOR version of this newsletter, click here:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/u/newsletters/121901.htm
*****************************************************************

Here are 5 EASY ways you can earn points!

1.Become a Rewards PLUS member and earn 5,000 points plus awesome bonus
gifts! In addition, you will get 10% OFF any purchase at MVP.COM.
Interested? We'll give you 100 points now just for looking!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/u/rewards/upgradeplusrd.htm

2.Play sports trivia every day for up to 510 points! Enter Today!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextrewtrivia.cgi

3.Click on the CBS SportsLine.com, MVP.COM, & Bonus Partner links daily
for up to 30 points!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextearnpointseasyway.cgi

4.Refer-a-friend to SportsLine Rewards PLUS for 5,000 points per
person - UNLIMITED!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextETFeasyway.cgi

5.Surf CBS SportsLine.com every day for up to 50 points!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextsurfsplneasyway.cgi

In addition, Rewards PLUS gives you:

* Double points per-page-view and earned points never expire!
* Access to PLUS only contests, auctions and local events
* Half off everything in the Rewards catalog
* Discounts on selected Fantasy products
* And much, much more...

Interested? Click on the link below and get more information on how to
receive your BONUS gifts!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextupgrade.cgi

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Great Gift Ideas
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Holiday Savings!
MP3 Players, PC's and more up 70% off retail. uBid now!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextubid.cgi

IT'S COLLEGE BOWL TIME!
Rose, Sugar, Fiesta, and Orange- where is your team playing this year?
Get your College Bowl Matchup Tees Here!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextcollegebowl.cgi

Last Minute Gift Idea! Having trouble picking out that special gift?
Get your MVP.COM Holiday Gift Certificate for the sports enthusiast on
your list.
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextmvpgc.cgi

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextvipvegas.cgi

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Special Holiday Offers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One Million Dollars is still there for the taking. With 3 weeks left, the
Office Pool Challenge is now just 5 dollars. Sign Up today, make your picks,
and you may end up on easy street.
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextftsyopc.cgi

BID NOW on a pair of Motorola i50sx Phones & NFL Phone Covers!
You & a friend will be able to show your team loyalty with the Motorola
i50sx & our officially licensed NFL team phone covers. With the Motorola
i50sx you can use the two-way radio to connect between plays or check scores
on the Internet when you can't catch the game - while showing your team spirit.
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextmotorolaauction.cgi

Go to the Rose Bowl! Would you like to find out how you can see
this year's BCS Championship Game? Click here!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextrosebowl.cgi

Bonus Partner -
Earn 10 Rewards Points for checking out Sports Profiles Plus!
Make sure you cast your vote for the Los Angeles Sports Fans Choice Awards.
You might even win a trip to the awards dinner. When you cast your vote and
register you will receive 500 points! Cast your vote today!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetextsportsprofiles.cgi

~~~~~~~~
Contests
~~~~~~~~
Cal Ripken, Jr.'s Collectible Sweepstakes!
Enter to WIN autographed memorabilia from one of the greatest baseball
legends of all time - Cal Ripken, Jr.! Become a PLUS member, and you could
win a signed Baseball and a color action photo of Cal swinging the bat on
that famous night. It only takes a minute to get a chance to win, so sign up
now-- it's better than scoring in overtime! Click here!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/calssweepsfreetext.cgi

Q&A contest with CBS Sportscaster Jill Arrington!
WIN an autographed picture and football! Yes, your eyes did not deceive you.
Jill Arrington is set to answer YOUR questions.
E-mail your best questions today!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/jillarringtonfreetext.cgi

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Redeem Points!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Football and Hockey Tix! Pro Football and Pro Hockey games in a stadium or
arena near YOU!
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/links/2/42/5/2/freetexthockeytix.cgi

NEXT MONTH'S NEWSLETTER:

Special New Year's Edition filled with new deals and great member exclusives!

HAPPY HOLIDAYS FROM THE SPORTSLINE REWARDS TEAM!

***************************************************************************
You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com.
If you do not want to receive these e-mail offers you can unsubscribe by
clicking this link:
http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/u/newsletters/newsletter.cgi?email=tstaab@enron.com

You are subscribed as [{(tstaab@enron.com)}].

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not responsible
for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the
products or services advertised.

SportsLine.com takes your privacy seriously. To learn more about
SportsLine.com's use of personal information, please read our Privacy
Statement at http://ww1.sportsline.com/links/click.cgi?5&4&1673143&/u/userservices/privacy.htm
*****************************************************************************


-- You signed up to receive special offers at Colonize.com --

                  Dear
                  Patrice,<o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

Congratulations!

You are qualified to apply for a Chase Platinum card
with a low 2.99% intro APR*.

				  Go right now and APPLY
INSTANTLY!
<o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

Your
                  Chase Platinum card features:
                  </o:p>
                   <o:p>
                  <o:p></o:p>

2.99%
                      Introductory APR*

No annual fee

Merchandise protection

Auto rental insuranceA 100% safe online shopping guarantee
					<o:p>

                      </o:p>

A 100% safe online shopping guarantee
					<o:p>

                      </o:p>

Your card is also good at over 16 million locations around
the world, so you can take it with you everywhere you go. <o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

Apply
                  now and get the card that saves you money every time you use it.

Thank
                  you for choosing Chase, where the right relationship is
                  everything.<o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

Sincerely,

                  President<o:p>
                  </o:p>

Chase
                  Manhattan Bank, USA, NA<o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>

                  </o:p>

*
                  See  Important Notices for details.
<o:p>
                  </o:p>

 <o:p>
                  </o:p>

Copyright
                  2001. The Chase Manhattan Bank Corporation. All rights
                  reserved. The Chase Manhattan Bank. Member FDIC.<o:p>
                  </o:p>

Questions? Comments? Email us at: info@colonize.com

You are currently subscribed as: pmims@enron.com

To unsubscribe visit:

http://www.colonize.com/u.php3?e=pmims@enron.com


I know you are both busy.  Lots of push back from London on Doorstep Reviews.  I recognize that our world is pretty crazy right now.  However, it is London's normal stance to push back on the reviews and work to the change the timing.  I think that they view being a subject of a Doorstep review as an elective procedure on their part.

Next week I will follow up with you to get your thoughts on Doorstep efforts during the 4th quarter.  Wanted you to see my reply to Fernley below.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Friday, October  26, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Dyson, Fernley
Cc:	New, James; Jordan, Mike; Apollo, Beth; Brown, Michael - COO London
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

In an October 3 update meeting with Rick Buy and Rick Causey on Doorstep reviews, both were very supportive of the efforts to date this year.  Since we were in the midst of the budgeting process, we wanted their view on the continuation of Doorstep Reviews, and they resoundingly agreed that the effort is valuable to Enron and that they wanted to be certain that the effort continues.

In reviewing the plans for 4th quarter, one of our issues was the willingness of key staff members to travel long distances in light of the September 11th terrorists attacks.  We were in agreement on postponing some of the planned 4th quarter reviews until early 2002.  Planned reviews for the Metals business and certain other EEL lines of business were reaffirmed by Buy and Causey for completion in the 4th quarter.

Certainly life on October 26 feels different today at Enron than it did on October 3.  I understand multiple demands on staff members currently and the additional demands of the budgeting process, and in your case, the voluntary redundancy program.  In the next few days I will again review the 4th quarter plans for Doorstep reviews with Buy and Causey, sharing with them your concerns.  I will let you know the outcome of those conversations.  If there is still a strong desire to complete these reviews this year, we will work creatively to leverage work that is being done through the EAS process and minimize both travel and time involved.  -Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyson, Fernley
Sent:	Friday, October  26, 2001 2:24 AM
To:	New, James; Jordan, Mike
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Brown, Michael - COO London
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

The EAS work takes priority over Doorstep - we need the AA opinion.

I'm afraid that Doorstep is way down my list of priorities at this time - I certainly do not want other things to suffer.

Thanks

Fernley

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	25 October 2001 20:38
To:	Dyson, Fernley; Evans, Coralie; D'arcy, Paul; Jordan, Mike
Cc:	Yeo, Robert
Subject:	FW: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

It's official, we are being door stepped. The Houston plan is to do all of Power and all of the Structures (although when I spoke to Stacey she seemed a little unsure of her plan for structures). Also from what Stacey said the Gas door step will be following shortly.

Stacey and Kristin Albrecht aim to be here for the whole week starting first thing on Monday the 5th. EAS here are already in the loop as they have been various conversations. Obviously with all the additional work we are being asked to do at the moment something will have to give. I aim to speak to Paul Bromley to agree whether the EAS or doorstep work takes priority and to get him to clearly explain which areas will be covered by the doorstep and which by the EAS process since I will be very unhappy if we fail to avoid duplication. In addition, we will also need to make commercial aware of a reduced capacity to perform analytical tasks as well as model review and gap analysis work etc.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	25 October 2001 19:59
To:	New, James
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

We will not be there next week so that should be fine.  Are the complex derivatives group and 'structured book' run by Paul Darcy the same thing?  If yes, then we are planning on reviewing that area.  Should I contact Paul Darcy directly?  If no, what is the complex derivatives group?

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Also in addition can you please confirm that you are not doing the complex derivatives group which is run totally separately in both personnel and risk terms ?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	25 October 2001 18:03
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Are you here next week then because I am due to be away for some of that time ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	25 October 2001 17:47
To:	New, James
Subject:	UK & Continental Power Doorstep

James,

Just a quick note and request regarding our UK & Continental Power Doorstep review we will be performing.  Please provide a list of books, curves and deal types used for UK & Continental Power.  In addition, please send information on any large, structured, out of the norm transactions and any transactions that are calculated outside of the core trading system.

Please provide this information early next week.  Look forward to seeing you.

Stacey


TOO COOL


The deadline for the next electronic newsletter is noon, Wednesday, Dec 6.
We look forward to putting your business highlight or quote in the upcoming
EnTouch.

Hope to hear from you soon!
Michelle Vitrella
x39767


Maria, Please let me know when  you can meet tomorrow.  TK is out tomorrow through Dec 26th, but we can't meet this afternoon because Elizabeth is out today.  So, let me know when Elizabeth & I can get with you tomorrow.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: Conf Call to discuss E. of CA Ques

The other option is to get together this afternoon.  Pls. let me know.  Maria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth; Lohman, TK; Pavlou, Maria
Subject:	Conf Call to discuss E. of CA Ques

Can we all plan to get on the phone with Maria tomorrow (Thurs) at 10:00 to discuss some questions with Elizabeth about East of CA?  We've apparently been inconsistent in our interpretation for different purposes (reporting and system mod's, etc.) and want to get it all straight.

Elizabeth, can you come to th 13th floor and then we'll grab a room/table/office and call Maria?

Thanks!


Susan Bailey in our Group sends out this list.  Your should direct your
request to her.  Thanks!

	Stacey Vallejo
	12/13/2000 02:30 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Updated Executed Master Agreement List

Hi Tana,

Dianne Sieb in our office told me to ask if you could send me an updated list
of all the Executed Master Agreements.  The list I have from the Financial
Trading group isn't totally correct, and I need an up to date version.  Can
you help me?

Please let me know.

Thanks
Stacey
(403)974-6787


Any idea why they did this?  Michelle

"Cover, Mark" <mcover@velaw.com> on 05/09/2000 12:55:26 PM
To: "'Maffett, Randy'" <randal.maffett@enron.com>
cc: "'Cash, Michelle'" <michelle.cash@enron.com>, "'Hamilton, Steve'"
<steve@ecogas.com>
Subject: DOL

Steve Hamilton informed me this morning that the Department of Labor called
him to postpone their investigation scheduled for Monday, May 15th.  They
said they would call again to reschedule later.  We are still proceeding
with our review and report, as are the auditors, and we hope to have our
report ready by the end of this week.  Please let me know if you have any
questions in the meantime.

/s/ Mark A. Cover
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
3700 Trammell Crow Center
2001 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas  75201
(214) 220-7869
(214) 999-7869 FAX
mcover@velaw.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be
confidential and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended to be reviewed
initially only by the individual named above.  If you are not the intended
recipient or a representative thereof, or if you believe you have received
this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination
or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains is prohibited.  If
you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the
sender.  Thank you.

 - C.DTF


Consulting Group that may be able to help with SAP stuff.


Guys:
Here are some questions from PG&E via CSFB.  I will be sending another set of
questions shortly.  Please let me know how you would like to handle these
questions going forward.  Talk to you soon.
Ben
(713) 853-7998
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000
09:23 AM ---------------------------

"Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com> on 09/22/2000 07:46:26 AM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Pastoria

-----Original Message-----
From: Heckler, James
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:45 AM
To: 'ben.rogers@enron.com'; 'don.miller@enron.com'
Cc: Al-Farisi, Omar; Modi, Rishi
Subject: FW: Pastoria

Ben,

Can you get someone to give us an answer on this today, so we may get back
to Tom this afternoon.

Thanks,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: Iaconetti, Louis
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:38 AM
To: Modi, Rishi; Al-Farisi, Omar; Heckler, James
Subject: Fw: Pastoria

Please forward on to Enron.  Include Don Miller, but remember that he is out
of the ofice today and try to get it to somebody who can respond today.

 Thanks.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas <thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com>
To: 'louis.iaconetti@csfb.com' <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com>
Sent: Fri Sep 22 08:22:06 2000
Subject: Pastoria

Is the major maintenance reserve estimate based on a negotiated Long Term
Services Agreement (LTSA)?  If so, will it be in place and transfer with
PEF?

Are spare parts for the first major overhaul included anywhere in the
capital cost estimate or are they assumed to be purchased through the
maintenance reserve estimate (i.e. the LTSA) charge?

Thomas G. Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161
Ph 301-280-6231
Fx 301-280-6911

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - wssinfo.txt


we can get her a lap dance


in the interest of keeping you posted on current developments.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 19/07/2000
13:49 ---------------------------

Paul Hennemeyer
13/07/2000 16:15
To: Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Response on Mergers

Kathryn

Here the summary of the results. It is all I can offer right now as I am
swamped. Hope it helps.

Thanks

Paul


Hey Kevin,
Heres the "Big Spreadsheet" for Sithe.


We will have the phones for this weekend for Enron Canada.  We will get the
phones at 6 on Friday (or thereabouts) and will have them till 6 on Sunday
morning (or thereaboot).  Same as before.  We need to update the calgary log
on explorer and the written log (in the white Canada binder) if there are any
rerates.  Please contact Bill Greenizian, John Zufferli or myself with
questions.

I will be in Las Vegas through Sunday but will be reachable on my cell at
503-887-3449 to answer any questions.

Thanks,
Bill


After the budget session, I thought I needed to make sure one more process is started and in order.     Insurance costs have risen and there may be a disconnect between expectations and actual results.    I would like to think that we can develop the proper insurance program for Wessex and other Operating Companies in a short time.

	I think we will need to determine what levels of insurance and deductibles are needed and then what is the right information to send out in the request for quotes.   	This is so that everyone is dealing with the same information.     I would argue that we should be able to price the deal in the market and then give the group program 	a right to match the deal.    I think the next step is yours, to tell us what levels of insurance and deductibles are needed  and then follow that up with the information 	to go out in the RFP.

	However, it will be necessary to establish some ground rules.     In the event the Operating Company (OC) wishes  to secure a "market price" for their insurance:
	1.	The OC may nominate a broker to secure pricing.  The Broker is subject to CRM's (Corporate Risk Management working for EGS-Enron Global Services) 	approval.  Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld.   An appeal of an adverse decision from CRM to the CEO of EGS is possible.
	2.	CRM will specify and the operating company will supply to CRM,  the necessary underwriting information.
	3.	The OC will specify the types of insurance and coverages,  limits, and deductibles they require for their business.
	4.	CRM will provide the underwriting data and coverage specifications to the competing brokers.
	5.	The competing brokers will be directed by and report to CRM during the bid process and thereafter, if the broker is appointed.
	6.	CRM will receive the proposals from the brokers, evaluate and report the results, with recommendations, to the operating company and the appropriate senior 	manager within Enron.
	7.	OC will elect the program and price they  prefer and CRM will have the right to provide such coverage or direct the appropriate broker in the placement of a 	separate program.
	8.	For locations outside the U.S. the OC may request using their nominated broker for servicing their day to day insurance needs, provided the broker becomes 	a "correspondent" within the established Enron Broker Network.  This will ensure continued co-ordination of the insurance programs.

	I think a progam like this can get everyone closer to a satisfactory conclusion in the process.     Please let me know your thoughts on the proposed program, 	because obviously we need to get started ASAP.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


71

george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com on 03/14/2001 08:18:25 AM
To: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com
cc:
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures Weekly AGA Survey

Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST) TODAY.

Last Year      -31
Last Week      -73

Thank You,
George Ellis
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


Stacey, I need your help in clearing PMA's for Oasis.  I have a lot of PMA's
for 1999 related to rates missing or incorrect.  Would you help me by passing
the information along to me?

Jan 1999
Mar 1999
Jun 1999
Aug 1999
Sep 1999

The Volume Management group (Rita Wynne's group) wants to have the rates
cleared up by Wednesday next week, which means I will probably need to get
something from you by Monday.  Sorry for the late notice.  Please call me at
x 3-1836 if you have any questions.

Heidi


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/05/99
10:10 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           10/05/99 10:08 AM

To: hhawks@tenaska.com
cc: Jeff Skilling@Enron
Subject: SERC/Enron/TVA agreement

Mr. Hawks:  Steve Kean (Enron) asked me to forward this to you.  These are
the Enron comments to TVA yesterday.  Thank you.  Christi Nicolay
713-853-7007.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/05/99
10:04 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           10/04/99 12:07 PM

To: jmaughn@serc1.org
cc: Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SERC/Enron/TVA agreement

To Jim Maughn and Steve Whitley: (I am faxing this to Steve)

Jim and Steve;
Attached are minor comments on the latest draft that we believe address
Steve's concerns on Friday.  Also attached are the examples that we would
like to attach to the agreement.  Dick Ingersoll will call you both today to
discuss.  Thank you.(Use LAUNCH to view redlined)

Christi Nicolay  713-853-7007


Don't forget that Global Finance is supposed to review these.  They have the
turbine contract.


Murli,

Great to hear from you.  I'm glad you accepted the offer - I'm sure you'll
enjoy you're experience at Enron.  Good luck during your final semester.

Kevin


I already responded to this.  Print for my meeting file.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001
07:54 AM ---------------------------

"Heidi VanGenderen" <hvg@carbon.cudenver.edu> on 04/24/2001 04:16:43 PM
Please respond to <hvg@carbon.cudenver.edu>
To: <hvg@carbon.cudenver.edu>
cc:

Subject: Two Requests re: May 22-23 Forum

Greetings:

Thank you for joining us for the May 22-23, 2001 Forum on Securing the
Energy Future of the Western United States here in Denver.  If you require
any audio visual aids for your presentations (overhead projector, LCD,
etc.), please respond to this e-mail ASAP.  Please remember that you will be
asked to remain within the time limits outlined in the memo to
speakers/discussants from Marshall Kaplan and David Olsen.

We are compiling a series of articles on western state power problems and
possible options to overcome problems for distribution to  all Forum
participants.

We welcome your submission of any recent article or articles, or their
citations and/or web page references, that you have found interesting and
useful.  These might address subjects such as power challenges; alternate
policies with respect to supply and demand management; financing power
related infrastructure;  use of innovative technology with respect to energy
management and efficiency; or the convergence of power, environmental and
carbon emission reduction policies.

If you have an article or articles to submit for inclusion in the Forum
Notebook, please convey it electronically by responding to this e-mail, or
fax or mail it as noted in the signature concluding this message by no later
than May 4th.

If you are intending to write out your remarks to the Forum, we would also
welcome receiving those in advance of the Forum for inclusion in the
materials provided to participants.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments.

Thanks for your attention to these requests.  We look forward to seeing you
at the Forum on May 22nd.

Sincerely,

Heidi VanGenderen, Senior Associate
Wirth Chair in Environmental and
Community Development Policy
Institute for Policy Research and Implementation
University of Colorado-Denver
1445 Market Street, Suite 350
Denver, CO  80202-1727
Tel - 303-820-5676
Fax - 303-534-8774

Marshall Kaplan
Tel - 303-820-5605


This impacts the following deals in Sitara,

Deal 222734 - purchase from Alliance
Deal 265943 - purchase from Meng
Deal 227992 - transport usage

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 01:24
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/06/2000 01:04 PM
To: Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal
Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CNR curve

I changed the formula on the IF-CNRGATH curve in the EastMrkt file.  Before
the change it was CGT/APPALAC - $.32.  After the change its (CGAS -
$.30)x(1-.0492).  This widens the spread by about $.24.


Paul and Mark:

Please fill out the attached Internal Security Access Request including your ID under the required information.  Please return the form electronically for process.
 If you have any questions do not hesitate to call me at 36142.

Thanks,

Maggie Matheson


hey mara,

i tried to call your phone number, but just got voicemail.  here are my numbers:  (w) 403 974 6946 (h) 403 262 0205 (c) 403 512 3312 - it would be good to chat, but i'll respond here in case you get this and not your voicemail.  also, a better email is "trycooper@hotmail.com" i've been meaning to write you (it's on my list) but haven't probly because i'm not sure what to say ... i'm glad you got in touch.  i hope you had fun in belize with your family.  i checked and i don't have brinda's email - sorry about that.  i might have her phone number athome, but that won't do you much good i don't think.  also if you are checking out SFSU, you may want to look up someone named Ingrid Binswanger - i went to college with her and she is ultra-cool and might be able to give you the lowdown.  i think she is doing some sort of joint degree and is probly still there - not sure though.

um, yeah, i was a bit surprised when you mentioned the 8 year statistic! but i'm not sure what relevance that really has.  it's too bad things are rocky between you and steve, it seems like you've been together forever.  it was a crazy night and i don't know what else to say, hopefully we will stay in touch better as a result?  it's funny to think that i've known you half of my life at this point.  of course, however you want to handle it is fine by me.  well, if you get this while you are in portland or sf, give me a buzz and i'll tell you what i can, otherwise, call or write and let's stay in touch.  good luck shopping for programs.

cooper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mgiattina@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	portland...

Hey Cooper,
  Well, I don't know if you remember, but I'm heading out to Portland for an interview.  Prob little to no chance I'll end up there, but what the hell, I've never been and it can't hurt to visit.  I remember you saying that you knew Brinda's email.  Do you think you could send it to me?  I'll be there the 14th.

Otherwise, don't really know what to say.  I'm pretty much still reeling from what happened.  I meant it when I said that nothing like this has happened in the last 8 years.  Unfortunately, my future with Steve is looking a little rocky right now, but I still don't know what my motivation was (drunkenness never an excuse...) and I've been pretty upset.  I haven't seen Steve yet, and to be honest I don't think now is the time to bring this sort of thing up to him.  I decide where I will move in feb, and I think it's best if steve and I go our own ways amicably, without this mess (yes, feeble excuse).

Anyway, don't mean to bring up all this crap, b/c it's not yours, but we've been friends for a long time and I respect you and like you, and I really don't want you to think that this is a frequent occurence.  I do wish I was a little more sober, not b/c it would've changed much, but I think it might've been better all around.

So, any advice on Portland or SF would be appreciated (one night in each).  Call 646 342 3507 or email.

Later,
Mara


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020224.txt


Yes to question.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/05/2001 03:55 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: CPUC Prudency Standards

They gotta go.  The heat on Loretta is starting to rise.  Be interesting to
see if anything comes of it.

Best,
Jeff

FYI:  Got your message re: swap IOU bailout for end to investigations.  What
do you think about having Ken Lay, when he delivers the offer to Peevey
tomorrow, "raising" the usefulness of ending the investigations as a means of
getting all of this mess back on a rational, constructive track, which is
what Peevey sez he and the governor want?


I'm not sure that thor understands dollars flowing with risk.  What should we
do with him?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
12:31 PM ---------------------------

Brent A Price
09/29/2000 12:58 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 10 Year Kotka deal

fyi - it doesn't sound like the weather piece of the Oslo long-term deals is
going to have much value.  We are still trying to get that value from Oslo
and ensure that the weather risk is captured appropriately in EGM risk
books.  I will keep you updated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 29/09/2000 12:56
---------------------------

Thor Lien
26/09/2000 23:40
To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 10 Year Kotka deal

Brent

This deal was done as a Power game and when we split it, the main value will
be on the power book, so don't calc on anything substantial on this

Thor

Brent A Price
26/09/2000 20:11
To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 10 Year Kotka deal

Thor - We are going to meet with Jeff Shankman on Thursday to discuss 3rd
Quarter earnings.  If we can get an idea by then of the value associated with
the weather piece of the Kotka deal it would be helpful.  Call me if you have
any concerns regarding this request.  Thanks for your help.

Thor Lien
25/09/2000 23:41
To: D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bjarne Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 10 Year Kotka deal

Todd

We haven't finalised the strip out of the remaining weather risk from the
power book, but we will surely send that over as soon as we have done it

Thor

	From:  D Todd Hall                           26/09/2000 01:21

To: Bjarne Schieldrop/OSL/ECT@ECT, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 10 Year Kotka deal

Bjarne and Thor,

Thanks for the confirmation and other information that you provided on this
deal.  I still need the associated P&L and Weather Risk transferred from the
Nordic Power books to the Weather book.

It is imperative that this be done immediately from a Risk controls
standpoint not to mention the fact that Quarter-end is fast approaching.
Please call or e-mail so as to update me of your progress.

Thanks,
Todd


Attached please find the list of reports that you have had access to.  On the home page each of these reports should be "blue" and any reports you do not have access to should be in "black".  Please let me know which reports not listed in the attachment you should have access to.

I apologize of any inconveniences.

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
713.853.3102

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 10:57 PM
To:	Abel, Chris
Subject:	I am getting a bit fed up

with not being able to access our own reports - this is the second time I have asked.  Please open up the reports to me.  Or is there someone else I should be asking?


See revisions.  Am also attaching the "solutions document" we left with the
Governor.  I think we should follow that basic format and include the
solutions set out there.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/02/2001 01:40 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

It could certainly use some doctoring, but it's getting there. I'm now
shifting my focus to the "informal advisory group" on procurement.


Challenging your manhood would do me no good.  I hope you're not suggesting
that you're going to walk on a bet.  If I owed you $2,320, what would you do?

	Greg Whalley@ECT
	11/22/00 09:14 AM

		 To: Brad Richter/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: For Whom The Bells Tolls...

i don't know if you've heard yet.  maybe you should talk to lavorato.  my
debt is currently trading at about 60-80 cents on the dollar.


Louise,

The iBuyit approval level updates you are requesting for Enron Americas are nearing completion and will be ready to be migrated into production on Friday. We have taken a shot at drafting a proposed communication for your consideration in advising your employees of the changes.

Please advise if you would need any assistance in distributing the communications. Additionally, can you please confirm your approval to migrate the changes into production on Friday.

Thanks
John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roberts, Angela
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:36 PM
To:	Gillespie, John
Subject:	Enron Americas Spend Approval Guidelines


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these
outages.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - 092101.xls
 - 092101R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Praveen Kumar <pkumar@uh.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Friday Visit

Vince,

    Will this Wednesday work for you for lunch at UH? Thanks.

Praveen Kumar
Chair and Professor of Finance
C.T. Bauer College of Business
334 Melcher Hall
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-6021
713-743-4770/713-743-4789 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:09 PM
To: pkumar@UH.EDU
Subject: RE: Friday Visit

Praveen,

Thanks for your message. Can we push the lunch till next week, Wednesday
through Friday?  The situation at Enron is still very fluid and I have to be
available on a very short notice. I cannot leave the building for too long.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Praveen Kumar <pkumar@uh.edu>@ENRON
Sent: Thu 11/29/2001 2:44 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
Cc:
Subject: Friday Visit

Vince,

 If your schedule allows it, Arthur and I would be happy to host you for

lunch tomorrow (the seminar is right after lunch), and talk further. Please

let me know.

Best,

Praveen

Praveen Kumar

Chair and Professor of Finance

C.T. Bauer College of Business

334 Melcher Hall

University of Houston

Houston, TX 77204-6021

713-743-4770/713-743-4789 (fax)

 - winmail.dat


Great.

Let me know what happens. I would imagine there should be some interest in what you guys do. My home email in case is, gilsmith@houston.rr.com

Take care.

Doug
Doug-Gilbert Smith


I added the sentence on the fees to say something like at the request of or
directed by ERMT.  I think this works, because we should only owe fees to
the extent of services provided that we request - in the event we don't
request any, we shouldn't owe anything.

As far as the fee structure, I would think it would need to be cost or
cost-plus.  Obviously, cost-plus looks better from an arms-length basis.

Mark.Taylor@enron.com on 11/06/2001 11:06:57 AM
cc:
Subject:  RE: Comments to Administrative Services Agreement

Thanks  Stuart, I'll add it in.  Two other questions -- should the
performance of the services be delayed until requested at a later date
(there isn't much need for it today) and what do we do about the fees?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   stuart.ogg@weil.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:01 AM
   To:     Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
   Subject:  RE: Comments to Administrative Services Agreement

   We can say the following:

   Provision of office space, which may include office space in the current
   principal offices of the Administrator or such other location in
   Houston,
   Texas or other location as Adminstrator may occupy, and such other
   office
   space as may be reasonably required by ERMT from time to time during the
   term of this Agreement.

   Let me know if you want me to add this or if you are going to do it on
   your
   end - Thanks.

   Mark.Taylor@enron.com on 11/06/2001 10:50:00 AM
   cc:
   Subject:  RE: Comments to Administrative Services Agreement

   One more thing we need to consider is office space.  Can I just add that
   in
   as a "service"?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   stuart.ogg@weil.com@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 8:34 PM
      To:     Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
      Cc:     trish.lindloff@weil.com
      Subject:  Re: Comments to Administrative Services Agreement

      Attached is a revised services agreement to reflect your comments -
   you
      will note that I don't know the actual corporate name or form for
   Enron
      Net
      Works, so that will need to confirmed.  Please let me know if you
   have
      any
      further thoughts or comments on the attached.  Thanks.

      **********NOTE**********
      The information contained in this email message is intended only
      for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
      of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
      agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
      are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
      copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
      have received this communication in error, please immediately
      notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
      message. Thank you.

      (Administrative Services Agreement) (See attached file: 5z6%04!.DOC)
      (Administrative Services Agreement) (See attached file: 5z6%RTF.DOC)
       - 5z6%04!.DOC << File: 5z6%04!.DOC >>
       - 5z6%RTF.DOC << File: 5z6%RTF.DOC >>

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
   all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Scott:
I have faxed to you my thoughts on the latest draft.  Looks like we still
have a ways to go.  talk to you tomorrow.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"SCOTT AVITABILE" <SAVITABI@LLGM.COM>
	06/22/2000 05:07 PM

		 To: <rick.gieryn@ace-ina.com>
		 cc: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 Subject: 621 Riders for ACE Policy.WPD

  Rick:  I faxed this to you last night and again this afternoon, but thought
I would email it also.  I faxed it because it is in WordPerfect, and I was
not sure you would be able to open it.  Best regards.

 - 621Rider.WPD


Hi Maria -

To my knowledge, Mr. Lay has not received his locker assignment.

Thanks.

Rosalee Fleming for Ken Lay.

From: Maria Mitchell/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/26/2001 06:47 PM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Verifying Locker Assignments

February 26, 2001

Thank you for your participation in the Enron Body Shop.
We are currently verifying all locker assignments.  Please
return receipt via this e-mail if you have NOT received
your locker assignment.

Thank you,
The Enron Body Shop Staff


Below is our top 30 gas financial ITM terminated counterparties (CP).  We should focus on these CPs first.  If anyone is aware of other CPs which should be included please let me know.

Counterparty				$Million
------------------------------------------------------	------------------
Calpine Energy Services, L.P.		$358.3
Coral Energy Holding, L.P.		$133.4
PMI Trading, LTD			$80.6
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.		$75.8
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC	$55.3
AIG Energy Trading Inc.			$50.6
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.		$38.4
The New Power Company		$36.8
Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.		$35.2
WPS Energy Services, Inc.		$32.4
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	$30.4
FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.	$28.6
JPMorgan Chase Bank			$25.8
Arizona Public Service Company		$21.9
FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.		$20.6
BNP Paribas				$20.4
Texaco Inc.				$19.7
MidAmerican Energy Company		$17.4
Vitol Capital Management Ltd.		$17.4
BP Corporation North America Inc.	$17.1
Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.	$15.0
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation		$14.3
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.		$14.2
Enbridge Marketing (U.S.) Inc.		$13.7
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Co $13.1
Royal Bank of Canada, The		$12.5
Tudor Proprietary Trading, L.L.C.		$12.1
e prime, inc.		Terminated	$12.1
American Public Energy Agency		$12.0
Garden State Paper Company, LLC	$11.6

We should begin or continue with the process of contract review and collecting confirmations, A/R, and A/P.

Thank you.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Jeff -- I've put together Ken's script for a phone call to Dick Riordan.
Please review the following and let me know ASAP if you have any changes.
Thanks! kd

Ken -- Thank you for making next Thursday, May 17 available for CEO meetings
in California.  We are working to set up two meetings -- one in Los Angeles
and one in Silicon Valley (we'll call on Scott McNealy's contact person to
help pull the Northern California meeting together).   For the Los Angeles
meeting, we'd like you to call Mayor Dick Riordan and ask for his help in
pulling together a group of key, influential business leaders.   As
background, Riordan is a very wealthy Republican businessman who has been
term-limited out and has not yet made public his future political aspirations
(a bid for governor has been mentioned by insiders).

You might congratulate him on helping to settle the Writer's Guild strike and
ask if he'd now like to resolve the energy crisis (He's in a bit of a spat
with Dave Freeman over who can claim credit for LADWP's success during this
energy situation -- see attached LA Times article).

This is an opportunity for Riordan to help broker a solution, and that's why
you're calling him.  You met with Robert Day (Trust Co of the West) who
suggested that you call Riordan and enlist his support.

Explain about our comprehensive solution -- business support is critical to
garner political support.

You'll be in Los Angeles next Thursday.  Ask if he could invite and host a
meeting of key business leaders and introduce you.  I've attached a suggested
list of prominent businessmen, close associates and personal friends of
Riordan's.  We'd like to position this meeting as an insider's conversation
of what's going on with the energy situation.  This meeting should be for
principals only.

Ask Riordan to identify someone in his office who we can work with to set up
the meeting.  Enron's consultant in LA (Marathon Communications) will work to
coordinate the event.

If Riordan is not available next Thursday, ask him if he would ask Eli Broad
(chairman of Sun America and a Democratic billionaire) or Jerry Perenchio
(chairman of Univision) to host the meeting.

Proposed Invitees

*Eli Broad - Chairman, Sun America
*Ron Burkle - Yucaipa Companies
Jeffrey Katzenberg - DreamWorks
Sherry Lansing- Paramount
Nelson Rising- Catellus
Bob Daly - LA Dodgers
Ray Irani - Occidental Petroleum
*Jerry Perenchio - Univison
Michael Eisner/Bob Iger - Disney
Ed Roski - Majestic Realty
Earvin Johnson/Ken Lombard - Johnson Development Corporation
Bruce Karatz - Kaufmann & Broad
Terry Semel - Yahoo!
Gary Winnick - Global Crossing
Henry Yuen - Gemstar
*Carl McKinsey
*Liam McGee - Bank of America
*Barry Munitz - Getty Trust
*Gordon Binder - Amgen (ret)
David Baltimore - Cal Tech
Danny Villanueva - Bastion Capital
Phil Anschutz - Qwest Communications, Staples Center
*Dennis Tito - civilian spaceman (former LADWP Commissioner)
Kent Kresa - Northrop Grumann

Sunday, May 6, 2001
Riordan and Freeman's Feud Erupts in Public
Power: Each questions the other's role in keeping the city free of
California's energy crisis.
By MICHAEL FINNEGAN, TERENCE MONMANEY, Times Staff Writers

?????With California mired in energy troubles, Mayor Richard Riordan and his
former power chief S. David Freeman trumpet the extraordinary fortune of Los
Angeles: no rate hikes and no blackouts.
?????Yet Riordan and Freeman have sullied their mutual success story by
waging bitter campaigns to discredit each other--at first behind the scenes
but now in public.
?????Pettiness, ingratitude, conflicts of interest, overblown claims of
achievement: Such is the back and forth between two leaders who would seem to
have good reason to pat each other on the back.
?????To Freeman, who has resigned as general manager of the L.A. Department
of Water and Power to become chief energy advisor to Gov. Gray Davis, it
seems Riordan resents his high-profile role in trying to steer California out
of the energy crisis.
?????So the mayor, Freeman charged, has elbowed his way into energy issues
that he is ill-equipped to handle and taken steps along the way that could
harm the environment.
?????"With all due respect, I have 25 years of experience and knowledge--and
he has 25 days," Freeman said. "But he's the mayor, and he didn't like it
that I didn't just say yes to everything he came up with."
?????To Riordan, Freeman's efforts to fight air pollution have given short
shrift to the threat of skyrocketing power rates in Los Angeles. The mayor
said Freeman also failed to recognize potential conflicts of interest between
his city and state roles in the power crisis. And he scoffed at Freeman for
saying he had lifted morale at DWP.
?????"Morale was terrible under him," Riordan said. "I mean, they are so
relieved right now."
?????The backbiting has left associates suspecting the clash is really about
egos. City Councilwoman Ruth Galanter sees Riordan and Freeman as proud,
successful men unable to say, "I couldn't have done it without X, Y and Z."
?????"Each of them is used to being the boss and taking pleasure at being
recognized as the boss," she said.
?????Much of the conflict has taken place in private meetings. And the mayor,
a Republican multimillionaire, has taken pains to play down his dispute with
Freeman, a liberal Democrat from Tennessee who wears a cowboy hat and speaks
with a Southern drawl.
?????In an interview after his resignation, Freeman laid out the conflict
point by point, often in terms bluntly critical of the mayor. One of his
concerns, Freeman said, was that Riordan in his final two months as mayor
could reverse the agency's progress in protecting the environment.
?????Freeman cited Riordan's plans concerning coal-fired power plants in
Nevada and Utah that are partly controlled by the DWP, the nation's largest
municipal utility. The first is the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin,
Nev., a plant that has been blamed for spreading some of the haze that
shrouds the Grand Canyon. The DWP had planned to sell its stake in the plant,
but Freeman said Riordan ordered him to back out of the sale.
?????He described the mayor's move as a sign that Riordan and his appointees
on the board that oversees DWP were "completely insensitive to the fact that
that power plant is one of the most environmentally troubling plants in the
West."
?????"I've worked real hard to try to build some environmental sensitivity
into the DWP policy," Freeman said. "And I am concerned as to whether the
current commissioners and the mayor have that sensitivity, and what they
might do in the interim to basically overturn the progress we've made."
?????The other plant is part of the Intermountain Power Project in central
Utah. Riordan has proposed building a new coal-fired generating unit there,
but Freeman said he objected because of the pollution it would cause.
?????In both cases, Riordan said he was striking the appropriate balance
between protecting the environment and meeting the energy needs of Los
Angeles at an affordable cost. By keeping its share of the Mohave plant and
expanding the Utah plant, Los Angeles can avert the astronomical price hikes
of natural gas--and the sharp rise in ratepayers' bills that would follow,
Riordan said.
?????Natural gas, which provides 26% of the fuel for DWP plants, causes less
air pollution than coal, which provides 51%. The rest is mainly nuclear and
hydroelectric. Los Angeles has averted rate hikes and blackouts in part
because the DWP relies less on natural gas than most other California power
providers.
?????"I favor clean air and more natural gas, but not to the point where
we're going to destroy the economy of Los Angeles," Riordan said.
?????On the Mohave plant, Riordan questioned the benefit of selling the
city's share to a buyer that would simply continue running it.
?????"It's still going to be coal-driven," he said. "How does selling it help
the environment?"
?????The tension between the two has built steadily as the state power crisis
has worsened. With the charismatic DWP chief drawing favorable news coverage
in stories on how L.A. has dodged the crisis, Riordan and the DWP
commissioners began to view him as "too big for my britches," Freeman said.
?????The conflict reached its peak on April 17, the day Freeman resigned to
become the governor's advisor. The DWP board president, Kenneth T. Lombard,
said the mayor told commissioners that day that "it made the most sense to
release him immediately."
?????"All we were doing, frankly, was release him from his responsibilities,
and then whatever time he needed to clean out his office was fine with us,"
Lombard said.
?????From Riordan's standpoint, Freeman needed to be stripped of his
authority right away because of a potential conflict of interest: The city
utility sells surplus power to the state, so Freeman would be on both sides
of the sales.
?????Freeman, who had voluntarily bowed out of a DWP meeting on the state
power crisis earlier that day, was outraged at his sudden release, in part
because he was denied the chance to say goodbye to agency employees. In an
interview, he called the conflict of interest assertion "complete malarkey."
?????"The insinuation that I have done anything less than protect the
interests of the city of Los Angeles is bordering on slanderous, considering
what I've accomplished here," he said.
?????Brian D'Arcy, who heads the union local that represents 6,000 DWP
employees, agreed that Riordan and his commissioners "kind of ran him out of
here. For David to be summarily jettisoned out of here without even a
howdy-do is absolutely tacky," D'Arcy said.
?????Riordan said Freeman deserves "an A-plus" for his work at DWP. The mayor
conceded that he knew of nothing that Freeman had done "to hurt Los Angeles."
But, he added, "when you have a conflict of interest, you have to act before
anything happens."
?????Freeman has long bridled at the oversight of DWP, not just by the mayor,
but by the agency's board and the City Council. In 1998, he called for City
Charter amendments to consolidate authority in a more independent board of
directors. The proposal went nowhere.
?????Freeman's concerns were echoed in a report to be released Monday. The
Rand Enterprise Analysis report was commissioned by the DWP. It calls for
restructuring DWP management much the way Freeman proposed. But Riordan and
Galanter, who chairs the Council's Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, rejected the concept. Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


Vince,

Thank you.

We look forward to speaking with you.

Regards,

Barbara

Panalytix, Inc., www.panalytix.com
212 974 1022, b@panalytix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <bbrandfass@panalytix.com>
Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: B. Brandfass

Barbara,

My apologies. I was traveling and then we had the usual end of the quarter
pandemonium.

I am sending you my presentations(See attached file: Risk2000.ppt)(See
attached file: Risk2_w.ppt) and would like to get back to you with
some questions regarding your products.

Vince

"Barbara E. Brandfass" <bbrandfass@panalytix.com> on 07/10/2000 04:15:33 PM

To:   <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:   "Amir Sadr" <asadr@panalytix.com>
Subject:  B. Brandfass

Hello Vince,

Sorry to be a bother but do you have those materials from your  talk in
May?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank You,

Barbara E. Brandfass, Chief of Business Development
Panalytix, Inc., www.panalytix.com
212 974 1022, b@panalytix.com


Sara,

Moreover, Keegan represented to me that you requested that she locate for you
the Securities Loan Agreement for you while I was out and that she went into
my office and retrieved that document from my Enron Credit Inc. file and gave
it to you.  So, I am not sure of the source of confusion about not being able
to find my file but for future reference, the best thing to do is to ask
Keegan how to contact me immediately and directly - when out the office she
always knows how to reach me.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 10:36 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara:

I will forward the documents to you.

For future reference, if anyone is looking for a file for an urgent matter
while I am out, she should convey that fact to me by either (1) leaving a
voice mail - as I checked my voicemails on Friday (that is how I was able to
speak with Tom from New York on Friday) or (2) advise Keegan and she will
contact me immediately by cell phone as she did regarding other matters on
Friday.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	05/15/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment (increase
from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et al

Cheryl:

I spoke with Clem and he is preparing the amendment for immediate execution
as the signers will be at an offsite tomorrow.  I'll let Tom know as soon as
the amendment has been executed.  Anna Meytina is on vacation so I left a
message with Sharon Chernick.

In order to complete our files with respect to the Enron North America Inc.
("ENA") Securities Loan Agreement, please provide me with copies of the
following documents:

(1)  assignment of the Securities Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI (or was a
separate agreement with ECI executed?)

(2) termination of the prior Enron Corp. guaranty on behalf of ENA in the
amount of  USD25 Million

I spoke with Stephanie and she could not locate your Bear/ECI files on Friday
of last week.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Do you know?
-----Original Message-----
From: FDJN@aol.com [mailto:FDJN@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:33 PM
To: SCorman@enron.com
Subject: (no subject)

Hi Shel,

Did you say that "Flat Stanley" will arrive in a white envelope?  I received
a yellow envelope in the mail today with no return address, my name & address
were typed and it had a "non-profit" stamp on it.  I did not open it.  It's
in the trash can but the garbage man doesn't go 'til Thursday... I can
retrieve it if you think it might be the envelope from Chad.

Love,
Mom


Eva,

I have reviewed the latest draft of the LOU and the document reflects all the
changes with one major exception, the purchase price not reflecting a value
of $204 million.  On Friday morning, I spoke with Mark Whitt and thought we
had come to agreement on a basket of negotiated items, the Purchase Price,
Specified Geographical Area, and Buyer's Rights.  It was my position that
these items were all tied together.  In the subsequent meeting in the
afternoon, you and I participated in a meeting with ENA concerning final
comments on the LOU.  Their earlier meeting with Dave DeLainey was discussed
and nothing was mentioned concerning the purchase price when discussing
changes to the LOU.   Northern Border did bring up the discussion on an
exclusivity clause.  A change in purchase price was not discussed by ENA.

In addition, on Friday afternoon John Jesse and I had a conference call with
Ranabir Dutt and Brian Bierbach concerning the note term sheet.  It was
agreed that Northern Border would pursue a note with its bank syndicate and
rely on ENA in a fallback situation, if John through discussions with bankers
next week gets comfortable with that approach.

I am surprised at $205 million purchase price in ENA's latest LOU and will
talk to Mark about the purchase price on Monday morning before the meeting
with Gulfstar.  If ENA does not agree with the $204,000,000.00 purchase
price, Northern Border will have to make adjustments in the Buyer's Rights
section.  Clauses (i) and (ii) will need to be deleted, as this was agreed to
by Northern Border at a $204 million purchase price.   In addition, this
might affect Northern Borders comfort level in relying on ENA in a fallback
position for a note, as Jerry Peters had expressed some concerns to John and
I regarding this approach.

I will try to call you before 11:00 a.m. on Monday  to give you an update on
this matter.

Paul


Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, November  15, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Murphy, Harlan
Cc:	St. Clair, Carol; Tweed, Sheila; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	dynegy letter re sithe

harlan: for forwarding to dynegy

the framework re the sithe letter:
1.added cross default to master netting agreement.
2.added acceleration of ena's payment obligations in the event of default by enron parties under the master and close-out by the dynegy parties.
3.added set off right to dynegy parties if they end up owing under the master to the remaining payment obligations of ena.

re the master netting agreement which you will send:
1. added cross default to ena's payment obligations under the sithe letter.
2. added set off right to dynegy parties like in 3. above.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

"NW on Linux" <Linux@bdcimail.com> on 04/27/2000 04:57:17 AM
Please respond to "Linux Help" <NWReplies@bellevue.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Getting Linux-certified

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: PHIL HOCHMUTH
on LINUX
Today's focus: Getting Linux-certified
04/26/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

Subscribe to the "Whitepapers Download"
newsletter from Network World!!
Keep up-to-date with summaries and links to the latest vendor-sponsored
whitepapers on Network World Fusion.
Subscribe to Whitepapers Download at
http://www.nwfusion.com/go/wppromo.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's focus: Getting Linux-certified
---------------------------------------------
By Phil Hochmuth

Most networking professionals are probably familiar with certification
programs for various operating systems and technologies. With more
enterprises using Linux, several companies have started to offer Linux
certification and training.

One of the most popular programs is run by - not surprisingly - the top
Linux company, Red Hat. The leading Linux distributor offers training
and certification of its product for network professionals in a program
similar to system-specific certifications such as Certified Novell
Engineer and Microsoft Certified Software Engineer.

Red Hat,s Certified Engineer (RHCE) program is a five-day course that
consists of four one-day labs followed by a certification test taken on
the fifth day. Prerequisites for the course include knowledge of basic
Intel- and Intel clone-based hardware architecture, familiarity with
basic Unix file structure and shell programming, TCP/IP networking
skills and network administration experience. The test can also be
taken on its own, without the four days of labs.

Unlike the widely accessible Microsoft or Novell certification programs,
RHCE courses and tests are only available at Red Hat training
facilities in Durham, N.C., Portland, Ore., San Francisco and Santa
Clara. The course costs $2,498; the test can be taken alone for $749.

Red Hat certification can be valuable for companies investing heavily
in Red Hat Linux as an alternative network operating system, or for IT
professionals looking for a certification feather in their caps.
However, the program has been criticized by some for its poor
accessibility and high cost. The single-distribution focus of the
training has also been at issue with some Linux users looking for
certification options.

For Linux certification and training that isn,t tied to any specific
distribution, the Linux Professional Institute (LPI) has less expensive
certification test offerings.

LPI offers basic, advanced and expert levels of Linux certification.
The beginning level certifies users beyond a basic help desk or
power-user level of knowledge. Prerequisites for this course are equal
to the Red Hat program. The second level requires more in-depth study
for people looking for a system administrator,s level of certification.
The third level is for certification in more advanced and specialized
areas, such as database server administration or kernel and device
driver development. Each level involves two tests, which cost $100 each
to take. Currently, only the requirements for the first level of the
LPI program have been finalized; requirements for the second and third
levels could change in the near future. LPI,s tests are administered
through Virtual University Enterprises, 1,700 test centers worldwide.
Among LPI,s backers are Caldera, SuSE, Linuxcare, IBM and TurboLinux.

Another option for distribution-neutral Linux certification is the Sair
GNU and Linux Certification program. Similar to the LPI model, the
program offers three levels of certification: Linux Certified
Administrator (LCA) for basic administrative-level certification; Linux
Certified Engineer (LCE) for advanced system managers; and Master Linux
Certified Engineer (MLCE) for senior systems managers. Four tests are
required for each level of certification, with LCA, LCE and MLCE
programs currently available. Certification tests cost $99 each and can
be taken at 2,000 Sylvan Prometric testing centers worldwide.

To contact Phil Hochmuth:
-------------------------
Phil Hochmuth is a writer and researcher for Network World, and
a former systems integrator. You can reach him at
mailto:phochmut@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find out more about Red Hat, LPI and SAIR certification programs:

Red Hat Training:
http://www.redhat.com/services/training/training.html

LPI:
http://www.LPI.org

Linux Certification:
http://www.linuxcertification.com

Find the testing and certification resources for Linux and other
technologies:

Virtual University:
http://www.vue.com

Linux nerds:
http://www.linuxnerds.com

SAGE Certification:
http://www.usenix.org/sage/cert

Archive of Network World Fusion Focus on Linux newsletters:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/linux/

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered at your
fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by receiving 51 FREE
issues to our print publication. Apply today at
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,go
to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to This
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


With ECS (Enron Center South) rapidly approaching completion, Enron is forced to change the numbering scheme on the existing Stentofon system.  To increase our capacity to support this expansion, we must increase the number of valid Stentofon address numbers.  Enron currently uses 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 and 900 series numbers for the addresses.  In order to add more addresses to the system, Enron will be converting the dial plan from a three digit dialing system to a four digit dialing scheme on the Stentofon system.  This conversion is scheduled to occur on the weekend of May 18th.

In efforts to minimize confusion, we will convert all Stentofon addresses in EB1 to a 4000 series number.    (i.e.  If your Stento number was 364, then your new number will be 4364.)  We will also change all speed dials to reflect the new dialing scheme.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

Regards,
Darren Adamik
Mgr.-Trading Technology
Enron Net Works, LLC
713.853.4764 Office
713-853-9828 Fax
mailto:darren.p.adamik@enron.com


have we ever agreed to this (charge interest for different Payment Dates)
for early payments (i.e., earlier than our usual 5 days after the Floating
Price is determinable)?  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/27/99 03:32
PM ---------------------------

Melba Lozano
07/27/99 03:02 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Michael Petroleum - Payment Date(s)

Sara,

Attached is a draft of the language that needs to be placed in all Michael
Petroleum deals.  Janelle agreed with the counterparty that they will settle
on the last day of the calendar month instead of our usual 5th Business Day.
She is charging 6.5 % annual interest on payments they make to us for the
days beyond the 5th Business Day.

I__________________________________________________________________I
(5th B.D.)       6.5% interest
..............................................................................
....    (last B.D.)

Please let me know as soon as you can if this is ok. to put in the
confirmations.  Call me if you need me to go up there.

THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!

Melba


Vince,
I'd like to purchase some copies of the XPRESS LP solver for the gas storage
optimization model.  We have previously discussed the purchase of CPLEX, but
after trialing both systems, have found some worthwhile advantages with
XPRESS.  If others find Planner / CPLEX best suited to their application, I
see no problem is their use of a different system - both have strengths, and
it is likely that I would use Planner/CPLEX myself on some future project if
we were to have both systems available.

XPRESS is particularly suited to my application because it handles Special
Ordered Sets.  This is a very efficient way of representing the storage
ratchets as the integer search process is able to use the extra information
provided by the set, rather than just using binary integer variables to
represent the ratchets.

Planner is a C++ interface for CPLEX.  It has some significant limitations,
and does not permit access to all CPLEX features.

Dash Optimization have made the following offer:
All software purchases made by Enron this year will be at 30% off the list
price - we do not need to make a single purchase of any specific quantity of
licenses to obtain this discount.
90 days of full maintenance services will be provided with the purchase.
The EMOSL utility will be provided at no cost.
The XBSL system will be provided at no cost when it is released in a few
weeks time.

For the Gas Storage Optimization model, I would like to purchase:
One development license, hyper version, with modeller, primal/dual simplex,
MIP search, dlls, EMOSL and XBSL when available.
 List price $10,000  Discounted price  $7,000
Two run time licenses for above,
 List price total $8,000    Discounted price  $5,600
     Total cost  $12,600

I've used the usually security request system to set the purchase process
going, should you agree to this.

Tom.


Tana - I may have sent you a spreadsheet that did not include options and
physical trades.  Attached is the complete list.  My mistake - I too have a
tendency to forget the "other" trades. - Anita


I'm going to a Unitariean church on Sunday.  Not happy about it either.

Jerry W Germany <germanj@basf-corp.com> on 04/27/2001 12:55:59 PM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Hye

I'm off Sunday if you need help....

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/27/2001 09:40:27 AM
To:   Jerry W Germany
cc:
Subject:  Hye

Guess I won't need you tonight.  My woman and I are going to a movie.


Just went to make sure that Christine was in Personic so that we could schedule her to come in.  She applied on her own to us through our website on 10/1/01.  According to the emails I have received, Lee Allbritton submitted her resume on 10/9/01.  Under normal circumstances, we (Enron) would already "own" this candidate, and we would not be willing to pay any fee to the agency.

How would you like us to handle this?  I would be more than happy to call Lee and explain if that's the route you choose.  I didn't know what kind of relationship you had with him, or if you even wanted to mention this to him.

I'll wait to hear from either or both of you before we move forward with contacting either the candidate or Lee.

Molly

Lisa:  Let's hold off on scheduling her until we receive a response on this question.

Thanks,
Molly


Hi Guys (aka FC TBA),

I thought you might like a copy of the Portland Indoor Schedule.  Here are
the remaining 7 games including tonight's game.

MON JUN 11   9:15 PM    THUNDER!         vs    FC TBA
WED JUN 20  10:15 PM    EINTRACHT ROACH  vs    FC TBA
MON JUN 25   6:15 PM    ROWDIES          vs    FC TBA
THU JUL  5   8:15 PM    FC TBA           vs    IMPALAS
THU JUL 12   9:15 PM    FC TBA           vs    CARVE....
MON JUL 16   8:15 PM    FC TBA           vs    STICK BUILT
WED JUL 25   7:15 PM    BALLERSS         vs    FC TBA

THU AUG  2   9:15 PM    #1 vs #2 CHAMPIONSHIP GAME

Here is a link to the Portland Indoor in case you loose your schedule or
want to know the standings:

http://pdxindoorsoccer.com/index2.htm

Jon


Gas and coal article interesting...

Indigestion
Daniel Fisher, Forbes Magazine, 10.29.01

All those new natural gas-fired electric plants mean more gas demand, right? Maybe not.
For natural gas bulls, there was never a surer sign of good times to come than the order book at General Electric Corp. Backlogs in GE's Power Systems group almost tripled to $25 billion in the late 1990s as scores of utilities and freestanding power producers ordered natural gas turbines to supply the nation's growing appetite for electricity. Gas demand had to go up as all those shiny new turbines were connected to the grid.

Ah, but there was a flaw in that argument--one that is becoming glaringly clear as the price of gas plunges below $2 per million Btu at the wellhead from as high as $10 last year. (A million Btu of gas equals just about 1,000 cubic feet.) Those new gas plants were supposed to steal business from pollution-spewing coal units, which still supply half the nation's electricity. But in a painstaking study of 788 power plants that supply the bulk of U.S. electricity, Charles Studness, president of Studness Research, found quite the opposite could happen.

Studness determined that 79% of the "new" electricity supplied to the grid over the past five years came from existing plants, mostly coal-fired units. And there's plenty more where that came from. Studness figures existing coal plants have the potential to increase output by 50 million megawatt-hours a year for the next five years, representing about half the expected 2.5%-a-year increase in demand.

Coal's advantage over gas: It's cheap. Utilities paid an average of $1.20 per million Btu for coal last year, compared with $4.30 for gas (delivered). Even with depressed gas prices, many coal plants are still cheaper to operate. So while those new turbines being installed by Calpine (nyse: CPN - news - people) and other independent power producers, (see table, below) will burn a lot of gas, they will do it mostly at the expense of older gas plants that burn half again as much.

Addressing a Burning Issue
If natural gas prices stay down or merely remain volatile it will help companies that burn, trade or store gas and hurt those that sell it or provide equipment to the industry. Overleveraged gas producers and service companies could have trouble making it through the downturn.

WINNERS  			Sales* ($bil) 	Remarks
Calpine 				$4.6 		Its gas power plants won't compete with coal for years
Chesapeake Energy 		0.9 		Hedged gas production through December 2003
Dynegy 			43.4 		Owns gas, coal power plants; stores, trades gas
Peabody Energy 		2.7 		World's largest coal company

LOSERS  			Sales* ($bil) 	Remarks
Devon Energy 			3.3 Gas-heavy; 	$8 billion in ...debt
General Electric 		129.5 		Sells gas turbines
Pioneer Natural Resources 	1.0 		$1.5 billion in ...debt; 53% of production is gas
Transocean SedcoForex 	1.9 		$4 billion in debt; heavy gas-drilling exposure

*Latest 12 months. Source: Market Guide via FactSet Research Systems.

"It's not our game to compete with coal or nuclear," says Ron A. Walter, senior vice president of San Jose, Calif.-based Calpine, which plans over the next few years to build gas-fired plants totaling 31,500 megawatts. "It's our game to displace older gas."

Combined-cycle gas turbines, which use hot exhaust gases from one turbine to generate steam to turn a second one, can transform 6,800 Btu of gas into a kilowatt-hour of electricity, enough to light one lightbulb for ten hours. The oldest gas plants burn as much as 13,000 Btu, and the national average is 10,500. Substitute enough new plants for old, and U.S. gas consumption, currently 62 billion cubic feet a day, could drop by as much as 1 billion cubic feet a day.

That scenario sounds unlikely to Stephen Bergstrom, president of Houston-based Dynegy, an energy-trading firm that also owns both coal- and gas-fired power plants. Dynegy's 35-year-old coal plants are "huge capital hogs," Bergstrom says, that cost ten times as much to maintain as modern gas units. Throw in the cost of scrubbers and other required pollution controls, and many smaller coal plants will have to be shut down, Bergstrom says.

But coal-plant owners can be ingenious. Witness Midwest Generation, a nonregulated subsidiary of Edison International that bought six coal plants from troubled Commonwealth Edison of Chicago in 1999. By changing operating procedures and burning a higher grade of coal, Midwest boosted output from the 40-year-old plants 12% last year--while reducing emissions. John Long, vice president and chief technical officer of the Midwest Generation unit, thinks he can coax another 15% increase out of those aging boilers over the next five years without running afoul of environmental rules.

Long term, the bullish scenario still holds: Gas will displace coal. In the meantime, gas producers have a lot of bonds to retire.