This is fully consistent with what we are communicating throughout the organization

-----Original Message-----
From: Bland Jr., Ted C.
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:32 AM
To: Lemmons Jr., Billy; Warner, Traci; Sherriff, John; Kean, Steven J.
Subject: RE: DRAFT - A/A Program Recruiting and Travel

Billy - I concour and agree with John's comments.  Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: Lemmons Jr., Billy
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 10:38 PM
To: Warner, Traci; Bland Jr., Ted C.; Sherriff, John; Kean, Steven J.
Subject: DRAFT - A/A Program Recruiting and Travel

Please give me your thoughts on this.  I've had a few questions so far, and I think alot of people are wondering about this.  I would send it to the Executive Leads for each school, the Program Department in Houston and the HR Leads.  Steve - I'd like your opinion to be sure that I'm consistent with our corporate position.

Thanks,
Billy
___________________

The purpose of this note is to update you on travel related to the recruiting efforts of the Program.

Over the weekend, President Bush asked all Americans to resume their activities, but to do so with the heightened awareness that the country is now at war with terrorists and with any country that supports their activities.  Enron's current position is that employees should avoid all non-essential business travel.  With these things in mind, and for the safety of our employees, I very strongly encourage you to consider alternatives to business travel for recruiting activities.

Earlier this year, we made the decision to emphasize real-time and direct recruiting methods, which by their design require less time and presence on campus.  I would now ask that each executive lead and recruiter carefully review their campus schedule / strategy and consider modifications.  Technology has given us the opportunity to use tools like video conferencing, telephone interviews, email, and CD based resume books.  The focusing benefits of these tools can signficantly decrease the number of people required for on-campus presentations and interviews, and in some cases may even eliminate the need for these activities.  In addition to the primary concern of safety, a major disruption to the travel grid like that which occurred last week could strand critical Enron business personnel in relatively remote locations.

Later this week we will make a decision regarding participation in the National Black MBA Conference in Orlando, Florida.

If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 36671.

Best regards,
Billy Lemmons


Sorry, but this is funny . . .
http://auburn.nu/board/display.cgi?read=236745


you guys like the worst places.  wild wild west, surf side sally's.  please
tell me that the party won't end up at "shock 2000: the radioactive dance
factory".  just let me know the plans & i will be there.


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000697403, Customer called to check the status of a check for an expense report

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000004881


Are you and Mark unavailable?  I probably cannot represent her, but can ask
John Novak.  You will need to coordinate with John prior to the PRC.

Side question to Diana Perez: Is it even appropriate for Andrea to be
reviewed by the ESA Regional PRC (when she is part of ENA)? What is being
done on the business side in similar circumstances?

Randy

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/01/2000 09:45 PM
To: TRandyYoung/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ACalo

Randy, would you be able to represent Andrea at the Business Unit PRC in Sao
Paulo?
Thanks,
Brent

TRandyYoung@ENRON
01/06/2000 04:17 PM
To: Diana Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Fernanda
Fernandes/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor@ECT
Subject: Re: ACalo

She is a Senior Counsel.  Consistent with our conversation earlier this week,
I would place her at the director level.

Diana Perez@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/01/2000 01:11 PM
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Fernanda
Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: ACalo

OK...thanks, Brent is the Supervisor, Mark is the PRC rep for the functional
meeting in Houston and we have the Business Unit PRC in Sao Paulo...I will
assume Brent that you will represent Andrea.
Is she a  manager level or director?

thanks,
diana

Brent Hendry
06/01/2000 08:48 AM
To: Diana Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: ACalo

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/06/2000 10:47 AM ---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 30/05/2000 03:05 PM CDT
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: ACalo

In this case, I would view you as Andrea's supervisor and I would be her
representative at the PRC which would be here in Houston.

	Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/29/2000 06:27 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ACalo

Aren't you technically the Supervisor of Andrea?  What would be her PRC?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
29/05/2000 08:26 AM ---------------------------

Diana Perez
25/05/2000 02:30 PM
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: ACalo

Pls advise who is the Supervisor and PRC for Andrea Calo.

thanks,
diana


yah.  the brutal part is that i'm sure those planes are no where near full.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

that's brutal dude.  if we would have thought of this last week, they played
Sacramento on the 20th and Phoenix on the 23rd.  Motherfucker.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:30 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

looks like its 2 Gs to go to kansas city or st louis.  too far to miami,
etc.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 26, 2001 9:18 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:

   http://www.u2.com/u2.html <http://www.u2.com/u2.html>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Here are possible Q's.  Dan W. will prepare first cut at answers.

Questions for January 31 Hearing

Price Gouging
?   On January 22, your company reported fourth-quarter results for
2000, in which you showed that profits from your energy trading unit rose
256 percent and your overall earnings rose 34 percent.  How much of this was
attributable to increased sales in California?  How much did you make from
sales in California?
?   What is the highest per kilowatt-hour price Enron charged on the
spot market?  What is the cost of production for that power?
?   In a recent Houston Chronicle article (January 23, 2001), Mr.
Skilling, your CEO was quoted as saying that not only had the California
situation not had an impact on earnings, but that "it may even turn out to
be a benefit in the long run."  Can you please explain the long-term
benefits you expect?
?   In a recent New York Times column by Paul Krugman, Ken Lay was
quoted as saying that California consumers "need to see the price signals
that is, pay much more and start modifying behavior to reduce demand until
we get more supplies."  What did Mr. Lay mean by this?  With the tremendous
profits that Enron is making in this situation, isn't it pretty brazen for
him to be suggesting that California consumers should pay more for their
power?

Market Manipulation
?   A number of generators and wholesalers, including Enron, have been
accused of withholding energy to drive up energy prices in the Western
states.  I understand that you are being sued in state court in San
Francisco for such activities and an independent monitor has supported these
allegations.  Does Enron currently have any generation assets off-line for
maintenance?  Did Enron make all of its generated power in the Western
states available for purchase by California utilities?  If not, why did it
withhold power?  How much did you withhold or sell in other states despite
knowing of the crisis in California?
?   At the time that the spot market collapsed and two of California's
largest utilities were teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, what price was
Enron asking for its power on the spot market?  What was Enron's cost of
producing that power?  How much profit did you make in December from sales
in California?
?   Did Enron ever refuse to sell power to a California utility because
of concerns about their credit worthiness?  Did your company ever tell
California utilities that it would not sell power to them because of credit
concerns?
?   Do you believe that Enron has any responsibility as a corporation in
a crisis such as occurred in California?  How do you justify making such
large profits, driving the utilities into bankruptcy and then refusing to
sell power to those same utilities because of their credit worthiness?

Utility Forbearance & Auction
?   California clearly has a significant problem with the potential
bankruptcy of two of its largest utilities.  How much money do those
utilities owe your company?  Has your company offered any payment
forbearance or forgiveness in light of the excessive prices that you were
charging them on the spot market for power?
?   California held an Internet auction last week for long-term
contracts for sale of power to the state.  Did Enron participate in the
auction?  What price did you offer for power in non-peak times?  What price
did you bid for power during peaking periods?
?   Your company has successfully gouged the utilities in California for
power on the spot market because long-term contracts were discouraged.  Now,
you are looking to enter into long-term contracts, which many experts
believe will be at rates far above the market in the future.  You really are
going to profit coming and going.  How can you claim that you are not price
gouging in this case?
?   In the past, you have offered power to California utilities in
long-term contracts at rates less than $.06 per kilowatt-hour.  How do you
justify previously offering power at much lower rates and now saying that
you are unable to provide it for less than a much higher price?

Role in California Deregulation
?   Your company was supportive of the California deregulation efforts
and has been a leading supporter of deregulation nationwide.  In light of
the "colossal failure" of the effort in California, do you still support
deregulation in other states or at the federal level?  What safeguards would
you support to protect against increased rates for consumers?

The Future
?   California is likely to enact a legislative fix to address this
problem.  What do you think will happen this summer during peak demand
periods?  Is there another crisis in the making in California or in other
states such as New York?

Political Contributions & Activities
?   Your company has been very active politically and according to press
reports, Mr. Lay is very close to President Bush.  Wasn't your company one
of the biggest donors to the Bush Campaign and the Inaugural Committee?  How
much money did your company contribute in soft money to the Bush Campaign
and the RNC?  How much money did your executives give in personal money to
the Bush Campaign and the RNC?  How much to the inaugural?
?   Has anyone from Enron participated in the Bush transition teams or
the so-called "advisory committees?"
?   What information and suggestions has your company or its officials
provided to the transition team or the new Administration regarding energy
deregulation or the California situation?
?   What discussions have officials from your company had with
Administration or Transition officials about the California situation?

Softball Questions

?   In the short term and then in the long term, what can California do
to fix its power supply system?
?   What do you believe are the flaws in the current California system?
The Power Exchange?  The Independent System Operator?
?   Why did deregulation fail in California?
?   Some people, including Governor Davis, have suggested that
out-of-state power suppliers, such as Enron, are to blame for this crisis,
is that true?
?   Some people in California have suggested that the State should take
over the power system.  Please comment on this proposal.  Is this a good
idea?
?   In which states has deregulation worked?  How do you explain the
success in those states in contrast with the failures in California?
?   This Committee will likely consider deregulation legislation at some
point in the future.  Should we undertake this effort?


bob b.
464138
should be 6x8, 1x24


Here are the waiver/notification letters to be forwarded to the CA State
Fire Marshall (for aboveground liquid pipeline waiver) and to the US DOT
Office of Pipeline Safety (for notification and aboveground waiver for
natural gas).  I have sent these as Word docs, let me know if you need a
different format.  Each package should include the attached project
description, figures (site location, aboveground installation), and
construction specs.  The Helt drawings that Ed Purcell put together should
be fine, you may want to highlight the proposed aboveground sections.  Kenny
has all the work specs and plans, which I believe the State Fire Marshall
already has copies.  Let me know if you need anything else.

 <<DOT-OPS notification letter.doc>>    <<State Fire Marshall - Waiver
Letter.doc>>

 - DOT-OPS notification letter.doc
 - State Fire Marshall - Waiver Letter.doc


There will be a Q & A Meeting for the Power & Gas Market Team.  This meeting will take place today @ 11:00 AM in ESC 6980.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Americas
(713) 853-6143


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041609.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 9 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Per the Counterparty, "The" has been added as part of the Legal Name for The
Hour Publishing Company.
"Inc." is not part of it's Legal Name. The GCP System has been modified
accordingly.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
ENW_GCP

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 09:45
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           03/22/2001 06:37 PM

To: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken
Curry/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Click Paper Approvals, 03-20-01 _ GCP Response

GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
ENW_GCP

From: Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/20/2001 10:06 AM
To: Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Click Paper Approvals, 03-20-01

Please see attached. Ammendments are highlighted in purple. Thanks.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


[IMAGE] [IMAGE]    KEEP MORE OF YOUR HARD-EARNED CASH!   STOP paying outrageous finance charges and fees on  your debt!    Slash you  credit card debt & interest by 50%!    Lower and  simplify monthly payments!    Eliminate  late charges and over-the-limit fees    Re-age past  due accounts to improve credit rating     This is not a loan, there is no credit check or property  required and it is completely FREE!     Click  Here to GET STARTED!    Sign up today and let this reputable Non-Profit help you  quickly and easily end your debt problems! Click  Here for this free limited-time offer!

Please allow at least 48 hours for your unsubscribe requests to be processed.
Remove yourself from this list by either:
Entering your email address below and clicking REMOVE:
OR
 Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
 This message was sent to address dfarmer@ect.enron.com  pmguid:ud.xdb.e642i  pmg


When: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

1. Contractors
2. Pulse Survey program and recommendations (Frank)
3. Orientation Program


Enjoy!
 - 20020128ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20020128ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


MESSAGE FROM GREG PORTER

________________________________________________
As you know, Transwestern filed a complaint against Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on September 28, 2001.  The complaint asked FERC to find SoCalGas' refusal to pay the tariff commodity rate constitutes a violation of Transwestern's tariff and the 1995 Global Settlement.  SoCalGas filed an Answer on October 18, 2001.  In summary, SoCalGas' Answer stated:

1.	SoCalGas did not affirmatively agree to pay the stated tariff rate during the Global Settlement.

2.	The commodity charge SoCal has been paying is consistent with the course of performance/conduct prior to, and after, the Global Settlement.

3.	Since the Global Settlement has been in effect, SoCalGas has relied on the commodity/usage charges that Transwestern has billed.

4.	SoCalGas claims they had been paying the appropriate rate and that Transwestern failed to include the correct rate in its tariff; such omission has created ambiguity and any ambiguity should be construed against the drafter of the tariff, Transwestern.

5.	If the Commission disagrees with SoCalGas and declines to reject the complaint outright, any retroactive billing adjustment should be limited to a six-month period.

6.	SoCalGas admits that a retroactive billing adjustment for the escalation factor for six months is reasonable and an escalation factor going forward for the remaining term of its Contract No. 8255 is appropriate.

In addition to the foregoing statements, SoCalGas provided that it, like Transwestern, was interested in resolving this matter through ADR.  Accordingly, we will be coordinating with SoCalGas and FERC's ADR group to explore possible ADR procedures.

We will advise as new developments warrant.  In the meantime, should you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (402) 398-7406 or Maria Pavlou at (402) 398-7097.


>From: Southwest Airlines Vacations <especials@specials.swavacations.com>
>To: mtaylo9@LSU.EDU
>Subject: Friends Fly Free on Ski Vacations
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:40:45 -0500
>
>Southwest Airlines Vacations weekly e-mail update
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>A Message to our Customers:
>
>Southwest Airlines Vacations remains committed to providing safe,
>dependable, and affordable vacation travel for our Customers.
>
>From all of us at Southwest Airlines Vacations, we would LUV
>to help you plan your next vacation soon.
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>Important Travel Information
>
>For important information needed prior to traveling, including new
>FAA carryon baggage limitations, please visit
>http://www.swavacations.com/splash.htm
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>This week's e-mail features:
>
>I.	Friends Fly FREE on Ski Vacations
>II.	Las Vegas Vacation SALE
>III.	Travel Protection Plans
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>I.	FRIENDS FLY FREE ON SKI VACATIONS
>
>Friends Fly Free on ski packages to Utah, Lake Tahoe, New Mexico,
>and Durango, CO when you book by Dec. 20, 2001, for travel as follows:
>
>Utah:
>Valid for travel Dec. 1-Dec. 13, 2001 and Jan. 5-Jan. 31, 2002.
>
>Lake Tahoe, New Mexico, and Durango:
>Valid for travel Dec. 1-Dec. 13, 2001, Jan. 5-Feb. 14, and
>Feb. 19-Feb. 28, 2002.
>
>Create a complete ski vacation including roundtrip air, hotel/condo
>accommodations, lift tickets, ground transportation, Rapid Rewards
>credit, and 24-hour traveler assistance by visiting
>http://www.swavacations.com/friendsfly.htm
>
>Southwest Airlines' current flight schedule is open through
>Jan. 11, 2002.
>
>The following applies to this sale:
>- Offer valid for one free Friend's air fare with the purchase of
>   a full two-night or longer air and hotel ski package.
>- Free air fare valid for air travel on Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, or
>   Sat on or during dates listed above.
>- One person in each party must be 18 years of age or older.
>- Fare does not include federal excise tax of up to $3 per takeoff and
>   landing per fare paying Customer or airport taxes of up to $18
>   roundtrip per person.
>- Offer valid on air portion of complete vacation package only.
>- You and your Friend must check in and travel together on the
>   same flights.
>- Both traveling parties may receive Rapid Rewards credit for flights
>   if membership cards are shown at checkin.
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>II.	LAS VEGAS ON SALE
>
>Enjoy savings on a complete Las Vegas air/hotel package.
>
>Special, reduced vacation prices are available when you purchase
>by Oct. 31, 2001, for travel Nov. 1-Nov. 10, Nov. 26-Dec. 22, 2001,
>or Jan. 5-Jan. 11, 2002, and stay at one of these participating
>hotels:
>
>  -Circus Circus Hotel/Casino-Tower
>  -Excalibur Hotel/Casino
>  -Golden Nugget
>  -Imperial Palace
>  -MGM Grand-Emerald Tower
>  -New York-New York Hotel and Casino Las Vegas
>  -Stratosphere Tower, Hotel and Casino
>  -Treasure Island at The Mirage
>  -The Mirage
>  -Westward Ho Casino-Rear
>
>Reduced prices are available for travel from all scheduled
>Southwest Airlines Vacations origin markets excluding
>Orange County, CA.
>
>Sample two-night vacation prices are listed below.  Sample prices
>are per person, based on double occupancy for Sun-Wed departures
>during dates listed above and include:
>
>   -Roundtrip air via Southwest Airlines
>   -Two nights hotel accommodations
>   -Hotel Taxes
>   -Rapid Rewards credit
>   -24-Hour Traveler Assistance
>
>Origin City		Per Person Price	Per Person Price
>			at Stratosphere		at Golden Nugget
>San Diego 		from $99		from $119
>Oakland 		from $109		from $149
>Nashville 		from $124 		from $154
>El Paso			from $144		from $174
>Seattle			from $174		from $204
>Amarillo	 	from $199		from $214
>
>To Price and Buy a Las Vegas vacation package from your origin city,
>visit http://www.swavacations.com/vegas.htm
>
>The following applies to this Las Vegas sale:
>- Savings will be reflected in complete vacation package price
>- Packages must be booked no later than four business days prior to
>   departure
>- Seats are limited and may not be available on some flights that
>   operate during peak travel times and holiday periods
>
>The following applies to prices listed above:
>- Prices do not include a federal excise tax of up to $3 per takeoff
>   and landing
>- Prices do not include airport taxes of up to $18 roundtrip
>- Prices quoted are examples, per person, based on double occupancy
>- Prices are valid for Sun-Wed departures during dates listed above
>   only
>- Rates may be higher for other days of the week
>- Surcharges apply to weekends, holidays, special events, and
>   convention periods
>- Rates are subject to change until purchased
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>II.	TRAVEL PROTECTION PLANS
>
>You can protect your vacation plans by purchasing the Cancellation
>Penalty Waiver with your complete package.  The Cancellation Penalty
>Waiver is just $30 per person and protects you from penalties if
>you choose to cancel your travel arrangements prior to your scheduled
>outbound departure date.
>
>For more information, visit:
>http://www.swavacations.com/FIDD/CPW20.HTM?>?>______________________________________________________________________?>?>Please share this great vacation information with your friends.?>To subscribe to our weekly e-mail specials, visit?>http://www.swavacations.com/espec/espec.htm?>______________________________________________________________________?>?>The Mark Travel Corportaion is the tour operator for?>Southwest Airlines Vacations.?>_______________________________________________________________________?>?>If you wish to unsubscribe from these e-mail specials please visit:?>http://www.swavacations.com/unsub.htm?>?>?>OT: mtaylo9@LSU.EDU???_________________________________________________________________?Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Hi Sweetie,

Hopefully the visit to the Dr won't be that bad, do you want me to come hold your hand? (That would be pushing the envelope on intimacy, eh?) I saw a wrapper in the trash this morning and was sad to see it there. You need to fix that ( or those as it were). Please let me know what the dr. says.

The movie sounds good, but we will see how tired you are when you get home.  I wouldn't mind laying around like a turd this evening either. I need to vacuum but that is all.

I love you, and am so glad that I make you happy. I want us to be happy together for many years to come. I still feel like the luckiest woman in the world, to have such a caring and loving man in my life so suddenly.

See you tonight,

C


Sounds familiar.  Isn't that what Butch said prior to taking the Browns' job?

Phillip M Love
01/30/2001 01:05 PM
To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tuberville

Here is an article for all you LSU boys who kept saying Tuberville was
leaving.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
12:58 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Guggenheim                           01/30/2001 12:55 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/news/2001/01/30/tuberville_m
iami_ap/


I have an extra I can send you today.

Kay

Humberto Cubillos-Uejbe@ECT
08/22/2000 10:36 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Transformers Purchase Contract

Kay:

Do you have a copy of the signed Transformers Purchase contract ? I need to
get a hold of one to input in our economic model.
Please let me know if you have it and if so if you can send me a copy to EB
2870D. Thank you very much, Humberto


um, how about next door

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know, where do you have in mind

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

it will probably take me until then, so where should we meet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm going to shoot for 3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

what time do you think

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you're going to be done before I can get off

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i think now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know...when are you getting your haircut?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

so i have to go get my haircut, any ideas where we can meet


Attached are proposed deal terms for Devon Energy.

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


All "in-person" meetings will be in EB609, sorry for the missing info.


Veronica,
 The form of the Guaranty is okay.  Please have them correct the name "Enron
North America Corp." in the first paragraph.

	Veronica Espinoza@ENRON
	11/14/2000 03:56 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: South Jersey Resources--Gty

Dan--

Please review this Guaranty draft (as it covers physical business).  We need
to have the Gty executed ASAP, so I would appreciate your quick response.

 - appSJRGAPC1100EnronNA.doc

Thanks again,

Veronica


Broker is correct. Chris entered the wrong price. I'll change it to 370 when
Risk is done calcing.

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/21/2000 01:35 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

483948

broker has 370.00


Brant,  please follow up with Dynegy, Aquila, and Duke before Tuesday's
meeting.

From: Sara Shackleton on 07/21/2000 08:15 AM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Top Tens

Looking ahead to our meeting on Tuesday, there are three Canadian Top Tens
without any credit activity.  Can we delete these?  Legal cannot move forward
without credit's response.  Thanks.  Sara


Hey Shorty,

How is your day going?  Hopefully, it is going well.  Let me know when you
think you will be free tonight to go home, relax and then be ready to head
out.  I will make the reservations accordingly.  I'll talk to you later.

Ted


sounds good just let me know

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/09/2001 12:40:21 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Re:Mandell

I called and left a message for Huldy for a 2:30 appt.  Dad and I are going
to a movie so I won't be here for a few hours.  I'll call and try for a 2:00
at Mandell.  O.k. with you?  LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Re:Mandell

>
> we can hold off on seeing the w alabama house.  just let me know about the
> time for tomorrow
>
> e
>
>
>
>
> "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/09/2001 08:34:43 AM
>
> Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
>
> To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
>
>
> Good deal.  I think you'll like Bob but, like Dad said, don't feel
> obligated.  Don't forget to put the contracts in a folder/envelope and
> bring
> them along.  How many copies did you make?  I'll call the realtors and see
> about tomorrow.  Did you want to see 400 W. Alabama again?  It's usually
> open on Sunday. LU-M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Re:Mandell
>
>
> >
> > Hey Mom,
> > I would like to see the Mandell and the Huldy - preferably tomorrow
> before
> > 4ish.  Let me know if that works for you.  Dad is welcome to see
> whichever
> > houses he would like.
> >
> > FYI, I am meeting with Bob Dunn today after work, and I made copies of
> the
> > contracts.
> >
> > L,
> > E
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/09/2001 06:43:42 AM
> >
> > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> >
> > To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
> >
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Do you want me to check with the realtors to see if those houses are
open
> > this weekend and, if not, do you want me to make appts.?  Let me know.
> > I'll
> > do that today.  I would like Dad to see Mandell but that's up to you.
He
> > can't do it today, I don't think.  But, if you would like to see
> something
> > today, I'll try to arrange it.  I would prefer to see all of them the
> same
> > day but I will leave the up to you.  I didn't want you to think that I
> have
> > forgotten about you.  Did you download the contract and make copies?
> LU-M
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re:Mandell
> >
> >
> > >
> > > no i haven't driven by yet.  i would like to see the mandell house
> again
> > > before putting a contract in on it.
> > >
> > > -e
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 02:45:35 PM
> > >
> > > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > >
> > > To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
> > >
> > >
> > > Did you drive by Huldy?  If so, what did you think?
> > >
> > > We can do a contract whenever you want.  Did you call B. Dunn?
> > >
> > > Talk to you later.  Love, Mom
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > > To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 11:11 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Re:Mandell
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am fine with seeing more houses before buying but was thinking
that
> > it
> > > > might be a good idea to get the ball rolling on the Mandell house
> (i.e.
> > > low
> > > > ball contract). This does not mean that I am wanting to buy right
> away,
> > > but
> > > > more of testing the market and resolve of sellers.  Let me know when
> > you
> > > > are available to see more houses.  I am free whenever, except for
> > > Saturday
> > > > after around 4 pm.
> > > >
> > > > L,
> > > > E
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/07/2001 10:19:51 AM
> > > >
> > > > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > > >
> > > > To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> > > > cc:   "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
> > > > Subject:  Re: Re:Mandell
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's been so long since we talked, I don't know what I'm supposed to
> be
> > > > doing.
> > > >
> > > > Just finished real estate school and learned a few things - well, my
> > > memory
> > > > was refreshed.  Re: precertification for a loan.  A non-committal
> > > response
> > > > from an online source does not mean that you are precertified.  And,
> > you
> > > > must be real careful about all conditions relating to said loan.
Dad
> > > > thinks
> > > > you should call Bob Dunn (call Dad for number.).  Bob is in the
> > mortgage
> > > > business and is a good guy to have on your side.  His office is near
> > San
> > > > Felipe and Voss.  You should probably get this ball rolling so you
> are
> > > > ready, don't you think?
> > > >
> > > > I am busy today but let me know if you want to see anything Friday.
> We
> > > > could wait until the weekend to see what's open and make appts. for
> > > > whatever
> > > > else you want to see.  I recommend that you see a few more before
> > making
> > > an
> > > > offer but that is up to you.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what I can do.  LU-M
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > > > To: <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:11 AM
> > > > Subject: Re:Mandell
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Any news?
> > > > >
> > > > > -e
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Thx for the spreadsheet.   2 questions : What time frame does this entail and
does the correlation between the trader and AGG GAS include that trader's
contribution to the floor's P&L.  In other words, is my P&L correlated with
the floor or is it correlated to the rest of the floor absent me?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Frank Hayden @ ENRON                           09/19/2000 02:41 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/03/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Elaine Concklin
	08/02/2000 05:27 PM

To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Virginia O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dea
Crum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Judy
Kudym/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie
McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rosemary Gracey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Wehring/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David
Clements/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen
Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike Zabawa/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Henry
Baker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kleb/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sophie
Patel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Please see Henry's note below.

Thanks!  Elaine

---------------------- Forwarded by Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron on 08/02/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Henry Baker                           08/02/2000 04:02 PM

To: Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron
cc:

Subject: Preliminary 2001-2003 Business Plan and Assumptions

Attached are the preliminary 2001 - 2003 Business Plan and Assumption
schedules for NNG and TW.  Please review and update these schedules for the
2001 - 2003 Operating and Strategic Plan.  Keep in mind that these are the
preliminary assumptions that we will discuss in more detail during the
meeting on August 11th.  Please note that the attached Business Plan is a
high level version of the Focus Areas included in the detailed ET&S Business
Plan that was approved by the officers back in March.  Please provide us with
any updates/revisions by Wednesday, August 9th.  If you have any questions,
please give Henry Baker a call at (713) 853-4797 or Elaine Concklin at (713)
853-5521.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.


Filing of H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.), Inc.'s Supplemental Protest and Motion
to Lodge.  HQUS made this filing to lodge with the FERC  correspondence with
Northeast Power Coordinating Council that, in their opinion, clearly permits
a control area to meet its operating reserve requirements through external
transactions.  At issue  in the case is whether NEPOOL's refusal to use
resources external to New England to supply reserve is required by NERC or
NPCC rules.


This was too choice not to pass on.  Whadda guy.  Happy birthday, by the
way.  You ageing beauty, you.  I do want to catch up on lots of stuff but my
current schedule is extremely hectic.  Do you have schedule constraints?
Coffee some morning good for you?  G.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schmid, Elena <ESchmid@caiso.com>
To: 'gcoe@firstworld.net' <gcoe@firstworld.net>
Date: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: FW: Fessler Fesses Up to What Went Wrong in California

>FYI
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alaywan, Ziad
>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:45 PM
>> To: Winter, Terry; Schmid, Elena
>> Subject: FW: Fessler Fesses Up to What Went Wrong in California
>>
>>  fyi
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kasarjian, Vicken
>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:56 PM
>> To: Fluckiger, Kellan; Alaywan, Ziad; Detmers, Jim; Bibb, Tracy;
>> Carlson, Trent; McIntosh, Jim; Riley, Ed; Perez, Armando
>> Subject: Fessler Fesses Up to What Went Wrong in California
>>
>> Breaking a lengthy refusal to comment publicly on the California
>> electricity "Perfect Storm," Dan Fessler (chairman and a member of the
>> California Public Utilities Commission from 1991 to December 1996)
>> described to a recent conference in New York why things have gone so awry
>> in the state and what he thinks might now be done.
>> His explanation of why the crisis arose is fairly conventional: a
shortage
>> of generation capacity; grossly erroneous predictions of the timing and
>> strength of the economic recovery in the state; and a fatal decision to
>> separate the California Power Exchange from the California Independent
>> System Operator. That's a policy to which Fessler (now with the meaty
>> LeBouef, Lamb law firm) believes that the PUC should never have agreed.
>> "Little did I realize," he told the meeting, "that the market design to
>> which the commission and legislature had acceded would turn out to bear a
>> striking resemblance to the battle cruiser, that ill-fated darling of
>> virtually every naval power in the period 1910-1914. At Jutland, it was
>> belatedly discovered that these vessels-imbued with attributes of speed
>> and weaponry that made them so appealing on paper-could not take a punch.
>> Their armor was too thin: a fatal design flaw revealed only when they
were
>> tested in battle."
>> So what do we do now? Fessler suggests "a technique which I advocated in
>> 1996 and which remains available for deployment next week. If
successfully
>> implemented, my suggestion would directly assail the vehicle of high
>> prices by enlisting self-interested opportunistic behavior to make the
>> demand curve elastic for the first time in the power crisis.
>> "I propose that California pay large users to get off the system the
>> moment reserves approach Stage One conditions. Demand bidding would
>> replace interruptible tariffs for the simple reason that [the latter]
have
>> not worked."
>


Tom does not have record of this deal at all. And I checked with the
schedulers - they don't have it down either. Is APB sure this was with El
Paso - we have similar deals from the Short Term Northwest desk with other
counterparties. Let me know.

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/20/2000 02:59 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

missing deal for tom

sell el paso
21-22
255.00
25 mw
mid c
on peak


EPMI needs you to buy:
700 CIN
100 COMED
50 off-peak CIN

EPMI needs you to sell:
100 ENT


Stephanie Panus, Senior Legal Specialist, will be joining ENA Legal on August
7 and will be supported by Becky Tlucek.  Stephanie will report to Mark
Taylor and will be located in EB3806.  Please welcome Stephanie to ENA Legal.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001
11:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           03/09/2001 10:11 AM

To: Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Guadalupe Power Partners LP

thanks.

Thomas A Martin
03/09/2001 10:00 AM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Guadalupe Power Partners LP

Yes, this deal should go to AEP with the HPL transaction.  The reason there
are no forward volumes booked is because they have a monthly election to
nominate baseload gas daily priced gas or wait and nominate daily volumes
priced at gas daily.  At any rate there is no way to know in forward months
what they are going to take subject to contractual maximums.  If you have any
further questions let me know.

Thanks,

Tom


Great.  The footnote issue scares me.   If we just use the same footnotes as
a matter of convenience, we may have some flexibility.  DF

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/07/2000 09:26 AM

To: Drew Fossum
cc:

Subject: Form 2

Per Tim's discussion with Chandler, they do not attach the brown cover, but
the footnotes used in the brown cover match the footnotes used in the Form
2.  therein lies the potential problem.
He also asked for the list of who receives the Borwn cover, Chandler has to
get from Treasury, which he said they don't like to do.  I told TIm  to
pursue in the regard it is needed for Conoco litiagation.

MK


Here's another one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000 10:09
AM ---------------------------
From: Matt Motsinger on 01/27/2000 03:24 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sandy Rivas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Union Oil and ETA for Enron Online

I received a call from Rosario Sindel with Union Oil. She has some questions
in regards to the ETA. She asked to speak with Louise Kitchen or Legal
council. I was unable to contact you by phone at the time of the call. Could
you please contact Ms. Sindel at 310-726-7767.

Thanks,

Matt
x35221
EnronOnline


Shane,

Two years is eternity at Enron.

Vince

"Shane Green" <shanecgreen@earthlink.net> on 06/20/2000 04:18:49 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Sabbatical

Dr. Kaminski:
?
I had intended to contact you regarding a position at Enron  this summer, but
the department really needed me to teach a section of  undergraduate
corporate finance this summer.? If all goes well,  and?there is a place for
me at Enron, I would be able to start after the  summer session ends in
late?July.?
?
I?discussed the possibility of a sabbatical at Enron with  Drs. Tom Arnold
and Alex Butler, both of whom send their regards, and they both  felt the
experience would be invaluable given my research and career  objectives.? Dr.
Arnold and I agreed that a sabbatical of 1-2 years would  be optimal.? I feel
that it would be difficult to get a good idea of where  the company is
headed, and to show how I can be a valuable team member in  helping it get
there?in much less than a year.? He was afraid that the  university would
begin to grumble if I was gone for much more than 2  years.? Any suggestions?
?
Thank you again for your help, and I look forward to hearing  from you.
?
??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ??
?  ???
?
??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ??
?  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  Cordially,
?
??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ??
?  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  Shane Green


Chris, why does Puget have credit concerns with us?  It was my understanding that we had a MTM of $50 MM in which they were out of the money.I thought the risk was realtively short term. ( winter Gas).  You would think that they would be fine with loading up on Enron. Irony comes in all shapes and sizes when a LDC doesn't like our credit!!!!

With regards to a meeting.... I have yet to make my way up that way, and would still like to make that tour which includes Puget, Northwest Natural, Cascade etc.

I think that a meeting with these guys on a consolidated risk management plan would  be ideal.  I will call you today.

BT
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Puget

I called Bill Gaines of Puget to try to relax our credit constraints.  We just traded voicemails, but agreed to talk on Monday.  My general message, unless you have something to add or subtract, will be: "lots has gone on at both companies, makes sense to get together to meet your team to talk about gas and power - probably is more we can be doing together, etc. meeting in late Nov/early Dec".

Thoughts?

Chris


In the event that any of your direct reports in Buenos Aires are receiving a
1999 bonus I wanted to co-ordinate the administration of such bonus to ensure
we follow your instructions and avoid communicating twice.

We are available to assist in the administration to the extent requested by
each of you. The standard administration is in the format of a letter of
appreciation and recognition dispersed directly by myself.

If you wish to administer this directly or together please let me know. If
there is an alternative format you wish to use we are also happy to
accommodate and assist if needed.

MFG


Greetings:
n order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were on
the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael Hoffman of
the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed that the
calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would take
the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy makers, and
advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face, for
however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning of
next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to be
brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan B is
a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an alternative to
the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that call I received a
copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in meeting on
Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings agency
level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of the
presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state seeks to
issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:  The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start tomorrow's
meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by the
start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the California
PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR gets paid for
power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:  Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's meeting
the universe of issues that need to be included in a comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive, but a
starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible (e.g.,
once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to creditworthiness;
approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission, generation,
etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding that
discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)


FYI.  Today Craig Barrett, CEO of Intel, publicly opposed the "state
takeover" plan released by California's Treasurer last Friday, saying,  "I'm
not a great fan of government getting involved in the private sector,
especially delivering a key commodity to the private sector."
(SF Chronicle, 01.09.01)

Might be a good opportunity to try in earnest to enlist Silicon Valley in our
efforts to get California moving in the right direction, despite itself.

Barrett said the answer is easing siting rules in order to get more power on
line sooner and blamed officials who've opposed power plants for seriously
exacerbating the problems in California.

Because of CA' power woes, Barrett said that he'd build new facilities
anywhere but in California.

Jeff

	Karen Denne
	01/09/2001 03:02 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reactive Statement to Davis' Plan

The following is a draft reactive statement to Gov. Davis' State of the State
address last night.  If you have any comments or changes, please let me know
so I can route a final version.  Thanks! kd

We're disappointed with Gov. Davis' plan to address the energy crisis in
California.  While the governor has shown some recognition of the problem,
which is simply an issue of supply and demand, we disagree with his proposed
solutions.  There are four problems in the California market: excess reliance
on spot markets, insufficient demand side response, insufficient supplies,
and financially unstable institutions.   The solutions, simply put, should be
to decrease demand, increase supply, reduce exposure to spot prices and
provide financial support to the utilities.  Gov. Davis' eight points do not
address the fundamental supply and demand issue.  Furthermore, the governor's
rhetoric detracts from implementing real solutions.

If pressed on specifics:
Rather than mandating sales of power in-state, California would be better
served by providing the utilities with strong incentives to enter into
long-term contracts and by requiring them to buy some portion of their
forward requirements from new in-state generation.
We do not understand how Gov. Davis has the constitutionality to mandate the
flow of electricity into California, particularly in states that export to
California.
The governor failed to address the credit issue of the state's two utilities
(possible solution:near-term credit guarantees).


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 11:02
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/17/2001 10:34:24 AM
To: "Lang, Gregory F." <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "'Staikos, John P.'"
<johnstaikos@paulhastings.com>, "'PARKER, Isabel'"
<isabel.parker@freshfields.com>, "VAN DUSEN, Nicholas"
<nicholas.vandusen@freshfields.com>
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'carlos.sole@enron.com'"
<carlos.sole@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Certificates and Resolutions

Gentlemen:

We have enclosed drafts of the following documents:

1.  Resolutions of sole member of Salmon Energy LLC authorizing the turbine
acquisition and related documents;
2.  Incumbency Certificate of ENA for the escrow agent; and
3.  Incumbency Certificate of PPL for the escrow agent.

The resolutions authorize the turbine contract, the loan from PPL, and the
G/E consent and agreement.  I have also drafted resolutions to be dated the
day following closing to elect as directors the persons named in the Amended
and Restated LLC Agreement (need the names of these persons - three
designees of PPL and one designee of ENA) and to replace the officers of the
LLC with persons designated by PPL.  If the lender desires Salmon
resolutions authorizing a security agreement to be signed by Salmon, we
would recommend that the new Salmon board controlled by PPL sign resolutions
ratifying and approving the security agreement, rather than have ENA approve
a security agreement that it has not negotiated and is not familiar with.

From a timing standpoint, we need to focus on the documentation required to
set up the escrow account, as I understand that the escrow may be funded on
the same day as the financial closing, namely, Thursday, April 19.  Citibank
will need (I) the escrow agreement, (ii) an incumbency certificate from each
party to the escrow agreement, (iii) a W-9 signed by each non-corporate
party to the escrow agreement, and (iv) a signed fee agreement.  The
incumbency certificates are enclosed.  Please insert names and other
information as appropriate.  We need comments to the Escrow Agreement in as
soon as possible in order that we can provide these documents to Citibank
for approval.

Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 137061v3
  140106v1
  140109v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Salmon - Resolutions of LLC.DOC
 - Enron Incumbency Cert for Escrow.DOC
 - Pegasus Incumbency Certif for Escrow.DOC


Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 04:56 PM -----

	"Malone, Patty" <PMalone@velaw.com>
	12/22/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: "'jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com'" <jeffrey.w.dellapina@chase.com>,
"'melissa.c.vogel@chase.com'" <melissa.c.vogel@chase.com>,
"'philip.levy@chase.com'" <philip.levy@chase.com>, "'mwilson@milbank.com'"
<mwilson@milbank.com>, "'rwight@milbank.com'" <rwight@milbank.com>,
"'kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com'" <kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com>,
"'renee_r_nadler@fleet.com'" <renee_r_nadler@fleet.com>,
"'richard_aidala@fleet.com'" <richard_aidala@fleet.com>,
"'jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com'" <jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com>,
"'james_r_mcbride@fleet.com'" <james_r_mcbride@fleet.com>,
"'mark_serice@fleet.com'" <mark_serice@fleet.com>, "'sean_o'neill@fleet.com'"
<sean_o'neill@fleet.com>, "Shouse, August" <AShouse@velaw.com>,
"'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'" <teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>,
"'joseph.deffner@enron.com'" <joseph.deffner@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron/Mahonia transaction documents

> From August Shouse:
>
> Attached are revised documents.  They are marked against prior drafts
> except for the VE opinion, which is marked against the June 2000
> transaction opinion.  Enron has not reviewed or approved these revisions
> and, in particular but without limitation, needs to consider the
> rehypothecation provision added to the Margin Agreement.
>
>  <<Houston_418197_1.DOC>>  <<Houston_418211_1.DOC>>
> <<Houston_418317_1.DOC>>  <<Houston_418230_1.DOC>>
> <<Houston_418239_1.DOC>>  <<Houston_418290_1.DOC>>
> <<Houston_418301_1.DOC>>  <<Houston_418242_1.DOC>>
> <<Houston_418249_1.DOC>>
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - Houston_418197_1.DOC
 - Houston_418211_1.DOC
 - Houston_418317_1.DOC
 - Houston_418230_1.DOC
 - Houston_418239_1.DOC
 - Houston_418290_1.DOC
 - Houston_418301_1.DOC
 - Houston_418242_1.DOC
 - Houston_418249_1.DOC


Sounds like a good plan!  I'm at 1920 Banks Street, the last street off
Shepherd before you hit the Swest Fwy.  So, when you leave church, go down
Shepherd, then make a right on the last street before the fwy.  Go past the
1st stop sign and then I'll be about the 3rd or 4th house on the left, a
taupe colored cottage with a pointy roof and vines growing halfway up the
side of the house.  My home # is 529-1038.  See you at 12:45!

	Alicia Goodrow/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/09/2001 08:24 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Azalea Trail

If you don't mind dropping me back by home after we tour, I'll have Henry
drop me at your new house after church on Sunday......maybe at 1245....I
haven't seen your new digs.; Where exactly are they?
;
Alicia

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Thu 3/8/2001 9:14 AM
To: Goodrow, Alicia
Cc:
Subject: Re: Azalea Trail

 It sound good to me.; Shall we meet at your house or mine and at what time?

;;;;;;; Alicia Goodrow/ENRON@enronXgate

 03/06/2001 05:13 PM

 ;;;;;;; ;;;;;;;

;;;;;;; To:;;;; Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

;;;;;;; cc:;;;;

;;;;;;; Subject:;;;;;;; Azalea Trail;;;

 Would you like to do some Azalea Trailing on Sunday afternoon?; Henry will
owe me some babysitting time after being gone for 2 weeks and I always have
fun cruising the lifesyle of the rich and famous set with you.....

 ALG


---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Liz M Taylor@ECT
10/27/2000 02:37 PM
To: Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ENW Org Chart

Sherri,

Will these two pages help you?  Louise Kitchen and Philippe Bibi are Greg's
direct reports.  All the commercial folks roll up to Louise and Technical
folks (slide 2) report up to Bibi.  EOL (Andy Zipper & Team) report to Louise
Kitchen.


Tammi,

Attached is an image of the GISB.  As you see it was CES acquired by ENA in
asset purchase.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:38 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/05/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: Ann.Cohn@sce.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mkahl@ka-pow.com,
jdasovic@enron.com, wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@camfg.com,
smutny@iepa.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com,
isenberg@hmot.com, jstewart@cmta.net, mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com,
lga@mother.com, debinorton@aol.com, cra@calretailers.com,
derek.naten@roche.com, vjw@cleanpower.org, "John R. Redding (PS, NE)
(E-mail)" <john.redding@gene.GE.com>, "Mike Florio (E-mail)"
<mflorio@turn.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bond Leg Language, etc.

Greetings:

Hope everyone had a pleasant 4th.

I've read the respective Burton and Hertzberg language on amending AB 1X.
The Burton language looks cleaner and simpler, though there may be reasons to
include some of the Hertzberg language, too.

I'm proposing to the group the following as potential amendments to the bond
bill.  I would appreciate your feedback.  The amendments would be as follows:

Customers who were on Direct Access when DWR started buying power (Jan.
17th?), and are still on Direct Access when the bill passes, should be exempt
from paying for the bonds.

In short, customers should not be forced to pay for power twice--once from
their ESP, and once from DWR.  Since these customers receive power services
from their ESP, they never consumed DWR power in the first place and it
wouldn't be fair to require them to pay for it.

Customers who have been utility customers since DWR started buying power but
subsequently switched to Direct Access should only pay for power provided by
DWR that they actually consumed, no more and no less.

For example, if a customer was a utility customer when DWR started buying
power but switched to Direct Access on May 1st, then the customer would only
be responsible for reimbursing DWR for power deliveries that took place from
Jan. 17th thru April 30th.

I believe that we agreed on these concepts during the negotiations that took
place over the past 4-5 weeks.  Or if we didn't explicitly agree during the
talks, they seem to be principles on which we ought to be able to agree
pretty easily now. And rather than leave the issue hanging, which can create
unnecessary and costly uncertainty for customers, I suggest that we include
very clear and simple legislative language in the bond bill clarifying what
customers' obligations are.  Your thoughts are appreciated.

In addition, we have talked quite a bit about providing customers with
incentives in the attempt to get California out of the energy hole that it
finds itself in.  Providing (20KW and above) customers with an incentive to
switch to Direct Access as soon as possible could 1) reduce the net short
position that the state (and ultimately consumers) have to finance, thereby
reducing spot purchases and price volatility,  2) reduce electricity
purchasing costs, and 3) reduce the burden on the state budget.

With this in mind, I'm also proposing that the group consider an amendment to
the bond bill that would exempt from bond charges any customer that switches
to Direct Access by September 1st.

Finally, it seems odd that the language directing the PUC to suspend Direct
Access is still in the bill.  If a dedicated rate component is created, that
seems to eliminate altogether the need to suspend Direct Access.  And if
that's the case, would it make sense to delete that language from the bill?

Look forward to your comments and working with you to get support for and
passage of the "core/noncore" proposal.

Best,
Jeff


Are you on of this?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/17/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Eric Benson                           02/16/2000 03:35 PM

To: Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Allen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David L Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron

Subject: 1999 Enron Corp. Compliance Report

To: Distribution
From: Eric Benson

 You all should have received by now a photocopy of the 1998 Compliance
Report from the Enron Gas Pipeline Group Compliance Committee that may be
used to report 1999 compliance report activities.  In my January 5, 2000 memo
to you all, we requested that handwritten comments/updates be provided to my
attention by February 15th.

 I have yet to receive any such comments/updates.  Please provide any
comments/updates by the end of this week so the report can be finalized and
sent to Sharon Butcher within the time frame she requested.  If there are no
comments/updates, please let me know.

Thanks,

Eric Benson
Research Analyst


Donald was trying to sort by POR AND POD,  Donald gets a repeating error of "invalid variant type conversion".

I tried to do that and no problem, but I am using the app locally, and Donald for some reason still has to go thru the windows 2000 terminal server.  I really want him to be able to use the app locally like it was designed to be used.

Please let me know.

C


Try this one guys, the last one was distorted.

Apologies,
Y
---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
04/05/2000 03:51 PM ---------------------------

Holly Heath
04/05/2000 03:51 PM
To: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: March preliminary ledgers

Sorry Yvette, try this one!

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           04/05/2000 03:49 PM

To: Holly Heath/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: March preliminary ledgers

Holly,
This spreadsheet seems to have errors in every cell.  Can you help?

Yvette
x3.5953

Holly Heath
04/05/2000 03:25 PM
To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: March preliminary ledgers

Attached are your preliminary March ledgers.  Please review and have any
changes to me by noon Friday, April 7th.  If you have any questions, please
call me at @3-5843.  Thanks so much.

Holly Heath


For the week of December 24 - 28


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/11/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 10/11/2000 05:31:35 PM
To: <peter.bray@att.net>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <MNelson@electric.com>,
<RSchlanert@electric.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>, <kmagruder@newpower.com>,
<Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Edison and PG&E Emergency Motions - - - ALJ Ruling Just Issued

Last week you were sent an email which discussed the October 4 emergency
motions of Edison and PG&E to modify the end of rate freeze decisions.?  On
October 5, Edison filed an ex parte request for the immediate suspension of
the effective date of portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.??On  October
6, PG&E filed its support of Edison,s request for immediate  suspension of
the effective dates of the decisions. The motions were filed  because of the
significant undercollections which are being accumulated in their  purchased
power accounts.
?
A ruling has just been issued by ALJ Minkin which directs parties to file
responses to Edison,s and PG&E,s ex parte requests for immediate suspension
of certain portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.? The judge says, "In
effect, Edison and PG&E have moved for a stay of certain aspects of these
decisions.? Consistent with Rule 45(f), responses to motions must be filed
and served within 15 days of the date that the motion was served, unless the
administrative law judge sets a different date.? Therefore, responses to
Edison,s and PG&E,s requests must be filed and served by October 20,  2000."
?
She also notes that the utilities' financial information must be provided  by
October 17 and provides that, "Parties have the opportunity to comment on
the  financial information provided by the utilities and the emergency
petitions  (including the amended petitions) by October 30."
?
This suggests that the filing due on the 20th could be primarily  procedural,
dealing with the propriety of the Commission issuing a stay of  previously
approved decisions.? The filing on the 30th would then deal with  the
substance of the emergency requests, as well as making any comments on the
financial data provided by the utilities.? This would provide more time to
review the financial data and work out the details of any "counter proposal"
which ARM might want to make.? However, we could also deal with substantive
issues in the 10/20 filing.? We should discuss this soon and determine what
course ARM would like to pursue.
?
A copy of the ruling is attached for your information.
?
Dan
 - ALJ Ruling 0f 10-11-00.doc


for weddings - The Silver Rose and a house owned by the Honig's 963-5618.  A
good friend of mine, Lucy Loberg, works at the Silver Rose - 24 rooms, lake
restaurant etc

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


We will need to establish a deadline.  Will Friday March 10th work?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:14
PM ---------------------------

Kim Melodick
02/18/2000 05:34 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

Attached you will find the salary survey questionnaire for your review.  You
will need to fill out the questionnaire for each exempt job group in your
department.  Please be as specific as possible to ensure we are capturing all
the skills needed to accurately price the job.  If you have filled out the
questionnaire in the past, you may want to update the information.  I will be
happy to address any questions you have regarding the form.


Cara,
I was out Friday, but totally agree on segregation of East and West Confirmations.  Also, I agree that there needs to be a method to delete confirmation records (either for mistakes on date, path changes requiring it, etc).  I didn't get any records to go to the confirmation table on Thursday, so I'll look at the information on the transmission cells uploaded today.

I don't think repeating some of the errors we find is too big of a problem.

CB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Bentley, Corry; Poston, David; Smith, Will; Venkataswami, Vishwanatha
Subject:	Testing June 22

Good Afternoon Everyone

PreSchedule Workspace:

I started uploading schedules last evening from the PSW to the Path Confirm Dbase.  The COB sheet took 1 hour and 12 minutes to run 40 lines, still around 2 minutes per line.  This is an improvement, still slow for usefulness in production.

I experimented with putting the transmission in the E column, to see if it will represent in the path or if it will blow up the app. The result of that was that it ran the lines and totally ignored anything extra in the E cell.

Path Confirmation:

We will need to automatically make sure that only East users see East Schedules and West users see West Schedules.  I cannot comprehend the nightmare of problems we will run into if we are not completely segregated.

If I run lines into the wrong date, or for some other reason need to delete entire records, how do I do that? I assure you this will happen.

*Something seems to have changed in the transmission cell uploading, Any information I put in the first set of Transmission cells is ignored. (Trans1 Name, Trans1 deal, Trans 1 oasis).

That's all I am going to do for now,  we can pick things up again on Monday.  Do you think it would be good to do a quick rundown of what has been identified and what has been corrected ? I am worried that my testing might have to be repeated on some of the same items due to the volume of e-mails.

Thanks,

Cara


----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 04/12/01 08:52 AM
-----

	EBS Education Center
	Sent by: EBS Announcements
	04/11/01 06:12 PM

		 To: All EBS Employees Worldwide
		 cc:
		 Subject: EBS Luncheon Discussion Series & Interactive MSHOW Event - Walk in
Space with Joe Edwards

EBS Luncheon Discussion Series & Interactive MSHOW Event

Walk in Space with Joe Edwards

Join former astronaut, Joe Edwards for a special EBS Luncheon Discussion
Series presentation on his life as a NASA space shuttle astronaut.  Joe will
show pictures and video clips from his mission in space, as well as describe
what life is like in low earth orbit.

Date:  April 17th
Time:  11:45
Location: 5C2 or via MSHOW--Click on the link provided

MSHOW link will be provided on Monday, April 16th.

Extra - New Training Dates

Fundamentals of Corporate Finance-- 1 1/2 Days
Dates:   May 29-30, 2001 (1 1/2 Days) - Houston - Shepherd
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost:   $600   (charged to your cost center)

Applied Corporate Finance & Transaction Structuring--1 1/2 Days
Dates:   May 2-3, 2001 (1 1/2 Days) - Houston - Shepherd
 May 12-13, 2001 (1 1/2 Days) - Houston - Shepherd
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $600.00  (charged to your cost center)

Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be received 48 hours prior to class
date to avoid being charged.

TO REGISTER, CLICK ON THE LINK >>

Introduction To Bandwidth Risk Management Fundamentals
Dates:   May 8, 2001 - Houston
 May 15, 2001 - Portland
 July 9, 2001 - Portland
 July 25, 2001 - Houston
 September 20, 2001 - Houston
 September 25, 2001 - Portland
 November 6, 2001 - Houston
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $350 (charged to your cost center)

Advanced Broadband Risk Management
Dates:   May 31 - June 1, 2001 - Houston
 June 7-8, 2001 - Portland
 July 12-13, 2001 - Houston
 October 10-11, 2001 - Houston
 October 29-30, 2001 - Portland
 December 12-13, 2001 - Houston
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $700 (charged to your cost center)

Prerequisite: Introduction to Bandwidth Risk Management

Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be received 48 hours prior to class
date to avoid being charged.

TO REGISTER, CLICK ON THE LINK >>


Dear Dynegydirect  Customer:

In our efforts to provide you the best on-line trading product in the
industry, we would like to request your participation in the following
survey.  The survey contains questions regarding funtionality, performance
and customer service of Dynegydirect.

Please follow the steps below to complete the survey.  The survey should
take less than 5 minutes to complete.

1. Please click the link below to go to the survey.
2. Enter your Dynegydirect ID on the first page and click on START.  We use
your ID to ensure that only Dynegydirect customers participate in the
survey.
3. Complete the survey and click on SUBMIT.

http://www.dynegydirect.com/content/survey/satisfactionsurvey.htm

Your participation in the survey is greatly appreciated by Dynegydirect.
If you encounter any difficulty with the link or need assistance with the
survey, please call e-Care at 1-877-396-3493.

Many thanks,

e-Care Center
Dynegy, Inc.


PLEASE TRY TO GET YOUR TIMESHEETS TO ME BY THURSDAY AFTERNOON.

Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

Chris Hilgert
03/06/2000 09:19 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Project Wilhelm Reference Documents

Ladies,

Per Lisa Mellencamp's request, you will find attached a term sheet,
transaction diagram, and pricing grid spreadsheet (as referenced in the term
sheet for your reference.  I have also attached a deal schedule that I would
appreciate your comments on.  I will be out of the office today, but will be
back in tomorrow.  If you should have any questions, don't hesitate to
contact me at 3-7350.

Thanks,
Chris


Osman,

Thanks.

Vince

Osman Sezgen@EES
04/26/2001 03:27 PM
To: William Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Praveen Mellacheruvu/HOU/EES@EES, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Newsletter article

Vince,

Here is an article that Sam intends to publish this coming Monday.  Please
have a look at it and give us (Sam or me)  feedback.

Thanks,
Osman


Donna and Richard

Here are more as promised (including the correct Equity Comparables report).
Call me if you have any questions.

John


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/12/2000 02:21 PM -----

	"North American Summit Team" <ibarreto@caem.org>
	11/10/2000 03:34 PM
	Please respond to ibarreto

		 To: "Energy Restructuring Stakeholders" <ibarreto@caem.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: DOE-NARUC North American Summit announces new speakers and an
online bulletin board

[[ MAPI 1.0 storage : 5435 in winmail.dat ]]

NARUC and DOE are the hosting the North American Summit on Harmonizing
Business Practices in Energy Restructuring in Dallas, Texas, on November 29
to December 1.  This email is an update on recent developments in the
Summit.

Newly confirmed speakers include Commissioner Linda Breathitt, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission; Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), chairman of the
House Energy and Power Subcommittee; Phil Sharp, Lecturer in Public Policy,
Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Kurt Yaeger, president and
CEO, Electric Power Research Institute; Bob Anderson, commissioner, Montana
Public Service Commission; Karen O'Neill, vice president for new markets,
GreenMountain.com; Steve Ward, public advocate, Maine Attorney General's
office; Donato Eassay, vice president, securities research and economics,
Merrill Lynch; Rick Rumbarger, president and CEO, PowerTrust.com; Kathleen
Magruder, Vice President, Government Affairs, The New Power Company (a joint
venture of IBM, Enron, and AOL)

We have established a bulletin board for the Summit.  You can access the
bulletin board through the following link:
http://www.energymarkets.org/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro.  The Forums
in this board will permit you to ask questions or raise issues for the
speakers on each of the panels at the Summit.

You can register for the Summit at
http://www.energymarkets.org/registration.htm.

Information on reserving a room a the Adams Mark is at
http://www.energymarkets.org/city_site.htm.

Please forward this email to colleagues who may be interested in the subject
of the Summit.

Thanks!

Isabel Barreto
North American Summit Coordinator
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
5765-F Burke Center Parkway (PMB333)
Burke, VA 22015-2233
Voicemail and Fax: (703) 234-3373
E-mail: ibarreto@caem.org
http://www.caem.org

Thanks!

Isabel Barreto
North American Summit Coordinator
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
5765-F Burke Center Parkway (PMB333)
Burke, VA 22015-2233
Voicemail and Fax: (703) 234-3373
E-mail: ibarreto@caem.org
http://www.caem.org

 - winmail.dat


Michelle is it possible to evaluate a park-n-ride in deal profitability?  If
not would this be valuable?  If it would be Mei-Ling and I would like to meet
with you to understand what we might have to modify.


Hardcopies also to follow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 04/07/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------

"Roark, Donnie" <droark@velaw.com> on 04/07/2000 11:44:59 AM
To: "'rshapiro@enron.com'" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc: "Dilg, Joe" <jdilg@velaw.com>
Subject: Attached Files

Richard,

Pursuant to Joe Dilg's request, I am forwarding the electronic versions of
Sections II, III, IV, and V of the IM which were distributed on 4/6.  We
will also be sending you by courier a complete hard copy of the faxed 4/6
draft, which includes Section I.  The electronic and faxed copies are the
same draft.  Please call with any questions or comments.

Regards,
Donnie Roark
 <<SoCal IM 04-06 Section V Power Generation.DOC>>  <<SoCal IM 04-06 Section
III Power Distribution.DOC>>  <<SoCal IM 04-06 Section II Gas
Pipelines.DOC>>  <<SoCal IM 04-06 Gas Distrib. Section IV no maps.DOC>>

 - SoCal IM 04-06 Section V Power Generation.DOC
 - SoCal IM 04-06 Section III Power Distribution.DOC
 - SoCal IM 04-06 Section II Gas Pipelines.DOC
 - SoCal IM 04-06 Gas Distrib. Section IV no maps.DOC
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 04/07/2000
12:44 PM ---------------------------

"Roark, Donnie" <droark@velaw.com> on 04/07/2000 11:55:09 AM
To: "'rshapiro@enron.com'" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Section I

Please find attached Section I from the 4/6 draft of the IM.

 - #251862 v1 - SECTION 1.doc


Hi Michelle,
Following up on this again...I know you're busy!
Diane, any ideas?

Thanks,
Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Burke, Daniel
Sent:	Tuesday, October  23, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Gambill, Amy; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Changes to our Infinity Contract

Any update to this?

Is there a way for Enron to pay Infinity electronically?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gambill, Amy
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Burke, Daniel; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Changes to our Infinity Contract
Importance:	High

Michelle,
What would you suggest?  To jog your memory, Infinity is the outsourcing group Freight Markets is using in Chicago?not for recruiting at all.  Should we just add a PWD (or whatever they're called) reflecting the different rate for the Director?

Thanks!
Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Burke, Daniel
Sent:	Wednesday, October  3, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Gambill, Amy
Subject:	Changes to our Infinity Contract

Amy,

Who do I need to talk to about changes to our Infinity Customer Solutions contract?

We have added a supervisor at a different rate per month and I think the contract should reflect that.

Thanks

Dan Burke


FYI.  This is Christopher's roommates resume.  Mary Kay is sending
	me Christophers today hopefully.  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 07/09/2001 05:59 PM ---------------------------
From:	Mike Barry/Enron@enronXgate on 07/02/2001 07:29 AM
To:	Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Pat Barry's Resume/References


Start Date: 2/22/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022221.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 21 / Preferred:   0.51 / Final:   0.48)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Are you receiving and are you reviewing the monthly fee statements from the
professionals, including Greenberg Glusker?  I believe you agreed to do this
and it would surely help share some of the load.  Let me know.  Best,
Howard.

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE* The information contained in this e-mail message is
intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as
such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail, and
delete the original message.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 08:40 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Woertz, Byron" <BWoertz@caiso.com>
07/24/2000 06:04 PM

To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice - CPUC Subpoena

  Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

  AT 5:15 PM today, the ISO received a subpoena from the CPUC
related to the information the CPUC previously requested as described in an
ISO message to Market Participants in a notice sent on Wednesday July 19.
The subpoena requires the ISO to respond by 5:00PM, Tuesday July 25. The ISO
will electronically scan and circulate the document tomorrow morning.
Questions can be directed to Jeanne Sole at 916-608-7144.

  Jeanne M. Sol,
  Regulatory Counsel
  California ISO
  (916) 608-7144

____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
  The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any
Attachments Thereto) Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its
Terms May Be Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or
Other Applicable Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution,
Or Reproduction Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.


---------------------- Forwarded by Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Marilyn Rivera                           04/21/2000 01:17 PM

To: Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, rebeccar@bcm.tmc.edu, mmartinez@tmh.tmc.edu
cc:
Subject: FW: (GAMES)

games
---------------------- Forwarded by Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

Joel Rivera <Joel.Rivera@Halliburton.com> on 04/21/2000 12:25:34 PM
To: "'Marilyn Rivera'" <Marilyn.Rivera@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: (GAMES)

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Corey Boudreaux
Sent:?? Monday, April 17, 2000 3:41 PM
To:???? Joel Rivera
Subject:??????? FW: (GAMES)

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Paul Lightfoot
Sent:?? Monday, April 17, 2000 11:22 AM
To:???? Corey Boudreaux
Subject:??????? FW:

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Angela Willis
Sent:?? Tuesday, March 21, 2000 1:14 PM
To:???? Paul Lightfoot
Subject:??????? FW:

has some different ones

ANGELA
?angela.willis@halliburton.com?
? (713) 676-8572

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Linhoff, Connie S. @ Houston Galleria
[SMTP:clinhoff@cbrichardellis.com]
Sent:?? Tuesday, March 21, 2000 1:07 PM
To:???? 'Angie'
Subject:??????? FW:

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Kapalski, Stephen @ Houston Galleria
Sent:?? Tuesday, March 14, 2000 4:52 PM
To:???? Linhoff, Connie S. @ Houston Galleria
Subject:??????? FW:

-----Original Message-----
From:?? McClymonds, Reagan @ Houston Galleria
Sent:?? Tuesday, March 14, 2000 4:48 PM
To:???? Kapalski, Stephen @ Houston Galleria
Subject:???????

<<Airhock.exe>> <<Sticks.exe>> <<Sol.exe>> <<Same.exe>> <<Hangman1.exe>>
<<Jacks.exe>> <<Frogger.exe>> <<Blocks.exe>> <<Yacht1.exe>>

Reagan McClymonds
 <<Airhock.exe>>  <<Sticks.exe>>  <<Sol.exe>>  <<Same.exe>>
<<Hangman1.exe>>  <<Jacks.exe>>  <<Frogger.exe>>  <<Blocks.exe>>
<<Yacht1.exe>>

 - Airhock.exe
 - Sticks.exe
 - Sol.exe
 - Same.exe
 - Hangman1.exe
 - Jacks.exe
 - Frogger.exe
 - Blocks.exe
 - Yacht1.exe


THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENT IS THE UPDATED COUNTERPARTY LIST FOR THE MONTH OF
APRIL.
KRISTINE


We have length on peak Monday, 04-23 in NP-15.  The energy is in PGE3, 25 mws
are under ST-WBOM and 56 mws are in ST-CALI.  We need to sell all 81 mws.  In
Enpower we buy the 25 mws from imbalance under ST-WBOM, and sell them under
ST-WBOM.  ST-WBOM is long at $230.  We buy the 56 mws under the ST-CALI book
and then sell it off for a profit split under the ST-CALI book.  I will be in
Seattle this weekend.  If you have any questions, you can reach me on my cell
phone.

Thanks,
Bill


Care has to be taken as to what constitutes an "acceptable" waiver letter, and if it is too broad (e.g., gives them anything in the way of being able to take sides against us on a matter on which they have done work for us) it would be unacceptable.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Britt
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:01 PM
To:	Holsworth, Mark; Haedicke, Mark E.; Vote, Robert; Armogida, Jim; Bushman, Teresa G.; Cheek, Charles
Subject:	FW: In re F&J Representation

FYI.

Britt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Derrick Jr., James
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:57 PM
To:	Davis, Britt
Subject:	RE: In re F&J Representation

I support your suggestiion.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Britt
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Holsworth, Mark; Armogida, Jim; Bushman, Teresa G.; Haedicke, Mark E.; Vote, Robert
Subject:	In re F&J Representation
Importance:	High

	I have now spoken with the following people in doing further due diligence:

	1.  Theresa Bushman.  Theresa tells me that she shares the view with Mariner's GC that it would be helpful to have F&J continue to represent Mariner for the time being, given F&J's knowledge of Mariner's corporate history.  Theresa, if I have mischaracterized what you told me, please respond.

	2.   Kelly Zelacovitz, Mariner's GC.  Kelly advised me recently that she has a new corporate matter of some urgency that she wants to retain F&J to handle, subject to your approval.  Kelly told me that she would be contacting you about this.

	3.   Prof. John Dzienkowski of the University School of Law.   John has given me his informal thoughts over the telephone on the ethical issues, based on hypotheticals I presented to him; of course, these are not to be taken as recommendations.  In a nutshell, John thinks it would be problematic for a law firm to unilaterally withdraw from the representation of a corporate client solely and only to be able to take on more business potentially adverse to that client in the future.  John thinks it might be appropriate to ask for a disgorgement of fees paid under these circumstances.

	4.  Uriel Dutton.  Dutton says that with an appropriate waiver letter, F&J would be willing to continue its representation of Enron and the Enron subsidiaries, including Mariner and the proposed new Mariner matter, conditioned on the following:

	a.  F&J could not continue to represent Corp. on  one of the three IP matters, which is the nonprovisional patent application (although Dutton was not specific, I believe F&J lists it as the "Method and System for the Determination of VAR").

	b.  F&J would continue to represent Corp. on the six or so abestosis matters in order to try and get Corp. dismissed, but with the understanding that if dismissal was not available, that new representation would be obtained by Corp. before trial.

	c.  Dutton will be sending over a draft proposed waiver letter for our consideration.   We told Dutton that we anticipated getting back to him on this matter early next week.  Although Dutton will be out of the office next week, he will be reachable by cell phone.

	Proposed going forward strategy:

	Chuck and I suggest that if an acceptable waiver letter can be fashioned, that we proceed with proposal offered by F&J.  We invite comments.

	Britt


To respond to the needs of our customers the following management
appointments are effective immediately:

Alan Stringer, EHS Director based in London will be responsible for European
/ Asia / India Regions.  Alan  will continue to report to myself and Brian
Stanley (based in London).   Bal Wong EHS Manager based in Guam will report
to Alan.   Alan  and Bal form a great team.  Both have extensive experience
in undertaking and providing support for Environmental Due Diligence projects
throughout the world for the past ten years for various blue chips, lawyers,
banks and venture capital companies averaging several billion dollars worth
of assets reviewed each year for the past 5 years.  Both can provide an
extensive depth of knowledge as internal consultants in assessing
environmental health and safety risk and supporting development of risk
mitigation measures that can be applied in the sale and purchase agreements
and contracts.  Both have impressive experience in remediation technology.

Attached is a flow chart for environmental and social due diligence that
shows our organization and responsibilities.

Henry Van
General Manager, EH&S
Asset Operations


Thank you for making your travel plans with Travelocity.com.  We have
issued your ticket for the following reservation.  We suggest that you
save this notification for reference should you need to contact us
concerning your tickets.

TRIP ID:837685767086

You have been issued paper tickets.  You will receive your tickets via
FedEx at the following address:

JONATHAN SMITH
6386 SHAKER TRACT RD
NORTH ROSE NY  14516
315-483-8069
SLULFV FEDEX

Your FedEx Tracking # is:
792394407177

You may use this number to track your FedEx delivery online at www.fedex.com.

You may view all your pending travel plans online through the "My Trips"
feature on Travelocity.com: Go to www.travelocity.com, select "My Trips",
then select the trip you wish to review.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact us via email at
memberservices@travelocity.com ; be sure to reference your Trip ID.
We will respond to your email within 24 hours.

Alternately, you may call Travelocity.com Customer Service at 888-709-5983
with
your Trip ID available.  We are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

We strongly recommend that you check your reservations in "My Trips" on
Travelocity.com within 48 hours of departure for any last-minute changes.  You
should also reconfirm your flights by calling the airline at least 24 hours
prior
to travel (48 hours for international flights).

Thank you again for your business.

Travelocity.com Customer Service

NOTICE: TRAVELOCITY.COM MAINTAINS A FACILITY IN SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
FOR THIS REASON, YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY MAY PLACE THE WORDS "SAN ANTONIO"
IN ADDITION TO THE TICKET NUMBER AND CARRIER NAME IN THE EXPLANATION LINE
ON YOUR STATEMENT RELATED TO YOUR TRANSACTION WITH TRAVELOCITY.COM.


Please review and verify the attached spreadsheet. Make any corrections to employee info in RED on the spreadsheet

As we will not hold a pre-ranking meeting, please provide a pre-rank of 1-5 (see attached rating descriptors) for each employee.

COMMERCIAL:
Commercial employees are identified by a C in the Peer Group column
You should be prepared to represent these employees at the July 9 Commercial PRC meeting

COMMERCIAL SUPPORT:

Commercial Support employees are identified by a CS in the Peer Group column
Non-exempt employees (Clerks/Adminstrative Assistants/Coordinators) will not participate in a PRC meeting.  Your ranking on the spreadsheet 1-3 (see attached rating descriptors under Job  Group Participation) will be the final ranking for these employees

Note: If your employees used the PEP system to do a self-evaluation, it is important that you review the accomplishments section of the self-eval prior to attending a PRC meeting.  This information will be available to display on the screen during the meeting.

If you have any questions, call me at 5-3847.  Please send the completed spreadsheet to me no later than MONDAY, JUNE 11.


in case some of my e-mails are floating through cyber space I'll recap--

packers 20 cardinals 0
packers 20 vikings    6
bucs       37 packers  0
packers 20 patriots  0
packers 13 bears     6
packers  35 raiders  6

let me know if you receive  this.


How about meeting in Sheila's office (3879) at 1030?