The following deal has been changed once more. Here are the details:

576468
West Services buys from APX
NP-15
Off Peak - 1.8 MW @ $140
     10.2 MW @ $150
TOTAL MWH = 96

(572069 stays 12 MW @ $150)

Please call me with questions.

Thanks,
Kate
503-464-7486 or 3823

	From:  Chris H Foster                           04/10/2001 07:52 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #576468.1 & 572069.1 (4/6/2001 & 4/7/2001)

Kate:

Can you please modify that deal that you made the price $140 yesterday to
make it for the 6th only?  The 7th is all at $150.

Thanks

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
09:58 AM ---------------------------

Audrey Cook
04/10/2001 07:51 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal #576468.1 & 572069.1 (4/6/2001 & 4/7/2001)

Chris,
Good morning!  Hey, one thing I probably did not clarify to you yesterday on
was that when the new deal ticket was set up for the $140 price strip (Deal
#576468.1), the deal should only be in for (4/6/2001) according to APX's
statement (not including 4/7/2001).  Therefore, the entire offpeak for your
deal would be booked on Deal #572069.1 for the $150 price for 4/7/2001.  Let
me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
ajc

---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 09:44
AM ---------------------------

Audrey Cook
04/06/2001 01:27 PM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: APX - 4/6/2001

Chris,
One more quick thing on 4/6/2001- APX is showing 2 different prices for
offpeak ($140 & $150 - different MW per strip).  EPMI is showing $150 @ 12/MW
per offpeak hours.  This difference amounts to a $144 difference (APX has
lower invoice).  Can you verify?  Everything else is fine....talk to you next
week.  Have a good weekend.
ajc


Please take a final look at Section 13 as purposed by Northeast as they have
changed the last sentence again!

Enron recognizes that, when NEGM is acting as Buyer hereunder, NEGM is
purchasing gas on behalf of certain gas companies (the &Repurchasers8) to
whom it immediately resells such gas at the Delivery Point(s).    The parties
further agree that the term &Transporter8 when used in this Contract,
including, but not limited to, in Sections 4 and 11, shall include any
company acting in the capacity of a transporter for any Repurchaser and agree
that Section 4.3 of the Contract will apply to invoices from such
Transporters for Imbalance Charges received from such Transporters to the
same extent as if such invoices were received by NEGM provided, that any such
Repurchaser  scheduled and nominated the same volumes as Enron and NEGM
scheduled and nominated on hehalf  of  such  Repurchaser at the Delivery
Point(s).

Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Yes.  I can go to lunch today.  I'll meet you at the entrance of the cafeteria.  When?
Also, take Rosemary a check on Sat. made out to March of Dimes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: Re:

Okay I'll go for a ticket.

Are you back in town.  Do you want to go to the cafeteria for lunch.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Here's what we've delivered to Davis:
Message points on the "big picture"
Reasons that the Governor needs to broaden his information network (i.e., get
better advice) and a proposal for how to do it
Comments on the Governor's proposals
Detail on how to execute the "buy-down" proposal
7X24, Peak and Off peak prices for 5-year blocks of power

The only thing left to send is the Nord Pool material, which Jim Steffes is
help me to gather for delivery tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff


Consumer Price Index

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/16/2000 12:14 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal

Daren,
Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know
what CPI stands for???

Sandi

	Daren J Farmer
	10/16/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal

Sandi,

Sorry for just now getting back with you.  I was out last week.

The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated
on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant.  The fee will
be adjusted yearly based on CPI.

Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the
delivered volumes (actuals or nominations).  I think we should use actuals
due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a
daily basis.  We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to
purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at
the 45,000 base.  I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they
are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less.  Do
you agree with this?

D

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rate for  Tenaska Deal

Daren,
When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you
guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me
how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater
of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual
deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year?
based on what index?

Thanks,
Sandi


Dear All,

I have heard from several of you today that we continue to receive Broker
Confirms which reference "WSPP Schedule C" instead of "CAISO Energy" for
deals done at California Delivery Points.  I have spoken with Bob Badeer and
he promised me that he and Jeff are going to call them as soon as they can.

In the meantime, if for any SP15, NP15, or Z26 deals we receive a Broker
Confirmation with  "WSPP Schedule C" instead of "CAISO Energy", please mark
out the former by hand and replace it with the latter. Then fax the amended
Confirmation back to the Broker and say something in the fax Cover Sheet to
the effect of :

"We have amended the attached Confirmation(s) to show that the relevant
energy purchased/sold is "CAISO Energy". Please revise your Confirmation(s)
to reflect this modification and send the amended Confirmation(s) to us and
our Counterparty. Should you have any questions with regard to the "CAISO
Energy" product, please contact Bob Badeer on (503) 464-3926 or Jeff Richter
on (503) 464-3720."

Let's give Bob and Jeff some time to call the brokers and I would propose to
reassess the situation next Monday (I am out of the office on business on
Friday). Let's see where we are then.

Thanks everyone,

Shari

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 05:57 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	07/27/2000 04:07 PM

		 To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Power Brokers who will not reference CAISO Energy

Bob & Jeff,

At my request, the Confirm Desk has put together a list of Brokers who
continue to reference " West Firm" rather than "CAISO" in their Broker
Confirmations for deals done at the California Delivery Points.  Please see
Kim's email below.

Could you please speak with each of them and reiterate that they must
specifically reference "CAISO" energy in their Confirmations if that is the
product we told them that we would buy or sell?

Bob- I will call you later on this afternoon about Pacificorp. We got 2 more
Confirms today with "CAISO" stricken through.

Thanks in advance guys,

Shari Stack
Enron North America, Legal Department
Tel: (713) 853-9477

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 02:45 PM -----

	Kim S Theriot
	07/27/2000 02:23 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power Brokers-CAISO Reference

The following are Brokers and their respective back office contacts:

Prebon                Angie Martinez at 201-557-5999
example:              Trade Date: 7/25/00 reference  #254667 and  #254543.

Natsource Sherry Fountain 212-896-2154
example: Trade Date 7/26/00, their ref # 1297561221

Tradition  Dana Enright 203-316-2678
example: Trade Date 7/25/00, their ref # E58505S

Optimum Kirsty  403-215-8162
example: Trade Date 7/26/00, their ref # 07304

Altra                      Jennifer Barrett   713-210-8279
exmple:                Trade Date 6/23/00  ref#14085

Amerex                Chad (Broker)     281-634-9020
Amerex specifies "Firm CAISO Energy WSPP Schedule C with liquidating
damages"

Bloomberg           Karen Kingsbury  212-893-3233
  Trade Date 7/26/00, ref. # 20000726400002

We will bring you copies of the Broker Statements above.  Let me know if you
need anything else.

Kim


Hi Edie,

Can you add these slides to the Texas Gas Plan Presentation for 2001 behind
pg. 10.

Call with questions.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 04:34 PM
---------------------------

Bruce Sukaly@ENRON
02/12/2001 04:31 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Slides

Have Edie attach these to Tom's presentation.


Yesterday, Assemblymen Wright introduced Bill AB 31 X , which seems to be
sponsored by the CA Manufacturers and Tech Association.

It does the following:

1.  broadens emergency variances from air quality reqmts for power plants
under certain conditions
2. Orders CPUC to allow exisiting interruptible customers to participate in
PX and ISO markets.
3. Continues ex interruptible programs through 12//31/03 (currently 3/31/02),
gives annual opt out period.
4. Kicks in an immediate "bridge program" for certain existing customers (>
500 kv) with a rate credit.

It's not our demand buy-down proposal, but it's going in the right direction.
Looks good but we need to be sure that DA customers qualify for the
interruptible programs

Proposed Bill on DG below -- is a pot pourri

Probably too  much in it to fly as is.

Sponsored by "Real Energy" ( not a positive) and MAY be carried by Alpert. I
offered to work with the sponsor.

----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/06/2001 11:32 AM -----

	Julia Wright <jwright@smithandkempton.com>
	02/06/2001 09:24 AM

		 To: "'Aaron Thomas'" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "'Allan Lippincott'"
<alippin@mail.arco.com>, "'Ann Cohn (e-mail)'" <cohnap@sce.com>, "'Ann Watson
(e-mail)'" <anw@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'Anna Ferrera (e-mail)'"
<Anna.Ferrera@SEN.CA.GOV>, "'Art Carter (e-mail)'" <debinorton@aol.com>,
"'assistant to John Fielder'" <moravekj@sce.com>, "Audra Hartmann (E-mail)"
<ath@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'Barbara Barkovich (e-mail)'"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Becky Kilbourne (e-mail)'"
<bakilbourne@calpx.com>, "'Bill Booth (e-mail)'" <wbooth@booth-law.com>,
"'Bill Dombrowski (e-mail)'" <cra@calretailers.com>, "'Bill Keese (e-mail)'"
<wkeese@energy.state.ca.us>, "'Bill Zobel (e-mail)'" <bzobel@mail.arco.com>,
"'Bob Foster (e-mail)'" <fosterrg@sce.com>, "'Bob Houston (e-mail)'"
<houstgrp@pacbell.net>, "Brian Kelly (E-mail)" <brian.kelly@sen.ca.gov>,
"'Carolyn McIntyre (e-mail)'" <cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "'Catherine Hackney
(e-mail)'" <hacknece@sce.com>, "'Charles Bacchi (e-mail)'"
<charles.bacchi@asm.ca.gov>, "'Dan Carroll (e-mail)'" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>,
"'Delaney Hunter'" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Delbert Fore (E-mail)"
<fore.delbert@epenergy.com>, "'Denice Cazalet (e-mail)'" <dcazalet@apx.com>,
"'Dennis Price (e-mail)'" <priced@epenergy.com>, "'Denny Samuel (e-mail)'"
<dsam@chevron.com>, "'Dominic DiMare (e-mail)'"
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "'Dorothy Rothrock (email)'"
<drothrock@cmta.net>, "'Ed Yates (e-mail)'" <ed@clfp.com>, "'Eloy Garcia
(e-mail)'" <egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "'Evelyn Elsesser (e-mail)'"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "'Gary Heath (e-mail)'" <gheath@eob.ca.gov>, "'Gordon
McDonald (e-mail)'" <gordon.mcdonald@pacificorp.com>, "Greg Hardy (E-mail)"
<hardygl@texaco.com>, "'Jack Flanigan (e-mail)'"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "'Jack Gualco (e-mail)'"
<Jackson_Gualco@gualcogroup.com>, "'Jack Stewart (email)'"
<jstewart@cmta.com>, "'James Boyd (e-mail)'" <jim@resources.ca.gov>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (e-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jeannie Cain (E-mail)"
<jeanne.cain@calchamber.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (e-mail)'"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Jerry Jordan (e-mail)'" <jordan@cmua.org>, "'Jim
Groniger (e-mail)'" <gronign@texaco.com>, "'Joe Lyons (e-mail)'"
<joseph.lyons@asm.ca.gov>, "'Joe Ronan (e-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John
Bridges (e-mail)'" <bridgesj@epenergy.com>, "'John Fielder (e-mail)'"
<fielderjr@sce.com>, "'John Fistolera (e-mail)'" <johnf@ncpa.com>, "'John
Larrea (e-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Rozsa (e-mail)'"
<John.Rozsa@sen.ca.gov>, "'John White (e-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
"'Joseph Alamo'" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Julia Wright'" <jwright@smithandkempton.com>, "'Karen
Edson (e-mail)'" <kedson@ns.net>, "'Karen Jarrell (e-mail)'"
<kjarrell@smurfit.com>, "'Karen Koyano (e-mail)'" <kykoyano@calpx.com>,
"'Karen Lindh (e-mail)'" <karen@klindh.com>, "'Karen Mills (e-mail)'"
<kmills@cfbf.com>, "'Kari harteloo (e-mail)'" <klc@aelaw.com>, "Kassandra
Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Kathy Brandenburg (e-mail)'"
<katherinebrandenburg@flaniganlaw.com>, "'Kay Grosulak (e-mail)'"
<kgrosulak@sppc.com>, "'Keith McCrea (e-mail)'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "Kent
G. Smith (E-mail)" <ksmith@energy.state.ca.us>, "'Kevin Lynch (e-mail)'"
<Kevin.Lynch@pacificorp.com>, "'Kevin Smith (e-mail)'" <kevins@ncpa.com>,
"Kip Lipper (E-mail)" <kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "'Lawrence Lingbloom
(e-mail)'" <lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "'Lenny Goldberg (e-mail)'"
<iga@mother.com>, "'Louis Szablya (e-mail)'" <szablyal@epenergy.com>, "'Marc
Joseph (e-mail)'" <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>, "'Mark Monagan (Calpine)'"
<mrmonagan@aol.com>, "'Marwan Masri (e-mail)'" <mmasri@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'Mary McDonald (e-mail)'" <memcdonald@calpx.com>, "'Michael Alcantar
(e-mail)'" <mpa@aelaw.com>, "'Mike Florio (e-mail)'" <mflorio@turn.org>,
"'Mike Kahl (e-mail)'" <mikahl@ka-pow.com>, "'Mona Petrochko (e-mail)'"
<mpetroch@enron.com>, "'Pete Conaty (e-mail)'" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>, "Peter
Bray (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>, "'Phil Nails (e-mail)'"
<phil.nails@asm.ca.gov>, "Phil Stohr (E-mail)" <pstohr@dbsr.com>, "'Ralph
Cavanagh (e-mail)'" <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "'Randy Chinn (e-mail)'"
<randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "'Ray Thompson (e-mail)'"
<ray.thompson@sen.ca.gov>, "Richard Costigan III ESQ. (E-mail)"
<richard.costigan@asm.ca.gov>, "Richard Mesereau (E-mail)"
<richard.mesereau@asm.ca.gov>, "'Rick Counihan'"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "'Robert Berry (e-mail)'" <berry@apx.com>,
"'Robin Larson (e-mail)'" <rlarson@caiso.com>, "Roderick A. Campbell
(E-mail)" <roderick.campbell@asm.ca.gov>, "Scott Tomashefsky (E-mail)"
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>, "'Sheryl Carter (e-mail)'" <scarter@nrdc.org>,
"'Steve Pike (e-mail)'" <pikes@epenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Stu Wilson (e-mail)'" <swilson@cmua.org>, "'Sue
Mara (e-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Susan Reeder (e-mail)'"
<sreeder@sppc.com>, "'Terry Winter (e-mail)'" <twinter@caiso.com>, "'Thomas
Dinkel (e-mail)'" <tdinkel@retx.com>, "'Tim Schmelzer (e-mail)'"
<tschmelz@energy.state.ca.us>, "'Tommy Ross (e-mail)'" <rosst@sce.com>,
"'Tony Braun (e-mail)'" <braun@cmua.org>, "'Victoria Schaefer (e-mail)'"
<schaefvl@sce.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Documents for today's meeting

Julia B. Wright
Executive Assistant
(916) 446-5508
(916) 446-1499 fax
jwright@smithandkemtpon.com

D.J. Smith
President
(916) 446-5508
(916) 446-1499 fax
djsmith@smithandkempton.com

 - subscription protocols..doc
 - AB31X.pdf
 - Proposed Dg Leg (0126sg).doc


Joel, you can remove my name from the distribution list as I am no longer
working in the controls group.  I have moved over to gas trading and am
supporting one of the traders.  It's been great working with you and I'll be
sure to say hi when I visit London this fall.  Cheers.


Attached are revised staff notes that Stan uses at our Monday morning staff
meetings, for your information and reference.

Cindy


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000
12:14 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Susan Scott @ ENRON                           07/20/2000 10:28 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ENA Associate & Analyst Dinner

I believe this e-mail was intended for Susan Scott of ENA.  (I am with ET&S
Legal.)

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  David W Delainey                           07/19/2000 01:55 PM

Sent by: Beverly Stephens
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted C
Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A
Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evan Betzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Epstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Milind Pasad/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Barker
Varnell/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Claire
Broido/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvan Chaxel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Webb Jennings/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Banu Ozcan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Claudio
Ribeiro/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael M
Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Howton/HOU/ECT@ect,
Greg Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanton Ray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cooper Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Gregory/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Chetan Paipanandiker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Segura/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terrellyn
Parker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ENA Associate & Analyst Dinner

Please plan to attend a  reception and dinner for those Analysts and
Associates due to rotate in the near future who have made significant
contributions to Enron North America  The function will be hosted by the
Office of the Chairman at Cafe Annie located at 1728 Post Oak Blvd. on August
2,  2000.  The reception will start at 7:00pm with dinner to follow at
7:45pm.  Please RSVP to Ted Bland at ext. 3-5275 no later than close of
business Monday, July 31.  This will be an informal gathering to discuss the
progress of ENA and an open forum to interact with the management team on a
one on one basis.

See you on Wednesday.

Mark, Dave and John


I entered ($4.9951) x 12dt which should give them a credit on the invoice.  I
also entered a demand of $93835.00.  These items should show up seperate on
the invoice.


Jean has responded to Rick and I.  She doesn't feel that she has room in her
budget to pick up a partial headcount.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 02:33 PM -----

	Elyse Kalmans
	02/08/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Plan

Cindy and Steve:  Please see Kathy Mayfield's split responsibility proposal.
She initially discussed it with Jean Ryall at the beginning of January just
prior to the start of the legislative session.  Unfortunately, Jean has not
responded to Kathy's numerous inquiries.  As you can see, Community Relations
can use Kathy for United Way, but that will account for only 40% of her time,
with 60% designated for legislative/economic development activities under
Jean.  Please let me know your thoughts on how to proceed.  I am nervous
about a full-time role for Kathy should Jean not be interested in supporting
these activities and want to make sure that her talents are optimized for
Enron.

Elyse
---------------------- Forwarded by Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2001
03:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathy Mayfield                           02/08/2001 03:43 PM

To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Plan

Elyse, these are the dates that I communicated to Jean--just fyi.  Thanks,
Kathy

Met w/ Jean Ryall on Jan. 5
Sent proposal to Jean on Jan. 16
Follow-up email to Steve on Jan. 29
Follow-up email to Jean on Jan. 31
Numerous phone calls to Jean with no return calls  (actually, she called late
one night before the Inauguaration, but no response since then)


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 01:40 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	11/13/2000 01:28 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Steel Approvals 11/13/00

Regards,
bd


I hope be here.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: Boyt, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:13 PM
To: Keiser, Kam
Cc: Moon, Eric; Love, Phillip M.; Huan, George
Subject: RE: LGS Contact Booking

Kam,

I am fine with rescheduling the LGS meeting.  Are you guys available on Friday?

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Keiser, Kam
Sent: Wed 11/7/2001 8:14 PM
To: Boyt, Eric
Cc:
Subject: Declined: LGS Contact Booking

Eric,

Phillip and myself are in class all day tomorrow.  Can we reschedule again?

Kam


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven P South/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
02:20 PM ---------------------------

"Ledene, Ben" <BenLedene@aec.ca> on 01/22/2001 10:33:40 AM
To: "Steve South (E-mail)" <Steven.P.South@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Wild Goose Open Season

Steve, it was good seeing you again in Reno. Here is a copy of the package
that was sent out to Frank Ermis on January 12. If you have any questions,
please give me a call. Thanks. Ben.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ledene, Ben
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:02 PM
> To: Barry Brunelle (E-mail); Brad Barnds (E-mail); Brent Rook (E-mail);
> Craig Pentelichuk (E-mail); Dave Clare (E-mail); Dave Kohler (E-mail);
> David Ellis (E-mail); Denette Johnson (E-mail); Don Clements (E-mail);
> Frank Ermis (E-mail); Gary Venz (E-mail); Joseph Sestak (E-mail); Kevin E.
> Coyle (E-mail); Kevin Legg (E-mail); LoreLei Reid (E-mail); Monica Padilla
> (E-mail); Nathan Reinhardt (E-mail); Paul Gendron (E-mail); Ray McCluer
> (E-mail); Scott W. Walton (E-mail); Stephen J. Swain (E-mail); Susan Jones
> (E-mail); Tom Toerner (E-mail); Weaman Ng (E-mail)
> Cc: Chris Price (E-mail); Hogue, Bill; Amirault, Paul
> Subject: Wild Goose Open Season
>
> Long Term Firm Base Load Storage ("BLS") Service Open Season
>
> For service commencing April 1, 2001
>
> Customer offers required by 2:00 pm MST, Friday January 26, 2001
>
> Customer offers must be reasonably open for acceptance by Wild Goose
> Storage Inc. until 2:00 pm MST, Thursday February 1, 2001 subject only to
> significant changes in market conditions and final approval of customer's
> management. Preference for offer acceptance will be toward longer-term
> contracts (5 years) and offers, which exceed 100% of our rack rate. The
> offer sheets are provided in Microsoft Excel and are set up to calculate
> the percentage of rack rate for your convenience. It is the intent of Wild
> Goose Storage Inc. to negotiate and conclude contracts with the
> participants providing acceptable offers in this open season as close as
> possible to February 1, 2001. Wild Goose Storage Inc. reserves the right
> to not necessarily accept the highest priced offer nor to award all or any
> of the storage capacity available.
>
> A reasonable summary of the main terms and features of BLS service is
> attached for your convenience (Attached File - BLS Summary), but should
> not be used as the sole terms by which service is to be provided. All
> service is subject to the Tariff Schedules for Natural Gas Storage Service
> of Wild Goose Storage Inc., as approved by the Public Utilities Commission
> of the State of California.
>
> For more information about Wild Goose Storage Inc. or to download a copy
> of the entire tariff please refer to our web site at
> www.wildgoose-storage.com.
>
> Customer offers must include the following:
>
> A) Completed Offer Forms (Attached File - Offer Sheets) for each year of
> service including:
>
> * the amount of Inventory Capacity Required for each April to March
> period
> * the amount of Maximum Daily Injection Quantity Required by month
> * the amount of Maximum Daily Withdrawal Quantity Required by month
> * the Total Storage Demand Charge for each April to March period
> * the Injection Commodity Rate for each April to March period
> * the Withdrawal Commodity Rate for each April to March period
> * a signature from an authorized employee of the company verifying the
> offer for each April to March period
>
> In the 'Offer Sheets' file attachment you will find the following tabs at
> the bottom:
>
> * offer sheet for the first year of service April 1, 2001 to March 31,
> 2002 (see Service Restriction note below)
> * offer sheet for to be used for years 2 and beyond, please print out
> a copy for each April to March period
> * a manual offer sheet which can be printed out and filled in by hand
> * an example offer
>
> B) An executed Storage Services Agreement (Attached File - Storage
> Services Agreement) unless your company already has one on file with Wild
> Goose Storage Inc.
>
>
> Service Restriction
>
> Do to the volume of business already in place for the first year of
> service, there is a limited amount of Maximum Daily Injection Quantity
> available. Therefor for all offers will be limited to 10,000 Dth/day of
> Maximum Daily Injection Quantity during the period of April 1, 2001
> through March 31, 2002. All other terms of service are reasonably open for
> the first year and beyond.
>
> Rack Rates
> Our rates are 'market based' meaning they are fully negotiable, but our
> 'rack rates' are as follows:
> Monthly Storage Demand Charges
> * Inventory($/Dth) $0.03
> * Injection ($/Dth/day) $3.00
> * Withdrawal ($/Dth/day) $2.00
>
> Variable Charges
> * Injection Commodity Rate ($/Dth) $0.02
> * Withdrawal Commodity Rate ($/Dth) $0.02
>
> Fuel Charges
>
> In addition to the Demand and Variable charges described above, fuel costs
> are also charged based on actual consumption by customer and the value of
> the gas on a daily basis. Fuel consumption is expected to be between 1.25
> to 1.75%. For details, please refer to the Wild Goose tariff.
>
> If you have any questions about this matter or need hard copies, please
> contact either Ben Ledene at 403-266-8192 or Chris Price at (925)
> 243-0350.
>
>
>  <<Offer Sheets.xls>>  <<Wild Goose Open Season.doc>>  <<BLS Summary.doc>>
>  <<Storage Services Agreement.doc>>

 - Offer Sheets.xls
 - Wild Goose Open Season.doc
 - BLS Summary.doc
 - Storage Services Agreement.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
04:55 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           01/19/2001 04:46 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Data

Vince,
I have downloaded data for
- NYMEX prompt-month NG contract since 1996
- COB day-ahead power prices
- CINERGY day-ahead power prices

I am still looking for CalPX real-time prices.

Jason


the past is the past for you and your pansy homosexual dog.
you're a second-rate team now and i will prove it this weekend.
why don't you take your flea-infested ass to austin you UT
softie.  go carry chrissy sims' jock.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:13:28 -0600

>Win four/five/(or however many Pierre has won) championships
(against you
>pathetic fools) and then talk some smack.  Everybody, gets up for
playing
>Pierre and the toll this year has been rather exhausting for
Pierre...  now
>Pierre knows how UT feels, but mark Pierre's words.  Pierre will
be there
>come pay out time.
>
>May a golden shower and a flea infestation rain upon all of you
disgusting
>muts.
>
>Pierre
>The proud pure bred Maltese.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>To: <Frthis@aol.com>; <Wolphguy@aol.com>; <jeffu192@cs.com>;
><Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>; <shasta097@ev1.net>;
<ras1119@hotmail.com>;
><siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <john_riches@msn.com>;
<jramirez@othon.com>;
><homb1@pdq.net>; <klyn@pdq.net>; <djackson@rpsionline.com>
>Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:44 AM
>Subject: Re: Transactions
>
>
>Yaaaaaa, I guess he told you.  One game ahead of John...How
pathetic are
>you?
>
>>>> "John Riches" <john_riches@msn.com> 11/02/01 11:39AM >>>
>Kevin, I believe my lame ass is only one game behind you and your
sucky
>team.  Fear me.
>
>
>>From: "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net>
>>To: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>, <Frthis@aol.com>,
>><Wolphguy@aol.com>, <jeffu192@cs.com>, <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>,
>><shasta097@ev1.net>, <ras1119@hotmail.com>,
<siva66@mail.ev1.net>,
>><john_riches@msn.com>, <jramirez@othon.com>, <homb1@pdq.net>,
>><djackson@rpsionline.com>
>>Subject: Re: Transactions
>>Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:01:38 -0600
>>
>>DING DING DING            WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!
>>
>>Mr. Lame ass himself with the equally lame team.
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>>To: <Frthis@aol.com>; <Wolphguy@aol.com>; <jeffu192@cs.com>;
>><Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>; <shasta097@ev1.net>;
<ras1119@hotmail.com>;
>><siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <john_riches@msn.com>;
<jramirez@othon.com>;
>><homb1@pdq.net>; <klyn@pdq.net>; <djackson@rpsionline.com>
>>Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:50 AM
>>Subject: Re: Transactions
>>
>>
>>My guess would
>>be..............................................................J
ohn
>>
>> >>> "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net> 11/02/01 10:28AM >>>
>>Take a guess at the sucky team that has already made too many
transactions.
>>I'm sure you will not need more then one.
>>
>>Kevin
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>>To: <Frthis@aol.com>; <Wolphguy@aol.com>; <jeffu192@cs.com>;
>><Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>; <shasta097@ev1.net>;
<ras1119@hotmail.com>;
>><siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <john_riches@msn.com>;
<jramirez@othon.com>;
>><homb1@pdq.net>; <klyn@pdq.net>; <djackson@rpsionline.com>
>>Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:20 AM
>>Subject: Re: Transactions
>>
>>
>>Who picked up seven players already?  Their team must really
suck!!!  Has
>>anyone looked at the power rankings lately?  I will save you the
time...The
>>Hillrods are #1.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Bob 'that kid needs to learn that you don't bunt to break up a
no hitter
>>when down by two only runs' Brenley
>>
>>President of The Boung Houng Kim Fan Club
>>
>>This man's managing skills are about as good as his knowledge of
the so
>>called 'baseball etiquette'.  I think he should start Kim
Saturday &
>>Sunday.
>>
>>
>>
>> >>> "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net> 11/02/01 10:02AM >>>
>>Remember that you have a limited number of transactions
(Add/Drops) for the
>>year to make.  This does not include trades.  There is not a
limit to the
>>amount of trades you can make.  Since I managed to screw this up
already,
>>the limit will be increased from 7 to 8.  Use them wisely...
>>
>>Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


I'm trying to locate Matt right now to verify - but he has two identical
trades with TFS in his trade log. I'll let you know when I find out.

Stephanie Piwetz   02/23/2001 01:24 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: deal

Kate,

TFS just shows one trade with Matt motley, we have two entered 530551.01,
530557.01.
thanks

530263.01
Apb showed:  just ch cp to city of mcminnville > OKAY


Janet McDaniel
713-853-1936


FYI.  No action required.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 05:32
PM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/24/2001 05:26 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: SPA: Illinois Project Entities

Kay:

As we discussed, I have been working with a counterparty interested in
purchasing one or both of ENA's Illinois development project LLC's.  The
counterparty is listed below:
  PSEG Americas Development Company, L.L.C.
  35 Waterview Blvd.
  Parsippany, NJ  94105

The key points of the proposed transaction are:

1.  The transaction would be an outright purchase of 100% of the member
interests in one or both of the following project entities:

 Kendall New Century Development, L.L.C.
 Titan Land Development Company, L.L.C.

2.  The purchase price of 100% of the member interests would be:

 Kendall New Century Development, L.L.C.: $3,000,000.00
 Titan Land Development Company, L.L.C.: $6,000,000.00

Lisa Mellancamp was the ENA attorney who handled the CA between ENA and PSEG
before Christmas.  At the end of November, Lisa engaged Corey Brown at
Bracewell & Patterson to handle the preparation of a draft Securities
Purchase Agreement in conjunction with our discussions with Coastal Power.
Corey prepared a draft SPA based upon an option to purchase structure, but
Coastal Power backed away from the transaction in early December.

I have received a letter from PSEG Power LLC indicating their interest in
proceeding with a transaction in the near future.  I will forward you a copy
of this letter for your records.  They have verbally indicated that the
Purchase Price(s) of $3 MM and $6 MM respectively, are acceptable to them.

I believe that this is the appropriate time to bring you into the process and
transfer things from Lisa to yourself.  Please call me to discuss the SPA
once you have reviewed the appropriate documents.  I will be in Chicago
tomorrow.  I can be reached by cell at (713) 412-4612 or leave me a
voicemail.  I will be in the Houston office by noon on Friday.

Thanks,
Fred


I am so sorry to hear about your dad.  I did not know that he had passed
away.  I know that he has been very ill.  My thoughts are with you and your
family.  I know that it must hard to say goodbye to someone that has been
such a part of your life for so long.

We will miss you on the 11th, but certainly understand your absence.  --Sally

	From:  Jefferson D Sorenson                           01/05/2001 05:59 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: January 11 - Managing Operational Risk

Sally,
I will not be able to attend the January 11th meeting.  My dad's funeral is
that day in Washington D.C.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
01/05/2001 05:58 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           01/05/2001 05:57 PM

To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT, Diane H
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Spence/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S
Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT, Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica
Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joel
Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Vanessa Schulte/Corp/Enron, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard C McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd
Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Perun/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noor
Kaissi/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark J
Leskowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Snow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Thomason/NA/Enron@Enron, Bradley Samuelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sony
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nancy Hernandez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christy Lobusch/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: January 11 - Managing Operational Risk

Please join me on Thursday, January 11 from 1:00 to 4:00 pm for a special
information session for the Operations Management teams supporting Enron
Americas, Enron Global Markets and Enron Industrial Markets.   We will focus
on assessing, managing and mitigating operational risk.  Details on the
location for the meeting will be sent to you early next week.

I look forward to seeing everyone at this meeting on the 11th.  The things
that we will discuss will be important for each and every one of you as you
carry out your roles in 2001.  I hope that you will make every effort to
attend.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you have a conflict that
will keep you from attending the meeting.


Sara,

When we met a week or so ago we discussed shortening the Weather
confirmations to one page by amending the ISDA. I sent you the EOL GTC's and
was wondering how we are coming along on that project. The volume is really
growing and and it would help out greatly if we could get these to one page.

Thanks,

Jarrod


Sent notice to Williams. They imediately responded that they had credit issues and were waiting to hear from us about the letter of credit.


Gents, thanks for your help on this!  Ray


This is the preliminary spreadsheet for July. There will definitely be
another listing distributed no later than this Friday. For some reason there
has been an unusual number of notices issued and we are working diligently to
get the documents lined up.

Updates to records in GCP for counterparty name changes:

The legal name field will be updated Monday afternoon (7/17).

The ERMS Shortnames will be changed on Tuesday afternoon (7/18).


----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 07/13/2001 11:00 AM -----

	"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontiereconomics.com>
	07/13/2001 10:40 AM
	Please respond to seabron.adamson

		 To: <Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>
		 cc: "Sabine Schnittger" <sabine.schnittger@frontier-economics.com>
		 Subject: RE: Outline for affidavit re: June 19th Order

Here is the attachment...

My error

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

 - Outline response June 19 FERC Order.doc


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - Daily Price Sheet.xls


Real Time deals typically don't get confirmed; however, Chris Foster's generation customers have requested that we confirm their deals, whether day-ahead or hour-ahead.

For us, this means we need to pay special attention to the box marked "Confirmation" when entering deals. I know you're all in the habit of marking "No" under this designation, so review the following counterparty names carefully and commit them to memory, because deals with these generators NEED TO BE CONFIRMED.

	Harbor Cogeneration
	Delano Energy
	Atlantic Richfield Co.
	Sierra Forest Products
	Wheelabrator Martell
	Wheelabrator Shasta
	Sierra Pacific Holding Co.
	Gas Recovery Systems
	East Bay MUD

Attached is a list of these counterparty names and corresponding contact information. Feel free to print this out and keep it in a nearby notebook.

Please let Chris or me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kate


Jeff, the quick scoop on Larry Drivon is that he is a graduate of  Stanford
and and San Francisco Law School.? He's from Stockton and a  former San
Joaquin County DA.? He's also a retired San Joaquin County  judge -- I don't
know if that was?a full-time elected position or  whether he would be on call
to serve as caseloads determine.? He was  president of the California Trial
Lawyers Association (now California  Association of Consumer Attorneys)
around 1990 and is currently chairman  of the board of trustees of Humphreys
School of Law in Stockton.
?
He's been involved in at least a?couple of high profile case in  the Central
Valley, including the case against Ford detailed in the  articles below
(apparently, the verdict was later overturned due to juror  misconduct and a
TV show tainted the $290 million verdict).? He was  also involved in a highly
publicized case in which the Catholic  Diocese?of Stockton?was ordered to pay
$30 million as the result  of molestations by a priest.
?
He's well known in trial lawyer circles, and has been a leader in  CTLA/CAOC
for years.? I'm sure that includes working hard to raise  funds for
atttorney-backed initiatives (including insurance issues) and  candidates.?
?
I'll try to get some more substantive info ASAP.
?
Ken
?
?
?
?
From the Texas tort reform assn. publication:
?
Astronomical damage awards set a bad precedent

?		by JIM LAFFERTY 		?
?		Lubbock Avalanche Journal ??Saturday, November 13,  1999		?
?		?		?
?		[IMAGE]E-Mail this  article???[IMAGE]Printer-friendly version		?
?		?		?
?		MODESTO, Calif. - Now high is up? ?
		?
		That's the  question that thousands of giddy personal injury lawyers are
asking  themselves in the wake, of two astronomical punitive damage awards
handed  out by California juries within three days of each other in July.  ?
		?
		In one of the judgments, Modesto jurors ordered Ford  Motor Co. to pay $290
million in punitive damages to a young man whose  mother, father and brother
were killed when he tipped over his 1978 Bronco  on Father's Day 1993. ?
		?
		At the time of the accident,  Juan Ramon Romo, then 19, had been driving for
a lengthy period of time,  so long, in fact, that everyone else in the Bronco
- his mother and  father, a brother and two sisters had fallen asleep. Going
slightly over  the speed limit on an interstate highway, Romo attempted
illegally to pass  another vehicle on the right. ?
		?
		When the other driver  decided to move back into the right lane, Romo swerved
left and rolled  over. His mother, father and brother were killed; he and his
two sisters  survived. ?
		?
		The $290 million judgment in the Romo case  was the second largest ever
entered against a U.S. car manufacturer, yet  it received little media
attention outside the immediate Modesto area.  ?
		?
		Hardly surprising, perhaps, since only three days  before a Las Angeles jury
had set the punitive damage bar impossibly high  by ordering General Motors
to pay a staggering punitive damage award of  $4.9 billion. ?
		?
		By way of a yardstick, that amount  surpasses the combined Gross National
Product of Afghanistan and Albania.  Almost obscured by the astonishing
generosity of the jurors in Los Angeles  and Modesto, was a salient point
that still sends shivers through  corporate defense lawyers around the
country: By any objective criteria,  neither Ford nor General Motors appeared
to bear any responsibility for  the accidents. ?
		?
		In the Los Angeles case, Patricia  Anderson, her four children and a family
friend were stopped at a red  light in her 1979 Chevy Malibu on Christmas Eve
1993. A drunken driver  traveling at 70 mph slammed his car into the Malibu's
rear end. The  collision ruptured the Malibu's gas tank and ignited the
spilled fuel.  Mrs. Anderson's four children suffered severe burns.  ?
		?
		When police tested the drunken driver he registered a  blood alcohol content
of 0.20 - twice the legal limit for drivers in  California. ?
		?
		Similarly, in the Modesto case, driver  error and misjudgment on the part of
Romo clearly appeared to be the cause  of the accident. ?
		?
		But Romo's lawyer, Lawrence Drivon,  immediately blamed the deaths on the
Bronco, which he said was susceptible  to rollover, and had a defectively
designed roof. ?
		?
		Yet  the Bronco exceeded all federal safety standards for roof strength in
1978  by more than 100 percent and, in fact, exceeds the 1999 standard by
more  than 30 percent. ?
		?
		Romo's Bronco also exceeded all  federal rollover standards for 1978 model.,
and federal accident data show  the Ford Broncos rollover rate was no higher
than that of other SUVs.  ?
		?
		It's open to question whether the Bronco had been  properly maintained prior
to the accident. The vehicle had been on the  road for 15 years, had numerous
changes in ownership and had nearly  200,000 miles on the odometer. ?
		?
		In addition, Drivon  engaged in conduct that borders on jury tampering -
mailing to each juror  a copy of his book, 'The Civil War on Consumer
Rights," whose main thesis  is that large American corporations, like Ford,
are attempting to close  "the courthouse doors" to average Americans by
pressing for judicial  reforms. In the book, Drivon devotes an entire chapter
to Ford's alleged  misdeeds. ?
		?
		In part because of Drivon's behavior, a  California judge granted Ford's
motion to set aside the punitive damage  part of the verdict and ordered a
new trial. Among other things, he cited  improper discussions among the
jurors that prejudiced deliberations.  ?
		?
		But Ford could be entering double jeopardy with a new  trial. Drivon has
indicated he will seek to raise the initial punitive  award threefold to more
than $1 billion. With a sympathetic jury, that  could happen. ?
		?
		Damage award, of a few hundred million  here and a few hundred million there
are still unusual, but California is  a national trendsetter. ?
		?
		If juries elsewhere start  emulating the ones in Los Angeles and Modesto, our
now booming economy  could well begin to sputter. ?
		_______________________________  ?
		?
		Jim Lafferty is a former Associated Press and  Philadelphia Daily News
reporter who now covers national and international  Legal trends as an
independent journalist in Washington. Readers may  e-mail him at
jameslafferty@usa.net.  ?
		?

		[IMAGE]

		California Delivers Second Huge Verdict Against Auto Industry in  Just Three
Days

		$295 Million for Three Children Orphaned in Ford Bronco  Crash

		By Christa  Zevitas

		At-A-Glance
		Size of verdict: $295  million
		$290 million in punitive damages
		$5 million in  compensatory damages
		Status: Punitive award overturned  and new trial pending.
		State: California
		Date of  Verdict: July 12, 1999
		Length of Trial: 3 months
		Length of Deliberations: 1 week
		Case Name:  Romo v. Ford Motor Co.
		Court: Stanislaus County Superior  Court, Modesto, Calif.
		Plaintiffs' Lawyers: Joseph W.  Carcione Jr. of Law Offices of Joseph
Carcione in Redwood City,  Calif. (10 lawyers); Laurence Drivon of Drivon &
Tabak in  Stockton, Calif. (4 lawyers)
		Defense Lawyers: Frank Kelly  of Dryden, Margoles, Schimaneck, Hartman, Kelly
& Wait in San  Francisco; Douglas Seitz of Snell & Wilmer in Phoenix, Ariz.;
Gary S. Davis of Davis, Echols & Boyd in Modesto, Calif. (6  lawyers)

		Just three days after a Los Angeles jury hammered General Motors  with the
largest verdict of the year, another California jury  slammed Ford Motor Co.
with the year's fifth-largest verdict.

		The Modesto jury awarded $295 million to three children whose  parents and
brother died when their 1978 Ford Bronco rolled over in  a highway accident.
The verdict included $290 million in punitive  damages - the second largest
punitive award ever against an  automaker.

		The defense argued that the drivers of the two vehicles - not the  company -
were responsible for the tragedy. But a 12-person jury  found the automaker
78% liable for the deaths, concluding that Ford  chose to save money by
opting for a less sturdy roof design. The  jury divided the remaining
liability between the two drivers.

		A company spokesman told The Modesto Bee that "as tragic as [the  accident]
was, it wasn't our fault, and it wasn't the vehicle's  fault."

		Lawyers for neither the plaintiff nor the defendant could be  reached for
comment. This story is based on local newspaper and wire  stories from the
time of the verdict.

		Bronco Rolls Over

		On June 20, 1993, 19-year-old Juan Romo was driving five other  family
members home to northern California when he attempted to pass  a van on the
right at approximately 50 mph. The van's driver didn't  see Romo and changed
lanes at the same time, forcing Romo to swerve  hard to the right to avoid
him. Romo then overcorrected with a hard  turn to the left, lost control and,
while traveling about 47 mph,  the vehicle rolled over - killing Romo's
mother, Salustia, 40; his  father, Ramon, 39; and his brother, Ramiro, 16.

		Romo's parents and brother were all wearing their seatbelts and  died because
the Bronco's roof smashed straight down onto the  dashboard and crushed their
heads, according to plaintiffs'  attorneys.

		Juan and his two sisters - Evangelina, 14, and Maria, 8 -  suffered only
minor injuries. Plaintiffs' attorney Joseph Carcione  Jr. told The Modesto
Bee that the sisters survived because they  weren't wearing their seatbelts
and were thrown from the Bronco.  Romo survived because he ducked below the
dashboard, said Carcione,  name partner in a 10-lawyer firm in Redwood City,
Calif.

		Romo and his sisters sued Ford, alleging that the automaker knew  the
Bronco's roof - which was two-thirds plastic - would not hold up  in a
rollover. Carcione and his co-counsel, Laurence Drivon, argued  that Ford
knew the roof was unsafe, but decided to save the  relatively small cost of
reinforcing it with steel - a defect the  company corrected in post-1979
model years.

		According to a press release, Carcione described the roof as a  camper top.
To manufacture the vehicle, Ford basically chopped off  the back portion of a
1978 pickup truck and stuck on the plastic  camper top, put a bench seat in
the back and removed a warning that  had been posted on the camper top that
said, "Do Not Ride Under This  Camper Top," Carcione said in the release.

		The plaintiffs' attorneys also contended that the Bronco was  unsafe because
it was prone to rollover. The vehicle's rollover rate  is three to five times
higher than any other passenger car and its  rollover death rate is almost
three times greater than the 1980-1996  model Broncos, they say in a press
release.

		Although Carcione and Drivon lacked explicit documentation to  illustrate the
Bronco's structural weaknesses, they filled that gap  with a prize witness -
former Ford executive vice president Tom  Feeney, who testified that company
officials were aware that the  roof was virtually certain to fail in a
rollover. Feeney gave  additional testimony that in the 27 years he had
worked for the  company, the Bronco was the worst vehicle Ford ever put out
in terms  of crashworthiness.

		Ford countered that the Bronco was perfectly sound and met all  federal
safety standards, noting that Feeney had "never worked in  truck product
development."

		Defense attorneys also argued that Romo was at fault, and that  his
right-hand passing maneuver was illegal. They contended that the  van's
driver was also partly to blame.

		On July 12, 1999, the jury awarded the Romo family $5 million in
compensatory damages and $290 million in punitives.

		At the close of the three-month trial, the plaintiffs' attorneys  urged
jurors to award punitives totaling $1 billion. They noted  after the trial
that the $296 million award amounts to only 10 days  worth of Ford's net
profits.

		Drivon, partner in a four-lawyer firm in Stockton, Calif., also  called the
Bronco the most dangerous vehicle Ford ever made.

		"The American public is waking up to the carnage that's being  visited upon
the public by some American industries such as tobacco  and automobiles," he
told the Associated Press.

		New Trial Pending

		Following the verdict, defense attorneys asked for a mistrial  claiming that
Romo's counsel made inflammatory public statements  supporting the $4.9
billion GM verdict, which came down while jurors  in his own case were still
in deliberations. The motion was denied.

		Ford appealed, and on Sept. 15, the trial judge ordered a new  trial on
punitives, finding that the case was tainted by juror  misconduct.

		One juror told others of a 60 Minutes II segment about Ford  Mustangs and
fuel-tank fires, and told them it was "evidence of  Ford's malice regarding
the 1978 Bronco," wrote Superior Court Judge  Roger Beauchesne. Another juror
told the jury of "a morbid  nightmare" she had in which her child and other
jurors' children  were killed in a Bronco rollover while being taunted by
Ford  attorneys, the judge wrote. Beauchesne said the two jurors' comments
may have influenced the deliberations and noted that the jury vote  on
punitive damages was 9-3, the exact majority needed.

		The Wall Street Journal reported that Carcione said he's  "delighted" to try
the case again.

		"Reversing the $290 million award was no victory for Ford. The  next jury
will award even higher damages," said Carcione in a press  release. "Four of
the jurors in the last trial wanted to assess  punitive damages at a billion
dollars or more. The $290 million  amount was reached as a compromise."

		Drivon echoed Carcione's thoughts.

		"Sooner of later, Ford will have to accept what 12 American  jurors will
continue to say: That this Bronco is the result of  malicious actions by Ford
who willfully put profits ahead of  people," he said in a press release.

		Beauchesne upheld the jury's unanimous finding that the Bronco's  defective
roof caused the deaths of Romo's family members.

		While Ford expressed its gratitude at the new punitives trial, it  may appeal
the compensatory damage award as well as the jury's  finding of liability.

		According to wire reports, Drivon advised Ford not to celebrate
prematurely.

		"The best they get out of this is that they're exposed to the  verdict of a
second jury," he told the Associated Press.

		, 2000 Lawyers Weekly Inc., All Rights  Reserved

 - email.gif
 - print.gif
 - ehhot2.gif


Constellation Energy Group, Inc. has added a News Release to its Investor Relations web site.  For a complete listing of our News Releases visit:  http://investor.constellationenergy.com/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=ceg&script=40 0    Title:  Nashville Selects Constellation Energy Source for New District Energy System Date:  2/4/2002

This email alert service uses proprietary JoinMail list management software provided by CCBN. To learn more about JoinMail, visit the CCBN Website @: www.ccbn.com

To unsubscribe from this JoinMail list, please click on the link below and send a blank reply:   U-B2.9064.110607.paulzQ4dzQ4thomaszQ2enronzQ4com@joinmail.ccbn.com


This request has been pending approval for  7 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078941&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078941
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:30:56 AM
Requested For       : punit.rawal@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Michael is sick, so he's at home, and taking him to the doctor.  More strep.
My baby had 103 temperature last night.  He was so pathetic.  I will probably
stay home tomorrow.

Kay


Kathy,
I'm still working to get authorization to create hierarchy in Risktrac, in the meantime can you create the hierarchies?  I think in NETCO we are going to do away with the Burton McIntyre function and have it reside at risk level, this way it is done correctly.   Ramesh is working to provide a separate Risktrac system for NETCO in which to create the hierarchy.

Ramesh, would it be ok for now to have the Risk function create a NETCO hierarchy in Risktrac then copy that hierarchy over into NETCO  once the "clean" version was complete?

Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Reeves, Kathy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:00 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Hedstrom, Peggy
Subject:	FW: NETCO Portfolio Book Structure

Frank,
Here is the structure for Alberta Power for NETCO

TRADING PORTFOLIO
NETCO Business Unit
	Power Trading
		Canada Power
			John Zufferli
				Alberta Long Term Power
				Alberta Long Term Gas - Price
				Alberta Long Term Gas - Basis
				Alberta Long Term Gas - Gas Daily
			Cooper Richie
				Alberta Short Term Power
				Alberta Hourly Power
				Alberta Short Term Power - Gas Daily

COMMODITY PORTFOLIO
NETCO Business Unit
	Gas
		Gas Power
			Canada
				Alberta
	Power
		Power Power
			Canada
				Alberta

CURVE PORTFOLIO GROUPED REGIONALLY
NETCO Business Unit
	Power
		Alberta
			Alberta Power Pool

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hedstrom, Peggy
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:59 PM
To:	Gillis, Brian; Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	FW: NETCO Portfolio Book Structure

\Let's meet at 1:30 in the Energy Operations boardroom to discuss.
Thanks
Peggy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:55 PM
To:	Hedstrom, Peggy; White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Postlethwaite, John
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Port, David; Ramesh, Ganapathy
Subject:	NETCO Portfolio Book Structure

In considering setting up books for NETCO,  RAC needs the following:  (I recognize portfolio name choice may not be optimal)
1.	Ownership of ERMS and Enpower
o	For Canada, it would probably be best if ownership resided in Houston (Peggy, any feedback would be helpful)
2.	Recognizing that portfolio hierarchy may need to be augmented pending buyers request, I recommend three portfolio structures.
o	Trading portfolio (heterogeneous, incl. everything traders trade) - 2 portfolio's (power & gas) aggregated under NETCO total
?	Trader (sub portfolio by risk type) , regional, parent portfolio  (includes all commodities in traders portfolio)
?	Example
?	NETCO Business Unit
o	Gas Trading
?	Financial Desk
?	Arnold
o	Price
o	Basis
o	Exotics
o	Power Trading
?	East Power
?	Presto
o	Long term
o	Short term
o	Commodity portfolio Gas and Power (homogenous)
?	Example
?	NETCO Business Unit
o	Gas
?	Gas Power
?	East
?	West
o	Northwest
o	Southwest
?	Gas Gas
?	Financial
?	West
?	Etc.
o	Power
?	Power Gas
?	Power Power
o	Curve portfolio grouped regionally - This portfolio does not currently exist.
?	Starts with curves, regional, root portfolio, parent
?	Example
?	NETCO Business Unit
o	Gas
?	Northeast
?	Transco Z6
?	etc
o	Power
?	Northeast
?	NEPOOL
?	Etc.

Additionally, we need to correct curve shift reporting in Risktrac as well as bench mark positions.  In the past Canada was "grandfathered" under its legacy transactions, but under NETCO there should not be any legacy deals and as such Canada needs to report its risk the same as we do in Houston.  PortCalc may need to be modified to handle currency issues and other as well as new curves may need to be created.  When creating new curves, please copy in ERMS 90 days worth of price history so that we can measure VAR.

I apologize if this is vague, please feel free to provide feedback.

Thanks
Frank


Tuesday works better for me Maurice, my flight does not arrive into Houston until 6:00pm tonight. As far as a time for Tuesday, I would say anytime after 10:00 am would be open on my schedule.
                                                      Chris

:-----Original Message-----
From: Winter, Maurice
Sent: Mon 6/18/2001 7:46 AM
To: Bresnan, Neil
Cc: Frazier, Michael; Stokley, Chris
Subject: Re: Load Forecasting access to MV90 interval data

Neil,

Pat is meeting with the CAISO auditors all afternoon, but I have asked if she can give us some time after 5pm.  If she is not available, what time tommorow morning is good for you? Chris and Micheal?

Also, I have attached the CSC systems drawing that I spoke of in our last meeting.

Maurice

<<CES System Overview 001102.bmp>>

        Enron Energy Services

From:  Neil Bresnan                           06/15/2001 08:04 AM

To:     Michael Frazier/HOU/EES@EES

cc:     Maurice Winter/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:        Re: Load Forecasting access to MV90 interval data

Maurice,

I have PRC Monday.  If we have the meeting with Pat at 4 PM I should be able to make it.

Please send me an e-mail to confirm the time and location.

NFB

Michael Frazier

06/14/2001 07:09 PM

To:     Maurice Winter/HOU/EES@EES

cc:     Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Gregg Young/HOU/EES@EES, James Light/HOU/EES@EES

Subject:        Re: Load Forecasting access to MV90 interval data

Sounds like a feasible solution to me as long as we can get specified formats and the data uploads are well-maintained by CSC.  Are there any extra costs on their end for performing this posting function?

mrf

Maurice Winter

06/14/2001 08:51 AM

To:     Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Stokley/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Frazier/HOU/EES@EES

cc:     Gregg Young/HOU/EES@EES, James Light/HOU/EES@EES

Subject:        Load Forecasting access to MV90 interval data

All,

I spoke with Pat Priestley this morning about our request to get access to the MV90 daily interval meter data for load forecasting.  She said that she would not be available to meet formally until Monday due to the declared disaster at their operations due to the flood.  She said they are moving back to the Pennzoil building today and Friday, so things should be close to normal by Monday.

Pat said that it is not be a problem to export the MV90 data (in just about any format) on a daily basis for us.  The data is housed in MV90 databases which , according to Pat, can only be read by an MV90 system; so we would need to purchase MV90 (very expensive) if we wanted to read the data directly.

I suggest we get the data exported daily from CSC to an FTP site at Enron, because they can manage the process on a daily basis.  We can sweep the FTP site daily and have it automatically imported into our databases.

If we are in agreement with this solution, I  will create an emergency work request with CSC to begin working on this immediately.

Maurice


This request has been pending your approval for  17 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000061279&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000061279
Request Create Date : 9/20/01 11:47:26 AM
Requested For       : elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Resource Name       : Live Link CORP
Resource Type       : Applications


One more Bill,

The sale to PSCO HE 14-19  35MWH should be @ $220.00 per Tony and PSCO.

Thanks,

Kathy


put on calendar.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
10:36 AM ---------------------------

Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org> on 10/03/2000 10:06:44 AM
Please respond to Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org>
To: Edward Allen <eallen@eagleglobal.com>, Bernard Arocha <barocha@msn.com>,
Ellie Beard <ecabeard@aol.com>, Toni Beauchamp <TONIBEAUCHAMP@YAHOO.COM>,
Fran Berg <fberg@swbell.net>, Deborah Brochstein <deborah@brochsteins.com>,
Brad Bucher <brad@gcchem.com>, Jeff Daly
<jeffrey.f.daly@us.arthurandersen.com>, Chadwick Dodd <cdodd@Jwortham.com>,
Sara Dodd <sfpdodd@aol.com>, Stephen Finley <steve.finley@bakerhughes.com>,
Heidi Gerger <HMG60@aol.com>, William Goldberg <wgoldberg@kpmg.com>, John
Guess <jfguess@usa.net>, Dana Harper <danarharper@aol.com>, Rachel Hecker
<ritexdog@aol.com>, Bruce Herzog <bherzog@velaw.com>, Louise Jamail
<RobotRob@aol.com>, Jill Jewett <TheJewetts@msn.com>, Leonard Jones
<ljones@rfp-co.com>, "I.H. Kempner III" <ihkempner@imperialsugar.com>, Carmen
Knapp <sailby2@aol.com>, Elwyn Lee <ECLee@uh.edu>, Marley Lott
<marley_lott@bakerbotts.com>, Ginni Mithoff <gmithoff@infohwy.com>, Evi Newar
<EviNew@aol.com>, Roy Nolen <roy.nolen@bakerbotts.com>, Robert Palmquist
<robert.p.palmquist@us.arthurandersen.com>, Annise Parker
<aparker@cnl.ci.houston.tx.us>, Jeff Shankman <jshankm@enron.com>, Charles
Smith <RSMCES@aol.com>, Reginald Smith <rsmith@kslaw.com>, Stephen Susman
<ssusman@susmangodfrey.com>, Laura Walls <lmorwalls@aol.com>, Kenneth
Williams <kmwilliams@frostbank.com>, Michael Zilkha <michael@zilkha.com>
cc:
Subject:

Just a reminder that the next meeting of the Contemporary Arts Museum's Board
of Trustees is Monday, November 20, 2000, 4 pm, Cullen Education Resource
Center.

Please RSVP via return email, fax (713.284.8275) or phone (713.284.8253)
whether or not you can attend the Board meeting on November 20.

Thanks.


Good Morning,

We will be rolling out a new version of Deal Entry & Deal Blotter this
afternoon to support California scheduling & volume management.  For most of
the users, there will be no impact except for a few new fields that can be
ignored in Enpower's Deal Entry.  Below is a list of the changes:

Deal Entry (These fields should only be populated for California deals)
1.  Added Settlement Entity - Identifies where the power is scheduled and
settled.

2.  Added Sched Coordinator - Identifies the coordinator responsible for
scheduling the power.

3.  Schedule Type - Defines the type of schedule used in California.

4.  Market Reference - Defines the market when the power will flow.

Deal Blotter
1.  Deal Blotter will be defaulting these 4 values if the deal is in
California.

Thanks,  David Poston


I am hearing that it may be premature to do an ISDA energy conference in
Tokyo because almost all the products being discussed so far are physical.
What do you think?

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 08:47 AM -----

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	12/13/2000 01:22 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, rainslie@isda.org@ECT, Jonathan
Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark
Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Energy Seminar in Japan

Hi Mark,

There will be a one-day WRMA conference here (Morten Erik and Mark Tawney are
involved in these arrangements and Mr. Wani, lawyer of local derivative fame
will be talking at the conference) in late Feb or early March.  Date will be
fixed later this week, likely to be March 5.

Jane

	Mark E Haedicke@ECT
	2000/12/13 07:38

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: rainslie@isda.org
		 Subject: Energy Seminar in Japan

Jane:

ISDA is planning an energy seminar in Tokyo in mid-May.  We have heard there
may be an energy seminar in March or April in Tokyo.  Have you heard of the
earlier seminar?  We are trying to decide whether it makes sense to go
forward on the May seminar.  Could you look into this and talk to the traders.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,

Mark


green bay and chic under 39


yes, that's fine

Fletch


Customers we will start to de-DASR probably next week.  VERY CONFIDENTIAL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hughes, Evan
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan; Herndon, Rogers; Gresch, Robert; Apollo, Beth; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Subject:	FW: CA De-DASR's

This is the list we had Thursday last week.  Please let me know if you need more information.

Thanks,

Evan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hughes, Evan
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan; Herndon, Rogers; Gresch, Robert; Apollo, Beth; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Subject:	CA De-DASR's

The attached list details the California De-DASR status (by customer) as of this afternoon.  This list was prepared using the prior guidance of "...all customers pre-June/August with the exception of PacTel, IBM and UC/CSU".

Please note that there are two tabs to the spreadsheet.  fyi -- You need to scroll to the bottom of the EESO List to see those customers that are not "qued".

We are prepared to launch the De-DASR's but want to confirm via this message that everyone agrees with each individual customer status.

Please give me a call if you need additional information -- or have any edits or changes.

Thanks,

Evan


Enron is proud to be a Charity Partner Sponsor for the 2001 Shell Houston
Open being held April 16-22 on the Tournament Players Course at The
Woodlands.  The Shell Houston Open ranks No. 2 among PGA TOUR tournaments
with charitable donations of $4.5 million.  While today,s top players are
entertaining you, remember the net proceeds of the tournament will benefit
more than 300 local worthy charities in need of a helping hand.

Attached is a list of available tickets, parking passes and various
invitations, along with a schedule of events.

To order tickets, please follow the procedures listed below:

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING SHELL HOUSTON OPEN TICKETS
1)  Send an E-MAIL request to LAURA PENA with the following information:
 a)  Name of Requester
 b)  Title of Requester
 c)  Company
 d)  Department
 e)  Location
 f)   Telephone
 g)  List of items and quantity of each (please notice tickets are limited)
2)  Distribution is on a first-come, first-served basis. THE ONLY TICKETS
LEFT FOR THE SKY BOX ARE FOR WEDNESDAY-NO OTHER SKY BOX TICKETS   ARE
AVAILABLE.
3)  NO PHONE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED

Please keep in mind the sole purpose for these tickets is to entertain our
valued customers. Your cost centers will not be charged for the tickets.

If you have any questions, please contact:
 Laura Pena  (713) 853-5376
 Dorie Hitchcock  (713) 853-6978

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/shelldescript.doc


I'm a little confused.  Do I need to contact Gary Bode to (1) get Brent and
the Buenos Aires legal team access to the current Lotus Master Swaps
Database, or (2) get the software developed for Brent to copy the database to
create a document tracking database for the Argentina legal contracts, or (3)
both?


John:
Tthanks for the heads-up.  What is the full name of this party?  Exactly what "ISDA" did you  leave for them to review (i.e., was this a customized agreement with credit?)?  Can I please have a copy in case someone calls me.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Gelder, John
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:14 PM
To:	'playfair@tri-met.org'
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara; Yoder, Christian; Malowney, John
Subject:	Enron / Tri-Met Legal Follow Up

Brian:

Thank you for meeting with myself and John Malowney today to discuss the opportunities for Enron and Tri-Met to work together.  As we discussed, in order for Enron to provide either physical or financial products as an Oregon Direct Access ESS provider, the EEI and ISDA contracts that we left with you today will need to be executed.

Please feel free to contact the following individuals in our legal department at Enron to discuss the documents in more detail.

ISDA
Sara Shackleton
Enron - Houston
713-853-5620

EEI
Christian Yoder
Enron - Portland
503-464-7845

Thank you and please call with any questions.
John

John Van Gelder
Enron North America - West Desk
503-464-3708


Please see attachments.


Is anyone from Enron involved in the IEEE discussions for uniform standards
for interconnection?


Alex,

Can you set up a meeting to review this product. They have an office in
Houston.

Please, invite people on the distribution list.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------

Denton Mike <Michael.Denton@caminus.com> on 10/24/2000 10:14:04 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: PoweRisk 2000 followup in re WeatherDelta

Mr.  Kaminski,
?
Nick Perry and I  were recently discussing the conference in Paris, and we
gathered that you had  some interest in exploring possible uses of our new
WeatherDelta tool-kit.?  It is the only application that we know of, that
can?model temperature,  loads, and power prices in several locations
simultaneously: thus allowing the  user to measure the value an risk in a
variety of financial instruments,  physical obligations and assets.? I have
attached the product overview  sheet, and would be happy to discuss its
capabilities with you at your  convenience.??
?
Nick and I send our  regards,
?

Vice President
NA Strategic  Consulting
CAMINUS
747 Third  Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 515-3667

?

?

 - weatherdelta.pdf


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Sponsored By:
Energy Exchanges Online - Scottsdale - December 4-6
B2B e-commerce has revolutionized commodity trading, the A&D process and
procurement within the energy industry. With heavyweight keynotes and in-depth
panel discussions this is the first event to bring the major energy companies,
net markets, venture capitalists, regulatory bodies, investment banks and
analysts together to thrash out why its not business as usual but business
online.

For more information please visit www.eyeforenergy.com/xonline

*********************************************************************
===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 6, 2000
Evergreen Solar, Inc. Issues Successful IPO; Do Alternative Fuels Increase
Stock Value?
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Waltham, Mass.-based Evergreen Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq: ESLR) issued an initial
public offering of 3,000,000 shares of its common stock at the IPO price
of $14 per share. Evergreen Solar develops, manufactures and markets solar
power cells, panels and systems throughout the world. The IPO reportedly
will raise $42 million in gross proceeds to support further expansion and
development by Evergreen Solar.

ANALYSIS: Here's yet another case of a relatively unknown company going
public based on grand marketing ideas rather than a solid track record.
Yet, surprisingly, the IPO has opened strong. Last Thursday (11/2), Evergreen
Solar's stock closed 36 percent above its offering price, at $19.00. At
the close of the market on Friday, the stock price had dropped to $17 ?,
but still represented a strong showing while other IPOs last week (both
energy and non-energy) have crashed and burned (Excelergy, for example).

What makes the strong IPO even more startling is Evergreen Solar's
less-than-stellar
financial history. Since its inception in 1994, Evergreen has incurred
significant net losses ($2.5 million in 1998, $2.9 million in 1999 and
$1.9 million for the first six months of 2000). As a result of ongoing
operating losses, Evergreen has a cumulative net loss of $12.3 million
as of June 30, 2000, and has stated clearly that it "expects to incur
substantial
losses for the foreseeable future, and may never become profitable." In
1999, product sales only accounted for 8.2 percent of total revenue, with
the rest coming from research grants. Granted, Evergreen is still in start-up
mode with regard to a large-scale production of its business, but still
it seems very odd to see such a strong IPO from a company that is really
just getting started.

So, what gives? Doesn't it seem logical that a company should demonstrate
financial stability before it goes public? And that if it's not financially
stable, the stock price should go down and not up? I'll provide one theory,
but first let's establish exactly what Evergreen Solar is all about.

The company's sales since 1997 have been composed primarily of solar panels.
Evergreen plans to begin large-scale manufacturing of its solar power products
in a new manufacturing facility in early 2001, a growth strategy that the
IPO proceeds obviously would support. Evergreen's principal objective is
to become a leading producer of high-quality solar power products, primarily
for the on-grid market and the off-grid rural electrification market. What
makes the company unique, according to Evergreen, is its String Ribbon
technology, which reportedly avoids the slicing of solid block of silicon,
which is required for most solar-power technologies. Evergreen's String
Ribbon technology reportedly cuts the use of silicon in half, which reduces
manufacturing costs without impairing product reliability.

In December 1999, Evergreen Solar formed a five-year strategic distribution
and marketing contract with Kawasaki for the Japanese market. Essentially,
Evergreen has agreed to sell its solar power products in Japan exclusively
through Kawasaki. In fact, the partnership constitutes the bulk of Evergreen's
business. In the first six months of 2000, sales to Kawasaki accounted
for approximately 70 percent of Evergreen's product revenues. After the
IPO, Kawasaki will have an 8.4 percent stake in Evergreen.

The risks associated with Evergreen's business are formidable, and the
company admits that its stock price could fall substantially if quarterly
revenue continues to be disappointing. Beyond that, Evergreen's success
hinges on the potential growth of the solar power market, which is still
in question. Evergreen contends that distributed generation technologies
(point-of-use electric generation that either supplements or bypasses the
electric grid) will be one of the most promising areas for growth in the
global electric power market, and within DG technologies solar power has
experienced significant growth over the last 20 years. In addition, solar
power produces zero emissions, and may grow as a result of renewable energy
requirements in various states.

This may be true, but at the same time there are other competing DG
technologies
such as fuel cells, microturbines and wind power, which may slow the grow
of solar power. Plus, there's little proof that Evergreen's String Ribbon
technology will produce significant cost-savings to make it a standout
technology. There are other risks as well, not the least of which is the
exclusive relationship with Kawasaki. If the relationship goes sour, this
could dramatically diminish Evergreen's potential revenues and market share.

So, with this market profile, the question of why Evergreen had such a
strong IPO still remains. I think the answer is that Evergreen's business
focus is exclusively placed on alternative power. At a time when e-commerce
stocks are under growing pressure to demonstrate financial success, stocks
based on new technologies in general and alternative fuels in particular
are being received particularly well by investors. There is arguably a
general perception within the financial community that distributed generation
technologies will gain an increasingly strong lock on the energy market
in the next two years. Commercial and industrial customers want various
options that can reduce their dependence on the grid. With regard to
alternative
fuels and distributed generation technologies, investors may believe that
either utilities or large end-users will begin to develop these technologies
as deregulation continues.

Remember Active Power (Nasdaq: ACPW), whose shares soared on expectations
that flywheel energy storage devices will be a leading technology. On its
opening day in August, Active Power stock increased by 210 percent, from
the opening price of $17 to $51 1/8. Although Active Power's stock price
has bounced around since then, it still closed at $30 on Nov. 3, a very
respectable level and approximately 111 percent above its original price.
Another example is Capstone Turbine (Nasdaq: CPST), which is currently
trading at $45 3/8 after opening at $16 in June.

Along with alternative fuels, venture capitalists also appear to be responding
to technology startups that plan to provide software and related services
to energy companies. Then there is the growing market of exchanges, such
as Pantellos, Enporion, Enermetrix and the like, which could be the next
big round of successful IPOs.

The long-term question is how long such stocks can continue to open so
successfully, without having a strong financial performance to support
the opening. E-commerce stocks started opening strong about a year or two
ago, but began to take a downward decline this spring as investors demanded
to "see the money." Evergreen Solar and similar stocks may be following
a similar path, which makes time a critical factor. The bottom line is
that it is a real race for a company like Evergreen Solar to secure as
much funding as it can and grow its business while the financial climate
remains strong.

===============================================================

Hear JON BROCK, Director of Strategic and Competitive Intelligence,
SCIENTECH/RCI,
address the ramifications of legislative and regulatory requirements on
your Information Technology Infrastructure at the McGraw-Hill/EEI/AGA
Information
Technology Expo in Phoenix Arizona, November 5-7, 2000.

===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Drop the first comma in the first sentence of the third paragraph.  Otherwise
good to go.

	Mark Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate
	Sent by: Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/16/2001 08:42 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara
Hooks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: DEnron Engineering and Operational Services - DRAFT Announcement

Please find attached draft announcement for your review and comment.

I would like to release this on Monday (March 19th).

Thanks

Mark


Please see the attached document from the Associate and Analyst Program.


FYI, If you are available, I would like for you all to attend.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:57 PM
To:	Lokey, Teb; Kowalke, Terry; Corman, Shelley; Donoho, Lindy; Watson, Kimberly; Hanagriff, Richard; Dietz, Rick; Winters, Ricki; Carrillo, Alma; Hass, Glen
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	TW Imbalance Mtg.
Importance:	High

TW Imbalance mtg. has not been canceled.  This is to confirm that there will be a TW Imbalance Mtg. on Monday, September 17th at 3:30p.m-4:30p.m. in conference room EB3907.

Thanks,
Ava


Who are these guys and should someone from our group meet with them?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 02:36 PM
---------------------------

David P Dupre
09/12/2000 11:12 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston MG Visit

Hi,
With the visit approaching by Al Pennisi and Craig Young this Wed.Sep 13
through Fri. Sep.15, please let me know
if you have an interest in visiting with them.  I will be helping to
facilitate their meetings.

If you do have an interest, please let me know which times are most
convenient, in order of preference.

Have a pleasant week,

Thanks
David 3-3528
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 11:10
AM ---------------------------

Craig Young
09/08/2000 01:06 PM
To: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marco Provenzano/Chemetall
S.p.A./Chemetall@CHEMETALL, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P
Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Kelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara
Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Lorna Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Pullicino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Speck/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, TJ Pimpinelli/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
cc: Craig Young/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Houston Visit

Alfred Pennisi and myself will arrive Houston Wed 9/13 and leave Friday. Al
Pennisi is in charge of operations for NY futures/swaps and I head up the
group. Our objective is to meet with each of you or anyone else that can help
us provide/expand internal and external client services for regulated and
nonregulated futures and forwards. We are a U.S. regulated commission house
purchased by Enron Europe through MG London/Enron Trading Services Inc.

Clearing futures exchanges
Combined margin and cash management efficiencies
Broker service across all commodities/financial
Our current client base--- commercial and funds
Meeting desk heads who trade futures
Integrating Enron Net Works/Enron On Line into services and clients
Enron documentation/access for web based non metal
Enron documentation for swaps/OTC non metal
Credit issues --- outside of Metals
Regulation and Govt relations
Fund or Alternative Investment opportunities ---  CTA/CPO
Cross origination opportunities with our clients

Regards
Craig Young
800-932-2343
212-715-2342
917-860-1786
520 Madison Ave
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022


Sally

I would welcome the opportunity to walk you through these presentations if
you have time. It has been 6 weeks - 2 months since we did an integration
update for Rick and hopefully this will demonstrate that we are out of
integration and managing more in the line as if it was any other business -
with it's usual set of problems.

I am also using this report to update Joe Gold who has been moved by the
office of the chair to President of the EnronMetals Group

Hope all is well

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 05/12/2000 07:48
---------------------------

Mike Jordan
05/12/2000 07:42
To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Presentations

Rick

Please find attached two presentations on current position/challenges with
the Metals group and inventory balances in particular.

The former outlines the 'Control' view of integration efforts - past, current
and urgent future
The latter is a summarised response to your earlier concerns over inventory

I look forward to discussing these with you at 9.30am / 15.30 pm ( London ).

Mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 05/12/2000 07:36
---------------------------

Fiona McNaught
04/12/2000 13:21
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Presentations


sorry didnt respond to your message.   don't know how to do that instant
messenger thing anymore.  volume very, very light.  most of stated volume in
spreads and TAS.  No one seems to want to be in the office this week.
Everyone wants to get this year over with.
Keep pumping in the fundamental info.   very good stuff and i'm not getting
it anywhere else.

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           12/26/2000 12:16 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NG Expiry

Hey


fyi, i didnt know if you guys would get this
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jackson, Brandee
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Benbow, Troy; Brady, Kevin; Chang, Bonnie; Dempsey, Wes; Gilmore, Tammy; Haynes, Daniel; Kinsey, Lisa; Lenart, Kirk; Pendergrass, Cora; Schrab, Mark L.; Wesneske, Brian; White, Jessica; Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Erwin, Stephanie ; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Lamadrid, Victor; Loocke, Kelly; Ordway, Chris; Pritchard, Michael; Prudenti, Daniel; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy; Calcagno, Suzanne; Hiatt, Wendy; Jaquet, Tammy; Lakho, Shahnaz; Molinaro, Jeffrey; Pinion, Richard; Webb, Elizabeth; Farmer, Daren J.; Olsen, Michael; Smith, Jay; Baker, Natalie; Fletcher, Brenda H.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Smith, Tanya; Wukasch, Jeanne; Franklin, Mary Theresa; Smith, George F.; Straight, Margie; Trofholz, Lisa; Villarreal, Jesse; Adams, Jacqueline P.; Brewer, Stacey J.; Christiansen, Suzanne; Fernandez, Justin; Groenewold, Shannon; Lisk, Daniel; Mendel, Shelly; O'Connor, John; Schoene, Benjamin; Shim, Elizabeth; Spiegelhauer, Walter; Sullivan, Patti; Wilkes, Corey
Cc:	Superty, Robert
Subject:	FW: Logistics Commercial Realignment

After a careful review of the wholesale and retail gas trading and scheduling process it has been decided that the Gas Logistics teams should report directly into the Enron America's Commercial organization. This realignment will help to strengthen the commercial focus and communication between the trading desks and the schedulers and will play a critical role as Enron tries to maximize opportunities and maintain a competitive trading edge. The details are as follows:

Wholesale

Bob Superty will maintain his management of the Logistics support functions which include the Transport Rate team (Kim Olinger), Electronic Commerce team (Tammy Lee-Jaquet) and Regulatory Affairs teams (Suzanne Calcagno). In addition, Bob will now manage the Northeast Logistics team as part of the East desk. Bob will report directly to Scott Neal and will also help coordinate the Logistics function across all regions working closely with each of the regional Logistics Managers, Commercial desk heads and Enron Americas senior management team.

Victor LaMadrid will manage the Southeast Logistics team and will report directly to Scott Neal. Victor's knowledge and overall east desk experience will be critical to help  maximize east desk opportunities and promote new initiatives across all regions.

Lisa Kinsey will manage the Central Logistics team and will report directly to Hunter Shively.

Patti Sullivan will manage the West Logistics team and will report directly to Mike Grigsby.

Darren Farmer will manage the Texas Logistics team and will report directly to Tom Martin

George Smith will manage the Well Head Logistics team and will report directly to Fred Lagrasta.

Retail

Donna Greif will now report directly to Don Black. Each of the regional Logistics Managers (East - Marde Driscoll-Ernest, Central - Charlie Muzzy, West - Sabra Dinari) will continue to report directly to Donna. Donna will continue her ongoing efforts in the development and integration of the new retail trading systems, prior period adjustments and development of a strong and talented Logistics team.

Congratulations to all involved and welcome to the commercial gas team - John Lavorato, President and CEO, Enron Americas.
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


"Attention Taliban! You are condemned. Did you know that? The instant the terrorists you support took over our planes, you sentenced yourselves to death. The Armed Forces of the United States are here to seek justice for our dead. Highly trained soldiers are coming to shut down once and for all Osama bin Laden's ring of terrorism, and the Taliban that supports them and their actions.
"Our forces are armed with state of the art military equipment. What are you using, obsolete and ineffective weaponry? Our helicopters will rain fire down upon your camps before you detect them on your radar. Our bombs are so accurate we can drop them right through your windows. Our infantry is trained for any climate and terrain on earth. United States soldiers fire with superior marksmanship and are armed with superior weapons.
"You have only one choice ... Surrender now and we will give you a second chance. We will let you live. If you surrender no harm will come to you. When you decide to surrender, approach United States forces with your hands in the air. Sling your weapon across your back muzzle towards the ground. Remove your magazine and expel any rounds. Doing this is your only chance of survival."


In our effort to continue to develop the Marketing Dashboard to meet your
needs and to help you manage your business, we are rolling out our next
release of the Marketing Dashboard.   We have taken your feedback from the
survey as well as added additional functionality that will enhance the
effectiveness.   Below is a list of the new functionality & features:

* Created a new graphical design with multiple pages using 'tabs' to organize
the information better
* Created a tab labeled 'My Pipeline' for you to customize with the
categories of your choice
* Added a specific tab for NNG as well as the ability to add multiple
pipelines in the future
* Additional business and market intelligence categories have been added
through secondary tabs
* Created an Alert bar to allow you to identify specific conditions to notify
you through the Dashboard
* Ability to add security to individual categories on the portal

Here are a few simple steps to take to access the new site:

1) From Internet Explorer 5.0, enter the link below or click on it here to
access:
 http://nahou-wwrms02p.ets.enron.com/

2) You will be required to put in a new I.D. and password - the ID &
passwords are the same as your LAN id:
 * It is the initial of your first name followed by seven digits of your last
name
 (ex. mjanouse for both ID & password)

3) The new Dashboard will appear with defaults in each tab:
 * You can then customize according to your needs and interests.
 * The default will prompt you to the 'My Pipeline' tab;
  - This tab contains categories from the NNG tab but with personalization
features
  - You can remove categories from here if you do not use them in your
day-to-day
 * The NNG tab is the replication of most of the categories from our current
Dashboard:
  -  Some categories have been moved to other tabs.   (ex. Weather )
 * To save this new Dashboard as your 'homepage', please do the following:
  - Go to the top right utility navigation bar which says 'set as your
homepage'
  - Click on it and then when the window comes up for verification, click OK
  - Now, when you log on to your PC, click on the IE5 symbol
  - Please delete current shortcut on your desktop to old Dashboard

Here are a few notes and helpful hints to make your dashboard experience a
joyful one:

Favorites -  Favorites are now called links and are available in the upper
right content of each tab.  You can create as many link categories as you
like and you may now group similar links by entering a custom title when you
edit your list.
Memo -  The Memo pad allows you to jot yourself a note without leaving the
dashboard.  You can create as many memo pads as you like.

If you have any other questions, please call Bobby Mason at x3-5196 or myself
at x3-7275.   Thanks!!


Jeff, what exactly do you want Craig going to be doing?  Please forward a job
scope for Jen and Craig.  Then I will speak with Max if appropriate. I
apologize but we have spoken about a lot of different scopes - it would be
helpful to start from a scope on a piece of paper that we both agree upon.
Just e-mail.  Thanks Jeff.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
11:29 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           07/10/2000 05:08 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

One thing I forgot to mention is that if we do give Mexico mid market to
Craig, we need to set up the organization out of Houston, (I think).  Max has
been interviewing candidates for mid market positions there, and I would like
those guys to report to Craig.  Is Max with us?  Jeff


did I tell you about our trip to Mexico a month ago.... we did some cenote
dives(cave dives).... it was awesome!!!!!


i sent her a gift certificate from amazon.  should be in the mail now and it
is addressed to lori.  gas did come off.  weather looks nice everywhere.  how
was new years?