According to facilities the 4th floor of Three Allen will be available starting April 1st.  I just finished a walk through of the space and have the following comments about possibly moving HPL on to the floor:

It is a mezzanine type floor which has overhangs which are open to the elevator lobby down below.  We'd need to stick trading and logistics into some of the large offices or joining conference rooms to keep them away from the lobby noise.

There are currently only 70 ports or network connections on the floor.  We'd need to pull additional cable to handle the approximately 150 people that would need to be on the floor.  If we decide so to use the floor we could get this done within a couple of weeks at most.

The floor is set up with mostly offices and very few cubes.  We'd need to put together several people in each office to fit everyone into the space.  If we put more than one person in the office the fire code we require us to put a strobe in each office set up this way.

There is no telecom or wiring closet on the floor.  That means to make this work as is HPL would have to remain on our network and depend on us for telecom service via our Nortel switch during the stay in Three Allen since there would be nowhere for AEP to put servers or switches on the floor without any major build out.  There is no set up for the IPC Trader phones and currently no room to add an IPC rack on the 5th floor telecom closet.  We would have to either knock out a wall on the 5th floor closet or tell the traders to live without recorded phone conversations.

The good news is that Keith Dziadek and his team have figured out a way to make the EOL connection with AEP work that will have minimal impact to EOL.  We could use this link for HPL to access their Trade Blotter, Risk Systems and People Soft from AEP.

Bottom Line:
The space on 4 is not ideal but it is available.  I will be receiving a floor plan today and will kindly forward a copy on to someone within your group to work with Bill Donovans group to see if there is anyway to get 150 people on the floor.  There will be some costs to set things up like additional cabling and installing some additional desks or workstations.  If we decide that trader phones are necessary then we would have to expand the 5th floor wiring closet.  If we decide to do this we may need to purchase an IPC switch, system and phones.  It cost me $60,000 when I purchased an IPC system for Bridgeline.  I will also check to see if we have a switch anywhere that we could borrow for a few months.

We need to decide very quickly if this is what we want to do if we are shooting for having people over in Three Allen for the April Bid Week for May production.  We also need to talk about this additional cost with AEP and having them pick some or all of it up.  We also need to have AEP on board because they are building their side of the interfaces with our systems.  If the interfaces are not ready in time then the traders would need to enter trades into both Sitara and AEP's Risk System.  The bigger issue would be the interface with AEP's PeopleSoft system since they would be generating payments via this application.  The good news is that May production for physical trades will not settle until June giving them extra time to finish the interface.  Our side of the interfaces are pretty simple and I feel confident we will be ready to test in April.

Let me know if you need any additional information.  -  Tommy


Sasha:

Thanks very much for adding me to the database.  If I could impose upon you
once again, would you please also arrange access for Tana Jones?  She is
going to assist me with the database project you and I discussed and I think
your database will be a big help.

Thanks again!

Mark


Jessica,

I have not finalized the PGH II/Other capital budgets, but they will conform to the disclosure schedule.
Let me know if you want us to pursue securing NNG approval for the decommissioning variance.

Jim B.

>>> "Uhl, Jessica" <Jessica.Uhl@ENRON.com> 10/23/01 12:26PM >>>

Jim,
Thank you for the update.  The 2002 Capital Slide/Budget for PGE (excluding subsidiaries) is now consistent with the disclosure schedule, except for the decommissioning increase mentioned below.  I believe as the SPA is written, that we still need to obtaina pproval by NWN as the total amount of the capex is increased (eventhough the funds will come from the decommissioning trust).  Kristina, am I reading this correctly?

Additionally, I have not seen a summary for the PGH II capex or Other numbers that are included in the 5.8d isclosure schedule.  Please confirm that the budget is also consistent for these items as well.

Thank you.

Jessica
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Barnes [mailto:Jim_Barnes@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy; Uhl, Jessica; Rod Hayslett
Subject: PGE 2002 Capital Costs and IT Detail

Hello, following up our PGE Budget presentation I am forwarding you the following information.

Jessica - the 2002 Capital Slide has been revised to be consistent with the NNG disclosure schedule.  The decommissioning forecast is up by $1.6 MM, however since this is funded by the decommissioning trust it should not be an issue.

Tracy - Do you have a time and agenda set for the Nov. 1 dry run of the budget presentation?  I may be sitting in for Piro so please keep me posted as to what the plan is.

Rod - you asked for some detail on our IT capital expenditures.  The file IT_Teresa includes the requested detail.  Note that in our UE-115 ratecase we were authorized to expend up to $96.8 MM for the  2000-2002 budget years. This is a balancing account, such that if we don't expend the money we have to refund it to customers.  As an fyi - I've pasted in below the language from our UE-115 Stipulation on IT costs.

Q.  What is the basis for the stipulation relating to issue S-45, CIS / IT Disallowance?

A.  After a Staff review of new IT systems and their associated capital costs, Staff has determined PGE's capital costs for new IT systems to be prudent.  As a result, the Parties agreed to full recovery of PGE's IT investments, subject to a Staff audit.  PGE will place into base rates 100% of the 2002 revenue requirement related to the 2000, 2001, and 2002 capital additions for the CIS/IT capital items listed below.  The 2002 revenue requirement included in base rates will be trued-up to the actual revenue requirement for the CIS/IT capital costs.  OPUC Staff will audit PGE's actual capital expenditures for the CIS/IT capital items listed below.

1. Customer information system.
2. Enterprise resources planning (ERP) system.
3. Network meter reading (NMR) backbone and data store (excluding the meters).
4. Miscellaneous capitalized information technology costs.

Some of the forecasted 2000-2002 capital additions may be delayed until 2003.  Delayed costs can also be recovered, subject to the same Staff audit procedures and standards.  Only those costs that are reasonable and prudent will be authorized for inclusion in the "actual" revenue requirement calculation.  Accordingly, customers will receive a refund for any costs PGE does not expend or costs the OPUC finds imprudent.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Jim B. 503-464-8931

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


MARK EDWARD:

As a fellow Texas legal professional, I would like to apprise you of the
following CLEonline.com seminars taking place in the month of March,
in which you or some of your colleagues or associates may be interested.
All of these seminars are fully accredited for Participatory CLE credits
(not self-study) by the State Bar of Texas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

                  MARCH SEMINARS ON CLEONLINE.COM

1. Anticipating Will Contests and How to Avoid Them [3.0]
2. Avoiding Malpractice Claims: Things to Do (and NOT Do) on the First Day You
  Represent a Client [1.0 ETHICS]
3. Confidentiality and Privileges in Electronic Communications [3.0 ETHICS]
4. Damages in Insurance Litigation [2.0]
5. Deposition Issues and Strategies: Today and Into the 21st Century [3.0]
6. Dissecting Web/E-Commerce Environment and Analyzing the Legal Issues [1.0]
7. Effective Negotiation and Mediation Advocacy [3.0]
8. Ethical Considerations for Multi-Party and Complex Litigation [3.0 ETHICS]
9. Ethical Considerations in Estate Planning for Spouses [1.0 ETHICS]
10. Ethical Issues Arising From Using Experts in Litigation [1.0 ETHICS]
11. How to Collect Child Support in Texas [3.0]
12. IP Litigation Issues: Trade Secrets, Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks
[3.0]
13. Legal Ethics for Corporate and In-house Counsel [3.0 ETHICS]
14. More Selected Ethical Issues Facing Texas Litigators [1.0 ETHICS]
15. New Texas Legislation '99: Real Estate, Lending, and Other Commercial
Matters
  [3.0]
16. Offshore Trusts: Uses for Asset Protection Purposes [3.0]
17. Punitive Damages: Preparing Plaintiff's and Defendant's Case for the
Punitive
  Damage Phase [3.0]
18. School Personnel Law in Texas [3.0]
19. Selected Ethical Issues in Intellectual Property Licensing [1.0 ETHICS]
20. Telecommuting for Lawyers: Tips, Hints and Avoiding Pitfalls [Together
with
  ABA Law Practice Management Section] [2.0]
21. Texas Law of Eminent Domain [3.0]
22. Texas Real Estate Law - Recent Case Update [3.0]
23. Texas Trust Law Update d 1999 Legislative Changes [1.0]
25. The ABC's of Appellate Practice for California Litigators [1.0]
26. The Organizational Client: Attorney-Client Privilege and the No-Contact
Rule
  [3.0 ETHICS]
27. Weblaw: Legal Issues Involved with the Design and Hosting of Websites on
the
  Internet [3.0]
28. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Current Case Law Developments in Texas [3.0]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

For more details on any of these CLEonline.com seminars, please visit:

                      http://www.cleonline.com

    There is NO LIMIT on the number of CLE credits you can earn
    through CLEonline.com seminars under the Texas MCLE rules.
    So you can now satisfy ALL of your annual MCLE requirements
    through our convenient online CLE seminars, without
    sacrificing valuable time away from your practice.

Thanks for your time and consideration.  We would greatly appreciate it
if you could pass this information along to any of your colleagues and
associates who may also be interested in these CLEonline.com seminars. If
you need further information, please reply back or give us a call, and we
will be happy to provide such information to you.

[Please Note:  If you are not interested in receiving CLEonline.com
seminar announcements, we apologize for the interruption, and we will
gladly remove your name from future mailings if you would simply
reply back to this message and ask that you not receive future
announcements.]

Regards,

Michael De La Rosa, Esq.
CLEonline.com
(512) 310-9618
info@cleonline.com
http://www.cleonline.com


Here's the document that I received from the lobbyist today.  It's the same
document that I distributed internally yesterday.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 05:26 PM -----

	"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>
	05/30/2001 12:29 PM
	Please respond to dhunter

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Asm Dem Plan

A little something we got our hands on.....
 - Assembly Demo Plan.doc


Thanks for the copy.

I have already forwarded my comments and proposed changes to you via
messenger this morning.

Subject those forwarded changes its looks fine to me.

David Forster
03/07/2000 11:38 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Emissions website Text

Mark/Harry,

Attached is a copy of the website text.

Please review and approve or suggest changes. We would like to be able to
start uploading this information later today, if possible.

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:36
PM ---------------------------

Mario Parra Cardoso@ENRON
03/07/2000 04:07 PM
To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Emission Auctions: now with Louise's changes


Hey Kirk,
Hunter has a good point.  It would be good to have a daily report of the volumes that we could potentially lose - ie ANR SE Transmission and Gathered volumes plus Trunkline.   Kevin- this could be something that we include on fundys website (a download from Unify maybe?) - both the central and east desks could benefit.
Lisa
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shively, Hunter S.
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:20 PM
To:	Kinsey, Lisa
Subject:	RE: Hurricane Preparedness

excellent.  We need daily reports that represents the volume that we could loose.  The schedulers must know the proper rankings and cut procedures in a hurricane forms.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kinsey, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Cc:	Superty, Robert
Subject:	Hurricane Preparedness

Hunter,
FYI - Next Tuesday we will be getting together with Tom to talk about what we will need to be prepared for in a hurricane.  We are planning to talk about the different interconnects within our region as well as the east desk, plans to replace gas, what legal considers force majeure and rankings.  I have invited the schedulers from the east and upstream desks hoping that this will help facilitate discussion and ideas on how to resolve problems should a hurricane happen.

Kirk Lenart is also in the process of working with Unify team to create reports out of Unify to enable us to track cuts in Unify rather than on a spreadsheet.  This will be more efficient and accurate.  The code freeze on Unify will soon be lifted since the migration to the new server will happen this weekend.

Let me know if you have any other suggestions or questions.

Lisa


Your welcome.

As for myself, I'm doing pretty good these days.  I've been up in Austin
practically every weekend for the games and have actually been managing to go
out a bit more here in Houston during the week in an effort to become social
again.  There isn't too much new in Tejas...the weather's still warm and a
bit on the muggy side, but what can you expect it's only almost November.
Today is Wednesday, so of course Steak Night is on the agenda for this
evening.  Actually, the guy who trained me for my current job is leaving
Enron and his happy hour just happens to be at Little Woodrow's tonight - how
convenient.  On the man front, I've put myself back out on the "market" so to
speak and have a couple of pursuant suitors right now (although, I don't know
that in the end any of them will pass muster).  Unfortunately for them I am
somewhat sceptical of guys in general these days (especially ones that I
can't get background information on through friends), but I'm trying not to
let that color my opinion too much.  Not to worry about your former neighbor
either, I haven't seen or talked to him in a couple of weeks and that's okay
with me.

Drop me a line when you get the chance,
Susan

Darren Maloney@ENRON
10/25/2000 10:55 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 15 minutes of fame

Thanks for the update.  I worked for Jay but wrote the whole thing myself
(50pgs on Grains).
How are you?  What's new in Tejas?  What's up on the man front?(--no not my
old neighbor)
I'll write a bit more soon.  I've been jammed lately and unfortunately it is
not getting any better.
:)  Thanks for the note.  Looking forward to coming back and having a cold
one in TX.  I'll buy
you one!  Silk of the warm ones here.....


Let's talk in the a.m.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/06/2001 12:58 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weyerhaueser

Sara,

Okay, looks to me like Weyerhaueser wants us to act as their counsel.  I told
Bill to propose the language he wanted, but he said his lawyer was out of
town for two weeks.  Which makes me wonder if they can even sign this thing
without her consent, but I did not think to ask him this at the time.

Anyway, he basically wants to add a third party guarantee as eligible credit
support in the event of a downgrade.  He said he is willing to include
language indicating that the nondowngraded party would have to accept this
guarantee, subject to a commercially reasonable objection.  On its face, I
have no objection to such a provision, but would like to quickly bounce it
off of you.  I'm not sure that I want to be forced to disclose what that
reason is....

And basically, I also have no objection to allowing the posting of collateral
in a form and amount acceptable to the nondowngraded party, with such amount
subject to change as conditions warrant.

Also, I thought we usually had assignability to affiliates so long as the
guarantor remained the same.  I think Bill indicated we probably removed that
because we had it this way with the Canadian subsidiary.  He wants to put it
back in.  I want it back in as well.

Otherwise, we are increasing the guaranty amounts to $25MM, and they have
agreed to the cross default provisions.

Let's discuss this when you get a minute.  He had some additional
clarification he needed, but these seemed to be the legal issues on his
list.  I don't think there is going to be any way around this other than to
call him and explain.  Sorry.

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Bowman, Bill" <bill.bowman@weyerhaeuser.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bowman+2C+20Bill+22+20+3Cbill+2Ebowman+40weyerhaeuser+2E
com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Radous, Paul
Subject: Provisions

1 - We would like the right to assign to another counterparty as well as
Enron.  Something within Weyerhaeuser.

2 - If Weyerhaeuser or Enron below investment grade, can

 Post collateral, Counterparty will act in a commercially reasonable
manner

 Obtain a third party guarantee, Counterparty will act in a
commercially reasonable manner

Regards,

Bill Bowman
Phone - 253-924-3418
Fax - 253-924-3870
e-mail bill.bowman@weyerhaeuser.com

All contents in this e-mail should be considered proprietary and treated in
a confidential manner


I have been asked to make a brief presentation at next Monday,s Executive
Committee meeting addressing a new S.E.C. insider trading rule.  Although the
new rule may increase exposure to liability for insider trading, certain
provisions of the new rule may actually provide for greater flexibility in
the timing of your personal trades in Enron Corp. common stock.  Attached is
a short memo addressing our current Company procedures and policies for
trading, the new S.E.C. rule, and some suggestions for alternatives that you
may want to consider concerning your personal trades in Enron Corp. common
stock.  If anyone wants to discuss the new rule and the trading alternatives
provided by the new rule before next week,s meeting, please don,t hesitate to
give me a call at 713-853-3069.  Thank you.

Attachments


Attached are assignment and assumption agreements for CA I and CA II.

The only changes to the GE form were those changes suggested by Lisa, and a
little clean up.

Kay


We need your assistance!!!

You, on a weekly basis, submit bullet items to Steve for posting on ETS' Intranet Update page.  Steve edits and reviews the bullets   prior to publication.

We would like for you to take time each week to review the final version of the week's bullets.  Compare and take note of the changes Steve incorporates, i.e., adding phrases such as - MMBtu, operational fuel, etc.   Steve should spend less time editing and more time reviewing your accomplishments, don't you agree?

Please call if you have questions and thanks in advance for your cooperation,

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


1-800-998-2462  (conf# 5608264)


You are correct it is being changed m-s on peak


Martin,

Sara asked that I furnish you with a copy of our "newly revised" Schedule to
the ISDA Master Agreement.  This document includes under Part 5 the new reps
as a result of the changes to the Act.

For your convenience, if you have access to Houston's "o" drive you can
access any of our swap forms by following path set forth below:

  O:\Legal\ATTY.FMS\SWAPFORMS

Hope this helps.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 08:53 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	03/28/2001 08:34 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commodity Futures Modernization Act ("the Act")

Susan:   Put this on your list (it is not urgent).  Please send to Martin
Rosell or advise him of the location of ENA's revised ISDA Schedule.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 08:33 AM -----

	Martin Rosell
	03/28/2001 01:27 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commodity Futures Modernization Act ("the Act")

Sara, tks for your swift response.  I'll follow up with Mark E. on the memos,
but would very much like to see the new "eligible contract participant" and
line of business reps (or perhaps just a copy of ENA's revised ISDA
Schedule).  Tks

FYI, I won't come to San Antonio; hope instead to see you at the autumn
conference.

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 28/03/2001 09:23
---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton on 27/03/2001 11:29 CDT
To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Commodity Futures Modernization Act ("the Act")

Martin:  further to my earlier email, the U.S. changes (relating to the Act)
were previously sent to the attention of Mark Evans for the appropriate
distribution.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 10:27 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	03/27/2001 09:05 AM

		 To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Martin:

How are things going?

In response to your question, there is no internal memo but we do have copies
of external lawfirm memoranda.  Yes, ENA has changed its ISDA Schedule form
to provide for the "eligible contract participant" rep and line of business.
I'll verify with Susan Bailey as to whether these changes have been subnitted
to ECTRIC.

Rather than bombard you with lots of paper, please let me know what you would
lilke to see regarding the new legislation.  Please note that the act is very
broad, extremely confusing (even to CFTC "know-it alls") and addresses many
types of derivatives (ag, equity, etc.) with some specificity.

Will you be in San Antonio?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Martin Rosell
	03/27/2001 08:57 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Hi Sara

Can you shed any light on the issues below?

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 27/03/2001 16:56
---------------------------

Martin Rosell
18/03/2001 16:58
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Elisabeth:

I read an article in a law magazine about the captioned Act and it was, among
other things, stated therein that CFTC under the Act had been deprived of its
jurisdiction over swaps (other than those related to agricultural products)
made by eligible contracts participants.  Since the Oslo office trades
through ECTRIC, I wonder whether this new piece of legislation has an impact
on our standard reps relating to the "trade options exemption" and as to the
parties being "eligible swap participants" (are they still required)?  Is
there any internal memo yet prepared on the Act and its implications?

Martin


Sounds like a good plan.  I can't wait to hear how it went in Danbury.
Sounds like the CRRA meeting went well.

Kay

	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           10/25/2000 06:00 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FCE contract

I expect that a number of business issues will be discussed tomorrow.
Whether its tomorrow or Friday, I think to maintain schedule that we will
need to get the draft P.O. (with the legal revisions) to FCE by Friday.  At
this point, I am mainly concerned about the business points and the status of
the technical information.  If we are going to be substantially done by a
week from Friday, we need to move that portion along faster.  If we get
feedback on the business points by early tomorrow, I would like to get those
comments into the draft P.O.  If not, then I want to send the P.O. (with the
changes we have) to FCE so they can review it on the weekend.


Alright guys, here is the final version, try it in your P&L today.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
10:23 AM ---------------------------

	Gregory A Mausser
	02/26/2001 09:32 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL PHYSICAL TEMPLATE FOR FEBRUARY 2001

Phillip,  Not sure why you did not receive last Thursday.  Can your group
bring the template into the P&L by end of day?

GM
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregory A Mausser/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
09:29 AM ---------------------------

	Gregory A Mausser
	02/22/2001 10:54 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Hungerford/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: FINAL PHYSICAL TEMPLATE FOR FEBRUARY 2001

Here is the final version of the template to be used in February 2001
+Regions, P&L.  Please re-link cells pulling information from other tabs
within your file (i.e. Third Party Sales, Third Party Purchases, CPR Fuels,
CPR Imbalance, CPR Cash Out, CPR Pipeline Exchange, and CPR Storage).

Keep in mind that if you have multiple physical tabs in your P&L each must be
replaced with the template.  Also, if your region has multiple physical tabs
under a single P&L, they should be rolled into one total physical tab named
"physical".

In future months, I will send each of you a revised template inclusive of all
CPR desk names and CPR couterparty names by the end of each month.  Please
copy future templates to your file to ensure consistency across all regions.

Thank you all for your patience and cooperation while we implement this
process improvement.  Please let me know how I can help.

Regards,
Greg (37299)


Kate,
Bobette from Powerdex will want to speak to you regarding timelines, templates, etc. to set up an hourly index to be published the next day. I gave her your name because of your past experience in deal control. She will likely be calling around 9:30 or 9:45. I am not sure where I am at on this index, your feedback will play a large role in whether we participate in this index. Sorry for the short notice.

Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Bobette Riner [mailto:briner@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:27 PM
To: Williams III, Bill
Cc: powerdex@houston.rr.com
Subject: Bill, it's Bobette, with the hourly index template

It's attached, and I appreciate your feedback (particularly re: a doable filing time for your shop). Included is COB, even though I'm not sure there's enough liquidity to support it. Time will tell. Thanks for the comments on Mid-C; I'll carry on with that as a point, although I'll probably have to define it (perhaps list the buses?) to calm players' concerns.

This template is for participants, whom will be kept confidential at all times. I will use purchases and sales, but won't reveal which is which or the identity or positions of any participants. For this index to have any value, accurate numbers must be provided. I assure you, I will respect confidentiality--those who don't, don't deserve to stay in business.

I will send you confidentiality agreements and the index methodology for your records, if you like, but first, there will be a beta-testing period during which the methodology may be tweaked. (For example, players may decide they would like to see bal-day deals included within the indexes. We did not include them in the indexes I developed for the Eastern Interconnect, however.)

Powerdex has been set up for the purpose of doing these hourly indexes, and integrity is key here. It is my intention for it to be a useful, accurate, comprehensive and independent service. Please let me know what you require from me. It's always a pleasure talking with you.

Thanks,

Bobette Riner
President, Powerdex, Inc.
8206 Burning Hills Dr.
Houston, TX 77071

713/484-7937
cell: 832/428-7008

briner@houston.rr.com <mailto:briner@houston.rr.com>
powerdex@houston.rr.com <mailto:powerdex@houston.rr.com>


Hi Kate,

Can you please let Phil know that he should be testing deals in the enpower
test database not the actual system.

Thanks

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/09/2001 12:20 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 541638

This was just a practice deal entered by Phil yesterday to test our new
version of deal entry. He zeroed out the volume, but neglected to kill the
deal or at least change it to no confirm. So this is NOT a good deal - I'm
killing it now.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/09/2001 09:46 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 541638

Kate can you ask Phil Platter is Dane Energy Corp the correct broker on this
deal?

Thanks


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 05:35 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/02/2001 04:54 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-02-01

Please see attached.


Attached are two letter our commercial lead on the salt soaked unti wants to
send.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:14
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           11/08/2000 12:40 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: My Changes to Westinghouse Letters

Kay:

Please review the attached, in particular letter 1 which deals with setting
the record straight on events to date. Thanks.

Ben


Attached are the certificates and resolutions for your review.

Best regards,
Gina Karathanos
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron Global Finance Legal
713-853-3376 phone
713-853-9252 fax

-----Original Message-----
From: Bahlmann, Gareth
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Fossum, Drew; Brown, William E.; Karathanos, Gina
Cc: Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James; St. Clair, Carol
Subject: Re: FW: Form of Revolving Credit Agreement and Guaranty

Gina Karathanos has prepared the certs and resolutions. They are know being reviewed by VE. Drew, the docs must be scrubbed vs the bylaws etc to confirm the form. VE is drafting the opinions now.
Gareth Bahlmann


Please give Judy Townsend, Scott Goodell, and myself  the ability to trade
the physical Canadian products.  We need to be able to see them on EOL.

Thanks


East Bankruptcy Post Id for 12/21- #15395


Enerfax Daily
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE POWER AND GAS INFORMATION SOURCE
   Thursday, January 31 2002 No. 924
Visit: http://www.enerfax.com  to view our web version or for Oil Prices & News http://www.enerfaxgold.com

PHYSICAL NATURAL GAS PRICES
Gulf/Eastern Region
| Agua Dulce              | 1.97  |
| ANR SE                  | 2.06  |
| Carthage TG             | 2.05  |
| Chicago Citygate        | 2.12  |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore   | 2.06  |
| Dominion South Point    | 2.20  |
| Henry Hub               | 2.07  |
| Houston Ship Channel    | 2.12  |
| Katy Hub                | 2.06  |
| NGPL LA Pool            | 2.03  |
| NGPL - Midcontinent     | 2.01  |
| NGPL STX                | 2.00  |
| NGPL TX/OK              | 2.03  |
| NNG Demarc.             | 2.09  |
| Niagara                 | 2.30  |
| Sonat Tier 1            | 2.05  |
| TCO IPP Pool            | 2.15  |
| Tetco ELa               | 2.05  |
| Tetco M-3               | 2.38  |
| Tetco STX               | 1.98  |
| TGP Zone 0              | 2.01  |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg)    | 2.05  |
| TGT Zone SL             | 2.06  |
| New York Citygate       | 2.39  |
| Transco Station 65      | 2.13  |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY)     | 2.40  |
| Trunk ELa               | 2.07  |
| Western Region
| California Border       | 2.17  |
| El Paso Keystone        | 2.05  |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco | 2.05  |
| Waha Hub                | 2.05  |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig)      | 2.93  |
| Dawn Hub/Union          | 2.24  |
| Northwest Stanfield     | 2.06  |
| Wyoming Pool            | 1.95  |
| Opal                    | 1.97  |
| PGT-Malin               | 2.13  |
| Sumas                   | 2.06  |
Flow Date 1/31
-------------------------------------------------------------
NATURAL GAS FUTURES
Henry Hub
12 Month Strip  2.5059
18 Month Strip  2.6197
| Month | High  |  Low  | Close | Change |
| MAR   | 2.115 | 2.030 | 2.080 | +0.013 |
| APR   | 2.180 | 2.100 | 2.147 | -0.003 |
| MAY   | 2.260 | 2.200 | 2.230 | -0.010 |
| JUN   | 2.340 | 2.290 | 2.310 | -0.010 |
| JUL   | 2.420 | 2.350 | 2.380 | -0.013 |
| AUG   | 2.465 | 2.410 | 2.440 | -0.013 |
| SEP   | 2.470 | 2.435 | 2.440 | -0.018 |
| OCT   | 2.490 | 2.450 | 2.466 | -0.022 |
| NOV   | 2.725 | 2.694 | 2.694 | -0.024 |
| DEC   | 2.940 | 2.900 | 2.909 | -0.024 |
| JAN   | 3.030 | 3.000 | 3.007 | -0.024 |
| FEB   | 3.010 | 2.965 | 2.965 | -0.026 |
-------------------------------------------------------------

-
RISK MANAGEMENT
Across the Energy Enterprise

e-Acumen, Inc., is uniquely positioned to help you manage risk and increase value. That's because our analytics, data and applications cover all strategic aspects of the energy enterprise, from short-term forecasting to comprehensive risk analysis and portfolio optimization, to asset valuation and weather risk management. Dedicated to the needs
of energy and trading companies in a dynamic and competitive world, our approach combines best-in-class physical fundamentals with industry-leading statistical methodologies.
e-Acumen is a venture-backed company founded in January, 1997. Since then we have listened attentively to the market and assembled a stellar cast of seasoned energy industry professionals and Silicon Valley technologists. Join us as we help the industry continue its path toward liquidity and profitable, risk-managed growth in the exciting years ahead!
Click here  to find out more about current special offers, or go to http://www.e-acumen.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Futures Up Slightly after AGA Report

Natural gas futures for March delivery on the NYMEX gained $0.013 yesterday to $2.08 per MMBtu. The April contract lost $0.003 to $2.147 per MMBtu. February expired Tuesday at $2.006 per MMBtu, the lowest expiration since October's $1.83 finish. The market opened higher, dropped off quickly and spent most of the day slowly recovering as prices hovered above $2 per MMBtu, chopping inside a $2.03  $2.11 range after the AGA released the storage report. Only 111 Bcf were withdrawn from storage last week, keeping the year-on-year surplus at about a Tcf. There is now 2.294 Tcf in storage. Look for an extended time of bottom-building, reflecting very poor fundamentals but not much room on the downside to operate. Quick short-covering rallies may appear, but everyone knows they really cant go anywhere and stay. The implied volatility for options is deteriorating. Fewer strike prices that will be coming into jeopardy mean a quiet, narrow and sideways market with a downward bias a! head. The market likely is headed into a boring non-eventful period. Longer term, supply-demand is tightening up. With the recession ending this summer along with expected smaller injections, the market has a huge $0.92 forward carry between the March contract and January 2003. Estimated volume was 78,500 contracts, with 30,000 of those hedges or spreads. Natural gas for next day delivery across the US and Canada was generally up $0.05  $0.15 yesterday as cash kept pace with the NYMEX, propped up by short-term cold in the Midwest and West, as well as end-of-month balancing and cash-outs. Natural gas for next day delivery at the Henry hub gained $0.10 to $2.07 per MMBtu.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Exploit the enterprise-wide transaction management power deployed by the
big names in gas.
NUCLEUS Software
ZAINET Gasmaster
The most comprehensive, totally-integrated natural gas information system
available today.
Ask about out limited-time offer competitive upgrade program.
CAMINUS
Your Competitive Edge in Energy.
Call Caminus at (212)515-3700 or visit the website at http://www.caminus.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Power Bulletins
* Fording 4th Quarter Profit Jumps 100% on Higher Coal Prices
* Legal Experts Disagree on GAO-Cheney Dispute
* Enron Wind Too Risky for German Turbine Maker Nordex
* Williams Remains Committed to Retaining Current Investment-Grade Rating; Market Reaction to Earnings Pre-Release Called Overblown
* FirstEnergy Reports Higher 4th Quarter and Record Year-End Earnings
* FTC Grants NorthWestern Anti-Trust Clearance for Pending Acquisition of Montana Power's Utility Business
* UtiliCorp United Completes Offering of 12,500,000 Shares of Common Stock at $23
* Western and Northeast Spot Electricity Prices Gain on Colder Weather
* ECAR Power Prices Slip as Ample Generation Offsets Weather
* Southeast Spot Power Prices Rise
-------------------------------------------------------------
DO YOU JUST SEE TREES? WE SEE A FOREST!
See the forest with NewEnergy MarketPower by efficiently obtaining information for critical market-based investment decisions and mitigate your risk.
Use MarketPower to determine the effects of transmission congestion, fuel costs, generator availability and load growth on market prices to better execute your company's strategic direction.
Designed specifically for today's energy industry, MarketPower is accurate and easy-to-use, so you can plan for tomorrow...today!
New Ideas...New Solutions...NewEnergy.
For a free 30-day trial visit us at http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com/justdownloadit  or call us at 770 779 2957 for more information
-------------------------------------------------------------

AGA Natural Gas Storage Report

Week                                    Prev
Ending    Prev                   Prev    Year
| Region | 1/25/02 | Week | Diff | % Full | Year | % Full|
| Prod   |  684    |  707 | -23  |  72%   |  296 |  31%  |
| East   | 1250    | 1319 | -69  |  68%   |  723 |  39%  |
| West   |  360    |  379 | -19  |  71%   |  222 |  44%  |
| Total  | 2294    | 2405 |-111  |  70%   | 1241 |  38%  |
-------------------------------------------------------------

Mirant to Restructure in European Operations

Mirant is restructuring its European operations in an effort to improve liquidity. It expects $50 million per year in annual savings from the move. Mirant may sell all or some of its marketing and risk management operations in Europe as part of the restructuring. Mirant says 100 of its 150 European employees work in the marketing unit. It has $750 million in available cash and credit, enough liquidity to do business, even though its credit rating was cut to junk status last month. The capital constraints do not make it possible for Mirant to create the portfolio of assets required to justify a presence in risk management. Mirant will close its Berlin office as part of the restructuring. The company reaffirmed it commitment to power-plant projects in Italy and Norway and a UK power plant in which it has stakes. Shares of Mirant have fallen 61% in the past year.
-------------------------------------------------------------
FAST. FLEXIBLE. PROVEN.
The AURORA(TM) electric market model helps you deal with the challenges and risks of today's energy marketplace.
Exceptionally fast and easy to learn, AURORA(TM) reflects fundamental market drivers and gives power marketers, resource developers and portfolio managers a better way to manage against market uncertainty and price volatility.
AURORA delivers -
?	Price forecasts - hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly
?	On-peak, off-peak pricing
?	Resource valuation and net power costs
?	Portfolio analyses
?	Capacity expansion analyses
?	Effects of emissions
?	And much more . . .
AURORA's comprehensive databases cover all electricity markets throughout the U.S. and Canada. The model also handles storage, congestion pricing, and offers detailed reporting and data export capabilities. It can be used as a stand-alone tool or be integrated with your other business tools.
Visit us at http://ww.epis.com  or call (503) 722-2023.
EPIS, Inc.
Market Information Solutions for the Electric Power Marketplace
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas NYMEX Volume
02FEB   63,582
02MAR   30,950
02APR    9,404
02MAY    4,773
02JUN    1,994
02JLY    1,640
02AUG    3,868
02SEP    1,650
02OCT    3,223
02NOV    3,944
02DEC      826
03JAN    1,436
03FEB      261
03MAR      682
03APR      127
03MAY      315
03JUN      366
03JLY      313
03AUG      226
03SEP       36
03OCT       29
03NOV      308
03DEC      629
04JAN      470
-------------------------------------------------------------
        GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI
In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage risk in real time.
That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when it may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your enterprise.
With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk and mark-to-market all in real time.
Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -Americas: +1-281-681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia Pacific: +61(0) 2-9976-6111http://www.kwi.com
--------------------------------------------------------------

Investors Wary of Earnings Restatements

The collapse of Enron and worries about Tyco Internationals accounting for its numerous acquisitions have made investors wary. During the 1990s, Wall Street would overlook complex or difficult to understand financial statements, but no longer. Restating earnings can lead a stock sell-off. Anadarkos shares dipped over 7% yesterday after it restated 3rd quarter earnings to include $1.7 billion in charges to reflect lower values for its oil and natural gas assets. Its shares eventually recovered and closed the day down about 1%. Investors are also scrutinizing companies with high debt levels because they are too dependent on borrowing to support growth. Cendant, which owns Avis, has a number off-balance-sheet entities and over $6 billion in debt. It also has been subject to an investigation of its accounting practices in the past. Cendant has seen its shares fall by over 18% in less than a month. And Tyco shares fell about 18% to $27.50 in the morning, before rallying to tr! ade up 4.5% at $35.15 at sessions close.
-------------------------------------------------------------

ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.

*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks
FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.http://www.fea.com/?cId=17
main phone number:  1 510-548-6200
email address: info@fea.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL POWER PRICES
|            | High  |  Low  | Average |
|            | $/MWh | $/MWh |  $/MWh  |
| Cinergy    | 19.00 | 17.05 |  18.20  |
| ECAR       | 20.25 | 16.25 |  18.70  |
| ERCOT      | 19.85 | 18.50 |  19.40  |
| Entergy    | 17.50 | 16.50 |  16.65  |
| TVA        | 21.70 | 19.90 |  20.80  |
| ComEd      | 19.25 | 18.75 |  19.05  |
| Nepool     | 30.25 | 30.00 |  30.05  |
| PJM West   | 22.00 | 21.25 |  21.40  |
| Main       | 19.50 | 18.00 |  18.90  |
| MAPP       | 21.00 | 19.55 |  20.00  |
| Palo Verde | 27.50 | 23.00 |  25.00  |
| Mid C      | 20.20 | 18.80 |  19.55  |
| COB        | 22.95 | 21.95 |  22.35  |
| 4 Corners  | 26.00 | 23.75 |  24.90  |
| Mead       | 26.00 | 25.00 |  25.70  |
| NP 15      | 25.10 | 23.70 |  24.35  |
| SP 15      | 25.50 | 23.75 |  24.65  |
Power Delivered 1/31
-------------------------------------------------------------

FERCs Brownell Wants Enron Investigated on California Power

FERC commissioner Nora Brownell says that the commission should investigate whether Enron manipulated wholesale electricity prices in California. Enron has been accused by Western states politicians of raising prices in long-term supply contracts following California's power crisis. Brownell made her comments after Chairman Pat Wood testified before the Senate Energy Committee about Enron's impact on the nations energy markets. The electricity crisis was linked to California's failed deregulation scheme that did not encourage new plant construction and barred the state's utilities from passing through higher wholesale prices to consumers. Still pending before a FERC administrative law judge is California's demand for $9 billion in alleged overcharges by wholesale suppliers, including Enron. That case is likely to be determined this spring. However, Brownell was very noncommittal on what action FERC should take if any market manipulation was found to have occurred. So far! , there is no price data to show Enron did anything wrong, she said. The FERC has not officially opened an investigation yet but is expecting a formal request from Democratic Senators Dianne Feinstein of California and Maria Cantwell of Washington.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Allegheny Energy Supply Company, Salt River Project (SRP) and Sempra Energy
Resources announce Open Season for proposed Desert Crossing Gas Storage and
Transportation System. Open Season for customers interested in capacity
begins Jan. 10, 2002 and extends through Feb. 8, 2002.  For information,
visit http://www.desert-crossing.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

Todays Gas Bulletins
* GAO to Sue Vice President Cheney Over Refusal to Turn Over Information Related to Work of Energy Task Force
* Several New Enron Hearings Added to Next Week's Congressional Calendar; Two Hearings Scheduled for Monday and Former CEO Lay Expected to Make Appearance at Both
* Steve Cooper, Charged with Raising Enron from the Ruins, Plans to Avoid Liquidation by Rebuilding Company in Old Image as Regulated Natural Gas Pipeline Operator
* Existing Cozy Self-Regulatory System that Coddles Accountants Headed for Shredder as Lawmakers React to Enron Collapse and Wave of Wall Street Accounting Fears
* Kerr-McGee Files $2 Billion Mixed Shelf of Debt Securities, Common and Preferred Stock, Warrants, Guarantees and Stock Purchase Contracts and Units
* Howell Sets 10% Stock Dividend, 2001 Production Up 10%
* FERC Approves El Paso Request to Expand Pipeline to Export Natural Gas to Mexico
------------------------------------------------------------

Williams Seeks to Avoid Credit Downgrade

Executives from Williams will meet with credit rating agencies today in a bid to retain an investment grade debt rating. Shares of Williams have fallen  25% since it postponed its 4th quarter report on Tuesday. The delay was caused by a review of up to $2.4 billion in costs from Williams Communication Group, which was spun off in April. In its preliminary 2001 report, Williams per share profit rose to $2.35 from $2.33 in 2000. Williams expects to earn $2.65 to $2.75 per share in 2002. With the downfall of Enron, energy traders have been subjected to increased scrutiny by credit rating agencies. Calpine, Dynegy, and Mirant all saw their debt downgraded last month. Williams says it expects its credit rating to be upheld and that it has properly accounted for the communication group spin-off. If Williams debt falls below investment grade, almost $1.4 billion in debt of Williams Communications Group could be accelerated. It could also owe $750 million for fiber optic network! leases and $250 million for other expenses related to the communications unit. A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Williams and Williams Communications, claiming the companies mislead investors on the spin-off. Moody's rates Williams long-term credit as Baa2 and S?rates it BBB+.
------------------------------------------------------------

 Ziff Energy Group presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
Power Drives Storage
Will the recession affect plant and storage development?
Will record high volumes in storage further depress gas prices?
Is it possible to mitigate storage risk while dealing with year-round price
volatility?
Plus
Two Important Workshops
Calpine Corporation
Hear what the Power Generator wants from the storage industry
Bruce Bernard
Learn from the expert how to mitigate storage price risk in the 2002 gas
marketplace
February 6 & 7
Houston
Four Season Hotel
1300 Lamar Street
Register Today for this Important Conference
Call 1-800-853-6252
Email: gasconference@ziffenergy.com
Visit: http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anadarko Admits Accounting Mistake

Anadarko Petroleum has admitted that it also has an accounting problem. Its accountants evidently used the wrong figures to calculate the worth of some of the its properties. Anadarko will have to restate its 3rd quarter results by writing off more than $1 billion after tax. Its stock, however, fell less than 2% yesterday, the day after the accounting error was disclosed. After Enron, any amount of trouble with a company's books can send its stock tumbling. Shares of Tyco International lost nearly 20% yesterday after irregularities and accounting problems arose. PNC Financial Services Group and Williams have also been hard hit by concerns about their accounting this week. So Anadarkos stock may yet pay the price. Anadarko claims to be embarrassed by the mistake, but there has been no good explanation of why it happened. The problem centers on properties acquired when it bought UPR in July 2000. Because prices have recently dropped, the company had to write-down the valu! e of properties on its books. But in determining the write-down of the UPR properties, it somehow used the wrong tax basis.
-------------------------------------------------------------
R. W. Beck is an engineering and management consulting firm serving utilities, developers, financiers and governments worldwide.  Founded in 1942, we help our clients face energy market challenges by providing:
Portfolio Analysis to improve diversification and risk-adjusted performance of energy assets.
Risk Control to help reduce the probability of losses.
Asset Valuation to understand the market value and risk characteristics of physical and financial energy assets.
Training to improve your ability to identify and manage tactical and strategic risks.

Please visit our web site at http://www.rwbeck.com

-------------------------------------------------------------
POWER FUTURES
| Month |   COB   | Change |   PV    | Change |
| MAR   |  19.00  | +0.00  |  21.00  | +0.00  |
| APR   |  19.75  | +0.00  |  22.75  | +0.00  |
| MAY   |  19.00  | +0.00  |  23.50  | +0.00  |
| JUN   |  21.00  | +0.00  |  27.25  | +0.00  |
| JUL   |  28.50  | +0.00  |  37.50  | +0.00  |
| AUG   |  38.50  | +0.00  |  42.75  | +0.00  |
| SEP   |  32.00  | +0.00  |  32.50  | +0.00  |
| OCT   |  29.00  | +0.00  |  27.75  | +0.00  |
| NOV   |  28.25  | +0.00  |  26.75  | +0.00  |
| DEC   |  28.25  | +0.00  |  27.25  | +0.00  |
| JAN   |  30.00  | +0.00  |  28.50  | +0.00  |
| FEB   |  30.00  | +0.00  |  28.00  | +0.00  |
| Month | Entergy | Change | Cinergy | Change |
| MAR   |  19.50  | +0.00  |  21.00  | +0.00  |
| APR   |  20.00  | +0.00  |  21.50  | +0.00  |
| MAY   |  23.25  | +0.00  |  24.75  | +0.00  |
| JUN   |  27.50  | +0.00  |  30.00  | +0.00  |
| JUL   |  34.75  | +0.00  |  38.15  | +0.00  |
| AUG   |  34.75  | +0.00  |  38.15  | +0.00  |
| SEP   |  21.80  | +0.00  |  23.00  | +0.00  |
| OCT   |  22.25  | +0.00  |  22.60  | +0.00  |
| NOV   |  22.25  | +0.00  |  22.60  | +0.00  |
| DEC   |  22.25  | +0.00  |  22.60  | +0.00  |
| JAN   |  24.25  | +0.00  |  26.00  | +0.00  |
| FEB   |  24.25  | +0.00  |  26.00  | +0.00  |
------------------------------------------------------------
Power Futures
| Month |  PJM  | Change |
| MAR   | 24.25 | +0.00  |
| APR   | 24.75 | +0.00  |
| MAY   | 28.40 | +0.00  |
| JUN   | 35.00 | +0.00  |
| JUL   | 46.00 | +0.00  |
| AUG   | 46.00 | +0.00  |
| SEP   | 26.80 | +0.00  |
| OCT   | 25.75 | +0.00  |
| NOV   | 25.75 | +0.00  |
| DEC   | 25.75 | +0.00  |
| JAN   | 30.10 | +0.00  |
| FEB   | 30.10 | +0.00  |
-------------------------------------------------------------

Democrats Claim Deregulation Bill Has Loopholes

Deregulation of the nation's $200 billion power industry may have hit a snag after a couple Democratic senators claimed it could contain regulatory loopholes. The Democrats say that the provision would allow any affiliate of a utility holding company that held investment securities of companies with an indirect interest in the electric or natural gas utility business to avoid registering with the SEC. In a letter to the SEC the senators argued that such an unregistered company would not be subject to the same regulations as other investment companies. They allege that it creates potentially dangerous loopholes in the system of investor protection that has enabled the mutual fund industry to grow successfully over the last 60 years. A House energy subcommittee is expected to hold a bill writing session next month to formulate a federal power deregulation plan. The SEC was also asked to rethink its support for repeal of the 1930s Public Utility Holding Act. The act was cre! ated to protect consumers from some utilities which issued stocks and bonds based on shaky assets, evaded state regulations, and quickly expanded their holdings through questionable financial deals. House Republicans contend the law is outdated and inhibits the creation of bigger, more efficient power markets. Before Enrons collapse, some Democrats also supported repealing the law. The power industry also has lobbied for years for the law to be struck down. The Senators claim that Enron followed in the footsteps of utility holding companies in the Depression years by creating a highly complex corporate structure for the apparent purpose of obscuring significant information from investors and engaging in self-dealing transactions with affiliated entities. In 1995, a SEC report contended that the public utilities holding act could be eliminated because utilities must disclose other detailed financial information to the agency.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Energy Seminars, Inc. Announces Key Seminar Offerings for January:
Energy Seminars will be going to Florida and Calgary in 2002!

Click to http://www.energyseminars.com  to see our 2002 schedule.
Register on-line at http://www.energyseminars.com  or call Registrar Gina Patrick
Phone: 281-362-7979
FAX: 281-296-9922
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Progas Storage and Services, Inc.
Progas can custom build gas storage in the Upper Midwest.

? Design to your specifications
? Close to your markets
? Unregulated storage
? Lower transportation fees
? Lower storage rates
Progas is now accepting proposals and orders for years 2002-2007 for approxamately 5 bcf of storage on Midwestern system serving Indiana, Illinois, and 3 bcf on Texas Gas Transmission system serving Tennessee, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio.  Additional potential storage filds beding acquired at this time on Midwestern, anhandle Eastern and A & R (Coastal) systems serving the Upper Midwest. Inquiries from potential partners, investment bankers, and brokers welcome.

Progas Storage and Services, Inc.
8610 South Highway 277
Abilene, TX 79606
Phone: 915-698-3699
Fax: 915-698-2859
Email: gastorage@aol.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 lost 18.31 points to 7548.83
The CRB Index fell 0.38 points to 186.93
The US Dollar increased 0.24 points to 119.62
The Dow advanced 144.99 points to 9618.24
The S?500 rose 12.93 points to 1113.57
The Nasdaq was up 20.45 points to 1913.44
March NYMEX Crude Oil dropped 0.50 to 19.08
Canadian-US Exchange climbed 0.0008 to 1.5912
-------------------------------------------------------------

ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals

NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and  ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE :http://www.energyinstitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Text, Lotus, AOL, Yahoo, Excite, Readers-subscribe by writing to:enerfax-subscribe@egroups.com
Outlook Email Readers-subscribe to webmail by writing to:
mailto:join-EnerfaxDaily@relay.netatlantic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To view past issues of Enerfax Daily -Sign up for free at  Divines Sagewave at
http://www.sagewave.com/D2/autolog/common/log.asp?KEY=enerfax
-------------------------------------------------------------

Please welcome our advertisers by visiting these websites.http://www.e-acumen.com http://www.kwi.com/ http://www.fea.com/ http://www.caminus.com/ http://www.progas.net/wip http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com/ http://www.energyseminars.com http://www.desert-crossing.com http://www.epis.com http://www.rwbeck.com  http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .


I hope you are doing well.  I finally have my laptop so I can at least read
email during the day.  The weather here is gorgeous.  It's about 72 during
the day and cooler at night.  We went to a restaurant that had a "tunnel of
fudge" por d'creme.  Someone at the table said there is a similar recipe in
the Charlie Trotter cookbook.  Do you have that cookbook?  I know you have a
lot of them.  I fly hime Friday night and arrive in Houston on Saturday
morning at 6:30 am.  Mike should be waiting for me at my house and I can't
wait to see the Phoebe and sports dog a/k/a Chloe.  How's mother and daddy?
I can't send mother email because she may pick it up on her voice mail. Love,
sas

PS  Are you working on Friday?


Julie,
 I have reprinted the confirm that I forwarded to you for Lee .  He extended
it for four months through May.  I will forward it to you if it gets signed.


That sounds good.

Harry

From: Saji John@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 02/07/2001 10:39 AM
To: Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Meeting on RSL Capacity Auctions

Harry,

How about meeting today between 2:00PM and 3:00PM.

Thanks

Saji John


why can't we use their contract to bill penalties


I show that we adjusted pricing for excess volumes for the following dates:

Mar 11-31    15,000/day delivered to Mobil Beaumont at IF HSC - .045

April 5-19 15,000/day delivered to Mobil Beaumont at IF HSC - .055.  An
outage occurred on the 5th, so the deliveries to Mobil didn't acutally start
until the   12th.

If you need anything else, let me know.

Daren

"Bruce McMills" <bmcmills@duke-energy.com> on 08/30/2000 01:28:47 PM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc: "Marta K Henderson" <mkhenderson@duke-energy.com>
Subject: Discrepancies in Price of Gas redelivered at Mobil Beaumont

I thought it might be easier to reply by email of the
period, volume, and price for periods when the
price for gas redelivered by Duke at Mobil Beaumont was not
HSC Monthly Index - $.0375.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 10:22 AM -----

	eserver@enron.com
	03/12/2001 12:24 PM

		 To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - General Expenses

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: John Hardy Jr Jr.
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: General Expenses
Report Total: $12,435.04
Amount Due Employee: $89.90

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


Just FYI.

Assistants:  Please make note of the new rate for next year!

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 12/15/2000 08:22 AM -----

	Corporate Accounts Payable
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	12/14/2000 06:54 PM

		 To: All Enron Employees United States
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2001 Mileage Reimbursement Rate

The IRS has announced that the standard mileage rate for use of a personal
automobile for business will be 34 1/2 cents per mile starting January 1,
2001.  Enron's policy is to follow IRS guidelines, so use this rate for all
mileage incurred on or after that date.


It happens to all of us!

I still have a bizillion roses in my yard.  I love them, and I don't baby
them.  I figure if they die, I replace them, since they aren't that expensive.

I would love to include my friend Carlos Sole from EECC for my birthday lunch.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/03/2001 03:24 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Your Birthday

I only invited Dan and Sheila.  Dan has rsvpd yes, but I don't think Sheila
has even had a chance to look at her emails.  Want to keep it just us?  Where
would you like to go?  I'm going to put it on our calendars.  Would you like
to invite Neil too?

Oh, I decided I'm going to start growing roses since mine have done so well.
I'm going to put them in pots though (to start).  I like it that I can cut
them and put them in vases in the house.  I have to have something to put in
all the pretty vases I have.  I've ordered a Purple Chariot Miniature, Fairy
Polyantha, Red Fairy Polyantha, Cancun Hybrid Tea Rose (this is gorgeous),
and Yellow Magic Rose (for borders). Those hibiscus are pretty but they only
last one day.  Uh oh, I'm turning into Mother!!!!!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/03/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Your Birthday

Sounds good.  I prefer to keep it kind of small, if that's ok with you.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/03/2001 03:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Your Birthday

Dan and I (so far) would like to take you to lunch on your birthday.   I see
you are free on your calendar, but I didn't know if you already have
tentative plans.  Would you like to go?


Effective 5/4/01, Eastrans deliveries and redeliveries will be 0 MMBtu/dy.
----- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on 05/03/01 08:45 AM
-----

                    Marta K
                    Henderson            To:     briley@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, Connie
                                         Wester/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, dfarmer@enron.com, Daniel C
                    05/02/01             Rider/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Darrel F. Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Donna
                    09:16 AM             C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna J Dobb/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John C
                                         Lehman/Field/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Julia A. Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Lee C.
                                         Spivey/Field/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Michael R. Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Poe
                                         Reed/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Ronald C. Douglas/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Sharon
                                         Beemer/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, William E. Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Sharon
                                         K Asbill/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Chris J Walters/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Eastrans Nomination change effective 5/3/01

Please increase deliveries into Eastrans to 10,000 MMBtu/dy effective
5/3/01.

The redeliveries will be 10,000 MMBtu/dy into the Cartwheel.


Attached is the schedule for the company planes for the Management Conference
in San Antonio on Nov. 15-17.  Please contact me if you have any questions or
changes.

Thanks!

Vanessa


Good morning Ms. JOnes,

If you are experiencing issues with eRequest, please call the Resolution
Center at 3-1411.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Security

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 03/20/2001 03:46 PM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests

Can someone call me at x33399.  I'm in the middle of doing these again and it
won't let me submit the form.

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	03/20/2001 01:08 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: eRequests

Good afternoon Ms. Jones,

No request were found for Angela Davis, Linda Sietzema and Sharon Crawford;
if you have the request numbers, please provide them (sometimes eRequest will
not find the client by name).  The request for Marcus Nettelton appears OK.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 03/20/2001 10:32 AM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests

I just did a request to get Angela Davis in the Houston Office and Linda
Sietzema and Sharon Crawford in the Calgary offices edit access to the
Financial Trading Agreement Database.  I also requested that Marcus Nettelton
get edit access to the ENA Legal Online Trading Database.  I'm not sure if I
did the "erequest" all ok.  Can you check to make sure your got all four?
Thanks!

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	02/27/2001 01:12 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: eRequests 20721 & 20740

Good afternoon,

Please submit an eRequest for the access request (all 5-7 people can be
placed on one request).

To view the Group members, please open the ECT Address book, click on Groups,
then double-click on the name of the group.  Please let us know if there are
any questions.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 02/27/2001 11:31 AM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests 20721 & 20740

ECT HOU_LN1/ECT
Legal\new_swp.nsf

I will be having about 5-7 other people that I will need added to this
database.  Should I send these requests back directly to you, or do them
through the system as well?

Also, there are two ways of getting edit access through this database.  One
is for employees of Legal, who can then enter Legal comments, and the other
is for employees of Credit, who can then enter Credit comments.  Do you see
that choice?  Is there some way for me to verify which employees of Legal and
which employees of Credit have what access?  I know that some employees of
Credit have Legal access by mistake.  Can I get lists of the Legal and Credit
breakdowns?

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	02/27/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: eRequests 20721 & 20740

Good morning,

Please provide the path to the Financial Trading Agreement database.  The
information can be found by right-clicking on the database icon, then
selecting Database properties.  The Server and File name will be under the
Basic tab.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Security


Attached is the bio I've been using for Jeff for the past several months.
Please let me know if you see any updated needed.  Thanks, SRS

PS - The boilerplate was updated today...


Sally,
Angela Sprock forwarded your VM to me regarding the VAR training that you
were looking to set up for your group.

I've taken the liberty of getting in touch with the suppliers to talk to them
about the request and their availability. As well as discussing putting on
the 2 day course solely for you group, I also discussed with them the
possibility of breaking it up and delivering it in shorter  modules. Although
they considered this, they are insistent that the course structure, the
activities and the content lend themselves better to the 2 day format.
They are a very busy company, in much demand both within Enron and other
companies. Their earliest available dates are: September 14-15, and September
21-22.

Alternatively, they have more flexibility on dates later in the year (October
onwards - but that may be less of a fit).

How does this fit with your group?
Let me know if you want to discuss this further

Tim
36698


dear John,
thanks for the interest.
The Brionvega rr 126 is for sale and it is working, even if the record
played it is not perfect(but working too).
The price is $ 1.500.000 and the shipping price could be around $250.000.
Thanks and regards.
Sabrina e Diego

----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Griffith@enron.com>
To: <zebradesign@libero.it>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 7:55 PM
Subject: Brionvega rr 126

> Dear Sirs,
>
> I noticed that you had a stereo by Brionvega (rr126) on your website.  Is
> this for sale?  What is the price in US dollars?  What do you think the
> shipping would be to the US (Houston, TX)?  Thanks and have a great day.
>
> John Griffith
>


Hi Monique,

We have a mutual friend, Natasha Sims.  Natasha and I attend the same church
and sing in the choir together, and we were talking yesterday about Mary Kay
products and she told me that you are her rep and that we work at the same
place.  What a coincidence!  To top it all off, I received an e-mail from
Angie Collins and your name was also on the e-mail, so I said, "I have got to
send her an e-mail".  Well, anyway, I would like to order some products.

I would like the cleanser for normal skin, a concealer in the ebony bronze,
and a black liquid eyeliner.  Please let me know if you have these items in
stock and what the charge is an when we can hook up!

  Thank you so much.

Patrice
X35772


Please see email below.

Thanks,
Donna

---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Teal/HOU/EES on 02/01/2002 08:12 AM ---------------------------
From:	Dianna Dupree/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/31/2002 05:01 PM
To:	Donna Teal/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Rodeo Tickets

Donna,

Would you please post that I have 4 rodeo tickets to Los Tigres del Notre and Ramon Ayala y Sus del Norte - Sunday, Feb. 24.

Thanks,
Dianna
x36031


I just talked to Tino Monaldo, Dennis Langley's lawyer/project manager for
the Pueblo project.  I explained Bill and Bill's credentials and concerns and
Tino suggested that a sit down between Enron and their government contracts
team might be helpful.  He offered to do it in Houston, probably late next
week or the following week.  Attending would be Dennis, Tino, and their
outside lawyers, Jim Slattery and Rick Harrington.  Harrington is the key--he
is a retired military guy and one of the lead govt. contracts lawyers at my
old firm in DC.  The would basically put on a dog and pony walking us all
through their sole source strategy,  including their legal interpretations
and the allies they have lined up within DOE/DOD.  Bill and Bill--does such a
meeting sound productive?  If so, should we have outside govt. contracts
counsel present and if so, who do you suggest?

On a related note, Tino explained (without me asking or really caring) that
he was in the middle of a "big drafting project"--revising Dennis' joint
venture agreement with the Isleta.  I took the opportunity to express my
concern at how far down the road Dennis is getting on the overall deal,
including structure issues, without knowing whether Enron is even on board.
I reminded Tino that GPG has not committed to participating in the pipeline
or the power plant, and that we have not obtained ENA's agreement to commit
turbines.   Apparently Dennis believes that if the economics pans out, Enron
or someone else yet to be identified will magically jump in to the deal with
money, turbines, etc.   If Enron does eventually decide to get into this
deal, the agreements and promises that Dennis has already made may need to be
revisited.   Thanks for your patience on this project.  DF


PP's Party:? Thank you all so much for wanting us to be a part of the big
bash.? We can come over Friday night, but need to be back in Napa by 5 pm on
Saturday for the Mondavi gala.? So we will be there most of the day on
Saturday.? I presume we'll get directions and times, etc.? Do you want us to
bring a case of Coastal??? Did you invite Liz Sellers?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


You are in charge of your own destiny.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 03:49
PM ---------------------------
From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 12/11/2000 03:39 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Opportunities at ENA- Carlos' resume

Kay, I had already requested that Michelle Cash set up an interview with
Carlos; I had reviewed his resume and thought that he looked like a promising
candidate.  I am glad to hear of your strong recommendation.  Thanks BNG


1.  Agree to delete reference to Enron Corp. guarantee.

2.  Agree that 22.3 probably not applicable in off-balance sheet projects but
perhaps this language would apply in cases where this form contract is
someday used outside of Enext.  Since GE has already agreed to it and since
we are stuffing the Enext provisions into the override letter maybe we should
keep 22.3 in the form contract.

	John G Rigby
	05/24/2001 06:17 PM

		 To: "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>@ENRON
		 cc: John.G.Rigby@enron.com, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Scott
Dieball (E-mail)" <scott.dieball@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>
		 Subject: RE: Old (Moldy by now) assignment language text.

I would let GE holler for the Enron Corp Guarantee.

	"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>
	05/24/2001 05:39 PM

		 To: <John.G.Rigby@enron.com>
		 cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "Scott Dieball (E-mail)" <scott.dieball@enron.com>
		 Subject: RE: Old (Moldy by now) assignment language text.

The current form does not have the subcontract assignability language
and I agree that I am not sure we need 22.3.   Question to the team,
should I just put in the first part? Do we need language regarding an
Enron Corp. guarantee?

-----Original Message-----
From: John.G.Rigby@enron.com [mailto:John.G.Rigby@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com; Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com
Subject: Old (Moldy by now) assignment language text.

Peter:

Below is assignment language that we used in our going master before we
entered into the era of the off balance sheet structures.  I do not
recall
whether we have the subcontract assignability language.  I question
whether
we need 22.3.

This  Agreement or any right or obligation contained herein may be
assigned
by Purchaser without Seller's consent to:

     (i)  an Affiliate;

     (ii)  a  Joint  Venture, Partnership, or other similar entity in
which
          Purchaser  or  Purchaser's  Affiliate  is  a venturer, partner
or
          participant;

     (iii)     Owner;

     (iv) Lender; or

     (v)   to  any  entity  for  the  purposes  of financing or sale of
the
          Facility.

Except  for  (i)  through  (v)  above,  this  Agreement  may be assigned
by
Purchaser  to  other  parties only upon the prior written consent of
Seller
which shall not be unreasonably withheld.  When duly assigned in
accordance
with the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to
the  benefit  of  the  assignee; any other assignment by Purchaser shall
be
void and without force or effect.

22.3     Agreement  with  Lender.   Seller  agrees  that  if  requested
by
Purchaser,  Seller  shall  enter  into a direct agreement with Lender
under
which Lender is permitted to "step into" this Agreement.

22.4    Assignment  of  Vendor  Agreements.  All Seller's subcontracts
with
Vendor  which  have  prices equal to or greater than $500,000 shall
include
provisions  giving  Seller  an  unrestricted  right  to assign the
relevant
subcontract  and  call  benefits,  interests,  rights  and  cause of
action
arising under it to Purchaser without Vendor's prior permission.


Does seem a bit of an issue - who is in charge of this?  Robert?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dinari, Sabra L.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:17 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet; Oxley, David; Beck, Sally; Hall, Bob M; Olson, Cindy; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Terminated Employees' Benefits

Happy New Year all,

I have been with Enron for over 16 years and I have made some very good friends during my time here and right now I am feeling their pain and panic.  I talk to several of my terminated friends (and sister) each week and get updates from them on what is going on outside of Enron.  I just want to do whatever I can to help them get through these hard times, this is the reason for my weekly reminders to you all who have the power to do something for them.

I passed on the phone numbers for Towers Perrin and other numbers that they need to get their money from the Cash Balance Plan or to find out more about the COBRA benefits, etc. but there is a major stumbling block in their way right now.  They keep being told that no one can do anything for them, not even send them the necessary forms to get the ball rolling on these benefits, because Enron has not changed their status from active to terminated (or inactive).  How can it possibly take a month to get this status changed?  Please realize that a lot of these people have nothing:  no paycheck coming in, no unemployment checks YET, no retirement, no cash balance money, no medical benefits....they are feeling scared and panicked....PLEASE lets do something to help them.  I have no clue what all it takes to get 4,500+ employees status changed but surely it cannot take a month to accomplish this.  Whomever is in charge of getting this done, are we sure they have a sense of urgency about the situation?  People could lose their homes, cars, etc. while they are waiting on all this red tape....this is very important.

Please advise.

Sabra Dinari


Ugh.  Call me when you get in--I've got a 1:30 conf. call but otherwise am clear.  Seems to me we will, at minimum, need to have gas control and commercial folks on high alert to persuade/bully people into not screwing us for a while.  Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Fossum, Drew
Subject: Operational issues

Drew we need to talk today about the operational issues that we are likely to face when TW files bankruptcy.  Basically I believe parties will start shorting us gas and TW is the least prepared of any of our pipes to deal with this as we have no penalty provisions,. No OFOs.  We may need emergency FERC help with this.  I will be in the office by noon
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


FYI,
More info. you need to be aware of. If you have any questions let me know, or you can call John Sturn.
Jerry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 11:37 AM
To:	January, Steve
Cc:	Spraggins, Gary; Graves, Jerry; Stephens, LD; Howard, Randy; Miller, Dave; Reed, Ray; mike.stage@dynegy.com <mailto:mike.stage@dynegy.com>; steve.herber@dynegy.com <mailto:steve.herber@dynegy.com>; penny.mccarren@dynegy.com <mailto:penny.mccarren@dynegy.com>
Subject:	Re: FW: Proposed Holcomb South Flow Test

Steve,

If I don't receive any major comments on my note, I'll set up a conference call for Monday, April 1 (really I will), to talk through converting to this configuration.  It may be done in stages, e.g. close the valve north of Mesa first, then north of Tate, then finally north of Finney 2.  There is some concern about moving liquids around when the flow is reversed.  Also April 2 is the target date, but there is nothing magic about it, if we need to slip back.

Finney 3 is one of the "related issues" to be resolved.  As you know, people have been working on a posting reminding everyone of our 950 BTU/SCF tariff requirement.  My understanding is Marketing would contact the Finney 3 shippers after the posting giving them a month to find someplace else for Finney 3.  I foresee during the test period that Finney3 would be subject to shut in.  With no Tekas, CIG would have to be about 35 MM/D to make 950 BTU east of Finney 3.  If CIG is too low, we would have to shut in Finney 3.  A variation on this is to lower the minimum operational BTU value to 925 BTU/SCF for the Burdett line.  This would lower the required CIG volume to about 20 MM/D.  It has been determined that 925 BTU gas would be workable for the Burdett loads that in the past have operated at 950 BTU for extended time periods.  Physically the gas would burn.  But a formal decision to operate at 925 BTU has not been made.

If anyone has any different/more current/better information on the BTU issue, please let me know.

John

From:	Steven January/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:January/ENRON@enronXgate> on 03/25/2002 10:50 AM
To:	Gary Spraggins/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Spraggins/ENRON@enronXgate>, Jerry Graves/ENRON@enronXgate <mailto:Graves/ENRON@enronXgate>, John Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON <mailto:Sturn/ET&S/Enron@ENRON>
cc:

Subject:	FW: Proposed Holcomb South Flow Test

Let's make sure the Gas Controllers are fully up to speed on this. What is going to happen to the Finney 3 gas during this test? sj

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturn, John
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 10:29 AM
To:	Stephens, LD
Cc:	Holcomb-Fld-Comp, Team; Holcomb-Maint, Team; Hugoton-Plant, Team; Sublette, Team; Burdett, Team; Mullinville-Maintenance, Team; Mullinville-Operations, Team; Holcomb-Fld-Comp, Team; Tate, Team; ken.anderson@dynegy.com <mailto:ken.anderson@dynegy.com>; dave.kolarik@dynegy.com <mailto:dave.kolarik@dynegy.com>; Howard, Randy; Miller, Dave; Reed, Ray; Pribble, Dan; January, Steve; Spraggins, Gary; Graves, Jerry; Gaines, David; Hallowell, Dean; Peschka, Mike; Bushton-Maintenance, Team; Bushton-Operations, Team; Macksville, Team
Subject:	Proposed Holcomb South Flow Test

LD,

As we discussed at our 03/19/02 meeting, below is the proposed configuration for the April test flowing volumes south from Holcomb.

BACKGROUND

A background for those not at the meeting:  NNG Marketing is in discussions with Oneok about re-routing Rich stream gas in order to restart the Bushton Helium plant.  The proposal being pursued is to leave the higher CO2 CIG gas in the Burdett line and shift more of the remaining gas flow from the Burdett line to the Sublette-Mullinville line.  The Burdett line would then be routed to the Lean inlet at Bushton and Oneok would receive only the Mullinville volumes into the Rich inlet.  The Helium plant would operate on a reduced total volume, but would avoid receiving any higher CO2 gas.

Oneok has stated that about 260 MM/D of flow from Mullinville would allow them to operate their Helium plant.  To accomodate this the block valve north of Finney 2 would be closed routing all the Finney 2 and 4, Tate and Mesa volumes south to Hugoton.  At Hugoton this gas would be routed to the Oklahoma suction and compressed to Sublette.

To accomplish this, modifications would be made at the Sunflower meter/regulator station to allow operation at a lower inlet pressure.  Piping would be added to the Hugoton yard to route the Holcomb gas to the OK suction.  However, a temporary re-routing of gas using existing Hugoton yard piping was found.  This can only be done on a short term basis duing cool weather as it involves taking three dehy contactors out of service.

So the plan is to reroute this gas beginning April 2 and continue through the rest of the month.  This would also be communicated to Oneok, giving them an opportunity to test run their Helium plant on the lower volume, if they chose to.  If all related issues are resolved and an agreement is signed with Oneok, the piping modifications would be made in May.

PIPELINE CONFIGURATION

The schematics below utilize actual volumes from 03/19/02 in a model tuned to actual conditions.  The model utilizes 03/19/02 volumes, but has the block north of Finney 2 closed and the gas routed to the Hugoton Oklahoma suction.  Note the horsepower values in this schematic are not accurate.

Note that with these actual volumes and April ambient and ground temperatures, Fowler and Macksville do not run.  Finney 2 and 4 discharge around 235 PSIG; Tate is predicted at 205 PSIG.  BTU's from Finney 2 to Tate are at the Finney2/4 value of about 922 BTU, but are at 963 BTU at Tate.  Note also that BTU's on the Burdett line are good with 968 BTU east of Finney 3.  The Burdett line BTU's are of course contingent on adequate CIG volumes.

COMPRESSION CONFIGURATION

Below are the results of detailed compression calculations that I did.  I used actual suction temperatures most places and a couple of model predicted suction temperatures where I did not have actuals.  There is some uncertainty about the Hugoton Kansas compression as I may not have accounted for possible re-circulation flow routing correctly.  I still expect it to be workable though.

TEST DATA COLLECTION

We have compressor unit information available most places via SCADA.  For Finney 2, 4 and Tate it would be helpful if the teams could send average daily values for the units on, suction and discharge pressure, RPM and step.  They can be sent to me via email or FAX, 620-562-3511.  If operations are smooth after the first week or so, we could discontinue the data collection.

These are engineering numbers and it is not an exact science.  But looking it all over I believe there is adequate margin for error and that this is a workable configuration.  If anyone sees real problems with it, please let me know.

FYI - Am working on a plan for pressure sweeping the Hugoton to Holcomb line, tentatively planned for this Wednesday.

Thanks,

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
10:37 AM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Video

---------------------- Forwarded by Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000 08:23
AM ---------------------------

Paul T Lucci@ENRON
07/18/2000 03:24 PM
To: Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Video

Show this to Matt and Kenny, I got from Legler.

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT on 07/18/2000 04:23
PM ---------------------------

Michael J Legler
07/14/2000 12:27 PM
To: Scott Sitter/DEN/ECT@Enron, Theresa Staab/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Barker Varnell/DEN/ECT@Enron, Tyrell Harrison/DEN/ECT@Enron, Dan J
Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, Mark Whitt/DEN/ECT@Enron, Don Baldridge/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Ken Choyce/DEN/ECT@Enron, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc:
Subject: Video

Lends credence to those that say you should never go to the bathroom in an
open field!!!

This is absolutely hilarious!!

Enjoy!

 - frens2.mpg


Because I have to go to a PRC meeting all Day, and Donald will be out that Day,  here is the plan:

Stacy moves to MidC to train with Donald all next week,

Cara schedules the Rockies all next week

When Donald Returns, he trains with Cara until he is ready to take over, and then takes the Rockies.

We wanted to do it anyway, now we have a reason.

c


I have been billing Koch Midstream Services Co under ENA for meters
LL-1-0030-Comitas (Sitara #144052) and LL-1-0027-Volpe (Sitara #144049).  My
former accounting contact at Koch, Michael Thomas, said that Koch sold these
south texas assets to Duke Energy Field Services back in 1999.  Michael faxed
a contract which I forwarded to Cindy Balfour Flannigan in the contract
area.  Cindy said she can't tie the deals in the contract to our system so
she can't recognize the assignment.  Cindy has left messages with Koch, but
she has not been able to resolve the issue.    Koch is refusing to pay for
the gas and there is currently over a million dollars outstanding relating to
these deals.  I need to find out whether Koch or Duke is responsible for
paying for this gas.  Do you have any information regarding this issue?

Thanks,
Tina Valadez
3-7548

---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 02:47 PM

To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Tina,

With regards ti the Koch Midstream, you could talk to Daren Farmer about it.
Also, Carlos Rodriguez could help.

Ami


thank you for the invite.  But I will not be able to attend.
  thnks
Sandra


Christie,

Look fwd to the trip.

Shirley is sending you my itinerary.
When are you flying back? What about a dinner on
Tuesday?

Vince

From: Christie Patrick on 02/16/2001 10:10 AM
To: stamer@wharton.upenn.edu, piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wharton Business Plan Competition

Hi Anne!

I'll be at Wharton on Tuesday the 20th--perhaps we can get  together to
discuss this sometime later in the afternoon.  What does your schedule look
like?

Thanks!

--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:08 AM -----

	"Stamer, Anne" <stamer@wharton.upenn.edu>
	01/26/2001 03:47 PM

		 To: "'christie_patrick@enron.com'" <christie_patrick@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wharton Business Plan Competition

Dear Christie:

Thank you for your voice mail. Things  are moving along nicely with the
competition.   Phase II deadline was today, so we hope to have some
statistics in the next few weeks.  I have attached the statistics from Phase
I, for your files.  Listed below are ways that Enron could be involved, let
me know in which (or all) of these Enron would be interested in participating.

* We want to start listing our sponsors, so it would be really good if we
could get your logo.

* Also, does Enron wish to be a Judge in Phase III and the Venture Fair
(VF)?  For Phase III, we would mail each Judge about 3 full blown business
plans to be ranked. We anticipate this taking no more than 1 afternoon

*  For the VF, we would need a Judge to be present for the entire day.   The
VF is by invitation only and we anticipate about 350 students, venture
capitalists, business entrepreneurs and faculty.  The VF will be held in
Philadelphia on April 30th.

* At the VF we will provide an opportunity for our sponsors with a 6 foot
table for exhibits or materials to hand out.  We will need to know if you
wish to use the exhibit space.

*  We plan on providing our 25 semi-finalist teams with one-on-one
mentoring.  If Enron is interested, that would be about 1/2 or 1 day
commitment.

*  There might be an opportunity for a workshop to the University community.
Would Enron be interested in participating in something like this?

I look forward to working with you to make this year's BPC a success.  Thank
you.

Sincerely,

Anne Stamer

 <<Phase IOverview.doc>>

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Anne Stamer
Wharton Business Plan Competition
Wharton Entrepreneurial Programs
The Wharton School
419 Vance Hall, 3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104-6374
215-746-6460 (Direct)
215-898-4856 (Office)
215-898-1299 (fax)
stamer@wharton.upenn.edu
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 - Phase IOverview.doc


I am not aware of the nuances of copper trading!  However, I left a message
earlier this morning to find out from the MG lawyer.  I haven't heard back.
The deal ticket should provide for the premium payment date and, if not, I
would use our standard language.  Sara

	Souad Mahmassani
	08/14/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Copper Trades

Sara / Susan,

On copper option trades, do you know when the premium is usually due?  Does
the standard 2 days rule still applies to this commodity?
Thanks,


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


how is everything going?  are you guys staying cool down there.  i know it
has been hot.  i will try to call soon.


Enron is sponsoring the McCombs School of Business, Transforming Business in
Net Time 2001 Symposium on March 27 & 28 in Austin, Texas.  As a sponsor,
Enron has received 4 complimentary registrations and 4 VIP Reception passes
that I will make available to the first 4 people that would like to attend
this conference.  Ken Lay is the Keynote speaker on March 27th and Greg Piper
is serving on the B2B Marketplaces panel on March 28th.  Below is an early
draft of the conference.   For more complete details, visit
www.nettime2001.org .   If you are interested in attending, please contact me
at 713-853-7632 and I will send you the special code to receive Enron's
complimentary registration.  You can register on line at the above address or
I can send the tri-fold brochure with details if you are interested.
Remember, you must contact me to receive the code for the complimentary
registrations.  Details on hotel and parking will be forthcoming.

Thanks,

Karen Marshall

March 27-28, 2001 in Austin, Texas

The McCombs School of Business
In partnership with the Texas eCommerce Association
presents

Transforming Business in Net Time:
Models and Strategies to Leverage the Internet

The Program

Tuesday, March 27, 2001

Opening Keynote Speaker
5:00-6:00 p.m. ) Networking Happy Hour
6:00-7:30 p.m. ) Opening Keynote:  Kenneth Lay, Chairman, Enron

Wednesday, March 28, 2001

Morning Keynote Speaker
8:00-9:30 a.m. ) Morning Keynote:  TBD

Transforming Enterprise Assets via the Digital Economy
9:45-10:45 a.m. ) Moderated Panel Discussion
Faculty Moderator ) Dr. Vish Krishnan
Featured panelists
? Rick Toboz, Director, eTransformation for eVentures, Cargill, Incorporated
? Tim Morton, President, e.Solutions-United States and Latin America, EDS
? TBD from i2 Technologies
This is not your father,s business model.  Successful businesses use the
Internet as more than a tool for connection.  It,s not just contracts*it,s
contacts.  It,s not just moving things through the community*the community
itself creates value.  See how new business models inform the tools that
facilitate them.  Learn from classic enterprises that are transforming core
competencies into 21st century assets.

Collaborative Economic Networks Power the New Business Models
11:00 a.m. -12:00 noon ) Four Interactive Discussions with Commentary
(40-minute panel discussion followed by 20-minute research perspective)
Choose one of four perspectives on new ways of thinking and doing business.

Open versus Closed Systems Session #1
Industry Facilitator )Tom Felger, Partner, Baker Botts, L.L.P.
Faculty Commentator ) Dr. Emerson Tiller
Featured Panelists
? TBD
? TBD
? TBD
Should a collaborative economic network be open or closed?  Standards-based
or orchestrated by a dominant industry leader?  What kind of network will
best serve the businesses of the 21st century?

Internet Models: The Next Generation Session #2
Industry Facilitator ) Ken DeAngelis, General Partner, Austin Ventures
Faculty Commentator ) Dr. Kerem Tomak
Featured Panelists
? Judi Bitterli, CEO, Powered, Inc.
? Jim Hammock, CEO, hire.com
? Dave Sikora, CEO, Question.com
What kinds of companies power the new collaborative networks?  From finding
top talent to accelerating education to managing knowledge, hear what the
winners have to say.

B2B Marketplaces: What,s Next? ) Session #3
Industry Facilitator ) Kevin Costello, Partner, Arthur Andersen
Faculty Commentator ) Dr. Prabhudev Konana
Featured panelists
? TBD
? Greg Piper, Managing Director, Enron Net Works
? TBD
Pundits predict that there will be 150,000 Internet marketplaces by 2003 and
15 by 2005.
Who will survive in the new collaborative community of trade? Learn from
these emerging examples of trading networks that work.

Customer Relationship Management ) Session #4
Industry Facilitator -
Faculty commentator ) Dr. Raj Srivastava
Featured panelists
? TBD
? Patrick Vogt, Director, e-Relationships, Dell
? TBD
Who owns the new collaborative networks?  How do you attract, serve, retain
and capitalize on the most critical node in the network ) the customer?

LUNCH - 12:15-1:45 p.m.
Sponsor acknowledgement
Featured Presenter
Dr. Anitesh Barua of the McCombs School Center for Research in Electronic
Commerce
Digital vs. Physical Models ) not only gaining efficiencies, but creating new
revenue streams

Digital versus Physical Business Models
2:00-3:15 p.m. ) Moderated Panel Discussion
Faculty Moderator ) Dr. Cynthia Beath
Featured panelists
? TBD
? TBD
? TBD
We began the day with taking old models and making them new.  We,ve looked at
communities and deepening connections.  Now we,re looking to the future.
Harness the power of the Internet to move objects, capital, and ideas, and
create sources of revenue never before imagined.

Closing Comments
3:15-4:00 p.m. - Dr. Steven Tomlinson