Acknowledgments of General Electric Company

General Electric Company (&GE8) hereby:

  (a) acknowledges that the assignment by DevCo to LLC and quitclaim by ENA
to LLC of all of the Assigned Rights is permitted under Section 22.2(a)(vi)
of each of the Assigned Contracts and furthermore, agrees to such assignment
as contemplated by this Agreement; and

  (b) acknowledges that, as of the Effective Time and pursuant to Section
22.2(b) of each of the Assigned Contracts, (i) all references to the
Purchaser or the Agent in each of the Assigned Contracts shall be deemed to
be references to LLC, (ii) the Assigned Contracts and the Assigned Rights
(which include, for the avoidance of doubt and without limitation, any and
all associated warranties in connection therewith) and Assumed Obligations
shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of LLC, (iii) each of
DevCo and ENA shall be irrevocably relieved of and forever discharged of and
from all liability  under the Assigned Contracts, and (iv) GE shall look only
to LLC for the performance of the Assumed Obligations assigned pursuant to
this Agreement.


Hi Sarah -

The Enron attendees for tomorrow's meeting are:  Ken Lay, Marty Sunde and Bob
Williams.  Their resumes are attached.

Sarah, will you please e-mail me exactly where they should come once they get
through traffic.

Thanks.

Rosalee


You are welcome.  I'm glad you enjoyed them.

"Berk Donaldson" <bdonaldson@duke-energy.com> on 03/12/2001 03:15:46 PM
To: Chris.Germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Many Thanks!!!

I just wanted to drop you a line to thank you so very much for the Rockets
tickets last Thursday.  My family and I had a great time.  My daughters
were saying that we were so close that they could see the sweat on Moochie
Norris' head.  Their school's basketball team played that afternoon in the
Compaq Center, so they were able to see a lot of their friends.  Their
friends were very jealous of the great seats that we had.

Thanks again ...

Berk Donaldson

Phone:  (713) 627-4488
Fax:    (713) 627-5658
Pager:  (888) 777-3118
Cell:   (713) 503-3997


Yes,

I shall be glad to make a presentation.
Thanks for considering me.

Vince

ZZMACMAC@aol.com on 01/31/2001 08:01:23 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SMS conference

The Strategic Management Society is holding its annual meeting in San
Francisco Oct 21 to 24
We have a panel on Real Options, the thrustof which I attach.  I was
wondering if you would be interested in presenting on the practitioner's
perspective - if not you would one of your colleagues be interested?

 - SMS 2001 1-23-01.doc


that's a really old one, but definitely one of my favorites.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kristen Iles [mailto:Kristen_Iles@liverpool.k12.ny.us]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:24 PM
To: jsvarc@twcny.rr.com; billmeehan@adelphia.net; Bravodino9@aol.com;
fiercestrs@hotmail.com; Catherine_Osinski@liverpool.k12.ny.us;
BrianRScan@aol.com; lluttin1@twcny.rr.com;
bluttinger@productionmonsters.com; dg_stuart@hotmail.com;
mgroupllc@msn.com; Smith, Matt; kweir11@home.com;
jeffjacklin@hotmail.com; geoffbones@hotmail.com; sarah_iles@hotmail.com;
sariddle@hotmail.com; ilesn@hotmail.com
Subject: Fwd: blinddate

You guys know I can't stand forwards but this is a hilarious vidio clip!
Enjoy!
Kristen


Title: Mexico Executive Retreat, Presentation Summaries
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2959;

***********************************************************************

As part of the Mexico Energy Advisory Service, CERA presents presentations from
the Mexico Executive Retreat held on Wednesday January 16, 2002. The links in
the report include CERA's presentation and other featured presentations.

Some of the presentations may take up to a minute to load in your browser.

**end**

Follow above URL to access the presentation files.

E-mail Category: Report
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Mexico Gas & Power

*****************************************************************************************
CERAWeek2002 - February 11-15, 2002 - 21st Annual Executive Conference and
Related Events REGISTER ONLINE TODAY AT:  http://www.cera.com/ceraweek
** Two- and Four-day Passes Available
** Special Enrollment Programs
** Partnership Opportunities
** CERAWeek Online Premium Access
*****************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


????
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
08:51 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Scott Healy                           06/07/2000 05:31 PM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Gleason

Bob Virgo has informed me that the desk wants to convert Gleason to combined
cycle.  Bob told me this in the context of asking me whether Calpine would
sell us any additional combined cycle equipment (i.e., steam turbines).  My
guess is they won't.

If 1) it was of interest to us and 2) we are really going to convert Gleason,
I think I could get Calpine to execute a purchase/short term tolling
transaction on Gleason on favorable terms.  I say this for the following
reasons:

1.  Calpine is typically a strong bid for combined cycle installations.
2.  Calpine has been trying unsuccessfully to get a combined cycle project in
TVA (due to their rank in the cue) and thinks that it will take them a year
to get through TVA.  We actually think that their project is blocked.
3.  Calpine would likely take the incremental construction cost risk on the
transaction.
4.  I believe that Calpine would undertake the permitting and interconnection
work at their cost  and risk, if needed.  Given the cost of preparing a
combined cycle permit along with the potential fight that ENA might face from
TVA in such an effort, this risk sharing scenario could be attractive to ENA.
5.  Calpine would likely accept a short term tolling arrangement.  On their
eastern assets, Calpine is generally executing 1-2 year deals.
6.  Calpine particularly in the east has been aggressively purchasing
projects.
7.  If feasible, Calpine would probably be willing to further increase the
size of Gleason.  Calpine's current plants announcements are generally in the
700-1,000 MW range.

I know that Dave Delainey has not previously supported selling Gleason
individually.  However, you may want to investigate if anything has changed
in this circumstance, particularly since we are not generally a strong bid
for combined cycle projects.  Please let me know.

FYI--Dave Duran and I are meeting with Bob Kelly of Calpine on next Tuesday
to discuss the use of Enron NOLs in Calpine's PG&E contract buyouts.


We bought gas from Keyspan at $5.00 intraday today.  We are shipping that IT
to Emporia,  Fuel is 1.52%.  I estimated $.07 for fuel and $.17 for
commodity.  See deal 118105.


Grif,
The following contacts would like to have their information emailed to them. They were both very anxiuos for UBSW to get up and running.

Mieco Inc.
Mr. Bill Glass
(281)775-8900 phone
(281)885-5656 fax
Email: bglass@mieco.com

Texla Energy Management Inc.
Mr. Mark Wilshusen
(713)655-9900 phone
(713)655-9906 fax
Email: markw@texlaenergy.com

Please call me at X37324 if you should have any questions.
Morris


We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:    Master Agreement (Industrial)

Effective Date:   March 21, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Statex Petroleum I, L.P.

Transactions Covered:   All products with the exception of:  weather, pulp
and paper, and foreign exchange


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 79555 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Thank you for changing lives.

Employee ID:  90009775
Name:  DOUGLAS GILBERT-SMITH
Payment Amount:  1380.00
Payment Method:  Deduct a portion from each paycheck
Leadership Giving Roster:  Anonymous
Make a Difference Club:  New Member
Mailing Address:
1301 ARLINGTON ST
HOUSTON , TX  77008
US
Your donation is designated for:  Harris County
Written Acknowledgement of Contribution:  YES

	"You will find, as you look back on your life, that the moments that
stand out are
	the moments when you have done things for others."
		-Henry Drummond

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           10/17/2000 10:13 AM

To: kristi.giron@cfisd.net, hollyw@email.msn.com, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
10:12 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
10/17/2000 10:04 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, bbernard@hypercon.com,
mafullerton@westernhubs.com, lbkudu@gateway.net
cc:
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 10:03 AM
---------------------------

"Clark, Mike" <mclark@ARC-AG.COM> on 10/17/2000 07:24:27 AM
To: "Berg, Cindy" <cberg@ARC-AG.COM>, "Miller, David" <dmiller@ARC-AG.COM>,
"Clark, Graydon" <gclark@arc-ag.com>, "'Greg Couch-Enron'" <gcouch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

-----Original Message-----
From: May, Dallas
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:11 AM
To: Clark, Mike; Graham, Annette; Kirksey, Andy; 'Wayne M.';
'Tammy-Home'; 'rcamp'; 'Marlena'; 'Dean P.'; 'Dawn'
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wallace [mailto:wallace@NSTEXAS.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 6:40 AM
To: Dallas May (E-mail); Brian Crawford (E-mail); Jay Yeaman (E-mail);
J. D. Hancock (E-mail); George Cudworth (E-mail); Rob Hayes (E-mail)
Subject: WORTH SHARING

This one is worth sharing...Guess which global superpower these
>statistics are from:
>
>
>709,000 regular (active duty) service personnel
>
>293,000 reserve troops
>
>Eight standing Army divisions
>
>20 Air Force and Navy air wings with 2,000 combat aircraft
>
>232 strategic bombers
>
>13 strategic ballistic missile submarines with 3,114 nuclear warheads on
>232 missiles
>
>500 ICBMs with 1,950 warheads
>
>Four aircraft carriers and all the support bases, shipyards and logistical
>assets needed to sustain such a force
>
>Is this country Russia? . . . No
>
>Red China? . . . No
>
>Great Britain? . . . Wrong Again
>
>USA? . . . Hardly
>
>Give up??
>
>Well, don't feel too bad if you are unable to identify this global
>superpower because this country no longer exists. It has vanished. These
are
>the American military forces that have disappeared since the 1992 election
>of Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
>
>Sleep well, America. It's time to vote!

 - C.DTF


Last one, Shawnee Springs meter 986315.  Purchase should be from Torch on the
215....  Was on deal ticket 138605, which expired in September, and has been
allocated to up until Nov.   I think that Torch is now Cleco.  There should
be a purch. at the meter.  Once we get the last two, you are done.

Mary


GT,  I will have an extra ticket for the game this weekend.  My friend who was going to go back out.  It is yours if you want to use it.  Let me know.


Steve,

It's really Houston part of the group only.
We have to figure out how to close the gap caused by Grant's departure.

Vince

Steven Leppard
01/10/2001 04:38 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Continuation of Project Meeting

Thanks for the invite Shirley, but 9pm is pushing it a bit, especially on a
Friday night!

Shirley Crenshaw
09/01/2001 20:28
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Steven
Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Continuation of Project Meeting

Hello everyone:

Vince would like to continue his "project meeting" that was cut short this
morning.  The area to be discussed is the Researh reorganization.  We
would like to have schedule this meeting for this Friday, January 12th at
3:00 PM in EB19C2.

Please let me know if you have a problem with this.  Osman will be in
California, but he will join you via conference call.

Thanks!

Shirley

Osman:  The number for the conference room EB19C2 is:  713/853-6336.


Calif. power bond delay may lead to large deficit
NEW YORK, Sept 27 (Reuters) - California state Treasurer Philip Angelides said Thursday the state could face a $9.3 billion budget deficit in the 2002-2003 fiscal year if $12.5 billion of power bonds are not sold before July 2002.
The treasurer is certain the bonds will be sold, but he released the figures in an attempt to pressure the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) into actions it must take in order to sell the bonds.
"What I am concerned about is the fact this law has not been effectuated eight months after it was passed," Angelides said in a telephone news conference in Sacramento, referring to a law passed in February setting the biggest municipal bond sale ever in motion.
The state depleted its general fund by at least $6.2 billion buying electricity to keep power flowing and must sell the bonds in order to refill the state's general fund and make future power purchases.
"There can be no schedule (for the bond sale) until the PUC completes its work," Angelides said.
Earlier this week the PUC said the much-delayed meeting is now set for Oct. 2.
Angelides said PUC Commissioner Jeff Brown, one of five, is on board to make the vote, but President Loretta Lynch and other commissioners, "are not ready to act."
Lynch said earlier this week that she wants more time to work out details with Angelides and the Department of Water Resources concerning the money and terms of the rate order and rate agreement.
How the money from rate increases approved in May will be split up to pay for the bonds and to reimburse troubled power utilities and giving the Department of Water Resources the authority to sell the bonds, still need to be decided by the PUC.
Angelides is projecting a $3.1 billion budget deficit for the 2002-2003 fiscal year, even if the bonds are sold in time, due to reduced revenues as the overall U.S. economy slows.
In a worst case scenario, Angelides added that with the bond sale, the $3.1 billion gap may grow to $4 billion, while a late sale would push the $9.3 billion number to $10.2 billion.
The treasurer painted a dire picture of California 's budget if the bonds are not sold, likening it to the state's budget problems of the early 1990s.
Angelides warned a 2 percent sales tax increase might have to be put in place, or possibly a $1,574 per student cut in state K-12 education spending.
Or, the state could drop all spending on the University of California and California State University and save $6 billion.
Eighteen percent of the state's non-education budget would need to be cut if the bonds are not sold, he said.


Mary Beth:

For what it's worth, I've read this, and if Laura Tyson or Larry Summers sign
it, I have serious concerns about the effect it would have on their ability
to play the role that we envision in moving our proposal forward
(understanding that our odds of success are somewhat meager).  While I don't
disagree with the language, it is strong and therefore very likely to make
the Governor and his staff very uncomfortable.  I would recommend that they
do not sign.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:32 AM -----

	David Teece <teece@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
	01/24/2001 10:56 AM

		 To: tyson@haas.berkeley.edu, tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu,
shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu, willrichm@aol.com, george_barker@lecg.com,
cdanner@wilkandassociates.com, gilbert@econ.berkeley.edu,
scott_harvey@lecg.com, jscadding@wilkandassociates.com,
spiller@haas.berkeley.edu, mwilk@wilkandassociates.com,
phillip_mcleod@lecg.com, berk@haas.berkeley.edu, john_chandley@lecg.com,
jdasovic@enron.com, lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu, william_hogan@harvard.edu,
rmichaels@fullerton.edu, richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu, rschmidt@lecg.com,
pverleger@compuserve.com, joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu, steven@stoft.com
		 cc: peter.gosselin@latimes.com
		 Subject: Final Version-Manifesto

TO:?? Colleagues

SUBJECT:? Final Version

I've done my best to include your very helpful comments.? The document now
also contains a summary.

I would like your endorsement, by noon PST (Wednesday) if possible.? A number
of you have already indicated you would sign it.? Also, Tom Campbell has
indicated he will try to recruit Ken Arrow.? I believe one of you agreed to
recruit Dan McFadden.? Laura is working on Larry Summers.? Solow would be a
great addition, too.

Can we agree on the following division of labor from here out:

1.? Recruiting others:? All

2.? Media representatives:? Campbell, Tyson, Spiller, Verlerger, Wilk,
Teece, and Hogan (This is by no means meant to preclude anyone contacting
the media after we go public.)

??? On media, we are giving the LA Times a 24-hour exclusive.? We won't
release to other media sources until 9:00 AM Thursday.

Many thanks for your involvement and endorsements.

 - Manifesto-final version.doc
======================================
David J. Teece, Director
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
F402 Haas School of Business #1930
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA  94720-1930
Phone:  (510) 642-1075
Fax:  (510) 642-2826
http://haas.berkeley.edu/~imio
======================================


I have opened a new Lotus file "California - working group" where I am
keeping the contact information, but I am assuming you have picked everybody
up already.  If in doubt, check out the file.  thanks


Do not update links when opening file.

Adam Johnson
EnronOnline


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/30/2001>, published as of 11/30/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Hi Mark
Thanks for your mail
I have no problems with the new clauses 4 (f) and (h) .
I will arrange for Natsource LLC alter the letter of credit to send a letter
of guarantee
I will then be  ready to sign the paper work and get going.
Thanks for your help
Ian

----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:34 PM
To: Goldsmith, Ian
Cc: Bob.Shults@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: Natsource-Tullet BETA

Mr. Goldsmith -

I have attached below a copy of the updated BETA reflecting the changes you
proposed earlier. I have added some language to your proposals, but have
kept the intention intact.

The only additional comments that I will make are that Enron will require
(a) a confirmatory letter from Natsource LLC that the LC posted by
Natsource will be applicable to Natsource-Tullet (in essence a guarantee
letter) and (b)  if an LC has already been posted, it will need to be
modified so that it will reflect the ability of Enron to realize under it
for Natsource-Tullet.  If no LC has been issued, this latter point will
need to be handled in any LC issued.

Please take a look at the attached and let me know if anything further.  I
will be checking with our personnel to confirm that Natsource LLC does not
have to be a signatory to this BETA.

(See attached file: beta-natsource-tullet(draft5-29-01).doc)

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000
11:29 AM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM> on 07/27/2000 09:19:47 AM
To: <ehernandez@ci.santa-ana.ca.us>, <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>,
<silviamanzanales@hotmail.com>, <jh306@netzero.net>, <Maria.Soliz@ppfa.org>,
<bandama@ssa.co.orange.ca.us>, <maryloulou@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: A Man's Perspective

TO WOMEN EVERYWHERE FROM A MAN WHO'S HAD ENOUGH...

If you think you're fat, you probably are. Don't ask us. We refuse to
answer.

Learn to work the toilet seat. If it's up, put it down.

If you won't dress like the Victoria's Secret girls, don't expect us to act
like soap opera guys.

Don't cut your hair. Ever. Long hair is always more attractive than short
hair. One of the big reasons guys fear getting married is that married women
always cut their hair, and by then you're stuck with her.

Birthdays, Valentines, and Anniversaries are not quests to see if we can
find the perfect present yet again!

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you
don't want to hear.

Sometimes, we're not thinking about you. Live with it. Don't ask us what
we're thinking about unless you are prepared to discuss such topics as
navel lint, the shotgun formation, or monster trucks.

Sunday = sports. It's like the full moon or the changing of the tides.
Let it be.

Shopping is not a sport, and no, we're never going to think of it that
way.

When we have to go somewhere, absolutely anything you wear is fine.
Really.

You have enough clothes.  You have too many shoes.

Crying is blackmail.

Ask for what you want. Let's be clear on this one: Subtle hints don't work.
Strong hints don't work. Really obvious hints don't work. Just say it!

No, we don't know what day it is. We never will. Mark anniversaries on
the calendar.

Peeing standing up is more difficult. We're bound to miss sometimes.

Most guys own three pairs of shoes-what makes you think we'd be any good
at choosing which pair, out of thirty, would look good with your dress?

Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers to almost every question.

Come to us with a problem only if you want help solving it. That's what
we do. Sympathy is what your girlfriends are for.

A headache that lasts for 17 months is a problem. See a doctor.

Foreign films are best left to foreigners.

Check your oil.

It is neither in your best interest nor ours to take the quiz together.
No, it doesn't matter which quiz.

Anything we said 6 months ago is inadmissible in an argument. All comments
become null and void after 7 days.

If something we said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways
makes you sad or angry, we meant the other one.

Let us ogle. We're going to look anyway; it's genetic.

You can either tell us to do something OR tell us how to do something
but not both.

Whenever possible, please say whatever you have to say during
commercials..

ALL men see in only 16 colors. Peach is a fruit, not a color.

If it itches, it will be scratched.

Beer is as exciting for us as handbags are for you.

If we ask what's wrong and you say "nothing," we will act like nothing's
wrong. We know you're lying, but it's just not worth the hassle.

What the heck is a doily anyway?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------

para Blondi...errr  Charlie:

ogle:  mirar codiciosamente o insinuante
doily:  tapete


Let's talk about this, too.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 09:28 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Ann Elizabeth White                           05/22/2001 10:44 AM

To: Ben Jacoby
cc:
Subject: FW: CN comments on Re: FACT Sheet

Ben

Please be sure to include the team attorney on communications such as this.
Anything that is sent to public relations or government affairs also needs to
be copied to legal.

Thanks!

Ann Elizabeth
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001
10:31 AM ---------------------------
From: Eric Thode/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 09:31 AM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: CN comments on Re: FACT Sheet

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben   On Behalf Of Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:43 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Nicolay, Christi; Thode, Eric; Fairley, David; Robinson, Marchris;
Krimsky, Steven; Sooter, Lea; Grube, Raimund; Hausinger, Sharon; Steffes,
James; Walker, Rebecca
Subject: Re: CN comments on Re: FACT Sheet

OK folks. Let's try this again. Attached are collective comments from me and
Christi. Eric / Rebecca, please follow up where indicated. After we have all
our comments, I will clear the document through Kevin Presto before we
release it publicly.

Please provide final comments as soon as possible. Thanks.

Ben


>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	morisjr@selectenergy.com@ENRON
> Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 4:01 PM
> To:	dperlin@enron.com; stacey.e.dickson@enron.com; Barbe, Robin
> Cc:	gouinmd@NU.COM; puigme@selectenergy.com;
> carlsbl@selectenergy.com
> Subject:	Select Energy - Confirmation No. 1090348
>
> Attached please find Select Energy's notice of objection to the
> general
> terms and conditions (GT&Cs) referenced in deal confirmation #
> 1090348.
> Please review our proposed changes for use in this confirmation as
> well as
> additional transactions until such time that we enter into a master
> gas
> agreement.  We are available to discuss this with you, I can be
> reached at
> 860-665-2411.
>
> (See attached file: Deal #1090348.doc)(See attached file: Memo -
> Enfolio
> GT&Cs Attachment A.doc)
>
> Thank you
> John Morissette
>  - Deal #1090348.doc <<Deal #1090348.doc>>
>  - Memo - Enfolio GT&Cs Attachment A.doc <<Memo - Enfolio GT&Cs
> Attachment A.doc>>
 - Deal #1090348.doc
 - Memo - Enfolio GT&Cs Attachment A.doc


I know you guys have been working around the clock.  I just wanted to make
sure you hadn't forgotten about Mike Dahlke (whose resume I sent on to you
Dan).  When you catch a breath please take some time to consider Mike for
EES.


Not yet.  I thought you spoke to him.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	Miller, Don
Subject:	Re: New Albany

Have you spoken to Chris about LV

From:	Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 06:11 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	New Albany

Louise,

Allegheny is no bid on New Albany.  They want to focus only on technology which allows for combine cycle conversion.  The turbines at New Albany do not accommodate combine cycle conversion.

They are interested in pursuing our Longview development in Washington, and we are going to follow up with them on a couple of sites in Entergy.

It looks like I might really have to work at selling New Albany!!!

Don


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude32.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas32.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil32.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded32.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG32.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG32.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL32.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Please see the attached memo.

Attachments:


When: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:00 AM-12:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US
& Canada).
Where: TBA

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type US
Gas Phy Index Firm 5-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr.  Credit (Tom Moran) has
approved copying the profiles for the new product type from the following:

US Gas Phy Index Firm non-TX>1Mo<1Yr

Please respond by 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 8.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 02:13 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/01/2000 04:52 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Gas Phy Index Firm 5-day Flexible non-TX>1Mo<1Yr - Approval
Required!

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed. This product already exists for products less than 1month.

Mark:  Stacey Dickson has already approved this language.

EXAMPLE:

A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp. (ENA), under which (A)
where ENA is the Buyer,  ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and Counterparty
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the sum of the daily volumes shall equal the 'Total Volume'), and
Counterparty shall deliver to ENA and ENA shall receive a quantity of natural
gas for delivery on each of the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where
(i) the volume of gas delivered on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 20
percent of the Total Volume for that calendar month and (ii) the volume  of
gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be in increments such that that the
sum of said increments equals the Total Volume for that calendar month, or
(B) where ENA is the Seller,  Counterparty shall deliver to ENA  and ENA
shall receive a quantity of natural gas equal to the volume submitted by the
Counterparty via the website for delivery on each day during the Period of
Delivery (the 'Total Volume'), and ENA shall deliver to Counterparty and
Counterparty shall receive a quantity of natural gas for delivery on each of
the Purchase Dates during a calendar month, where the volume of gas delivered
on any Purchase Date shall not exceed 20 percent of the Total Volume for that
calendar month and the volume of gas delivered on all Purchase Dates shall be
in increments such that that the sum of said increments equals the Total
Volume for that calendar month. All deliveries shall be on a firm basis.

The Contract Price shall be the price derived from the Index for that
calendar month, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty via
the website. The Buyer shall pay the Contract price for each calendar month
during the Period  for gas received. The Seller shall pay the Index for each
calendar month for gas received.

The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of __ ___ 2000
to the Termination Date of __  ____ 2000.

The transaction is for delivery at Columbia, Appalachian. The Period of
Delivery shall be from the effective date through the termination date. The
Purchase Dates shall be each of no less than five days as designated by Buyer
within each calendar month during the Period of Delivery. Buyer shall notify
Seller by facsimile of Buyer's designation of a Purchase Date by no later
than 10:45 a.m. Central Prevailing Time on the due date of the pipeline
nomination for the day on which Buyer desires the gas to flow.

The Index for each calendar month shall be the Columbia Gas Transmission
Corp., Appalachia (W. Va., Ohio, Ky.) price as listed in the section entitled
"Prices of Spot Gas Delivered to Pipelines", published in the first issue in
such month of Inside Ferc's Gas Market Report.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


The First Contingency Transmission Cut is also known as "Redispatch."

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:46 PM -----

New meeting request from Richard Shapiro

  02/23/2001 08:00 AM Local Time
  02/23/2001 12:00 PM Local Time

Title: Meeting w/ Seabron Adamson to discuss wholesale market structure
issues... LMP, forward markets, etc.....redefining and better articulating
Enron's policy positions
Location:  -No room information available-

Chair:  Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron

To (required): Steven J Kean/NA/Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT
cc (optional):


In connection with today's meeting regarding financial trading in Australia,
attached please find a short memo from Alan and myself which summarizes the
legal aspects.

We look forward to discussing it with you at 2:30 pm, EB 38C1.

See you then,

Shari


All,

Please see my memo  attached updating you on recent developments in NYISO's  MSWG.

Scott

 - Scott Englander (E-mail).vcf
 - NY Update 2001-11-18.pdf


I would like to schedule a session to review the economics of the received offers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 4:56 PM
To:	Alters, Dennis; Bagot, Nancy; Campbell, Larry; Cebryk, Doug; Centilli, James; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Gadd, Eric; Gottsponer, Morgan; Haden, Sarah ; Hartsoe, Joe; Hass, Glen; Junus, David; Keller, John R.; Kendrick, William; Kilmer III, Robert; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Lokey, Teb; Martin, Jerry D.; Matthews, Ron; Pryor, Tony; Shafer, John; Soldano, Louis; Steven Harris (E-mail); Taylor, Gina; Veatch, Stephen; Wadle, Susan; Watson, Kimberly; Wilkie, Kim
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Sun Devil Open Season Results --CONFIDENTIAL--

Overall, the results from Thursday's open season on our Sun Devil Project were very favorable (see below).  Contract terms ranged from two to sixteen years.

San Juan 	84% subscribed	at targeted transport rate
Phoenix		97% subscribed	at nearly targeted transport rate
Cal Border	77% subscribed	at 61% of targeted transport rate

We obviously have some work to do on the California piece but overall, the market interest supports our efforts to move forward with all due haste to the next level.  With that in mind, we'll begin working on the next steps below:

Next steps-
	 - Finalize Level A hydraulic study (9/7)
- Prepare Level B estimate  (9/30)
	- Schedule on-site ROW reviews (9/10)
- Schedule briefing session with FERC in September
- Issue press release on open season results (week of 9/3)
- Mobilize commercial teams to firm up contracts (week of 9/3)

For now, please regard this memo as highly confidential.  We appreciate everyone's support and hard effort thus far--  now the real fun begins!  Look for more info to follow soon and regularly scheduled project update meetings to begin in September.

Please call me with any questions / concerns at 853-5559.
Best Regards,
Kevin Hyatt


I received the PAA for Jean; it has been sent for processing, and the check will be available on November 30.

Thanks,

Fran Fagan
Sr. HR Rep
Enron Transportation Services
713.853.5219
fran.fagan@enron.com


Yes, Mary Solmonson from Energy Operations has volunteered to host a student
in the Job Shadowing program.  Mary may have one of her directors host the
student.  Please use Mary Solmonson as the primary contact for this program.
Her extension is 36079.  Thanks.

	Susan Skarness
	09/12/2000 02:45 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, C John
Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Junior Achievement - We Need You!

Following the initial message about Junior Achievement in March 2000, each of
you responded that your department was willing to participate in the Job
Shadowing program.  We want to ensure that you are still able to
participate.  When you have a moment, please advise.

Thank you.

Susan
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000
02:38 PM ---------------------------

Mark Frevert@ENRON
09/06/2000 03:14 PM
Sent by: Nicki Daw@ENRON
To: Paul Adair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Battaglia@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kent Densley/Corp/Enron@Enron, Timothy J
Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Douglas B Dunn/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ranabir
Dutt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Craig A Fox/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Greer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allan
Keel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Licato/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Jesus Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean
Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Parks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Rome/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Schaefer/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, C John
Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Vincent/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Junior Achievement - We Need You!

Our thanks to those of you who have already responded regarding the Junior
Achievement Job Shadowing program.  If you have already replied, it is not
necessary to do so again, however, there are still a number of you who have
not responded and we look forward to hearing from you.  Please review the
memo below and respond to Nicki Daw or Susan Skarness ASAP.

Your participation is greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

Mark Frevert & Cliff Baxter

________________________________________________________

	Cliff Baxter
	08/22/2000 11:07 AM

Subject: We Need You

Some of you were contacted earlier this year by Cliff Baxter, Enron's
representative on the Junior Achievement Board of Directors, regarding
participation in Enron's Junior Achievement program.  Since so many changes
have occurred within ENA since that time, we are renewing our request and
broadening it to reach more departments.

One of the programs that we wish to support through Junior Achievement is Job
Shadowing.  This program's objectives are to demonstrate why a sound
education, interpersonal skills, and a strong work ethic are needed to
succeed in the work place.  A successful Job Shadowing program requires your
department's commitment and participation.

The Job Shadowing program consists of the following:

 9:00 - 10:30 AM  Welcome, Company Overview, Video, and Tour
 10:30 - 12:00 N  Job Shadow Experience with Enron Employees and/or
Departments
 12:00 - 1:00 PM  Lunch for Students with Mentors and Closing Comments

Enron has agreed to accept 16 high school juniors and seniors on the second
Wednesday of each month from October 2000 through April 2001.  We need your
assistance in hosting students within your department during the 10:30 AM -
12:00 Noon period.   Students may be either paired up one-on-one with
employees or may remain in groups of 2-4.  Employees participating in Job
Shadowing will also be invited to join their students for a quick lunch and
closing comments.  If enough departments participate, it is possible that
each department may only be needed on a quarterly basis.

Although we have identified two individuals to provide the company overview
and tour, we are also accepting additional volunteers in this area.  Please
advise if anyone in your department is interested in assisting.

Please provide the following information to Nicki Daw or Susan Skarness by
August 30, 2000.

 Department Name:

 Job Shadowing Contact Name:

 Number of Students:

 Individual to Assist With Tours:

We appreciate your consideration and participation in promoting Junior
Achievement and Enron.

Cliff Baxter and Mark Frevert


Kam,

I was just talking to Barry about this and he is saying that the MTM for future deals should be dated the 2nd as well.  Basically, as of the date the contracts terminated, which most were that day (or monday the 3rd).  Sorry.  Let me know if you have any quesitons.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:29 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: West Gas Roll Out Plan

Thanks,

I will forward this to Casey Evans to work on the Power side.

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:26 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: West Gas Roll Out Plan

It would be total exposure, physical and financial, for gas, and then power separately, if you have access to that.  If not, forget power.  The date would be as of our bankruptcy, (Dec. 2nd?).  What did we owe them that we are not going to pay them?  What is our future exposure (MTM) as of now? (For a summer 2002 swap, for example.)  and what do they owe us if we haven't been paid?  We just need to be aware of how things ended with Enron so we can discuss it when we knock on their door as UBS.

Let me know what else you need and thanks for your help.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:20 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: West Gas Roll Out Plan

Kim,

Are these physical or financial, or a combination.  Do you know the termination dates?  If not, I will try to get them from the confirmations group.

Thanks
Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:03 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	FW: West Gas Roll Out Plan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:03 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	West Gas Roll Out Plan

Kim, as part of the roll out plans we will need a summary report of the close out values for these customers.  Can you coordinate with credit, including the utilization of an analyst ( if you can find one). to complete this list.

Cash means ( receivables, payables positions outstanding).
MTM ( the last MTM that we had with a company as we closed out).

The intent of compiling this information is to be able to position ourself for the appropriate conversation with this customer.... (if Enron owes them money, we should know that before we walk in the door).

Pls review and let's discuss....

BT  << File: westgascustlistrolloutplan.xls >>


Attached is a draft of procedures for the handling of TW PNR. At the bottom of the 1st page are a few issues that need a decision on how TW will handle each issue in the future. Please take a few minutes and review this draft and return your thoughts and comments to me. I would like to get your comments by the end of Wednesday January 31st.  Also, if you think I left anyone off the above distribution, please forward a copy to them.
If needed we can meet Thursday immediately following the Morning meeting(s) to finalize any outstanding issues. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks.


I will NOT give out my #.  I have not been, hope to go this fall.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cooper, Lance (LA)" <LACOOPER@dow.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cooper+2C+20Lance+20+28LA+29+22+20+3CLACOOPER+40dow+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 9:41 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Hey!

Have not gone yet, but planning to in October.  Jo Ellen and Bob are coming
down and we are planning to drive out for about a week.  Should be fun.
Charlotte and Bill are going to visit in September but we probably will not
go much further than San Antonio.  How about you?  Are you going or have you
been?

I did not understand your message about your phone number.  You will or will
not email it?

-----Original Message-----
From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [mailto:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 9:35 AM
To: LACOOPER@dow.com
Subject: RE: Hey!

Are you going to N Mexico this year?  I will not give my number out over
the net.  So email

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Cooper, Lance (LA)" <LACOOPER@dow.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cooper+2C+20Lance+20+28LA+29+22+20+3CLACOOPER+40dow+2E
com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:21 PM
   To:     Perlingiere, Debra
   Subject:  RE: Hey!

   You can give me your home phone too if you would like in case there is a
   good chance with short notice, OK?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com [mailto:Debra.Perlingiere@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:14 AM
   To: LACOOPER@dow.com
   Subject: RE: Hey!

   I am not playing the game this year,  thanks anyway.  Regarding the
   dogs,
   why don't you email someday that is good for you and we can meet.  Tiz
   cannot take the heat and I will leave him behind, but Gen desperately
   needs
   to get out.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Cooper, Lance (LA)" <LACOOPER@dow.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cooper+2C+20Lance+20+28LA+29+22+20+3CLACOOPER+40dow+2E
   com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:18 AM
      To:     Perlingiere, Debra
      Subject:  Hey!

      Do you need St. James Place and/or Illinois Avenue?  (McDonald's
      Monopoly)

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Mr. Lay,

Thank you in advance for taking time to meet with me.

I wanted to let you know in advance the topics I would like to discuss.

Now that I have been at EBS for a little over a year, I want to update you on
my
progress and experiences within EBS.

The other topic I would like to discuss with you is my pursuit of an MBA.
More
specifically I wanted to gather some of your insight as to pros and cons of
this
pursuit and how having an MBA with a technical background positions me within
Enron.

I would also like to talk to you about the outside business interest of mine
that I mentioned the night of the RISE School fundraiser.  This interest
fulfills my entrepreneurial desires and for that matter, I have been involved
with this company for the last five years and am one of three principles.

Best regards,

Chad Modad
Software Engineer
Enron Broadband Services
Tel: 713-669-4070
Cell: 713-516-2347


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:46 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/20/2000 01:54 PM
To:	Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Producer Pricing Meeting

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 01:50 PM ---------------------------

Saidia Matthews@ENRON
10/19/2000 11:16 AM
To:	Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melanie Facundo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Producer Pricing Meeting

The above has been requested to attend a Producer Pricing meeting on Oct. 30th at 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EB3533, if for any reason you're unable to attend please advise via email or call me at ext 5-3878.

Thank you,

Sy Matthews


Hi Sara

Can you shed any light on the issues below?

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 27/03/2001 16:56
---------------------------

Martin Rosell
18/03/2001 16:58
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Commodity Futures Modernization Act

Elisabeth:

I read an article in a law magazine about the captioned Act and it was, among
other things, stated therein that CFTC under the Act had been deprived of its
jurisdiction over swaps (other than those related to agricultural products)
made by eligible contracts participants.  Since the Oslo office trades
through ECTRIC, I wonder whether this new piece of legislation has an impact
on our standard reps relating to the "trade options exemption" and as to the
parties being "eligible swap participants" (are they still required)?  Is
there any internal memo yet prepared on the Act and its implications?

Martin


Note that this communication is confidential, covered by CA's settlement
rules.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/26/2000 11:14 AM -----

	"Lindh, Frank (Law)" <FRL3@pge.com>
	12/21/2000 07:50 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E Gas Accord II Settlement Proposal

Confidential Settlement Document
Per CPUC Rule 51

Gas Accord II Settlement Participants:

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II (GA II) Settlement Proposal.  We believe it
addresses many of the issues and concerns you have raised in the workshops.

As an overview, this proposal:

*   Maintains the basic Gas Accord structure in place today for the
period 2003 to 2007.
*
*   Offers end user transportation rates for 2003 lower for most
customers than rates in effect today.
*
*   Provides for vintaged Redwood path rates for core customers.
*
*   Offers a 7.5 cent/dth rate to large customers while minimizing rate
changes to other customers, minimizing the incentive for these customers to
seek to bypass local transmission charges and other CPUC-approved charges.
*
*   Adopts guidelines to improve reliability and help moderate prices in
gas commodity markets, and identifies the capital projects needed to meet
these guidelines over the course of the GA II period (2003-2007).
*
*   Provides a high degree of rate stability, with a 3.5% escalator to
capture both inflation and the cost of needed capital projects.  The
guaranteed rates will be adjustable only for significant changes in the cost
of capital or increased costs due to governmental requirements or
catastrophic events.
*
*   Preserves a rate differential between the Redwood and Baja paths,
although somewhat less than the current differential.
*
*   Proposes a two-stage open season for firm transportation services
beginning in 2003, with end users receiving a first option on available
capacity.
*
*   Maintains the core aggregation program with some adjustments.

PG&E also anticipates that the Core Procurement Incentive Mechanism (CPIM)
will be similar to today's mechanism, but will reflect the somewhat larger
capacity holdings needed to meet anticipated increases in core demand and to
meet a 1-day in 10-year cold weather event.

This also will serve as a reminder that an all-Party meeting is scheduled at
PG&E's headquarters in San Francisco on January 10 and 11, to discuss this
proposal and to respond to your questions.  We look forward to answering
your questions and receiving your feedback.

The attached documents include the GA II Settlement proposal, an Attachment
(a copy of PG&E's proposed Gas Rule 27), and a set of supporting workpapers.

Finally, please note that the Settlement document and the Attachment are in
"Word 2000" format.  We would be glad to provide the same documents in an
earlier version of Word, upon request by individual Parties.

We look forward to seeing you on January 10-11.  In the meantime, we extend
our best wishes for a safe and happy holiday season.

Frank Lindh               Ray Williams
(415) 973-2776            (415) 973-3634

 <<PG&E Gas Accord II Settlement Proposal 12-20-00.doc>>  <<Proposed Gas
Rule 27.doc>>  <<COS & Rates Workpapers for GA II 12-20-2000 Proposal.xls>>


That is too much work!!! However, my leg is feeling better, thank you. How
is your day going? I am @ the office. It is good to get out of the house.
Have a nice day. Love you-Dad

----- Original Message -----
From: <ebass@enron.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 9:38 AM
Subject: NOVA's Virtual Enigma

> web_browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)
>
> Greetings from NOVA Online.
>
> A friend of yours has encrypted a message using NOVA's Virtual Enigma. The
message, displayed below, is for your eyes only.
>
> To decipher the message, you will need to access the Virtual Enigma
(requires the Shockwave plugin), which is located on NOVA's Web site. You
will also need a special 'key' to decode the message.
>
> You will find the Virtual Enigma at the following url:
> http://www.pbs.org/nova/decoding/virtwave.html
>
> Message sent by:
> eric (ebass@enron.com)
>
> AAA
>
> Encrypted message:
>
> QTDHF AYTPE KHYYN WSJYE TBXNQ PJRRH GDVDX QHNNK QBKOD ZVQEU LTRMQ WDHUR
ACFGZ VJDPV UFIZA M
>
> NOVA Online
> http://www.pbs.org/nova
>
>


Have a happy Christmas to you all.
From us,
Steve,Charry,Haley & Wil


these files are password protected. what is this for? rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schultz, Cassandra
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Murphy, Ted; Port, David; Buy, Rick
Subject:	FW: Frevert Report - Published 4/30/01

FYI.

I will review weekly and highlight any items of interest in our weekly update meeting.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Mary Kay
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Mayeux, Cassandra; Brown, Sarah; Apollo, Beth; Schultz, Cassandra
Cc:	Killen, Faith
Subject:	Frevert Report - Published 4/30/01

 << File: Americas Trading.xls >>  << File: Assts_Invts.xls >>  << File: EarningsSumExpdetail.xls >>  << File: EEL Trading.xls >>  << File: EES Trading.xls >>  << File: EGM Trading.xls >>  << File: EIM Trading.xls >>  << File: ENW Trading.xls >>  << File: Expenses.xls >>  << File: Headcount.xls >>  << File: Origination.xls >>

Thanks
Mary Kay


Ron, attached is a revised version of the term sheet you prepared.  I deleted
the reference to the confidentiality obligations on the theory that
everything in that document is non-binding.  In presenting the document for
NMC, I would indicate something to them like "attached for disucssion
purposes is a proposed term sheet, please note that all the information
contained therein and all subsequent negotiations in connection with it are
to be regarded as confidential in accordance with that certain
confidentiality agreement entered into on April 12, 2001."  Also, please note
that the term sheet does not reflect Terri's comments below but does have
edits that Doug made.

Lastly, since your potential transaction involves a trading play, I have
asked Kay Mann.  If you meet with Doug and Terri et al, I would involve Kay
in the meetings.  Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 05:56 PM -----

	Terri Clynes@ECT
	04/25/2001 10:12 AM

		 To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: FW: term sheet template

Carlos,

I have reviewed the term sheet and have the following comments:

 1.  Under the Variable Charge section, the charge reflects a "sum".  I am
not sure if this is appropriate since only the "product" of the $/mwh   and
the number of MWs is listed to be summed.

 2.  The term sheet gives the buyer intraday flexibility.  I  am not sure if
Ron has had a chance to speak with anyone on the desk about   managing an
hourly call/change schedule, but I think these discussions need to take place
prior to discussions with the customer.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Terri Clynes
x37724
---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:26
AM ---------------------------
From: Doug Sewell/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/20/2001 10:19 AM
To: Terri Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: term sheet template

FYI(((((.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tapscott, Ron
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:57 AM
To: Sewell, Doug; Sole, Carlos
Subject: term sheet template

Doug,

see attached term sheet for NMC (Arpin, WI site).  Please provide comments
and changes as appropriate (plus add language for your insurance product in
the place holder).

Carlos,

Doug and I will provide you background.  I am not sure if you are the
appropriate Legal Support (please direct us to the appropriate person if you
are not).

This is a starting point and is fairly general (to facilitate discussions
with NMC).

Thanks, Ron.


I'm at work today and I assume we are going to the boat show tonight.  You just let me know.,


We're trying to get a demo setup - probably for lunch time one day this week.

 In the meantime, you can view the homepage at
http://test.entelligence.enron.com

Security will prevent you from going any further until you have been setup.
If you wish to gain access, please submit a request through erequest at
http://itc.corp.enron.com.  Currently, you can only request test access.
Production access should be added later this week.


Yes I plan on going to all if I can.  I will let you know.  Thanks and have a great day.  See you soon.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ballou, Chris" <Chris_Ballou@bmc.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 2:30 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE: Marcel Wanders

Hey John,

Yes and there's a Design Council event with him Tuesday night and a
reception at Sunset Settings on Thursday.  Will we see you at any or all of
the above?

Chris

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Chris Ballou and/or his relevant affiliates
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Chris
Ballou at chris_ballou@chrisballou.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or
an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable
contract between Chris Ballou (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the
basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. :-)
**********************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Griffith@enron.com [mailto:John.Griffith@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Chris_Ballou@bmc.com
Subject: Marcel Wanders

Hey Chris,

What is going on?  Are you going to go see the Marcel Wanders lecture at
the museum on Wednesday?  Just checking to see what is happening.  Hope all
is well.  Talk to you soon.

John

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


great job!!


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
02:49 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Andrea Ring                           12/01/2000 02:54 PM

To: Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Run off or Dance off?

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                11/28/2000 04:47 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Run off or Dance off?

This is the only answer -- specifically for us "sad" individuals.  Love ya -
MW

>
> (See attached file: danceoff.exe) <<danceoff.exe>>

 - danceoff.exe


Opps.  We do have to pay for the account.  I was afraid we were going to send
the big hunk of dough!

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 12:31 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Escrow Agreement

I thought we had to wire $12,000 (give or take a little) somewhere.

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 12:09 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Escrow Agreement

WHOA.  We are not wiring money, we are receiving money.  This should occur
either Jan 12 or 15.

Minor detail.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 12:06 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Escrow Agreement

Citibank just confirmed that they will also accept faxed signatures on the
Escrow Agreement.  Have you approved it yet?  If so, and we let accounting
know to wire the funds to Citibank before 2:00, we can get the $ in the
Escrow Account by tomorrow.  Otherwise, the funds will not get there until
Friday.

K-


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/26/2001 05:25 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-26-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 05:24 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/26/2001 05:05 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-26-01

Please see attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 02/10/2000
10:39 AM ---------------------------

troy_a_benoit@reliantenergy.com on 02/10/2000 10:23:49 AM
To: "Ami Chokshi" <Ami_Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: COPANO CHANGES

(See attached file: HPL-Feb.xls)

 - HPL-Feb.xls


Phil,

I don't have any specific recommendations, but I think PennWell Books has the
best selection of all books on the subject.  Thanks for your interest,

Fletch Sturm


Attached for your review are the finalized versions of the ISO Statement
Files Specification (v14.0), ISO Charge Matrix (v14.0 ) and overview
documents describing the key changes.  Draft versions of the same documents
were distributed in January for your review and comments.  Version 14.0 is
created due to changes in two settlement areas:
*	The existing Market Operations Charge (CT 523) will be replaced by
the new Ancillary Services and Real Time Energy Operations Charge (CT 524).
*	To facilitate automatic processing of Manual Line Item entries by
the SCs, ISO will impose more rigorous validations upon these entries when
they are created in the ISO Settlement System.

The above changes are scheduled to take effect on trade date 1/1/2002.  The
additional changes in the finalized versions are mostly minor corrections
and clarifications.

ISO has also added two new Manual Charge Types (CTs 691 and 692) in the
Charge Matrix:
CT 691 - Emissions Cost Payment; and
CT 692 - Start-Up Cost Payment.

These Charge Types were created as a result of the FERC's Order (dated
6/19/01) to reimburse generators for their Emissions and Start-Up related
costs incurred as a result of ISO dispatch.

Please send your questions and comments to Mr. C. P. Ng via email
(cng@caiso.com).  Thank you.

 <<Charge Matrix - Version 14.0 - 020102 - Final.xls>>  <<Statement File
Spec - Version 14.0 - 020402 - Final.doc>>  <<Overview - MLI
Validation.doc>>  <<Overview - 2002 GMC.doc>>

Client Relations Communications.0621
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


Stacey,

Per my voicemail, in reviewing the documentation provided by Marilyn she
noted that for three deals the trade date was before the deal entry date.
Please provide an explanation as to why the trade date is prior to the deal
entry date for the following deals:

      514141.2
      536771.2
      568025.1

Please provide the following:

   Forwards detail for NSTAR
   Liquidations report for NSTAR
   Query for longest dated deals

In addition, in reviewing the leg count of total deals by type provided  by
Casey, we noted that no transmission deals were included.  Do we have a
complete listing of deal types?

If you have any questions, please call me at X6-6269.

Thank you,

Jennifer
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


I think this will change a bit, but it gives you some history.


Attached are some random thoughts on distribution pricing including, rate
design, standby rates, exit fees, pricing flexibility.

Roger


Howdy...How long has it been?  When are we going out?  How's everything up
there?


Attached are the following documents regarding Enron Metals North America Voluntary Separation:

BU Head's Talking Points to the Business

Voluntary Separation Payment Calculation

Application for Voluntary Separation

Enron Metal Voluntary Separation Program Summary Description

If you have any questions, please contact me at 713-345-4674.


Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 08:36 AM -----

	TeiglandL@sullcrom.com
	03/15/2001 11:57 PM

		 To: Janice.R.Moore@enron.com, Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc: lpeddic@alleghenyenergy.com, YYaish@exchange.ml.com,
GilbergD@sullcrom.com, Ormec@sullcrom.com
		 Subject: Re-revised Allegheny Side Letter for ISDA

Sara/Janice, thanks for your comments.  I have reflected them in the attached
draft, marked to show your changes.  The governing law provision is a
formulation that we have used at S&C to accomplish the purpose of giving
effect to NY-GOL 5-1401 and should achieve the purpose of the language you
added to the power master amendment; I was planning to conform the latter to
the language used here unless you have an objection.

Allegheny has not yet reviewed this draft so it remains subject to their
comment.  I also need Yair to confirm that he is happy with the new Part 6 -
Commodity Definitions section (Yair, this is attached as Exhibit "C" to the
attached document).

Let me know if you have any further questions or comments.  Thanks!

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Allegheny  ENRON ISDA SIDE LETTER(vRED).DOC


Vince and Jeff,

Who should we list as a judge?  I could list myself to act as the point of
contact and I'll also give my comments on the plans, but I think Enron's
"judge" should be someone in the capacity of evaluating Enron's early stage
ventures.

Please let me know as soon as possible.

Thanks!

--Christie.
----- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 03/15/2001 07:40 AM -----

	"Andrew Gaffney" <gaffneya@wharton.upenn.edu>
	03/08/2001 08:47 AM

		 To: <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>
		 cc: "Stamer, Anne" <stamer@wharton.upenn.edu>
		 Subject: Wharton Business Plan Competition

Dear Ms. Patrick,
?
Anne Stamer asked me to contact you  regarding?Enron providing a judge for
Phase III of the Business Plan  Competition.? Phase III judges are generally
Partner-level individuals at  venture capital firms,?Managing Directors from
investment banks, or other  senior individuals?who have extensive experience
assessing and working with  early stage ventures.? A Phase III judge will
receive five business plans,  with the entire judging process requiring 4-5
hours during the weeks of April 2  and April 9.? I am attaching a document
that describes the competition and  judging procedures for Phase III in more
detail.? We are looking to  finalize the list of Phase III judges by March
23, so if you could please  forward either Anne or I the name of the
appropriate individual, we can contact  them directly with more details.?
Please let me know if you have further  questions and we appreciate your
support of the Competition.
?
Sincerely,
?
Andrew  Gaffney
 - Phase III Judge Info 00-01.doc


gngr
713-853-7751


Rajesh,

I left a message with Dan Rogers regarding the availability of a COU in draft form. I have a hard copy of a COU that I believe came from OLNG. I can fax it to you tomorrow. Is your fax still 91-22-2881793?

Regards,

Paul


Thank you very much for the nice gift (and, of course, the $1).   I appreciate you girls putting up with me and doing a great job for the whole floor.

Thanks again.


Casey has a list of all the East Power curves.   Frank - Stop re-inventing the wheel.   This stuff has been done already.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 1:41 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Zufferli, John; Lavorato, John
Cc:	White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Gorny, Vladimir; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Curves and Correlations

I have to clean up clustering and curve mappings from Estate to NETCO.  Last correlation update was Nov. 29th and I'm assuming we may have some issues.  The curves we are rolling into NETCO need to be highly accurate for the last 60 days to ensure variance covariance matrix is appropriate.  Please provide me list of curves we are using in NETCO.  Identify which curves should be primary and which curves can be secondary.  Additionally, please identify if there are any regional constraints that need to be "locked in" between primary and secondary curves.  I will then re-run correlations so we can properly understand diversification benefit across wholesale as it relates to proposed VAR limit structures.

Thanks,
Frank


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:52 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	04/04/2001 11:41 AM

		 To: <mmilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Wed, 04 Apr
2001 08:34:07 -0500 -----
To:	"Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll"
<rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds
Tuesday April 3, 6:15 pm Eastern Time
Edison gets more time; Calif. may sell $14 bln bonds
(UPDATE: Recasts, adds details throughout, byline)

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, April 3 (Reuters) - Edison International (NYSE:EIX - news), parent
of troubled utility Southern California Edison, said on Tuesday bankers are
giving it and the utility more time to cure their defaults on three credit
lines.

The announcement came after the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC),
which sets rates, also on Tuesday voted to authorize the state's Department
of Water Resources to sell between $12 billion and $14 billion of bonds to
finance power purchases, and examine the financial links between the
utilities and their parents.

The 30-day extension from Edison's banks means the banks will ``forbear,'' or
not act upon, the credit line defaults.

``That will take us out to basically around April 14,'' said Ted Craver,
chief financial officer of Edison International, during an investor
conference call. The prior forbearance, the banks' second, had expired March
13.

The California power crisis has led to periodic blackouts and left SoCal
Edison, which owes more than $5.4 billion for post power costs, and the
state's largest utility Pacific Gas & Electric Co., which owes about $8.9
billion, on the brink of bankruptcy. A rate freeze imposed under the state's
1996 utility deregulation law has prevented them from passing on their
soaring wholesale power costs to consumers.

Though the PUC awarded the utilities a roughly 40 percent rate hike last
week, allowing them to collect $4.8 billion more each year, analysts and the
utilities said the hike effectively does nothing to let the utilities to
recoup their prior costs.

``At best the utility is standing still (in that) it hasn't improved its cash
flow or its cash position,'' said Craver. ``At worst, it is going backwards.
That's our basic conclusion on the numbers and the mechanisms as we
understand them.''

San Francisco-based PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG - news), parent of Pacific G&E, has
said it expects to take a $4.1 billion charge for unrecouped electricity
costs, while Rosemead, Calif.-based Edison has said it may take a
``substantial'' charge that may total as much as $2.7 billion.

The California Independent System Operator, which runs most of the state's
power grid, early on Tuesday called another Stage Two emergency alert because
of supply problems. Such alerts are declared when power reserves fall to
within 5 percent of peak demand. The alert was later lifted.

Edison shares closed Tuesday on the New York Stock Exchange at $12.82, up 27
cents, or 2.2 percent. PG&E shares closed on the Big Board at $11.53, down 22
cents, or 1.9 percent.

Craver also said in the conference call that SoCal Edison has rolled over
364-day and 5-year Libor-based credit facilities that recently matured for a
respective 30 and 90 days, and that Edison rolled over one of its own
facilities for 45 days.

He concluded the call by expressing relief that creditors have not yet thrown
the utility into bankruptcy, which analysts have said could already have
happened by now had the PUC not granted the rate hike.

``I'm somewhat amazed about how disciplined everybody has been,'' he said.
``We're seeking protection from misguided regulatory decisions, and the
solution is really in that same venue, in the regulatory and political and
legislative context.''


CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
DOMESTIC U.S.
Wednesday, June 6, 2001
****************************************

YOU'RE TAKING THE FLIGHTS, SO EARN THE MILES

Don't miss out on any more miles. Become a OnePass member
and start earning miles towards free travel every time you fly.
Register instantly for your OnePass number at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZk0Az

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
2. Featured Fares Sample Destinations
3. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
4. National Car Rental Offers
5. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts,
   Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels
6. Hilton Hotel Offers

****************************************
This week's specials are good for the following markets departing Saturday,
June 9 and returning on either Monday, June 11 or Tuesday, June 12, 2001.
Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

****************************************
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

Purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZl0A1
You can also purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials for an additional cost of $20
per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

********************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
********************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$139 - Albany, NY
$159 - Buffalo, NY
$159 - Dayton, OH
$159 - Grand Rapids, MI
$149 - Hartford, CT
$119 - Indianapolis, IN
$129 - Milwaukee, WI
$99  - Nashville, TN

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:
$139 - Abilene, TX
$109 - Baton Rouge, LA
$149 - Boston, MA
$89  - Corpus Christi, TX
$179 - El Paso, TX
$99  - New Orleans, LA
$229 - Tucson, AZ

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$309 - Austin, TX
$169 - Columbia, SC
$179 - Nashville, TN
$129 - New Orleans, LA
$309 - Orange County/Santa Ana, CA
$129 - Raleigh Durham, NC
$149 - Richmond, VA

********************************
2. FEATURED FARES SAMPLE DESTINATION

Choose your fare, find your flight. Or, quickly sift through all our great
featured fares by choosing a destination or origin. Be spontaneous. Get out
of town. Current Featured Fares destinations include:

New York, Baltimore, Buffalo, Houston,
Cleveland, Phoenix, and many more.

Note: Featured Fares change often. To see a regularly-updated online list
and purchase our Featured Fares, visit the website at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZm0A2

(Capacity controls and other restrictions apply)

********************************
3. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, June 9, 2001 with returns Monday, June 11, 2001 or Tuesday, June 12,
2001.
-------------------------------
$20 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$26 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$18 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)
$26 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$27 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$46 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$20 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$18 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$26 a day in:  New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$18 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)
$20 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)
$26 a day in:  Tucson, AZ (TUS)

To receive special Continental CO.O.L. discounted rates, simply make advance
reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your
reservation online at:

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0bf10A2
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo
offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0bf20A3

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
4. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, June 9, 2001 with returns Monday, June 11, 2001 or Tuesday, June 12,
2001.
------------------------------------------
$23 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$29 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$21 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)
$29 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$30 a day in:  Baton Rouge, LA (BTR)
$27 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$21 a day in:  Columbia, SC (CAE)
$23 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$21 a day in:  Dayton, OH (DAY)
$19 a day in:  El Paso, TX (ELP)
$32 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$23 a day in:  Grand Rapids, MI (GRR)
$21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$24 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$29 a day in:  New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$21 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)
$23 a day in:  Richmond, VA (RIC)
$23 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)

To receive your special Continental Airlines CO.O.L. Travel Specials discounted
rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product
Code COOLUS.  To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT
(1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0D7m0Ak
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract
ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0DwD0A8

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
5. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND
RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS
& RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS,
THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for
this weekend June 8- June 12, 2001.
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0D7n0Al

--------------------------------------
California - Costa Mesa - The Westin South Coast Plaza - $88.00
California - Ontario - Sheraton Ontario Airport Hotel - $51.00

Connecticut - Danbury - Sheraton Danbury Hotel - $89.00
Connecticut - Stamford - The Westin Stamford - $71.00
Connecticut - Stamford - Sheraton Stamford Hotel - $77.00

Indiana - Indianapolis - The Westin Indianapolis - $87.00
Indiana - Indianapolis - Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel & Suites - $64.00

Louisiana - Baton Rouge - Sheraton Baton Rouge Convention Center Hotel - $77.00
Louisiana - New Orleans - W New Orleans - $159.00

Massachusetts - Boston - Sheraton Boston Hotel - $189.00
Massachusetts - Braintree - Sheraton Braintree Hotel - $119.00
Massachusetts - Burlington - Four Points by Sheraton Burlington - $77.00
Massachusetts - Framingham - Sheraton Framingham Hotel - $97.00
Massachusetts - Needham - Sheraton Needham Hotel - $107.00
Massachusetts - Newton - Sheraton Newton Hotel - $109.00
Massachusetts - Wakefield - Sheraton Colonial Hotel and Golf Club Boston -
$90.00
Massachusetts - Waltham - The Westin Waltham-Boston - $90.00
Massachusetts - Waltham - Four Points by Sheraton Waltham - $75.00

New Hampshire - Manchester - Four Points by Sheraton Manchester - $79.00
New Hampshire - Nashua - Sheraton Nashua Hotel - $70.00

New Jersey - Edison - Sheraton Edison Hotel Raritan Center - $75.00
New Jersey - Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany Hotel - $70.00
New Jersey - Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Piscataway - $65.00
New Jersey - Woodbridge - Sheraton at Woodbridge Place Hotel - $71.00

New York - Jamaica - Sheraton JFK Airport Hotel - $110.00
New York - New York - Essex House - A Westin Hotel - $228.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton Russell Hotel - $179.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton Manhattan Hotel - $169.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers - $169.00
New York - Niagara Falls - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - $84.00

North Carolina - Chapel Hill - Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel - $77.00
North Carolina - Durham - Sheraton Imperial Hotel and Convention Center - $55.00

Ohio - Cincinnati - The Westin Cincinnati - $90.00
Ohio - Independence - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland South - $65.00

Rhode Island - Warwick - Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel - $79.00

Tennessee - Nashville - Sheraton Music City - $59.00

Texas - Houston - The Westin Galleria Houston - $64.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton North Houston at George Bush Intercontinental -
$64.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton Houston Brookhollow Hotel - $45.00
Texas - Houston - The Westin Oaks - $70.00

Wisconsin - Brookfield - Sheraton Milwaukee Brookfield Hotel - $65.00

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
6. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS ON HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available June 9-11, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Austin, TX - Hilton Austin North - $99
Austin, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites Austin - $139

Boston, MA - Hilton Boston Logan Airport - - $179
Boston, MA - Doubletree Guest Suites Boston - $169
Boston, MA - Doubletree Hotel Boston-Downtown - $149

Cleveland, OH - Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport. - $89
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Cleveland East/Beachwood, Beachwood, OH. - $109

Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Southwest - $109
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Plaza - $79/Night, 6/9-10

Indianapolis, IN - Doubletree Guest Suites Indianapolis/Carmel - $89

Newark, NJ - Hilton Rye Town, Rye Brook, NY. - $129/Night, 6/9-10
Newark, NJ - Hilton New York, New York, NY.- $179

New Orleans, LA - Hilton Garden Inn New Orleans Downtown - $69
New Orleans, LA - Doubletree Hotel New Orleans-Lakeside, Metairie, LA. -
$69/Night, 6/9-10

Orange County, CA - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San Pedro, CA. - $139
Orange County, CA - Hilton Long Beach, Long Beach, CA. - $79
Orange County, CA - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport, Irvine, CA. - $169

Raleigh, NC - Hilton North Raleigh - $119

Tucson, AZ - Doubletree Guest Suites Tucson - $59

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0jWG0AI

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to
availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel.
Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these
rates.

****************************************
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge. Passenger Facility Charges, up to $12
depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise
tax, as applicable, is not included. Applicable International and or Canadian
taxes and fees up to $88, varying by destination, are not included and may vary
slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a
complete listing of rules please visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZn0A3

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other
governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel,
additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver
Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age,
driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25.
Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some
on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent
at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a
5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must
be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or
higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be
combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be
returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible
for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and
Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other
special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject
to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required.
Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based on
single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional
Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate quoted.
Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon with
a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming
weekend only. Offer available only by making reservations via the internet. A
limited number of rooms may be available at these rates.

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0FG20A4

---------------------------------------
This E-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly
prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO: mailto:eservice@coair.com

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find CO.O.L. Travel Specials a valuable source of information.
However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us
know by visiting the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZo0A4

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the CO.O.L. Travel Specials page on our web site at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760B21hg0Ow0nZp0A5


Dear Vince,
I am truly grateful. That would be excellent.
Many thanks,
Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: eprmconf@asiarisk.com.hk <eprmconf@asiarisk.com.hk>
Cc: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; vkaminski@aol.com
<vkaminski@aol.com>
Date: 02 March 2000 14:56
Subject: Re: Fwd: Australian Energy 2000

>
>
>Joel,
>
>I shall be glad to take all the remaining sections.
>
>I have spoken on this subject several times so it will
>relatively easy to prepare it.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>VKaminski@aol.com on 02/29/2000 09:27:19 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Fwd: Australian Energy 2000
>
>
>
>
>Return-Path: <eprmconf@asiarisk.com.hk>
>Received: from  rly-yd01.mx.aol.com (rly-yd01.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.1])
by
>air-yd03.mail.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Feb 2000
:30:22   -0500
>Received: from  sr01.imsbiz.com (sr01.imsbiz.com [206.161.62.5]) by
>rly-yd01.mx.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Feb 2000
9:51     -0500
>Received: from joel ([210.176.232.92])   by sr01.imsbiz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8)
with
>SMTP id KAA00361    for <VKaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:29:44 +0800
>Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000301103241.007b6a10@pop.asiarisk.com.hk>
>X-Sender: eprmconf@pop.asiarisk.com.hk
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
>Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:32:41 +0800
>To: VKaminski@aol.com
>From: Joel Hanley <eprmconf@asiarisk.com.hk>
>Subject: Re: Australian Energy 2000
>In-Reply-To: <48.23f7598.25edd39e@aol.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=====================_951849161==_"
>
>Dear Vince,
>I am delighted to be working with you at last. I can confirm the lessons
>learned session, and I shall leave it up to you to consider the content.
>The session will last one hour, including Q&A. The VaR sessions I was
>hoping you would address are actually part of the post conference seminar
>and I realise that I did not send you the schedule for that. Please accept
>my apologies. I have attached the seminar outline for you information.
>Glenn Labhart of Dynegy will take the first and last sessions. Is there any
>chance you could do the others? I realise that this is a lot but it would
>be great if you could consider it. Please let me know when you can.
>Thanks again for agreeing to come all that way. I am sure it will be a
>worthwhile trip.
>Best regards,
>Joel.
>
>
>At 08:59 PM 2/29/00 EST, you wrote:
>>Dear Joel:
>>
>>Thanks for the invitation to speak at Australian Energy 2000. I shall be
>glad
>>to attend and speak on the topics you mentioned in your message and in our
>>telephone conversation. The first topic will be "Learning from US
>experience:
>>Lessons to be
>>learned from the restructuring North American markets"; the second topic
>will
>>be "Value-at-Risk" (please, feel free to make this title more specific).
>>
>>I look forward to meeting you in Australia in July.
>>
>>Vince
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>PS. As of Friday 3rd March, I shall be back in my London office where my
>email address is hanley@risk.co.uk and my number is +44 207 484 9885.
>
>(See attached file: varsem1.doc)
>
>
>