This deal is part of a sleeve - we bought Powerex at 145.00 and sold EES at
145.05. This is standard procedure for these kinds of deals, said the guys at
the Long Term Northwest desk. They're positive that the deal should include a
5-cent charge on the sale side; and Mike Driscoll said if EES still disputes
this, they can call him to verify.

Please let me know if this deal continues to be a problem.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/03/2001 10:55 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: EESI #487723

Thanks!
The holidays for me were really nice.  All my brothers were home so they kept
me pretty busy.  But it doesn't sound like it compares with yours!  Happy New
Year!
On another, not so exciting, note, I have another question about the EESI
deal #481619.  I just spoke with Judy and they say that the price is supposed
to be $145.00 not $145.05.  Can you check on that one?  It's the only one
still hanging out there from the mess before the holidays.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                01/03/2001 12:34 PM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EESI #487723

Oops - I guess the deal can't be killed because it contains liquidated
strips. I've changed the confirm status to no confirm, and the energy to
CAISO - so even though the deal has no volume or price, its other details are
correct.

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
01/03/2001 06:51 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EESI #487723

Hi Kate,
This deal needs to be changed to no confirm (it's a West daily deal).  Also,
it has an NP-15 delivery point with firm energy.
Thanks!
Kim


Actually, can we get together at 4:30 instead?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Kiani-Aslani, John
Subject:	RE: Crestone Transaction

How about 2 this afternoon.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kiani-Aslani, John
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Miles, Andrew
Subject:	Crestone Transaction

Gerald,

Do you have about 30 minutes to meet with Andrew and I to discuss a CA for our Crestone transaction?

Thanks,

JK


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
09:27 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/13/2001 09:31 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--4/13/01


Please see the attached Management Report for June 21, 2000:

Total  Today Year To Date Life To Date

Number of Transactions  2,038 159,097 164,098
Gross Notional Value $  843,179,637 74,711,023,498 75,925,710,072

Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)  4,436,931,199 4,532,682,691

New Counterparties transacting today  0
Counterparties having transacted to date  371

Also attached is the Public Domain Report, containing information which is
intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron:

Total Life to Date Transactions   > 164,000, which is > 52 % of Enron,s
current transactions for the month
Average Daily Transactions    > 1,900
Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $74 billion
Average Daily Notional Value    = Approximately $1 billion, which is 45% of
Enron,s Notional Volume
Number of Products Offered Each Day  = Approximately 820


Great!  Let me know how it goes.  Mark


does ENRON have a position?

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Schultz, Don
Sent:?? Wednesday, August 30, 2000 8:31 AM
To:???? Morse, David E.; Logan, Scott; Fest, Anthony D.; Kinser, Alannah;
Smith, Don; Milano, Gaetano R.; Morse, Jay; Thompson, Thomas W.; Kinosian,
Robert; Hallman, Jeanne; Cauchois, Scott; Maack, Lynn A.; Mowrey, Terry R.;
McNamara, Michael D.

Cc:???? Long, Douglas M.; Premo, Anne W.; Fitch, Julie; Mitchell-Jackson,
Jennifer; Walsh, Natalie; Rosauer, Michael; Wagoner, Donna L.; Ikl,, Judith
C.; Hendry, James

Subject:??????? current events

First attachment: Wall Street gets it.?
Second attachment: Calif public purpose policy gridlock

 <<market response fuel cells Ing Rand DJN 8_00.doc>>  <<Public purpose
program leg  8_00.doc>>

 - market response fuel cells Ing Rand DJN 8_00.doc
 - Public purpose program leg  8_00.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:27 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           07/07/2000 01:53 PM

To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Glencore Fuel Supply Agreement

please call me on Monday morning to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000 01:53 PM
---------------------------

Diana Parker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/07/2000 01:50 PM
To: Ermes Melinchon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph M Galan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Doug Leach@ECT
Subject: Glencore Fuel Supply Agreement

Doug Leach advised that he spoke with Sergio at Glencore yesterday, and
Glencore is satisfied with the June 5 draft (copy attached) of the FSA, with
the exception of 2 matters:
1.  He wants the LIBOR rate on late payments in Section 9.3 to be fixed on a
specific day (e.g., the due date for the payment)
2.  He wants the ENE payment guarantee referenced in Section 9.5 to be
increased to $7MM due to increased fuel prices.
Doug is running these two points by Tom Moran on Monday, but doesn't believe
they will be a problem (with respect to ENE furnishing the guarantee).

I intend to courier execution copies of the FSA to Glencore on Monday, after
we get the confirmation from Tom Moran, unless any of you notify me of a
problem with
these changes.
Regards,
Diana


Gareth:  Thanks for that note.  Have a happy new year!    Mark Haedicke


Power Indices - IntercontentalExchange

                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Friday, December  21, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Thursday, December  20, 2001)
Click here to access index history


Reddy,

Thanks for your message. It would be quite difficult to work
with you on telecommuting basis, given the type of
work we do and the extent of integration of our team with the rest of the
company.

I shall be glad to explore with you other forms of
cooperation Please, call me at 713 853 3848.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chandrasekhar Gukhal  [mailto:cgukhal@hotmail.com]
Sent:	Friday, May 04, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	vince.j.kaminski
Subject:	query

Dear Dr. Kaminski:

I am interested in working on a part-time, telecommuting basis
(roughly the equivalent of 1 to 2 days a week) for about a year or
two. I can visit as necessary. I am attaching a brief resume.

Is this something that might be of interest to you? Should you have no
opportunities, can you suggest other groups? I look forward
to hearing from you.

Regards
Reddy

Chandrasekhar R. Gukhal
Assistant Professor of Finance
S.C.Johnson Graduate School of Management
Cornell University
Ithaca NY 14853
Ph: (607)255-0053
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - aaPart-vita.pdf << File: aaPart-vita.pdf >>


enjoy boyz!


I will be out of the office on Friday.  Monday is President's Day.  Shari or
Carol may be available on Friday.  Sara

	From:  Ed Quinn                           02/15/2000 05:15 PM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: General Mills - Conference Call - 9:30a.m. Friday

Are you two available for a conference call with General Mills Friday morning
at 9:30a.m to discuss ISDA schedule/credit annex??

I will be traveling Friday and may not be able to call in - no big loss!!!

Please let me know if this time will work so I can confirm with General Mills.

Ed Quinn


To review the congressional map for Texas go to www.tlc.state.tx.us.  Click on redistricting service and then click on the map from the October 14th Order.

MR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Robinson, Marchris
Subject:	Nice Visit with Your Brother

Nice to meet your brother.  Do you have a map of the 25th?

Jim


Per our discussion, here is Annex II!

Have a great weekend!

Jorge


A few thoughts before the NG meeting --

1.	Maybe we should (as a team) call Transelect (Paul Buckman) before our NG meeting.  You may remember that Transelect sent an initial letter into Skilling to try and solicit our support for stopping the NG application to be managing member of the ARTO.  I think that it would be good to call Buckman and ask if he has a better idea than NG.  We are right now stuck between two very bad answers - let AEP and FE construct a managing member or have NG.  Maybe Transelect has a better solution.

2.	Chief Issues with NG --
a.	are they "really" independent?  having a short position in NY and owning generation in NE effectively makes NG into a "market participant" - I think that Enron should make as a hold firm position that to operate an RTO there can be no agreement with anything less than almost perfect independence.
b.	who do they feel the customer is?  maybe we want to get Paul Dawson's take on their business model from the UK.  it is critical that the new RTO operators across the country view traders/marketers and generators as their key customers.  what form of regulation for cost recovery of their operating expenses do they want - pass thru, PBR, etc.?
c.	who writes the tariff?  I would make a strong argument that the problem with most of the RTO work to date has been that FERC has allowed the current incumbents to first write a bad tariff and then assign the provision of service under that tariff to someone who has very little (if any) control over future changes.  the RTO operator must be free to make changes to the tariff with only two constraints - (1) must not restrict the ability to pay facility revenue reqts and (2) must not damage the assets.
d.	do they intend to build/own transmission and how does this impact the energy markets?  will their planning and construction processes impact any long term positions that EPMI may take in the energy market.  how do they manage to allow other merchant transmission into the business?
e.	how do they intend to provide balancing energy?  the flip side of our fight on congestion management involves the pricing of energy imbalances.  what is NG intending to do on this issue?  does NG believe that multiple control areas makes sense for a single RTO?  does NG support unbalanced/uncovered schedules day-ahead?

Also, just to let people know, Kerry Stroup will also be working on the Midwest RTO efforts going forward.  Please keep him included on the e-mails.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allegretti, Daniel
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:30 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Roan, Michael
Subject:	Meeting with N. Grid

Meeting confirmed with National Grid for 10:00 am, Tuesday, August 13, 2001 at National Grid's office, 633 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C.

Attendees from Grid will include some or all of the following people:

Nick Windsor (UK)
Phillip Johnson (UK)
Tony Hill (Business Dev)
Peter Flynn (US Transmission)
Masheed Rosenquist (US Transmission)
Paul Halas (US Transmission)


no problem

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Jan
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:20 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Days Off

Tracy:

I keep forgetting to mention that my parents and other family members are coming from Kansas to visit us the middle of this month.
I need to take the following days off:

Friday, October 19 - My Friday off for 9-8-1
Monday, October 22 - Vacation

Thanks!

Jan


Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011316.txt


eProcurement

As previously announced, Corporate and Enron Wholesale Services will use
eProcurement to create and approve purchase requests for IT hardware and
office supplies beginning July 2.

The purpose of this e-mail is to share the available eProcurement learning
options.  You decide what option(s) works best for you.

* Houston eProcurement System Demonstrations (1.5 hr overview) Registration
Now Open!
Register at <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>

* Houston eProcurement Requestor Instructor-Led Classes (3 hr hands-on)
Registration Now Open!
Register at <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>

* NEW! Online, Interactive eProcurement Courses Available June 18!
Access Requestor and Approver courses from <http://iscedcenter.enron.com>

* Electronic Quick Reference Cards and Step-by-Step Documentation Available
June 18!
Access from <
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=205>

Over the next three weeks, you will receive additional information to help
you transition to the new system:
*  How iBuyit eProcurement will impact your purchase activities
*  Where to get help
*  Logon information and quick reference cards

Questions?
For general information about iBuyit, send an e-mail to <<
mailto:ibuyit@enron.com>>.


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 09:00 and 12:00 - 23:00 in the May 3,
2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to
verify
prices:

PJM: 00:00, 18:00, 22:00
OH:  00:00, 18:00, 22:00
HQ:  00:00, 09:00, 18:00, 22:00
NE:  00:00 - 12:00, 18:00 - 20:00, 22:00 - 23:00

Prices in the May 4, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be found
at
the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 09:35 AM -----

	Susan Bailey
	05/16/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Agreement

Sara,

Steve Morus @ Puget Sound asked that I forward the attached on to you for
review and comment.

Advise if I may of assistance.

Susan

----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 08:15 AM -----

	"Morus, Steve" <smorus@puget.com>
	05/15/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: "'Bailey, Susan (Enron North Am)'" <susan.bailey@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Agreement

Susan,
Per our phone discussion, please forward the attached agreement (in two
files) to Sara Shackleton.  As I've previously discussed with Sara, the
executables have been routed upstairs for signature by our executives.  I
will mail them to you as soon as they are signed.  In the meantime, the
attached files are intended to give you all a jump on your review.  Please
call if you have any questions.  I can be reached at 425 462-3688, or on my
pager at 888 731-9937.
Thanks,
-Steve Morus

 <<Master Agmt for Swap Transactions.DOC>>  <<Annex A for Swaps Merged
version.doc>>

 - Master Agmt for Swap Transactions.DOC
 - Annex A for Swaps Merged version.doc


As you may be aware, Enron Corp. is a member of the Official Unsecured
Creditors' Committee appointed in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
bankruptcy case. Michael Tribolet with the Risk Assessment and Control Group
is Enron's designated representative on the committee and he is being
assisted by Lisa Mellencamp in the Enron North America Corp. legal group.
Please be advised that they will be restricted from disclosing certain of the
information that they receive.

Attached are Ethical Wall Procedures regarding confidential information that
Enron may receive as a member of the committee. It is important that you read
the procedures promptly, print the Employee Certification attached and sign
and return the Employee Certification to the Compliance Department as
directed.


Sara,  great to hear from you.  The entity requiring the brokerage account is
Enron Energy Services, Limited, which is a UK entity.  This company is buying
100% of the shares of a UK engineering firm (called Torpy) in order to use in
its facilities management business here.  The purchase price for Torpy is $4
million, $1 million of which is payable in Enron Corp. stock.  For tax
reasons this Enron stock needs to be purchased in the market rather than
using treasury shares.  Thanks for the tip on account signatories.  Please
let me know what else I need to do  Thanks again.

Sara Shackleton
11/10/99 16:32
To: Mary Nell Browning/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Marie Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lori Pinder/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Brokerage Account for EES affiliate

Hello there!  Hope all is well.  Will you be at the legal conference later
this month?

Would you please provide us with information identifying the specific entity
requiring the brokerage account and a brief description of the transaction
for which the account is required.  Also, for purposes of your unanimous
consent or resolution,  you should note that either of Ted Murphy or Rick Buy
should be one of the two signatories required for opening the account.  Let
me know if you have any questions.  Sara


Barry,
Here you go. Let me know if you need anything else!
Thanks,
Nicole

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:46 AM
To:	Laporte, Nicole
Subject:	RE: Alberta Fundamentals

Looks good.. I will review. Is there a chart on the cumulative Alberta Field receipt levels.... i.e. 13.2 bcf/day?

Thanks,

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Laporte, Nicole
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:04 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	Alberta Fundamentals

Barry,
Please find attached a few slides detailing WCSB fundamentals. Please let me know if you want to see the actual data behind the graphs or if you require any more information.
Regards,
Nicole
 << File: alberta fundamentals_august 21.ppt >>


you just need it all the time don't you.  don't you like me for me?  or am i just a boy toy to you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:19 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

you're no fun.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:17 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i have stronger will than you think. house of pies here i come.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 9:08 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   i am sure i could have persuaded you to give me some action.  why is
   enron
   blowing up?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:53 AM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i didn't want you to go.  i was just going to sleep anyway.  i was too
   tired to give you any action.  enron is blowing up.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:43 AM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      stop trying to make me feel bad, it's not working,  i left b/c you
      wanted me
      to leave.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:27 AM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      can't believe you left last night.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:50 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         nice sarcasm.  that's fine, i don't want to see you either, i just
      need
         to
         make a cd.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:42 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         i can't wait

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:29 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            i'll just come over betw. 7:30 and 8 then.  remember, you're
      supposed
         to
            be
            getting excited.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:55 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            7:30 or 8.  i don't care when.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 3:14 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               you never told me when to come over.  so what time?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:33 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               ok sweet baby

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:29 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  yeah, just charge whatever you need to.  i'll give you
   one
      of
         my
               credit
                  cards for you to use whenever you want to also.  i'll
   have
      to
            think
                  about
                  what i want you to do.  i'll let you know.

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:27 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  can i just charge the spa to your account?  so now that i
   am
         your
            boy
                  toy
                  what do you want me to do?

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:21 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     alright, just called and you're all set up at the
      houstonian
         so
               you
                  can
                     go
                     out there whenever you want to.   just let me know if
         there's
                  anything
                     else
                     i can get for you.

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:57 AM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     yeah.  just go ahead and do that.  how about the
      houstonian?
               youre
                  the
                     best.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON
                        Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:43 AM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        no problem.  instead of a golf allowance though, i
      think
            i'll
               just
                     get
                        you a
                        membership somewhere.  wouldn't that be better?
   just
      let
         me
               know
                  so
                     i
                        can
                        arrange it.

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:25 AM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        sweet.  i need a golf allowance then.   i can drink
      beer
            every
                  night
                     and
                        golf all day while you work.  that would be so
   sweet
      of
         you.
            i
                  cant
                        wait
                        to do that.

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON
                           Sent:   Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:05 AM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           you don't need to work at denny's.  you know, i
      make a
            lot
               of
                     money,
                           more
                           than i can spend, so there's really no reason
   why
      you
            can't
                  just
                     live
                           off of
                           my salary for a while.  shouldn't be a problem,
   i
         usually
               just
                     give
                        half
                           of
                           it away to charity anyway.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Lenhart, Matthew
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                           Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 10:55 AM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject:

                           looks like i am going to work at denny's. stock
   is
         down
               about
                     another
                           2.50.

   **********************************************************************
                           This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp.
   and/or
      its
               relevant
                        affiliate
                           and
                           may contain confidential and privileged material
      for
         the
               sole
                  use
                     of
                        the
                           intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
      distribution
         or
                     disclosure
                        by
                           others is strictly prohibited. If you are not
   the
            intended
                     recipient
                        (or
                           authorized to receive for the recipient), please
         contact
            the
                     sender
                        or
                           reply
                           to Enron Corp. at
            enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
               and
                     delete
                           all
                           copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
         attachments
               hereto)
                     are
                        not
                           intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and
   do
      not
            create
               or
                        evidence
                           a
                           binding and enforceable contract between Enron
      Corp.
         (or
            any
               of
                     its
                           affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
   other
            party,
               and
                  may
                        not
                           be
                           relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
   by
            estoppel
               or
                        otherwise.
                           Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Fellow ISASarians:

I believe our business practice #11 (or work around #11) will still be
possible under 1.7.  If so, is it worth bringing-up the Control Area Bus
Transfers subject in Andy's letter?  Do we really want to argue for
transmissionless tag in 1.7?

Robert Harshbarger
Puget Sound Energy
OASIS Trading Manager
425.882.4643 (desk)
206.604.3251 (cell)

> ----------
> From: 	Harshbarger, Robert[SMTP:bharsh@puget.com]
> Sent: 	Friday, October 05, 2001 9:17 AM
> To: 	Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
> Subject: 	FW: WSCC Tagging practices
>
> FYI
>
> > ----------
> > From: 	Rodriquez, Andy[SMTP:Andy.Rodriquez@enron.com]
> > Sent: 	Friday, October 05, 2001 8:26 AM
> > To: 	osc@nerc.com
> > Subject: 	WSCC Tagging practices
> >
> > Please review this letter and make sure it is correct.  These issues
> > were brought up in our Phoenix tag training.  I will plan on sending to
> > the IS Monday morning.
> >
> >
> > Members of the IS,
> >
> > In our recent E-Tag 1.7 Training sessions, we had two common issues
> > brought up regarding the way tags are handled in the WSCC.  We would
> > like your guidance and assistance in regard to these issues.
> >
> > 1.) Jointly owned transmission
> >
> > In the west, several jointly owned transmission facilities exist.  In
> > these situations, one particular line or path is managed by a single
> > control area, but has several different Transmission Owners.  In the
> > East, I believe that we  address this situation by having one entity
> > administer a single OATT and the TOs receive transmission revenues as
> > distributions from the administrator of the OATT (much the way that SPP
> > or MAPP distribute regional tariff revenues to their members).
> >
> > In the west, they have taken a somewhat different approach.  In this
> > case, each TO administers their own tariff.  So it is possible (and
> > common practice) for a tag to be written that "stacks" TPs.  So we might
> > see in a tag a three transmission providers all flowing on the same path
> > within the same Control Area:
> >
> > CA	TP	OASIS		PATH
> >
> > AAA	AAA	123456	POINTA/POINTB
> > AAA	BBB	234567	POINTA/POINTB
> > AAA	CCC	345678	POINTA/POINTB
> >
> > Is this procedure valid?  We perceive several potential solutions:
> >
> > a.) Tag as above for convenience
> > b.) Tag as a separate tag for each TP
> > c.) Indicate to WSCC that process is invalid, and let them determine
> > their own solution
> >
> > Some concerns have been raised by some WSCC members that "solution a" is
> > difficult during curtailment processing, as it is hard to determine
> > which cuts should be made at what points.  However, other entities point
> > out that the tag does represent energy flow along a single contract
> > path, and the "stacking" really only identifies contractual
> > relationships (and as such, should be allowed).
> >
> > Regardless of how the issue is resolved, we encourage the development of
> > a standard method for handling this situation, and believe that standard
> > should be developed by either the WSCC or the IS.
> >
> > 2.) Control Area Bus Transfers
> >
> > In the west, there is the practice of moving energy to different Control
> > Area entities at a bus.  In the east, I we accommodate this through
> > title transfers and consider it a market mechanism rather than an
> > operations mechanism.  For example:
> >
> > Merchant MMMMMM Generates 100MW in Control Area AAAA
> > Marketer NNNNNN buys at the bus and sells to OOOOOO
> > Marketer OOOOOO buys at the bus and sells to PPPPPP
> > Marketer PPPPPP buys at the bus and wheels from AAAA to BBBB...
> >
> > In the WSCC, such transactions are tagged in a different manner.
> >
> > Merchant MMMMMM Generates 100MW in Control Area AAAA
> > The energy moves from Control Area AAAA into Control Area NNNN
> > The energy moves from Control Area NNNN into Control Area OOOO
> > The energy moves from Control Area OOOO into Control Area PPPP
> > Marketer PPPPPP buys at PPPP and wheels from PPPP to BBBB...
> >
> > The WSCC practice is not currently supported by E-Tag 1.7.  The
> > structure of E-Tag 1.7 is predicated on the fact that energy cannot move
> > between Control Areas without use of transmission.
> >
> > This issue has recently been discussed by the IS with regard to such
> > situations where transactions use NO transmission (i.e., energy moves
> > between CAs across bus, with no transmission service).  If I remember
> > correctly, the IS discussed several different issues:
> >
> > How can a single bus be simultaneously metered in several different
> > Control Areas?
> > If no physical movement of power occurs, why are these transactions
> > tagged?
> > If the power DOES move (even across a bus) then shouldn't that movement
> > be accomplished under a tariff?
> >
> > As I remember the IS resolution, it was decided that such transactions
> > should indicate the use of PTP transmission if indeed power is moving
> > between Control Areas.  Otherwise, the market turn approach used in the
> > East (illustrated in the first example) should be utilized.
> >
> > This specifically becomes an issue, as E-Tag 1.67 would allow the
> > current WSCC practice and 1.7 will not.  We would encourage the IS to
> > make sure WSCC is fully prepared for this situation, and has WSCC
> > practices in place that address this issue.
> >
> > Andy Rodriquez
> > Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
> > andy.rodriquez@enron.com
> > 713-345-3771
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by
> > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto)
> > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
> of
> > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not
> > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > otherwise. Thank you.
> > **********************************************************************
> >
>


eProcurement

You have been identified as a future user of eProcurement.  eProcurement is
coming to Corporate on Monday, July 2nd!

Keep this information to help you transition to the new eProcurement system.

When should I use eProcurement?
Use eProcurement to buy:
*  Office Supplies:  toner cartridges, printer paper, tablets, pens, and more!
*  IT Hardware:  new hire workstations, monitors, printers, keyboards,
etc.

How does eProcurement work?
*  Go to <http://ibuyit.enron.com> and logon to eProcurement.
*  Use the catalog or a template to fill the shopping cart and order the
items.
*  The request will be processed and fulfilled.  It,s that easy!

If the shopping cart requires additional approval:
*  The shopping cart will automatically be routed for approval based on the
requestor,s reporting structure and the monetary approval limits of their
business unit.
*  The approver will receive e-mail notification that there is a shopping
cart that requires their approval.
*  Upon rejection, the requestor will receive e-mail notification that their
shopping cart was rejected.
*  Upon approval, the shopping cart will be processed and your order
fulfilled.
*  The approver will log onto eProcurement and accept or reject the shopping
cart.
*  Note:  if the shopping cart exceeds your spend limit or contains IT
hardware items it will require additional approval/review.

How do I get security to access eProcurement?
Receipt of this e-mail indicates that you have been identified as an
eProcurement Requestor or Approver, and that you will have access to the
system beginning July 2nd.  Other users should contact ISC Customer Care to
request security to access the system.

How can I receive eProcurement training?
*  Visit the ISC Education Center to sign-up for system demonstrations and/or
hands-on classroom training, and to access on-line training: <
http://iscedcenter.enron.com>
*  Visit the ISC Document library for Quick Reference Cards and other helpful
training materials: <http://isc.enron.com/site/doclibrary/user/default.asp>

Go live packets coming soon!
An eProcurement Go Live packet will be sent to all recipients of this
e-mail.  Packets will include laminated Quick Reference Cards, spend/approval
limits, and other helpful information.  If you do not receive a packet by
July 13th, please contact iBuyit.

Who do I call for help?
Call ISC Customer Care at (713) 345-4727.

Questions?
For general information about iBuyit, send an e-mail to <
mailto:ibuyit@enron.com>.


Mike, lets discuss just after Wayne and I get together to discuss the
technical book or in conjunction.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
06:25 PM ---------------------------

Mike Coleman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/15/2000 03:12 PM
To: ddelain2@ect.enron.com, Dave Parquet
cc: Wayne Mays
Subject: Planning for Technical Support Requirements

Dave and Dave,

Wayne Mays and I are trying to assess technical support requirements for the
next 12-24 months.  We would like to talk with each of you to get you input
on the direction the company is going, and what type and level of support is
likely to be required as we go forward.

If possible, we'd like to schedule a brief (30 minute) conference call,
preferably within the next week, with each of you to discuss these issues.
If you have a time that would be convenient, please let me and/or Wayne know
so that we can get it scheduled.

Thanks!

Mike Coleman


The following is the email I sent Aaron last week.  I called him this morning to confirm if this was accurate.  He's meeting later today with Mary Joyce and said he'll get back to me.  I did not inquire specifically about NuTech--I assume Michelle is doing that.

Teresa

Aaron:

Based on our conversations, it is my understanding that the compensation committee has asked to review compensation plans for our affiliates if we own approximately 50% or more of the company.  The determination of exactly which plans must go to the committee will be made by Mary Joyce upon receipt of a bullet point presentation of the key terms of the plan.  The committee would likely review any compensation plan pursuant to which (i) employees receive equity interests without making capital contributions in cash or other property with reasonably equivalent value to the equity interests, (ii) employees receive equity interests prior to Enron recovering its investment, or (iii) employees are to be offered employment agreements with terms that are not within "Enron norms."  In addition, all significant terms of the compensation plan are to be disclosed in the DASH.

Do I understand this all corrrectly?  Is there anything I have omitted?

If the committee meets only quarterly, timing could certainly be an issue in some transactions.  If that is the case, can special meetings be called?

Teresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corbet, Nancy
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Bushman, Teresa G.
Subject:	Board compensation approval NuTech

Last week Teresa was waiting to hear back from Aaron (sp) regarding the threshold and process for approval. Michelle, Tom Kalb and I have a meeting this aft with Nutech and we all , including John Thompson per his meeting request last week, need to know the steps if any that we need to take on Nutech and similar matters.Michelle/Teresa, appreciate your advice on how best to track this down. Nancy


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081288&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081288
Request Create Date : 1/18/02 2:30:40 PM
Requested For       : jo.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : ICE - External Intercontinental Exchange US Natural Gas
Resource Type       : Applications


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/24/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

"SmartPortfolio.Com" <admin_update@smartportfolio.com> on 03/24/2000 04:12:45
PM
Please respond to "SmartPortfolio.Com" <admin_update@smartportfolio.com>
To: sshackl@ect.enron.com
cc:  (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
Subject: SmartPortfolio.Com Update: Markets Mixed Ending Strong Week

The following is a FREE service brought to you by
SmartPortfolio.Com, located on the Web at
http://www.smartportfolio.com
AOL users click here

Update March 24, 2000

Friday's Market Update: Markets Mixed Ending Strong Week

 1. Friday's Market Action
 2. Internet and Tech Stocks
 3. Notable Earnings Announcements
 4. Notable Upgrades and Downgrades
 5. Stock Splits
 6. IPO Commentary
 7. IPOs Trading Friday
______________________________________________________________

**SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

          SONIC FOUNDRY ANNOUNCES 2:1 STOCK SPLIT!
  Smart!Splits Readers Knew About it Beforehand!  Did you?

Didn't know that Sonic Foundry (Amex:SFO) was going to announce
a stock split today?  Subscribers to the Smart!Splits Report
were informed of this possibility in last week's report!

To find out about the next stock split that can enhance your
portfolio, visit: http://www.smartportfolio.com/freetrials
AOL users
click here
**************************************************************
***********************Advertisement**************************

"A $500 minimum balance let me open and fund an Ameritrade
account.  Hey, how could I not trust someone with 25 years of
experience." http://www.smartportfolio.com/ameritrade

**************************************************************

Need this report sooner?  Please remember that you can always
read the update on our web site at
http://www.smartportfolio.com/update
The update is posted at approximately 6:00 PM EST every day.

The SmartPortfolio.Com Referral Contest is off to the races!  So
even if you only have a few e-mails you want to contribute, you
still are eligible to win cash ($1,000, $500, and $250) in this
contest each month!  How?  Just visit:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/ref for all the details. AOL users click
here

The top 10 point leaders as of 5:00 PM EST today are:

1.  Murtuza Syed
2.  David Wilson
3.  Arshad Siddiquee
4.  Lee Gayda
5.  Mati Johvik
6.  Raul Purificacion
7.  Ziad Elkhalil
8.  Joseph Yatco
9.  Filmon Semere
10. Davina Irwin

1.  Friday's Market Action

                             $ Change   % Change      Close
Dow Industrials                 -7.14     -0.06%   11112.72
S&P 500                         +0.11     +0.01%    1527.46
Nasdaq                         +22.42     +0.45%    4963.03
Internet Stock Index           +16.63     +1.56%    1080.27

A buying binge of Internet and technology stocks sparked Friday
morning's market rally, which led to solid gains on the Dow and
the Nasdaq throughout most of the day, before the Dow finished
lower amid profit-taking by investors, closing a week
characterized by strong performances on the major U.S. indexes
as investors temporarily put aside their concerns about future
interest rate hikes and upcoming quarterly earnings
announcements.

Friday's market action was kicked off by the Commerce
Department's report that new orders for durable goods, including
cars, computers and appliances that are intended to last three
years or more, fell 2.3% in February to $208.45 billion, which
was weaker than analysts' forecasts of a 0.2% decline.
February's numbers for orders of costly U.S. manufactured goods
represent the second month of declines in a row.  The report
came only a few days after the Federal Reserve hiked short-term
interest rates for the second time this year in its ongoing
determination to keep the steaming economy in check.

After boosting stocks on Thursday amid rumors that the mammoth
government antitrust lawsuit against it might be nearing
closure, Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT) is expected to make a sweeping
offer to settle the case as the government eases up on demands
that the software titan be broken up.  If the proposal by
Microsoft is sufficiently wide ranging, then it could result in
final negotiations as early as this weekend among Microsoft
Chairman Bill Gates, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Joel Klein
and Judge Richard Posner, who has been serving as the case's
mediator.  On the other hand, if the proposal is deemed to be
too narrow by prosecutors, it could destroy the settlement
negotiations and throw the case back into the courts.  A federal
judge ruled last year that Microsoft had abused monopoly power
in its Windows computer operating system, which allegedly harmed
consumers, customers and other companies.  Shares of Microsoft
dropped 3/16 (-0.17%) to 111 11/16.

Oil services companies had a strong day on Wall Street, as oil
prices rose on Friday in the wake of a final effort being made
by the U.S. government to persuade OPEC to agree to a big output
hike at next week's gathering of the group.  Halliburton
(NYSE:HAL) gained 7/8 (+2.31%) to 38 3/4, Schlumberger
(NYSE:SLB) closed up 7/8 (+1.13%) to 78 3/16, Transocean
Offshore (NYSE:RIG) rose 1 3/16 (+2.64%) to 46 3/16, Cooper
Cameron (NYSE:CAM) gained 2 1/8 (+3.28%) to 66 7/8, and Smith
International (NYSE:SII) closed up 1 7/8 (+2.50%) to 77.

The drug sector was buzzing over the statement by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) that Propulsid, a popular drug with
nearly $1 billion in sales last year, had been associated with
341 reports of heart rhythm abnormalities, including 80 reports
of deaths.  Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), the maker of the
prescription heartburn drug, reported that it would stop
marketing the product in the U.S. and that it is working with
the FDA to create a special "limited access" program to keep it
available for certain patients that have not been helped by
other treatments.  Following the news, shares of Johnson &
Johnson plunged 10.78% (down 8 5/8) to 71 3/8, while shares of
other drug stocks also had weak performances, with Merck
(NYSE:MRK) dropping 1 1/8 (-1.79%) to 61 3/4, Pfizer (NYSE:PFE)
closing down 3/16 (-0.53%) to 35 1/16, Schering-Plough
(NYSE:SGP) falling 1 1/2 (-3.97%) to 36 1/4, Pharmacia & Upjohn
(NYSE:PNU) dropping 2 9/16 (-4.30%) to 57, American Home
Products (NYSE:AHP) closing down 1 1/2 (-2.77%) to 52 11/16, and
Warner-Lambert (NYSE:WLA) falling 15/16 (-1.00%) to 93 1/16.

The hotel and real estate industries converged on Friday as
MeriStar Hotels & Resorts (NYSE:MMH), which operates 235 lodging
properties, announced that it would acquire BridgeStreet
Accommodations (NYSE:BDS), which offers upscale furnished
apartments, townhouses and condominiums as an alternative to
traditional hotel rooms.  The deal is expected to result in
MeriStar's leading position in the market for providing
temporary housing for executives and business travelers.  Shares
of MeriStar inched up 1/16 (+2.27%) to 2 13/16, while shares of
BridgeStreet soared 29.03% (up 9/16) to 2 1/2.

2. Internet and Tech Stocks

For a FREE trial to SmartPortfolio.Com's in-depth analysis of
selected Internet stocks, please visit:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/freetrial
AOL users
click here

The Nasdaq had another run up on Wall Street on Friday, leading
to more record highs for many Internet and technology stocks
during the day's trading session, including Adobe Systems
(Nasdaq:ADBE), which closed up 1 5/8 (+1.52%) to 108 3/16,
Xilinx (Nasdaq:XLNX), which dropped 1 3/4 (-2.07%) to 82 5/8,
and Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq:SUNW), which closed up 2 11/16
(+2.75%) to 100 1/2.

Cisco Systems (Nasdaq:CSCO) surpassed Microsoft as the biggest
company in the world during Friday's trading session, before
Microsoft regained that distinction in a late-day rally.  Shares
of Cisco closed up 1 9/16 (+2.01%) to 79 3/8, representing a
market cap of $550.7 billion, while shares of Microsoft closed
down 3/16 (-0.17%) to 111 11/16, representing a market cap of
$581.3 billion.

In leading Internet stock news, the Financial Times reported on
Friday that Yahoo! (Nasdaq:YHOO) and online auctioneer eBay
(Nasdaq:EBAY) have resumed the merger talks that had collapsed
earlier this month.  In early March, analysts noted several
strategic benefits that would be derived from a Yahoo-eBay
alliance, but indicated that an acquisition of eBay would be
extremely expensive for Yahoo.  Moreover, questions were raised
with respect to why eBay would desire to sell out at a time when
its business is thriving.  Shares of Yahoo rose 3 (+1.57%) to
194, while shares of eBay jumped 20 3/16 (+9.03%) to 243 3/4.

Business-to-business (B2B) news was topped by reports that four
major players in the aerospace and defense industry are joining
forces to create an online marketplace with B2B powerhouse
Commerce One (Nasdaq:CMRC).  The joint venture, which includes
Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT), Raytheon (NYSE:RTNa), Boeing
(NYSE:BA) and British Aerospace, is being designed to bring
together buyers and suppliers in the industry, allowing them to
buy and sell parts and conduct business over the Internet.
Following the news, shares of Commerce One jumped 18 11/16
(+9.12%) to 223 11/16, while shares of other B2B players
finished the day with mixed results as E.piphany (Nasdaq:EPNY)
closed up 6 1/2 (+3.80%) to 177 1/2 and Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL)
gained 1/8 (+0.14%) to 87, while Ariba (Nasdaq:ARBA) dropped 5
15/16 (-2.24%) to 259 9/16, VerticalNet (Nasdaq:VERT) fell 6
9/64 (-3.23%) to 183 7/8 and VerticalNet (Nasdaq:VERT) closed
down 6 9/64 (-3.23%) to 183 7/8.

The B2B announcement was the latest in a wave of moves by
leading companies in various industries to create online
marketplaces.  It wasn't even the first such deal in the
aerospace and defense industry -- last month, United
Technologies (NYSE:UTX), Honeywell (NYSE:HON) and i2
Technologies (Nasdaq:ITWO) announced plans to launch
MyAircraft.com, an electronic marketplace for aerospace products
and services for approximately 25,000 buyers and sellers.  In a
separate transaction, General Electric (NYSE:GE) recently
created a new online exchange that will allow major airlines to
buy and sell parts via the Internet.  B2B marketplaces also have
sprung up in such industries as chemicals, automobile
manufacturing, construction and pharmaceuticals, as companies
increasingly are seeking to move their supply chains into
cyberspace to reduce the paperwork and time involved in
purchasing, manufacturing and inventory.

The online brokerage sector had a strong day on Wall Street
following the statement by U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray that it
was raising its revenue forecasts for online brokerage giants
Ameritrade Holding (Nasdaq:AMTD) and E*Trade Group (Nasdaq:EGRP)
as a result of recent unprecedented trading volumes.  Shares of
Ameritrade gained 2 5/16 (+10.54%) to 24 1/4, shares of E*Trade
rose 4 1/8 (+14.80%) to 32, while shares of other online
brokerage firms also performed well on the day, with National
Discount Brokers Group (NYSE:NDB) rising 5 5/8 (+11.07%) to 56
7/16, Siebert Financial (Nasdaq:SIEB) gaining 1 9/16 (+11.26%)
to 15 7/16, Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCH) closing up 3 3/8 (+5.51%)
to 64 5/8, Knight/Trimark Group (Nasdaq:NITE) rising 6 5/16
(+11.97%) to 59 1/16, and DLJ Direct (NYSE:DIR) gaining 1 7/16
(+10.04%) to 15 3/4.

Other Internet and technology stock movers included:

<> GoTo.com (Nasdaq:GOTO), which surged 33.17% (up 11 63/64) to
48 7/64 after the Internet search engine company announced on
Friday that it logged more than 2 million unique visitors during
March 2000 and expanded the number of paying advertisers to more
than 25,000.

<> Xircom (Nasdaq:XIRC), which fell 10.21% (down 4 3/16) to 36
13/16 after the maker of products that connect portable personal
computers to telephone systems, networks and the Internet
reported that its quarterly earnings would not meet Wall Street
expectations.

<> Wit Capital Group (Nasdaq:WITC), the parent of online
investment banking group Wit Soundview, which jumped 29.43% (up
4 7/8) to 21 7/16 after reporting that its first quarter
financial results likely will exceed analysts' forecasts.

<> Compaq Computer (NYSE:CPQ), which fell 1 5/16 (-4.39%) to 28
9/16 on very heavy volume based largely on concerns that the
computer company's first quarter earnings may fall short of
estimates as a slowdown in corporate spending on PCs during the
first quarter might create a revenue shortfall.

<> Teledyne Technologies (NYSE:TDY), which jumped 14.68% (up 2)
to 15 5/8 on continued momentum from Wednesday's announcement by
the leading provider of sophisticated electronic and
communications products that it has reached an agreement with
Lockheed Martin to supply turbine engines for the Joint Air-to-
Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) program.

<> Power Integrations (Nasdaq:POWI), which sank 39.97% (down 19
11/16) to 29 9/16 one day after the circuit maker reported that
it expects its first quarter revenues to fall below
expectations.

Leading Internet and tech stocks performed as follows:

Company                      $ Change   % Change      Close
Amazon (Nasdaq:AMZN)               +5     +7.39%   72 11/16
America Online (NYSE:AOL)       +9/16     +0.80%    71 1/16
Commerce One (Nasdaq:CMRC)  +18 11/16     +9.12%  223 11/16
Cisco (Nasdaq:CSCO)           +1 9/16     +2.01%     79 3/8
CMGI (Nasdaq:CMGI)             -41/64     -0.53%   121 5/16
Dell (Nasdaq:DELL)            -1 1/16     -1.85%    56 7/16
Ebay (Nasdaq:EBAY)           +20 3/16     +9.03%    243 3/4
ExciteAtHome (Nasdaq:ATHM)         -2     -6.12%   30 11/16
Exodus (Nasdaq:EXDS)          +2 5/16     +1.35%   173 5/16
Intel (Nasdaq:INTC)           -3 9/16     -2.50%   139 1/16
Juniper (Nasdaq:JNPR)              -1     -0.37%        269
Lucent (NYSE:LU)                 -5/8     -0.96%     64 5/8
Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT)         -3/16     -0.17%  111 11/16
Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL)             +1/8     +0.14%         87
Schwab (NYSE:SCH)            +3 11/16     +6.02%   64 15/16
Sun Micro (Nasdaq:SUNW)       +2 7/16     +2.49%    100 1/4
Qualcomm (Nasdasq:QCOM)        +1 7/8     +1.30%        146
Qwest (NYSE:Q)                 -1 1/8     -2.33%     47 1/4
Yahoo (Nasdaq:YHOO)                +3     +1.57%        194

************************Advertisement************************

***FREE STOCK QUOTES TO YOUR CELL PHONE***

Receive FREE Stock Quotes, News Headlines, Sports Scores, and
Weather Reports to the cell phone or pager that you currently
use.  No need to purchase additional equipment.  Our service is
Free!  Visit us at http://www.celltrader.com/smartportfolio

***FREE STOCK QUOTES TO YOUR CELL PHONE***

**************************************************************
**************************************************************

          TELL OTHER INVESTORS ABOUT SMARTPORTFOLIO.COM

The SmartPortfolio.Com team has received hundreds of positive e-
mails from our subscribers and, as a result, we are compiling a
testimonial section on our Web site for everyone's benefit.  If
you are interested in having your testimonial appear, please e-
mail your comments to Chris McLaughlin, President of
SmartPortfolio.Com, at mailto:chrism@smartportfolio.com and
please indicate your e-mail address, full name, location and the
SmartPortfolio.Com products that you currently are subscribed to
(e.g., Free Update, Smart!Splits Report, Smart!IPO Report
Smart!LargeCap or Smart!Internet Report).  While we will post
your name and location, we will post your e-mail address only if
you indicate to us that we may do so.

***************************************************************

3. Notable Earnings Announcements

There were no notable earnings announcements on Friday.  For a
calendar of recent and upcoming earnings announcements, please
visit: http://www.smartportfolio.com/earnings.asp
AOL users
click here

4. Notable Upgrades and Downgrades

For full coverage of today's upgrades, downgrades and coverage
initiations, please click on the appropriate links below:

-- Upgrades - http://www.smartportfolio.com/upgrades.asp
AOL users
click here

Ciena Corp. (Nasdaq:CIEN) was upgraded by Prudential Securities
to strong buy from accumulate.  Shares of the optical networking
company gained 7 11/16 (+4.97%) to 162 3/8.

Level 3 Communications (Nasdaq:LVLT) was upgraded by Wasserstein
Perella to strong buy from buy.  Shares moved up 4 (+3.61%) to
114 7/8.

Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) was upgraded by Donaldson Lufkin &
Jenrette (DLJ) to buy from market perform.  Shares of the paint
company rose 3/8 (+1.71%) to 22 5/16.

-- Downgrades - http://www.smartportfolio.com/downgrades.asp
AOL users
click here

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) was downgraded by several brokerage
firms, including Merrill Lynch (from near-term buy to near-term
accumulate) and JP Morgan (from long-term buy to market
perform).  See related story above.

Bear Stearns lowered its ratings to neutral from attractive on
three movie theatre companies, including AMC Entertainment
(AMEX:AEN), Carmike Cinemas (NYSE:CKE), and Loews Cineplex
Entertainment (NYSE:LCP).  AMC shares lost 1/8 (-2.35%) to 5
3/16, Carmike shares fell 11/16 (-10.00%) to 6 3/16, and Loews
shares edged lower by 1/16 (-1.61%) to 3 13/16.

-- Coverage Initiations:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/initiated.asp AOL users
click here

Credit Suisse First Boston initiated coverage of 12 auto parts
companies, including Gentex (Nasdaq:GNTX) with a strong buy
rating and a price target of $50 per share and several companies
with a buy rating, including Johnson Controls (NYSE:JCI) with a
$72 target, Lear Corp. (NYSE:LEA) with a $43 target, and Tower
Automotive (NYSE:TWR) with a $24 target.  Gentex shares lost
25/64 (-1.03%) to 37 9/16, Johnson Controls shares fell 2 1/8 (-
3.82%) to 52 1/2, and Lear shares were off 5/16 (-1.16%) to 26
11/16.

J.P. Morgan started coverage of two metals companies, Weirton
Steel (NYSE:WS) and Ryerson Tull (NYSE:RT), with buy ratings.
Weirton shares jumped 9.63% (up 13/16) to 9 1/4 while Ryerson
shares fell 7/8 (-5.51%) to 15.

Homestore.com (Nasdaq:HOMS) was started by First Union
Securities with a buy rating.  Shares of the online real estate
information provider surged 34.21% (up 12 3/16) to 47 13/16.

5. Stock Splits

To obtain the latest information on stock splits, please visit:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/splits
AOL users click
here

This chart shows the companies that will split their shares
during the next 4 business days.  The "Pay" column shows the
payable date.  The "Ex" column refers to the ex-date, the date
on which the stock begins to trade at its split-adjusted price.
The ratio refers to the number of split shares stockholders will
receive (a 2:1 ratio means that stockholders will receive one
additional share for each share they already hold).

Pay     Ex                                     Ann.    Split
Date    Date    Company                  Sym.  Date    Ratio

Mar 24  Mar 27  Pinnacle Systems         PCLE  Feb 04  2-1
Mar 24  Mar 27  Hauppauge Digital        HAUP  Feb 10  2-1
Mar 24  Mar 27  London Pacific           LDP   Mar 13  4-1
Mar 24  Mar 27  Art Tech Grp             ARTG  Feb 29  2-1
Mar 24  Mar 27  JWGenesis Fincl          JWG   Feb 16  3-2
Mar 25  Mar 27  California Software      CAWC  Feb 23  2-1
Mar 27  Mar 28  DiaSys Corp.             DIYS  Feb 25  2-1
Mar 27  Mar 28  Kenneth Cole             KCP   Feb 23  3-2
Mar 27  Mar 28  Linear Tech              LLTC  Jan 18  2-1
Mar 27  Mar 28  Scientific-Atlanta       SFA   Feb 22  2-1
Mar 27  Mar 28  ViaLink                  IQIQ  Mar 01  2-1
Mar 28  Mar 29  Semitool                 SMTL  Feb 29  2-1
Mar 28  Mar 29  Usinternetworking        USIX  Mar 03  3-2
Mar 29  Mar 30  Serena Software          SRNA  Mar 13  3-2

6. IPO Commentary - http://www.smartportfolio.com/ipo
AOL users click
here.

The action in the market today demonstrated how not all IPOs --
even those tech-related -- are created equal.  Investors recent
love affair with communication/semiconductor stocks continued as
Silicon Laboratories (NASAQ:SLAB), a maker of mixed-signal
integrated circuits, bolted 123.79%.  In contrast however,
eMachines (NASDAQ:EEEE), a maker of low-cost computers, fell
8.33%.  eMachines is an interesting story because it actually is
one of the leading PC manufacturers in terms of total PCs
shipped.  Its low-cost model, however, clearly did not sit well
with investors.

Looking ahead to the next few weeks, the IPO pipeline is still
stacked.  While there are still many quality IPOs expected to
come to market, the glut of IPOs will make the top issues
slightly more difficult to find.  Investors are increasingly
scrutinizing business-to-business- and Internet infrastructure-
related issues just as they started to with business-to-consumer
Internet issues when supply became to much.

To find out which of the upcoming IPOs are expected to
outperform, please visit http://www.smartportfolio.com/freetrial
AOL users
click here.

7. IPOs Trading Friday

eMachines Inc (NASDAQ:EEEE) - Provider of low-price branded
personal computers.
Price: 9 Open: 8 3/8 High: 10
Close: 8 1/4 Change: -3/4 (-8.33%)

Etinuum Inc (NASDAQ:ETIN) - Provides an integrated set of
strategic, technological, operational and analytical solutions
for clients e-commerce and other direct-to-customer sales and
marketing initiatives.
Price: 12 Open: 12 1/8 High: 13 1/2
Close: 12 3/8 Change: +3/8 (+3.13%)

Eprise Corp (NASDAQ:EPRS) - Provides software products and
services that enable businesses to manage the information
contained on their Web sites.
Price: 15 Open: 23 1/2 High: 27
Close: +10 1/4  Change: +10 1/4 (+68.33%)

Silicon Laboratories Inc (NASDAQ:SLAB) - Designer and developer
of proprietary, analog-intensive, mixed-signal integrated
circuits, or ICs, for the communications industry.
Price: 31 Open: 64 1/2 High: 79 15/16
Close: 69 3/8 Change: +38 3/8 (+123.79%)

Viasystems Group Inc (NYSE:VG) - A worldwide independent
provider of electronics manufacturing services, or EMS.
Price: 21 Open: 22 High: 23 1/16
Close: 19 5/16 Change: -1 11/16 (-8.04%)

*Indicates an Internet related issue.

To find out more about which IPOs are expected to outperform,
please go to: http://www.smartportfolio.com/freetrial
AOL users
click here.

************************Advertisement*************************

          SONIC FOUNDRY ANNOUNCES 2:1 STOCK SPLIT!
  Smart!Splits Readers Knew About it Beforehand!  Did you?

Didn't know that Sonic Foundry (Amex:SFO) was going to announce
a stock split today?  Subscribers to the Smart!Splits Report
were informed of this possibility in last week's report!

To find out about the next stock split that can enhance your
portfolio, visit: http://www.smartportfolio.com/freetrials
AOL users
click here
***************************************************************

***************************************************************

                PLEASE GIVE US YOUR FEEDBACK

If you have any additional information that you would like us to
include in our newsletter, any additional functionality added to
our website, or any other comments in general, please let us
know by clicking on the following link:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/feedback

***************************************************************

***************************************************************

                 ADVERTISE IN OUR NEWSLETTER

Want to target an attractive demographic representing wealthy,
astute, Internet-inclined investors?  Please send your
advertising inquiries to: mailto:ads@smartportfolio.com

***************************************************************

---
You are currently subscribed to update as: sshackl@ect.enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-update-25348W@smartportfolio.sparklist.com
To change your e-mail address, please visit:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/changeIf you are a Smart!Report subscriber, to
make changes to your account please visit:
http://www.smartportfolio.com/service


Attached is the new list of authorized signers as of 9/15/00


-----Original Message-----
From: CLARK BROCKMAN
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:46 AM
To: JOANN HERMANCE; MONTY HILL; STEVE KAROLYI; 'ERIC LI'; CHUCK SALVADOR;
EDWARD VAIVODA; NOEL SNODGRASS; 'TONY BURKE'; MARY JANE SYMES; RJ JOHNSON;
ANDRE DeBAR
Subject: Will Vision in Vancouver

For all of you who have been inquiring about my recent reduction in
glasses...
Here is the web link to the doctor I used:

 http://www.willvision.com/html/index.html

As most of you know, I heartily recommend these folks based on my
procedure, and my results so far.

But I would also heartily recommend that you do what Kacia and I did and
research all of the LASIK processes out there, and attend competing
seminars discussing them.  We went to the Casey Eye Institute and to Will
Vision.  After attending both seminars, our choice was clear, but it would
not necessarily be the same decision for everyone.

If you have any questions for me - feel free.  I'm still amazed by the
whole thing!

- Clark.


To all supervisors of Associates and Analysts

The Associates and Analysts will be divided into 4 final ranking meetings for the mid-year 2001 PRC.  These meetings are scheduled as follows:
EES Associate & Analyst Final Meeting - June 8
EBS Associate & Analyst Final Meeting - June 19
EWS/Others* Associate & Analyst Final Meeting - June 25
EA Associate & Analyst Final Meeting - July 9

*(EWS/Others includes Associates and Analysts from EWS, EGM, APACHI, CALME, CORP, ECM, EIM, EIP, ENW, ESA, ETS, EOTT, HPL, PGE, EWC, Japan, and EnronCredit).

The Associates and Analysts will be ranked within the following Peer Groups:
Analyst 1 - Analysts with up to one year of service (hired between 3/1/00 and 2/28/01)
Analyst 2 - Analysts with greater than one year of service (hired prior to 3/1/00)
Associate - All Associates hired prior to 3/1/01

Associate and Analyst Ranking Process
Analysts and Associates hired on or after 3/1/01, will receive feedback only, all others will receive both a PRC ranking and feedback.
Each Business Unit Supervisor will be responsible for providing a pre-ranking to the PRC Rep.  The PRC Reps have access to the consolidated feedback for each assigned Associate and Analyst.  Please be sure that you have met with the assigned PRC Rep prior to the final Associate and Analyst meeting for your business unit.  (Your business unit HR department may choose to set up pre-ranking meetings - check with your HR representative).  The final ranking for each Analyst an Associate will be determined through a cross calibration in each of the final meetings.  In these final meetings, the Analysts and Associates will be represented by a PRC Rep from their Business Unit who should be familiar with their accomplishments.

Associate and Analyst PRC Reps
Please refer to the attached spreadsheet for a list of Associates and Analysts who will be ranked in these meetings and their PRC Reps.

Contact me at extension 35230 if you have any additional questions.

Terry Bosien
HR Manager, Associate and Analyst Program


The good news is that the 4th beer usually makes the pain/depression/anger go away. The bad news is that last week it was the 3rd beer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blaine, Michelle
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:20 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	FW: Report

Richard here is what I have--there is an update in progress, but nothing substantive for your purposes.  You have the ESA risk matrix which has the major cases you may want to reveal.  Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with.  I have my cell phone 713-899-6300, or Stephanie has the number to this conference room.  Do you have any good news?  John Gardiner is here from NYC and keeps reminding me "we are all still standing."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truss, Stephanie
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Blaine, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Report

 << File: South America Report.doc >>


Dave

Following up on our summit.  I wrote down that you would follow up on the
synergies or lack there of between the research group and the group run by
Scott Tholen.   I would be happy to coordinate this myself.  Please write
back and let me know if this is okay.


California is electric industry test case

By Deborah Adamson, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 3:03 PM ET Aug 23, 2000
NewsWatch
Latest headlines

SAN DIEGO (CBS.MW) -- The federal government will provide grants and loans to
help local residents and businesses pay for soaring electricity bills,
President Clinton said Wednesday.
Clinton said $2.6 million will be earmarked to help low-income families and
seniors pay for electricity bills that have more than doubled. He urged the
Small Business Administration to provide loans to companies that are
struggling to pay power bills.
He also called for expediting the investigation of wholesale power markets by
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
"We'll do what we can to help you," the president said during a televised
news conference at the White House in Washington.
Test case yields public outcry
The San Diego area is a test case for the rest of the country over the
feasibility of electric industry deregulation. The region -- which also
encompasses South Orange County, north of San Diego -- is the first in the
nation to have its power market completely deregulated.
New York, New England and mid-Atlantic states are following suit, and they're
watching California carefully.
Thus far, the San Diego test has turned out to be a shambles.
Electricity supply that hasn't increased in 10 years failed this summer to
meet strong demand resulting from a growing state. With market forces in play
for the first time, strong demand led to much higher wholesale rates that was
passed along to residents.
After a public outcry, the California Public Utilities Commission on Monday
approved a plan that would cap customers' electric bills for normal use, but
they'll pay market rates for anything extra. Utility companies also can
collect on any shortfalls later.

Today on CBS MarketWatch
Nasdaq inches higher; Dow lags
Oil inventories at 24-year low
Commentary: Garzarelli sees stock rally in fourth quarter
Amazon.com enters car market
California is electric industry test case
More top stories...
CBS MarketWatch Columns
Updated:
8/23/2000 3:02:08 PM?ET

In other words, if the electric company can't pass along the entire cost of
buying the energy for now, they'll be able to pass it along months later.
Therefore, people who are used to seeing lower electricity bills for the
cooler months in fall and winter won't see much of a drop-off.
"It's a shameful pay-now-or-pay-later plan," said Bob Finkelstein, staff
attorney for the Utility Reform Network, a consumer advocacy group.
"California jumped off the deregulation cliff."
State legislators, which have the power to expand on the commission's ruling,
shelved a plan to roll back rates to mid-1999 levels and cap them for
customers of San Diego Gas & Electric, a Sempra Energy (SRE: news, msgs)
subsidiary. They faced opposition from Gov. Gray Davis, a Democrat, and from
Republican lawmakers.
Davis prefers a plan that would cut rates by 60 percent immediately but that
would stipulate customers pay the full amount of what they owe later.
Republican lawmakers want the state to use taxpayers' money to help pay
electric bills for consumers while businesses get tax credits.
San Diego fiasco
The Southern California fiasco came about as a result of a deregulated
electricity market that began two years ago. The effects of deregulation are
being felt first in the San Diego area because it was the first to end its
rate freeze -- last summer. The rest of California should follow, region
after region, by 2002.
The idea sounded good: Deregulate the electric industry and let the market
set the prices. With competition, rates should come down and service should
improve. When the long-distance phone market was deregulated, it did bring
about low prices and greater competition.
But things got messed up along the way.
For one, the hope that consumers and businesses could one day shop for
electricity as they shop for better deals among long-distance carriers was
dashed, at least for now. Initially, hundreds of companies had signed up to
offer power but most have gone out of business or left the market. Of the
remaining companies, most serve the more lucrative corporate market, said
Linda Sherry, a spokeswoman at Consumer Action.
Also, the strategy of letting housing developments form power cooperatives
and negotiate better rates "didn't pan out," Sherry said.
Demand far outstrips supply
Demand for power in California surged as businesses and the population grew.
But supply didn't grow with it because no new electric generation plants have
been built in the state for 10 years. Last year, the state approved five
applications to build new plants, but they're years away from becoming
operational.

Under the deregulated market, electric utility companies were mandated to
sell their power generation plants. By separating the provider of electricity
and the generator of electricity, the idea is to usher in a more competitive
market.
Today, San Diego Gas & Electric buys from electric generators through an
auction market.
But the auction market rules as set up actually make the situation in San
Diego worse. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, when
electric utilities accept bids from generators at various prices, they are
required to pay to everyone the rate of the highest bid. But in a situation
where the electric company needs all the power available, it has to accept
all the bids and apply the highest price to every deal -- inflating the cost.
Electric generators were taking advantage of the situation by charging more,
Sherry said. FERC is investigating and plans to issue a report later this
year. But for now, price caps have been set.
Utility company buffeted
Ed Van Herik, a Sempra spokesman, said the auction rules are putting the
squeeze on utility companies, already buffeted from all sides by public
outcry and political pressure.
But Utility Reform Network's Finkelstein said San Diego Gas & Electric isn't
totally blameless because it could have done a better job of hedging high
costs.
"They could have entered into (futures) contracts to hedge these risks,"
which would have allowed the utility to buy electricity at prices under
normal conditions, the attorney said.?


Mtg w/ Jeannie Mandelker EB 47112


Thanks.  Rest assured they will not see your work product.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Richard,
 Please use the attached.  I have continued Credit's requirement which they
required for the January 22, 2001 confirm.

	Richard Deming@ENRON
	06/04/2001 11:29 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: El Paso Electric Company

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:

Deal Date: 6/01/01
Deal No: VE1156 / 826162
Buyer: El Paso Electric Company
Seller: ENA
Start Date: 1/01/02
End Date: 12/31/02
Firm
Volume: 10,000 / day
Price: 3.75000
Delivery Point: El Paso Natural Gas Co. - San Juan Basin, Blanco (Non-Bondad
Gas)

Please let me know if you need any more details.

Thanks,
Richard
x54886


[IMAGE]
You have received this email because you signed up to receive valuable email offers from RadioStakes or one of our marketing partners.

[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Plus getmuch more...so click herenow! 		[IMAGE]Click here now!   Dear ANDY,  Great news! Your new 50% Hotel Discount Card is ready to be downloaded!  It's a Special Reward... and one of the most valuable downloads on the Internet today!  Click here to download your new 50% Hotel Discount Card today plus get your Bonus $10.00 Gas from your favorite station!    Download your discount card by 01/25/02  and start using it to save 1/2 at over 5,000 popular hotels nationwide! It's not software... but an actual card you can print and use to save 1/2 as soon as today!  Plus you get much more to help you save money every time you travel! Click here now!    You get all this:  50% off the regular room rates at over 5,000 popular Hotels including participating Holiday Inn, Hyatt, Ramada, Days Inn properties and many more!   PLUS you'll enjoy...  24-Hour Road & Tow Protection Nationwide  Up to $100.00 Airline Discount  Up to 30% off Car Rentals   So download your 50% Hotel Discount Card plus get your $10.00 Gas with our compliments! It's easy!Just click here now!    Thanks again and we're sure you'll save money with your 50% Hotel Discount Card!   Sincerely, [IMAGE] Marty Isaac Vice President Travel Values Plus   P.S. You can download your card and start using it right away! Plus you get $10.00 Gas from any station you want!Click here now!    Only available to residents of the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Travel Values Plus is owned and operated by webloyalty.com. All trademarks and or copyrights are the property of their respective owners, and unless otherwise noted, Travel Values Plus is not affiliated with the respective owners. Gas benefit not available for gasoline purchases made in New Jersey. ? 2001, Travel Values Plus

You have received this email because you signed up to receive valuable email offers from RadioStakes or one of our marketing partners.   To no longer receive messages please Click here


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 02:24 PM
---------------------------

ywang@enron.com on 08/15/2000 02:10:34 PM
To: ywang@enron.com, liang.xia@enron.com, "Scott.Neal/HOU/ECT"@ECT, Joe A
Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT)
Subject: New Notice from Southern Georgia Natural Gas Company

Southern Georgia Natural Gas Company posted new notice(s) since our last
check at 8/15/00 1:00:00 PM, the newest notice looks like:

 Sys or Seg Mnt, 08/15/2000 01:44 PM, 08/15/00 02:00:00 PM, East of Wrens
16" main and loop line relocation

Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.

http://www.sonat.com/SonetCrt.nsf/5ab60a5a1d18afa286256666005a4043?OpenView&St
art=1&Count=60&Expand=3#3


=========================================================
This is a courtesy copy of your Invoice that you just created on www.AuctionHelper.com.
The seller has been notified and should follow up shortly.

Sellers Address:
Discount Sportscard Co.
15411 Red Hill Ave.  Suite A
Tustin, CA 92780
Phone: 1-714-259-9200

Ship To:
Jason Wolfe
2300 W Alabama Apt. 6

Houston, TX 77098
United States
Invoice #: 14590

1 - 1012997426 RICKEY HENDERSON * PSA 9 * 1981 FLEER $21.50
========================
Subtotal: $21.50
Shipping: $4.00
Insurance: $0.00
Total: $25.50

Note: If you were unable to print your invoice from the AuctionHelper.com web site, this courtesy
invoice should not be used as a final total for submitting payment unless you are sure of its accuracy.

The above total may or may not be adjusted either higher or lower, according to the sellers
terms of sale.  If you live outside of the sellers country, are required to pay sales tax,
are subject to any additional fees for this invoice, or are eligible for any applicable
discounts that may or may not exist, you should contact the seller before submitting payment.

If you used a credit card online, the seller should follow up with you shortly.

================================
This invoice courtesy of www.AuctionHelper.com - Tell Everyone!


Attached is a spreadsheet with the operating assumptions for the existing ABB
unit.  Ignore the term and pricing, but the per-start charge, VOM, and HR
curves should give you a good starting point.

T


A meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, Tuesday, November 28, 2000 with regard
to the new Trading Track program.

The meeting will be held in 49C1 from 4:00 - 5:00 p.m.

If you have a conflict, please contact Kim Hillis at x30681.


Here is the schedule for the Wheatland plant and the confirms.  Please give
me a call if you have any questions.  Thanks!
Ben


Jeff Skilling is unable to attend.

Thank you,
Joannie Williamson

Dottie Kerr <dottie@kerr-solutions.com> on 05/12/2001 05:17:57 PM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc:

Subject: Harvard Forum 05/18/01 - Second Invite

There are only a few available spaces at the upcoming Harvard Forum.  Don't
miss this new and exciting event.  Make your reservations today.  See
meeting details below.
**********************************************

Harvard University Club of Houston - Harvard Forum
&Raising Children of Character in A World of Affluence8
Dinner and Discussion Club

Join us for a new type of Harvard Club experience.  Ever wanted to talk
substantively about a topic, while having a great dinner, but were afraid
that your dinner guests would not be able to go the distance with you in
the conversation?  We have the solution.

Modeled after a format that members David and Anne Grizzle and Danguole
Spakevicius and William Altman have been enjoying for years, the Harvard
Forum will provide an opportunity for an extended conversation with fellow
club members.

The format works like this:  we,ll have dinner, and then a panel of Harvard
grads will give brief introductions to the evening,s topic from their
perspective, and then we will all engage the topic for ourselves, first in
a large group and then in small groups.  The panel members will be
knowledgeable, but not so expert that anyone will be intimidated.  They
will, however, be provocative to assure that the subsequent conversation is
lively.  You will come away knowing your fellow club members better than
ever - maybe better than you ever wanted.

The topic we,ve picked is one with which many of us have struggled.  Our
children may be growing up in a world far more affluent - privileged - than
we enjoyed.  How imperiled is their character by our success?  What
practical steps can we take to insure that we pass along to them the
character values that we treasure?

We plan to schedule a Harvard Forum every quarter.

Because of the format, attendance is limited.  Please respond as indicated
below.

When:    Friday, May 18, 7:30 p.m.
Where:   Briar Club, 2603 Timmons (East Briar Room)
Cost:      $35.00 per person

Reservations:  Email dottie@kerr-solutions.com or call 281/424-3084
(Payment must be made at time of reservation by credit card or mailing
check to 3413 Cobblestone Lane, Baytown, TX 77521-1956.)

For further information, contact David Grizzle (david_grizzle@yahoo.com or
713-324-2966) or Danguole Spakevicius (danguole@fempartners.com or
713-665-4218).

===================
Dottie Kerr (harvardclub@kerr-solutions.com)
Administrator for Harvard Club of Houston
www.harvardclubofhouston.org


---------------------- Forwarded by Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 05:36 PM
---------------------------

From:  Cecilia Olvera
    06/28/2000 05:34 PM

To: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Grandma Wassup

---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

Alex Saldana
06/28/2000 02:33 PM
To: "Sonya Rodriguez" <sonyardz@hotmail.com> @ ENRON, Nere <nere@myrex.com>,
"marissa merino" <mr0401@hotmail.com>, "Marivel Mercado"
<MMercado@MarathonOil.com> @ ENRON, "Martha Real" <Marthar@mfslcpa.com>,
"Maria Segura" <Marias@mfslcpa.com>, juan lopez <lopey69@yahoo.com> @ ENRON,
Adriana Saldana <asaldana@UH.EDU>, "alicia" <alara@enhancedlaser.com>, "Leal,
Dinorah" <LealD@national-citymortgage.com>, "Jerez, Ernest"
<Ernest.Jerez@usa.xerox.com>, Vanilapuf@aol.com, SMedina@chartertitle.com,
csal314042@aol.com, Stacie.Saldivar@chron.com, "Sandra Martinez"
<MARTINEZ_S@hccs.cc.tx.us>, Cecilia.Olvera@enron.com, sm45818@aol.com, Andrea
R Guillen/HOU/ECT, DKovasovic@aol.com, MBalderas@chartertitle.com,
Heather.Choate@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Grandma Wassup

---------------------- Forwarded by Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------

>
>
>  <<grandma-wassup.mpg>>

 - grandma-wassup.mpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
08:39 AM ---------------------------

"Jim Miller" <jraggie1@pdq.net> on 11/28/2000 07:30:39 AM
To: "Wayne Duncan" <Wayneduncan@hotmail.com>, "Tom Svec"
<tsvec@generalwelding.com>, "Sylvia Gloria" <sgloria@wbctx.com>, "Steve
Schmidt" <sschmidt@urjet.net>, "Russell H. Oechsel" <oechsrh@usa.conoco.com>,
"Rick Crabtree" <Rick.Crabtree@COMPAQ.com>, "Reid Harmon"
<reid@gsihighway.com>, "Randy T. Rogers" <rrogers@wbctx.com>, "Pete Miller
(AOL)" <millerpw@aol.com>, "Pete Miller" <pmiller@fciconnect.com>, "Paul
Terry" <Paul.Terry@COMPAQ.com>, "Paul Heidaker" <psheidaker@aol.com>, "Pat
Duncan" <wpduncanjr@aol.com>, "Mike. W. Sowden"
<Mike.W.Sowden@supervalu.com>, "Mike Vineyard" <qcgi@qualitec.com>, "Michael
Murr" <Michael.Murr@COMPAQ.com>, "Mcintyre" <mcintyre@tca.net>, "KAREN
MILLER" <KAREN.MILLER@cfisd.net>, "Julie Paxton" <JuKaPa129@aol.com>, "John
Terry" <Tangler@usa.com>, "Jimmy Martin" <Jimmy.Martin@COMPAQ.com>, "Jim
Lawler" <wb365@email.msn.com>, "Jim F. Tillson"
<Jim.F.Tillson@usa.conoco.com>, "Jesse Khangura" <kjskhangura@aol.com>,
"Janey Sowden" <janebarb@aol.com>, "Gene Stpierre"
<Gene.Stpierre@COMPAQ.com>, "Fred Valente" <fvalente@micro.ti.com>, "DAVID
COOK" <DAVID.COOK@cfisd.net>, "DARRON GIRON" <dgiron@ect.enron.com>, "Danny A
Dequeant" <Danny.Dequeant@cmcsg.com>, "CORINA DOMINGUEZ"
<cdominguez@wbctx.com>, "Chris Strong" <cstrong@strongpointe.net>, "Cheryl
Sparkman" <cheryl@keystoneexec.com>, "Carla Preston"
<cdspreston@earthlink.net>, "Bob Lanham" <blanham@wbctx.com>, "AKoebig"
<AKoebig@aol.com>, "A. J. Sowden" <ASowden@aol.com>
cc:
Subject:

 - Paintjob.jpg


Dear Members & Friends:

In addition to the meetings being organized in San Francisco on Sept 11 (see
www.usibc.com for details), the program for the Sept 14- Washington, DC
portion of the Prime Minister's visit to the United States are being
finalized.? We have had to work around the schedules of U.S. Commerce
Secretary Norman Mineta, who is leaving for Chicago mid-afternoon, and Prime
MInister Vajpayee, who is busy until the late afternoon.? Here is the updated
agenda.? :

_________________________

Main Track

Participation at the Commercial Dialogue & Prime Minister Reception will be
limited to one representative per company, except for corporate sponsors and
in cases where your company will be represented by the Chairman, Vice
Chairman, President or CEO, in which case a second participant will be
allowed to staff.

10:00am:? U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Live broadcast of Prime Minister
Vajpayee's address to joint session of Congress (see below).

10:30am:? U.S. Chamber of Commerce: U.S.-India Commercial Dialogue meeting
begins, with U.S. Commerce Secretary Mineta, Indian Commerce Minister
Murasoli Maran, and other U.S. & Indian Gov't dignitaries.

12:30pm: U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Luncheon program

? 2:00pm: U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Sectoral panel discussions

? 5:00pm: U.S. Chamber of Commerce: U.S.-India Business Council Reception for
Prime Minister Vajpayee.

___________________________________

Congressional Track:

Seating at the following events is extremely limited.? The USIBC plans to
hold a small number of seats for these events for sponsors of the U.S.-India
Commercial Dialogue & Prime Minister's reception later in the day at the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce.

10:00am:? Capitol Building: Prime Minister Vajpayee addresses joint session
of Congress.

12:30pm:? Capitol Building: Congressional Caucus on India Affairs hosts
luncheon with Prime MInister Vajpayee (invited guests only)

___________________________________

There are sponsorships available for the Commercial Dialogue & Prime
Minister's reception at $15,000 each.? Sponsors will receive a variety of
benefits, including :

Preferential seating assignments at seated portions of meeting;
Private meetings with Indian Government officials (pending availability);
Logo on signage & printed materials;
Speaking role for senior officer of sponsoring company;
2 Free tickets for representatives of sponsoring company;
Tickets for Prime Minister address to Congress and India Caucus luncheon
(pending availability).

Please respond to me with any questions.? I expect registration to begin at
the end of this week or early next week, once we have a final list of Indian
& U.S. Government dignitaries expected to attend.

Regards,
Rick

Richard M. Rossow
Associate Director
U.S.-India Business Council
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
1615 H Street, NW
Washington, DC? 20062

Tel: (202) 463-5323
Fax:(202) 463-3173


Thanks for sending the chart.  I will send you the list of questions we
discussed tomorrow.  In the interim, I had a couple of questions on the
chart:  On the first line (physical, no master), is the basis for not
requriing the confirm to be signed the UCC?  Also, what is meant by "unless
commodity not 'good'"?

Thanks.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/11/2000 09:53:03 AM
To: "'gkutzschbach@fulbright.com'" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com>,
"'areynaud@coral-energy.com'" <areynaud@coral-energy.com>,
"'dwhaley@coral-energy.com'" <dwhaley@coral-energy.com>,
"'TSeigler@coral-energy.com'" <TSeigler@coral-energy.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA / Coral Turbine Transaction

 <<2R6LRED.DOC>>  <<2RM3RED.DOC>>  <<2RLSRED.DOC>>  <<2R6KRED.DOC>>

We have enclosed the following documents for your review:

 1. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 2. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from the draft
circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000;

 3. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Letter Agreement for
CA Energy Development II, LLC pertaining to the transformer, marked to
reflect revisions from the draft circulated by King & Spalding on
12-09-2000; and

 4. Revised draft dated 12-11-2000 of the Liability Company
Agreement of CA Energy Development I, LLC, marked to reflect revisions from
the draft circulated by King & Spalding on 12-09-2000.

We still need confirmation of the name of the last director for the LLC and
the date for exercising the call/put option in Section 6.2 of the LLC
Agreement.  Please advise at your earliest convenience.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King &  Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures: 128541vR13/12
  129099v4/3
  129088v5/4
  128540v9/8

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6LRED.DOC
 - 2RM3RED.DOC
 - 2RLSRED.DOC
 - 2R6KRED.DOC


Good to hear from you.  Happy Anniversary.  Arianna is growing everyday.  I
have been working long hours,
so she looks different every time I come home to her and Kati.  Kati is
well, trying to adjust to motherhood and
constantly watching over the baby.  She is off until September 1.  No major
plans for the summer.  Going to
Boston the third week in July for 5 days.  My golf game is barely treading
above water.  Don't play enough.  Such
is life.  Say hello to Megan and your family for me.  I hope we can get
together when you are in town. Until then, go sox.

Jon

                    Benjamin.Rogers
                    @enron.com             To:     JPenney@hollandlessard.com
                                           cc:
                    06/08/00 06:57         Subject:     Re:
                    PM

Hey Jon;
Just e-mailing to see how everyone is doing.  Megan and I are going over to
Austin to a resort to celebrate our 1st anniversary - I can't believe it.
I've been trying to work on the golf game, but I'm taking a couple of
graduate business courses at night so that keeps me pretty busy on the
weekends as well.  Hope all is well and I'll talk to you soon.
Go Sox!
Ben


-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy.Derecskey@enron.com [mailto:Cindy.Derecskey@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:23 AM
To: J_Martin@baylor.edu
Cc: Christie.Patrick@enron.com; Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Enron Case Study
Importance: High

Good morning Mr. Martin,

I would like to introduce myself.  I currently work with Christie Patrick
and Michael B Rosen in the Enron University Affairs department.

In recent discussions with Christie, she has suggested that I liaise with
you and our management in preparation for your and Vince Kaminski's case
study.  Christie has forwarded recent emails sent by you suggesting a few
convenient times that work with your schedule.  I will work with our
management and do my best to schedule one hour time slots for interviews
that fit with your outline.

Initially, I will schedule interviews with: Ken Lay - chairman and CEO,
Jeff Skilling - president and COO, and Andy Fastow - CFO.  If you feel that
you may need to speak with additional management, we will definitely try to
work something out the same day, so you don't have to travel back here.  I
will forward your project outline to the aforementioned participants once
the interviews are scheduled.  Do you anticipate drafting specific
questions?  If so, I would greatly appreciate a copy when convenient.

I greatly look forward to working with you and I hope that we can touch
base very soon.

Regards,

Cindy Derecskey
Enron University Affairs
(713) 853-5670


Thought you all might be interested in this...... It's a long long report on
Enron!
Bilal


---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 12:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Sandi M Braband on 11/21/2000 10:36 AM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gas Management Agreement

Attached is the red lined draft of the Gas management Agreement with the
changes we discussed. Please review and give me your comments. If you can
supply any of the needed Notice info in Section 8 please let me know---