Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received: by mail2.aracnet.com (mbox dquillen) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop
(v1.31 1998/05/13) Wed Mar  7 17:09:18 2001)
X-From_: steelheader75@hotmail.com  Wed Mar  7 14:28:20 2001
Return-Path: <steelheader75@hotmail.com>
Received: from hotmail.com (f32.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.32]) by
mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f27MSKk04765 for
<dquillen@aracnet.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:28:20 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:28:19 -0800
Received: from 128.193.84.130 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed,
07 Mar 2001 22:28:13 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [128.193.84.130]
From: "Bill Barnes" <steelheader75@hotmail.com>
To: stroup@mailbox.orst.edu
Subject: Fwd: New Arkansas Quarter
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:28:13 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_6126_2950_1b53"
Message-ID: <F32t7hvvFCorX9B0kY800001698@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2001 22:28:19.0318 (UTC)
FILETIME=[E937C960:01C0A755]
Content-Length: 61551

>From: "Dennis Ruth" <classy53@home.com>
>To: "Chuck Yengst" <cty6460@aol.com>, "Chuck White" <cmwhite39@home.com>,
>"Carlena Weeks" <eve@proaxis.com>, "David Wardrop" <wardropfam@home.com>,
>"Brian Wallace" <Brian.L.Wallace@noaa.gov>, "Aurora Versolenko"
><auringv@yahoo.com>, "Joseph Sottile" <Jsottile@webtv.net>, "Charlie &
>Jenny Shade" <cjshade@ix.netcom.com>, "John Seiber"
><John_Seiber@hotmail.com>, "Pat Salts" <saltsr@datastar.net>, "Jason Salts"
><nawlins3_1999@Yahoo.com>, "Betsy Richardson" <blksheep@peak.org>, "Bill
>Resavy" <ResavyWJ@hqmc.usmc.mil>, "Bruce Reese" <brucereese@aol.com>, "Tina
>Parlee" <CParlee@email.msn.com>, "George Moody" <george.moody@noaa.gov>,
>"Paul Mlsna" <pnlmlsna@yahoo.com>, "Bob McAnany" <bobmack@wpa.net>, "Bill
>Lake" <blake007@earthlink.net>, "Lee Jager" <leejag@proaxis.com>, "Pat
>Jacks" <patjacks@aol.com>, "Martin Hoque" <MartyHoque@hotmail.com>, "Robert
>Hicks" <robertwhicks@prodigy.net>, "Randy Henninger" <rhenn-go24@home.com>,
>"Scott Goff" <scottagoff@yahoo.com>, "Mike Gilroy" <m.gilroy@gte.net>,
>"Dennis Frisbie" <dfrisbie3@home.com>, "Chuck Fisk"
><cjfisk@worldnet.att.net>, "Chris Fakes" <cfakes@mmcable.com>, "Vic Eden"
><vic33_3@yahoo.com>, "Mike Dotson" <dotsonm@naswi.navy.mil>, "Joe Covert"
><Joe.Covert@noaa.gov>, "Chris Cottone" <ccott1@hotmail.com>, "Karen
>Corbett" <corbett@proaxis.com>, "Bernie Cohenour" <oceanog@hotmail.com>,
>"Jim Clark" <jamesm@proaxis.com>, "Dave Carsten" <davecarsten@hotmail.com>,
>"Rickey Bradley" <rickeyanddiana@earthlink.net>, "Matthew Bodowsky"
><MBODOSKY@NCDC.NOAA.GOV>, "John Berger" <john.berger@cablespeed.com>,
>"Terry Battilino" <TERRYBATT@HOTMAIL.COM>, "Bill Barnes"
><steelheader75@hotmail.com>, "FRANK  BAILLIE" <xwxguynavy@prodigy.net>
>Subject: New Arkansas Quarter
>Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:21:29 -0800
>
>GlacierAll:
>
>Everyone knows about the U.S. mint is releasing 50-state quarters.
>Attached is the Arkansas design.  A tribute to "Bill" (if you get the
>hidden meaning).
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Dennis
>
>Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - Arkansas Quarter.jpg


Has Jeff entered his deals yet because Prebon is waiting to checkout with me.

Thanks


Hi Jeannie:

My apologies.  I've been switched over to Windows 2000 and, well, things have
been somewhat bumpy.  I have a few comments on the Frevert piece but can't
find the document you sent.  Could you resend it?

Best,
Jeff


OOooohhhhh...just looked at the Surfside cam and its...well, damn. Its ON boys. Go...go now...do not wait. Cancel all evening appointments and go. Wind is 6 mph out of the Northwest...that wont last long.

Report from yesterday...Fished West side of Pelican Island shoreline on point closest to Sand Island  waist deep over shell. Caught 6 on Chart/Orange/blue Top Dog and blue/chart/silver mirrolure.
LOST THE STAR TOURNEY LEADER TROUT!!!! Blew up on TopDog, got her to hand...I was shaking like a freaking leaf. Made "the grab" she exploded out of my hand, threw the hook, and Top Dog lodged in my shirt!!! 2nd 28?plus trout I've lost on that shoreline in 2 years!!! Then, after I quit shaking and what not, I realized I wasn't even ENTERED in the damn tourney, so I am glad I didn't catch her!!! She was every inch of 28 and fat with hardly any spots. Big, old female. Damn I love fishing.

										OINK

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:30 AM
To: akoenig@hhw-law.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: surf looking realy good

surf cams show flat and green. fishing reports positive. forcast unkown.
Zander says he will fish surf tomorrow am if looks good. Alfred, you still
planning on going down tonight for your galveston hearing?

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Dear Larry Campbell:
On September 28, 2001, new NASD/NYSE day trading margin requirements
will go into effect for all brokers. The new industry-wide day trading
rules outline specific requirements that all accounts that frequently
day trade must comply with.
While the new day trading rules offer increased leverage, they also
present the opportunity for greater losses. We ask that you take
the time to understand how the new day trading rules will affect
your account.
My account hasn't been tagged as a pattern day trader account. What
does this have to do with me?
Datek is giving all margin accounts access to the additional day
trading buying power as permitted by the new rule. Unless your
account's trading pattern matches that of the NASD/NYSE day trading
margin rule, you will not be required to meet day trading margin
restrictions. However, we still ask that all margin account holders be
educated on the new rules as they may affect your account. Should your
account be tagged as a pattern day trading account in the future,
Datek will notify you of the designation.
What are the new day trading margin requirements for pattern
day traders?
A "pattern day trader" is defined as an account that makes 4
round-trip day trades (buying and selling the same security in one
day) in any rolling 5 business day period. Pattern day traders will be
subject to a new set of day trading rules and requirements. Here's
what you need to know:
? Under the new rules, customers that have been identified as
   pattern day traders must maintain $25,000 in marginable equity at
   all times. Pattern day trader accounts that fall below the $25,000
   NASD/NYSE minimum will be restricted to cash transactions only,
   until the minimum equity amount is reached. Go to
   http://www.datek.com/helpdesk/transfers.html  to find out how to
   transfer equity or http://www.datek.com/helpdesk/deposits.html
   for information on depositing cash and securities to meet the new
   $25,000 minimum.
? A day trading margin call will be generated as soon as an executed
   day trade in a pattern day trader account exceeds the day trading
   buying power. Customers will have 5 business days to fulfill a day
   trading margin call. Only a deposit of cash or fully paid securities
   can satisfy a day trading margin call.
? A day trading call must be met in 5 business days. If the day
   trade margin call is not satisfied by the fifth business day, the new
   NASD/NYSE rules require that the account be restricted to trading on a
   cash available basis for 90 days or until the day trade call is met.
How am I given increased leverage under the new rules?
The new rules modify the day trading buying power calculations,
giving you access to 4 times the margin maintenance excess. This
is a two-fold increase in the possible leverage available under
current rules.
Example: A pattern day trader with a cash balance of $30,000 and no
positions in their account would have access to $120,000 day trading
buying power ($120,000 = (4*30,000)).
Day trading buying power is calculated based on the positions and cash
in an account at the end of the trading day. Generally, you can
calculate your day trading buying power using the following formula:
[75% of the Long Stock Value (LSV) - 130% of any Short Stock Value
(SSV) + Cash]*41
As an added benefit, we will display your day trading buying power in
real-time on your portfolio and trading pages as soon as the new rules
go into effect. This buying power figure is the amount available for
day trading. Day trading buying power does not change based on gains
and losses in your account that occur intra-day.
Be aware that all margin accounts will have access to the greater of
either their stock buying power or their day trading buying power. Our
systems will always allow an order to go through based on the higher
buying power amount. Since our systems have no way of determining
whether you will hold the position overnight or just for the day, it's
your responsibility to enter trades that remain within the buying
power for the type of trade you're making.
What can I do to meet a day trading margin call?
Should you need to meet a day trading margin call, the fastest way is
by wiring funds to your account or sending an overnight check. For
help with mailing addresses and wire instructions, go to http://www.datek.com/helpdesk/deposits.html . Remember, day trading
calls can only be met by depositing cash or non-margined securities.
Is this industry-wide? Will all brokers have to comply with
these rules?
The new day trading rules are NASD/NYSE requirements that will have to
be followed by all brokers. We are ready for these changes and are
taking all the right steps to make sure you are ready as well. If your
account is tagged as a pattern day trading account according to the
new NASD/NYSE definition, you will receive notification from Datek. If
your account has already been tagged as a pattern day trader under the
current rule, the tag will remain in place for 90-days after your last
day-trade and you will be required to be in compliance with the new
rule as of September 28, 2001.
Fully understanding your risk tolerance and the new NASD/NYSE margin
requirements allows you to better manage your margin account. Please
review our Helpdesk at http://www.datek.com/helpdesk/margin.html#daytrading  for more
information on the new day trading rules. If you have questions about
the NASD's new margin requirement or need assistance with your
account, please email our customer support staff 24 hours a day, 7
days a week at support@datek.com, or call 1-877-94-DATEK
(1-877-943-2835) from 8 AM to midnight ET on weekdays, and from 9 AM
to 7 PM ET on weekends.
Sincerely,
Datek Online Financial Services LLC
Above examples are for illustrative purposes only.
1 Portfolios with low priced short positions are calculated
slightly different. Please consult our Help Desk for more information
on calculating D.T. Buying Power with short positions.
System response and access times may vary due to market conditions,
system performance and other factors.
? 2001 Datek Online Financial Services LLC, Member NASD/SIPC
CC-DA52 / #75596


FYI.

Indexing avoided cost to CDWR purchases sounds like about a 5-yr process to
me.

GAC
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/14/2001 03:10
PM ---------------------------

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 03/14/2001 03:05:42 PM
To: "'Alan Comnes'" <alan.comnes@enron.com>, "'Alex Makler (E-mail)'"
<alexm@calpine.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>,
"'Allen Jensen (E-mail)'" <al.jensen@nrgenergy.com>, "'Andy Gilford
(E-mail)'" <agilford@wbcounsel.com>, "'Armen Arslanian (E-mail)'"
<Armen.Arslanian@gecapital.com>, "'Bert Hunter'"
<rjhunter@spectrumcapital.com>, "'Bill Adams (E-mail)'" <sangorgon@aol.com>,
"'Bill Barnes (E-mail)'" <bill.barnes@lgeenergy.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bo Buchynsky (E-mail)'" <BBuchynsky@aol.com>, "'Bob
Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>,
"Bob Szymanski (E-mail)" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "Bob Tormey
(E-mail)" <rjtormey@duke-energy.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Charles Johnson (E-mail)'" <c.johnson@ejgd.com>,
"'Charles Linthicum (E-mail)'" <charles.linthicum@powersrc.com>, "'Cody
Carter (E-mail)'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet (E-mail)'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Diane Fellman (E-mail)'"
<difellman@energy-law-group.com>, "'Don Scholl (E-mail)'"
<dscholl@purenergyllc.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Doug Levitt (E-mail)" <SDL@calwind.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Maddox (E-mail)'"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Edward Lozowicki (E-mail)'" <elozowicki@sjo.coudert.com>, "'Edwin Feo
(E-mail)'" <efeo@milbank.com>, "'Eric Edstrom (E-mail)'"
<edstrome@epenergy.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Floyd Gent (E-mail)'"
<fgent@thermoecotek.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hal Dittmer (E-mail)'"
<hedsf@aol.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Iliff Steve
(E-mail)'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Janet Heck Doyle (E-mail)'" <jheckdoyle@aol.com>,
"'Joe Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'"
<joer@calpine.com>, "'John O'Rourke'" <orourke.john@epenergy.com>, "'Jonathan
Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kawamoto, Wayne'"
<wkawamoto@wm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken
Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Ken Salvagno (E-mail)'"
<kbssac@aol.com>, "'Kent Burton (E-mail)'" <kent_burton@ogden-energy.com>,
"'Larry Kellerman'" <kellerman.larry@epenergy.com>, "'Lucian Fox (E-mail)'"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "'Mark Fillinger'" <mark.fillinger@enron.com>,
"'Mark J. Smith (E-mail)'" <mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "'Mike Hawkins (E-mail)'"
<hawkins@2000energy.com>, "'Milton Schultz (E-mail)'" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>,
"'Nam Nguyen (E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Paul Wood (E-mail)'"
<paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos (E-mail)'"
<Paula_Soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Pete Levitt (E-mail)'" <Pete@calwind.com>,
"'Peter H. Weiner'" <peterweiner@paulhastings.com>, "'Phil Reese (E-mail)'"
<rcsc@west.net>, "'Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)'" <rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>,
"'Robert Frees (E-mail)'" <freesrj@apci.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'"
<ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Scott Harlan (E-mail)'" <harlans@epenergy.com>,
"'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tandy McMannes (E-mail)'"
<mcmannes@aol.com>, "'Ted Cortopassi (E-mail)'"
<ted_cortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "'Thomas Heller (E-mail)'"
<hellertj@apci.com>, "'Thomas Swank'" <swank.thomas@epenergy.com>, "'Tom
Hartman (E-mail)'" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'Ward Scobee (E-mail)'"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Bob Judd (E-mail)'" <caltech@ns.net>,
"'Brian T. Craggq'" <bcragg@gmssr.com>, "'J. Feldman'" <jfeldman@mofo.com>,
"'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Kristy Rumbaugh
(E-mail)'" <kristy_rumbaugh@ogden-energy.com>
cc: "Douglas Kerner (E-mail)" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Carol Hudson (E-mail)"
<carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie
Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>

Subject: FW: CPUC ALJ Ruling in SRAC Proceeding

FYI.  Attached is a Ruling from CPUC ALJ Cooke in response to the QF/SRAC
issue.  Essentially, the Ruling directs DWR to provide cost data associated
with their contracts by March 19.  Presumedly, the CPUC will review the data
and make a determination as to whether these data in some way represent a
utilities "avoided cost." As noted in the ruling, in order for the CPUC to
utilize these types of data for determination of SRAC, Section 390 of the
Public Utilties Code needs to be amended.

Thus, we're back to the legislature.  In many ways, the CPUC, legislature,
and the Gov are "tossing the ball" which creates more delay.  We can discuss
this on the Friday morning call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Fellman [mailto:difellman@energy-law-group.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:57 PM
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail); Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)
Subject: CPUC ALJ Ruling in SRAC Proceeding

In case you didn't get this....

 <<03-14-01 ALJ Cooke_Ruling for DWR_information.doc>>

Diane I. Fellman
Energy Law Group LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2700
Oakland, CA  94612
415.703.6000 (direct dial)
415.703.6001 (direct facsimile)
difellman@energy-law-group.com

 - 03-14-01 ALJ Cooke_Ruling for DWR_information.doc


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/21/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------
From: Thane Twiggs@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/21/2000 02:30 PM
To: Harry Kingerski@EES, James D Steffes@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES
cc:
Subject: CAL PUC

The commission just passed on a 3/2 vote the Duque position.  Duque was the
plan where "approximately 70% of all residential customers who consume 500
kWh or less will pay no more than $68 per month for electricity."  "The plan
will alsoensure that the approximately 70% of all commerical customers who
consume 1,500 kWh or less will pay no more than $220 per month."

Commissioner Lynch fears that the Duque plan will be tied up in legal
disputes rather than provide rate relief to the consumers.


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,726,690
11/13/00 MANAGEMENT-PWR 243,892
11/13/00 AGG-MANAGEMENT 2,785,081


I believe I already have it.  I'll look.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Darnell" <dmoore21@charter.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.; Carlos D. Giron
Subject:	SK Book

I seem to have two copies of Dolores Claiborne by  S. King. Do either  of you want it?  Geaux Tigers!!!
MOM

 - Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG << File: Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG >>


Ms. Nony is busy for  lunch.  Is 12:30 OK?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


We have received the executed Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement from the
referenced CP dated 11/22/2000.  Copies will be distributed to legal and
credit.

This is an EEI Agreement.


Cindy - please see the attached tables and graphs.   I would print out
"ROW-Case2", and "Model".  The graph is hard to read unless there is a color
printer.  Even then, it is much better to review electronically since there
are hidden "notes" that appear when the reader uses the cursor to "point" to
any given data point.

I'd suggest the boss look at the electronic version of the graph while
reviewing hard copy of the "ROW-Case2", and "Model".

Let me know if he would like to discuss...Louie

---------------------- Forwarded by Jan Cobden/ET&S/Enron on 01/31/2000 08:54
AM ---------------------------

James Centilli
01/31/2000 07:41 AM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Navajo ROW

Please find attached the new worksheet and graph.  I add the rods to the
calculation and made the adjustments per Stan's comments.  Review and let me
know if I included everything.  If you need the graph in color, we have a
color printer.  When is the meeting scheduled?

Thanks,
James


You may have seen this when it first came out a while back ... but it's worth
a rerun.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001
01:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt on 06/13/2001 01:49 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: California's dim bulbs

California's dim bulbs
P J O Rourke

04/01/2001
Regulation
64
Copyright (c) 2001 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights
reserved. Copyright Cato Institute Spring 2001

THE FINAL WORD
CALIFORNIA IS IN THE MIDST OF AN ENORmous stupidity crisis. Californians have
been sitting in the dark because ... they didn't turn the lights on.
They say they're short of electricity. Yes, they are. Between 1988 and 1998,
California's electricity consumption increased by 15 percent. Meanwhile
California's capacity to generate electricity shrank by five percent, even as
the state hesitated to build new power lines to tap into neighboring states'
power supplies.
Californians didn't want dams across their rivers, derricks on their ocean,
power lines across their borders, or fossil fuel smoke in their sky. These
might interfere with all the smart things Californians do, such as
hang-glide. California was going to rely on "negawatts" - dramatic power
conservation. (But California regulators put price controls on electricity
that lowered prices, and even Californians weren't dumb enough to skip a
bargain.) And California was going to rely on alternative power generation.
With all the puffery from Silicon Valley dot.com start-ups, wind farms
wouldn't be a problem. And doesn't Gwyneth Paltrow's star shine bright enough
to operate a solar panel? But it turns out that alternative power generation
is an alternative, mostly, to generating power.
Californians are people who insist on growing their own vegetables, but they
won't dig up the pretty lawn, won't plant anything for fear of getting dirty,
and they use fragrant bath salts from The Body Shop instead of smelly
compost. Let them make their crudites with crab grass. President Bush was
wrong to grant an extension of executive orders requiring out-of-state
utilities to supply power to California. And everyone is wrong to listen to
Californians whine about electricity deregulation.
There never was any deregulation. The California Public Utilities Commission
merely changed its regulations, which apparently weren't stupid enough to
meet Golden State standards. Under California's 1996 re-regulation plan,
electric companies sold their generating plants and became distributors. They
were required to buy their power on the wholesale spot market and forbidden
to enter into any long-term power supply contracts. Retail electricity prices
were lowered by 10 percent and frozen at the new rate until March 2002.
This is like requiring A&P to sell you porterhouse at $2 a pound, no matter
what the price of beef on the hoof. Imagine how many steaks there would be,
and how many supermarkets. Go to one of those boarded-up grocery stores,
purchase a phantom T-bone, screw it into a ceiling fixture, and try to light
your house. You're in California.
Californians devised a system of electricity sales that ignored every
dimension of the free market. (Interesting that the "Information Economy" is
centered in a place that's immune to information.) The free market is a
yardstick, and Californians got smacked with it. Mideast oil jitters, cold
weather, natural gas price spikes, and the plain unpredictable freedom of the
free market caused wholesale electricity costs to rise and California
utilities to go $12 billion into the red.
California's governor Gray Davis responded with the full force of bikini
beach brain. In a January 8 speech to the state legislature, Davis proposed
creating a state agency to buy generating plants and build new ones. He
threatened to expropriate power generators and transmission grids. He called
for laws to allow criminal prosecution of wholesale suppliers who withheld
electricity from California markets. And he said the state's universities and
community colleges would build co-generating plants and become energy
independent. (With gas produced by the cafeteria food?) Gray Davis sounded
like Joseph Stalin with the IQ of Keanu Reeves. "Everyone should understand
that there are other, more drastic measures that I am prepared to take if I
have to," Davis declaimed.
"Take" is the key word. Grabby Californians tried to regulate themselves into
some cheap electricity. Hoggish California power companies went along because
the stateimposed retail price ceiling was also a retail price floor.
According to the Los Angeles Times, during the first 28 months of the scheme,
Pacific Gas and Electric and California Edison made $20 billion from the
legally required mark-up between wholesale and retail electric prices.
Californians want to snatch that money back. "Consumer advocates around
California... said it did not matter that the utilities were returning
investments to their shareholders," reported the January 31 Washington Post.
"They took the money and ran," said state senator John Burton. As opposed to
Californians, who took the electricity and roller-bladed? Now the juice and
the jack are both gone, and the California legislature has had to pass a bill
authorizing $10 billion to try to clean up the mess.
But the Californians could still pull a scam. The bill mandates long-term
power contracts at rates that are way above what future prices should be. The
hope, one guesses, is that Congress, or the President, or somebody will let
the state skip out on those contracts once the costs are lower.
It would be wrong to call Californians stupid. They're sleazy, too.
R J. O'Rourke is the Cato Institute's H. L. Mencken Research Fellow and is
foreign affairs desk chief for Rolling Stone. He is author of several
bestselling books, including Parliament of Whores, Give War a Chance, Age and
Guile, and Eat the Rich.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


You need to speak with the developer.  There is no way to control the
inclusion of "Other Agreements" in the "All Agreements" section as the system
is currently designed.

I am not disagreeing with you; I learned this the hard way a few months ago.
The system is confusing.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

It has been my understanding that the first section is supposed to be for
master swap agreements only.  Having other documents listed in that section
may be misleading to some parties who may misconstrue their use for general
trading purposes, such as Global Contracts.  That is why we created the
"Other Agreements" section, to house these other agreements.  My
understanding isthat the only reason other agreements has been listed in the
Master Swap Agreements Section is that they have been done so erroneously.
The drop down were not created too artfully created, allowing wrong
agreements to be put in Master Swap Agreements, which has been
proliferating.  If my understanding is not correct, than when did the
intentional use of that first section change?  I think putting all agreement
is a very bad idea.

	Sara Shackleton
	03/14/01 05:35 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

Tana:  I think the agreement is listed in Section 1 (all agreements) which is
not just Master Swap Agreements.  It is also listed in the approprate Section
13 entry.
Hope you're enjoying Canada!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: JP Morgan Securities Inc. (Electronic Order)

The above counterparty has been created in the Financial Trading Agreements
Database and is listed as a master swap agreement, and it's not.  It is an
Electronic Trading Agreement and needs to be moved down to "Other
Agreements".  Please let me know when that is done and I will delete the
entry in  the master swap agreement database.  Thanks!


I need the following information:

1)  Daily storage balances May 1, 2000 thru Sept. 26, 2000.

2)  in kind fuel charges on injections  1999, 2000

Thank you.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Review w/ Sally

Date:		2/21/2001
Time:		2:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001
10:38 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kathie Grabstald                           04/02/2001 09:04 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENSIDE Newsletter

Good Morning!

Thank you for taking time out of a busy Friday to allow our photographer to
shoot some pictures for the ENSIDE.  I will contact you when the proofs are
ready.

I have attached the article draft with revisions by Mike, Osman and Iris.
Please peruse this draft and make any changes or corrections. I need it back
for the layout team by Wednesday evening, April 4, if possible.

Regards,
Kathie Grabstald
EWS Public Relations


Daren,

The above mentioned meter is on stranger's for the entire month of Jan.
2000.  There is a deal ticket applicable to this meter from Jan. 21st thru
the 31st.  Is it o.k. for Volume Management to apply volumes from the 21st
thru the 31st to the 215?

I don't know what kind of issues was associated with this deal.

Thanks
-Jackie-

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:08
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	04/03/2000 05:00 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie, any luck on the issue w/ the gas allocated to "stranger's gas" at
this meter..........

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 02:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           04/03/2000 10:00 AM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Anita, have you found out any further information about this meter.  Encina
still beleives that we owe them for this gas.

Thanks, Stephanie (3-6004)

	Anita Luong
	03/03/2000 02:11 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie,
I see that the gas at this meter is allocated to "stranger's" in POPS.
Stephanie Gomes in Settlement thinks that this could be Encina's gas.  I see
in Sitara that deal 152638 is only valid from the 21st - 31st.   Can you
please take a look.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           03/03/2000 01:34 PM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Hey Anita,
For meter # 0986725, 1/00 production, I am showing per meter statement that
41,671mmbtu flowed.  Is that gas really Encina's.  Has the volume just not
been allocated yet.  Could you let me know  what the deal is on the meter.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


I have extended #254839.

Clem Cernosek
12/22/2000 11:11 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: HPL Meter SOUTHERN UNION - LOCKHART

Daren:

On 5/31/2000 the above meter has recorded flow of 16 Mmbtus from HPL's
pipeline.   Deal #254839 was at the meter prior, but it expired on 5/21/00.
Currently, the volume is booked to HPL Strangers Gas Contract.  Logistics
needs either (1) have Deal #254839 extended, (2) new deal, or (3) approval to
writeoff these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas.  (Please print, sign, and
return original to Clem Cernosek).

 __________________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer)

    OR

 ______________________________________________________
 Approval to Writeoff the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem


What did we do on this??

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:09 PM
To:	Robinson, Marchris; Steffes, James D.; Montovano, Steve
Subject:	FW: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

Do we have any interest in addressing this within Government Affairs?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melton, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:07 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Raker, Colleen; Soldano, Louis
Subject:	FW: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

Dear Rick:

As a follow-up to my voicemail message today just before 5PM, I am sending this email with additional details, including a track of earlier descriptive communications.

Please advise regarding the specific request for legal assistance addressing the Florida Sunshine laws.  Please let me know if you would address the request, or if we should proceed with local Florida counsel.

As additional background, Mike Nelson, VP under Phil Lowry,  is heading an initiative for security of the ETS related pipelines.  Enron Corp. security personnel are also participating as a service to ETS.

Selected communications on this matter will be held as confidential.

Thank you.

Richard Melton
Senior Counsel
ETS Legal
x52555
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Melton, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Nelson, Mike
Cc:	Soldano, Louis; Raker, Colleen
Subject:	RE: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

Dear Mike:

The email you forwarded from Rob Wilson included the following request:

	"A side item- beyond the committees interest in hearing from our security personnel, Sue has asked if  an attorney in our 	group could assist her in drafting language, if needed, to provide exemptions/protections to FL sunshine laws regarding 	security related documents."

In discussions with Lou and Colleen, we concluded that I would check with Rick Shapiro, Counsel for Legislative Affairs, to address the request.  Alternatively, we can seek assistance from local Florida counsel (e.g. Ann Longman in Tallahassee FL).

I will let you know what develops soon.

Also, I understand that Rob Wilson is Manager of Regional Governmental Affairs in Tallahassee.  He mentioned that he had a prepared presentation that he had already used. Perhaps we should consider asking him to begin routing written matters on security through you and me for the time being.  Please ask him for a copy of the presentation before the conference call.  I assume we will meet in advance of the 10/24 call too.

Thank you.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Wilson, Rob
Cc:	Johnson, David L.; Norosky, Kyle; Craig, Rick; Melton, Richard ; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	RE: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

I would like Kyle, David Johnson, Rick Craig, Richard Melton, and I to attend the conf call on the 24th. We'll figure out who can / should attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Rob
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Nelson, Mike
Cc:	Johnson, David L.; Norosky, Kyle; Craig, Rick; Melton, Richard ; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	RE: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

Mike,

Richard Hixson, House staff and Sue  Skelton, Senate staff have requested a meeting w/ our security rep. on the 24th. I suggested a conference call, since the same individual will be the presenter on the 26th. A time has not been established for the call. The conference call would include Sue, Richard , and the House and Senate chairs of each committee, Dudley Goodlette and Ginny Brown -Waite respectively. The intent would be to brief this audience on current security practices on the pipe and initiatives we are participating in w/ other stakeholders i.e. INGAA, DOE, OPS etc... In addition, the chairs want to be aware of information we do not want to share and how to manage the committee Q and A.

 I have indicated the 26th presentation will be succinct, generic, but reassuring . We can manage the Q and A  w/ some general responses regarding our efforts w/ the Florida Law Enforcement Department and heightened state of awareness responses.

 A side item- beyond the committees interest in hearing from our security personnel, Sue has asked if  an attorney in our group could assist her in drafting language, if needed, to provide exemptions/protections to FL sunshine laws regarding security related documents.

FYI- I have a presentation, I'll be using Monday w/ our PSC which includes bullet points on reliability and security, which should satisfy our needs for the 26th.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Wilson, Rob
Cc:	Johnson, David L.; Norosky, Kyle; Craig, Rick; Melton, Richard
Subject:	RE: Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

This is something we can do, but it will be at a very high level in terms of specific information shared.

I suggest we have a confernce call on this next week (or before) to 1.) determine what the Florida House and Senate is expecting, 2) who should attend, and 3.) who else is invited.

I will be out of pocket until next Monday, but could possibly call in if the timing was right.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Rob
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:53 PM
To:	Nelson, Mike
Cc:	Johnson, David L.; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	Florida Joint House and Senate Committee Hearing/ Infrastructure Security

Mike,

This morning legislative staff asked that I arrange for the appearance of an ETS security personality to address the House and Senate committees examining FL security issues. The committees tentatively plan to meet jointly on October 26th to discuss infrastructure security. There also will be a prehearing meeting on the 25th w/ committee leadership, to discuss the presentations.

The hearing schedule and agenda continues to be a work in progress as legislative members and staff prepare for a special session to begin on Monday. However, I wanted to alert you to the possibility of needing someone from your shop on at least the 26th. I have seen most everything we've produced to date regarding this issue and drafting a statement will be relatively straight forward. As is always the case, it is the committee Q and A where the practitioner is most helpful.

I will keep you informed of any developments, my contact numbers are 850-350-5018 office;  850-544-6938 cell; 850-668-2782 home

Rob


Your packages for the Enron Center Garage are ready for pick-up at EB305,
please make sure that you bring your Allen Center/Met card with you at the
time of pick-up, we will exchange your access card for a transponder.

Thank You,
DeShonda


Unsubscribe at  bottom[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       Click  here to download RealArcade.    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Experience  the Internet's first personal game arcade!    [IMAGE]     Discover  the best games in every category and genre    [IMAGE]     Acquire  games easily and reliably    [IMAGE]       Play  games with greater ease and knowledge  [IMAGE]       Click  here to download RealArcade.
 remove  me                    privacy  policy       You are receiving this e-mail because you  downloaded RealPlayer(R) or RealJukebox(R) from Real.com(TM) and indicated  a preference to receive product news, updates, and special offers from  RealNetworks(R). If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the  future, click on the "remove me" link above.    RealPlayer(R), RealJukebox(R), Real.com(TM),  RealArcade(TM) and RealNetworks(R) are trademarks or registered trademarks  of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein  are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


DOES NOT COST A THING TO SEE YOUR FAVORITE  SITES
GET INSTANT ACCESS WITHOUT PAYING A THING

COME SEE YOUNG TEEN SLUTS GET HARDCORE AND NASTY
http://65.119.83.82/freejoins22/lnt1.html

HERE ARE YOUR FAVORITE CELEBS GETTING BENT OVER AND SLAMMED
http://65.119.83.82/freejoins22/celeb1.html

HOT ATHLETIC BABES SPORT FxxxxxG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://65.119.83.82/freejoins22/hcs1.html

Cum see these WOMEN PLAY at the ZOO
http://65.119.83.82/freejoins22/lz1.html

ABSOLUTELY NO MONEY AT ALL

This site contains things Mormens and Bible thumpers dont want to see. If
you are not old enough (18 years or older) and you mommy and daddy are not
around close this immediately so you dont get spanked!!!!!!

Do not reply to this e-mail message

To be taken off this list please go to the link below and enter your e-mail
address.
"Under Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress this letter
cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender includes contact
information and a method of removal."
WE HONOR ALL REMOVES. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE EMAIL AT A TIME OTHERWISE YOU WILL
NOT BE REMOVED. PROFANITY SERVES NO PURPOSE.

Please allow up to five days to be removed from this list.

http://65.119.83.82/remove.html


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
08:38 AM ---------------------------

taylorci@pjm.com on 08/31/2000 03:29:14 PM
Please respond to taylorci@pjm.com
To: pjm-customer-info@risc1.pjm.com
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: FW: Press Release - Testimony of PJM President to the Pennsylvani a
PUC

Message sent from the pjm-customer-info mailing list at
pjm-customer-info@majordomo.pjm.com:

> The following press release was issued today:
>
> PJM EXECUTIVE DESCRIBES SUCCESS
> OF POWER GRID IN MID-ATLANTIC REGION
>
> (HARRISBURG, Pa. Aug. 31, 2000) - Phillip Harris, Chairman and CEO of PJM
> Interconnection, LLC, North America's largest centrally-dispatched
electrical
> system, testified before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission this
week
> on the reliability and affordability of electricity in the state.
>
> PJM, which became the first fully operational Independent System Operator in
> the U.S. on January 1, 1998 is responsible for the reliability of the bulk
> power transmission system and to facilitate an open, competitive wholesale
> electric market.
>
> PJM is responsible for coordinating the transmission of more than 58,000
> Megawatts of electricity over 8,000 miles of power lines it uses to get
power
> from 540 generating stations to more than 24 million customers.
>
> The Interconnection serves 8 percent of the country's population, which is
> spread throughout the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware and
> northern Virginia region. PJM is the third largest entity of its kind in the
> world, behind Tokyo Electric and France's grid-the whole country.
>
> PJM's duties also entail administration of the energy market, which now
takes
> place over the Internet. The commodities-like exchange is facilitated by
PJM's
> custom-built eBusiness tools. Technological and process innovation have
> enabled PJM to manage more than $4 billion in the energy market in the past
> three years, achieve a 96 percent customer approval rating and has secured
the
> reliability of grid through peak demand days.
>
>  In his testimony, Harris outlined the underlying principles of why PJM has
> been successful in the new energy marketplace:
>
>
> -more-
> 2/3
>
> Transition Process
>
> Moving from a government regulated entity to a deregulated market model is a
> complicated process. PJM took an incremental and methodical approach to
> deregulation by taking measured steps and evaluating the results of the
> transition after each step to ensure reliability of the existing services.
> What is now a five-market system, began with a single market and was phased
in
> over two years.
>
> Governance Model
>
> To ensure fairness in the market, PJM chartered a two-tier governance model
> that includes a fully independent board that is supported by advice from a
> Members Committee.
> The model provides a forum for member debate and a process to develop
> collaborative solutions. PJM's more than 200 members as well as stakeholders
> can have a voice and confidence that change to business rules will occur
> fairly, collaboratively, and efficiently.
>
> Power Exchange Function
> The success of the PJM Power Pool and the continued combination of the
> reliability and market functions within the new PJM ISO were the most
> efficient and cost effective transition to the future.
>
> The connection of both functions within one organization, that is
financially
> independent of both transmission and generation facilities, system
> modifications and market innovations required to assure reliability can move
> forward quickly and efficiently, without artificial barriers to
> implementation.
>
> Long-Term Reliability
>
> The reliability of the grid and the market is dependent upon the free flow
of
> information to PJM members and stakeholders.
> Using tools like the eData application, PJM members can view Real Time
Energy
> Market prices on public Internet pages every five minutes for approximately
> 2,000 hubs, zones, and significant locations throughout the PJM region. The
> information-rich environment has initially drawn the interest of 30,000
> additional Megawatts of capacity to join the PJM region, which translates
into
> greater reliability.
>
> -more-
> 3/3
>
> Transmission Expansion Process
>
> PJM is increasing the services it provides to the growing economy and the
> population. Competition, growth and reliability of the market and grid is
> further aided by a well-planned, FERC-approved expansion process that
> anticipates an additional 15,000 Megawatts added to the PJM region over the
> next five years.
> An additional 20,000 Megawatts are planned to be added in the future,
ensuring
> an abundant pool of power to meet increasing demand.
>
> Collaborative Process
>
> The innovative two-tier governance for PJM and management of the grid and
> market includes all stakeholders, regulators and traders and provides a
forum
> other groups to be part collective collaborative membership process.
>
> Needs of the Customer
>
> PJM is attentive to making the system responsive to the changing needs of
the
> customer. New internet-based tools and five different markets provide PJM
> members with flexibility to create a portfolio of transactions to best suit
> their dynamic needs.
>
> The eSuite of tools (eFTR, eDocuments, eSchedules, eCapacity, eData) and PJM
> Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS) empower members and
> stakeholders with the information they need to make informed decisions about
> their power needs and policies.
>
> These tools provide the public with valuable information such as market
> pricing, daily load, transmission system information and much more. The
> openness of the information exchange ensures fair conduct of the market.
>
> Continuous Improvement
>
> Innovation is the key to successfully managing the diverse interests of
PJM's
> rapidly increasing membership. Additional Internet tools are in development
to
> support its evolving role as an Independent System Operator.
>
> More information on PJM and the energy market can be found at PJM's website:
> www.pjm.com
>
>
> ###
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Cynthia Taylor
> Manager, Customer Relations and Training
> PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
>

Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. If you have a question for PJM Customer
Relations and Training, please send an e-mail to custsvc@pjm.com.

To unsubscribe from this list, send an e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pjm.com
containing only the following line in the body of the e-mail:

unsubscribe pjm-customer-info


The credit worksheet


456-92-6014

9700 Bissonnet, Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77036
713-596-1800
713-271-2166 fax

11/09/53...just in case


Pat:  Out co # is 0413, RC # is 107043.  Please deliver them to EB 19C2.
Also, please let me know when they are going to be delivered as we have to
unload the lateral file cabinets that are currently in that room.  Will the
men who deliver the Times 2 Units remove the lateral files?  Thanks.  Anita


At approximately 6:30 pm on 4/25 Ruth Ashe with PGE notified Enron that there
will be a voice mail outage starting the evening of 4/25 and running thru 2pm
on 4/26.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact her at
503-464-8663 or 503-323-1254.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


Please read the following attachment:

Thank you,

Kathy Benedict


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:23
AM ---------------------------

Dan Junek
12/23/99 01:31 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Junek/HOU/ECT on 12/23/99 01:30 PM
---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/23/99 12:33:16 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, "        -         *germany, Chris"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc:
Subject: REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/23/99
12:39 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 12:11 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED - January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Please note in red the revised volumes
---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/23/99
01:10 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/23/99 11:05 AM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Nancy
Diel/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Tennessee deliveries to WKY

Per the sales reps and GMS I will need the following:

100 dth per day to meter # 020030
596 dth per day to meter # 020028

I will receive a final number for these next week but this is an estimate.
(should not be that far off).


Dear Derivatives Week subscriber:

Catch the latest breaking news in this week's issue by clicking
here: http://www.derivativesweek.com

Top stories this week:
_________________________

At this year's International Swaps and Derivatives Association
meeting, which drew the largest crowd ever, Internet and e-commerce
issues were on everybody's mind and crept into most presentations
and discussions.

Leading U.S. banking agencies have proposed changes to their
risk-based capital rules to address the exposure of banks, bank holding
companies? and thrifts to credit risk. The paper proposes, among other
things, that credit derivatives be included in the definitions of credit risk
arising from securitizations and that the capital charge be based on the
credit rating of the underlying obligation.

Merrill Lynch is reorganizing its global debt group and recently appointed
Dow Kim to a new position as head of the newly formed integrated global
enterprise solutions group. The move is meant to integrate the bank's
previously less centralized derivatives businesses.

Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co., the South Korea ship
building and construction giant, is considering its first use of U.S.
dollar/Korean won currency options and interest-rate swaps.

_________________________

As a DW subscriber, you are eligible for complimentary access to the
Subscribers Only area of the <www.derivativesweek.com> site, which
contains the current issue and a searchable archive of all past issues.
Use your User ID and Password to access the entire site. If you don't
have these yet, hit 'REPLY' to this email, fill out the proper information
below, and send it back to me. I'll get you set up right away!

===============================

Newsletter Title:
My name is:
My company is:
My city location is:

I choose my new user name to be:
I choose my new password to be:

===============================
?
If you'd prefer, call our Customer Service Department at 212-224-3800
and give them the information above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL
USE ONLY.? THEY MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANYONE AND
NO ONE ELSE SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE WITH YOUR USER NAME
AND PASSWORD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 1-212-224-3034.

Thanks and enjoy this week's issue.

Jim Beecher
Publisher

NOTE: You will receive weekly updates of the hottest stories in
Derivatives Week. These are not random mass mailings but
rather one-time messages for your personal attention. If you do
not wish to continue to receive these notices, please click 'reply',
type 'remove' and enter your name and company. You will then
be removed from our email database.


I concur

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pierce, Shelly
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Acevedo, Felecia
Subject:	Salary Adjustment

Steve -

Hello.  Based on a conversation with John Brindle today, he indicated that he had discussed a base salary increase to Kyle Norosky's salary from $96,375 to $101,375.  If you agree with this increase, could you please reply to this e-mail indicating your concurrence.

Once we receive the e-mail indicating your approval, we will process this increase for Kyle.

If you should have any questions or require additional information, please let me know.

Thank you Steve,
Shelly
X57962


Carlos,

Having some difficulty finding another job?

Happy Anniversary.  Sorry I wasn't here to take you to lunch.

Kay


Interesting article.  Thought you might enjoy it.

glen

 http://www.msnbc.com/news/718437.asp


We seem to missing the termination agreement.  I'll check with Brian.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 02:07
PM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/20/2000 02:00 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com,
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Vitro

Kay, John & Jeff:

Final files of the Onshore Contract, Offshore Contract and Consolication
Agreement


----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 11:07 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:44 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

I had his name on my original list, but I must have accidentally deleted it
when I was putting in another name.  Sorry.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:43 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Mike Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:41 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:10 AM

		 To: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, bill.williams@enron.com
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

Attached please find the above-reference document and attachments.


Thanks!

	Stephanie Sever
	01/29/2001 11:55 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Trafigura AG

Done! - no users and already closed for finiancials.

Thanks,
Stephanie

From: Tana Jones on 01/29/2001 10:55 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trafigura AG

Please shut down the above counterparty from trading all financial products.
They are no longer an ESP.


I know that you do not need numbers until late next month, but I thought you
might want an early look at May.

One number is particularly interesting: VaR for the Total Return Swaps.  You
will notice that it decreased substantially from about $20 million in March
to about $8 million in May.  We had several deals that expired (Churchill,
Piti Guam, and Blackbird), reducing risk,  and only one new one (Motown).
Most importantly, we cut back on our exposure to Rhythms from 5.4 million
shares in April to 4.7 million in May, and the stock price continued to fall
from $36 to $21 to $16 per share (the less the investment is worth, the less
we can lose in it).

We will send you June numbers as we collect them.

Regards,

Eugenio


Any way you think Andrew might like power trading?  His resume looks strong.


Matt,

Make sure this is included in your long term forecast.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca
Sent:	Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Allen, Phillip K.; Tholt, Jane M.; Comnes, Alan; Nicolay, Christi; Perrino, Dave; Black, Don; Fulton, Donna; Sharp, Greg; Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Lawner, Leslie; Courtney, Mark; Kaufman, Paul; Alvarez, Ray; Frank, Robert; Gahn, Scott; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan
Subject:	El Paso Announces Binding Open Season for Additional Capacity on Line 2000

Also posted today on El Paso's web site.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2001 02:14 PM ---------------------------

"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com <mailto:tbradley@bracepatt.com>> on 07/10/2001 02:10:18 PM
To:	<jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com <mailto:jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com>>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com <mailto:cshoneman@bracepatt.com>>, "Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com <mailto:rrich@bracepatt.com>>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com <mailto:rreilley@coral-energy.com>>, <Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com <mailto:Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com>>
cc:

Subject:	El Paso Announces Binding Open Season for Additional Capacity	on Line 2000

FYI

Tuesday July 10, 9:21 am Eastern Time

Press Release
SOURCE: El Paso Corporation

El Paso Announces Binding Open Season for Additional Capacity on Line 2000

HOUSTON, July 10 /PRNewswire/ -- El Paso Natural Gas Company, a subsidiary of El Paso Corporation (NYSE: EPG - news), announced today a binding open season for 320 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of pipeline capacity from the Keystone and Waha areas of the Permian Basin in West Texas to the California border near Ehrenberg, Arizona. The binding open season, which began July 5, 2001 and closes on August 2, 2001, is in response to the interest expressed during El Paso's non-binding open season in March 2001 soliciting shippers for potential system expansions.

The expansion capacity will be made available by adding compression to El Paso's Line 2000 from McCamey, Texas to the California border near Ehrenberg, Arizona. The expansion capacity will be sold at El Paso's existing maximum California tariff rate, and the fuel charge is estimated to be 5 percent. The projected in-service date of the expansion facilities is mid-2003 subject to the receipt of all necessary regulatory, environmental, and right-of-way authorizations.

The receipt points on El Paso's system for this capacity will be the Waha and Keystone pools in the Permian Basin area of West Texas. The delivery points will be Southern California Gas Company (SoCal) and PG&E's proposed North Baja Pipeline, El Paso's bi-directional lateral (Line 1903), any future incremental capacity on the SoCal system from Ehrenberg, Arizona into the State of California, and any upstream points on El Paso's south mainline system where capacity exists.

``This system expansion will add incremental interstate capacity to California, Arizona, New Mexico, and West Texas to meet increasing natural gas demands including the demand for natural gas to generate electricity for the western United States,'' said Patricia A. Shelton, president of El Paso Natural Gas Company.

Interested parties can contact their transportation marketing representative or Mr. Jerry W. Strange at (719) 520-4687.

El Paso Corporation is committed to meeting energy needs throughout North America and the world with operations that span the energy value chain from wellhead to electron. The company is focused on speeding the development of new technologies, such as clean coal and liquefied natural gas, to address critical energy shortages across the globe. Visit El Paso at www.elpaso.com <http://www.elpaso.com>.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release includes forward-looking statements and projections, made in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and assumptions on which these statements and projections are based are current, reasonable, and complete. However, a variety of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this release. While the company makes these statements and projections in good faith, neither the company nor its management can guarantee that the anticipated future results will be achieved. Reference should be made to the company's (and its affiliates') Securities and Exchange Commission filings for additional important factors that may affect actual results.

SOURCE: El Paso Corporation


Michael Lassle is in charge of our lighting best-practices. He is the person
Mr. Eaton should contact.  Michael is in Houston and his number is
(713) 853-5023.

Osman

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
02/17/2000 07:55 AM
To: "William Eaton" <enernet@hicom.net>
cc: Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: NJ Alliance

Bill,

I forwarded your message to my associate, Osman Sezgen, who supports our
Energy Services group. He will E-mail you the name of a contact at
Enron.

Vince Kaminski

"William Eaton" <enernet@hicom.net> on 02/16/2000 08:25:02 PM
To: shelm@globalcloud.net
cc: steing@conedsolutions.com, robert.blake@conectiv.com,
marianne.abdul@conectiv.com, bekmank@conedenergy.com, David L
Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, robinsonm@conedenergy.com, nwilson@delmarva.com,
hudsonw@detroitedison.com, cndavis@duke-energy.com,
hbburnham@duke-energy.com, jhickman@duke-energy.com,
paul.skurdahl@engageenergy.com, James Mackey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, mrollhei@enron.com, hnmorris@metromediaenergy.com,
npalmer@execpc.com, chibbard@noresco.com, mhuang@usgen.com,
bshay@powerdirect.com, cmidura@pseg.com, ghallam@energy.twc.com
Subject: NJ Alliance

AESP members and utility affiliates,
We are looking for a good fit with one of the utilities intent on doing
business in the NJ, CT, PA, NY territory. Our qualifications and company
profile may be previewed at our web site, www.lightsourceonline.com. Email
contact information in response to this message.
Thanks,
Bill Eaton

 - att1.htm


yes!  also need to do something on email w/ more info (from the press release)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:25 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Cc:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:

Voicemail from Ken?

 << File: 102401vcml.doc >>


Chris -

I haven't received a copy of the filing yet but will get it to you as soon as I receive it.  Rates will not be posted until approved which could be by early next week even though the new rates don't go into effect until January 2002.

I sent info. on Wmeco in an earlier e-mail. Any questions, give me a call.

Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hendrix, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:05 PM
To:	Rishe, Frank
Cc:	Hidalgo, Alex; Steffes, James D.; Taveras, Ignacio
Subject:	NSTAR Std. Offer / Default Rates

In the press releases I saw that NSTAR filed yesterday (10/15) with the DTE to decrease rates.  I have checked both the DTE and NSSTAR website but they are not posted yet.  I would like to get a copy of the NSTAR filing as soon as possible.  Enron Direct is anxious to determine the level of decrease so we can assess our product viability.

In addition, have you heard anything regarding WMECO making a filing to lower their rates.

Thanks,

Chris


Rick has scheduled a  meeting for Thursday, February 15 to discuss the
national campaign around California.  The meeting will take place in Houston,
TX. and at the moment, I am in the process of locating a meeting space, but I
wanted each of you to be aware of this meeting so you could block your
calendar.  The meeting will begin at 11:30am (CST) and conclude by 3:30pm
(CST).  If for any reason you are unable to attend this meeting, please
inform Rick via e:mail or v:mail.

I will keep everyone apprised of the meeting location and please feel free to
call me if you have any questions.

I would also like to request confirmation of your attendance and if overnight
accommodations are needed, please let me know that as well.

gngr
713-853-7751


Grant,
 I have reviewed your requested changes and have made the changes which do
not require explanation or clarification.  Those changes are reflected in the
above document.  Let me go over your list of items:
 1. I have deleted the word "DRAFT".
 2. I have left a blank for the date within the month of March 2001 when the
contract would be executed by the City.
 3. I have changed the word "may" to "shall".
 4. Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity does not fit in a Deficiency
Default, it is just the maximum quantity that can be handled by a party at a
particular point.  I do not think their is an omission.
 5. I have added the word "reasonable".
 6. The procedue for how the Termination Payment is determined is provided,
if the City disagrees with the method and values provided in the statement
and is unable to convince the Company to revise, the statement, then the
issue is to be resolved in arbitration.  At the point that a Termination
Payment calculation is necessary, a long drawn out period should not be
necessary to attain closure.
 7. We need to limit the duration to 30 days,  neither party should be
required to wait 60 days before it could accelerate the other party's
obligations under the Contract.  We might be able to add language to extend
the period if we had some documentation stating the steps that a party was
pursuing to cause the proceeding to be dismissed and the other party was
otherwise kept whole from a credit exposure.
 8. I have kept the 30 days because 5 days is too short a period.  During a
holiday period, one scheduling error could cover the entire period.  Article
3 has language which provides a remedy for a party if a scheduling default
extends for more than 5 days during any month.
 9. The reason is because Enron Corp. is the rated entity and no separate
rating applies to ENA.
 10. I have changed "a" to "the"
 11. I have eliminated the  60 day limitation on the duration of an event of
Force Majeure.
 12. This merely addressed the possibility of a imbalance amount being due
when a pipeline aggregates imbalances using multiple points, and the language
would allocated the payment based on the amount of the imbalance that a
particular party may have caused.  I think the language is clear as written.
 13. The definition of Act was one of the items that I had requested that you
review and complete as necessary so that all appropriate statutes were
referenced.  I am still waiting for your language.  I started filling it in
using language that had been provided by the City.
 14. I added the word "reasonable".
 15. I have made the requested change relating to GAAAP.
 16. This is a late payment provision and as such a believe that the
provision should be more than a party's rating, as such I have kept the 2%
over prime language.
 17. These amounts were determined by the credit group and any change needs
to be discussed with that group.  BBB-  is considered investment grade and I
understand that Enron Corp.'s rating is BBB.  ENA is not a rated entity and
that is why the language relates to Enron Corp.'s rating.
 18. The elimination of the opinion of counsel did not change the
requirements relating to the representations that we expect the City to have
made.  If the City cannot make these representations, then we need to know
that before we execute the Contract.
 19. I have added the word "reasonable".
 20. The party that has the Transport Agreement with the Transporter should
have the legal right to obtain the information based on its contract.
 21. It is our position that any dispute be arbitrated.  We can agree to
meditation if we can make the outcome binding on the parties.  I am willing
to discuss any changed language that you might care to offer.
 22. We have found that personnel of both our Company and that of our
Customers change so rapidily that the list is not workable and merely allows
a party to back out of transactions it does not like on the basis that the
person who agreed to such transaction was not on the list.  Therefore , we
object to any listing of approved parties who can transact.  We believe that
each party should be responsible for the actions of its employees and should
stand behind any transactions that those parties may enter into pursuant to
the terms and provisions of the Contract.

 I will be out of the office on Friday, but will be in all next week if you
care to discuss any of these matters.

	"Kolling, Grant" <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
	03/02/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Kolling, Grant"
<grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
		 cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

 <<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

Dan:

First, I've attached the proposed resolution which authorizes the City
Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

More importantly, I need to inform you that our senior management has
reviewed the referenced contract; I have been asked to present additional
changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration and to raise questions
about certain of its terms and conditions.

Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and proceed to the end of the
exhibits.

1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of the Enfolio agreement which
should be deleted.

2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not contain the words "1st of
January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until the parties have signed the
contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach as of the date it signs the
contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires the City to proffer the
to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City (Customer) wants Enron
(Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic Transaction, as defined.
Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should be changed to "shall."

4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first sentence:   Buyer's Requested
Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's failure to Schedule the
Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a Seller's Deficiency Default.
How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity fit into a Seller's
Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested Quantity does not include a
Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is the reason for the omission?

5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line 23 refers to "reasonable
attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys' fees."  To be internally
consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable attorneys' fees."

6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A statement showing the
determination of the Termination Payment will be prepared.  It's unclear
whether the City is entitled to review and challenge the determination
before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The City should be entitled to
receive a copy of the determination and to question it before it is
obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please clarify, or permit the
City to exercise these rights.

7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering Event will exist if a
bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.  Is this (under
bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within which one may seek
dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer to the 11 USC section that
backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30 days" to "5 days."  The City
is concerned with the number of days that Enron may be permitted to fail to
Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by Enron.

9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a default by Enron Corp.
(ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's default in this regard?
Please explain.

10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed to refer to "the Company"
?

11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the force majeure provision
as drafted.  It states that the parties must perform even if a FM event
(earthquake) would prevent either or both parties from performing with the
60-day period stated therein.  There is no such limitation under California
law in the absence of a contract provision to the contrary.

12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron translate the last sentence?  We
don't understand it.

13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why Section 3 is referred to?

14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees.

 15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles, consistently applied, with respect to Company, and
governmental generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied,
with respect to Customer."

16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete "two percent over".  The
City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City believes the 2% over prime
should not apply to it.

17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What does Enron believe the
City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million threshold is mentioned.  Also,
what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an investment grade rating?

18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we have agreed that the
opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps and warranties are being
deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties" is nevertheless included
in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted, because the City has not
undertaken a court search as is our custom and practice whenever we issue an
opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is not ... Party."

19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add "reasonable" before
"attorneys' fees."

20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by "to the extent it has a
legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We do not as a matter of legal
policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate disputes.  Is Enron
amenable to mediation?  This process is less formal and less costly in my
opinion.

22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like the Agreement to include
a list of employees for Company and Customer who are authorized to trade on
behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be added to this section to
this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as an Exhibit C.

Thank you so much for considering these issues.  There are others which I
hope to receive from staff next week and which I will forward to you for
response.

Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be out of town after today
until Wednesday, March 7.

Sincerely,

Grant Kolling
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:16 AM
  To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
  Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
  Subject: Re:  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

   << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
  (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

  Grant,
       I have incorporated the language you provided to me in
the attached
  document.  I have been informed by the Corporate Secretary's
office that
  they will issue a Certificate of Incumbency showing that the
person
  executing the contract for ENA is authorized to execute
contracts for ENA.
  No other party signs as to form or terms, however, the
officer executing
  for ENA will require that the deal person and I initial on
the line next to
  his signature.  I have reviewed the proposed draft
resolution.  ENA will
  accept the enacted resolution and will not require that the
City Attorney
  issue an opinion.  If the attached contract is acceptable,
please print off
  2 originals, have them approved, signed and forward to me
for ENA's
  approval and signature.  Once the contract is fully
executed, I will return
  one fully executed original to you for the City's file.

 - 0071988 RESO Enron.doc


The enclosed research report is being sent to you from PaineWebber by:

 Emery Financial Group

 713-957-7020

 rocky.emery@PaineWebber.COM

Please contact them if you have any questions or would like to discuss this
material.

The information contained in the attached research report is believed to be
reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.  PaineWebber Incorporated
and/or Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management Inc., affiliated companies and/or
their officers, directors, employees or stockholders may at times have a
position, including an arbitrage position, in the securities described herein
and may sell or buy them to or from customers.  These companies may from time
to time act as a consultant to a company being reported upon.

You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this document.  If you don't
already have it just click on this link,
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html, and follow the
on-screen instructions.  The Acrobat Reader is free of charge.

 - P004380220001120D03.pdf


Steve,

OK. Please, send Shirley the  distribution list (names, E-mail addresses,
etc.).

Vince

Steven Leppard
09/20/2000 11:08 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Thanks Vince.  I'll make the reservation, then send Shirley the details to
issue an invite to us all.

Steve

Vince J Kaminski
09/20/2000 05:10 PM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re:

Steve,

I shall talk to John Sherriff about such issues. My intention
is to vest you with maximum decision making powers. It makes most sense to
me to make decisions where the information resides.

Please, invite Anjam or alternatively make reservations for dinner and
let Shirley know. Shirley can send an invitation to everybody  in the group
on my behalf. It would be really bad to exclude Anjam from the dinner.

It

Vince

Steven Leppard
09/20/2000 10:30 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Thanks Vince.

Dinner on Sunday OK all round.  Do you want Anjam along too? I can't really
ask him, given our current relationship.

One other thing, have you had thoughts on reporting lines, who signs
expenses, etc. etc., or are these issues to be resolved when you come over?

Cheers,
Steve

Vince J Kaminski
09/20/2000 04:14 PM
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:

Steve,

Steve, this is the spreadsheet.

Also, please, let Shirley know if the dinner on Sun is OK.

Vince


Mara, pls put together a summary report of the planned generation sites along Kern Pipeline and the proposed start dates. I need it for a discussion with Sierra Pacific today.

BT


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 12:08 PM
---------------------------

"Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com> on 08/31/2000 03:34:13 AM
To: a_diekman@hotmail.com, chris_a_regnier@yahoo.com, John9375@aol.com,
CHMARGAU@aol.com, srhea@acm.org, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Professional Quiz

>From: "Christine Lane" <cll@prodigy.net>
>To: "brett lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Fw: Professional Quiz
>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 18:42:05 -0000
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Diane Zarembo <diane@harrisonpersonnel.com>
>To: Micah Gartman <bingham@pdq.net>; Chris Lane <cll@prodigy.net>; Lauren
>Lawler <l.lawler@mail.utexas.edu>; Chris Bell
><chris@harrisonpersonnel.com>;
>Christy Kersh <christy@harrisonpersonnel.com>
>Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 6:10 PM
>Subject: Fw: Professional Quiz
>
>
> > This has absolutely just made my day! Check it out---it's great!  It was
> > sent to me by a manager at St. Luke's Hospital that I work with.
> >
> > Diane Zarembo
> > Harrison Personnel
> > (713) 960-9906, ext. 112
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Davies" <zdxd02@sleh.com>
> > To: <lenamaris@aol.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 8:27 AM
> > Subject: Professional Quiz
> >
> >
> > The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and tells whether you
>are
> > qualified to be a "professional".  Scroll down for each answer.
> >
> > The questions are not that difficult.
> >
> > 1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The correct answer is:
> > Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe and close the door.
> > This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in
> > an overly complicated way.
> >
> > 2. How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Wrong Answer:
> > Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant and close the refrigerator.
> >
> > Correct Answer:
> > Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant
> > and close the door.  This tests your ability to think through
> > the repercussions of your actions.
> >
> > 3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference.  All the animals
>attend
> > except one.  Which animal does not attend?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Correct Answer:
> > The Elephant. The Elephant is in the refrigerator.  This tests your
> > memory.
> >
> > OK, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you
> > still have one more chance to show your abilities.
> >
> > 4. There is a river you must cross. But it is inhabited by crocodiles.
>How
> > do you manage to cross it?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Correct Answer:
> > You swim across. All the Crocodiles are attending the Animal
> > Meeting. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.
> >
> > According to Andersen Consulting Worldwide, around 90% of the
>professionals
> > they tested got all questions wrong.
> >
> > But many preschoolers got several correct answers.  Anderson Consulting
>says
> > this conclusively disproves the theory that most professionals have the
> > brains of a four year old.
> >
> >
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


When you guys do loss return deals like this one with PGE, could you include
a note in the comments section regarding the zero price and "no confirm"
status? The Confirms group in Houston has requested some kind of comment in
these deals so they don't try to track down a price or confirm the deal.

Thanks,
Kate


FYI Energy Committee Members:

PG&E is hosting its fifth stakeholders meeting for the 2001 PG&E
Transmission Expansion Plan on September 17 and 18, 2001 in San Francisco,
CA.  The purpose of this meeting is to present the study group with the
draft 2001 expansion plan.  The fifth stakeholder meeting has been divided
into two days:  Sept. 17 to present Bay Area Plans and Sept 18 to present
non-Bay Area Plans.

Date:        Monday , Sept 17, 2001
Subject:    Stakeholders Meeting #5 - "PG&E 2001 Electric Grid Expansion
Plan - Bay Area Plans"
Time:        10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Location:   77 Beale Street, Conference Room 308
                 San Francisco, CA   94177

Date:        Monday , Sept 18, 2001
Subject:    Stakeholders Meeting #5 - "PG&E 2001 Electric Grid Expansion
Plan - Non-Bay Area Plans"
Time:        10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Location:   77 Beale Street, Conference Room 308
                 San Francisco, CA   94177

In order to ensure enough handouts please email or call your RSVP to Ledy
Torres (dst2@pge.com or  415-973-1392) by Monday, September 10, 2001.  If
you have any additional questions about this meeting, please contact Mark
Esguerra (pme8@pge.com or 415-973-4380).  An agenda and handouts will be
sent out soon.

Regards,
Mark Esguerra
PG&E-Electric Transmission Planning
Mail Code N3B
P.O. Box 770000
San Francisco, CA  94177

Email:   pme8@pge.com
Phone:   415-973-4380


John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 11:20 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: California ABX1-1

Ginger:

Could you please forward this to the participants of the daily California
Conference call?

Thanks

John
----- Forwarded by John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/02/2001 11:20 AM -----


Norton SystemWorks 2002 Professional Edition   Get it Today for 90%
Off the Combined Retail Value!      The complete problem-solving suite
for home users and small businesses. It protects your PC against virus
threats, optimizes performance, cleans out Internet clutter, provides
quick and easy system recovery, clones and upgrades computers, and sends
and receives faxes.       =20
      Click here for
=20
on this exciting offer!       This featured-packed suite of products
includes:   =20
• Norton AntiVirus™ protects your PC from virus threats
• Norton Utilities™ optimizes PC performance & solves
problems
• Norton CleanSweep™ cleans out Internet clutter
• Norton Ghost™ clones and upgrades your system easily
• GoBack=AE by Roxio™ provides quick and easy system
recovery
• WinFax Basic™ sends and receives professional-looking
faxes
         A $300+ Combined Retail Value for Only...
=20
FREE SHIPPING! *        This offer is limited to stock on hand, so hurry
before they're gone!      * Free shipping applies to Standard Shipping
only. Priority Shipping available for an additional fee.          =20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   =20
Our products are usually shipped in an attractive, sturdy plastic
storage case instead
of retail boxes or jewel cases. Product pictures shown are for display
purposes only.
   =20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        =20
--=20

To unsubscribe go to=20
http://em5000.net/unsub.php?client=3Dspecialdeals&email=3Dplucci@ect.enron.=
com&msgid=3D29120100018
or to=20
http://em5000.net/unsub.php?client=3Dspecialdeals&msgid=3D29120100018
and enter your email address (plucci@ect.enron.com)=20


thanks


FYI,  I expect to be on vacation that week.

Kay

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 04:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Construction Schedule - Office Moves

I think your "final" office changed when your group changed - the East
Origination/Gas Trading Group is in the southeast quadrant of the floor and
they have given you 3882, just  four doors down the hall from where I am
now.  The construction workers are gone for the day if you want to stop by
and see it.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/10/2000 03:07 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Construction Schedule - Office Moves

Hi Mark,

I thought I was in my "final" office.  Where am I moving?

Kay

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 02:25 PM
To: Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect,
Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Construction Schedule - Office Moves

Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The current phase
of the office construction process is almost finished.  We have been given a
completion date when (we hope) your new office will be ready of Monday,
November 20.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.


Please note that your employees have suggested the following people to
complete a feedback form on their behalf.  You will need to access the
Performance Management System (PEP) to either approve or decline these
suggested reviewers.  Once you have approved the suggested reviewers they
will be notified and can begin completing the feedback form.

Your list of employees that have suggested reviewers are listed below:

Date suggested: Jun 09, 2000
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name: ROBERTS, MICHAEL A


Thanks

Subject to the optional "marketing information" questions, which I will
remove, is this the final version, which we are all happy with ?

Rgds
David

Edmund Cooper
23/07/99 13:38
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, David Port/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Customer Registration Form

David(s),

Here is a revised Registration Form incorporating London Legal's comments.

If you have any queries please contact Justin or myself.

Regards, Edmund.

Justin Boyd
07/23/99 11:33 AM
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Customer Registration Form

Ed - here it is........

J

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 23/07/99 11:33
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
21/07/99 16:37
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: New Customer Registration Form

Has this been approved by Houston's credit team?

David Weekes
21/07/99 16:36
To: David Port/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Customer Registration Form

David

I have attached a redraft of the Registration Form.  You will see that we
have amended the Credit Requirements section and have also made some
suggested additions to the Legal Requirements section which Justin should
review.

Please call with any comments or questions.

Regards

David


FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
11/16/2000 09:16 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SHORELINE GAS INC., BUHLER CENTRAL POINT

Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty    Meter   Volumes  Price    Period  Global no.
Shoreline Gas, Inc.    9860   1,000mmbtu/d  100% Gas Daily less $0.16 10/4 -
10/31 96052055
           100% IF/HSC less $0.16 11/1 - 11/30 96052055

FYI, Susan will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of December.
Additionally, this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353

---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
03:15 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Esther Buckley                           11/08/2000 02:20 PM

To: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne E
Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey Austin/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne
Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SHORELINE GAS INC., BUHLER CENTRAL POINT

Please see attached file for the turn on.


I believe our new Tennessee rep is Sherry Glazebrook at 832-676-2635.  If she's no longer there then call Andy Armstrong in the bid room and he will find out who our rep is.  His number is 832-676-5120.  Anyone that answers the phone in the bid room should be able to tell us how our rep is.

Our rep at Iroquois is Robin Zaleski at 203-925-7274.


Stan has determined NOT to have a Half Day Staff Meeting at this time.  Our next one is scheduled for Wednesday, December 12, from 8:30AM to 1:00PM in 49C2 video conference room.  Please mark your calendars.

Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel:   713/853-6197
Fax:  713/345-7047
Cindy.Stark@enron.com


FYI.  The weekend of the 9th/10th is definitely out for me.  I'm sorry, honey.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/28/2000 04:05 PM -----

	"Jonathan Berk" <berk@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
	09/28/2000 04:01 PM
	Please respond to berk

		 To: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Class Final

Jeff ---

I would rather you not.  My policy on these matters goes something like
this. If you have a valid reason like you are out of town on business, then
you can take the exam by fax as close to the actual time as possible,
certainly on the same day.

--- Jonathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:34 PM
> To: berk@haas.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Class Final
>
>
> Greetings Professor:
>
> Apologies for asking, but something has come up and I wanted to inquire
> about the chances of taking the E203 final on a day other than Sunday the
> 10th of December.  Preferably Tu, W, Th, the week of the 11th.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff
Cardiff/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on 11/10/2000 02:08 PM
---------------------------

"Edling, Andy" <Andy_Edling@kindermorgan.com> on 11/10/2000 12:18:06 PM

To:   "'jjcardiff@duke-energy.com'" <jjcardiff@duke-energy.com>,
      "'reason@duke-energy.com'" <reason@duke-energy.com>,
      "'medling@msrn.com'" <medling@msrn.com>
cc:
Subject:  Sports News

IN SPORTS TODAY:

After failing to secure a win via a recount of points, the Tennessee Titans
(6-7) are now demanding to replay the final down of their recent 42-41 loss
to the Dallas Cowboys (7-6).  Titan team officials explained that Titan
fans
intended for the final down field goal attempt to be good, and that
replaying the down is therefore justified despite the ruling of officials
that the ball did not pass thru the uprights.  Titan team officials added
that the width of the uprights confused kicker Al DelGreco (17yrs - Auburn)
on the 19 yard attempt and that the uprights should be widened for a replay
of the down.  Cowboys team officials countered that DelGreco had seen the
uprights before the game and had not complained to the officials.  They
added that Cowboy kicker Tim Seder (R - Arkansas) successfully kicked thru
the same uprights during the game from distances of 47, 42 and 36 yards.


Good news.  It sounds like MISO will offer a way to handle losses financially.  Based on their previously filed tariff, it appeared that they would not, but it seems they have reconsidered and recently filed a new Attachment M that details how they will handle losses financially.  I have not yet seen the new Attachment M, so it may be a complex or costly process, but hopefully, it will be fine.

Now, for the Important Question.  MISO does not believe they will be able to process third-party loss schedules (either INT or EXT, in Tag parlance) on Dec 15.  I don't think this is an issue for us (I expect we will typically be either accounting for losses financially or through in-kind schedules (dropping off losses along the path).

If this is not correct, and we do sometimes schedule in losses under separate transactions, please let me know ASAP.  Also let me know how prevalent that practice is.  MISO is trying to figure out how urgent the need is to accommodate that on Dec 15.  While they don't believe they will be able to meet that deadline, they want to know how many resources they should allocate to addressing the problem.

Thanks,

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


URGENT - WEATHER MESSAGE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAN FRANCISCO CA
400 PM PDT SUN MAY 20 2001

.HIGH PRESSURE BUILDING OVER THE GREAT BASIN COUPLED WITH LOW
PRESSURE ALONG THE COAST WILL CAUSE STRONG...GUSTY NORTHEASTERLY
WINDS TO DEVELOP LATE TONIGHT AND CONTINUE INTO MONDAY MORNING.

CAZ007-008-065-211800-
NAPA COUNTY-ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES-SANTA CLARA COUNTY-
400 PM PDT SUN MAY 20 2001

...WIND ADVISORY FOR THE HILLS LATE TONIGHT AND MONDAY MORNING...

STRONG NORTHEAST WINDS OF 25 TO 35 MPH WITH GUSTS TO 45 MPH
WILL DEVELOP OVER THE HIGHER ELEVATIONS OF THE NORTH...EAST AND
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA HILLS TONIGHT. THE WINDS WILL CONTINUE
STRONG AND GUSTY THROUGH MONDAY MORNING...THEN BEGIN WEAKENING BY
MONDAY AFTERNOON. STRONGEST WINDS ARE EXPECTED IN THE EAST BAY HILLS.

$$

STRONG WINDS MAY CAUSE POWER OUTAGES AND RESULT IN TREES...BRANCHES
...OR OTHER DEBRIS BEING BLOWN ONTO ROADWAYS. STAY TUNED TO YOUR
FAVORITE MEDIA SOURCE OR VISIT THE NWS WEB SITE AT NWS.MBAY.NET FOR
THE LATEST INFORMATION.

ANDERSON/DYKEMA

NNNN

[SFONPWSFO/990399235]

EDIS-05-20-01 1554 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------