Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042604.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 114.00 / Final: 113.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Updated: June 7, 2001                               Nuclear waste: an Achilles' heel  In 1992, a committee of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was asked to investigate the technical and institutional options for the future of nuclear power.                                                                                Look for more wellhead-to-power plant deals Generators, traders realize they must control gas  Reserve-rich firms are targets                                                            Which households buy green energy? People will pay more for green  Interested parties rarely seek out green  Survey pinpoints 22 million-household market                                                         Farm-fresh biopower Biomass enjoys unique consortium of support  Co-firing with coal offers near-term potential  Land conflicts may be problematic                                                   BPA sees October power contract rates up over 150% go to full story...   DOE review finds more natural gas off-limits to drilling in Rockies go to full story...   ESAI: natural gas supply may overshoot demand in 2002 go to full story...   NRG Energy buys Vattenfall's interests in three South American projects go to full story...   Lisbon converted to gas go to full story...   Justice investigating AES, Williams for antitrust violations go to full story...    Conectiv sells telecom business, stake in plant go to full story...   Reliant urges FERC to drop California price caps go to full story...   San Jose approves controversial plant go to full story...   Pacific Gas and Electric says shouldn't pay to avert blackouts go to full story...    To view all of today's Executive News headlines,  click here                               ? Copyright ? 2001 - FT Energy, All Rights Reserved. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.    Market Brief   Wednesday, June 6 Stocks Close Change % Change DJIA 11,070.24 (105.6) -0.94% DJ 15 Util. 372.65 (9.1) -2.37% NASDAQ 2,217.73 (15.93) -0.71% S&P 500 1,270.03 (13.5) -1.05%     Market Vols Close Change % Change AMEX (000) 111,256 (7,350.0) -6.20% NASDAQ (000) 1,772,162 (70,677.0) -3.84% NYSE (000) 1,062,316 (53,401.0) -4.79%     Commodities Close Change % Change Crude Oil (Jul) 27.72 (0.52) -1.84% Heating Oil (Jul) 0.7664 (0.003) -0.40% Nat. Gas (Henry) 3.801 (0.091) -2.34% Palo Verde (Jul) 173.00 (49.00) -22.07% COB (Jul) 160.00 (45.00) -21.95% PJM (Jul) 76.50 (5.50) -6.71%     Dollar US $ Close Change % Change Australia $  1.937 (0.026) -1.32% Canada $   1.525 (0.005) -0.33% Germany Dmark  2.306 0.011  0.48% Euro   0.8474 (0.007) -0.77% Japan ?en  120.40 0.000  0.00% Mexico NP 9.12 (0.020) -0.22% UK Pound   0.7184 0.0100  1.41%     Foreign Indices Close Change % Change Arg MerVal 439.19 (3.71) -0.84% Austr All Ord. 3,355.20 0.70  0.02% Braz Bovespa 15328.83 (65.99) -0.43% Can TSE 300  8194.39 (64.43) -0.78% Germany DAX 6192.44 (49.69) -0.80% HK HangSeng 13253.39 0.00  0.00% Japan Nikkei 225  13174.84 (16.17) -0.12% Mexico IPC  6790.98 118.63  1.78% UK FTSE 100 5,901.50 (21.00) -0.35%       Source:  Yahoo! & TradingDay.com   	                            Advertise on Energy Insight

 - market briefs.xls


Today's (8/30) Customer Accounts meeting will be held in 49C2 at 1:30pm.
Alma for Larry


dan assume you are doing letter notifying them of $ due after l/c $ applied.
we have name of attorney that we should cc i guess if we can find where he is.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393

	Russell Diamond
	06/30/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J
Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Cage -Termination Amount

Debbie,

Below is the termination payment as calculated by the Structuring group.
This is the amount we should use when notifying Cage of their payment owed
ENA.  I think we should send a letter out to them with the amount owed to
ENA.  I do not know if it is necessary to mention the draw on the L/C, which
we have received.

Thanks

Russell

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Moon                           06/30/2000 09:29 AM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Russell,

The costs for the Cage Gas Transaction are outlined below:

June 16, 2000 - June 19, 2000  = $9,537
June 20, 2000 = $2,272
June 21, 2000 - June 30, 2000 = $21,255
July 1, 2000 - End of Deals = $735,696
---------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL COST  =  $768,761

edm


Great food for thought.  Thanks.  My only concern is timing.  Likely to be
spending the balance of the week (tomorrow and Friday) on prep for the
FERC/House subcomittee hearings. We can discuss further on the staff meeting
call tomorrow.

Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/06/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Strategy

I'd like us to take a stab at drafting the California strategy so we can
present initial thoughts at the meeting I'm hoping to set up next Wednesday
in D.C.  (Discussed under separate e-mail).  To that end, I suggest the
following outline for the strategy:

What are our specific business interests in California?  Let's be as specific
as possible, but limit the list to "hot buttons."   In this regard, Jim
Steffes identified "the imposition of price caps in the summer of 2001" as
the hot button.  Are there others?
What are the forums we expect will affect our business interests?
For each forum, how do we want to posture Enron?  Do we want to be the most
aggressive company?  Do we want to act alone?  Do we want to work only in
coalitions?  What about IEP?  What will motivate us to act independently?
What is our overall strategy?  Do we want to go back to our pre-1999
rhetoric?  We can scream louder than anyone else that California didn't do it
right..  Peace will be gone ... should we breach Steve K.'s promise to play
nice?  Do we want to tear down AB 1890 or shore it up?
Forum-by-forum identify our:  (a) goals; (b) strategy; (c) what we (Enron)
want out of the forum.  For example, re:  the legislature, do we want to
identify legislation that we will seek affirmatively?  If not, why not?


hey....just an fyi, we talked last night...conversation took less than 5 mins and i think somehow whatever i needed to hear was said, or not said if that makes any sense.  anyway, i'm definitely up for a drink tonight as well as shutting this door behind me and keeping an eye open for the next one ahead.

.....the guy actually said that he was "bummed"....that choice of words did wonders for me....i mean, you get bummed they don't make your favorite candy bar anymore or b/c you had a disappointing meal....it's just not enough that someone be "bummed" by the prospect of never being with me again.

talk to you later,
SueBob


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
01:48 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato@ENRON
07/10/2000 01:03 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

I have asked the crude group to give a presentation on fuel oil supply and
demand which will take place Wednesday July 12 at 2:15 in the big boardroom
on the 30th floor. I would encourage everyone to come and bring any traders
that you think would benefit from it.


We had a very successful meeting with investors last Thursday at Enron's
annual investor conference. The event was also webcast to individuals
worldwide, including analysts, investors and media.

A link to the replay of the webcast is available at www.enron.com.  A list of
the presentations that were made at the meeting will appear on the screen.
To view a presentation, simply click on the title.  The entire webcast is
about eight hours long, with each presentation lasting about 45 minutes to
one hour.  The webcast will be available 24 hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week
until Feb. 28.

This is an excellent opportunity for you to get the latest information about
Enron's business activities and strategy.  If you encounter problems
accessing the webcast, call 1-888-457-7469 for help.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jill Melendy [mailto:jillmelendy@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:56 PM
To: sshackl@swbell.net
Subject: Dutton-Goldfield

Dear Sara:

I apologize for the delay but I have been unsuccessful in finding a good way
to get you your wine.  I am unable to ship FedEx or UPS unless it is going
to a distributor.  We have some customers who live in similar "unfriendly"
wine states who make arrangements with private mailing companies here in
California and we have mailed it to them.  Unfortunately, the danger in us
doing it is it could get held up somewhere along the way and they may
destroy it.  I believe it is too much wine to risk the possibility.

I will continue to look into other possibilities but if you have any
suggestions or are planning to be in another state soon, please let me know
and I will do whatever I can to get it to you.

Regards,

Jill Melendy
Dutton-Goldfield Winery

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Hey Guys.

We have a new strategy taking power from the south to the north. Right now
Sierra Pacific will only let us schedule 12MW on the tie so do not try to
schedule any more (The tie is only good for 17MW).

- Either do a export from SP15 to Silverpeak or put in a wheel going out at
Silverpeak(From PV or FC).
- Buy transmission from SPP from  (www.swoasis.com ) CONTROL TO HILLTOP.
($6.90 on-peak, $3.90 off-peak)
- Buy transmission from PAC from MAL2 TO MAL5. ($5.84)
- Buy transmission from BPA from HILLTOP TO SNOHO or another Sink. (Account
numbers below).

We need to bounce this of SNOHO before we send it back in at Malin.

THIS SCHEDULE NEEDS TO BE TAGGED OR SIERRA PACIFIC GETS VERY PISSED OFF, THEY
ARE NOT USED TO DOING TO MUCH REAL TIME. THERE IS A TEMPLATE FOR THIS
SCHEDULE SO IT SHOULD NOT BE HARD. Call and confirm the request with both PAC
and Sierra.

Also do not sell to a marketer(especially POWEREX) without sleeving. We do
not want anybody else to know about the path. If Powerex sees this I
guarantee that they would try to schedule this and we do not want
competition. Right now the only person using the tie is SOCAL EDISON and they
are flowing 12MW into Cali, going the opposite way of us way.

It is available 24hrs a day so lets take advantage of it as much as we can.
If you have any questions over the weekend call me.

Account numbers:
SPP - PAC: 853724
SPP-SNOHO: 853703
SPP-PUGET: 853725

Geir


Mike

I'm coming down this week.  We'll talk about it then.

John


Gabriela del Campo
11138 Aqua Vista St., 33
Studio City, CA 91602
gd@skycastle.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Gabriela del Campo


If you're on the internet right now, I'm trying to call...our meeting was postponed.


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/13/2000 06:29
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/13/2000 06:24 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec Dereg Wed -Sources, DJ Ca
lif PUC Proposes To Let Utilities Out of CalPX

13:16 GMT 13 December 2000 =DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec Dereg
Wed -Sources
(This article was originally published Tuesday)

   By Jason Leopold
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX), saying the current
state of California's power markets threatens the company with bankruptcy,
will call Wednesday for an end to California's four-year experiment with
deregulation, sources familiar with the issue told Dow Jones Newswires.
John Bryson, chief executive of Edison International, is expected to
announce that the company's regulated utility unit, Southern California
Edison, won't be able to recover more than $3 billion in losses related to
power purchases and continue serving its retail customers unless the state's
deregulated market structure is scrapped.
In a move tantamount to a call for reregulation, Edison will propose to
break ground on new power plants within 90 days and re-enter the
power-generation business Southern California Edison was required to exit
under the state's landmark 1996 deregulation law, the sources said.
Edison plans to follow the announcement by filing a request with state
regulators to increase retail electricity rates by as much as 20%, the
sources said, even though regulators rejected Edison's request for a rate
increase of 10% last week.
The utility has lined up the support of some state lawmakers for the broader
proposal, which would require action by the state legislature, the sources
said.
Southern California Edison, with 4.2 million customers, is one of the
country's largest electric utilities. Edison was the first of the state's
utilities to sign on to the deregulation effort and, as it says on its Web
site, "played a central role in the restructuring of the electric industry
in California."
Among the concessions won by utilities in 1996 is the rate freeze, which
they demanded to help them recover costs related to deregulation but which
is now producing huge losses.
Edison's current losses stem from an imbalance between the soaring prices it
must pay to purchase power on the wholesale markets and the fixed rate at
which it can sell power to its customers.
About half of those losses are offset the utility's own power sales
revenues, which are accounted for separately and used to pay down
deregulation-related debt. Rising power costs have produced a surplus in
that account. Edison wouldn't reveal the current size of the surplus, but
said previously that the California Power Exchange paid the utility $1.3
billion over its generating costs for power through the end of September, at
a time when its power-purchase losses were $2.4 billion.

   Power-Purchase Losses Mounting

The net losses continue to mount. California's wholesale power prices
hovered at record levels all summer and spiked even higher in the past two
weeks, as colder weather arrived in the Northwest at a time when much of
California's power supply was down for maintenance.
The price of power for delivery Wednesday in California hit an average of
$1,182 a megawatt-hour Tuesday, up from $250 a megawatt-hour a week ago, the
result of high demand and a decision by California's wholesale market
operator to lift its cap on prices.
The rate Southern California Edison can charge its retail customers,
however, is fixed at $66/MWh.
Last week, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) downgraded its ratings for Edison
International and PG&E Corp. (PCG), the parent of California's other major
utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, to neutral, saying the utilities may be
forced to file for bankruptcy if the state doesn't allow them to raise their
retail rates.
A Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (MWD) analyst drew the same conclusion Monday,
also cutting his rating to neutral.
Edison to this point has kept its power-purchase losses off its earnings
statement, in hopes that a political or regulatory solution will allow them
to be collected later.
The California Public Utilities Commission put the hope of such a solution
further out of reach last week, however, when it ruled against rate
increases sought by Edison and PG&E.
Credit rating agency Fitch Inc. on Monday lowered its ratings for Edison
International and Southern California Edison's senior unsecured debt to the
A-minus level, citing "increased liquidity pressure" and uncertainty about
the utilities' ability to recover the costs of their power purchases. The
agency downgraded Edison International, the parent, because half its
consolidated cash flow is provided by Southern California Edison.
Edison - which sources said plans to remain in the retail electricity
business - said late last week that it has secured a $1 billion line of
credit and expects to have enough cash on hand to continue to pay for
wholesale electricity for the next several months.
California paid more than $1 billion for power last week, sources said. Some
of that, however, was paid to Southern California Edison, which still
generates about 2,800 megawatts of power in the state.
Shares in Edison International have fallen 21% over the past three weeks.
They closed Wednesday at $18.56, down $0.06.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(Mark Golden contributed to this article.)
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:16 GMT 13 December 2000 DJ Calif PUC Proposes To Let Utilities Out of
CalPX
(This article was originally published Tuesday)
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The California Public Utilities Commission has
proposed letting the state's three investor-owned utilities out of the
requirement that they purchase their power through the California Power
Exchange.
The proposed ruling, written by Commissioner Carl Wood, would direct
"jurisdictional utilities to serve their native load, to the extent
possible, with their retained generation and power purchase contracts,
rather than through a bidding process."
Commissioners will take a final vote on the ruling Dec. 21, but the three
Democrats on the five-member commission - including Wood - usually agree on
proposed rulings before the rulings are put on the voting agenda, which was
posted Tuesday.
The change is in line with the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
proposed ruling Nov. 1, which will get a final vote Friday, to remove the
mandate that the utilities buy their power from the state-chartered
California Power Exchange.
The PX has been a lynchpin of the state's electric utility deregulation,
passed in 1996. It was to be a clearing house for a multitude of bulk power
producers and sellers, and its market prices were to be passed on to
remaining customers of the utilities after the deregulation transition to
free markets.
But Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric Co, which emerged from
the transition period a year ago, was passing on CalPX prices to customer
until this summer, when electricity prices tripled and the PUC fixed SDG&E
rates again.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

   (END) Dow Jones Newswires  13-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


pcappers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 1400 and 1600 in the 29 November 2000
Real-Time market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify
prices:
PJM: 000 - 200, 2100, 2300
HQ: 700 - 1000, 2100, 2300
OH: 2100, 2300
NE: 2100, 2300.
Hours beginning 1800 and 2200 in the 30 November 2000 Day-Ahead market are
being
reserved to verify prices.


Due to the current business circumstances the hours to the Energizer Cafe, The Express Store, and Plaza Java will be adjusted as of Monday, December 10, 2001.  Please note the operating hours for each location below:

Energizer Cafe		Breakfast: 7:30 to 9:00 AM
			Lunch: 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM

The Express Store	8:30 AM to 3:00 PM

Plaza Java		7:00 AM to 3:00 PM

Thank you.


I would appear to me that there may be some misconceptions here.     Why do we assume that by entering into a financing deal we will be any better off?  I would tell you that to the extent there was any risk in the deal, that we should probably charge someone else about 25-30% as well.     Think about it, 25% is only 15% after tax.   Has some one enumerated the risks and valued them on this deal?   I haven't seen any of that work, if it has been done.

I think I understand the concept proposed and I understand the proposed goal line, return with little or no expense up front.     I would assume that we would be willing to enter into a fixed price service agreement for a number of years?     Is Halliburton willing to take any risks whatsoever?

Alternatively, why don't we go through GSS (Global Strategic Sourcing) to look for a better deal?

Jim:   Have you looked at this for ideas on the accounting side?    Why can't I do a prepayment of a service contract fee and recognize the expense over the life of the deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Waymire, Dave
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Gilbert, Steve
Cc:	Centilli, James
Subject:	RE: Redfield Deliverability Project

Rod,

Below is some background on the Redfield Deliverability Project.

Halliburton initiated the contact with NNG to provide work over on selected wells based on software modeling in order to return deliverability to their original levels.  The work overs are planned over a 2-3 year period and are expected to have a lasting effect of at least 10 years.  The cost to model and rework these wells is estimated to be $5.73MM.  A test program would be conducted in the first year to determine the feasibility of continuing the program at a cost of $768,000.  If the test program did not prove out the project would be terminated at this point.  The original proposal was to treat the costs of the program as expense as the costs were incurred. Bob Chandler confirmed this accounting treatment.  This would result as Kent has indicated negative EBIT for the first 2-3 years.

As an alternative it was proposed to Halliburton that NNG would enter into a 10 year service agreement with Halliburton to model and rework the wells and provide guidance on proposed well work overs for the Redfield storage field.  Halliburton would agree to perform the test program and if test results indicate that further work overs would be economically feasible would spend an additional $4.96MM on a total of 60 well workovers in the first 3 years of the contract.  NNG currently budgets $300,000 per year for Redfield well maintenance with minimal increase in deliverability. Operations has committed $300,000 per year in well maintenance over the next 5 years to this project for a total of $1.5MM.

Halliburton has not formalized their counter offer, but has indicated that they would require a 25% to 30% return for assuming the financing.  Halliburton indicated that this is a non-standard deal for them and that is the reason for high return requirement.

The objective is to structure the deal as a service agreement either with an Enron Entity who would then contract with Halliburton or some other third party at a more reasonable rate.  Even at an estimated 30% return, preliminary incremental EBIT estimates for the Halliburton service agreement are between $400,000 to $500,000 the first 5 years and  $250,00 to $275,000 for the out years.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 7:05 AM
To:	Gilbert, Steve
Cc:	Waymire, Dave
Subject:	RE: Redfield Deliverability Project

Couple of quick comments.    Prepaying as an expense would require coming up with some income to offset, and generally doesn't make economic sense.   An Enron company can't help because it consolidates, and therefore ends up with the same accounting results as we do.       What accountants have reviewed the proposal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Kent
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; McCarty, Danny
Cc:	Waymire, Dave; Neubauer, Dave; Neville, Sue; Thomas, Steve
Subject:	Redfield Deliverability Project

Rod,

We looking for your help on some ideas on how to implement a good long term project that has negative short term cash flow.

We have been working with Halliburton to identify deliverability improvements at Redfield through the use of  improved technology related to identifying poor performing wells and implementing down hole remediation.  This project has costs and revenues as shown below that are great from a long term standpoint.  Steve Thomas and Maurice Gilbert have done an excellent job of identifying the benefits to NNG and the upsides in revenue that are expected.  Dave Waymire has also been very helpful in analyzing alternative and economics and have shown that the project has a great return (in excess of 30%).  Our problem is that the cost for the workovers at Redfield are all O&M expenses and not capital and we have a negative IBIT for the first 2 - 3 years of the project.  We have proposed that Halliburton structure the expenses such that they come in over a 5 - 10 year period so we don't have this negative IBIT flow in the first years, however, Halliburton has not been interested and has proposed a 30% finance charge for this structure.

What would be the appetite for possibly pre-paying a majority of these costs in '01 to avoid the negative '02 and '03 earnings impact or is there an Enron company that would finance/extend the expense payments.  This is a great project that we should do, however, it is difficult given the negative earnings impacts in the first couple of years.  Got any ideas to handle this financial hurdle??????

Year		Expense		Revenue		Net
'01		   ($173,000)		     -0-			  ($173,000)
'02		($2,420,000)		   $300,000		($2,120,000)
'03		($2,250,000)		$1,290,000		   ($960,000)
'04 and		       -0-			$2,055,000/yr		 $2,055,000/yr
forward

Thanks,

Kent


Sounds like a good trip if there are spaces available.  I think our dive
captain is checking availability.  Of course our dive captain is also
hesitant about being swallowed whole by a Whale Shark.  I told him that with
a house to remodel that would probably be a blessing.

Let us know what your schedule is.  See if we can't hook up Thursday or
Friday for lunch.  I open and I am sure Nacious E would be too.

Ryan.F.Ruppert@EXXON.sprint.com on 02/23/2000 09:54:03 AM
To: Eric.Gillaspie@enron.com, Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
cc:
Subject: What up?

         Date: February 23, 2000
         From: Ruppert, Ryan F.                            R9RUPPE  - AMERICAS
           To: EXT-ERIC.GILLASPIE(A)ENRON.COM,             ERICGILL - FPEXMAIL
               EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM,               GERALDNE - FPEXMAIL
      Subject: What up?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey you hosers, what's up with swimming with the fishys?  Are we going to
check out those hammerheads or what?

Sorry about the mix up on lunch yesterday.  Let me know if you want to try
again.

OUT

RYAN F. RUPPERT
Geophysical User Support
Upstream Technical Computing
ExxonMobil Corporation


X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <37F38052.47420942@cia-g.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 09:22:58 -0600
From: rtc <rtc@cia-g.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dperlin@ect.enron.com
Subject: bead necklace with jacla
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------E28742EFA6F152B75FF7C20D"

Dear Debra,

Here are four dead pawn necklaces with the jacla.  Three are Navajo and
one is Santa Domingo.  The Santa Domingo is the necklace that keeps the
same shape throughout the whole piece.  The most expensive necklace is
going to be an older piece, and it is a nice piece which uses turquoise
between beads instead of heishe.
price 005s.jpg $425 (ahy 443)
price 006s.jpg $325 (ajj 323)
price 007s.jpg $750 (ahp 119)
price 008s.jpg $175 (ahg 595)

Please let me know if this is not what you had in mind.  We have a large
selection of necklaces with the jacla.  The price range is going to go
from $100 - $8000.

Thank you,
Jason Arsenault
Richardson's Trading Company

 - Mvc-005s.jpg
 - Mvc-006s.jpg
 - Mvc-007s.jpg
 - Mvc-008s.jpg


We shall talk on Monday.    There was a discussion about this on Friday, Noel,
Phil, Melissa, Joanne and myself.    Someone will be in touch on Monday.

Joan_Veselack@enron.com on 01/29/2000 11:37:23 AM
Please respond to Joan_Veselack@enron.com

To: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Heidi
Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
bperrone@columbiaenergy.com
cc: rsupert@ect.enron.com, sneal@ect.enron.com, rallwein@ect.enron.com,
Joann_Collins@enron.com, vlamadr@ect.enron.com, kkelly@ect.enron.com,
shendri@ect.enron.com, djenkin@ect.enron.com, cgerman@ect.enron.com, Kim
Novsek
Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
Subject: Re: TCO STOW Overage - 1/24 - NEED ANSWER

What's the final answer.... do you need the enduser gas or do you want me
to cut the enduser gas? P

 If you really need the enduser gas... the only other option is for me...
is to beg TCO to let me inject some pool gas into storage for that gas day
to avoid the $10 withdrawal penalty... but we would still incur the overrun
charge plus the additional overrun charge to get the gas into storage. Need
a decision by 1 pm CST time on Monday, January 31st. Thank you!!!!

Please pass this note to Melissa... still don't have her e-mail address.

Can't wait for it to warm up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Joan Veselack
 pic29906.pcx) 01/27/2000 07:38 PM

To:   hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:   mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com,
      Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
      Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
      Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
      Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  TCO STOW Overage - 1/24

Kara/Heidi, please give this to Brian and Melissa.

Because the burns significantly increased on 1/24 from the forecasted
amount (+16749). Contract #63281 was over-run and Storage #51407 was
over-withdrawn. Contract over-run is $.21 per dkt and storage
over-withdrawls are $10 per dkt.

Because the forecast was lower, I let Joann use the extra space for CES
Enduser Market. TCO will let me cut gas to CES Enduser Markets as a retro.
Not sure if you want this gas to flow or try to make it up over the
weekend. If you need the gas to flow because of OFO penalties, maybe the
storage over-withdrawal is cheaper than incurring OFO penalties. Please
tell me what you want me to do. Need to do the retro's ASAP while TCO is
still feeling generous.

FYI, the traders at Enron talked to Noel Bartlo on Tuesday. Noel said any
costs over the space that retail had (134,710 for choice), Enron had the
right to pass on the costs. I really hope the Noel communicated that to CES
Retail. I would hate to have a huge misunderstanding between Enron and CES
Retail. Remember, we schedulers are caught in the middle... and don't try
to cause unnecessary pain.

63281/236 coh 7-1        2934/2872
63281/170 coh 7-5        1922/1881
63281/99  coh 5-2        427/418
63281/221 cpa8-35   1639/1604
63281/220 cpa8-35   511/500

Total                    7433/7275

 - pic29906.pcx


---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
06:52 PM ---------------------------

Mark McClure
04/23/2001 06:40 PM
To: Alton Honore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ellenberger/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Flash Gas Meeting Recap(4/23/2001)

Recap of today's meeting covering Transco's Flash Gas.

Problem:
Flash gas purchase by ENA from TDC not recorded(pathed) in Unify
Commodity gas pathed in Unify and actualized in Unify, but actualized volumes
may have included flash gas volumes for various months in order to tie out
with the pipeline
Transco paid ENA for Imbalance gas(Cashin)
ENA never paid TDC for Flash gas

Solution:
Logistics will create Deal Ticket to capture Flash Gas previously not
recorded(pathed)
Deal #745628  March 2000 - Feb. 2001(East Desk)
Deal #745637  March 2001 - until  (Gulf 1 - Desk)
Logistics will create paths to capture Flash Gas activity for all prior
months(paths will be of actual flow amount per TDC Statement - refer to
Alton's worksheet)
The new paths will not be to any Internal/External Pools, but to K#4983 to
capture imbalance amount
Alton will then actualize volumes based on Transco Pipeline Statement(they
should match TDC invoiced amount)
Alton will verify that all cash out' s for prior months tie to Transco's
pipeline statement. In addition Alton will confirm that the imbalance did not
include any Flash gas volumes in the calculations
Alton will reverse out any Manual payment made to Transco(if any?) and
replace it with Unify System adjusted entries
Mary Ellenberger will verify rates to be paid to TDC with the trader and pay
TDC for Flash Gas once approved
Going forward logistic will create pathes capturing Flash Gas volumes
Target dated of completion no later than April 25, 2001

If there is anything that was left off this list to do please let me know.

Thanks for all of your help in resolving this problem.

m.m.


Rebecca:

I am attaching a clean and blacklined version of the proposed resolutions authorizing the opening of brokerage accounts.  I have attempted to revise them to make them clearer.  Perhaps Jim Armogida can assist in revising them as I am sure he is more familiar with the way Enron Corp. likes their resolutions drafted than we are.

Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie
x33907


Jessica, I will probably not be in on Thurs as I am traveling to Winnipeg for the next few days.

At this time, I do not have a cell phone number where I can be reached at... but I will get a number to you.

Please direct my calls accordingly and any messages to my main line. I will check this on a regular basis.

Thanks, BT

I will call you thurs. a.m.


Does anyone have this file?  If so, can I borrow it for 5 minutes?  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Ken has talked about EES willingness to invest this money in demand side
management, if the right program were set up -- eg a demand buydown program.

	Leslie Lawner
	02/13/2001 06:53 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ken Lay promise

Apparently there are rumors that Ken Lay promised to make some kind of
investment in California when he was talking to folks in the state ($300
million in DSM?)  Do any of you know what this commitment might be?  Sandy
needs to be filled in on this.  Let me know as soon as you can.


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 02:39 PM
---------------------------

 - AHMED.MPEG


3:30 at Ed's desk if fine.

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: Fw: Meet at 330

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay <Kay.Mann@ENRON.com>
To: McMichael Jr., Ed <Ed.McMichael@ENRON.com>
CC: Boyt, Eric <Eric.Boyt@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Mar 26 13:39:25 2002
Subject: Meet at 330

Can we meet at 330 so m
Mark Ellenberg can participate?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Nabil,  Can you please provide the dates that you are planning on working for
the 1st half of the summer. I called your residence earlier today, but your
machine did not pick up.    It is probably easier to communicate via email
since we both keep missing each other.  Thanks.


Jim,

I spoke to Bob Lewis (someone I used to work with at APX) Bob has extensive
BPA experience.

Bob told me that BPA has about 8000Mws of generation and 11000MWs of load for
this year.  As he understands, BPA should be covered for 2001, they have
essentially paid most of the DSI's (Aluminum Plants, not to run.  BPA has
also negotiated a deal with some Irrigation districts, totalling about 600
MWs and worked with some others to buy down their load).  BPA had a excess of
one(1) $ Billon in the bank which is essentially used up now.  The only way
they can replenish this fund is to raise rates under the CRAC, Cost Revenue
Adjustment Clause.  Depending upon the water year for 2002 the rates will
more than likely go back down in 6-12 months.  As I undrstood, BPA should
have all their load covered, eith by their own generation, load buy-downs or
short-term (spot) contracts.  The only DSI (Aluminum Plant) that I have heard
is not participating in the BPA Buy-Back is Kaiser and they are taking their
$20 power and reselling it on the spot at $200!

As I'm sure you know, BPA was formed to sell preference power from federal
projects, unitl 1980 they matched their output to the load.  In 1980 there
was an ACT passed which BPA was given the authority to acquire power to meet
new demand.  Until this past year and the shortages in California, BPA could
meet their increased demand on the spot markets, but with prices contorted
because of CA, acquiring power on the spot has been prohibitive, so we have
everyone becoming attentive to the problems in the west.

Kind Regards,

Dave

Steve Walton
05/07/2001 09:07 AM
To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: BPA Issues with Negawatt Proposal in Barton

Do we have a copy of the proposal in its current form?  The case of the DSI's
is somewhat unique, I believe, because contracts are in place which at least
define their obligations/rights.  In the case of ordinary tariff customers,
these elements are missing.  It would seem that we could work around them
somehow,  because they already have a special status as direct retail
customers of BPA.  We need to have both the customer and the utility benefit
from the deal if this is really going to work.

	Linda Robertson@ENRON
	05/07/2001 08:13 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Shelk/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: BPA Issues with Negawatt Proposal in Barton

The markup is this week.  Thus, we need to get our response to BPA in
circulation on the Hill by COB today.  Tom Briggs, please coordinate this.
Thanks.

	James D Steffes
	05/04/2001 07:34 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: BPA Issues with Negawatt Proposal in Barton

Alan and Steve --

You may have already done this, but we need to develop a solid response to
BPA's criticism of the negawatt proposal - "the criticism was that BPA would
be forced to purchase power on the open market at a high price since it is
short, sell it to the DSIs under contract; let the DSI sell it at market
rates and capture the difference; BPA witness said that thus sec. 102 would
make it difficult if not impossible to implement their strategy to avoid as
much as a 200 percent rate increase on 10/1/01; BPA testimony will make it
tough for Members of Congress from that service region to support sec. 102."?

My initial response is that BPA is (a) finding someone to blame for its
proposed rate increase, (b) try to get out of fulfilling firm obligations to
the DSI customers, and  (c) making excuses for being short in today's market
- again an example of why the government shouldn't be in the Power business.

What the negawatt proposal would do would be to allow BPA to discuss frankly
with firm DSI customers how to share in the benefits of reducing their load.
Given that BPA is short, this type of proposal makes perfect sense (from a
BPA only perspective and from a West wide perspective - if enough load comes
off, any remaining short that BPA must fill would be at a lower price).

We need to get back to the DC office with our best arguments.

Thanks,

Jim


Vince,

I have made bold face edits to the attached document.  I still have two edits
to make but am concerned that you were not reading the most recent version.
Sorry for any confusion but the editor doesn't use the edit function in word
so I have ended up making edits on new versions of the paper.

I still haven't made the change regarding the take-or-pay problem (I left
that paper at home in my briefcase and will make the change tomorrow
morning).  Also, I haven't added anything regarding the conflict that arose
over pay for new hires nor have I received the Business Week e-mail from you.

However, if the paper looks ok to Mark Palmer we can make these minor edits
on the galley pages of the article.

thanks

john

p.s. i am very disappointed about the scheduling conflict you have on Feb
23rd.  you will be greatly missed but i certainly understand.
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Tanya here is the Master you requested.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rohauer, Tanya
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Enfolio Template

Debra,

Could you please forward me a blank template of our Enfolio Master Firm document?

Thanks,
Tanya


Please find attached the final program for an exciting conference on "REAL
OPTIONS VALUATION IN THE NEW ECONOMY: Internet/E-commerce,
R&D/Pharmaceuticals, Energy." The conference, organised in New York City
March 13-15 by the Real Options Group and co-sponsored by Ernst & Young
LLP, is addressed to a corporate audience.

The chairman of the conference is Prof. Michael J. Brennan of UCLA who will
deliver the opening address, and the keynote speaker is Prof. Stewart C.
Myers of MIT.  Many of the world/s thought leaders in real options
analysis, along with prominent experts from many leading corporations will
also share their ideas and experiences.

Please note that the deadline for hotel registration is February 21 (see
the attached brochure for hotel details) and conference fees increase by
20% for those registering after March 1. The (full) conference brochure and
on-line conference registration are available at our website www.rogroup.com

We hope that you will be able to participate and would appreciate it if you
could also communicate this announcement among other interested colleagues.

In fact, it would be most helpful to us and would be greatly appreciated, if
you could send me (also cc. to amicaliz@sda.uni-bocconi.it) a list of 5-10
colleagues to whom we can send the electronic version of the brochure.

Best wishes,

Lenos Trigeorgis
President, Real Options Group

 - ROGNYConference.pdf

Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063


Greetings, members of the RTO West Stage 2 Tariff  Integration Group.
?
This e-mail is to remind you that we will meet on  Wednesday, March 21 from
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. at the RTO West office (5933 NE  Win Sivers Drive,
Suite 201, Portland).
?
This is also to let you know that a draft agenda and other  materials for the
March 21 meeting are posted on the Tariff Integration Group  Webpage on the
RTO West Website, which is at:
?
http://208.55.67.64/Stage2TariffIntGrpMain.htm
?
Thank you very much!
?
- Sarah


Matt:

Please advise as to any update after Neale/Suzanne soeak with Russell and
Sheila reagrding the conversations with Hyundai. Thanks.

Matthias Lee
09/29/99 08:23 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

FYI.

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 09/30/99 09:15 AM
---------------------------

akwan@wfw.com on 09/29/99 06:57:30 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: ngregson@wfw.com, sbainbridge@wfw.com

Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

Dear Matt

I refer to our discussions today.  We have reviewed the transcript between
Russell and Hyundai, together with the cited case which neatly summarises many
of the principles of repudiation and affirmation.

On its own, we do not consider that the transcript changes the position.  (We
are assuming that this conversation was the last before parties began to
communicate only in writing).  Although we agree that Hyundai's position is
somewhat equivocal in this fax, it was superceded by later written
correspondence which gives a timeframe for Hyundai to affirm the contract or
accept Enron's breach.  The later responses from Hyundai seems clear in its
acceptance of repudiation.

However, both Neale and I think it might be a good idea if we speak with
Russell
and Sheila together with you (perhaps with a view to taking short statements
from them).  If both their views are that Hyundai were equivocal in various
conversations and given Hyundai's earlier rather relaxed attitude to vessel
nomination, there may be some scope for constructing a stronger case that they
elected to affirm the contract.

If this suits, both Neale and I would be free Friday morning or late
afternoon.

Best regards

Suzanne


---------------------- Forwarded by Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT on 04/24/2001
03:00 PM ---------------------------

Cara Semperger
04/24/2001 02:52 PM
To: Portland Shift, Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Schedule cut at COB to run real time

Our upstream is Sempra, our Downstream is Mirant, it is a llh schedule that
was cut by 1 mw HE 4-6, 23-24.  Mirant is taking it to real time, and
Snohomish who is generating agrees with this.

Please call Mirant for the hours above to make sure everything is being
handled.  The path is marked in lotus notes with a cut symbol.

Cara


481735
Jeff Richter did not put a broker in. He's adding that.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/18/2000 01:33 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs

missing deal

sell aep
25 mw
125.00
Q4
np 158


Here is the weekly updated list of service providers/vendors that your neighbors have used, loved and recommend.

If this weekly update is becoming a pain, please let me know. I can maintain it and send it out only upon request if you prefer.
Chris Diaz
514 W. Drew

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here! <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=194081.1637497.3177299.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705044493:HM/A=795262/R=0/*http://www.ediets.com/start.cfm?code=3257>
  <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=194081.1637497.3177299.1261774/D=egroupmail/S=1705044493:HM/A=795262/rand=474267425>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.


FYI.

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:23:54 -0400
From: "Annette Fontenot" <annettef@katzlaw.com>
To: "Bill L. Bryant" <BILL@katzlaw.com>,	"Daphne E. Gilbert" <DAPHNE@katzlaw.com>
Subject: John Haswell 850-263-7344 (within the hour) Office	352-376-5226
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

Item Type:  Phone
Caller:  John Haswell
Phone:  850-263-7344 (within the hour) Office 352-376-5226

[X] Telephoned            [X] Please Call
[ ] Will Call Again       [ ] Returned Your Call
[ ] Wants to See You      [ ] Came to See You
[ ] Urgent

He would like to talk to you about the request he sent out for ENRON.  He tells that it has been two weeks and he would like to know if further action is necessary.


Here are two we did for Harry and Tangie.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dietz, Rick
Sent:	Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:15 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Confidential - PAA - HW & TD

Please accept the attached Personal Achievement Award request for Harry Woodson and Tangie Dykes.  I have included both of them on the same request form since their recognition is for their contributions toward the ONEOK arbitration project.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Rick


All,

Please mark you calendars, you  have been selected to participate in the  ENA Trading Track recruiting event Monday, October 29th , 3 pm - 7 pm.     If you are unable to interview on this date please advise.

A selection of you will telephone screen 18 external candidates, and decide whether or not they should proceed to the final round on the above date.    A separate e:mail will be sent in relation to this.

Any questions let me know.

Regards,

Karen
x54667


Gerald,
As per my phone message.  FPL would like us to return to the original Article
12 regarding governing law, except that they would accept Texas as opposed to
Florida.  They apparently do not like our arbitration provisions.

Thanks,
Greg ext. 31923
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001
09:16 AM ---------------------------
From: Greg Brazaitis on 11/27/2000 11:20 AM
To: bill_barrett@fpl.com
cc:
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Bill,
I have attached a red lined mark up of the Confidentiality Agreement which
you forwarded.  If needs be, we can get our counselors together directly to
review boiler plate issues.

Greg


HOPE ALL IS WELL WITH ALL OF YOU. FROM: MARRIED, 3 KIDS, PRACTICING LAW,
LIVING IN HOUSTON,RAT RACE ETC. TAKE CARE PATRO............  P.S LET ME HERE
FROM  ALL OFYOU....   P.S.S  I AM STILL  HIX'S IDOL

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Michael Middleton, MD [SMTP:mmiddleton@mailbox.sw.org]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:56 PM
> To:	Phi Delta Theta Texas Gamma
> Cc:	hhardy3953@aol.com; dkhutchins@att.net; nunley@heronet.ne.jp;
> crote@vaultnet.com; bshaw@bancleasing.com; JY@HAWAIIAN-FLOWERS.COM;
> greg@infohwy.com; conder@calhounstacy.com;
> rbhardaway@phase2consulting.com; randy.martin@nationsbank.com;
> beitter@branddevelopment.com; sneal@enron.com; bq175@aol.com;
> bubbatram1@aol.com; charleswilliams@chaswil.com; kdb@pdq.net;
> david.fisher@ourclub.com; moverofmt@aol.com; rs5785@aol.com;
> bwinters@primeprinting.com; cooperscloset@msn.com; PDT87@aol.com;
> neavx2@ix.netcom.com; mpatronella@williamsbailey.com;
> sbailey@txlutheran.edu; medgar@jump.net; absocold@absocold.com;
> blackwog@musc.edu; roland.brand@sap.com; cele3@aol.com
> Subject:	Re: Fwd: Br. M Middleton'81
>
> Hi Brothers....since this email got sent, it is clear I need to correct
> the proper address for my corny webpage is
> "www.accordions.com/mikemiddleton"
>
> I forgot to mention that Larry Augustus is still a tool.
>
> Would love to hear from any of you guys.....(except Larry..............)
> MM
> '85
> PS Larry, I'm just kidding, dont turn so redfaced!
>
>
>
> Phi Delta Theta Texas Gamma wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 	 >From: mmiddleton@mailbox.sw.org (Michael L. Middleton, M.D.)
> 	>To: texas_gamma@hotmail.com, texasgamma@edgarweb.com,
> stmckay@swbell.net, nasram@southwestern.edu
> 	>Subject: Br. M Middleton'81
> 	>Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 06:58:14 -0500
> 	>
> 	>Brothers,
> 	>I read the recent newsletter from Texas Gamma...glad things are
> going
> 	>well.
> 	>Unfortunately I will be unable to attend alumni weekend, but do
> have
> 	>some info to share with you for Spring newsletter. Many of the
> brothers
> 	>from 1981-87 may recall I was an active accordionist. I recently
> won an
> 	>international accordionist competition in the catagory of Texas
> Folk
> 	>Music and they have established my webpage as part of the prize.
> Please
> 	>share this info and address with our brothers.
> 	> Mike Middleton Champion Texan Accordionist
> 	>YITB,
> 	>Mike Middleton, MD
> 	>SU '85
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> 	Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> <http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp>
>


Although I haven't heard from Dave I'm trying to change my flights to March 8 - 11.


Here is draft of our letter of understanding.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 03:19
PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge
01/11/2001 09:40 AM
Sent by: Jenny Helton
To: Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PSE&G LOU

Attached please find the revised LOU and a redlined version compared to the
originals.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 03:23 PM -----

	Gillian Johnson@ENRON
	10/25/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA EnronCredit.com Limited

As we discussed this morning, here is the NDA from i2 Technologies.

Thanks.

Gillian
---------------------- Forwarded by Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Shea_Dugger@i2.com on 10/25/2000 02:56:18 PM
To: gillian.johnson@enron.com
cc: Cam_Reed@i2.com

Subject: NDA EnronCredit.com Limited

To Gillian Johnson:

As requested by Cam Reed, included in this e-mail is our standard bilateral
non-disclosure agreement.

Please have the appropriate person review, sign and date the document.  The
document can be returned by fax, mail or overnight courier.

1.  If the document is to be returned by fax, please send it to Ms. Kay
Klafehn, Manager, Legal Operations, fax number (469) 357-6566.  Upon
receipt it will be counter-signed by i2 and a fully executed copy returned
by fax and/or mail, or both.

2.  If the document is to be returned by mail, please send in duplicate
original copies to Ms. Kay Klafehn, Manager, i2 Technologies, Inc., 11701
Luna Road, Dallas, TX 75234.  Upon receipt it will be counter-signed by i2,
and an originally signed copy will be returned to you by mail.  If there
are any questions of a contractual nature, please call Kay Klafehn at (469)
357-7157.  If there are any questions of a general nature, please call me
at (469) 357-4195.  Thank you.

(See attached file: EnronCredit.com Limited NDA - Bilateral.doc)
____________________

Shea Dugger
Legal Dept.
Tel: 469-357-4195
Fax: 469-357-6566
shea_dugger@i2.com
 - EnronCredit.com Limited NDA - Bilateral.doc


Please see the following note from Sheila Walton.  She has asked that the
forms be returned to her by November 25th.  They can be sent interoffice mail
or by e-mail.

Thanks,

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/17/99 03:25 PM
---------------------------

Sheila Walton
11/15/99 05:45 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vice President Feedback Measurement Report

As you are aware, we are in the middle of the VP Performance Review Cycle.
On instructions from the Office of the Chair,  VP's and above will be
measured principally on the Skills/Behaviors criterion.  This will also be
supplemented by two additional indicators:

Providing Feedback to Staff
Participation in Recruiting efforts for Enron programs

Critical to the item "Providing Feedback to Staff" is your involvement in
collecting this data.  Attached is a form that should be distributed to all
your direct reports regarding this item.  The instructions ask the direct
reports to send this information back to me.  I will collate the data and
this will be available for use at both the December ENA Executive Review
Meeting on December 14, and  the January 5-6 Enron Executive Meeting.

Again, your involvement in helping me collect this data is critical to the
success.  Please contact me at Ext 30649 if you have any further questions.


Hey Brett,

Not too much going on in H-town.  I just recently started trading Natural Gas
Futures.  I have had three heart attacks, a stroke, and have bitten off all
of my fingers in a week.  Other than that things are going pretty well.

I should be in town for easter, so if you want to get together, lemme know.

How is artillery school going?

out

"Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com> on 03/06/2000 06:59:06 AM
To: John9375@aol.com, srhea@acm.org, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arrrgh ye scurvy Dogs.

What's up me droogs?  Just checkin in to see how every thing was goin.

John how was New Orleans?  Sean and Eric what are you animals doin fer
easter?

Lemme know.

Lawler, OUT.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


I'm always willing to drive for a free lunch.

Scott Goodell@ENRON
05/22/2000 11:15 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Lunch

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 05/22/2000
11:16 AM ---------------------------

Janet Edwards
05/22/2000 11:12 AM
To: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Lunch

I can drive.  I am parked at Clay.  BUT,  maybe Chris will offer since he
probably parks at Allen. ....Chris should drive since I am
paying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Janet


You and Frank can best decide how to organize this.  I am comfortable with
your decisions, so feel free to go ahead with this.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           02/15/2001 04:47 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Norma Yeverino/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Group Split

Sally,
If it is ok with you, Frank and I would like to split the group in the
following manner.

Frank would primarily take care of the following groups:
Bob Hall
Jeff Gosset
Stacey White
Sheri Thomas

I would primarily take care of the following groups:
Leslie Reeves
Shona Wilson
Beth Apollo
James Scribner
Mary Solmonson

Please let us know if this is ok with you and we will announce it
accordingly.
Thanks,
hgm


pmorrison@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants,

Please disregard any messages sent from the NYISO to ICAP buyers
today; there is a problem with our automatic e-mail system.  We
anticipate that the problem will be fixed shortly and messages
sent tomorrow concerning the ICAP auction will be correct.

Customer Relations
518-356-6060


<title>Power XL</title>

We've got a new product that you might be interested
in.  It's a next-generation POWER TRADING system -- and it utilizes the
most advanced technology available today to deliver extremely fast processing
for large, complex portfolios.  Power XL is used by power and gas traders
to manage down-to-the-hour positions and P/L -- in real-time without the need
to run batch processes or reports.  Slice and dice positions and trading
results, in real-time on your desktop.

Whether or not you are happy with your current system -- we'd like you to take
a look at Power XL.  No obligation, no expectations.  Just tell us
when and where.

For more information, visit http://www.tpt.com/pxl
or call me to schedule a demonstration.

Jeff Belanger

jeffb@tpt.com

Triple Point Technology, Inc.

+1.203.291.7979


Most useful buttons for you will be "Executive Summary" and "Cold Air Alert"

http://ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/research/Weather/WeatherMain.htm


Sally,  please let me know if you'd like to continue to receive this weekly
report and/or you'd like it revised in any way.

Thank you,
Toni Graham
Human Resources
x39995

---------------------- Forwarded by Toni Graham/Corp/Enron on 05/19/2000
10:10 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Veronica Parra @ ECT                           05/19/2000 03:52 PM

To: LeRea Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela J Allison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen
Jennings/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felicia Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda Vargo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Richard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah A
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Tumey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robbin Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Sprock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice
Riedel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Bien/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hector
McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron, Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle
Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carmen Chavira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Parra/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New Hire Orientation for Monday, May 22, 2000

NAME	TITLE	DOH	BADGE	HR REP	SUPERVISOR	CO/RC
Lee Ann Chance	Specialist	5/22/00	yes	N.Villarreal	Bryce Baxter	5-413
						02631-000
Kyle Gibson	Sr. Specialist	5/22/00	yes	T.Graham	Dan Houston	5-413
						00834-000
Joll Henenberg	Director	5/22/00	yes	H.
				McLoughlin	Mary Solmonson	5-413
						02372-000
Shona Wilson	Director	5/22/00	yes	K.Melodick	Sally Beck	5-413
						00813-000
Dempsey, Dalton	Specialist	5/17/00	no	K.Melodick	George Smith	5-413
						00720-000


section 13.1 requires a letter of credit.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Carlos Sole/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001 09:01 PM -----

	Ann Elizabeth White@ECT
	05/21/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Carlos Sole
		 cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

I'm leaving on vacation after tomorrow for 2 1/2 weeks and there's no way I
can get to this before I leave.  Would you please handle this for me in the
interim?  If not, please talk to Kay about who could handle this for Greg in
my absence.  It may just need to go to outside counsel.

Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
05:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           05/21/2001 04:21 PM

To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

I will review this, but one of you needs to also.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------

Greg Krause@ENRON
05/21/2001 04:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement

Please see attached for your review and comments.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/19/2001
12:59 PM ---------------------------

"RED Index Team" <distribution@caem.org> on 07/18/2001 01:01:03 PM
Please respond to <netkin@caem.org>

To: <Steven_J_Kean@enron.com>

cc:

Subject: RED Index shows Texas, NY, and Maine advance on retreating
Pennsylvania

Note to Steven Kean

The July Update to the Retail Energy Deregulation Index (RED Index),
published twice a year by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
(CAEM) shows Texas, Maine, and New York are making the most measurable
strides in promoting sustainable competition among electricity providers, as
customers throughout Pennsylvania retreat to their default providers due to
increasing wholesale prices.

The RED Index, which is the only known tool that objectively ranks states by
22 attributes on how they are restructuring their power markets, today
released the U.S. rankings for all 50 states and the District of Columbia,
in a 187 page report.  Key results included:
   1. Pennsylvania      66
   2. Texas         65
   3. New York         64
   4. Maine         62
   17. California         34

"These numbers underscore the importance of building a healthy foundation on
which electric competition can grow," said Ken Malloy, CEO of the Center.

"While California's crisis has brought a lot of positive attention to
Pennsylvania's model, many customers in the Keystone State are returning to
their original utility suppliers.  It underscores how important it is to put
the right fundamentals in place if consumers and suppliers are to benefit
over the long haul," Malloy said.

In rankings that included all of North America, the province of Alberta
actually would rank above all the states with a score of 68.

The mid-year RED Index also found that 62% of states expressing an opinion
indicated that their commission is not "less likely to take action on energy
restructuring as a result of the California crisis."

CAEM is an independent, nonprofit, think tank based in Washington, DC whose
mission is to promote an effective transition from the monopoly to the
competitive model of regulation.

For information about obtaining a copy of the RED Index, go to www.caem.org.

For more information, please contact:
Nancy Etkin at 703-532-6887 or netkin@caem.org

If you do not wish to receive announcements from CAEM, please put "remove"
in the subject line in a reply to this email.
477


We can uninvite steffes, hain, denne, kingerski, comnes if having them on
presents any problems.  I hadn't included Marcie on the call, but would be
happy to include her, too.  just let me know.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000 12:38 PM -----

	Sandra McCubbin
	11/06/2000 12:35 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Call In Number re: Wright Meeting

according to Paul, this is to be an internal call only except for Mike, Paul
and Marcie


Tracy:

Tanya handled this last go round.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 05:01 PM -----

	Chris H Foster
	12/12/2000 03:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Arco Transaction

Arco has surfaced again.  They are looking at buying a fixed price for term.
I will be out for a few days.  Kim Ward will be handling this transaction in
my abscence.  Her extension is x3826.  I am assuming that we can use the
short form of ISDA we used previously.  I am assuming we are OK on credit for
up to 1 year.  If longer wie will double check with Tracy.  Please contact me
and let me now if this is OK.

Chris


Greetings:

The governor will be holding a press conference and availability at 4:00
today to supposedly discuss the QF and Blackouts issues.  There are no
written documents or available materials at this time.  We do understand
that it will be satellite unlinked so there is a chance some stations may
carry it live.  If you have access to the Internet or squawk box you can
listen into room 1190- no guarantee they will be airing the press
conference.

This is all based or rumor and research and the Governor's office has not
confirmed anything.

In the event there is a press conference IEP will be orchestrating a
response immediately.

We will keep you posted.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Hi Marc!

Yes, we're having a few friends over Sat. night for "Holiday Cheer" which at
our house means cocktails by the Christmas tree and maybe some of my
wonderful-tasting but horrible-for-you egg nog.  We'd love to see you guys.
It's just an 8 to 10 kind of thing so even if you have other parties to go
to, you could make this one the kick-off.

The extent of FABULOUS in our Y2K plans is in the price of the bottle of
champagne we're going to share at home that night.  I asked T if we should
plan anything and got the "quiet night at home" reply.  That, of course, will
change to "Why didn't you plan anything?!" around 12/29 or 30.

How's BMC?  What are you doing for them?  Do you know Clayton Williams?  I
think he still works there.

Give us a call so we can catch up.  Tell G we said hi & hope to see you
Saturday!


i will let you out of the bet for $20


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042005.txt


Sorry I haven't responded. I left early yesterday and have been big time busy
today. I am still pretty sick.

I'll write back soon.


The new California Scheduling sheet is located at

P:\Trading\California\EES\joh2\SCH

There are 2 sheets, one for Newco and one for the Estate.  If you could please test out the Estate sheet and make sure it correlates correctly with the current old sheet, that would be greatly appreciated.  Both sheets point to different databases.

There is still the known "holiday bug" where all holidays from 2002 and on will not show up correctly.  THis will be fixed in the new upcoming sheet.

The Newco sheet seems to work but there is no valid data in the Enpower database (all data for newco in the Enpower database has been truncated).  Hopefully, Phil and I will have the new system up and running before we have to revert back to the old Newco sheet.

John Oh
Enron North America		503.464.5066
121 SW Salmon Street		503.701.1160 (cell)
3WTC 0306			503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204			John.Oh@Enron.com


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 08:49 AM -----

	dramage@bassberry.com
	05/17/2000 03:11 PM

		 To: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

 <<2105231.01>>

 - 2105231.01


To:???? Greg Whalley
Email:? Greg.Whalley@enron.com
Date:?? May 18, 2001
From:?? Loraine Crutchfield
Re:???? LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean Gas Supply Conference

Thank you for agreeing to speak at the LNG's Role in North American &
Caribbean Gas Supply Conference.? Below, you will find deadlines for
materials due to conference management, your presentation title, date of your
presentation, presentation time from beginning to end, duration and question
& answer time.? You may simply email the materials to me directly at
lcrutchfield@zeusdevelopment.com.? If you feel any of this information is
incorrect, please feel free to call me.?

Due Dates:????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Materials Due:? ??????? ???????
Format:
May 25, 2001??? ??????? ??????? ??????? Speaker Photograph????? ??????? Tif
or Jpeg
May 25, 2001??? ??????? ??????? ??????? Biography?????? ??????? ???????
Microsoft Word or text format
May 29, 2001??? ??????? ??????? ??????? Abstract??????? ??????? ???????
Microsoft Word or text format
June 13, 2001?? ??????? ??????? ??????? Presentation??? ??????? ??????? Power
Point preferred

Future of Enron's Principal-Based Exchange
October 24, 2000
From - 10:30 AM to 11:00 AM
Duration? - 0:15
Presentation Time - 15 minutes Q & A? -

Thank you again for being part of LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean
Gas Supply, I am looking forward to meeting you in Arlington, Virginia.?
Complete details regarding hotel accommodations, tour information and the
conference agenda are available online at www.lngexpress.com.

Thank You,

Loraine Crutchfield
Zeus Development Corporation
832-200-3705
lcrutchfield@zeusdevelopment.com


You are cordially invited to attend an overview session provided by the ENA
Human Resource department regarding the Performance Evaluation Process
(PEP).  Employees who have not attended any previous PEP training or new
managers are strongly encouraged to attend this session.  However, all are
invited to attend.

What:   Overview of the Performance Evaluation Process
When:  Monday, October 30, 2000
   12:00-1:30 p.m. or 3:00 - 4:30 p.m.
   OR
   Tuesday, October 31, 2000
   10:00-11:30 a.m. or 12:00-1:30 p.m.
Where:  Doubletree (next to 2 Allen Center),  De Zavala Conference Room
Available seating: 50  per session
Bring your lunch. Drinks  and cookies will be provided.
If you are unable to attend, there will be a Technical and a Process guide
available through the web base site http://pep.corp.enron.com.  Also, there
is a PEP Help Desk hotline of (713)853-4777 option 4 should you have any
questions during the evaluation process.


This request has been pending approval for  4 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081004&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081004
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/15/02 12:45:53 PM
Requested For       : randal.frisbie@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Yes, I'll be in Death Valley hoping that the weather is as gorgeous as it is
today.  Dinner sounds great but I can't get together until after my
VACATION.  So let's shoot for after October 15.  By the way, I heard that Joe
Manascalco died.  Also, are you still interested in the LSU mineral law
institutes?  Have fun in N.O.  Sara

	"R. Carson Llewellyn" <carlew@flash.net>
	09/27/2000 03:35 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tigers

Sara:

 I found a nice restaurant in the Village that I would like to go to
with you and Donna one evening next week if you guys are up for it. I am
heading to New Orleans this weekend for some nice food and to see some
old friends. Are you going to the Tigers vs. Tennessee game Saturday
night?

Carson


SEPTEMBER CLASSES

 Working Styles: Working With People Effectively - September 19  (4 hour
session)  Cost:  $300.00
This module helps participants understand how they perceive others and how
others perceive them on the basis of behavioral clues. It also discusses what
they can learn from those clues about working together effectively.  As a
result,  participants will experience less interpersonal tension with members
of the team or work unit.
 Communicating Effectively - September 19, & 20  (4 hour sessions)
Cost:  $200.00
Participants will learn the skills that facilitate and promote good
communication, as well as the behaviors that indicate a willingness to
communicate with others. As a result of the module, participants will have
new models and tools that enhance their willingness and ability to
communicate in the workplace.
 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance - September 21 & 22   Cost:  $700.00
This program is designed to provide managers, professionals, technical and
staff personnel a basic understanding of finance and accounting principles
that are imbedded in Enron equity transactions.   This program is also a good
refresher in Finance and Accounting before taking the Applied Finance
program.
 Applied Finance - September 28 & 29    Cost:  $700.00
If a basic understanding of Enron equity transactions (deals) will help you
do your job better, this course is for you.  This course will help you
understand how ENA structures deals, the "deal space", and how the financial
principals discussed relate to ENA deals.
 FranklinCovey Project Managment: An Approach That Really Works*** -
September 27   Cost:  $300.00
This is a one-day introductory program designed for those who have never had
project management training before.  This course will meet the needs of
people who need to handle multiple small projects, with typically less than
100 tasks.

***Pilot Class

For registration or more information, please click here () to go directly
into the Development Center "Ernie", or call 3-0357.


Here you go Lawrence.  Thanks again for the invitation.  We would like to
participate in hearings such as this.  I may be at the hearing on Monday,
but I'm not the FERC expert.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mona

(See attached file: skean FERC comments.doc)

 - skean FERC comments.doc


Paul:

Further to my earlier email:

Do you want to request the language which we have devised for (1) hedge fund
monthly account statements and (2)  quarterly/annual engineering reserve
reports?

Please call to discuss.  Caroline says she may be transacting today.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 10:11 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	04/23/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Paul Radous/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Valentis

Paul:

  With respect to Valentis:

 (a)  Does the MAC apply to both S&P and Moody's?  (not clear from worksheet)
 (b)  Are the financial covenants Events of Default or Termination Events?
(looks like these were Termination Events in AIG)
 (c)  Is this deal two-way margining?  You have set 0 Thresholds but
indicated Return/Delivery for both parties.  Our discussion of last week may
have changed (we discussed one-way margining for CP only).

I'll have the same questions for CD Holdings.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


All of these deals had their facilities changed by logistics on the last two
days.  I have reiterated to Lisa Kinsey the importance of her group letting
us know when they make a change in facility.  All of these were physical
basis trades, so they came at contract - the desk price difference is not
more than .04 on any of the deals.  OA therefore should be minimal.
PL


I agree.  I hope that the first decision point, perhaps this week, answers
the "if" question.  Then, perhaps by the end of the month, if the answer to
"if" is "yes," we can then answer the "when" question.

JW

-----Original Message-----
From: Donnelly, Paul [mailto:Paul.Donnelly@bakeratlas.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:59 AM
To: 'jwatson@bigfoot.com'; Dennis Dye (E-mail)
Subject: I heard 3 Italian Maybe's

I still think we're GO, but I heard Dorothy and Kim do the "it depends on
Enron" and Janell has the broken leg issue.  Hopefully it all works out
well.  We're not at the deadline yet but at some point we'll have to make a
call.

The first hurdle is the U of H accelerated Italian course in mid February
which I plan to attend unless we've aborted.  The real deadline is somewhere
around D-30 days when the air fare/schedule becomes harder to get.

Paul Donnelly
Quality Manager, HTC
713-625-6679 phone


Per Matt, I have entered annuity deal# 872229.1 (STWROCK paying LTSW $2 MM) due to the revaluation of index option deal #804470.  Deal date 11/15/01.  Please let me know if you have any questions on the annuity entered.

Thanks,
Fran
503.464.7973

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Law, Samantha
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 9:16 PM
To:	Motley, Matt; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Salisbury, Holden
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John; Chang, Fran; Dunton, Heather; Warner, Nicholas
Subject:	UAMPS deal transfer

Please note that there is a new deal entered today to transfer the BOM portion of the UAMPS deal from LT-SW to ST-WR per Matt's request. The deal details are:

Index-Option: 807382.1
Term: 10/8/01 - 10/31/01
(we use the same method to pick the hours as we use for the CSU option)
The MTM value calculated from this deal for ST-WR is $30,685.

For Monday strip:
Index-Forward: 807382.2
Term: 10/8/01 - 10/8/01
HE 11 - 10mws
HE 12-14  -  25mws
per Holden.

The BOM strips for the index-option deal #804470 in LT-SW have been zeroed out.

An annuity deal #807428 was entered for the difference between $2.5 MM (per Matt) and $30,685 = $2,469,315, for LT-SW Buy from ST-WR.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Samantha


Someone I know just put in a bid on priceline for a long weekend in colorado
and got tickets for $185 RT.  If we get enough people together and everyone
is flexible we could use priceline.

-e


I am contacting you on the recommendation of Pug Winokur, who is on our Board
of Directors.    Enron has formed an Advisory Council which consists of
academicians, public policy thinkers and media, together with Enron
executives.  I would like to invite you to address the group on E-Commerce
issues at our next meeting  (Friday, September 8th in Houston).

Attached is a list of our Advisory Council members.

I think you will find this group interesting and thought provoking.

Please contact me at your earliest convenience at 713-853-1586.


Vince, thank you so much for speaking to the Houston Energy Group credit
managers this week.  I know you are very busy and I sincerely appreciate
your taking the time to meet with us.

Gayle C. Hayter
Credit Risk Management
Natural Gas and Power
Phone: 281 293 3594
Fax: 281 293 6947


Should we set up a meeting next week w/ the coal guys and Indiana counsel? Do
you want me to come?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 09:28 AM -----

	Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/05/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NIPSCO

Richard,

Wanted to drop a line to see if you had any word/guidance on the
termination/dispute language.  Can you call me early next week?

KJM


Please put this on my calendar, thanks

fletch

---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
05:05 PM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 05:41 PM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Karen
Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal
Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dinner Invitation - April 10, 2001 (For Trading Track)

You are cordially invited to attend cocktails and dinner on April 10, 2001 at
La Colombe d'Or restaurant located at 3410 Montrose Blvd (a map can be found
at www.lacolombedor.com).  Cocktail hour will start at 7:00 pm with dinner to
follow.

Please note:  this dinner is for the Trading Track Program.

Please RSVP to Ted Bland at extension 3-5275 before April 6, 2001.


How much is this hot date gonna set me back - $2,000???

"Germany, Mary/COR" <mgermany@CH2M.com> on 04/07/2000 05:12:51 PM
To: "'Chris Germany'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hmm

I sent this picture on to the girls I know.  Laura is a recruiter and she
said she will jump right on it.  Get ready for a hot date.

Mary Germany, Manager
Accounts Payable
Payroll
Accounting Support
(303) 713-2151
fax (303) 846-2151
email - mgermany@ch2m.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Germany [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: April 06, 2000 12:33 PM
To: mgermany@CH2M.com
Subject: Hmm

As always, they catch me at my most beautiful pose.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2000
01:32 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron North America Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Kimberly Brown
 pic25134.pcx) 04/06/2000 12:00 PM

To:   Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

(See attached file: 021_19.jpg)


Louise,

Please see below for the GTV II project weekly status update and the attached file for the updated project timelines.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Dave Nommensen, Russ Severson, Narasim Kasaru, Jay Krish.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physcial deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process & its unit testing have been completed.
o	Changes for the view aggregation has been completed.
o	Changes for the position manager are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Establishing communication between TDS client & Sitara server & its testing has been completed.
o	Other IT items are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to TDS deal valuation are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).
o	Creating GDI Calc in ERMS is in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Development of live feeds has been completed and handed over to the user for testing.

Plans for the week ending 4/6/01:
?	Continue the development of GTV-II phase 1.
?	Finalize the requirements for GTV-II, Phase 2.

Issues:
None

Regards.

Zhiyong


Attached is the Red Rock weekly report for your use and file.

Mark Lavine
Enron Transportation Services - ECN4679A
Phn : 713-345-8424
Fax : 713-646-8032
mark.lavine@enron.com


Hello Everyone,

Please see the attached EnronOnline Europe Marketing Reports for May 23, 2001.

Executive Summary:				w/e 5/23/01		           w/e 5/16/01

Regards,
Jennifer Oliver


Ray,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Dear Sir,
Lehman is proud to present its flagship product, the Lehman Ten Uncommon
Values.  Please feel free to call or e-mail with any questions.
					All the best!!
			Greg Manning

 <<10letter.pdf>>
Greg Manning
Senior Vice President
Lehman Brothers
(212) 681 7988
Toll Free: (888) 599 3902
gmanning@lehman.com

This information has been obtained from various sources; we do not represent
that this information (including , but not limited to: prices, quotes and
statistics) is complete or accurate and it should not be relied on as such.
All information is subject to change, without notice.  This document is
provided for informational purposes only and should not be regarded as an
offer to sell or as a; solicitation of an offer to buy any product to which
this information relates.  The information contained in this facsimile/email
message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipients  named above.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return
the original message to us by email.  Thank you

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - 10letter.pdf


Hi Rose,

I hate to be a pain, but we are trying to sign up Northwestern this week, and
the last thing we have to do is the assignment and assumption agreement.  Any
break in the log jam with McKay?

Kay


Jim,

The proposed structure chart I sent you a few days ago has changed following
some comments received from lawyers and commercial people. I attach the new
version. The changes are in groups 1 to 3 which have been rearranged, both in
terms of work allocation and people.

I am also proposing, as part of the same exercise, to make 5 new assistant
general counsels:

Mark Elliott
Robert Quick
Martin Rosell
Sarah Gregory
Marcus Von Bock .

Please let me know if you would like to discuss any of this.

      Mark


1.  As discussed I added that BuySideDirect is the counterparty prior to
trade affirmation and the our clearing firm will clear and settle the trade
in Section 5.2.  And as discussed with WPG, your credit risk after trade
affirmation is your prime broker.

2.  We can agree to your requested on arbitration.  Namely,
 A.  New York Law
 B.  Silent on jurisdiction
 C.  Choice of either NASD or AAA arbitration
Please send me the appropriate language for insertion into the agreement.

3.  Let's discuss this concept of consequential damages further.

Regards,

Mike
415-369-5016

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Minnich [mailto:minnich@imarkets.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 4:58 PM
To: Mike.Fowler@enron.com
Cc: jpeters@andrews-kurth.com; sara.shackleton@enron.com;
Lisa@Buysidedirect. Com
Subject: RE: Enron-BuySideDirect Agreement

I made the two remaining changes:

1. added limits on clearly erroneous policy time limits.  We will promptly
notify other side and will make a decision within 4 hours of the issue being
raised or by 6PM whichever is sooner.
2. deleted first sentence from 5.4

I am still trying to get further resolution from WPG with regard to your
insert #6.

Please call with any questions.

Regards,

Mike
415-369-5016

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike.Fowler@enron.com [mailto:Mike.Fowler@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:06 AM
To: minnich@imarkets.com
Cc: mike.fowler@enron.com; jpeters@andrews-kurth.com;
sara.shackleton@enron.com; Lisa@Buysidedirect. Com; minnich@imarkets.com
Subject: Re: Enron-BuySideDirect Agreement

In case I did not specify this previously, with regard to time limits for
the clearly erroneous policy, I would encourage you to consider both 1)
counterparty notification that a trade is being questioned and 2)
resolution.

Thanks.

Mike

"Michael Minnich" <minnich@imarkets.com> on 09/12/2000 07:00:10 PM

Please respond to <minnich@imarkets.com>

To:   <mike.fowler@enron.com>, <jpeters@andrews-kurth.com>,
      <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
cc:   "Lisa@Buysidedirect. Com" <lisa@buysidedirect.com>,
      <minnich@imarkets.com>

Subject:  Enron-BuySideDirect Agreement

I apologize for the delay.  I made the changes as discussed except:

1.  I did not put a limit on the Clearly erroneous policy--not because I
didn't agree, but because I did not see an obvious answer in the Nasdaq
agreement.  I will look at it more tomorrow, but I wanted to get this to
you
rather than delay further.
2.  Striking first sentence in 5.4--I have not heard back from our lawyers.
Hopefully tomorrow.

Also, I attach the broker dealer attachment 2 which you said you didn't
have.

I think we resolved most of your WPG questions.  WPG is OK with all of your
changes except Insert 6.  I will try to get further resolution as to why
they object so that you can negotiate further if you like.

If all goes well, hopefully this can be wrapped up tomorrow.

Regards,

Mike

___________________________________________
BuySideDirect LLC a subsidiary of
Intelligent Markets, Inc.

410 Jessie Street, Suite 602
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 369-5016 direct
(415) 369-5020 sales
(415) 369-5010 fax
minnich@imarkets.com

(See attached file: Enron BuySideDirect Subscriber Agreement, Dated August
25, 2000.doc)
(See attached file: Enron BuySideDirect Subscriber Application, Version
August 25, 2000.doc)
(See attached file: BuySideDirect Attachment 2.DOC)

 - Enron BuySideDirect Subscriber Agreement, Dated August 25, 2000.doc


Ken

I understand a Turkish industrialist named Nuri ?olakoglu has been in contact with you through Bill Miller and possibly Jerry Giest.  Colakoglu is an extremely wealthy and well regarded Turkish industrialist who has aggressively expanded into the Turkish energy sector.

We have had a number of meetings with Colakoglu over the years and although we appreciate his potential prospects for the future we do not see a win-win opporutnity with his organization at this time.  We expect he may try and contact you so wanted to let you know in advnace the background on his proposal.

Colakoglu has proposed that, in order to manage our Trakya payment issue, Enron utilize the Arcos turbines to build, on balance sheet, a 1200 MW power plant at the tailgate of his recently completed specualtive LNG regas facility in Turkey.  The plant would be part of a comprehensive proposal to the Turkish Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources to reduce the prices at Trakya, in exchange for an agreement by TETTA? (the new Turkish power trading company resulting from the split up of TEA?, the former electricity monopoly) to purchase power from the new facility. All three plants would be fuelled by LNG provided by Enron and tolled through the Colakoglu's regas facility.

In essence, Nuri wants us to build a power station as soon as possible to use the capacity at his LNG terminal which is now idle and has the potential to be a white elephant.

Our team has explained to Colakoglu  that they thought the fact that the proposal relied totally on TETTA?'s credit was fatal, but that they would discuss it with EEL management.

Lloyd Wantschek has responded to Colakoglu in the attached letter (we have highlighted the relevant portion for your information).


This looks ok to me.


Contact Andy Rowe at 713 966 2107.
They are a medium term fundamental energy player.  They have never indicated
any interest in anything besides nymex or hub gas daily, but that may
change.  They have interest in trading on EOL but have not gotten approval
yet.

Caroline Abramo@ENRON
01/28/2001 03:37 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: smith barney AAA

John- can you give me the name of your business line contact there, job
function and phone number?  Also, whatever you know about their trading
style- are they macro, program, technical?  Would they be interested in the
same service we give Tudor, i.e do they want a salesperson to bring them
ideas from our various trading groups??  Do they want to trade on-line or are
they already??

Based on what you come back with, I'll give a call over there and see how I
can resurrect the ISDA negotiations and get them trading...

Talk to you Monday,
CA


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/9/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 2,541.
1/9/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 26,820.
1/9/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,228,498.
1/9/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 131,194
1/9/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 2,305,789.


Heather,

This is a rough cut of a services agreement.  Since the loan agreement,
services agreement and LLC agreement are all pieces of the same puzzle, I
thought I would send it your way.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000 06:35
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/19/2000 11:45 AM

To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Services agreement

This is a very rough draft based on an agreement done previously with a jv
company.  I'm sending it for Enron review only, since I haven't even read the
entire thing yet.  I thought you might want to take a look at it to see what
you think, and to consider the scope of the services to be provided.

As for legal services, one alternative would be to have the services provided
by an outside law firm, not associated with either principal.

Could you forward me what you received from Clement regarding the corporate
guaranty issue?  I would like to see what's the latest in that regard.

Thanks,

Kay


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.