Karen--regarding press at the WGA event.  There is an opening media conference on Sunday afternoon the 12th and a closing conference on Tuesday afternoon the 14th.  There are only about 20 press types registered to date.  That may change, however, if they get the high profile folks that they are hoping for.  Apparently they are still waiting confirmation on Galye Norton, who they are hoping will be the keynote on  Sunday afternoon.

The governor attendance list is as follows:	Kitzhaber (OR), Kempthorne (Idaho), Hull(AZ), Leavitt(UT), Hoeven (ND), Johnson (NM), Paul's friend Kenny Guinn from Nevada, Geringer(WY), Janklow(SD),Johnannes(NE), Martz(MT).    Aparently Colorada Governor Owens just cancelled this morning, and my understanding is that it has something to do with President Bush being in Denver on the 14th.   California/Washington/Texas/Alaska/Kansas will be represented by someone in each govs office, but not the govs themselves.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	research meeting re: asian options EB3127

Date:		2/6/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Pretty quiet on the EcoGas/Kafus front...... whats up?

Regards
Delainey


Here it is


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

ANITAREED@aol.com on 07/18/2000 11:03:23 AM
To: Randall.L.Gay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: 2nd for Kathleen, Fwd: Islander

This is my response.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ANITAREED@aol.com>
From: ANITAREED@aol.com
Full-name: ANITAREED
Message-ID: <cc.7782905.26a5b134@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:10:12 EDT
Subject: Re: Islander
To: Mkbass1@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 106

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the update.  Unfortunately, the Civic Club is unable to run the
article in The Islander, because of its political nature.  President Kathleen
Gay reviewed the article, as it was previously written, and advised me last
night that it is against Civic Club policy and bylaws to be involved in
political issues.

If you have questions or comments, please contact Kathleen.

Anita Reed


As discussed


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001
07:33 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera                           04/09/2001 08:26 PM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)

Subject: Some funnies

-Had to share these...SRS

 - airolane.jpg
 - bombtech.jpg
 - fortune.jpg
 - hotdog.jpg
 - watchp.jpg
 - newad.jpg


Kay, make sure Mark knows when you are scheduling these QBR's so that he can
ensure the package is ready - some of these are coming up next week.

Regards
Delainey


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wright, Alice
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Fitzgerald, Genia; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Hansen, Leslie; Mann, Kay; McCullough, Travis; Moore, Janet H.; Murphy, Harlan; Nettelton, Marcus; Portz, David; Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Wright, Alice; Yoder, Christian; Haldeman, Sandy; Keesler, Martha; King, Jan M.; Simmons, Linda J.; Zucha, Theresa
Subject:	Power Trading Group Meeting MOVED
Importance:	High

Good morning,

The 10:00 a.m. Power Trading Group Meeting is being rescheduled for 2:00 p.m. today in EB3872.      Please plan to attend and we apologize for any inconvenience.    Thanks.

Alice Wright
Enron Wholesale Services - Legal
1400 Smith St., EB3809A
Houston, Texas 77002
Tel:  713-853-5438
Fax: 713-646-3491
alice.wright@enron.com


Could either of you provide an address of the location of the data room?

Thanks, LD

-----Original Message-----
From: Hawkins, Don
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:42 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly; McConnell, Mark
Cc: Stephens, LD; Ames, Mike; Campbell, Larry; Kendrick, William; McGee, Johnny; Crump, Michael; Pribble, Dan; Brassfield, Morris; Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Martin, Jerry D.
Subject: Southern Trails Due Diligence

Kim, Mark listed below are the ETS Operations employees that will participate in the Southern Trails due diligence October 29th and 30th in Salt Lake City, Utah.

	L.D. Stephens - Team Leader/Operations
	Larry Campbell - Environmental
	???????? - ROW (To be determined by Johnny McGee and communicated directly to you)
	Mike Ames - Pipeline Safety

As discussed, these employees will arrive in Salt Lake, Sunday evening, October 28th prepared to go to the data room Monday 29th and Tuesday 30th.  They will return to their respective home locations Wednesday morning, October 31st.

Please provide a Questar contact person and address of the data room.  If you could also provide the name of a hotel close to the data room, it would be appreciated.
Names of other Enron parties participating in the due diligence and where they are staying would be helpful.  Any specific limitations imposed upon the data room review
should be communicated as soon as possible.

Morris Brassfield (Operations Support) and Jerry Martin (E&C) have determined that it is not necessary for them to have personnel attend the data room.  The operations team will retrieve as much information as possible to support their needs.  It was also my understanding no one from Planning and System Optimization would participate.

As I will be out of town the rest of the week, please communicate directly with these individuals via e mail.  If you need to need to contact me, I can be reached at 713-303-2764.

Don


Greg:

If you are obtaining additional original signatures on the Letter Agreement
to accommodate Freshfield's request, I would appreciate you getting one more
original signed by PPL for Enron's files, as we have only a fax copy of
PPL's signature on the Letter Agreement.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:16 AM
To: 'Campbell, Carolyn'
Cc: VAN DUSEN, Nicholas; Kay Mann (E-mail); Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Pegasus - Closing Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

The lenders have specifically asked for an original of the Letter Agreement.
If it is really problematic to get another 2 copies signed, I can ask them
again if they will accept a copy.  I appreciate that there are only 2
parties to the document, but the lenders' reasoning is that the Letter
Agreement is a key underlying document and as such, they would expect to
have an original.  Also, our original arrangement was that we would sign 6
originals of each relevant document so that all parties could have
originals.

I know what a pain it is to get documents re-executed and I apologize that
this request has come so late in the day.

Regards
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn [mailto:CCampbell@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:04 PM
To: 'PARKER, Isabel'
Cc: VAN DUSEN, Nicholas; Kay Mann (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Pegasus - Closing Documents

Isabel:

ENA signed two originals of the Letter Agreement (as the Letter Agreement
has only two parties).  I kept one for ENA and provided the other to Greg
Lang for PPL by letter dated May 2, 2001.  I still do not have an original
of PPL's signature, but Greg Lang did provide a fax copy.    Is it necessary
for the parties to sign additional copies for non-parties?   I am checking
with ENA on the GE documents.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
<mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com> ccampbell@kslaw.com

-----Original Message-----
From: PARKER, Isabel [mailto:isabel.parker@freshfields.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Carolyn Campbell (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: VAN DUSEN, Nicholas
Subject: Pegasus - Closing Documents

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents
to any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for
your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

The lenders have informed us that they would also like to have at least one
original of the GE Guaranty.
Please let us know whether this will be possible.  In addition, could you
please let us know how many originals of the Letter Agreement were signed?
The lenders also need an original of this document.

Thank you in advance
Isabel

Isabel Parker
T  +1 212 277 4025
F  +1 212 277 4001
E  isabel.parker@freshfields.com
520 Madison Avenue
34th Floor
New York, NY 10022
www.freshfields.com

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Please consider the distribution list of this email as the Enron working group for the CSFB Prepay.  I have included James Moran at CSFB and ask that James advise us as to the individuals within CSFB that should receive documents.

Mary Cook, in coordination with Sara Shackleton, hopes to distribute this evening a marked copy of the swap confirmations that address the margin issues that were discussed today.

Term, rates, amount, and settlement dates will be blank but will need to address the expanded transaction.  The existing $150 will mature in one year while the incremental $200 will mature the first week of April 2002.  The confirmations will be based on the CSFB International Master ISDA agreement.  We will have to determine the optimal method to address the CSFB Cayman Island entity.

James Moran:

We would like to schedule a time with your internal counsel as early as possible on Tuesday to discuss the modifications.  Please advise us as to availability.

Treasa:

We have a call scheduled for 7:30 am Houston time with Houston (Paul Garcia) and London (Ann Hicks) cash management to discuss the funds flow mechanics.

Could you confirm with your traders the appropriate settlement period and any limitations of the existing deal.  I assume that we have to price the existing $150 and the incremental $200 on September 26 to settle on Friday September 28.   There can be no slippage.

Could you also distribute a draft of the prepay script?

Mary and Sara:

We will need to confirm who will be executing the documents for Enron, confirms as well as corporate guaranty?

Mary Perkins:

I will need to update you as well and discuss some other aspects of the transaction.

My contact information is below.  My home phone number is 281-480-5968.

Dan O. Boyle
Vice President
Enron Global Finance
Phone:        713-853-1532
Mobile:        713-417-3532
Pager:         877-390-2838
Skytel PIN:  880FBF5


Steve: Per your instructions, Chris and I met and discussed your comments
last week regarding the Fontheim proposal to provide representation to Enron
at the rate of $10,000 per month plus expenses (these should be quite
minimal) from date of execution through the balance of the year.

Claude Fontheim is well known in Washington and did serve in a trade capacity
early in the Clinton Administration. Chris and I have know two of his
operatives Sally Painter and Ken Levinson for several years. Sally was the
deputy director of the DOC business liason office and later with Tenneco and
Ken was legislative director to Senator Rockefeller. We believe they have a
good reputation and provide professional representation of the highest
quality.

While their strength as Chris and I see it is there relationships in the
Clinton-Gore White House, they are particularly close to the New Democrats
(trade and commerce supporters in Congress) and have good ties into the
environmental community. They have made various suggestions to us in the past
and offered advice both of which have been useful to Enron. Therefore, while
we have been discussing their value in our desire to have good ties with the
Gore organization which they have, Chris and I also see value they can bring
to other issues of importance to Enron including the electricity
restructuring legislation.

We recommend them and await your decision.

Joe


In a meeting with Louise Kitchen today, she mentioned that Bob Superty was
very impressive in a presentation that he made to the Peoples Energy Board of
Directors on Wednesday.  She was very complimentary.  I have let Bob know
about Louise's praise.  Thought that you would like to know as well.
--Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 05:52 PM
---------------------------

Robert Superty
04/05/2001 04:53 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Peoples presentation

Sally, Bob  FYI (or your files) - here is the presentation I gave to the
Peoples Energy Board of Directors.

Let me know if you have any questions - Bob


Mark:

Only your self-evaluation form is attached.  Please e-mail or fax the others
to me as soon as possible.  As you know, the PRC meeting starts at 8:30 a.m.
Central time on Tuesday.  The fax number is 713 646 2600.

	Mark Evans/Enron@EUEnronXGate
	06/04/2001 12:26 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENRON EUROPE LEGAL VPS: SELF ASSESSMENT FORMS

Mark,

the attached fax comprises the forms for:

myself
Justin Boyd
Marcus Von Bock
Jon Chapman.

As you know, Mary Nell is dealt with in Kristina's PRC.

We will no doubt speak tomorrow on Jim's call. Talk to you then.

       Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  FACSys Fax Connector (EULON-MSCNX03P)
Sent: 04 June 2001 17:36
To: Evans, Mark (Legal)
Subject: Received fax from 020 7783 8014

Sender:   020 7783 8014
Received:  04 June 2001 17:30
Pages:   4
Serviced By:   FACSys server EULON-APFX1P (Device 23)
Routing Info:  38287

-------------- Fax Image -------------


Sounds good.  I believe Alain is out till Thur and I hope we meet before then.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bussell l, Kathryn
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:44 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Dominion Team

I suggest adding Alain Diza (EES scheduler) or Patricia Downey (EES VM) instead of/along with myself as they actually know something about Dominion.    :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:40 AM
To:	Barkowsky, Gloria G.; Price, Wade R.; Bussell l, Kathryn
Cc:	Mcclure, Mark; Wynne, Rita; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)
Subject:	Dominion Team

Hey there team.  We are starting to focus on Dominion pipeline and I need your help explaining the process to Shemin.  I would like to set up a meeting with Gloria, Wade, Shemin, Kathryn as soon as possible.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
05:18 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           04/30/2001 05:04 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Binomial

Vince,
Jeff Planck is part of Tracy Pan's team.

Jason
---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:03
PM ---------------------------

"Planck, Jeffrey G." <jplan90@entergy.com> on 04/27/2001 03:20:36 PM
To: "'jason.sokolov@enron.com'" <jason.sokolov@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Binomial

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Planck, Jeffrey G.
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:16 PM
> To: 'jason.sokolov@enron.com'
> Subject: Binomial
>
> Jason,
>
> This is part of our project. We would use it to estimate american premiums
> and then add that premium to valuations that give european values.
>
> I hope it goes through.
>
> Jeff
> (I'm on Tracy and Nan's team)
>
>
> .....Didn't work
>
> I'll try zipped version.
>
>  <<Big Binomial.zip>>

 - Big Binomial.zip


i think it is something we need to do.  please set it up

Caroline Abramo@ENRON
11/14/2000 11:06 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT
Subject: microphone to houston

John-

What do you think of getting a direct mic from New York to Houston as soon as
possible?  We had one at my last employer from NY to London which worked
great.  You can tun it on or off but it allows us to communicate without
getting on the darn phone - I am sure its a total annoyance to pick us up.

The steno is still a phone to me and its not recorded.

We could keep it between you and Mike.

We are getting a few more funds to trade now- some program guys among them
who will need quicker execution.  I know you and Per have discussed the idea
of them calling you direct but I think, for now, the mic is a better answer.
I can sit down with you when I am down there to discuss and give you an
update of who we are planning to trade with.

Best Rgds,
Caroline


Jen,

Great to hear from you.  Early congrats on your graduation.  Everything has
been
going well down in the Lone Star State.  I got married in September down the
Jersey
shore and everything has been going well.  We bought a house back in May.  It
needs
an incredible amount of work.  We own the ugliest house on the block, by far.

How are things in Indiana?  Are you and Paul still together?  How is he
doing?  When
is the last time you were back in Jersey?  We went back over Christmas but
only for
a couple days.  I think next year we'll go back during New Year's instead of
Christmas.
If you ever get near Texas or pass through Houston, please give us a call.
You both
are always welcome to stay at our house.  My phone # is (713) 880-4157.  My
work
# is (713) 853-6320.  Hope to hear from you soon.

Kevin


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
08:02 AM ---------------------------
From: Alhamd Alkhayat@ENRON on 12/17/2000 12:17 PM
To: alkhayat@pdq.net
cc:  (bcc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT)
Subject: gas deal

A Syrian, Egyptian and Lebanese memorandum of understanding to transport,
market natural gas
Regional, Economics, 12/16/2000
In the presence of the Lebanese prime minister Rafik al- Hariri a memorandum
of understanding was signed on Friday in Beirut between Syria, Egypt and
Lebanon on the transportation and marketing of natural gas.

On the Syrian side the memo. Was signed by minister of oil Maher Jammal and
minister of oil in Egypt Sameh Fahmi and the Lebanese side was attended by
Muhammad Abdul hamid Beydoun, the minister of energy and waters, in the
presence of the secretary general of the Syrian- Lebanese higher council Nasr
al-Kouri.

The project aims at transporting Egyptian and Syrian gas prepared for
exportation to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and European countries to market it to
meet the local demands of gas in these countries.

In a statement to pressmen following the signing ceremony, the Egyptian
minister said the pipeline worth US $ 1 billion and that it would start near
al-Arish in Egypt in Northern Egypt and run under the waters of the
Mediterranean to Lebanon and Turkey through Syria.

The Syrian minister stressed the importance of the project which constitutes
a turning point in boosting joint regional Arab co-operation and which
signifies a vivid example on integrated Arab economy.

For his part, the Lebanese minister said that this project will strengthen
the economic potentials of the participating countries and have positive
impact on their general conditions.

Alhamd Alkhayat
ENRON CORP.
+1(713)853-0315

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


I spoke to Howard Volz at CT Corporation today, and he said he sent the
renewal to DAPSA in November (their renewal date is Feb. 1 of each year) and
hasn't heard from them.  I asked him to refax the renewal notice to them.  He
said CT will not revoke the consent for about 5-6 more weeks, so we've got
some time to resolve this.  I'll keep you posted.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:10 PM -----

	Tom Ross <tross@mcnallytemple.com> 06/22/2001 05:02 PM 	   To: Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)" <Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'" <jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, dpeters@mccabeandcompany.net, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'" <paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'" <jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "Tom Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'" <billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)" <frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'" <lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)" <rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, trusso@mcnallytemple.com, sadlersa@earthlink.net, mstultz@epsa.org, rtemple@mcnallytemple.com, tracy.fairchild@edelman.com, megan.beiser@edelman.com, deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com, lchurch@epsa.org, Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, tcwillia@duke-energy.com, rwhyde@duke-energy.com, tmcmorrow@manatt.com, Suzy.L.Rodriguez@dynegy.com, ppitts@wiredworld1.com, mnobili@cal-lobby.com, sscsus@aol.com, kvellandi@pstrategies.com, kelly@hnks.com, kirk@cea.com, jbkinney@duke-energy.com  cc:   Subject: Smutny Letter to Senator Dunn

June 22, 2001

The Honorable Joseph Dunn
Chair, Senate Select Committee
California State Senate
Room 2080
California State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Senator Dunn:

Earlier this year, you met individually with IEP and various other parties to explain the purpose of the Senate Select Committee?s hearing and the process under which they were to be conducted.  You made it very clear that you were planning to have fact-finding hearings based upon fundamental fairness and due process.  You made a further commitment that there would be no surprises.  Prior to today, the hearings have been conducted consistent with that representation.

Unfortunately, today it appears that the Committee has set a new course that radically departs from these previous commitments.  Today, the Committee is hearing testimony from several surprise witnesses.  These witnesses are former employees of San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) under contract with Duke Energy for an interim period during which Duke Energy operated the facilities in San Diego.   It is our understanding that these former contract employees are alleging that the company failed to properly maintain these facilities, and they are alleging that Duke Energy cycled these facilities differently than the former owner, SDG&E.  It is also our understanding that Duke Energy will not be afforded the opportunity to contemporaneously challenge these allegations and/or provide an explanation as to the operational behavior of the facilities.  In short, the hearings are being reduced to a media event, giving credence to the unsustainable allegations of disgruntled ex-employees.

Respectfully, it would appear that the Committee has wandered far afield of its stated goals.  These hearings have the potential of identifying what went wrong with California?s energy policy and how to fix it.  However, this will only occur if this inquiry is based on informal facts and complete information, not innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations.  It is the pursuit of facts, not headlines, which will solve California?s energy crisis.  These facts will be revealed only in a fair process, where allegations made are subject to contemporaneous response.

It is our hope that today?s process is an aberration, and not a departure from your commitments.  The Committee is at a crossroads.  It can choose to engage in fact-finding and analysis, or it can be reduced to a witch-hunt in pursuit of headlines.  For the benefit of all Californian?s, the Committee should focus on fact-finding and analysis.

Sincerely,

Jan Smutny-Jones
Executive Director


We've been waiting for this shoe to drop for a while.

Please read this notice (copied below and also attached); I will be contacting you next week for your thoughts on what Enron's position should be.

The very good news is the FERC is not asking the cap to be lowered; they are only asking to make it easier to raise it.

Regardless of our position, please be aware that this outcome of this case will likely be an increase in the probability that the cap could be raised above $91.87/MWh.

The earliest possible effective date of any change in methodology would probably be late November.

Alan Comnes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Investigation of Wholesale Rates of Public Utility
  Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services in the		Docket No. EL01-68-000
  Western Systems Coordinating Council

NOTICE OF TECHNICAL CONFERENCE CONCERNING
WEST-WIDE PRICE MITIGATION FOR THE WINTER SEASON
AND PROCEDURES FOR SEEKING PARTICIPATION

	(October 12, 2001)

Take notice that the Commission is convening a technical conference to be held on Monday, October 29, 2001, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.  The Technical Conference will commence at 1:00 p.m. and will be open to all interested persons.   On June 19, 2001, the Commission prescribed price mitigation for California spot markets and markets throughout the West.   In that order, the Commission also invited interested parties to file with the Commission comments and proposals for the purpose of revisiting the mitigation methodology for future periods, if necessary.  This technical conference will address possible modifications to the current West-wide price mitigation methodology for the winter season.

As a starting point for discussions at the conference, and based on the comments that were filed, possible modifications to the current price mitigation methodology include the following:  (1) eliminate the 10 percent adder for sales into California; and (2) require the California Independent System Operator to not only recalculate the price for spot market transactions when there is a Stage 1 reserve deficiency, but also recalculate the price when the average of the three gas indices increase by 10 percent above the level last used for calculating the mitigated price (i.e., 66 cents based on the current average of $6.64/MMBtu).

Persons wishing to speak at the conference must submit a request to make a statement in the above-captioned dockets.  The request should be submitted by e-mail to David Boergers at david.boergers@ferc.fed.us (include Docket No. EL01-68-000 in the subject heading of the e-mail), and should be followed up, at the same time, with a letter to the Secretary of the Commission.  The request should clearly specify the name of the person desiring to speak, his or her title and affiliation, and the party or parties the speaker represents.  There will be limited opportunity to participate via teleconferencing. Persons wanting to participate in this manner should specify their interest in their request to speak.  In addition, the request should include a telephone number for notifying the speaker.  The request should also include a brief summary of the issue or issues the speaker wishes to address, not to exceed one page.  All e-mail requests must be submitted on or before Wednesday, October 17, 2001.

The number of persons desiring to speak at the conference may exceed the time available.  Thus, interested persons are encouraged to join with other persons with
similar interests.  Based on the requests to participate, panels of speakers will be specified.  The Secretary will issue a notice listing the speakers and panels for the conference.

In addition, all interested persons are invited to submit written comments on matters addressed at the conference.  These comments should be submitted on or before November 9, 2001, in the above-captioned proceedings.  All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and will be available for inspection in the Commission's Public Reference Room at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, during regular business hours.  Additionally, all comments may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely via the Internet through FERC's Homepage using the RIMS link.  User assistance for RIMS is available at 202-208-2222, or by E-mail to rimsmaster@ferc.fed.us.

Comments related to this proceeding may be filed either in paper format or electronically.  Those filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing.

For paper filings, the original and 14 copies of the comments should be submitted to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 and should refer to Docket No. EL01-68-000.

Comments filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable Document Format, or ASCII format.  To file the comments, access the Commission's website at www.ferc.gov and click on "Make An E-Filing," and then follow the instructions for each screen.  First time users will have to establish a user name and password.  The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgment to the sender's E-mail address upon receipt of comments.  User assistance for electronic filing is available at 202-208-0258 or by E-mail to efiling@ferc.fed.us.  Comments should not be submitted to the E-mail address.

The conference will be transcribed.  Those interested in obtaining transcripts need to contact ACE Federal Reporters, at 202-347-3700.

The Capitol Connection will broadcast the conference via the Internet and by phone.  To find out more about The Capitol Connection's live Internet and phone bridge, contact David Reininger or Julia Morelli at 703-993-3100 or go to www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu.

Live and archived audio of the conference will also be available for a fee via National Narrowcast Network.  Live audio is available by telephone at 202-966-2211 and by subscription on the Web at www.hearing.com.  The Web audio will be archived and available for listening after the event is completed.  Billing is based on listening time.

Anyone interested in purchasing videotapes of the conference should call VISCOM at 703-715-7999.

Questions about the conference program should be directed to:

Camilla Ng
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20426
202-208-0706
camilla.ng@ferc.fed.us

	  David P. Boergers
	Secretary

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvarez, Ray
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell,
Rebecca W.; Fulton, Donna; Dasovich, Jeff; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes,
James D.; 'jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com'; Allen, Phillip K.; Noske, Linda
J.; Perrino, Dave; Black, Don; Frank, Robert; Miller, Stephanie;
Tycholiz, Barry; Novosel, Sarah; Thome, Jennifer; Hall, Steve C.
(Legal); Lindberg, Susan; Grigsby, Mike
Subject: FW: FERC Notice of Technical Conference on West-Wide
PriceMitigation
Importance: High

FYI.  Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Jackie Gallagher [mailto:JGallagher@epsa.org]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 4:22 PM
To: acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay,
Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe, Joe; Shelk, John;
jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray;
Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan; Hoatson,
Tom
Subject: FERC Notice of Technical Conference on West-Wide
PriceMitigation

Attached is a FERC Notice of a Technical Conference on West-Wide Price Mitigation for October 29, 2001.  This technical conference will address possible modifications to the current West-wide price mitigation methodology for the winter season.


Rick:  I'll try to remind everyone to include your name on new account requests.  Sara
P.S.  Paul represents "Enron Credit Inc."

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pizzolato, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:17 AM
To:	Lowry, Donna; Shackleton, Sara; Wall, David; Bradford, William S.; Schultz, Cassandra
Cc:	Doukas, Tom
Subject:	Seaport Group New Trading Counter Party

I just want to inform everybody that we are going to start trading with a new counter party called Seaport Group.  The employees of the counter party use to work for Amroc, which is an outfit we frequently traded with in the past.  The company is new but not the people at the organization.  If you have any question, please call.

Paul Pizzolato


Here's that video of Marty McSorly hacking that guy...
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 01:01 PM
---------------------------

Breck_Young@veritasdgc.com on 02/25/2000 02:55:05 PM
To: "McRae AP (Andrew)" <mcraeap@ucarb.com>
cc: "'ARNOTT, Kyle'" <arnottk@aol.com>, "'Chabot, Paul'"
<Paul.Chabot@Airliquide.com>, "'COUGHLIN, Tim'" <tjc@sbpa.com>, Mike
Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'LIVINGSTONE, Brian'" <brian_livingstone@ml.com>,
"'LUSSIER, Geoff'" <glussier@bdmi-ce.com>, "'MARKS, Robert'"
<rmarks@bechtel.com>, Mike Dyck <Mdyck@fimiusa.com>, "'PURCELL, Eric'"
<eepurcell@coral-energy.com>, Robert Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'WHITE, Jim'"
<jim.white@waii.com>, "'WILSON, Jeff'" <jtw@topsoe.com>, "'ZIMMERMANN,
Scott'" <scott@hastik.com>
Subject: Mitchsorely

(See attached file: mcsorley.avi)

 - mcsorley.avi


Vladi

I just found something suprising.

The starting date for settled price data for invidual curves may differ.

For Example  -- Using an effective date of 1/1/01 price data for the following curves begins on:
GDP-AECO  		4-1-01
GDP-AECO-ENRON 	2-1-01
GDP-AQUADULCE 	1-1-01
GDP-ALGONQUIN 	1-1-01

To get the data to align propely a prompt month of 4/1/01 can be used.

The earlier sheet doesn't alert you to and simply outputs the pricedata without regard to the date of the 1st available price.  The attached sheet displays the first date pricing is available (after the prompt month) if it doesn't match the prompt month.

Thanks,
Kim


>From: "John Menconi" <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
>Reply-To: <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
>To: "'Monique Sanchez'" <moshuffle@hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: you there??
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:19:51 -0600
>
>Ok, here's the deal.  An engagement retreat is part of the Catholic wedding
>sacrament preparation process.  The process general steps are.
>
>1. Meet with priest
>2. Take "Focus Tool" test.  Margie said most priests are using this tool
>for
>marriage preparation.
>3. Priest will provide us with a Marriage Encounter registration form and
>sponsor us.
>
>Margie said the retreats fill up quickly (the next available is July 19th).
>It's a weekend long retreat during which all couples attend talks and then
>go away privately to discuss how the issues discussed relate to their
>relationship.  She said the talks cover all aspects of life and marriage.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Monique Sanchez [mailto:moshuffle@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:20 PM
>To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
>Subject: RE: you there??
>
>could you call and find out when they have another one? i don't have my
>phone
>
>
> >From: "John Menconi" <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
> >Reply-To: <jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com>
> >To: "'Monique Sanchez'" <moshuffle@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: RE: you there??
> >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:17:30 -0600
> >
> >Yes, I'm here.  What's up?
> >
> >I got your "engagement encounter retreat" message and it sounds
> >interesting.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Monique Sanchez [mailto:moshuffle@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:49 PM
> >To: jmenconi@adv-eng-ser-inc.com
> >Subject: you there??
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
>http://www.hotmail.com
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/04/2001 12:06 PM -----

A meeting with Sen. Bowne's staffer Lawrence Lingbloom took place on 3.2.01
to discuss fixing the DA prohibition in AB1X.
About 30+ other interested parties attended.
On 3.1.01 Bowen's office had distributed a complex proposal; and the meeting
was convened to discuss the proposal.
The proposal distributed by Lingbloom was unacceptable and rejected but at
least it acknowledged the need to allow some level of DA, i.e., moved away
from a complete prohibition on DA.
After much discussion, Lingbloom left the meeting for a while, during which
time the group engaged in a productive discussion with CDWR/CA Dept. of
Finance.
The group asked DWR/Finance if they could agree to a program that:
a) treats bond financing costs as a nonbypassable charge designed to cover
the period during which the customer consumed power subsidized and purchased
by DWR;

b) includes an exit fee for customers switching to DA if, and only if, there
are actual costs associated with power contracts signed by DWR that might be
"stranded";

c) permits an open season for "free switching" to DA when demand exceeds the
sum of DWR's firm contract portfolio, retained generation and QF cost. This
would mean that the amount of load covered by DWR's spot purchases, plus new
load growth, should not face restrictions on Direct Access.

DWR wanted to include an agreement on information exchange, which might
include noncore customers advising DWR in advance when they will switch to DA.
In return, DWR offered to post information about their power contracts and
terms AFTER contracts were executed.
Enron's outside attorney is drafting language to capture the concepts
discussed at the 3.2.01 meeting.
The draft will be distributed and discussed on Monday, 3.5.01.


Mary, Sara and Brent:
Mark H. has asked me to join Elizabeth's group which I have agreed to do
while I continue to support Julia's group on the physical trading side.  I
plan to meet with Mark T. later this week to go over what files I will keep
and what files I will not keep.  My tentative plan is to finish all of the
day to day stuff and to hand over most of the special projects/ longer term
stuff.  With that in mind, please give some thought about who should handle
the hedge fund work, Canada back-up, the KCS VPP, coordinating our offsite
and the remaining legal/credit conferences, negotiating the Japan ISDA's (I
have created the forms and drafts of Schedules have been sent out), point
person for EIM financial trading issues, and credit derivatives back-up and
let me know what you think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


bob was canned last week.  not suprisingly.  i will try to call you guys this
weekend.


Herman Moore 31
Graham  11
Thrash   1
Mason   0


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 11:58
AM ---------------------------

Stephen Thome@ECT
04/05/2001 11:53 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: Delta - HSR Issues

We can do 50/50.

I have told Chris we will get him a final draft for signature.

Steve

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/05/2001 10:56 AM
To: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Delta - HSR Issues

Looks like our exposure is less than $25,000.  Please call me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 04/05/2001 10:50:49 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Delta - HSR Issues

-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell, Carolyn
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:40 PM
To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: Delta - HSR Issues

Kay:

I just spoke with Bill Blumenthal (our HSR expert).  He and Paul Hastings'
HSR expert have traded voice mails exchanging information, but have not yet
spoken.  Bill says that Delta is apparently relying on the "ordinary course"
exemption, which may be fine if all the LLC wants to do is hold turbines for
re-sale.  If the LLC works on development of a power plant, the analysis
would be different.  In any event, Bill agrees that the only safe thing to
do is provide now for the possible requirement to file later.

Prior to speaking with Bill, I also spoke with Greg Lang.  He agrees that we
should provide now for the possible requirement to file later.  He again
asserted that since this is "Enron's structure," Enron should agree to bear
50% of any filing fee.

Steve Thome indicated earlier today that Enron may be willing to bear half
of the filing fee.  Under current regulations, the filing fee will be $45k
if, at the time the put/call is exercised, the assets have a fair market
value of $50-100 million, and the filing fee will be $125k if, at the time
the put/call is exercised, the assets of the LLC have a fair market value of
$100-500 million.

Please let me know whether to advise Greg that Enron will accept
responsibility for half the filing fee.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Stan -- My apologies, I thought I had included you on the distribution list.  Joe
----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 06/08/2001 02:37 PM -----

	Joe Hartsoe 06/06/2001 01:48 PM 	   To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron, Stephen Veatch/FGT/Enron, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron, Bambi Heckerman/NPNG/Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron, Frazier King/FGT/Enron, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron  cc:   Subject: RP01-180 Comments on re-imposing rate caps on capacity release

Folks -- Attached for your review are the draft comments by ETS on whether the Commission should re-impose the maximum rate ceiling on short-term capacity release transactions.  Thank you for providing comments on my original draft and I have included the arguments we discussed at the Regulatory Roundtable.

According to the Federal Register, comments are due June 11.  Please provide me your comments by noon on Monday, June 11.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call  -- 202.466.9150.  Thank you.  Joe


I have a tee time at LCC for this Friday afternoon at 12:52. The first four guys to respond are in wolf.

Call me with questions.

Johnny Byrd
713-688-8850


JVD:  FYI           Rex

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novak, John
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Rogers, Rex
Subject:	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

Rex -- I don't normally pitch for my old firm, but GD&C has a pretty good group of SEC enforcement folks in their D.C. office and one of my former partners called asking if there would be any opportunity for them to assist in any way.  They understand that Enron has already retained counsel but are interested in any related representation of officers, directors, affiliates, etc.

I told them that I didn't think there was likely to be any opportunity for them at this point, but at Rob's suggestion I thought I would check with you to see if it would be useful for them to contact you.

Hope things go well for us and that we can put this behind us and move on as quickly as possible.

Regards,
	John


Steve;
David asked me to forward this to you, per your voice mail.  In addition, we
will provide each Corporate Policy Committee rep with a list of those MD,s
they will be responsible for representing.

Please don,t hesitate to contact me should you have any additional questions
or concerns.

Gina


Sara:
I have not been dealing with the confirm desk on this.  The only area that I
have been working with them on is "unexecuted confirms".
Carol

	Sara Shackleton
	05/24/2000 08:15 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Various "Morgan Stanley" master agreements

Carol:  Haven't you been speaking with the confirm desk about identifying
high volume transactions with "masterless" counterparties?  I don't want to
duplicate work efforts.  Maybe you and I can chat during the time originally
set aside for Richard (this morning).  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2000 08:12 AM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	05/23/2000 05:44 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Various "Morgan Stanley" master agreements

Definitely want to upgrade #1 - its on my list of ISDA upgrades as follows:

Done:  TXU, JAron
In Progress:  El Paso, Occidental, Reliant
To Do:  Morgan Stanley, Dynegy, Statoil, Vitol, Valero, Sempra

Can your dept provide a breakdown of type of executed masters? There are (as
of today) 423 masters - can we break out which ones are old ECT masters?
That may give us some insight in to any others that need upgrades.  Also, the
confirm desk should be able to tell us the level of activity (as they did
before) to determine priority.  Eventually, we would like to get to all of
these; however, establishing new documents where we have none (Cargill,
Mieco, Idacorp, PanCanadian) is my first priority.

Rod should be able to address #3.

Thanks,
Tanya

From: Sara Shackleton on 05/17/2000 08:48 AM
To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Various "Morgan Stanley" master agreements

As a result of Jeff Nogid's request, here is a recap of the Morgan Stanley
situation:

(1)  Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
 This is the entity for commodity trading.
 (i)  ECT has a Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated 6/16/92
 (ii)  ECTRIC has an ISDA dated 3/2/99, but eff. 8/27/97

(2)  Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc.
 Jeff Nogid requesting new master for fixed income transactions

(3)  Morgan Stanley International Limited
 This is the entity for equity trading.  Will Nogid or Kinneman ever need
this one?

Each of these companies has a different lawyer to negotiate the agreement.

Each Morgan Stanley entity might require a separate guaranty.  Anne Clark in
legal (Cap Services) will let me know.

I will put (2) in place.  Do you want to pursue upgrading (1)(i) or
addressing (3)?  Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara


did you put that on my desk?


Thank you for your thoughtfulness in celebrating boss's day yesterday.   I enjoyed having lunch with you, thought the card was very smart and will enjoy the present.   Best of all, I enjoy being a part of this wonderful group.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
12:52 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Tamarchenko
03/21/2001 09:58 AM
To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron
Subject: Re: estimating tail of distribution and additional risk measures

Naveen,
the "analytical VAR" approach is working for Equity portfolio.
It gives us the tool to examine the tails' behavior for this portfolio and
calculate "Expected Tail Loss".
The same should be done for commodities portfolio as well.

Meanwhile, as we discussed, we can give some rough estimates of the losses
corresponding to percentiles other than 5th.

Look at the figure below. You can see VAR numbers for 5%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
calculated with
1) simulations (100 thousand simulations);
2) analytical VAR (gamma-delta positions representation)

 1) and 2) are very close because there are not many options in Equity
portfolio.

3) simulations (1000 simulations) to calculate 5% VAR. Then in order to
approximately estimate VAR for 1%, 0.5% and 0.1%
I scaled 5% VAR with factors corresponding to normal distribution (for
example: Norminv(0.001,0,1)/Norminv(0.05,0,1) for 0.1%).
The result of such extrapolation in this case is quite good (just 5%
different from the correct number).
We probably can use such rough estimates of tail for commodities portfolio
until we have proper methods implemented.

Tanya Tamarchenko
02/28/2001 01:17 PM
To: Wenyao Jia/HOU/ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: "analytical" var implementation in RisktRAC

Debbie,
I am forwarding to you a 2 page document describing implementation of
"analytical" VAR in RisktRAC.

Here is why this effort is very important:
1. We need to calculate VAR for other percentile but 5 (1% or even 0.2% as
mentioned by Rick Buy)
and our simulation model can not handle required number of simulations;
2. We need to present additional risk measures (such as Mean Tail Loss) to
the Board.

The analytical approach is implemented in a spreadsheet and fully tested
already so there will be no problems
with the algorithm itself.

We need to get together and discuss IT implementation.

What do you think?

Tanya


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042202.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:   1.94 / Final:   1.91)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I kept your contact list, but now I can't find the CV you sent.  Would you
mind resending?

Kevin Scott <kevinscott@onlinemailbox.net> on 06/20/2001 02:02:00 PM
Please respond to kevinscott@onlinemailbox.net

To: Steve Kean <skean@enron.com>, Jeff Skilling <jeff.skilling@enron.com>

cc:

Subject: Public Policy Contacts for California

Jeff and  Steve
?
As you requested, I have  prepared a list of my preferred public policy
contacts?for  California.? It is composed of professionals from an array of
public,  private and non-profit backgrounds.? I have worked in some capacity
with?each of these people?and most I know quite well.?
?
Please call me for further  background.
?
Kevin
213-926-2626
?
Attachment
 - Kevin Scott -  Preferred Contacts - 6-20-01.doc


I can try!

Lisa Mellencamp@ECT
07/11/2000 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Land Option Agreement with Electricities

can you do this?

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Jeffrey M Keenan
	07/11/2000 10:33 AM

		 To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Land Option Agreement with Electricities

Lisa:

Ken Raber (electricities) and I discussed the option agreement yesterday and
came to the conclusion that any issues electricities has with the option
agreement will go to you directly.  I believe that will streamline the
process.

The attorney's name is Mike Colo and his telephone number is 252-972-7105.

I would really like to get this option agreement signed as soon as we can and
I'm sure you feel the same!

If there is anything I can do let me know.

Jeffrey


sorry about that I woke up late


Gerald, I have discussed the papering of this transaction with SPPC and NPC
and we will proceed with the raising of a Master Firm agreement between ENA
and each of these co's.

This specific sale will be papered under Nevada Power Co. so let's proceed
with that paper being the lead.

I will review the confirm you sent, but re-issue under the premise that the
confirm is being raised to the new master.

Thanks.  BT


Tana/Kelly/Karen:

The product long descriptions below will fall under three new product types:
   US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt
   US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Call
 US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Put

Credit (Tom Moran) has approved copying the profiles for the new product type
from the following:

 US HeatingOil2 Fin Swap

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 25.

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Sever, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin
Options)

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moran, Tom
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Lees, Lisa
Cc: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: FW: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin
Options)

Lisa,

Please copy the existing counterparty profiles from: &US HeatingOil2 Fin
Swap8 and use it for these three new products:

US HtOil Fin Opt Nymex HO   AP
US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EP
US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EC

Regards,
tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walker, Chris
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Blumenthal, Jeff; Musch, Susan; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Moran, Tom; Swinney,
John; Taylor, Mark
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Sever, Stephanie; Jones, Tana; Lambert, Karen; Lombardi,
Kelly; Sweitzer, Tara; Kenne, Dawn C.; Moorer, Torrey; Meredith, Kevin;
Lozano, Melba; Hunter, Larry Joe; Cass, Robert B.
Subject: Product Type approval for 3 product types (Heating Oil Fin Options)

Your approval is needed for the following 3 product types in Datamanager:

US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt
US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Call
US HeatingOil2 Fin Opt Put

Please do not approve between the hours of 6 am and 11 am.

US HtOil Fin Opt Nymex HO   AP 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable.  Where this
Transaction is a Call Option, the Cash Settlement Amount shall be the greater
of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of (a) the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the Index minus the Strike Price.
Where this Transaction is a Put Option, the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of (a) the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the Strike Price minus the Index.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec 2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Contract during the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the simple arithmetic average of the daily
settlement prices of the prompt month NYMEX Heating Oil Futures Contract for
each Trading Day during such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be an Asian Put/Call. Automatic Exercise is
Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EP 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Strike Price minus the Index
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec  2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the settlement price for the NYMEX Heating Oil
Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on the expiration
day of the NYMEX Heating Oil Options Contract for such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be a European Put ("EP"). Automatic Exercise
is Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

US HeatOil2 Opt Nymex HO   EC 85.00           Dec01          c/GL-L

A financial Option Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which
the Seller receives the Premium and the Buyer receives the Cash Settlement
Amount. Each calendar month during the Term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period, provided that if the Term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the Term of the
Transaction. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be
calculated from the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website in
accordance with the unit of measure. The Premium shall equal the product of
(i) the price submitted by Counterparty via the Website, multiplied by (ii)
the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (iii) the
number of Determination Periods during the Term of the Transaction. The
Payment Date for the Premium shall be 2 business days after the Trade Date of
the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for the Cash Settlement Amount shall be
5 business days after the Cash Settlement Amount is determinable. The Cash
Settlement Amount shall be the greater of (i) zero, or (ii) the product of
(a) the Notional Quantity per Determination Period, multiplied by (b) the
Index minus the Strike Price.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Dec  2001
to the Termination Date of 31 Dec 2001.
The Exercise Period(s) shall be the last Trading Day of the NYMEX Heating Oil
Options Contract for the applicable Determination Period. The Index for a
Determination Period shall be the settlement price for the NYMEX Heating Oil
Futures Contract for the applicable Determination Period on the expiration
day of the NYMEX Heating Oil Options Contract for such Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the volume is shown shall be 42,000 gallons
per month.
The Option style and type shall be a European Call ("EC"). Automatic Exercise
is Applicable.
The Strike Price for the Transaction shall be as set forth on the Website.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


(See attached file: The Day Ahead US_may 14.pdf)

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com
 - The Day Ahead US_may 14.pdf


Take a look at the attached and let's talk tomorrow if at all possible.  I
want us to have a consensus among ourselves on this draft before I circulate
it more widely.


So does this included the guys?   There is just so much to do in LJ!  Dinner/
video?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Pullicino, Marcus
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 11:54 AM
To:	Hodges, Georgeanne
Subject:	FW: Project Plan Full Treasury Systems

Georganne

Attached below is the same documentation in Excel format

-----
From: 	Pullicino, Marcus
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 7:08 PM
To:	Hodges, Georgeanne
Cc:	Perkins, Mary; Round, Samuel; Moehlman, Cathy
Subject:	Project Plan Full Treasury Systems

Georgeanne,

Attached below is Treasury's initial project plan for a full banking system replica for Netco.  As you will see we have estimated we can be up and running with basic wire functionality by 1/23/01 and a full system of checks, issuance files, ACH's and Workstation within 93 days.  We do reserve the right to amend and or clarify this plan as we have time to complete our due diligence on the full system requirements and the impact of the changes.  Currently the plan does not include the Citibanking installation which will be included as soon as possible and will not extend the project deadline.

Regards,

Marcus Pullicino


Dear All

Please click into the weekly report template and add your information using
the current format:

Text =Times New Roman
 Font size = 12
All information should be bulleted using a simple circular bullet
point.

If you are submitting information for a consolidation of two or more groups,
please indicate under "Department" which groups are represented.

 Please complete the report for 3rd - 7th July 2000 and return the document
to me (Donna Titley) by 17:00 on Friday 7th July.

Regards
Donna


Dear PIRA Client:

The following Current News & Analysis articles have been published on
PIRA's website:

1) Will Russia Join In Non-OPEC Cooperation?
2) FSU Seaborne Exports
3) November Weather: Europe/Japan Cold, US Mild

Please go to http://www.pira.com

These articles can be found in the client section of PIRA's website. For
account information or to gain access please contact Dyana Rothman at
drothman@pira.com

Best regards,

PIRA Energy Group


Kate,
Aquila noted on our confirmation, that they DO NOT KNOW TRADE IN SYSTEM.
Lisa Robinson (back office at Aquila) said she asked her trader and he does
not know trade.  Please ask Jeff to contact trader.  Please keep me posted.
Thanks
Eol # 482869
Enron Buys Aquila
Oct 12-Oct 31 2000
$78.00
25 mws
Np15


I have an appointment today and will need to leave the office around 3pm..  I will be back in the office on Friday.
If you need anything before 3pm let me know, otherwise Debra will be here for any assistance you may need.

Thanks,
 Jill


Steve, Attached are briefs of the agreements wrt Dunwoody interest in some of
Teco's systems.  Please let me know if there is any section you need me to
expand on.


HAPPY BIRTHDAY GRACE!!!!

Wish Grace A Happy Birthday!!
She has Brownies to share.


I think we have a winner.

Main Entry: cir?cu?i?tous

      Pronunciation: (")s&r-'ky_-&-t&s
                     Function: adjective
                     Etymology: perhaps from Medieval Latin circuitosus, from
Latin
                     circuitus
                     Date: 1664
                     1 : having a circular or winding course <a circuitous
route>
                     2 : not being forthright or direct in language or action
                     - cir?cu?i?tous?ly adverb
                     - cir?cu?i?tous?ness noun

Also, you gotta love this quote:

Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions. No dignity, no
learning, no force of character, can make any stand against good wit.

       -Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882)

Truer words have never been spoken.

Shorty


From: Ken Lay- Chairman of the Board@ENRON
> I know it is discouraging to read the negative media coverage about our
> company.  On a positive note, there was an editorial in last Sunday's Houston
> Chronicle that I want you to read:
> <http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/editorial/outlook/1107504>.  This is an
> extremely difficult time for everyone and I appreciate everything you do for
> Enron.

Thank you for pointing out this inspiring article.

Sincerely yours,
--binkley

B. K. Oxley (binkley)
Manager Software Engineering
Enron Broadband Services
MS 4618
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002

mailto:Brian.Oxley@enron.com
(713) 408-7981 (Cell)
(713) 345-1747 (Office)
http://wwp.icq.com/2739017 (ICQ)


Please find out what you can about which issues FERC is interested in on the
Gallup rehearing requests.  I.e., did they issue the tolling order because of
our rehearing arguments on the confidentiality issue or SoCal's on the rate
discrimination issues?  Anything you learn would be helpful, but this info is
not so important that risks should be taken to get it.  Thanks.  DF.


Please find the attached file with three individual spreadsheets in response to the items required under the FERC monthly California Report.  I have made no changes to the preliminary file sent out for review on January 11th since I did not receive any comments.

If any corrections are necessary, please notify me and Jeanette Doll, who will be preparing the filing.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
x3-6928


Thanks for the reply.  I can understand your position.  I am looking more for
a refresher course.  I am planning on taking it around mid December or as
late as mid January.  I am beginning to start studying again on my own, but I
wanted to get a little more help.  Thanks for your call!
Ben


The GISB industry-wide meeting has been re-scheduled for Monday, February 14,
1:00 - 6:00 p.m. at the DOE.  The agenda and notice are attached.

Thanks,
Theresa


Here is the last draft confirms we had worked up which need to be completly
redone.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
01:27 PM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl@ECT
07/20/2000 04:55 PM
To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Southern Confirmation Letters

Attached please find a red-line redraft of the Confirmation Letters.  I
understand that Enron will not sign the confirmation letters with Southern
until Enron North America Corp. has finalized its arrangements with the Elba
Island Terminal entity having the gas available at the tailgate of the Elba
Island facility.  Is this correct.  If so, I do not need to make ENA's
contract with such entity a condition precedent to the Southern Confirmation
Letters.  Please advise.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Lynn-OUT OF OFFICE

Date:		3/10/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Farallon/Oaktree's counsel, Bruce MacLeod, began his questioning of Izower on
Friday 9/1.? MacLeod began by establishing that (1) in drafting the offering
White & Case attorneys relied upon information given to them by the
underwriters and (2) if the underwriters would have indicated to White & Case
that information in the offering memo was incorrect, White & Case would have
changed the offering memorandum.? MacLeod also established that Izower had
discussed the related party transactions with all of the initial purchasers
at one point or another.? MacLeod then attempted to revist the issue
concerning Chanmi's integrity and whether Chanmi's acceptance of kickbacks
was discussed with the underwriter group.? Izower's counsel refused to allow
MacLeod to revisit this testimony and McLeod ended his inquiry.

SDI's counsel, Mike Strub, was the only defense counsel to ask questions. (I
determined that the it made no sense to draw any attention to Enron/ECT given
that the testimony concerning Enron/ECT had been limited to general
statements concerning the "underwriters').? Strub attempted to establish that
SDI was not listed on White & Case's responsibility outline as one of the
drafters of the offering memo.? Izower agreed that SDI did not initially
draft the offering documents, but indicated that SDI commented on drafts.?
Izower also testified that he asked SDI's counsel Bob Walters to review the
related party transactions section of the memo and to comment on its
accuracy.? On rebuttal, MacLeod focused on SDI and established that SDI
reviewed and revised portions of the offering memo. and that Busse attended
the road shows and never advised Izower that the information contained in the
memo. concerning SDI's role was inaccurate.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


An incident with a love
  partner throws you for a
  loop, causing a bit of
  deja-vu. Dwelling on the
  past is wrong, wrong,
  wrong so don't! Time to
  concentrate on the bounty
  of the present, tender
  crab.


I think we need to update tariff sheets explaining the contract has terminated.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doll, Jeanette
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	TW rate sheets

Teb,

In talking with Michelle Brown about billing the Conoco contract, she was wondering if we needed to changed the tariff rate sheets for the Current Firm Customers.  I believe I copied you on the Conoco contract e:mail on the TCR II surcharges.  I was thinking (before talking with Michelle) that we really did not have to change those tariff sheets (5B.02 and 5B.03); however, I am not so sure anymore.  The CFC rates on 5B.02 do not apply to Conoco anymore.  So do we need to take them off?  There is a note on 5B.02 that says the surcharges on 5B.03 (TCR II) are applicable to the CFCs listed on 5B.02.

So my question:  Do we just leave the tariff sheets alone, since Conoco's contracts under the Global and Mini- Settlements have terminated, or do we need to update this sheets?

I do not think this is urgent, but I wanted to ask.

Jeanette


Kay--here is the clean one.  A word of warning--for some reason, if you use
"tools" "track changes" in word to mark your new changes, it will mark all
changes going back to the original Santee Cooper form we started with for
this.  That's why I used Comparerite.  If you don't have Comparerite (it's a
Lexis program, I think), email the new clean version to me and I can then run
the program and send it out for you.

I would still like to talk to you when you have a moment and find out how the
meeting went. Thanks.

 - CLEANVEP.DOC


David,  What should we do in this situation.  Shonnie 31463
----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:02 PM -----

	Jessica A Wentworth@ENRON
	08/28/2000 05:50 PM

		 To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brian Bierbach/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken Choyce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: vehicle rental in Gillette

Question for you guys - because of our past experience and situation I wanted
to have you guys let me know what to do on insurance.

The Gillette office is going to lease a 4 wheel drive vehicle for 1 month.
The lease is through Enterprise and they are asking if we want them to add
insurance.  Enron doesn't have a corporate rate for Enterprise.  I don't want
to assume anything so should we have them add it or not?

I am checking into trying to lease from Avis because we do have a rental
agreement with them.

Thanks

Jessica

Car Rental Contracts

Rental car contracts for January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000 have been
awarded to:

National Car Rental and Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.

When you rent a vehicle from National or Avis under the Contract, the daily
rental rate includes two kinds of insurance:
Avis, the coverage is $100,000 per person/$300,000 per occurrence, and
$50,000 for property damage.
These coverage's only apply when the vehicle is rented at the contract rate
using the following state contract identifier numbers:

National - 5000838
Avis - A288200


Bob,

In looking at the trends over the meters, I made a few adjustments (highlighted in blue).  Please use these changes and enter the deal changes in Sitara.  Let me know if you have any questions.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cotten, Robert
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:38 AM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Wellhead Adjustments - May, 2001
Importance:	High

Daren,

Please see the attached file.

Bob

 << File: Texas_Desk_Wellhead_Supply_May_2001_05_16.xls >>


Count me in.

	Legal Temp 1
	12/18/2000 03:03 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann
Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Reginald Shanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Chaundra
Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: East and Upstream Origination Christmas Lunch

The East and Upstream Origination Group Chrismas lunch will be Wednesday,
December the 20.  I am trying to get an approximate count of all employees
who will be attending.  I realize this is short notice, but in order to make
reservations, please RSVP to me today.  You can contact me via reply e-mail,
or at extension 5-3317. Later today, I will send an e-mail with the details
of the event.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.  Regards, Keegan
Farrell


Transwestern Transport Options:  A technical conference is being scheduled
for January 9, 2001.


I have looked through this for the East (outside of Northeast) and have
alerted our folks to retail filings and the commercial people to several IAs
and agreements that may be of interest.  I don't see anything else in which
we need to intervene.

P.S.  Dynegy (Coral, etc.) is filing a request for rehearing of the Southern
source and sink approval.  EPMI intervened, but did not take a position due
to our pending sale of Caledonia to Cinergy (which FERC approved on Friday).
We plan to look into filing a complaint against Southern for selling parking
type services.  I am working with Kevin and will keep you all informed if we
proceed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
10:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Janet Butler/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/14/2001 05:02 PM
To: Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James
Brown/ENRON@enronxgate, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Shelley
Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup
<Kerry.Stroup@enron.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron,
Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan
Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Edith Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Denis
Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Weekly Electric FERC Report

Attached is the Weekly Electric FERC Report for week ending March 9, 2001.

Please advise if you have trouble receiving this.


595511 - buy Idaho, May, Mid-C, 330

And on the Bloomberg confirms re: Mid-C - I'm pulling up the contract through
Livelink, because Sean wants to make sure the language does not allow for
curtailment at Mid-C if another unit in the path goes down. He says our Mid-C
is unrestricted anyway, so we shouldn't need another name in Enpower. Is this
the first time you've seen this delivery point name in a confirmation? Hold
off on this confirm for just a minute while I go over this with Sean.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/27/2001 01:45 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MISSING DEALS

Bloomberg
Mike Swerzbin

I am missing
Buy from Idaho May Mid-C  peak 25mw at $330.00

Also, Bloomberg sent over some confirmations for deal 595472 and 595473 and
the location is for unrestricted Mid-C.  Should we have this deal in enpower
as unrestricted Mid-C because if so it's not a selection currently.   Just
wondering!!


Please send an estimate of time and description of the topic to Rebecca.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 08:49 AM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	11/21/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Beena Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosane
Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mary_trosper@pgn.com, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie
Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES,
Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - December 12th


As presently drafted the ETA provides that if a master agreement is in force
covering a particular transaction, the master controls.  I don't think we
ever adequately resolved the multiple Enron entity issue, though.  For
example, if a counterparty has an ISDA Master Agreement in place with ENA,
that master agreement could easily cover a trade based on UK gas prices.
However, it is not the commercial people's intent that the system work that
way.  They want every trade for a particular product to be with a single
Enron entity (e.g. all UK gas transactions are with Enron Europe), regardless
of what master agreements are in place.  To resolve this I suggest that the
long descriptions be revised to state the Enron trading entity for each
product type (this is already in place for European derivatives) and that the
ETA be revised as follows:

revise the fifth line of paragraph (a) of Section 3 such that Transactions
are governed by the short and long definitions in respect of a product
"...and any master agreement between Counterparty and the Enron entity
trading in such product on the Website which is in effect as of the date of
the execution of such Transaction..."

(underlined text inserted)

I think this will please the commercial and tax people; any thoughts from the
legal side?


Here they are.  Thanks for your help today!  Kim.


Lou,

Thanks a lot.

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Congratulations on your promotion.  Lou


The above referenced meters need to be placed on a K.  Please note the
information below

98-6736  On 089 for 5/97 (activity @ this meter for 1/97 - 4/97 is on
078-29165-101) the referenced CPR Deal # is 1567 which ends 4/97.
98-9638  On 089 for 6/97 (activity @ this meter for 1/97 - 11/97 is also on
089) No referenced CPR Deal #.  The only month that has a K placed on it   is
12/97 and that is on the 078-30100-103 K.

Thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497


This is why the CPUC has opened its recent OII.  The problem now receives
national attention.

Nov 16,2000

California Power Plants Get Jolt
As Natural-Gas Supplies Are Cut

By Rebecca Smith
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

LOS ANGELES -- Southern California power plants, already stressed to their
limits last summer, got another jolt this week as a cold snap caused a sharp
curtailment of supplies of natural gas used to generate electricity.

The power plants were able to switch to burning oil and continue to produce
electricity. But the unusual curtailment of natural gas underlines concerns
that an increased reliance on gas for power generation across the U.S. is
putting the reliability of the nation's electricity supply at risk.

That's because virtually all power plants now under construction in the U.S.
burn gas and only gas. The units affected this week in San Diego were able to
shift to oil only because they were older plants that originally were
constructed to burn oil. Generators have been reluctant to add a dual-fuel
flexibility to plants in recent years because oil is far more polluting than
gas and generally has been costlier.

In California, where gas-supply problems first surfaced on Monday in San
Diego, there is pessimism about a Hydra-like energy crisis that seems to grow
new heads every day. The state weathered three-dozen electrical emergencies
last summer, caused by a shortage of electricity. Officials had hoped to
solve the problem by speeding up construction of new generating plants. Now,
they're finding the state may be building its way out of an electrical
problem and into a gas problem.

One official, who has been warning of the danger of reliance on a single
fuel, said this week's disruption pointed out the necessity of developing a
comprehensive energy policy that recognizes how changes in usage of oil, gas
and electricity affect each other. "We don't just need new generating plants
and transmission lines, we may need pipelines, too," said Terry Winter, chief
executive officer of the California Independent System Operator, the
organization responsible for maintaining adequate electricity supplies.  "You
can't look at these things in isolation."

The natural-gas problems surfaced when the local gas-distribution company,
San Diego Gas & Electric Co., notified power-plant operators and a handful of
industrial users that it would be restricting their gas use by about half. In
California, residential and small businesses have first crack at natural gas,
and industrial uses are regarded as secondary, even if they are generating
plants. Dynegy Inc., the Houston-based energy concern that owns some of the
older plants that serve San Diego, immediately switched to oil. But it didn't
like doing so; its plants create three times as much pollution when  they
burn oil and exhaust valuable air-pollution emission credits that power
plants here need to operate.

The San Diego units couldn't simply be shut down, because the state was short
of power. Roughly 30% of the state's capacity already was off-line, including
many of its nuclear units, as most of those plants are now undergoing repair
after being run at capacity limits throughout the summer.

What's more, the gas-pipeline system that feeds San Diego isn't big enough to
begin with. The system was built primarily to serve residential customers and
not big power plants.

The problems could persist, off and on, through the winter. That's because
gas-storage levels are down sharply from a year ago throughout the nation,
but especially in California, because it ran its gas-fired units so hard last
summer. This time last year, Southern California had 87 billion cubic feet of
gas in storage. Now, it's roughly 50 billion cubic feet, or 43% less. Prices
also have moved up sharply, from roughly $2.50 a million British thermal
units to around $8 this week. Nationally, storage levels are down about 8%
from a year ago.

"Gas is trading higher in California than anywhere else in the nation," said
John Lavorato, chief operating officer of Enron North America, a unit of
Enron Corp. of Houston. But he said they're headed up in the Northeast, based
on cold weather forecast for the next 10 days to two weeks.

High prices for fuel also push up prices for the end product, electricity. In
California the average price for electricity to be delivered Thursday was
$228 per megawatt hour. That's double the price a week ago and five times the
price a year earlier.


Here's the proposal to form the Team.

Note that the complete team list includes:

&The MRT will be led by Philippe Auclair, and will include Market Participant
Advisor (MPA),
Eric Woychik, Market Assessment Advisor (MAA), Steven Stoft, and any others
appointed by the
Board.

&The Market Design Group may be comprised of a number of national experts on
energy
market structure and regulation, and to be used as needed by the MRT. Severin
Borenstein,
Joe Bowering (PJM,s Market Monitor), William Hogan, Paul Joskow, and Frank
Wolak have all
expressed their willingness to assist the ISO Board through the Market Repair
Team.8

Does anybody have a read on Bowering from PJM?

Alan Comnes

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/13/2001 03:06 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: You Can Put A Stake in Their Hearts but They Never Die

Gang,

Just heard from someone at the ISO that the ISO Board is shoving a new market
approach down the staff's throat.

Rising from the almost dead ...

This "Market Repair Committee" is supported by Eric Woychik, advisor to Board
Member Florio.  The Committee members are Joskow, Hogan, PJM people, et
cetera, et cetera.  There will be something posted on the ISO's web site
shortly.  It will be approved at the Board meeting Thursday.

I'll be there.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


thanks, that looks great!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 4:56 PM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	RE: TW Credit Rating

i made some slight modifications.

 << File: TW Credit.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 4:43 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	TW Credit Rating
Importance:	High

 << File: TW Credit.doc >>
Kevin, please review the attached and add any details you feel are necessary.  I'd like to send this to Arizona Public Service on Tuesday 2/12.

thanks,
khyatt


Trish,

I could not access his neural network site.
It requires access password.

Vince

	From:  Patricia Tlapek                           06/12/2000 03:57 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Followup

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Tlapek/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000
03:57 PM ---------------------------

Barcharts@aol.com on 06/09/2000 10:01:59 AM
To: patricia.tlapek@enron.com, mike.roberts@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Followup

Good Morning,

I enjoyed visiting you yesterday afternoon to discuss the opportunity at
Enron.  Sounds exciting, challenging and a good use of a lot of my skills and
experience.  I look forward to further talks, hopefully this coming week.

I mentioned a couple web sites and don't know if they came through clearly on
the phone with my sore throat.

The neural network approach to timing can be found at
http://www.pfr.com/ptonline/

The introductory piece on technical analysis I wrote for Forbes.com and the
glossary can be found at htttp://www.forbes.com/tool/html/00/Jun/0603/feat.htm

I am also working with long time friend and neighbor Steve Nison with his
site and you can see the first on line lesson for free at
http://www.candlecharts.com/

Have a nice weekend.  Hope to hear from you next week.

Bruce M. Kamich, CMT
barcharts@aol.com
732-463-8438


I wanted to provide an update on our progress with AEC.  Bryce Baxter and his
team members have been in contact with Mike Bennett and Bill Hogue to
understand their needs.  We have provided the initial information they
requested (i.e., one month of data), and are awaiting their approval before
completing the analysis on the remaining months.  I am confident that we have
established clear points of contact within Settlements for Mike and Bill and
we will continue to work on solidifying the relationship.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Susan


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 10:49 AM -----

	Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate 06/11/2001 07:06 AM 	   To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: SoCal Edison - Margin Call - Proposed Trust Agreement

SoCal may have some issues providing margin in the form of L/Cs and cash due to bank and forbearance restricitions.  Attached is a proposal to provide collateral through a Trust Acct structure.  Please review.

Ed Sacks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Benny.Wu@sce.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Benny+2EWu+40sce+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 7:13 PM
To:	Sacks, Edward
Cc:	Jill.Horswell@sce.com
Subject:	SCE proposed Trust Agreement

Mr. Sacks

Here's the SCE proposed Trust Agreement for your review.  Please note that
it is in DRAFT form subject to changes.

(See attached file: Enron Trust.doc)

We will be contacting you on Monday for your response.

Thanks...

Benny Wu
Southern California Edison Company
Phone 626-302-3230
Fax 626-302-3254
 - Enron Trust.doc