fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 08:26
AM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
11/16/2000 08:27 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, jacquelinelindo@akllp.com,
paulpipitone@akllp.com
cc: Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ron Coker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew
Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: GE Breakout contract--Las Vegas Cogen

Thanks for the current draft contract.  I have gone through it and plugged in
the relevant information I have from the Summary Sheet that GE approved
earlier.

What I don't have, and am most interested in obtaining from whatever source
has them, are the following:

 1. Purchase price information (based on the current outstanding balance)
 2. Payment schedule (based on current outstanding balance) for Section 6.1.2.
 3. The massive volume of specifications and GE boilerplate that is to be
attached to the contract as Exhibits and Schedules.
 4. A form for Exhibit U, setting out the correct site-adjusted information
for these 4 turbines.
 5. Unit number identifications and guaranteed delivery dates for each of the
turbines.

We are prepared to fill in the unit-specific information beyond that which we
have already incorporated in the body of the document, and can fill in
specific numbers in Exhibit U, but need to have the remaining information.

Please note that there appears to be a couple of residual references in the
contract that may not or are not relevant to all contracts.

First, Section 10.10.6 (regarding maximum aggregate liquidated damages)
references 30% of the Purchase Amount.  It should be 30% of the Maximum
Liability Amount (according to the summary GE approved earlier).

Second, the contract provides for "Optional Electrical Output Guaranty" and
associated liquidated damages in 10.7.3.  This guaranty by its terms applies
only to installations utilizing 6 or more turbines.  I have deleted it from
the LV contract.

In addition, Bill Williams has told me that the site-adjusted performance
levels that GE provided for the summary information sheet are different (and
less favorable to the project ) than those GE provided him in other
documents.  We will need to confirm those numbers with GE.

Is there a contact point at GE whom we should talk with about getting the
information/Exhibits we need, or do we have the information already?

Please let me know.  We are in serious need of providing a document to our
prospective purchaser.


This is to confirm the monthly Industrials meeting for Thursday June 22, 2000
at 1:00 pm.

  Date:  June 22, 2000
    Thursday

  Time:  1:00 pm

  Location: EB 3316

  Topic:  Industrials

If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel to call me at 853-0643.

Thanks,

Kay


Do any of you use the messenging board system?  If so, please let me know how
you like it.  If you don't use it, and/or aren't interested in using it,
please let me know this as well.

Laura

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Harder/Corp/Enron on 12/08/2000
10:35 AM ---------------------------

Ina Rangel@ECT
12/08/2000 10:13 AM
To: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amanda
Huble/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enron Messenging Board

Please ask your traders if they have signed on to the messenging board system
and take a vote on how they like it.  I need to report to our setup team
whether to or not it will be a permanent system or if they should take it
away.

Thank You.
-Ina


You're invited to search and register:

Tuesday, March 6

Investinme.enron.com is a new tool to help you manage your professional
development.
It brings together the listings of internal programs, as well as access to a
database of
external programs, on-line courses and materials

Double Click  and select launch.

Web site demonstrations
EB 568 on March 5, from 1-5 PM (every hour), and March 6, from 9-5 (every
hour)

Questions?  Please call the EWS Development Center  X 3-0357.


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.


Start Date: 1/9/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010919.txt


******  ******      **       *************************************
**        **       *  *      ***   U.S. Department of Energy    **
****      **      ******     * Energy Information Administration *
**        **     **    **    ** To unsubscribe see the message ***
******  ******  **      **   ************* footnote **************
EIA, the Nation's clearinghouse for energy statistics. ***********
******************************************************************

(NOTE: To best view this document, your email software should
be set to view the item in an 80 character format, using a
"non-proportional" font, e.g. courier)
******************************************************************

This is to notify you of recent natural gas analysis released by the U.S.
Energy
Information Administration which can be found on our web site.

The Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting released an analysis report
entitled "U.S. Natural Gas Markets: Recent Trends and Prospects for the
Future".

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/naturalgas/pdf/oiaf00102.pdf
<http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/naturalgas/pdf/oiaf00102.pdf>

Please Note:  If the link does not work by clicking on the above URL, please
do
the following in order to view the products:

Go to EIA's home page at www.eia.doe.gov <http://www.eia.doe.gov>
On the left sidebar, click on "What's New"

--------------------------  To Unsubscribe  -----------------------------
You are currently subscribed to ng_analysis as: [Mike.Grigsby@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-ng_analysis-124863F@tonto.eia.doe.gov.
Please do not use the reply button.


what do you want for your 4th round pick?


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
06:00 PM ---------------------------

Zofia Grodek <zofiagrodek@usa.net> on 04/27/2001 05:32:41 PM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject:

Drogi Vincenty. Skoro Ty byles na tyle mily ze zadzoniles osmielam sie i ja
zaimejlowac do Ciebie . W dniach 29.04 do 7.05 bede w USA. Cel turystyczny do
moich znajomych z roku. W programie mam wiele. Glowna baza Idahi Springs. Lece
z mija corka i kolegami z roku. Nie znam Twojego miejsca zamieszkania, ale
moze . Tefon moich znajomych chyba 303 567 0190, adres e-mailowy
<Wgoleb@aol.com> Pzdrawiam Zofia Grodek. Oni maja na nazwisko Golebiowscy.

____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1


Attached is new and improved version of the FERC presentation.  Delete the
one I
sent you yesterday.  Detach and play "slide show" to see the short version
that
would be used for the presentation.  The additional pages would be distributed
in hard copy as a reference document.   The document includes a few minor
corrections and spellchecks, formats, etc.(See attached file: August 24
presentation to FERC1.ppt)

 - August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt


Bring AER


Harry,

Here is the model we talked about this moring.  The sample is for weekly option, but it can also apply on monthly.  Let me know if you have any question.

Thanks
Hai


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:   ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Gentlemen:

You will shortly receive two proposed documents:  a letter from MG Metals to
the Court, agreeing that quasi-in-rem jurisdiction exists for the time being,
to the extent (and only to the extent) of the funds currently in the escrow
account, and a proposed order for the Court to sign, which vacates the escrow
account and gives you the right to immediate possession of the funds in that
account.  Please let me have your authority by close of business tomorrow in
London to send these drafts to opposing counsel, in order to comply with the
Court's time-table.  I will be in the office the rest of the afternoon, but
will likely not be in tomorrow until around 10:00 a.m. Houston time, given a
doctor's appointment early in the a.m.

I and our outside counsel (including Mark Gately, who is no longer with Miles
& Stockbridge, but who participated in the telephone conference with the
Court yesterday), recommend that you authorize us to send these drafts to
opposing counsel immediately, as we were instructed to do by the Court.  If
we cannot reach an agreement on the language of these two documents with
opposing counsel, we will file them with the Court by the end of the week,
with the comment that we were unable to reach such an agreement.

In our view, the Court is doing all this in order to force Base Metals to put
up or shut up.  At the telephone conference yesterday, the Court made clear
it thought MG Metals was solvent and thought little of the objections Base
Metals had raised to our previously-filed proof of such solvency.  However,
before ordering the escrow account dissolved, the Court wanted to give Base
Metals some time (and we anticipate that it will be not more than about 10-20
days) to file a suit directly against MG Metals in this Court if MG Metals
thought it had the facts to do so; hence, the request by the Court for a
letter from us regarding MG Metals' amenability to quasi-in-rem jurisdiction,
at least until the escrow account is dissolved.  In so many words, the Court
made clear to us that we better be sending such a letter if we wanted the
Court's cooperation in getting the escrow account dissolved quickly.

The proposed letter to the Court does not, in our view, agree to anything
that is not already true as a matter of law.  It stops short of saying that
there is no quasi-in-rem jurisdiction after the escrow account is vacated;
however, either there is or is not, depending on the law, so again, we are
not giving up anything.  My sense is that if Base Metals for some reason
waits until after the escrow agreement is vacated to file suit directly
against MG Metals in this Court, the Court will not be pleased.  I also think
that this Court already thinks more of us than Base Metals, and I would not
be unhappy to have to litigate in this Court.

I await your response.

Britt


Hi There,

November is here and it is time to give thanks. As the year
is drawing to a close there is much to be thankful for.
Thank you for your business and your continued support of my
business with referrals and support.

Once again, I am having a drawing for a free turkey for your
Thanksgiving dinner. Write, phone, or e-mail me with your
entry by November 18th, 2000. Your chances of winning are
excellent.

My new newsletter is now available from the hyperlinks
below. Please check it out and I can answer any questions
you might have.

This month's issue includes topics such as:

.To stretch or not to stretch, that is the question
.Pre-approval versus pre-qualification,Is there a
difference.
.Should I take my home off the market during the holidays
.Is your neighborhood kid-friendly
.Steel forges new role in home building

Here is a link to my "November Real Estate Update"

http://homeownernews.com/24/IonaAlphonso

AOL Users:
 Click
Here

I hope you enjoy the newsletter. I would welcome your
comments.

Sincerely,

IONA ALPHONSO

ALWAYS IN TUNE WITH YOUR NEEDS

Oh, by the way ...If you know of someone thinking about
buying or selling a home, please call me with their name and
number - Thanks a Million!!

Prudential, Gary Greene Realtors
3910 FM 1960 West, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77068

Voice Mail: 281-857-2485 x 535
Pager:      281-551-6549
Office:     281-444-5140
Fax:        281-444-0630
Web Site:   http://www.ionaalphonso.com
Resume:     http://www.har.com/ionaalphonso
Gary Greene Web site: http://www.garygreene.com

PLEASE VIEW MY MONTHLY NEWSLETTER AT
http://homeownernews.com/c/ionaalphonso


Interested in learning more about
the fun and convenience of
on-line stock trading?

Join EFCU for our
On-Line Stock Trading Brown Bag.

WHO:  Joel Spry of Star Financial Network
will discuss the basics of on-line trading
and EFCU's trading program.

WHEN:  Friday, September 14, 2001
11:30 - 12:30

WHERE:  EB 5C2

RSVP:  joy.wagman@enron.com

Refreshments will be provided.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


It looks like Enron Japan was kept in the loop.  Let's keep it up.  Good luck
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 02/20/2000 05:23
PM ---------------------------

Loretta Brelsford@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/18/2000 04:59 PM
To: Steven J Kean@EES
cc:
Subject: 5 visitors from Enron Broadband Services (EBS), formerly Enron
Communications Inc

Steve - regarding the voice mail you left for Rebecca about the EBS visitors,
you can see from the note below that Wrobel and Hirl were notified and in
fact they are working out of the E-Power office.  Thanks for ensuring Rebecca
is kept in the loop.  Loretta
---------------------- Forwarded by Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/18/2000 04:59 PM ---------------------------
From: Michael Grimes on 02/18/2000 09:34 AM
To: Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: 5 visitors from Enron Broadband Services (EBS), formerly Enron
Communications Inc

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Grimes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/18/2000 09:37 AM ---------------------------

"Tomoko Shigeta" <shigeta@21stenergy.com> on 02/18/2000 04:08:31 AM
To: "Wrobel Bruce" <wrobel@21stenergy.com>, "Awano Hiroo"
<awano@21stenergy.com>, "Tatsuro Seguchi" <seguchi@21stenergy.com>, "Sloan
Carey" <sloan@21stenergy.com>, Joseph P
Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nicholas
O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: "Maehara Yuuki" <maehara@21stenergy.com>, "Ikemi Yuko"
<Ikemi@21stenergy.com>, "Sumie Uchiyama" <uchiyama@21stenergy.com>, "Takebe
Saeko" <takebe@21stenergy.com>, "Inoue Noriko" <inoue@21stenergy.com>,
"Miyamoto Kyoko" <miyamoto@21stenergy.com>, "Yoshisako Yuji"
<yoshisako@21stenergy.com>, "Uchida Yoshiyasu" <uchida@21stenergy.com>,
"Shirota Toru" <shirota@21stenergy.com>, "Nakamura Tetsuro"
<nakamura@21stenergy.com>, "Kaneda Takehisa" <kaneda@21stenergy.com>,
"Fujinaga Takashi" <fujinaga@21stenergy.com>, "Suzuki Makoto"
<suzuki@21stenergy.com>, "Kobayashi Koji" <kobayashi@21stenergy.com>,
"Kuwabara Jun" <kuwabara@21stenergy.com>, "Sampei Hidenori"
<Sampei@21stenergy.com>, "Arai Daisuke" <arai@21stenergy.com>, Rousseau
Anai/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Seth
Hurwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Grimes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, "Sueyoshi Hiroaki"
<Sueyoshi@21stenergy.com>, "Row James.C." <James.C.Row@enron.com>, Sarah
Goodpastor@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS

Subject: 5 visitors from Enron Broadband Services (EBS), formerly Enron
Communications Inc

To all

We have 5 visitors from EBS next week.
Please find their schedules as follows:

Jim Row: IN 20th (Sun)  - OUT 29th (Tue)

Sarah Goodpaster: IN 20th (Sun) -  OUT 29th (Tue)

Colin Jackson: IN 20th (Sun) - OUT 26th (Sat)

Donald Lassere: IN 20th (Sun) - OUT 26th (Sat)

George Babaz: IN 23rd (Wed) - OUT 26th (Sat)

They  are going to stay Park Hyatt Tokyo.

And also please find the contact details for them in Tokyo as follows:

Epower Corporation
Address: Shinjuku Center Building 50th Floor, 1-25-1, Nishi-Shinjuku,
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-0650 Japan

Office switchboard: (03) 5324-9360 (From overseas: 81-3-5324-9360)
Office fax: (03) 5324-9384 (From overseas: 81-3-5324-9384)
Jim direct in: (03) 5324-9392 (From overseas: 81-3-5324-9392)
Jim cell phone: 090-7188-3706(From overseas 81-90-7188-3706)
Sarah direct in: (03) 5324-9505 (From overseas: 81-3-5324-9505)
Sarah cell phone: 090-7188-2367(From overseas 81-90-7188-2367)
Direct in for Colin, Donald and George: (03) 5324-9389 (From overseas:
81-3-5324-9389)

Park Hyatt Tokyo
Address: 3-7-1-2, Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-1055 Japan

Switchboard: (03) 5322-1234 (From overseas: 81-3-5322-1234)
Fax: (03) 5322-1288 (From overseas: 81-3-5322-1288)

Minasan dozo yoroshiku onegai shimasu.

Regards,
Tomoko Shigeta

 - att1.htm


SDG&E made a filing Wednesday to add a $0.023/kWh bill surcharge.  If
possible could you send Ed and me a copy of the filing?

Thanks,

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: soblander@carrfut.com [mailto:soblander@carrfut.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:48 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
Subject: ALL daily charts and matrices as hot links 10/25

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude21.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas21.pdf

No distillate or unleaded charts today.

Dec WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clz-qoz.pdf
Dec Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Dec Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Nov Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-hox.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Nov/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hux-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG21.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG21.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL21.pdf

Scott Oblander
312-762-1015
312-762-1014 fax
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606


---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
08/25/2000 02:53 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Berger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alonzo Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley
Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Brian
Robinhold/PDX/ECT@ECT, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amy Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa R Kotrla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Ameren Services Company

Please note the following changes:
Ameren Services Company (ASC)
Assigned its sales agreement to:
Ameren Energy, Inc. as agent (ASC)
(for and on behalf of Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren UE, Ameren Energy
Marketing Company, and Ameren Energy Generating Company)
Transmission remains with Ameren Services Company


Please mark your calendar:

Date: Tuesday, Dec 12
Time: 4:00 - 5:00 PM
Locations: EB 21C2
Subject: Cost Savings for Confirm Central
Attendees: Sally Beck
 Tom Gros
 Mary Solmonson
 James Scribner
 Bob Hall
 Leslie Reeves
 Brad Romine
 Patrick Scales
 Kim Theriot

Thanks,
Patti x39106


I have responded back to Barbara and am sending her some written material.

Thank you.

Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 10:50 AM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Report Research

Joe, Mike,

Please check with PR first if we want too talk to her
and run  it by Mark. I think it is in our interest to be
quotes extensively in the press.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

EnergyWriter@aol.com on 10/11/2000 10:54:39 AM
Please respond to EnergyWriter@aol.com
To: energywriter@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Report Research

I am writing a management report on weather risk management. The story
will discuss different weather risk management tools used by power
marketers in the energy industry. It also looks at weather prediction
and analysis services available to energy traders.

I am looking for a list and description of the weather risk management
products, and how each can benefit an energy trader. I would also like
to know what  traders' reactions to significant weather are. And where
can I find a list of popular weather instruments with descriptions?

I appreciate any help you can give me. I would like to set up a chat
with you this week if you have the time, or simply email me your input.
Thanks in advance!

Barbara Drazga
Independent Journalist
PO Box 472401
Aurora, CO 80047
303-369-3533 tel.
303-369-3510 fax


Mike Day believes that SCE might agree to a new Stipulation in which they commit to pay our claim if their new deal and their pending Advice Letter are approved by the CPUC.  I have scheduled a call for tomorrow at 12:30 CST to discuss the terms we would like to see in the Stipulation (e.g., drop approval of the Advice Letter as a condition, payment within 10 days after CPUC approval, agreement on the number set forth in our response to their Data Request, agreement to apply accrued negative CTC credits to current T&D charges, to name a few).   On the other hand a delay in this proceeding is probably in our interest, in view of the SCE Counterclaim.  Going this route would probably be in lieu of some of the other alternatives we discussed, so I believe we will need to get senior management't approval to any agreement.


I'm send you my info just so you have it. I'm  not expecting a return
response:

Cindy Franklin
El Paso Transportation Services
832.676.3177

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Attached please find the cover letter and request for information of Public
Service Company of New Mexico, per the Technical Conference on Tuesday,
August 28, 2001, in Docket No. RP00-336.

 - Cover Letter.doc
 - Request for Information.doc


Here some other ideas:

TransCap, Inc.

TransGas, Inc.

or maybe(!), FullPipe'R'Us Corp.

Susan Scott
12/08/2000 02:28 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: NewCo names

OK, here's my 2 cents' worth:

Avale Corp.
I also like Enable.
I think either one would look fine on an EBB list of customers...

Also -- any name we choose could include the words Capacity Management.  But
I'm not sure we want to or need to be that descriptive.

Jeffery Fawcett
12/08/2000 02:04 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: NewCo names

Here's my best shot(s):

NatCom Energy Services, Inc.

Streamline Energy Services, Inc.

Handyman Energy Services, Inc.

Enable Energy Services, Inc.  (var. Enerable)


Email from Kimberly Browm


Your account has been credited for $4495.35
The account is up to date. Things are promising again :)
Yours, ameer
>>> <John.Griffith@enron.com> 03/22/01 02:11PM >>>

thank you I will be watching for this.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 12:53
PM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 04/23/2001 10:15:27 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks51.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Monday, November 6, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182767
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Credit Suisse First Boston
 CSFB and DLJ are now one. #1 in M&A deals. #1 in IPO volume.
 #1 in high-yield debt underwriting. The best part? That,s
 just the beginning.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=182768

"There is the greatest practical benefit in making a few
failures early in life." -- Thomas H. Huxley, biologist

CONTINENTAL, NORTHWEST DEAL DURING TRIAL
With their federal court trial at hand, the two major air
carriers do a deal.

By Tom Jacobs

Feeling the heat of the Department of Justice's (DOJ) antitrust
trial against them, defendants Northwest Airlines (Nasdaq: NWAC)
and Continental Airlines (NYSE: CAL) announced today an
agreement intended to end the dispute. The DOJ sued the airlines
in 1998 over a deal giving Northwest 54% voting control over
Continental -- preventing Continental's takeover by Delta Air
Lines (NYSE: DAL). Under the deal, Continental would buy back
Northwest's common stock. The parties will ask the federal judge
to delay the trial, which started last week, while the carriers
work out the details.

A CAREFUL DEAL
The deal has two goals: to address the DOJ's belief that the
Northwest-Continental combination would lead to higher prices
for consumers, and to retain the benefits of the two air powers'
alliance.

The pact extends the alliance through 2025 and changes the
Northwest-Continental relationship. According to the deal,
Northwest will pay $450 million for 6.69 million Continental
Class A shares, and hold on to 2.6 million Class B shares.
Continental will recapitalize, reclassifying each Class A share
into 1.32 shares of Class B common stock. Continental will issue
Northwest a special series of preferred stock, which will give
Northwest blocking rights over certain Continental business
combinations and change of control between Continental and a
third party. Continental can redeem its preferred stock under
certain conditions, such as a change of control at Northwest.

A DELICATE BALANCE
The industry and the government are groping in the
post-deregulation era to weigh the needs of consumers against
cutthroat worldwide airline competition. For example, the DOJ is
separately reviewing United Airlines' (NYSE: UAL) $4.3 billion
purchase of US Airways Group (NYSE: U). All the airlines have
formed alliances similar to Northwest's and Continental's,
involving the now-common practice of code-sharing, which means
putting customers who buy tickets with one airline on the other
airline's flights, and offering reciprocal frequent-flyer
programs and airport lounge rights.

The trial began last week after a week's delay, during which
settlement talks continued. But the trial pressure ultimately
caused a change at Northwest, which rejected earlier this year
Continental's buyback offer. At that time the two agreed to
reduce Northwest's power over Continental's daily operations --
but it apparently didn't satisfy the DOJ.

Pending the judge's decision on the seven-day delay, Continental
and Northwest plan to execute the agreement in one week. They
expect it will take two months to close the deal, which would be
subject to settlement of the litigation with the DOJ.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

The Wall Street Journal reported that tobacco companies
Lorillard Tobacco, owned by Loews Corp. (NYSE: LTR), and Liggett
Group, owned by Miami's Vector Group (NYSE: VGR), will announce
a $8 billion settlement in federal court tobacco litigation in
Brooklyn. The move is said to include a 30-year payment
schedule, with Lorillard paying the bulk -- $7.5 billion. The
Journal reports that the parties hope to insulate themselves
from liability from the Florida state court $144.87 billion
judgment. The two tobacco companies split from their colleagues
after the Florida verdict and have been negotiating with other
plaintiffs' groups seeking a class action before U.S. Judge Jack
Weinstein of Brooklyn, famed for his handling of mass tort
litigation cases such as the Agent Orange and asbestos
class-action lawsuits.

Santa Clara, Calif. computer chip maker Transmeta reportedly
plans to hold its initial public offering this week. Transmeta
makes microprocessors said to use less power and extend battery
life in PC notebooks and Internet appliances. Expected investor
demand led Transmeta last Friday to raise its projected IPO
share price range to $16-$18 from $11-$13. Apparently, interest
remains high despite last week's big news that IBM (NYSE: IBM)
canceled plans to use a Transmeta chip in a new laptop computer.

Computer networking product maker 3Com (Nasdaq: COMS) agreed to
settle shareholder lawsuits related to its 1997 $8.5 billion
merger with U.S. Robotics. The settlement will be for $259
million. Shareholders alleged that 3Com inflated its stock price
by giving rosy financial projections and delaying -- or hiding
-- the news of a huge backlog of unsold U.S. Robotics modems,
while executives of both companies sold 4 million shares with
3Com stock at its peak. Those who bought 3Com stock between
April 23 and November 5, 1997, are eligible to share in the settlement.

After last week's decision by media giant Bertelsmann AG to ally
with Napster and finance its move to a royalty-paying music
service, two top executives of Bertelsmann's BMG Entertainment
unit quit. Chairman Michael Dornemann and President Strauss
Zelnick said they would depart, reportedly unhappy with new
directions at Bertelsmann and BMG's reduced role in television
and the Internet. Under Zelnick, BMG's album market share
increased 50%, from 13% to 20%, and the company grew to own more
than 200 record labels in 54 countries. Zelnick exits with a
sweet severance package estimated at between $20 million and $50
million.

Check out Friday's market wrap-up with one swift click!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182769
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

'Tis the season to begin considering some year-end tax planning
tips.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182770
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182771

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182772

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182773

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182774

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182775
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182776
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182777
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182778
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182779
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182780

 Sponsored By: Credit Suisse First Boston
 CSFB and DLJ are now one. #1 in M&A deals. #1 in IPO volume.
 #1 in high-yield debt underwriting. The best part? That,s
 just the beginning.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=182781

FREE FOR FOOLS!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=182782

TRY THE ALL-CASH DIET
 Get your spending under control with
 this report from Soapbox.com.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=182783

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=182784
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-13531-2000-11-06_9-24-52-3389247_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:26:05(11-06
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Nope.  Gosh, the suspense nearly killed me!!!

	Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 02:16 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: O'Ryan Power Holding

Good Afternoon Tana,

 Is O'Ryan Power Holding (formerly Duquesne Light Company) in the process of
setting up an ISDA ?

Thanks for you assistance.

T. Mandola


I don't think we need the language, especially since the guarantees won't
apply to retrofitting the plant later.

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 02/07/2001 09:08:48 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

I would recommend that we not insert Eric's comments regarding the
exhaust temperature and energy guarantees for combined cycle facilities.
As Eric indicates, this is a simple cycle plant, which is similar to
Fountain Valley.  When commenting on the Fountain Valley agreement, Lee
recommended that all references to exhaust temperature and energy
guarantees be stricken and we did so.  In addition, Lee has already seen
a version of the City of Austin agreement that had Sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 (the sections Eric would like to reinstated) stricken. Let me
know what you think, but I recommend we leave them out, particularly if
such sections are not necessary and would only be useful to have in the
future if the plant ever went combined cycle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

Here's what Eric wrote:

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those
changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were
related
to exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant
and
they typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would
guarantee
it anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes
combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that
out, then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and
10.4.4
(and their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached
to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in
my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something
from GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.


Shrley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/23/2001 02:02 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

I have already requested Friday, April 6th as a vacation day, and if it is ok,
I would also like to take Friday the 30th as a vacation day.

Thanks!

Shirley


Hey Errol,

I was just wondering if you could please get back to me about those two deals
that I've been trying to get some information on from you.  May Nymex is
being
invoiced today, April liquidations are being run either on Monday or Tuesday
next week, and I need to know how I'm supposed to invoice for QX0898 and
QX0899.

It is very important that this gets figured out as soon as possible as the
customer
is wanting to settle these deals, and we have nothing to show for it right
now.

Please let me know what you come up with.

Thanks
Stacey


I invite you to provide feedback on the Analyst & Associate Program, using a very short, anonymous and confidential survey. In the very near future, you will receive an email from ramabile@execlead.com asking for feedback on your overall satisfaction with the Program, and your suggestion of one thing we should focus on for improvement. To insure confidentiality of your responses, Executive Leadership has been engaged to conduct and compile the results of the survey.
The survey is designed to be completed in about two minutes, and your participation is important. We plan to do short surveys like this a couple of times each year, in addition to the all employee survey. As always, I invite each of you to contact me or anyone on my team if you'd like to discuss ideas or issues in person.
Thank you in advance for your participation,
Billy Lemmons


I just would not want to be the only person to bring someone.  So if we don't
offer this to everyone, I won't bring her.  I don't have a problem with it,
just wanted to see what you thought.

DG

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           12/13/2000 04:56 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner

What would you think about just Kristi coming?  I'm sure no one would have
any problems with that.  Especially since they got to bring someone to the
party last weekend.  Jeff is going too, I asked him about the budget and he
is totally fine with that.  Have people been asking if they can bring someone?


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed060601.pdf
 - ed060601.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001
02:34 PM ---------------------------

Mark.Ebert@broadwing.com on 05/08/2001 10:47:59 AM
To: BryLad5@aol.com, dgiron@ect.enron.com, david.long@tdhca.state.tx.us,
keykeith@mindspring.com, george.ewton@unisys.com,
heather.hodnett@tdhca.state.tx.us, bjnelson81@uswest.net,
jw@cleartrading.com, kelang@mmm.com, keith.doran@tdhca.state.tx.us,
SPSMITHCPA@aol.com, swash@tdhca.state.tx.us
cc:
Subject: FW: Final Answer

 - Final Answer.jpg


Jon, Please provide a live price on this new consumption pattern.  thanx gmann

Deal Start Date:	 01-Oct-01
Deal End Date:	 30-Sep-01
Term Duration (months):	 60

Fuel Rate %:	 1.5610%

 	 Month	 Rate 11 Volume

 	 January	 1,200
 	 February	 875
 	 March	 840
 	 April	 550
 	 May	 300
 	 June	 220
 	 July	 140
 	 August	 150
 	 September	 280
Start Month	 October	 525
 	 November	 800
 	 December	 1,000
Greg Mann
Sales Manager
(403) 663-2817
fax: (403) 663-2899
greg.mann@enron.com <mailto:greg.mann@enron.com>


I don't think I gave you George Briden's number in my voice mail today.  Its
401-934-1433.  Just out of curiosity, please let me know if they are as eager
to move forward as George said they were.  Thanks. DF


Is this the deal you referenced at the exec comm (B) meeting ? Or is there another one. I asked my guys to check if we had seen deal. Rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Ken
Sent:	Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Buy, Rick
Subject:	Stadacona Transaction

The paper transaction you asked about in the staff meeting is with E.W. Scripps Company, S&P rated A/stable.  The deal has not been signed and the contract is still being negotiated.  We gave the marketers a preliminary approval based on the existing credit threshold of $10 million.  We have not valued the exposure or credit reserve since we do not have final transaction details.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
      Ken


Please coordinate the payment of the City of Vernon bill from my RC.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 12:21 PM -----

	Sheila Tweed
	11/29/2000 02:41 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Outstanding Invoices---FYI regarding MDBE bills for your groups.

----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 02:37 PM -----

	"Wendell, Harlan" <HWendell@mdbe.com>
	11/29/2000 12:40 PM

		 To: "Sheila R. Tweed (E-mail)" <Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "+Karen Jones
(E-mail)" <Karen.E.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc: "Ogilby, Barry" <bogilby@mdbe.com>
		 Subject: Outstanding Invoices

Sheila and Karen,

As you requested, our accounting department has not been following up on our
outstanding invoices -- which at this point total about $700,000 (see
attached).  Sheila, I gather you told Barry you would try to get us current
before the end of November.  That would be great if you can do it.  (I can
give you wire info if you need it.)  If we don't make November (I know
you're swamped!), December would be OK, but it is very important to us that
we get caught up by year end.  Let me or Barry know if there's anything we
need to do.

Harlan

 <<ena outstandings.PDF>>

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

 - ena outstandings.PDF


This is a reminder of Enron's Email retention policy.  The Email retention policy provides as follows:

Message Location - Maximum Retention
Inbox - 30 days
Sent Mail Folder - 30 days
Trash/Deleted Items - Rollover from Inbox for one day
Folders - All Email messages placed in folders will be destroyed after one calendar year. This includes public folders in Outlook.

Furthermore, it is against policy to store Email outside of your Outlook Mailbox and/or your Public Folders.  Please do not copy Email onto floppy disks, zip disks, CDs or the network.  Such actions are prohibited and will not be supported by the IT Department.

There will be no exceptions to this policy.


I offered you my 1 and 3 for your 1 and 4.  I can throw in my 5 for your 6.

Let me know.

Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Smith L Day/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 01:59
PM ---------------------------

Mike Curry
12/13/2000 10:11 AM
To: Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting on Tuesday, December 12 regarding QSE Status has CHANGED

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 12:10 PM
---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Stephanie Gardner                           12/11/2000 04:54 PM

To: Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Ahn/NA/Enron@Enron, Bruce Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michelle Parks/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Meeting on Tuesday, December 12 regarding QSE Status has CHANGED

The QSE Status meeting has changed to Wednesday, December 13 at 3:30pm in EB
2988.  If you are unable to attend in person the call in number is
1-800-713-8600; Pass Code 9940.

AGENDA: To discuss key regulatory and business points under discussion or
needing to be discussed in ERCOT. This will be a bi-weekly call. For
Wednesday, issues list is Sub-QSE's, credit issues related to QSE's, and mock
market issues. Please fell free to add other items to this list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.

Thanks,

Stephanie Gardner
713-853-9434


Sue: Thanks to you too. It was a pleasure having you as a key player on our
convention team and as a fellow host/hostess at Enron events. We did much
more at these conventions and the demands were greater because of Enron's
growing business as well as political interests. Heidi and Carolyn Cooney
were outstanding. Their experience in organizing our participation and
satisfying each Enron participant in getting access to events is just short
of miraculous or maybe just exceeding it.  I was especially pleased that Rick
participated so actively as well as our other collegues especially the folks
from Omaha who made the Nebraska events such a success. I know that Heidi
will appreciate your thanks. To repeat: she and Carolyn deserve some special
recognition for a superb job, Joe

Susan M Landwehr@EES
08/21/2000 09:22 PM
To: heidikp@lonestarstrategies.com
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: thanks

Heidi--thanks for all of your good work in organizing our participation at
both the Republican and Democrat conventions.  While I know that you've
worked with Enron on many events in the past, I recognize the difficulties in
dealing with some new "cooks in the kitchen" this time around.  Your
professionalism and courtesies to the first timers in this process, including
me, is much appreciated.


OK...begging bowl in hand....

Do you have anyone I could borrow for a couple of months?

Either Sen Spec or Spec - to work with Kristin Albrecht on some general
ledger clear-up and go-forward work.

I really need someone - I've hired but these new people will take a while to
show up.

Thanks.

B.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000
03:43 PM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/22/2000 01:31:00 PM
To: "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Softball info

Include all the names in the CC box in email so they can be added to the
master list for updates.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:28 PM
To: MMMarcantel@equiva.com
Subject: Re: Softball info

lisa gillette
kendra something
bryan hull


Yes - I just changed the deal to reflect 0.01 broker fee.

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/25/2001 11:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs

501436

should there be a fee on this deal.

thanks


We have lunch scheduled for June 22, according to my calendar.  I am looking
forward to it.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin                           06/05/2000 03:50 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Yesterday's meeting

Thanks for the note.   I'd love to do lunch when you have the time.  It will
help me in serving Energy Ops.
hgm

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           06/05/2000 09:56 AM

To: Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Yesterday's meeting

That meeting was about my 13th of the day that began at 7:30, and that was
day three of the week with that kind of scheduling.  I apologize if I seemed
impatient in the meeting.  I know that you are working for the best interests
of Energy Operations and  Enron.  By the end of the day I was probably
looking for crisp, clear solutions to an issue that probably doesn't lend
itself well to that.

Why don't we set up a lunch so that you and I can have the opportunity to
talk separate from immediate issues at hand?  I will have Patti get a date on
the calendar.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin                           06/02/2000 03:21 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Yesterday's meeting

Dear Sally,
I should have and I could have made a better job of trying to sell my idea at
yesterday's meeting.   I'll be the first one to admit that all of my
suggestions are not always the best alternative but,   I hope that you
believe that I do have your best interests and Enron's best interests in mind
every time that I make a suggestion.
I hope to earn your trust as we continue to work together.
Sincerely, hgm


Amanda,

Please add add a link called "Plant Outages (portland)", to the Gas
Fundamentals website under the Power tab.  The description is as follows:

"Query of Portland's database of plant outages for yesterday and today."

Thanks.

Mat


well....

i'm finally a casualty of this crazee economy...
redsky filed chapter 11,
and i find my fine self without a job!

so please use the following email address until further notice (i will find
another job, right?)

colleenfsilva@yahoo.com

thanks and talk to you all sooooon!

-------------------------------------------------------------++

colleen silva
producer
RED SKY       >san francisco
v 415-633-2023
c 415-336-2219
<http://www.redsky.com>


Hi You'all - just a note to say hello before I dash off to run errands and
also wanted to ask you a favor.  On July 14th you sent us an accounting of
your events with the flooding and I saved it in our email messages.
Actually printed it out but the first word of each line did not print and
now I only have pgs. 2 and 3.  We subsequently have had to change our email
address and was wondering if you perchance saved this one and could re-send
it to us at this address as we want to save it in Word and print it and put
it in the family album - That was hopefully a once in a lifetime event and
whomever, Anne or Marie wrote it you did an awesome job with your
descriptions.  Let us know if you can't find it as John said they did back
stuff up (as we also recently changed to an updated computer program) and he
said that he might be able to resurrect it for us but to ask you first.
Have you gotten everything all back to normal?  How are the kitty cats
doing?  We are looking forward to Mama Rita's visit and Stephen and I want
to take her to "Late Night Catechism" - in fact we are getting the tix
tomorrow - there are all kinds of things we want to do when she is here but
not enough time.  It will be fun to have her go to Min and Mike's for
Thanksgiving and she will be here for Isabel's "1st" B'Day.  By the way
speaking of birthdays, hope you had a nice one, Marie (you're still way
younger than all of us!!!) Hope work is going okay (are you in another dept?
  - thought Rita told us you had changed something job-wise) Anne, am sure
you are busy as ever.  We had a fun time at Michele's (she did get her
layoff notice from BAC) and will be through I think it is Dec. 14th) for
Marianne's 40th B'Day. It was a '70's theme with music from ABBA, Tacos,
chocolate cake and all the family - it was nice to see that Michele's place
worked for a large family gathering as we hope to down-size in a couple
years. Stephen along with John and Stevie's help have been making a lot of
progress downstairs.  Stevie and Jennifer will be moving to a new home (it
is a lot like yours and Michele's in northeast Tacoma) it will be ready
after the first of the year - will be in neighborhood with sidewalks which
will be nice with Isabel as the home they are in now, though the yard is
fenced is on a busy street.  They have sold it fortunately at a profit and
it definitely paid off to have their downstairs finished.  We were happy to
hear about Sydney Nicole joining the family and it is nice for Cameron to
have a little sister.  Am sure you'all as well as we are still feeling
uneasy about everything since Sept.  It is unsettling not knowing if another
event will surface.  A few weeks ago they had extra security around the
bridges here and in CA  but am sure whatever happens if it does will happen
without any notice. Steffi is still working as a temp employee with Maxim
Systems, she hopes to get hired as a permanent employee within the next
couple weeks.  She is contemplating moving home next year as she really
misses the family and seeing the little one. She will be going to AZ fot
Thanksgiving to see Vicki and Norm and family, and Jessica and her husband,
Bob will be there - they are expecting a little one in March). Well, I
better dash as I need to run some errands and plan on meeting Stephen in
about 2 hrs. at QFC (he is on his way back from Port Angeles for his CG
drill - he only has one more drill in Dec. and then will be retiring - can't
believe he has been active for the last 20 yrs.  It will be nice to have one
extra weekend with him home each month.  Let us know about the article and
if you can't find it maybe John (our computer guru) can resurrect it- he has
been working out at Microsoft in Redmond and will be there for several
months for training for his company, Avanade - seems to like it. Bye for
now, tell the family hi, Love, Maureen and Stephen

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Kay:

That would be great.

Jeff

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/14/2001 08:44 AM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale Master Gas Agreements

Hi Jeff,

Did you want Stacy to take a look at this?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 08:43
AM ---------------------------

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
05/11/2001 05:04 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale  Master Gas Agreements

Attached are drafts of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for gas.  Upon
completion of a guaranty I will incorporate a section for same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


print
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 09:15 AM -----

	Joe Hartsoe
	11/01/2000 05:49 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
susan.j.mara@enron.com
		 cc: dbva@radix.net
		 Subject:

Folks  -- Attached is a summary of the Commission's Order on California.
Constitutional Crisis here we come.  Later JOE


$20

DG

"Brent Wallace" <bwallace@zahrsecurities.com> on 12/18/2000 09:54:54 AM
Please respond to <BWallace@zahrsecurities.com>
To: <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Stock

How cheap?

-----Original Message-----
From: Darron.C.Giron@enron.com [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:58 AM
To: bwallace@zahrsecurities.com
Subject: Stock

Quick, give me a cheap stock that looks promising.

DG


Note:   Update on ammonia plant operations.  Check out the economics in the last paragrph.  LB
Ammonia Industry Finally Approaches Full Production
Plummeting gas prices have prompted a large number of idled ammonia producers to restart operations this month, after lengthy downtime due to last winter's record gas price increases. Houston-based Industrialinfo.com, which tracks manufacturing, said most of the Gulf Coast and Midcontinent plants are at partial or full capacity.
An ammonia industry expert at Duke Energy said there has been a 20% increase in ammonia production (222,000 tons of ammonia) since August, representing about 7.6 Bcf of gas demand (34 MMBtu per ton of ammonia). There was a doubling of ammonia productive capacity in Louisiana alone. "We think just about every plant in the U.S. is back on or in the process of coming back up right now," he said. "Obviously they are not going to be running full out, but every plant is coming back up."
A year ago, ammonia producers were rocked by soaring natural gas prices, which reached $10/MMBtu, up from a historical average of $2. Combined with product overcapacity, the rising costs caused a wave of plant shutdowns across the country. Louisiana was particularly hard hit, with five out of eight ammonia plants idled during the summer. Arkansas, Georgia and Texas were among other ammonia producing states affected.
The recent decline in gas prices and inventory, however, has sparked some ammonia producers into ramping up production. Triad Nitrogen and PCS Nitrogen both resumed full production in September at their respective plants in Donaldsonville and Geismar, LA, Industrial Information reported. Terra Industries restarted a Verdigris, OK, plant after an extended shutdown and is expected to bring its Blytheville, AK, plant online sometime this month. Koch Industries and IMC Agrico, with plants in Sterlington, Donaldsonville, Convent and Uncle Sam, LA, are now operating at partial capacity.
Other ammonia manufacturers are waiting to see if natural gas prices remain stable before resuming production. DuPont in Beaumont, TX, Borden Chemical in Geismar, LA, and PCS in Augusta, GA, remain idled.
"It looks as if these guys are going to make money running their plants all winter," the Duke Energy ammonia industry expert said. "They are making less and less money as gas prices rise and ammonia prices fall. I see them at the closest to break-even by February where gas is averaging about $2.85.
"Last year the domestic producer margin was only about $3/ton," he said. "They pretty much broke even in terms of gas costs on average. This year they are probably going to make $20-25/ton of production. At $2.80/MMBtu for gas and 34 MMBtu of gas per ton of production, plus $25/ton of additional costs, it will cost them about $120/ton for ammonia production. In New Orleans they will probably cover that for most of the season."


Hello Steven,

I apologize, I combined two different presentations. Attached are the slides
for the CEO
Executive Presentation tomorrow from Margaret Carson.

Thank You
Katrina Burton
ext. 5--4498


Rosie -- I'm not sure if this went through ... I couldn't find it in my "sent
file".

Karen -- attached are the documents I mentioned to you a minute ago.


Jeff,

No problem. We shall invite her for an interview. A/A programs has real
problems with logistics.

Vince

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           08/22/2000 05:11 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: li sun

hi vince, i'm over in london so i'm sorry for not calling this morning.  i
met li last year and at wharton.  i'm sorry the a/a program did not contact
you earlier as they were supposed to.  li is a great modeller and would love
to work in your group.  thanks for taking care of her.  i'll be in touch
later.   jeff


When I got in this morning, there was a note on my desk from Andy saying you wanted to meet with him this morning.  I am supposed to let him know when.


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.


I live across from the lake and will take pictures in a minute.  You should
have them emailed to you in a few.

Jennifer Welch
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Hilary Smith [mailto:hsmith3@attglobal.net]
  Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:31 PM
  To: emca@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: *EMCA* water

  I just took some pictures of Lake Bomar using old fashioned film which we
probably won't develop for weeks. If someone has a digital camera and could
e-mail me a couple of pictures, I could print them and take them to Ada
Edwards' office Monday.

  Hilary

  At 02:35 PM 3/1/2002 -0600, you wrote:
  >>>>

    anyone interested in seeing how swampy the lake gets - drive down Bomar
toward taft and you'll see the "site" of discussion. A little rain goes a
long way...
    Nathalie

    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
    ADVERTISEMENT

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=215002.1818248.3328688.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050444
93:HM/A=847665/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vbW9uc3RlcjcuZGF0=1015014623%
3eM=215002.1818248.3328688.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705044493:HM/A=847665/R=1>

    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.

  <<<<

  (Mr.) Hilary Smith
  712 Bomar St.
  Houston TX 77006-1316
  713.523.0559
  Fax: 713.523.3928
  Website: http://pws.prserv.net/hilary


-----Original Message-----
From: Tennariello, Vincent G. [mailto:Vincent.Tennariello@pseg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:59 AM
To: Michael Fortugno (E-mail)
Subject: FW: New Palm Beach Ballot

-----Original Message-----
From: Meerdink, Eric P.
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:52 AM
To: Chamberlin, Thomas C.; Tennariello, Vincent G.; Buccisano, Vincent
D.; Tyurin, Eugene N.; Krupitsky, Alexander E.; Dietterle, Mary E.;
Janaitis, Mario A.; Burton, Pierson M.
Subject: FW: New Palm Beach Ballot

 - BallotWPBF11.11.00.doc
 - NoName


If he filed comments at FERC, they should be on FERC's web system called RIMS.  I will ask Sam to look into this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Shelk, John
Cc: Hueter, Barbara A.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Shortridge, Pat; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

Not that I am aware of--it looked like he was talking off of notes, but I was sitting behind him and couldn't see very well.  That's why I thought a transcript might be a good idea....or if he did have a prepared statement that he submitted to FERC, would they post it on a web site?  Question for Sarah?

-----Original Message-----
From: Shelk, John
Sent: Tue 10/23/2001 4:17 PM
To: Landwehr, Susan M.
Cc: Hueter, Barbara A.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Shortridge, Pat; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

Getting more information in this person and getting him to contact Congress is very important.  He is in the district of House Chief Deputy Whip Roy Blunt (R-MO), who is Cong. DeLay's right-hand man in the leadership.  He also serves on the Barton Subcommittee.  While Linda, Pat and I had breakfast with him next week, and he will be in Houston for next month, he and his staff stress that he is close to public power in his district, which includes Springfield, MO.  Did he have a prepared statement at the RTO Week hearing?

-----Original Message-----
From: Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Shelk, John
Cc: Hueter, Barbara A.; Robertson, Linda; Nord, Sue; Shortridge, Pat; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard; Guerrero, Janel; Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

John--this is the recap from Thursday afternoon of RTO week.  Although Andy did not focus on it in his report, there was an individual who sat on the panel from Missouri that did a fantastic job of supporting FERC and market postitions despite the fact that he is a public power guy.  His name is Bill Burks and he is the Associate General Manager of the City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri.  In his comments he stated that his utility was "wholeheartedly supporting FERC moving forward to push for on RTO" and then went on to talk about how Missouri is going to continue to suffer from seams issues if FERC doesn't stick to their guns on just a few major RTOs.

He stated that "flexible" standardization would not work and that the FERC should put out a platform of standardized tariffs and if there was some utility or group of stakeholders that thought they were special or unique or different, then the burden of proff should be on them to petition FERC for an exemption, not the other way around.

I'm thinking that this gentlemen would be an excellent choice for a committee hearing if you have the opportunity to suggest folks to testify in the future. IF you are able to get transcripts from RTO week, it might also be worth it to review his comments and pass them on as appropriate.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 4:46 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae; '/o=ENRON/ou=NA/cn=Recipients/cn=notesaddr/cn=a478079f-55e1f3b0-862566fa-612229'; Abler, William; Aggarwal, Anubhav; Allen, Diana; Arora, Harry; Bailey, Debra; Ballato, Russell; Ballinger, Ted; Baughman Jr., Don; Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Benson, Robert; Bentley, Corry; Blaine, Jay; Bolt, Laurel; Broderick, Paul J.; Broussard, Richard; Burnett, Lisa; Campbell, Larry F.; Capasso, Joe; Carson, Mike; Chen, Alan; Choate, Jason; Cline, Kevin; Collins, Dustin; Comeaux, Keith; Coulter, Kayne; Davis, Mark Dana; Day, Smith L.; Dean, Clint; Decook, Todd; Emesih, Gerald; Errigo, Joe; Forney, John M.; Freije, William; Garcia, Miguel L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Giron, Gustavo; Greer, Andrew; Gualy, Jaime; Guerra, Claudia; Gulmeden, Utku; Gupta, Gautam; Ha, Amie; Hanse, Patrick; Hernandez, Juan; Imai, Rika; Ingram, David; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Kaniss, Jason; King, Jeff; Kinser, John; Larkworthy, Carrie; Laurent, Dean; Laverell, Justin; Lenartowicz, Chris; Lorenz, Matt; Lotz, Gretchen; Lowell, Thomas; Mack, Iris; Mahajan, Ashish; Makkai, Peter; Marquez, Mauricio; Maskell, David; May, Tom; McElreath, Alexander; Miller, Jeffrey; Oh, Seung-Taek; Olinde Jr., Steve; Pace, Andy; Padron, Juan; Pan, Steve; Philip, Willis; Podurgiel, Laura; Poppa, John D.; Presto, Kevin M.; Quenet, Joe; Rawal, Punit; Rogers, Benjamin; Rust, Bill; Ryan, David; Saibi, Eric; Schiavone, Paul; Schneider, Bryce; Seely, Michael; Serio, Erik; Shoemake, Lisa; Simpson, Erik; Stalford, Robert; Stepenovitch, Joe; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Symms, Mark; Tamma, Ramanarao; Thomas, Paul D.; Trejo, Reese; Valdes, Maria; Vernon, Clayton; Wang, Steve; Williams, Ryan; Willis, Cory; Zipperer, Mike; Baughman, Edward D.; Clynes, Terri; Dalton III, Oscar; Kelly, Mike E.; Sewell, Doug; Valderrama, Larry; Walton, Steve; Roan, Michael; Perrino, Dave; Maurer, Luiz; Hueter, Barbara A.; Landwehr, Susan M.; Hoatson, Tom; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Yeung, Charles
Cc:
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Standards and Practices Panel

RTO Week

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


place,

hallo.
i forgot to ask you about stalking margo.
details please.
i have vacation this week, so i shall pester you
frequently.  hard to believe we were once able to hang
out daily. :(  hard to believe how much time i wasted
with she who is named after a season. :( :(
a goo goo goo goo goo.
went biking again today.  my ass is on fire, as i
stand to write this email.
i was bunny hopping like mad.
only went through 3 back wheels.
a goo goo.
i am glad that you decided to move to massachusetts if
the job does not work out.  excellent choice.  i have
a list of yoga instructors for you.  zach colburn was
highly recommended if you are willing to start the
sessions with a little ahab, and then twist yourself
into the flat-break.  unconventional? yes.  results.
mmm... no.  GT is another option, so long as you allow
him to beat your unprotected arm with his stick while
you meditate.  "stay out of the crease"- WHACK! "stay
out of the crease"- WHACK! "stay out of the crease"-
WHACK!  mark fink is still another consideration, so
long as you have enough clothes to provide him and all
his friends.
anyway, have a good day my friend.
-charles horton


The PPA auction is going along well I think.  We are leading on Sundance B
and have been for 3 rounds now.  Some weird things are occuring so it is too
early to tell what will utimately happen.  The government has said that it
will move to the third and final stage of the auction in the morning.  We
would be estatic if people continue to leave us alone on Sundance B.
Currently we are bid  $112,000,000 Canadian and a swap price of 33.5 CAD.
But again its too early to get our hopes up.


Here are your settles.  Thanks.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:06 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	daily settles

 << File: Daily Settles.xls >>


Attached you will find the Acceptance and Performance Evaluation Testing
document Scott has asked me to send to you.

Thank you,
Claudette Harvey


[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    PENDING MERGER EXPECTED TO INCREASE REVENUES BY OVER 500%  NEW CENTURY COMPANIES (NCNY)           Today?s  Special Situations Alert presents New Century Companies  (OTC BB: NCNY).      NCNY  is a manufacturer of precision quality machine tools  (a $30 billion dollar market) utilized in the production  of large diameter precision components for the aerospace  and energy industries.      NCNY?s  pending merger with Smith West Inc., a manufacturer  of machined components for jet engines, turbines for  power generation plants and machinery for the semi-conductor  industry, will add up to $50 million in annual revenues,  compared to $7.4 million last year ? an increase  of over 500%. (see June 29/01 press release)     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     New  Century Companies, Inc. Receives Additional New Power Generation  And Defense Industry Orders   Los Angeles, Nov. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- New Century Companies,  Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: NCNY) announced today that it had  received additional orders from a major Power Generation and  Defense Industry player, directly on the heels of the previous  orders announced on October 17, 2001.     "Our  manufacturing capabilities and track record, have placed  us on the radar screen of almost every major power generation  and defense industry company," remarked David Duquette,  CEO of New Century Companies, Inc. "As the economy  begins breaking out of this recession we are seeing an influx  of business from these fast growing industries. New Century  has also benefited from the departure of competition that  was unable to meet the challenges of the slowed economy.  Our order flow and backlog makes us confident that we are  poised for material growth over this next fiscal year and  beyond."  The  company is currently in negotiations for additional transactions  and anticipates closing more deals prior to the year-end.  About  New Century Companies, Inc.  New  Century, under its brand name Century Turn, specializes  in manufacturing, remanufacturing and retrofitting machine  tools, primarily Vertical Boring Mills and large Turning  Lathes. New Century is assisting in solving the current  power crisis. By offering remanufactured Vertical Boring  Mills, the company saves or conserves millions of dollars  per year in energy cost by re-utilizing the major castings  of each Vertical Boring Mill. These savings, generally in  the range of 40 to 60%, allow New Century to be the most  price competitive manufacturer of Vertical Boring Mills  in the U.S. These cost savings are passed on to New Century  customers and afford them the opportunity to manufacture  rotating turbine components for power generation at better  costs.  New  Century machines are also used by manufacturers of jet engine  components, airplane landing gear parts, oil and gas components,  to name a few. New Century currently manufactures its machines  in state-of-the art facilities in Santa Fe Springs, CA.  New Century maintains a website at www.newcenturyinc.com   .  For  further information, please contact Brock Malky of Insight  Capital, +1-412-363-5007.  Forward-looking  statements (statements which are not historical fact) in  this release are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions  of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements  involve risks and uncertainties, including those risks and  uncertainties detailed in the company's filings with the  Securities and Exchange Commission.     **IMPORTANT  NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER FROM EQUITYALERT.COM, INC.**  The purpose  of this advertisement, like any advertising, is to provide  coverage and publicity for the advertising company, its products  or services. The information provided in this advertisement  is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person  or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution  or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would  subject us to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction  or country. Verify all claims and do your own due diligence.  This advertisement is not a solicitation or recommendation  to buy, sell or hold securities and does not provide an analysis  of the financial position of the company. We recommend you  use the information found in this advertisement as an initial  starting point for conducting your own research on the advertised  company in order to determine your own personal opinion of  the company before investing. All information concerning the  advertised company contained herein should be verified independently  by an attorney, with such company and an independent licensed  securities analyst. We are not offering securities for sale.  An offer to buy or sell can be made only with accompanying  disclosure documents and only in the states and provinces  for which they are approved. Many states have established  rules requiring the approval of a security by a state security  administrator. Check with http://www.nasaa.org  and call your  state security administrator to determine whether a particular  security is licensed for sale in your state. Many companies  have information filed with state securities regulators and  many will supply investors with additional information on  request. All statements and opinions contained in this advertisement  are the sole opinion of the authors and are subject to change  without notice. We are not liable for any investment decisions  by our readers. Readers should independently investigate and  fully understand all risks before investing. It is strongly  recommended that any purchase or sale decision be discussed  with a financial adviser or broker prior to completing any  such purchase or sale decision. We are not registered investment  advisers, or broker-dealers, or members of any financial regulatory  bodies. The information contained in this advertisement is  provided as an information service only. The accuracy or completeness  of the information is not warranted and is only as reliable  as the sources from which it was obtained. We disclaim any  and all liability as to the completeness or accuracy of the  information and for any omissions of material facts. This  advertisement may contain hyperlinks to web sites operated  by third parties other than us. Such hyperlinks are provided  for the reader's reference and convenience only. We are not  responsible for the reliability of these external sites nor  are we responsible for any of the contents, advertising, products,  or other materials on such external sites. Our inclusion of  hyperlinks to such web sites does not imply any endorsement  of the material on such web sites or any association with  their operators. Under no circumstances shall we be held responsible  or liable, directly or indirectly, for any loss or damage  caused or alleged to have been caused in connection with the  use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services available  on such external site. Any concerns regarding any external  link should be directed to its respective site administrator  or webmaster. We may refer to other sources of information,  or other commentary. We intend to offer these items to readers  as additional sources of information, but disclaim any implication  that we endorse information contained in such outside sources.  Any referral by us is no guarantee of the accuracy of any  information provided by outside sources. As we disclaim any  representation concerning source reliability, readers must  contact information suppliers on their own and gauge to the  reader's satisfaction the truthfulness of any source information.  It should be understood that there is no guarantee past performance  will be indicative of future results. Any reference to past  performance(s) of companies previously advertised are specially  selected to be referenced based on the favorable performance  of these companies and the companies referenced may not be  representative of all past advertised companies as not all  past advertised companies may have performed as well. Readers  are cautioned that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk  investments and that they may lose all or a portion of their  investment if they make a purchase in our advertised stocks.In  order to be in full compliance with the U.S. Securities Act  of 1933, Section 17(b), we are receiving 50,000 shares of  New Century Companies, Inc. from a third party as compensation  for the distribution of this and other advertisements. Since  we are receiving compensation and hold stock in the advertised  company there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements  and opinions and such statements and opinions cannot be considered  independent. We will bnefit from any increase in share price  of the advertised company. We will sell our shares at any  time, without notice, be that before, during or immediately  after the release of this advertisement. The liquidation of  our stock may have a negative impact on the securities of  the company liquidated, including decreased market value and/or  dilution of the company's securities. Furthermore, our associates  and/or employees and/or principals may have stock positions  in advertised companies purchased in the open market or in  private transactions. These positions may be liquidated, without  prior notification, even after we have made positive comments  regarding the advertised company. It should be understood  that any price targets and/or projections mentioned are solely  opinions and should not be taken as suggested holding periods.  In fact, we will sell our positions in any companies advertised  before they reach such target prices. The receipt of this  information constitutes your acceptance of these terms and  conditions. Reading this advertisement shall not create under  any circumstances an offer to buy or sell stock in any company  advertised. Nor shall it create any principal-agent relationship  between the reader and us. The stocks of advertised companies  may trade in fast moving, highly volatile markets, and any  reader should observe the trading behavior of any advertised  company prior to investing. Advertised stocks are often thinly  traded and large sell orders will have a substantially negative  impact on share price. Investors in advertised stocks may  experience difficulty in selling shares without seeing a decline  in market price and may have difficulty in finding ready buyers  of their stock. Information within this advertisement contains  "forward looking" statements within the meaning  of Section 27(a) of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and Section  21(e) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements  that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions,  expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals,  assumptions or future events or performance are not statements  of historical facts and may be forward looking statements.  Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates  and projections at the time the statements are made that involve  a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual  results or events to differ materially from those presently  anticipated. Forward looking statements may be identified  through the use of words such as expects, will, anticipates,  estimates, believes, or by statements indicating certain actions  may, could or might occur. We encourage our readers to invest  carefully and read the investor information available at the  web sites of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)  at http://www.sec.gov  and the National Association of Securities  Dealers (NASD) at http://www.nasd.com . We also strongly recommend  that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet  Stock Fraud, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm .  The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully  at its web site. Readers can review all public filings by  companies at the SEC s EDGAR page. All information within  this advertisement is qualified in its entirety by the detailed  information and financial statements of the advertised company  contained in its regulatory filings with the SEC.     [IMAGE]


Start Date: 4/12/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041217.txt


Kay,  Please review the attached.  Once again, thanks for your help.


I would like to setup a new EOL product (Kern South of Muddy Creek).  Specific language is as follows:  The transaction is for delivery into kern pipeline, South of the Kern Muddy Creek Compressor station.  The seller shall determine the delivery point.  If you have any questions please call me.  Frank x-3-3002.  thanks


yea,  i think the two dumps in the market are when everybody realizes the
loss of demand, which is in the first 4 inj numbers.  customer buying and
fear about the summer will keep may at a decent level.  if my theory holds,
eventually that wont be enough to hold the market up and m pukes.  second
puke is in the winter when 4th quarter production is 4-5% on y/y basis,
demand still weak (economic weakness isn't a 3 month problem), industry
realizes that not only is it ok to get to 500-700 bcf in march but you
should, and early winter weather will not match 2000.  we develop large y/y
surplus in x and z.  z futures hold up because some risk premium still exists
for rest of winter.  by late december, just trying to find a home for gas.
think decent chance f futures finish with a 2 handle.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/25/2001 08:16:26 PM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: distillates

f puts?? you mean january?  u mean june and january???

John.Arnold@enron.com on 03/25/2001 07:30:38 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: distillates

just when i'm turning really bearish you're starting to turn bullish on me.
weather to me relatively unimportant.  yes, it will leave us with 30 bcf or
so less in storage than if we had mild weather.  i think it is masking a
major demand problem.  think what the aga numbers would be with moderate
weather.  when we get into injections, i think we'll see a big push down.
spec and trade seem bearish but hesitant to get short.  customer buying
still strong.  thus even with the demand picture becoming clearer, we
haven't moved down.  however i think when the picture becomes clearer (i.e.
-when we start beating last year's injections by 20 bcf a week), trade will
get short.  customers very unsophistocated.  the story they keep telling us
is we're coming out 400 bcf less than last year, thus the summer has to be
strong.  when we start inj, customers will start seeing other side of
story.  pira finally came out this week and said stop buying.  to me, the
mrkt just a timing issue.  i want to be short before the rest of the idiots
get short.  i continue buying m,f puts.  projecting k to settle 450 and m
400.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/23/2001 01:44:10 PM

To:   jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  distillates

this strength cud persist awhile-is a little bullish ngas demand since we
now
above parity in some places. shit theres so many things shaking my faith on
the
short bias of this thing. weather hot /west cold est, hydo, califronia,mkt
talking new engl shortages.oil demand cont to show stellar y on y and curve
recoveriung, opec hawkish stance for px support.
  i think we close the y on y gap still significantly but im starting to
question how when,how much and how long prices come off in apr-jun?
thanks god i can trade oil cuz i have made anything in ngas to speak of.
short
term still sort of neutral ngas-beleive we range bound. u prob know this
but
hearing texas rr data coming out pretty bearish prodcution-good news .
regards


Great Job Vince.  I know people will be knocking themselves over for the
book.  I know for a fact that the consultants can make a lot of money just
'reselling' stuff that are in the book!  I know first hand since D&T did that
with even the first version.

I think the FAS 133 article by some out-of-work nuclear engineer was the bomb!

Ravi.


I just entered a deal in Sitara (deal 399824).  This is a sale to Transco at
St 65, 50,000/day on the 18th - 30th.  I also entered a transport usage deal
399826 for 50,000/day starting on the 18th.  This deal captures the commodity
cost to go from our St 65 pool to the SIMS pool.

Comments/Questions?


Approved.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

Tracy Geaccone
12/13/2000 04:33 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Expense Report

For your approval.

Thanks

Tracy
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Campos
12/13/2000 03:47 PM
To: Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Expense Report

Tracy,

Attached is your expense report, please review and forward for approval.

Thanks,
Kathy