Here's the memo I mentioned.  Obviously, we have already used up all the good
ideas and are down to the fall back plans.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/27/2000
05:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           06/27/2000 02:24 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, SStojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Topock

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Here's an idea:  PG&E's world has changed a bit since they executed the '97
interconnect agreement.  Back then, I think the majority of Line 300 capacity
was held by PG&E for the benefit of the core customers.  Some of the capacity
was held by contract transport customers, but not that much.  (maybe
100,000-200,000 dth out of 1.14 bcf/d??)   Now, I understand that PG&E still
retains some line 300 capacity for the core, but a lot more of it is
allocated out to contract transport customers.  Do you guys know how much was
in each of those buckets then and now?  My theory is as follows:

1.  As to the capacity that it retains in its own name for the benefit of its
core customers, PG&E has absolute discretion as to how to use the capacity.
They can nominate and schedule volumes at TW/Topock some days and nom. and
schedule zero on others.  They can be totally arbitrary and not schedule
anything for extended periods even though they are paying demand charges on
TW and may incur costs on their gas purchase contracts in the San Juan or
elsewhere (eventually this would get the CPUC's attention, I guess).  Even if
there were no interconnect agreement or operating agreement with TW on the
pcb issue, there is just not much we can do to control how PG&E dispatches
gas supply.

2.  PG&E's transport contracts with third parties are a different story.
Those parties, not PG&E,  decide how much to nom. every day.  If PG&E is
going to refuse to schedule a valid nom. from a transport customer, PG&E has
to declare force majeure on its system or declare a capacity
constraint-related curtailment.  PG&E has some discretion as a prudent
operatory of its system, but not nearly as much discretion as it does as to
its own portfolio.

3.  If 1 and 2 are correct, then the question arises:  Does PG&E have to
declare force  majeure on its own system in order to shut us down at Topock?
If the amount of capacity they have in bucket no. 1 above exceeds 300
million/d, they may be able to shut us down and continue to honor all of
their transport contracts.  But what if PG&E's transport customers continue
to nominate TW/Topock even though PG&E is making alternative receipt point
capacity available for them at El Paso Topock or somewhere else?  If TW
stands by ready to confirm those customers' noms, then I think we can force
PG&E to declare force majeure on its own system.

4.  I'm not sure no. 3 above makes any difference for us.  At minimum, it
focuses the attention on PG&E and not us.  Remember Erin Brockovich?  They
will hate that.  I'm sure their spin doctors will point the finger at us, but
once they declare force majeure, the PR damage is done.  Also, and more
importantly, the standards applying to PG&E's declaration of force majeure
are much more stringent than the standards under the operating agreement.
We will probably have a much stronger position in litigation if the issue is
"did PG&E have adequate basis for declaring force majeure" than if the issue
is "did TW violate the 1 ppm standard under the operating agreement."

Please let me know what we know about the capacity situation on Line 300 and
give me any reactions to this idea.  Thanks. DF


I attach a presentation nicely prepared mostly by Akshay Singh and the
Telecommunications portion by B.A.N. Sharma.  This contains general
information on India that you may find useful.  Please distribute this on to
others who may have use for the information.  I apologize for the size of the
file.


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 03:01 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	03/14/2001 02:46 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Quan-Hill, Danielle" <danielle.quan-hill@mirant.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Bob Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
"Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Parquet"
<dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Doug
Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Ed
Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Eric
Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>,
"Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "kent Palmerton"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>,
"Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Ross Ain" <rain@caithnessenergy.com>,
"Stephanie Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steven
Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<sheryl_gussett@reliantenergy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net>,
"Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary Rudman"
<cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Delany
Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith"
<djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Jamie
Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Marie
Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>,
"Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>,
"Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Scott
Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan McCabe"
<smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Theo Pathos" <theo@ppallc.com>
		 Subject: Fw: IEP et all amendments to ABX1 60

Attached are amendments to AB 60x which IEP is presenting today at a 2:30
meeting with Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg.  As a follow-up to the meeting,
IEP member company lobbyists will join me on a conference call at 3:45 today
to discuss strategy on "shopping" this language to the Assembly
Appropriations Committee members.  You are welcome to join in on that
conference call.

Dial In Number     (800) 891-9585
Participant Code   756453

-- Julee

> Here it is as we discussed.
>
> Bullets on the amendments:
>
> 1) Amendments are intended to help load serving entities secure contract
for
> power for California loads from California resources without unnecessarily
> delaying or disrupting the development of projects within California.
> 2) It is necessary to remove vague and ambiguous language from the bill
that
> could disrupt current or new projects or undermine commercial arrangements
> already in place. Specifically, the language that calls for comparisons of
> offers is particularly difficult to implement and will It is necessary to
> remove language
>
> Andy Brown
> Ellison, Schneider & Harris


Yes, those are the numbers I have gone by and I have
already done my shopping!!! :-)  Anyway, we really
have to get going on MOm and Dad's gift so I can feel
like I am getting somewhere.  Anyone interested in
taking responsibility for the shopping around????
Speak up now!  Also, did I hear besides shopping for
the kiddie KK, we can/should shop for our
godchildren???  Someone please let me know.

Where should adult KK gifts be sent??  To the couples
home or if they live in NY, to Mom and Dads???

Ben and I got our first tree this year--how exciting!!
 We got it and put it up today.  It looks beautiful if
I do say so myself.  Here is a new list for Ben and I
since Maeve doesn't think it is appropriate for me to
ask for china and things Ben probably doesn't want---
Ben-- a BROWN snap on Tiffany belt (for the silver
buckle)  they will know what you mean.  Dee-maybe your
friend can get this at a discount???  Any Beatles
CD's--  I think one is called Beatles One--  or a
Beatles box set (if there is one)---or camel color
cordeuroy's from POLO (don't know how much they are)
in a 38 X 32--
Now for ME--spode china 5 PPS,  anything from Tiffany
(if you are going there for Ben's gift) again,
Dee-maybe you can get at a discount???-- earrings
(silver balls) or bracelet (silver balls),  tiffany
heart necklace, etc., I also saw at POLO (if you go
there for Ben's gift) a tea pot to go with our
everyday Claire Pattern,  there are these miniature
stand up figures called "The Carolers" (I know Talbots
has some), that I am collecting (department stores may
have them also) about a foot tall--they all look like
they are singing.
Anyway, I hope this gives some more ideas for our
KK's.  Hope you all had a great weekend!  Oh, I have
our address for Colorado (but please send to arrive
after the 16th)
Rogers
114 Bermuda Drive
Edwards, CO  81632
Thanks so much!!  Meg and Ben

--- James Fredian <michaela.jim@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> Those numbers sound good to me.
>
> mer
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <DRobin1962@aol.com>
> To: <megrogers_99@yahoo.com>;
> <maeve_robinson@omnicomny.com>;
> <drobinson@cshnyc.org>; <robinson.rosicki@juno.com>;
> <Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com>;
> <patandnora@hotmail.com>; <creelj@pfizer.com>;
> <Cdoveala@aol.com>; <michaela.jim@worldnet.att.net>
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: kk wish list
>
>
> > Hi everyone just wanted to confirm those
> numbers....again 125 for adult KK
> > and $30 for kid Kris Kringle...someone please
> respond....thanks...we want
> to
> > make sure that we are spending the correct amount
> since these are the only
> > family gifts we are exchanging..thanks
> >
> > Whats the deal for mom and dad....if its a
> computer..should we be shopping
> > around...if its a bbq should we decide on how
> much?xmas is just 3 wks
> away...
> >
> > Also for Owen and I....there are 2 knives we would
> like...Liz has the name
> > of a wholesaler..I will tell you the style#'s..or
> we would love a new
> chair
> > to match
> > our backyard set...can give that info too...or a
> play...
> >
> > hope ll is well..xoxoxoxox
> >
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


Revised with language from the Master.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


I stand corrected - we need to DASH everything over $500K.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

David Gorte
11/02/2000 07:28 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Commodity / Embedded Finance Deals

Dave,

As of today, the Transaction Approval Process requires that any embedded
financing over $500,000 needs to be DASHed.  RAC, however, is close to
finishing a new process for commodity embedded financings--both prepaids and
tilted swaps--that would not require a full DASH but an abbreviated approval
document based upon specified credit ratings, financing amounts, and
maturities for transactions having standard credit documentation.  For
example, a $25 million, five-year exposure to a AAA counterparty with
standard documentation is contemplated to be approved via this abbreviated
approval document.  This abbreviated approval document would only be
available for transactions meeting these criteria if:  (i) structured
financing capacity were available, (ii) the funds flow issue created is
manageable (both (i) and (ii) as confirmed by EGF), and (iii) the pricing met
a threshold that included the structured financing cost, an appropriate
credit spread/reserve, and a syndication risk premium.

The abbreviated approval document is intended to expedite the approval of
relatively straightforward embedded financings where a full DASH is
impractical or inefficient.  It is presently contemplated that the
abbreviated approval document could be approved with two signatures:  the
Originator's and  a RAC signature (either Bill Bradford's or mine), with
business unit management and EGF receiving weekly updates on transactions
approved via this document, but I would welcome your thoughts on this.  In
any event, I will provide you with the proposed abbreviated process by you
for your review and concurrence before if it is implemented since the
preponderance of these transactions are expected to be originated by ENA.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Regards,

Dave

David W Delainey
11/02/2000 09:25 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Commodity / Embedded Finance Deals

Tim, I would argue that we should pursue this business as long as a) we are
being adequately compensated for the financing and underlying commodity risk;
b) we have very good paper; c) we are dealing with solid credits and are
charging an appropriate risk adjusted cost of capital for the underlying
financing; d) we have the ability to syndicate the capital or funds flow
position if needed to manage cash issues and e) that RAC is comfortable that
we are reaching these goals.

Any imbedded financing or $5M or more should be DASHED.  David, Joe and Mark
should be your key contacts to ensure we are adequately managing these issues
but I do not see any fatal flaw in the strategy if priced/managed well and we
watch the funds flow issues.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
09:15 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           10/31/2000 01:54 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Commodity / Embedded Finance Deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 10:57 AM
---------------------------
From: Tim Belden on 10/31/2000 11:54 AM
To: Dave Delainey
cc:
Subject: Commodity / Embedded Finance Deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 10:56 AM
---------------------------
From: Tim Belden on 10/31/2000 11:52 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dave Delainey
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Commodity / Embedded Finance Deals

We have closed the following deals where we deliver power two a muni in the
short term and get paid back power later on.  These deals have both a
commodity and a finance portion:

Counterparty    Loan Period  Repayment Period  Amount Financed

Grant County    7/01 to 7/06   7/06   $4.7 million
Grant County    5/01 to 7/06   7/06   $5.7 million
Avista/Kaiser    7/2000   7/2000 to 7/2006   $31.3 million
BPA/Kaiser    9/2000   7/2001 to 9/2001   $36 million
Clatskanie    11/2000 to 9/2001 10/2001 to 9/2006  $5 million
Eugene Water and Electric  1/2001 to 3/2002  11/2001 to 4/2002  $4.9 million
Eugene Water and Electric  7/2001 to 12/2002 5/2002 to 12/2002  $7.3 million

We are seeing demand for more of these.  For example, Tacoma City Light is
looking at $35,000,000 + in this type of structure.  What do you guys need to
know about this business and how much of an appetite do we have for this?


Spoke w/Claudia


what is going on?  i don't think we need your tickets.  if you want me to try
to sell them there i will.  how was labor day weekend for you?  what did you
do?


Attached please find the amended and restated Cinergy Marketing and Trading
guaranty.  The guaranty has been revised to increase the amount from $9.5 mil
to $15 mil.  Please obtain signature by all four managers listed in the
signature block.  If you have any questions, please call me at 853-3512.


In addition to the exchange seats,  MG London is also licensed as an FCM and
CTA with the CFTC --- the Enron acquisition requires a re-registration with
respect to these licenses, and perhaps a great deal of unwanted
disclosure/reporting burdens on Enron

	Mark Taylor@ECT
	08/04/2000 10:59 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: MG - US Regulatory Status...

FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 10:58 AM -----

	Jon Barrett@MGLTD
	08/04/2000 10:58 AM

		 To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: MG - US Regulatory Status...

Justin

Sorry for the delay in catching up with my e-mails. Yes, MG London Inc is the
clearing member of NYMEX/COMEX and is FCM & CTA. The only other MG companies
who have any exchange/regulatory registrations are in the UK and are
Metallgesellschaft Ltd (LME & SFA, also LIFFE to come), MG Brokers Ltd (LME &
SFA), MG Metal & Commodity Co Ltd (LME only).

Rgds

Jon

Justin Boyd@ECT
31/07/2000 20:53
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG - US Regulatory Status...

Jon,

Grateful if you could complete the picture for me and for Mark Taylor.    Is
MG London Inc. the entity that is the Clearing Member of NYMEX + a Futures
Commission Merchant and Commodity Trading Advisor?   Do any other (MG)
entities have similar registrations, and if so, what are these?

Thanks

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 31/07/2000 20:47
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 28/07/2000 16:44 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG

Justin:

Do you know whether we have acquired any companies with CFTC registrations of
any kind (e.g. Commodity Trading Advisor or Futures Commission Merchant)?  I
was wondering who was responsible for compliance matters if we have.

I hope you're well and all my best to Fran.

Mark


TELEPHONE NUMBERS:  (281) 297-5146 & (281) 297-5147

FAX NUMBERS:  (281) 297-5148, (281) 297-5149, & (281) 297-5150

THESE NUMBERS WILL BE ACTIVE DURING THE CONFERENCE.  SHOULD YOU NEED TO SEND
A FAX  PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE, THE MAIN FAX NUMBER TO THE WOODLANDS IS:
(281) 364-6234.

AGAIN, SHOULD ANY OF THESE NUMBERS CHANGE, WE WILL CONTACT PAT RADFORD IN THE
HOUSTON OFFICE.  HER TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (713) 853-9282.  IN THE EVENT YOU
CANNOT REACH PAT, THE MAIN NUMBER TO THE WOODLANDS CONFERENCE CENTER IS (281)
367-1100.


we can go now


Joe Wright, Vice Chairman of Terremark Communications (market cap:  $700MM),
is planning to call you regarding energy outsourcing discussions recently
begun between EES and Terremark's telecom carrier hotel subsidiary, Telecom
Routing Exchange Developers, Inc. ("T-REX").   T-REX is a developer and owner
of carrier hotels that house telecom, internet, and broadband communications
equipment.

Joe has previously served as Vice Chairman of W.R. Grace & Co. and served in
Ronald Reagan's cabinet as Director of the OMB.

I believe he wishes to speak with you to highlight his team's discussions
with EES.

Tom Kalb
Bundled Sales/40co
x58527


jcrew.com clearance
	?
	250 new styles. up to 60% off
	?
	[IMAGE]
	?
	click here

[IMAGE]

- ribbed lambswool crew
- bedford cord pant

- barn jacket
- dotted line polo

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	- wool pea coat
	- elbow-length tee

	- merino cardigan
	- refined shell

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
To unsubscribe from the email list, click here [IMAGE]


Greetings:

Steve Kean and I met today with Jack Stewart, Pres. of the California
Manufacturer's and Technology Ass. and Alan Zaremberg, CEO of the California
Chamber of Commerce.

Jack Stewart was happy to hear about our efforts and is generally
supportive--particularly regarding direct access--but wants more information
regarding the core/noncore proposal.  We have a meeting set up for Thursday
morning at 8 AM in the SF office to discuss it further.  Stewart will bring
Keith McCrea, long-time lawyer for CMA to the meeting on Thursday.

Zaremberg was extremely happy to hear about our efforts and the overall
package, and was much more receptive to the core/noncore proposal.  Though
he, too, would like more details.  Turns out the he and Bill Hauck--former
Wilson administration official and now head of the California Business
Roundtable---have been walking the halls of the capital urging the same thing
we've been urging, i.e., D's and R's need to get together (read "grow up")
and do a comprehensive deal.

Steve and I had an impromptu meeting with Hauck, and then I followed up with
him in the afternoon---he, too, is very supportive.

We stressed how important it is for business leaders to aggresively support
and pitch:

1) the idea that both sides of the aisle, and the governor, need to resolve
this now, and
2) the framework for a comprehensive solution along the lines that we've
described.

They agree, and while we have a good bit of additional work to due before
they are vociferous advocates for the core/noncore proposal, they certainly
didn't reject the idea.

Will report back on the Thursday follow-up with CMTA.

Best,
Jeff


Forgot to ask you to let me know when you get the message!  SRS


Drogi Vincenty. Skoro Ty byles na tyle mily ze zadzoniles osmielam sie i ja
zaimejlowac do Ciebie . W dniach 29.04 do 7.05 bede w USA. Cel turystyczny do
moich znajomych z roku. W programie mam wiele. Glowna baza Idahi Springs. Lece
z mija corka i kolegami z roku. Nie znam Twojego miejsca zamieszkania, ale
moze . Tefon moich znajomych chyba 303 567 0190, adres e-mailowy
<Wgoleb@aol.com> Pzdrawiam Zofia Grodek. Oni maja na nazwisko Golebiowscy.

____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1


Janet, I received your message and heard you loud and clear.  We need to
diversify the talent working on your deals.  Let's get you together with
Julia next week to discuss.

	Janet R Dietrich
	06/06/00 04:01 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Chris Gaffney

I just heard that Chris Gaffney is transferring to the Toronto office. His
skill sets/capabilities have been critical in the closing of both the UI and
NSTAR deals and he has been actively engaged in the long-term NSTAR deal,
Con-Ed, and our Project Green Jacket. It is critical to our business to have
no transitional period with attorneys and I expect his replacement to be
fully up to speed (i.e. knowledge of the power market, understanding of
structured power transactions, etc) relative to definitive documents around
these transactions. Chris is definitely a loss to our team. Please advise as
to his qualified replacement on these specific deals.  Thanks.


check with nowlan etc about this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

Patrick Danaher@ENRON
10/26/2000 02:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: mkt thoughts

How about tomorrow 10/27/00 @ 3:00 PM in room # 3143d?


STSW has parked megawatts with PNM for HE 1-4 on 5/23 at Four Corners.

The schedule is as follows:

HE 1 	10 mw
HE2	20 mw
HE3	19 mw
HE4	5  mw

Day total is 54mws.

Please sell this power real time at 4C and make the deal under the STSW book.  Link the sale to deal number 618854.  RT position manager is out by this deal.  The tag # for the delivery to PNM is 23100.

Please call me with any questions.
Thank You


See attached revised Article 4.6 Masters below.

Dp

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 05:41 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	03/27/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Sempra, Reliant, AEP

These look fine to me.  Go ahead and forward to Brant if you are ready.

	Debra Perlingiere
	03/27/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sempra, Reliant, AEP

Revised  Article 4.6

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Well, it looks like we are actually announcing the Blockbuster deal next
Wednesday!  Blockbuster has agreed to most of the language but the stuff in
bold (or nonbold in the case of the headline) has not been agreed to.  Please
take a look, but do not circulate until Monday with others--we are missing a
few pieces and there could be more changes.  Wanted you to see how it is
shaping up.

Ken Lay helped get a number of issues resolved this week by accompanying
Blockbuster to various partner and studio meetings and we really appreciate
it.  He is therefore coming for the webcast taping on Tuesday and the dinner
we are hosting for our partners even if Blockbuster and Enron are the only
two to participate.

Will keep you posted.  Mark, thanks for the reminder on managing expectations
about how this goes over.  When I reminded Hirko and Rice that we make this
announcement as great as possible, but the market decides if they like it and
cover it, they promised not to fire me next week because of the Blockbuster
deal.


I've adopted two children for the Enron Kids Program ..

Cortesia Taylor, Kindergarden
Jameka McCoy, PreK

The total cost for both children combined is guesstimated to be $350.  If all
of us contribute, that will be only $15 per person.  I'll be taking
collections this week and next if anyone is interested.

Thanks,
Laura


STILL the best way to handle those wacky Colstrip cuts.  Please familiarize
yourself with the procedure then check with me if you have questions.

Thanks,
Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 03/05/2001
06:43 AM ---------------------------

Jeremy Morris
06/27/2000 11:59 PM
To: Portland Shift
cc:

Subject: FASTEST, EASIEST, AND CORRECT WAY TO HANDLE COLSTRIP CUTS IN ENPOWER

1.)In enpower, build an index forward buy from PGE under LTNW book for the
total amount of mws cut due to colstrip going down.  Use the DOW JONES MIDC
index (remember to specify in the index if it is on or off-peak).  Enter an
offset of .10  .

2.) Enter a transmission deal from BPA.   (MIDC to MPC SYS)  The transmission
fee is $2.52

3.) Go into deal scheduling and query  under the counterparty PGE.  Select all

4.) bring up all deals of the counterparties involved at Colstrip----
specifically, Ashgrove,Conocpil, Energywesr, Louisiana Pacific, and Smurfit
Stone.
 (these enpower deal numbers can be located under the counterparties name in
lotus notes.)

5.)Zero out the buy from PGE @MPC SYS

6.) Finally link the deals.

7.) check real time postion manager, you should be flat after this.

This is basically how Diana Scholtes explained it to me.  It worked and
hopefully it will work for all


Peter

A couple of things you might be able to use for Steve. Unfortunately, no time
to convert to slides, but
this should provide enough raw material for you.

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Styles, Peter
Sent: 30 May 2001 15:53
To: Shapiro, Richard
Cc: Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ENRON; Devlin, Brendan; Dindarova,
Nailia; Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ENRON; Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ENRON; Alfredo
Huertas/LON/ECT@ENRON; Teun Van Biert/LON/ECT@ENRON; Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ENRON;
Dernehl, Ginger; McVicker, Maureen
Subject: Steve Kean's speech on California, Madrid 12/6; EURELECTRIC mission
to the USA: Report

Rick: Here's the "draft" Eurelectric report (never saw final, but don't think
it's materially different.)

Would be good if whoever is updating Jim Steffes slides from 29/3 could take
a steer from the issues the report concentrates on, and either endorse/
explain them, or rebut/ disentangle them. Also we should bear in mind theme
of Madrid conferenc is convergence of power and gas markets/ regulation, so
gas market aspects for Western Area will be of partic. interest. Items to
de-emphasise in very short slot available may be workings of PX and NOx
credits trading.

For potential lessons of relevance to Europe, I think Steve should
concentrate on dangers in: decoupling of wholesale and retail market,
attempted upfront guaranteed benefits to smaller consumers, and absence of
adequate demand side, and generation investment, signals.

Alfredo, Teun, Paul and Paul: As mentioned in staff meeting yesterday, would
appreciate your one or two slides each of bullet points on lessons for/
reassurance of irrelevance to (as the case may be!) your markets by end this
week. Steve is away, so Rick and I will take a look at pulling this together
intitially.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:18
PM ---------------------------

"Sandra James" <Sandra_James@electricity.org.uk> on 04/10/2001 05:15:33 PM
To: <Nailia.Dindarova@enron.com>, <Peter.Styles@enron.com>,

Subject: Fwd: EURELECTRIC mission to the USA : Report

Please see attached a report by EURELECTRIC on their recent study visit to
California.

>  <<Report USA.pdf>>

 - Report USA.pdf << File: Report USA.pdf >>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	"Z" @ New Hire Focus Mtg. 8:AM-10:AM

Date:		3/8/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079881&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079881
Request Create Date : 12/20/01 12:17:08 PM
Requested For       : philip.polsky@enron.com
Resource Name       : LiveLink ENA
Resource Type       : Applications


How are you today?
Things are OK down here!
Nothing really new since last night!

NYMEX went against me big time this morning so I decided to get flat.
That will mean a $1,000,000 loss today but I will still be positive for the month!
Its the little things that count, right!

They continue to hate ENE!
It really makes me wonder?

Be Safe!
Swig


Rick,

I want to bring  Aram Sogomonian back to Enron at s VP level.
According to new human resources procedures this decision requires
a support of three senior executives.

I want to ask you to express your opinion on Aram (based on a phone interview
or just on your past interactions with him). You can send a reply to Norma
Villarreal at H/R.

Thanks.

Vince


As we discussed on the phone, Mike Garred with CES is requesting a copy of
the CES demand charge sheet.  Please let me know if you approve.


Thanks Jim!  I'm looking forward to the challenge!  df

From: James Saunders/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 07:11 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FW: Organization Announcement

Drew - CONGRATS!!   I'm sure you'll do a great job, and hope you enjoy your
expanded opportunities.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


At long last!


Please visit http://tradeworld2000.com
The Internet's Premier site for Recommendations, Education, and powerful
charts & tools!
For subscr or unsubscr instructions,
please see the bottom of this message.

HotToday - http://TradeWorld2000.com
______December the 12th, 2000__________
-------------------------------------------------------
CTS HOT TODAY...By Nick Van Nice
-------------------------------------------------------
_________Volume 2, Number 208 __________

Good morning everyone, the purpose of CTS Hot Today is to help
you prepare for the trading day ahead.

--------------------------------------------------------
Nick's Trading Tip of the Day (12/12)
--------------------------------------------------------

"Develop a Solid Daily Routine" (A classic from the archives)

Some of the best traders I know are incredibly disciplined
about their daily routine. They believe their routine gives them an
edge and they will not trade with out it. For your benefit, I will
describe the routine that my Father passed along to me.

It all starts with the Benjamin Franklin secret to success;
Early to bed and early to rise.
In bed by 10:00 PM ET and up at 5:00 am ET.
Watch CNBC for 15 to 20 minutes to see what developed
in over night action. Exercise for 30 minutes and then have a
well balanced breakfast.  Arrive at the trading desk by 6:30 am
EST.
Print out all CTS weekly and daily charts and look for our
preferred technical set-ups. Look for well established trends
that were under going intermediate term corrections back to major
support (resistance levels).
After finding the best 2 to 3 trade opportunities for that day,
go to the hourly charts. If inclined to buy, consider waiting
until hourly stochastics are oversold. For new shorts, require
stochastics to be overbought. To refine timing for entry and exit,
look for clear cut Elliott wave patterns or classical price
patterns on the hourly charts. The hourly Elliott wave patterns
are tradable, because you know quickly when you're wrong.

This routine may or may not work for you.  The main point I'm
trying to make, is that every trader needs a routine that he or she
believes in. The routine helps you focus your research and thus
maximize your ability to find winning trades.

N

-------------------------------------------------------
Key Technical Developments (close of 12/11)
-------------------------------------------------------
The December Canadian dollar is retesting the neckline of the large
head and shoulders top as seen on the weekly charts. The pattern
projects a decline to the 62.00 level over the next few months.

The March Yen is pausing above long term support. A decline below
Friday's low near 91.24 opens the door for a massive decline of 700-
1000 points over the next few months.

Nearby hogs got quite a boost from the nasty weather over the
midwest. Blizard conditions will likely take their toll on nearby
supplies.

-------------------------------------------------------
Opportunity Alerts (Links to premium content)
-------------------------------------------------------
The following are shortcuts to key links for our TradeWorld2000.com
premium subscribers. If you are not a subscriber, it costs only
$29.95 to have access to all of this and much more for the next 30 days.
That's right! Less than $1 per day...

Hot Commodity Trends!
See the CTS Market Selector.
<http://tradeworld2000.com/cts/market/msc.pdf>

AOL Users Click Here

See the daily trend watch
<http://tradeworld2000.com/cts/market/DTWfs.htm>.

AOL Users Click Here

See MR-2 alert!
<http://tradeworld2000.com/cts/market/mr2_fs.htm>.

AOL Users Click Here

CTS Stock Selector
<http://tradeworld2000.com/cts/stockad/mss.pdf>.

AOL Users Click Here

See CTS Hot Stock Alert
<http://tradeworld2000.com/cts/stockad/soh_fs.htm>.

AOL Users Click Here

If the above links do not work, then consider accepting my invitation
to subscribe to TradeWorld 2000.com. It will give you a serious edge!

------------------------------------------------------
Traders'Key Report Calendar
------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, December the 12th

USDA crop report- before markets open.

No others

Wednesday, December the 13th

8:30 am ET
Nov. Retail Sales - .1%

Thursday, December the 14th

8:30 am ET
Oct Business Inventories - est .3%

November PPI - est .2%.
Worldwide crop production report

Friday, December the 15th

8:30 am ET
Nov. CPI - est .2%
9:15 am ET
Nov Industrial Production - est .1%
Capacity Utilization - 81.9%

______________________________________________________

I hope you found today's message helpful.

Your partner in futures trading,

Nick Van Nice

P.S. E-mail me your comments to:
nvannice@ctsinternet.com <mailto:nvannice@ctsinternet.com>.
-------------------------------------------------------
House Keeping Notes
-------------------------------------------------------
CTS HotToday is a free service for subscribers
of CTS Financial Publishing and TradeWorld2000.

If you do not wish to receive CTS HotToday, it's easy
to unsubscribe. Simply, follow the instructions at the bottom
of this email.

Please address your comments and suggestions for this
column to me at nvannice@CTSInternet.com <mailto:nvannice@CTSInternet.com>.

Please be aware that links to CTS paid content will
work only for paid subscribers of TradeWorld2000.com.
For subscription information, please see our site:
<http://TradeWorld2000.com>
AOL Users Click Here
Or call 1-800-331-1069.
___________________###_______________________
CTS HOT TODAY is a service of CTS Financial
Publishing, 1201 U.S. Highway 1, Suite 350, North
Palm Beach, FL 33408, , 2000.
This e-zine is a free service for CTS customers and
friends, by request.

If you are receiving this message, you are already
subscribed. Friends and colleagues may subscribe by
signing up on the main page at TradeWorld2000.com

To see what TradeWorld2000 has to offer, or to
discover more about the many and varied CTS
products, please visit:
<http://TradeWorld2000.com>.

AOL Users Click Here

DISCLAIMER: Past performance is not indicative of
future results. The ideas expressed in this document
should be viewed in an educational light. Use the
concepts and trade suggestions to help stimulate
prudent decision-making ideas. As with all
speculation, there is risk of loss. It is up to
each individual to determine his or her own
financial suitability. Any mention to profits relate to
hypothetical profits and may not accurately reflect
the slippage and commissions in the real market.
Trading futures is highly risky and should only be
done after seeking the services of a registered series
3 broker or Certified Financial Planner. Use this information
at your own risk.

Please refer a friend who might enjoy this FREE resource. We welcome new
members.

To subscribe to CTS Hot Today, create new mail message and send it to:
majordomo@ctsinternet.com

In the body of the message type:
subscribe CTSHotToday you@youraddress.com

To unsubscribe to CTS Hot Today, create new mail message and send it to:
majordomo@ctsinternet.com

In the body of the message type:
Unsubscribe CTSHotToday you@youraddress.com

Please mail all questions/comments to: hottoday@ctsinternet.com

Please refer a friend who might enjoy this FREE resource. We welcome new
members.


Attached is a revised form of Credit Letter.  Please disregard the version
previously distributed today.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2001 12:25 PM -----

	Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/18/2001 12:23 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Org Announcement

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC@ENRON
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:46 AM
To: ENW Domestic Employee List@ENRON
Cc: Frevert, Mark; Whalley, Greg; Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise; Sherriff,
John; Stanley, Brian; Dodson, Keith; McConnell, Mike; Shankman, Jeffrey A.;
McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; McDonald, Rebecca; Hughes, James A.;
Pickering, Mark; Brown, Michael
Subject: Org Announcement

To better leverage intellectual capital across Enron Net Works, we have
several organizational announcements to share with you:

Sally Beck, Tom Gros and Beth Perlman will work together to direct our
efforts to &commercialize8 our mid and back office services.  They will
report to the ENW Office of the Chair.  Sally will continue to lead the
day-to-day operations of our mid & back office.  In addition to leading the
development and marketing of Commodity Logic, Tom will have primary
responsibility for the marketing of our mid & back office services.  Beth
will continue to lead IT development for the Americas, including Commodity
Logic and all other systems necessary to deliver mid & back office services.
Joining Tom,s marketing team are Sheri Thomas, Frank Davis, Andrea Crump,
Jeff Harbert and Fred Philipson.

The EnronOnline Product Control function, currently reporting to Sheri
Thomas, will fold into EnronOnline Operations.  Savita Puthigai will lead the
combined group, which will have responsibility for all non-IT day-to-day
operations.  Sheri will move to the mid & back office commercialization
effort reporting to Tom Gros.  Jennifer Denny will assume Sheri,s
responsibilities as the lead for product control.

Amita Gosalia, director of EnronOnline Europe Support, has accepted a new
position with EBS in London.  With her departure, Lara Fields will assume
responsibility for the EnronOnline support team in Europe and report to
Savita.  Paul Goddard will continue to lead our marketing efforts in Europe
and report directly to Andy Zipper, who will continue to lead all of
EnronOnline,s activities.  Angela Connelly will continue to manage
EnronOnline,s content in Europe and report to Kal Shah.  Additionally, John
Pavetto, John Cummings, John Allario, Mike Haney and Jake Staffel will join
Andy,s team to focus on origination opportunities around the EnronOnline
application.

Rex Shelby and David Berberian will focus on special initiatives and new
business opportunities.  Brandon Wax will manage ENW,s investment portfolio.
Mark S. Palmer will lead the Transaction Development and Structuring team.
In their new roles, Rex, Brandon and Mark will report to the ENW Office of
the Chair.

Please join us in congratulating everyone on their new responsibilities and
thank you for your continued support as we position ENW for the future.


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
08:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           02/09/2001 08:38 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: URG: Gas Securitization Agreements

FYI - SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------

"Jauregui, Robert M" <RMJ4@pge.com> on 02/08/2001 07:55:44 PM
To: "'taylorja2@bp.com'" <taylorja2@bp.com>, "'mcclankg@bp.com'"
<mcclankg@bp.com>, "'sdba@dynegy.com'" <sdba@dynegy.com>, "'njwa@dynegy.com'"
<njwa@dynegy.com>, "'pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com'"  <pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com>,
"'chuck.watson@dynegy.com'"  <chuck.watson@dynegy.com>,
"'pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'repling@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <repling@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'mmce@dynegy.com'" <mmce@dynegy.com>, "'swbe@dynegy.com'" <swbe@dynegy.com>,
"'bcli@dynegy.com'"  <bcli@dynegy.com>, "'singleton.greg@epenergy.com'"
<singleton.greg@epenergy.com>, "'hoferc@epenergy.com'"
<hoferc@epenergy.com>, "'smithc@epenergy.com'" <smithc@epenergy.com>,
"'WiseW@epenergy.com'" <WiseW@epenergy.com>, "'jonesg@epenergy.com'"
<jonesg@epenergy.com>, "'colliw@texaco.com'" <colliw@texaco.com>,
"'benewm@texaco.com'" <benewm@texaco.com>, "'underga@texaco.com'"
<underga@texaco.com>, "'hans@cook-inlet.com'" <hans@cook-inlet.com>,
"'prez@cook-inlet.com'" <prez@cook-inlet.com>, "'davidyi@cook-inlet.com'"
<davidyi@cook-inlet.com>, "'dronn@mayerbrown.com'"  <dronn@mayerbrown.com>,
"'swidner@coral-energy.com'"  <swidner@coral-energy.com>,
"'blong@coral-energy.com'"  <blong@coral-energy.com>,
"'ctise@coral-energy.com'"  <ctise@coral-energy.com>,
"'jeff.skilling@enron.com'"  <jeff.skilling@enron.com>,
"'william.s.bradford@enron.com'"  <william.s.bradford@enron.com>,
"'travis.mccullough@enron.com'"  <travis.mccullough@enron.com>,
"'ICCEnergy@aol.com'" <ICCEnergy@aol.com>, "'stefkatz@cs.com'"
<stefkatz@cs.com>, "'msessa@sempratrading.com'"  <msessa@sempratrading.com>,
"'dfelsinger@sempra.com'"  <dfelsinger@sempra.com>, "'mcosta@stroock.com'"
<mcosta@stroock.com>, "'jshorter@txuenergy.com'" <jshorter@txuenergy.com>,
"'mperkins2@txuelectric.com'" <mperkins2@txuelectric.com>,
"'cenochs@txuenergy.com'" <cenochs@txuenergy.com>,
"'bjeffrie@westerngas.com'" <bjeffrie@westerngas.com>,
"'ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca'" <ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca>, "'richarddaniel@aec.ca'"
<richarddaniel@aec.ca>, "'jones.murphy@williams.com'"
<jones.murphy@williams.com>, "'randall.o'neal@williams.com'"
<randall.o'neal@williams.com>, "'kelly.knowlton@williams.com'"
<kelly.knowlton@williams.com>, "'connie.turner@williams.com'"
<connie.turner@williams.com>, "'scampbell@txuenergy.com'"
<scampbell@txuenergy.com>, "'ilydiatt@altra.com'" <ilydiatt@altra.com>,
"'dkohler@br-inc.com'" <dkohler@br-inc.com>, "'Reason@br-inc.com'"
<Reason@br-inc.com>, "'sallen@duke-energy.com'" <sallen@duke-energy.com>,
"'rsbaker@duke-energy.com'" <rsbaker@duke-energy.com>,
"'richard.ruzika@gs.com'" <richard.ruzika@gs.com>,
"'steve.brown@southernenergy.com'" <steve.brown@southernenergy.com>,
"'kenny.foo@ngx.com'" <kenny.foo@ngx.com>, "'tgary@pcenergy.com'"
<tgary@pcenergy.com>, "'bredd@pcenergy.com'" <bredd@pcenergy.com>,
"'harry_wijsman@pcp.ca'" <harry_wijsman@pcp.ca>, "'celias@pcenergy.com'"
<celias@pcenergy.com>, "'Hal-Borlan@reliantenergy.Com'"
<Hal-Borlan@reliantenergy.Com>, "'priscilla-massey@reliantenergy.com'"
<priscilla-massey@reliantenergy.Com>, "'llittle@reliantenergy.com'"
<llittle@reliantenergy.Com>, "'gary-lamb@transcanada.com'"
<gary-lamb@transcanada.com>, "'larry-desmeules@coastenergy.com'"
<larry-desmeules@coastenergy.com>, "'five5wood@aol.com'"
<five5wood@aol.com>, "'don.fishbeck@cmenergy.com'"
<don.fishbeck@cmenergy.com>, "'randy.harrison@southernenergy.com'"
<randy.harrison@southernenergy.com>, "'john.krill@engageenergy.com'"
<john.krill@engageenergy.com>, "'glen.mackey@energy.com'"
<glen.mackey@energy.com>, "'doug.rabey@energy.com'"  <doug.rabey@energy.com>,
"'michael_huse@transcanada.com'"  <michael_huse@transcanada.com>
cc: "'jlopes@hrice.com'" <jlopes@hrice.com>, "'jnexon@hrice.com'"
<jnexon@hrice.com>, "Buchsbaum, Craig M (Corp)"
<craig.buchsbaum@pge-corp.com>, "Whelan, Steve (Corp)"
<steve.whelan@pge-corp.com>, "Lee, Fanny" <FSL1@pge.com>, "Berkovitz, Trista"
<TxB6@pge.com>, "Clare, David" <DWC3@pge.com>, "Woo, Shirley A (Law)"
<SAW0@pge.com>, "McLafferty, Daniel"  <MDM8@pge.com>, "Cotroneo, Eileen"
<EFM2@pge.com>, "'dmao@orrick.com'"  <dmao@orrick.com>, "Litteneker, Randall
(Law)" <RJL9@pge.com>, "Gee, Dennis" <DLG3@pge.com>, "Welch, Ray"
<RXWc@pge.com>

Subject: URG:  Gas Securitization Agreements

I am pleased to report that, as 2/8/01, 4:00pm PST, PG&E has executed the
gas supplier security agreement and the intercreditor agreement with the
following suppliers:

* BP Energy Company
* Dynegy Canada Marketing & Trade, A Division of DCI
* Dynegy Marketing & Trade
* El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
* Texaco Canada
* Texaco Natural Gas
* TXU Energy Trading Canada Limited
* TXU Energy Trading Company
* Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Co. (US & Canada)

As you know, other suppliers are not precluded from future participation (we
highly encourage it) however, we will now require completion of Exhibit B
(Supplier Joinder Agreement) as outlined in 8.(j).  I would greatly
appreciate your replying to this email to let us know whether you intend to
be a party to these agreements at this time.

Please call if you have any questions.

Please forward all correspondence to:

Trista Berkovitz
Director, Gas Procurement
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
77 Beale Street, Room 553
San Francisco, CA  94105-1814
415. 973.2152 (bus)
415.973.9213 (fax)

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:  THIS E-MAIL IS  MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT
OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW.  IF YOU
RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION,
OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  PLEASE NOTIFY US
IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE
FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.


I would like to talk to you about this at your convenience.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grace Jr., James
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	Tweed, Sheila
Subject:	Comparewrite to follow

Please call when you have had a chance to look at these.


Stan-
If there is anything I can do or get Mike to do in order to pull his team
together then please let me know.   I am open to any suggestions or concerns
you may have.

Mike has expressed an interest in me becoming a leader in developing the
culture and morale (Manager, Employee & Community Relations) of EOTT.  I feel
I can do an extremely good job at this....and could even do a better job if I
had the help and support of Enron.  Please let me know your thoughts on
this....I feel that being engaged more with Enron will show a significant
difference at EOTT.  I think it is real important for EOTT Employees to feel
like we are part of Enron....
(as you know, being a part of such a highly respected company adds quite a
bit of value....as well as pride!)

Some ideas:
 1.  Tapping into Enron's training and development
 2.  Benefits
 3.  Employee Recognition Programs
 4.  Overall ideas Enron has that will assist in team building
 5.  Mentoring Programs

I just want you to know that I am willing to take on whatever task you would
like to hand to me....I am also very interested in finding out how EOTT can
benefit from Enron....anyone that you feel I should contact at Enron...please
let me know!

I am ready to help make EOTT a wonderful and HAPPY place to work.....(maybe
even a name change wouldn't be such a bad idea....)

Thanks for listening!
Shelly


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyde, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:49 PM
To:	Smith, Matt; Piazze, Tara; Blackburn, Nate; O'Malley, Justin; Rank, Sabina; Gaskill, Chris
Cc:	Tonks, Colin; Dronet, David; Wang, Yan
Subject:	Manual Entry

I have the Manual Entry process ready for testing again (testing as in testing by the analysts).  I would prefer to have it used by the analysts at least for a few days to iron out any more potential "bugs" before releasing it to users on the floor.  If the consensus is to have people on the floor be the testers, that is fine as well, as long as they know that the following URL points to a development server.

Without further ado, the link to the Manual Entry Page:

http://fundamentals.dev.corp.enron.com/admin/manualentry/

As stated in the above URL, this is located on the DEVELOPMENT web server.  Users should honestly never be directed to this URL, unless authorized by one of the site developers, since anything on it is subject to be currently in development (read: potentially broken).

Anyway, here are some things that have been added to the Manual Entry piece in this release:

"Previous" data now reflects information in the DB for the latest effective date for the selected cycle (not just "Yesterday" as before)...
There is now an option to enter data for a "special cycle 0"...this is to be used on occasions where no data was scraped (for whatever reason), but there is some available that can be manually entered.  Selecting this option causes ALL points for a given pipeline to be displayed (both normally scraped points AND manually entered points).  A cycle of '0' is applied to this data, and it should only show up on reports until valid scrape data becomes available (since the report engine is designed to pull the latest cycle available).
You can now add "extra" line items to be stored in the DB...this is to be used when you must enter data for more than one flow type for a given point (i.e. the point is reported as both a Receipt and a Delivery).  This should normally only have to be done the first time data is entered for that pipe, since the "Previous" data will handle pulling in and displaying (the next time) every flow type stored for every point on the pipe.

NOTE:  It is set to only allow 1 extra point to be added...this was done to simplify the handling of this feature; I'm open to discussion if you feel there is a need to enter more than one extra point (I see it as a Receipt/Delivery issue...will a point ever be more than that?  Receipt/Delivery/Storage or something?)

I have also fixed the "Exceptions Occurred" bug that cropped up recently...this was caused by moving the manually entered points to their own unique pipeline ids.  The Jaguar system did not get updated to account for that, but it is updated now.

Aside from the above, minor tweaks here and there have also been made.  I am going to enlist the aid of Junellen to "beautify" the layout, but provided no more bugs appear during testing this should be good to go into production by the beginning of next week.

Any questions, feel free to ask or reply.

Thanks,
Chris


Jane:

Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the
"governing law" issue was raised.  I do not have any memoranda addressing
which choice of law would be binding on Enron Japan Corp.  However, I note
that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by Enron Japan
Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated 9/21/00).  Are either
Texas or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement?

Thanks for your assistance.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


You are most welcome even though you are too much of a tight wade to buy my
capacity.

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hallmark cards you'll NEVER see!

There were pretty good.  Thanks, I needed that!  md


- MJUN0800.doc


Hi, Vince,

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Please see attached brief descriptions of SPVs, to my knowledge, there are a
couple more and I will keep you posted.

Best Regards,

Li


This is the amendment offered per the House Commerce Committee's request in
order to allow  "a more sufficient state role."  This was drafted per
sign-off from our conference call with Steve Kean, Joe Hartsoe and Dan
Watkiss yesterday plus drafted with the buy-in from numerous attorneys
representing various stakeholders with NARUC being the essential
participant.  The staff and stakeholders meet again early Monday morning to
determine if this agreement is sufficient to meet the needs of Congressman
Barton so we can proceed to mark-up.  If this proves the case, we will need
to immediately also lobby the other provisions which need amendment, but have
been held at bay until the transmission language loggerhead we created is
removed.  The plan would be to determine on Monday the "go" vs. "no go" to
full Commerce Committee mark-up.  With an affirmative decision, the mark-up
would proceed at round-the-clock, record pace with conclusion completed by
Thursday, July 27th.  We will continue to advise you of the status.

As an aside, with Congressman Largent comparing this effort to a "Hail Mary"
pass; he said this with optimism.  And for you football fans, with the
Congressman having been one of the best receivers in the country; our odds
are better than they would have been otherwise.  Perhaps this is like
numerous state efforts before which were pronounced "dead" but resurrected
for enactment at the final hour.

With the comprehensive bill activity, the stand-alone reliability bill
viability will not be considered until September, if at all.  This bill's
Savings Clause "new" agreement failure also makes bill movement problematic
as does the agreement we achieved from all the Stakeholders to share our
position to block its movement.  We have drafted a letter to the Speaker
which is waiting in the wings (to be singed by numerous groups) should it
become necessary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
11:28 AM ---------------------------

Cynthia Sandherr
07/21/2000 11:15 AM

To: curry.hagerty@mail.house.gov, cathy.vanway@mail.house.gov,
miriam.erickson@mail.house.gov, joe.kelliher@mail.house.gov,
andy.black@mail.house.gov, mike.willis@mail.house.gov,
bob.bolster@mail.house.gov
cc:

Subject: Commerce Staff Proposal/Bliley Certification Replacement and
Technical Corrections

Here's the amendment the group of attorneys in the room drafted after
yesterday's meeting and discussion.  They have all signed-off on it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
11:19 AM ---------------------------

"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> on 07/21/2000 11:10:19 AM
To: <csandhe@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Bliley Certification Replacement and Technical Corrections

is attached.  I got an E-Mail from Chuck Gray last night in which Chuck told
me that NARUC still prefers Barton over Largent, but that he does not oppose
this amendment in itself.
 - 0127103.01


I assume that this is in lieu of the meeting we had scheduled for tomorrow
afternoon?  Just want to make sure...

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 11:55
AM ---------------------------

John.Normand@enron.com@enron.com on 08/23/2000 11:47:29 AM
Sent by: Arlene.Chapman@enron.com
To: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Bob.Greene@enron.com,
Dennis.Alexander@enron.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com,
Mark.Dobler@enron.com, Ross.Newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

  (superscript: New meeting request from John Normand)

                08/24/2000 12:30 PM Local Time
                08/24/2000 02:00 PM Local Time

  Title:        Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served
  (J.Normand, M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene,
  D.Alexander, B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))
  Location:     -No room information available-

  Chair:        John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

  To (required):   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
  cc (optional):

     John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT wants you to attend a meeting.

On        08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT
For       1 hour 30 minutes
With:          John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Chairperson)
          Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          Kay Mann/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Mark Dobler/NA/Enron (Invited)
          Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)

   Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served (J.Normand,
M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene, D.Alexander,
B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))


Energy Market Report
Friday, December 28, 2001

*See attached pdf file.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
December 28, 2001 for January 1, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low     Change**   High    Change**
NW/N. Rockies*    21.00      NA       24.00     NA
Mid-Columbia*     21.00      NA       24.00     NA
COB*              21.00      NA       24.00     NA
N. California*    21.50      NA       25.00     NA
Midway/Sylmar*      NA       NA         NA      NA
S. California*    20.50      NA       24.50     NA
Mead*             20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Palo Verde*       18.00      NA       22.00     NA
Inland SW*        18.00      NA       24.25     NA
4-Corners*        20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Central Rockies*  18.00      NA       23.00     NA
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low     Change**   High    Change**
NW/N. Rockies*    21.00      NA       24.00     NA
Mid-Columbia*     21.00      NA       24.00     NA
COB*              21.00      NA       24.00     NA
N. California*    21.50      NA       25.00     NA
Midway/Sylmar*      NA       NA         NA      NA
S. California*    20.50      NA       24.50     NA
Mead*             20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Palo Verde*       18.00      NA       22.00     NA
Inland SW*        18.00      NA       24.25     NA
4-Corners*        20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Central Rockies*  18.00      NA       23.00     NA

*Denotes trading of flat, 24-hour products.
**"NA" changes are not applicable because prices for on and off peak goods
are not comparable to flat products.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
December 28, 2001 for January 2, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low     Change**   High    Change**
NW/N. Rockies     23.50      NA       27.00     NA
Mid-Columbia      23.50      NA       27.00     NA
COB               25.00      NA       27.50     NA
N. California     26.75      NA       30.25     NA
Midway/Sylmar       NA       NA         NA      NA
S. California     26.75      NA       30.75     NA
Mead              27.00      NA       30.00     NA
Palo Verde        26.00      NA       29.25     NA
Inland SW         26.00      NA       30.00     NA
4-Corners         27.00      NA       28.00     NA
Central Rockies   23.75      NA       24.25     NA
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low     Change**   High    Change**
NW/N. Rockies     21.00      NA       24.00     NA
Mid-Columbia      21.00      NA       24.00     NA
COB               21.00      NA       24.00     NA
N. California     21.50      NA       25.00     NA
Midway/Sylmar       NA       NA         NA      NA
S. California     20.50      NA       24.50     NA
Mead              20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Palo Verde        18.00      NA       22.00     NA
Inland SW         18.00      NA       24.25     NA
4-Corners         20.00      NA       24.25     NA
Central Rockies   18.00      NA       23.00     NA

**"NA" changes are not applicable because prices for on and off peak goods
are not comparable to flat products.
__________________________________________________________
Enron "Stock" (Certificates) Soars

As power contracts moved into the New Year, marketers across the WSCC saw
prices firm up, if only marginally.  "We're still looking at some pretty
mild weather forecasts, and precipitation and flows are still healthy,"
noted one Northwest player.  Enron once again graced the wire agencies on
Friday, as always garnering dubious honors.  Collectors can now buy Enron
stock certificates for up to $99 on eBay.  That is almost $9 more than the
actual stock sold for on its best day!  Evidently, Enron's historic demise
has placed its stock in the same Hall of Fame as stock certificates from
Czarist Russia and from now-nonexistent countries, and is a sought-after
commodity by collectors and enthusiasts.  Meanwhile, abundant natural gas
supplies have kept a lid on NYMEX Henry Hub futures prices.  The February
contract, trading for its first day in the front-month position, gained 15.5
cents over the day's trading, erasing half of Thursday's loss, to close at
2.774$/mmBtu.  March followed hot on February's heels, rising 11.6 cents to
settle at 2.746$/mmBtu.

Peak power costs in the Northwest showed some strength in the new month on
news of a large outage in the eastern reaches of the region, the five-day
uncertainty, and forecasts for colder weather in the near future.
Mid-Columbia peak goods traded from 23.5 to 27$/MWh, a gain of 3.75$/MWh on
the high end and .75$/MWh on the low.  Temperatures across the region ranged
from firmly below freezing to the low 50s on Friday, but the five-day
forecast called for colder weather on both sides of the Cascade Range
through January 1.  The latest six-to-ten predicted Northwest temperatures
to stick just below normal from January 3 to 7.  Forecasted flows at Chief
Joseph remained healthy, but were revised slightly downward to 75 kcfs
Saturday, 60 kcfs Sunday, 90 kcfs Monday, 55 kcfs Tuesday, 95 kcfs Wednesday
and Thursday, and 90 kcfs next Friday.  There was no news of unit outages in
the Pacific Northwest on Friday, but East of the Rockies, in Montana, news
that PPL Montana's Colstrip #4 (740 MW) had tripped off line late Thursday
washed over the WSCC market.  Both the cause and the ETR were kept close to
the chest.

Despite softer gas prices on key pipelines in the West, day-ahead
electricity prices strengthened in the Golden State on Friday, with the
inclusion of the first working day of 2002 in the two-day package boosting
load forecasts.  As two unit outages affected the SP15 grid, heavy load
prices climbed almost 4$/MWh, trading between 26.75 and 30.75$/MWh.  Light
load goods changed hands between 20.5 and 24.5$/MWh.  Spot gas at the
Southern California border settled 9 cents lower on Friday from 2.43 to
2.48$/mmBtu.  In hydro happenings, the DWR reported that data for last week
shows the California snow pack already standing at 55% of expected April 1
levels.  If the current precipitation trends continue the snow pack will be
at 120% of the average, a welcome sign for all those watching generation at
the northern hydros.  In unit news, gas-fired Ormond Beach #1 (725 MW) was
off-line on Friday for planned maintenance, while Alamitos #6 (480 MW) also
tripped, but for unplanned reasons.  The five-day forecast continued to show
little change, as temperatures were expected to remain within 5 degrees of
normal through Tuesday.  Los Angeles forecasts called for highs in the
mid-60s Monday and Tuesday, while mid-state load centers were expected to be
about 10 degrees cooler.  The most current six-to-ten predicted above-normal
temperatures from January 3 to 7.

With cold weather firmly entrenched across the Southwest and forecasts
calling for greater cooling and even snow, peak power at Palo Verde firmed
up about 3.25$/MWh on the high end for the first peak day of the New Year.
Peak goods traded from 26 to 29.25$/MWh on Friday, up from the 25 to 26$/MWh
seen on Thursday.  "Sure it's kind of cold," admitted one seller, "but
unless we get some big unit outages or a gas spike, we're not going to see
much strength in the market any time soon."  There were no unit outages to
report in the Southwest on Friday.  Daytime highs in the north were on the
low side of freezing and expected to stay that way into next year, while
temperatures in the south ranged from the high 30s to mid-60s, and were
forecast to cool off as the New Year approaches.  The latest six-to-ten
called for below-normal temperatures to grip the region from January 3 to 7.

David Ramberg and Jessie Norris
_________________________________________________________

Western Generating Unit Outages

Current                            Begins          Ends          Reason
CAISO units <250/6495 total          NA             NA
planned/unplanned*
Alamitos #3/320/gas               04-Dec-01         ?            planned
Alamitos #4/320/gas               23-Dec-01         ?            planned
Alamitos #6/480/gas               28-Dec-01         ?            unplanned*
Big Creek Project/1020/hydro      09-Dec-01         ?         @752MW,
planned
Colstrip #4/740/coal              27-Dec-01         ?            unplanned*
El Segundo #3/337/gas             02-Oct-01         ?            unplanned
Etiwanda #3/320/gas               22-Dec-01         ?            planned
Etiwanda #4/320/gas               22-Dec-01         ?            planned
Grand Coulee #19/600/hydro        10-Dec-01       March          repairs
Helms PGP #2/407/hydro            01-Oct-01         ?            planned
Hyatt/Thermalito/933/hydro        02-Oct-01         ?      @607 MW,
unplanned
Los Medanos/550/gas               25-Dec-01         ?      @125 MW,
unplanned
Morro Bay #4/336/gas              22-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #1/725/gas           28-Dec-01         ?            planned*
Ormond Beach #2/750/gas           05-Oct-01         ?      @350 MW,
unplanned
Pittsburg #6/317/gas              22-Nov-01         ?            planned
Sutter Plants/546/gas             04-Dec-01         ?            planned

For unit owners refer to pdf version.
*Indicates a change from previous EMR.
______________________________________________________________________

Eastern Markets Pre-Scheduled Firm Power Prices ($/MWh)

December 28, 2001 for January 2, 2002

Peak (Heavy) in $/MWh
                 Low     Change   High      Change
Into Cinergy    21.75     3.75    25.00      5.25
Western PJM     24.50     0.75    27.00      3.00
Into Entergy    23.50     2.00    25.00      2.00
Into TVA        19.90     1.40    20.10      0.85
___________________________________________________________
With light demand for New Year's Eve expected to lead into the middle of the
new week and colder temperatures on the horizon, peak power for Monday
delivery edged down across the Eastern Interconnect in lackluster end of the
week trading.  Wednesday goods gained ground as higher load forecasts pushed
early prices up.  "We usually do 1500 MW of PJM dailies at least, but this
short week between the holidays we've been lucky to do 100 MW each day.
There just doesn't seem to be an active market out there," commented one
Mid-Atlantic trader, adding that he was heading home early, a sentiment
echoed by many in the East on Friday.  To the relief of many gas watchers,
NYMEX Henry Hub futures rebounded somewhat on Friday.  February climbed 15.5
cents to close at 2.774$/mmBtu, while March gained 11.6 cents to end at
2.746$/mmBtu.

Colder weather forecasts in the new week were balanced by light load
expectations ahead of the holiday, which sent heavy load electricity prices
down in the Mid-Atlantic on Friday.  "Trading was choppy today.  I'd buy a
piece, and the offer would disappear before I could pick up another,"
commented one PJM dealer.  Western PJM goods for Monday delivery changed
hands between 23.75 and 24$/MWh, while early deals for Wednesday delivery
were heard between 24.5 and 27$/MWh.  Traders thought the market for
Wednesday would probably firm up on Monday.  "Balance for next week looks
promising.  It's all that cold weather," said one market player.  The
Jan/Feb contract saw action between 30.1 and 30.5$/MWh on Friday.  After
jumping to 33$/MWh twice in the early afternoon, LMPs averaged 19.28$/MWh
through 15:00 EST.  Temperatures for the early part of the new week were
expected to be nice and cold, with overnight lows in the 20 to 23 degree
range.  The latest six-to-ten called for below-normal temperatures from
January 3 to 7.

Spot electricity prices traded down for another day in the Midwest on
Friday, despite an anticipated drop in the mercury for the new week.  Into
Cinergy deals for Monday were seen between 18 and 19.75$/MWh, losing another
buck off the low end and almost two off the high.  The Wednesday picture
looked a little better, trading between 21.75 and 25$/MWh.  Strangely the
winter contract also lost ground on Friday, with transactions heard as low
as 24.4$/MWh.  Cold weather was expected to settle over the Midwest with a
vengeance, with highs for Monday and Tuesday expected in the 17 to 25 degree
range and lows in the frigid single digits.  The most current six-to-ten
predicted below-normal temperatures from January 3 to 7.

Amid very slow trading and colder temperatures expected in the new week,
peak power prices were flat to lower in the Southeast on Friday.  Into
Entergy pieces for Monday delivery were bought and sold from 21.5 to
23$/MWh, with the bulk of deals heard around 21.5 to 22$/MWh.  Wednesday
deals were tentatively heard between 23.5 and 25$/MWh.  Into TVA
transactions for New Year's Eve went through from 18.5 to 19.25$/MWh, while
Wednesday saw action slightly higher from 19.9 to 20.1$/MWh.  Overnight lows
were expected in the mid-20s by Monday, with highs in the low-40s.  The
latest six-to-ten called for below-normal temperatures from January 3 to 7.
___________________________________________________________
California ISO Congestion Index in $/MWh

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 29-Dec-01         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

OTC Forward Peak Electricity Contracts in $/MWh

                    Mid-C              PV              SP-15
                Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask
BOM              --       --       --       --       --       --
February       22.00    23.50    26.00    27.00    27.00    28.00
March          19.00    20.50    25.50    26.50    26.50    27.50
April          17.50    19.00    24.00    25.00    25.00    26.00
Q2 '02         17.00    18.50    28.00    29.00    28.00    29.00
Q3 '02         33.50    35.50    44.00    45.00    42.50    43.50
Q4 '02         28.50    30.00    28.75    29.75    31.00    32.00
Cal '03        30.75    32.25    34.00    35.00    35.00    36.00

Represents the most recent bid/ask spread obtainable
by the Energy Market Report.

Alberta Power Pool Index (C$/MWh)

                    Peak(14)   Peak(16)   Off-Peak    Flat     Change
for  27-Dec-01       46.26      45.03      22.00      38.02     17.04

BPA's Offer for 1/03/02.

Hours        Amount          NW delivered        COB/NOB delivered

7-22         100MW           Market Price*          Market Price*

*Market price will be determined at time of request.

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures in $/mmBtu

                 Close        Change
        Feb      2.774         0.155
        Mar      2.746         0.116

Natural Gas Spot Prices in $/mmBtu

                  Low          High
Sumas             2.32         2.37
So. Cal Border    2.43         2.48
San Juan          2.30         2.35
__________________________________________________________

Economic Insight, Inc. - 3004 SW First, Portland, Oregon 97201,
Telephone (503) 222-2425, Internet e-mail emr@econ.com -
Copyright, Economic Insight, Inc. 2001.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 12:11
PM ---------------------------

"Leitman, Jerry" <jleitman@fce.com> on 11/03/2000 05:30:42 PM
To: "Heather Kroll (E-mail)" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>, "Ozzie Pagan
(E-mail)" <opagan@enron.com>
cc: "Jacqueline Scheib (E-mail)" <jscheib@rc.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>, "Scott Healy (E-mail)" <scott.healy@enron.com>,
"Mahler, Joseph" <jmahler@fce.com>, "Leo, Tony" <tleo@fce.com>, "Levine,
Ross" <rlevine@fce.com>, "Bentley, Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>

Subject: Agreement Documents

Heather and Ozzie
We just concluded a review of the agreement documents and noted all changes,
corrections, etc. to make it in compliance with discussions last Tuesday
which resolved all/most of the business issues.
 Jackie Scheib has committed to red line the agreement that was sent to us
last night, to be in accordance with our internal review this afternoon, and
to get it out sometime over the weekend to FCE and to Enron.  At the same
time we are trying to finalize the attachments (exhibits) for early next
week.
I suggest we each review the red line on Monday and set up conf call late
Monday or Tues am to resolve any outstanding business issues or
"wordsmithing", so we can try to get this behind us.

Jerry Leitman
jleitman@fce.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 08:15 AM -----

	Joseph Alamo
	02/14/2001 11:50 AM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to
energy alarm"

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 09:48
AM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	02/13/2001 04:57 PM

To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Sac Bee, Tues 2/13 Editorial: "Lawmakers failed to respond to energy
alarm"

Lawmakers failed to respond to energy alarm

(Published Feb. 13, 2001)

Now that state lawmakers have begun an inquiry to determine what caused
California's energy crisis, they might want to take a look in the mirror.
Not at the infamous 1996 vote that triggered the partial deregulation of the
electricity industry. The remains of that law have been picked over enough.
Besides, most of the people who voted for it have already left the
Legislature, thanks to term limits.
But there was another vote last June, far less heralded and still little
known. It came just as warning bells were starting to signal the onset of
what has since become a crippling crisis. The Legislature not only ignored
those alarms, it stood in the way of the people who were trying to respond.
Why it did so remains something of a mystery. How it did so says a lot about
the way the Legislature works.
At issue was the now-defunct California Power Exchange. This was a
state-mandated auction, until recently the only place that utilities were
allowed to shop for the electricity that lights our homes and businesses. By
last June there were ominous signs that the power exchange, known as the PX,
wasn't working right. Prices were higher than anyone expected. The supply of
energy seemed thinner than was reasonable. There were enormous overhead
costs.
The power exchange was a bit like having a single automobile auction where
everyone who wanted to buy or sell a car had to do business. In times of
surplus this might work, because the sellers would underbid each other to
unload their cars to reluctant buyers. But in a shortage, the opposite would
be true. Buyers, with no place else to go, would pay ever-higher prices to
get what they needed. That's what was happening with electricity.
A majority of the Public Utilities Commission decided to do something about
it. The PUC voted 3-2 to allow privately formed exchanges to compete with the
state-sanctioned auction. At least two private exchanges were promising to
deliver more power at lower prices with fewer administrative costs. The
commission wanted to let them give it a try.
But before the PUC could even implement the change, the Legislature
intervened. Acting with unusual speed, lawmakers overturned the commission's
decision.
Assembly Bill 2866 was a classic legislative bill, in the worst sense. A
cobbled-together collection of 28 unrelated items, it was drafted in a hurry
as a companion to the new state budget. One of the bill's many parts was a
provision to subsidize California's film industry. That got a lot of
attention. The paragraph overturning the PUC's attempt to head off the energy
crisis got next to none. The bill was amended in the Senate on June 15 and
approved later that day. The Assembly passed it the next day, and Gov. Gray
Davis signed it.
The analysis of the bill that members saw in the Assembly was cryptic and
misleading. It said the bill would authorize the PUC to study the idea of
allowing competition for the state-mandated exchange. That was true as far as
it went. But the analysis omitted the fact that the bill's real intent was
just the opposite: to reverse a PUC decision and prohibit competing exchanges
for at least a year.
"California had made a big investment in the power exchange," said Sen. Jim
Brulte, R-Rancho Cucamonga, who was one of probably just a handful of
legislators who knew about the provision before it became law. "The PUC
decision would have put that investment at risk." Which is another way of
saying that the power exchange wasn't working and had to be protected from
competition.
Richard Bilas, the PUC commissioner who was pushing the hardest for the
reform the Legislature overturned, said he never liked the idea of mandating
a single exchange in which the utilities would have to buy all their power.
Bilas wasn't a member of the commission when the PUC restructured
California's electricity industry. But he said the result reminded him of the
former Soviet Union, where leaders declared that they were going to move to a
market economy and then appointed a group of central planners to figure out
how those markets should function.
"Markets are not based on fictitious or created exchanges," he said. "Markets
are based on buyers and sellers coming face to face to negotiate a deal. You
don't establish beforehand something that may not be necessary."
It's still not clear whether opening up the markets would have prevented the
price spikes that have since nearly bankrupted the utilities, forcing the
state to step in and buy electricity to keep the lights on. It might be a
stretch to suggest that any single policy change could have prevented the
crisis. But we will never know.
The Legislature, acting in haste and with little information, kept us from
finding out. The California Power Exchange, which the Legislature was so
eager to protect from competition, collapsed of its own weight anyway, and is
now out of business.
The law preventing other exchanges from entering the market was quietly
repealed two weeks ago, seven very long months after it was adopted.


Has eric gonzales been invited.  I would like him to be

Shirley Crenshaw
01/11/2001 09:18 AM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Meetings with Petronas on February 8th

Good morning all:

The Petronas meetings and presentations will be in EB3321 on the 8th.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
09:11 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/08/2001 12:06 PM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meeting on Feb 8, 2001

FYI.

This is the list of the Petronas executives visiting Enron on Feb 8.
I have invited them to lunch. Would you like to join me for lunch.

I would like to propose a short courtesy meeting at 10  with Jeff/John (5 -
10 minutes),
followed by RAC/Research presentation till 11:30.

Vince

P.S. I shall reserve a conference room for this meeting

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------

azminab@petronas.com.my on 01/07/2001 06:37:33 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Shirley.crenshaw@enron.com,
KhairuddinBMJaafar@petronas.com.my
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting on Feb 8, 2001

Dear Kaminski

4 members from Corporate Risk Management Unit

1. Iqbal Abdullah   - General Manager
2. Nur Azmin Abu Bakar   - Head, Risk Assessment & Controls
3. Zulkifli A Rahim - Head, Risk Measurement & Systems
4. Adnan Adams - Head, Special Projects

Regards

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com on 03/01/2001 09:45:02 PM

To:   azminab@petronas.com.my
cc:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Subject:  Re: Meeting on Feb 8, 2001

Dear Mr. Nur Azmin Abu Bakar,

Thanks for your prompt reply.

Please, let us know how many members of your team will
visit Enron.

I look forward to our meeting on February 8.

Vince Kaminski

azminab@petronas.com.my on 01/02/2001 06:38:33 PM

To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, KhairuddinBMJaafar@petronas.com.my,
      Shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: Meeting on Feb 8, 2001

Dear Kaminski,

  Happy New year and thank you for the reply.  We are honored to have
lunch with you and your team however we have another appointment at
2.30p.m.

Regards

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com on 03/01/2001 07:38:19 AM

To:   azminab@petronas.com.my
cc:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Subject:  Meeting on Feb 8, 2001

Dear Sir,

I would like to apologize for the delay in responding to your fax.
I was on vacation for the last few days.

I shall be honored to meet your delegation on Thursday, February 8 at 10:00
a.m.
Please, let me know if you will be free for lunch after the meeting.

Vince Kaminski


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/15/2001>, published as of 10/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Please disregard previous.

Thanks,

ML


I will attend

DG


Hey Suz,

I'm off to walk my dog.  I'm doing some stuff for Gregg Penman this am, but
it isn't too bad.  Paige will be home in time to go to lunch, and Michael
wants her to come visit his school.

Hope all is quiet.  Is Dan OK?

Ciao,

Kay


$0 bid for skip hicks


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 4, 2001 5:00pm through May 7, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:       ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  EBS
Time:  Fri 5/4/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at  10:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/4/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/4/2001 at    8:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/5/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/5/2001 at  4:00:00 AM London
Outage:  CGMP removal on MSFCs (EBS)
Environments Impacted:  EBS
Purpose: Possible fix for multicast problems. Neal Symms is still reporting
difficulties with multicast and Tibco.
Backout: Place 'ip cgmp' back on the interfaces
Contact(s):  Dennis McGough    713-345-3143

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


As mentioned in yesterday's email, please find attached Project Summer's
Matrix.


Thanks for the joke, it provided me with a well needed chuckle (You and
Darren definitely have too much time on your hands).  As for the hat/casual
western theme, we are going to have to go to make a trip to Blanco's or Tin
Hall sometime so I can don the full regalia.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	01/18/2001 06:40 PM

		 To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal
Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carmen Ayala/Enron@enronXgate, Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Hillier/Enron@enronXgate, Paul
Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ASAP-Preliminary List of Online Contracts

Attached is what I hope is a pretty complete list of the EnronOnline
contracts I have been made aware of.  There are a few I have open questions
about  or am waiting to receive copies of the contract.  Can each of you
please take a look and think about whether there are any others we may be
missing.  Again, my time frame is short here, so if I can get your response
promptly I would be most appreciative.


Start Date: 1/29/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012901.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field
!!!General SQL error.
The field is too small to accept the amount of data you attempted to add.  Try inserting or pasting less data.
Field


Please see attached Resolutions for use in this afternoon's board meeting at
2:00 pm.  Thank you.

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 <<RESOLUTIONS 9-12-01 Mtg.doc>>

 - RESOLUTIONS 9-12-01 Mtg.doc


Any first class upgrades available?

VIKKI ANAYA <vanaya_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 06/01/2001 04:45:30 PM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject:

                                          AGENT VA/VA BOOKING REF
YZEY2A

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN KAY MANN X 57566

  DATE:  JUN 01 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN HOUSTON TX     MEMPHIS TN     745A    930A
CO 4096    Y          MON   G.BUSH INTERCO MEMPHIS INTL
                            TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 11C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  04JUN MEMPHIS TN     HOUSTON TX     555P    740P
CO 3841    Y          MON   MEMPHIS INTL   G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL B
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:45 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER EMB 145
                            SEAT 12C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MANN/C KAY

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/JR33G1

MANN/C KAY                               TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7029446540

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 02:21 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
05/01/2001 10:20 AM
To:	Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	US Power Outlook 2001

FYI!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 10:19 AM ---------------------------

"Lin, Hongyan" <Hongyan.Lin@wefa.com> on 04/25/2001 08:15:44 AM
To:	Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc:	"McNabb, Peter" <Peter.McNabb@wefa.com>
Subject:	US Power Outlook 2001

 <<US Power Outlook 2001.pdf>>  <<US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix B.pdf>>
<<US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix C.pdf>>  <<US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix
D.pdf>>  <<US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix E.pdf>>  <<US Power Outlook 2001-
Appendix F.pdf>>  <<US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix G.pdf>>

 - US Power Outlook 2001.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix B.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix C.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix D.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix E.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix F.pdf
 - US Power Outlook 2001- Appendix G.pdf


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 09:40 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           01/25/2001 09:36 AM

To: Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Spencer Vosko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Fuller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Danaher/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Rathmell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Offshore crude

Tom Byargeon, Kevin Miller and Ken Loch in ENA are working with producers in
the US involved in deep water offshore Louisiana/Texas oil and gas drilling
projects. This financing activity was primarily started to help ENA secure
long term well head and pipeline natural gas supplies to supplement the gas
trading desk activities. Just like what happened in Enron's initial VPP
program they are find more interest in oil drilling projects rather than
natural gas projects.

They are currently working on a bid (due 1/31) for the Medusa project which
involves Murphy (operator), Agip and Callon in Mississippi Canyon Blocks #538
and #582. The initial reservoir reports estimate reserves of 80-120 million
barrels of sour crude and they estimate initial production to be 40,000 bpd
starting in 1Q 2003. Quality is estimated to be a Mars type crude with 25-27
API Gravity and 1.5-2.0% sulfur. Plans are to build a private pipeline to
Equilon's West Delta #143 platform and then bring the oil onshore. Peggy is
finding out where WD #143 pumps to onshore.

Tom's group would like to know if we have any interesting in buying the crude
on either a fixed or floating basis. The floating could be tied to a Platt's
index or the NYMEX. It is far too early to expect Murphy to enter into a
physical or financial contract, but Tom hopes to get us first and/or last
look from Murphy when the time is right. Another alternative is to give
Murphy barrels at their 95,000 bpd Meraux, Louisiana refinery in exchange for
the new production barrels.

Could someone in your group please give me a notional non binding basis
differential for this quality of crude for Cal 2003?


Thanks Reyna for  retroing this gas back between ANR and TCO.  It saved us
over $7800 in LDC penalties......THANKSSSSS

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           02/02/2000 08:25 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reyna Cabrera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monclova

for 2/1 a cut 782dth from Monclova (f4) to Sjersey Resources the penalty for
this is about $10.00 per dth.
Just Fyi

thank
joann