<TITLE>Gas Indices - IntercontentalExchange</TITLE>

IntercontinentalExchange

Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin

For Natural Gas Delivered on Thursday, December  27, 2001

(Trade Date of Wednesday, December  26, 2001)

Click here to access index history.

* volume represents sell-side only *

 Region
    Hub	High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (mmBtu)

Hub Name

LOUISIANA

    <NOBR>ANR SE	          $2.9050	          $2.7800	          $2.8811	+    .3423	         194,500	American Natural Resources Pipleline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool

    <NOBR>Columbia Onshore	          $2.9700	          $2.7800	          $2.9246	+    .3548	         242,500	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool

    <NOBR>Henry Hub	          $3.0050	          $2.8300	          $2.9557	+    .3286	         992,300	Henry Hub - Tailgate, Louisiana

    <NOBR>NGPL LA	          $2.9050	          $2.7200	          $2.8569	+    .3246	         254,400	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 500L	          $2.9300	          $2.7600	          $2.8976	+    .3635	         183,600	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone L, 500 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 800L	          $2.9300	          $2.8600	          $2.8991	+    .3542	         186,200	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone L, 800 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>TETCO ELA	          $2.9400	          $2.8600	          $2.9136	+    .3724	          90,900	Texas Eastern - East LA

    <NOBR>TETCO WLA	          $2.9350	          $2.8150	          $2.8832	+    .3852	          52,700	Texas Eastern - West LA

    <NOBR>Transco 65	          $3.0300	          $2.8650	          $2.9680	+    .3266	         217,900	Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. - Station 65

    <NOBR>Trunkline ELA	          $2.9000	          $2.6650	          $2.8738	+    .3666	          88,900	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>TxGas SL	          $2.9900	          $2.8200	          $2.9424	+    .3569	         412,200	Texas Gas Transmission Corp. - Zone SL FT Pool

MIDCONTINENT

    <NOBR>MichCon, citygate	          $3.1000	          $2.9400	          $3.0674	+    .4199	         347,600	Michigan Consolidated Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL Midcont	          $2.9000	          $2.6800	          $2.7875	+    .3261	         239,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Mid-Continent Pool

    <NOBR>NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $3.0700	          $2.9000	          $2.9848	+    .5482	         893,800	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Nicor Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $3.0675	          $2.9100	          $2.9849	+    .4484	         150,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Nipsco Citygate

    <NOBR>NNG Demarcation	          $3.1000	          $2.7825	          $2.9151	+    .4039	         198,500	Northern Natural Gas - Demarcation Pool

NORTHEAST

    <NOBR>Columbia TCO	          $3.2200	          $3.0200	          $3.0959	+    .3846	         411,900	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool (Appalachia)

    <NOBR>Dominion So.Point	          $3.3000	          $3.0300	          $3.1437	+    .4472	         231,400	Dominion - South Point

    <NOBR>TETCO M3	          $3.7000	          $3.5000	          $3.6528	+    .6687	         211,100	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone

    <NOBR>Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.9000	          $3.7000	          $3.8114	+    .7849	         117,200	Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)

WEST

    <NOBR>El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.8200	          $2.6800	          $2.7197	+    .3208	          51,700	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool (non-Bondad)

    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.6200	          $2.5000	          $2.5532	+    .0532	          31,000	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.

    <NOBR>Opal	          $2.8400	          $2.5500	          $2.6772	+    .3655	         149,200	Opal Plant Tailgate

    <NOBR>PG&E Citygate	          $3.1200	          $2.9400	          $2.9822	+    .2471	         149,500	PG&E - Citygate

    SoCal Border	          $2.9500	          $2.7000	          $2.8274	+    .2876	         135,000	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)

WEST TEXAS

    <NOBR>El Paso - Keystone	          $2.8200	          $2.7000	          $2.7446	+    .3075	         208,300	El Paso - Keystone Pool

    <NOBR>Waha	          $2.8800	          $2.6800	          $2.7907	+    .3018	         270,700	Waha Hub - West Texas

Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.

©Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Weekly Priority Mtg./Raetta

Date:		3/8/2001
Time:		9:30 AM - 10:30 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


<title>Energy Exchanges Online Europe: Energy Trading in the New Economy</title>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

This email is also available at: http://www.eyeforenergy.com/energyemail/

          EVENT INFORMATION

          CO-LOCATED

            EVENTS

          SPONSORS

          MEDIA

            SPONSORS

        Effective Trading and Risk Strategies for

        the Online Energy Market

Now in its 3rd year, this is THE conference where the European Energy

        industry talks about the business of energy trading. Case studies from

        traders, brokers, online exchanges and energy companies to help you stay

        at the forefront of the exploding energy trading market!

          UBS Warburg estimates that profits

            from European power trading alone will top $2.4 billion in 2002.

          Add natural gas and oil and you're

            looking at a huge pot of pure profit, only available to those companies

            that know how to best take advantage of the rise of deregulation and

            online trading in the European market.

Speakers at this event will include:

          Dynegy,

            Altra Energy, OM Group, Powergen, Bergen-Energie, Amsterdam

            Power Exchange, RWE Trading, ENDESA, Utility Exchange,

            El Paso, SchlumbergerSema, TXU, and more...

Recent efforts at deregulating the energy market in the European Union,

        combined with the rise of online energy exchanges, is set to make the

        next few months one of the most challenging and opportunity-filled period

        the energy sector has seen. And with the American energy companies getting

        involved in the European energy trading scene, it is set to become a whole

        new ball game.

Do you know where you stand?

DEREGULATION? Hear about the latest developments in European

              energy deregulation and what opportunities they open up for your

              company.

RISK MANAGEMENT? Multiple commodities, counter-party, delivery

              logistics, multiple platforms... the risks are almost endless. Learn

              the latest strategies that will help you navigate through the online

              trading minefield.

LIQUIDITY AND TRUST? Where can you find the energy products

              you need, and who can you trust to deliver them?

SOFTWARE AND SECURITY? As more and more trading is done

              online, do you have the right software systems in place and are

              you sure they're secure?

PRICE DISCOVERY? How to make sure you're making the best

              trades whether you're trading on one exchange or many.

PLUS... a full networking programme to help you meet and

              do business with the people who can make a difference to your future.

    (c) Eyeforenergy 2002

      All enquiries regarding this email should be sent to events@eyeforenergy.com


I'm already schedule for another meeting from 1-2:30 on Thurs.  I am open
after that.

D

Laura Harder@ENRON
08/07/2000 02:26 PM
To: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A
Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting - Transport Pools for EOL

Please plan to attend a meeting regarding Transport Pools for EOL on
Thursday, August 10th from 1:00 - 2:00 in EB32c2.

If you have any questions or conflicts please call Laura Harder.

Thanks,
Laura
Ext 3-1994


Would you please send us EPSA's proposed answers to Hoecker's questions?


Sounds like you are on the team.   I am assuming you will start full-time on Monday.   Whalley has already assured me you will be part of this re-build process which obviously requires full-time focus.

Please confirm.


I'm not saying we should buy this service, but I do think we need some way of
staying on top of TV spots mentioning Enron.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 07:33 AM -----

	<FREETRIAL@ptvnews.net>
	03/05/2001 06:00 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FREETRIAL - Enron Corporation News Alert:
KEANSTEVEN_J_ENRON_COPORATIONS 1 new stories.

News Alert
Each business day, Power Television will send to you by email a listing of
the news your company has made from television stations across the United
States. Over 100 local media markets and 20 networks will be monitored by our
service at NO COST to you.
Each headline will allow you to link to a text transcript of the news story.
If the story is of significant interest, a video clip can be ordered online
as well.
As a way to introduce our innovative new service, you will be able to view
text transcripts for free. After a week,s trial, the news notifications will
be delivered to you at no cost but if you would like to view actual text
transcripts of news stories there is a nominal $9 per view cost. VHS tapes
can be ordered for $95 plus shipping. Our goal is to provide an online
alternative to the costly traditional television monitoring and clipping
services.

The following stories have been posted to your KEANSTEVEN_J_ENRON_COPORATIONS
account for the Enron Corporation search: 2001-03-03 23:04:16 NBC San
Francisco/Oakland/San Jose, CA
BONUSES TO THEIR CHIEF EXECUTIVES. ENRON OF TEXAS AND DUKE ENERGY
205.252.166.40/user/view_notify.asp?id=3311601641

Power Television offers a daily news notification service free of charge.
Costs are only incurred when viewing text transcripts, ordering VHS tapes or
when a link is forwarded and a new user who views a transcript.

Please alter my news alert

Please add an email addresses to this news alert

Please remove me from your free service

If you have any questions, please call 1.888.628.9191 or inquire online at
www.ptvnews.net
Disclaimer: Material supplied may be used for internal review, analysis or
research only. Any editing, reproduction, publication, rebroadcast, public
showing or public display is forbidden and prohibited by copyright laws.


David:
Here is a draft of the letter to Constellation
Carol


Stinson,

Let's chat about it.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
10:36 AM ---------------------------
From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 02:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW:

What are your thoughts regarding this?

Frank


Dear Mr.. Lavorato,

The $1500 that you sent to us in October, has not been credited to our
account.If those funds were sent through AM TRADE INTERNATIONAL, you need to
have your bank send an amendment message stating that the respective funds
are intended for final credit to World Sports Exchange/ ACCT # 12307915.

Most likely, those funds are sitting at the Antigua Overseas Bank.

2. Another suggestion would be to call back those funds since the
beneficiary is not in receipt of payment, and resend it through the new
instruction as per our website.This method is guaranteed more efficient.

For any further questions, please call the accounts department at WSEX.

REGARDS
MARIA.
Accounts Manager
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


I need Linda Guinn To have VP authority to approve invoices as outlined below.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 09:42 AM -----

	Linda R Guinn 05/21/2001 10:52 AM 	   To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: sap delegation

Per our conversation, SAP needs an approval delegation from you so that I can approve your invoices at the VP level.

Please forward this email to SAP security for processing.

Thanks,
Linda Guinn
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6104
(713) 646-3393 (fax)


Parcel 8867 has been allocated as follows:

Bid number 3850 has been awarded to Canadian Natural Resources Limited for capacity release parcel 8867.

Releasing Shipper: Enron North America Corp.
Path: Kingsgate to Malin
Begin Date: 12/4/2001
End Date: 11/1/2002
Amount Awarded: 15000
Bid Amount: 100.0
Price Denomination: Percent Of Max Tariff Rate

System Award Message: Auto-Allocated in full to pre-arranged shipper

Bid number 3850 was awarded under new contract number 08170.

-------------------------------------------------

For additional information, contact our services and contracting department at (503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Bryan,

The person from Citibank:

Alla Gil, (212) 723 6275
alla.gil@ssmb.com

I am attaching the  resume of Iris Mack.

Vince


I think we ought to discuss the Order with Columbia Gulf.  Its possible we are ok.  The problem FERC seems to have is that under the negotiated contract it is impossible for anyone but Columbia and the Shipper to know what the rate is at the time of the transaction.  Columbia's deal contains a default rate (based on index differentials) applicable if the parties are unable to agree on a basis price used to determine the "Negotiated Daily Reservation Charge".   To avoid the application of the default rate, the "Negotiated Daily Reservation Charge" requires Columbia and the shipper to negotiate, and agree,  to a basis number on a daily basis.  The parties did not specify particular index's for the purpose of calculating basis.  Thus, under Columbia's deal only the default rate can be determined at the time of the transaction.  In contrast, Transwestern's deals appear to be similar to Columbia's default rate; i.e., a rate based upon index's where the index's are agreed upon and stated upfront.  Thanks.  Greg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:35 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lokey, Teb; Neubauer, Dave; Miller, Kent; Fossum, Drew; Pavlou, Maria; Kirk, Steve; Porter, Gregory J.; Hartsoe, Joe; Kilmer III, Robert; Williams, Jo
Subject:	Columbia Gulf order on negotiated rates

I received a copy of an order issued by the FERc on Columbia negotiated rate transaction, which includes a formula ie indexed rate.  They accepted the negotiated rate deal but they are requiring  them to file in their tariff within ONE DAY after the rate has been determined the contract and actual rate. ( Each time the actual rate changes during the term)   Just think about this for the upcoming TW_ USGT deal and NNG"- Reliant deals.    Notwithstanding the time to actually make the filing, the cost to serve it each day if the negotiated rate is different by day and then the service when an order is issued each day---  I believe this is FERC's way to attempt to eliminate negotiated rate indexed based deals-  they are punishing themselves as well, as each filing will require a notice etc-  so every day they could need to issue an order.

I feel we need to discuss with Columbia, INGAA and join in filing for rehearing on this administrative nightmare.  An alternative would be to require you to post on Internet website the day of the transaction the actual rate, so similarly situated customers would have access to the actual rate.  I'm sending you guys a copy of the order.


Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation,

in Tempe, AZ


Enclosed are those documents I believe would be impacted if we elect to use
separate Credit Support Annexes, one for the new EPMI ISDA and one for the
Power Master (already in existence ("Old CSA")).

 1. New Credit Support Annex - to be attached to EPMI/ML ISDA ("New CSA").
Draft enclosed, including one marked to show changes from CSA currently in
place between ENA and ML.

 2. Schedule to ISDA - Part 4(F) would reflect New CSA rather than Old CSA.
Revised Schedule attached.

 3. No Amendment to Power Agreement would be required.  (Delete document
named "Power Amendment 1).

          (black-line version)


300 pm cdt works for me.


Alert!
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due.  It is critical that you login to iPayit and take immediate action to resolve this invoice.

Remember, you play an important role in ensuring that we pay our vendors on time.

Tip!:  You must login to the system to forward this invoice to another user.

To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
http://iPayit.enron.com
Note:  Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.

First time iPayit user?  For training materials, click on the link below:
http://isc.enron.com/site/doclibrary/user/default.asp

Need help?
North America: ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
Europe: European Accounts Payable at +44-20-7783-7520.
Asia-Pacific: Sydney Accounts Payable at +61-2-9229-2336


Tony, the idea we had discussed at our meeting with Drew was somehow
acquiring capacity on El Paso in order to access the South Needles
interconnect with SoCal.  Currently SoCal lets El Paso deliver to S. Needles
but does not extend the same privilege to TW.

I'm unsure how it would work.  TW does have a couple of interconnects with El
Paso's system.  I would simply say in the memo that one solution to the
constraint at Topock might be to get some shippers to switch to South
Needles, and deliver gas to South Needles after twisting SoCal's arm and
letting us in, or somehow acquiring capacity on El Paso (or otherwise using
their system) to access South Needles.  Obviously we will need to flesh this
out from an economic, regulatory and legal standpoint.  I will discuss it
with Jeff when he returns.  My apologies for the delay.  Call if you have any
questions or comments to discuss!

S.


Can you approve the bom+1 product for HSC-Hehub?

Thanks,

Eric


Mark/Janel/Steve

Attached is the executive summary from the second California
statewide survey.  Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  execsummary.PDF
     Date:  4 Apr 2001, 11:07
     Size:  26747 bytes.
     Type:  Unknown

 - execsummary.PDF


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE

Thank you for the written advice. Obviously prospects of success assessed at "[no] more than 50%..." (ie. definitely less than 50%) is depressing, given initial expectations. We now need to maximise our bargaining power for acquisition of the smelter through the litigation which McCook have forced on us.

We look forward to receiving the draft Defence and Counterclaim for comments/approval. We will need this fairly urgently, since the 20 day period for service expires next Monday, 17 Sept 2001 (according to my calculations - please confirm). Can you please ensure that they are sent to all the copy parties on the email (now including Houston litigation dept). Thank you.

Paul Johnson
Enron legal dept

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Craig A. [mailto:cwoods@mayerbrown.com]
Sent: 06 September 2001 16:58
To: Groves, Robert; Heffron, Kevin; T Paul Johnson (Legal); McKey, Christopher; Michaud, Jean; Nissan, Limor
Cc: Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; McCombs, Hugh R.; Montz, Alex P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Forrester, J. Paul ; Durkin, Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Longview

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

All:  Attached is our follow-up memorandum regarding the merits of Enron's claim to enforce the Tolling Agreement against Longview.  Please feel free to contact either Rick or me if you have any questions.

Craig A. Woods
Mayer, Brown & Platt
190 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 701-8536 ph.
(312) 706-8697 fax
cwoods@mayerbrown.com

<<Merits_Memo.doc>>

***********************************************************************
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are
intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail reply and please delete this message from your computer.
Thank you. Mayer, Brown and Platt.


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 09/30/99 09:12
AM ---------------------------

Robert Quick
09/29/99 05:21 AM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: MT Pacific Valour - 3KT PX Daesan to Map Ta Phut

Matt, my thoughts on this which are based on general contractual principles
rather than admiralty matters of which I have no experience (admiralty is to
do with ships hitting each other I think).

a. yes. Clear breach of a condition.

b. I agree with your outside counsel that there is no basis that this clause
somehow overrides the right to terminate for breach of a condition. In my
view you would have to use express language to say that this general right is
excluded. No Court is going to say that all material breaches must have a
cure period - it makes no commercial /legal sense.

c. Affirmation is express must be clear and unambiguous. This conversation
without knowing much about the background does not seem very unreserved. This
is a matter of evidence. I take it there is no question of any implied
affirmation. Otherwise I agree with yr thoughts on this.

therefore I would not be hopeful of success in this one. tks

Matthias Lee
09/29/99 09:20 AM
To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: MT Pacific Valour - 3KT PX Daesan to Map Ta Phut

Robert

As spoken, I have been advising Russell Aeria here in Singapore on a
contentious matter.  Watson Farley & Williams ("WFW") have been retained as
external counsel. Because the issues are to be determined under English law
and your experience with admiralty matters, Alan has suggested that we seek
your counsel as well.

Below are the salient facts and issues. If you need and clarification or wish
to discuss, please call me  or let me know if we should schedule a time
tomorrow to speak again.

My numbers are : (65) 838 9103 (office); (65) 96919646 (mobile)

Facts:

1. ECTS purchased 3KT PX from Hyundai Singapore Pte Ltd ("Hyundai") FOB
Daesan, Korea; loading date range  14 - 20 Sept. ECTS sold the same 3KT PX to
Tuntex (Thailand) Public Company Limited ("Tuntex") CFR Map Ta Phut Thailand;
delivery date range 1 - 30 Sept.

2. ECTS chartered the Pacific Valour under asbatankvoy ETA Daesan 11/12 Sept,
Laycan 14 - 20 Sept.  The vessel was not able to meet ETA at Daesan
apparently because of delays at the preceding port in China The vessel
ultimately advised on 20 Sept ETA 22/pm, ie. 2 days beyond loading date
range.

3. ECTS failed to secure alternative tonnage primarily because of a typhoon
on 20 Sept. On 21 Sept, Hyundai terminated the agreemnet to supply the PX on
grounds that loading date range has expired. ECTS cancelled the charter on
the same day.

4. Alternative supply has been arranged for Tuntex. ECTS is considering
possible actions against Hyundai and the vessel owners.

5.  WFW has advised, subject to facts and evidence, ECTS has a reasonable
chance against the vessel owner for failing in their duty of reasonable
despatch to make the itinerary. We are comfortable with this opinion. WFW,
however, has opined that WCTS does not have a reasonable cause of action
against Hyundai, and it is in this regard we seek your comments.

Issues& advice:

a. Whether the loading date range is a condition of the contract with Hyundai
such that ECTS's failure to load within the date range was a breach entitling
Hyundai to rescind.

WFW advise that it is a condition as time in commercial contracts are of the
essence unless expressed otherwise.

b. If prima facie a condition, whether the definition of "Default" in the
confirmation (Enron's buyer form) with Hyundai under "DEFAULT, TERMINATION
AND LIQUIDATION", namely,  "...a material breach of this Agreement and fails
to cure such breach within ten (10) daysafter written notice..." implies into
a contract a cure period for material breaches.

WFW advise that there is no legal basis to argue that the clause overrides
Hyundai's right to terminate.

I attach the Hyundai confirmation for your easy reference:

c. Whether the taped conversation between Russel and Joseph Tan amounts to an
election to affirm the contract on the part of Hyundai such that they cannot
thereafter rely on ECTS's breach to terminate.

I was given the transcript yesterday and examined it closer today. It is
quite short and attached for your reference. The conversation took place on
20 Sept at about 9 am.

I have today asked WFW for their opinion on the same and expect them to
revert before the end of the day.

My view is that it is difficult to construe an election from the conversation
which amounts to Hyundai giving up their right to terminate. Even if it were
an election, I am of the view that it would be limited to an extension untill
21 Sept. In this regard, the vessel did not arrive until 22 Sept and we
advised Hyundai before they terminated on 21 Sept that ETA was 22/pm.  Please
let me have your comments notwithstanding.

If you wish to review WFW's opinions, please let me know and I'll fax them
across. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Many thanks

Matt


<http://www.skippingstone.com/images/ccblast/ccleft.bmp>  <http://www.skippingstone.com/images/ccblast/globe.bmp>	  <file:///C|/CCI/img/transdvp.gif>	 <http://www.capacitycenter.com>
The Source for Natural Gas Capacity Information and Exchange
You spend a lot of time researching prices for gas trades, but how much do you know about what's going on in pipeline capacity release contracts?

What are the going rates? What is your competition doing? Who has the transportation you need?  Will you be the first to know about the OFO that will effect your gas supply?

How can CapacityCenter.Com  <http://www.capacitycenter.com>help? You choose the pipelines, and we deliver information you need directly to your desktop - all day, every day.

Better awareness from system notices on pipelines

Capacity release offers that you can bid on

Summary of all the deals done - know who made the deals, where, how much and how long.

You get all the details

 Did you know that more capacity release deals were done on Transco than any of the other pipelines three years in a row?

Visit our website  <http://www.capacitycenter.com>

DOWNLOAD FREE REPORTS!  Learn who is doing all the deals and what pipelines they are being done one.

Complete a survey on Capacity Release trading and get entered to win a $100 AMEX Gift Check!

 And More?.

CapacityCenter.com <http://www.capacitycenter.com> has the only complete database of all the transaction information and other pipeline statistics available in the marketplace. Our New Market Report Center allows you to access information for any special projects you have.  Visit us and explore your options.

CapacityCenter.com <http://www.capacitycenter.com> has been delivering timely information to its customers for over two years. We have a new release that

Easier to Use
Has lower prices, and
Includes automated order processing

CapacityCenter.Com <http://www.capacitycenter.com>
The Source for Natural Gas Capacity Information and Exchange

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM OUR LIST PLEASE CLICK HERE <mailto:unsubscribe@skippingstone.com>


I like that.
PL


Is it really necessary to coordinate everything through ENW?  I am not sure
people will do that?  I think ENW should be informed but not be in control of
the registration.  Have the ENW people requested that they be in charge of
this process?  Will they care if we change it?

	Leslie Hansen
	12/12/2000 02:14 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Policy re Use of Third Party Trading Platforms

Mark:

I wanted to follow up to see if you have had an opportunity to consider the
proposed policy attached below.  Currently, the traders have no guidelines
governing their use of third party electronic trading platforms, and there
has been no centralized system for monitoring such use.

Please give me a call with any questions or comments.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 02:13 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	11/14/2000 01:09 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Policy re Use of Third Party Trading Platforms

Mark:

Mark Taylor and I have worked with Andy Zipper to develop a policy relating
to use of third party electronic trading platforms.  We propose that you and
Mark Frevert send the attached e-mail to all traders informing them of this
policy.  Note that I included a contact for questions at the bottom of the
policy.  I have listed myself for now.  We discussed sending this e-mail to
all Enron traders, including those in Europe and within other business units.

Mark Taylor, Andy Zipper and Sheri Thomas (the designated master user who
currently acts as Product Control Director for EnronOnline) have approved the
e-mail and the policy.

I look forward to your comments on the policy.  After you have approved the
e-mail and the policy, I will coordinate with Andy and Sheri to determine how
best to circulate the e-mail.

Leslie

**************************************************************************
Many of you have received offers to use third -party electronic trading
platforms like Dynegydirect.  Enron has a Policy Relating to Use of Third
Party Electronic Trading Platforms to serve as a guide to appropriate
registration for and use of such trading platforms.  The Policy provides that:

You must notify the Enron Net Works LLC (ENW) designee set out in the Policy
if you would like to trade on such a trading platform.
All registration and other documentation must be sent to the ENW designee,
who will coordinate the necessary legal and administrative review.
You are not authorized to use a third-party electronic trading platform until
you are authorized by ENW.
The Master User for all third-party electronic trading platform accounts will
be an ENW designee.
If you are currently using any third-party electronic trading platform,
please notify the ENW designee.

A full copy of the Policy Statement is attached for your review.


I'm not sure whether to feel sorry for you or not - can't wait to hear the
details  Yes, it was a fun weekend - we were in Austin.  T. swimming at the
Lake and I stayed around the hotel using the gym and getting a massage.  Good
food, too.  The only downer was the drive.


I just spoke with Hugh Connett of Bridgeline

Here's what happened:

1)  He wanted to make sure that we were OK with April minus 3 cents but he wanted to lock in the price on the March settlement date (Joe Parks suggests that we should lock in promptly after we get approval on the deal and not wait until the end of February - this probably works unless we can't get approval by the end of Feb.).  We should probably talk a bit more about this with Bridgeline;

2)  He is going to revise the term sheet and send it to us.  It will include (a) pad gas payment of $2.08MM and (b) B-Line to make Q4 2001 and Q1 2002 lease payments to Dow and pay any credits back to Enron (He needed to check on this but said that it sounded OK);

3)  He suggested that we should consider using $100k of the sales proceeds to fund the arbitration against TEPI (I asked him whether Bridgeline would be willing to fund the arbitration and he suggested this as an alternative); and

4)  We talked for a bit about the Storage/Transport Agreement - he said that they were willing to release the gas in storage to the extent that they are over-secured.  The big question is the value of the gas in storage.  I sought clarification on this because of our meeting this morning.  He said that he was going to figure out how much ENA owed under the Storage/Transport and then seek to convert that into an amount of gas.  Any gas in excess of that amount would be released.  In order to do this, however, he wants ENA to execute a document which makes it clear that by releasing the gas, Bridgeline is not waiving any rights that it might have to a warehouseman's lien on the gas in storage.  He is having their lawyer send a draft of this document to Gerald.

Stuart


Good morning!
Your December issue of CapstoneOnline awaits your review.

Read about:

- The new Health Sciences Library Dedication
- The Day Forum on Terrorism
- The $1.9M Grant from the Lilly Endowment Inc.
And much, much more!!

Click below to read this month's issue.

http://www.howard.edu/newsevents/Capstone/

LaWanza Spears
Publications Coordinator
Office of University Commmunications
Ph: 202-238-2334


[IMAGE] If you would like to be removed from our email list, please click or go to: http://www.questia.com/remove   and provide your email address.      Paper Topic: National Freedom Day - End of Slavery; Freedom Commemoration     What is one of the most obscure yet important holidays in the U.S.?   National Freedom Day, observed on February 1st, celebrates the end of slavery and commemorates freedom  and was established by Harry S. Truman via presidential proclamation.  With the start of a new semester,  and new paper assignments, why not write about the history of the American antislavery movement,  the abolitionists, and the history behind Truman's proclamation?  Read our suggested books on  these topics or do your own search  in the enormous Questia library.        What is the history of the American antislavery movement?  The Crusade against Slavery, 1830-1831   Written by Louis Filler   The Neglected Period of Anti-Slavery in America, 1808-1831   Written by Alice Dana Adams   Men and Brothers: Anglo-American Antislavery Cooperation   Written by Betty Fladeland    Who were the abolitionists?  Witness for Freedom: African American Voices on Race, Slavery, and Emancipation   Edited by C. Peter Ripley, Roy E. Finkenbine, Michael F. Hembree, & Donald Yacovone   The Antislavery Rank and File: A Social Profile of the Abolitionists' Constituency   Written by Edward Magdol   The Abolitionists: A Collection of Their Writing   Edited by Louis Ruchames    Questia helps you make the grade! Did you know that 8 out of 10 subscribers state they got a better grade  on their paper with Questia?  Or that 8 out of 10 subscribers state they created a better or higher quality  paper with Questia?  Whether you are a freshman or senior, get better grades on your papers, faster and easier  with Questia.  Making the grade has never been as easy! Subscribe  today and start enjoying success, too.   New semester, new home page!  If you haven't been to the Questia site recently, come visit! With the new  semester, we have a new home page that's even easier to use.   Check it out!    Wishing you sucess, The Questia Team     (c)2002 Questia Media America, Inc. Questia and the Questia logo are service marks of Questia Media and its affiliates.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 02:22
PM ---------------------------

Stuart Zisman
04/10/2000 01:11 PM
To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

At Healy's request attached is the latest AES LOI


we are going to be at the enron booth around 7 tonight?  are you guys still
going?


Where are the aggie headlines????  This is no big deal. A 20 year old gets drunk,some asshole cops treat them like shit and they mouth off to the asshole cops, who being the only ones able to excercise the power trip, get the last word.  Same thing happened to me in Lincoln and I was not a football player.  I had no sanctions and my charges were dropped.  He will miss the opener because he's a player.  When will espn give equal time to all of the other teams who have drunk 20 year olds getting into trouble.

How are you by the way?  I really miss having you around, especially this time of year.  OUT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 6:28 AM
To:	Platter, Phillip
Cc:	Day, Smith L.
Subject:	Conholios with Character

http://espn.go.com/ncfnews/2001//0819/1241589.html


(See attached file: HPLN0213.xls)

 - HPLN0213.xls


A couple of fyi items:

SoCal's balance was 151,133 mmbtus at 8/31/01.  Their balance is 300,521 mmbtus at 9/23/01.

We have received 33,130 mmbtus in payback from Williams through the 23rd which has decreased their balance to 242,260 mmbtus.

PG&E Topock's balance is 69,727 mmbtus due TW as of 9/23/01.

The index has decrease by about eighty cents during September which will cause a loss on volumetric oba's.


The producer lumber pricing sheet.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Jay
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Carter, Karen E.
Subject:	FW: Producers Newsletter 9-24-2001

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daigre, Sergai
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject:	Producers Newsletter 9-24-2001


Mark:

FYI re a legal roundtable in Washington DC re e-commerce issues relevant to
the energy industry.  (The Dynegy lawyer is extremely friendly and mentioned
this to me.)  Just thought I'd let you know in case you think we need an
Enron presence.  Renee mentions in her e-mail that someone from Enron is
supposed ot attend although she doesn't have a name.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 11:28 AM -----

	RHKI@dynegy.com
	10/19/2000 11:18 AM

		 To: leslie.hansen@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal e-Commerce Round Table

Here is the overview of the seminar we discussed.  I looked on my notes and
supposedly someone from Enron is attending, but I do not know that person's
name.  I will get back to you on the ETA within the next day or so.

RHK

Maureen Benjamin
Training Course Operations Manager
Phone: (312) 894-6342
Fax: (312)894-6358
www.marcusevans.com

 - course outline.pdf


where are you right now?  i am in london.  are you around?

From: Stu Staley/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 06/06/2001 08:13 AM GDT
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting next week

Greg:

I will be in Houston next Wed/Thu 13-14 Jun.  Any chance we could get
together to discuss life, Enron, and associated concepts?  Let me know what
times would suit.

Many thanks,

Stu


Sorry about the conference call this morning--- I neglected to get a call in number. I talked to Paul Simon, who had talked to Limor Nissan, and among the lawyers, we have no more comments. Paul was going to get together with the commercial team and see if they had any issues. Paul will contact you today with these changes/additions. If they are not substantive, I don't need to see them. Send Limor, Paul, and me a copy of the filed pleading. Thanks for your help.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Woods, Craig A." <cwoods@mayerbrown.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Woods+2C+20Craig+20A+2E+22+20+3Ccwoods+40mayerbrown+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	T Paul Johnson (Legal)
Cc:	Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; Montz, Alex P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Durkin, Thomas M.; Simons, Paul; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew; Nissan, Limor; McCombs, Hugh R.; Forrester, J. Paul
Subject:	RE: Longview

Paul:
We will get you a draft by the end of the day on Wednesday.  You are correct that our answer (or other pleading) is due on Monday, September 17.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Craig A. Woods
Mayer, Brown & Platt
190 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 701-8536 ph.
(312) 706-8697 fax
cwoods@mayerbrown.com
-----Original Message-----
From: T Paul Johnson (Legal) [mailto:t.paul.johnson@enron.com << File: mailto:t.paul.johnson@enron.com >> ]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:09 AM
To: Woods, Craig A.; Nissan, Limor; McCombs, Hugh R.; Forrester, J. Paul
Cc: Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; Montz, Alex
P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Durkin, Thomas M.; Simons, Paul; Evans, Mark
(London Legal); Sanders, Richard B.; Edison, Andrew
Subject: RE: Longview
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE

Thank you for the written advice. Obviously prospects of success
assessed at "[no] more than 50%..." (ie. definitely less than 50%) is
depressing, given initial expectations. We now need to maximise our
bargaining power for acquisition of the smelter through the litigation
which McCook have forced on us.

We look forward to receiving the draft Defence and Counterclaim for
comments/approval. We will need this fairly urgently, since the 20 day
period for service expires next Monday, 17 Sept 2001 (according to my
calculations - please confirm). Can you please ensure that they are sent
to all the copy parties on the email (now including Houston litigation
dept). Thank you.

Paul Johnson
Enron legal dept
-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Craig A. [mailto:cwoods@mayerbrown.com << File: mailto:cwoods@mayerbrown.com >> ]
Sent: 06 September 2001 16:58
To: Groves, Robert; Heffron, Kevin; T Paul Johnson (Legal); McKey,
Christopher; Michaud, Jean; Nissan, Limor
Cc: Raver, Carrie Marie ; Gamboa, Armando M.; Hahm, David ; McCombs,
Hugh R.; Montz, Alex P.; Stoll, J. Robert ; Forrester, J. Paul ; Durkin,
Thomas M.
Subject: RE: Longview
        PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
        All:  Attached is our follow-up memorandum regarding the merits
of Enron's claim to enforce the Tolling Agreement against Longview.
Please feel free to contact either Rick or me if you have any questions.

Craig A. Woods
Mayer, Brown & Platt
190 S. LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 701-8536 ph.
(312) 706-8697 fax
cwoods@mayerbrown.com
        <<Merits_Memo.doc>>
***********************************************************************
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are
intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally
privileged
and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the
intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution,
copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately
by e-mail reply and please delete this message from your computer.
Thank you. Mayer, Brown and Platt.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are
intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail reply and please delete this message from your computer.
Thank you.  Mayer, Brown and Platt.


Here is the file.  Thanks.
PL


Did you get this?  The address for you looks odd.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2000 10:22
AM ---------------------------

karla.hesketh@us.abb.com on 06/29/2000 02:12:27 PM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, kclark3@enron.com
cc: dennis.bowman@us.abb.com, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com,
michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com

Subject: Enron Corrected Option Letter Information for Contract Purposes
-LMSK-2001

---------------------- Forwarded by Karla Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on
06/29/2000 10:31 AM ---------------------------
Ben/Kay/Kathy,

Attached is the revised pricing for the 3 types of transformers for the
LMSK-2001 contract along with Schedule 1A, 1B and 1C reflecting the latest
transformer designs.  This information is for incorporation into the final
contract.

(See attached file: ABBoption6000may12rev5.doc)

Please call if you have any questions.  Mike will be at Enron tomorrow should
you need to discuss this final pricing and design information with him.

Regards,
Karla Hesketh

Karla Hesketh\ABB
Ph: 713-821-4016, Fx: 713-821-3526

 - ABBoption6000may12rev5.doc


Spoke to Allen - this outage will not take place this weekend and is tentatively rescheduled for the weekend of November 17.  The feasibility of that timing will be re-evaluated at the end of next week.  --Sally

-----Original Message-----
From: Piper, Greg
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2001 2:44 PM
To: Beck, Sally
Cc: Pickering, Mark
Subject: SAP

Webb called me and said he thought SAP was being taken down this weekend for maintenance or something?  Can you call Allen Sommer and ask?  Is this a good thing to do at this time considering we might need to use it?

Thanks.

Greg Piper
President & CEO

Enron Net Works LLC

  _____


David:

The new version looks good. I made 1 change. In Section 2.9, I added a phrase
that the Calendar will be posted on ERCOT MIS, so New Power will know where
to go to find any changes or updates to the schedule made by ERCOT. Paul
Radous is sending you a hard copy of the current Calendar to include as an
attachment and he expects to have the credit language to you before noon. I
am OK with the Confidentaility section. Let's just see what Anoush says.

Tom, Smith, Lloyd, Theresa, Jeff - please give us any comments you have. I
have to send this document to Anoush today. However, I will make it clear
that there may be additional comments.

Thanks,

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Portz, David
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:54 PM
To: Parks, Michelle; Radous, Paul; Curry, Mike
Cc: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: QSE Agreement with New Power

Attached is my preliminary mark-up of the draft sent by Mike Curry (5-2-01)
incorporating the various following e-mails of Michelle to the best of my
ability.  I ask that commercial persons rig up (or have someone else rig up
for them) the "Attachment X" referenced in Michelle's new Section 2.9
language.  Paul, I have reinstalled the Credit Support Annex in case you were
intending to use that apparatus to install credit terms (and I'm presuming
you are going to pull in an Enron Corp. guaranty, though I don't know your
intentions.)  Please respond to me ASAP with your best efforts to state the
final terms to be shown to
New Power, and I will refine the document into shape suitable to be sent
out.  Note -- I am uncertain how the confidentiality obligation in Section
7.2 should be stated in view of the possibly converging relations of ENA
Wholesale with EES, and therefore desire that it be stated as narrowly as can
be done while addressing New Power's main concerns and stating an EPMI
obligation with clear and livable boundaries.

 << File: NewPower QSE LSE Agr 5-9-01.doc >>
_______________________________________________

	Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate 05/07/2001 10:50 AM 	   To: Michelle
Parks/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: RE: QSE
Agreement with New Power

Michelle,

I do not see any problem whatever with this timeline.

Thanks.
Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Parks, Michelle
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Radous, Paul; Portz, David
Subject: QSE Agreement with New Power

David, Paul:

Do you think it will be possible to finish your mark-ups on the New Power
Agreement by Wednesday?

Thanks,

Michelle


This confirm is ready for execution.


Didn't know if you saw this...

Pompano refuses $10,000 `gift' from Texas firm that wants power-plant OK

By LISA J. HURIASH Sun-Sentinel??????
Web-posted: 11:43 p.m. Dec. 7, 2000

???POMPANO BEACH -- The city has returned a $10,000 check to a powerful
Texas-based company that wants to build a controversial power plant here.
???Enron North America, one of the world's largest energy conglomerates, has
proposed a 510-megawatt plant for a 30-acre site south of Sample Road and
east of Florida's Turnpike.
???Company officials hand-delivered the check last Friday, requesting that
the money be used for cultural arts programs. The city manager returned it on
Tuesday.
???"While your donation is believed to be a genuine and unrelated corporate
support of the community, the timing of your donation has the potential of
creating a false impression and perception of its intent and purpose," City
Manager C. William Hargett Jr. wrote in a letter to Steve Krimsky, director
of Enron.
???"Therefore, I am returning your check."
???The company is planning to pitch its development project to the city's
Planning and Zoning Board later this month. Eventually the issue will come
before the City Commission.
???The company hopes to start construction in April and begin operating the
plant on May 1, 2002. It would be the fifth power plant in Broward County,
and the third largest.
???City officials applauded returning the check to Enron.
???"I think their intentions were very questionable," said Commissioner Kay
McGinn. "The city did the honorable thing in returning the check."
???"We have been talking about cultural arts. But did they do it for
something in return?" asked Mayor Bill Griffin. "The best thing we did was to
return the check."
???There wasn't anything improper about the gift, said Eric Thode, spokesman
for Enron.
???"The city has a right to its opinion. I would say Enron nationwide has
been recognized for its philanthropic activities. We want to be a good
corporate citizen and support the community. These are not political
contributions. Supporting cultural activities, children's activities, these
are things we have typically supported in various areas where we do
business," he said.
???When the company built a plant in Illinois, for example, it also built a
playground in that city, Thode said.
???Two cities near the Pompano site, Margate and Coconut Creek, have
expressed concern about the plant and air-quality regulators, worry it would
rely too heavily on diesel fuel. Diesel fuel releases nitrogen oxide, a
leading cause of smog, which can worsen asthma, bronchitis and other
breathing problems.
???The plant would burn diesel fuel up to 1,500 hours a year, according to
its permit application to the state Department of Environmental Protection.
???Hargett said in his letter that he hopes when the plant controversy is
over, and the timing is better, Enron will come through financially.
???"Hopefully, Enron will continue its support of the community and consider
a future donation following completion of the various matters pending before
the city," he wrote in his letter to Krimsky.
???Thode noted that the check was not written to the city.
???"We would not cut a check directly to a city government," he said. "Our
budget has standards."
???The check was made payable to the non-profit Pompano Beach Cultural Arts
Foundation, which raises money for city-sponsored cultural programs. The five
city commissioners, who will vote on the power plant, act as the foundation's
directors.
???Enron officials met with Coconut Creek City Manager John Kelly and his
staff Thursday to discuss their concerns about the plant's impact. Because of
the area's wind conditions, the gases from the plant's 80-foot stacks would
blow in the general direction of Margate, Coconut Creek, Coral Springs and
Parkland.
???Kelly said it was a "good exchange of information" and he expects future
meetings.
???"They're trying to be the good neighbor and get into the community," Kelly
said, referring to the returned check. "It probably came off the wrong way."
???He added that he was relieved Pompano Beach returned the money.
???"It gives us all a comfort level we're going to deal with it objectively,"
he said. "Checks don't make the air better."
???Lisa J. Huriash can be reached at lhuriash@sun-sentinel.com or
954-356-4557.
???
???
?????


I would like to see your work as well.  I will give you a call.

Thanks
Hunter


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
07:05 AM ---------------------------

"Matt Lenhart" <mlenhart@houston.rr.com> on 04/10/2001 08:00:45 PM
To: <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

?
 - Hi C - Leave My Curl Alone.mp3


Thanks for the quick response!  So how do we get from today to being able to
capture desk to desk deals with all schedule changes?

Diana

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT
To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report

    Hi Diana & Kate,

    You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be
able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage,
    if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes
insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which
    Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things
like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month.

   Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation)
data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with
   Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule
data should be very much the same with all the changes
   in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and
liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and
   it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain
data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation
   the same data from 4/2/1996.

   Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule
between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule
   (liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid
confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format
   of the header for Region, nothing else.

   Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: Forward Obligation Report

Kroum,

I was running the new version of the Obligation Report.  I was not included
in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still
not doing what the "fix" was initiated for.  Originally, my discussions with
Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any
changes made in Deal Scheduling and  2.  All Desk to Desk deals.  Number
(2),   I believe was the difficult one.  When selecting the option on "Show
Deals"  in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate".
This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to
Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes.  Please
contact me for further discussion.  I apologize for not participating and
wasting your time.

Sincerely,

Diana Scholtes
(503) 464-3807

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question

Good afternoon, IT Wizards -

I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now
possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In
the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my
desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed
to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the
difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a
chance.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Congratulations on taking over the top spot!  And you said these guys would
be ok this year - your smoking crack again aren't you?  Looks like you guys
could be Final Four bound in the RCA Dome in Hoosier Land.  Good Luck
Ben


...that her husband can be so devious.

Here's hoping that you can join me in surprising Kim Watson for the 11th
anniversary of her 29th birthday.  Her birthday is actually on December
17th, but a key part of the deception is surprising her early.

We hope to see you on Friday, December 8, at The Spires, 2001 Holcombe
Blvd., Unit 2406 (77030).  If you need directions, you can call the front
desk at (713) 799-2501.  Desserts, wine, coffee and soft drinks will be
served.

The most current plan calls for folks to gather at our home between 7:30 and
8:00 p.m. on December 8.  Kim and I will be returning from our co-birthday
dinner (both of us are December kiddos), no earlier than 8:00 p.m. and will
proceed to unit 2406.  We'll come in and...(you know the rest...).

I need to have a rough head count of those who can make it, so please reply
to this e-mail by December 6 with your RSVP, or you can leave me a voice
mail at (281) 440-5300 x222.  Both are secure from Kim, so don't worry about
using either of these methods.  If you've already told me you can't make it,
you don't need to reply again.

Remember, no gifts, please.  Your presence will be gift enough.

Hope to see you on the 8th!

John Watson


I just heard back from Holli Krebs, who verified that Puget is right on this
deal - the term should be December through February. I've changed it in the
system.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           11/29/2000 08:26 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Puget Sound # 467090

When I tried to verbally confirm this deal, the counterparty has this deal
running for three months, December through February.  Could you check with
the trader and either change it or have him talk to the counterparty about
it.  Let me know.

Thanks!


IT'S REGISTRATION TIME!!
Ziff Energy Group
North American Gas Strategies Conference
November 5-7
Calgary
The Future of Western Canada's
Gas Supply: Stretched to the Limit?
Plus an additional one-day conference entitled
eSolutions: Next Generation Concepts for the E&P Sector
Join us for frank discussion about the future of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin.
Top gas industry leaders from across North America will address urgent concerns.
Is the WCSB becoming depleted similar to the prolific Gulf of Mexico Shelf?
Will increased drilling for deeper horizons lead to a new gas production spurt?
What is the current supply outlook? Hear answers to these questions and more.
Another stellar line-up ...
DAY 1 - Gas Industry Overview
Supply Update: Jack Golden, (President, BP Exploration & Production North America), Rod Erskine (President, E&P, El Paso Production), Greg Guidry, (Manager, Planning Portfolio Management & Strategy, Shell E&P), Senior U.S. government speaker
Markets: Joe Stepenovitch (VP Trading & Operations, Florida Power & Light), Edward T. Weber (Chairman, North American Electric Reliability Council), J. Doug Graham (President, ATCO Pipelines)
Gas Price Outlook: Don Albon (Senior VP, Aquila), Gary Morsches (Senior VP & CEO East, Mirant), Debbie Wernet (President, Coral Energy), Don Mulrain (GM, Commodity Marketing, Husky Oil)
DAY 2 - The Future of the Western Canada Basin
In-depth Look at Western Canadian Gas Supply: Ted Bogle (VP Exploration, Talisman), Nellie Cournoyea (Chair & CEO, Inuvialuit Regional Corporation), Graeme Phipps (VP Exploration & International, Petro-Canada), Terry Schmidtke (GM, Great Plains Business Unit, PanCanadian), Ken Sinclair (Chairman, Coalbed Methane Association), Ken Vollman (Chairman, NEB)
Executive Roundtable: Dave Boone (Executive VP & COO, PanCanadian), Jim Emme (VP, Exploration, Anadarko), Sig Cornelius (Treasurer, Conoco), Floyd Price (President, Apache Canada), Ernie Sapieha (President & CEO, Compton Petroleum), Bobby Shackouls (Chairman, President & CEO, Burlington Resources)
DAY 3
eSolutions: presentations, roundtable discussions, product demonstrations, workshops
Find out about:
Best practices in E&P eSolutions
The "next generation" E&P collaborative environment
Future capabilities of telecommunication in the energy industry

?
Attend only the core gas conference...
or... only the eSolutions conference.
Get maximum value by attending all three days.
Sponsored by:
Bloomberg
Duke Energy
Enbridge
SAP Canada
Schlumberger
ShawCor
TransCanada
Westcoast Energy
Media/Partners:
Calgary Herald
ECI/TheWebMarket
Energy Central
Oil & Gas Network
Pipeline & Gas Journal
For more information, see our website www.ziffenergyconferences.com,
phone 1-800-853-6252 or e-mail us at gasconference@ziffenergy.com


Folks:

I received these from Navigant today, but have not yet had an opportunity to
review them.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
Sent: Tue 6/5/2001 9:03 AM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Cc:
Subject: Draft Turbine Purchase Agreements

Ben:

Please give me a call when you receive these.  Thanks,

Michael

(See attached file: Sithe Hamilton Medway - Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC)
(See attached file: Sithe Hamilton Medway - Escrow Agreement.DOC)(See
attached file: Sithe Hamilton Medway - Assignment Agreement.DOC)

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)

 - Sithe Hamilton Medway - Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC <<Sithe Hamilton
Medway - Turbine Purchase Agreement.DOC>>
 - Sithe Hamilton Medway - Escrow Agreement.DOC <<Sithe Hamilton Medway -
Escrow Agreement.DOC>>
 - Sithe Hamilton Medway - Assignment Agreement.DOC <<Sithe Hamilton Medway -
Assignment Agreement.DOC>>


after work there is a eol happy hour at the state bar.  hull said we could
all go, so if you want in let me know.   i am heading there straight after
work.


Daren--

I know you're busy with bid week, so here are a couple questions & comments
for you:

September
I need to know if a ticket has been set up for September for the market side
of the Williams & Apache gas.  We still only the supply is in MOPS.  If it
just needs points added to it, just let me know the deal ticket #.

August 31st
This was the day we scheduled the payback to our two transport contracts on
Lonestar  1023 & 1460.  Currently, they do not have the supply points needed
for the Williams & Apache gas in order for the gas to be pathed to
imbalance...so I will get them added so this gas can be pathed.

July 31 - Aug 7
These days were pathed as buy/sells from Tenaska IV to Tenaska Marketing
Ventures.

I worked with volume management to get these out in time for payment (July &
Aug business), and had them do a manual entry for Aug 31st.

Please let me know what you think when you get a chance.

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001 08:44 AM
---------------------------

Pam Butler@ENRON
01/12/2001 03:41 PM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Ecoelectrica file

Rick, we are going to be running project payouts for Puerto Rico on Mark's
numbers ($317mm valuation) and Mary Joyce asked that you approve the
valuations due to the size of the project.  Can you please respond via email
so that I'll have documentation for my files.  Thanks.

Pam
---------------------- Forwarded by Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron on 01/12/2001
02:42 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Ruane@ECT on 01/10/2001 05:16 PM
To: Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: James C Lewis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
Subject: Ecoelectrica file

This is our summary model
If you have any questions please call me at 33569.
Thanks
Mark


AGA for 9/22/00 is 77


Dear Student,

Attached please find your lesson.  You can open the attached Lesson as
you would any other attachment by downloading the attached file to one
of your directories and then opening it in a browser. If you need
additional help in opening this attachment, please go to http://www.parlo.com/parlo21/help/faq/email_en.asp for more instructions.

If you would like to receive Parlo's Lessons in html, please go to the
'My Parlo' section of our website at http://www.parlo.com/parlo21/home/myparlo/myparlo_en.asp and change your
preference to an html formatted lesson in our subscription center.

Thanks and we hope you enjoy today's lesson.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

To view your lesson online:

Please click here

http://www.parlo.com/parlo21/emails/FREN/20011015/index.asp

or copy and paste the above url into your browser.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 - parlo.htm


- MACLEOD-.DOC
 - MACLEOD-.DOC


Harry, Please forward to anyone else who needs to see this.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 02:11 PM -----

	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	07/30/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Workshop on DWR Revenue Requirement --Please Forward to Applicabl e
Enron Individuals

The workshop conducted by the Energy Division on Friday on the DWR revenue
requirement submitted to the Commission on July  23rd was basically a
question and answer session. A representative of DWR was present as were
several representatives of the consulting firm Navigant which assisted DWR
in constructing its revenue requirement request.  The representatives of
Navigant fielded most of the questions.

Not much new information was garnered.  A little more clarity was shed on
certain areas. Of interest to Enron would be that in determining the net
short for each of the UDCs for which DWR was purchasing it assumed no change
in the current direct access levels (which is approximately 2% of the load
in the state) through 2002.

Other points of clarification included:

(1) A question exists with respect to whether DWR is responsible for the ISO
costs billed to the UDCs for the period of January through June of 2001.

(2) Any payments which were made to DWR to date by the UDCs would be netted
against the revenue requirements requests for the first and second quarter
of this year.  PG&E indicated that DWR's numbers for the revenue received
from PG&E to date do not match its own accounting.

(3) The net short calculation for each UDC was derived by using the net
short forecasts provided by each of the UDCs an modifying them to take into
account (1) a 4% reduction in load due to conservation efforts; (2) a 2%
reduction in load due to price elasticity increasing to 3% by January 2001;
(3) estimated impacts of the 20/20 program (assuming also a similar program
for next summer); (4) the impact of the UDCs curtailment programs.  Once
again, PG&E indicated its belief that DWR's net short projection for PG&E
was erroneous.

(4)  DWR explained that the basis for the projection that they would need
1.65 cents out of the three cents rate increase was that for sales made by
DWR they already receive the UDC generation rate (i.e., approximately 6.8
cent for PG&E and 7.2 cent for SCE).  On top of that, they need the 1.65
cents.

SCE submitted four pages of written questions to DWR on their revenue
request.  DWR is to respond in writing (and serve on all people on the
service list ) by Tuesday the 31st.  To the extent that the questions are
applicable to PG&E, they will answer the question with respect to both UDCs.

Please call if you have any questions.

Jeanne Bennett


I moved over the weekend to the Heights.  My new contact info. is

632 E. 12 1/2 Street
Houston, TX  77019

Tel:  713-869-6577

Cheers.


Call me when you have a second--713-853-5587

	showard@agsk.com
	01/05/2001 07:09 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Depositions of Our People

All parties have agreed to extend discovery cut off from 1/19 to 3/5/01, but
only for depositions of scheduled persons.  The "protected" list includes
Brian Barth, the person most knowledgable from ECT Securities, Julien Smythe,
and the person most knowledgable from Akin, Gump.  The list does not include
Kevin McConville.  I assume that ECT will designate Barth as PMK and that Akin
Gump will designate Smythe as PMK, so that we are talking about only two
depositions.

Trial dates and dispositive motion deadlines have not changed.

As a result of the the limited extension of discovery cutoff, plaintiffs want
to push Brian back to the week of January 29th or the week of February 5th.
They are also making noise about Brian's deposition possibly taking four days.
 We may want to take the position that Brian will be there for three days and
no more.  That will ruffle a lot of feathers, and you and I should discuss it.

Hennegan has asked if I will represent Akin Gump and, if so, will I accept
service.  You and I should discuss this also.  Either way, we need to alert
Akin Gump what is going on.

................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


To help focus our discussion, here is a sample clause (from the McDonald's
contract):

     "Taxes and Fees.  Allocation and Indemnity for Taxes.  Seller shall pay
all Taxes applicable to Energy prior to delivery to each Facility.  Buyer
shall pay all Taxes applicable to Energy at and after delivery . . . ,
including without limitation Taxes imposed on the purchase or sale of Energy,
on Buyer's possession, consumption, use or disposition of Energy, or on any
payment by Buyer to Seller hereunder.  "Taxes" means all taxes (except taxes
based on net income), fees, charges, surcharges or royalties, and any
interest and penalties thereon."

Please also consider the following variations:

     1.  What if clause does not include first sentence so that all "Taxes"
are allocated to Buyer?

     2.  What if the definition of "taxes" is defined as follows:

     "Taxes" means any and all new or existing governmental or
quasi-governmental taxes, assessments, levies, duties, fees, charges and
withholdings of any kind or nature whatsoever and howsoever described,
including . . . generation, . . . regulatory, . . . energy, consumption, . .
. ."

     3.  What if the definition also included "energy resource surcharges"?
(UC/CSU)

     4.  What if the definition also included "energy procurement charges"?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:42 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'; Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; 'jklauber@llgm.com'
Cc: Sunde, Marty; Cooley, Jan; Sharp, Vicki
Subject: Surcharges

Jan will be setting up a call today to discuss EES' ability to pass the "3
cent surcharge" through under its contracts.  Marty would like our advice on
this today, so I hope you are available.  Thanks.

P.S.  Vicki and Marty, please let Jan know if you wish to be included in the
call or just want the result.


Talked to Bill Reed.  In his comments, he will say:

FERC should be more prescriptive.  Can't wait for a new board, made of new
people, to act.  FERC needs to be more assertive--I told him we're all for
leadership from FERC.
They will strongly support the end of the buy-sell requirement and express
concern about the CPUC's micromanagement of utility purchases--I told him
we'd have a similar message on that issue.
FERC should "PJM" the California market--I told him we would differ
significantly on that issue, i.e., PJM-ing generaly, and "merging" the PX and
the ISO.
He said his comments on "refunds" would be "narrow" and would point out that
the FERC staff report says there is evidence of specific "bad actors" and
that those bad actors should be required to give refunds--I told him that our
position hasn't changed on retroactive ratemaking.
I explained our position on getting more information to the market sooner.
He said that it sounds like a good idea.
I told him about our message on price caps.  He said that he would stress
that price caps ought to be a temporary "fix," and should be removed just as
soon as the market is "functional."

Steve: I told him he should search you out prior to the start of the panel
tomorrow and talk more.

Best,
Jeff

Best,
Jeff


Add to Buyer's Closing Conditions:

 "Buyer shall have received notification from Management Company of the
written acceptance of employment offers made by Management Company from
Seller's employees identified by Enron Human Resources as "Management
Commercial" or "Commercial" employees.  This condition may be waived in whole
or in part by Buyer."

Is there a revised Organizational Chart?

Also please revise "August 21" to "August 23" in Exclusivity section of LOU.
While the Audit Committee meeting is still scheduled for August 21, one of
the members, Gerald Smith, is travelling and will be calling from the San
Francisco airport between flights.   Should this arrangement cause a problem
and somehow delay the meeting, we know that Smith will be back in Houston and
available Wednesday the 23rd.

We accept your proposed language on the definition of the I-80 corridor.

Paul Miller is going to discuss your proposed revisions to "Certain
Proprietary Rights" pertaining to projects within the Specified Geographical
Area with Mark.

With regard to transaction outside the Specified Geographical Area, we'd like
to clarify the point by adding the following sentence to the paragraph  "The
paragraph shall not be interpreted to prohibit or restrict Buyer, in any
manner, from pursuing or developing transactions outside the Specified
Geographical Area.

Paul also identified an area that needs to be addressed in the LOU involving
ENA's capacity on Fort Union and Lost Creek.  This is the agreement as
related to me by Paul:
 ENA grants NB the right to use all of ENA's available Fort Union capacity at
the rate of 14 cents from the Close until    December 31, 2001.
 NB agrees to take assignment of ENA's Fort Union and Lost Creek capacity on
January 1, 2002.

I'll give you a call to discuss the logistics of executing the LOU tomorrow.


Date: 	19-Dec-2001

Thank you for using register.com, your first step on the web
The following domain name(s) have been successfully registered:

ubsenergy.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INVOICE

Louise Nettelton
2137 Chilton Road
Houston, TX 77019
US

Customer Order Code: 6968345

FROM:
Register.com
575 8th Avenue
New York,  NY 10018
United States

Billing Inquiries:

Phone:  Toll free in the U.S. and Canada: (800) 899-9723
        Outside the U.S. and Canada: +1 (902) 742-1466

Online: http://www.register.com/create_ticket.cgi

	E-MAIL INVOICE FOR DOMAIN REGISTRATION/RENEWAL

Please see attached detailed instructions and registration
agreement.

Register.com is in receipt of valid  credit card information
for payment and confirms the following:

Domain Name:             ubsenergy.com
Subscription Length:     2 year(s)
Period From:             19-Dec-2001
Period To:               18-Dec-2003
Order ID:                20212527
Amount Charged (US$):    $70.00

--------------------------------------------------------------
Registrant agrees to the terms and conditions of the current
Services Agreement found at
http://www.register.com/service-agreement.cgi


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:		Monday, June 11th
Time:		11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call:	AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera (713-853-5984)
		or Bill Dorsey (713-646-6505) for the weekly dail-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

	Yes, I will attend in person	----------

	By video conference from	----------

	By Conference call		----------

	No, I will not attend		----------

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, June 8th.

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


As an FYI, from time to time I will be preparing NDAs for the Networks team
headed by Mark S. Palmer working with Travis on "Project Offline".  Project
Offline has evolved a form of NDA and added a non-solicitation clause and a
residuals clause.  I wanted you to be familiar with the form in case Travis
is not here, you,as are my backup lawyer for the Networks team.  The form,
like all my Networks forms is kept in my "Confidentiality Agreements"
subdirectory under "Forms" (in case you ever need it and I'm not around).
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 02:54 PM -----

	Kay Young
	04/25/2001 02:49 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Offline Form

The nonsolicitation clause is one way (rest is bilateral)  so if it is
included you have to remember to fill in its blanks.  (You probably would
remember this anyway!)

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com


Mark - How would we structure transactions in UK gas, UK weather, Brent and metals with the various hedge funds run out of New York?  Is there a way to back-to-back them with our London office through their existing ISDAs or would they have to enter into new ISDA agreements with ECTRIC?  Any thoughts you have on this matter would be well received in these quarters.  Thanks.  Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zivic, Robyn
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:16 PM
To:	Musch, Susan
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Dyk, Russell; Lassander, Richard; Radous, Paul; Sayre, Frank
Subject:	European Products

Susan-
As a follow-up on our earlier conversation, the list of European Products which our Hedge Fund Counterparties will probably have/ currently have interest  in trading with Enron are:

UK Gas
UK Weather
Brent
Metals

It is my understanding that the above products are booked under various Enron entities - ie Enron Europe, Enron Global Markets and Enron Liquids & Fuel Inc (ELFI)

Could you pls let us know if we will run into tax problems if: we book all financial transactions between ENA and our counterparties and then
do an Internal transaction between ENA and the above entities to move the risk to the appropriate book.

Thanks for your help

Beat regards,
Robyn
212-715-2396


Both of you are listed in Lotus Notes on this one.  Not sure who has had most recent contact.  I someone working on a no-confirms agreement for Chase already?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara; Theriot, Kim S.; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	The Chase Manhattan Bank - EOL

Mark,

Following a discrepancy with an incorrect confirm generated and executed for an EOL deal between ENA and Chase, Dutch Quigley on the Enron Gas desk has spoken with Greg Crowley, a Chase trader, and Cecile Taylor-Simpson (their confirms Manager) - and agreed that they would all like Enron to be the confirming party for EOL deals between us.  (Presently Chase is the Confirming Party for financial commodity confirms).

Can we, and do we want to, revise their Master Agreement to reflect this?  I thought perhaps this would be a good opportunity to try to get Chase to execute the EOL Amendment.

Please advise.
Thanks,
Diane
3.0443


MARKET NOTICE
December 6, 2001

		In Re:	CERS Market payments - February 2001
California Energy Resource Scheduler (CERS) full payment received for
February, 2001 Market transactions

ISO Market Participants:
The ISO is pleased to announce that today it received from the California
Energy Resource Scheduler (CERS) full payment for amounts due to Market
Participants for transactions in February, 2001.
The ISO will disburse these funds on December 13, 2001.

Client Relations Communications.1002
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


Joe,

Per our phone conversation, here is the loss calculator for volume in and out
of Nepool.

Please come by my desk if you have any questions.

Rebecca


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Buehler, Craig
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Whatley, Nan; Threet, Kay; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lee, Dennis; Dietz, Rick; Steele, Patricia; Licciardo, Jeanne
Subject:	 Photo from my yard

Took this last night when I was checking on some new baby chicks; I don't believe this one isn't going to hatch...

Craig


Matt and Denis:

I spoke with Matthew Flett about an hour ago and he advised that
EnronCredit.com Limited had finalized its ISDA.  I requested a copy burt he
has not yet sent it over.  Both ENE and ENA want to execute masters with MSCS
and we would like to work from your document.

Can you email me a copy?

Thanks.  Sara


Mr.  Lay,

A lot  of us old ex-Enron guys are rooting for you, don't give up.

Regards,

Duane
Ex-  Plant Manager
Cuiaba

Duane Schumacher
Tel: 1 809 334 1060
Fax:  809 616 2149


Ideally, a copy to both people would be best.  If that's too cumbersome, then
send the copies to Charlie and we'll get separate copies to Don.

Thanks.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/05/2000 08:12:11 AM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Charles
Dalphon/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS,
Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Molly.Johnson@enron.com, Scott.Goodell@enron.com

Subject: Transport Invoices

Don Kirkendahl (in your Houston office 713-350-8445) contacted me yesterday.
He
is requesting copies of the transport invoices.  Should I give the invoices to
him or should I send them to Charlie?


Scott and Bruce:
I understand from talking to Jane this morning that we will be able to work
with you as our counsel on the above transaction that we are working with ACE
on.  My understanding from our commercial people is that we should be getting
a redraft of the insurance policy sometime today with ACE which we will need
your help in reviewing.  Leslie Hansen and I will be working on this from the
legal end, with Leslie's focus being on the "power" issues and mine on the
"derivative" issues.  As I mentioned to Scott last week, we will alos need
your help in making sure that the derivative taht we draft is not construed
to be insurance.  A draft of the confirmation taht we anticipate using will
be sent out later this week.

In terms of timing, our goal is to be on-line by June 15th which will require
us to try to get all documentation finalized as soon as possible.  I will
keep you posted on any updates to our schedule.  Please feel free to call me
or Leslie (713-853-6121) with any questions.  If there are others that we
need to add to our distribution, please let me know.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

Gaurav:
Could you please add Bruce Wright to the Distribution List.  His number is
212-424-8620.  Please circulate to the Enron group, Bruce and Scott a
Distribution List with the information for the Enron people that are
involved.  Thanks.


FYI...

October 18, 2001

An unplanned outage at the ATHENS (ATH) Ohio Compressor station has
occurred.  Due to high throughput levels already in the system and the
restriction at ATH, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (TE) will not be
accepting physical increases for Gas Day October 18, 2001 upstream of
ATH.  This would include the entire Access Area, Market Zone 1 30 Inch &
24 Inch, Market Zone 2 upstream of the ATH compressor station.  Due Pipe
makeup cannot be accepted for Gas Day October 19,2001.  These
restrictions may be extended through the weekend.   Meter operators are
reminded to flow at scheduled volumes.

Should you have any questions, please contact your Operations Account
Manager.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


http://www.texassports.com/fbo/fbc/01sked.html

That's a good game too.


Attached is a directory of websites that I find valuable, in case you were
not previously aware of it.

http://www.dei.gr/main/utility.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"dick bryan" <bryan6110@msn.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:29 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Cc:	Richard Bryan
Subject:	Fw: confirmation of WV gas

Scott ,

Here is the email that I sent to John Hodge yesterday.  It has the  conf. letter with blanks to be filled in as an attachment.  One attachment  is in Word Perfect 9 format and the other is in wordpad format in case you have  trouble opening the WP version.

Thanks in advance for your prompt response.

Please address all emails to bryan6110@email.msn.com
 - JH011109.wpd
 - JH011109.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
09:23 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/14/2001 09:21 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/14/01


Short and sweet - just as you requested.
Ben


For you to add the wire instructions which are in my out box.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 05:52 PM -----

	"Caren S. Sweetland" <csweetland@Gibbs-Bruns.com>
	12/21/2000 03:35 PM

		 To: "'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Attached please find the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, edited
pursuant to our discussion this morning.  Only one other change has been
made; Robin wanted to include the language "or which could have been
asserted" in paragraphs 6 and 7.  If you need any additional changes or have
any comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 <<#94919 v3 - TVA Settlement Agreement II.wpd>>

 - #94919 v3 - TVA Settlement Agreement II.wpd


Great! Now get off your Blackberry and get back to having fun!

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:59 AM
To: Lokey, Teb
Subject: RE: PPA Processing

Pre April 1997 was specifically not covered by the 6 month rule. -- but 8 don't think that means that we are automatically required to process all old ppas.  I think we should plan to manually handle any pre 1997 ppas that we feel bound to accept.

FYI I saw Ken Caminiti at Animal Kingdom yesterday!
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


So, is this ok now?

D

	From:  Stella L Morris                           01/11/2000 11:09 AM

To: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Revision - Black Marlin - meter 986782 for 8/98 - UA4

The above meter is non-allocatable and was off system, actuals at meter #8693.
Thanks, Stella

---------------------- Forwarded by Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000
11:01 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stella L Morris                           12/28/99 05:55 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revision - Black Marlin - meter 986782 for 8/98 - UA4

Revision - According to measurement, there is flow of 7,394 in 8/98, however,
there is nothing to indicate this is gas that was received on HPL in OSS.   I
checked MIPs and there is a measurement statement that supports the flow rate
of 7,394 MMBTu.

Daren is there a deal in CPR which may not have fed over to OSS?   I checked
OSS for the whole year of 1998 and there are no other deals in OSS.  It does
seem strange that this is the only month of flow.

Thanks, Stella


Today I gave a presentation to the originators and traders in Gary
Hickerson's ag group, including a proposal of control procedures for
compliance with ag option restrictions.  Gary was not present, but the
procedures were well received by the group, who felt that they were practical
and could be complied with.

Attached is an outline of the presentation, including the proposed
procedures.  -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com