Oliver and Kirstee,
we are going to start running VAR for UK from RisktRac in stage environment
in parallel with the spreadsheet .

As soon as Winston runs the vatrfacs code based on recent data we'll send you
correlations and factors for UK curves
so that you can load these inputs into VAR spreadsheet and then compare the
spreadsheet results to RisktRac results based
on the same inputs (this will, in fact, repeat the exercise you and me did
during your visit in Houston in October).
I have to ask Winston to print out for you the forward forward volatilities
for some date so that you can put them
into the spreadsheet as well.

Thank you,

Tanya


Richard,

It looks good.  Send it off.

Thanks,

Sylvia Pollan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deming, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Pollan, Sylvia S.
Cc:	Barbe, Robin
Subject:	NG Energy Trading, L.L.C. & Interstate Gas Supply, Inc.

Sylvia-
Let me know if these confirms are ok to go out.

 << File: Export.doc >>  << File: Export.doc >>
Thanks
Richard
x54886


It looks fine to me.


Thanks.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com <mailto:bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com>
(713) 226-1143
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:18 PM
To: BSwanstrom@lockeliddell.com
Subject: Re: Enron Xcelerator

Not clear at this point.? No deals have been done.? My guess is that it
will be Lance and his group.? I will let you know when it gets sorted out.
Mark

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????? "Swanstrom,
Bill"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????

??????????????????? <BSwanstrom@lockeli??????? To:????
"'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>????????

??????????????????? ddell.com>????????????????
cc:??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????????????????????? Subject:???? Enron
Xcelerator????????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????? 05/20/2001 12:04
PM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

Mark, who within the Enron legal group is responsible for Enron
Excelerator?? From what I've heard about this initiative, it sounds like it
may be doing deals similar to what we've done for Enron in the past.? We'd
love to get the opportunity to help -- we have valuable experience we can
bring to bear in this area.? Thanks.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com
(713) 226-1143


Hello, I left a message for David Dupre and he has not called me back.  If
you want to have Matt call Tim Cannon at Sempra that would be fine.  His
phone number is (203) 355-5190.  I don't know why this has been so
difficult.  If I hear from David I will let you know.  I want to know how he
handled these deals in the past.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886

   Kate Symes                12/04/2000 06:31 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Futures Deal w/ Sempra

Just curious - did you ever catch up with Larry Joe Hunter regarding the Long
Term Southwest desk's futures deal with Sempra? I'm wondering if I should
grab Matt Motley before he goes home today to let him know he needs to get a
hold of Tim Cannon about the ADT. Let me know when and if you talk to him.

Thanks,
Kate


Please mark your schedules to note the change in the dial-in information for
the call mentioned above.  This change will take place immediately.

Date:  Thursday (weekly call)

Time:  4:30 pm (CDT)

Number: 1-800-998-2462 (domestic)
  703-736-7230 (international)
  passcode 5316376

Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.

Sender:  daphneco64@alltel.net
Date:  Fri, 28 Dec 2001 09:33:03 -0600
Subject:  Traditional Wedding Cost Responsibilities
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound URL Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'traditional wedding cost responsibilities.url'.

If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release.  If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.

North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)

Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.


Yours?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 03/17/2000 10:11
AM ---------------------------

Alan Aronowitz@ECT
03/17/2000 10:04 AM
To: Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com @ ENRON
cc: Mark.Taylor@enron.com@ENRON, Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com@ENRON,
Yasuyoshi.Goto@BAKERNET.com@ENRON
Subject: Re: On line contracts

To confirm EJ's role:

It will not be involved in EOL as a prinicipal contracting entity until we
are trading Japanese commodity products. However, it may from time to time
provide literature about EOL, including having a link in the ej website (to
be developed) to the EOL website.

Alan

Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com on 03/17/2000 02:34:57 AM
To: Mark.Taylor@enron.com
cc: Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com, Yasuyoshi.Goto@BAKERNET.com
Subject: On line contracts

Dear Mark

In Yasuyoshi Goto's view the agreements are well drafted and contain nothing
which is likely to cause a problem in Japan.  On the understanding that server
is to be located outside Japan, we have only the following comments:

Time of Execution

Section 3. (c) of the ELECTRONIC TRADING AGREEMENT provides that "Transaction
shall be deemed executed at the time that Enron first signifies its acceptance
of Counterparty's offer, accessible on the Website server."

We understand that this means a contract will be formed when Enron
"dispatches"
its acceptance to its Website server so that the acceptance can be seen by the
Counterparty's computer display (if he has not yet disconnected).  In other
words, the contract will be formed at that time even though the Counterparty
does not see Enron's acceptance (due to disconnection, communication error, or
some other reason).  If this is indeed the intention, the language could
perhaps
be clarified in this regard.  (Since the agreement is governed by New York
law,
we have no objection to the current language if this is clear under New York
Law.  Perhaps the UCC covers the point?)

Governing Law/Jurisdiction

We see no problem with the governing law and jurisdiction provisions as they
are.

Taxation

Would you please confirm the role if any to be performed by Enron Japan in
relation to this business, so that we can ensure that Enron Japan will not be
seen as a dependent agent (and therefore permanent establishment) of Enron
North
America Corp.

Best regards

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--------
This is an e-mail from Baker & McKenzie - Tokyo Aoyama Law Office (Qualified
Joint Enterprise Offices). The contents of this e-mail may be privileged and
confidential and are intended only for the use of the addressee. No one else
may
copy, forward, disclose or use all or any of it in any form. If you are not an
intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete
this e-mail from your system. Thank you


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 88761 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Mark,

I need to get back with MBF clearing on the net worth question.  I would like
for MBF to be the credit imtermediary for us.  I think the clearing company
has a $5 or $6 million net worth.  Marc Fisher has no problem personally with
the $10 million.


To : NYISO Business Issues Committee

What :    Additional Material (6)
For :     Business Issues Committee Meeting
When:     December 12, 2000

Attached, please find additional meeting material that will be covered
during agenda item #5B.

Regards,

Kristen Kranz
NYISO Customer Technical Services
518-862-9629 - Phone
518-862-9872 - Fax

(See attached file: Agenda#5B_KeyspanMotion.PDF)

 - Agenda#5B_KeyspanMotion.PDF


Only 2 days left??.
A Superior Datamonitor offer in association with Terrapinn
Receive a 10% discount on key company, industry and country data.
Terrapinn, in association with Datamonitor -The industry analysis experts are pleased to offer you this special introductory discount, giving you the chance to save money when subscribing to the brand new online information service - Datamonitor Dashboard.

The Datamonitor Dashboard is a compiled business information service, providing concise overviews of 10,000 companies, 2,500 industries and 50 countries.
Each overview contains 10-20 pages of essential business information that will help you to:
 Keep ahead of industry trends, issues and research
 Build new business leads and channels
 Assess the opportunities for new product development
 Understand your competitive environment

DASHBOARD...is compiled using published desk research and secondary data sources to create the company, industry and country profiles. Each profile is designed to save you time and money searching through reams of web based data sources - Dashboard does all the hard work for you!
For more information and samples click here: http://www.terrapinn.com/datamonitor/dashboard.asp?PMID=dmdb01
Dashboard Datamonitor the key to a wealth of business intelligence
Datamonitor is a premium business information company specializing in industry analysis. We help our clients, 5000 of the world's leading companies, to address complex strategic issues by providing unbiased expert analysis and in-depth forecasts across the Automotive, Consumer Markets, Energy, Financial Services, Healthcare & Technology sectors.
Don't just listen to us though...
"I think it will be a very valuable service and the sector selection will prove very useful for our needs"
Don't miss out on this opportunity! Subscribe to the Datamonitor Dashboard and you will save time and money - no more hours spent surfing the web looking for company, industry or country information.
And if you take advantage of our special offer today, you can benefit from a 10% discount. This offer is only available until Friday 21st December 2001 and applies to an annual single seat subscription.
To order Dashboard simply click here http://www.terrapinn.com/datamonitor/dashboard_register.asp
This message is brought to you by Datamonitor, in association with Terrapin.
If you prefer not to receive any further emails please reply to this email with unsubscribe in the subject line


did they look good or lucky to win?  how is roy playing?


Attached is our brief protest of the merger asking FERC to condition approval
on FPL and Entergy joining viable RTOs that include a real time energy market
and transmission type/congestion hedging tools (we cite to our previously
filed protests of Entergy and FPL's market based rates).  We also ask that a
grid operator (MISO or PJM) be established over the entities to the extent
that they are not in a viable fully functioning RTO by the merger approval
date.   We also reserve our right to file additional data on problems with
the merger, if necessary.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
02:01 PM ---------------------------

 - 0137413.01


I plan to attend.

Angela

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of LiteBytz
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 12:26 AM
To:	ENW-Employees_Houston@ENRON
Subject:	Lite Bytz RSVP

This week's Lite Bytz presentation will feature the following TOOLZ speaker:

Richard McDougall
Solaris 8
Thursday, June 7, 2001

If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to litebytz@enron.com by the end of the day Tuesday, June 5, 2001.

*Remember: this is now a Brown Bag Event--so bring your lunch and we will provide cookies and drinks.

Click below for more details.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/litebytztoolzprint.jpg


Janet,
 I have modified the above as we discussed.  Please check my math.


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122110.txt


-----Original Message-----
From: Manuel, Erica [mailto:Erica.Manuel@edelman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Allen, Stevan; AReM; Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail); Fairchild,
Tracy; Frank; Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail); Manuel, Erica; Megan
Beiser; Norm Plotkin; Warner, Jami
Subject: San Diego Union-Tribune: Rush to beat direct-access purchase
ban spurs fear

This article specifically mentions the threatened lawsuit by AREM as having
caused the PUC to drop its proposed order to ban direct access
retroactively.
Rush to beat direct-access purchase ban spurs fear
By Ed Mendel
STAFF WRITER
September 12, 2001
SACRAMENTO -- Some utility customers, mainly businesses, are rushing to sign
contracts with generators for cheaper power before regulators enact a
long-delayed ban, raising concern that costs may go up for the remaining
customers.
The state plans to ban "direct access" contracts with generators to keep
customers with utilities in order to help pay for power bought by the state
since January. Those state purchases will be covered in part by a $12.5
billion bond paid off by ratepayers over 15 years.
But many businesses, which say they need cheaper power now to remain
competitive, are signing contracts to bypass the utilities before the Public
Utilities Commission bans direct-access pacts, an action that could come as
soon as tomorrow.
"We have seen a significant increase in the last month," said Ed Van Herik,
a spokesman for San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
He said the amount of the annual SDG&E power load shifted to direct-access
contracts with generators increased from 10 percent at the end of July to
17.4 percent at the end of last month.
Allowing customers to shop around for cheaper power was the main promise of
the state's failed attempt to deregulate electricity. But when the utilities
ran up huge debts and could no longer borrow, the state began buying power
for utility customers in January.
To avoid harming the economy with a massive rate increase, the state decided
to spread out payment of the soaring cost of wholesale power by obtaining
decade-long power contracts and issuing the $12.5 billion ratepayer bond.
Now the state wants customers to remain with the utilities for two reasons:
paying their fair share of the state-subsidized power received earlier this
year and preserving a ratepayer base large enough to pay off the long-term
contracts and the bond.
The power provided by the state to utility customers looked like a bargain
earlier this year, when prices on the wholesale market skyrocketed while the
state raised rates for the customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and
Southern California Edison by about one-third.
The state has not raised rates for SDG&E customers. But an increase
averaging 12 percent for SDG&E residential customers is on the PUC agenda
tomorrow, along with several other actions that may be taken to pave the way
for issuing the $12.5 billion ratepayer bond.
PUC President Loretta Lynch said that before wholesale power prices began
soaring last year, about 16 percent of the power provided by the three
investor-owned utilities was being bought through direct-access contracts.
By last March, she said, the amount dropped to 1 percent.
"Certainly, the direct access tanked because the marketers dumped their
customers back on the utilities when the price rose last year," Lynch said.
But as wholesale power prices dropped in June, direct-access contracts began
to look like a better deal, and a number of customers have left the
utilities to get cheaper power.
At Southern California Edison, the number of customers with direct-access
contracts grew from 32,547 on June 21 to 37,718 by the end of last month --
an increase of 5,171, said Steve Hansen, an Edison spokesman.
"Now that the market has turned, everyone is bailing as fast as they can,"
said Mike Florio of The Utility Reform Network, a San Francisco-based
consumer group.
Most of the electricity obtained through direct-access contracts in recent
months apparently has been bought by businesses that use large amounts of
electricity.
"Most of the providers which serve small customers have simply stopped doing
business in the state," said PUC Commissioner Carl Wood, who with Lynch
outlined the PUC's proposed actions at a Capitol news conference late last
month.
The PUC delayed action to ban direct-access contracts, waiting for the
Legislature to act on proposals that would have allowed businesses to bypass
the utilities if they paid an "exit fee" to cover their share of
state-subsidized power.
The ban on direct-access contracts originally proposed by the PUC would have
been retroactive to July 1. But the retroactive provision was reportedly
dropped after a lawsuit was threatened by the Alliance for Retail Energy
Markets, a group of power marketers.
In the Legislature, a provision allowing utility customers to obtain
direct-access contracts beginning in 2003, if they pay exit fees, was added
to the Assembly version of a plan passed last week to keep Edison from
joining PG&E in bankruptcy.
The addition of the direct-access provision is one reason that the Assembly
version of the Edison plan is supported by the California Chamber of
Commerce. But the Assembly plan pushed by Gov. Gray Davis faces opposition
in the Senate.
Senate President Pro Tempore John Burton, D-San Francisco, said the Senate
would send an Edison bill back to the Assembly after making it a
"less-egregious giveaway" to the utility.
The main provision in the Assembly plan would allow Edison to eliminate most
of its debt by issuing $2.9 billion in bonds that would be paid off by
ratepayers.
The Foundation for Consumer and Taxpayer Rights, a consumer group in Santa
Monica, calls the Edison plan a "bailout" and is threatening to place a
measure on the ballot that would ask voters to overturn the plan should it
be approved by the Legislature and governor.
And TURN, the San Francisco consumer group, says the Assembly version of the
Edison rescue plan is more generous to the utility than a tougher plan
approved by the Senate in July and giving Edison an additional $1.8 billion.

The consumer group also says the direct-access provision in the Assembly's
Edison plan has "major loopholes" that would allow large customers to leave
the utilities without paying their fair share of state power costs.
"TURN opposes the reintroduction of direct access, because any 'savings'
that are claimed to occur are really nothing more than the result of cost
shifting to those who do not or cannot abandon utility service," the
consumer group said in a statement.
Copyright 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.

Erica Manuel
Edelman Worldwide / Sacramento
916/442-2331 phone
916/447-8509 fax
erica.manuel@edelman.com


FYI---  I changed the meter point on deal 589257 Duke F.S. from 18002800 to
meter 20606100 effective 1st.

Thanks,
Mark


Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 01:10 PM -----

	"BENNETT YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>
	05/17/2001 12:49 PM

		 To: Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com, Michael.Tribolet@enron.com
		 cc: "CARL EKLUND" <CEKLUND@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>,
"JAMES HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: 4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971OpenDocument

Judge Montali has issued a tentative ruling on the MidSet QF's motion to
suspend performance under their PPA's.  Click on the link below to view a pdf
file containing the 27 page decision.

In summary, the Court's tentative ruling is to deny the QF's request to
suspend the PPA's, to decline to set a deadline for PG&E to assume or reject
the contract and to find that the reasonable rate that PG&E must pay the QF
for energy delivered post petition pending assumption or rejection is the
rate determined by the CPUC in the Wood decision.

The Court then goes on to note that this case is an extraordinary one
requiring extraordinary relief.  The Court therefore tentatively ruled that
PG&E should pay some undetermined portion of the pre-petition arrearages to
the QF's in order to ameliorate the burden on the QF's and help get them back
(or keep them) online.

The Court therefore ordered PG&E, MidSet and the Committee to meet and confer
and attempt to reach a resolution of the amount of the arrearage to be paid.
Judge Montali states that "he has it in mind" that the amount perhaps should
be equal to the difference between the Wood rates and the market price.

Call me if you have any questions or have an trouble with the link.

Ben Young

http://www.canb.uscourts.gov/canb/Documents.nsf/bf0c3519af9731c88825671d006664
79/4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971?OpenDocument

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - 47997560.url


The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.


Mary,
I want my name and Theresa Brogan's added to the authorized approvers on
manual wires.
Thanks, Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 10:52
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           09/08/2000 10:09 AM

To: Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Dallman/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frieda Schutza/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Centilli/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Manual Wires

Mary, Larry and Wes,
We just received a faxed copy of the Manual Wire and Same Day Payment memo
which was sent by Betty Tauzier on 8/28/00.
Rate & Currency trades fx which is settled the following day and requires
next day payments for FX.  Currently we are severely hampered because our
infomation is required into Unify by 2:30 for an Accounts Payable run at 4:00
for next day payments.  We are still trading after these cut-offs and tying
out the day's activity with Trading.  Therefore, we currently have to rely on
manual wires to make payments to our counterparties on the value date.

We need to get timeframes which mirror our business requirements.  I would
like to get the Accounts Payable run for our companies, 842 and 967, moved to
after 5:00 pm.  Information is not due to the bank until next day. 8:00 am
London time.

Please let Laurel and me know what changes can be done to our processing
flows.
Thanks. Sheila


It looks like the California Electric Issues will not be addressed in the
Courts.  This leaves the CPUC (President Lynch taking direction from the
Governor) and potentially the Legislature.

Roger
---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 12/08/2000 05:08 PM
---------------------------

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 12/08/2000 04:50:00 PM
To: "'ryang@enron.com'" <ryang@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: California Supreme Court Denial of PG&E Petition

According to PG&E Corp.'s December 8, 2000  "8-K", on November 21, 2000, the
California Supreme Court denied PG&E's petition seeking review of an
appellate decision which had denied PG&E's appeal of the CPUC decisions
prohibiting post freeze recovery of cost incurred prior to the end of the
rate freeze (e.g., power purchase costs).


Shelley, I can take a stab at pulling together TW-related information today
and will run it by Jeff to see whether he has anything to add.  I am leaving
on vacation Saturday and have a lot of other work to finish up here before I
go.  Therefore it might be best to bring in someone else from
legal/regulatory to pull up the info for El Paso, Kern, etc.

Shelley Corman
12/06/2000 10:28 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Calif. Performance Issues

With concerns about curtailments and force majuere events in California,
Steve Kean has asked for the preparation of study of all possible types of
disruptions (e.g. curtailment, diversion, penalties, etc,) in the gas chain
flowing to Calif and who bears the legal/financial liability for each event.
Specifically, he has asked if ETS can assemble a description of such
provisions for the pipes delivering to Calif.

In particular, he wants a summary of following:

Curtailment - When do pipelines curtail?
Curtailment compensation
Imbalance Provisions
Penalties/OFOs
Allocations (For El Paso Only)

Help!  Do you guys have any materials explaining these provisions?  Steve
wants this all pulled together by Friday.


I probably shouldn't be so serious, but I think the current situation at Enron has made me less fun.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:48 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: AReM's 2nd draft of comments responding to Carl Wood

jim, he took at the CYA footnote.  it was a joke.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Mara, Susan; Williams, Robert C.; Smith, Mike; Wu, Andrew
Subject: RE: AReM's 2nd draft of comments responding to Carl Wood

Sue --

My thoughts on the filing.

1.    Pretty hard line with Comm Wood.  I don't have any problems with it as written, but comments like "CYA not Calif Youth Admin" is not appropriate.
2.    We don't deal with the requirement to submit contracts?  Should AReM address this?  My understanding is that for contracts with customers below 20kw we need to submit something (maybe with the price and term blacked-out)?  Is this correct?
3.    In the conclusion, don't we want to ask the PUC to take some affirmative action - tell the industry that they will never implement retroactive suspension, that their is no cost shifting, and that DA customers can extend without penalty?  The filing simply asks for no harm.

Thanks,

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:39 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.; Steffes, James D.; Smith, Mike; Wu, Andrew
Subject: AReM's 2nd draft of comments responding to Carl Wood
Importance: High

Gang,

Here is a current draft of AReM's comments due tomorrow.  Let me know if you have comments.  Enron will not be submitting comments separately.

Sue
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:37 PM
To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Bob Anderson; Curt Hatton
Subject: SECOND DRAFT OF TOMORROW'S COMMENTS
Importance: High

Attached for your review and comment is a second draft of tomorrow's comments on the Wood ACR.  I have added a significantly expanded section dealing with how the Commission's inaction and subsequent action contributed to the flow of customers back and forth between DA and bundled service.  My thanks to Aaron Thomas for his assistance on this section.

Also, I have deleted the "CYA - not the California Youth Authority" quip --  I had to have some fun while writing this on Halloween night!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>


pookie:
check this out:
www.sailmainecoast.com/index.html


paperloop.com
In U.S. East spot markets, northern bleached softwood kraft (NBSK) pulp prices declined just over a percent while hardwood spot transactions took a larger fall since July 2. Traders said that although some suppliers had pulled out of spot business, availability of various grades was still plentiful.
Prices for spot NBSK delivered in the Northeast or Midwest dipped $5/tonne to $420-$450/tonne, or 13 percent below July contract prices, paperloop sources said. Southern bleached softwood kraft (SBSK) on the spot market also fell, down $5/tonne to $400-$430/tonne.
"Prices are still eroding in the States (because) a lot of spot is still available, it's all over the place," said a supplier source. But he added that spot prices had eroded so badly in Asian markets that he pulled out altogether. Previously, some suppliers had diverted tonnage to Asian markets because of stronger demand for hardwoods there.
Both hardwood grades fell in the U.S. by $10/tonne on oversupply as producers tried to edge down their inventories. Northern bleached hardwood kraft (NBHK) closed the week about 18 percent below July contract prices at $340-380/tonne. Southern bleached hardwood kraft (SBHK) also ended at $340-380/tonne, but the lower end prices were partly keyed by low freight costs. One source noted that in the Northeast some buys were in "the low 300s."
"We have a ton of hardwood (available)," said a Midwest buyer source who indicated he was recently offered about 2,000 tonnes of spot NBHK at $360.


Felicia,

This is a merchant asset, which we currently own 100%, but plan to sell down
in the coming months.  It absolutely has separate HR functions from Enron --
they do not participate in Enron benefits, and we are working hard to prevent
any claims that we could be a joint employer with it.

Thoughts?

Michelle

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Felecia Acevedo @ ENRON                           11/02/2000 08:56 AM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

Michelle,  who is GSP?  Are they a legal entity?  Are they on our payroll?
If they are we filed EEO-1's for them.    Below is the criteria to file an
EEO-1 report:

Standard Form 100 must be filed by -

A.  All private employers who are: (1) subject to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of
1972) with 100 or more employees EXCLUDING State and local governments,
primary and secondary school systems, institutions of higher education,
Indian tribes and tax-exempt private membership clubs other than labor
organizations; OR (2) subject to Title VII who have fewer than 100 employees
if the company is owned or affiliated with another company, or there is
centralized ownership, control or management (such as central control of
personnel policies and labor relations) so that the group legally constitutes
a single enterprise, and the entire enterprise employs a total of 100 or more
employees.

B.  All federal contractors (private employers), who: (1) are not exempt as
provided for by 41 CFR 60-1.5, (2) have 50 or more employees, and (a) are
prime contractors or first-tier subcontractors, and have a contract,
subcontract, or purchase order amounting to $50,000 or more; or (b) serve as
a depository of Government funds in any amount, or (c) is a financial
institution which is an issuing and paying agent for U.S. Savings Bonds and
Notes.

All multi-establishment employers, i.e. employers doing business at more than
one establishment, must file: (1) a report covering the principal or
headquarters office; (2) a separate report for each establishment employing
50 or more persons; (3) a consolidated report that MUST include ALL employees
by race, sex and job category in establishments with 50 or more employees as
well as establishments with fewer than 50 employees; and (4) a list, showing
the name, address, total employment and major activity for each establishment
employ-ing fewer than 50 persons, must accompany the consolidated report.

All forms for a multi-establishment company must be collected by the
headquarters office for its establishments or by the parent corporation for
its subsidiary holdings and submitted in one package.

For the purposes of this report, the term parent corporation refers to any
corporation which owns all or the majority stock of another corporation so
that the latter stands in the relation to it of a subsidiary.

The OFCCP has always held that subsidiary companies that do not have direct
govt contracts must comply with AAP regulations if the parent company or
other subsidiary companies benefit from government contracts.  Their line of
thought is that the subsidiary without government contracts benefits
indirectly from the contract as well.   If GSP is completely free standing
and they do not participate in Enron's benefits, abide by our policies or
procedures , participate in our bonus process that may partially or wholly be
funded by Enron Corp. , etc., they may have some type of argement not to
comply  but I doubt it.  If we own them over 51% I don't see a way they could
not file EEO-1's and have an AAP.  We do all the AAP's in Corporate so if
this is a freestanding Business Unit I need to know.

Thanks!

Felecia

Michelle Cash@ECT
11/01/2000 07:49 PM
To: Felecia Acevedo/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

Felicia,  Does this sound right to you?  Just wanted to confirm.  Thanks.
Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 07:48
PM ---------------------------

HThomas@gspcorp.com on 11/01/2000 07:19:00 PM
To: michelle.cash@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com,
peter.del.vecchio@enron.com
cc: david.howe@enron.com, fran.mayes@enron.com
Subject: Privileged and Confidential communication to my attorneys

     Michelle and Peter, we (GSP) have determined that we are not a federal
     government contractor.  Based on feedback from GSP employees, we do
     sell newsprint to printers who print material for the federal
     government, but we are a 'second-tier' contractor, not a 'first-tier'
     contractor.  (Pat McCarthy, the local employment law attorney that I
     have been using, used these terms when David Howe and i talked to him
     today.)  Pat informed us that second-tier contractors do not have to
     abide by all the federal government requirements for contractors.

     Based on this, GSP does not plan to file EEO-1 reports or prepare
     affirmative action plans.  In addition, we do not feel that we are
     subject to an OFCCP audit.

     Michelle, since you left me the voicemail telling me that we are not
     included in the Enron EEO-1, i assume that also means that Enron's
     status as a government contractor does not force us to prepare EEO-1
     and AAPs.

     Please advise us if you feel we have made incorrect assumptions on any
     of this.

     Hoyt


Please re-map HPL Zone 4 from A/S East Beaumont to A/S East Beaumont Offer.

Call with any questions.

Dave
x35384


The attached names were just overlayed in GCP.

ACX Technologies, Inc.           to                Graphic Packaging
International Corporation
Newquest Energy Inc.              to                Ranchero Energy Inc.

The short names will be changed tomorrow afternoon, Thu,  Dec. 7. if there
are no objections.

Thanks

Cheryl x3-3103


fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: Fw:

Fyi.   If she's not there please resend for me.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
To: Campos, Kathy <Kathy.Campos@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Nov 28 11:40:51 2001
Subject:

Please send tomy direct reports.

While I am out of the officetoday please keep Kevin Howard up to speed on what you see and hear.  He is leading the effort in our areas during this time of stress/crisis for me.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


This request has been pending your approval for  45 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024686&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000024686
Request Create Date : 3/21/01 8:04:40 AM
Requested For       : juan.padron@enron.com
Resource Name       : TradeWave NEPOOL
Resource Type       : Applications


it sucks to be somewhere flat for new years


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041414.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -125.00 / Final: -124.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  25.00 / Final:  24.92)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -60.00 / Final: -59.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: NCPA
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


<<CSFB_EnergyTech_May1701.pdf>>

Summary:

* U.S. President George W. Bush unveiled his National Energy Policy
today.  In our report we list the recommendations made by the National
Energy Policy Development Group (NEPD) as they pertain to Renewable and
Alternative Energy.  In addition, following each recommendation, we provide
our views on the potential impacts on specific CSFB covered companies
(AstroPower - APWR, Ballard Power Systems - BLDP, Capstone Turbine - CPST,
FuelCell Energy - FCEL, Proton Energy Systems - PRTN) in the Energy
Technology sector.
* We would note that many of the recommendations instruct certain
departments or individuals to conduct further research on various topics and
to report back to the President at a later date.  Our view is that many were
included as a counter point to more contentious issues and may receive
somewhat limited action from the Administration.
* Overall, we are not changing our estimates or recommendations on any
of our companies at this point in time.  The proposed solar tax credit
when/if passed will cause us to review our forecasts for AstroPower.  We are
not forecasting incremental unit volume of production given the capacity
constraint of the company, although residential installations tend to have a
higher revenue per watt and higher margins than non-residential markets and
therefore could result in higher EPS contribution.

Regards,

Marko Pencak
416-352-4580
Cameron Jeffreys (Associate)
416-352-4581

Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON

 - CSFB_EnergyTech_May1701.pdf


John, I just spoke with Dan Walker, Vice President  of Development for the
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation about Enron's initiative for a corporation
partnership.  After we had discussed our interest and desire and what
opportunities are available with the Foundation for Enron, Dan stated that
will be visiting with the Foundation's CEO next week and one of the issues to
be discussed will be development of  an MOU or Agreement between Enron and
the RMEF.  Looks like things are beginning to progress.

Im having quite a bit of interest from some of the Houston based Enron
employees about how they can get involved.  Any suggestions on how I can
"advertise" opportunities within the Corporation for employee involvement
with the RMEF?


Here are just a few I could remember.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Kean" <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net>
To: <rkean@starband.net>; "Alan Kean (E-mail)" <rex04@msn.com>; "'Doug &
Karen Reiman (E-mail)'" <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>; "Kathy Wedig (E-mail)"
<kat.wedig@netzero.net>; "Melissa Kean (E-mail)" <kean@rice.edu>; "'Steve &
Melissa Kean (E-mail)'" <skean@enron.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: Dadisms

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Kean" <rkean@starband.net>
> To: "Alan Kean (E-mail)" <rex04@msn.com>; "'Doug & Karen Reiman (E-mail)'"
> <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>; "Kathy Wedig (E-mail)" <kat.wedig@netzero.net>;
> "Melissa Kean (E-mail)" <kean@rice.edu>; "Phil Kean (E-mail)"
> <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net>; "'Steve & Melissa Kean (E-mail)'"
> <skean@enron.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 7:08 PM
> Subject: Dadisms
>
>
> > I want to start a list around of some of dad's sayings.  Please add to
the
> > list and send it on to everyone.
> >
> > Run for the roundhouse Nellie, he'll never corner you there.
> > Slick as catshit and twice as nasty.
> > Like shit through a goose.
> >
> > Yeah, that's right, keep fiddlin' with that, you'll break it
> I think it's excess wild
> Ho! Ho! she cried in axis (accents?) wild and waved her wooden leg on
high!
>
> On  accounta the war.
>
> They'll have to shoot him on judgement day.
>
> Then of course, there are the names: Katy, Devie, My Little Mochawk, Phil
> Jofus, and Bubba
>
Choke a-- (referring to peanut butter)

> If it tastes good there are no calories

Didn't know you were in town (as driver passes on the right, etc.)

Like a couple of cub bears (meaning Rob and Phil)

Washington D.C. District or Corruption

Have some onions for defense

NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://www.netzero.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

"Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu> on 09/02/2000 01:00:24 PM
To: Frank Diebold <fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu>
cc:
Subject: Change of coordinates

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Effective immediately, I have returned to the University of
Pennsylvania.

The usual automatically-generated contact info should appear below;
please update your files.

Best regards,

Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@mail.sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


John:  Does this look alright for execution?  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 09:20 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	12/11/2000 09:36 AM

		 To: John Greene/LON/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Instinet

John:

I just received the Instinet amendment to place additional access at Enron
House.  The "Equipment" is described as follows:

2 Additional Instinet Access ID
   (GYO5, GYO6-OMS) - London, England

Please verify that this is what you need.  I can have this signed immediately.

Sara


John:

Nick and I spoke about this letter draft this morning before he left for D.C.
I will soon be preparing a few edits to this draft to attempt to mitigate the
risk that the online activities would be considered EJ activities for
tax/regulatory purposes without detracting from the PR value of the letter.
My understanding is that Joe wants to sign the letter (as opposed to having
someone from EOL sign) for market value reasons, which is certainly
understandable. I'll circulate that edited draft later today.

Susan: Please call me to discuss.

Alan

To: Nicholas O'Day/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com
cc: Joseph P Hirl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alan Aronowitz@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline Letter

Per our discussion earlier today,  attached is a draft of the letter we
propose to send out from Joe Hirl on Enron Japan letterhead during the week
of May 8.


Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

We are down to just seven days to purchase coast-to-coast fares from $178
roundtrip for travel through April 5, 2002. Our most popular $174
roundtrip coast-to-coast fare sale, which includes a free stopover in Las
Vegas through February 13, 2002, is also scheduled to terminate on
November 29, 2001. How about airfares to Europe from $214 roundtrip, how
about Hawaii for Christmas or New Year's through March 20, 2002 or Mexico
from $132 roundtrip? We still have Central and South America on sale and
the Caribbean through March 20, 2002. Be sure to check out all of our
great deals listed below and visit

http://www.bestfares.com for more even travel bargains.

Quickfare Finder Dishes Out Over ? Million Travel Requests In Two Days!

When we asked you to kick the tires on our new Quickfare Finder, you
kicked the tires! On November 19 and 20 Quickfare Finder dished out over ?
million travel requests, wow! The reviews have been remarkable, Quickfare
Finder is a big hit. If you would like to read a message from Tom Parsons
about Quickfare Finder,

click here. To test drive our new feature,

click here

Only Seven Days Left For Our $178 RT Coast-to-Coast Sale Thru April 5,
2002

While you are in the shopping mood, this would be a great time to think
about an inexpensive winter holiday or a spring getaway. We have several
cities on sale across the USA for $178 or less. Travel is valid through
April 5, 2002 with the best travel days being Tuesday, Wednesday and
Saturday. The cheap seats to Florida are almost sold out for Christmas and
New Year's, but consider Jacksonville, it is only a short 3-hour's drive
from Orlando. If you cannot find your city on sale, use our Quickfare
Finder for the best fare and the nearest alternative airport that will
save you big money. Visit

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=35820 for to find your
Best Fare.

Final 7 Days To Fly Coast-to-Coast for $174 RT + Free Stopover In Las
Vegas

Our biggest request through our Quickfare Finder this past week was Las
Vegas, bar none. Now we can offer you many coast-to-coast cities for only
$174 roundtrip and a free stopover (up to 4 days) in your choice of Las
Vegas or Phoenix. We also have our reduced Buddy Fares from many major
cities to Las Vegas for a reduced rate. Visit

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=45530

70 U.S. Cities To Tokyo $349-$549 RT Thru Sept. 30, 2002

If you can depart to Tokyo by March 20, 2002 you can fly from many U.S.
cities for $349 to $549 roundtrip for travel through March 20, 2002; add
$50 and you could travel through September 30, 2002. That's a savings of
up to $500 off the lowest published airfare. We also have Beijing,
Shanghai, Singapore, Taipei, Hong Kong and Seoul on sale through March 20,
2002.

Buddy Fares Can Save You Big Bucks If You Travel In Groups

It does not matter if you live in Portland, Maine; Madison, Wisconsin;
Billings, Montana or Spokane, Washington we can save you up to 60% off the
standard 21-day advance purchase fares for travel through June 30, 2002.
Visit our homepage and our new Quickfare Finder or directly to our Buddy
Fares section at

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=44800

Hawaii On Sale Through March 20, 2002

If you want beaches, sun and fun, think about our 50th state, Hawaii. You
can fly from Dallas, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, New York City, Boston,
Washington (DC) or Atlanta to Maui, Kona, Honolulu or Kauai for $599
roundtrip or less. You cannot travel on December 21-23, 2001 because it is
sold out, but other days may still be available even during Christmas and
New Year's at savings up to $400 off. Visit

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=856

Get More Of Europe With A Free Stopover

We are giving you more of Europe for less with our exclusive free stopover
in London or Frankfurt offer. Fly from Boston, Washington (DC) or New York
City to Amsterdam plus your choice of London or Frankfurt for only $258
roundtrip; from Los Angeles, Denver or Phoenix, $358 roundtrip; or from
Atlanta or Miami, $338 roundtrip. We have specials to over 30 cities in
Europe such as: Brussels from $258 roundtrip, Paris from $278 roundtrip,
Berlin or Munich from $271 roundtrip, Milan from $298 roundtrip and Madrid
or Barcelona from $301 roundtrip. Check out our free stopover in Europe
offer and all of our European specials at

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=58

Mexico On Sale From $132 RT Thru March 20, 2002

Can you believe Los Angeles to Los Cabos for only $132 roundtrip through
December 15, 2001? How about Phoenix to Mexico City for only $159
roundtrip (through February 14, 2002) or Atlanta to Guadalajara for $318
roundtrip? Check out all of these specials and more to Acapulco, Ixtapa,
Mazatlan, Hermosillo, Guaymas, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico City, Guadalajara
and Los Cabos with no blackout dates for holiday travel at

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646

Costa Rica And Central And South America On Sale Thru March 20, 2002

How about Chicago to Rio de Janeiro for only $398 roundtrip or New York
City, Denver or Detroit for $498 roundtrip; Dallas, Atlanta or Chicago to
Costa Rica for $290 roundtrip; Los Angeles, San Diego or San Francisco to
Belize for $360 roundtrip; Los Angeles to Lima for $335 roundtrip; and
more. We have many travel deals to Caracas, Santiago, Buenos Aires, San
Salvador, Guatemala City, Panama City and more. Visit

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=646

Caribbean On Sale For Spring Break 2002

Airfares to the Caribbean have been cut by up to $400 roundtrip including
the busy season of Christmas and New Year's. Our cheapest fares are to
Montego Bay and if you can return by January 15, 2002, you can fly for
even less. From Charlotte, the fare is only $200 roundtrip; from New York
City or Philadelphia, $215 roundtrip, from Washington (DC), $240
roundtrip; from Boston, $289 roundtrip; and from Chicago, $298 roundtrip.
We also have reduced fares to San Juan, St. Thomas, St. Maarten and Grand
Cayman is starting at $233 roundtrip. Check out our specials to the
Caribbean at

http://www.bestfares.com/travel/desks/story.asp?id=647

As Always, Check QuickFare Finder For Your Best Fare

Airfares change like the weather; Quickfare Finder is updated system wide
4 times a day, some routes every ten minutes. For example; Dallas to
Cincinnati is $275 roundtrip on most major airlines. Quickfare Finder
recommends flying into Indianapolis for only $117 roundtrip, a savings of
$158 or a family of four could save $632. Washington, DC to Los Angeles is
$319 roundtrip on American Trans Air and $374 on all other major airlines.
Fly to San Diego for only $138 roundtrip or Baltimore to Burbank for $174
roundtrip. Either way you could save more than $200 or even as much as
$800 for a family of four. Check out Quickfare Finder and travel the
planet for less at

http://www.bestfares.com

HOTEL RESERVATIONS NETWORK

Need a hotel room? Look no further because HotelDiscounts.com is the place
to find great deals at great prices. HotelDiscounts.com provides up to 70
percent off on hotels in major cities worldwide with guaranteed lowest
rates. Book online at

http://www.hoteldiscounts.com/cgi-bin/pickcity?SID=NW2&LKF=NW2

All offers are subject to available, and prices may change without notice.

You are currently subscribed to hotdeals as ebass@enron.com

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hotdeals-1324881S@hotdeals.bestfares.com

Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Nothing with or pertaining to either Morningstar and Insource to the best of
my knowledge.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	03/29/2001 02:30 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Two NDAs

Can you please let me know if there are any existing NDA's in place with
Morningstar Systems Inc. and Insource Techology Corporation.  Thank you!


I have attached the Media News Confirmation for your review. I highlighted
one phrase because the fax was hard to read. I also left a blank on Section
(iv) (ii) because there was a blank on your fax. Please advise.

Thanks,
jarrod


Lecture notes - 2 of 2 is now available for E220-1: Corporate Financial
Reporting through the Izio InfoPier system.  You will find it in the
'Handouts' section.

===========================================
This message was sent from the Izio InfoPier system.  To stop receiving these
notifications, please uncheck the box labeled "I want to be notified by email
when course information is updated" in the "Properties" section.


Vice:

I interviewed Nelson last week. Here is my feedback:

 1) Very communicative
 2) Good professional experience - works as a consultant
 3) Good quantitative background

He lacks a background in finance, which may be a minus for a position in the
group. I beleive he may be valuable for other areas that deal with emissions
and pollutants.
Paulo Issler


Revised one book.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gillis, Brian
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 1:18 PM
To:	Valdes, John
Cc:	Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	Revised Book Request


When: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Additional details forthcoming.


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


Attached hereto is the License and Service Agreement ("3rd Party Posting Agreement") for Swapco, for your review and revision to the extent you think necessary.

Best Regards,
Barbara Gray


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 09/07/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

Ann M Schmidt@ENRON
09/07/2000 01:04 PM

To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRO
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CNN Headline News Story

Rick,

Below is the transcript of the story you asked about this morning.  I have a
video copy of it as well that you can view upon your return.  Thanks, Ann
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 09/07/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

"Dave Vigil" <dvigil@vidmon.com> on 09/07/2000 11:00:21 AM
Please respond to <dvigil@vidmon.com>
To: <aschmid@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Video Monitoring Services of America, L.P. (VMS)

BROADCAST TRANSCRIPT
Video Monitoring Services of America, Inc.
10260 Westheimer
Houston, TX 77042
(713) 789-1635
(713) 789-0980 (FAX)

    Date      September 07, 2000
    Time      08:00 AM - 08:30 AM
    Station   CNN Headline News
Location  Network
Program   Headline News

Jacque Reid, anchor:
To save money, consumers are finding ways to cut down on costly electricity
bills.  Greg Clarking reports on how to get better rates using the Internet.
Greg Clarking reporting:
Helene Baldizzone, a New York City artist, was growing increasingly
concerned about rising electricity costs, so she signed up with start-up
electricity retailer SmartEnergy.com.
Helene Baldizzone (SmartEnergy.com Customer):  I thought, OK, well, let's
try somebody else because the bills had been going up little by little every
month with ConEdison.  So I thought, well, I have nothing to lose at this
point.
Clarking:  Baldizzone is happy with SmartEnergy where she has locked in a
rate of 8.3 cents per kilowatt hour.  She was paying as much as 13.3 cents
per kilowatt hour before switching.  SmartEnergy says its goal is to let
consumers take advantage of the sometimes confusing options created by
deregulation of the energy industry.
Gautam Chandra (President/CEO, SmartEnergy.com):  What we are doing is
taking that confusion away by being the agents for the customer in terms of
looking at the best prices, locking in the best prices for them.
Clarking:  SmartEnergy, currently available in New York City, will be
available in all twenty-four deregulated states within the next few months.
There are a number of electricity suppliers in each of the deregulated
states and consumers can save a lot of money by doing a little research.
Rick Cowles (Energyland.com):  Don't sit back and just hang in there and
wait and see what's going to happen a year or two down the road because
you're going to find that electric rates have definitely changed in a year
or two and it may not be to your advantage.
Clarking:  To find out what energy options are available in your area, you
can call your state's public utility commission or click on to
Energyland.com for a complete list of energy suppliers and their rates.
Cowles:  Right now, consumers are kind of in a unique position where they do
have the ability to go in and see some immediate savings.
Baldizzone:  It's easy.  But I like especially saving the money.  It's
better in my pocket.
Clarking:  That's Your Money.  Greg Clarking, CNN, New York.

                        # # #

For a videocassette(TV) or audiocassette(radio) of this news segment contact
your nearest VMS office Material supplied by Video Monitoring Services may
only be used for internal review, analysis or research.  Any publication,
re-broadcast or public display for profit is forbidden.


Greg,

I forgot to mention the Perrin Oaks ideas.  They are on the attached memo.

Have a good weekend.

Phillip


<http://www.emaildelivery.net/getimage.asp?id=542>

Dear ROD ,

You have received this email because you are a valued customer of Platts - the energy information division of The McGraw Hill Companies.

It's easy to subscribe to GLOBAL ENERGY BUSINESS. Click here to answer a few short questions and be on your way to your FREE subscription to GLOBAL ENERGY BUSINESS!

<http://www.emaildelivery.net/survey/psurdb.asp?ID=196&userID=FF8900D7>

GLOBAL ENERGY BUSINESS is the magazine of choice for energy executives and senior managers worldwide. In each issue, you will receive comprehensive analysis and perspective on a host of subjects essential to your firm's operation, including:

Energy Trading
Risk Management
Information Technologies
Power Generation
Energy Delivery * Finance
Retail Energy Business
Legal/Regulatory
Management Strategies
Corporate/Executive Profiles

Click on the link below to subscribe to GLOBAL ENERGY BUSINESS.

<http://www.emaildelivery.net/survey/psurdb.asp?ID=196&userID=FF8900D7>
If you feel you have received this message in error or would like to be removed from this list, please click on the link below. <http://www.dontemailme.com/Optout.asp?job=E6192&ID=FF8900D7>

  <http://www.emaildelivery.net/open.asp?JB=E6192&id=FF8900D7>


My pick for this week is the Vikings.  When are you setting me up with your hair dresser?


Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:25:49 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman"
<cshoneman@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Nancy
Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: New York Times - U.S. Orders Power Suppliers to Justify Prices in
California
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_005B81C0.533259AD"

A copy of FERC's March 16 Notice regarding the proxy price for Feb. 2001 is
attached.  This refund notice requires Duke Energy Trading and Marketing,
Dynegy Power Marketing, Portland General Electric Company, Reliant Energy
Services, the Mirant Corporation and Williams Energy Services to either
provide the identified refund amounts ($55 million) or defend the prices
charged.

Below is the New York Times article about this latest action by FERC.

March 17, 2001

U.S. Orders Power Suppliers to Justify Prices in California

By JOSEPH KAHN

WASHINGTON, March 16  Federal regulators told power suppliers in
California's volatile electricity market today to refund $55 million to state
utilities unless they could justify prices that regulators called excessive.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued the refund notice, which
affected six leading electricity generators, to cover the month of February.
Last Friday, it issued a similar order reviewing sales in January. In that
action, the agency asked generators either to justify or refund $69 million
in sales.

The refund mandates are part of a new push by the commission to intervene in
California's troubled electricity market. State and national political
leaders have put pressure on the agency to use its authority  it has the
obligation to insure just and reasonable electricity rates nationwide  to
limit skyrocketing prices while the state tries to unravel its failed effort
at deregulation.

The agency has indicated that it will also scrutinize electricity
transactions in March and April, possibly forcing refunds if it finds that
generators have charged rates above what the agency determines to be their
highest costs of production.

While the intervention has won support from some California officials and the
Bush administration, the agency's orders have been criticized as too narrow
by some California market watchers and one of the federal agency's
commissioners.

The agency decided to apply a so- called rate screen, effectively a price
cap, to electricity transactions that occur during California's Stage 3
emergencies. Emergencies are declared when electricity supplies fall to
within 1.5 percent of demand. The agency has said that generators are most
likely to charge excessive prices when supplies are tightest.

But California has seen similarly high prices even when it is not forced to
declare a Stage 3 emergency, California officials say. They have criticized
the agency for effectively blessing the profits generators have made during
those nonemergency periods by excluding them from the universe of potential
refunds.

The agency has also imposed a relatively high rate screen  a proxy number
intended to simulate the operating costs of the state's most inefficient
generating plants  on all sellers of electricity during crisis hours.
California officials had urged the agency to investigate the actual costs of
individual generators and compare them to the prices they charged, tailoring
penalties to the behavior of each generator.

In January, the commission set the rate screen at $273 per megawatt- hour. In
February, the screen rose to $430 per megawatt-hour. The commission said in a
statement that higher natural gas prices accounted for some of the increase.

"This sounds like a step backward instead of the aggressive action we need
from FERC," said Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, referring
to the agency.

"Before the energy crisis started in California, electricity was selling at
an average wholesale cost of $30 a megawatt-hour," Senator Feinstein said.
"And now, FERC is saying a baseline of $430 a megawatt-hour is a reasonable
cost. Something is really wrong here."

Agency officials declined to comment on the rationale behind their order.

The refunds to date are a small fraction of total electricity sales in the
state. California officials, using a different methodology and a different
time frame to calculate price abuses, had asked the agency to force refunds
of $550 million for December and January.

California utility executives have estimated that unless prices are abated
much more aggressively in coming months, the state could end up paying a $70
billion electricity bill in 2001, compared with $28 billion last year.

The latest refund notice named Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, Dynegy
Power Marketing, Portland General Electric Company, Reliant Energy Services,
the Mirant Corporation and Williams Energy Services, six of the country's
largest power marketers. Dynegy was asked to justify or refund $20.1 million
in sales, and Williams was asked to defend or rebate $21.5 million.

Spokesmen for the companies named have said that their companies operated
legally and ethically in California. Most of the companies said they planned
to accept the agency's invitation to defend their prices.

 - febproxy.pdf


thanks, come and visit

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you're cute

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

sorry i couldnt help it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

good grief

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:30 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

what do you do?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:29 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

so we go from not talking to sharing a room.  i can't keep up.

oh and you can share a room and not talk.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:29 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

its going to be hard to share a room and not talk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

ok, but please don't talk to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:28 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i will have to invite myself

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you will have to ask her.  i don't know who all she is inviting

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:26 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

am i invited

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:24 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i do it all of the time.  robyn said that when we are up and running again they are going to have something for their counterparties and she wants me to come.  who knows when that will be.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:23 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thats a long drive by yourself, when are you going to ny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am hopefully leaving around 3.  i have to go to my house and get my baby.....my dog

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:21 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i got in around 10, so what time are we leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:20 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

i don't let things go do i?  i'm just playing.  you can come if you want to.  where did you go to lunch?  have you been here all day?


Bryan,

On December 13, 2001, ACE Financial Services sent Jeff Kinneman, Enron North America Corp, a advisory that the Credit Derivative Transaction was under review and may be terminated.

I forwarded a copy onto M. Heard, S. Shackleton and A. Aronowitz and faxed a copy to both you and Simon on December 14, 2001.

Please advise how Enron Credit is dealing with this transaction.

Thanks. Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glover, Sheila
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 9:12 AM
To:	Seyfried, Bryan
Cc:	Hickerson, Gary; Shackleton, Sara; Hemsley, Simon
Subject:	Enron Credit Inc. Deutsche Bank Credit Derivative Transaction
Importance:	High

Bryan,

Deuthsche Bank served a credit notice to ECT Investments Inc. for the "triplets" trade.  This trade is not ECT Investments Inc.'s.  All the Credit business was transferred to Enron North America on November 2000 and the Credit book was transferred to Enron Credit Inc. in February 2001.  This trade should not be in ECT Investments Inc.'s name and should have been transferred by Enron Credit.

I would expect Enron Credit Inc. to settle the financial liablility of this trade and not leave it as an obligation to ECT Investments, Inc.

My understanding is that the obligation is around $800,000.

Please advise.

Regards,
Sheila


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 03:51 PM -----

	Nony Flores
	05/05/2000 09:23 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Memo to Brazilian Counsel

Tana,

Attached is the memorandum we sent to Brazilian counsel in 1996 which
addressed both, the physical and financial trading, I hope this helps.  Let
me know if you need anything else.

Thanks.
Nony


I am tired...........................................................................................................

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 3:28 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	You looked tired

get some rest this weekend.

Regards,
- R


FYI, I understand from our natural gas people that they do not like the
EnergyGateway form of GTC and want to transact on their platform with only
counterparties where we have a master agreement in place.


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 04:06 PM
---------------------------

Don Miller
08/29/2000 04:02 PM
To: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Teaser


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042016.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:  80.00 / Final:  79.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS


What do these changes do to you?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 03:49 PM
---------------------------

Regan M Smith
07/05/2000 08:53 AM
To: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Randy Rippentrop/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Beverly Fennessy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan S Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark J
Leskowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Shieh/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Louie
Truong/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jun Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon Sear/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kevin T Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry
Sanvido/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Lebrane/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Lana Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SAP / Global/ Unify replication problem on Friday June 30th

On Friday June 30th, Unify's production performance was impacted by a large
volume (30k) of replication/ configuration transactions from SAP.
The mass update from SAP to Global/ Unify effected Enron's business
throughout the afternoon, causing contract replication to be delayed, and
missed nominations.

Corrective actions taken to ensure this does not occur again:
Global Replication - Move the SAP to Global/ Unify replication for
Intercompany from hourly to a nightly (1:00 am) process.  As we could miss
new data setup dependencies, the volume is expected to be reduced.
SAP Support - SAP IT support will notify Global systems of any scheduled
'rebuilds'/ mass updates to monitor/ move the schedule during an off-peak
time.

Regan Smith, x39291
Manager, Unify Accounting
Unify/ SAP Interface


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		4/20/2000
Task Start Date:	4/20/2000


Attached please find a Service Schedule to the Crestone/ENA Master Services
Agreement.  This is intended to cover the ENA purchase of Citation's gas at
the receipt points under the Bear Paw Gathering Agreement with Citation with
redelivery at the terminus of Fort Union.  I am not sure this is the best
structure for effectuating this transaction and would like your thoughts.
Another thought would be to have Citation Partially assign its gathering
agreement to ENA and have ENA pay Bear Paw for the Bear Paw piece and use
this schedule only for the Fort Union Gathering Service.

Question:  How did ENA handle the Bear Paw gathering fee in its agreement
with Citation? Did they take a partial assignment of the Citation/Bear Paw
gathering agreement?

Shonnie


Ken:

Confirming our telephone discussion, Atlantic Richfield Co will be doing some maintenance on Monday Sep 10.  The pre-schedule for Monday will be 10 On Peak and 26 off peak.

On Monday morning, you will be bringing the unit down so you will buy from us as follows:

Buy From EPMI Real Time:  Real Time decs the gen schedule
HE 5 - 11 MW
HE 6 - 16 MW
HE 7 - 16 MW

Later that day you will be bringing the unit back up, generating more than your pre-schedule so you will sell to EPMI as follows:

Sell to EPMI Real TIme:  Real Time incs the gen schedule
HE 19 - 16 MW
HE 20 - 16 MW
HE 21 - 16 MW
HE 22 - 16 MW

Chris Foster
chris.h.foster@enron.com
(W) 503/464-3822
(Cell) 503/702-8568


Good to finally hear from.  Judging from your e-mail, it sounds like you had
some fun in your exercises- I guess that English degree is finally paying off.
Luckily you missed out on another series of disappointments from the Longhorn
football team.  It seems as though they are improving, however.  Hopefully we
will be playing for the National Championship next year.

How are things otherwise?  When are you coming into town again?

Later-

Eric


<<6-14-01.doc>>  <<SUMMARY.xls>>

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 - 6-14-01.doc
 - SUMMARY.xls


Dear jason,

ROCKETS TO DO BATTLE WITH THE MAVS SATURDAY

After trailing the Lakers by 15 points in the third quarter of last night's game, the Rockets needed a lift. They turned to the sold-out Compaq Center crowd and got what they were looking for.

With the house-a-rockin', Steve, Cuttino and the gang led a furious second-half Rockets rally spurred by the energy of the sold-out arena. Although the comeback fell just short, the fans' support was a certain factor in the rally.

The Rockets will be looking for the same support Saturday when Michael Finley, Dirk Nowitzki and the Dallas Mavericks pay a visit to Compaq Center for a Texas Showdown. Game time is 7:30 p.m.

Tickets are going fast, so get yours today by calling 1-800-4NBA-TIX, visiting any Ticketmaster outlets or the Compaq Center box office, or ordering online at rockets.com (http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=133970&UID=45454538&MID=188026).

See you at Compaq Center!

-----------------------------------------------------
<!--Order your Rockets season tickets today by calling 713-627-DUNK.

To receive this email with graphics, colored text and active links, just go to: http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/validate.cfm
and enter your e-mail address. Click on "Modify Your Account" and then change your "Preferred E-mail Format" from TEXT to HTML!

Have any friends or family that would like the latest information on the Houston Rockets delivered right to their e-mail box? Just direct them to http://www.rockets.com to sign up for Rockets E-Blastoff.-->

To Modify Please Click On -
http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/modify.cfm?clientid=713&userid=45454538

To Deactivate Please Click On -
http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/deactivate.cfm?clientid=713&userid=45454538
-----------------------------------------------------
Topics: Single game tickets


Errol -

Here is Alroy's number.  I would call him as soon as possible.  Let me know
what the verdict is and when you talk to him.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001
10:18 AM ---------------------------
From: David Oliver on 05/04/2001 04:06 PM GDT
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Cat Carrier

Jeff,

I'm pretty sure that Errol hasn't talked with Alroy yet.  You can contact him
on the tie line @ 7830 - 35568.  I know he is very interested in a spot in
Houston, so any help you can give we would both appreciate!

Dave


Per Mark Taylor's phone call this afternoon, please review the attached list
of what you currently show in the database as elected postions.

Please advise as to any positions which should be removed, added, amended and
the effective date for each as to ensure authority for anything you have
already signed.

Sincerely,

Matt Maxwell


I never would have guessed smoked oysters.  I think I'm cooking for the 4 of
us, plus Lena and any stray friends we find.  We will probably come to
Palacios on Saturday and spend the night, although I haven't discussed it
with Mom yet.

It is dreary here today, but in a nice way.  I don't mind it too much,
although by Sunday we may be stir crazy.

We went to Michael's school on Wednesday, as his class was singing in
chapel.  Roger Clements was there, video cam in hand, doing the dad thing.
He is a really big guy, much bigger than I thought.  He looks like a football
player.  I see why Piazza didn't take a swing!

I would say "break a leg" for Katie, but with your groups orthopedic
problems, I hesitate to use the phrase!

Love,

Kay


Dear Reader,

You once had a free trial to TheStreet.com and expressed interest in
receiving financial information. Well, here's a great opportunity to
receive a subscription to RealMoney.com - for FREE.

Just open a Datek Online account and fund with a minimum of $1,500,
(current Datek Online account holders qualify by opening a new account and
fund with a minimum of $1,000) and Datek will pay for your one-year
subscription to RealMoney.com regularly valued at $199.95.

Datek Online is the online broker that gives you access to advanced
technology and information once reserved for the privileged few.  If you
are serious about online investing, there is only one online broker to
trade with:  Datek Online.

If you are ready to open a Datek Online account, apply online at:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1657729;2900123;f?http://www.datek.com/email/tsc
e

Please don't forget to enter your special Activation Code: TSCE when
applying for your new Datek Online account.

Or, if you want more information on Datek Online, please go to:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1657729;2900123;f?http://www.datek.com/email/tsc
e
and click the "Datek.com" button.

Don't delay, you have until December 31, 2000 to open your Datek Online
account and get your free subscription to RealMoney.com.

Sincerely,
TheStreet.com and Datek Online

System response and access times may vary due to market conditions, system
performance and other factors.
2000 Datek Online Brokerage Services LLC, Member NASD/SIPC

**Please DO NOT reply to this email.**
If you would like to contact Datek in regards to this special offer please
email us at support@datek.com or call 1-800-U2-DATEK and speak directly
with a Customer Support Representative, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

If you no longer wish to be updated with information from TheStreet.com,
please send an email to: promail@realmoney.com.


Michelle Lokay,

Fellow HEA Members:

Please read the attached letter carefully and forward any comments or
suggestions you may have to the HEA office.  Your input in this regard is
critical to the HEA continuing to serve its members.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent by:

Steve Becker, President
Houston Energy Association (HEA)
Phone: (713) 651-0551
Fax: (713) 659-6424
sjbecker@columbiaenergygroup.com

If you would like to have your email address removed from our mailing list,
please click the link below to the HEA Home page, where you will find a
mini-form to remove your name automatically.

http://www.houstonenergy.org/
?O1.-?:?


Actually this is better

 - BallotWPBF11[1].11.00.doc

Louise Kitchen
11/13/2000 05:06 PM
To: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON
cc: Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Darren
Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcello Romano/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Haakon Olafsson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Phillip -SYDNEY-
Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Takashi
Kimura/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

 - Floridaballo1.jpg

Jonathan Whitehead @ ENRON   11/13/2000 04:34 PM

To: Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Darren
Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcello Romano/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Haakon Olafsson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Phillip -SYDNEY-
Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Takashi Kimura/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

----- Forwarded by Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron on 11/14/2000 07:31 AM -----

	Whitehead@aronsonpartners.com
	11/14/2000 12:44 AM

		 To: Atkins@aronsonpartners.com, Fitzgerald@aronsonpartners.com,
Dixon@aronsonpartners.com, Rogers@aronsonpartners.com, nwhitehe@yahoo.com,
Austin.Summerford@mba02.bus.utexas.edu, ghbarr2@pop.uky.edu,
Mark_Adelman@snowe.senate.gov, James_Gordon@hillspet.com, charring@fbr.com,
jonathan.whitehead@enron.com, edorros@nyc.rr.com, CDavis@mainspring.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

this is a good one.

 - ballot.gif


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
01:32 PM ---------------------------

Andrew_M_Ozuna@bankone.com on 03/07/2001 11:41:43 AM
To: Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Sagewood Phase II

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew M Ozuna/TX/BANCONE on 03/07/2001
01:41 PM ---------------------------

Andrew M Ozuna
03/06/2001 03:14 PM

To:   "George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
cc:
Subject:  Sagewood Phase II

George,

Thank you for the opportunity to review your financing request for the
Sagewood
Phase II project.  Upon receipt of all the requested information regarding the
project, we completed somewhat of a due diligence on the market.  There are a
number of concerns which need to be addressed prior to the Bank moving forward
on the transaction.  First, the pro-forma rental rates, when compared on a
Bedroom to Bedroom basis, are high relative to the market.   We adjusted
pro-forma downward to match the market rates and the rates per bedroom we are
acheiving on the existing Sagewood project.  Additionally, there are about
500+
units coming on-line within the next 12 months in the City of San Marcos,
this,
we believe will causes some downward rent pressures which can have a serious
effect on an over leveraged project.  We have therefore adjusted the requested
loan amount to $8,868,000.

I have summarized our issues as follows:

1.  Pro-forma rental rates were adjusted downward to market as follows:

     Pro-Forma                           Bank's Adjustment
     Unit           Unit Rent Rent/BR    Unit Rent      Rent/BR
     2 BR/2.5 BA         $1,150          $575           $950           $475
     3 BR/Unit      $1,530         $510       $1,250         $417

2.  Pro-forma expenses were increased to include a $350/unit reserve for unit
turn over.

3.  A market vacancy factor of 5% was applied to Potential Gross Income (PGI).

4.  Based on the Bank's revised N.O.I. of $1,075,000, the project can support
debt in the amount of $8,868,000, and maintain our loan parameters of 1.25x
debt
coverage ratio, on a 25 year amo., and 8.60% phantom interest rate.

5.  The debt service will be approx. $874,000/year.

6.  Given the debt of $8,868,000, the Borrower will be required to provide
equity of $2,956,000, consisting of the following:

     Land -                   $1,121,670
     Deferred profit& Overhead     $    415,000
     Cash Equity              $1,419,268
     Total                    $2,955,938

7. Equity credit for deferred profit and overhead was limited to a percentage
of
actual hard construction costs.

(See attached file: MAPTTRA.xls)

 - MAPTTRA.xls


a special request from Mr. Lay


Attached is a first draft of my GIR testimony.? Your comments would be
appreciated.?

In returning your comments, please send them to:

Eric Nelson at ENelson@socalgas.com
Dave Follett at DFollett@sempra.com
Dave Barker at DBarker@socalgas.com

Thank you.

 <<nelson_testimony_425.doc>>

Eric Nelson
(213) 244-4250
(213) 244-8088? FAX
enelson@socalgas.com

 - nelson_testimony_425.doc


great news --- thanks so much

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Gray, Mary Griff
Subject:	RE: MidAmerica Energy ability to transact US east power options calls/puts (LD as well)

Today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gray, Mary Griff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:46 AM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	MidAmerica Energy ability to transact US east power options calls/puts (LD as well)

Miss Tana,

Do you have an ETA on this?

Thanks,
Griff


Should be able to help out.  Please send me the resume and I will reply by
end of day.

Start date is June 4th.

Thanks.

	Karen Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/18/2001 08:36 AM

		 To: Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kim Melodick/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Interns

Hi Juan

Thanks for speaking with me earlier.   Ted , will be speaking with the
interns (both Associate and Analyst level) who are scheduled to start June
4th  to discuss the real time opportunity.  For the moment therefore , we
will re-assign Andrew Kandolha to someone else as he is starting next week.

Lloyd  - can you possibley absorb, per our discussions this am, Andrew .

Background:  Dynergy: Power Settlements Intern
   Natsource Institution Energy Brok: Power Broker Intern
Academics:  Texas A& M Uni - Backelor of business Admin in Fiannce.

I will forward you the resumes this am.

Many thanks .

Karen.
x54667

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Buckley, Karen
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Hernandez, Juan
Cc: Melodick, Kim; Engler, Adrianne
Subject: FW: Allocatioon of A&A

Hi Juan

Per my previous e:mail below we have now assigned you your second requested
intern (per Kevin Presto's earlier request to John Lavorato).    These Inters
were on Kevin  Presto's actual selection of candidates for his world.   Their
names as per the attached spreadsheet:   I believe you will have Andrews
resume as earlier sent, and I will forward you Joseph's today.

Joseph Spector    Start date:   June 4th
Andrew Kandolha  Start date:  May 21st

The A&A Program will be in contact with your assistant to set up appropriate
systems etc.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Buckley, Karen
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:36 PM
To: Will, Lloyd; Herndon, Rogers; Hernandez, Juan; Bentley, Corry
Cc: Melodick, Kim
Subject: Allocatioon of A&A

Pls find the allocation of A&A and interns to your groups.

rgds, Karen.


MEDIA CONTACT:         Terrie Prosper           October 2, 2001         CPUC:  118
                        415-703-1366                tdp@cpuc.ca.gov

           PUC AND EDISON SETTLE FEDERAL LITIGATION TO MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICE WITHOUT RAISING RATES
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and Southern California Edison (Edison) today reached a settlement in the Filed Rate Doctrine lawsuit Edison filed in federal court against the PUC.  The settlement is intended to restore Edison to creditworthiness so that it is able to resume procuring the electricity needed by its customers; limit ratepayers' costs of paying off the debt; and maintain the state's role in regulating the investor owned utility by enabling Edison to pay down its back debts over a reasonable, certain period of time.  The terms of the Settlement Agreement include:

? Edison will apply cash on hand, plus all of its revenue over recoverable costs, to paying off its back debt.  The PUC and Edison have agreed that the amount of the back debt to be recovered from ratepayers is the amount of certain outstanding debt Edison had at August 31, 2001, less the cash on hand on that date, less an additional $300 million adjustment.  The amount that will be paid down pursuant to the settlement agreement is estimated to be $3 billion as of the end of this month.  The parties believe that the amount to be paid by ratepayers will be much less than the cap.

? Edison will not pay any dividends on its common stock through 2003, or on the full payment of its debt, if sooner.  If Edison has not fully paid its back debt by the end of 2003, the Commission retains the discretion to determine whether Edison will pay a dividend in 2004.  Edison is free to resume paying dividends in 2005. Since Edison's annual dividend has typically been about $400 million, Edison's shareholders will have forgone at least $1.2 billion in dividends and possibly more, in addition to the $300 million adjustment.

? Edison will apply 100% of any recovery it obtains from refund proceedings at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or litigation against sellers to pay down the back debt.  Edison commits through court order to work with the PUC and the Attorney General in pursuing litigation against the energy sellers.

? The PUC can direct Edison to use $150 million each year for other utility purposes, including the provision of additional energy efficiency monies, which would otherwise be used to pay down the Edison debt.

? The PUC agrees not to lower Edison's retail rates below their current level through the end of 2003 unless the back debts are recovered.  However, rates may be reduced as a result of a securitization of the debt or reduced DWR revenue needs.

? The PUC agrees to set rates not higher than the current rate, to enable Edison to recover the remaining amount of the back debt over 2004 and 2005 if Edison's back debt has not been recovered by the end of 2003.

? There are no concessions of PUC or State regulations or regulatory authority over Edison, nor is there any deregulation of valuable transmission and generation facilities.

? Edison may make up to $900 million in capital expenditures annually.
"This settlement embodies a fair and judicious way for Edison to become solvent and get back in the business of buying power, while meeting the needs of ratepayers and the state of California," said Loretta Lynch, President of the PUC.  "The settlement also ensures that all of the benefits of any refunds arising through litigation against power generators and marketers that profited from unjust and unreasonable energy prices will benefit ratepayers."

This agreement settles a November 2000 federal court lawsuit filed by Edison against the PUC, in which Edison claimed that the Commission's actions in not providing sufficient retail rates, violated federal law and was an unconstitutional taking of its property.  Under this agreement, Edison will release the PUC from all claims in its lawsuit and will also withdraw any challenges to the Commission's decisions implementing AB 1X, AB 6X, and the TURN accounting proposal.

                                                                                # # #


You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be
handed out to all participants.

In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday
and
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm


Here is the latest copy of the Rockies forecast for the meeting today at 3:30pm CDT.  I am assuming the other guys will send you a copy of what they are presenting.

Jay


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 06/29/2000 02:53
PM ---------------------------

Derek Davies
06/29/2000 09:25 AM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fishin

---------------------- Forwarded by Derek Davies/CAL/ECT on 06/29/2000 09:25
AM ---------------------------

Howard Sangwine
06/12/2000 05:55 PM
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ulf Ek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fishin

You need sound ability with this one......

lew <<fishin.exe>>

 - fishin.exe