-----Original Message-----
From: 	Danz, Suzanne
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Bibi, Philippe A.; Blachman, Jeremy; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Cline, Wade; Cox, David; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Elliott, Steve; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Hannon, Kevin; Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; McCarty, Danny; McConnell, Mike; McDonald, Rebecca; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark; Olson, Cindy; Pai, Lou; Piper, Greg; Rice, Ken; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Skilling, Jeff; Sunde, Marty; Whalley, Greg; Adams, Jennifer; Armstrong, Julie; Blackwood, Connie; Bob, Vanessa; Bolen, Vivianna; Brelsford, Loretta; Brown, Carol Ann; Burns, Jennifer; Campos, Kathy; Carter, Rebecca; Chapman, Kay; Dalton, Dorothy; Danz, Suzanne; Dauterive, Inez; Davidson, Binky; Daw, Nicki; Dick, Sharon; Dodgen, Kathy; Estrada, Mercedes; Ferrari, Kerry; Fisher, Dolores; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Gadade, Mrudula; Garcia, G.G.; Grow, Christina; Harris, Stephanie J; Hawkins, Linda; Heathman, Karen K.; Hillis, Kimberly; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Johnson, Kelly; Maronge, Bridget; Marshall, Lucy; McCurley, Peggy; McMahon, Kathy; McVicker, Maureen; Moffett, Carol; Owens, Karen; Paxton, Jana L.; Phillips, Cathy; Rapacioli, Marisa; Rijo, Leah; Schiller, Marsha; Schoppe, Tammie; Sera, Sherri; Spiller, Tina; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Urquhart, Lauren; Wells, Tori L.; Westbrook, Sharron; Williamson, Joannie
Subject:	Executive Committee Weekly Meeting

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting

Date:		Monday, June 4, 2001
Time:		11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf. Call:	AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera (713/853-5984) or
		Suzanne Danz (713/853-6440) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

Yes, I will attend in person		__ [Derrick Jr., James]  x ____

By video conference from		______

By conference call			______

No, I will not attend			______

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, June 1.

Thank you,
Suzanne


This is to confirm tomorrow's USEC Meeting with Richard Kingdon and Michael
Woo.  The meeting will take place in EB3321 @ 10:00a.m. on Tuesday, March 21.

Many Thanks,

Liz


Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following
items:

07:26AM EDT  5-OCT-00 BEAR STEARNS (SCOCOZZA/DALE/HANTMAN) BMCS CA
BMCS:  BMC SOFTWARE PRE-ANNOUNCES DISAPPOINTING Q2 RESULTS

07:14AM EDT  5-OCT-00 UBS WARBURG (US) (JORDAN KLEIN) CA BMCS IBM CA.GWI IBM
CA: VISIBILITY SHOULD REMAIN LOW; REITERATE HOLD RATING

07:50AM EDT  5-OCT-00 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (JOHN C. DEAN) EMC
EMC: WE BELIEVE COMPUTER STORAGE SELLOFF UNWARRANTED

08:17AM EDT  5-OCT-00 CHASE H&Q (WILLIAM A. LEWIS) MXTR SEG WDC HDD
THE KING IS DEAD; LONG LIVE THE KING--MAXTOR BUYS QUANTUM'S DRIVE BUSINESS

07:18AM EDT  5-OCT-00 MORGAN STANLEY\DW (MUNSON, GILLIAN) DELL
DELL: AND ANOTHER ONE...

08:34AM EDT  5-OCT-00 BOFA MONTGOMERY (KING, KURTIS R) DELL
DELL: FROM ANALYSTS' MEETING: FY 3Q, 4Q REVENUES TO BE LIGHT DUE TO EUROPE

 <<10.05.00 Analyst Reports.doc>>

The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts
who monitor and track Compaq's performance.  These reports are not prepared
by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or
verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of
these analysts.   These reports are being provided solely for business
reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other
individuals outside of Compaq.  If other individuals are interested in
receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in
Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.

Elizabeth Davis
Compaq - Investor Relations
Research Analyst
281-518-4289

 - 10.05.00 Analyst Reports.doc


Here's the second message.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 11:18 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	11/16/2000 11:07 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Closing

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/16/00 11:05 AM -----

	"Lowe, Deborah" <deborahlowe@akllp.com>
	11/15/00 02:10 PM

		 To: <annmarie.tiller@enron.com>, "Barbour, David" <davidbarbour@akllp.com>,
<bill.bowes@enron.com>, <brenda.l.funk@enron.com>,
<brent.vasconcellos@enron.com>, <brian.steinbrueck@enron.com>,
<carol.st.clair@enron.com>, <clint.freeland@enron.com>,
<clint.walden@enron.com>, <damon@rlf.com>, <david.bermingham@rbcds.com>,
<emily.jelich@royalbank.com>, <gareth.bahlmann@enron.com>,
<gina.karathanos@enron.com>, <jlawler@wilmingtontrust.com>,
<john.bruen@rbcds.com>, <kenton@rlf.com>, <kevin.d.jordan@enron.com>,
<lkao@mayerbrown.com>, "Lowe, Deborah" <deborahlowe@akllp.com>, "McFarling,
Muriel" <murielmcfarling@akllp.com>, <mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>,
"Popplewell, Tom" <tompopplewell@akllp.com>, <ryan.siurek@enron.com>,
"Sargent, Pat" <patsargent@akllp.com>, "Sullivan, Danny"
<dannysullivan@akllp.com>, <tamullen@prickett.com>, <tara.rafter@enron.com>,
<tellwood@mayerbrown.com>
		 cc: "Krecek, Chris" <chriskrecek@akllp.com>
		 Subject: Closing

Please be advised that you may reach David  Barbour, Danny Sullivan, Chris
Krecek?or me in our Houston office after  6:00 this evening.? Muriel
McFarling will not be leaving for Houston until  tomorrow morning.? The
contact information is as follows:
?
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas? 77002-3090
42 Main Conference Room - (713)  220-4242
(713) 220-4200 (main)
(713)?220-4285 (fax)
?
 - Blank Bkgrd.gif


---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT on
12/14/2000 12:21 PM ---------------------------

cathy@pira.com (Cathy) on 12/14/2000 10:06:11 AM
To: "PIRA Western Grid Retainer Client" <vwatkins@pira.com>
cc:
Subject: PIRA Electricity Report, NOx Emissions Market in Southern California

PIRA Western Grid Clients:

Energy Group,s Emissions Market Intelligence Services (EMIS) has just
released its report entitled, The Southern California RECLAIM Market:
Outpacing the Possibilities. Because of its direct linkage to developments
in the California electricity market, we are making the report available to
you as well. Please direct any questions or comments about the report to Ron
Gold at (212) 686-6808, ext. 326 or rgold@pira.com <mailto:rgold@pira.com> .

Recently, EMIS clients received a report dealing with ozone transport and
NOx price issues in the Eastern part of the country entitled, &Upwind8 and
&Downwind8: Ozone Transport and NOx Price Issues. Non-EMIS clients
interested in the report can purchase it for $2,000. To purchase this
report, please contact  Sande Ubiol at (212) 686-6808, ext. 302 or
sande@pira.com <mailto:sande@pira.com> .

For information about PIRA's Emissions Market Intelligence Services (EMIS)
covering NOx, SOx and global warming, please contact Victoria Watkins at
(212) 686-6808, ext. 315 or vwatkins@pira.com  .

Unauthorized distribution of this report is prohibited.  Copyright
compliance is enforced.

PIRA Electricity Group
 - emissionsinsocal.pdf


I just sold David Scott 170 dth of TCO pool at $11.06 for the 22nd (deal
542442).  New Power will schedule this gas out of our pool.  Bottom line ,
this is Mikey gas which is different from Jeffy gas.


I spent the last few days with Rod at a CFEE conference, and he is definitely
going to run..he doesn't think that the election will occur until June so we
will at least have him in Sacto until then.  The CFEE conference was the best
that I have ever attended, there were 10 members of the legislature there,
and though the focus was on air quality and power plants, the members were
expressing their frustation with the administration in not looking for
solutions and only pointing fingers..besides contracts and expidited siting,
a large part of the discussion was on educating the public...Senators Kuehl
and Machado are planning on putting together a public service announcement of
some sort  for members to use in their districts on how to conserve
energy..do we have anything that would be helpful?  Dion Aaroner , who chairs
the Assembly Democratic Caucus, and Rod will be doing a briefing for the
members on energy in January, do we have any basic information, like a
glossary of energy terms that I could give her, I will be with her next
Thursday.  Dion is also talking to the speaker today, briefing him on what
the govenor has been doing, and asking him to call the govenor to talk about
changing his tactics.


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Have fun and enjoy yourself.  You need the break after all of your
international travels.

Rick leaves for London on the 6th and will not return to the office until the
20th.  They are skiing the week of March 13th.  I will be in England from
March 9th and will return to the office on March 20th.

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           02/29/2000 03:32 PM

To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Vacation - March 2, 3, and 6th

I will be out of the office on vacation on Thursday, Friday and Monday, March
2, 3, and 6th.  My assistant, Patti Thompson (x39106) will have
telephone and fax numbers for the hotel where I will be staying.  I will be
at Disneyworld with my family and 90 members of my daughter's high
school drill team, so it is not likely that I will be available during the
daytime.  However, I can be contacted at the hotel in the evening, if
needed.

While I am out, please contact the following for any operational needs:

 Brent Price   Business Controller for Natural Gas  x37647

 Kristin Albrecht *   Business Controller for Power   x34763

*  Kristin will be in the office in the morning only on March 6: she will be
in route to Portland in the afternoon.

I will be back in the office on Tuesday, March 7.


Attached is a draft of the Consent to Assignment and Agreement relating
to the transfer of certain turbine contracts into the TurboPark
structure.  Please note that the attached is being distributed in
advance of review by Enron and remains subject to its comments in every
respect.

Regards, <<GE Consent to Assignment.DOC>>

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.

 - GE Consent to Assignment.DOC


Thanks - guess you are still in the office, will call very soon.

Jane McBride
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Japan Corp.

Otemachi 1st Square Bldg.
West 11th Floor
1-5-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-0004
Japan

URL:        www.enron.co.jp

Tel.:       81-3-5219-4500 (Main)
            81-3-5219-4553 (Direct)
Fax:        81-3-5219-4510

Assistant (Maggy Yamanishi)
Tel.:       81-3-5219-4554
Email:      Yo.Yamanishi@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/09/2000 09:14 AM

		 To: Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA issues

Jane:  the ISDA jurisdiction and waiver of jury trial language is fine.  Sara


Any idea where this stands?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Friedman, Richard
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	American Airlines ISDA

Has anything happened on this? Has credit ever responded to you?

Rich Friedman
Enron Global Markets LLC
richard.friedman@enron.com
713-853-5137


Here are five articles pertaining to Enron and the offer we made in San
Diego. I am looking for others.

Karen Denne remarks in the San Diego Union Tribune that Enron has offered
fixed price contracts and that Enron customers have not been effected by this
price spike. July 25, 2000

The article below states that Enron has put an offer for energy at 5.5
cents/KWh on the table, and others are
expected to provide a variety of possible deals. July 16, 2000 San Diego
Union Tribune (SDUT)

Enron has already made one offer, but the
price is too high and the terms are too long. July 11, 2000 SDUT

The local utility, a unit of Sempra Energy, denied reports yesterday that it
would soon reach an agreement with Enron Corp. on a deal that would lock
in power rates for years for a large segment of its customer base... The
initial offer from Enron was to provide power for four years at 5.5
cents per kilowatt, according to Peace, who emphasized he hoped SDG&E would
receive competing bids from other companies.
Hoge said Enron's track record and the nature of long-term power contracts
made her skeptical that such a deal could save San Diego money.
"With fixed contracts, you always end up paying more than you should on the
other end," she said. "And Enron always has a way to make these contracts
work for them." July 11, 2000 SDUT

Concerning Enron ..."This is no better than a boiler fraud on the people,"
said Harvey
Rosenfield, who unsuccessfully pressed a ballot initiative to overturn
deregulation. "They jack up rates over 200 percent -- then they offer you a
deal at a 50 percent hike.

"I don't think the solution to this problem is to put the people of San
Diego at the mercy of Enron."

Enron is offering to sell San Diego power for four years at 5.5 cents per
kilowatt hour,
according to Peace. The price would be about 50 percent less than current
costs, but more than 50 percent above rates paid as recently as this
spring.


Dear All,

	A new PortCalc executable has been copied to the production environment with the default name ( pwrcalc_slr).

	The old executables have been renamed to pwrcalc_slr.old    and    pwrcalc_slr.old_4191     respectively.

	Please make a trial run with today's Production PortCalc release before the actual final run.

	New Production PortCalc	: version 4.2.0	:	/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr

	[ Change settings in menu    Tools |  Set PortCalc EXE     :

		Choosing  "default ( same as Database)" will utilize the new executable.

	]

	Old Production PortCalc	: version 4.1.9	:	/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.old

	Old Prod Fix PortCalc	: version 4.1.9.1	:	/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.old_4191

	Please let us know if the new production does not work for you.

	This release is based on the Stage release 4.2.0s2 issued on 09/27/2001 with the following changes:

	New Features:

Changes Affecting All:

Asian strip.

	Part I:

Average period more than 1:  curve values are used to calculate the average settlement price for the settled days when settlement price is not yet available.

Average period equals 1: removed a change ( for average period greater than 1 ) that had unexpectedly increased the 2nd order.

Part II:

For Asian option consisting of more than one average period:

Updated the option library so that results tie up with the latest Exotica,  theta in particular.
Prior day results tie up.
A fix on curve shift approved by the Research Group, 2nd order is reasonable now.
Fixed the problem that the option value in front end did not match ad-hoc.
Fixed the value at risk table so that RAC can match ad-hoc.
Fixed the interest rate for option evaluation as that of the expiry date. Fixed the volatility smile.

Index option.

	Part I:

Enable scenario sensitivity calculation for index option.  ( Feature was available in 4.2.0s1.)

Part II:

This version handles the case when the delivery point is in a different region from the settlement price region.    Two things that are not handled in this version : cases when delivery point is in the same region as the settlement price region; and sensitivity scenarios.

Post ID is now stored in the adhoc table.

Changes Affecting Australia:

Curve read even if it is a holiday.

	Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.

	Thanks,

Norman.
x36976

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Sharen:

As we discussed, here is the Del. Pt. language for sales at NP and SP15.  For
any sale beyond April 2002 (not purchases), we might want to use this
language, but only if the trader requests it in a note on the deal entry.  If
the trader does not request it, it is our understanding that you will try to
catch it and notify us to make sure the new language is not desired by the
trader (Use me as a contact and I will ask the trader).  It is understood,
however, that if the trader does not request the language and you do not
catch it the trader bears the risk.

Thanks

Chris


Please notice the time and date change.

Thanks,
Sonia


Ryan,

What's up? Reply to this so I can save you e-mail. I'll write more later.

Chris


PRIORITY EXPRESS MAIL
	 Absolutely FREE Motorola Talkabout Pager
	   You have been selected to receive a FREE MOTOROLA Pager! This side viewable display pager is incredibly small and lightweight.  This incredible MOTOROLA PAGER has a unique, never out of range feature so you will never miss a page.   Call 1(800)761-0511 and Order Your FREE Motorola Pager Today!   This strictly limited-time offer will enable you to stay in touch with family and friends.   There is no mistake.  Your FREE MOTOROLA Pager is waiting for you-but you must respond soon.  If I do not hear from you within 7 days this offer will go to someone else. Please do not allow that to happen!   When you call you will receive a BRAND NEW PAGER in your choice of color and already programmed with a local telephone number in just a few days!   P.S.  This may be your final notice regarding the FREE MOTOROLA Pager.

     		 *   Put your email address in body of email to get removed.


Attached is an update of my 2000 Objectives and the accomplishments
outside of the objectives.


No, contact Rosalee Fleming (ken's assistant).  I let her know that you would
be preparing the briefing.

Ricardo Charvel@ENRON
08/03/2000 08:30 PM
To: Steve Kean, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Lay-Fox meeting

Do we have an estimated deadline for presenting the info to Ken Lay?

Please let me know.

Ricardo


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
07:33 AM ---------------------------

Robin Rodrigue
02/28/2001 06:38 AM
To: Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VAR

EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/27/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/27/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/27/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 881,664.
2/27/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 177,139.
2/27/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 984,782


agree guys are short h/j.  hard to see a big move with cash/futures trading
flat.  agree that it has some squeeze potential though.  Started moving today
as, simultaneously, march started running up and j aron won a big customer
deal.  customer, maybe a hedge fund, bot 1000+ jv 450 puts.  weather
frustrating me too.  a little long but it's in the backs so I haven't been
hurt.  Sure would be nice to get some more weather and have this thing start
going crazy again.  Seen liquids processing come back on at these levels.
Would guess more than 50% has from peak.  Industrial demand different story.
industrial economy just so weak that many petchems and others are burning
less because of their markets, not fuel costs.  Chrystler is a prime
example.   Any switching back to gas from industrial or switching back to
domestic production from overseas muted by weak economy.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 10:46:50 AM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: h/j

ive been short side just reversed in case weather-plus i think everyone and
his
brother short h/j agree? mite take a loss on it but seems low risk next day or
two from 45 cts. this weather pissing me off tho. you see much industrial
demand
and changeover in fuel switching t this feb -mar px level? my sources saying
yes. hope all is well. talk soon


Thanks very much.


Louise,

Intellor Group is pleased to announce the addition of three virtual classroom courses in a first time offering by William McKnight, a leader in Data Warehousing.

Use the following link to get a $100 coupon, making these courses so affordable, you can't pass them by.  Coupons are limited, so please don't take a coupon unless you think you'll be able to attend a session this week.

To get your coupons now, visit: http://www.intellor.com/education/channels/?aid=24&source=nll

Each 2 hour session is live and interactive!  Don't miss this chance to have your questions answered on how to make your data warehouse a success!

Attaining and Measuring Data Warehouse ROI
Calculate ROI to show how valuable your data warehouse really is!
Wednesday, February 6th at 1 PM EST
More course info: http://www.intellor.com/links/?pg=ewm2c

Data Warehousing Success through Best Practices
Learn the best practices for your data warehouse to make it a success!
Thursday, February 7th at 1:30 PM EST
More course info: http://www.intellor.com/links/?pg=ewmc

What to do to get a Data Warehouse Up in 4 weeks
Learn how to build a data warehouse on the fast track!
Friday, February 8th at 1 PM EST
More course info: http://www.intellor.com/links/?pg=ewm3c

To get your coupons now, visit: http://www.intellor.com/education/channels/?aid=24&source=nll

Unable to attend?  Please forward this email to a friend!


I've attached the Work Request for the above effort. Please check it over
to be sure it contains all the information we discussed.

The question marks (???) must be filled in with the names of the people
responsible:

     Requestor is the person who will maintain contact with the CSC Project
Manager concerning issues, timelines, status, etc.

     Alternate requestor is a person who has the authority to answer
questions in the Requestor's absence.

     The Business Owner is the person who can authorize this project to
move forward.

When it meets your approval and the ???'s are all replaced, the request
should be sent to Jackie Jackson for submittal to CSC. Please CC: me on
that email.

Please let me know if there are any questions.

--Steve

(See attached file: WR Power Banded Pricing Historical.doc)


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 03:00 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Miremadi, Ali" <AMiremadi@caiso.com>
12/24/2000 09:19 PM

To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc: ISO Client Relations <ISOClientRelations@caiso.com>
Subject: DOE Certification for Monday, December 25

ATTACHED, FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY IS THE DOE CERTIFICATION LETTER ISSUED
DECEMBER 24th for OPERATING DAY DECEMBER 25, 2000.

PLEASE NOTE - THE RESOURCE INFORMATION REQUEST, REFERENCED IN THE
CERTIFICATION, WAS DIRECTED ONLY TO SPECIFIC ISO MARKET PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARILY LOCATED NORTH OF THE ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION PATH 15.

UNLESS YOUR REAL-TIME OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT RECEIVED A SPECIFIC E-MAIL AND
FOLLOW-UP TELEPHONE CONFIRMATION, NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED AT THIS
TIME.

THE INTENT OF THIS GENERAL MARKET DISTRIBUTION IS FOR INFORMATION AND NOTICE
ONLY.

PLEASE DIRECT ANY QUESTIONS TO YOUR RESPECTIVE ISO CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE.

 <<001224 Certification Ltr__.doc>>  <<001224 Analysis Load_A.doc>>

Ali Miremadi
(916) 608-7061

 - 001224 Certification Ltr__.doc
 - 001224 Analysis Load_A.doc


Joe,

Thanks for your message. It would be difficult to rearrange  the meeting at
this point, given that it was
timed around the availability of Jeff Skilling. I doubt we could get Jeff for
any other date at this point. We can still adjust
the agenda to discuss and address the Content Services issues. I shall work
on this with John and Ravi.

Vince

From: Joe Hirko@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/29/2000 02:24 PM PST
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Research and EBS Engineering and Operations Group
Technical Forum

I could probably make Friday but would have to leave that night.  Any chance
it could be moved to the first of the next week.

Also, I think it is important that as we examine the technical issue of our
network and network functionality that we balance the meeting with the
Content Services issues and requirements.  I talked to John about this
already.

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	03/27/00 02:58 PM

		 To: Joe Hirko/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griebling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Enron Research and EBS Engineering and Operations Group Technical
Forum

Joe,

I would like to invite you to an off-site meeting of John Griebling's
organization
and the Research Group.

Date:   April 27 - April 29
Location:  Breckenridge, Colorado

As you know, John Griebling is managing the network design and construction
project
currently under way in EBS. The Research Group is actively involved in this
effort
which requires advanced quantitative skills in the area of stochastic
optimization and
stochastic processes (for modeling and forecasting Internet traffic flows).

The objective of this meeting is to develop common language and accomplish
transfer
of skills between the two groups, to facilitate cooperation on this project
in the future.

We are inviting Ken Rice and Kevin Hannon to this meeting. We would
appreciate if you could
speak, together with Kevin and Ken, on strategic directions of EBS. It is
important for a group
of technical people, with relatively specialized technical skills, to
understand the big picture.

I am attaching the preliminary agenda for this meeting.

Vince Kaminski


10/29 - As per Tracy this meeting will canceled. She and Rod will meet with Stan.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
02/06/2001 06:52 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: QK1706.1

Hi guys,

Just wanted to let you know that this deal needs to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book right away as all Dynegy Canada deals
need to settle with ECC, not ENA.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Thanks
Stacey


Cate,

 I could make the Atlanta conference on Oct. 2 - 3.  The presentation would
be similar to the one I am going to do in Sept. would that be a problem?
Actually, I thought the Sept. conference was aimed at this type of crowd as
well.

Mike McConnell

"Cate Ambrose" <CateAmbrose@economist.com> on 06/30/2000 03:46:55 PM
To: mike.mcconnell@enron.com
cc:
Subject: The Economist E-Business Summit

Dear Mike:

On behalf of The Economist Group, I have the pleasure of inviting you to
participate as a key presenter at our second US E-Business Summit in October
2000.

The Economist's US e-business series was founded in March 2000 with Summits
in New York and Laguna Niguel California, and with the subtext "Strategic
business transformation for chief executives in the digital economy".

I am aware that you attended the event in Laguna Niguel, where John Chambers,
Dan Nordstrom, and Kevin O'Connor were among the speaker faculty.

The fall E-Business Summits are scheduled for October 2nd-3rd at the JW
Marriott in Atlanta, and October 18th-19th at the Ritz-Carlton in Chicago. I
have attached preliminary drafts of the programme for both cities, which
reflect a session dedicated to Enron Net Works.

We are particularly interested in including a presentation on how Enron has
leveraged core competencies to take on a new role in the Internet economy,
including the Net Works initiative to create B2B websites for other
businesses and industries. We would be delighted to have you speak on this
subject at either the Atlanta or Chicago Summit.

I understand that you have already agreed to participate as a speaker in the
21st Century Internet Summit that will take place September 20-22 in Laguna
Niguel CA. That event, which has been organised by my colleague Lisa Weiner,
is targeted to an audience of CIOs in its focus on technology, whereas the
E-Business Summit targets CEOs in its emphasis on strategic business
transformation.

Thank you for your consideration of this invitation and I look forward to
following up with you following the holiday weekend.

Best regards,
Cate Ambrose
Director of Programmes
212.554.0659

 - programAt.doc
 - programCh.doc


Gerald-

I have the Lost Creek Members Meeting tomorrow.  What's your schedule later
in the week?  Are we busy people, or what?

Take Care,

Audrey


Ted tells me you guys have already taken action on this which greatly relieves me. I did not want this procrastinated on. I have a meeting scheduled with Rick Causey and will get up to speed on what exactly what has transpired prior to that meeting. Thanks for giving this your immediate attention. Rick


Thanks again for your help this weekend.  I enjoyed hanging out with you.
PL


From the same list of original 11/30 East and West post ids, can you obtain the total number of deals in all of the calcs?!  (i.e. one grand total of transactions for the East and West)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pearce, Barry
Sent:	Thursday, January  17, 2002 3:23 PM
To:	Abel, Chris; Evans, Casey
Cc:	Albrecht, Kristin
Subject:	RE: information for the creditors committee

What we want is active transactions, hence, how many deals do we have in the book as of 11/30?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abel, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:44 PM
To:	Pearce, Barry
Subject:	FW: information for the creditors committee

I thought I could answer this question.  Can you provide more clarity?

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Casey
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:06 PM
To:	Abel, Chris
Subject:	RE: information for the creditors committee

no, that can't be right, hence "clear as mud".  we can have an "open" position overall with a counterparty or overall with a region, but there is no such thing as an "open" transaction?!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abel, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, January  17, 2002 11:32 AM
To:	Evans, Casey
Subject:	RE: information for the creditors committee

define it as open positions.  if you have a long and a short offsetting with a counterparty, then there is not an open transaction.

clear as mud?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Casey
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:28 AM
To:	Abel, Chris
Subject:	RE: information for the creditors committee

how have we decided to define "open" transactions?!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abel, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, January  17, 2002 11:03 AM
To:	Wilson, Shona; Albrecht, Kristin; Mills, Scott; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Keiser, Kam; Evans, Casey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Stevens, Martha; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Horn, Cindy; Oliver, David; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, D. Todd; Prejean, Frank; Swinney, John; Best, John; Thomas, Sheri; Moscoso, Michael E.; Hanson, Kristen J.; Mao, Shari; Miralles, Albert; Loibl, Kori; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Thurbin, Simon
Cc:	Thapar, Raj; Pearce, Barry; Hall, Bob M; Beck, Sally; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan
Subject:	RE: information for the creditors committee

FYI- The request in the attachment for "Number of Active Transactions as of 11/30"  should actually read, "Number of Active Counterparties as of 11/30".  I hope this helps clarify the request.

Thanks,
Chris

 << File: booket info needed.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:49 PM
To:	Albrecht, Kristin; Mills, Scott; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Keiser, Kam; Evans, Casey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Stevens, Martha; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Horn, Cindy; Oliver, David; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, D. Todd; Prejean, Frank; Swinney, John; Best, John; Thomas, Sheri; Moscoso, Michael E.; Hanson, Kristen J.; Mao, Shari; Miralles, Albert; Loibl, Kori; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian; Thurbin, Simon
Cc:	Thapar, Raj; Pearce, Barry; Hall, Bob M; Beck, Sally; Abel, Chris; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan
Subject:	information for the creditors committee

As we discussed yesterday, here is the list of information that we need to gather to put into the booklets.  Please give us information (Chris, Keith, Susie, Susan and me) information as you get it.  The first priority is the rolls supporting the DPR information.  Also, please remember that all information needs to be reconciled to DPR information.  Please let Chris, Keith & myself know of your time frame to get us this info.  Currently, expectations are that we should have at least the rolls by the end of the week this week.

 << File: booket info needed.xls >>

Thanks

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


Rogers

I'd like to package the gas needs with the power needs for broker data.  Let's discuss on Tuesday where you're leaning for power.

Thanks

KC


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:
Task Due On:		8/4/2000
Task Start Date:	9/19/1998


Debroah,

My guests for the fall luncheon will be:
	Mary Fischer
	Carol Sapp
	Christina Topol
	Patty Lee
	Rhonda Ryan
	Carol Kenny
	Becky Rush
	Susan Murray
	Leesa White
	Sue Knight

Thanks for all your help.

Mary S. Fischer


Please see the attached memo that Steve Kean sent to Ken Lay regarding the
WSJ article on Mark to Market Accounting.


Please find attached our list of pending agreements and priorities.

Let me know of any updates to this list.

Thanks,
Aneela
---------------------- Forwarded by Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
08:50 AM ---------------------------

Aneela Charania
02/07/2001 10:21 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Financial Trading Legal Documents

Per our conversation yesterday, please find attached our list of pending
agreements and priorities.

Please let me know if you have any comments or updates.

Thanks,
Aneela


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 07:03
PM ---------------------------

Rousseau Anai@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/18/2000 06:37 PM
To: Mark Taylor@ECT
cc:
Subject: Password Application

Mark

In your FAQ, you might like to outline the contract structure in some detail,
for eg:

* the counterparty contracts with Enron North America re: PA
* contracts with ENA re: ETA and
* contracts with Singapore re: GTC

Was there any particular reason that you chose the PA to be with ENA rather
than Enron Japan.  Note, Australia was done for the Australian market.

I would prefer to change it to Enron Japan. Will we have to receive further
external advice? If not, I will change it accordingly.

Regards
Rousseau


Hi Vince,
How are you?  Everything is going well here in Boston.  I am staying very busy in school with the core business classes.  I am taking an intro to Finance with Myers which is very good, but otherwise my classes are very fundamental.  I'm finding the most challenging part of business school is juggling all the extracurricular activities.
Today we kicked off our first official team project which is very similar to the Tiger projects at Wharton that we worked on last spring.  We have a lot of flexibility with the topic of the project.  We are just supposed to find a real company or business unit that will let us analyze a recent, ongoing, or anticipated change initiative.  All that is required is that the initiative be important to the company, represent a change, and have organizational implications.  I don't know if you or a business unit of Enron you know of would like some free consulting in this area, but if so I would love a chance to talk with you about it.
Another group of us are starting an Energy and Environmental Finance Club this year.  We've collected over $3,000 for the club from about 100 MBA and Manufacturing students, and we will get more from the school.  We would like to bring in speakers from the industry to tell us about new initiatives and the state of the business.  Would you or someone you know be interested in presenting to the club?  The students would really appreciate your involvement.
Please feel free to forward this email to whomever you think may be interested in these projects.  I will try calling later this week to touch base and see how everything is in Houston.  See hello to Shirley and everyone else for me.
ken


Can you meet with me before you head back to London?  I am on 27.

I am not sure exactly what happened today but it sounds like a shutdown but you want to stay with EGM and sell things we have geared up at Net Works to sell as well?

I am at 713-853-6635.

GP


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/25/2001 11:18 AM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/25/2001 07:38 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis

Attached, please find a transcript from Governor Davis' press conference
regarding DWR's RFB.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0019274483.0980440259@@@@&BV_EngineID=daljlleidjmbemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_01/20010124_pr01035_transcrip
t_DWR_Press_Conf.html&sTitle=TRANSCRIPT+OF+GOVERNOR+DAVIS+WITH+DEPARTMENT+OF+W
ATER+RESOURCES+OFFICIALS&iOID=13121


If any of you plan to send this newsletter for external distribution than the following disclaimer needs to be attached to it

Enron Industrial Markets and its affiliates are engaged in the trading of forest products and related commodities, and swaps, options, forwards and other derivatives on such commodities, for their own accounts and such trading could affect the markets for or prices of such commodities or derivatives.  The markets for and prices of such commodities and derivatives could also be affected by a variety of other factors, including supply and distribution factors, activities of other market participants and economic conditions generally.  Enron Industrial Markets and its affiliates assume no liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any information contained herein or for ensuring that any such information is current or updated.  The views set forth herein are intended solely for the personal use of the recipient, should not form the principal basis for any investment or trading decision and are not intended as advice or as a recommendation or solicitation of any transaction.  The user is solely responsible for any investment or trading decisions made on the basis of this information.  The information set forth herein is subject to change without notice at any time.

thanks,
Monika Causholli


please block off on my calendar
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 07:35 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	12/01/2000 02:56 PM

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew
S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, G G
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Beena Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane
Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa
Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tori L
Wells/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy McMahon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine
Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona
Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Connie Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie
Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Adams/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brenda
Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: The Enron Corporate Policy Committee Retreat

Ken and Jeff have decided that the Enron Executive Committee Retreat will
include only the Corporate Policy Committee this year.  (See list of members
below.)  You may be holding the timeframe of January 16-18, 2001 on your
calendar, which you can now free up if you are not on the committee.

The location of the retreat is under consideration.  When a decision is made,
we will get the information to the members of the Corporate Policy
Committee.  Departure for the retreat will be early afternoon on Tuesday,
January 16 with return to Houston late afternoon on Thursday, January 18.

Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions at 713-853-6088.

Rosie

Enron Policy Committee

Baxter, Cliff
Causey, Rick
Derrick, Jim
Fastow, Andy
Frevert, Mark
Hannon, Kevin
Horton, Stan
Kean, Steve
Lay, Ken
Pai, Lou
Rice, Ken
Skilling, Jeff
Whalley, Greg


Mark & Vicki:  Attached is a brief e-mail from one of my partners in SF about
a possible LeBoeuf engagement in CA that I did not think would create any
issues, but which I just wanted to run by you in light of the entire CA
situation.  I also wanted to make sure that US Windpower is not affiliated
with Enron Wind.  Essentially, we would be representing a court appointed
trustee sought by a number of project lenders that desire to cause the sale
of an independent wind power facility since those lenders have not been
paid.  I assume that the lenders have not been paid since PG&E has failed to
make power purchase payments to the project owner.  My understanding is that
we would only become involved if the lender group is successful in having a
trustee appointed and that we would not be involved in any dispute or
proceedings relating to the appointment of the trustee.  We would handle the
transactional work resulting from the sale of the project to a third party
buyer.  At this point, I would not see us handling any litigation against
PG&E.  I would circle back with you first if we were asked to do this to make
sure that, at such time,  it did not create any problems.  Could you let me
know whether you have any concerns with this representation?  As usual,
thanks for your consideration.  John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 19:00:16 -0400
From: "BENNETT G. YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>
To: "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
Subject: US Windpower
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

John,

As we discussed, we have been asked to represent Susan Uecker as the proposed
receiver for Windpower Partners 1989 Limited Partnership, a California
limited partnership.  Windpower Partners operates a windpower electrical
generation facility in Altamont Pass, California.  The general partner of
Windpower Partners is US Windpower, Inc.  The plant is operated by FORAS
Service Corporation.  As far as I can tell, US Windpower is not an Enron
entity.

The project lenders are State Street Bank as indenture trustee for Household
Commercial; John Hancock Mutual Insurance; Cigna; Connecticut General; Life
Insurance Co. of North America; Ohio National Life Assurance; and Southern
Farm Bureau Annuity.  I understand that the lenders are owed $40 million.

As I understand it, the lenders want to have a receiver appointed for the
project, with the receiver directed to sell the project.  A receiver takes
possession of property on behalf of the Court and holds it subject to the
Court's direction.  The receiver is, and must remain, a neutral party.  The
receiver is entitled to retain counsel, with counsel paid out of the
receivership assets.  I frequently represent Ms. Uecker in these kinds of
matters, and was told that the lenders encouraged her to retain us in this
matter.

In California, to appoint a receiver, the lender sues the borrower and files
a motion to have the Court appoint a receiver.  Thus, the lender and borrower
litigate the issue of whether a receiver should be appointed, and the
receiver does not get involved unless and until the Court has ruled in the
lenders' favor.

As I understand it, the lenders want the receiver to market the project.
Thus our role would be to (i) make sure the receiver remains neutral, and
(ii) to handle documenting and closing the sale.  I would not anticipate any
significant litigation with the borrower or the lenders, unless the borrower
refused to comply with the Court's order directing it to turnover possession
of property to the receiver.

The borrower undoubtedly is a creditor of PG&E.  I was told that the lenders
do not want the receiver to go after PGE at this time, but view that as an
issue for the buyer.

Please let me know if you have any concerns with us undertaking this
representation.

Ben Young


For your background and heads-up, we understand that the U.S. Senate is very
close to agreement on a pipeline safety bill and it may be voted on by the
full Senate as early as Wednesday evening.  Although this bill pre-dates the
pipeline explosion in New Mexico and is not directly linked to it, the
tragedy seems to have hastened the progress of this proposed bill.  We
suspect that when approved in the Senate, this bill may draw press coverage
and create some headlines, though the focus of the media attention and the
reaction of gas trading markets--if any-- sems hard to predict.  One possible
"market-moving" aspect of this legislation may be the announced increased
costs that will need to be borne by pipeline operators in the future to fund
new R&D and new safety measures.

The main points of this bill are:

The bill would impose several new requirements on pipeline operators
regarding inspection methods and community "right to know."  The language
specifically allows for "periodic assessment of the integrity of the pipeline
through methods including internal inspection, pressure testing, direct
assessment, or other effective methods."

The bill would allow greater state authority over interstate pipes, with
coordination between state and local officials and the Office of Pipeline
Safety.  OPS will remain the controlling authority in matters of pipeline
safety.

It would provide more R&D money and authorize an increase in user fees over
the next two years.

Cost assessment:  the legislation will increase operators' day-to-day costs
and impose greater user fees.   Based on the calls for greater R&D, and for
better OPS/DOT inspection capabilities in the future, we can expect
appropriations in the next few fiscal years to be targeted for substantial
increases -- most of which will come out of user fees paid by pipelines.

Political assessment:   Apparently the changes made to the bill in recent
weeks reflect a number of the arguments Enron has been making in negotiations
to make the McCain bill more palatable.  Even in the face of the El Paso
incident, the Enron Political Affairs staff has reportedly been able to make
meaningful changes to what was previously an unacceptable piece of
legislation.  In the assessment of the Enron DC office, it is certainly in
the best interests of the industry to lobby for its passage, given the
political uncertainties of a new Congress in 2001 -- it would not be
beneficial to have to re-start our negotiations from scratch next year.

In the House of Representatives:  The House has its own pipeline safety bill
pending.  It remains to be seen whether the leadership will push for this
bill (which will require reconciliation with the Senate bill before it can
become a law), or whether the House will just adopt the bill that comes out
of the Senate.  With only about four weeks left in the congressional session,
final passage of a bill out of Congress will likely come only at the end of
the session in October.


David, further to our conversation, can you advise on the history of an ex employee named Steve Horn.  I believe he came from the the Finance group.

I would appreciate any off the record comments you can provide. My phone number is 3-1587.

BT


Michael and JB,

Please note for inclusion in pro-formas.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Asante, Ben
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Gadd, Eric
Cc:	Reinecke, Bryan
Subject:	O&M costs

Eric,
The O&M costs seem reasonable.
The pipe O&M is usually very very low compared to that of compression.
Since the pipe is about 80% of the total capex, the composite effect the total O&M per total capital tends to be very small (1.1% in this case).

Within ETS, the pipe O&M is typically $500-600/mile/year
The non-fuel O&M is about $35/HP/year.
If we use these benchmarks we come in lower than their estimates.
Martin Donnelly has confirmed that fuel is not included in this estimate.. it is captured in the toll.

Please let me know if you require further detail.
ben


any luck on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 11:18 AM
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
08/04/2000 08:43 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: new counterparties for EOL?

Bob - please pursue, you will need to talk to Mark Taylor as there were
regulatory issues with the funds.

Thanks Mark  - we'll pursue - hope things are well with you too.  All is
going fine here.

Mark Schroeder
03/08/2000 03:49
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: new counterparties for EOL?

Louise - I think that John indicated to me that he had or would be suggesting
to you that hedge funds might be a group of counterparties to get online with
EOL.  I have also suggested to John, and pass along to you now, an
additional/different group.  Lately, I have been receiving proxies from a
number of the mutual funds (the equivalent of your unit trusts and investment
trusts in the UK) I own (some with the Fidelity funds family in Boston, some
with the AIM funds, based in Houston [but with a UK parent]), seeking (and
receiving) shareholder authorisation to trade in commodities.  Particularly
given the cost pressures on mutual funds these days, the low-cost option of
EOL would seem a good product for them.  Anyway, in the event that you had
not targetted this potentially large number of counterparties and funds, I
wanted to pass along this suggestion/idea.  Hope all is going well.  mcs


i was only kidding, i will give you a call

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:16 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

we will go from there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:15 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ok, but why the bar you cant drink

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:16 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Call me when you get done getting your hair cut

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:14 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

deal

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:15 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'll meet you in the bar when I get out of here

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:14 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

cp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

which next door?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

um, how about next door

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know, where do you have in mind

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

it will probably take me until then, so where should we meet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm going to shoot for 3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

what time do you think

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you're going to be done before I can get off

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i think now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know...when are you getting your haircut?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

so i have to go get my haircut, any ideas where we can meet


Guys, I spoke with Mark this morning.  He is very supportive of the structure
and idea.  I had indicated that he would continue to run the producer
services business in the West but would also be part of the overall team as
we plot out strategy in the West.  He wants to stay in Denver which I think
we should be able to accomodate as long as his group stays integrated into
the overall team.  I had indicated that we would consolidate market making
into Houston and Paul Lucci could decide if he wants to continue trading or
not - if so he needs to move to Houston.

 Phillip/Barry, go ahead and start working with Mark as you develop your
plans going forward.  I will be speaking to Stephanie Miller this week and
will give the green light with her shortly.

Regards
Delainey


You need to take that draft to bank by tomorrow.  Mom got a voice mail saying
that they will need to reissue the
draft if we all have not signed by tomorrow.

Call if you have questions
713 853 4723
713 365 9035


I will be in Jacksonville Florida this week negotiating a transaction with
New Jersey Natural Gas.  It is a project development deal utilizing fuel
cells.  The commercial lead is Jeff Ader.  I will leave tomorrow afternoon,
returning on Friday afternoon.

Kay


If you no longer would like to receive email from Kase, please reply with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line

      Kase Logo

Learn Technical Analysis
Two Full Days
 July 17-18, 2001
Early Bird Discount until June 14, 2001
Houston, Texaswww.kaseco.com

Energy Traders, Marketers and Buyers.
This two full day class serves as both an introduction to those new to technical analysis and a refresher for experienced traders.  Technicals are taught in a logical, systematic manner        oriented to equip both physical and paper traders to buy low, sell high and manage risk in the real world in a logical, methodical manner.
In this class you will:

? Ascertain when and how to take profit and cut losses.
? Find out how to set up a strategy by identifying probable market direction and turns as well as likely targets using chart patterns.
? Learn to use both traditional indicators like moving averages and stochastics, as well the state-of-the-art methods which won Cynthia Kase the coveted Market        Technicians Association's "Best of the Best" award.

Content

? Charting Basics, Types of Charts, Support and Resistance
? When to Buy or Sell (Entry Techniques)
? When to Exit Based on Signals (Momentum and Divergence)
? How to Exit Based on Stops (Managing Trade Risk)
? Chart Patterns and Forecasting Basics (Candlesticks, Elliott  Wave, Flags, etc.)
? Statistical Hedging

Registration Fees Include a Copy of Cynthia Kase's acclaimed book "Trading with the Odds"      Fees Location and Hotel About the Presenters Who Should Attend Detailed Agenda and Schedule Custom Classes
Chart
*** Register Now! ***
For more information log on to www.kaseco.com  or contact me directly at the Email or phone numbers shown below.
Jennifer Smith
Kase and Company, Inc.jennifersmith@kaseco.com
505-237-1600 voice
505-237-1659 fax

    Early Bird For
July 17-18 is June 14, 2001
[IMAGE]
Early Bird Special:  $845.00
 	Two or More Early Bird:  $795.00
Regular: $995.00
Two or More: $895.00
    REGISTER NOW!!!

Marriott West Loop
1750 West Loop South Houston, TX 77027
1-800-613-3982 Reservations by Phone
1-713-624-1517 Reservations by Fax
Room Rate: $139.00 per night
Please Mention that you are attending the Kase and Company Seminar.
     Back to Links


do we need bus cards
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:28 AM -----

	Enron Messaging Administration
	10/12/2000 07:16 PM

		 To: WeAreOne3
		 cc:
		 Subject: "We are one @enron.com!" : FINAL NOTICE.

Please be aware that the following internet domains for messaging will be
decommissioned on
OCTOBER 14, 2000 :

@ect.enron.com
@ei.enron.com
@enron.co.uk

After OCTOBER 14, 2000, internet emails addressed to employees using the
above internet domain names will be no longer be delivered.
Please note that this applies to Enron employees worldwide.

All employees must now use their @enron.com internet address.

Some employees are still receiving internet email, primarily subscriptions to
internet-based news/update services, addressed to their @ect.enron.com,
@ei.enron.com or @enron.co.uk email address.   As mails to these addresses
will no longer be delivered after OCTOBER 14, 2000 please contact the service
providers to specify your new @enron.com internet address.

Any employees who are aware of the following should contact the Resolution
Center on ext. 31411 immediately :
 Applications/processes using @ect.enron.com, @ei.enron.com or @enron.co.uk
internet addresses
 Distribution groups being addressed via the internet using @ect.enron.com,
e.g. Enron.London.Developers@ect.enron.com

Please direct any questions to the Resolution Center at ext. 31411.

Thanks for your cooperation.
Enron Messaging Administration


Attached please find a final copy of EOTT's Form 10-Q/A for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2000.

(See attached file: EOTT Energy 10-Q 1stqtr finaldist.doc)
 - EOTT Energy 10-Q 1stqtr finaldist.doc


Kay,

The cost is $55 for a CT correspondent to search the docket for
motions/orders relating to CES or US Telenet; plus $2/page for all
matters copied.  Should we proceed with the search?

Regards,
Sherry

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Ward, Sharon
Subject: RE: Ces lease/USTELENET DMS

Thanks.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
stacey.bolton@enron.com <mailto:stacey.bolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Shah, Chandra" <chandra_shah@nrel.gov>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:11 PM
To:	'stuleja@alternatepower.com'; 'fhoey@alternatepower.com'; 'jpalexander@aep.com'; 'mbabcock@powerdirect.com'; 'clanage@alleghenyenergy.com'; 'bobrien@allenergy.com'; 'wchapman@allenergy.com'; 'ecellar@energy.com'; 'jirving104@aol.com'; 'pweller@electric.com'; 'rmaynard@electric.com'; 'ecandelas@electric.com'; 'tmurphy@electric.com'; 'fbloom@electric.com'; 'hgenter@electric.com'; 'jmays@electric.com'; 'brent.alderfer@worldnet.att.net'; 'brent.beerley@newwindenergy.com'; 'eblank@lawfund.org'; 'huntoon@home.com'; 'Scarraher@edisonmission.com'; 'tbrown@energyatlantic.com'; 'nsadawi@aol.com'; 'rring@enron.com'; 'sunneet_sharma@enron.com'; 'bhatch@enron.com'; 'sbolton@enron.com'; Mainzer, Elliot; 'david.braun@exeloncorp.com'; 'ellen.plebani@exeloncorp.com'; 'colec@firstenergycorp.com'; 'mebolan@firstenergycorp.com'; 'mlmoore@firstenergycorp.com'; 'metcalfj@firstenergycorp.com'; 'wbyrne@forenergy.com'; 'ddyc@go-green.com'; 'egardow@gpu.com'; 'jtorpey@gpu.com'; 'johnz@northeastwind.com'; 'osowskm@bp.com'; 'tom.rawls@greenmountain.com'; 'brian.killkelley@greenmountain.com'; 'hitt@greenmountain.com'; 'gillan.taddune@greenmountain.com'; 'smccorry@mackservicesgroup.com'; 'lpeterson@newenergy.com'; 'arichards@newenergy.com'; 'dbaker@newenergy.com'; 'mfederle@nechoice.com'; 'kloebs@newenergy.com'; 'belgiovineja@nmenergy.com'; 'bocchicchioja@nmenergy.com'; 'johnsontl@nmenergy.com'; 'murray.paterson@ontariopowergeneration.com'; 'brogers@pepcoenergy.com'; 'amoyad@pepcoenergy.com'; 'sboyle@pepcoenergy.com'; 'dtbobb@pplweb.com'; 'sagabrielle@pplweb.com'; 'carol_hazlett@pseg.com'; 'michael_mandzik@pseg.com'; 'dvanpelt@reliantenergy.com'; 'metscjp@nu.com'; 'gilbedj@nu.com'; 'flahet@nu.com'; 'tcarroll@sel.com'; 'rswhitt@tmlp.com'; 'emongeon@vppsa.com'; 'shall@vppsa.com'; 'fsg@wpsenergy.com'; 'johnjay@wpsenergy.com'; 'mrucker@apx.com'; 'dfoley@apx.com'; 'jean.wilson@pacificorp.com'; 'barrett.stambler@pacificorp.com'; 'Jean.Hopkins@gen.pge.com'; 'muir.davis@neg.pge.com'; 'sancha.huang@pgees.com'; 'edmund.jones@pgees.com'; 'dan_gustafson@vapower.com'; 'jmarez@powersavers.com'; 'eglpwr@gte.net'; 'nstarling@edison-source.com'; 'ronorozco@energiatotal.com'; 'sjl@friendlypower.com'; 'mtserhan@newwestenergy.com'; 'powercominc@earthlink.net'; 'info@mypower.com'; 'awayne@utilisource.com'; 'enoojibail@aol.com'; 'dgreenberg@ascensiontech.com'; 'bill.moore@atlantic-renewable.com'; 'Sam.Enfield@atlantic-renewable.com'; 'Theo.deWolff@atlantic-renewable.com'; 'biomassgp@aol.com'; 'aeingram1@bpa.gov'; 'angusduncan@BonEnvFdn.org'; 'RobHarmon@b-e-f.org'; 'Harley@endlessenergy.com'; 'Bill.Behling@energydi.com'; 'eeco@eeco.net'; 'alden@ert.net'; 'gwhinc@worldnet.att.net'; 'gpd@gpdnet.com'; 'danvalianti@aol.com'; 'aranger@gpdnet.com'; 'frankha@ifc.utc.com'; 'mskelly@internationalwind.com'; 'oceanranch@altavista.com'; 'mbronez@powerlight.com'; 'PVTL2@aol.com'; 'tleyden@powerlight.com'; 'lgwin@powerlight.com'; '3125275790@email.msn.com'; 'lkocher@scseng.com'; 'lwilkenson@scsengineers.com'; 'jwalsh@scsengineers.com'; 'Jennifer.Wylde@csgrp.com'; 'Steve.Cowell@csgrp.com'; 'john.hoffner@csgrp.com'; 'rowen@chorus.net'; 'jleone1@wm.com'; 'mcrowdis@bellatlantic.net'; 'bgrace@seadvantage.com'; 'jhgordy@snet.net'; 'pepper@cleanpowermarkets.com'; 'erich@sventures.com'; 'john.v.anderson@ctinnovations.com'
Subject:	EPA Houston TX Renewable Request for Information

The EPA Houston, Texas facility has issued a renewable power Request for
Information (RFI).  This RFI is attached and is posted at
http://www.fedbizopps.gov , under Solicitation Number GS-00P-02-BSD-0001.

Responses are due November 9. Respondents to this RFI will be kept informed
of the EPA Houston, TX renewable power purchase plans.

Let me know if you want to be removed from my renewable power purchase
mailing list.

  <<Houston RFI.doc>>

Chandra Shah
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)
1617 Cole Blvd, MS 2723
Golden, CO 80401-3393
303-384-7557
303-384-7411 (fax)
chandra_shah@nrel.gov

 - Houston RFI.doc


Please respond to The Motley Fool
======================== THE MOTLEY FOOL ========================
                   B R E A K F A S T   N E W S
                      Monday, May 14, 2001
benjamin.rogers@enron.com
=================================================================

IN THIS ISSUE
---------------------
- TOP STORY: SCHERING FIGHTING FDA PANEL, MERGER RUMORS
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408419

- NEWS TO GO: NORTEL, SUNTRUST BANKS, AND AT&T
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408420

- HOT TOPICS: EBAY, DISNEY, AND BALLARD POWER
  http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408421

=================================================================
SPONSORED BY: Datek Online
Datek Online. Built to trade. *Proprietary auto routing
technology | *$9.99 commission for online equity trades |
*60-second execution commitment. Apply for a Datek Account
Now!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=408422

"If you give something worth paying for, they'll pay." -- Thomas
Peters

-----------------------------------------------------------------
TOP STORY
-----------------------------------------------------------------

SCHERING FIGHTING FDA PANEL, MERGER RUMORS
It will no doubt be a busy day for investors following
drugmaking Rule Maker Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP), as the
company was thrust into the news for several reasons. First
among them: On Friday, an advisory panel recommended to the FDA
that Schering's Claritin allergy drug -- and similar offerings
from other companies, including Aventis (NYSE: AVE) and Pfizer
(NYSE: PFE), which make for a multibillion-dollar business --
should be cleared for over-the-counter, non-prescription sale.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408423

>>FULL STORY:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408424

-----------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS TO GO
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Canadian networking equipment company Nortel (NYSE: NT) will
lose CEO John Roth to retirement next year. Likely successor and
COO Clarence Chandran, meanwhile, is quitting for medical
reasons, and so Roth will stick around to lead the search for
his replacement.

SunTrust Banks (NYSE: STI) surprised investors by making a $14.7
billion bid for Wachovia (NYSE: WB), which is already betrothed
to First Union (NYSE: FTU). SunTrust's offer is 17% more than
First Union's based on Friday's closing prices for the competing
stock swap bids. For more on the First Union deal, read Brian
Graney's mid-April article.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408425

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A), Warren Buffett's insurance and
investing conglomerate, said first-quarter net earnings per
share were $397, down from $531 last year. Operating earnings,
meanwhile, improved to $462 million from $354 million. The
company's report can be viewed at its website.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=408426

Telecommunications giant AT&T (NYSE: T) reportedly said in an
SEC filing that it will saddle its broadband business unit with
more debt than any of its other units, or approximately $28.4
billion, when it splits into four separate companies later this
year. For more on the company's current exchange offer of shares
of AT&T Wireless (NYSE: AWE), check out Bill Mann's column of
last week.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408427

Pizza mover Papa John's (Nasdaq: PZZA) said April comparable
sales fell 5.3% even as total revenues rose 27%. Last year
comparables rose 7.3%. The company said some of the difference
can be attributed to its anniversary promotion, which ran in Q2
last year but Q1 this time around.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
HOT TOPICS
-----------------------------------------------------------------

EBAY TIGHTENS THE RULES
Fools on the eBay board bid up their thoughts on the company's
new rule to ban links to third-party sites and storefronts.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408428

MY DISNEY INVESTMENT SEEMS GOOFY
This Fool's 1998 investment is worth exactly the same amount
today. Is he alone? Nope. It's a small world, after all.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408429

WILL BALLARD POWER'S FUEL CELLS REALLY WORK?
"If the auto makers thought this technology was so great,
wouldn't they have snatched Ballard Power up some time ago?"
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408430

>>MORE HOT TOPICS
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408431

=================================================================
SPONSORED BY: Datek Online
Datek Online. Built to trade. *Proprietary auto routing
technology | *$9.99 commission for online equity trades |
*60-second execution commitment. Apply for a Datek Account
Now!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=408432
=================================================================

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408433
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408434
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408435
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408436
My Email Settings:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers@enron.com

FAST AND FREE
Grab your new Member Benefits and check out
what's new for you this week.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408437

CHOOSE THE BEST STOCKS FOR YOUR PORTFOLIO
Lean how to evaluate companies in our online seminar.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408438

FOOL DIRECT EMAIL SERVICES
Unsubscribe, change your settings, temporarily suspend mail
delivery:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers@enron.com

EMAIL DISCUSSION BOARD
Let us know what you think of our email products:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=408439

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2001, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-29665-2001-05-14_9-17-04-3342405_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:29:07(5-14-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


I'm at home now....WRITE ME!!!!


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/16/2000 05:57 AM -----

	Shelley Corman
	11/15/2000 08:58 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mkt Affiliate Implications: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha
Facilities Management Responsibilities

Enron Energy Services is presently a marketing affiliate of several of the
Enron pipelines because EES: (1) buys/sells gas; and (2) holds transport
contracts on our pipelines.

Under the FERC's standards of conduct, the pipelines cannot: (1) share
transportation information or shipper information with EES; (2) must function
independently and keep separate books and records.  Generally, I don't see
the FERC having any problem with mechanical, electrical, air-conditioning
types of services.  However; there are 2 specific concerns that arise with
respect to the described arrangement under the FERC's marketing affiliate
standards of conduct:

1. Records -- FERC has ruled that giving a marketing affiliate "access" to
transportation and shipper records (including something as simple as file
room access) is deemed to be impermissibly sharing the information with a
marketing affiliate in violation of the standards. Thus, it seems to me that
EES will explicitly not be able to perform any records management function
for NNG, TW or NBPL.

2. Billing -  FERC scrutinizes intercompany charges carefully.  In a recent
Kinder-Morgan consent order, the FERC used payroll and intercompany charge
records to make the case that the pipeline and marketing affiliate did not
operate separately.  It would be helpful if any EES facility management
charges/allocations come from Enron Facility Services (not EES) --  leaving
us room to argue that the facility management subsidiary involves separate
functions and staff than the EES subsidiary that is a marketing affiliate.

	From:  Steve Kean & Bill Donovan                           11/14/2000 06:36 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Houston
cc:

Subject: Reorganization of Houston and Omaha Facilities Management
Responsibilities

Responsibility  for daily operations of building support services in the
Enron Building, Houston leased offices, and Two Pacific Place (Omaha) will be
transitioning from Corporate to Enron Energy Services (EES) by year-end.  The
areas affected include facility operations and maintenance of mechanical,
electrical, and air-conditioning systems; mail delivery;  housekeeping;
food, copier, and records services.

This transition of services, as presently managed by Enron Property and
Services Corp. (EPSC), is designed to optimize value to Enron,s Business
Units by leveraging facility management businesses now offered by EES to
their commercial customers.  EPSC staff having administrative responsibility
for these services will report to Enron Facility Services, a subsidiary of
EES,s Global Energy Services group led by Daniel Leff, President and CEO.

EPSC is responsible for Enron,s internal real estate and office development
needs, including leasing, space allocations and facility planning, project
and construction management, furniture systems, and office relocation.  EPSC,
in its development role, remains a part of Enron Corporate Administration
Services (ECAS) along with Corporate Security and the Aviation Department,
reporting to Bill Donovan, Vice President, Corporate Administrative Services.

This alignment of responsibilities offers the opportunity for EPSC to focus
resources on effective utilization of our existing office space assets and
managing the development of Houston,s new Enron Center Campus project.


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$PIRATEBOUNTY$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

You could be a $25 Million Winner!
Don't wait, grab your FREE entries to win
$1000's, even millions, in daily, weekly,
and monthly cash prizes!

Click Here:
http://r1.postlite.com/?u=130&l=68&id=159916

 AOL Users Click Here

Thanks,
PirateBounty.com
http://www.piratebounty.com

->>-------------------------------------------------------------<<-
TO UNSUBSCRIBE click here:

http://www.postlite.com/u/?l=piratebounty&e=alewis@ect.enron.com

AOL users click here to unsubscribe

or...

Reply to this email with the word "remove" as the subject.

This email was sent to: alewis@ect.enron.com

X-Postlite-Recipient: alewis@ect.enron.com
X-Postlite-Userid: piratebounty
->>-------------------------------------------------------------<<-


----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:30 PM -----

	Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/16/2001 11:39 AM

		 To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Schaefer/HPL/Enron@Enron, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Research - CA Utilities

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Power, Keith E.
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Schneider, Chip; Tribolet, Michael
Subject: Research - CA Utilities

Comments attached from Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch on events from
yesterday.

? Coram Energy, a small QF, will sign an involuntary bankruptcy petition
against Southern California Edison. A Coram spokesman stated that the
petition is being circulated to five other QFs (which were not named) and
that it could be filed as soon as next week.  If filed, the utilities would
have 20 days to respond, perhaps another 30 days to contest the filing.

? California PUC voted to block Edison and PG&E,s layoff plans.  The ruling
requires the companies to halt planned layoffs and to rescind those already
made.  Edison had cut 400 jobs, with plans to cut 1,450 more.  PGE had laid
off 325, with plans to cut a further 675.

? Proposed QF contract legislation (SB-47X) remains stalled in the State
Senate Energy Committee.  In a perverse and &vicious-circle8 type twist, lack
of QF payments to date have forced many off line, reducing supply and driving
up prices.

? National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,s spring forecast.  The
NOAA reported that the Pacific Northwest has experienced one of the driest
winters on record, second only to 1976-77.  Reservoir levels continued to be
below normal for the end of February and mountain snowpacks in many river
basins are less than 70% of normal.


Here are my thoughts (in redline) for Seabron to consider.  On alot of this,
I don't have a strong opinion.  Seabron, please beef up the analysis related
to the cost/benefit of the dispatcher running the spot market.

Thanks,

Jim


Trailblazer will have an outage starting Tuesday, Feb. 5th. for 4 to 8 days. They are only going to schedule firm on their side during this time which is 522,000 mmbtu/d. This is about 100,000 mmbtu/d less than their capacity.  Also their pressure will be running lower which will be around 625 #  maybe higher.

Gary


dutch.quigley@enron.com   Your Request Has Been Processed  For Your FREE LIFETIME VIP PASS!
		[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]
 LISA  	 CATERINA  	 NIKKI
 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]
 TINA 	 LONNA 	 MELISSA
		     FREE VIP PASS FOR dutch.quigley@enron.com!
		 - The HOTTEST Legal Teens Online - - Over 65,000 XXX Pics - - Thousands of Videos and AVIs - - Live Teen Chat & Sex Shows -  dutch.quigley@enron.com:Click Here For More Details!

		 This is not  Spam!  You are receiving this mailing because  in a horny frenzy you subscribed and confirmed that you wanted it. If you  no longer want to receive Daily XXX Emails and FREE Porn, feel free to  scroll down and  Click on the unsubscribe Link.   Your  Loss!


Following the anticipated completion of the Station 5 maintenance on October
20, 2001, the GTN capacity through Station 8 is being restated.  Beginning
with the Timely cycle for gas day October 21, 2001, and until further
notice, the capacity will be restated to 1,920 MMcf/d through Station 8,
which approximates 2,050 MMcf/d at Kingsgate.  Off-line deliveries upstream
of Station 8 and receipts downstream of Station 8 will not be affected.

For questions and additional assistance, please contact GTN's Gas
Transportation Coordinators at (503) 833-4300, Option 1.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


I'm sorry Sara,  I forgot that your participation is new on this meeting. We
are using the same format as we used on the formerly Chief Counsel Meetings.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Elizabeth.

Sara Shackleton@ECT
25/10/99 12:41
To: Elizabeth Serralheiro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: ESA Legal Management Committee Meeting Reports

Does Randy prefer a particular format?   Sara

Elizabeth Serralheiro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/25/99 06:19 AM
To: John Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Frumkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, vcferraz@elektro.com.br, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA Legal Management Committee Meeting Reports

Please send me your updated report today, not later than 5:00 p.m.

Thanks,
Elizabeth.


Since I will be traveling on Friday - we had to change the conference call on
Thursday 2pm EST...If you are able to participate, please call
1-800-.860-2442  In addition, based on responses received regarding
availability to date, we are tentatively planning to have the working group
meeting in Houston during the week of July 23rd.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
 - Andy Katz.vcf


Darrell,

Grant Masson, Ronnie Chahal and myself made a contribution to the book
on energy derivatives to be published soon in Australia (a book by
Clewlow and Strickland).

Given our growing workload and responsibilities, the quality of the paper is
less
than satisfactory. I would like to make sure that there are no obvious and
embarrassing  errors in what we submit. I would appreciate if you could
take a quick look at the chapter and give us the feedback (under the same
arrangement as in the previous cases).

Thanks for looking at our storage model. I shall give you a call within the
next few days to update you on our work and developments at Enron.
Vince will start his senior year in 6 weeks. He wants to graduate and look
for work: he thinks getting an advanced degree in his field makes
no economic sense. He spent the summer building his
own computer (1000 MHz clock speed). I was the unskilled immigrant worker
toiling under his management.

I hope everything is well at home and that your wife's company is doing great.

Regards.

Vince


of course...

just kidding.  Aldo's next week. you're done.  Open up your checkbook baby.

From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 10/13/2000 03:45 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Last night

am i being ignored?


Peter, I have considered your issue in point three below and, further to our
discussion, I believe that the issue is addressed in Paragraph 8(d) of the
credit support annex.  That paragraph indicates that, upon termination, where
no amounts are payable by Pledgor (the party that has posted collateral) to
Secured Party (the party holding the posted collateral), the Secured Party
will transfer all posted collateral (plus interest if the posted collateral
is cash) to the Pledgor.  Therefore, although in your third example Bow
Valley would be required to post a letter of credit for the $15 million, upon
termination ECC would owe the $240 million to Bow Valley and Paragraph 8(d)
would kick in, such that ECC would be required to return the letter of credit
to Bow Valley and pay the $240 million.  The mechanism set forth in Paragraph
8(d) clearly makes sense in a multi-transaction situation but doesn't really
make sense in this situation, since, in your third example, ECC could call
for a letter of credit from Bow Valley knowing full well that it will never
be able to actually use it, thereby simply making Bow Valley incur the cost
of posting the letter of credit.  However, I think this is a point that we
should leave for the bank to raise, if they are concerned about it.
Practically speaking, I would think that, given these facts, ECC would simply
not call for the letter of credit from Bow Valley in your third example, as
it provides no real protection.

I guess the only other point to be made is that, if the index were to go to a
price of less than $0.25 per GJ, such that the amount owed to Bow Valley
under Swap 1 was reduced from $300 million to less than $15 million, ECC
holding the letter of credit would make sense.

Greg

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           09/20/2000 10:42 AM

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alberta PPA Financing

I want to get a handle on how termination payments are handled vis a vis the
collateral obligations, particularly where the Index moves down relative to
the forward price and its effect on Swap 1.

@ $5.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is no issue.  There is
no collateral obligation and Swap #1 settles at $300MM and Swap #3 settles at
$0.

@ $6.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is $15MM collateral
obligation of ECC to Swapco on Swap #1 and $15MM collateral obligation of RBC
to ECC on Swap #3 each with $45MM collateral threshold, as Swap #1 settles at
$360MM due from ECC to Swapco and Swap #3 settles at $60MM due from RBC to
ECC.  This seems to make sense.  Swapco has a claim against ECC for $360MM
with Enron Corp. Guarantee and $15MM of collateral.  ECC has a claim against
RBC for $60MM with $15MM of collateral.

@ $4.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is $15MM collateral
obligation of Swapco to ECC on Swap #1 and $15MM collateral obligation of ECC
to RBC on Swap #3 each with $45MM collateral threshold, as Swap #1 settles at
$240MM due from ECC to Swapco and Swap #3 settles at $60MM due from ECC to
RBC.  This is where I get lost.  Swapco has a claim against ECC for $240MM
with Enron Corp. Guarantee but has given $15MM of collateral when it owes
nothing.  How is the collateral applied when it owes nothing.  RBC has a
claim against ECC for $60MM with Enron Corp. Guarantee and $15MM of
collateral.  This part seems to make sense.

Somebody smarter than me needs to explain.


Aaron:  You never told me who in London negotiated the EnronCredit.com Ltd.
agreement with Morgan!  I can try to work off of that ISDA.  Thanks.  Sara


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for today.

Robin,  I will send the Benchmark for today's numbers at approx. 7-7:30pm.

Thanks,

Kyle


Here is a summary of AGL prepared by Tom Chapman.

From: James D Steffes on 01/31/2001 10:54 AM
To: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Next Steps for Midwest Gas Strategy

I wanted to follow-up with everyone following yesterday's meeting.

It appears to me that we need to develop (1) a better analysis of the four
market models - AGL (Steve M), Columbia of Ohio (Janine), Socal Gas (Jeff),
NICOR (Roy) - based on some key elements and (2) the key Influence parties in
Illinois with 5 layer Influence Circles that we need to be thinking about in
this discussion.

It would be great if we could get this to Laura for distribution by end of
day Friday (realize it's tight).

Key elements for Market Models --

1. Direct Access Allowed?  For What customers?  What timeline?
2. Upstream Capacity resolution - assignment or otherwise?  Are there assets
left to optimize
3. Retail pricing - Fixed price vs. PBR (how?) vs. something else?
4. Role of Wholesale Outsourcing Agent (would ENA sell to marketers or
utilities or both?)
5. Other Issues

Thanks,

Jim


Check this out. Can you get in touch with Fab.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com on 02/18/2001 09:02:30 PM
To: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Jazz Fest

Hey Phillip.....I am on a plane back to St. Paul (Sunday night).  My life
completely (other than Jason and Drew) sucks right now.  I can not wait
until this project is done and over with.  I have reached the point of
thinking about quitting.  Funny how only 5 weeks ago my career counselor
asked me regarding that same question...and I had zero intention.

Anyhow, I spoke with Fabiola..and she is still interested in coming out to
Jazz Fest....and was curious in speaking with you and/or Ashley about
rooms.  She is not 100%...but is curious in talking with you re:
possibilities.  Her email is fabiola_rock@hotmail.com...and her cell number
is 617-515-6760.

Give the little one love for me...
rbk

Rachel Bonilla-Kragel
Accenture
North American C&HT
Denver - Octel 359/6017 - Direct Dial (720) 359-6017
rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


As you know, we are about to reduce EMG workforce by over 45%.  I have spent the last couple of weeks spending one on one time with  many, many employees who are not dealing well with the recent events, and who are anticipating the worst for themselves and their families.  I certainly commend the company on an orderly process, but we need to make our professional counciling staff more visible, and remind employees that this important service is available.

I cannot stress enough how poor morale, etc, is over here, and anything we can do to help will be greatly appreciated by the employees.

Regards,

Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
07:27 AM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 11/20/2000 03:14:56 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW:

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
*713-753-5986
 *713-753-7626
* yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

This email, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information
for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message.  Thank you.

> Blonde
>  <<blonde.jpg>>

 - blonde.jpg


-----Original Message-----
From: 	McBride, Jane
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Aronowitz, Alan
Subject:	RE: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

Hi Tana,
Is Fujitsu Networks Communications a Japanese company or a US company?
Jane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	04 October 2001 09:06
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-03-01.xls >>

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Steve,

Please, let  me know when you come back.
I have detected a tendency to implement different
approaches to valuation in the past.

To some extent, it reflects the absence of formal
rules for sign-off on the valuation techniques
which, in turn, reflects,  the turf wars and the desire by the
originators to control the outcomes.

Vince

stevestock@pagenetips.com on 01/19/2001 06:53:14 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Valuation

Vince,

I'd like an opportunity to talk to you about valuation.

I'm hearing confusing messages about the way that the UK IT team and the UK
traders get their Valuation code aparently signed off by Research, while
here... You provide it for our guys to wrap up.

We have now a situation where the UK team are using a home grown Valuation
piece called DOVE, where results differ from those of the equivalent USA
portcalc.

I need to break through the pride barriers and the "not built here" syndrome,
and try to do the right thing, but I don't beleive I can do that without you
guidance.

I'm scared that if we diverge too much we will never work globally on these
systems.

Steve
------------------------
Tel: 713-345-8980
Cell: 281-541-1862
Page: stevestock@pagenetips.com


Remi, Dave:

First of all I want to thank you for your hospitality and to apologize
for a delay in responding to you. It was quite a tumultuous week
and the turbulence continues.

The outline of commitments with the information on what I have done to
jumpstart the process.

1.	Review of the CEPEL model / simplified model. Chonawee
started the review process, with the help of our two native Portuguese speakers.
Less complicated/faster to run model will follow.

2.	SDDP. As you know Tom Halliburton is in Norway this week.
They put their grimy fingers on him first.
He will be back next week and will help you  to set up the SDDP runs.
He even volunteer to stay on the job for a few days longer to help
you with the project.

3.	Transmission modeling. Martin Lin will call Dave to jumpstart the process.

4.	Zimin will call David regarding swing option model, option pricing models
for non-standard distributions and truncated distributions.

5.	Cooperation with the SA University in the area of the weather research
	Remains to be discussed with Jose and Mike.

Vince


David,

I called our Credit Group to look into how large Enron's corporate guaranty is with the Duke pipelines (i.e. TETCO and Algonquin) to make sure that we will pass the credit check that will occur when the capacity is released to us.  Two counter-parties, ENA and ENA Upstream, are set up to do capacity release and other transport deals with Duke with a maximum guaranty of $16 million.  TETCO has ENA down for$1.7 million that has to cover three months of demand charges.  ENA has no other TETCO capacity at the present time, so there should be no problems passing TETCO's automatic credit check during the capacity release process.

Please note that for the two structures we just discussed, the capacity needs to be both recallable and reputtable.  If Yankee and Legal gets comfortable with the other features of the proposed structure, the gas sales price should also include the TETCO commodity cost reimbursement when Yankee calls on the gas and ENA elects to not re-release the capacity back to Yankee.

I will be back on Tuesday.  If you need to get me on Friday or Monday, page me at 1-877-347-3186.

Good luck on your quest,

Ruth


Good morning!

I was wondering if Michael has settled down, or if he is having troubles
attending.

Thanks,

Kay


Per our Monday meeting, the time line for completion of the "Phase I"
forecasting project (Hourly System Load & Next Day Load) is as follows:
 Aug. 15 - Sept. 15 (Data Collection)
 Sept. 15 - Oct. 15 (Modeling)
 Oct. 15 - Nov. 15 (System Development and Testing)
If any questions arise between now and the end of August, contact Barbara
Dillard, but as of Sept. 1, I will be the Chicago lead for this and other
forecasting projects and will be available to handle any questions or issues.

Best regards,

Mark Mixon