----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 05:47 PM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	03/23/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: TICKETED  27MAR HOUSTON TO LAX  -------- TICKETED AND UPGRADED

Please make sure my Cont. onepass account is credited and my Marriott rewards
account.

	SHERRI SORRELS <ssorrels_vitoltvl@yahoo.com>
	03/23/2001 05:15 PM

		 To: RICHARD.B.SANDERS@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject: TICKETED  27MAR HOUSTON TO LAX  -------- TICKETED AND UPGRADED

                                          AGENT SS/SS BOOKING REF ZYR7VF

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN TWANDA SWEET X39402

  DATE:  MAR 23 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27MAR HOUSTON TX     LOS ANGELES CA 230P    406P
CO 1509    Y          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      *********SEAT 2B CONFIRMED********

HOTEL                 27MAR LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN MARRIOTT
                      28MAR 333 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
                            LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
                            TELEPHONE: (213) 617-1133
                            CONFIRMATION: 81101053
                            REFERENCE: REGB00
                            RATE: RAC USD 259.00 PER NIGHT
                            ADDITIONAL CHARGES MAY APPLY

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  28MAR LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     350P    905P
CO 1506    Y          WED   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            EQP: BOEING 737-800
                      ********SEAT 3E CONFIRMED*********

      AIR FARE 1637.20      TAX 131.30          TOTAL USD        1768.50
                                            AIR TOTAL USD        1768.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD        1768.50

PAYMENT: CCAX378501018762006/0301/A000020

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/I07B51

SANDERS/RICHARD B                        TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7026273460

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COTP028685
**********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Have you noticed that almost all my documents are monsters?

Kay


I second the motion.

-----Original Message-----
From: GRIFFIN, BARBARA [SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:GRIFFIN@LONESTARSTEEL.com]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 8:13 AM
To: ALAN ALVESTAD (E-mail); Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> .
COM Dheineke@tsteel <mailto:Dheineke@tsteel> . COM Heineke (E-mail); DREW
KEEFE (E-mail); Dustin Paul Easley (E-mail); EDDIE FERGUSON (E-mail); Kim
Howry (E-mail); lvan_johnson@hotmail <mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com
lvan_johnson@hotmail <mailto:lvan_johnson@hotmail> . com com (E-mail);
NealS@Hump <mailto:NealS@Hump> . com NealS@Hump <mailto:NealS@Hump> . com
com (E-mail); Raymond Parker (E-mail); TEaker1065@aol
<mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com TEaker1065@aol <mailto:TEaker1065@aol> . com
com (E-mail)
Subject: FW: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION

-----Original Message-----
From: Portia Gordon [mailto:PGordon@SFASU.EDU]
<mailto:[mailto:PGordon@SFASU.EDU]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:28 AM
To: GRIFFIN@lonestarsteel.com <mailto:GRIFFIN@lonestarsteel.com>
Cc: macpres@ballistic.com <mailto:macpres@ballistic.com>
Subject: Fw: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION

 >Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:32:53 -0600
 >From: Jack Gordon <Jack@odsy.net <mailto:Jack@odsy.net> >
 >Subject: Fw: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION
 >To: Paul Jones <pauldjones1@juno.com
<mailto:pauldjones1@juno.com> >, Portia Gordon <pgordon@sfasu.edu
<mailto:pgordon@sfasu.edu> >,
 > Randy Gordon <randy_gordon40@yahoo.com
<mailto:randy_gordon40@yahoo.com> >, James Peel <praycc@aol.com
<mailto:praycc@aol.com> >

  >>>
  >>> Subject: HOW TO SETTLE THE ELECTION
  >>>
  >>>
   >>> > JUST A FUNNY LITTLE EMAIL I THOUGHT I WOULD
PASS ON TO
   >>> > YOU...(hope it gives you a laugh)>
   >>> >
   >>> > How to settle the 2000 Presidential Election:
   >>> >
   >>> > Ok, Folks.  I've given the people in Florida
plenty of
   >>> > time to get this election finished.  Now It is
my
   >>> > turn:
   >>> >
   >>> > #1:  Al Gore becomes President of the United
States
   >>> > (all 49  states).
   >>> >
   >>> > #2:  George W. Bush becomes the President of
the
   >>> > Republic of Texas.  Gore shouldn't mind as he
said we
   >>> > were the worst state in the union during the
campaign.
   >>> >
   >>> >
   >>> > So what does Texas have to survive as a
Republic?
   >>> >
   >>> > --NASA in Houston, Texas (we will control the
space
   >>> > industry).
   >>> > --We refine over 85% of the gasoline in the
United
   >>> > States (that is why Houston has problems with
the air
   >>> > quality).
   >>> > --Defense Industry (we have over 65% of it).
The term
   >>> > "Don't mess with Texas", will take on new
meaning.
   >>> > --Oil - we can supply all the oil the Republic
of
   >>> > Texas will need for the next 300 years.
   >>> > --Natural Gas-Again we have all we need (too
bad about
   >>> > those northern states).  Al Gore will figure a
way to
   >>> > keep Tipper and you warm....
   >>> > --Computer Industry-we currently lead the
nation in
   >>> > producing computer chips.  A small place named
Texas
   >>> > Industries, Dell Computer, EDS, etc., etc.
   >>> > --Health Centers-We have the largest research
centers
   >>> > for Cancer research, the best burn centers,
and other
   >>> > large health planning centers.
   >>> > --We have enough colleges to keep us going:
Texas A&M,
   >>> > UT, Rice, University of Houston, SMU, Baylor,
UNT,
   >>> > Texas Women's University, etc.
   >>> > --We have a ready supply of workers (just open
the
   >>> > border when we need some more) and our friends
across
   >>> > the border will pour in by the thousands.
   >>> > --We have control of the paper industry,
plastics,
   >>> > insurance, etc.
   >>> >
   >>> > This just names a few of the items that will
keep the
   >>> > Republic of Texas afloat.
   >>> >
   >>> > Now to the rest of the United States under
President
   >>> > Gore:
   >>> >
   >>> > --Since you won't have the refineries to get
gas for
   >>> > your cars, only President Gore will be able to
drive
   >>> > around in his SUV which gets him about 9 miles
per
   >>> > gallon.  The rest of the United States will
have to
   >>> > walk or ride bikes.
   >>> > --You won't have any TV as the space center in
Houston
   >>> > will cut off your communications.
   >>> > --You won't have any natural gas to heat your
homes
   >>> > but since Al's promised global warming, I'm
sure you
   >>> > won't get cold!
   >>> > --You won't need our computer chips since you
won't
   >>> > have electricity to power the computers.
   >>> >
   >>> > So don't worry about us down here in Texas.
We will
   >>> > be OK!
   >>> >
   >>> >
  >>>
 >


Jay --

I wanted to talk with first thing on Friday about our decision to weigh in
with testimony in this case.  Forgetting the question Legal may or may not
have (let's assume they don't have any concerns) about Scott testifying, it
is still my opinion that we should not file testimony.

First, I assume that you have already marked your book to the Lynch
"thoughts" on rate design and revenue allocation included in the initial
Order.   I make this assumption, because the loss to EES has already occurred
and our goal now is to try and bring back some of the value by (a) focusing
on revenue sharing and (b) rate design.  Scott indicates that the loss could
be $100MM with bad outcomes on the 2 key issues.  My purpose of EES' activity
is to try and minimize that number.  I feel that a quiet but forceful role in
the case is the best vehicle given our recent troubles in CA and before the
CPUC.

Second, I am not sure that Govt Affairs is comfortable with Scott's model of
rate design.  While tiering of rates is on the table, the question of demand
reduction payback under his framework could result in customers using 70% of
their load and paying nothing.  That hardly makes sense.  Now maybe we just
don't understand, but putting in testimony that is unclear or confusing isn't
going to win the day before the CPUC.

Third, most of our victory will come from aligning with the big users.  If we
are supporting / defending our own testimony (which they haven't seen), I
think that our ability to work through a Settlement will be limited.  Our
goal is to "pick and choose" from the best solutions proposed while trying to
highlight other options through cross-examination (granted, this may be very
hard).

Fourth, someone may try to get EES to weigh in on the allocation of these
costs to DA customers.  We have agreed not to take on that issue.  Scott
doesn't get to use the Fifth Amendment to not answer.

Scott and his team is preparing testimony.  Give me a call.  If Scott and you
are intent on moving forward, we'll do as you see fit within the other
constraints.

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
11:12 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner on 04/12/2001 05:58 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: pros and cons

Here is the list of pros and cons for Scott Stoness filing testimony in the
CPUC rate design case (testimony due tomorrow, hearing set to begin next
Monday).  We have a call into Mike Smith to get legal's view.

Pros of filing testimony:

Getting out on the table a demand reduction program and a market-based
pricing mechanism

Favorable "strawman" proposal can move direction of CPUC decision in our favor

Insurance policy in case no one files a proposal we like

Can be withdrawn before hearing if we have other proposals we can support

Could give us leverage to participate in settlement negotiations

Easier to make case through direct testimony than on cross exam.

Cons of filing testimony:

We get in a position of having to defend our position and loose ability to
throw support behind other positive proposals (alone or in combination)

We open ourselves to cross examlination and discovery  (Scott Stoness will be
supporting witness and could have information we would not want revealed).

Enron is not very popular these days and filing/testimony could fuel more
negative press

Additional Enron resources will be used (Scott's time, Tamara's time)

Market dysfunction may help ENA's position

Scott Stoness estimates that there is a $50 million risk if dollars are not
apportioned properly to each rate class, but this is an issue that a number
of parties will likely be addressing in their testimony.  He estimates that
there is an additional $50 million at risk if CPUC's seasonal rate design is
adopted as opposed to his two-part real time pricing proposal.  $100 million
potential loss if Lynch proposal does not solve the problem for the winter of
2001-2002 and anothe rate increase is needed in November.


Sally

Hello again, and how are you?

I guess you are still as busy as described below, but I hope you got some
time out from your Friday concept, and have had some time to think about
Japan. FYI, on Wednesday I will have a confrence call with Brent Price to
talk about EGM and Japan, from a Commercial Support perspective.

FYI, I am up in Oslo this week signing off Enron Nordic Energy, and are
comming to San Antonio next week for this accounting offsite, where I guess I
will see you? Any news on the offsite you were planning in October with Mike?

I look forward to hear from you.

Regards
Jan-Erland

To: Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Japan Commercial Support Model

Thanks for your comprehensive note on your plans for middle and back office
in Japan.  I have done a quick review, and I agree with your thought
processes.  I also agree that being able to leverage trading operations
personnel and experience in Sydney, with lower wages, makes a lot of sense.
While distance is great, the small time zone difference makes this a good
option.

I want to take a little more time to review this in more detail.  After
several months of schedules that have been too full, I have initiated a
practice of holding one day a week open for work at my desk, with no
meetings.  That day is Friday this week, so I have put a review of your
document on the list for more careful review on Friday.  I can send you a
note then if there are any other comments that I have.

I should have apologized  in the first paragraph for standing you up while
you were here in Houston.  Jeff Shankman was on the war path with some
concerns over V@R calculations on the day that you were in town, and my
schedule was thrown to the winds until we could get him comfortable with the
calculations (he was over his limit that day -- never any questions when he
is under!).  I hope that we will have the opportunity to speak in person
sometime in the not too distant future.

Mike Jordan and I have been working on a worldwide forum for business
controllers for all commodities and offices.  I am working on securing a
location in or around Houston, shooting for October 23,24 as potential
dates.  More details to come on that in the next day or so.  I know that is a
long way from Toyko, but if the dates work for you I hope that you can join
us.


<http://www.utilisenergy.com>

 <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>

Market operations & fundamentals

  In May 2002, Ontario, Canada's most industrialized province will deregulate its electricity market. Are you fully informed about the new market structure and ready to take advantage of the business opportunities it represents?

Click here for free summary and table of contents <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>

 <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>

Timely information and analysis...

New York City based energy consulting firm, Utilis Energy, offers a thorough appraisal of deregulation in Ontario.

Our study:

Explores the role of the Independent Market Operator
Explains how spot market power prices will be derermined
Offers detailed 10-year electricity demand forecasts
Provides in-depth commercial & industrial load profile data

Click here for free summary and table of contents <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>

or call Utilis Energy on 917 371 8161

 <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>	 ...  a better understanding of Ontario's electricity market, its operations, fundamentals and end user load profiles

 <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>	 ... participation requirements necessary to become an energy service provider
 <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>	 ... knowledge needed to develop a targeted marketing and customer acquisition strategy

Click here for free summary and table of contents <http://www.utilisenergy.com/casestudies.html>

or call Utilis Energy on 917 371 8161

Utilis Energy respects your privacy. We never pass your information along to third parties.

If you have received this message in error, or prefer not to receive communications from Utilis Energy, please reply

to this email with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line


Forwarded at request of Joe Hillings:

Please find attached the final CSI letter sent to President Clinton on
the WTO services negotiations. Thank you for your comments and
contributions to the letter.

Best regards,
Liesyl

--
**********************************
Liesyl I. Franz
Director
Coalition of Service Industries
805 15th Street, NW, Suite 1110
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: 202-289-7460
Fax: 202-775-1726
E-mail: franz@uscsi.org
http://www.uscsi.org

Visit http://www.worldservicescongress.com for recommendations and
proceedings from the World Services Congress in Atlanta, GA November
1-3.

 - Ltr-Clinton-Svcs negs 2000.doc


Dale,

Thanks for your message.
I don't know the labor market  in London that well but here the market
for quants is very hot.  Steve is in my view an exceptionally talented person
and I would go an extra mile to retain  him long-term for the company.

I would adjust the base salary or the kicker upward a bit.
o62,000 Basic  is what Anjam is receiving currently  (if I remember
correctly). Steve has a much higher value
to Enron than Anjam.

Vince

Dale Surbey
08/30/2000 07:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Confidential

Vince,

This is the package HR is proposing for Steven.  What do you think?

- Dale

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Surbey/LON/ECT on 30/08/2000 13:50
---------------------------
Sophie Kingsley   29/08/2000 20:32

To: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Confidential

Sorry Dale, long day, here are the proposed numbers

2 Year Exec
o62,000 Basic  ( currently o55K )
o10K each year kickers
$50,000 worth of options to vest 1/3 1/3 1/3

Let me know what you think.

Regards

Sophie


Leandra,

As previously discussed, attached is a red-line version of suggested changes
from Tractebel and ENA.

Please note ENA changes from the earlier draft are as follows:

Section 4.2 Triggering Event.     Increase defaults for both parties to
$100,000,000.

Section 4.6  Collateral Requirement/ Termination Payment  Threshold. Decrease
in Tractebel's Threshold from $10,000,000 to $7,500,000.

Appendix"1"
"Material Adverse Change".   Change Tractebel S.A. "Minimum net worth ratio"
to $3,375,000,000 USD from $150,000,000 Belgian Francs.

Laura Kinner in your credit dept.  is working with ENA's Russell Diamond
concerning these changes to credit sections.

Finally, although this draft has been reviewed by my attorney, there are a
few sections as you will note we need to discuss further.

Thank you for your assistance.  Please let me have your thoughts regarding
the draft.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jennifer:
Here is the latest CA for Jerry to review.  Please send him this e-mail
asap.  Thanks!
Ben Rogers


Thought you might want to see this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Terry/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 09:19
AM ---------------------------
From: Matt Pena/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/21/2001 09:11 AM
To: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Schomer/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Ripley/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Deal Ids In Path Manager

As you're aware, we're having to bridge Houston Street ids into Unify from
Sitara.

We are being asked, as a requirement, to not display the EOL id on statements
that are identified as "Broker EOL trade" deals originating from EOL.  We
have two options to accomodate this requirement:

Option 1 is to have the modify the bridge code to not bridge over the EOL
deal id if the deal is a "Broker EOL trade"  deal.  One of the drawbacks of
this option is that you won't be able to referenence the EOL id on the Path
Manager for these related deals.  All other deals will have the EOL deal id,
if applicable.  The EOL id would not show up on the statements because it
wouldn't be populated.

Option 2 is to modify several areas of code in the Settlements area which may
be more time consuming.  The obvious code change would be in the statement
generation area as well as other report type information.

Option 2 allows you the greatest flexibility while Option 1 may be quicker to
implement.

Please pass this along to others in your group and get feedback.  Please
share your thoughts....
I've attached an email explaining the Broker EOL trades.  This is not to be
confused with Broker deals done at a given point with not transportation.
These will continue to come across as you'd normally expect.

Any questions, please ask...

Thanks!


Please be sure to access the performance review system as soon as possible to
select persons to contribute to your review.  While commercial people are
particularly helpful, you may select reviewers at any level.


I will have both Jim Saunders and Jerry Peters in attendance.

Cindy Stark
12/13/2000 01:52 PM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FYI

Thanks for the "heads-up", Julie!   Stan would like for both Danny and Rod to
send subs to our staff meeting on January 8th, and please let me know who
they will be.

Thanks,
Cindy

Julie Armstrong
12/13/2000 09:38 AM
To: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: FYI

Cindy:

Please note that I just received information from Cindy Olson on the Year-End
2000 VP and MD PRC meeting.  It is scheduled for Monday, January 8th and
Danny is required to attend as he serves on that committee.  Danny would not
be able to attend Stan's staff meeting.  Thanks.


Julee Malinowski-Ball is out of town till Monday  April 16, 2001.  However,
the IEP company lobbyist conference call is scheduled for April 12, 2001 at
2:00 PM.  Julee thinks someone should lead the call and that it extremely
important and valuable for everyone to touch base before we get bogged down
again with hearings next week.
On the agenda should definitely be a discussion of AB 60x lobbying strategy
and update, SB 28x update and the proposed changes to SB 6x (heard from
Brian Kelly, he submitted language on the eminent domain provisions of the
bill).

Call In Date    ~     April 12, 2001

Call In Time    ~      2:00 PM

Call In Number ~     (800) 403-2013

Code               ~     207814

If you have any questions, please call me or email me.

Thank you,

Karen Baker
(916) 552-7070
kebaker@ns.net

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net


Please note that the company number for Enron Energia Industrial de Mexico B.V. has changed from 45B to 1627.  This is in order to accommodate the functional currency change from Eurodollars to USD.

Please share this information with other interested parties.

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


The following information was provided by Cyndi Wulfson with the Outlook Migration Team.

Email Diskspace Usage Policy states that each user will be provided a Microsoft Exchange mailbox for use with Microsoft Outlook and that mailbox will be limited to a maximum storage limit of 100MB. It is important to note that the Global Messaging team had these mailbox capacity limits in Notes, however, they weren't strictly enforced. As we move to a new mail system, it is critical that all users of Email understand their responsibilities of proper Email usage, mail capacity policy enforcement and the resulting paradigm shift of how Enron utilizes eMail.

Enron has a legal retention policy that states that backup tapes of Email are kept a maximum of 8 days, items in folders older than 365 days are deleted/purged, and therefore eMail should be thought of as temporary storage. It is absolutely critical that as an Email user, we use Email as only the reception point and initiation point of mail and not as storage.

Ways of properly storing mail and mail contents are:
1.	Detach attachments to the home directory (H:\). This will decrease the overall size of one's mail file significantly. A user must be very diligent about this routine of receiving and detaching attachments to h:\.
2.	Deleting unneccessary Email from mailbox folders and mailbox system folders such as the Sent Mail folder. One would be surprised at how many times one attachment or large message is floating around in their mailbox as conversation threads.
3.	Review and follow the recommendations for conserving diskspace and customizing your Outlook mailbox for more efficient identification and viewing of mail sizes and conversation threads.
4.	Additional diskspace can be requested through the eRequest system: <http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/entry/srrs.asp>  This requires approval from the user's Vice-President or above and comes in 25 MB increments. Each 25 MB increment requires a separate eRequest and approval.
5.	Public Folders can be requested through the eRequest system: <http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/entry/srrs.asp>  Public Folders can be an additional place for shared group information, group calendars, or personal mail storage. The name Public Folders is misleading - they are essentially folders that reside on an Exchange server that can be viewed and used through Outlook. They can be given rights to a single user or many users. Public Folders still have the legal retention policy applied to them if they are used for mail storage, personal or shared.


Good Afternoon Kathy,

Please get susie a December Parking pass

C
-----Original Message-----
From: Smhoesly@aol.com [mailto:Smhoesly@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: parking

Hi.  How's it going.  One more week of being a stay at home mom.  Crazy.  Will you please tell Kathy that I will need a December parking pass for the parking lot?  Thanks a million.  See you shortly. S.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 07:40 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/12/2001 01:24 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Marcie
Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ABX 5 / ABX 6

ABX 5 and ABX 6 both passed out of the Assembly this morning.

ABX 5 ) Regarding ISO/PX governance, passed off of the Assembly floor on
a vote of 60-9.  All 9 &no8 votes were cast by Republicans.  The only
legislator to speak against the bill was Assemblyman Phil Wyman who
objected to the idea of giving Governor Davis the sole authority to
appoint ISO and PX members.

ABX 6 ) Regarding retention of IOU generation assets, passed off of the
Assembly floor on a vote of 60-10. All 10 &no8 votes were cast by
Republicans.  Three legislators spoke against the bill: Assemblyman John
Campbell, who indicated that he could support the bill if it had a
sunset provision, and Assemblyman Sam Aanestad and Assemblyman Rod
Pacheco, both of whom objected to the idea of giving the CPUC more
authority.  Assemblyman Aanestad indicated that he does not believe
deregulation is the cause of our current situation, but rather, previous
decisions by the CPUC.


He has been focused on Sitara for a long time.  He reports to Scott Mills,
who is the user lead for the project.  I am copying Scott on this message, as
his Sitara team is small and he would know best what deliverables are on the
horizon and how critical Tom's involvement is to those deliverables.  I
suggest that we involve Scott in these discussions.  --Sally

Louise Kitchen
05/08/2000 10:09 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tom Engel

We were thinking Tom would be a great fit for the EnronOnline development job
we are currently.  Mark Dilworth is going to approach him - if OK with you.
We think he wants a change (we think he has been on Sitara 3 years).

Louise


The deal at mtr 8663 in April was not a spot deal.  This was a Gas Daily Firm
agreement under the term contract with Southern Union, deal 72349.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Karen Lindley @ ENRON                           06/14/2000 07:03 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal Number

Darren,

I understand that you can tell me the deal number for a spot deal you set up
for meter 988663 for 4/4-4/9 for Janet Wallis.

Let me know if you need any additional information from me.

Thanks!

Karen


fyi - we did our first "deal" today on Commodity Logic!!!  It saved Enron
about $7,000.

Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 01:56
PM ---------------------------

customerservice@commoditylogic.com on 01/19/2001 01:18:32 PM
To: customerservice@commoditylogic.com, tgros@enron.com,
douglas.fuehne@enron.com, debbie.r.brackett@enron.com,
russell.diamond@enron.com, wbradfo@enron.com, fred.lagrasta@enron.com,
mary.birmingham@enron.com, nera.swisher@enron.com, reginald.hart@enron.com,
bryce.baxter@enron.com, pam.b.boxx@enron.com, greg.whiting@enron.com,
jim.pond@enron.com, elise.clark@enron.com, amy.spoede@enron.com,
melissa.k.ratnala@enron.com, audrey.cook@enron.com, dale.neuner@enron.com,
sheri.thomas@enron.com, kristen.j.hanson@enron.com, joanie.h.ngo@enron.com,
cynthia.hakemack@enron.com, andrea.crump@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Commodity Logic Request

Mark Soulliere has made an offer to CommodityLogic to receive payment for an
amount that was originally scheduled to be paid on January 25, 2001.  Below
are the details of the offer:

User: Mark Soulliere
Counterparty: Tenaska Marketing Ventures
Counterparty ID: 208
Payment Amount: $12,762,722.45
Offered payment date: January 23, 2001
Deal Tracking Number: 39

This payment represents $12,768,389.51 of the total receivable account with
Enron.

The client should be notified by e-mail within 1 business day as to whether
the offer has been accepted or rejected.

Thank you.


Despite my veto eBiz decided to publish something on California energy
prices.  I think Palmer overrulled me.  He said that the article was harmless
but I still think it is stupid for us to be writing articles about this.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 12/17/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

From: eBiz on 12/15/2000 06:33 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: The Chairman's Reward

This is the last eBiz issue for 2000!  Read more about Ken and Jeff's big
announcement.

Also in this issue:
The California energy crisis
Enron's forward market in DRAM
Plugging into Japan
The little Enron-backed engine that could
Contango and backwardation
Flying with corporate angels

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz December 15, 2000."


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/20/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/20/2000 08:56 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EPC contract to be 97-10 compliant

I will be making the clean up changes today and will issue tonightor tomorrow
AM

To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: EPC contract to be 97-10 compliant

Hi there,

Any luck with the form to work with on the affilate/epc/97 10 compliant
contract?

Thanks,

Kay


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042023.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred: -700.00 / Final: -699.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/20/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


I have a problem,  I just accepted a new position at my work.  The hours are
really fucked up and are kind of like fireman hours where I have to work some
night shifts and weekends but get several days of in a row afterward.  I
won't find out my schedule for the month until next week so there is a
possibility that I may not be able to go if i am scheduled to work that
weekend.  I realize I will get some shit for this but at least I am not using
the OPERA EXCUSE.  I will let you guys know as soon as I get my new schedule
but, if I am off on that weekend i am definetly in.
Memo to Jones:  You HAVE to come up with some better excuses if you don't
want to get hazed.  The Opera!  REALLY GUY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?

"Wilson, Matt" <matt.wilson@weyerhaeuser.com> on 10/09/2000 01:12:56 PM
To: "'Marcus Jones'" <jones@mca-architects.com>
cc: "'Mark.Guzman@enron.com'" <Mark.Guzman@enron.com>,
"'matt.hsu@interwoven.com'" <matt.hsu@interwoven.com>
Subject: RE: Elk Hunt

Hey, I told everybody to leave the first two weekends in November open, then
I asked what your preference might be.  Hsu was the only one who gave a
preference.  Macy's birthday is the first weekend.  Why is this the first
time you decided to mention the friggin opera.  Give a ticket to Cindy or
whoever and nut up and go bag a bull.

> ----------
> From:  Marcus Jones[SMTP:jones@mca-architects.com]
> Sent:  Monday, October 09, 2000 7:59 AM
> To:  Wilson, Matt
> Subject:  RE: Elk Hunt
>
> Hey I can't go that weekend!!  I can go on the 4th.  Julie and I have
> Opera
> tickets for the 11th.  Go the 4th!! Why not?
>
> Marcus B. Jones
> MCA Architects, P.C.
> PH (503)226-0622
> FAX (503)226-0626
> 30 NW 1st Ave.
> Portland, OR 97209
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wilson, Matt [mailto:matt.wilson@weyerhaeuser.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:20 AM
> To: 'Mark.Guzman@enron.com'; Marcus Jones; 'matt.hsu@interwoven.com'
> Subject: Elk Hunt
>
>
> November 11th and 12th is the weekend we will plan on going.  I'm going to
> leave Eugene on Thursday the 9th at about 4pm and plan to arrive at the
> Starkey camp at around 10pm (45 min. south of La Grande).  Can anyone else
> get Friday off?  It would be nice to meet at Marcus' place and take one
> vehicle (an Explorer?).  If you plan to hunt then you'd better get your
> hunting license and tag (Rocky Mountain Elk, second season) real soon.  I
> plan to hunt Friday, Saturday, and Sunday and head for home on Sunday the
> 12th about noon.  We should be back in Portland by 5pm.  Hope you guys
> don't
> flake out.  Papa Wilson bought a nice big canvas tent and wood stove so
> were
> going in style this year.  You will need warm clothes.  Preferably wool
> because you don't want anything that makes noise, like nylon.  Call me if
> you need some options.  Also a warm sleeping bag and don't use any scents
> before you come over (shampoos, soaps, deoderants) as the Elk have great
> smell.
>


Please review the attached outage report.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923 (Office)
713-646-2584 (Fax)


Eric,

If you could, in the future send this stuff to Donnita also.  I have already
forwarded this to her this time.  Her email address is
dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:33 PM
To: daphneco64@bigplanet.com; lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com; Bass, Jason;
shusser@enron.com
Subject: Telluride E-Ride Newsletter

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 04:32
PM ---------------------------

emailclub@telluridecolorado.net on 11/08/2000 04:57:04 PM

To:   ebass@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Telluride E-Ride Newsletter

HELLO AGAIN E-RIDERS!

Yes, the snow has started to come down! In very big ways!  In fact,
Telluride has received over 3 feet of fresh powder since October 1 and the
temperatures have been frigid?which makes for excellent snowmaking
conditions. Winter has come, and you know what that means ? YES! Time to
strap on some boards and make some turns!

SNOW REPORT
As the snow has begun to come with increasing regularity, you can imagine
the local attitude begins to buoy. At lunch the other day, when we looked
out the window and saw the big flakes coming down, we made a loud whoop
with our waiter, causing all heads in the restaurant to turn our way. But
when the other diners saw the white stuff, EVERYONE started buzzing with
the anticipation. Folks are getting ready for the season. For a sneak
preview, check out the photo of the day at
www.telluride-ski.com/dayphoto.html.

BARGAINS & DEALS
The best-case scenario for skiing Telluride is to live here. But the NEXT
best-case scenario is that you get a screaming deal to vacation here. And
that's what Telluride and Mountain Village Visitor Services has for you.
Check out these packages for round-trip air, lodging and skiing from some
of America's biggest hubs:

Dallas Special:          $831 per person - 5 nights lodging, 4 days skiing
and roundtrip air to Montrose
Houston Special:    $814 per person - 5 nights lodging, 4 days skiing and
roundtrip air to Montrose
Chicago Special:    $825 per person - 5 nights lodging, 4 days skiing and
roundtrip air to Montrose
Miami Special:      $929 per person - 5 nights lodging, 4 days skiing and
roundtrip air to Montrose

To get any of these specials, call 1-888-288-7360.

If you choose to put together a package on your own, check out the lodging
deals at www.telluride-ski.com and click on HOT DEALS.

WHAT'S NEW
You can never have too much snow. With that in mind, the Telluride Ski
Resort installed a new snowmaking system this summer that guarantees that
every lift pod will have coverage on at least one run all season long! Yep.
Lifts 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 will have better conditions for riding and skiing
from beginning to end. As the hipper folks say, the turns will be "tasty."

The tastiest new addition to the mountain, however, is Allred's, a new
140-seat restaurant that is guaranteed to delight even the most
discriminating diners. Located mid-mountain at the gondola Station St.
Sophia, Allred's will serve as a private club by day in the winter, an
upscale lunch spot in the summer and a fine dining experience in the
evenings year-round. More on this epicurean dream in later e-rides. For
dinner reservations, call 970-728-7474.

One other great new thing: It's easier to get to Telluride than ever
before. You can now fly to Montrose EVERY DAY from Dallas/Ft. Worth on
American Airlines?but the flight will only have 129 seats, so be sure your
body is in one of them!

WHAT'S HAPPENING
Of course the most important thing on the Telluride calendar is November
22, the Official Opening Day. But there are other things worth mentioning.
Like the Sneak Preview of the mountain on November 21. For one day only you
can ski Telluride for $20, and all proceeds go to the Telluride Ski and
Snowboard Club.

After the Donation Day, you can still get good deals. From November 21
through December 16, Telluride hosts its annual Ski Free & More program.
What's it entail? Exactly what it says. Skiers and riders staying at
participating lodges in the towns of Telluride and Mountain Village can
choose a free lift ticket, a free ski clinic, a free lunch or a free
half-day of childcare for each night they stay. For more information call
888-288-7360.

And if you're looking forward to having a ball, why not do it right at the
annual Black & White Affair? On November 25, the Telluride Ski and
Snowboard Club hosts this gala event at the luxurious Telluride Conference
Center. Dress up and dance off your turkey. No one puts on a ball like
Telluride!

SLICE OF LIFE
Imagine being over 50 years old and never having seen any snow! Such was
the case for my friend Sarah, who recently moved to Telluride from the
Caribbean. She and her daughters arrived late this summer, and when the
snows began to fall a few weeks ago, they were in rapture! Sarah ran
outside and began to dance around (to her 17-year-old daughter's absolute
embarrassment!) However, the daughters both caught the enthusiasm and built
their first snowman ever. The snowman , of course, had a perfect carrot
nose.. An organic carrot, no less. Hey, this is Telluride. Only the best
for our snowmen.

AND SO, E-RIDERS,
That's all for this letter. Hope you're planning your trip to Telluride,
where the snow is always whiter and the lines are always short. See you on
the slopes!

Rosemerry

WHO'S WRITING THIS ANYWAY?
Against her will, Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer learned to ski in Telluride six
years ago. But after a few turns, she fell ? in love with the sport. She
lives with her husband and cat at the base of Lift 7?an ideal spot for
getting first chair of the morning.


Go Florida...

-----Original Message-----
From: Kroll, Heather
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Stepenovitch, Joe
Subject: FW: Powerful

Did you see this one, from the Miami Herald.  It gives me chills. . . and hope.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jafry, Rahil
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:01 PM
To: Kroll, Heather
Subject: FW: Powerful

-----Original Message-----
From: Tonya Carr [mailto:tonyac@centurydev.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:37 AM
To: hashwani1@aol.com; trevinom@snbtx.com; phart@tsb.edu;
lobobl@aetna.com
Subject: Powerful

by Leonard Pitts Jr. of the Miami Herald
We'll go forward from this moment

It's my job to have something to say.
They pay me to provide words that help make sense of that which troubles
the American soul. But in this moment of airless shock when hot tears
sting disbelieving eyes, the only thing I can find to say, the only
words that seem to fit, must be addressed to the unknown author of this
suffering.

You monster. You beast. You unspeakable bastard.

What lesson did you hope to teach us by your coward's attack on our
World Trade Center, our Pentagon, us? What was it you hoped we would
learn? Whatever it was, please know that you failed.

Did you want us to respect your cause? You just damned your cause. Did
you want to make us fear? You just steeled our resolve. Did you want to
tear us apart? You just brought us together.

Let me tell you about my people. We are a vast and quarrelsome family, a
family rent by racial, social, political and class division, but a
family nonetheless. We're frivolous, yes, capable of expending
tremendous emotional energy on pop cultural minutiae-a singer's
revealing dress, a ball team's misfortune, a cartoon mouse. We're
wealthy, too, spoiled by the ready availability of trinkets and material
goods, and maybe because of that, we walk through life with a certain
sense of blithe entitlement. We are fundamentally decent,
though-peace-loving and compassionate. We struggle to know the right
thing and to do it. And we are, the overwhelming majority of us, people
of faith, believers in a just and loving God. Some people-you,
perhaps-think that any or all of this makes us weak. You're mistaken. We
are not weak. Indeed, we are strong in ways that cannot be measured by
arsenals.

IN PAIN
Yes, we're in pain now. We are in mourning and we are in shock. We're
still grappling with the unreality of the awful thing you did, still
working to make ourselves understand that this isn't a special effect
from some Hollywood blockbuster, isn't the plot development from a Tom
Clancy novel. Both in terms of the awful scope of their ambition and the
probable final death toll, your attacks are likely to go down as the
worst acts of terrorism in the history of the United States and,
probably, the history of the world. You've bloodied us as we have never
been bloodied before. But there's a gulf of difference between making us
bloody and making us fall. This is the lesson Japan was taught to its
bitter sorrow the last time anyone hit us this hard, the last time
anyone brought us such abrupt and monumental pain. When roused, we are
righteous in our outrage, terrible in our force. When provoked by this
level of barbarism, we will bear any suffering, pay any cost, go to any
length, in the pursuit of justice.

I tell you this without fear of contradiction. I know my people, as you,
I think, do not. What I know reassures me. It also causes me to tremble
with dread of the future. In the days to come, there will be
recrimination and accusation, fingers pointing to determine whose
failure allowed this to happen and what can be done to prevent it from
happening again. There will be heightened security, misguided talk of
revoking basic freedoms. We'll go forward from this moment sobered,
chastened, sad. But determined, too. Unimaginably determined.

THE STEEL IN US
You see, the steel in us is not always readily apparent. That aspect of
our character is seldom understood by people who don't know us well. On
this day, the family's bickering is put on hold. As Americans we will
weep, as Americans we will mourn, and as Americans, we will rise in
defense of all that we cherish. So I ask again: What was it you hoped
to teach us? It occurs to me that maybe you just wanted us to know the
depths of your hatred. If that's the case, consider the message
received. And take this message in exchange: You don't know my people.
You don't know what we're capable of. You don't know what you just
started.

But you're about to learn.


Digital Dispatch    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	 [IMAGE]   June 7, 2001   [IMAGE]  --Steve Fox, editor in chief, CNET.com     Dear readers, I can't resist a good fight: Napster vs. the RIAA, Intel vs. AMD, Palm vs. Pocket PC. But in my opinion, nothing beats the PC vs. Mac rivalry. It's an ongoing conflict that has generated more bad blood, accusatory e-mails (just ask any tech editor), and overall charges of press bias than any other high-tech confrontation imaginable. The responsible folks on the CNET Software team considered playing peacemaker to the warring tribes, possibly building consensus and even trying to heal old wounds. But that wouldn't be much fun, would it? So instead, we've decided to add fuel to the fire with the third installment of our OS death match, this time pitting Mac OS X against Windows 2000 . This highly unscientific battle royale compares the two heavyweight contenders from each camp to see who gets to wear the crown. Tell us what you think at software-mailbag@cnet.com . We've braced ourselves for the onslaught.       This Week's Top 10   Top 10 celebrity viruses       [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   Software [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Net payment nightmares  It may be convenient to pay for goods digitally, but that path is fraught with danger. Your money may get lost in the ether, you might get locked out of your account, or you may end up paying for goods you never receive. Read on for five frightening tales of transaction terrors, plus tips on how to avoid or fix them. In Software     Electronics [IMAGE] Get the PDA that's right for you  There are as many ways to use handhelds as there are hands to be held. But to make things a little easier, we've narrowed down the field a bit to students, executives, gamers, musicians, and a few other categories. If you're looking for some advice on which PDA is just right for you, click the link above. In Electronics   Wireless [IMAGE] Ask the cell phone diva  We were so impressed by the response to our Wireless Insider "What people are asking the cell phone diva" story that we decided to make it a regular feature on CNET Wireless. Senior Editor Joni Blecher will do her best to track down the answers to all your questions about cell phones, service providers, and accessories. So keep 'em coming! In Wireless    Software [IMAGE] OS death match: OS X vs. Windows 2000  OS X versus Windows 2000, eh? Sure, why not? Both of these operating systems are workstation ready, server friendly, and easy enough for even the smallest home office. So how does plain-Jane Windows 2000 match up with OS X's bells and whistles? We tossed these two operating systems into the arena in a heavyweight matchup, and only we can pick a winner. In Software    Hardware [IMAGE] For richer or for poorer: WinBook X1, J1  How different can two 1GHz notebooks from the same company be? Quite a bit, actually. We pit the sleek WinBook X1 against the bargain WinBook J1 to see which is the better deal. In Hardware    Web Building [IMAGE] Tricks of the trade  As dot-coms fold and thousands of Web workers get pink-slipped, adult Web sites remain a reliable and profitable online venture. Learn how the technologies that are commonly used to put adult content on the Web can be used on any site to successful ends. In Web Building          celebrity viruses [IMAGE] Top Ten  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] The Chernobyl virus is back, this time lurking  in messages that promise naked pictures of actress/singer Jennifer Lopez. The e-mail tempts credulous users with the subject line "Where are you," and an attachment (jenniferlopez_naked.jpg.vbs) that, when opened, can delete files and make hash of your hard drive. Fortunately, few people have fallen for the Lopez virus. But in light of this latest attack, coupled with February's Anna Kournikova worm , we here at CNET are worried about future celebrity-based viruses. Here are 10 nasties we hope never make it to your in-box:    10 The Madonna virus This unstoppable pathogen defies antivirus programs by constantly reinventing itself. 9 The Jim Jeffords virus Partitions your hard drive so that the two sides don't want to work together. 8 The Michael Jackson virus Launch this bad boy and your entire screen slowly fades to white. 7 The Anne Heche virus Changes all your system settings...then switches them back to the original defaults. 6 The Ozzy Osborne virus Bites the heads off BAT files. 5 The Calista Flockhart virus Claims to eat up your RAM, but we've never noticed any significant impact. 4 The Dan Quayle virus When you run spell-check, this macro virus randomly adds the letter e to the ends of words. 3 The Marcel Marceau virus Deletes all your MP3 and WAV files. 2 The Oprah Winfrey virus Resets your Amazon.com cookies so that you have nothing but Oprah's Book Club titles on your wish list. 1 The Claus Von Bulow virus Rumors that it puts your PC into permanent sleep mode are patently false.  On the CNET Network [IMAGE]    Tech Trends   Hardware   Software   Shopping   Downloads       News   Investing   Electronics   Web Building   Help & How-Tos       Internet   Games   Message Boards   CNET TV & Radio   Music Center      	[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  Click Here!   Tech News News.com  Microsoft messaging tactics recall browser wars   Death of the free Web   Will 3D on phones jump out at consumers?   Windows XP may steer users' Web choices   JavaOne: Joy plugs Jxta    More CNET News    Top Downloads  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Audiogalaxy Satellite   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Trillian   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Macromedia Director Shockwave Studio   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Now Up-to-Date & Contact (for the Mac)     Editors' Choice  IBM ThinkPad T20 notebook  Editors' Choice  In Hardware  Sonicblue Rio 800 128MB MP3 player  Editors' Choice  In Music Center  Sony DCR-PC5 digital camcorder  Editors' Choice  In Electronics  Microsoft Publisher 2002  Editors' Choice  In Software  Progeny Debian 6.0  Editors' Choice  In Linux Center  Novatel Wireless Merlin for Ricochet  Editors' Choice  In Wireless  NetMechanic  Editors' Choice  In Web Building    Also from CNET    IT manager community from Tech Republic   Featured comparison: 50 most popular handhelds   Find a wireless phone for your favorite grad   Laid off? Check out 90,000 job listings   Build an online photo album    	[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  	 [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	  Subscribe to other free newsletters        News.com Daily Dispatch   Web Building Newsletter     All newsletters   The e-mail address for your subscription is shendri@ECT.ENRON.COM. Please send any questions, comments, or concerns to: Newsletter-Support@cnet.com . Subscribe  | Unsubscribe    	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]  	Price comparisons  |  Product reviews  |  Business solutions  | Downloads  |  All CNET services  	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
Copyright  ?1995-2001 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy policy .

[IMAGE]


If Suzy were married this might be applicable to her last Friday nite . . .

  > Two buddies, Tony and Steve, are getting very drunk

  > at a bar

  > when suddenly Steve throws up all over himself. "Oh,

  > no. Now Jane will

  > kill me!"  Steve says.

  >

  >  Tony says, "Don't worry, pal. Just tuck a twenty in

  > your breast

  >  pocket, tell Jane that someone threw up on you and

  > gave you twenty dollars

  > for the dry cleaning bill."

  >

  >  So they stay for another couple of hours and get

  > even drunker.

  >

  >  Eventually Steve rolls into home and his Jane

  > starts to give him

  > a bad time. "You reek of alcohol and you've puked

  > all over yourself! My

  > God, you're disgusting!"

  >

  >  Speaking very carefully so as not to slur, Steve

  > says,

  >  "Nowainaminit,

  >  I can e'splain everything! Itsh not what you think.

  > I only had a

  > couple drinks. But this other guy got sick on me...

  > he'd had one too many

  > and he just couldn't hold his liquor. He said he was

  > very sorry an' gave

  > me twenty bucks for the cleaning bill!"

  >

  >  Jane looks in the breast pocket and says, "But this

  > is forty bucks."

  >

  > "Oh, yeah... I almos' forgot, he shit in my pants,

  > too."

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture--Houston
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com


Milly,

Let me know when you have a minute. Just want to have a quick chat.

Chris


EAS-

This is related to the e-mail I sent you earlier.  She is still asking for
those agreements!

Genia
----- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:09 PM -----

	"Jorgensen Hillestad, Arlene" <arlene.jorgensen@nrgenergy.com>
	05/30/2001 02:40 PM

		 To: <Genia.FitzGerald@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NRG

Did you make progress on finding the agreements in the matrixes I asked
about a couple weeks ago? Thanx.

-----Original Message-----
From: Genia.FitzGerald@enron.com [mailto:Genia.FitzGerald@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Jorgensen Hillestad, Arlene
Subject: Re: NRG
Importance: High

Arlene,

I am trying this again with hopefully the correct e-mail address.

Genia
----- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 01:30 PM -----

                    Genia

                    FitzGerald           To:
Arlene.Hillestad@nrgenergy.com
                                         cc:     Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    05/16/2001           Subject:     Re: NRG

                    10:30 AM

Dear Arlene,

Per your request to Elizabeth Sager and my voice message to you this
morning, attached please find the documents you have requested.  Please
don't hesitate to call me at (713) 853-6389 if I can be of further
assistance.

Regards,
Genia FitzGerald
Senior Legal Specialist

(See attached file: ISDA EEC Chart.doc)(See attached file: ISDA US
ENERGY
COMMITTEE2.doc)


Ken did speak with Ulf (and I believe left you a message).  I have not heard
about further contacts as yet.

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	01/30/2001 04:37 AM

		 To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: a few items

1  Do you kow if Ken Lay found Mr. Ulf Boge, the President of the German
Federal Cartel Office, at Davos?  The commercial team for Germany is just
very keen to know.

2  Do you know if Ken was able to make any other calls on my behalf regarding
the Bush administration?  I know he spoke to Bob Zoellick the week of the
Inauguration.  In particular, comments to Karl Rove, Clay Johnson (White
House personnel, I am told), and the VP would be helpful.

thanks  Mark


Regulators in Washington State Approve
Accord to Trim Companies' Power Costs
By ROBERT GAVIN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- Washington state regulators Thursday approved a settlement
between the state's biggest utility and some of the largest industrial users
that aims to lower the companies' soaring electricity costs.

The settlement brings to an end a bitter dispute between some large
industrial concerns, including Seattle-based Boeing Co. and Puget Sound
Energy of Bellevue over a pricing structure that tied electricity sales to
volatile spot markets, where prices have soared to levels 10 or more times
as high as year-ago prices. Recent spot-market prices have ranged between
$200 and $350 a megawatt hour.

The settlement, in effect, introduces retail electricity competition in a
state that has yet to deregulate its power markets.

The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, which announced the
settlement, had ordered hearings in January to develop price controls after
a dozen companies filed complaints alleging they were being overcharged by
Puget Sound Energy. The hearings were delayed while the parties negotiated
the settlement.

Under the settlement, the six biggest customers will be able to buy power
from any source, including other utilities, power marketers and even each
other. Puget Sound Energy will provide the transmission at regulated rates,
which include the cost of transmission and a profit. This arrangement will
allow the customers to lower costs because they will be able to enter
longer-term contracts, typically 60 to 90 days, at prices that are lower
than those of the spot market, which reflects the most expensive prices.

In addition to Boeing, those customers include Georgia-Pacific Corp. of
Atlanta, which operates a plant in Bellingham, and Equilon Enterprises LLC
of Houston, which operates refineries near Anacortes.

"This gives us the flexibility to structure our own transactions and
purchase power at prices [at which] they can afford to stay in business,"
says Melinda Davison, a lawyer who represented most of the companies in the
case.

Puget Sound Energy officials weren't available for comment.

Part of the settlement is similar to Oregon's electricity-deregulation plan
for big commercial customers, scheduled to take effect in the fall. Cass
Bielski, a regulatory analyst at Edison Electric Institute, a Washington,
D.C., industry group, called the settlement "cutting-edge news in the
industry" and "unusual in a state that has not adopted electric retail
choice" as a policy.

Under the settlement, four smaller users -- including Intel Corp. of Santa
Clara, Calif., which operates a plant near Tacoma -- were given the option
of seeking alternative electricity providers or buying power from Puget
Sound Energy at rates capped at either $225 per megawatt hour or $100 less
than the spot price on a major Northwestern U.S. spot-price market. Two even
smaller users will simply buy their power at regulated rates.

Puget Sound Energy also agreed not to recover any revenue lost because of
the settlement from other residential and commercial ratepayers.

Write to Robert Gavin at robert.gavin@wsj.com


Carolyn,

Please forward all original documents to me.  Thanks,  Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/29/2000 03:47:42 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>,
"'Fred.Mitro@enron.com'" <Fred.Mitro@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: InterGen Guaranty Agreements

Kay:

I have just received from John Jones one executed original of each of four
InterGen Guaranty Agreements.  Please advise of handling instructions.

Also, with regard to the form of disbursement instruction letter prepared by
Lari Paradee, I have advised her that the disbursement instruction letter
should not provide for execution by InterGen, but should instead provide for
joint execution by both ENA and SEL.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Start Date: 1/22/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012212.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Start Date: 10/20/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Vince,

Took a few days to get back to you.  This guys works for the US Sales VP, our contact at Samsung.  Samsung is going to send him out to review the business and present his ideas.  I'll let you know how it goes.

-Brad

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Brooks, Bradford
Cc:	Simmons, Michael
Subject:	FW: Thank you

Brad,

I am sending you a resume of a student from Berkeley you may
find interesting.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sam \(Seung Hyun\) Cho" <scho@haas.berkeley.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sam+20+5C+28Seung+20Hyun+5C+29+20Cho+22+20+3Cscho+40haas+2Eberkeley+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 2:22 AM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
Subject:	Thank you

Dear Dr.Kaminski:

It was really nice to talk to you tonight.   Tonight, my willingness to explore Enron's innovative culture became much  stronger.  To your question, "who will sell it?", my answer is "Enron will  sell it."  My current idea is to create  hedging portfolio against DRAM price movement and sell the insurance based on  the payoffs from the hedging portfolio.

FYI, I attach my resume.  Thank you very  much.

Best regards,

Sam (Seung Hyun) Cho
MBA / MFE, 2002
Walter  A. Haas School of Business
University of California,  Berkeley
 - ChoSamEnron.doc << File: ChoSamEnron.doc >>


thanks.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 09:42 AM
---------------------------

Tricia Spence
02/02/2001 05:29 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Promotions Luncheon for Managers

I will be unable to attend due to an off-site customer meeting.

Thanks
Tricia Spence
3-4222


-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:53 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: CGT Retainage Reduction Effective Feruary 1, 2002

                       COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                JANUARY 23, 2002

Notice ID: 3430
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

On January 15, 2002, Columbia Gulf made a filing to the FERC to reduce the
percentage of gas retained for Company Use and Unaccounted For Gas.  This
reduction if approved by the Commission, will be effective February 1, 2002.
Columbia Gulf will make its usual annual Transportation Retainage Adjustment
filing on March 1, 2002, with changes to be effective April 1, 2002.

The new retainage percentages are:

Mainline        2.470%
Onshore         0.422%
Offshore        0.302%
Offsystem-Onshore - no change


In our Wednesday morning (3/20/02) meeting we discussed sending a demand letter to this CP.  Did that letter go out?  If not, let me know what the hold-up is and I'll do what I can to help move things forward.

Thanks

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Steve and Lindy, as I mentioned in our staff meeting, it is probably not
going to be possible to solve our max rate cap dilemma by making a tariff
filing unless we can 1) get FERC to change its mind about its policy that
recourse rates always be available as an alternative to negotiated rates or
2) prove that Transwestern lacks market power and should therefore be allowed
to charge market based rates.

The following is a very brief outline of what would be required to prove lack
of market power.  A warning:  lack of market power is very difficult to
prove.  Koch, a pipeline that most in the industry would agree does lack
market power, tried and failed.  The deck is already stacked against us in
TW's case given the withholding of capacity by El Paso's affiliate and the
price conditions in California.  However, we do need to analyze the
possibilities for TW, if not to the Cal. border, then on other parts of our
system.  Additionally, we need to discuss acceptable incentives for shippers
to pay negotiated rates if we do not end up changing our tariff.

Would you be availabile on Tuesday to discuss this?  Please let me know.  In
the meantime, here is a summary of FERC's policy on market based rates.

***

To obtain authority to charge market based rates, TW would first have to
request a declaratory order, and in its application provide information
showing it meets the requirements outlined below.  If the Commission finds
all requirements have been met, it will issue an order and TW would then make
the appropriate tariff filing to put market based rates into effect.

Application for declaratory order must include:

1.  Detailed description of the services proposed for market-based rate
treatment.  I assume in our case it would be firm transportation service.

2.  A statement defining the relevant product and geographic markets
necessary for establishing the applicant lacks market power with respect to
the services at issue.  The Commission requires a narrow definition of the
market("firm transportation" is probably narrow enough, but for our purposes
we might want to narrow it down more (i.e., firm transportation East of
Thoreau).  We have to define substitute services available to shippers(other
pipelines are a "good substitute" only if shippers can obtain the same
quality of service on a timely basis, and if the other pipelines offer such
service at a price that would deter TW from raising its prices more than
10%.  All relevant "origin markets" must be defined (Panhandle; West Texas)
as well as "destination markets," and alternatives for shippers in those
markets identified.  Transportation alternatives are only good alternatives
if they provide a netback to shippers that is roughly the same as if they
used TW.  Note that the Commission has rejected capacity release as a good
alternative since it does not guarantee a shipper its desired contract
quantity.

3.  Market share and HHI calculations; discussion of other relevant
competitive factors.  Commission looks at size of market share, mitigating
factors such as ease of entry, and market concentration as measured by HHI.
Market concentration has to be calculated for each relevant receipt point and
delivery point.  HHI is calculated by adding up the total market share and
squaring it.  There is a presumption of no ease of entry for transportation
services  because of the expense involved in constructing facilities.

4.  Proposal for accounting for costs and revenues.


Mo,

I know today is bad for you with the June contacts for the NY-MEX but what
about a late breakfast tomorrow.  I have no car but we could meet in the
Village or something...what do you think?

Joseph F. Reid
Accenture
617-454-8636 W
617-515-7679 C

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Thanks.  I will put the balls in the mail today.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ron Bennett <sueron@anv.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:00 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; sueron@anv.net
Subject:	Enron golf balls-purchase

$13.50 has been sent to paypal:

Send balls to:

Ron Bennett
Warren-Walker School
2150 Windmill Parkway
Henderson, NV 89074

Please inform me of date and type of shipping.

Ron

"Love, Phillip M." wrote:

> Congratulations on winning the auction on Ebay for the sleeve of Pinnacle Golf Balls.  Please let me know if you will be paying by PayPal(alove@houston.rr.com) or money order/cashier's check.  I will mail the balls priority mail as soon as I receive payment.  Thanks again and use this email address if you reply before this evening, alove@housotn.rr.com is my home email and I can not access it from work.  Thanks again and look forward to hearing from you soon.
> PL
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Thanks.

See you Friday!

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Saibi@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Saibi@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:05 AM
To: mmorales@arnel.com
Subject: RE: Hi!

Sorry, Continental.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Maylynn Morales" <mmorales@arnel.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:04 AM
   To:     Saibi, Eric
   Subject:  RE: Hi!

   What airline?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Eric.Saibi@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Saibi@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:46 AM
   To: mmorales@arnel.com
   Subject: RE: Hi!

   HI, i'm scheduled to arrive at 1:25 PM on Nov 30, flight 1287.  Looking
   forward to it!

   Eric

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Maylynn Morales" <mmorales@arnel.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:43 AM
      To:     Saibi, Eric
      Cc:     toriarules@aol.com
      Subject:  Hi!

      Hi Eric

      Quick question?

      What time will you be arriving at LAX?  I need to know so that I can
   ask
      for part of the day off.

      Thanks,
      Maylynn J

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Can you check with Lindy to see what the capacity was at in the plan for next year? When does the capacity become available?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Harris, Steven
Subject: RE: TW Capacity

The spreads don't support it, but I believe we have Amoco and Aquila bidding max rate for the 12 posted months.  Merit's (Southern) bid was lower in rate and but 10 times the term.  Hmmm...NPV?!?!

-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:16 PM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Subject: RE: TW Capacity

Michelle, what did we think we would get for this? Max? What was the term of the capacity that was posted?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Lohman, TK
Cc: Lindberg, Lorraine; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly
Subject: FW: TW Capacity

Bid on Sempra's ROFR capacity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wadle, Rick [mailto:rick.wadle@mirant.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:51 PM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Cc: Hogan, John
Subject: TW Capacity

Michelle,

As per our conversation, Mirant Americas Energy Marketing submits the
following bid for capacity:

Term 10 years
Receipt Point: Northwest Pipeline (POI 500533)
Delivery Point: I/B Link (POI 500545)
Volume 30,000 Dth/day
Rate: $0.055 Dth

Thanks for your help

Rick Wadle


I'm not sure who should respond. PLease let me know which one of you decides
to respond
Thanks
Jen
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
09:59 AM ---------------------------

"Chuck Pavlica" <cpavlica@enerad.com> on 02/05/2001 08:24:29 AM
To: "Prospective Natural Gas Supplier" <cpavlica@enerad.com>
cc:
Subject: Request for Proposal

Attached is a Request for Proposal on behalf of  Gulf Chemical &
Metallurgical Corporation in Freeport, Texas.?  Estimated daily consumption
is 867 MMBtu/d.? Proposals are due by February  16, 2001 at 5:00p.m.
?
Chuck Pavlica
Energy Advantage Corporation
440 Benmar Dr., Suite 1060
Houston, TX? 77060
(281) 447-7376 ext. 117
(281) 447-7310 fax
email:? cpavlica@enerad.com
 - Gulf Chemical RFP.pdf


The Global Government Affairs department meeting has been cancelled.

Thanks and please call me if you have any questions.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Assad, Sergio; Assaf, Lisa; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Bestard, Jose; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Braz, Gisele; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Cooper, Adam N; Crowther, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Davies, Philip; Dawson, Paul; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Elms, Nick; Fitzgibbon, Tom; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Grimes, Michael; Guerrero, Janel; Haizmann, Jan; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hennemeyer, Paul; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huertas, Alfredo; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hughes, Llewelyn; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Imai, Makiko; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keenan, Amber; Keene, Patrick; Kimura, Takashi; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Milano, Pamela; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reis, Jose Lucio; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Sampaio, Fred; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Styles, Peter; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Van Biert, Teun; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Watanabe, Mika; Wood, Doug; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Global Government Affairs December Department Meeting

I want to update everyone on the next Global Government Affairs Department Meeting.  It will take place as previously scheduled.  See below for details:

Location:	The Woodlands Country Club
		2301 North Millbend Drive
		The Woodlands, TX  77380
		281-367-1100

Date:		December 6, 2001 (Departmental Dinner at the The Woodlands Country Club)
Time:		6:30 PM (CST)

Date:		December 7, 2001 (Department Meeting)
Time:		8:00 AM - 4:00 PM

I have a block of rooms reserved for overnight guests.  Please let me know of your plans to attend, the date you will be arriving, and I will reserve a room for you.

I will update everyone with more details as soon as I get them.

Thanks and look forward to seeing everyone next month.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		10/6/2000
Task Start Date:	10/6/2000


Please print these out for me, create a file for them called EnronOnline
Pipeline Capacity and bring it to me.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 09:40 AM -----

	ESanford@milbank.com
	08/22/2000 09:02 PM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc: EFeo@milbank.com, SKramer@milbank.com, ESanford@milbank.com
		 Subject: EnronOnline - pipeline capacity - CFTC issues

Mark,

Further to our telephone call of last week with Ed Feo and Steve Kramer,
attached please find a draft memo discussing certain CFTC regulatory issues
relating to multilateral online trading systems for pipeline capacity.? Also
attached are three CFTC no-action letters, the first of which (Channel 4)
contemplates transactions in pipeline capacity, as discussed in the memo.?
The other two letters (Altra and QuickTrade) relate primarily to natural gas,
although the relevant CFTC regulatory issues appear to be similar.? Please
feel free to call me at 212-530-5414 with any questions you may have about
the attached documents.? I look forward to working with you and EnronOnline
to address these issues.

Regards,
Eric Sanford

 <<#7249623 v3 - EnronOnline - Pipeline Capacity Memo.doc>>

 <<1994 CFTC Letter 94-58 Channel 4.doc>>

 <<1998 CFTC Letter 98-31 QuickTrade.pdf>>

 <<1997 CFTC Letter 97-93 Altra.pdf>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - #7249623 v3 - EnronOnline - Pipeline Capacity Memo.doc
 - 1994 CFTC Letter 94-58 Channel 4.doc
 - 1998 CFTC Letter 98-31 QuickTrade.pdf
 - 1997 CFTC Letter 97-93 Altra.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

"The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>@ls.eei.org on
11/08/2000 10:28:43 AM
Please respond to "The Alliance of Energy Suppliers" <alliance@eei.org>
Sent by: bounce-app-ippexecs-33275@ls.eei.org
To: "Generation and Power Marketing Executives" <app-ippexecs@ls.eei.org>
cc:
Subject: Alliance FERC Alert-Regional Market Reports

Attached for your information are:

1.  The FERC orders regarding the meeting to be held Thursday, November 9.
2.  Annoucement of a hearing in San Diego on November 14.
3.  FERC report on bulk power markets in the Southeast Region
4.  FERC report on bulk power markets in the Midwest Region
5.  FERC report on bulk power markets in Northeast Region

These files will also be made available on the Alliance of Energy Suppliers
web site - http://www.eei.org/alliance
Should you have any questions concerning these reports, contact Jack Cashin
at 202-508-5499, or jcashin@eei.org

Nancy Tarr
Manager, Business Development
ntarr@eei.org

 - FERC 11-14 hearing.pdf
 - nov 9 panels.pdf
 - FERC.Southeast.PDF
 - FERCMidwest.PDF
 - FERCNortheast.PDF


pls print for me.  thanks  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/08/2001
02:32 PM ---------------------------

"SCIENTECH IssueAlert" <IssueAlert@scientech.com> on 03/08/2001 04:57:43 AM
To:
cc:

Subject: Problems Mount for Sierra Pacific Resources, Acquisition of Portland
General Appears Uncertain

Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The CIS Conferencec provides utility management personnel unequaled insight
and current information on Customer Relationship Management (CRM),
E-Commerce, Technologies and Marketing. Fifty-four sessions conducted by
utility industry representatives will focus on issues facing the industry.
Over 100 companies will exhibit the latest technologies and services.

Former President George Bush is our Honored Keynote Speaker

www.cisconference.org

Identify and discuss current issues confronting the energy and
telecommunications industries at the Center for Public Utilities' annual
spring conference. How should these problems be resolved? What tradeoffs are
made with each solution? Join panel discussions led by utility executives and
PUC commissioners in Santa Fe, NM, March 25-28th, at "Current Issues
Challenging the Utility Industry." To register, or for more information,
contact Jeanette Walter, Associate Director, at 505-646-3242 or
505-646-4876.  The Center for Public Utilities is part of New Mexico State
University, presenting programs sanctioned by the National Association of
Regulatory Commissioners (NARUC).
For advertising information, email Nancy Spring, or call (505)244-7613.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 8, 2001

Problems Mount for Sierra Pacific Resources,
Acquisition of Portland General Appears Uncertain

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

The probability appears to be getting smaller that Sierra Pacific Resources
(NYSE: SRP) will complete its $3.1 billion acquisition of Portland General
Electric (NYSE: PGB) from Enron (NYSE: ENE). Enron disclosed in an 8K filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Feb. 27 that the sale of
Portland General had been delayed because of "recent events" in California
and Nevada that affected Sierra Pacific. Walt Higgins, chair and CEO of
Sierra Pacific Resources, told Wall Street analysts that the acquisition
agreement will terminate if it has not closed by May 1.

Analysis: Yesterday I wrote about the apparent collapse of the merger between
Consolidated Edison and Northeast Utilities (NU). Now, another high-profile
merger appears to be unraveling. As with the Con Edison / NU deal, the
problem facing Sierra Pacific Resources' pending purchase of Portland General
from Enron is based in economics. Namely, it appears that Sierra Pacific
Resources' recent financial problems have cast doubt on the company's ability
to complete its purchase of Portland General. This is not a good development
for Sierra Pacific Resources, as the financial and legal implications of this
potentially dead acquisition could exacerbate the company's current financial
problems.

First, let me provide some background on this deal. The origin of Sierra
Pacific Resources' attempt to acquire Portland General date back to November
1999. Enron had purchased the company in 1997 as a strategic move to
facilitate its intent to play a major role in the retail markets of
California and the Pacific Northwest. At the time, Enron saw itself as a
prototype for the future of the energy industry, adding transmission and
distribution capabilities as well as more diversified fuel resources to its
already successful wholesale marketing core. Stymied by the slow start of
competition in California and Oregon, Enron underwent a transformation in its
corporate philosophy. Under the growing direction of Jeffrey Skilling, Enron
no longer believed that it needed to own hard assets to retain its place in
the top tier of energy companies. That philosophy has served Enron well, as
its success in nearly all of its business sectors has been well documented.

Yet, Enron's transformation opened the door for Sierra Pacific Resources, a
relatively small and regionally based holding company, to move in for a
purchase of Portland General. Owning Portland General made more sense for
Sierra Pacific Resources than it did for Enron. Portland General, which
provides electric service to over 700,000 customers in the Portland-Salem
area, was viewed as a good acquisition target as it would help Sierra Pacific
Resources to gain scale and a foothold in two fast-growing states (Nevada and
Oregon). Sierra Pacific Resources agreed to pay Enron $2.1 billion for
Portland General, which included $2.02 billion in cash and assumption of
Enron's $80 million merger payment obligation. In addition, Sierra Pacific
Resources agreed to assume $1 billion in Portland General debt and preferred
stock, taking the total value of the purchase to $3.1 billion. Portland
General appeared happy with the scheduled sale from Enron, acknowledging that
its own core business "delivering safe and reliable power with a customer
service focus" was more in line with Sierra Pacific Resources.

However, a number of economic factors on Sierra Pacific Resources' side of
the table seem to be thwarting this acquisition. As I discussed in the Feb.
22 IssueAlert (available at www.consultrci.com), Sierra Pacific Resources
reported a significant fourth-quarter loss ($18.2 million) as a result of
soaring costs of power in the western United States. The company incurred
losses as a direct result of "the growing and unrecovered cost of purchased
power in the volatile wholesale market." As a result, Sierra Pacific
Resources filed with state regulators for an emergency rate increase.
"Without some rate relief, the cost of fuel and power is close to crippling
our ability to serve the needs of our customers," said Mark Ruelle, the
company's chief financial officer. The company attributed the latest
quarter's loss to nearly $258 million of unanticipated fuel and purchased
power costs.

Specifically, Sierra Pacific Resources reported a 4Q 2000 loss of $18.2
million, or 23 cents a share. This compared with a profit of $26.8 million,
or 39 cents a share, excluding a $56 million deferred energy write-off a year
ago. Including the write-off, the company reported a loss of $29.2 million,
or 42 cents a share, in 4Q 1999. For year-end 2000, the company reported a
net loss of $39.8 million or 51 cents per share, a 177-percent drop from
1999.

In addition, the company's stock has fallen steadily over the last few weeks
(at one point, dropping 11.8 percent to $10.80 on the New York Stock Exchange
Feb. 7). At the close of trading on March 7, shares of Sierra Pacific
Resources were priced at $13.80, which is still down from its 52-week high of
$19.43 and book value of $17.82. The drop in stock price could make it
difficult for Sierra Pacific Resources to secure the financing necessary to
complete the purchase of Portland General.

Meanwhile, Sierra Pacific Resources' available cash flow could be impacted by
possible restrictions placed on the sale of its power plants. The Public
Utility Commission of Nevada (PUCN) mandated divestiture as a condition of
the 1999 merger between Nevada Power Co. and Sierra Pacific Power Co, which
created the holding company Sierra Pacific Resources. Toward that end, the
holding company and its wholly owned utility subsidiaries commenced a public
auction of approximately 2,900 MW of power generation facilities. Of Sierra
Pacific Resources' nine power plants, which are mostly fired by natural gas
and coal, seven have been entered into sales agreements to companies such as
Dynegy and NRG and will be sold upon final regulatory approval.

However, over the last few weeks, there has been growing concern that Nevada
regulators would not approve pending sales or authorize the sale of
additional power plants by Sierra Pacific Resources, thus preventing the
company from using the proceeds to pay for the acquisition of Portland
General. Perhaps out of fears about depleting the Nevada's power supply, the
Attorney General's Bureau of Consumer Protection, the Southern Nevada Water
Authority and the AFL-CIO have urged that the sale of the plants be delayed
or canceled. Further, Nevada Governor Kenny Guinn has called on the PUCN to
reconsider the 1999 order that required Sierra Pacific Resources to sell the
plants owned by its two utilities, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific Power. Any
available cash that Sierra Pacific Resources was planning to use from the
power plant sales to support its acquisition of Portland General may not
materialize if the sales agreements are delayed or terminated.

Ironically, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific Power Co. just received approval
from the PUCN to secure $1.4 billion in bank loans, bond financing and
preferred securities. However, due to agreements that the utilities
previously made, none of the borrowed money may be used, directly or
indirectly, to financially support its parent's acquisition of Portland
General.

Thus, Sierra Pacific Resources seems to be between a rock and a hard place
regarding this purchase, which it apparently still wants to complete. It
would appear that Sierra Pacific Resources will have difficulty financing the
purchase of Portland General due to the combination of its significant
financial losses, plunging stock prices and possible restrictions against the
sale of its power plants. Presumably, these are the "recent events" to which
Enron referred in its SEC filing.

It is fairly clear that Enron no longer wishes to own Portland General and
believes that the company does not fit into its strategy for continuing
growth. What remains in question, however, is what will happen if Sierra
Pacific Resources' pending acquisition is not completed by the May 1
deadline, thus terminating the sales agreement. The problems associated with
the Con Edison / NU merger are leading to litigation. One can't help but
think that lawsuits would be inevitable in the Enron / Portland General /
Sierra Pacific Resources case as well, as Enron presumably would seek to be
compensated in some way for the $3.1 billion that the deal includes.

Further complicating matters for Sierra Pacific Resources is a growing
movement to municipalize the electric markets in Las Vegas and Henderson,
Nev. On Jan. 11, the Southern Nevada Water Authority suggested that the
agency could become a public power authority. Pat Mulroy, general manager of
the water authority, recommended that the agency buy power on wholesale
markets and possibly generate electricity from some of its own power plants
to serve cities in the area. Efforts to municipalize electric systems in the
southern half of the state could potentially gain momentum if Sierra Pacific
Resources' financial problems worsen.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.