Good morning, everyone!  Thank you for completing last week's assignments
and/or promptly communicating your status to me. This is a reminder that
your topic assignments for this week are due by the EOD this Friday,
10/19/01.  Please send them to Monica at email address:
Monica.L.Brown@Accenture.com

Assignment Status:
Berney Aucoin: 1/1 Complete
Andy Lewis: 1/1 Complete
Mark Reese: 1/1 Complete
Dutch Quigley: 0/1 Incomplete. ETC: this Friday for both assignments.
Ed McMichael: 0/1 Incomplete. ETC: this Friday for both assignments.

Important Notes / Helpful Hints:
****1. Please note in your assignments when you use additional resources
other than the BRM course material and your own knowledge. This will
significantly help us deter any copyright infringements. Thanks
2.  Although you are ultimately responsible for these assignments, you can
ask people who work for you to help you with them. Please keep in mind that
if you choose this method, you should review the content before handing in
the assignment.

Finally, and most importantly, please keep in mind that the completion of
these assignments significantly impacts the ability of our BRM project to
stay on schedule and within budget. If you are unable to complete this
assignment, please notify me or Monica ahead of time and provide an
estimated time for completion.

Thank you and keep up the good work!

Sheri A. Righi
Accenture
Human Performance Service Line
Hartford - One Financial Plaza
Direct Dial: 860 756 2245
VPN & Octel: 765 2245
e-mail: sheri.a.righi@Accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: Counihan, Rick [mailto:rick.counihan@greenmountain.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:54 PM
To: ARM List Serve; Douglass, Dan; Fairchild, Tracy; Plotkin, Norm
Subject: No evidence of hold at PUC

All,

I spoke to a Commission advisor today who told me that there has been no
official notice of holding the DA decision on Thursday.

Norm, are you checking with Steve Simpson to see if Hertzberg will call
on this?

Rick Counihan
Vice President and General Manager
Green Mountain Energy Company
415/439-5310 tel
415/439-5320 fax
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com


Wed 12:30 ?


MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: October 31, 2001

RE: EPSA Leave-Behind on Market-Based Rate Authority
      ?Conference Call on Friday, November 2nd at 11:00 a.m.
       (EST)

Last Friday, we held a conference call to discuss EPSA's position on possible changes to FERC's market-based rate authorization standard and the Commission's recently released staff report outlining several alternatives to the currently used hub-and-spoke method.  Please review the attached draft, which has been extensively revised based on last week's call.  We have scheduled a conference call on Friday, November 2nd at 11:00 a.m. (EST) to discuss this draft and hope to be able to go forward after that call.  To access the call, please dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA Call. If you have any questions, comments or edits before the call, please contact Julie Simon at 202-628-8200 or jsimon@epsa.org.

Attachment

 - MBR leave behind draft 2.doc


It looks like Thursday is fine.  So, how about we meet in the lobby at 11:30.

Let me know.

-Eric

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           01/04/2001 02:22 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Lunch

About time!  As always, you know I try to change things.  I have a meeting I
need to attend on Friday, 1/12.  Would Thursday, 1/11 work?  I really am
looking forward to it.  let me know.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           01/04/2001 12:55 PM

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lunch

Brenda,

I know that I have mentioned a lunch several times and have finally gotten
around to coordinating it (thanks, Dave).  How does Friday, Jan. 12. sound?

-Eric


yes.

	Stacy Carey <SCAREY@ISDA.ORG>
	04/23/2001 04:54 PM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Financial Times Article on Electronic Trading

Hello Mark -- Andrei Postelnicu, Financial Times, will contact you regarding
the electronic trading article.  For reference, his number is 212-641-6339.

Mark, in cases where we receive similar requests in the future, may I put
reporters in contact with you directly? (with the understanding that,
depending upon the issue, you may or may not decide to speak with them)

Also, feel free to let me know if you would like any of the ISDA staff to
join your call with Andrei. Many thanks -- Stacy

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [mailto:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:40 PM
To: SCAREY@ISDA.ORG
Subject: Re: Financial Times Article on Electronic Trading

Yes, I would be happy to.   Mark Haedicke

                    Stacy Carey

                    <SCAREY@ISDA.        To:     Mark Haedicke
<Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>, Damian Kissane
                    ORG>                 <damian.kissane@db.com>, Jonathan
Moulds <jonm@crt.com>
                                         cc:     Robert Pickel
<RPICKEL@isda.org>, Ruth Ainslie
                    04/23/2001           <RAinslie@isda.org>

                    12:11 PM             Subject:     Financial Times
Article on Electronic Trading

The FT has contacted ISDA regarding our contribution to an upcoming article
they are writing on the emergence of electronic trading.

ISDA staff will give them regulatory background in US and Europe.  I
thought
it might be worthwhile for them to hear a business/legal perspective as
well.

Would you be interested in speaking with the reporter within the next
couple
of days?  Please advise.  Many thanks!

Stacy Carey
Policy Director  & Media Relations
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org


TFF Participants,

We are looking forward to seeing everyone in San Antonio this Friday.
Attached is a welcome letter that indicates the meeting room and describes
the two evenings (Friday dinner and tour of the Alamo and Saturday barbeque
dinner at a ranch outside of San Antonio).  We have arranged for five
horses for the brave at heart and a hayride for the interested so come with
jeans and boots.

See you Friday

John
 - Welcome1.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


please match the following deals for jan feb and mar

deal 142727 with 204779


Jordan H. Mintz has been named Vice President & General Counsel for Enron
Global Finance and will be leaving the Enron North America tax group.

Stephen H. Douglas, Sr. Director, will head up tax services for ENA.  Steve
came to ENA's tax planning group from the Charlotte, North Carolina firm
Fennebresque, Clark, Swindell & Hay in May, 1998.  He was previously
affiliated with the Skadden, Arps law firm in New York City.  Steve received
his BS degree in Finance and Mathematics from Trinity University (1987), his
JD from the University of Texas School of Law (1990) and his LLM in Taxation
from the New York University School of Law (1993).

Please join me in congratulating Jordan and Steve in their new roles.

Robert J. Hermann, Managing Director & General Tax Counsel


I have not spoken with him, but spoke to John Gillis and several NEPCO people on the project.  I will follow up with Keith.  FYI I am thinking of submitting a non-binding proposal tomorrow to buy the project  (I am preparing a few slides for your review on the value proposition).

Louise Kitchen
04/05/2001 09:08 AM
To:	Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Goldendale

Do you already speak to this guy or do you want me to ring him to ensure we are dealing with this project appropriately.

Louise
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 10:55 AM ---------------------------
From:	Keith Dodson@ENRON on 04/04/2001 06:21 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON, johng@nepco.com

Subject:	Re: Goldendale

Louise,

Calpine, NRG, Reliant, and Enron have expressed interest.  Calpine has been in the lead, but that complicates NEPCO's (and Enron's via the CTG)  position as RAC has a moratorium on taking any Calpine risk. As of today, the leader is NRG based on their submission. There is a new permitting process in the Northwest that will significantly slow new projects. This project is already permitted and not subject to the slowdown.

 John Gillis attempted to call you last week to explain the details of the opportunity.  John has a relationship with the developer and  is ready to discuss at your convenience.  His phone is 425-415-3100.

Keith Dodson

	Louise Kitchen@ECT 04/04/2001 12:04 PM 	   To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON  cc:   Subject: Goldendale

I understand financing fell through on this project and we have Chris Calger's group looking at the project - can you please keep me in the loop on the way forward on this project for NEPCO to ensure the best solution for Enron.

Thanks

Louise

<Embedded StdOleLink>


547298, broker is not showing


Please forward a credit worksheet for the attached.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001 02:06 PM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	04/06/2001 02:02 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gas Supply Contract

----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001 02:02 PM -----

	Marcus Nettelton@ENRON
	03/21/2001 04:01 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gas Supply Contract

Dan

Further to our earlier conversation the following is the name of the
counterparty who will be buying the gas: PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC

Marcus


whatever prentice says.

Prentice Sellers <psellers@pacbell.net> on 06/25/2001 05:45:14 PM
To: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich'"
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>
cc:

Subject: RE: will you babysit us?

Probably.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:14 PM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice Sellers
Subject: will you babysit us?

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


John, this is a Skilling issue - Charlene and myself are going to talk to him
about several changes in the next couple of weeks.

Regards
Delainey


Gentlemen -

A few updates:

We hope to file the petition on Monday in the Bombay High Court seeking a
ruling that the MERC does not have jurisdiction over the PPA and the current
disputes between MSEB and Dabhol Power Company.

The Dabhol lenders have planned 3 days of meetings in Singapore this coming
week and we will attend these meetings.  Our lenders seem to be increasingly
nervous.  They may try to cure the construction contract defaults (over $30
million would be required in mid-June).  While we do not relish having the
construction contracts fall away, we do not believe that funding is prudent
at this point.  MSEB has torn up the PPA and stated that it will not
cooperate with Phase II power station testing, the only real remaining
function under the power plant construction contract.

A few insolvency/creditors' rights lawyers from Skadden will be here on
Wednesday to discuss Dabhol creditor remedies and possible DPC defenses (both
in India and the U.S.).  A lawyer from Susman Godfrey is scheduled to join us
at that meeting.

Bruce


three sounds good. :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causholli, Monika
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 12:28 PM
To:	Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa
Subject:	today's meeting

Hello Maria Teresa,

Eugenio is teaching a class on Black Scholes pricing at 2pm today. Can we meet at 3 pm today or if you can't do it today we can leave it for Monday.

thanks,
Monika


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Andrews, Wayne
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	DL-GenesysAllTeam
Subject:	FW: Top 10 activities to consider while recovering from the Enron debacle

You know your company has "made it" when:
You hear the christian radio station in town asking for prayer
They start relating how many shares it would take to buy a hotdog at the stadium
Your friends won't let you pay for dinner
You can judge how good of a day it will be by the number of news trucks in front of the building
You start eying the parmasan cheese contianer, how long it will sustain you and if the resturaunt would miss it
The waiter immediatly offers you a glass of wine when he finds out who you work(ed) for
You spend more time trying to convince vendors you are still in business (pipelines) than actually doing business
The CNN news truck takes up residence in front of the building
You toy with the idea of grabbing a box and walking out the front door, so you can give the poor news guys something to do
The number of police officers increases in the building
You take the remaining cents/dollar from your 401k and invest in beer stocks
Wondering if anyone would notice you leaving with a comfy mesh chair under your arm
People's party planning skills are greatly enhanced due to the over use during the day
The waiter asks if you would like a refill on water you inquire if it is free
You look at the change in your pocket and wonder if you should go in for a couple more shares

10.  Learn to make your own clothes, cut hair for family and friends, and other old-fashioned ways to reduce costs.

9.  Rent a mini-bus to give tours of River Oaks, pointing out the homes of Fast Andy Fastow, Uncle Ben Glisan, Little Jeffy Skilling, etc. in case anyone wants to return on their own to give personal notes of thanks for freeing up all this time to be with family over the holidays.

8.  Audition for next Survivor show.

7.  Harness your chi.

6.  Start therapy to unlearn key Enron phrases "world's leading (fill in the blank)", etc.

5.  Take advantage of the proximity of the world-class Texas Medical Center to participate in some of those extended drug studies - they often provide food and housing during some of the psychotropic trials.

4.  Familiarize yourself with Ebay so that you may unload some of your Enron logo wear, or other small electronic items which may have accidentally ended up at your home when Price Waterhouse seized the building.  (And remember: looting is a crime.)

3.  If necessary, make amends with your parents or in-laws - they're old enough that their houses are probably paid for, and likely won't let your kids starve or become homeless.

2.  Remind yourself that, unless you are a child, no one is ultimately responsible for your health, wealth or happiness except you.

1.  Keep your perspective:  if you have love, religion, health, then you're as rich as you've always been, only slightly less encumbered by material wealth.


I talked with Russ.  I told him if he wanted a 5 year, we needed $.26.  We could consider going a little lower if he extended his term to 10 years....I told him we really need $.24 to make it work for 10.  He will run the numbers and call me in the morning.   Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: 8772374503@pagenetmessage.net
[mailto:8772374503@pagenetmessage.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Re: DCF

Reply: Reply from Steve

If they will do ten years then that would probably be ok. I am still concerned about James using December as a start date. We can hopefully discuss tomorrow.

Orig:
> Fr:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com
> Sub:DCF
> Steve,
>
> James ran numbers.  $.22 for 10 yr. for 43,300/d is a DCF of 16.57% with
> no resubscriptions.  This looks better than any of the 5 year cases on
> either a 120/d case or 150/d case.  Thoughts?  We have not approached
> Duke with a 10 yr term yet.  Thanks, Kim and Michelle
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 07:19 AM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/10/2001 03:47 PM

		 To: Robert Vote@ENRON, Randy Pais@Enron, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA  - Employee Payroll for
11 April

Enrique Valero, our onsite project management, just sent the attached note.
Most urgently, payday for about 300 employees is tomorrow, and the employees
are expecting this check before the Easter holy week holiday starts.

If possible without violating the order, , we would like to get the employees
paid. Bob, I can't remember how we solved this last time out, but I remember
it was an issue. Please call so we can discuss.

 JWVS

	Enrique Valero
	04/10/2001 02:28 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Simm Powell/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Brand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, William
Fitch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA
served on EECC on April 10

John:

Please give further advise as how to operate down here in Tampico. We are in
the middle of (3) Projects, where we (Enron/Cigsa) have commitments to pay
out that are project related:
Labor
Labor Taxes
Materials
Consumables
Import Duties
Miscellaneous
Payment for Transportation of Structures (Barge/Tug)

The funds to pay the above are in CIGSA Construccion's name, although I am
one of the two authorized signatures in the bank, and no funds can be moved
unless I sign a check.

What is the impact of the below message on the above categories?

Also, what about when we CIGSA/Enron/ODB (CAByL) receive payments? CIGSA
invoices CAByL and then the money is wired to Enron. What is the impact on
this?

Please advise as soon as possible.

Regards,
EV

04/10/2001 02:14 PM
Mark Brand
Mark Brand
Mark Brand
04/10/2001 02:14 PM
04/10/2001 02:14 PM
To: Enrique Valero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Simm
Powell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

Enrique/Simm:

Please see John Schwartzenburg's note below.  We are to halt any further
payments to, or on behalf of, CIGSA, effectively immediately until further
direction by Mike Pearson.

Mark

----- Forwarded by Mark Brand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/10/2001 02:10 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg
	04/10/2001 01:53 PM

		 To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Kenneth L Bean/HOU/EES@EES, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian
Stanley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth L
Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
steved@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, danielh@nepco.com, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Randy Pais@Enron, Jim
Desrochers/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia Santos@Enron, Wyndel McNamara@ENRON, Richard
Murphy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kristi
Dobbs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mayra Mendez@Enron, Angie
Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Vote@ENRON, Joseph T Grajewski/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

EECC has just been served with a writ of garnishment from the 333rd Judicial
District Court of Harris County  in connection with a judgment against
certain CIGSA entities. In the writ, the court very unambiguously and very
plainly commands that EECC is not to pay any debt or deliver any property to
CIGSA pending further orders from  the court. The writ was issued to enforce
an judgment  for $1.3 million awarded by the court against CIGSA in favor of
Richard P Estrada. EECC is also commanded to appear before the court and list
all funds/assets in our possession that might belong to CIGSA,  and to
disclose what other persons we know ofif any, that might have such funds or
assets.  The lawyer for Mr. Estrada is the same lawyer who successfully
garnished EECC in the past to collect sums owed other CIGSA judgment
creditors.

Please take this prohibition as applying even to cases where CIGSA might be
entitled to the money or the property under our contracts with them, or where
the funds or property are in joint venture acounts or custody in the US or
Mexico until we have had a chance to review matters in detail and make a more
accurate assessment. In the meantime, effective immediately, do not make ANY
payments to or on behalf of, or release ANY property to or on behalf of, any
CIGSA entity without first obtaining legal department approval. The court may
impose penalties for violations  of its garnishment order.

We will assemble an appropriate litigation team to work onthis matter. Randy
Pais will be handling this for EEOS legal. I suggest that Mike Pearson and
Mark Brand get the word out to the Project Management and Project Control
teams on  this matter ASAP.

JWVS


Please provide feedback with regards to Bang.

Thanks,
Johnny
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Delgado, Lydia
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; Hernandez, Juan; Garcia, Miguel L.; Laurent, Dean
Cc:	Palmer, Johnny; Weatherford, April
Subject:	REVISED - Final Schedule - Thursday, October 11, 2001 - Bang I. Tran
Importance:	High

Attached please find the following documents:

	 << File: Bang I. Tran  - Interview Schedule.doc >> 	 << File: Evaluation Form - Johnny Palmer.xls >> 	 << File: Bang I. Tran - resume.doc >>

Thank you,

Lydia Delgado

x3-9338


From Bart to Duke and Chloe

CANINE HOLIDAY ETIQUETTE

(Submitted by a "Daily Inspiration" subscriber)

1. Be especially patient with your humans during this time. They may
appear to be more stressed-out than usual and they will appreciate long
comforting dog leans.

2. They may come home with large bags of things they call gifts. Do not
assume that all the gifts are yours.

3. Be tolerant if your humans put decorations on you. They seem to get
some special kind of pleasure out of seeing how you look with fake
antlers.

4. They may bring a large tree into the house and set it up in a prominent
place and cover it with lights and decorations. Bizarre as this may seem
to you, it is an important ritual for your humans, so there are some
things you need to know:

- don't go to the bathroom on the tree

- don't drink water in the container that holds the tree

- mind your tail when you are near the tree

- if there are packages under the tree, even ones that smell interesting
or that have your    name on them, don't rip them open

- don't chew on the cord that runs from the funny-looking hole in the wall
to the tree

5. Your humans may occasionally invite lots of strangers to come visit
during this season. These parties can be lots of fun, but they also call
for some discretion on your part:

- not all strangers appreciate kisses and leans

- don't eat off the buffet table

- beg for goodies subtly

- be pleasant, even if unknowing strangers sit on your sofa

- don't drink out of glasses that are left within your reach

6. Likewise, your humans may take you visiting. Here your manners will
also be important:

- observe all the rules in #4 for trees that may be in other people's

houses. (4a is particularly important)

- respect the territory of other animals that may live in the house

- tolerate children

- turn on your charm big time

7. A big man with a white beard and a very loud laugh may emerge from your
fireplace in the middle of the night.

DO NOT BITE HIM!!

God bless you! Have a great Christmas filled with God's goodness.


*  Heard through sources that SBX 43 (SDG&E rate freeze) was signed by the
Governor today
*  However, the Legislature's web site still doesn't reflect the signing.
*  Let me know if you hear/see more news


Thank you for your kind e-mail. I think that Omni and Arp are the same in
importance. If you have the room, go with Omni.

Let me know if you will purchase any Pleasurscape pieces.

Yours, Karim

Karim Rashid Inc.
357 W 17th Street
New York NY 10011
p 212 929 8657
f 212 929 0247

www.core77.com/karimrashid

> From: John.Griffith@enron.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:36:41 -0600
> To: KarimRashid <karim@karimrashid.com>
> Subject: Re: Limited pieces
>
>
> Thanks for the email.
>
> I haven't had a chance to thank you for your trip to Houston.  It was a
> true pleasure to meet you.  I have a new excitement for design.  It is so
> nice to meet a person that is so down to earth.  I hope that you accomplish
> all of your goals.  You are truly deserving.
>
> The pieces look very beautiful at circline.  I am talking to them about the
> timing of getting an Arp sofa.  It is such a beautiful piece.  Do you think
> that the sofa's foam will last?  How is the fabric that IDEE uses?  Are you
> happy with the design?  Angie and I were looking into the Omni also.  How
> do you compare the two as far as design goes?  Is one more important than
> the other to you?
>
> Please keep me informed on your watch and eyewear designs coming this year.
> I am very excited.
>
> Once again thanks for the email and also your trip to Houston.  I hope that
> you can make it again soon.  Please call or email if you need anything.  My
> phone number is (713) 527-8743.
>
> Have a great week.  Talk to you soon.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Griffith
>
>


>  >> Subject: Women
>  >>
>  >> Women have strengths that amaze men. They carry children, they carry
>  >> hardships, they carry burdens but they hold happiness, love and joy.
>  >> They
>  >> smile when they want to scream. They sing when they want to cry. They
>  >> cry
>  >> when they are happy and laugh when they are nervous.They fight for
>  >> what they
>  >> believe in. They stand up for injustice. They don't take "no" for an
>  >> answer
>  >> when they believe there is a better solution.
>  >> They go without new shoes so their children can have them. They go to
>  >> the
>  >> doctor with a frightened friend. They love unconditionally. They cry
>  >> when
>  >> their children excel and cheer when their friends get awards. They are
>  >> happy
>  >> when they hear about a birth or a new marriage. Their hearts break
>  >> when a
>  >> friend dies. They have sorrow at the loss of a family member, yet they
>  >> are
>  >> strong when they think there is no strength left. They know that a hug
>  >> and a
>  >> kiss can heal a broken heart. Women come in all sizes, in all colors
>  >> and
>  >> shapes. They'll drive, fly, walk, run or e-mail you to show how much
>  >> they
>  >> care about you. The heart of a woman is what makes the world spin!
>  >> Women do
>  >> more than just give birth. They bring joy and hope. They give
>  >> compassion
>  >> and ideals. They give moral support to their family and friends. Women
>  >> have a
>  >> lot to say and a lot to give.
>  >> This has been sent to you from someone who respects you as a
>  >> woman.....pass
>  >> it along to your women friends to remind them how amazing they are...
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>
>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>Return-Path: <whitneypatterson@hotmail.com>
>Received: from  rly-zb02.mx.aol.com (rly-zb02.mail.aol.com [172.31.41.2])
>by
>air-zb03.mail.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 02:04:06
>-0500
>Received: from  hotmail.com (f16.law7.hotmail.com [216.33.237.16]) by
>rly-zb02.mx.aol.com (v67_b1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 02:03:55 1900
>Received: (qmail 6441 invoked by uid 0); 31 Jan 2000 07:03:55 -0000
>Message-ID: <20000131070355.6440.qmail@hotmail.com>
>Received: from 205.188.192.169 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
>     Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:03:54 PST
>X-Originating-IP: [205.188.192.169]
>From: "Whitney Patterson" <whitneypatterson@hotmail.com>
>To: psalmno131@aol.com, julie_a_armstrong@yahoo.com,
>courtney_adair@yahoo.com,
>         handonface@aol.com, beckycrum@hotmail.com, timt1972@aol.com,
>         Jennie_Orie@baylor.edu, Anna_Eady@baylor.edu, mfo228@aol.com,
>         dchunk1977@aol.com, freedom247@yahoo.com
>Subject: Women
>Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 01:03:54 CST
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Please take a look at this new communication tool at your earliest
convenience and give your input to one or more projects.  This is our
opportunity to provide meaningful creative input to the slew of new revenue
generation ideas that are flying around.  I appreciate your efforts to make
innovation as high a priority in the law group as it is throughout all of
Enron!  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/30/2000
03:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan McCarty & Steve Hotte                           10/26/2000 12:09 AM

Sent by: ETS General Announcement
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations
cc:

Subject: IdeaBank Website

Please read the attached document for information about an exciting new
website for ETS employees!


I assume, since C1's stock rose 10 points yesterday, that you struck a deal
with them!


What do I need to do?

Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<iBuyit.Payables@Enron.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3CiBuyit+2EPayables+40Enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 12:06 AM
To:	jsteffe@enron.com
Subject:	Action Requested:  Past Due Invoice

Please do not reply to this e-mail.

You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iBuyit Payables in-box
that is past due.  Please login to iBuyit Payables and resolve this invoice as soon as possible.

To launch iBuyit Payables, click on the link below:
http://iBuyitPayables.enron.com
Note:  Your iBuyit Payables User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.

First time iBuyit Payables user?  For training materials, click on the link below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.

If you are in Europe, please contact European Accounts Payable at +44 20 7783 7520.


Just spoke with Jerry.  Jerry, Barbara, the bird and the squirrel are on
their way to East Texas.


At our last meeting, we identified several impediments to participating in
the aggregation programs in Northeast Ohio.  They included the uncertainty of
the shopping credit and the requirement for load following on 500-600
megawatts of capacity in Cleveland and possibly 2000 megawatts in Norheast
Ohio, where we have no generating capacity and no pool exists.  At the
conclusion of the meeting, we decided to try and find out if there are other
serious non-Ohio affiliated bidders out there before we took more aggressive
measures on why municipal aggregation doesn't work.

I have spoken to George Pofok at Cleveland Public Power who stated that he
has spoken to 12 power marketers and 1 power broker.  He has received a
number of bids below the shopping credit from suppliers who are both
affiliates and nonaffiliates.  He said that about three or four of the
bidders have voiced concerns about getting firm transmission service into
FE.  (Once the power reaches FE, under the Ohio settlement, they will treat
it like their own native load).  An equal number of marketers have also
expressed concern about the load following issue. Pofok's view is that
without generation in the region, it will be difficult to play in this
market.  He noted that in 3-4 years, Orion will be a major player once the
buy-back is completed.  Further, he believes that the problem is not as much
one of insufficient generation as it is of insufficient transmission and that
"paper solutions" will not solve the problem.  Jeff and I will be meeting
with him to discuss transmission issues.  (Pofok is also Chairman of the
Board of Amp-Oh).

Our competitors who are proposing/building capacity in Ohio include:
Cogentrix, Dominion, DPL Energy, Dresden, Duke, Entergy, Ohio National Energy
and  PG&E National Energy Group.

With regard to aggregation in FE service territory, I see three options which
are as follows:

1.  Do not compete in that market for aggregated load
2.  Reconsider building generating capacity in the FE service territory
3.  Bid on aggregation and take the risk for balancing or sign a network
operating agreement

With respect to the third option, preliminarily, it appears that under FE's
regs, if you don't have power within a control area's control, you have to
sign a network agreement.  I am in the process of obtaining that agreement to
see if that gets us over the hurdle, since if we signed the network
agreement, we would not have to worry about load following, (depending of
course on the price).  Point to point is only available to retail customers
taking service at 69 kv and above.

The other point with regard to balancing is that under the FE settlement, as
long as the system is balanced within 88 MW, there is no penalty,  A payment
of the cost to the utility would be required if the system was out of balance
by more than 88MW (based on FE's L-sub 10 limit) and our contribution to the
system was in the same direction as the imbalance.  Cash out is at market
price  with no penalties.  Market price is calculated as the incremental cost
to FE to buy the power if we are short or the sale price if we are long.
Penalties attach if there is a pattern of frequently being out of balance.
Under the FE agreement, we would schedule a day ahead but could change that
schedule up to twenty minutes before each hour which should help manage the
risk of getting into an imbalance situation.  This is very close to how we
managed the deal we did behind Duquesne.

One other issue I am looking into is ancillary services.  It appears in the
Alliance RTO filing that the intention is to require suppliers to pay for
ancillary services associated with retail services whereas the utilities
would not.  In the FE supplier tariffs, it indicates we must pay for
transmission and ancillaries, but in the retail tariffs unbundling service,
the transmission and ancillary charges are broken out and appear to be
included in the cost the customer pays the utility (minus the shopping
credit).  I asked Rick Hornsby of Tabors and Associates to look at this to
see if there is a double counting or an argument that could be made to keep
suppliers and customers from paying the same charge twice.  He concurred that
there appears to be a double counting.  I have written up an argument on this
which is being included in a pleading we are filing today and am also talking
to staffers about it.  This would improve the economics of any aggregation
deal we might do.

As soon as I get the network agreement, I will let you know.  Please let me
know your thoughts about how we ought to proceed.

Janine


Mark Dogett Shower @ Mom & Dads


Start Date: 1/8/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Given the way the numbers came out, I guess we don't need the talking points,
but we should still try to get to the bottom of this because we will be
called on to comment to regulators and media.  Unless we have strong evidence
to the contrary, it seems to me that wholesale markets are working .... they
are open and they are competitive.  On the other hand, retail gas markets
suffer from the same problems as electric markets ... they are not open,
customers don't have effective choices and price signals don't get through,
so there is no demand response when prices rise.

On the points raised in the attachment, I'm still not sure I follow point 4.
Also what does" electric disconnect" mean?

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/12/2000 02:40 PM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

Leslie:  Looks good.  Just a couple of comments:

1. General
May want to point out that the roots of California's current gas woes are the
same ones causing the electric problem---combined effect of California's
"import-based" energy policy and the state's failure to invest in in-state
infrastructure.  California imports about 25% of its electricity, but about
80-90 percent of its gas supply.  California has failed to invest in the
in-state infrastructure necessary to support increased gas demand over the
last decade.  So we've got an interstate pipeline superhighway to the border
and a dirt road of in-state transportation once you get into California.
The last bullet seems to suggest that manipulation may be taking place.  Can
we support that suggestion, and is it one that we want to make necessarily?
If we do suggest that manipulation may in part explain current prices, do we
need to propose ways to eliminate it?  Otherwise, seems that we may be giving
FERC ammunition to take action without trying to "steer" that action in the
right direction.  Maybe I'm reading too much into the bullet.

2. Specific
Competition for gas coming to California has increased significantly.  The
midwest (via Alliance) is competing away Canadian gas.  The Southwest
(Nevada, Arizona) is competing away supply from the Southwest before it hits
the California border.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	12/12/2000 11:58 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:07 AM
---------------------------
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

We thought it would be good to basically give Chair Hoecker talking points
with any numbers that Enron provides.  We will visit on these later today
when the numbers are ready (before 3:00).  Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 12/12/2000 11:56 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Talking points about California Gas market

Here is my stab at the talking points  to be sent in to FERC along with the
gas pricing info they requested for the California markets.  Let me or
Christi know if you have any disagreements, additions, whatever.  I am
supposed to be out of here at 2:15 today, so if you have stuff to add after
that, get it to Christi.  Thanks.


[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      over  24 Games  Incredible  125% Match Deposit Bonus   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    $125  FREE from Five Roses Casino  When  you   open an account    with a $100 deposit, the Five Roses Casino will more than  double your bankroll with a 125% bonus! You  will receive an enormous $125 FREE to experience our casino  first-hand as player.  Welcome to Five Roses!  Receive Your Bonus Here     Be  our guest today  as a real player and discover  the finest virtual gaming in the privacy of your own home.   Five Roses Casino  brings  the glamour and excitement of real casino action to your desktop.  Fast payouts, generous comps, and around-the-clock friendly  customer support make Five Roses the premiere destination  for wagering online.     [IMAGE]  125%  Match Bonus!Click here    Download  casinoClick on button!   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     Click  Here to Download Free Games and Get $125!   [IMAGE]

 You  are subscribed to the RealBigWinners.com newsletter as: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com  If you wish to unsubscribe please click the link below:    Click Here to Unsubscribe

[IMAGE]


On Monday, November 27, the Arizona Superior Court issued a judgment to CV
97-03748 (consolidated) TEP vs. ACC.  The judgment  is against the Arizona
Corporation Commission on all consolidated rules and CC&N complaints filed by
the coops and pertaining to all CC&N decisions insofar as the Commission's
Electric Competition Rules and Decisions enacted and issued pursuant to those
rules are invalid for failure to provide for the Commission ascertaining the
fair value of the property of public service corporations under Article 15&
14 of the Arizona Constitution and certain rules are invalid for lack of
Attorney General certification.

It was further ordered that the coops demonstrated as a matter of law that
the Commission's rules and CC&N decisions are unlawful and unconstitutional
under the Arizona Constitution.  Commission Decisions 59942, 61071(Emergency
Rules), 61272 (Emergency Rules made permanent) and 61969 and all Electric
Competition Rules enacted under those decisions are vacated and set aside as
unlawful and unconstitutional.  All competitive CC&N's and tariffs approved
under those decisions are also vacated and set aside as unlawful and
unconstitutional.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to
Naviant. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on
the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to
unsubscribe please copy and paste the following link into your web
browser or click here:
http://mx01.opt-in-net.net/cgi-bin/optout2.cgi?email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM&eid=1-2Q-jQ-9961U
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software now available from Sega, IBM, Disney, Simon & Schuster and many others!

You have been selected to receive unlimited free software programs from the biggest publishers in the world. Click below to
receive your free software programs today!

Click here: http://www.freesoftnow.com/70006
AOL Members Click Here

All titles are full-version, CD-ROMs (not shareware or demos) that are currently sold in
retail outlets for as much as $50 each.

Act today while supplies last
So hurry up and take advantage of this (almost) too-good-to-be-true offer by clicking on the link below!

Yes, I want free software!
Click here: http://www.freesoftnow.com/70006
AOL Members Click Here

Brought to you by FreeSoft Promotions in conjunction with Sega TM, IBM TM, Simon & Schuster TM.

___________________________________________________________________
Below are just a few of the 1,000's of titles that are ALL FREE!
Visit our website to see more.

American Heritage -History of the US
Bodyworks 6.0
Chessmaster 5500
Compton's Complete - Interactive Cookbook
Deer Avenger!
Environmentally Safe Home
Food Lover's Encyclopedia
Future Cop - LAPD
House Beautiful 3D -
Interior Designer
Inside the SAT & ACT
Logic Quest
Math Invaders
Money Town
Nuclear Strike
Pink Panther
Pizza Pilots
Planetary Taxi
Reader Rabbit
Resumes That Work
Road Rash
Spellbound
SEGA Rally Championship
Simon & Schuster's New Millennium Encyclopedia
Smithsonian: Total Amazon
Think & Talk French
Tom Clancy's SSN -
Virtua Fighter
Virtua Squad
Virtual On Cybertrooper
Webster's New World Dictionary & Thesaurus
Weight Watcher's Light & Tasty Deluxe
World Book
Worldwide Soccer

Click here: http://www.freesoftnow.com/70006
AOL Members Click Here

Ref# 1-2Q-jQ-9961U
This email message may be a recurring mailing.


Do either of you have anything to add?

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/29/2001
08:38 PM ---------------------------
From: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 12:14 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: CEC Interviews

FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Corman, Shelley
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Miller, Mary Kay; Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven
Subject: CEC Interviews

McKinsey & Co. has been engaged by the State of California to evaluate
conditions in the gas market to California.  A Mckinsey representative,
together with a CEC staffer, asked to interview TW next Wednesday, Mar 28
(time TBD).  McKinsey forwarded the attached list of questions.  You'll see
that they are very general & policy oriented.  I have taken a stab at filling
in proposed answers.


Dear Fellow Sufferers,

For the benefit of all the Fellow Sufferers, I attach herewith a modified
version of the Assignment language, which was developed by Sheila and me
after our last call.  Let's discuss tomorrow!

I look forward to talking with you all then!

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - WorldHungerAssignmentOct18Rev3.doc


Dear Team,

Following is the description of the downgrade made by Moody's.

Stacey L. Wales

Stacey Wales
Origination Transaction Support
Enron Industrial Markets
713-345-7186


Tana:

You are SO fast!

Thanks for your prompt response.

Best regards,

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Haney, Mike
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark
Subject:	RE: NDA Request for Anglo American

As you requested, attached is the form of NDA for transmittal to your customer:

 << File: anglo american plc.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Haney, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	NDA Request for Anglo American

Tana:

Would you please develop an NDA for the following prospective client:

Anglo American plc
20 Carlton House Terrace
London SW1Y 5AN

Contact: Johan Serfontein
Phone: 27-11-373-6800

This will be for a potential private eMarketplace software license sale, similar to my other prospects.

Would you please e-mail me one this afternoon if at all possible?  I am going to send him an e-mail summarizing today's conversation and would like to include this as an attachment.  I'll have Johan get his lawyer to talk to you if they have questions.

Thanks,

Mike

----------------------------------------

Mike Haney
Director, eMarketplace Services
Enron Net Works
713-345-8968
mike.haney@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
10:29 AM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
03/23/2001 10:13 AM
To: Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristine Best/ENRON@enronXgate, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beatrice Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Technology for Country Folk

 - Technology for Country Folk.doc


With the change in segmentation rules on Transco, it has become much more
critical to know the primary receipt and delivery points for the capacity we
are buying.  Mr. Goodell said that Tennessee's EBB will indicate if the
points on the capacity you are buying are secondary or primary.  I would
prefer to know the actual primary points on the contract, especially the
delivery points.

I just bought some Z6-Z6 capacity from Penn Fuel for the balance of the
month.  Steve Gillespie verified that Penn Fuel released the primary receipt
and delivery point on the contract.  But, I'm taking Penn Fuel's word for it
and I am unable to verify the information myself.  It could have a big impact
on what we flow in Z6.

Colleen, can we do anything about this through the regulatory process?  Let
me know if you need specific capacity examples.


What's a dealerboard.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 01:53 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	06/01/2001 02:00 PM

		 To: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Woods
(E-mail)'" <billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'"
<bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>,
"'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Charles Linthicum
(E-mail)" <charles.linthicum@powersrc.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Ernest J. Soczka
(E-mail)" <ernest.soczka@nrgenergy.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Hap
Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'"
<jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'" <jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>,
"'John Stout (E-mail)'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall
(E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Kate Castillo (E-mail)"
<CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>,
"'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett
(E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "Mark Fillinger (E-mail)"
<mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Marty McFadden (E-mail)"
<mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Paul Desrochers (E-mail)"
<pdesrochers@thermoecotek.com>, "Paula Soos (E-mail)"
<psoos@covantaenergy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"Scott Sadler (E-mail)" <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "'Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Steve Iliff (E-mail)"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "Thomas R. McMorrow (E-mail)"
<tmcmorrow@manatt.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"William Carlson (E-mail)" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "William Hall (E-mail)"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Alan Comnes (E-mail)" <acomnes@enron.com>, "Brian
T. Cragg (E-mail)" <bcragg@gmssr.com>, "Curtis Hatton (E-mail)"
<curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, "'Dean Nistetter'" <Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>,
"George Vaughn (E-mail)" <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "'JoAnn Van Buren'"
<joann.vanburen@elpaso.com>, "John G. Larrea (E-mail)"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Mark J. Smith (E-mail)"
<mark_J_smith@fpl.com>, "Nam Nguyen (E-mail)" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"'Rachel King'" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Steve Schleimer (E-mail)"
<sschleimer@calpine.com>, "Tom Hartman (E-mail)" <tom_hartman@fpl.com>, "Ward
Scobee (E-mail)" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>
		 cc: "Thomas R. McMorrow (E-mail)" <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>, "Carol Hudson
(E-mail)" <carol@iepa.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Sandra Moseley (E-mail)"
<sandra@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>
		 Subject: RTO Filing

Greetings:

The ISO has released their RTO filing (California only) in conjunction with
SCE, and SDG&E.  PG&E has filed their own RTO plan.  We can discuss this
next week on our ISO /FERC call (has not been noticed yet).

It is posted at:
http://www.caiso.com/pubinfo/recent.html

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - RTO fliling.pdf


Thanks for the information.  We are using it to try to get a sense of the
increase in demand created by this new generation.  I have cross referenced
some of your info with some info from the power desk.  this info is
attached.  In addition, it would be helpful to get a copy of the maps you
mentioned below.  Please let me know when you can send the maps.

Thanks,

Eric

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  James Whitehead @ ENRON                           04/18/2000 11:51 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TX IPPS

Here is the information that I have compiled about new IPPs in Texas.  What
exactly are you using this for? I also have ArcView maps of the majority of
all the plant locations with surrounding pipelines. If you have any
information about new IPPs that I do not have I will be very interested.

James
3-9492


The Firm ID and Password would have been sent to Mark Haedicke.  He doesn't
recall ever receiving it.  I have to contact ISDA on Mark Haedicke's behalf
to locate the password.

	Christina Finelli@EES
	01/30/2001 01:25 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA

Tana, thanks for the help you extended Karen Cordova, Marianne Castano and me
on our recent ISDA quest.

We received a copy of a letter telling us we should contact the Primary ISDA
contact within our firm for the Firm ID and Password assigned to our
organization.  Marianne Castano asked that I get it from you or find out who
I should call.

Thanks for your help.

Christy Finelli


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001
02:36 PM ---------------------------

Darnellmo@aol.com on 04/04/2001 06:45:26 AM
To: cgiron@mindspring.com, yhaynes@mindspring.com, Darron.C.Giron@enron.com,
KRISTI.GIRON@cfisd.net
cc: paulgrobasr@hotmail.com, mcnewsome@tmw.com, barbara.mcandrews@cfisd.net,
susan.cory@phschool.com
Subject: Fwd: Texans !!!

And this is from ?my Kansas brother!!!!
Return-Path: <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
Received: from  rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (rly-yh05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.37])
by air-yh05.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:57
-0500
Received: from  mail1.kc.rr.com (fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.48]) by
rly-yh05.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:23:31 1900
Received: from pavilion ([65.28.17.153]) by mail1.kc.rr.com  with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);  Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:20:33 -0500
Message-ID: <004d01c0bc63$0276d3e0$99111c41@kc.rr.com>
From: "Clark Mayers" <jcmayers@earthlink.net>
To: <Darnellmo@aol.com>
Subject: Texans !!!
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:24:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01C0BC28.55F66A20"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300

?
Texas Baby

A Texan buys a round of drinks for all in  the bar?because, he announces
his wife has just produced "a typical  Texas baby boy weighing 25 pounds."
Congratulations shower him from all  around, and many?exclamations of
"Wow!" are heard. A woman faints due  to?sympathy pains

Two weeks later, he returns to the bar. The  bartender?says, "Say,
you're the father of the typical Texas  baby?that weighed 25 pounds at
birth. How much does he weigh now?"

The proud father answers, "Seventeen pounds."

The bartender is  puzzled, concerned. "Why? What?happened? He already
weighed 25 pounds at  birth."

The Texas father takes a slow swig from his long-neck?Lone  Star, wipes
his lips on his shirtsleeve, leans into?the bartender and  proudly
says,? "Had him circumcised."

?


I talked to Whalley about it a little bit.  The one issue is that when we
liquidate a bad position they get out first.  Think about it.


It would appear that the plague of OOM requests that have distorted prices
in New York may soon be reduced to the point that a true market may evolve
and introduce some interest in serving load without the unhedgable risk of
"uplift charges".

The difficulty in looking ahead is to determine what the real prices will be
without the numerous OOM requests that have been made in the past. The
information that has been published in the past with regard to generation
OOM did not quantify how much generation was removed from the bid stack at
any one time. Certainly a significant number of  peak hours were affected
but it is unknown to what degree. At a guess a number of hours probably had
over 1000 MW of generation OOM, effectively removing this generation from
the bid stack but showing up as "uplift charges" on that portion of the
electricity bill.

Two pieces of information would be extremely helpful in taking a stab at
what the energy prices should have been/are without the large OOM shadow
bilateral market that presently exists.

1. How much generation in aggregate was loaded OOM for each hour in each
zone?
2. Approximately how much was the uplift assigned to each zone on a daily
basis?

On a side note it is interesting to note that there is a recent presentation
to the AMP/ICM Task Force by one of the participants that has determined
that if all the large suppliers collude in tandem to withhold 50 MW each
that there could conceivably be an increase in price. While this conspiracy
theory is of concern to said presenter it would seem highly unlikely,
especially considering that bid load or exports provide a much higher impact
on price in reality than the unlikely scenario of some large suppliers all
colluding in tandem.
What should be of concern does not seem to be on their radar screen. Why are
there so many OOM requests in NYC alone? Despite the more complex system in
NYC the number of requests is significant. The resultant distortion in price
has the result of making a market that is very difficult to predict and very
difficult to hedge. The uplift charges assigned to those trying to serve
load can be devastating, well that is those without the ability to pass it
through.
An interesting market development has resulted from the numerous OOM
requests. The numerous OOM requests have translated into unhedgeable uplift
that deters retail competition. The result of a lack of retail competition
would be that customers would continue to reside with the incumbent provider
instead of with another retail provider. While this may not be the intent of
OOM requests it is realistically the result and one that should be garnering
the attention of regulators to a higher degree than other theoretical
scenarios.

The continued practice to over regulate this market will deter generator
development. I have heard some arguments that the CAP market in NYC will
ensure investment and construction of new generation. To be clear the
argument pointed to the current cap of ~$112/kw/year and that this would
ensure that generation would be developed. ICAP payments are not a
guaranteed revenue stream to any generator, especially payments of
$9.40/kw/month. New generation will result in more competition for the
payments which will result in lower capacity prices, especially in the
longer term. There is only a fixed amount of load and reductions in ICAP
prices do not result in an increase in demand for ICAP, prices will come
down; a review of the recent ICAP auctions proves that this true. The larger
the assumption for ICAP payments in a new generator development proforma,
the increased risk that is assumed going forward, especially in light of the
high regulatory risk in this market. A 25% decline in ICAP payments would be
devastating to a proforma that relied heavily on ICAP as a revenue stream.
Certainly the recent auction clearing prices suggest that the volatility is
greater than 25% and therefore concludes that an assumption for high ICAP
revenues are not a substitute for a viable and competitive energy market.
Certainly looking at the current forward prices, the surplus of ICAP and the
mitigated volatility it will not be long before generators with low capacity
factors and high maintenance costs will be closely examining the economics
of continuing to participate in the market.

In conclusion the modeling of the 138 KV in NYC promises to reduce OOM
requests by 70%, hopefully this will be the result. Certainly a significant
increase in information for OOM requests should be posted that should
include what load pocket, how much generation is loaded OOM and any other
information that is pertinent including a mechanism to request an audit of
those OOM requests to determine their validity. If all the requests are
always valid then there should not be a problem subjecting requests to an
audit. OOM requests are a deviation from the market based software dispatch,
these exceptions to the normal dispatch should be examined as closely as
generators are scrutinized when they deviate from their scheduled
dispatches.

Joe

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Hi Lynn,

Happy New Year!

I haven't seen the executed agreement come back.  Has it been signed yet?

Thanks,

Kay


Attached is a contact list for the PR Department and IR Department through the Thanksgiving weekend.


The report named: Enron Americas Position Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=102&report_name=Enron+Americas+Position+Report&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/24/2001>, published as of 10/24/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Just wanted to see how you are.
Hanging out in NY chasing Jewish babes? (A questionable hobby at best.)

Jay

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient. Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


I'm fine " check with Haedicke
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


We don't have revised versions yet.  when we do, we will probably only want
to put some (not all) of the documents on the intranet.

Gavin Dillingham@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/24/2000 02:06 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

Have we received the newly revised principles, facts and statements for the
Luntz Focus Groups? I was hoping to place these on the California power issue
database.

Thanks,

Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/24/2000 02:05 PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
08/21/2000 12:41 PM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
To: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:41 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:11:34 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (1 of 4)

Hi Steven,

 Attached is the first of four documents that we have prepared for
the focus groups.  All of the exercises are works in progress and I am
sending them to you for comments. (Hopefully, we are on the right track.)
As we discussed, I am happy to fly down to Houston tomorrow so that we can
review these materials together.  If, however, you feel that we can edit the
exercises via email that's fine too. Just let me know which arrangement
makes you the most sense to you. Hope all is well.

Regards,

Liz

 <<anti regulation speech.doc>> An anti-dereg speech is in the works.

 - anti regulation speech.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:15:16 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (2 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of facts regarding deregulation.

 <<Facts 2.doc>>

 - Facts 2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:43 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:18:16 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (3 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of principles.  We would like your suggestions
for 3 or 4 more.

 <<Principles 2.doc>>

 - Principles 2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
08/21/2000 11:44 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
11:43 AM ---------------------------

"Elizabeth A. VanDersarl" <liz@luntz.com> on 08/21/2000 09:19:26 AM
To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Luntz Focus Groups (4 of 4)

Attached please find a sheet of pro and con statements.

 <<Statements.doc>>

 - Statements.doc


This is not fun. Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Fishkin, Charles A [mailto:cfishkin@kpmg.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Buy, Rick
Subject: note

hi Rick.

Read sunday New York Times story on enron.  I believe I can relate to some
of things you must be going through.  Let me know if there is anything I can
do to help.  Fishkin chip still good.

I belive my recent article, previously sent, may be applicable, and
therefore I attach it

charles <<Everyman.pdf>> .

*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020108-ENWE.XLS


I do not see any difference in this wording.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 09:47 AM -----

	"Webb, Beth" <WebbB@dsmo.com>
	03/06/2001 11:19 AM

		 To: "'dperlin@enron.com'" <dperlin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/NEGM GISB

Dear Debra:

As promised, here is a redraft of the language on the force majeure point:

"Enron recognizes that, when NEGM is acting as Buyer hereunder, NEGM is
purchasing gas on behalf of certain gas companies (the "Repurchasers") to
whom it immediately resells such gas at the Delivery Point(s).  In addition
to any other circumstances for which NEGM is entitled to claim force majeure
pursuant to this Contarct, Enron agrees that NEGM as Buyer shall be entitled
to claim force majeure if a Repurchaser purchasing gas from NEGM is unable
to take delivery or transport gas from the Delivery Point(s) as a result of
an event of force majeure.  The parties further agree that the term
"Transporter" when used in this Contract, including, but not limited to, in
Sections 4.1. and 11.1, shall include any company acting in the capacity of
a transporter for any Repurchaser and agree that Section 4.3 of the Contract
will apply to invoices from such Transporters for Imbalance Charges received
from such Transporters to the same extent as if such invoices were received
by NEGM, provided that any such Repurchaser scheduled and nominated the same
volumes as Enron and NEGM scheduled and nominated on behalf of such
Repurchaser at the Delivery Point(s)."

Hopefully this reflects our discussions of yesterday and today.  Best
regards, Beth

============================================================================Th
is e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may
contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for
delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you
have received this communication in error, and any review, use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this
e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original
message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@dsmo.com

Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
http://www.legalinnovators.com


Ignore Shankman - I think that was a bit of joke.


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		3
Task Due On:		5/22/1999
Task Start Date:	5/18/1999

ADD EPE FAX TO BID SHEET AND MAKE IT WORK EASY


I approve the computer request for genia fitzgerald
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 02:42 PM -----

	Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/10/2001 02:36 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Ms. Sager,

I placed the order for Genia FitzGerald's printer yesterday and I received an
e-mail from the purchasing department stating that since you approve the
expenditures that you will need to forward an e-mail to Enron IT Purchasing
(or enronitpurchasing@enron.com) denoting the approval.

Attached below is a copy of their e-mail for your information that might
assist you.

Thanks,
Martha Keesler
ext. 52423


4/30/02  8:25 AM - Janelle said they would send the money today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Hamic, Priscilla; Polsky, Phil
Cc:	Barbe, Robin; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: CMS payment for March 2002 production

Ed, this is what we discussed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 1:29 PM
To:	Hamic, Priscilla; Polsky, Phil
Cc:	Barbe, Robin
Subject:	CMS payment for March 2002 production

I just spoke with Janelle Shaunghnessy (517-768-2076) at CMS Marketing regarding our March 2002 production invoice to them.  The invoice is for the 50,000 dth per day of Michcon Storage gas that we were selling CMS.  The total amount is $3,695,975.00.

According to Janelle she has not received the invoice yet so I just faxed it to her at 517-768-2110.  She said that they should be able to make the payment tomorrow.

1:28 PM, I just confirmed that Janelle received the faxed invoice.


Please review the home addresss and phone number shown on this eMail.  DO NOT RESPOND if the information is correct.  However, if incorrect then reply to this eMail with the correct information so you HR records can be updated accordingly.  Your home information is important in case the Company needs to forward critical materials to you or contact you regarding important Company information.

Address Line 1: 8002 BROMLEY DRIVE
Address Line 2:
Address Line 3:
City: HOUSTON
State: TX
Country: US
Zip: 77055
Phone: 7137228057


FYI.  We are staying at the Marriott Sawgrass, or something like that.

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001 01:50
PM ---------------------------
CHRISTY CHAPMAN @
ECT
02/26/2001 01:46 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: 27FEB HOUSTON TO JACKSONVILLE -- KAY MANN - TICKETED

Here you go.  You will have car service picking you up and take you to hotel.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
01:45 PM ---------------------------

sandra delgado <sdelgado_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 02/26/2001 01:43:49 PM
To: CHRISTY.CHAPMAN@ENRON.COM
cc: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
Subject: 27FEB HOUSTON TO JACKSONVILLE -- KAY MANN - TICKETED

                                                   SALES AGT: JH/X6XAEG

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  CHRISTY CHAPMAN X33365

  DATE:  FEB 26 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27FEB HOUSTON TX     JACKSONVILL FL 345P    648P
CO 1266    A          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO INTL
                            TERMINAL C
                            DINNER                        NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:03 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02MAR JACKSONVILL FL HOUSTON TX     1212P   138P
CO 1265    A          FRI   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL C
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:26 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

      AIR FARE 1553.48      TAX 125.02          TOTAL USD
1678.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD
1678.50

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/NKZPFP

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: NKZPFP
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Thanks. We have been watching Navigator and saw these too. I am talking with
John Hodge also and may be back with you.


i'm sorry that i did not call you on friday with my credit card number to
secure this charter.  i will call in the morning.


Hi Vince

It is my great pleasure to invite you to speak at POWER 2000 which will be
in Houston on 9 & 10 May 2000.

Would you be interested in chairing one of the streams on day 2 of the
conference? Or making a full presentation on one of the days? Please let me
know which talks interest you. Obviously, some of the talks are no longer
available but I would like to give you a choice as much as possible. Please
could you get back to me asap on 212 925 1864 Ext 151 or by return email.

I very much hope you can make the dates as I'm very keen to have you
participate at POWER. Not to flatter you unnecessarily, but I know that a
lot of people come to our conferences to hear what you have to say.

Best regards

Emma

 - Invite.doc


With the updated mutual fund NAV, the Partnership's Bank of  America LOC is actually $112k available as of the close May 25, which was  more than the estimated $25k-$50k.

- Beau

----- Original Message -----
From: Beau Herrold
To: Lay, Ken
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: Update - May 25, 2001
On Thursday, May 25 you were repaid $2,535,786.72  from the refinance of David's home ($1mm) and my home ($1,535,786).   We forwarded the funds to paydown your personal Bank of Amercia (BA) LOC.   The Family Partnership had to borrow from your personal line at BA $200,000 to  cover the $588k cash call for SRE properties.  With today's closing prices,  the Family Partnership's available BA line is between $25k-$50, which is an  estimate because mutual funds don't post their NAVs until around 5pm (Central  time).  That makes the Partnership's  total payable to KLL/LPL  personal line at $1,303,500.

I contacted the guys regarding the BBT Fund (Bass  family).  Per our conversation, I told them that the timing was bad,  but we did not want to miss out before they close the fund.  I indicated  that our initial investment would be the following: KLL/LPL personal $250,000;  KLL & LPL Investments, Ltd. $100,000; Foundation ? (possibly  $100,000).  The initial investment amount for the partnership, and  possibly the foundation, are about as low as we can go if we want to  get into the fund.  I am aware that the Foundation is waiting to as  long as possible to pay out any contributions os I wasn't sure if we wanted to  make something happen there.  Also, I indicated that we would prefer  to fund as late as possible, which looks like July  .  If we decide on doing something in the foundation they  have an Offshore Partnership to eliminate the tax implications of UBIT.   The Offshore Partnership is run exactly the same as the Onshore version, but is  unitized and pays a dividend rather than distributions to the investors.   Let me know if the amounts (above) to invest are okay with you and if you want  anything in the Foundation.


<<Option to Purchase Real Estate re TitanFehr.DOC>>

Kay:
Per your previous email,  attached is the electronic version of the
Titan-Fehr Option for your review.  Please call with any questions.  Thanks!

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - Option to Purchase Real Estate re TitanFehr.DOC


House Speaker Hastert has decided to close the entire Capitol complex,
including the office buildings on the House side, at the end of the working
day today through Monday, as a precautionary move to allow for special
agents and germ experts to conduct a sweep of the ventilation systems and
all remaining unopened mail. The Senate side is expected to do the same.

It has also been confirmed that the anthrax-laden letter sent to Senate
majority leader Daschle's office was of a particularly potent, high grade
military quality anthrax that quickly spread once opened. Some 29 staff in
Dachle's office or the mail room have tested positive, and some anthrax
spores were found in the ventilation system of the Hart building (where
Daschle's office is located) and in one of the tunnels leading to the
Capitol itself.

If there is even a hint that this military grade anthrax came from Iraq, there
will be a strike by the U.S. against Iraq.  Another possibility is that the
anthrax is of Russian origin and was somehow illicitly acquired by Al Qaeda or
the Taliban.

There has not been a second anthrax letter or a new outbreak of anthrax,
nor is there any evidence of anthrax spores spreading to committee rooms
located in the other Senate or House buildings. This was a pre-cautionary
move by House Speaker hastert, though it in no way diminishes how ugly the
situation is.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	eserver@enron.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-eserver+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	jderric@enron.com
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - Philadelphia

The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Marie Wallace
Expense Report Name: Philadelphia
Report Total: $2,197.18
Amount Due Employee: $2,197.18
Amount Approved: $2,197.18
Amount Paid: $2,197.18
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 09:40 AM -----

	RCosentino@milbank.com
	08/23/2000 02:33 AM
	Please respond to RRichards

		 To: doug.mcdowell@enron.com, craig.clark@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com,
gareth.bahlmann@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com, kevin.d.jordan@enron.com,
mark.taylor@enron.com, carol.stclair@enron.com, brent.vasconcellos@enron.com,
annmarie.tiller@enron.com, Fcochran@velaw.com, acurry@velaw.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Delta III

Attached below please find the following blacklined documents:

(1)? Enron/Delta Swap (marked against the prior draft distributed);
(2)? Enron/Citibank Swap (marked against the prior draft distributed);
(3)? Enron/Delta Guaranty (marked against the prior draft distributed);

Enron/Citibank Guaranty (marked against the prior draft distributed);
Enron/Delta Fiscal Agency Agreement (marked against Delta II);
Enron/Citibank Fiscal Agency Agreement (marked against Delta II); and
Indemnification Agreement (marked against the prior draft distributed).

Please note that the attached have not been reviewed by Citibank and
therefore remain subject to their comments as well as the continuing internal
review by Milbank, Tweed.?

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned with any questions or
comments.

??????? Eric Moser
??????? (212) 530-5388
Ray Richards
(212) 530-5575

 <<EnronDeltaSwap.doc>>  <<EnronCitibankSwap.doc>>
<<EnronDeltaGuaranty.doc>>   <<EnronCitibankGuaranty.doc>> ?
<<EnronDeltaFiscalAgencyAgmt.doc>>  <<EnronCitibankFiscalAgencyAgmt.doc>>
<<IndemnificationAgmt.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - EnronDeltaSwap.doc
 - EnronCitibankSwap.doc
 - EnronDeltaGuaranty.doc
 - EnronCitibankGuaranty.doc
 - EnronDeltaFiscalAgencyAgmt.doc
 - EnronCitibankFiscalAgencyAgmt.doc
 - IndemnificationAgmt.doc


As I promised this morning at the executive committee meeting, below are some
talking points for your use.

Overall message:  the market is working, regulation is not.

In California, peak demand rose by 10% over the last 4 years while new
capacity grew by only 2%.  But, as you would expect, the market responded by
proposing 8,000MW of new generation - - more than enough to offset the peak
demand growth.  The regulatory process, at both the state and local level,
has failed to site this new generation.  The problem is regulation, not
deregulation.

When San Diego customers began experiencing the effects of higher prices,
Enron responded with a fixed price which would have shielded San Diego
customers from price volatility and provided prices below their current
summer levels (Enron's price was about $55/MWH).  After publication of
Enron's offer, nine other companies made offers.  Again, the market responded
where regulation failed.  San Diego has not accepted any of these offers
because of regulatory/legislative restrictions on its ability to buy outside
of the PX (i.e. the spot market).

In markets where siting is easier, suppliers have moved to build additional
generation.  Enron built 3 plants in response to the 1998 price spikes.
Those plants were planned, sited and built in less that 12 months - - in time
for the summer of 1999.  Where regulatory hurdles are lower, the market
responds.

The solution to current pricing and reliability issues is more competition
not reregulation.  Policy makers should:

Open the transmission grid so that power can get from where it is to where it
is needed.

Expedite interconnection of new generation.

Expedite siting of new facilities.

Give customers a choice, so that they have better access to demand side
solutions.

Also attached is a more detailed discussion of California, prepared by Jeff
Dasovich of our San Francisco office.


MARKET NOTICE
November 6, 2001
Market Surveillance Committee Nominations and Selection Process
ISO Market Participants:
The MSC Selection Committee is currently accepting nominations (including
self-nominations) for the two vacant Market Surveillance Committee (MSC)
positions. The MSC Selection Committee is comprised of Frank Wolak, Chair of
the MSC; Severin Borenstein, Director of the Energy Institute at the
University of California; and Anjali Sheffrin, the ISO's Director of Market
Analysis.  The selection committee will conduct an extensive review of each
candidate's independence and qualifications and compose a short
recommendation list for the two additional member positions on the MSC. In
order to meet the goal of presenting a final recommendation list of 5
candidates to the ISO CEO by December 21, 2001, from which the ISO CEO will
select the two candidates for ratification as new members by the Governing
Board on January 24, 2002, all nominations need to be submitted to the MSC
Selection Committee by November 21, 2001.

Please review the attached documents for more information.

 <<MSC Board Memo_Oct01_v2.doc>>    <<Request for nominations_memo.doc>>

Client Relations Communications
CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>


PLEASE FORWARD YOUR SHIRT SIZE TO ME (S, M, L, XL, ETC.) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,
BUT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2000.

THANK YOU!!!!


Could you please send us your latest operating model for Pastoria and LV
Cogen? We are in the process of updating a spreadsheet to value the
development projects. For now, we are concerned primarily with Net Income,
Aftertax Cashflow, Capitalization, Capex and Debt Assumptions.

Also, since Winston is leaving for B-school soon, who should Ben and Jinsung
contact for future modeling questionsconcerning Pastoria?

Thanks.


Thank you to everyone who participated in the Portland employee volunteer interest survey - we appreciate your feedback.

While monetary and in-kind gifts are important, hands-on volunteers are the lifeblood of any community agency. At Enron, we recognize that we are all stakeholders when it comes to the success of our communities. Over the years, Enron employee volunteers have provided helping hands, intellectual capital and skilled labor to non-profit agencies. We hope that by identifying some volunteer opportunities that interest Portland employees we will not only have the experience of contributing to the Portland community, but also build stronger teams within our own organization. We also believe that everyone will have some fun!

For those who have not yet had time to answer the survey, we did extend the deadline for one more week. Please take a few minutes and let us know what you think about volunteer opportunities by clicking on the link below. If you have questions about the survey, please send an e-mail to community-relations@enron.com.

Thank you,

Chris Calger and Tim Belden

http://etcsurvey.corp.enron.com/wi/p0625475/i.asp?r=37&s=DXOKGTRY&l=9


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 03:49 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	10/25/2000 03:30 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 10/25/00

The EOL approvals for 10/25/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Beck/HOU/EES on 05/12/2000 09:09 AM
---------------------------

nicholas.swingler@uk.arthurandersen.com on 05/12/2000 08:39:48 AM
To: sbeck@enron.com
cc: simon.b.prew@uk.arthurandersen.com, john.e.sorrells@us.arthurandersen.com
Subject: Enron Europe - BRM 2000

Sally

Fernley has requested that we forward to you a copy of the Enron Europe BRM
2000
plan.

Please let me know should you have any further queries or comments.

Regards

Nic

(Embedded image moved to file: pic30127.pcx)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - pic30127.pcx


I lost the email with the information regarding where to send donations in
Gabrielle's honor.  Can you resend it to me?  Thanks.


thank you, cindy.


Attached is the Enron Americas Gas Trading violation memo for  Maturity Gap
Risk for May 25, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman for Enron Americas is
responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo, signing it and
returning the hard copy to Chris Abel at 3155a, who will forward it to RAC to
obtain their signature.

Thank You


I have redlined our proposed changes to the Assignment Form.  Please call
with any comments. (713)369-9290

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:34 AM
To: ronald_brown@kindermorgan.com
Cc: Mark.Whitt@enron.com
Subject: Assignment Form

Attached for your review is a form of assignment for the Trailblazer
Precedent Agreement between ENA and Trailblazer.  This assigns the PA from
ENA to J.M. Huber Corporation.

(See attached file: Huber Trailblazer Assignment.doc)

 - Huber Trailblazer Assignment.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 01:39
PM ---------------------------

"Transaction Coordinator" <transcrd@mapp.org>@mapp.org on 01/30/2001 01:26:13
PM
Sent by: owner-rtc@mapp.org
To: <rin@mapp.org>, <pemc@mapp.org>, <rtc@mapp.org>
cc:
Subject: Miles City DC Tie Policy - Updated 01/30/2001

Dear MAPP Schedule F Transmission Customers,

The Miles City DC Tie Policy has changed as of January 30, 2001.

Effective 12:00 Noon, 01/31/2001

The Policy for submitting requests for transmission service to the
WAUW.MPCO, WAUW.WACM service points under MAPP Schedule F:

Until further notice, the following policy affects requests for transmission
service to the subject service points submitted between 12:00:00 noon and
12:05:00 p.m. Central Time shall be observed.

If more than five (5) requests are submitted by the same Transmission
Customer or group of Affiliated Transmission Customers within the specified
time period to either one of the service points then all such requests shall
be considered as invalid.

MAPP will set the status of all such invalid transmission requests to
INVALID.   (For example, Six requests to WAUW.MPCO submitted between Noon
and 12:05 p.m. by the same Transmission Customer or group of Affiliated
Transmission Customers would have ALL (6) set to INVALID.

In addition the policy is posted under the MAPP Schedule F OASIS page, and
then click on OASIS Business Practices.

The URL below will also take you there:
http://mapp.oasis.mapp.org/documents/MAPP/noondctieupdate_013001.html

Please contact the MAPP Transaction Coordinator if you have any further
questions.

Sincerely,

MAPP Transaction Coordinator
(651) 632-8508