RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


I'll believe it when I see it.  Seems like a good idea to keep the heat on
Hoecker & Co.right up until Nov. 1.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 05:07 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	03/21/2001 04:11 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-99) NYMEX ACCESS(r) Web Site Update

Notice No. 01-99
March 21, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX ACCESS(r) Web Site

As of Wednesday, March 21, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESS(r) web site remains
unavailable for the ACCESS session for trade date March 22nd.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESS price
information at 1-800-438-8616.

We will provide an update regarding the status of the web site on Thursday,
March 23rd.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-99)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Imai, Rika
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Benchluch, Moises; Benjelloun, Hicham; Cline, Kevin; Gim, Steve; Gualy, Jaime; Kaniss, Jason; Mack, Iris; Makkai, Peter; Oh, Seung-Taek; Philip, Willis; Santucci, Anna; Schiavone, Paul; Soykok, Gulay; Thomas, Paul D.; Wagner, Joseph; Willis, Cory; Dickerson, Lloyd; Giron, Gustavo; Ha, Amie; Hemani, Sanjay; Jenkins IV, Daniel; Larkworthy, Carrie; Lowell, Thomas; Marquez, Mauricio; Moore, Castlen; Pan, Steve; Philippov, Maxim; Raque, Michele; Schneider, Bryce; Williams, Ryan; Young, Julie
Subject:	FW: [Fwd: Fw: Wash. Post article on power transmission]

FYI

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Steiman" <ssteiman@mpr.com>
To: "ALL HANDS" <allhands@mpra.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: Wash. Post article on power transmission

> Interesting article about power transmission problems.
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42384-2001Aug21.html
>


FYI.  I had previously asked Paul to revise the LM contract to remove all of
the references to WestLB.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000 10:58
AM ---------------------------

"PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/24/2000 06:04:20 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: ABB facility agrement

Kay:  references to WestLB are in only a few places in the GE Contract;
namely, the recitals and sections 3.8(c)(2), 5.1, 6.1, 7.2.4, 30.7 and
30.12.  The references in the recitals, 3.8(c),7.2.4, 30.7 and 30.12 can be
handled fairly easily.  The references in 5.1 and 6.1 deal with pricing
matters and will require a little work once the pricing mechanism is worked
out with GE.  My suggestion would be to not revise the document at this time
and make these changes at the same time we make any other changes arising
from the discussions with GE.  PLease let me know what you think.  Regards,
Paul

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/24/00 12:37PM >>>

Thanks.  This is a  very drastic situation, so the draft will be
appreciated.

As I recall you were going to turn another draft of the GE facility
agreement, deleting the WestLB references.  When will this be forthcoming?

Thanks,

Kay

"PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/24/2000 08:35:34 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: ABB facility agrement

Peter Thompson is working on it.  We should have a draft Wednesday.
Regards, Paul

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 10/23/00 05:38PM >>>
Paul,

When can we expect a draft of the ABB facility agreement? It is getting
urgent.

Thanks,

Kay


NYMEX Membership Services
May 31, 2001
Notice # MS-41

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 31, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

Daniel Luedke (BOCH-3354)

Ron Benaharon (WAVE-3549)

Michael Garber (GARB-3311)

Carlo Volpe (CEE-3583)

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO LEASE ORIGINAL MEMBERSHIP

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, May 31, 2001,
the following member(s) have given notice of intention to lease their sole
membership privileges:

Marc Frankel (KAOS-3224)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department at 212-299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-41)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Thanks.  Lamentably, they don't have a plan.  In fact SoCalGas is saying, "No
problems."

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	03/15/2001 02:37 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Per today's call

My recollection is that this sheet is a bit vague on detail.

California's gas problems are twofold:

Wellhead prices are still high.  CERA is the best place to get more data on
drilling activity, etc.

Instate capacity is tigh in PG&E and SDG&E.  CEC did a study, no?  In any
event California utiilties probably have plans to eliminate the bottlenecks.

GAC


ok

	Sue Rich@ENRON
	12/14/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: E-mail / Voice Mail Retention Policy Change Notice

Could you please put me on the notification list when changes like this are
implemented?  I manage the field IT function for ETS.  My group provides
support for about 1800 field employees.  We need to be able to roll this
information out in a timely manner to those field employees.

Thanks.  If you have any questions/concerns, please feel free to call me at
402-398-7809.

Sue
---------------------- Forwarded by Sue Rich/ET&S/Enron on 12/14/2000 10:26
AM ---------------------------
From: Jean McFarland on 12/13/2000 03:33 PM
Sent by: ETS General Announcement
To: ET&S Omaha Office
cc: Bob Martinez/ENRON@enronXgate, ETS Solution Center/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: E-mail / Voice Mail Retention Policy Change Notice

E-mail / Voice Mail Retention Policy Change Notice

We have just received notice of a change to the e-mail and voice mail
retention policy.  The change will go into effect Friday, December 15, 2000.

The greatest impact will be to your "sent mail," which will be retained only
30 days as compared to the current 365 days.

As a reminder, you should not use the email system to store important
documents.
They should be saved to your network directory which is regularly backed up.

However, for 'sent' messages you want to keep longer than 30 days in the
email system, you should move the messages from the Sent Mail to a specific
folder where the messages can be kept 365 days.

The scope of the e-mail retention policy includes all forms of electronic
mail, for example, Lotus Notes Mail, Internet e-mail, Outlook e-mail, and
voice mail.

Enron supports a work environment in which information is freely exchanged
and encourages employees, contractors, and agents working on behalf of Enron
to use its computers and related electronic resources in accomplishing their
work.  Computers, systems, and networks and the work products they contain
are Enron property and subject to Enron review and control.  All Enron
employees, contractors, and agents are responsible for using the computing
resources provided to them by Enron in an appropriate manner.

The revised retention schedule follows:

Message Location    Maximum Retention
Inbox     30 Days
Message Log/Sent Mail   30 Days
Trash     Rollover from Inbox for 15 days
Bulletin Boards    30 Days
Folders/Archives    E-mails placed in Folders or Archives ) one year
Voice mail     90 days

The Corp IT Group responsible for maintaining compliance with this
e-mail/voice mail policy will automatically purge e-mail and voice mail older
than the allowed maximum retention age.  Any exception to this policy
requires approval from Mark Haedicke or Richard Sanders.

If you need assistance in creating folders and saving documents to them,
please call the Helpdesk x7454.  We will be glad to assist you.

Thank.  Jean x7173


I just checked with Jeff and Ken.  They are both out of the office that day.
Sorry it didn't work out.

	gilbert whitaker <grwhit@rice.edu>
	03/06/2001 07:14 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve -

With respect to CK Prahalad's visit to Rice. As you know we are having a
breakfast for the business community the morning of March 19 and he gives
the Neuhas Lecture on Campus at 9:45 am.  Following the lunch there is a
lunch with Mrs. Neuhas the donor of the fund and faculty.  That should be
over by 1:15.  He has a date from two to five at Enron with Yeager (Steve
or Scott).  He would like to meet with Ken or Jeff sometime that afternoon
if at all possible.

Thanks for your help.

gil


Jan & Mike,
Following article highlights some of the troubles DSL providers are having in
the US.

Covad Communications Inc. - A Cautionary Tale

Covad Communications Inc. prides itself in being a high-speed Internet
services company . On 2nd January 2001 nearly 15% of Covad's staff woke up to
a holiday season present they didn't expect, as the California-based DSL
provider announced a further round of 400 redundancies to cut costs.

Not only has Covad served notice on 400 employees in the first week of 2001,
but it had already fired another 400 employees on 27 November 2000 after
restating third-quarter results for last year which revealed a wider net loss
than originally reported.

Covad's shares lost about 95% of their value during 2000, but the firm is now
hopeful that the redundancies - primarily in direct sales and marketing -
coupled with the closing of 200 DSL central offices and consolidating space
will provide improvement. Covad shares were worth about US$65 during March
2000, but are currently valued at just US$1.65 (at the time of this writing).

On 12 December 2000, Covad Communications Inc. announced that it expected its
fourth quarter and year 2001 revenues to miss Wall Street expectations and
also expected EBITDA-basis losses for the periods. This news came only weeks
after Corvad had restated lower its already-released third quarter results
because of delinquent payments from business partners.

Forward looking into the year 2001, Covad expects to report an EBITDA-basis
loss of $450-$470 million, with revenue likely to come in at $380-$390
million. These gloomy outlook changes come just as other companies that
install high-speed Internet connections over regular telephone lines - using
DSL - have been cutting staff and warning of disappointing subscriber and
revenue growth.

Corvad are hoping that by cutting the workforce, it should slow the burn
rate, which had been running at about $70 million per month, partly as a
consequence of trying to expand its network.

Corvad is a company that grew at a time when capital was freely available,
but it has all but shut itself out now from telecom service providers and
plans to start offering self-installation DSL packages for individual
subscribers in the first quarter of 2001 (D.I.Y. DSL in a Jiffy Bag)..

Corvad is Not Alone

Other US companies caught in the same troubled waters include DSL.net Inc.
and NorthPoint Communications Group Inc., whose financial condition has led
No. 1 U.S. local phone company Verizon Communications to cancel its planned
$800 million agreement to buy NorthPoint.

Covad has also said that 14 of its Internet Service Provider partners, which
sell DSL directly to consumers, are "troubled" and four of them have filed
for bankruptcy protection. On the back of this grim news, Covad announced a
program for its DSL customers that would allow them to switch from these
troubled ISPs to others with no fee.

Corvad, NorthPoint Communications Inc. and DSL.net are not alone in these
troubled times.  Many independent providers of digital subscriber line, or
DSL, Internet service, which offer high-speed data transmission and Web
access over existing copper telephone lines, have faced increasing difficulty
tapping the capital and equity markets to fund operations as they strive for
profitability.  Efforts to achieve profitability have been hurt by consistent
disappointments about subscriber and revenue growth across the sector.


Good Afternoon,

The last of our kinks has been worked out and we are going to go ahead with all schedules in the new system as of 11/15. We will then have a good couple of weeks under our belt before the start of a new month. The last date you will see any preschedules in Lotus is 11/14/01

Please see me if you have any questions.

Cara


Here's the TurboPark consent.  Please call me if you  have any comments, as I
want to send it out tonight.

Sheila, I've spoken with Lee Johnson and John Schroeder, and they are lined
up to sign at 900 tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay

PS this is consent to send 12 to TurboPark. This gives us room if the Coral
deal doesn't happen in time.


Here is a revised PMA log.  Please disregard the earlier one.

Sorry,
Amanda
x53334


Return-Path: <abraham5@flash.net>
Received: from  rly-ye05.mx.aol.com (rly-ye05.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.202])
by air-ye02.mail.aol.com (v75_b3.15) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:06:54
-0400
Received: from  ogopogo.flash.net (ogopogo.flash.net [209.30.2.14]) by
rly-ye05.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:06:23 -0400
Received: from Default (p118.amax23.dialup.hou1.flash.net [209.30.164.118])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA27038; Fri, 15 Sep
2000 16:59:27 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <001201c01f60$2f074160$76a41ed1@Default>
From: "Bonnie & Rayford Abraham" <abraham5@flash.net>
To: "Betty Nance" <bettynance@dellnet.com>,        "Carolyn Ashley"
<cashley@poha.com>,        "Denise I. Moore" <dimoore@airmail.net>,
"Jacque' Washington Smith" <faith1@pdq.net>,
<jwashing@mail.mdanderson.org>,        "Moore,Denise I"
<denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us>,        "Thomas E Wallace"
<thomas456@juno.com>,        "Bonnie G. Abraham" <bgacg@flash.net>,
"Claudette Montgomery" <WMontg6626@aol.com>,        "Edith Kelly"
<editherica@aol.com>,        "Edith Kelly"
<edith-kelly@reliantenergy.com>,        "Grace Jackson"
<gjack3@hotmail.com>,        "Kevin and Dana Davis" <kdavis2075@aol.com>
Subject: Hello
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:59:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C01F36.43DE21A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300

Please help to spread the word to all MOP  members.
?
Rev. Jacque' has requested that we each  write down and bring our personal
prayer  requests to class on Monday.? Anonymous?requests are fine--just
write?them down and bring them to class.? If you will not be in class,
please place your requests in an envelope and give them to Rev. Jacque' on
Sunday (or another MOP member).
?
Thanks
Bonnie


Samantha,

When you get in let's take a look and see if you can get into the Master Swap
Agreement Database.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 05:50 PM -----

	Michael Neves
	06/06/2000 05:28 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request (MNES-4L2JK4)

FYI --
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Neves/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 05:19
PM ---------------------------

Information Risk Management on 06/06/2000 05:26:51 PM
To: Michael Neves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Request Closed:  Access Request (MNES-4L2JK4)

The following resource request has been closed. A summary of the request
appears below. To see your original request, please click on the Request Link
icon.

Request Number:	MNES-4L2JK4
Requested For:	Tana Jones/HOU/ECT
Request Link:

	Requested Resource(s)
	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database
	Unlisted Lotus Notes Applicti...		Completed	Added Samantha Boyd to the ECT Legal - Swap -
Users group. Please allow approx. 1 hour for the change to replicate to all
of the Address Books.


Attached is the rebuttal testimony of Enron.  A hard copy was served today.

 <<x12619.doc>>

 - x12619.doc


Mark,
Here are all the relevant Documents for Indian Mesa.  Please refer to Exhibit
B-1 (interim) and Exhibit D.

Kurt Anderson
03/21/2002 01:39 PM
To: Olivia Martinez/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 03/21/2002
01:50 PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
03/21/2002 09:08 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

I requested the actual power curves from Olivia. I need a wind speed to kw
list. I didn't need the warranty amount.

Kurt Anderson
03/21/2002 08:47 AM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Mark, the curtailment periods have been re-sent, this is the first I have
heard about your requirement regarding the contractual power curve, it is
95%.

Mark Fisher
03/21/2002 08:07 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Kurt,

I am unfamiliar with the below request. To complete the curtailment for Clear
Sky that I was looking at, I will need the contractual power curve, and a new
copy of the curtailment periods . (Due to my email problems rom earlier this
week, I lost many email messages, that one appears to have been one of them).

Mark Fisher
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron on 03/21/2002 08:18
AM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
03/21/2002 07:45 AM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Kurt,

Attached is a work request corresponding to the attached e-mail.  As you can
see, we need some additional information before we can start the work.  With
the deadline of tomorrow please do not delay in providing the extra
information.

Also, note that we may not have the curtailment information.  We need to know
the timeframe for the request before we can say either "we have it" or "we
don't have it".

Thanks,
Hollis

Kurt Anderson
03/20/2002 05:21 PM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Yes, the services of your department are requested. We need the data as soon
as possible, I would think the customer expects to see this by Friday at the
latest. This is related to a request that Mark Fisher has been working on,
perhaps he can provide additional background on this issue.

KA

Hollis Kimbrough
03/20/2002 04:49 PM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Kurt,

We haven't heard anything regarding a request for data for AEP.  Do we need
to be involved and if so, then what is the timeframe that you need the data
for?

Hollis
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/20/2002
05:00 PM ---------------------------

Klaus Obel
03/20/2002 12:47 PM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Kurt, how far have we gotten with this process?
Do we have the information requested below available?
Thanks, Klaus

---------------------- Forwarded by Klaus Obel/EWC/Enron on 03/20/2002 12:47
PM ---------------------------

wcmarshall@aep.com on 03/19/2002 07:47:14 AM
To: Klaus.Obel@enron.com
cc: rlsimon@windots.net, bmgivens@aep.com

Subject: Curtailment at Clear Sky

Rich Simon needs the following data:

10 or 15 minute average wind speed, wind direction from Met Tower 652 and if
it is still standing from the 10 meter tower 653. ?
10 or 15 minute energy production for each turbine
Which turbines were curtailed and when and how long they were curtailed

Let me know if and how long it will take to gather this data.

Ward Marshall
Director, Business Development
AEP Energy Services, Inc.
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, OH 43215-2373

Office (614)324-6957
Fax (614)324-6994
Cell (614)314-5538


Please prepare a bcc on the Siemens letter as indicated below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 02:00
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/18/2001 01:49 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Allegheny - Patty Clark's Fax for bcc on Westinghouse letter


Gina-

For the time being, keep the PR groups sweet but make no commitments.  We need to obtain market commitments as a first priority, which Kevin is pursuing most diligently.  He should have more feedback in October.

Keep us on your 'to do' list and thanks for all your help!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Gina
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Gadd, Eric; Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	PR Firm in Arizona

Hi Eric and Kevin!

I have heard from the PR group in Tuscon and they are anxious to start working with us.  They actually mentioned partnering with the Phoenix firm, just like we tossed around.

Would ya'll like to get together to discuss what direction we head?  With an expected first quarter 2002 filing, I think we need to start identifying our stakeholders and getting in touch with them.   We'll need the PR firm to get things moving for us.

Thanks a million.

Gina


Dear David and Dan:

	I want to thank you for making the effort to come to Houston last month and for your kind follow-up letters.  I enjoyed the opportunity to meet you, and I also enjoyed our discussion.  Don't forget my offer to treat you to a game at Enron Field.  All the best.  Jim


Hello EJOT,

This is just a reminder about Thursday's (06/22/00) conference call regarding
the weekly Japan update at 6:00 p.m. Houston time. Please forward your
updates to Joe Hirl and please copy me. The call will be held in Conference
room 21C2 for Houston participants.

Domestic:   1-800-991-9019
Intern'l           847-619-8039
Code:            5764488#

Also please see last week's consolidated report:

Thanks, Eddie!


FROM ROB WALLS AND JOHN ALE:

We have just discussed a few items with the commercial team and Rockne and have come to the following compromise as matters relate to "Subsidiaries":

"Subsidiary" will include all entities owned or controlled 50% or more by Gipper.  That will pick up several unconsolidated entities, either because of a high economic interest or control of the board of a general partner (e.g., Azurix, EOTT).  All matters disclosed in Gipper's SEC filings or filings by significant subs that file their own public reports (e.g., Azurix, EOTT) will be exceptions to every representation.

Section 5.7, insofar as it applies to any balance sheets, will include consolidated subsidiaries only.  (Note that the rep might expand to include financials on unconsolidated entities that file separate SEC reports).

All items in Section 5.22 are being deleted other than clause (iii), but will continue to pick up VP and above.  In other words, the contract list needs to show  deals of $500,000 or more with officers of Gipper and Subsidiaires (50% or more ownership or control) in which an officer at VP or above personally has an interest.

Also, in listing matters, please recall that materiality is defined with reference to Gipper and its subs taken as a whole.  That's a very high threshhold.

Thanks.


Please call me.  I'm not trying to derail the process.  I have been waiting
to understand the LLC intent and toward that end was advised that Kaye Mann
was the lawyer to speak with.  Kaye has not returned email or voice mail and
I have once again requested her response.  Willl you be handling credit for
this LLC?  Is it in competition with ENA?  Sara

	Molly Harris
	08/29/2000 05:16 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: MEH - ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex

Sara

As you know, Peoples has been eagerly awaiting templates (ISDA, Guarantees,
L/Cs) from Enron for the MEH JV. At this point, their credit officer is
leading the charge with People's legal department and moving forward to
create something!  I have shared that we do not want to utilize the existing
People's agreement as a standard.

Do you have templates we could give them now and explain they are under
revision?  They have wanted to begin reviewing and are now anxious.   Don't
we want Enron to lead the way for these templates?  Please advise.

Thank you
Molly

Stephanie Panus@ENRON
08/29/2000 08:58 AM
To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex

Attached are copies of the standard Schedule to Master Agreement and
Paragraph 13 to the Credit Support Annex.

Gregg - I'll send you the ISDA Master and Credit Support Annex via regular
mail.

Stephanie

Gregg Penman
08/29/2000 08:34 AM
To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex

Regular mail is probably the safest bet.  My address is 150 N. Michigan Ave,
Suite 3610, Chicago, IL  60601.  Molly Harris, Credit, and I were also
expecting e-mail copies of our standard Schedule to Master Agreement and
Paragraph 13 to the Credit Support Annex.  I am not sure of the status of
these, but any assistance you could provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your help.

Gregg

Stephanie Panus
08/28/2000 04:41 PM
To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex

Gregg -

Aug. 23 I sent via interoffice mail a copy of the ISDA Master Agreement and
Credit Support Annex.  You should have received them by now.  I will forward
another copy.  Would you rather I sent it via regular mail?


(See attached file: NG060701.pdf)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 - NG060701.pdf


We've changed the weekly scheduled meeting to accommodate more people's calendars:

When: every Tuesday
When: 3pm
Where: 15c1


I forgot to give you money for parking I am so embarrased and sorry.  I'll
give it back to you this evening.  I have a  meeting at 11am and a class from
1pm to 2pm today so if you call or email me within those time frames and I
don't respond for a while, that's why.


Any idea who this is?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/08/2001 08:18 AM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	01/08/2001 08:12 AM

		 To: "richard.b.sanders@enron.com" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Submitted: Access Request for hugh.eichelman@enron.com

You have received this email because you are listed as an alternate data
approver. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012515&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000012515
Approver            : linda.r.guinn@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/8/01 8:12:00 AM
Requested For       : hugh.eichelman@enron.com
Resource Name       : Litigation Tracking Database Write
Resource Type       : Applications


Tana:  look in lotus notes.  I think you should contact Russell for Canada
(since Rod is gone).  Cyntia Pastega is the business person.  SS

	Tana Jones
	07/14/2000 02:27 PM

		 To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc. ISDA Master

Hydro Quebec has forwarded to us their form of ISDA Schedule for the
referenced counterparty for review.  There is no indication of what Enron
business person is interested in this counterparty.  I will forward a copy of
the ISDA to Mr. "Canada" Suttle, and open a Lotus Notes entry with the
contact information.  We won't do anything until we receive a credit
worksheet from Credit.


Ted,

My day is going quite well, actually.  I managed to sleep in past 6:30 a.m.
this morning and did not work-out so I'm feeling pretty good.  I'm not sure
if I'll be able to respect you in the light of your "rule-breaking", but I'm
going to try to look past that.  I'm heading to lunch right now - yes, I am
actually leaving the building - so the day just keeps getting better and
better.  As for last night, I had a really good time too and am glad you were
able to look past my bad manners and agree to go out Friday.  Talk to you
soon.

Susan

-- By the way, I'm very relieved to hear about the buckle.

Ted Noble
07/20/2000 11:19 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Shorty,

I hope your day is going well and your trader and thus you are having a good
day.  I just realized that I broke the "rules" last night.  I should say no
to a Friday night out when asked out on Wednesday night but I'll let it go
this time because we are going country and you are breaking out the t-shirt
and jeans.  When I think about it, that exception applies to every
situation.  I had fun last night and I think you will be relieved to know
that I can't get my huge belt buckle on order and shipped in time for
tomorrow so you are in the clear.

Ted


Eric Linder has accepted a position with the West Real Time  group effective
March 12th.  Eric previously worked as a  financial advisor at Paine Webber.
Please join me in welcoming Eric to the West Desk.

B. Williams


Dude I hear you are going to be in town this weekend.  Unfortunately I will
be gone, I am going to SF to hang with Burnsy as i have a six day break from
work.  I will however, be back in town on Sunday night.  If you are going to
be in town  still maybe we could grab a beer late sunday night (I don't get
in until 10) or grab lunch on Monday as I don't work monday.  Give me a call
on my cell and let me know.  Oh, by the way i will be going out with the one
and only Marc Johnson for some beers in the city on Friday night.  He is in
the country for a month.  If you want to have a chat with the man give us a
call that night 503-702-0463.  Take care buddy and happy holidays!  Oh yeah,
what is your address. I am sending out some x-mas cards.


You got that right!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zeman, Angie
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Back to Houston

Even if we get bought out, the trading arm will still be going strong.  Gas and Power are the only things that ever made us money.  And you better still be there if I'm coming all the way back to see you!!

Angie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:13 PM
To:	Zeman, Angie
Subject:	RE: Back to Houston

If we are still here that is.  ENE is at $7.36 - mood isn't so good.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zeman, Angie
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:07 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Back to Houston

Hey- I'll be working directly for Savita Puthigai.  :)  Should be good and I can't wait to be back home!  (Then we'll go for Chick-fil-a and catch up.)

Angie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:04 PM
To:	Zeman, Angie
Subject:	RE: Back to Houston

Hey girl.  Who are you working for?  You know all my favorite women (except for Judy) work for EnronOnline.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zeman, Angie
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Southard, Carrie; Lamadrid, Victor; Germany, Chris; Elliott, Lexi; Diza, Alain; Crook, Jody
Subject:	Back to Houston

Hi All-

Just thought I'd let you know that I've accepted a new position within EnronOnline and I'll be moving back to Houston in early December.  Should be fun!  I'm looking forward to seeing you all soon and getting back into the swing of things.

Hope all is well-
Angie


Jeff,

Our friends at the University of Texas are planning a conference on energy
economics and finance in February of next year. They would like very much to
have
you as a keynote speaker.

Given our good, long-term  relationship with UT,  I would recommend
that you speak at this conference. I talked to Prof. Ehud Ronn
a few times about the program and  I think that this will be
an excellent forum to present Enron's accomplishments and
agenda for the future.

I am sure that Rick Causey will join me in making the same recommendation.

Vince


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
02:31 PM ---------------------------

"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 03/28/2000 09:47:58 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <vkamins@enron.com>
Subject:

Good morning Vince,

Sorry to have missed you at your office this morning.  Attached are today's
issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. Fixed Income Today - US treasuries, agencies, and corporates' analyses,
2. Financial Markets Today - FX majors and key bond markets' analyses.

How useful do you find our research?  Also, do you mind if contact your
colleagues directly to get their feedback?  That will save you time  from
forwarding this info to them daily.  Please let me know whom I may contact.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. + 1 212 571 4332
fax  + 1 212 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FIT0328a.pdf
 - FMT0328A.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: Christina R-C [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:15 AM
To: upwindmark@aol.com; corinasanders@hotmail.com;
gholcomb@prismretailservices.com; kwsargent1970@yahoo.com;
laffsusq@aol.com; Larry@betterthanair.com; larrygraziani@starband.net;
Whitt, Mark; www.floraldivide@qwest.net
Cc: plucci@enron.com
Subject: Fwd: Sample

>From: Ron Forester <rrfore2@qwest.com>
>To: Jason Hellander <jhellan@qwest.com>, Aaron Sanchez
><aasanch@uswest.com>,   Barbara Kennedy <barbara_kennedy@hotmail.com>,
>bob baker <bob.baker@igt.com>,   Christina Rawlings-Curtis
><christina_122367@hotmail.com>,   Danielle Wade
><daniellekwade@hotmail.com>,   Gil Hernandez <Gil.Hernandez@twtelecom.com>,
>   joe hofmeister <joe.hofmeister@twtelecom.com>,   joe kennedy
><joe.kennedy@informix.com>, kenneth brunel <kenb@informix.com>,   Keith
>Brunel <gutha@worldnet.att.net>, Kurt Ramsbacher <kramsba@uswest.com>,
>NICOLE FORESTER HERNANDEZ <Nicole4SBS@aol.com>
>Subject: Sample
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:07:57 -0700
>
>  	>Subject: The Sample
>  	>
>  	>
>  	>An 85-year-old man went to his doctor's office to get
>  	>
>  	>a checkup and the doctor determined a semen
>  	>
>  	>sample was required. The doctor gave the man a jar
>  	>
>  	>and said, "Take this jar home and bring back a
>  	>
>  	>semen sample tomorrow. "
>  	>
>  	>The next day the 85-year-old man reappeared at the
>  	>
>  	>doctor's office and gave him the jar, which was as
>  	>
>  	>clean and empty as on the previous day. The doctor
>  	>
>  	>asked what happened and the man explained "Well,
>  	>
>  	>doc, it's like this, first tried with my right hand,
>  	>
>  	>but nothing. Then I tried with my left hand, but still
>  	>
>  	>nothing.
>  	>
>  	>Then I asked my wife for help. She tried with her
>  	>
>  	>right hand, then her left, still nothing. She tried
>  	>
>  	>with her
>  	>
>  	>mouth, first with the teeth in, then with her teeth
>  	>
>  	>out, and still nothing. We even called up Earleen, the
>  	>
>  	>lady
>  	>
>  	>next door and she tried too, first with both hands,
>  	>
>  	>then an armpit and she even tried squeezing it between
>  	>
>  	>her knees, but still nothing."
>  	>
>  	>The doctor was shocked! "You asked your neighbor?"
>  	>
>  	>The old man replied, "Yep, but no matter what we tried
>  	>
>  	>we still couldn't get that jar open!"
>
>
>
>
>  	>Subject: The Sample
>  	>
>  	>
>  	>An 85-year-old man went to his doctor's office to get
>  	>
>  	>a checkup and the doctor determined a semen
>  	>
>  	>sample was required. The doctor gave the man a jar
>  	>
>  	>and said, "Take this jar home and bring back a
>  	>
>  	>semen sample tomorrow. "
>  	>
>  	>The next day the 85-year-old man reappeared at the
>  	>
>  	>doctor's office and gave him the jar, which was as
>  	>
>  	>clean and empty as on the previous day. The doctor
>  	>
>  	>asked what happened and the man explained "Well,
>  	>
>  	>doc, it's like this, first tried with my right hand,
>  	>
>  	>but nothing. Then I tried with my left hand, but still
>  	>
>  	>nothing.
>  	>
>  	>Then I asked my wife for help. She tried with her
>  	>
>  	>right hand, then her left, still nothing. She tried
>  	>
>  	>with her
>  	>
>  	>mouth, first with the teeth in, then with her teeth
>  	>
>  	>out, and still nothing. We even called up Earleen, the
>  	>
>  	>lady
>  	>
>  	>next door and she tried too, first with both hands,
>  	>
>  	>then an armpit and she even tried squeezing it between
>  	>
>  	>her knees, but still nothing."
>  	>
>  	>The doctor was shocked! "You asked your neighbor?"
>  	>
>  	>The old man replied, "Yep, but no matter what we tried
>  	>
>  	>we still couldn't get that jar open!"
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Subject: The Sample
> >
> >
> >An 85-year-old man went to his doctor's office to get
> >
> >a checkup and the doctor determined a semen
> >
> >sample was required. The doctor gave the man a jar
> >
> >and said, "Take this jar home and bring back a
> >
> >semen sample tomorrow. "
> >
> >The next day the 85-year-old man reappeared at the
> >
> >doctor's office and gave him the jar, which was as
> >
> >clean and empty as on the previous day. The doctor
> >
> >asked what happened and the man explained "Well,
> >
> >doc, it's like this, first tried with my right hand,
> >
> >but nothing. Then I tried with my left hand, but still
> >
> >nothing.
> >
> >Then I asked my wife for help. She tried with her
> >
> >right hand, then her left, still nothing. She tried
> >
> >with her
> >
> >mouth, first with the teeth in, then with her teeth
> >
> >out, and still nothing. We even called up Earleen, the
> >
> >lady
> >
> >next door and she tried too, first with both hands,
> >
> >then an armpit and she even tried squeezing it between
> >
> >her knees, but still nothing."
> >
> >The doctor was shocked! "You asked your neighbor?"
> >
> >The old man replied, "Yep, but no matter what we tried
> >
> >we still couldn't get that jar open!"
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Annette:

Here are Jackie's cover letter and resume.  Thanks very much for you help.
Hope it's not a bother.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/16/2000 03:15 PM -----

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/08/2000 01:10 AM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 cc:
		 Subject: my res and cover letter

Thanks for passing this along!

-Jackie

 <<001102 schwab cover letter .doc>>  <<KellyJacquelineA.-Nov02-00.doc>>

 - 001102 schwab cover letter .doc
 - KellyJacquelineA.-Nov02-00.doc


We are still experiencing problems in bringing up the hardware from last
night's emergency outage.  As of 5:30 AM you cannot access the application.
Every attempt is being made to rectify this problem.  Once the application is
available, please stay out of position manager and use CPR Positions until
you have been notified.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Scott Mills


Johnny lets set up an interview with this guy.
Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, Johnny
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; Hernandez, Juan; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Melodick, Kim; Nolly, Qiana
Subject:	George Phillips  Resume

Don/Juan/Lloyd:

George is interested in opportunities on the 24 hour desk.  Please advise of your interest.

Thanks,
Johnny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Phillips, George
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Palmer, Johnny
Subject:

Johnny,

Nice meeting you this morning.  Attached is my resume.  I appreciate any doors you may be able to open.  -George

 << File: Resume2001v2.doc >>


Your not going to bed at 5:00 tonight because you will be getting your ass
kicked in Tennis tonight.  Tennis anyone?
Ben


Per my fax (37 pages) of 8/29/99, attached are copies of (1) the existing and
proposed Annex A (general terms for the omnibus) and (2) proposed option
formats for ISDA and omnibus.  My purpose was to "ISDAize" the omnibus
particularly in the cap/floor/collar world.  Please note the Par.2 Payment
section and revised definitions.  You do not have "old" confirm templates
because I cannot acces on my computer (but all was included in the fax). Did
you receive the fax?   SS


Steve, write these down in pencil - I need a chance to review.

thanks
Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
07:09 PM ---------------------------

Dan Leff@EES
02/06/2001 04:31 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 EES Goals

Steve -

Per your request.

Regards - Dan


Everyone,

Looking for a volunteer to market TW to this new power plant so that they will take the supplies off our pipe.  Any takers?

Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lohman, TK
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: New Mexico Power Plant Project

Supplies have not been lined up as of yet.  They are waiting to get farther along on the permits.

TK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Lohman, TK
Subject:	FW: New Mexico Power Plant Project

TK, just checking to see if you have heard who may be supplying the supply for this plant?

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: New Mexico Power Plant Project

Can we contact them to find out about how they plan to get their gas supply? I know Stan will ask me about this one.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brennan, Lorna
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Chavez, Gabriel; Dowd, Stephen; Gadd, Eric; Hyatt, Kevin; Millar, John; Ratner, Michael; Taylor, Gina; Hass, Glen; Loeffler, Michael; Stanton, Lon; Wilson, Rob; Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Goradia, Pallavi; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Moore, Jan; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	New Mexico Power Plant Project

Regent Energy in Pact to Develop 500 MW Plant
Regent Energy recently executed a contract with Millennium Energy Ventures, a private Houston-based venture capital and project development company, to develop an electric plant with 500 MW generating capacity on Regent's Horseshoe Gallup lease in San Juan County, NM.
Regent will own 75% of the project, while MEVCO will own the remaining 25%. The estimated cost of the project comes in at $250 million.
Under the agreement, MEVCO will manage the permitting, estimated at 6 to 9 months, and construction process, arranging the equity as needed for same. Regent will be prepared to give up 50% (total) of its 75% net for the financing, netting a 25% interest following the equity/debt financing.
Further terms of the agreement provide that MEVCO will assist Regent in the acquisition of several gas fields in the Four Corners area, San Juan and Rio Ariba Counties of New Mexico, totaling an estimated 90+ Bcf and 20 MMcf/d current production. This production will be sufficient to power 100 MW of the power plant, with the remaining supply to be aggregated from other San Juan producers.
MEVCO Managing Director Phillip Gennarelli noted, "We are pleased to be involved in this project with Regent. The addition of more producing properties in the area that we bring Regent, coupled with Regent's Horseshoe Gallup holdings, which are in direct proximity with the existing Four Corners Power Plant and the route of the recently announced Sonoran Pipeline venture of Calpine and Kinder Morgan, will provide an unequaled opportunity for both companies."
Regent President John Ehrman said, "The additional production from producing properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing, currently producing some $1.5 million per month in net operating income, coupled with the additional income through power generation helps Regent to maximize the location of our holdings in relation to the proximity of the existing power plant and transmission lines to key electricity markets in Los Angeles and other western markets. It is a good use of our surface lease, not related to the current proved mineral reserves of the lease."
The producing oil and properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing are in Regent's core area of the Four Corners region near Farmington, NM. Regent will be required to finance the acquisition of the oil and gas proven producing properties under consideration.
Recently, Regent announced that it was in the process of purchasing the interests of all remaining working interest owners in the field, a transaction that is expected to be consummated by the end of the third quarter 2001, giving Regent 100% ownership of the current minerals on the lease.


This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4QHLKD
Order For:               Tom Halliburton

This computer is required to run a software licence manager only.  It will be
running continously, but will not be used by any individual.  The smallest,
cheapest machine suitable connecting to the Enron network will be adequate.
Secondhand hardware will be suitable.

Enron IT Purchasing


The message that you sent was opened by the following:
	davem@cajunusa.com

Information about your message:
	Subject: Superbowl Party
	Message-Id: <31738B46B7BD864080808A19977D9F755A396E@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/12/2000 10:51 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ US Southwest Pwr Mkt Rises On Unit Outage, CalPX Chaos

17:13 GMT 12 December 2000 DJ US Southwest Pwr Mkt Rises On Unit Outage,
CalPX Chaos
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Prices for prescheduled power in the southwestern U.S.
rose Tuesday due to a unit outage and uncertainty about the market rules of
the California Power Exchange, traders said.
The 498-megawatt San Juan coal-fired unit 4 in New Mexico tripped off the
grid Monday due to a tube leak, but it is expected back on line Tuesday
night.
Traders also said total uncertainty about the market rules in California
have thrown the market into chaos. On Sunday, the California Power Exchange
cleared power sales at prices above $250/MWh because the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission approved an emergency request from the California
Independent System Operator to move to a new "soft" price cap.
The ISO asked to be able to purchase power for more than $250 a
megawatt-hour, so long as any seller agrees to provide documentation on
costs to justify the high price. In time, the FERC could reduce prices for
any sales above $250/MWh if the FERC deems the price unreasonable, according
to the "soft" cap rules originally proposed by FERC.
The CalPX says that its day-ahead market has also moved to the soft price
cap, but the ISO on Sunday constrained almost all CalPX prices for Monday
down to $250/MWh, from an average of $611.53/MWh. The ISO staff and middle
managers apparently don't believe the new soft-cap applies to the CalPX
market, though late Monday the ISO constrained some prices for Tuesday down
to $250-$500/MWh but left the CalPX clearing prices for nine hours unchanged
at $926.34-$1,020.99/MWh.
Traders said Tuesday that no ISO constrained pricing formula comes up with
even figures as $280/MWh and $500/MWh, and that somebody at the ISO is just
making up prices arbitrarily.
With all the uncertainty about what final prices will be, suppliers avoided
the CalPX market Monday and Tuesday. With fewer sell offers and steady
demand, the CalPX has risen sharply higher than the bilateral market. The
much-higher CalPX clearing prices Monday, in turn, pushed the southwest
bilateral market higher early Tuesday, traders said

               On-Peak/MWh          1 Day Previous
Palo Verde    $  400.00-$  520.00  $  300.00-$  375.00
Mid-Columbia     650.00-   850.00     750.00- 1,000.00
COB              600.00-   800.00     700.00-   900.00

After the bilateral market completed most of its trading, the CalPX posted
Wednesday on-peak clearing prices that averaged $1,406.76/MWh, up $417. How
the ISO may change those prices later Tuesday is unknown. The CalPX made an
emergency filing late Monday with the FERC to include its market in the new
"soft" cap rules.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 12-12-00
1713GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Another one to brighten your day!  SRS
 - President's Sail.JPG


Jessica,

I'm sorry I never got in touch with you last weekend, but I had the wrong
phone number with me and didn't have enough brain power to think of using
Information.  I don't think I would have been much fun anyway since I pretty
much just ended up sleeping the whole weekend.  In fact, I fell asleep in the
car on the ride back to my sister's house after the game and my parents
decided to just leave me in the car.  I think I was probably out there for an
hour before I woke up (needless to say I was very confused).  Anyway, hope
things are going well for you and Clay.  I know everything must be kind of
crazy for both of you right now with finals coming up and all of the
interviewing you've both no doubt been doing.

I really want to get a chance to see you and chat...I don't feel like we've
had a good one in forever.  I will be in Austin over Thanksgiving for the
game, so we could try to touch base then if you're going to be in town.  If
not, I'm sure I can manage at least one weekend trip during December if
there's a good weekend for you.  Just drop me  a line when you get a chance
and let me know what's new with you.

Susan

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  JesPulliam@aol.com                           10/25/2000 03:55 PM

To: <sscott5@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: hello!!

Susie-just wanted to say hello and see how your trip went!!  Hope you had a
ball.  Also, I wanted to let you know that Clay and I are having family and
friends over for food and beer after the game this weekend and would love to
see you.  We are at 1810 Palma Plaza--if you take Enfield towards Mopac, take
a left at the light at Hartford, take a right on Palma Plaza, we are the last
(blue) duplex on the right before Mopac; our half faces Palma Plaza and the
other half faces Mopac.  If you forget these directions--my number is
512-322-0692.

Jessica


All,

The numbers for the brokers in the file sent before were correct, however the totals at the bottom were incorrect.  I apologize for the error.

				Greg x35399


Let's shoot for early next week for lunch.  Talk to you soon.
Ben


I think you're dead on.

	Karen Denne
	05/31/2001 08:01 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: California Lawmakers Eye Billing Businesses for Edison Rescue
By Jason Leopold

I didn't talk to Jason on this one.  I'll check w/ Mark, but I doubt he would
know what we gave to Hertzberg and the chamber.  It's odd that Jason said
Enron "executive" since if he talks to me or Mark, he uses "spokesman" or
uses our names... I think Davis's new hit men are really trying to paint us
as the evil empire...


Attached is an Excel spreadsheet as before with an additional sheet totaling both the tie in and measurement.


Carrie,

I am sending you, as promised, the draft of my proposal. Please, let me know
if it meets your requirements. I shall be glad to revise it and send you the
final version.

Vince Kaminski

******************************************************************************

**********

One of the most important trends in the energy industry during the last year
was proliferation of electronic, Internet based, trading platforms for
wholesale markets and for retail operations. Websites such as
www.houstonstreet.com and www.altranet.com provide facilities for matching
buyers and sellers. The website operated by Enron Corp. (EnronOnline)
represents an alternative solution under which Enron acts as a principal in
every transaction. On the retail? side, many retail e-commerce companies
offering auctions, reverse auctions and platforms for creation of buyers,
clubs challenge incumbent utilities. The objective of this project is to
evaluate the impact of e-commerce (both at the wholesale and retail levels)
on the energy industry. The study will start with comparative analysis of
different wholesale trading and retail e-commerce business models and
evaluation of their long-term viability. The next step will be assessment of
the impact of e-commerce on price dynamics, profit margins and the level of
competition in different energy markets. A separate section will be devoted
to analysis of reaction of companies and organizations affected by e-commerce
(incumbent utilities, organized exchanges, energy brokers) to the new
competitive threat, and different strategies they implement to meet the
challenge. Organized exchanges have accelerated in many cases the transition
to screen-based trading that has been already replacing open outcry
technology. Power and natural gas marketers have created alliances (with
other industry players, software companies and electronic exchanges) to
create their own trading platforms. Gas and electric utilities embarked on
development of vertical and horizontal e-commerce platforms, offering
services to households and other companies in the energy industry. The
critical question is how quickly different companies should react to the
competitive threats and how fast they should exploit opportunities created by
the Internet based economy. It's quite obvious that the Internet revolution
will change the energy industry's landscape during the next few years. The
objective of the project is to provide answers to the questions posed above,
based on the currently available information. Additionally, the participants
should come up with fallback strategies the energy companies should implement
in case the currently? expected trends fail to materialize.

_


Jeff,

Mark Elliot in Legal here in London is concerned that there may be tax or
legal implications depending on how involved in the process London gets.  It
would be helpful to Mark if you could let him know what the problems you are
experiencing with your clearing function are and what exactly London will be
doing, this way Mark and tax can investigate.

Monday is a bank holiday in London so Mark and myself will be out of the
office.

Regards,
Maria.

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Nartey/LON/ECT on 30/04/99 17:46
---------------------------

Mark Elliott
30/04/99 15:24
To: Maria Nartey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Maria,

Not necessarily - it is just that the OMLX got hold of the idea (I am not
sure wherefrom) that Enron wanted Merrills - I have previously asked Mark
Taylor, the VP in Legal in Houston,  whether or not Merrills would meet with
the commercial peoples' approval and I know that Mark has been trying to find
this out, but I have not received word on this as yet.

May be you can endeavour to find this out??  As I say, I have already
forwarded to Mark Taylor in Houston the signature versions of the Clearing
Agreements in the name of Merrills - so if we want to change, no problem, it
will just take a few days for us to get new docs raised from the OMLX and
then to pass them on to Houston.

Kind regards

Mark

Maria Nartey
04/30/99 02:22 PM
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Mark,

Does this mean that you would prefer it to be Merrill Lynch?  If so I can
pass this on to Jeff Harbert and see if he and Bob Crane are OK with this.

 I'm not sure what the clearing problems they are having in Houston are but
it might mean that you will have more legal points to finalise.  I tried to
contact Jeff to get some more information for you but he is out of the office
until Monday.

I can try him again on Tuesday but if you have any legal question or queries
you might want to speak to him yourself, his no is 001 713 8536979.   Either
way please keep me updated.

Regards,
Maria.

Mark Elliott
30/04/99 12:19
To: Maria Nartey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Maria,

The Clearing docs we got in from the Exchange showed Merrill Lynch in London
as Houston's clearer.  This is not to say this is fixed, but for some reason
the OMLX were under the impression that it would be Merrills.  By the way, we
can have as many clearers as we like (provided, of course, that they are
General Clearing Members at the OMLX).

If you could let me now quite swiftly on this issue I would be very grateful
as we finalised the legal points on Clearing docs a couple of weeks ago and I
have already couriered the final  versions for signature to Houston.

Kind regards

Mark

Maria Nartey
04/30/99 09:00 AM
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Nartey/LON/ECT on 30/04/99 09:03
---------------------------

Maria Nartey
29/04/99 19:22
To: Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Barry Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Jeff,

We only use two London clearing houses, Bank Paribas and Carr.  The back
office at Carr was not very good when I used to deal with them but I've been
told that they are much better now.  Paribas was definitely the better of the
two from a back office point of view.

Let me know if you need anything else.
Regards,
Maria.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jeff Harbert                           29/04/99 18:45

To: Barry Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Maria Nartey/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Hi Barry,

Regarding our upcoming Pulpex "market maker" role, we're running into a few
problems with the clearing function.  I mentioned to Bob that it may make
more sense to use one of the existing London office clearing houses.  Under
an arrangement like that I would see the following:

a.  London uses an existing "clearing house" for the Pulpex margining
activity.  A new account would be required to separate paper from your other
business.
b.  London admin. maintains the account from a support standpoint on behalf
of ECT Houston Pulp & Paper including 1) daily margining requirements, 2)
cash account reconcilation, and 3) other accounting requirements.
c.  Houston office would be responsible for the electronic trading, reporting
positions, reconcile trading activity, report Profit/(Loss), etc.

ECT Pulp & Paper would reimburse London office for expenses incurred in
connection with support requirements.

Maria,  Would you provide me with a list of the "clearing houses" you use
today.  I'll give this to Bob Crane to see if he has a preference or other
comments.

Call or write if you have a chance early next week so we can figure this
out.  I'll be out of the office tomorrow (Friday).

Thanks for your help.

Jeff

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Barry Pearce                           02/24/99 11:22 AM

To: Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Documentation from OM

Thanks

London Team in Support of your activities

Barry Pearce - Administration & Accounting
Maria Nartey - Settlements/Margining
Mark Elliott - Legal
Brigitta Millard - Documentation


Meeting 3:
We have an extremely tight interview schedule next Tuesday with the first
interview scheduled for 8am. I propose meeting at 7:30am to quickly review
candidate responses to the pre-interview questions. Please let me know if
this time change is a problem. Breakfast and lunch will be provided.

Revised Meeting 3 Specifics:
Where - 1400 Smith, conference room 50M3
When - Tuesday, March 6, 7:30am - 2pm
Parking - Allen Center Parking lot on Andrews St.

Interview List:
We have 10 individuals on the interview list - two dropped out for
essentially the same reason - no contract.

Lisa


Attached is a resume of Debra Ruby who I have known for many years.  She is
currently looking for a position in Houston as a corporate attorney.  I can
personally recommend Debra for a variety of legal positions within Enron.  I
would appreciate it if you reviewed her attached resume and if you think
there may be a fit within your organization, please contact her directly.

Thanks for taking the time to look at her experience.


I know Michael wants to go to your apt this afternoon.  If you do go there,
just give me a call to let me know you're there so we can coordinate pickup.

See you soon,

Kay


Charlene,

Please, help. This is a son of a professor at Berkeley who helps me a lot in
the recruiting process.
His son goes to Cornell. Can we invite him (the son, not the professor) to a
Super Saturday? I really want
to repay the debt to his father who is very instrumental in  my recruiting
efforts.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 04:37:25 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Yaron's Resume

?
 - Yaron-RESUME3.doc


OTC Firm                                             Trader                                                   Contact No.

AEP Energy                                          Lew Williams                                               614/324-4574

AIG Energy                                           John Casey                                     203/629-2738
Alberta Energy                                    Don Kelly                                      403/256-8307
Allegheny Energy Supply                Mike Schubicer                                             212-224-8736   (Jake Goldberg)
                                                                                (Alex Eaton)
Aquila Risk                                          Jerry Dalton                                    441/296-6779
                                                                Cory Chalack                                 414/296-6906
                (Utilicorp)                             Tom O'Grady                                                816/527-1564

Bank of America                 David Chang                                    212/933-2620
Bank of Montreal                                David Lee                                         212/605-1475
                                                                Anthony Demartino                             212/605-1484
Bank One                                             Brook Hamilton                                               312/732-7380
Bank Paribas                                       Herve Duteil                                     212/841-2058
                                                                Dora Sung                                      212/841-2530
Bankers/Deutsche                            Nigel Patterson                                              212/469-7839
BP Corporation                                   Albert Lamore                                  281/366-4962
                                                                Calvin Schlenke                                               281/366-7367
                                                                Scott Mastro                                   281/366-4289

Calpine Energy                                    Jeff Fox                                                  713/830-8360
                                                                Corey Amthor                                  713/830-8839
                                                                Randy Posejpal                                 713/830-8621
Cargill Inc.                                           Nathan Leaf                                        952/984-3832
                                                                Paul Webborn                                               952/984-3747
Cinergy Marketing                            Brad Banky                                    713/393-6873
Chase Manhatten                                Chris Cregar                                   212/834-2023
CIBC Financial                                    Chris Atkin                                     212/885-4463
ConAgra Energy                 Matt Gravelle                                 402/595-7200
Conective                                              Brad Hoese                                     302/452-6375
                                                                Leigh Ann Ben                                                302/452-6279
Conoco                                                   Neil Wood                                      281/293-1975
Constellation                                        Terrence Dineen                                                410/468-3610
                                                                Josh Thomas                                  410/468-3442
Coral Energy                                        Adam Venette                                  713/767-5586
                                                                Jeff Whitnah                                                713/767-5374
                                                                Tom Pickering                                             403/216-3526
                                                                Kevin Geiger                                   713/230-3916

Duke Energy Merchants                            Ben Pritchett                                                713/989-0875
Duke Energy Trading                 Cara Spicer                                    713/989-0969
                                                                Chris Springer                                               713/989-0967
                                                                John Nelson                                   713/989-0968
Dynegy                                                  John Pasteong                                               713/767-8509
Dynegy Canada                                    Mike Hays                                       403/213-8056
Dynegy Marketing                            Chad Shimaitis                                              713/787-8903
                                                                John Pastore                                  713/787-8509
                                                                Brian Rowe                                      713/507-8508

El Paso Energy                                     Foster Smith                                     713/420-4870
                                                                Jim Brooks                                  713/720-3070
                                                                Mark Feist                                       713/420-2294
Engage Canada                                    Toby McKenna                                               403/699-1256
                                                                Sandy McCullough                         403/699-1260
Entergy-Koch                                       Brenden O'Neil                                    713/544-4214
                                                                Mike Moss                                      713/544-5156
                                                                Matt Therrell                                                713/544-5976
                                                                Blake Hill                                         713/544-4058

Florida Power                                       Raj Lall                                                 561/625-7105
                                                                Dan Wheeler                                                561/625-7025

Hess Energy                                         Mark Horowitz
                                                                Fred Kaplan
                                                                Jason Bierman

Idacorp                                                   Greg Hargis                                   713/435-8276

J Aron & Company                               Herb Petry
                                                                Mark Griffiths
                                                                Paul Bachman                                               212/902-8616
                                                                Rita Nagle
                                                                Owen West
                                                                Gerry Ann Dan

Kinder Morgan                                    Mark Houghtaling                         713/369-8886

LG&E                                                    Chris Balmer                                  502/627-4578
                                                                Dale Henson                                  502/627-4270
Louis Dreyfus Energy                   Gary Skolnick
Louis Dreyfus Co.                          Demetrios Diakolios                         203/761-8177
                                                                Doug Jones

Marathon Gas                                      Jim Johnson                                 713/296-3701
Merrill Lynch                                      Jake Goldberg
Mirant/Soutehrn                 Denis Thorez                                   678/579-3440
                                                                Rob Cowig                                     678/579-3092
                                                                Todd Milligan                                                678/579-3315
Morgan Stanley                                   Steve Jamison                                 212/761-5930

Occidental Energy                   Jerry Lanier
Oneok                                                    Jeff Madous

Phibro                                                    Matt Hogan                                    203/221-5915
PSEG                                                     Fred Dimaria                                 973/297-2116
                                                                Craig Schaefer
Reliant Energy                                     John Swatek
                                                                Mike Stimson                                 713/207-4000
                                                                Steve McGinn
                                                                Cherryl Smith

Sempra Energy                                    Jeff Bussan                                  203/355-5108
                                                                Joe Howley                                   203/355-5100
                                                                David D'Alessandro                       203/355-5110
                                                                Brian Rickers                                 203/355-5053
                                                                Mike Sieckhaus                                             203/355-5144
                                                                Petri Verma                                    203/355-5112
Societe Generale                                 Alex Werner                                 212/278-5677

Texaco                                                   Ron Cowell
                                                                Don Freeland                                                713/752-7752
Tractabel                                               Jeff Avery                                     713/985-3850
Transcanada                                         Don Bresee                                   403/216-2959
TXU Energy                                          Manu Asthana                                 214/875-9888
                                                                Charlie Katz                                        214/875-9812

Virginia Power                                    John McCalla                                 804/273-4437
Vitol SA                                                Dale Qualls                                    713/230-1073

Western Gas                                        Mike Huggins                                                303/450-8370
Williams Energy                                 Dudley Poston                                    918/573-5821
                                                                Chuck Carlton                                  918/573-4259
                                                                Sonny Sachdeva                                               918/573-6071


Jan,

I have deleted this reference.  However, please review revisions.  FYI, the
new agreement was sent via messenger today for arrival by 5:00 pm.   Please
let me know if you have not received same.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


When: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).
Where: EB3748

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank You,
Adrial Boals
X58849


section 6 row 8
is your brother going to bring a friend?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Husser, Shanna
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	Re:

Where are our seats?

From:	Eric Bass/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/27/2001 01:43 PM
To:	Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

http://www.ticketcity.com/ticketbuy.asp?unique=UT100601&teamreq=tlong


SVMG ENERGY COMMITTEE MEMBERS, LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES & PRINCIPAL OFFICERS:

The California business community needs your help in opposing AB67 XX.  This
bill represents a dangerous attempt to rewrite SB78 XX, the Edison bail-out
legislation, which passed the Assembly last Friday.  After months of good
faith discussions the amendments the California Business Coalition so
strongly advocated for have been completely disregarded.  Direct Access
continues to be threatened and an unfair rate increase for large energy
users still lingers.

We urge you to contact your local delegation to express your opposition to
this inequitable legislation.  The Senate will be voting on SB67 XX
immediately.  If passed, the bill will go to the Assembly for vote tomorrow
morning.  Please contact members of both houses so that the concerns of the
California business community are clearly heard.

Attached please find the Business Coalitions floor alert, the SVMG's letter
opposing SB67 XX, as well as a spreadsheet with contact information for our
local legislative delegation.  Any effort in this regard will make a
difference.  Thank you for all of your help.

Sincerest Regards,

Carl Guardino


Attached are the latest drafts of 3 of the Cross-Guarantee agreements.  I
have the other nine as well, in case you need them.  The agreements are
basically identical with one exception.  The debt to Enron in Raptor 3
(approx. $259MM) is excluded from the Guarantees.  You may also note that
this debt is not represented on the DPRs which I sent earlier.  This is
because the formation of Raptor 3 was a failed FAS 125 transaction, therefore
we did not get sale treatment and can't recognize the debt in looking at
credit capacity.  Let me know if you have questions or if you need the other
nine guarantees.  Thanks,
Ron

----- Forwarded by Ron Baker/Corp/Enron on 01/03/2001 09:40 AM -----

	"Kornreich, Craig" <ckornreich@velaw.com>
	12/18/2000 04:55 PM

		 To: "Curry, Alicia" <acurry@velaw.com>, "Mintz, Jordan (Enron)"
<jordan.mintz@enron.com>, "'joel.ephross@enron.com'" <joel.ephross@enron.com>
		 cc: "'kevin.d.jordan@enron.com'" <kevin.d.jordan@enron.com>,
"'george.mckean@enron.com'" <george.mckean@enron.com>,
"'ryan.siurek@enron.com'" <ryan.siurek@enron.com>, "Patel Trushar (Enron)"
<trushar.patel@enron.com>, "Tiller, AnnMarie (Enron)"
<annmarie.tiller@enron.com>, "'brent.vasconcellos@enron.com'"
<brent.vasconcellos@enron.com>, "'ron.baker@enron.com'"
<ron.baker@enron.com>, "'clint.walden@enron.com'" <clint.walden@enron.com>,
"'alan.quaintance@enron.com'" <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, "Spradling, Mark"
<MSpradling@velaw.com>, "Halbert, Elaine" <ehalbert@velaw.com>
		 Subject: RE: Cross-Guarantees

Attached please find drafts of the 3 remaining Raptor Guaranty Agreements
(i.e., those where Pronghorn is the beneficiary).

Regards,

Craig S. Kornreich
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
2300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, TX 77002
Ph (713) 758-4816
Fax (713) 615-5862
E-mail: ckornreich@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - Talon (I) ifo Pronghorn (III) Cross-Guarantee.DOC
 - Timberwolf (II) ifo Pronghorn (III) Cross-Guarantee (v.2).DOC
 - Bobcat (IV) ifo Pronghorn (III) Cross-Guarantee.DOC


I took a crack at tightening up the E Next assignment language as it exists
in the overrides, for inclusion in WH form:

Peter, could you take first cut at the override letter?  We  may be having an
internal meeting at 930 central, and if so, will you be available by phone if
necessary?

Suz, please put the attachment in the notebook.

Thanks,

Kay


Since PNM is the only party taking issue here, we might do a quickie answer
clarifying the transportation and fuel language.   This might enable us to
get the type of netting and trading we want ($ vs. volumes) for both shipper
and operator imbalances at least until the GISB standards of netting and
trading are approved.  Maria

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/06/2000 09:27 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

I'm inclined to agree that its not worth responding to.  They also argued
that imbalances should not be dollar valued before netting and trading are
available, but that strikes me as an industry wid e policy issue and not a TW
specific issue.  Any other thoughts?  DF

Susan Scott
12/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

We did not answer protests to our Order 637 filing.

The gist of PNM's protest in RP00-626 is that we shouldn't be able to charge
a transport or fuel fee for our imbalance netting and trading service.  I
agree with PNM that our tariff language is vague in this regard.  What
exactly do we mean by "no additional cost...unless through the allocation
process, quantities may be subject to transportation and fuel"??   Can
someone help me with this?

Since we really did not want to make this compliance filing anyway, I would
say we probably wouldn't mind if FERC rejected our tariff sheet outright.
However, it's more likely that they will just instruct us to clarify our
language.  Or they could tell us to remove the "subject to transportation and
fuel" provision.  If we want to preserve our right to charge transport and
fuel, it might be worthwhile filing something in the way of an answer.
However, I am going to need some assistance in understanding what the
language means and why we think we can do it, so I can justify it to FERC.
Any comments you have in this regard would be appreicated.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/05/2000 05:18 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW

Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF


We have 4 of each of these available at $19 (or whatever face value is).
Just let me know what you want to do.

Thanks,

Kay

Carolyn George
01/23/2001 02:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Rodeo Tickets

The performances I am interested in are:

Clay Walker
Destiny's Child
Leanne Womak

Thanks,

Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith, EB3836A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439    Fax:  (713) 646-3393
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


- SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


Here's the revised version of the passages for your records.  I just spoke to Goeffrey Colvin and he is now ok with all the changes.

Thanks

Kal


I think all of us who deal with assets are running across confidentiality
hurdles in all kinds of agreements, including confidentiality agreements.  In
short, our business people need the ability to disclose agreements to
potential purchasers of projects, contracts and assets, and not all of our
forms allow this.

I'm trying to include an exception for "potential lenders and investors"
whenever I can (instead of just lenders). Does someone have a more artful or
effective solution?

Just wanted to share the thought so that more eyes could be watching for the
issue.

Kay


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 7569
SELLER_CODE = TEPC
SELLER_DUNS = 006902704
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/TEP/COR500SVL345/CORONADO-SPRINGERVILLE
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = CORONADO500
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = SPRINGER345
SOURCE = SRP
SINK = EPE
CAPACITY = 0
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 50
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = NON-FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = ON_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = TRANS
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 07/30/2001
STOP_TIME = 07/30/2001
CEILING_PRICE = 6.52
OFFER_PRICE = 3.00
BID_PRICE = 3.00
PRICE_UNITS = $/MWh
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = RECEIVED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = BILL.WILLIAMS.III@ENRON.COM
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 07/30/2001

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 07/30/2001
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = SCHEDULE FROM HE14PPT TO HE17PPT
SELLER_NAME = TEPC
SELLER_PHONE = (520)745-7193
SELLER_FAX = (520)571-4036
SELLER_EMAIL = ChrisD@TucsonElectric.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0