----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 08:51 AM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	10/11/2000 04:44 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 10/11/00

The EOL approvals for 10/11/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Vern,

I am now responsible for publishing the EES Gas Position Report.   It seems
that the websave version that I received in the attached email is not updated
to publish the EES report.  Could you please send me an updated version or
let me know what I need to do so that I can publish this report?

Thank you,
Robin
x57478

Gabriel Monroy
10/20/2000 07:56 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Executive Reports Add-In

---------------------- Forwarded by Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
07:54 AM ---------------------------
From: Vern Vallejo on 07/12/2000 06:04 PM
To: John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Richard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mason
Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Prejean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Chen/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Executive Reports Add-In

Attached is the latest version of the Add-In for publishing Executive
Reports.  It contains the "Pulp & Paper P&L", "Pulp & Paper Position", "Pulp
& Paper Price", "Emissions Summary", and "Natural Gas Net Fixed Price
Positions By Book (Ignores Correlation)" subroutines.

John Lavorato is expecting to see these publish reports in the updated viewer
tomorrow morning!

To use this latest version of the Add-In:

Close all instances of Excel.
Detach the attached websave2.xla file into the Microsoft Office's Library
directory.  Usually this is C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Library
Launch Excel.
Under the Tools menu selection, select Add-Ins...
In the "Add-Ins available" list, look for "Websave."  If present, uncheck
it.  This is the old version of the add-in.
There should be a "Websave2" in the list.  This is the current version of the
add-in.  Check it and click the OK button.

I've also attached a workbook containing a buttons for the new reports that
you can copy and paste into your production workbooks.

Here are the named range values and the sheet names for the reports:

Named Range	Sheet Name
nr_NGFixPB  	Natural Gas Net Fixed
nr_EmSum  	Emissions Summary
nr_PPPL  	Pulp & Paper P&L
nr_PPPos  	Pulp & Paper Position
nr_PPPrice  	Pulp & Paper Price


David,  What should we do in this situation.  Shonnie 31463
----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:02 PM -----

	Jessica A Wentworth@ENRON
	08/28/2000 05:50 PM

		 To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brian Bierbach/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken Choyce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: vehicle rental in Gillette

Question for you guys - because of our past experience and situation I wanted
to have you guys let me know what to do on insurance.

The Gillette office is going to lease a 4 wheel drive vehicle for 1 month.
The lease is through Enterprise and they are asking if we want them to add
insurance.  Enron doesn't have a corporate rate for Enterprise.  I don't want
to assume anything so should we have them add it or not?

I am checking into trying to lease from Avis because we do have a rental
agreement with them.

Thanks

Jessica

Car Rental Contracts

Rental car contracts for January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000 have been
awarded to:

National Car Rental and Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.

When you rent a vehicle from National or Avis under the Contract, the daily
rental rate includes two kinds of insurance:
Avis, the coverage is $100,000 per person/$300,000 per occurrence, and
$50,000 for property damage.
These coverage's only apply when the vehicle is rented at the contract rate
using the following state contract identifier numbers:

National - 5000838
Avis - A288200


Notice No. 01-68
February 28, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Implementation of Amendments to Exchange Disciplinary Rules to Permit
Restitution in Certain Cases
____________________________________________________________

Included below please find amendments that become effective today to NYMEX
Rules 8.03 (&Settlements8); 8.08 (&Settlement by the Adjudication
Committee8); 8.11 (&Decision8) and 8.55 (&Classification of Offenses8).  In
general, these rule amendments provide Exchange disciplinary committees,
including both NYMEX and COMEX Division disciplinary committees, with
explicit authority to include restitution as a sanction in a disciplinary
matter where quantifiable customer harm has resulted from a rule violation.

If you have any questions, please contact Nancy Minett, Compliance Counsel,
Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2940.

* * * *

[Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.]

Rule 8.03.  SETTLEMENTS

(A) When the Compliance Department concludes that a Rule violation has
occurred, and at any time prior to the submission of an Investigative Report
to the Business Conduct Committee, the Compliance Department may negotiate
with the Respondent and enter into a written Offer of Settlement with the
Respondent.  The Respondent may agree, without admitting or denying a Rule
violation, to an Offer of Settlement which may provide for a cease and desist
order, a censure,     ** an order directing restitution to any injured
person, ** and a fine of not more than $5,000 for each Rule violation
alleged, or any combination of such penalties.  Any such settlement is
subject to the approval of the Business Conduct Committee.

[Sections (B) and (C) remain unchanged.]

(D) Any Offer of Settlement agreed to under Sub-Sections (B) or (C) of this
Rule may provide for a cease and desist order, a censure, ** an order
directing restitution to any injured person,** a fine not to exceed $25,000
for each Rule violation alleged, an expulsion or suspension from all or some
rights and privileges of membership, the ability to hold a permit, Electronic
Trading Privileges, employment on the Exchange Floor or employment for the
purpose of entering orders on NYMEX ACCESS for a period not to exceed three
(3) months for each Rule violation alleged, or any combination of such
penalties.

[Section (E) remains unchanged.]

Rule 8.08. SETTLEMENT BY THE ADJUDICATION COMMITTEE

(A) If the Respondent wishes to settle a matter at any time after the filing
of the complaint with the Chairman of the Adjudication Committee, the
Respondent may submit a written settlement offer.  The settlement offer will
be directed to the NYMEX Division Hearing Panel or the COMEX Division Hearing
Panel, as applicable, that has not been assigned the case to hear and
decide.  The Compliance Department may recommend to that Hearing Panel an
approval or a rejection of any settlement offer.  Such offer may provide for
the issuance of a cease and desist order, a censure, ** an order directing
restitution to any injured person, ** a fine not to exceed $250,000 for each
violation alleged to have been committed, an expulsion or suspension from all
or some rights and privileges of membership, the ability to hold a permit,
electronic trading privileges, employment on the Exchange Floor, or
employment for the purposes of entering orders on NYMEX ACCESS or any
combination of such pen!
al!
ties.

[The remainder of the Rule remains unchanged.}

Rule 8.11 DECISION

[Sections (A) through (J) remain unchanged.]

(K) If the Hearing Panel determines to order the imposition of a penalty, the
penalties which may be imposed are any one or combination of the following:
the issuance of a cease and desist order, a censure, ** an order directing
restitution to any injured person, ** a fine of not more than $250,000 for
each Rule violation found to have been committed, an expulsion or a
suspension from all or some rights and privileges of membership, the ability
to hold a permit, Electronic Trading Privileges, employment on the Exchange
Floor, or employment for the purposes of entering orders on NYMEX ACCESS.

[The remainder of the Rule remains unchanged.]

Rule 8.55. CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES

Offenses against the Exchange shall be classified as major offenses and minor
offenses.  Major offenses shall be punishable by **one or more of the
following:** expulsion, suspension **from all or some rights and privileges
of membership, the ability to hold a permit, Electronic Trading Privileges,
employment on the Exchange Floor, or employment for the purposes of entering
orders on NYMEX ACCESS,** a fine of not more than $250,000, **cease and
desist order, or an order directing restitution to any injured person.**
[or by both suspension and fine].  Minor offenses shall be punishable by
**one or more of the following:** a fine of no more than $10,000  **cease and
desist order, order directing restitution to any injured person** or
suspension for not more than one year ** from all or some rights and
privileges of membership, the ability to hold a permit, Electronic Trading
Privileges, employment on the Exchange Floor, **or employment for the
purposes of entering orders on !
NY!
MEX** ACCESS ** [; or both].  Unless good cause is shown, any offense
involving fraudulent or deceitful trading practices detrimental to a customer,
s order shall be a Major Offense and shall be punishable, at a minimum, with
a suspension or revocation of the Member,s or NYMEX ACCESS Operator,s right
to execute customer orders.

[The remainder of the rule remains the same.}

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-68)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


This article stems from confidential docs submitted to the Governor's office,
which were leaked to the press.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/02/2001 09:54 AM -----

	smara@enron.com
	Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
	05/02/2001 09:51 AM
	Please respond to smara

		 To: smara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by smara@enron.com.

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

By JEFF GERTH and LOWELL BERGMAN

 uke Energy, a power-generating company accused of overcharging
customers millions of dollars during California's year-old energy
crisis, has secretly offered Gov. Gray Davis a deal that it hopes
will solve its legal problems while helping to calm the state's
chaotic electricity markets.

 The proposed settlement, outlined in documents prepared in March
by Duke's lawyers, calls for an end to various state
investigations, private lawsuits and state complaints to federal
authorities accusing Duke of overcharging.

 In return, Duke would make an unspecified "appropriate payment"
but admit no wrongdoing.

 "Duke is committed to sharing pain" and "expediting high-level
confidential discussions that would embrace the governor's
political and public relations needs," according to the documents,
which were given to The New York Times by someone who wanted the
issue aired publicly.

 Governor Davis acknowledged the secret discussions in an interview
in San Francisco yesterday, and said he hoped to meet with more
generators soon. But he insisted that none of the companies would
escape a substantial payment because, he said, they have penalized
the state with excessive prices.

 "My general approach to the energy companies is that you have
already charged the utilities a 50 percent credit penalty for the
power they were buying from you," Mr. Davis said, so "you're going
to have to have a very substantial reduction" in what the companies
are owed.

 Mr. Davis said Duke had walked in with "a number of demands,"
including an end to state inquiries but that that was not likely to
happen.

 "We're not about to call off the dogs," said the governor, a
Democrat who will seek re-election next year.

 Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is a major investor in
California's wholesale electricity market, having spent more than
$1 billion since the state opened its generating plants to outside
operators in 1996.

 It is also near the top of the list of companies accused of
overcharging. Duke has been ordered by federal regulators to
justify or refund $20 million in disputed charges this year, an
amount that is third-highest among federally regulated companies in
the California market.

 By entering secret negotiations with Mr. Davis and being the first
generator to settle, Duke could gain a public-relations advantage,
in much the same way that the Liggett Group donned a white hat by
being the first company to open talks with the state governments in
the tobacco-litigation wars.

 "We've just simply tried to be part of the solution," Richard B.
Priory, Duke's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview,
adding that the company was "offering ideas" and "throwing in
suggestions."

 Publicly, Mr. Davis has disparaged out-of-state electricity
generators before and after he began talking with them privately.
In an interview two weeks ago with The Los Angeles Times, he called
the generators "the biggest snakes on the planet Earth" for their
pricing practices.

 California's electricity costs have risen to about $28 billion
last year from $7 billion in 1999. By some estimates, they could
approach $70 billion this year * $2,000 for every resident. The
state has stepped in to buy power for financially crippled
utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric, which is now in
bankruptcy court.

 The Davis administration has struck power deals with companies
like Duke in hopes of securing a stable and affordable source of
power. To pay those bills, Mr. Davis is seeking the largest
municipal bond issue in American history, $12 billion, although
some state officials privately estimate that the final amount will
be higher.

 The governor hopes the bond issue will eventually take the state's
taxpayers off the hook. But how those costs are allocated among
ratepayers, utilities and generators, and whether the bond issue
can even succeed, remain unanswered questions. A major impediment
to resolving the electricity crisis, according to state officials,
utility executives and economists, is the secrecy surrounding the
administration's negotiations.

 Several Republicans have sued the Davis administration to learn
the terms of specific contracts entered into by the state. On
Monday, the administration released a 67-page financial analysis,
including its most detailed disclosure about the overall costs of
state electricity contracts. Last week Republicans blocked
legislation that Mr. Davis says he needs to pass the bond issue.
The bill could come up for a vote later this week.

 "The thing that has hindered Governor Davis the most among the
legislative ranks is the demand for secrecy over the negotiations
and the agreements that have been reached," said Senator Joseph L.
Dunn, a Democrat from Santa Ana and the chairman of a select
committee investigating the price spikes.

 Mr. Davis, in the interview, said there were legitimate commercial
reasons for keeping contract terms confidential.

 The political uncertainty has spilled over into the markets, where
the bonds would have to be sold. The state's credit rating, while
still solid, is slipping.

 Already companies that do business with California, like Duke, are
citing the state's creditworthiness as a reason for charging higher
prices in their dealing with the state, though the state has
stepped in as buyer since February.

 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently ordered
generators to justify high prices in California this year or pay
$125 million in refunds. The companies * including Duke, Reliant
Energy, Dynegy Inc. and the Williams Company * deny any wrongdoing
and cite the state's credit situation as one reason for the high
prices.

 Mr. Priory, the Duke chairman, said that resolution of credit
issues would lead his company to drop the so-called "credit
premium" it now charges on power sales. As of March 7, Duke was
owed more than $100 million by the state's power managers,
documents show.

 In its confidential submission to Mr. Davis and his aides, Duke
said it would "forgive an appropriate amount of certain
receivables, or make an appropriate payment based upon a
methodology that fairly represents its share of alleged
overcharges."

 The documents do not give an amount, but Duke's 2000 annual report
shows that its wholesale energy division had written off $110
million for power sales to California that had not been collected.
(Even with that write-off, the unit's profits before taxes doubled
from 1999 to 2000, and quadrupled for the first quarter of this
year.)

 Duke's "preliminary global settlement template" of March 9 goes
on: "Duke is committed to sharing pain with state and others on a
fair and equitable basis, without admitting legal liability,
because Duke has done nothing illegal."

 Duke says that much of its California power was sold last year on
the forward markets, not the more volatile and higher-priced spot
markets. But Mr. Priory also noted in his interview that at least
10 percent was sold for "whatever the market price is."

 On March 23, Duke's lawyer, at the request of Mr. Davis's legal
affairs secretary, forwarded to the governor's office additional
information about pending litigation involving Duke and its power
sales in California. The documents show that a top Duke priority is
the "prompt suspension of state investigations, lowering of
rhetoric and stay of state litigation," as well as the withdrawal
of state-related claims at the federal energy commission.

 Also in March, the operators of the state's power grid told the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that wholesale electricity
prices in California were more than $6 billion above competitive
prices over the previous 10 months. Duke has questioned the
methodology of that submission and wants the claim withdrawn.

 The inquiries of concern to Duke include those being conducted by
the office of the attorney general, William Lockyer, and the
California Public Utilities Commission.

 Barry P. Goode, the governor's legal affairs secretary, says he
subsequently referred Duke's lawyer to the attorney general's
office. The two state agencies say that their inquiries are
continuing. Sandra Michioku, a spokeswoman for Mr. Lockyer, said,
"Our investigation is ongoing."

 Loretta Lynch, the president of the utility commission, said in a
telephone interview yesterday, "The public utilities commission has
not been involved in any settlement discussions with generators and
our investigations into overcharges and withholding are ongoing and
strong."

 The Duke documents say the company should be given preferential
treatment for its conciliatory stance.

 Other generators said they were not involved in settlement
discussions with Mr. Davis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02DAVI.html?ex=989822260&ei=1&en=70
3c8bd8125d53df

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 04:46 PM -----

	Brent Hendry
	11/29/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: D'Arcy Carroll/SA/Enron@Enron, trandyyoung/sa/enron@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lynn Aven/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Financial Swap - Aracruz

We had concluded early on in our due diligence in Brazil that financial
transactions should be conducted offshore by both the Brazilian entity and
Enron.  However, we have not conducted any due diligence on Panama to
determine if Panamanian counterparties can enter into derivative transactions
with ENA.  Are there any other offshore subsidiaries in any other
jurisdictions that could be used for this trade?

Is this due diligence something that you want to move forward on or is the
deal still in the early stages?  I would guess that the due diligence could
cost around $15,000 to $25,000 and could take from one to two weeks to
complete and there would be no guarantee that financial transactions would be
allowed.

Randy, do you know of any counsel in Panama that Enron has worked with in the
past?

Regards,
Brent

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/29/2000 03:53 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: D'Arcy Carroll/SA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

per my voice mail
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 03:52 PM -----

	D'Arcy Carroll@ENRON
	11/29/2000 04:32 PM

		 To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

Randy/Sara,

Please confirm if Enron can or cannot execute a financial swap with Aracruz
Brazil.

Alternatively, we need input on Enron's ability to execute a financial swap
for pulp with Aracruz's off-shore, Panamanian  subsidiary.

We are trying to prep for a discussion scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday
afternoon, Sao Paulo time (4 hours ahead of Houston).

Thanks your help.


There will be a Staff Meeting with Kevin Presto TODAY in 32c2 from 4 - 5pm.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO offices will be closed for normal business on
Monday, December 24 and Tuesday, December 25.  We will
reopen on Wednesday, December 26.  Happy Holidays!

Regards,

Customer Relations
518-356-6060


Universal Analog/Digital TV Cable Converter/Descrambler!!
ON SALE NOW ONLY $345. Shipping Included!
Call Today 1-888-817-0777
Gets all channels offered by your cable company
including Pay Per View, HBO, Showtime, ESPN, Playboy...
Works coast to coast on all cable systems
Installs in minutes - so easy anyone can do it!
30 Day Money Back Guarantee
3 Year Warranty
Legally own your own cable box
CALL TODAY 1-888-817-0777
If you are in receipt of this email in error and/or wish to be removed from our list, PLEASE CLICK HERE  AND TYPE REMOVE.


I don't see how you get the numbers.  Can you please explain.  I don't have
the time to do this right now and I have to get the email off to the people
about sleeping arrangements.  I get 8 in one house and 5 in the other.
Please answer ASAP.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 11:22 AM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: Directions

oh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  In the "big" house, sleeps 10---3 kings
and 2 twins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  In the "little" house,
sleeps 6--2 queens and 1 trundle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

anything else!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cameron

Sellers              To:     "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"

<cameron@perf        <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

ect.com>             cc:

Subject:     RE: Directions

12/12/2000

01:18 PM

NO.  I need to know how many beds there are total!!!!!!!!!!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:           Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent:           Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:51 AM
To:        Cameron Sellers
Subject:        RE: Directions

naked, all in one bed.

star doesn't need a bed.  prentice and i will need a bed (hey, it's her
birthday!)  tom & karen are very iffy, but if they show, and stay overnight
(iffy times two), then they'll need a bed.  that work?


Forwarding to you at the request of Christi Nicolay.
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 09:58
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 07/05/2001 09:12 AM
To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Southern RTO

Latest info on Southern for your meeting with Kean and Ed Holland today.

----- Forwarded by Joe Connor/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 09:10 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	07/02/2001 04:20 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Southern RTO

Steve --

If still ok, I think that we should try and establish the date for the
Southern - Enron meeting per Joe's message below.  It would be good to hear
their viewpoints (just to know where they are coming from).

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 07/02/2001
04:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor on 07/02/2001 10:43 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I met with Andy Dearman and Bill Newman of Southern on Friday.  They talked
about what is going on with the non-jurisdictional utilities that have signed
a MOU to develop a RTO.  The group has met a couple of times to discuss the
process they will use.  Confidentiality agreements have been signed, so no
details are available, but they have agreed to a voting structure for the
development.  Southern has about one third of the votes (and 65%of the
assets) and it takes at least two other parties agreeing with Southern to
carry a vote.  Southern says they spent a lot of time convincing the other
parties that Southern was not going to run, or dominate, the process.  After
that, Southern said the group started to pull together and get organized for
the development.

They said everyone in the group appeared to be ready to find ways to make the
RTO work and resolve the hurdles the non-jurisdictional utilities have been
expressing with the development of other RTOs.  They said there were some
rough spots that had to be resolved and they couldn't be sure agreement would
be reached, but at this point there was a lot of cooperation.

Andy and Bill wanted to convince me that this was not a delaying tactic by
Southern and they were doing everything possible to ensure that a complete
RTO filing could be ready by 12/15/01.  They also said they thought this is
what Ed Holland wanted to discuss with Steve Kean.

We talked about how other stakeholders could have input to the development.
They said that it was too early to make any commitment, but the group had
started thinking about it and they expected an input process to be available
by late summer.
They said Southern was in favor of some process that would provide
stakeholders the opportunity to look at what was being considered and advise
the development group as early as possible.  They said they understood the
difficulty stakeholders had with the approach Southern used in its initial
filing and wanted to do it different, but they pointed out again that
Southern could not dictate the process that would be allowed by the group.
In the meantime, they said if we wanted to provide position papers on any
part of the RTO development they would make sure the papers were circulated
in the group or we could continue to hold bilateral discussions with them or
other members of the development group.

Jim, I still think it would be worthwhile to have a meeting between Ed and
Steve Kean, and I would include you and invite Andy and Bill to come.  I
don't think they want to discuss anything technical at this point; they just
want to convince Enron that the approach Southern is taking provides the
quickest development of a RTO for the Southern area, and they want any help
we can give in convincing FERC to let this process run.

I also think we need to pass on filing a response to Southern's May 15th
status report, either alone or with Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (
Donna, I guess that's who you meant in the memo below, since AEC has signed a
MOU with Southern?).  I will get in touch with Bob Reilley to find out why we
haven't heard from EPSA on its filing.  I still think that's the best
approach.

	Donna Fulton
	06/28/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Southern  supplemental status report

I am attaching the supplemental status report that Southern filed in its
RT01-77 on June 20.  They have included MOUs with Georgia Transmission Corp,
Santee Cooper and Alabama Electric Coop to work on development of an RTO.
These are really general, more of the same of what we've seen from Southern.

Also we had talked  about possible comments on the May 15 Southern filing;
Coral was working on comments through EPSA.  Nothing has been filed by EPSA
yet.

Alabama did file comments on the May 15 status report and they have asked
that the FERC establish a technical conference to "publicly air and evaluate
the alleged governance concerns and the concerns regarding significant
delay..."  Following a technical conference, they ask for a judge to convene
a settlement conference at FERC to "undertake a properly supervised and
serious development of an RTO for the SE without further wasted time."

At this point we could consider filing comments in support of the Coop
comments.


I tried sending this email about 3 weeks ago and had problems.   So here it
is.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 04:30
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
07/17/2000 11:31 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sale to EES for April

james r barker ees      patricia downey ees

donnie myers/na/enron

ENA sold EES 5,000 dth a day delivered on Iroq Zone 1.  The price is $3.14.
The total volume is 150,000 for the month.  Patricia is only showing a
purchase in your system of 140,000 for the month.  I think you forgot to put
in some of the buy/sale activity.

My system shows ENA delivered 130,000 to Canajoharie and 5,000 to Tenn-Wright
one day (you though little ol' ENA was taking advantage of you).  For 3 days
we bought the gas back from you and we are showing the buy/sale activity at
Tenn-Wright.  The total buy/sale volume is 15,000.  I think you need to add
another 10,000 to your buy/sale activity.

Let me know if you have any questions.  Buddy


Testing.  Sell low and buy high
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
04:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           01/12/2001 08:58 AM

To: 8774820206@pagenetmessage.net
cc:
Subject:

testing