Yes, partly.  I saw John last week and he told me that his wife was due to deliver their second child on November 9 and he would possibly miss the conference.  However, I know Mark was also interested in having women represented and liked having both you and Janet on the panel to balance things out.

I know you'll do a great job -- you always do!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:04 PM
To:	James, Terrie
Subject:	RE: Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Is it me and not Lavo due to him maybe not attending

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Kitchen, Louise; Sherriff, John; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy; Clark, Morris; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Daw, Nicki
Subject:	Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Hello All,

I'm planning the agenda for this year's Management Conference.  I've been working on the upcoming meeting since March, but as you can imagine, the direction has changed several times.

We are delighted to have General Norman Schwarzkopf delivering a keynote address on leadership, and Gary Hamel returning to help us process the past year.  While we have arranged an all-star line up of outside speakers, we also want to focus on what is happening inside Enron.  Rather than having only one or two business presentations, Mark Frevert has opted to moderate a panel to provide a high level overview of each of our primary operating units and has selected each of you to participate.

Currently, the panel is scheduled to take place 8:00-9:30am on Friday, November 16.  Please plan to present a very high level overview of your business.  You are welcome to use PowerPoint slides, but in the interest of time, presentations must be no more than 10 minutes.  Mark will introduce each of you, interject questions, encourage interaction, and ensure we stay on time.

Below is the proposed order for your presentations.  Regardless of your place in the rundown, you will need to be seated on stage by 7:50am and equipped with a microphone.  Because we have a full agenda that morning, we will try to begin the session promptly at 8:00am.

Stan Horton - Global Services
Louise Kitchen - Americas
John Sherriff - Europe
Mike McConnell - Global Markets
Jeff McMahon - Industrial Markets
Janet Dietrich - Retail

If you elect to use a PowerPoint presentation, please forward it to me electronically by Friday, November 9 or provide the presentation to me on CD at the Management Conference.  To ensure consistancy, I've attached a PowerPoint template that I would like you to use.

 << File: Sample Bullet Slide.ppt >>

Finally, Mark would like to meet with the six of you to finalize preparation for the panel at 4:00pm on Wednesday, November 14 following your arrival at the Management Conference.  The meeting will take place in the Library off the Main Lobby of the Westin La Cantera.  In the meantime, if you have any questions or need any assistance, please contact me.  I look forward to working with you.

Regards,
Terrie James
Senior Director, Corporate Communication
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


Sorry, I lost track of the versions. Here are my two questions/comments:

What are we gaining or losing by putting a drop dead date of March 2004?

On 2.11, I think relinquishing them from "damage" is broader than it needs to
be, since the contract language is "risk of loss".  However, if the deal is
that they are off the hook for cosmetic deterioration during storage, I think
that can be addressed specifically in the change order.

Kay

From: Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/22/2001 03:40 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: BlueDog Change Order #2, Rev 6

Kay:
We are sill awaiting your approval to proceed with this revision of CO 2
(Storage of Unit 1) for Blue Dog.  Your last comment that I did not get GE to
agree to was the change to their responsibility for cosmetic deterioration
during storage.  They believe that any cosmetic deteriation in storage would
be viewed as their fault, therefore there was no real distinction of fault.
They want to be off the hook for normal deterioration that occurs during our
storage in their storage facility.

PS.  Storage has begun.
----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/22/2001 03:33 PM
-----

	Brian D Barto
	02/07/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BlueDog Change Order #2, Rev 6

----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/07/2001 05:13 PM
-----

	Brian D Barto
	02/07/2001 04:50 PM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: BlueDog Change Order #2, Rev 6

That was incredibly fast.


********* Welcome to Bestfares.com's HOT DEALS BY EMAIL ************

BESTFARES.COM is your source for HOT TRAVEL DEALS. Visit our home
page at http://www.bestfares.com. Also, remember to visit our Newsdesk
daily at http://www.bestfares.com/travel_center/desks/newsdesk.asp
where we post hundreds of deals every day that could save you up
to 70% every time you travel! Subscribe and unsubscribe information
can be found at the bottom of this newsletter.

**************************** November 14, 2000  ************************

Step into this season of celebration with fares you can count among your
travel blessings. This week, the major airlines cut airfares for travel
during the Thanksgiving, Hanukah. Christmas, Kwanzaa and New Year,s
holidays. You can even use them for Pins & Needles Day (November 27),
National Lemon Cupcake Day (December 15) and National Bicarbonate of Soda
Day (December 30). These fares are good enough to celebrate any time--and
our members can save even more. Our biggest fare surprise this week is
Australia and New Zealand for departure through January 7. You can enjoy
the holidays Down Under at fares far below usual holiday rates. Bargain
fares to the Caribbean, Mexico and South America are almost sold out for
December 14 through January 12 travel, but we do have some specials to
Costa Rica, Belize and Mexico City for travel through December 14.  If you
can get away during this period, please act fast.  These deals are in very
limited supply. Read on for airfare bargains for the next several months
that can give you a feast of travel without gobbling up your money.

USA HOLIDAY FARES AT UP TO 65% OFF FOR TRAVEL THRU JANUARY 7th
This week we have fares for travel through Thanksgiving, and for travel
December 14 through January 7, taking in most of the year-end holiday
periods. This year, you won,t have to shop for sales at the mall, then
settle for non-sale air travel prices. To receive the maximum discount,
travel on off-peak days. Seniors age 62 and above and companions of any
age receive an additional 10 percent discount. The lowest holiday fares
allow travel November 23, 24, 29 & 30 and December 14, 18, 19, 20, 24 &
25. The second level of fares is available for travel November 20 & 28;
December 15, 16, 17, 28, 29 & 31; and January 1, 2 6 & 7.  Check out our
holiday fares at http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10104951.

HOLIDAY IN CANADA FROM $60 RT
Fly roundtrip to Canada, our scenic northern neighbor, for as little as
$60 (Seattle-Vancouver) through January 7. If you have a longer distance
to cover, no problem, eh? San Francisco-Vancouver is just $112 roundtrip.
Fly from Portland (OR) for just $93. If you crave the cosmopolitan flair
of Toronto, pay just $85 roundtrip from Detroit, Cleveland or Pittsburgh.
Enjoy the many charms and the French flair of Montreal for $85 roundtrip
from Hartford, $91 from Newark or $100 from Boston and Providence. Many
other sale fares are available. Once you arrive, use the very favorable
exchange rate to stretch your vacation dollars for shopping,
recreation*perhaps even a luxury hotel stay at a rate that will make you
smile. If you want to give a great travel gift, these tickets could fill
the bill, providing a gateway to a varied and economical country. For
booking, access http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10044703.

EUROPE,S ON SALE FROM $248 RT FOR TRAVEL THRU JANUARY 7th
Book a transatlantic treat with roundtrip travel to London from $248,
Paris from $262, Milan from $285 and Brussels from $298. Enjoy
Thanksgiving dinner with a European flair*Cordon Bleu to Biscotti*or spend
the year-end holidays in Europe,s great cities. Now is the time to buy.
Fly from Los Angeles to Frankfurt for only $304 roundtrip, from San
Francisco to Madrid for only $368 roundtrip or from New York City or
Boston to Paris for only $262 roundtrip. You can even enjoy two European
cities with free London stopover fares. For example, depart from New York
City, Newark, Boston or Philadelphia, spend some time enjoying wonderful
London, then travel on to your choice of Frankfurt, Munich or Dusseldorf
(enjoy the traditional Christmas markets) or to Amsterdam or Brussels*and
do it all for just $298. Start making your European travel dream come true
by accessing http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10089904.

SAVE UP TO $700 ON AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND ROUNDTRIPS
Just a week ago, the lowest published roundtrip fare to Sydney, Melbourne
or Auckland was $1,599. This week, you can depart through December 11 or
from December 24 through January 7 for only $838 roundtrip. Pay just $666
roundtrip for children ages two through 11. These fares (for West Coast
departures) are almost unheard of for holiday travel. We also have great
discounts for departure from cities across the United States. It,s balmy
summertime Down Under*plus the U.S. dollar is strong against the
Australian dollar. Many of the attractions created for the just-ended
Olympic Games also await your pleasure. And, if you want to travel within
Australia, two low-fare carriers (Impulse and Virgin Blue) offer bargain
fares. For travel to:
 - Brisbane visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106404
 - Auckland visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106403
 - Melbourne visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106402
 - Sydney visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106401.

SUN & FUN IN THE CARIBBEAN FROM $169 ROUNDTRIP
You can almost empty out your change jar to cover the cost of these
Caribbean bargains. We have sale fares to San Juan from 81 U.S. cities,
that bring you this Puerto Rico paradise for as little as $180 roundtrip
for travel through March 28. The $180 fare covers departure from New York
City. Travel by December 13 and you can fly for just $169. The roundtrip
fare from Fort Lauderdale is just $200. Fly from Orlando for $222, from
Boston for $252 and from Chicago for $286. Western U.S.-based travelers
pay just $414 for departure from Denver, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, Seattle or Las Vegas. These fares represent savings of as much
as 50 percent and they are not available for travel December 18 through
January 8. If another Caribbean island beckons, we can also get you there
for less with sale fares to destinations including St. Thomas, St.
Maarten, St. Croix and Antigua.  Access
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10088489.

NEWLY REDUCED FARES TO COSTA RICA,
BELIZE, MEXICO CITY & MORE
Head for some of the most desirable locations south of the U.S. border
through December 14 and save big. All of Central America is on sale, from
Panama City to Belize. This is a terrific opportunity for eco-adventure
travelers and others who want to visit this fascinating area. We also have
sale fares for popular destinations in Mexico, including Monterrey,
Guadalajara and Leon.  All of their popular and traditional charms are
enhanced with spa vacation opportunities that pamper you at prices you,re
not likely to find in the States. Airfares have been reduced by as much as
$300. Sample fares include Los Angeles-Belize City at $300, Dallas/Fort
Worth-Costa Rica and Los Angeles-Puerto Vallarta at $269. Access
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10074381.

EUROFARE IS BACK! HOPSCOTCH EUROPE FOR ONLY $89 PER FLIGHT
If you want to see city after city in Europe on a cheap buck there is only
one word to say and it,s &Eurofare.8  Imagine flying from Paris to Rome
for $89 or how about London to Amsterdam for that same incredibly low
rate?  All you have to do is purchase a round-trip transatlantic ticket on
Lufthansa or United Airlines from the USA to Europe and then you can
travel to more than 100 cities in 35 countries within Europe for only $89
per flight.  That,s right, Lufthansa Airlines, Eurofare is back and it,s
taking you on a ride to your favorite European cities for only $89 per
flight!

One-way fares from Frankfurt to Rome are as high as $871 and Munich to
Paris currently sells for $345 on a major European Airline. At $89 per
flight for the same cities Eurofare is a great bargain! To qualify book a
roundtrip airline ticket on Lufthansa or United Airlines now through March
30, 2001 and you can add up to six additional flights within Europe for
only $89 per flight.  Your originating transatlantic flight must depart by
March 31, 2001 and your roundtrip travel must be completed by April 7,
2001.

Some restrictions and blackouts apply so you may want to read our full
story by visiting: http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105980 or visit
Lufthansa,s web site at:
http://www.lufthansa-usa.com/bf_efe_oc00.html.

EUROPEAN CAR RENTALS STARTING AS LOW AS $14 A DAY
Our car rental partner, Auto Europe, is having a great year-end sale for
rentals booked online before December 15, 2000. During this sale you can
expect to shave up to 20% off their already low standard rates for car
rentals through end of next year (12/30/01)!  And, Auto Europe is
sweetening the deal by also throwing in a free one-week cellular phone
rental during this sale. For example, below are some of Auto Europe,s low
standard rates and if you book online during this sale you can save up to
20% more:

3-day rental in Paris - $60 (That,s only $20 a day!)
3-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $79 ($26 a day!)
7-day rental in Paris - $100 (That,s only $14 a day!)
7-day rental in Munich, Frankfurt and Berlin - $132 ($19 a day!)

With savings like these on car rentals and airfares, there,s no reason why
you shouldn,t book a wonderful European vacation today. For complete
details click to our Newsdesk story at:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10105981. Or, book your European
rental car by visiting Auto Europe,s web site at
http://www.autoeurope.com/welcome.cfm?c=15.

********************************************************************

HOT DEALS BY EMAIL announcements feature special money-saving offers
available on Bestfares.com. This free, weekly newsletter is your
best bet to receive great, late-breaking travel deals.

Please feel free to send this newsletter to your colleagues, friends
and family and encourage them to sign up for a free subscription to
HOT DEALS BY EMAIL. Thanks to all of you who have already recommended
this newsletter to others. If this email has been forwarded to you,
you can get your own free subscription at:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

About your privacy: Our email list is used only for distribution of
our own materials. Our subscriber list will not be sold, rented, or
otherwise made available to third parties

********************************************************************

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

To subscribe to the HOT DEALS BY EMAIL newsletter, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

To unsubscribe from HOT DEALS BY EMAIL, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp

To change your email address, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp
and unsubscribe from Hot Deals. Then go to:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp
and register your new email address.

Although every effort is made to ensure accurate information,
Bestfares.com is not responsible for any errors in this newsletter.


In the effort to understand this better is it fair to say that wholesale block prices between Friday afternoon and today have fallen on the offer side by $7.00 MWHr?

For example, these were the prices on Friday:

	Jack in the Box	PG&E	Offer	$41.15;	A/S	$4.93;	Block to Shape	$1.25 = Total $47.33.

The total price to Jack was $60.31 and includes the following additional charges $3.03 losses, $3.40 interzonal congestion; $1.75 uplifts; $1.80 ISO charges; $0.50 settlements and $2.50 "contract/legal".

I don't believe ancillaries and shape have changed dramatically; therefore, it would suggest that wholesale markets have changed by the number indicated above.

Our information would suggest that SP 15 and NP 15 on-peak has not changed by this amount between Friday to today.

This leads to two results:
	a) the generator price is closer to our original offer and
	b) our original offer on Friday was out of market and EES paid too much for supply.

Each dollar on the California deals is approximately $2.0M in value recognized in the wholesale versus retail organizations.

Please clarify.

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 09/25/2001 05:13 PM ---------------------------
From:	Loretta Brooks/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/25/2001 04:15 PM
To:	Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Janet Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:	FW: Energy and Ancillary Service Pricing

Here is the bid offers for the product you are looking at.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	Energy and Ancillary Service Pricing

Below are our bid/offers for the product described in the confirmation drafted by Steve Hall.  A different confirm could change these prices.  It is my understanding that the deal team has not yet agreed to the Steve Hall version of the confirm.

Please note that these prices are for a stipulated hourly shape and include CAISO energy and associated ancillary services including regulation up, regulation down, spin, non-spin, and replacement reserves.  This pricing also assumes a good credit, wholesale counterparty with no regulatory contingencies or recission rights.  It also assumes that liquidated damages/early termination payments are cleaner than those associated with retail load contracts as all of these products exist in the wholesale market independent of whether direct access exists or not.

Here they are:

Term			10/1/2001 to 12/31/2004
Region			Mixed SP15
PVMWh		608,607
Bid			$37.25
Offer			$40.85

Term			10/1/2001 to 9/30/2004
Region			NP15
PVMWh		148,236
Bid			$37.50
Offer			$41.75

Term			10/1/2001 to 9/30/2004
Region			SP15-SCE
PVMWh		182,106
Bid			$37.45
Offer			$40.85

Term			10/1/2001 to 9/30/2004
Region			SP15-SDG&E
PVMWh		75,206
Bid			$37.50
Offer			$40.75


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/01/2000
03:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/30/2000 04:38 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Capacity Options

Drew, I thought you would be interested in this research memo from our law
clerk.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/30/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

Brian Hensley
06/30/2000 11:05 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Capacity Options

Susan,

Per your request, I have attached a brief memo concerning capacity option
exemptions and regulations.  If you have any questions or comments you would
like to discuss before the 3 p.m. meeting please do not hesitate to contact
me.  If the offer still stands, I would like to attend this afternoon's
meeting.

Brian

Ext. 37629


All,

Here is what the press have to say about our Japanese office opening, the
last sentence is of particular importance to the regulatory team.

Xi Xi

-----------------------------------------------------------

02 November 2000
??

Enron Broadband Services (EBS) has announced plans to enter Japan's telecoms
market with a variety of broadband-related services scheduled to start within
the next three years.

The announcement came at the launch of its wholly-owned subsidiary in Tokyo,
Enron Japan Corp., where Kenneth L. Lay, chairman and chief executive officer
of U.S.-based energy giant Enron Corp., spelled out the company's plans for
Japan.

Enron is to offer its clients, including other service providers and
corporates, a broadband fibre optic network - a backbone infrastructure for
network-based video content distribution - and the leasing of bandwidth on
high-capacity telecoms circuits, amongst other services, he said. The company
plans to have its Japanese fiber-optic network in place within the next two
or three years.

&Japan is a large and technologically advanced market, and we believe the
opportunities for our business here are tremendous,8 said Ken Rice, chairman
and chief executive of Enron Broadband Services. &We look forward to
developing mutually beneficial relationships with content providers and
distribution partners in Japan. This will extend our global reach and provide
our Japanese partners with the opportunity to give their customers the
highest quality Internet experience.8

EBS recently announced an agreement with i2, a U.S. electronic software
developer, to provide bandwidth capacity to meet its international networking
needs, including linking i2's Dallas headquarters with its Tokyo location. In
addition, EBS is developing a pooling point in Tokyo, which will facilitate
the buying and selling of bandwidth between Japan and the U.S.

The company also said it hoped to eventually supply Japan with the same
video-on-demand service planned for the U.S., which it is developing with
video rental store chain Blockbuster Inc.

As a first step to competing in Japan, Enron must find a Japanese affiliate
to obtain a Type 1 telecoms carrier license.


can he swing through downtown houston on his way to kingwood from tomball

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Joe Ramirez" <jramirez@othon.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Kevin; Martinez, Ernesto Jr; Mark Molnar; Wolphguy@aol.com; Frthis@aol.com; siva66@mail.ev1.net; Rs1119@aol.com; Quigley, Dutch; john_riches@msn.com; bwdunlavy@yahoo.com
Subject:	RE: Why Kingwood?

Mark is driving. Good. I need to hitch a ride on that bus also.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin [mailto:klyn@pdq.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Martinez, Ernesto Jr; Mark Molnar; Wolphguy@aol.com; Frthis@aol.com;
siva66@mail.ev1.net; Rs1119@aol.com; Dutch.Quigley@enron.com;
john_riches@msn.com; jramirez@othon.com; bwdunlavy@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Why Kingwood?

Bitching is what I do, so I will continue to bitch.  Please look us up some
sports bar near Texarkana so I can watch some NFL action after I kick your
butts at golf.  Long live the Beaver!!!  Mark, your driving right...I think
we need to leave at 4 am or so to make it to the border.

Smooches.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com>
To: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>; "'Kevin'" <klyn@pdq.net>;
<Wolphguy@aol.com>; <Frthis@aol.com>; <siva66@mail.ev1.net>;
<Rs1119@aol.com>; <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>; <john_riches@msn.com>;
<jramirez@othon.com>; <bwdunlavy@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:46 PM
Subject: Why Kingwood?

> Please read the message below (from Mark).  He asked about it, I looked it
> up and got us a tee time.  If anybody wants to get a tee time somewhere
> else, that is fine with me.  Just let me know so that I can cancel the tee
> times in Kingwood.
>
> With Richard playing and the boys from Austin playing, I think that
Kingwood
> is a happy medium.  We could try Brock park if that's what you guys want.
> Who the hell lives by Brock?  I actually think that the drive to Kingwood
is
> better than the drive into 5th ward or whatever ward it is.
>
> I don't mind making a drive to play in Austin or Beaumont or Katy.  It's
> golf!!!!
>
> The DOG!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Molnar [mailto:MarkM@cajunusa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: frthis@aol.com; wolphguy@aol.com; martier@cpchem.com;
> siva66@mail.ev1.net
> Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>
>
> I heard an add on 610 for Kingwood Cove or something.  Do you have time to
> check it out?
>
> >>> "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com> 11/07/01 02:26PM >>>
>
> No.  They have a tournament on Sunday morning.  Their first available tee
> time is 1:15.
> Damn, and I was hoping Mark would wear his Hillrod wig.
>
> Sorry, any other suggestions?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: siva66
> To: wolphguy@aol.com; martier@cpchem.com; siva66@mail.ev1.net; Mark Molnar
> Sent: 11/7/01 12:49 PM
> Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
>
> did we get tee times?
>
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 08:43:35 -0600
>
> >Ernie, can you call and get us a few tee times at the Crosby
> Country Club.  Sounds like imbreedville to me, but let's give it a
> try.
> >
> >>>> "siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net> 11/07/01 08:27AM >>>
> >that sounds good to me, everyone else agree?  we also need a head
> >count, and ernie before long you'll take your usual position
> >bringing up the rear.  once again, mark will not answer my e-
> >mails......
> >
> >
> >---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> >From: "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com>
> >Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 19:40:12 -0600
> >
> >>Sunday morning is good for me.  As much as me and my colon will
> >miss "Brock
> >>Dogs", I wouldn't mind another course.  There is a pretty nice
> >course in
> >>Crosby (Newport Country Club) which would be accomodating for
> the
> >blues man
> >>(Richard).  The shorter drive for him ensures that he doesn't
> get
> >too much
> >>ass time which in turn allows me to kick more of it later that
> >day.  Their
> >>weekend rate is $25.  They usually have an ad in the Chronicle
> >Sports
> >>section.
> >>
> >>For once in my life, all of you are looking UP to me!!!!!
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Mark Molnar [mailto:MarkM@cajunusa.com]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:28 PM
> >>To: wolphguy@aol.com; martier@cpchem.com;
> Dutch.Quigley@enron.com;
> >>ras1119@hotmail.com; siva66@mail.ev1.net; jramirez@othon.com;
> >>klyn@pdq.net; bwdunlavy@yahoo.com
> >>Subject: Re: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
> >>
> >>
> >>Sunday it is.  Let me know where ya'll want to play.  Treeline
> is
> >right by
> >>my house, but we don't have to go there.  Somewhere in a central
> >location
> >>for everyone is fine.  Throw out some names.  Early is good,
> that
> >way we can
> >>watch my fantasy football kick someone's ass.
> >>
> >>Mark Molnar
> >>Cajun Constructors, Inc.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> "Kevin" <klyn@pdq.net> 11/06/01 11:47AM >>>
> >>I thought we were all going somewhere on Sunday??? Mark???
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Joe Ramirez" <jramirez@othon.com>
> >>To: <siva66@mail.ev1.net>; <bwdunlavy@yahoo.com>;
> ><Dutch.Quigley@enron.com>;
> >><martier@cpchem.com>; <wolphguy@aol.com>; <MarkM@cajunusa.com>;
> >><ras1119@hotmail.com>; <klyn@pdq.net>
> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:09 AM
> >>Subject: RE: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
> >>
> >>
> >>> I am in. What day? What time? Where? Can we get out there
> early?
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: siva66 [mailto:siva66@mail.ev1.net]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:57 AM
> >>> To: bwdunlavy@yahoo.com; Dutch.Quigley@enron.com;
> >martier@cpchem.com;
> >>> wolphguy@aol.com; jramirez@othon.com; MarkM@cajunusa.com;
> >>> ras1119@hotmail.com; klyn@pdq.net
> >>> Subject: seeing as mark won't answer my e-mails....
> >>>
> >>> is anyone up for some golf this weekend?
> >>>
> >>> ricardo
> >>>
> >>>
> ________________________________________________________________
> >>> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >________________________________________________________________
> >Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>
>
>
>


I think I know what you're talking about.  I know you weren't asking for a
response but I can give a few quick observations based on my well highlighted
Order No. 888 and 888-A (without any review or knowledge of subsequent cases).

In Order No. 888, FERC allowed stranded costs to be directly assigned to the
departing customer either through a transmission surcharge or an exit fee.
Par. 31,036 at 31,797.  So in general, customers can't avoid paying for
stranded costs simply by bypassing.  FERC allowed utilities to file for
recovery of stranded costs for requirements contracts executed on or before
July 11, 1994, if they did not contain explicit stranded cost provisions or
provisions prohibiting stranded cost recovery.  Id. at 31,810.
There appears to be a loophole that, if applicable, would allow bypass.  For
contracts that don't contain an explicit stranded cost provision and that
allow the customer to terminate service upon notice, if the customer gives
notice that it would no longer purchase its requirements from the incumbent
utility, the FERC does not allow the utility to amend the contract to add a
stranded cost provision.  However, in that case, the utility could seek to
recover stranded costs through its rates for transmission services to the
customer provided it could rebut the presumption that it had no reasonable
expectation of continuing to serve.  Id. at note 679.  Accordingly, the
customer could avoid the stranded costs if it could bypass transmission
service.
If the loophole does not apply (because the contract does not have such a
notice provision), the customer could file a Federal Power Act Section 206
proceeding arguing that the contract is no longer just and reasonable,
wherein the customer would have the burden of proof.  But, if they do, the
incumbent utility would still have an opportunity to file for stranded cost
recovery but it must do so in that customer's Section 206 proceeding.  Order
No. 888-A, Par 31,049 at 30,400.  Likewise, if the utility has already filed
for recovery of stranded costs, the customer must make any Section 206 claim
in that case.  Id.
The FERC also decided that both FERC and the states have the authority to
address stranded costs that result when retail customers obtain retail
wheeling and that utilities are entitled to an opportunity to recover their
prudently incurred costs.  However, FERC will only entertain requests to
recover stranded costs caused by retail access if the state PUC does not have
authority to address stranded costs when the retail wheeling is required.
Order No. 888 at 31,824-25.  I don't know anything about what the individual
states have done.

I hope this helps.

To: Robert Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Stranded costs

Sarah and I will check on this because Enron did some research on it several
years ago.  However, the commercial people would like to market this possibly
to others, not simply wholesale customers.  What happens at the retail level
on stranded costs?  Thanks.

Robert Frank@ENRON
10/10/2000 01:59 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Stranded costs

This is a FERC issue because its would involve wholesale stranded costs.  Joe
and Sarah will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Order 888 provides that
if the muni (or other wholesale customer) is able to bypass the transmission
facilities of its former provider (and I believe there is dispute over what
constitutes bypass) then they may be able to avoid stranded cost liability.

	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           10/10/2000 01:15 PM

To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Stranded costs

I had a question from the commercial people about whether a muni could build
a new interconnection to another utility to avoid stranded costs of the
incumbent utility.  While the particular question happened to be in Indiana
(and I sent them to Janine), they were stating that this stranded cost
avoidance is something that they may want to tout as a benefit of building
new interconnections.

I think that we would look initially to the state restructuring law  to see
if this is specifically addressed.  However, I recall someone saying that
there may be a constitutional question as to whether an incumbent utility can
charge stranded costs to someone who leaves its system, but I don't think
this has been addressed at the appellate or Supreme Court level.  I want to
make sure that our commercial people know what is the status of the law in
this area.

I would appreciate any help on this.  Thanks.


mike
550478

jeff
550487

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/14/2001 02:07 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: apb

missing deal for jeff

buy dynegy
16-31
25 mw
215.00
np15
on peak

mike
buy sierra
16-31
25 mw
275.00
mid c
on peak


The trader VaR reports will not be distributed today due to the following
books that were not officialized on Friday.


Carolyn,

On the insurance, I would prefer that we go with set insurance requirements,
$10m in coverage (without aggregate), deductible no greater than $25,000 for
which they are responsible.  We also need a Best rating of A-XIII or better.
Also, we need a specific reference to the fact that the new member will be
responsible for the insurance required in article 19.2 of the turbine
contract.  The certificate of insurance should be a buyer deliverable at
closing.

Would it be better to address our ability to put the member interest to them
on or before [some date- maybe Dec 02], just to get it on the table?

Term- I'm thinking we may want to be indemnified for longer than 60 days
after commercial ops, as a claim could be brought against us for something
they did (and for which we should be indemnified) for longer than that, but
we would be out of luck, except to the extent insurance took care of it.
Maybe we should address reps/warranties separate from indemnities, with the
indemnities lasting longer.

I'd make the confidentiality agreement last for 2  years in this deal.

I'd broaden 9 (xii) to include the acquisition of the equipment, not just the
facility agreement.

14.  I would reformulate 14 to negotiate around the statement that the
equipment is being acquired from ENA.  I would also eliminate "or any other
third party" on the fifth line.

Defined terms:  "Commercial operations" isn't in the definitions of the
turbine contract, although there may be a definition imbedded in their
somewhere (an EECC specialty).  Please verify.

Do we intend to attach a form LLC agreement?

Thanks,

Kay


Your esteemed colleague suggested I send this to you for your review.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 07:10
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/19/2001 04:17 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Ozzie
Pagan/Enron@EnronXGate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: MDEA revised draft

Here's the latest, not-yet-final-but-getting-better agreement.

I may not have sent this to everyone who needs it, but I know Reagan will
take care of it.  Speaking of Reagan, he is generating exhibits.

Kay


Nick,

Thanks for your message. Saturday, 11:45 at  the Terman is fine with
me. See you there.

Vince

Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/01/2000 12:32:24 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: vkaminski@aol.com, lorriep@stanford.edu
Subject: Saturday Lunch

Vince,

Unfortunately, the faculty club is closed on Saturday.

>>>Lorrie, could you please make reservations
for 2 at, say, Spieto's.<<<<

I am looking forward to seeing you on Saturday. Shall
we meet at the Terman ground floor lobby at 11:45?
I think the Packard building is locked on Saturday.

Thanks,

Nick


Mark/Alan-

The drafts have gone out to Mitsui.  I will forward separately the drafts
that went out to IBJ and Sanwa.  It will be interesting to see our potential
counterparties comments.

Cheers,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000 03:46 AM -----

	John Viverito
	08/30/2000 03:02 AM

		 To: yuuji.itou@mitsuimarine.co.jp
		 cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: MITSUI MARINE ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Dear Mr. Ito,

Attached hereto, is the draft ISDA documentation, for your review.  Included
are the Schedule, the Credit Support Annex and the Enron Corp. Guaranty.

I apologize for the delay in the preparation and distribution of these
documents.

We look forward to receiving your comments.

Best regards,

John Viverito


No, not yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:24 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject:	RE: EDG and Red Cedar

Did I follow up with you verbally on this?  K.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Kim - Is there a particular person in PA I should talk to about this?  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Faucheaux, Eric
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject:	RE: EDG and Red Cedar

The work is completed and the project is closed.  The figures that I saw indicated that the project was under budget where Red Cedar might be receiving some change.  I think after a job has been closed and 180 days has passed then Property Accounting is the group responsible for handling the invoicing business that you are inquiring about.  Check with Kim Watson in this regard, she is currently working with some claim issues concerning the Calpine interconnect.  Perhaps she can direct you with the process.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - Could you please check with Earl on my Red Cedar question?  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Faucheaux, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Matthews, Ron; Gottsponer, Morgan
Subject:	RE: EDG and Red Cedar

What's your schedule on the EDG business?  I would recommend Ron, at this point.  EF

I have figures on the second part that needs to verified by Earl Chanley to be certain all costs have been submitted.  Earl has been on vacation last week and returned yesterday.  I am sure he has been getting caught up and I await his reply.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	FW: EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - What is the status of my request?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 2:21 PM
To:	Faucheaux, Eric
Subject:	EDG and Red Cedar

Eric - I am working with a company called Energy Development Group which is proposing to build power plants along TW's pipeline.  I have spent several telephone sessions with them trying to help them understand exactly where TW's line runs in certain areas of New Mexico and Arizona.  At this point in time I need some assistance from Facility Planning in order to more specifically identify the areas EDG is concerned with.  Would you please let me know who I can work with on this one?

Also, earlier this year, TW constructed a new receipt point in the La Plata station yard for Red Cedar.  Red Cedar paid TW $450,000 for the new point stating that "If the actual costs of constructing the new interconnect is less than $450,000, Red Cedar shall be entitled to a credit in the amount of the difference between $450,000 and the actual cost."  Please let me know what the actual cost of the new facilities ended up being.  Thanks.

Lorraine


I have prepared a Master gas agreement for Clinton and need to forward to
same.  Can you provided me with the name of the person to direct this
agreement to.

Thanks for your help.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Enclosed is a draft presentation of legal issues to be presented at the CPUC
emergency hearings in conjunction with regulatory and economic arguments set
forth in the draft comments previously distributed by Jeff Dasovich.  Jeff
and I will work to merge the legal issues into the full presentation,
subject to the duscussion on the conference call tomorrow morning.  This
presentation has been prepared in anticipation of the fact that we will
likely be limited to a very short verbal presentation tomorrow.  A more
extensive legal analysis of all these points is being prepared to accompany
any briefs or written comments which we are permitted to file later.  Please
e-mail comments using the reply function to MBD at this address before the
conference call if at all possible.  Thank you.  Mike Day

<<X19418.DOC>>

 - X19418.DOC


Here are my FAQ comments - all of the existing answers are still correct.


What's Bobbie's last name?

	Lucinda Kontos <lkontos@swbell.net>
	01/12/2001 10:21 AM

		 To: TANA.JONES@ENRON.COM
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Tana,
Here is Bobbie's address:
2223 Goldsmith
Houston, TX??? 77030
?
Thanks so much for doing this.?
Lucinda
?


Vince,

I am writing to ask for your help with some research I am doing with John
Lehoczky and a PhD student.  We trying to apply recent advances in Monte
Carlo for American options to value Swing and other options with multiple
early exercise decisions that are important in energy markets.  I know in
general that early exercise shows up in a wide range of energy contracts,
both real as welll as financial.  Would it be possible for you, either via
email or on the phone, to give us some examples of typical terms for such
instruments?  We would like our examples to look realistic.  We also want to
make sure we are focusing on the right sorts of optionality.

Thanks in advance,
Duane

********
Duane Seppi

Graduate School of Industrial Administration
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA  15213-3890

tel. (412) 268-2298
fax (412) 268-8896

email ds64+@andrew.cmu.edu


John:

On Tuesday, January 30, 2001, selected business units within EES will be
sharing their business and marketing plans for 2001. These plans incorporate
the lessons learned from last's year activities. The Bear Trap program was
initiated two years ago to help our Origination teams filter down the
universe of prospects to those offering the best probability of closing
deals.

This year we will have the most comprehensive Bear Trap session ever.  We
want you to be part of this exciting process and to broaden the relationship
we have with you and your teams.  Come and join me on Tuesday, January 30th,
at the Aerial Theater in Bayou Place, downtown Houston, starting at 7:00 AM
with breakfast and continuing until 5:30 PM.  If you have not RSVP'd yet,
please have your office call Julie Davidson at x- 36882 to confirm your
attendance.

See you there.

Marty Sunde


All,

Attached is the latest Roseville DASH with most of your comments incorporated.  We are hoping to finalize this by the end of the week, incorporate the final results from RAC and circulate for final approval early next week.  Please review and forward comments to both myself and Mark Fillinger by end of business tomorrow (5/3).  If you have any questions, contact either myself or Mark (415-782-7815).  Thanks.

Michael Wong
Enron North America
(w) 415-782-7808
(f) 415-782-7851


Gerald:

That was Dean Henry, not David Henry.  I'll forward it on to the right person.

Lori
---------- Original Text ----------

From: "Gerald Nemec" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>, on 6/22/00 3:36 PM:

Attached are the latest revised redlined documents for Lost Creek.   Please
note
the following:

1.  The changes include those that Chris and I discussed in Denver.  The
Capacity Allocation Agreement is redlined against the version BR had reviewed
earlier.  All other docs. are redlined against the originals.

2.  Due to the Credit Agreement structure, portions of the Natural Gas Fuel
Liquidation concept were placed into the Administrative Services Agreement.
This was done in order to allow that portion of the Natural Gas Fuel value
which
covers the Power Bill to be included in the Debt Service Coverage Ratio calcs
in
the Credit Agreement.  The remainder of the Natural Gas Fuel will be
distributed
under the Capacity Allocation Agreement to avoid the inclusive of these excess
amounts in any distribution tests under the Credit Agreement.

3.  Since more significant changes were made to the Admin. Services Agreement,
it is now being amended and restated.

Dean,  have you resolved the accounting questions you raised this past Monday?

(See attached file: Amended and Restated Admin(RED).doc)(See attached file:
AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPALLEXP AGREEMENT4RED.DOC)(See attached file: Amended
and
Restated LLC Agreement1(RED).doc)


Today, I announce my departure from Enron.  Enron is a great company and I
have enjoyed working with our terrific employees over the last eight years.
Together, we have made Enron a successful global company.

With Enron,s decreased emphasis on international asset development activity,
however, I have decided to pursue opportunities where I can make greater use
of my skills and experience.  I leave Enron with wonderful memories of our
employees and the many successes we have achieved together.  You have my best
wishes for Enron,s continued success.

Joe


My schedule has blown apart for tomorrow--traveling.  Possible to meet this
weekend to discuss the project?  Either day's fine with me.  Apologies for
the last minute change.

Best,
Jeff


The attached files contains our latest FOM July volume request.  The only
change versus the prior verision is a 10dth/day increase for BGE Choice to
305/day.

Thank you!

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - July00_FOM_Req03.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Smith L Day/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 02:00
PM ---------------------------

"Patterson, Mark" <MPatterson@ercot.com> on 04/30/2001 01:33:41 PM
To: "Day, Smith" <Smith.L.Day@enron.com>
cc: "Adams, John" <JAdams@ercot.com>
Subject: Ancillary Service Test

Enron Power Marketings Ancillary Services Test has been rescheduled for this
Thursday, May 3.? The individual test schedule is as shown.

Balancing:????? ??????? Starting?? 8:00 am
Responsive Reserve:???? Starting 11:00 am
Regulation:???? ??????? Starting??????? ? 2:00 pm
Non-Spin:?????? ??????? Starting?? 4:00 pm

ENRON Power Marketing - QSE A/S testing - Enron contact: Alan Chen -
713-853-7027

Thanks
Mark Patterson
Senior Client Representative
ERCOT
Phone# (512)-248-3912
Cell# (512)-694-1714


Alice, for the employee we discussed last week, here is information on
payee.  It doesn't look good.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 11:35
AM ---------------------------

Amanda Curless@ENRON
12/01/2000 12:01 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Conchango

Michelle,
I talked with Accounts Payable and we are sending payments to the UK. The
address is 5355 HighStreet, Egham, Great Britain. Thanks!
Mandy


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Christopher B Hunt@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/18/2000 04:32 PM
To: Richard B Sanders@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NSM Expenses

Richard -

I understand we'll be meeting next week.  I figured one of the first things
you'd be asking me for is an accounting on what Enron spent on the power
plant, so I thought I'd pre-empt you and send it in advance.

Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/17/2000 01:30 PM ---------------------------

Frank Lobdell
02/16/2000 11:11 AM
To: Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: NSM Expenses

Chris,

The attached schedule details the $1.3 million of costs incurred on the NSM
Power Plant Project.  Note that until December 1999 these costs were deferred
costs on our balance sheet.  In December, however, we wrote these costs off.

Thanks,
Frank

Christopher B Hunt
02/16/2000 06:37 AM
To: Frank  Lobdell
cc:

Subject: NSM Expenses

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Frank -

Would it be possible to get a printout of all the expenses incurred on the
NSM Power Plant AFE?  An itemized list and total would be perfect if that is
possible.  I need the list because ECT is being sued over their involvement
and one allegation would be helped if we can prove that we were very
committed to making the project work (e.g., through spending a lot of time
and money on the power plant).

I'll need this by Tuesday afternoon if possible to give to the ECT
attorneys.  Sending it by e-mail would be best so I can add a note and
forward it on.

Thanks,

Chris


Can we verified this gas flowed?  If it did it should have been billed on his term deal if there was one in place.  If the gas flowed and we did not invoice for it on term let me know and I will put it in.

Janet H Wallis
03/22/2001 04:53 PM
To:	Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	CP&L

Bob says he was not billed for a purchase he made from you at 5K  $5.16 on Feb 21st.  Will you check this out and get with
Bob A and Katherine Herrera.

JW


Gentlemen --

A busy day in India that is likely to generate substantial press.

MSEB sent us 2 letters stating that there will be no Phase II performance testing, MSEB will not pay any further amounts under the PPA and MSEB will draw no further power from Dabhol.  MSEB requested that DPC stop providing availability declarations.  These letters turn the vague "recission" letter that we received last week into a more concrete repudiation by MSEB.

On Friday, MSEB filed a 120 page petition with the Maharashtra Energy Regulatory Commission seeking relief on a number of issues.  MSEB's position seems to be that because they are no longer bound by the PPA, that the MERC is the appropriate regulatory body to regulate the MSEB/DPC relationship (e.g., determine the price for power and the amount owed by DPC on the misdeclaration claim).  The MERC ruled today that it likely has jurisdiction in this matter and granted some interim relief to MSEB (including stopping any arbitration proceedings by DPC against MSEB).  We are preparing a petition tor the Bombay High Court to overturn the MERC's actions.

The Government of India continues to state publicly that it will not buy power from Dabhol.  Accordingly, we have existing counterparties (MSEB and GOM) that do not want Dabhol's power and are not creditworthy and no reasonable hope at present to find other viable counterparties.

Bruce


Dear Vince,

I have attached the invoice for the workshop that Beth O'Sullivan and I
conducted for your group last month as well as a summary of the workshop
evaluation.  I am sorry for the delay, but we were waiting to receive more
of the workshop evaluations so that we could provide you a more complete
assessment of the workshop by the attendees.  As it is, we only collected
11 responses of the 17 attendees.

I will also send you a copy of this invoice in the mail and will be glad to
send you the actual evaluation forms completed by the attendees if you
would like to have them.

As mentioned in the attached, we enjoyed working with your group and hope
that you can see the difference the training made in the presentation
ability of the attendees.

If you have any questions about the attached invoice, please do not
hesitate to call me at 713-348-5394.

Again, thanks for bringing us in to conduct the workshop.  I sincerely hope
that you are well despite any changes taking place around you and that you
have a great Thanksgiving holiday.

Sincerely,

Deborah

Deborah J. Barrett, Ph.D.
Instructor/Director of MBA Communications
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005-1892

Phone:  713.348.5394
Fax:      713.348-5251
E-mail:  barrett@rice.edu

 - Enron Presentation Training Invoice.doc
 - Enron Eval Results Final Sum.doc


___________________________________________________________
You received this e-mail because you registered on the
E*TRADE Web site, or on one of our partners' sites. If you
do not want to receive our partner e-mail offers, or any
E*TRADE marketing e-mail, you can change your preferences
now at: http://e-trade.0mm.com/ETR071010+sshackl@ect.enron.com
You are subscribed at: sshackl@ect.enron.com
___________________________________________________________

E*TRADE(R) Partner Offers
Special Offers for E*TRADE Customers and Members

Dear SARAH:

How would you spend a $20,000 E*TRADE brokerage account?

Perhaps you would explore new investment opportunities, or take an
exotic vacation, or start your kid's college savings fund.  The
possibilities are limitless...but the deadline for entry is midnight,
November 29, 2000.

It takes less than a minute to enter, at
http://e-trade.0mm.com/ETR071011+C

____________________________________________________________

One sweepstakes winner will receive a $20,000 E*TRADE
brokerage account, or, if the winner is ineligible for an
E*TRADE brokerage account, $20,000 in cash. For complete
contest rules, click here:
http://e-trade.0mm.com/ETR071014+C

Copyright(C) 2000 E*TRADE Securities, Inc. All rights reserved.
Member NASD/SIPC. E*TRADE and the E*TRADE logo are trademarks or
registered trademarks of E*TRADE Securities, Inc. All other
trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their
respective owners.

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, E*TRADE is not
responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or
guarantees about the products or services advertised. E*TRADE takes
your privacy seriously. To learn more about E*TRADE's use of
personal information, please read our Privacy Policy at:
http://e-trade.0mm.com/ETR071012+C
If you do not want to receive further mailings from E*TRADE,
you can unsubscribe now at:
http://e-trade.0mm.com/ETR071013+sshackl@ect.enron.com

 - att1.htm


EB3127 - Edith Cross (Service Deal)


Vince,

here is John's resume and a cover letter.
I have read the resume, and it looks impressive.
Let me know what you think.

Jason

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"John E. McKinley" <john_e_mckinley@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22John+20E+2E+20McKinley+22+20+3Cjohn+5Fe+5Fmckinley+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Sokolov, Jason
Cc:	john_e_mckinley@hotmail.com
Subject:	Resume - John E. Mc Kinley

Jason,

I enjoyed meeting you and Connie at Kate's loft gathering this weekend and very much appreciate the assistance.

Attached please find my resume and cover letter .  As I had mentioned, I am pursuing an opportunity in maintenance/operations in the cogeneration or power generation industry here in Houston.  My cover letter outlines my interests and abilities in greater detail.

If there's anything I can do for you, please ask.

Thank you,
John
(713)-237-0634

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - RESUME JOHN E. MCKINLEY 6.03.01.doc
 - COVER LETTER ENRON JASON SOKOLOV.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 11:37
AM ---------------------------

TJ Butler
03/14/2001 11:36 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: kayak

Yes, I do still have it.  It is located close to the Southwest Freeway(59
South) and Weslayan.

tjb
x54698


Kaye:  did you handle?   Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/28/99 10:15
AM ---------------------------

Information Risk Management
11/23/99 05:26 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SRRS - Close your status

This is a reminder that the incomplete SRRS requests you created and saved,
tagged as 'New' under the SRRS process,  will be deleted on Friday 11/30/99.
 Please 'Submit' your  existing incomplete requests by 11/30/99 if you feel
your requests need to be formally submitted and completed.
 Incomplete or 'New' SRRS requests that are older than one (1) week (starting
12/1/99) will be deleted as part of our policy and procedures.

Thank you for your cooperation,
Information Risk Management

For more information on your particular incomplete request click on link
below.


Is this still outstanding?  Craig is back in the office now.

D

Julie Meyers
03/20/2000 02:27 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mitchell Gas Services 2/00

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 02:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/20/2000 02:08 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William C Falbaum/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mitchell Gas Services 2/00

We have a price difference with Mitchell Gas Services for 2/00 production,
deal 156658.  We have HSC -0.05 and Mitchell shows HSC - 0.04.  Can you tell
me what the correct price is?  I need this ASAP.

Megan


That will be fine.  SS

Taffy Milligan
04/13/2000 11:28 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Sr. Legal Specialist Candidate - Patricia Slaughter

Sara,
I just found out that Mark will be here next week, so I will need to included
him in  the interview schedule.  Since you are familiar with Patricia would
you mind doubling-up with Carol?  If  that is ok with you,  I will schedule
Mark for the 3:45 pm slot.

tm

----------------- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000 11:22 AM
---------------------------

Taffy Milligan
04/12/2000 02:05 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie
Heard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sr. Legal Specialist Candidate - Patricia Slaughter

It appears that the following interview schedule may work.  Please advise
ASAP if you have a conflict.

 Wed, April 19,  2000 in EB38c1.
 2:30 p.m.  Sr. Legal Specialists (S. Bailey, S. Flynn, T. Jones)
 3:15 p.m. Carol St. Clair
 3:45 p.m. Sara Shackleton

tm

P.S.   Tana & Susan B., I updated your calendars.


To contribute our personal best at ENRON, our conduct must promote respectful
and co-operative work relationships. Workplace harassment conflicts with
ENRON's vision and values and violates Company policy.  Harassment also can
violate federal and state laws.  By understanding what harassment is and its
potential harm, we can prevent it in our workplace.

We are pleased to announce that all employees of EWS and EES will receive
harassment prevention training soon.  This training is mandatory for all
ENRON employees.

During this training you will:

 Be able to recognize harassment
 Learn to take precautions against being harassed
 Learn to avoid being considered a harasser
 Know how to address a situation involving harassment
 Learn how harassment prevention is consistent with ENRON values

Please click here (  )  to sign up for the session of your choice.    If you
have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.

The dates and times available for the sessions are:

 Tuesday, Feb 20; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15; 4:30 - 6:00
 Friday, Feb 23; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15
  Monday Mar 5; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15; 4:30 - 6:00

All training sessions will be held in the LaSalle Room at the DoubleTree
Hotel.


At Gary Fergus' request, please see attached document.

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - scanned_.pdf


Monday, April 9, 2001 6pm -10pm
The Warwick Hotel
5791 Main Street, Houtson

Many thanks!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Yes, Mary is still in 3807.  Is the printer you mentioned the
smallest/cheapest one we can get?


Casey,

Can you remind me of all this?

Thanks,
Stacey

John,

Good questions, when I figure it out I will add to the Month End Procedures.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: Power Month End Procedures

Just as confirmation, is the last pwrdpr for the month dated as the last business day or the day of the calculation? Also, do we export for the last business day or the effective date?

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Reeves, Kathy; Dusek, Ryan; Loibl, Kori; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Casimir, Reno; Kelly, William; Keiser, Kam; Carter, Tim; Chapman, Tom; Chen, Hai; Dahlke, Andrea; Estrada, Israel; Evans, Casey; Franklin, Warrick; Lewis,  Jon Paul; Mattox, Michael; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Chang, Fran; Dunton, Heather; Law, Samantha; Postlethwaite, John; Warner, Nicholas
Cc:	Lee, Norman; Yang, Zhiyun; Glover, Sheila; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hedstrom, Peggy
Subject:	Power Month End Procedures

In order to have consistency among all power calculations, please follow the procedures outlined below.  Please feel free to forward this e-mail to anyone I may have missed.

Power Month End Calculation Procedures

?	At each month end the officialized power calculations are dated effective the last day of the month, even when that day is a weekend.
?	Power curves are populated as of the business day the calculation is performed and the effective date of the calculation.  For example, curves were produced for both Friday, September 28, 2001 (the day the calculation was performed) and Sunday, September 30, 2001 (the effective date of the calculation).
?	RisktRAC IT rolls the results of our calculation back to the last business day in order for the information to map to the business day's date.

This procedure is followed because power trading is on a daily liquidation timetable.  The calculation engine is instructed to liquidate based on the effective dates of the calculation.

Below is an example of the PortCalc screen as set up for a calculation at month end where the month end is on a weekend.
	Choose Non-exact Libor Based Curve so that the calculation engine will pick up the last business day's interest rate curve.

	Choose the Valuation Date as the last day of the month.

Choose the Prior Val Date as the last time you ran a calculation (normal procedures).

In addition, if you are the owner of the power curves, you must contact PortCalc IT to copy the curves as of the last business day over to a file dated the last day of the month.

 << OLE Object: Paintbrush Picture >>


Here is the model Teco sent us that we revised to add some of ENA's
assumptions.

Ben
3-7998


Mary Cook requested certain updates be made to ENA's Guaranty documents.  Attached are REDLINED versions of the Guaranty documents.

	1.  Enron Corp. Guaranty & Counterparty Guaranty

	2.  Enron Corp. Guaranty (multiproduct)

	3.  Counterparty Guaranty (multiproduct)

Clean versions of these Guaranty documents are a available for use and can be accessed as follows:

		O:\Legal\ATTY.FMS\SWAP FORMS\Current

Regards,
Susan S. Bailey
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
phone: (713) 853-4737
fax: (713) 646-3490
email: susan.bailey@ enron.com


Tana,

Thanks for the update!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:55 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement: Deutsche

The wheels of DeutscheBank turn very slowly.  It appears their Credit guy
didn't communicate our agreement regarding Specified Entities to his legal
team, so Sara Shackleton said they are confirming that information before
they send a revised draft.  Further, he said all changes have to be sent to
Germany first for approval, so now we need to wait on Germany...!

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:     Tana.Jones@enron.com

                                             cc:
Sara.Shackleton@enron.com, richard.sage@enron.com
                    12/05/2000 08:41         Subject:     RE: ISDA Master
Agreement: Deutsche
                    AM

Many thanks,

Clare

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:37 PM
To: Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com
Cc: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Master Agreement: Deutsche

We do have a Credit Support Annex in place.  Once we sign the ENA
agreement, we will make your requests to DB.

                    Clare.Godson@Alle

                    nOvery.com               To:
richard.sage@enron.com,
tana.jones@enron.com
                                             cc:
James.Clarry@AllenOvery.com
                    12/05/2000 06:08         Subject:     RE: ISDA Master
Agreement: Deutsche
                    AM

Tana,

Thanks for keeping us updated on the Deutsche negotiations.  If, as you
suggest, Deutsche can prepare a Master for the EnronCredit.com Limited
Master as the docs are on their system then this would be useful, and I
will
review and comment on those.  The one thing they will need to ensure as you
mentioned is that the Master Agreement is governed by English law.  In
addition, I  am not sure if you have put a CSA in place with Deutsche, but
if you have (presumably a Paragraph 13 under the NY law CSA?) we would need
the corresponding Paragraph 11 to the English Law CSA.

Many thanks again and we look forward to progressing this matter.

Kind regards,

Clare

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Sent:   Friday, December 01, 2000 10:30 AM
> To:     Godson, Clare:ICM (LN)
> Subject:     FW: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Richard.Sage@enron.com@ALLEN & OVERY
> Sent:   Friday, December 01, 2000 10:25 AM
> To:     Clarry, James:ICM (LN)
> Subject:     Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
> FYI
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000
> 10:27 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 30/11/2000 17:00 CST
>
> To:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreement: Deustche  (Document link: Richard
>       Sage)
>
> FYI,
>
> Bill Bradford in Credit had a conference call today with the Deutsche
Bank
> Credit person and I think we have come to agreement on not adding any
> specified entities to the ISDA Master Agreement.  He also discussed
> proposed credit limits for the three other Deutsche Bank masters we want
> to
> get in place (including EnronCredit.com).  I think we are done now and
> hope
> to get execution documents from them, since the documents are on their
> system.  Our intention is to then get Deutsche Bank to turn around 3 like
> masters, making any changes necessitated by change of law, and otherwise
> turn around the remaining masters quickly.  I'll keep you posted.
>
>
>
>                     Richard Sage
>                                          To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                     11/30/2000           cc:
>                     10:52 AM             Subject:     Re: ISDA Master
> Agreement: Deustche
>
>
>
>
>
> If you do add all the entities, does that mean that we would not need to
> put in place a separate agreement for ECCL?
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 30/11/2000
> 16:53 ---------------------------
>
> From: Tana Jones on 27/11/2000 15:45 CST
>
> To:   Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
> cc:   Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
>
> Subject:  Re: ISDA Master Agreements  (Document link: Richard Sage)
>
> With respect to Deutsche Bank (""DB"), we have one credit issue
remaining,
> DB would like us to add all the Enron trading entities DB trades with as
> Specified Entities under the ISDA Master Agreement and we are somewhat
> hesitant to do so, as this could potentially roll up swaps under
> structured
> loan transactions into a default under the ISDA Agreement.  Sara and Bill
> Bradford in Credit are supposed to talk to the DB Credit people about
this
> remaining issue.
>
> With respect to First Union National Bank, the draft we were working from
> was so old that they agreed to look at our current form of agreement
which
> was sent to them on 11/8/00 for review.  Sara is working on that with
> Susan
> Bailey, another paralegal in our Group.
>
>
>
>                     Denis
>                     O'Connell            To:     Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
>                                          cc:     Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
>                     11/22/2000           Subject:     ISDA Master
> Agreements
>                     06:05 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Tana - can you please give me an update on where you are in the
> negotiations of the ISDA with the following counterparties and confirm
> which Enron entity you are negotiating on behalf of.
>
> Tks,
>
> Denis
>
>
> First Union National Bank
>
> Deutsched Bank AG
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  - att1.eml <<
> File: att1.eml >>

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20)
7330 3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not
copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other
person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of
partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the
above office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign
lawyers.

======================================================================


When: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:30 AM-12:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Hey, I need to re-schedule.  I am a co-chair for the Enron Kids Committee and we have a meeting over lunch on this same day.

sorry-
kh


Jeff and Larry:  Last year, Mary Gosnell prepared a one page summary which
was used by legal and credit to target the preparation of ISDA Master
Agreements.  The summary was divided into two parts:  "Without Master
Agreements" and "With ECT Master Agreements" and included the number of
trades for the first half of the year.  It is our objective once again to put
new agreements into place and upgrade existing ECT Master Agreements to ISDA
Master Agreements.  I don't know if EOL trades have impacted the numbers this
year and I'm not sure whether we need to create a line item for EOL (I'll
leave that to your discretion).  Please let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks.  Sara

P.S.  We were very successful in negotiating masters appearing on Mary's
list!


Jeff -

As we discussed today, the following is the TRV (Trader Report Viewer)
project status:

?  TRV is targeted to be implemented by May 15th as scheduled.
?  TRV development and security setup has been completed and is ready to be
presented to the traders.
?  Hal and I will meet with Phillip and Kam tomorrow to provide the TRV
system and administrator rights review, and to publish  their region's
reports.
?  We will then meet with Darron, David, and Errol (to be scheduled for early
next week) to provide the TRV system and  administrator rights review, and to
publish their region's reports.
?   At the conclusion of the review, we will determine we will roll out the
training for the remaining team members within each  region (i.e. Region
Leads or IT to provide training to the team members).
?  Currently TRV is running in the development environment for the review
period.  Upon conclusion of the review period, we will  ask for approval and
UAT signoff from you in order to transition the system into the Production
environment.

Again, thank you and each of your team members for everyone's help and
support on this initiative!  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Shirley McDowell
TRV Project / IT Project Manager


That little project has been killed.  I don't think Father needs another
animal to take care of.

"Germany Jr, Don (WD)" <WDGERMANYJR@dow.com> on 05/12/2000 09:20:56 AM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Photo's

yo
de
man  Barbra said something to me about buying a donkey!  Are you aware of
this??

dg

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 9:09 AM
To: Germany Jr, Don (WD)
Subject: RE: Photo's

I send it to your work address tonight buddy.

You de Man.

"Germany Jr, Don (WD)" <WDGERMANYJR@dow.com> on 05/11/2000 08:48:21 AM

To:   "'Chris Germany'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Photo's

Are you going to send the pictures to me.  I ran an add on the tractor in
next weeks local bargains paper.  I priced it at $19,000.  Am loading
exchangers this a.m.  Gotts to Go!

dg

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Germany [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 8:09 AM
To: wdgermanyjr@dow.com; germanj@basf-corp.com
Subject: Photo's

I believe Kodak just doesn't support the USB connection very well.  I tried
the
other connection and it works great.  I pulled all the tractor pictures off
the
camera with no problem.  I still have not seen a photo as clear as the very
first one Chance pulled up of the family reunion though.

All the tractor pictures are a little fuzzy.


ATTENDEES:

Louise Kitchen
Mark Taylor
Bill Bradford
Bill Glass - UBS
Lisa Felt - UBS
Gary Riddell - UBS


Hi everyone,

Here is a new ISDA request for USG Corp. If you have any questions, please
feel free to call.

Regards,

Brad


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 2,949.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 24,764.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 778,397.
1/17/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 179,421.
1/17/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 707,236.


Don,
I got your message form Bobbette regarding pricing for our hourly indexes. I
know you guys are busy during the day so if you get a chance please give me
a call so we can discuss subscriptions and when we are going to do HAPPY
HOUR.  You can reach me at 713-647-8802.

Regards,
Jeff Maack
713-647-8802


---------------------- Forwarded by Hector Campos/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 09:41
AM ---------------------------

Emilio Ayanz <EmilioA@arcassociates.com> on 11/15/2000 06:42:15 AM
To: "'Hala'" <hala.tayyarah@enron.com>, "'Tom'" <tbremond@enron.com>,
"'Adam'" <Adam.Borgatti@NBFinancial.com>, "'Hector'"
<hector.campos@enron.com>, "'Montgomery Jarrett'" <montgomery@jarrett.net>
cc:
Subject: FW: REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Spratt
Sent: 15 November 2000 12:38
To: Emilio Ayanz; Paul Morgan; Claudio Lohmann
Subject: FW: REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

-----Original Message-----
From: Parker, Chris [mailto:chris.parker@nomura.co.uk]
<mailto:[mailto:chris.parker@nomura.co.uk]>
Sent: 15 November 2000 12:37
To: 'Chris Wright'; 'Graeme Summers'; 'Henry Spratt'; 'Joe Wicks'; 'Lee
 Bostock'; 'Matt Osborne'; 'Mike Morrison'; 'Mikey'; 'Shergar'; 'Tom
 Brand'; 'Stuart Mills'
Subject: FW: REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

FOR THOSE OF YOU WORKING FOR US COMPANIES!!
 > -----NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE
 > To the citizens of the United States of America,
 > In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and
thus
 > to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of
your
 > independence, effective today.
 >
 > Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchial
duties
 > over all states, commonwealths and other territories.  Except
Utah,
 > which she does not fancy.  Your new prime minister (The rt. hon.
Tony
 > Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware
that
 > there is a world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for

 > America without the need for further elections.  Congress and the
 > Senate will be disbanded.  A questionnaire will be circulated next
year
 > to determine whether any of you noticed.
 >
 > To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the
following
 > rules are introduced with immediate effect:
 >
 > 1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English
Dictionary.
 > Then look up "aluminium".  Check the pronunciation guide.  You
will be
 > amazed at just how wrongly you have been pronouncing it.
Generally,
 > you should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels.  Look up
 > "vocabulary".  Using the same twenty seven words interspersed with

 > filler noises such as "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and

 > inefficient form of communication.  Look up "interspersed".
 >
 > 2. There is no such thing as "US English".  We will let Microsoft
know
 > on your behalf.
 >
 > 3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian
accents. It
 > really isn't that hard.
 >
 > 4.      Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English
actors as
 > the good  guys.
 >
 > 5.      You should relearn your original national anthem, "God
Save The
 > Queen", but only after fully carrying out task 1.  We would not
want you
 > to get confused and give up half way through.
 >
 > 6.      You should stop playing American "football".  There is
only
 > one kind of football.  What you refer to as American "football" is
not
 > a very good game. The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a
world
 > outside your borders may have noticed that no one else plays
"American"
 > football. You will no longer be allowed to play it, and should
instead
 > play proper football. Initially, it would be best if you played
with
 > the girls.  It is a difficult game.  Those of you brave enough
will, in
 > time, be allowed to play rugby (which is similar to American
 > "football", but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty
 > seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like nancies).  We are
 > hoping to get together at least a US rugby sevens side by 2005.
 >
 > 7.      You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear

 > weapons if they give you any merde.  The 98.85% of you who were
not
 > aware that there is a world outside your borders should count
yourselves
 > lucky.  The Russians have never been the bad guys.  "Merde" is
French for
 > "shit".
 >
 > 8.      July 4th is no longer a public holiday.  November 8th will
be a
 > new national holiday, but only in England.  It will be called
"Indecisive
 > Day".
 >
 > 9.      All American cars are hereby banned.  They are crap and it
is for
 > your own good.  When we show you German cars, you will understand
what we
 > mean.
 >
 > 10.     Please tell us who killed JFK.  It's been driving us
crazy.
 >
 >  Thank you for your cooperation.
 >
  > >
 >

PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email you must not copy, distribute or take any further
action in reliance on it and you should delete it and notify the sender
immediately. Email is not a secure method of communication and Nomura
International plc cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or
completeness of this message or any attachment(s).  Please check this e-mail
for virus infection, for which Nomura International plc accepts no
responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please request
a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not represent those of Nomura
International plc. This email is intended for informational purposes only
and is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell securities or related
financial instruments. Nomura International plc is regulated by the
Securities and Futures Authority Limited and is a member of the London Stock
Exchange.


Yes.  That would be good.  However, John and I have spoken and Dick Jenkins and I have spoken.  I have confirmation from both of these traders that the mechanism for the recall was to purchase the gas back at an agreed price, different from the sell price (creating multiple back-to-backs with Colonial).  Therefore, the way these items sit in our system seems correct.  Furthermore, I have left a message with Colonial's accountant (Fri May 11) on this stating our position and that they needed to work internally to determine if there should be a conversation between our marketers and their marketers.

I think it might be useful for you, Meredith, and I to sit down and talk about specific paths for these items, especially Dec/00.  At the very least that would help me put my ducks in a row when I am talking to Colonial about collection on Dec/00.  Under our current position Colonial owes us for Dec-00.  Wednesday is good for me.

Thanks.

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Cynthia Franklin                           05/15/2001 05:57 AM

To:	Scott Dozier/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Colonial Outstanding AR

Scott,
Meredith Homco and I both were working on Tetco during the December 00 and March 01. Meredith mentioned to me that she had gone over some items regarding this issue previously with someone is settlements.  I'd like for us to get with her and see if we can't get this resolved faster with her involvement. I'm out of the office today at an off site customer meeting but could be available tomorrow.  Meredith -- what does your schedule look like Wednesday afternoon? Can you save 10-20 minutes for me and Scott. Please let me know you availability.

Cindy

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Scott Dozier                           05/11/2001 11:00 AM

To:	John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Re: Colonial Outstanding AR

John - Apologies for the long note below but I believe it will be useful to get into the detail to resolve our Colonial recall issues.

Below is some detail on Colonial discrepancies involved with recallable deals in Dec-00 and Mar-01.  Please advise as to what the next course of action should be to clear this up.  I would be happy to meet with any one involved to clarify any issues or questions.

Overview:  I am still unclear as to what recallable means.  It sounds from your note below and everything that Cindy has told me, that by recall you simply mean a buy back or back-to-back as it resides within our system.  However, Colonial is not billing or settling it that way.  They are wanting to collect on their sale for these items while considering our sales for these as never having flowed.  Unless, I am missing something from your conversations with Colonial their may be a disconnect with them.

Note, the first section attached is fairly straight forward.   All recall sales being disputed by Colonial involve direct back-to-back sales with Colonial.  As for deal #658124, I see no problems between Sitara and Unify; Colonial is questioning only 4,500 on day 8 and no other gas on deal 336733.  In fact, Unify will not allow an imbalance on all back-to-back or brokered deals.

Section two shows the items that Colonial has claimed as recalled in Dec-00.  They have yet to give me days so I can not break out the items from our market to our sales to Colonial.  But, they all involve back-to-backs.

Section three shows other TETC items in dispute.  I listed these simply because I consider it possible that these may be involved in the recall items in question.

Thank you - Scott Dozier
5-7213

John Hodge
05/09/2001 05:14 PM
To:	Scott Dozier/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Colonial Outstanding AR

According to Dick's notes from the deal ticket, we recalled the gas on 12/7/00, 12/28-31/00, 3/8/01, 3/22/01 and 3/24-26/01.  In talking with Cindy, it appears that at least two tickets were put into Sitara.  One ticket was our sale to Colonial and another ticket has us buying back from Colonial.  Sitara # 658124 is the ticket covering the buyback for March 2001.  Looking at the ticket in Sitara, there is an inconsistency between the Sitara volumes and the Unify bridged volumes.  Cindy, have you had a chance to check into this?

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Scott Dozier                           05/09/2001 04:46 PM

To:	Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Colonial Outstanding AR

Dick or John,

Any word on the outstanding TETC items that were orginally thought to be recallable with Colonial?

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
5-7213

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


and i was going to lose sleep tonight...

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/10/2001 02:56 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: McCuistion Program

No problem.  Worry not.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Team Leader Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		3/27/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Del Kreiser
1111 30th St
Boulder, CO 80303
delas@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Del Kreiser