I like that area. Nice and quiet. 6 blocks to Original Joe's. Didn't have the carrot cake but the soup was excellent.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:32 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Nice, did you have the carrot cake? Sept 15th, hmm I'll put my party dress
on.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:32 AM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

I had lunch at bell's cafe yesterday. They are the red brick townhouses on
14a st. Moving back Sept. 15.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:25 AM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   Are those the townhouses near bells cafe, behind the tropicana?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:02 AM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   Hey there neighbor. Bought a house this weekend #401 3511 14a st. That
   is
   pretty close to you place isn't it. You'll have to drive by and check it
   out.

   Chris

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:59 PM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:  RE:

      Oh well, more fish in the sea, Oh well.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:47 PM
      To: RLaird@natsource.ca
      Subject: RE:

      I just heard from a mutual friend that Kerrie Murray got engaged
      recently.
      Scratch that one off the list of possibles.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
         Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:03 PM
         To:     Dorland, Chris
         Subject:  RE:

         Funny that's what I was thinking...

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM
         To: RLaird@natsource.ca
         Subject: RE:

         I was thinking of converting it to a hover vehicle. I might just
   sell
         the
         car and get you to drive me around all winter.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
            Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:02 PM
            To:     Dorland, Chris
            Subject:  RE:

            How about skidoo skis for the front and tracks for the back..

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:00 AM
            To: RLaird@natsource.ca
            Subject: RE:

            Lexus IS 300. Not sure if I am going to buy 17" or 16" wheels
   for
      the
            winter. Jackass.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
               Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:54 AM
               To:     Dorland, Chris
               Subject:  RE:

               Not sure about the wheels, I believe he sells some recycled
      from
         used
               furnaces...I'll check on the tires, what's it for, model
   etc,
      do
         you
               have
               tire size?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
   [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
               Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:52 AM
               To: RLaird@natsource.ca
               Subject: RE:

               If you are bored try to find out what your tire guy thinks
   of
         Dunlop
               Winter
               Sport M2 tires. Is you tire guy also a wheel guy? I need
   some
         winter
               wheels
               as well.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:43 AM
                  To:     Dorland, Chris
                  Subject:  RE:

                  Keep out of that fat category, that's all mine.....

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
      [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:43 AM
                  To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                  Subject: RE:

                  I was confused by your use of 2 spellings. Did you like
   my
         Austin
                  Power's
                  reference? "I know. That's how we do it in Belgium. It's
      called
         a
                  Belgium
                  dip" You are back in my good graces. Try not to confuse
   the
         dumb
            fat
                  kid.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                     Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:37 AM
                     To:     Dorland, Chris
                     Subject:  RE:

                     Wasn't questioning the chica's, like the term,
   thinking
      out
            loud
               as
                  to
                     any
                     available on the scene for the kid....

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
         [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                     Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:34 AM
                     To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                     Subject: RE:

                     Fuck you. That's how we spell it in Belgium.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                        Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:29 AM
                        To:     Dorland, Chris
                        Subject:  RE:

                        With open arms...Chica's? I was at a wedding this
      weekend
            with
                  tons
                     of
                        chika's it was ridiculous....

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com
            [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
                        Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:27 AM
                        To: RLaird@natsource.ca
                        Subject: RE:

                        Coming to town Thursday for the weekend and
   hopefully
         moving
            by
                  the
                        middle
                        of September. Spending Friday house shopping. I
   think
      I
         am
               going
                  to
                     end
                        up
                        in your neck of the woods. Seems like the best
   values
      are
         in
               that
                     area.
                        Are
                        we going to get some snow this winter? We need to
   find
            Dorland
               a
                     date. I
                        am
                        going to a wedding this weekend and there should be
      lots
         of
               single
                        chicas
                        there. I am really looking forward to being back in
      Cow
            town.
                  Houston
                     is
                        painfull.

                        Later

                        cd

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
                           Sent:   Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:12 AM
                           To:     Dorland, Chris
                           Subject:

                           Sucka, when you coming to towne?

   **********************************************************************
                        This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
   its
            relevant
                     affiliate
                        and
                        may contain confidential and privileged material
   for
      the
            sole
               use
                  of
                     the
                        intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
   distribution
      or
                  disclosure
                     by
                        others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
         intended
                  recipient
                     (or
                        authorized to receive for the recipient), please
      contact
         the
                  sender
                     or
                        reply
                        to Enron Corp. at
         enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
            and
                  delete
                        all
                        copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
      attachments
            hereto)
                  are
                     not
                        intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do
   not
         create
            or
                     evidence
                        a
                        binding and enforceable contract between Enron
   Corp.
      (or
         any
            of
                  its
                        affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
         party,
            and
               may
                     not
                        be
                        relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
         estoppel
            or
                     otherwise.
                        Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Dave would like to have a strategy meeting next Tuesday  Ocotober 10, 2000
from 2:30-4:30 in room 30C1. No preparation is necessary and it's important
that each of you plan to attend. If you cannot attend, please contact Dave
directly.

Thanks!


I do not suck at writing e-mails. You just can't appreciate the sense of
humor one develops in my line of work. It's borderline madness. I should be
home all night but do call first  in case I'm outside working in the garden.


-----Original Message-----
From: Manuel, Erica [mailto:Erica.Manuel@edelman.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:43 PM
To: Allen, Stevan; arem@electric.com; Bob_Anderson@apses.com;
brbarkovich@earthlink.net; Britton McFetridge; cra@calretailers.com;
Dave Modisette; dennis.flatt@kp.org; dhunter@s-k-w.com; Dian Grueneich;
djsmith@s-k-w.com; Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com; drothrock@cmta.net;
Erin O'Keefe; Fairchild, Tracy; gdoar@newpower.com;
gharrison@calstate.edu; hgovenar@govadv.com;
jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com; James Simonelli; Janie Mollon;
jerryl@abag.ca.gov; .gov@mailman.enron.com;
johnlatimer@capitoladvocacy.com; Julee Ball; ken_pietrelli@ocli.com;
kgough@calpine.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com; kmills@cfbf.com;
lhastings@cagrocers.com; Manuel, Erica; Margaret Catzen; mday@gmssr.com;
mmoretti@calhealth.org; nplotkin@rcsis.com; Paul Bauer;
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com; richard.seguin@kp.org; RochmanM@spurr.org;
Roger Berliner; rrichter@calhealth.org; sgovenar@govadv.com;
smccubbi@enron.com; spahnn@hnks.com; sschleimer@calpine.com;
vincent.stewart@ucop.edu; vjw@ceert.org; Warner, Jami;
wbooth@booth-law.com; wbrown@lhom.com; wlarson@calstate.edu
Subject: Final DAC Letter

Direct Access Coalition Members:

The following letter was hand delivered to Treasurer Angelides, the
Governor, all CPUC commissioners, Tim Gage, Tom Hannigan and all Senate and
Assembly Energy committee members. These people also received a fax copy as
did the entire legislature. EM.

 <<DAC Letter to Angelides-PUC.doc>>


You can set up your own photo album online.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 04:33
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/11/2000 07:23 AM
To: Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Steve Photo's

I have Steve and Lisa on the internet at this web address

http://www.cartogra.com/home/home.asp

Enter the account name "trogg522" in the box on the bottom right.


<title>Kiwi Bingo - Bingo Bid!</title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

			December 15, 2001

Earn 250 Points when you click below & an additional 5,000 Points when you make a deposit and play now!

See Kiwi Bingo website for terms and conditions - www.kiwibingo.com

 Sweepsclub.com e-mail promotions are sent as a service to its members.  If
you feel you have received this e-mail in error and wish to unsubscribe from
Sweepsclub's e-mail list, please click the link below:
http://www.sweepsclub.com/update_profile/removeEmail.cfm.


Angela:  What did we decide to do with these two masters?  Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maureen.Ryan@chase.com@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Merger Letter

Sara,

Further to my voicemail message of this afternoon, attached is the "merger
letter".  As it happens, both Chase and Morgan had ISDA agreements in
place.  The letter selects the Chase agreement (which, as you know, we
amended earlier this week), as the preferred agreement, and terminates the
Morgan agreement.

Please review and call me (212-270-2673) if you have any questions.  If the
letter is acceptable, please call me and I'll arrange for execution copies
to be sent to your attention.

Thankyou again for you help.

Maureen.

(See attached file: Enron merger letter.DOC)
 - Enron merger letter.DOC


Can someone call me at x33399.  I'm in the middle of doing these again and it
won't let me submit the form.

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	03/20/2001 01:08 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: eRequests

Good afternoon Ms. Jones,

No request were found for Angela Davis, Linda Sietzema and Sharon Crawford;
if you have the request numbers, please provide them (sometimes eRequest will
not find the client by name).  The request for Marcus Nettelton appears OK.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 03/20/2001 10:32 AM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests

I just did a request to get Angela Davis in the Houston Office and Linda
Sietzema and Sharon Crawford in the Calgary offices edit access to the
Financial Trading Agreement Database.  I also requested that Marcus Nettelton
get edit access to the ENA Legal Online Trading Database.  I'm not sure if I
did the "erequest" all ok.  Can you check to make sure your got all four?
Thanks!

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	02/27/2001 01:12 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: eRequests 20721 & 20740

Good afternoon,

Please submit an eRequest for the access request (all 5-7 people can be
placed on one request).

To view the Group members, please open the ECT Address book, click on Groups,
then double-click on the name of the group.  Please let us know if there are
any questions.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 02/27/2001 11:31 AM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests 20721 & 20740

ECT HOU_LN1/ECT
Legal\new_swp.nsf

I will be having about 5-7 other people that I will need added to this
database.  Should I send these requests back directly to you, or do them
through the system as well?

Also, there are two ways of getting edit access through this database.  One
is for employees of Legal, who can then enter Legal comments, and the other
is for employees of Credit, who can then enter Credit comments.  Do you see
that choice?  Is there some way for me to verify which employees of Legal and
which employees of Credit have what access?  I know that some employees of
Credit have Legal access by mistake.  Can I get lists of the Legal and Credit
breakdowns?

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	02/27/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: eRequests 20721 & 20740

Good morning,

Please provide the path to the Financial Trading Agreement database.  The
information can be found by right-clicking on the database icon, then
selecting Database properties.  The Server and File name will be under the
Basic tab.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Security


I'm comng to town on Sat urday night  Feb 3 (Sat) and  leaving Feb 5th
(mon).  I have to leave San Diego on Monday afternoon to meet with Socal that
night.  I have to come in on the week-end because air-fares are horrible
without  a Saturday night stay and I'd rather stay the week-end in San
Diego.  If you have any time on Sunday or can meet me on Monday  for
breakfast or lunch let me know.  I haven't finalized anything with Larry yet
but I plan on meeting him for breakfast or lunch on Monday but I want to
check with you  first.


James Scribner is enrolled in Derivatives II - Energy Derivatives Advanced
Structures & Marketing

Class Days and Times:
  7/13/2000  08:00:00 PM - 05:00:00 PM
  7/14/2000  08:00:00 PM - 05:00:00 PM
Participant Fee: $800.00

Thank you for your support in providing quality and cost effective
development opportunites at Enron.
Your Company and RC will be charged $800.00

If you have any questions, please call the Development Center Team at
713-853-0357.

Thank you.


I spoke to Randy. He also intends to get Helen a gift certificate. I told him to send it to Steve and he would get it to Helen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lord, Randy
Sent:	Monday, February 25, 2002 2:46 PM
To:	Kenagy, Gary
Cc:	Donovan, Bill; Woods, Steve; Corman, Shelley; January, Steve; Bryant, Mike; Rahn, Nick; Spriggs, Bernie
Subject:	RE: Elevator Maintenance

Gary,

Yesterdays elevator problem was caused initially by a broken belt on the governor on Car # 21. This controls the speed of the car, and the car is designed to stop where it is if something happens to the governor rather than risk an overspeed condition. We have had the car thoroughly checked over today to see what else we could determine about yesterdays problems. The intercom in this car does not work, but the alarm bell does work. I can't explain why no one heard the bell. We have taken the car out of service until the intercom is repaired.

There have been several changes within the Maintenance Department since the bankruptcy in December, but none that should have impacted the maintenance levels of the elevators. We have eliminated the 24 x 7 on site coverage by the Maintenance Department, and returned to an on call arrangement which we previously had until about a year ago. We had to reduce the size of our staff as did everyone else, and simply do not have enough people to adequately staff 24 x 7 any longer. We also had two full time Elevator Mechanics on site Monday through Friday during our peak. That, however, was when we had over 8,000 people in the building. During that time we had a lot of problems just because of the extremely heavy usage. Now that we have fewer than 3,000 people here, the usage does not warrant two full time mechanics, so we have cut back to one. The routine maintenance on the elevators is still accomplished on schedule by the one mechanic. Most of the other high rise buildings in town have either one or none. In the past the second mechanic was tied up with trouble calls which we have very few of now.

While it is not required by code, we have always made it an internal practice to do a physical inspection of all of the elevators and test all of their functions on a weekly basis. This is generally accomplished by Security or Maintenance either on Friday or Saturday after hours, as you must recall them to the lobby to do this. The inspections were not completed this past Saturday. This would normally not be a significant issue, as routines are interrupted from time to time due to other occurring problems. Unfortunately this time it was significant.

This past Sunday has pointed out several procedural issues that either need corrected or reviewed with our support personnel. I do not know what time it was determined that someone was stuck in the elevator, but Security contacted our on call person at approximately 11:45 A.M. The on call Tech then proceeded to the building arriving at about 12:25 P.M. Our person tried unsuccessfully to reset the elevator, and when that was not possible, he asked Security if Schindler was on their way. It was at that point the he learned that Schindler had not been contacted yet. Security then called Schindler at 12:37 p.m. and Schindler contacted their mechanic at 12:44 p.m. The Schindler tech arrived on site at 1:45 p.m. and had the person out of the elevator about 2:20 p.m. It is standing procedure for Security to contact Schindler immediately in the event of an entrapment. Failure to do this resulted in an extra hour before help arrived.

I am reviewing procedures with the Security Supervisor to insure there are no delays in contacting the elevator service immediately in cases of an entrapment. We are also reviewing the routine inspection procedures on the elevators to insure that they are inspected weekly and taken out of service if the intercom does not work properly. Security will remain responsible for these inspections since they have people here at night.

I sincerely regret the extreme inconvenience your employee went through yesterday, and I assure you we are taking every precaution to insure this does not happen again. Elevators will occasionally break, and there will occasionally be an entrapment, but 5 hours and no ability to communicate is not acceptable.

Randy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kenagy, Gary
Sent:	Monday, February 25, 2002 9:24 AM
To:	Lord, Randy
Cc:	Donovan, Bill; Woods, Steve; Corman, Shelley; January, Steve; Bryant, Mike; Rahn, Nick
Subject:	Elevator Maintenance

Randy,

Yesterday, Sunday the 24th, one of the Gas Control Dispatchers was stuck in an elevator for approximately 5 hours. Apparently the alarm and the intercom were not functioning and she had no way of notifying anyone that she was stuck between the 39th floor and the plaza. After other dispatchers became concerned about her being missing and searched for her, it was 2 hours before they determined she was stuck in an elevator. It then took another 3 hours to repair the elevator and get her out. We were advised by one of the guards that the weekly test and inspection of the intercoms was not performed on Saturday, as scheduled. We also were led to believe that the level of maintenance and monitoring of the elevators has recently changed.

As you know, the Gas Control Center on EB42 is a 7X24 operation. It goes without saying that this type of situation is unacceptable and that a post-mortem of the event is required to correct any maintenance or operating deficiencies that may exist. Please research the event and let us know the root cause of the elevator failure, the intercom failure, and any changes in maintenance and monitoring that may have contributed.

Thanks, Gary

Gary Kenagy
ETS Information Technology
713-853-3094
gary.kenagy@enron.com


FYI...see attached.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 10:03 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources  Canada Corp.   From:  Peter Keohane @ ECT                           05/15/2001 09:51 AM

To:	IT Calgary
cc:	John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	NGX et al Litigation Settlement - Press Release

The following message is to go to everyone in Calgary and Toronto ASAP.

We have settled our lawsuit with NGX, Canadian Enerdata, OM Gruppen and Richard Zarzeczny, regarding the compilation and methodology for calculating the Alberta natural gas price indices published by the Canadian Gas Price Reporter.  By the terms of the settlement there will be a joint press release issued this morning regarding the settlement, which is to be the only public communication regarding the matter unless agreed to by all parties.  A copy of the press release is attached below.  Otherwise the settlement is confidential to the parties.  Accordingly, there is to be no formal or informal discussion with media, colleagues, competitors, counterparties or otherwise.  If you receive  request, simply reply that you understand that the matter is confidential, but the request can be referred either to Rob Milnthorp or me and we will respond as appropriate.

If you have any questions, please speak to Rob or me.

Peter Keohane.

 - Press Release-Enron Deal-May 15-2001..doc


I believe that Alex Goldberg indicated that he would do so.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia Godley [mailto:PFG@VNF.COM ]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:26 PM
To: EL00-95@LISTSERV.GSA.GOV
Subject: NOx and Start-Up Costs Conference Call
Who is scheduling this call?  Thanks.
Patricia Fry Godley
Van Ness Feldman
(202) 298-1940
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication.  Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Attached is the final Duque decision. It is the clean version of the draft I
faxed on 8/21.

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/24/2000
11:40 AM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 08/23/2000 09:38:31 PM
To: <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>,
<rschlanert@electric.com>, <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <kmagrude@enron.com>,
<mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <athomas@newenergy.com>,
<Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>, <andrew.madden@utility.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>, <chris.king@utility.com>, <david.bayless@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Decision 00-08-037 (Signed 8/21/00)

In case you didn't receive the final version of the decision voted out on
Monday approving the Duque "rate stabilization plan," here it  is.? The Wood
and Lynch dissents will be sent separately.
?
Dan
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:25:38 -0400
From: "White, Ann" <abw@cpuc.ca.gov>
Subject: Decision 00-08-037 (Signed 8/21/00)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_7A22EA27.04653675"

?
?
 - Ivy.gif
 - CPUC01-#77888-v-1-I0008002_Carew_Letter.DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Merideth, Ken (EKT)" <Ken.Merideth@entergykoch.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:07 AM
To:	'tom.hahn@apbenergy.com'; Carson, Mike
Subject:	FW:  layletter

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Goodman, David (EKT)
> Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:45 AM
> To:	Merideth, Ken (EKT)
> Subject:	 layletter
>
>
>
> . <<layletter.pdf>>

 - layletter.pdf


----- Forwarded by Mike Heffner/ICF on 08/23/2001 08:30 AM -----

> >
> >
> > <<Attach.jpg>>  <<Attach1.jpg>>  <<Attach2.jpg>>  <<Attach3.jpg>>

(See attached file: Attach.jpg)
(See attached file: Attach1.jpg)
(See attached file: Attach2.jpg)
(See attached file: Attach3.jpg)

 - Attach.jpg
 - Attach1.jpg
 - Attach2.jpg
 - Attach3.jpg


ITAA

 The  Information Technology Association of America's (ITAA) ASP  Program is proud to announce the latest   ASP Webcast ?

 "Service  Management and Service-Centric Computing"

 Wednesday,  October 24, 2001 from 11:00am  to 12:00pm Eastern
 Presented  by:  Elliot Kass, Director of Marketing, iCan SP (A  Computer Associates Company)

 Register  Today!   	 [IMAGE]  	  Sign  In

 [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]
 Service  Management and Service-Centric Computing
 ITAA  is proud to offer its latest  ASP  Webcast.

 ITAA Logo 	 ITAA is proud to present its latest  Webcast as part of the Application Service Provider (ASP) program  presentation series. The focus of this event will be on service management  and service-centric computing.   Service-centric computing and its  complement-service management-are the two most important developments  shaping our industry today. For years, the business world has been  searching for a way to make information technology better suited to the  ever-shifting realities of the market. Now thanks to service-centric  computing-also known as the 'utility model'-it has one.    This Webcast will explore how  service management technology enables service providers to offer IT  services on demand. Specifically it will explain how you can:    ? Allocate Internet costs by user,  application or account ? Manage and service levels and create  enforceable SLAs ? Rapidly roll out new services-while keeping costs in  check ? Compete effectively in today's cost-sensitive, service-oriented  IT environment   About the  Presenter: Elliot Kass is iCan SP's Director of Marketing  and is responsible for all marketing and communications worldwide. Prior  to joining the Computer Associates' subsidiary in November, 2000, Kass was  at IBM, where he led a wide range of eBusiness and Web-based initiatives  for the company's 90,000 channel partners. He spent fifteen years at CMP  Media in editorial management and was instrumental in the launch of  several leading publications, including InformationWeek,  CommunicationsWeek and InternetWeek. As Editor of CommunicationsWeek, and  later InternetWeek, Kass launched several of the first-ever commercial Web  sites. He has written on technology-related issues for such leading  industry analysts as the Gartner Group, as well as for numerous  publications, including Computerworld, Windows Magazine and The Washington  Post. Kass, a native of New York's Long Island, has lived in such varied  climes as Santa Fe, New Mexico; Arhus, Denmark and the People's Republic  of China. He is an avid hiker and skier, a mediocre tennis player and  greatly enjoys good historical fiction.
   	 [IMAGE] more  info

 [IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]

				 [IMAGE]
				 [IMAGE]


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/15/2000 01:35 PM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	08/14/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/14/00

The EOL approvals for 08/14/00 are attached below.

Regards,
bd


Dear Kevin,

Everyone knows that the days after Thanksgiving are
a great time for bargain shoppers -- well, it's a great
time for travel bargain shoppers, too! And our best deals
are easy to find: You won't need to drive to the mall or
spend hours searching for a parking space. Just click to
our Deals pages and you'll find travel bargains galore,
like hotels from $19, flights from $92, vacation packages
from $224, and more.

Travel deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b100028b36&rfrr=-1410

Hotel Deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=00008687a00028b36&rfrr=-1410

Flight Deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868e300028b36&rfrr=-1410

Vacation package deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868db00028b36&rfrr=-1410

============================================================
YOUR FARES
============================================================
- Houston, TX (IAH-Bush Intercontinental) to Denver, CO (DEN-Denver Intl.)
Airlines' lowest published fare: $178 (plus tax)
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=FARECALENDAR&FrAirport=IAH&ToAirport=DEN&NumAdult=1&rfrr=-1410&EAPid=8512-1

Fares found by Expedia shoppers: $265 - $648 (includes tax)
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=FareCmpSearch&FrAirport=IAH&ToAirport=DEN&rfrr=-1410&EAPid=8510-1

Check hotel rates in this destination city:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868dd00028b36&GOTO=HotSearch&CityName=Denver,%20CO%20(DEN-Denver%20Intl%2E)&rfrr=-1410

- Houston, TX (IAH-Bush Intercontinental) to Vail, CO (EGE-Eagle County)
Airlines' lowest published fare: $258 (plus tax)
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=FARECALENDAR&FrAirport=IAH&ToAirport=EGE&NumAdult=1&rfrr=-1410&EAPid=8512-1

Check hotel rates in this destination city:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868dd00028b36&GOTO=HotSearch&CityName=Vail,%20CO%20(EGE-Eagle%20County)&rfrr=-1410

============================================================
EXPEDIA'S TOP TRAVEL DEALS
============================================================

- FLIGHT DEALS
U.S. flights from $92, Caribbean flights from $262, more:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868e300028b36&rfrr=-1410

Fly Lufthansa, save an extra 5% on already low Europe fares:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b300028b36&rfrr=-1410

Save up to 60% on your flight with Expedia Bargain Fares:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=00008687b00028b36&rfrr=-1410

- VACATION PACKAGE DEALS
Orlando family fun deal! Three-night vacation from $209:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=32&DestId=178294&rfrr=-1410

Caribbean sale -- up to 30% off select all-inclusive trips:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868e700028b36&rfrr=-1410

Honolulu -- four-night Waikiki Beach vacation from $506:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=PKGDEALDETAILS&DispSection=33&DestId=180077&rfrr=-1410

See our best vacation deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868db00028b36&rfrr=-1410

- HOTEL DEALS
Hit the slopes! Ski hotel deals from $74 per night:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868df00028b36&rfrr=-1410

Maui's Four-star Aston Kaanapali Shores from $138:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868b200028b36&GOTO=HotDetails&HotelID=1284&numadult=1&merchtext=Special+Deal!+Enjoy+rates+from+$138+per+night+for+stays+between+now+and+December+22%2E+Book+today+and+save!&rfrr=-1410

Save an additional 25% off Wyndham/ESR hotels everywhere:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f000028b36&rfrr=-1410

See our best hotel deals in 40 top destinations:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=00008687a00028b36&rfrr=-1410

- CRUISE DEALS
Seven-day Western Caribbean cruise on Princess from $499:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f800028b36&d=&i=780657&c=40&v=175&pex=191&rfrr=-1410

Seven-day northbound Alaska cruise on Carnival from $649:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f800028b36&d=&i=743873&c=1&v=29&pex=192&rfrr=-1410

11-day Hawaiian Islands cruise on Royal Caribbean from $749:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f800028b36&d=&i=796029&c=44&v=219&pex=193&rfrr=-1410

See special discounted cruise deals:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f100028b36&rfrr=-1410

- CAR RENTAL DEAL
Save with Avis! Get up to 15% off your rental car:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f900028b36&rfrr=-1410

============================================================
EXPLORE EXPEDIA
============================================================
Expedia Recommends Chicago -- It's your kinda town.
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f200028b36&rfrr=-1410

Cancun Slide Show -- Bask in the warm sunshine of Mexico.
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861fa00028b36&rfrr=-1410

Expedia.com Best Places -- See Waikiki's historic charms.
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f300028b36&rfrr=-1410

============================================================
VACATION RENTAL DEALS FROM $75 PER NIGHT
============================================================

Vacation Rentals: All the comforts of home, from $75!

Check out our Vacation Rental Deals, for great rates on
vacation homes, condos, and villas in the United States and
around the world. Vacation Rentals are the ultimate
vacation solution for families and groups.

http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861fb00028b36&rfrr=-1410

============================================================

UNSUBSCRIBE
If you do not wish to receive any further promotional
e-mails from us, please click here:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868d900028b36&qscr=info&rfrr=-1410

Or simply reply to this mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

CONTACT US
If you'd like to give us feedback, please click here:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000868d900028b36&qscr=fbak&rfrr=-1410

For additional assistance, visit the Expedia.com Customer Support Center:
http://expedia.cq0.net/r/default.asp?R=0000861f400028b36&rfrr=-1410

Prices are subject to change without notice.

(c)2001 Expedia, Inc. All rights reserved.

This email was sent to:  kevin.hyatt@enron.com


Nov 7, 1999 12:48 PM

Jeffrey Dasovich,

Your registration for the Traffic School To Go program has been recorded.  We
hope that everything is clear and that you will have no problem successfully
completing the program but if you need help, please reply to this Email with
your questions or phone toll free - (888) 349-8425.

Remember, this is EXACTLY how you will need to re-enter your information
when logging back in to the program:

license state = California
license number= N7889351

To log into the course, visit the following URL:
http://www.trafficschooltogo.com/students/

If you find you have made an error in entering your license information, use
the incorrect information to log in.  Once logged in, you will have the
option of correcting the error by hitting the "Personal Information" button
on your "Student Control Panel" at the bottom of any page.  Thereafter, the
corrected license information will log you in.

Oh, and just to confirm, we have the following mailing
address information for you:

366 Dolores St., #3
San Francisco, CA 94110

If this is incorrect, use your "Personal Information" button to fix it. In
fact, please be sure to double-check (and change if necessary) all of your
"Personal Information" sometime before you finish so that we can reach you if
there's a problem or so that your certificate does not go astray due to a
typo in your mailing address. Thanks.

Sincerely,

Peggy Goldman
Traffic School To Go
http://www.trafficschooltogo.com
(888) 349-8425


Come chat with me when you get a chance.  I see you are not at your desk, as
usual.


I LOVE MY SWEATS!


fyi, rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 01:02 PM
---------------------------

From:  Rudi Zipter
 02/20/2001 11:19 AM

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: SK-Enron Korean Won exposure

Rick,

I wanted to touch base with you regarding our Korean Won exposure.  As you
know, a remaining issue involves who is responsible for these types of hedges
Corp or business unit.

The currency traders on Hickerson's desk contacted me today.  They mentioned
that it is an appropriate time to put a currency hedge in place for 3 reasons:

1.) The spot rate has fallen back to the 1230 KRW/USD level
2.) The forward rate is relatively flat as there is no signifcant difference
in 1 year rates between the two currencies.
3.) Option volatilities have decreased significantly over the past month.

Please let me know if (when?) we should discuss this issue further.  The
currency traders mentioned that they will bubble this issue up with Jim
Hughes again later today.

Thanks,

Rudi


Vince and Ravi,

Attached below is the resume of a student graduating from the University of
Chicago with an MS in Mathematics.  His specialty is financial mathematics
and his coursework seems to have covered a lot of the sorts of things that I
understand your group to do, Vince.  He is extremely interested in Enron and
contacted me because I am an alum of the College at the U of C.  I gather he
didn't go through Enron's typical recruiting process for Analysts or
Associates because his background is more technical, than commercial.  He
acknowledged that his business experience is limited and from his resume you
can tell that he is young.  He would therefore be willing to start as an
Analyst or whatever the equivalent would be for a non-rotating position, but
his interest is in doing the kind of work that you do, Vince, and Ravi, I
know you have a similar background.

Please let me know if this candidate would be of interest to either of you.
If so, feel free to contact him directly.  He would like to start work this
summer after graduating in June.

Thanks for your time and I hope this is useful to you.

Regards,
Laura

Laura Howenstine
Manager, Origination
Enron Net Works
713-853-0308 (office)
laura.howenstine@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Kodjo Adovor" <adovor@math.uchicago.edu>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kodjo+20Adovor+22+20+3Cadovor+40math+2Euchicago+2Eedu+3E
+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Howenstine, Laura
Cc: lhowenstine@hotmail.com
Subject:

Dear Laura,
Thanks for taking the time to talk to me about the opportunities available
in Financial Derivatives at Enron. I appreciate your help. My resume is
attached to this email as Resume.doc. I look forward to talking to you soon.

Regards,

N. Kodjo Adovor
The University of Chicago
Financial Mathematics

 - Resume.doc


Pagers, Cell Phones, etc should be cancelled as of closing which I believe to be June 1st, I will let you know if there are any changes.  When I arrange for new traders I will need computers for them.  I have talked to Ed and Brian and they have agreed to give me 4 computers back prior to closing.  I anticipate needing 2 of them prior to the end of the month.  How much lead time do you need to have them brought down here?  Did you get the message out about customer entertainment?

Thanks,

Tom


Maybe just half a day for me.


Stephanie,

Can you provide Travis, the ClickPaper lawyer, with a copy of the Japanese
ETA?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 01:50 PM -----

	Travis McCullough
	08/03/2000 01:43 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Japan

Tana, I think Edmund may be on holiday; do you know who might be able to pull
the Japan ETA for me?  Thanks.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Kathleen,

I will initial and leave these in my office in a file folder with your name.
Carlos has my proxy on the consent.

I'm also leaving you with a couple of original CA's for Fred.  He was going
to email them to the other side for comment, so HANG ON to the pages I signed.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/22/2000 12:55 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Signature Page

Ignore earlier version, ECT no longer exists so there is a change in the
signature block to read ENA Corp. f/k/a ECT

PS Michelle checked in her voicemails and shot me back a positive one in
response to the one that I left on Tuesday (ie, there's interest and we need
to find the right fit.)


Paul Trishmann --Check the spelling.


I am not who you think I am.  I have never been in IDRC nor am I in the
profession.
Thx,
John

Jeannine Peaker <jeannine.peaker@idrc.org> on 09/12/2000 02:09:32 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: (no subject)

We are still showing you as an Active member of IDRC. Do you wish to resign
from the membership?

-----Original Message-----
From: jarnold@ect.enron.com [mailto:jarnold@ect.enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:59 PM
To: Jeannine Peaker
Subject: (no subject)

Remove me from your mailing list please.


Josh - Susan Scott, legal, requested to fax her a copy of the Gallup/Rolls
Royce compressor PO  for review.

Her fax: 713-853-5425
phone: 713-853-0596

Let me know when it's been sent.

Thanks

JT


Please match deal 203315 (CES sale for Mar) with deal 209122.
-


I am aware that you need a list from me, I am working on it right now.  I
just got the list from EOL yesterday and I'm reviewing it as fast as I can.
My goal is to get it done by the end of my workday, so you should have it
when you arrive in the morning.


Kate, checking on deal  318870.01, it is an EOL deal and looks like it has
been changed.  Once an EOL trade is transacted we are not suppose to change
the deal.  Please let me know why the ch took place.

Thanks
Stephanie


Carie Robert (pronounced Robear) X33522 does floor tours for visitors

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
01:26 PM ---------------------------
From: Cary M Carrabine@ENRON on 01/24/2001 11:11 AM
To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: T J Aruffo in Houston

FYI.   We need to get back to Doug as soon as possible.  This should be a
good
opportunity to meet his new boss.

----- Forwarded by Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 10:51 AM -----

	"Walker, R. Douglas" <rdwalker@nisource.com>
	01/24/2001 09:06 AM

		 To: "Cary Carrabine (E-mail)" <ccarrab@ect.enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: T J Aruffo in Houston

As we discussed, my new boss, TJ Aruffo is interested in a tour of Enron's
Houston Trade Floor.  He is available the morning of the 1st.  He is flying
out of Intercontinental at 2:45 PM.  As far as I know he will be travelling
alone.  He  has not requested my presence yet.

The purpose of his visit is to see first-hand a world-class energy trade
floor and to begin networking with key industry personnel.  He is new to
this side of the business.  His previous role was NiSource CIO; so he comes
into his new position with a systems and process oriented view.   His
responsibilities at NiSource encompass the regulated gas supply management
and gas control operations of eight of NiSource's gas utilities (two are
primarily managed by EnergyUSA-TPC - NIFL and Kokomo).  He is responsible
for Bay State (and Northern Utilities), NIPSCO, and the Columbia
Distribution Companies (five LDC's).  We are currently fragmented in
Massachusetts, Columbus and Indiana and are in the process of evaluating how
to bring this together, functionally, locationally, or not at all.  TJ
reports to Pat Mulchay, who is President of the Merchant Energy Division.
Pat reports directly to Gary Neale, our CEO.

TJ's previous background includes a stint at Fidelity Investments, so a
trade floor is not new to him.

Please confirm Enron's address and if you don't mind, recommend a hotel that
is convenient.  Let me know who will be meeting TJ then we can  turn the
details of finalizing the arrangements over to TJ and your designee.  Thanks
for your help.

 - C.DTF


We are long 25 mws in NP-15 at $54 for HE 7-22.  This is under the ST-WBOM line in CAPS.  We are long at $54.00
Call me with any questions...
Thanks,
Bill


Attached is a draft copy of Transwestern's application requesting authorization to abandon the existing units at Stations 1, 2, 3 and 4 and install a 38,000 HP unit at each station.  Please note that Ron will be revising Exhibit G.   Please provide comments and the signed FERC approval form no later than 5 P.M. on Monday, 2/26.  Thanks.  Donna


Can you look into this?

Thanks
----- Forwarded by Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 09:53 AM -----

	Leslie Robinson@ENRON
	04/18/2001 08:27 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rosa Brown/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: HPL assignment to ENA

Texas Utilities Fuel (k#012-88968-02-001) is trying to hold HPL responsible
for imbalances incurred after October 1998, but according to the contract
brief Texas Utilities Fuel  was assigned to ENA.  No one in contracts can
find the assignment paperwork.  They don't know if it was misplaced or never
done, and the counterparty was not informed of the assignment.  For our
records and Texas Utilities' would you or, since your busy with Triple Lux,
whomever in legal type up the paperwork.  Let me know what you need from me,
and I will be more than happy to get it for you.  Thanks.


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043010.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I regret to inform you that Ken Rice and Kevin Hannon have decided to leave Enron to pursue other opportunities.  Most recently, Ken had been assisting in the transition of Enron Broadband Services to Wholesale Services.  Kevin recently left Broadband Services to lead our Global Assets business.

In addition to building a wholesale model for the trading of bandwidth as a commodity, Ken and Kevin made significant contributions to the development of our wholesale business.  I am grateful to both of them for their outstanding service to Enron.

I am pleased to announce that effective immediately Stan Horton, chairman and CEO of Enron Transportation Services, will assume additional leadership responsibility as chairman and CEO of Enron Global Assets, excluding the South American merchant business, which will continue to report to John Lavorato.  Stan is a 28-year veteran of the company with a proven track record of outstanding results.  Enron Global Assets will continue to function as a separate unit headed by President and Chief Operating Officer Jim Hughes, who will report to Stan.

Please join me in supporting Stan in his expanded role and in wishing Ken and Kevin the very best of success in their new endeavors.


Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tom Shelton                           09/15/2000 11:44 AM

To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L
Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron, jem@ctw.com
cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Curtailment Plan

We are going to be reviewing the HPL curtailment plan, with the ultimate
issue being how does HPL best structure its curtailment program to comply
with regulatory requirements and to best suit HPL,s business purposes.
Attached is a memo meant to provide a brief summary about what a curtailment
plan is and some of  its ramifications.  We,ll be setting up a meeting soon
to discuss the issues surrounding the curtailment regulations and their
significance to HPL.  Certainly there will be critical legal, regulatory,
commercial, operational, gas control, accounting, and even public relation
issues to be considered in this deliberation.  Whatever the decision may be
as to what to do, we must also determine how to find out relevant facts,
establish the processes to be followed, and perform the necessary procedures
to implement our action plan.


Brooke Smith
267 West 89th street
New York, NY 10024
bestbrooke@mindspring.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Brooke Smith


This the latest on the move.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hennessy, Sonia
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:01 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	 Move Information for the 6th floor

I just wanted to keep you posted on the information that I know so far about the move.  Of course, it could change with in the next five minutes so it's not written in stone.

As of now, the move for the  6 th floor is scheduled for Friday (2/8).  Not exactly sure what time this is going to take place yet.  Please make sure that everyone is packed and ready by early Friday morning..  If there is someone out on Friday, please make sure they pack before they leave or you have someone pack their stuff for them.  Please make sure that everyone cleans out their desk completely.  I know that boxes are hard to find right now.  If any of you know that you will need quite a few boxes for your groups, please let me know ASAP so I can have them delivered by Thursday .  I know that there are some boxes on floor 4 in the South building, so you might want to just go grab some.  Labels hopefully will be here Friday morning.  Once I get them I will immediately pass them out.  I have attached the floor plan for the 6 th floor for those of you that want to know where your groups are going (if you don't know already) .  Plus you might want to show it to your groups so they know where to report to on Monday morning.

If you have any other questions please let me know.  I will update you as soon as I find out more or if there are any changes to this schedule.

Thanks,
Sonia Hennessy
Enron Networks
Phone# 713-345-4858
Fax# 713-646-2443
Location:  EB3103g
sonia.hennessy@enron.com


67

george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com on 03/07/2001 09:39:04 AM
To: george.ellis@americas.bnpparibas.com
cc:
Subject: BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures Weekly AGA Survey

Good Morning,

Just a reminder to get your AGA estimates in by Noon EST (11:00 CST) TODAY.

Last Year      -37
Last Week      -101

Thanks,
George Ellis
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures, Inc.

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


Don,
?
I have?extended your trial toTradersNews Power  until February 2.?
?
YOU MUST FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS TO RE-ACTIVATE  YOUR ACCOUNT.
?
ACCOUNT ACTIVATION INSTRUCTIONS:
?
1. Launch a web browser
2. Go to our home page at? www.tradersnewspower.com
3.?Click on any link
4. Scroll down to the logon box on the left and  enter your Username and
Password
????
??????? Username  =?EnronHr1????? ?? (case  sensitive)
??????? Password  =??power?????????????  (case sensitive)
?
5.?Hit enter
6. You will now access our news page.? Please  bookmark this page for future
reference.
?
If you have any questions, problems or comments,  please contact ?me.
?
Best Regards,
?
Barbara Clancey
Customer Support Representative
Internet Publishing Group, Inc
215-504-4288 x222
barbara.clancey@ipgdirect.com


Do you have any plans for July 29th? If not, would you like to come to Ryan's
stag? You could play golf with Darryl Brown, Ryan's dad and their friend Dave.
I think those guys are going to play golf and then come to dinner afterwards.
Let me know either way.

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:08 PM ---------------------------

"FT.com" <octsubs1@newsbyemail.ft.com> on 10/24/2000 01:46:46 PM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Your preferences are important

Dear FT.com User

Your FT.com mailing  preferences are currently set to receive email
updates from us about FT.com and other FT group products or services.

To comply with our obligations under UK data protection legislation,
we are giving you this opportunity to update your privacy preferences.
We are now also giving you the option to receive email communications
from other organisations about products and services offered by them
or offered jointly with the FT group.

If you DO NOT wish to be contacted for this reason, please visit

http://registration.ft.com/registration/editRegistrationDetails.jsp

and tick box C.  You may also use this link to edit or update any of the
information currently held on your registration record.

To access your personal record, you will be required to input your FT.com
username and password.

Your current username is: vincentkaminski

For security reasons we have not included your password, but if you visit:

http://registration.ft.com/registration/passwordLookup.jsp

and supply the user name and e-mail address with which you originally
registered, it will be emailed directly to you.

If we do not hear from you we will assume that you do not wish to change your
present preferences and that you have no objection to receiving carefully
selected offers and information from other organisations.  You can of course
edit your registration profile at any time by clicking on the Edit Your
Profile
link on the FT.com homepage.

If you have any queries, please e-mail our Customer Services Team on
help@ft.com  Thank you for your time and participation in this important
update.

Regards
FT.com

-----------------------------------------------------------

If you no longer wish to receive further e-mails from FT.com,
please send an e-mail to: ft.com.unsubscribe@newsbyemail.ft.com
with the single word "unsubscribe" as the subject of the message.
Your name will then be removed from our mailing list.


Russell would like to schedule a meeting to discuss MGU on Wednesday March
7th from 2:30 to 5:00.  Please let me know if this works with your schedules.

Thank you,
Lynn
(312) 541-1379


Janet,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Greetings All:

First, I am apologizing in advance for any typos in this email.  Schedule is
very tight, but I wanted to make sure that everyone had it first thing this
morning, with some back-up info that I've included below.

Attached is the email that was sent to Ken Lay's office yesterday evening for
delivery to Sen. Brulte.  It's of course confidential.  Few points:

I don't have Bev's email, so if you could please forward to her, that would
be appreciated.
As we discussed (Jim, Mike, Bev, Scott, Hedy) on our lengthy call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that the plan is still to "wallpaper" Sacramento with
our proposed legislation.
This email does not contain the legislation.  Mike sent the "final" versions
of our legislation out yesterday, except for the siting piece, which I
believe Brian Cragg of Mike's office is finalizing today.
You'll note that we promise Senator Brulte in the email that we'll deliver to
his office today the proposed legislation.  Again, based on our call on
Wednesday, I'm assuming that we would simultaneously release the proposed
legislation to the rest of the world at the same time.
When we spoke on Wednesday, we decided that the Sacramento team would
determine to whom we would circulate the proposed legislation at the same
time that we deliver the Senator Brulte. I'm assuming that you folks will
handle that end of things.  Please let us know at your convenience to whom
you've decided to circulate.
This email does, however, include a "summary" of our proposed legislation.
But I'm not certain that the summary included in this email is the
appropriate language to distribute "to the world," or if we'll need instead
to tailor some new language.  I think we all agreed that we need a "one
pager" to accompany the legislative package so that we can communicate the
package effectively.
We also discussed the need to quickly develop a coalition to support our
proposals.  We didn't finalize that plan.  Perhaps the Sacramento team could
propose a plan to do that.  Perhaps we could start with our friends in the
Direct Access coalition?
We also talked about the need at this point to engage in PR and to get the PR
machinery activated, also with the goal of effectively communicating our
legislative package/message.  We're in a meeting with folks today where we
can discuss getting that side of things going and Karen Denne has contacted
Marathon and they're pondering some things that we can do in the near term.
You'll note that there's a considerable amount of information about the DWR
credit issue.  As I recollect, we discussed the issue in depth on the call.
You note that attached to the email is a "legislative fix" to AB1X that could
solve the credit issue and an attached set of "taking points" related to a
second alternative to solving the credit issue:  a PUC order clarifying that
DWR will get its money for power purchase costs.
Note also that Steve Kean reminded me that we've got to continue to push to
get the utilities out of the merchant function.  Accordingly, I've put a
brief paragraph on that issue in the note to Brulte in the last section
(legislative solution) under the topic "create a real competitive retail
market in California."  To the best of my knowledge, we don't have
legislative language on that piece yet, and it seems that we'll need to
discuss it in considerably more depth before doing so.

If you have any questions about any of the materials in the email, please
don't hesitate to contact me or Jim or Sandi to discuss.  I can be best
reached to day by pager at 888.916.7184.

Thanks to all for helping pull this together.

Best,
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/16/2001 08:27 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Steve:
Here's a substantially more cleaned-version, with attachments.  There's a
hard copy on your chair.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 05:57 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office tomorrow detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will
also identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our
proposed language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


Elizabeth,

 Per your request, I have prepared the following summary.

Western RTO Development:

RTO West.
Area to be included -- WA, OR, ID, MT, Western WY, UT, NV-North & South and
hopefully Canada (BC Hydro and possibly Alberta)
Filed with FERC "Stage 1" documents in October 2000 -- Governance, Bylaws,
Draft of Operating Agreement, etc.
Stage 2 development begun January 2001 with of complete proposal in July 2001
Earliest practical operation Fall 2002 (optimistic based on quick on approval
time)
Plan Quality -- Good overall
Attractive Features -- independent board, single control area and real time
voluntary energy market, all parties on same tariff, a tradeable transmission
right with "use or lose" anti-hoarding provisions.
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users for a ten year period ("use or lose" will mitigate for short
term rights but long term rights on existing system will be tough to get).
Desert STAR.
Area to be included -- AZ, NM, CO, Eastern WY
Governance established and Board has been organized.
Have not yet filed a complete plan
Earliest practical operation Winter 2002 or beyond, depending on when they
actually file their proposal
Plan quality --  Potentially promising
Attractive Features -- similar transmission right regime as RTO West
Unknown -- whether they will have a single control area, whether
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users, board selection committee was manipulated by publics (however
in practice the independent board selected seems to have been little affected
by the search firm nomination process)
CA-ISO.
Area included -- CA IOU's only
Fully operational but with CA/FERC jurisdictional struggle over Board
appointment and independence.
Modifications to meet Order 2000 have been filed which appear to move
transmission rights close to the proposals under discussion in RTO West and
Desert STAR

Cooperative Regional Organization Activity:

Seams.
A joint task force of parties involved in RTO West, Desert STAR and CA-ISO
began meeting in November 2000
Three major seams issues identified and work begun
Scheduling time lines -- aligning processes between three RTOs so that
business across seams boundaries is not hampered for administrative reasons.
Nature of transmission rights and effect on loop flow -- making the
congestion management systems work between the three RTOs.
Export fees -- goal is to eliminate pancaking of fixed cost charges between
RTOs, perhaps by annual transfer payments between RTOs or some other
reciprocity agreement.
RTG Consolidation.
WRTA. SWRTA and WSCC voted to merge in to a single organization, the WIO
(Western Interconnection Organization)
WIO will have three committee:   Planning, Operations, Market Interface.
The Northwest organization (NRTA) has decided to stay independent for now,
but if RTO West forms it may just disappear as a separate organization.

If you need more detail, please let me know.

Steve

	Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
	01/26/2001 12:24 PM

		 To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info

Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California.  Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information.  I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well.  Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!

Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California.  Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.

Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated.  Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were.  What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?

Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.

Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.

Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX.  Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean.  Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.

Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.

Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal.  Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.

Thanks for your help!


Attached is the language I received regarding increased costs.  I would like
to determine this morning if this language is acceptable to Enron.

---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

"Ruth Schonfeld" <Ruth.Schonfeld@macleoddixon.com> on 09/20/2000 12:54:47 AM
To: <Dpef@blakes.com>, <Wbn@blakes.com>, <soma.gosh@encron.com>,
<brian.kerrigan@enron.com>, <greg.johnstone@enron.com>,
<peter.keohane@enron.com>, <Jimmckee@macleoddixon.com>,
<Blair.fleming@royalbank.com>, <ian.mcarthur@royalbank.com>
cc:
Subject: Enron - RBC Gas Swap

Attached for your review is a draft clause dealing with increased costs.  The
writer used a Blakes precedent as a starting point for this draft.

 - MACLEOD-.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000
08:03 AM ---------------------------

Tim O'Rourke@ENRON
10/10/2000 01:48 PM
Sent by: Stacey Dempsey@ENRON
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
sarah.a.davis@enron.com, Scott Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kirk
McDaniel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
etilney@enron.com, terrie_james@enron.net, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Enron has contracted with Cognitive Arts to develop a web-based training
system to be available for use by all of Enron,s management.

The goals of this project are to:

Enhance communication in the five key areas identified from the recent ETC
survey (the percentages indicate the number of employees agreeing with the
following statements):
59%: Decisions are not communicated well
54%: Employees do not feel free to voice their opinions openly
55%: The company doesn,t act effectively on employee suggestions
70%: Communication is not good across departmental lines
61%: Employees are not encouraged to challenge established procedures and
policies

You have been identified as someone who?gives?valuable feedback.  I am asking
for approximately one and a half hours of your time to have an informal,
on-camera conversation with  Cognitive Arts so that we can capture your
stories and insights for inclusion into the system.  CogArts will be in
Houston conducting these interviews during the week of October 23rd.  If you
are available to  take part in these interviews, CogArts and myself  will
contact you the week of October 16th to brief you on  the specific topics
that will be covered and to answer any questions you may have.  Please let
Stacey Dempsey, ext. 30945,  know if you would be available for an interview
and when would be a good time for me to answer your questions.  Thank you for
your support.

Also, I am attaching a document that briefly desribes the interview process-
what to expect, how to prepare and it gives some suggestions on how you can
shape your responses to make them as effective as possible.

 - Enron_Expert_Interviewee_FAQ.doc

Tim O'Rourke


Legislative package only delays pain, critics warn
By Craig D. Rose
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
September 1, 2000
Consumer and political leaders -- as well as Sempra Energy's chief executive
-- said yesterday that the three electricity bills before Gov. Gray Davis do
nothing to fix the fundamental cause of soaring bills.
The cause, they say, is that power generators can continue to charge what
most characterize as exorbitant prices for their electricity -- and consumers
ultimately face the daunting task of paying them.
No matter if all of the bills are signed, the leaders say California's power
market will remain a seller's game that gouges overmatched consumers. And
while San Diego Gas and Electric Co.'s hard-pressed customers may pay less
now, they will pay back all or nearly all the savings -- plus interest --
beginning in 2003.
"The governor's bill postpones the pain, but the pain is still there," said
Maureen O'Connor, a former mayor of San Diego who has been active in seeking
relief from the soaring bills afflicting SDG&E's 1.2 million electricity
customers.
The rate bill promoted by Davis and now awaiting his signature will have
SDG&E's customers pay about 6.5 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity, or
70 percent more than what they paid as recently as May.
Power companies, however, will continue to charge the customers as they have;
presently, they're charging about 21 cents per kilowatt hour for SDG&E
customers. The difference between 6.5 cents and whatever prices above that
level emerge from the state's volatile power market will be recorded as IOUs
for each customer in so-called balancing accounts.
A second bill before the governor could provide up to $150 million in state
money to help pay the balancing accounts, but the bulk of the IOUs will
almost certainly be paid by SDG&E customers themselves when they become due
in 2003 or 2004. A third bill before the governor would speed the
construction of power plants.
So while the rate bill lets customers pay less now than they owe, it
obligates them to pay the balance with interest later.
The situation creates the potential for a troublesome compounding effect: The
higher electricity prices grow, the more is set aside in the balancing
accounts -- and the greater the wallop to customer wallets when the accounts
come due.
Based upon prices now paid for future electric deliveries, Sempra Energy
estimates customers will owe $664 million by 2003. IOUs of that magnitude,
said SDG&E, will require that customers pay a surcharge of $40 monthly for a
year on top of whatever they are already paying for their power bills.
Keep in mind that typical residential bills at this time last year were about
$55; they now stand at about $130. Consumer advocates say it's likely power
prices will remain at levels that will lead to huge debts for customers under
the Davis proposal.
"The generators have shown themselves to be unconscionable in extorting
profits," said Nettie Hoge, executive director of TURN, a San Francisco-based
consumer group.
Hoge said the bills that emerged "seemed the best a corrupt system could spit
out." She added that TURN and other groups will shift their focus to
pressuring the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to restrain the electric
generating companies and wholesale power markets.
FERC, she said, must legally determine if charges from generating companies
are reasonable. TURN and other groups will also press for re-regulation of
the industry and will begin to explore municipally owned generating plants.
Michael Shames of the Utility Consumers' Action Network supports the Davis
bill, although he said it won't fix "the almost irreparably broken California
energy system."
"The problem is that California's electricity customers have been subjected
to market prices in a dysfunctional energy market," Shames said. "It's a
market controlled by the sellers of power and their cronies."
But Shames said the Davis bill provides at least temporary protection against
further rate shocks, and he expects taxpayers across the state will
ultimately assist SDG&E's customers in paying their electricity bills.
But Jamie Court, executive director of the Foundation for Taxpayer and
Consumer Rights, which has called for re-regulation of the industry, opposes
the rate-cap legislation.
"This keeps ratepayers and taxpayers on the hook for the costs," said Court,
who added that the bill also locks in near doubling of power rates compared
to last year.
Stephen Baum, chief executive officer of Sempra, said the bill puts SDG&E --
a Sempra subsidiary -- in the position of financing the difference between
what power companies charge for their power and what it collect from
customers over the next three years.
The balancing accounts, Baum said, could grow so large that they will
challenge Sempra's ability to borrow to cover them.
"The problem is with the wholesale markets," said Baum, who today becomes
chairman as well as chief executive of Sempra. "This legislation does nothing
but postpone a big bill."
He added that Sempra believed the bill included ambiguities that could be
illegal if not later clarified by the California Public Utilities Commission.
"If (the PUC) can't or won't, then I think the legislation is legally flawed
and can't stand," Baum said.