-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwarzbach, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Killen, Faith; Cook, Hazel; Evans, Stephen; Smith, Jeff E.; Ueckert, Allen W.; Tran, Agatha; Kaster, Mei-Ling; Boyd, Mike; Selzer, Howard; Galvan, Michael S.; May, Kevin; Lee, Dana; Nelson, Kimberley (EES); Geaccone, Tracy; Copeland, Erin; Smith, Kirk; Pritt, Deborah; Schield, Elaine; Davoli, Jim
Cc:	West, Terry
Subject:	September Capital Charge

Sorry for the late notice, but here's the info on September capital charge:

As was done for the 2Q flash in June, we will be using an estimate for the September Capital Charge.  However, unlike last time, we will rely on each of you to estimate your September (and Q3) capital charge, since we will be truing up to actuals YTD in October.  Please send us (myself and Terry West) what you will be incorporating into your flash.  If you have any questions, please give one of us a call.

Thanks,
Steve and Terry


I'm certainly OK with the arrangement long term if you're happy with your
seats.  I would have liked to get you down lower, but that won't be
possible today without a much larger contribution.

And I'm OK with you helping with the foundation contribution - you just
won't get any recognition from Texas or from the IRS with that arrangement.
And with the job market these days, there might come a time when I can't
continue my own level of giving and then everyone will have to make a
decision.   I'd lower my giving so that the total contribution was level
year after year.  If and when you decided to stop, I'd have to start making
up the difference again to keep my seats on row 3.  Or I'd be bumped
somewhere.

I got this many because people started asking about getting tickets - this
is probably how a lot of people do it.  I'm not sure today if I could add
any more to the general area where everyone is.  Sheila and Mark are still
getting tix.

Darron.C.Giron@enron.com on 08/30/2001 11:23:27 AM

To:   David Plaisance/US/FAS/PwC@FAS
cc:
Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

I didn't think about it from your point of view and if some day I decide
not to help anymore then you get hurt because your contribution falls.  So
just disregard that suggestion.

I guess I'm trying to feel you out about the possibility of continuing this
current arrangement long-term.  Because I will commit to purchase the
current two (and would like to get two more for a total of 4) from now on.
It really would be better for me to continue this arrangement rather than
get them on my own, because like you indicated, I would have to really pony
up alot of $$ to keep similar seats.  I'm just not sure what your plans
would be for my current tickets and if at some point you would like them
back for yourself.  How did you end up with so many?  Is Mark still getting
the two next to mine?  Just curious.  Don't worry about the OU tix,  I will
find you on Saturday.  Thanks as always.

DG

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   <david.plaisance@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cdavid+2Eplaisance+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:19 AM
   To:     Giron, Darron C.
   Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

   I got my files restored and indeed had you down for four OU tix.  So
   sorry.
   Let's try to hook up Saturday.

   I wouldn't mind help with the Foundation contribution, but the downside
   all
   belongs to you.  I could practically guarantee that if you were to split
   away and create your own foundation giving you'd get knocked out of your
   seats unless you jumped in at the $2500 level/yr or higher.  Any money
   given to me would not be qualified for a tax credit for you.  And if you
   decide in the future to start anyway, you lose all the prior years
   cumulative giving where you didn't start.  Any any money you gave me
   wouldn't mean we'd be guaranteed better OU tix (or season tix) because I
   would lower my personal contribution by the same amount.  I don't want
   to
   be on the hook for the extra contribution should you decide in the
   future
   to stop helping.  That said, that may not be important for you and you
   won't mind sending me dollars.

   I know I wouldn't be getting OU tix at all if it wasn't for my
   contribution
   to the Foundation.  Not all Foundation members are getting OU tix any
   more,
   so I continue to consider myself lucky to continue getting tickets at
   all.

   Your choice!

   Darron.C.Giron@enron.com on 08/27/2001 03:33:17 PM

   To:   David Plaisance/US/FAS/PwC@FAS
   cc:
   Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

   I believe it was $610.  That was (2X$195) + (4X$55).  The two I have are
   Sec 15 Row 18 Seats 1&2.

   I meant season tix.  But would probably also try to get OU as well.  I
   guess I'm wrestling with the idea of getting them in my name, but I know
   the seat location would not be very good.  I really would like to have 4
   season ticket seats together.  I have been getting these through you for
   6
   years now and don't have a problem with just continuing this
   arrangement.
   I also wouldn't be opposed to helping with the contribution to the
   Foundation if you think it would help.  Let me know.

   DG

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   <david.plaisance@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cdavid+2Eplaisance+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Monday, August 27, 2001 2:24 PM
      To:     Giron, Darron C.
      Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

      Darron - sorry - My hard drive crashed two weeks ago and I lost my
      records
      of who did what and how much.  Good news is I should get my
   restoration
      back this week.  Tell me what your OU seats were so I can pair them
   with
      seats close by, or exchange them for four together.

      I vaguely remember us talking about OU.  Do you remember how much you
      paid
      me?

      When you say two additional tix for next season, do you mean season
   and
      OU
      or just one or the other?  The only way you can get more OU seats
   than
      your
      season tix is if someone else in the group doesn't want to buy OU tix
      with
      their season tix.

      I'm glad they arrived so quickly.

      We'll get it worked out

      d

      Darron.C.Giron@enron.com on 08/27/2001 12:38:47 PM

      To:   David Plaisance/US/FAS/PwC@FAS
      cc:
      Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

      I just got the tickets.  Thanks for sending them.  I paid for 4 OU
      tickets,
      could you only get me 2?  Let me know.  I also wanted to ask you
   about
      the
      possibility of getting 2 additional tickets for next season.  I know
   you
      get quite a few each year, but don't know if you have extras
   available.
      Thanks again.

      DG

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   <david.plaisance@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cdavid+2Eplaisance+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:37 AM
         To:     Giron, Darron C.
         Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

         OU tix are in!

         We'll work out leaving the tix for you under the mat, unless you'd
      like
         me
         to fedex them to you.  Let me know

         d

         Darron.C.Giron@enron.com on 08/22/2001 10:42:07 AM

         To:   David Plaisance/US/FAS/PwC@FAS
         cc:
         Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

         It looks like we won't make it to Austin before the 1st.  I'll
      probably
         just ask you to leave the tix under your front door matt on the
   day
      of
         the
         NMSU game and we will stop by to pick them up.  I will verify this
      with
         you
         next week.  I can't believe the season is already upon us.  Any
   word
      on
         OU?

         Thanks
         DG

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   <david.plaisance@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cdavid+2Eplaisance+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Monday, July 23, 2001 9:47 AM
            To:     Giron, Darron C.
            Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

            Sorry I misspelled your name again.  Just let me know when.
      They'll
         be
            here

            d

            Darron.C.Giron@enron.com on 07/23/2001 09:37:06 AM

            To:   David Plaisance/FAS/Price Waterhouse@FAS
            cc:
            Subject:  RE: Season tix are in

            I may be in Austin later this summer.  I'm in no hurry to get
   the
            tickets.
            If you will, please hang on to them and I'll advise at a later
      date.
            Thanks.

            DG

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   <david.plaisance@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+3Cdavid+2Eplaisance+40us+2Epwcglobal+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Sunday, July 22, 2001 3:17 PM
               To:     dgiron@enron.com
               Subject:  Season tix are in

               Darin - The season tickets are in; OU tickets will be mailed
         later.
            How
               do
               you want to pick them up?  Any plans to be in Austin, soon?

               Regards

               David

               512-278-1716 (o)
               512-272-5009 (h)

      ----------------------------------------------------------------
               The information transmitted is intended only for the person
   or
         entity
            to
               which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
         privileged
               material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
   other
      use
         of,
            or
               taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
      persons
         or
               entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
   If
      you
               received
               this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
      material
         from
               any
               computer.

   ----------------------------------------------------------------
            The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
      entity
         to
            which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
      privileged
            material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
   use
      of,
         or
            taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
   persons
      or
            entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If
   you
            received
            this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
   material
      from
            any
            computer.

   **********************************************************************
         This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
      affiliate
         and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use
      of
         the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure
         by
         others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or
         authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or
         reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
         all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
      are
         not
         intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
      evidence
         a
         binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
   its
         affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
      not
         be
         relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
      otherwise.
         Thank you.

   **********************************************************************

         ----------------------------------------------------------------
         The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
   entity
      to
         which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
   privileged
         material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
   of,
      or
         taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
   or
         entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you
         received
         this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
   from
         any
         computer.

      ----------------------------------------------------------------
      The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
   to
      which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
      material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
   or
      taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
      entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you
      received
      this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
      any
      computer.

   ----------------------------------------------------------------
   The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
   which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
   material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
   taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
   entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you
   received
   this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
   any
   computer.

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Your approval of the following product type in Datamanager is needed:

US East Power Fin Swap Unplan B ENA (INTERNAL ONLY)

Please do not approve between the hours of 6 am and 11 am.

US Pwr Swap ENA  ERCOT Peak              Jun01           USD/MWh

A US Power financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under
which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted
by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional
Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination
Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website,
multiplied by the number of applicable hours in such Determination Period.
Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the term of the
Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for Transactions which are less than one
month will be the fifth (5th) Business Day following the last day of the
month that includes the Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) for
Transactions which are one month or longer will be the fifth (5th) Business
Day following the date on which the Floating Price is determinable.
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Jun 2001 to the Termination Date 30
Jun 2001.
The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
daily prices listed in the Index for power delivered during Peak hours on
each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating
Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the daily
prices published in Megawatt Daily's Market Report under the headings "Trades
for Standard 16-Hour Daily Products;Weighted Average Index; ERCOT-B"  (the
"Index").
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200
(10:00 pm) Central Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Could you please send Scot Chambers the project costs on USEC.  Thanks
Ben


Gerald,

Attached is an electronic copy of the most recent Stagecoach Compression
Services Agreement.  This version reflects the comments that you made while
in San Antonio.

Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or further
revisions.  I will keep you updated on the status of the deal.

Thanks for your help,

John


Today's stuff...

 - Initiatives.doc


would you have any interest?

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2001 06:02
PM ---------------------------
From: Basil Karampelas/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 11:55 AM
To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Resume of Randy Balhorn

Greg - here is Randy's resume. He is the guy I was telling you about on
Friday as we were walking out of the building. I think he could make Enron a
lot of money.

Basil


This is helpful.  Can you also distribute the DASH system, why we use it, how
to use it, and approvals needed for deals?  Thanks.   Jeff

Brent A Price
11/09/2000 03:39 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fundamental Operating Standards

Attached for your review are the fundamental operating standards and controls
that have been developed by the Wholesale Services group.  These standards
are to be met by all Enron offices and by each functional group within the
operations process.  Qualitative standards should be viewed as the basic
measures to be taken when opening a new office or trading a new commodity.
Statistics measuring compliance with quantitative standards will be monitored
on a daily basis and any issues that arise will be addressed immediately.

As business unit heads, you play a critical role in working with Operations
to ensure that proper controls are in place and working effectively.  Please
review this document and let me know if you have any questions or wish to
discuss further.

Regards,

Brent


Attached please find the presentation that will be discussed at the Special
BSP Meeting being held on Monday, August 13, 2001.

Date:                    Monday, August 13, 2001

Time:                    9:30 AM until 1:30 PM

Location:           NYISO - Albany Office
                    290 Washington Avenue Extension
                    Albany, NY  12203

Conference Room:    WA

A Call-In Number has been set-up for those of you who are unable to attend.

Dial In Number:          (505) 242-2204

Participant Code:        756138

(See attached file: Virtual Bid 080901.ppt)

Thank you,
Denise

518-356-6184
 - Virtual Bid 080901.ppt


In order to terminate the referenced agreement we need to provide notice 180 days in advance of the end of the primary term or any annual extension.
Based upon a May 1, 1997 in service date for the Havasu facililties, the primary term of this agreement terminates on April 30, 2002. We need to provide notice by October 31, 2001 of our intent to trigger the ROFR process (see attached).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Stephanie


DAUNTE CULPEPPER

EDDIE GEORGE
ANTOINE SMITH

ANTONIO FRREMAN
PEERLESS PRICE
TONY GONZALEZ

M GRAMATICA

GIANTS DEF


Please plan to attend a meeting tomorrow, March 14 at 9 am CST in eb 749a.
Thanks Xochitl Velasco


This is a quick note to let the team know that I do have the credit worthiness requirements for PX (FERC Electric Service Tariff, Art. 2.4); a summary could be prepared if needed.   I trust that the Team would benefit from a legal opinion on Art. 2.4.5, and the associated schedule 2 of the tariff  related to "Changes in the Amount of Security Provided by a PX Participant"  which allows a refund of securities above the PX security Amount.  As Steve mentioned nicely below, if the security amount is zero, then perhaps there is an argument for a full refund.

On the same theme, I am investigating  the requirements for maintaining ESP (electricity service provider) in California.  One of the conditions is that the ESP is eligible as a participant in the CA ISO.  If the CA ISO also necessitates participant status in the PX for  some transactions, then there is a circular flow in the argument, and may be there is a need to maintain a form of relationship with the PX.

I shall keep you posted with progress.

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	CalPX Collateral Issue

Thanks Steve.  With your input, my take on Elizabeth's questions are:

1.	Must we renew the collateral?-  From a legal standpoint the answer is "No" for the reasons discussed below.  However, as we know, the PX will take a contrary position and has (along with other California parties) taken the position at FERC that the collateral should be withheld pending resolution of the CA refund case at FERC (to secure payment of refunds due).

2.	May we replace the letters of credit with cash / other collateral?-  The answer is "Yes" as you note below, with the caveat that the replacement collateral must be acceptable to the PX.  Obviously cash should be acceptable.  Perhaps a bond or negotiable instrument could be an option.

3.	What is the potential outcome if we do nothing (i.e. we don't re-up the letters of credit).  Our past experience in this regard has been that the PX will draw on the letter of credit prior to its expiration.

As for additional options, we could consider:

1. 	Further to Steve's option 1, we might try to enforce the return of the excess in court by submitting a Section 2.5 request to the PX and bringing the issue to a head.  Steve's original option is preferable, however, since it is through agreement with the PX.  Perhaps a compromise could be proposed for the PX to return our collateral over and above our highest potential refund liability to the PX in the CA refund case.

2.	Seeking injunctive relief in court to prevent the PX from drawing on the letter of credit.

Elizabeth, please advise if this answers your questions fully.

Thanks,  Ray

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	RE:

I agree.

Schedule 2, section 2 says:  "Each PX Participant shall post collateral for 100 % of its requirements in excess of the unsecured line of credit in order to participate in the CTS and Core Markets"  [I would note that (1) our "requirements" are currently zero, and (2) we do not wish, nor is it possible to "participate" in the CTS and Core Markets.  Therefore, the PX has no basis under its Tariff to continue to hold our collateral.]

As you indicated below, Schedule 2, section 2.2 says:  "Each PX Participant shall maintain sufficient collateral to cover its aggregate outstanding liabilities in the Day-Ahead and Day-Of markets to and from the PX between cash clearing cycles or during the period in which the liabilities are incurred and when payment is billed and settled."

Options:

1.  If the PX will allow us to have access to our excess cash pursuant to Section 2.5 (requests submitted by COB Wednesday will be processed by Friday), then let them cash in the LC.

2.  Ask the PX if we can substitute "other liquid collateral acceptable to the PX. .  .in lieu of cash" (Schedule 2, section 2.1.3).  We should ask them what else would be acceptable (a lien on Jeff Skilling's house?).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE:

Steve, I believe that schedule 2, section 2.2 of the CalPX tariff is the provision that requires market participants to maintain collateral, the purpose of which, however, is to provide security for liabilities incurred in the PX markets.  Since these markets are no longer in operation, there is no lawful reason to withhold the collateral, notwithstanding the assertions of CA parties that it should be used to guarantee payment of refunds ordered in the CA refund proceeding at FERC.  Ray

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:

Elizabeth, per our conversation, I am obtaining and attaching various pleadings before FERC I've worked on seeking return of the collateral and the reasons why it should not be withheld by the PX.  It's my understanding that these might help- please let me know.  There are other related filings and I will forward them as soon as I locate.  In the meantime, I am working with Steve Hall to get an independent interpretation of the PX tariff so as to yield answers to our questions and our options.  Thanks,  Ray

 << File: #150515 v1 - CPS COMMENTS ON BIRCHMAN ORDER.doc >>  << File: Answer (chargeback) EL01-36.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/07/2001
10:56 AM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 05/04/2001 10:51:44 AM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - April American Express

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Cindy K. Olson
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: April American Express
Report Total: $8,324.36
Amount Due Employee: $8,324.36

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


First Bank Plc
First Bank House
Marina Lagos

	 Urgent and confidential.

Dear Sir

I am mr Ike Michael the bills and exchange director at the first
bank of Nigeria plc, I am writing this letter to solicit for support
and assistance from you to carry out this business opportunity in my department.

Lying in an inactive account is the sum of us$30.7million belonging
to a foreign customer(mr James Kelly) who happens to be deceased.
he died with his wife and two children in a plane crash on board an ADC airline
flight at the Egirin river Lagos Nigeria in november 1996.

Ever since he died the bank has been expecting his next of kin to come and claim these fund. To this effect, we can not release the money unless someone applies for it as next of kin, as indicated in our banking guideline.

Unfortunately he has no family member in Nigeria or America who are aware of the existence of the money(as he was a contractor with the federal Republic of Nigeria).

At this juncture i have decided to do business with you in collaboration with officials that matter in the bank, to this effect we solicit your assistance in applying as the next of kin then the money will be released to you. As we do not want this money to go into the bank treasury as an unclaimed bill.

The banking law and guideline stipulates that if such money(s) remains unclaimed for a period of up to four years(5yrs) the money will be transferred into the banks treasury as an unclaimed bill.

Our request for a foreigner as next of kin is occasioned by the fact that the customer was a foreigner and a Nigerian cannot stand as next of kin.

Sir, 20% of the money will be your share as a foreign partner and your assistance to actualise this business 5% for any expenses incured.
Thereafter my partner and i will visit your country with your help once the money hits your account for disbursement according to the percentage indicated.

To effect the immediate transfer of the fund to you as agreed, you must apply first to the bank as the next of kin to the decease, then we will follow up all formalities for the transaction.

Upon receipt of your reply, i will send to you by fax or mail the text of the application, as soon as you receive the text i will further clarify you in other issues as to affect the business.

Await to hear from you

Best Regards

Ike Michael
please copy your reply to ike_michael@hotmail.com

_________________________________________________
FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community
http://www.FindLaw.com
Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!
http://mail.Justice.com


Karen,

Can you tell me when Matt Smith and Jason Wolfe are scheduled to move to new rotations?  Also what are their next assignments.  I would like to move Matt Smith into an assistant trading rotation and have Jason move in to Matt's current rotation in the fundamentals group.

Phillip


Updated plays.  I have copied both sheets on 1 page (front and back).


Trena, Tana Jones of our legal department coordinates a variety of EOL
functions.  She would like a description of the products we are planning on
rolling out in April (a bit more of a description than I can give her), and
she may have some other questions for you as well.  When you get a few
minutes, would you please call Tana at 713-853-3399 to fill her in?  thanks
-- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


Thanks for the update and keep up the good work.


Chuck:  I am currently in our Buenos Aires office for the week.  I have to
resolve our few issues when I return to Houston.  I can tell you, however,
that we cannot agree to provide you with the legal opinion as to
enforceability as we discussed in our conversation last week.  I'll follow up
with you next week.  Sara

"Charles O'Brien" <CHUCKO@statoil.com> on 02/29/2000 02:43:22 AM
To: sshackl@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Statoil ISDA

Sara,

     Just a quick note to see where we stand.  Please drop me a line when
you have a moment.

Chuck


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
24/02/2000 01:57 PM ---------------------------

Alexandre Bueno
24/02/2000 05:45 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pablo
Acevedo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernardo
Andrews/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diego
Hollweck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J
Shoobridge/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gabriela
Aguilar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rodolfo
Freyre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julian
Poole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cristian
Folgar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Calo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marta
Ortiz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis
Juarros/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Guillermo
Canovas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: CLipping 02/24/2000

BRAZIL: ANEEL'S REQUIREMENTS NOT MET BY CERJ
O Estado de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. b-8:-
 According to a report carried out by the Brazilian National Regulatory
Agency for Electricity (Aneel), the electricity company Cerj, controlled by
the companies EDP (Portugal), Endesa (Spain) and Chilectra (Chile), has met
only 53% of Aneel's requirements and 54% of Cerj's clients are being supplied
electricity at voltage levels out of quality patterns.
Eduardo Ellery, a director of the Aneel, has stated that Cerj has already
been fined R$ 1.398mn.
In addition, the Aneel informed on February 23rd 2000 other requirements to
be met by Cerj:
- providing ways for Cerj's clients to rapidly and easily contact it by
telephone or in person;
- implementing internal guidelines, procedures and criteria to prevent large
electricity supply voltage variations, aiming at avoiding damage to household
appliances and/or supply failure;
- presenting a program for goals to be accomplished related to the continuity
of electricity supply provided in the concession contract.

BRAZIL: THERMAL POWER STATIONS PROJECTS
O Estado de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. b-8:-
 On February 24th 2000, the Brazilian President of the Republic Fernando
Henrique Cardoso will sign with over-20 private companies a package of
responsibility protocols for the simultaneous construction of 49 thermal
power stations in Brazil that aim at providing additional 13,000MW energy
(the same energy currently generated by the hydro station of Itaipu, the
largest one in Brazil).
These 49 stations will demand R$ 11bn investments and they are expected to
begin operating from 2003 to supply heavy energy consumers and distribution
companies, which have already guaranteed electricity purchase.
In addition, most of these stations will be gas-fired.
Among companies involved in the construction of these stations are the
Brazilian state-owned oil company Petrobras, the companies Enron and General
Electric (US), Marubeni (Japan) and British Petroleum (UK).

BRAZIL: TUCURUI WILL BE DUPLICATED
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. A-4:-
 The Brazilian electricity company Eletronorte will close contracts with the
consortium Cetuc, on February 24th 2000, to duplicate the hydroelectric plant
of Tucurui.
The total value of the contracts is of R$ 750mn, and, by the end of 2006, the
plant will have a generation capacity of 8,400MW.
Cetuc is formed by ABB Alstom, the Brazilian Grupo Inepar and also Tenenge
Engenharia. The part of Inepar in the investment is of R$ 187mn, and, from
this amount, R$ 140mn will be used for the production of generators and
turbines by its division GE Hydro Inepar. Other division, Inepar-FEM, will
supply hydro-mechanic equipment and mounting services. ABB Alstom will supply
generators, hydraulic turbines, protection systems, supervision and control.
Tenenge will be responsible for mounting services.

BRAZIL: INFORMATION ABOUT ENERGY SOURCES
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. b-19:-
 The Energy Secretary of the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo published the
Energy Balance 1999 with information about the energy sources in the state in
1998 such as:
- energy products consumption increased by 1.6%;
- 49% of the total consumption were from oil derivatives (47% in 1990);
- 21% were from biomass (24% in 1990);
- 16% were from electricity (18% in 1990);
- 14% were from other sources like alcohol, firewood and coal;
- the state was responsible for 30.4% of the total Brazilian consumption;
- the state was responsible for 29.6% of the total Brazilian supply.

BRAZIL: CALL FOR TENDER OF GAS AREA IN SAO PAULO
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. b-5:-
 The call for the tender for the concession of Gas Sul, the 3rd gas
distribution area in the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo, will be available from
February 24th 2000 at the headquarters or at the site of the Energy Public
Services Commission (www.cspe.sp.gov.br).
These are some information about the tender:
- documents for pre-qualifying must be delivered until March 27th 2000 at
14:30;
- minimum price is R$ 95mn;
- R$ 100mn will have to be invested in the first 10 years of concession by
the new controller of the area;
- the tender is scheduled for April 26th 2000 with the opening of financial
proposals;
- on April 4th 2000 the conclusion of analysis of documents and technical
qualification is expected to be announced;
- some companies which are interested in the area are BR Distribuidora
(Brazil), Eni (Italy), EDP (Portugal), CMS (USA), Enron (USA), Total (French)
and Gas Natural (Spanish).

BRAZIL: INVESTMENTS OF ULTRAPAR IN 2000
O Estado de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. b-20:-
 R$ 195mn are expected to be invested by the Brazilian holding Ultrapar
Participacoes in 2000, including the following:
- R$ 110mn in its gas company Ultragaz, being 50% for the construction of
liquefied petroleum gas bottling units in the states of Ceara and Rio de
Janeiro and the cities of Belo Horizonte and Goiania and the remaining 50% in
its bulk distribution system expansion;
- R$ 70mn for its petrochemical company Oxiteno, with purifying capacity
expansion and quality improvement of dietene oxide.

BRAZIL: PETROBRAS' PLANS IN PETROCHEMICALS
Folha de S.Paulo, 23 Feb 2000, p. 2-3:-
 The Brazilian state-owned oil company Petrobras will not bid for the
Brazilian petrochemical complex Copene together with the Brazilian
petrochemical company Copesul nor with another company until the complex
crossed shareholdings issues are completely solved.

US: CHEVRON TO INVEST HEAVILY IN THAI VENTURE
Oil & Gas News, 24-30 Jan 2000, p.12:-
 Chevron Corp (a US oil and gas company) is allocating US$ 3.6 bn in 2000 for
its global production and exploration operations.
The company is eyeing Thailand as its core investment focus, alongside
Argentina. Thailand and Argentina will take up a lion's share of the firm's
US$ 5.2 bn exploratory and capital expenditure allotted for 2000.

ARGENTINA: PAN AMERICAN TO INVEST US$ 50MN
El Cronista Comercial, 24 Feb 2000, p. 15:-
 Pan American Energy, the Argentine-British company subsidiary of Bridas and
BP-Amoco, announced it plans to invest up to US$ 50mn to exploit 30 oil
fields in Northern Santa Cruz, in the region of Patagonia, Argentina. Over
the past week, the firm also had announced it plans to invest US$ 185mn in
the province of Chubut, in the same region, where it plans to drill 100 new
wells in the San Jorge gulf and to construct a gas compressing plant.

ARGENTINA: HUNTER MAY TAKE OVER ATALAYA
El Cronista Comercial, 24 Feb 2000, p. 15:-
 Canadian Hunter Exploration announced it may take over 78% of Atalaya Energy
for US$ 34mn in Argentina, expressing it is also interested in the
acquisition of other gas assets of Capex and Clan Energy International Fund
in this country. Capex, the Argentine oil and gas company, announced on
February 23, 2000, it has formally agreed the sale of 9.31% of Atalaya Energy
to the mentioned Canadian-based company for US$ 2.6mn. Atalaya owns 10% of
the Chihuidos gas field and of the concession of Sierra Chata exploitation
works, which is expected to produce a daily average of 145mn cubic feet of
gas per day. The overall operation may involve US$ 47mn, becoming Canadian
Hunter Exploration's first international investment.

ARGENTINA: NEW OIL BILL COMING UP
El Cronista Comercial, 24 Feb 2000, p. 6:-
 Further reductions over the current price of gasoline may only be
implemented in the mid-term, admitted Argentina's Minister of Economy, Jose
Luis Machinea during a recent meeting. The official also remarked the
Argentine government is concentrating its efforts to fix new fair competition
rules for the Argentine market, but such rules may only depend on the
sanction of a new bill which introduces changes to the current regulations
for this country's oil market. Machinea also stated the government cannot
eliminate taxes applied to the final price of gasoline because it needs such
funds to finance public spending, while he announced the government is
studying a project to encourage the use of natural gas for cars in Argentina.

BRAZIL: TOURINHO IN COUNCIL OF ELETROBRAS
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. A-4:-
 The Brazilian minister of Mining and Energy Rodolpho Tourinho will assume
the presidency of the administrative council of the electricity holding
Eletrobras.
Tourinho's mainly mission is to make the privatisation of electricity
companies faster.
Eletrobras controls the companies Furnas, Centrais Eletricas do Norte
(Eletronorte) and Companhia Hidreletrica do Sao Francisco (Chesf).

BRAZIL: FGTS IN ELECTRICITY PRIVATISATION?
Folha de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. 2-2:-
 Georges Lamaziere, the spokesman of the Brazilian president Fernando
Henrique Cardoso, informed on February 23rd 2000 that the Brazilian Minister
of Mining and Energy, Rodolpho Tourinho, is analysing a possible use of funds
from FGTS (Government Severance Indemnity Fund for Employees) in the
privatisation of the electricity sector.

SOUTHERN/CENTRAL AMERICA: IBERDROLA'S PLANS
La Gaceta de los Negocios, 23 Feb 2000, p.16:-
 Spanish electricity operator Iberdrola has decided to focus its expansion
plan on Southern and Central America, particularly in Brazil and Mexico.
In this sense, in Brazil it assigned Pta 170,000mn to acquire Cepme,
electricity operator active in the region of Pernambuco; while in Mexico, it
will allocate Pta 40,000mn to build a combined cycle power station in
Monterey.
Additional Pta 80,000mn will be invested by Iberdrola in a four-year term, in
order to improve capacity of its gas and electricity subsidiaries placed in
Southern and Central America, as well as to acquire other firms of this
region.
Currently, Iberdrola totals in this area 6.5mn clients (on 15mn total
clients), which consume nearly 22,400 gigawatts per hour, representing 26.5%
of whole production of the Spanish operator.

BRAZIL: ENERGY ECONOMY WITH DST
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. A-4:-
 According to the Brazilian Ministry of Mining and Energy, the inter-linked
electricity system South-Southeast-Centre-West saved 2,154MW with the
daylight saving time (DST), adopted since October 3rd 1999.
Only in the South and Centre-West regions, the reduction was of 2,026 MWh. In
the North-east region, the DST was responsible for a reduction in the demand
by 2.3%. In the South region, it was by 5.7%.

BRAZIL: INVESTMENTS OF PETROBRAS DISTRIBUIDORA
Folha de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. 2-4:-
 The Brazilian fuels distribution company Petrobras Distribuidora (BR)
informed on February 23rd 2000 that the company plans to invest US$ 1bn with
its owns funds by 2005, being R$ 300mn in 2000 mainly to continue with its
petrol stations modernisation and to open new stations for vehicle gas.

BRAZIL: MANGUINHOS WILL ENLARGE PLANT
Gazeta Mercantil, 24 Feb 2000, p. A-4:-
 The Brazilian Oil Refinery of Manguinhos will probably begin the works to
increase its plant based in the North Zone of the city of Rio de Janeiro by
the end of 2000.
The predicted amount to be invested is of US$ 65mn, and the refining capacity
will be increased from 12,500 to 32,000bopd.
In this plant, will also be constructed 40 tanks to stock crude oil and oil
derivatives. A maritime transport base will be constructed in the Guanabara
Bay, which is near the plant.

BRAZIL/ARGENTINA: PETROBRAS/REPSOL'S NEGOTIATION
Jornal do Commercio, 24 Feb 2000, p. a-16:-
 The president of the Brazilian state-owned oil company Petrobras, Henri
Philippe Reichstul, informed on February 23rd 2000 that he is analysing the
following proposal made by the Spanish company Repsol: Repsol would exchange
part of the derivatives distribution network of its Argentine company YPF
with the refinery Refap of Petrobras in the city of Canoas (state of Rio
Grande do Sul).

ARGENTINA: BB+ RISK RATING FOR METROGAS
Buenos Aires Economico, 24 Feb 2000, p. 5:-
 Argentine gas company MetroGas has received a BB+ rating for its foreign
currency debt from risk rating agency Fitch IBCA, relating to medium-term
bonds of US$ 282.5mn and a medium-term notes programme of US$ 600mn. MetroGas
is 70% owned by Gas Argentino, in turn 54.7% controlled by British Gas.

ARGENTINA: NATURAL GAS POWERED CARS
Gazeta Mercantil Latinoamericana, 20 Feb 2000, p.13:-
 With gasoline prices skyrocketing all over the world, alternative fuels have
been put back on the agenda, and many Argentines are looking to compressed
natural gas as a solution to reduce fuel consumption and costs. The number of
converted vehicles in the country has grown 9 times since 1994, reaching over
489,000 vehicles in 1999. Argentina is the country with the most natural gas
powered cars in the world where it is estimated that over 1.3mn gas powered
cars exist. Over 3000 vehicles per month are converted to natural gas and
over 800 service stations in 144 cities offer it in Argentina. Of the 489,000
units, 71.2% are used by private citizens and 10% by taxis. Natural gas
engines are environmentally friendly and wear out engines less than regular
gasoline. The savings in fuel consumption can be as high as 70% compared to
gasoline, making the engine conversion investment amortizable in only 9
months or 25,000 km. Car maker, Fiat is the only company to produce natural
gas models in Argentina direct from th
e factory, without the need to convert the models later.

BRAZIL: CHANGES IN ESTIMATE FOR OIL ACCOUNT
Folha de S.Paulo, 24 Feb 2000, p. 2-1/2-4:-
 The Brazilian oil account was expected to help the Brazilian fiscal
adjustment in 2000 (R$ 36.77bn) with R$ 3.5bn.
But with the higher international oil prices, the Brazilian Minister of
Mining and Energy, Rodolpho Tourinho, informed on February 23rd 2000 that the
estimate for the oil account result in 2000 is being calculated again.
According to the Budget Commission of the Brazilian Congress, the federal
government will have only R$ 1.5bn from the oil account in 2000, based on the
following scenario: oil price between US$ 23 and US$ 25/barrel, dollar rate
of R$ 1.85 and no price readjustment for consumers.

ARGENTINA: DIESEL FUEL PRICE RISE DENOUNCED
Buenos Aires Economico, 24 Feb 2000, p. 2:-
 The four associations representing road passenger transport companies in
Argentina have announced that they will present formal complaints against oil
companies for the recent rises in diesel prices, totalling 61% since July
1999 in comparison with a 37% rise in world oil prices. The companies plan to
present complaints both to the courts and to the National Competition Defence
Commission over the increase, which has resulted in an additional cost of US$
150mn to passenger transport companies.
The sector has also announced that bus services between the hours of 23.00
and 4.00 will soon be cut off, due to the crisis affecting the sector, while
daytime services will be reduced up to 10%. These measures will result in the
loss of up to 5,000 jobs, according to sector chamber CETAP.
The urban passenger transport sector is now also faced with losses of some
US$ 400mn annually due to competition from illegal mini-cab companies, as
well as unpaid debts of some US$ 800mn arising from the liquidation of former
state reinsurance company INDER. A 1997 decree which suspended lawsuits for
accidents as a result of the emergency faced by the sector will expire on 31
March, and companies fear a wave of lawsuits thereafter.


Virendra,

Here are the book ids and post ids of the three books that we are having to
manually override each night.  These books are all set up in RiskTrac and are
officialized in Portcalc.

BOOK ID   11/09/00 POST ID

INTRA-NORTHEAST-BAS 941776

INTRA-CNT-GULF-PHY 941701

INTRA-CNT-GULF2-PHY 941767

If you need any more information let me know.  Thanks for your help.

Robin
x57478


Fiona,
?
Thanks for your message and the update.? We haven't made  any changes.? I was
referring to the Enron changes, and the electronic  brochure I sent to you
yesterday.? In total, we have the following pieces  which list the Enron name:
?
-? Book cover
-? Bios which are on the cover and in the "Preface"  section of the book
-? Chapter 3 which was written by Vince Kaminski's  group
-? Electronic brochure
?
The first 3 pieces are the most important since they have to  do with the
printing of the book.? If you could?get the modifications  to us by Thursday,
that would be great.?
?
Thanks, and look forward to hearing from you.
?
Julie
?


This is going out to the complete distribution.  This report includes some March and April dates.  The report that I will send out this afternoon will only include the data for the close month of February.  If you have any questions you can contact me at 713-345-2984.

Thanks
Robin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panzer, Robin
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:46 PM
To:	Anderson, Gary E.; Stern, Ellis; Klimesh, Steve
Subject:	PGAS Chart Label Check In

Attached is the PGAS Chart Label Check In for 3/5/02.  If I need to be sending this to someone else please let me know.

Thanks
Robin


Attached are clean and marked copies of the termsheet and letter of
interest.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or
questions.


Jeff:

Thanks for your attention on this matter. I am leaving for China tomorrow
(Saturday 6/9) and will return on Saturday 6/16. I am confirmed to depart for
Sao Paulo on 6/19. Is there a phone # I can reach Joe Kaischkill on? If so, I
would contact him when I get settled in in Shanghai. On the contrary, I can
be reached on Monday 6/18 in my office in Miami at 305-443-6665 or on my
mobile 305-773-0319.

Thanks again for your help.

Best regards,
Joe Alcantara

On Fri, 08 June 2001, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

>
>
> Joe:
>
> You can expect a call from Joe Kaischkill about setting up a meeting in Sao
> Paolo to discuss your proposal.  Let me know if there's anything else that
> I can do to help.
>
> All the best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>                     mail@joesdesk
>                     .com                 To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
>                                          Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     06/04/2001           cc:
>                     03:30 PM             Subject:     Brazil
opportunity-completed
>                                          one-pager
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
> I did a final draft of the one-pager I sent you earlier. I am attaching it
> here as it communicates the idea better. Please send along to whomever you
> feel should recieve it and let me know when I can contact who & when. I
> will be traveling on Friday am for 1 week.
> Thank you.
> Joe Alcantara
>
>
>
> (See attached file: DearJeffreyIII.doc)


Hi Jeff and Barbara,

I would really like to stay where I am, if possible.  I like being close to
Suzanne, not to mention the good neighbors and the benefit of facing the wall.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 05:02
PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/10/2000 02:25 PM
To: Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect,
Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Construction Schedule - Office Moves

Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The current phase
of the office construction process is almost finished.  We have been given a
completion date when (we hope) your new office will be ready of Monday,
November 20.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.


FYI.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/18/2000 10:19 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Gonzales@ECT, Les Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Phil
DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re:

My view on the discussions with Southern Co. is that it is one of several
potential ways to get at some upside out of our rights at Elba Island.  It's
also giving us a good indication of where the market is for gas sourced from
LNG coming in to Elba.  Nothing will be committed to without considering all
the alternatives at Elba and a full review within EGM and asumably ENA.  The
discussions are still, in my view, exploratory.

Thanks

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman @ ECT                           12/14/2000 08:17 AM

To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Doug
Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Les
Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Before we sign ANYTHING with Southern about the Elba volumes, I'd like an
update.  Also I want to make sure we aren't trading anything away at Elba
that we could be talking about elsewhere.  Thanks.

Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
09/15/2000 02:31 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Polan Trip - September 20th

Vince:

Here is the itinerary from the travel agency and I am also attaching the one
I create.

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Catherine Elder <catherine.elder@travelpark.com> on 09/15/2000 11:01:07 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: W. Kaminski 20-26sep

                                                   SALES AGT: CE/YGOBD8

                                          KAMINSKI/WINCENTY
                                          EB 1962

  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  SEP 15 2000

DATE  SERVICE               FROM               TO

AIR FRANCE            20SEP HOUSTON TX     PARIS          415P    845A
AF 33      Y          WED   G.BUSH INTERCO CHARLES DE GAU         21SEP
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL D     TERMINAL 2C
                            MEAL/BREAKFAST                NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         9:30 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A340-300
                            SEAT 24A NO SMOKING CONFIRMED KAMINSKI/WINCEN

AIR FRANCE            21SEP PARIS          WARSAW         935A    1150A
AF 2046    Y          THU   CHARLES DE GAU OKECIE
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 2B    TERMINAL 1
                            BREAKFAST                     NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: AIRBUS INDUSTRIE A319.

HOTEL                 25SEP VICTORIA INTERCONTINENTAL
                      26SEP KROLEWSKA 11
                            WARSAW, 00 065
                            POLAND
                            TELEPHONE: 48-22 6578011
                            FAX: 48-22-6578057
                            CONFIRMATION: 1504592
                            SINGLE ROOM
                            RATE: ENR DEM 310.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            HOLD POLICY: 6PM
                            ENRON CORP NON SMOKING KING

AIR FRANCE            26SEP WARSAW         PARIS          810A    1035A
AF 1447    Y          TUE   OKECIE         CHARLES DE GAU
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 1     TERMINAL 2B
                            BREAKFAST                     NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:25 DURATION
 LO 0331                    FLIGHT OPERATED BY LO LOT POLISH AIRLINES
            AIRCRAFT OWNER: LO  LOT POLISH AIRLINES
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737 ALL 100-800 SERIES PSGR

AIR FRANCE            26SEP PARIS          HOUSTON TX     1255P   425P
AF 34      Y          TUE   CHARLES DE GAU G.BUSH INTERCO
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL 2C    TERMINAL D
                            MEAL/SNACK                    NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         10:30 DURATION
 CO 0011                    FLIGHT OPERATED BY CO CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
            AIRCRAFT OWNER: CO  CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 777-200/300
                            SEAT 37A NO SMOKING CONFIRMED KAMINSKI/WINCEN

MISCELLANEOUS         25NOV HOUSTON TX
                      SAT   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  AF/2BGHRB

KAMINSKI/WINCENTY  S0C0011R1000

SHIRLEY CRENSHAW: 853-5290
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS: IN U.S 800 523-6586/INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*******************************************
AIR FARE $1714.18
PLEASE NOTE ENRON CHARGES A $50.00 SERVICE FEE FOR PERSONAL
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL


Is the Baja for April transport in sitara?  Please let me know.

Thanks,
MIke


The approval process initiated in 1998 for all meeting and event expenditures
in excess of $5,000 has enabled ENA to better assess the business value of
events, accurately track our activities and save money.  These events include
customer and employee meetings, and trade shows.

ENA has made some modifications to the process, which are described in this
memo.

The $5,000 threshold remains in effect for all customer events.  However, the
threshold for approval for employee meetings and events has been lowered to
$2,000, and some additional requirements must be met prior to approval.

Please be sure to follow the procedures described below for all meetings and
events, so we can continue to successfully manage these events.

1) Prior to making any commitments to customers or vendors, all customer
events with anticipated costs in excess of $5,000, and all employee events
with anticipated costs in excess of $2,000 must be reviewed by the ENA Public
Relations (PR) department and approved by the ENA Office of the Chairman

2) The PR department will handle the site search and hotel contract
negotiations for all such events.  Once this is completed, the PR department
will work with you to plan and produce your event in its entirety; or they
can provide as much or as little assistance as you require. The PR department
will be responsible for helping you achieve the best value for your program
and ENA.

3) A completed expenditure request form (see attached) and supporting
documentation is required for each event.  Employee meetings require a
detailed agenda as part of the event documentation prior to approval.  Please
submit the completed expenditure request form and documentation to the PR
department at EB 3642, or work with PR department employees to complete the
form.

4) After PR review, the expenditure will be submitted to the ENA Office of
the Chairman for final approval.

Additionally, the PR department can assist in the procurement of tickets for
various local sporting events and concerts.

If you have any questions regarding this process, would like assistance
planning an event, or need tickets for a Houston event, please contact Dorie
Hitchcock in the PR department at (713) 853-6978.

Thank you for your cooperation.


Oh, I guess the cost difference is not as great as I thought, but still about $700 per month more.  Do I need to run that by Jim to see if that is a deal breaker?  I will try to work on them at St. Dominic's but since they are just starting to open up this new wing they will probably be unwilling to deal.  I told Anne Rubio from St. Dominic's Center that you would be calling.  Her number is 713-741-8718.

My sense is that transportation to Symphony, AD Players, UH Chapel and lunch with Marshall Doyle will still be an issue that will have to handled outstide of St. Dominic's.  Their transportation is for shopping, group activities and doctor visits.  I want to follow up with additional questions on this subject, but that is my opinion at this point.  I have other questions for Anne as well so I will be in contact with her in the next several days.

Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: Bassani, Margaret M SOPC
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:05 AM
To: 'Lyne Martin'
Subject: RE: St. Dominic's

Tom,

Thank you so much for handling this!  I did call Mom last night around 9:00 shortly before going to bed.  She did seem very happy with St. Dominic's Center.  Yes, the cost at Edenbrook is less than St. Dominic's Center...It costs $3500 + $750 for extra person...totally $4250/month. Bear in mind, this is for the two room living quarter, not a one room quarter with a connector door for another room.  Its probably St. Dominic's way of making money on the married couple!  I think that Mom and Dad's Long term Care Insurance covers at least $100/day if not a little more.  So this should help.  I hope to have an extra hour or two this Friday afternoon, perhaps to see the facilities myself. My big push at work should be over on Thursday afternoon.

I guess, I really don't care if it costs more to get Mom and Dad into an assisted living facility.  I just want to make sure it provides all the care that other facilities provide.

Love, Margaret

-----Original Message-----
From: Lyne Martin [mailto:lynemartin@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:43 PM
To: Margaret Bassani
Subject: St. Dominics
Margaret,

Mom, Dad and I had a nice visit to St. Dominic's Center.  It is full service retirement facility with independent living, assisted living and nursing/special care (including dementia).  As you expected it is not as luxurious as Edenbrook but it has good facilities and services, and most importantly both Mom and Dad like it.

I have several follow up questions based on reading their material and discussions today.  The biggest issue seems to be cost.  A one room suite is $80/day (approx. $2480/month) for assisted living which is good but the size is too small.  St. Dominics does not have two room units.  Mom and Dad can have two ajoining rooms which will give them lots of room but they will be charged the daily rate for each room or approx. $4960/month.  It does not seem right to me that they charge the full rate for two rooms since the service requirements for Mom and Dad is the same either way.  I understand they need to get value for the second room but 100% seems steep.  Lyne says that she and her mom encountered the same thought process with Lyne's grandmother when she wanted a private room versus a semiprivate room in a nursing care facility here in Houston.

Didn't you say that Edenbrook was about $4000/month for the two of them?

The other problem I see is that Dad seems to think he will have his car there.  Oh brother!!!!

I will give you a call after things slow down for you at work; will later this week be good for you?

Tom

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 04:33 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/27/2000 01:38 AM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 235445@mailman.enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Electric Restructuring: Two Utilities In California Suffer Under
Deregulation --- Wholesale ...

The Wall Street Journal Europe
Two Utilities In California Suffer Under Deregulation --- Wholesale Power
Costs Them More Than They Can Charge
By Rebecca Smith
?
09/27/2000
The Wall Street Journal Europe
8
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)

California's two biggest utilities are losing so much money buying
electricity in the state's deregulated market that they've run up deficits
equivalent to half their net worth in just four months.

If the cost of wholesale power continues to exceed the price utilities are
allowed to bill their customers, it's conceivable they could become
technically insolvent sometime next year, putting pressure on regulators to
orchestrate a multibillion-dollar public bailout.

Such a scenario is quietly being discussed by bond rating agencies that
recently reduced their credit outlooks for Pacific Gas and Electric Co., a
unit of San Francisco-based PGOCorp., and Southern California Edison, a unit
of Edison International of Rosemead, California. Bond rating agencies say
they're not sure how much additional debt can be borne by the two affected
utilities before they'll have difficulty paying their bills.

"If this is just a seasonal aberration, the utilities can get through it,"
says Lori Woodland, analyst for Fitch IBCA "If it goes on for six or nine
months, it's a very serious situation."

A.J. Sabatelle, senior credit officer at Moody's Investors Service, said, "At
some point, you have a financial crisis."

The utilities say they're having no difficulty meeting expenses and don't
envision problems in servicing their debts. But they're vigorously lobbying
state and federal regulators to change the rules of the game, hoping to
somehow charge their customers for the shortfall. As such, California's
experience may be a harbinger of what could happen in other states where
wholesale power prices have surpassed the amount utilities are allowed to
charge their rate payers.

Today's situation represents a complete turnabout from what was expected when
California deregulated its energy market on March 31, 1998. California tried
to give its utilities a competitive edge nationally by deregulating faster
than other states and by creating a mechanism to allow investor-owned
utilities, like PGOand Edison, to quickly pay down debts incurred to serve
customers under the old regulatory system.

To do this, the state legislature set rates at high levels, which, at first
generated fat surpluses. As the money piled up, utilities used it to pay down
debts for generation facilities that looked like they would be unprofitable
in the new deregulated world. By the end of June, PGO and Edison together had
collected more than $12 billion (13.75 billion euros) and were on track to
finish paying down debts well ahead of the March 31, 2002, deadline set by
the legislature. At that point, rate freezes were to end and retail prices
were to fluctuate with the market.

But all that went out the window in June when wholesale power prices surged.
Average prices at state-sanctioned energy markets were four to five times the
prices a year earlier and three to four times the level utilities could
charge customers.

The cash-burn rate has been so enormous at PG&E, which serves one in 20
Americans, that analysts expect its undercollection to exceed $3 billion --
half its shareholder equity of $5.7 billion -- by the end of October.
Southern California Edison finished August with a deficit of $2 billion,
equivalent to two-thirds of its net worth of $3.2 billion.

That leaves utilities in a bind. They want to end the rate freeze to be able
to pass on the real cost of electricity to consumers. But as soon as the
freeze ends, they get clobbered. That's because they'll immediately have to
book a loss on their power-purchase deficits. What's more, they can't use the
proceeds from power plant sales to cover those losses; instead, with the
freeze ending, they'll be obliged to refund that money to ratepayers. In
PG&E's case, the refunds could total $500 million, while in Edison's case,
the amount is $254 million.

Publicly at least, utility executives insist that a mechanism will be found
to let them recoup the money spent on electricity. But that assumes
politicians will be willing to change a law that protects ratepayers from
this expense.

Consumer advocates are gearing up for the fight. Nettie Hoge, executive
director for San Francisco consumer group the Utility Reform Network, says
ratepayers shouldn't end up footing the bill for a deal cut by utilities that
benefited them before prices shot up. "Our heart bleeds for the utilities,
but they have more power to get the wholesale market fixed than we do," she
says.

Utility executives are now distancing themselves from the legislation that
got them into such a mess, which was drafted with their assistance.
PGOChairman Robert Glynn says it's best not to "overanalyze" the "old deal."
Instead, he says, regulators and legislators should sit down with utilities
and construct a new agreement as "it's in the broad interests of the state
not to have critical energy infrastructure look like a leper."

Mr. Glynn says the current deal offers "mutually assured destruction" to both
utilities and ratepayers. Something must be done, he says, or consumers
throughout most of the state will experience "a San Diego-style rate shock."
The utility serving that city, San Diego Gas and Electric Co., ended its
freeze a year ago and began passing wholesale power costs directly through to
ratepayers. Legislators intervened this summer, however, and temporarily
capped retail rates when monthly power bills nearly tripled. As a result, San
Diego Gas and Electric, a unit of Sempra Energy, also is accumulating a
deficit.

Folder Name: Electric Restructuring
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 47

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Please send me a few recommended B&Bs and restaurants.  Thanks for your help.

Kevin

My email at home is kruscitti@aol.com (I think).


<http://www.match.com/>
more matches for you from Venus, the Goddess of Love

Hello, it's me again, Venus! Today I've got a little friendly advice:
Stop being a couch potato of love, get proactive and focus on these
fabulous matches I've been sending you! It's time to get serious about
romance!

Go ahead. Contact these 10 members I found for you today!

HOT6900CRAZY
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=48474349494D4F&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>    Check out my photo!
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=48474349494D4F&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
100% sexy, smart and fun
I am a very passionate person, that would be the ultimate word to
describe me. I am very passionate especially about the people I care for
and things I truly enjoy. I am a big dreamer, want many things out of
life that may seem impossible. I like to think
( Denver, CO , US )

rurublazer
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=494444454E4B48&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>    Check out my photo!
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=494444454E4B48&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
Seeking fun, adventure and friendship
In today's world the phrase "Live today like there is no tomorrow" takes
on a whole new meaning. I'm a person who believes in living each day to
the fullest. Laughter, adventure, fun are all pieces to the puzzle. I'm
a very independent woman who likes my
( Golden, CO , US )

Alexis1019
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=49444449454A50&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>    Check out my photo!
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=49444449454A50&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
Single again, looking for someone to share a cup of coffee with...
I am attractive, charming, generous, hardworking, honest, passionate and
sincere however I could be critical, demanding and also vulnerable at
times. So, if you could handle my possitive side as well as my negative
side, e-mail me.
( Aurora, CO , US )

bldrgirl816
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=464744464D4D4C&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>    Check out my photo!
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=464744464D4D4C&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
I lost the bet!!
I would have to say that I am a lover of life! I spend a lot of time
with my friends and volunteering for a local Fire Department. I love
sports! Skiing in the winter and hiking and biking in the Summer. I
recently took up the sport of golf- frustrating l
( Boulder, CO , US )

movie30
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=48434A44454C49&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>    Check out my photo!
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=48434A44454C49&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
The best part of life's journey is the people you meet along the way.
Let's see some of my favorite activities..definitely spending time with
friends. Whether that's out for dinner and then spending the rest of the
night out on the town, going up to the mountains or taking trips. There
are also times when a quiet night at h
( Denver, CO , US )

kim3511
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=494449474A4C49&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
TRUST ME....I AM WORTH IT
Positive, Enthusiastic, Athletic, High Energy and Confidant best
describe what I am looking for and who I am. Love to spend any free time
with my friends..that is on a limited basis. I use my time wisely and
enjoy every minute! I previously lived for work
( Broomfield, CO , US )

Amee123
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=494448484B4947&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
Single and looking for someone to spend quality time together
I like driving in the mountains. I live in Colorado so there is lots of
fun stuff to do such as snow mobiling, i work out , hot tubing, sipping
wine, I just like to have fun in the outdoors. I love to go to plays and
musicals and dine out in quaint and qu
( Denver, CO , US )

ILLTTF
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=484B494B454F48&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
Fun loving, happy, intelligent girl seeking soul/playmate!
Hi! My friend's have described me as cute, intelligent, fun loving,
outgoing, happy, easily amused, intuitive etc...etc...! I love to read,
hike, ski, hang out w/good friend's eating good food & drinking good
wine! I love to laugh & I love being around
( Denver, CO , US )

divasparkles
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=4944454D47464A&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
Fun, spontaneous girl with a great smile
I am too much fun. Laughing is my thing. I love to go experience the
spice of life and yet the simple pleasures in life also fulfill me. I am
carefree and enjoy someone who has a great sense of humor, a man
searching for a zest filled life and can make me
( Arvada, CO , US )

12435
<http://www.match.com/venus/showprofile.asp?userid=474749454C4949&Tracki
ngID=65685&BannerID=507514&Supmsg=1>
single mom seeks fun and love
hi,well my friends describe me as the life of the party.i like to go out
and have fun.i am seeking a man that would like to go out and have some
fun. i like to go out to dinner,to the movies,listen to music and watch
the people around me,or if i am with s
( Broomfield, CO , US )

Log in to see even more matches! <http://www.match.com/>

P.S. If you're not getting the kind of matches you want, just let me
know by logging in at http://www.match.com/venus/venus.asp
<http://www.match.com/venus/venus.asp?supmsg=1>  and editing the About
My Match section of your profile.


Ok, I'll tell you what I've told everyone else - the pledges Jeff has
received range from $20 to $6000.  So, pledge with your heart, keeping your
pocketbook in mind!  By the way, Jeff finished the ride in just over 14
hours!  SRS

Kevin Hannon @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 04/20/2001 01:56:56 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

No matter how much I have, its never enough.

Kevin

	Jeff Skilling@ENRON
	Sent by: Sherri Sera@ENRON
	04/20/01 10:45 AM

		 To: Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

How much to you have?!  SRS

Kevin Hannon @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 04/20/2001 08:03:14 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

OK Sherri how much do you want?

Kevin

	Jeff Skilling@ENRON
	Sent by: Sherri Sera@ENRON
	04/19/01 05:18 PM

		 To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT, Michael Brown/NA/Enron, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet
R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

I know how incredibly busy you all are, so I'm sure that making a pledge to
Jeff for the MS150 has simply slipped your mind.  Well the ride is this
weekend, time is running out and we need you!

Enron's goal is to raise $700,000, and Jeff's personal goal is to raise
$50,000.  As of today, we are a little better than half way there.  Won't you
consider helping him reach his goal?

Thanks for your consideration.  I look forward to hearing from you tomorrow...

Sherri :-)


Hey Sweetie,

Wazzup!  Get up, Get Down, Get Funky, Get Loose!  I see that you are already
on the internet.  Send me something CUTE.

Love,

Mom


Hi

Sorry to hear about being SICK - the only good there is re-experiencing the
pure joy of being merely healthy.  After that nothing bad matters.  Would
love to see you sometime - maybe next week lunch?  The Heights is still grand
... too me.  Come by or call anytime.  Address  822 Columbia (on Columbia
between 8th and 9th) Phne 713 8644023.

See ya
Elizabeth


Tonight Kris and I met with the SAP team about the critical issues we
discussed in the meeting this morning.

As far as Xref1 (coordinator) and Xref2 (physical vs. financial flag) fields
go, it appears that we are getting what we have to have in order to go live
7/1.  Rena was working on a spec (the OSS that was discussed) that would
automatically populate these 2 fields.  However, the test was unsuccessful.
These two fields are being opened up for netting, so we can input them
manually when netting.  I believe we need to pursue the auto fill post 7/1,
but the first priority is having a place to put the data.

As far as settlement period is concerned, we are probably going to get a
hybrid of what we want at this time.  The SAP team does appear to have
appropriate resources working on this issue.  For data created in SAP, I am
more comfortable that the data is being captured on the income statement side
of the entry, and the SAP folks now seem to think they can link over to it to
get the settlement data.  For data converted, we will not be able to get the
settlement period in the same manner.  The offsetting entry in conversion is
to a dummy conversion account rather than an income statement account.  The
dummy account doesn't carry the settlement date.  Another issue is related to
the indicator to let us know if an invoice has had cash applied or


Guys need your guidance asap! I'm leaning toward showing list informally but saying we don't think they can act on it given that we have to sever these guys regardless.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea.Lang@dynegy.com [mailto:Andrea.Lang@dynegy.com]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Oxley, David
Subject: RE:

David
my legal guys do not have any problem with looking at the potential list of
your employees - the key is that should we hire any of these you will need
to sign a waiver that you agree for us to hire them.  when can we get
together on this

Andrea Lang
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Dynegy Inc.
713-507-6578
andrea.lang@dynegy.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:11 PM
To:	May, Larry
Cc:	Arnold, John; Issler, Paulo; Barkley, Tom; Lu, Zimin; Maggi, Mike; Moon, Eric; Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	OStrip Function

As you know, the Ostrip Functionality has been altered.  This change has affected the way the larryoptmodel values the gas daily options.  The reason the larryoptmodel is affected is because the larryoptmodel was defining the inputs to the Ostrip model differently than the documentation asked.  Let me explain.  The Ostrip Model has the following date inputs:

NowToSet 	- Fixed Price = zero
		- Forward Start = days from now until strike is set

BegDays	- Fixed Price = days from now until start of option
		- Forward Start = days from when strike is set until start of option

EndDays	- Fixed Price = days from now until end of option
		- Forward Start = days from when strike is set until end of option

FwdStFlag	- Fixed Price = 0
		- Forward Start = 1

The Ostrip model should overlook the NowToSet days if the FwdStFlag = 0 (fixed price option).  It assumes the option is set right now.  The "Old Ostrip Model" did not overlook this input.  This is the problem.  In Larryoptmodel, the NowToSet is the same for Fixed Price options and Forward Start Options, the BegDays is the same and the EndDays is the same.  Thus when the "Old Ostrip Model" incorrectly used the NowToSet days, this made the Larryoptmodel value the option correctly.  When the "New Ostrip Model" was put into production, this model overlooks the NowToSet date, thus giving an incorrect value in Larryoptmodel.

Larryoptmodel has to be changed to reflect the above inputs.  It is actually only a change to one date.  This date will be used in calculating the three days above.  If the option is a fixed price option then the date will be today and NowToSet will be Today minus Today (zero), BegDays will be Start of Option minus today, EndDays will be End of Option minus today.  If the option is a forward start option, then the date will be when the strike is set and the NowToSet with be the strike setting date minus today, BegDays will be Start of Option minus the strike date, EndDays will be the End of Option minus strike date.

It is important to note that it is unexcusable to make any changes to the models without consulting the traders first.  If there was a problem with the "Old Ostrip Model" then the trader should have been notified right away.  This could have meant that the options were being misvalued when trading.  In this case, however, Larry had figured a way around this problem and he was valuing correctly.  When the model was changed, that changed the larryoptmodel valuation and now it was being valued incorrectly.  Either way, any problems with the models should be communicated with the traders right away.  Any changes to the models should be communicated to the traders before they are made.

Please let me know if any have any questions or concerns.  Thanks.

John


that isn't snoring, that is the sound of my teeth chattering b/c i have no covers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:07 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

how would you know, you always fall asleep in like 2 seconds.  you are the
one who snores.  very annoying.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:57 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i am tired.  you snore.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:02 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   it's not going to zero.  you need to think more positively.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:25 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   it is going to zero

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:41 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      nice.  i just talked to fayez and he said it will be up next week.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:33 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      13 days straight.  it is trading just over $11.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:23 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

          all the stocks are down, not just enron.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:00 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject:

         the enron stock is down again.  13 days in a row.

   **********************************************************************
         This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
      affiliate
         and
         may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
   of
      the
         intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
   disclosure
      by
         others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
   recipient
      (or
         authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
   sender
      or
         reply
         to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
         all
         copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
   are
      not
         intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
      evidence
         a
         binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
   its
         affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
      not
         be
         relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
      otherwise.
         Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Alex,

No problem.

Vince

Alex Huang@ENRON
01/11/2001 05:12 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Real Option Conference

Vince,
I was brought to my attention that an interesting Real Option conference
is taking place in March 27-28. I would like to attend this conference
if possible.

Thanks.
Alex


Attached is the latest version of the Enron North America Legal phone list.
Please advise is any further revisions are required.


FYI

While I have been periodically giving updates on the above max rate capacity release activity, I was surprised by the magnitude of the PG&E value above max. rates.
For the 12 months ended 9/30/01 we had net cash payments to PG&E.  (approx $18 mil revenues to Cal.  + $5.6 revenue on San Juan - $28 million in above max rate capacity release activity = ($4.4) million


har-dee-har-har.  I mean, will we be celebrating in some fashion.  I'm
scheduled to go to Houston--I'm not kidding--but if there's something
planned, which I assume there is, then I'm going to cancel my trip to
Houston, like pronto.

Ironically,
Jeff

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	02/27/2001 07:09 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: FW: Sonoma Coast Viticulture contact

cooking!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: Re: FW: Sonoma Coast Viticulture contact

You are so sweet.  Thanks so much.  What's new?  What are we doing on the
Friday of Eldon's b-day?

                    Nancy
Sellers
                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Jeff
Dasovich'"
                    ndavi.com>
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>

cc:
                    02/27/2001 07:06 PM            Subject:     FW: Sonoma
Coast Viticulture contact

Finally - here is the name of the contact

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Patrick DeLong
Sent:   Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:58 PM
To:     Nancy Sellers
Subject:        Sonoma Coast Viticulture contact

Nancy, sorry this took a while, but it will be worth it.  If anybody knows
about the Sonoma Coast, it's this guy.  He's done work with Flowers,
Kistler, etc. out there.  His name is Greg Bjornstad (sp.?) and his number
is (707) 829-1687.  He doesn't really know me from a hole in the ground but
you can "double reference" my name as Todd Graff's friend.  Todd is the
winemaker at Sonoma Creek and is a good friend of mine who worked with Eric
on some projects.


I have attached the 1998 Final exam, this time with answers.
 - 98fqa.pdf

    Jonathan Leonard
    Professor

tel: 510-642-7048  545 Student Services Building, #1900
fax: 510-642-4700  Haas School of Business
    University of California
    Berkeley, CA.  94720-1900


ok with me


I don't know much but I think Dan Lyons is well versed on this.  Also maybe
Dale R in Portland.  Hope all is well.


Thank You, so very much for the Gift Basket, it is beautiful,  I will share
with the group.

Happy, Happy, Holiday's!

Dolores Sustaita & Move-Team