Did you know that a $35 donation enhances the social functioning and language
skill of 10 low-income, elderly individuals who are primarily non-English
speaking Chinese residents?  United Way funds several programs at the Chinese
Service Center, including senior services that help Chinese elders access and
use community resources to receive needed support.  It is one of many United
Way -funded agencies that provide this type of service.

A have exists in Southeast Portland for Chinese-American and
Vietnamese-American residents seeking to adapt to life in a new country while
maintaining ties to their rich cultural heritage.  The United Way-funded
Chinese Service Center provides older immigrants with ethnic meals, English
lessons, tai chi instruction, tips for adapting to life in the United States
and much more.  Shyness and language barriers prevent many elderly Asians
from obtaining the services they need, whether it is something as essential
as proper health care or something as basic as assistance with their grocery
shopping.

The Chinese Service Center has expanded its services to meet increasing needs
since it opened in 1983.  Soon, they hope to open a branch office in
Beaverton to serve a growing Asian population there.

United Way Partner Agencies - Senior Independence

Chinese Service Center
Columbia River Mental Health Services
Friendly House, Inc.
Linnton Community Center
Neighborhood House, Inc.
Northwest Pilot Project, Inc.
The Salvation Army, Cascade Division
Senior Citizens Council of Clackamas County
Urban League of Portland
Volunteers of America
YWCA of Portland


Please find attached the 1/3/00 A01 Global Standards Exception Reporting.  I
am hoping to get you consolidated reports for the remaining standards by next
week as well as work on getting the missing entities reports as well.  Please
let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks,

Christy


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR>
<META content="..\Misc Designs\IDS cellular\ids06.ufo"
name="PhotoImpact Document">

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This email is not sent unsolicited. This is an Opt in Network mailing!

This message is sent to subscribers ONLY.

The e-mail subscription address is: tlokey@enron.com

To unsubscribe please click
here.
or

Send an email with remove as the subject to remove@brain2002.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

F44DC773-22AA-484A-A193-94A62E667E2A


As far as your email questions, my responses are following:

1.  The list I have provided you is the only list that exists on financial
counterparties.  There is no Excel spreadsheet to follow.
2.  Duke Energy Corporation.  At Mark's direction, I am sending his note
below regarding utilities.  Again, until we do the due diligence on a utility
counterparty we have no way of knowing what kind of local, state or federal
regulation or approvals they may be subject to.   We currently have masters
in place with only about 10 utilities/govt's.  We are in the process of
negotiating another 30.  Until those masters are executed and we have the
relevant resolutions, authority documents and/or legal opinions, I cannot
approve them for online trading.  I have made every effort to search company
websites and elicit from Credit whether a counterparty is a regulated utility
or not.  If I cannot tell by the information available to me, additional due
diligence will be needed to see if they are subject to local, state, or
federal regulation.   Mark can override any decision I have made, I can only
make decisions within the guidelines the attorneys have set for me.
3.  Montana Power Trading and Marketing Company is a subsidiary of a
regulated utility.  I am unable to determine from Credit or their website
what type of regulation they might be subject to.  The note is true that
Credit says they are getting out of the business anyway.
4.  Petrotemex.   Per my conversations with Mark and our advice from counsel,
unlike U.S. and U.K. counterparties, Mexican counterparties are not able to
enter into derivative transactions unless their articles and bylaws
specifically provide for these types of transactions.  We will not know this
until the due diligence is completed, so I am supposed to say "no" for
Mexican counterparties we do not have a master swap agreement in place with.
5.  PSEG. It is an energy services company; however, it is also not an
eligible swap participant (or "ESP").  CFTC regulation limits the derivatives
trading we may do to certain types of counterparties that meet certain
financial requirements (large, institutional type investors, companies,
banks, etc).  Corporations and partnerships have to meet certain net worth
and asset levels or we cannot trade financially with them.  Whenever I say
"not ESP" or "not eligible swap participant" it means they have not met the
financial net worth test.
6.  The American Coal Company.  See prior note.

---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/13/99 04:21 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Bob Shults                           10/12/99 10:15 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

Does this mean that we have 10 utilities that are approved to trade?  What
are we doing with the other 30-40?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 10/12/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Online Derivatives Trading with Regulated Utilities

We have not decided "to prevent any regulated utility from completing any
financial transactions" online.  If we have already satisfactorily concluded
the necessary due diligence with respect to a particular utility, they will
be approved.  It is only with respect to those utilities which have not yet
been researched that we are withholding approval.  The due diligence required
involves asking the utility for certain information concerning their
organization and regulatory situation, hiring local counsel in the relevant
state and having research done into the laws and regulations in place there
and into any public utility commission orders respecting the particular
utility in question, and on occasion requesting an opinion letter from the
utility's counsel.  We usually begin that process only when a trader believes
there is a likelihood of a sufficient volume of trading with the utility to
justify the time and expense.  FYI, the due diligence process has in the past
revealed circumstances which prevented the utility from trading derivatives
or required actions to authorize such trading which had not been taken.

A recent count showed about 10 executed master agreements and another 30 to
40 in one stage or another of the due diligence/negotiation process.

Louise Kitchen
10/06/99 02:46 PM
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Customer Data

On Friday we will be receiving the remaining customer list from credit, due
to the timescales I am asking for turnaround on the customer matrix and
master agreement review by the end of play Tuesday 12th October.

Any problems with this please notify me immediately as we are now running up
against very tight deadlines in terms of getting all of the information in
the system for the launch schedule.

Thanks

Louise

Mark,
On another note we are requesting a review of the blanket decision which has
been made to prevent any regulated utility from completing any financial
transactions, if we are not prepared to do the due diligence on which ones
can transact and which ones can not - is this our responsibility or theirs?
ie their decision whether to trade or not.
Louise


Hi Mark,

Thanks for the analyses and the rapid turnaround.  It's great working with
you.

Attached is your spreasheet with a couple of summary plots that you might
find interesting.  I have included the previous results you generated for the
case where no filtering on wind direction was done.

The results indicate to me that the additional filtering of the data is
overall improving the accuracy of the free-stream wind speed estimation
(based on the mean nacelle wind speed and mean wind speed ratio), but at the
cost of larger standard error because of the reduction in number of samples.
Therefore, it seems that additional filtering might not be so valuable
afterall.

Any comments?

Philippe


Tana:

No changes to Rhonda's e-mail --

None of the following are authorized to trade US power:

Equiva Trading Company
Glencore Ltd.
Western Gas Resources, Inc.
Black Hills Corporation
Murchison Oil & Gas
S. Carolina Pipeline Corporation
Steward Petroleum Corporation

***************
No change to profile for Turlock
Black Hills Corp., d/b/a . . . is okay to trade US power.

Leslie


YOU HAVE ACCESS TO COME IN THE BUILDING ON SUNDAY BETWEEN 2:00 PM AND 6:00 PM. YOU'RE NAME WILL BE ON A LIST AT THE DOOR ON THE 6TH FLOOR.   THERE WILL BE IT  SUPPORT ON THE FLOOR TO HELP YOU IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH YOUR SYSTEMS.

THANK YOU
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


LM's # 1-6, 19-20, plus a couple of ABB transformers.


Everyone,

Effective immediately - Marcus Nettleton will be the contact atty for
Physical Power. Pls copy him on all necessary emails rather than me.

Thanks,

Shari


Steve,  We are currently negotiating an interconnect agreement for an upgrade
of an existing interconnect off the Trawick System into TUFCO.  The
interconnect is solely a delivery to TUFCO.  We are down to one point of
difference in the agreement.

Typically HPL disclaims any liability for consequential damages to the other
party.  TUFCO is asking for an exception for any violation of gas quality
specifications.  This would mean that if HPL delivered off spec gas to TUFCO
which required cleanup of their pipeline system or caused damage to a
customer of TUFCO's HPL would be liable under this Agreement.

From a legal standpoint, we can make this exception, but I wanted to make
sure everyone understood and agreed with the acceptance of this potential
liability.  Assuming we are properly monitoring all our receipts there
shouldn't be an issue.

Please let me know what you think about this situation.  I can forward a copy
of the interconnect agreement if you do not currently have one.


Steve
?
This is a draft of the contact  list I promised you.? There are still some
typos in it.? I will clean  them up and get send you a draft in the morning
that is ready for  circulation.
?
This list is made?up  of?people that I know?and trust.? By an large I have
excluded  sitting pubic officials.? In cases where a given organization has
several  useful contacts with similar knowledge, I have listed just one
person for  now.
?
Give me a call at your  convenience, and we can discuss this in great detail.
?
Kevin
213-926-2626
 - Kevin Scott -  Key Contacts - Draft.doc


Shack,

Thanks for the nice note.  Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, but I
took a couple of weeks off for the holidays  immediately following the
announcement.

The reunion was really great, and I'm sorry too that we missed each other.
Next time you get to Houston, please give me a call (713.853.6894).  It would
be great to get together and catch up.

Hope you had a great holiday and Happy New Year!
-kai-
Rocky

Craig_Shackleton@amat.com on 12/19/2000 12:52:42 PM
To: jskilli@enron.com
cc:

Subject: CEO - congrats

Rocky,
I saw the announcement of your promotion in the Austin paper a couple days ago
and wanted to send my congratulations.   I recall our freshman year, you wrote
your chemistry paper on energy, I wrote mine on semiconductors.  Little did we
know our initial interests as 18 year olds would become our careers.

Arends says he sees you regularly when you hold your financial reviews.  I
wasn't able to make it to his wedding.  Did you? If so, how was it?

Sorry we weren't able to connect at the reunion in October, I really hoped
we'd
have a chance to catch up on what's happened since we last talked (maybe 15
years ago?).    Hope you aren't overwhelmed with the Beta egroups email
banter.
It's been fun reacquainting with the brothers.  I'm getting together with Bill
Jordan next month in California on one of my trips.  I know you're busy, but
if
you have a second, drop a reply.

I'm proud of your career accomplishments and our shared history and
friendship.
Good work, worm.
Have a great holiday.
-kai-
Shack


The attached filing will be made at the CPUC later today related to EES'
claims on the Negative CTC - PX Credits.  The lawyers are continuing to
refine the document.  The discussion about how big the $ is will be deleted.

This does not get at PG&E's claim that the rate freeze had ended and
therefore the PX Credit was not applicable.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/19/2001 05:14 PM -----

	Harry Kingerski
	01/19/2001 05:13 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Complaint

----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 01/19/2001 05:12 PM -----

	Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	01/19/2001 04:57 PM

		 To: Harry.Kingerski@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Complaint

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/19/2001 04:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Mike D Smith@EES on 01/19/2001 04:37 PM
To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Complaint

 Iris--call bob to make sure he got this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 01/19/2001 04:37
PM ---------------------------

JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com> on 01/19/2001 04:30:15 PM
To: "Mike Smith (E-mail)" <msmith1@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Complaint

All right here it is --

The best I could come up with in three hours.

 <<X20098.DOC>>

I will wait to hear from  you.

Jeanne

 - X20098.DOC


One minor edit---it's the PX, not the ISO, that's taken itself into voluntary
bankruptcy.  See redline version attached.

Only other comment:  I'm not sure that, technically/contractually, we entered
into transactions with the PX (in the same way that I don't think that folks
enter into transactions with NYMEX).  (See opening line of last paragraph.)

We have exposure to thePX based on our commercial activity that took place
through the PX, and that exposure depends on how the PX /FERC decide
particular issues.  In short, we have transactions with the utilities, and
exposure to the PX based on transactions that we entered into with other
counter parties via the PX market mechanism.  That said, seems to me that,
for the purposes of the disclosure, the language is fine---just want to raise
the flag. Might be useful to run it by Richard Sanders.

Hope this helps.

Best,
Jeff


I will be on the first panel of the FERC California conference on Thursday.
The format allows a 5 min presentation and then 60 min of Q&A.  I need your
help to make sure I have "Gore-like" command of the details.  Please help
with the following information:
Enron project information (Parquet/McCubbin) -- please give me any
presentations or summaries you have on the generation, or firm purchases, we
have under way (or planned).  I'll talk with you to find out what we are
comfortable disclosing but please err on the side of giving whatever
information you have.
Updated Belden presentation (Hain/Belden) -- I believe the latest information
was as of August; I think some of the information on the cost of peaking
facilities is particularly eye-opening on the price cap issue.
Comparison to PJM (Hartsoe/Novosel) -- Is the information we are seeking from
the ISO and PX similar to information PJM already provides?  If so, it would
be nice to tie our requests back to something the Commission has already
approved.
Cancelled DSM projects (Mahoney) -- Again, I'll only use what we feel
comfortable with, but it would help make our point if we can give examples of
how price caps backfire when it comes to encouraging conservation.
ISO/PX reports (Dasovich).  I have the ISO market surveillance report.  Is
there another ISO report?  If so, please get me a copy and provide a copy of
the PX report too.
CEC/Proposed generation update (Mara/Parquet) -- Need the basic information:
proposed, waiting for permitting; how much/little the legislation did to
expedite siting (ie are we still comfortable saying that it applies to less
than 10%)?
Soft cap(Belden/Hain) -- need a crisp explanation of why the "soft" nature of
the cap is not sufficient.  Also, would we be OK if the Commission revised it
to say that bids can be taken above 150 without special filing or reporting
requirements, but those bids will be accepted at the price bid rather than
applying to all lower bids as well (ie the highest bid at or below 150 clears
the market, bids above 150 accepted at price bid as needed)?
Offers we have made/deals done (Parquet/Dasovich/ Mccubbin) -- Roseville plus
any others, offer made to SDG&E -- I want to make the point that the market
will provide solutions (below the retail price cap) if we get the utility
(and the regulators) out of the merchant function.
Herding the cats(Hartsoe/mccubbin/mara/dasovich):  We are asking FERC to be
courageous, do the right thing and ignore the politics.  To be even halfway
credible, we can't have IEP, EPSA, Dynegy or anyone else "squishing" on the
price cap issue..  We have never been closer to reform in California, we need
these guys on board.
Thanks.


I assume we avoid Libya completely.  The question, though, may be how we
proceed if we are doing business with someone who has activities in Libya.
Your views please.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:01 AM -----

	Nicholas O'Day
	10/16/2000 04:59 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron's policy on Libya

Steve,

Itochu Corporation, a Japanese trading company with which we are developing a
relationship, is considering reactivating its activities in Libya. They have
identified an opportunity to source LNG from Libya for the purposes of
importing to Japan, either directly or through an LNG swap.

What is Enron's current policy on dealing with Libya?

kind regards


Ken, Ken Lay said he is fine with this.

Rosie

Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/01/2001 03:48 PM
To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@Enron,
James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Metts/NA/Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou
L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@Enron, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Greg
Piper/Corp/Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Dorothy
Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Executive Committee Recommendation - VP Candidate - Rick Fehl

Executive Committee:

We would like to pursue an offer to Rick Fehl prior to the next Executive
Committee meeting on May 7, 2001.  Please forward your comments or questions
as soon as possible.

You will find attached the recommendation letter and his resume.

Regards,

Ken Rice & Kevin Hannon


Dana -

Thanks for your comments.  As to the name, that is taken care of.  As to
Paragraph 2, I believe the language merely requires that the fact that
disclosure of the Confidential Information (CI) has been made, that a review
of the CI is underway or that discussions between the parties are underway
(including the status of these discussions) are the only things prohibited by
this provision.  It does not say that the existence of the agreement cannot
be disclosed.  If there is any particular part that you find objectionable,
let's talk about it as this is a provision that is fairly standard for Enron
and carries some importance.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	"Dana C. Grogan" <dcgrogan@cmsenergy.com>
	05/11/2001 08:52 AM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc: "Debbie T. Adams" <dtadams@cmsenergy.com>, Stephen.Abbanat@enron.com,
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
		 Subject: NDA - CMS Energy - Panhandle Pipe Line Companies

  This agreement should be in the name of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company.

We want to strike item #2.  The language provides that we will not disclose
the "existence" of the confidentiality agreement.  Normally, we only agree
not to disclose the confidential information.

If these changes are acceptable, we will be ready to arrange a meeting.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.

Dana Grogan
dcgrogan@cmsenergy.com
(713) 989-7230

Tana.Jones@enron.com on 04/03/2001 01:10:13 PM

To:   tsmehta@cmsenergy.com
cc:   Stephen.Abbanat@enron.com, Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject:  NDA - CMS Energy - Panhandle Pipe Line Companies

At the request of Stephen Abbanat, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   We would appreciate it if you could please
verify whether "CMS Energy-Panhandle Pipe Line Companies" is the correct
legal name of your company.  If you have any comments or questions, please
call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897as I will be on
vacation the rest of this week.

(See attached file: cms energy.doc)

(See attached file: cms energy.doc)

 - cms energy.doc


Here are the FT Positions.  Let me know how they look.

Thanks,
Robin


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Linda Guinn
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Linda Guinn Law Conference 2001
Report Total: $729.50
Amount Due Employee: $729.50

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


FYI--our local counsel's view on Domingo Cavallo (the third Minister of
Economy in a month) as it relates to stamp tax. There are 3 articles on him
in Wednesday's FT.  Sounds like we have friends in high places.  Pete do you
know Carlos Bastos?

By the way, in talking with Gonzalo Flores at the World Bank, it looks like
our claim before the International Center for the Settlement of Investment
Disputes (ICSID) could be registered on Friday.  Recall that ICSID is the
only arbitration forum in the world where a claimant must meet numerous
jurisdictional and standing requirements under the ICSID Convention and the
BIT to be "registered."  It's not a slam dunk especially since TGS has filed
claims in the local court, so if registration is granted Friday, we'll have
cleared the first hurdle. Call me if you have questions. 56159
Regards,
Michelle
-----Original Message-----
From:  Guido Tawil <GT@bomchil.com.ar>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Blaine, Michelle; Guido Tawil
Cc: "\"Kellie Meiman\" <kmeiman (E-mail)"@ENRON; dbishop@kslaw.com
Subject: RE: PPP/PFI Law

Dear Michelle,
Cavallo is supposed to make public his so promoted bill today or tomorrow. I
don%t know much about it yet. He said that he will be trying to abolish stamp
tax in the provinces but we will have to see what happens.
Please take into account that the new Ministry of Infrastructure (Carlos
Bastos) and former Secretary of Energy during Cavallo%s previous period is a
very close friend of Enron, former advisor of your company and it seems all
the energy matters will depend on him.
Although Cavallo has gathered positive reactions, the situation is extremely
difficult and it%s not clear that he will get the needed support from other
parties (and even from the radical party)
I think we will have to wait a little bit before trying to contact him or his
team.
Best regards,
Guido Santiago Tawil
M. & M. Bomchil
Suipacha 268, piso 12
(C1008AAF) Buenos Aires
Argentina
Tel  (54 11) 4321 7500
Fax (54 11) 4321 7555
E-mail gt@bomchil.com.ar
www.bomchil.com.ar
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Blaine, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Blaine@ENRON.com]
Enviado el: Mi,rcoles, 21 de Marzo de 2001 03:09 p.m.
Para: Guido Santiago Tawil(eMail) (E-mail)
CC: "Kellie Meiman" <kmeiman (E-mail); dbishop@kslaw.com
Asunto: PPP/PFI Law
Guido I have an article from Freshfield's about a new law the Argentine
Congress is considering to attract foreign investment, intended to
promote private sectoir participation in infrastructure development.  It
also states that "it is also anticipated that several Argentine
provinces will enact their own legislation to facilitate projects within
their jurisdiction."  What do you know about it?
What is everyone's pulse on Cavallo?  There are three articles about him
today in the Financial Times. Any thoughts on how this will impact our
stamp tax case?  Any chance we can get in to see him?


March 13, 2002    Dear Flycheap.com Subscriber,  You are receiving this email because you are a registered user of Flycheap.com and have indicated that you would like to receive travel specials from us.    Here's what you'll find in today's Flycheap newsletter . . .     - Great Airfares as low as $92 roundtrip    - Top 3 Cruise Deals    - Vacation Rentals - 7 All-Inclusive Nights in Cancun    - Reserve your Hotel Room online and Save!  For more information, please visit www.flycheap.com

		  GREAT AIRFARES AS LOW AS $92 ROUNDTRIP
		These roundtrip airfares found on FlyCheap.com include all taxes and surcharges.
	 Phoenix to Las Vegas   Los Angeles  to San Francisco  Raleigh to Kansas City  Memphis to Tampa  Hartford to Orlando  Washington to Chicago  Pittsburgh to Omaha  New York City to Miami  San Diego to Albuquerque   Seattle to Salt Lake City  Atlanta to Dallas  Cincinnati to New Orleans  Detroit to West Palm Beach  Houston to Denver San Francisco to Indianapolis  	 $92  $134  $162  $170  $172  $184  $187  $189  $192  $196  $200  $213  $215   $221 $239
		Fares available from where you live to everywhere you want to go.   Call 1-800-FLY CHEAP or visit www.flycheap.com    Remember to Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

		  TOP 3 CRUISE DEALS
		1.  Carnival - 4 Nt Bahamas Cruise - from $259    2.  Norwegian - 7 Nt Caribbean from only $399   3.  Royal Caribbean - 5 Nt Caribbean - from $429     For other hot cruise deals, visit  www.mytravel.com

		  VACATION RENTAL SPECIAL
		Cancun, Mexico - 7 All-Inclusive nights from just $735* per person   All-inclusive Caribbean Village Cancun is a beach lover's dream with a setting you'll have to see to believe!   From just $1469 total cost for 2 guests for a hotel suite  *Per person pricing based upon double occupancy  Click here for more details

		  RESERVE YOUR HOTEL ROOM ONLINE
		Now that you've booked your flights, search for hotels on Flycheap.com's sister site, MyTravel.com. On the MyTravel.com Hotel Search Engine you can reserve online at one of our 53,000 hotels, resorts and inns. It is safe and secure and you'll find some of the best Hotel Rates in the industry.   Click here to reserve your room online

		This email is free service of Flycheap.com and MyTravel USA.   For more information, please visit:  www.flycheap.com         You received this mailing at this address:  sscott5@enron.com   To unsubscribe from Flycheap.com mailings or change your mailing preferences, please click here      Flycheap.com is part of the MyTravel Group.  Click here  for details.

		Airfare Terms and Conditions: Roundtrip fares require 14-day advance purchase, Saturday night stay, and Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday travel only.  Quoted fares valid 4/16/02 - 5/2/02 and must be ticketed by 3/18/02.  Domestic fares include all taxes and fees.  Fares non-refundable and may not be available on all flights.   Cruise Terms and Conditions: All rates are per person, double occupancy, cruise only, do not include airfare, and include port charges unless otherwise indicated above. Government fees and taxes are additional. All rates are subject to availability and may go up, sell out, or be withdrawn by the cruise line at any time.   Vacation Rentals Terms and Conditions: Rates shown are per unit for the specific time period listed and include applicable taxes. Guests may not exceed maximum occupancy for specific unit purchased. Rates may sell out at any time. Additional dates and unit sizes are listed on the website.     FL Seller of Travel Reg. No. ST-33310 CST# 2043440-40 IA SOT 645  Copyright ? 2002, MyTravel USA[IMAGE]


Steve,

Steve, this is the spreadsheet.

Also, please, let Shirley know if the dinner on Sun is OK.

Vince


I realize this is late notice, but it just occurred to me that I never
discussed my Christmas vacation plans with you when I transferred into
Trading. I have a family trip planned and paid for, so I hope it won't cause
too much chaos if I'm gone. I understand the tendency for people to feel lost
and helpless without me.

I'm supposed to be in California with my dad on Dec. 22, then in Mexico with
my mom from Dec. 26 to Jan. 2. So I basically need to miss four days of work.
Again, I'm sorry to bring this to you so late, and I'd be glad to do any
amount of work before or after, or even spend my holiday entering deals on
the computer in some exotic Central American internet cafe. I've heard
they're great places to rage.

We can discuss the logistics when you're back in the office. And by the way,
the flame in this e-mail does not indicate anger, but rather is meant to be a
festive, joyous, holiday-time explosion.

Kate


As a follow up to my email from yesterday, responses to SoCalEd's Petition
are due on Tuesday, January 2.  Dan Watkiss has spoken to the FERC attorneys
who will be answering the Petition, and he is comfortable that FERC will be
able to adequately defend FERC against the Petition.  Additionally, Sue Mara
will contact IEP to see if they will be responding to the Petition, and I
have a call in to EPSA to see if they will be responding.  Therefore, because
the responses seem to be adequately covered, and to keep Enron's name out of
the headlines, we do not plan on responding separately to the Petition.

If you have any comments or questions, please let us know.

Sarah

	Sarah Novosel
	12/27/2000 02:19 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, susan.j.mara@enron.com, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: SoCalEd Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

On December 26, SoCalEd filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against FERC
regarding FERC's December 15 order, asking the Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit to direct FERC to establish and order "just and reasonable cost-based
rates" for sales in the California ISO and PX markets.  SoCal requests that
the Court act by January 5.

SoCal argues that its lenders have said that unless FERC acts immediately to
"restore creditor confidence" in SoCal's ability to repay its loans, that
SoCal will not be able to access additional funding, so that by mid-January
SoCal will be unable to buy electricity, resulting in rolling blackouts to
its customers.

Please let me know if you have any questions or would like a faxed copy of
the petition.

Sarah


Thanks Roger.  Here are the highlights of today's hearings:

 Common themes--many tracked ours pretty closely
Not a question of whether rates need to rise, but by how much.
Though some oppose any and all rate increases, the lion's share acknowledged
that the utilities have a cash flow problem and the a rate increase is
necessary.
Due process matters.
If the Commission is thinking about going as far as ending rate freezes and
increasing rates, it better provide for ample due process, or countless law
suits will ensue.
Don't jump the gun.
A rate increase is likely, but only the utilities benefit from adoption of
the utilities' proposals. The Commission needs to carefully scrutinize the
utilities' claims and take a careful look at the level of increase required
to maintain access to capital markets.  However, as expected, the utilities
implored the Commission to jump the gun immediately.  The utilities want the
Commission to declare an end to the rate freeze and raise rates on Jan.4.
No more divestiture.
The utility should keep the generating assets it retained, but the Commission
should ensure that the assets' benefits are allocated equally among all
customers.  One legislator recommended that the State buy the utilities'
hydro assets, which would give the utilities the cash they need and give the
state control over some generation.
Treat all customers equally and fairly.
The Commission should not create two classes of customers (e.g., large v.
small; direct access v. bundled).  No customer group should be sacrificied to
save another.
Be as narrow as possible/do as little harm as possible
The immediate problem is the utility's cash/credit crunch.  As such, the
Commission should do only enough to solve this very specific, immediate
problem.  A modest rate increase is all that's required and the Commission
should do no more.

At the beginning and the end of the hearing, the President of the Commission
asked parties to be prepared (at tomorrow's hearing) to discuss whether the
Commission could legally use its other, broad powers to raise rates without
declaring an end to the rate freeze.  It seems that she seems some benefit in
raising rates, but leaving AB 1890 otherwise intact untill the Commission can

Marketers and generators are to blame for the problem
Though not universally embraced, the theme came up repeatedly.

A few parties (e.g., the Unions, low income consumer groups, one PUC
commissioner) called for complete re-regulation of the industry, returning
the utilities to vertically integrated monopolies.  But they were the
exception rather than the rule at today's hearing.

2. Next steps
There hearings were scheduled to end on Thursay, but now will continue
through Friday.
Tomorrow, lawyers will provide "oral" arguments on whether the Commission
must end the rate freeze in order to increase rates.  We will argue that it
does not have to, and should not, go through the complex and controversial
exercise of determing whether the rate freeze is over between now and
01.04.01.  We will argue that the Commission has the authority to raise rates
without ending the rate freeze, and if it decides to raise rates, it should
do so while keeping AB 1890's basic structure in place until a full and fair
hearing of the issues is completed.   We are talking to other stakeholders to
persuade them to take the same approach.  In terms of legal arguments, this
is clearly a long shot, but one that seems worth taking.
After the oral argument, the utilities will present their rate proposals and
"all interested persons" will have the opportunity to cross-examine the
utilities (in short, tomorrow will also be a zoo).
When asked what the process will be for issuing a proposed decision and
providing comments, the President of the Commission responded "we don't know,
it's evolving."  In other words, the Commission is doing a poor job of
ensuring that their Jan 4 decision is "appeal-proof."
Keep in mind that the situation remains extremely fluid and the trend is
still toward ending the rate freeze on Jan. 4th.  We continue to aggressively
offer alternatives to that possibility and continue to try to bring other
stakeholders to our side.
We're doing everything necessary to preserve our appeal rights.

We can discuss further on the 10 AM (CST) call tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

	Roger Yang@EES
	12/27/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora
Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group
EB2868

Got an update from Jeff Dasovich.  No earth shattering news.  Comments have
been all over the place.  The impression is being made by differing parties
that the issues are very complex and would inevitably result in endless
lawsuits.  Possible conclusion by the CPUC may be to invoke emergency powers
to implement an emergency surcharge and avoid addressing the issue of when
the rate freeze ends in these hearings.  However, this is just speculation.
Jeff will return to the office by 5:00 pm PST and will send out a summary of
today's hearings.

Roger

Leticia Botello
12/27/2000 06:57 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group EB2868

12/27/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


Thought these were some nice pictures that one of the guys who was stationed here last year took.  I want to know where he is stationed right now, though.  I think Chuck would love to be doing flying like that.
-Chris
  Note: forwarded message attached.

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messengerhttp://phonecard.yahoo.com/
X-Apparently-To: cscott_korea@yahoo.com via web4403; 21 Jul 2001 19:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from f18.law3.hotmail.com  (EHLO hotmail.com) (209.185.241.18)  by mta305.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2001 19:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;	 Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:31:05 -0700
Received: from 211.216.216.115 by lw3fd.law3.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Sun, 22 Jul 2001 02:31:01 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [211.216.216.115]
From: "derek lehr" <dntlehr1@hotmail.com>
To: betgraham@hotmail.com, cscott_korea@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd:
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 21:31:01 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_442f_5e94_6093"
Message-ID: <F18xapzhad2VqKwRPQI00002e71@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2001 02:31:05.0086 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B4599E0:01C11256]
Content-Length: 257091

>From: "jack vilardi" <jvilardi@hotmail.com>
>To: arttara@surf1.de, Chrlwlf@aol.com, lovediver21@yahoo.com,
>dntlehr1@hotmail.com, faithanderson2@yahoo.com, jcarcich66@hotmail.com,
>mr_magellan@yahoo.com, t00000tni@iname.com, wrbartlett@att.net,
>carolvilardi@hotmail.com
>Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:06:12
>
>Hello
>
>I just thought you might like to see some pictures of our most recent trip
>to the Bahamas.......
>
>Talk to you soon
>
>Jack

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 00_00010.jpg
 - 00_00011.jpg
 - 00_00012.jpg


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 11:45 AM -----

	Becky Stephens@ENRON
	09/21/2000 09:29 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: DOJ invoices from V&E

One of them has already been paid and just needs to be allocated, but I can
send you a copy of it.  The other one has not been paid yet and I will send
the original.  thanks.

Becky A. Stephens
Litigation Unit, Enron Corp.
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 fax
EB4809

	Richard B Sanders@ECT
	09/20/2000 05:59 PM

		 To: Becky Stephens/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: DOJ invoices from V&E

Send them to me

	Becky Stephens@ENRON
	09/20/2000 05:48 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: DOJ invoices from V&E

Richard - I just wanted to verify who should be paying for the last 2 DOJ
invoices we have received from V&E.  Should I split those costs between you,
GPG and NB, or does ENA pay the whole invoice??  Thanks for your help!

Becky A. Stephens
Litigation Unit, Enron Corp.
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 fax
EB4809


Louise -

The following individuals will be returning to work tomorrow.

Zach Morning
Linden Chiu
Cecil John
Stephen Matthew
Karen O'Day
Mark Fillinger

Although Amelia is marked for termination in our global system, apparantly, she never left.  I will make sure that this gets updated.

A message has been left for Lydia - as soon as I hear back, I will let you know.

Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:	RE: Terminated Employees

Please get the following back
Immediate
Webb	-	Zach Moring			ENW - Corporate Systems (is this the correct person - the spreadsheet just had Zach M and this is the only person I could find)
Webb	-	Linden Chiu			ENW - ENA Front Office and Risk Systems
Hall		-	Amelia Cavazos			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Gas Support
Piper	-	Lydia Cannon			Enron Online
Piper 	- 	Cecil John			Enron Online
Piper	-	Stephen Matthew		Enron Online
Piper	-	Karen O'Day			Enron Online
 Belden	-	Mark Fillinger			West Development - San Francisco

[Kitchen, Louise]
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:28 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Terminated Employees

Louise -

The following employees are showing either an immediate or future termination indicator.

Immediate
Zach Moring			ENW - Corporate Systems (is this the correct person - the spreadsheet just had Zach M and this is the only person I could find)
Linden Chiu			ENW - ENA Front Office and Risk Systems
Deidre McCaffrey		EGM-EFM Forward Trading
Peter Bennett			ENA Compression Services
Amelia Cavazos			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Gas Support
Lydia Cannon			Enron Online
Cecil John			Enron Online
Stephen Matthew		Enron Online
Karen O'Day			Enron Online
Mark Fillinger			West Development - San Francisco

Future
Israel Estrada			ENW - Energy Ops Power Risk Management East
Cynthia Shoup			ENW - Energy Ops Financial Settlements
Nicholas Warner		ENW - Risk Management, Portland

If you require any additional information, please let me know.

Amy


Gentlemen,

I've populated the short executive summary attached.  Thanks for all your
support.

Regards,
Tom

----- Forwarded by Thomas Bennett/HOU/EES on 05/10/2001 05:01 PM -----

	Fred Kelly
	05/10/2001 01:44 PM

		 To: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jay
Ferry/HOU/EES@EES, Thomas Bennett/HOU/EES@EES, David Sweitzer
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jay Ferry/HOU/EES@EES,
David Hart/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: FW: Paths of influence

Dirk/Jay - thanks for the quick response.  I want to insure we have
accurately portrayed the situation to you both (the real duration of our
requests, and the real response time of the utilities).  Don't want anyone to
walk into a response of "..... we've only had that request for XX days....".
We do need help though if we want to achieve our aggressive schedule.

We are falling behind our target schedule due to a lack of pulse meter
contact installations.  How hard would it be to get informal org charts for
the metering side of SCE, SDGE, and PGE (just simple bob works for jim who
works for tom who reports to bill), and......, to identify who (within
Enron/CEC/ISO) has the relationship(s) with those groups?

The execution side of the boxter effort asked Jay who they could talk to to
insure we were working "smart" in California with respect to getting interval
meters modified to include pulse contacts.  The execution team wants to
insure that we aren't standing in the wrong long line.  We want to know who
we could/should call to express our "appreciation" for all their cooperation,
and to insure they knew our aggressive timetable.   How many times have
you/we heard "........ oh....., that's what you are doing....., if someone
had just called me........, I could have........".

The request for "contacts" (and to know the metering org chart inside each of
these three utilities) was so we could attempt to penetrate those three org's
(SCE, SDGE, PG&E) at the optimum level.  Additionally - if we have acct mgmt
folks that have relationships - we want to leverage those.

Tom - can you provide to those listed above the short exec summary of what we
have requested from SDGE, SCE, PGE, and...., what their response has been
(use the attached XLS chart).  Help charactarize when we officially made
request, so that we provide an accurate perception of the three utility's
responses.

Thx

From: Dirk vanUlden/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on 05/10/2001
11:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange, Fred Kelly/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: Paths of influence

Jeff, we are rolling out a CEC/CALISO curtailment initiative in California
that provides major benefits to our customers. Before the program can be
implemented, customer facilities need to be equipped with a pulse generating
meter (a modified version of a regular meter). As we are no longer the MSP we
now have to rely on the UDCs to install these meters. We fully expect to pay
for these installations but we are getting major push back in SCE and PG&E
territory with respect to scheduling these installations. If we were to go by
PG&E's schedule (12 weeks), the summer will be over and most benefits will be
lost.

We are under the impression that Enron is plain dirt in the eyes of the UDC
employees, and we are being singled out by the rank and file folks as the
major culprit for the energy crisis. However primitive that opinion is, we
are stuck with it. Please note Jay Ferry's contention below.

Is there a way for you to nudge some UDC executives and ask them to instruct
their field crews to start cooperating?  We could use the help.

Dirk A. van Ulden
Director, Account Services
Enron Energy Services, Northwest Region
(925) 543-3879
2-way pager 877-680-9472
Fax (925) 543-3550
dirk_vanulden@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Ferry,Jay
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:32 AM
To: vanUlden, Dirk
Subject: Paths of influence

Dirk,

We have been working with Mike Connaly and his boss, Mel Calais, at SCE to
expedite deployment of pulse meters.  Do you know the chain of command there
and if there is anyone higher that we could call if work continues to move
along at a snail's pace.  Please call me (713-646-7086) or respond by e-mail,
if you can't reach me.

Thanks,
j


Welcome to Enron!  You have joined an exciting company at a critical time in
the growth of the energy industry worldwide.  As a part of the Enron team,
you will be at the forefront of that change.

Ours is a dynamic company and it is important for you to understand both the
breadth and the depth of the company you have just joined.  We believe that
"open communication" is critical to the company's ongoing success, as well as
to yours.  As an ongoing part of the New Hire Network, we invite you to
attend the corporate sponsored full day :"Enron at a Glance"  This program
builds upon the orientation you may have received your first day on the job.

Reserve the date!

Date:    Wednesday, July 26, 2000
Time:    8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Continental Breakfast at 7:45 a.m.)
Location:   Hyatt Regency - Downtown (Imperial Ballroom)
  1200 Louisiana Street (lunch provided)
  (713)654-1234

You will learn about our various businesses, their products, services,
markets and strategies and how they fit together to make Enron unique in the
energy industry.  You will learn about our regulated and unregulated
businesses, our domestic and international markets, our competitive position
and our organization structure.

Members of the senior management team of the corporation will be there to
review these areas with you personally.  We will also talk about our culture
and values, what sets us apart from other companies in this area, what we
expect of employees and what we offer in return.

Please enroll by leaving a voice mail message at (713) 853-7181.  In the
event you should have any questions, please call Jeff D. Davis at (713)
345-8908.

We look forward to seeing you on the 26th!


Jeff - attached are PG&E's comments to the Enron guarantee associated with
the 10 day call transaction.  The revisions don't appear to be significant to
me, but I obviously defer to your judgement.  Let me know what you think.

Thanks - Gregg

----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 10:03 AM -----

	r.rodriguez@pecorp.com
	12/12/2000 08:31 AM

		 To: gregg.penman@enron.com, m.klyasheff@pecorp.com
		 cc: a.huprikar@pecorp.com
		 Subject: FW: Review of enovate, LLC Guarantee

Mary and Gregg attached is a copy of the comments PG&E made to the parental
guarantee form.  Please forward any comments directly to Mary.

Mary, the contact person from PG&E is listed below.

Thank-you

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandoval, Gloria [mailto:Gloria.Sandoval@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:06 PM
To: 'r.rodriguez@pecorp.com'
Cc: Murphy, Tanya; Ochsner, Sarah; Bougadis, Paul
Subject: FW: Review of enovate, LLC Guarantee

Roy, attached are the proposed guarantee formats as reviewed by our
attorney.  Please review and comment directly to Tanya Murphy, our attorney.
Although one of the guarantees states $1MM, I am still trying to get a firm
amount considering the fluctuations in prices and ensuring the March 31
termination date is OK.

We appreciate hearing from you very soon.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murphy, Tanya
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 12:07 PM
> To: Sandoval, Gloria; Barker, Joe
> Cc: Ochsner, Sarah; Hein, Jennifer; Pedersen, Julie
> Subject: Review of enovate, LLC Guarantee
>
>
>  Have you had an opportunity to review the parent guarantees for
> enovate, LLC?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murphy, Tanya
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:26 PM
> To: Barker, Joe
> Cc: Ochsner, Sarah; Pedersen, Julie; Hein, Jennifer
> Subject: FW: enovate, LLC
>
> Below please find the marked versions of the parent guaranties for
> envoate, LLC. Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Murphy, Tanya
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 3:32 PM
> To: Sandoval, Gloria
> Subject: enovate, LLC
>
>
>  Attached are marked versions of the parent guarantees for enovate,
> LLC.  Please note that I have placed brackets around the Guarantee Cap as
> stated in the PEC Guaranty and have left the Enron Guaranty blank, subject
> to your comments. Thanks.
>  <<Enron Guaranty (from Master) 120400.doc>>
>  <<PEC Guaranty Form with PG&E Comments 120400.doc>>

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance
upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 - Enron Guaranty (from Master) 120400.doc
 - PEC Guaranty Form with PG&E Comments 120400.doc


I believe he is going to Reliant.

ckm

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
04/06/2001 09:14 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: End of Q1 Dinner Celebration

I had no idea about Roger. Where is he going? I'll expand the list to include
your suggestions.

Kay Mann@ENRON
04/06/2001 05:25 AM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: End of Q1 Dinner Celebration

Roger Ondreko left the company (or is leaving soon).  Herman brought Billy
Flemmin (sp?) yesterday, and Billy seems to be involved in a bunch of stuff.

Your tax guys are Matt Gockerman (state) and Rhett Jackson (federal).

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           04/05/2001 08:49 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: End of Q1 Dinner Celebration

Kay:

Anybody else I need to make peace with that should be on the list?
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 08:47 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby                           04/05/2001 08:47 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Lorie Leigh
cc: Fred Mitro
Subject: End of Q1 Dinner Celebration

Lorie:

It's high time we had some fun around here!

Please set up a dinner for Wednesday, April 18 or Thursday April 19 at Papa's
steak house. The invitee list should include our whole group (including you
and Glenn), as well as:

Dave Duran
Kay Mann
Carlos Sole
Ann Elizabeth White
Jeff Hodge
Barbara Gray
Sheila Tweed
Stuart Zisman
Lisa Bills
Joe Deffner
Catherine Clark
Roseann Engeldorf
Herman Manis
Roger Ondreko

Please discuss the invitee list with Fred to determine if anybody should be
added.

Please get a preliminary head count, and contact Papa's to determine if and
when they can accommodate us. We can talk tomorrow about this.

Thanks,

Ben


Mark,
Attached is a revised memo.  The memo previously forwarded defined Bridgeline
exclusive customers as those connected to interstate pipelines.  The correct
definition of Bridgeline exclusive customers are those connected exclusively
to intrastate pipelines.  I'm sorry for any confusion.  Please destroy any
copies of the previous memo.  Thanks.  Shonnie

----- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 11:19 AM -----

	Shonnie Daniel
	11/01/2000 03:19 PM

		 To: Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Bridgeline Exclusive Customers

Mark,

Attached is a memo setting forth the customers/facilities that are included
in the Bridgeline non compete agreement.  Please call with any questions.
Shonnie 31463

	Mark Smith@ENRON
	11/01/2000 09:01 AM

		 To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bridgeline List of Industrial Customer off limits to ENA

Shonnie,
 Scott Neal gave me your name as someone who might be able to provide me with
the list of customers that are "off-limits" to ENA to provide physical gas to
via the Bridgeline agreement.  If you could email me that list, it would be
helpful.  Thanks

Mark Smith
Manager
3-6601


Tana,

Please provide the following Global Contracts personnel with read access:

Anthony Campos
Mary Solmonson
Connie Sutton
Linda S. Bryan
Sylvia Campos
Stacey Richardson
Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan
Marlene Hilliard
Faye Ellis
Bridgette Anderson
Chris Mendoza
Karen Lambert

Thank You,
Anthony

---------------------- Forwarded by Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000
07:37 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 06/01/2000 04:56 PM
To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Financial Trading Agreement Database

We are ready to open the old "Master Swap Agreement Database", now called the
"Financial Trading Agreement Database" to people outside Legal and Credit.
Can you provide me a list of the people in your group that would like access
so I can email them the agent to open the database.  Much thanks!


The good guys win again.


Jeff,

Dan is one of those guys whose talent oozes from them.  He makes songwriting
look easy, though I suspect it isn't as easy as it seems.  Obviously, his
imagination is limitless, and there's plenty to be said for his craft.  If I
wanted to criticize him, I might suggest he rein (reign?) in his act just a
little bit, in order to emphasize the songs over the personailty.  His real
personality, by the way, is mellow and understated and very unlike his stage
persona.  Go figure!

bh

PS  By the way, why did you try to steal my cell phone on Friday morning?
If you have no idea what I'm talking about, ask Prentice.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
To: "Bob Hillman" <bhillman@earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: Bob Hillman in Northern California

>
> Bob:
>
> I want to let you know that I stand in awe of someone who has the balls to
> open for someone as talented as Dan B.  It demonstrates that you're one
> talented guy yourself.  Congratulations.  Your show was great, and it was
> good to see you.   Best of luck on the rest of the tour.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>


$1 million.

p.s. the plant i was talking about is:  "hairy vetch"  or "purple vetch."
i'll look for some.  you should, too.  if you find any, make sure it's
"organic" and hasn't had any chemicals added to the seeds.

thanks again for a fantastic time over Thanksgiving.  I had a lot of fun.


Our web address is:  http://itcentral.enron.com/Data/Services/Training/
You may want to place a bookmark at this site.

A few hints on usernames & passwords:
Passwords are case sensitive and must be entered exactly as entered when
created.   You can cut and paste your USERID and/or password from the
confirmation email (Welcome) to the authentification dialogbox.

Please save the confirmation email (Welcome).  It gives you the username  and
password you will need to use each time you register online.  Use a password
that is easy for you to remember.

To register for a Technology Training class online, you must first give
yourself a password. Click the "Specify Password" button below and you will
be prompted to enter a password.  Then click the "Tech Train Setup" button
and  you will be set up to login to the Technology Training intranet site.
You will receive an eMail confirmation containing your login name and
confirming your password.

Step 1

Click button to specify a password >>>>

Step 2

Click button to complete Technology Training Online setup >>>

Thanks,
Maggie (for LeRea Pharr)
x3-1816


theres only one thing i can think of...   storage field turning around gives
cash market completely different feel.   instead of utilities looking to sell
gas everday, they look to buy it.  huge difference in feel of mrket.  not so
much actual gas but completely different economics of how marginal mmbtu gets
priced.  tightening cash market causes cash players to buy futures... hence
the tendency for a spring rally every year.  read heffner today...even he
talks about it

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/06/2001 10:22:18 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: contangos vs winter putspds

so let me ask you-if they dont buy flat px wfrom here with mega cold east
weather, cash contangos,px only 25 cts from lows, after huge apr/oct
buying-what
would take us to much higher levels?? ie whats the risk of being short today?
clueless and confused

John.Arnold@enron.com on 03/06/2001 10:51:13 AM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: contangos vs winter putspds

no real bias today  positive numbers sell negative numbers buy...
looking into other stuff

slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/06/2001 09:15:40 AM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: contangos vs winter putspds

agreewith all, im mega bear summer 2nd q but for the time being weather and
as u
said uncertainy likely to lend itself so little downside until either
weather
gets warm or injections get big. i dont see the flow as you know but i talk
to a
cupla utitlities and the bias same as you menioned. ive neutralized bear
book a
bit cuz i cant afford to fite this thing. with deep pockets tho-i scale up
sell
next 2-3 weeks take a bet on 200 ish injections in april and 400 in may-ie
records
  aug/oct-yes-low risk-wasnt substantially more inverted when we were 4
bucks
higher-low risk but not a great reward. oct/nov-yea-wont make much for
another
few months on that so it range trades but ill cont to bersd it cuz if end
summer
that strong im always always more bullish the front of winter.
  other thing i wonder is how wide these summer contangos cud get-as
everyone so
bullish futs for the next few weeks at least.
   weather here sucks to day-tree almost fell on me driving into work-close
one,sahud be about 2 ft of white stuff when its said and done. dunno how
long i
can stay but doesnt look all that great for me getting out to steamboat
manana!!

heres a hypothetical.... we agree that demand loss y on y somwhere from 4.5
to
5.0 today, do you guys think that we can see a substantial demand recovery
if
prices dont retreat? my ffeeling is no for at least another 90 days or
more.thots?
   any thots on flat px today-im slitely long vs bearsds?


aye aye.

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/16/2001 10:06 AM

		 To: "'Prentice Sellers'" <psellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Jeff Dasovich
<Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, Prentice Sellers <PSellers@pacbell.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Wine tasting

That would be perfect

-----Original Message-----
From: Prentice Sellers [mailto:psellers@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 8:00 PM
To: Nancy Sellers; Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice
Sellers; Scott Laughlin
Subject: Re: Wine tasting

Jeff should do Navarro
>---- Original Message ---
>From: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
>To: Cameron <cameron@perfect.com>, Jeff Dasovich <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>,     Prentice Sellers
<PSellers@pacbell.net>,     Scott Laughlin <scottwl@hotmail.com>
>Cc:
>Subject: Wine tasting
>
>For our wine tasting at the dome, I am assuming that Cameron and Scott will
>want to do Byron Pinot and Byron Chard.  I will probably do RMW.  Jeff and
>PP - do you have any ideas or requests that I could help you with?
>
>
>Nancy
>(707) 251-4870 (phone)
>(707) 265-5446 (fax)
>"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>
>


TECHNICAL
N O T I F I C A T I O N
			INFORMATION SYSTEMS & SERVICES

To:

Who this affects:		Enron Energy Services Employees

		Rate Engine/Load Wizard Users

Date of Change:

Change Information:

Action:

		September 21, 2000 from 9:15 AM to 12:30 PM CDT

		Rate Engine/Load Wizard was recently unavailable due to a problem with the
server.  This has been repaired.  The server EESHOU-DBRENG for Rate
Engine/Load Wizard is now available for use.

		Please log off and back on again to access this application.

		Thank you for your cooperation!

If you have questions about the above notification, please call the
EES Tech Support Call Center at (713) 853-9797 or Toll Free at (888) 853-9797


Need more information on AES NewEnergy and Western Area Power Administration.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/12/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-12-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 05:27 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/12/2001 05:21 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mandola@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=BCBC586C-1D5A658C-862568C
D-532EF3@EX@enronXgate,
Kyle@/O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=97746094-1B0A69C0-86256945-5
803A9@EX@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-12-01

Please see attached.


i guess it is free no matter what

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 07/21/2000 09:07:46 AM
To: "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Trade

Eric,

Did you see that commissioner was free right now?
Did we get that deal?

If not, will you try to?

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 12:31 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: Trade

The 24th (2) pick and the 42nd (4) pick for your 2nd round and your 7th
round?


Elizabeth typed up these questions for us but there were a couple that got lost in the translation.  If the two with ??? next to them were yours, let me know what they are supposed to be.

I also tried to break these down evenly, I don't remember if we agreed to 3 or 4 per person but we can always cut back if we need to.  Let me know what changes need to be done and I'll fix it.

Kam


Here is a brief summary of our transaction.  I talked to Mike Coleman this
morning and he said to talk to you about this project.  Please give me a call
so Tom and I can sit down with you today to discuss the project costs of the
facility.  Thanks

Ben 3-7998


hey jason,

how is the new job?  shanna and I would like to know if you and donnita want
to do dinner again this friday? let me know

-e

Jason Bass <JBass@stdauto.com> on 02/21/2001 10:11:30 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: My new work email

Just wanted to let you know my new work email address.

Jason


There is a Treebeard's in the tunnel at 1100 Lousiana.  There isn't too much towards Enron.  I don't mind going towards your building.  You have probably been to Bucco di Bacco (sp?) over by your building. Good Italian. There is also a Cafe Express down there. I am OK with any of those.  Do you like Sushi?  There is a Miyako in the Bank One Center.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Hello!

I'm in Pennzoil at Louisiana and Rusk.  I usually meet my Enron friends at
NY Pizzeria or Ninfas, but neither sound good this week.  Do you know any
other good places in between?

To:   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
Date: 08/21/2001 04:46 PM
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
Subject:  RE: Hello!

Still good for me.  How about we meet at 12:00.  Which building are you in?
We can meet somewhere in between.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM
   To:     Nemec, Gerald
   Subject:  RE: Hello!

   Thursday still good?

   To:
   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
   cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
   Date: 08/20/2001 10:17 AM
   From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
   Subject:  RE: Hello!

   Tuesday or Thursday work for me.  Thursday is a little looser, so that
   would be better.  Let me know!

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Monday, August 20, 2001 9:16 AM
      To:     Nemec, Gerald
      Subject:  RE: Hello!

      Lunch sounds good.  Let me know what your schedule looks like for the
      rest
      of the week and I'll have a look at mine as well.

      To:
      IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
      cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
      Date: 08/17/2001 04:13 PM
      From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
      Subject:  RE: Hello!

      Hey Jen,  Thanks for the invite, but I am going to the Astros game
      tonight.
      My brother is coming in, so I got some freebie tixs for the game.  We
      ought
      to do lunch sometime next week, if you get a chance.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 3:26 PM
         To:     Nemec, Gerald
         Subject:  RE: Hello!

         What do you have going on tonight?  We have a work happy hour at
   El
         Tiempo
         tonight after work if you want to stop by.
         ...in answer to your previous question, i unfortunately cannot
   persue
      my
         dreams of skid row and loose women - my guitar is acoustic, but i
      try.
         it's much harder than it looks!

         To:

   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
         cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
         Date: 08/14/2001 11:16 AM
         From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
         Subject:  RE: Hello!

         You'll like.  It is fun once you get past some of the boring
   basics.
      I
         have been playing about 2 years.  I don't practice as much as I
      should,
         however if I turn my amp up loud enough, the noise will cover all
   my
         mistakes.  What type of music do you want to play?  Let me guess,
      Heavy
         Metal!

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Monday, August 13, 2001 4:54 PM
            To:     Nemec, Gerald
            Subject:  RE: Hello!

            Sounds cool.  My mom gave me her guitar a few months ago so I
      bought
         a
            fingering chart book (if that's what it's called - i don't
   know)
            yesterday.
            Learning guitar - This is my new project.  How long have you
   been
            playing?

            To:

      IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
            cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
            Date: 08/13/2001 03:58 PM
            From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
            Subject:  RE: Hello!

            Nothing real exciting.  After Thursday, I was a little burnt so
   I
         stayed
            home on Friday.  Saturday I just went over to a friends house.
   He
         plays
            the drums and I play a little guitar so we had a jam session
   (or
      at
            least
            we jammed as much as two corporate attorneys could).  Sunday I
      went
            furniture shopping and purchased a couch for my house.  I got
      kinda
         of
            sick
            of have no furniture in my living room. Now my house won't seem
   so
            pathetic
            when people visit.

            Yea, I have been to Teala's.  Can't say I have ever had the
   mango
            margarita
            though.  I will have to try when I get a chance.  Sounds
   fruity!!

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   jennifer.d.sanders@us.andersen.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Ed+2Esanders+40us+2Eandersen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Monday, August 13, 2001 3:12 PM
               To:     Nemec, Gerald
               Subject:  RE: Hello!

               Hey Gerald!!  The weekend was good.  I went to a wedding on
         Saturday,
               but I
               was bored almost all day Sunday.  My boyfriend and I finally
      went
         to
               Teala's (Houston's answer to Baby A's) for Ritas.  If you've
      never
            tried
               it
               - Mango would be my recommendation.  Sorry I missed you and
      your
            friends
               on
               Thursday.  I wimped out Thursday and Friday - pretty
   pathetic.
         But I
               give
               you props just for considering GK 2 weeks in a row!!  Did
   you
      do
               anything
               fun?

               To:

   IMCEANOTES-jennifer+2Esanders/40us/2Eandersen/2Ecom/40ENRON@enron.com
               cc:     (bcc: Jennifer D. Sanders)
               Date: 08/13/2001 01:39 PM
               From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
               Subject:  RE: Hello!

               Hi Jennifer,  How was your weekend?  Did you do anything
      exciting?
         I
               was
               invited to go with some friends to the GK on Friday night,
   but
      I
            thought
               that two Fridays in a row would be pushing my luck, so I
   begged
         off.

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
      sole
         use
            of
               the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
            disclosure
               by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply to Enron Corp. at
      enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
         and
               delete
               all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
         hereto)
            are
               not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************

               *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
               Footer*******************

               Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this
         message.
               If
               you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
         responsible
            for
               delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or
         deliver
               this
               message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this
      message
         and
               kindly
               notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately
   if
      you
         or
               your
               employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of
   this
         kind.
               Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
      that
         do
            not
               relate to the official business of my firm shall be
   understood
      as
               neither
               given nor endorsed by it.

            *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
            Footer*******************

            Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this
      message.
            If
            you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
      responsible
         for
            delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or
      deliver
            this
            message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this
   message
      and
            kindly
            notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if
   you
      or
            your
            employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this
      kind.
            Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
   that
      do
         not
            relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood
   as
            neither
            given nor endorsed by it.

         *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
         Footer*******************

         Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this
   message.
         If
         you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
   responsible
      for
         delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or
   deliver
         this
         message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
   and
         kindly
         notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you
   or
         your
         employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this
   kind.
         Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that
   do
      not
         relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
         neither
         given nor endorsed by it.

      *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
      Footer*******************

      Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
      If
      you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
   for
      delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
      this
      message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
      kindly
      notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
      your
      employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
      Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do
   not
      relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
      neither
      given nor endorsed by it.

   *******************Internet Email Confidentiality
   Footer*******************

   Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
   If
   you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
   delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
   this
   message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
   kindly
   notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or
   your
   employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
   Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
   relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as
   neither
   given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Bernard,

My coordinates:

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone: (713) 853 3848
 (713) 410 5396 (cell)
Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com

Yes, we are going into a very interesting summer both here and in the UK.

Vince

"Murphy, Bernard" <Bernard.Murphy@caminus.com> on 03/27/2001 01:23:04 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Thesis on Electricity Price Jump-Diffusions

Hi Vince,

Can you e-mail me your mailing address in Houston and I will send you a hard
copy of the above today.  Apologies for delay, but I wanted to ensure that
Les Clewlow had received his copy in Sydney before distributing any other
copies.

Incidentally, today (March 27th) is a red letter day in the UK as the NETA /
new electricity trading arrangements have gone 'live'.  Should be
interesting to observe the development of the paper market in the coming
months - you're no doubt aware that IPE have just launched an electricity
futures contract.

Regards

Bernard

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 01 March 2001 15:37
To: Murphy, Bernard
Cc: vkaminski@aol.com; Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: RE: 1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Bernard,

Yes, I can  read a DVI file. You can also  cc
my home address: Vkaminski@aol.com. I shall
try to send you an answer to your question on weekend.

Vince

"Murphy, Bernard" <Bernard.Murphy@caminus.com> on 03/01/2001 09:18:58 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: 1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Vince,

I can send you a Scientific Word DVI file (at the weekend) if you can read
SCientific Word files ?  The dissertation hasn't been reviewed by Les or
the
External yet - although its been at FORC for 2 months. I think that the
Empirical Chapter is probably the one which would be of most relevance to
both our company's businesses - although I ultimately didn't have the time
to 'explicitly' price the jump risk-premium which I conjectured is possibly
implicit in the prices of exchange-traded electricity futures-options -
rather I developed an implicit estimation procedure which will enable a
rough assessment (with a little bit of further work, but not too much) be
made of the price of jump risk in wholesale power markets.

In other words, I assumed spot jump-risk to be undiversifiable, and
essentially devoted 2 Theoretical Chapters to :

1) proving that a jump-diffusion trading model is "incomplete"
(synthesising
the securities markets framework with martingale representation theory) -
note that I did not assume that markets could be dynamically completed with
'term structure' securities as in the HJM w/ jumps papers of Shirakawa and
Das and;

2) deriving an explicit risk-adjustment process for 'implementing' the
price
of jump-risk using a jump-diffusion marginal indirect utility of wealth
process (ie. a jump-augmented production economy approach in the spirit of
CIR, Bates, Ahn & Thompson).

Incidentally, I would be keen to find out if you or any of your team done
much work on real-asset valuations in a spark-spread option-valuation
framework ?  I'm about to start a project evaluation of embedded
optionality, and have a dilemna whether I should model the spot or forward
gas / power price processes.  With the former, I can model mean-reversion
and jumps explicitly (obviously, important for capturing the optionality of
out-of-the-money plant, which might otherwise be ignored in a
pure-diffusion
framework) but am not maximising the informational content of the available
market data (that is, assuming there was a long-term market forward curve
for electricity); whereas in the latter the driftless forward supposition
means that I have to capture mean-reversion via the futures volatility
function, and jumps are less easy to calibrate.  Any suggestions ?

Regards

Bernard

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 01 March 2001 14:54
To: Murphy, Bernard
Cc: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com; Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: 1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Bernard,

I am forwarding your message to my assistant and she will mail you a
reprint.
I would be glad to take a look at your dissertation. Is it available as a
publication, working paper?

Vince

"Murphy, Bernard" <Bernard.Murphy@caminus.com> on 03/01/2001 02:17:39 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Hello Vince,

My name is Bernard Murphy - I received your e-mail address from Les
Clewlow,
who was my PhD supervisor at the Financia Options Research Centre at
Warwick
Business School.  I've just finished my PhD on Electricity Price Jump
Diffusions :  A Theoretical and Empirical Study in Incomplete Markets -
hence my interest in electricity price modelling and derivative pricing.  I
was looking to get hold of a copy of your 1997 paper, which has recently
come to my attention :

"The Challenge of Pricing & Risk-Managing Electricity Derivatives", The US
POwer Market, Risk Publications, pp. 149-171.

and Les suggested that I contact you directly (Les is travelling at present
and doesn't have an electronic copy available) to request an e-copy.

Incidentally, I am Lecturer in Finance / Financial Mathematics at
University
of Limerick (Ireland) and have taken a year out to work for Caminus UK,
where I am working on introducing and developing a markets-based approach
(spark-spread) to real asset valuations in the UK power industry.

Thanks in advancve

Bernard Murphy


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

	Jo Corbitt @ ENRON
	08/08/2000 03:14 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bi-Weekly Meeting w/ Research 8/22

Please be advised that Mr. Rick Buy will NOT attend the
Bi-Weekly Meeting with Research on Tuesday, August 22.

Thank you.


Mark Taylor has a one-way messaging pager.

to leave a numeric message:  1-877-855-2081

To send an email message:  8778552081@pagenetmessage.net

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
Dear  SmartReminders Member,
       [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]

We respect  your privacy and are a Certified Participant of the BBBOnLine
 Privacy Program.  To be removed from future offers,click  here.
SmartReminders.com  is a permission based service. To unsubscribe click  here .


Good morning Richard:

Your resume was forwarded to Vince Kaminski and the Research group
and they would like to conduct a telephone interview with you at your
convenience.

Please give me some dates and times that you would be available and
I will coordinate the schedule.  Also, the telephone number you wish to be
contacted at.

The telephone interview will be last approximately an hour and the
interviewers would be:

Vince Kaminski  Managing Director, Research
Stinson Gibner  Vice President, Research
Vasant Shanbhogue Vice President, Research

Thanks Richard and we look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713-853-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Susan,
 I find that you have a midly attractive sense of humor and a cynical side to
you that separates you from the rest of the tribe.  Its funny you mentioned
the Astros game.  I was actually thinking of inviting you (since I have two
tickets to tonight's game and all) but you have turned me down so many times
in the past I decided to go with a more conservative pick.  Anyhow, since I
absolutely detest Woody's and all of my bold suggestions for other venues
consistently gets dissed by the group's brain trust, please take me off of
this distribution list.  Have a nice day.

Steve

Susan M Scott@ECT
03/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: val.generes@ac.com, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shanna
Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yvette Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
Feather/Enron_Development@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Alon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson
Kriegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Take me out to the ...

Oh wait, I can't go to the ball game because I couldn't take a day off from
work to stand in the Enron lobby (or send my secretary to do it for me).

For all of you who have managed to snag tickets for tonight's game
congratulations and you suck.  For the rest of us stuck out in the cold I
suggest the only viable alternative before us is to drown our sorrows in a
cold bottle of beer (or two, or three...).  I realize the mass email has been
MIA the last two weeks.  For some this may have been a welcomed relief.  For
others there may have been some concern that they had been cut-off from the
distribution.  At present no one has been removed from the distribution, but
it is undergoing an audit.  Should it be determined that it is necessary to
remove an individual from the list for any reason that individual will be
notified and given an explanation.  If anyone would like to know the causes
for expulsion you can write to:  I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE CARES IF THERE ON
THIS DISTRIBUTION OR NOT BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE WE SEEM TO GO IS WOODY'S
EVERY THURSDAY BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:00.

On that note, see you guys at Woody's tonight around 9:30 or 10:00.


I talked to Mike Smith and he agrees this is a commercial problem.   Really
nothing for us to do directly other than minimize exit fees, etc.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/16/2001 09:20 PM

		 To: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@EES
		 cc: Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X

We'll need to discuss further internally, but they may be correct in their
assessment.

Best,
Jeff

	Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	02/16/2001 07:03 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X

From further discussions with UC/CSU, it appears their primary concern
relative to Enron's decision to De-DASR their accounts is that they have lost
their "direct access" status, and are again a bundled utility customer.

Jeff - what impacts does this status have with respect to the ban language of
AB-1X?  And with SB-27X, will they now encumber costs to become a direct
access customer that they would not have been liable for had Enron not made
the decision to return them to utility supply?

Your input is appreciated.  Please shed some light here as soon as possible.

Regards - Tom Riley


If you could go ahead and fax that to 503-464-3740, I'll have Mike take a
look at it.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   01/17/2001 07:06 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 495443.01

Kate,
We received an executed Confirmation Letter back from Cominco, Ltd. -- Mike
Swerzbin trade
The cp has made an addition to our Delivery point:  BC Border
they have placed "at or near Nelway, B.C. via Waneta Switching Station and 71
Line (Northern Intertie)

Please let me know if this is acceptable and if Mike Swerzbin agrees, I can
fax you the document, juts need your closest fax number.   Thank you
Stephanie


Justin Rostant
EnronOnline LLC.
Phone: 713-853-6460
Mobile: 832-264-6333
Fax: 713-646-2126

<Embedded Microsoft Excel Worksheet>


Dee:   I'm in the midst of a closing; can you email language to me?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I am ok so long as the firm would never pursue litigation against Enron -- on that basis I would grant the waiver.  Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Douglas, Stephen H.
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	Conflict Waiver

I have periodically received requests from Andy Kramer in the form of the attached.  How should I address this issue?  I would not want to provide a waiver that may otherwise raise an issue for Enron.  Thanks in advance for your guidance.  SHD. << File: McDermott Will Waiver.DOC >>


thanks.  It amazes me how many people saw C-span ... I thought it was just
for junkies like us.  I would like to get together in DC.  I don't have a
date scheduled yet, but I seem to get there every other week or so.

	Jim Schultz <jschultz@steel.org>
	02/05/2001 07:08 AM

		 To: "Steve Kean (E-mail)" <skean@enron.com>
		 cc: Jim Schultz <jschultz@steel.org>
		 Subject: Senate Energy Hearing

Steve,

Caught your performance on C span over the weekend by accident covering the
Senate hearings last Wednesday. You did a great job. I think Sen Murkowski
gets it, but many of the others clearly do not.

I know it's a little late but wanted to thank you for your informative
comments at our Senior managers meeting last November in California. This
energy situation really has our CEO's attention and we are considering the
formation of a new industrial users coalition to promote sound comprehensive
energy policy. Just users.

If you're in Washington and have some spare time, which neither of us ever
do, it would be great to have a lunch or something. As you know, we are
active on the hill and at FERC and DOE. On most issues, I am sure our
positions are the same.

Again, thank for your help with our Senior management. Hope to see you again
sometime.

Jim Schultz
American Iron & Steel Institute
202-452-7180, 202-463-6573F
jschultz@steel.org