The state code modfied by AB 1X will be subject to new proposed modfications
in SB 8X.  Language is expected soon.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/21/2001 04:27
PM ---------------------------

"Robert Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com> on 03/21/2001 04:14:37 PM
To: roger Yang <RYY@mrwassoc.com>, bill Monsen <wam@mrwassoc.com>, Duane
Nelsen <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Brian Cragg
<BCragg@gmssr.com>
cc:

Subject: fyi

Wednesday, March 21, 2001 Rash power bill may need fix By Will Shuck
From our Sacramento Bureau SACRAMENTO Even as lawmakers lament the slow pace
of solving California's energy crisis, the cost of haste has cropped up in
their first major act, a multibillion dollar measure that put the state in
the power-buying business.

 Rate cut expected to open doors for spenders
 Power: Left in the dark
 Blackouts threaten sick
 Sonic boom may be shuttle
 L.B., L.A. sue gas firms for conspiracy
 Police deploy tire spikes to end pursuit
 Death urged in Grinder trial
 Funeral to be held for teen-ager
 Rash power bill may need fix
 L.B. trash plant keeps burning
 P-T drops price back to 25 cents
 Sub skipper blames errors by himself, crew

AB1X, the highly touted bill that put California in the power-buying
business, may have been so rashly crafted that it will take another piece of
legislation to fix it, an influential senator said Tuesday.
At issue is vague wording that makes it unclear when and to what extent
Southern California Edison and other utilities have to repay the state for
buying power.
State Sen. Debra Bowen, chairwoman of the Senate Energy, Utilities and
Communications Committee, said the bill apparently has left room for utility
lawyers to argue that their companies needn't repay the state until they have
covered other costs.
But Bowen, a Redondo Beach Democrat who represents downtown and western Long
Beach, said "the legislative intent is crystal clear" that the state wanted
to be repaid directly for supplying about a third of the power utility
companies deliver to their customers.
"We need a cleanup bill" to set the matter straight, she said.
Although AB1X illustrates the flaws that come with speed, Bowen said, the
Legislature can't afford to delay.
"I think we are much too slow in our response," she said. "But that has to be
balanced against things we've done in a tearing hurry and then have had to
fix later."
No matter what the Legislature does in the coming weeks, she said, California
is in for a tough summer, and only determined conservation efforts will put
much of a dent in a precarious supply-demand equation.


Start Date: 10/19/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101921.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Attached is the syllabus for E248. Professor Hartman will let us know if
there is material to prepare for next week, and we will let you know. I
thought it would be helpful for some of you that are interested in the
content to see the syllabus in the meantime.

_________________________________________
Shawn Allison, Associate Director
Evening MBA Program, Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Tel (510) 643-0435 Fax (510) 643-5902

 - e296jan2000.doc


I'm sorry that you didn't sleep well.  I hope it wasn't because I called
you last night-although I'm sure that it didn't help.  It rained really
hard here too, but I was so tired that it didn't wake me up much.

It'll be nice to see you on Saturday.  I probably will party on Friday
too!  I can't wait!

3 and a half more days.....

Love you,
Jenn


It seems that 2 p.m. p.s.t. works best for all for a conference call.  The
call-in number is 888-311-9051 passcode is 60396.

The agenda would be to discuss:

1.  interconnection agreements
2.  tax implications of c-corp vs. llp


How was your morning?  I hope not too bad.  I didn't get to sleep until 3am.
I miss you and love you.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
09:45 AM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
10/25/2000 09:19 AM
To: "Amanda Barnard" <ajbarnard@houston.rr.com>, Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT,
"derek campbell" <derek.campbell@paslode.com>, PMDESMAR@earthlink.net, Linda
J Ewing/HOU/ECT@ECT, maxnbev@wesnet.com (Max Fledderjohann), "garynkay"
<GARYWGARRETT@email.msn.com>, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
HeightsHappy@aol.com @ ENRON, "Keeling, Ingelisa" <ikeeling@velaw.com>, "B.
Kenne" <yona_edoda@yahoo.com> @ ENRON, plmichaud <plmichaud@pdq.net>, "Ray
Vincent" <raylvincent@hotmail.com> @ ENRON, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
Zajicek <e.zajicek@pentasafe.com>, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: taxclaity.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 09:18
AM ---------------------------

"Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com> on 10/25/2000 09:14:08 AM
To: "'Brad Baker'" <bbaker@mesh.net>, "'Brad Levy'" <brad_levy@compusa.com>,
"'Brendan O'Brien'" <brendano@crossmk.com>, "Michael, Chris"
<cmichael@txi.com>, "'Darrell Brown'" <dkbrown2@flash.net>, "'Dawn Wilson'"
<Dawn.C.Kenne@enron.com>, "'Fred Silva'" <silvauh60@aol.com>, "'Gary Wilson'"
<R.Wilson@oracle.com>, "Spindler, Jenny" <jspindler@txi.com>, "'John
Belcher'" <johnbe@microsoft.com>, "'John Everett'"
<john_b_everett@email.mobil.com>, "'John Stefek'" <stefek@onramp.net>,
"'Karen Hendrix'" <karen.hendrix@biin.com>, "'Kevin Kalis'"
<kkalistx@hotmail.com>, "'Kristin and Darrell Herbel'" <KUAlums@aol.com>,
"'Matt Louk'" <sigmaxaa@ix.netcom.com>, "'Mike'" <mike@bythewood.com>, "'Mike
Parker'" <MParker173@aol.com>, "'Mitch'" <mitch4269@hci.net>, "'Philip
Stavens'" <pstavens@flash.net>, "'Roger @ Home'" <gbythewood@aol.com>, "'Sal
Navarro'" <JANSAL@aol.com>, "'Sandra Dial'" <sdial@ix.netcom.com>, "'Scott
Martin'" <scotta@wt.net>, "'Scott Spindler'" <Sdspindler@aol.com>, "'Shelly'"
<rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "'Steve Dillard'" <steve_dillard@matrixes.com>, "'Tim
and Missy'" <Tim_Holmes@intgate.rbfalcon.com>, "'Tim Holmes'"
<tholmes@intgate.rbfalcon.com>, "'Tom Collier'" <tgcollier@msn.com>, "'Wally
Gomaa'" <wally.gomaa@gwl.com>, Brendan Obrien <brenman@ix.netcom.com>, Chris
Michael <cmichael@txi.com>, Don Copeland <donald.copeland@telops.gte.com>,
Doug Webb <dwebb2@pdq.net>, Garrett Goeters <garrett.goeters@compaq.com>,
Gary Wilson <R.Wilson@oracle.com>, Juan Harris <JHarris914@aol.com>, Kevin
Cooper <Kevin.Cooper@txdps.state.tx.us>, Nathan Reese <nreese@mindspring.com>
cc:

Subject: taxclaity.com

This is a cool site comparing the Bush and Gore tax plans.  Click on the
link below and follow the instructions to see which plan saves you the most
money.

RB

http://www.taxclarity.com

Richard Bythewood
Dallas Office:          972-647-3930
Mobile:                   817-925-6128
e-mail:                   rbythewood@txi.com


Here is Sara's itinerary if you need to contact her while she is on
vacation.  The reservations are under the name "Michael McKeogh".

Oct. 6 & 7 Holland Hotel  915-837-3455

Oct. 8,9,10 Vintage Inn  707-944-1112

Oct. 11,12, 13 Campton Place Hotel 415-781-5555


Are you going to have Mark Palmer do his usual thing for this?

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cannon, Lydia   On Behalf Of Zipper, Andy
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Forster, David; Bridges, Michael; Shults, Bob; Diamond, Daniel; Staffel, Jake; Allario, John; Pavetto, John; Haney, Mike; Pacheco, Leonardo; Carter, Carl
Cc:	Piper, Greg; Palmer, Mark S.; Zipper, Andy; Becker, Lorraine
Subject:	Origination Meeting

"Please attend an origination meeting on Tuesday, May 29  from 8:30 to 10:00, location EB2751.  The focus of this meeting will doing a walkthrough of an EnronOnline demo for both EnronOnline hosted products and X-online hosted environments. This demo will cover all relevant functionality of the system, similar to what we have been presenting to GM et al."

Thanks,

Andy Zipper


Please find attached the EEOS / NEPCO weekly project update for week ending
June 1, 2001.

If you have any questions, you can call me at (713) 646-6106.

Mark


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
09:02 AM ---------------------------

Laird Dyer
04/27/2000 01:17 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SW Gas

Mike McDonald and I met with SW Gas this morning.  They were polite regarding
asset management and procurement function outsourcing and are willing to
listen to a proposal.  However, they are very interested in weather hedges to
protect throughput related earnings.  We are pursuing a confidentiality
agreement with them to facilitate the sharing of information that will enable
us to develop proposals.  Our pitch was based upon enhancing shareholder
value by outsourcing a non-profit and costly function (procurement) and by
reducing the volatility of their earnings by managing throughput via a
weather product.

As to your other question.  We have yet to identify or pursue other
candidates; however, Mike McDonald and I are developing a coverage strategy
to ensure that we meet with all potential entities and investigate our
opportunities.  We met with 8 entities this week (7 Municipals and SWG) as we
implement our strategy in California.

Are there any entities that you think would be interested in an asset
management deal that we should approach?  Otherwise, we intend to
systematically identify and work through all the candidates.

Laird


At Enron, we're good at a lot of things:  making markets, commoditizing products, managing risk, offering innovative energy solutions to customers - the list goes on and on.  However, one of the things we could do a lot better is watching our expenses.  We're all shareholders in this company, and we need to spend our company's dollars as wisely as we spend our own.

There are some simple, yet significant measures each of us can take to make sure we're careful with Enron's money.  The Policy Committee has approved and recommended the following:

?	Professional Services - This is our largest area of discretionary spending, at more than $600 million last year. "Professional Services" includes our contracts with outside law and accounting firms, contractors and other consulting groups.  To make sure that we are negotiating the best rates and terms of service for the company across business units, we are requiring all future professional service contracts and those up for renewal to be negotiated through or in consultation with Global Strategic Sourcing (GSS), effective July 1.  In addition, contracts for more than $5,000 must be pre-approved by the business unit senior executive or their designee and GSS.  For more information, see http://ibuyit.enron.com.

?	On-line expense reporting tool XMS - XMS, our online expense reporting tool, enables us to expedite, monitor and report expenses.  Effective July 1, all employees on domestic U.S. payroll will be required to use XMS for reimbursement of business-related expenses. To access XMS, go to http://xms.enron.com/.

?	Enterprise wide portal - We currently have 122 internal web sites across the company.  The amount of technology work, marketing collateral, and other related costs required to develop and support so many portals is sizeable.  It makes sense to have one Enron portal so you can efficiently access content and services through a single, personalized channel that will make it easier for you to find information and perform basic tasks online.  This new company-wide portal, under the leadership of Tony Mends, will be launched in several phases beginning this fall.

Another significant area where we can be more diligent in our spending is travel and entertainment.  Enron has long had travel policies in place.  As we have grown, we have not done as well as we should have in communicating those policies to new employees and reminding all employees to take advantage of the discounts we have negotiated.  The availability of discounts and booking services online should make it easy to save money for the company without sacrificing the comfort of employees who travel.  The following are common sense recommendations that we should all adhere to when traveling for business.  Any regular deviations from these travel policy recommendations will be reviewed by each business unit leader.

?	Air travel - Employees are requested to use either Travel Agency in the Park (TAP) or the GSS-approved preferred travel agency for your location - all of which have access to the significant airfare discounts negotiated by GSS - or http://clicktrip.enron.com/enron, the new online travel booking service that allows employees to book their own travel with the same negotiated discounts.  Employees who fly in the United States should book non-refundable coach tickets, which are typically 65 percent less than refundable tickets and can usually be changed by simply paying a $100 fee.  For this reason, we strongly encourage all employees to purchase non-refundable domestic coach tickets when possible.

?	Lodging - GSS has also negotiated preferred rates at a number of hotel chains in many cities worldwide to accommodate each business unit's individual hotel policy.  We recommend that you use Enron's list of preferred hotels to select accommodations that are in line with your business unit's policies.  You can view the list at http://travel.enron.com.

?	Car rental services - When renting a car for business travel, employees should use our preferred car rental agencies - National (U.S. and Canada) and Alamo (U.S.)- since the agreements we have negotiated are intended to protect you and Enron through the insurance coverage in our contract.  Visit http://travel.enron.com for details and updates to services available outside the U.S.

?	Off-site meetings - All domestic-U.S. off-site meetings and events with more than 10 people should be coordinated through GSS, which will negotiate preferred rates for Enron.  They can be reached at (713) 646-8311.

Because there are differences between business units and offices, each business unit leader will follow up this memo with a communication further elaborating on these policies as they apply to their business unit.

Each of us has a responsibility to make sure we do our part to ensure Enron retains its competitive edge.  These recommendations are some basic, sensible actions we can take company-wide, but it is up to every employee to look for cost saving measures and do what makes sense in your daily activities.  If you have an idea or a suggestion you would like to share with us, please e-mail us at recommendationsforcostsavings@enron.com.   A list of questions and answers about these policies is posted on http://ibuyit.enron.com/gss/ibuyit/csfaq.doc.  If you have additional questions, Policy Committee member Kevin Hannon will host an eSpeak on Tuesday, June 19 at 10 a.m. Houston time to discuss these cost saving recommendations.


Your a most welcome.   I would like to see the doc they sign to see if they
accepted our remarks.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


One of our buds at Mission advises that they intend to "perform strictly to
contract" on  our Confirm #1 ending May 31, then claim us in default and
cancel any tons not shipped.  Mission then intend to be the customer from
hell on the second confirm for shipments through June 2001.

Mission was less then enthusiastic about our offer of USD 13.7 mm to buy down
the contract.  Instead they obviously intend to frustrate the contract
through non-performance by virtue of a strict interpretation of their
obligation to accept..

My thought is to go to them with a "no harm - no foul" settlement that  will
cancel the balance of the tons under the first confirm, waive any claims we
have due to vessel demurrage, extra handling costs, them being jerks, etc. in
return for a blanket bilateral agreement that neither of us has any claims
against the other for deliveries made under Confirm #1.  In return they agree
to accept certain minimum levels of tonnage on a weekly basis at their
stations under Confirm #2, and promise to play nice in the future.

This would allow us to mark the LBT "over charge" we are holding of about USD
8 mm now gathering dust, and will give us a pretty good reason to mark the
forward "over charge" for LBT shipments to be made against Confirm #2.

Mission will think they are screaming studs - having knocked us to our knees,
while in reality we walk away with their money.  Sounds like a win-win to
me.  Also sounds like something we need to pass by you lawyer types.

Thoughts?


----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 10:36 AM -----

	Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	12/04/2000 04:54 PM

		 To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Connected Newsletter: EBS employee meeting

----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 12/04/00 04:59 PM
-----

	EBS Connected
	Sent by: EBS Announcements
	11/30/00 05:51 PM

		 To: All EBS Employees Worldwide
		 cc:
		 Subject: Connected Newsletter

November 30, 2000

Enron Media Services Signs First Physical Advertising Trade
As was recently announced, EBS has added advertising space and time to its
portfolio of commodities traded through Enron Media Services.  We are pleased
to report that we have signed our first physical advertising trade.  It is
valued at $1.3 million and will cover a three-year time frame.  Due to a
counterparty confidentiality clause, we cannot disclose the client,s name.
Congratulations to the Enron Media Services group.

EBS Partners with eterniTV and iPIX
EBS has agreed to deliver broadband content for eterniTV and Internet
Pictures Corporation (iPIX). A leading business-to-business video service,
eterniTV provides high-quality streaming content in the form of short videos
to e-Business web sites. IPIX, a leader in dynamic imaging solutions,
delivers rich media to thousands of Internet sites for a broad array of
industries.

EBS Streams International Cricket Tournament
The Coca-Cola Trophy 2000 Cricket Tournament  held October 20 through October
29 in Sharajah, United Arab Emirates  was webcast live to Internet users over
the Enron Network.  WorldTel, one of the world,s leading marketing and
production companies for the sport, carried live audio and video coverage of
the Sharajah matches on its web site.  The tournament reached 165,000 viewers
worldwide with 60 percent of those using a &broadband8 connection.  This
surpassed Enron,s earlier Cricket webcast of 142,000 viewers in March.

Introducing the Enron Network
The Enron Network icon is now what customers see when they view high-quality
streams delivered through our network. Replacing the &ePower8 logo and
verbiage in all communication, this icon represents an enhanced online
experience. In place of ePowerOnline, our Extranet is now called
EnronNetworkOnline.  ISPs that were formerly &ePowered8 are referred to as
ISPs that are &connected to the Enron Network.8

To facilitate the Enron Network logo, please remove all ePower logos and
related verbiage from all external and internal communication.  If you need
assistance in converting language from ePower to Enron Network, please
contact Janet Johnson, director, EBS Marketing Communication, at extension
6-2011.

Great &PULSE8 Results
A big thanks to EBS employees for responding to the "PULSE" all-employee
survey.  An impressive 68 percent of EBS employees responded.  Survey results
are in and will be analyzed over the next several weeks.  EBS employees will
hear more about the survey results and next steps in late January.

EBS Holiday Parties Are Just Around the Corner
The holidays are quickly approaching.  Be sure to mark your calendar for the
EBS holiday celebration coming to a city near you:

London )      Date: Friday, December 1
         Place: Le Meridian, Piccadilly Circus
         Time: 7:30 p.m.  -  Midnight
         Attire: James Bond vs. Charlie,s Angels

Portland )    Date: Friday, December 1
         Place: Marriott Hotel, 1401 S. W. Naito Parkway
         Time: 7:00 p.m.  -  Midnight
         Attire: Holiday Festive

Houston )    Date: Saturday, December 2
         Place: Jags Restaurant, 5120 Woodway at Sage Road
         Time: 7:00 p.m.  -   Midnight
         Attire: Black Tie Optional

Pleasanton ) Date: Friday, December 15
Place: Commodore Cruise Line, SS Chardonnay, Mariner Square in Alameda
(Mariner Drive)
          Time: Board 7:00 p.m. ) Cruise Time: 7:30 p.m.  -   Midnight
                     Attire: Black Tie Optional

Stateside, so that our festive moods live on, a professional photographer
will be at each party to capture our holiday memories.

As these are the official &Enron sponsored8 holiday parties, so we hope that
you can join in and spread holiday cheer with your co-workers.  We encourage
everyone to participate in these company-wide events.  If employees choose to
hold other departmental parties in addition to the official holiday parties,
any related costs will be the responsibility of employees and will not be
reimbursed.

EBS-United States will dispense two drink tickets per guest at the door.  In
addition, wine will be served and a cash bar is available.

See you there.

Employee Meetings Fast Approaching
As the year comes to a close, we want to take an opportunity to acknowledge
our accomplishments and look ahead to 2001.  We've scheduled the following
employee meetings.

Friday, Dec 1  PORTLAND    2:30 -  3:30 p.m. (PST)
   Ken Rice, Kevin Hannon,
   Jim Crowder & Ted Seitz
   River Place Hotel
   McCall Room

Tuesday, Dec 5 HOUSTON     11:00 - 12:00 noon (CST)
PLEASANTON (via Videoconference) 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. (PST)
Ken Rice & Kevin Hannon
   Doubletree Hotel
   LaSalle B

Enron Offices Closing for the Holidays
The year is coming to an end, and the Enron offices will be closed on the
following days:
Monday, December 25 & Tuesday, December 26 ) Christmas
Monday, January 1 ) New Year,s Day
Have a festive and safe holiday season.

PRC Timeline
The year-end PRC process is well underway.  The timeline for the PRC
activities is as follows:

November 17-Deadline to submit feedback
November 20-Departmental PRC meetings begin
November 28-EBS Analyst/Associate pre-rating meeting
December 13 & 14-EBS final PRC meeting
? Commercial-Manager and above
? Commercial support, technical, specialized technical-Director and above
January 5, 8, & 9-Enron final VP and MD PRC
February 1-Deadline for performance reviews and forms returned to HR
February 1-Effective date of promotions
February 5-Bonuses distributed


On Saturday, 11/17, the Operational Announcements  state that both Roseton units would be committed for Local  Reliability on Sunday.  I have two questions concerning this  commitment; 1) What happened after SCUC ran that required two 600 mw units be  put on at minimum?  2) Since the local Transmission Owner didn't request  these units on, why is it referred to as Local Reliability?  There is a  substantial amount of uplift generated ( no pun intended ) by this decision and  when the term Local Reliability is used it raises a question as to the  allocation of this cost.


<meta name="description" content="The Computer Products Superstore. Supplying the world since 1984 with guaranteed lowest prices, huge inventory, easy ordering, and super fast service.">
<title>PROVANTAGE.COM : The Original Advantage</title>

<map name="FPMap0">
      <area href="http://www.provantage.com" shape="rect" coords="437, 3, 589, 43"></map>

          November 05, 2001

Can't
            read this email? Click
            here

          Issue#:
            e10211

To
            unsubscribe from the

            Original Advantage Click
      here

            (Do Not Reply to this email)

          PROVANTAGE
            Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

<!VR>
<!EVR>

Products that
give you the Professional Advantage!

New Listing!

VPW500 50in Plasma Display 1280x1024
By ViewSonic

ViewSonic's VPW500 provides the ultimate in a high-performance display _ exactly what you expect from the Display Technology leader. The VPW500 is remarkably <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $7883.61

New!

Windows XP Step-By-Step LIMITED EDITION
By Microsoft

Personal training system; easy step by step lessons & practice exercises for learning Windows XP

350+ pages with 1 CD. For beginning <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $13.78

New!

Personal Audio Player 3000
By Intel

With up to two hours of outstanding audio you can experience clear, solid, skip-free music. Create your own mixes and dress up your look with design-it-yourself <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $129.06

BrightStor ARCserve 2000 Workgroup Edition
By Computer Associates

Industry's most advanced storage solution delivers comprehensive data protection for Windows NT/2000 environments.

  $417.48

KVM Switch Cable Kit PS/2 10-Foot
By Linksys

The Linksys ProConnect CPU Switch Cables allow you to effortlessly connect a computer's monitor, keyboard, and mouse to the Linksys ProConnect CPU Switch. <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $22.26

4-Port Cable/DSL Internet Gateway
By D-Link

Purchase a DI-704 between November 1, 2001 through December 31 , 2001 and receive a <BIG>$30.00</BIG> mail-in rebate! <nobr>
...More</nobr>

  $89.51

ML320 Turbo 9-Pin Narrow 290CPS 120V
By Okidata

Microline 320 and 321 Turbo

Tank-Tough reliability, expanded head gap and zero-tear capability for dedicated forms printing. This 9-pin dot matrix <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $325.69

New!

PowerShot G2 4.0MeagPixel 3x Optical 11x Digital Z
By Canon

Canon's new PowerShot G2 is a precise and powerful tool for professional and advanced amateur photographers who want a very high-resolution digital camera <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $822.31

NVIDIA TNT2 PCI M64 32MB-SDRAM 128 Bit 3D Graphics
By Pine

If you've got integrated AGP graphics that are simply not up to the job, or an older system without an AGP slot, then this is a perfect solution.  Using <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $42.73

New Listing!

USB Floppy Drive for Mac & PC
By Imation

The Imation USB Floppy Drive for Macintosh and PC is designed to easily add a floppy disk drive to a Mac or PC with a USB port. Its simple, one cable connection, <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $55.39

New!

PenCam 2 for USB
By Aiptek

3-in-1 XGA camera! 2.5 times bigger picture resolution than the PenCam Trio VGA For USB & Windows 2000, 98, Me & XP.

Built-In <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $63.75

80mm Case Fan DC (4-Pin Male) Brushless
By Antec

Features
Extend CPU life
Increase hot air exhaustion
Advanced design of twin air tube and dual sleeve bearing fan
Extendable air tube <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $4.05

TRIMpak CD Clear Storage Cases 200-Pack
By Verbatim

When it comes to storing & transporting CDs, the choice is clear - TRIMpak - Thinner, lighter & more durable than plastic jewel boxes.

Far <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $37.59

New!

Stylus Color C80 Ink Jet 17ppm 2880x720dpi Black U
By Epson

Purchase an Epson C80 Ink Jet Printer before December 31, 2001 and receive a <big>$30.00</big> Mail-In Rebate!

...<nobr>More</nobr>

  $146.66

Web
      Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com

       Toll Free: 800-336-1166     Fax:
330-494-5260     email: sales@provantage.com

        Privacy
        Policy | Terms &
        Conditions | FREE
        Catalog

©2001
        PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

    Products,
        prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time. Company
        and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered trademarks
        of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be copyrighted
        by the product's manufacturer.

        The
        Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
        PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in
        the past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout
        process. Or, customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email
        List" box on the PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any time by going
        to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm.
        The email address is permanently removed from additional promotional
        electronic mailings, and will not be reactivated unless requested by the
        customer.


ADMINISTRATIVE

Houston, Crisis Management Plans - Donnie Willmann and Marysol Martinez are evaluating responses from the international facilities to determine which facilities have a written Crisis Management Plan. Enron Corp EHS staff will assist those facilities that do not have a plan in the development of the Crisis Plan

EUROPE

Poland, ENS Power Plant - Alan Stringer conducted a gap analysis of the status of implementation of Enron Guidelines and identified that 80% of the guidelines would be in place by the time of the facility audit is conducted next week by Chuck Goode audit team.

ENRON GLOBAL ASSETS

Venezuela, Vengas, Calife, Accroven - Edgar Zuleta  conducted Smith Driving Training and conducted EHS audits  at Vengas and Calife.

Argentina, TGS - Henry Van discussed with Florentino Tobares and Enrique Rolando of TGS the verification and certification requirements for obtaining methane emission credits should TGS decide to implement a fugitive methane emissions testing program.

CAPITAL PROJECTS

Yamaguchi Power Station (Ube, Japan)-  This proposal is for a site in southern Japan that would be a 1,400 MW coal-fired plant, with the coal being shipped to the site.  Joe Kolb completed his review of a draft of the environmental impact assessment scoping document, sent by Alan Stringer, for the Yamaguchi Power Station in Ube, Japan.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS

Corporate Responsibility Annual Report - The 2000 Corporate Responsibility Annual Report is located on the web at <http://ehs.corp.enron.com> Susan Worthen is awaiting final revisions to the distribution list.  Lauren Iannarone is drafting cover letters for Ken Lay.

Environmental Emerging Issues Database/Social Responsibility Risk Assessment Tool: Gavin Dillingham demonstrated the database to a group of EHS employees this morning. He is now waiting to be notified whether or not this database will be developed further.

ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES GROUP

Emissions Trading - Ontario, Canada Proposal:  Lisa Jacobson coordinated the drafting and submission of comments to Ontario in response to its proposed emissions trading program. Comments were coordinated with, ENA Canada, EGM Emissions and Government Affairs, as the proposal could impact power trading, emissions trading, and power development/investment.

 Emissions Offsets/Early Reduction Credits -- EES:  Mary Schoen has been working with EES Emissions Risk Management group to provide analysis and information that will allow EES create offsets/ERCs and capture environmental value of energy service transaction with a customer in California (Pilkington).

 Environmental Disclosure/Renewable Energy Attributes:  Stacey Bolton represented Enron in PJM's trial run-through of a tracking system for environmental attributes of electricity.  Stacey has worked to promote the use of market-based systems for attribute trading environmental disclosure within the PJM system.

New York SO2 Trading Lawsuit -- EGM:  Jeff Keeler provided EGM Emissions with a recommendation NOT to join a lawsuit against New York State to attempt to overturn its new law restricting the trade of SO2 allowances to sources in certain up-wind states.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Methanol -- Jim Peterson is reviewing proposed regulatory requirements in TSCA to assist Enron Global Markets in their response to a customer request for information on methanol.

EES Information Requests - Marc Phillips provided information to EES personnel about air regulatory requirements for installing an industrial  boiler in Kohler, Wisconsin and a turbine for electricity generation at Universal Studios in California.

Workstation Ergonomic Survey - Russell Tucker conducted a workstation ergonomic evaluation for an Enron Networks employee who indicates he is turning in a worker's compensation claim for work related trauma to his right wrist allegedly contributed to by his workstation set-up. Recommendations were made to reduce the ergonomic risk factors for his workstation.

Laura Glenn
Enron Corp
Environmental, Health & Safety
Phone: (713)646-7330
Fax: (713)345-6164
email: Laura.Glenn@enron.com


Thought you might like this!
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 12:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/17/2000 03:10 PM

To: John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W
Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: cat clip............

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 03:10
PM ---------------------------

"David Kaiser" <davidk@spawglass.com> on 10/17/2000 08:21:23 AM
To: "Jared @ Enron" <jkaiser@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: cat clip............

----- Original Message -----
From: Heidi Jo Warnick <hwarnick@spawglass.com>
To: David Kaiser <Davidk@spawglass.com>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:28 PM
Subject: cat clip............

> Just  a thought to cheer you up after hauling around all those plans.
>
> Heidi Jo Warnick
> Estimating Secretary
> SpawGlass Contractors, Inc.
>

 - SCCat.MPG


Gary is the Exec Director of the Western Power Trading Forum -- one of
Enron's coalitions.  He is often quoted.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 08:35 AM -----

	Gary Ackerman <foothill@lmi.net>
	03/01/2001 08:24 AM
	Please respond to foothill

		 To: Bill Ross <billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>,
Carolyn Baker <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, CHARLES A MIESSNER
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, Corby Gardin <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, curt
hatton <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Denice Cazalet Purdum <dpurdum@apx.com>,
Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Jack Pigott <jackp@calpine.com>, Janie Mollon
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, "Klemstine, Barbara A(F56661)"
<barbara_klemstine@apses.com>, Nam Nguyen <Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, Randy
Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
Rob Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger
Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>, Sue Mara <smara@enron.com>, Jeff Crowe
<jcrowe@apx.com>, George Vaughn <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, Dan Douglass
<douglass@arterhadden.com>, Dan Douglass <douglass@arterhadden.com>, Lynn
Lednicky <LALE@dynegy.com>, "Richard H. Counihan"
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, Sandra McDonough
<Sandra.McDonough@neg.pge.com>, Dan Pigeon <Dan_Pigeon@transalta.com>, Lynn
Fisher <lfisher@apx.com>, Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, Richard Wheatley
<richard_n_wheatley@reliantenergy.com>, Paula Hall-Collins
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, Julie Gentz <julie.gentz@williams.com>,
Kelly Swan <kelly.swan@williams.com>, Joe Ronan <joer@calpine.com>, Tom
Williams <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, Ed Mosey <efmosey@bpa.gov>, Mike Hansen
<mshansen@bpa.gov>, Jan Mitchell <jan.mitchell@pacificorp.com>, Toni
Amendolia <mozart@pwrteam.com>, Mark Stutz <mark.stutz@xcelenergy.com>, Steve
Roalstad <steve.roalstad@xcelenergy.com>, John Sousa <joso@dynegy.com>, John
Fistolera <johnf@ncpa.com>, Dace Udris <dudris@smud.org>, carol clawson
<carol_clawson@fpl.com>, Al Parsons <alp@ncpa.com>, Bob Low
<Bob_Low@transalta.com>, Bob Reilley <rreilley@coral-energy.com>, Brian
Jobson <bjobson@smud.org>, Dave Nuttall <dn@ui.com>, Duane Nelsen
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, Edmond Chang <echang@wapa.gov>, Elaine Walsh
<Elaine@citizenspower.com>, Ken Lackey <Kenneth_Lackey@EdisonMission.com>,
Linda Hamilton <lhamilton@avistaenergy.com>, Mark Tallman
<mark.tallman@pacificorp.com>, "Richard H. Counihan"
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, Sheryl Lambertson <sslambertson@pplmt.com>,
Steve Ponder <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, Tom Breckon <tom@ncpa.com>, "Wolfe, Don
- PGSO-5" <dvwolfe@bpa.gov>, John Marchand <jpmarchand@aep.com>, Mark Ward
<mward@ladwp.com>, "Morrato, Joe" <Joe.Morrato@xemkt.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power producers accused of gouging

Folks,

Here is today's story.  John Howard of the OC REgister called me at 8:30
pm last night for the reaction.  As usual, I was totally off guard, but
the quote didn't fare badly.  I called my insider at the ISO, and she
(is that enough of a clue) told me that this report was discussed in
executive session, but not voted on by the Gov Bd.  The report will be
on the ISO's website today.  The real issue is DMA wants FERC to keep
open the 60-day window, and they are using a simple model (apparently so
described by the ISO in the report) to provide some evidence, however
simplistic, as to why FERC should listen.  Of course, this will do
nothing to help our image.  Get our media people ready.

gba

http://www.ocregister.com/news/california/newgouge00301cci.shtml

OCREGISTER.COM: California newsocregister.com/weather
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]			Home PageToday's NewsArchivesAdvertisingAutomotiveBusiness &
FinanceClassifiedColumnsCommunity NewsCrime, Courts &
LawOCJobFinderEntertainment  & TravelFun & GamesHealth & FitnessHelpLiberty
OnlineLiving & ShoppingPolitics & GovernmentReal EstateScience &
TechnologySearchServices & PromotionsSports & RecreationWeatherYellow Pages
		[IMAGE]	Help	Search
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

Cox!

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
california
[IMAGE]
Power producers accused of gouging

ELECTRICITY: State's grid managers plan to ask federal officials today to
order refunds of up to $562 million.

March 1, 2001

Related stories:
 Electricity notebook

 Power penalties repeal expected

By KIMBERLY KINDY, JOHN HOWARD and KATE BERRY
The Orange County Register

Power producers overcharged Californians by more than a half-billion dollars
for electricity over a two-month period, according to a study to be released
today by the managers of the state's electricity grid.

During January alone, the cost of nearly two-thirds of all electricity
purchased through the Independent System Operator was found to be
"excessive," the ISO said.

The ISO, the nonprofit agency responsible for buying and selling emergency
power for the state, said it will ask federal officials today to order the
power merchants to grant refunds.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in December found "unjust and
unreasonable" electricity pricing in California, but stopped short of
ordering penalties or refunds. However, the ISO has detailed $562 million in
specific excessive charges and is asking FERC to order refunds, disclose data
about the market and investigate further.

Although California's energy market has been deregulated, FERC has wide
latitude to set price caps if it believes rates are excessive.

"We did some estimates, based upon the availability and other considerations,
of what the electricity should have cost,'' said Anjali Sheffrin, the ISO's
director of market analysis. "We found a big discrepancy."

Power producers said they would forgo extensive comment until the release of
the study. However, Gary Ackerman of the Western Power Trading Forum, which
represents buyers and sellers of energy, said, "The ISO has the right to ask
for this review, (but) the costs were what they are. People were bidding at
the market prices, which are legitimate costs in any electrical market in the
nation."

Accusations of pricing misconduct have swirled around California's energy
crisis, but the ISO's study and its filing with FERC today will represent the
first time an agency has said it has evidence of overcharges and then taken
action to get money returned.

It was unclear late Wednesday who would receive any refunds - the state, the
utilities or individual ratepayers.

The ISO's Department of Market Analysis alleges that price gouging occurred
with as much as $247 million, or 21 percent, of the energy it bought in
December and $315 million, or 63 percent, of the energy it bought in January.

Total energy costs for those two months were more than $11 billion, compared
with $7 billion for all of 1999, Sheffrin said.

"This is a wonderful step for the ISO to take,'' said state Sen. Joe Dunn,
D-Santa Ana, who is on a Senate committee hoping to restructure the
electricity market to prevent market manipulation. "There have been many
accusations, but none of them have chosen to act."

The new ISO study looked at power production, the prevailing market
conditions and the demand for energy and found that the cost of emergency
electricity was far higher than it should have been, Sheffrin said. Further
details of the study are expected to be released today.

Sheffrin said ISO officials have asked the power producers to supply
information that would help them determine whether their estimates are
accurate, but the requests have been denied. The power suppliers filed some
of the documents to FERC, Sheffrin said.

During December and January, power producers had to provide FERC with monthly
reports if their charges to the state exceeded thresholds.

The ISO did not identify the power generators it accuses of improper pricing.
Not including the utilities themselves, the major power suppliers in
California are Reliant Energy Inc. of Houston, Duke Energy of Charlotte,
N.C., Mirant Inc. of Atlanta, Dynegy Inc. of Houston and Calpine Corp. of San
Jose.

Also on Wednesday, Bloomberg News reported that Gov. Gray Davis plans to ask
power generators to accept partial payment for power sold to the state's
cash-strapped utilities.

Email this to a friend.  	[IMAGE]	Yellow pages

		?HOME PAGE
		[IMAGE]
		?TODAY'S NEWS
		?Front Page
		?California
		?Nation
		?World
		[IMAGE]
		?ADVERTISING
		[IMAGE]
		?ARCHIVES
		[IMAGE]
		?AUTOMOTIVE
		[IMAGE]
		?BUSINESS & FINANCE
		[IMAGE]
		?OCJOBFINDER
		[IMAGE]
		?CLASSIFIEDS
		[IMAGE]
		?COLUMNS
		[IMAGE]
		?COMMUNITY NEWS
		[IMAGE]
		?CRIME, COURTS & LAW
		[IMAGE]
		?EDUCATION
		[IMAGE]
		?ENTERTAINMENT
		[IMAGE]
		?FUN & GAMES
		[IMAGE]
		?HEALTH & FITNESS
		[IMAGE]
		?LIVING & SHOPPING
		[IMAGE]
		?OPINION
		[IMAGE]
		?POLITICS &
		?GOVERNMENT
		[IMAGE]
		?REAL ESTATE
		[IMAGE]
		?SCIENCE &
		?TECHNOLOGY
		[IMAGE]
		?SERVICES &
		?PROMOTIONS
		[IMAGE]
		?SPORTS & RECREATION
		[IMAGE]
		?TRAVEL
		[IMAGE]
		?WEATHER

		The Orange County Register
		Copyright 2001 The Orange County Register
		Please send comments to ocregister@link.freedom.com


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:26 AM -----

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	01/07/2001 07:13 PM

		 To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: john klauber@llgm.com, James V. Derrick, Jr.
		 Subject: Proposed Agenda

Attached is a preliminary agenda for the LeBoeuf meetings this week.

I would like to propose that we have the LeBoeuf lawyers in the office midday
Tuesday to meet with us Tuesday afternoon and then as much as Wednesday as
necessary. I would assume we would want a core group of lawyers to attend all
or substantially all of the meetings and then we would bring in business
people as appropriate. I would also try to arrange the schedule to handle EES
only or EWG only issues  in blocks.

1.  PLEASE LET ME KNOW  ASAP IF THIS SCHEDULE IS A PROBLEM. I know getting on
everyone's calendar on short notice is a challenge.  Thanks in advance for
your attention to this matter.
2.  John, can you highlight for me any areas where you expect business
participation so we can start arranging our business people's schedules.
3.  EWG - who will take the lead on discussing the commercial agreements?
4.  Let me know if you have additional agenda topics.
5.  Jim, should we arrange some time on your calendar with the LeBoeuf
lawyers?

Please get me any suggestions, etc. Monday morning and we will work toward
developing the final agenda for the meeting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 01/07/2001 04:41
PM ---------------------------

"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM> on 01/07/2001 04:40:44 PM
To: <vsharp@enron.com>
cc: "CARL A. EKLUND" <CEKLUND@LLGM.COM>, "JAMES BOOTHE" <JBOOTHE@LLGM.COM>,
"JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>, "RALPH R MABEY" <MABEY@LLGM.COM>
Subject: Proposed Agenda

Vicki:

Attached is a draft of a proposed agenda for your consideration.  It has more
things in it than a simple agenda, but I thought it may make some sense to be
a little more inclusive in the "bullets" to make sure we cover as much as
possible, from the standpoint of understanding or at least being aware of all
of the moving parts in CA (CPUC, FERC, court litigations, etc.), while we
have everyone together at this kick off meeting.  I would view the primary
purpose of the meeting to obtain as much factual information as possible and
to provide everyone with a general sense of the types of the considerations
that would be likely to come up in the bankruptcy context.

I am simultaneously sending this to our bankruptcy folks so I may have some
additional comments or topics in the morning.  I also will send to you at
that time a brief memo prepared by our bankruptcy lawyers that goes through
some of the initial bankruptcy considerations, based upon our conversations
on Friday.

Please call me when you wish to follow up.

John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com

 - agenda.doc


Felix,

Please, resend me the term papers of your group, each as  a separate file.
Please send it to my AOL address as well as work address.

My AOL address is  vkaminski@aol.com

My home phone number is 281 367 5377.

Vince


AGA for 5/18/01 is 118

*Volumes in the Consuming Region East, for the week ending May 11, 2001, have been revised to reflect a revision of data for one company in the Consuming Region East.


Rob

Just to clear on our conversation.  I'm fine with the Sunoco transaction.


I have created a database for the Legal Dept., somewhat similar to how the
master swap agreement database works, for us to keep track of our approvals
for EOL trading, as well as any executed amendments to the EOL Password
Application, ETA, GTC, or any other EOL documents.

I have been inputting the data for the Houston based Credit counterparties,
and was wondering whether you want me to input the London based Credit
counterparties or not.  I have no idea whether you've approved them or not,
you'll have to input that data, or you could send it to me and I can input it
for you.  Also, I don't know what counterparties you've had since the initial
three big counterparty lists...But I know you are busy and it might be hard
for you to find the time to input the initial counterparty data, unless you
have an assistant do that.

Anyway, we (me, since I'm the one approving all new counterparties for every
Legal Group in Houston!) have been using it and are finding it very
helpful).  It is also helpful for when I'm out so Mark Taylor can look to see
whether I've approved a counterparty or not and what rationale I had for the
approval (usually I only put in info when I don't approve a counterparty).
Anyway, the link to the database is attached, so why don't you take a look at
it just to see what I'm doing.

We're still working on some of the sorts and inputting the data, so it's not
fully operational yet.  Anyway, give me your thoughts...Don't make any
changes, it'll screw things up...


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Luiz T Maurer
Report Name: LM 100301
Days In Mgr. Queue: 8


calendar and meeting file
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/28/2000 05:31 PM -----

	epsa@mindspring.com
	09/27/2000 02:32 PM
	Please respond to epsa

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: EPSA Fall Membership Meeting, October 24-25,2000

 - fax to members 3_1.TIF
 - fax to members 3_2.TIF
 - fax to members 3_3.TIF
 - fax to members 3_4.TIF
 - fax to members 3.doc


Great!

Have a wonderful weekend -- hope all goes well with the move.  As I
mentioned, we'll be out of town this weekend, so Emma and I will try to stop
by on Monday to see the house and the kitties!

Leslie


Eugenio,

Sorry I am not going to be here. Can you reschedule for Wednesday?

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Perez, Eugenio
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 5:01 PM
To:	Daetz, Milagros; Hernandez, Morela; Bosek, Laura; Singh, Vikram; Kanji, Ayesha; Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa; Causholli, Monika; Johnson, Jay; Chanaba, Nyree
Subject:	Yak Practice
When:	Monday, October 08, 2001 3:30 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:

Warriors:

The Yaks are calling

When Nyree secures a room for us, I will send an update.


Attached is the referenced presentation.

----- Forwarded by Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT on 11/23/2000 10:18 AM -----

	Chris Gaffney
	11/23/2000 10:11 AM

		 To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Ontario Standard Contract

Yesterday I attended the initial Ontario Standard Physical Bilateral Contract
(OSPBC) drafting committee meeting.   A summary of the meeting follows:

The main debate in the meeting was with respect to whether "physical"
transactions were possible in Ontario given the market rules.  Ontario Power
Generation Inc. (OPG) put forth the premise that all transactions involving
the pool are financial.  I led the charge that the pool was simply a
settlement mechanism yet the underlying transactions are physical in nature.
OPG supported a  form of master which essentially a much boiled down ISDA.  I
supported the Canadianized EEI form that Greg has put together.
Jack Lubec of the IMO made a powerpoint presentation on how transactions are
settled and his interpretation of the physical/financial issue.  A copy of
the presentation is attached hereto.
The group (which included TransCanada, TransAlta, AMPCO (industrials), Hydro
One (transco), the IMO, several consultants and lawyers) seemed unable to
agree with either position and decided that the market in Ontario was a
hybrid market (a position that in practice may be correct but in terms of
legal obligations is nonsensical).
The IMO advised that Revenue Canada does not take title to power, does not
take possession of power and the pool transactions are deemed not
"derivatives".  Notwithstanding this direction, some in the group seemed to
accept the OPG assertion that as a generator can choose not to generate (in
which case the pool will supply on the generator's behalf and charge the
generator) and/or a would be load can choose not to receive (in which case
the pool treats this as a resale to the pool and pays the load for energy not
consumed) and that a supplier has no ability to guarantee physical delivery
that the market is financial.  I refuted this premise but only found support
from TransAlta.
Notwithstanding the lack of consensus on the physical/financial issue the
group did agree with my position that many market participants did not have
the requisite corporate authority to do derivative or financial transactions
and those that did may not be comfortable with or even understand a financial
trading document.  All in the group supported this position.  Thus,it is
likely that the starting point, if not the Enron Canada EEI form, will be the
base EEI form.  Many supported an Ontario only document but accepted the
position if possible a multi-jurisdictional standard base agreement would be
preferred.
 The group tentatively accepted me and Dan Pastoric of Hydro One as the
co-chairs of the drafting committee.  This is subject to confirmation at the
next meeting which is scheduled for December 6th.

Elizabeth - I suggest that you and I may want to prepare some sort of memo
setting out why the market is physical and not financial.  I think that to
the extent that you (or someone in your group) can provide a commentary why
others pools (California, NEPOOL,...) are still physical markets, I may be
better equipped to convince the group.

Greg - I suggest that until we are closer to market opening in Ontario that
the form of power master that we circulate in Alberta not include the Ontario
Firm (LD) product definition as this will likely be modified through the
OSPBC process.

Regards
CJG


When: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:30 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


I have changed the dates and prices in these agreements, but those should be the only changes necessary.  Let me know if either of you see any other changes that are necessary.

Brian, let's get together this afternoon and see if we can organize our other capacity release transactions that need to be completed by December 1.  Does 3:00 your time work?


Best I can tell is January is the last month we show these deals as being active in system.

Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:49 AM
To:	Brady, Kevin
Subject:	FW: American Public Energy Agency (Nebraska)

Hey buddy.  You gave us the info for NNG, any luck with the SCAL and PGEN volumes?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:53 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Wynne, Rita; Brady, Kevin; Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: American Public Energy Agency (Nebraska)

I had most of the details yesterday morning, my fault for not responding.  And I also didn't clue into the 4/99 contract start date as well.

With Rita and Kevin's help, we have identified 4 deals for American Public Energy Agency

Deal #		Contract	End Date	Pipeline		Comment
310424		96026367	4/30/2011	NNG		Did not receive any gas for December 2001
310690		96012204	5/31/2008	NNG		Did not receive any gas for December 2001
936073		96021055	4/30/2011	PGEN		Need to see when physical flow stopped
936263		96021053	4/30/2011	SCAL		Need to see when physical flow stopped.

Rita, you ran the Deal Volume Tracking report for Dec 2001 and you found the PGEN and SCAL deals.  Would you please run a report for Nov 2001 just to make sure that we have all the current deals?

Kevin, try to determine the last day ENA supplied these deals.

Thanks.

I'm out this afternoon.  Please call me on my cell phone of you have any questions.  My number is 713-557-5095.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	American Public Energy Agency (Nebraska)

Chris,  When did we stop performing on this deal?
Ed

American Public Energy Agency (Nebraska)
4/99 kt date.
$287,000,000 pre-pay to ENA
term: 12 yrs.


Well, you're just a bit late.  Peter de Vroede already teamed me with him.
But I am honored to have been considered.  Thanks.


Kate left us a bid form for NYSEG capacity.  For CNG, I would prefer to have
the Cornwell space.  I think the South Webster goes with Tenn Z4.

Dick, other than CES, do you know what our CNG citygate positions are
starting April?


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 10:27 AM -----

	Robert Frank
	03/15/2001 09:07 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Ginger - please forward this to all of GA.  Thanks.

This is a request for help from my colleagues in GA.  I am preparing Enron's
comments to the Federal Trade Commission concerning the results of different
"regulatory approaches" by states implementing retail electric competition
programs or legislation.  The FTC has invited comments on a number of
specific issues, but their goal is to "examine various state retail
competition programs and describe those features that have resulted in
consumer benefits and those that have not yielded consumer benefits."

There are some obvious areas where we'll comment - California - but I'd
appreciate people sending me specific examples of good or bad regulatory
policies in other states.   Also, does anyone know of any good reports or
analyses already prepared on these issues?   Thanks.  -Bob


Start Date: 10/14/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101401.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


We had concluded early on in our due diligence in Brazil that financial
transactions should be conducted offshore by both the Brazilian entity and
Enron.  However, we have not conducted any due diligence on Panama to
determine if Panamanian counterparties can enter into derivative transactions
with ENA.  Are there any other offshore subsidiaries in any other
jurisdictions that could be used for this trade?

Is this due diligence something that you want to move forward on or is the
deal still in the early stages?  I would guess that the due diligence could
cost around $15,000 to $25,000 and could take from one to two weeks to
complete and there would be no guarantee that financial transactions would be
allowed.

Randy, do you know of any counsel in Panama that Enron has worked with in the
past?

Regards,
Brent

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/29/2000 03:53 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: D'Arcy Carroll/SA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

per my voice mail
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 03:52 PM -----

	D'Arcy Carroll@ENRON
	11/29/2000 04:32 PM

		 To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

Randy/Sara,

Please confirm if Enron can or cannot execute a financial swap with Aracruz
Brazil.

Alternatively, we need input on Enron's ability to execute a financial swap
for pulp with Aracruz's off-shore, Panamanian  subsidiary.

We are trying to prep for a discussion scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday
afternoon, Sao Paulo time (4 hours ahead of Houston).

Thanks your help.


Per our conversation yesterday,  I will have a job description for the Comp
Finance students sometime today.  I have also gone through the MBA resume
stack yet again.  The person who requested the phone interview is Troy
Mischke.  He works for Pratt & Whitney in Florida.  CMU has a Flexmode
Program, which is another phrase for distance learning.

 It turns out that there are a number of people that work for Pratt & Whitney
in Florida.  My guess is that they all know each other, and decided to take
the Flexmode Program together.  Here are the names

 Tony Garcia
 K. Todd Kuykendall
 Timothy Leonard
 Troy Mischke

 Only Troy requested the phone interview, although Tony Gacia did send a
cover letter.  What is the best path forward?

-Kevin Kindall


I fixed 1127631, the other deal , I do not have a confirm from you on and it is already priced at NX1 + basis.  Please let me know if you need something further on these deals.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 10:45 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Triggerable East Deals

Phillip,

Co-Steel is claiming to have triggered two deals for Nov-01 production - 1127631, 1131418.  However, these are not triggered in the system nor can I ascertain who the trader is.  Will you verify / change these deals accordingly, please.

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


Rob, we may be saying the same thing here - for the EES outsourcing
proposition (which is more than just asset management) as being defined by
Rodney et al should be managed together by Industrial Origination and ECC.
Although, I would agree that ECC should lead the sale process.  My view is
that we should not and will not recreate the structuring, customer facing and
execution requirements in Canada and Mexico required to do these deals. It is
an important strategic iniative for ENA to complete a number of these deals.
The problem is that a clear target list, joint accountabilities and schedule
between the groups has not been rolled out which was discussed at Columbia
Lakes.  All other industrial business other than P&P commodity/asset business
is the perview of ECC.

Ultimately, I have not seen any outsourcing transactions from Canada in the
deal structuring/due diligence queue.  The US group can help get these done
and can help in the pitch.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
08/03/2000 04:17 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tembec and US Originators

Dave, my thoughts regarding your note:

This is not what we agreed to in Columbia Lakes. You were very clear on the
point that ENA Industrial Marketing had enough to do South of the border. We
have staffed up our Industrial Marketing Team in Toronto and are covering all
industrials (on a full-time basis) which meet our load threshold in Ontario.
Unlike the U.S., Ontario is a relatively small market where we can and have
complete coverage. Paul and his group have done a tremendous job at
positioning Enron in this marketplace, demonstrating our core competencies,
and developing credibility. The last thing I want is some marketer up here
from the U.S. selling the box without knowing how to fill that box (ie does
not know the market fundamentals, rules or regulatory regime). This does
nothing for Enron as it confuses the customer on who they should be talking
to and destroys whatever credibility we had created to date. I have attached
for your reference, a status report on industrial coverage.

Perhaps the problem lies in how we are defining outsourcing. As you know,
there exists a continuum from portfolio management through to the energy
island concept. Enron Canada has been pitching the entire outsourcing
continuum recognizing that for many of these industrials, they will want to
walk before they run. The majority that we have talked to are interested in
portfolio management, our market expertise & information, wholesale
settlement services, and assistance with market opening readiness. I cant
imagine how a U.S. originator could talk to or offer these services to
Canadian Industrials. This is clearly in Enron Canada's wheelhouse.

With respect to the opposite side of the outsourcing continuum, it makes
total sense to have ENA utilize its resources in pursuing energy island,
asset outsourcing type structures. With these opportunities, I see ENA taking
the lead with ECC second chair. Where these opportunities are identified by
ECC, we will forward these to the appropriate ENA originator. To date, ENA
and ECC have worked well on Blue Circle, Terra, Co-Steel and Nexfor.

As for Tembec, I am confused with what you mean by not changing the deal
team. Kelli Metcalf has been up here twice talking to Tembec about a cogen in
an area that does not make any economic sense. Jan and Paul have met with
Tembec a number of times and we have had extensive discussions with Tembec
specific to Ontario, Portfolio Management, Wholesale Settlement Services,
Supply Procurement, and Asset Optimization. I realize that Bryan Burnett has
an excellent relationship with Tembec and we should leverage off of this, but
to simply "keep ECC in the loop" is fundamentally absurd and is not in
Enron's best interests.

Regards
Milnthorp

David W Delainey
08/03/2000 12:09 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tembec and US Originators

Guys, to end all arguments, I would suggest the following protocol which is
similar to what was discussed at Columbia Lakes:

 a) P&P swaps and anything to do with the network strategy/assets in the
paper sector in Canada and Mexico - Industrial Origination;
 b) Pure energy commodity positions and stand-alone energy assets (no
outsourcing) for all industrial segments in Canada and Mexico - ECC or Enron
Mexico;
 c) Energy outsourcing for all industrial segments in Canada and Mexico - I
would like Enron Canada and Enron Mexico to develop a written target list in
which ECC, Enron Mexico and the Industrial Origination groups would work
together to develop, sell and execute on the most profitable and value adding
outsourcing product for the industrial customer in Canada and Mexico - ECC
and Enron Mexico's understanding of the energy markets in Canada and Mexico
coupled with the customer facing, product development and execution skills in
Houston should provide a winning team.  I am asking for the three teams to
clearly identify the outsourcing targets, lead sales and structuring people
and the timing as far as starting discussion with each target customer
(ASAP).  I would hope that the Mexican and Canadian teams would lead the
sales process and the Houston team lead the structuring, customer facing and
execution but I will let you decide the optimum mix.  Either way, I am
expecting this target list completed and agreed to in the next two weeks for
Canada and Mexico;
 and d) for Tembec I don't think it makes sense to change the deal team at
this point; however, the US team will keep the Canadian team in the loop and
if the products become non-outsourcing related the deal should be passed to
ECC.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
12:31 PM ---------------------------

Rob Milnthorp
08/03/2000 09:46 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tembec and US Originators

Dave, attached is some of the background correspondence in anticipation of
our meeting with Brian Burnett.

Regards
Milnthorp
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT on 08/03/2000 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Angela McCulloch
07/27/2000 11:07 AM
To: Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A
Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tembec and US Originators

Rodney, Edward, Jim - We've been over this issue a number of times and I
thought we had reached resolution when we last met with Delainey.  My
understanding with respect to coverage of Canadian Industrials is as follows:

1.) ENA to take lead on industrials that have facilities in both US and
Canada and will co-ordinate coverage with ECC with respect to Canadian
Facilities.

2.) ECC to take lead on industrials that have Canadian Facilities only.

3.) With respect to Canadian Pulp & Paper Industrials, ENA will cover Pulp &
Paper Swaps and SPV structuring.  ECC will cover these industrials for all
other Enron products (i.e. power, gas, services, etc.) Again, coverage needs
to be co-ordinated.

Specific to Tembec, I share Paul's concerns on why ENA would send 2 people to
talk to Tembec re: outsourcing when Tembec is across the hall from ECC, ECC
has an established relationship, and Tembec is a Canadian Company with no US
facilities.

It is my hope that we can resolve this amongst ourselves without having to
get Dalainey involved. I would suggest a conference call next week.  In the
interim, Paul will forward a CA to Tembec in contemplation of an outsourcing
arrangement.

Regards,

Angela McCulloch for  Rob Milnthorp
Assistant to Rob Milnthorp
(403) 974-6738
---------------------- Forwarded by Angela McCulloch/CAL/ECT on 07/27/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------

Paul Devries
07/25/2000 01:30 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tembec and US Originators

Rob, We just had a very good meeting with Tembec about Energy procurement and
energy outsourcing.  While the meeting went well, I am very confused about
the Enron team making the pitch to them.  My understanding is that the
Canadian originators - particularly the Toronto team for Eastern Canadian
companies will be responsible for everything except for pulp and paper swaps
and to some extent, new SPV's.

In this instance,

1.  Tembec is a Canadian Company
2.  All their assets are in Canada
3.  Jan has been working with Tembec people in their largest facility
4.  We know the executive team at Tembec
5.  We clearly are very knowleadgable in all aspects of the Ontario energy
market which is their focus right now
6.  We understand and are pitching the overall energy outsourcing arrangement
similar to the US pitches

With this in mind, I am not sure why Kellie Metcalf and Bob Anderson flew up
here (6 hours flight time there and back, $4,000 to $5,000 in flights and
hotels) for a 4 hour meeting with Tembec.  Kelly was quite vocal in saying
that this is a client they want to serve out of Houston.  I have stated to
her that that does not make any sense in terms of efficiency and costs and
knowledge of the market where Tembec's assets are.  Obviously, much of the
technical engineering work would and should be done by the engineering team
put together in the Industrial Services Group should a deal be struck.
However, the commercial negotiations and marketing should be led by this
office!!!

I thought this had been agreed to already.  We managed to piece up the
meeting and deliver the "Enron" message, but going forward we need to have
this resolved.

Cheers, Paul D


Back By Popular Demand
Ziff Energy Group Presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
February 6 & 7
Houston - Four Seasons Hotel
Power drives storage, will a recession affect plant and storage facility development?  Will gas prices likewise continue to fall?
How can we afford to store gas when dealing with year-round price volatility?
What's the bottom line comparison between high deliverability salt and reservoir storage?
Will new technology improve storage economics?
What new storage projects are in the works?
Get answers to these questions and more at Ziff's annual storage conference. Hear industry leaders from across North America share their expertise and experiences as storage providers, power producers, utilities, pipelines, government and energy traders. Watch for more details, coming soon.
If your company would like to participate as a sponsor or in project displays, please contact Debralee Fernets at (403) 265-0600 or
e-mail us at gasconference@ziffenergy.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 4/27/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London
Outage:  ClearCase Patch
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This patch will resolve several issues involving the MVFS (ClearCase
file system.)
Backout: Remove the patch
Contact(s):  Troy Beyer  713.345.8316  713.406.1782

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sat 4/28/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 4/28/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London  thru Sat 4/28/2001 at  5:00:00 PM London
Outage:  ISDN Calling Name and Number
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: To allow for number and name to appear on telephone displays.  If
testing is successful,
permanent changes will be put into effect at a later date.  These will not be
service affecting.
Backout: Unbusy trunk group.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard       713-853-0558
  Harold Williams      713-345-8917

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:        SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


I would like to renew my SPSS.

lisa

At 05:20 PM 10/24/01 -0500, you wrote:
>I need to coordinate our order for SAS and SPSS both renewals and new
>orders.  These are on a university license and each one costs about $80 per
>license.  The charge will be passed on to your research account.
>
>Those of you with existing SAS installations, your version will keep
>working until December.  At that time it will stop working unless renewed.
>
>SPSS is coming out with a version 11 and I have asked Mudd to let me know
>when that is available.
>
>If you 1) need either of these packages now for a fresh installation or 2)
>plan on renewing the software that you currently have installed, please let
>me know.
>------------------
>David Kilgore               Jones Graduate School - Rice University
>kilgore@rice.edu          6100 S. Main - MS 531
>713-348-5378               Houston, TX 77005


Draft agenda attached.  Please mark up at will.

 <<Boston Risk Conference Agenda.doc>>

 - Boston Risk Conference Agenda.doc


This is not me.

Sorry,

Eric

Mike Wellings
03/27/2001 09:59 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Are you dealing with this?

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Wellings/LON/ECT on 27/03/2001 17:00
---------------------------

Edward Bassett@ENRON
27/03/2001 16:00
To: Mike Wellings/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Are you dealing with this?

---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Bassett/EU/Enron on 27/03/2001
16:00 ---------------------------

Michael Batey@ECT
27/03/2001 08:50
To: Edward Bassett/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: James McRae/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Small favour please.

Ed

Please could you run this for James when you have a chance.

Thanks

Mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Batey/LON/ECT on 27/03/2001 08:43
---------------------------

James McRae
26/03/2001 11:57
To: Michael Batey/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Small favour please.

Mike,

When (if :-) ) you have a minute could you do me a favour and send me an
excel dump of all the deal numbers of GTMA Physical forwards we are expecting
to settle for march production (27th to 1 April), with their projected
volumes, the contract price, and the value?  This will help me get an idea of
whether we have any missing data.

Thanks

James


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000
10:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  John P Tollefsen                           06/23/2000 11:03 AM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geoff
Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fundamentals Status Update

Hunter/Chris/Jeff

I wanted to give you a quick status update:

Space for Thursday  I've secured eb2601 all day.
Tim's needs  LCD projector and 1 PC.  He will bring all the software he needs
on CD.  (Tim said he didn't need the Web or SQL server but I'm getting them
anyway.)
Web Test Server  Online and standing by.  I will also have an Admin on call.
SQL Test Server  Being built out today with an ETA of Tuesday to be online.
Server Room on 32  Waiting on information from facilities and hope to get an
answer today.
Developer   Identified 2 possible candidates and will have a definitive
answer by end of day Monday.
Enron Net Works Shirts 3 will be delivered to you today.

I need an RC and CO # to charge equipment against.  I will send quote to you
for approval before ordering.

Regards, John


Amr --

I'd like this as well.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Levy, Alberto; Canovas, Guillermo; Gottfredson, Bryan
Subject:	RE: New Risk Management Policy- Two

Sounds very good.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 8:07 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Levy, Alberto; Canovas, Guillermo; Gottfredson, Bryan
Subject:	FW: New Risk Management Policy- Two

Rick:

I would like to suggest that "Risk Analytics" to provide you with an assessment of the "New Risk Management Policy" by the end of the coming week (August 31st).

I hope that this is fine with you.

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON <mailto:Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>  On Behalf Of Rick Buy- Enron Corp. Chief Risk Officer@ENRON <mailto:Officer@ENRON>
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 1:09 AM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON <mailto:Worldwide@ENRON>
Subject:	New Risk Management Policy

Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") are exposed to market, credit, operational and liquidity/funding risks in the normal course of its business activities.  The Enron Corp. Board of Directors approved a new Risk Management Policy (the "Policy") on August 14, 2001.  This Policy establishes a framework under which the Company's exposure to risks shall be evaluated, managed and controlled, and pursuant to which capital will be allocated and preserved.  The Policy focuses on four major types of risk: (a) market risk; (b) credit risk; (c) operational risk and (d) liquidity/funding risk.  These risks shall be managed on a portfolio basis for standard transactions via various market risk limit structures and credit approval processes, and for non-standard transactions via the Transaction Approval Process and the Guarantee Approval Process.   This Policy provides an overview of various risk measurement tools and limits to be applied to these risks, and the roles and responsibilities for the key participants of the risk management framework.

Management and employees are responsible for complying with the risk management policies and procedures addressed in this Policy, available at <http://home.enron.com/resources>.  Following an initial transiton period, various individuals within the key functions participating in the Company's risk management framework will be required to sign a Compliance Certificate, an example of which is attached to the Policy as Appendix H.

If you have any questions, please contact Cassandra Schultz, cassandra.schultz@enron.com <mailto:cassandra.schultz@enron.com>, 713-853-0429 who will put you in touch with the appropriate Risk Assessment & Control representative.  Note: this is a confidential policy, not for distribution to anyone outside of the Company without specific authorization from the Chief Risk Officer.


Professor,

As part of the assignment you ask us to evaluate the time series changes of
Home
Depot's profitability relative to previous years (last question in section
b.).
However, given that we have only 2 fiscal years of balance sheet data we can
only calculate one year of ratios (ROA, ROE, etc).  How are we to answer the
question given our dilemma?

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax


Please find attached our Weekly Report (6th October 2000) for your perusal
and information.

Regards,

Beverley


Dale,

What is your availability for a conference call with GE today?

Kay


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/29/2001>, published as of 10/29/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


The eThink Team

Do you know what's included in Enron's Code of Ethics?  Do you know what policies affect corporate conduct?  Ask Sharon Butcher, Assistant General Counsel of Corporate Legal, all your questions about our corporate policies today (June 5) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Sharon will try to answer it during her event and you can read the transcript later.

Stop what you're doing!  Go to the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage) now!  Notice anything different?


GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Carol North/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/02/2001 03:58 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Aparna
Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Click Paper aprovals

Please see attached.


Thanks for the informative phone call this morning.  Having the key issues presented in one place was very helpful.

To follow up on the meeting, the following are action items for the group.

1.	December 1 Market Readiness Update Meeting

Thane Twiggs (wholesale) and Nancy Hetrick (retail) will have at this time an understanding of the billing and settlement issues (or not) with their respective areas.  We need to ensure that EES and EPMI are able to get the necessary information to make sure that their bills and settlements are working and that we can bill our retail customers.  I will ask Linda Noske to set up this meeting.  If anyone hears anything else about the market delay, please let Jean Ryall know immediately.  As of right now, it is my impression that we all agree there is no delay scheduled???

2.	Congestion Pass thru to EES' Retail Customers

Thane Twiggs, Nancy Hetrick and Jim Steffes will get with EWS and EES counter parties to try and work through the ability of EES passing thru congestion to its customers per the contract language.  I will lead the process of consulting with EES legal.

3.	Wholesale Issues (Thane Twiggs)

a.	Define workable TCR Product
b.	End Balanced Schedule requirement
c.	Fix Capacity Auction process, including credit matters
d.	BENA/OOM/AS
e.	Settlement & Billing

4.	Retail Issues

a.	REP - ISO - Utility Interface (Nancy Hetrick)
b.	Reliant PTB (Pat Keene)
c.	TXU PTB (Pat Keene)
d.	Reliant Negative CTC (Pat Keene)
e.	TXU Negative CTC (Pat Keene)
f.	EES / EPMI License (Gloria Ogenyi + Nancy Hetrick)

5.	Information Flow

All policy statements from anyone within Government Affairs should be first vetted with Jean Ryall to ensure consistency and conformity.  Also, all people on the TO: list above should be included on all e-mail traffic.  I know this may sometimes slow down response to business people, but I think that we can all agree that no one has all the information in this very fast moving environment and unless we have a central clearinghouse we may send the wrong messages.

It is also critical that all commercial people interested in Texas need to hear about the latest.  By having Jean Ryall in the center, she will be able to ensure that no one feels "cut out".

The bi-weekly meeting should be held with Jean Ryall as Host to follow these issues in a timely manner.

6.	Wholesale Products

Thane Twiggs was going to keep the team apprised of our products and pricing info on a regular basis so we are informed about the market.

Finally, it is critical that everyone work together to get the best results possible for Enron in the Texas market.  This is our "home" base - we need to make sure that our business efforts win big.

Thanks for everything ya'll have been doing to achieve this result.

Jim


please print all
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:53
AM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll
12/28/99 08:49 AM
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Fredell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Cohagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Transaction Documents

---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 08:46
AM ---------------------------

"STEPHEN POLAKOFF" <SKPOLAKO@LLGM.COM> on 12/28/99 08:10:35 AM
To: Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, opagan@gateway.net, gnowak@sidley.com,
Mike.Coretto@uinet.com, tony.vallillo@uinet.com, cxb@wiggin.com,
LR1@wiggin.com, wcb@wiggin.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Transaction Documents

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 07:42:55 -0500
From: "John Klauberg (BARBARA MOTTER)" <BMOTTER@LLGM.COM>
To: CGaffne@enron.com,chris.gaffney@enron.com, dallegre@enron.com,
hkroll@enron.com, jader@enron.com, opagan@enron.com, opagon@gateway.net,
gnowak@sidley.com, mike.coretto@uinet.com, Tony.Vallillo@uinet.com,
cxb@wiggin.com, LR1@wiggin.com, wcb@wiggin.com
Cc: AJCHAMBE@LLGM.COM,JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM, SKPOLAKO@LLGM.COM, TMOORE@LLGM.COM
Subject: Transaction Documents
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_0C5551F0.E786CE7D"

Per Chris Gaffney's request, attached for your review are blacklines of all
of the transaction documents.  With respect to these "near final" drafts,
please note the following:  (i) the Enron Corp.  Guaranty and the form of UIL
Guaranty are being sent separately as well as part of the WPSA to highlight
changes made to those documents from the prior drafts (they will appear
completely underlined as Schedules to the WPSA); (ii) we have incorporated
much of the comments from Wiggin & Dana with respect to Section 2.2 of the
PPA Entitlements Transfer Agreement and Schedule 4 to the WPSA, but the new
text may still need some tinkering with, particularly since the retention of
the power entitlements by UI (coupled with the payment of the sale proceeds
to EPMI) required a flow through of some conforming changes throughout the
PETA; and (iii) the attached side letter relating to the RESCO Power pricing
has not been reviewed by Enron as of this e-mail.  If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact Stephen Polakoff at 212-424-8350.

 - #439609 vRED - WPSA Current.rtf
 - #315263 vRED - Enron Corp Guaranty under WPSA.wpd
 - #315380 vRED - UIL Guaranty under WPSA.wpd
 - #315918 vRED - LOOK FORWARD NUCLEAR AGREEMENT.wpd
 - #316115 vRED - LETTER AGREEMENT TO UI AND ENRON.wpd
 - #316814 v1 - Side letter re RESCO.wpd
 - #281430 vRED - PPA Entitlements Transfer Agreement.wpd


I have changed the following deals to PPT
534074
534072
534071

Thanks!!


Tom,

Attached are the graphs for energy lost due to the pitch and overspeed faults
you listed. As I mentioned before the methodology requires decent data
recovery for the 10-minute data. The data recovery was poor for several sites
in January, and for Fenner and Klondike in May.

I will be compiling a report on this request, summarizing the graph types and
some explanation of the methods used to produce them. I hope to have that
completed within the next couple of days.

If you see deficiencies or suggested modifications let me know.

Mark


David:
Have you done any memos outlining the changes to Article 9 and if so, is it
something that we can see?  Also, is it your view that  New York will adopt
the new Article 9 and if so, when?  Finally, given the fact that Enron's
primary type of collateral are LC's and cash, and we rely on perfection by
possession, do you think that there is anything about the new Article 9 that
we should be worrying about?  If this question requires more time to analyze
let's talk first.  Thanks.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
05:32 PM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
09/27/2000 04:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, kaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: presentation files

Vince:
 FYI, Grant has gone through slides 4-9 (option premium definition in GBM-BS
presentation) last time. I will copy these files to my Laptop and a floppy to
take to the Hotel tomorrow. Bring your laptop also though, just in case ...
Krishna.


When you have a minute, PECO called with an authorized trader list problem
and Liz asked me to bring it to you for handling...


Seems very likely that someone else notified DJ of this posting.  Might be
useful for our traders to understand that scrutiny in the short run is going
to be signficant.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	06/29/2001 05:03 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC proxy price in CA

I got a call from Dow Jones today about a price we had posted on EnronOnline
for day-ahead power at Mead for $105/MWh (the FERC proxy price is $91.87).  I
talked to Tim Belden and just because an offer is posted doesn't mean that
there's been a transaction.  Turns out that under our interpretation of the
FERC order, because Friday for Monday transactions exceed the 24-hour
delivery requirement, we believe they're exempt from the order.  Tim said
that at the end of today, we had done five transactions above the cap, but
they decided to lower the transaction price to the proxy price so we'd reduce
any further exposure and scrutiny.


Hi everyone,
These pics were taken on Halloween. Riley had a great time handing out candy that night. More new pics soon to come.
Pat, Susan, Riley


This is CGAS Price as of 12/31/01. Merchant Portfolio hedged this position thru the gas desk - then the gas desk hedged with third party.

							Totals	$0
			Monthly	PV	Discount	Mid	Fixed	Mid
Deal Num	Pub Code	Period	Quantity	Quantity	Factor	Price	Price	Value
ER6792.1	NX3	01-Dec-01	-75,255	0	100.00%	2.539	2.195	$0
NE6410.1	NX3	01-Dec-01	75,255	0	100.00%	2.539	2.943	$0

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Thursday, January  10, 2002 4:26 PM
To:	Ayala, Susie
Subject:	RE: CGAS Basis

Per John Lavorato, we killed all desk to desk deals on Dec. 13th.  That is why this deal was killed.  You mentioned that you had price deals that were not killed.  Can you give me deal numbers for those as well and we can take a peak and see why they were not killed.  It is our understanding that all desk to desk(book to book) should be killed because no cash actually changes hands.  Should this deal have been with an external counterparty?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ayala, Susie
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:19 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	CGAS Basis

Phillip,

Below is the information for the CGAS book that was killed on 12/13/01.  This book should have liquidated in December.  Can we get this deal back?

Thanks,

Susie
x30524

							Totals	$7,714
			Monthly	PV	Discount	Mid	Fixed	Mid
Deal Num	Pub Code	Period	Quantity	Quantity	Factor	Price	Price	Value
ER6451.1	IF-CGT/APPALAC	01-Dec-01	-75,255	-75,255	100.00%	-0.119	0.313	$32,497
ER6451.2	IF-CGT/APPALAC	01-Dec-01	75,255	75,255	100.00%	-0.119	0.210	-$24,784


Thanks for your email.

As you aleady appear to be aware, Enron Company Policy prohibits employees
from tading any products the company trades.   As you may or may not be
aware, the products the company trades has expanded beyond energy
commodities, we trade interest rates & currencies, pulp & paper, weather, and
metals.  I am sure this product base will continue to expand.  If you have
any questions about trading a particular product, please call me at x33399 (I
am a paralegal in the Legal Dept.), Mark Taylor, VP & General Counsel of
Trading, at x37459, or Ted Murphy, Control, at x33324.

	Robert Sandling@EES
	06/22/2000 09:26 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Commodity Trading Account

I have a commodity trading account, however I do not trade energy contracts.

thanks,
robert


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020111-DENWC.XLS


Debbie:

Are you alright with AIG disclosing transaction terms to a third party as a possible assignee of those trades?  If so, David and I can have the confidentiality provisions of the GTC's waived for this purpose and we can proceed.

Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barbara_Morgen@aigi.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Portz, David; Brackett, Debbie R.; Brent_Gundlah@aigi.com; Peter_Galbraith@aigi.com
Subject:	Re: financial and physical transaction assignment

Dear Sara:

I've drafted two simple forms of waiver for each of Enron North America
Corp. and Enron Power Marketing, Inc.  If these are acceptable we can fax
them to you in the morning.  Thanks for your help with this.

Regards,
Barbara Morgen

(See attached file: EnronGas.doc)

(See attached file: EnronPower.doc)

"Shackleton, Sara" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> on 11/12/2001 04:10:03 PM

To:   Barbara Morgen/AIGTC/US@AIGTC
cc:   "Portz, David" <David.Portz@enron.com>, "Brackett, Debbie R."
      <Debbie.R.Brackett@enron.com>
Subject:  financial and physical transaction assignment

Barbara:

Contact details below.  Please propose a form of waiver.  I'll talk to
credit and ask that you identify trades, assignee, etc.  Please call if
you have further questions.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

 - EnronGas.doc
 - EnronPower.doc