Whats in a name? Maybe something after all, as Dave Sterman discusses
in a feature about stocks with the word "digital" in their name. We
encourage members to download free research from Morgan Stanley on
Sprint PCS (PCS) affiliate US Unwired (UNWR), and a free Lehman Brothers
report on healthcare stocks.
Gesundheit!

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================

93% Average Gain... Strictly Limited Risk. Since October 12, this
financial advisory called 16 winners out of 16 picks,
including six triple-digit returns: SURE(119%), NVDC(147%), ARTG
(170%), ICGE(118%), TUTS(133%) and NAVI(206%). Learn to profit in
volatile times:

http://65.88.90.51/reports/TRZ/today/
==============================================================

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Gone digital
Companies with digital in their names seem to be on a roll.

By Dave Sterman

Whats in a name? Plenty, if youre talking about the word "digital."
Screening for fast-growing Net stocks, we found that three of them use
that ubiquitous moniker in their title. Recently, we chronicled the bright
prospects for Digital Insight (DGIN).

This week, were looking at the other digitals, and found a pretty
ompelling investment case for each of those as well. Both DigitalThink
(DTHK) and Digital River (DRIV) are taking advantage of the unique selling
properties associated with the Web.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4361&nd=1120

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Charge!!!
Consumers came to the rescue of retailers, and individual investors
will come to the rescue of the street.

by Charles Payne, founder, chief executive officer and principal analyst, Wall
Street Strategies

Last week saw a marked contrast to the previous week as the Northern Alliance
went from the Keystone Cops to a liberating rebel force, pushing the Taliban
back on their heels (or on their toes, as they scatter to caves and tunnels in
the southern part of Afghanistan). Wall Street mavens and the media suggested
that stocks were pushed higher by the war victories, and while I agree that
the prospect of a short war is a positive element for the market, I believe
that the week's success had some domestic ingredients as well. In fact, I think
the most telling moment of the week came when retail sales figures were released
last Wednesday, once again beating expectations.

In the previous week, many observers were surprised to see that consumer
sentiment (as monitored by the Michigan survey) came in well above estimates,
and was quickly dismissed as some type of fluke. After last week, though, I
dont think anyone can question the resolve of the American consumer.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4401&nd=1120

WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR
--------------------------

Determine Your Net Worth

Knowing your net worth gives you a picture of your financial
condition and helps you plan for the future and set investment goals. Calculate
your net worth.

http://www.americancentury.com/mi/nsltr46.html

======================== Sponsored by =========================

The Telecomm Analyst: Wall Street's daily and weekly industry outlook

Multex's The Telecomm Analyst features daily telecommunications-industry
specific research highlights, investment ideas, analyst opinions, portfolio
strategies: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTTA.asp

To be sure you receive your TTA newsletter every week, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/login.asp
==============================================================

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Crowell, Weedon, & Co. identify their favorite names in the tech
space.

The analysts list stocks they feel will "emerge from the recession
in enhanced competitive positions." In addition to their "top 10"
discussion, they identify 21 tech "outperformers" as well as 24
"underperformers." (10-page report for purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25517283&nd=1120

2. WHAT'S HOT?
RBC Capital Markets reports on early spending indications in the
sector.

The firm provides an industry-wide picture and cites two factors
driving SAN-related expenditures. They analyze increased govt. and
private sector spending, and identify four companies poised to benefit
from current trends. (2-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25517155&nd=1120

3. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
RBC Capital Markets reports its findings after a recent trip to
5 Silicon Valley network solutions providers.

The analysts recently visited Extreme Networks (EXTR), Juniper
(JNPR), Riverstone (RSTN), ONI Systems (ONIS), and Finisar (FNSR). They
relate individual company findings and offer a forward-looking industry-wide
opinion. (3-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25456311&nd=1120

4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Renowned independent research firm, The Motley Fool, provides its
monthly securities analysis.

In Novembers Select issue, TMF identifies some of the mutual fund
industrys best money managers and they provide analysis of Check Point
Software (CHKP), Medarex (MEDX), Abgenix (ABGX), and Ambassador
International (AMIE) (23-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25560342&nd=1120

---> ======================== Sponsored by =========================

Take charge of your future. And give yourself the right tools. Open an
Ameritrade account and get a 6-month Morningstar.com Premium Membership.
Benefits include analyst reports for stocks and mutual funds, portfolio
allocation tools and analysis, and the New Morningstar Rating? for stocks.
Go to http://www.ameritrade.com for more information

http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3416007;6450086;b?http://www.ameritrade.com/o.cgi?a=mgd&o=rkg&p=/html/mstar.fhtml
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
PowerOptionsPlus.coms Victor Schiller tells how to run a portfolio like
cash-generating business.

Schiller explains how you can produce extra portfolio cash by selling call
options on stock you currently own. How do call options work and how much
cash can they generate for you? Pose him questions on this subject until
Fri, Nov. 23. Ask the analyst.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=1120

Try our PowerOptionsPlus FREE Trial NOW! The Best Way To Find, Compare,
Analyze, and Make Money On Option Investments...And its Guaranteed.
Click here http://www.poweropt.com/mtx1

2. ASK THE EXPERT
American Century Investments Karen Burnett talks about choosing a
retirement plan for your business.

Choosing a retirement plan for your business or yourself is one of the most
important financial decisions you will make. Karen Burnett of American
Century Investments will take your questions until Thurs., November 29.
Click here
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=1120

3. TODAY'S LIVE EVENT
Chat LIVE TODAY at 4:00pm ET and learn about the exciting
revolution going on in the alternative energy sector

Today at 4:00pm ET, Glen Hilton, Portfolio Manager for
Montgomerys New Power Fund, will answer your questions about the
exciting revolution going on in the alternative energy sector.
Click here
http://www.multexinvestor.com/LiveEvents/Article.asp?target=%2Fliveevents%2Farticle%2Fhome&ForumID=42&DocID=4259&nd=1120

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Lehman Brothers offers an optimistic outlook on health care service stocks.

Lehman offers five reasons why health care facility stocks could be headed in an
upwards direction. Also, some commentary on recent corporate developments in
the sector. This 11-page report, which usually sells for $25, is free to members
for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=3710747&nd=1120

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley sets a $15 price target on Sprint PCS (PCS) affiliate US Unwired
(UNWR).

Discover which factors outweigh investment risks, leading to an "outperform"
rating on UNWR stock. Register for the firms free-research trial to access
research on this and other stocks.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=20474856&sid=8&nd=1120

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


nice of you to put weight and size.......

yours truely

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	Susie and Duane Wilson's baby has arrived

Little Emily Wilson was born last night at 6:24 pm,  Mom and Dad and Baby are doing fine,  they go home tomorrow morning.


Peggy Fowler should have someone from PGE calling you.  If they don't please
let me know.


I will be in print for the first time ) the October 9th issues of eWeek and
Internet Week.? I have been officially launched as a spokesperson.? It was a
little scary on the first one, but now its actually fun.? You just have to be
so aware of what you are saying, but still sound enthusiastic and lively.?
The first part doesn,t come naturally for me.

?

Cameron Sellers

Vice President, Business Development

PERFECT.COM

1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210

Palo Alto, CA 94303

cameron@perfect.com

650.798.3366 (direct dial)

650.269.3366 (cell)

650.858.1095 (fax)

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Bracken [mailto:sbracken@exchange.horngroup.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 12:44 PM
To: 'cameron@perfect.com'
Cc: 'hopper@perfect.com'; Elizabeth Sloan
Subject: Great job!

?

Cameron,

?

Great job on the calls today. I thought the InternetWeek call was especially
good in that Chuck

was so interested and interactive! I am thrilled as well that we have two
confirmed hits in eWeek

and InternetWeek for their Oct. 9th issues.

?

I sent both customer and analyst contact information along to both Jeff and
Chuck, along with the UI

screen shots that Jane sent over, so we should be all set.

?

Talk to you soon -

Sarah

?

Sarah Bracken

The Horn Group, Inc.
E-Public Relations for E-Business
415/905-4020
sbracken@horngroup.com

?

?
 - image001.jpg


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kilburn, Bobbi" <Bobbi.Kilburn@vynpc.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	'Northeast Utilities - Ray Benzinger'; Braintree Electric Light Dept.; Brian Evans - Mongeon; Burlington Electric Department; Cambridge Electric - Bob Martin; Cambridge Electric - Gail Azulay; Cambridge Electric - Jeff Alves; Central Maine Power; Central Vermont Public Service; Chicopee Electric Light Dept.; Connecticut Power & Light, Western Mass. Electric, PSNH; Baughman Jr., Don; GMP - AnnaBeth Rivest; GMP - Jim Brown; GMP - Tony Kvedar; Holyoke Municipal Gas & Electric - Brian Beauregard; Holyoke Municipal Gas & Electric - Jim Lavelle; Hudson Light & Power Co. - Anthony Monteiro; John Boguslawski; Mayhew - Middleborough Gas & Electric; Middleborough Gas & Electic Dept. - Jim Smith; Middleborough Gas & Electric Dept. - Jim Collins; MMWEC - Claire Roberson; New England Power - Don Rondeau; New England Power - William Hass; Pat Smith - NU; Paul Lopes - Taunton Municipal; Rachel Likeover - MMWEC; Rose Ann Pelletier; Taunton Municipal Light Dept. - James Irving; Taunton Municipal Light Dept. - Joe Blain; Taunton Municipal Light Dept. - Scott Whittemore; Tim Hebert - Taunton Municipal; Unitil - David Doskocil; Unitil - Francis Wells; Unitil - Robert Furino; VELCO - Tim Tremblay; VELCO- Control Room; Westfield Gas & Electric Light Dept. - Gerald Tomasko
Cc:	Boguslawski, John; Wiggett, Bruce
Subject:	Vermont Yankee Notification

 <<Rod Exchange 11_30_01 Update.doc>>

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions and/or
concerns.  Have a nice weekend.

Thanks

Bobbi J. Kilburn
Treasury & Risk Administrator
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
(802) 258-4120
(802) 258-2101
Bobbi.Kilburn@vynpc.com

 - Rod Exchange 11_30_01 Update.doc


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011713.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Munroe, Alexandra" <AMunroe@japansociety.org>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Munroe+2C+20Alexandra+22+20+3CAMunroe+40japansociety+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:59 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Woo, Hyunsoo
Subject:	Meeting in Houston

Hi Jeffrey,

We met at the opening of the Contemporary Art Museum's opening of the Yoko
Ono exhibition, and I would be delighted to see you on my forthcoming trip
to Houston to lecture next week.

Would you be free for a quick chat the afternoon of September 12? I would be
interested in learning more about Enron's support of the arts and its ties
to Japan, and would welcome the chance to describe our activities to you.

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Sincerely,
Alexandra Munroe
Director, Japan Society Gallery
Tel  212 715 1217
Fax 212 715 1262


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020321.txt


NewEnergy, Inc. has changed its name to AES NewEnergy, Inc.  This is a name
overlay in GCP.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	eserver@enron.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-eserver+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:49 PM
To:	jderric@enron.com
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - London

The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Marie Wallace
Expense Report Name: London
Report Total: $9,779.95
Amount Due Employee: $9,779.95
Amount Approved: $9,779.92
Amount Paid: $9,779.92
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Updated questions and answers for Enron employees have just been posted to http://home.enron.com/updates/qa.html
We recognize that as active employees you have special concerns and questions related to Enron's bankruptcy filing.  We regret that we are not able to answer all of your questions as quickly as you deserve, but we are working to provide accurate responses to your most important questions about employee benefits, expense payments and so on.  We appreciate your patience as we continue to try to provide timely and reliable information to you.


Janet.  Attached are the most recent numbers.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lyndon Clark <orcasouth@yahoo.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Lyndon+20Clark+20+3Corcasouth+40yahoo+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 3:12 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Life

To my lovely K2,

Take Care

Love Lyndon

__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
 - k2.jpg


Good job, Don!    We always appreciate you and all that you do!

Cindy

DON
POWELL
11/01/2000 09:26 AM

To: Ava Garcia/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Martinez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Shuler/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kim Perez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Gilchrist/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lillian Villarreal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karon
O'Gorman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Patti Dennis/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Ferguson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Carol Sommer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Sullivan/ENRON@enronxgate, Fran
Fagan/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Morgan Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynda
Laferla/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Kovalcik/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Darrell
Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben
Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Velvet
Sugarek/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron@Enron, annhoang@themail.com,
Nanci Allen <nallen@ronaldmcdonald-houston.org>
cc:

Subject: Rhonald McDonald House Photo Album

Here's the photo album from our trip to Rhonald McDonald House.  Thanks to
everyone for Enjoy!
http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4293423845&code=702824&mode=invite


When: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:00 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: We need to change location to EB 3805

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Elizabeth has a schedule crunch, so if you don't mind we need to meet in her office.  Thanks.


Kevin,
I'm back in town.  Matt and I plan to play golf this Saturday morning.  I understand you're a budding golfer.  Care to join us?

Jung
713-304-4772  mobile
713-853-7666  voicemail
713-647-6680  home


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 01:59 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	01/11/2001 01:49 PM

		 To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: URGENT- Duke/CAISO Shutoff

Stephanie - As discussed, please shut down all Duke entities immediately for
all CAISO products on EOL. I have cleared this with our CAISO trader in the
West. We are having significant confirmation problems with them.

Please do not turn them back on without speaking to me.

Should anyone from Duke call you or the Help Desk regarding this issue -
please have them call me directly on x 39477.

Thanks for your help,

Shari


http://www.intelligentx.com/newsletters/entertainment/articles/story_ent5_101801.html

Beth Cherry
___________
Sr. Creative Consultant
EnFORM Technology
713.350.1860


Jim: Attached are two Gov't. Affairs Org. charts, the first being the corporate structure( led by me) that needs to be approved by Whalley and Kean; the second chart being for  ENA/EES ( led by Steffes) that is in the process of being approved by the Offices of the Chair of both business units. The corporate budget is approximately $2.575 million( seven professionals and two support staff) while the EES/ENA budget is approximately $6.425 million( twenty one professionals and three support staff).(These budgets  include a million or so of "mitigatable" real estate leases) The corporate staff would do the following that I believe is absolutely essential( this reflects minimal staffing and " barebones" effort): 1) Management for Enron of regulatory approvals processes for PGE sale and Dynegy Acquisition and any other asset sales that may occur( 3-3.5 FTE);2) Retention of skeletal Washington Legislative presence(two employees with no outside services support) to ensure that Enron's interests on Capitol Hill and with the Administration are minimally protected and advanced. Issues include energy legislation(RTO's, etc..), CFTC-related issues; tax issues;etc....;3) .5-1.0 FTE to manage all residual issues related to non EES/ENA businesses and issues; and 4) one person to mange all state legislative and local(  including, but not limited to Texas and the City of Houston) issues relating to entire company.
         Jim Steffes will bring the EES/ENA budget to closure while I'll look for direction from you and Steve as to how to quickly bring the corporate piece to closure with Whalley. I can't emphasize enough that this is the absolute minimum staffing I could in good conscience recommend.(Overall,for North America this represents a 74% reduction in the budget 2001($33 million) to 2002($9 million) Thanks for all your help.


The document on the bottom is the one you are looking for.  I will send one
of the exhibits separately.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/06/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LV Cogen/GE Agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>
02/28/2001 09:11 AM

To: "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>
Subject: LV Cogen/GE Agreement

 Attached please find the execution copy of the LV Cogen/GE
Agreement (the second document below), which incorporates the revised
Retention Letter amounts.  I have also included a blackline (first
document below) so that you can demonstrate to GE that no other changes
have been made.  To complete the Agreement, the date of execution must
be added to the first page and Exhibit H-2 must be inserted manually.  I
believe that you already have a copy of Exhibit H-2 provided by Lee
Johnson, but I will forward a copy momentarily.
 <<Comparison of LV Cogen/GE Agreement Versions 4 to 5.DOC>>  <<LV Cogen
Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>

 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC


Lorraine, please forward the attached to Ed Meaders.


/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/
Tonights Update is brought to you by the World Championship of Fantasy
Football   http://www.wcoff.com

Here's the scoop:

Take 504 Hardcore Fantasy Football Junkies, and payout $350,000 in prizes
with $200,000 going home with the winner. Live draft in Las Vegas at the MGM
Grand Casino. (Where else?) My friends at Fantasy Sports Publications and
Draftsharks.com are putting it on and I gotta say I think it's going to be
very cool.

If you're interested in competing in the 2002 World Championship of Fantasy
Football, check out http://www.wcoff.com. Because you're a Footballguys.com
subscriber, I wanted to give you an early headsup for this exciting
opportunity.

I talked to Emil Kadlec at Fantasy Sports Publications and they've already
taken over 300 applications for the 504 slots. So don't wait too long.
Hopefully, I'll see you in Las Vegas.
Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Hi Folks,

Doing our best to get these to you early in the week as you juggle your
lineups for the stretch run.   Here's how I see the Rushing Game Matchups
this week.

PLEASE NOTE:   See the cheatsheet online www.footballguys.com for exactly
where I rank players and to determine who to start.   I always receive
emails asking me how I can have a guy ranked highly on the cheatsheet but
listed under a matchup that favors the Defense.   Just because one matchup
may be more favorable than another, that doesn't necessarily mean I'd start
the player with the best matchup.   Ahman Green may have a horrible matchup
one week but unless you're sitting on Ricky Williams or Marshall Faulk,
Green's your guy no matter who he's lining up against.  (Yes, even after
last week's performance)  The matchup info is meant to be just one more tool
in your box when it comes to deciding between players.

Stats are provided by Mike Hall's excellent FLM League Management Software.
http://www.fflm.com/ for more info.   Fantasy Points Allowed by position
numbers are from ESPN.com.   Target numbers are from our Footballguy Andy
Hicks.
Let's get to it.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Locks:  These games feature Defenses that should be overmatched against the
Offense.

Jacksonville's Stacey Mack vs Minnesota Defense

Stacey Mack played well last week rushing for 115 yards on 28 carries (4.1
ypc).   He's settling into the starting RB role pretty well.   Still very
quiet on the Fred Taylor front so you have to assume Mack's going to keep
his job.   With no playoff hopes, it probably makes sense not to rush Taylor
back.   Mack will face an ultra soft Viking defense this week ranked # 31 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 30 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New York Jet's Curtis Martin vs Indianapolis Defense

Curtis Martin ran hard last week.   He had 78 yards on 24 carries (3.2 ypc)
plus he caught a couple of passes.   This might be his week though as the
Colts are weak on defense ranking # 28 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 31 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.   If he's going to explode, this is the week.

St. Louis' Marshall Faulk vs Carolina Defense

Start Faulk.   End of story.   He's the best player in Fantasy Football.
If it matters (and it doesn't) the Panthers rank # 24 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 29 in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.   Faulk's knee was described as "puffy" after the game but he insists
he'll be fine and play.   Although some are saying Trung Canidate will see
increased time.   He's still a must start in my opinion though.

Tennessee's Eddie George / Skip Hicks vs Oakland Defense

This one hurts.   Eddie George owners have been circling on their calendars
the Oakland game with their porous rush defense.   And then Skip Hicks comes
in last week and looks like Earl Campbell rushing for 142 yards on 17
carries (8.4 ypc) and a score   (Granted, those numbers are padded with a 51
yard rush)   George is such a team player that he reportedly didn't mind
Hicks staying in the game as he had the hot hand.   I think you'll see
George back this week in his regular role but Hicks could get the call at
any time.   The Raiders have improved on defense.   Now they just rank # 30
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 24 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Prime Matchups:  These games feature Defenses that should have trouble
stopping the Offense.

Atlanta's Maurice Smith / Bob Christian vs Buffalo Defense

Maurice looked a little better (or healthier) this week but he's still
underperforming.   He rushed 11 times for 49 yards (4.5 ypc) Sunday.   Bob
Christian is clearly going to be more involved at RB.   He had 7 rushes for
17 yards (2.4 ypc) and a score.   Christian also tacked on 66 yards
receiving.   At this point, I'd say Christian deserves a look in larger
leagues.   The Bill Defense is pretty weak ranking # 27 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 28 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Chicago's Anthony Thomas vs Washington Defense

With 31 carries last week for 173 yards (5.6 ypc), I think it's safe to say
Thomas is back.   He's a perfect fit for this conservative offense.   Plus
the Bear's defense looks like it'll keep them in most games which keeps
Thomas involved.   He'll face a Redskin defense that ranks # 19 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 26 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.

Green Bay's Ahman Green vs Cleveland Defense

It's my opinion that Ahman Green owners should just forget about last week.
Green was held to just 9 yards on 9 carries by a surging Tennessee defense.
I see very little to make me think this wasn't an aberration.   This week,
he'll face a softer Brown defense that's ranked # 14 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, Cleveland is
ranked # 20 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Fantasy Football owners
traditionally have memories that last about 7 days.   I personally am not
letting last weeks performance wipe out what has been a great year.

Indianapolis' Dominic Rhodes vs New York Jets Defense

It's too early to be talking about Edgerrin James being a product of the
"system" but the truth of the matter is that no name Dominic Rhodes is
tearing it up lately.   He's had 298 rushing yards over the last 3 games.
Sunday, he rolled for 177 of them on 29 carries (6.1 ypc)   (and his longest
run was 35 yards so it's not like he padded the stats with a 80 yarder)   He
caught 3 passes to boot.   Clearly, he's playing at a high level right now
and is a must start in most leagues.   The Jets were horrible early on
against the run but have now improved to average ranking # 17 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 25
in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New England's Antowain Smith vs Miami Defense

You know Antowain Smith had fun against his old team Sunday when he rolled
up 95 yards on 20 carries (4.8 ypc)   He continues to be one of the better
stories of 2001.   Over the last 3 weeks, he ranks as the # 8 RB in Fantasy
points per game.   Smith should have had a TD but went down at the 2.   This
week, he'll face a Dolphin Defense that's been soft lately.   They rank # 26
in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 11 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

New Orleans' Ricky Williams / Deuce McAllister vs Tampa Bay Defense

Williams had a sub par game Monday night and it does seem like Coach Jim
Haslett has been looking the other way the last few games.   He only had 14
carries Monday.   He did gain 57 yards (4.1 ypc) so he did well when he was
in there.   Some of that can be attributed to the Rams and their offense
taking Williams out.   Although you can't ignore Deuce McAllister.
McAllister had 5 catches for 44 yards (but just one carry)   The Bucs are
nothing special lately ranking # 21 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over
the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 15 in Fantasy Points Allowed
to RBs.   Keep an eye on Tampa's Warren Sapp who missed a good bit of time
last week with a shoulder injury.   It'd be a nice boost if he's less than
100%.

New York Giants' Tiki Barber / Ron Dayne vs Seattle Defense

Barber continues to steal the show from Ron Dayne.   Barber rushed 16 times
for 85 yards (5.3 ypc)   Dayne only had 4 carries for 9 yards.   Barber was
also the Giant's leading receiver with 5 receptions.   I don't see that
changing a lot.   Seattle is ranked # 29 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game
over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 13 in Fantasy Points
Allowed to RBs.

San Francisco's Garrison Hearst vs Philadelphia Defense

Garrison Hearst continues to be one of the best stories in the league.   He
ran for 103 yards on 26 carries Sunday (4.0 ypc)   You have to be a little
worried about him though as Kevan Barlow got both rushing TDs.   And both
Terry Jackson and Fred Beasley saw red zone carries.   Hearst will be a guy
who runs up and down the field but it looks like coach Steve Mariucci has
more faith in the other guys for the goalline.   The Eagles rank # 23 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year,
they rank # 10 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Even Matchups:  These games feature no real advantage either way

Arizona's Michael Pittman / Thomas Jones vs Dallas Defense

Things are looking pretty bad for Michael Pittman owners.   As we commented
earlier, the carries allotted to Jones have been creeping up.   Last week,
it looked more like a full blown time share with Pittman running 14 times
for 37 yards (2.6 ypc) and Jones totaling 24 yards on 12 carries (2.0 ypc)
Clearly, neither are any good but that's bad news for Pittman owners.   Of
even more concern is the fact that Jones is looking like the short yardage /
red zone guy.   The Cowboys rank # 25 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over
the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 14 in Fantasy Points Allowed
to RBs.   It's tough right now to put much faith in either guy though, even
with the favorable matchup.

Buffalo's Shawn Bryson vs Atlanta Defense

Travis Henry's tough rookie year continued Sunday as he injured his knee.
Shawn Bryson will likely get the bulk of the work this week.   Bryson didn't
do much Sunday running 14 times for 38 yards (2.7 ypc)   He did catch 3
passes.   He'll likely be better with a week of practice with the first
unit.   The Falcons haven't been anything special against the run lately
ranking # 22 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks and #
21 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs for the year.

Dallas' Emmitt Smith vs Arizona Defense

Emmitt Smith looked like the "old" Emmitt Smith.  "Old" as in 2001 version
which means not very good.   He struggled to get 39 yards on 12 carries (3.2
ypc) and generally wasn't a factor.   He's an up and down player so realize
your taking a chance with him.   The Cardinals aren't much on defense
ranking # 20 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year, they rank # 23 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Miami's Lamar Smith vs New England Defense

Lamar Smith is a grinder type back that needs lots of carries to be
effective.   He only rushed 9 times Sunday for 22 yards (2.4 ypc)   That
won't get it done.   Travis Minor is a threat but it looks to me like the
Dolphins will stay with Smith for now.   New England ranks # 13 in Rushing
Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank #
16 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Pittsburgh's Chris Fuamatu-Ma'afala / Jerome Bettis / Amos Zereoue vs
Detroit Defense

Amos Zereoue had a pretty good game against Baltimore with 73 yards on 16
carries (4.6 ypc)   But he hurt his shoulder and is now questionable for
this week's game.   Fuamatu-Ma'afala ran hard but had little room to move
gaining 15 yards on 9 carries (1.7 ypc)   And finally, Jerome Bettis is in
the mix although the early word has him as doubtful again for this week's
game.   Obviously, they're being very careful to preserve him for the
playoffs.   We'll try to stay on this story this week for you.   The Lions
are surprisingly tough against the run lately ranking # 11 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 22 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

San Diego's LaDainian Tomlinson vs Kansas City Defense

Tomlinson struggled a bit last week with just 46 yards on 17 carries (2.7
ypc)   He did add 23 yards on 6 catches.   He'll face an improved KC defense
this week ranked # 8 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 27 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Seattle's Shaun Alexander vs New York Giants Defense

It's been an up and down last couple of weeks for Alexander owners but with
Ricky Watters broken ankle, Alexander is back in the saddle as the # 1 Guy.
Look for him to pick up where he left off.   Last week, he rushed for 27
yards on 7 carries (3.9 ypc) plus a TD.   The Giants have been pretty
average lately in stopping the run ranking # 15 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 2 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.

Washington's Stephen Davis vs Chicago Defense

Stephen Davis played well last week with 111 yards on 24 carries (4.6 ypc)
He was one of the few bright spots for Washington.   This week, he faces a
tough but beatable Bear defense that ranks # 16 in Rushing Yards Allowed per
Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 9 in Fantasy
Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downside Matchups:  These games feature a Defense that could pose trouble
for the Offense.

Baltimore's Moe Williams / Terry Allen vs Cincinnati Defense

You know it's not good when Obafemi Ayanbadejo leads the team in rushing
yards and Elvis Grbac leads the team in rushing TDs.   But that's what
happened Sunday against the Steelers.  ( I wonder if Ray Lewis thinks the
Steelers have a "real defense" yet?)   Moe Williams logged 15 yards on 4
carries (3.8 ypc) and Terry Allen made a less than smashing debut with 3
yards on 3 carries (you do the math)   Tough to say how it'll be split this
week but you'd have to think Allen will see more time.   The Bengals aren't
as good as Pittsburgh, but they're very good ranking # 4 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 4 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Tough matchup especially since it's not yet
clear how the carries will be split.

Cleveland's James Jackson / Jamel White vs Green Bay Defense

Watch this one closely this week as Jackson tweaked his troublesome ankle
again.   He could be ok, but it's not clear early this week.   If he can't
go, I'd expect you'll see Jamel White over Ben Gay as Gay has made more than
his share of mistakes.   Whoever runs will be facing the suddenly vulnerable
Packers who rank # 18 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 8 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Kansas City's Priest Holmes / Tony Richardson vs San Diego Defense

We had Holmes ranked # 5 last week.  I'm guessing you'll see more sites
follow our lead and raise him up the charts as well.   He had a monster game
(again) with 121 yards on 29 carries (4.2 ypc) plus the score.   He's a must
start against pretty much any defense.   This week, he'll face a San Diego
team ranked # 6 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year, they rank # 7 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.   Still
though, I wouldn't let that stop me.   Do keep an eye on his health this
week as he's nursing a sore groin that might limit him.

Minnesota's Michael Bennett vs Jacksonville Defense

Outside of Indianapolis, I don't know that there's been a more disappointing
than Minnesota.   Or one tougher to predict each week.   You get fired up on
Michael Bennett and then he cools off.   Last week, he was back to his early
season workload with only 10 carries.   He did gain 40 yards (4.0 ypc) so
when he ran, he did fine.   With him, it's a numbers game.   Give him enough
carries and eventually he'll break one.   But 10 opportunities won't do it.
And he'll face a very tough Jacksonville defense that's been hot lately.
They rank # 2 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.
For the year, they rank # 12 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Oakland's Charlie Garner vs Tennessee Defense

Charlie Garner had his usual productive day with 68 yards rushing on 19
carries (3.6 ypc) plus another 45 yards receiving.   The big news was Tyrone
Wheatley not getting a carry.   Looks like Zack Crockett is back in at the
goalline.   Although that can change at any moment.   The Titans shut down
Ahman Green last week so that's a worry.   They rank # 9 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 17 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Philadelphia's Duce Staley vs San Francisco Defense

Staley continues to salvage his rushing numbers with his contributions in
the passing game.   He rushed 15 times for 36 yards Sunday (2.4 ypc)   He
also had 2 fumbles.   But on the bright side, he caught 8 passes for 73
yards.   They'll find the going a little tougher this week against San
Francisco ranked # 5 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last four
weeks.   For the year, they rank # 19 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

Tampa Bay's Warrick Dunn / Mike Alstott vs New Orleans Defense

You'll go crazy trying to figure out which one of these guys will do
anything week to week.   Dunn only had 10 carries for 27 yards (2.7 ypc) and
Alstott only managed 7 rushes for 23 yards (3.3 ypc)   Dunn was heavily
involved in the Tampa Dink and Dunk passing game but that's tough to count
on.   They'll face a New Orleans defense that's likely smarting from the
Rams defeat.   They rank # 7 in Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last
4 weeks.   For the year, they rank # 18 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Defensive Slam Dunks:  These games feature a very tough Defense posing major
problems for the Offense.

Carolina's Richard Huntley vs St. Louis Defense

Huntley should be rested after the bye week.   Unfortunately, rest won't
make him any more talented.   The Rams rank # 10 in Rushing Yards Allowed
per Game over the last 4 weeks and # 5 in Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs so
this isn't looking good.

Cincinnati's Corey Dillon vs Baltimore Defense

It's strength against strength this week with Dillon facing the Ravens.   If
you can imagine it, the Bengals will be hurting without Akili Smith at QB...
That means Dillon is the whole offense and you can bet the Ravens will be
geared up for it.   On a forward looking note, it doesn't get any easier for
Dillon as he has Tennessee and Pittsburgh on the horizon.   If your trade
deadline hasn't passed, I'd consider dealing him.   The Ravens rank # 12 in
Rushing Yards Allowed per Game over the last 4 weeks but I think they're
better than that.   They rank # 3 for the year in Fantasy Points Allowed to
RBs.

Detroit's James Stewart vs Pittsburgh Defense

James Stewart's hip injury may not be as bad as feared.   He had a solid
game in their first victory last week rushing for 91 yards on 20 carries
(4.6 ypc)   The awful news this week is that he's playing Pittsburgh.   The
Steelers are dominating offenses right now ranking # 1 in Rushing Yards
Allowed per Game over the last four weeks.   For the year, they rank # 1 in
Fantasy Points Allowed to RBs.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

That'll do it for the Rushing Matchups.   Passing Matchups to follow.

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001
11:05 AM ---------------------------

Tori Kuykendall
02/13/2001 11:03 AM
To: Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: December pasadena


Here they are, just in case....

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:12 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ NP 15/SP 15 Electricity Price Index

 <<NP 15 pages.xls>>  <<SP 15 pages.xls>>

 - NP 15 pages.xls
 - SP 15 pages.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:25:53 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ COB Electricity Price Index

 - Cob.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:00 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ Mid-Columbia Electricity Price Index

 - MidC.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:25:56 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ Palo Verde Electricity Price Index

 - Palo.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/28/2001 08:10 AM
---------------------------

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 02/27/2001 01:26:05 PM
To:
cc: "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>

Subject: DJ MeadMarketplace

 - MeadMktplace (2).xls


Rick -

Attached is the headcount information you requested for the meeting on
Wednesday (4/11/01) for your review and information.  In addition, I have
attached excel spreadsheets for each cost center that indicate headcount
information at the end of 2000, current (2001), anticipated (2002 and 2003).

Please advise if any additional information is needed for Wednesday's meeting.

Eric


Jeff --

Here are my thoughts.  Add / delete any

The state has properly identified (finally) the fundamental problem in
California - the shortage of supply in a market with growing demand.
Recognizing the core problem is at least half of the battle.
But rather than remove the current roadblocks to increased generation and
transmission investment, California appears to be choosing to own and operate
generation and transmission.
The best solution is to have the state allow private companies to site new
generation.
Given government's other large scale participation into public power - TVA,
BPA, NYPA - it is highly unlikely that trying to set up a state agency to do
something that private capital is willing and able to do is rational or in
the public interest.
Issuing debt costs consumers money and takes away capital from other
important issues - new roads and new schools.
We would be willing to work with the Legislature to help craft a bill that
gets more supply in California quickly, efficiently, and in an
environmentally sound manner, but this draft only creates more bureaucracy.


Stinson,

Should we get him as well?
It seems he has the right skills.
We might have maxed out on the
number of summer interns through
the A/A program. We would have to
hire him directly.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000
08:20 AM ---------------------------

"Shikhar Ranjan" <shikhar@stanford.edu> on 02/28/2000 02:31:39 PM
To: Ravi_Thuraisingham@enron.net
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Fw: Stanford OR - Summer Intern

Hi Ravi:

I had sent an email about a week back with my resume for the summer
internship. I think the address I sent it to was not correct, so I am
resending it. I will also tell the others in the group to send there resumes
to you. Thanks.

Regards,
Shikhar
------------------------
Shikhar Ranjan
PhD Student
Management Science & Engineering
Stanford University CA
(650) 497 5762

----- Original Message -----
From: Shikhar Ranjan <shikhar@stanford.edu>
To: <Ravi.Thuraisingham.Enron_Communications@enron.com>
Cc: <Ravi.Thuraisingham@enron.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 5:24 PM
Subject: Stanford OR - Summer Interns

> Hi Ravi:
>
> Please find attached my resume for the summer internship program. I
> apologize for the delay. We actually lost your contact info. Please let me
> know if you will need any additional information and/or a cover letter
> besides the resume and I can send it right away.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
> Shikhar
> ------------------------
> Shikhar Ranjan
> PhD Student
> Management Science & Engineering
> Stanford University CA
> (650) 497 5762
>

 - Resume00-ENE.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/29/2001 01:04
PM ---------------------------
From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/28/2001 12:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: RCR Changes and Suggestions

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rorschach, Reagan
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:28 PM
To: 'kay.mann@worldnet.att.net'
Subject: RCR Changes and Suggestions


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
08:26 AM ---------------------------

Al Arfsten <arfsten@bflassociates.com> on 01/27/2001 04:31:25 PM
To: Mark.Lay@enron.com
cc: vkamins@enron.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: New Commodity Marketplace Opportunity]

Mark Lay:  Again, thank you for listening to my concept.  In my search for
co-foounder/collaborators and
angel investors, disclosing the concept (for lack of a better title now, I
call the system "LifeTrak")
and formulating a simple, clear picture is not easy.  The attached schematic
depicts an overview of the
effort.  Part of the diagram hopes to separate the special interests as
participants and member
organizations so as to be helpful in the public sector with social issues.
The groups fall into two
natural sectors;  (1) supply generators; and (2) user/service organizations.
In the middle is the system
and its management that interconnects those benefiting groups and the
donor/recipient LifeTrak
cardholders.  I can embellish more on these later.  The diagram gives us a
place to begin discuss and
talking points in order to try to simplify how the concept could be developed
and supported and where the
revenue model which creates dramatic efficiencies generates management and
license fee.  I hope we can
get together soon.  Although Vince Kaminski cannot directly contribute due to
his other commitments, I
have copied him to keep him advised (hoping that he might be able to do more
at a later date.).  Best
regards, Al Arfsten

Mark.Lay@enron.com wrote:

> I did understand that you were still at the concept stage.  It is a very
> interesting proposal and I would like to think about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Al Arfsten <arfsten@bflassociates.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Al+20Arfsten+20+3Carfsten+40bflassociates+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
ENRON.com]
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, January 25, 2001 10:45 AM
>    To:     Lay, Mark
>    Subject:  [Fwd: New Commodity Marketplace Opportunity]
>
>    Mark:  Per our brief conversation this morning, the attached email was
>    sent to you yesterday.  I hope that you might understand that I am
>    conceptually looking for "founders" and at the "pre" business plan
>    stage.  There is an enormous problem existing with a very attractive
>    economic reward and willing participants needing this solution.  I need
>    help.  Al Arfsten 713 965 2158
>
>    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>    X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
>    Message-ID: <3A6F4DF1.B96146EE@bflassociates.com>
>    Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:49:37 -0600
>    From: Al Arfsten <arfsten@bflassociates.com>
>    Organization: BFL Associates, Ltd.
>    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD47  (Win98; I)
>    X-Accept-Language: en
>    MIME-Version: 1.0
>    To: mark.lay@enron.com
>    Subject: New Commodity Marketplace Opportunity
>    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>    Mark Lay:  I shared confidentially with Vince Kaminski my developing
>    concept of a highly inefficient not-for-profit enterprise with
>    dramatically increasing costs.  I believe that a for-profit economic
>    model is possible that should reverse these skyrocketing costs and
>    ultimately lower the commodity thereby having a national, if not, global
>    impact of health care costs.   Vince seems to also believe in the
>    concepts potential.  The CEO of one of the biggest U.S. blood banks has
>    already asked to become involved.   I would like involve more people
>    with vision, means and desire to help make this a reality.  I would look
>    forward to meeting with you to talk further.  Al Arfsten 713 965 2158

 - LifeTrak Vision Chart 012601.doc


If we sell all of the following mutual funds in HM-E0030:
Munder Money Market
Munder Net Net
MFS Emerging Growth
Pimco Growth
Putman Voyager

That should bring available cash for equities to: $190,000

We can open a new managed account with a Large Cap
Value manager (NWQ) and fund it with $100,000

We can add $30,000 to HM-E0069 bringing the account
balance to appx $103,000 and replace the manager with
Newbridge (a different large cap growth)

We can add the remaining $60,000 to HM-E0070 bringing
the account balance to appx $154,000 and replace the
manager with Fayez (a different core manager)

After all the dust settles the accounts should look like:

Fayez (Core S&P) $154,000    43%
Newbridge (Large Cap Growth) $103,000   29%
NWQ (Large Cap Value) $100,000    28%

We will drop the documents of at the front desk
on Wednesday.

Regards,

David L. Shine
Vice President-Investments
UBS PaineWebber
1111 Bagby, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 654-0396  Direct
(800) 553-3119  Toll Free
(713) 654-4723  Fax

 <<...OLE_Obj...>>

******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.

Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.


Hi Kirk,

I just wanted to check on you and see how the approval process was going.  Have you heard from the ACC Commissioners yet?  Please let me know if we can do anything for you.

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources) [mailto:KetcheKL@bp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Big Sandy Delivery Point Construction and Operating
Agreement - Revised

Hi Kim.
Just wanted to let you know that the Big Sandy project is awaiting a vote
yes/no from the ACC Commissioners on the 26th of this month.
At this point, I think it is likely that the project will not be approved,
and may opt to resubmit.
Counsel for Caithness in the appeal process suggested a negative bias in the
ACC Power Plant Siting Committee, and that was not well received by the
Commissioners....major blunder.
I will keep you updated as this continues to develop.
If a yes vote, then we will proceed immediately with interconnect agreement,
etc.
Best regards,
Kirk


Mark will be out of the office on vacation June 11-15, 2001.   In his absence please contact Lance Schuler (extension 35419) or Julia Murray (extension 34794).

Mark can be reached at (850) 337-5264.

Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


PROJECT ANNOUNCEMENT: THE CAEM GRID ENHANCEMENT FORUM

PROMPT REPLY REQUESTED.

A slew of new power control, management, transmission and storage
technologies are becoming available in the power marketplace to reduce
congestion, enhance performance and improve reliability.  These
technologies carry great promise for addressing some of the challenges
currently faced by regulators and market participants alike.  But there
appear to be significant institutional, regulatory and pricing barriers
to their widespread use.  In addition, the new technologies are likely
to present challenges of their own.

Accordingly, the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
(CAEM?www.caem.org) is hosting a consensus-building forum designed to
(a) achieve a common understanding of the grid-enhancing potential of
the new technologies; (b) use an intensive role-reversal seminar to
identify and highlight the institutional, regulatory and market design
barriers to the successful deployment of the various new tools; and (c)
develop technology-neutral recommendations addressing these barriers.

The project will begin in early 2002 with final policy recommendations
to be published by Spring of 2002.  The project is expected to have a
significant impact on decisions made by regulators, financial analysts,
utility executives, the media and potential customers.

For a copy of the proposal, please e-mail Philip Marston, the Project
Director, at pmarston@marstonlaw.com.  This forum is time-sensitive and
the number of participants is limited.


Who are these guys and should someone from our group meet with them?
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 02:36 PM
---------------------------

David P Dupre
09/12/2000 11:12 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston MG Visit

Hi,
With the visit approaching by Al Pennisi and Craig Young this Wed.Sep 13
through Fri. Sep.15, please let me know
if you have an interest in visiting with them.  I will be helping to
facilitate their meetings.

If you do have an interest, please let me know which times are most
convenient, in order of preference.

Have a pleasant week,

Thanks
David 3-3528
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 11:10
AM ---------------------------

Craig Young
09/08/2000 01:06 PM
To: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D
Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marco Provenzano/Chemetall
S.p.A./Chemetall@CHEMETALL, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P
Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Kelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara
Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Lorna Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Pullicino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Speck/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/NY/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT,
Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT,
Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, TJ Pimpinelli/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
cc: Craig Young/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Houston Visit

Alfred Pennisi and myself will arrive Houston Wed 9/13 and leave Friday. Al
Pennisi is in charge of operations for NY futures/swaps and I head up the
group. Our objective is to meet with each of you or anyone else that can help
us provide/expand internal and external client services for regulated and
nonregulated futures and forwards. We are a U.S. regulated commission house
purchased by Enron Europe through MG London/Enron Trading Services Inc.

Clearing futures exchanges
Combined margin and cash management efficiencies
Broker service across all commodities/financial
Our current client base--- commercial and funds
Meeting desk heads who trade futures
Integrating Enron Net Works/Enron On Line into services and clients
Enron documentation/access for web based non metal
Enron documentation for swaps/OTC non metal
Credit issues --- outside of Metals
Regulation and Govt relations
Fund or Alternative Investment opportunities ---  CTA/CPO
Cross origination opportunities with our clients

Regards
Craig Young
800-932-2343
212-715-2342
917-860-1786
520 Madison Ave
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022


Please email a two way NDA to Aspen Technologies

Wayne Bartel
wayne.bartel.petrovantage.com
Aspen Technologies
10 Canal Park
Cambridge, Mass 02141
617 949-1116 fax
617 949-1412


Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with
Glynn:

Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing
included a list of top twenty creditors.  Our negative CTC claim was
apparently not taken into account in compiling that list.  The list is
nonbinding, however.  PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on
April 20.  Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured
claims).  You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and
state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as
uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the
claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the
court determines the validity of the claim).
Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee:  PG&E may have the opportunity
to influence representation on the creditors' committees.  There are several
reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2)
we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the
real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as
significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers
... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on
the creditors committee anyway).


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		3
Task Due On:
Task Start Date:


Hey John,

Clearly having any job is better than  none, but I am curious how y'all are viewing the UBS acquisition.  If a  clear break from Enron can be achieved quickly, that would be a beautiful  thing.  However, it is hard to imagine that will be possible.   Thoughts?  I have been talking with Fairley, but I am curious if there was  anything that left a bad taste in your mouth from your meetings with him.   My resume has already been sent to most of the energy companies, but I have  received zip responses.  The Enron Effect has really confused the  market.  I have not lost hope, but if I do not start seeing some movement  by the end of February I will begin to worry.  I still hope to stay in  energy and to stay in Houston, but if February proves to be a dead month, I will  start considering relocating.  What a friggin' mess.  Where are y'all  going to be located?

Hopefully, you have been able to put  some of this behind you and enjoy the forced "slow time".  I played golf  last week, but I had to use someone's clubs and it completely screwed me (I  wouldn't even consider what I was doing "golf").  Oh well, back to the  range.

Keep in touch,
Mathew
----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Griffith@enron.com >
To: <mgimble@houston.rr.com >
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:30  AM
Subject: RE: Just  Checking
> I have received an offer from UBS and I have  basically accepted.  I am not
> required to sign a contract.  I  am an employee at will.  How are you doing?
> Any leads?
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From:   "Mathew M Gimble" <mgimble@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Thursday,  January 24, 2002 1:11 PM
>    To:      Griffith, John
>    Subject:  Just Checking
>
>
>    Griff,
>
>    Had lunch  with Fairley the other day  and was wondering how things are
>     going with you.  Are you going with  UBS?  What's  going on?
>
>    Mathew
>
>
>
>  **********************************************************************
>  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may  contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended  recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly  prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for  the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com  and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail  (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance)  and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron  Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,  and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or  otherwise. Thank you.
>  **********************************************************************
>


Marie:

Please place Michael Schuh by RWE and Raoul Saxena by J Aron instead of me as I am only acting as a Houston resource to Michael and Raoul as necessary. They are handling the negotiations. You should also add them to the distribution list. Thanks.

Alan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Athena Alexander (E-mail); Clark, Morris; Cook, Mary; David Mitchell (E-mail); Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gaffney, Chris; Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Jones, Tana; Keohane, Peter; Koehler, Anne C.; Lech Kalembka (E-mail); Leite, Francisco Pinto; Marissa Morelle (E-mail); McCullough, Travis; Mellencamp, Lisa; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Portz, David; Rick Antonoff (E-mail); Rohauer, Tanya; Sager, Elizabeth; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Simons, Paul; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John; Von Bock Und Polach, Marcus; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Master Netting Agreement Assignments

Updated list of master netting agreement assignments.

	 << File: MASTER NETTING AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENTS.doc >>


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Internet Daily for Thursday, May 17, 2001
by Frank Barnako CBS MarketWatch.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Napster readies member service test

Napster is looking for a few good downloaders. "Be the first to
preview the new membership service," says an announcement posted
Thursday on its Web site. A form for submitting an e-mail address
is provided, but there are no details about what the service will
offer and how it may work. Napster's partners previously said a
subscription music service, to be priced between $5.95 and $9.95
a month, would be launched in July. Plans for setting up a
subscription-based business model emerged after a federal judge
ordered Napster to remove music protected by copyrights from its
innovative file-sharing service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
MusicNet goes public today

The Internet subscription music  service that RealNetworks and
several major music labels are backing gets its first public
demonstration Thursday at a congressional hearing on Capitol
Hill. Rob Glaser, chairman of the Seattle-based software company,
will show off MusicNet to members of a House Judiciary
subcommittee that oversees intellectual property. "The hearing is
intended to educate members about the availability of music
online and the obstacles to offering digital music for sale on
the Internet," said Rep. Howard Coble, R-N.C., the panel's
chairman, in a letter to lawmakers. RealNetworks is providing the
technology for MusicNet, a venture in which Bertelsmann AG, AOL
Time Warner, and EMI Group have interests. On the Web, the
MusicNet site promises a taste of things to come in the form of a
"free trial offer in our partners' subscription service" that
will be made available soon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vegas seen ready to roll online dice

There has apparently been a change of heart by owners of several
major casinos in Las Vegas. Originally opposed to legalized
Internet gambling, executives of Harrah's Entertainment and MGM
Mirage are now prepared to oppose reintroduction of federal
legislation that would ban Web gaming, according to a New York
Times report. Some politicians and industry analysts say the
casinos believe there is no way Web gambling can be prohibited,
and thus believe they would be better served by supporting its
regulation and entering the business themselves, the report said.
Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., is sponsoring the anti-Web gaming
legislation. The window of opportunity to pass the bill "may have
closed," he told the newspaper.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

For late-breaking market news you can't afford to miss, go to
http://CBS.MarketWatch.com/

#################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format,
using helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that
connect you directly to information you want. Use the link
below to log in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed
by Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 CBS MarketWatch. All rights reserved.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, printed or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


Steve:

As you requested, the following is a detailed update on pipeline safety
legislation currently moving through Congress:

Pipeline safety reauthorization legislation

Authorization for pipeline safety programs, as administered by the U.S. Dept.
of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), is currently set to
expire at the end of FY 2000.    At the beginning of the 106th Congress,
industry was focused on securing a simple, two year re-authorization bill
that basically extends current pipeline safety programs with some modest
increases in funding levels.  In fact, the House Commerce Committee (who
shares jurisdiction over pipeline safety with the Transportation &
Infrastructure Committee) acted early in 1999 to pass a simple, two year
reauthorization bill (H.R. 1378).

Unfortunately, the issue became more complex from that point.   A serious
liquid pipeline accident in Bellingham, Washington that occurred last summer,
killing several children, dramatically changed the debate over pipeline
safety.   Members of the House and Senate from Washington state (backed by
the governor and numerous state and local officials) moved swiftly to
introduce legislation that they feel is designed to address some of the
shortcomings in federal pipeline regulation that they believe may have
allowed the Bellingham incident to occur.

In the Senate, Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) has introduced S. 2004, which is
designed to expand State authority over interstate pipelines in several new
areas, such as inspection and testing, emergency response plans, leak
detection, and operator training and qualification.   The bill also would
authorize a large increase in OPS funding through pipeline user fees, to
increase the amount of grants to the States, allow for hiring of additional
inspectors, and increase R&D for inspection and leak detection technologies.
The current OPS budget is around $36 million (with $30 million from user
fees) -- the Murray bill would authorize $50 million in FY2001, which would
require a sizeable increase in user fees.  Senator Slade Gorton (R-WA) has
recently decided to co-sposnor the Murray bill, and will be actively involved
in trying to gain Republican support for the bill.   On the House side, Rep.
Jack Metcalf (R-WA) has introduced a similar bill, H.R. 3558, which a number
of the Washington representatives have co-sponsored.

Interstate natural gas pipelines have been placed in a very difficult
situation.    The Bellingham incident was a liquid pipeline accident, and
liquids pipelines generally have less stringent regulatory requirements than
natural gas pipelines.   The Washington delegation has highlighted the fact
that 280 deaths and 1500 injuries have occurred over the past 14 years
related to natural gas pipeline incidents, but they fail to distinguish the
fact that almost all of those incidents were on LDC systems (which
ironically, are entirely State regulated).  Only 39 fatalities in that period
were natural-gas related, and the majority of those accidents were caused by
third party damage.  In short, the INGAA crowd is being dragged down by the
poor records of the LDCs and the liquid pipelines.

The calls for more state regulation of interstate pipeline are largely
misguided, based on the fact that the interstate pipelines under federal
regulation have an exemplary safety record.   In addition, OPS is already
working on a "Pipeline Integrity" Rulemaking that would implement a number of
additional measures to prevent accidents on federally-regulated pipelines.

As you mentioned, INGAA has not been doing the best job representing us on
these issues.  They have been working in a group effort with API, AGA, and
the Association of Oil Pipelines (AOPL) to try and deflect the negative
claims of the Murray and Metcalf legislation, but have not been forceful
enough in distinguishing interstate natural gas pipelines' positive record
from the liquids and LDCs.  Thus, they have given the impression that INGAA
companies might be willing to submit to additional regulation that liquids
and LDC are under political pressure to submit to due to Bellingham.  We have
been working with other major INGAA companies (El Paso, in particular) to
make sure that the perspective and positive record of our natural gas
pipelines is heard clearly by the key legislators.

The odds of these measures (S. 2004, H.R. 3558) passing on their own is
fairly slim.   They will get a great deal of attention, however.  The Senate
Commerce Committee held a field hearing in Bellingham, Washington yesterday,
at which Senators Gorton and Murray testified along with OPS and the families
of Bellingham victims -- the press coverage was not good (i.e., USA Today
cover story "When Pipelines Are Time Bombs").   These bills (or portions of
them) will likely be offered and considered as amendments to Pipeline Safety
Reauthorization legislation as it comes before the House Transportation &
Infrastructure and Senate Commerce Committee later this year.

The increased controversy caused by these bills will likely doom efforts to
pass a pipeline safety reauthorization bill this year.   The leadership of
the House and Senate Committees will not likely want to face a bitter debate
between safety advocates, OPS, States, and industry in their committees in
this tough election year.   While this is probably a good sign, there is an
increased risk that industry may face some large hurdles in the
appropriations process.

Appropriations Legislation

While Members of Congress push for their stand alone bills and/or amendments
to reauthorization bills, the greater danger is that some of these issues
will be dealt with in an appropriations context.    In particular, the fact
that Senator Slade Gorton is now actively engaged in pushing for extensive
pipeline safety reforms is troubling -- he is a key member of the Senate
Appropriations Committee, is close to Republican leadership, and has a tough
re-election fight coming up.   Senator Murray is also on Senate
Appropriations.  Both are on the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee,
which funds OPS.

It is quite likely that the Senators will make a push to get increases in the
OPS budget for FY 2001 that would enable the kinds of reforms contemplated by
their stand-alone legislation (more state funding, more inspectors, more
R&D).  Much of this increase would be funded through increases in user fees.
INGAA indicates that it expects we could be facing increases in the range of
10-15% from FY2000.   There is also the possibility that an attempt will be
made to add legislative riders to the OPS appropriations -- such as requiring
OPS to mandate inspections, increase operator qualifications, or allow
increased state authority.   I would predict that legislative riders can be
prevented, but it will be very difficult to avoid some kind of increases
(beyond mere adjustments for inflation) in the OPS budget and user fees.

The reauthorization will indeed receive attention in 2000, but our advocacy
efforts will clearly need to be focused on the appropriations process, in
order to minimize the impact on interstate pipeline user fees and prevent
other harmful mandates.

We will continue to work with key members of the authorizing and
appropriations committees to ensure that the interstate natural gas
perspective is clearly heard and, if possible, we avoid being dragged down in
attempts to impose more strict regulation on liquids and LDCs.

Please let me know if you have questions or require additional information.
Thank you.


Sharen,

Kate Symes asked me to email you and let you know that we do verbal confirms
with Valley Electric.  We speak with Valley quite often, and confirm deals
with them over the phone.  We have never sent them paper confirms, and we
would like to keep the relationship the way it is.  If you have any questions
please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,
Stan
(503) 464-3829


Alan,
I spoke with Jeff on Tuesday regarding the overseas vehicle and where we want
to proceed.   Jeff suggested that we document the current understanding based
upon all the work which has been done to date.

We are awaiting Goldman, Sach's preferential margining treatment of Short
proceeds against longs in our current structure which would lessen the
benefits of moving overseas at this time.

Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks., Sheila


I moved the Cannon sale volumes from #170335 to #529753 effective 12/14/00.
You will need to re-nom #529753 for all prior days at zero and then allocate
volumes at each meter from the old deal to the new deal.  Let me know if you
have any questions.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
12/14/2000 07:28 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Daren,

Should I change the counterparty on this sale, or is that handled by
marketing?  Also, we may need to look at changing the Storage Agmt.   Please
advise.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers@ECT
12/13/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Has the volumes for the deal below been nomd' yet under the new deal.  Credit
is having a cow because they are showing exposure still under Cannon.  Is
there a way that we can get this done tomorrow?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 05:05
PM ---------------------------

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee
Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 04:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           12/12/2000 03:29 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

Julie,

Cannon is not a wellhead producer.  The meters below are assigned to the
following individuals:

Meter #  Scheduler

68  Mary Poorman
4132  Jackie Young
1040  Aimee Lannou
1606  Mary Poorman

These schedulers should be advised of the changes.

Bob

Julie Meyers
12/12/2000 01:49 PM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: cannon assignment

New deal 529753.

Robert, please do your magic.

Kris, I'm not sure who in your group this should go to, this is a sale.

Julie

Brant Reves
12/11/2000 12:24 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cannon assignment

The trades below were originally executed between HPL and Cannon Interests
Houston per terms of a specific Master Physical Agreement.  After recieving
back executed documentation, we are ready to have the trades offically moved
within the various Enron capuring systems from Cannon to Kinder Morgan Texas
Pipeline, Inc. per the terms and conditions of the recently executed Master
Physical Agreement between HPL and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Inc.

First, here are the TAG Nos. of the trades we wish to have assigned.

NU2813
NA0376

Second, several trades are listed within a ERMS book called:  P A M
These trades show a 12-31-00 expiry and their Nos. are:

522284
830689
892696
904035
904276

I am not sure what these numbers are.  But, could you move them as well.

Thanks for your help.

brant


Hey Melissa,

Are you back from Brazil yet?  Hope they didn't work you too hard down
there.  Drop me a line when you get a chance.


Trena,

3:00 PM is fine.

Patti

Trena McFarland@ENRON
10/18/2000 09:22 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Mtg w/ Sally Beck

could I make this 3.00 if possible?

Thanks
Trena


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 02:33 PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	04/10/2001 02:03 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ECT, Randy Pais@Enron
		 Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

I will copy the writ to each of you immediately.

Mr. Sanders, as you now have the privilege of handling our litigation, I am
looking for your recommendation on how to staff this from a litigation point
of view will someone in your group or the Corp litigation unit do the
courtroom work?

FYI, Bob Vote helped us on the prior garnishment on EECC filed by Dennis
Delewski against CIGSA, did a fine job, and knows the players, and I would be
glad to have his help again. Please us know what you would like to do.

Randy Pais will work it from within EEOS legal.

I have not yet notified Jim Derrick, thinking that either you or Mark might
want to. I am quite happy to call him if you like.

JWVS
----- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/10/2001 01:54
PM -----

	John Schwartzenburg
	04/10/2001 01:53 PM

		 To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Kenneth L Bean/HOU/EES@EES, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian
Stanley/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth L
Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, johng@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
steved@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, danielh@nepco.com, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Randy Pais@Enron, Jim
Desrochers/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Claudia Santos@Enron, Wyndel McNamara@ENRON, Richard
Murphy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley
Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kristi
Dobbs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mayra Mendez@Enron, Angie
Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Vote@ENRON, Joseph T Grajewski/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Brand@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Pearson/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladimir
Gorescu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: URGENT STOP PAYMENT: Writ of Garnishment of money due CIGSA served
on EECC on April 10

EECC has just been served with a writ of garnishment from the 333rd Judicial
District Court of Harris County  in connection with a judgment against
certain CIGSA entities. In the writ, the court very unambiguously and very
plainly commands that EECC is not to pay any debt or deliver any property to
CIGSA pending further orders from  the court. The writ was issued to enforce
an judgment  for $1.3 million awarded by the court against CIGSA in favor of
Richard P Estrada. EECC is also commanded to appear before the court and list
all funds/assets in our possession that might belong to CIGSA,  and to
disclose what other persons we know ofif any, that might have such funds or
assets.  The lawyer for Mr. Estrada is the same lawyer who successfully
garnished EECC in the past to collect sums owed other CIGSA judgment
creditors.

Please take this prohibition as applying even to cases where CIGSA might be
entitled to the money or the property under our contracts with them, or where
the funds or property are in joint venture acounts or custody in the US or
Mexico until we have had a chance to review matters in detail and make a more
accurate assessment. In the meantime, effective immediately, do not make ANY
payments to or on behalf of, or release ANY property to or on behalf of, any
CIGSA entity without first obtaining legal department approval. The court may
impose penalties for violations  of its garnishment order.

We will assemble an appropriate litigation team to work onthis matter. Randy
Pais will be handling this for EEOS legal. I suggest that Mike Pearson and
Mark Brand get the word out to the Project Management and Project Control
teams on  this matter ASAP.

JWVS


Dear Sally,

Please call me if you would like me to walk you through this.

Thanks

Shona


Broker is right - deal has been changed.

By the way, I checked out audit viewer on deal 505066, and it showed that I
had changed the deal from Amerex to APB yesterday afternoon. It didn't show
any other changed after that - so I've put a call into Duong Luu to figure
out why the change didn't save, or why it defaulted back. Just FYI.

Stephanie Piwetz   01/26/2001 02:25 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: dEAL 506503.01

 Kate,
Richter
please check 506503.01  Enron Sells SCEM/Mirant
we show sp-15 in system, Bloomberg has Np-15
25 mws    280.00     feb 2001

Thanks


just did.  let me know what she says.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:53 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

you better not.  you better not EVER tell anyone about that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:51 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

oh.   that is different than your first response. quite different.  i am
going to email your friend jen and see what she thinks.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:42 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   ok, she didn't say she was ugly, she said she saw a resemblance between
   us
   but that i was smaller and better than her.  i agree with her.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:35 AM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   your mom didn't say she was ugly.  stop lying.  i think that girl is hot
   so
   i don't care.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:29 AM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:

      well, i asked my mom if she thinks i look like that bonnie girl and
   she
      thinks you are insane and that i should never talk to you again for
      insulting me so badly.  i told you that girl was ugly.

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Hello, Sweetness! Sorry I didn't get back to you right away. You guys should
come here! It is awesome! Jody, Eric Neibhur, and I drove up into the
mountains on Sunday and played in the snow. It was awesome. We got there in
less than an hour after stopping twice to look at the view. I tried to make
a snow angel, but it was more of an ice angel, really. Neither Jody nor Eric
had gloves, so they weren't too keen on making snowballs and throwing them
at me. Still, we had a great time.

Sat. we went to see this performance group Fischerspooner in sort of the
equivalent of the Rice Hotel while it was under construction. They wore
crazy costumes and danced around and sang over djed music. It was pretty
cool, especially since we snuck in the back door, even though it was free,
since we didn't have reservations. (I made an animation of it. I'm trying to
figure out how to put it online for y'all!) Then we went to Chinatown for
art openings, and that was really cool. Then we went to a renovated bowling
alley to see a secret show by Kim Deal, but she didn't play cuz supposedly
Kelly Deal got married that day. But there was an alright band w/ the most
Amazingly cute girl singer, so it all good.

So you guys have to come here! Come here! C'mere!

See yu on Fri at Jessica's opening at Lawndale, then on Sat at the wedding.
Yeah!!!!!

xoxoxox,
Al Herrmann
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


This is to remind everyone on our scheduled EOL meetings. These will be held
as from next Monday 24th, until the final implementation. This week, Michael
and myself will meet in Houston with everyone in that office who is included
in this implementation process.
Please give me your comments.

Patrick


Privileged and Confidential - For Instruction of
Counsel                                                 Attached is a revised
copy of the Background note discussed earlier this week.  The revisions are
based on comments  from Frontier Economics and GPC, and further reflection by
Rob Hemstock and myself. I have also attached the  raw calculations from
Frontier that underlie several of the revisions.  I have not  sent the
revised document to outside counsel for review.


In Search of Winning Stocks

This Week: Low Volume Stocks With Strong Buying Pressure

1.  Low Volume Stocks Coming Under Strong Buying Pressure
2.  Search Criteria
3.  One Low Volume Stock Coming Under Strong Buying Pressure
4.  Disclaimer

***********************Our Sponsor*************************
THE MOST EXPENSIVE INVESTMENT NEWSLETTER OUT THERE.

Don't you think there's a good reason that more than
99% of its members continue to subscribe?

100% GUARANTEED --->

http://clyde.investools.com/T/A28.146.750.1.113719

************************************************************

Wall Street City's Stock Search of the Week

1.  Low Volume Stocks Coming Under Strong Buying Pressure

The September 11 attacks and the recent anthrax outbreaks
have pushed several thinly-traded stocks into the spotlight.
Traders who identified these stocks early in their breakouts
were able to benefit from substantial short-term percentile
gains, particularly since the stocks had already traded up
on extremely high levels of volume before the investment
media began to draw attention to the upward moves.  Thus the
importance of being to identify such moves early in the
breakout cannot be understated.

Low Volume Stocks Coming Under Strong Buying Pressure is a
search strategy that allows traders and investors to find
such stocks.  The strategy defines illiquid stocks as having
average volume of 5,000 to 250,000 shares per day.  Within
this universe, stocks are screened for upward price movement
on volume levels that are at least 50 percent greater than
average, with emphasis placed on those stocks with highest
levels of relative volume.  The results produce a list of
thinly-stocks that may be in the midst of significant upward
moves.

The search strategy is designed for those investors who are
looking for short-term trading opportunities and have a very
high tolerance for risk.  Because of the volatility inherent
in the search results, interested investors should consider
running the search strategy on an intraday basis.  Investors
can click below to see the results.

http://clyde.investools.com/T/A28.146.750.2.113719

2.  Search Criteria

By subscribing to Wall Street City, investors can utilize
Power ProSearch to build a search like the one below,
created by Wall Street City analysts, to identify
thinly-traded stocks that are trading upwards on unusually
high volume.

Indicator                     Mode
------------------------------------------------------------
Volume 30-Day Average         Between  5.0 - 250.0
Rel Performance 1-Day         Between  101.0 - 99999.9
Volume Ratio 1/30 Day         Between  150.0 - 99999.9, High
Industry Group                Display Only
Stock Exchange                ALL US MARKETS

Investors can click below to view the search stategy's
results.

http://clyde.investools.com/T/A28.146.750.3.113719

3.  One Low Volume Stock Coming Under Strong Buying Pressure

As of 12:00 p.m. EST today, shares of Axonyx {AXYX} were
trading up by over 48 percent on volume that was more than
16 times that of the 30-day average.  The company announced
this morning that it would begin providing the U.S. Army
Research Institute of Chemical Defense with compounds to test
against chemical warfare agents such as Sarin gas.  AXYX is
currently developing therapies to improve memory impairment
stemming from Alzheimer's disease and has found that its
acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors compete with lethal
chemical agents to protect the AChE enzyme.

Investors can click below to view the search stategy's
results.

http://clyde.investools.com/T/A28.146.750.4.113719

***********************Our Sponsor*************************
Visionary George Gilder ID's the Greatest Opportunity Yet!

George Gilder knows how real money is made: invest early in
companies with ascending technologies. He ID'd Qualcomm when
it sold for $4.75 (it grew to $200), Broadcom at $6.00 (to
$253) and many more. But today's trillion-dollar opportunity
can dwarf them all. Click here now for your FREE report:
http://sub.digitalpowerreport.com/c/go/XDPR/WSCE-xdprTA5?s=S930&D=XGLD
***********************************************************

4.	Disclaimer

WallStreetCity's Stock Search of the Week is published
solely for informational purposes and is not a solicitation
or an offer to buy or sell any stock, mutual fund or other
security.  The information obtained from internal and
external sources is considered reliable, but has not been
independently verified for accuracy and completeness.
WallStreetCity, its employees, and/or officers and directors,
may from time to time have a position in the securities
mentioned and may sell or buy such securities.
Trading involves risk, including possible loss of principle
and other losses.  Trading results may vary. No
representations are being made that these techniques will
result in or guarantee profits in trading.  Past performance
is no indication of future results.

REMOVE ME FROM THIS FREE EMAIL LIST
To be removed from the email distribution list for the FREE
WallStreetCity's Industry Group Analysis Commentary, Stock
Search of the Week Commentary, The Week Ahead Commentary
and Updates simply click the link below and hit "Send" on
the email that is launched. (Or copy and paste the email
address below to a new outgoing email message and hit "Send"
on the email that is launched).

mailto:U-A28.146.113719@newsletter.wallstreetcity.com

If you have tried unsubscribing in the past -- and believe
that you received this message in error -- please send an
email to

mailto:yourfeedback@wallstreetcity.com

to voice your concerns and be removed from the list.


she's not allowed to go anymore per ENE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

are you talking about JS?  thought she was going to kentucky?  I was going with my friend Elizabeth but she is probobly going to have to work on Friday.  So I may just ride back with her.  Trying to figure it  all out.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:

I spose so but we might have to take stupid as well I just found out.


(See attached file: HPLN1027.xls)

 - HPLN1027.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
12:41 PM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
02/05/2001 01:01 PM
To: Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Curve Fetch

Let me know if either of you have questions.

Greg