----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 07:20 AM -----

	"Cregan, Nora" <ncregan@mdbe.com>
	04/01/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: "Sanders, Richard" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "'mcohen@ggfcmk.com'"
<mcohen@ggfcmk.com>, "'ghenken@ggfcmk.com'" <ghenken@ggfcmk.com>,
"'rcarroll@bracepatt.com'" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, "Lubic, Michael"
<MLubic@mdbe.com>, "Burns, David A. Esq." <David.Burns@bakerbotts.com>
		 cc: "Jines, Michael" <mike-jines@reliantenergy.com>, "Sheryl Gussett
(E-mail)" <Sheryl.gussett@reliantenergy.com>, "Pickett, Donn"
<dpickett@mdbe.com>, "Houlihan, Terry" <thoulihan@mdbe.com>, "Morrissey,
John" <JMorrissey@mdbe.com>, "McManus, Randy" <rmcmanus@bakerbotts.com>
		 Subject: Revised inverse condemnation complaint

E-MAIL NOTICE

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of
the original message. Thank you.

To reply to our E-mail Administrator directly, send an email to
Postmaster@mdbe.com or call (415) 393-2000 and delete this email.

McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP

http://www.mccutchen.com

Attached for your comments is a revised complaint in inverse condemnation,
with the PX and Reliant as plaintiffs.? I am sending it separately to Susan
Rossi, in-house counsel for the PX.? Since our last conference call we've
discussed the various forums and pending actions with FERC counsel for
Reliant and Enron. My understanding is that the PX wants us to act and will
cooperate with us.?

Marc, I haven't circulated this to the whole group because I wanted to go
through you.? What is the appropriate next step?? A call with the
decisionmakers on this issue so that we can make a plan to move forward?? Can
we do that Monday or Tuesday?

I've set out Reliant's conclusions here.?

1. There is no forum other than California state court in which we can get
compensation for the commandeered contracts because of the Eleventh Amendment
issue.

2. Filing the inverse condemnation action is not inconsistent with the FERC
proceeding in Tucson Electric.

3. Filing the inverse condemnation action is not inconsistent with Duke v.
Davis or with any other proceeding anyone may want to bring alleging that the
commandeering itself was illegal (e.g. on preemption grounds).

4.? As we discussed, nobody (including PG&E and SCE) wants the Board of
Control to be deciding anything if we can avoid it.? We would suggest going
along with the PX's suggestion that the bankruptcy court should be staying
the Board of Control action because of the interventions of SCE and PG&E, who
are taking the position that the compensation should go to them.? Then, we
can go forward with the inverse condemnation action in state court (we picked
LA as the forum because LA residents are less affected by the energy crisis
than most others in the state, and because it's convenient). If PG&E and SCE
are permitted to intervene in the state court action, we can stipulate to
relief from stay so that it can go forward.? This way, the Board of Control
is effectively stayed while the state court action goes forward.

5.? Richard Sanders expressed the very real concern that we don't want SCE
and PG&E's defenses to liquidation of the block forward contracts to be
decided anywhere but FERC.? We think we should be able to avoid that: since
SCE and PG&E have already put the issue squarely before FERC, that defense
could be stayed under the primary jurisdiction doctrine pending FERC's
decision.? We would argue that the whole case need not be stayed in the
meantime, since the governor's duty to compensate holds no matter who is owed
the compensation, and any proceeds from PX contracts will be funneled into
the Moreno escrow account.

6.? As we also discussed, we can file this complaint in the name of the PX,
Reliant, and any other market participants who want to be plaintiffs (we just
need names and a few facts to allege for each plaintiff). Or, as someone
suggested, if the PX Market Participants Committee is an entity that has
standing, it could be filed in that name along with the PX.? Either way, the
prayer for relief asks that all funds be deposited in the Moreno escrow
account for disposition consistent with FERC's decision in Coral Power.

?
 - 21315587_2.DOC


I think that's fine.

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 05/16/2001 09:55:02 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

I will be available at 1:30 pm CST today.  With regard to turning the
document, I will be traveling on Thursday.  Therefore, I believe the
earliest I could have a draft of the agreement (w/o exhibits, w/o
override letter) is Friday evening.  If we could wait until Monday
delivery, I could have drafts of both the agreement and exhibits.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001
08:58
AM ---------------------------

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 05/16/2001 08:49 AM

To:   Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
      Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
      Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:  Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help  (Document
      link: Kay Mann)

Yes. Let's do 1:30 for an internal call.  I'll get Suzanne to send out
the
dial-in instructions.  Let's make sure that the GE guys know NOT to call
in.  Thanks!.  I know that John Schwartzenburg will be late since he is
TurboParking until 2 pm but let's proceed at 1:30.

                    Scott

                    Dieball@ENRON_D       To:     Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
                    EVELOPMENT            cc:     John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
                                          Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT,
John
                    05/16/2001
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
                    07:15 AM              Subject:     Re: GE- Standard
Domestic Contract- Need your
                                          help(Document link: Sheila
Tweed)

Read your notes re scheduling a call w/ or w/o GE.  From John's and my
perspective, it seems that we should first have an internal call re the
consolidation of our assignments from weeks past  into Peter's draft
contract and then send to GE for their review and follow up call either
later this week or next.  Steve Swift is OK with this approach.

At the moment we seem to be knee deep w/GE and Owner on Arcos and
suspect
that 9:30 CST (3:30 London time) will be difficult for us to call in.
Instead, 1:30 CST would work better for us.

If this works for the Houston gang could you let us know soonest and we
will let Mike and Steve know as well.

                    Sheila

                    Tweed@ECT            To:     John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
                                         cc:     Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Kay
                    05/15/2001           Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

                    04:18 PM             Subject:     Re: GE- Standard
Domestic Contract- Need your
                                         help(Document link: Scott
Dieball)

Would you all be in a posiotion to get together tomorrow morning at 9:30
am
Houston time to review the issues list and  talk about how we get to the
end of this process with GE.  We immediately need to start the drafting
of
the Longview turbine contract and I'd like to see if we are close enough
to
get that started.  Scott, today the extension to the Agreement in
Principle
expires and we need to extend.  Can you tee this up with Steve Swift?
Our
meeting tomorrow will be in lieu of the regularly scheduled GE call.
I'll
let them know we will call them later this week or we'll talk next
Wednesday, but I would like to get through whatever we need to in order
to
get the Longview Turbine Contract going.
I've talked to John Schwartzenburg about this and he is available
tomorrow
morning.


Firstly, Dave is not responsible for the initial creation of these numbers which was done by Brad Richter before Dave joined the group.  I presume it was based on Brad's evaluations.

I suggest we wait another week to see the structure of the transaction before moving numbers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Denny, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:42 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject: Proposed Retention Bonuses for Netco
Sensitivity: Confidential

Louise,
I am sorry to bother you at such a critical time, because I know you are doing everything you can to salvage the remaining pieces at Enron and are working long & tiresome hours to achieve this difficult matter.
However, I felt like I had to at least let you know my thoughts on the following.

Dave Forster & I met a couple of weeks ago on his initiative to discuss the proposed retention bonuses for my group. I was asked to review the preliminary numbers by individual. I was allowed to move dollars but NOT allowed to increase the total dollar figure for my group. Frankly, the numbers seemed pretty low.

Assuming the goal is to retain key employees for Netco, I am not confident these numbers will achieve this.
I know several people in my group are interviewing outside of the company. I have asked them to be patient, not make any quick decisions, and give us a chance to see this through.

Dave told me the figures were based on mid year evaluations. As you know, mid year evaluations are typically lower than year end. The mid year evaluation allows the employee time to improve in order to get to the desired level by year end. I understand the need for a reference point of some sort and mid year was the latest figure available. However, because the retention numbers were based on this, they are significantly lower.

My intentions are not to show any disrepect to Dave by discussing this with you but I wanted to make sure my thoughts /opinions were communicated to you. If Dave has already discussed this with you, I apologize for the duplication.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. I am on holiday & will be traveling today but can be reached on my cell at 713-446-9669.

Thank you for your time.
Jennifer


Hi Shari

Hope all is well.
Count me in for the group present.
See ya next week if not earlier

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	SStack@reliant.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-SStack+40reliant+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 2:24 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan; jcrespo@hess.com; wfhenze@jonesday.com; dperlman@powersrc.com; rosteen@powersrc.com; babak.pooya@southernenergy.com; drusso@reliant.com; AKatz@eei.org; fmdutton@aep.com; sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com; nagels@epenergy.com
Cc:	ntillett@reliant.com
Subject:	Shhhh.... it's a SURPRISE !

Dede Russo and I are planning to have a surprise baby shower for Marty Jo
Rogers from Axia at some point during the two-day EEI Working Group session
next week. We will arrange to have cake, balloons and a few presents.  All
you participants are invited to the shower and if I have missed sending
someone on this email - please forward it on to them.

Regarding presents, I will buy group presents for the baby this weekend.
You can either contribute to this or do something on your own (p.s. it is a
boy). If you would like to go in on the group present, you can discreetly
give me money next week but please let me know if so by email NO LATER THAN
THIS FRIDAY so I can plan accordingly. I would imagine that $10 per person
would be plenty.

Please call me (713) 207-5233 or Dede (713) 207-5240 if you have any
questions.

Thanks!

Shari


no thank you not at this time.
m


This is a bit of info I asked Earline to check out for me...just passing this
along in case you are asked.
----- Forwarded by Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott on 06/20/00 05:12 PM -----

	Earline Kendall@ECT
	06/20/00 04:44 PM

		 To: Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott
		 cc:
		 Subject: Audit Committee Coverage Under Corp D&O

In response to your inquiry, we have been advised by our insurance broker,
McGriff Seibles, that our present D&O policy does not need to be amended to
cover the 1999 Securities and Exchange Commission rules covering the duties
of the audit committee

Earline Kendall


Mike, these are our attorney's comments to the comments you provided me on
the Release Letter.  Give me a call and we can discuss, or if you prefer, we
can schedule a time to get the attorneys involved in the discussion.

Thanks,

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001 01:37 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec@ECT
	04/25/2001 09:58 AM

		 To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Phillips Letter Revisions

Mark,  The following are my responses to Phillip's changes in our letter
agreement:

1.  1st Sentence of Second Paragraph - Strike of reference to Section 3.3 and
reference to Appendix 1 - ENA's right to decrease confirmed volumes and
Phillips' rights to release the gas are clearly set out in Section 3.3.  The
"Operations/Delivery Scheduling Procedures" only are the method by which this
is effected.  This change needs to be removed.

2.  1st Sentence of Second Paragraph  - The remainder of the changes to the
1st Sentence except for the strike of Seller's Daily Deliverability are OK.
Seller's Daily Deliverability needs to remain as this is the correct
terminology under the Purchase Agreement.  All we are doing here is effecting
the provisions of the Purchase Agreement to which both parties have already
agreed.

3.  The added sentence at the end of the second paragraph - This needs to be
stricken.  The Medicine Bow System is not ENA's and we do not want to create
a firm purchase deal with this letter.

4.  1st Sentence of Third Paragraph - The add from "that quantity of Gas.....
to.......... (the "Released Gas"" should be removed.  The term Released Gas
is defined under the Purchase Agreement and doesn't need to be defined in
this letter.   I am OK with ENA "hereby" agreeing to waive any and all rights
it has to under Section 3.3 to recall the Gas.  However,  the term rights ENA
"may" have needs to be stricken.  ENA's position is that we have the right to
recall the gas as long as it hasn't been released longer than 120 days.

If you wish to discuss these comments or would like me to discuss these with
Phillips, I would be happy to do so.


TODAY: Ben Macklin, senior analyst with eMarketer, dissects the acquisition
price of AT&T's (T) broadband unit by Comcast (CMCSA). We also offer a pair of
perspectives on e-commerce, which seems to be making a comeback in some
circles.

Also below, we offer Multex Investor members an exclusive opportunity to sign
up for a free research trial from Morgan Stanley, and to read up on JDS
Uniphase (JDSU).

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Top Wall Street Watcher Ben Zacks: +51.7%/year 5-Year Gain!

Moving with the best and brightest of Wall Street's big-
money machines earned Ben Zacks a +51.7% five-year average
annual gain. Start outperforming long-term. Get Zacks'
latest 13-stock buylist with your FREE 30-day trial:

http://www.multexinvestor.com/jp.asp?id=nl_INT_020702_a1
==============================================================

Below
---------

Investment ideas
Broker reports
Free and sponsored reports

==============================================================

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. Strong buys: Enterprise is looking up
There is cautious optimism among enterprise software developers.

By Shannon Swingle, contributing editor

Business could be picking up for enterprise software companies, but only a few analysts
are moving into upgrade territory. The most recent quarterly reports for a handful of
companies showed strong results, but only time will tell.

This week, two enterprise software companies in Multex's Internet index have moved
into the "strong buy" territory among the average recommendations. Those companies are
Mercury Interactive (MERQ) and Siebel Systems (SEBL). So what is making analysts
take notice of these companies?

Click here to read more:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6611&nd=0207

2. Broadly viewed: What is the value of the digital home?
Comcast is paying approximately $5,830 for each AT&T Broadband household. Is this a fair price?

By Ben Macklin, senior analyst, eMarketer

Comcast (CMCSA) is in the process of acquiring AT&T's (T) broadband unit and its 12
million cable households for approximately $70 billion. Comcast's investment equates to
approximately $5,830 per AT&T Broadband household.  Is this a fair price?

As has been widely reported, this deal will create the largest cable company in North
America, with 22.3 million subscribers. The current value of the digital home is far less
than what Comcast is currently paying, but the future digital home may hold great
potential.

Click here to read more:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6635&nd=0207

3. Take a bow: Can eBay give investors an encore?
The company is confident that it can maintain super-fast growth, and analysts agree.

by Dave Sterman, equity research columnist

The economic landscape is littered with the carcasses of dot-coms that tried but
failed. Only one firm can say that it consistently delivered on its initial growth
metrics: eBay (EBAY). In 1998, when the online auction company went public, it
was set to bag some $86 million in revenue. Three years later, that figure has
exploded to $749 million, and operating profits have risen thirteen-fold.

With shares of eBay trading at lofty heights, investors are clearly expecting more strong
growth to come. Can eBay deliver? The answer, according to those who analyze the
company, is a resounding "yes."

Click here to read more:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6765&nd=0207

4. E-commerce insights: E-commerce comes out from under the shadows
Companies used to be reluctant to discuss Internet sales, but are now breaking the silence

By Steve Butler, senior analyst, eMarketer

Until recently, many companies were reluctant to discuss e-commerce because
they did not want to share their strategies with competitors. Today, however,
companies announce e-business initiatives to show that they are in tune with the
times and prepared to face tough competition in the future.

By comparing a company's e-commerce activity to that of its competitors, shareholders
may gain insight into how well management has grasped the main issues of e-business,
developed an integrated technology strategy, and executed its vision.

Click here to read more:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/article.asp?docid=6769&nd=0207

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Scottrade Offers Quality Customer Service and $7 Trades. Request
Scottrade information today! Top-notch customer service and competitive
pricing with low commissions boost Scottrade to rank  #1 Online Broker
by Kiplinger's Personal Finance. Over 147 U.S. offices staffed with
knowledgeable, personal brokers. No inactivity fees. Apply now!

http://www.multexinvestor.com/jp.asp?id=nl_INT_020702_a2
==============================================================

Broker reports
-----------------------------------------

1. SPECIAL REPORT: You've got earnings

FBR's analysts suggest that investors ignore the open access question and
focus on the content growth capabilities of the company. The firm breaks down results by
business segment and provides its current investment opinion. (7-page report for purchase
- $25)
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=26126718&nd=0207

2. WHAT'S HOT?: Bear Stearns publishes a 'top ten list' of Internet security predictions for 2002.

After a page of general sector commentary, the firm discusses its list; #3
prediction calls for more sophisticated virus attacks, #6 prediction is that
the biometric hype fizzles, #10 predicts security vendor stocks that will
outperform. (4-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=25966746&nd=0207

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Enjoy the worlds first fully flat bed in business class, and two
FREE tickets. Simply enroll in Executive Club, fly Club World
before April 15, 2002, and youll get two free economy tickets
to anywhere British Airways flies. Fly Flat.  Fly Free.

http://www.multexinvestor.com/jp.asp?id=nl_INT_020702_a3
==============================================================

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT:
The scoop on AOL

In addition to its standard scorecard for a variety of metrics,
including growth, profitability, and financial health, the firm gives an unusually
unequivocal "buy" recommendation to the stock, which it believes is undervalued.
This three page report, which is usually sold for $10, is free to Multex Investor
members like you for the next 72 hours.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=21427461&nd=0207

2. FREE SPONSOR REPORT:

Morgan Stanley says that JDS Uniphase (JDSU) remains "well positioned to gain share in the optical component market."

The firm gives JDSU a "neutral-volatile" rating, saying "we would be buyers of the stock
in the $6 range." To read its assessment of key strengths and weaknesses, register for the
firm's free-research trial and get the report for free.
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/download.asp?docid=26159265&sid=8&nd=0207

================================================================

Click here to register at Multex Investor:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/registration/regWrapA1Basic.asp

Click here for The Internet Analyst homepage:
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

================================================================
To remove yourself from this mailing list, please REPLY to THIS
email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. To
remove yourself from ALL Multex Investor mailings, including the
Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

Please email your feedback to The Internet Analyst, include TIA in
the subject line at:
investor.feedback@multex.com

Please send your questions and comments to:
investor.help@multex.com

Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
advertise@multex.com

Like a specific article? Now you can send it to a friend with just
a click. Check out the send to a friend feature next to each article.

To advertise in this e-mail, ASK FOR TIA at:
advertise@multex.com


---------------------- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on
08/21/2000 10:01 AM ---------------------------

"Michael Gagliardi" <mggagliardi@duke-energy.com> on 08/21/2000 07:25:33 AM

To:   DGagliardi@reliantenergy.com, David_Ricks@GSDM.com
cc:

Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail 72

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael
Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on 08/21/2000 07:34 AM
---------------------------

TruOrange@aol.com on 08/19/2000 10:57:39 PM

To:   TruOrange@aol.com
cc:    (bcc: Michael Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC)
Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail 72

True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service
Volume 8, Fax/E-Mail #72, Saturday, August 19, 2000
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
Phone
512-795-8536

Roy Williams Stars Again; Brown Says Scaife Upbeat

This may sound like a repeat of an earlier fax, but freshman WR Roy
Williams
caught so many long passes Saturday that I lost count. Williams is so big
and
fast and smooth that he makes difficult catches look surprisingly easy.
I talked to one veteran Longhorn coach who told me Williams is easily the
best freshman wide receiver he has ever coached or seen. "He's kind of a
combination of Mike Williams and Lovell Pinkney," the coach said. "He's
even
faster than Mike, he's nearly as tall as Lovell and he catches the ball
better than either of them."
Freshmen receivers normally need some time to adjust to the way DBs jam
them
at the line of scrimmage, but Williams just runs through jams, then outruns
or outjumps whichever veteran DB has the misfortune to be trying to cover
him.
Coach Mack Brown said some of the veteran defensive backs came out to watch
the freshmen practice before the varsity checked in and saw Williams
running
wild, and some of the other freshman WRs looking very good, too. "Some of
those defensive guys said things were going to change when they get with
us,"
Brown said, then added with a chuckle, "but it hasn't changed much. They
(the
freshmen WRs) still look pretty good."
Sloan Thomas, B. J. Johnson and Tony Jeffery are the other three freshmen
WRs, and they also are making strong bids for playing time, but there is no
question that, right now, Williams is the brightest of the young star
receivers.
In addition to outstanding size, speed and body control, he makes quick
adjustment while the ball is in the air to get in just the right position
to
make the catch. If you haven't been to a Longhorn practice, you should come
to one just to see Williams in action.
Brown said there is a very good chance that all four of the freshmen WRs
will
play this year. "The thing we are going to try to do is win," he said. "If
they can help us win, they'll play, and they are looking pretty good right
now."
* * * *
Brown said sophomore TE Bo Scaife is reasonably upbeat about the
season-ending knee injury he suffered Friday about one hour deep into the
first varsity practice. "He said it was great that he played last year, so
he
can count this as his redshirt year," Brown said.
Brown also said the doctors said the injury is not as severe as the one
Scaife suffered to his other knee in high school.
* * * *
FOOTBALL NOTES: Kris Stockton is the starting punter and place kicker right
now. . . Brown said the team goal is to average 38 yards in net punting
this
season, which would be about nine yards better than the average last
season.
. . QB Major Applewhite still isn't showing any ill effects of off-season
knee surgery. . . Backup LB O. J. McClintock has intercepted two passes
during the two days of varsity practices. . . Freshman Stevie Lee and
redshirt freshman Marcus Tubbs are backing up star senior DTs Casey Hampton
and Shaun Rogers, and defensive coordinator Carl Reese says he expects big
things out of the two youngsters this season. . . Brown said Chad Stevens,
a
former tight end, will stay at fullback "because we're going to move our
fullback up to a tight end spot at times to have a two-tight-end look."
* * * *
RECRUITING NOTES: The Longhorns' 12 early commitments include two players
who
are on almost all of the national top 100 lists

- OLs Jonathan Scott of
Dallas Carter and Abe Robinson of Houston Jersey Village
- and another who
was on all the lists two years ago
- OL Alfio Randall of Blinn JC. UT also is
in great shape with  five other players who are on most national top 100
lists
- QB Brett Rawls of Shreveport Evangel, RB Cedric Benson of Midland, DT
Tommie Harris of Killeen Elllison, LB Derrick Johnson of Waco and S DeWayne
Brandon of Temple. DE Eric Hall of Clarksville, Tenn., is on several
national
top 100 lists, and he is a strong Texas lean.
* * * *
My next fax will be Sunday, August 20.
* * * *
The True Orange Fax Service includes  at  least  99 faxes  a year and costs
$99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes  26 newsletters
and
is published weekly during football season and twice monthly during most of
the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both for $130 (or
$110
if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take the faxes and
newsletter
via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also  update my
900 number
- 1-900-288-8839
- frequently with recruiting news. My E-Mail
address is: truorange@aol.com


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
ANDREWS, NAVEEN C               RUDI C ZIPTER                   Oct 31, 2000
BAXTER, ASHLEY                  DAVID DAVIES                    Nov 02, 2000
CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J             WINCENTY J KAMINSKI             Oct 26, 2000
KINDALL, KEVIN                  VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 30, 2000
LAMAS VIEIRA PINTO, RODRIGO     DAVID PORT                      Oct 31, 2000
SUPATGIAT, CHONAWEE             PEYTON S GIBNER                 Oct 27, 2000
TAMARCHENKO, TANYA V            VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 26, 2000
VILLARREAL, NORMA E             SHEILA H WALTON                 Oct 26, 2000
WALTON, SHEILA H                DAVID OXLEY                     Oct 27, 2000
YAMAN, SEVIL                    VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 27, 2000
YUAN, DING                      RICHARD L CARSON                Oct 31, 2000


Sreve,

12 o'clock will work for me. Any food, except for sushi. I have to leave at
1:00
for the airport.

Vince

Steven Leppard
02/21/2000 04:07 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wednesday lunch with Lane Hughston

Vince

Lane expects Wednesday 12pm will be OK for lunch - he'll meet us here at the
office.  Lane will confirm this later today, and I'll book a local
restaurant.  Have you any food preferences?

Steve


What's up with the ads for the NY times, WSJ, and FT?  (Crude and product
traders)

Jeff


A mandatory meeting requested by Ray Bowen has been scheduled for today at 2:00 PM in EB 2021 to discuss cash forecasting requirements.

We apologize for the short notice.

Thank you,

Betty Tauzier
Enron Corp Treasury
EB 2014
713-853-9817


Notice # 01-147
May 4, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Use of Letters of Credit, Certain Securities and Deliverable Warehouse
Receipts as Margin  for NYMEX and COMEX Transactions

DATE:
May 4, 2001
===========================================================

! Please be advised that the NYMEX Board of Directors has approved changes to
NYMEX and COMEX Clearing Association rules, which have also been filed with
the CFTC, that expand the types of non-cash assets that customers may deposit
with their Clearing Members for margin purposes.

! Specifically, the rule changes, which are attached below, permit the use of
letters of credit, certain securities and deliverable warehouse receipts by
customers to meet their margin requirements. The rule changes provide for
consistent treatment in the use of such assets for both NYMEX and COMEX
Divisions.

! Letters of Credit.  As a result of the rule changes, letters of credit
(LCs) now will be allowed for customer margin on both divisions.

! Use of Letters of Credit on Pass-Through Basis.  In addition, the rule
changes allow letters of credit to be used on a &pass-through8 basis on both
divisions.  In other words, Clearing Members on both divisions will be able
to pledge to the applicable clearinghouse certain LCs posted by customers. It
should be noted that while securities and deliverable warehouse receipts, as
detailed below, may be used by customers for margin purposes, such assets may
not be used on a pass-through basis by a Clearing Member to meet its margin
obligations with the clearinghouse.

! Securities. Customers also will be able to deposit with their Clearing
Members certain types of securities as margin. The types of acceptable
securities are the kinds of securities that have been accepted for some time
on the COMEX Division.  Specifically, the rule changes will permit customers
to deposit the following types of securities as margin with Clearing Members
on either division:

securities listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or the
American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the over-the-counter
market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Board except that such securities must be free from liens and encumbrances;
can represent no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any one
issuer; and will be valued for purposes of margin at 75% of their market
value.

! Deliverable Warehouse Receipts. On both divisions, deliverable warehouse
receipts for any of the commodities traded on the Exchange will be accepted
as customer margin provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no
more than 75% of the value of the commodity.

! Effective Date. These rule changes will go into effect on June 1, 2001.

! Exchange Form for Pass-Through Letters of Credit.  A follow-up Notice to
Clearing Members will be distributed shortly that will include a form
prepared by NYMEX that will serve as the authorized  uniform form for
irrevocable letters of credit for use on a pass-through basis at the Exchange
.

If you have any questions concerning this change, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance Section,
NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928; or Joseph Sanguedolce,
Director, Financial Surveillance Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2855,.

AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 4.01 (&CUSTOMER,S MARGINS8), NYMEX RULE 9.05
(&MARGINS8) AND TO COMEX CLEARING ASSOCIATION RULE 48 (&DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES
AND LETTERS OF CREDIT AS ORIGINAL MARGIN8)

(Asterisks indicate additions; brackets indicate deletions.)

Rule 4.01. CUSTOMER'S MARGINS

(A) Initial margin at least equal to the level set for customers shall be
required of all customers. In no case shall a customer's initial margin be
less than a specified amount per contract, or a specified percentage of the
market value at which any commodity is bought or sold, such customer's margin
to be determined and announced by the Board of Directors or its designee.

 (B) Once the required initial margin has been deposited for each individual
transaction, such trade and such margin shall, for the purposes of this rule,
lose their individual identity and be commingled with all other trades and
margins in the same commodity for the same customer account.

 (C) When the margin (Net Liquidating Value plus Non-Cash Deposits) in a
customer's account declines below the maintenance margin requirement
applicable to the open positions carried in such account, the Member Firm
carrying said account is required to collect (call) from the customer such
funds, which when deposited, will restore it to the then prevailing initial
margin requirement.

 (D) A Member Firm shall not accept orders for new trades on behalf of an
undermargined customer account other than those which reduce its initial
margin requirement unless such Member Firm has been given assurances by said
customer that funds sufficient to restore the account to its then prevailing
initial margin requirement are forthcoming and will be received in a
reasonable amount of time not to exceed one business day for Floor Members
and three business days for all other customers.

(E)(1) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open NYMEX Division positions:

 (a) United States Currency; or any currency freely convertible to United
States currency; provided that if foreign currency is deposited, its value
shall be calculated so that at the current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar
equivalent of the foreign currency satisfies the customer's margin obligation.

 (b) securities issued by the Department of the Treasury of the United States
maturing within ten (10) years of the date of the deposit and guaranteed as
to principal and interest by the United States Government. Such securities
shall be valued at ninety five percent (95%) of par value.

*(c) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(d) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.

(e) deliverable warehouse receipts for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity.*

[(c)] *(f)* The net liquidating value in a customer's account over the
initial margin requirements for the positions carried for such account.

(2) A Member Firm may accept deposits from its customers in one or more of
the following forms as margin to cover open COMEX Division positions:

(a) United States currency, checks payable in United States currency, or
currency freely convertible to United States currency; provided that if
foreign currency is deposited, its value shall be calculated so that at the
current rate of exchange the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency
satisfies the customer's margin obligations;

(b) the net liquidating value in a customer's account over the initial margin
requirements for the positions carried for such account;

(c) securities issued or guaranteed by the United States, provided that such
securities shall be valued at the lower of the par or market value thereof;

(d) securities which are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. or the American Stock Exchange, Inc., or which are traded in the
over-the-counter market approved for margin by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve Board provided that such securities; (i) are free from liens
and encumbrances; (ii) represent no more than 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of any one issuer; and (iii) are valued at 75% of the
market value thereof;

(e) *deliverable* warehouse receipts *for commodities traded on the Exchange
provided that such receipts will be valued as margin at no more than 75% of
the value of the commodity*; [provided that such warehouse receipts shall be
valued in accordance with the following:

(i) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the commodity
underlying either the futures contract sold or the futures contract which is
the subject of the call options sold, not more than 90% of the value of the
commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(ii) if the warehouse receipt is for a deliverable grade of the futures
contract purchased or the put options sold, not more than 75% of the value of
the commodity may be considered as margin; and;

(iii) if the warehouse receipt is for either: (A) deliverable grade of a
commodity other than the commodity underlying the futures contract or option
to be margined; or (B) a form of silver or gold not deliverable under a
futures contract, then not more than 75% of the value of the warehouse
receipt may be considered as margin.]

(f) physical commodities (but not forward contracts therefor) if the carrying
member is in possession and control of negotiable documents covering such
commodities, provided, however, that the value of such commodities shall be
based upon the contract market price for the grade of such commodity or if
the commodity is not of a grade deliverable on a contract market, then at the
price for the grade of such commodity on the spot market;

(g) a letter of credit in favor of a clearing member carrying an account*, or
in the case of any letter or credit to be used on a pass-through basis with
the Clearing House a letter of credit in favor of the Exchange.  All letters
of credit shall be* issued in such form as may be prescribed by the Exchange
and by a depository which has been approved by the Exchange for issuance and
confirmation of letters of credit drawn in favor of the Clearing Members *or
in favor of the Exchange, as applicable.*

 (3) Calls issued by Member Firms for additional margin from customers may
only be met by: deposits conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.01(E)(1)
for open NYMEX Division positions, or conforming to the requirements of Rule
4.01(E)(2) for open COMEX Division positions, or, for open positions on
either division of the Exchange, favorable market movements which, when taken
into consideration and combined with any other monies available, enable the
customer's margin to equal or exceed the then prevailing initial margin
requirement.

 (F) Withdrawals of margin from a customer's account may only be permitted by
a Member Firm carrying such account if the remaining funds in such account
are equal to or in excess of the then prevailing initial margin required of
the applicable open positions at the time of said withdrawal request.

(G) The customer's response to a margin call issued by a Member Firm must be
timely and complete. A Member Firm may call, at any time, for margins above
and beyond the minimums required by the Exchange. A Member Firm may liquidate
any or all positions maintained by a customer for failure to meet a margin
call. The customer will be liable for any loss or deficiency resulting
therefrom.

 (H) The margin requirements established by the Board or its designee may
vary for different commodities and may be changed from time to time by the
Board or its designee, and in the discretion of the Board or its designee,
may be made applicable to all open trades as well as new trades.

 (I) Arbitrage

(1) For the purposes of Exchange margin requirements, an arbitrage position
is a purchase or sale of an Exchange futures contract in one delivery month
which futures contract is offset by a futures contract to sell or to purchase
a similar quantity of a related commodity in the same or different delivery
month which offsetting futures contract is executed on or subject to the
rules of a different exchange. In order to qualify as an arbitrage position,
each contract long and short must be carried by the same member firm for the
same account.

(2) The Board of Directors, by resolution, may identify those futures
contracts, that are executable on and/or subject to the rules of a different
exchange, which shall be deemed to qualify as part of an arbitrage position.

(3) The Board of Directors or its designee may set levels of margin for
arbitrage positions at a rate less than applicable to outright positions;
provided, however, that except for interdivision straddles, no such rate
shall be lower than the rates established for clearing members' margins.

Rule 9.05. MARGINS

* * * *
(E) Clearing Members may meet original margin calls by depositing:

(1) Cash (U.S. Currency);

(2) Original Margin Certificates issued by an original margin depository, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, for delivery to the order of the
Clearing House, representing securities issued by the Department of Treasury
of the United States of America maturing within ten (10) years from the date
of the deposit and guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United
States Government; such securities shall be valued at ninety five percent
(95%) of the par value; or

(3) Subject to a maximum limit of 50% of the Clearing Member's total original
margin obligations, Irrevocable Letters of Credit payable to the order of the
Clearing House *including such Letters of Credit that are deposited with the
Clearing Member in accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, in
form acceptable to the Clearing House, issued by or confirmed by an original
margin depository and having an expiration date of not less than three (3) or
more than eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance; provided, however,
that such Letter of Credit may not be used to meet original margin
obligations during the fifteen calendar days prior to the expiration date
thereof (if the fifteenth day prior to the expiration of the Letter of Credit
is not a business day, the period during which such Letter of Credit may not
be used to meet original margin obligations shall begin on the business day
immediately preceding that day); and, provided further, that on the business
d!
ay!
 preceding the fifteenth calendar day prior to the expiration of the Letter
of Credit, the Clearing House shall issue a call for original margin to be
deposited in a form and manner acceptable to the Clearing House for positions
held open as of the close of business on that day and margined by the Letter
of Credit. The Clearing House shall have the unqualified right to call on any
Letter of Credit at any time prior to expiration.

CCA Rule 48. DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT A ORIGINAL MARGIN

* * * *
(b) Irrevocable Letters of Credit.

(i) The Corporation will accept as original margin for the full face amount
thereof a letter of credit in favor of the Corporation issued by any
institution selected by the depositor *including such Letters of Credit in
favor of the Corporation that are deposited with the Clearing Member in
accordance with Exchange procedures by a customer*, provided that

(A) such  institution has been approved by the Board as an approved
depository or such institution is organized under the laws of the United
States or the laws of any state and the letter of credit issued by such
institution has been confirmed by an approved depository;
(B) that the aggregate amount of letters of credit which may be accepted at
any time from any one approved depository, or for the account of any one
Clearing Member may be limited by the Board from time to time;
(C) that a letter of credit issued on behalf of a Clearing Member by an
institution which is an affiliated firm of such Clearing Member must be
confirmed by an institution which is not an affiliated firm of such Clearing
Member; and
(D) such letter of credit shall be in form and substance approved by the
Board and shall be in such denominations as may be determined by the Board
from time to time; shall be irrevocable, shall be available to be drawn upon
by the Corporation by  a clean sight draft(s) or written demand(s) and shall
run for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of issue.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-147)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Please follow up on NY Elec & Gas because they'll never call back.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/28/99 08:22
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Marcy A Youngerman                           05/28/99 07:54 AM

To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Public Service Electric and Gas Company

After the holiday weekend, please make a note on your calendars to follow up
with these guys.  Thanks in advance.

Have a great wknd.  We're supposed to get some nice summer weather up here
straight thru.
Marcy

Susan Flynn
05/27/99 03:59 PM
To: Marcy A Youngerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Public Service Electric and Gas Company

   Re captioned subject:   Adele Raspe (attorney) has not yet returned the
call I put into her earlier this week,

Re NY Elec & Gas Corp.   - Sara is waiting to hear from them re: threshold.
She last spoke to them on 5/13/99.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sokolov, Jason
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: FW: Returned mail: User unknown

-----Original Message-----
From: Rzipter@aol.com [mailto:Rzipter@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Sokolov, Jason
Subject: Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown

Jason --

can you forward my message to vince?

Thanks,

Rudi

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <MAILER-DAEMON@aol.com>
To: Rzipter@aol.com
Date: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:58:51 GMT
Subject:

The original message was received at Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:58:47 -0500 (EST)
from root@localhost

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<vince.kaminski@enron.com>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailman.enron.com.:
>>> RCPT To:<vince.kaminski@enron.com>
<<< 550 5.1.1 <vince.kaminski@enron.com>... User unknown
550 <vince.kaminski@enron.com>... User unknown

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <Rzipter@aol.com>
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: Monday, January 14, 2002 4:58:47 GMT
Subject:

Vince,

I hope all is well with you considering ...

Our baby, Addison Sterling, was born on Saturday, January 12th at 12:31 PM.  She was fairly big - 8 lbs 14 ozs and she is 20 inches long.  I've attached a link to the hospital's webite that has her picture (she is much cuter in person, of course :)

We named her after Addison St which runs by Wrigley Field (Home of the Chicago Cubs) and the Pound Sterling.

Cami is doing well and we have returned home on Sunday night.

http://web.mhhs.org/nursery/babyDetails.asp?hospitalID=7&search=list&babyID=19650

RZ


Please CC Stacey neuweiler and Ami Chokshi on any wellhead changes. Thanks.

D

Tom Acton@ENRON
03/08/2000 11:48 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Well Heads

Daren, EOG  called and said that the well behind 986296 which has been down
for a week from 7100 to 4400 for the last week or so needs to stay at the
4400  for the rest of the month.  I  changed the ticket for that.  This was
per Suzanne Saldivar.  Also Shoreline reduced the meter 6722 from 30 to 24.
also changed that. last Cody went from 7666 to 7600 at meter 6722.  Both
Shoreline and Cody were per customer request.


(See attached file: hpl0901.xls)

 - hpl0901.xls


Matt,

Two quick questions that Doug Leach needs answered ASAP to get the oil ordered:

1)  Name and number of contact person for handling the accounting/paperwork type issues at HD King plant.

2)  Name and number of contact person for logistic/scheduling issues at HD King plant.

Thanks,

Charlie


We're baaaaaack!? Here is an idea for this  upcoming week.? You'll probably
want to spend some time catching up with  you kids as well.? Have fun!
?
Bobby
 - NEON Opening Lesson.doc


Ketan,
I do not know who Mike spoke to at Morgan Stanley.  Do you agree that this is
a statement that Morgan, Stanley would make?  Would you please run the traps
at Morgan to confirm but do not provide any info to Trading Edge until
confirmed by me after I have received notification from Enron Legal that they
are okay with this approach.  Ketan, Mike Fowler will send you, Sara and I
the name of whom he spoke with.
Thanks. Sheila

Sara,
What do you think?

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 05:26
PM ---------------------------

Mike Fowler@ENRON
11/17/2000 05:07 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trading Edge

As you are aware, Jeff Kinneman would like to establish agreements for ENA
and ECT Investments to begin online bond trading with Buy Side Direct and
Trading Edge.  Given that we will not provide 1) financial statements for ENA
and ECT Investments, or 2) a guarantee from Enron Corp., Trading Edge has
requested information from our prime broker Morgan Stanley in order to
determine a limit for our Trading Edge activity.

We intend to ask Trading Edge to establish a $25 million daily trading limit
for our activity. Based on a discussion with Trading Edge, it appears that
they would accept a qualitative statement from Morgan Stanley that this is
not excessive based on our relationship with Morgan Stanley.  Our account rep
informed me that Enron has approximately $400 million of equity under
management with Morgan Stanley.  Jeff prefers not to provide specific trading
statistics to Trading Edge, but would be comfortable with having Morgan
Stanley state that our holdings are well in excess of the proposed daily
trading limit.  In addition, Morgan Stanley referred to a letter of good
standing that they could provide on our behalf to Trading Edge.

Our Morgan Stanley rep wanted to ensure that any request for information be
approved by your area.  Who from your area should I work with on this matter ?

Please let me know if you would like to discuss.  Thanks.

Mike
x39990


From: 	Choate, Heather
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:51 AM
Cc:	Bates, Kimberly; Hogan, Irena D.; Villarreal, Alex; Rangel, Ina; Vuittonet, Laura; Jackson, Brandee; Saldana, Alex; Superty, Robert; Hall, Bob M; Presas, Jessica; Quezada, Daniel; Showers, Digna; Greif, Donna; Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Calcagno, Suzanne; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Jaquet, Tammy; Young, Becky
Subject:	Logistics Commercial Realignment

After a careful review of the wholesale and retail gas trading and scheduling process it has been decided that the Gas Logistics teams should report directly into the Enron America's Commercial organization. This realignment will help to strengthen the commercial focus and communication between the trading desks and the schedulers and will play a critical role as Enron tries to maximize opportunities and maintain a competitive trading edge. The details are as follows:

Wholesale

Bob Superty will maintain his management of the Logistics support functions which include the Transport Rate team (Kim Olinger), Electronic Commerce team (Tammy Lee-Jaquet) and Regulatory Affairs teams (Suzanne Calcagno). In addition, Bob will now manage the Northeast Logistics team as part of the East desk. Bob will report directly to Scott Neal and will also help coordinate the Logistics function across all regions working closely with each of the regional Logistics Managers, Commercial desk heads and Enron Americas senior management team.

Victor LaMadrid will manage the Southeast Logistics team and will report directly to Scott Neal. Victor's knowledge and overall east desk experience will be critical to help  maximize east desk opportunities and promote new initiatives across all regions.

Lisa Kinsey will manage the Central Logistics team and will report directly to Hunter Shively.

Patti Sullivan will manage the West Logistics team and will report directly to Mike Grigsby.

Darren Farmer will manage the Texas Logistics team and will report directly to Tom Martin

George Smith will manage the Well Head Logistics team and will report directly to Fred Lagrasta.

Retail

Donna Greif will now report directly to Don Black. Each of the regional Logistics Managers (East - Marde Driscoll-Ernest, Central - Charlie Muzzy, West - Sabra Dinari) will continue to report directly to Donna. Donna will continue her ongoing efforts in the development and integration of the new retail trading systems, prior period adjustments and development of a strong and talented Logistics team.

Congratulations to all involved and welcome to the commercial gas team - John Lavorato, President and CEO, Enron Americas.
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Assistants - Please forward on to your groups.


Since this was a fix to a Doorstep finding, how do we react?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT on 16/11/2000
17:25 ---------------------------

	From:  Scott Mills                           14/11/2000 13:46

To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Julie Ramos/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Feldman/SA/Enron@Enron, Xochitl
Figueroa/NA/Enron@Enron, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Lavarato has stopped efforts for implementing Enpower in South America until
business activity increases enough to support it.

Based on below, we will start looking for someone with strong Access/Excel
knowledge to come up with a different solution.  Everyone will have to
regroup and determine next steps and look at revised timelines.

SRM (x33548)
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Mills/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/14/2000 01:31 PM

To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

FYI...

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 01:12
PM ---------------------------
Beth Perlman @ ECT   11/14/2000 11:53 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

I discussed this with John Lavorato who is now responsible for this.  He said
don't do anything!  When their  volumes increase we can address the Enpower
implementation again.

Beth

	Richard Burchfield
	11/08/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Steve,
 Come by my office to discuss.

Richard

	Enron Technology

	From:  Steve Nat @ ENRON                           11/08/2000 08:07 AM

To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Richard / Beth,  We have been asked by risk to get Argentina started on
EnPower.  Are you OK with us moving on this?  A couple things to consider...

Our instance strategy for EnPower is determined by geographic location
(bandwidth), volumes, and market similarity (functionality).  Based on this,
I want to set South America up on their own instance.  EnPower will have the
following instances long term:  EUR, US, CND, SA, AUS, JPN, IND.  We will
continue to pursue a common code base and logical data model.

There is additional time and cost associated with setting up a new instance,
however, I am concerned about continuing to pile new business units into a
production environment that will eventually need to be split.

Glad to discuss...  Please respond quickly, as we are waiting to pull the
trigger on this...

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Nat/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 07:32
AM ---------------------------
From: Duong Luu@ECT on 11/07/2000 01:06 PM
To: Steve Nat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

fyi

----- Forwarded by Duong Luu/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 01:05 PM -----

	Trang Le
	11/07/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EnPower production - Argentina Power

Duong,
Per our phone conversation, below is the list of people that would need
access to EnPower production.

User Names:   NT ID:  Extension:
Scott Mills   SMills  x3-3548
Martha Stevens  MSteven x3-4742
Sarah Smith   SSmith  x3-0997
Juana Fayette  JFayett  x3-0992
Jana Morse  JMorse  x6-8265
Trang Le  TLe1  x3-6996

Currently, the Argentine Power group has in total about 20 physical forward
deals  which will be done under Enron Comercializadora De Energia Argentina
S.A.(Co. 027W) and one financial deal which will be done under Enron North
America (Co. 0364). Given the fact that we'll also have deals on ENA, I would
think that we could be on the Houston server. Just let us know.
In the mean time, we'll be working with the various Global groups to have the
proper desk, portfolio, facilities etc.... set up.

Thanks for your help,
Trang x3-6996


Attached please find the most recent guidelines for confirming swap
transactions with RMT.  Please distribute this memorandum to others involved
in the confirmation process, as appropriate, and feel free to call me at
X34718 if you have any questions or comments.

Regards.
Rhett Jackson


To:	NERC Roster
	Standards
	Operating Manual
	System Operator Training

You are invited to participate in one of three workshops designed to
solicit input into training
issues which will help NERC understand what operating and marketing
personnel feel they need in
the way of training programs and study materials.

Attached is the announcement and registration form. The announcement is
also posted at the
following NERC web site: http://www.nerc.com/~filez/workshops.html

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Glenda Rodriguez


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 11:07
AM ---------------------------

"Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com> on 04/04/2000 10:30:48 AM
To: alan.janna@enron.com
cc: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com, joana.ryan@enron.com, rgay@enron.com,
roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, MTHURBER@mail5.allegro.net
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement

Alan,

In response to your e-mail, the Letter Agreement has not been further revised
since I sent it to you on March 30th (that e-mail is attached hereto).

The open issues relate to the following items in Attachment 8 which contains
certain provisions to be used as part of the "Base Agreement:"

1.  The issue detailed in the attached of whether WestLB will indemnify GEII
against actions of the Enron entity acting as "Agent."  Rob Gay is reviewing
this issue.  This issue would impact Section 20.1(a).

2.  The inclusion of certain language that Enron has requested which would
more clearly establish that GEII's indemnity obligation includes
consequential damage claims by third parties.  The language at issue appears
in Sections 20.1(b) and 27.2.

At Brett Wiggs' request, Cheryl Costa is discussing the above issues with
GEII.  If you have any questions or comments or would like to discuss the
foregoing, please contact me at 713-655-5102.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:16:35 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com>
Cc: MTHURBER@skadden.com
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_EEB7315F.5938C8D4"

As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com>
Cc: MTHURBER@skadden.com
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_EEB7315F.5839C9D5"

Rob,

Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement.  Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.

As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent).  West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement.  Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.

GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB.  In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly.  I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter.  If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

Thanks,
Vanessa.

 - 32581_7.doc
 - 32573_7.doc
 - 32614_2.xls


Linda Helper
1072 Trestle Glen Rd
Oakland, CA 94610
lhelper@wafs.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Linda Helper


Thank you for looking into this for me.  Can you tell me for what day the variance in December is for?  Also, when do you expect to have January resolved?

Diana

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:18 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	SCL

Diana-

  I'll have a more definite answer tomorrow, but for now, it looks like we're current with SCL except for a variance of approx $1000 for January 2001 and $7000 for December 2000.  Hiope this helps for now.

  Virginia


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 12:00
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Jennifer Bowles" <jkbowles@hotmail.com>
03/27/2000 11:24 AM

To: tgiddens@exchange.ml.com, bmoss@exchange.ml.com, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com,
merharp@hotmail.com, sscott5@enron.com, Will_Nolen@enron.net,
Sbuck5151@aol.com, edrington@uthscsa.edu, emily.boon@msdw.com,
jcja@Dynegy.com, PsalmNo131@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Wisdom

Disclaimer:  I do not like forwards.

Grandma sent this to me today and I thought it was good advice for "us
kids"... have a great day.

Love,

Jen

>
>Wisdom:
>
>We convince ourselves that life will be better after we get married, have
>a
>baby, then another.  Then we are frustrated that the kids aren't old
>enough
>and we'll be more content when they are.  After that, we're frustrated
>that
>we have teenagers to deal with.  We will certainly be happy when they are
>out of that stage.  We tell ourselves that our life will be complete when
>our spouse gets his or her act together, when we get a nicer car, are
>able
>to go on a nice vacation, when we retire.
>
>The truth is, there's no better time to be happy than right now.  If not
>now, when? Your life will always be filled with challenges.  It's best to
>admit this to yourself and decide to be happy anyway.  One of my favorite
>quotes comes from Alfred D. Souza.  He said, "For a long time it had
>seemed
>to me that life was about to begin - real life. But there was always some
>obstacle in the way, something to be gotten through first, some
>unfinished
>business, time still to be served, or a debt to be paid.  Then life would
>begin.  At last it dawned on me that these obstacles WERE my "life."
>
>This perspective has helped me to see that there is no way to happiness.
>Happiness is the way.  So, treasure every moment that you have and
>treasure
>it more because you shared it with someone special, special enough to
>spend
>your time with...and remember that time waits for no one.
>
>So, stop waiting until you finish school, until you go back to school,
>until
>you lose ten pounds, until you gain ten pounds, until you have kids,
>until
>your kids leave the house, until you start work, until you retire, until
>you
>get married, until Friday night, until Sunday morning, until you get a
>new
>car or home, until your car or home is paid off, until Spring, until
>Summe
>until Fall, until Winter, until you are off welfare, until the first or
>fifteenth,
>until your song comes on to decide that there is no better time than
>right
>now to be happy.  Happiness is a journey, not a destination.
>
>(author unknown)
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to Temple_List-unsubscribe@listbot.com
>Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Hi Mark -

Could you provide a quick update on the status regarding the Subject of
whether the GTC's should continue to be attached to the Houston EOL
confirmations?  If you would prefer, I can also arrange to discuss this in
your office.  Please advise.

Thanks  -

Rob
x 35491

Subject:  "The Legal Group in London (Justin Boyd) has advised that office
that it would be OK to stop sending GTC's with confirms.  The London
documentation teams in London have been advised to include the following
language on their EnronOnline transactions that are governed under GTC's (not
governed by Master Agreements):

"This Transaction is governed by the EnronOnline General Terms and Conditions
(GTC) that you have accepted via EnronOnline. For a copy of this GTC, please
click on the Product Description on the EnronOnline website and choose "View
GTC".

Please advise if this policy may be applied to the EnronOnline transactions
for the Houston office. "


Tim:  I think this is Rob's new email address.

Best,
Jeff


Yea, problem is I left at noon to catch my flight, but Marc had a later
flight because NY is closer to Columbus than here. Right after I left, the
market got very busy and Marc decided to stay at work and not go.  So that
sucked.

Jennifer Burns

10/12/2000 04:09 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

I think I would be a little disappointed after traveling so far.......I guess
it was nice to see your "buddies".

John Arnold
10/12/2000 04:06 PM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Sounds as if you went to a better show than I did.  The game was very
sloppy.  They tied 0-0.  Not too exciting.

Jennifer Burns

10/12/2000 03:43 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Well......IT WAS GREAT!!!!!! Live was actually better than Counting Crows
(Shocking).  How was the Soccer Game?  I owe you dinner.  Thanks again for
the tickets.

John Arnold
10/12/2000 03:38 PM
To: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

how was the concert?


I  think you ought to do a bit of hand holding to help Randy complete this.
For example, we know the type of derivative, the specific investment type and
a lot of the other information called for by the form. I really think you'll
spend less time working on this if you sit down with Randy and help him
prepare the form. Also, Randy needs some guidance on what sort of description
of the underlying investment is appropriate. I'm sure Randy can attach
something in his file that works just fine (as opposed to preparing something
for this). Also, you and Randy need to discuss how the fairness opinion is
used and whether it's provided to LJM to help support the swap price. Thanks!

Gordon McKillop@ENRON
09/26/2000 09:36 AM
To: Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

To follow up on Scott's message below.  The attached proposal sheet has the
entity information for the Raptor II structure.  The proposal sheet should
contain the information that is necessary to support the confirm.  The asset
description should describe the business or entity.  A specific description
of the underlying investment and interest in should also be included.  Under
the detail of the derivative include the type (at the money price return
swap, put, call...), term, legal name, specific investment type (type of
stock, warrant ...), initial price, initial shares, initial notional value.
The valuation support should be attached with the proposal sheet.  For this
transaction, there is no premium calculation since the swap is at the money.

Please provide this information to Sara and me.  I will distribute the
information to Ryan and Scott.  After the confirm is completed, I will submit
the information to the counterparty for approval.

Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Gordon

Scott Sefton@ECT
09/26/2000 08:37 AM
To: Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Randy,

Hedges in the Raptor structure require that a Proposal Sheet be submitted to
the counterparty to the swap (the counterparty is owned by an outside
investor and our agreement with them requires this). Attached to Mary's email
below is the Raptor Derivative Proposal Sheet that the business unit will
need to submit. Gordon is responsible for this process and can answer any
questions you have.

Also attached below is a Raptor Securities/Confidentiality Response Form that
ENA legal prepared to help them conduct a due diligence exercise on their
merchant assets being hedged to confirm that there were no contractual or
other legal restrictions that may affect their ability to enter into the
swap. Although  many of the items on this form won't be relevant to what
you're hedging, I thought it may be helpful. Because we're not familiar with
the assets or any South American legal issues that may apply, we'll be
looking to you for confirmation that there aren't any issues in this regard.

You can ignore the document entitled Raptor Process for Inclusion of Swaps
into Raptor Vehicles.

Please call me or Gordon if you have any questions. Thanks!

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 06:38 PM
To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

We can discuss tomorrow, but the swap group is not staffed either to fulfill
the coordination of all the work in respect of the underlying assets.  Do you
have alternative ideas?

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Scott Sefton
	09/25/2000 06:34 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Although I'm happy to discuss this at our meeting tomorrow, I don't think the
draft process document describes a role for Global Finance legal that we can
properly fulfill.

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 02:14 PM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

See attached for your review prior to meeting, Tuesday 9:30 38C1.  Thanks.
Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Gerald,

Attached is a revised version of the Sandia-Enron Assignment which reflects
suggested changes from our corporate counsel.  You will note that they are
minor in nature, except for a correction to the Seller's Deficiency Quantity
definition, which was improperly stated in earlier versions.

If these proposed changes meet with your approval, please prepare originals
of each document for signature by the parties.  I would remind you that you
will need to make one change in the recitals of the Amendment relating to
PSCo contract 124389, as the contract date on that Agreement is November 1,
1993.  Once we have received corrected Originals, I will obtain execution on
behalf of Public Service Company of Colorado.

Thank you for your consideration.  Should you have questions, you may reach
me at (303) 308-6172.

Alan Bransgrove
Manager, Contract Administration

 <<Sandia-Enron Assignment 12-12 revisions to 124620B(red).doc>>

 - Sandia-Enron Assignment 12-12 revisions to 124620B(red).doc


Please note that the below-listed WAPA offices, which have previously been
known under several names in our global counterparty database, will now be
known as the names in red.

WAPA-Colorado River Storage Project Manangement Center (CRSP)  (This office
is in Salt Lake City and was formerly known as Salt Lake City Area or Upper
Colorado)

WAPA-Desert Southwest Region (This office is in Phoenix and was formerly know
as Phoenix Area, or Lower Colorado)

WAPA-Rocky Mountain Region  (This office is in Loveland, Colorado and was
formerly known as Loveland Area, Loveland-Fort Collins Area, and Lower
Missouri)

WAPA-Upper Great Plains Region (This office is in Billings, MT, and was
formerly known as Billings Area, Upper Missouri, and Pick-Sloan Missouri)


Your GTSA Exhibit 0202LCG045 with Pacific Gas and Electric Company is now available in INSIDEtracc.  If you have any questions prior to confirming* this exhibit, please call a California Gas Transmission Representative (http://www.pge.com/pipeline/custserv/reps.html).

Steps to E-Confirm your GTSA Exhibit:

1.	At the Pipe Ranger Home page (http://www.pge.com/pipeline/index.html), log on to INSIDEtracc.  You will be prompted to enter your ID and password at two different log on screens.
2.	At the INSIDEtracc main window, select Navigate, Contracts, Contracts.  Click the Retrieve button to retrieve your customer-specific contract information.
3.	Click the arrow next to the GTSA Contract Code to open up a list of Exhibit types (e.g. Transportation, Storage, Park/Lend).
4.	Click the arrow next to the appropriate Exhibit type for a list of Exhibits.
5.	Select the desired Exhibit from this list (single-click) or open the Exhibit by double-clicking on it.
6.	Click the "View Contract" button on the Contract Controller screen, or "View Exhibit" button on the Exhibit screen to review the full text of the Exhibit.
7.	Click the "E-Confirm" button when you are ready to electronically confirm your Exhibit.
8.	Click the "View Contract" or "View Exhibit" button after you E-Confirm the Exhibit.  Print or save the Exhibit text with the Date/Time/User ID stamp of your E-Confirmation.

* As a "contact" identified on Exhibit B (Access Request Form), you are authorized to confirm contracts under the Electronic Commerce System User Agreement executed with Pacific Gas and Electric Company.  If you are not a "contact" identified on Exhibit B, please call a CGT representative to let them know you received this e-mail in error.


Andrew,

I forgot a name.  Also, as Kam pointed out below, can we make sure that the set-up users have access to the web page as well.

Errol McLaughlin (emclaug)

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:06 AM
To:	Valdes, John
Subject:	RE: RiscTrac Users

Does he know to set up us as web users also?  Can you add Errol to the first list?

KK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Valdes, John
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:03 AM
To:	Champion, Andrew
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RiscTrac Users

Andrew,

The setup users for Risktrac are as follows

Jeff Gosset(jgosset)
Kam Keiser(kkeiser)
John Valdes(jvaldes
Stephen Perich(sperich)
Michael Castillo(mcastil)
Russ Severson(rsevers)
Phillip Love(plove)
Darron Giron(dgiron)
Scott Palmer(spalmer)
O'neal Winfree(owinfre)

Web Users are as follows

Monte Jones (mjones7)
Ashley Worthing (aworthin)
Kristen Clause (kclause)
Ryan O'Rourke (rorourke)
Melissa Videtto (mvidetto)
James Hungerford (jhungerf)
Randy Bhatia (rbhatia)
Matt Olney (molney)
Bruce Mills (bmills)
Kori Loibl (kloibl)
Joey Taylor (jtaylor1)
Brad Jones (bjones7)
Laura Vargas (lvargas2)
Derek Bailey (dbailey)

Thanks for your help.

John Valdes


Please wire $235,840,000 Cdn on Friday Sept 22 to:

Balancing Pool
Toronto Dominion Bank
Transit:  80609-004
Account:  349820

Also please wire $58,960,000 Cdn to Enron Canada Corp. as per the wire
instructions in the attached file.

Please call me tomorrow at (403) 974 -6728 to confirm that the money has left
your account.
---------------------- Forwarded by Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT on 09/21/2000 09:07
AM ---------------------------

Soma Ghosh
09/20/2000 10:15 AM
To: "Fleming, Blair " <BLAIR.FLEMING@ROYALBANK.COM>, "Ellison, Mike"
<Mike.Ellison@rbcds.com>, "McArthur, Ian " <IAN.MCARTHUR@ROYALBANK.COM>
cc: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Robin Veariel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Please would you please provide a name within RBC for our Treasury group to
contact re. transfer of funds.

The full amount will be C$294,800,000 (interest rate swap cashflows will
require re-adjustment, Mike E has asked that these be forwarded to Tracy-RBC
internal Legal for interest rate schedule)

We would like C$235,840,000 to be transferred directly to Govt of Alberta on
behalf of Enron Canada Power
C$58,960,000 to Enron Canada.

Full detailed instructions will be provided by Laura Scott tel: 403 974 6728

As discussed with Mike, the interst rate swap will be fixed Thursday
afternoon, & funds transferred early on Friday 22

Regards,

Soma


Start Date: 10/4/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100419.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Chris,

Will this be a problem?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/08/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/08/2000 11:42 AM

To: joann_collins@enron.com
cc: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Doug
Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Redirection of Coh Gas

Hi Joann.

Effective March 9th - 31st, please redirect 50 dth per day from COH 7-3 to
Penn
Fuel 8-36.  Please advise of the contract number.  Thank you.


Keep in mind that there will be 3 Davis appointees come the first of the
year.  Right now the Wilson, Republican commissioners, still hold a 3-2
majority on the Commission.

	Mona L Petrochko
	11/13/2000 11:40 AM

		 To: Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES, John
Woodman/SFO/EES@EES, Ronald G Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Brian
Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg
Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Persson/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Jeanette Reese/HOU/EES@EES,
Greg Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES, Peter Vint/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Juden/HOU/EES@EES,
Melinda Winn/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Lyle
White/HOU/EES@EES, Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Suzanne Farrow/HOU/EES@EES,
Rami Vij/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Natalie
Bondareva/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Kimble/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Peters/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Huang/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Roger Yang, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Fwd: DJ - Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators

FYI.  Indicates that the CPUC is unlikely to order refunds, but also
tentative about recouping high costs from ratepayers.  Utilities are "upping
the ante" by filing in Federal Court and showing fiscal implications.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/13/2000
11:36 AM ---------------------------

Mary Hain@ECT
11/10/2000 06:00 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Richard Sanders,
mday@gmssr.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
steve.c.hall@enron.com, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart
Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dennis Benevides, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Murray P
O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Aamodt@Gateway, Jay Dudley, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Fwd: DJ - Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators

Please forward this to anyone I have forgotten.  Thanks.

DJ Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

(This article was originally published Thursday)

     LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Public Utilities Commission
likely won't order generators to refund billions of dollars in windfall
profits from last summer's wholesale power price spikes to utilities and
customers, commissioners told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.

     A Republican commissioner said the PUC knows generators are manipulating
the wholesale power market in California but the commission doesn't have the
"expertise in-house to figure out who it is and how it's being done."

     "Even if we could force refunds, it would take five to 10 years in court
to decide if generators should refund money," the commissioner said. "I don't
think the state is willing to spend the money or the time."

     In addition, the commission is nowhere near deciding whether Edison
International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit
Pacific Gas & Electric can pass on a combined $5 billion in debt to their
ratepayers, the commissioner said.

     A decision won't likely be made until mid-2001, the commissioner added.

     Only PUC President Loretta Lynch and Commissioner Carl Wood support
having generators refund windfall profits to utilities and ratepayers. The
commission's investigation, one of two ongoing probes into the state's
troubled wholesale power market, has been unsuccessful in finding evidence
that would force generators to refund billions of dollars, according to
documents obtained Thursday by Dow Jones Newswires.

     Last week, federal regulators determined generators didn't manipulate
the market. But they did find flaws in the state's market structure and said
rates were "unjust and unreasonable."

     The state's Independent System Operator and Power Exchange have also
concluded they have no evidence to prove generators manipulated the market in
order to drive up wholesale power prices.

     The commissioner said the PUC doesn't support the utilities' efforts to
pass on $5 billion in wholesale power costs to ratepayers.

     The commissioner said "if it came down to deciding tomorrow, the
utilities would be left holding the bag."

     PG&E and SoCal Edison pay about 16 cents a kilowatt-hour for wholesale
power. But the utilities charge their customers far less under a
state-mandated rate freeze.

     As reported earlier Thursday, SoCal Edison President and Chief Executive
Officer Stephen Frank said the utility's inability to immediately recover
more than $2 billion in debt from its ratepayers may force the company to lay
off employees and reduce major capital spending.

     PG&E filed a lawsuit in federal court Wednesday asking a judge to allow
the utility to pass on $3 billion in debt to its customers.

     -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com
     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 10-11-00


thanks - I await the next update

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Port, David; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	9:30 run  -  Rafferty Update

Our little Rafferty was very pleased to see her mum and Personal Trainer Rita.

She was calm and sleepy and did lots of stretches and she stood still when we put her collar and leash on - gooood girl! No mess in her kennel either.

She did not go potty, but we had a good walk about. It's cool and shady up there - no problem with the temp.

She got an extra nice treat for being a good girl going back in her kennel - no cries - she's the best.


I have a 1:10 meeting so I can't attend your marketing meeting.  I thought it
might be a good idea to grab Lambie at noon and get him to attend your whole
meeting.  He might have some insights into Alliance among other things.

Lavo


The attached spreadsheet allows you to easily calculate Eco's year-end LNG inventory for a variety of cases that vary dispatch rate, # days of outage for CT1, and number of cargoes diverted between now and year-end. Simply enter your assumption for number of days of CT1 outage in cell A16 and the number of cargoes you want to divert in cell A23. The year-end inventory is automatically calculated. A negative number means that you require more LNG than you are entitled to receive.

Assuming that you want the LNG tank full at year-end:

1. Eco will be able to receive 100% of the remaining 6 cargoes if the CT1 outage is 60 days or less

2. 175 days of CT1 outage are required to result in Eco being able to divert 1 cargo and still have a full tank at year-end

3. a 60-175 day outage for CT1 results in surplus LNG but whether or not it is enough to market depends on how much the outage exceeds 60 days

The above figures assume a 76% dispatch and 95% availability on days that Eco is not assumed to be in an outage.

Paul


Does that mean we will be taking the company plane???


Kate,

Please approve and auto route 483760,483758,483752,483755.

les


(See attached file: HPLN0324.xls)

 - HPLN0324.xls


I want to take a moment to thank each of you for having a summer Analyst or
Associate work on your team. I also want to remind everyone what a high
stakes activity this is for Enron.
Based on your recommendation, we will make offers at the end of the summer to
those interns who perform, and who you endorse as a potential future member
of your team. Those interns who have had a good experience and accept our
offer will be the lowest risk hires we make - from any source. We will have
effectively interviewed and watched them work for 2-3 months. They also have
the potential to be the most effective advocates and talent scouts we have,
when they return to campus. On the flip side, those who don't have meaningful
assignments, or have bad experiences during the summer can severely hurt our
efforts.
Thank you again for being part of this very important activity. If you have
any questions, or if areas of concern arise during the summer, please contact
Ted Bland (x35275), Traci Warner (x33242) or me (x36671).
We appreciate your contributions to this important effort for Enron.
Billy


Tana:

Can you please forward an NDA for Net Works and

UnBound Technologies, Inc.
5295 Hollister Road
Houston, Texas 77040

Voice: 832.590.1000
Fax: 832.590.1010
Email: info@unboundtech.com <mailto:info@unboundtech.com>

We are discussing applications and technology that we can develop and or
license from / to each other.

Thanks,

Fred Philipson
5-9323


---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 07:13 PM
---------------------------

Brian Hoskins
08/30/2000 10:04 AM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: for distribution

As part of an effort to facilitate communication on the trading floor, we
have set everyone up with Microsoft Messenger.
For those of you not familiar with the program, Microsoft Messenger allows
you to talk real time with anyone on your contact
list.  The program also has voice capabilities if you have a microphone.
Messenger should now be fully installed on your
computer and is accessible from the Start Menu.

You will need to set up a Hotmail account in order to use this service.
Please follow the link below to set up your account.
Once you have created an ID, please email me back with your ID so that I can
compile a contact list for everyone on the floor.
Let me know if you need help getting set up.

http://hotmail.com

A word of caution when using the program.  Because this is not behind the
company firewall, anything you send is not 100% secure and
could be intercepted by a third party.  Any sensitive pricing information
that you do not want disclosed should not be transmitted over
the program.


Here is her e-mail address.  Again, thanks so much for sending this e-mail.
margaret.dutton@bus.utexas.edu


Vince,

A reminder that I'm gone on Tuesday to Spearman.

Status of projects:

1.  Compound option for power structuring (Bernie, Edith Cross, Nick ?)
 Alex has finished the model.   Paulo has done some validation so we can
probably release it.
 This is will be used for an exotic book, so we may have to help with VAR
interface, etc.

2.  Followed up with Laine Borgman on DG contract.  We still need legal's
sign off.

3.  Left a message and email about Tom Barkley with Molly Magee and told Tom
that an offer would be coming by next week.


Folks:
Here are my edits.  For simplicity, I accepted all the other changes and put mine in strike-out-underline.

They are confined to the direct access section, and to the provisions regarding "spot market service" in particular.  Based on our negotiations, I think it's accurate to state that spot market service was never discussed as "an option to elect."  Instead, the language in the agreement states that it is a "backstop," in the event that on any given day a customer's ESP doesn't show up with the power.  In effect, it retains the utility's duty to serve, like the gas side, but does not expose the utility to any risk of cost recovery for the spot service provided.  I've also added provisions which obligate the utility to provide spot market service in the event that at the outset of the program (i.e., the transition date), the customer, for whatever reason fails to elect Term Service or Direct Access Service.  In both cases, the spot services lasts for a maximum of 30 days, after which the customer must choose Term or Direct Access Service.

Please take a look at the language.  While I haven't put any "stakes in the ground" up till now, I feel strongly about these changes (for reasons I'm happy to discuss), and if folks have issues with incorporating it into the document, I'd request that we have a very brief call to discuss.  I believe that the language as proposed captures my conversation with Dorothy.

In addition, I've also taken a stab at language requested by Delainey, i.e., "what to do about DA in the interm?"  There may be better ways to craft the language, but I took a shot nonetheless.

Finally, I'm assuming, based on yesterday's call, that, by delivering this document to the Speaker today, no one is giving their approval, support, or anything else for each and every provision.  I'm not prepared to, and cannot, do that at this time.

Thanks again to all for all the effort (and to Dorothy for her patience in hearing me out earlier).

Best,
Jeff


The deals should have been corrected in Sitara by now - if not please check
with Beverly.

                                                                     Thank
You!