FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
02:31 PM ---------------------------

"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 03/28/2000 09:47:58 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <vkamins@enron.com>
Subject:

Good morning Vince,

Sorry to have missed you at your office this morning.  Attached are today's
issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. Fixed Income Today - US treasuries, agencies, and corporates' analyses,
2. Financial Markets Today - FX majors and key bond markets' analyses.

How useful do you find our research?  Also, do you mind if contact your
colleagues directly to get their feedback?  That will save you time  from
forwarding this info to them daily.  Please let me know whom I may contact.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. + 1 212 571 4332
fax  + 1 212 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FIT0328a.pdf
 - FMT0328A.pdf


i don't think she has.  they never hung out in high school and just started
living together in jan.  they were more friendly rather than friends.
hopefully it will be fun.  she seems really nice.


We should be calc'ing the bankruptcy calc each day on the following executable:

/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.new

Thanks!


All,

I have moved to London temporarily on an assignment . My contact number is
London is 011442077834188.

Regards,
Ken


Good Morning!

Bottom line: No Changes.

For the near term (1-5), we see some cool anomalies arriving into the Dakotas by Monday already, with highs in the Dakotas in the mid-30s and lows in the mid-teens.By Tuesday, Texas and the Midwest will be in the below normal category, with Dallas overnights in the mid-30s (normal low 43), Houston's low in the mid-40s (normal upper-40s) and Chicago will freeze, with a mid-20 overnight.  Progressing into the Northeast by wednesday, Philly and New York will get into the below normal category, but 5 or 6 degree anomalies are most likely.  Looks like a three day event as it moves easterly and then is followed by moderation into the...

6-10 Day time period, which will see a cool shot over the Midwest/East towards next weekend, moderating again by early the following week. Then, early in the...

11-15 Day time period, more cool air moves in, beginning with central cooling, then even into the Southeast.

So, with normals dropping across the nation, this first cool air anomaly event arriving in the Midwest by Tuesday will elevate the nation's gas demand requirements into the 60 Bcf/d plus regime from here on through the winter.  Here's the strip beginning with today:

Sat 	11/17	47 Bcfd
Sun	11/18	52 Bcfd
Mon	11/19	55 Bcfd
Tue	11/20	67 Bcfd
Wed	11/21	69 Bcfd
Thu	11/22	65 Bcfd
Fri	11/23	65 Bcfd
Sat	11/24	63 Bcfd
Sun	11/25	63 Bcfd
Mon	11/26	65 Bcfd
Tue	11/27	65 Bcfd

Till tomorrow,

The Weather Team


Good job Rodney - keep me up to speed and let me know where I can help.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           07/18/2000 10:08 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Are we finding value in outsourcing? - GE Plastics

I believe you would be the grief master on this subject at least in terms of
"you better start delivering on this stuff".  By the way the pitch to
Colonial pipeline went okay yesterday.  Good news - Bill Scott CEO said we
were the only company that could deliver exactly what he asked for.  Bad news
is that he thought it should be 25% lower.  I believe his reaction is simply
a gut reaction from a former trader and we are following up with information
to get him better educated as to why this is a good deal for him.  We have
$20 - $30mm in the deal and this creates roughly $70mm of value or savings
(depending on your assumptions) for Colonial.  I believe we can get to a
trade with them.  I'll keep you updated.

Thanks,
Rodney

David W Delainey
07/17/2000 11:19 PM
To: Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Are we finding value in outsourcing? - GE Plastics

Rodney, interesting title- is someone giving you grief on this strategy?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000
11:13 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rodney Malcolm                           07/16/2000 11:08 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James A Ajello/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Are we finding value in outsourcing? - GE Plastics

This week we will begin discussions on structure and pricing with GE
Plastics.  At the risk of getting committed to earnings delivery I thought it
would be helpful to give a range of value to us & GE at least before the
economics start to deteriorate in negotiations.  Currently the proposal would
require GE to step up to ten year fixed price positions that would create the
following split up of economics:

Savings to GE $33MM PV
Value to Enron $15MM with $10MM of this value in bookable mark to market
$40 MM in capital invested in the Demand Side Management Projects.

I think that this suggests there should be value in our outsourcing efforts.

Thanks,
Rodney


Here are some more thoughts:
FERC should take a hard look at why the ISO is almost always in an "inc"
situation in real time.  Without structural incentives to go short into real
time, I would expect the CAISO to "inc" in some hours and "dec" in others --
with no consistent patterns.
The IOU's have four choices for purchasing power:  PX Block Forward, PX Day
Ahead, PX Day Of, and CAISO Ex Post.  They had ample opportunity to purchase
lower cost power in the PX Block Forward but didn't buy enough.  That left
them short in the Day Ahead.  They can reduce Day Ahead prices by moving some
of their load to the Ex Post market.  Dave Parquet did an Econ 101
presentation on this incentive at the CAISO board meeting in June.
The ISO remains primarily in "inc" mode even during the shoulder months when
prices are lower, another indicator that the real time "inc" problem is
driven by the load side rather than the supply side.  The IOU's continue to
go short into the ISO Ex Post market even when the CAISO Ex Post price is
consistently above the PX Day Ahead price.
There is evidence that the IOU's are not willing to pay above the CAISO price
cap for energy from the PX in the Day Ahead market.  Does it matter that the
price cap for the ISO also acts as a PX price cap?
The NOx market in California is very tight.  How has this contributed to
higher costs and has the complete lack of available NOx credits prevented any
generators from running?
How large was the impact of the below normal water year on the supply side?
The attached presentation quantifies this effect in the Northwest.  (I have a
theory on how hydro capacity completely overstates reserve margins in the
west from an economic perspective.  I can go into more detail if you wish.)
Friction between California PX and ISO markets and other western markets.
For example, why are actual flows going into the state yet prices out side of
the state are higher?  Another example of anomylous behavior is at COB on
8/11 and 8/12.  There was congestion from California TO the northwest those
days in the Day Ahead market.  In real time the NW ended up being a net
seller of about 3,000 MW from the NW TO California.
Demand Side - we really need to press on this issue because all of the
proponents of price caps claim that as soon as the demand side is "workably
competitive" then there is no need for price caps.  Is large-scale economic
demand response required for a competitive market?  What if demand response
is there, but at very high prices?  The demand response in California is a
joke.  With 2700 MW of interuptible, why did the utilities and the CAISO only
get around 600 MW of economic demand response.  Much of this response comes
at $1500/MWh.  The assymetric treatment of supply side resources and demand
side resources can be justified on environmental grounds, but not economic
grounds.  So why this assymetric treatment?  This gets to the question of the
fine line between "scarcity rents" which are ok, and market power which is
not.  If power is scarce, and demand truly values it at $1500/MWh then
shouldn't that be the price.  At what price would the rest of the
interuptible load economically curtail?  Bottom line -- there are about 2,000
MW of load that should be able to respond to price signals that chooses not
to or values power at more than $1500/MWh.
Burden of proof -- what empirical measures should be used to assess market
power?  The reports published to date have been unimpressive.  The Market
Analysis Unit report, for example, does a bunch of handwaving and then
concludes that there is market power.  But they never explain why.  I would
think that proof might be something like this:  Generator X sets price y% of
the time when loads exceed Z MWs.  Or, four generators set price 80% of the
time when prices exceed $200/MWh.  They have all the data to be able to tell,
yet they don't provide any empirical measures.  The only test I've heard of
so far is the UC Energy Institute report that demonstrates that generators
are submitting bids above their marginal cost.  The PX report states that
supply bids are fewer and at higher prices than last year.  They fail to
mention the fact that there are 5,000 fewer MW of hydro this year relative to
last.

James D Steffes@EES
08/17/2000 06:18 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FERC INVESTIGATION IN CA - What should they be looking for?

As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


Greg,

With the recent changes in the E&C organization, I am interested in exploring
other opportunities within the Wholesale group.  I would greatly appreciate
the opportunity to introduce myself to you and to get any suggestions you
might have in this regard.

Attached, for your information, is a copy of my resume.  If you have a few
moments this week, please let me know.

Thank you,

Peter


Got it.  Thanks.

Ron Gaskey
07/26/2000 02:45 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cove Point storage balance

Chris, I put a copy of the 6/00 Cove Point storage balance statement on your
desk. RG


This is a Return Receipt for the mail that you sent to
rogertan@swbell.net.

Note: this Return Receipt only acknowledges that the message was
displayed on the recipient's machine. There is no guarantee that the
content has been read or understood.

 - C.DTF
Return-path: <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
Delivery-receipt-to: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Disposition-notification-to: "Keavey, Peter F."
<Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
Received: from mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta3-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net)
 by sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLR001VWZQQS4@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims-ms-daemon; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:06:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.ngigpi.com ([205.252.36.66]) by
mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net
 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9)
 with ESMTP id <0GLR00IYZZI27X@mta3.rcsntx.swbell.net> for
 rogertan@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:01:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com
[192.152.140.9])
 by mail.ngigpi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA30179 for
 <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:22:27 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw03p.corp.enron.com
[192.168.110.110])
 by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08)
 with ESMTP id f9PJ5d322772 for <prices@intelligencepress.com>; Thu,
 25 Oct 2001 14:05:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified)
 by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1)
 with SMTP id <T56d096cdebc0a86e6e760@corp.enron.com>; Thu,
 25 Oct 2001 14:05:31 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.41])
 by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
Thu,
 25 Oct 2001 14:05:29 -0500
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:55:02 -0500
From: "Keavey, Peter F." <Peter.F.Keavey@enron.com>
To: "Dowjones1 (E-mail)" <dina.omeara@dowjones.com>,
 "Dowjones2 (E-mail)" <john.edmiston@dowjones.com>,
 "Gas Daily (E-mail)" <gas_daily@ftenergy.com>,
 "Iferc1 (E-mail)" <kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "Iferc2 (E-mail)" <liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com>,
 "NGI (E-mail)" <prices@intelligencepress.com>
Message-id:
 <3891F8E98C93214B9E3E913CB7BF600220DBB5@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed ;
 boundary="{33287F52-4045-43B4-B8FB-8231D4C291A5}"
Content-description: Daily Price Sheet.xls
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Thread-Index: AcFdho0gm7deNZ0IRFOuPu7sdqJsOA==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2001 19:05:29.0499 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[0346C6B0:01C15D88]
X-UIDL: 3a93eab200002b48


FYI, Here is the latest information on the GPM Dumas Plant. As I understand this gas will not be coming back to us.

Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Janzen, Randy
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 1:07 PM
To:	Mercaldo, Vernon; Floyd, Jodie; Trevino, Linda; DL-ETS Gas Controllers; Darrell Schoolcraft (E-mail); Gary Spraggins (E-mail); John Buchanan (E-mail); Larry Berger (E-mail); Lynn Blair (E-mail); Michael Bodnar (E-mail); Raetta Zadow (E-mail); Terry Kowalke (E-mail); Vaughan, Cara; Greaney, Chris; Scurlock, Debra; Woodson, Harry; McDaniel, Janet; Adams, Jean; Linhart, Joe; Sturr, Kathy; Janzen, Randy; Benningfield, Robert; Hibbard, Scott; Forbish, Sherry
Subject:	GPM/Duke Dumas Plant - POI 18058

This plant will be shutting down effective April 1, 2002.  I will be working with Duke and Gary Spraggins to reduce their OBA imbalance to zero before this date.  Current OBA imbalance is 62,052 dth due Duke.

Randy Janzen


Please add Lisa Lees to the distribution list for the EOL Profiles and remove
Frank Davis.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie


FYI
  - - - Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
05:49 AM ---------------------------

Todd DeCook
07/25/2000 01:07 PM
To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Earthsat Summer Seminar

---------------

The EarthSat Summer  Seminar can be downloaded from the following site...
?
ftp://ftp.earthsat.com/pub/seminar/summer00.ppt
?
Just click on the  above link to download the file, or copy the link and
paste it for the URL  address in the browser of your choice.
?
If you have any  questions or problems downloading this file, please contact
me (Scott Gay) or  Dave Birmingham at (301)231-0664.
?
-Scott
---

Scott Gay (sgay@earthsat.com)
Staff  Meteorologist/Computer Support
CROPCAST Services
Earth Satellite Corporation
Phone:  (301)231-0664
Fax:????  (301)231-5246

?
?
 - image001.gif


I'm taking Dylan's and Mark's stuff, adding a bit, and putting it into memo
format.  As I recall in class, he doesn't expect or want us to turn in
answers to questions, per se, just a 4-page (or so) memo.  I have that
right?  I'll circulate the memo later today, or first thing tomorrow in the
AM.

Best,
Jeff


Here is Jeanne's final draft.  She changed the format as the Hearing Examiner
ordered a common template to be used.  She is reviewing the transcript over
the weekend to make sure everything is covered. Let us know your comments, we
will be talking to Jeanne Monday morning.  Thanks for all your help!!!


has anyone notified EOL of our flip-out choice.  I think the product would
work like this:

Chic - Peoples      June one day withdrawal / July ratable
injection                      .015 bid     .025 offer
Chic - Peoples      June balance of month withdrawal / July ratable
injection    .015 bid     .025 offer

I think the rest of month would be more popular but we should give both a
try.  Also we need to work on an auto hedge feature for the Chicago office.

call me


Mark,

Further to our brief telephone call of last week, attached please find a
draft memo discussing certain CFTC and FERC regulatory issues relating to the
three proposals being considered by EnronOnline.? Please feel free to call me
at 212-530-5414 with any questions you may have about the attached memo.

Regards,
Eric Sanford

 <<#7253482 v3 - EnronOnline - CFTC exemption memo.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - #7253482 v3 - EnronOnline - CFTC exemption memo.doc


Hello,

The first edition of the weekly new generation report is available at:

O:_Dropbox/West New Gen/Weekly/1_10_19_01.

This is the first edition of a new report that is designed to provide Enron employees with the latest media reports and market analysis on issues affecting new power plant construction in the WSCC.  If you have any questions or comments about this new report, don't hesitate to bring them to my attention.  Thanks and enjoy,

James Bruce
Enron North America		(503) 464-8122
West Power Desk		(503) 860-8612 (c)
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306	(503) 464-3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204		James.Bruce@Enron.com


thanks for the update.  I also need the adgas contract.  I have the oman
contract and the vessel (mitsui charter)  any other contracts you can provide
is crucial, and I'd like to get them monday.  Thanks.   Jeff

Clay Harris@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/06/2001 12:14 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Dabhol

Jeff/Mike,

I understand there is some concern regarding the take-or-pay exposure under
the LNG contracts between DPC and Oman LNG and Adgas. First, there is no
direct Enron Corp exposure. Both contracts are between DPC and the related
supplier. There are no Corp performance guarantees in either SPA. Attached is
a memo sent to Jim Hughes last month outlining the contractural obligations
and current discussions with the suppliers.

From a practical standpoint both suppliers will work with us to reschedule
the start dates and to modify the fixed quantities. I  met with both
suppliers before the holidays and they reconfirmed they will work with Enron
as they understand the problems in India. We have delayed the contractural
start date under  both contracts to the maximum extent possible: February 11,
2002 for Oman and April 30, 2002 for Adgas. What this means contracturally is
more than a year to work with the suppliers. Both suppliers expect an update
on DPC when I return to the Middle East next week and both do not expect to
discuss any contract matters until the situation in India is clearer. I will
be in New Mexico through tomorrow if you want to discuss further. My phone
number is 505/336-8400.

Clay


Please see the attached work request.

Tom - If we can build a performance related characteristic to identify these
events we will follow up with another work request to look across the fleet
to identify these events.

Regards,
Hollis


Can't open- meeting w/ Breathitt went well .. still alot of work to do- will
keep you  advised.

Ralph Reed <ralph@censtrat.com> on 09/08/2000 12:14:30 PM
To: "Richard Shapiro (E-mail)" <rshapiro@enron.com>, "Steven Kean (E-mail)"
<skean.ees@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Elizabeth Stolpe

Here's another good candidate for head of the DC office you guys may want to
sit down with.  Elizabeth Stolpe headed the DC office for Champion
Industries, is highly respected on the Hill and the political community, and
got a golden parachute when International Paper bought Champion.  I have
attached her resume.  (If you can't open this, email me to that effect and
I'll fax this.)

How goes it with Breathed?

 - Elizabeth Stolpe.max


Tom, Diann and Michael,

I gave Peter Ouberg a call but then I read the PG&E rep's answer again ..

I think Tom Heckman misinterpreted what Rod Lee said.  I agree with Rod Lee.  He did not say that Enron could not submit DASRs -- he said we had to have the account on the list and if we did then the DASR would be processed.  If we did not have the account on the list, there would have to be some verification that the contract was signed on or before 9/20/01.  Enron and the other ESPs previously agreed with this approach (although the utilities did not fully buy into it).  I believe Diann submitted the account information, as we had agreed, on Nov 1. I take a little bit of issue with the comment that they will reject DASRs for accounts not on the Nov 1 list until the contract is verified, but I believe it follows the general spirit of what we agreed to at the meeting with ESPs and utilities on Oct 2.

I think Mr. Heckman thought he was being told that he could not add new facilities, but that's not how I read the reply from Mr. Lee.

So, I called Peter Ouberg back and said told him there didn't appear to be a problem after all, but that I would let him know if one cropped up.  IF you would like me to speak to Mr. Heckman, I would be happy to do so.

Sue Mara
(415) 782-7802

-----Original Message-----
From: Riley, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Huddleson,Diann; Mara, Susan
Cc: Lechner, Michael
Subject: RE: Dueling rulings on direct access

Sue, Diann,

It appears PG&E is telling our customers they cannot add accounts where
allowed by a contract as well.  What can we do to get PG&E to stop providing
misinformation to our customers?

Tom

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Lechner, Michael
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:51 PM
> To:	Riley, Tom
> Subject:	FW: Dueling rulings on direct access
>
> Per your request re.: Tom Heckmann of Sutter Health.
>
> Regards,
>
> T. Michael Lechner, P. E.
> Service Manager
> Enron Energy Services
> Phone:	925-543-3833
> Pager:	888-562-9418
> Cell:	925-698-5670
> Fax:	925-543-3550
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	"Heckmann, Thomas" <HeckmaT@sutterhealth.org>@ENRON@EES
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:00 PM
> To:	'Lee, Rod'
> Cc:	Carroll, Janice; Wright, Bill; Evans, Kelley
> Subject:	Dueling rulings on direct access
>
> But CPUC D.01-10-036 of 10/10/01 states:
> >
> >      "For purposes of utility compliance with D.01-09-060, we want to
> make
> > it clear that, unless otherwise directed or allowed to in a subsequent
> > Commission decision, utilities cannot set a deadline after which they
> could refuse to
> > process DASRs relating to contracts executed on or before September 20,
> > 2001."
>
> Our contract is before Sept 20.
> New DASR's can occur any time.
>
> Since we disagree, I suppose we may have to get an opinion from the CPUC.
>
> Tom Heckmann, PhD
> Contract Analyst
> Sutter Health System Procurement
> 1600 Cebrian St
> West Sacramento, CA  95691
> (916) 373-3420 phone
> (916) 373-3470 fax
> (916) 373-6706 page
> <heckmat@sutterhealth.org>
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From:	Lee, Rod [SMTP:RZL1@pge.com]
> 	Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:45 AM
> 	To:	'Heckmann, Thomas'
> 	Subject:	RE: Forthcoming Direct Access DASR's
>
> 	Tom,
>
> 	The CPUC's Decision 01-09-060 specifically prohibits any new
> contracts, agreements & "arrangements"  post Sept 20th.  Accounts that
> were
> under contract on or prior to September 20th, are eligible for DA at
> anytime
> afterwards. The Commission has ordered the UDCs to accept DASRs
> indefinitely
> for customer accounts that meet the Sept. 20th customer "contract"
> deadline.
>
>
> 	The November 1 deadline still exists & presumably Enron has
> submitted Sutter's valid account numbers on that list. If DASRs are
> submitted on accounts that are not on the list they will be rejected until
> such time that verification of a legitimate contract exists.
>
> 	Roderick Lee
> 	Corporate Account Manager
> 	Office - 415  973-4830
> 	Cell Phone 415 244-1647
> 	Fax - 415  973-8494
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Heckmann, Thomas [ mailto:HeckmaT@sutterhealth.org
> <mailto:HeckmaT@sutterhealth.org> ]
> 	Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:25 PM
> 	To: Lee, Rod
> 	Subject: Forthcoming Direct Access DASR's
>
>
> 	Rod,
>
> 	On the question of whether new accounts can be added to old
> contracts ...
>
> 	The October 12 PG&E implementation plan for direct access
> "wind-down" you
> 	recently shared with me gave deadlines of October 5 and November 1,
> 	respectively, for ESP's to provide names of customers and details of
> 	customer accounts to be added to direct access.
>
> 	I quote additional wording referring to the above  " ... time-lines
> require
> 	ESP's to specify ... those customers by name whose contracts qualify
> them
> 	for the submission of additional DASR's"
>
> 	Thus PG&E's plan clearly contemplates the addition of new accounts
> to old
> 	contracts.
>
> 	Now,  October 20, CPUC ruling D.01-10-036 states:
> 	>
> 	>      "For purposes of utility compliance with D.01-09-060, we want
> to make
> 	> it clear that, unless otherwise directed or allowed to in a
> subsequent
> 	> Commission decision, utilities cannot set a deadline after which
> they
> 	could refuse to
> 	> process DASRs relating to contracts executed on or before
> September 20,
> 	> 2001."
>
> 	Therefore, it being PG&E's intent to let new accounts be DASR'd to
> old
> 	agreements which include a provision for adding new accounts, and it
> being
> 	the CPUC's explicit ruling that no time limit be set on this
> activity,
> 	Sutter Health is moving forward with plans to add a number of
> accounts to
> 	its current direct access arrangement with Enron.
>
> 	Please let me know if you anticipate any barriers to this action at
> your
> 	end, as arrangements with Enron will take a lot of time and energy.
>
> 	Cordially,
>
> 	Tom Heckmann, PhD
> 	Contract Analyst
> 	Sutter Health System Procurement
> 	1600 Cebrian St
> 	West Sacramento, CA  95691
> 	(916) 373-3420 phone
> 	(916) 373-3470 fax
> 	(916) 373-6706 page
> 	<heckmat@sutterhealth.org>
>
>
>
>


can you build something to look at historical prices from where we saved
curves each night.

Here is an example that pulls socal only.
Improvements could include a drop down menu to choose any curve and a choice
of index,gd, or our curves.


may have been updated a bit prior to the presentation, but yep, that's it.
will do for now.  please forward to rick.  when i'm back in the office i'll
do more searching.  thanks a bunch.  i'm assuming this is what he's referring
to.

Best,
Jeff


Richardson is headed back to the Forrestal Building to
sign the order...

DJ US Richardson Declares Emergency Powers In Calif

Dow Jones International News Service -- December 13,
2000  [Return to Headlines]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

2107GMT

DJ DOE To Order Power Delivered To Calif At Set Rates
(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

2108GMT

*DJ DOE Action To Stem Calif Rolling Balckouts
(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

2109GMT

*DJ Calif Gov Davis,Sen. Feinstein Urge Immediate FERC
Moves
(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

2110GMT

DJ US DOE/Calif -2: Action Targets `Unfair Profit'
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Looking to avert eminent
blackouts in California, U.S. Energy Secretary Bill
Richardson asserted Wednesday his emergency authority
under the Federal Power Act to order power producers
to make electricity available to the state.

The action came as more than one dozen power producers
informed the California Independent System Operator
they wouldn't make power available unless they receive
payment guarantees.

"I can order a power plant to send power where
needed," Richardson said at a press conference in
Washington. Richardson said he would mandate the price
power producers will receive, promising "a fair
return."

Richardson said, "I won't allow (power producers) to
unfairly profit due to today's market situation."

(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

2125GMT

DJ US DOE/Calif -3: FERC Pledges `Strong Action Soon'
Richardson's announcement came at a press conference
in the Washington office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein,
D-Calif., following a meeting Feinstein brokered
between Richardson, California Gov. Gray Davis, and
James Hoecker, chairman of the U.S. Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission.

The press conference came as the California grid
operator was on the brink of failing in its nearly
yearlong effort to keep the lights on in the state in
the face of chronic power shortages.

Davis and Feinstein said they asked the FERC chairman
to issue an order establishing a region-wide
electricity price cap to stop the hourly export of
between 4,000 megawatts to 5,000 MW out of the state's
troubled market. They also called for FERC to order
power producers to enter into long-term contracts with
the state's distribution utilities at reasonable
prices.

Hoecker pledged that FERC would take "strong action
soon" in response to the electricity crisis. "We
believe in competitive markets, but they have to
behave responsibly and at reasonable prices," he said.

The commission is scheduled to meet Friday morning to
issue a final order restructuring the state's
problem-plagued electricity market. A key issue in the
pending order will be the establishment of price caps.

Hoecker declined to comment on what actions the
commission will take, and on whether the commission
would act sooner than Friday.

Last Friday, the commission issued an order in
response to an emergency petition from California's
grid operator lifting a $250 a megawatt-hour hard
price cap in California's power markets. Prices soon
hit $600/MWh, and have risen above $1,000/MWh since
then, spiking at one point to $1,400/MWh.

Feinstein and Davis accused power producers of
engaging in price gouging at the expense of California
consumers and utilities in the state, which can't pass
on the high cost due to a state-mandated rate freeze.
The escalating prices in the last week have caused a
liquidity crunch for Southern California Edison Co.
(EIX) and Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PCG), and have
pushed the companies to the brink of bankruptcy.

Davis called the crisis affecting California's
deregulated power market - the first in the nation -
"an incredibly bizarre situation" illustrating "how
markets can be manipulated." Davis expressed optimism
that Richardson's emergency actions will "stop market
abuses" and bring temporary relief.

-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647;
bryan.lee@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


I'm just sending the sheets that are saved in our system. Bill Williams told
me he cleared everything up on the Real Time side yesterday, but if the
volumes in these documents still look wrong, please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


they are with reliant canada.


I'm in good shape now.  Just a little left for today.

Is Ric getting sentimental?  Losing someone can make you feel that way, even
if it isn't logical.

We'll just get through this day and start over tomorrow.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/11/2000 04:33 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Bruce Silvers

Bruce probably hasn't heard from Nick yet.  I'll check again tomorrow.  When
will you know when you are going to NY?  Sunday?

If you need help with a document, say something, I can help you (stay late
whatever).  That's what I'm here for.  I figured something was up and I'm
hormonal, so I've just stayed to myself today.

Ric emailed me about whether to pay his mother's, brother's and sister's way
down for his birthday.  Now, he never hears from his sister and hardly ever
hears from his brother except when he sends him his monthly payment that he
owes him and that's just a check.  I told him to bring his mother down and
the others can fend for themselves.  I was afraid I would hurt his feelings,
but he said he felt the same way.  I will not have anyone taking advantage of
him.  I'd be the same way with my brother if I never talked to him.  Emma
wouldn't be nearly as spoiled as she is!!!!  Can you tell I'm hormonal, I'm
just bitching away.

Are you ok now with your document?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	10/11/2000 04:28 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Bruce Silvers

Thanks for checking.  I'm on message 7 of 9, and don't have anything from
Bruce.

Sorry I was cranking this am.  I got here at 600am, mostly because I had
problems with a document which had to go out today.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/11/2000 04:11 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Bruce Silvers

Have you heard from Bruce Silvers?  He called and left me a voicemail that he
was free all day Monday, but he was checking with Nick Palatin.  I haven't
heard any more from him and was wondering if he called you.  Just following
up.


Steve,

As you discussed with Linda on Friday attached is a proposed memo for
distribution.

If you have any questions please let us know.

Thanks,

Carolyn


Enron/Reuters Working Group:

Attached are revised Order Forms and a revised Terms & Conditions.  Please
note
the following changes:

References to "Enron Corporation" have been changed to "Enron Corp."

A termination right for the data portion of the transaction has been inserted
in
the Order Form for data.

References to "Distributor's Subsidiaries" have been added in the license
grant
in Section 4.1 of the T&C as well as in the indemnification section in Section
14 to extend the indemnification protection by Reuters to Distributor's
Subsidiaries.  Because of the wider scope of the license, a Section 16.10 has
been added to make clear that if any of Distributor's Subdiairies breach the
Agreement, Reuters will look to Enron Corp. rather than the individual
subsidiary.  The reason for this is that although Reuters acknowledges that
Enron's subsidiaries may be involved in operating the URLs, Reuters does not
want to be put in a situation in which it has to search for the relevant
subsidiary to remedy the breach.

Mark:
I hope the added language addresses your concern regarding the protection of
Enron's Affiliates and the ability of Affiliates to participate in the
operation
of URLs.  Please call to discuss if necessary (646-298-9571).

(See attached file: Enron-Investor-T&C 42100 (revised).doc)(See attached file:
Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc)(See attached file:
Enron-Investor-DataOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc)

Regards,

Stanford Lin
Senior Legal Counsel

-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
 - Enron-Investor-T&C 42100 (revised).doc
 - Enron-Investor-NewsOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc
 - Enron-Investor-DataOrderForm 42100 (revised).doc


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 06:46 AM -----

	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
	02/09/2001 02:48 PM

		 To: US REGULATORY COMMITTEE <USREGCOMM@isda.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: DRAFT SUMMARY OF S. 220 POINTS

At Stacy's request, I am forwarding a draft of the points drafted by Seth
Grosshandler and Ed Rosen of Cleary and Dan Cunningham.  These are the
points discussed at yesterday's Bankruptcy Reform meeting at TBMA.

 - Doc1.doc


Dabhol lenders to vote today on PPA PPPPA termination
Business Standard, 05/16/01

Enron to suspend investments of 600 mln usd in Brazil energy sector
AFX News, 05/15/01

USA: Sempra unit to boost natgas delivery to California.
Reuters English News Service, 05/15/01

Enron Urges Reforms In Japan Electricity Market-Nikkei
Dow Jones International News, 05/15/01

Enron Agrees to Provide Market Data to NGX
PR Newswire, 05/15/01

UAE To Seek New Partners If Enron Exits Dolphin Gas Proj
Dow Jones International News, 05/15/01

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)
Bloomberg, 05/15/01

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)
Bloomberg, 05/15/01

Dabhol lenders to vote today on PPA PPPPA termination
Our Banking Bureau Mumbai

05/16/2001
Business Standard
1
Copyright (c) Business Standard

The 25-odd lenders to the Dabhol power project will vote today on whether the
Enron-promoted Dabhol Power Company (DPC) should be allowed to to serve a
preliminary PPA termination notice to the Maharashtra State Electricity Board
(MSEB). The voting will take place through conference calls criss-crossing
the globe at 6.30 pm, Indian Standard Time. Even though the three Indian
lenders_ the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI), the State Bank of
India (SBI) and ICICI_ have decided to vote against the proposition, they
will not be able to block the move.
Technically, the proposal can be passed if four per cent of lenders are in
favour of the termination notice. In effect, it will be passed if one of the
25 lenders casts its vote in favour of it. So, it's almost a foregone
conclusion that DPC will be asked to issue its termination notice.
Multilateral agency J-Exim, which has provided guarantees, will not
participate in the exercise. Barring J-Exim, other financial intermediaries
including global arrangers ABN Amro, Citi, ANZIB, CSFB and other banks and
OPIC will cast their votes tomorrow. "In the first round, Indian lenders put
their foot down and refused to give clearance to the termination notice.
Thistime around they will not be able to block the move any more. The Indian
lenders alone cannot save the controversial $3 billion as some of the foreign
lenders are in favour of issuing the termination notice," said a source. The
Indian lenders are in favour of completing the project without any time and
cost over-run. They have disbursed about 80 per cent of their Rs 1,500 crore
worth of loan commitments to phase II of the project, 93 per cent of which is
complete. The trial run is expected to commence in June. The board of the
Dabhol Power Company has already authorised Enron India managing director, K
Wade Cline, to serve a termination notice as and when he deems fit. At a
meeting of the lenders last month in London, the foreign lenders were keen
that the termination notice be served in the face of defaults by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and the Union government's refusal
to honour the counter-guarantee of Rs 102 crore for the December bill. The
domestic lenders are not covered by the counter-guarantee if the contract is
terminated. The foreign lenders are covered by the counter-guarantee.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron to suspend investments of 600 mln usd in Brazil energy sector

05/15/2001
AFX News
(c) 2001 by AFP-Extel News Ltd

SAO PAULO (AFX) - Enron Corp will suspend investments of 600 mln usd in the
Brazilian energy sector, news agency JB Online quoted Enron vice-president
and Eletricidade e Servicos SA Elektro chairman Orlando Gonzales as saying.
Of the total investment, 500 mln usd was to be assigned to the expansion of
the thermoelectric plant Cuiaba II in the state of Mato Grosso, and in the
construction of Rogen in the state of Rio de Janeiro, with the remainder to
be invested in unit Elektro, it said.
"There are no clear regulations for the sector. Regulatory issues are holding
back investments," JB Online quoted Gonzales as saying.
Gonzales said the decision to suspend the investments may be reconsidered if
the energy sector regulator Aneel establishes clearer regulations.
mg/as
For more information and to contact AFX: www.afxnews.com and www.afxpress.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: Sempra unit to boost natgas delivery to California.

05/15/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

SAN FRANCISCO, May 15 (Reuters) - Southern California Gas Co. (SCG) said in a
statement on Tuesday it will add around 200 million cubic feet a day, or
about six percent, to its pipeline system by the end of the year in order to
meet the surge in demand for gas-fired power generation.
Today's announcement comes two months after SCG, a unit of Sempra Energy ,
proposed to increase capacity on its system by 175 mmcfd, or five percent.
Both projects will add around 11 percent of new gas capacity to its
transmission system this year, the company said in a statement.
In its latest proposal, called the Kramer Junction Interconnect, SCG said it
would build a 32-mile pipeline link to the Kern-Mojave pipeline system that
will allow it to deliver around 200 mmcfd into its system.
The new capacity would be enough to drive three 500-megawatt power plants or
enough gas to serve 1.4 million residential customers a day, the statement
said.
SCG, the nation's largest gas utility with more 18 million consumers in
central and Southern California, said utilization of its intrastate
transmission system in the past nine months had jumped from 75 percent to
over 95 percent, due largely to the rise in gas-fired power generation.
The company's announcement is the latest in several proposals to expand gas
pipeline capacity to California, where demand for gas is expected to jump
because of the number of gas-fired power plants being built or scheduled for
construction.
Gas is already used to generate about a third of California's electricity.
And since April 1999, the state has approved 13 major gas-fired power plant
projects with a combined generation capacity of more than 8,900 megawatts.
Nine gas-fired power plants, with a total generation capacity of more than
6,000 megawatts, are under construction.
Over the past two months plans to build or expand gas lines serving
California have been announced by Enron unit Transwestern, Williams Cos' Kern
River Transmission, El Paso Corp. units El Paso Natural Gas Co. and Mohave
Pipeline Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. unit National Energy Group,
Questar Corp. , Calpine Corp. , and Kinder Morgan .

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Urges Reforms In Japan Electricity Market-Nikkei

05/15/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

TOKYO (Nikkei)--Asserting that cuts in electricity prices will help Japanese
companies save as much as Y4 trillion, major U.S. energy firm Enron Corp.
(ENE) on Tuesday urged Japanese power firms to revamp the electricity market
by separating operations such as power generation, transmission and
distribution, The Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported.
Enron's 10-point proposal also calls for the construction of more power
plants and full-scale deregulation of retail electricity, including sales to
households. If such measures are carried out and electricity prices fall to
match the levels of other industrialized nations, Japan's industrial sector
could trim its costs by Y4 trillion, Enron said.
At a seminar on power industry deregulation hosted by Enron, the company
asserted that Japan's deregulation in such areas as wholesale electricity
auctions in 1996 and bulk retail sales last year has not brought significant
benefits to end-users.
New suppliers entering the market only account for a combined 0.4% of the
entire electricity sector, Enron said, criticizing the fact that power plant
facilities are mainly concentrated among electric power companies.
Regarding prices, an official representing operators of power generation
facilities asserted that "industrial-use electricity prices in Japan are
stuck at a high level at around Y13 per kilowatt, compared with Y5 in the
U.S., Y3 in Canada, Y9 in Germany and Y4-Y8 in Southeast Asia."
In fact, department store operator Takashimaya Co. (8233 or J.TKA), which
last November switched to new market entrants for part of its electricity
supply, was able to cut costs by Y450 million in the first year, said a
company official.
Enron hopes to generate competition by urging Japanese electric utilities to
spin off different operations, analysts say. If the number of power
generation facility operators increases, this will help bolster Japan's
electricity trading market, an area in which Enron has a strong business
interest.
Splitting electricity operations into generation, transmission and
distribution is expected to open the electric utility network to new
entrants. This will boost transparency in the fees that electric power
companies charge for transmitting power on behalf of the operators of power
generation facilities, Enron says.
Citing the power shortage in California, however, Japan's electricity sector
has strongly opposed such spin-offs, stating that generation and distribution
must be part of a single continuum to ensure a stable supply.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Agrees to Provide Market Data to NGX

05/15/2001
PR Newswire
(Copyright (c) 2001, PR Newswire)

CALGARY, May 15 /PRNewswire/ - NGX Canada Inc. (NGX), a wholly owned
subsidiary of OM AB (OM), today announced that an arrangement has been made
with Enron Canada Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp. (Enron),
whereby trading data from certain contracts listed on Enron's online trading
system, EnronOnline will be included in the computation of three Alberta Gas
Price Indices.
NGX acquired the AECO "C" & NIT Daily Spot, One-Month Spot, and Bid-Week Spot
gas price indices (Alberta Gas Price Indices) from Canadian Enerdata Ltd.
last September. Subsequent to the acquisition of the Alberta Gas Price
Indices, NGX has provided real-time information to its customers on the
establishment of the weighted average price indices based on transactions
conducted through NGX's trading system. Canadian Enerdata Limited continues
to publish the Alberta Gas Price Indices in the Canadian Gas Price Reporter.
Peter Krenkel, President of NGX, stated, "We believe that inclusion of data
from EnronOnline will serve to make our price indices among the best in North
America. The industry has been very supportive of the visibility and
integrity we are able to bring to the Alberta Gas Price Indices, which
removes the guesswork around gas price index methodology. However, after
reviewing the matter with Enron and other industry participants, we
recognized that Enron had legitimate concerns and the industry felt that
"more is better". The inclusion of data from the highly liquid EnronOnline
system should improve the quality of our price indices even further."
Rob Milnthorp, President and CEO of Enron Canada commented, "We are very
pleased to have EnronOnline transactions included in the Alberta Gas Price
Indices. This will provide industry participants with a more comprehensive
source of data and a better opportunity to manage risk around these price
indices as they are now assured that all their transactions on EnronOnline
will be included in the computation of the Alberta Price Indices."
The inclusion of EnronOnline data satisfies the principal claims made by
Enron in their legal action against NGX, Canadian Enerdata Ltd., OM and
Richard Zarzeczny and Enron has agreed to discontinue the legal action
against those parties with the conclusion of this arrangement.
NGX and Enron are planning to implement the necessary system changes by
August 1, 2001 but in any event will provide at least thirty days notice to
the industry. Once in operation, data from transactions in the relevant
contracts listed on EnronOnline will be fed to NGX in real-time. The
methodology for computing the Alberta Gas Price Indices will continue to be
on a weighted-average basis.
NGX will engage independent auditors to insure full compliance with the Index
Methodology Guide. This guide is available on NGX's website at www.ngx.com.
NGX located in Calgary, Canada provides electronic trading and clearing
services to natural gas buyers and sellers at seven markets in Canada. Over
the past six years, NGX has grown to serve over 120 customers with trading
activity averaging 225,000 TJ's per month. NGX is owned 100% by OM
(www.om.com).
OM is a leader in providing products and services in the field of transaction
technology. The company, with assets exceeding CDN $700 million, operates
exchanges in Calgary, London and Stockholm and develops technology that
increases the efficiency of financial and energy markets throughout the
world. OM is listed on Stockholmsborsen (ticker symbol "OM").
Enron Corp. is one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas and
communications companies. The company, with revenues of U.S. $101 billion in
2000, markets electricity and natural gas, delivers physical commodities and
financial risk management services to customers around the world, and has
developed an intelligent network platform to facilitate online business.
Fortune magazine has named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six
consecutive years. Enron's Internet address is www.enron.com. The stock is
traded under the ticker symbol "ENE".
Canadian Enerdata Ltd. (www.enerdata.com) located in Markham Ontario has been
providing information services to the North American energy industry for over
17 years. Enerdata publishes the Canadian Gas Price Reporter, PriceLine
Daily, Natural Gas Market Report and Canadian Energy Trends. Enerdata also
sponsors GasFair & Power, Canada's largest natural gas and electricity market
conference and trade show, now in its 11th year. SOURCE NGX Canada Inc.

/CONTACT: Enron Corp. - Mr. Eric Thode, Director of Public Relations,
713-853-9053; NGX Canada Inc.- Mr. Peter Krenkel, President, 403-974-1705; OM
- Ms. Anna Eriksson - Vice President Corporate Communications, +46 (8) 405 66
12; Canadian Enerdata Ltd. - Mr. Richard Zarzeczny, President, 905-479-9697/
11:17 EDT

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UAE To Seek New Partners If Enron Exits Dolphin Gas Proj

05/15/2001
Dow Jones International News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

DUBAI -(Dow Jones)- If U.S.-based Enron Corp. (ENE) pulls out of the $3.5
billion Dolphin gas project, in which the company holds a 24.5% stake, the
U.A.E. Offsets Group, or UOG, will consider other companies to replace it, a
United Arab Emirates industry source close to the project said Tuesday.
Industry sources Monday said Enron is considering withdrawing from the
project because it doesn't believe it will be profitable.
Dolphin, an agreement signed two years ago by UOG and Qatar Petroleum, plans
to bring 2 billion cubic feet a day of natural gas from Qatar's offshore
North Field to Abu Dhabi and onward to Dubai.
Enron and TotalFinaElf (TOT) each hold a 24.5% stake in the project, while
UOG owns the remaining 51%.
Enron is set to focus on the midstream part of the project - gas
transportation - which requires building a 350-kilometer pipeline from a
processing plant in Ras Laffan, Qatar, to the Taweelah terminal in Abu Dhabi
and the Jebel Ali terminal in Dubai.
The U.A.E. source said originally, it was thought that the U.A.E. government
would fund the pipeline, which is estimated to cost around $1 billion.
However, more recently, the source said the U.A.E. suggested that Enron put
up the money itself.
Other industry sources said Enron and TotalFinaElf also had to pay
significant fees to join the project. TotalFinaElf will
operate the upstream part of the project, which includes developing
natural gas reserves in two blocks of the North Field. First wells are
scheduled to be drilled in the second half of 2001 and come onstream in
2005.

Last week, the Middle East Economic Survey reported that the foreign partners
haven't yet agreed on the precise details of their working relationship or on
the price of the pipeline.
Qatar Petroleum and Dolphin Energy Ltd., a subsidiary of UOG, signed an
initial agreement in March for the upstream section of the project. A full
agreement is expected to be concluded in September, the source said.
-By Dyala Sabbagh, Dow Jones Newswires; 9714 331 4260;
dyala.sabbagh@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)
2001-05-15 16:35 (New York)

Enron Should Sell Utility to Oregon, Lawmaker Argues (Update2)

     (Updates with closing share prices.)

     Washington, May 15 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp. should sell
Portland General Electric Co. to Oregon so state consumers can be
insulated from soaring electricity prices, a congressman said.
     ``Purchasing PGE would give Oregon ratepayers more control by
keeping its assets in Oregon, accountable solely to Oregonians,''
U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio, a Democrat from Springfield,
Oregon, said in a letter to Governor John Kitzhaber.
     The governor is considering DeFazio's proposal, said
Kitzhaber spokesman Kevin Smith.
     Last month, Houston-based Enron, the biggest energy trader,
agreed to cancel the $3.1 billion sale of Portland General, a
utility with more than 700,000 Oregon customers, to Sierra Pacific
Resources of Reno, Nevada.
     Enron and Sierra Pacific blamed laws spawned by high power
prices and electricity shortages in the West for the sale's
collapse.
     ``We are pleased to keep Portland General in our asset
portfolio because it's a solid earnings performer,'' Enron
spokeswoman Karen Denne said. ``If approached by a buyer who
recognizes its value, we'd consider selling it.'' She declined to
comment on a potential bid by Oregon.
     The state should act swiftly, DeFazio said, citing press
reports that the U.K.'s Scottish Power Plc, owner of PacifiCorp,
the largest utility in the U.S Northwest, may bid for Portland
General.
     Scottish Power, based in Glasgow, Scotland, would have more
than 70 percent of Oregon electricity customers if it added
Portland General, raising ``serious regulatory concerns about
market power,'' he said.

                            Bond Issue

     Oregon could issue bonds to purchase Portland General, using
the utility's profits to pay the debt, DeFazio said. The state
might run it as a public utility or a cooperative, he said.
     Enron and Sierra Pacific called off the Portland General sale
because of laws passed by Nevada and California legislators that
slow the deregulation of their wholesale power markets.
     California and Nevada have blocked sales of power plants by
utilities. Sierra Pacific had to sell a stake in a Nevada power
plant that sells power to California to win regulatory approval of
the Portland General purchase.
     Average power prices on the California-Oregon border this
year have soared ninefold to $296.34 a megawatt hour over the year-
earlier period. A megawatt hour can light 750 average California
homes for an hour.
     Shares of Enron fell $1.76 to $$56.99. They've fallen 31
percent this year.
     Sierra Pacific rose 9 cents to $16.09. Scottish Power rose 9
pence to 492 ($7) in London.

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)
2001-05-15 16:26 (New York)

Enron to Provide Gas Prices to NGX, Drops Lawsuit (Update1)

     (Adds closing share price.)

     Houston, May 15 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the world's
biggest energy trader, agreed to provide natural-gas pricing
information to NGX Canada Inc. and drop a C$100 million
($64.7 million) suit against the Canadian gas exchange.
     Enron sued NGX in November after the Internet exchange, a
unit of the company that owns the Stockholm Stock Exchange,
changed providers of its gas-pricing data and didn't include
trades on EnronOnline, Enron's Internet exchange, when calculating
gas-price indexes.
     Calgary-based NGX agreed to include EnronOnline trades in
calculating its Alberta Gas Price Indices by August, Enron
spokesman Eric Thode said.
     NGX, owned by Stockholm's OM Gruppen AB, is used by about 90
percent of Canadian gas traders, and many traders use EnronOnline
to sell gas from western Canada, the biggest supplier of the
cleaner-burning fuel to the U.S.
     Houston-based Enron fell $1.76 to $56.99.


Jeff,

 I received the rent roll.  I am going to be in San Marcos this weekend but I
am booked with stage coach.  I will drive by Friday evening.
 I will let you know next week if I need to see the inside.  Can you find out
when Chelsea Villa last changed hands and for what price?

 What about getting a look at the site plans for the Burnet deal.  Remember
we have to get Brenda happy.

Phillip


Dear Benjamin Rogers,

You have been invited to participate in a deal on DealBench, sponsored by
Enron for LV Cogen.

You are about to experience firsthand our secure platform that enables
clients to conduct their business on the web. We provide a collaborative
environment to share documents, conduct auctions, host webcasts, manage deal
information and monitor deal progress - instantly, efficiently and
effectively.

In order to be able to view the deal, you have to update your user profile
with the deal key: 9703517744633713. This will enable you to view the deal
and participate in the process.  Please also remember that this deal key is
specific to the above deal.

We are looking forward to working with you.

If you have any questions or are unable to access the system, please email us
at: Webmaster@DealBench.com or call us at: +1-713-853-9438.

We encourage your feedback on both the platform and service, either via email
or telephone.

Kind regards,

WebMaster
DealBench


Tammy

Come and see me first thing.  The gas section is way long and complicated.


Thank you for taking the time to complete this interim assessment.

Step 1
Click once on this web site address   https://secure.board.lilly.com/

Step 2
Your computer will automatically open your internet connection and take you
to this screen.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic28617.pcx)

Step 3
Enter your full e-mail address in the blank provided and click once on
"Begin Survey".

Step 4
Answer each question as you are prompted and click the "Next Question"
button.

Step 5
After you have completed question 5 you can simply close your internet
application - there is no need to logout.

If you experience problems you can call me at 317-276-3298.

Thank you again for taking the time to complete the assessment.

 - pic28617.pcx


From: Jim Little on 01/09/2001 09:08 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: West Desk - Financial Liquidations for Physical Index Positions for
December 2000

----- Forwarded by Jim Little/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:08 AM -----

	Anne Bike@ENRON
	01/04/2001 03:07 PM

		 To: Frank Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carla Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: West Desk - Financial Liquidations for Physical Index Positions for
December 2000

Attached is the file containing details for the Financial Liquidations
relating to Physical Index trades.  Thanks to Troy and Jim, we have
eliminated the duplication of the intra-month transport liquidations in the
daily P/L.  The Liquidations for transport that are included below are
positions that must be rolled out of my intra-month book and into the FT-West
P/L.  The offsetting liquidations should be coming through Chris Walker's
Financial Liquidations Process.   We are still unable to provide support out
of ERMS for the liquidations relating to transport.  I have included the
values for all of the intra-month December Liquidations below.

Index
Positions
  $(2,534,426) Support attached
Intra-month Transport Options Spreads                            $(228,657)
Transport Model - No Support - Offsetting value in FT-West
Intra-month Transport Demand Reimbursement                $73,582 Transport
Model - No Support - Offsetting Value in FT-West

TOTAL Liquidations for December                                ($2,689,501)

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.  Thanks.

Anne Bike
x5-7735


Attached is the request for the new book for NG-Price that will include all
options.

Thanks,

Errol


Attached is the final version of of Transwestern's response to the CPUC's protest in Docket No. RP97-288-017. The attachment was filed with FERC last Wednesday.


Dear Sports Fan,

At Betquick, we allow any sports combination in a parlay.
You can mix and match up to 6 different sports teams in
a parlay.  You can even parlay a Golf match-up with a
football team or whatever team you desire.

We also offer the following:

 1. Post several straight bets with one click of the
    confirm button.

 2. Make an If-Win bet.
    Example: If my parlay or straight bet wins bet the
    following...

 3. Reverse bets

 4. Round Robin or Box

 And much, much more...

If that's not enough, we will add 15% to your deposit to
try our fully licensed online sportsbook. This offer is
good until September 6, 2001.

Sincerely,
Roger Dunhill
www.BetQuick.com

*****************************************************
We strongly oppose the use of SPAM email and do not want
anyone who does not wish to receive our mailings to receive
them. This is not SPAM. If you do not wish to receive
further mailings, please reply to this email with remove in
the subject matter.
*****************************************************


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 08:53 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/05/2000 09:33 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "MBD" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Draft Proposal to CPUC

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EES"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").
The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in undertaking its
investigation into the problems in the California electric markets by
producing a limited quantity of specified information on a timely basis.  We
believe that the limited production we propose will enable the Commission to
commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange
of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission agrees that by
cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents, the Enron Entities
have not waived any objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever
and that any claims, defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or
other responses have been specifically reserved and can be raised in the
future, if necessary.   For all of these proposals, we exclude documents
that are protected from disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work
product privileges.

 [SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION:  Generally speaking, the documents and
information that the Commission seeks can be found, if they exist, within
EPMI, EES and Portland General.  To the extent that EEMC or EESO are
relevant to the Commission's investigation, any documents would be located
within EES.  Thus, we do not anticipate specific document productions from
either EEMC or EESO.]

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can
provide it.  With respect to the other entities, to the extent that
corporate histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate
producing these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic Transaction Documents for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered which includes economic data.   It is
intended that this economic data will provide the Commission with financial
information regarding the Enron Entities which will be useful to its
investigation.   We anticipate producing public filings regarding financial
data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic Transaction Documents in the
second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are limited in number and there will probably be limited
documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent they act as a
scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell generation
output, do not have the specific documents that pertain to each generation
unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General, do have
documents and information for Enron Wind, Saguaro and Las Vegas
Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
document productions.

  For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about one
half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  In addition, those
transactions which do involve Portland General sales into California are
limited to sales to the ISO and PX, and long term contracts with two small
California municipal utilities.  Thus, the Commission will receive the
essential transactional information regarding these sales from the ISO and
PX.  Nevertheless, Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000
electronic Transaction Documents in summary form similar to the data being
provided by other Enron Entities, to the extent relevant.  [We propose that
the Commission defer requesting production of other information until it has
reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant proportion of
their energy into the California market.  At that time a more accurate
assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will be valuable
given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the California
wholesale market.]

[Alternate ending to paragraph:   We propose for the voluminous Portland
General generating cost and maintenance data, that these documents be made
available in Portland for inspection from a representative sampling of
facilities.  If there are specific documents that the Commission would like
copied from that production, we can discuss the arrangements for producing
these documents.  We propose to make these documents available in Portland
in a third wave of document productions]

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19

 We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of transaction data
for year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for
the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty,
quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is a purchase or a
sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this information, it is
possible that some entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those
transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.
The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's
customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
business.  EES is a retail provider of electricity, and plays a far more
limited role in the wholesale markets which are the subject of the
Commission investigation.  However, EES can also provide similar electronic
Transaction Data with the proviso that it will not include the specific
names of its retail customers but instead will provide a blind customer
number.  This additional restriction is important to EES because many of
EES's customers have agreements whereby they must be notified of any
subpoena and provided an opportunity to object.  EES cannot meet your time
frame to release information and give its customers the notice they require.
Given that EES was a retail provider and the fact that the identity of
retail customers is of little or no relevance to the functioning of the
wholesale market, we do not believe protecting the identity of retail
customers is an unreasonable limitation or narrowing of the request.  We
anticipate producing the transaction data in the second wave of document
productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition, if, at the
request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the Commission or a
court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests for production be
limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities reserve the right to
limit the production of documents in conformance with such order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Ludmila Kaminski
Escondido Village, 32B
Stanford University, CA 94305


I spoke with Robin last night for a minute.  You didn't tell me how good church was on Sunday.   She said Kathy Florence really preached and encouraged me to buy the tape!  It must have been awesome!

Anyway, are you going to rehearsal tonight?  How are things going with Steve's party and have you set a time yet?  What does he want/need  for his birthday?  I know he loves Power Rangers, but is there anything else, maybe something you had been planning to buy, (pajamas, underwear, shirt, pants, socks, etc.)

Talk to ya!


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001 08:47 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/14/2001 08:47 PM

		 To: sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
Lynn.A.Lednicky@Dynegy.com, john.harrison@elpaso.com,
rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com, skean@enron.com,
tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com, randy.harrison@mirant.com,
alex.goldberg@williams.com
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Greetings:
In order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were on
the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael Hoffman of
the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed that the
calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would take
the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy makers, and
advocating whatever plan the group develops.
Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face, for
however long it takes to work out a resolution.
It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning of
next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to be
brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan B is
a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an alternative to
the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that call I received a
copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me your fax number.
Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in meeting on
Friday.
Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings agency
level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of the
presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state seeks to
issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:  The Credit Issue
Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start tomorrow's
meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by the
start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the California
PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR gets paid for
power services delivered.
If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:  Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's meeting
the universe of issues that need to be included in a comprehensive solution.
Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive, but a
starting point for discussion.
Utility creditworthiness
retail rates must reflect costs
Increase supply
streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
Decrease demand
establish real-time pricing
implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
Create a real market
Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible (e.g.,
once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to creditworthiness;
approximately 3-6 months)
Return the procurement role to the utilities
Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural gas
Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission, generation,
etc.
Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding that
discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)


Post Date: November 29, 2000
Category: SHORT-TERM FIRM CAPACITY
Subcategory: NWP OFFERS
Subject: 01-074 Soliciting Electronic Bids

Notice Text:

All Shippers Notification: 01-175?????? ??????? ??????? Dated November 30,
2000

TO:???? ALL SHIPPERS

FROM:?? Candace C. Karpakis- (801) 584-6996 wk
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? (801) 971-5983
cellular
??????????????????????????????
????????????????????? Williams Gas Pipeline-West
????????????????????? Northwest Pipeline Transportation

SUBJECT:??????? SOLICITING ELECTRONIC BIDS FOR
AVAILABLE FIRM MAINLINE TRANSPORTATION
CAPACITY ON NORTHWEST'S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

Northwest has posted the following package of available firm TF-1 Large
Customer transportation capacity to its Electronic Bulletin Board ("EBB")
for competitive bid pursuant to the "Right-of-First-Refusal; Posting of
Pipeline Capacity" provision of Northwest's Tariff, which requires
availability of capacity to be posted to the EBB subject to bid.? All
prearranged terms are indicated below, if applicable.? The prearranged
shipper has the right to match the highest economic value at the end of
the bid period.? If the prearranged shipper does not match the highest
economic value, award of such capacity will be made according to
Northwest's tariff.

NOTE:? BIDS FOR POSTED CAPACITY WILL BE CONDUCTED ELECTRONICALLY AS CLOSED
BIDS ON NORTHWEST PIPELINE'S EBB.? Please contact Candace Karpakis or your
Marketing Services Representative if you encounter any problems with your
EBB bid(s).? DON'T WAIT UNTIL THE LAST MINUTE TO POST YOUR BID.? Time
deadlines are electronically monitored and implemented.

PACKAGE "A"
From the November 14, 2000 Posting
EBB OFFER # 449

RECEIPT DELIVERY??????? ?? TOTAL??????? INITIAL PRIMARY PREARRANGED
?POINT? ?? POINT ?????? ??? DTH/D???????? CONTRACT TERM ??????? ???????
OFFER??

Sumas?????? Puget (Canyon)??? 16,000?????? 12/02/00 - 01/31/01? ????????? YES

Min. Acceptable Bid:??? $0.05 per Dth of daily Reservation Contract Demand
for Flexible
?????????????????????????????????????????????? Receipt/Delivery Point Rights
Min. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 1 Dth/d
Max. Acceptable Bid Vol:??????? 16,000 Dth/d
Bid Open Date:? 11/30/00 - (8:00 am Central Time)
Bid Close Date: 12/01/00 - (8:00 am Central Time)
Award Deadline: 12/01/00 - (9:00 am Central Time)
Evergreen:????? ??????? Month to Month, Ten Business Days Notice by Either
Party
Special Terms & Cond:?? See 1, 2 and 3 Below.

SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. The discount rate shall apply to points utilized by the original shipper
entering into
the transportation agreement with Northwest.

2. A shipper will be allowed to release and/or segment and release the
capacity and
shipper and replacement shipper may utilize any available points on
Northwest's
transmission system without impacting the discount for the original shipper.

3. This prearranged offer is for a reservation contract demand rate.? In
addition to the
Reservation Charge Bid, shipper will pay the volumetric charge, the
applicable surcharges and
fuel.
?

PROCEDURE FOR BIDDING FOR
AVAILABLE TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY

The following guidelines will be adhered to for all posted packages of
transportation
capacity for electronic bid ("package or packages"):

1. Shipper must submit a separate electronic bid for each package of
available
transportation capacity.? Multiple electronic bid(s) can be submitted for the
total available
transportation capacity under the specified package OR multiple rates can be
submitted each
for a partial amount of available transportation capacity under the specified
package.? If
the same Shipper submits multiple bids, the highest present value for such
package of
available transportation capacity shall be considered the valid bid. All
other bids from the
same Shipper for the same package of transportation capacity will be
discarded.

2. Northwest awards bids based on a net present value calculation.? If bid
rate is less than
minimum tariff rate, the following formula is utilized:? Bid Rate x FERC
Interest Rate x The
Maximum Bid Quantity x 365 days/100/12; or if the maximum rate is bid, the
following formula
is utilized:? Bid Rate x FERC Interest Rate x Maximum Bid Quantity x days
bid/100. In case
of a tie, each tied shipper will have the right to improve its bid by
submitting an improved
bid within 24 hours of the bid close time.? Such improved bid shall be faxed
to
(801) 584-7076 to Candace Karpakis or Patrick Aman.? If a tie still exists,
such capacity
shall be awarded on a prorata basis.

3. Northwest will not accept bids with a primary contract term (Term) longer
than indicated
for the capacity unless maximum rate is bid.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CREATING A BID FOR
NORTHWEST'S FIRM CAPACITY RELEASE OFFERS

1. Select "CAPACITY RELEASE" application in Northwest Passage.
2. Select "CREATE/SUB BID FOR NWP CAP" application.? All current offers will
appear.
3. Highlight the offer you are interested in by clicking the left mouse
button on the
offer.
4. Select the "TERMS & COND" button at the top of the screen, which is now
active.? The
screen will allow you to review the conditions of the offer.? Close this
screen when you have
finished reviewing.
5. At this point you can review current bids posted for this offer by
selecting the "VIEW
BID" button.? Close this screen when you have finished viewing.
6. If you would like to create a bid for this offer, select "CREATE BID"
button.
7. If you want to bid the maximum rate for the capacity, select the "BID MAX
RATE"
Button.
8. Highlight the "END DATE" if you want to modify the end date of the term of
your offer.
9. If you want to modify the receipt/delivery point maximum and minimum
volume, highlight
the receipt/delivery point section with the left mouse button and modify
accordingly. Select
"SAVE".? If an error appears at the button of the screen, the error will need
to be corrected
and the data will need to be saved again.? If successful, a message will
appear indicating
the bid information has saved and the bid rate must be entered.? Select "OK".
10. Select the "RATE" button.? Enter the bid rate.? Select "SAVE".

???? You have just "CREATED" your bid for the offer.? You now need to
"SUBMIT"
???? your bid as follows:

11. Close out of all screens and return to the "CAPACITY RELEASE" menu
screens.

12. To Submit or Review your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP BID"
button.? All
of your bids will appear.? Highlight the "BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you would
like to submit.
?Select the "SUBMIT" button at the top of the screen to post the bid.

?????? To Withdraw your bid(s), select the "REV/SUB/WDRW NWP CAP" button.?
All of
?????? your bids will appear.? If the bid has not yet been submitted,
highlight the
?????? "BID IN DRAFT STATUS" that you would like to withdraw.? Select the
"WITHDRAW"
?????? button at the top of the screen to withdraw the bid.? After a bid has
been
????? withdrawn, you can select the "DELETE" button at the top of the screen
to
????? delete it from the screen.
????? NOTE:? After each selection, always "REFRESH" the screen to get the
latest status.

Word: F\Short Term/Capacity for Bid-All 2000 November 30, 2000 01-175.doc


Rod:

Thanks so much for taking time from your busy schedule to meet with us last
week. We are extremely excited about the possibility of exploring
partnerships between the Bauer College and Enron and feel that we can do so
to both of our benefits. As we mentioned, we currently have a number of
Centers of Excellence in Energy, Technology Management/eBusiness,
Entrepreneurship and Innovation, and Professional Selling that could
flourish with investments by key business partners such as Enron. We look
forward to discussing these opportunities with you at the appropriate time.

Jerry

Jerry R. Strawser, Interim Dean
Arthur Andersen & Co. Alumni Professor
C.T. Bauer College of Business
University of Houston
Phone: (713) 743-4603
Fax: (713) 743-4622
strawser@uh.edu
www.cba.uh.edu/~jerry


Are we providing testimony to the contrary?

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 02/09/2001 10:50 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: TURN Testimony -- Rate Stabilization Proceeding--Position on End of
Rate Freeze

FYI.  Note that TURN sez that the Commission should use the enactment date of
AB1X as the date that the rate freeze ended.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:52 AM -----

	JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	02/09/2001 10:45 AM

		 To: "'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'" <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>,
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'tjohnso8@enron.com'"
<tjohnso8@enron.com>, "'sstoness@enron.com'" <sstoness@enron.com>,
"'Harry.Kingerski@enron.com'" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "'Gordon Savage
(E-mail)'" <gsavage@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: TURN Testimony -- Rate Stabilization Proceeding

Yesterday (the 8th) was the day for parties to file testimony in the Rate
Stabilization Proceeding.  I have done a quick review of TURN's testimony,
and they did not submit tables which go back and calculate the impact of
adopting its proposed accounting changes on transition cost recovery and the
TRA undercollection balance.  In its testimony, TURN stated that it tried to
do such a calculation, but that the numerous adjustments which the UDCs had
made to their regulatory accounts since last summer made the task alot more
difficult than anticipated.  TURN estimates, however that PG&E's TCBA
balance as of 12/31/01 would be approximately $5.1 billion, while SCE's
would be $2.9 billion.  TURN states that they have requested through a data
request that the UDCs do the tables for them, but that if they do not
comply, that the commission should direct the UDCs to provide the tables.

Also, TURN has taken the position that the enactment of AB X 1 has
effectively ended the rate freeze and the date of the enactment of the
statute  is the one the Commission should pick for purposes of declaring the
rate freeze over.

I have not gone through other parties testimony yet, but wanted to let you
know what TURN has done (or not done).

Jeanne Bennett


SBX 28 (Sher), which would have established expedited siting procedures
among other things, failed passage on the Senate floor today where it
was up for concurrence.  Senate Republicans refused to vote for the bill
because it contained expanded unemployment insurance benefits which were
placed in the bill in the Assembly.  Assembly Republicans voted for the
provisions in exchange for other items in the bill.  Reconsideration was
granted and the bill could be heard by the Senate again as early as
Monday.


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com> on 09/21/2000 06:47:47 AM
To: "'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>,
"'Chad.Landry@enron.com'" <Chad.Landry@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Etiquette - rerun

NIce Man! Especially #10

Blowjob Etiquette For Men, From Women:

> >  1. First and foremost, we are not obligated to do it.
> >
> >   2. Extension to rule #1 - So if you get one, be grateful.
> >
> >   3. I don't care WHAT they did in the porn video you
> >   saw, it is not standard practice to cum on someone's
> >   face.
> >
> >   4. Extension to rule #3 - No, I DON'T have to swallow.
> >
> >   5. My ears are NOT handles.
> >
> >   6. Extension to rule #5 - do not push on the top of
> >   my head. Last I heard, deep throat had been done. And
> >   additionally, do you really WANT puke on your dick?
> >
> >   7. I don't care HOW relaxed you get, it is NEVER OK
> >   to fart.
> >
> >   8. Having my period does not mean that it's "hummer
> >   week" - get it through your head - I'm bloated and I
> >   feel like shit so no, I don't feel particularly obligated
> >   to blow you just because YOU can't have sex right now.
> >
> >   9. Extension to #8 - "Blue Balls" might have worked
> >   on high school girls - if you're that desperate, go
> >   jerk off and leave me alone with my Midol.
> >
> >   10. If I have to pause to remove a pubic hair from my
> >   teeth, don't tell me I've just "wrecked it" for you.
> >
> >   11. Leaving me in bed while you go play video games
> >   immediately afterwards is highly inadvisable if you
> >   would like my behavior to be repeated in the future.
> >
> >   12. If you like how we do it, it's probably best not
> >   to speculate about the origins of our talent. Just enjoy
> >   the moment and be happy that we're good at it. See also
> >   rule #2 about gratitude.
> >
> >   13. No, it doesn't particularly taste good. And I don't
> >   care about the protein content.
> >
> >   14. No, I will NOT do it while you watch TV.
> >
> >   15. When you hear your friends complain about how they
> >   don't get blowjobs often enough, keep your mouth shut.
> >   It is inappropriate to either sympathize or brag.


I just wanted to make sure you guys know everything I do.  Actually this is
somewhat bullish considering past legislative attempts.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2001
03:25 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Keeler
05/24/2001 12:52 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Prentice/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, <Pat
Shortridge@erols.com>, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jim Peterson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Adam
Pollock/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Jacobson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: MTBE legislation

Today, Senators Bob Smith (R-NH) and Harry Reid (D-NV) will introduce an MTBE
bill. which is expected to be slightly different than we've seen in previous
Congresses.

We expect it to include:

1) a 4-year date certain to eliminate MTBE, with EPA determining the phaseout
schedule
2)  a lifting of the 2% oxygenate standard upon perfunctory petition by State
governors within 90 days from date of enactment
3)  and environmental "anti-backsliding" provision focused only on air-toxics
and using a 2000 baseline with a 27.5% percent standard (the way I understand
it right now, RFG must perform 27.5% better than 2000 baseline for
conventional gasoline)
4) provisions for MTBE producer "transition assistance"

Brief analysis:

We'll have more details shortly, but the bill looks a little better than
previous efforts.  A number of bills have been introduced this Congress, but
this will probably be the leading effort.

As you know, Enron has led efforts to include the "transition assistance"
piece -- which is still largely undefined in the legislation -- but we are
pleased with the inclusion of a "placeholder" while the Senate decides on the
best approach.  We will continue to lead the development of such incentives
(which will likely take the form of EPA/DOE funding for MTBE producers who
convert plants to produce iso-octane or alkylate).

An MTBE ban is of course not good, but a "date certain" gives producers more
flexibility to determine their options rather than reduce production under
several steps of a phase out.   Allowing states to get a waiver of the oxy
standard is probably a given in any legislation, but will face some
opposition from the ethanol community -- who just want a simple MTBE ban.

The anti-backsliding provision is still being refined, but looks fairly
lame.  We need more details to make an accurate assessment, but its likely
that environmental groups will want a bit more.

One political factor -- with Sen. Jim Jeffords leaving the Republican party,
Democrats will be given control of the Senate Environment Committee, which
will consider this bill.  They will likely allow Jeffords to chair the
committee.  The significance is that Sen. Bob Smith (R-NH) is the current
chair, and has been able to use that position to drive his past bills on MTBE
-- in losing the chairmanship, his legislation may face a longer road through
Committee.

I will keep you posted as the legislation evolves.

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


Pam,

The term papers arrived at my Internet mailbox.
I shall be sending you the information as I make progress reading the papers.

First group of students:

Helen Demianenko
Javier Lamas
Lynn Nazareth
Shauywn Smith
Carlos Wheelock
Sarah Woody

Grade: A

Please, confirm receipt of this message and please double check
that all registered students have been graded (to make sure no student falls
through
the cracks).

Vince


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020116-DENWC.XLS


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mansfield, Marci
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don
Subject:	NOV TRANS RATES

Don:

The attached file indicates the most current transmission rates and Ancillary fees available for November 2001.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Marci

M:/Electric/East Volume Mgmt/Transmission/Transmission Rates - 11-01


Here's my proposal for how we cover siting issues for Dave P. and Sam W. in
California.  Let me know your response to the discussion and clarify as
necessary.  I want to send this to Dave and Sam ASAP.

Legislative activity:

? Issues that affect generation owners and operators:  We will rely primarily
on IEP and only take a position on legislation or administrative activity
that uniquely affects us.  (Mirant, Southern, AES, etc. have a greater
interest in these issues that we do, given our business plan).  [Model is
legislative and adminstrative effort to change basis for taxing power
plants.]
? Issues that affect siting or project development:  We will rely primarily
on IEP, but will proceed with legislative proposals that have a high value to
Enron.  [Model is the effort that Mike Day has engaged in--i.e., drafting
legislation to consolidate conflicting administrative action on siting, etc.]
? Primary point of contact within Government Affairs:  Susan Mara
? Primary point of contact in Sacramento:  Scott Govenar

Administrative activity--CEC, CARB, etc.:

? Primary point of contact on environmental issues:  Mary Schoen.
? Primary point of contact if high level contacts need to be made within the
agencies:  Susan Mara.  Our lobbyists have the ability to make these high
level contacts on our behalf--particularly the Governmental Advocates firm.
[From time to time it may be necessary to contact the CEC to expedite permit
writing, etc.]

Local agency/community affairs activities:

? Primary point of contact for issues that arise from local concerns that may
require legislation:  Susan Mara.  [Model on this issue is the Williamson Act
legislation.  The issue and solution was identified at the local level.  The
solution required legislation, which was then promoted in Sacramento.  GA
acted to coordinate the efforts.]