Jeff,

We shall forward to you shortly a copy of the message from Sandeep with the
numbers you have
requested.  What follows below are the extracts from two recent articles on
the power situation in India
published by The Financial Times.

The first article describes recent power outage in northern India affecting
millions of people.
One possible line of defense is pointing out to the value of  output lost due
to  power
shortages. It is obvious that the value of lost production exceeds the cost
of power produced
by the Dhabol plant (expensive as it may be). The power cut affected 230
million people.

The second article is Enron specific.

Vince

                     ASIA-PACIFIC: Power failure hits north India
                     Financial Times; Jan 3, 2001
                     By ANGUS DONALD

                     Tens of millions of people were left without electricity
in northern India
                     yesterday after a power grid breakdown.

                     Electricity was gradually switched on in some areas and
most parts of the
                     capital New Delhi, with 60 to 70 per cent of supply
expected to be restored
                     by the end of the day, according to power grid
officials.

                     The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry
(Assocham), a
                     leading business organisation, expressed "deep concern"
and called for a
                     mechanism to prevent future disruption that could
"cripple the economy".

                     The power failure across eight Indian states, including
New Delhi, disrupted
                     train services, water supplies and the telephone network
and forced
                     hospitals to switch to emergency generators.

                     The fault occurred on the Northern Grid, which provides
electricity for 226m
                     people, and affected the states of Delhi, Haryana,
Punjab, Uttar Pradesh,
                     Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Jammu
and Kashmir.

                     A breakdown at a sub-station in Kanpur in Uttar Pradesh,
India's most
                     populous state, caused an overload of power on other
lines, which then
                     failed as well.

                     Trains stopped running for most of the day and signals
systems were
                     damaged. New Delhi international airport was also
slightly affected before
                     its own power supply could be engaged.

                     "We will probe into the reasons for the failure. It is
most likely to be a
                     technical failure, but we will investigate why it
happened," Suresh Prabhu,
                     the power minister, was quoted as saying by Press Trust
of India.

                     India suffers regularly from power problems because of
lack of funding to
                     upgrade infrastructure. Theft of supplies is also a big
problem. Thirty per
                     cent of the country's electricity is stolen, according
to analysts. In New
                     Delhi as much as 50 per cent is stolen.

                     Two years ago, a power failure blacked out Uttar Pradesh
and Delhi for
                     hours.

                     Assocham issued a statement, saying that increasing
industrial demand
                     would exacerbate the problems already faced by India's
inefficient power
                     sector. "The slow progress, particularly in
strengthening the transmission
                     and distribution system, and ever increasing theft will
contribute to
                     worsening the power supply situation further."

                     Copyright: The Financial Times Limited

  , Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2000. "FT" and "Financial Times"
are trademarks of The Financial Times. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions.

******************************************************************************
*************************************

                     ASIA-PACIFIC: Energy group launches image offensive:
Enron has a
                     plan to reverse its reputation as a profiteering
multinational
                     operating in India, writes Khozem Merchant

                     Financial Times; Jan 3, 2001
                     By KHOZEM MERCHANT

                     Enron, the US energy producer and a constant target of
criticism in India, is
                     hitting back with a campaign to reverse its image as a
profiteering
                     multinational.

                     Its "myth and reality" offensive in local newspapers
follows the west Indian
                     state of Maharashtra's decision to review the tariff it
pays the Texas-based
                     company, whose Dollars 2.2bn electricity generating
plant at Dabhol is
                     India's biggest single foreign investment.

                     Maharashtra's tariff has more than doubled since 1993
and is three times
                     greater than that charged by other independent power
producers (IPPs).
                     The tariff has risen because of the depreciation of the
rupee against the
                     dollar and the high but now falling price of naphtha
fuel. The state also pays
                     a fixed capacity charge of Rs970m (Dollars 21m) a month,
reflecting the
                     huge project cost and, controversially, irrespective of
consumption.

                     A showdown looks inevitable, reminiscent of a clash six
years ago that
                     damaged India's appeal to foreign investors. A former
official of the World
                     Bank, which has criticised the deal, says Enron is
emerging "as the East
                     India Company of the 21st century" - a reference to the
British trader that
                     colonised key areas of the Indian economy in the 19th
century.

                     The stand-off is the latest blot on India's power
sector. The UK's PowerGen
                     and Cogentrix of the US have quit India recently,
frustrated by long approval
                     procedures, inadequate payments mechanisms or because of
higher
                     returns elsewhere.

                     "India has lost time and opportunity and has driven
returns down by six
                     percentage points," says Gerry Grove-White, former India
general manager
                     of PowerGen, which has sold its 655MW plant in Gujarat
to China Light &
                     Power of Hong Kong.

                     India's national plan for the five years to 2002 says
generating capacity
                     must rise by 40,000MW to about 120,000MW. But since
1992, IPPs have
                     added only 3,000MW and 2,500MW remains under
construction. This is
                     insufficient to support official projections of 6 to 8
per cent economic
                     growth.

                     Enron was a bellwether of India's liberalisation,
winning fast-track project
                     approval in the early 1990s. Phase 1, a 740MW plant
fuelled by expensive
                     naphtha came on stream in May 1999, and phase 2, a
Dollars 1.87bn plant
                     of 1,624MW capacity that will run on cheaper liquefied
natural gas (LNG),
                     will be completed this year. Only two of seven other
fast-track proposals
                     have achieved financial closure.

                     From the outset Enron encountered attacks, culminating
in Maharashtra's
                     then nationalist government cancelling the project
before renegotiating
                     terms no less onerous. Vilasrao Deshmukh, chief minister
of the successor
                     government, says the power purchase agreement is
unaffordable.

                     Enron, whose attackers also include cultural
chauvinists, wants to maintain
                     good political relations in a hostile but lucrative
environment. Enron views
                     India as a testing ground for its evolution from a
traditional manager of
                     power plants to a broad-based trader of commodities,
such as energy, gas
                     and bandwidth.

                     To support these ambitions Enron hopes to trade energy
between power
                     surplus and deficit states, once legislation is passed
this year. It is building
                     an LNG terminal and pipelines to trade imported natural
gas. And it is
                     laying a 15,000km fibre-optic network to trade bandwidth
space in a country
                     desperately short of this new economy commodity.

                     In any event, Enron believes it has a watertight
contract. It is supported by
                     many that believe any subversion of the contract would
confirm investor
                     perception of Maharashtra, India's financial and
industrial hub, as an
                     unreliable destination for investment.

                     Mr Deshmukh - who has avoided the language of his
predecessor, which
                     threatened to "dump Dabhol into the Arabian Sea" - is
under pressure from
                     radical members of his wobbly coalition. But his options
are limited.
                     Scrapping the project would be ruinous for an
economically troubled state
                     that would have to compensate shareholders.

                     Maharashtra State Electricity Board, the local utility
and Enron's main
                     client, is obliged to dispatch or "off-take" 90 per cent
of Dabhol's output. Yet
                     MSEB has never honoured these guarantees. Its off-take
has averaged 60
                     per cent since the plant opened and, in effect, MSEB has
been paying a lot
                     more while consuming a lot less power.

                     One reason off-take is low is because the state's tough
new regulator has
                     told MSEB to buy from cheaper sources. Enron says the
tariff would be
                     Rs4.02/kWh if MSEB's off-take averaged 90 per cent. But
with off-take a
                     third lower, the average tariff is Rs4.94 per unit, and
often higher. In
                     October, the tariff was Rs6.91 per unit, when off-take
was about 49 per
                     cent. Enron says tariffs should come down when phase 2,
run on cheaper
                     LNG, starts.

                     These cost pressures have forced MSEB to take up only
half of a 30 per
                     cent equity option in phase 2. Enron has acquired the
balance and
                     mandated bankers to find a buyer.

                     Enron's difficulties have undermined the appeal of IPPs,
which have failed to
                     deliver the flood of investments. Potential IPPs feared
they would never be
                     paid by state generating boards that have become a
byword for corrupt
                     management of power.

                     Reform of state electricity boards, whose uneconomic
pricing means
                     industrial users subsidise poor farmers, as well as
transmission and
                     distribution (T&D) services to check huge theft and
technical losses, is
                     overdue. "Given the limited resources, money would be
better spent on T&D
                     rather than on new plant," says Oliver Blackaby,
managing director of N M
                     Rothschild in India, which is advising Karnataka on the
privatisation of its
                     distribution network.

                     For the moment, attention is fixed on Enron's ability to
satisfy the
                     competing interests of investors and clients. As Sanjay
Bhatnagar, chief
                     executive officer of Enron India, said in a recent trade
magazine, one of the
                     key lessons learned from phase 2 is "having flexibility
to deal with
                     externalities".

                     Copyright: The Financial Times Limited

  , Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2000. "FT" and "Financial Times"
are trademarks of The Financial Times. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions.


The International Bar Association Section on Energy & Natural Resources Law and the Section of Business Law Utility Committee presents, the Sixth Electricity Conference.   The conference "Restructuring Revisited: Has Electricity Reform Gone Awry? will be held on February 25-26, 2002, at the Claremont Resort and Spa in Berkeley, California.

This conference will focus on the challenges that electricity restructuring initiatives are facing in different regions of the Americas, with special emphasis on the recent experiences in California and other parts of the USA, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and Canada.

It will examine the implementation of advanced restructuring concepts on governments, regulators and power industries, as well as the implications of future electricity restructuring, reform and privatisation initiatives around the world.

Here are the titles of the sessions that will be presented:
* The Current Status of Electricity Restructuring and Reform: Where are Electricity Markets Going? A Global View
* California: A Case Study
* Experiences in Restructuring from Latin America
* Implementing Electricity Restructurings: Specific Lessons from California and Abroad
* Expanding Supply: The Tension Between Facility Expansion and Environmental Protection
* Protecting Competition in Restructured Markets: New Challenges for Regulation and Antitrust/Competition Law Enforcement
* Governing, Managing and Regulating Through Crisis: Lessons from California and Elsewhere: Panel Discussion

To get the complete program schedule and to obtain registration information, visit the meetings and events page on the EBA website by clicking on the link below.

<http://www.eba-net.org/meetings.htm>


Tana:

When attempting to access the link you sent below I was unsuccessful.  In
speaking with IT, they indicated that I need to know the server that the
below database is on in order to be able to launch this database.  I did
indicate to IT that it was a lotus notes application.  If you can look on
your lotus notes icon for the below database link and tell me if the server
is NAHOU or ECTHOU that would help us out a lot.  Or I don't mind coming to
your work location and looking at the icon myself on your pc to determine the
information that I need in order to launch the database.

Thanks.

Shemeika
X52552

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:32 AM
To: Lowry, Donna; Landry, Shemeika S.; Smith, Shelli
Subject: lotus notes link

Link --> << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 08:31 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton 06/01/2001 08:22 AM 	   To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: lotus notes link

Tana:  The following people have requested a link;

Donna Lowry
Shemeika Landry
Shelli Smith

Shemeika and Shelli work with Donna in risk analytics.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Wattage Monitor is a service that helps electricity customers find a
competitive electric supplier to help lower their bills. To SDG&E customers,
they are offering a choice of 14 companies to buy their electric power.

http://www.wattagemonitor.com

Wattage Monitor Service Teams Help Lower Electric Bills

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 21 /PRNewswire/ -- As summer temperatures continue to
heat up and electricity prices do the same, Wattage Monitor Inc.
(OTC Bulletin Board: WMON) offers consumers an escape by locating a
competitive supplier that can lower their bills.
    Customers of San Diego Gas & Electric can choose to buy electric power
from 14 other companies besides their regulated utility.  Most of these
competing companies allow Wattage Monitor system users to switch to their
service automatically.  And there are savings to be had.  In some cases
competing suppliers are offering as much as $120 per year in savings or more.
    "With the surge in power prices has come great interest in saving on
electric bills," notes Gerald R. Alderson, President of Wattage Monitor.  "In
response we have expanded our service, sent consumer service teams to
San Diego to help consumers choose a supplier and have made it easier to
switch on-line at http://www.wattagemonitor.com or through our toll-free
service
reached by calling 1-888-WATTAGE," he added.
    The California electricity market is in a significant transition from a
regulated market to a competitive one.  But like telephone long-distance
service, a consumer must switch to a competing supplier to lower their bill.
As consumers increasingly become aware that they have a choice and switch,
competition is expected to produce even greater savings.  But consumers must
act to realize the savings available.
    Wattage Monitor is a nationwide, free to consumers service that offers
residential and commercial electric consumers their specific electric service
options through its website http://www.wattagemonitor.com or its toll-free
service
888-WATTAGE.  Consumers may also easily and conveniently enroll with the
supplier of their choice.  Competing electric suppliers' rates and services
are posted by zip code.  Simple, straightforward, comparative and all in one
place.

SOURCE Wattage Monitor Inc.
Web Site: http://www.wattagemonitor.com


Stephanie:  Please see me so that we can finalize.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 08:15 AM -----

	"Weiss, Richard" <rweiss@lehman.COM>
	12/01/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>, "Rosica,
Paul" <prosica@lehman.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Master Agreement

Sara:

All of your comments in regard to the guarantee are fine.  I am enclosing a
copy of the legal opinion that we will provide.

 <<LBF-Opinion5.doc>>

Please forward an execution copy of the master agreement.  We are ready to
sign.

regards,
Richard

 - LBF-Opinion5.doc


TSWG Meeting notes for 8/23/00

Participants:
Scheduling Coordinators - Altra, SCE, CDWR, PGE, Riverside, Southern,
Midway, Dynegy, PX, Reliant, NCPA, & more.
ISO - Darren Lamb, Ginger Seitles, Greg Ford, Eddie Ledesma, Mark Rothleder,
CP Ng, Jim Blatchford.

Settlement Dispute System (SDS):

Not implemented yet.

Automated Dispatch System (ADS):

The ADS Query File Data Dictionary was released this week. ADS client 26 was
released 8/23. Features include Query data which now contain decimals
instead of integer values and system performance improvement by limiting
queries to 7 days worth of data at a time. A question was raised about what
time standard is used for instructions. Greg Ford responded it is PDT/PST.

RMR Scheduling:

No comments

10-Minute Settlement:

The API parser had corrections made. The Ex-Post price fix (looking for 6
values instead of 1) has been implemented and is working. Also the
supplemental energy import parsing order was corrected. The Beep_Gen_Full
template does successfully parse through the existing parser. Ginger Seitles
is working with SCE to correct the localized parser problem. The question
was raised if there may be only one record supporting two charge types. CP
responded that for CTs 401/407 there is, and can be, one record supporting
multiple charge types. A question was raised concerning instructions being
over lapped to the next day. Mark responded that there are no instructions
that are issued to last over a day. Mark also reminded everyone that
effective June 1st that the ISO stated using ramping energy versus block
energy for dispatches. He also reminded all that residual energy would be in
effect on September 1st.  The PX asked if there were DC loss calculation
available for the market simulation information. CP stated that there was
and would forward it on to the PX. It is also planned to publish the
implementation schedule the week of 8/28.

InterSC Trades of Adjustment Bids:

The implementation target date for Inter-SC Trade Adjustment Bid has been
delayed until the first week of October 1, 2000. A new schedule has been
published. A training class has been tentatively scheduled for September
19th . Details to follow.

OASIS Redesign:

Darren Lamb explained that the project is progressing satisfactorily. He is
still anticipating a market testing in late October with full implementation
in mid-December. A concerned was raised about the amount of time, if any was
being allotted for overlapping of templates.

Dual Invoicing:

Everyone was reminded that the first preliminary invoices were coming out
8/24.

Other:

A request was made (after the TSWG call) to change the time of the call to
1330 PDT to accommodate those in the Eastern Time zone.  Comments are
requested.

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


For the week  October 30th-November 3rd:

Transwestern weekly average deliveries to California were 824 MMcf/d (76%)
while east deliveries averaged 341 MMcf/d.  San Juan lateral throughput
averaged 800 MMcf/d while receipts from Rio Puerco averaged 10 MMcf/d.

El Paso average deliveries to California were 2,328 MMcf/d (79%) :

- PG&ETop (capacity 1,140 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 582 MMcf/d (51%)
- SoCalEhr (capacity 1,246 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 1,209 MMcf/d (97%)
- SoCalTop (capacity 549 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 535 MMcf/d (99%)

Other pipeline throughput:

- PGT ( capacity 1,974 MMcf/d) throughput to California averaged 1,625 MMc/d
(82%)
-  Kern River (capacity 700) throughput to California averaged 315 MMcf/d
(45%)

The cash PG&E/Topock - SoCal/Needles spread averaged .11 for the week.

Friday Enron Online Basis numbers:
  Dec  Dec 00-March '01 April-Oct '01
Perm-CA   .60       .44      .64
SJ - CA    .71    .57      .95
SJ-Waha   .15    .20      .38
Perm-Waha   .04    .04      .07


Daren -

-FYI-

Exxon supply at Mobil Cayanosa has fallen off due to problems, so starting
9/9 there nom will go from 5.000  down to .520 and going at least through the
weekend 9/11.  Stacey has already bought gas from Duke to resupply (the
difference 4.480) Midlothian at Duke Pegasus, in addition to the 8.600
incremental she bought there.  So for the weekend, we should have a sale to
Midlothian of 13,080 at Pegasus.

---Mark
x33396


Rex,

If i am no longer a section 16 officer, do i need to be removed from this
list?  What is the status?

Thanks,
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
07:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Rebecca Carter@ENRON on 09/26/2000 01:13 PM
Sent by: Kelly Johnson@ENRON
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, rpmark5@hotmail.com@Azurix, Ken
Harrison/ENRON@Gateway, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Young/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J Mark
Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marsha Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX,
Dolly Henrici/ENRON@Gateway, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy Young/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie
Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue
Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Bobbie
Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Form 4 Reminder for September 2000


<<Revised NDA - Lehman Brothers Inc.>> Your message

  To:      Kimmel, Scott
  Cc:      Travis.McCullough@enron.com
  Subject: Revised NDA - Lehman Brothers Inc.
  Sent:    Wed, 9 May 2001 10:17:11 -0400

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Kimmel, Scott on Wed, 9 May 2001 10:17:39 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:EXAMNYC:EXNYC08

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers Inc.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to
be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <OFA2E8B989.9D0CF15E-ON86256A47.004E2DEA@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: "Kimmel, Scott" <sckimmel@lehman.com>
cc: Travis.McCullough@enron.com
Subject: Revised NDA - Lehman Brothers Inc.
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 10:17:11 -0400
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=iso-8859-1


I will be out of the office from 07/17/2000 until 07/24/2000.

I will be checking email & voice mail regularly, but if you need to contact
me I can be reached by mobile phone at (281)-788-0243.  If it is an
emergency, please contact the Notes Development Group at 3-6929.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2001 02:56 PM -----

	John Malowney/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/14/2001 09:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: ISDA

Sara, some time ago we forwarded Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) an ISDA for their
review and consideration.  They have responded with the following comments.
Can you give me a hand in addressing them?  John

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Roger Dieringer" <Roger.Dieringer@LPCorp.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Roger+20Dieringer+22+20+3CRoger+2EDieringer+40LPCorp+2Ec
om+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Malowney, John
Subject: ISDA

John,

Listed  below are several issues we need to have addressed prior to signing
the  agreement!

1)  Curt Stevens name is consistently  misspelled throughout the documents.
We should also be sure that our new  corporate address is used.  805 SW
Broadway, Suite 1200,  Portland, Oregon 97205-3303.

2)  Enron doesn't like late payments or early termination of their
agreements.  Interest on amounts owing is compounded daily.  John - this
needs to be changed.  What other decent  arrangements can be put in here.  (I
thought only loan sharks compounded  daily?)

3)  Part 3 of the Schedule to the Master Agreement should be amended to
provide that  LP may satisfy its obligation to provide updated financial
information by  posting it to EDGAR or on the web. Enron now has that
ability.

4) We  don't have the 1991 ISDA Definitions or the 1993 ISDA Commodity
Derivatives  Definitions cited in Parts 5 and 6 of the Schedule to the Master
Agreement. I  wasn't able to locate them on the web. We will need these
provide  to LP.

5) The  Credit Support Annex is designed to apply to ISDA Agreements subject
to New York  law. Our Agreement is subject to Texas law. We may not have  the
proper form.

Let me know at your convenience.

Thanks
Roger


Please change the demand fee on deal 157288 for 8/00 from $9,575.45 to
$6,143.64.  We need to reduce our payment to Duke.  When I adjusted the over
delivery charge on the days we didn't nom,  the demand amount changed.  I
waited until Duke agreed before I sent you this change.

Thanks,
Megan


---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 01/30/2001 12:39
PM ---------------------------

Doug Imrie@ECT
01/24/2001 11:06 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Indian Contracts

Please find attached a copy of the indian contracts report.

D


(See attached file: HPLN1122.xls)

 - HPLN1122.xls


Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
February 6, 2001 8 A.M. Edition

STATES
ARIZONA -- Bill would end antitrust exemption for competitive services
CONN. -- DPUC nixes service reclassification, OKs rest of Verizon `alt
reg' plan
TEXAS -- Counties would gain authority over wireless telecom facilities
under bill
TENNESSEE -- Bill would limit utilities' charges for pole attachments
NORTH DAKOTA -- Legislators fight extension of Internet tax moratorium
OREGON -- House OKs digital signature bill
MICHIGAN -- Local calling areas to become larger for Ameritech, Verizon
customers
KENTUCKY -- PSC plans meeting to discuss `N11' pricing issues
ILLINOIS -- Rep. Franks takes aim at telemarketers
MISSISSIPPI -- Internet child protection bills advance
ARIZONA -- Bill would change excise tax that funds emergency telecom
services

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
ARIZONA
Bill would end antitrust exemption for competitive services

The Arizona Legislature is considering a bill that would remove any
competitive telecom service from an exemption of the Uniform State
Antitrust Act.  Current law exempts any conduct or activity of a public
service corporation holding a certification of public convenience and
necessity from the Act.

The staff of the Democratic Caucus explained to TR that HB 2447 would
apply only to competitive services, not to the companies as a whole.
For example, the bill would affect services like Caller ID, call
waiting, and three-way calling.

The staff added that a similar bill that passed last year that removed
competitive electricity generation service from the antitrust exemption.

HB 2447, which was introduced by Rep. Bill Brotherton (D., District 20),
awaits consideration by the House Energy, Utilities, and Technology
Committee, the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee, and
the House Rules Committee.

ALTERNATIVE REGULATION
CONNECTICUT
DPUC nixes service reclassification, OKs rest of Verizon `alt reg' plan

The Department of Public Utility Control has approved Verizon New York,
Inc.'s revised proposed alternative regulation plan on the condition
that the company remove certain service reclassification provisions.

Connecticut law requires an incumbent local exchange carrier's (ILEC's)
services to be classified as competitive, noncompetitive, or
emerging-competitive.  Verizon had proposed that all new services and
new service packages offered during the plan would be "proposed as
competitive, subject to the department's acceptance."  Verizon also
suggested designating its toll service offerings as competitive because
the department already has classified such services as competitive for
the Southern New England Telephone Co. (SNET), the state's other ILEC.

The DPUC said the statute requires specific notice and hearing
procedures before it can change the classification of an ILEC's
service.  The department decided it couldn't roll the statutory
reclassification procedure into its tariff procedures.

Turning to the reclassification of toll services, the department said
that "although Verizon's presence in Connecticut is dwarfed by SNET's
presence," Verizon is the incumbent telco in its two territories and
"arguably maintains the same presence as SNET when compared to
competitive local exchange companies."  The DPUC concluded that Verizon
can't use its revised "alt reg" plan to "circumvent" the statutory
reclassification requirements.  It also concluded that Verizon hadn't
provided any evidence detailing the status and level of competition in
its territories.

The department found the rest of the plan acceptable, including the
elimination of the $2.07 touch tone charge for residential customers,
representing a $830,000 revenue reduction over the 3-year life of the
plan.  The revised plan also commits Verizon to previously established
service-quality requirements.

The department told Verizon to resubmit the plan, minus the service
reclassification provisions, by Feb. 15.  (Docket no. 99-03-06,
Application of the New York Telephone Co. for Alternative Regulation)

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
TEXAS
Counties would gain authority over wireless telecom facilities under
bill

Rep. Robert Cook (D., District 28) has introduced a bill that would give
counties authority to regulate wireless communications facilities,
including collocated or shared facilities.  HB 1148 would allow the
counties to require companies to seek permits for constructing,
expanding, or removing a tower or other facility.  The bill also would
authorize the counties to impose fees to cover the cost of regulating
the facilities.

The counties would be able to regulate the height, lighting, location,
and removal of the towers or other facilities.  HB 1148 additionally
establishes a set of procedures a person must complete before
constructing a wireless communications facility.

FUTURE OF REGULATION
TENNESSEE
Bill would limit utilities' charges for pole attachments

Sen. William C. Clabough (R., District 8) has introduced SB 1217 to
restrict the amount utilities could request or receive from telephone
companies or cable TV providers for attaching facilities to the
utilities' poles.  Utilities would have to comply with SB 1217 and other
applicable laws in granting permission for pole attachments.

The bill also would require utilities to offer access to their poles and
conduits located in public rights-of-way to any telephone company or
cable TV provider that requested such access.  Utilities could deny
requests for pole attachments only if access wasn't technically viable.
Telephone companies and cable TV providers that were refused permission
to attach facilities to a utility's poles could file a lawsuit for a
declaratory judgment or injunction, or both.

The bill's text is available at
http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/bills/currentga/BILL/SB1217.pdf.

INTERNET
NORTH DAKOTA
Legislators fight extension of Internet tax moratorium

A resolution introduced in the House would urge the U.S. Congress to
reject any attempt to extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act's moratorium
on state and local taxes on Internet access and electronic commerce
transactions.  The moratorium expires Oct. 21.

Reps. Francis Wald (R., District 37), George Keiser (R., District 47),
and Mike Timm (R., District 5) and Sens. Judy Lee (R., District 13), Tim
Mathern (D., District 11), and Herb Urlacher (R., District 36)
introduced HCR 3012.

INTERNET
OREGON
House OKs digital signature bill

The House has approved a bill to require the Department of
Administrative Services to adopt rules for the use of digital signature
by state agencies.  HB 2040 would require the adoption of rules to
ensure adequate integrity, security, and confidentiality of state agency
e-commerce transactions.  The rules also would need to ensure that
transactions could be audited.

The Joint Legislative Committee on Information Management and Technology
requested the introduction of HB 2040 on behalf of the Oregon Internet
Commission.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT
MICHIGAN
Local calling areas to become larger for Ameritech, Verizon customers

The Public Service Commission yesterday determined that local calling
area should be defined as the "home exchange to which a customer's local
access line is assigned as specified in the maps and boundary
descriptions of the incumbent local telephone service provider's
tariffs."

The commission adopted the definition pursuant to a provision of a
recent amendment to the Michigan Telecommunications Act.  (7/7/00 p.m.)
The provision requires calls made to calling areas adjacent to the
caller's local calling area to be considered and billed as local calls.

The PSC determined that the statutory provision doesn't create a new
service and thus prohibits setting a rate for expanded local calling as
a new service.  Carriers must charge the same rate that they have been
charging for local calls.  They may make adjustments in customers'
access areas (and thus the associated access charges) or rate groups for
basic local exchange service.

The commission's order is available at
http://cis.state.mi.us/cgi-bin/mpsc/vieworder.cgi?filename=/mpsc/orders/comm/2
001/u-12515b.htm.
(Case nos. U-12515, U-12528)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
KENTUCKY
PSC plans meeting to discuss `N11' pricing issues

The Public Service Commission has scheduled a Feb. 13 conference with
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet to
discuss pricing issues related to "N11" abbreviated dialing codes.
Specifically, the PSC intends to address the proposed contract between
Cincinnati Bell and the Transportation Cabinet for converting access to
travel and information services from the "211" code to "511" code.  In
addition, Cincinnati Bell will be expected to defend its proposed price
for providing 511 service to the cabinet.

In November 1997 the PSC required Cincinnati Bell to allocate the 211
dialing code to the cabinet for a trial period.  Then, in July 2000 the
FCC ruled that the 511 dialing code should be used for travel
information.  Last fall the PSC assigned the 511 dialing code in
Cincinnati Bell's service area to the state's transportation cabinet to
serve as a travel and safety information service.  (11/1/00 a.m.)

In January the PSC reopened its investigation into the allocation of N11
dialing codes in response to BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.'s Dec.
11, 2000, filing of tariffs to provide 511, 211, and "711" services.
(1/16/01 a.m.)

(Administrative case no. 343 - In the Matter of Investigation into the
Assignment of Abbreviated N11 Dialing Codes)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
ILLINOIS
Rep. Franks takes aim at telemarketers

Rep. Jack D. Franks (D., Woodstock) has introduced HB 570 to require
telemarketers to register with the attorney general, obtain a surety
bond, and maintain certain business records.  The measure would require
the AG to charge "reasonable" application and renewal fees.

Telemarketers would have to disclose their identity, purpose for
calling, and the nature of the goods or services being offered during a
telephone solicitation.  They would have to provide written notice to
customers 10 days after completing a sale.

The AG would have the authority to enforce any provisions of the
legislation as an unawful act under the state's Consumer Fraud and
Deceptive Business Practices Act.

INTERNET
MISSISSIPPI
Internet child protection bills advance

Two bills that aim to protect children from sexual exploitation over the
Internet have passed their first hurdles in the Legislature.  HB 1140,
introduced by Rep. Jamie Franks Jr. (D., District 19), has passed the
House.  The bill would ban the use of the Internet to transport visual
depictions of children engaging in sexually explicit acts.  (1/22/01
a.m.)

SB 2146, sponsored by Sen. Terry C. Burton (D., District 31), has
cleared the Senate.  The bill would prohibit using the Internet to
distribute "indecent materials" with the intent of seducing a minor.
(1/23/01 a.m.)

NETWORK MANAGEMENT
ARIZONA
Bill would change excise tax that funds emergency telecom services

Sen. Susan Gerard (R., District 18) has introduced a bill that would
alter the tax levied to fund the state emergency telecom services fund.
SB 1504 would levy a tax of 37.5 cents per month for each activated
wireline and wireless service account.

Under current law, the tax on wireline carriers is a percentage of their
gross proceeds, and wireless carriers are assessed a flat tax.  SB 1504
awaits consideration by the Senate Finance Committee and the Senate
Rules Committee.

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


This is a copy of your message sent to travellingchick@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I was surfing through the pictures on this web site and ran across yours.  I found you to be attractive and your profile to be interesting.  I sent along mine so you can take a look and see if there is any interest.  I hope there is and that I hear from you later.

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=0

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


Mark wanted me to send this to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

Meredith Philipp
03/22/2000 01:25 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann M
Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Important

Can we please order this stamp?
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 03/22/2000
01:20 PM ---------------------------

Kristen_Bumgardner@spc.com on 03/16/2000 10:29:26 AM
To: ama@dn.zhgm.com, elizabeth_brewer@foleys.com, meredith_philipp@enron.com,
Robin_Etka@spc.com
cc:

Subject: FUNNY!

--------------- cc:Mail Forwarded ---------------
From:     "Rebecca Hollas" <rhollas@darlinghomes.com> AT TIME_INC
Date:     03/16/2000 12:18 PM
To:       Kristen Bumgardner AT TIBHSPC3
To:       "Laura Slough" <lslough@darlinghomes.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Maureen (E-mail)" <mblair@lennar.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Ashley (E-mail)" <ashham64@hotmail.com> AT TIME_INC
To:       "Shell (E-mail)" <Shelvis59@yahoo.com> AT TIME_INC
Subject:  FUNNY!

 - Stamp.jpg


OK that whole bra comment...MEAN!  You know I'm sensitive about my little breasts!  I've been working on the girls about the limo.  I think they're coming around.  It would be much less expensive to go the limo way in my opinion.  Plus, I'm not crazy about running around in the cold since I  won't be wearing much!

----- Original Message -----
From: Lucci, Paul T. <mailto:Paul.T.Lucci@ENRON.com>
To: lisab <mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:38 AM
Subject: RE: halloween

What parties are you going to.  I've got two parties and a band I want tos ee.  Cabs are too expensive.  Figure out where you guys want to go and then let's talk.  What are you going as, hopefully cat woman in as kin-tight cat suit.  So you better pad your bra!

-----Original Message-----
From: lisab [mailto:lisab@int.iwhm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: halloween

Update!  Jeff the DUI guy wants to party, so no go on the driving.  Like I guessed, Nat and Lorena are going to pass on the limo.  So, taxi is probably the best bet.  We're meeting at Nat's place in the early evening to "get ready" and then planning to hit the bars and maybe a couple of parties.  Are you going to join us?   Do you know of anything going on?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


All deals done into FUGG should be papered to CMS Field Services.  Once the gas passes beyond GlenRock physically, the entity will change to CMS M,S & T.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:05 AM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Cc:	Riordan, Sean
Subject:	CMS Field Services - 09/01 prod

Paul,

Deal # 1022414 with CMS Marketing, Services, & Trading for Sep production gas sales on FUGG has you listed as the deal maker or contact.  Both CMS Marketing, Services, &Trading and CMS Field Services, Inc. Settlements groups believe this deal was actually made with CMS Field Services, Inc.  Therefore, I believe this deal needs to be changed to reflect the correct counterparty name.  Please advise or change as necessary.

Furthermore, deal # 1020432 for Sep production gas sales on FUGG has the same problem.  I cannot determine whether you are the deal maker on this deal, but it requires a similar change to CMS Field Services, Inc.  Both deals are Denver deals.

Please let me know if you have questions or when this is complete.

Sean - Please add anything where possible.

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Client Services - Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com


As requested, attached is the final Agreement which I believe reflects the
revisions we discussed this morning.  If this is acceptable, please have
the Agreement executed on behalf of Enron and return the necessary
counterparts to me for signature by Chase.  I will then return fully
executed copies to you.
(See attached file: Enron.doc)
 - Enron.doc


Subject:
Dreaded Lists

---------------------------------

Alright, it is beginning, I need to receive from all parties the lists for
the wedding/ engagement party. I'm not sure what ettiquette is appropriate,
i.e. if people invited to the engagement party are automatic guests at the
wedding, but I plan on buying the book, whatever it may be. However, I would
like to receive your lists, including family, with addresses so Jose Luis and
I can start composing a master list. He is doing the same with his parents. I
know, Dad and Linda, you are in the middle of moving and giong out of town,
etc. but I can start with Mark and Natalie's list and then change as needed.
Thanks,
Love,
Liz and Jose Luis


You got it.  Just give me a call and we'll walk through "the other side of
the story."

Best,
Jeff

	Rob Bradley
	04/20/2001 03:17 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Can I talk you or someone else who is close to this into a one pager on why
a simple supply/demand explanation of California border prices trumps
Carpenter's El Paso dun it conspiracy analysis?

I don't want Lay to be stumped by a question on this at his Wednesday IAEE
talk.

- Rob

----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 03:13 PM -----

	Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/20/2001 02:51 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FW: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Attached is Paul Carpenter (Brattle Group) preliminary findings that
marketers have market power at the border.

By my second email I'm sending Enron's responses to the pleadings at FERC
which refute the notion of the need to reinstitute price controls at the
California border.

Alternatively, a good argument to high gas prices at the CA border is the
message in Stan's natural gas roundtable speech (i.e. high gas prices can be
directly attributed to supply/demand factors).

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Gomez, Julie A.; Corman,
Shelley; Hartsoe, Joe; Miller, Stephanie; Steffes, James; skean@enron.com;
Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; McCubbin,
Sandra; Guerrero, Janel; Denne, Karen; mpalmer@enron.com; Novosel, Sarah;
Fulton, Donna; Lawner, Leslie
Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

FYI.  Presentation by Brattle Group before CA leg committee yesterday in
which they assert market power at the CA border (held by "out-of-state
suppliers") explains high gas prices in California.  If you have any
questions, call me at 415.782.7822.  Please forward to others whom you think
might be interested.  Stephanie, could you forward along to Barry?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 12:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com 04/19/2001 11:36 AM 	   To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc:   Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2000 11:12
AM ---------------------------

Frances Ortiz
01/07/2000 02:54 PM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Trisha lunch

Jeff has approved for her to be added for lunch everyday and bodweek

thanks
fso


Ann,

Can you check on the palo alto confirms for deals that were done around the 20th of July?  I think there are about three confirms they have not received and Karla at Palo Alto is going to get in trouble internally.

thanks,

Kim Ward


pls print for my Tues. am mtg in Houston.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/14/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

Gail Tholen@ECT
05/12/2000 01:24 PM
To: John Allario/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Bieniawski/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garry D
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Gas Storage Deal Structure Working Notes for LRC

I just wanted to clarify a few points mentioned in this diagram:

1.  The reason that gain recognition may be precluded under the equity sell
down if Enron maintains a guarantee is because guarantees are considered
"continuing involvement" under FAS 66 : Sale of Real Estate.  We would
essentially own an interest in an asset which is considered real estate (per
accounting rules). By maintaining a guarantee, Enron has not given up all of
the risks and rewards of ownership and therefore true sale treatment would be
precluded.

2.  The lease versus executory contract  debate is centered around the nature
of the offtake agreement coupled with our involvement in the project.
Involvement that requires us to take operational risk coupled with taking
capacity leans toward a lease.  However, each deal is different and there
isn't a bright line test for determining lease vs. executory; although, it
certainly looks better if our offtake is minimal.  As well, LD language
should not only be present but should be significant or market based.  In
addition, the contract should not mention the storage facility, only that
capacity will be provided.  Determining whether we are in a lease versus and
executory contract is based on a preponderance of the evidence (more facts
pointing toward executory contract versus lease).

3.  In the General Notes section, you mention the Trust being funded by all
debt and contribution to the project being considered equity.  I'm unsure
where this conclusion was reached.  This is not something I believe we fully
discussed.  Whether of not it can be funded by all debt is something I will
have to digest and get back to you about.   How much money is coming in
through the investment trust?  From the diagram is looks like Enron ownership
would be 30% instead of 12% if that piece is considered debt.  30% ownership
does not necessarily lead to consolidation of Project Co. LLC.

4.  Two more items of interest that we did not discuss are our Affiliate
Rules and FAS 98 Sale Leaseback.  Under our affiliate rules, if the capacity
contract is deemed an executory contract and qualifies for MTM Accounting, we
can only mark the portion of the contract we do not own.  So long as we
maintain a 12% interest, we could probably only MTM 88% of the contract.
However, there is debate in this area depending on our level of "control".
Affiliate rules normally cover greater than 20% ownership investments unless
we exert significant influence.  I believe we will be in control of the
structure.  This will require more discussion later.

-FAS 98 Sale Leaseback is not a good place to be but is something to keep in
mind.  However, we can be proactive and work toward keeping ourselves out
lease land and structure this as and executory contract.

Per my request, please allow me sometime to digest this structure and consult
with my colleagues.  I will be in touch.

	From:  John Allario                           05/11/2000 06:54 PM

To: Paul Bieniawski/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garry D
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew Fossom, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enron Gas Storage Deal Structure Working Notes for LRC

Team

I have summarized in the margins of our DRAFT deal structure the "high level"
issues that Gail Tholen, Jin and I discussed on Thursday.   These are
preliminary guidelines and as our deal evolves and our partner's desires
change, we will have to potentially address completely different accounting,
regulatory and tax issues.     We hope to touch on some of the issues that
this structure may raise from a Regulatory perspective with Drew Fossom when
we meet next Tuesday at 10:00AM.

Please comment and advise as you see fit.

Thanks

-John


okey dokey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: Dynegy CA

I am coming over in a minute to look at the Northwestern Closing Binder.  If you want, I will stop by Kay's office.

K-

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject:	RE: Dynegy CA

I would like to see it before we send them anything.  I'll ask Kay for it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:37 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Rorschach, Reagan
Subject:	Dynegy CA

Kay,

Attached is a draft of the Dynegy CA (bilateral).  The only executed bilateral CA we have in place with Dynegy is one prepared on their form.  I have not reviewed it, just talked to Kay Young.

 << File: Dynegy, Inc. and  EPMI Bilateral November 2001 (Entergy control area).doc >>


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:


Slow browser may need to wait 15 seconds for your email to appear, then scroll to view. mailto:leave-enerfaxdaily-800391E@relay.netatlantic.com to unsubscribe enerfaxdaily as: rod.hayslett@enron.com forward to web@enerfax.com
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

If you received this in error or no longer wish to subscribe forward this email to web@enerfax.com


I am attaching the latest draft of the gas GTC for your review.  Please note
that in discussions with Rolo and Guillermo yesterday that we determined that
we cannot call the gas product "firm" from a regulatory standpoint since we
do not plan to have firm transport and firm gas for all delivery points at
all times.  Additionally, I have started to redraft the damages clauses to
account for the fact that we may be the defaulting party and that certain of
our customers may not be able to purchase replacement gas or fuel on a spot
basis if we decide not to deliver on any given day.  (For that matter we may
not be able to resell gas on a spot basis if the counterparty does not take
on a given day.)  Rather than leave this situation ambiguous in the damages
section we thought it better to address the issue up front.

Julian and I met today on the power GTC and have generated more questions
than answers at the moment.  Julian, Andrea and I will need to work next week
on coming up with the next draft.  The key to the next draft is the
involvement of both Julian and Andrea.  Because of the unique Argentine
issues in drafting the GTC I will not be able to do much more than raise
questions and issues (and trying to clarify commercial positions) as I was
doing today with Julian.  I understand that Andrea may not be able to be in
Houston the beginning of next week but I would recommend that she come back
up Wednesday or Thursday and that perhaps Julian come to Houston Thursday
after his trip to London to help put the documentation to bed.  We are
working on this as fast as we can but there are some open issues that will
effect how the documentation will be drafted.  Julian can fill you in on some
of the details we were working on today.

Mark Taylor and I were on a conference call this morning with outside counsel
discussing how to structure your online products so they conform to the way
the rest of Enron is doing Online business and we should have the relevant
legal risks for Mark's consideration identified by counsel on Wednesday.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Here is the last draft of the product description for gas.

	Michael Guerriero
	10/13/2000 12:33 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian
Poole/SA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power GTC Status

In that now it is Friday afternoon please brief me on the status of this
document. When should I expect to receive the next draft.

MFG
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron on 10/13/2000
02:36 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Michael Guerriero                           10/12/2000 07:12 AM

To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian
Poole/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Power GTC Status

I am greatly concerned that the status of the power GTC is going to hold us
up at this point. I am aware you are all working on it today and Monday but
as far as I can see this document is only about 20 % done. Please put the
necessary time and attention into completing this document. I would like to
see a the draft  distributed after Julian and Brent have worked on it today.
I will submit my comments this weekend in advance of the Monday work session
with Andrea.

MFG


Subject: FWD: Warning: Beer Contains Female Hormones

How true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Warning: Beer Contains Female Hormones

Yesterday, scientists for Health Canada suggested that
men should take a look at their beer consumption,
considering the results of a recent analysis that
revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. The
theory is that drinking beer makes men turn into
women.

To test the finding, 100 men were fed 6 pints of beer
each.  It was then observed that 100% of the men
gained weight, talked excessively without making
sense, became overly emotional, couldn't drive, failed
to think rationally, argued over nothing,
and refused to apologize when wrong.

No further testing is planned.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Hello folks,
I will not be able to hold office hours this Thursday Nov 29.
However, I will hold office hours on Monday 3rd, between 7:30 and 8:15pm to
make up.

Madhur Duggar


Michelle/Jeff,

John Donnolly, Head of HR this potential partner, asked me this afternoon for the following data. We have this and can send it, but can you confirm that it is ok:

Employment agreements for "top 5"
Summary of last 12 months total compensation (including Base, Bonus, LTI, Keysop, retention and contracts payments).

I promised to get this to him tonight or tomorrow.

Seems to me if they have signed a confidentiality agreement and we are close to a deal with them this maybe appropriate. I'd volunteer to take the names off and just have  our GIS numbers as a code, but suspect this will confuse everyone.

David


- Mmay3100.doc


Remarketing.


Andy:
Enjoyed meeting with you.

One more thing I did not address.  My ultimate goal is to move all volume to
EOL.  However, in addition to the NYMEX, we have about 6 other viable
electronic trading systems.  We make it a point to never support these if
possible.  We will only trade if the other system's offer is at or greater
than our bid.  For instance, if we are 6/8 but have a strong inclination to
buy and another system is at 7, I will simultaneously lift their 7's and move
my market to 7/9.  The lesson the counterparty gets is he will only get the
trade if I'm bidding 7 and he will only get executed when it is a bad trade
to him.  People have learned fairly quickly not to leave numbers on the other
systems because they will just get picked off.  If they don't post numbers on
the other systems, the systems get no liquidity and die.

I mention this because I have heard that Enron is a fairly large trader on
Spectron's system.  I don't know whether it is in regards to gas, power, or
metals.  Just something to think about and maybe talk about with the other
traders.
John

Andrew Fairley
02/20/2001 11:15 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: David Gallagher/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trip to Houston

Thank you so much for your time last week.

David and I found the time especially valuable. We have spotted several
issues helpful for our own market.
This should certainly help in the growth of our markets here in Europe. We
trust it won't be too long before we see similarly impressive results from
our side of the pond.

Best regards

Andy


Mary- Ken has been asked by Mayor Brown to chair the fundraising effort to
get voter approval on a light rail referendum in Houston.  My guess is that
he will decline given the other demands on his schedule, but I don't know
that for sure.  I think our respnse

Mary Clark@ENRON
04/13/99 02:21 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Allen/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Trains - Light rail

Steve/Joe:

Mark suggested that I contact you to provide a response to this employee's
question (see below) to Ken and Jeff about trains and light rail.  Please
draft a response and send it to me.   I will format it and send it to Ken and
Jeff for their review.  Thanks.

Mary Clark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/13/99 02:13
PM ---------------------------

Office Chairman
04/12/99 02:55 PM

To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Trains - Light rail

A question to the Office of the Chairman.

Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Office Chairman/Corp/Enron on 04/12/99
02:53 PM ---------------------------

Office of the Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/12/99 07:25 AM
To: Office Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:

Office of the Chairman:

While traveling within Germany recently, I noticed that electric powered
trains are popular and also provide a safe, reliable, affordable and
comfortable means of transportation to the public.

This brought to mind a question to ask you:

Is Enron taking any action to promote development and implementation of
electric trains or light rail in the USA and/or abroad, either through the
Political Action Committee, Lobbying or through the efforts of the Business
Development Offices?

I do believe that the commuters would benefit from having access to electric
trains that provide safe, clean and comfortable transport. Enron could
potentially benefit by supplying the power for these trains within the USA
(and abroad as well).

Just think if the city of Houston offered light rail as an option for
commuting to and from work, as well as commuting to other locations - both
interstate and intrastate. A person could take a train to Galveston, Austin,
or elsewhere and arrive in short time with the high speed rail available.
With the new Ballpark downtown and the revitalization of the downtown area,
it would seem that a legitimate method of public transportation is the
element that is missing from the Houston city model. Buses that run on diesel
are clearly not the solution for mass transit.

Regards,
Dave Hubbard
Cuiaba, Brasil
011-55-65-612-2102


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
02:06 PM ---------------------------

Mark McCoy@ENRON
09/29/2000 02:02 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey
Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cornhusker Contact Information-REVISED

Apache
Vernon Tiger
phone:   713-296-6617
fax:   713-296-6319

2000 Post Oak Blvd. #100
Houston, TX  77056-4400

Lone Star Pipeline
Lisa McAuliff (Contracts)  Wilma Easter (Scheduling)
phone:  214-875-5224  phone: 214-875-3296
fax: 214-875-5134  fax: 214-875-3810

301 S. Harwood #801N
Dallas, TX 75201

Williams Energy
Jeff Goforth
phone: 918-573-8125
fax: 918-573-1530

PO Box 2848
Tulsa, OK 74101

Cinergy Marketing & Trading (Agent for Apache)
Lisa Hughes
phone: 281-583-6279
fax: 281-583-4353

616 FM 1960 W #800
Houston, TX 77090

(Note:  Cinergy will be moving downtown next month)


Shirley,

Voucher # 0100015652  for  $359.78

Vince


Ya nknow, every year it is the same thing with you guys....we are going to
dominate....we are the best.  The problem is you never deliver.
PL


RC #105900


Eric,
     Considering the number of fires we have at Enron right now this is about the last thing on Stan's mind.  Hill and Hartsoe are appropriate to be attending this meeting.  Again--I think that this is a bit more of Dennis' overkill.  Do you think he goes dove hunting with grenades?

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gadd, Eric
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:29 PM
To: McCarty, Danny
Subject: FW: Sent on Behalf of Dennis McConaghy - Washington

Danny,

I recommend that Bob Hill and Joe Hartzoe represent Enron in DC on 15 Nov with the Senators.  Dennis probably prefers that either you or Stan appear.  Please advise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Samantha Smith [mailto:samantha_smith@transcanada.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:34 PM
To: Somerhalder John; Holm Jay; Wright Byron S.; Wadlington Jr. Cuba; Moore James C. (Jim); Carlton Cavan; King Tom; Lund Peter; Horton, Stanley; McCarty, Danny; Gadd, Eric; Hulse Darcel; John Fred; Evans Robert B.; Reese Brad D.
Cc: Friesen Donna; Stewart D. Michael G.; Palmer Tony; Birch Murray; Moffatt J. Curtis; Roberts Tom; Ellwood John
Subject: Sent on Behalf of Dennis McConaghy - Washington

Gentleman,

The two attached email items from Van Ness describe draft legislation which Senator Murkowski is considering introducing and the likely timing of such action.

As the note describes, Murkowski would:

ban OTT; and
introduce a "trigger date concept", presently Jan. 1, 2003, for ANGTS would have filed with the Secretary of Energy a proposal which the Secretary certifies to be the substantial equivalent of a complete Section 7 application for public convenience and necessity; in the event the trigger date is not met, allow the "producer enabling" legislation, which would provide ANGTA-type expedition for any NGA Section 7 application to build a pipeline in Alaska, to come into effect.

Currently, our best sense is that Murkowski could unveil this alternative as early as next week, either as part of a Republican energy bill or an amendment to pending legislation.

Concurrently, the Democratic side , via the staffs of both Daschle and Bingaman, are preparing a comprehensive energy bill which will contain an Alaskan gas pipeline title.  At present, we do not yet have a sense of what that title would contain, and we been assured the current "placeholder" in the draft does not indicate that Daschle and Bingaman have
decided to support producer legislation.

While it is not certain that Murkowski could force this issue alone, it is in our collective best interests to forestall any producer legislation by demonstrating real progress as soon as possible. This is particularly true because the current political situation could make it easier for Murkowski or others to bypass the usual process and proceed with an amendment to non-energy legislation from the floor.

Based on the advice from our advisors in Washington, we believe that we should execute and publicly announce the MOU no later than November 15, and earlier if feasible.  We also believe  that the signatories to MOU should be available in Washington on the 15th to meet face to face with Murkowski, Binagman and Daschle to convey:

progress on the re-enlistment as represented by the MOU;
our commitment to the development of a commercial proposal for ANGTS that results in serious face-to-face negotiations in the first quarter of 2002; and
our continued position that any legislative action by Congress at this time is premature because

we have resolved, in principle, a key obstacle identified by the producers;
with all parties coalescing around an Alaskan Highway project, ANGTS remains the best vehicle for expediting the actual construction of the pipeline;
because we need the Producers as shippers, there is no possibility that we could exert undue commercial pressure on them; and
establishing a deadline would provide the producers with the incentive to simply run out the clock.

Although circumstances politically might suggest our being in Washington ahead of the 15th, I recognize that the 15th better conforms to the reality of commercial progress.  I plan to speak to this on the Wednesday commercial meeting in Calgary. I would hope that at the Wednesday meeting your representatives would be able to confirm your participation for meetings on the 15th with the three Senators.

Obviously, it is our view, at Foothills/ANNGTC, that we want to deflect the Congress from enacting any legislation at this time, and particularly anti-ANGTS legislation like that Murkowski is considering.  We need the help of Murkowksi and others to cause the Producers to match the serious steps and compromises we have made, not to enact a statutory scheme that encourages and rewards their unwillingness to develop a comprehensive pipeline package.

Dennis McConaghy  403-920-2011


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB2378 - Georgeanne Hodges (West Schedule C's)

Date:		4/26/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Mike McConnell is out of the office on vacation until next Wednesday.  He
does not have his computer with him on this trip, therefore he has asked me
to scan his e-mail for him.  Since he returns Wednesday, his calendar is very
full and unfortunately he will be in a meeting with the Executive Committee
off-site on Friday.  I can tentatively hold 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday
afternoon.  Since I will be unable to confirm this meeting with Mike until he
returns that same morning, can you please call me at X-36898 on Wednesday
morning to confirm the appointment.

Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
Assistant to Mike McConnell

Rod Sayers
08/30/2000 12:05 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron global markets

I understand you were in London last week. I'm sorry I missed you. As you
know we have people in London supporting coal, global liquids etc and I would
like to take the opportunity to chat about your plans and how we can assist
you in the most efficient manner possible.

I am in Houston next week with Janine Juggins who leads our trading support
team in tax and would be available Wednesday afternoon or Friday morning to
meet if you can fit us into your diary.

Regards

Rod


Please see comments in red below.   Thanks for sending this to us.  I almost
forgot how much fun it is to debate with you....even if I am irrational,
though I think you are this time!

DW

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Fwd: Military Courtesy Change

OK,

A. Why did they not respect him for all 8 years? When Clinton came into
office, he didn't have that
much negative publicity. GW has had as much for his DWI, cocaine use, getting
into Nat Guard through
father's connections, etc
Clinton had plenty of negative attention when he came on board, remember the
affairs (yes, plural), not inhaling, dodging the draft, etc.
I know I am not exaggerating on that.....  We can all thank Clinton for any
overdone media coverage on future presidents.

B. Why is GW deserving of so much military respect? He has not exactly been a
paragon of clean living.
Also, he got into the "champagne unit" of the National Guard ahead of
hundreds of other more qualified
people, according to time on the wait list, and extrance exams.
GW is trying to set a new "tone" in DC, which, I for one, respect.  Something
had to be done after the negative Clinton years.  Yes, he may have done some
good for the country, but he did not do anything to earn the respect he may
have gotten, which I hope was little.
And, please....atleast he wasn't taking pictures for journalism papers...he
was flying planes which takes a little more intelligance!


Well, hell, I forgot the attachment!  Here it is........


Kathleen,

We need to set up an LLC for the Blue Dog turbines.  Chris had proposed some
names at some point, then Ben had come up with something.  I now can't
remember what it is.  Anyway, it needs to be on the list for next week.

Thanks,

Kay


S & E Oifield Operating, Inc.:
	717457 - 120 dth/month -  on Gatherco, Inc

Don McKee Drilling, Inc.
	717622 - 930 dth/month - on Gatherco, Inc
	719444 -   30 dth/month - on Gatherco, Inc
	721843 - 380 dth/month - on Gatherco, Inc
	721845 - 350 dth/month - on Gatherco, Inc
	725870 - 560 dth/month - on Gatherco, Inc

Valley Petroleum, Inc.
	730805 - 2,300 dht/month - on Gatherco, Inc
	707846 - 6,500 dth/month - on CGas

Mark Hardesty:
	711586 - 140 dth/month - on CGas

Guy Dugan:
	706731 - 680 dth/month - on CGas

All above meters should be priced @ 100%  FOM IF TCo Index less any gathering and/or processing fees incurred by Buyer including those fees charged by Gatherco, Inc.

John


1 - Thank your for your order from Urban Retreat.  You will receive a
2 - confirmation by E-Mail shortly
3 -
4 - The Staff at Urban Retreat
5 -
6 -
7 -
neo-email_format - alpha
neo-email_from - urbanr@neosoft.com
neo-email_response - ~urbanr/default.html
neo-email_subject - THANK YOU FOR YOUR URBAN RETREAT ORDER
neo-email_to - skean@enron.com


USCAA Track & Field Championships, June 9, 2001
The Enron Running Club is seeking runners, sprinters, discus & shot put
throwers, and high jumpers & long jumpers to compete in the annual USCAA
Track & Field Championships on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.
Participate in co-ed track relays & field events of all ages and abilities;
showcase your energy and talents in a challenging, competitive, and fun
environment; participate in an Enron tradition since 1994; experience
teambuilding and camaraderie like never before!  For more information or to
sign up, contact Cindy Richardson at x3-4770 or sprint to:
http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html

Heights Fun Run 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Heights Fun Run 5K benefiting The Houston
Heights Association,s Community Projects scheduled for Saturday, June 2nd.
If you,re interested in running or volunteering your time, please contact
Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.  For more
information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Dad,s Day 5K
Join the Enron Running Club at the Dad,s Day 5K and 1 Mile Family Walk
benefiting The Prostate Cancer Research and Awareness scheduled for Saturday,
June 2nd.  If you,re interested in running or volunteering your time, please
contact Cindy Richardson at 713-853-4770 or Kelly Lombardi at 713-345-5841.
For more information, run to: http://home.enron.com:84/erc/index.html.

Stop by for some Texan BBQ, fresh air and Entertainment at Antioch Park

The Assist The Officer Foundation (ATO), a non-profit organization working
independently,  is inviting all Enron employees to come by Antioch Park  on
Friday, June 1st from 11am - 1pm and enjoy a delicious plate of BBQ for only
$5.  Come and listen to the tunes of KRBE with Gabe, their mobile DJ, and
raffles with many prizes will be given away.  Raffle tickets will be $2 each
or 3 for $5.  ATO is dedicated to assisting Houston peace officers injured or
disabled in the line of duty.  Please come out and support your local law
enforcement professionals.

The Caladium plants that are in the huge plant pots throughout the Plaza are
going to be replaced and will be available for purchasing on Monday, June 4th
for $4.00 in the Plaza by the up escalator from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m..

Join us in Dublin or Honolulu ----Joints in Motion is a marathon training
program for walkers and runners that is aligned with a fundraising effort for
the Arthritis Foundation.  The Dublin Marathon will be held Oct. 29 and the
Honolulu marathon will be December 9.  Please call for more information at
713-529-0800.

Volunteer for the Boys & Girls Club Summer Camp Weekends!!!
Kevin Hannon, Boys & Girls Club board member, invites you to join Enron
employee John Cote at a Boys & Girls Club summer camp who is looking for
commitment from a FEW GOOD ENRON MEN AND WOMEN:

WHAT:   2nd Annual Houston Boys and Girls Club / Enron Summer Camp Weekend (2
camps)

WHEN:   Boys Camp
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), June 22 through Sunday afternoon, June 24
  --OR--
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 20 through Sunday afternoon, July 22

  Girls Camp
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 6 through Sunday afternoon, July 8
  --OR--
  Friday afternoon (3:00 - 6:00pm), July 13 through Sunday afternoon, July 15

WHERE: Willis, TX (75 minutes from downtown Houston -- just north of Conroe)

WHO:   6-8 counselors per camp to chaperone 75 boys (ages 7-16)

HOW:   Share all sports activities, including canoeing, hiking, fishing,
organizing a talent    show/bonfire/ghost stories, obstacle course, water
balloon fights, softball, basketball,   archery, football, etc.  (Cooking and
clean-up covered by the Houston Boys Club staff.)

CONTACT: John A. Cote at ext. 33830

SPREAD THE WORD.  SPOUSES & OFFICE COLLEAGUES WELCOME.
LAST YEAR'S CAMP WAS A HUGE SUCCESS!

Volunteers Needed for Bring Your Child to Work Day!

Bring Your Child to Work Day is Friday, June 29

Please email Jennifer Milligan if you are interested in volunteering and
indicate your preference in the below activities:

Registration Table
Houston Police Dept / Stranger Danger / Fingerprinting
Outdoor Activities (SPCA pets, Balloon King, kids crafts, etc.)
Business Etiquette class
Business Art (kids' resumes, etc)
Lunch ticket sales/coordination (in Antioch Park)

The Enron Running Club and the Houston Corporate Athletic Association are
seeking volunteers to assist at the annual USCAA Track & Field Championships
on Saturday, June 9th at Rice University.  There are many volunteer
opportunities requiring little or no experience including timers, scoring,
lane judges, cheering on athletes and more!  We are looking for employees,
families and friends that can contribute a few hours or who are willing to
spend the day benefiting a great cause.  If you are interested or would like
more information, please contact Kelly Lombardi at x3-8491.

Many volunteers are needed to help with the planned activities for the Enron
Children on June 29th.  If you're interested, send your name and phone
extension to workperks.enron.com.

Support KidSave and Help Miracles Happen. Every Summer.

Kidsave,s  Summer Miracles Program enables orphaned children ages 5 to 11 to
travel to the  US and Canada, live with families and attend day camp. The
program gives  families who may be concerned about the problems of adopting
an older child a chance to meet, get to know and in the best-case scenario,
fall in love with a  child. The program gives prospective parents an
opportunity to see and evaluate  first-hand the challenges and rewards of
adopting an older  child.

In 1999 and  2000 Kidsave and adoption agency partners placed 432 children -
96 percent of  children who participated in the program. Generally, 85 to 90
percent of  children who participate in the program find homes easily through
the program.  The remaining 10 to 15 percent require more work.

Kidsave  believes every child deserves a family. We are committed to placing
all children  who participate in the Summer Miracles Program in permanent
families or  family-like environments.

We are looking  for families to host children, and for others who want to
help us make the camp  program happen for these 250 children.   As a
non-profit organization, Kidsave depends on donations to raise the  money to
bring these children here and find them families.  Please call Tonya Hoppe at
281.286.8948  or tonya@tonya.cc to get involved in Houston,s  Kidsave
program.

Find Out how to Join The Downtown Club May 29 & 30!
The Downtown Club (formerly The Met-Business & Sports Club)Membership
representatives from The Downtown Club will be in the Enron Plaza
Tuesday-Wednesday, May 29-30, from 11 am - 1 pm to discuss membership, the
new "Signature Gold" program (see attached file for more information), and a
new membership referral program.  Don't miss out on this opportunity to join
the Downtown Club or to upgrade your current membership.  As a reminder, a
$200 initiation fee is required for new memberships.   For more information,
contact The Downtown Club Membership Services department at 713-652-0700 or
Georgia Fogo, ext. 3-5609.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/siggoldcourses.pdf

Enron and Kidventure Camps are proud to bring you Camp Enron Summer 2001.
Celebrating our third year, Camp Enron  will once again be providing summer
camp for children, ages 5-13, of Enron employees and contractors.

This year, camp will be May 29-August 10.  Ten, one-week sessions will be
available and families may choose to attend any or all sessions.  Each camp
week is Monday through Friday.

The cost is $150 per week and includes all transportation, field trips and
activities.  A deposit of $50 per week is all that is needed to reserve your
sessions.   The deadline to register is Monday, May 21.

To register, log on to: http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm.
Spaces are limited.

Enron parents simply ride to work with  their children and check them in to
the Energizer in the morning with the Camp Enron Team.  Enron Campers are
loaded on Coach USA Buses and transported to our nearby camp. At the end of
the day campers are brought back to the Energizer for parents to check out.

It's that easy!

For more information please contact:

web site: www.kidventurecamp.com
call Kidventure: 713.960.8989
e-mail: camps@kidventurecamp.com

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to
EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday,s mailing.