This e-mail was mistakely sent to the "other" Mark Schroeder in Omaha.  In
any event, given our discussion yesterday, do we really want to be jumping
through hoops for this Indonesian gas firm.  Jane Wilson did mention to me
yesterday that we were pursuing a JV.  Is that off or likely to be put off,
given our narrowed focus in Asia/Southeast Asia?   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 09/02/2000
13:45 ---------------------------

Mark A Schroeder@ENRON
09/02/2000 13:39
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Schroeder/NPNG/Enron on 02/09/2000
07:39 AM ---------------------------

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/09/2000 07:33 AM
To: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Adair@ECT,
Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, J3NG@aol.com, Repit
Suliyono/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marshall Burchard@ECT (bcc:
Mark A Schroeder/NPNG/Enron)

Subject: Regulatory/Commercial Advice Needed by PGN/Indonesia

PGN requires the following soonest:

1.   Our comments on their draft Gas Transportation Agreement for
     delivery of gas to Singapore.   Draft GTA  being DHLed to you
      by our Jakarta office.  They will be supplying some 350MMCF/day
      to Singapore by 2002.  They need to finish this document this month.
      They request us to make suggested changes directly on the
      text with comments and explanations shown in the margins.

2.   Any papers we have summarizing the principles of gas transportaton
     agreements -- including cross-border agreements.

3.  Laws/language on third party access to pipelines from other
     countries (along with their pros and cons).  They
      need this to help them draft the thrid party access provisions
      for the new Oil and Gas law on which comments are due shortly.

Following is being sent to you by DHL:

4   Copies of the training program on regulatory affairs done for PGN by
     NERA last May.  [confidential].   This is so you and Jane will know
     what PGN already has been taught and not to go over the same ground.

5.   Copies of the advice on a regulatory regime for gas provided to PGN
     by NERA in 1997 (confidential).

DM


-----Original Message-----
From: Pola.Florez@sce.com [mailto:Pola.Florez@sce.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 8:43 AM
To: DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; John.L.Norris@Boeing.com;
KFreeman@Sempra.com; LVanWagenen@Sempra.com; NXK2@pge.com; RJP2@pge.com;
Slayman@energy.state.ca.us; abb@eslawfirm.com; ack@aelaw.com;
afinley@mwd.dst.ca.us; alexm@calpine.com; anchau@shellus.com;
aorchar@smud.org; askaff@energy-law-group.com; ath@cpuc.ca.gov;
athomas@newenergy.com; awp@cpuc.ca.gov; beth.fox@sce.com;
bfinkelstein@turn.org; bill.mccallum@ci.fresno.ca.us;
bill@jbsenergy.com; bishop@jrwood.com; bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us;
blaising@braunlegal.com; bloomje@la.whitecase.com;
bob_anderson@apses.com; bpowers@seniors.org; bradylaw@pacbell.net;
brb3@pge.com; brbarkovich@earthlink.net; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov;
btenney@landuselaw.com; butzjh@apci.com; callen@akingump.com;
car@cpuc.ca.gov; chilen@llgm.com; chris@emeter.com; chrism@mid.org;
christine_ferrari@ci.sf.ca.us; chrisw@greenlining.org;
clpearce@duanemorris.com; cmkehrein@ems-ca.com; cmw@cpuc.ca.gov;
cpeyton@sacbee.com; cread@steptoe.com; ctd@cpuc.ca.gov;
cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; cyounger@manatt.com; dcarroll@dbsr.com;
dchen@ameren.com; ddavie@hesinet.com; derkp@newsdata.com;
dgeorge@kroger.com; dhuard@manatt.com; difellman@energy-law-group.com;
dkk@eslawfirm.com; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; dmarcus@slip.net;
doug.anderson@calenergy.com; douglass@arterhadden.com;
dpritchard@mofo.com; drp6@pge.com; dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov;
dws@keywaycorp.com; ed@apx.com; ed@clfp.com; ek@a-klaw.com;
ell5@pge.com; emkeefe@west.raytheon.com; enfile@csc.com;
epoole@adplaw.com; firmiyas@dof.ca.gov; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
fmwd@fmwd.com; foothill@lmi.net; fosterbc@sce.com; frank.cooley@sce.com;
freedman@turn.org; fsheets@txi.com; fua@cpuc.ca.gov;
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; fwmonier@tid.org; gdreed@sidley.com;
georgeperrault@msn.com; gerhordt.herbert@msdw.com; gig@cpuc.ca.gov;
glsg@pge.com; gtbl@dynegy.com; harrington@ggra.org; hbd@gweiss.com;
hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us; hjh@keywaycorp.com; hodgesjl@pacbell.net;
honest@compuserve.com; howens@seniors.org; hpatrick@gmssr.com;
huse@eesconsulting.com; imoosen@gralegal.com; j.p.shotwell@sce.com;
j3m9@pge.com; jbarthrop@www.electricamerica.com; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jbradley@svmg.org; jbushee@sablaw.com; jcpaine@stoel.com;
jdh@eslawfirm.com; jeff@hmhresources.com; jguzman@nossaman.com;
jhay@Sempra.com; jherrera@dpw.co.la.ca.us; jhg@meyersnave.com;
jjz@cpuc.ca.gov; jleslie@luce.com; jlyoung@Sempra.com;
jmalkin@orrick.com; jmh@cpuc.ca.gov; jnnc@chevron.com;
joe.paul@dynegy.com; jon.jacobs@paconsulting.com; joseh@lif.org;
jparrott@Sempra.com; jpbatmale@realenergy.com; jperrine@calwater.com;
jptang@oaklandcityattorney.org; jrd@cpuc.ca.gov; jskillman@prodigy.net;
jsmollon@newwestenergy.com; jsqueri@gmssr.com; jsw@cpuc.ca.gov;
jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; julesan@aol.com; jvaleri@Sempra.com;
jweil@aglet.org; jweisgall@aol.com; jyf1@pge.com; jyoung@ebmud.com;
karen@klindh.com; keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com; kfantz@ppeng.com;
kim@cpuc.ca.gov; kmccrea@sablaw.com; kmcspadd@milbank.com;
kmelville@Sempra.com; kmills@cfbf.com; kok@cpuc.ca.gov;
kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com; kristi.oakley@irwin.army.mil;
kswitzer@scwater.com; ktilton@gralegal.com; lbelew@viterrausa.com;
lgurick@calpx.com; llk@cpuc.ca.gov; lmh@eslawfirm.com;
louh@valleyelectric.org; lss@cpuc.ca.gov; luluw@newsdata.com;
marywong@Sempra.com; mbazeley@sjmercury.com; mbrubaker@consultbai.com;
mday@gmssr.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com;
melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com; mer@cpuc.ca.gov; mgomez1@bart.gov;
mhg@hetrading.com; mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mmattes@nossaman.com;
mpa@a-klaw.com; mpatel@brownwoodlaw.com; mrw@mrwassoc.com;
mschwebs@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; mv1@cpuc.ca.gov;
mzs@cpuc.ca.gov; napedersen@jonesday.com; natutt@duanemorris.com;
nevillm@hdcdojnet.state.ca.us; nryan@environmentaldefense.org;
oshirock@pacbell.net; pat.williams@dhcmail.com;
patrickm@crossborderenergy.com; paul.harris@bridge.com; pav@aelaw.com;
pbaughman@urmgroup.com; pbray@newpower.com;
perezjm@efdsw.navfac.navy.mil; peter_fox-penner@brattle.com;
phanschen@mofo.com; picketse@sce.com; pjpowerlaw@aol.com;
pmcdonne@wenet.net; pmd@cpuc.ca.gov; poynts@udi-tetrad.com;
ppejh@west.net; pxo2@pge.com; randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov;
raw@cpuc.ca.gov; rax@cpuc.ca.gov; rbw@mrwassoc.com; rcsstl@cdmnet.com;
riald@kindermorgan.com; rick.counihan@greenmountain.com;
risom@ix.netcom.com; rkeen@manatt.com; rliebert@cfbf.com;
rmccann@cal.net; rmckilli@csc.com; robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com;
rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com; ronknecht@aol.com;
rpernell@energy.state.ca.us; rrcollins@n-h-i.org; rrh3@pge.com;
rschmidt@bartlewells.com; rtanner@scwater.com;
rtavares@energy.state.ca.us; rtf@cpuc.ca.gov; rtp1@pge.com;
sberlin@mccarthylaw.com; scottst@mid.org; scr@cpuc.ca.gov;
sfc@cpuc.ca.gov; sgreenberg@realenergy.com; sheila@wma.org;
smckenzie41@home.com; smoss@hooked.net; smutny@iepa.com;
sro@cpuc.ca.gov; sslavigne@duke-energy.com; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net;
suptsoc@iidoasis.com; swchurchill@juno.com; thaines@smud.org;
theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us; thoulihan@mdbe.com; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tmberliner@duanemorris.com; tom.oneill@abnamro.com;
tomb@crossborderenergy.com; tsmegal@calwater.com;
twitthoft@calwater.com; txb@cpuc.ca.gov; utility@parkbilling.com;
uwuaregion5@earthlink.net; wbooth@booth-law.com; whe1@pge.com;
wilkinsb@tamcosteel.com; ztc@cpuc.ca.gov
Subject: SCE Advice 1545-E

On May 22, 2001, SCE filed Advice 1545-E with the Commission.

Title:
Tariffs Implementing Decision No. 01-05-064

Purpose:
This advice filing is made in compliance with D.01-05-064 in SCE's Rate
Stabilization proceeding.  As discussed in more detail in the "Information"
section below, this advice filing:  (1) modifies tariff language where
necessary to implement new rate structures; and (2) revise rate components
in all tariff schedules and other impacted sections of the Preliminary
Statement in compliance with Ordering Paragraphs 1 and 2 of D.01-05-064.
Form No. 14-574,  Formats A.1 through L.1 are being modified to display the
new tiered baseline rates and the new California Department of  Water
Resources (DWR) Charges line item.

To view this advice filing and other SCE advice letters, please click on
the URL address below and select the Regulatory Info Center, Advice
Letters.

http://www.sce.com/005_regul_info/005b_advice_letters_tariffs.shtml.

This notice is being sent to all interested parties of R.00-11-038 and
SCE's GO 96-A Service List.


Mr. Kaminski,

I have attached a resume below I thought you might find of interest, it is
from a Business School acquaintance of mine, Denis Suvorov.  Denis is a
highly intelligent Ph.D. candidate at my former school and is currently
looking for opportunities within a research/modelling framework.  He has
significant academic experience working on Asset pricing models and after
speaking with Pavel Zadorozhny about his background and objectives, he
recommended I forward a copy of his credentials to you.

I hope this is suitable and would be of interest to you.

Thanks,
Matthew Frank


Just curious if this got done last night?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.; Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	FW: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Theriot, Kim S.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

Cecilia,

Here is the list of Counterparties that have been requested:

CP ID	     Counterparty

504	     Alabama Gas Corporation
8	     Amerada Hess Corporation
64516	     Avista Corporation
55265	     Avista Energy, Inc.
68247	     Bankers Trust International PLC
65291	     BP Corporation North America Inc.
410	     Burlington Resources, Inc.
23848	     Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation
79689	     Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
5264	     Cargill, Incorporated
881	     Central Illinois Light Company
65599	     CMS Field Services Inc.
69	     Columbia Energy Services Corporation
56630	     Consolidated Energy Solutions, Inc.
26427	     Consumers Gas Company, LTD.
74362	     Continental Gas, Inc.
52577	     Cornerstone Propane, L.P.
1424	Florida Power Corporation
55109	Hess Energy Trading Company LLC
3796	Hunt Petroleum Corporation
1901	Kaztex Energy Management Inc.
2094	Marathon Oil Company
53782	National Energy & Trade, L.L.C.
5563	New York Mercantile Exchange
64141	NJR Energy Services Company
155	Noble Gas Marketing Inc.
151	Northern Illinois Gas Company
69121	NRG Power Marketing Inc.
63665	Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.
54438	PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
58402	PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
46709	Phibro Inc.
55776	Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
33367	PMI Trading, LTD
49262	Questar Energy Trading Company
65268	Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
187	San Diego Gas & Electric Company
103469	Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
3996	Sithe Energies, Inc.
26146	Societe Generale
11134	St. Mary Land & Exploration Company
3022	Texaco Natural Gas Inc.
81385	The New Power Company
37810	Venoco, Inc.
96651	Vitol Capital Management Ltd.
46924	Vitol S.A.
232	Western Gas Resources, Inc.
237	Wisconsin Power And Light Company


Peggy Mahoney@EES
02/16/2001 04:59 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dave Delainey Bio

FYI -after this went out, the reporter responded back that you are in the
running.
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 02/16/2001 04:52
PM ---------------------------

Karen Denne@ENRON
02/16/2001 03:46 PM
To: julie_schlosser@fortunemail.com
cc:  (bcc: Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES)
Subject: Dave Delainey Bio

Julie -- Here's info on one more "rising star" at Enron.  Call me if you need
any additional info.

Thanks! Have a great weekend!

Karen
713-853-9757


I gave hard copies of the following to Joe Parks (in addition to other supporting documents).  He will talk with the higher-ups in order to get approval.  We are uncertain what they will do, although ENA Legal has opined that we return the funds.

We will keep you updated.


I have not heard any comments re attached except that John Scarborough is
working on numbers updates and changes.  Let me know of any other comments or
scheduling issues.  I am back in the office.  Thanks, NJD

---------------------- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 05/26/2000 11:36
AM ---------------------------

Nora Dobin
05/23/2000 09:02 PM
To: Stephanie Balette Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cris
Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Scarborough/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gallup

Attached for your review is a draft of the Amendments to the Gallup LLC
investment documents to reflect increased purchase price for ECS Gallup LLC
interest sold to ECHO.  Please note that there are four blanks that need to
be filled in (one on page 1, two on page 3 (from Flow of Funds memo) and one
on Exhibit A (need value of contributed Gallup assets to set ECS capital
contribution amount)). Let me know your comments.  Stephanie, I believe we
can forward attached to Patty and her counsel for simultaneous review but
will let you make that call.

FYI, I am working from out of town on business but check voice mail (during
day) and e-mail (at night). I should be back in office this Friday but can
handle matters through these media until then.

Regards, NJD


6468860  thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:18 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

What's your fax number?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:10 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

can you send me a copy of the K?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:47 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

The agreement covers multiple projects; to date there is only one project that has come on line.  For the one project that has come on line during the non-performance penalty could be in the range of $150,000 to $640,000, depending on the resoultion of the "effective online date" for said project.  The non-performance penalty was our strongest negotiating point in the ongoing effort to restructure the agreement as there is a potential for penalties for each project for each year of the contract.  The agreement contained some fundamenal flaws in order to be able to book the mark-to-market for the agreement.

I do not have a good handle of the "early termination payment" except to say that there are approxmiately 390,500 MWh's.  The average contract "fixed price" is $33.10 MWh.  I would need to find out what the nine year fixed price from the power curves is to estimate but my best stab would be to estimate the nine year fixed price to be $25.00 MWh which would result in "early termination payment" of approximately $3,200,000 ((390,500*33.10) - (390,500*25.00)).

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:25 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Thanks.  Can you get a bead on the relative value of the ETP and the non-performance penalties?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:53 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.
Subject:	RE: Riverside County Waste Mgt

Mike,

The "deal" is between EESI and Riverside County Waste Management Department (RCWMC) is dated April 17, 2000 and the term commenced on Sepetmber 1, 2000 and ending on September 1, 2010.  Based on our bankruptcy filing RCWMD stopped delivery of power on December 6, 2001; RCWMD invoiced EESI for power production for September 2001, 0ctober 2001 and November 2001.  I do not know if they were ever paid by EESI.  I do not know of any invoice for the first six days of December 2001.

EESI (myself) and EPMI (Chris Foster) were in the process of renegotiating the above referenced agreement with the plan for EPMI to take over the purchase of power and scheduling services with EESI being the purchaser of the "green tickets"  from EPMI associated with the power production.  There were some major issues to overcome in the renegotiation regarding the "fixed price", "volume committments" and "penalties".  I do not know who, if anyone, is currently looking at this agreement to make any kind of determination EESI's and/or EPMI's desires for the future of this agreement.

RCWMD sent various letters dated December 10, 2001, December 13, 2001, and January 8, 2002 requesting response from EESI.  The December 10, 2001 letter indicates that RCWMD considers the agreement terminated effective December 2, 2001.  I had previously spoke to you about this agreement in December 2001.

It is my opinion that we should not continue this agreement and we should consider RCWMD's offer to terminate the agreement with the exchange of the non-performance panalties for the termination payment.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Regards,

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:36 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Riverside County Waste Mgt

Richard--what do you know about this deal?  Do you have paper on it?  Is this a purchase deal that we want?  Are we buying under it now?

The customer is pushing me to give them some answers.  Thanks.  MDS


6633 TRAVIS STREET / HOUSTON, TX 77030 / 713-313-4000 / FAX: 713-313-4660


Ben/Chris,

Unless something new comes up, I think we finished the letter agreement.  I'm
awaiting a revised draft now, and if it is acceptable to NW, they will sign
it and fax it to me tomorrow morning.

Maybe on Ben's layover we can have a discussion about where we go from here
from a schedule standpoint.

Talk to you tomorrow,

Kay


Please mark your calendar for the following weekly meeting:

Mid Market/Trader Mtg.
Thursday's
room 3125b
3 - 3:30pm

Please let me know if you have schedule conflicts.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


I have been trying to get an ISDA going with Enron for several months. Who
is the best contact to call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: kaprice@srpnet.com
Subject: Master purchase/sale agreement

Kent,

Attached is a draft copy of our Master Purchase/Sale Agreement for physical
natural gas transactions.  As I mentioned before, we can enter into
transactions for less that one year out.  However, for those outside of a
year and for longer terms, we need to have a master in place.  Hopefully,
we can get this one in place so that we will be prepared when/if we get
ready to transact.

Let me know if you have any questions.  I will have our legal guys standing
by to help, too.

Thanks,

Kim Ward

(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)

 - Master_NG_draft_contract.doc


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: unlded77.pdf)(See attached file: hoil77.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - unlded77.pdf
 - hoil77.pdf


PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE PROJECT LIST FOR LNG PROJECTS

NEW PROJECT:

	PROJECT NAME			#		DESCRIPTION

1.	WEST COAST DEVELOPMENT		C00597201XX	TO RECORD TIME AND EXPENSES FOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES RELATING TO CALIFORNIA 								AND MEXICO

2.	ELBA ISLAND MARKETING EFFORTS	C00597301XX	TO RECORD TIME AND EXPENSES RELATING TO MARKETING EFFORTS

CHANGES TO EXISTING PROJECTS:

HOEGH GALLEON MERCHANT ACTIVITIES AND SPOT SALES PROJECTS ARE NOW COMBINED. PLEASE USE E.00017601XX  FOR CODING TIME AND EXPENSES.  PLEASE NOTE THAT SPOT SALES PROJECT # E.00077201XX WILL NOT ACCEPT ANY CHARGES .

DOM REP C00099002XX IS CLOSED AND WILL NOT BE ACCEPTING ANY CHARGES GOING FORWARD.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS , PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL:

BARBARA GARCIA		54369
ROBERT WINGENTER		54370
SHILPA KADAKIA			54502

FOR CODING TODAY'S TIMESHEET, PLEASE NOTE THESE CHANGES.

SHILPA


Michael,

Attached for your review and comment is the updated draft incorporating
certain copyright and contractual relationship language.  The new sections
that were added are Section 1(c) and Section 4.  If you have any questions or
comments please give me a call.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886

	Michael Eiben
	12/04/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

we are trying to finalize this section.  could you guys give us your input?

thanks,    mve
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

meiben@ect.enron.com on 11/30/2000 04:21:03 PM
Please respond to meiben@ect.enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

LEGAL AND PRIVACY INFORMATION

1. All information and material including images, text and audio on this
website is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its subsidiaries (and/or its or
its subsidiaries' licensors) (collectively "Enron") and is subject to
copyright.Trading Innovation, Endless possibilities, Enron.com, Enron, Enron
& design, Enron Corp., Enron Corp. & design, Enron with fanciful E, Enron
with fanciful E (color), are all trademarks owned by Enron Corp. All other
trade marks on this website are the property of their respective owners. You
are entitled to view, copy and print any documents from this website but only
for your own internal business purposes. Any sale, transmission or
redistribution of this website or its content, and any copying, modification
or other use of this website or its content for any purposes other than your
own internal business purposes, are strictly prohibited.
2. This website is provided solely for information purposes and, with the
exception of this "Legal and Privacy" statement, is not intended to, and
shall not, constitute any offer or acceptance with respect to any
transactions or other matters. This website shall not create any legal
relationship between you and Enron, unless you have signed a Password
Application, in which case the Online User Agreement and all terms and
conditions referred to therein shall govern your access and utilization of
this website. Copies of the Online User Agreement may be obtained through the
"Registration" Section on this website. This website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions.
3. This website and the information and material which it contains are
subject to change at any time by Enron without notice and Enron reserves the
right to suspend, terminate or restrict your access to or use of this
website. All warranties, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information contained on this website or in respect of
any materials or products referred to on this website are hereby excluded to
the extent permitted by law.

NETSCAPE NETCENTER	spacer	??Search??-??WebMail??-??My Netscape??-??Buddy Chat??-??Help
??-??Download??
		spacer

Check out our advertiser! Click here.

	[IMAGE]Home > ?Netscape?Search		?[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	Search Results

		- Search Categories -Arts & EntertainmentBusinessComputing &
InternetGamesHealthHome &
FamilyNetscapeNewsRecreationReferenceRegionalScience &
TechnologyShoppingSociety & LifestylesSportsWorld
			[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	Search Here:
	[IMAGE]
	amazon.com
	 legal and...
	Buy Books Here
	Holiday Shopping

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?

	[IMAGE]
	Specialized Searches
	Yellow Pages
	People Finder
	Maps and Directions
	Product Search
	Decision Guides
	Local Information
	International Search

	[IMAGE]
	Search again for
	'  legal and...  ' using
	Google

	[IMAGE]
	Learn More
	Search directly from your browser.
	Internet Keywords
	Netscape Search
	Affiliate Program
	Frequent Questions
	Tips on Searching

	[IMAGE]
	 Get Involved
	Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	Become an Editor
	Suggest a Site
	Give Feedback

	Get the latest
	Communicator.
	  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

					Search Results for ' legal and privacy page
					[IMAGE]

					[IMAGE]
					Reviewed Web Sites
					Web sites reviewed and categorized by a team of editors.
					1 - 1 ?of ? 1

					 CPierson's Cyberlaw Page
					Links to cases, statutes, and legal information relating to the Internet,
including First Amendment, intellectual property, privacy, commerce, and
crime.
					http://www.cpierson.com/
					found in:? Society > Law > Legal Information > Computer and Technology Law
?>? Legal Links
					?

					[IMAGE]

					 Search for 'legal and privacy page' with these other search engines:
					AltaVista |  AskJeeves | Excite | GoTo |  HotBot | LookSmart | Lycos

					[IMAGE]
					??Search Again or Ask a Question
					[IMAGE]

					???
						[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	??Netcenter Help??-??Site Map??-??Advertise with Us??-??What's
New??-??What's Cool 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
Check out our advertiser! Click here.
,?2000 Netscape. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Please read this message from Cynthia and get back to her if you can help.
Thank you.

Cynthia Gonter@EES
03/22/2000 10:25 AM

MS150 VOLUNTEERS NEEDED !!!

CONTACT CYNTHIA GONTER
(713) 345-7404

If you are unable to ride or if you now someone that just wants to be a part
of this GREAT EVENT "MS150" please contact Cynthia Gonter at the above phone#
so we may add you to the list.  We need people for the lunch break on Sat
April 15 in Bellville, that afternoon in Fayette County Fairgrounds in La
Grange were we will all camp out at night and have a great dinner and
entertainment.  This year we will also like to have some of our volunteers
follow the riders to their end of VICTORY FINISH LINE.  We need people for
lunch at Bastrop High School and at the finish line were there will be
another party given by MS to celebrate the great challange our rides have
just accomplished.  This will be in Austin at the Applied Materials site.

WE ARE LOOKING FOR SERIOUS VOLUNTEERS THAT ARE WILLING TO SHARE THE FUN AND
EXCITING EVENT OF THE YEAR WITH THIS GREAT ENRON TEAM !!!!

We look forward to hearing from you soon so we may have a group meeting and
schedule you for your times.


Calm down, everyone.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnston, Robert
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE: [Fwd: FW: CHARGES FOR E-MAIL -Forwarded]

I'm guessing no.  Government bills aren't numbered as indicated below.  The current Senate bill 602 is the "Common Sense Federal Election Reform Act of 2001"; current House bill 602 is "Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act."  No email stuff in either one, I would assume.  The only email related bill is HR2281 "The Digital Divide Elimination Act of 2001."  This relates to tax credits to help lower-income people buy computers.  I can't find a record of any "Representative Tony Schnell."  I would also note that the Washington magazine is a monthly, not a weekly as suggested below.

Also, most "PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!" emails are hoaxes.  This was a fun test- got any more?!

RJ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Johnston, Robert
Subject:	FW: [Fwd: FW: CHARGES FOR E-MAIL -Forwarded]

is this true?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lawrence Goldberg <lgoldb@bellsouth.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Al_Rosckes; Allan Weiss; Arnie Yashar; Bert Sparrow; Brenda Falkenstein; Bryan Loy, M.D.; Carlos Katz; David Joels; Ellen Shaikun; Gregory Semerdjian; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Jennifer Goldberg; Jerry Usulander; Matthew and Shira Goldberg; Stuart Goldberg; Susanna and Matt Liljenstolpe
Subject:	[Fwd: FW: CHARGES FOR E-MAIL -Forwarded]

Return-Path: <LarryGoldberg@chi-caritas.org>
Received: from smtp.chi-caritas.local ([216.77.69.35])          by imf02bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.01.01 201-252-104)          with ESMTP          id <20011024214609.ISSP13544.imf02bis.bellsouth.net@smtp.chi-caritas.local>          for <lgoldb@bellsouth.net>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:46:09 -0400
Received: by selsvmsx01.chi-caritas.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)	id <TP7WM2NW>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:38:52 -0400
Message-ID: <13B7E55B253DD21182470008C7FA0A141B155B@selsvmsx01.chi-caritas.local>
From: "Goldberg, Larry" <LarryGoldberg@chi-caritas.org>
To: 'Lawrence Goldberg' <lgoldb@bellsouth.net>
Subject: FW: CHARGES FOR E-MAIL -Forwarded
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:38:50 -0400
Return-Receipt-To: "Goldberg, Larry" <LarryGoldberg@chi-caritas.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C15CD4.452E2A00"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith Steve
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:10 PM
To: /SE LSV Everyone - All CARITAS E-Mail Users
Subject: CHARGES FOR E-MAIL -Forwarded

-----Original Message-----
Date:  10/24/2001  12:14 pm  (Wednesday)
From:  Debbie Curran <dcurran@archlou.org>
To:  "'Bradley, Betty'" <memaw000@aol.com>, "'Brown, Charlie & Fran'"
     <BrownCnF@aol.com>, "'Brown, Marty'" <martdeac@bellsouth.net>,
     "'Chathaparampil, Joe (work)'"
     <chathaparampilj@ftknox5-emh3.army.mil>, "'Clark, Bill'"
     <bclark@cecilianbank.com>, "'Cottrell, Franco & Elly'"
     <fcottrell@win.net>, "'Dalton, Dave & Kay'"
     <daltonkddavid@aol.com>, "'Dant, Joe'" <jrdant@kih.net>, "'Dant,
     Wally & Barbara'" <wallydant@excite.com>, "'Dever, Robert &
     Bonnie'" <rdever@bellsouth.net>, "'Dew, Joe & Betty'"
     <fafadoc@bbtel.com>, "'Edwards, Mike & Joyce'"
     <MikeandJoyceE@aol.com>, "'Fargen, Jerry & Paula'"
     <mphf@juno.com>, "'Filiatreau, Joe'" <filiac@bardstown.com>,
     "'Flowers, Don'" <dkflowers_2000@yahoo.com>, "'Hall, Bob &
     Cheri'" <bobcheri@ne.infi.net>, "'Harris, Pat & Jean'"
     <pat.harris@louisville.edu>, "'Imel, Bob & Barbara'"
     <robertimel@kvnet.org>, "'Jenkins, Jay & Rita'"
     <jjenkins@kvnet.org>, "'Jones, Mike & Debbie'"
     <
Subject:  CHARGES FOR E-MAIL

>     VERY IMPORTANT ........ PLEASE PASS ALONG !!!!
> >
> >
> >
> > >Subject: Federal Bill 602p
> > >
> > >Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail
> > >sent.  It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill
> > >602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on
> every
> > >delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to
> > >stay
> > >online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an
> > >alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to
> quietly
> > >push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.
> > >
> > >Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting
> > >to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees."
> > >
> > >Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
> > >surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service
> Providers
> > >at
> > >source.
> > >
> > >The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
> > >
> > >Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to
> > >prevent this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is
> > >claiming
> > >lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
> > >$230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad
> > >campaign:
> > >
> > >"There is nothing like a letter."
> > >
> > >Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day
> > >in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50
> cents
> > >a
> > >day or over $180 per year -- above and beyond their regular Internet
> costs.
> > >
> > >Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service
> > >for a service they do not even provide.
> > >
> > >The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference.
> > >You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of
> > >bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter
>
> to
> > >be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is
> > >allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the "free"
> > >Internet in the United States.
> > >
> > >Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a
> > >"$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond
> the
> > >governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major
> > >newspapers
> > >have ignored the story the only exception being the Washingtonian which
>
> > >called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has
> come"
> > >(March 6th,  1999 Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom
> erode
> > >away!
> > >
> > >Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends
> > >and relatives to write their congressional representative and say
> > >"NO"  to Bill 602P.
> > >
> > >It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
> > >instrumental in killing a bill we do not want.
> > >
> > >PLEASE FORWARD!
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________

 - Header << File: Header >>


No can do.  Thanks anyway.

Lisa Mellencamp@ECT
02/16/2001 12:27 PM
To: Shirley A Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Hudler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly H
Boots/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kathy M Lynn/Corp/Enron@Enron, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St. Claire, Janet
H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: i have 4 tickets to diana ross at rodeo tonight that probably can't
use. any takers?

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


Dave,

Here is the website that has all restaurants in Houston. In addition, it has info on events and other things going on in Houston. For restaurants look on the left site and they are categorized by cuisine, neighborhood, or price.

http://houston.citysearch.com/?brand=sidewalk

Monika


Here is a copy just for completeness.

HK
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 06/19/2002
11:43 AM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
06/19/2002 11:15 AM
To: Jim Mikel/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Perryman/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Harvey Kaura/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Lindquist/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: LB1 SPC Analytic

Attached please find a new Statistical Process Control analytic which
displays the turbine performance for your site.  The report pdf is a summary
of the other two reports and delineates which turbines fall outside the 2
sigma line for each category.  The other two reports provide more detail
regarding the turbine performance including the degree to which a turbine
falls outside the 2 sigma line.

Please note that we are still working with the analytic and you will find
some extraneous characters in the results.  Please add these characters in
with the main group for which they are intended.  We will have them removed
from the code next month.

Best Regards,
Hollis


Opps. Sorry about the confusion.  We are selling the equity in CA to Coral,
so I call it by that name.  I'm looking for a list of what you need as
referencedin the last line of this email.

Hope that helps,

Kay

"Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com> on 12/04/2000 01:37:49 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com>

Subject: Attached Files

Kay,
   Attached are the latest versions of the CA Energy Development
breakout agreements.  Please note that, because the agreements deal with
only one Unit each, the term "Unit Liability Amount" has been replaced
with "Maximum Liability Amount."  Also, there is no need for an Exhbit
N-1, so that reference has been deleted as well.  The agreement is still
missing an Agreement Reference number, Ben Jacoby's fax number, and the
information needed for the exhibits.  Thanks, Chris
 <<break out agreement--CA Energy Devlopment II (12/4/00).DOC>>  <<break
out CA Energy Dev. I  (12/4/00).DOC>>
 - 00).DOC
 - 00).DOC


approved

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Dennis
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:46 AM
To:	Bodnar, Michael; Buehler, Craig; Cherry, Paul; Dasilva, Esther; Donoho, Lindy; Frazier, Perry; Lee, Dennis; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Sheffield, Sandy; White, Angela; Y'barbo, Paul; McConnell, Mark
Subject:	Credit Approval Oneok Bushton Processing, Inc.

Credit Approval Requested:

Shipper :		Oneok Bushton Processing, Inc.
Contract # :		25374
Service Type :	FT
MDQ:			12,000 Dth/d
Rate:			$0.10
Term:			March 1, 2002 through March 31, 2002

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


Tell us where to send your FREE RAZOR AM/FM RADIO and ALARM CLOCK
https://www.globaltravel.com/ssl/nonagent/preferredshoppersedge.asp?club=3D=
107&banner=3D9&aff=3D100&sub1=3D65

Now you can claim a FREE RAZOR AM/FM RADIO and ALARM CLOCK, that's
yours to keep just for trying PREFERRED SHOPPER'S EDGE for 30 days.
Quantities are limited so click on the link below and complete the
form within the next 48 hours so that we can ship it to you immediately.

Yours FREE just for trying the Preferred Shopper=92s Edge 30-day
no-risk trial membership!
https://www.globaltravel.com/ssl/nonagent/preferredshoppersedge.asp?club=3D=
107&banner=3D9&aff=3D100&sub1=3D65

The Razor Radio comes with cloth covered powerful dynamic dual
speakers that are acoustically engineered and designed for superb
sound. Metal telescopic antenna and AC jack included. Use as a
table-top radio with detachable pedestal base or as a wall mount
radio by utilizing the wall mounts on the back of the radio. Set
the built in LCD alarm clock to wake you in the morning. It=92s
handy anywhere in your home or makes a great gift. Plus, you can
sample all of our money-saving membership benefits FREE for 30 days.

As a member of PREFERRED SHOPPER'S EDGE you can immediately start
saving on:

300,000 brand name Electronics, Appliances and Household Merchandise
-Discount Movie Tickets
-Flowers and Gifts
-Discount Home Services
-Magazines
-Discount Tires and Rims
-Automobile Quotation and Purchasing
-And So Much More!

This offer is risk-free and registration only takes a minute.
Remember, the FREE RAZOR AM/FM RADIO and ALARM CLOCK is yours to
keep, just for trying us out. Your satisfaction is guaranteed!

Get It Now!
https://www.globaltravel.com/ssl/nonagent/preferredshoppersedge.asp?club=3D=
107&banner=3D9&aff=3D100&sub1=3D65

(Offer open to U.S. Residents only & credit card customers only. A
small $1.00 shipping & handling charge applies)

=20

Your privacy is very important to us. You requested to
receive this mailing, by registering with Premium Offers
or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners.
As the market leader in permission-based email
marketing, we are committed to delivering our members
outstanding offers that include specials on hot new
products, entertainment, and money-making ideas. We
hope to continue to bring you great offers over the
web in the future. However, if you wish to unsubscribe
please click below:
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=3Dnewexpectations&email=3Djschwie@en=
ron.com=20
or
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=3Dnewexpectations=20
and enter your email address (jschwie@enron.com)


We have had difficulty setting the meeting given the election.  However, we
should have a position ready for any meeting, including the meetings we are
trying to arrange for you in November.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	10/24/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: t.briggs@enron.com
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Cal-ISO Wants Pwr Generators To Forward Bid 70% -Sources

The trading flooor needs to formulate a position on this first.  When is your
meeting Tom?

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/24/2000 01:05 PM CDT
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Cal-ISO Wants Pwr Generators To Forward Bid 70% -Sources

Can everyone help Tom respond within Congress to this message?  Tom, also be
forewarned that FERC intends to announce their "proposed remedies" on Nov 1
with about 15 days for response.  We need you guys to be ready for messaging
this politically.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 01:03 PM -----

	Tom Briggs
	10/24/2000 12:32 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cal-ISO Wants Pwr Generators To Forward Bid 70% -Sources

It seem sthat the Cal Iso has lost its mind.  Cynthia and I have been trading
phone calls with Bilbray's staff to schedule a meeting.  In the event we can
get one, can I have help rebutting this stuff.  It seems that the England and
Wales Pool, which effectively compelled 100% bidding in the day ahead market
was still frought with gaming between the day ahead market and the within day
balancing market.
----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/24/2000 11:22 AM -----

	Cynthia Sandherr
	10/24/2000 10:32 AM

		 To: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cal-ISO Wants Pwr Generators To Forward Bid 70% -Sources

Tom:  when we meet with Congressman Bilbray's staff, is this something we
should bring up and have a position on....I would assume yes......but wanted
to close the loop.....
--

Cal-ISO Wants Pwr Generators To Forward Bid 70% -Sources
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

By JASON LEOPOLD
     Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

     LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Independent System Operator is
expected to file a petition with federal regulators Friday seeking authority
to force generators to bid 70% of their supply into the forward market in an
effort to reduce wholesale power costs in the state, according to a source
familiar with the issue.

     An official with the state's Electricity Oversight Board confirmed the
details of the filing.

     The filing calls for FERC to set a "just and reasonable" rate for a
large fraction of suppliers' capacity, while remaining supply would be able
to earn market-based rates, according to the source.

     In addition, major out-of-state generators would have to enter into
forward contracts at FERC mandated rates for "a significant portion of their
expected sales."

     ISO Chairman and Chief Executive Terry Winter will hold a news
conference Friday morning that will focus on possible solutions to lower
wholesale energy costs. He is expected to announce how bidding into the
forward market will stabilize high wholesale power costs.

     The state's Public Utilities Commission is expected to make a similar
filing with federal regulators in the near future, sources said.

     In addition, forcing generators to bid into the forward market is a
measure that would reduce market power in the state and would protect a
majority of utilities served by the generators from the cost impact of
market power, the ISO has said in prior meetings.

     Market power is a term used by economists to describe how generators
can influence power prices. According to an ISO report, market power
occurred this past summer because tight power supply and concentration of
generation ownership "allowed suppliers to be pivotal at relatively high
demand periods."

     About 50% to 60% of the power purchased this past summer was done in
the spot market, an unusually high percentage, according to the ISO.

     In order to mitigate market power, the filing calls for utilities to
enter into two-year forward contracts with generators to shield against the
daily market price fluctuations.

     Regulatory constraints associated with forward contracting was a "key
source of high (power) costs in the summer of 2000," according to an ISO
report.

     The ISO action will be taken without approval from a the grid
operator's board of governors. Usually, a majority of the board is required
to approve such an action.

     EOB Official Surprised By ISO Action

     The announcement of the ISO's expected filing came as a surprise to
Gary Heath, executive director of the state's Electricity Oversight Board.
Heath told Dow Jones Newswires he was aware of the filing and news
conference.

     "We're trying to find out what's behind this," Heath told Dow Jones
Newswires. "We're not sure if they could do this without board approval. It
came as a surprise."

     Sources said the agency is holding the news conference in an attempt to
eclipse imminent structural changes to the ISO expected to be proposed by
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission next month.

     FERC launched an investigation into California's troubled power market
this past summer based on allegations that the market isn't workably
competitive and participants manipulate the market. Energy officials have
blamed the ISO for this summer's power woes.

     -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com

     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 20-10-00

     0307GMT

Michael E. Nix
Michael E. Nix Consulting
menix@gateway.net
1545 18th St. NW #711
Washington, DC  20036
202.234.1086
202.422.3565-cell


TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line X the second week of
May, potentially May 7th and 8th requiring a reduction in receipt volumes
into the pipe between West Texas and Ft. Worth.

TXU LSP will be performing smart pig maintenance activities on Line V the
3rd week of May, potentially May 21st and 24th, requiring shut in of
receipts between Groesbeck & Iola.  Also, on May 24, the Midcon point will
be down.

TXU LSP will be performing line replacement on Line V4, affecting only the
Dow interconnect and the Crosstex interconnect in Ft. Bend Co.

Due to system constraints all Shippers must stay within contract swing
limits.

Imbalance makeup may be scheduled with prior approval from your
Transportation Administrator.

In our ongoing effort to keep TXU Lone Star Pipeline customers aware of
current Daily Available Capacity on our system, TXU Lone Star Pipeline is
pleased to provide you an estimate of available capacity on the TXU Lone
Star Pipeline system.  This is a Microsoft Excel document.  Simply click on
the attachment to view or download to your hard drive.  If you wish to be
removed from this notification, or if you wish to add another person from
your organization, please provide your name, company name, e-mail address
and/or fax number to David Flowers at 214-875-2092 (or via e-mail at
davidflowers@txu.com). TXU Lone Star Pipeline shall not be liable for any
Customers' failure to receive such e-mails. The information transmitted is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

(See attached file: TXULSP Avail Cap Elec Gen.xls)


yes.

	Michael McDonald@ECT
	10/06/2000 03:28 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: [Fwd: CMUA Market Reform proposal]

do you have it?


Gracie,

This is one of the ones I cancelled, since I haven't taken Wellhead to Burner
Tip yet.

Thanks,

Kay

Ernie@ECT
06/07/2000 07:56 AM
Sent by: Gracie S Presas@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@CORP
cc:

Subject: Development Center Class Reminder  - Basics of Risk Management

You are scheduled to attend:

Basics of Risk Management
Class Days and Times:
  6/15/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  6/16/2000  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
Room # & Location: EB552,  Houston
Participant Fee: $ 600
Note:

If you are unable to attend this class, the registration must be canceled by
5:00 p.m. on  June 12, 2000 to prevent a charge of $ 600 to your RC number.

 We look forward to seeing you at 08:00:00 AM on June 15 - 16, 2000.  Please
call the Development Center Team at 713-853-0357 if you have any questions.

 Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:58 PM -----

	"Smith, Charles" <Charles.Smith@alcoa.com>
	04/17/2001 11:45 AM

		 To: "BETTYE L. (E-mail)" <blanghem@anthonysylvan.com>, "Rowan, Brenda"
<Brenda.Rowan@alcoa.com>, "Gensler, Christina" <Christina.Gensler@alcoa.com>,
"Pistorius, Courtney C." <Courtney.Pistorius@alcoa.com>, "Dan J Hyvl
(E-mail)" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Muzny, George A."
<George.Muzny@alcoa.com>, "Kaderka, Darvin J." <Darvin.Kaderka@alcoa.com>,
"Jennifer (E-mail)" <jhefti1528@aol.com>, "Larry&Ann (E-mail)"
<lvlindley@earthlink.net>, "Frei, Laura (ISC at Alcoa)"
<Laura.Frei@alcoa.com>, "Leroy Phillips (E-mail)" <dimedollar@hotmail.com>,
"S-Y RANCH (E-mail)" <SYRANCH@JUNO.COM>, "Matous, Walter" <MatouW@alcoa.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Texas Ranch Hand

Subject: Texas Ranch Hand

>  There once was a successful rancher who died and left everything to
his
> devoted wife. She was determined to keep the ranch and make a go of
it, but
> she knew very little about ranching, so she decided to place an ad in
the
> newspaper for a ranch hand.
>
> Two men applied for the job. One was gay and the other a drunk. She
thought
> long and hard about it, and when no one else applied, she decided to
hire
> the gay guy, figuring it would be safer to have him around the house
than
> the drunk.
>
> He turned out to be fantastic worker, worked long hard hours every day
and
> knew a lot about ranching. For weeks the two of them worked, and the
ranch
> was doing really well. Then one day the rancher's wife said to the
hired
> hand, "You have done a really good job and the ranch looks great, you
> should go into town and kick up your heels."
>
> The hired hand agreed readily, and Saturday night went to town.
However:
> One o'clock came and he didn't return.
> Two o'clock and still no hired hand
> Two-thirty, finally, in came the hired hand.
>
> The rancher's wife was sitting by the fireplace and quietly called him
over
> to her.

> "Unbutton my blouse and take it off," she said. Trembling, he did as
she
> asked.

> "Now take off my boots." He did so, slowly.

 "Now take off my socks." He did.

> "Now take off my skirt." He did.

 "Now take off my bra." Again with trembling hands he did as she asked.

 "Now," she said, "take off my panties."

 He slowly pulled them down. Then she looked at him and said, "Don't you
ever
> wear my clothes to town again!


Andre Vatour at Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast, has suggested you try Serge
Gloutnay of his firm who does derivatives work @ 514.878.5547.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 08/30/2000 08:48
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           08/29/2000 05:08 PM

To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Hydro Quebec

Hydro Quebec is not only a provincial utility, it is owned by the Government
of Quebec and its business and affairs will be governed by Quebec civil law
(all other jurisdictions in Canada are common law jurisdictions) which is
generally foreign to non-Quebec lawyers.  Also, unless you are uniquely
successful at your negotiations, I expect that HQ will insist on the
guarantee being governed by Quebec law.  Accordingly, I agree that Quebec
counsel should be involved in looking at the guarantee and isues of
authority, capacity, execution, delivery, enforceability, etc.  In fact a
legal opinion may be appropriate.

As to Quebec counsel, I would suggest the following:

1.  Andre Vautour @ Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast in Montreal @
514.878.5595.  Andre acted for us us the Papier Mason transaction and I would
recommend him to you.
2.  Xeno Martis @ Fasken Martineau DuMoulin in Montreal @ 514.397.7509.  Xeno
acted for Bank of Nova Scotia on our financing of the Papier Masson
transaction and I would also recommend him to you.
3.  Fred Erickson at Stikeman Elliott in Calgary (who is well known to Mark
T) @ 403.266.9016.  Fred is located in Calgary, but he could refer you to
someone in his firm's Montreal or Quebec City office.  I personally do not
know anyone in particular at either Stikeman's Montreal or Quebec City
offices.

Let me know if I can be of any assistance or how things turn out.

Regards, Peter.

MARY COOK
08/29/2000 09:10 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hydro Quebec

Tana and I will be working on an ISDA for financial derivs with a US trading
affiliate of Hydro Quebec (which I understand to be a provincial utility)
wherein HQ will be a guarantor.  Because this raises a number of issues we
will need Quebec counsel.  Please advise of some good choices.  Thank you.
Mary


let's bring him in

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	10/02/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wabash Valley called re: AEP filing

Don Morton, general counsel of Wabash Valley Power Association, a co-op in
AEP's area, called me about Enron's protest of AEP's market based rates
filing.  Wabash has filed an appeal in the DC Circuit of AEP/CSW merger (its
brief is due 11/20).  He thinks FERC is out of control and not carrying on
its duties.  Wabash is also preparing a protest of the Alliance compliance
filing (due this Friday 10/6) on the following grounds:

Filing is really a continuation of pancaking
Does not want FERC to approve on a "conditional" basis (expecting Alliance to
be a true RTO)--Wabash thinks that Alliance simply creates a larger profit
center for AEP's transmission system

Mr. Morton also had some specific OASIS problem examples that happened to
Wabash that involved preferential treatment for AEP.  I told him to call or
email Scott Miller for the investigation.

Mr. Morton and Wabash CEO, Ed Martin, would like to come to Houston to visit
with Enron about our concerns and about the possibility of making some joint
filings.  His number is 317-481-2815.  Please let me know if I should set
something up or if someone else would like to talk with him directly.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:50 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

The Agreements between Enron Energy Services, Inc. and Green Power Partners I LLC, are for a term endinging December 31, 2002.  The Agreement between Fetzer Vineyards and Enron Energy Services, Inc. is for a term ending April 30, 2002.  The Agreement between Lost Arrow, Inc. (Patagonia) and Enron Energy Services, Inc. is for a term ending December 31, 2002.

Additionally,  Enron Energy Services, Inc. has entered into various agreement(s) with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. to sell additional "green tickets" from the Greeen Power Partners I LLC facilities in California:

EESI sells to EPMI, 1MW ATC, through December 31, 2001 (EPMI sells to EEMC)
EPMI sells to EEMC, 1MW ATC, through June 30, 2003
EESI sells to EPMI, 21 MW's, Sundays Off Peak, through December 31, 2002 (EPMI sells to LADWP)
EESI sells to EPMI, 14 MW's, Sundays ATC, through December 31, 2002 (EPMI sells to LADWP)

I do not know for sure how whether or not EPMI still plans to deliver to EEMC and/or LADWP, however if they plan to continue these sales and depending on our decision relative to Fetzer Vineyards and/or Lost Arrow, Inc. (Patagonia), we may want to keep the Green Power Partners I LLC Agreement alive.  I have discussed the EPMI deals with LADWP with Chris Foster, EPMI Portland Office and am currently awaiting an answer from Chris as to the current status with LADWP.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Richard Ring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

In this case there is a product element because at least the 2 retail contracts I named require us to serve green. If we assume them, we have to have green to serve.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frazier, Lamar
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:59 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

I thought the call on whether a contract is rejected was an economic call and not a product call.  If this is not the case then could we be forced to swallow the other discount off tariff contracts we  intend to reject?

Further, we need to know what the revenue is against this purchase to make a call on the economics.

Richard - Do you have the Patagonia Contract? And/or any of the other green power transactions that EES has entered into with customer's?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike D.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:50 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.; Ring, Richard; ','
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Sounds like the economic justification for rejection is clear.  However, we need to be sure that we are not going to keep any customers where we have a contractual requirement to serve green power (Fetzer; Patagonia).  If we are comfortable that we are not, I think we can reject.

MDS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blachman, Jeremy
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:47 PM
To:	Smith, Mike D.; Frazier, Lamar; Schwarz, Angela; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Merril, Deborah D.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

take a look at this. Unless there is a customer or regulatory reason to keep this, PPA, it would seem to me that we would want to reject this contract.

Thoughts/comments so we can proceed.

Jeremy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

FYI...  Hope this helps in your decision making. - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perry, Todd
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:10 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	RE: Green Power Partners

Murry,

Our forward curves show SP-15 power at $26.57/MWh for the period 02/01/2002-12/31/2002 (note that this does not include the discount for unit-contingency that usually accompanies wind power).  Green tags trade in the market for about $1.50/MWh.  Under the "Green Tickets Sales Agreement" it appears that EES has agreed to pay $39/MWh minus the market price of power, which is approximately $12/MWh for Green Tickets using our forward curves.

Let me know if you need any additional information.

Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'Neil, Murray P.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:15 PM
To:	Blachman, Jeremy; Smith, Mike D.; Perry, Todd; Richter, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

Attached you will find two agreements EES has with ENRON Wind.

1- Green Ticket Purchase Sale Agreement (PPA)
2- Scheduling Coordinator Service Agreement

With EES & ENA bankruptcy and the fact that Enron Wind has not been paid for the generation back to the month of November through current, Enron Wind is attempting to move their needs to APX for SC Services.  I also think they were looking for someone else to purchase their energy.

I put a temporary stop on their actions but we are going to need to review these contracts to determine if we want to continue operating under them.

Please let me know your thoughts as soon as possible.

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:47 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	FW: Green Power Partners

aka Enron Wind.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choate, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:39 PM
To:	Weatherspoon, Patricia
Subject:	Green Power Partners

 << File: Green Tkt Sales Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>  << File: Green Tkt Sched Agrmnt_Green_Pwr_Prtnrs.pdf >>

Chris Choate
Enron Networks
(713) 853-7370


Folks, you are the remaining officers of ENA that have not yet enrolled in
this mandated training program.  It is ENA's goal to have all its officers
through the program before the end of calendar year 2000.  The course has
received very high marks for effectiveness.  Please take time now to enroll
in the program. Speak to your HR representative if you need help getting
signed up.

Regards
Delainey


Daren -

Could you please resolve this issue for Howard?  I will be out of the office
the next two days.
When this is done, please let George know. Thanks.

Aimee
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 01:27 PM
---------------------------

Howard B Camp
12/15/99 01:01 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter 1431 - Nov 1999

Aimee,
Sitara Deal 92943 for meter 1431 has expired on Oct 31, 1999 .  Settlements
is unable to draft an invoice for this deal.  This deal either needs to be
extended or a new deal needs to be set up.  Please let me know when this is
resolved.  We need it resolved by Friday, Dec 17.
HC


[IMAGE]    Hi, PHILLIP!  Within the last few weeks you received an introduction to your membership in The Opt in NetworkTM from Open2Win.  We welcome you to The Opt in Network and promise to commit ourselves to delivering you a highly rewarding online experience with offers that include discounts, bargains, special offers, and sweepstakes, along with entertainment, travel and financial opportunities.  Let us extend a warm welcome by offering you one last opportunity to redeem your $5 Gift Certificate at MagazineRewards.com. Cash in your gift certificate now .    That?s only part of our new member welcome gift: If you redeem your $5 gift certificate TODAY, we will set you up with FREE 3-day, 2-night accomodations  in a luxurious top-brand hotel or resort in one of over 32 U.S. destinations (and even the Bahamas!)   [IMAGE]  There?s no strings attached. Click Here Now  to cash in your certificate at MagazineRewards.com, and start planning for your indulgent mini-vacation in a city near you.  Click To redeem you $5 Gift Certificate   With its millions of subscribers, The Opt in Network has strong negotiating power?that?s why only we can offer you exclusive deals like this. When you receive mail from The Opt in Network, you know it?s worth opening.  Again, welcome to The Opt in Network!  Warmest regards,  The Opt in Network Subscriber Team  If for some reason you choose not to participate in The Opt in Network and get free and heavily discounted offers, please click here    or send an email with remove as the subject to remove@opthost.com.   Smart Deals, Just a Click Away!

  [IMAGE]++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++  This email is not sent unsolicited. This is a Open2Win mailing!  This message is sent to subscribers ONLY.  The e-mail address you subscribed with is: pallen@enron.com  To unsubscribe please click here. or Send an mail with remove as the subject to remove@opthost.com  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 08943A37-C26C-43AE-897A-13856DF90795


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 02:10
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           12/19/2000 01:19 PM

To: John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Tate/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Report on National Fuel Order No. 637 Compliance - Dec. 19 Telephone
Conference

FYI.  At the last technical conference, National Fuel agreed to provide two
hours notice on intra-day recalls, up from their one-hour proposal.  We will
track their filing to make sure they don't file something else.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
01:16 PM ---------------------------

"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on 12/19/2000 09:40:01 AM
To: <Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Report on National Fuel Order No. 637 Compliance - Dec. 19 Telephone
Conference

David Reitz of National Fuel indicated that the pipeline is back to its
position before the last technical conference with regard to keeping the TBF
fee a part of the imbalance resolution process as opposed to making it a
separate service.  As a fall back position, National Fuel will seek guidance
from FERC as to whether it should be made into a new service.  To make PA OCA
happy, David Reitz indicated that any future proposal will incorporate the
50-50 sharing that is in the current proposal.

National Fuel plans to make a revised pro forma tariff filing in mid-January
and inform FERC that this filing resulted from the collaborative effort of
parties to the proceeding.  The filing will have reservation of rights
language that preserves National Fuel's right to file something completely
different when it files to place the revised tariff sheets into effect.
Prior to making the filing, National Fuel will circulate the explanatory
transmittal letter and pro forma tariff sheets, and will flag any changes
made to the pro forma tariff sheets.  This pre-filing circulation should
occur some time during the first two weeks in January.

Nothing was said about the intra-day recall provisions.

>>> <Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com> 12/18/00 03:39PM >>>

Yes, please.  I have another meeting, so I probably won't be able to dial
in.  What are the directions, just in case?

Let me know if they try to make any changes in the intraday recall
provisions.

Thanks.

"Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on 12/18/2000 02:12:24 PM

To:   <Rebecca.W.Cantrell@enron.com>
cc:   "Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com>
Subject:  National Fuel Order No. 637 Compliance - Dec. 19 Telephone
      Conference

Do you want us to participate in the telephone conference tomorrowat 10:00
Eastern time?  I haven't seen any revised tariff sheets, so I'm not quite
sure what will be discussed besides National Fuel's decision not to make
the TBF service a separate service.


stephanie renino
1193 hope st 5
stamford, CT 06907
srenino@netscape.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

stephanie renino


Please send it to me.
john

From: Julie Pechersky/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 09:33 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: bloomberg

John,
We are trying to transfer your bloomberg account and need to know who within
Enron North America can sign-off on this
contract.  Would that be you?  Or do you have a legal department that we
should forward it to?  We initially changed the
name on it and had it signed under Enron Corp which is where the majority of
our Bloomberg contracts lie, but because
you can actually execute trades from the system that you are now using, it
has to be under your departments name
and we need someone to sign the contract.

Let me know.

Thanks,
Julie

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "ALLYSON FELLER, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <AFELLER@bloomberg.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22ALLYSON+20FELLER+2C+20BLOOMBERG_+20NEW+20YORK+22+20+3CAF
ELLER+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:03 PM
To: JPECHER@ENRON.COM
Subject: bloomberg

Hi Julie. I noticed the contracts have been received.  However, "North
America"
has been crossed off the contract. That is the name it was signed under and
still the current trading name for Emissions and Natural gas. Not sure if it
was a mistake or not. Anyway - please get back to me when you can. I am going
to try to set up a meeting with the gas guys for tomorrow 4/17. Thanks


I see no effective objection to what the ISO proposes.  I am surprised they
have not produced the material sooner.  Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 9:56 AM
To: Mary.Hain@enron.com; Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com;
gfergus@brobeck.com; mday@gmssr.com; rcarroll@bracepatt.com;
Alan.Comnes@enron.com
Cc: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; James.D.Steffes@enron.com
Subject: CAISO Notice: Message to Market Participants and Scheduling
Coord inators regarding CA ISO compliance with the EOB and CPUC
subpoenas -- FOR YOUR INFORMATION

The ISO plans to comply with recent EOB and CPUC subpoenas unless FERC or a
court tells them not to.  DO we care about this?

Question for  Mary and Ron -- Are they trying to get around the FERC--
given the CPUC's filing there asking for authority to get info?

Also, as Mary is aware, the WPTF will be submitting a protest to SCE's
request to FERC to have the ISO's MSC release data to SCE that the MSC
claims identify those who have abused market power.

----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 09:47 AM -----

"Fuller, Don"

<DFuller@cais        To:     ISO Market Participants

o.com>
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PAR
TICIPANTS@cai
Sent by:             so.com>

"Happ, Susan"        cc:

<SHapp@caiso.        Subject:     CAISO Notice: Message
to Market Participants and Scheduling Coord inators
com>                 regarding CA ISO compliance with
the EOB and CPUC subpoenas

12/13/2000

07:52 AM

Please

respond to

"Sole,

Jeanne"

To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The CA ISO believes it has complied with its obligations under CA ISO
Tariff
section 20.3.4 as to the December 4 EOB subpoena and the September 21 CPUC
subpoena.  Our reasoning is explained in the attached letter.  Accordingly,
the CA ISO will comply with the EOB and  CPUC subpoenas on December 20
unless it receives and order to the contrary from a court or the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission.

In addition, the CA ISO has received requests from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission and the state agencies for information on generator
unit outages.  This information is not subject to tariff section 20.3.4
which protects only Generator Outage programs.  Nonetheless, the CA ISO is
providing this notice as a curtesy matter.  The CA ISO will provide the
requested information to FERC and the state agencies.  The CA ISO has in
the
past requested confidential treatment for information on the cause of an
outage and projected in service date since this information could be used
by
Market Participants to manipulate the market, and it will make such a
request as to cause and in service dates in the context of the current
requests.

Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

(See attached file: 12-12letter to genfinal.doc)


Shawn, just a little buried - why don't you come by on Monday. Kay please
schedule.

Regards
Delainey


Dear Wall Street Journal Subscriber,

Because you are a subscriber to the best business news, information and analysis in print, you qualify for a very special offer for The NEW Wall Street Journal Online! Now you can get one FULL year of The Wall Street Journal Online for ONLY $29!

Simply go to http://pull.xmr3.com/p/9170-C2DE/32570475/http-wsj.com-subscribe2925.html and try it out for the first two weeks without being billed.

The New Wall Street Journal Online is now easier to use and more personally relevant:

* FASTER - Get continously updated news and information from the editors of the Journal and follow top stories throughout the day.
* MORE MOBILE - Log on for the news you need while you're traveling and stay informed wherever business takes you.
* SMARTER - Dig deeper into the day's news using company information and related links included with articles.
* EASIER - Find what you need more easily with improved navigation and spend less time searching.
* SEARCH PAST EDITIONS - With access to articles from the past 30 days, you'll never miss a story.
* ACCESS TO BARRONS ONLINE - Enjoy daily updates on the timely analysis and market commentary you get every week in Barron's.

Your Wall Street Journal Online subscription is completely risk-free. If you don't like what you see, cancel with no obligation.

Less than 8 cents per day AND two weeks without being billed! Why wouldn't you just give it a try? Go to http://pull.xmr3.com/p/9170-C2DE/32570475/http-wsj.com-subscribe2925.html

You have absolutely nothing to lose and potentially.....a lot of capital gain!

Subscribe Now!

This message is being sent by WSJ.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Occasionally, we use e-mail for fast, paperless communications
with our customers.  If you do not wish to receive these notices in the
future, please visit our Web site at:
http://subscribe.wsj.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?ID=EJ&A=070798097401 and indicate your preferences.

K-1-729916-4450256-2-9170-US1-76118734


Eric,
    Do you have any ballpark idea about where an offer might come in?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Pryor, Tony; Wilkie, Kim
Cc:	Hill, Robert; McCarty, Danny
Subject:	ANNGTC

Tony + Kim,

Several of the rejoining partners of ANNGTC have contacted me asking if Enron is interested in selling its residual claims.  The answer is most definitely affirmative.  Please advise on the following-

What are the bankruptcy court's requirements to undertake a mandated auction?
Is it possible through the bankruptcy court to extinguish liability claims arising prior to NAGC's withdrawal from the ANNGTC partnership?  If so, how?

Here's how I would like to proceed-
Prepare an offering letter that identifies what we are selling and preferred terms + conditions
Distribute to each partner, possibly other interested parties (ANS producers)
Obtain bids and evaluate best offer

I would like to begin the sales process asap and would appreciate your feedback most urgently.


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Industrial Markets
Metal Bulletin - Iron and Steel Awards for 2000
Pushiest Entrant: Enron, the US commodity trading company, which promised it
would revolutionize the steel business by offering futures in hot rolled coil
via its online market place.

The EIM Fundamentals Analysis group is excited to announce that Dave Allan
has joined as a Director, responsible for all Forest Products lines.  He
comes to EIM with 20 years of experience in the Forest Products industry, of
which 14 were spent at Abitibi and 6 with Pulp and Paper Week.  Please join
us in welcoming Dave.

The Siebel Team (&The Force8) continues to work towards program
implementation of its customer management system in early May, with training
to begin at the end of April.  Stay tuned for updates.

Enron Global LNG
Enron Global LNG is positioning itself to be a creator and leader of a global
wholesale LNG market.  The rising prices of natural gas in the United States
and concerns over future energy supplies have created a bullish outlook for
LNG in the U.S. and around the globe.   LNG has played a major role in
serving energy needs in many parts of the world, but its place in the U.S.
energy picture has been limited. An LNG market that spans the globe can
supply vast amounts of otherwise stranded gas to the world,s growing appetite
for cleaner burning fuels.   Enron Global LNG sees great opportunity for
Enron,s wholesale energy business model to help shape yet another energy
market.

IN THE NEWS

Enron Corp. Says First-Quarter Profit Rose 20 Percent
Houston, April 17 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the largest energy trader, said
first-quarter profit rose 20 percent as sales almost quadrupled. Profit from
operations rose to $406 million, or 47 cents, from $338 million, or 40 cents,
in the year-earlier period.  Enron raised its 2001 profit forecast to $1.75
to $1.80 a share, from its January projection of $1.70 to $1.75.

First-quarter revenue surged to $50.1 billion from $13.1 billion as Enron
boosted the volume of power sold in North America by 90 percent. Enron had a
first-quarter gain of $19 million, or 2 cents a share, for an accounting
change, making net income $425 million, or 49 cents a share. There were no
charges or gains in the year-earlier period.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM - Janelle Russell,
EIM   - David Allan, Sylvia Carter
ENA  - Sasha Divelbiss, Amy Quirsfeld, Judy Zhang, Annette Thompson, Kelly
Donlevy-Lee, Grant Patterson

Transfers (to or within)
ENA ) William Abler, Magdalena Cruz, Barbara Taylor, James Reyes, Marvin
Carter, Angel Tamariz, Jesse Bryson
EIM ) Cassandra Dutton, Christine Sullivan, Camille Gerard, Sherri Kathol,
Jennifer Watson
EGM ) Steven Batchelder

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


Either way.  Just let us know when so that we can either do it,  or monitor
to make sure that the books are not impacted.

Thanks

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           04/23/2001 10:54 AM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA Assignment

Not yet.  They will need to be moved once we get sign-offs from the right
people.  Would you rather we had them moved systematically or should we go
through the Book Admins?

Joe

Jeffrey C Gossett
04/23/2001 10:51 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA Assignment

Does this mean they are being moved systematically?

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           04/23/2001 10:42 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA Assignment

Is anyone handling this Clinton Energy/EES assignment?  All deal nos. on the
attachment are still booked between ENA and Clinton.  They will be moved to
EES and RMT.

Thanks,
Joe

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
10:39 AM ---------------------------

Sheri L Wallace@EES
04/20/2001 02:48 PM
To: Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Weithman/DUB/EES@EES, Scott
Mills/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ron Surwill/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: ENA Assignment


Thanx for Nav's address. Congrats on the CFA. Cowan just finished level 2. I
don't think I'm going to take it after watching the hell he went through.

Chris


Richard asked me to send you this letter for Dave Delainey.


We didn't go.  Two commercial guys did.  If I hear anything, I'll let you know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landwehr, Susan M.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:24 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Kaufman, Paul
Subject:	W speech

Hey--which one of you went to the Prez's speech today?  Did he do ok?  Any comments on energy policy?


Mike, obviously this is unacceptable.  Norm's exhibit contains factual
inaccuracies we cannot live with.  I'm assuming the rest of the group will
react similarly and Norm will be stuck filing his own exhibit.  Your thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/16/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

"Norman A. Pedersen" <napedersen@JonesDay.com> on 06/16/2000 01:08:18 AM
To: "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC" <BCherry@sempra.com>
cc: "'Pocta, Robert M.'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Cherry, Brian - TPBKC"
<BCherry@sempra.com>, "'AlexanMS@sce.com'" <AlexanMS@sce.com>,
"'paulamirault@aec.ca'" <paulamirault@aec.ca>, "'david.bayless@utility.com'"
<david.bayless@utility.com>, "'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com'"
<Tomb@crossborderenergy.com>, "'Burkee@cts.com'" <Burkee@cts.com>,
"'Craigc@calpine.com'" <Craigc@calpine.com>,
"'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com'" <Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'Jdasovic@enron.com'" <Jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Mday@gmssr.com'"
<Mday@gmssr.com>, "'bdingwall@unitedgas.com'" <bdingwall@unitedgas.com>,
"'Douglass@arterhadden.com'" <Douglass@arterhadden.com>, "'eke@aelaw.com'"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "'Jfawcet@enron.com'" <Jfawcet@enron.com>,
"'rfoss@coral-energy.com'" <rfoss@coral-energy.com>, "'Gileau, Patrick L.'"
<plg@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'johnj@bcjlaw.com'" <johnj@bcjlaw.com>,
"'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'" <Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu>,
"'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com'" <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com>, "'jleslie@luce.com'"
<jleslie@luce.com>, "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
"'jmpa@dynegy.com'" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "'porterdk@sce.com'"
<porterdk@sce.com>, "'RochmanM@cubjpa.org'" <RochmanM@cubjpa.org>,
"'RochmanM@spurr.org'" <RochmanM@spurr.org>, "'susan.scott@enron.com'"
<susan.scott@enron.com>, "Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB" <RBetonte@socalgas.com>,
"Brill, Thomas R." <TBrill@sempra.com>, "Follett, B. David - TPDBF"
<DFollett@sempra.com>, "Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH"
<JHarrigan@socalgas.com>, "Hay, James E." <JHay@sempra.com>, "Lorenz, Lad -
TPLPL" <LLorenz@socalgas.com>, "McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM"
<NMcVay@socalgas.com>, "Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM" <RMorrow@socalgas.com>,
"Purves, Ralph A." <RPurves@SDGE.com>, "Sakarias, Wayne P."
<WSakarias@SDGE.com>, "Schavrien, Lee" <LSchavrien@sempra.com>, "Sullivan,
Glen J." <GSullivan@sempra.com>, "Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS"
<TSurak@socalgas.com>, "Teeter, James S." <JTeeter@SDGE.com>, "Van Lierop,
Jan - TP2JXV" <tp2jxv@socalgas.com>, "Watson, Steven - TP2SAW"
<SWatson@socalgas.com>, "Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW" <GWright@sempra.com>,
"Barker, David - TPDTB" <DBarker@socalgas.com>, "'How-Downing, Lindsey'"
<lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>, "'Jun, Christine'" <chj@aelaw.com>, "'Khoury,
Dexter'" <bsl@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'ack@aelaw.com'" <ack@aelaw.com>, "Nelson, Eric
B. - TPEBN" <ENelson@socalgas.com>, "Suwara, J.- TPJUS" <JSuwara@sempra.com>,
"Reed, William" <WReed@sempra.com>, "'Pedersen, Norman'"
<napedersen@jonesday.com>, "'Paul, Joe'" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "'Hawiger,
Marcel'" <marcel@turn.org>, "'Fawcett, Jeff'" <jfawcet@enron.com>, "'O'Neill,
Ed'" <ewo@jmbm.com>, "'Power, Pat'" <pjpowerlaw@aol.com>, "'Ramirez, Jaime'"
<jaime.ramirez@swgas.com>, "'Black, Larry'" <larry.black@swgas.com>, "Fair,
Pam" <PFair@SDGE.com>, "'Hall, Rich'" <rch8@pge.com>, "'Eisenman, Eric'"
<EXE3@pge.com>, "'Stoner, Ron'" <rrs5@pge.com>, "'McConn, Kathy'"
<mcconnk@epenergy.com>

Subject: Re: Final Late Exhibit Draft

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

     Your proposed draft exhibit goes substantially beyond the ALJ's order.
ALJ Biren specifically stated that the the late-filed exhibit "should be
narrowly focused on the mismatch of capacity." Tr. 1021.Thus, you need to
eliminate the column entitled "Total Take-away Capacity."  Furthermore, the
column is both suspect (e.g., the representation that EOR is 770 MMcfd) and
misleading (e.g., the inclusion of SWG or PG&E in "S. Calif Take-away
Capacity").  Also, you need to eliminate the "Avg. Daily Market" box.  The
following is what should be submitted to ALJ Biren:
(See attached file: #1070989 v1 - FIRM PIPELINE CAPACITY DELIVERY (EX. TO
I.99-07-003).doc)
 - #1070989 v1 - FIRM PIPELINE CAPACITY DELIVERY (EX. TO I.99-07-003).doc


----------------------------------------------------------------------
August 21, 2000 (AP)
California regulators cut San Diego electricity rates in close vote
MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer

   (08-21) 16:28 PDT SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- With consumers howling about
unexpectedly high electric bills this summer, California's Public Utility
Commission took a step back from deregulation and cut rates for most San
Diego residents by 43 percent, so that most customers will pay no more
than $68 per month through January.
   By a 3-2 margin, the commission also approved a rate cut for small
businesses and school districts, resulting in estimated bills of $220 a
month for customers that don't exceed strict usage limits of 1,500
kilowatt hours.
   "This isn't going to help anybody," muttered San Diego restaurateur Susan
Bauman as she waved a $10,284 electricity bill showing one of her two
businesses used 30,000 kilowatt hours in July.
   PUC Commissioner Henry Duque, who drafted the proposal, said it provides
some relief while encouraging energy conservation, since customers who
exceed the usage limits will have to continue paying market rates.
   Other San Diegans who attended the hearing called the action woefully
inadequate.
   "We are bleeding to death and this will not stop the hemorrhaging," said
San Diego Supervisor Dianne Jacob. "We are going to die unless we get more
help."
   The PUC rejected an alternative proposal that would have imposed price
controls through 2003 and lowered bills by 60 percent from current levels.
   Ed Guiles, CEO of San Diego Gas & Electric Co., said the alternative would
have accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars in deferred costs. With
interest, those costs ultimately would be passed on to customers beginning
in 2004.
   But even the measure that did pass could end up costing San Diego
customers as much as $100 million after 2001, Guiles said.
   "This is an interim solution that stabilizes the bills for consumers but
does not get to the root part of the problem of high energy prices,"
Guiles said.
   Consumer advocates say customers should not be forced to pay for the
higher rates, now or in the future.
   "The proposals are really just a ruse. They move the burden from the
consumers' checkbook to their credit cards to be paid at a future date,"
said Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a
Santa Monica watchdog.
   The deregulation of the state's $20 billion electrical power industry --
imposed under a complex 1996 law that phases in the effects from south to
north -- was supposed to lower prices by creating greater competition.
   But demand has outstripped electricity supplies, due to a growing
population, booming high-tech economy, and less electricity available from
neighboring states that haven't deregulated their systems.
   A sweltering summer in much of California hasn't helped, and cost hikes
and continuing power shortages that caused rolling "brownouts" in the San
Francisco Bay area in June have spurred demands of a repeal.
   Monday's action came at an emergency meeting called at the request of Gov.
Gray Davis, who asked the commission to lower soaring electric bills that
have sparked outrage in California's second largest city -- and fears in
other California regions due to buy electricity on the open market as
early as next year.
   Residential and business customers who receive their power from SDG&E have
seen their electric bills double or even quadruple since their rates were
deregulated in June.
   Jacob and other San Diego-area politicians on hand at San Francisco's
hearings said they were headed to Sacramento to lobby for a state law
proposing to revert rates to 1996 prices. The proposal doesn't specify who
would pay for the rollback.
   Other critics said the PUC's rate limits won't help elderly and sick
people who must run their air conditioning during the hot summer months.
Opponents also warned that small businesses still might have to lay off
employees or move from the area to offset their rising expenses.
   "What we have done is lower the rates for turning on your TV or running
your refrigerator, but basically what we're telling people is, don't turn
on your air conditioner," said PUC Commissioner Carl Wood, who wanted the
steeper rate cut that failed Monday.
   The cap adopted Monday applies to residential customers who limit usage to
500 kilowatts per month. About 70 percent of homes in San Diego fall under
the cap, estimated Duque.
   The prevailing market rate has soared under deregulation.
   On August 13, the average wholesale price for San Diego electricity was
$117 per megawatt hour, up from $25 per megawatt hour at a comparable time
last year, said Wood.
   The estimated $68 cap for residential customers will remain in effect
through January 2001 and then increase to a projected $75 cap through
December 2001.
   The projected $220 cap on electric bills that applies to businesses and
school districts will increase to $240 per month after January.
   Under deregulation, private utilities were required to sell off their
power plants and open their markets to electrical resellers, and buy power
on the open market, paying an amount that may fluctuate from day to day.
   But the state has been shunned by some power developers who are uncertain
about deregulation, and few new power plants are in the works.

   ------=?   On the Net:?   California PUC: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov?   California ISO: http://www2.caiso.com?   Energy Department electricity statistics: http://www.eia.doe.gov?   North American Electric Reliability Council: http://www.nerc.com?   Utility Consumers Action Network: http://www.ucan.org???----------------------------------------------------------------------?Copyright 2000 AP?


I would like to get a copy of the supporting reports for both the IM-Denver
and FT-Denver books on a daily basis.  Please include relevant curveshifts,
new deal reports, change deal reports for the firm book, and curveshift, new
deal reports, change deal reports, revenue and expense comparisons, and top
page (desk level summary).  Also I would like a breakdown of the demand,
commodity and other expense figures and any revenue, reimbursement that will
go in for the first of the month.

Also, I would like an explanation as to how the IM-Denver book lost nearly
$400,000 over the last two days.

Thank you,

Jay


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
09:54 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Chris Connelly                           01/14/2001 11:36 AM

To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace
Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andy James/EU/Enron@Enron, Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT, Dorte
Kjaergaard/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Ryan/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Freight weekly report

Enron Shipping Services Weekly report 02/2001

Highlight

The cape market continues to slide ever southward with owners unable to
repeat last done on rates obtained.  Richards bay to Rotterdam rates have
fallen about $2 in 45 days ( key coal route )  and Brazil to China rates have
fallen $3 in the same period ( key iron ore route ) which has owners running
for cargo  coverage.  However charterers smell blood and are not willing to
enter into freight contracts ( Edf trading and NCSC  are playing spot and so
are we ).  Even the mighty Bocimar seems unable to turn the tide and are
offering us cheap rates on the quiet as they keep playing their vessels spot
and are  being run over.  The average cape rate has lost $ 4200 from its peak
and hangs around $20,400 presently.  To get cargo contracts for the balance
of the year an owner has to fix his vessel at around $16,000 to get
charterers willing to agree.  The downward fall is the result of two
concurrent market shifts 1- coal shipments into Europe have slowed 2- market
is predicting that sometime in Q1 2001 , Japanese steel mills will cut back
on production and reduce their raw material imports.  As a result, you have
on one side, Japanese vessel owners panicking as they fear that their main
account ( Japan ) will not need their vessels shortly and you have the
European owners also worried as they are seeing their utilities postponing
their coal requirements.  Furthermore, the holiday season in Asia is
approaching and little activity is predicted for the next few weeks.

On the panamax front, the outlook is still very bleak as you now have about
two new buildings being launched per week in a market which is currently well
balanced.  In the spot market, the Atlantic is weak as the grain out of the
US gulf is slow as the main rivers are frozen upstream and the vessels have
little to load.  In the east the market is strong as there is a flurry of
grain activity but in the paper market, February is already traded at a big
discount to Jan as people predict a quick slowdown in the activity as Asia
goes on holiday.

On the long term strucutred front, last week we agreed to charter a new cape
building starting in late 2003 for 10 years with an option for an 11th, 12
th, 13 th and 14 th year.  Furthermore, we have the option to buy the vessel
after year 3 at a fixed agreed Japanese yen amount ( if currency goes our
way, we buy the vessel dirt cheap !!!).  The counterparty in Mitsui, a big
and financially strong Japanese company.  The deal is still subject a few
details but we hope to be able to book this deal within the next 5 months
when the ship building contract will be drawn up.

Also last week we had about 6 banks over a period of three days come to our
office to discuss possible opportunities in the shipping world and to get
them to trade on EOL.  Larry Lawyer and Simon Crowe organized the meetings
and we expect a few of these leads to pay off sometime this year.

Market
	Short term	Medium term	Long Term
Handy Max	Down	Down	Down
Panamax	Flat	Flat	Down
Cape Size	Down	Down	Down

Cape

Average time charter rate: $ 20,400
Spot RBCT/Rotterdam: $ 9.30
Spot Tubaro/China: $11.30
Spot Bolivar/Rotterdam: $ 7.35

Panamax

Average time charter rate: $ 11,200
Spot US Gulf/Japan: $21.20

Deals Done
Physical Freight
ECS freight
Fixed a Cape from Keoyang from RBCT/Hunterstone at $9.40
Fixed a Panamax from Norden from Drummond/Liverpool at $ 8.50
Fixed a Panamax from Transfield from Santa marta to Hit at $10.20
Fixed out a panamax to transfield on time charter which was spot open in US
gulf
Third parties freight deals
Sold 4 Cape cargoes to Eastern Rich from Brazil to China at $9.80
OTC
FFA s
Numerous swaps on both the Cape and Panamax routes

EOL
Traded with Cargill, Edf trading, Navios and have now traded over 3 million
tons LTD

Travels
Pierre will be in Paris on Monday but Andy and I should be in all week.

Chris


Lots on CA; EPSA's views; and much from some Enron rep named "Sue Marrow."
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 09:56 AM -----

	US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	10/29/2000 06:17 PM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Monday October 30, 2000

(see attached file:  rt001030.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001030.pdf


Kim,

Thanks for all your help today.  I apologize for my propensity to catch you
away from your desk.  We all have to be good at something, right?  Anyway,
here are the fixed-price volumes associated with a portion of the basis
transactions done in June and Q3.  I'm missing some deal numbers, but I'm
guessing you won't need those.

Deal Number  Month  Date  Volume Price

   June  12/28/2000 50,000 5.320
EU8529.X/67851 June  2/16/2001 50,000 5.530

   July  12/28/2000 50,000 5.340
EU8529.P/67851 July  1/19/2001 50,000 5.630

   August 12/28/2000 50,000 5.290

EU8529.G-L/67851 September 1/10/2001 60,000 6.020
QS5478.1/67851 September 2/16/2001 50,000 5.530

In other news, a few of us, including Art and I, are getting together for
drinks after work tomorrow if you or anyone else is interested.
Coincidentally, the State Bar is the location of choice, so I hope you
aren't State Bar-ed out.  Let us know.  I believe everyone will be swinging
by around 5 or so.

Thanks again,

Charlie Sanchez
Gelber & Associates