Pact With PG&E Eluding Governor
Power: Davis says obstacles include a debt that is double Edison's. Others
cite an aggressive corporate culture as an impediment to state purchase of
grid.
By DAN MORAIN, NANCY RIVERA BROOKS, Times Staff Writers

?????WASHINGTON--As he attempts to finalize a settlement with Southern
California Edison, Gov. Gray Davis said Monday that his effort to rescue a
more recalcitrant Pacific Gas & Electric has been short-circuited by issues
far more difficult than those raised by the state's other two ailing
utilities.
?????PG&E's debt could be as much as $8 billion, Davis indicated--twice the
red ink of Edison, which Friday reached a preliminary agreement to sell its
transmission lines to the state for $2.76 billion to pay off some of its
staggering debt. Davis acknowledged that the Edison deal would mean nothing
unless he was able to reach a twin pact with PG&E.
?????Seasoned utility watchers see PG&E's stubborn negotiating posture as
partly a bargaining ploy and partly the result of underlying business issues
at the San Francisco company.
?????Some cite a more aggressive corporate culture at PG&E than at Edison
that has left PG&E alone on a precarious pinnacle, with bankruptcy on one
side and partial dismembering by the state on the other.
?????Brian Youngberg, senior utility analyst with the Edward Jones investment
firm in St. Louis, said PG&E "has historically pushed the envelope more in
certain situations and that probably reflects their corporate culture.
They're just sticking to their guns."
?????While Edison appears to have rejected bankruptcy law protection as an
option, PG&E has not.
?????Although Davis did not specify the size of PG&E's debt, he said it is
"more than twice the size of Southern California Edison's." As part of the
deal between Davis and Edison, both sides agreed that the utility's debt is
about $4 billion, sources close to the talks have said.
?????"We are making progress" with PG&E, said Davis, attending the annual
National Governors Assn. conference in Washington, D.C. "I want people to
understand it is a far more complicated transaction. . . . It is just going
to take a little longer."
?????Officials at PG&E and its parent, PG&E Corp., declined to publicly
discuss the company's stance, citing the sensitivity of the negotiations.
Company spokesman Ron Low said only that "we expect to meet again this week.
There was no time or date set yet."
?????San Francisco lawyer Michael Kahn, one of Davis' energy advisors, said
the parties "had contact over the weekend" but he declined to elaborate.
?????"We in the governor's office would very much like to reach arrangements
with them and don't want to say anything in public that spoils the
negotiations," he said.
?????PG&E's hard-nosed bargaining stance is no surprise to Wall Street
analysts and consumer advocates who have watched the utility's aggressive
moves to shed its hydroelectric system, now blocked by state law, and to
recoup past electricity and other costs.
?????"It could be a negotiating tactic," said Lori Woodland, an analyst with
Fitch Inc., the credit-rating firm that was the first to drop PG&E and
Edison's debt to junk bond status.
?????"PG&E has the largest piece of the pie" in terms of uncollected
electricity costs, Woodland said. "It could also be just the thought of
having to sacrifice their assets to pay for what ended up being flawed public
policy."
?????Consumer advocate Michael Shames contends that PG&E might believe that a
bankruptcy judge would allow the utility to sell some assets and restructure
its debt in ways that would be preferable to anything the state is offering.
?????"On the other hand, if Edison and [San Diego Gas & Electric] do sign on,
then PG&E almost has to or risk the wrath of the governor and the Public
Utilities Commission for the next seven years," said Shames, executive
director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network in San Diego.
?????Edison is more comfortable in the role of regulated utility than is
PG&E, said Mike Florio, a lawyer with the Utility Reform Network in San
Francisco.
?????"PG&E really seems to hate PUC regulation and wants to get as far away
from it as it can, even if it means taking the company into the tank," said
Florio, who is on the governing board of the California Independent System
Operator, which runs the transmission grid owned by the three utilities.
?????The utilities have amassed more than $12 billion in debt as they paid
record sums for wholesale power last year, but were barred by state
regulators from passing those costs on to California consumers of
electricity.
?????The level of debt is a fundamental part of the negotiations between the
Davis administration and the three private utilities. At least part of that
debt ultimately will be passed on to consumers. While Davis says he opposes
rate hikes, his plan would restructure the rate system by propping up rates
in the coming years, even as electricity costs may fall.
?????Davis on Friday announced the outlines of an accord in which the state
would buy Edison's share of the transmission grid for $2.76 billion. He said
he hopes to make the deal final by week's end with Edison and Sempra, the
parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric.
?????Davis, meanwhile, is scheduled to meet today with U.S. Energy Secretary
Spencer Abraham to outline his plan to take over the transmission grid. The
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission must approve the state takeover of the
grid, and FERC Chairman Kurt Hebert has been quoted recently as being
skeptical of the plan.
?????"Some people in Washington see this as more of an ideological
statement," Davis said. "As a governor, I see it as a practical solution. . .
. Clearly, we have to persuade lots of people in Washington that what we're
doing is the right thing."
?????Davis expressed optimism that the Bush administration would approve the
transfer. Davis and other governors attending the conference met with the
president for about 45 minutes at the White House on Monday.
?????In his opening remarks, Bush repeated his desire to give the states more
authority, saying "real change comes from the states up."
?????Davis noted that he and other Western governors are hoping for federal
aid to overhaul the transmission and distribution systems for electricity and
natural gas system.
?????"If we're going to have a strong economy," Davis said, "we have to have
the electricity to power it."
?????Davis, chairman of the Democratic Governors Assn., was scheduled to
attend a $5.5-million fund-raiser Monday night for the Democratic governors
in Washington. He will then leave for New York, where he will hold personal
fund-raisers and confer with Wall Street analysts Wednesday about the state's
energy situation.
?????Meanwhile, Duke Energy North America on Monday suspended a lawsuit it
had filed against Davis. The company said it reached an "interim settlement"
to sell power to the state at the same below-market prices that it originally
had agreed to supply to Edison and PG&E under long-term contracts.
?????Duke sued the governor after he used emergency authority to seize the
Duke contracts and similar contracts signed by other energy companies with
the two utilities. Davis' action prevented the Power Exchange, the state's
now defunct electricity market, from liquidating the contracts after Edison
and PG&E defaulted on multimillion-dollar payments.
?????The agreement reached Monday between Duke and the state expires April
30, a Duke spokesman said, which should give the parties enough time to reach
a more formal settlement.
?????Power Exchange officials, however, are pressing ahead with their
$1-billion claim against the state. Under California law, the state must pay
reasonable value for private property seized under the governor's emergency
authority.
* * *
?????Morain reported from Washington, Rivera Brooks from Los Angeles. Times
staff writers Tim Reiterman in San Francisco and Nancy Vogel in Sacramento
contributed to this story. Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

?
??
?


we maybe slow, but we eventually get there,,

as you know Carr has been trying to get approval from within and from Enron
finance people to create margin financing to execute & clear Nymex (and
e-nymex too) business for Enron. Well we are finally there..
We would love the opportunity to renew our realtionship of executing and/or
clearing for you again.
We are told (by Sarah) that you would have to talk to your individual
finance person to get the particulars of this, but she told us that we are
basically approved.. If you have any question about this , please call..
Other than that any assistance we could be to help in this , let us know..
definitely looking forward to this opportunity to do business again.

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-2205
Fax:  312-368-2281
mheffner@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Please refer to agenda below for today's conference call.  A spreadsheet has
been attached detailing
assets that are currently under review, along with persons responsible for
assisting in this review
process.

The Regulatory Risk Assessment Working Group Agenda:

1.     Brief recap of meetings held in Canada and England

     - Review the trends discovered from the first phase of risk assessment,
primarily the lack of a standardized due diligence process for Enron's
businesses

2.     Focus on development of formal due diligence procedures for various
business segments - i.e. Generation, Distribution, possibly transmission and
retail

     - Formation of  teams to tackle each of the segments separately

3.     Wrap up the second phase of regulatory risk assessment

Conference Room EB-4741 has been  reserved for this call.


I think it looks fine; will defer to Jeff's edits.

	Jeannie Mandelker@ECT
	09/21/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Yvette
Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mark Frevert's column for ENA's Exchange Magazine

Steve, this is the column I mentioned to you Monday. We do a column under
Mark's name for ENA's customer magazine, Exchange. This month's topic is
California. I'd like you to read it and see if we are getting the message
right. Jeff, please let me know if there are errors.

Once we get your comments, we'll show it to Mark.

Thanks,
Jeannie


Hi folks:
Well, I ended up traveling ALL week, which I wasn't happy about.  Worse, some
nimrod Enron IT person in Houston (where I was for part of the time) deleted
my entire *&$*(!*-ing hard disk (which stupidly, I hadn't backed up)---year's
worth of work and school gone, kaputt.  Anyway, if there's any chance that
someone has all of the cases that we did and could email them to me, I would
be greatly indebted.  Sorry for the inconvenience, and see you on Monday.

Best,
Jeff


BammelYoungFamilies

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Cammy Guggis [mailto:CGuggis@alvin.cc.tx.us]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:59 AM
To: Janet Berry; GFWA@chevron.com; 5moore@family.net; acoc@iwl.net;
mscraig@ix.netcom.com; ldouglas@rendamarine.com;
nnherrin@simba.nat.k12.la.us
Subject: Fwd: Thought this was important

 Subject: Please read, sign, and pass on.

THOUGH SHE'S DEAD AND HAS JUST BEEN LOCATED, AFTER 5 YEARS, THIS LADY
CONTINUES TO HAUNT US FROM HER SHALLOW GRAVE.
GET THIS:

CBS will be forced to discontinue "Touched by an Angel" for using the word
God in every program. Madeline Murray O'Hare, an atheist, successfully
managed to eliminate the use of Bible reading from public schools a few
years ago. Now her organization has been granted a  Federal Hearing on the
same subject by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Washington,
DC. Their petition, Number 2493,  would ultimately pave the way to stop the
reading of the gospel our Lord and Savior, and the airwaves of America.

They got 287,000 signatures to back their stand! If this attempt is
successful, all Sunday worship services being broadcast on the radio or by
television will be stopped. This group is also campaigning to remove all
Christmas programs and Christmas carols from public schools!! You as a
Christian can help!

We are praying for at least 1 million signatures. This would defeat their
effort and how that there are many Christians alive, well and concerned
about our country. As christians we must unite on this.

Please don't take this lightly. We ignored this lady once and lost prayer in
our school and in offices across the nation.

Please stand up for your religious freedom and let your voice be heard.
Together we
can make a  difference in our country while creating an opportunity
for the lost to know the Lord.

Please press "forward", CLEAN UP THE MESSAGE, and forward this to everyone
that you think should read this.

Now, please sign your name at the bottom (you can only add your name after
you have pressed the "Forward").

Don't delete any other names, just go to the next number and type your name.
Please do not sign jointly, such as Mr. & Mrs. Each person should sign
his/her own name.

Please e-mail this to everyone that you think needs to read this, and help
us defeat this organization and keep the right of our freedom of religion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When you get to 1000 please e mail back to
> > > > > > > Lisa Norman at electric_yello@hotmail.com.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1: Courtney S. - Please people sign this letter!!
> > > > > > > 2: Shelbi W.
> > > > > > > 3: Brittany S.
> > > > > > > 4: Lora J.
> > > > > > > 5: Kim S.
> > > > > > > 6: Adam P.
> > > > > > > 7: Jana C.
> > > > > > > 8: Terry Williams - Deer Park, TX
> > > > > > > 9: Megan C.
> > > > > > > 10: Christy C.
> > > > > > > 11: Andy Crais
> > > > > > > 12: Mollie Rice - Knoxville, TN
> > > > > > > 13: Forrest S. - Lexington, KY
> > > > > > > 14: Cherie F. - Lexington, KY
> > > > > > > 15: Gerald Goodlett II - Lexington, KY
> > > > > > > 16: Amanda Ferguson
> > > > > > > 17: Valerie Grimes - Lexington, KY
> > > > > > > 18: Erin McKenzie - Lexington, KY
> > > > > > > 19: Robert Harrison - Cincinnati Ohio
> > > > > > > 20: Barbara Cronk - Clearwater, FL
> > > > > > > 21: Linda Tilley - Bemidji, Minnesota
> > > > > > > 22: Donald Huntington - Irvine, CA
> > > > > > > 23: Mary Stimpson - Shoreview, MN
> > > > > > > 24: Kevin Gegner - Redwood Falls, MN.
> > > > > > > 25: Marie Alexander - Canada
> > > > > > > 26: Wes Erhart - Canada
> > > > > > > 27. Wendy Barbour - Canada
> > > > > > > 28. Craig H.
> > > > > > > 29. Kathy H.
> > > > > > > 30. Joan Guthrie - Canada
> > > > > > > 31. Ron Guthrie
> > > > > > > 32. Benita S.- Canada
> > > > > > > 33: Hanny Kensington - Canada
> > > > > > > 34. B. Brown - Canada
> > > > > > > 35. Bill Olsen
> > > > > > > 36. Gaydene Olsen
> > > > > > > 37. Jennifer Visser
> > > > > > > 38. Josh Olsen
> > > > > > > 39. Donna Petch
> > > > > > > 40. Andre Lefebvre - Canada
> > > > > > > 41. John Hetherington - Canada
> > > > > > > 42. Gaetanne Hetherington - Canada
> > > > > > > 43. Shanie Melanson - Canada
> > > > > > > 44. Peter Hill - Canada
> > > > > > > 45. Janet Hill - Canada
> > > > > > > 47. Emma Hill - Canada
> > > > > > > 48. Michael Donley - Canada
> > > > > > > 49. Geogia Gililand -Canada
> > > > > > > 50. Kevin Wilnechenko - Canada
> > > > > > > 51. Ruth Enns
> > > > > > > 52. Allison Kern - Canada
> > > > > > > 53. Anika deRaad - Canada
> > > > > > > 54. Erik Uunila - Canada
> > > > > > > 55. Krista Uunila - Canada
> > > > > > > 56. Leila Uunila - Canada
> > > > > > > 57. Rose Uunila - Canada
> > > > > > > 58. Marilyn Forbes - Canada
> > > > > > > 59. Colin Evans -Canada
> > > > > > > 60. Angela C.-Canada
> > > > > > > 61. Kimberly Mager -Canada
> > > > > > > 62. Kathryn Ferrari - Canada
> > > > > > > 63. Janna Smith -Canada
> > > > > > > 64. Shanna Ridley- Canada
> > > > > > > 65. Thomas Somerville-Canada
> > > > > > > 66. Lisa Norman-Canada
> > > > > > > 67. Pat Wright-Canada
> > > > > > > >68. John Wright- Canada
> > > > > > > 69. Stuart Hemmings
> > > > > > > 70. Sandra Hemmings
> > > > > > > 71. Robert Badham
> > > > > > > 72. June Badham
> > > > > > > 73. Vance Taylor
> > > > > > > 74. Pamela Schwab-Canada
> > > > > > > 75. Ernest Schwab - Canada
> > > > > > > 76. Carlene Neeve- Canada
> > > > > > > 77. Gloria Stewart
> > > > > > > 78. Harold Stewart
> > > > > > > 79. Jackie Cannon, Princeton, KY
> > > > > > > 80. Bro. Gerald Cannon, Princeton, KY
> > > > > > > 81. Kim Brown
> > > > > > > 82. Barry Brown
> > > > > > > 83. Ken Scott
> > > > > > > 84. Debby Scott
> > > > > > > 85. Haley Scott
> > > > > > > 86. Ryanne Scott
> > > > > > > 87. Laura Clark, Crofton, KY
> > > > > > > 88. Kendal Clark, Crofton, KY
> > > > > > > 89. Sherry Kaye Newton, Hopkinsville, KY
> > > > > > > 90. Jeff Newton, Hopkinsville, KY
> > > > > > > 91. Matthew Newton, Hopkinsville, KY
> > > > > > > 92. Caleb Newton, Hopkinsville, KY
> > > > > > > 93. Joshua Newton, Hopkinsville, KY
> > > > > > > 94. Lisa Francis , Crofton, Ky
> > > > > > > 95. Butch Francis, Crofton, Ky
> > > > > > > 96. Ivy Francis, Crofotn, Ky
> > > > > > > 97. Selena Chamberlin, Az
> > > > > > > 98. Rose M. Chamberlin
> > > > > > > 99. Gabriel Pullen Tucson, Arizona
> > > > > > > 100. Steven Bell Tucson, Arizona
> > > > > > > 101. Gracie Graves Edmond, Oklahoma
> > > > > > > 102. Celeste Graves Provo, Utah
> > > > > > > 103. Deric Weiss Pleasant Grove, Utah
> > > > > > > 104. Erika Hernandez Orem, Utah
> > > > > > > 105. Daren Reavis Provo, Utah
> > > > > > > 106. Christina Baker, Auburn, Washington
> > > > > > > 107. Mary Christine Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 108. Elna Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 109. Gary Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 110. Britain Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 111. Julia Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 112. Jill Baker, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 113. Carl D. Hill Sumner, Wa
> > > > > > > 114. Helen P. Hill-Sumner, WA
> > > > > > > 115. Cecil G. Jepson, Mtlk Terr., WA
> > > > > > > 116. Betty R. Jepson, Mtlk Terr., WA
> > > > > > > 117. Penny Jepson
> > > > > > > 118. LeAnn Riegel, Univ. Place, WA
> > > > > > > 119. Heather E. Ehli, Puyallup, WA
> > > > > > > 120. Heather L. Conatser, Puyallup, WA
> > > > > > > 121. Sarah L. Sturzen, Graham, WA
> > > > > > > 122. Briana B. Holmes Tacoma, wa
> > > > > > > 123. Ashley nelson puyallup, WA
> > > > > > > 124. Crissy Bray, Sumner, WA
> > > > > > > 125. Andrew Brady, Sumner WA
> > > > > > > 126. Elizabeth Alarcon, Glendale, AZ
> > > > > > > 127. Gloria Records Tucson, AZ
> > > > > > > 128. Stephen Records Tucson, AZ
> > > > > > > 129. Dr. Edward L. Kemper, Sacramento, CA
> > > > > > > 130. Ronald Dyck Sacramento, CA
> > > > > > > 131. Cathy Dyck Sacramento, CA
> > > > > > > 132. Chrissy Kay Oregon
> > > > > > > 133. Rhonda Weaver, OR
> > > > > > > 134. Terry Weaver, OR
> > > > > > > 135. Dave Shank, OR
> > > > > > > 136. Carol Shank, OR
> > > > > > > 137. Ben Shank, OR
> > > > > > > 138. Tim Shank, OR
> > > > > > > 139. Vonda Bitikofer, OR
> > > > > > > 140. Marty Chipman, WA
> > > > > > > 141. Joan Chipman, WA
> > > > > > > 142. Ray Chipmanm, WA
> > > > > > > 143. Beverly Wenge, WA.
> > > > > > > 144. Donald Wenge, WA.
> > > > > > > 145. Vicki Graf, CA
> > > > > > > 146. Corrine Bonsey, WA
> > > > > > > 147. Ric Bonsey, WA
> > > > > > > 148. Dawn Garruto, WA
> > > > > > > 149. Chris Garruto, WA
> > > > > > > 150. Sandy Barnes, Florida
> > > > > > > 151. Jay Crutchfield, FL
> > > > > > > 152. Lorie Evans, FL
> > > > > > > 153. Asa L. Evans III, FL
> > > > > > > 154. Ashley Woodard, FL
> > > > > > > 155. Todd Woodard, FL
> > > > > > > 156. Maria Roland, FL
> > > > > > > 157. William Roland, FL
> > > > > > > 158. Jeff Bos, Winter Springs, Florida
> > > > > > > 159. Stacey Bos, Winter Springs, Florida
> > > > > > > 160. Woody Potter, Las Vegas, NV
> > > > > > > 161. D'nee Potter, Las Vegas, NV
> > > > > > > 162. Marshia Popplewell, Denison, Tx.
> > > > > > > 163. Jerry Johnson, Denison, Tx.
> > > > > > > 164. Rosella Elifrits, Sunrise Beach, MO
> > > > > > > 165. Miranda Elifrits, Sunrise Beach, MO
> > > > > > > 166. Pete Elifrits, Sunrise Beach MO
> > > > > > > 167. Gary Elifrits, St. Joseph, MO
> > > > > > > 168. Brenda Elifrits, St. Joseph, MO
> > > > > > > 169. Martha Ann Dwyer, Kansas City, MO
> > > > > > > 170. Edith McHugh, Kansas City, MO
> > > > > > > 171. Pamela Knudson, Kansas City,MO
> > > > > > > 172. Robert Knudson, Kansas City, MO
> > > > > > > 173. Jennifer Cole, Higginsville, MO
> > > > > > > 174. Ryan Cole, Higginsville, MO
> > > > > > > 175. Kim Levy, Blue Springs, MO
> > > > > > > 176. James Levy, Blue Springs, MO
> > > > > > > 177. Debbie Tuter, Lee's Summit MO
> > > > > > > 178. Barb Johnson, Overland Park, KS
> > > > > > > 179. Linda Gray, St. Charles, IA
> > > > > > > 180. Rich Gray, St. Charles, IA
> > > > > > > 181. Brian Gray, St. Charles, IA
> > > > > > > 182. Teri Mash, Waukee, IA
> > > > > > > 183. Thomas Mash, Waukee, IA
> > > > > > > 184. Colleen McClaflin, Des Moines, IA
> > > > > > > 185. James McClaflin, Des Moines,IA
> > > > > > > 186. Kim Sanford, Des Moines, IA
> > > > > > > 187. Peg Herman, Truro, IA
> > > > > > > 188. Jim Herman, Truro, IA
> > > > > > > 189. Don Brichacek, Truro, Ia.
> > > > > > > 190. Phyllis Brichacek, Truro, Ia.
> > > > > > > 200. DEEDEE BUCHANAN 'TRURO' IA
> > > > > > > 201. Tonia Rouse, Blue Hill NE
> > > > > > > 202. Nancy B. Johnson, Havelock, IA
> > > > > > > 203. Gennifer L. Scott, Emmetsburg, IA
> > > > > > > 204. Michael J. Scott, Emmetsburg, IA.
> > > > > > > 205. Rick Nielsen, Emmetsburg, IA
> > > > > > > 206. Rachel Krull, Emmetsburg, IA
> > > > > > > 207. Allison Reneau, Sioux Fall, SD
> > > > > > > 208. Tom Reneau, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 209. Kim Brusati, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 210. Derrick Hilbrands, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 211. April Sadler, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 212. Doug Sadler, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 213. Alvina Borchers, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 214. Henrietta Kay Myers, Sioux Falls, SD
> > > > > > > 215. Sharon Baer Middlebury, IN
> > > > > > > 216. Ed Baer Middlebury, IN
> > > > > > > 217 Ted Wrench Coventryville, NY
> > > > > > > 218. Brenda Wrench Coventryville NY
> > > > > > > 219. Jevene Davis, Forest, VA
> > > > > > > 220. Lee Baer, Virginia Beach, VA
> > > > > > > 221. Filomena Baer, Virginia Beach, VA
> > > > > > > 222. Vaughan Davis, Forest, VA
> > > > > > > 223. Angela R., Gretna, VA
> > > > > > > 224. Steven R., Gretna, VA
> > > > > > > 225. Ian R., Gretna, VA
> > > > > > > 226. Diane W. Wallace, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 227. Gary R. Wallace, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 228. Ann Thiani, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 229. Joseph Thiani, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 230. Sarah Thiani, Cary, NC
> > > > > > > 231. Coit Ray, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 232. Helen Ray, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 233. Renee Martin, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 234. Douglas Martin, Raleigh, NC
> > > > > > > 235. David Martin, R
> > > > > > > 236. Gracie S.Senter
> > > > > > > 237. Guy H. Senter
> > > > > > > 238. Thomas C. Senter
> > > > > > > 239. Patti Armiger
> > > > > > > 240. Janet Armiger
> > > > > > > 241. Guy Armiger
> > > > > > > 242. Paul F. Clarkston, WA
> > > > > > > 243. Guylene F. Clarkston, WA
> > > > > > > 244. Connie L. Ayers, Alabama
> > > > > > > 245. Missy Harris, AL
> > > > > > > 246. Dan Davis, Al
> > > > > > > 247. Carol Davis, Al
> > > > > > > 248. D. Lee Davis, A
> > > > > > > 249. W. Parker, MS
> > > > > > > 250. S. Warwick, MS
> > > > > > > 251. Sandra Brown, FL
> > > > > > > 252. Michael Allen
> > > > > > > 253. Carl Brown Jackson MS
> > > >   254. Marilynn Jackson, MS
> > > >   255. Mary Davis Jackson, MS
> > > >   256. Sarah May - Monticello, MS
> > > >   257. Charles Belton - Monticel
> > > >   258. Kay Jolly - MS
> > > >   259. Carrie Greene - MS
> > > >   260. Sandi Benjamin - MS
> > > >   261. Emily McCarty- MS
> > > >   262. Dave Lund, KS
> > > >   263. Cindy Tuley, KS
> > > >   264. Charlie Tuley, KS
> > > >   265. Jamie Tuley, KS
> > > >   266. Shannon Lund, KS
> > > >   267. Brandi Wegner,, KS
> > > >   268. Jeannie Jones, Ks
> > > >   269. Judy Truelove, KS
> > > >   270. Sara Truelove, VA
> > > >   271. Lynn Miller, NC
> > > >   272. Carolyn Barkocy
> > > >   273. Joe Barkocy
> > > >   274. Susan Reynolds Barkocy, Clemmons NC
> > > >   275. James Dayton Sisson, Millington, TN
> > > >   276. Robert W Payton, Mocksville, NC
> > > >   277. Charles Farmer, Siloam Springs, AR
> > > >   278. Tiffany Harrod, Plano, TX
> > > >   279. Karen Ray, Plano, TX
> > > >   280. Julie Mack, Frisco, TX
> > > >   281. Donna Brower, Lewisville, TX
> > > >   282. Mary Edwards, Emory, Tx.
> > > > 283. Allen Edwards, Emory, Tx.
> > > >   284. Sharen Edwards, Garland, TX
> > > >   285. Gary Edwards, Garland, TX
> > > >   286. G Turner, Kilgore, TX
> > > >   287.  M Turner, Kilgore, Texas
> > > >   288.  Staci Holcomb, Longview, Texas
> > > >   289.  Destry Holcomb, Diana Texas
> > > >   290.  Christy Holcomb, Diana Texas
> > > >   291.  Riley Holcomb, Diana Texas
> > > >   292.  Haley Holcomb, Diana Texas
> > > >   293.  Morgan Holcomb, Longview Texas
> > > >   294.  Ronnie Harber, Longview, Texas
> > > >   295.  Anthony Harber, Longview, Texas
> > > >  296.  Peggy Brandon, Longview, Texas
> > > >  297. Emmett Capt, Kilgore, Texas
> > 298. David L. Hinson,
>        299   Don Lee          Bossier City , La.
>  300  JOHN WEAVER HOUSTON , TEXAS
> 301  KAREN WEAVER HOUSTON , TEXAS?> >>>302  Elizabeth Beasley,  Houston, Texas?>        303  Mary Beth Breakey, Houston, Texas?>        304 Kathy Greenwood?>        305 Dan Greenwood?       306 Teresa Cooke, Pasadena, Tx?       307 Rod Cooke, Pasadena, Tx?       308 Cammy Guggisberg, Alvin, TX?       309 Mike Guggisberg,  Alvin, TX???______________________________________________________________________?To unsubscribe, write to BammelYoungFamilies-unsubscribe@listbot.com


Here is follow-up research on the question of whether we could remove a
criminal case against Enron to federal court.  It is not as promising as we
first thought.

Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Amanda D.
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:59 PM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Cc: Molland, Michael E.; Meringolo, Peter
> Subject: Enron: Response to Criminal Charges
>
> Gary,
>
> Our earlier preliminary research reflected the fact that, although it will
> likely be difficult, it may be possible under the primary jurisdiction
> doctrine to refer criminal charges to FERC, given the criminal penalty
> provisions of the Federal Power Act.  However, as it becomes more clear
> that, if criminal charges are to be filed, they will be filed in
> California, it is necessary to revisit and expand this earlier research.
>
> We noted earlier that there is a body of substantive law dealing generally
> with the question of whether criminal proceedings are subject to the
> primary jurisdiction doctrine, but no case which considered this question
> with respect to the Federal Power Act specifically.  Based on this, we
> concluded that it may be possible, if difficult, to argue that criminal
> charges should be referred to FERC under the primary jurisdiction
> doctrine.  An expansion of this research reveals that this potential for
> referral appears to only be applicable to federal criminal charges.
>
> State criminal charges are not removable under 28 U.S.C. Section 1441,
> which provides that:  "[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided by Act of
> Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district
> courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by
> the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United
> States for the district and division embracing the place where such action
> is pending."  Moreover, our research has revealed no case in which state
> criminal charges were referred directly to any federal regulatory agency.
>
>
> However, our research has revealed another alternative to removal or
> referral of criminal charges.  See generally Sprint Corp. v. Evans (M.D.
> Al. 1993) 818 F.Supp. 1447; Sprint Corp. v. Evans (M.D. Al. 1994) 846
> F.Supp. 1497.
>
> In 1993, the Attorney General of Alabama began an investigation of Sprint
> Corporation, an international telecommunications company acting as a
> "common carrier" within the meaning of the federal Communications Act.
> Sprint, among other things, provided a "1-800" service to subscribers
> pursuant to tariffs filed with the FCC.   To use these "1-800" numbers, a
> caller places a call through a local telephone company, who connects the
> call to a long distance carrier such as Sprint, who generally then
> connected the call to the "1-800" subscribers local telephone number.
>
> In February 1993, Sprint received a subpoena from the Montgomery County
> Grand Jury commanding it to appear and produce all records relating to the
> "1-800" service.  Sprint produced the documents and learned that it was
> under investigation for violation of Alabama's obscenity laws in
> connection with allegedly obscene content distributed over telephone
> lines.
>
> In March 1993, Sprint filed a motion for a temporary restraining order
> (TRO) and a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the Alabama Attorney
> General from pursuing a criminal indictment against Sprint for violation
> of the obscenity law.  Sprint maintained enforcement of the anti-obscenity
> law would interfere with federal statutory rights because regulation of
> interstate communications is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the FCC.
> At the TRO hearing the Attorney General could not testify that the
> prosecution was not imminent and, therefore, the court issued the TRO.
>
> Later in March, the Court decided Sprint's motion for a preliminary
> injunction.  Sprint Corp. v. Evans (M.D. Al. 1993) 818 F.Supp. 1447.  At
> the hearing on this motion, counsel for the Attorney General stated that
> the Attorney General's position regarding Sprint's criminal liability
> under the obscenity statute related to the its obligations under that law
> when a telephone customer complains that a "1-800" subscriber's message is
> offensive.  According to counsel, if a customer complains, Sprint is
> obligated to either report the complaint to a prosecuting attorney or
> begin a declaratory judgment action against the subscriber.
>
> The District Court granted the preliminary injunction.  The court held
> that, under the relevant Eleventh Circuit test for determining whether a
> preliminary injunction should issue, the movant must show:  "(1) a
> substantial likelihood that she will ultimately prevail on the merits;
> (2) that she will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction issues;
> (3) that the threatened injury to the movant outweighs whatever damage the
> proposed injunction may cause the opposing party;  and (4) that if issued,
> the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest."   Sprint, 818
> F.Supp. at 1452.
>
> Before the Court considered the first element of this test, the Court
> addressed the contention that the District Court had no jurisdiction.  The
> Court held that: "[t]he Supreme Court, however, has held that federal
> courts have federal-question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. S 1331 to
> entertain suits to enjoin state officials from interfering with federal
> statutory rights."
>
> The Court then held that there was a substantial likelihood that Sprint
> would prevail on the merits because "to the extent that the Alabama
> anti-obscenity statute attempts to impose reporting requirements on
> communications by common carriers, it is interstate in nature and
> preempted by federal law.... The statute is being used as a mechanism to
> impose new reporting requirements on common carriers with regard to their
> 800 service.   Currently, under federal law, common carriers do not have
> an affirmative obligation to investigate whether their facilities are
> being used by customers for a lawful purpose."  (Importantly, the Court
> did not reach the question whether the Communications Act preempts all
> Alabama laws imposing liability for conduct of common carriers in the area
> of obscenity.  The Court also rejected the Attorney General's argument
> that a Younger abstention was necessary.)
>
> The Court disposed of the last three parts of the preliminary injunction
> test easily.  First, the Court held that irreparable harm would result
> because "an indictment against Sprint would cause great harm to its
> business reputation and would jeopardize its status as a government
> contractor."  Second, the Court held that the potential harm to Sprint
> outweighed the potential harm to the Attorney General because "although
> the Attorney General relies on a state statute directed at the prosecution
> of the distribution of obscene matter, the Attorney General really seeks
> to impose interstate reporting requirements on common carriers--in other
> words, the generic proceeding at issue is the regulation of interstate
> telecommunications by common carriers outside the context of the
> distribution of obscene matter.  The Attorney General clearly has no
> interest in such interstate regulation."  Third, the Court held that the
> "preliminary injunction serves the public interest by ensuring that the
> national interest in fulfilling the goals of the Federal Communications
> Act."  Sprint, 818 F.Supp. at 1460-61.
>
> In a separate decision, almost a year later, the District Court granted,
> in part, Sprint's motion to refer certain issues to the FCC under the
> doctrine of primary jurisdiction.  Sprint 2, 846 F.Supp. at 1501.  Prior
> to this motion, the Alabama Attorney General changed its allegations
> regarding the illegality of Sprint's conduct under the obscenity law --
> now alleging that Sprint was not criminally liable because of a failure to
> report, but because of a aiding and abetting theory.
>
> The District Court held, in brief, that  "(1) referral to FCC under
> primary jurisdiction doctrine was warranted with regard to question of
> whether common carriers, consistent with Communications Act, may refuse to
> carry information provider's program transmitted as "1-800" service if
> program contains sexually explicit information that has not been
> adjudicated obscene, and (2) referral to FCC was not warranted with
> respect to question of whether attempted criminal prosecution of
> interstate common carrier under state's antiobscenity laws for knowingly
> transmitting potentially obscene or obscene telephone communications
> through its interstate "1-800" facilities is preempted by Communications
> Act."  Sprint 2, 846 F.Supp. at 1497.  The Court then ordered that the
> record of the case be transmitted to the FCC, that the preliminary
> injunction remain in effect and that all motions would be denied without
> prejudice until after the FCC rendered its decision.
>
> Obviously, no analysis of the criminal charges against Enron can yet be
> made, but there is a significant chance that Enron may be able to cast any
> criminal charges filed by the California Attorney General as "regulatory"
> in nature.  Moreover, given relative lack of effect the Alabama Attorney
> General's change in position in the middle of the Sprint case, the
> "regulatory" aspect of the charges may not be as important as it may seem
> in the first Sprint holding on the preliminary injunction.
>
> Please let me know if you would like me to pursue this further.  My
> research has not yet revealed any case that is factually similar to the
> Sprint case.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


NO.  CALP is a wholesale contract.

Brenda H Fletcher
04/11/2000 09:09 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CGAS contract 64231

Chris,
Do you invoice CES Retail for the monthly and volumetric demand paid by ENA
to CALP?

Chris Germany
04/10/2000 06:09 PM
To: Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CGAS contract 64231

This is a good time to bring this up.  Unless the original CES agreement has
changed, ENA will pay CALP a monthly demand charge of $103,417 from 1/1/2000
- 4/30/2000.  From 6/1/2000 - 7/7/2000, ENA will pay a (volumetric) demand
charge of $.02/mmbtu to CALP for any volumes utilized by ENA.

Which brings up 2 important points;
 1.The month of May has not been addressed which means Robin needs to discuss
this with CALP (and she may have already)
     However, currently we will not be showing any demand estimates for May.

 2.  It's a new ball game starting 7/8/2000.

Comments/questions?

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 05:57
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
04/10/2000 04:37 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CGAS contract 64231

This contract is on the ECT April spreadsheet under CES Wholesale.  What is
the relationship between ENA and Commonwealth Atlantic?
(Who pays transport invoice?  Any reimbursements?)

Thanks,
Brenda


good point

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:16 PM
To:	Neal, Scott; Grigsby, Mike; Shively, Hunter S.; Arnold, John; Presto, Kevin M.; Martin, Thomas A.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject:	Elevator talk

Please remind everyone to be mindful of elevator talk.  A consultant I know working in the Enron building overheard someone the other day saying talking about positions, price and pnl being lost?

Thanks,
Frank


Late this morning, the House Energy and Commerce Committee adoped the
committee print, as amended, of an energy package that addresses
conservation, clean coal, renewables, hydro, nuclear, and boutique fuels.
The vote was 50 to 5 to report the bill.  Other committees -- Ways and
Means, Science, and Resources -- also moved their energy bills this week.
Thus, the House is on track to consider a merged package before the start
of the August Recess on August 3rd.

As to electricity, during the several days of debate this week both
Chairmen Tauzin and Barton reaffirmed their intention to next move to
electricity issues.  Mr. Barton's staff advised me this morning that the
subcommittee he chairs will hold a hearing on Friday, July 20th on all
electricity issues other than transmission.  While Mr.  Barton has publicly
held out hope of marking up an electricity bill this month, sources on and
off the committee do not see this timetable as realistic.  On the Senate
side, the majority staff is working on an electricity "white paper" that
may be circulated for comment next week.

Below is a recap of action on amendments of interest to Enron:

1.   Last night, on a largely partisan vote (with Democrats Hall, Green and
John voting with the Republicans) the Committee rejected an amendment by
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) (that was to have been offered by Rep. Anna Eshoo
(D-CA)) that would have retroactively amended the FERC refund date and
essentially ordered refunds regardless of amounts owed to power sellers.

2.   First thing this morning the Committee, again on a largely partisan
basis (with Democrats Hall, Green, John and Towns), rejected a Waxman
amendment to impose cost-of-service rates on all power in the West (other
than generation added after 1/1/01).  (Originally, Mr. Waxman was going to
offer amendment to impose cost-of-service rates only on those who do not
supply all available power during an emergency, but he ended up offering
basically what he had pursued in subcommittee on the old "Californa Only"
bill.)

3.   The Committee adopted an amendment by Rep. Shadegg to amend the
Natural Gas Act to make it clear that a natural gas "transportation
facility" shall not be added to the National Register of Historic Places
until FERC has abandoned the facility.  Apparently there have been some
instances of "old" pipelines being considered as "historic places" under
federal law.  The House Resources Committee added a similar amendment to
its package yesterday.

4.   By voice vote, the Committee rejected a Waxman Amendment to require
the president to propose and implement a plan to bring U.S. greenhouse
gases down to 1990 levels.  There was strong opposition voiced by many
Republicans and Democrats to this amendment.

5.   By mixed vote of 24 to 29, the Committee defeated a Waxman Amendment
to set cost and performance goals for renewables, including wind power, and
authorize federal funds to assist with commercial project costs (up to 50
percent).


Robert and Louise:  Reading from the bottom up, here is a string of emails that determined we would let the provisions of the plan and agreement govern Echterhoff's issue.  By the way, some of his assumed facts aren't correct - we don't make exceptions regarding the plans because of bad accounting results.  Retirement for the stock plan is age 55 with 5 years of service regardless of whether you retire from Enron with respect to benefit programs.

If you would like to discuss, give me a call.

Aaron
x39280

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joyce, Mary
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Brown, Aaron (Executive Comp); Cash, Michelle; Oxley, David; fmackin@aol.com
Cc:	Mayes, Fran L.
Subject:	RE: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

We are going to have to let the plan rule , however, I think this points out how important it is to always stipulate that the grant agreement rules.  Either verbally or in writing, we need to say " generally it is the shorter of the term of the option or 3 years.  This depends on when the grant was made."

Mary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Aaron (Executive Comp)
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Oxley, David; fmackin@aol.com
Cc:	Mayes, Fran L.; Joyce, Mary
Subject:	RE: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

I spoke with Pat and he agrees with you Michelle.  He said that the award agreement rules.

Aaron

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:24 PM
To:	Oxley, David; fmackin@aol.com
Cc:	Brown, Aaron (Executive Comp); Mayes, Fran L.; Joyce, Mary
Subject:	RE: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

The Q&A is not binding -- it clearly states that the plan prevails.  Unfortunately, some people have grants that do not have the 3-year period to exercise, although I understand that most of the more recent grants do have the 3-year period.

Pat, let me know if you disagree.

Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate 05/31/2001 12:18 PM 	   To: Aaron Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Fran L Mayes/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Mary Joyce/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

OK. So what do we say to these people "plan prevails, Q&A may have been misleading, but tough"?

If Mich tells me that Q&A is not legally binding on us I am fine with above. Since they are leaving us I have no desire to give them more than the plan entitles them to, but I am frustrated that we stated 3 years so clearly in Q&A.

David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Aaron (Executive Comp)
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Mayes, Fran L.; Cash, Michelle; Oxley, David
Cc:	Joyce, Mary
Subject:	RE: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

We don't change the terms of option agreements at Enron because of uncapped earnings charges after changes are made.  Caveat seems fine and the provisions of the plan prevail.

Aaron

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mayes, Fran L.
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Brown, Aaron (Executive Comp); Cash, Michelle
Subject:	FW: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

	FYI.  I have already sent a copy to David Oxley.

	Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Echterhoff, Lal
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Mayes, Fran L.
Cc:	Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Re: STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

Your position that the general disclaimer on the Q&A of March 8 negated the specific response to the question regarding the period to exercise stock options is unacceptable.  If the answer to this specific question, shown below,  was that various plans had various periods for exercise, then that should have been the answer to the question, not an unequivocal statement that the period to exercise is three years.  I, and I am sure many others, made certain critical decisions based on your statement which you now claim to be of no validity.  I would suggest that the remedy to this situation is to allow all stock options to have a period to exercise of three years unless earlier due to the actual expiration date stated on the grant.  I use the term "expiration date" to be the normal expiration date that would occur is options are unexercised and that would apply to anyone continuing employment with Enron.

With regard to the position that the period to exercise is set by the particular stock option plan and cannot be changed, anything can be changed or special provisions made particularly in the course of a transition due to a merger, spin off or sale of a company.  Special provisions were made to exclude HPL employees from the new all employee stock option plan, special provisions were made to provide a 5% payment to HPL employees in lieu of the new stock option plan, special provisions were made to consider HPL employees over the age of 55 and with more that 5 years of service as retirees to allow vesting of stock options and I feel sure that there have been other special considerations to certain employees.

Lal Echterhoff

From March 8,2001, Q&A:
"1.	With the transfer to AEP, will my termination be listed as involuntary so that I can exercise my vested options?
Yes, your transfer to AEP will be treated as an involuntary termination by reason of divestiture from Enron.
 2.	What is the time frame to exercise my vested stock options?
 The period to exercise vested options upon involuntary termination, retirement, death or disability is three (3) years."
.

From:	Fran L Mayes/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 02:14 PM

Subject:	STOCK OPTION QUESTIONS

	We have received questions from many employees concerning the expiration date for stock options.  The Q&A dated March 8, 2001 stated three years as the 	exercise date for options.  However,  on page 1 of the document, a statement was included regarding the intent of the document and that the stock
	option plan document will govern all provisions of the stock option program.

	If you have options listed on the stock option termination report which list a one year expiration, not three years as stated in question # 16 of the document, this is 	correct and follows the provision of the plan document.  Some employees have options granted under a DIFFERENT stock option plan and that plan carries
	a three year term of expiration.  Please review your report carefully to determine which plan your options were issued under.

	Additionally, the document was intended to provide general information only.  Page 1 included the statement regarding the plan document specifically in case
 	there were any errors made in the document.  Additionally, we stated that employees could obtain copies of the plan document for their review.  Enron provides
	the plan documents so that employees can familiarize themselves with the plan and make decisions based on plan document.

	I apologize for any confusion this may have caused, however, the plan under which the options were granted is the official document by which Enron determines
	the termination date.  Please call me if you need to discuss your options, however, understand that I cannot speak with you regarding other employees' 	compensation/options.


Jerry,

This is the cost of energy variance between actual and projected GWh for the
site using the site specific energy pricing.  For more information where the
pricing came from you can contact Hollis.

Jeff Duff

Jerry Holt
06/03/2002 09:42 AM
To: Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Monthly Operational Report - cost

What does the Variance Cost represent on the Monlthly Operational Report?


Can you have Mike Swerzbin check this with Amerex.

Thanks!

deal 524310
Per Amerex the term should be March not April - term should be April


I have forwarded these to Greg Mausser.  He is the new OA person for west and
denver.  Please send west to him.  Keep sending Texas to me for the time
being.  Thanks.
PL


FYI - Shari Stack is negotiating the brokerage agreement with Banc One and
there seems to be an issue over the interest rate.  Needless to say, I have
never had any conversations with Banc One over this issue.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/25/2000
06:55 PM ---------------------------

Shari Stack
02/25/2000 06:52 PM
To: "James Naughton" <James_Naughton@em.fcnbd.com> @ ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interest Rate Issue

Just to let you know that I checked with Sara Shackleton and she said that no
interest rate has been agreed in her documents. In fact I was just copied on
some documents sent to her by Ken Fatur. I think they have been going back &
forth for some time over whose form to use.

Anyway, Sara is out of town on business all of next week. Even when she gets
back - I do not know when this doc. will get finalized.

If you would like to have the Brokerage Agreement signed in the near future,
I would suggest we agree to the Fed Funds O'night Rate in the Brokerage
Document and then replicate that in the document you (or Ken) will negotiate
with Sara to avoid the mismatch problem you mentioned on the phone.  My
Credit Dep't was not too keen to use the "Call Money Rate". In most if not
all of our Brokerage Agreements - we use the Fed Funds O'night Rate.

If that is OK - pls let me know and I will arrange for the doc's to be
executed.

Kind regards,

Shari


This is a Real Time deal, and that desk enters deals a bit differently than I
do. When they initially do a deal, they enter it for a certain hour or set of
hours. Then, if they agree with a counterparty to extend the deal to flow
through more hours, they change the deal in Scheduling, not EnPower. The way
to see the true volume of a Short Term West Hourly deal is to look in the
"View Actuals" tab. If you look at this deal, you'll see that they extended
the initial 5 MW at HE 11 to look like this:

HE 11 - 5 MW
HE 12 - 5 MW
HE 13 - 5 MW
HE 14 - 4 MW
HE 15 - 4 MW
HE 16 - 4 MW
HE 17 - 5 MW
+__________
 32 MW

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486

Judy Dyer@EES
04/16/2001 10:48 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 570892.1

Can you please let me know if there are other deals that go with the deal #
referenced above?  We have a total of 32 MW but this is only for 5.

Thanks
Judy


the curve adjustment is 0.13
the mid to offer spread is 0.035

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Russell
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	FW: Prepay- New Volumes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Russell
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 12:43 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Cc:	Boyt, Eric
Subject:	FW: Prepay- New Volumes

Dutch,

Can I get a re-quote on the attached volumes.  The numbers below represent your quotes on the curve adjustment and mid-offer spread from last week.

Thanks
Russell

 << File: Volumes by month.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:56 PM
To:	Diamond, Russell
Subject:	RE: Prepay- New Volumes

the curve adjustment is 0.095
the mid to offer spread is 0.035

dq

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Russell
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:47 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Prepay- New Volumes

Thanks Dutch,

 << File: Volumes by month.xls >>


I'd like to at least mention the option today.
Rob

Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com


thanks.  these updates are great.  Jeff

Robert Johnston
10/27/2000 04:40 PM
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Darren Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, William Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trena
McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jacobellis/NA/Enron@Enron, Shane Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Aaron
Armstrong/LON/ECT@ECT, Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, Jurgen Hess/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Japan

Latest overview from our regular Tokyo source...

RJ

1. Mori,s (eventual) resignation shouldn,t have much impact on the Japanese
economy or
yen-dollar beyond a brief knee-jerk reaction. Regardless of the new
government,
it seems clear Miyazawa and his surrogates will continue to control economic
policy
and the figurehead nominally in charge of things doesn,t really matter.

2. The bottom line is the Japanese are itching for another joint intervention.
The weak euro is hurting Japanese export sales in the euro zone and beyond
and they would like to draw a line in the sand near 85 euros to the dollar
and 92 yen to the euro. Problem is, the United States ) in the person of
Larry Summers ) wants intervention used only as a tool of last resort, and
only when central banks can use the element of surprise to spook market
players into euro buying and maximize the bang for their buck.

3. Will the Bank of Japan participate in another round of massive euro buying?
Yes, but only when the U.S. participates in full measure. At what level will
that multilateral intervention next occur? Very difficult to say. If the
Japanese and some in Europe had their druthers they would have been in there
this week. Most analysts say the market has drawn a line in the sand at 80
euros to the dollar and if the central banks let the euro sink below that
level they,ll have a devil of a time getting it back up.

Our judgement is that they have to act above 80. To try to narrow our
prediction beyond that would, I think, be foolhardy.

4. As to yen-dollar, we see some further yen weakness ahead for several
reasons.
The wave of bankruptcies  in Japan shows no sign of abating. And they,re
getting bigger, with Kyoei Life,s demise the largest yet (4.5 trillion yen).
While big bankruptcies are inevitable and some see a silver lining because
Japan is finally trimming the dead wood from its economy, the effect on
market sentiment has been grim. The Nikkei remains lost in a dark, dark wood
for that reason, and in sympathy with the NASDAQ.

Oil prices and the events in the middle east are also dollar positive on
balance, because of the flight to quality and the fact that much of the
world,s oil is denominated in dollars. And the Japanese first half reporting
season ended Sept. 30, taking away a big incentive for exporters to
repatriate dollars.

So we see a somewhat weaker range for the yen over the near term ) let,s
call it 108-112, with a bias towards the bottom of that range. There,s some
heavy resistance to the dollar  around 111.73, this year,s peak. So while the
dollar might poke through 110 some time soon, the bulk of trading should be
in the 108-109 range.

Longer term, rising profits on the export and high-tech sectors and continued
strong capital investment will pull the economy slowly out of the woods. And
we continue to look for a stronger yen next year.

5. On BOJ policy, don,t look for another rate increase any time soon. The BOJ
took a lot of flack for the timing of its August increase and they made their
political point about independence. Our outlook is for an even keel on
monetary policy near term. No change at least through the end of this year.

6. Technology notes: Japanese semiconductor makers are set to announce strong
earnings growth in the year ended Sept. 30. NEC, Toshiba, Fujitsu, Hitachi
and Mitsubishi Electric chip divisions will all report operating profits up
between 20 percent and 60 percent. (

And you may have seen where four Japanese companies ) Matsushita Electric,
Toshiba, Sony and Hitachi are entering into another venture to create
interactive broadcasting and storage datacasting ) eventually producing
advanced TV set- top boxes (STBs). These are the next generation boxes that
turn TVs into computers, enable Internet access via TVs, enable users to
access and store music, videos and games and conduct e-commerce transactions,
remote in hand, from their easychairs.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 10:07
AM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           03/13/2000 09:51 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES needs for March

I have no contacts to buy from.  Mountaineer production is normally sold on
term deals.

Chris Germany@ECT
03/13/2000 09:36 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, bperron@columbiaenergy.com

Subject: CES needs for March

CES needs 17dts/day of Mountaineer gas for the rest of March.  The request
was made by Kim Novesak??

I will be out this afternoon.  Please call Brian Perrone (703-561-6486) or
Scott Goodell at 713-853-7711.

Thanks


We got a complimentary copy of the 2/1/02 issues and I will print out a couple of copies and put them up near the receptionist.

Alan Comnes


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	11/20/2000 09:45 AM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 11-20-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 20, 2000.  Please note that
the credit limits in the spreadsheet reflect one-tenth of the actual credit
limit that we have assigned for a given counterparty since the headroom
within ClickPaper is calculated using Sigma Factor * Volume rather than
Pprice * Volume.  We will assign all future limits by using one-tenth of the
assigned credit limit since using the Sigma factor in these calculations
generates a value of roughly one-tenth of the full limit.  Hopefully this
will eliminate some of the recent problems we've had with counterparties
busting their credit limits.  Please call or send a note if you have any
questions.  Thanks.

Walter


This paper will be filed at FERC tomorrow.  Here's a copy for you file.  Ron
will send us the final version of the cover motion tomorrow.

 - 00-10-19 SA Enron White Paper - Final.doc


I just have to brag on myself as my game seldom affords me the opportunity.
Sunday after church, Tom Knox and I played 18 holes at Mimosa.  The weather
was perfect.  While my game stunk overall (118), I did manage par on one par
3 and two par 5's.  The best was at 14 --- a 545 yard par 5.  My drive was
280 yards (the ground was flat!).  I was on the green three feet from the
pin in 3, and then two-putted.  Those three pars however will keep me going
back.  Remember, I had a witness!

Thanks for listening to me brag.  And no, don't expect me to replicate these
feats on our next outing.  Hope all are doing well.  We're remembering
Rachel and Jake in our prayers each day.

David


preciate the note migo.

I had a blast, good to just laugh...about what, who knows.

I had to dash out this morning, so I didn't eat.  But, Karen just left me
voice mail saying the pie was soooo goooood.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:07 AM
To: ttt@cpuc.ca.gov
Subject:

Thanks for coming over last night.  Very fun.  Great to see you.  Really
glad you guys joined in.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Heather,

Just go to your DASH form file and pull out language from another deal just
like this one.  That's how we handle things on the 38th floor.

Kay

Heather Kroll@ECT
09/28/2000 05:52 PM
To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: New DASH

Dan and Kay,

I've added a sentence about the $2mm penalty payment.  Not sure how to
address the regulatory reopener risk.

Any suggestions?

Heather


Hello-
Please note that I have a new email  address:
alamonsoff@riskwaters.com
?
Also, if you have not already submitted a copy  of your presentation for the
Financial Mathematics training course, please let  me know the status ASAP
and if you are planning either to bring copies with you  to the course or if
you will be submitting a copy to me. If you plan on bringing  copies, please
note to bring 40 copies.
?
?
Regards,
Amy Lamonsoff
Training Course  Coordinator


You can run but you can't hide!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 04:32
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           03/07/2001 10:58 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LLC Purchase Letter Agreement

For your reading pleasure.  Enjoy!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 11:03
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           03/01/2001 08:37 AM

To: michael.young@northwestern.com
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: LLC Purchase Letter Agreement

Michael,

Please find attached a draft of the LLC purchase letter agreement for your
review.  Please feel free to call to discuss.

Thanks,

Chris


EOL Deals	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/12/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/12/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 173	 3,256,925	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 37	 843,292
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 134	 2,501,800	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 137	 5,012,548
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 137	 2,489,655	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 77	 8,243,985
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 887	 738,400	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 286	 539,642
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 416	 301,000	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 186	 158,412
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 680	 648,000	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 360	 1,062,687
 	 Real Time (as of 2:30pm, 09/12/01)	 365	 9,200	  	 Real Time (as of 2:30pm, 09/12/01)	 268	 27,403

 	 Grand Total	 2,792	 9,944,980	  	 Grand Total	 1,351	 15,887,969

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 09/12/2001   To: 09/12/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 09/12/2001   To: 09/12/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 5	 54,000	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 18	 75,416
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 0	 0	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 1	 515
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 5	 51,625	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 2	 1,200
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 4	 7,600	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 71	 32,039
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 13	 20,000	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 34	 18,816
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 7	 23,400	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 55	 70,136
 	 Real Time (as of 2:30pm, 09/12/01)	 46	 1,150	  	 Real Time (as of 2:30pm, 09/12/01)	 30	 2,583

 	 Grand Total	 80	 157,775	  	 Grand Total	 211	 200,705

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 09/12/2001   To: 09/12/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Cob (P, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $   29.00
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 2,000	 0	  $   28.31
 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 800	 0	  $   23.69
 	 Mid C (P, Oct-01)	 43,200	 0	  $   31.69
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 2,600	 600	  $   24.17
 	 NP-15 (P, Next Day)	 3,200	 400	  $   29.48
 	 NP-15 (P, Oct-01)	 21,600	 0	  $   32.50
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $   19.63
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 7,200	 400	  $   31.92
 	 Palo (P, Oct-01)	 32,400	 0	  $   31.75
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 1,200	 200	  $   21.35
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 8,000	 1,600	  $   29.29

 	 Grand Total	 123,000	 3,200	  $ 332.78


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London
Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate.
Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU.
Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672
McNair, Darren 7138537955

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:  No Scheduled Outages

EES: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Thanks for keeping up with that, Chris.

Susan

Chris Germany
01/26/2001 05:44 PM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Egan

I changed the Egan volumes for the 30th and 31st from 2599 to 4793 on the
30th and 4794 on the 31st.  This empties out our storage.


Here 'tis, and I'm a yes.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 04:52
PM ---------------------------

John.Normand@enron.com@enron.com on 08/23/2000 11:47:29 AM
Sent by: Arlene.Chapman@enron.com
To: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Bob.Greene@enron.com,
Dennis.Alexander@enron.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com,
Mark.Dobler@enron.com, Ross.Newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

  (superscript: New meeting request from John Normand)

                08/24/2000 12:30 PM Local Time
                08/24/2000 02:00 PM Local Time

  Title:        Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served
  (J.Normand, M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene,
  D.Alexander, B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))
  Location:     -No room information available-

  Chair:        John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

  To (required):   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
  cc (optional):

     John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT wants you to attend a meeting.

On        08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT
For       1 hour 30 minutes
With:          John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Chairperson)
          Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          Kay Mann/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Mark Dobler/NA/Enron (Invited)
          Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)

   Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served (J.Normand,
M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene, D.Alexander,
B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))


Please change the deals in your books.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
07:19 AM ---------------------------
From: Scott Mills@EES on 05/01/2001 08:53 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russ Kavanaugh/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Change to ENA/EES Deals

Can the following deals be rebooked using the current intercompany
methodology:

 Buyer = Enron Energy Services
 Seller = Enron North America (or RMT if these are all financial)

Then what is now the counterparties on the deal will become the books.

These are the only deals that are left that are booked the old way.  I was
hoping to make things consistent.  Two of the deals (EH1958.1, EH4242.5) will
roll off the end of May -the others have months to go.

Thanks for the help

SRM (x33548)


Lorraine Lindberg
11/17/2000 05:17 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Open Season Results

Attached are the results of the Open Season.


========================================================
TWO GREAT DEALS

5% Savings on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air Flights

OR

Weekly Web Specials
========================================================

Take advantage of one of two great values at alaskaair.com and
horizonair.com.  Save 5% on many flights with travel through May 31, 2001.
 Read below for full details. For other great values check out our weekly
web specials for low fares between many of our destinations.

IN THIS ISSUE

Save 5% on Alaska and Horizon Flights online at
alaskaair.com/horizonair.com

  1) 5% Savings - It's This Easy - How Does It Work
  2) 5% Savings Rules

Weekly Web Specials

  1) Web Specials Introduction
  2) Web Specials Valid Dates
  3) Web Specials Fares
  4) Web Specials  Rules
  5) Hilton Hotels Specials

************************************************
Save 5% on Alaska and Horizon Flights
online at alaskaair.com/horizonair.com
************************************************
________________________________________________________
1) 5% SAVINGS - IT'S THIS EASY - HOW DOES IT WORK

Just purchase your Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air flight online at
alaskaair.com or horizonair.com by February 9, 2001 and you'll save 5% on
travel. This discount is valid for travel between now and May 31, 2001, so
you can even save on Spring Break travel! You'll save on EVERY published
fare you purchase online to all destinations, including Mexico or Canada.

While you're there, you can rack up hundreds of bonus miles - whether it's
your first online purchase or hundredth, and now you can even check in and
print your boarding pass online. So find us today and see why
http://www.alaskaair.com and http://www.horizonair.com are your Internet
Savings Providers.

________________________________________________________
2) 5% SAVINGS RULES

The following rules are available at:
http://www2.alaskaair.com/Promo/PromoTerms.asp

The 5% percent discount applies to purchases made online at Alaska.com or
horizonair.com only.  Discount valid for tickets purchased online from now
through February 9, 2001 for travel completed by May 31, 2001. Discount
applies to published fares for flights operated by Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air only. Discount applies to new bookings only - not valid on
pre-existing bookings or previously ticketed reservations. Discount cannot
be combined with other discounts or promotions including Web Specials,
coupons, senior discounts and all unpublished fares. Discount does not
apply to Alaska Airlines Vacations or Horizon Air Holidays purchases. Any
changes to purchased reservations subject to US$50 fee per ticket and any
applicable changes in fare. Itinerary on reservations is limited to a
maximum of four flight numbers. Ground travel between an arrival city and
your next departure city counts towards the four flight number limitation.
Credit card necessary for online purchase. Discount applies to fare level
prior to all applicable taxes, fees, and surcharges. All taxes, fees and
rules of fare purchased apply, including refund, change and travel
restrictions. Discount subject to change without notice and other
restrictions may apply.

************************************************
Weekly Web Specials
************************************************

________________________________________________________
1) WEB SPECIALS INTRODUCTION

Web Specials are a great way to save on flights with Alaska Airlines and
Horizon Air. Web Specials can only be purchased online through the Alaska
Airlines/Horizon Air Web Site.  Hurry, seats are limited, prices and
markets subject to change.

Our Web Specials are available via our home page at
http://www.alaskaair.com or http://www.horizonair.com

________________________________________________________
2) WEB SPECIALS VALID DATES

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air offer Web Specials for travel:

Originating:
Wednesday, January 31, 2001
Thursday, February 1, 2001
Saturday, February 3, 2001

Returning:
Saturday, February 3, 2001
Monday, February 5 2001
Tuesday, February 6, 2001

________________________________________________________
3) WEB SPECIALS FARES

All fares quoted in US dollars, without airport fees and segment tax.

Roundtrip Coach fares for travel between:

Anchorage, AK         -     Cordova, AK           -     $129.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Eugene, OR            -     $359.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $99.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Kodiak, AK            -     $149.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Oakland, CA           -     $299.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Orange County, CA     -     $319.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Portland, OR          -     $279.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Sitka, AK             -     $209.00
Anchorage, AK         -     Yakutat, AK           -     $129.00
Burbank, CA           -     Eugene, OR            -     $229.00
Burbank, CA           -     Seattle, WA           -     $179.00
Cordova, AK           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $129.00
Eugene, OR            -     Anchorage, AK         -     $359.00
Eugene, OR            -     Burbank, CA           -     $229.00
Eugene, OR            -     Reno, NV              -     $129.00
Eugene, OR            -     Sacramento, CA        -     $179.00
Eugene, OR            -     Seattle, WA           -     $69.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Anchorage, AK         -     $99.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $499.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Seattle, WA           -     $349.00
Fairbanks, AK         -     Spokane, WA           -     $459.00
Juneau, AK            -     Las Vegas, NV         -     $309.00
Juneau, AK            -     Oakland, CA           -     $289.00
Juneau, AK            -     Yakima, WA            -     $269.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Burbank, CA           -     $179.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     Medford, OR           -     $379.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     San Diego, CA         -     $379.00
Ketchikan, AK         -     San Francisco, CA     -     $349.00
Kodiak, AK            -     Anchorage, AK         -     $149.00
Las Vegas, NV         -     Juneau, AK            -     $309.00
Las Vegas, NV         -     Redmond, OR           -     $189.00
Las Vegas, NV         -     Seattle, WA           -     $179.00
Los Angeles, CA       -     Yakima, WA            -     $229.00
Medford, OR           -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $379.00
Medford, OR           -     Oakland, CA           -     $179.00
Medford, OR           -     Ontario, CA           -     $239.00
Medford, OR           -     Phoenix, AZ           -     $239.00
Medford, OR           -     Portland, OR          -     $69.00
Medford, OR           -     Seattle, WA           -     $99.00
Oakland, CA           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $299.00
Oakland, CA           -     Juneau, AK            -     $289.00
Oakland, CA           -     Medford, OR           -     $179.00
Ontario, CA           -     Medford, OR           -     $239.00
Ontario, CA           -     Portland, OR          -     $179.00
Orange County, CA     -     Anchorage, AK         -     $319.00
Orange County, CA     -     Redmond, OR           -     $239.00
Pendleton, OR         -     Portland, OR          -     $59.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $499.00
Phoenix, AZ           -     Medford, OR           -     $239.00
Portland, OR          -     Anchorage, AK         -     $279.00
Portland, OR          -     Medford, OR           -     $69.00
Portland, OR          -     Ontario, CA           -     $179.00
Portland, OR          -     Pendleton, OR         -     $59.00
Portland, OR          -     Redmond, OR           -     $79.00
Portland, OR          -     San Francisco, CA     -     $109.00
Portland, OR          -     Spokane, WA           -     $60.00
Redmond, OR           -     Las Vegas, NV         -     $189.00
Redmond, OR           -     Orange County, CA     -     $239.00
Redmond, OR           -     Portland, OR          -     $79.00
Redmond, OR           -     San Jose, CA          -     $179.00
Redmond, OR           -     Seattle, WA           -     $79.00
Reno, NV              -     Eugene, OR            -     $129.00
Reno, NV              -     Seattle, WA           -     $119.00
Sacramento, CA        -     Eugene, OR            -     $179.00
San Diego, CA         -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $379.00
San Diego, CA         -     Yakima, WA            -     $239.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Ketchikan, AK         -     $349.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Portland, OR          -     $109.00
San Francisco, CA     -     Yakima, WA            -     $179.00
San Jose, CA          -     Redmond, OR           -     $179.00
San Jose, CA          -     Seattle, WA           -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Eugene, OR            -     $69.00
Seattle, WA           -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $349.00
Seattle, WA           -     Las Vegas, NV         -     $179.00
Seattle, WA           -     Medford, OR           -     $99.00
Seattle, WA           -     Redmond, OR           -     $79.00
Seattle, WA           -     Reno, NV              -     $119.00
Seattle, WA           -     San Jose, CA          -     $109.00
Seattle, WA           -     Yakima, WA            -     $59.00
Sitka, AK             -     Anchorage, AK         -     $209.00
Spokane, WA           -     Fairbanks, AK         -     $459.00
Spokane, WA           -     Portland, OR          -     $60.00
Yakima, WA            -     Juneau, AK            -     $269.00
Yakima, WA            -     Los Angeles, CA       -     $229.00
Yakima, WA            -     San Diego, CA         -     $239.00
Yakima, WA            -     San Francisco, CA     -     $179.00
Yakima, WA            -     Seattle, WA           -     $59.00
Yakutat, AK           -     Anchorage, AK         -     $129.00

Additional markets are available at:
http://shopping.alaskaair.com/webspecials/start.asp
Check the Alaska Web Specials page periodically as additional markets and
dates may be added.

________________________________________________________
4) WEB SPECIALS RULES

* Valid on Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air only.
* Seats are limited and may not be available on all flights/dates.
* Offer is for a very limited time and is subject to change without notice.
* Valid on new bookings only.
* Reservations must be made using the Alaska Airlines Web Site. Tickets
require immediate purchase by credit card when reservations are made.
* Ticketing will be electronic, using Instant Ticket services.
* Tickets are non-refundable, non-changeable and are of no value after the
last date of your planned travel.
* Fares quoted do not include Passenger Facilities Charges of up to $18 or
segment fees of $2.75 per flight segment. A flight segment is defined as
one takeoff and one landing.
* Other restrictions apply.

________________________________________________________
5) HILTON HOTEL SPECIALS

For special value rates at Hilton Hotels in Alaska Airlines cities visit
the Hilton web site at:
http://www.hilton.com/specials/values/akairvalues.html

========================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about
our great products and prices, you can unsubscribe by visiting our Web
site at http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp

Please do not respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be
answered.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 11:39 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
01/26/2001 10:43 AM
To: craiggannett@dwt.com
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: COB Exports denied

Craig, - In addition, it is our understanding that the ISO has not cut
transmission capacity to Southern California, although that action would have
the same effect as cutting transmission to the north.

Jim - I have forwarded this information to Paul & Alan so they can pursue
this issue with the Governors.  Could we also give this information to
Clearing Up, if they promised not to quote us?  Do you think that would be
helpful?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 10:46 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
01/26/2001 10:26 AM
To: craiggannett@dwt.com
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, csandhe@enron.com, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: COB Exports denied

From an operational perspective, during a Stage 3 Emergencies, the ISO has
three options available to keep the lights on.   It can (1) buy more power
(under its DOE granted Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power
transactions, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export power from
its system.  The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero transmission
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users can't get
capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that the ISO
gets cheaper power over customers in the NW.

I was thinking of a political approach to solving this problem.  I was
wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to
write a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get
Steve Wright to sign on given that this  situation must make it more
difficult for him to balance his budget.

The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there
would be if BPA engaged in such actions and that California is simply  trying
to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.  It could also point out
that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's
Section 202(c) orders to get the power it needs for an emergency and that
this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and
reasonable rate determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.  I wouldn't
bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.  I don't
think we want to encourage that.

What do you think?  Call me.


peter, please see below. would like the lawyers  to see and then we can
redline v your draft.
do you have ucc run to confirm not pledged now?
gerald, can you confirm that now all in et gas as peter has heard it is?
assume you are ok with protective ucc filed on our part too.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


In response to some questions you had regarding cost to pursue the Global
Intelligence project, the project team has put together a ball park costing.
To let you know where we are and how things are proceeding, I have also put
together a high level status summary.  Please review and let me know if you
have any questions.  As mentioned in the document, we are proceeding with
project development until directed otherwise.


I'll take all the help and advise that you wish to offer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:03 PM
To:	Booth, Chris
Subject:	RE: NorthWestern Call Option

And me?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Booth, Chris
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Jacoby, Ben
Cc:	Mann, Kay; Vos, Theresa
Subject:	NorthWestern Call Option

Ben,

I will coordinate the $5,112,535 payment to NorthWestern with Theresa.

Chris

 << File: Blue Dog Remaining GE Payments.xls >>


Shawna Johnson

Amy w/conf. rm.3-3974


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041705.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


556889
the days are in wrong


In This Email:
Share Our Strength
Great Wine and Gifts
Wine Team Gift Picks
Heidrun Mead Adds Traditional Sparkle to the Holidays
Special Holiday Offer

Share Our Strength

At wine.com, not only do we have thousands of wines and gift ideas --
we also have a way to make them go further during the holidays. For a
limited time, every bottle of SOS Handley Cellars Pinot Noir
purchased at wine.com will result in a donation of $1 to Share Our
Strength, the national hunger-fighting organization. During this time
of celebration, we want to share some of the bounty with people truly
in need.

To learn more about each item listed below, simply click on its name!

Please check our homepage to view holiday shipping deadlines
at wine.com.

_____________________________________________________________________

Great Wine and Gifts

Handley Cellars Pinot Noir SOS Cuvee, Anderson Valley,
California, $15.00
One dollar from each bottle sold goes directly to Share Our Strength,
a nonprofit organization working to alleviate and prevent hunger and
poverty around the world. Light to medium in body with red berry
fruit, mellow tannins, and a peppery finish.

Wine-Filled Chocolate, $15.00
A dozen rich chocolates encase crisp Chardonnay, luscious Merlot, and
creamy port, boxed for holiday giving. Sweets for the sweet -- or not
so sweet -- on your list.

Christmas Dinner Wines, $59.00
A comprehensive, can't-miss three-pack to accompany Christmas dinner:
a delicious French bubbly, a lush and creamy Australian Chardonnay,
and an elegant red Bordeaux, packaged in a handsome wine.com
gift box.

A Century of Wine, $40.00
Covering 100 years of wine history and lore, 16 of the world's finest
wine writers and experts explore topics in politics, economics,
geography, science, technology, and lifestyle. Full of stories,
facts, and visuals, this richly illustrated book will appeal to all.

Bubbly Duet, $28.00
A deliciously dry and creamy bubbly from the south of France and an
impressive, elegant sparkler from Italy made by the traditional
Champagne method. Comes in a handsome wine.com gift box.

Dom. J. Laurens Cremant de Limoux Brut Blanc de Blancs,
France, $11.00
Whether you're looking for a bubbly for a crowd or are simply
hankering after a dry sparkling wine that won't break the bank,
Domaine Laurens Blanc de Blancs Brut -- owned by Michel Dervin, a
young, dynamic Champagne winemaker -- is a perfect choice.

_____________________________________________________________________

Wine Team Gift Picks

We count on our crack Wine Team for expert advice all year long, so
it's only natural that, during the holidays, we also tap their
expertise for wine-related gifts. Following are some of their
suggestions of highly useful accessories available from wine.com,
symbiotically paired with wines that underscore their value
(and vice versa).

Burke Owens:
As a sommelier, I've worked with a wide variety of corkscrews, from a
Swiss Army knife to the oh-so-refined French Laguiole. My favorite
for general home and party use is the Screwpull LX Leverpull. And
since this indomitable tool is affectionately known as the T2 in
honor of Arnold Schwarzenegger's Terminator, what better wine to open
with it than another magnificent Austrian, the lush, floral, vibrant
1999 Nigl Gruner Veltliner Siri Senftenberg.

Peter Marks:
You can never have too many Champagne flutes, especially during the
holidays, when flinging them into the fireplace becomes second
nature. The practical and affordable Riedel Cuvee/Prestige flutes
First, though, make sure you drain them of the A.R. Lenoble Blanc de
Blancs Grand Cru, Champagne you poured.

Jeff Prather:
For people eager to learn about wine, Andrea Immer has just come out
with an excellent primer: Great Wine Made Simple. Andrea is my kinda
gal -- she just wants to have fun with wine, but her credentials are
impeccable. She covers all the basics in a readable, easily
understandable, down-to-earth style, and -- since the only real way
to learn about wines is to taste a wide range of them -- she suggests
illustrative wines at the end of each chapter. As it happens,
wine.com has created special wine packs from Andrea's
recommendations, the first of which is entitled The Big Six Wine
Grapes. This way you can give the whole thoughtful package in one
fell swoop, and your recipient will find out exactly how appetizing
education can be.

Diana Jacklich:
Another great way to learn about wine is our Wines of the World Club,
which delivers a new set of wines for tasting every month. Then,
after you've hooked up your newbie connoisseur with the fabulous gift
of wine, they'll need a way to open it -- and fast! The Rabbit
Corkscrew will have them making a toast to you in the blink of
an eye.

Bo Thompson:
What to do if you find yourself shopping for the special wine
collector who has every new wine under the sun? How about the kind of
pedigree that only age can provide? In the 1970s, Spring Mountain
Vineyards, under the directorship of Charlie Ortman, made truly
distinctive Cabernet Sauvignons that speak strongly of "Old Napa
Valley." Venerable wines like these need special care, for which I
recommend Riedel decanters: Handmade by crystal artisans in Germany,
these beautiful vessels are the very best in the world, with both
Single-Bottle and magnum sizes available.

Julian Davies:
As is so often the case with state-of-the-art stuff, our High-tech
Stopper and Stand represent a near-perfect union of function and
form, creating something you don't really need but really ought to
own. It's meant to be used in an opened but unfinished bottle of
wine; I would personally employ it with the 1998 Lolonis Fume Blanc.
Lolonis uses ladybugs instead of pesticides, so what better way to
keep those darn bugs out of the bottle?

Finally, when in doubt, check out the Wine Team's 12 Days of
Christmas holiday case -- an all-purpose, international selection of
stellar wines.

_____________________________________________________________________

Heidrun Mead Adds Traditional Sparkle to the Holidays

If you're looking for something stimulating and different for the
holidays, consider a bottle of sparkling mead from the Heidrun
Meadery. Using honey rather than grapes, meadmaking is an ancient
craft that this Northern California company has elevated to an art.
Fermented from different blends of nectars -- apple, blackberry,
clover, fennel, sunflower, morning glory, alfalfa -- Heidrun
sparklers are refreshingly clean and delicate, suggestive of honey
yet undeniably dry; each varietal offers a range of floral, herbal,
and fruity notes, along with a woodsy, earthy undercurrent. Served
chilled in flutes, like fine Champagne, it's a wonderful aperitif or
accompaniment to a meal (and an especially attractive one to
sensitive wine drinkers, as no sulfites are used in the process). Try
a bottle during the holidays and discover a delightfully new old
perspective on wine.

_____________________________________________________________________

Special Holiday Offer: An Extra Month in the Discovery Club

For friends, family, and business associates, the wine.com Discovery
Club can constitute a monthly surprise delivered to their doorstep: a
package of hand-selected wines with detailed tasting notes, recipes,
educational materials, and other stimulating stuff. This week, if you
send in a gift subscription to the three-month program, the recipient
will get an additional free month in the club (four months total).
Memberships start at $27.50 per month.

_____________________________________________________________________

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS NEWSLETTER, go to:
http://wine1.m0.net/m/u/vin/vv.asp?e=jdasovic%40enron.com


I would like to participate in this focus group, however, I will be returning
from Austin on Friday morning following the Enron scholarship dinner the
night before.  I am scheduled to land at Hobby at 8:45 am.  It is unlikely
that I will be in the Enron Building before about 9:15, and I am scheduled to
go into a meeting at 9:30 that involves a number of players and would be
difficult to reschedule.  If your responses from participants for the Friday
session is thin, and you schedule another time, please let me know.

I have been out of the office on business for the last several days
(recruiting at UT yesterday) and returned mid-morning today to a full
schedule.  I am just now reading your e:mail and therefore could not respond
by noon today as you had asked.  --Sally

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
08/31/2000 11:49 AM
Sent by: Karen Davis@ENRON
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Focus Group Invitation - PRC Representatives

Sally,

The Associate & Analyst Programs are conducting Focus Group Sessions to
gather feedback regarding the Mid-Year 2000 PRC Process.  You have been
identified as a participant in the PRC Representative session. Organizational
Development Consultants from Corporate Human Resources will facilitate the
sessions.  We encourage your participation and welcome your feedback as we
prepare for the year-end performance assessment process.  The logistics are
as follows:

Friday, September 8, 2000
9:00am - 10:30am
Location - EB32C2

Please RSVP to Constance Charles at 3-5614 or by email no later than
Wednesday, September 6th at 12:00 noon.  Refreshments will be provided.

I look forward to receiving your feedback.

Thank you,
Charlene Jackson


I am calling Ken Lay's office this afternoon to request that he speak to Andy
Card about lining up Vice President Cheney as the  dinner speaker on the 21.
So far this task has been in Sprint's hands.   Because this is not nailed
down, Phil Cassidy today asked that Ken put in a call to Card.  FYI


right now i guess we have 6 - i have not heard back from boone.  val said he would stop by if they were back in town by then.  i didn't have mitch's e-mail so you may want to forward to him and i will talk to hull.

i guess we could have about 10 people.

what do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blanchard, Timothy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:54 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	Super Bowl

What's the plan?


Jeff,

As you requested, here is Dan's very rough draft from yesterday with some comments from me.  I'm supposed to be getting a new draft soon.

Sue


I FIGURED

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'll get over it, I'm just being a baby!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

why thats no good

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Yeah, but I am in a depressed mood and I want to go home and sleep.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

are you doing anything

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

I want to leave so bad!