NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
Breaking News : posted Aug 15, 11:27 AM
PG&E Suspends Open Season for 1.2 Bcf/d of Pipe Capacity
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) has announced that it has suspended its open season for additional intrastate pipeline capacity that was scheduled to close Aug. 30. The California utility said it made the decision not to go forward with the open season at this time while conducting a corporate wide review related to its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.
PG&E emphasized that the open season was being deferred, not canceled, and that shippers would have a minimum of 30 days to prepare bids for service when it resumed.
"I don't want to say that we were premature in beginning the open season," said PG&E spokeswoman Christy Dennis, who noted that the company simply "has pulled back for the moment" due to the "huge reorganization process" related to the company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Shippers shouldn't view this as a "huge red flag" on the project.
Dennis could not cite a specific date when the open season would resume, but she said "it should be reinstituted within the next few months." Shippers will be notified then, she noted.
The utility first announced the open season in late May, saying that it planned to offer more than 1.2 Bcf/d of backbone capacity on the Redwood, Baja and Silverado paths on which gas from Malin, OR; Topock, AZ, and California in-state gas production is delivered to PG&E's local transmission system and other pipelines. Included in the open season was an anticipated 200 MMcf/d expansion of the Redwood path from Malin.
The open season initially was to have closed on July 31, but PG&E extended it until Aug. 30. The utility, which currently transports more than 3 Bcf/d of gas in central and northern California, projected that the additional in-state pipeline capacity would be in service by Jan. 1, 2003, but the open season suspension could very well push back the date.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001
05:56 PM ---------------------------

Katrina Burton
03/07/2001 05:09 PM
Sent by: Katrina Burton
To: Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron@Enron, Gina Taylor/OTS/Enron
cc:

Subject: Stan Horton's Presentation

Sorry for the delay.

Katrina Burton
5-4498


Pat --

Are we doing dinner with Keith Tuesday?

Jim


Bilateral
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
13:48 ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
12/07/2000 13:48
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark.Houldsworth@redmeteor.com

Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Please can you send a confidentiality agreement to Mark as we have a meeting
tomorrow morning at 9am.

Thanks

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/19/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------

Carlos Giron <cgiron@mindspring.com> on 11/18/2000 09:58:39 AM
To: Angela Teer-WIlliams <angela.teerwilliams@gte.net>, Darron C Giron
<dgiron@enron.com>, Glenn Bohan <gbohan@home.com>, Grant Whipple
<grant.w@mindspring.com>, Jennifer Iu <jenniferiu@yahoo.com>, Joe Dubret
<jdubret@flash.net>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: Fw:]

Return-Path: <mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org>
Received: from mail.datasync.com ([205.216.82.35]) by
fb04.eng00.mindspring.net (Mindspring Mail Service) with ESMTP id
t1bbnj.2deb.37kbi5a for <cgiron@mindspring.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:19:31
-0500 (EST)
Received: from AOAhusb1 ([206.251.166.92]) by mail.datasync.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3+Datasync) with SMTP id QAA18626 for <cgiron@mindspring.com>;
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:15:01 -0600
Message-ID: <000f01c050e2$ff64c900$5ca6fbce@AOAhusb1>
From: "Michael Massimi" <mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org>
To: <cgiron@mindspring.com>
Subject: Fw:
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:08:50 -0600
Organization: Audubon Institute/Aquarium of the Americas
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C050B0.AC709760"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

??? ???
----- Original Message -----
From: Rich  Toth
To: mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:30 PM

?
?
 - Fword.wav


Jean received a lovely bouquet of flower Friday.  She thinks it came from one
of us, but I think it must have come from her boyfriend.  Were any of us
being very thoughtful on Friday?


John,

I am planning to come to Houston Wednesday and Thursday to sit with the East
desk. Unless that is going to create problems, would you mind letting them
know that I'm coming.

Chris


Trading Profits

P. Allen  200
M. Grigsby 463
Rest of Desk 282

Total  945

I view my bonus as partly attributable to my own trading and partly to the
group's performance.  Here are my thoughts.

  Minimum  Market   Maximum

Cash  2 MM   4 MM   6 MM
Equity  2 MM   4 MM   6 MM

Here are Mike's numbers.  I have not made any adjustments to them.

  Minimum  Market   Maximum

Cash  2 MM   3 MM   4 MM
Equity  4 MM   7 MM   12 MM

I have given him an "expectations" speech, but you might do the same at some
point.

Phillip


Stinson,

Let's chat about it.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
10:36 AM ---------------------------
From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 02:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW:

What are your thoughts regarding this?

Frank


Dan:  please see if the attached draft works.  My extension is 35620.  Sara


Megan,

Please see the message below.  The pricing on deal 391125 was incorrect;
should be HSC GD-.04.  I corrected the deal ticket.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001
10:57 AM ---------------------------

mkhenderson@duke-energy.com on 01/10/2001 10:42:30 AM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Intraday Eastrans Nominations change for 9/6/00 and Nomination for
9/7/00

Please pass the following information to Meagan Parker.  Her pricing isn't
matching.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on
01/10/2001 10:41 AM ---------------------------

Marta K Henderson
09/06/2000 03:39 PM

To:   dfarmer@enron.com, John A. Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC
cc:   John A. Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna J Dobb/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC,
      Sharon Beemer/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC

Subject:  Intraday Eastrans Nominations change for 9/6/00 and Nomination
      for 9/7/00

As follow-up documentation for the Intraday sale on 9/6/00, the following
states the pricing for the redeliveries:

8500 MMBTU from Fuels Cotton Valley priced per Paragraph 1a of the Contract
Price (per MMBTU) section in the Transaction Agreement.
10955 MMBTU at ETGS Carthage Hub Tailgate priced per Paragraph 1c of the
Contract Price (per MMBTU) section in the Transaction Agreement
10545 MMBTU at CIPCO/Mobile Beaumont  which is priced differently than
Paragraph 1b of the Contract Price (per MMBTU) section in the Transaction
Agreement.  The price for 10545 MMBTU for 9/6/00 will be HSC Daily plus
$.04/MMBTU.

Please confirm the above by replying to this E-Mail message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on
09/06/2000 01:07 PM ---------------------------

Marta K Henderson
09/06/2000 09:58 AM

To:   Darrel F. Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John A. Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Michael R.
      Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Bruce McMills/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC,
      William E. Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Donna C.
      Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Julia A. Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Dora J.
      Levy/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, briley@enron.com, dfarmer@enron.com,
      carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, Sharon Beemer/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC,
      Connie Wester/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC
cc:

Subject:  Intraday Eastrans Nominations change for 9/6/00 and Nomination
      for 9/7/00

Deliveries continue to be 30,000 MMBtu/dy

The redeliveries will be:

8500 from Fuels Cotton Valley
10955 to HPL's Cartwheel Agreement at Carthage
10545 at Mobil Beaumont

Effective for 9/7/00, deliveries to Eastrans continue to be 30,000 MMBtu/dy

The redeliveries will be:

8500 from Fuels Cotton Valley
21500 to HPL's Cartwheel Agreement at Carthage


Tom did some footwork and questioning and determined where the additional Big
Cowboy production is coming from.  Apparently, HPL cut a deal to purchase
this gas at "HPL meters" at Rocher and Big Cowboy #2, so the gas had been
pathed on the gathering agreement into our pipe.  All along, these volumes
have been flowing into the GEPL/Big Cowboy system and on to King Ranch.  Tom
and I spoke with Clem about the most correct way to reflect the physical and
determined that a Transport Usage ticket needed to be put into place, as IM
Wellhead, to transfer the volumes from HPL to GEPL and into the plant.

We unpathed the gathering agreement and brokered the HPL purchase to the TU
tickets and moved the gas on our transport on GEPL to the plant, effective
April 1.  This resolves our overproduction issues for April and forward.

Please let me know if you have any further questions, comments, or
information to add.

Mary


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001
09:50 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           02/26/2001 04:12 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Travel Arrangements

Vince:  I thought you might want to have Mark's itinerary...

Molly
---------------------- Forwarded by Molly Magee/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:11
PM ---------------------------
From: Sasha Divelbiss/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/26/2001 11:30 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Travel Arrangements

FYI - On the travel arrangements it shows that the car will drop him off at
the hotel.  We talked about this and if he would like a different location he
will just let the driver know.

Thanks
Sasha


No, I can figure it out.  How many folks?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [SMTP:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 5:33 PM
> To: PREISINGER@tmh.tmc.edu
> Subject: RE: This weekend
>
>
> Yes, we will be having it at Pastor Beth's.  Do you need directions?  It's
> at 7:00 pm.
>
>
>
>
>                     "Preisinger,
>
>                     Andrea"               To:     "'Tana.Jones@enron.com'"
> <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
>                     <PREISINGER@tm        cc:
>
>                     h.tmc.edu>            Subject:     RE: This weekend
>
>
>
>                     05/09/2000
>
>                     03:55 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I didn't get it.  Are we dining at Pastor Beth's?
>
> I know how that software changeover thing can be...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Tana.Jones@enron.com [SMTP:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Tuesday, May 09, 2000 3:00 PM
> > To:     PREISINGER@tmh.tmc.edu
> > Subject:     Re: This weekend
> >
> >
> > I just forwarded directions to Pastor Beth's and a note about the number
> > of
> > people.  Did you get it?  We just got Windows 2000 and I'm having
> trouble
> > with my emails...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                     "Preisinger,
> >
> >                     Andrea"               To:     "'Tana Jones'"
> > <Tana_Jones@enron.com>
> >                     <PREISINGER@tm        cc:
> >
> >                     h.tmc.edu>            Subject:     This weekend
> >
> >
> >
> >                     05/09/2000
> >
> >                     02:35 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Just wondering how many people we will be serving.  Also, are you going
> to
> > send directiosn to you house?
> >
> > Thanks-
> >
> > Andrea
> >
> >
>
>


Please register me as Vince Kaminski's free guest at the Houston session of
the above conference on 31/8 and 1/9.

Many thanks,
Steve Leppard
Enron Europe Research Group


Just a reminder that until the finance arrangements are fixed and the rules
are clear, Enron can't incur any hard costs related to the Virginia Power
deal.  This means Enron can't obligate itself to purchase any equipment or
materials, or enter into any services agreements except for studies, etc.

I will try to get some clarification on what can be done at this point, and
will pass it along as soon as possible.

Kay


Kay,

Unfortunately, I don't have an electronic version of the option agreement.
Kathleen Carnahan will get you a hard copy "right now".

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:36 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Could you email me the option agreement?

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 02:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

I think the invoice was for between $20,000 and $30,000, but I can't
remember.  AEW has the invoice.  This probably will not be the final as we
will need to work with them in discussions with DERM on delaying the landfill
closure and in moving jurisdiction of the project from CZAB to the County
Commissioners.   I think Shutts & Bowen (who may get stiffed by their client
if this deal blows up) and Certosa Holdings would be open to any suggestions
and we need to renegotiate the option anyway.  Shall I call and suggest this
this flat fee for retooling the option agreement to them or shall we do it
together?  I,m not sure I could explain to them acequately the idiosyncrasies
of our accounting requirements.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

How much is it and should this be the final amount?  One thought I have is
that maybe we can retool the option agreement so that we pay them a flat fee,
which is enough to cover the expenditures.  Don't know if this works, but it
is one thought.  What do you think?

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 01:50 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

One more thing on the SDEC project:  According to the option agreement we
executed last October, we agreed to reimburse Certosa Holdings for actual
third party costs that they incurred in support of our necessary
applications, submittals and in seeking local approval.  Several weeks ago,
we recieved an invoice from Shutts & Bowen, attorney for Certosa Holdings
requesting reimbursement pursuant to the contract.  I forwarded this invoice
on th Ann Elizabeth not necessarily to pay for but to review considering this
whole soft cost hard cost discussion.  I recieved another call this morning
from Shutts & Bowen asking about the invoice.  What should I do?
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Greg,

You can call me on whatever you have, including Midway, SDEC and Medley
Dunn.  If I have a problem getting to something, I'll find help.

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 10:50 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Kay,

Ann Elizabeth did not provide a designated hitter for the South Dade Energy
Center (Dade Development Company LLC is Optionee, Certosa Holdings is
Optionor) nor did she provide one for tne Medley Dunn project.  I have been
told that the Dunns are considering backing off their ultimatums that they
gave Ann Elizabeth and I regarding taxes to the town and assumption of
enviromental liability.  Who do I talk to about the Dunn contract while Ann
Elizabeth is out?
 -----Original Message-----
From:  White, Ann Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:33 PM
To: gkrause@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven; Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Carnahan,
Kathleen
Cc: Milligan, Taffy
Subject: AEW's backup

Kay Mann is the designated hitter for the Pompano and Deerfied projects while
I'm on vacation.  I've given her a down load of the status of Greg and
Steve's projects.  Chris Boehler at A&K will be the designated hitter for
Midway.  I'm not going to check my voice mail while I'm gone but, if
necessary, here are the contact numbers while I'm gone.

Walter and Marlena Schilling  011-49-8218-89351 schilling.jun@freenet.de

Monika and Bernhard Steinacher 011-49-8232-8932 m.steinacher@schwabmuenchen.de

If you call, Walter and Bernhard and Bernhard's daughter, Susanne, speak very
good English.  Monika's isn't bad.  Marlena may get flustered and hang up on
you.

Best of luck at Deerfield and hope to see Pompano on track when I get back in
the office on June 11th.  Kay is planning on going to Florida on June 12 for
the moratorium hearing and the rezoning hearing.


Great food for thought.  Thanks.  My only concern is timing.  Likely to be
spending the balance of the week (tomorrow and Friday) on prep for the
FERC/House subcomittee hearings. We can discuss further on the staff meeting
call tomorrow.

Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/06/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Strategy

I'd like us to take a stab at drafting the California strategy so we can
present initial thoughts at the meeting I'm hoping to set up next Wednesday
in D.C.  (Discussed under separate e-mail).  To that end, I suggest the
following outline for the strategy:

What are our specific business interests in California?  Let's be as specific
as possible, but limit the list to "hot buttons."   In this regard, Jim
Steffes identified "the imposition of price caps in the summer of 2001" as
the hot button.  Are there others?
What are the forums we expect will affect our business interests?
For each forum, how do we want to posture Enron?  Do we want to be the most
aggressive company?  Do we want to act alone?  Do we want to work only in
coalitions?  What about IEP?  What will motivate us to act independently?
What is our overall strategy?  Do we want to go back to our pre-1999
rhetoric?  We can scream louder than anyone else that California didn't do it
right..  Peace will be gone ... should we breach Steve K.'s promise to play
nice?  Do we want to tear down AB 1890 or shore it up?
Forum-by-forum identify our:  (a) goals; (b) strategy; (c) what we (Enron)
want out of the forum.  For example, re:  the legislature, do we want to
identify legislation that we will seek affirmatively?  If not, why not?


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


Industry Group Analysis

This Week: Big Chart Update for the Week of January 7

1.	Introduction
2.	Groups That Are Heating Up
3.	Groups That Are Cooling Off
4.	On The Radar Screen This Week
5.	Disclaimer

***********************Our Sponsor*************************
New FREE Report. "Armadillo Stocks: 5 Investments That Win By Never
Losing" shows how to make BIG PROFITS without big risks.  It's FREE.
Nothing to buy, try or cancel. Click here:
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0ZX110
***********************************************************

1.	Introduction

Sentiment that the economy will rebound later this year has
resulted in investors looking past the upcoming earnings
season and instead increasing their level of risk tolerance.
This change in sentiment has resulted in industry groups such
as Electronics/Semiconductors {.DSE} and
Homes/Hotels-Motels-Inns {.HOT} rising on the Big Chart.

Industry Group Analysis is just another of the many great
reasons to be a subscriber to the WallStreetCity website.
Besides great industry group analysis and incredible
stock analysis, you also get access to the world's most
powerful stock screening tool on the planet, ProSearch,
all in one subcription package. However, we give you a
30-day FREE trial to this service to make sure it suits
you, so give us a try.

Click below to take a 30-day FREE trial.

http://subs.wallstreetcity.com/c/go/XPRO/WSCE-bc010802?s=S601&D=XWSC
____________________________________________________________

2.	Groups That Are Heating Up

Growing optimism for an economic recovery has driven the
ranking for Electronics/Semiconductors {.DSE} up to the 98th
percentile.  Investors have been ignoring valuations in order
to avoid risking the next big run up in chip stocks.
Historically, semiconductor stocks have appreciated in price
6-9 months before a recovery occurs and with news of price
increases coming out of Asia, the current sentiment is that a
bottom has been reached by the industry.  Chip stocks that
have recently traded upwards include Globespan {GSPN}, Amkor
Technology {AMKR}, Taiwan Semiconductor {TSM}, Micron
Technology {MU}, and ASM International {ASMI}.

Homes/Hotels-Motels-Inns {.HOT} has been making a material
rebound, rising from the 2nd percentile to the 50th
percentile during the past five weeks.   Analysts have been
gradually upping their ratings on stocks such as Fairmont
Hotels {FHR}, Host Marriott {HOT}, and Hilton {HLT} on the
basis of an expected economic recovery, a decrease in the
rate of revenue decline, and valuation.  Notably, growth for
many companies in this group is not expected to return until
the second half of the year, at the earliest, but increased
confidence over airport security could cause industry
conditions to improve sooner.

Other groups with rising rankings include Basic/Metal {.MET},
Broadcasting/Television {.BTV}, Computer/Components {.DCO},
Home/Pet & Supplies {.PET}, Machinery/Machine Tools {.MMT},
Publishing/Graphics/Supplies {.GSE}, and
Services/Advertising {.ADV}.

To view the Big Chart click the link below.

http://www.wallstreetcity.com/commentary/commentary_group_rotation.asp
____________________________________________________________

3.	Groups That Are Cooling Off

Despite the increased level of risk tolerance being priced
into the market, Drugs/Biotechnology {.DBI} has lagged on the
Big Chart.  Rankings for the industry group have fallen for
five consecutive weeks.  Part of this decline has been caused
by news events over the past few days.  First, Abgenix {ABGX}
announced on Thursday that its rheumtoid arthritis drug,
ABX-IL8, failed to show stastical improvements.  Then,
ImClone Systems {IMCL} began tumbling on Friday as word about
a negative article in the The Cancer Letter spread.  The
newsletter stated that FDA is refusing to review IMCL's
application for Erbitux, a treatment for colon cancer.  The
two announcements are sharp a reminder of the risks inherent
with with many biotechnology companies.

Other groups with rising rankings include Basic/Metal {.MET},
Broadcasting/Television {.BTV}, Computer/Components {.DCO},
Home/Pet & Supplies {.PET}, Machinery/Machine Tools {.MMT},
Publishing/Graphics/Supplies {.GSE}, and Services/Advertising
{.ADV}.

To view the Big Chart click the link below.

http://www.wallstreetcity.com/commentary/commentary_group_rotation.asp
____________________________________________________________

4.	On The Radar Screen This Week

Services/Advertising {.ADV} has improved its rank for four
consecutive weeks and now sits just shy of the top quintile.
The industry group is very dependant on economic cycles for
revenue growth and and optimism over a recovery has resulted
in several stocks testing their six-month highs, including
Publicis Group {PUB}, WPP Group {WPPGY}, Catilina Marketing
{POS}, and Omnicom Group {OMC}.  With little in the way of
economic news this week, expect short-term sentiment to
determine the price direction of this group.

To view the Big Chart click the link below.

http://www.wallstreetcity.com/commentary/commentary_group_rotation.asp

***********************Our Sponsor*************************
Tech Buyback Portfolio Posts Stellar Gains: +39.23% YTD!

David Fried knows a stock is undervalued when the company
buys back its shares. That's how he earned 39.23% YTD in
techs while the benchmark Nasdaq fell 21.82%. 'Buy these 5
techs today,' Fried says. Get them with a FREE trial:
http://www.investools.com/c/go/BACK/WSCE-backTX3
**********************************************************

5.	Disclaimer

WallStreetCity's Industry Group Analysis is published solely
for informational purposes and is not a solicitation or an
offer to buy or sell any stock, mutual fund or other security.
The information obtained from internal and external sources
is considered reliable, but has not been independently
verified for accuracy and completeness.  WallStreetCity, its
employees, and/or officers and directors, may from time to
time have a position in the securities mentioned and may sell
or buy such securities.

Trading involves risk, including possible loss of principle
and other losses.  Trading results may vary. No
representations are being made that these techniques will
result in or guarantee profits in trading.  Past performance
is no indication of future results.

REMOVE ME FROM THIS FREE EMAIL LIST
To be removed from the email distribution list for the FREE
WallStreetCity's Industry Group Analysis Commentary, Stock
Search of the Week Commentary, The Week Ahead Commentary
and Updates simply click the link below and hit "Send" on
the email that is launched. (Or copy and paste the email
address below to a new outgoing email message and hit "Send"
on the email that is launched).

mailto:U-A28.146.113719@newsletter.wallstreetcity.com

If you have tried unsubscribing in the past -- and believe
that you received this message in error -- please send an
email to

mailto:yourfeedback@wallstreetcity.com

to voice your concerns and be removed from the list.


Effective today, Northern Border is lifting a firm-only restriction on its 42-inch Monchy/Port of Morgan to Ventura segment. The constraint had been implemented Wednesday due to compressor station outages upstream of Ventura.
El Paso Field Services has scheduled its annual maintenance shutdown of the Waha Plant for Oct. 7-12. Fourteen gathering systems will be shut in.
Capacity of the San Juan Crossover will remain restricted to 570 MMcf/d until repairs are completed on an air leak in the Lincoln Station's turbine, El Paso said.


Kaye:  re:  my vm about John Stoner in California, BEWARE as I may have this
meeting (which is more important)!!!!!!!!!!!  Maybe Stoner can be at the end
of the day here.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 04:51 PM -----

	Craig Clark
	08/17/2000 02:56 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Friday Prepay Meeting

Mary / Sara,

We are trying to work in with your 11.30am - 2pm time slot. Gareth is talking
with V&E to find how they are placed.

We'll let you know.
Craig


Brant and Sara:
Here is a very rough draft of a proposed letter agreement for NGTS.  It
requires some work but hopefully it's a start.  It cannot be finalized until
we see all of the physical and financial confirms and agreements and should
NOT be sent to NGTS until Sara and I are comfortable that it works.
Carol


Susan, here is the additional information you need to attach to the e-mail to
CAC.

---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 07/12/2000
03:40 PM ---------------------------

Frazier King
07/07/2000 03:44 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Transfer Procedures

---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 07/07/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Frazier King
07/07/2000 03:39 PM
To: February 7Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: CAC ITSG/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Transfer Procedures

In order to expedite the time it takes for CAC to make the appropriate LAN,
applications and e-mail changes for transfering employees, CAC has requested
that we provide the following information for transfering employees.

 Effective date:
 Home domain/LAN (if known):
 Social Security Number:
 Phone:
 Room:
 Co #:
 RC #:

You can get this information from the transfering employee when you set up a
time for the exit/entry interview.  This information can be attached to the
normal e-mail we send to CAC.  (See, Shelley's February 7 "go-by" e-mail.  If
you have not saved it, let me know and I will send it to you again.)  CAC
needs the information to get the change the e-mail address of the transfering
employee.

If you have any question, please call.  Thanks!!

Frazier


Matt:

As GSS Business Development transitions the HP relationship for broadband to
your team, there are several issues I wanted to clarify in terms of how the
relationship has been developed and who the contacts have been to date.
Additionally, I outlined the discussion points/action items from this
morning's meeting you held with Jennifer Medcalf and myself.  Per your
request, the HP presentation complete with a listing of HP's business
partners was e-mailed to you this morning.

HP contacts to date:

Bill Lovejoy, Western Gulf Area Sales Manager
Houston, TX
#(713)-439-5587
(Gerry Cashiola's boss)

Gerry Cashiola, sales representative
Houston, TX
#(713)-439-5555
(To date, HP person coordinating the relationship--seeking a short term play)

Greg Pyle, Solution Control Manager
Southeast Region
Austin, TX
(#(512)-257-5735
(Pyle has been playing the business developer role but continues to defer
leadership of the process to Gerry Cashiola)

Daniel Morgridge, Manager of Internet - E-Services long term alliances
Austin, TX
#(512)-257-5736
(Interested in E-services/wireless longer term alliances)

Bill Dwyer, Chief Architect, e-Services Solutions
Cupertino, CA
#(408)-447-5240
(To date, clearly the most knowledgeable person on HP's business
propositions; strong technical, financial background to craft value
propositions.  Gerry Cashiola and Greg Pyle deferred to his judgement in the
11/16th meeting)

Matt,

On November 10th, GSS Business Development took HP through a tour of Enron's
trading floor, the gas control center, and the peaking power plant unit
center on the trading floor.  This tour was one meeting, amongst several,
held in October and November to provide HP a full overview of Enron's
products and services and introduce them to appropriate contacts at Enron
(EBS, GSS buy side -- Peter Goebel).

On November 16th GSS Business Development,  Patrick Tucker, and Dale Clark
outlined 3 possible EBS/HP focus areas  --  connectivity, storage, and
wireless.  Three EBS action items were defined in that meeting:

1) HP was to provide an HP contact on connectivity (to date, Gerry Cashiola
has stalled on providing this).  Sarah-Joy will continue to pursue this
information and get a sense from Gerry Cashiola of what he means by short
term opportunity.  What is HP's time horizon for short term?

2) EBS and GSS/BD was to facilitate a conference call on Storage with Ravi to
explore size and potential scope of opportunity (completed 12/8)

3) GSS/BD was to facilitate a conference call with Peter Goebel, GSS IT
Sourcing Portfolio Leader (set for 12/14)

In conversations with you, Jennifer Medcalf and myself this morning, several
decisions on forward-looking strategy with HP/EBS were confirmed:

Gerry Cashiola has been unable to take control of the process.  More
importantly, despite numerous visits to Enron in which he has had overviews
of Enron's products and services; met with Peter Goebel and his team on the
GSS buy side, and participated in an Experience Enron tour, Gerry has been
unable to define an HP business proposition.  The coordination between
Cashiola (short term initiative) Morgridge (long term, 12-24 months) has
remained unorganized.  These initiatives need to be developed separately.

Clearly,  the conversations with HP need to be elevated to a more senior
level so EBS can work with HP decision makers who can move the relationship
forward at a strategic level.  As the relationship is developed at this
strategic level, shorter term opportunities will crop up along the way.  But
Gerry's short term plans will not be the focus of the EBS/HP relationship,
rather a by-product.  To facilitate this process of elevating the
relationship, Jennifer Medcalf and I are following up with Bill Lovejoy and
Greg Pyle.  Lovejoy's boss is Dan Sytsma, VP of  HP's America's Central
Region.

 In the conference call Thursday, 12/14 with Peter Goebel and HP regarding
wireless initiatives, Peter will support the GSS/BD push for the HP/EBS
initiative by reiterating the following two points:

 a) Enron is already an HP customer; the onus is on HP  to move forward on
the process of building a strategic  relationship  (IBM and Lexmark are only
some of the HP competitors who could push them out of the running)

 b) HP's ability to bring the right people to the table will influence HP's
business relationship process with Enron

 Patrick Tucker and Dale Clark could build their relationship with Bill
Dwyer, Chief Architect e-Services Solutions, (met at the meeting 11/16) in
the near term.  Perhaps, plan a visit to Cupertino, California to see Dwyer
in person.

We look forward to continuing close collaboration with your team on this and
other opportunities.

Sarah-Joy Hunter
Enron Corporation
Global Strategic Sourcing - Business Development
#(713)-345-6541


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 00:00 - 02:00, 05:00, 13:00, 15:00,
and 23:00 in the May 17, 2001 Real-Time Market as well as the following
hours per ECA20001006B to verify prices:

PJM: 00:00 - 03:00, 07:00
OH:  00:00, 03:00, 07:00
HQ:  00:00, 03:00, 07:00
NE:  00:00, 03:00, 07:00

Prices in the May 18, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Sorry - getting ahead of myself.

Bruce


Celebrate  "500"  Master SWAP Agreements !!

    When:   Wednesday, March 7th

    Time:   6:00 - 8:00 p.m.

    Place: Cadillac Bar -- Party Shack room
      1802 Shepherd Drive
      (713) 862-2020

    Please R.S.V.P. by 5 p.m. Monday.


An application called AP Data Viewer.  Accounts payable uses it to retrieve
status on document such as invoice payments, wires, payment requests, etc....

I've just spoken to Pam and I think I'm requesting the right thing but using
the wrong form.  Will you please reject this so I can start all over?

Thanks
Dana

Hope Vargas
09/27/2000 07:14 PM
To: Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sap Security Request

Dana, what is this requesting?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           09/27/2000 04:45 PM

To: SAP Security@enron.com
cc: Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Mendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sap Security Request


Accomplishments:

Delivered all remaining Calme workshops
Delivered all but 1 FICO session still needed (scheduled 3/24) for EECC
Delivered all ESA sessions
Scheduled India's workshops
Finalized NEPCO approach (understanding their issues)
Developed the adjusted user guides (more user friendly)
Worked with training group to modify training approach for 7/1 based on
feedback and issues we've addressed
Had initial discussions to identify the "next" workshops - will focus on
overall design and data flow, consolidations
Average score for the workshop 3.7 out of 4 (4 being high)
Average score for the question "can SAP meet your reporting needs" 2.8 out of
4

Upcoming:
Delivery of NEPCO workshops
Finalization of the NEPCO report list (including overview of ongoing support
processes)

Upcoming (Week of March 20):
Rollout of adjusted user guides
Development and roll out of next phase evaluation forms
Development of new workshop material


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: P
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:


We have made the  following modifications to the EnronOnline applications.

Stack Manager Changes

Fill Order Enhancements - (Effective Tuesday September 25)
?	To fill a Top of Stack order in Stack Manager, Right click on the pink shaded order in the depth window of Stack Manager and select fill.
?	The trader now has the ability to fill limit orders that appear at the top of the trader's stack on both sides.
?	The order will now be filled at the full order volume regardless of the trader's stack volume.
?	Filling an order will not move the trader's price or cause a hedge to occur.

Resize floated stack windows- (Effective Tuesday September 25)

You will now have the ability to resize the stack window to the desired extent.

Website Changes ( Effective Monday September 24)

Limit Order Restrictions on Physical Transactions -
?	Customers will not be allowed to transact with themselves on physical transactions. If a top of stack limit order has been placed on a physical product the counterparty or desk that placed the order will not be allowed to transact on it.
?	If a customer or desk has top of stack limit orders at different prices on both the bid and offer and subsequently moves the price of one so that they are at the same price, both orders will be cancelled. The customer would have effectively transacted with himself.

Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks.

Savita ( X 31787)


Are these the correct dates on Change Order #4?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/16/2000 06:35
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 10/16/2000 09:48:01 AM
To: "Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>,
"'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Revised letter of Sept 29

I believe that this is the most recent version.  Lee, check the dates to make
sure they are right.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 10:17 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent
Subject: FW: Revised letter of Sept 29

Kent,

Please send Kay the Amendment #4 draft (shedule change for Units 19,20,23,24).
I think you had it last.  I can't seem to find it either.

Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:58 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com;
ben.f.jacoby@enron.com; chris.booth@enron.com; Kathleen.Clark@enron.com
Subject: Re: Revised letter of Sept 29

Lee,

Your changes to the letter look fine to me.

I'm attaching the latest version I have on change order #2.  Are we ready
to go with this one?

(See attached file: changeorder#2rev7.doc)

We would like to close out #3 and #4 soon.  I believe GE prepared #4.
Could you send me a copy of the latest draft of #4, as it was inadvertently
deleted from my computer. Meanwhile, I'll work to get you a draft of #3.

Thanks,

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 10/13/2000 08:03:49 AM

To:   kay.mann@enron.com
cc:   michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com,
      ben.f.jacoby@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com

Subject:  Revised letter of Sept 29

 <<SSlttrsept29rev1.doc>>  <<SSlttrsept29rev2.doc>>

Kay,

Attached is a redline version of Sept 29 letter, and clean copy for
sign/send.  The change involves reference to the contract paragraphs that
deal with corrections, enabling Enron and GE to reach agreement on timing
of
performance of corrective work, if we both agreed to a schedule other than
prior to delivery to site.  We recognize that if any of this work has an
impact on your EPC contractor's site work schedule, there maybe other
consequences/remedies, as provided in the contract.

I'll sign and fax.  Hope you all have no objections.

Thanks,

Lee

(See attached file: SSlttrsept29rev1.doc)
(See attached file: SSlttrsept29rev2.doc)

 - Change Order #4.doc


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - 6thsense.jpg


Gary, Can you please provide David the fuel report as requested.  Thanks Dennis

Dennis, can we get a copy of the TW Fuel Report in the field?
---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 02/01/2002 06:44 AM ---------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Yolanda_Bernal@hines.com [mailto:Yolanda_Bernal@hines.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:30 AM
To: benny.galvan@sci-us.com; GalvanD@aetna.com; GuarjadoK@aetna.com;
Gina@clarkbattery.com; lucy@wald-tinkle.com;
maricela_mamott@kindermorgan.com
Subject: Silent Prayer

Now I sit me down in school Where praying is against the rule
For this great nation under God Finds mention of Him very odd.
If Scripture now the class recites, It violates the Bill of Rights.
And anytime my head I bow Becomes a Federal matter now.  Our hair
can be purple, orange or green, That's no offense; it's a freedom scene.
The law is specific, the law is precise. Prayers spoken aloud are a
serious vice. For praying in a public hall Might offend someone with
no faith at all. In silence alone we must meditate, God's name is
prohibited by the state. We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks. They've outlawed guns,
but FIRST the Bible. To quote the Good Book makes me liable. We can
elect a pregnant Senior Queen, And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.
It's "inappropriate" to teach right from wrong, We're taught that such
"judgments" do not belong. We can get our condoms and birth controls,
Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles. But the Ten Commandments
are not allowed, It's scary here I must confess, When chaos reigns the
school's a mess. So, Lord, this silent plea I make: Should I be shot;
My soul please take!


All,

Jim Reyes has accepted an opportunity with Pacific Corp in their Risk Management Group.  I would like to express my appreciation for Jim's contributions to our group and to Enron.  Friday will be his last day with this company.  Please join me in congratulating Jim on his new opportunity.


sold! I'll initiate the call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 3:44 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Ed,

Thursday works for  me. What about 10:30  my time?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 02:43:00 PM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

how about Thursday, July 6?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 3:29 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Ed,

A correction. I shall spend an entire day at PRC (performance review)
on Friday, July 7. Can we do on another day

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 12:40:59 PM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

I'll still be here in Boston so we'd do it over the phone. OK?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:11 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: Re: Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Ed,

Will you be in Houston on that day or we shall do it over the phone?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 09:13:04 AM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  Pre-meeting Weathereffects site cruise

Vince,

How about a pre-meeting web site cruise on Friday, July 7 at 11AM EDT?

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:52 AM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski
Subject: RE: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

July 12, 2:30 it is. I would like the pre-meeting site cruise.
How can we arrange it?

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/30/2000 04:00:53 AM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  RE: Next visit to Houston

Vince,

We're all set for 2:30 on July 12. How about a pre-meeting web site cruise
on Friday, July 7 at 11AM EDT?

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 5:04 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Shirley Crenshaw
Subject: RE: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

Wednesday, July 12, 2:300 will work for me.

I shall be glad to review your website --
www.weathereffects.com. I shall invite some
people who work on electricity in
my group to join me.

Vince

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/29/2000 03:53:40 PM

Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>

To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject:  RE: Next visit to Houston

Vince,

Good to hear from you and I'm glad you're available. How is Wednesday at
2:30?

I did look at EOL and am not surprised to see its quality. I was unable to
say much about it in my Risk Electricity Hedging and Trading report because
of deadline pressures. How is the site doing? I am intrigued by the
competition for trading platforms and was astonished to hear that Goldman,
Morgan, BP and Shell were going to launch a site to compete with yours. Talk
about a shotgun marriage!

If we have time next week, I could step you through our website --
www.weathereffects.com. I'm very proud of what we've done. I can't give out
a password yet but would be happy to walk through the site with you over the
phone using my password. It's a very ambitious site -- with state-of-the-art
WSI weather (seasonal, 6-10, and day to day) driving a good load model for
PJM and NEPOOL. ESAI contributes oil and gas input price forecasts, capacity
judgments, and "herding" ideas to develop power price forecasts for same
time periods. After one month's full-bore effort, I'm pleased with the
results (e.g., we forecast Nepool onpeak to be $43 and it turned out $46).

Have a great weekend.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:29 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Shirley Crenshaw
Subject: Re: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

I shall be available on both days. What about Wednesday,
July 12, between 1:30 and 4:00. Please, let me know
what time would work for you.

It will be nice to see you again.

Vince

P.S. By the way, did you have a chance to take a look at the EOL?

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/28/2000 02:49:41 PM

Please respond to ekrapels@esaibos.com

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Next visit to Houston

Dear Vince,

I will be returning to Houston during the  week of July 10.

ESAI and Weather Services International have launched -- after more than 18
months of R&D --  our service, called Energycast Power Trader and Energycast
Gas Trader, for power traders in Nepool and PJM. I would be happy to review
the service with you as well as take you on a tour of our web site. Are you
available on July 12 - 13?

Sincerely,

Ed Krapels


Enron CEO Steve Cooper's voicemail transcripts are now available on the Enron intranet at:  http://home.enron.com/updates/ including his Friday, February 22, 2002 voicemail.

In case you have missed a previous message, the transcripts for his voicemails on January 29, February 8, and February 14 are included, as well.


Attached is the weekly file for TW.   Transport margins decreased due to the
maintenance outages.  Operations revised volumes to California to be lower
than last week's estimate.

Please call if you have any questions (53858).


Note: Brian Petty forwarded this to me on 11/17/00 and I thought it would be
of interest.

Joe Hillings

 - COPPSS~1.TXT


I don't know if you are in the loop on this one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:27
PM ---------------------------

	Don Hammond @ ECT

	10/11/2000

To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton

Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041303.txt


Jeff,
Do you really think California is having an energy "crisis," or do you think
PG&E is just trying to gouge its customers?  Any light you can shine on this
matter would be appreciated.  I need some facts to back up my usual ranting
and raving on the subject.

Thanks,
Cristina

(Merry Christmas, by the way)

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041509.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Hi Nancy,

Lisa Mellencamp's time is being consumed by a special project, so I'm working
on this PPA.  Could you give me a call at your convenience?

Thanks,

Kay Mann
713 345 7566


i can get you on that team if you can get that girl to play.  i guess they
need girls on the team


fine by me, rick


that would be great. thanks

bob


Steve,

The last cash flow you sent on Aug 20, 2001 showed we would spend $41.5 million on the Red Rock Expansion in 2001. This cash flow shows $30 million to be spent in 2001. We will be include the difference of $ 72 million and 2001 forecast in the 2002 Capital Plan as a carryover. Please confirm the 2001 cash flow.

Palu

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Goradia, Pallavi
Subject:	FW: TW Red Rock Cashflow

How does this fit in with our 2002 Capital Plan?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kleb, Steve
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Moore, Jan
Cc:	Studzinski, Betty
Subject:	FW: TW Red Rock Cashflow

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kalmus, Steve
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Kleb, Steve
Cc:	Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Hubbard, Dave
Subject:	TW Red Rock Cashflow

Steve,

Here is my updated cashflow for the TW Red Rock project.  Please use this for your year end projections.

Thanks,
Steve Kalmus

 << File: TW Red Rock Cashflow updated thru Sept. 14.xls >>


There is a position available in Deal Control, reporting to Jeff Richter on
the Short-Term California desk.  If you are interested in applying, please
contact Amy FitzPatrick by close of business Friday, May 4, 2001.

Following is a summary of the responsibilities associated with this position.

Facilitate the entry of West Power deals, including short-term and long-term
desks and the services desk, into the trading systems.
Follow-up with Deal Clearing and Settlements groups in Houston to verify
accuracy of trades in the system.  This includes timely follow-up  with the
traders for clarification.
Ensure that all trades are entered by a daily deadline.
Calculate and report weighted averages of daily price and volume to Dow Jones.
Prepare and distribute daily reports to ensure all books are balanced and
report discrepancies to management.
Track and report daily and monthly error discrepancies to management and
deliver reports for possible solutions to rectify errors.
Calculate weighted averages between brokered trades and trades executed
through Enron OnLine and the Intercontinental Exchange.
Report any technical mishaps to appropriate personnel in Houston and track
computer problems until demonstrated resolutions.
Test any updated versions of applications requested by programmers and report
back any adjustments needed.

Additional attributes one must possess to succeed in this position are
persistence and a positive attitude.  Working knowledge of Microsoft Excel is
essential, as is a general software aptitude.

If you have any questions regarding this role, please see either Jeff or Amy.


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024608&Page=
MyReq.


Here is the deal.


Rob,
Look at the conforming languange in the Appendix "A" last page, last
paragraph.  You know that this language was negotiated by and between
SoCalGas and Edison.  My main concern is that its very, very open ended...
almost a contingent liability for all settlement parties.

Jeff


What would we have to do to get rid of the Demarc deal approval requirement
(requiring President level approval for all Demarc delivery deals)? Can Danny
revoke the policy, just like Bill created it?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/25/2001
09:49 PM ---------------------------

Drew Fossum
01/25/2001 08:00 AM
To: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Request 39833, EOL Deal

As long as Dave and/or you are signing off on the EOL packages, I don't have
any problem with this.  As to non-EOL deals, we may also want to eliminate
the requirement that all Demarc deals need such a high approval level.  I
don't think there is anything uniquely risky about Demarc as long as we have
our capacity posting squared away.  DF

Danny McCarty
01/24/2001 12:26 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Request 39833, EOL Deal

Drew,
        Placement of a demarc delivery package on EOL necessarily means it
was approved.  An after the fact note from Linda will suffice.

Dan
---------------------- Forwarded by Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron on 01/24/2001
12:25 PM ---------------------------

Linda Trevino
01/24/2001 08:48 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Request 39833, EOL Deal

Tenaska Marketing Ventures accepted a package on EOL yesterday that delivers
to demarc.  Although EOL deals are pre-approved the CMS system is coded to
route demarc deals to the president level.  In order to expedite the
activation of this request and since it was a pre-approved EOL deal, I
approved the route for each of you in CMS per a request from marketing.

Please let me know if this process will not be agreeable on future EOL deals
that include demarc.

Thanks

Linda


JUST A REMINDER - DON'T FORGET TO BRING  YOUR DESSERT GOODIES ON WHATEVER
DAY YOU SIGNED UP FOR!!

THANK YOU!

RENEE
X-34866!


-----Original Message-----
From: Giron, Darron C.
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

-----Original Message-----
From: Loibl, Kori
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Giron, Darron C.
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

-----Original Message-----
From: Bailey, Derek
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:20 AM
To: McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Loibl, Kori; Olney, Matthew; Jones, Brad; Cavazos, Amy; Vargas, Laura; Taylor, Joey; Thibaut, Dan; Couch, Greg
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

Brutal
-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:06 PM
To: Mulvany, Patrick; Hunter, Larry Joe; Bailey, Derek; Meredith, Kevin
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

Yikes.

  <http://ste.clickability.com/ste.gif?151|5180|4170|989|989|989|2577025|N|2|>
  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>
 	 Texas Monthly <http://www.texasmonthly.com>	   <http://images.clickability.com/logos/cc0000/emailthis-logo.gif>

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 You have received the following link from craig.buehler@enron.com:

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 Click the following to access the sent link:

 	   <http://images.clickability.com/partners/989/etIcon.gif>Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1882864300>

 	 SAVE THIS link <http://texasmonthly.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=989&etMailToID=1882864300>	 FORWARD THIS link <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=1882864300&partnerID=989>

Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.

Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any Web site.	  <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons>

	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>


While recent events have dramatically impacted Enron's travel volume,
Alliance Worldwide (formerly Travel Agency in the Park) wanted to contact
you regarding the Enron Travel Program.  Since 1984, our company has been a
strategic business partner with Enron and has provided a complete scope of
services from booking, ticketing, ticket delivery, customer service,
reporting, management of ClickTrip, to facilitating preferred vendor
arrangements with airlines to benefit Enron.    These services have been
provided on a management fee basis from Alliance to Enron.  As of December
1, 2001 the management fee has been suspended during Enron's period of
reorganization.  We are continuing to provide the turnkey travel services to
Enron and forego the management fee and simply charge a time of ticketing
fee per ticket.

To provide you with a brief history of our arrangement, Enron and Alliance
approached the airlines a couple years ago and negotiated deep upfront
discounts for Enron's business travel.  These discounts are available only
through Alliance and are given at time of ticketing.  All commissions were
stripped from the price of the discounted ticket and returned to Enron, in
exchange for Enron paying Alliance a contracted management fee.  This
management fee was paid monthly and allocated back to each Enron cost center
based on the total number of transactions.  This travel program provided
Enron over $8.6 million in airline savings on $55 million spent in the year
2000 and over $5.2 million on $33 million spent for the first 3 quarters of
2001.  These savings are after the payment of the travel agency management
fee.

The effect that the reduced travel volume will have on discounts provided by
the airlines cannot yet be determined.  We have contacted the airline
companies and most of Enron's preferred carriers have agreed to extend the
contracts through April 2002.  You may utilize these discounts through
Alliance by calling 713 650-8080 or 1 800 962-0248.  In March, Enron and
Alliance will begin evaluating Enron's volume and travel patterns, and
determine any changes that are to be made to the discounts or fee structure.

As mentioned earlier, Alliance is implementing a time of ticketing fee in
lieu of a management fee.  These fees are reimbursable to Enron employees
through normal expense report procedures.  Specifically, the new fee
structure is based on zero-commission contracts for tickets purchased from
Enron's preferred carriers.  The fee schedule for all airline tickets for
Enron travel is as follows:

$30 - Domestic tickets with or without upfront discount
$30 - International tickets without upfront discount
25% of Savings, capped at $175 - International tickets with upfront discount
$15 - Southwest Airlines and ClickTrip Reservations, Hotel/Car Only Bookings

The savings to Enron on a per ticket basis more than covers the nominal fees
that are charged.  For example, Enron's average ticket prices are $589
domestic and $2207 international (after discounts). Enron's average savings
are $144 domestic and $587 international (before fees).  The savings are
more than three times the per ticket fee!

If you are accustomed to booking your own travel online, you may continue to
do so by booking through ClickTrip.  ClickTrip is the only online booking
tool that allows access to Enron's negotiated discounts.  Ticketing through
ClickTrip also bears a smaller fee of $15 if no agent assistance is
necessary.  There is no charge to look at schedules.   ClickTrip is
available 24 hours a day and may be accessed through Enron's intranet site
<http://travel.enron.com> or via the Internet site
<http://www.resassist.com/enron/>.  ClickTrip is also a useful tool for
checking flight schedules or for checking upgrade status.  To check upgrade
status or to review a ticketed itinerary, simply click the Check My Trip
button on the ClickTrip home page and fill in your name and Amadeus locator
number (provided at the top of your itinerary).  A user log-in may be
obtained by contacting Alliance at 713 328-5100.

If your office location, phone number or any profile information has
changed, please notify us by return email.  A profile form is attached if
you prefer to fax the information to Alliance at 713 328-5600 or if you are
a new traveler wishing to set up a profile.

We at Alliance are proud of our 17 year association with Enron and dedicated
to ensuring you of the best possible service at the most economical price
for all of your travel needs.  We have a highly trained and experienced
staff working on Enron's account and we look forward to providing you with
continued service for years to come.
If you have any questions regarding any of the changes mentioned, or wish to
discuss specific details relating to your corporate travel policies, please
call me 713 328-5139, or email lhinson@allianceworldwide.com
<mailto:lhinson@allianceworldwide.com>.

Sincerely,
Lee Ann Hinson
Director
Account Management
713 328-5139
lhinson@allianceworldwide.com <mailto:lhinson@allianceworldwide.com>

 <<>>


John Sherriff's asst has moved the meeting.  I hope this is still possible
for you.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 09/11/2000
08:05 ---------------------------

Lauren Urquhart
07/11/2000 09:16
To: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Thursday instead Friday

Hi Steve

Steve, the research meeting has been moved to Thursday at 3.00pm.

Can you please let Vince know.

Thanks.

Lauren


Angela, if in your view, the issues brought up by Chase are an underlying dissatisfaction with the "entire" agreement, particularily the commodity "savings and advice" component, perhaps it would be advantageous for both Enron and Chase to sit down and re-negotiate.  From our point of view, given the execution and contract issues we currently have with the contract, this may be a win-win for the companies.  Let's sit down and discuss strategy - if you think it would be advantageous, I will replace Tom as senior level contact.

As per my voice mail from this weekend, I would like to get ahead of the potential issues brewing at a number of the other accounts particularily Starwood.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 08:17 AM ---------------------------

Chris Holmes
04/27/2001 06:48 PM
To:	Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Dag Joraholmen/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: Chase Marc Shapiro call to Jeff Skilling

Dag talked very briefly to  Manny prior to my getting your email--Dag will not talk to him again until you and Dag talk.

Manny told Dag that Chase wants all the holes filled in their  year 2000 data base-- Manny seemed to be at  a a loss to explain in more detail exactly what is bothering Chase.

I agree with your perception that Chase feels they are not getting financial and construction value; they also feel there was other  value promised them -- such as , in Manny's words, " strategic commodity management" , i.e.,  insights into, and advice on,  how to respond to changes in the commodity market.

Chris

Angela Schwarz
04/27/2001 06:15 PM
To:	Chris Holmes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Dag Joraholmen/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: Chase Marc Shapiro call to Jeff Skilling

I am requesting that Dag hold off on contacting Manny until Dag and I have met.  I know that we were scheduled to meet  on Tuesday to discuss these very issues but I can move this up to Monday morning.

 Dag and Cindy have dramatically improved the quality of our billing efforts but the basic contract structure precludes us from ever achieving  customer satisfaction (perfection).

 I really believe the underlying issue here is that Chase perceives they are not receiving the financial value they had anticipated from the commodity and construction agreements.  We presented a report to them last week that would support their position.  The lack of value created coupled with the  billing issues and a vacancy in senior sponsorship seems to have created the tension that ultimately could put us in a good position to re-negotiate this deal.

 We have identified several areas of contract restructure that will create immediate value for Chase and Enron, eliminate the billing issues and provide them the visibility into the financial performance of the agreement they have been requesting.

Jeremy has a strong relationship with Mark Shapiro and should be leveraged here.  We need to make sure our response to Mark maximizes the opportunity to get everybody back to the table.

I am going to the esource conference nex t week with Manny Patino, where he is presenting .  The main reason I am going is  damage control as many of our competitors  will be there and it is my intention to stay close to Manny. (a great heads up from Peggy).

ams

Chris Holmes
04/27/2001 05:42 PM
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Dag Joraholmen/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Chase Marc Shapiro call to Jeff Skilling

Jeff Skilling called me this afternoon to say that he received a call from Chase Vice Chairman Marc Shapiro. Shapiro said that Chase was upset about:

1. Tom White and Gary Provo no longer being involved with the Chase account

2. Billing errors (unspecified problems)

I explained to Jeff that:

1. Chase wants someone at the Tom White level to continue to be their senior contact; Jeff said that that Dave might want to perform that function

2. We have made major improvements with the billing but we have not reached perfection; perfection is what Chase wants.

Next Steps:

1. We will have to let Chase know who will be their Tom White level contact.

2. Dag Joraholmen will contact Manny Patino at Chase to get specifics on the billing issues and with Evan's team determine what can be done to address such specifics.

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Hi, Matthew, sorry for the late response but I am the right person for
receipt of your inquiry.
Please advise what products we will trade.  Thanks very much.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Matthew.Flett@morganstanley.com
	04/10/2001 06:24 AM
	Please respond to Matthew.Flett

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
		 cc: Jason Pugh <Jason.Pugh@morganstanley.com>, Christopher Mitchell
<Christopher.Mitchell@morganstanley.com>
		 Subject: ISDA Master between MSCS and Enron Nth America

Dear Sara,

I now attach a draft schedule to an ISDA Master Agreement between Morgan
Stanley Capital Services Inc. and Enron North America Corp. I would be
grateful if you could review the revised draft and revert with any
comments that you may have. I will also be forwarding you a draft Credit
Support Annex for your review in due course.

I would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email and
confirm that you are the appropriate contact at Enron North America to
negotiate this ISDA.

Do not hesitate to contact me with any queries that you may have.

Regards,
Matthew Flett

 - 1_0211934.01


Dave-

There are several little features that EOL traders such as myself would like
to see on the website and stack manager.  I realize that there may be bigger
issues being worked on currently, but would it be possible for EOL to survey
Enron traders as well as outside traders on suggestions for enhancements??
For example, I'd like to be able to sort completed trades by date on stack
manager.  Also, it would be nice if we could have a shading feature on the
website, so people could shade products different colors.  This might cut
down on trades made in error.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


Gerald:  Attached in red-line format are my suggested additions to your
letter.

Craig Carver

 <<Drft 2 Wildhorse1.doc>>

 - Drft 2 Wildhorse1.doc


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Global Markets
In a combined effort, Global Risk Markets (GRM), a unit of Enron Global
Markets, and Southeast Power Origination, part of Enron Americas, closed
Enron's first Contingent Call Outage Option in the 1st quarter 2001. The
product was created to provide customers with a cost effective risk
management tool to hedge against high commodity prices after experiencing an
unplanned power generation outage.

The transaction was entered into with UtiliCorp United to manage its
generation risk for summer 2001. This risk is associated with a forced outage
of their largest coal unit during peak summer demand. The transaction, which
was developed jointly with the Southeast Power group, highlights the benefits
of cooperation between business units within Enron. GRM is working with a
number of business units to integrate this risk management product into other
Enron businesses to enhance value to our customers.  For additional
information on the product, please call David Hoog in the New York office at
212 702 3920.

IN THE NEWS

WORTH Magazine Names the Top 50 CEO's
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 23, 2001--Fifty of the country's chief
executive officers have been chosen by WORTH magazine as the top business
leaders in the nation, it was announced by W. Randall Jones, CEO, Worth
Media.
The third annual listing of CEO's by WORTH is determined based on each
leaders "foresight, judgment, and competitive juice to make their investors
happy." Rounding out the top 5 are the following best leaders:
1. Steve Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft   2. Jeffrey Skilling, CEO, Enron   3.
Philip Purcell, CEO, Morgan Stanley   4. James Morgan, CEO, Applied
Materials
5. Margaret Whitman, CEO, eBay
"We selected this year's list based on our belief in the CEO's ability to
deliver long-term shareholder value," said Jones. "The real test is not to
recognize past achievements but to be able to look back in five or ten years
from now. As a matter of fact, some CEO's we've chosen haven't made money for
share holders in the past few years, but we believe they are poised to do so
now."  WORTH's methodology for selecting the 50 best CEO's strives to balance
their possession of a vision with a demonstrated ability to execute under
stress and when confronted by urgent challenges.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM  - Chrishelle Berell, Paul Murray, Yong Yi
EIM   - Jeff Nutt
ENA  - Keegan Farrell

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - Joe Parks, Mike Purcell
EGM ) Samuel Enochian

NUGGETS & NOTES

Travel Tip of the Week:  Book non-refundable tickets. Airlines typically
allow unused non-refundable tickets to be applied towards subsequent travel.
Even if you need to make a change at a rate of $100, in many cases the change
fee plus the ticket price is still less than a refundable ticket.
 For example:  Houston to Washington, D.C.
      Refundable:  $ 1,447
      Non-refundable       $    540

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.


Attached is Kevin and my suggestions to TVA's changes we received Friday
late.  We are supposed to call Steve Whitley Monday am.  Call me with
comments.   Use LAUNCH to see the redlines (TVA) and bluelines (enron).


Lee,

Here is the Agave I/C agreement.  I made a few changes.  Please review:

Para 1:  Agave....a New Mexico corporation...
Article 2.1:  term of ...five (5) years
Article 3.3:  New paragraph.  Please wordsmith as necessary.  Also, notice the weird indentation on 3.1 and 3.2.  Can you help this?
Article 8.5:  filled in detail on Agave contacts as per their request.

Let me know.  Thanks, Kim.


I realize the group may go a different way with this, but I remain convinced
that we should go to a pure number system (ie a pure relative ranking) and
use the behaviors and skills descriptions as a way of discussing the
differences between people.  Just adding the qualifier "relative to peers"
glosses over what's really going on.  The behavior and skill descriptors tell
everyone what is valued here and guide the discussion.  The relative ranking
lets us have the flexibility to meet business needs by getting tighter or
"looser" on performance rankings, terminations, and comp.

	Gina Corteselli
	10/16/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: PRC Cluster Descriptors

Steve,

We have revised the PRC Cluster descriptors again, in an attempt to include
"relativity" into the language.  Likewise,  for consistency we opted  not to
change them too drastically at the year end.  Instead we will look at making
other changes (for example, reducing the number of clusters from 6 to 5
and/or changing the wording)  at the mid-year 2001.

The VP PRC Committee had a chance to look at the revised clusters at last
week's meeting.  However, I apologize that I did not send them to you in
advance of that meeting.

Cindy has asked me to send them to the Executive Committee after you have had
a chance to review them.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks in advance,

Gina Corteselli


Do we have to wait for Board resolutions (December BOD mtg) to have Rick start signing, or can they be retroactive ie. ratifying what he's signed if he starts immediately.  I'd think we could do the latter, as that's what you had to do for me.

Cassandra.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lowry, Donna
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:40 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Carson, Rick L.; Schultz, Cassandra; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: Signing Authority

I think so.  It makes sense for Rick to sign on these accounts.  I will be talking to Tom Doukas in the next day to get him focused on his accounts that need to be updated for Enron Credit Inc.  Thanks .Donna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Lowry, Donna
Cc:	Carson, Rick L.; Schultz, Cassandra; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Signing Authority

Donna:

I checked the corporate database and Rick is a Vice President of RAC.  Do we want to prepare new board resolutions authorizing him as a second signatory on the brokerage agreements for ENA, ECT Investments and Enron Credit Inc.?

Marie


We are injecting gas into EGAN storage today through Monday, off of Texas Gas
and CGLF.  We will be withdrawing this gas ratably in Dec into Texas Gas.  I
will probably make a mistake or two on my deals because I'm kinda sleepy.

Crystal will help me set up the deals on EGAN.  I am currently using a CPR
Storage deal ticket and I believe that is incorrect.  I will let everyone
know the deal tickets by the end of the day.


Attached please find the EPMI Power Credit Watch List as of 02/05/01.  Please
direct any questions and/or comments to the Credit Hotline (713-853-1803).

Thank you,
Veronica Gonzalez


I don't think there are any Central Desk changes.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:44
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 09:18:43 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
09:25 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/28/99 09:05 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Marianne
Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

Good Morning.  As per my conversation with Noel this morning, he will be
getting back to be whether CG&E will be served off ANR or TGT.  I have space
of
2000 dth at Springboro as per CG&E.

I have my PECO numbers listed below in purple.

ANR
 CG&E- deliveries to Springboro 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 30th - note this can be served off TGT

Tetco
 BUG  145 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 Con Ed 261 dth/day  (estimate ONLY) LDC Nom Deadline is 2
pm on the 30th
 PECO  1006 dth/day Monday - Friday and 452 dth/day
Saturday and Sunday LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 30th
 PECO-PAGas  250 dth/day Monday - Friday and 230 dth/day Saturday and
Sunday
 PSEG  1696 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 29th
 Etown  23 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
 NJN  7528 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est on
the 30th

CNG - PA gas for PECO /day  (If we have a problem flowing this much,
please let me know as soon as possible so we can buy delivered gas to PECO's
gate from one of the other suppliers)

Transco
 LILCO  382 dth/day    (capacity release is also for
382) LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 27th
 PSEG  189 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the
29th
 S Jersey  113 dth/day Transco nom must show Enduser # 012224 to
be confirmed- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the 30th
 Piedmont 1113 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline was 10:30 est on
the 22nd - just need activity number now
 PSNC  190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC)
   The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)

Texas Gas
 DP&L  1298 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 est on the 30th
 CG&E  1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 30th - note this can be served off TGT