Bob:

We are working on a "protocol" re electronic signatures.  Is this something
isda would want to be involved in?  Maybe money could be made.  Let me know.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 12:39 PM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	06/27/2000 05:31 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: E-Signature Protocol

Mark:

Pursuant to our discussion last week, below is a rough draft of a proposal
for an electronic signature protocol, which could be presented to ISDA for
further consideration and discussion after we have further discussed:

E-Signature Protocol

Objective: In light of the enactment of the US federal legislation on
electronic signatures (effective as of 10/1/00), a simple, reliable, and
enforceable protocol should be established to facilitate the electronic
execution of Master Agreements (and confirmations where required).  To
facilitate the wider use of electronic contracts, this protocol could be
endorsed by ISDA. Hopefully, it would become a standard that others would use
for all types of contracts. Perhaps, if necessary or helpful, the adoption of
the protocol could be done electronically by each party unilaterally agreeing
to abide by it, possibly using the same type of approach ISDA used in
connection with the introduction of the EMU currency a few years ago.
Initially, the protocol would be primarily applicable to U.S. counterparties,
but it could be expanded to non-U.S. counterparties as e-signature laws like
the new U.S. law are enacted across the globe.

Basic Protocol:  By adopting the protocol, each counterparty would agree that
the relevant agreement may be electronically signed by complying with the
following steps:

1) The parties negotiate and agree on a final form the relevant agreement,
and appoint one of the parties ("First Party") to prepare the document for
electronic signature;

2) The First Party prepares the final form in the PDF format (e.g., the body
of the text could not be modified) with the exception of the blank signature
blocks for each party to be placed on the last page of the agreement;

3) An authorized signatory of the First Party electronically signs the
agreement (Note: this electronic signature could be accomplished by
inscribing an electronic handwritten signature or the signatory typing in
his/her name and title in the blank signature block);

4) The agreement, as electronically signed by the First Party, is sent via
electronic means (e.g., by e-mail) by the First Party to the other party
("Second Party");

5) An authorized signatory of the Second Party  electronically signs the
agreement (Note: this electronic signature could be accomplished by
impressing an electronic handwritten signature or the signatory typing in
his/her name and title in the signature block);

6) The agreement, as electronically signed by the Second Party, is sent via
electronic means (e.g., by e-mail) by the Second Party to the First Party,
accordingly, creating the fully executed agreement; and

7) Each party would be responsible for maintaining in its own electronic
archives the agreement as electronically signed by the parties.

Also, the following could be considered: (a) adding to the protocol that each
party,by adopting the protocol, agrees to be bound by any agreement entered
into by means of the protocol, and any other appropriate language to enhance
the enforceability of the "e-signature" process and (b) adding to the
preprinted form of the Master Agreement, a provision whereby each party
adopts the electronic signature protocol endorsed by ISDA as in effect from
time to time.

Mark, I would be happy to discuss this draft proposal with you further at
your convenience.

Regards, Alan


Fred has asked that we prepare an ISDA between ENA and Northern Border
Partners, L.P., which is also a wholly owned Enron subsidiary.  Should we
prepare an RMA or regular ISDA?  I have provided a worksheet that contains
Enron's ownership structure and little else.  Let me know if I should provide
another worksheet with more detail.

thanks
brant


Steve:
We are okay with you being the confirming party.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


eat my shorts

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 05:01 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

3:1 and your on
Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

the implied market on that from put spreads is 5.3:1.    I'll take 4:1.
that's all the juice i'll pay.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 07:59 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

Most import  - the wager - I will take the over on May NG (4.95). 2:1 is
okay--- $5 per penny okay?

Agree - Products
Rally is not different for products. 92% of heating oil is made ondemand
(storage is not as important as in nat gas) Heat will get ugly this October
and then give it up (unless we have 7 blizzzards in the Northeast very
early).
SOme things to consider :
1- in the next 3-4 weeks we will finish the very heavy maintenance season and
be in full blown gasoline season.
- yields will be preferentially shifted for HU
3- nobody will pay any attention to HO
2-HO will have incremental demand due to utlity switching and will quietly
build slower than last year
4- therefore by September everyone will freak out
5- After the OCtober contract expires (HO) , everyone will realize (similar
to NG) that the world will not end.

Where does this get us:
1- Sell q3 HU crack and by Q4HO crack (By the time q3 prices out--the wind
will have been taken out of HU sails - plus you can do it month
avg--therefore less noise)
2-Benefit from heat's recent excitement -- sell HO calls (June -Aug), buy ng
puts nov-jan

Ng-Disagree:
I think prices stay high through June. The big drop off come some where in
July 15 to Aug 15 and downhill from there. (Looks like 1998)

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:41 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re: ng views

the only change that's happened to my long term outlook has been that the
weather in the short term has been more bullish and we'll have 30 or so bcf
less storage than i was anticpating in two weeks.  so yea, my curve is a
touch higher, but it doesnt change my longer term view.  most of the move
this week was a short sqeeze of spec shorts combined with a strong heat
market.  a little concerned about heat, but also saw products very strong
going into the season this past winter only to stage a huge failure.  not
convinced this rally in products is different.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:04 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ng views

where's your curve now?
MAy
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan 02

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759


Vince,

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/19/2001 05:12 PM ---------------------------

From the Enron India Newsdesk- Jan 18th newsclips

Untie Them (Editorial)
Thursday Jan 18 2001, http://www.economictimes.com/today/18edit02.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

State not to give tax sops to DPC for buying naphtha from IOC, (Sanjay Jog)
 Thursday Jan 18
2001,http://financialexpress.com/fe/daily/20010118/fec18056.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

Centre yet to receive proposal on Enron
Thursday Jan 18 2001, http://www.economictimes.com/today/18infr02.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

Untie Them (Editorial)
Thursday Jan 18 2001

THE GOVERNMENT of Maharashtra wants New Delhi to convince the Power Trading
Corporation, a central utility, to buy power from Dabhol and sell it across
the country.It would be far simpler if Dabhol  and all independent power
producers  were allowed to sell power to whoever was willing to pay for
it.That, unfortunately, is not allowed by law, which forces private sector
generators to sell power only to state utilities, which in turn, are not
permitted to sell power across states on their own.

Most state electricity boards are bankrupt . MSEB reportedly owes central
utilities Rs 5,000 crore. They cannot bring themselves to charge many types
of users for the power consumed, nor can they prevent large-scale theft of
electricity. Few, including wealthy Maharashtra, have the will to reform
state electricity boards and privatise transmission and distribution. Given
this profile of buyers, private generators demand sovereign guarantees to
help them tide over default risks. But the guarantees merely insulate IPPs
against risk. They cannot make SEBs solvent. Yet, India needs power
desperately. Maharashtra, India,s richest state, experiences power shortages
of around 2,000 MW, about a sixth of its peak needs.

Over time, the hunger for power will only grow. India cannot afford to wait
for the painful politics of SEB reform to work themselves out. The government
should bring in legislation that allows IPPs to sell power directly to paying
customers.This will free IPPs from the clutches of bankrupt monopsony buyers.
The power trading legislation will have unexpectedly happy consequences for
the government too.Once IPPs are freed from their onerous obligations to sell
power to single, mostly bankrupt buyers, their default risks will come down
substantially. New Delhi and state governments should then scrap the
guarantees that they gave IPPs in the past.
The combination of power trading, private investments in generation,
transmission and distribution, and gradual SEB reform  will create a
commercial, workable and competitive power market in India. Anything less
will be a recipe for disaster.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

State not to give tax sops to DPC for buying naphtha from IOC, (Sanjay Jog)
 Thursday Jan 18 2001

The Maharshtra government's finance department, which is striving to reduce
fiscal deficit from Rs 9,484 crore to Rs 3,484 crore by the beginning of
April this year, has expressed its inability to provide a sales tax waiver to
the Dabhol Power Company (DPC) on the procurement of 1.2 million tonne of
naphtha from the state-run Indian Oil Corporation (IOC).

Mantralaya sources told The Financial Express on Wednesday that DPC would
have to pay 4 per cent sales tax. "The government, way back in 1995, has
modified the sales tax rate to 4 per cent to discourage the import of naphtha
from Gujarat by electrical companies operating in Maharashtra. The decision
was taken with a view to encouraging electrical companies to procure naphtha
at reduced rates within the state," government sources added. Sources said
that these companies had to pay nearly 15.3 per cent sales tax on naphtha
that was procured from Gujarat. However, following their representation, the
government slashed the sales tax rate to 4 per cent.

The state finance department's opinion, which would be presented before the
state cabinet shortly in order to take a final decision, deserves special
significance especially when the state energy department and the loss-making
Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) have wholeheartedly supported the
DPC's cause and recommended the sales tax waiver. DPC, which was asked by the
Union ministry of oil and petroleum to procure naphtha within the country in
view of excess availability, in its presentation to the state government and
to MSEB, had made it clear that it would be left with no alternative but to
pass on the additional burden on the MSEB which would be ultimately passed on
to its consumers. DPC had also told the state government that it had not paid
sales tax on the procurement of naphtha from Glencore in the calender year
2000.

Sources from the state energy department and MSEB have stressed on the need
for such a waiver while expressing their inability to bear additional burden.
They have suggested that the state should reciprocate by offering a sales tax
exemption to DPC because the IOC, at the behest of the Centre, has tried to
match the international landing price of naphtha during the recently signed
memorandum of agreement with DPC. "If the state finance department sticks to
its views, it may hurt the state as a whole," sources from the state energy
department and MSEB said.DPC will procure naphtha at Rs 11,050 per ton from
IOC during the calender year 2001 as compared to the Rs 10,050 per tonne
price quoted by Glencore. The naphtha price comprises $175 per tonne free on
board (FOB), 21.8 per cent of customs duty, 5.4 per cent of sales tax and
$18.87 of premium.

DPC senior vice president Mukesh Tyagi reiterated that the company has
already made an appeal to the state government for the sales tax waiver on
naphtha in the larger interest of the consumers. "Sales tax is a pass through
and MSEB, which will have to bear the additional burden, will pass it on the
consumers," he added.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

Centre yet to receive proposal on Enron
Thursday Jan 18 2001

CENTRE on Wednesday said that it had not recevied any proposal from
Maharashtra government seeking help to solve the tangle with the Enron
promoted Dhabol Power Project relating to cost and surplus power. Asked about
the reports that Maharashtra government was sending a proposal that centre
buy surplus power from Dhabol Power Company through power trading
corporation, power minister Suresh Prabhu said "we have not received any
proposal." "We are carefully watching the situation and will await a concrete
proposal before intervening in this matter," Parbhu said on the sidelines of
greentech environment excellence awards ceremony, here. Asked whether there
was any possibility of the government asking the Power Trading Corporation to
buy power from the Dhabol Power Corporation, Prabhu replied "what will the
PTC do with the power?"

Prabhu had earlier asked the state government to study the matter before
approaching the centre for payment of dues. MSEB had earlier declined to pick
up its 15 per cent stake in phase II of the 1444 mw project. The Enron issue
has been hanging fire with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board unable to
clear the dues of DPC as a result of the skyrocketing prices of Naphtha
infact MSEB has asked DPC to backdown completely leading to a situation where
DPC has stopped production at the facility from the begining of the
month.State government has stepped in with support to the tune of Rs 114
crore to enable MSEB to clear the dues for October. MSEB dues to DPC for
November and December amount to over Rs 300 crores.


Hey Frank,
Just a quick note to tell you I am thinking of you.  Let's get together in January when I get back from SLC (I'm here for a month) and do lunch or drinks or something.

Susan


Attached is a list of EES retail issues regarding the matters we discussed
yesterday.  We are beginning to track down answers to these issues, and we
look forward to coordinating our efforts.  MDS


Sara,

I have updated the Southern Cone Schedule and attach a copy hereto.

Sara Shackleton
08/26/99 09:32 AM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Southern Cone Financial Master Agreements

We can add TGS to this list and remind me on Monday to review.  Thanks.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/26/99 09:24
AM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
08/25/99 10:48 AM
To: Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Southern Cone Financial Master Agreements

Attached is the first report identifying financial master trading agreements
generated by ECT's derivatives legal group.  This report will be updated and
distributed weekly.  It only reflects documentation originated by Houston's
legal department and the status of negotiations.  If you have any questions,
please call me at 713/853-5620 or e-mail.  Thanks.  Sara


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

August 31, 2001 5:00pm through September 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 9/1/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 9/1/2001 at      1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 8/31/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 8/31/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 9/1/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London thru Sat 9/1/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Increase bandwidth on the network core
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: When users are moved to the new building the traffic on the core will increase significantly.
Backout: revert back to the one link
Contact(s): 	Christopher M Ducker  713-345-8241

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Portland
Time:  Fri 8/31/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 8/31/2001 at  7:15:00 PM CT
	Fri 8/31/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 8/31/2001 at  5:15:00 PM PT
	Sat 9/1/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 9/1/2001 at  1:15:00 AM London
Outage:  EBS Links to homes in Portland to be disconnected (Tom Duff and Barry Lavine)
Environments Impacted:  Portland
Purpose: cost
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Robert Humlicek    713-853-6366

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Give a read and then a call to discuss the notice and the timing of the
purchase.  Thanks, Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 12:03
PM ---------------------------

KWiemer@milbank.com on 12/22/2000 06:19:11 AM
To: lisa.bills@enron.com
cc: jonathan.cody@csfb.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, mmckay@velaw.com,
LHarris@milbank.com, DMichalchuk@milbank.com, KWiemer@milbank.com

Subject: E-Next Gen/Purchase of Property

Lisa - The notice under 6.1(a) of the DCMA for Property to be purchased out
of the facility should specify simply:

1.????? The proposed Applicable Construction Purchase Date (between 5 and 15
Business Days after the date of the notice).? By my count we don't have 5 BDs
left in the year.? If you want to do by year end you will need a waiver.

2.????? The Specified Option Property - which should be described with
sufficient specificity for the Developer to prepare a legally sufficient
quitclaim deed or bill of sale and assignment pursuant to 7.1 of the DCMA,
and the party owning the property (Developer or Developer Subsidiary or
other).? For your purposes now, this should be fairly straightforward - we
will be doing just a Bill of Sale and an assignment.? Serial numbers,
location and any other information for positive identification of any
equipment should suffice, and as to contract rights that is just a reference
to the appropriate contract(s) and the rights to be assigned thereunder (if
not all).? In future, this element will be driven by the type of Property you
are taking out.

3.????? Designate the amount of Project Costs Attributable to the Specified
Option Property.? Note that this works hand in hand with the voluntary
prepayment section under the PA, Section 2.1G for Phase I.? I assume you're
in LIBOR right now, so you need to give a minimum 3 B.D. notice of
prepayment, and it is irrevocable. You might as well incorporate the notice
of prepayment into the Purchase Option Exercise Notice.

The Developer will need to produce and deliver a Bill of Sale and an
assignment based on the information you provide, so please copy me on the
information you send to CSFB.?

I have not had an opportunity to discuss this with Jon (generally or about
the waiver issue) or anyone else, so please go ahead and start on the notice
with the knowledge that there may be further comment and a requirement for
further information.? Why don't you produce one version that includes a
request for a waiver of the 5 Business Day requirement and an "acknowledged
and consented to" signature line for CSFB as Admin Agent.? As you suggested
on the phone, it may be worthwhile to produce a form for this kind of
notice.? Let's consider doing that after the first of the year so we can be
sure to anticipate all that must be included. There may be other items we
want to establish a form or precedent for too, depending on what features of
the facility you see Enron using frequently.

Let's speak about this early today, obviously. And we must be sure we have
enough Business Days left in the year to pull this off - LIBOR Business Days
would be the only problem I could imagine, I'm just unable to check that
right now.

Talk to you soon, I'll be in the office by 9 or 9:30.? And why did it take
you so long to get active on this facility? Such a nice credit and you just
let it sit there for days!

Cheers, Karl

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Lavo thinks we should consider Redmond as a good candidate to fill one of the marketing holes that we have in East Power or gas.  Any thoughts?

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


Hi Mary,

Sorry about not getting in touch with you earlier. (Just checked my e-mail)
Unfortunately I will be out of Houston this weekend and will be headed back
to India. Hence i will not be able to meet with you. I am looking into the
commercial aspect of the LNG contracts and hence would like to discuss your
plans. Can we still do this over the phone??

Sorry again, about not getting in touch with you.

Regards,

Anshuman

Mary Solmonson@ECT
06/09/2000 11:59 PM
To: Anshuman Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG Contracts

I would like to visit with you while you are here in Houston.  You may
contact me at x3-6079 and we can arrange a time to meet.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000
01:27 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Hellmann@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

06/09/2000 07:34 PM

To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anshuman Srivastav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: LNG Contracts

Mary,

One of our team members, Anshuman Srivastav, is currently in Houston.  It
would probably be useful for the 2 of you to meet, so that we can understand
exactly what your plans are with regards to LNG and what exactly you will
require as far as contracts go.

Failing that,  the person, who is the official keeper of all our contracts,
is Sandeep Katwala.  He should be able to get you whatever you need.

Let me know if you have any difficulties and I can try and hunt stuff down.

Heidi

Mary Solmonson@ECT
06/08/2000 05:21 PM
To: Rick Phillips/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gautam
Dhar/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heidi
Hellmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Milind
Laad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Love Sharma/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LNG Contracts

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
05:18 PM ---------------------------

Mary Solmonson
06/08/2000 05:19 PM
To:
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: LNG Contracts

I am seeking information on where to find copies of LNG Contracts that were
previously in the domain of the old Enron International company.   Enron
North America will be establishing a risk book to manage LNG positions on a
worldwide basis and we need copies of all contracts to set this up.  These
contracts may or may not be related to the Dabhol project.  If you can
provide guidance or information as to where to find these contracts, I would
appreciate it.  You may respond via email or call me at 713-853-6079 in
Houston.

Thank you for your attention.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 05:30 PM -----

	Mark Taylor
	07/20/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: Andy zipper
		 cc:
		 Subject: Direct Access Disclaimer Language

As I mentioned in my voice-mail, this needs to go somewhere that users might
actually see it - e.g. a news ticker story.  Simply adding it to the Legal &
Privacy Statement, while helpful, is not sufficient.

EnronOnline is conducting a pilot program involving direct access connections
(such as a "T1" line or other means of direct access) to EnronOnline, as an
alternative to internet access.   Direct access connections might enable
users to access EnronOnline more quickly than is currently possible through
internet access.


This is about a trip to Brazil.  She asked me to pay the $6000 in expenses.
Do you see any rationale to pay for this?  Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/08/99 12:40
PM ---------------------------

Monica Jordan
11/08/99 10:34 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: follow up from our meeting 11/05/99

Mark,

 Thanks for looking into the People's to People program for me.    Instead of
asking Cliff for full funding perhaps it would be "better received" to
suggest 50% funding?   If it doesn't look like that would work either, would
it be ok with Enron's policy to go on my own?

 Thanks.  (I hope that I'm not being a nuisance about this Mark, if so, just
say the word and I'll drop it!)

 Monica


Our Sacramento correspondent just exited a news conference from
Gov. Davis, FERC chair Hoecker, DOE Sectretary Richardson and
others outlining several emergency measures, including west-wide
price cap. As soon as her report is filed, we'll be sending it to your
attention. I expect that will be around 2:30 pm.


Sorry about the confusion.  Fran Mayes will be sending a memo out in the next
day or so reflecting the times of the PRC.  In order to accommodate Dave's
meeting with all you and to include Mark Frevert we had to move the time of
the PRC from 8:00 am to 11:00 am.  The ONLY thing changed was the time,
the date and place remain the same.

Again, I am sorry for the confusion and I hope this helps.  If you have any
question, please feel free to call me.

Thanks,

Kay


I need everyone to close out of Lotus Notes and log back in.  Some security
settings have been changed on the server to prevent accidental delection of
e-mail.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

Thanks,
Diana


I apologize, I have been out sick until this afternoon and have not gotten to
it.  I think, if memory serves me correctly, I think I was generally ok with
the language except for the proviso at the end because we do not know what
your internal policies are and how you would evaluate the assignee.  It
basically strips out the right because it still leaves us subject to Enron's
caprice.  Could you perhaps give me a better sense as to what the criteria
would be?

Thanks

Yair Yaish
Director and Senior Counsel
Allegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC
212-236-7955

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:16 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:  Are we finished?  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:42 AM

I hope to leave by 3:30 Eastern Time.  Thanks for getting back to me so
quickly.  Though, I'm surprised u guys are open for business today.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 9:41 AM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

I've left a message with Tracy Ngo (in Portland) and will let you know as
soon as I hear from her.  How long will you be in the office today?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/13/2001
                    08:28 AM

Sara, Allegheny would like to be able to assign to affilaites in the same
manner that we are allowing Enron to make an ssignment so long as the Gty
goes along.  In our case, however, there is no gty, hence the stipualtion
that such assignment must be to an entity with an equal or better credit
rating.  If you wish, I can limit such assignment to an entity rated at
least BBB+ or better.  Would that resolve your concerns?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:26 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

It's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.

(See attached file: AlleghenyCPformacceptR1.DOC)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/12/2001
                    10:16 AM

Sara, sorry i didn't get back to you yesterday, I was out sick.  I didn't
notice anything attached, did u send a subsequent e-mail?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:01 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13
Importance: High

Yair:

Attached is my redline.  Call me so that we can discuss the remaining
issues, including:

(1)  Calculation Agent.  We believe that the existing dispute mechanism is
adequate.

(2)  Procedures for Entering into Transactions.  There is no procedure for
dual confirms.  This is too confusing.

(3)  Transfer.  We cannot agree to your assignment provision as it is too
subjective.

The other changes were not substantive.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/10/2001
                    07:46 AM

Sara, any thoughts on my comments ISDA I sent out last week?

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaish, Yair (OGC)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:19 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, I have good news, I think we are very close to executing this baby.

I am attahcing comments to the ISDA.  They reflect comments by our outside
cousel which highlight the differences between this contract and the side
letter/ML ISDA.  They are not much.  I have also made some changes directly
on their draft where I either concurred with Enron or needed to make some
of my own changes.  Pls review and let me know what you think.

I will be leaving the office soon, so if we can wrap it up tomorrow that
would be great (I'm out Monday for Passover).

Yair Yaish
Director and Senior Counsel
Allegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC
212-236-7346

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:10 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

Attached is a blacklined (against the Enron North America Corp. draft of
3/15/01) Schedule and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  I
have tried to incorporate the essence of the March 19, 2001 "swap side
letter agreement."  Please call me to discuss as it would be nice to
finalize by April 6.  Thanks.

(See attached file: 098a Blackline ctr (Allegheny Energy Supply).doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Abel,

We are staying at the Holiday Hotel and will be arriving in the afternoon on
Thursday, Sept. 7.
 Please book us for Sept. 8 and 9 .  We will plan on talking with you when we
arrive on Sept. 7 about the details.

Thanks,

Scott Neal

Todd.Neal@chron.com on 08/18/2000 03:17:03 PM
To: sneal@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Fishing Trip

Scott,

What do you think?  Should we book him?  Have you found any other options?
Check out the website at www.ambergriscaye.com
<http://www.ambergriscaye.com> .

Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: Tropic Air Ltd. [mailto:tropicair@btl.net]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 8:17 AM
To: Todd.Neal@chron.com
Subject: Fishing Trip

Todd,

I am available for fishing with you on Sept.8. On the 8 Sept. when you
arrive, I will take you to fish and we can discuss what type of deep fishing
you want. It is no problem getting a guide if I can not take you deep
fishing. This is a slow season and a lot of tour guides are available. You
do not need to bring any equipment. We have any kind you need. Are you
staying at Holiday Hotel ? I will speak to you on the day of your arrival.
Hope to see you soon.

Abel Guerrero Esq.


OW,

I have changed the pricing on deal 132975 for this message.  Please adjust
the risk assignment.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

Susan Smith
12/21/2000 02:33 PM
Sent by: Susan Smith
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Kerr McGee-meter 6884-January , 2001

All:
 The following was passed on to me. We received the following information
from Kerr-McGee:

 For the month of January 2001:

 DCQ=26,000 MMbtu/d

 Gas Daily Volume-30% of DCQ=7,800 MMbtud

 Base contract price volume-70% of DCQ=18,200 MMbtud

 Thanks,
 Susan Smith
 x 33321


[IMAGE]

Good  News For Our Customers!	[IMAGE][IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
During  The Month Of December We Pay All Deposit Fees!

Good  Things Come In Threes

1.  As an early Christmas present SportingbetUSA will cover all deposit   fees during the month of December made by credit card, Pay Pal or Fire Pay.  2. Another deposit option is Western  Union . We will cover fees for Western Union deposits of $300  or more.   3. Play with 50% of your deposit before we receive it! Deposit with  a Cashier's  Check  or Bank  Wire  and play with 50% of that deposit when we receive fax confirmation  of shipping. 	[IMAGE]
10%  Reload Bonus

SportingbetUSA  is offering a great opportunity to its clients. A special 10%  Re-Load Bonus . If you make a Re-Load deposit between  December 6th and midnight December 7th,  SportingbetUSA will give you a 10% Cash Bonus  and as usual you Bet The Bonus Only Once before it's yours.

 Get your deposit  in so you can wager on some of these great football match-ups:  Sunday, Dec. 9 Chicago  at Green Bay, 1:00 PM ET San Francisco at St. Louis, 1:00 P.M.  ET Check  Out Our Lines On These Games
 Click Here To Chat Live  With A Customer Service Representative. [IMAGE] 		Daily  Pick Four Contest  Free  Entry  Answer four questions on the games correctly and you win $1,000!     [IMAGE]  Check  Out OurNFL Props

To  unsubscribe from this mailing list, send us an email   with the word "remove" in the subject field. If you've received  more than one of this emails contact Customer  Service . No hard feelings! Or  contact us at custserv@sportingbetusa.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 02/16/2001 04:44:19 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp021901.pdf


Shelley,  here is a copy of the UAF sub-committee findings and recommendations.   This is the committee I was on for a year.    I really believe this is a good document with a lot of valuable data but it is very large.   MIPS was the GMS system when this was written so many of the reports were MIPs generated.     They are working on reports for PGAS using "Business Objects" and Jodie and I will be receiving some one on one training tomorrow afternoon.

Tks - Mike W.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baker, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:39 AM
To:	Wagoner, Michael
Subject:	Measurement Continuous Improvement - UAF Report

Mike, all I have in electronic format is the UAF portion of the report. I couldn't find anything on PPA's.

Baker


Gentlemen:

Thought Don Deline's report would be of interest to you.  He plans on doing a
report daily.  The demonstrators are out in force this morning and we plan to
stay as far away from them as possible.

Joe Hillings

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 11/30/99
11:53 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Long                           11/29/99 08:29 PM

To: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WTO Notes

INSIDE (AND OUTSIDE) THE WTO

 The World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial meeting began yesterday in
Seattle ) well, almost.  An event scheduled for Monday was delayed for four
hours because of a breach of security. The official opening will not occur
until today but the &behind the scenes8 meetings and negotiations began
Monday November 29th and will continue until December 3rd.  In reality, there
are two events going on.  One is a circus / media event taking place in the
streets of Seattle and the second is the serious trade negotiations going on
between the trade ministers of 135 countries.  There are many important
people appearing this week to include President Clinton.  Even Fiedel Castro
has been invited to speak at the University of Washington which is located
less than a mile from the WTO activities.
 The circus events in the street are designed to sever the communications
between world trade officials and the rest of the world.  While it has its
comic side, its basic aim is anything but funny.  If the true story of trade
cannot be told, the only view that the world gets of the WTO is that it is an
event not to be taken seriously.  The street events are sort of like the
shell on an egg.  They prevent you from seeing the egg itself but the shell
is not the substance of the egg.
 In an attempt to make certain the media events in the street do not succeed
as far as Halliburton is concerned, I will attempt to give you a fair and
balanced account of what is really going on for the next four days.  This is
truly an interesting ministerial round of negotiations in that even Seattle
can,t seem to get a grip on what they stand for.  They bid on and won the
right to host the WTO this year and it will mean millions in income for the
city.  There are signs along the streets welcoming the WTO.  At the same
time, the city of Seattle and the country it is located in, are heavily pro
union and they are sponsoring a huge &anti-WTO8 rally.  They have granted
permits for anti-WTO parades on busy streets during rush hours which makes
many downtown workers less than happy.  These workers then vent their
frustration against the WTO for causing the streets to be blocked.  Life in
Seattle can best be described as &schizophrenic.8
INSIDE THE WTO
 Here is the &inside Story8.  From November 30th to December 3rd, most of the
world,s trade representatives are meeting in Seattle in private.  Meetings
will not be in the open for fear of disruption.  Demonstrators then use this
fact to say the talks are secrete because they are really all about world
dominance.  The truth is that the trade ministers will be reviewing the
global trading system and attempting to insure its dynamism and
responsiveness in the years to come.  Talks actually began in Geneva earlier
this year but the formal meetings to reach agreement will be this week.
 For 50 years, the WTO ) formally known as the GATT for &General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade8 has attempted to open world trade markets and set
predictable and stable rules for trade.  During this 50 year period, there
has been an 18 fold growth in international trade.  This was a reversal of
what is now widely recognized as disastrous policies of the 1930s when
increased trade barriers, discrimination among trading partners, and an
absence of agreed rules helped fuel the Great Depression.
 The beginning of this ministerial round finds some important issues to be
resolved in order to eliminate barriers that currently inhibit trade.  The
largest barrier is agriculture because European and Japanese farmers are
heavily subsidized so that they can compete with the United States.  The
United States Trade Representative (USTR) office listed seven other issues of
concern to be discussed and agree upon during the negotiations.  Most
important to Halliburton is the issue of services.  Our company performs
energy services all over the world but the WTO has never looked at trade
barriers in the energy services area.  The USTR representative present at the
kickoff meeting on Monday morning was asked if energy services were being
discussed in this round and she assured us that it would be a significant
part of the new negotiations.  The USTR is hopeful that this week will end
with agreements between all parties as to the issues to be resolved over the
next three years and they are confident of success.
OUTSIDE THE WTO
 A small band of demonstrators, most dressed like skeletons, animals, and
turtles, took to the streets on Sunday November 28th for a preview of things
to come.  They demonstrated in front of the GAP clothing store downtown.  (A
number of the demonstrators were seen to be wearing GAP jeans and jackets
under their skeleton suits).  They were demonstrating against GAP,s use of
&slave labor.8  Street interviews indicated that no one was to articulate
about where these slaves were.  The crowd of about 200 was well organized, if
uninformed, and moved to an abandon warehouse where they broke into the
building in order to occupy it.  Police did not attempt to eject them ) they
simply cut of the power and water to this old, concrete, damp, and cold
building.  In addition, homeless people through out Seattle were moved during
the weekend for the duration of the WTO in order to allow demonstrators the
opportunity to occupy their places on the streets.  It seems many of the
demonstrators had neglected to make reservations elsewhere.  Rain is expected
Tuesday and Wednesday which should add to the demonstrators woes.
 Seattle morning news carried a very level broadcast listing the
environmental and labor demands of the demonstrators and also relating the
fact that $42 billion in trade is done by Washington each year.  $258 million
in grain alone was sold to Japan during 1998.  Somewhere in excess of 1/3 of
Washington,s economy is based on foreign trade and they are now the third
largest trading state behind California and Texas.  This all adds to the
schizophrenia that is beginning to be known as Seattle.


Total Trades for Day	  	 572

 	 EOL Trades for Day	  	 404

 	 ICE Trades	  	 3

 	 EPMI ICE Trades	  	 41

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/01/2001   To: 11/14/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 11/01/2001   To: 11/14/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 390	 6,063,856	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 38	 1,276,554
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 209	 3,011,800	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 83	 2,804,626
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 289	 6,673,591	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 209	 8,144,373
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 1,143	 1,478,048	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 428	 1,094,049
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 682	 865,800	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 281	 528,489
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 881	 1,271,152	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 447	 1,818,063
 	 Real Time	 816	 20,700	  	 Real Time	 294	 27,222

 	 Grand Total	 4,410	 19,384,947	  	 Grand Total	 1,780	 15,693,376

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 17	 276,000	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 2	 20,000
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 32	 555,600	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 7	 251,233
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 53	 1,095,125	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 8	 366,245
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 107	 216,008	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 53	 158,968
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 80	 89,160	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 32	 33,276
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 68	 77,200	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 43	 143,601
 	 Real Time	 47	 1,175	  	 Real Time	 23	 1,196

 	 Grand Total	 404	 2,310,268	  	 Grand Total	 168	 974,519

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001	  	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001
 	 Long Term West Management	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Short Term West BOM	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 0	 0	  	 Daily	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date EOL	 9	 2,200	  	 Month-to-Date EOL	 0	 0
 	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0	  	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date Enpower	 2	 2,003	  	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001
 	 EPMI California Services	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date	 0	 0
 	 Enpower daily deals	 0	 0

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 11/14/2001   To: 11/14/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Cob (P, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $     22.75
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 2,000	 400	  $      19.15
 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 1,000	 0	  $     16.72
 	 Mid C (P, Bal Month)	 14,400	 0	  $     21.43
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 90,000	 0	  $     32.54
 	 Mid C (P, Jan-02)	 20,800	 0	  $     33.00
 	 NP-15 (HE 1700)	 25	 0	  $     27.50
 	 NP-15 (HE 1900)	 50	 0	  $     28.50
 	 NP-15 (HE 2100)	 50	 0	  $     25.50
 	 NP-15 (HE 2200)	 50	 0	  $     25.50
 	 NP-15 (P, Next Day)	 4,800	 800	  $     24.30
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 2,600	 400	  $      17.18
 	 NP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 9,600	 0	  $     25.75
 	 NP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 60,000	 0	  $     32.67
 	 NP-15 (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     33.70
 	 Palo (HE 1700)	 25	 0	  $     21.00
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 1,400	 0	  $     12.50
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 10,000	 0	  $      18.71
 	 Palo (P, Bal Month)	 72,000	 0	  $     22.62
 	 Palo (OP, Dec-01)	 25,800	 0	  $     19.33
 	 Palo (P, Dec-01)	 70,000	 0	  $     27.20
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 62,400	 0	  $     29.41
 	 Palo (P, Mar-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     29.25
 	 Palo (P, Jun-02)	 10,000	 0	  $     41.25
 	 Palo (P, Jul-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     54.50
 	 Palo (P, Aug-02)	 32,400	 0	  $     61.00
 	 Palo (P, Sep-02)	 28,800	 0	  $     47.67
 	 Palo (P, Apr-02)	 10,400	 0	  $     30.00
 	 Palo (P, Q1 02)	 30,400	 0	  $     29.25
 	 Palo (P, Q2 02)	 61,600	 0	  $     35.00
 	 Palo (P, Q3 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     55.00
 	 SP-15 (HE 1100)	 25	 0	  $     26.50
 	 SP-15 (HE 1700)	 25	 0	  $     26.75
 	 SP-15 (HE 1900)	 50	 0	  $     28.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 6,000	 0	  $     24.07
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 1,200	 0	  $     16.50
 	 SP-15 (P, Bal Month)	 19,200	 0	  $     24.90
 	 SP-15 (OP, Dec-01)	 17,200	 0	  $     22.25
 	 SP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 40,000	 0	  $     30.13
 	 SP-15 (P, Q1 02)	 91,200	 0	  $     32.17
 	 SP-15 (P, Cal 03)	 122,800	 0	  $     44.50

 	 Grand Total	 980,700	 1,600	  $ 1,196.15


Stacey,

It looks like your missing paths revealed a quirk in our suppression of zero
paths.  There were 4 paths initially entered as zero, then changed to
non-zero on a later date.  The system did not correctly determine that the
zero path should no longer be suppressed.

We have fixed the 4 paths affected and have corrected the code so this won't
happen any more.  Below is a screen print of the Nov 22 problem that is now
fixed.

Thanks, d.n.


Tim,

In Oct 2001 I produced the attached reports for Michael Paine. I hope these
are helpful.

Mark


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there are any
personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please
insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or the
Global Credit Hotline at x3-1803.


I think I've found what the PCA trustee may rely on in asserting unjust
enrichment. I think the argument fails, but my guess is that the following is
the basis.

It is black letter law that "[a] remedy such as unjust enrichment that is
based
on quasi-contract or a contract implied in law is unavailable when a valid,
express contract governing the subject matter of the dispute exists. . . .
Similarly, the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply when the
contractual
duty has been performed."  "The fact that a party to a contract has made a
profit is an insufficient ground on which to order restitution on a theory of
unjust enrichment. . . . The doctrine does not operate to rescue a party from
the consequences of a bad bargain, and the enrichment of one party at the
expense of the other is no unjust enrichment where it is permissible under the
terms of an express contract. . . . Unjust enrichment is not a proper remedy
merely because it might appear expedient or generally fair that some
recompense
be afforded for an unfortunate loss to the claimant or because the benefits to
the person sought to be charged amount to a windfall."  Burlington Northern
Railroad Co. v. Southwestern Electric Power Co., 925 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App --
Texarkana 1996), aff'd, 966 S.W.2d 467 (1998).

That is all great for us.  There are, however, cases that echo what appears to
be an exception to the rule that unjust enrichment is unavailable when a
contract exists:  "the principle of unjust enrichment suggests that
restitution
is an appropriate remedy in circumstances where the agreement contemplated is
unenforceable, impossible, not fully performed, thwarted by mutual mistake, or
void for other legal reasons."    PCA will argue that First Energy's failure
made PCA's continued performance of all of its obligations impossible, and the
profits made by the defendants when they resold their power to parties other
than PCA constitutes unjust enrichment.

As to the other defendants who don't have a payment default but terminated or
suspended because of  lack of adequate assurance, that argument at least might
(I underscore might) pass a red-face test.  However, Enron terminated because
of
non-payment -- which was not rendered impossible because of First Energy's
failure.    Further, construing this exception as PCA might suggest would
swallow the general rule that unjust enrichment  is unavailable when an
express
contract governing the subject matter of the dispute exists.

I have not yet found any cases that use this exception in a fact pattern
similar
or analogous to ours.  Most of the cases that use this exception are
completely
distinguishable (negotiations over contract not completed, but one party
received benefit from anticipated contract, mutual mistake existed in
connection
with contract, money was provided for special services that became impossible
to
carry out).

As I said in my voice mail, look at your calendar and let me know some
proposed
dates for an initial conference call with the Trustee.  Thanks and let me know
if you have any questions.

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (713-546-5000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Some Generators Say No As Calif Lawmakers Eye Haircut  ????
Updated: Monday, July 16, 2001 04:52 PM?ET ?????
?

By Jason Leopold and Jessica Berthold

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Some power suppliers said Monday they wouldn't
accept a move by California state lawmakers to allow them to collect just 70%
of what they are owed by Edison International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern
California Edison.

At issue are bills scheduled for hearings Monday and Tuesday in the state
Assembly and Senate to rescue Southern California Edison from the verge of
bankruptcy, where it has teetered for six months.

Both bills aim to spread out the costs of helping the utility recover $3.5
billion in wholesale power costs that it was forced to absorb as a result of
a retail rate freeze. Discounts to unpaid power bills may be needed to make
the rescue politically palatable. But some suppliers, which together are owed
about $1 billion by the utility, are balking.

"As we have said before, we fully expect to receive 100 cents on the dollar,"
said John Sousa, spokesman for Dynegy Inc. (DYN, news, msgs), which is owed
$265 million in California. (Generators' receivables due from Southern
California Edison alone weren't immediately available.)

Reliant Energy Inc. (REI, news, msgs), owed a total of $370 million, said it
too expects to receive full payment.

Williams Cos. (WMB, news, msgs), which hasn't disclosed its California
receivables, and Duke Energy (DUK, news, msgs), which is owed $410 million,
have said publicly that their companies would be willing to accept less than
100 cents on the dollar. But Duke spokesman Tom Williams said his company
would only negotiate with the utilities, not the state.

Pat Dorinson, spokesman for Mirant Corp. (MIR, news, msgs), which is owed
$385 million in California, wouldn't say whether the company would accept
less than what its owed. But he said the company wasn't included in the
negotiations when the bill was drafted.

"We can't have a comprehensive solution if all parties are not at the table,"
Dorinson said. "No one has come to us and talked to us about what we are
willing to do or not do. You'd think the people producing the energy might
have on opinion on how things should be solved."

Suppliers said they weren't sure what action, if any, they'd take against the
utilities if such provisions were approved as part of a deal this week.

The Assembly and Senate proposals were expected to be debated on Monday and
Tuesday, with floor votes on Wednesday.

Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, said a rescue plan for
Southern California Edison could never pass the Legislature without
concessions from generators.

The proposals in both houses call for generators to accept 70 cents on the
dollar. In the Assembly, legislation introduced last week by Assembly Speaker
Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Keeley, aims to establish a trust account,
controlled by the state and the Public Utilities Commission, to reduce
payments to generators who overcharged for power.

"Our proposal protects those who deregulation has hurt most - consumers - and
ensures that California never sees a crisis like this again," Hertzberg said.
"It holds accountable those who have taken advantage of us and it promises
consumers that they will see rates go down rather than up."

Such a move may violate Constitutional protections regarding contracts, said
Kenneth Klee, a law professor at UCLA and attorney at Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff
& Stern LLP in Los Angeles who specializes in corporate reorganization,
bankruptcy law and insolvency.

"The contracts clause of the Constitution, Article 1, Section 10, prevents
the states from impairing the obligations of contracts," Klee said. "I
haven't seen the bill, but it occurs to me that if the state is trying to
tell Edison it can pay creditors 70 percent, that would be unconstitutional."

Klee's firm represents two independent generators in the legal wranglings
with Southern California Edison.

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

(Jessica Berthold contributed to this article.)

California Lawmakers Take Edison Rescue Down To The Wire  ????
Updated: Monday, July 16, 2001 04:19 PM?ET ?????
?

By Jason Leopold

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--It's coming down to the wire.

With just five days left before their summer recess, California lawmakers
were to take their first concrete steps Monday toward relieving Edison
International (EIX, news, msgs) utility Southern California Edison of the
massive power costs that have left it unable to meet its obligations.

Edison officials have warned that if the Legislature doesn't act by Aug. 15,
the deadline set in a memorandum of understanding signed with Gov. Gray Davis
on April 9, the utility's creditors may drag it into Bankruptcy Court.

The plans under consideration aren't entirely faithful to the MOU and present
their own risks, but Edison officials seemed relieved that progress was
finally being made.

"This is the culmination of a long period of negotiations," Brian Bennett,
vice president of external affairs for Edison International, said last
Friday. "We're pleased that both the Assembly and Senate are moving."

Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said Monday that the Assembly and Senate would
hold hearings on their versions of the rescue Monday and Tuesday, with floor
votes expected Wednesday.

The progress has boosted Edison International shares to their highest level
since mid-March. Edison shares closed Monday at $14.85, up 5 cents on the day
and more than 32% in July.

Under the MOU signed with the governor, the state would buy Southern
California Edison's transmission lines for $2.76 billion and enable the
utility to sell bonds backed by ratepayers to help it recoup $3.5 billion in
unrecovered wholesale power costs.

This week's events will test Edison's faith in the political process and its
lobbying prowess. The utility's northern California counterpart, PG&E Corp.
(PCG, news, msgs) unit Pacific Gas & Electric Co., pulled out of talks with
the governor and filed Chapter 11 on April 6.

Lehman Brothers analyst Dan Ford said in a research note Monday that chances
are good any action by lawmakers will arrive late or fall short of what's
needed.

"We believe odds for a speedy and palatable plan are less than 50-50," Ford
wrote.

Lawmakers are likely to pass a version of the MOU Edison signed with the
governor, but they will be preoccupied with the need to approve a budget, he
said.

"We expect the timing to slip and the deal to worsen for Edison
shareholders," Ford wrote. "If a modified MOU does pass both the house and
senate, we believe Edison will need to determine if they can stomach the
alterations, as the governor is unlikely to stop an alternative plan to
protect Edison shareholders."

Senate, Assembly Draft Bills

Assembly Democrats led by Speaker Robert Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, and Speaker
Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek, have introduced a 79-page version of
the MOU that calls for the state to purchase the utility's power lines at
twice their book value, as opposed to the 2.3 times offered by Davis.

Unlike the MOU, the bill doesn't indicate how much money Southern California
Edison is allowed to recover.

"That's very disturbing to us," Bennett said. "But at least we have a bill."

The Hertzberg-Keeley bill also builds in a "haircut" for suppliers. Under the
plan, funds raised by Southern California Edison on the strength of its
pending sale of power lines to the state would go into a trust, from which
power suppliers would be paid 70 cents on the dollar for what they're owed by
the utility.

Suppliers have sent differing messages on their willingness to accept less
than full payment, so it's unclear how they'd react to such a provision.

In the Senate, Sen. Byron Sher, D-Stanford, and Sen. Steve Peace, D-Chula
Vista, were crafting their own proposal in hopes of voting on and passing a
bill Tuesday, aides to both lawmakers said.

The Senate proposal aims to help the utility recover $3.5 billion in
wholesale power costs. Large businesses would responsible for paying $2
billion through a surcharge added to their rates, although that provision
faces heavy opposition from business groups.

Generators would be required to contribute $300 million by accepting just 70
cents on the dollar for the $1 billion they're owed. The remainder would be
covered by $1.2 billion in payments from the parent to the utility.

The proposal doesn't include the state purchase of the utility's transmission
lines envisaged in the deal struck by the governor, but does include an
option for the state to buy the lines at book value if the utility hasn't
returned to creditworthiness by Dec. 31, 2002.

Edison executives said they were concerned about the required payment for the
parent, saying Edison International's funds have dried up.

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 10/10/2000 04:19:13 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Waco visit

Great.  Why don't you plan on getting here by 3:00 p.m. (or sooner).  We'll
do a little seminar at 4 for the faculty (perhaps outlining your thoughts
on the paper we are preparing).  We'll do the class 6-7:30 or so (I'll get
you to your hotel for I teach until 10 pm).  Then we'll put in time Tue
working on the paper.

John

At 03:22 PM 10/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>John,
>
>Per our discussion, Nov 13 is fine.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 10/09/2000 05:27:30 PM
>
>To:   vkamins@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Waco visit
>
>
>Vince,
>
>I have penciled you in for Nov 13th for my class.  Does this work for you?
>This is a Monday and I would suggest you come up Monday afternoon, you can
>give a brief talk to our department late in the afternoon, and then you can
>talk to my Ex MBAs at 6 p.m. for an hour or so.  I'll get you to the hotel
>for the evening and we can work on the paper Tuesday morning.  I recommend
>this Mon noon through Tue noon arrangement since I will be out of town the
>weekend before the 13th.  If this needs reshuffling let me know.  We'll
>make it work.
>
>I look forward to talking with you later this week along with Mark Palmer.
>
>John
>
>
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


NOTE FROM THE EDITORS
The AmeriFlash Newsletter would like to keep you informed on global wholesale
news as well, so we have added business highlights from Enron's original
electronic newsletter, GlobalFlash, which was created by Enron Europe.

"What's on your Mind?"
If you have ideas or suggestions please forward them to Michelle Vitrella or
Kathie Grabstald.

FINAL DAY FOR THE PULSE

Today is the final day to provide feedback through the annual employee survey
-- The Pulse.  As of Thursday morning, 56.5% of the ENA/EGM/EIM employees
have taken part in the survey, which is an improvement from last year's
participation rate of 49%.  However, we are behind the company average and
most of the other business units.  Please take a few minutes today to provide
much needed and confidential comments regarding Enron and your work
environment.  The Pulse survey is located on the Enron intranet at
survey.enron.com.

If you like competition, here is how the ENA/EGM/EIM participation rate
stacks up against the other business units:

Enron Energy Services 96.88%
Enron Wind  89.96%
Enron India  89.47%
Net Works  77.78%
EE&CC   73.88%
NEPCO   64.37%
Enron South America 63.74%
Corporate Staff  63.52%
Company Average 61.10%
ENA/EGM/EIM  56.50%
Enron Broadband 55.89%
ETS (formerly GPG) 55.52%
Enron Europe  44.36%
APACHI  29.66%

Log on to survey.enron.com and make your opinions known.

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

OIL PRODUCTS
Congratulations to the US Oil Products Trading Team!  On October 4, 2000 they
successfully completed a deal with a volume of 2,400,000 barrels with a
Notional Value of $80,640,000.  This is the highest Notional Value associated
with an EOL trade.

Kudos again for another great deal. They have done another large
crack-spread, this time for 100,000 barrels per month for calendar 2001. This
trade notionally values out at over $40 million and is the second largest
transaction conducted to date on EOL.

STEEL
Steel Trading and Origination teams, headed by Greg Hermans and Tim
Battaglia, respectively, have already defined a Hot-Rolled coil financial
product.  The contract has been drafted and is currently being discussed with
customers.

Financial Hot Rolled Steel will be posted on EnronOnline, allowing the steel
industry to hedge their price exposure for the first time in history. The
access to hedging products will help the steel industry manage technicalities
and smooth cash flow.  Over time, forward price curves with transparent
pricing should allow the steel industry to also benefit from improved access
to capital.

The next challenge will be to educate the steel industry about financial
swaps and derivatives as risk management tools.  The $300 billion steel
market should provide an excellent growth opportunity for Enron.

PRINCIPAL INVESTMENTS
FuelCell Energy, Inc. recently announced that it has entered into an alliance
with ENA.  FuelCell Energy and Enron will work together to develop and market
FuelCell Energy's Direct FuelCellc (DFCc) products.  In connection with the
alliance, Enron has invested $5 million in the common stock of FuelCell
Energy.  Additionally, FuelCell Energy will issue warrants enabling Enron to
purchase up to 1.3 million shares of FuelCell Energy common stock.

Fuel cell developer Dais-Analytic Corp. also announced an alliance with ENA.
As part of this alliance, Enron has made an equity investment in
Dais-Analytic and will support market development, distribution and other
field services for Dais-Analytic's fuel cell, humidity control and related
products.

ENA RESEARCH GROUP
What does the FX and Sovereign Risk Group within ENA,s Research Department
do?  We provide forecasts of foreign exchange rates as well as revenue and
cost escalators corporate wide for project valuation.  We advise the FX and
interest rate desks on Central Bank policies of the G3.  In addition, we
provide sovereign risk analysis on countries important to Enron's various
business units upon request, as well as provide services related to the
global macroeconomic outlook.  Our sovereign risk analysis is used in the
development of the E-ratings in cooperation with the Risk Assessment and
Control Group.  We have recently developed a presentation on &Fundamentals of
Non-ferrous Metals8 as well as one on "Sovereign Risk8.  We also advise the
fundamental analysis group within Enron Global Markets.

What,s new from the Country Risk and Foreign Exchange Team? On October 13th,
2000, we launched a new product called the Enron &International Monitor,8 an
international economic review that will be published each Friday by the FX
and Sovereign Risk Group.  The purpose of this product is to inform the
foreign exchange traders as well as management about important international
economic events and their impact on currency and financial markets.  Special
emphasis is placed on potential central bank policy changes and the impact
these changes have on interest rates and currencies.  We also monitor other
key markets, with a special focus on oil, and its impact on consumer,
producer and equity prices. The International Monitor can be found on the ENA,
s web site, by accessing
http//ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/research/ForeignExchange/FXMain.htm.

Please email Leann Walton if you would like to receive the International
Monitor weekly by email, or if you would like us to email you the first two
issues.  Visit our web site at http://home.ect.enron.com/ - Select
Departments / Research.  You will find also many useful links to other web
sites here relevant to Enron,s businesses.

NEWS FROM GLOBALFLASH

Enron Launches Financial Plastics & Petrochemicals Derivatives on EnronOnline
Enron is to start trading a new range of financial swap contracts for the
plastics and petrochemicals industry on www.enrononline.com, the company,s
free, real-time Internet-based trading platform. This is the first time that
these derivative products, designed to help clients better manage the price
volatility which characterises the multi-billion dollar industry, have been
made available on the Internet in Europe.

Gas Deliveries in Germany
Since 1 October 2000, Enron has been the first and only non-incumbent player
to be able to serve customers within Germany by delivering gas to three local
utilities, those of Heidelberg, T_bingen, and Bensheim.  Carsten Haack who
closed the first deal with Heidelberg and was in charge of negotiation of the
transport did mention that the procedures are still complicated and lengthy
and that the terms and conditions for future agreements will need to be
easier, more transparent and standardised. Helge-J_rgen Beil from the
Frankfurt office who closed the gas deals with the municipalities of T_bingen
and Bensheim said that these deliveries are encouraging but do not guarantee
the future yet.   Another positive aspect is that Enron's continental gas
trading team was able to do the first gas trade within Germany with some of
the gas Heidelberg contracted for but could not take on.

Liquid Fuels Group Launches Tanker Freight Forwards
Scott Moncrieff, a director in the group, has with his team introduced tanker
freight forward contracts on to EnronOnline, to offer a standardised hedging
contract in today's highly volatile tanker market, currently worth in excess
of US$ 10 billion per annum.

And on the Dry-Side......
Pierre Aury, Chris Connelly and their team introduced a similar on-line
forward freight swap in June and to date, have traded contracts with a
notional value of US$ 8 million, equivalent to 20 million metric tonnes of
combined physical and financial contracts.  The routes are  from Colombia and
South Africa to Rotterdam, which are key routes for coal transport.

WELCOME

Transferred Into ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Johnny R. Palmer/Staffing Resources, Anna Briggs/Principal Investing,
Carol Coats/Human Resources
EGM ) Andrea Hauser/US-GP Products Trading

New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) David Jones/East Origination, Marnie Lamb/Merchant Finance, Mathew-Joy
Noveena/Tax, Reynaldo Romero/Gas Assets Oper Mgmt, Mary Symes/West
Origination-Portland
EGM ) Brad Lawson/Financial Operations, Sandeep Ramachandran/Weather Trading

IN THE NEWS

&Enron delivered very strong earnings growth again this quarter, further
demonstrating the leading market positions in each of our major businesses,8
said Kenneth L. Lay, chairman and CEO of Enron. &Our wholesale and retail
energy businesses have achieved record-setting levels of physical deliveries,
contract originations and profitability. We operate in some of the largest
and fastest growing markets in the world, and we are very optimistic about
the continued strong outlook for our company.8  --- from Enron's 3rd Quarter
Earnings Press Release

NUGGETS & NOTES

&I,m looking for some high velocity capital.8  -  Brian Redmond,
President/HPL, Managing Director/Assets/Upstream Origination-ENA

&Can I get this NOW?8 - Gary Hickerson, Managing Director/Equity Trading-EGM

"I like the innovative ways that Enron does things. They take a refreshing
approach to the stagnant steel industry." - Kevin O'Donnell, Director/Steel
Trading

CONTEST

The cut off date for The Name This Newsletter Contest is Friday, November 3.
Keep the ideas coming!

TEASER

In your cellar there are three light switches in the OFF position. Each
switch controls 1 of 3 light bulbs on the floor above.  You may move any of
the switches but you may only go upstairs to inspect the bulbs one time.  How
can you determine the switch for each bulb with one inspection? Please send
answers to michelle.vitrella@enron.com, the winner will receive AMC Movie
passes.


Mike:

	It seems to me that we can proceed one of 2 ways.  Those alternatives are as follows:

		1.  We could write a letter to Texaco and demand payment for the withheld amount.

		2.  If we are paying them this month, we could withhold the $1.5 million from the
		    amount we are paying them.  Of course, we would need to provide them some
		    sort of explanation.

	My preference at this time would be to do the first item.  If you could have someone provide me with the details of the transaction they withheld the money on I could draft the letter.  If that letter brought no response, then we could consider taking the action outlined in the second item.

	I trust all is well with you.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	Texaco

Jeff,

How should proceed with Texaco and their 1.5 million withholding?

Thanks,
Mike


I need a number where you can be reached on Friday evening.  I will be
getting the schedule after work on Friday and will call and let you know when
and where our games will be.

D


Ben,

We have a draft of the VEPCO "standard" interconnect, which has been
internally reviewed by Mitch Robinson and Christi Nicolay.  Would you like a
copy? Nancy Wodka (Bracewell & Patterson, DC office) is outside counsel
working on it as well.  We have had no substantive discussions with VEPCO
about this agreement at all.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/12/2000 11:06
AM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll@ECT
09/12/2000 10:44 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: VEPCO Interconnection Agreement

Ben,

I spoke with the VA Power contact today who is responsible for the
interconnection agreement.  His name is Wayne Duman (804.257.4096,
Wayne_Duman@dom.com).

He suggested e-mailing him dates when Enron was available to go to Richmond
to discuss the interconnect.  I don't know if you want to go or if you plan
on sending one of the developers, but will you schedule this meeting (since I
won't be negotiating this part of it).

Thanks.  Let me know if you have any problems.

Heather


You know, generally, when I'm up in the morning, hanging around, getting
ready to start the day, I can't see any reason to put clothes on.  I am much
more comfortable that way.  Always been that way.

Good goal.  It would be easiest for me to have the meeting in SF.  Next
week's fine for me.  Monday's a day off for me.  You?  Or we could set
something up in the morning next week.  Just let me know.

	Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>
	01/11/2001 12:16 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: you and me

Sorry for surprising you this morning!!  Nothing wrong with being
comfortable in your birthday suit.

Speaking of birthdays, I think we should have a goal to get my company
acquired by your company by May 30, 2001.  Good goal, huh??

I want to talk to you about the details I have been thinking about while you
were gone.  When should we talk??  Let,s set up a meeting so we make sure to
move this all forward.

Welcome back.

-C

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' CLICK 'N SAVE E-MAIL UPDATE
January 1, 2002
=================================================================

THE FIRST DAY OF 2002!

Horns are blowing.
We're making a toast.

To the greatest Customers, Coast to Coast:

Here's to a New Year of LUV
That comes from the heart
We wish you prosperity,
on this brand new start.

Happy New Year!

=================================================================
IMPORTANT TRAVEL INFORMATION
=================================================================

For updated travel information, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

=================================================================
THIS WEEK'S SPECIALS
=================================================================
1. southwest.com Specials for purchase through January 3, 2002
2. Subscriber Information

=================================================================
CLICK 'N SAVE SPECIALS
=================================================================
Albany, NY
 $77 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $68 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $41 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $63 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Austin, TX
 $42 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $52 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $35 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Birmingham, AL
 $62 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $54 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Boise, ID
 $37 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $70 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Burbank, CA
 $35 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR

Chicago Midway, IL
 $52 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $62 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL

Cleveland, OH
 $35 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Columbus, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $64 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $65 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Detroit, MI
 $63 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $52 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $79 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $38 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $50 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $55 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $55 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Jackson, MS
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Jacksonville, FL
 $77 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $40 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Kansas City, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Las Vegas, NV
 $35 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $48 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $36 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $40 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $65 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $79 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Los Angeles, CA
 $79 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $46 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Louisville, KY
 $68 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $69 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Lubbock, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $61 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Manchester, NH
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $42 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO

Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $66 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH

Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $48 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $40 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL

Oakland, CA
 $48 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $49 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $89 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Omaha, NE
 $63 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA

Ontario, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $38 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Orlando, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $69 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY

Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $36 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA

Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $94 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Providence, RI
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $52 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $50 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $37 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $46 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $42 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $50 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $49 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $63 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $38 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX

San Diego, CA
 $40 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $42 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA

San Jose, CA
 $38 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $50 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $49 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

Spokane, WA
 $34 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $49 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

St. Louis, MO
 $54 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

Tampa Bay, FL
 $70 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $64 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH

Tucson, AZ
 $41 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $94 one-way, to/from Portland, OR

Tulsa, OK
 $36 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $61 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $79 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $66 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN

=================================================================
IMPORTANT DETAILS
=================================================================
*Available only on southwest.com.
*21-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares do not include security fee.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel January 21, 2002 through end of schedule,
 except May 24, and 27, 2002.
*Purchase through January 3, 2002,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e010102

=================================================================
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
=================================================================
Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 (e.g., travel voucher, gift certificate, discount coupon)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Presidents Day and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

=================================================================
SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
=================================================================
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration on your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

=================================================================
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/cgi-bin/selectFlight

=================================================================

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2002 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: dperlin@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


FTR team,

The copy of the auction results that you got at yesterday's meeting is
incorrect. What happened was when I tried to sort the entire page, I only
highlighted the related column and expected Excel 98 would sort the whole
page. (As Steve told me before, I should highlight the whole thing if I try
to do sorting in Excel). I appolized for the misleading and have redone the
whole thing.  Thanks for the patience. Wish you all have a great weekend.


Hello Jay,

The On Line Registration Form is up and running. I cannot change the default
setting for the "Enter" key which is why we posted a warning at the top of
the page. Hopefully folks will read the warning.

See ya,
Bruno <><

PS to Jerry Booth - It's probably a good idea to start pushing the On-Line
registration to our congregation, other Church groups and the public.

-----Original Message-----
From: Reitmeyer, Jay [mailto:Jay.Reitmeyer@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:02 PM
To: bruno@ufreight.com
Subject: Registration system

I have had a few people test the system.  It looks like it works very
well except if you hit ENTER instead of TAB then the form will be
submitted.  If that could be corrected so that you have to hit the
SUBMIT button to submit, then I think it is ready to go.

Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you and thanks again for
your hard work on this.

Jay

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


The Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process began May 7.   It is
important you access the Performance Evaluation Process (PEP) system
(http://pep.enron.com) to approve your Assistant's list of suggested
reviewers.  The list of suggested reviewers should include all of the
Assistant's assignments, and possibly 2 of her peers or 2 reviewers from
outside our department (people they work with, not personal friends).  She
should also complete the self-evaluation form (even if she is a new hire).
Each employee can select up to a maximum of 7 reviewers, and they have an
opportunity to submit a list of up to 5 accomplishments on the
self-evaluation form.  In my role as Administrative Coordinator, I will be
completing an evaluation form for all Assistants so it is not necessary for
them to include me in the list of suggested reviewers.

As the immediate supervisor it is important you gather data, summarize it,
and provide written feedback on your Assistant to your group's OGC
representative.  All feedback must be completed by May 25.

Help Desk representatives are available to answer questions and provide
technical support throughout the process.  You can reach the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 713.853.4777, Option 4 or email:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Please logout and log back in - you will have to remark curves

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dunton, Heather
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Salisbury, Holden; Fischer, Mark; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Mallory, Chris; Driscoll, Michael M.; Motley, Matt; Swerzbin, Mike; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Balasundaram, Arun
Subject:	Curves 10/1

Arun is going to have to bring down the Curve Manager due to these issues:
No 10/31/01 or 11/1/01, due to this ST is having to mark 12/1/01.
Arun is going to fix these issues: he will have to bring it down and then back up.
In about 20min (10:45) please log out and login -> then check to see what needs to be remarked.

Thanks,
Heather


Happy New Year.  We hope your holidays were enjoyable and restful.  For a pleasant start to 2002, please join your Enron colleagues for coffee and donuts this Friday, January 11, from 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. in the lobby of the Enron Building.  We look forward to seeing you there.


Tana:  Have you responded to either Greg or Molly?  Please call.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 08:23 AM -----

	Molly Harris
	08/18/2000 02:12 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

I understand Greg Penman has inquired for the same.  I would be happy to
coordinate amongst us and informed Greg accordingly.

Thank you
Molly

Molly Harris
08/18/2000 01:58 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

Tana

Is it possible to get electronic file for the Enron North America and Peoples
Energy Corporation ISDA?  Is it in Word?  I am trying to get our new JV,
Midwest Energy Hub, to utilize our format for the template for MEH.

Thanks
Molly

a.huprikar@pecorp.com on 08/17/2000 03:48:36 PM
To: molly.harris@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ENA ISDA with PEC

Molly,

Could you send me an electronic version of the ISDA that was signed between
ENA and PEC. I understand from our attorney that we did not work with an
electronic version, only a hard copy. In order to create an ISDA template
for MEH, I need the electronic version.

Thanks

Aparna

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


I, of course MUST have my lunch hour.  But after that is over, say 1:00 or so, lets get together.  Shemin, you set the time.  Wade, bring some of those letters you are talking about down below.

Kathryn, we are going to discuss what you and I talked about yesterday.  Can we just go back to ??Dec 2nd?? and terminate the pools without Dominion billing Enron all these extra charges.  You and Patricia can decide if you want to come.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:30 AM
To:	Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret; Price, Wade R.
Subject:	FW: Dominion Transmission Notices

Another interesting item.  Call me when you get a chance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Price, Wade R.
Sent:	Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:19 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	Dominion Transmission Notices

I am in receipt of several faxes from Dominion Transmission Inc which inform Enron of DTI's intention of not crediting gas from listed meters/producers to Enron's pool.  Per Dan Baney of DTI, the listed effective dates are dates as of which gas will not be credited.  In some cases, they are taking back gas previously allocated to the pool.

While DTI is asking for a signoff from Enron agreeing to these statements, we have not sent any back.  I have forwarded all of these to you for handling along with the many other issues between Enron, DTI, and the affected producers.

WRP


Stan,
	Could you please look at these deals and get back w/ Evelyn.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Metoyer, Evelyn
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Stokley, Chris
Subject:	APX Deals needing confirmations

Hi Chris,

Here are the deals I spoke to you about over the  phone.  These are hourly deals however, based on the information that is on APX's website I can't seem to match these deals with anything.

The deal numbers are: 595705, 595714, 595819.  They were traded at the end of April.

Thanks very much for your help.

Evelyn


Per our phone conversation. <<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


You have been invited to attend a team building outing that is sponsored by the Service Desk.   Game time is usually around 7:05  pm and we  will be having drinks at Cabo around 5 pm.

I hope that you can make it.  Let me know by this Friday, June 6th, whether you will attend.

Thanks, Lets party

JMF


We have our first round United Way BIG WINNERS (of the valuable $25 gift
certificates to the Enron Signature Shop)!!

Margaret Carson
Karen Denne
Pat Keene
Lisa Feener

We will have another drawing early next week, so please logon now to
UnitedWay.enron.com.

This act of giving makes us all winners!  Thanks!


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 04:26
PM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/24/2000 03:38 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: WestLB

Genpower has on Change Order on each of the two Contracts pending, for
$133,000 on each.  The CO has been fully approved, but I have not been able
to catch up with the paper work to get it signed by Enron.  It has been
passed back and forth between NEPCO and GE for edits.  Last I heard, GE had
signed it and would send it to me.  That was 10 days ago.