Future NCL Queens,
 Attached are my REVISED suggestions regarding your office and things
relating to hours and awards.  I am attempting to gather my ideas at the end
of my reign and pass them to the appropriate incoming queens.  I have spoken
with some of you regarding these things and given some of you a rough draft
of my suggestions. What you do with these suggestions is between you and the
incoming hours queen, Lady Linda Christy.  Some of these things have been
done, some haven't. I am sending these with Queen Mum's (Pam Stone)
blessing. She has seen the rough draft and asked that the revised go
directly to the new queens.
The incoming hours queen may have input also.  Questions?  Ask.
The soon to be retired hours queen,
Sarah

 - Suggestions.doc


Hi there,

Paige is still here.  I think she may leave tomorrow.  Have you ever visited
her website?  Here's a link:
http://www.southwestern.edu/~recordp/

You might trying clicking on the link to see if it takes you directly to her
web page.  She will have the same email address again this year.  I suspect
she will have the same mailing address as well, since it is a box number.

Michael slept well this weekend.  He had a great birthday.  He takes his
dinosaur everywhere.  It is so funny, because the button gets pushed
accidently when it is being hauled around, so it is constantly growling.

We saw a few drops of rain, but nothing to help the water bill.  The smog is
horrible.

I'm in town all week this week, which is nice.  Neil and I have a birthday
party to go to for our neighbor Donnie (he was at the party) on Friday, so
Michael will spend some time with Charlotte again. She should be off of most
of her restrictions tomorrow, so maybe he will get to see her more.

We went to the Astros game last night, and they actually won.  Sammy Sosa hit
a home run harder than any I've seen before.  Even some of the Astros fans
clapped at the sheer force of it.  The pitcher said he watched it, just
because he had never seen such an awesome hit.

Too bad about the heat, but what the heck can you do about it anyway?

Love,

Kay

Bill and Rita McCall <bmccall@wcnet.net> on 08/22/2000 10:17:25 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Palacios calling

Hi Kay Kay,Just wanted to say Hi. Did Houston really see rain today? We had
about five drops. We have had a nice quiet week. We did buy five pounds of
shrimp from Grassy Point. Has Michael rested up from this birthday party?
We plan to be here until sometime next week. Has Paige gone back to school
and will she still have the same email address? Tell neil Dad will sent a
fishing report when he has one. He really has not fished much. It's just to
hot. Love,Mother


Hi Sally -

Just wanted to let you know that I have recently begun collaborating with an ebusiness consultant from CGI - a large Canadian systems integrator with an energy practice - on a demand-generation piece that should be published in the trades in a few months.  The slant is on the scaling systems - IT and people - and the reduction in costs brought about by mid and back office systems affected by a sharp increase in online trading in the energy sector.  Eventually, will probably be looking for some quotes and input from you or your ops people.  I'll keep you up to date.

Thanks,

Fred


Meter 0984179 Hoff Heller Unit #22 CDP was shut-in at approximately 9:20 AM
today (February 17, 2000).

On Wednesday, February 16, the meter was found flowing 25 lb dew point gas.
The pumper was given 24 hours to correct the problem.  On February 17, the
meter was found flowing 40 lb dew point gas.

If you have any questions please call me at 36449.

Thanks
Gary H


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
09:34 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/09/2001 09:19 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/9/01


Thank you for shopping at Macys.WeddingChannel.com.

This is to confirm that order# W1021382-014043335, shipment# 001,
was shipped on November 20, 2000.

It was shipped to the following address:
MS. LISA KOOB
5106 JASON STREET
HOUSTON, TX  77096

The following items were shipped:
  PRODUCT DESCRIPTION           QTY
REGGAE                            1

The tracking number(s) listed below will allow you to track the
progress of your shipment by accessing the USPS website at
http://www.usps.com/cgi-bin/cttgate/ontrack.cgi
Tracking Number(s): 01622888352002210981

Thank you again,

Macys.WeddingChannel.com Customer Service
http://www.Macys.WeddingChannel.com
CustomerService@MacysWeddingChannel.com
1-888-989-9333


This is a very rough Agenda, if you have any updates please let me know a.s.a.p.

Thanks

Sue

________________________________

Sue Ford
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-5176
Fax: 713-646-5930
sue.ford@enron.com


In reviewing some of the imbalance numbers, I discovered that Valero Texoma
(#71) BAV volumes have not fed into POPS since 3/14 causing an out of balance
at the meter in excess of 500,000mm month to date.  The more critical part of
this problem, however, is that POPS has fed 0 volumes back to Sitara on some
of the HPLC deals.  This means that these purchase volumes (expenses) have
not been picked up in Tom's P&L and are, instead, sitting in UA4.  To the
extent that the purchase prices vary from the UA4 value, the P&L may take a
hit when these actual volumes flow through.

I realize that Kim is out and that you guys are stretched thin, however, a
problem of this magnitude needs to be addressed as soon as it's discovered.
Someone needs to be overriding the 0 volumes so that Sitara is receiving
correct information and the P&L is kept as accurate as possible.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.


Thank you for all of the help and inspiration you have given us these many years.  I will miss you very much but am very happy for your new opportunity - it is well deserved.  (My now ex-wife) Sandy was very grateful for the help you gave her, and still asks about you when the subject of the Body Shop comes up.

Where is your new fitness center?  We may have to come by and check it out.

God bless you each day.  Keep your positive attitude and you will be blessed.


yes

	"Don Schultz" <DSCHULTZ@HOLLANDHART.COM>
	01/12/2001 12:59 PM

		 To: <fspillman@akingump.com>, <mcallan@aogc.com>, <cliff@atkinson-thal.com>,
"John Thal" <john@atkinson-thal.com>, <jeffrey.perryman@atmosenergy.com>,
<john.holloway@atmosenergy.com>, <bill_cominsky@bakerbotts.com>,
<mbeatty@beattylaw.com>, <nlorentzatos@br-inc.com>, <crk@browndrew.com>,
<jgriffin@bspmlaw.com>, <rooth@chaffe.com>, <deru@chevron.com>,
<mgwilson@cmsenergy.com>, <basil.nichols@coastalcorp.com>,
<becky.noecker@coastalcorp.com>, <michael.heydt@coastalcorp.com>,
<mike.williams@coastalcorp.com>, <jbarrym@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
<ddalrymple@coral-energy.com>, <dgraham@ctdk.com>,
<judith.matlock@dgslaw.com>, <cvr@dn.zhgm.com>, <ahamilton@dsda.com>,
<enjones@duke-energy.com>, <jlre@dynegy.com>, <hughlaw@email.msn.com>,
<rgregory@enogex.com>, "Andrew Edison" <andrew.edison@enron.com>,
<bdavis@enron.com>, <linda.r.guinn@enron.com>, <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>,
<barry_hunsaker@eogresources.com>, <griffinj@epenergy.com>, "David Waterson"
<waterson.david@epenergy.com>, <lee.keller@et.pge.com>,
<john_boese@ffhsj.com>, <lmcbride@flks.com>, <jgoering@foulston.com>,
<amorgan@fulbright.com>, <bsingletary@gablelaw.com>,
<apickens@gibbs-bruns.com>, <jwallbillich@glgt.com>,
<dpepper@hartzoglaw.com>, <kdevans@hhlaw.com>,
<tnicholas@hirstapplegate.com>, <dsouthard@hklaw.com>, "Dawne Davis"
<ddavis@hollandhart.com>, "Don Schultz" <DSCHULTZ@HOLLANDHART.COM>,
"Geraldine Brimmer" <gbrimmer@hollandhart.com>, "Linda Obrecht"
<LOBRECHT@HOLLANDHART.COM>, "Melissa Defratis" <MDEFRATIS@HOLLANDHART.COM>,
<rschneebeck@hollandhart.com>, "Valerie Arias" <VARIAS@HOLLANDHART.COM>,
<allenbrent@howrey.com>, <hendrixl@hro.com>, <amc@huntpetroleum.com>,
<dhoneycutt@intergen.com>, <cstahl@jenkens.com>, <brightk@kochind.com>,
<cmkornick@liskow.com>, <cmcintyre@mcguirewoods.com>,
<fieldsr@mckinneystringer.com>, <ericb@mdsslaw.com>,
<hopgoodt@mduresources.com>, <glen_johnson@michcon.com>,
<jkennedy@morrislaing.com>, <wharper@mtpower.com>, <bbowles@mvplaw.com>,
<gjterwil@mwbb.com>, <bradley.zuke@neg.pge.com>, <carl.fink@neg.pge.com>,
<donna.ceruti@neg.pge.com>, <pam.mccaskey@neg.pge.com>,
<ray.albrecht@oceanenergy.com>, <laura_abrahamson@oxy.com>, <crmd@pge.com>,
<joyce_c_dailey@png.cng.com>, <rgonzal@pnm.com>, <keroger@ppco.com>,
<jalbright@psco.com>, <terriem@qstr.com>, <kerwin@reliantenergy.com>,
<scohen@sempra.com>, <drobinso@skadden.com>, <brdeboer@tombrown.com>,
<delila.wilson@tombrown.com>, <ecarlson@transmontaigne.com>,
<mlthomps@twgfirm.com>, <gary.n.brown@usa.conoco.com>, <bdawson@velaw.com>,
<dpoole@worsham.net>, <fneville@wpdn.net>, <gottschalk@wtklaw.com>,
<com@www.hartzoglaw>, <basay@wyoming.com>, <dkuntz@zkslaw.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Test of Email Group

Please reply to confirm receipt of this message.  I've received a
handful of reports that folks in our email groups are not getting some
messages, even though our software shows them in the groups, confirms
transfer of the messages, and we get no undeliverable messages back.
Sorry for bugging you, but we're trying to determine the extent and
cause of the problem.  Thanks. Don.


Steve, as Dana indicated in his response to your message, Louis Dreyfus is
maintaining that their transactions with Todoroff are totally legitimate and
binding upon EOTT.  Vinson & Elkins is of the opinion that before we assert
an argument to Louis Dreyfus regarding the validity of their contract, we
need to hear the tapes of Todoroff's conversations with Louis Dreyfus.  The
"paper" that we have (including the notes from the Louis Dreyfus contract
administrator) certainly indicates that Louis Dreyfus suspected or knew that
something was not quite right about the December 1999 transaction with
Todoroff, but it is not enough to make a very good case for challenging the
validity/enforceability of that contract.  We need more.  John DeGeeter of
Vinson & Elkins has spoken with Louis Dreyfus'  general counsel.  Louis
Dreyfus' general counsel has told John that before he will consider providing
EOTT with the tapes, he wants EOTT to set forth in writing the reason EOTT is
requesting the tapes.  Louis Dreyfus' general counsel has also indicated that
he is not sure that Louis Dreyfus taped these conversations.

Although a final decision has not been made, here's where I think we are
headed with Louis Dreyfus.  We will send their general counsel a letter next
week indicating the irregularities with this contract (e.g. the prices quoted
in the contract were far below market, and the contract administrator had
questions about Todoroff's authorization and the "legality" of the deal).
This proposed letter would then suggest that Louis Dreyfus provide us with
their tape recordings of the conversations with Todoroff in order that we can
immediately resolve our questions as to whether one of Louis Dreyfus'
employees knowingly assisted Todoroff in his scheme to defraud EOTT.  My
guess is that a letter of that nature will at least cause Louis Dreyfus'
lawyers to listen to the tapes.  If the tapes do contain incriminating
conversations, we might see a softening of their negotiating position.  If
the tapes do not contain anything incriminating, it would seem to be in Louis
Dreyfus' best interest to provide us with the tapes to support their position
that there was nothing irregular about the transaction.

Steve Duffy
03/16/2000 01:47 PM
To: Walt Zimmerman/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Todoroff Prosecution--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE

Thanks for the update, Walt.  One option we were considering was a "share the
pain" settlement with Dreyfus, whereby they would let us buy out of the
remaining position at a steep discount (to acknowledge their contributory
negligence in this matter).  Has there been any additional headway in this
area?  I'm on vacation and haven't heard anything on this.  Weren't we going
to send a V&E litigator to visit Dreyfus' general counsel? If we commence
legal proceedings against Dreyfus, things will become costly and contentious
between us. Information will come slowly and grudgingly.  We have copies of
some of their internal notes which indicate that they knew---or should have
known---that something wasn't quite right with Todoroff's situation.  Before
we start filing discovery motions, we should exhaust the possibility of
meeting with their general counsel to see if a quick "business" settlement
can be obtained.  Please advise. Thanks.  SWD

WALT
ZIMMERMAN
03/16/2000 11:47 AM

To: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Todoroff Prosecution--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE

Earlier this week, I spoke with Bill Moore (the chief prosecutor in the
Harris County District Attorney's Special Crimes Unit) regarding the
above-referenced matter.  Mr. Moore acknowledged receiving the investigative
materials that we submitted last week, and he indicated that his office is
commencing its review of those materials.  I emphasized to Mr. Moore the
desire of EOTT's management to have this case aggressively prosecuted.  Mr.
Moore acknowledged that the aggressive prosecution of this matter would send
a strong message to other traders who might consider dishonest acts, and he
assured me that his office would vigorously pursue this matter.  Based upon
some statements made by Mr. Moore during our discussion, it was obvious that
he recalled much of the presentation from our initial meeting.  I will call
Mr. Moore again tomorrow afternoon to get an update on the progress of this
matter.

We are also attempting to obtain from Louis Dreyfus tape recordings of
Todoroff's conversations with them regarding the series of deals that we are
describing as "The Second Transaction."  If Louis Dreyfus does not
voluntarily provide us with copies of those tapes (or if they assert that
tapes do not exist), the next step will be to consider filing a lawsuit or
seeking a bill of discovery in order to obtain the tapes.  Based upon some
notes we have received from a contract administrator at Louis Dreyfus, it
appears that Louis Dreyfus also suspected or knew that something was amiss
with The Second Transaction.  Assuming that Todoroff's conversations with
Louis Dreyfus were taped, the tapes should tell us whether Todoroff had a
conspirator at Louis Dreyfus who assisted him in his scheme to defraud EOTT.

If Louis Dreyfus does not voluntarily produce tape recordings of its
conversations with Todoroff, we will need some guidance from Enron as to how
aggressive we should be in attempting to obtain the tapes.


Sara,
Just in case we don't hear back from them, I dug up their phone & fax
numbers.  Fax # 011-44-207-577-2875, Phone # 011-44-207-577-2644

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001
03:02 PM ---------------------------

Hap Boyd
04/19/2001 11:29 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, John
Lamb/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Bob Gates/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: SCE & Enron Discussions on MOU - Proposed 4.19.01 Conference
Call at 12:30 Houston Time

Jim,
Ernon Wind appreiates item number 4 - getting full payment for past due and
going forward power deliveries. Additionally we would like the following:

1. Agreement that we can deliver up to the nameplatre capacity on our
existing contracts
2.Assurance of transmission access for the nameplate amount on all of our
contracts
3.Additional offtake agreements for future projects at a reasonable price
4 Ability to have EWG status tather than QF status under our existing
contracts
5. Support for the voluntary energy pricing provisions of S.B. 47x

Thanks,
Hap Boyd


My vote is to kill it.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 12/02/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------

Raymond Bowen@ECT
11/30/2000 12:18 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 2001 ENA/EGM/EIM CUSTOMER SKI PROGRAM

Dorie,
I share Dave's skepticism.

Ray Bowen

David W Delainey
11/30/2000 11:26 AM
To: Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 ENA/EGM/EIM CUSTOMER SKI PROGRAM

Dorie, I have to question the effectiveness of this program.  Over the years,
it appears that more spots are being filled by Enron people then customers.
The effectiveness of this forum from a customer point of view is
questionable.  I vote to kill it.

Please forgive the approach - but I would like to provoke a discussion with
my partners.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
11:20 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dorie Hitchcock                           11/30/2000 06:40 AM

To: Sylvia S Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robyn Zivic/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew H
Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Bierbach/NA/Enron@Enron, John Craig
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C
Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy King/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim Battaglia@Enron,
Douglas B Dunn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy
Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Howe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred
Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Sukaly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON,
John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 ENA/EGM/EIM CUSTOMER SKI PROGRAM

Winter is just around the corner and the new ski season will be opening
soon.  Please review the proposed information below, regarding the
ENA/EGM/EIM Customer Ski Program, to help us determine what our needs will be
for the 2001 season.

Location:  Beaver Creek, Colorado
Preliminary Dates:  February 21 - March 14, 2001
Approximate Cost Per Person:  $2,600 (based on 82 participants)

The preliminary dates have been divided into 6 trips:
TRIP	DATES	TOTAL # OF BEDS
Trip 1	Wed, February 21 - Sat, February 24	11
Trip 2	Sun, February 25 - Wed, February 28	17
Trip 3	Wed, February 28 - Sat, March 3	13
Trip 4	Sun, March 4 - Wed, March 7	13
Trip 5	Wed, March 7 - Sat, March 10	13
Trip 6	Sun, March 11 - Wed, March 14	15

The program cost per person includes:
? Four days/three nights accommodations in luxurious private homes in the
premier Holden Road/Borders Road area of Beaver  Creek with daily maid service
? Animated invitation with on-line registration
? Round-trip airport ground transportation
? Experienced property hosts
? Daily lift tickets and ski instruction
? Ski equipment rental
? Catered dinner two nights
? Catered breakfast daily
? Off-site dinner coordination
? Alternate activity coordination
? Private vans at each house
? One massage with experienced in-house massage therapists
? Enron promotional gift item
? Pre-program administration and coordination
? On-site operation

If you are interested in participating in the 2001 ski program, please submit
an email  request to me no later than Friday, December 8th, including the
following information:
Name
Company
Department
Telephone
Fax
Number of People
Choice of Dates (1st, 2nd & 3rd)
Company #
RC #

The week of December 11th, all requests will be compiled for review and final
approval.

Questions should be directed to my attention at (713) 853-6978.


This is the type of thing I'll be doing for the forseable future. It has been
great working with you.

Regards,

Rob


Jinbaek,

This is a project related to automated trading platforms for commodities.

Vince

Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 05/02/2001 05:21:40 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: summer work..

Dr. Kaminski,
thanks for your mail.

I am sorry that I'll not be available earlier,
I will talk with my advisor, but
probably it will be pretty negative.
however, I may be able to start it from June1,
depending on what he tells..
We will meet tomorrow afternoon,
so I'll be able to let you know
whether we can start work earlier then.

And could you tell me briefly
what are those projects you have in mind?

Thanks!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Wed, 2 May 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> Thanks for your message.
>
> We have a number of additional  fascinating projects that you can work
> on.  As a matter of fact, it would be great to have you here earlier.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jinbaek Kim" <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 05/02/2001 05:18:32 AM
>
> To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "Raghavan, Suresh"
>       <Suresh.Raghavan@ENRON.com>, "Mesquita, Ross"
>       <Ross.Mesquita@ENRON.com>
> cc:   <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu>
> Subject:  summer work..
>
>
> Long time no see,
> How have you been...must be busy and living a challenging life?
> I have been pretty busy too,
> to finish a project and write a paper, these days.
>
> Everything looks going OK for my summer internship.
> I took necessary steps to work out of campus, and sent
> signed contract to Molly a week ago..
>
> Here is what I am expecting to do in the summer.
> Please let me know if you have any change in mind.
> Actually, I wonder a little bit if DealBench changed its business model...
> and maybe you got priority in something different
> because it has been quite a while since we talked.
> I'd like to what's going on in DealBench team...
> Raghavan and Ross,
> if we talk over phone it will be great!
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
> If you think there is something else interesting to work with during the
> summer,
> to both you and I, please let me know.
> My interest is auction, market design, and simulation.
> I am taking a financial engineering class, (mostly on option pricing)
> and working on electricity generator valuation problem based on
> spark spread option.
>
> All of you,
> Let's keep in touch until we meet in June!!
>
> Best Regards,
> Jinbaek
>
>
> Tentative Work Period: 6/4 - 8/4
>
> 1. Tasks:
> 1) Survey on Auctions: the State of Art
> Single-item auction, Multi-Unit auction, Sequential auction,
> Multi-attribute auction, Combinatorial auction
>
>      - Theoretical
>      - Experimental
>      - Algorithmical
>
> 2) Deal Bench's Auction Model Analysis
>
> 2. Deliverables:
> 1) 3 Presentations:
>      - 1st presentation: around 6/30: on different auction types and
> researches
>      - 2nd presentation: around 7/15: the State of Art in auction studies
>      - 3rd presentation: around 8/1: Deal bench's model analysis
>
> 2) Report:
> Summary of auction study in laymen's term
> Deal bench's model analysis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


FYI, on Dabhol credit issues from Jane.  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 22/11/2000
17:39 ---------------------------

Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
22/11/2000 05:50
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc:

Subject: MSEB Payment Capacity

Doesn't look good any way you look at it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/22/2000 11:19 AM ---------------------------

Akshay Singh
11/21/2000 07:50 PM
To: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Shubh Shrivastava/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vivek
Kejriwal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Venkatesh
Gopalkrishnan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: MSEB Payment Capacity

Sandeep,

Attached herewith are slides re subject.

best wishes,

akshaya


Please be advised that effective Monday, September  10, 2001, the retention policy for all voice mails will be 30 days.


I'm oozing with free time.  Monday sounds great.  Thanks.

	Jacqueline Kelly <JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
	11/17/2000 01:12 PM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, Jacqueline Kelly
<JKelly@FairIsaac.com>
		 cc: "Chris Neale (E-mail 2)" <chrisjneale@hotmail.com>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>, "Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail)"
<kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu>, "Ted Chin (E-mail)" <tedchin@hotmail.com>
		 Subject: RE: StadiumS

Unless you guys will have a lot of free time this weekend, I propose we
divvy on Monday at the break.

-Jackie

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 11:05 AM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Cc: Chris Neale (E-mail 2); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Kimberely Kupiecki
(E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)
Subject: StadiumS

Thanks for hosting, Kim.  Jackie mentioned the list of tasks that remain to
get this done (e.g., graphs, make spreadsheet pretty, write-up, etc.).
I'lll do whatever needs to be done, so once folks have picked which task
they'd like to take on, just let me know what's left.  Or if there's
another way folks would like to divvy up the chores, that's great, too.
Have a great weekend.  See you Monday.

Jackie, could you email the latest version around when you get a chance?
Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


John,

He is currently a student at Carnegie Mellon, one-year computational finance
program. I got his resume recruiting in  the campus. I would recommend him as
a potential hire (my group or trading).

Vince

John J Lavorato@ENRON
12/10/2000 11:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: A resume - Canadian trader

Vince where did this resume come from and is he still employed by the
National Bank in Monteal.


Nagesh ,

I would like to have the CPR Position Manager resorted for the TEXASMKT
screen as Follows:

Houston Pipe Line
East Texas Gas Systems
NNGB
Humble Gas Pipeline
Channel Industries Gas
Centana Pipeline
Oasis Pipeline Comp
PG&E Valero
PG&E TECO
Lone Star Gas
Remaining pipelines in alphabetical order.

In addition to this, please sort the location level (zones) under Houston
Pipeline as follows:

01-Thompsonville
14-South Texas
02-Robstown
19-King Ranch
11-Corpus
03-A/S South
04-A/S Central
07-A/S East
08-East Texas
15-Katy
16-West Loop
10-Ship Channel
Remaining zones in numerical order

Let me know if you have any questions or problems.  Thanks.

Daren


This one should go to the crude traders.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 11:41 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	10/25/2000 11:50 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

Notice No. 00-362
October 25, 2000

To:
All NYMEX Division Members
All NYMEX Division Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

From: George Henderson, Vice President

Re: Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

It has come to the attention of the Exchange that some earlier publications
may contain an incorrect option expiration date. Please be advised that the
expiration date for the Crude Oil Options December 2000 contract month (LO
Z00) has been revised to Tuesday, November 14, 2000.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Floor
Departments Systems Area at (212) 299-2626.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-362)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000 01:41
PM ---------------------------

Nony Flores
01/19/2000 01:30 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REVISED Re: On-line GTC's for EPC and ECFC

Mark - I forgot to copy Dale Neuner on my message to you yesterday
afternoon.  Have you already forward it to him the revised GTC's?  If not,
I'll be glad to do it.

Thanks.
Nony
---------------------- Forwarded by Nony Flores/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2000 01:28
PM ---------------------------

Nony Flores
01/18/2000 05:12 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REVISED Re: On-line GTC's for EPC and ECFC

Mark -

We forwarding the revised GTC's for EPC and ECFC correcting the definition of
Commercial Terms in Appendix I as follows:

We've deleted this definition:

"Commercial Terms" means that part of this Agreement confirming in writing
the specific terms of a Transaction which may be in any form adequate at law
that is issued in connection with a Transaction.

and added the following new definition which mirrors the wording of Section
1.1 of the online GTC:

  "Special Terms and Conditions" means the special terms and conditions of a
particular Transaction for the sale or purchase of Products, including but
not limited to, payment terms, price, quantity/tolerance, Products
description, specifications, delivery location and delivery window shall be
as set forth on this website ("Special Terms and Conditions");
We've also made a global change to the entire document replacing "Commercial
Terms" with "Special Terms and Conditions."

 EPC   ECFC
Thanks.
Nony Flores

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Michael A Robison                           01/18/2000 11:17 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark:
The defined term "Commercial Term" which is contained in the Apendix I to the
EPC gtcs should have been modified to reflect the definitional changes made
in Section 1.1 of the gtcs.  I"ll work with Nony to get it corrected.

To: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

I have gone ahead and forwarded this and the ECFC version to the EOL people
to be uploaded.

I do have a concern though that I wanted to ask you about. These GTC's use
the defined term "Commercial Term" which is defined as follows:

"Commercial Terms" means that part of this Agreement confirming in writing
the specific terms of a Transaction which may be in any form adequate at law
that is issued in connection with a Transaction.

We have taken the position in our other EOL trading that the transaction is
complete and binding from the time we accept the counterparty's offer over
the system by reference to the GTC, the numbers submitted by the counterparty
(usually volume and price) and the Long Description.  We've gone to some
lengths to make sure that the combination of GTC, website numbers and Long
Description contain all of the necessary terms.  It's not clear to me that we
intend the website numbers and Long Description to satisfy the definition of
Commercial Terms.  Are these transactions not intended to be binding until
the confirmation is signed?  Any thoughts on this?

Nony Flores
01/11/2000 06:09 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven M Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: On-line GTC's for Enron Petrochemicals Company (EPC)

Mark -

Last week Dale Neuner was requested to add four new commodities to on-line
trading and Mike Robison and Steve Elliott have reviewed and approved the
long descriptions for benzene, mixed xylene, toluene and methanol.   We have
also finalized the form of GTC's for EPC (who trades benzene, xylene and
toluene) and are forwarding them to you for further distribution.

Note:  GTC's for Enron Clean Fuels Company (who trades methanol) will follow
on Wednesday.

Thanks.
Nony Flores
Ext. 3-7541


Summary

-Yesterday's hearing confirmed imminent death of SoCal MOU
-Plan(s) B also drew little support; state "trust" for generators unlikely
-QF/SoCal negotiations are "treading water" as SoCal runs out the clock;
tries to postpone involuntary filing
-BK court unlikely to view SoCal payments to QFs as preferential because of
state order

Report

1. Few Signs of Legislative Support for SoCal MOU

Sources report that Bryson is in regular contact with many legislators,
but especially with Hertzberg and Keeley on the Assembly side (from which
the Plan B is being directed) and Bowen (Senate Energy Chairperson) on the
Assembly side.  Sources believe that Bryson's comment may about the
legislature 'warming up to the MOU' may be a smokescreen; Democratic Senator
Alarcon said in the MOU hearing yesterday that the MOU is dead and is not
going to pass.  Reportedly no one attempted to contradict him.

Members of the Chamber of Commerce, large energy users,  TURN, the California
Manufacturers' and Technology Association (CMTA) and  others also spoke out
against the MOU.  (Sources found it remarkable that  TURN and the CMTA, who
have been rivals in Plan B negotiations, agreed with each  other in strongly
attacking the MOU.

2. Plan(s) B Are Still Foundering

 The Plan(s) B were not discussed at the hearing, though some of the same
issues came up.  For instance, it was discussed whether it was possible to
transfer all of Edison's obligations to a trust that pays out after the
conclusion of litigation.  In the opinion of the governor's counsel and
other lawyers present, this is "shaky," especially without the consent of
creditors.  In their opinion, there would have to be an agreement that would
pay off everything.

The governor's counsel stated there were constitutional problems with setting
up a trust for what the generators are owed, then letting them litigate over
the trust.  Also, he stated that it was not feasible for the state to be
offering generators cash on the one hand while the FERC negotiated with them
to refund the state for power
purchases (as ordered in the FERC decision Monday).  The governor's counsel
stated that the only reasonable thing for the state to do was to give the
generators their cash, then sue them for it.

3. QF/SoCal Negotiations Are "Treading Water"

 QF sources suggest that the debate between SoCal and the PUC as to whether
the QFs should be paid 10% or 15% of what they are owed is "not a real
question," but rather a stalling measure allowing SoCal to hold on to cash
in advance of a filing or a global solution.  "SoCal is just treading water,"
said a source.

4. SoCal Payments to QFs Unlikely to be Viewed As Preference  Payments

Sources also comment that SoCal payments to the QFs likely would not be
seen as a preference payment in bankruptcy court because they were ordered
by a state agency, the PUC.  However, comments made in the SoCal conference
call yesterday seem to indicate that Solomon Smith and perhaps other
creditors may see the payments this way and may be willing to sign a
bankruptcy petition.


Good afternoon,

I am circulating a draft of the long term agreement for your review. There
are still holes, but hopefully it sets out the basic commercial deal.

Please note that  we are anticipating a Monday meeting.  Therefore, we have
sent this out without the usual internal review.

We hope to have a set of exhibits shortly.

Talk to you soon,

Kay


This is a list of subscription & publication information, compiled by
different regions, regarding developments in energy and broadband.

INDIA
Leena Mathews @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT                06/13/2000 06:23 AM
We do not specifically subscribe for broadband/commnunications related
magazines. News items related to the above are always covered in the business
magazines below. They are equivalent to the Fortune and Forbes

PUBLICATIONS   SUBSCRIPTION RATE  ONLINE WEBSITE
Business India    us $85
10, Pearl Mansion,
91, Maharashi Karve Road
Bombay - 400 020
Tel # 91 22 200 9274/206 9276
Fax # 91 22 200 6669

Businessworld       www.businessworldindia.com

Business Today       www.Business-today.com

Powerline        www.indiapoweronline.com

Indian Infrastructure   US $ 150 (1 yr)
PowerLine, D-4/5 Vasant   US $ 270 (2 yrs)
Vihar, New Delhi - 57   US $ 350 (3 yrs)
Tel # 91 11 615 2322
Fax # 91 11 615 2344
e-mail: powerlin@del2.vsnl.net.in

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ASIA & AFRICA
From: John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/07/2000 02:54 PM

We do not currently subscribe to such trade publications for Asia and
Africa.  We do deal with and monitor a number of publications, but many are
not in English.  Two useful online publications are www.nni.nikkei.co.jp and
www.energyasia.com.

As for major magazines, Nikkei Business is the premier business magazine in
Japan.  In most areas there are major newspapers that are more influential.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++
EUROPE

Iona Maclean@ECT
05/23/2000 03:33 AM
We think that the following are the best publications for you to access (this
can be done on-line)
- FT On-line http://www.business.ft.com/energy_login.html
This site covers all the financial times publications. Enron Europe have a
special deal with FT on-line where everyone can access the service for free.

You can also access the following on-line
- Utility Week and Utility Europe www.utilityweek.com
- The Economist http://www.economist.com/

If you are interested in specific coverage I would be happy to include you in
my distribution lists. Please call me on +44 207 783 5331 if you have any
further questions.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++
LATIN AMERICA

Dennis Vegas@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/09/2000 08:53 AM
International/Regional
Global Finance
Latin Trade
Latin Finance
Newsweek Americas
WSJ Americas
Financial Times (great intl coverage)

Newsletters
Latin America Monitor (online we subscribe for CALME only to Andean Region,
Central America, Caribbean and Middle East editions)
Latin America Power Watch
Latin America Energy

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
JAPAN
From: Michael Grimes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/08/2000 08:38 AM
I'm trying to get a subscription to the Nikkei, which has an electronic site
at:

http://www.nni.nikkei.co.jp/

I also have a free subscription to the PMA news site, which has proved
useful. http://www.powermarketers.com/main.htm

I would call the Nikkei the closest to Forbes in Japan.


Our group has been selling NOV to hedge our short basis position.  Our phys fixed priced liquidity this morning put us in a longer nov nymex position.  We have sold 872 since 11:00 am.

Grigsby


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ONLY

November 11, 2000

To All Parties in FERC Docket No. RP00-476

Subject:  Proposals for Southern's Order No. 637 Meeting

On August 15, 2000, Southern filed proposed changes to its services in
Docket No. RP00-476 in response to the requirements of FERC Order No 637.
As a result of customer comments on its filing, Southern posted a notice of
a meeting with parties that intervened in this proceeding to be held as
follows:

Date:  Thursday, November 16, 2000
Time:  10:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.  (Eastern Time)
Location:  Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta, Georgia, in the Executive
Conference Center, Airport Atrium, Suite 300 (see directions below)

We have a few spaces left at the meeting. To RSVP, please call Ms. Lane
Fletcher at 205-325-7109.

Our goal for this meeting is to gain a common understanding of all the
proposals and to reach consensus solutions on the issues that have been
raised. To facilitate discussion and resolution at the meeting, Southern
provides the following summary of customer comments it received and
additional changes Southern is willing to make in the context of a
settlement of all issues.  If you have any questions about these proposals,
please do not hesitate to contact me (205) 325-3509 or Patty Francis (205)
325-7696 prior to the meeting.

Janice H. Parker
Director, Customer Services
(205) 325-3509
parkerj@epenergy.com

*             *           *            *             *            *
*             *            *              *

Directions to the Executive Conference Center, Airport Atrium, Suite 300,
Hartsfield Airport, Atlanta, GA

1.  After departing from your plane:  Follow the directions to the baggage
claim area.  In the baggage claim area, follow the flow of traffic up the
escalator. Turn right for entrance into the Atrium (an area similar to a
shopping mall) located in the center of the airport between the North and
South terminals.  Inside the Atrium, catch the elevator to the 3rd floor.
The Executive Conference Center is located beside Houlihan's Restaurant.

2.  From ground level:  After your arrival at Hartsfield Airport, come to
the second (2nd) level.   Pass through Ticketing or Baggage Claim and come
to the area where the Car Rental Agencies are located (between North and
South terminals).  Notice signs above for the Atrium (an area similar to a
shopping mall).  Inside the Atrium, catch the elevator to the 3rd floor.
The Executive Conference Center is located beside Houlihan's Restaurant.

*             *           *            *             *            *
*             *            *              *

FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ONLY

Summary of Customer Comments and Southern's Responsive Proposals
Docket No. RP00-476

I.  OFOs AND PENALTIES

Comment 1:  Provide objective criteria for issuing and lifting OFOs
including information that will help customers better understand operational
situation being addressed

Response:  SNG does or will post warnings and forecasts in advance
of OFOs and will work with customers to clarify tariff language on a
mutually agreeable basis

Comment 2:  A $15.00 penalty for Type 3 Alert Mode OFO is not reasonable;
$7.50 is more reasonable

Response:  In the spirit of compromise, SNG would be willing to
decrease the penalty to $10.00 per dth as part of a settlement package.

Comment 3:  The short notice and harsh penalty of the Type 3 Emergency Mode
OFO is unreasonable for the following reasons:
- Customers need more time to make adjustments
o Only implement if a Type 3 Critical Mode OFO
is already in place
o 12 hours notice would be more appropriate
- Limit application to abusive shipper behavior
- Clarify tariff that penalty only applies at start of gas day
and not intraday
- Shorter notice is not justified because if implemented too
late, a firm shipper cannot bump IT on last nomination cycle
- Justify adding the gas price to the penalty
- The increased penalty price is really an increase in
imbalance charges without other benefits
- Use Gas Daily's "Midpoint Louisiana - Onshore South" daily
index price instead of the one proposed

Response:  As part of a settlement package, SNG is willing to make
the following changes to its Type 3 Emergency Mode OFO.
- Type 3 Emergency Mode OFO can be implemented at the start of
the gas day on (i) 20 hours prior notice, or (ii) 4 hours prior notice ONLY
if a Type 3 Alert or Critical Mode OFO is in effect for the previous day;
telephone notice will be given when the penalty is upgraded to Emergency.
- Language limiting the application of each OFO is set forth
in Section 41 of the tariff's general terms and conditions.  SNG is willing
to repeat this language in this specific OFO section of the tariff, however,
so that customers feel comfortable that implementation of this penalty will
be targeted to the operational problem areas on the system or specific
offenders whenever possible.
- SNG will clarify that penalties only apply at the start of a
gas day and can be cancelled during a gas day if not needed due to a change
in conditions.
- Since advance notice must always be given prior to the start
of a gas day (9:00 a.m. CCT), shippers can adjust nominations on the
Intraday 1 nomination cycle (10:00 a.m. CCT) and bump IT.
- At the meeting, SNG will further discuss the reasons its
penalties (including the higher penalty for Type 3 Emergency Mode) are
needed to preserve the operational integrity of the system.

Comment 4:   The change to Type 5 OFOs could result in a shipper in a group
being penalized even if it is within tolerance at a point

Response:  At the meeting, SNG will review an example of how the
proposed changes to the Type 5 OFO will actually avoid shipper-specific
penalties at a point when the point or group of receipt points is within
tolerance.  This provision will only help, never hurt, a shipper.

II.  SEGMENTATION

Comment 1:  SNG currently allows firm shippers to segment their capacity by
rate zone.  It should be operationally feasible to provide more
segmentation, especially along Southern's two main trunklines.

Response:  SNG has reviewed its operational model and has isolated
two "long line" segments of its pipeline along which it could allow
intrazone segmentation in an operationally feasible manner.  At the meeting,
SNG will review the physical attributes of its system that led to this
model.  To be able to provide this level of intrazone segmentation, the
program would have the following attributes:
- SNG will retain its existing segmentation program, but will
layer on top of that the ability for a shipper to fully segment along
identified long line segments of its north or south system up to the firm
capacity that the customer has on the long line being segmented.  For
example, if a customer has north system capacity into zone 2, it can do
intrazone segmentation along the long line portion of the north system
through zone 2 up to its contract quantity on the north system.
- On the long line on which the shipper has firm capacity, the
shipper can nominate to primary or secondary delivery points so long as the
nominations do not overlap along the long line segment.
- The shipper will have to path its receipts and deliveries
for the portion of its nomination where it wishes to do intrazone segments.
This allows SNG to verify that segments do not overlap.  The first delivery
point being segmented can be served by an upstream supply pool or storage,
but all downstream segments must be served by physical receipt-to-delivery
combinations.
- Allocated receipts serving an intrazone segmented delivery
would have to meet or exceed the segmented delivery to avoid overlapping
segments and qualify for the FT commodity rate.
- SNG is in the process of determining the programming
requirements to add this new, more complex model and will provide an
estimate at the meeting.

III.  CAPACITY RELEASE AND SCHEDULING EQUALITY

Comment 1:  SNG should allow customers to offer and bid on capacity release
deals before each of the four nomination cycles.  (In its filing, Southern
has offered to enhance its capacity release procedures to allow prearranged,
non-biddable deals to be awarded prior to each nomination cycle, but keep
biddable deals awarded according to the GISB standards prior to the Timely
Nomination Cycle.)

Response:  While Southern is not required to offer these additional
options under Order No. 637, it would be willing, as part of a settlement,
to add an offer/bid capacity release opportunity prior to the Evening
Nomination Cycle.  GISB is developing standards for intraday capacity
releases, and Southern proposes to wait until the standards are approved to
offer more flexibility due to the programming complexity.

Comment 2:  Changes that require programming should be implemented as soon
as possible if ready prior to the time estimated by SNG in its filing.

Response:  Southern will implement all changes as soon as the
programming is ready, and it will give 30 days advance notice of the
implementation date.

Comment 3:  Southern should allow releases of FT-NN service on a no-notice
basis as soon as possible.

Response:  As noted in its filing, Southern is in the process of
programming this functionality and proposes to implement it on March 1,
2001.  Southern plans to make its tariff filing in mid-January 2001, and
will host a conference call to discuss the tariff filing in early December
2000.

IV.  IMBALANCE MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

Comment 1:  Customers need more than 3 business days to elect to trade
imbalances because imbalances are not final at the time of the election
deadline.

Response:  Effective December 1, 2000, for November imbalances,
Southern has filed to implement the new GISB standard that gives customers
17 business days after the end of the month to elect to trade imbalances and
to complete the trades.

Comment 2:  Southern should allow customers to use other customers' CSS/ISS
storage accounts to resolve imbalances at the end of the month.

Response:  While Southern is concerned that this may increase the
level of imbalances, in an overall settlement, it would be willing to add
this option, subject to active confirmation by the other customer whose
storage account is used to resolve the imbalance.

Comment 3:  Imbalances and overrun penalties should be based on the lesser
of operational or actual data.

Response:  Southern calculates both an estimated imbalance
percentage (on the last day of the month) and an actual imbalance percentage
and uses the lesser of the two percentages when cashing out imbalances.  On
the overrun comment, Southern bills all volumes actually metered, but fills
up a customer's firm transportation service within a zone prior to billing
IT overrun.

Comment 4:  Cash out revenues in excess of the index prices, less expenses
incurred by SNG for cash out gas, should be credited to the SCRM account.

Response:  Southern does credit all revenues received for cash out
and will provide an overview of the items that affect the SCRM account at
the meeting.

Comment 5:  Southern received comments in support of and in opposition to
the collection of injection or withdrawal fees on the net imbalance resolved
with storage at the end of the month.  It was suggested that Southern should
go further and collect the fee on the daily (instead of net) imbalance
resolved through storage.

Response:  Southern believes that its proposal is reasonable and
equitable for the reasons given in its filing.

Comment 6:  Southern should be required to honor discounts to alternate
delivery points within the capacity path of the point receiving the
discount.

Response:  Generally, FT reservation charge discounts continue to
apply even when alternate delivery points are nominated.  Any limitations on
the applicability of the discount to specific points will be agreed to as
part of the discount and will be set out in the discount exhibit.

[THIS DOCUMENT IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND INTENDED FOR SETTLEMENT
DISCUSSIONS ONLY.  ANY OTHER USE OR PUBLICATION OF THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE
OR IN PART, IS RESTRICTED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS RECEIVED FROM
SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY.]

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************


We trade the following cities on EnronOnline.

In the US we trade the following cities:

Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Washington, DC
Atlanta
Cincinnati
Chicago
Little Rock
Houston
Phoenix
Sacramento

In Europe we trade:

Stockholm
Oslo
Paris
London

In Asia we trade:

Tokyo
Osaka
Hong Kong
Sydney
Melbourne


Rick, attached is draft optional termination language.  Assuming you have no
comments on it, it will be included in the next distribution (to occur after
noon Calgary time).  Please note that we are expecting to receive final
comments (if any) from Royal's in-house by noon Calgary.

Once you and Royal have settled on the bigger issues, please call me to go
through Enron and Blakes comments on your memo.

Received: from mail.blakes.ca ([10.1.100.6]) by gwia.blakenet.ca; Thu, 21 Sep
2000 10:47:49 -0400
Received: FROM postmaster.enron.com BY mail.blakes.ca ; Thu Sep 21 10:36:49
2000 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id JAA10801 for
<wbn@blakes.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:47:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (ene-mta01.enron.com [192.168.63.180]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id e8LEldc19974 for
<wbn@blakes.com>; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:47:40 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: optional early termination
To: wbn@blakes.com, Greg.Johnston@enron.com
Cc: Tana.Jones@enron.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3  March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <OF99A6B066.E89BBFAC-ON86256961.0050D062@enron.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:47:32 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at 09/21/2000 09:45:04 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=862569610050D0628f9e8a93df938690918c862569610050D062"
Content-Disposition: inline

Attached is my suggested language.  The confirms already provide for Market
Quotation and Second Method; the Optional Early Termination provision
should be the only exception for using the Calculation Agent for
termination purposes.  Of course, the Calculation Agent will determine AECO
prices for payment purposes, but that is not related to termination.

Please call.  713-853-5620.  Sara(See attached file: OPTIONAL EARLY
TERMINATION PROVISION.doc)
 - OPTIONAL EARLY TERMINATION PROVISION.doc


I am arriving early to attend a meeting with our copywriters at 11am - please
feel free to attend

Its with David MIckleberg (212 468 3038) at DMBB Advertising, 7th Floor, 1675
Broadway (between 52nd and 53rd St) at 11am.

Following this we move to Sullivan & Cromwell at 14:00.  We (myself and Dave)
are scheduled to return to Houston on the 19:45 CO1927 from La Guardia.

Please give me a ring - I have a Skilling Business Review this morning which
should be over mid afternoon - but I'll ring you at 8:15 your time (just in
case your email is still not working).

L


********************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Turn your Nasdaq trash into cash! Dive into the Nasdaq dumpster
and capture 50-100% profits in just a few days. Don't get
left behind! Click here for your FREE special report:
"The Next 5 Monster Stocks of the NewTech Era"
http://www.changewave.com/a/11/sos27
*****************************************************************
SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
November 29, 2000

Fix your mix

In volatile markets like this one, sectors behave in radically different
ways. Here's what you need to know to find today's best opportunities.

By Michael Sivy

When the economy is purring along, most stock groups rise and fall
together. But amid uncertainty and turmoil, different groups suffer at
different times and rebound with varying delays. That's what's been
happening this year, and investors preparing for 2001 need to examine each
sector independently to find the best bargains and to minimize risk.

Since January, there have been three big divergences in the market. The
first has been between tech stocks and defensive groups. The second has
been between issues with high P/Es and those with low P/Es. And the third
has been between companies with big market capitalizations and those with
small caps.

After many months of leadership, tech stocks peaked in March and have
declined as evidence of an economic slowdown accumulated. Technology
companies began warning that their earnings might fall short in upcoming
quarters, and the entire sector suffered as money managers and individual
investors began reducing their exposure. By Thanksgiving, even the
strongest and most popular tech stocks, including Cisco and Oracle, were
down a third or more from their highs. And even at current levels the
stocks aren't cheap with P/Es as high as 50. They'll be vulnerable to
further declines until it's clear that the economy has completed its
downswing.

By contrast, consumer stocks (which are defensive because they aren't as
tied to economic cycles as tech stocks are) benefited from investors'
flight to safety. After having dropped by a third to less than $60 a share
in March, Procter & Gamble [PG] rebounded 35 percent to $74. And
Anheuser-Bush [BUD] has rallied more than 70 percent over the same period
to $48. Those stocks are now trading at more than 20 times next year's
earnings, so they're no longer exceptionally cheap. But such defensive
issues may still be worth buying to balance a portfolio that has been
overloaded in tech.

Energy stocks have also benefited immensely as a defensive sector, but they
were helped even more by this year's sharp runup in the price of oil.
ExxonMobil [XOM], one of the most conservative international oil companies,
has gained 20 percent since March to $89 a share. I doubt, however, that
oil can remain above $30 a barrel for more than a year or two -- today's
high prices will bring on more supply and an economic slowdown could reduce
demand. As a result, I think energy stocks may have seen the best parts of
their gains.

While constrained supply has pushed up prices in the oil business,
oversupply has done the opposite in telecommunications. Fiercely
competitive phone companies have overbuilt their networks so much that they
have been undercutting each other on pricing and cutting back on further
equipment purchases. The result is that stocks throughout the sector --
from service providers like AT&T [T] and WorldCom [WCOM] to equipment
manufacturers like Lucent [LU] -- have lost more than half their value
since the spring. Statistically, I think stocks in the group are
undervalued by a third, but they still may represent dead money for the
next six months.

These divergences among industry sectors are the most visible symptom of
the roiling market, but they aren't the only one. The largest U.S.
companies have average P/Es in the mid-20s, and the most popular giants
have P/Es double or nearly triple historical levels. By contrast, small
companies -- those with market caps of less than $3.5 billion -- have
average P/Es of below 18.

 From all these cross-currents, two important ideas emerge. At any point
there's likely to be at least one sector that's deeply undervalued. Don't
try to predict the turns -- just buy one or two of the blue chips in the
sector that looks cheapest. Right now, defensive stocks are still in an
uptrend but they're no longer cheap, while the techs are still falling
(their decline isn't over yet). You can either buy good tech values and
ride out any further decline or wait until they look fully washed out. The
other important idea is that high-P/E blue-chip growth stocks are way
overvalued compared with everything else. Of course, those are the stocks
everyone most wants to own. But be smart -- diversify with a value fund or
a fund that holds mid- and small-caps with an average P/E below 20. They're
out there.

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

Earning Releases and Calls
For the latest corporate earnings releases and online conference
calls click on: http://money.ccbn.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


Dee,

I assume that you will go through these documents for benefits/plan issues
and then send relevant ones to Pat this week.  If that is not your plan, let
me know.

Thanks!

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 09:45
AM ---------------------------

Craig Hiddleston@ENRON
10/24/2000 06:58 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter del
Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Connor/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert E Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don
Stevens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Data Room Information - Toucan

The information that we have requested from the Georgia Pacific data room has
been sent to us here in Houston and is available for your review in EB2943.
We are obligated under the confidentiality agreement that Enron has signed to
keep all information provided to us confidential and to return all
information, including any reproductions, at the end of this process.
Therefore, I ask that where possible you minimize photocopying (we have
EB2943 set aside for our exclusive use) and let me know what photocopies you
have made.

Based on the management presentations and other information available we have
changed the scope for our potential acquisition of the GP assets. We will:
Proceed with the Leaf River mill with the expectation of submitting a binding
bid
Perform some additional due diligence to determine whether we should further
pursue the Woodland mill, and
Not pursue the Brunswick mill.

Given the altered scope no work is required in evaluating Brunswick. By Oct.
1st we will decide whether to submit a bid for Woodland. GP still requires
that binding bids be submitted by mid-November and this date will apply to
both Leaf River and Woodland. Regardless of the delayed decision with respect
to Woodland we have little time to understand the issues/risks and to
conclude on the impact on whether Enron would want to own these assets and at
what cost.

We want your feedback as soon as possible so that we can incorporate that
information into the internal management approval process and consequently
the bid(s) that we will be submitting. Our current schedule has the
management approval process beginning on November 9th.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Craig


Suggestions......
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Seaman/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

Pat Clynes@ENRON
01/04/2000 12:46 PM
To: Kenneth Seaman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Industrials

Ken and Robert,
The industrials should be completely transitioned to Robert as of January 1,
2000.
Please let me know if this is not complete and what else is left to
transition.
Thanks,  Pat


Introducing your first SAP Paycheck!

This is the first payroll processed in SAP for all employees paid out of
Corporate Payroll. You may notice some changes in the way information is
reflected on your pay advice, the most common are itemized below.

What,s Different?
? Your +home, cost center will be displayed at the top of the pay advice.
This is your department number as designated in the HR and financial modules
of SAP.

? Any earnings descriptions that start with a +P, represent earning types
reported in the prior period. For instance, if you reported vacation time for
the July 1st-15th pay period, it will be reflected on your July 31st pay
advice as +PVacation,.

? Flex dollars will appear on the earnings section of the pay advice instead
of as a credit in the deduction section. The various benefit deductions will
remain itemized in the deduction section.

? If you transfer between Enron companies during the year, your year)to-date
totals will carry forward to the new company pay advice. Previously, the
year-to-date totals started over when transferred to another company. This
change will provide your total Enron earnings and deduction amounts on your
pay advice throughout the year.  (Note that your W2 at the end of the year
will reflect your earnings by company).

? For salaried employees, any reported exception time (e.g. vacation, sick
day, etc.) will be reflected on the earnings section with hours only, the
related dollar amount will be included in the +Salary, earnings type.

? For any other information or further explanations regarding your payroll
contact the Payroll Call Center at 713-345-5555

Payroll FAQ,s

My paycheck has a line called &other deductions8, what does that stand for?
There is a fixed amount of lines to print deductions on the paycheck.  For
some employees, the number of deductions are more than we have room to
print.  In this circumstance, the system totals all remaining deductions and
prints them on one line ) titled &other deductions8.  The detail of all
deductions can be viewed on the pay advice that is displayed on the intranet
at eHRonline.enron.com.

What do the earnings or deduction codes on my paycheck mean?
These definitions are listed on the Payroll webpage located at
hrweb.enron.com, select Enron Payroll  from the side index.

Why is my overtime not reflected on my paycheck?
Overtime is paid one pay period in arrears, therefore it will be reflected in
the next pay period. For example, if you reported overtime for the
July 1st )15th pay period, it will be reflected on your July 31st pay advice
as +POvertime,.

What is the limit for Social Security (FICA)?
For year 2000 the limit is $4,724.40 on a wage base of $76,200. This limit is
applied to each Enron payroll tax company. Therefore, if you transfer to
another Enron company these limits will start over, however, the total amount
withheld across all companies will be reflected on your paystub. Excess FICA
will be credited to you by the IRS via your tax return.

What federal income tax rate is used for my bonus or when I exercise stock
options?
There is a standard federal income tax rate of 28% for these earnings. This
can be higher if the employee has completed a Supplemental Tax form
requesting a higher rate (this form can be found at hrweb.enron.com , select
Enron Payroll  from the side index).


Attached is the most recent update on the status of brokerage/related
agreements you have requested.   Most agreements have been fully executed
including most recently, ITG-Europe

Reminder: I will be out of the office tomorrow and Monday.  If you have
questions in my absence about any agreements on this list, please contact
Stephanie Panus at 5-4239.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Yes,  I talked to mom last night about the football game, Dallas is her team,
and warned her we three would be coming.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


missing deals

jeff r
buy duke
april
np15
25 mw
165.00
off

jeff
buy reliant
april
25 mw
130.00
sp15
off

jeff
sell mirant
april
25 mw
175.00
np15
off

mike driscoll
buy bp energy
may
50 mw
palo verde
265.00
on peak


no objection

"Robert Kean" <rkean@starband.net> on 04/30/2001 10:00:52 AM
Please respond to <rkean@starband.net>
To: "Phil Kean \(E-mail\)" <kean.philip@mcleodusa.net>, "Doug & Karen Reiman
\(E-mail\)" <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>, "Kathy Wedig \(E-mail\)"
<kat.wedig@netzero.net>, "Steve & Melissa Kean \(E-mail\)" <skean@enron.com>
cc: "Diane Kean \(E-mail 3\)" <dkean@starband.net>

Subject: Our Will

Phil, Karen, Kathy, Steve,

Diane and I are finally getting a will written.  I would like to ask all of
you if you have any objections to being named in the will as executors OR
executing an Advanced Health Care Directive.  An AHCD is document inwhich
Diane and I will state what our wishes are regarding life support.  I have
attached a sample copy for review.  If anyone objects, please reply to me in
the next 10-14 days.  We will be meeting with the lawyer sometime around the
15th or 16th.

Rob

 - Advance Health Care Directive.pdf


Easy there...
Everything will be okay...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	RE: Meeting on July 9th

I will be unable to attend. I'm forecasting a bad mood hitting at about 4:15 on July 9.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:13 AM
To:	Bland, Todd; Dean, Craig; Guzman, Mark; Harasin, Leaf; Linder, Eric; Merris, Steven; Meyers, Bert; Porter, David V.; Slinger, Ryan; Solberg, Geir; Symes, Kate; Williams III, Bill
Subject:	Meeting on July 9th
Importance:	High

There will be a Real-Time Group Meeting on July 9th at 4:30.  We will be discussing new Ferc Rules, Dispute Management, Group Changes and Cuts.
Please let me know immediately if you will be unable to attend.

Thank you,

Bill


I called in for the Finance meeting.

I'm trying to finish up an important document and could never get a half hour
without interruption.  I should be in after lunch.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Dejoun Windless/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000
05:52 PM ---------------------------

ClickAtHomePilot2
11/06/2000 03:26 PM
Sent by: Dejoun Windless
To: Sherry Butler/Corp/Enron, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, LaMetrice
Dopson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Harrelson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Michelle Juden/HOU/EES@EES, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Russell Servat/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ClickAtHome Pilot 2 Program - An Invitation

We are excited to extend an invitation to you to participate in the second
Pilot of Enron's new ClickAtHome program.

You have been invited to participate by your Human Resources department or a
ClickAtHome project member.

The ClickAtHome program is Enron's new innovative program to provide eligible
employees high-speed internet access where available, with a high-end
computer and high-speed internet connection.

If you are interested in participating in the ClickAtHome pilot program,
please read all of the materials below and electronically return the PILOT
Agreement with your consent by stating that you accept the terms and
conditions of the agreement in a reply e-mail to this invitation.

Pilot Kickoff2 11-2.ppt - Details pilot member expectations, commitments, and
a tentative pilot time table.

Terms and Conditions - Program terms and conditions. You will be asked to
accept or decline these terms and conditions before
you order your computer and/or internet connection on the pilot web site.

Employee Election Agreement - Please read. You will be asked to accept or
decline this agreement before you order your computer and/or internet
connection on the pilot web site.

Pilot Agreement - Please return the pilot agreement electronically by
replying to this mailbox (clickathomepilot2@enron.com) and stating: "I accept
the terms and conditions of this Pilot Participant Agreement."  if you would
like to participate.  To sign up for Pilot Two, please return via email by
11/10.

Please note to expect a short ordering period so we can test a high volume at
one time.   If you are interested in participating, you may want to start
considering your hardware and internet service needs now.  Ordering will
begin mid to late November and will end shortly thereafter.

If you have questions, please send them to clickathomepilot2@enron.com.

Thank you
ClickAtHome Project Team


Lou:
I received a call from Aquila this morning for a site visit, so their all
set.  Thanks!
Ben


I don't have copies of anything.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	11/20/00 10:26 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Micron

Can't you just make changes to the one we did for ENA?

Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/20/2000 10:06 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Micron

Tanya,

Will you send me a worksheet?

Thanks!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 11/20/00 10:09 AM -----

	Michael Moulton
	11/20/00 09:56 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Micron

Marie,

Can you put together an ISDA for Micron Technologies.  I hope you had a great
weekend.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Thanks, ,

Mike


Notice No.:  01-169
May 16, 2001

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS

FROM:
M. Dawn Lowe
Vice President and Assistant Corporate Secretary

Re:
Declaring the FTSE Eurotop 100c Options Contract Dormant

At the request of the COMEX Governors Committee, the NYMEX Board of Directors
has voted to declare the FTSE Eurotop 100c Options Contract dormant.  There
has been no trading in this contract for more than one year; and there is no
expectation that there will be interest in it in the future.

The FTSE Eurotop 100c Options Contract Terms and Conditions affect a &Special
Matter8 under the terms of the COMEX By-Laws.  Accordingly, COMEX Division
Members have ten (10) days to submit a petition signed by owners of at least
155 COMEX Division Memberships requesting a vote for the COMEX Division
Members to disapprove the amendments, pursuant to the procedures set forth
under COMEX By-Law 205(D).  Following this 10-day period, if a petition is
not received, or if the amendment is not disapproved, the Proposed Contract
Terms and Conditions and the Rule Amendments will be submitted to the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

If you have any questions, please contact Jay Gottlieb at 212-299-2607.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-169)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


After our meeting with Dell on 10/27, I sent a request to Charlie Ball (works
for Kip) for detailed power data from TXU. Charlie delegated the task of
getting this data to Randy Don Carlos, who has yet to return any of my calls
to update the status of the request.

Charlie Ball left me a message this morning indicating that Randy Don Carlos
was leaving Dell at the end of the month. He indicated that he will get the
information to me as soon as he can. I'm not sure, but it seems that no one
has sent the request to TXU yet. TXU generally will send out data within 1-2
weeks of a request. It has now been 6 weeks since we asked Dell for the data.
Assuming Charlie actually gets someone to send the data request to TXU, we
should get something by the end of the year.

Similarly, Continental has not yet sent over data that they were to request
from HL&P. I talked with someone in Mark's group on 12/4, and she indicated
that they had the data, but their real estate group wanted to review it
before they sent it to us. On this one also, it is unlikely that any
transaction will get done in this calendar year.

Please call if you have any questions.


We are mediating this case on Oct 25. As a result, all depositions have been
postponed.I will let you know if this changes.


Hello!  Hope you get this one okay!  These are lofts from 200-400k.  I will
talk to Louis, but I think if I were you, I would stay under the 300 mark.  I
will call you after I talk to Louis!
Lesley

Click the Hyperlink below to link to and view property listing(s) of
interest. If after clicking the link, your Internet browser does not launch,
right click on the link and Copy the Shortcut.  Then paste the Shortcut into
your browser,s Address Field.

http://hounet.interealty.com/hou/WebMLS/MailView.asp?332893607

http://hounet.interealty.com/hou/WebMLS/MailView.asp?1856033932

http://hounet.interealty.com/hou/WebMLS/MailView.asp?737368013

http://hounet.interealty.com/hou/WebMLS/MailView.asp?143425345

http://hounet.interealty.com/hou/WebMLS/MailView.asp?1142779825


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 06:37
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/12/2000 06:23 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Bonneville: Elec Emergency Putting Water System At Risk; DJ T
ransalta Stops Pwr Sales To Cal-ISO; Questions Credit

13:16 GMT 12 December 2000 DJ Bonneville: Elec Emergency Putting Water
System At Risk
(This article was originally published Monday)

   By Mark Golden
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The Bonneville Power Administration - which manages
the federal hydroelectric generating system in the northwest U.S. - may not
have sufficient water to meet its power and fish obligations this winter and
spring, a spokesman said Monday.
"The way it's shaping up now, we are very concerned. We've had one of the
driest Novembers on record, and a very dry December," said Bonneville
spokesman Mike Hansen.
"Given the situation in California and that we are currently having to run
the system outside of the guidelines established by biological opinion (for
fish in the river), we have some concerns for later on this winter for power
and for fish flows this April," Hansen said.
Due to the strains on the system, Bonneville has told the California
Independent System Operator and northwest utilities that Bonneville can
supply extra electricity only in emergencies where rolling blackouts are
otherwise imminent. Thursday, Bonneville rushed to California's rescue only
after the ISO declared its first-ever Stage 3 emergency, and blackouts were
avoided.
Water in the federal system's main storage reservoir, Coulee dam, is at
1,272 feet. The maximum capacity of the reservoir is 1,290 feet, and the
project is incapable of generating electricity when the water level falls to
1,208 feet.
Even though the current storage level is much closer to full than empty, the
normal operations target something close to a full reservoir by the end of
December. Grand Coulee storage has fallen 14 feet since Nov. 1, during a
time when it is normally rising.
What's more, every gallon of water that rushes through the system's turbines
generates a lot more electricity when it falls from higher elevations than
from lower ones, so Grand Coulee is losing efficiency as it drafts down.
"Drafting at Grand Coulee and Libby dams doesn't mean we won't be able to
meet our obligations for fish flow. But it presents a riskier operation.
Everytime you draw them down, and combine them with cold weather, the
probability of meeting those flow requirements drops," Hansen said.
Normally, Bonneville is able to buy excess electricity from California
utilities during the fall. However, California's economic boom has raised
electricity demand there so much that the state has become a perpetual
importer.
Water levels in Grand Coulee and the smaller federal dams are normally
drafted down from January to April to generate power and make room for the
coming spring snow melt.
"We have certainly been drafting more than we had planned for at this
point," Hansen said.
If temperatures fall so low that regional utilities cannot meet their
customers demand for electric heating, Bonneville will step in to avoid
blackouts. But each time that happens in the early part of the heating
season, it raises the possibility that Bonneville will be unable to help in
February or March.
Bonneville manages its system to achieve many goals: avoiding floods, trying
to improve fish populations, recreation and power, which has the lowest
priority except in an electric supply emergency. The hydropower operator is
pretty much always concerned about meeting those various and often contrary
obligations.
On a five-alarm scale, "We run at about two-and-a-half alarm averaged over
the year. If it gets to be as cold as the weather forecast says, we'll be in
a four- and-a-half or five real quick," Berry said
Bonneville is losing out financially by selling electricity to utilities and
the California. Under its federal tariff, it cannot ask for more than $68 a
megawatt-hour from the ISO, for example, though the ISO usually offers
$250/MWh.
But wholesale market prices skyrocketed to $3,000/MWh Friday in the
Northwest, and they have been running above $250/MWh for more than a week.
Bonneville may find itself buying power in March at extremely high market
levels in a couple of months - because it is being forced to rescue
California so frequently now.
The difference could mean a hundreds-of-million-dollar federal subsidy for
California, even though Bonneville's priority obligation is to Northwest
utilities according to its federal charter.
As a result, Bonneville has also provided the ISO with electricity under
exchange deals, whereby the ISO will supply Bonneville with megawatts at
some later time. Those deals could make the ISO's already strained financial
situation worse if power market prices continue to rise through the winter.
By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com
   (END) Dow Jones Newswires  12-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:15 GMT 12 December 2000 DJ Transalta Stops Pwr Sales To Cal-ISO;
Questions Credit
(This article was originally published Monday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Transalta, an investor-owned utility based in
Alberta, Canada, stopped selling power to the California Independent System
Operator at 6 p.m. PST Monday (0200 GMT Tuesday) because it fears the grid
operator won't be able to pay, market sources told Dow Jones Newswires.
For about eight hours Monday, Transalta sold the ISO 400 megawatts of power
from its Centralia generating station in western Washington state at $1,000
a megawatt-hour, the source said. The 1,000 MW will cost the ISO about $3.2
million.
The cost of producing electricity at the 650-MW Centralia plant is about
$14-$15/MWh, company officials said.
Because the ISO, which manages electricity reliability in the state, was
buying a large quantity of power in the spot market, Transalta questioned
the ISO's credit-worthiness.
A Transalta spokesperson wasn't immediately available for comment Monday.
Transalta could resume sales to the ISO at a later date. Representatives
from the ISO wouldn't comment.
To illustrate just how dire the supply situation in California is, other
power suppliers, including British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (X.BCH)
subsidiary PowerEx, have requested that the ISO secure a letter of credit
from one of the state's three investor-owned utilities before any
transactions take place. Last week, Edison International (EIX) unit Southern
California Edison did just that, issuing a letter of credit to PowerEx for
$23 million.
Steve Maviglio, press secretary to California Gov. Gray Davis, confirmed
with Dow Jones Newswires that he received a telephone call from Transalta
saying the company planned to stop selling power to the grid operator Monday
evening.
The ISO has since called a stage-two power emergency and requested that
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. interrupt about 400 MW of power to large
industrial customers who get reduced rates in exchange for having their
power cut during peak demand periods.
-By Jason Leopold and Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 12-12-00
1315GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Dan, thanks for the message.  I'll send it to Gibson and I'll let you know
what they come back with.

WG

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hyvl, Dan
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Re: Gibson Petroleum CA

 << File: 2001-004misc.doc >>

Walter,
 Let's try the above redline out with Gibson.


looks ok to me-  I've added Joe in case he feels we should, but I don't see a need to cc or hand deliver-  MK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:27 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay; Kirk, Steve; Darveaux, Mary; Rapp, Bill; Porter, J. Gregory
Cc:	'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb
Subject:	Negotiated Rate Cover letter

Attached is a draft cover letter to go with our data responses 1-4 set forth in the November 30 order.  Do we want to CC or hand-deliver to any FERC people?  Pls. advise. thanks, Maria

 << File: NR data response ltr (conf).doc >>


put on calendar, and rsvp.  thanks.
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 02:56 PM -----

	Mark Frevert@ENRON
	Sent by: Nicki Daw@ENRON
	02/06/2001 02:54 PM

		 To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Invitation to the Rodeo - Monday, 19th February

You are cordially invited
to join me at the
2001 Houston Livestock Show & Rodeo
on
Monday, 19th February

with performances by
Lyle Lovett & Robert Earl Keen
performance starts at 7pm

Please RSVP Nicki Daw (x33497)


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		12/8/2000
Task Start Date:	12/8/2000


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 04:23
PM ---------------------------

Julie Hunt <jhunt_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 02/01/2001 01:00:46 PM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject: 2FEB NEWARK TO HOUSTON----ETKT

                                                   SALES AGT: JH/YMFDX2

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  KAY MANN X57566

  DATE:  FEB 01 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02FEB NEWARK NJ      HOUSTON TX     800A    1115A
CO 205     A          FRI   NEWARK INTL    G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL C
                            BREAKFAST                     NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MC DONNELL DOUGLAS DC-10-30/40
                          SEAT UPGRADED 9A

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/LRHLXT

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: LRHLXT
ETKT NBR 005-7024437073
FARE $1020.75
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Steve,

Yes, I read it. I am going to talk about it with Ted Murphy and possibly Rick
Buy.
As you have correctly pointed out, the model validation issues cannot
be handled  internally by Research.

The problem is that everybody is swamped right now with
PRCs and end-of-year issues.

I don't think we shall send our  full  VaR model under any circumstances.
We can offer to sell a reduced version based on RiskMetrics.

By the way, our meeting Tuesday will start at 11:00  a.m., Houston time.

Vince

Steven Leppard
12/18/2000 04:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EnergyDesk

Hi Vince - did you read this email I sent you?  We're waiting for some
guidance!

Shirley - is Vince around?

Thanks,
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 18/12/2000
10:27 ---------------------------

Steven Leppard
11/12/2000 09:59
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Bain/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandip Joshi/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EnergyDesk

Hi Vince

James New from London Risk Mgt has asked me to sign off the computations in
EnergyDesk.com for use in Oslo office's new system.  I'm a little
uncomfortable with this since:
1. Sign off of models is something that I've been brought up to consider to
be the domain of RAC.  They disagree in part (see below), which leads me to...
2. London Research is not the "owner" of Exotica, and we don't necessarily
have the time/resource/expertise to audit Houston Research's code.  Indeed,
can Research group sign off their own efforts?  By definition the originating
group for a piece of code thinks it's OK, or they wouldn't have written it
that way.
3. I'm concerned about Research group code being sold to external clients
without Research involvement.  (I received a query a couple of weeks ago from
an EnergyDesk.com guy, Jan Lillehammer, who said he was planning to sell our
VaR system, and asked if he could have a copy!)

I've tried to emphasise that we support Exotica for internal purposes only,
and that our entire setup presupposes the presence of resident quants on the
trading floor to support the tools that Research write.

Your advice/guidance would be appreciated.

All the best,
Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 11/12/2000
09:46 ---------------------------

From:  David Port @ ENRON
        08/12/2000 19:54

To: James New/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Bain/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandip
Joshi/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EnergyDesk

James

I called and left a voicemail but I thought for the benefit of the CC's on
this, my view is that RAC have never been required to sign off on valuation
methods. The standard models used at Enron, like SPRDOPT and other routines
in Exotica.xls are written by Research and therefore I have always assumed
endorsed by Research. Having said that I do believe firmly that all RAC - MRM
folks should have a deep understanding of the way products are valued and be
able to assess and challenge a method.

I am also happy to provide assistance in the process of designing a method
but I wouldn't want either of us to feel that RAC are in the way of progress
by being embedded in a project plan.

In this instance, given the appropriate documentation, I would imagine the
time taken to assess the EnergyDesk methodology would be very short - what do
you have that I could look at ?

DP

James New@ECT
12/08/2000 12:38 PM
To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven Leppard/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Suzanne Bain/LON/ECT@ECT, Sandip Joshi/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: EnergyDesk

I would like to try to clear up a few things regarding the proposed
implementation of EnergyDesk into Oslo.

I thought that it was a requirement that all valuation engines (and any
future changes to the valuation code) are required to be signed off by
research and RAC before they can be used to value the firm's positions. If
this is true then this is all I am looking to get onto the project plan the
time estimates you need to complete your review process. If there is no
requirement for RAC or research to sign off new or changed valuation engines
then I will trouble you no further.

Thanks James