darling, you must think i am perfectly insane, and i probably am, but i
couldn't possibly sneak out tomorrow, this week is just too insane, can we
please hook up next week? i'm going to LA for work early next week, so maybe
we can lunch or coffee on thursday or friday? and guess the fuck what? i got
an art studio! in SF! and it's cheap! and i can ride my bike there! it's
truly amazing, and i have raphael to thank for having good connections and
this is indeed a very very very good thing cuz it makes me happy......!

-----Original Message-----
From: jdasovic@enron.com [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: RE:

ferget it.  i'm just as swamped.  i don't care if you've got a goddamed
boyfriend and a busy job.  friday we're having coffee.  for 30 rotten
minutes.  you name the place and the time.

hugs and kisses,
jeff

Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com> on 09/06/2000 04:17:16 PM

To:   "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE:

next week would probably be best, as i am swamped with hundreds of emails
and my project/beast... how are you and how is school?

-----Original Message-----
From: jdasovic@enron.com [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:56 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: RE:

i expected as much.  and lunch?

Colleen Silva <Csilva@redsky.com> on 09/06/2000 03:50:49 PM

To:   "'Jeff Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE:

burning man was lofty, writer's conference was total debauchery, of course
i'm famous now...

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 5:04 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject:

did you burn the man?  are we having lunch?  are you famous now?


You should attend if you think you will get value from it.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyn, Jim
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:51 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Generation Asset Valuation

Sure, although I'm probably not qualified to speak too intelligently about physical asset characteristics (I can fake it pretty good, though).  Let me know if you'd like me to attend.

- Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 6:45 PM
To:	Arora, Harry; Meyn, Jim
Subject:	FW: Generation Asset Valuation

Any interest in attending?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bean, Kenneth L.
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Coleman, Mike
Cc:	Stanley, Brian
Subject:	FW: Generation Asset Valuation

Someone from the Marcus Evans training company was looking for an Enron person to attend a course on Generation Asset Valuation and Optimization. A brochure describing the course content and instructors is attached as a PDF file at the bottom of this message. Brian Stanley agreed this looked like an informative event, so we committed a slot for Enron among the approximately 25 participants. We'd like you to suggest who would be the best person to represent Enron in this session.

These courses are interactive and are geared to executives. (Per course brochure, audience is CFO, Sr. VP Generation, VP Asset Mgmt, VP Power Supply, VP Development, Director Market Analysis/Valuation.) Companies represented for this one include Ameren, Cinergy, Duke, Exelon, etc.  The course is being held Oct 1-2, 2001 in the Crowne Plaza, just down the street from our office. The cost would be about $3,600.00. EEOS has paid the fee to hold a place.

The course seems focused on making complex decisions about assets in light of uncertainty and volatility, which might be of some value in assisting ENA with strategy about potential acquisitions. Also, we would get some exposure to what other players in the market are thinking. One speaker is the Sr. VP of Asset Management for Duke Energy North America.

Some suggested criteria for the candidate to attend:

1.   Involved in decisions about valuing Generation Assets based on uncertain future outcomes as opposed to simple discounted cash flow analysis.

2.   Interest in calculating value of asset flexibility, e.g., alternate transmission paths, fuels, etc.

3.   Able to discuss merits of asset ownership vs. other means of access to asset/output (contract, lease, etc.)

Kevin, Don and Mike, I think any of you might find this worthwhile if you have the time. I also would suggest perhaps Mitch Robinson as one who is very clued in on both asset management and how we are using assets (owned by us or others) as part of our business. But I don't know everyone on your side, so I request that you consult with each other and let me know whom you think should attend.

(If for some reason you don't want to send someone, we can cover it from the Operations side at EEOS.)

Call me at x6-7775 if you have questions.

Thanks.
Ken

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Administration  [mailto:administration@marcusevanstx.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:44 PM
To:	'kenneth.l.bean@enron.com'
Subject:	Generation Asset Valuation

Dear Ken:

Attached is the agenda as discussed. Due to the limited available seating at
this late date, I will call you to discuss registration details.

Regards,
Reginald Barner Ext 284

 <<FxPk-HT07-jul31.pdf>>

Katie Winslow
Administration
marcusevans
Phone	: 713.650.6007 x.201
Fax      	: 713.650.0796
E-mail 	: administration@marcusevanstx.com
URL     : http://www.marcusevanstx.com

 - FxPk-HT07-jul31.pdf << File: FxPk-HT07-jul31.pdf >>


Jon Wright (and service list)

At clarification we discussed a possible errata to clarify the last line of
BPA 68 page 2 Section F.1. A.

The sentence reads:  "The LB CRAC does apply to Slice purchases and the 1,000
aMW power sale portion of the REP Settlement, including where power sales are
converted to financial benefits under the Settlement."

the proposed correction is revise the final phrase of the sentence to read:
"..., including where such power sales are converted cash payments calculated
pursuant to Section %(b) of the REP Settlement Agreement."

Section 5(b) references conversion of power sales to cash at the mid-C index
under certain situations. This is the circumstance when the delta should be
calculated off the "CRAC'd" RL rate.

The language change would make clear that the LB CRAC does not apply to a
company that chooses to convert a firm power sale to all  Monetary benefits
under Section 4(1)(b) of the REP Settlement Agreement.  In that event, the
share of the 1000 MW of power turned down by the IOU  taking all financial
benefits is reallocated to the other IOUs in the same jurisdiction and the
companies receiving the power pay the LB CRAC for that power.
The Company taking financial benefits receives benefits calculated using the
38 mills.

Jon-- after you have had an opportunity to review this proposed errata and
the Settlement Agreement, please let me know whether BPA will file an errata.

Others:  If you have questions, please feel free to call or email Scott
Brattebo or me.


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022712.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:   1.00 / Final:   1.18)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  50.90 / Final:  50.08)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Hello Vladi,

Sorry you are experiencing problems entering your time.

Please call me and I would be pleased to walk you through the process on EHRonline.

Thanks.

Constance Charles
Human Resources
x3-5614

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pimenov, Vladi
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:33 PM
To:	Charles, Constance
Subject:	RE: Analyst & Associate Program Timesheets - October 1-15, 2001
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Constance,

I was on vacation from October 4th to October 19th and I didn't submit my timesheet yet. I tried to do it on the HRonline web-site, but the procedure is too complicated.
Is it possible that you or somebody else in the HR department mark the vacation time?
I would really appreciate that.

Thank you.

Vladi Pimenov

ext. 37625

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Charles, Constance
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 1:53 PM
Subject:	Analyst & Associate Program Timesheets - October 1-15, 2001
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

The Deadline to Submit Your Timesheet is 10/16/01 @ 12:00 Noon.

It's That Time Again!

Please enter your time @ http://ehronline.enron.com/.

This memo is a reminder to log onto eHRonline and complete your timesheet.

Remember, you only need to submit your time if you have exceptional time, i.e., vacation, sick, holiday, etc.,
or if your rotation information has changed.  Enron does not track overtime for Analysts and Associates.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Constance Charles
Analyst & Associate Program
Human Resources

Quick Reminder:

 You may receive your present or previous paychecks @ EB 3539A.


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>    Juliann, There is a chance that
the unit under maintenance might be started this evening or early tomorrow.
I will update as soon as I receive the information. Thanks.

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


he wanted to talk about life after the sale of the pipeline, i.e. some people
will be leaving the company (with the pipeline), so he wants me to be ready
to take on more responsibility

-e

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           01/26/2001 09:29 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Look at this web-site for the "Stomp" performance.  It is suppose to be
excellent.  Let me know what you think.

Did you ever find out what Tom wanted?
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 01/26/2001 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel
01/26/2001 09:10 AM
To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

check out this website

stomp is March 20-25
http://www.spahouston.org/


Note new cost limits for building laterals within our existing blanket
authorization (i.e., without seeking a specific certificate).  The $$ is
probably still not high enough to give us ability to build the whole project,
but it may give us some flexibility.  Thanks MKM.
Also, has any one heard from Tino or Dennis in the last week or so?  I left
Tino some voicemails on a question he had left for me, and the name of the
Enron windmill guy, but haven't heard back.  Do we need to schedule a
follow-up meeting with them to talk about turbine availability and regulatory
options, etc? DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/09/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/08/2000 07:44 AM

To: Drew Fossum
cc:

Subject: Re: FERC Daily Actions

This shows new automatic and prior notice $$ limits-   $20.2 million, prior
notice  Project Pueblo

Janet Butler
02/07/2000 05:36 PM
To: Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Bily/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christi Culwell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Diane Eckels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George
Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron, Lou Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lou Hamilton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Blair
Lichtenwalter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva
Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Michael
Smith/Enron@Gateway, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike G
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gina
Taylor/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melinda
Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Van Norden/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donald Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jody
Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michele
Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FERC Daily Actions

February 4, 2000

Regional Transmission Organizations, RM99-2	Noticed change in workshop date
scheduled for Atlanta on April 6-7, rather than april 5-6.
Questar Pipeline, CP00-75.	Noticed Questar's application to terminate transportation
agreement with Northern which has been inactive for ten years.  Northern
agrees as evidenced with signed letter agreement.
Distrigas of Massachusetts, CP00-76.	In a letter order, FERC has authorized a limited
certification allowing Distrigas to install air injection requipment at its
LNG terminal in Massachusetts between February 6, 2000 and March 31, 2000.
Trans-Union Interstate, CP00-47	NOI issued to prepare an environmental impact
statement on Trans-Union's pipeline project consisting of about 41 miles of
pipeline in Louisiana and Arkansas.
Publication of Project cost Limits Under Blanket Certificates, RM81-19, Final
Rule	On February 7, FERC issued a final rule with the new limits  applicable for
construction, acquisition, operation and miscellaneous rearrangement of
facilities under blanket certificate procedure.  Attached is Final Rule with
limits.


kevin, do you have the phone number for Geysa Arujo at the Williams Shrink - Cochrane facility. She called me the other day and I must have taken her number down incorrectly.

Thanks. BT


As I mentioned at the executive committee meeting, we have a number of people
who either have expressed interest in serving on the transition team or who I
would like to approach to serve on the transition team for Bush.  We believe
that a call from you to Cheney may be required.

David Haug.    David will be returning from his honeymoon on Dec 4 and has
expressed a strong interest in serving on the Bush team.
Woody Wodraska.  Woody would like to work on environmental and water issues
and has been in touch with Bush campaign folks in both California and
Florida.  He would appreciate a call on his behalf to Cheney.  Amanda is
aware of his interest and is amenable to his service.
James Steffes.  You know Jim.  He is one of the most creative and talented
people in my organization.  He is familiar with state and federal energy
regulation as well as the state and federal policy makers who have played an
active role in deregulation efforts.  He would be great to have on a vetting
team for commission nominees.  I have talked to Jim and he is interested.
Others.  We can make another 4 people available from the government affairs
organization with qualifications in energy, communications and market
regulation.  The question is more a matter of how many Enron people they
would like to have.  Among them:  Dan Allegretti (who will be chair of NEPOOL
next year) who campaigned for Bush in New Hampshire; and Sue Landwehr, a
republican who works for us in the upper midwest.

Linda Robertson has suggested that we try to put as many people on the
"vetting" team as possible.  Let me know how I need to proceed.


Tanya,

No problem.

Vince

Tanya Tamarchenko
12/12/2000 01:28 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tanya's vacation

Vince,
I was going to take afternoon off this Thursday.
Is it OK?

Tanya


cool, thanks, you made me smile


It is still on Chris Hilgert's desk.  I will bug him to get it back to you.  Sorry for the delay.

-----Original Message-----
From: Holtzman, Staci
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: CSA

Gerald - where are we on getting the CSA (as amended) executed?


I am due to get the revised Risk Management reorganization groupings this afternoon.  At that point, additional cost centers may need to be set up so it will probably be the first of next week before any transfers could begin to happen.

Given that it will be the third week of May at that point, the effective date will probably have to be June 1, 2001 for SAP cost center reporting (correct)?  In any event, to enable us to have as clean a cut-off as possible for financial reporting purposes, I would like to wait and make these moves effective July 1, 2001.  That way their existing cost centers are pure for a full quarter and the new cost centers start off clean in a new quarter.  This will also help us from a planning perspective in developing a clean go-forward budget for these groups.

This will have no impact on our financial reporting, we will simply allocate costs to EWS from EES, rather than EES receive a charge from EWS for the entire second quarter.

Unless I hear strong objection to this, we will work toward a July 1, 2001 cutover.

Wade


J, are you logged in?  MSN shows that you are not online.  Do you have the Vet's number handy?  ILY, K.


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: Calpine - SERC Meeting
Report Total: $178.10
Amount Due Employee: $178.10
Amount Approved: $178.10
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Processed

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


2/2000

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The report named: Power West P/L <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=28&report_name=Power+West+P/L&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/16/2001>, published as of 10/16/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)


The attached document shows my proposed changes to Universal's agreement in
redlining.  I tried not to over-lawyer or make this overly complicated, but
in my view this needed a lot of basic cleanup.  Many of my changes are simply
to make the language more accurate (for example, in the use of defined
terms).

In a couple of places, I have questions:  1) In the second opening paragraph,
I don't know whether it is possible to attach the Proposal as an exhibit; if
not, ignore my change.  2) Section 4.a.  -- their provision for an adjustment
seemed a little unusual to me but it could work in favor of either party, so
I left it in.  If you don't like it, let me know.  3)  In Section 5, I just
tried to simplify the billing procedure in case of termination.  Let me know
if this does not agree with your intent.

Please call me with your comments, and let me know how you would like to
proceed.

SS
(713) 853-0596


Haleyville Vetinary Hospital
Attn: Ricky
4545 Newburg Road
Haleyville, AL  35565

Thanks baby.
PL


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 06112

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please accept this invitation, as it will automatically populate onto your calendars.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
x36143


Jeff,
This is really a grid reliability program directed by the CA ISO under stage
3 emengency, it is therefore not dependent on whether the customer is
receiving "energy" product from PG&E the utility or other ESPs since everyone
is a user of the grid for transmission services.  My understanding is that
the only way to avoid curtailments is to get certified by CPUC as "essential"
end-user.  I think recently the BART train system successfully lobbied the
CPUC to certify it as essential.  Of course it will be a tough sell to do the
same for a private enterprise.  Realistically the only way to cover such
non-econcomic driven interruption is to put in on site back up generation.

Ress


Here are this week's survey results.

AVG            +108
AVG w/o High & Low  +107
Median              +108
Standard Deviation    9
# of Responses        57
High           +130
Low            +89
Last Year           +46

Thank You!

George Ellis
BNP PARIBAS

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


Steve - Mark asked me to forward this message I received from Ed Smida
(Blockbuster team).  Paula
---------------------- Forwarded by Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron on 03/05/2001
04:00 PM ---------------------------
From: Ed Smida@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/04/2001 01:30 PM
To: Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Blockbuster media statement

FYI

----- Forwarded by Ed Smida/Enron Communications on 03/04/01 01:29 PM -----

	Kelly Kimberly
	03/02/01 11:48 AM

		 To: David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard
DiMichele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Frank Bay/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed Smida/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Blockbuster media statement

Attached are three versions of standby statements on our Blockbuster contract
and sets of questions and answers, albeit with many missing answers.  NONE OF
THESE IS A NEWS RELEASE TO PROACTIVELY ISSUE.  THEY ARE TO USE ONLY IF
ASKED.  The statements are:

1. For use immediately, should someone ask about contract status. It is
basically a "discussions are confidential" statement.

2. If word of our renegotiations is too broadly leaked, we may have to
consider a different statement so we're not put on the defensive.

3. If and when we cancel the contract.  It would be preferable to offer a
joint, amiable statement with BB so we don't go to war in the media, but
this  statement assumes that we'd have our own.

We need to deal with versions 1 and 2 shortly since Blockbuster continues to
make comments (like at the Kagan conference this week, where Antioco said we
won't extend the trial due to small movie selection.)

And we need to think about responses to the types of questions that we expect
to receive.  Please send me your comments by early next week.


R 203857

I  234938


Marie,

Will you please keep me in the loop about information on Master netting agmts. (list of masters, who is working on them, status, ect.)

Thanks,

Nidia A. Mendoza
Credit Specialist
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith St.,  Suite 2808 D
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  713/853-4868
Fax:  713/853-9476
e-mail: nidia.mendoza@enron.com


TECO TAP                     120.000/ HPL IFERC

LS HPL HATY                   30.000/ ENRON


Brian,

Do you have an Email address at home?
I shall send you directions.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mihura, Brian
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 2:33 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Drinks on Sat

I'll be there!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Mihura, Brian; Corteselli, Gina; Corey, Paula
Subject:	Drinks on Sat

What about drowning our sorrows on Sat, around 7:00 - 7:30 (at my home)?

Vince


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Anita L. Dupont
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Oct. Admin Asst's Meeting
Report Total: $47.59
Amount Due Employee: $47.59

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


This request has been pending your approval for  3 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079989&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079989
Request Create Date : 12/26/01 9:53:43 AM
Requested For       : brian.redmond@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


>2001 Haas School Faculty Alumni Colloquium:
>Saturday, May 5, 2001 - 8:30 am to 2:00 pm
>
>FREE ADMISSION TO ALL HAAS STUDENTS, FACULTY, & STAFF
>  **RESERVATIONS REQUIRED** (see details below)
>  [DEADLINE: April 27, 2001]
>
>
>KEYNOTE:
>The keynote speaker, Patricia C. Dunn, AB 75, Global Chief Executive
>Officer, Barclays Global Investors (BGI), will discuss "Investment
>Management in an Era of Individual Retirement Planning". Barclays Global
>Investors is the world's largest institutional investment manager and the
>largest institutional investment manager and the largest provider of
>structured investment strategies, including indexing, tactical asset
>allocation and quantitative active strategies. After 30 years, BGI
>continues its history of performance through innovation by focusing on the
>three dimensions of Total Performance Management: return, risk and cost.
>
>Dunn's remarks will be followed by four faculty-led sessions touching on
>Economics, the California electricity crisis, the National and Bay Area
>economic and real estate outlook, and organizing the knowledge worker.
>
>
>AGENDA:
>
>8:30-9:00
>Registration & Coffee
>
>9:00-9:15
>Welcome and Introduction:
>Laura D'Andrea Tyson, Dean
>
>9:15-10:00
>KEYNOTE ADDRESS
>Patricia Dunn, BA 75, Global Chief Executive, Barclays Global Investors
>Investment Management in an Era of Individual Planning
>
>10:00-10:15
>Break
>
>10:15-11:30
>SESSION I
>A. Faculty Speaker: Michael Katz
>Does the New Economy Need a New Antitrust?
>
>B. Faculty Speaker: Ken Rosen
>The National and Bay Area Economic and Real Estate Outlook
>
>11:30-12:45
>Lunch
>
>12:45-2:00
>
>SESSION II
>A. Faculty Speaker: Severin Borenstein
>The California Electricity Crisis: Are Policymakers Learning the Right
>Lessons?
>
>B. Faculty Speaker: Homa Bahrami
>Organizing Knowledge Workers: Perspectives from Silicon Valley
>
>2:00
>Conclusion
>
>
>REGISTRATION:
>
>Name:
>Degree Class Year:
>Job Title:
>Company:
>Day Time Phone Number:
>Fax Number:
>Preferred Email Address:
>
>*Confirmation sent by email and fax only*
>
>Preferred Mailing Address:
>Street Address:
>City/ State / Zip Code:
>
>Guest Name(s) & Job Title/Company (if applicable):
>  YOUR GUESTS MUST PAY REGISTRATION FEE:
>$35 (if register by April 27); $40 (late / on-site registration)
>
>
>~Please note which section you will attend in each session~
>Session 1:
>[  ]  Section A - Does the New Economy Need a New Antitrust? (Katz)
>[  ]  Section B - The National and Bay Area Economic and Real Estate
>Outlook (Rosen)
>
>Session 2:
>[  ]  Section A - The California Electricity Crisis: Are Policymakers
>Learning the Right Lessons? (Borenstein)
>[  ]  Section B - Organizing Knowledge Workers: Perspectives from Silicon
>Valley (Bahrami)
>
>
>  **Includes session materials, networking roster, and boxed lunch**
>
>  Reservations accepted by:
>  FAX (510/643-0531) or via
>  EMAIL at alumni@haas.berkeley.edu.
>
>You may also mail your registration form below to:
>Haas School Alumni Relations Office,
>520 Student Services Bldg. #1904,
>Berkeley, CA 94720-1904.
>If you have any questions please contact the Haas School Alumni Relations
>Office:  510/ 642-7790 or email alumni@haas.berkeley.edu.


Mark Doggett Shower


MidAm advised us they intend to call the enforcement hotline, probably today,
to get enforcement staff involved in resolving the Carlton timing problem
(i.e., the absence of an order approving or not approving the settlement).
If Midam does so, Enforcement will then contact Northern for a
response--probably Dari or MKM or I, but who knows who they'll call.
If they do, the following bullets are important to convey as our preliminary
response to MidAm:

1.  Midam, and all of our customers, are aware that a Commission order on the
June 2, 2000 Settlement is necessary before the precise flow obligation for
this Nov-March period can be determined.  The flow obligation for sourcers
like MidAm will be slightly higher--by about 3%--if the settlement is
approved.  For all customers that have asked what the precise flow obligation
numbers would be under the two scenarios, settlement approval or settlement
non-approval, we have given that information.  We gave that information to
MidAm also.  We can't file the tariff sheets setting out the specific number
for this heating season until the Commission addresses the settlement.

2.  The true financial impact of the current uncertainty on MidAm is
minimal.  We believe many of the sourcers have locked in their supply based
on the lower flow obligation number, but with an option to increase their
purchase quantity if the Commission approves the settlement.  MidAm may have
done that, but we don't know.  If not, and if the Commission approves the
Settlement, their only real "cost" would arise if they have to buy the
additional flow obligation volume--about 1100 MMBtu/d for MidAm--now at a
higher price than they would have paid if they bought it earlier when they
locked up the bulk of their flow obligation supply.    Given the large drop
in gas prices the last several days, there may not be any increased cost.

3.  The bottom line is that we really need an order on the Settlement.  The
majority of Northern's customers support it as a fair solution to the Carlton
problem.  MidAm is the only opponent that has raised substantive issues.
MidAm is clinging to a financial windfall it gets under the old Carlton
mechanism and has no reason to oppose the settlement other than preserving
that windfall.

That's the end of the proposed script.  The last bullet may go to far, but I
like it.  Frank and Steve, MKM suggested that you guys get Doering and Gorak
and others to call FERC (hotline or otherwise--I don't think it matters) and
express their concern that the order is not on the agenda.  DF


The following article appeared in today's Chronicle.

Jan. 25, 2001, 10:59PM

Enron rating setup irks many workers
By L.M. SIXEL

TONGUES ARE WAGGING at Enron Corp., and it's not because of the bonuses
they're expecting next month.

Employees are irate about a new performance-review ranking system that pits
them against each other.

Under the system, nicknamed "rank and yank," employees will be put in one of
five categories: 5 percent will be identified as "superior," 30 percent will
be labeled "excellent," 30 percent will be called "strong," 20 percent will
be labeled "satisfactory" and 15 percent will be called "needs improvement"
or "issues."

An insider said "needs improvement" means "you have one leg hanging out the
window." And "issues" is Enron lingo for "you're gone."

The rankings, whose names reportedly took Enron officials hours to come up
with, are not based just on performance.

Instead, they compare employee against employee.

"It is possible, therefore, for someone to perform at the same or higher
level compared to prior periods, yet receive a lower rating for the current
period if other employees' performance raised the bar," according to a memo
from Chief of Staff Steven Kean and Executive Vice President Cindy Olson that
was distributed this month.

While employees are competing against each other for ratings, they're also
expected to be team players, according to the memo.

`Horse-trading' of rank denied
The problem, according to someone familiar with the new system, is the
horse-trading that goes on when the rankings are divided up.

Managers trade rankings like baseball cards, explained the insider, offering
to downgrade one employee if they can get a better rating for another
employee.

An employee's ranking is more a function of the negotiating skills of the
manager he is working for, the insider said.

Olson, who's over human resources and community relations, said no
horsetrading is going on. The rankings, due out this week, aren't set in
stone, she said. Only 9 percent of employees were rated in the bottom
category while 6 to 7 percent were labeled superior, she said.

But Olson said she can see how employees might be worried about the prospect
of bargaining.

She speculated that one reason employees might worry is because it's a new
system for about 60 percent of Enron's employees. In years past, only the
wholesale energy services group was ranked this way.

Some human resource managers expressed surprise that Enron, which is known
for hiring superstars, apparently feels that it must get rid of so many
employees -- or at least put them on notice that they're not doing well.

It doesn't say much about the confidence of your recruiting system if you're
getting rid of 10 to 15 percent of your work force each year, said a human
resource manager in Houston who asked to remain anonymous.

Some may not fit in
Some people, as smart and talented as they are, just don't fit into Enron's
culture, Olson said. It's a company that doesn't tell people what to do; you
have to know what adds value, she said. Some folks just have a hard time in
that environment.

After thinking about it for a moment, Olson added that maybe Enron's
recruiters aren't doing a good enough job weeding out the people who wouldn't
do well in an entrepreneurial environment.

Forced ranking systems were popular several years ago. But they fell out of
favor, in part because they were seen as damaging employee motivation.

Several years ago, Houston Lighting & Power put in a forced ranking system,
dividing all employees into four groups, with "1" the top group and "4" the
lowest. Employees were so angry with the system that some work crews had
T-shirts printed: "Don't ask me -- I'm a 3."

Olson said she doesn't see a problem with motivation. People like to know how
they stand and will work hard to reach the top category, she said.

But many of the employees -- at least the ones who rate above satisfactory --
won't know how they're rated. Managers don't have to reveal the ratings.

And as for figuring out what it takes to be superior? You've got to reinvent
your job, add new business lines or create something totally new.

"Employees understand that when it's explained to them," Olson said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To voice comments, telephone 713-220-2000 and dial in code 1002. Send e-mail
to lm.sixel@chron.com.

Return to top

 Click on banner for more information


The approval process initiated in 1998 for all meeting and event expenditures
in excess of $5,000 has enabled ENA to better assess the business value of
events, accurately track our activities and save money.  These events include
customer and employee meetings, and trade shows.

ENA has made some modifications to the process, which are described in this
memo.

The $5,000 threshold remains in effect for all customer events.  However, the
threshold for approval for employee meetings and events has been lowered to
$2,000, and some additional requirements must be met prior to approval.

Please be sure to follow the procedures described below for all meetings and
events, so we can continue to successfully manage these events.

1) Prior to making any commitments to customers or vendors, all customer
events with anticipated costs in excess of $5,000, and all employee events
with anticipated costs in excess of $2,000 must be reviewed by the ENA Public
Relations (PR) department and approved by the ENA Office of the Chairman

2) The PR department will handle the site search and hotel contract
negotiations for all such events.  Once this is completed, the PR department
will work with you to plan and produce your event in its entirety; or they
can provide as much or as little assistance as you require. The PR department
will be responsible for helping you achieve the best value for your program
and ENA.

3) A completed expenditure request form (see attached) and supporting
documentation is required for each event.  Employee meetings require a
detailed agenda as part of the event documentation prior to approval.  Please
submit the completed expenditure request form and documentation to the PR
department at EB 3642, or work with PR department employees to complete the
form.

4) After PR review, the expenditure will be submitted to the ENA Office of
the Chairman for final approval.

Additionally, the PR department can assist in the procurement of tickets for
various local sporting events and concerts.

If you have any questions regarding this process, would like assistance
planning an event, or need tickets for a Houston event, please contact Dorie
Hitchcock in the PR department at (713) 853-6978.

Thank you for your cooperation.


Reminder to send the 20/20 document list to all the denver office.  Ask them
to review and let us know if any agreements are missing.  Thanks.  Shonnie


j
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 11:38 AM -----

	Rosemary Ryan <RRYAN@isda.org>
	03/31/2001 09:53 AM

		 To: "'alan.aronowitz@enron.com'" <alan.aronowitz@enron.com>,
"'martin.chavez@kiodex.com'" <martin.chavez@kiodex.com>,
"'LClemmons@elementre.com'" <LClemmons@elementre.com>
		 cc: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 Subject: ISDA 16th AGM

A quick note to remind you of the location of ISDA's 16th AGM and the time
for your presentation.

Presentation time:   Developing Products
   Thursday, April 5 at 2:15 PM

Meeting Location: Omni Shoreham Hotel
   2500 Calvert Street, NW
   Washington, D.C. 20008
   Phone:  202 234 0700

I have attached the final agenda for your information.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks and regards,

Rosemary
212 332 2555
 <<Final AGM agenda 3.30.01.doc>>

 - Final AGM agenda 3.30.01.doc


Gerald,

The PSC held a pre-hearing conference today on the territorial dispute. It
was uneventful. The Hilgert testimony was admitted as Exhibit 14 to WFEA's
submission. WFEA sought a delay, Gulf opposed. No delay was granted.

Bill


Here are the points the gas is to be nomintated at for September by supplier:

Williams:
El Paso   15,000
Lomax Sterling  4,500
Delhi Cayanosa 5,500

Apache(by Cynergy):
Delhi   6,000
Lomax Sterling  14,000

(per Nancy Stivers)

She is to send me the nomination once complete.

Thanks,
Mark
x33396


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001 07:29 PM -----

	Holly Keiser@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/02/2001 06:33 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janette Elbertson@ECT, Mark E Haedicke@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mark Taylor - Pager Number

Mark Taylor has a one-way messaging pager.

to leave a numeric message:  1-877-855-2081

To send an email message:  8778552081@pagenetmessage.net

Thanks!
Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Have you asked Karry Kendall about this meter?

Jackie Young
04/12/2000 02:38 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: February and March 2000 Meter 5688

Daren,

Is Fred's below concern something that you might be able to help us with?  I
was thinking that (maybe) the volumes from this meter might belong to HPL.
This is one of the meters that no longer go thru King Ranch.

Thanks
-Jackie-
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2000 02:37
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
04/11/2000 10:29 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: February and March 2000 Meter 5688

Jackie:

Meter 5688 is incorrectly scheduled to the HPL Liquids contract
012-41970-02-002 in March 2000.  Also last month when you were out, Robert
removed the volume from the Liquids contract at this meter and temporarily
put it on a Strangers Gas contract.  If you could fix both months today and
let me know when it is corrected  I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Fred

Fred Boas
02/16/2000 04:35 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita
Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 1/2000 Meters 5688 & 5801

Jackie:

I am new at the 3 Rivers allocation so bear with me, I took this over from
Anita Luong.  In January 2000, and going forward, please make sure that
Meters 5688 and 5801 are not scheduled on the HPL Liquids contract
012-41970-02-002.  The contract is currently out of balance by the total
volume at these two meters so if you could fix this by early tomorrow morning
I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Fred


Sheila,

I have jury duty on Wednesday.

ckm

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 02/12/2001 03:19 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Staff Meeting and GE Conference Call

I am OK with changing the time of the call if that makes the most sense.  Kay
should be available for the call.


The Supreme Court hearing for the case in India regarding the alleged
improper bidding and award of the Panna/Mukta block concluded today.  Our
legal team's opinion is very optimistic based on the way the proceeding
progressed and also on the actions of the chief judge during the concluding
arguments of the case today in India.

The panel of three judges will now take approximately 2 months to write their
opinion and that should complete this case.  While I probably shouldn't
speculate on the outcome, I will summarize my opinion of the important
points:  1) there is little doubt that the Panna/Mukta award to
Enron/Reliance/ONGC will stand, and  2) it is highly unlikely that the judges
will request the PSC to be renegotiated, the contract was portrayed and
generally accepted by the panel as a very fair deal for the GOI.  According
to my general counsel, Stephen Wallace, the only concern our team has is that
the judges were quite critical of the CBI (the government group that
investigated Reliance for wrong doing in the bid process) during that portion
of the testimony and there is a possibility that they could request an
additional investigation.  Our team puts the likelihood of the judges
ordering a new investigation at less than 50%.  There is downside to such a
decision in that it creates uncertainty, but the focus would be on Reliance,
not Enron.

Enron was very prepared on the commercial and the legal front and our team,
as expected, carried the load for this case even though we were not the
primary defendants.  Enron presented the major rebuttal to the CPIL
assertions because the others were not prepared and then later "coached" the
others to help them prepare appropriately.   This was a much more intensive
case than people were assuming it would be last year and we were very
fortunate to be extremely well prepared and well represented.

Based on the above information,  I do not think this issue "CPIL lawsuit"
should  impact any future decisions we make regarding the Panna/ Mukta/Tapti
assets.  This outcome basically eliminates one of the two issues impeding the
progress of  the  project I showed Joe, our proposal to sell
Panna/Mukta/Tapti, that we call Project Janus.  We believe we have a unique
opportunity to realize exceptional value for these assets through an
arrangement with our partner.  The strategy we have mapped out should  allow
us to close the transaction prior to year-end and it has very positive cash
flow and neutral financial implications (minimal if any gain due to the
step-up last year) for the company.   The only remaining hurdle is a tax
issue that we are currently working.

jeff


Departure:	February 9th at 9:20 a.m. arrives Denver 10:40 a.m. (flight #799)

Return:		February 16th at 4:35 p.m. arrives Houston 7:55 p.m. (flight #1098)

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


No Failures


Good Morning,

Exciting News!!  We now have a new Portland Web based IT incident & tracking
application to replace the existing Westdeskitissues.mde Access application.
The new Web based solution adds several key enhancements that will hopefully
improve IT response time and improve our communications back to you when
problems are resolved.

Here are some of the key enhancments:
1.  Ability to query outstanding & resolved issues.
2.  IT problem/resolution knowledge base.
3.  Web page that displays important IT contact information.
4.  Automatic email notifications to resolution team members.
4.  And much, much, more.

For those of you who may be new to the office, or may have forgotten about
the old Westitissues.mde application.  This application is continuously
monitored by the production support team for infrastructure (PC's, Monitors,
terminal-server, LAN, WAN, etc) and application (Enpower, Portcalc, CAPS,
etc.) problems or enhancements requested by users.  This database is also
summarized to capture metrics which are then used to evaluate the performance
of the IT group.

Here are the steps to using the new West Desk Problem Tracking System:

New Login:

1. Go to http://westdesksupport/
2. Click the Login button towards the bottom of the page.
3. In the UserName Box, Enter:  ITWD.
4. For the Password type in: Password.
5. On the next Screen, fill out all the information. (Only certain fields are
required, but filling out everything is preferable)
6. After Clicking the submit button, you are going to be asked to login with
the new username and password you created in the New User Area.
7. Upon submitting, you will come to the main index page.

Adding a WorkOrder:

1. On the Main index page, click on the link add incident to log under the
heading of West Desk Links.
2. Fill out as much information as possible. For IT Contact, please enter
appropriate contact, or if you are not sure, select mtully.
3. Select Priority. (This may be changed by IT)
4. Submit form.

Note: For the description and response fields, you may use html tags for the
formatting of text for display.

The rest is pretty self explanatory. If you hover your cursor over a link or
picture or text box, a texttip will appear and tell you what that link or
textbox is for.

Thanks,

Mike Tully
Trading Floor Support

P.S. When entering a incident, there are two different types of "NEW
Requests". One is New Request (Problem). This is used for reporting an error
or problem with an application. The other is New Request (Enhancement) which
is used for requesting an enhancement to an application.


How did everything go this AM?  I hope well.  Today is you're first day of
class, right?  Have a good day.  I love you.

D


WorldEnergyOnline is happy to provide you with a free trial subscription to
Restructuring Today until December 12.

Restructuring Today has distinctive industry news and exclusive analysis --
and at only $487 for over 250 issues each year, we consider it a bargain.

Act before December 15 to receive $50 off!

Check it out, and if you'd like to subscribe, just hit "reply," and enter
your billing info, or just call 781-939-2423.

You can also find a subscription coupon on the back page of the newsletter.

Requires Acrobat Reader 3.1 or higher, available free at:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader

( ) YES, I WANT TO SUBSCRIBE TO RESTRUCTURING TODAY IN PDF FORMAT FOR ONLY
$437/year. ($50 off the regular price for subscription orders placed before
December 15).

( ) I WANT A CORPORATE SUBSCRIPTION TO RESTRUCTURING TODAY.  The price is
$974 for the basic 5-reader site license, and $121.75 for each additional
reader.  A universal site license for up 100 readers is $4000.
             ( ) I want the basic site license plus ______ additional
readers. Total = $______
             ( ) I want a universal site license at $4000 for up to 100
readers

NAME:

TITLE:

COMPANY:

BILLING ADDRESS:

PHONE:

EMAIL*:

( ) PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME SAMPLES IN THE FUTURE (Please Reply to this message
and type REMOVE in the subject line.

(*For receiving Restructuring Today)

NOTE: This subscription offer is for first-time customers only -- current
subscribers to Restructuring Today are not eligible to renew their
subscription or order a site license through this offer.

To be removed from future mailings of this nature, please REPLY to this
message and type REMOVE in the subject line.
0000038188


We received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 10/9/01 from the referenced CP.  A copy will be scanned into Livelink.


Jeff,

Following my discussion with Bob Hall earlier today, we've changed the two
desk-to-desk tickets to reflect the full 100% volume - 14,100 Mmbtu/d on
Tennessee and 18,400 Mmbtu/d on Transco.  A set of six tickets - 3 for each
deal - is attached.   Please enter these tickets into Tagg and Sitara, or
advise me if you require additional documentation.  Thanks.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
10:04 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           11/28/2000 08:50 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron,
Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation

Turtle Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 58 #2 Well
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 514800, Transco Zone 3

Kent Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 11 #1, 24 #1 & 28 #1 Wells
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 820010, Tennessee La. Zone 1

1)  Is this deal done?  No, not yet.  Cabot is reviewing our new Enfolio long
term contract and has suggested some minor modifications.  Also, this new
long term contract form is awaiting final Legal Department approval - we
expect this imminently.  Finally, our reservoir engineers are scheduled to
visit Cabot's offices on 12/5/2000 to review their downhole data - we will
not enter into a long term contract until a full reserve review has been
completed.
2)  What is the firm quantity?   The quantitiy should be fixed.  For
December, the firm quantity on Tennessee is 11,280 Mmbtu/d, or 80% of the
14,100 Mmbtu/d we expect to flow.  The firm quantity on Transco is 14,720
Mmbtu/d, or 80% of the 18,400 Mmbtu/d we expect to flow.  We intend to keep
the desk whole on these firm quantities.
3)  Who is communcating with Cabot from a logisitics/volume management point
of view?  We expect to communicate with Cabot from a logistics/volume
management point of view.
4)  Why are we nominating ( instead of ENA Upstream) and which group is
responsible for balancing on Tenn and Transco?  We intend to do whatever is
necessary to get the gas to pipeline pooling points and thereupon turn it
over to each Desk's logistics team.  We do not see the need to duplicate our
existing logistics function.

Scott Neal
11/27/2000 06:57 PM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron,
Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation

Turtle Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 58 #2 Well
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 514800, Transco Zone 3

Kent Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 11 #1, 24 #1 & 28 #1 Wells
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 820010, Tennessee La. Zone 1

1)  Is this deal done?
2)  What is the firm quantity?   The quantitiy should be fixed.
3)  Who is communcating with Cabot from a logisitics/volume management point
of view?
4)  Why are we nominating ( instead of ENA Upstream) and which group is
responsible for balancing on Tenn and Transco?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           11/27/2000 06:26 PM

To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation

Turtle Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 58 #2 Well
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 514800, Transco Zone 3

Kent Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 11 #1, 24 #1 & 28 #1 Wells
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 820010, Tennessee La. Zone 1

Victor,

Are you guys nominating/confirming this gas on Tennessee Passkey and Transco
Transit for December or are we?  We expect that as the deals are entered into
Sitara, you will be asked to nominate and confirm this gas.

Are there going to be two sets of tickets for each deal (one for the firm
volume and one for the swing)?  We'll need those deal numbers when you have
them..  Actually, we've prepared 3 deal tickets for each deal.  One ticket is
for the 80% firm purchase (first of the month index pricing) from Cabot by
Upstream, the second ticket is for the 20% spot purchase (gas daily pricing)
from Cabot by Upstream and the third ticket is the desk-to-desk transaction
in which Upstream sells the 80% firm volume to the East Desk - this is the
ticket which will generate origination to the Upstream Desk, if applicable.

Are you scheduling this internally in Unify or are we?  You are.

George x3-6992

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           11/27/2000 05:56 PM

To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation

Turtle Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 58 #2 Well
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 514800, Transco Zone 3

Kent Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 11 #1, 24 #1 & 28 #1 Wells
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 820010, Tennessee La. Zone 1

George/Sandy,
Are you guys nominating/confirming this gas on Tennessee Passkey and Transco
Transit for December or are we?
Are there going to be two sets of tickets for each deal (one for the firm
volume and one for the swing)?  We'll need those deal numbers when you have
them..
Are you scheduling this internally in Unify or are we?
Please let me know as soon as possible as noms for December 1 are due to the
pipelines by 11:30 this Thursday morning!  THANKS!

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           11/27/2000 04:37 PM

To: Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron,
Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation

Turtle Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 58 #2 Well
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 514800, Transco Zone 3

Kent Bayou Field
Continental Land & Fur 11 #1, 24 #1 & 28 #1 Wells
Terrebonne Parish, LA
Facility 820010, Tennessee La. Zone 1

Sandy,

Attached are the tickets we intend to submit to document the two (2) deals
with Cabot for December.  Once you and John have had an opportunity to review
these tickets, Melissa and I would like to come down and walk them through
the system.  Thanks.

Cabot has agreed to do the December deals at index minus $0.01 for 80% of
their volume and gas daily minus $0.01 for the remaining 20% of their
volume.  We expect that they will soon execute the long term paper providing
for index minus $0.005 for the 80% firm traunch and gas daily minus $0.005
for the 20% spot traunch; a set of new long term tickets will be prepared and
submitted upon execution of the long term paper.

If this mechanism of documenting our deals works, we intend to submit all
future deals in a similar manner.

George x3-6992

Attachment deleted
11/28/00 @ 10:17 am

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
04:12 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sandy Olitsky                           11/27/2000 11:07 AM

To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cabot Quotes Dec Only

George:

Scott Neal gave me the following quotes for your December only volumes:

Transco Zn3 WH: Index +.01 minus IT feeder to Ste. 65
Tenn. ZL500:  -.01

Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks.
Sandy


See attached as discussed.

We will visit in the morning.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Thursday, December 7, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Wells Fargo
 Do your business banking online, anytime, anywhere. See
 balances, move funds, track deposits, and get 24/7 customer
 service. Get more time for your life with business online
 banking:
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=232132

"You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap." --
Dolly Parton

BANK OF AMERICA TIGHTENS CREDIT
The company also issued a fourth-quarter profit warning
yesterday.

By Chris Rugaber

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) lowered its earnings guidance for
the fourth quarter yesterday, due to increased write-offs of bad
loans. The company also announced that it would not renew $20
billion in corporate loans over the next two years. It is the
second time in the past month that the company has reduced its
fourth-quarter profit projections.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank now expects
fourth-quarter profits of about $1.4 billion, or $0.85 to $0.90
per share, down from last year's $1.23 per share and below
estimates of $1.17. As recently as September, estimates for the
fourth quarter were $1.35 per share. Earnings projections were
also reduced for next year, from $5.46 to $5.10 per share. The
company plans to write off between $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion
in bad debt this quarter, almost triple the third quarter's
total of $435 million. Bank of America's shares fell about 10%
yesterday, and other bank stocks declined as well, including
Citigroup (NYSE: C), Chase Manhattan (NYSE: CMB), First Union
(NYSE: FTU), and Bank One (NYSE: ONE).

Last month, the company indicated that a loan of $500 million --
widely believed to be held by the Sunbeam Corporation (NYSE:
SOC) -- is "nonperforming," meaning it is not paying interest.
In addition, Bank of America holds loans to companies such as
Owens Corning (NYSE: OWC), which filed for bankruptcy October 5
as a result of asbestos litigation, and ICG Communications
(Nasdaq: ICGXQ), which filed for bankruptcy on November 14. The
company also lent to Regal Cinemas, which defaulted on its bank
debt last month and is considering filing for bankruptcy.

Bank of America seems to have a negative outlook at this point.
"We're pessimistic about the economy, we're pessimistic about
the capital markets and the ability of companies to refinance,
and it's very easy for companies to throw in the towel,'' said
Chief Financial Officer James Hance at an investors' conference
yesterday. "We're taking a very conservative outlook.''

Part of that conservative outlook was announced later yesterday
when the company said it would not renew about $20 billion in
loans over the next two years. CFO Hance noted that "We are not
interested in renting out our balance sheet to clients who are
not delivering us additional fee-based business." The move comes
after Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan urged banks on
Tuesday not to overly tighten their credit standards.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Motorola (NYSE: MOT) greeted investors this morning with an
earnings warning, stating that it will not meet earlier revenue
and earnings guidance. The company blamed delays in cost-cutting
measures in its personal communications segment and "slowing
market conditions" for its semiconductor products. Motorola now
expects fourth-quarter sales of $10 billion and earnings per
share of $0.15, down from earlier guidance of $10.5 billion and
$0.27, respectively. In a press release the company stated that
it "continues to expect robust growth in the global wireless
telephone market, with unit sales in the range of 525-575
million in 2001, up from an estimated 420 million units this
year, and expects to fully participate in that growth." The
company announced additional manufacturing outsourcing
yesterday.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232133

Hasbro (NYSE: HAS) may soon be a has-been (sorry). The company
warned last night that it will at best break even this year, and
may post a loss of $0.10 to $0.20 per share, thanks to slowing
sales, particularly in trading-card games. Hasbro also said it
will sell its Hasbro Interactive and Games.com divisions to
French company Infogrames Entertainment for $100 million in cash
and stock. The company was expected to earn $0.43 per share this
year, and pulled in $1.42 per share last year.

Internet-commerce consultant Scient (Nasdaq: SCNT) announced
last night that its fiscal third-quarter earnings would come in
below expectations, and that it would cut 460 jobs. The company
cited slowing spending among its clients -- which included AT&T
(NYSE: T) and Chase Manhattan (NYSE: CMB) -- on Web services and
growing competition from management consulting firms as the culprits.

The world's fifth-largest media company, News Corp. (NYSE: NWS),
said that it has initiated a hiring freeze in order to control
costs as advertising revenue growth slows. President Peter
Chernin said he expects the U.S. ad market to be "tough" over
the next couple of quarters. Yesterday, other news organizations
such as Dow Jones Inc. (NYSE: DJ) and Knight-Ridder (NYSE: KRI)
also cited slowing ad sales as a reason behind their negative
announcements. Dow Jones reduced earnings projections for its
fourth quarter, while Knight Ridder said it would lay off as
much as 2% of its workforce.
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

What do Warren Buffett and a wine critic have in common? It's
more than good taste.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232134
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232135

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232136

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232137

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232138

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232139
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232140
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232141
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232142
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232143
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232144

 Sponsored By: Wells Fargo
 Do your business banking online, anytime, anywhere. See
 balances, move funds, track deposits, and get 24/7 customer
 service. Get more time for your life with business online
 banking:
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=232145

17 STOCK IDEAS, ONE REPORT
 Don't miss our best-selling research product, Industry
 Focus 2001. Available in electronic download or hard copy.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=232146

ATTENTION, BIOTECH INVESTORS: NEW INVESTING GUIDE
      Learn to analyze the potential of biotech companies
      with our new biotech investing guide.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=232147

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=232148
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-20105-2000-12-07_9-17-09-3342915_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:23:07(12-07
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 11:59 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:


Cheryl,

The deal was done with one of the California Power Books.  We use the
ECC/RISKMANTRA to book any deal with an Enron subsidiary...not just Canadian
deals.  So, I don't think this deal has anything to do with the Canada
office.  Let me know if you need more information.

Susan

To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shannon McPearson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TAGG Deal NK4420.1

Hi Susan

I am trying to verify the liquidations for financial close and noted that
TAGG deal NK4420.1 entered by yourself
shows ECC (Enron Canada Corp) as the counterparty.

Here in Canada, we do not to deals at NGI-PGE/CG and I do not believe that
the book PWR-NG-LTCA is a Canadian
book.  A review of the audit trial indicates that the counterparty used to be
EPMI.  Is it possible it was changed by
mistake to ECC.

Can you please look into this deal first thing Monday morning as we need to
book the liquidations Monday am for
financial close and let me know what you think about this deal.

Thanks for your help.

Cheryl


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outage contained within is
a forced outage. Your daily delivery will still contain this outage. Any
questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED
ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR
COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF
YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 112001.xls


Start Date: 1/19/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011906.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Ken,

	Please include in your finding that the variance between the consumption data and the SQMD file is minimal. If that is not the case, please feel free to give me a call at 503-807-8959.


Can you do lunch tomorrow?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


eze:

hows the new job?

i got your email from jai.  are we on for yoga tomorrow?

thanks for the scooby snacks (tasty) and stickers (plentiful).  normally i suffer some angst from stickers since i don't want to waste them, but you got me so many that it's not an issue.  did you have fun at the crazy horse?  i was quite drunk and unfocused but had a good time.

	the edge


Nora - I got your voice mail & will try to call you soon - I'm stuck on a
conference call.  I tend to agree with you - this seems to me to be contrary
to our policy.  On the other hand, it also sounds like a request we would
want to make if we were on the other side.

	Nora Dobin@ENRON
	01/11/2001 10:06 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Suresh Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

Mark, what are your thoughts on attached from EOL perspective?  Envera's
proposal is inconsistent with Enron legal policy on punitive, consequential,
lost profit type damages.  Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 01/11/01 09:59 AM -----

	"Harvey, Dean" <dharvey@velaw.com>
	01/11/01 09:56 AM

		 To: "Dobin, Nora (Enron)" <nora.dobin@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

-----Original Message-----
From: Pond, Jonathan [mailto:JPond@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Alderden, Emily; Stockbridge, Edward T; 'Harvey, Dean'
Cc: 'michael.a.robison@enron.com'; 'douglas.s.friedman@enron.com';
'suresh.raghavan@dealbench.com'; 'Biff Pusey (E-mail)'; 'Mike Giesler
(E-mail)'; LeBey, Daniel
Subject: Linking Agreements - Indemnity Issue

Envera still has an issue with the indemnity offered under the Linking
Agreements.  As we discussed in our conference yesterday, Envera cannot
permit DealBench or EnronOnline to disclaim consequential damages that may
be payable to a plaintiff in a trademark infringement action.  Envera is not
seeking to recover Envera's own lost profits or consequential damages, just
those that Envera must pay to a plaintiff in an infringement action.

Envera's request is that a statement be added to the indemnity section
clarifying that any damages awarded in a final judgment or paid in
settlement of an infringement claim be deemed "direct" damages.  Dean stated
in yesterday's e-mail that DealBench, as a matter of policy, does not agree
to such requests.

After some discussion among Envera business people, Envera is uncomfortable
with the position taken by DealBench and Enron on this issue.  If DealBench
and Enron are not prepared to stand behind the trademarks that they so
vigorously protect in the Linking Agreements, then Envera is not prepared to
shoulder the risk that Envera would be required come out of pocket for a
plaintiff's lost profits.  Envera is not able to control the risk that
EnronOnline and DealBench have chosen infringing trademarks, other than by
not establishing the links at all.

If the concern of DealBench and EnronOnline is that they could be required
to pay punitive damages that arise from Envera's misuse of the trademarks,
this eventuality is already covered in the indemnity provision.  Neither
party is required to indemnify Envera for infringement claims based upon any
use of the marks not expressly authorized under the Linking Agreements.

I have attached drafts of the two Linking Agreements, marked to show the
language that Envera would like added to Section 4(c).  Please review the
proposed changes and let me know whether they are acceptable to DealBench
and EnronOnline.  If not, Envera will need to consider whether it will even
establish the links.

Regards,

Jonathan

Jonathan R. Pond
HUNTON & WILLIAMS
Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
951 E. Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
DIRECT DIAL:  804 * 788 * 8598
FAX: 804 * 788 * 8218
MOBILE:  804 * 647 * 7871
EMAIL: jpond@hunton.com

This message is confidential and subject to the attorney-client privilege.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail
and destroy the message and any attachments.

 <<11 Jan DealBench Linking Agreement - H&W.doc>>  <<11 Jan EOL Linking
Agreement - H&W.doc>>
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - 11 Jan DealBench Linking Agreement - H&W.doc
 - 11 Jan EOL Linking Agreement - H&W.doc


Shirley,

Please, register me for this.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000
07:16 AM ---------------------------

Energy Institute <energyinstitute@UH.EDU> on 01/03/2000 01:09:24 PM
To: energyinstitute@UH.EDU
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

Dear Colleagues:
With the passage of Senate Bill 7, Texas is moving forward with electric
power restructuring.  What will the new marketplace look like?  How will it
function?  How will existing business opportunities be affected, and what
new ones are likely to emerge?  Join us for a comprehensive two-day
workshop January 12-13, 2000 that addresses these issues and accommodates
both new and experienced professionals.  Hosted by the Energy Institute at
the University of Houston's College of Business Administration, the
workshop features an introductory day that will refresh participants on the
basics of the electric power market and key aspects of the restructuring
process in Texas and the U.S.  The second day targets advanced issues in
the emerging marketplace and case studies for practicioners.  The workshop
will be held at the Center for Executive Development at the UH-CBA.
Instructors are Ms. Dottie Anderson and Mr. Jim Stanton, each with
extensive experience in the power industry and ERCOT implementation, and
Dr. Michelle Michot Foss, director of the Energy Institute (see
biographies, following workshop details).  To register, return the form
below with your information.  Payment, or an indication of payment, must be
received by January 11.  For more information, contact
energyinstitute@uh.edu or telephone 713-743-4634.  This workshop is
appropriate for new and/or advanced professionals in operations, trading,
marketing, planning, public and regulatory affairs and in related fields
such as law and accounting.

NEW ERA IN ELECTRIC POWER VALUE CREATION
Energy Institute
University of Houston -- College of Business Administration
Center for Executive Development Facilities
Melcher Hall -- Main Campus

REGISTRATION (RETURN BY JANUARY 11, 2000 WITH PAYMENT OR INDICATION OF
PAYMENT)
Workshop Pricing:
Full course, January 12 and 13 -- $950 per person (government agencies and
nonprofits, $475 per person); for groups of 3 or more from a single
organization, $900 per person ($425 for government agencies and nonprofits)
Advanced audiences, January 13 only -- $700 (government agencies and
nonprofits, $350); for groups of 3 or more from a single organization, $650
per person ($375 for government agencies and nonprofits)
Fee includes all workshop materials, meals, refreshments and parking at
UH-CBA.  Sorry, we do not accept credit card payment.  Lodging for
out-of-town participants is available at the University of Houston Hilton
Hotel at your own cost.  You may contact the Hilton at 713-741-2447 for
reservation information.

Name(s) and Title(s):

Organization:

Address:

Telephone/Fax/E-mail for Contact:

Total Payment and Form of Payment:

CEU Credit Desired (yes/no):

WORKSHOP DETAILS
January 12, 2000 -- Principles
8:30 - 9:30 Introduction and Workshop Overview
9:30 - 10:30 Regulatory Framework: National Electricity Reliability Council
(NERC), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and Electric
Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)
10:30 - 10:45 Break
10:45 - 12:00  Operational, Marketing and Trading Basics
12:00 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - 1:30 Texas Senate Bill 7 Overview
1:30 - 2:00 Public Utility Commission (PUC)-Texas Basic Rule Making
2:00 - 3:00 ERCOT Independent System Operator (ISO) Functions and Governance
3:00 - 3:15 Break
3:15 - 5:00 ERCOT Issues By Committee
*Restructuring Policy Development
*Ancillary Services
*Single Control Area
*Settlement/Registration
*Congestion Management
*Standard Interconnection Agreement
5:00 - 6:30 Social

January 13 -- Advanced Application
8:30 - 12:00 Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and the FERC Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR)
Future of ISOs
Status of the NOPR, Public Comments Made
ISOs Under Development: ERCOT, Midwest, Desert Star
12:00 - 1:00 Lunch
1:00 - Case Studies
*Changing Electricity Providers: Town Hall Issues
Bringing together the elements of regulatory activity, market power and
restructuring to the retail level, this exercise allows the participants to
make active decisions as our experimental "town" weighs the option of
separating from its traditional electricity provider and treading the
waters of competition. Our group will assume roles centered around
"regulators," "power marketers," the present "investor owned utility" and
the "town" itself. A town meeting will be convened in which each entity is
allowed to present their issues in an effort to persuade municipal
decision-makers that theirs is the best option. Embedded in the exercise is
the regulatory and operational framework that is built into the modules
leading up to this participatory segment. Frequent references to the basic
materials provided to the workshop participants will be encouraged in the
process of moderating discussions that the workshop facilitators will
implement.
*Congestion Management
Congestion management is one of the most critical components of ERCOT
implementation.  A number of approaches exist for pricing electricity
during periods of high demand.  Each methodology bears important
consequences for both providors and customers.  Workshop participants will
participate in construction of a virtual transmission grid and experiment
with different methods of managing congestion.
4:00 Re-cap, Q&A

INSTRUCTORS
Ms. Dottie Anderson
Ms. Anderson has over 19 years experience in the energy industry with
extensive experience in federal and state regulatory policy analysis and
advocacy on behalf of natural gas and electric companies.  She is currently
President and Managing Principal of consulting firm specializing in policy
development and strategic analysis and planning for the electric and
natural gas industries.  Ms. Anderson served as member of steering
committee responsible for coordinating the stakeholder process in the PJM
restructuring meetings and also actively participated in developing the
governance structure for PJM.  She was a member of  Stakeholder Group that
designed wholesale market rules for Texas in 1996 and currently serves as
one of the Power Marketer Segment representatives on the ERCOT Technical
Advisory Committee and Chair of  the Congestion Management Working Group
developing a congestion management mechanism for use when Texas begins its
retail access pilot in June 2001.  She has participated in  ERCOT Technical
Advisory Committees Ad Hoc Committees on Transmission Adequacy and
Possible Impacts of Future Electric Market Changes on the Independent
System Operator and now involved in the broad-based stakeholder processes
to restructure markets in Texas in response to legislation passed in May
1999.  She also is Chair of NERC Market Interface Committee a Standing
Committee addressing commercial business practices and standards in the
electric industry and their interface with reliability. In collaboration
with ERCOT ISO Staff, Ms. Anderson developed training seminar for
conducting business in ERCOT under the PUCT's Open Access Transmission
Rules and participated as a course instructor on the transition from NERC
to NAERO. She also participated as a course instructor in the annual ERCOT
ISO Operator Training Program. She participated as a member of Government
Interface Issues Task Force, a group participating in NERC restructuring
process by addressing issues related to federal legislation and
participation by Canada in a North American self-regulation reliability
organization.  Ms Anderson is a Certificated Search Conference Manager by
New Mexico State University for completion of training in Designing and
Managing Search Conferences and Participative Design Workshops conducted by
Dr. Merrelyn Emery, Australian National University.

Mr. Jim Stanton
Mr. Stanton has 15 years in the electric power industry, divided between
state agencies, investor owned utilities and power marketing.  His
background in generation, transmission and systems operations has proven
valuable in the constantly changing world of power. Combining a BS in
management with a working knowledge of the commercial electric power
business gives Mr. Stanton a unique view of the operational challenges of
the industry, and most especially, the people who make it work on a daily
basis. Mr. Stanton is a certified System Operator in the Southwest Power
Pool and with the North American Reliability Council. He is currently
involved with policy development in both ERCOT and the Midwest Independent
System Operator.

Dr. Michelle Michot Foss
Dr. Michot Foss has been an analyst of U.S. and foreign energy and non-fuel
resource development and environmental issues for nearly 21 years.  She has
a particular focus on policy and regulatory frameworks for energy
commercialization and energy business enterprise strategy and firm/industry
structure.  Dr. Michot Foss has been involved extensively in research and
consulting on North American natural gas and electric power restructuring
and convergence and development of continental cross-border trade and
related issues.  She is participating in ERCOT technical advisory committee
workshops and committee processes for SB7 implementation.  Dr. Michot Foss
speaks and writes frequently on energy issues and energy sector
restructuring in North and South America, Western Europe, Japan and other
world regions.

ABOUT THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
The Institute is engaged in business and public policy issues associated
with commercial energy development worldwide.  Major portfolio areas for
the Institute are worldwide gas and power market development (with emphasis
on North America, the northern Andes, western Europe, the Black
Sea/Caucasus/Caspian region and East Asia), Best Practices in Energy Sector
Reform, special topics in energy technology and markets and energy
commodity trading and marketing and The Energy Business Enterprise of the
Future.  In addition, the Institute provides research and training
initiatives in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Latin America, China, the NIS
region, and other countries and is developing both a non-degree
professional commercial practices program and an international training
program on oil and gas sector reform and commercial development.  Faculty
members are drawn from Business Administration, Law, Economics, Geosciences
and Engineering.  The Institute is underwritten by leading oil, gas and
electric power companies and consultancies.  With the Center for Global
Studies at the Houston Advanced Research Center, the Institute published
the Guide to Electric Power in Texas as a public service for electric power
restructuring.  The Guide is recognized as one of the most widely used
resources by business and government participants.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CBA Energy Institute
University of Houston
4800 Calhoun, MH320
Houston, TX 77204-6283
(713) 743-4634
fx: (713) 743-4881
email:  energyinstitute@uh.edu
web:  www.uh.edu/energyinstitute