See amounts below:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:18 AM
To:	Saunders, James; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John
Cc:	Thames, Davis; Howard, Kevin A.; Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: tw model - current rev
Importance:	High

Can any of you please give me these simple things?

1.   Balance at 12/31/2001 of the following:
	a.  Gross Fair Value Adjustment                                        $438,766,593.00
	b.  Accumulated Amortization of Fair Value Adjustment         144,597,815.00   Net  $294,168,778
	c.  Associated Deferred Taxes                                          $(102,953,845.00)

2.   Monthly Amortization amount of
	a.  Fair Value Adjustment                                                       $500,000.00
	b.  Associated Deferred Taxes                                               $(175,000.00)
                                                                      Net Income Effect        $325,000.00

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thames, Davis
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 6:41 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.; Hayslett, Rod; Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	tw model - current rev

 << File: TW.model.r0.8.xls >>
Here's the current rev on the tw model, with two key things that I need you all to review for me.  Please don't distribute to the large group until it is reviewed.

First, Lindy I have put the annual strip prices at the bottom of the "rolloff" tab.  Could you fill in the basis spread pricing that would result from this?

Second, Kevin and Rod - I had to give up on the FVA adjustments made in older models, I just couldn't get it.  Here's what I did; please let me know if there is something wrong with the analysis:
?	IBIT has annual FVA subtracted from it
?	Cash taxes are calculated using IBIT - Interest + FVA + tax/gaap depreciation adjustment
?	GAAP taxes use IBIT without FVA; deferred tax is GAAP-cash tax.
?	Net income is IBIT less GAAP taxes (therefore includes FVA amort)
?	Net Plant includes PP&E depreciation + FVA amortization
?	Retained earnings are standard - old RE + NI - Div's.

In the old model there were tax adjustments, pluses & minuses to equity, deferred credits, & current liabs that just didn't make sense to me.  I hope I've captured the theme of FVA (non-cash charge to NI, not deductible for tax) without the complication.  If not I can add it all back.

Best-
Davis


please call after reading
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 01:51 PM -----

	"Steiner, Nolan" <Nolan.Steiner@avistacorp.com>
	12/27/2000 01:30 PM

		 To: "Meier, Peter" <peter.meier@neg.pge.com>, "'shari.stack@enron.com'"
<shari.stack@enron.com>, "'travis.mccullough@enron.com'"
<travis.mccullough@enron.com>, "'william.s.bradford@enron.com'"
<william.s.bradford@enron.com>, "'elizabeth.sager@enron.com'"
<elizabeth.sager@enron.com>
		 cc: "Sarti, Daniel" <daniel.sarti@neg.pge.com>, "Hein, Jennifer"
<jennifer.hein@neg.pge.com>, "Blair Strong (E-mail)"
<rbstrong@paine-hamblen.com>, "Vermillion, Dennis"
<DVermillion@avistaenergy.com>, "'benoit.vallieres@neg.pge.com'"
<benoit.vallieres@neg.pge.com>, "Tracy Ngo (E-mail 2)" <Tracy.Ngo@enron.com>,
"Wilson, Ann" <AWilson@avistaenergy.com>, "'gnbergh@painehamblen.com'"
<gnbergh@painehamblen.com>
		 Subject: FW: footnnote each item under Exhibit B

REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT, ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

Tracy Ngo correctly pointed out volumetric ambiguities on the two original
confirmations between Avista Energy and PG&E Energy Trading.

Let me summarize below:

(1) Avista Energy's original confirmation number 404335 showed Total Volume
of 982,400 MWh's.  PG&E revised the Total Volume to 981,600 MWh.  Avista did
not respond with an affirmation of the corrected volume.  Our records show
that the original volume of 982,400 is correct (there was a leap-year day in
year 2000).  The broker confirm and the PG&E revision seem to be both in
error.  Obviously any new confirm that is written between Avista Energy and
Enron will have the proper Total Volume for the remaining MWh's.  Since this
Assignment references the original confirmation, our counsel recommends
language to be inserted under Exhibit B as stated below (see email from
Blair Strong below).  Will this sort of revision be acceptable to PG&E and
Enron? Please advise.

(2) Avista Energy's original confirmation number 403862 showed a Total
Volume of 14,400.  PG&E accepted the confirm "as is."  The broker
confirmation shows total volume correctly as 876,000 MWh's.  Therefore, both
PG&E and AVISTA screwed up.  HOwever, we acknowledge that the total MWh's
should correctly be as per the broker confirmation.  Again, our counsel
recommends language to be inserted under Exhibit B as stated below (see
email from Blair Strong below).  Will this sort of revision be acceptable to
PG&E and Enron?  Please advise.

To reiterate, we realize that there will be new confirmations between Enron
and Avista.  Enron has traditionally written the confirmations (Enron's
confirm's prevail).  Therefore, the new confirms should be acceptable.  We
would like to see those confirms in advance if possible.

Lastly, time is of the essense.  We are scheduling power already for January
deliveries....therefore, we must act quickly on this assignment so as to
prevent any problems with scheduling, etc.  I suppose that we could delay
the start dates to February 1st, 2001 if necessary.  Perhaps not a big
issue.

Thanks,
Nolan Steiner
Ph: 509-495-8199

-----Original Message-----
From: R. BLAIR STRONG [mailto:rbstrong@painehamblen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 10:53 AM
To: Nolan.Steiner@avistacorp.com
Cc: G. Nick Bergh
Subject: footnnote each item under Exhibit B

A footenote to be added to Item 1 and Item 2 of Exhibit B

Notwithstanding the contents of Confirmation Number _____, and to clarify
any ambiguity, the Parties agree that the total volume that Avista agreed to
sell to PGET and PGET agreed to purchase from Avista during the Term of the
Confirmation was _______megawatt hours.


I just got done looking at the underlying contract language as set forth in
the pro forma service agreement in the tariff and it specifically says that
the max rate would apply unless a discount or negotiated rate has been agreed
to.   My concern with adding the language below is,  could it be argued that
not everyone knew the rate would or could apply at any point, since we just
stated Topack and Needles and if they knew they might have bid a different
rate??

Susan Scott
01/11/2001 02:42 PM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: revised language

After discussions with the commercial group I propose that that redlined
language be added to the attached Dynegy agreement and to the 4 other
negotiated rate agreements we've done.  If there are any objections you need
to get back to me ASAP.


4th Annual Interactive Energy 2001 - CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

Why You Should Participate:

Timing - Utility deregulation in Texas will take place January 1, 2002.?
Interactive Energy 2001 will provide the core issues for discussion that will
shape the year 2002 and beyond in respect to the challenges and solutions
affecting energy companies striving to compete in the newly deregulated
utility industry.

Location - Nestled in downtown Houston, the George R. Brown Convention Center
is the ideal gathering spot for energy IT executives.? Enron, Reliant Energy,
ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, Texaco and Dynegy, among other global energy
companies, set their roots within a five-mile radius of this facility.

Schedule - The Interactive Energy conference management team has devised the
agenda for delegates, who are currently re-thinking their e-business
strategies and B2B exchanges, to explorer the technologies that will continue
to add value for the industry.? The exhibit floor hours are power-packed with
technology demonstrations, luncheons and receptions offering multiple
networking opportunities.

To submit an abstract or for exhibit and sponsorship opportunities, please
visit our newly designed website at www.InteractiveEnergy.com or call me
directly at 832-200-3718.

Sincerely,
Whitney Casso
Director of Marketing
Zeus Development Corporation
832-200-3718
Fax: 713-952-9526
wcasso@zeusdevelopment.com
Greg.Whalley@enron.com


fyi..
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           02/03/2000 01:12 PM

To: Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Opt 60 for 2/4

the OPT 60 contract has been restricted again for 2/4.  I spoke with TCO and
they explained that the notice was posted late (11:15am) due some internal
issue at TCO.  I normally check the notices early am and then again once
nominations has be scheduled.
wges  was=7314 now=0
hopewell was=25500 now=0
cgv1  was=209 now=0

I will need Emporia/Transco to deliver to Hopewell and any markets in oper 1.

thanks
joann


After meeting with Larry Joe Hunter, we will not be granting tagg access to
his group.  They were wanting access to change deals that were booked to the
wrong counterparty.  The problem here lies in that they were wanting to do
these changes in the afternoon while we were calcing.  This is not an option.

Therefore, the resolution is we are responsible for these corrections.  We
must get the deals entered into the system with the correct counterparty
initially.  Our credit risk exposure is the bottom line. If we do not have
all the deals to the right counterparty each day, we may not be receiving
enough money on Letter of Credit from CP's.  FYI, this is going to be a
highly visible area for us to make mistakes.  If we continue to make these
mistakes, we as a group will catch severe fire.  To help us do this
correctly, Bianca will be handing out a revised and updated counterparty list
on a monthlly basis.  We will still have emails sent denoting CP name
changes, I reccomend writing these down on your sheets to keep for future
reference.  If all else fails and there is something you are not sure about,
please call Bianca Ornelas at  5-3782.

If you have any questions, please give me a shout.  Thanks.
PL


Sorry to hear work is so demanding.     Let me hear from you when time
permits.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I had a conversation this morning with my contact at APS re: the Sun Devil Project.  Their #1 concern right now on the project is Enron creditworthiness as it regards building this pipeline.

How do I get them comfortable?
Is there a timeline for getting a credit agency rating on TW?  If so, when?
Should we get Rod Hayslett / Stan on the phone with their finance people?

Please advise asap so I can put an action plan together.  Thanks for the help.

khyatt


Joe,
I am I town and I can meet with you this afternoon, subject to one other
meeting. What time are you available?
Shemin
Shemin V. Proctor


we should probably get tickets tonight.  i will call keneally's today to make
sure they are selling tickets.  who all is going?


Thanks--I'll pass that info on to the employment guys.  df

From: Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/23/2001 03:29 PM
To: "Susan Scott (E-mail)" <sscott3@enron.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Louis
Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Kisluk/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Britt Davis/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Need any law help?

A friend of a friend (Petula Workman) is looking for a part time legal
position.
She is a great lawyer -- was on law review, people who worked with her love
her, but she just wants a part time gig since she is a mom with kid
responsibilities.

She wants to work part-time (20-24 hours/week) preferably employment
litigation, but commercial litigation would work too.

If you have need or know of someone who does, let me know and I'll get her
resume for you.

thanks
kevin hyatt


----- Original Message -----
From: <SUNRISEFISH@aol.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:04 AM
Subject: The Ballots

> According to an unidentified source, a white Bronco has been spotted
> following the U-Haul truck which is travelling from Miami to Tallahassee.
The
> Bronco has an inner tube on the top with a blowup Castro doll tied into
it.
> OJ says he didn't do it.
>     (We got to vote again this morning---did you?)
> Yours truly,
> An Unidentified Broward County Voter


Do you code or approve invoices for goods and services that are processed by the Houston-based Accounts Payable center?
If yes, please read and respond to this e-mail.

On May 1st, iBuyit Payables will be activated for all organizations supported by the Houston-based Accounts Payable processing center (for example, invoices submitted via AP drop box to 600 Jefferson, Houston).  If you code or approve these invoices, the iBuyit Payables project team has important information to share with you about the iBuyit Payables system, training, and the May 1st transition to the new system.

To identify yourself as a future iBuyit Payables Coder or Approver, please respond to this e-mail upon receipt with the following information:
*  Full Name (First, Middle, Last)
*  E-mail address
*  Business unit (For example, Corporate, ETS, EWS, EES, or EBS)
*  Do you code invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Do you approve invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Are you a remote user? For example, do you dialup to access the Enron network? (Yes/No)

This will ensure that you receive important iBuyit Payables information.  Thank you for your response!

Attached is important iBuyit Payables training information:

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Once every few years I hedge my corn crop in Iowa (10,000 Bu give or take).
Is this the sort of thing you are asking about? Needless to say, I don't have
a special account to do this.

	From:  Mark Taylor                           06/21/2000 06:39 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Submit a Pac request and keep Tom posted on when and where.

	Cynthia Sandherr
	09/07/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn
Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Congressman Edwards (D-TX)

Steve:  Congressman Chet Edwards is having a fundraiser in Houston, October
10th, 5:30-7:30 p.m. at Reliant's Bruce Gibson's home in River Oaks (2178
Troon).  Drayton McLane will attend.  They are looking for $1000 to host or
$500 sponsor.  Congressman Edwards has been very helpful with our defense
procurement issues, and we have contributed to him recently.  The
Congressman's main request was to include Ken Lay's name on their invitation
which Ken Lay graciously agreed to do so the Congressman is most pleased.
Thus, the remaining request to attend and give additional money is up to you,
although if we have room in our budget and Ken Lay or Tom White were
available, I would recommend their attendance.


No I didn't - is this to the Scott guy?

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Peoples

Yes...I thought you knew already.  Oct 27th.


Hi all,

     Have been copied on the cruise email exchanges and agree with the July
     time frame reminding all of Dad's usual July 4th Keewatin excursion,
     important or not. Will attempt on my end to garnish feedback from
     those I know who have made the same cruise. My cruise is going
     remarkably well amidst Navy wargames etc.

     See you all at Mom's retirement party!

     Steve

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: More cruise info
Author:  Dasovichd@aol.com at Internet
Date:    11/6/99 1:26 AM

My travel agent is sending me some brochures.  1-800-cruises called back with
more info too.  I will look at it all when I get back and we can discuss.
What about dinner out? Do we still want to do that? If so, dates that work
for you all?

Have a great time at Mom's party next week.  Add my best wishes for any and
all toasts.

Debbie


To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Richard Sanders,
mday@gmssr.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
steve.c.hall@enron.com, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart
Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dennis Benevides, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Murray P
O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Aamodt@Gateway, Jay Dudley, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
From: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT
Date: 11/10/2000 04:00:40 PM
Subject: Fwd: DJ - Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators

Please forward this to anyone I have forgotten.  Thanks.

DJ Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

(This article was originally published Thursday)

     LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Public Utilities Commission
likely won't order generators to refund billions of dollars in windfall
profits from last summer's wholesale power price spikes to utilities and
customers, commissioners told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.

     A Republican commissioner said the PUC knows generators are manipulating
the wholesale power market in California but the commission doesn't have the
"expertise in-house to figure out who it is and how it's being done."

     "Even if we could force refunds, it would take five to 10 years in court
to decide if generators should refund money," the commissioner said. "I don't
think the state is willing to spend the money or the time."

     In addition, the commission is nowhere near deciding whether Edison
International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit
Pacific Gas & Electric can pass on a combined $5 billion in debt to their
ratepayers, the commissioner said.

     A decision won't likely be made until mid-2001, the commissioner added.

     Only PUC President Loretta Lynch and Commissioner Carl Wood support
having generators refund windfall profits to utilities and ratepayers. The
commission's investigation, one of two ongoing probes into the state's
troubled wholesale power market, has been unsuccessful in finding evidence
that would force generators to refund billions of dollars, according to
documents obtained Thursday by Dow Jones Newswires.

     Last week, federal regulators determined generators didn't manipulate
the market. But they did find flaws in the state's market structure and said
rates were "unjust and unreasonable."

     The state's Independent System Operator and Power Exchange have also
concluded they have no evidence to prove generators manipulated the market in
order to drive up wholesale power prices.

     The commissioner said the PUC doesn't support the utilities' efforts to
pass on $5 billion in wholesale power costs to ratepayers.

     The commissioner said "if it came down to deciding tomorrow, the
utilities would be left holding the bag."

     PG&E and SoCal Edison pay about 16 cents a kilowatt-hour for wholesale
power. But the utilities charge their customers far less under a
state-mandated rate freeze.

     As reported earlier Thursday, SoCal Edison President and Chief Executive
Officer Stephen Frank said the utility's inability to immediately recover
more than $2 billion in debt from its ratepayers may force the company to lay
off employees and reduce major capital spending.

     PG&E filed a lawsuit in federal court Wednesday asking a judge to allow
the utility to pass on $3 billion in debt to its customers.

     -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com
     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 10-11-00


Have you been drinking, Kimberly??

Kimberly Bates
04/18/2001 06:58 PM
To: Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Craig
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT
Subject: Pete Keavy

As you Pete's wife just had a baby.  To congratulate them, in my absence Rain
will be collecting money.  Please give her your donatin.  The celeration will
take place next week, another e-mail will be sent with details.

Thanks

K-


got it thanks


I have created two new deals in Sitara.  You will need to get with someone in
Volume Management to reallocate volumes from the old tickets to the new deals
for Jan-Sep.  The Logistics group will be able to adjust October forward.

Deal #s:

144052 --> 440092
144049 --> 440093

Let me know if you have any questions.

D

Tina Valadez
10/16/2000 11:50 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Koch Midstream Services Co

Please change the Sitara tickets dating back to January 2000 and let me know
when you are finished.

Thank You,
Tina Valadez

Daren J Farmer
10/16/2000 11:15 AM
To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Koch Midstream Services Co

Since Koch has told you that they sold the properties to Duke, I would say
that Duke should be paying us for the gas.

I had heard that Koch sold the properties to another counterparty, but I
wasn't sure to whom.  I either talked or left a message with someone in the
settlements area about two months ago about this after Koch informed the
trader that they should not be getting the invoices.  However, I never heard
back from anyone.

This is related to the CES acquisition which came online the first of this
year.  The deal info we had at the time had this sale booked to Koch.  I can
change the tickets in Sitara to the Duke counterparty (or create new tickets)
today if you need me to, so that we can get the invoice out the door.  You
will still need to coordinate with the contract group in getting the correct
contract in place for the deal.

D

Tina Valadez
10/10/2000 10:18 AM
To: Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Koch Midstream Services Co

I have been billing Koch Midstream Services Co under ENA for meters
LL-1-0030-Comitas (Sitara #144052) and LL-1-0027-Volpe (Sitara #144049).  My
former accounting contact at Koch, Michael Thomas, said that Koch sold these
south texas assets to Duke Energy Field Services back in 1999.  Michael faxed
a contract which I forwarded to Cindy Balfour Flannigan in the contract
area.  Cindy said she can't tie the deals in the contract to our system so
she can't recognize the assignment.  Cindy has left messages with Koch, but
she has not been able to resolve the issue.    Koch is refusing to pay for
the gas and there is currently over a million dollars outstanding relating to
these deals.  I need to find out whether Koch or Duke is responsible for
paying for this gas.  Do you have any information regarding this issue?

Thanks,
Tina Valadez
3-7548

---------------------- Forwarded by Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ami Chokshi @ ENRON                           10/09/2000 02:47 PM

To: Tina Valadez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Tina,

With regards ti the Koch Midstream, you could talk to Daren Farmer about it.
Also, Carlos Rodriguez could help.

Ami


Congratulations on your promotion to Vice President.  What a nice recognition
of your contributions to the success of EnronOnline.  --Sally


I worked on the grade level promtion.  I didn't know what her new title was supposed to be. Lynn chcecked with Fran and she told her coordinator.  So I guess we'll have to check back in with Fran
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Attached herewith is the filed Conference Report statutory and report
language for the Department of Defense Reauthorization.  Today, at 5:00 p.m.
EST, The House Rules Committee will meet to formulate a rule on H.R. 4205,
The Floyd Spence National Defense Authorization Act for FY2001--Conference
Report .  The plan is to then vote on both the Rule and the Conference Report
on the House floor tomorrow, October 11th.  The Senate also plans
consideration this week, but they have not yet announced their exact date for
floor consideration (and they are still seeking resolution of the price cap
concerns which could result in a possible filibuster.)

The Conference statutory language and report language is a victory for Enron
Federal Solutions which had been threatened with House language which would
have required a sole source by the local franchise utility.  The House
receded to the Senate language (translation:  the Hefley language was
killed.)  Further, the political compromise reached does not support state
franchise rights; nor does it challenge Federal sovereignty; nor does it
challenge bundling; but it does affirm the competitive rights for non-utility
bidders.

Given the resources employed by EEI and their member companies plus employed
by APPA, NRECA and NARUC, this is a major victory for EFS and the DOD.  By
close of business today, we need to determine whether or not to proceed with
a possible floor Colloquy.

Congratulations to all involved with this successful team effort!

SEC. 2813. CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY REGARDING UTILITY SYSTEMS OF
          MILITARY DEPARTMENTS.

     (a) Selection of Conveyee.--Subsection (b) of section 2688 of title
  10, United States Code, is amended--
     (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``If more than one''; and

     (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

     ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned may use
  procedures other than competitive procedures, but only in accordance
  with subsections (c) through (f) of section 2304 of this title, to
  select the conveyee of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
  under subsection (a).
     ``(3) With respect to the solicitation process used in connection
  with the conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system)
  under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall ensure that the
  process is conducted in a manner consistent with the laws and
  regulations of the State in which the utility system is located to the
  extent necessary to ensure that all interested regulated and unregulated
  utility companies and other interested entities receive an opportunity
  to acquire and operate the utility system to be conveyed.''.
     (b) Applicability of Regulatory Requirements.--Subsection (f) of such
  section is amended--
     (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The Secretary''; and

     (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

     ``(2) The Secretary concerned shall require in any contract for the
  conveyance of a utility system (or part of a utility system) under
  subsection (a) that the conveyee manage and operate the utility system
  in a manner consistent with applicable Federal and State regulations
  pertaining to health, safety, fire, and environmental requirements.''.

                      Conveyance authority regarding utility systems of
military

           departments (sec. 2813)

       The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would amend
   section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary
   concerned to comply with the competition requirements of section 2304 of
   title 10, United States Code, in the conveyance of utility system
   infrastructure. The provision would also require that the secretary
   concerned carry out a conveyance or award only if he determines that the
   conveyance or award complies with State laws, regulations, rulings, and
   policies governing the provision of utility systems.
       The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would
   amend section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that the
   secretary concerned may use procedures other than competitive procedures
   only under the circumstances specified in section 2304 (c) through (f)
   of title 10, United States Code.
       The House recedes with an amendment that would require the secretary
   concerned to structure the solicitation process for the privatization of
   utility systems on military installations in such a manner that would
   allow, to the maximum extent possible, all interested regulated and
   unregulated entities the opportunity to acquire and operate utility
   systems on military installations regardless of franchise rights in the
   area of the installation concerned. The amendment would also direct the
   secretary concerned to require the conveyee or awardee of the utility
   system to manage and operate the utility system consistent with federal
   and state regulations pertaining to health safety, fire, and
   environmental requirements.


Marie will verify this information first thing in the a.m.:

The Duke master is dated August 16, 1999.  It was sent for execution (to
Carol Graebner in Houston) on August 18, 1999.  I cannot verify whether
execution copies have been received by ECT.  Sara


Barry,
 Item 2 of the attached document states that Section 8 does not apply to this
confirmation.  Why can't we change the language to state that Sections 2, 5
and 8 do not apply to this confirmation.  I would prefer to do this in lieu
of changing the standard GTC terms and conditions.  Otherwise, what is meant
by the language "if the replacement price is not representative of the market
price, the parties may agree to use a fixed price in lieu of the index price"?

	Barry Tycholiz
	11/03/2000 02:58 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crestar Document


Please print this monster.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/03/2000 04:54
PM ---------------------------

"FAYE STEDMAN" <STEDF@andrews-kurth.com> on 11/03/2000 04:30:13 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Chris Cobb" <COBBC@andrews-kurth.com>, "PAUL PIPITONE"
<PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com>, "PETER THOMPSON" <THOMP@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: GE Turbine Form Facility Agreement

At the request of Peter Thompson I have attached the most recent draft of the
GE Turbine Form Facility Agreement for your review.  I apologize for the
delay in getting this document to you.

The blacklines will be forthcoming shortly.

Thank you.

 - 554888_5.doc


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 111501R.xls
 - 111501.xls


Tara,

This response was not from me - it was from Ann Hicks in Houston who is the
unfortunate person who receives a large number of mails destined for me
because the sender is careless when sending their message.

Many Thanks

Ann

From: Tana Jones on 07/07/2000 08:36 CDT
To: Anne Hicks/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Anne,

You didn't write any message on your response, so I am not sure if you have a
futures trading account or not.  Is that why you responded to Mark's email?

	Mark Taylor
	06/22/2000 01:22 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 01:22 PM -----

	Ann Hicks@ENRON
	06/22/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Anne Hicks/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

----- Forwarded by Ann Hicks/NA/Enron on 06/22/2000 09:40 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	06/21/2000 06:39 PM

		 To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


<<brief9.15.doc>>
Here is the Seattle/Tacomoa discreet issue brief.  CRA is verifying the
numbers but otherwise, I believe it is ready to go. They will confirm Sunday
morning.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - brief9.15.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 11:40 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
01/26/2001 10:26 AM
To: craiggannett@dwt.com
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, csandhe@enron.com, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: COB Exports denied

From an operational perspective, during a Stage 3 Emergencies, the ISO has
three options available to keep the lights on.   It can (1) buy more power
(under its DOE granted Section 202(c) authority), (2) cut scheduled power
transactions, or (3) derate transmission capacity used to export power from
its system.  The Cal ISO has recently been derating to zero transmission
capacity to the Northwest (option 3).  Because transmission users can't get
capacity to sell their power outside California, the effect is that the ISO
gets cheaper power over customers in the NW.

I was thinking of a political approach to solving this problem.  I was
wondering if you could work with your contacts to mobilize NW Senators (?) to
write a letter to the California ISO and the Governor; you might even get
Steve Wright to sign on given that this  situation must make it more
difficult for him to balance his budget.

The central theme of the letter would point out what a hue and cry there
would be if BPA engaged in such actions and that California is simply  trying
to get cheaper power than the rest of the region.  It could also point out
that the Cal ISO already has the mechanism of the Secretary of Energy's
Section 202(c) orders to get the power it needs for an emergency and that
this order is fairer because it allows market participants to have a just and
reasonable rate determined (albeit after the fact) for the power.  I wouldn't
bring up the ISO's authority to cut scheduled power transactions.  I don't
think we want to encourage that.

What do you think?  Call me.


Part 1 of 3 Parts

Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 11, No. 17, May 14, 2001

Brown Says Longhorns Should Be Very Good
Offensively with Chance for Stout Defense, Too

Coach Mack Brown says the Longhorns will head into the football season with
just one problem on offense and fewer than expected on defense if his young
tackles come through.
In an interview with coach Brown last week, I asked him how the Longhorns
compare with his best teams at North Carolina.
In a nutshell, he said Texas is better offensively than those North Carolina
teams, but is not quite as imposing defensively
His last two teams at North Carolina lost only to Florida State, posting the
best two-year record ever for the Tar Heels, and finishing in the top 10
twice, something Texas hasn't accomplished once in nearly two decades.
"Our offensive line is better here," he said. "We have two quarterbacks who
can play. We had that at North Carolina, too, but our upside is better here.
Our receivers at North Carolina were very good, but the ones we have now can
be the best we've had."
He said North Carolina's fullback and tight end  from his last team there are
still playing in the NFL, but he also noted that UT TE's Bo Scaife and Brock
Edwards, who are only sophomores in eligibility, have NFL potential, too.
He said one big plus offensively at UT is the depth the incoming freshmen
will provide in the line.
"We had good offensive linemen at North Carolina, but we had trouble finding
good ones in numbers," he said.
"We didn't have good numbers here and had to force some guys to play too
early," he said, "but that got them ready to play and now we have  good
experience and good numbers and we hope we can start redshirting our freshmen
offensive linemen. We need to get to that point."
Hesaid the only problem he sees offensively this season is at tailback, and
that isn't as big a problem as it seems because all five of the returnees
competing for the job are competent players and several of them have the
ability to step it up.
And if they don't step it up, there is a young fellow coming to two-a-days in
August who has everyone excited. I've written enough about Cedric Benson that
I won't go through it all again, but he is something special.
If you doubt it, just remember this: Three state championship games in Class
5A at Midland Lee, with five touchdowns in each game. No one else has ever
come close to doing that once in Class 5A much less three times.
Defensively, Brown has high expectations and that's only natural because 10
of the starters and 5 of the backups on his 1997 North Carolina team were NFL
draft picks. Three of his defensive linemen went in the first round.
But he says the Longhorns have some talent on defense and could be very good
if his young tackles come through.
The departures of two-time All-American Casey Hampton and his equally
formidable sidekick Shaun Rogers left a giant hole in the middle of the
Longhorn defense.
They were the run-stoppers deluxe who led a unit that ranked 12th nationally
in rushing defense, yielding 94 yards a game last year.
Eight starters return from a Longhorn defense that also ranked seventh in the
nation in total defense, yielding only 278.3 yards per game.
Brown also said Rogers, who missed several games with a badly sprained ankle
was never close to 100% last year after being injured early in the season.
"Shaun was one of the best players of his size I have seen at rushing the
passer," he said. "When we lost him, it really hurt our pass rush."
I have speculated in previous issues that the Longhorns probably will have a
better pass rush from their front four this season because sophomore-to-be
Marcus Tubbs got 5.5 sacks, second on the team last year, while standing in
for Rogers, and because the defensive ends are a year older and there is more
speed at tackle than before.
Brown said the coaches are counting on a better pass rush from their linemen
"Cory Redding and Kalen Thornton have the potential to be as good as anybody
at defense end," he said. "We have high expectations for them.'
At tackle, he said Tubbs "weighs 285 and he can run. He's got a great upside.
He's a young guy who has played well already and should just get better and
better. We're excited about him."
Brown also said the move of Maurice Gordon from end to tackle "looks like a
good one. He runs a 4.6 and he looked really good this spring. We just need
him to keep on working hard and he'll be a  good one. He's already a good
pass rusher, and he's working on getting stronger to stop the run.
While Gordon is a pass-rushing whiz, the likely starter at tackle opposite
Tubbs is redshirt freshman Stevie Lee if he is able to recover fully from
foot surgery.
Lee played well last year in spots as a true freshman, but was injured early
and was able to get a medical redshirt year, which means he is a freshman
again this year.
If Lee is healthy, Brown said the key for him is off-season conditioning
work. "Stevie can play at about 300 pounds, but he doesn't need to play at
330," he said.
"In this league, everybody spreads people out, forcing the front four to make
off-schedule plays. You can't just be a run stopper anymore. You've got to be
quick enough to make adjustments.
"We're emphasizing speed and quickness," he added. "That's why we made some
moves in the spring, like moving Maurice Gordon to tackle, O. J. McClintock
to end (from linebacker) and Lee Jackson to linebacker (from safety)."
Brown also said sophomore Adam Doiron, who also played well in relief last
season as a true freshman, has a bright future at tackle.
"He needs to get get stronger," Brown said. He's real smart and real tough.
He just needs to get more experience and use the off-season program to get
stronger."
He likes his secondary, saying, "I feel like we are in real good shape with
our secondary. We have guys who have the ability to cover and the speed to
make up ground. We also are two deep in the secondary for the first time
since we've been here."
The area where he wants to see the most improvement on defense is a
linebacker, where all three starters return.
"We have asked our linebackers to step it up," he said. "They have played
really well for us, but we want them to just take an extra step to get even
better."
The Longhorns had troubles with their place kicking in the spring, and Brown
said the returnees and three walk-ons will compete for the starting job when
two-a-days begin in early August.
Summing up, he said the Longhorns' strengths are at quarterback, wide
receiver, tight end, the offensive line, the defensive ends and the secondary.
He said defensive tackle will be a strong position, too, if Lee returns
healthy and all the young players continue to improve.
When asked to comment on the most pleasant surprises from spring training,
Brown said, "Bo Scaife returning and looking like he is ready to play is one.
Kyle Shanahan (a walk-on wide receiver) did some really good things. Derrick
Dockery finally being healthy again was a big positive development."
He said all of the "spin-down" moves the coaches made on defense this spring
are "looking good at this point. We wanted to improve our speed on defense,
and these moves have helped us accomplish that."
Asked about the biggest disappointment in the spring drills, he said, "It was
nobody emerging at tailback. They all played good, but, after Ricky Williams
and Hodges Mitchell, our expectations are very high."
True Orange Observations
Look for the Longhorns to use more one-back formations this season. Why? The
back-up wide receivers and tight ends are more dangerous than the fullbacks.
WR Sloan Thomas and TE Brock Edwards would start and star for many teams, but
they are backups at Texas.
Also, look for a lot more misdirection plays and other plays designed to make
the offense less predictable than it was last season.
* * * *
With coach Mack Brown's first great class of recruits heading into their
third seasons, and two other great classes following it, this is the season
the Longhorns should be able to finish in the top 10 for the first time since
1983.
For those of you who seem to get a little impatient at times, it is worth
noting that the Longhorns have finished in the top 20 just seven times since
1983 and three of those seven times were in Brown's first three years here )
15th in 1998, 21st in 1999 and 12th in 2000.
This Longhorn team probably will start out about fifth or sixth in the
country and it should be able to stay in the top 10 unless some wheels fall
off.
The great thing about the way Brown has built this program is that he and his
assistants recruit great prospects every year, and develop them.
I think this year will start a long string of years for UT  to be contending
for high national honors.
The only way you can win the highest national honor ) a national championship
) is to get to the championship game.
Since only two teams get to the championship game, some very deserving teams
are left out. Miami and Washington, for example, were certainly deserving
last year, but unbeaten Oklahoma and once-beaten Florida State got the nod.
So, having an outstanding team doesn't guarantee a berth in the national
title game.
I won't predict the Longhorns will wind up in the Rose Bowl playing for the
national title this year, but I will predict that Brown will have us playing
in a national championship game very soon.
Teams in the Big 12 and SEC have the extra burden of having to play a
post-season game for their conference titles, which means they have to play
two godzillas back to back to be No. 1.
But great teams can do it and Texas will be a great team in the very near
future. It might not be this year, but it could be if things break the
Longhorns' way.

900 Number Updated Frequently

I update my 900 number at least twice a week with football and football recrui
ting news. The number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be
18 or older to call.


I will check on this, thanks for the info.brad


i'll call

Karen Arnold <klarnold@flash.net> on 02/22/2001 07:57:57 PM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Smith Barney

You must be on the net because you don't answer the phone.  Andy Rowe never
invested that $8000 into the commodity account.  Do you talk with him on a
regular basis?  Should I call?  Please advise..


Please remember to sell off this length on Sunday and Monday.

JMF
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:13
PM ---------------------------

Cara Semperger
11/09/2000 07:46 AM
To: Portland Shift, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Length at Montana System (Colstrip) to be sold on 11/13

Good Morning,

Smurfit Stone is ramping down their plant by 5 mw's beginning at HE 6 on
11/13.  The source for them is PGE@Colstrip.  Please sell off this additional
5 mw's for HE6 thru HE24 on the 13th.

The Smurfit Deal number is 268656.1

The Portland Deal number is  403522.1

The real time position manager will reflect this length.

Thanks,

Cara


Tom,

Please create a spot ticket for gas that commence flowing on 1/14/00 at 8:30
am.  The pertinent information is as follows:

Counterparty   Mtr.   Volume   Price

GMT, Inc.   9814   500mmbtu/d   100% IF/HSC

Should you have any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Daily, Pamela
Cc:	Batista, Daniel
Subject:	RE: Who is Ruthann's supervisor?

they put it in the system as me, but I've told them it was you.

	 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daily, Pamela
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Who is Ruthann's supervisor?


I hope that spelling your name correctly will help this get through to you.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 11:53
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           06/06/2000 03:58 AM

To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, rstevens@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: RE: Letter agreement

Here's the latest from GE.

When I spoke to Rob Stevens, he had a question about whether Mitsui needed to
review the final drafts of the GE agreements. I don't know the resolution of
that issue.

As you know, the current arrangement with GE requires payment within 3 days
of signing of the contracts, which means we have to be prepared to assign the
contract, then wire the money from EEIM to Mitsui immediately so that Mitsui
can pay GE, and GE can refund ENA.  Has EEIM been funded yet and has Mitsui
bought in on the payment plan?

I do not know the status of the tax issues raised by Jeff. I would also like
to make sure that Jeff agrees with the mechanism of superseding the prior
agreement with GE.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 09:54
AM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/06/2000 09:47:54 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com,
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com, David.K.Bargainer@enron.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: Letter agreement

Kay,
I'm faxing to you the documents highlighted in RED, below.
So, it looks like we need to supercede these documents, along with the
assignment and assumption agreement.
I believe the entities I mentioned yesterday are still applicable.
If you have a different opinion, let me know.
Give me a call at 518-385-7722, and let's get the documents in condition to
be signed today or tomorrow.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 3:44 AM
To:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com
Cc:   Kay.Mann@enron.com; jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com;
Brian.D.Barto@enron.com; karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com; john.schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

Thank you.  That would be helpful.
Kay

karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com>  on 06/06/2000
07:28:24 AM
To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com> ,
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com> ,
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com> ,
   David.K.Bargainer@enron.com <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com> ,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com> ,
   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

The "MOU" consists of the GE proposal #80518 w/ offer letter of August 12,
1998, and J.M. Bollinger's (President, Cogen Tech) acceptance letter of
August 14, 1998.  These letters set the framework of the agreement,
including payment / termination schedule.  Invoicing & payments began in
September, 1998..and have continued on that basis until each of the
individual contracts for Linden & "Midwest" were consummated.  In Dec., 99,
at Enron's request,we allocated  funds paid to date to Linden and the "third
unit".  We'll forward copies of above.
Karl Siverling
-----Original Message-----
From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com>
[mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] <mailto:[mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]>
Sent:   Monday, June 05, 2000 6:27 PM
To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com; <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com;>
Kay.Mann@enron.com; <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com;>
karl.siverling@ps.ge.com; <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;>
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com; <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com;>
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com; <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com;>
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

The collective memory at ENA is that there wasn't an MOU per se, just the
assignment and assumption agreement.
Kay

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>  on 06/05/2000
03:51:46 PM
To:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com <mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com> ,
Kay.Mann@enron.com <mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com> ,
David.K.Bargainer@enron.com <mailto:David.K.Bargainer@enron.com> ,
   john.schroeder@ps.ge.com <mailto:john.schroeder@ps.ge.com> ,
jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

Brian,
I spoke to Karl today, and we tried to find the "MOU".  All we have found
was the "Assignment & Assumption Letter" you mention.  In that document, the
Enron and GE entities were; Enron Capitol & Trade Resources Corp. and
General Electric Company, respectively.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]>
Sent:   Monday, June 05, 2000 12:45 PM
To:   Kay Mann
Cc:   karl.siverling@ps.ge.com; <mailto:karl.siverling@ps.ge.com;>  David
K Bargainer;
John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com; <mailto:John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com;>
Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com <mailto:Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com>
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

I have a copy of the "Assignment and Assumption Letter"  where GE agreed
that Cogen Technologies could assign the rights to purchase the Units to
Enron Capital and Trade Resources, Corp.
The initials at the ECT signature block is Doug Pedigo's.
I have always been a little confused when Karl Siverling talks about
voiding
an
MOU, because I do not remember ever seeing an MOU for the Cogen Tech units.
Perhaps we could ask Karl to send us a copy of the document he intends to
void to make the process easier.


Please let me know where we stand on this.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tricoli, Carl
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:25 AM
To:	Tricoli, Carl; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Reeves, Kathy; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Bruce, Michelle; Denton, Rhonda L.; Mills, Scott
Cc:	Racicot, Paul; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Murphy, Harlan; Tweed, Sheila; Sager, Elizabeth; Luong, Steven; Irani, Eric
Subject:	RE: TXU Contract Termination Dates

If possible, please forward these MTM values to me by the end of the day.  I'd like to get back together for a short meeting tomorrow to discuss the values and make plans for next steps.  Tina Holcombe will send out an email for meeting time later today.  Thanks.

Carl Tricoli

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tricoli, Carl
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 2:08 PM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Reeves, Kathy; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Bruce, Michelle; Denton, Rhonda L.; Mills, Scott
Cc:	Racicot, Paul; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Murphy, Harlan; Tweed, Sheila; Sager, Elizabeth; Luong, Steven; Irani, Eric
Subject:	FW: TXU Contract Termination Dates

I am forwarding Harlan's schedule of termination dates for TXU.  Please calculate our MTM values on those dates as soon as you can, and forward them to me.  Thank you.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Harlan
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:37 PM
To:	Tricoli, Carl; Reeves, Leslie; Murphy, Melissa
Subject:	TXU Contract Termination Dates

Give me a call if you have any questions.  I guess the next step is to clean up a few items on the attached spread sheet and then assign a value to each contract.  We need to come up with a plan for factoring in LDs with the MTM exposure.

 << File: TXU Default Log.xls >>


Here is the draft of the needs assessment for global standards.  Please give
me your input.  Kelly is devoting 100% of her time to putting together an
access database to report these standards.

Also, here is a consolidated view of A01 for 12 /04.

Thanks

Shona


I will not be in today. I am not feeling well - sinus drainage, sore throat, body aches.  If you need me, you can reach me at home at (281) 359-6258.  I will follow up with my group to make sure I have everything covered for today and prepared for tomorrow's Customer Accounts Meetings.

Rick


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/26/2001>, published as of 10/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I'm swamped.  I got up at 430 to work this am.  Got here at 7 yesterday so I
could go to the game.

Those young uns recover quickly, don't they?

Still missing you,

Kay

suzanneadams@att.net on 04/04/2001 08:44:16 AM
To: dan.lyons@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, dina.snow@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Wednesday

How are you guys doing?  Nothing new here, I'm just
hanging out recuperating.  I was up all day yesterday
and didn't feel too tired.  Of course the real test will
be when I have to walk a lot!  My incision is still
pretty tender, but I'm sure that's to be expected.  My
waistline has gone down about 2 inches though since I've
lose all that swelling from the infected gallbladder.
You guys won't recognize me when I return (ha)!

Ruthie is recovering from her surgery a whole lot faster
than I am.  She's not yelping any more when she gets off
the bed.

That's about all of my news.  What's going on over there?


Sure, I'll drop it by.
Thanks!

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/16/2000 10:10 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ClickPaper Approvals for 10/05/00 and 10/06/00

I do not believe that statement is correct.  The limitation was required in
the corporate documents of the company, so it should apply to all
agreements.  Can you send me up a copy of the Password Application and I will
give Steve Norris a call.  Thanks.

	Camille Gerard@ENRON
	10/14/2000 12:44 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Cummings/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ClickPaper Approvals for 10/05/00 and 10/06/00

Tana,

We now have an application from Tembec, Inc.   Steven Norris, as Treasurer,
is the one signing the Password Application for Tembec.   When John Cummings
met with him last week, Steve stated that he would be involved in setting up
the users for Physical transactions.

After reading the requirements below, it sounds like the two signature rule
applies to Financial transactions only.

In other words, can we set up Steve as well as his users with Physical access
without two officers' signing?

If so, then we could get them on-line with Physical access and then work on
whatever we need for Financial access.

Thanks for your help!
Camille
36150

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/10/2000 04:28 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper Approvals for 10/05/00 and 10/06/00

On the 10/05/00 List:  Tembec, Inc.'s bylaws require that agreements signed
by the company must be signed by any two of the following officers:   the
President or a Vice President together with any Director, Secretary or
Assistant Secretary.  If you are going to trade with them online you must
ensure that the Password Application gets signed by those officers, or if not
by those officers, they must provide a resolution if any officer except those
above signs the documentation.  Because of this signatory restriction
EnronOnline was hesitant to open them for financial trading.  It's up to your
group, but you must comply with these special signatory requirements.  If you
would like Legal to pass on the documentation if you are unsure, forward it
up to me.


whats your phone number? mine is 832-851-2821

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Belcher [mailto:jbelcher@chemweek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 2:00 PM
To: David Holt; steve blalock; Mark Pulliam; Julia Humphreys; Jennifer
Black; marty allday; Mike Casey; Parks, Joe; Will Hogan
Subject: Fw: Big 12 Championship Day]

I am cleaning out my saved personal emails. This is one you should always
save and pass on to posterity. It is the funniest email I have ever read.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Holt" <holt@mail.motorfuels.com>
To: "Jack Belcher" <jbelcher@phillips.com>; "Mark R. Pulliam"
<mark.pulliam@sabre.com>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 1:24 PM
Subject: [Fwd: Big 12 Championship Day]

> I don't even send 'em unless they're real funny....now read it, and
> remember back in the day....
>


Notice No. 02-04
January 8, 2002

TO:      	All NYMEX Members/Member Firms
		All NYMEX Clearing Members
		All NYMEX Floor Traders
		All NYMEX Operations Managers

FROM:     	George Henderson, Vice President

RE:       	Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
		Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the February 2002 options contract for Brent-WTI
(BWG2) and Brent Crude Oil (OSG2) is Monday, January 14, 2002.

   GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and 299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trade=s adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers ATO@ your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer AFROM@ your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 6:45 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s) at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT             APPROXIMATE TIME          USUAL FAST FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES                       OF MESSAGE           EVENT TIME  E-MAIL
(E)
                                AVAILABILITY                        BOTH
(B)

Announce Out-of-the                       4:45PM            4:45PM
F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21            6:30PM            6:45PM            E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final 7:00PM            7:00PM            F

Announce Exercise/Assignment           7:30PM            7:30PM            B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is          10:00PM           10:00PM           F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


FYI,

Please, take a look at this resume.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000
07:47 AM ---------------------------

Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/21/2000 04:27 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cameron Payne

Vince, congratulations on your promotion.  Hope the litigation lawyers are
leaving you alone.

I'm attaching a resume of a friend of mine, Cameron Payne.  I don't know if
you are looking for anyone but Cameron is pretty special, as you'll see from
his resume.   Call him or me if you're interested in talking to him.  I'm
forwarding his resume to Fastow and Whalley, too, in case they see a fit.
Take care.  Bob


FYI - we will probably be asked what historical information is needed in our
shop from a Logistics perspective. I would suggest asking the new CES
employees to give us a list of what they know we would probably need to deal
with historical questions on pipeline and customer physical imbalances as
well as any other information that helps support some of the large customer
and asset transactions.

Have each of them put together a list that we can consolidate and forward to
the IT folks.

Thanks - Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
07:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Inja Chun                           01/05/2000 01:21 PM

To: Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larrissa Sharma/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Dayao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence R
Daze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT, jpeople@columbiaenergy.com,
Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth S Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Columbia Energy History Data

The following summarizes the decisions made during our  user & IT joint
meeting today regarding the handling of CES historical data.

A.  Bryce Baxter will coordinate with all user groups to identify CES reports
that need to be actually printed as hard copy or transfered to files that
will be accessed               via the Electronic Document Management system.
B.  Jeff Peoples will be working with Bryce Baxter to produce reports using
CES system via ISDN line at Enron building - this will continue to be part of
his duty until  the job is done (Jeff joined ENA as a member of Sitara group).
C.  Larry Daze will be working with Jeff Peoples and Bryce Baxter to ensure
all reports are loaded on our EDMS with proper indexing.
D.  No need for manupulating CES history data is necessary  (i.e. downloading
on spreadsheets).  Therefore, no data will be kept on the disk other than
EDMS.


Dear Market Participants,

The NYISO is currently implementing an upgrade to our security
systems which appears to be affecting your ability to access the secure
part of the NYISO web site.

We are diligently working to improve your ability to access our systems.
This is a temporary problem and we expect your access to be improved
shortly.  We will notify you of any status changes.

Regards,

NYISO Customer Relations
518-356-6060


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
	 [IMAGE]      Sunfinder Vacations Newsletter (02/02)   Dear Subscriber:  We hope that your year is off to a great start!  Book any air-inclusive package to the Bellagio Hotel  in Las Vegas and receive $50 off your final payment. After booking online, just mention the code "Best of Las Vegas" when you call one of our friendly reservation agents to arrange payment. This exclusive offer for our subscribers is valid for new bookings made between 2/11 and 2/28 only.  ===== February Sweepstakes =====  This month's sweepstakes features an all-inclusive stay for five nights at the beautiful Grand Oasis  Resort in Cancun, Mexico. Sound good? Click here to enter .  Congratulations to last month's sweepstakes winner of the El Cozumele?o sweepstakes, Donna G. of Mentor, Ohio!  ===== Vacation Specials =====  Good news! The 2 for 1 Special  for select resorts in Cancun, Los Cabos, and Puerto Vallarta has been extended for bookings through the end of this month. Act soon, though, because room availability is very limited. If you find availability, we'd suggest that you place a courtesy hold on the package. If at first you don't succeed, try different dates if your schedule permits. Click here for more details .  Please check our other vacation specials to the Caribbean, Mexico, and Hawaii at http://www.sunfinder.com/vacation_specials.htm   For Cruise deals, sail on over to http://www.sunfinder.com/cruise/cruise_vacations.php   ===== Quick Links =====  Free Postcards : Brighten someone's day with one of our beach postcards! Cruise Vacations : Great deals on vacations at sea! Farebeater : Find low airfares quickly and easily. Hotel Reservations : Negotiated rates at over 2,000 properties. Discount Car Rental : Find great rates from leading rental car companies. Priceline.com : Name your own price for airline tickets. Sailing & Yacht Charters : Yacht charters from bareboat to fully-crewed luxury. Screen Calendars : Replace your computer's wallpaper with beach scenes. Travel Finder : Find just about anything and almost everything travel. Travel Insurance : Low-cost travel insurance available online.  ===== To Unsubscribe =====  This newsletter is sent only to subscribers and those who have booked travel or created accounts through Sunfinder Vacations and our partner sites. You can  unsubscribe by clicking here ,  or by going to http://www.sunfinder.com/newsletter/unsubscribe.php   and typing in the e-mail address sscott5@enron.com.  ===== Happy Travels! =====  We appreciate your support. Thank you!  Sunfinder Vacations http://www.sunfinder.com/  vacations@sunfinder.com CST#2044781-40


Hi there,

Please get someone to hang my white board behind my door.

Thanks,

Kay


Mark,

The correct distribution list does not have any underscores.

Please use the following.

DL-Portland Volume Mgmt

Thanks - MO

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stokley, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:12 PM
To:	Confer, Mark
Cc:	O'Neil, Murray P.
Subject:	RE: June 01 Flash Report

Mark,
	Could you please add "DL_Portland_Volume_MGMT" to your distribution list for Flash, Desk analysis and DPR.

							Thanks
							  Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Confer, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Allen, Thresa A.; Chang, Fran; Dunton, Heather; Evans, Casey; Law, Samantha; O'Neil, Murray P.; Postlethwaite, John; Ratnala, Melissa K.; Reeves, Leslie; Saha, Rajib; Stokley, Chris; Vinson, Donald Wayne; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	June 01 Flash Report

Attached is the June 01 Flash Report.  The Desk Analysis will be sent later this afternoon.

Thanks,

Mark

 << File: 20001 06 flash Report 72501 .xls >>


Shyam, Cindy Olson would be an appropriate person for you to contact within
Enron.  You can reach her at 713-853-7418.

Thank you,
Joannie Williamson
713-345-7774

"Shyam Giridharadas" <sgiridha@prismintl.com> on 05/11/2001 08:59:12 AM
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Guidance

Hello Jeff

A voice from the past.  Hope you are doing well.

I wanted to gain your assistance to point me to the most appropriate person
I could interview at Enron.  I am helping a client understand how companies
in the US Natural Gas and Power industry are coping with the challenges in
their industry in terms of developing and retaining the "right skills".
So, someone who could provide an external perspective of how players in the
industry are coping with the challenges as well as an internal perspective
on Enron would be great for me to interview.  If that means more than one
individual, that is fine too.

Hope this is not too much of an imposition.  I'll undertake the
conversation over the telephone and keep it short.

You can reach me on email: sgiridha@prismintl.com or on my cell phone:
240-603-6084.

Thanks a lot for your assistance.

Shyam Giridharadas


Sure thing...MLC

   Carol St Clair @ ECT                05/16/2001 02:09 PM

To: Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Please see attached memo...

Marianne:
Thanks for this.  As Elizabeth Sager and I are tag teaming this effort until
I get up to speed on power, please copy her on any e-mails that you send me.
I have forwarded this to her.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Marianne Castano@EES
	05/16/2001 02:05 PM

		 To: Ceryl Lipshutz/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Sean A Holmes/HOU/EES@EES, Connie
Estrems/HOU/EES@EES, Jason Woodward/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Denise Furey/Enron@EnronXGate,
jmaas@llgm.com, Michelle Maynard/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Freed/HOU/EES@EES,
Edwin Essandoh/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Please see attached memo...


In order for me to effectively represent you at the ETS PRC  and for some of
you at the Accounting and Finance PRC's I will need some information from
each of you.      Please send the following to Kathy Campos who will put it
together for me in a book.

1. Copy of your goals for 2000 and the latest status.
2. A list of accomplishments/things you are proud of this year, specifically
indicate any involvement in the    Associates/Analysts Program or the
Recruiting Program.
3. Copy of a Self Evaluation you completed in the PEP System.
4. Your Supervisor will provide me with a Copy of a Preliminary Evaluation.

I will need these by the 29th of November for those in the accounting and
finance ranks.   For all others I will need the input for the 13th of
December.


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                     Thursday, October 12, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152395
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: CompuBank
 Open an account with CompuBank and get $20 deposited into
 your account AND a FREE 6-month subscription to the Motley
 Fool Internet Report ($60 value). Apply NOW!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=152396

"The best audience is intelligent, well-educated, and a little
drunk." -- Alben W. Barkley

REDBACK RAMPS UP
The network equipment maker quadruples revenues and reports its
first pro forma profit.

By Chris Rugaber

Network equipment maker Redback Networks (Nasdaq: RBAK) reported
third-quarter results after yesterday's market close, almost
quadrupling revenues to $80.6 million from last year's $20.6
million. On a pro forma basis, Redback eked out $3.2 million in
profit, or $0.02 per share, ahead of analysts' consensus
estimates of a $0.02 per share loss.

Including costs related to its acquisitions of Siara Systems and
Abatis Systems, as well as stock compensation expenses, the
company reported a loss of $308.1 million, or $2.50 per share.

Redback makes subscriber management systems that enable telecom
service providers to handle heavy traffic on high-speed
networks, including cable, DSL, and wireless connections. The
company also recently began ramping up sales of its optical
networking products, which are being used in regional fiber
optic networks.

The company, which was a Daily Double this spring, added 70 new
customers during the quarter, bringing its total to more than
300. This is particularly important for a company like Redback,
since many small networking equipment companies rely
inordinately on only a few customers, and can get slammed if
just one or two buyers delay or cancel a purchase. This may
still be an issue for Redback, however. While the company added
Qwest Communications' (NYSE: Q) U S West unit as a new customer,
the former Baby Bell accounted for 24% of the company's revenues
in the quarter.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152397

Redback's CFO Craig Genter told analysts in a conference call
that revenues should hit $100 million next quarter, and continue
to grow 20% each quarter next year. As a result, the company
expects sales to hit $645 million in 2001. While such growth is
impressive, at a market cap of $19 billion, the market clearly
expects great things from the company.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Among the many companies reporting earnings last night was
Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD), which beat analysts'
consensus estimates by two pennies. The microprocessor and flash
memory maker reported net income (excluding onetime charges) of
$219 million, or $0.64 per share, and sales of $1.2 billion. For
more info, check out yesterday's news report.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152398

Motorcycle maker Harley Davidson (NYSE: HDI) reported a solid
third quarter yesterday. Net income reached $83 million, or
$0.27 per share, a 27% increase over last year's $65.4 million,
or $0.21 per share. Sales were up 15% to $714.1 million. The
company, which makes over 25% of the heavyweight bikes sold
worldwide, shipped 48,077 motorcycles in the quarter, 13% more
than the year-earlier period, and expects to ship 203,000 this
year. However, sales did fall 38% in the company's Buell
division, which makes a lightweight bike called the Blast, and
which just maybe doesn't appeal to Harley's regular customers.
For more information on Harley Davidson, check out the Drip
Portfolio's recent analysis of the company.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152399

Fiber optic cable and components maker Corning (NYSE: GLW)
announced yesterday that third-quarter earnings would beat
analysts' estimates, thanks to strong demand. The company
expects to report earnings per share (EPS) of $0.34-$0.35 for
the quarter, 75% above last year's figure and ahead of consensus
estimates of $0.30 per share. For more information on fiber
optics components, be sure to check out our new Internet Report
on the subject.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=152400

Warehouse club operator Costco Wholesale (Nasdaq: COST) reported
a 9% increase in fourth-quarter profit yesterday. Earnings
reached $200.2 million, or $0.43 per share, 10% higher than the
$0.39 per share reached a year ago. Sales rose 20% to $10.6
billion for the quarter. Same-store sales -- sales at warehouses
open at least a year -- were up 9%.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152401

Fast food company Tricon Global Restaurants (NYSE: YUM)
announced mixed third-quarter results last night, with net
income up 2.7% to $115 million, or $0.77 per share, ahead of
analysts' consensus estimates of $0.70. However, revenues
declined 8.5% to $1.66 billion from $1.81 billion in the
year-earlier period. The operator of Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and
KFC restaurants also reported that same-store sales rose 1% at
Pizza Hut, fell 2% at Taco Bell (probably thanks to all that
great publicity over recalled shells), and were "little changed"
at KFC.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152402

Finally, home improvement chain Home Depot (NYSE: HD) warned
today that third-quarter earnings will be below expectations,
thanks to lower prices for lumber and other building materials.
Profits should reach $0.28 per share, less than the $0.31 per
share expected by analysts. Same-store sales should increase 4%,
below the 5% to 7% the company previously forecasted.

Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up with just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152403
_________________________________________________________________

EDITOR'S PICK

Two Fools debate whether Siebel Systems will continue to
dominate the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software
industry.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152404
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152405

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152406

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152407

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152408

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152409
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152410
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152411
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152412
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152413
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152414

 Sponsored By: CompuBank
 Open an account with CompuBank and get $20 deposited into
 your account AND a FREE 6-month subscription to the Motley
 Fool Internet Report ($60 value). Apply NOW!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=152415

WIRELESS 201: FREE PREVIEW
 Get a sneak peek at this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=152416

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152417

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=152418
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId: msg-10249-B10123358Address.msg-09:24:43(10-12-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


pls print all this stuff.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/18/2000
09:20 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Donna Martens                           12/15/2000 05:23 PM

To: Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Earl
Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, JERRY
MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate, Patrick Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Johnny McGee/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rich
Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup Mods

Attached is a draft application, including exhibits, requesting FERC approval
to replace the existing 10,000 HP driver at the Gallup Compressor Station
with a 15,000 HP (Service factor 1.1).  Please review, provide coments, and
sign and fax the FERC authorization form (7592 in Omaha) to me no later than
3 P.M. on Tuesday, 12/19.  Any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.  Donna


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 03:51 PM -----

	ARSystem <ARSystem@mailman.enron.com>
	05/16/2001 03:44 PM

		 To: "tana.jones@enron.com" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request for lindsay.f.edmonds@enron.com

The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034938&Page=
MyReq.


A couple questions --

1.	Could the company include distribution wires as well, instead of being just a transmission only wires?
2.	How many shares would a divesting company get?  Could this be more that 5%?  If so, wouldn't this be over the "control" threshold?

In general, I fully support this type of action.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Perrino, Dave
Subject:	Transmission Divesture and Tax Policy

Jim, Sarah and Rick,

	The following describes the suggestion that I made in our meeting this morning.  This is a strategy which could only be executed in legislation.

The Problem:

One of the chief difficulties of forming a Transco are the tax consequences of divestiture of assets. The problem was identified in 1995 when we first started talking about a Transco in the West.   If the parties agree in advance of divesture to combine their assets with others into a new company, the divestiture creates a tax event.  As a result, the Transco's like Alliance or TransConnect have adopted an LLC structure to avoid the tax consequences of formation.  The problem with the LLC form is the reluctance of the owners to surrender all control of their assets to the Managing Member who has "little skin in the game."  Questions have also been raised by opponents about the fiduciary responsibilities of Managing Member.  Are they to look out of the financial interests of the owners (passive and active)?  All these issues came up when we were working with various companies in 1999-2000 on possible pipe/wire companies.

The Suggestion:

Create a short window during which utilities could divest their assets into a Transco without facing a tax penalty.  Under such a provision, current owners would be allowed to agree in advance to combine their assets to form a new company without taxes being levied on the spin off, as long as the new company was a transmission only company.  The shareholders of the contributing companies would received publicly traded shares in the new company, so there is no issue of the original company controlling the Transco.  The Federal Treasury is tax neutral, since without the provision the Transco doesn't form.  When the shareholders of Transco sell their shares, the are taxable, if the Transco becomes more valuable, then the benefit accrues to Treasury in taxes on the sale of the stock.  With a two year window, the companies would be faced with a one time opportunity to make the shift and avoid taxes.  This become a trigger for breaking up the vertical integration for which a business case can be made the shareholders of today's owners are better off.

	Thanks for listening (reading).

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Richoux, Fred
Sent:  Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Beane, Jan; Gardner, Tom; Heard,  Anne; Ramirez, Guale; Rochelle, Betty; Wagner, Bob
Subject: FW:  President Bush and Prayer

-----Original Message-----
From: Ridley, Joe  [mailto:JRidley@carterbloodcare.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001  7:29 AM
To: Newlin, Lauri; Parsley, Amy; Grivich, Terrie; 'Fred  Richoux'; 'Garrett Whitney'; 'I.E.'; 'Robert Whitfield --  home'
Subject: FW: President Bush and Prayer
> > "First of all, then, I urge that supplications,
> >  prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for
> > all men, for  kings and all who are in high
> > positions..." 1 Tim. 2:1
>  >
> >
> >
> > President Bush our leader
>  >
> > This was the same man who came within a hair's breadth of  losing an
> > election in November, who withstood the political  chicanery of the
> > Florida Democratic machine to fix the vote  count.
> >
> > This was the same man who admitted to having a  drinking problem in
> > younger years, and whose happy-go-lucky  lifestyle led him to
mediocre
> > grades in college and an ill-fated  oil venture.
> >
> > This was the same man who mangled syntax  even more than his father,
> > and whose speaking missteps became known  as "Bushisms."
> >
> > And on Friday, this was the man who  bore the weight of the world and
> > the responsibilities of a  generation with dignity, class,
confidence,
> > appropriate  solemnity, and even much-needed wit.
> >
> > One thing struck  me during the campaign, that difficult,
> > roller-coaster campaign  that now seems years ago. It was that George
> > W. Bush never seemed  to get ruffled. Whether the theft of a campaign
> > debate video or the  sudden (some would say, vicious) release of a
DUI
> > arrest two  decades ago at a key moment, "W" did not lose his cool.
At
> >  times, his staff seemed overconfident, as did many of us. A
> >  350-electoral-vote win, they quietly implied . . . and we
> >  optimistically believed. Then they counted the votes, miscounted
> >  others, and re-counted still others. At the end, he was still there.
>  > Whereas Al Gore almost frantically huffed and puffed, trying to gin
>  > up something out of nothing, Bush quietly but confidently waited at
>  > his ranch. He didn't do nothing: that is the mistake people have
>  > constantly made with this man, confusing lack of
> > bluster for  absence of action.
> >
> > No, his team of attorneys and the  iron-willed James Baker were
> > carrying out his orders, but W stayed  in the background, confident
> > and faithful. You see, it is this  faith business that confounded
> > everyone. We have had such actors  and liars in public office that we
> > have looked skeptically whenever  anyone used the term faith. But
this
> > was the same man who was  the first politician ever in recent memory
> > to name Jesus Christ as  the lord of his life on public TV. Not an
> > oblique reference to  being "born-again" or having a "life change."
He
> > said the  un-PC-like phrase, "Jesus Christ," to which his handlers
and
> >  advisors, no doubt, off stage, were also saying, "Jesus Christ" in a
>  > much different tone.
> >
> > God has a way of honoring  those who honor Him. David learned that
> > while he was on the run  from Saul's armies. Job learned that after
> > his time of horrible  tribulation. The Messiah said so Himself, many
> > times.
>  >
> > So this was the man who actually put faith into practice.  He
actually
> > loves those who hate him. It is a staggering  concept, so foreign in
> > daily occurrence that few thought it  anything but grandstanding.
Even
> > one of W's biggest supporters  chided the President for adhering to
> > his "new tone." Yet there he  was, again and again, thanking the
> > Democrats. Appointing his  enemies to high places in his government.
> > Inviting his former foes  and their wives to private movie
> > screenings, and (I know, this is  hard to stomach) even treating them
> > with dignity. See, this was the  man who learned early on how faith
> > worked: by praying for his  enemies, you "heap burning coals upon
their
> > heads."
>  >
> > This was the man who named the absolute top people in  national
> > security and defense, then caught barbs from the  politically
> > righteous that this one didn't have the right views on  abortion or
> > that one didn't have the right position on  guns.
> >
> > And on September 11, at mid-morning, this was  the man thrust into a
> > position only known by Roosevelt, Churchill,  Lincoln, and
Washington.
> > The weight of the world was on his  shoulders, and the responsibility
> > of a generation was on his soul.  So this same man---the one that the
> > media repeatedly attempted to  tarnish with charges of
"illegitimacy,"
> > and the one whose  political opponents desperately sought to
stonewall
> > until  mid-term elections---walked to his seat at the front of the
> >  National Cathedral just three days after the two most impressive
> >  symbols of American capitalism and prosperity virtually evaporated,
> >  along with, perhaps, thousands of Americans.
> >
> > As he sat  down next to his wife, immediately I knew that even if his
> > faith  ever faltered, hers didn't. I have never seen a more peaceful
> > face  than Laura Bush, whose eyes seemed as though they were already
> >  gazing at the final outcome . . . not just of this conflict, but of
> >  her reward in Heaven itself. In this marriage, you indeed got two
for
>  > the price of one.
> >
> > Then came the defining moment  of our generation. Some people fondly
> > recall their Woodstock days.  Others mark with grim sadness November
> > 22, 1963, as the day America  lost her innocence. But I firmly
believe
> > when the history of  this time is written, it will be acknowledged by
> > friend and foe  alike that President George W. Bush came of age in
> > that cathedral  and lifted a nation off its knees. It wasn't so much
> > his words,  though read a decade later, they will indeed be as
> > stirring as any.  This conflict would end, he noted, ". . . at a time
> > of our  choosing." It certainly wasn't his emotion. What had to have
> > been  one of the most stunning exhibitions of self-control in
> >  presidential history, W was able to deliver his remarks without
> >  losing either his resolve or his focus, or, more important, his
> >  confidence. It was as if God's hand, which had guided him through
> >  that sliver-thin election, now rested fully on him.
> >
> >  His quiet confidence let our enemies know . . . and believe me, they
>  > know. . . that they made a grave miscalculation. Now, this same man
>  > who practiced his faith through a tough election, who steeled his
>  > convictions even more in a drawn-out Florida battle, and who never
>  > once gave in to the temptation to get in the gutter with his foes
>  > (well, ok, maybe the "Clymer" comment is an exception), this  same
man
> > now lifted the weight of the world and the  responsibility of a
> > generation and put it on his modest shoulders  as though it were
> > another unpleasant duty.
> >
>  > As he walked back to his seat, the camera angle was appropriate. He
>  > was virtually alone in the scene, alone in that massive place of
>  > God, just him and the Lord. But that's the way it's always been in
>  > his life recently. In that brief time it took him to return to his
>  > seat, I believe he heard words to the effect of, "You can do this,
>  > George. I am with you always. And you can do this well, because I  am
> > going before you. And don't worry about the weight. I've got  it."
And
> > I saw in his eyes a quiet acknowledgment. "I know.  Thank you, Lord."
> >
> > Back at his seat, when W sat down,  George H. W. Bush reached over
and
> > took his son's hand. The  elder Bush always struck me as a religious
> > man, but not someone who  shared his life on a daily basis with the
> > Lord. George H. W. treats  the Father like a respected uncle,
visiting
> > Him on appropriate  holidays and knowing the relationship is real,
but
> > not  constant.
> >
> > Anyway, I believe that in that fatherly  squeeze George H. W. said,
"I
> > wish I could do this for you, son,  but I can't. You have to do this
on
> > your own."
>  >
> > W squeezed back and gave him that look of peace that Laura had  kept
> > throughout. It said, "I don't have to do it alone, dad. I've  got
help."
> >
> > What a blessing to have a professing  Christian as President - one
who
> > is not ashamed to admit it!  Please take a moment after you read this
> > to pray for him - he truly  does have the weight of the world on his
> > shoulders. Pray that God  will sustain him and give him wisdom and
> > discernment in his  decisions. Make no mistake about it - the
> > decisions he makes in the  coming days, weeks and months will
> > literally define the future of  our country and the free world. Pray
> > for his protection and that of  his family.
> >
> > After you have prayed, send this to  everyone on your E-mail list.
Our
> > President needs Christians  around the world to be praying for him.
As
> > this makes the E-mail  rounds, eventually there could literally be
> > people praying for him  24/7!! He needs it.
> >
> ----------
>
>