----- Forwarded by Mary Cilia/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 08:38 AM -----

	"David Gohlke" <DGOHLKE@skadden.com>
	10/03/2000 08:12 PM

		 To: Mary.Cilia@enron.com
		 cc: glauco.palhoto@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Preliminary Engineering Release Agmt. - final issue

Mary,

I've attached the latest draft, which has not yet been sent to the other
side, and which includes a provision not yet agreed by ESA or negotiated with
EECC (Clause 1(c)).  The schedule 1, which you care about, should reflect the
changes you and I discussed with Jeff last week.  SInce this draft is not an
agreed one, will you delete it after you review it, and if you are not ok
with all the changes, let me know so I can include them when we finalize this
tomorrow (Wed).  I will include you on the final negotiated draft tomorrow
when I (or Glauco) send it out for final approval.

Dave

>>> <Mary.Cilia@enron.com> 10/03/00 03:53PM >>>

Dave -

Do we have the latest draft with the changes I submitted for Appendix 1?
Can you please send it to me.  Thanks.

Mary

                    "David
                    Gohlke"              To:     john.g.rigby@enron.com,
                    <DGOHLKE@skad        john.guidry@enron.com,
                    den.com>             john.r.ayres@enron.com,
mary.cilia@enron.com
                                         cc:     john.novak@enron.com, "Brian
                    09/29/2000           Bradshaw" <BBRADSHA@skadden.com>,
"Thomas
                    05:25 PM             Weil" <TWEIL@skadden.com>
                                         Subject:     Preliminary Engineering
Release
                                         Agmt. - final issue

ESA and EECC teams,

This email is in response to John Rigby's fax of 28 Sep with comments to
the Preliminary Engineering Release Agreement.

I am OK with all of John and Scott's proposed changes except the rider to
replace paragraph 1(c), which deals with who has the risk/gatekeeper role
on deciding whether an activity is "hard cost" or not.  While I would
prefer to keep a "Contractor shall not perform any "hard cost" activity"
-type prohibition in the contract, I understand that since financing is
really an Owner issue, and Owner wants off-balance sheet financing, making
sure no "hard cost" activity is performed is really an Owner issue.  Thus,
I have taken their basic language/concept and modified it somewhat.

I have marked up EECC's proposed rider and attached the marked copy for
your review.  If acceptable to the owner team, I will forward it to EECC
for their review/approval.  Once we have agreement on this language, the
Preliminary Eng Release Agmt should be done and ready for John Novak's
review and approval and subsequent execution by ESA and EECC.

David E. Gohlke
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460
Houston, Texas 77002
direct (713) 655-5158
fax - main (713) 655-5181
dgohlke@skadden.com

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any
copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.

(See attached file: 39148_2.doc)

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.

 - 38012_9.doc


Steve and I were talking about where to go.  We don't know where yet but I bet we figure it out.  Judy may come with us.  I say goodell coming in this morning and I told him we didn't want him to go.

YOU KNOW, THE ONE THING I REALLY LOVE BESIDES MYSELF IS FOOOOOOOOD!!!!!


Doug,

See you at  9:00 on Tuesday. I have reserved EB1938
for us.

Vince

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/10/2000 08:59 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LNG Book

9 am should be fine.

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/06/2000 05:41 PM
To: Doug Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: LNG Book

Doug,

Can we meet at 9 on Tuesday instead?

Vince

Doug Arnell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/06/2000 02:36 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: LNG Book

Vince, I would like to have another update meeting to talk about our progress
on the LNG book.  Would this coming tuesday morning at 10 work for you and
your group?

Please let me know.

Thanks


The macro in this file will query all official books for given Portfolio and
Book codes.  Use it to make sure all your postid's that need to be, are
officialized each night.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
12:19 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dutch Quigley                           10/17/2000 12:05 PM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Post ID file

To run this file all that has to be done is enter the date and have the
Portfolio and Book CD entered in also.
Information should only be entered into the yellow areas.

Let me know if any one has any questions.

Dutch
3-9257


Tana Lou,

I am back to bugging you about your bicycle.  Let me know when I can
schedule a test ride.

Patti

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:10 AM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: Re: Monday

Offer still good.  How goes things with the new beau?  Also, thanks for the
cooked meats.  They were delicious!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     Monday
                    02/26/2001 12:08
                    PM

Morning, Glory,

Hope you are doing well and had a good weekend.

I am still considering the MS 150 and wanted to know if your offer is still
good for borrowing your bicycle.  If you have changed your mind, it is no
big deal.  Promise!

Patti


I will attend


I have a question about the SFTS conversions that were done a while back so that the customer could utilize our capacity release program.  I noticed that The City of Chattahoochee converted their SFTS to FTS-1 and that the temporary acquisitions on their FTS-1 have a gap.  More specifically, they have a release in place for 10/1/02 thru 4/30/03 and the next release begins 10/1/03 thru 4/30/04.  Do the releases have to be consecutive in order for them to retain their conversion to FTS-1?  Because they will not have a release in place for May thru Sept. of 2003 according to their releases.  Is this wrong?  I haven't checked to see if this occurs on any of the other coversions and will if this is an issue.  Please advise.  nb


The "Daily Update" Meeting for today, Monday, January 7 has been canceled.  Please keep this time slot (2:00pm-daily) on your calendars, unless otherwise notified.

Thank you,

Christina Valdez
Asst. to Sally Beck
Enron Net Works LLC
Phone - 713.853-9106
Fax     - 713.345.8100
christina.valdez@enron.com


Val and I have finished auto-scheduling these deals. Please let me know if
you see them coming through approval, or if there is anything else I can do
to assist.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/19/2000 05:08 PM
---------------------------

Lester Rawson
12/19/2000 04:26 PM
To: Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Joy Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Nevada Power Oct

Val,

Please approve and autoschedule the following deals I've had to change to
support the changes needed for Nevada Power transmission for October. Please
forward to Joy when done.

Les

New Deal 477935, 477995

Changed Prices
425803,427001,430148,430175,430193,430860,458520,458498,458456,435403,435508,4
58604,436523,458762,440595,458772,458783,455667,443353,444346,444369,458813,44
6512,446512.


Ted,

Please put her on the list of candidates for the next beginning rotation for
Trader Track.  Thanks,

Fletch
---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
03:56 PM ---------------------------
To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: My resume

Fletch,

As per our conversation, please find attached a copy of my resume.

Thanks,

Bani
---------------------- Forwarded by Bani Arora/HOU/EES on 02/23/2001 12:11 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Bani Arora                           02/22/2001 05:55 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-0566

To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hi Fletch,

I am interested in pursuing a trading position with your group, and I'd
appreciate an opportunity to meet with you to discuss the same.

Could you please let me know your convenience.

Thanks,
Bani


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/20/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

Fred Mitro@ECT
12/19/2000 06:34 PM
To: Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Intergen/Coral transaction

Randy:

As I indicated in my voicemail, Coral has requested that Intergen (or its
designated project affiliate - Sweetgum Energy L.P.) be the counterparty that
transacts with Enron.  Based on current information, the structure of the
transaction has not materially changed from the Coral deal structure
described in the 11/30/00 DASH.  Intergen is holding a Board meeting this
afternoon and the proposed transaction is on the agenda for approval.

With regard to the timing of the funding, it is my understanding that once
the Letter Agreement has been executed (target date: 12/21) and associated
documents accepted by Intergen, Enron will notify TurboPark of its intention
to assign the equipment to Intergen (target notice date: 12/22).  Once the
assignment documents are ready for execution, Intergen will fund the
transaction and Enron will execute the assignment documents immediately after
receiving written confirmation that Enron has received the transaction
proceeds.  There is a desire by East Origination to, if possible, book the
earnings from this transaction in fiscal year 2000.

Rebecca Walker (ENA development) is planning to run a D&B report on Sweetgum
Energy L.P.  tomorrow once she receives the State and Headquarters
information necessary.  I traded voicemails with Ben Glisan today on this
counterparty change.  He asked that I work with RAC deal personell on this
matter.

Based upon your voicemail it appears that we do not need to amend the DASH
based upon this change in counterparty.  Let me know if any of the above
information changes your opinion.

Call me if you wish to discuss this information.

Thanks,
Fred Mitro
x35406


FYI. After you review we can discuss.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/28/2000
04:46 PM ---------------------------

Julia White
11/28/2000 04:44 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cleaned up Capacity System LOI

This is the latest draft from Julie for your review. I realize we will
discuss at the staff meeting on Monday.

Thanks. Julia
---------------------- Forwarded by Julia White/ET&S/Enron on 11/28/2000
04:39 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie A Gomez @ ECT                           11/28/2000 12:04 PM

To: Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Cleaned up Capacity System LOI

Dear Julia-

Here is the cleaned up version of what I sent you the other day.

Please let me know your comments ASAP.

Thanks,

Julie  :-)


Right now is the perfect time to refinance your mortgage!

We have excellent programs for refinances, second mortgages, home equity, and home improvement loans.

Click here now!
http://www.eloangroup.com/mortgage.asp

<a href="http://www.eloangroup.com/mortgage.asp"> AOL Users Click Here </a>

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?funnymoney:10
* Enter your email address (Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "funnymoney:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:1c.w1m.803w8


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<TITLE>2 Motorola Talkabout Two-Way Radios are yours, ABSOLUTELY FREE!</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>

 You are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of this email.

 Jay,

 2 Motorola Talkabout

 Two-Way Radios

 are yours,

 ABSOLUTELY FREE!

 Keeping in touch with your family at the park, in the

 neighborhood or at the mall has never been so easy.

 Valued at $100.00, these Motorola Talkabout, Two-Way

 Radios are yours, absolutely FREE. Simply remain a

 customer for 90 days, complete the redemption certificate

 you will receive by mail, and we will send you your Deluxe

 Motorola TalkAbout, Two-Way Radios for free.

 At the same time, you can
 be saving on your long distance

 bill by signing up with Sprint 7? AnyTimeSM Online Plan.

 This plan gives your family 7?/minute state-to-state calling,

 plus the opportunity to reduce or ELIMINATE the $5.95

 monthly fee. Act now! Click here to learn how.

 But
 hurry, supplies won't last! So click the button below to get your
 Motorola Talkabout, Two-Way Radios, absolutely FREE.

 Requires change of state-to-state long distance carrier to Sprint, remaining
 a customer for 90 days and completion of redemption certificate.

 Promotion excludes current Sprint customers.

 If
 you would prefer not to receive marketing messages from us, please click
 here to UNSUBSCRIBE.


John:  I'm not sure how to read it, but it certainly doesn't seem
encouraging.  I'll try to find out more tomorrow.

Best,
Jef

The following is an outline of the basic terms of the Southern California
Edison Memorandum of Understanding:

? Commitment to Provide Power ) SCE will keep its current generation plants
and other generation assets and commit them to provide power on a regulated
cost-of-service basis for 10 years.
? Dedication of Power ) Edison International will commit the entire output of
Sunrise (one of Edison International,s non-regulated generating facilities)
to the State on a fixed price basis for 10 years. Phase I of Sunrise is to be
brought online by August 15, 2001. If not brought online by August 15, 2001,
Edison International shall be assessed a $2 million penalty.
? Transmission Sale ) SCE will sell to the State its transmission assets for
approximately $2.76 billion (2.3 times the net book value of the assets),
subject to certain adjustments. Of the $2.76 billion, the $1.5 billion gain
on sale, will be used to reduce SCE,s net undercollected amount as of January
31, 2001. In connection with the purchase, the State will also assume certain
liabilities associated with the transmission assets.
? Backup Transaction ) If the transmission sale does not occur within two
years for reasons beyond the parties, control, then if the State elects, SCE
shall sell to the State SCE,s hydro generation assets. If the hydro assets
are not worth $1.5 billion, then SCE will also sell the state after December
31, 2010 enough below-market-price-power to make up the shortfall.
? Conservation Property ) SCE shall grant perpetual conservation easements to
the State covering approximately 260,000 acres of its Big Creek hydroelectric
related lands and 825 acres of its Eastern Sierra hydroelectric related
lands.  Some of the land may be deeded in fee.
? Contribution by Edison International ) Edison International will refund to
SCE not less than $400 million.  This money will consist of a refund of
approximately $293 million in estimated 2000 quarterly tax payments plus
approximately $197 million in federal loss carryback tax savings.
? Investment ) Edison International and SCE will invest not less than $3
billion over the next 5 years in capital improvements for SCE.
? Litigation ) SCE shall dismiss certain claims, including its takings and
filed rate doctrine cases.
? CPUC Regulation ) CPUC shall continue to regulate SCE using historical
principles of ratemaking.
? Payment for Portion of QF Drop-off ) SCE shall pay an amount that
represents that portion of the net short from January 18, 2001 to April 1,
2001 that is attributable to QF,s not selling to SCE (due to SCE,s failure to
pay the QF,s).  SCE will securitize this amount.
? Securitization ) SCE shall securitize its full net undercollected amount
(approx. $3.5 billion).  The securitization shall occur in two tranches (i.e.
two different nonbypassable dedicated rate components).

? The first tranche will occur after the passage of legislation and the
signing of the definitive agreements and will cover the net undercollected
amount, less the gain on sale, plus interest on certain obligations in the
net undercollected amount.
? The second tranche would be triggered if the transmission sale does not
occur within two years.  Accordingly, the second tranche would not show up in
rates for two years, if at all.

? Buying the Net Short ) The State will be required to buy the net short
through December 31, 2002.  After 2002 SCE will be responsible for covering
the net short.
? Investment Recovery ) SCE shall have an authorized rate of return that will
not drop below its current rte (11.6%) during the 10 year cost of service
ratemaking period.
? Next Steps (Definitive Agreements and CPUC Action):

? Definitive Agreements ) Once the MOU is signed, the next stage is to
negotiate definitive agreements which contain the specific terms of the
transmission sale, as well as the specific terms of the various other related
agreements (e.g., the O&M Agreement, Transmission Services Agreement and the
Facilities Services Agreement).
? CPUC Action ) Prior to entering into the definitive agreements, the CPUC
must undertake certain actions (which include: establishing mechanisms for
preapproval of procurement costs and URG costs, deferring SCE,s general rate
case until 2003, granting SCE some relief from direct access credits and
clarifying the first priority condition in the holding company act).
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 07:14 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	04/09/2001 07:11 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Summary of the MOU

Jeff:  I could not get the full text of the MOU, but at the very end of your
e-mailed summary you indicated that part of the "deal" is that SCE gets
"relief" from a portion of the direct access credits.  Does that mean that
the CPUC must disallow all or a portion of the Negative CTCs?

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


Ken, I will drive by - I am interested in looking at a few options.

thanks
Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/02/2001 10:05 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Dave

Congratulations ( I think?) on your new assignment.

If you get a chance in the next few days, drive by this building I have.  It
is at 5205 Spruce (2 blocks north of Bellaire Blvd and 2 blocks west of Rice)
in Bellaire.  It  is a great building for what you need for your cars.  It
will lease for about $12-$15/sf annually (about 5000 sf including the garage
space) and I have about $750,000 in the building.  If you have 1/3 of the
building (+-$250,000) it will cost you about $1,600/mo in interest.  This is
about what it would cost to put your 3 cars in a climate controlled storage
space (probably less) at a USTOREIT.  Let me know if you're interested in
looking at a deal structure.

Ken


I have pushed this meeting until Feb. We need to meet w/:Mcconville(2 hours
after Barth),Barth( first meeting in the morning), and Travis.Please set up
asap.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

RTellis@milbank.com on 01/13/2000 06:42:16 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Houston Trip

Richard, Steve and I are available for a meeting in Houston on the following
dates:  2/2, 2/4, 2/7, 2/10 and 2/11.  Please let me know which date works
best for all of you.

Thanks.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - att1.htm


Marc, I have left a voice mail message for Ken regarding this and have asked him to call either me or you if he needs any additional information. I look forward to seeing you at the conference.  All the best.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Marc Manly/HOU/NewPower@NEWPOWER [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Marc+20Manly_HOU_NewPower+40NEWPOWER@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Overturf, Elaine
Subject:	NewPower Proxy disclosure

Jim:

	A heads-up.  Following up on our conversation last month about Ken Lay's untimely Form 4 filings, it is an item required to be disclosed in our annual Proxy.  As required by the rules, we have so disclosed it under "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" at page 17 of the draft Proxy distributed to the Board members earlier this week.  Presumably the notation that Ken has since filed the reports will make this a non-event and a mere technical violation, which, based on my review of other proxies, appears to be a common occurrence.    I leave it to you whether you wish to bring the required disclosure to Ken's attention.

	I trust that all is going well otherwise.  I look forward to seeing you at the upcoming Enron Law conference.  I am slotted to speak to the group on Friday.  I may have a problem with joining you for the General Counsel meeting on the 2nd in that I have "required attendance Lockhart staff meeting" starting early the next day in Purchase.

                                                                                Marc


Done, I think.

	From:  Scott Mills                           12/28/99 06:00 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Storage Deals In Need of Meters

FYI -The first four deals below are in need of meters in order to bridge to
Unify.  Ignore the bottom two deals.  Sylvia is adding the contracts now

SRM (x33548)


Hi everybody,

Attached is an amendment to Forcenergy Inc.'s existing Master Swap. If you
have any questions, please feel free to call.

Thanks,

Brad
ext. 5-7749


Sorry...........

Attached is the memo.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Luong, Anita
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Hickerson, Gary; Hodges, Georganne; Glover, Sheila; Loibl, Kori; Hall, D. Todd; Carrington, Clara; Prejean, Frank; White, Stacey W.; Swinney, John; Wood, Shelly; Hanson, Kristen J.; Kelly, William
Cc:	Abel, Chris; Wilson, Shona
Subject:	ERMS Discounting Memo

Attached is the ERMS Discounting Memo as of 9/26/01.

Please note that the 9/26/2001 balance is based on the new method of calculating the discounting amount.  The changes that were made are as followed:

			Old method	New method
Physical contract 	55 days		55 days
Financial contract	55 days		5 days
Financial calendar	55 days		38 days

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks
Anita


This memo follows up on our discussion this morning.

With respect to the 15 million of increased VAR that the Board allocated to
Rick Buy and Jeff Skilling I propose the following:

1.  5 Million be allocated to EES and therefore remove EES's positions from
the Wholesale gas and power groups (This has already been done).

2.  Move the control and decision making of 5 Million of VAR each to the
trading heads of North America (Lavorato) and Europe (Sherriff).

3.  With respect to North America I intend to create a group called the
"Cross Commodity Trading Group" which will warehouse the 5 Million of VAR and
use it as it sees fit (I will run this group and currently be the only
employee).  This will start out as an administrative structure to use if we
need to throw more VAR at certain positions (I see the individual trading
groups staying within their VAR limits).  However, I do see the need for a
true cross commodity group that would search for low risk / high probability
trades accross the commodities that we trade.  This structure may help to
start us down this path.

Please let me know what you think.

John


After my 130th message, I sent back a screaming "UNSUBSCRIBE" message (at
least I screamed as I typed) and this is what I got in return

----- Forwarded by Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 10:46 AM -----

	customerservice <customerservice@tr.com>
	01/24/2001 08:43 AM

		 To: Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

We changed our e-mail server last night and encountered a glitch with TRDaily
delivery that we had not anticipated.  We are working on the problem now, and
sincerely apologize for this inconvenience.  Thank you for your patience.

Michelle Salvetti
Assistant Manager Subscriber Services

Stephen.D.Burns@enron.com wrote:

>
>                     "Telecommunicat
>                     ions Reports           To:     Trdaily <trdaily@tr.com>
>                     International,         cc:
>                     Inc."                  Subject:     23 January, 2001
TRDaily
>                     <trnews@tr.com>
>                     Sent by:
>                     trdaily-owner@m
>                     aui.tr.com
>
>
>                     01/23/2001
>                     04:29 PM
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Telecommunications Reports presents....
>
>                                   TR DAILY
>                                   January 23, 2001
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> PLEASE NOTE:  This electronic publication is copyrighted by
> Telecommunications Reports International. Redistribution or
> retransmission of any part of this electronic publication --
> either internally or externally -- is strictly prohibited.
> Violation will be cause for immediate termination of your
> subscription and liability for damages.  You may print out one
> hard copy for your personal use. If you are interested in having
> this publication sent to colleagues at your company, additional
> authorized recipients may be added to your subscription for a
> fee. Call Subscriber Services at (800) 822-6338, or send an e-
> mail to info@tr.com for more details.  If you prefer not to
> receive TR Daily, please reply to customerservice@tr.com.
>
> Table of Contents
>
> COURT REMANDS COMMISSION's DENIAL
> OF U S WEST FORBEARANCE PETITION
>
> SENATE FINANCE MEMBERS GET BEHIND
> BROADBAND ROLLOUT TAX-CREDIT PLAN
>
> BUSH's EDUCATION PACKAGE PROPOSES `E-RATE' REFORMS
>
> FCC MOVES TO EASE 700 MHz RELOCATION
>
> WHEELER AGAIN URGES FCC TO LIFT MARKET SPECTRUM CAPS
>
> CANNON, ESHOO UNVEIL INTERNET PRIVACY BILL
>
> MOBILIX, TELIA GET 2G 900 MHZ LICENSES IN DENMARK
>
> NEWS IN BRIEF
>
> ***************************************************************
> COURT REMANDS COMMISSION's DENIAL
> OF U S WEST FORBEARANCE PETITION
>
> The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., today remanded a
> 1999 FCC order in which the agency declined a U S WEST
> Communications, Inc., (now Qwest Corp.) request to forbear from
> applying "dominant carrier" regulation to U S WEST's provision of
> high-capacity special access and dedicated transport services in
> Phoenix and Seattle.
>
> Chief Judge Harry Edwards wrote today's decision in AT&T Corp. v.
> FCC (consolidated cases 99-1535 and 00-1090), which was joined by
> Judges David Sentelle and A. Raymond Randolph.
>
> The court agreed with U S WEST's contention that the FCC failed
> to look at all the relevant data before rejecting the forbearance
> petition. The FCC had faulted market-share data submitted with
> U S WEST's petition.
>
> But the court found that the FCC had "departed from its
> traditional nondominance analysis without explanation." The FCC's
> decision to rely on market share data "may well be reasonable,
> but until the Commission has adequately explained the basis for
> this conclusion, it has not discharged its statutory obligation
> under the Administrative Procedure Act," the court said.
>
> In today's order, the court also rejected petitions for review
> filed by AT&T and WorldCom, Inc. They had challenged the
> forbearance order to the extent that it granted U S WEST pricing
> flexibility for some services. The FCC had granted U S WEST some
> of the relief it sought on the grounds that its pricing
> flexibility rules didn't require U S WEST to show a loss of
> market power.
>
> The court found that the FCC can't use its pricing flexibility
> rules as a substitute for its statutory mandate to consider
> requests for forbearance. "Congress has established section 10
> [of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended] as a viable and
> independent means of seeking forbearance," the court said. "The
> Commission has no authority to sweep it away by mere reference to
> another, very different, regulatory mechanism."
>
> ***************************************************************
> SENATE FINANCE MEMBERS GET BEHIND
> BROADBAND ROLLOUT TAX-CREDIT PLAN
>
> Former New York Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D.) may have
> retired, but his push to extend tax credits to carriers that
> deploy high-speed Internet facilities has been revived in the
> 107th Congress by key Democrats and Republicans who control the
> congressional purse strings.
>
> Yesterday, Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D., W.Va.) joined with
> more than 30 U.S. senators, including freshman Hillary Rodham
> Clinton (D., N.Y.), to introduce S 88, which is a slightly
> amended version of Sen. Moynihan's Broadband Internet Access Act
> (TR, June 12, 200).  A companion bill is expected next week from
> House Ways and Means Committee members Phillip English (R., Pa.)
> and Robert T. Matsui (D., Calif.)
>
> "This bill represents my commitment to making sure that no
> community is left behind in the technology revolution," Sen.
> Rockefeller said in a statement today.  Added Sen. John F. Kerry
> (D., Mass.), a cosponsor: "Too many business are shying away from
> areas where broadband access either too expensive or unavailable,
> and underserved areas are put at a tremendous disadvantage."
>
> Like the Moynihan plan, which almost cleared the Senate last
> year, the new bill would provide a tax-credit equal to 10% of a
> carrier's investment in equipment used to provide "current-
> generation broadband" services to business or residents in rural
> and low-income areas.  The bill defines those services as the
> transmission of data at a rate of at least 1.5 megabits per
> second downstream (to the subscriber), and at least 200 kilobits
> per second upstream (from the subscriber).
>
> A 20% tax-credit would be offered to carriers that deploy "next-
> generation" broadband services to "all residential customers,"
> according to Sen. Rockefeller.  His bill defines "next-
> generation" service as the transmission of data at a rate of at
> least 22 Mbps downstream and at least 5 Mbps upstream.
>
> A Rockefeller aide said the upstream transmission requirements
> were lower than last year's bill because lawmakers "didn't want
> to cut out any potentially good broadband suppliers, like
> wireless and satellite providers."
>
> Because the measure would amend the Internal Revenue Code of
> 1986, it has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee, where
> several members already have signed on as cosponsors.  They
> include Sens. Rockefeller and Kerry, Minority Leader Thomas A.
> Daschle (D., S.D.), Finance Committee ranking Democrat Max Baucus
> (Mont.), Orrin G. Hatch (R., Utah), Olympia J. Snowe (R., Maine),
> Blanche L. Lincoln (D., Ark.), and Kent Conrad (D., N.D.).
>
> ***************************************************************
> BUSH's EDUCATION PACKAGE PROPOSES `E-RATE' REFORMS
>
> As part of his education reform package that was sent to Congress
> today, President Bush is proposing some mild changes to the "E-
> rate" telecom discount program for schools and libraries.  They
> include making the program more flexible, changing the
> application process, and reducing some of its "burdensome
> paperwork requirements."
>
> Those proposals also are likely to be the subject of "several"
> hearings slated for "early this year" in the House
> telecommunication subcommittee, says its Chairman Fred Upton (R.,
> Mich.).
>
> Under a section of the president's education plan entitled
> "Enhancing Education Through Technology," the E-rate program
> would be combined with other federal technology grant programs to
> form a single performance-based grant program.
>
> "Burdensome paperwork requirements will be eliminated by sending
> E-rate funds to schools by a formula instead of the current
> application process," it says.  "Flexibility will be increased by
> allowing funds to be used for purposes that include software
> purchases and development, wiring and technology infrastructure,
> and teacher training in the use of technology," the plan states.
>
> In a letter today to President Bush,  Rep. Upton, who also is a
> member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, says he
> plans to hold a series of hearings to review those proposals.  He
> also said Congress and the administration "should focus on the
> issue of broadband deployment, particularly as it relates to how
> increased access to high-speed data services in our homes and
> schools could vastly improve education opportunities."
>
> ***************************************************************
> FCC MOVES TO EASE 700 MHz RELOCATION
>
> The FCC is taking additional steps to try to facilitate the
> voluntary relocation of TV broadcasters from the 700 megahertz
> band to make way for wireless carriers.
>
> As part of their transition to digital TV (DTV), the broadcasters
> don't have to leave the band (channels 60-69) until 2006 at the
> earliest, throwing a cloud over the value of the frequencies.
> The spectrum is scheduled to be sold at an auction beginning
> March 6, but Verizon Wireless has asked for it to be postponed
> until September.
>
> In a third report and order, the Commission said it will allow
> the private sector to determine the band-clearing mechanisms that
> best suit the needs of broadcasters and wireless carriers.  As a
> result, it has decided not to impose cost-sharing rules, cost
> caps, or cost-recovery guidelines at this time, it said.  Last
> year, the agency had asked whether it should impose such rules
> (TR, June 26 and July 10, 2000).
>
> The FCC also has decided to leave to private, voluntary efforts
> the implementation of any "secondary auction" process rather than
> running one itself.  The Commission had asked whether it had the
> authority to conduct such an auction.
>
> The latest action builds upon the policies it adopted last year
> to provide guidance to broadcasters and carriers regarding the
> regulatory treatment of private band-clearing agreements.
>
> The agency extended to three-way agreements a general rebuttable
> presumption adopted last year for bilateral pacts.  The
> Commission also provides guidance on interference issues arising
> from relocation agreements.  And it has changed its procedures to
> streamline the review of band-clearing agreements and affirmed it
> would expeditiously process band-clearing agreements.
>
> The Commission's action was adopted last week in Wireless
> Telecommunications docket 99-168, Cable Services docket 98-120,
> and Mass Media docket 00-39, but a news release on the action
> wasn't released until last week.
>
> Commissioner Gloria Tristani dissented in part from the action.
> In a statement, she said she opposed the decision to extend the
> rebuttable presumption to three-way agreements.
>
> She expressed concern that such agreements will result in a loss
> of TV service for viewers and said she supported considering
> band-clearing agreements on a case-by-case basis.
>
> Three-way agreements "raise a variety of loss-of-service concerns
> that involve not only voluntary parties to the agreement but
> neighboring co-channel and adjacent channel broadcasters as
> well," Commissioner Tristani said.  "As I have stated previously,
> my ultimate concern is that the presumption if favor of band
> clearing reflects a diminishing regard for the public value of
> free, over-the-air television services."
>
> She also took exception with the Commission's statement that it
> would revisit whether to impose mandatory relocation of
> broadcasters.  "I remain convinced that such action would
> contravene the statue" establishing broadcasters' DTV transition,
> she said.
>
> ***************************************************************
> WHEELER AGAIN URGES FCC TO LIFT MARKET SPECTRUM CAPS
>
> Thomas Wheeler, chairman and chief executive officer of the
> Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, again urged
> the FCC to lift the cap on how much spectrum a carrier may hold
> in any market while a high-level effort to identify and allocate
> third-generation (3G) bands winds its way through the regulatory
> process.
>
> At TRDaily's late afternoon deadline, FCC sources said the
> Commission was planning to release by the end of the day today a
> notice of proposed rulemaking exploring whether it should lift
> the spectrum cap.
>
> Mr. Wheeler told reporters in Washington this afternoon that such
> access to additional spectrum is crucial for the U.S. to maintain
> its leadership in developing the Internet as access via wireless
> devices takes off and spreads worldwide.
>
> Japan and European countries have moved more quickly to allocate
> frequencies for 3G services, setting aside twice as much as the
> U.S., he said.  "The other governments of the world have stolen a
> page from our play book," Mr. Wheeler said.
>
> Mr. Wheeler noted that newly named FCC Chairman Michael Powell
> has indicated he would favor lifting the spectrum cap.  "Clearly
> in some of the opinions that he's written in the spectrum
> proceeding, he's asked the question, `Why should this continue?'"
> Mr. Wheeler said.  "We're hopeful."
>
> Commenting on Verizon Wireless' request to postpone the scheduled
> March 6 auction of 700 megahertz band spectrum, Mr. Wheeler said
> the carrier's request was legitimate.  Still, CTIA hadn't decided
> whether it would support it in comments it files with the FCC
> this week, he said.
>
> Other issues Mr. Wheeler said CTIA hopes the FCC or Congress will
> act on this year include privacy guidelines for location-based
> services, "calling party pays," and reciprocal compensation.
>
> ***************************************************************
> CANNON, ESHOO UNVEIL INTERNET PRIVACY BILL
>
> Reps. Chris Cannon, (R., Utah) and Anna Eshoo, (D., Calif.),
> today unveiled the Consumer Internet Privacy Act, which would
> require operators of commercial Web sites that collect personally
> identifiable information to define what type of information is
> collected, and to state how it will be used and who is collecting
> it. The bipartisan bill would allow the Federal Trade Commission
> to issue civil penalties of up to $22,000 per violation, or a
> total of $500,000.
>
> Cannon said the bill is a good starting point for addressing the
> issue of Internet privacy. "We are going to rely heavily on the
> marketplace to help define how to implement the guidelines
> established in this bill's language, just as the market has
> commendably worked with government officials to develop other
> standards and seals for privacy," he said.
>
> Eshoo, who said consumers shouldn't have to "reveal their life
> story every time they surf the Web," added that privacy must be
> protected without impeding the free flow of information on the
> Internet. "This legislation achieves that goal--the bill doesn't
> regulate the Internet; it empowers the consumer," Eshoo said.
>
> HR 237 also would require Web site operators to give users an
> opportunity to limit the use and disclosure of their personal
> information for marketing purposes in a "clear, conspicuous, and
> easy manner to execute."
>
> ***************************************************************
> MOBILIX, TELIA GET 2G 900 MHZ LICENSES IN DENMARK
>
> Denmark today announced the award of second-generation wireless
> licenses to Mobilix A/S and Telia A/S.  The National Telecom
> Agency had received applications from four bidders for the 900
> megahertz band licenses, which were issued in a comparative
> process known as a "beauty contest."
>
> Included in the binding terms of the licenses are the prices and
> products to be offered, in addition to the terms for
> interconnection with other carriers.
>
> Meanwhile, Dutch regulators have decided to allocate additional
> third-generation licenses by auction, with the aim of awarding
> the licenses by October.  The licenses will cover 3G services in
> the 1900-1980 MHz, 2010-2025 MHz, and 2110-2170 MHz bands.  Last
> year, the Dutch government raised 5.9 million Dutch guilders
> ($2.5 billion) when it auctioned five 3G licenses (TR, July 31,
> 2000).
>
> ***************************************************************
> NEWS IN BRIEF
>
> The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers said its
> board elected M. Stuart Lynn to succeed Michael Roberts as
> president and chief executive officer of ICANN.  Mr. Roberts has
> held the position since October 1998, overseeing ICANN's start-up
> as an organization and commercial entity.  Mr. Lynn is a former
> chief information officer for the University of California
> system.  He'll take over the CEO post at the conclusion of
> ICANN's board meeting in Melbourne, Australia, March 10-13....
>
> Alamosa PCS Holdings, Inc., said President and Chief Operating
> Officer Jerry Brantley has left the company.  In addition, Chief
> Technology Officer Tony Sabatino and regional vice presidents now
> report to David Sharbutt, the company's chairman and chief
> executive officer....
>
> Dale Hatfield, former chief of the FCC's Office of Engineering
> and Technology, has joined Fantasma Networks, Inc., as a
> technical adviser.  Mr. Hatfield will advise the Mountain View,
> Calif.-based wireless video networking technology provider on
> ultrawideband technology.  He also is director of the
> Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program at the University of
> Colorado at Boulder....
>
> European competitive local telecom and Internet services provider
> CompleTel Europe N.V. said today that it named Jerome de Vitry
> chief operating officer, effective Jan. 1.  Mr. de Vitry also is
> president of CompleTel France....
>
> Ronald E. Frieson, vice president-general manager of new product
> implementation for BellSouth Corp.'s Consumer Services division,
> today was named to help BellSouth Chairman and Chief Executive
> Officer Duane Ackerman lead the company's diversity strategies
> and initiatives, throughout the corporation.  Mr. Frieson will be
> responsible for ensuring that diversity is reflected in all
> BellSouth's business activities, including advertising and
> marketing, purchasing, deploying services, and philanthropic
> activities....
>
> Anthony J. Cassara, a former president of Global Crossing Ltd.'s
> Carrier Services division, has been named vice chairman and a
> director of submarine cable operator and carrier network services
> provider Pangea Ltd....
>
> Nextel Communications, Inc., has promoted Scott E. Hoganson to
> senior vice president-sales operations.  He previously was
> president of the carrier's MidSouth area.  Nextel also promoted
> Linda Marshall to vice president-Midwest region.  Ms. Marshall
> previously was president of the company's Great Lakes area....
>
> San Diego, Calif.-based ideaEDGE Ventures has hired Hans
> Davidsson as a managing partner.  Mr. Davidsson was vice
> president-Internet applications and solutions at Telefon AB L.M.
> Ericsson....
>
> Research in Motion Ltd. has appointed Larry Conlee chief
> operating officer-engineering and manufacturing.  Mr. Conlee
> previously was at Motorola, Inc., where he was a corporate vice
> president for various groups and divisions....
>
> Frank D. Brilliant has joined Arch Wireless, Inc., as vice
> president of the paging carrier's newly created Business
> Solutions Group.  He previously was vice president-sales at
> BizRate.com....
>
> Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson is forming a separate company to focus
> on mobile Internet networks and applications.  The company will
> be called Ericsson Internet Applications and Solutions AB....
>
> Net bids in the FCC's ongoing reauction of 422 "C" and "F" block
> PCS (personal communications service) licenses remained at $16.8
> billion by the end of bidding today.  The auction appears to be
> nearing an end, with only 12 new bids being offered in today's
> 85th, and last, round.  Verizon Wireless was still ahead with
> $8.7 billion in bids.  It was followed by Alaska Native Wireless
> LLC, which is partly owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., which
> remained steady at $2.8 billion.  Salmon PCS LLC--partly owned by
> Cingular Wireless LLC--was still at $2.3 billion.  Thirty-five
> bidders remained eligible after bidding was completed today....
>
> New Skies Satellites N.V. has asked the FCC's International
> Bureau to clarify or reconsider an order last month that granted
> Telesat Canada's petition to add the Anik F-1 satellite to the
> Permitted Space Station List.  New Skies said clarification is
> needed so all parties understand (1) "that additional
> authorization would be necessary before Anik F-1 would be allowed
> to provide narrowband services to any C-band earth stations
> operating in the U.S. that are smaller than 4.5 meters in
> diameter," and (2) "the Commission's rationale for concluding
> that operations from adjacent orbital locations will be
> protected"....
>
> Pegasus Development Corp. is asking the FCC's International
> Bureau to reconsider its decision last month to grant Loral
> CyberStar, Inc., authority to launch and operate two satellites
> in the geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) to provide fixed-
> satellite service (FSS) in the Ka-band.  In a petition for
> reconsideration filed Jan. 19, Pegasus argued that the
> International Bureau's order "relies on a stale and inapplicable
> record. . .A refreshed record will demonstrate that there cur-
> rently exists a shortage of available Ka-band orbital locations,
> that Loral has sufficient access to other orbital resources, and
> that the public interest would be better served by making the 67-
> [degree] W.L. orbital location available for the second-round Ka-
> band applicants," Pegasus said....
>
> Advance Fibre Communications of Petaluma, Calif., said it signed
> a new multiyear agreement valued at about $200 million to provide
> remote broadband access platforms to Sprint Nroth Supply.  Sprint
> North Supply is one of two national AFC distributors....
>
> The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
> (NTIA) has scheduled a Jan. 31 public meeting to discuss the
> results of an agency study on ultrawideband (UWB) systems.  NTIA
> said the test was intended to develop practical methods for
> characterizing the very narrow pulses of UWB systems and to
> assess the compatibility between UWB devices and selected federal
> radio communications or sensing systems.  The meeting is
> scheduled for 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Department of Commerce in
> Washington. For more information, contact NTIA at
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov....
>
> QUALCOMM, Inc., said it has prevailed in three patent opposition
> proceedings in Korea and Europe that were initiated by Motorola,
> Inc.  In separate proceedings, the Korean Intellectual Property
> Office has upheld two QUALCOMM patents, and the European Patent
> Office upheld a third patent.  In another development, SnapTrack,
> Inc., a QUALCOMM subsidiary, has been awarded a patent from the
> U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for its wireless location and
> asset tracking technology.
>
> ********************************************************
> TR DAILY Copyright 2001 Telecommunications Reports International,
> Inc., (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted weekdays, except for
> holidays.  Visit us on the World Wide Web at http://www.tr.com.
> Published by the Business & Finance Group of CCH INCORPORATED.
>
> Editor: George E. Brandon
> Associate Editor: Steve Peacock
> Editor in Chief: Victoria A. Mason
> Publisher: Stephen P. Munro
> 1333 H Street, NW, 1st Floor-East Tower, Washington, DC 20005
> Editorial information: Telephone:  (202) 312-6100
>                        Fax:  (202) 842-3047
>                        Email: gbrandon@tr.com
>
> Customer Service:      Telephone:  (202) 312-6050
>                                    (877) 874-8737
>                        Fax:  (202) 842-3023
>                        Email: customerservice@tr.com
>
> Federal copyright law prohibits duplication or reproduction in
> any form, including electronic, without permission of the
> publisher.


** High Priority **

Peter: Further to voicemail and email, please send the current version of the
GE Breakout agreement for the LVCII project to Lisa.Bills@enron.com and
Roseann.Engeldorf@ENRON.com

We anticipate that it will be necessary to modify the GE Agreement per
comments that would be transmitted by Rose or Lisa and would ask that the
document be turned around as quickly as possible.

If you have any questions you can reach me at 904 630 5376.

Tom Constantine

Thomas B. Constantine
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
50 N. Laura Street, Suite 2800
Jacksonville, FL 32202
904-630-5376
tconstan@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================


ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am going home.  i have to.  if i wasn't going to dallas i would go.  sorry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

or somewhere

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no i'm going to finish this and ask fred if i can leave, walk with you, get in my car and go home.  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

come back to work?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you going to come back

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:11 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

can you wait about 20 minutes?  you are impatient.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok how about now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't go.  i'll walk out with you though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok, ready?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maybe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you almost done

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i promise she does.  she said that she had to have a report to louise by the 7th

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no she doesnt, ready?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't.  i am not finished with this and she needs it by the weekend.  i won't get home until late.  what's so urgent?  cna't it wait another week?  i am so funny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope, lets go now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't think that i can go.  maybe next week.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i know, lets go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

you lied.  fred is still here.


I have talked with them about phys rings. But the primary counterparty i was going to use was Dynegy. The trading wanted to make some money to do the deal, but i'm not sure where we stand with the other Dynegy stuff going on. So i'm on a holding pattern with Mirant unless you have any suggestions. geof


the blonde did have a hot body.  she doesn't have as pretty of a face.  tough loss last night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hull, Bryan
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i did too, i was wasted, and thought it would be a good move to drive home.  the blonde was hotter than the chick in the leather jacket.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Hull, Bryan
Subject:	RE:

no.  i got her number though.  i want to hook up with that girl paige in the brown leather jacket.  what happened to you?  i had a blast that night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hull, Bryan
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:21 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:

did you hook up with that blonde chick saturday night?


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
05:11 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
12/07/2000 05:02 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 05:01 PM
---------------------------

japearson@duke-energy.com on 12/07/2000 12:31:06 PM
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
cc: dthudson@duke-energy.com, mhhurtado@duke-energy.com, don.miller@enron.com
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

Stuart - At Dan Hudson's request, I am forwarding a redlined version of the
referenced agreement.  The attached is marked against the last version of
the PSA submitted by DENA to Enron.  Please call if any questions.  Thanks.
Jane Pearson, 713/627-5318.  Jane

(See attached file: enronpsared.doc)
 - enronpsared.doc


Christine Tindall
4132 Avery
Detroit, MI 48208
olliecat60@hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Christine Tindall


UBS will be holding benefits presentations at 2:00 pm, 3:00 pm and 4:00 pm today in ECS06980.  Please encourage your employees to attend if they did not attend on Friday.

Any questions, please let me or Jeanie know.

A


Yes, there is a provision for the creation of renewable energy credits, which can be traded.  I detailed that in the attachment.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Bolton, Stacey; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Mainzer, Elliot; Ring, Richard; Hammond, Pearce; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Keene, Patrick
Cc: Terraso, Michael; Keeler, Jeff; Schoen, Mary
Subject: RE: CA RPS proposal & potential impact

Also, unless something's changed, the obligation would be tradeable.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Stacey
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Mainzer, Elliot; Ring, Richard; Hammond, Pearce; Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Keene, Patrick
Cc: Terraso, Michael; Keeler, Jeff; Schoen, Mary
Subject: CA RPS proposal & potential impact

All -
Wanted to make you aware of a couple of bills before the CA legislature that would place a renewable purchase obligation on all retail sellers in California if enacted.  The attached document provides a comparative analysis of both bills (which are quite similar in language) and the resulting commercial implications.   One bill in particular has momentum in that is it attached to the SCE bailout.  Jeff Dasovich and Sue Mara have their finger on the "pulse" on the movement of these bills, so as far as status please contact them.

Regards,
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>


who is handling reinstatement for ENA?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McLoughlin, Hector
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 11:33 AM
To:	Barnard, Marla; Hankamer, Cecilia; Palmer, Lizzette; Sweet, Twanda; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Employee Reinstatement

Lizzette,
If we have to reinstate or hire new employees in the near future, will we have a sample re-instatement or sample offer letter available?   I don't need one now but I anticipate possibly needing one in the future.
H
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	McLoughlin, Hector
Subject:	FW: Employee Reinstatement

Hector, this may be coming - We need to get approval from Net Works OTC and then Oxley, but just fyi.  I will forward emails to you as I receive them.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Craig, Braedi
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Beck, Sally; Barnard, Marla
Subject:	Employee Reinstatement

Please see the below message from Kevin Sweeney.

Sally
Per our conversation yesterday, below is a list of EGM employees that we would like to reinstate.  Please use this for changes to the budget and I will provide a justification memo by lunch time today.
1.) Bill Kasemervisz - Manager
2.) Marilyn Schoppe - Staff
3.) Tara Bryce - Staff or Specialist
4.) Paula Lacour - Staff or Specialist
5.) Elizabeth Hernandez - Sr. Specialist
6.) Linda Ewing - Specialist

Thanks
Kevin


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042317.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   0.53 / Final:   0.32)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   6.49 / Final:   7.04)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Michelle Levinski
1015 Walnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19107
michelle.levinski@mail.tju.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Michelle Levinski


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW0238  SEP 17,2001       8:46 PACIFIC      11:46 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) ConAgra Plans New $25 Million
Distribution Center in Indiana, in an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors & Food Writers

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 17, 2001--Industrialinfo.com
(Industrial Information Resources Inc; Houston, Texas) has confirmed
that ConAgra Foods Incorporated (NYSE:CAG) (Omaha, Neb.) has started
construction on a new 500,000 square foot distribution center located
on 44 acres in Lebanon, Ind., to support distribution of raw food
products that go into ConAgra brand food products.
	   Opus North Corporation (Westerville, Ohio) has been selected as
the general contractor and site construction began back in mid-August.
Construction will be completed by April 2002 on this facility that
will mainly distribute dry goods. Of the total 500,000 square feet,
25,000 square feet of the facility will be refrigerated area. The
remaining area of 475,000 square feet will act as dry storage area and
office space. The shipping docks will consist of 100 doors for
tractor-trailer loading. A railroad spur will also be installed on the
south side of the building to tie into CSX rail lines to receive and
ship products via rail.
	   The distribution center located at Indiana State Highway 39 and
Interstate 65 will provide ConAgra with a prime location for receiving
products from America's heartland. Operations at the new facility will
run seven days a week and bring up to 150 new jobs to the area. Early
estimates on construction costs are roughly $25 million.
	   ConAgra Food Products is North America's No. 1 foodservice
supplier and No. 2 supplier to grocery stores. Last year it recorded
over $27 billion in sales with its 33 major brands and value-added
products.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities in the Food and Beverage market as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
foodandbeveragegroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--MJB/ho*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources, Houston
             Trey Hamblet, 713/783-5147
             www.industrialinfo.com

    KEYWORD: TEXAS NEBRASKA INDIANA OHIO
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FOODS/BEVERAGES SUPERMARKETS
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Greetings from the Pac Rim Club!

We?ve been able to get a discount of $100 on the tour price from Executive
Tours, lowering the price of the Pac Rim tour to $2,085 for double occupancy
and $2,455 for single occupancy.  (This discount is dependent on having a
minimum of 10 participants on the trip.)  The new lower prices apply to new
sign-ups as well as to those currently registered for the trip.  In the
event the tour does not get a minimum of ten participants, anyone who
registers may request and will receive a full refund of their deposit.
Along with these new price cuts, the deadline for registration has been
extended to Friday, November 2nd.  If you are interested in participating in
the Pac Rim trip, please contact Richard Price a.s.ap. by phone at (800)
521-0070 or (714) 897-0074,  or by email at ?exectours@earthlink.net?.
For more information about the Pac Rim trip, please visit our website:
  http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/pacrim/Pacrim.htm
Please feel free to contact me as well if you have questions.  --  Home
Home:  (510) 525-2880, Cell Phone: (510) 504-9999
~ William Ktsanes

Discover Southeast Asia!  -- Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam & Singapore

Haas Pacific Rim Trip 2002

More information about the trip on the Haas Pac Rim Club web site:

http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/pacrim/Pacrim.htm

Information about the Haas Pac Rim Club:

http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/pacrim/index.htm

This year's trip is going to be fantastic!!

Itinerary

Bangkok, Thailand offers incredible temples, outstanding cuisine, fantastic
shopping and the friendliest people youve ever met. Thailand is called the
Land of a Thousand Smiles for good reason.

Siem Reap (Angkor), Cambodia: The magnificent temples of Angkor have only
recently opened to tourism after years of civil war and unrest. Now is a
perfect time to visit these timeless wonders before they are marred by the
rapid growth in tourism.

Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon), Vietnam: This is the most vibrant and dynamic
country in Southeast Asia. Saigon is sophisticated, exciting and endlessly
fascinating, from its glorious French colonial architecture to its modern
club scene and nightlife.

Nha Trang, Vietnam: Endless white sand beaches, warm sunshine, tropical
breezes. Need we say more?

Singapore: We will only have one overnight in Singapore as a result of the
airline schedule. But what a great city to spend a night! Discover Little
India, Arab Street, pubs along Boat Quay or sample Malay cuisine at a hawker
stand.

Details

NEW Low Prices: *
$2,085 Per-Person, Double Occupancy
$2,455 Per-Person, Single Occupancy

Including round-trip airfare from San Francisco on Singapore Airlines.
* The Early-Registration Discount applies to participants who register for
the tour and submit their deposit on or before November 2, 2001.  After
October 19, 2001, the tour prices increase by $50 per-person.

More Information
Registration has begun!
 If you'd like to join us or for more information, call 1-800-521-0070 or
(714) 897-0074.
Presented by the Pacific Rim Club and Executive Tours International.


pls circulate to the group.  Thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/31/2000
05:35 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Hyatt
10/31/2000 12:38 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Electric Developments

please distribute for your staff meeting
KH
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 10/31/2000
12:37 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
10/27/2000 12:34 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: Electric Developments

I consulted with Kevin before I took the oars in trying to answer your
question, as well as the questions raised in Drew's e-mail.  Here's what we
found out...

Steve's question:

What economics would determine if a developer could site a power plant in New
Mexico (maybe 3,000MW) and build a line to the grid in California versus us
expanding to deliver the gas to a power plant in California?

What you're really asking here is "What are the comparative economics of
energy delivered by wire versus energy delivered by pipeline?"  In this
analysis, there are a few considerations -- (1) original capital cost to
construct facilities, (2) the operating cost of the facilities, including
energy loss, and (3) environmental and other permitting considerations.

 Engineers tell us that, as a rule of thumb, high voltage transmission lines
and tower facilities cost approximately $800,000 to $1MM/mile to construct
turnkey.  This figure is comparable to the $1MM/mile "rule of thumb" we use
for turnkey construction of mainline diameter (30-36") high-pressure steel
pipeline.

In terms of operating costs, for anything over 100 miles in length, there are
three (3) basic sources of energy loss in electric transmission: (1)
transformation loss, (2) radiation loss (EFM) and (3) heat loss across the
conductors.  A rule of thumb for electric transmission loss is 3%.  This
number is comparable to the actual fuel used for compression on
Transwestern's pipeline.

The most critical issue impacting construction of high voltage transmission
lines is in the area of permitting.  There just aren't many new transmission
lines being approved.  It was suggested by more than one source that an
electric transmission project on the order posited in your example, could
take anywhere from 6 to 10 years to secure authorization.  The issues of
electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation around high voltage power lines, along
with other wildlife endangerment concerns, are significant obstacles in
securing permits for right-of-way.

In short, the answer is that while the economics on face appear to be
comparable for construction and operation of both natural gas pipelines and
electric transmission lines, the protracted permitting process for electric
transmission lines tips the scale considerably towards the more immediate
returns available on investment in natural gas pipeline infrastructure.

Drew's questions:

1. What are the key factors that determine where a power plant developer puts
his plant?

For purposes of this exercise, I'm assuming we're talking gas-fired
generation.  Developers generally describe four considerations in deciding
where to site a new electric power plant:
 1. Market area demand (distributive) and/or Transmission access to market
 2. Water rights for turbine cooling
 3. Ease of permitting (environmental, encroachment, fed/state/local
regulations, affected agencies/jurisdiction)
 4. Proximity to natural gas pipeline/supply infrastructure

2. Do the transmission access and pricing rules of the various
utilities/power pools vary all that much or are Order 888 tariffs pretty much
the same all over?

FERC Order 888 and 889 require public utilities to commit to standards of
conduct and to file open access tariffs affecting transmission among and
between other utilities and/or power pools in the various operating regions.
FERC ordered public utility transmission owners to provide transmission
access and comparable service to competitors and to functionally separate
their transmission/reliability functions from their wholesale merchant
functions. The rulemaking is analogous to the open access requirements under
FERC Order 436/500/636 affecting interstate natural gas pipelines.  It's
pretty obvious from the California example this past summer, that with
respect to the overall operation of a deregulated power market in individual
states, particularly as concerns the establishment and regulation of
Independent System Operators (ISO's), there is substantial room for
improvement (and possible further FERC involvement).

"In the open access final rule (Order No. 888), the Commission issues a
single pro forma tariff describing the minimum terms and conditions of
service to bring about this nondiscriminatory open access transmission
service.  All public utilities that own, control, or operate interstate
transmission facilities are required to offer service to others under the pro
forma tariff.  They must also use the pro forma tariffs for their own
wholesale energy sales and purchases.  Order No. 888 also provides for the
full recovery of stranded costs--that is, costs that were prudently incurred
to serve power customers and that could go unrecovered if these customers use
open access to move to another supplier."

3.  How do IPP's decide what fuel supply strategy works best (i.e., buy
bundled delivered fuel from someone vs. buy gas, storage, transport, etc.
separately)?

In my experience, there is no "one size fits all" formula or strategy.  For
example, in the past we've seen Calpine take a very hands-on approach to
supplying its IPP projects.  In the mid to late '80's, during the build out
of several QF's (cogens), Calpine bought natural gas reserves in the ground
and dedicated them to the project.  In today's market, Calpine has scavenged
the gas and basis traders from Statoil and set-up a natural gas desk for the
purchase and transportation management of gas supplies needed for its western
U.S. power projects.  In other projects, developer/owners and their lenders
are satisfied with a less active role in securing gas supply/transportation
to the project.  In short, projects look at the liquidity of the gas supply/
transportation market in deciding whether they can achieve project economics
and secure reliable supply by taking bids or RFP's for gas
supply/transportation, or whether to take a more hands-on approach ala
Calpine.

4.  What is the RTO Rule and why should we care?

Last December, the FERC issued Order No. 2000, a final rule on Regional
Transmission Organizations (RTO's).  Order 2000 builds on the foundation of
Orders 888 and 889 (issued in 1996).  According to FERC Chairman Jim Hoecker,
Order 2000 makes "a persuasive case for separating control of grid operations
from the influence of electricity market participants."  Therefore, Order
2000 can be seen as a natural outgrowth of the perceived limitations on the
functional unbundling adopted in Orders 888 and 889, continuing balkanization
of the electric transmission grid based on corporate, not state or regional
boundaries, as well as pressure to provide guidance on acceptable forms of
privately-owned transmission companies.

FERC prescribes a voluntary approach to RTO participation.  The order
initiates a regional collaborative process to foster RTO formation.  The
Order also imposes filing requirements on the privately owned "public
utilities" that are subject to FERC jurisdiction, and requires these private
utilities to describe in their filings how they have attempted to accommodate
the needs of transmission owning state/municipal, cooperative and federally
owned systems.  FERC believes that, regardless of format, RTO's will offer
the following benefits: (1) alleviate stress on the bulk power system caused
by structural changes in the industry, (2) improve efficiencies in
transmission grid management through better pricing and congestion
management, (3) improve grid reliability, (4) remove remaining opportunities
for discriminatory practices, (5) improve market performance, (6) increase
coordination among state regulatory agencies, (7) cut transaction costs, (8)
facilitate the success of state retail access programs, and (9) facilitate
lighter-handed regulation.

Critics point out that with its emphasis on flexibility, voluntary RTO
formation and transmission rate reforms (i.e., incentives), Order 2000 defers
for case-specific disposition many of the tough issues that must be resolved
in order to create an operational RTO.   Moreover, Order 2000 does not compel
any transmission owner to join an RTO, but provides only regulatory guidance
and incentives for willing participants, as well as a veiled threat of
further consequences for the hold-outs.

As to the final part of the question ("why should we care?"), presumably, the
development of a fully-functioning RTO network will promote both the
efficiency and market transparency goals of the original FERC orders.  As
FERC reads it, the future of gas-fired generation for both merchant and
utility systems, depends on an efficiently operated open access transmission
system.  Therefore, the promise of the RTO is to stimulate competition and
the ongoing investment in new generation infrastructure.  Unfortunately,
sources tell me that the voluntary nature of the RTO program may ultimately
cripple its effectiveness in meeting its stated goals.

5.  Has $5/mmbtu gas killed the gas fired power market?

Natural gas prices of $5/MMBtu can only "kill" gas-fired power plants in
those instances where (1) there are more economical alternatives to natural
gas fuel, (2) demand for electric power is offset through demand side
management or (3) natural gas in an environment of short supply is expressly
prohibited from use as a power plant fuel.  In the Western U.S. marketplace,
particularly in California, I see no viable alternative to natural gas fuel
for electric power generation.  Renewable resources currently meet less than
5% of the total electric resource requirements.  $32/barrel oil prices give
fuel oil no clear economic advantage over natural gas (even at a $5/MMBtu
price).  Moreover, California environmental and permitting regulations make
the installation of new electric generation based on anything other than
natural gas fuel or renewable resources virtually impossible.   While demand
side management programs are the politically correct approach to meeting
resource needs, historically, they have served only a minor role in
offsetting the growth in electric power.  As to the final point, I'm unable
to comment on the risk of future legal/regulatory restrictions governing the
use of natural gas as a boiler or turbine fuel.

Steven Harris
10/26/2000 10:05 AM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Electric Developments

Since you are the "expert" in this area, I need to know what economics would
determine if a developer could site a power plant in New Mexico (maybe
3,000MW) and build a line to the grid in California versus us expanding to
deliver the gas to a power plant in California. If you could let me know by
next Friday I would appreciate it.

Kevin Hyatt
10/25/2000 04:32 PM
To: sharris1@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Electric Developments

Steve, see below.  Drew asked me to help him out with his meeting.
kh

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 10/25/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Drew Fossum                           10/25/2000 01:49 PM

To: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Electric Developments

When we originally decided to use my staff meetings for "graduate education"
one of the hot topics was the electric industry.  We all had a first lesson
on this topic in Shelley's electricity seminar last summer.  Now, John and
Kevin have graciously agreed to join us Tuesday at 1:30 to discuss recent
developments in electric markets and NN's and TW's efforts to attract power
generation load to the system.  Specific topics I hope to cover include the
following:
1.  What are the key factors that determine where a power plant developer
puts his plant?
2.  Do the transmission access and pricing rules of the various
utilities/power pools vary all that much or are Order 888 tariffs pretty much
the same all over?
3.  How do IPPs decide what fuel supply strategy works best (i.e., buy
bundled delivered fuel from someone vs. buy gas, storage, transport, etc.
separately)?
4.  What is the RTO Rule and why should we care?
5.  Has $5/mmbtu gas killed the gas fired power market?
 Depending on how deeply we get into these topics, we may need to schedule a
follow-up session at a later date.  I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday.
DF


<title>Need Cash Fast? Refinance Your Home Now!</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;">

 You
 are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not
 to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe
 instructions at the bottom of this email.

 <map
 name=main_map><area shape=rect alt="Women + Women" coords=5,19,135,218
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011223_3&e=7525552&r=u1498&d=11&p=1" title="Women + Women"><area
 shape=RECT alt="Men + Women" coords=175,48,306,245
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011223_3&e=7525552&r=u1498&d=11&p=2"><area
 shape=rect alt="Men + Men" coords=340,31,470,222
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011223_3&e=7525552&r=u1498&d=11&p=3" title="Men + Men"></map>

 If
 you would prefer not to receive marketing messages from us, please click
 here to UNSUBSCRIBE.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Smith, Charles" <Charles.Smith@alcoa.com>
To: "Gensler, Christina" <Christina.Gensler@alcoa.com>; "Pistorius, Courtney
C." <Courtney.Pistorius@alcoa.com>; "Doris (E-mail)"
<muleman1@earthlink.net>; "Muzny, George A." <George.Muzny@alcoa.com>;
"Schaefer, Ken" <Kenneth.Schaeffer@alcoa.com>; "Frei, Laura (ISC at Alcoa)"
<Laura.Frei@alcoa.com>; "Larry&Ann (E-mail)" <lvlindley@earthlink.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:14 AM
Subject: FW: First time

>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: Beasley, Christopher [mailto:CLB1@valmont.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:20 AM
> > To: 'clinton_easterling@tivoli.com'; 'cyle@waltman.com';
> > 'jaysonik@yahoo.com'; 'June Hodges'; 'ksells@bryanisd.org';
> > 'lance@firstbanksnook.com'; 'nolan_dupa@yahoo.com'; 'Smith, Charles';
> > 'Tammy Hodges'; 'timothybeasley@hotmail.com'; 'trextreat@hotmail.com';
> > Reichardt, Will D.; Beard, Johnny
> > Subject: First time
> >
> >  <<JPEG File Interchange>>
>

 - first_time_1.jpg


If you've already received this once, please accept my apologies.  I am informed that my email could not be delivered to some unnamed recipients so I'm trying again.   KC

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cole, Kate
Sent:	05 June, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Patrick, Annette; Butcher, Sharon; Buckley, Cindy; Adzgery, Ronald; Barrow, Cynthia; Bouillion, James L.; Callahan, Teresa; Cole, Kate; Dallman, Larry; Davis, Hardie; Derrick Jr., James; Hankins, Barbara; Harris, James; Hu, Sylvia; King Jr., Frazier; LaBaume, Wanda; Lee, Patricia; Leo, Johnson; Moore, Jerry Thomas; Patrick, Annette; Perkins, Mary; Pham, Lynda; Pinder, Lori; Priddy, Janice; Reese, Sharon; SAP Master Data; Sharp, Vicki; Whiting, Greg
Subject:	New incorporation

Enron Direkt GmbH was incorporated in Germany on October 27, 2000, and filed with the Commercial Register on February 23, 2001.  Particulars are:

	Parent Company:	Enron Energy Services Europe B.V. - 100%

	Business:	To allow for the sale of power and electricity to industrial and domestic consumers in Germany.

	Capitalization:	EUR 25,000

	Directors and officers:	Attached

	Employees:	Yes

	Company No.:	1594 EDRG

NOTE:
Sylvia Hu - evidence to follow by hand.
Sharon Butcher - this company has employees.

Kate B. Cole
Director, Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
Tel: (713) 853-1624
Fax: (713) 646-8007
Email: kate.cole@enron.com


Dick,

Humberto is handling the daily pricing for Maine now.

He is currently using $3.00/$2.50.

Could you please be sure to give him any updates if these rates change.  Otherwise we will be assuming that these costs are accurate.

Bill


We need to talk about the budget.  Also, it probably makes sense to talk in more detail about who could cover.  I'm not sure if Sarah is yet at B&P.  Also, we could retain Tom Hoatson go to this meeting.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: Single Market Design Forum

Can we enter a retainer agreement with Sarah at Bracewell and have her attend this meeting on our behalf.   Jim - What is your budget for this year on outside services?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: FW: Single Market Design Forum

fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, RJ [mailto:RJRobertson@spp.org]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:05 PM
To: SPP MEMBERS (EXPLODER); SPP TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS
Cc: spp bod (members only)
Subject: Single Market Design Forum

Announcing the new Single Market Design Forum
MISO, PJM and SPP announce the formation of a Single Market Design Forum.
The forum is designed for the purpose of identifying the needs of market
participants and promoting effectiveness and efficiency in electricity
markets. The forum hopes to meet the needs of all customers and stakeholders
using the electric power grid.
The boards of directors, officers and members of MISO, PJM and SPP have a
shared vision and are committed to the development of a single market. Many
market participants, state commissions and FERC have expressed a desire for
this type of common market structure.
The first meeting of the Single Market Design Forum is scheduled for Friday,
February 8, in Washington, D.C., at the FERC Building, 888 First Street,
N.E. A registration form and meeting details are attached to this message.
 <<meeting notice_v1.DOC>>
Please direct any questions to your Customer Services representative.

R. J. Robertson
Manager - Customer Services
501/664-0146 ext.227
rjrobertson@spp.org


I should have one at home.  When is Lavorato receiving the packet?


When you get a minute I need to discuss the last attachment for the Co Op
term sheet (the asset management one).  Here's the current state of the draft:

We do not have a current CA with PB.  I will have one in the am to send out.

Do you want Jude, et al to look at the EPC contract stuff?

Kay


Start Date: 4/6/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040617.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:  12.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred: 871.00 / Final: 850.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: APX1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:   6.61 / Final:   5.37)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I spoke to Sabrae,  we are cumulatively balanced with PGE, cumulative and
don't want to do anything volumetric at either meter.  The NNG OBA is being
reconciled, and they are really hesitant/reluctant to balance current month.
Florida can be paid back 5M or more, it is being reconciled, but, Sabrae is
okay with paying back.  This just in from Mark McCoy, the Oasis OBA is flat
as of today's gas day.  That should hit the imb. report next week.

Mary


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000
11:50 AM ---------------------------

Maria Sandoval
07/21/2000 10:18 AM
To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@halliburton.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yolanda Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber
Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, margiec@networkinterstate.com,
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com, Alisha Guerrero/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jfgarcia2000@aol.com, margiec@networkinterstate.com,
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Shades Of Grey (joke)

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000
10:17 AM ---------------------------

monica.richardson@ni.com on 07/21/2000 10:02:35 AM
To: wrivera@broadwing.com, "Maria Sandoval" <Maria.Sandoval@enron.com>,
yolanda.sandoval@enron.com, Phillips Sarah-RA8255
<Sarah.Phillips@motorola.com>, telisha.richardson@sous.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Shades Of Grey (joke)

Cute!
---------------------- Forwarded by Monica Richardson/AUS/NIC on 07/21/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

Liles Lindsay-R9127C <R9127C@phoenix.mot.com> on 07/21/2000 09:58:04 AM

To:   Windom Misty-R8834C <R8834C@phoenix.mot.com>, "'Robbie Susen'"
      <rsusen@Perficient.com>, Monica Richardson/AUS/NIC@NIC, "'Kim Crouchet'"
      <kim@homefurn.com>, "'Jamie Youens'" <jhy@airmail.net>, "'Ilka
Montross'"
      <imontross@yahoo.com>, "'Heather Carlile'"
<Heather_L_Carlile@knoll.com>,
      "'Elizabeth Moore'" <elizabethmooreiv@yahoo.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: Shades Of Grey (joke)

Lindsay Liles
College Recruiter
Motorola Global Talent Supply
1-512-996-4776 (direct)
1-800-531-5183 (toll free)
1-800-759-8352 pin #1254449 (pager)
r9127c@email.mot.com
http://www.motorola.com/ur

-----Original Message-----
From: Tara West [mailto:tarawest@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 9:41 AM
To: fwest@dwhomes.com; Jessica_Ethridge@Dell.com; Liles Lindsay-R9127C;
jhy@airmail.net
Subject: Fw: Shades Of Grey (joke)

Terry & Associates
Executive Search
(512) 327-3555 (office)
(512) 632-3110 (mobile)
tarawest@austin.rr.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim & Lisa Rogers <jljl4@swbell.net>
To: Wendy Detamore <WWDetamore@aol.com>; Bob & Leslie Mattax
<BobMattax@aol.com>; Jessica Merriam <stephen.merriam@worldnet.att.net>;
Missy Craig <NATTIEMOM@aol.com>; Tara West <tarawest@austin.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 8:57 AM
Subject: Fw: Shades Of Grey (joke)

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JCNUMONE@aol.com <JCNUMONE@aol.com>
> To: JCNUMONE@aol.com <JCNUMONE@aol.com>
> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2000 11:28 PM
> Subject: Shades Of Grey (joke)
>
>
> >One day, a little girl was sitting and watching her mother do the
> >dishes at the kitchen sink. She suddenly noticed that her mother
> >had several strands of white hair sticking out in contrast to her
> >brunette hair.
> >
> >The little girl looked at her mother and inquisitively asked,
> >"Why are some of your hairs white, Mom?"
> >
> >Her mother replied, "Well, every time you do something wrong and make me
> cry
> >or unhappy, one of my hairs turns white."
> >
> >The little girl thought about this revelation for a while and
> >then asked, "Momma, how come all of grandma's hairs are white?"
>


Paul --

Can we have a phone call with our Reg team on Friday to make sure that everything is a-ok?  I want one final run through.  If yes, please let me know by phone and I'll ask Linda Noske to set up the call.

Also, I owe you a call on Sue / Jeff.  Are you in Thurs?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Paul Kaufman" <manretz@msn.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Paul+20Kaufman+22+20+3Cmanretz+40msn+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	highly confidential

 - 081401 Granite II Memorandum.doc << File: 081401 Granite II Memorandum.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
04:56 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 09/15/2000 04:39:03 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg091800.pdf