-----Original Message-----
From: 	Adamik, Darren P.
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 2:18 PM
To:	Marshall, Lucy; Slaughter, Sally; Resendez, Rosalinda; Candella, Therese; Black, Tamara Jae; Guerra, Claudia; Chapman, Christy; Gardner, Stephanie; Harvey, Claudette; Collins, Angie; Coneway, Betty J.; Ford, Yolanda; Underwood, Jody; Darrah, Jacqui; Weatherly, Stacy; Taylor, Helen Marie; Choate, Heather; Hogan, Irena D.; Saldana, Alex; Dent, Rochelle; Montemayor, Perla; Rangel, Ina; Young, Becky; Vuittonet, Laura; Hardy, Kimberly; Presas, Jessica; Quezada, Daniel; Arteaga, Airam; Bates, Kimberly; Taylor, Liz; Burns, Jennifer; Schoppe, Tammie; Ford, Sue; Maronge, Bridget; Brown, Carol Ann; Dalton, Dorothy; Estrada, Mercedes; Adams, Tracy; Gipson, Kischa
Cc:	Knight, Robert; Cummings, David A.; Hill, Ben; Peebles, Leslie; Dornak, Tom; Alvarado, Tony; White, Steve
Subject:	Broadcast Message - Trading Floor Stentofons (Reminder with CHANGES!!!)
Importance:	High

 *  *  *  *  *    NOTE:  PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING...   *  *  *  *  *

With ECS (Enron Center South) rapidly approaching completion, Enron is forced to change the numbering scheme on the existing Stentofon system.  To increase our capacity to support this expansion, we must increase the number of valid Stentofon address numbers.  Enron currently uses 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 and 900 series numbers for the addresses.  In order to add more addresses to the system, Enron will be converting the dial plan from a three digit dialing system to a four digit dialing scheme on the Stentofon system.  This conversion is scheduled to occur on the weekend of May 18th.

In efforts to minimize the number of times each user will change their number, we will be converting all Stentofon addresses in EB1 that are scheduled to move into ESC this year to a 5000 series number.    (i.e.  If your Stento number was 364, then your new number will be 5364.)  We will also change all speed dials to reflect the new dialing scheme.  Please instruct the users within your group of this change.

All Enron Broadband Stentofons will have their numbers changed to a 4000 series number.  (i.e.  If your Stento number was 576, then your new number will be 4576.)

In summary, all Stentofon numbers will be changing this weekend.  If you are scheduled to move into ECS, then your Stento number will begin with a '5' and if you are to remain at EB1, then your Stento number will begin with a '4'.

Please inform all users of the Stentofon System of this change and pass this information to anyone that needs it.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

Regards,
Darren Adamik
Mgr.-Trading Technology
Enron Net Works, LLC
713.853.4764 Office
713-853-9828 Fax
mailto:darren.p.adamik@enron.com


any luck on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 11:18 AM
---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
08/04/2000 08:43 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: new counterparties for EOL?

Bob - please pursue, you will need to talk to Mark Taylor as there were
regulatory issues with the funds.

Thanks Mark  - we'll pursue - hope things are well with you too.  All is
going fine here.

Mark Schroeder
03/08/2000 03:49
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: new counterparties for EOL?

Louise - I think that John indicated to me that he had or would be suggesting
to you that hedge funds might be a group of counterparties to get online with
EOL.  I have also suggested to John, and pass along to you now, an
additional/different group.  Lately, I have been receiving proxies from a
number of the mutual funds (the equivalent of your unit trusts and investment
trusts in the UK) I own (some with the Fidelity funds family in Boston, some
with the AIM funds, based in Houston [but with a UK parent]), seeking (and
receiving) shareholder authorisation to trade in commodities.  Particularly
given the cost pressures on mutual funds these days, the low-cost option of
EOL would seem a good product for them.  Anyway, in the event that you had
not targetted this potentially large number of counterparties and funds, I
wanted to pass along this suggestion/idea.  Hope all is going well.  mcs


Dear All

Please click into the weekly report template and add your information using
the current format:

Text =Times New Roman
 Font size = 12
All information should be bulleted using a simple circular bullet
point.

If you are submitting information for a consolidation of two or more groups,
please indicate under "Department" which groups are represented.

 Please complete the report for 10th - 14th July 2000 and return the document
to me (Donna Titley) by 17:00 on Friday 14th July.

Regards
Donna


-----Original Message-----
From: Novosel, Sarah
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:46 PM
To: Novosel, Sarah; Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Mark Dana; May, Tom; Will, Lloyd; Lindberg, Susan; Gupta, Gautam; Misra, Narsimha; Scheuer, Janelle; Baughman, Edward D.; Herndon, Rogers
Cc: Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject: RE: RTO Week -- Summary of Congestion Management Panel

 RTO Week

Day 2 -- October 16, 2001

Congestion Management and Transmission Rights

The morning panel discussion was on congestion management.  The panelists were:  Nancy Brockway, Commissioner New Hampshire PSC; Reem Fahey, Edison Mission; Carol Guthrie, Chevron/Texaco; Shmuel Oren, University of California - Berkley and advises Texas PUC; Andy Ott, PJM; Michael Schnitzer, NorthBridge Group.

General Observations

The Commissioners were again all present (Wood left mid-morning to give testimony on Capitol Hill).  Today, however, FERC Staff was much more active in the discussion and the commissioners asked very few questions.  The topics are so interrelated that many of the same issues already discussed are being rehashed again.  This will probably continue for the rest of the week.  What I have found most encouraging so far has been the widespread support for some of the basic concepts, most notably the need for a real time energy market based using LMP.  Very few panelists have opposed this; at most, a couple of panelists have argued that the real time market should not be standardized -- basically conceding that PJM's system will be implemented in the Northeast but urging that it not be mandated everywhere else.

Locational Marginal Pricing

The panelists all agreed that LMP in the real time market is necessary (Schmuel Oren does not oppose it).  Most of the panelists think this needs to be standardized across RTOs.  Andy Ott says the seams will remain a problem and a barrier to trading if the real time market is not standardized.   Carol Guthrie does not favor standardization and urged FERC to not standardize the PJM system throughout the eastern interconnect.  She said FERC should try a couple of different systems and see what works.

FTRs versus Flowgates

The panelists agreed that transmission rights should be financial, not physical.  Schmuel conceded this point for the discussion but this may not be his preference - unclear.  Most of the panelists, including the PSC commissioner, prefer FTRs rather than flowgates.  Schmuel is a flowgate advocate.  After some discussion, the panelists agreed that FTRs and flowgates could work together, provided that the definition of flowgate is understood.  Andy Ott said flowgates could work with FTRs if the purpose of having flowgates is the same purpose of having hubs (liquidity, standard product), and if a flowgate is defined as a grouping of point-to-point rights, then FTRs and flowgates can coexist.  If a flowgate is a hub for transmission rights, it's okay.  However, if flowgate is defined as a physical boundary requiring scheduling, the two cannot coexist.  Schmuel seemed to agree with this premise, although this is not his preference.  He seems to prefer only flowgates without FTRs.   Brockway seems to prefer FTRs rather than flowgates for fear that flowgates will result in excess socialization of costs.

The panelists also agreed generally that revenues generated from FTRs or flowgates should be allocated to load, but the method of allocation was not agreed upon.

FERC staff asked the panelists to discuss commercially significant flowgates.  Many of the panelists discussed the problem with deciding what constitutes a commercially significant flowgate, and what happens when circumstances change over time, resulting in different flowgates being commercially significant.  Schmuel said you could use either a system that relies only on commercially significant flowgates or one that uses all flowgates, but if participants are willing to accept a system where they are not perfectly hedged, use of commercially significant flowgates is acceptable.

The panelists agreed that these financial rights (either FTRs or flowgates) should be tradable in the secondary market.  The panelists disagreed on which instrument -- FTRs or flowgates -- are more tradable.  Andy thinks FTRs are more tradable; Schmuel thinks flowgates are more tradable.

Options versus Obligations

The panelists discussed the benefits of having FTRs be options but also discussed the additional problems presented to the system operator if FTRs are only options and the FTR holder is not required to flow or pay if it does not flow.  Andy Ott said options will most likely result in fewer FTRs being allocated.  Schnitzer says the issue must be resolved up front.

The afternoon panel was on Transmission Planning and Expansion.  Steve Walton was a panelist and will be providing a summary of the discussion shortly.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sarah


i'm very willing, but if it has to be done this week, it ain't going to
happen----traveling, hair on fire, etc.  let me know.  hey, did you change
jobs?  if so, congratulations.  nice title.

best,
Jeff

	Joseph Tambornino <josephtambornino@yahoo.com>
	06/04/2001 06:52 PM
	Please respond to josepht

		 To: Sujan Punyamur <punyamur@haas.berkeley.edu>, Ken Bruce
<kbruce@rfspectrum.com>, Deepika <dshah@haas.berkeley.edu>, Eric
<eric.jordan@keynote.com>, Jeff <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>, "'Lesley
Keffer'" <lesley@stsupery.com>
		 cc: dimeff@haas.berkeley.edu
		 Subject: Admission Round 2

Hello Comrades:

Round two of the admission process is onto the
acceptance stage and Diane has called upon us again to
rally round the phones and corral these new admits.
We have about 85, so with 7 of us, that translates to
about 12 contacts apiece.

Please confirm your willingness and availibility so I
can send out the lists ASAP.  TJ tells me that they
want these calls made this week.

Thanks, again  (and you thought you were enjoying your
summer--except for the Enron manager, of course)  ;-]

JT

=====
Joseph Tambornino
Vice President
Hall Equities Group
(925) 933-4000

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


I have to clean up clustering and curve mappings from Estate to NETCO.  Last correlation update was Nov. 29th and I'm assuming we may have some issues.  The curves we are rolling into NETCO need to be highly accurate for the last 60 days to ensure variance covariance matrix is appropriate.  Please provide me list of curves we are using in NETCO.  Identify which curves should be primary and which curves can be secondary.  Additionally, please identify if there are any regional constraints that need to be "locked in" between primary and secondary curves.  I will then re-run correlations so we can properly understand diversification benefit across wholesale as it relates to proposed VAR limit structures.

Thanks,
Frank


This in an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM
web site.  Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit
your league's site at http://football.commissioner.com/kourn

-------------------------------------------------------------

Phillip Love requests the following transaction:.

  Drop Jake Plummer.
  Add Drew Bledsoe.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and
select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office.


For those of you who have been trying to access the PEP System, this morning
or today, stop trying.  There are still problems with the system and it is
unlikely that you will be bale to get in or submit your reviewers
successfully.

INSTEAD, please submit your list of reviewers to Brenda via e-mail.  She will
make any changes necessary and forward them on to the PEP Helpdesk.  They
will then be responsible for entering your reviewers manually.

If you have any questions, please call.

Thanx!
Yvette
x3.5953
---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
05/18/2000 02:27 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Brenda F Herod @ ECT                           05/15/2000 12:41 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Performance Review - Mid-Year

It's that time of the year again - just earlier this year than last year!!!
Please log into the PEP system, when it becomes available, and select at
least five feedback reviewers.  The feedback is intended to reflect
interraction throughout the organization.  For leads and managers and
directors, please make sure you include at least one direct report.  The
reviewers you select should be employees whom you have worked with frequently
since 1/1/00 and whom can provide constructive feedback as to your
performance.  Nothing prevents you from selecting more than 5 reviewers.  I
will review them, and if I feel there are others whom should be added, I will
do so.  ASSUMING the system becomes available soon, please complete your
selection process by COB, Tuesday, 5/16/00.  I want to approve these ASAP, so
we can get our request out early.  Turn around is critical.

The next thing I will need is a listing of your accomplishments for 2000.  I
would like these by E-Mail by Monday, June 5, 10:00am.  Once again, the
timeline is critical to the process, and is not negotiable.

Although we have reorganized the Risk group effective 5/1/00, I will still
perform the performance reviews.  Mike, Steve will be responsible for your
review.

Let me know if you hav any questions or concerns.  Thanks for supporting the
process and the timeline!


Dear Dr. Kaminski

My name is Jaesoo Lew and I am referred by Dr. Wayne Lee.

Currently I've been working at Aquila Energy in Kansas City as an pricing
analyst since July 2000.  Since then, I have developed a natural gas storage
valuation model applying the swing options (forest method) pricing approach.
The price processes would be considered critical for the storage valuation
since a trinomial forest is required to value storage. Also the c++
programming using Excel DLL has been developed, too.

I attached my resume to this message for your consideration and am looking
forward to talking about an opportunity at Enron.

My home phone number is 913-649-0578, Dr. Kaminski, I will wait your call in
this week as Dr. Lee informed me.  If possible, please let me know your
expected calling day through the mail.  I appreciate your consideration.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Jaesoo Lew
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - vitae2.doc


Unlike other transmission providers, when we buy transmission from APS, the
Start Time and End Time are both HOUR ENDING.  According to them, they are
"the leaders of the pack."  So, if we want to purchase tranny for HE 14 FC to
PV (like I did today), both the start time and end time would be 14:00.  Make
sure that you have the right time zone as well.

Cheers
Jesse


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 09/07/2000
01:00 PM ---------------------------

"Patrick P. Rubertone" <prubertone@keyspanenergy.com> on 09/07/2000 12:53:26
PM
To: bonafide-fuel-oil <bonafide-fuel-oil@worldnet.att.net>, Charles Lombardi
<clombardi@cooplink.net>, Ken Cruikshank <cruikshankk@conedsolutions.com>,
Mary Skipton <enrgn@aol.com>, Anna Kozak <akozak@mitchellsupreme.com>, Jeff
Cohn <GEEC2000@aol.com>, Phil Forma <intenergy@aol.com>, Janet Garaflow
<jgarofalow@castlepower.com>, Jessie Sanchez <jsanchez@castleoil.com>, WJK
<kinneary@bellatlantic.net>, Laurence Morris <lsmorris@metromediaenergy.com>,
Melanie Casas <mcasas@hess.com>, Martha Naeser <mnaeser@naenergy.com>,
Abraham Landau <nygas@webspan.net>, Phil Baratz <pbaratz@totalnrg.com>, Usher
Fogel <ufogel@aol.com>, Rachel Perez <rperez@allenergy.com>, Saul Horowitz
<saulh@econnergy.com>, Terry Kain <tkain@worldnet.att.net>, Susan Filgaras
<ceine@aol.com>, Roger Loughlin <info@ffcenergy.com>, sjfuel
<sjfuel@mindspring.com>, Cary Bender <cbender22@aol.com>, Charles Jacobini
<charles.jacobini@acnenergy.com>, Carol Manger <cmanger@hess.com>, Dave
Smollett <dsmollett@lynbrookvillage.com>, Steve Geiringer <NAU87@aol.com>,
Robert Topolski <rtopolski@txuenergy.com>, Victor Ferreira
<vferreira@r-techenergy.com>, Adrienne Austin <AustinA@conedsolutions.com>,
Robert Leavy <metroenergy@worldnet.att.net>, Bob Reicher
<gasinfo@stuyfuel.com>, Larry Campbell <lcampbel@enron.com>, Patricia Kelly
<pkelly@castleoil.com>, Rich Albanese <ralbanese@allenergy.com>, Naomi
Rodriguez <end.nat@prodigy.net>, Ann Abbate <aabbate@metromediaenergy.com>,
Martha Duggan <mduggan@hess.com>, Mark Marra <mmarra@keyspanenergy.com>,
Cindy Bartlett <bartlettcs@nmenergy.com>, George Rahal
<george.rahal@acnpower.com>, John Schultz <jschultz@hess.com>, Darryl Streed
<dstreed@naenergy.com>, Dick Owen <dowens@mitchellsupreme.com>, Cherie Lurie
<lurie@nmenergy.com>, Jason Thomas <jthomas@allenergy.com>, Dave Healey
<dhealey@allenergy.com>, Katy Aronne <karonne@metromediaenergy.com>, Marie
Trombetta <mtrombetta@castlepower.com>
cc: Michael A Bauer <mbauer@keyspanenergy.com>, FRANK ZYCHOWSKI
<fzychowski@keyspanenergy.com>, Gary R Smith <gsmith3@keyspanenergy.com>,
Arlene C Portalatin <aportalatin@keyspanenergy.com>, Bernice Moon Albergo
<balbergo@keyspanenergy.com>, Wayne M Guschel <wguschel@keyspanenergy.com>

Subject: Deadlines for October transactions

Please be advised that the KeySpan Energy Delivery deadline for October
enrollments is Wednesday September 20, 2000 at 2PM (NY time) and the
deadline for drops is Friday, September 15, 2000 at 2PM (NY time).

We strongly recommend that you process your transactions as well in
advance of these deadlines as possible. Key Span will not accept any
transaction beyond these dates. Transactions that are rejected and
resubmitted subsequent to the deadline dates will not be accepted.

Your cooperation in compiling with this request is greatly appreciated

Thank You,

KeySpan Energy Delivery


Wes,
As we discussed on Friday, I think that there is merit to your arguments
regarding the release in prudency in North America.  However, this may alter
the way we articulate the relative liquidity of our positions to banks and
ratings agencies.  De facto, we will be saying that our balance sheet and
income statement reflect an ability to liquidate gas and power in North
America at the mid with no adverse effects.  While this may be true,
typically these types of institutions see the result of liquidating much more
liquid portfolios, i.e., they will not believe that we have perfect
liquidity.  I believe that we can satisfy both accounting and credit
considerations if we maintain an ability to calculate an "orderly
liquidation" under a negative pricing scenario (basically, multiple horizon
VAR against a liquidating position).  This is what we showed Moody's last
month.  The main difference is that the resulting number will be a hit to p&l
as opposed to having reserves against it.  This is a long way of saying that
I think it would be a good idea to discuss prudency methodology with both RAC
and Treasury once you have finalized a course of action.
Ted


Interesting slide presentation on the state of powerplants, siting and
natural gas in CA

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001 01:44 PM -----

	"Julia Wright" <jwright@s-k-w.com>
	05/17/2001 12:51 PM

		 To: "Marilyn Hawes" <marilyn@ceert.org>, "Kelly Boyd"
<kelly.boyd@asm.ca.gov>, "Karen Edson (E-mail)" <kedson@ns.net>, "Julee
Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <jmball@ns.net>, "Joseph Alamo" <jalamo@enron.com>,
"John White (E-mail)" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, "John Rozsa (E-mail)"
<john.rozsa@sen.ca.gov>, "John Redding" <john.redding@gene.ge.com>, "John
Larrea (E-mail)" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "John Fistolera"
<johnf@ncpa.com>, "John Fielder (E-mail)" <moravekj@sce.com>, "John Fielder
(E-mail 2)" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "John Bridges (E-mail)"
<bridgesj@epenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Lyons (E-mail)"
<joseph.lyons@asm.ca.gov>, "Jim Groninger (E-mail)" <gronijn@texaco.com>,
"Jerry Jordan (E-mail)" <jordan@cmua.org>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jeannie Cain (E-mail)" <jeanne.cain@calchamber.com>,
"Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "James D. Boyd (E-mail)"
<jim@resources.ca.gov>, "Jack Stewart (E-mail)" <jstewart@cmta.net>, "Jack
Gualco" <jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>, "Jack Flanigan (E-mail)"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Greg Hardy (E-mail)" <hardygl@texaco.com>,
"Grace Davis" <grace.i.davis@intel.com>, "Gordon McDonald"
<gordon.mcdonald@pacificorp.com>, "Gary Schoonyan" <schoongl@sce.com>, "Gary
Heath (E-mail)" <gheath@eob.ca.gov>, "Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail)"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "Eloy Garcia (E-mail)" <egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "Ed Yates
(E-mail)" <ed@clfp.com>, "Doug Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "Dominic DiMare"
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>, "Derek Naten" <derek.naten@roche.com>,
"Denny Samuel (E-mail)" <dsam@chevron.com>, "Dennis Price (E-mail)"
<priced@epenergy.com>, "Denice Cazalet" <dcazalet@apx.com>, "Delbert Fore
(E-mail)" <fore.delbert@epenergy.com>, "Delaney Hunter (E-mail)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Dan Carroll (E-mail)" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>,
"Craig Brown (E-mail)" <brownc2@epenergy.com>, "Cindy Howell"
<chowell@sempra.com>, "Charles Bacchi" <charles.bacchi@asm.ca.gov>,
"Catherine Hackney (E-mail)" <hacknece@sce.com>, "Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)"
<cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "Brian Kelly (E-mail)" <brian.kelly@sen.ca.gov>, "Bob
Houston (E-mail)" <houstgrp@pacbell.net>, "Bob Foster (E-mail)"
<fosterrg@sce.com>, "Bill Keese (E-mail)" <wkeese@energy.state.ca.us>, "Bill
Dombrowski (E-mail)" <cra@calretailers.com>, "Bill Booth (E-mail)"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>, "Becky Kilbourne (E-mail)" <bakilbourne@calpx.com>,
"Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Audra Hartmann
(E-mail)" <ath@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Art Carter (E-mail)" <debinorton@aol.com>,
"Anna Ferrera (E-mail)" <anna.ferrera@sen.ca.gov>, "Ann Cohn (E-mail)"
<cohnap@sce.com>, "Allan Lippincott (E-mail)" <alippin@mail.arco.com>, "Aaron
Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>
		 cc: "Karen Jarrell (E-mail)" <kjarrell@smurfit.com>, "Karen Koyano"
<kykoyano@calpx.com>, "Karen Lindh" <karen@klindh.com>, "Karen Mills
(E-mail)" <kmills@cfbf.com>, "Kari Harteloo" <klc@aelaw.com>, "Kassandra
Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Kathy Brandenburg"
<katherinebrandenburg@flaniganlaw.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Kay Grosulak" <kgrosulak@sppc.com>, "Keith McCrea (E-mail)"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "Kent G. Smith (E-mail)" <ksmith@energy.state.ca.us>,
"Kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Kevin Lynch (E-mail 2)"
<diane.glenn@pacificorp.com>, "Kevin Lynch (E-mail)"
<kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com>, "Kevin Smith (E-mail)" <kevins@ncpa.com>, "Kip
Lipper (E-mail)" <kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail)"
<lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "Lenny Goldberg (E-mail)" <lga@mother.com>,
"Louis Szablya (E-mail)" <szablyal@epenergy.com>, "Marc Joseph (E-mail)"
<mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>, "Mark Smith" <mark_j_smith@fpl.com>, "Marwan
Masri (E-mail)" <mmasri@energy.state.ca.us>, "Michael Alcantar (E-mail)"
<mpa@aelaw.com>, "Michael Florio (E-mail)" <mflorio@turn.org>, "Mike Kahl
(E-mail)" <mikahl@ka-pow.com>, "Mona Petrochko" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "Pete
Conaty (E-mail)" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>, "Peter Bray (E-mail)"
<pbray@newpower.com>, "Phil Nails (E-mail)" <phil.nails@asm.ca.gov>, "Phil
Stohr (E-mail)" <pstohr@dbsr.com>, "Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail)"
<rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "Randy Chinn" <randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "Ray Thompson
(E-mail)" <ray.thompson@sen.ca.gov>, "Richard Costigan III ESQ. (E-mail)"
<richard.costigan@asm.ca.gov>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail)"
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Richard Mesereau (E-mail)"
<Richard.mesereau@imc.asm.ca.gov>, "Robert Berry" <berry@apx.com>, "Robin
Larson (E-mail)" <rlarson@calso.com>, "Scott Tomashefsky (E-mail)"
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>, "Sheryl Carter (E-mail)" <scarter@nrdc.org>,
"Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steven M. Pike (E-mail)"
<pikes@epenergy.com>, "Stu Wilson (E-mail)" <swilson@cmua.org>, "Sue Mara
(E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>, "Susan Reeder" <sreeder@sppc.com>, "Terry Winter
(E-mail)" <twinter@calso.com>, "Tim Schmelzer" <tschmelz@energy.state.ca.us>,
"Tommy Ross (E-mail)" <rosst@sce.com>, "Tony Braun" <braun@cmua.org>,
"Victoria Schaefer" <schaefvl@sce.com>
		 Subject: FW: Chairman Keese's presentation

The attached presentation is for today's CESG meeting.

Julia B. Wright
Executive Assistant
Smith, Kempton & Watts
980 Ninth Street, Suite 1560
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916)446-5508
(916)446-1499 Fax
jwright@s-k-w.com

 - CEC Presentation without NOTES.ppt


Vincent:

    Attached are the three documents I used in the Presentation: The Power
Point Slides, The Budget, and the Written Description.

    If you have any questions, you can e-mail me or call at 972-727-0999, or
my cell phone at 214-213-2205.

    Thanks for the support, and I look forward to working with you.

    MAK

 - THE TEXT PORTION OF THE FINAL SOLUTION PRESENTATION.ZIP


Sean,

Have you heard of this yet?  I am assuming it impacts your planned deliveries.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baughman, Edward
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:44 AM
To:	Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Rasmussen, Dale; Murphy, Harlan; Thome, Stephen; Brysch, Jim; Wax, Brandon
Cc:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Racicot, Paul
Subject:	BPA Termination Notice

This morning I received a termination notice from BPA. Effective 2/1/02 BPA is terminating contract numbers 97PB-10123 and 98PB-10227. Both have one way payment provisions. Harlan Murphy is checking the effectiveness of their
notice. We need to make adjustments to west power schedules as soon as Harlan confirms termination validity.


sorry, but some of you will get this twice.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wadle, Susan
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Shafer, John; Martin, Jerry D.; Kilmer III, Robert; Hyatt, Kevin; McGee, Johnny; Cebryk, Doug; Gadd, Eric
Cc:	Garza, Sarita; Alexander, Betty; Paschal, Zelda; Beddingfield, Liz (Mary)
Subject:	URGENT!! - Please read - New Location for Sun Devil Weekly Meeting
Importance:	High

The weekly meeting has been moved to EB1336 through the end of 2001.  The meeting is a recurring meeting each Monday from 3:00 to 4:00 p.m.

Thank you!


Larry,

Sorry I haven't contacted you in awhile with regard to the probate list of assets. We will be disclaiming various Life Insurance and JROS accounts. Harvey Cohen reffered a Trust lawyer to us by the name of Theresa Frierson (713-621-7007). We are going to have her do the legal work on the disclaiming and trust setup.

When the disclaiming process is done, she can coordinate with you the final list of probate assets so you can finish the court work.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Geof

713-853-7058w
713-412-4632-c
713-942-7972h


Paul Kaufman has asked me to set a conference call to review the FERC Meeting
that was held Thursday, Nov. 9th.

Please be advised that I have set the call as follows:

Date:  Monday, Nov. 13th
Time:  11:30am / 1:30pm Central / 2:30pm Eastern
Call In #: 888-422-7132
Pin #:  411507

Pin # for Paul Kaufman ONLY: 362416

If you have any questions, please call 503/464-7927.

Lysa Akin
Ass't. to Paul Kaufman


I don't know if you are in the loop on this one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:27
PM ---------------------------

	Don Hammond @ ECT

	10/11/2000

To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton

Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.


I like your approach.   Would the Norfolk location fill the UI short as well so we could potentially get a double benefit?

-----Original Message-----
From: Llodra, John
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Duran, W. David; Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Mark Dana
Cc: Staines, Dan
Subject: NU CT-Long-Island Transmission Opportunity

Dan Staines and I met with NU's Transmission Business Unit yesterday to discuss their proposed transmission project connecting CT and Long Island.  In a nutshell, here are the details on the project (Dan can speak to greater technical details):

Run from Norwalk Harbor (CT) to Oyster Bay area of Long Island (Shore Rd substation)
Minimum capacity of 330 MW;  are considering approximate doubling of the capacity
Will be HVDC line, thereby facilitating flows in either direction and flexible scheduling
They have started siting process (formal filing to be made this fall) and have commitments from key vendors (production slots secured, etc.)
In order for the line to be workable, one of two things needs to happen:  (1) tansmission into the Southwest CT area needs to be beefed up; or (2) new generation needs to be placed at Norwalk Harbor.  As such, NU has proposed upgrades to the transmission system into Southweast CT (they are confident these upgrades can be accomplished without too much difficulty;  Dan believes it will be difficult)

They are planning on holding an "open season" for the transmission capacity (much as gas pipelines do), and are looking to get proposals by Aug 10, 2001.   In addition to basic fixed MW block purchase bids for a term of the bidder's preference (e.g., 100 MW for 5 years), they are interested in seeing alternative creative proposals.  The main objective of the open season is to secure sufficient transmission capacity sales contracts to get this project financed and built.

My hunch is that while they may get some healthy interest in capacity purchases, the bids will likely be shorter-term plays on the current congestion differential between CT and Long Island, and that they probably will not get a whole lot of long-term purchase bids to support raising project debt.  As such, I was thinking we might offer them a proposal something like the following:

Enron injects some level of debt or mezzanine funding to enable the project to lever up
In return, Enron receives either or both of: (1) series of options to acquire firm (physical or financial) capacity rights on the line for multiple periods of, say, 5 years each; or (2) option to acquire an equity position in the line
The options on the line could be made more valuable if we locked in optionality to develop new CCGT generation at or near Norwalk Harbor, thereby having the ability to deliver CC economics into the Long Island market  (I was speaking to CMEEC, and they indicate they have a site in the Norwalk area they want to develop)

What do you all think of this concept?   Do we have a desire to enter into a long-term purchase or option position on rights to the line?

Let's chat this up so we can determine what, if anything, we would like to submit to them on the 10th of August.  Please call either me or Dan to discuss.

Thanks

John


Attached is TVA language, to which I made a few changes.  Concept is fine,
but before we start using and drop in confirm I will need to see the rest of
a draft confirm that we use with TVA.


-----Original Message-----
From: Avendano, Nel C [mailto:NCO1@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:57 PM
To: 'cjb@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'jab@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'ctd@cpuc.ca.gov';
'edf@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'rtf@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'fua@cpuc.ca.gov';
'kth@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'kok@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'gig@cpuc.ca.gov';
'dlf@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'scl@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'car@cpuc.ca.gov';
'jlo@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'kim@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'lra@cpuc.ca.gov';
'bwm@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'ang@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'awp@cpuc.ca.gov';
'mzr@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'ztc@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'raw@cpuc.ca.gov';
'jjz@cpuc.ca.gov'; Edwards, William (Law); Frazier-hampton, Janice;
Helgens, Ronald; Huffman, Mark (Law); Kjellund, Niels; Lucha, Ed;
Migocki, Joe; Peters, Roger (Law); Woo, Shirley A (Law);
'foothill@lmi.net'; 'lawcase@sce.com'; 'mpa@aelaw.com';
'cabaker@duke-energy.com'; 'brbarkovich@earthlink.net';
'jbarthrop@powersavers.com'; 'tomb@crossborderenergy.com';
'jbennett@gmssr.com'; 'dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov';
'rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com'; 'berry@apx.com'; 'blaising@braunlegal.com';
'bloomje@la.whitecase.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'wbooth@booth-law.com';
'bradylaw@pacbell.net'; 'peter_bray@newpower.com';
'randy_britt@mayco.com'; 'abb@eslawfirm.com'; 'chrisw@greenlining.org';
'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'; 'jbushee@sablaw.com';
'btenney@landuselaw.com'; 'glenn.camus@southernenergy.com';
'dcarroll@dbsr.com'; 'ed@apx.com'; 'jnnc@chevron.com';
'lchan@ladwp.com'; 'anchau@shellus.com'; 'randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov';
'hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us'; 'fchristi@arterhadden.com'; 'cohnap@sce.com';
'joe_como@ci.sf.ca.us'; 'ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net';
'costac@sce.com'; 'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com';
'ddavie@hesinet.com'; 'sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil';
'douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com';
'difellman@energy-law-group.com'; 'dpk@cipa.org';
'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; 'fosterbc@sce.com'; 'foxba@sce.com';
'peter_fox-penner@brattle.com'; 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil';
'uwua@worker.com'; 'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com'; 'mgomez1@bart.gov';
'mhg@hetrading.com'; 'dgrueneich@gralegal.com'; 'thaines@smud.org';
'phanschen@mofo.com'; 'jdh@eslawfirm.com'; 'ath@cpuc.ca.gov';
'lmh@eslawfirm.com'; 'marcel@turn.org'; 'jhay@sempra.com';
'chilen@llgm.com'; 'lwhouse@el-dorado.ca.us'; 'huse@eesconsulting.com';
'risom@ix.netcom.com'; 'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us';
'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; 'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com';
'dkk@eslawfirm.com'; 'ronknecht@aol.com'; 'kkouba@ames.arc.nasa.gov';
'LKristov@energy.state.ca.us'; 'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us';
'lehrerjm@sce.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'rliebert@cfbf.com';
'karen@klindh.com'; 'jlondon@gralegal.com'; 'dmarcus@slip.net';
'bill@jbsenergy.com'; 'chrism@mid.org'; 'rmccann@cal.net';
'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'rmccann@cal.net'; 'pmcdonne@wenet.net';
'patrickm@crossborderenergy.com'; 'kmelville@sempra.com';
'kmills@cfbf.com'; 'emitchel@angnewspapers.com'; 'imoosen@gralegal.com';
'smoss@hooked.net'; 'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us';
'pjmuller@ricochet.net'; 'ssmyers@hooked.net'; 'jeff@jbsenergy.com';
'dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov'; 'ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com';
'jogg@jhenergy.com'; 'ewo@jmbm.com'; 'aorchard@smud.org';
'oshirock@pacbell.net'; 'jmpa@dynegy.com'; 'napedersen@jonesday.com';
'georgeperrault@msn.com'; 'cpeyton@sa.com'; 'picketse@sce.com';
'derkp@newsdata.com'; 'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com';
'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'; 'cread@steptoe.com'; 'bruce.reed@sce.com';
'rrcollins@n-h-i.org'; 'rcsstl@cdmnet.com';
'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com'; 'honest@compuserve.com';
'jeff@hmhresources.com'; 'rschmidt@bartlewells.com';
'dws@keywaycorp.com'; 'mshames@ucan.org';
'jsilva@edisonenterprises.com'; 'askaff@energy-law-group.com';
'jskillman@prodigy.net'; 'ad046@detroit.freenet.org'; 'smutny@iepa.com';
'jsole@caiso.com'; 'jsqueri@gmssr.com'; 'scottst@mid.org';
'mer@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'pstohr@dbsr.com'; 'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us';
'rtavares@energy.state.ca.us'; 'athomas@newenergy.com';
'vthompson@sempra.com'; 'ktilton@gralegal.com'; 'atrowbridge@dbsr.com';
'natutt@duanemorris.com'; 'lgurick@calpx.com'; 'LVanWagenen@sempra.com';
'glwaas@calpx.com'; 'mward@sempra.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org';
'luluw@newsdata.com'; 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'pat.williams@dhcmail.com';
'chrisw@greenlining.org'; 'ed@clfp.com'; 'kfyip@seiworldwide.com';
'joeyoung@ebmud.com'
Subject: Advice Letter 2057-E

Attached for your information is a letter dated December 4,  2000,  from
Paul Clanon of Energy Division regarding the status of AL 2057-E filed by
PG&E Company on November 22,  2000.

 <<2057-E_EDletter.doc>>

Thank You,
Nel Avendano (nco1)
Rates (3-3529)

 - 2057-E_EDletter.doc


Jimmie, I assume that you and Tracey are formulating the options and populating the detailed financials on those options for the board meeting next week.  It would be great if we could see that a couple days in advance.

David, we should probably call a follow up board meeting for next Wednesday or Thursday.

Vicki, we need to speak about the board participation issues and the cash management issues discussed.

Regards
Delainey


I'm desperate.  HELP!!!!!!  We have a meeting with Duran et al today, and I
really wanted to brouse through this before then.


Chantel  --

Please call me at 713-853-7673 to assist with any questions.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Migden, Janine
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	'"Chantel R. Ornstein" <cornstein@alexander-cleaver.com>@ENRON'; steve montovano; Hoatson, Tom; Bolton, Stacey; Janine Migden
Cc:	Gary Alexander; Chantel O. Freedman; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: MD Credit review

Chantel,

I forwarded your email on.  Today is my last day so you should probably follow up with Jim Steffes.
Thanks and take care.
Janine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Chantel R. Ornstein" <cornstein@alexander-cleaver.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	steve montovano; Hoatson, Tom; Bolton, Stacey; Janine Migden
Cc:	Gary Alexander; Chantel O. Freedman
Subject:	MD Credit review

Group -

I received a call from Greg Carmean, MD PSC Exec.  Director, regarding review of Enron's credit status.  It is Greg's  understanding that the MD IOU's are planning to review Enron's creditworthiness  as an electricity and/or gas supplier.  In the event that the Commission  needs to take any expeditious action in this regard, we need to  know who to contact within your organization.  Please advise as soon  as possible how you would like us to handle this matter.
Thanks,
Chantel
 - Chantel R. Ornstein.vcf << File: Chantel R. Ornstein.vcf >>


Kerri Eckardt kerri@rentskis.com <mailto:kerri@rentskis.com>
Vail Sports
472 E. Lionshead Circle
Vail Colorado 81657
Phone(1) : 970.476.9457 x.263
Fax : 970.476.9427

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Thanks so much!
Kim

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/06/2000 10:38 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CRC Deal #474382

Yes, Mike would like special language included in this deal's confirm letter.
I spoke with him and a couple of the other traders, who said that they were
aware of the change coming in April-02, but weren't aware they needed to
enter comments in the deal. I'm sending an e-mail out to all of them to
remind everyone to enter comments in deals that go past April-02 if they want
special language.

Please let me know if there's anything else I can do.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/06/2000 07:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:

Subject: CRC Deal #474382

This deal with Colorado River Commission is for calendar 2002.  We were told
that we may need to enter special CAISO language for deals that extent past
April 2002, but that the traders should be entering comments to indicate
this.  Does Mike want us to include this language in the confirm letter for
this deal?
Thanks for your help!
Kim


Hi Dutch,

This message is to confirm our meeting with you today, Tuesday, October
23rd  from 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm, the location will be 3241 John Arnold's
office.  Attendees will be Monica Brown and Sheri Righi via phone.

Let me know if you it is okay to meet in John Arnold's office.  I can be
reached at 713-345-6687.

Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Expense Server@Enron_Development
	02/07/2001 04:47 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Miscellaneous - Jan. 01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Mark A. Palmer
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Miscellaneous - Jan. 01
Report Total: $111.65
Amount Due Employee: $111.65

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:48 PM -----

	Expense Server@Enron_Development
	02/14/2001 11:35 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - JS2/7/01

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: James Steffes
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: JS2/7/01
Report Total: $5,054.48
Amount Due Employee: $4,730.45

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


Is there an Inc. or Co. or something like that in the name?

	Nicole Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 08:22 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: cpy 90593, Hubert Roberts

Nope-  this is actually a company (better known as R-Pak).

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 5:55 PM
To: Hunter, Nicole
Subject: cpy 90593, Hubert Roberts

Is this an individual?


I think this is a good summary of where we are:

1.  QF Status:  Mirant is willing to provide a legal opinion that it meets the QF status under the PPA if it is required to close.

2.  A market report should be issued by Mirant today as to the reasons they have only been able to secure $300 million instead of $500 million in insurance.  Hopefully this will satisfy the lenders.

3.  Mirant's proposal went out today on how to protect the lenders if the SHO is extinguished.

4.  Mirant and GE have agreed to a closing checklist and fee coverage.

Things left to do:

1Finalize all documents

2.  Receive underwriter approval on the resolution of all insurance claims.

3.Agree upon mirror guarantees with Enron and Mission relating to the Union Carbide guarantees.

Jeff Donahue informs me that CFSB feels secure that this deal will close on December 15 but not before.  The reason is that there are PPA bids that need to go out by that date.

Let's keep daily status reports coming. If I have misrepresented anything in the summary, please let me know.


Hi Paula,

Thanks for the invitation. I have already accepted an invitation
from my neighbors. I shall stop by to deliver the card (or maybe I should
wait till it covers the next graduation).

Vince


Great stuff. Suspect Lavo would like a folder with colours.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oquinn, Kari
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 6:19 PM
To:	Oxley, David; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Slone, Jeanie; Davies, Neil; Curless, Amanda; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Status of Offers

Attached is a spreadsheet indicating the status of job offers.  I have left the password on your voice mail.

 << File: KO_Netco Rev Grp and Rank 1-25-02 6pm.xls >>


Dear Jane,
I received your the box of cajun spices yesterday. I will be trying them out
soon.
Hope all is well with you guys, and you made it back with a lot of fun
memories!! I really enjoyed seeing you all!!
Julie, Barb's daughter, has asked me to provide her with e-mail addresses
for the aunts and uncles. Let me know if you're comfortable with me passing
on your e-mail address to her.
Hope to see you sooner!
Frank
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


So when is this happening?

-----Original Message-----
From:	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Mon 11/19/2001 5:30 PM
To:	Jacoby, Ben
Cc:	Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject:	RE: NorthWestern

Threshold is $50mm FMV of assets being sold.  Don't think we can get to that point.

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:30 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: RE: NorthWestern

I'm out (in SF) and off Wednesday. What's the status of the deal? Were we going to require them to get DOJ approval?

I can be reached by fax today and tomorrow at 415-383-1613.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Mon 11/19/2001 5:04 PM
To:	Jacoby, Ben
Cc:	Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject:	NorthWestern

Ben,

I need to get you to resign from the Montana Megawatts BOD.  Will you be in this week?  If not, we can handle it with fax/fed ex.

Kay

Kathleen,

Please prepare a letter of resignation for Ben, leaving the date of the letter as November ___.  Thanks.


As per Lisa Bills:

& I have reviewed and am fine as drafted with Herman,s comments incorporated8

Thanks!
Megan Angelos

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Manis, Herman
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Form of Memorandum of Option

See comments therein.

 << File: FORM of Memorandum of Option (2001).doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carnahan, Kathleen
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Mann, Kay
Subject: Form of Memorandum of Option

Attached is a copy of our proposed Memorandum of Option that we would like to
use for our land options.  The Memorandum of Option will be recorded in the
real property records in the county and state where the property is situated,
and may need to be modified (as to form only) to comply with each state's
particular recording requirements.

Please let us know of your comments.

Thank you.

Kathleen

 << File: FORM of Memorandum of Option (2001).doc >>


678   579   5129


Calif Officials Examine Cal-ISO, CalPX Merger

09/21/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California officials are examining the possibility
of a merger between the state's Independent System Operator and the
California Power Exchange.
The state auditor's office met Monday with the ISO to look into the ISO's
operations and its relationship with the CalPX, according to documents
obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
The audit was requested by state senator Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, who
believes a merger between the ISO and the CalPX would make California's
electricity market more competitive, said Jan Smutny-Jones, chairman of the
ISO Board of Governors.
The ISO controls 75% of the state's electricity grid and real-time
electricity market. The CalPX is the spot market where electricity is bought
and sold in the state.
Monday's meeting, which lasted approximately 1 1/2 hours, was largely
introductory, said ISO legal counsel Charles Robinson.
"There were five or six people from the auditor's office, and they talked
briefly about the scope of the audit and the time frame. We provided
information on how the markets work and the ISO's organizational structure,"
Robinson said.
The auditor's office will meet with the ISO Monday for 4-5 hours for a
"training session on ISO 101," Robinson said. Once the office has a sense of
the ISO's activities, he said, a more intensive document and on-site review
will take place.
The audit is expected to be finished by spring, said state auditor Mary
Noble.
Senator Peace requested the audit in mid-August due to concern over high
wholesale electricity costs and the doubling of electricity rates paid by San
Diego customers.
San Diegans are the first to pay market-based electricity rates under the
state's 1998 deregulation law. A recent report by the Electricity Oversight
Board and the California Public Utilities Commission showed that wholesale
electricity prices in the state have increased 270% over the same period in
1999.
In his audit request, Peace said he also wanted to examine how effective the
ISO and CalPX were at detecting and correcting market problems.
Peace, who is running for California Secretary of State, is the architect of
the state's deregulation law and has sponsored several bills to refine that
law.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3761,
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 56

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


FLOOR MEETING!!!!
     Open floor EB3824

 Date:   Wednesday, June 6, 2001
 Time:   9:30 AM

Speaker:  Mark Haedicke
Managing Director and General Counsel
Enron North America Corp.

Re: To discuss the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department and also answer
any questions you may have.


Robert:
I am still waiting to hear back from our credit person on some of the credit
comments that you made, but here is my response to the legal and certain of
the credit comments:

1. I am okay with the first paragraph of Insert 1.  I would like to talk to
you about the second paragraph.

2. We have a strong preference and policy towards using Loss rather than
Market Quotation.

3. Inserts 2, 3, 4 and 5 are okay.  In addition. our tax people are now
advising us to require the delivery of W-9's to part 3.

4. NY is okay with governing law.

5. On arbitration, other than changing the location, I would prefer to go
with our language and really didn't see much difference in what you sent
other than the fact that it was more abbreviated. Did I miss something?

6. In Part 5, Section (e), 10 Business Days is too long.  How about 5?

7. In Part 5, Section (f), your requested change is too narrow for us.  We
can agree that any calls coming in to or going out from trading, marketing
and financial/credit personnel will be recorded.  Does that work for you?

8. Insert 7 is okay.

9. Your reduction of the rounding amount is okay.,

10. Your comments on page 4 of Annex A are okay.

11. Your comment on Annex A, page 5 is problematic for us unless we limit
posted collateral to LC's only.

12. On page 6 of Annex A, can we include both the Issuer and the pledgor?

13. Insert 8 is okay, as are the remaining comments on page 7 of Annex A
except that we need Moody's because it is used in the LC language.

14. On the LC provisions, in 1(a) can we put "either the Issuer or X" and in
1(b) include your language as an alternative?

15. I need to discuss with you your deletion of clause (ii) of 1(d).  We
would like the right to draw if an Event of Default has occurred and if no
payment is owed at such time, to hold it as cash collateral.

16. Raising the guaranty cap is okay as are the chnages that you made in
Section 2 of the Guaranty.

17. Inserts 10, 11 and 12 are okay.

18. In Section 6(c), I would like to keep that phrase as it refers to the
Payment Demand procedure.

19. Your chnages to Section 7 of the Guaranty are okay.

20. We can change governing law to NY but as a matter of enron policy, cannot
agree to Insert 13.

21. Insert 14 is okay although I may reword it slightly to make it clearer
that this applies in connection with a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar
proceeding.

 I am waiting to hear back from my credit person with respect to the Minimum
Transfer Amount comment, the LC transfer language comment and the language of
Insert 9.  I look forward to hearing from you.  I will not be in the office
monday or tuesday.  Alos, we have recently revised our ISDA Schedule to
include the following language at the end of Part 6.  Sorry for the late
notice.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Kay:  I sincerely apologize for being so out of pocket.  I have been just
buried trying to restructure a bunch of EES and ENA contracts/obligations
etc. in light of the possiblity of the CA IOUs filing for bankruptcy.  I have
been locked on day long calls for the past few days.  However, I should be
able to get in touch with you later this afternoon to map out what may be
required and I am sure we can handle what you may need.  I'll touch base
later today.  John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Welcome to Enron Center South. As you have probably already noticed, things look a little different here. We wanted to orientate you to your new environment and inform you about the future technology coming on-line in the coming weeks.

Occupancy Guidebook To Enron Center South
You will find this handy guide on your desk; it contains information concerning the enhanced printer environment, the new easy access keyboards and telephony procedures.

NEC Monitors
The NEC monitors have an internal anti-glare screen to help reduce eye strain and eliminate the need to install an additional screen cover.  Additionally, an integrated speaker has been installed on one monitor for each desk.

Turret Users
An "Alliance MX turret quick reference guide" has been placed on your desk; this includes important information about the new features such as "Caller ID" and "Voicemail Indication".

Increased Information Access
There are many NEC 50" Plasma screens installed on the 5th and 6th floors.  While many of these will be displaying information designed for the specific unit, others will be displaying various television channels.  The audio to these television channels can be accessed via any of your telephony equipment.  Here's how:

Ten audio channels have been set up for access from your either your Avaya telephone, Stentophon, or IPC Turret.  The channels have been defined on Page 15 of your Turret.  To access the audio from either your Avaya or Stentophon, simply dial the extensions shown in the table below:

Channel	Avaya	Stentophon
Weather Channel	12401	801
CNN Headlines News	12402	802
CNN Financial News	12403	803
CNBC	12404	804
MSNBC	12405	805
Bloomberg	12406	806
Financial News Network	12407	807
CNN	12408	808
Fox Sports	12409	809
ESPN1	12410	810

Wireless Telephony
You may notice the cellular phone coverage is not consistent across the floor, and some areas have virtually no coverage at all.  We are implementing a multi-network "in-building" system to provide consistent high quality service for the campus, keeping you in touch while you are on the move.

Wireless LAN
The infrastructure to support Wireless LAN technology is in place and is being tested. We will be implementing multi level encryption and security to keep our intellectual property safe from eavesdroppers or hackers.

Amtel Replacement
As a move to provide a more flexible "Plug n Play" environment and to help with the reduced desk footprint, we have replaced the Amtel message boxes with Microsoft Exchange Instant Messaging. The Global Messaging Team is testing additional software products to provide some of the features not available with Exchange Instant Messaging; these include one-touch response keys, external LED display, and printing.  Updates will be provided as they become available.

Keeping an Open forum
We will keep you informed of the changes and developments as the migration to the building continues, please feel free to respond with any comments, queries or suggestions to  mailto:Enron.Center.South.Technology@enron.com


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
07:57 AM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
01/18/2001 09:30 AM
To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Habiba
Bayi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie
Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EPRM/Risk Rankings for 20001

I was forwarded Enron's final rankings for RISK and Energy Power & Risk
Management 2000 Commodity Derivatives Rankings.  I thought you might be
interested in the results.

Eric


Hi, Jan!  I hope you are all doing well.  I'm sorry to hear that your mother
is ill.  I'm sure it's frustrating to be so far away.

I know you have other things on your mind right now, but I wanted to check
with you about our visiting this summer.  We were thinking about the second
week in July.  We have not made any definitive plans.  Let me know if that
will work.  If this summer doesn't work, we can always try next summer...

Take care.

Susan


i am always good.  i know the secret.  but i haven't put my good secret to
use lately.


Sally, here is a summary re Peggy Hedstrom.  Once you've communicated her
numbers, you can forward her this or email Janice Christianson and Janice
will get a copy to Peggy.

Thanks....


Dear Valued Customer,

The Enron Creative Center is initiating a comprehensive survey of its customers' satisfaction, and would very much like to include your feedback.  Bowne Business Solutions is proud to be the onsite provider of Enron's graphic services.  I would like to invite you to take a moment to complete a brief survey about the BBS services at Enron.  In order to protect your privacy, BBS has engaged the services of independent market research firm Optimal Edge to manage the project. Your individual identity is guaranteed to be 100% protected, as all responses are accepted anonymously on a secure Web server, where the survey is hosted by CustomerSat, Inc.  We sincerely hope you will take a few minutes to participate, as your feedback and comments will help BBS better understand your needs.

To go to the survey customized for Enron simply click on the following address:

http://www.customersat3.com/s/JuWROetO.asp?IID=uJeePEsEJvbyE

or copy the URL and paste it into your Web browser.  If you need assistance, please e-mail bowne@customersat.com.

Your opinions and satisfaction are very important to us. Thank you very much for your feedback!

Sincerely,

John Zilker
Client Services Manager


When: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 4048

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Note: This presentation will be repeated on Monday 11/12/2001 from 10:30 - 11:30 am.  You will receive that appointment also.  Please accept the time that best fits your schedule. If you have any questions or need to schedule another time please give me a call.

Bobby Mason
713.853.5196
robert.mason@enron.com


This is why the CPUC has opened its recent OII.  The problem now receives
national attention.

Nov 16,2000

California Power Plants Get Jolt
As Natural-Gas Supplies Are Cut

By Rebecca Smith
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

LOS ANGELES -- Southern California power plants, already stressed to their
limits last summer, got another jolt this week as a cold snap caused a sharp
curtailment of supplies of natural gas used to generate electricity.

The power plants were able to switch to burning oil and continue to produce
electricity. But the unusual curtailment of natural gas underlines concerns
that an increased reliance on gas for power generation across the U.S. is
putting the reliability of the nation's electricity supply at risk.

That's because virtually all power plants now under construction in the U.S.
burn gas and only gas. The units affected this week in San Diego were able to
shift to oil only because they were older plants that originally were
constructed to burn oil. Generators have been reluctant to add a dual-fuel
flexibility to plants in recent years because oil is far more polluting than
gas and generally has been costlier.

In California, where gas-supply problems first surfaced on Monday in San
Diego, there is pessimism about a Hydra-like energy crisis that seems to grow
new heads every day. The state weathered three-dozen electrical emergencies
last summer, caused by a shortage of electricity. Officials had hoped to
solve the problem by speeding up construction of new generating plants. Now,
they're finding the state may be building its way out of an electrical
problem and into a gas problem.

One official, who has been warning of the danger of reliance on a single
fuel, said this week's disruption pointed out the necessity of developing a
comprehensive energy policy that recognizes how changes in usage of oil, gas
and electricity affect each other. "We don't just need new generating plants
and transmission lines, we may need pipelines, too," said Terry Winter, chief
executive officer of the California Independent System Operator, the
organization responsible for maintaining adequate electricity supplies.  "You
can't look at these things in isolation."

The natural-gas problems surfaced when the local gas-distribution company,
San Diego Gas & Electric Co., notified power-plant operators and a handful of
industrial users that it would be restricting their gas use by about half. In
California, residential and small businesses have first crack at natural gas,
and industrial uses are regarded as secondary, even if they are generating
plants. Dynegy Inc., the Houston-based energy concern that owns some of the
older plants that serve San Diego, immediately switched to oil. But it didn't
like doing so; its plants create three times as much pollution when  they
burn oil and exhaust valuable air-pollution emission credits that power
plants here need to operate.

The San Diego units couldn't simply be shut down, because the state was short
of power. Roughly 30% of the state's capacity already was off-line, including
many of its nuclear units, as most of those plants are now undergoing repair
after being run at capacity limits throughout the summer.

What's more, the gas-pipeline system that feeds San Diego isn't big enough to
begin with. The system was built primarily to serve residential customers and
not big power plants.

The problems could persist, off and on, through the winter. That's because
gas-storage levels are down sharply from a year ago throughout the nation,
but especially in California, because it ran its gas-fired units so hard last
summer. This time last year, Southern California had 87 billion cubic feet of
gas in storage. Now, it's roughly 50 billion cubic feet, or 43% less. Prices
also have moved up sharply, from roughly $2.50 a million British thermal
units to around $8 this week. Nationally, storage levels are down about 8%
from a year ago.

"Gas is trading higher in California than anywhere else in the nation," said
John Lavorato, chief operating officer of Enron North America, a unit of
Enron Corp. of Houston. But he said they're headed up in the Northeast, based
on cold weather forecast for the next 10 days to two weeks.

High prices for fuel also push up prices for the end product, electricity. In
California the average price for electricity to be delivered Thursday was
$228 per megawatt hour. That's double the price a week ago and five times the
price a year earlier.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
12:09 PM ---------------------------

"Heather Hill" <hhill@houston.rr.com> on 10/24/2000 08:14:35 AM
To: <mike.carson@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Fw: Pictures!

Our little bundle of joy!  He said to tell you that he misses you and can't
wait for you to get home and change his dirty diaper!  I'll save it for you.

Hugs and Kisses,
Me
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nanette Ramsey" <nanette_ramsey@hotmail.com>
To: <hhill@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Pictures!

> Hi kids!  Here are some of the pictures I took on "the night".  Hope you
> three are doing well.  Love you!
>
>
> >From: "Jan Klinger" <jklinger73@hotmail.com>
> >To: nanette_ramsey@hotmail.com, jklinger73@hotmail.com
> >Subject: Pictures!
> >Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:10:43 GMT
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>

 - Dcp00850.jpg
 - Dcp00852.jpg
 - Dcp00853.jpg


<http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/ia_banner02.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	 <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/details.asp?ProductID=971>

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>	  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
	  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_TR.jpg>

SPONSORS

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/main/ad_redirect.asp?URL=http://wwwthestructuregroup.com>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>

INFORMATION PRODUCTS

 <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Generation_Technology_IAs.asp>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Generation_Technology_IAs.asp>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>

CONFERENCES

  <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/main/ad_redirect.asp?URL=http://cpunmsu.edu/>Center for
Public Utilties
The Basics:
Practical Skills for a Changing Utility   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif> <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/New_Rate_Card.asp>   <http://secure.scientech.com/images/spacer.gif>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BL.jpg>		  <http://secure.scientech.com/_IA_TEST/Corner_BR.jpg>

December 17, 2001

Competition Approved for California's Intrastate Natural-Gas Pipelines

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[News item from Associated Press] California state power regulators voted Dec. 11 to deregulate further the transmission of natural gas within Southern California, a decision hailed by the industry and derided by consumer advocates. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted 3-2 to approve a proposal that allows Southern California Gas Co., the nation's largest gas utility, and San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (SDG&E) to sell space on their "backbone" transmission pipelines. These pipelines carry natural gas from out of state to a smaller distribution system in California that then transports it to homes, businesses, factories, and power plants.

Analysis: This controversial vote by the CPUC took place last week, but has not received a great amount of industry analysis. This is rather surprising because the vote carries enormous potential impact for the way in which natural-gas capacity is bought and sold along pipelines owned by Southern California Gas Co. and SDG&E in the southern part of the state. Considering the fiasco that opening the state's electric market became over the last year, it is a risky move for California's regulators to open a competitive market for the right to transport gas along these pipelines at this time, even though the issue has been under debate at the commission for years. However, the rationale for the decision is that the new system will allow customers to better control the point from which their natural-gas supply originates, which theoretically should lower costs and preserve space along the pipelines that the customers don't need. Critics of the plan, especially The Utility Reform Network (TURN), say that allowing competition along the natural-gas pipelines in California could allow fewer companies to control most of the pipeline space, which could in fact cause the opposite of the intended effect and drive up energy costs. A case that has been used by both sides of the debate is that of El Paso Corp., which found itself in a lengthy lawsuit this year when it was charged with giving preferential access to its pipeline to one of its affiliates, which allegedly played a role in driving up energy costs in the state.

Before analyzing the potential impact of the CPUC's ruling, let's first establish specifically what the ruling entails and some background of the companies involved. Put into a nutshell, the ruling creates a competitive market for the right to transport and store natural gas along the pipelines owned by Southern California Gas and SDG&E, which are both subsidiaries of San Diego-based Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE). As noted, Southern California Gas is ranked as the largest natural-gas distribution utility in the country and serves a territory of 23,000-square-miles that ranges from central California to the Mexican border.

Following a standard that is already in place among interstate pipelines, including the ones that transport power into California, both of these companies will now be allowed to sell large industrial customers space on their intrastate "backbone" pipelines, giving customers firm transportation rights on the pipelines. The pipelines are referred to as "backbone" because they are part of the smaller distribution system that transports power to factories and power plants (along with homes and businesses). It is important to note that the CPUC's ruling impacts only large consumers of natural gas in California, which includes electric generating plants. Residential and small business consumers that use natural gas will continue to have regulated gas-transmission costs.

Under the new auction system, power producers and industrial natural-gas customers of the two companies will bid to buy pipeline space, with preference being given to those bidders that intend to reserve space for the longest period of time. According to the CPUC, the ruling creates three "tiers" of accessibility to the capacity on the pipelines. The first tier includes residential and small business customers, who are not included in the new competition and will automatically have about 1,044 million cubic feet per day of capacity on the pipelines reserved for their use. The second tier includes industrial customers who will now be able to participate in the competition, and will be allowed to bid on half of the remaining capacity. The third tier includes all other market participants, including natural-gas marketers, which will be allowed to bid on whatever capacity is left. Both Southern California Gas and SDG&E reportedly intend to phase in auctions by the end of 2002 for their largest customers to transport natural gas. The auctions will be for transmission rights that can be traded to other parties.

The CPUC also established two different levels of payment options for the bidding process. As one option, bidders can pay a fixed price of 7.2 cents per million British thermal units (MMBtu) that would cover all of the capacity on the pipeline that they have reserved, regardless if it is ultimately used or not. As a second option, bidders can pay for only 50 percent of the reserved capacity at the fixed price of 7.2 cents per MMBtu, and 50 percent at a higher price that only applies to the capacity that they ultimately use. In addition, the ruling allows for the trading of capacity space, an important point that critics claim could allow buyers to gain more control over the pipeline than allotted in the ruling.

As noted, the measure passed the CPUC in a 3-2 vote. The ruling will remain in place until 2006, at which time the commission can decide to renew it. The three commissioners that supported the measure were Richard Bilas, Henry Duque and Geoffrey Brown. Loretta Lynch, president of the CPUC, and Carl Wood voted against the measure. Wood said he opposed the measure because it was based on data accumulated before natural-gas prices dramatically increased during the winter of 2000-2001.

Another reason why the three commissioners voted to approve this measure was a belief that deregulating gas transmission in the state would help to keep large customers from leaving intrastate pipelines in favor of using interstate pipelines, which are not regulated by the CPUC. An exodus among industrial users from intrastate pipelines, according to the three commissioners, could leave residential and small business consumers with higher costs associated with maintaining the pipelines. However, regulators were quick to qualify their vote by saying the decision to allow competition for the cost of transporting natural gas for industrial users did not represent total deregulation. Instead, the commissioners said that the ruling simply amounts to "less regulation."

As I mentioned, the case against El Paso Corp. (NYSE: EPG) was used as an example to support both sides of the debate over allowing competition among the natural-gas intrastate pipelines. The case against El Paso Corp. is a very complicated one, but it essentially comes down to one core issue. The case revolves around allegations that during the period of May to November 2000, El Paso improperly shared market-sensitive information with one of its affiliates, which drove up natural-gas prices, pre-empted competition from non-affiliated companies and resulted in extra costs for fuel in the range of $3.7 billion for Californians. El Paso Corp. has consistently maintained that it engaged in no wrongdoing. According to a report issued by the state Assembly, natural-gas prices in California increased from $6.6 billion in 1999 to $12.3 billion in 2000 to $7.9 billion for only the first three months of 2001. In October, El Paso Corp. was absolved of the charges of manipulating natural-gas prices in California, but an investigation continues regarding any improper sharing of information between affiliates. The relevance of this case is that those opposed to opening up California's intrastate pipelines to capacity believe the new rules could allow for one company to step in and gain control over a portion of the pipeline and thereby be able to drive up price.

Those in favor of the CPUC's new ruling say the comparisons to the El Paso case are unfounded. For starters, the ruling restricts companies from owning more than 30 percent of the pipeline, which theoretically should prevent a company from gaining an ability to control prices. Critics, however, say that the ruling allows for the trading of capacity space, which could potentially provide a loophole that would give a company control over more than 30 percent of pipeline capacity.

The issue of potential price spikes associated with natural gas is one of the remaining questions that only time will be able to answer. Critics of the ruling such as TURN say allowing competition among the natural-gas pipelines creates the same market dynamics as deregulation of the state's electricity market, which some say opened the door to gaming and market manipulation. In other words, TURN argues, the CPUC ruling opens the door for one company to enter the market and buy up a significant amount of capacity along the intrastate gas pipelines, thereby giving that company the opportunity to control prices. As the new ruling won't take effect until another year when Southern California Gas and SDG&E begin receiving bids for capacity space on their pipelines, we won't know any time soon if prices will be impacted. However, critics claim that a sharp downturn in temperatures in California during the winter season that drives up demand could be the first indicator of whether or not the new ruling will lead to a sharp increase in energy prices.

Moreover, the opening of competition along capacity space on California's intrastate natural-gas pipelines is a surprising departure from the state's discontinuation of deregulation within the power sector. It is too early to tell how the new ruling will impact energy prices, and of course this question is the source of great debate (with one side saying that prices will drop and the other side saying that prices will increase). Perhaps the larger issue, however, is the control over the state's pipelines that could be impacted by this ruling. Even 30-percent capacity control, the amount that the CPUC is opening to competition, would be considered excessive by some other states. For instance, in Texas 20-percent control is considered a maximum standard. Again, whether or not the allowance of competition will spark the abuse of capacity control on the intrastate pipelines is something that remains to be seen. We do know that electric competition in California became a disastrous experiment, but even with this history the state is moving forward with bringing competition to its intrastate natural-gas pipelines.

An archive list of previous IssueAlert articles is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

  _____

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>at 505.244.7650. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

  _____

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission and distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 505.244.7613.

  _____

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer colleagues to receive our free, daily IssueAlert articles, please register directly on our site at secure.scientech.com/issuealert <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.

  _____

SCIENTECH's IssueAlert(SM) articles are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlert articles is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.
  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=12/17/2001>


Notice #   01-357
October 26,  2001

TO:                   All Members, Staff and Occupants of One North End  Avenue

FROM:             Vincent Viola, Chairman
                          J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

SUBJECT:       On-Going  Air Quality Testing

Air Quality Update

Air quality testing within One North End Avenue has been  and will continue to be the first priority for the management of this  exchange.  The Exchange has engaged  Ambient Group, Inc., an extremely reputable independent laboratory specializing  in this area, to monitor the Exchange's air quality including tests for  transmission electron microscopy (TEM), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons,  Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Anthracene, Benz (a) anthracene, Benzo (a) pyrene,  Benzo (b) fluorathene, Benzo (ghi) perylene, Benzo (k) fluoranthene, Chrysene,  Dibenz (a,h) anthracene, Fluoranthene, Flourene, Indeno (1,2,3 cd) pyrene,  Napthalene, Phenanthrene, Pyrene, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Iron, Lead,  Manganese, Nickel, Silica, and Zinc.   Air quality tests were performed on September 14th, 20  th, 26 th, October 4 th, 9 th, 12  th, 16 th, 18 th, 23 rd, and  26th, and, to date, all results have been well below the EPA, OSHA,  ASHREA, and ACGIH levels.

The Exchange has also taken a pro-active approach on  testing for dangerous chemicals outside the building, as a result of the tragic  events that have occurred in the past six weeks.  Ambient Group, Inc. has secured a  high-volume air sampling monitor (one of only four available to commercial  buildings in New York City) that tests for Benzene, Dioxin, P.C.B.s, as well a  large variety of other air borne chemicals and is based on EPA guidelines.  The Exchange has been testing for these  chemicals for the past few weeks and the first results will be available by next  week.

Going forward, all test results will be posted and made  available to all building occupants on a weekly  basis.

Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to  contact Elliot Zuckerman, property manager, at (212)  299-2242.


The meeting referenced below has been postponed until 3:00pm Eastern /
12:00pm Pacific on Friday, December 15th.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 12/14/2000 11:34 AM
---------------------------

Lysa Akin
12/13/2000 09:07 AM
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert
Anderson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kathy Axford/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jessica Burry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela
Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monika
Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Andy Chen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul
Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chip
Cox/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Smith
L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Heather
Dunton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Caroline Emmert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT,
John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gang/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Winston
Goodbody/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashok Gurusamy/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mollie
Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Johnson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Saji John/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kane/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli
Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristian J Lande/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris
Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mike
McClain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Anna Mehrer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Morris/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susmitha Nalluri/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Kourtney Nelson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lani
Pennington/PDX/ECT@ECT, Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Poston/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mike Purcell/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Rathbun/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald Robinson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Grace
Rodriguez/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Runswick/PDX/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Schweiger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Walter Seaton/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT,
John Shackelford/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G
Slaughter/PDX/ECT@ECT, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geir
Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Van
Houten/PDX/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teri Whitcomb/PDX/ECT@ECT, Collin Whitehead/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Willigerod/PDX/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Theresa Villeggiante/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FERC Meeting Friday, Dec. 15th

We have secured a phone bridge to listen to the special FERC meeting being
held on Friday, Dec. 15th.

I have reserved the Cascade Conference Room for the call.

Please call me Thursday if you have any questions, or see Mary Hain today.

Thank you.

Lysa
x7927


Please see attached file.  If you have any questions, please call me at (713)
345-3858 or (281) 647-0769.


[IMAGE]
NCI Marketing Web Alert

[IMAGE]Phillip

 [IMAGE]   We  make losing weight easy! Our personalized diet plans will guide you  to lose weight and keep it off forever! Stop wishing for  a change!  Your  personalized diet plan includes:    [IMAGE]Customized plans geared for your needs [IMAGE]A personal diet consultant to help guide you [IMAGE]Daily and weekly updates to your diet plan  [IMAGE]State of the art weight loss techniques  [IMAGE]Weekly chats with medical doctors [IMAGE]  and much, much more...     [IMAGE]   Click here  to get started now! 	 [IMAGE]     "Your diet program is so easy. Every time I did another diet I had  to change my life completely. 7StepDiet helped slowly change my life for  the better and helped me lose weight quickly." -Beth G.  "Your  stress relief area is wonderful. I don't know what I would do without  it. Each day I just follow one your stress relief tips and I feel 100%  more relaxed and confident? not to mention, I lost over 10 pounds  in my first week!" -Sandra K.  [IMAGE]

 You are receiving this special offer because you have provided permission to receive third party email communications regarding special online promotions or offers. If you do not wish to receive any further messages from Network Commerce, please click here  to unsubscribe. Any third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator. Copyright ? 2001 Network Commerce Inc.


Suzanne:
Please send this to Scott Sefton and call the Bracewell person and tell them
that he is now in charge of this matter.  I haven't had anything to do with
this file since I joined the swap group.  Thanks.

Everything is fine.  Still on a hectic schedule but getting a little more
sleep.  We take the baby to the pediatrician on Thursday for his first
checkup and I go for mine on Friday.  I've started walking again and some
very, very slow jogging (don't tell Bill this).  I feel really good and
everything seems to be healing okay.  I've actually cooked a few meals!  I
will try to call you in the next day or two.  We've been taking the baby out
on short trips in the afternoon just to get out of the house.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Suzanne Adams
	07/25/00 02:32 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Invoice

Carol, you received an invoice from Bracewell for the Chase Manhattan Bank in
connection with 4th Amend to JEDI II credit agreement.  What should I do with
it?  Give it to Mark to approve?  Please advise?

How are things going?


Ava, Regular time for me.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Zadow, Raetta; Barry, Patrick; Blair, Jean; Bryan, Randy; Callans, Nancy; Carr, James; Clapper, Karen; Perry, Renee; Porter, Diana; Walden, Shirley; Washington, Kathy; Wilkens, Jerry; Aldinger, William; Collins, Marion; Conklin, Jacob; Coon, Galen; Cooper, Tim; Cramer, James; Howard, Jack; Laferla, Lynda ; Phillips, Mary; Rivers, Cynthia; Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Hibbard, Scott; Janzen, Randy; Linhart, Joe; McDaniel, Janet; Scurlock, Debra; Sturr, Kathy; Vaughan, Cara; Woodson, Harry; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	Timesheets

Timesheets are due Wednesday, October 31st please try to turn in timesheets before deadline.

Thanks,
Ava

 << File: BlankTimesheet(30).doc >>


Do you have time Tuesday? I need to start talks with Lonestar.
Gary Bryan


I've gotten a bit more educated about IT revenue crediting since you asked
your question yesterday.  "IT revenue crediting" is an industry term used to
describe a requirement (brought about either by a FERC order or a rate case
settlement) that IT revenues in excess of a certain dollar amount will be
credited back to all firm shippers in the next rate proceeding or thru some
refund mechanism.  Transwestern is currently not under any IT revenue
crediting obligation, and I would be very hesitant to negotiate any such
obligation with any individual shipper because then we would have to do the
same for all firm shippers on a nondiscriminatory basis.

If you need more info, let's talk.


Enron Global Strategic Sourcing (GSS) has entered into an agreement to
utilize United Parcel Service (UPS) as Enron,s preferred carrier for package
delivery.  Through the new agreement, GSS has been able to leverage existing
package delivery spend from all Enron business units worldwide in order to
achieve more aggressive pricing discounts.  Effective immediately, all Enron
business units will be able to realize savings by utilizing the new agreement.

In the next couple weeks, GSS will be distributing more detailed information
regarding additional shipping options, training schedules and package
tracking capabilities available from your desktop. In the meantime, employees
and/or locations who currently utilize &Package and Ship Requests8 may
continue to do so.  Please provide all required information, including RC and
Company Number and identify UPS as the requested carrier.  Other office
locations should continue using their existing procedures, utilizing UPS
whenever possible, to obtain the discounted pricing.

If you have questions or comments about the new agreement, please contact
Randy Lagrimini, GSS contract manager at 713-646-7366 or Verna Molandes, UPS
preferred customer associate at 281-847-6769 or 1-800-432-2877.


Jim / Karen - Thank you.

We are not going to pull the trigger to turn back these customers without a
full review and the agreement of all appropriate teams at Enron.

Thanks - Dan

Karen Denne@ENRON
04/13/2001 12:30 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL - Residential in CA

Before any decision is made, I think we really need to weigh in with EES on
the ramifications (both PR and legislative) of turning back 16,000
residential customers.  I strongly believe that the public hit we will take
will be far greater than our actual out-of-pocket losses.  We will be
crucified by the public, media, consumer groups, legislators, governor,
attorney general, etc.,  and this action will reaffirm our reputation of
packing up and leaving when it's not in our interest.  The impact of this
action would be exacerbated since it is on the heels of UC/CSU.

I would also argue that this hurts our national dereg efforts.  If we're
advocating that competition and choice benefits consumers and then we turn
around and pull out of a market and abandon customers when we're not
"profiting," we'll kill any chances we have of ever serving retail customers
in California -- or in any other state.  We look foolish advocating for
direct access when we're not willing to serve our existing -- let alone
future customers

What about a preemptive strike that engages these 16,000 customers to weigh
in on direct access -- i.e. a letter that says "Enron may be forced to cancel
its contract -- call/write/send the enclosed postcard to your legislator and
tell them you want to keep your right to choose your energy service provider."

Our credibility is on the line.  Before we take this action, we need to be
cognizant of all the long-range strategic implications, and we need to
seriously weigh the negative impact this will have on our corporate
reputation, on our legislative abilities and on our commercial success going
forward.

kd

James D Steffes
04/12/2001 09:05 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: CONFIDENTIAL - Residential in CA

In the meeting today, no decision was made about what to do with Enron's
16,000 residential customers.   Each of the contracts gives a basic 30 day
out right to Enron.

That being said, I think that we have a short window to push for DA before
any public action impacts us in Sacramento.

I realize that the ultimate action (which I think is inevitable) makes it
harder for our advocacy on DA, but real $ are flowing out of the company.

EES will give us notice when a decision is reached.

Thanks,

Jim


Group,

Our deal with EES has changed. As Ryan indicated in his email we are now charging $3 for EES up to 100 mws, above 100 mws to  200 mws we are charging $4, above 200 mws per hour we are charging $5.  However, when we have transacted with EES for a peaker product or day-ahead schedule we will not integrate our fee into their price for that quanity of mws. I will indicate in an email to you when this occurs. This is a bit complex but if you have questions just let me know.

Also, EnMax has recently been buying energy from us at the BC Border. This turned out to be a "Canadian" firm purchase on the part of Enmax. Please do not fill any sale to EnMax with MPC energy. We need to treat EnMax just like ECC. We should buy an option or a call and then exercise that option. MPC does not have this capability and should not be used in this manner.

Finally, the NW evening peak has arrived. The NW has been extremely tight through morning and evening peaks, often over $30 to pick up...

Any questions, just let me know.

Thanks,
Bill


Happy Holidays Everyone !!!!!!!!

The career centers holiday hours will be from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm for the
time period 12/17 to 12/21, closed from 12/24 to 1/2,  open 9:00 am to 4:00
pm  from 1/3 to 1/18.  Starting the week of 1/22 we will be back on the
regular schedule MTW 8:30 am to 8:15 pm, Thur. 8:30 am to 6:00 pm and
Fridays 8:30 am to 4:30 pm.


Przepraszam, ze tak dlugo nie odpowiadalem. Nasz team mial zaplanowany
wspolny wieczor w piatek, ale nic nie bylo pewne, poniewaz mamy duzo osob sie
rozchorowalo. Z tegoz powodu wieczor zostal odwolany, a ja jestem wolny.
Jesli nadal nie ma Pan planow na piatkowy wieczor, to ja jestem jak
najbardziej za spotkaniem.

J

Vince J Kaminski
12/19/2000 10:05 AM
To: Julius Zajda/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Lunch

Juliusz,

Sorry, I have to cancel the lunch meeting today.

Pleas, give a call sometimes today. Maybe we can meet for drinks Friday
afternoon.

I am taking the next week off.

Vince

Julius Zajda
12/19/2000 09:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Lunch

Dzien dobry,

Mam nadzieje, ze nic sie nie zmienilo i jestesmy umowieni na dziesiejszy
lunch. Proponuje sie spotkac o godzinie 12.00 na parterze obok biurka
"security ladies" (bo wiem gdzie to jest). Ubrany jestem w czarne spodnie,
bezowe buty i szara bluze. Nie jestem pewien czy bede mogl przeczytac
potwierdzenie, bo od 10 do 11.45 przeprowadzam szkolenie.

Juliusz


RAO,
Thanks for inserting the AEPC acronym to distinguish AEP Central in the P&L.
If possible, please change the acronym to read  "AEP-CTRL."  This change will
make it easier to distinguish this counterparty in the P & L.  Thanks.