---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------

"iris mack" <irismmack@hotmail.com> on 11/23/2000 01:13:26 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: F/U to Dr. Kaminski @ Enron from Iris Mack

Hi again,

Here is the second document:

2.  The second word document describes a hybrid derivatives structure I I
workded on at BNP Paribas.  It has applications to the energy industry.

Regards,
Iris

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - Real Options Business Specs, Part I.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/23/2001 01:58
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/23/2001 01:51:18 PM
To: "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>, <Bill.Williams@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement

Attached please find the latest LV Cogen Turbine Agreement (first
document below) that incorporates the changes received from Dale on
April 17, as well as a blackline (second document below) showing changes
made to the version circulated on April 10. As I mentioned in my prior
e-mail, the April 17 comments referred to an earlier version that
referenced Turbines no longer in this deal. As a result, I only changed
the Guaranteed Delivery Date for Unit 24. To complete the agreement, we
will need to insert the date of execution and Exhibit H-2.
 <<LV Cogen Gas Turbine Agreement - Version 4.DOC>>  <<LV COGEN TURBINE
AGREEMENT - VERSION 3 TO 4.DOC>>
 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Agreement - Version 4.DOC
 - LV COGEN TURBINE AGREEMENT - VERSION 3 TO 4.DOC


- MVC-587L.jpg


Correction,

Jack welch is the CEO of GE, not GM.

Vince Kaminski

  The eThink Team
From: eThink@ENRON on 07/05/2000 08:08 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: eSpeak Survey: The results are in!

We recently asked you to create an eSpeak "wish list" for us.  The response
was tremendous and, in some cases, very creative.  Your fellow employees
asked for everyone from Britney Spears to George Bush.  In all, we received
requests for 61persons outside of Enron to host an eSpeak event.  We thought
you might like to know who your colleagues find interesting, so we've
provided a sampling of the suggestions below.  Here are the top ten most
requested eSpeakers.

10.  Jack Welch, CEO, General Motors
9.  Scott McNeally, CEO, Sun Microsystems
8.  Satisfied Enron Customers
7.  Stephen Covey, author, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People
6.  Oprah Winfrey, talkshow host
5.  General Colin Powell, former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S.A.
4.  Alan Greenspan, Chairman, Federal Reserve, U.S.A.
3.  Former U.S. President George Bush
2.  Bill Gates, CEO, Microsoft
1.  Texas Governor George W. Bush

While we can't make any promises, we will do our best to bring in at least
some of these special guests.  If you have any contacts who could help us get
in touch with these guest speakers, please let us know at ethink@enron.com.
Everybody needs a little help now and then, even eSpeak.

There were plenty of internal speakers requested, as well.  Those requests
should be somewhat easier to meet, although scheduling time with some of our
colleagues can be quite a task!

Thank you all for your participation.


Yes, thanks - I think Tana is going to call to get some help interpreting the
numbers.

Rudi Zipter
01/27/2000 07:42 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Useful?

Mark,

Was the market data on gas and power volumes useful to your project?

Rudi


505118
term should be 26-27

missing deal just like deal 505118

505223 price should be 300.00

misssing 2 deals for bob, will get details.

thanks


This request has been pending your approval for  30 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000079989&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000079989
Request Create Date : 12/26/01 9:53:43 AM
Requested For       : brian.redmond@enron.com
Resource Name       : eConnect - VPN  Tier 2 - Full Access
Resource Type       : Applications


corp_logo.gif (4229 bytes)         Roundarch Building Blocks Newsletter Issue 3, January 2002   Contents Who We Are  CRM Talk Back  Did You Know?  In This Issue: Content Management and its importance to your Portal Strategy    What is Content Management?   5 Challenges to Content Management Implementation   10 Problems in Existing Enterprises that Content Management Applications Can Resolve   5 Things to Ask Vendors When Selecting a Content Management Product   Critical Steps to Developing Your Content Management Solution   The Bottom Line: Content Management Value Propositions   Problem Solved: Content Management in Enterprise Portal Case Studies   Roundarch Website Polling Stats  Homework: Books and Links of Interest  What's Going On: Events and Conferences   Roundarch Contact Information      Who We Are Roundarch helps organizations realize superior financial results by designing, building, and supporting profitable customer relationships. As the world's first Customer Relationship Architects, Roundarch combines strategy, marketing, and technology professionals with formalized assets that truly jump-start and accelerate the solution development process. Roundarch's unique StartAhead? approach reduces the time and risk of implementing a customer relationship solution by pre-selecting and pre-integrating market leading ideas, technologies and specialists. Founded by marketing and systems integration leaders WPP Group (NASDAQ: WPPGY), Deloitte Consulting, and BroadVision (NASDAQ: BVSN), Roundarch is equipped with best of breed consulting skills, agency expertise, and technology know-how.    CRM Talk Back Lessons Learned - Holiday Shopping on the Net 2001  This year I decided to purchase all of my Holiday gifts on the Internet - even down to the wrapping paper and tape.  By using sites that offered free shipping or deep discounts I was able to save over $100 dollars by not paying sales tax and I got to avoid the malls.  The following represents my Top Ten Observations:  Be prepared to turn your home into a warehouse! I ordered over 20 items from Amazon that resulted in 12 large boxes.  Why does Barbie need her own box that could easily hold a DVD player?   Consolidating orders could work for me, even if it meant a slight delay in arrival. Pet peeve number 1 - After many hours of "browsing" items and comparing prices, I settled on an item.   Three days later I received an email saying that the item was out of stock.   This reminded me of retail bait and switch tactics.  If you don't have the product, take it off your site! Pet peeve number 2 - Customer service representatives who don't have information about your online order.   If you are going to sell online you need to service your online customers.   The days of being able to say - "I will research this and get back to you" are over.  Companies need to empower their front line personnel with data.   It's too easy for me just to place my next order with the competition. Pet peeve number 3 - Let me track my package.  Those sites that do not allow tracking of orders cost company more money.  It means you had to place numerous calls to their service department to check on delivery status. Pet peeve number 4 - Shopping carts that "lock up".  When this happens I not only abandon my order, I abandon doing business with the company. Great stuff number 1 - After placing an order some companies sent me an email with a discount gift certificate to use on my next order.  This "25%" sent me rushing back to the site, which built customer loyalty. Great stuff number 2 - Payal.  When buying on eBay, this service allows you to email funds directly to the seller.  No money order, no checks, and the funds can come right out of your checking or saving accounts.  It's a great way to do business and it's free. Great stuff number 3 - There are a few things that really stand out on some sites.  Here they are:   Allowing the customer to "search" the site - seems so simple - but not everyone has the capability.  Pre-filled forms.  When I go back to a site to place another order it's great when my shipping and billing information is already there.   It saves me time and also increases my loyalty. Great stuff number 4 - Comparison-shopping for price.  Sites like mysimon.com and cnet.com allowed me to find the best deals.  The price and shipping rates differ in such a big way from company to company - a great tool especially for electronics. Internet shopping has come a long way.  Those companies that make it easy to do business with them have a great advantage.  However, that advantage is quickly lost when the user experience comes up short in the service area.  Companies that respond to emails, and can answer customer questions over the phone help to bridge the gap between the expectations of the customer and the experience the customer has.  As companies strive to create their brand and the need to "arm" their sites and customer service organization with best of breed technology becomes critical.  I will gladly spend my money with the company but they have to give me a reason to not spend it with their  competitor.  What was the last Internet customer service experience you had?  Did the company go out of its way to satisfy you? Or was it just the opposite? We want to hear from you.  Please emaileuffer@roundarch.com  with your story.   Did You Know?  [IMAGE]  In This Issue: Content Management and Its Importance to your Portal Strategy  What is Content Management?   Content Management is defined as the people, processes and the systems that organizations use to create, store, update and distribute its key information and intellectual assets.   Although this definition may vary, the key concepts do not change across organizations.  It has become very apparent in the marketplace that with the proliferation of portal and web sites the content management challenge is becoming an increasing focus in large organizations.  Clients are more and more driving technology decisions based on content management requirements as opposed to portal needs.   Forrester defines Enterprise Content Management as "an integrated approach to managing documents, Web content and digital assets".  This is the broadest sense of content management.  One way to gain a clear picture of the term "content management" is to consider the various segments of the content life cycle.  The most pertinent segments to content management are:  Content Creation - Includes creation/revision, collaboration, review and approval.  The review and approval process can utilize workflow built into content management applications.  Content Maintenance - Includes content storage, access control and version control.  Content that has been created and approved is stored in a repository or database.  This content can then be combined with other approved content items to create rich sets of information.  Additionally, previous versions of content items are maintained and can be accessed at any time to bring back a previous state of information without introducing rework.  Content Delivery/Distribution - Includes the deployment of approved content from repository to an information channel.  Stored content can be aggregated and deployed to any number of channels (web, print, call center, wireless device etc.) utilizing specifically defined formats.  This is called channelization and is one of the major benefits to content management.  Content Management streamlines the process of creating, managing and delivering content, and puts processes in place to manage and control information as it is moved across the enterprise and to customers through the various information channels.  Historically, content management systems have not addressed all segments but rather focused  specifically on one or two.  Some systems may focus more on content creation, format and delivery (Web Content Management) whereas others may be more focused on storage and maintenance of documents and other forms of unstructured content (Document Management Systems).   Fortunately, content management solutions are maturing and  these two worlds are starting to converge to better serve the entire enterprise.  Not everyone is there but the future is bright and therefore, consideration to the type of content that is to be managed is important input into making a decision on the system that will best serve an organization's needs.  As content management matures and addresses the enterprise in a more holistic manner, organizations must consider the change to the enterprise that must take place to realize the benefits of such systems.   Content creation is no longer limited to a few but can be distributed among many with little or no technical skills.  Content approval and distribution can be handled programmatically in addition to manually and will require careful consideration to future roles and processes.  With so much change it is important to leadership to embrace the idea of content management by recognizing the importance of managing that will most certainly take place.  This may include  conducting a change readiness assessment and a change management plan.  Additionally, it is also important for leadership to have clear buy-in so that the organization understands the importance of the many steps that will be required to take on the road to content management.  5 Challenges to Content Management Implementation  Enterprises have complex workflows to move information across departments, but limited control or collaboration on how that information is edited, managed, published or retired - resulting in inconsistencies across the enterprise and customers. Conversion is a major undertaking of any Content Management implementation and requires a solid understanding of existing content and how to best organize it to improve efficiencies.   This requires an assessment of structured vs. unstructured content to understand how content will be organized and if more structure is required. Globalization increases the complexity of the entire content lifecycle, as multiple versions of content assets must be managed in addition to translation.  Additionally, support of multiple languages requires applications that can handle the required character sets and becomes important when selecting software packages. Defining the appropriate content attributes (meta tags).  Attributes define the meaning of content and are integral to good organization and appropriate personalization. Integration with Enterprise Applications can present challenges to the development effort.  This is especially true if the Content Management does not have a pre-built interface.  10 Problems in Existing Enterprises that Content Management Applications Can Resolve  As content assets increase in number, it becomes more and more difficult for content authors and administrators to find a single piece of content they are looking for, compounding confusion and efficiency. Increasing number of authors can quickly cause version control and communication issues.  As an enterprise expands nationally or even globally, this issue can quickly be  compounded by access limitations. Abandoned protocol (manual approval processes being ignored). Authors with no technical skills depend on technical resources to get content published to the appropriate locations.  This can create a bottleneck at the development team and cause significant delays to getting current information out to customers. Changes to web content may be required daily, hourly or even every minute.  This can quickly become and impossible task for a web master or group of content managers who are manually making changes and deploying content to various media. Management of multiple types of content assets (texts, graphics, multimedia etc.) is almost impossible to organize and deploy efficiently without the programmatic organization of content management application. Where different media (print, web, wireless, etc.) are supported separately, it is often difficult to maintain consistency of content due to development time a resource availability. Departmental ownership of content. Client participation.   Ongoing ownership and support requires the client to be involved from beginning to end. Maintaining control of project scope is always challenging, especially when dealing with relatively new technology such as content management systems.  This is quickly compounded as applications to integrate with are added to the plan.  Scope control can be maintained and expectations can be managed with a thorough definition of the project up front.   5 Things To Ask Vendors When Selecting a Content Management Product  What enterprise applications do you integrate with/have partnerships with? What unique capabilities does your product provide over your competitor's? How customizable is your product? Does your product support standards based programming (Java, XML)? How long has this product been out and how many customers have implemented it to date?  Critical Steps to Developing Your Content Management Solution:  Conduct a 3-4 week project to confirm the content management and conversion requirements, assess the current capability, develop client specific value proposition and develop a project roadmap for a rollout of content management solution.  The activities in this discovery effort include:  Content inventory - content type, frequency of updates, formats, source Content management workflow - number of people/departments authoring content, business processes and roles for authoring, editing, approval and publishing content Content conversion requirements - amount of legacy content, types of formats, structured or unstructured content, technical approach (e.g. bulk conversion programs, manual conversion, etc.) Repurposing of content - publish to multiple media formats (e.g. web, wireless, pdf, paper) Integration to the portal - identify prototype data model and build estimate for integration to portal engine Develop client specific value proposition for the content management solution and identify tangible benefits   The Bottom Line: Content Management Value Propositions  Closes the gap to the goal of the 'extended enterprise', where organizations work closely together  Provides a single content repository to store content that can be repurposed, thus eliminating the duplication of effort for creating the same content for multiple channels (Websites, Portal, Extranets/Intranets, Wireless, Print)  Provides business user the power to manage content  Enables efficient communications across the enterprise  Presents dynamic and relevant content to the constituent user  Provides corporations with the ability to reach global audience with a localized message  An embedded workflow facilitates content creation and editorial process, which increases the business unit's commitment to quality and accountability  Provides content assurance - share proprietary content with partners and suppliers  Provides capabilities for authors in different geographies to create, update, and publish content  Separates the content from the application logic  Rapid development to keep pace with information updates on various mediums  Problem Solved: Content Management in Enterprise Portal Case Studies  The State of California needed a content management system that would allow its communications department to rapidly deploy new content and features without the intervention of technical staff, yet maintain control over the content creation and deployment processes through workflow.  Roundarch implemented and integrated a content management solution that answered this need, and put in place an infrastructure that empowered the State to quickly disseminate information to constituents on the My California portal.  For information, contact Paula Itagaki pitagaki@roundarch.com  or Dan Loos dloos@roundarch.com  or go to www.ca.gov .  A Blue Cross Blue Shield Company wanted a content management solution that demonstrated seamless integration with its portal solution, strong tagging capabilities to target public and secure content to specific constituents, and a simple content entry interface that put the power of content in the hands of business users.  Roundarch developed a single content management solution that provided centralized content creation and publishing processes to deliver personalized content for providers, members, and employers.  For more information, contact Paula Itagaki  pitagaki@roundarch.com  or Manish Bharadwaj  mbharadwaj@roundarch.com .  This company is a leading global supplier of cement, aggregate, and concrete.  Roundarch developed the global content management solution and commerce site that uses six languages, three currencies, and integrates to different ERP systems.  Business users rather than the IT department maintain site content.  With the new streamlined content management workflow established all the content is reviewed and approved before it is published. For more information, contact Ray Paty rpaty@roundarch.com .    Roundarch Website Polling Stats  During the periodof November 29 - December 9th, 2001, visitors to the Roundarch website were asked:     "Have you ever switched service companies due to poor customer service? i.e. banks, transportation, telecommunications, insurance, financial services?"  Never  3%   Once  9%   A few times  52%   Many times  36%   During the period of December 10th- 31st, 2001, visitors to the Roundarch website were asked:     "When you contact a call center, which scenario aggravates you most?  Not being able to solve your problem or answer your question  24%   Being put on hold  12%   No way to reach operator  27%   Being told to call another number  37%   To participate in the current CRM question of the week, go to the Roundarch website.     Homework  Books of Interest:  Content Management Bible -- Bob Boiko  Web Content Management: A Collaborative Approach -- Russell Nakano  .NET Content Management Systems Development (With CD-ROM) -- Stephen Fraser   Links of Interest:   CRM Guru.com  Delphi Group  RealMarket  Tech Republic  Strategy+Business     What's Going On: Events and Conferences  Call Center & CRM Solutions - Las Vegas 2002 February 11-13, 2002 Las Vegas Convention Center Las Vegas, Nevada  Roundarch  will be participating in Avanstar's Call Center and CRM Solutions Las  Vagas 2002 Conference and Expo where we will be showcasing our Enabling  Technology Platform solution and discussing related case studies.   For more information or to register, call (800) 854-3112 or go to www.cc-crmvegas.com .  Roundarch Contact Information:   Roundarch Corporate Headquarters 350 North LaSalle, 12th Floor  Chicago, IL 60610 Phone: 312 529-2400 Fax: 312 529-3400 http://www.roundarch.com/    To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit the newsletter section  of the Roundarch website.   Copyright Roundarch, 2002


I am sorry I did not understand your message. You must have been in San
Antonio. Brad


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 09/29/2000 06:06 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/27/2000 02:32 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Who Pays for Deregulation?

 Who Pays for Deregulation? Pam Kufahl ? 09/30/2000 Utility Business
Copyright 2000 by Intertec Publishing Corporation, a PRIMEDIA Company. All
rights reserved.

As the gas and telecom industries can demonstrate, deregulation does not
always live up to its promise.

In San Diego these days, consumers are cursing the day they ever heard about
electricity deregulation. As customers of San Diego Gas&Electric can attest,
deregulation has yet to live up to its promise.

Just after San Diego Gas&Electric President Edwin A. Guiles announced a $390
million dividend for customers as a result of the company's successful
transition to a competitive marketplace, the utility's customers were hit
with their highest electric bills this year. Many of those bills were two to
three times higher than the preceding month's bill.

The San Diego saga has left many consumers, utility industry leaders and
policymakers around the country wondering about the future of efforts to shed
decades of industry regulation. All are wondering whether deregulation can
work - and whether benefits can broadly flow. They are watching intently as
Californians sort their way through the shambles of the state's early
deregulation efforts. Some industry insiders suggest these higher prices will
spread to other deregulated states in the future.

Concerns about deregulation's effects on customers began even before this
summer's events. Natural gas prices have been increasing since late 1997. The
increases haven't been as noticeable on winter gas bills because winters
throughout much of the country have been mild. However, drilling slowed
starting in 1997, and natural gas reserves have dwindled to two-thirds of
what they will need to be by Nov. 1. Utilities were purchasing gas during the
summer to build up their reserves for winter. In addition, the high summer
temperatures meant utilities ate into their existing reserves to generate
more electricity.

Despite deregulation, residential gas customers may not be seeing as large of
a decrease in their gas bills as commercial and industrial customers for a
simple reason. Restructuring of the gas industry ended the cross subsidies
that residential customers were receiving. While deregulation lowered their
gas rates, the loss of these subsidies increased costs a bit. The result was
that their savings were less than the savings of larger customers who never
benefited from cross subsidies, according to Bruce B. Henning, director,
energy practice at Energy and Environmental Analysis in Arlington, Va.

The telecom industry has been deregulated for several years. While
residential rates have decreased in that industry, the highest volume users
and business customers have benefited the most from deregulation.

The electric industry has followed suit so far. As the power industry is
deregulated, utilities will have no choice but to serenade larger commercial
and industrial customers, according to a February 2000 report by Dr. Eugene
Coyle, independent economic counsel. The cost to go into a new area and
market to new customers is so high while the return on residential customers
is so low that the pursuit of residential customers just may not be worth it
for non-incumbent utilities. This could mean that residential customers will
be left out of the opportunities for electric deals that larger, power-hungry
commercial and industrial customers are offered, according to the report,
which was released by the American Public Power Association.

Besides targeting customers who use the most power, energy providers will
market to those who have more disposable income, which translates into the
ability to buy bundled offerings. Customers who don't fit into these areas
will be ignored, Coyle says.

Kyle Datta, vice president and head of the utilities practice at consulting
firm Booz Allen&Hamilton, doesn't agree completely with Coyle's predictions.
"If you look at the customer base, there's certain commercial and industrial
customers that are more profitable," Datta says. "They [utilities] will take
actions to retain them. Those that are unprofitable they will keep, but they
won't spend as much money marketing to them."

Besides, Datta says, it just makes good business sense to offer discounts or
special services to retain the most profitable customers. However, utilities
understand their social obligation to provide power and will not drop
customers, he says.

Don't tell that to customers of DTE Energy Co., a deregulated energy
marketing company that served residential and business customers in the
Northeast. The company recently closed its DTE Edison America affiliates in
New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

"We believe that we have learned enough to conclude that the competitive
residential and small commercial mass market is not profitable in this early
stage of development," Jean M. Redfield, president, DTE Edison America, said
in a statement released by the company. "A fully deregulated market with
large numbers of residential and small business customers
participating...remains at least a couple of years away."

The company did not close its DTE Energy Marketing affiliate in the same
states. That affiliate markets electricity and related energy services to
industrial, commercial and institutional customers.

However, sometimes, deregulation doesn't even pay for large commercial and
industrial customers. In California, some energy retailers have withdrawn
from the market, while others have been shedding customers. Commonwealth
Energy of Tustin and AES New Energy of Los Angeles, two new entrants into the
California market, recently had to drop more than 18,000 customers -
primarily commercial and industrial customers in the state. The two companies
have said that the rules of deregulation in California have made it too
difficult for them to compete. Commonwealth Energy had amassed 95,000
customers in the area and notified the 18,000 that it could no longer sell
them electricity. AES New Energy, which serves mainly large businesses,
notified more than half of its 220 customers of the same thing. In
California, 15.9 percent of industrial customers and 7.2 percent of large
businesses have chosen new suppliers. Only 2 percent of residential customers
in the state have switched.

However, residential customers still find it more difficult to benefit from
deregulation. In most markets, new entrants can't make much money on
residential loads under the current rules unless they sell a bundle of
products - power, gas, telecom, financial service offerings - to make their
marketing investment worthwhile.

"They must sell a large number of products to residential customers because
electricity is a low-margin product," Datta says. "You have to offer a
discount and by the time you offer a discount, then the spread between the
actual price and the wholesale price is too great. So, you have to find
higher-margin products" such as telecom.

Pennsylvania's Condition Pennsylvanians are closely watching the situation in
California. The state deregulated in 1999. About 10 percent or 500,000
customers in Pennsylvania are being served by alternative providers - and
400,000 of those are residential customers. The state has imposed rate caps
to help ensure that residential customers can't be harmed by volatile prices.
Some of the caps extend through 2010.

"It is important that we have the rate caps," says Sonny Popowsky, consumer
advocate of Pennsylvania. In addition, all incumbent utilities in
Pennsylvania agreed to rate reductions of 3 percent to 8 percent for about
one to two years.

"To me, one of the most important issues was to make sure you didn't see a
cost shifting to residential customers," Popowsky says. "We took steps to
prevent that. Whether it works remains to be seen."

Is "Going Public" the Answer? Some consumer groups are calling for a slow
down or repeal of deregulation in California, warning that higher rates will
occur in other deregulated states in the future. Harvey Rosenfield, president
of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, says that deregulation
just creates an unregulated monopoly. He calls deregulation "the most
monumental mistake ever committed by public officials."

"We're all going to pay for the greed of this industry unless we go back to
public control over our utility system," Rosenfield said in a statement
released by the organization. Calls for public control echo Coyle's February
report. Coyle argues that with a cost structure like that of the electric
industry, there has to be public control either through regulation or public
ownership.

"The picture isn't good unless there's some type of public intervention,"
says Coyle.

But another answer may lie in aggregation. An American Public Power
Association report, "Promoting Competitive Electricity Markets Through
Community Purchasing: the Role of Municipal Aggregation," says that
residential and small business consumers must be equipped with the kind of
bargaining power that large consumers have in order to reap equal benefits
from deregulated electricity markets. Municipal aggregation programs can
provide these small consumers with enough market weight to capture the
economic benefits they are missing. Some residential groups are giving this
option a try. Public housing authorities in many cities are putting together
consortiums to bid for energy for its members. In March, 21 towns and two
counties, representing 185,000 electricity customers, came together as the
aggregated group Cape Light Compact and chose a mutual power supplier.

Online services, such as LowerMyBills.com may also provide answers to
residential customers. Sites like this one help customers to find the least
expensive provider of services including electricity, gas, telecom, cable TV
and insurance.

While consumer groups may complain about high rates and some industry
insiders may project a darker future for residential customers, other experts
saythe current situation is just a matter of a newly deregulated industry
experiencing growing pains.

"Over the long term, competition is an effective way of disciplining prices,"
says Henning. "In the long term, economists look at restructuring as a way to
keep rates down."

Competition should live up to its promise of lower rates for everyone, but
residential customers may have to resign themselves to the fact that
larger-volume users will see greater savings from deregulation than they
will. It's only good business sense on the part of the service providers.
Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation Relevance Score on Scale of
100: 98______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


P.S. I almost have the 6/22 list done.  There is one more counterparty
credit/power is working on.  And I have the 6/23 and 6/26 lists done, I just
have to write them up.  I'll have them to you soon.


Thanks for the reminder.  I just faxed a confirmation for Dick Jenkins,
Direcotor, Enron North America.

"Lori Rauser" <lori_rauser@iroquois.com> on 04/25/2000 08:39:12 AM
Please respond to lori_rauser@iroquois.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: R.S.V.P. for 6th Annual Iroquois Producers & Marketers Focus Group

Good Morning-

This is a reminder that tomorrow is the final date to R.S.V.P. to the
6th Annual Producers & Marketers Focus Group Meeting in Phoenix, AZ June
5-8, 2000.

Please R.S.V.P. by completing your Reply Card and faxing it to Lori
Rauser at (203) 929-9501.  If you have any questions regarding this
event please contact Robin Almond at (203) 925-7274.

We look forward to seeing you in Arizona!

Lori Rauser
Administrative Support
Marketing & Transportation Department


Please excuse the long e-mail below - I knew we'd never get a chance to all get together, and this is somewhat urgent as I have to complete the Finance Committee presentation for the upcoming BOD meeting by the end of next week, and it will include trading results for the 1st quarter, reported in accordance with the risk management policy.  Due to issues noted below, this may require immediate attention by your staff as we have a few short days to come up with the best quality numbers we can.  I talked to Beth already, and MRM met with Chris Abel's group to see if there was a short cut, but our joint conclusion was that the business unit controllers need to be involved in this process as you are the experts on your businesses and can apply the best judgment to decide on the trading results to be reported to the BOD.  We'll probably need to go with our best estimate of 3/30 #s as of end of the day next Tuesday or Wednesday at the latest.

As you recall, the February 12th BOD meeting resulted in a clarification that the BOD approved trading limits were limits on the generic commodity groups defined, and accordingly the trading results must be reported consistent with that limit structure (management reporting can be different of course).  Chris Abel's global energy operations group has prepared a "RAC" DPR that attempts to aggregate the commodity groups in accordance with the risk management policy, so that top management and the BOD can see Enron's exposure to individual commodities on a consolidated basis.    (A)  This DPR will not impact actual sharing of P/L from a management reporting/business unit perspective - this is purely for market risk management purposes and reporting to the BOD.  But commercial management will need to review and sign off on the RAC DPR and monitor limits accordingly, as these limits are at an Enron level.

The specific trading results we need for the BOD presentation are the first quarter P/L and average daily VaR, by commodity group.  The first RAC DPR available is as of 3/30 - so while it has cumulative P/L, VaR is only as of  3/30.  (Note - we're also comparing to 1Q 2000, but we're not going to attempt to resolve cross-commodity reporting for that period except at a high level).

Your participation is needed in resolving: 1) cross-commodity reporting per the new RAC DPR - both retroactively for the 1st quarter, and going forward, and 2) ROVAR (return on average daily VaR by commodity group) for the 1st quarter.  This aggregation of cross-commodity activity has been completed by Chris as of 3/30, so he has what he believes to be P/L aggregated for the quarter in accordance with the policy. What we don't have is VaR on a daily basis as the first time it was calculated on an aggregated basis was on 3/30.  Obviously we're not going to be able to go back and calculate daily VaR for the entire quarter by commodity group aggregated in this new manner - especially within a week.  So it appears we'll need to "swag" average daily VaR - by reviewing the cross commodity positions aggregated at 3/30, by considering cross-commodity activity you're aware of that took place throughout the quarter, and using our best estimate of the impact on VaR for this cross commodity activity.

Due to this adjustment in historical reporting practices, we feel a certain level of due diligence is required for us to  feel confident we're reporting to the BOD in accordance with the policy. And since we only have a few days, I thought a team approach to tackling the review would facilitate a prompt resolution of material issues, and then you and Chris' group can work out your processes and procedures on how to handle going forward as you see fit.  When you consider materiality, please involve your Market Risk contact - while a transaction/position/book may not be material to gas or power, it may be material to Global Products,  Weather, etc..

Would you please help us with the following:
?	Confirm your review of Chris' aggregation on the RAC DPR at 3/30 (Chris' staff can walk you through)
?	are all the cross-commodity positions you're aware of being reported correctly?
?	is there other cross-commodity activity not present at 3/30 and consequently not aggregated for the quarter's results, but actually present during the first quarter and material? If so, estimate impact on P/L and average daily VaR.
?	we're not expecting an exhaustive search or analysis - perhaps you can simply discuss this issue with the traders who handle this type of activity to get a feel, and if they point on specific material transactions, we can address those; you can determine best approach
?	are there certain books in RisktRAC that have cross-commodity positions imbedded/combined - either held currently or those that generated significant VaR or P/L during the quarter?  Going forward these will need to be reported separately to facilitate risk reporting, but in the next week what we need is an estimate of the impact on the corresponding commodities, or a conclusion that the impact is immaterial.
?	Once you've reviewed the summary of cross commodity activity per the RAC DPR and per your own knowledge, help us estimate the impact on the respective commodities' average daily VaR for the quarter - you can discuss with your market risk contact your recommendation on a reasonable "swag" approach.

After considering the information above, please provide your assessment on whether you are in fact able to capture and report all the cross-commodity activity, and if not, identify the issues involved and whether it is something that market risk needs to address, or if it will simply take more time to resolve the reporting details.

If you have other recommendations on how to get comfortable with the trading results for the quarter, please feel free to pursue those.  I do not mean to imply I know how to do your jobs, or that you're not doing them - I simply want to coordinate with you to ensure the #s we report to the BOD are the numbers you agree with, and that if they're not completely accurate given recent implementation, that we are able to articulate and estimate the potential misstatement, if any.  As you are the experts on your businesses' results, I simply wanted to make sure I closed the loop with what we in MRM understand regarding your reporting of the cross-commodity activity and trading results and the application of the policy.

On a separate note, we need you to identify P/L related to special transactions that flowed through the DPR, but do not really represent trading activity - examples in the past are SFAS 125 transactions and other unique gain/loss events - we're reporting 1Q 2001 and 1Q 2000, so whatever we can recall about last year will also be considered. We will be sending you a reconciliation from the DPR to the BOD package that we use to document any special adjustments, and will discuss this with you to come to an agreement on adjustments to the DPR reporting to derive true trading activity. These adjustments should be minimal, but we'd like your input to conclude.

Thank you for your cooperation,

Regards,
Cassandra Schultz
x30429
713 858 2618 cell
936 321 2185 home

(A)  For example, North American Electricity limits represent Enron's consolidated NA Electricity trading activity, without regard to which business unit or commodity group actually executes the trades or holds positions. So if Power has some gas positions for hedges or other reasons, these gas trades need to be removed from Power VaR and P/L and combined with Gas' VaR and P/L, etc..  Heating oil positions held outside Global Products should be aggregated with Global Products; Global Products' positions in gas and power should be aggregated with gas and power, with corresponding adjustment to Global Products' results.


Here are the latest Q and As.  FYI, we have toned down the message on the
amount of oil.  While we still do not have a final figure, it looks like it
could be around 20,000 barrels spilled.  We have never publicly released a
figure but have stated it might not be as high as the figure cited in news
stories, which was 25,000 barrels.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/07/2000 10:18 AM ---------------------------

Henry Means
03/06/2000 09:19 PM
To: Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dennis
Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: gamboaj@fleishman.com
Subject: Re: Transredes Q&As - March 6

Attached please find the latest Transredes Q&As (these have been properly
cleared by the legal and operations staff).


555403
broker has Q302

555404
broker has Q302

thanks


eSource presents Piranha Web training

Piranha Web offers an online connection to complete company analysis via
content that includes Disclosure, Worldscope, Datastream and I/B/E/S.  The
product is designed to allow users to get complete company fundamental
financials, earnings estimates, and market data.

Training Agenda Includes:
? General Introduction.
? Basic ticker query building

Attend our Piranha Clinic:

May 11 -    9:00 -10:00 AM  EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:34:24 -0500
From: "FRANK  WU" <FWU@LLGM.COM>
To: "DOUGLAS K. EYBERG" <Doug.Eyberg@LLGM.COM>, "ELIZABETH TRUJILLO"
<ETRUJILL@LLGM.COM>, "GEORGE T. LEE" <GTLEE@LLGM.COM>, "KAREN MADDREY"
<KMADDREY@LLGM.COM>, "RICHARD WAYNE JONES" <RWJONES@LLGM.COM>, "SOCORRO
HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM>, "TRUONG MANH NGUYEN" <TNGUYEN@LLGM.COM>
Subject: Florida Ballots
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Floridaballot_1.jpg"

 - Floridaballot_1.jpg


Elsie,

I put the 11/30 strip back in the deal.  The "884449 in bankruptcy" does refer to another deal that we created due to Aquila terminating transactions with us.  The reason you cannot see it is because you probably do not have access to the new portfolio.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Elsie
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	321581.1

Stacey,
	On deal 321581.1, there were adjustments made 12/10-12/11.   Appears to have deleted 11/30/01 strip.  In deal comments, what does "884449 in bankruptcy" mean?  I tried looking up this deal, but it did not exist.

Thanks,
Elsie
x36757


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 09:57 AM -----

	Leasa Lopez@EES
	01/09/2001 09:57 AM

		 To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Stephanie Truss/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: LLGM Meetings - Location Change

Today's meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in EB872.  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES on 01/09/2001 09:55
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Leasa Lopez                           01/08/2001 05:11 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-6899

To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Stephanie Truss/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: LLGM Meetings

Meeting Confirmation:

Tuesday, January 09, 2001
1:00 - 5:00 p.m.
EB9C1 (pending confirmation)
EB857 (fallback location)

Wednesday, January 10, 2001
8:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.
EB9C1 (pending confirmation)
EB857 (fallback location)

Attendees:
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae team
Vicki Sharp
Mike D. Smith
Bob Williams
Richard Sanders
Andy Edison
Bill Bradford

I will send out an e-mail on Tuesday by 10:30 a.m. confirming the location
for these meetings.  If you have any questions, please call me.
Thank you,
Leasa Lopez
Asst. to Vicki Sharp
x36899


The attached preliminary comments were finalized and filed with the
Commission this afternoon, in order to provide FERC staffers a concise,
effective statement of our position while they drafted the Judge's
recommendation.  I was able to schedule a meeting with Judge Wagner, at which
Dan Watkiss and I stepped the Judge through the comments and hit the
following high points:

1.  The methodology of the June 19 order does not work and is totally
inappropriate for marketers.  If price mitigation is inevitable, the Judge
should formulate or make allowances for a workable methodology.

2.  The Judge should recommend that the end result of any Commission order
must be a just and reasonable finding for all periods, both prior to and
after October 2.

3.  All buyers, including Enron, should be entitled to refunds; not just the
State of California and its IOU's.  Enron is a net purchaser in these markets.

4.  Only the state administered spot markets should be subject to the
methodology, not bilateral contracts, OOM sales or sales to the DWR.

The details of these points appear in the attached document.  The Judge was
receptive to most points.  He understood the problems that the June 19
methodology presents for marketers and was agreeable to the notion that this
should be addressed, perhaps in the context of the hearings that will form
part of his recommendation.  He agreed that the actual buyers should receive
refunds, and it was his understanding that only spot transactions should be
subject to the refund methodology.  Although he agreed that the refund
methodology, once implemented, should yield just and reasonable rates, he
felt that this was outside the scope of his recommendation and that the
matter was up to the Commission.  The Judge spoke generally and no promises
were made as to the content of his recommendations, but hopefully this
insight will shed some light as to the outcome.  I urged the Judge to
recommend placing conditions to refunds, as the Commission did in its June 19
order with its RTO filing requirement.  The judge was noncommittal on this,
although he did indicate that he felt refunds should be subject to offset.

Next steps include filing our detailed comments by Thursday.  The Judge told
us he would certify his recommendation to the Commission on Friday, and that
the comments would accompany the recommendation.  Thereafter, it is likely
that the Commission would defer to the Judge's recommendation to hold a fast
track evidentiary hearing of 60 days duration, to determine "unresolved
issues of material fact".  The scope of the hearing has not been determined,
but  will probably include cost issues and might serve as a vehicle for
marketers to recommend an alternative methodology.


----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 09:01 AM -----

	"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <ENRONPR@bloomberg.net>
	01/23/2001 08:58 AM

		 To: sharonda.stephens@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (DJN ) WSJ(1/23):UPDATE:Enron Mulls Offer To Supply Power In

         enron story

WSJ(1/23):UPDATE:Enron Mulls Offer To Supply Power In Calif.
1/23/1 0:26 (New York)

  By Rebecca Smith
  Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
  Enron Corp., a major energy-trading concern, is considering making an offer
to supply California's beleaguered utilities with at least some of the power
they need, at fixed prices.
  Meanwhile, Houston-based Enron reported that its earnings, excluding
nonrecurring items, jumped 34% in the fourth quarter, helped by big boosts in
natural-gas and electricity-trading volumes.
  Enron already supplies power, at a price of $55 a megawatt hour, to United
Illuminating Co., a utility unit of UIL Holdings Corp. in New Haven, Conn.,
"and we would be the natural person to do something similar in California,"
though the price likely would be higher, said Jeffrey Skilling, Enron's
president and chief executive-elect.
  Mr. Skilling said California officials have much work to do on the state's
energy infrastructure, if they want to get prices down to a tolerable level,
following in effect a meltdown of the state's electricity market in the past
month. State officials must get many more power plants constructed and new
transmission lines built, both in a fraction of the time it now takes, he
said.
With assurances of more electricity and fewer transmission bottlenecks in the
near future, prices would drop, he said.
  Aggressive action by the state "would affect prices in a significant way,"
Mr. Skilling said. "Otherwise there's a big premium that will continue to be
built into the prices."
  Yesterday Enron reported fourth-quarter net income fell 77% to $60 million,
or five cents per diluted share, from $259 million, or 31 cents a share, a
year
earlier. The sharply lower net reflected the impact of a $326 million charge
related to Enron's investments in faltering Azurix Corp., a global water
business that was spun off into a separate company two years ago.
  Excluding the impact of Azurix, Enron earnings jumped 34% to $347 million
from $259 million a year earlier on revenue that surged to $40.7 billion from
$10.9 billion. It's not clear how much money Enron made in California, where
the company has only a tiny generation presence but is a major trader.
  Profit for Enron's commodity sales business jumped 256% for the quarter to
$538 million from $151 million a year earlier, lifted by natural-gas and
electricity trading. For the year, the volume of natural gas traded by Enron
jumped 77% to 24.7 trillion British thermal unit-equivalents per day, and
electricity volumes grew, year over year, by 52% to 579 million megawatt hours
in North America. Volumes expanded in Europe, from a much smaller base, by
131%
to 3.6 trillion BTU-equivalents per day for gas and by 372% for electricity to
55 million megawatt hours.
  The company also logged strong gains in its retail energy-services division
that signs long-term power supply contracts with big businesses. Its pretax
earnings jumped to $33 million from $7 million a year earlier. Mr. Skilling
said, "The phone has been ringing off the hook in California" because of price
volatility and threats to stable supplies in recent weeks.
  EnronOnline, the company's Web-based commodities-trading platform, continued
to surpass expectations. The venture ended the year having completed
transactions with a gross value of $336 billion and now trades about 1,200
wholesale-commodity contracts for dozens of products, including energy, pulp
and paper, metals and telecommunications bandwidth or capacity on fiber-optic
networks.
  Its broadband-trading venture, which the company pioneered, executed 2,400
contracts for DS-3-equivalent months of capacity in the fourth quarter,
compared with 1,400 in the previous period.
  ---
  Journal Link: See a video report of Enron President and CEO-elect Jeffrey
Skilling discussing his company's earnings and California's energy crisis, in
the online Journal at WSJ.com.
  (END) DOW JONES NEWS  01-23-01
  12:26 AM- - 12 26 AM EST 01-23-01


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		7/18/2001
Task Start Date:	7/17/2001

713-775-4255 cell


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for September 2000:

34,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for September 2000:

9,000 mmbtu per day


Start Date: 3/16/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031605.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 07/07/99 08:07 AM
---------------------------

Tito Giron@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/23/99 05:39 PM
To: John H Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Hugo Barillas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Figueroa/GCO/Enron@Enron@ECT, Otto
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sergio
Gil/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Oehrle/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carlos
F Ubieto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: nicaragua

John,

Our situation in Nicaragua is that we are on hold pending authorization from
the government to start commissioning.  This is currently a delicate subject
and I do not want to receive fuel until we have started commissioning.

We have approx 15 days of fuel onboard to support commissioning, so I can
afford to postpone fuel delivery about two weeks after we start commissioning.

Therefore, what I am requesting is that EFI/Glencore allow me to provide a 10
day notice for the first fuel delivery to Nicaragua.  Physically we are ready
in that all the tanks, pipes hoses, etc... are in place.  This is a
commercial issue right now.

Please advise if a 10 day notice will be acceptable to EFI/Glencore.

Regards,

Tito

John H Harrison@ECT
06/23/99 12:28 PM
To: Hugo Barillas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Figueroa/GCO/Enron@Enron, Otto Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sergio Gil/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tito
Giron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Oehrle/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carlos
F Ubieto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: nicaragua

per telecon with glencore this day no vessel will be committed to without
notifying enron first.  glencore   still looking for vessel for delivery
window
of 30 jun-04 jul(per telecon with tito previously).
please keep my advised of any changes in requested delivery window.
thanks,


FYI. As if we weren't having enough fun with electricity....
Note last paragraph of press release calling on government to "get out of the
way" and "let the private sector solve the problems in the gas market."

Jeff

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   CONTACT: James Fisfis
March 5, 2001        (916) 319-2071

GOP MOVES NATURAL GAS TO FRONT BURNER
Assembly Republicans join together once again to request Davis to call
special session.

(SACRAMENTO) ) Assembly Republicans united Monday in asking Governor Gray
Davis to call a special session of the California legislature to deal with
skyrocketing natural gas prices.

&Families and businesses are reeling every month from extraordinary gas
prices.  Pardon the expression, but the natural gas crisis no longer belongs
on California,s back burner,8 said Assembly Republican leader Bill Campbell
(R ) Villa Park).

Assembly Republicans unanimously signed a letter to Governor Gray Davis
asking for him to convene a special session of the legislature to deal with
California,s skyrocketing natural gas bills.  Republicans delivered the
letter to Davis this morning.

&A special session is both a symbolic and a practical necessity.  It tells
Californians that we care about their skyrocketing gas bills.  It tells
businesses everywhere that California is going to provide for its future
energy needs,8 said Campbell.  &Practically speaking, a special session also
allow us to pass legislation which can take effect immediately.8

Republicans believe the electricity and natural gas crises are inextricably
linked.

&California,s natural gas crisis is completely intertwined with its
electricity crisis,8 said Campbell.  &Any plan to deal with our electricity
crisis must have a natural gas component or Californians are going to pay
unacceptably high prices for both.8

Assembly Republicans believe the natural gas crisis has many fronts, all of
which could be addressed comprehensively by a special session.

&Natural gas issues include pipeline capacity, storage, exploration,
alternative fuels and conservation,8 said Campbell.  &A special session lets
us put together a comprehensive solution.8

&The private sector has the expertise and the capital to deal with these
issues if government would just get out of the way.  Republicans believe that
a legislative solution to the natural gas crisis should leave the resources
and primary decision-making to the private sector,8 said Campbell.

# # #
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 05:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	03/05/2001 05:14 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

in case you didn't see this

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 03:12 PM -----

	"Costigan, Richard" <Richard.Costigan@asm.ca.gov>
	03/05/2001 02:51 PM

		 To:
		 cc:
		 Subject: Today's Assembly GOP press conference - materials

 <<press release.doc>>  <<Natgastps - rep legislation.doc>>  <<Republican
Energy Address.doc>>  <<QA.doc>>  <<DOE powerpoint.ppt>>

Attached are documents that were part of today's Assembly GOP press
conference on the pending natural gas crisis.  If you have any questions,
please call me.

Thanks,

RSC

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
(916) 319-2071

 - press release.doc
 - Natgastps - rep legislation.doc
 - Republican Energy Address.doc
 - QA.doc
 - DOE powerpoint.ppt


----- Original Message -----
From: Dana Davis <mailto:ddavissprint20@earthlink.net>
To: wendykoeb@springisd.org <mailto:wendykoeb@springisd.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:56 AM
Subject: Candis' Rough Draft "Drug Free"

Candis has informed me that you are requiring a note from me in regards to me having her English paper yesterday.  This is true.  I forgot to give it back to her after making a copy for our files.  Thank you.

Mrs. Davis
(713) 853-7520


I am forwarding for your attention the resume of Peter Percell
who has an extensive experience in modeling physical flows
of natural gas in pipeline systems. Peter is looking currently for a job.

I met him last week at the meeting of the Science and Industry Advance with
Mathematics
society at the University of Houston.

The application of recent developments in optimization theory
and numerical methods can help Enron to improve further
efficiency of our pipeline system and reduce the consumption of compressor
fuel.

Please, let me know if you interested in introducing Peter to executives
in your organization. I shall be glad to make arrangements for an interview.

Vince Kaminski

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
02:17 PM ---------------------------

Peter Percell <percell@swbell.net> on 04/30/2001 11:16:58 AM
To: Vincent Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Follow-up on SIAM Workshop

I enjoyed your presentation, and meeting you briefly afterwards, at the
SIAM Workshop last Friday.

I have extensive experience as a technical leader in the design and
development of modeling and simulation software products, mostly
for the oil and gas pipeline industry.

I am looking for a position that can utilize my software development and
mathematical skills.  Getting out of the narrow confines of the pipeline
simulation industry would be a plus.

Please consider whether I might fit in your group.  Your answer to a
question indicated that I have several of the skills you look for.

Also, please let me know, by email, the names and contact information of
other managers within Enron who might benefit from having someone with
my qualifications in their group.

Attached are my resume and an addendum covering academic & consulting
experience.  Publications are available on request.

I will call you in a couple of days to follow up on this email.

Thank you for your time.

Peter Percell                        10030 Doliver Drive
percell@swbell.net               Houston, TX 77042-2016
(713) 532-3836 voice & fax
 - Percell, Peter Resume Only.doc
 - Percell, Peter A&C Exp.doc


Mark Fischer
deal 461972
error:  Prebon does not recognize this deal.


Steve,

 I contacted Cheryl Dawson the environmental manager at Enron Methanol
regarding the Corporate Watch article.  As you can see below in Cheryl's
response the emissions reported to EPA under the Toxic Release Inventory
(TRI) rules  have decreased significantly since the 1997 report developed by
Environmental Defense.  Additionally, Cheryl related to me that Enron
Methanol was a participant in Clean Texas 200, an effort to reduce the amount
of waste being generated annually by 50% by the year 2000.  Enron Methanol
did achieve this goal, and has gone from a large quantity waste generator to
a conditionally exempt small quantity generator.  This is due to the
beneficial use by the Enron  MTBE plant of the mixed alcohol by -product from
the Methanol plant.  In 1998 , MTBE plant began using the mixed alcohols in
their process stream.  That is certainly a success story and is reflected in
the reduced n-butyl alcohol TRI entry seen in Cheryl's note below.

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron on 08/01/2000
01:49 PM ---------------------------

Cheryl Dawson
08/01/2000 01:32 PM
To: Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Corporate Watch article

Yes, I have seen the Defense Fund's propaganda.  Here is the breakdown:
(all shown in pounds)      1997       1998             1999

methanol (air releases)     173352   179519                89616
methanol (disposal off-site)     87351      57191     2742

ammonia (air releases)        2720        2720    2720
ammonia (treated off-site)       5168                       4788    4788

formaldehyde (air releases only)     98300      81380   69984

n-butyl alcohol (off-site disposal only)  155266           945          42

The numbers the Scorecard used in the "1997 TRI Pollution Release Sorted by
Health Effect" section are various combinations of methanol + formaldehyde +
ammonia.  Unfortunately they've not said anything that isn't true.  It is all
in presentation and effective combination.  We have done much better this
year in comparison but for the methanol and formaldehyde the release amounts
are reduced due in part to better calculation methods and a different AP-42
for formaldehyde.  And, by the way, the formaldehyde is strictly from the
combustion of natural gas in the engines.  We will, of course, have to
address the engines for NOx but I don't know that the retrofit will affect
the formaldehyde.  Anyway, hope this helps.  We are getting better and
certainly are aware and doing what we can.


Robert, attached is the PAA form you can fill out and send to me to submit.  Thanks. Lynn

                        -----Original Message-----
From: Dietz, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:06 PM
To: Benningfield, Robert
Subject: RE: Check it out Awards

Unfortunately, the Check it Out Awards program has not been renewed.  If you have someone on your team you wish to reward for a significant accomplishment, please check with Lynn to discuss whether she should submit a Personal Achievement Award request.

Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Benningfield, Robert
Sent: Tue 10/16/2001 4:55 PM
To: Dietz, Rick
Cc: Benningfield, Robert
Subject: Check it out Awards

Rick,

The South team would like to nominate several people in ETS for the Check it out Awards.

We have three questions:

        1. What is the procedure for completing an award
        2.  Is their an amount limit per team?
        3.  Is their an amount limit per individual?

Thanks

Robert


Please let me know if you have any other questions relating to an investment in the above referenced entity.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com


We must be able at all times to fulfill our firm obligations through Station 6.  We do not have the option of reducing our certificated capacity without filing an abandonment at the FERC in which we would have to demonstrate that the abandonment would not impair our abilities to meet our firm obligations.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hughes, Matt
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Alters, Dennis; Choquette, Gary
Cc:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	RE: Compressor Station # 6

Talked to Buzz about the situation... It seems we "might" not have the option to leave the other 2 units alone due to Firm obligations.  Operationally we could probably handle using just one compressor.  However, we need 3 units fulfil our FT committments.

Teb,
Per our phone message, could you check on the tariff requirements for this issue.  In other words, do we have the option of shutting down 2 compressors @ CS6?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alters, Dennis
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Choquette, Gary
Cc:	Hughes, Matt
Subject:	Compressor Station # 6

Gary, Matt will be your contact for the CS#6 run time/unit enhancement issues we discussed. He is gathering the info and will get
in touch with you directly.  Thanks Dennis


This will confirm my conference with Scott and Tanya, who instructed me to
proceed forward with arbitration against Triad.

Attached for your review is the proposed arbitration demand in the
above-referenced action.  I may change the description of ENA as an "energy
marketer" and just leave it blank, given how difficult it is to describe
everything ENA does.  I may do the same thing with the description of Triad.

Please let me know if you have any comments and whether you approve my filing
it.  Once I have your authority, I will file it as soon as I have received
the $8,500 filing fee check, which I am requesting from accounting.

Many thanks.

Britt


I know that it is a finesse but I would rather not have a specific date
(although we would prefer a specific date relative to no clarity on this
matter):

If I were writing it it would something like:
In no case shall the rate freeze, as defined by AB1890, end before the CPUC
has determined replacement rates.  And in no case shall such determination of
replacement rates,  beyond the end of AB 1890 term (Mar 2002).

Such wording means supports our claim of negative ctc up to new setting of
rates.  It also allows us to argue with customers that we switched them for
their own good.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/29/2001 12:37 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conversations with Customers on Date Certain for End of Rate Freeze
in Legislation

I've left messages describing our idea with TURN and the large
cogenerators/marketers/producers, and I've spoken with the Farm Bureau and
the California Manufacturers Association.  The Bureau and CMA agree with our
idea and I've asked them to "pass the word along" to other customer groups
and to try to ensure that its an integral part of the negotiations.  I'll be
calling other customer groups and will report back on those conversations.

Best,
Jeff


I'm happy to introduce Molly Magee as the newest addition to the EOPS
Recruiting Team.      Toni and Molly have divided their recruiting duties
along separate job functions.     Please review the information below and
direct your staffing requests to either Toni or Molly depending on your job
needs.

Toni Graham - Accounting, Risk and Confirmation/Settlements positions (or
openings requiring a similar skill set of this candidate pool)

Molly Magee - Logistics, Global Data Management, Research, Legal, Competitive
Analysis, Contract Administration and Other positions (or openings requiring
a similar skill set of this candidate pool)

Thanks for your assistance,
hgm


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 06:26
AM ---------------------------

Michael Jacobson@ENRON
02/27/2001 04:48 PM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ASC

Kayne,

If you could pass along to the Hourly group that the correct CP for Ameren
transmission is Ameren Service Company - ASC, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,
Michael
x35098


Cindy,

I got a copy of the book and another one is on the way from our officer in
India.
I can lend you the book and you can makes copies of the most important
chapters.
I don't think we should be buying too many copies and increasing the sales of
the book.

In general, I think that we should counter the presentations made by Mr.
Mehta. The person in charge of
our Dhabol operation is a Stanford graduate and maybe he could obtain an
invitation
to speak at the same forum  and present the facts as they are. He should be
here for the management
conference.

Vince

From: Cindy Derecskey@ENRON on 10/11/2000 01:30 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Power Play Book

Good afternoon Vince,

Christie Patrick mentioned to me the conference that your wife recently
attended at Stanford.  At this coference Abahy Mehta discussed his/her
recently published book 'Power Play' - that certainly does NOT flatter
Enron.  I have conducted a search on Amazon.com, Britannica.com and Dow Jones
and I am coming up empty handed.  Would you be kind enough to briefly trouble
your wife to provide any other information she may remember, so I can narrow
my search.

I greatly appreciate it.

Regards,

Cindy


Hi Karen,

Sorry I haven't sent the notice.  Brain cramp or something.

When are you here next week?

Kay

Karen E Jones@ECT
02/22/2001 12:22 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TurboPark PSA

Dale's probably a likely suspect.  Any luck finding your form of notice to
exercise option to take down the equipment??  Please share if it's handy!
Thanks.

I'll be in Houston next week;  I'll find you to say hi.

KJ

Kay Mann@ENRON
02/22/2001 09:54 AM
To: Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: TurboPark PSA

Hi there,

Does anyone have a Finance/Accounting blessed professional services agreement?

Thanks,

Kay


Timing is everything.  Today I spoke to DB about the ETA amendment.  Unfortunately, many of their workers remain quite shaken by the Sept. events as their office is farily close to ground zero.

We have one issue outstanding.  I have provided language to their counsel that I believe will satisfy their concerns.  I am not waiting for an approval of that language.  Presuming it comes this week, we should be done.

Please let me know if any of you should have any further questions.

Thanks.

mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:14 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie
Cc:	Greenberg, Mark
Subject:	RE: ? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank

We are waiting for Mark Greenberg to finalize the negotiations on the amendment to the online ETA for DB.  We would like to shut down BT from all financial trading.  However, what we found was that DB will not execute the online ETA without some revisions.  Mark is negotiating an amendment to the ETA with DB.  Meanwhile, BT had already been trading online.  Since that cat was already out of the bag so to speak, DB didn't want to shut them down from trading without having another avenue to trade, so we are continuing to trade as BT.  We do not want to do this FOREVER, HOWEVER, so we do need to get BT SHUT DOWN.

HOW GOES IT MARK????
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:04 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan; Jones, Tana; Heard, Marie
Subject:	? re: Bankers Trust/ Deutsche Bank

Howdy.  Can one of you guys remind me where we stand with this sort-of merged counterparty?
Last I recall while DB had bought BT, BT was still allowed to transact in its name - because we
hadn't yet renegotiated an ISDA for the combined entity.  Is that still where we stand?

HELP!!!!

:)

Diane


Chris- I think John replied to this.  In addition, Enron can use the TCO
storage in any manner you choose.
Scott

Chris_Germany@enron.com on 12/23/99 08:22:09 AM
Please respond to Chris_Germany@enron.com

To: Scott Goodell/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: John Hodge [NOTES.jwhodge]@LMSOV, Dan_Junek@enron.com
Subject: Storage Questions

I have 2 storage questions for now.

1.  Cove Point LNG - it's my understanding that this is a LNG peaking
facility.
The current balance is 1,500,000 dth.  Did you have a withdrawal schedule or
were you going to use this as peaking gas?

2.  TCO contract 63304 - has capacity of 7 BCF, and I think your current
storage
balance is about 5 BCF.  What is your withdrawal schedule for Jan??

thanks


Please be advised that effective Monday, September  10, 2001, the retention policy for all voice mails will be 30 days.


FYI and follow-up.
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001
09:36 AM ---------------------------

Adrian Woolcock@EES
05/09/2001 09:25 AM
To: mike.mcconnell@enron.com
cc: cathy.phillips@enron.com
Subject: RE: Enron Global Markets

Mike,
 It was nice talking to you at the EGM info session on Monday, the 7th at the
Hyatt.  As we discussed, I am interested in opportunities within your group,
specifically the LNG arena.  I interviewed and discussed this issue with Greg
Curran and Doug J Arnell on Tuesday the 8th.  I strongly believe in the
mutual benefits derived both from my learning and ability to contribute to
your efforts.
 I am currently in my second rotation working for Dan Leff and Dick Leibert
in EES.  I have been at Enron since 1996.  In my former role, I served as the
controller for GPG Operations Support (CO 423).  There I managed 25 cost
centers which perform O&M, Procurement, Document Mgmt, and Regulatory
Services for GPG and other assets across the globe.  My role was the sole
source for general administration, budgeting, planning, and financial
reporting.  This included management of $19.5M on a gross basis and
overseeing the day-to-day operation of the Mustang timesheet system.  I also
represented my organization as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) for the July
2000 implementation of SAP within GPG.
 In my first rotation in Enron Energy Services I performed analysis,
forecasting, and pricing of power and gas risk management instruments.
Currently I am working on projects ranging from Customer Satisfaction, system
development and implementation, budgeting/space management, California Crisis
Taskforce to new business ventures and cost savings initiatives.  Although an
American citizen by birth, I have also spent 14 years living in the
Caribbean.  I am a team player and a very motivated, high energy individual.
My experience, the responsibilities bestowed, along my willingness to give
110% will provide a valuable asset to a group.  I would like to generate a
dialogue with you regarding the issue.  If there are any questions or
requests of me, please feel free to let me know.  Thank You
 Adrian Woolcock

---------------------- Forwarded by Adrian Woolcock/HOU/EES on 04/02/2001
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Fernando Herrera@ECT
03/27/2001 03:06 PM
To: Adrian Woolcock/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Letter to Eric
Hope I explained it correctly. He is moving to Houston in 1-2 weeks, so he
must be very busy. You should call him when he gets there, I would say.

Fernando Herrera
03/27/2001 02:58 PM
To: Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hi there + LNG group candidate
Hi Eric,

I started last Monday and this is VERY cool. It is also going to be quite a
challenge, as the deals are much more complex than what I had the chance to
see in Europe. Seems that I am going to learn a lot!! so far, expectations
are met.

 I am also writing you because I have been contacted by an associate who is
very interested in joining the LNG group. He has been working for Enron since
1996 and has been involved with gas transportation and EES. He heard about
the Bahama project and thought that he could add tons of value there, as he
was raised in Jamaica. He also wants to be involved with a group that allows
him to have international exposure and, ultimately, the possibility of
working abroad. I am attaching his resume, in case you are looking for people
for your group.

Have a nice trip back home.
Fernando


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/17/2000 02:30 PM ---------------------------

	enron india

	From:  Mrudula Gadade                           02/17/2000 04:13 AM

To: Kenneth Bean/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Belew/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rudy
Benitez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John W
Cates/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lohit
Datta-Barua/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Binky
Davidson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tushar
Dhruv/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranabir
Dutt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tony
Galt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill
Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Zdenek
Gerych/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roy
Gibson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren
Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David B
Howe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karima
Husain/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Iyer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Annat
Jain/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debra S
Johnson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kelly
Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Meiko
Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Luis
Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Miller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Prashant
Mitta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ruth A
Noble/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Hans
Owens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Banu
Ozcan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Douglas S
Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Phil
Patman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana L
Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debbie
Perrotta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frances
Reese/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Crystal
Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joana
Ryan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol
Short/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddie H
Sikes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Inderpal
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen
Stenhouse/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Johan
Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Arvind Bhatnagar@ECT, Clay
Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth
Lambert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandy
Hoelscher/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracy
Solis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Crystal
Reyna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EIPL Employees All (Mumbai),
Martha Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EIPL Employees All
(Delhi), METGAS Executives, METGAS Staff, Parinita
Hate/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Message from Sanjay Bhatnagar and Wade Cline.

Please see attached.

Regards,
Mrudula.


Mr. Lay, as an employee and a stock holder of  Enron, I'm very concerned with what's going on within our company.  I have  always been very positive about Enron and very supportive of the management,  however I truly believe that when Mr. Skillings was made CEO of the company the  investment community lost interest in our company.

I know you can't tell me where the stock will be in  12 to 18 months but it would be some re-assurance to hear from you.


Could you find the deal ticket for Trco k#2.7055?

May
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Beverly Beaty on 01/28/2000 01:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Do you see 2.7055 in Unify?

Nope.........


517814 - added .0075 fee per Chris Mallory

535228 - I'm waiting for Tom's desk to settle down a bit - they're in the
middle of trading.

Any idea why APB's just checking these deals out now? They're from the
beginning of February. Just wondering.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/26/2001 01:08 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb fees

kate can you check on these 2 deals

517814 broker has fee of .0075

535228 broker has fee of .0075

thanks


Deal #'s: Q08784 legs 1&2; Q08787 legs1&2

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin X5-8274


this answers when and where
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/02/2000
02:32 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           10/02/2000 02:31 PM

To: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Meeting - - Trading Policy

Sorry, we plan to meet on Weds. 10/4 at 10:00 am if thats ok with everyone.

Dan

	From:  Dan Fancler                           10/02/2000 02:30 PM

To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Maria Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Meeting - - Trading Policy

Revised Trading Policy.  We would like to get together in room 4263 to review
your comments and make changes as necessary.

Thanks, Dan


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		2
Task Due On:		12/17/2000
Task Start Date:	12/17/2000


Hey there.

I don't think I've been fishing since July.  Geez, it is half way through
September.

I'm in Chicago today (NYC yesterday).  A whirl wind tour.

I hear the Aquarium closed - killed by bike lanes.  Two weeks later the owner
died.  We need to find a "new" dive.

Kay

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/12/2000 04:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Sanity check

Yeh-huh. I sent an e-mail. I will dredge up and resend. Been fishing lately?

To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Sanity check

I'm either losing my mind or my email.  Did you send me an email re GE?  I
thought I saw one, but now I can't find it. Is that a trick, and if so, how
do I do it?

Could you resend it, please?

Thanks,

Kay


<<Nov24.doc>>  <<Nov24.txt>>
Sasha Jacob
GPC Canada
sjacob@gpc.ca
Ph:  (416) 598-0055
Fx:  (416) 598-3811
www.gpcinternational.com

 - Nov24.doc
 - Nov24.txt


John,
I'm hearing we are thinking about going to 24 hour trading. You are aware that the "machine" in crude is not profitable.  It is my understanding that crude has lost approx.$20MM on this algorithm year-to-date.   (FYI, at 11:00am it was down 132K for today's action)

For whatever it is worth, I'm a seller of this idea.  (Unless of course, someone tells me that something has changed. And if it is fixable, why haven't the crude boys fixed it?)

Frank


I know the feeling


For your information. Please call me with any comments.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 01:35
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman                           06/20/2000 01:17 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Chicago Legal Doc Status

Per my voicemail, attached is a list of business items that need to get put
in place in order for Midwest Energy Hub LLC to be fully operational.  There
are probably others that I have missed and would welcome any additions you
may have.  One thing I did not include was any internal Enron approvals,
(DASH, Legal risk memo) that may be necessary.

Call me when you have a chance to talk through the list.

Thanks,

Gregg


Meg - Unfortunately, I am scheduled to be out on Monday, but I will send someone from my group.  Do you have an agenda?  Let me know if you need anything in advance.  You can also call me at home this weekend 281-360-7601, or leave me voicemail at work.  Thanks.  MEK

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheryl.D.Lara@dynegy.com
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 3:44 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Koenig, Mark; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); John.Sousa@dynegy.com; Meg.Nollen@dynegy.com; Keith.Fullenweider@dynegy.com; dafi@dynegy.com; Arthur.J.Shannon@dynegy.com
Cc: McVicker, Maureen; Hiltabrand, Leslie; Kim.Budzik@dynegy.com; Sandra.K.Monclova@dynegy.com; Sandra.S.Martinez@dynegy.com
Subject: Revised Meeting Notice - Time Change 2-3:00 P.M.

**  REVISED MEETING NOTICE  **
Please be advised that there will be a meeting held on Monday, November 19,
2001 from 2:00-3:00 p.m. at the Dynegy offices on the 67th floor in the
Boardroom.  The topic of discussion will be "Near & Long-Term Financial
Commitments".  The meeting participants are as follows:
                            Mark Palmer - Enron
                            Mark Koenig - Enron
                            Steve Kean - Enron
                        Keith Fullenweider - Dynegy
                            Meg Nollen - Dynegy
                          Debbie Fiorito - Dynegy
                           Art Shannon - Dynegy
                            John Sousa - Dynegy

If you will be unable to attend this meeting, please contact Sheryl Lara at
713-767-6273.  Many thanks!

Sheryl D. Lara
Assistant to Meg Nollen
Dynegy, Inc. - Investor Relations
1000 Louisiana, Suite 6700
Houston, Texas  77002
Ph: 713-767-6273
Fax: 713-767-8288


I have created two new fuel reports that make it easier to view the Fuel Retained and the Fuel Used numbers.

I have attached the Retained Fuel matrix and the Fuel Used matrix reports for your viewing pleasure.

Ken Powers
(402) 398-7065


I am forwarding Harlan's schedule of termination dates for TXU.  Please calculate our MTM values on those dates as soon as you can, and forward them to me.  Thank you.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Harlan
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:37 PM
To:	Tricoli, Carl; Reeves, Leslie; Murphy, Melissa
Subject:	TXU Contract Termination Dates

Give me a call if you have any questions.  I guess the next step is to clean up a few items on the attached spread sheet and then assign a value to each contract.  We need to come up with a plan for factoring in LDs with the MTM exposure.


Sorry, but this is funny . . .
http://auburn.nu/board/display.cgi?read=236745


Sure:

I think that would be a great opportunity to get more insights on modeling
forward curves.
I would like to participate on both courses if possible.

Many thanks for remembering my name.
Paulo Issler.

Vince J Kaminski
11/13/2000 08:15 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Lacima Energy and Weather Derivatives Courses by Clewlow and
Strickland

Paulo, Alex,

Any interest?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:22 AM ---------------------------

"Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk> on 11/12/2000 02:05:40 PM
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:@mailman.enron.com;>
cc:
Subject: Lacima Energy and Weather Derivatives Courses by Clewlow and
Strickland

Please find attached information?for our next two courses and  workshops:?
Energy Derivatives:? Pricing and Risk Management and
Weather Derivatives, which will be conducted in Houston and in London in  Feb
/ March 2001.? Instructors will be Dr Les Clewlow and Dr Chris  Strickland.
?
Because the course requires intense interaction, the courses will  be?limited
to a maximum of 15 people, so early registration is  encouraged.
?
If you require further information, or would like to register for either or
both?courses, please contact me via this email or our web site,?www.
lacimagroup.com
 - Energy.pdf
 - weather.pdf


Hello Team - the only thing I still need are the plots

Chris - do you have these?

Otherwise, everything is printed/done.

Kimberly Kupiecki
Director
A&R Partners
kkupiecki@arpartners.com
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801


The TDS IT group needs your approval to start work on some enhancements to the TDS Deal Ticker.

TDS currently is not valuing physical changed deals correctly.

                          Change deal valuation is based on current value vs the value from the previous night port calc.   However since CPR numbers can change
                          when the deal is revised, it does not have a exact previous valuation to compare to. Resulting in full deal value displaying as the change.
                          Bill has a concept to base Change Deal Value on the whole Sitara deal rather than the individual CPR tickets.

TDS does not value correctly deals priced to the desk at Mid

                          Current valuation does not take physical premium into effect.  Not a large value effect unless the physical premium is large,
                          such as IF-NGPL/Harper, that has a premium of $.22.
                          The CPR reader can be changed to include the Mid Market Flag that CPR has.  Valuation can then include premium into the calc.


Ross Malme -- 7587
Anthony D -- 6235


Richard:

No response yet.

Scott

From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/09/2001 04:10 PM
To:	Scott Franck/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: A'lones transaction

Scott,

Any response from Denise?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Franck, Scott
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	dfurey@enron.com
Cc:	rring@enron.com
Subject:	A'lones transaction

Denise:

Richard Ring suggested that you were the appropriate person to contact regarding filling in some blanks on the Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement between EES and A'lones.  I have attached hereto a copy of the Agreement.  The Cover Sheet (see p. 2-3 of the attachment) has a series of elections and blanks for amounts, guarantor credit ratings, etc.  I would appreciate your assistance in getting these items completed.  If you have questions regarding A'lones, background of the transaction, and party expectations, please give Richard Ring a call.  Thanks for your help.

Scott L. Franck

 << File: A'lones - EEI Form 2000.doc >>


Joe - could you or someone in the office get in touch with Michelle?  Thanks
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/22/2000 10:43 AM -----

	Michelle Cash@ECT
	09/22/2000 10:15 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Urgent!!! FLSA legislation is on the fast track

Steve,

As mentioned in my voice mail, attached is the email from SHRM about the
proposed amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act.  I believe that this
legislation would be helpful to Enron.  Let me know if I can do anything to
help.

Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Drew C Lynch
09/21/2000 10:24 AM
To: Brian Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Urgent!!! FLSA legislation is on the fast track

Brian / Michelle,

I would take this as good news!!

DCL

---------------------- Forwarded by Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT on 21/09/2000 16:26
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  hhrma@hhrma.org                           21/09/2000 14:30

To: drew.c.lynch@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Urgent!!! FLSA legislation is on the fast track

HHRMA members Lori Thomas and Lane Transou shared findings from the
Legislative Action Committee's FLSA-bonus survey (presented at September's
meeting) last Friday in Washington, D.C. with representatives of several
influential members of Congress. Pending legislation (sponsored in part by
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison) would permit non-exempt employees to participate
in bonus programs without employers having to recalculate overtime rates.

Congress is ready to act. President Clinton may be willing to sign. We need
your help.

Please consider calling/e-mailing members of both houses, especially Phil
Gramm, Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL), and Houston area Congresspersons Ken
Bentsen, Bill Archer, Sheila Jackson Lee, Nick Lampson, Tom DeLay, Kevin
Brady, and Gene Green.

Contact information is at http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/. SHRM has sample
E-Mail wording at http://cw2k.capweb.net/shrm/letterstate.cfm under "Bonus
Legislation-House Version" and "Bonus Legislation-Senate Version." If
possible, please copy President Clinton on your communications as well.


thsx for the note Becky.

regards
delainey


Thanks for the schedule.  If the game with Seattle is still available on
Thursday, April 5, I would love to use the seats.

Thanks for your help!!!