Terry was acting with full coordination from Jose.  The problem was this:
Daly insisted someone speak on behalf of the group to the press (and
designated Terry to be the one); Terry did not have the updated information
that we were about to meet with the government officials and deliver a
slightly different message (i.e. that we needed to know if the government
planned to really open Petrobras or not -- the implication being that we
would work within either decision but we needed to know one way or the
other); Terry was simply not in possession of this information and no one had
given it to him (probably because they had no reason to assume that Terry
would be thrust in front of the press); moreover, it's hard to see how Terry
could have taken such a position publicly anyway.  By my eyes Terry did the
best he could and we had an unavoidable communications bust.  I know the
Southern cone team is moving to make it right, but I see absolutely no reason
to come don on anyone about this.

Richard Shapiro
02/17/2000 09:47 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Trade Mission

What was the outcome?

Steven J Kean
02/17/2000 08:13 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Trade Mission

FYI.  I will call Terry and get in touch with Jim/Diomedes
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 02/17/2000 08:13
AM ---------------------------

Diomedes Christodoulou@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/17/2000 02:42 AM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean@EES, Kelly Kimberly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Trade Mission

Jim/Steve,

How can Terry go out with public statements without knowing a thing of the
dynamics of our negotiations with the Minister on the gas issue? This is
especially damaging given we are depending on the Minister to get approvals
for our two emergency power projects. Let's monitor this but my suggestion is
that Jim needs to call Carraro right away and give some explanation before he
decides to boycot our projects.
---------------------- Forwarded by Diomedes Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 02/17/2000 05:37 AM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
02/15/2000 05:18 PM
To: Denise M Macedo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Trade Mission

See below the messages I had asked Terry to convey in his meetings in the
region.  I did ask him to raise the issue of Petrobras through Secretary Daly
with the Brazilians officials as an impediment to the open markets.

It never occurred to me that he would be making Press statements. (or that he
would be quoted in this flavor).  This, coupled with the GM ABEGAS) article
will turn up the heat.

Given that Jim's messages are going to be delivered this week (Denise, Jim
will discuss the issue with Carraro. We intend to file a protest in ANP by
Friday due to lack of responsiveness in our request for a transportation
tariff).........

1)  I would not go to the press. Let it go..

2) If asked, repeat the vision  "regional integration, based on the
principles of open access, greater reliance on competition and customer
choice"

3) Monitor the response. Let me know if you are getting unfavorable reactions
(other than Petrobras).

4) Jim,  if you get a call ahead of your meeting,  we cannot discredit Terry
(The shadow of Petrobras is an unfortunate quote). Use this in your favor.
Press on with the message "Is Brazil ready to open the gas market to
competition". If so, let's get started.

Jose

---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/15/2000 01:45 PM ---------------------------

Jose Bestard
02/15/2000 01:45 PM
To: Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Trade Mission

Terry.

The Key message for the trip, in regards to energy, should be:

 "Achieve regional integration, based on the principles of open access,
greater reliance on competition and customer choice rather than regulated
monopolies"

The vision is that a customer in any of the countries will have choices
"several competing providers"; "different service options", and the providers
will have the flexibility and agility to assemble an attractive package by
combining transactions  with other suppliers and customers.  This approach
maximizes the utilization of the existing infrastructure (reduces idle or
redundant facilities) and gives customers the ability to more closely tailor
their energy purchases to the their needs.

There are barriers to achieve this vision. It is in the interest of the
governments to work in a common protocol to progress rapidly.

Development of infrastructure .- Still not well developed. Needs to attract
project financing. At this stage, the customers have few alternatives.
Government policy should be to allow access above and beyond what was
initially contracted to justify the financing. Terms of financing have to be
honored. Long term, competing facilities (pipelines, refineries, transmission
lines, power plants) will be fighting for customers.

Threat. Control of these facilities: Petrobras through the BBPL; YPF in
Argentina

Cross-border Licensing.- Very time consuming, bureaucratic delays to grant,
export, import, re-export permitting.  Present regime cannot accommodate  the
rapid transaction scenario which will be required to support real integration.

Cuiaba Power plant,- As of today we have not received all the permits. Latest
issue is the Bolivian-Argentina border dispute due to YPF denial to
accommodate a transaction of Bolivian gas into Argentina.

Operationally, the plant will receive daily instructions from Brasilia. The
gas supply from Argentina/Bolivia, including spot market transaction  has to
be nominated within 48 hours notice.  There are no mechanisms to change
quickly the approved volumes.

Commercial entities need to be given the opportunity to export/import to
aggregate the requirements of different suppliers various customers.

Taxation.- Transfer taxes (i.e. receipt taxes ,stamp taxes) for each step
down the chain needs to be eliminated for commercial entities, particularly
for export transactions.

These commercial entities buy pieces of the services on behalf of the
ultimate customer (act as their agent) and package the final offer. The
objective to  reduce the cost of the product, which would not be met by
adding a further taxable event. There should not be  more, nor any less taxes
because of the services of the middle company, except for the larger amount
of income taxes generated by increase commercial activity.

Money Transfers.-  Central Bank Controls to authorize the transfer of
currency needs to be made more agile. Currently these procedures are very
time consuming and cumbersome (Brazil -- I am not as familiar with the other
countries)

This is affecting us in Cuiaba. The Central Bank has not approved the gas
contract, specifically the Take-or-pay provision that has a one-year make up
period. They want a longer make-up period, but that was negotiated with YPF
as part of the larger agreement. YPF may agree but at a higher price. The
Central Bank does not want to send US$ out of the country, so they view TOP
as a devise of paying for a commodity never received. So they are meddling in
contract negotiations.

Below are other notes

Thanks

Jose

Terence H Thorn
02/09/2000 09:22 AM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard Shapiro@EES

Subject: Trade Mission

I have forwarded to you the final schedule of meetings for Daly's trade
mission.  I am very comfortable with issues for Argentina and think we need
to focus mainly on the stamp tax issue.  Secondly, I would raise the issue of
open access pipelines, especially allowing Bolivian gas to flow to
Argentina.  The question I have on this latter issue is whether this is a
matter of changing the law, changing policy or pressuring YPF to allow the
gas to flow on it's section of pipe which I understand is not under the
jurisdiction of Enargas. What can the government do?

JB.- I am not familiar with the genesis of this situation, how these
pipelines escaped the jurisdiction of the regulator.  If it is determined
that they are not part of the regulated pipeline network, in time a bypass
pipeline may be built. But an immediate solution needs to be developed.

In Brazil, I am not sure what to raise.  On Monday we have meetings with the
Minister of Development, Industry and Commerce and the Secretary of Energy
and Mines.  What do I need to have Daly raise with them in private?  Myself
in public? or the Minister of External Affairs?

JB.- For background, the Brazilians have rising concerns of the rising
dollarization of their economy, "desnacionaliza?ao". Their concern is not the
US$, it is control. It is that the Old-boys network in Brazil
Government/Industry, has been disturbed by the New-boys taking control of
high visibility sectors, Banking, telecommunications, energy.

Malan, Finance is criticized by the clique that wants the government to be
active in direct investment and support of big projects.
Complaints about BNDES (Brazilian development bank) lending to foreigners for
privatization (Recent AES incident)
Tourinho, Mines and Energy-- pushing a new privatization model -- sale of
stock at the market, not sale of control to a given company. This allows the
existing management to stay in place.
If it is the Secretary of Energy, Carraro, his big mission is to coordinate
the developement of emergengy thermal plants. Big Picture Governement Porgram
-- Petrobras provides that gas;  Eletrobras buys and remarkets the electric
energy;  BNDES provides the financing  --- All within the family.

Foreign companies will not play by the rules of the old network. Enron has
been actively complaining about the gas policy under Petrobras control.

The One Issue I would raise is the lack of competition in the gas sector.
Petrobras control of the BBPL and national gas. There cannot be true
competition in the energy sector because the marginal power plants, price
setters, gas power plants.

As a note, there was a commitment with the World Bank to sell the part of 51%
control of the Brazilian part of the BBPL pipeline. What Petrobras is doing
is locking-up the capacity long term, and building a second pipeline.

Of equal importance is our meeting with the Sao Paulo Governor.  What issues
do we have or what do you want me to say to him regarding our assets in this
area.  Even if it's to compliment on something, that's fine.

JB.- The State of Sao Paulo, Mario Covas team are to be congratulated by the
skillful manner that they have conducted the gradual privatization of energy
sector.  Covas is very influential. His current battle deals with tax reforms
in Brazil. He is fighting a system of tax-preferences in other states to
attract industries, which ultimately creates a Federal burden and
consequently a Sao Paulo burden.

The Petrobras control issue of the gas sector should have resonance.

I assume we have no key issues in Chile at this time.

JB.- There may be some but I a blissfully unaware of them. I would be
interested on what you pick up

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/15/2000 01:45 PM ---------------------------

Denise M Macedo
02/15/2000 06:50 AM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Gazeta Mercantil - Terry Thorn

Hi guys,

1. Gostaria de saber se esta declara??o faz parte de um projeto consciente da
Enron em enfrentar a Petrobr?s ou se foi um descuido do porta-voz.

2. Caso a imprensa nos procure para repercutir tal declara??o que, suponho,
vai gerar umarea??o extremamente negativada Petrobr?s, existe alguma
estrat,gia,
 key messages, etc?

Vocs pretendem falar sobre o assunto? O que ser? dito???Thanks??Denise???04. GAZETA: Energia , o alvo dos empres?rios americanos??BRAS?LIA, 15 de fevereiro de 2000 - Empres?rios norte-americanos que ?acompanharam o secret?rio de Com,rcio, William Daley, destacaram o setor de ?energia ?no Brasil como a principal ?rea para investimentos no Pa?s. Segundo o ?vice-presidente da Enron, Terrence Thorn, por,m, 'o monop?lio exercido pela ?Petrobras? tem que acabar para que o setor se desenvolva. Todos devem competir, ?inclusive a estatal'.?Um dos obst?culos ,, de acordo com ele, 'a sombra que a Petrobras faz sobre o ?mercado de energia no Brasil'. O executivo norte-americano lembra que a ?decis?o do governo brasileiro de estabelecer um pre?o ?nico para o g?s ?natural em todo o pa?s , um claro exemplo de medidas que devem ter seus dias ?contados. 'Ficamos confusos ao saber de tal decis?o'. Terrence Thorn acredita ?que um monop?lio estatal pode ser negativo . concorrncia e que a
privatiza??o
da Petrobras ter? que ocorrer um dia.
Para ele, o processo de privatiza??o de energia no Brasil vem sendo conduzido
de forma eficaz, 'mas o Pa?s ainda n?o concluiu o projeto de desregulamenta??o
 (liberalizar o pre?o do g?s natural, por exemplo) e h? muito trabalho pela
frente'. Segundo Thorn, as empresas estrangeiras de energia podem oferecer
servi?os
 inovadores para o setor.
'O problema , que o mercado n?o est? preparado'. Ele defende que as novas
fases da desregulamenta??o do setor energ,tico no Pa?s sejam debatidas por
toda
a sociedade.
O interesse dos norte-americanos pelo setor p"de ser visto na pr?pria
composi??o da miss?o de empres?rios ao Brasil. Das 20 empresas que viajaram
com
 Daley, dez eram do setor de energia. O representante da Agncia de ?Desenvolvimento e Com,rcio dos Estados Unidos (USTR), Albert Angulo, ainda ?informou? que o ?rg?o est? analisando cinco oportunidades de investimentos dos EUA no ?mercado de energia do Brasil. 'Realizamos estudos de viabilidade para que? empresa venham ao Pa?s, mas o certo , que uma maior desregulamenta??o do ?setor energ,tico seria muito positivo para as empresas norte-americanas', diz.?A vice-presidente da empresa Energy Conversion Devices, Nancy Bacon, defende ?que o governo brasileiro deixe de gastar recursos com a gera??o de energia ?em locais distantes e passe a comprar tecnologias alternativas dos ?norte-americanos. 'Para locais de dif?cil acesso, como a Amaz"nia, a ?tecnologia de fotoc,lulas? , a grande solu??o para suprir o d,ficit energ,tico do Brasil'. (Gazeta ?Mercantil/P?gina A4) (Jamil Chade)????????????


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 01:32
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/18/2001 01:31 PM
To: dpedigo@intergen.com
cc:

Subject: CA re energy management services

Doug,

Here's the revised CA.  I highlighted the changed terms.  In addition, I
deleted the prior paragraph 11 which said that the agreement supercedes a
prior CA.

I don't know if the InterGen indentity and signatory are the same,  but
obviously I left that for you to determine.  I expect that the Enron entity
which will bid will be EPMI, so I used that entity.

I beefed up the definition of confidential information due to the complexity
of the issues, and I added 6 months to  the term since things won't get
cranked up for a while.

I look forward to talking to you at your convenience.  Have a good weekend.

Kay


Taffy - my last name is spelled "Shackleton".  Thanks.  ss


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
05:41 PM ---------------------------

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 03/07/2001 04:19:01 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: latest roster - Rice

Let's try this again! - Pam

>Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:13:42 -0600
>To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>From: Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu>
>Subject: latest roster - Rice
>
>Here is your latest roster for MGMT 656. Let me know if you need the list
>of e-mail addresses or if there are any discrepancies that I should
>address. Thanks for your help! - Pam (713-348-6223)

 - 656.doc


The Enron Oral History Project Continues...

"Using History to Help Enron Become the World's Leading Company"

How can an understanding of strategic choices, regulatory change and
corporate culture help Enron achieve its vision?

Speaker:
Joseph Pratt, Cullen Professor of History and Business, University of Houston
and
 Co-Director, Enron Oral History Project

Thursday, June 7
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
EB 5C2

To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1

Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.

Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to
participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390.


On September 27, 2001, ISO New England Inc. filed proposed amendments to its Special Interim Market Rule
originally filed with the Commission on November 1, 2000.  Protests and interventions are due Oct. 29.
Please let me know if you need further information.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


first port of call, a Matt Dawson any other queries should be raised with
Paul Simons

regards,

Aaron.

From: Sara Shackleton on 03/10/2000 08:23 CDT
To: Aaron Armstrong/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Morgan Stanley Capital Servides

Aaron:  You never told me who in London negotiated the EnronCredit.com Ltd.
agreement with Morgan!  I can try to work off of that ISDA.  Thanks.  Sara


Here is the information requested.

Thanks,

LaShonda V. LaDay
713-853-4227


Melissa -
I think we've finally reached a conclusion on the long term PX Index deals.
I've entered the following comment in the six deals still in the system with
Constellation at the old index:

Constellation and EPMI have agreed to leave deal at PX Index. Counterparties'
positions tie out - index price should not be relevant; however, index offset
will. Per Bob Badeer, 4/18/01. KS

This is exactly how Bob explained it to me, and he said it was exactly as
Constellation understood it as well. So if this sounds good to you, I think
we're set. If not, please let me know and we can make whatever changes are
necessary.

The deal numbers, for reference, are -
453152/453175/453294/462109/471888/471889

Thanks for your patience on this,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/17/2001 11:02 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I guess if he wants to leave the deals as they are in the system then
the accounting group will see zero for an index price and they will see the
index off set price.  If he and Constellation both agree to do nothing to
these trades (not to revise the confirms or change the index on the trades)
then we can put notes in the trades explaining that.  I just want to make
sure that Constellation agrees with however we handle this.

Thanks for your help,
Melissa

   Kate Symes                04/17/2001 12:28 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

I asked Bob about these this morning, and he said he's still got to work this
out with Constellation. The way he explained it, our position is flat with
Constellation, so for settlements purposes we're okay - i.e. We've bought the
same volumes that we've sold, and we end up losing a bit due to the index
offset - but otherwise the index price won't make a difference.  But I
suspect he's not thinking of the problem from the confirmation standpoint.
Could you tell me exactly what needs to happen to clear this up on your end
so that I can explain it to Bob in a way that might make him DO something?
I'm sorry for the delay on this - I'm getting ready to call Bob's contact at
Constellation for him.

Let me know what your ideal solution would be. Should we get Constellation to
agree to the Dow Jones index? Or should we change the deals to forward fixed
price? We'll fix this today - I promise.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/17/2001 08:12 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, any news on these Constellation Cal PX trades?
Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
09:06 AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/30/2001 12:57 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

I just talked to Bob, and I don't know if he's responded yet, but I thought
I'd fill you in anyway. He's been talking to his contact at Constellation
about changing these deals over, but hasn't received a concrete answer yet.
I've reminded him and he said he WILL talk to the guy and resolve it today.
I'll keep on it, and let you know when these deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/29/2001 11:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I hate to bug you with this.  Whenever you can spare a second would
you ask Bob about this?  I am afraid it is going to slip through the cracks.

Thanks for your help!
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hi Bob, I was wondering if you have contacted Constellation about the 6
trades that are in the system with the Cal Px as the index price.  All of
these trades start flowing in July of this year.

The deal numbers are as follows:

453152.01
453175.01
453294.01
462109.01
471888.01
471889.01

Let me know if Constellation agrees to change these deals to the Dow Jones so
I can send a letter for them to sign.

Thanks,
Melissa


how did it go today?

>>> <Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com> 11/27/00 06:53AM >>>

Good Morning Derek,

I just wanted to thank you for being such a good friend.  I really need
someone to talk to  and you were there for me!  I 'll never forget
that........  Anyway, I will call Mr. Rustay first thing this morning.
Thank you again for the number.

She did call me last night and I took the "HIGH" road like you said and
everything you said was going to happen did.  She is not coming back here!!
I'll let you know what Mr. Rustay says about my situation.  Thanks again
for everything.  You truly are a great friend.

-Joe Step

"Derek Leon" <dleon@bracepatt.com> on 11/26/2000 09:29:55 PM

To:   <joe.stepenovitch@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: george rustay

Joe,

This is the name and number of the attorney we talked about and the name of
the person referring you (Jenn, who works with me, is George's future
daughter-in-law).  Hope this helps - keep me posted buddy.

D-

>>> Jennifer Garnett 11/26/00 09:01PM >>>
713.940.6003


I was told that I will need an employee number in order to enter the hours
I've worked this week. Is this something I should have already? Please let me
know whenever you get a free moment.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001
03:54 PM ---------------------------

Carolyn Cooney
07/05/2001 04:29 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: No Will High Bills Presentation

Here is the revised presentation.


Sorry, I left you off the original list.

Thanks,
Wanda
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 06:23
PM ---------------------------

Wanda Curry
03/09/2000 06:22 PM
To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry
Pearce/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Prudency

Please see the attached draft prudency policy and prudency schedule.  Barry,
I need your comments ASAP.   I am in meetings until around 11:00 tomorrow.
I don't think we can argue that we no longer need prudency without it being a
change in accounting policy.  This years Annual Report FN-3 stills contains
the following statement:

  The values are adjusted to reflect the potential impact of liquidating
Enron,s position in
  an orderly manner over a reasonable period of time under present market
conditions.

I think the best we can argue is 1)that the liquidity in some commodities
(gas for U.S. and maybe power for U.K.) has increased to a level that
prudency is no longer required and 2)setting a minimum level of VAR before
prudency is required are not a wholesale change in our accounting policy.

I have not attempted to address establishing an operational reserve.  I think
the two are separate, but no reason why we can't create one this quarter.

Wes, I need to get with you to determine what ENA would like to do.  The
earnings situation may be different than expected.  ENA has taken a large
amount out of prudency (see the attached schedule).  We can probably argue
for that release to be reduced, pending complete research on power liquidity
and implementation of the new RAC calculation.  I obviously will not hold any
discussions with AA.

Let me know what the next steps are.  I will be waiting to hear from you both.

Wanda


----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 09:47 AM -----

	Susan Flynn
	05/22/2000 09:12 AM

		 To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Charlie Hoang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Assignment and Amendment of ISDA Master Agreement with Delmarva
Power & Light Company

 We have received the executed Assignment and Amendment of ISDA Master
Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2000, between Delmarva Power & Light Company
("Delmarva"), Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc. ("Conectiv Energy")  and ENA.
This agreement   (i) assigns all of Delmarva's right, title and interest in
and to the ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1998,  between ENA
and Delmarva to Conectiv Energy, (ii) amends  the "Threshold Amount" in Part
1(b) of the Schedule to $100,000,000 for ENA, Conectiv Energy, and each of
their Credit Support Providers, (iii) adds in certain other legal form
changes, and (iv) adds a counterparty Guaranty issued by Conectiv (Conectiv
Energy's Credit Support Provider) in favor of ENA in the amount of
$10,000,000.   Copies of the documents will be distributed.


John,

The credit contact at TXU is Chris Papousek 713-210-5085.

Thanx,

Chris


Attached is a newly revised Credit Watch listing.  If there
are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution,
please insure that they receive a copy of this report.

To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at 5-7095, Brant Reves at x3-9897, Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or the Global
Credit Hotline at x3-1803.


Have you decided about Dukes requested changes to the credit terms!!!!!!!!!
Please let me know asap.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
08:35 AM ---------------------------

"Sean Mayers" <smmayers@earthlink.net> on 06/07/2000 11:53:31 PM
To: "Smetana, Scott" <ssmetana@kumc.edu>, "Moon, Chad" <moonlaunch@aol.com>,
"Hiatt, Drew" <jhiatt@kumc.edu>, "Giron, Darron" <dgiron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Priceless Series .........

----- Original Message -----
From: "corb krmarek" <mtboxer@hotmail.com>
To: <jamesm02@hotmail.com>; <andalee@hotmail.com>; <kthomps@hotmail.com>;
<IYQall21@aol.com>; <tupu77@yahoo.com>; <frodo104@hotmail.com>;
<lucanose@hotmail.com>; <grambocat@hotmail.com>; <mlrust3@yahoo.com>;
<mattymt@yahoo.com>; <mjdubois@msn.com>; <smoothysmoothy@hotmail.com>;
<nschmoll@hotmail.com>; <msierra@u.washington.edu>; <extrasuds@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 2:00 PM
Subject: Fwd: Priceless Series .........

>
>
>
> >From: "TREVOR LIVESAY" <tlivesay@hotmail.com>
> >To: CJS2830@HOTMAIL.COM, MTBOXER@HOTMAIL.COM, DCDRIVIN@AOL.COM,
> >KATIENEWMACK@HOTMAIL.COM, BCOCHRAN_2000@YAHOO.COM, ANP@DIGISYS.NET,
> >MTMATT@MSN.COM, JASONNEWMACK@HOTMAIL.COM, LOVON@MSN.COM,
KORNICK@SOFAST.NET
> >Subject: Priceless Series .........
> >Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:37:11 PDT
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>

 - Pricelessbeaver.jpg
 - 1priceless.jpg
 - priceless3.jpg
 - PricelessPants.jpg
 - Priceless2.jpg
 - pricelessrevenge.jpg
 - pricelessBJ.jpg


How could I resist such an opportunity?

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           09/28/2000 10:37 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse Contract

Kay -

I hate to put you through dental surgery, but are you available to help vet
EE&CC's numbers with Brian Barto and Gavin Gaul?  Before I complete
negotiations with Westinghouse on LD's, I want to make sure the Yahoos'
understanding of the contract is correct.

Thanks,

Mitch


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042224.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 24 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  70.85 / Final:  70.82)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


chris - just finished entering deals

jeff - 549013 - changed to APB from Prebon

548756 - changed to 82.52

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:28 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deals

chris
selling bp energy
111.00
25 mw
sp15
april
off peak

jeff
selling bp energy
205.00
25 mw
pv
april
on peak

548756
broker has 82.52

thanks


Ashley.

FYI. What about Oct 16?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
05:35 PM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/23/2000 11:46:19 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Dear Vince.
I sent you a reply earlier this month but I haven't heard from you about the
date of your visit. Our department has a Seminar every Monday. If you can
schedule your visit on a Monday I would like to invite you to give a seminar
which will be attended by many of our graduate students and faculty and will
give you an opportunity to tell them about your program. With sufficient
lead-time I can advertise the seminar in the Hass school to their financial
engineering students.
Shmuel.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<ashley.baxter@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

> Shmuel,
>
> I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram Sogomonian, a
> good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible, among
> other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or technical
> backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give you a
> call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would join me
> as well.
>
> I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst / Associate
> Program.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
> Vincent Kaminski
> Managing Director - Research
> Enron Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street
> Room EB1962
> Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
> Phone: (713) 853 3848
> Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
>


FYI:  I see that you were left off the list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Warner, John
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Superty, Robert; Jaquet, Tammy; Pinion, Richard; Sullivan, Patti; Lamadrid, Victor; Wynne, Rita; Mcclure, Mark; Baxter, Bryce; Hall, Bob M
Cc: Pena, Matt; Rao, Ramesh
Subject: Unify Gas Team Status Report

I just wanted to give everyone a quick update on what the Unify team is working on these days.  Here's a quick summary of where we're focusing our time (above and beyond production support activities):

Performance Tuning - We are continuing our efforts to optimize stored procedures.  During the month of November we collected a great deal of metrics on stored procedure resource consumption.  That data has been analyzed and as a result we have a list of roughly 25 stored procedures that may require attention (some of them may already be as efficient as possible).  I've attached a spreadsheet which summarizes our efforts.  The spreadsheet contains mostly technical information, but if you take a look at the "Area" column you will see which areas are impacted by these procedures.
NewCo Project Planning - We have spent a great deal of time developing hardware and software inventories in support of the ongoing NewCo discussions.  We're also beginning detailed planning around reconfiguring hardware, modifying applications as necessary, testing, etc. that will be required should we go forward with a new trading entity.
Security Refresh - In light of recent layoffs and in anticipation of forming a new entity, we are doing a complete refresh of our system security components.  This includes disabling old accounts, resetting all server passwords, resetting master application passwords, etc.
Application Runbooks - We have a tremendous amount of documentation on the Unify system.  However, we have never put together complete runbooks.  Runbooks are designed to document all application components, communicate operational procedures, specify instructions for building the Unify application and migrating components to production, etc.  This information will be critical in the event we move forward with NewCo.
EDI Rewrite - We are still actively working on this project (albeit more slowly than a month ago).  Matt's team is delivering a demo of scheduled quantities in early January.  We're reluctant to provide revised target dates due to our expectation that NewCo planning will delay things, but at this point we think a February delivery timeframe is likely.
Projects On Hold - The following projects have been put on hold due to resource constraints:
Booking Statement
Database Split


This is for all the little people being kept down by the man!  Read
following:

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Valach [mailto:kvalach@tcresidential.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:16 PM
To: Max Gardner; Bob Talbott; Jeff Jelniker; John Garibaldi; Mcollins
Subject: Fw: The "Fair" America...

Thought you might enjoy this
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Wise" <swise@tcresidential.com>
To: "John M. Wise" <jonmac@mo-net.com>; "Bergmann, Chris"
<cbergmann@tcresidential.com>; "Valach, Ken" <kvalach@tcresidential.com>;
"Whelan, Andrew" <jdwhelan@email.msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:38 AM
Subject: Fw: The "Fair" America...

> For when you have time to read. Its funny.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "andiz" <andiz@texas.net>
> To: "Morgan Parker" <twinboys9199@hotmail.com>; "SAMINA MAHMOOD"
> <samina1077@hotmail.com>; <sdennis@hicks-thomas.com>;
<roates@thebuzz.com>;
> "Bryan Hash" <rbhash@yahoo.com>; <POPDUT@AOL.COM>; "michael chamberlain"
> <michaelchamberlain2000@yahoo.com>; <Juicemann@hotmail.com>; "DeVries
Howard
> HD" <Howard.DeVries@AGNA.ZENECA.com>; <FLY2PHX@AOL.COM>; "braswelldiver"
> <braswelldiver@AOL.COM>; <clg@prodigy.net>; "Dennis" <albqden@nmol.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 5:39 PM
> Subject: Fw: The "Fair" America...
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER      CLASSIC VERSION
> > >
> > > The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his
> > > house
> > > and laying up supplies for the winter.  The grasshopper thinks he's a
> > > fool
> > > and laughs and dances and plays in the summer heat. Come winter, the
ant
> > > is
> > > warm and well fed.  The grasshopper has no food or shelter so he dies
> > > out in
> > > the cold.
> > >
> > >
> > > THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER      MODERN VERSION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
> > >
> > > The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long building his
> > > house
> > > and laying up supplies for the winter.  The grasshopper thinks he's a
> > > fool
> > > and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the
> > > shivering
> > > grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant
> > > should
> > > be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving.
> > >
> > > CBS, NBC and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering
> > > grasshopper
> > > next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled
> > > with
> > > food. "America" is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be,
that
> > > in a
> > > country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so
?
> > >
> > > Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody
> > > cries
> > > when they sing "It's Not Easy Being Green". Bill and Hillary Clinton
> > > make a
> > > special appearance on the CBS Evening News to tell a concerned Dan
> > > Rather
> > > that they will do everything they can for the grasshopper who has been
> > > denied
> > > the prosperity he deserves by those who benefited unfairly during the
> > > Reagan
> > > summers, or as Bill refers to it as "Temperatures of the 80's".  Jesse
> > > Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the
> > > news
> > > stations film the group singing "We shall overcome."  Jesse than has
the
> > >
> > > group kneel down to pray to God for the Grasshopper's sake. (while
> > > making
> > > certain that the cameras are rolling).  Al Gore exclaims in an
interview
> > > with
> > > Peter Jennings that the ant has gotten rich off the backs of the
> > > grasshopper
> > > and calls for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his
"fair
> > >
> > > share".  Finally the EEOC drafts the "Economic Equity and Anti-Ant
Act",
> > >
> > > retroactive to the beginning of the summer.  The ant is fined for
> > > failing to
> > > hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to
> > > pay his
> > > retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government. Hillary
> > > gets
> > > her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a defamation suit
> > > against
> > > the ant, and the case is tried before a panel of federal judges that
> > > Bill
> > > appointed from a list of single-parent welfare recipients who can only
> > > hear
> > > cases on Thursday between 1:30 and 3:00 PM when there are no talk
shows
> > > scheduled. The ant loses the case.  The story ends as we see the
> > > grasshopper
> > > finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government
house
> > > he is
> > > in, which just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around him
> > > since
> > > he doesn't maintain it.  The ant has disappeared in the snow,. And on
> > > the TV,
> > > which the grasshopper bought by selling most of the ant's food, they
are
> > >
> > > showing Bill Clinton standing before a wildly applauding group of
> > > Democrats
> > > announcing that a new era of "fairness" has dawned in America
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for
the electrical commodity in California.  This approach in any RFP would help
us get the best bid possible for a solicitation.

I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating
adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for
privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system.  Given this, we
have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your
resolution of the content of the RFP.  We cannot request any dispositive
action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately
characterize the elements of the transaction.  Please advise us, as early as
possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its
inclusion will be structured.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     9:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Enable routing on new router ecn-34-cor-ccr1
Environments Impacted:  ENS
Purpose: This router will be used to connect to the new building
Backout: remove routing on the router.
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  AEP
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Shutting off the internal link to 1201 Louisiana
Environments Impacted:  AEP
Purpose: Company occupying that space has been sold.
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
                        Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

Impact:  ENS/GCO
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001    thru Wed 7/4/2001
Outage:  HPL migration to AEP
Environments Impacted:  GCO
Purpose: Sites sold
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
		Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     8:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Reboot Enron.com edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption. Intermettent disruption to last about five minutes.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	John Shupak          713-853-7943
		Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


Have I written you back yet?  It is such a zoo, I can't remember.  I've
started this email 3 times.

I'm going to the Astros game on Thursday in the Diamond seats.  I'll watch
for Ric.  Both Neil and I will be there.  I love those seats.  That's where
I'm sitting on opening day, also.  I'm sure you will be at a game soon.
Remember how nice it was this time last year for those first games?  It is no
nice with the roof open. How many games do you have tickets to this year?

They have James Coney Island outside today.  I ate most of two hot dogs.  I
bet I'll be sleepy soon.  I brought them back up here, so my office will
probably still smell like chili when  you come back.

Guess I'd better get back to work.  Rest up and get well.

Kay

suzanneadams@att.net on 03/30/2001 08:21:13 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Thursday

Things must be busy since I didn't hear from anyone
yesterday.  Ric is going to the Rockets game on Tuesday
with vendors and the Astros Diamond Seats with vendors
on Thursday.  I was wondering if you could come over and
visit after work next Thursday.  We could have drinks
and visit.  That way I wouldn't be all alone!!!

Ruthie's surgery went well, but she isn't feeling very
good.  She's throwing up from the pain meds I think.  We
haven't given her any more, but you can see her cringing
as she breathes.  Bless her heart, I know how she feels.

Well, you won't be moving until I get back, so it'll be
interesting to see what happens.  I wonder if you'll get
a promotion.  I bet women problems won't even phase Ben,
but maybe, we can always hope!  Usually you say female
problems, and the men run the opposite direction.

I just got finished paying bills!  Boy, do I have a lot
of them!

I'm anxious to be able to go to the Astros game.  We
have tickets for this coming weekend but I won't be able
to go.  I can't remember when our next regular season
tickets are since I don't have my calendar in front of
me.

I'm going to venture out to get my nails done today
(drive).  I feel pretty good, so it should be ok.  I'm
sure I am going to be SO READY to come back to work.
I'm so glad I have email so I can keep in touch every
day so I won't miss you TOO much!

Tell Neil I miss his calls too!  Walking around downtown
sounds like fun.  It'll be like in New Orleans.  We just
go from bar to bar, restaurant to restaurant.

Did Carlos' wife ever have her baby?  When is the
seminar in Newport Beach.  Can I come with you to assist
you?????????

Take care!  Miss you!
>
> Well, things are hopping around work!  Dan and I have barely had time to
> say hello, and you know how I am about getting my dose of Dan.  I've got
> several deals going great guns, so you know how that goes. I had lunch with
> Stuart and Kathleen today, and that was fun.  Neil and I have a date night
> tomorrow, so we are trying to decide what to do.  I suggested we just walk
> around the downtown hot spots, if the weather is nice.
>
> I've got diamond seat tickets for next Tuesday's opener.  I'm going to tell
> Ben that I have female problems and have to go to the gyno so he will leave
> me alone.  I figure if that doesn't do it, nothing will.  Neil gets to go
> with me, which is really nice.  It is a 4 o'clock game, which I think is a
> neat time.  Daylight savings time starts next week, so I guess the sun will
> be setting as the game ends.  I'm glad baseball season is back, although I
> did gave away our tickets to tomorrow's game.
>
> Carlos and his wife waited around all day to be called in to go to the
> hospital so she could be induced.  Texas Women's was too busy to take them.
> They finally called them in at 700 tonight to come in, so I guess they will
> have a late night.
>
> You bottle of bubbly is in my kitchen.  I keep hoping to have an hour to
> bring it by.  I figure it will be good  no matter when you get it.
>
> My transfer to Power Trading is back on.  I think some of the work I do is
> transferring with me, but I'm not sure.  In short, I don't know what the
> difference will be.  It isn't supposed to happen until May, so I'm not
> giving it too much thought.  Elizabeth gave me a brochure for another
> seminar - this one in Newport Beach at the Four Seasons.  I'm liking the
> sound of it!
>
> I miss you terribly, as does Neil.
>
> Take care and get well quickly.  It isn't the same without you!!!!!
>
> Kay
>
>
>
>
> suzanneadams@att.net on 03/29/2001 12:02:16 PM
>
> To:   dan.lyons@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, kaye.ellis@enron.com,
>       dina.snow@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Thursday
>
> Anything going on that I should know about.  Just
> checking in.  I'm doing fine, feel great!
>
>
>
>
>


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/12/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,853
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,363
Total Life to Date Transactions	519,543

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/12/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,139	76%
Enron Europe Limited	186	36%
Global Products	103	24%
Enron Metals	425	14%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,907,809,629
MTD	33,542,282,802
LTD	312,712,699,847
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,421,867,459

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,686,492,328

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	607
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	4
Number of Products Offered Today	1,046
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,256
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,979


EPRM DEC JAN


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001
11:22 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jay Reitmeyer                           05/03/2001 11:03 AM

To: stanley.horton@enron.com, dmccarty@enron.com
cc:
Subject: California Summary

Attached is the final version of the California Summary report with maps,
graphs, and historical data.

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Additional California Load Information

Additional charts attempting to explain increase in demand by hydro, load
growth, and temperature.  Many assumptions had to be made.  The data is not
as solid as numbers in first set of graphs.


The results are in...I've developed the pictures from the 'pub bash' in
London and this picture takes first prize - no bias intended.  How many pints
did he have?

On another note, I will be send the photos + negatives via FEDEX today to
Tracy Ralston's attention.

Kelly, I've developed a set of doubles, so let me know if you would like to
see them - there is a great picture of you and Jackie.

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:30 AM -----

	Simon Shih
	11/20/2000 08:59 AM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Who is that masked man?


We have considered, discussed, and researched the issue of whether, by
"substituting named plaintiffs" instead of simply designating some of the 80+
individual plaintiffs as class reps, plaintiffs' attorneys effectively
nonsuited all but the three named plaintiffs, and thus whether they must
re-add them to pursue their claims individually.  Our conclusion was that the
substitution was probably tantamount to a nonsuit, and that the plaintiffs
would have to be re-added.

While considering potential trial on the merits, however, I was reminded
that Intratex filed a counterclaim in 1996, to effectively hold the lawsuit
in Harris County.  At the time, we had some concern that plaintiffs would
nonsuit and refile in Midland, which they might perceive to be a friendlier
forum, and a forum more scary to Enron, in light of the jury's verdict in the
Conoco v. Northern case (a verdict subsequently overturned on appeal.)  The
question thus arises:  does the presence of the counterclaim affect our
original answer to the nonsuit question?  The inquiry is actually somewhat
circular:  the First Amended Counterclaim, filed in April 1996,  is against
"Richard Beeson, Eclipse Oil & Gas, Inc., O'Neill Properties, Ltd., and all
other plaintiffs in the above-style action...."  Thus, if the other
individual plaintiffs were effectively nonsuited, arguably they weren't
counterclaimed against either.  I wanted to call this to your attention,
however.

It bears noting that the answer to the nonsuit question does not, as of now,
affect limitations on the non-class-rep plaintiffs' main claims, breach of
contract and fraud, which are governed by a 4-year statute.  That is because
limitations as to all would-be class members is tolled from the time
certification was sought until, at the earliest, it was reversed by the
Supreme Court.  Plaintiffs claimed they first learned of their claims in late
September or October of 1994.  They sought certification on February 16,
1996.  If they were nonsuited, under general nonsuit law their claim would
not be tolled during the pendency of their original individual lawsuit
pre-certification (a year and 4 months).  It is unclear how much tolling has
occurred between March 9, 2000 and now.  Did tolling resume as of the time
plaintiffs moved to redefine class, or as of the later time when they filed
their supplemental motion for certification?  But evening assuming, for the
sake of argument, that all tolling ceased as of the time the Texas Supreme
Court reversed certification on March 9, 2000, only about another 7 months
can be added to the year and 4 months.  So limitations would not have run on
the 4-year claims.  (Plaintiffs are, however, cutting it close on their
2-year claims, such as negligence and negligence per se.)


Kay:

Note the following timetable from the final version of the ENA/PPL letter
agreement:

(1)  ENA agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the final
form of the turbine contract on or before April 11, 2001.
(2)  The parties agreed to commercially reasonable efforts to execute an
escrow agreement on or before April 16, 2001.
(3)  The escrow account must be funded 3 business days after the later of
(a) ENA's delivery of the final form of the turbine contract and (b) the
closing of PPL's financing.
(4)  ENA can terminate if the escrow is not funded on or before April 19,
2001 (but this date gets pushed back by one business day for each business
day beyond April 11, 2001 that ENA delivers the final form of the turbine
contract).
(5)  The closing occurs at least 5, but not later than 10, business days
after funding the escrow account.
(6)  Either party may terminate if the closing has not occurred on or before
May 3, 2001.

If ENA delivers the final form of the turbine contract on April 11, 2001,
then the April 19, 2001 right to terminate stands.  PPL's obligation to fund
the escrow would then be determined by the date of its loan closing.  Greg
Lang advises that they are working on PPL's financing, but he did not give
an estimated date for financial closing.

I advised Greg on Friday that the legal opinions from both GE and Enron were
causing heartburn.  He agreed to pass this along to Isabel Parker.  He asked
today about GE's reaction to the consent document and if it would be
appropriate for Isabel Parker to contact GE directly at this point.  He also
requested a draft of the escrow disbursement instructions.  When you get a
chance, please advise of any comments in order that we can circulate for
PPL's review.  Also, we need to contact Citibank to clear the proposed form
of escrow agreement (and the anticipated disbursement instructions) and to
negotiate the fee.  Let me know if we can assist in this regard.  Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


please stop sending these to me.  it is embarrassing.


This is from PIRA.  There stuff is usually quite good.  To go farther back
than '98 would require special work on their part.  The person at PIRA
basically indicated that such data would come straight from the WSCC/NERC.
So that really leaves the WSCC suggestion as being the only viable one if you
want a long-term view.

Alan
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Morris Greenberg" <morris@pira.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Morris+20Greenberg+22+20+3Cmorris+40pira+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:12 PM
To: acomnes@enron.com
Subject: WSCC Summer Reserve Margins

See attached spreadsheet.

Regards,

Morris
 - WSCC Reserve Margins.xls


Per Paul...

 <<ENRON.ML.Assignment.11.13.00.revised.doc>>

Phil Franz
Transaction Management/Equity Derivatives
Lehman Brothers
(212)526-8482
pfranz@lehman.com
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and
> should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an
> offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its
> subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
> information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
> such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>

 - ENRON.ML.Assignment.11.13.00.revised.doc


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Knowledge Center Mtg - Lynn's office for Sheila Nacey

Date:		8/31/2000
Time:		10:00 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dan,

We may change the wire transfer to a check.......I am trying to find out why
they don't want to use the wire transfer option.
On section 5, I do not want to add the proposed sentences.
Section 8, I am explaining to WestPort that this would only be done fo good
and reasonable cause.
Section 9, Do we have a problem making the assignment language bi lateral??
Section 11, I am trying to find out why they want to add the sentence.

Mike

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl @ ECT                           12/21/99 07:28 AM

To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Mike,
 Are we sticking with wire transfer as the method for payment?  I assume that
we are.
 Section 5 Pressures -  Is there any need to include the two sentences they
proposed at the end of that section?  I assume there is not.
 I see no need to make any of the changes proposed in Sections 8,  9 & 11.
Do you agree?
 Assuming you are okay with the above I have attached a revised contract both
red-line and clean for your review.

Michael J Legler@ENRON
12/20/99 02:49 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Dan,

The breakout of $0.20 for field gathering, $0.15 for compression plus actual
fuel and shrink, and $0.15 for Ft. Union gathering works for me.

The last line of Section 2.1 is a problem. We cannnot guarantee a Feb 15.
date. I would like to put that we will endeavor to install the facilities as
quickly as conditions allow after the required permits are received by Enron
.
Section 4.2 - I don't agree with 90 days......I would settle on 45 days.

In the General Terms and Conditions definitions we need to leave dehydrator
fuel and dehydrating terms in under Equivalent Quantities and Gathering.
Under Quality the 6% by volume of total inerts must stay.

Let me know what you have a problem with.

Thanks,
Mike

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl @ ECT                           12/20/99 12:25 PM

To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Westport

Yes,  Let me know if you agree with their breakout of the fee components.
20/15/15.  If so I will change the agreement back and incorporate their other
changes for comment.

Michael J Legler@ENRON
12/20/99 11:17 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Westport

Dan,

Westport will go along with breaking up the service into field gathering,
gathering and compression.
Let me know where to go from here.
Is this just a matter of changing everything back the way it was with the
exception of the Gathering Fee section and responding to their other changes?

Mike
303-575-6488


did they look lazy?  they always seem over-confident.


-----Original Message-----
From: The Power Marketing Association <info@pmaconference.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:14:04 -0500 (EST)
To: mcarson@gtemail.net
Subject: Register for the Next TXU Capacity Auction!
Register for the next TXU Energy Capacity Auction!

New Registration Due Date is February 11, 2002!

TXU Energy is again conducting an electric capacity auction in ERCOT.  This auction will consist of monthly capacity blocks for the prime months of May through August.
600 megawatts will be available on a monthly basis.

Bidders may choose among four types of electric generation, to be auctioned in 25 megawatt blocks:
1. Base-load fossil and nuclear options
2. Intermediate natural gas options
3. Cyclic natural gas options
4. Peaking natural gas options.

Everyone wishing to participate must register, even if you registered before!

To establish your eligibility to bid in the auction, go to

www.txu.com/capacityauction

to obtain credit documents (appendix 4).  If you were a successful bidder in the previous auction you may also register at

www.captrades.com.

The registration deadline is Monday February 11, 2002 at 5 PM Central.  All applications must be received via email or mail by the deadline.

This email has been sent to mcarson@gtemail.net at your
request, by PowerMarketers.com.

Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=mcarson@gtemail.net

View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

Powered by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com

--

_______________________________________________
Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143


I'll come down to your office at 3:25

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Quilkey, Paul
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley; Roberts, Mike A.
Subject:	RE: Weather

Paul,

Let's talk at 3:30 my time on Tuesday.
We shall originate the call.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quilkey, Paul
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:18 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	Weather

Vince
We have not spoken for a while.
Please let me know when you are available to discuss Christian's weather modelling and the potential for assisting North American Wholesale.
thnx
Paul


Please reserve a conference room for up to 7 people for 1 hour on Wednesday,
April 12th around 2:30pm.

thanks


Per the attached memo from Mary Cook, an attorney in the Swap Group, and our
meeting with members of Global Counterparty where we discussed problems with
utilities of cities not being clearly identified, may I suggest the we rename
GPP 98029, Norwich Public Utilities, something like, The City of Norwich,
Connecticut?(which state?), by and through its Public Utilities Department.
(The city utilities are at the bottom of the list.)

Stephanie, we will also need them to resubmit their PA.  Cheryl, we may need
to confirm how we want to set this counterparty up before Stephanie send out
the PA.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 05:36 PM -----

	Samuel Schott/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/16/2001 04:13 PM

		 To: Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES@EES,
Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana
Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya
Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate,
Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber
Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate, Thu Pham
Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Adrian Coleman/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange, Tandra
Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: EOL Approvals: 05-15-01 _ GCP Response

    Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in blue.

        Best Rgds.

        Samuel x3-9890
        Enron Net Works _ Global Counterparty Team

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tom Moran
Sent: Tuesday, May  15, 2001 8:58 PM
To: Karen Lambert; Tana Jones; Samuel Schott; Mark A Taylor; Brant Reves;
Debbie R Brackett; David Hardy; Lesli Campbell; Cynthia Clark; Enron Europe
Global CounterParty; Stephanie Sever; Tom Moran; Claudia Clark; William S
Bradford; Lisa Lees; Juana Fayett; Jana Morse; Trang Le; Paul Maley; Sonya
Clarke; Tim Davies; Karen O'Day; Tanya Rohauer; Kelly Lombardi; Brian
Lindsay; EOL Call Center; Bill D Hare; Amy Heffernan; Molly LaFuze; Danny
Clark; Stephanie Panus; Teresa Mandola; Bill Kyle; Amber Ebow; Wendi Lebrocq
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-15-01

Please see attached

 << File: EOL 05-15-01.xls >>
Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


Please review the attached file.  The books listed for each trader are marked
for removal from the portfolio.  If you are currently using one of these
books or will be using it in the future please highlight the book id in
YELLOW.  If the book is no longer used please highlight the book id in BLUE.
When you have finished please return the file to me.

Thanks for your help,
Robin


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000 02:50
PM ---------------------------

Dave Scott@EES
08/29/2000 07:16 AM
To: FOM Direct
cc: FOM cc
Subject: 1st Revised September FOM volumes

Please see the comments page of the attachment for details of the updates ...
and call me if you have any questions.

David
713-345-7692


?

? Note: forwarded message attached.

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping -  Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
X-Apparently-To: cscott_korea@yahoo.com via web4406.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (207.69.200.157)  by
mta211.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2000 13:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mindspring.com (pool-63.52.62.242.atln.grid.net
[63.52.62.242]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id
QAA02170; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:30:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A22EE98.F74CA09C@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:30:37 -0800
From: Charlee Williamson <bacco1@mindspring.com>
Reply-To: bacco1@mindspring.com
Organization: Ralph Brennan Restaurant Group
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dke1069@hotmail.com, cscott_korea@yahoo.com
Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: FW: Y'allbonics]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------74FCCAAEB593E04064DFB79B"
Content-Length: 6800

Return-Path: <MichaelReiss@aol.com>
Received: from sprinter.com ([192.41.12.102]) by tyner.mail.mindspring.net
(Mindspring Mail Service) with ESMTP id t24uea.rg3.37kbi5q Mon, 27 Nov 2000
10:12:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com (imo-r08.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.8]) by
sprinter.com (8.8.5) id IAA17938; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:11:56 -0700 (MST)
From: MichaelReiss@aol.com
Received: from MichaelReiss@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.33.)
id 5.62.9617640 (673); Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:11:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <62.9617640.2753d38b@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 10:11:07 EST
Subject: Fwd: FW: Y'allbonics
To: hgabel@neworleans-food.com, cwilliamson@neworleans-food.com,
rbrennan@neworleans-food.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_62.9617640.2753d38b_boundary"
X-Mailer: Unknown sub 171
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Here's some great verbage for our new "Southern-concept" restaurant! ?

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????MJR
Return-Path: <patti.micklin@stmsaints.com>
Received: from  rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.201])
by air-ye04.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:07:01 -0500
Received: from  stmfs02.stmsaints.com (mail.stmsaints.com [38.215.63.11]) by
rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:06:42 -0500
Received: by mail.stmsaints.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<VT02T1C0>; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:05:25 -0600
Message-ID: <21D7486AFBE2D21185CA00805FBB164E30FED3@mail.stmsaints.com>
From: Patti Micklin <patti.micklin@stmsaints.com>
To: "Alyson Ray (E-mail)" <ANJRAY5@aol.com>,        "Bobbie & Charlie Yuspeh
(E-mail)" <byuspeh@aol.com>,        "Butzie Reiss (E-mail)"
<blreiss@optonline.net>,        "Dave Micklin (E-mail)"
<MICKTOOTH@aol.com>,        "Gretchen Drennan (E-mail)"
<gretchendrennan@hotmail.com>,        "Leon Reiss (E-mail)"
<LReissOD@aol.com>,        "Linda Grush (E-mail)"
<lgrush@kehoe-france.com>,        "Mike Reiss (E-mail)"
<michaelreiss@aol.com>
Subject: FW: Y'allbonics
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:05:22 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Patti Micklin <patti.micklin@stmsaints.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Subject: Y'allbonics

The Association of Southern Schools has decided to pursue some of the
seemingly endless taxpayer dollar pipeline through Washington designating
Southern slang, or Y'allbonics, as a language to be taught in all Southern
schools. The following are excerpts from the Y'allbonics/English dictionary:

HEIDI - (noun) Greeting.
HIRE YEW - Complete sentence. Remainder of greeting. Usage "Heidi, Hire
yew?"
BARD - (verb) Past tense of the infinitive "to borrow." Usage "My brother
bard my pickup truck."
JAWJUH - (noun) The state north of Florida. Capitol is Lanner. Usage "My
brother from Jawjuh bard my pickup truck."
BAMMER - (noun) The state west of Jawjuh. Capitol is Berminhayum. Usage "A
tornader jes went through Bammer an' left $20,000,000 in improvements."
MUNTS - (noun) A calendar division. Usage "My brother from Jawjuh bard my
pickup truck, and Ah ain't herd from him in munts."
THANK - (verb) Cognitive process. Usage "Ah thank ah'll have a bare."
BARE - (noun) An alcoholic beverage made of barley, hops, and yeast. Usage
"Ah thank ah'll have a bare."
IGNERT - (adjective) Not smart. See "Arkansas native." Usage "Them bammer
boys sure are ignert!"
RANCH - (noun) A tool used for tight'nin' bolts. Usage "Ah thank ah left my
ranch in the back of that pickup truck my brother from Jawjuh bard a few
munts ago."
ALL - (noun) A petroleum-based lubricant. Usage "Ah sure hope my brother
from
Jawjuh puts all in my pickup truck."
FAR - (noun) A conflagration. Usage "If my brother from Jawjuh don't change
the all in my pickup truck, that thing's gonna catch far."
TAR - (noun) A rubber wheel. Usage "Gee, Ah hope that brother of mine from
Jawjuh don't git a flat tar in my pickup truck."
TIRE - (noun) A tall monument. Usage "Lord willin' and the creek don't
rise, Ah sure do hope to see that Eiffel Tire in Paris sometime."
RETARD - (verb) To stop working. Usage "My grampaw retard at age 65."
FAT - (noun), (verb) A battle or combat; to engage in battle or combat.
Usage "You younguns keep fat'n, n' ah'm gonna whup y'uh."
RATS - (noun) Entitled power or privilege. Usage "We Southerners are willin'

to fat for are rats."
CHEER - (adverb) In this place. Usage "Just set that bare rat cheer."
FARN - (adjective) Not domestic. Usage "Ah cuddint unnerstand a wurd he
sed... must be from some farn country."
DID - (adjective) - Not alive. Usage "He's did, Jim."
ARE - (noun) A colorless, odorless gas- Oxygen. Usage "He cain't
breathe..give 'im some ARE!"
BOB WAR - (non) A sharp, twisted cable. Usage "Boy, stay away from that
bob war fence."
JEW HERE - (noun) and (verb) contraction. Usage "Jew here that my brother
from Jawjuh got a job with that bob war fence cump'ny?"
HAZE - a contraction. Usage "Is Bubba smart?" "Nah...haze ignert. He ain't
thanked but a minnit'n 'is laf."
SEED - (verb) past tense of "to see".
VIEW - contraction (verb) and pronoun. Usage "Ah ain't never seed New York
City... 'view?"
GUBMINT - (noun) - A bureaucratic institution. Usage "Them gubmint boys
shore
is ignert."


I'll leave you a voice mail.  Thanks.  sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 12:46 PM -----

	"william stuart" <stuartw17@hotmail.com>
	10/04/2000 10:33 AM

		 To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, steve.jacobellis@enron.com,
shane.dallmann@enron.com, melba.lozano@enron.com, dforster@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Important: EOL Currency Descriptions

Please see the attached currency description for USD/JPY and EUR/USD. Unlike
the USD/CAD par forwards, these products are very straighforward - they are
simple exchanges of currencies at a specific rate on a specific date. For
example, the counterparty agrees to pay USD and receive JPY at 107.00 for
10/31/00. Just a simple forward transaction for internal counterparties
only.

Sara, please review/modify. Our goal is to have these approved so that they
can be added to EOL on Monday or Tuesday of next week.

Thanks,

Stuart
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - EURUSD Description.doc
 - USDJPY Description.doc


I'd be honored.

	Janel Guerrero
	02/06/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: add to CA email distrib

Hi.  Will you add me to your CA distribution list for emails etc ?  thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: Swann, Stacy
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:58 PM
To: Duenner, Anthony; Cohagan, Fred; Clark, Craig; Heng, Choon-Boon;
Roumel, Jonathan; Todd, Chuck; Sarma, P D; Babu, Sobhan; Leahy, Patrick;
Dragon, Appolina; Nunas, Maurice; Hicks, Michelle; Hagerty, Lauren;
Masani, Zal; Fernandes, Beaven; Callaway, Jan
Subject: FW: so, you've been laid off....

:+)

-----Original Message-----
From: stacy swann [mailto:stacy_swann@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:55 AM
To: Swann, Stacy
Subject: Fwd: so, you've been laid off....

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <stacy_swann@yahoo.com>
To: Matt Saaks <mattclimb@hotmail.com>, Stephen <rang1690@yahoo.com>, Yuichi Suda <ysudaPDX@aol.com>, danny swann <dswann@hot.rr.com>, Deb Swann <debswann@starpower.net>, pat swann <swannp@cber.fda.gov>, jim weisser <jimbud@twics.com>, gerard wiener <gerardwiener@hotmail.com>, Ziad Harfouch <ChickBill@aol.com>, anna n kraske <annakraske@hotmail.com>, Paul Kraske <pkraske@yahoo.com>, Melanie LaDue <mladue@lycos.com>, sarah barney <sbarney@brobeck.com>, Francis Chou <ffchou@hotmail.com>, himraj dang <himraj_dang@yahoo.com>, atul davda <adavda@hotmail.com>, Amy Gaskill <gaskill_amy@yahoo.com>, kerry a griffin <kgriffin1@hotmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:53:56 GMT
Subject:

OK - - If you've just been laid off, or think you are
about to get laid off, you've got to sit through this
one...very funny...

Click the link below:

http://216.119.118.64/index2.html

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1


The results are in...I've developed the pictures from the 'pub bash' in
London and this picture takes first prize - no bias intended.  How many pints
did he have?

On another note, I will be send the photos + negatives via FEDEX today to
Tracy Ralston's attention.

Kelly, I've developed a set of doubles, so let me know if you would like to
see them - there is a great picture of you and Jackie.

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:30 AM -----

	Simon Shih
	11/20/2000 08:59 AM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Who is that masked man?


Michael is off school April 13 and 16.  I have 3 deals which are supposed to
close around then, so I'm not optimistic.  If possible, I will take at least
one of those days.

On the summer camp, if we use a camp by you, we will probably lose Charlotte
for the summer.  Does that matter to you?

Kay


EOL - if you mean the GTCs is in addition to the contracts below we require by Thursday.  Mark hasn't left me a message but I'll put a phone call into him.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 3:58 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Contracts

EOL gas by Thursday--we need to talk re whether you want firm and IT combined in the EOL GTC, and discuss masters.  Mark has a call into you for us.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 2:44 PM
To:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	RE: Contracts

Next Tuesday was tomorrow - could we try for Thursday as it really is onerous to get stuff through the new buyer.

Thanks

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 10:41 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	RE: Contracts

I have given Mark Taylor my comments on the financial forms and he will be revising them.  I have met with Van Hooser and Hodge to discuss gas and have spoken with Bradford to get his perspective on gas.  We will be narrowing the menu of forms, revising in respect of certain terms, and studying possible construct changes to assist in credit matters.  Mark mentioned next Tuesday as a target which I will try to meet.  The EOL forms will be completed first.  Any questions, call me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Cook, Mary
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank; Luce, Laura; Lagrasta, Fred; Redmond, Brian; Breslau, Craig
Subject:	Contracts

The gas contracts we need include the following, can you give us timescales. I understand that we have had issues getting these together and time is now running out.  Mark, I believe, has put you in charge or gas -please could you give us a timescale.

Draft Master Firm
Draft Master Swap
GTC (physical)
GTC (financial)

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Suzanne:
I may be in tomorrow but I will leave you a voice mail message one way or
another.  If I don't come in and I haven't used my discretionary day, please
use that, otherwise treat it as a vacation day.  Hope you have a great
weekend.  Be safe!  If it is slow tomorrow afternoon, I have no problem with
you leaving around 4:30 or so.
Carol


Combined post id is 977346 - it's calc'd against tonite's curve.


To:GILBERT-SMITH, DOUGLAS
Email:doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com - 7138539310

Enron Wholesale Services - Office of the Chairman

From:  Mark Frevert, Chairman & CEO
      Mark Haedicke, Managing Director & General Counsel

Subject:  Confidential Information and Securities Trading

To keep pace with the fluid and fast-changing demands of our equity trading activities, Enron Wholesale Services ("EWS") has recently revised its official Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading ("Policies and Procedures").  These revisions reflect two major developments: (1) our equity trading activities have been extended into the United Kingdom, and (2) in an effort to streamline the information flow process, the "Review Team" will play a more centralized role, so that the role of the "Resource Group" is no longer necessary.You are required to become familiar with, and to comply with, the Policies and Procedures.  The newly revised Policies and Procedures are available for your review on LegalOnline, the new intranet website maintained by the Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department.  Please click on the attached link to access LegalOnline:
 http://legalonline.corp.enron.com/chinesewall.asp

If you have already certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year, you need not re-certify at this time, although you are still required to to review and become familiar with the revised Policies and Procedures.  If you have not certified compliance with the Policies and Procedures during the 2001 calendar year, then you must do so within two weeks of your receipt of this message.  The LegalOnline site will allow you to quickly and conveniently certify your compliance on-line with your SAP Personal ID number.  If you have any questions concerning the Policies or Procedures, please call Bob Bruce at extension 5-7780 or Donna Lowry at extension 3-1939.


The attached spreadsheet contains our latest request for daily volumes by
delivery point.   The current day is highlighted in yellow, the following day
is highlighted in green.   Please call if you have questions.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-15-00 Daily volsAM.xls


The funerals of Andy, Darren and Paul, who tragically lost their lives in last Wednesday's explosion at Teesside Power Station, will be held this week at the following times:

Andy Sherwood	2.00pm, Wednesday, August 15
St  James Church, Hartlepool

Darren Higgins	9.15 am, Thursday, August 16
St. Andrews Church, Teesville, Middlesbrough

Paul Surtees		1.30 pm, Thursday, August 16
Easington Church of the Ascension, Easington Colliery

We know that everyone at Enron will want to remember the colleagues we have lost at this difficult time, and our thoughts and prayers are with their families and friends.

We are considering how best to commemorate the lives of Andy, Darren and Paul, and will be discussing our ideas with their families, in due course.

Graeme White is recovering in Middlesbrough General Hospital where his condition remains stable and we are continuing to provide as much support as possible for Graeme and his family.

The plant remains off-line and Enron continues to co-operate fully with the Health & Safety Executive's investigation into the cause of the explosion.

John Sherriff and Michael Brown


Further to your letter to us (addressed to Mr. Tim Belden)  dated August 14,
2000:

Enron thinks that the elimination of physical risk during the month of August
will be of commercial benefit because Enron expects that during the month of
August there will be transmission line derations affecting the hour ahead
market which will lead to TO debit charges by the CAISO.   The elimination
of  TO debit charges is a commercial benefit to Enron.


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


Dear Mr. Henderson:

Attached pursuant to Dave Foti's request is the Substation Maintenance
Agreement in Word format with Transwestern's proposed changes shown in
redlining.  After you've had a chance to review the agreement, please feel
free to contact me with any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Susan Scott
Counsel for Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596
sscott3@enron.com


Has the few changes we discussed.


I figure buying stuff for me and making myself happy is just like making you happy  :)

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 04/24/2001 11:07:54 AM
To:	"'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE: FW

When is that very last one going to kick in?

-----Original Message-----
From:   Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:35 AM
To:     ingrid.immer@williams.com
Subject:        FW

The truth is out there!
--

-------
Subject: FW: A Little Humor to Start Your Day

Computer Gender

An English teacher was explaining to the students
the
concept of gender
association in the English language; noting how
hurricanes at one time were
given only female names, and how ships and planes
were
usually referred to
as "she." One of the students raised her hand and
asked,
"What gender is a
computer?"

The teacher wasn't certain and divided the class
into two
groups:  males
in one, females in the other, and asked them to
decide if
a computer should
be masculine or feminine. Both groups were asked
to give
four reasons for
their recommendations.

    The group of women concluded that computers
should be
referred to as
masculine because:

1. In order to get their attention, you have to
turn them
on.

2. They have a lot of data but are still clueless.

3. They are supposed to help you solve your
problems, but
half the time,
they ARE the problem.

4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that,
if you
had waited a
little longer, you could have had a better model.

    The men, on the other hand, decided that
computers
should definitely be
referred to as feminine because:

1. No one but their creator understands their
internal
logic.

2. The native language they use to communicate
with other
computers is
incomprehensible to everyone else.

3.  Even your smallest mistakes are stored in
long-term
memory for later
retrieval.

4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you
find
yourself spending half
your paycheck on accessories for it.