Chris,

Hello from Houston.  I really enjoyed meeting with you last Saturday at your
gallery.  Your collection of work is very impressive.

I have not received your digital pictures that you were putting together but
I did talk with my wife about the Bonnard.  The Bonnard is my first choice of
all the pieces we discussed.  I found an illustration of it on the net (from
another gallery) and she liked (although - not as much as me).  I am prepared
to purchase a Bonnard and the Radiator is my first choice.  I would like to
establish a relationship and do business with your gallery and would like to
know what is your best price for the piece.  I will not shop the price around
and will make a quick decision with a credit card number.   When I get your
response and if it is competitive, I'll confirm the purchase when I pick up
the email.

Thanks,
Mike McConnell

PS - I will hold off on the others for now and when you send me the pictures
I will show them to my wife for consideration.  I am considering the Mary
Cassat as a gift for her.


Doesn't really count for your group I just include you on all  of those types
of messages - we have a lot of new people who have never worked the system
before.

I agree on the all or nothing - let's talk this afternoon. Its typical Enron
execution I'm afraid - this is our HR departments we are talking about!

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           01/24/2001 08:12 PM

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Bonus Communication

Received your e:mail today about bonus letters not being ready until next
week.  Timing is fine.  However, Brent Price (EGM operations) received bonus
letters for his operations team this afternoon from his HR team.  Brent will
be out of the country on business next week, so he will distribute those
letters right away.

This highlights the issues that I raised earlier this week when I found out
that not all operations personnel had been transferred to ENW as of January
1.  Not only do we have different HR teams with apparently different
directives, but some of my team is still defined as an integral part of a
business unit (EGM and EIM) and the bulk of my team is operating as service
providers through ENW (dedicated of course to the success of Enron Americas,
but somehow starting to feel a bit removed).  I think that Robert Jones is
running down how I can get access to systems that give me information on
operations employees who support EA, EGM and EIM.  While necessary, that is
really not addressing my point.  My conversation with Greg Whalley on moving
operations under Net Works was very explicit on making that an all or nothing
proposition (i.e. we would move ENA, EIM and EGM operations employees under
ENW).  I asked about London, but he deferred at the time on that one.  But
there was not deferral on EIM and EGM.  This movement out of the business
units is not an insignificant change.

I still believe that this needs to be all or nothing.  We have now created
two classes of operations staffs - one that is  part of trading/origination
operating companies and one that is part of Net Works.  The company will
benefit if we can freely move employees from operating company to operating
company to capitalize on skills.  We have done this quite frequently in
operations in the past, moving people from gas to crude products or gas to
paper.  We have now made that hard, because we have operations personnel on
three different payrolls - ENW, EGM and EIM.  This creates assumptions around
value judgements as well.  EIM and EGM personnel are more integrally linked
with their business units than those who support EA.  Over time, this won't
be a good message.   The promotion memo that you plan to send out this week
highlights this problem.  When I asked whether operations personnel under
Brent Price would be included in the memo, the answer seems to be "no",
because "they are not ENW employees".   And yet we ranked and made promotion
decisions on Brent's staff jointly with ENA and EIM operations personnel.  (I
had actually drafted a promotion memo from me that would cover all operations
promotions regardless of business unit that they service, but I will not move
forward with that given that your memo
 will address those promotions - or at least some of them)  This seems like a
small issue but is just a great example of a myriad of complications that
will arise .

My question again is whether this situation is bad execution on someone's
part, or is it reflective of a change in Greg Whalley's view on having all
operations personnel under Net Works?  Have McConnell/Shankman and
McMahon/Bowen lobbied to have their operations personnel remain as an
integral part of their teams, reflected tangibly through remaining EGM and
EIM employees?  If that is the case, I fear that this inconsistency won't
serve the company well as the year progresses.

We have time on the calendar on Friday, so we can discuss this further then.
--Sally


Kate,

Please approve and autoschedule Deal # 474191. It's for 10/1/2000.

Les


Good morning to all of you at Enron.

I wanted to make you all aware of two major new capabilities that FriedWire is soon to deploy.  One will be the new PJM intelligence module that will be an add-on to the existing Traffic Report.  The other is a brand new version of the Traffic Report itself that incorporates real-time electricity prices and news/commentary from THE major provider of this content.  FriedWire will be making some announcements shortly describing the strategic alliance between our firm and this content partner, and should be able to start showing the enhanced, jointly developed version of the Traffic Report in October.

Regarding the PJM module; we are now scheduling 30-40 minute, remote (Internet-based) overviews with clients who actively trade in PJM.  These will begin the week of September 24th.  If any of you or your colleagues would like to participate in a very informal session that looks at the capabilities of this new tool, please contact me and I can help set-up a date and time.  Some of the content and functionality in the PJM module includes:

}         Real time price and load charts that present current conditions in historical context
}         Real-time and day-ahead LMP data along with the public FTR data to provide a real-time estimate of FTR value
}         Easy interface for querying FTR data to provide competitive intelligence in the primary and secondary FTR markets
}         Tools for valuing FTRs in the monthly FTR auction
}         PJM load charts displaying PJM ISO load forecast bias
}         Eastern Interconnect frequency monitoring
}         LMP charts and maps
}         Customizable displays in the form of personalized Watchlists, tables and chart building tools

Thanks and contact me with anything you might need.

Take Care,

Stuart Wright
Director
FriedWire Inc.


Thank you, but shouldn't the products be listed as follows.  GD/D PG&E
CtyG-HHUB, PG&E CtyG-Socal, Socal-Malin, PG&E CtyG-Malin.  Please let me know
what you think.  How would the legal description read?

Thanks,
Mike


Hello! Jacqueline Gayle & Your Kids has just sent you a greeting card from
Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www1.bluemountain.com/cards/box6594f/n4v5idscadak8w.htm

Your card will be available for the next 90 days
This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain greeting cards to friends and family
http://www.bluemountain.com


Best stick with 10:30 then.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


My travel agent is sending me some brochures.  1-800-cruises called back with
more info too.  I will look at it all when I get back and we can discuss.
What about dinner out? Do we still want to do that? If so, dates that work
for you all?

Have a great time at Mom's party next week.  Add my best wishes for any and
all toasts.

Debbie


September 24, 2001

To:  Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers
     and Shippers

Re:  Cash Out Indices - September 2001

    FT                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                2.2638        2.1000	    2.3850
  Zone 2                2.2769        2.1175     2.3875
  Zone 3                2.2900        2.1350     2.3900
  Zone 4                2.3028        2.1471     2.4033
  Zone 5                2.3595        2.2008     2.4619
  Zone 6                2.4054        2.2443     2.5094

    IT                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                2.2638        2.1000     2.3850
  Zone 2                2.2769        2.1175     2.3875
  Zone 3                2.2900        2.1350     2.3900
  Zone 4                2.3435        2.1878     2.4440
  Zone 5                2.5452        2.3865     2.6476
  Zone 6                2.6996        2.5385     2.8036

   FTG                   AVG.          BUY        SELL
  ------                ------        ------     ------
  Zone 1                2.2638        2.1000     2.3850
  Zone 2                2.2769        2.1175     2.3875
  Zone 3                2.2900        2.1350     2.3900
  Zone 4                2.3706        2.2149     2.4711
  Zone 5                2.6690        2.5103     2.7714

                         AVG.          BUY        SELL
                        ------        ------     ------
  FTNT                  2.3025        2.1500     2.4100

For information concerning cash out transactions, please contact
Casilda Vasquez at (713)215-4504.

Stella Yu
Manager - Rate Systems
(713)215-3381

 - C.DTF


---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 05:31 PM
---------------------------

Bradley Diebner
10/25/2000 05:32 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Steel approvals

Please distribute.

Thanks,
Brad


Start Date: 1/20/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012014.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Let me know if this is not what you need.

Hunter

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001
08:36 AM ---------------------------

John Arnold
01/03/2001 08:24 AM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Here is the New Date Bucket format that we need for your mini-benches for the
Benchmark(not the Lavo Bench) for July.

1. July
2. Aug. Index
3. August
4. Sept
5. Oct
6. Nov
7. Dec
8. Jan '01
9. Feb '01-Dec '01
10. Jan '02 - Dec '02
11. Jan-Dec '03
12. Jan-Dec '04
13. Jan '05-Dec '10
14. Jan '11-Dec'15
15. Jan '16-Oct '23

If you have any question give me a call.

Thanks,
Robin
x57478


Southern Trails proposed, at an estimated cost of $155,000,000, a pipeline
project consisting mostly of 693 miles of crude oil pipeline acquired from
ARCO.  Ten percent of the project would be new construction and the remainder
would be conversion of the crude oil line to gas service.  The pipeline
system would be divided into an East Zone and a West Zone.  The East Zone,
which will begin in the San Juan Basin and end at the California border, will
have 87,500 Dth/d of available capacity.  The West Zone, wholly within
California, will have 120,000 Dth/d.

Southern Trails received certificate authority for the project on July
28,2000.  An optional certificate application does not require any showing of
market need; however, Southern Trails did hold an open season from Sept. to
Oct. 1998 during which it received 22 bids totalling 810,000 Dth/d of
demand.  The order issuing the certificate did not say how much of the
capacity had been subscribed, only that Southern Trails had contracted with
its affiliate, Questar Energy, for 30,000 Dth/d of firm capacity in theh East
Zone for 5 years and one month, and taht firm transportation service
agreements of 5 and 10 year terms are "being negotiated" with prospective
shippers which, if executed, would subscribe the balance of the capacity in
both the East and West zones.

TW is an intervenor in this docket so I have received everything that has
been filed.  I have no further information about any further subscription of
capacity.  I also have no information regarding any progress that has been
made on construction.
If you need a more detailed summary of the proposal that was filed at FERC,
or if you have any other questions, please let me know and I'll see what I
can find.  I've got the entire environmental report in my office if we need
that for any reason!


----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000 05:31 PM -----

	Mark E Haedicke
	09/06/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Middle East Pictures

A few of my pictures.   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 04:47 PM -----

	markehaedicke@hotmail.com
	09/04/2000 05:49 AM

		 To: meh41@aol.com, rnavarre@fibertel.com.ar, mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Middle East Pictures

HI:

Just a few pictures from our trip.

Mark

----------------
This Picture Email was created using KODAK Picture CD.
AOL Users, to view the picture sent to you in this Email:
- Click the "Download Now" button at the bottom of this message window
- If an Email Attachment warning is shown, select "Yes" to continue
- Select a location and name for your picture file
- AOL will show the picture as it is downloaded.
For help with viewing pictures in other Email programs, visit
http://www.kodak.com/go/PictureCD and review the FAQs/Support section.
With KODAK Picture CD, it's easy to enhance, share, and organize your
pictures.  Just check the box when you drop off your next roll of film for
processing.  Visit http://www.kodak.com/go/PictureCD for more information.
 - 123_22_1.jpg
 - 121_20_1.jpg
 - 104_3_1.jpg
 - 011_10_1.jpg
 - 009_8_1.jpg
 - 005_4_1.jpg
 - 002_1_1.jpg


See if there is anythiing of use in here for your high tech group messages.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 05:21 PM -----

	Rob Bradley
	09/25/2000 10:31 AM

		 To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Digital Power Demand: JP Morgan Report

The JP Morgan report below gives further credence to the Mills/Huber thesis
of digital-age power growth.  The in-the-trenches story is different from
some of the academic studies by the conservation mavens.

- Rob

 - jp morgan.pdf


Keith,

The article I mentioned.

Vince

***********************************************

rashed By Tax Selling

                  But are there bargains among the discards?

                  By Michael Santoli

                  Here it is more than six months since even the most
intransigent last-minute
                  filers wrote checks to the IRS to render to the government
its due for their
                  financial good fortune in 1999. By rights, this should be a
season relatively
                  free of concerns about taxes, notwithstanding the
presidential candidates'
                  parrying over whose tax-cut math features more fuzz.

                  And yet, for anyone with a dollar in the stock market
(which in recent weeks
                  has likely been reduced to loose change), the looming
demands of this year's
                  levies on capital gains have helped to make this month yet
another taxing
                  October for investors.

                                                 The jump-and-stumble course
the
                                                 major stock indexes have
taken this
                                                 year is being blamed for a
                                                 particularly intense effort
among
                                                 mutual-fund managers and
other big
                                                 investors to sell their
losers. The
                                                 steep ramp-up in stocks that
                                                 persisted from the fall of
1999
                                                 through the first quarter of
this year
                                                 -- led by the technology
                                                 must-haves -- left funds
with ripe
                                                 profit-taking opportunities
when the
                                                 Nasdaq surge flagged in
April. This
                  sell-high activity generated heavy capital gains in many
portfolios -- tax
                  liabilities that managers have been rushing to offset with
realized losses by
                  selling stocks that have cratered.

                  The fact that so many funds are enduring a flat-to-down
year in this difficult
                  market has only added to the urgency. Investors aren't fond
of getting stuck
                  with taxable distributions in even the most flush years of
a bull market. So
                  managers are now trading in fear of how their shareholders
will react to funds'
                  kicking off gains distributions in a year when the value of
their holdings fails to
                  appreciate or, worse, falls outright. With the majority of
funds operating on an
                  October 31 fiscal year end, and given a trend toward
letting investors know
                  their estimated tax hit well before year's end, much of
this selling has been
                  concentrated in a brief period of weeks.

                  One fund executive attending a Fidelity mutual-fund
conference last week
                  reported that, oddly, some managers have resolved to be
contrary and
                  "overdo it" in selling even their winners. The theory, he
reports, is that if
                  they're going to have a capital-gains distribution anyway,
the most skittish
                  shareholders will sell the fund to avoid the payout and its
tax liability, whether
                  it's, say, either 10% or 12% of net asset value. So the
idea is to take profits
                  and "reload" for the benefit of those investors who will
stick around.

                  Now, with the Nasdaq off 22.7% since Labor Day and 8% so
far in
                  October, much talk is bubbling about suggesting that the
assault is ending.
                  This line of reasoning counsels that it's time to peek out
of the foxhole and
                  survey the wreckage for some badly damaged stocks to pick
up in
                  expectation of a late-year rally.

                  Not so fast. While it's true that in past years, these
hard-hit tax-selling victims
                  tend to recover in the early part of November, the move
often proves fleeting.
                  Like a ball being held under water, these stocks jump when
the downward
                  pressure is released, but that doesn't mean they escape
gravity's pull for long.
                  Soon enough, they're hit by a secondary wave of selling by
investors who tidy
                  up their tax situation closer to the end of the year.

                  The quantitative equity research team at Lehman Brothers
has studied recent
                  market history in search of patterns in tax-driven selling.
In the process, the
                  analysts came up with a list of 131 stocks that look
vulnerable to persistent
                  weakness through most of the fourth quarter. The study
scanned the Russell
                  3000 index -- basically the 3,000 largest U.S. stocks --
for those that had
                  fallen at least 40% this year through September, and had
lost at least 10% in
                  the prior six months. They also plucked only those stocks
that had seen rising
                  trading volume over that period. The idea was to find only
those names that
                  seem to be in the throes of a selling crescendo. In 1997,
there were just eight
                  such stocks. In 1998, there were 202 and last year 101, on
a par with this
                  year's tired crop.

                  Murali Ramaswami of Lehman says, "There's both a tax-loss
story and a
                  momentum story. Losers continue to be losers." At least
through the fourth
                  quarter they do.

                                       The negative momentum of these stocks
tends to
                                       gather speed from the first week of
November to
                  Christmas. In this period, from 1997 through last year, the
Losers Portfolio
                  dropped an average of 20% more than did the Russell 3000
index.
                  Bottom-fishers, beware.

                  The resulting list, which Lehman billed to its
institutional clients as a menu for
                  hungry short-sellers, features numerous stocks caught in
the major downside
                  themes of the year. Name a major telecom-services provider
and the odds
                  are good it's in this bunch, the result of a stampede away
from the group. Big
                  retailers also dot the down-on-their-luck roster, as the
slowing economy has
                  ravaged shares of Circuit City, Dillards, Saks and others.
And of course there
                  are plenty of dot.com names experiencing the ugly side of a
mania undone, in
                  a reversal that has made some mere flyspecks on the
market's windshield.
                  Witness Barnesandnoble.com and Razorfish.

                  An intrepid prospector surveying this list in a quest for
next year's Comeback
                  Stock of the Year will encounter no shortage of companies
that appear, for
                  the moment, broken and in need of an inspired strategic
revamping, some
                  slick investor-relations work and plenty of luck. Former
blue chips such as
                  Lucent Technologies, Bausch & Lomb and Dial seem to fall
into that club,
                  where for investors a love of dirt-cheap stocks and a
strong backbone is the
                  price of admission. DuPont, which recently ratcheted down
its 2001 growth
                  forecast and is beset by high raw-materials costs, is
arguably apt to remain in
                  the investors' time-out chair for a while as well. That its
shares failed to sell off
                  after a limp earnings report last week is perhaps the most
hopeful sign one can
                  seize on with regard to the chemicals giant.

                  Still, for the investor patient enough to endure what could
be a stormy
                  November and December, a few sizable companies with
temporary problems
                  but solid long-term growth stories are attracting some fund
managers looking
                  to buy. As detailed in Barron's last week ("Retailers on
Sale," October 23),
                  there is reason to expect better performance from selected
retail chains.
                  Federated Department Stores, the parent of Macy's and
Bloomingdale's,
                  merits attention both for its buoyant same-store sales
growth in a retail
                  headwind and for its repair of the addled Fingerhut
catalogue division, which
                  suffered a spike in delinquencies. The shares are off their
trough levels in the
                  low 20s, but a recent quote of 28 still seems a
better-than-fair price for a
                  company that some pros believe could earn more than $5 a
share next year.

                  The advertising business this year is being given the cold
shoulder by investors
                  after a torrid love affair through 1999. Fearing that the
dot.com washout and
                  resultant cash drought would wither the bottom line of ad
firms, investors
                  abandoned Interpublic, the third-largest owner of ad
agencies after WPP and
                  Omnicom.

                  But Mark Greenberg, manager of the Invesco Leisure fund,
saw a chance to
                  pick up a "good, solid company" inexpensively when
Interpublic hit the low
                  30s. Now at 39, Interpublic is still fetching just 22 times
forecast 2001
                  earnings, which are expected to grow 15%, faster than
profits for the overall
                  market.

                  "I bought some early this year and added to it just
recently. The bad news is
                  probably priced into the stock, and then some," he says.

                  Madison Avenue markdown

                  Interpublic, parent of McCann Erickson, among other firms,
has always
                  suffered a bit in comparison with Omnicom, a market darling
considered the
                  class operator in the industry. But Interpublic now trades
at a discounted
                  valuation, and is briskly expanding its direct-marketing
and public-relations
                  business, which are growing faster than the traditional
Madison Avenue game.
                  Add in the fact that only a sliver of its business comes
from dot.coms and that
                  half its revenues are collected overseas, and Interpublic
appears well insulated
                  from crippling economic forces.

                  In a more prosaic corner of the ad business sits Valassis
Communications, a
                  big coupon distributor, which produces the colorful inserts
that fall out of your
                  Sunday paper. A well-loved growth stock that pleased many a
small and
                  mid-cap fund manager in 1999, Valassis this year ran into a
nettlesome
                  combination of higher paper prices and stiffer price
competition in one of its
                  insert categories. Investors bailed out in droves, halving
the stock from a high
                  above 44 to just north of 20. Now at 25, the shares are
"absurdly cheap,"
                  says Greenberg, who also owns Valassis.

                  Another fund manager points out that the company has taken
control of its
                  troubles, with hedged paper prices and a move to cut supply
in products
                  where pricing declined. Even with its growth forecast
revised downward,
                  Valassis is still expected to increase profits at a 10%-15%
long-term rate, and
                  earnings next year should rise close to 12%, to $2.50 a
share. That leaves the
                  stock at a mere 10 times next year's profits. And it's
worth noting that in times
                  of slower economic growth, coupons are among the things
that companies
                  continue to offer to bargain-hunters.

                  With a new wave of tax selling due to bear down on haggard
stocks any
                  week now, it might feel as if the typical first-quarter
rebound in the year's
                  losers that's been documented by Lehman Brothers is
hopelessly distant.

                  If you're tempted nonetheless to plunge ahead and buy a
beaten-down mutual
                  fund, check first to see if it will be among those making a
capital-gains
                  distribution later this year. In that case, you'll be on
the hook for the tax even
                  though you didn't participate in the gain. (You can take
the plunge without
                  worrying about payouts if you're buying the fund for a
tax-deferred account
                  such as a 401(k) or an IRA.)

                  But at least in selected stocks, it seems the machinations
of tax-fearing
                  investors have created the stock market equivalent of a
25%-off sale, and you
                  don't need to redeem a manufacturer's coupon to take
advantage.


Any of the following would be great (prop ref no.):

TUS-020-02 (the last one on your list)
TUS-030-01
TUS-030-06
TUS-005-02

I would prefer one with a tennis court in the complex.  Go ahead and book.
Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 02/21/2000 10:49
AM ---------------------------

Maureen McVicker
02/18/2000 03:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: Tuscany

SK - I forwarded this to you in case you want to look at the websites this
weekend.  mm

---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES on 02/18/2000
03:30 PM ---------------------------

Jane Blizzard <jane@travelpark.com> on 02/18/2000 02:34:38 PM
To: "'MMCVICKE@ENRON.COM'" <MMCVICKE@ENRON.COM>
cc:
Subject: FW: Tuscany

Maureen,

Please see if Steve likes any of these......we need to grab 1 pretty soon!

Jane Blizzard
jane@travelpark.com
713 860 1116 direct line
713 650 7022 fax
1221 Lamar Suite 718
Houston, Texas 77010

> ----------
> From:  Francesca Tosolini[SMTP:FrancescaT@rentavilla.com]
> Sent:  Friday, February 18, 2000 12:39 PM
> To:  'Jane Blizzard'
> Subject:  RE: Tuscany
>
> Hello Jane,
> As last choices I can offer the following properties:
>
> http://www.rentavilla.com/property_detail.asp?ref=IT-TUS-030-09
>
> This is an independent house at only 15 minutes driving from Siena. Note:
> it
> is booked the week of June 24th.
>
>
>
> http://www.rentavilla.com/property_detail.asp?ref=IT-TUS-011-03
>
> This is an apartment, similar in decor to Pastore, very nice pool and
> location.
>
>
>
> http://www.rentavilla.com/property_detail.asp?ref=IT-TUS-003
>
> This is a property  that I strongly suggest as it is an independent villa
> with pool, excellent for a family with children. The price is a little
> higher and the furniture are modern, but the privacy is guarantied!
>
>
>
> http://www.rentavilla.com/property_detail.asp?ref=IT-TUS-020-02
>
> This is an independent house near San Gimignano. The pool is shared with
> the
> main villa.
>
> Please, be advised that our rentals are from Saturday to Saturday (in this
> case from June 17 to July 1).
>
> Hope to hear from you soon.
>
> Francesca Tosolini
> Booking Agent
> VillaNet
> 12600 SE 38th Street, Suite 202
> Bellevue, WA 98006
> Phone: 425 653 7801
> Fax: 425 653 3866
> Email: francesca@rentavilla.com
> Website: www.rentavilla.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jane Blizzard [mailto:jane@travelpark.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 10:15 AM
> To: 'Francesca Tosolini'
> Subject: RE: Tuscany
>
>
> Emanuel has been helping me. We have new dates June 20 - July 1. Emanuel
> has
> not  found anything wonderful for me yet.........Pastore was taken the day
> before we  put in our request!
> Please help us!!!
>
> Jane Blizzard
> jane@travelpark.com
> 713 860 1116 direct line
> 713 650 7022 fax
> 1221 Lamar Suite 718
> Houston, Texas 77010
>
> >


IN CELEBRATION OF EVERYONE'S HARD WORK AND DEDICATION.

CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR PROMOTIONS!!!!!

WELCOME ALL NEW HIRES!!!!!!!

AND GOOD LUCK TO THOSE LEAVING US.


I am still here.  I have a contract through March 1 of next year, so I should be here at least until then.  The absolute destruction of the company has been pretty brutal - some of the people lost everything in their 401K.  I guess they really believed in the company.  We should still be in town in Feb. just let us know when the party is and we will be there.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Thomas N. Zaubi" <alltimeqb@hotmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 7:16 AM
To:	plove@enron.com
Subject:	Hello Philly

whats up man?

How are things with you?  Hearing all the news about Enron and all, figured
I see how you are fairing.  I really hope that your not effected by all the
bs.  We are doing well here.  Getting cold, but hey, its Norway right?  We
have starting building a house and its going well.  I figure it will take
about a year to get it all done. I would like to do as much of the work
myself, but I will see how long that goes.  Anyway, The Family and myself
will be in Houston in late Feb.  We are having a small reception in Clear
Lake and would love to see yall there if you can make it.

Let me here from you soon, hope all is well with you and the family.

Tell your moms whats up from me.

Tommy

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 01:47
PM ---------------------------

Scott Hendrickson
07/25/2000 01:37 PM
To: Julie Gomez, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Fraley,
bruce.s.grant@lmco.com, Ejmunion@aol.com
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000
01:34 PM ---------------------------

John Craig Taylor
07/25/2000 01:25 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, George N
Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles H Otto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farzad
Farhangnia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: "Aggie Virus"

<< > You have just received the "Aggie Virus"
  >
  > As we don't have any programming experience, this virus works on the
  > honor system.  Please delete all the files from your hard drive and
  > manually forward this virus to everyone on your mailing list.
  >
  > Thanks for your cooperation,
  > Texas A & M Computer Engineering Dept >>


- 1-10-2002.xls


Eric,

I think we can skip the meeting and discuss any issues between us.
The meeting was convened at the request of Doug Arnell, but Jeff
Shankman thinks that there is no need for formal meetings: we can
ask them for the information directly on as needed basis.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           09/05/2000 11:01 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wednesday meeting

are we still having the meeting tomorrow?  at what time?

thanks,

Eric


[IMAGE]
    Yo-Yo Weather Patterns     One unique feature of the United States is that it is the perfect distance across to have two extremes of weather in the wintertime.   Advertisement  Click to learn more...      The United States is roughly 3000 miles from coast to coast and by coincidence, the jet stream has an average wavelength of about 3000 miles as well. (Wavelength is the distance between the ridges and the troughs of a wave and the jet stream is really just a series of waves in the flow of air around the earth.) This means that many times during the year, the west coast will have a trough, or cold pattern and the east coast will have a ridge, or warm pattern or visa versa.    This winter has been no exception. In December, the jet stream pattern had a large trough in the west. This spread cold air and heavy snows to the areas west of the Mississippi. Many ski areas are enjoying great ski conditions and the Olympic venues in Utah are extremely happy. Back east, it was a different story. Many ski slopes in the Appalachians did not open before Christmas and did not see any snow or even make snow. In fact, some of the major cities in the east had the latest first freeze ever recorded.  As you read this, big shifts have occurred. Over the week of Christmas the jet stream amplitude reversed and the east had the trough and the ridge shifted west. This finally brought a real shot of winter to the east and happiness to the ski slope operators. Shifts like this are common and most winters have at least one such major shift in the jet stream each year. This year was no exception. What is in our future? It is likely we will see another shift or two to keep the temperatures across the country acting like a yo-yo.  The new WeatherBug 3.0 offers some great ways to follow the changing Jet Stream. Upgrade to version 3.0 so you can enjoy the all-new WinterNet, which includes worldwide ski reports, winter travel and wind chill maps. You can follow the "yo-yo" weather from your closest WeatherBug weather station as well as checking Wild Weather in the Cool Links/Resources section of your WeatherBug. Make sure you have the newest WeatherBug content by updating your Bug to version 3.0. Click here  to upgrade!   Mark Hoekzema WeatherBug Meteorologist       The WeatherNet Camera Captures Weather Imagery in Real-Time!       As pictured below, the WeatherNet Camera located at Fredda Nottingham Elementary School in Dayton, Texas caught a funnel cloud forming in late November!  The images captured by this school's WeatherNet Camera, along with the real-time weather conditions generated by the school's WeatherNet Weather Station, is a powerful educational tool for classroom learning!  Educators, students and parents enjoy viewing the changes in weather conditions at their school on the Internet, on Television and in WeatherBug!       [IMAGE]  For more information on how your school can purchase a WeatherNet Camera and join the School WeatherNet Program call your WeatherNet Team at 1-800-544-4429 or email edsales@aws.com .   Be sure to mention the January edition of Bug Bytes for savings on the WeatherNet Camera!    	   Share WeatherBug for Your Chance to Win Two Fabulous Trips!     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]        Watch your WeatherBug this month for your chances to win TWO trips-- one to the magical WALT DISNEY WORLD SWAN DOLPHIN and one to warm and sunny SCOTTSDALE!  Your "Share the WeatherBug" button will change frequently, so be sure to click on each sponsor and register to win both trips! Remember, each Bug you share equals one registration-so share WeatherBug with your family and friends-the more you share, the better your chances of winning!  For complete details, click here for Disney Contest Rules.   For complete details, click here for Scottsdale Contest Rules.         Location, location, location!     The hospitality industry, including hotels and resorts, knows just how important it is to be able to connect to their clientele on a regular basis and keep them coming back year after year.  The WeatherNet System has proven very effective for the Vanderbilt Inn located in Naples, Florida.      Executive Engineer, Blaine Daugs uses the Vanderbilt Inn's WeatherNet System to provide live, real-time weather information to guests via an internal cable system at the hotel.  The WeatherNet Camera's images and WeatherNet Weather Station's information have been added to the Vanderbilt Inn's corporate website to give travelers and guests of the Vanderbilt Inn the information they are seeking-local temperatures and live weather images!    Mr. Daugs notes that, "weather information is of interest to potential patrons visiting our website at www.vanderbiltinn.com .  They can check out a live snap shot of our WeatherNet Camera to get real-time, current conditions and also check the historical weather information from our property."  For more information on how your business can benefit from  real-time weather information, contact Gary Milwit, Director  of Commercial Sales at 1-800-544-4429 ext. 1621 or e-mail  gmilwit@aws.com .     [IMAGE]  WeatherNet Camera At Vanderbilt Inn    	   WeatherBug Tip of the Month     Did you know that you can change the color of your WeatherBug 3.0 temperature icon?  It's easy -- just click on "Options" or "Setup".  Select the "Preferences" tab.  Click on the "Customize Color" button at the bottom of that screen.  Select a color then click "OK."  Click OK again, and that's it!  You've just customized the color of your temperature icon!    Don't have this latest version of WeatherBug yet? Get your free upgrade-click here!       Survey  Says...  Complete  the survey below and be eligible to win a DVD player! Our DVD winner  last month was Ronald Brexel of Jamesburg, NJ-- congratualtions, Ronald!       Each New Year, many people take stock of their goals and prospects for the coming year. As 2002 begins for you, are you concerned about your financial future?  Please SelectYesNo  Do you have a passport?  Please SelectYesNo  Do you shop online?  Please SelectYesNo      Advertisement  [IMAGE]

To stop receiving WeatherBug Bytes, click HERE
[IMAGE]


DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec
Dereg Wed -Sources

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX),
saying the current state of
California's power markets threatens the company with
bankruptcy, will call Wednesday
for an end to California's four-year experiment with
deregulation, sources familiar with
the issue told Dow Jones Newswires.

John Bryson, chief executive of Edison International,
is expected to announce that
the company's regulated utility unit, Southern California
Edison, won't be able to
recover more than $3 billion in losses related to power
purchases and continue serving
its retail customers unless the state's deregulated market
structure is scrapped.

In a move tantamount to a call for reregulation,
Edison will propose to break ground
on new power plants within 90 days and re-enter the
power-generation business
Southern California Edison was required to exit under the
state's landmark 1996
deregulation law, the sources said.

Edison plans to follow the announcement by filing a
request with state regulators to
increase retail electricity rates by as much as 20%, the
sources said, even though
regulators rejected Edison's request for a rate increase
of 10% last week.

The utility has lined up the support of some state
lawmakers for the broader
proposal, which would require action by the state
legislature, the sources said.

Southern California Edison, with 4.2 million
customers, is one of the country's largest
electric utilities. Edison was the first of the state's
utilities to sign on to the deregulation
effort and, as it says on its Web site, "played a central
role in the restructuring of the
electric industry in California."

Among the concessions won by utilities in 1996 is the
rate freeze, which they
demanded to help them recover costs related to
deregulation but which is now
producing huge losses.

Edison's current losses stem from an imbalance
between the soaring prices it must
pay to purchase power on the wholesale markets and the
fixed rate at which it can sell
power to its customers.

About half of those losses are offset the utility's
own power sales revenues, which
are accounted for separately and used to pay down
deregulation-related debt. Rising
power costs have produced a surplus in that account.
Edison wouldn't reveal the
current size of the surplus, but said previously that the
California Power Exchange paid
the utility $1.3 billion over its generating costs for
power through the end of September,
at a time when its power-purchase losses were $2.4
billion.

Power-Purchase Losses Mounting

The net losses continue to mount. California's
wholesale power prices hovered at
record levels all summer and spiked even higher in the
past two weeks, as colder
weather arrived in the Northwest at a time when much of
California's power supply was
down for maintenance.

The price of power for delivery Wednesday in
California hit an average of $1,182 a
megawatt-hour Tuesday, up from $250 a megawatt-hour a week
ago, the result of high
demand and a decision by California's wholesale market
operator to lift its cap on prices.

The rate Southern California Edison can charge its
retail customers, however, is fixed
at $66/MWh.

Last week, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) downgraded its
ratings for Edison
International and PG&E Corp. (PCG), the parent of
California's other major utility, Pacific
Gas & Electric, to neutral, saying the utilities may be
forced to file for bankruptcy if the
state doesn't allow them to raise their retail rates.

A Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (MDW) analyst drew the
same conclusion Monday,
also cutting his rating to neutral.

Edison to this point has kept its power-purchase
losses off its earnings statement, in
hopes that a political or regulatory solution will allow
them to be collected later.

The California Public Utilities Commission put the
hope of such a solution further out
of reach last week, however, when it ruled against rate
increases sought by Edison and
PG&E.

Credit rating agency Fitch Inc. on Monday lowered its
ratings for Edison
International and Southern California Edison's senior
unsecured debt to the A-minus
level, citing "increased liquidity pressure" and
uncertainty about the utilities' ability to
recover the costs of their power purchases. The agency
downgraded Edison
International, the parent, because half its consolidated
cash flow is provided by
Southern California Edison.

Edison - which sources said plans to remain in the
retail electricity business - said
late last week that it has secured a $1 billion line of
credit and expects to have enough
cash on hand to continue to pay for wholesale electricity
for the next several months.

California paid more than $1 billion for power last
week, sources said. Some of that,
however, was paid to Southern California Edison, which
still generates about 2,800
megawatts of power in the state.

Shares in Edison International have fallen 21% over
the past three weeks. They
closed Wednesday at $18.56, down $0.06.

-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com(Mark Golden contributed
to this article.)

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:50 AM
To: William Hall; Trond Aschehoug; Tony Wetzel; Susan J Mara; Steve Ponder;
Steve Iliff; Scott Noll; Roger Pelote; Rob Lamkin; Randy Hickok; Paula Soos;
Marty McFadden; Lynn Lednicky; Kent Fickett; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall;
Joe Ronan; Joe Greco; Jim Willey; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg
Blue; Frank DeRosa; Eric Eisenman; Eileen Koch; Ed Tomeo; Duane Nelsen; Dean
Gosselin; Dave Parquet; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn
Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill Woods; Bill Carlson; Kate Castillo; Pigott Jack;
Tom Ross; Sue Mara; Stephanie-Newell; Richard Hyde; Paula Hall-Collins;
Norton Kelli; McNally Ray; Marty Wilson; Kristin Vellandi; kent Palmerton;
Katie Kaplan; Kassandra Gough; Karen Edson; Julee Malinowski-Ball; John
Stout; Jeff Dasovich; Jean Munoz; Jan Smutny-Jones; Bob Weisenmiller; B
Brown Andy; Andy Brown; Douglas Kerner
Cc: Douglas Kerner; Julee Malinowski-Ball; Karen Edson; Andy Brown; B Brown
Andy
Subject: FYI-Edison wants back in the generation business

Edison Mission Energy Power Project Starts Construction After Expedited
Approval By California Energy Commission

Monday December 11 6:39pm
Source: Dow Jones

Operation Targeted for August

IRVINE, Calif., Dec. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Edison Mission Energy (EME), an
Edison International company (NYSE: EIX), started construction of its new
Sunrise power plant on Thursday, December 7, having received expedited
approval from the California Energy Commission (CEC) to proceed. The
power generation facility will be located in Kern County, California, and
will bring both short- and long-term generation capacity to the state, which
is in
dire need of new power generation.

"From the onset of the California power crisis, we have sought to find
means to bring new power to the California market," said John E. Bryson,
chairman and CEO of Edison International. "This CEC approval will help
ensure that this critical new project will be able to provide a significant
amount
of new peaking power to the state as soon as next August. Our thanks and
appreciation go to the California Energy Commission, and the
environmental and regulatory agencies for their swift consideration of this
important project."

"This power has been offered by contract to the state so that the pricing
for it does not depend on California's broken deregulated power market,"
said
Alan J. Fohrer, president and CEO of EME. "Alternatively, EME will seek to
enter into a long-term, cost-based contract with either Pacific Gas &
Electric Company or San Diego Gas & Electric Company to further ensure that
California's consumers reap the benefit of this additional power
resource," Fohrer said.

The Sunrise Power Project will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 will
consist of a 320-megawatt (MW), simple-cycle peaking facility scheduled to
be in service during the summer 2001. Phase 2 will convert the peaking
facility to a 560-MW, combined-cycle operation with an in-service date of
summer 2003. The project will meet or exceed all pertinent environmental
and safety standards.

Final regulatory approvals have been received for Phase I of the project
only.

EME will be seeking expedited permitting approval for the Phase II
expansion in line with the fast-track approval process recently enacted by
the
California legislature.

EME has also negotiated an agreement with the labor unions for an adequate
supply of highly skilled labor in order to achieve an accelerated
construction schedule. The accelerated schedule is aimed at providing this
additional power to California by next summer.

Edison Mission Energy specializes in the development, acquisition,
construction management and operation of global power production facilities.
As
one of the world's leading global power producers, Edison Mission Energy
owns nearly 23,000 megawatts of generating capacity, including interests in
75 projects currently under construction or operating in Australia,
Indonesia, Italy, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the
United
Kingdom and the United States.

Based in Rosemead, Calif., Edison International is a premier international
electric power generator, distributor and structured finance provider. With
a
portfolio of approximately 28,000 megawatts, Edison International is an
industry leader in privatized, deregulated and incentive-regulated markets
and
power generation. It is the parent company of Edison Mission Energy,
Southern California Edison, Edison Capita, Edison Enterprises and Edison
O&M Services.

/CONTACT: Kevin Kelley of Edison Mission Energy, 626-302-1033, Fax,
626-302-7827/ 21:35 EST

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


As a reminder, the mandatory Annual Compliance Meeting was rescheduled to Thursday, November 8, 2001 from 8:30 - 10:00 am at the Doubletree Hotel, LaSalle Room B.  The agenda is as follows:

		Robert George			Board Seats
		Richard Lauer			ECT Securities LP
		Cassandra Schultz		Risk Management Policy
		Bob Bruce			Chinese Wall Policy
		Chip Schneider			Transaction Approval Process
		Rick Carson			RAC Reporting Tools

Please confirm your attendance at this year's meeting either by responding to this email message or contacting Donna Wackerle at ext. 39755.  If you have already RSVP'd, thank you and we will see you Thursday.   If you have any questions, please contact me directly at ext. 31939.  I look forward to seeing you this year.

PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO ENSURE IT IS SCHEDULED ON YOUR CALENDAR.

Donna Lowry
Sr. Director
RAC Compliance
(713) 853-1939
(713) 646-4039 fax


I attended Cmmr. Wood's two-day hearing on Wholesale Markets, which concluded
today (8/24) in San Diego.  Three Commissioner's were present (Wood, Lynch
and Neeper) with Duque and Bilas participating by phone.  Administrative Law
Judge Wetzel was present and a transcript was taken.  The quasi-legislative
hearing was the beginning of a record developed for the investigation into
the workings of wholesale/retail markets.  This session focused on Wholesale
markets.  There will be subsequent sessions on retail issues, market
structure and other related issues in the future.  My conclusion from this
session is that Wood is looking for support for increasing regulatory
intervention in the market.

Dan Larcamp, Director of the Office of markets, Tariffs and Rates, FERC, was
present.  He relayed FERC's concern of this matter and a desire to hold
hearings in San Diego.  He also relayed that Hoecker held a press conference
announcing the opening of a 206 investigative proceeding into the operation
of the wholesale markets in California, which carried with it refund
authority.

The format of the hearing was to respond to pre-filed questions developed by
Wood/Lynch.  Each member of the panel would respond to the questions and any
questions posed by the Commissioners, the Judge or the CPUC Attorney.  No
questions were posed by members of the audience.  Yesterday's panel of
academics were comprised of:

1.  Dr. Timothy Duane-UC Berkley
2.  Dr. William Hogan-Harvard
3.  Dr. Frank Wolak-Stanford (ISO Market Surveillance Committee)
4.  David Marcus-Energy Consultant for the Coaltion of Utility Employees
5.  Dr. Gene Coyle
6.  Dr. Jean-Michel Glachant, Universite Paris I Pantheon Sorbonne

The panel was asked to speak as individuals and not on behalf of any
institutions they may represent.  While the purpose of the panel seemed to be
to determine that market power was being exercised and that prices were too
high and therefore not just and reasonable, the panelist stopped short of
blaming generators and market participants in behaving illegally.  The
concensus generally was that market power did exist at various times, but the
mere existence did not constitute bad behavior.  None, with the exception of
Dr. Wolak who is in the process of doing a study using recent data as part of
his role for the Market Surveillance Committee, had done a study.  There was
some discussion, though not much, of the monopsony power of the utilities.  I
think ultimately the group conceded that scarcity of supply amplified
concerns about the exercise of market power, as even the increase in gas
costs did not fully explain the recent spikes.  Wolak believes that encourage
utilities to enter into forward purchases will reduce the exercise of
real-time market power.

Hogan seemed to be there with Sempra's interests in mind.  He continued to
promote expansion of the ISO's abilities to dispatch load as well as maintain
system reliability.  There was alot of discussion about forward purchase
ability for utilities so as to be less subject to volatile market prices.
The concerns were also discussed about the appropriateness of a distribution
utility making purchasing decisions on behalf of its customers.  This
included discussion of separation of these functions and the default provider
role.

Most everyone agreed that rolling back to a regulated market was not feasible
without raising other major and serious concerns, however there seemed to be
support for some interim measures where cost-of-service regulation may be a
good idea and that was during peak periods.  All agreed that a demand
response, and price signals, are important in the long-run, although not to
the extent currently experienced in San Diego.

Today's panel included representatives from SDG&E, SCE and PG&E, TURN, UCAN
and ORA.

While yesterday's panel maintained objectivity as to whether or not
generators were exercising market power to the detriment of the system,
today's panel made no bones about the generators being to blame.

SCE/PG&E indicated their need for relief for recovery of market costs in
excess of the rate freeze.  SDG&E was still on the hot seat for their
inaction in hedging any of their supply.  SDG&E brought up their failed PBR
proposal and ORA and UCAN thought that that may be one way to incent the
utility to be more responsible with their purchases.

UCAN discussed the Governor's direction and the potential for putting rate
caps into affect for residential and small commercial.  He mentioned that C&I
customers are experience difficulties as well.

TURN raised the need for cost-based bid caps and cost-based peaking
contracts.  Mike Florio, TURN, urged against any further divestitute of
assets and alleged market concentration on those assets that had been
divested.  In fact, TURN urged the Commission to seek legislation to clarify
the Commission's authority to order retention of assets.

Neeper urged that part of the solution should be changing the current
requirement to use the PX as the only authorized exchange, although TURN
disagreed.

Bruno Gaillard
08/24/2000 06:09 PM
To: SF Directors, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES,
Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary Hain@Enron, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Daily Update/ Legislative activity - 08/24/00

Siting related bills

1. Good new - The Williamson Act passed the Senate 34-1, It should be heard
at the assembly Saturday or Monday if it is not redirected to a Committee
hearing.

2. There was a long meeting with Ducheny with regards to AB 970. The enviro's
boycotted, they want to draft a bill with Keeley. Labor was obstructionist -
they wanted to gut all the expediting siting  language with regards to all
facilities except for the peaking plants.

Rate Cap related bills
1. The Edison Language on Rate Stabilization may not go anywhere. Edison has
not found an author because of the efforts of Enron and others lobbying
against it. Furthermore there are signs that Gov. Davis opposes it.

2. The Governor's office has issued a proposed language for a rate cap bill.
The language however is not available as of yet. It may be released today or
tomorrow. SDG&E has shown concerns over the content of the bill. They seem to
think that it is worse than initially proposed by the Governor in his press
release.
The bill includes retroactive rate caps through 6/1/00.
The rate cap could reflect Wood's rate cap proposal (6.5 cts cap on the
energy component
The bill does not specify who or how the costs associated with the cap will
be recovered. (The reasoning is that UDCs will be more cautious in their
procurement if there is uncertainty on who is responsible for the costs.)
All of this is speculative. We hope to see the actual language soon.

3. Enron has been working with the Republican leadership to promote a rate
cap proposal similar to the amended language we have proposed for AB2290.
The bill focuses only on SDG&E customers and our major principals are the
following.
The Interim Rate Cap should be limited to residential and small commercial
customers, plus specific institutions that have a significant public role,
such as schools and hospitals.
The Interim Rate Cap should be limited to the period ending December 31, 2001.
The Interim Rate Cap must be structured so that any undercollection is
eventually recovered from the same customers who benefit from the lower rates
provided by the rate cap.


Jeff:

Although the contract with Adventis has been terminated by D.Cox via telephone, Partha Ghosh continues to try to facilitate the AT&T - Enron relationship.

I continue to believe that there is no reason that you can not have a direct relationship with Dave Dorman to pursue opportunities at a high level.  I have always encouraged a direct call from you to D.Dorman to find out if we can wean ourselves from Adventis.

I understand that you have a call scheduled today with D.Dorman I would like to take the opportunity to get a gut check on the previous deal if you think it is appropriate.

Talking Points:

Previous Deals Proposed

We previously proposed a transaction to establish a JV which would pursue the wholesale intermediation market for long haul bandwidth (see attached draft).

You seemed interested in our proposal but we have had difficulty in getting a follow up meeting to confirm your interest and get your thoughts on the proposal.

In the meantime, through Adventis, we proposed a different structure where AT&T would buy Enron's longhaul network and in exchange Enron would take back a take or pay (see attached draft).  In our view, it's really the same deal but instead of AT&T receiving value through an equity interest in a JV, AT&T would receive value through the take of pay.  The deal really accomplishes the same thing for us.

The Strategy Behind the Deals Proposed

EBS is really an acquisition for Enron that came with the purchase of Portland General Electric.  The communications company of PGE was going down the road of all of the other fiber over builders in the marketplace in that it intended to build out its own network.

We have repositioning that company over the last 12 - 18 months so that it fits better with the Enron business model of trading and intermediation.  Part of this process likely includes reducing of most of out long haul positions to better facilitate intermediating the long haul market as opposed to  build, own and operate in it. The deals proposed to AT&T would assist accomplish this repositioning of EBS.

Future Communications

Previously we have spent much of our time communicating to you through Adventis.  This has been a challenging process for us.  Is it possible to establish a direct high level relationship with AT&T especially at the President (D.Dorman) to CEO (J.Skilling) level.


ST-CALI is short 50 mws in NP-15 on Monday on peak.  Please buy for ST-CALI
(under their book) and sell to the California Imbalance for them.  They are
short at $340.
Thanks,
Bill


Attached please find the memo I promised related to next steps.  Let me know.

JDS


Dear Ken:
Although Harmolyn and I have wanted to pass on some words of friendship for some time, we did not want to intrude for even a moment as you worked to deal with your problems.
We could not, however, let the holiday season past without saying that you know where we are and how to reach us. And I think you know that we are fully ready to help in any way we can in the weeks and months ahead.
You will be interested in knowing that Brudder Pete called me on my 78th (Christmas eve) and he sounded twenty years younger than when I saw him in September.
                                                        Charly


No problme.  I enjoy helping out.  Just tell them to send you $2000.  You
should have at least that in cash.  If there is any extra leftover and you
need the cash, you might as well take it too but that's up to you.  Enron is
up a bunch again today so you should do well selling today.  Love,  Charlie

Margaret Jones <mjones@gc.edu> on 01/24/2001 09:24:02 AM
To: V.Charles.Weldon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Hi

Charlie, I got your pictures - thank you - they were neat and I am
looking forward to the rest of them.  I am anxious to hear about your
trip but I know that you are probably still trying to recuperate from
your trip so call me when you feel rested.  I have class tonight and
will leave about 3:00 and won't get home until 11:00 so obviously
tonight won't be good.  When I call to sell my Merck and 5 shares of
Enron will they send me a check?  I can't remember how it works.  Once
again I want to thank you for watching out for me and my family with
these investments - I know it is time consuming but very much
appreciated.  God Bless You!  Love, Margaret


thanks.  It amazes me how many people saw C-span ... I thought it was just
for junkies like us.  I would like to get together in DC.  I don't have a
date scheduled yet, but I seem to get there every other week or so.

	Jim Schultz <jschultz@steel.org>
	02/05/2001 07:08 AM

		 To: "Steve Kean (E-mail)" <skean@enron.com>
		 cc: Jim Schultz <jschultz@steel.org>
		 Subject: Senate Energy Hearing

Steve,

Caught your performance on C span over the weekend by accident covering the
Senate hearings last Wednesday. You did a great job. I think Sen Murkowski
gets it, but many of the others clearly do not.

I know it's a little late but wanted to thank you for your informative
comments at our Senior managers meeting last November in California. This
energy situation really has our CEO's attention and we are considering the
formation of a new industrial users coalition to promote sound comprehensive
energy policy. Just users.

If you're in Washington and have some spare time, which neither of us ever
do, it would be great to have a lunch or something. As you know, we are
active on the hill and at FERC and DOE. On most issues, I am sure our
positions are the same.

Again, thank for your help with our Senior management. Hope to see you again
sometime.

Jim Schultz
American Iron & Steel Institute
202-452-7180, 202-463-6573F
jschultz@steel.org


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041002.txt


The report named: Violation/Notification Memo <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=60&report_name=Violation/Notification+Memo&category_cd=2&category_name=ENRON%20CONSOLIDATED&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/09/2001>, published as of 11/09/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

PRELIMINARY


I mentioned to Stan and Rod that we go forward with this.  I agree, cash is cash.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mckean, George
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Howard, Kevin A.
Subject: Re: FW: Northern Border Partners Common Units

No update yet

We expect to hear something on tues in regard to the extension of 2 weeks but will probably not know about the final fix until the 2nd week of dec

Why would we not sell the units even if the proceeds are trapped in rawhide as it would allow us to pay down debt ?

I agree that we do not want to announce anything publically until we understand where we are as it could hurt our bargaining position
George Mckean


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           03/23/2000 10:54 AM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@halliburton.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com, mcastillo@metromkt.com, Yolanda
Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: God Bless You!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

Cassandra S Dutton
03/23/2000 10:47 AM
To: iharrison@tmh.tmc.edu, vevans@tmh.tmc.edu, twest@tmh.tmc.edu, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Speer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Shoup/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerri Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Adels/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgia
Fogo/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaun
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: God Bless You!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Chaun Roberts                           03/21/2000 07:45 AM

To: Juanita Pauldon/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cassandra S Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: God Bless You!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Chaun Roberts/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 07:44
AM ---------------------------

Teri Luddington <TLuddington@selfcare.com> on 03/20/2000 06:26:09 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:  (bcc: Chaun Roberts/HOU/ECT)
Subject: God Bless You!!

 <<ATT00056.htm>>

 C:\TEMP\ATT00056.htm

 - ATT00056.htm


Connie Strebe
3245 47th Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55406
cstrebe@bitstream.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Connie Strebe


I've been out of town, and have back-to-back meetings/conference calls.  I'll
call you though.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/20/2000 12:55 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

You weren't kidding -- no lunch today?


Dana,
This is for you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Llodra, John
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Meyn, Jim; Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Dana; May, Tom; Will, Lloyd
Cc: Duran, W. David
Subject: RE: Full Requirements - Due Dilligence Items

I added a few comments in attached

-----Original Message-----
From: Meyn, Jim
Sent: Fri 10/26/2001 10:41 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Dana; May, Tom; Llodra, John; Will, Lloyd
Cc: Duran, W. David
Subject: Full Requirements - Due Dilligence Items

I've been asked to pull together a "road-map" of the list of due dilligence items that need to be vetted on full requirements deals for Origination's off-site meeting next week.  I have drafted an initial list, attached below, but would appreciate any feedback you can offer on additional items or detail.  Thanks

- Jim

<<full requirements road map.doc>>


Start Date: 3/7/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030706.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the
FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  11.00 / Final:  18.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/7/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  70.20 / Final:  54.52)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/7/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  68.16 / Final:  52.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/7/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   4.90 / Final:   2.90)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/7/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  44.89 / Final:  22.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/7/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 03:21 PM -----

	carrd2@tdcibg.com
	09/28/2000 01:04 PM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com, Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Prepay

Alberta law is OK.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Carr/CIBG/TDBANK on 09/28/2000 02:08
PM
---------------------------

Dan Carr
09/28/2000 01:48 PM

To:   Tana.Jones@enron.com, Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Prepay

Attached please find the revised draft Schedule.

(See attached file: Enroncan.doc)

Regards,
Dan Carr

 - Enroncan.doc


Please add Mark Taylor to this training.  He has put it on his calendar.

	Lola Willis@ENRON
	11/07/2000 02:48 PM

		 To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Profiles Mgr - Testing & Demo

 Your presence is requested at a  training session of Profiles Mgr. Testing &
Demo.

Date                                        10/11/00

Time                                         3:30-5:30

Location                                  EB 564

Thanks
Lola


Holli:

We need to talk about status.
I spoke yesterday with three EWEB lawyers and Dick Varner.
I have to comment back on the Schedule to the master agreement.  EWEB has not
yet reviewed the Credit Support Annex and needs to submit their proposed
legal opinion.  EWEB is reserving discussion of the confirmations pending
resolution of the master agreement.

Most important, however, is the EWEB legal opinion which will be limited by
the capacity of EWEB's traders to enter into financial trades at any given
point in time.  EWEB is insisting that we assume the obligation of knowing
whether an EWEB trader is authorized to act and how that EWEB trader is
authorized to act under EWEB's trading policy because, under Oregon law (and
the law of all states), financial trades executed by unauthorized persons
(employed by governmental entities) are completely void.

Your two trades (which began as physical deals and were transformed into
financial deals) were authorized by EWEB's recent board resolution.  However,
you cannot rely fully on this resolution for future trades.  Before you ever
trade with EWEB again, you will not be able to rely upon your past
relationship with an EWEB trader.  You will first have to conduct some due
diligence with respect to the EWEB trader and the EWEB trading policy.

ENA has never agreed to this type of arrangement.

Let's schedule a time to discuss the agreement further.  Thanks.  Sara


10:00 - Overview/Causey, 10:15 - Kean, 11:00 - Buy, 11:15 - Fastow, 11:30 - Derrick/Walls, 11:45 - Koenig, 12:00 - Lemmons, 12:15 - Causey


Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030809.txt


We have received the executed Confidentiality Agreement with the referenced
Counterparty dated May 12, 2000.  Copies will be sent to Dave Samuels and
Teresa Smith.


Big board has $4.368


The "Attack on America" on September 11th and subsequent developments have necessitated a quantum shift in Safety and Security in the Electric Power Industry.  The treat and scope of malicious and purposeful sabotage today is much greater than that of natural disasters. The Center for Business Intelligence has developed the "Safety and Security in the Electric Power Industry" conference.  Power industry executives will examine the impact of heightened security measures on their companies' day-to-day operations.  Crucial factors that will be discussed include strengthening data security and protecting against cybercrime, planning and creating inherently resilient infrastructures and assisting policymakers in developing adequate legislation to safeguard the nation's energy supply and distribution.
 CBI's Safety and Security in the Electric Power Industry  March 25-26, 2002 * Renaissance Houston Hotel * Houston, TX

www.cbinet.com/events/PB231/index.html
  Request a Brochure                                     Register Now                                     Download PDF
 Register by February 1st and SAVE $300!  Please mention your priority code PB231EM.
 This conference will give senior executives throughout the electric power industry the chance to educate and inform themselves on these topics of national importance.
A Faculty of international experts in the field of energy risk management and security will share their on-depth knowledge and experience with conference attendees.
 *****************Special Keynote Address***************** Ongoing Legislation to Protect the Electric Power Industry Representative Jeff Morris, Washington State Legislature and Chair of the House Telecommunications, Technology and Energy Committee

Benefit from the Experience of Top Security Experts:
Associated Corporate Consultants, Inc. * Blackburn Group * Deloitte & Touche LLP * Dynegy * Electric Power Research Institute * EnergyOnline * FBI * Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz * J.P. Morgan * LCG Consulting * National Association of Regulated Utility Commissioners * National Regulatory Research Institute * PEPCO * Powerscourt Ltd. * Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation * Sanctum * Scalingi Group * Stone & Webster * UtiliCorp United, Inc. * San Diego Gas & Electric * Exelon Nuclear

Attend CBI's Safety and Security in the Electric Power Industry conference on March 25-26, 2002 and arm yourself with the means to:

Confronting Financial Risks- Develop technology and training to address acute vulnerabilities
Financial Investment in Security Policies- Its impact on different transmission business models
Intelligent, Self-Healing Infrastructure- Minimize threats to the power system
Plan for Worst Case Scenarios- Conduct network vulnerability analyses
Protect Your Critical Data and Systems for Cyberterrorism- Ensure you are "Always-On"
Reinsurance for Terrorism- Latest U.S. federal government programs and assistance
Response and Reconstitution- Plans for Power Networks- Understand the importance of interdependencies between market participants

Hear about the Security Measures that Industry Leaders are Adopting:

UtiliCorp-  Best practice in corporate security risk management in a full-service energy company
PEPCO- Latest developments in physical security practices at a major urban utility
Federal- Bureau of Investigation- energy industry impacts of Houston's National Infrastructure Protection Center

Also! Choose From 2 Pre-Conference Workshopson Monday, March 25, 2002:
Workshop A-  Electronic System and Data Protection Measures for Power Companies
Workshop B- Anticipate The Worst Case Scenario- Prevent and Prepare for Potential Terrorist Attacks on Utilities
If you are interested in sponsorship & exhibit opportunities, please contact Ron Moreau by phone 781-939-2419; by fax 781-939-2495; or E-mail r.moreau@cbinet.com
For more information or to register, please call 800-817-8601, by fax at 781-939-2495; visit us online , or email cbireg@cbinet.com

If you received this e-mail in error or would like to be removed,  PLEASE CLICK HERE
0000639675


I echatted with Dan.  He said the number is 212-398-6300 and HE THINKS the name of the person is Allen Fuchs.


Sara,

Per Jean,

We may have a good argument for saying there is a material ommission from the
confirmation, because there was not a defined reference obligation.
However, that option involves going to court and is not really all that
desirable.  Basically, the whole confirm is so vague, that there's almost no
way to tell what Paul traded.  Madhur also called Lou Jaffe at DB to feel him
out on the trade.  Initially Lou was referring to the April 2002 issue of
APP, but then when he started reviewing the confirmation  and realized that a
reference entity was not specified, he started saying that DB had bought
protection on any APP issue.  I get the feeling that Madhur feels like DB
will ultimately work with us on what they deliver to us, since everyone
initially agreed that the trade was on the 4/02 issue, it just wasn't
documented that way.  Of course, the more vague the confirm, the better for
DB in this case.   (Perhaps if we had had a deal ticket, we wouldhave known
what to look for.!)   At any rate, Madhur is monitoring the trade with Jeff
for Paul (who is in Vegas), and he is keeping us in the loop.  You may want
to call Madhur direct, just to get his impressions of the conversation with
Jean.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
12:06 PM ---------------------------

Sevil Yaman@ENRON
11/10/2000 01:10 PM
To: George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: final version of the presentation

george,

here is the presentation. I wasn't able to add a table showing the
distribution of bids by fuel type for April 2000 since the database is not
updated. Also, in the map I didn't make those minor changes. Because when I
try to erase those names, the map looks ugly. when i get back from california
let's get together and discuss the feedbacks from traders.

sevil,


FYI.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/17/2001 01:24 PM -----

	Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/17/2001 01:21 PM

		 To: Jessica Presas/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: FW: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001

can you get leslie included in this conference call for thurs a.m.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Re: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001

Sounds good.  You can reach me at 415.782.7822.  Because my schedule is a
mess (thanks to the mess California has created), if you don't reach me on my
office line, please try 415.505.6633.  Also, I think that it would be very
useful to have Leslie Lawner on, since she's involved a lot in California gas
matters, but it's your call.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

	Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate 07/17/2001 08:30 AM 	   To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Jane M
Tholt/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Jessica
Presas/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001

Jeff, for the meeting on Thurs a.m.  9:30 ( Houston Time ), we should keep
our group to the list I have identified. I would like to start with a simple
plan and work out from there. We are working towards an action plan for
handling PUC issues ( from a commercial perspective) in california and other
states, prior to anybody addressing the PUC we need agreement as to what it
is we want to put forward.

We will call you on thurs a.m.  Can you please verify your contact phone
number.

Thanks in advance.

Jessica, pls reserve a room.

BT


Hey Guys.

We have a new strategy taking power from the south to the north. Right now
Sierra Pacific will only let us schedule 12MW on the tie so do not try to
schedule any more (The tie is only good for 17MW).

- Either do a export from SP15 to Silverpeak or put in a wheel going out at
Silverpeak(From PV or FC).
- Buy transmission from SPP from  (www.swoasis.com ) CONTROL TO HILLTOP.
($6.90 on-peak, $3.90 off-peak)
- Buy transmission from PAC from MAL2 TO MAL5. ($5.84)
- Buy transmission from BPA from HILLTOP TO SNOHO or another Sink. (Account
numbers below).

We need to bounce this of SNOHO before we send it back in at Malin.

THIS SCHEDULE NEEDS TO BE TAGGED OR SIERRA PACIFIC GETS VERY PISSED OFF, THEY
ARE NOT USED TO DOING TO MUCH REAL TIME. THERE IS A TEMPLATE FOR THIS
SCHEDULE SO IT SHOULD NOT BE HARD. Call and confirm the request with both PAC
and Sierra.

Also do not sell to a marketer(especially POWEREX) without sleeving. We do
not want anybody else to know about the path. If Powerex sees this I
guarantee that they would try to schedule this and we do not want
competition. Right now the only person using the tie is SOCAL EDISON and they
are flowing 12MW into Cali, going the opposite way of us way.

It is available 24hrs a day so lets take advantage of it as much as we can.
If you have any questions over the weekend call me.

Account numbers:
SPP - PAC: 853724
SPP-SNOHO: 853703
SPP-PUGET: 853725

Geir


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Bailey, Donna" <dbailey@balch.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bailey+2C+20Donna+22+20+3Cdbailey+40balch+2Ecom+3E+40ENR
ON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Demoes, Phil; dan.hyvl@enron.com
Cc: Alan M. Kilpatrick
Subject: FORM: BILATERAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

 <<FFG901_.doc>>
Per the request of Alan Kilpatrick, I am forwarding to you Southern's
comments on your proposed confidentiality agreement.  As you can see,
they are almost entirely editorial and relate to the inclusion of
seemingly duplicative provisions.  The one substantive point is that we
do not agree to venue provisions, although we will agree in this case to
Texas choice of law.

Please let us know if these changes are acceptable in advance of the
Thursday meeting.
 - FFG901_.doc


I extended deal 583232 to cover 2/1 and #604056 to cover 2/6.

d

Aimee Lannou   02/26/2001 02:53 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: metter 1558

Daren - meter 1558 has flow and no nom for day 1 and day 6.  HPL is currently
out there starting on day 7, deal # 604056.  Could you add these days to the
deal or let me know what you do.

AL


Dear Wager List visitor:

Sports Interaction  Sportsbook is making you a special signup bonus
offer. Don't bet on a college or NFL football game this weekend before
you check it out.!

Get the details now,  click on the link below:

http://www.sportslynxnet.com/promos/si120801.htm

AOL USERS: Click here for details on Sports Interaction's offer to you


Maybe you guys were, but I wasn't aware that DWR was doing this.  Thus, the
IOU default on the ISO grows.
Sue

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 11:11 AM -----

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	02/08/2001 11:05 AM

		 To: <acomnes@enron.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: DJ Calif/Power Purchases -2: DWR Ducking Its Duty -Reliant

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Thu, 08 Feb
2001 09:19:53 -0600 -----
To:	"Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	DJ Calif/Power Purchases -2: DWR Ducking Its Duty -Reliant
FYI - Testimony at the court hearing yesterday revealed that the DWR is
making the California ISO cover the difference between the real-time power
DWR finds appropriately priced and what the state needs to buy to prevent
blackouts.  The purchases by the ISO will then be billed to the state's three
IOUs, two of which are not paying their bills.

DJ Calif/Power Purchases -2: DWR Ducking Its Duty -Reliant
Copyright , 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

The issue came up in hearings on a lawsuit filed by the California
Independent System Operator, which runs the state's transmission grid,
against Reliant Energy (REI), which wants to be allowed not to sell power to
California if the state won't guarantee that it will be paid.

     Reliant is concerned that it won't be paid for power being bought by the
ISO on the utilities' - rather than the DWR's - behalf.

     "We're willing to sell to the DWR, but they're not willing to step up to
the plate," said Terry Houlihan, an attorney with Reliant. "The DWR has money
for short- and long-term power purchases. It can avoid the situation if it
does what the state Legislature said. Then there would be no need for a
restraining order."

     The court issued a restraining order Tuesday night requiring Reliant to
sell power to California Wednesday, then extended the order for another day
Wednesday night.

     The rapidly deteriorating creditworthiness of PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Edison International (EIX) unit Southern
California Edison first left generators unwilling to supply power to
California in mid-December, when the U.S. Department of Energy intervened
with an emergency order requiring suppliers to deliver spare power to
California on demand.

     That order was extended several times, but expired Wednesday.

     Last week, the California state Legislature moved to secure the state's
power supplies by passing a bill authorizing the DWR to enter into contracts
to buy power and to finance those purchases by selling billions of dollars in
bonds.

     The idea was to shift power purchases to a buyer with better credit than
the utilities. While the bill didn't make the department responsible for
covering the state's power needs, the clear message from the governor, the
Legislature and the DWR was that the department would secure the power the
utilities couldn't buy on their own.

     That apparent mission might have been altered in the face of the state's
own mounting power bills, Maviglio said. The DWR has spent $40 million to $50
million a day buying power and has consumed around $750 million since it took
over the job in earnest on Jan. 17.

     According to testimony at Wednesday's hearing, the DWR has left it to
the California ISO to cover the difference between the real-time, or
emergency, electricity it finds appropriately priced and what the state needs
to buy to keep the lights on.

     The ISO, in turn, has been billing the state's three investor-owned
utilities for power it buys to cover the needs of their customers.

     "In emergency dispatches, the DWR has not agreed to pay a certain
price," said Jim Detmers, and operations officer at the California ISO. "If
the DWR does not agree that it will pay a certain price, then it will not
procure that power. The ISO will be forced to procure it. Then the ISO will
bill the utility wherever the power is needed."

     The utilities have together defaulted on hundreds of millions of dollars
in debt service obligations and power bills, and have said they would already
have run out of cash had they paid their bills on time.

     The volume of power left over by the DWR wasn't known.

     A spokesman for Southern California Edison said that, to date, the
utility is unaware that it's being billed for ongoing power purchases.
Pacific Gas & Electric wasn't available for comment.

     The ISO normally bills for power up to 60 days after it's delivered.

     The California Electricity Oversight Board, which oversees the
operations of the ISO, dismissed the generators' concerns, saying they were
threatening to withhold supply to gain leverage to force the DWR to sign
long-term contracts at high prices.

     The ISO, however, indicated that credit concerns remain an issue.

     "The credit issue is an ongoing problem," Detmers said. "Some generators
have indicated they would not supply California, because they are not being
paid."

     Steve Fleishman, an analyst at Merrill Lynch, said California needs to
take steps to alleviate those concerns.

     "In the end, there has to be a creditworthy party and someone who is
willing to pay to backstop this situation," Fleishman said.

     Said Reliant President and Chief Operating Officer Joe Bob Perkins in
letter to Gov. Davis Tuesday night, "Unless an immediate change in direction
occurs, the California ISO and the Department of Water Resources have set the
stage today for a return to credit-driven blackouts in California."

     The ISO argues that Reliant has contractual obligations to continue
supplying power to California.

     -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 310-666-9986;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com(Andrew Dowell in New York contributed to
this article.)

     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 08-02-01


Please print the attachment.  Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walls Jr., Rob
Sent:	Monday, April 16, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	FW: Termination Roadmap

Jim -

Although this is a first draft, it will give you some indication of the relative strengths and weaknesses of our legal claims for termination as they exist today.  This is something you should read.

Thanks.

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Fuji, Hiroko" <hiroko.fuji@linklaters.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Fuji+2C+20Hiroko+22+20+3Chiroko+2Efuji+40linklaters+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, April 13, 2001 6:40 AM
To:	Lundstrom, Bruce; lbrasher@skadden.com; Katwala, Sandeep; Walker, Christopher; Walls Jr., Rob; Kraske, Paul; Mathis, Robert; Brownfeld, Gail; Chin, Julia H.; Jose.ibieta@gecapital.com; bgordon@ben.bechtel.com; rlnelson@thelenreid.com
Cc:	Salt, Stuart; Gewirtz, Jeremy
Subject:	Termination Roadmap

Please find attached a first draft of the "Termination Roadmap" memo setting
out the various options for DPC in relation to the commencement of the
termination process and the choices it faces having initiated the process.
I am circulating this as a preliminary draft to lawyers only in the first
instance, in the knowledge that it probably needs to be refined (and
abbreviated) before it goes to wider circulation.
Please note also that it has been prepared without the benefit of having
seen the Godbole Committee Report (now out and on sale on the streets of
Bombay).
From a commercial point of view, of immediate interest is the analysis in
relation ot the decision on whether or not to complete the construction of
Phase II and whether or not to continue operation of the plant. On both
counts we identify significant risks to DPC of ceasing construction /
operation and we really should consider the overall termination strategy in
the round before decisions on this front are taken, however obvious the
answers may seem to be from a purely financial point of view.
The note is limited to the process under the PPA and coes not consider, for
instance, the influence of Lenders on the process or the role of the LNG
suppliers. It also ignores MetGas. I am happy to expand the note to cover
these aspects, and certainly in relation to the Lenders' position would need
and welcome Lance's collaboration.
Finally, I am also sure that changes will be necessary to take on board the
views of Gail and Christopher in relation to how the arbitration proceedings
would progress in parallel with the termination process. Part of what I have
written is based on discussions with Chris, but he has not yet had an
opportunity to look through the note itself having been preoccupied with
getting Notices of Arbitration out, and I would expect further changes once
he has had an opportunity to do so.
regards,
Jonathan
Jonathan Inman
Partner
Linklaters, Tokyo
a member firm of Linklaters & Alliance
Telephone: +813 3568 3801
Group 3 fax: +813 3568 3888
Group 4 fax: +813 3568 3444
jonathan.inman@linklaters.com
<http://www.linklaters.com/>
<http://www.linklaters-alliance.com/>
 <<010413_Termination Options.doc>>
Hiro Fuji
Linklaters, Tokyo
Phone +81 3 3568 3854 (direct)

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________

 - 010413_Termination Options.doc


This e-mail confirms the site visits by your company at Pastoria.  The
relevant information is as follows:

	Pastoria
Site Visit Date	October 25, 2000
Site Visit Time	8:00 AM to 12:00 PM
Directions to Hotels	See DealBench - Due Diligence List/Plant Pictures Section
Meeting Time/Place	 Call Sam Wehn to arrange
Enron Site Visit Coordinator	Sam Wehn
	415.782.7811 (O)
	415.613.8580 (M)
	samuel.wehn@enron.com
Enron Site Visit Team	Sam Wehn
	Dean Russell

Tejon Ranch Access Permits

Attached is a document Tejon Ranch will require to be executed by each person
from your due diligence team as a condition to entering the Project Site.
Please have each member complete the form and fax them to me at
713.646.8863.  When completing the form, under "Area," enter "Proposed
Pastoria Energy Facility Site" and under "Purpose of Permit" enter "Due
Diligence Visit with Sam Wehn and Dean Russell of Enron".   Upon receipt, I
will forward them to Tejon Ranch for signature.

Send Team Member Information

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
List of your team members and titles
For outside consultants, state their employer
Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your designated
deal team leader

Due Diligence Questions

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for Pastoria, handling
all questions and responses.  Should you have any due diligence questions or
require copies of any oversized documents, please contact me at
713.345.8992.


The attached news release was distributed via PRNewswire on Thursday, August
23, 2001 at 5:20 pm (central time).  If you have any questions please
contact Mr. Frank Pici at (281) 584-5500.

Kimm Cashiola
Executive Assistant to VP - Finance & CFO
End User Support Help Desk
(281) 584-5571
 <mailto:kcashiola@mariner-energy.com> kcashiola@mariner-energy.com