Lisa,

We are still making a few last tweeks to this language. I will let you know once we have final agreement on this language.

Judy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hesse, Lisa
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	Thorne, Judy
Cc:	Hesse, Lisa
Subject:	RE:FW: Keep Whole Language

Judy,

Could you please push Nelson to review this language, so that we can get the confirmations out the door?
Thanks so much. lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Ferries, Nelson; Thorne, Judy
Cc:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Hesse, Lisa; Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	Keep Whole Language

Attached is a draft of the Keep Whole language we discussed last week.  Please review and provide any comments you may have.

 << File: KeepWhole1.doc >>


Your mom rocks!


I am out of the office today, Tueday, 5 February and my mails are not being forwarded.

If you have an urgent enquiry, please contact Shelley Maclean (x73065) or Liz Green (x89983) in Branding & Marketing Services.

Andy

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


I had to wait to get back to you this morning, sorry I will not be able to be there.  I need to leave
at 2:00 pm today to take my daughter to the dentist.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hook, Connie
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Lohman, TK; Faucheaux, Eric; Spraggins, Gary
Subject:	Firm Transport @ Halley

I sent a message out last week regarding this meeting for today that Jo Williams requested and have not received a response from you.  Please let me know if you are available or if I need to reschedule.

Meeting time:	3:00 - 4:00 pm
Place:		(VCR) 4102/696


Huh?  What are you doing Friday?
-----Original Message-----
From:   Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:04 PM
To:     Ingrid.Immer@williams.com
Subject:        RE: Church

I'm coming over after I work out today.  I'm coming over after i work out
tomorrow too.  I won't see you Friday or Saturday.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Immer+2C+20Ingrid+22+20+3CIngrid+2EImmer+40Williams+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com ]

   Sent:   Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:25 PM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  Church

   OK, so now I feel guilty.  Please feel free to go to church this
   evening.  You can come by afterwards.
           :)  ii


Energy Committee Members:
I apologize for the influx of e-mail from my desk, however, I have only
received a few RSVP's for the Energy Committee meeting scheduled for next
Wednesday, May 30.  It is imperative that we know before close of business
today exactly how many members plan on attending the meeting.  As I
explained in a previous e-mail, we have two possible hosts set up for
Wednesday's meeting, depending on how many members the facility can
accomodate.  Out of respect for the two companies that have kindly offered
their facility to our group, I must confirm with one of them today.  Please,
if you plan to attend the next Energy Committee meeting, RSVP by responding
to this e-mail before 5pm today.  Thank you.


Looks ok

Peggy Mahoney@EES
08/25/2000 01:24 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Press release

New version.  I think all suggested changes were made.
Let me know soon!!
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/25/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Johnson
08/25/2000 12:39 PM
To: Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Press release

Peggy:

Attached is the revised release.  On Gene's direction, I did not omit the
"economies of scale" phrase, but I did make changes which attribute it to
technology (AOL) and processing (IBM).

Let me know what everyone thinks.

Thanks,
Kathy


I was worried about this.  Sent it Monday night.  Kept getting bounced back.
Could you page me at 888.916.7184 and let me know that you get it?  I'm in
Portland.  Also, got Ginger's message re: paragraph on TW deal.  Steffes said
you didnt' need right away because EBR got cancelled.  When do you need and
do you want just background, or valuation calculations, too? Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 08:52 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/02/2000 06:36 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Mike Kahn: 415.986.2800.  ext. 205.    Let me know how it goes.

Best,
Jeff


I need 2 x-large shirts for Oglethorpe Power please.  I am going to give them
to Mr. Homco to pass on to Oglethorpe.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Gardenfeld/NY/WGM/US on
11/26/2001 01:19 PM ---------------------------

david.kirkland@bakerbotts.com on 11/26/2001 12:59:26 PM

To:   ken.randolph@dynegy.com, keith.fullenweider@dynegy.com, Thomas
      Roberts/NY/WGM/US@WGM, marita.makinen@wiel.com
cc:   Joel.Swanson@bakerbotts.com, Sarah.Cooper@bakerbotts.com,
      Tull.Florey@bakerbotts.com
Subject:  Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger

Attached are clean and marked copies of a revised version of the amendment.

In light of the changes, please discard the signature pages previously
furnished by Dynegy.

Please call me at 713.229.1101 or Joel Swanson at 713.229.1330 with any
questions or comments.

(See attached file: Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger.DOC)
(See attached file: Redline.rtf)

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (212-310-8000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Travers, Elise
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:02 PM
> To: Bob and Caterina (E-mail); Chris Liu (E-mail); Elite Kedan (E-mail);
> Gloria Guillo (E-mail); Kim Kelly (E-mail); Laurie Butler (E-mail); Liane
> Williams (E-mail); Mark Travers (E-mail); Mom Travers (E-mail); Paul
> Soulellis (E-mail); Vera Dragicevich (E-mail); Grace Tejada (E-mail); Lev
> Zeitlin (E-mail 2); Moyler, Joy; Rothwell, Amanda; Marcus, Sarah; Eggert,
> Jeffrey; Hulka, John; Lonn, Patrick; Wong, Linda; Agus, Jennifer; Brown,
> Donald; Tuck, Gregory; Brock, Alex; Farrar, Rick; 'msuomi@earthlink.net';
> 'grinner61@mindspring.com'; Jeff Travers (E-mail 2); Steven, Leslie; Mack,
> Nancy
> Subject: NEA, NPR, PBS petition
>
> On NPR's Morning Edition last week, Nina Totenberg
> said that if the Supreme Court supports Congress, it
> is in effect the end of the National Public Radio
> NPR), NEA & the Public Broadcasting SystemPBS).
> PBS, NPR and the arts are facing major cutbacks in
> funding.
>
> In spite of the efforts of each station to reduce
> spending costs and streamline their services, some
> government officials believe that the funding
> currently going to these programs is too large a
> portion of funding for something which is seen as not
> worthwhile.
>
> Currently, taxes from the general public for PBS equal
> $1.12 per person peryear, and the National Endowment
> for the Arts equals $. 64 a year.
>
> A January 1995 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll indicated
> that 76% of Americans wish to keep funding for PBS,
> third only to national defense and law enforcement as
> the most valuable programs for federal funding. The
> Senate and House appropriations committees each have
> 13 subcommittees with jurisdiction over many programs
> and agencies.
>
> Each subcommittee passes its own appropriation bill.
> The goal each year is to have each bill signed by the
> beginning of the fiscalyear, which is October 1. The
> only way that our representatives can be aware of the
> base of support for PBS and funding for these types of
> programs is by making our voices heard.
>
> Please add your name to this list and forward it to
> friends who believe in what this stands for. This list
> will be forwarded to the President of the United
> States and the Vice President of the United States.
>
> This petition is being passed around the Internet.
> Please add your name to it so that funding can be
> maintained for the NEA, NPR &PBS.
>
> HOW TO SIGN & FORWARD: IT'S EASY: Please keep this
> petitionrolling. Do not reply to me. Please sign and
> forward to others to sign. If you prefer not to sign,
> please send to the e-mail address indicated below.
>
> DON'T WORRY ABOUT DUPLICATES. This is being forwarded
> to several people at once to add their names to the
> petition. It won't matter if many people receive the
> same list as the names are being managed.This is for
> anyone who thinks NPR/PBS is a worthwhile
> expenditureof $1.12/year of their taxes, a petition
> follows.
>
> If you sign, please forward on to others. If not,
> please don't kill it--send it to the email address
> listed here:
>
>  wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu
> <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
>  <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.eduorkubi7975@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
>
> NOTE: If you happen to be the 150th, 200th, 250th,
> etc., signer of this petition, please forward a copy to:
>
> wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu>
>
> < <mailto:wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu>>
>
> This way we can keep track of the lists and organize them.
>
> Forward this to everyone you know, and help us to keep
> these programs alive.
>
> Thank you!
>
> NOTE: It is preferable that you SELECT (highlight) the
> entirety of this letter and then COPY it into a new
> outgoing message, rather than simply forwarding it. In
> your new outgoing message, add your name to the bottom
> of the list, then send it on. Or if option is
> available,do a SEND AGAIN.
>
> 951) Gary Canner FL 32609
>
> 952) Phyllis Canner FL 32609
>
> 953) Barb Bloomfield
>
> 954) Ken Swift, WI 53703
>
> 955) Carla Hacker, WI 53703
>
> 966) Christine Hall Reichelderfer, WI 53703
>
> 967) Julieanne Ehre, IL 60202
>
> 968) Joelle Ehre, CA 90036
>
> 969) Robin Hessman, MA 02118
>
> 970) Bert Kleinman, CA 90272
>
> 971) Jacqueline Wales, CA 90272
>
> 972) Martin Reubin, CA 90272
>
> 973) Gloria Saltzman, CA 94114
>
> 974) Deborah Gallin, CA 92691
>
> 975) Harry Ratner, CA 92708
>
> 976) Bradley Miller, CA 92618
>
> 977) Dyan Hobday-Brant, CA 92780
>
> 978) Jerry Marble, CA 91007
>
> 979) Don Cloud, CA 91750
>
> 980) Marsha Swayze, CA 95815
>
> 981) Rachel West, CA 95815
>
> 982) Orrin J. Olson, CA 95688
>
> 983) Tri D. Tran, CA 95688
>
> 984) Murray Friedman, CA 94585
>
> 985) Carolyn Marychild, CA 95688
>
> 986) Aim e Dominique, LA 70506
>
> 987) Marie C. Ackermann, FL 33426
>
> 988) Mary L. Starkweather, FL 34491
>
> 989)Don Starkweather, MI 49006
>
> 990) Linda Starkweather, NY 14469
>
> 991) Judith Ellis, NY 14469
>
> 992) Linda Chafin, FL 32308
>
> 993) Kathy Burks, FL 32344
>
> 994) Janice Broda, FL 32963
>
> 995) Chris Lockhart, FL 33437
>
> 996). Daniel F. Austin, FL 33431
>
> 997). Ramaswamy Narayanan, FL 33435
>
> 998). David Binninger, FL 33445
>
> 999). Steve Neuvenheim. CA 90069
>
> 1000) Steven Blaize, CA 90069
>
> 1001) Tracy Halloran, CA 91504
>
> 1002) Bill Halloran, CA 91202
>
> 1003) Bill Schlarb CA 91011
>
> 1004) Tom Irwin, CA 91214
>
> 1005) Darlene Irwin,CA 91214
>
> 1006) Laura Helgren CA 95066
>
> 1007) Chris Steres CA 95062
>
> 1008) Nancy Tara Gasta CA 95062
>
> 1009) Rona Edmunds CA 94114
>
> 1010) Eleanor Vera CA 90069
>
> 1011) Bernice Epstein Ca 90212
>
> 1012) Ellen Lazares, 93551
>
> 1013) Omar Wright, Ca 90066
>
> 1014) Marcella Greening, Ca 90066
>
> 1015) Robert Schwartz, Ca 90066
>
> 1016) Laura Napruszewski OR 97055
>
> 1017) Carolyn Mark, CA 94121
>
> 1018) Sara Newman, VA 22201
>
> 1019) David Newman, VA 22201
>
> 1020) Ruth Walkup, DC 20008
>
> 1021) Susan Girois, PA 19403
>
> 1022) Carol Brown, WA 98101
>
> 1023) Chris Motley, CA 94117
>
> 1024) Susan Cook, AK 99504
>
> 1025) Linda Bunker, CA 95821
>
> 1026) Charles Bunker, CA 95821
>
> 1027) Casey Bunker, NC 27607
>
> 1028) Kenneth Renwick, CA 95372
>
> 1029> Patricia Rowe, CA 95372
>
> 1030> Gregory Falken, CA 95379
>
> 1031) Dottie Barnett, CA 94611
>
> 1032) Elliott Barnett, CA 94611
>
> 1032) Erin Longley, CA 95472
>
> 1033) Stephen Raymond, MA 02129
>
> 1034) Stephen Gross, MA 02478
>
> 1035) Gabriela Romanow, MA 02467
>
> 1036) Mary McFadden, MA 02445
>
> 1037) Lawrence Stifler, MA 02445
>
> 1038) Diane Schmalensee, MA 02467
>
> 1039)Nancy Shaver, VA 22314
>
> 1049)Carter Kuster, NY. 10002
>
> 1050)Willie Cole, N.J. 07803
>
> 1051)Mbewe Escobar, N.J. 07803
>
> 1052)Rirkrit Tiravanija NYC 10009
>
> 1053)Laura Hoptman NYC 10003
>
> 1054)Anne Chu NYC 10003
>
> 1055) Margaret Murray NY 11201
>
> 1056) Janice Guy NY 10014
>
> 1057) Dave Muller CA 90065
>
> 1058) Terry Myers CA 90027
>
> 1059)  Rochelle Feinstein NY  10003
>
> 1060) Jessica Stockholder CT 06517
>
> 1061)  Andrea Zittel
>
> 1062)  Rachel Harrison  Brooklyn,NY 11211
>
> 1063) Cecily Brown NY 10011
>
> 1064) Simone Manwarring Brooklyn, NY 11211
>
> 1065) Elise Travers NY 10003
>
> 1065) Alex Brock NY 12430
>


Go ahead and ticket this - Do you have my continental FF number?  FN793648.

Thanks,

Kim

Diane Fitzgerald <diane.fitzgerald@travelpark.com> on 04/24/2001 01:15:40 PM
To:	"'kim.ward@enron.com'" <kim.ward@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Ward  26Apr. $1688.56, Continental flights.  Please review and ap	prove ticketing

                                          WARD/KIM
                                          EB 3204A

  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  APR 24 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  26APR HOUSTON TX     SAN JOSE CA    933A    1138A
CO 1067    Y          THU   G.BUSH INTERCO SAN JOSE MNPL
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:05 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                            SEAT 05F NO SMOKING CONFIRMED WARD/KIM(IDS5C0

UNITED AIRLINES       26APR SAN JOSE CA    LOS ANGELES CA 440P    559P
UA 2635    H          THU   SAN JOSE MNPL  INTL
           NON SMOKING      TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 7
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:19 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                      SEAT ASSIGNMENT UPON CHECK IN
                YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: Q2BL6E
           **************************************************
         YOUR TICKET REFLECTS A NEGOTIATED DISCOUNT FROM THE TAP
              THE PUBLISHED FARE FOR THIS TICKET IS $100.25
           **************************************************

HOTEL                 26APR GEORGIAN HOTEL
                      27APR 1415 OCEAN AVENUE
                            SANTA MONICA, CA 90401
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 310-395 9945
                            FAX: 310-451 3374
                            CONFIRMATION: 10287716
                            REFERENCE: YB2QENR
                            SINGLE ROOM QUEEN SIZE BED
                            RATE: ENR USD 198.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG KING
        TO AVOID NO SHOW BILLING, CANCEL 3PM 24HRS PRIOR HTL TIME

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  27APR LOS ANGELES CA HOUSTON TX     1245P   600P
CO 1010    Y          FRI   INTL           G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL 6     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC-10 ALL SERIES
                            SEAT 19K NO SMOKING CONFIRMED WARD/KIM(IDS5C0
          YOUR ETKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: N2B4KH/CONTINENTAL
                WINDOW SEAT UNAVAILABLE. AISLE CONFIRMED

MISCELLANEOUS         25AUG HOUSTON TX
                      SAT   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/N2B4KH  UA/Q2BL6E

WARD/KIM  S5C0342R1004

UA  FREQUENT FLYER UA00136763016
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED

Regards,
Diana Fitzgerald
Travel Agency In the Park
713-860-1152 - direct line
713-650-7000


---------------------- Forwarded by Smith L Day/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 12:50
PM ---------------------------
From: Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 07:45 AM
To: Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Frontera QSE

Smith, Could you please get these filed out executed and back to Frontera.
I'll get you Frank's mailing address for originals.  - Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Frank Busot" <flbusot@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:34 PM
To: mcurry@enron.com
Cc: Catherine Muckerman
Subject: Fwd: Frontera QSE

Mike,

Please complete and return to me.

Thanks,
Frank
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:33:58 -0400
From: "Catherine Muckerman" <cmmuckerman@tecoenergy.com>
To: "Frank Busot" <flbusot@tecoenergy.com>
Subject: Frontera QSE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_C49F2D5E.5E3F4E14"

Frank attached are the forms to file with ERCOT to name Enron as our QSE.  We
need for them to complete some of the contact information on both forms.
Once that has been done, they can sign the acknowledgment form and send the
completed documents back to us for our signature and filing.  Let me know if
you have any questions.  Of course, Enron can contact me if they have any
questions as well.

 - QSE Acknowledge.doc
 - ERCOT-Resource(4-18-01).doc


You have been subscribed to enl-dailyupdate-txt with the email address
"v.charles.weldon@enron.com"

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to leave-enl-dailyupdate-txt-28888J@estutenws11.energy.williams.com


In reference to Steve Kean and Cindy Olson's previous memo on the PRC,
one-hour classes for preparing and communicating performance feedback have
been scheduled.  If you would like to learn how to present feedback in an
effective and positive manner, please feel free to attend any of the
following classes:

Tuesday January 2 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 49C4

Wednesday January 3 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 20C2
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 20C2

Monday January 8 8:30 am to 9:30 pm Room 49C1
    1:30 am to 2:30 pm Room 20C2

Tuesday January 9 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4

Wednesday  January 10 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C3
    1:30 pm to 2:30 pm Room 49C3

Thursday January 11 8:30 am to 9:30 am Room 49C4

NOTE:  Notification of attendance is not necessary.


TO: Mark E. Haedicke   FROM: Mark Whitney, TheLaw.net Corporation
HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net  REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

Why, in the information age, do so many continue to pay so much to West and
Lexis? There is an excellent answer to this question. Enhancements.

--YOU OWN THE LAW

West and Lexis do not own the law. You do. Your tax dollars already paid for
the raw data generated by governmental instrumentalities; data that West and
Lexis snag and enhance. Thereafter, you pay and pay for a laundry list of
enhancements intended to make this raw data more useful.

--THE VALUE OF ENHANCEMENTS

In many cases these enhancements also lead to negative experiences such as
tedious training seminars, repeated calls to tech support, and an
overwhelming sense that for many bread and butter research and reference
tasks, there has to be a better, faster, easier, less expensive answer.

Are all of these enhancements really worth 10 - 20 times the price of a
subscription to TheLaw.net, particularly when West and Lexis are available on
the web 24/7 whenever you really need them as long as you have a credit card?
How much would you otherwise pay per year for unlimited access to the U.S.
Supreme Court, the 13 Federal Circuits, the 50 state supreme courts and the
intermediate level appellate courts? Call you local rep and ask?

--THE NUMBER ONE ENHANCEMENT: SEARCHABLE CASE LAW

In our opinion, the number one enhancement West and Lexis have to peddle are
their searchable case law databases. But we have one, too; the third largest
on earth next to theirs. With an annual subscription to TheLaw.net
Professional Convenience Edition you can search 24 hours a day for an entire
year, across 70+ libraries, spanning more than 175 Federal and state
appellate jurisdictions for just $345 if you sign up by the end of the month.
And we don't insult your intelligence by slicing things up. Everybody gets
everything we have on an unlimited use basis. Is that a model you've been
waiting for, or what?
See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm - also listed below

We even place browsable and searchable Federal and state statutes, forms,
rule, regs, courts, executive agency databases, legislative tracking tools,
news and reference desk resources, right where you want them; a mouse click
or two away on your desktop.

--CONSIDER OUR REFERENCES

Why take our word for it? Consider our references and reviews, some of which
we've published to our web site. http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

--THE THREE RULES OF OUR SUCCESS

At TheLaw.net Corporation we have three simple rules:

----RULE ONE: Everyone gets everything we have.
----RULE TWO: Similarly situated subscribers always pay the same price.
----RULE THREE: Current prices are always out in the open on our web site:
--------$395 annually for you
--------$575 for you and a partner
--------$1195 for your five user workgroup
--------Enterprise Licenses are also available.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

Imagine. No surprises. No meters. No printing, downloading or pay-per-view
fees. In short, none of the gamesmanship you have come to expect from the big
two compusearchers.

--CONSIDER OUR VISION: A FIRM FOUNDATION AT A LOW FLAT-RATE

TheLaw.net, privately held and successful from Day One, represents the next
logical step; a big improvement over slogging through two billion web pages
and otherwise watching legal research costs spiral out of control at a time
when with normal free market principles at work, such costs would be
plummeting.

In some instances, subscribers have found they no longer need to deal with
West or Lexis. In most instances they have found that the list of expensive
resources that they need to buy is much shorter. And we always remind them
that everything West and Lexis has is available pay-per-view, a la carte, via
the Internet. All you need is authorization from your client and a credit
card.

--SAVE $50 ON THELAW.NET PROFESSIONAL CONVENIENCE EDITION

Subscribing to TheLaw.net is not a decision you need to overthink. An
individual annual subscription to TheLaw.net Convenience Edition is on sale
right now for just $345. It includes an unconditional 30-day money back
guarantee and you can install at work, at home and on your laptop.

Stick your big toe in the water and see how good it feels. A lot has changed
since you went to law school. One of the biggest changes is that the days of
two legal research behemoths calling all of the shots and making all of the
rules are over. The time is now to lose the chains by subscribing to
TheLaw.net Professional today. At your option, we can build your package and
deliver it today via our web site or we can ship CDs via U.S. Priority Mail
or FedEx. We thank you for your time and we hope to hear from you soon.

Regards,

MARK WHITNEY
CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
Chicago - San Diego, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)

******************************************
USEFUL LINKS:
--HOME PAGE: http://www.thelaw.net
--BROWSABLE LIST OF TOP 25 FAQs: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs.htm
-----Printer Friendly FAQ&As: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs/pfversion.htm
--SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
--REFERENCES: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm
--SITE LICENSES: http://www.thelaw.net/enterprise.htm
--OVERVIEW: http://www.thelaw.net/overview.htm
--SOFTWARE: http://www.thelaw.net/software.htm
--CASE LAW: http://www.thelaw.net/caselaw.htm
--VIEW SAMPLESEARCH SCREENS: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm
--STATUTES/CONSTITUTIONS: http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm
--RULES: http://www.thelaw.net/rules.htm
--ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: http://www.thelaw.net/admin.htm
--FORMS: http://www.thelaw.net/forms.htm
--COURTS: http://www.thelaw.net/courts.htm
--EXECUTIVE AGENCIES: http://www.thelaw.net/executive.htm
--LEGISLATURES: http://www.thelaw.net/legislatures.htm
--TOPICS/PRACTICE AREAS: http://www.thelaw.net/topics.htm
--BAR ASSOC./LEGAL ORGS.: http://www.thelaw.net/bars.htm
--NEWS: http://www.thelaw.net/news.htm
--REFERENCE DESK: http://www.thelaw.net/refdesk.htm
********************************************

United States Supreme Court, 1900

Federal Circuit, 1982

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950
D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945

U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930
Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996
Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930
Massachusetts Appeals Court
New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930
Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950

U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930
Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950
Connecticut Appellate Court
New York Court of Appeals, 1955
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
Vermont Supreme Court, 1930

U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930
U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950
New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930
N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950
Pennsylvania Superior Court
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930
U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950
Maryland Special Court of Appeals
North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945
North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996
South Carolina Court of Appeals
Virginia Supreme Court, 1930
Virginia Court of Appeals
W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991

U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930
Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954
Mississippi Court of Appeals
Texas Supreme Court, 1950
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District

U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930
Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945
Kentucky Court of Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court, 1930
Michigan Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court, 1950
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930
Illinois Supreme Court, 1985
Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
Indiana Supreme Court, 1940
Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
Indiana Tax Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930
Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957
Arkansas Court of Appeals, 1995
Iowa Supreme Court
Iowa Court of Appeals
Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Missouri Supreme Court, 1960
Missouri Court of Appeals
Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965
Nebraska Court of Appeals
U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930
North Dakota Court of Appeals
South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965

U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941
Alaska Supreme Court, 1960
Alaska Court of Appeals
Arizona Supreme Court, 1930
Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
California Supreme Court, 1930
California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Idaho Supreme Court, 1965
Idaho Court of Appeals
Montana Supreme Court, 1993
Nevada Supreme Court, 1950
Oregon Supreme Court, 1950
Oregon Court of Appeals
Washington Supreme Court, 1935
Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930
Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Colorado Supreme Court, 1930
Colorado Court of Appeals
Kansas Supreme Court, 1982
Kansas Court of Appeals
New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Oklahoma Court of Appeals
Utah Supreme Court, 1950
Utah Court of Appeals
Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993

U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981
Alabama Supreme Court, 1955
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Florida Supreme Court, 1950
Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
Georgia Supreme Court, 1940
Georgia Court of Appeals

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy
professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to
remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the
email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll
free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy
Statement".
*****************************************************************


Hello! Megan Rogers has just sent you a greeting card from Bluemountain.com.

You can pick up your personal message here:

http://www1.bluemountain.com/cards/boxa227237u4/dbp8gwa9uz64jf.html

Your card will be available for the next 90 days.

This service is 100% FREE! :) Have a good day and have fun!

________________________________________________________________________
Accessing your card indicates agreement with Blue Mountain's Website Rules:
http://www.bluemountain.com/home/WebsiteRules.html

Send FREE Blue Mountain cards to friends and family (and attach gifts too!)
http://www.bluemountain.com


I made the following changes to these deal tickets in Sitara.

Deal		Contract	Change
1190838	1339		changed end date from 10/31/05 to 1/17/02, this was an agency contract with Louisiana Gas Services

1190859	2076		changed end date from 10/31/02 to 1/17/02, this was an agency contract with Louisiana Gas Servicews

1190861	2210		changed end date form 10/31/02 to 2/8/02, this was an agency contract with Reliant Energy Services.


This is from Mark Taylor's presentation he gave for Mark Haedicke at the ISDA
Energy Seminar in Houston earlier this year.  I know Elizabeth Sager did a
presentation last month for Mark H. he gave to some power group in D.C.
Also, Mark T. is currently working on one for bandwith trading for Tom Gros.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/26/99 01:00 PM
---------------------------

Kelly Sachs@ENRON
05/26/99 12:18 PM
To: Sylvia T Sauseda/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Power Point Presentation

Sylvia T Sauseda@ECT
05/26/99 11:43 AM

To: Kelly Sachs/Graphics/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Power Point Presentation

Kelly:

Please forward to Tana and myself Mark Haedicke presentation to ISDA.  The
presentation number is 1999 TJ 9030267-4.

Thank you,

sts


Please provide conversion factors for each of these curves.  Please resend upon completion.

Zakiyyah
xt 58146

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Paddack, Donald
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	Bennett, Joel; Bruce, Michelle; Earnest, Scott; Fondren, Mark; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Harding, Jason; Jackson, Lee; LeBroc, Christian; McClure, Zakiyyah; Najafov, Vusal; Nowlan Jr., John L.; Price, Brent A.; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sharma, Shifali; Swinney, John; Trevino, Susan
Subject:	Limits Report 10/24

 << OLE Object: PBrush >>


See Pat's email below regarding Dec numbers.

Smurfit is showing a termination date of 12/6, see attachment on what Enpower is showing.

I can clean this up if Smurfit is correct just let me know.

Thanks

MP

-----Original Message-----
From: Clevenger, Patrick [mailto:PCLEVENGER@SMURFIT.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Purcell, Mike
Cc: Confer, Mark
Subject: RE: Smurfit Dec numbers

Enron was in default on supply starting 12/5 and did not provide power
beyond 12/5.  This bill is not right at all.  I think Enron only provided
40mw 12/1 to 12/4 and 25mw 12/5.  Bill should be for 2400mwh at $54.65,
1440mwh at $33.50, and 600mwh at $46.72 (average price of both contracts).
Total of $182,232.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Purcell, Mike [mailto:Mike.Purcell@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:34 PM
To:	Pat Clevenger (E-mail)
Cc:	Confer, Mark
Subject:	Smurfit Dec numbers

 << File: 1201 Smurfit MTD.xls >> Pat

Here are the numbers for Dec.

Per John Maloney the annuity to Charge you for Rampdown has been waived for
the month of Dec.

Thanks

Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297

 <<1201 Smurfit MTD.xls>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Appointment-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 08:00
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Shackleton, Sara; Tweed, Sheila; Aronowitz, Alan; Moran, Tom; Hagelmann, Bjorn
Subject:	FInancial Book Status
When:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 14:00-15:00 (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	ECS 5th floor - Room TBA


RE: TWO NEW PIPELINE REPORTS

Lippman Consulting, Inc. is proud to announce that it has expanded it's
monthly pipeline reports by adding two new pipelines. The two new systems are
the Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company and  the CMS Trunkline Gas
Company. Both of these two new reports will contain the same detailed
information on the major receipts and deliveries along these pipelines as our
clients have grown to expect. With these two reports, we have completed our
coverage of the Rocky Mountain region and expanding our coverage of the Gulf
Coast region. Over the next few months, our clients will see continuing
expansion of our pipeline reporting coverage in the Gulf Coast region.

The cost for either one of these reports is $110 per month on an annual
subscription or the reports can be purchased on a one-time basis for $330. As
a reminder, our Retainer Clients will receive these new reports at no
additional charge. If you would like additional information on our Retainer
Client services or to order the report, please feel free to contact me by
e-mail at Lippmanc@AOL.com or phone at 915-581-1668.

George Lippman,
President
Lippman Consulting, Inc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 07:35
PM ---------------------------
From: Heidi Griffith@EES on 03/27/2000 02:21 PM EST
To: Molly LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: jjavins@enron.com
Subject: CNG-Hastings Rubin Resources

FYI.  Effective 4/1/2000, ENA will no longer have the Rubin Resources gas at
Hastings.  He had about 10,000 dths a month at Hastings.  However, we will
continue to get his gas at Bridgeport, which was only one meter.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Heidi


Dave, I am going to send Shawn your way - he has extensive development, asset
and project finance experience.  I would like him under your supervision to
manage our coal power development strategy - like we discussed it could be a
very robust strategy with multiple exit points.  I strongly believe that coal
needs to come back into the stack and that the existing development teams
(Parquet & Jacoby) are already buried under mid-stream gas development
opportunities.

This would incorporate acquisitions, development, technology,  asset sales,
emissions credits & technology, fuel supply and power sales.

Please update your 2001 budget to incorporate this new iniative.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
08:51 AM ---------------------------

Shawn Cumberland@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/27/2000 04:51 PM
To: David W Delainey@ECT
cc:
Subject: meeting

Dave:

Thanks for your time and patience today.

For now, I'll park the theoretical and focus on the practical.  (we can pick
up the other topics later over beers sometime)

I completely agree that the US coal-genco business can offer a huge near-term
win for those that move swiftly.

Thanks for offering me the shot to capitalize on it.

Shawn


Angie, would you go into July 31st and path 10,000 dt from deal 264613
(purchase from Power Gas Marketing) to deal 348393 (sale to EES) at meter
#20100.

thanks

	From:  Donnie Myers @ ENRON                           08/18/2000 09:54 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EOGS

Chris,

 I am not seeing this deal coming through Unify for ENA (EES shows a
purchase, but we are not showing a sale).  Could you please check to make
sure that we agree and that it is in the system?  Please let me know if you
have any questions.  Thanks...
---------------------- Forwarded by Donnie Myers/NA/Enron on 08/18/2000 09:47
AM ---------------------------

Anate Kor@EES
08/18/2000 09:25 AM
To: Donnie Myers/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: EOGS

Donnie,
This is  the info on the 10,013 (EOGS) in the EAST.

Let me know if I can do anything.

Anate

---------------------- Forwarded by Anate Kor/HOU/EES on 08/18/2000 09:23 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marde L Driscoll                           08/18/2000 08:35 AM
	Phone No: 713-853-9473 Phone
  713-345-7374 Fax
  888-620-2354 Pager
  6202354@skytel.com Pager e-mail

To: Anate Kor/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: EOGS

If this is for a volume of about 10,000 Dth it is a pool-to-pool transfer
from ENA (we are transferring this gas from Power Gas Marketing's pool).
When ENA purchased CES's book of business they acquired local production
behind the citygate.  This is one of those deals.  I did this deal with Chris
Germany of ENA.  If you need more information please let me know.  Thanks!  md

Anate Kor
08/17/2000 05:23 PM
To: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: EOGS

Hey Marde!

Our system shows we purchased this gas from ENA.  However, ENA does not have
this in their system.  Could you please give me a little more information on
the following:

July Business:
Pipeline -  EOGS
Point ID -  P-ECT-1186-001
Rec Meter -  IMBPURCH
Deal Meter -  11264

Thank you so much,
Anate


Congratulations one and all.  Very exciting, and well deserved to boot.  Look
forward to working with you in your new roles.

Best,
Jeff


FYI,

Today is the last day to make benefit enrollment elections.  You can call x37979, option number 5 to make changes.  You will need the company number, which is 0741.  Your pin is the last 4 digits of your social security number.  Savings enrollment options will be able to be changed at any point after November 20, and is not tied in with today's deadline.  Thanks,

Keegan
Enron Wholesale Services
713-345-3317


oh yeah- i forgot we covered that the other night.  there is no question
about your birthday and the superbowl unless denver plays.  i went to a
buddy's house to watch the game and left at halftime b/c i had no interest in
the game.  your favorite band was on at halftime.  i know you were excited
about that.  so why don't you come over this week and watch 9 1/2 weeks.


Richard:

I am sorry I did not forward this to you earlier. It is pretty much as I
anticipated it would be.

Please contact me with questions or comments.  I am still in Washington so
either leave me a voice mail in Houston or send me an email.
----- Forwarded by Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 03:37 PM -----

	"Weiland, William" <wweiland@velaw.com>
	11/15/2000 06:11 PM

		 To: "'Haedicke, Mark E.'" <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Banczak, Peggy J.'" <Peggy.Banczak@enron.com>, "Dilg, Joe"
<jdilg@velaw.com>, "'Elbertson, Janette'" <Janette.Elbertson@enron.com>
		 Subject: Enron-Vitro Amparo

Attached please find an electronic file containing a memorandum to file I
prepared after reviewing materials provided me by Peggy Banczak and Rogelio
Lopez-Velarde and following a meeting I had in Washington, D.C. on Monday of
this week with Peggy, Rogelio and Lic. Jorge Canals, an Amparo specialist
who has been representing Enron's interests in the Amparo proceedings.

As Joe Dilg indicated to you we are not Mexican lawyers and therefore cannot
give an opinion on the likelihood that the Mexican Appeals Court will uphold
the dismissal of the Enron-Vitro Amparo entered by the District
Administrative Court.  Nonetheless, I thought Lics. Lopez-Velade and Canals
had a very good understanding of the matter and well-reasoned views
concerning the likelihood that the dismissal would be overturned on appeal.
As indicated in my memorandum they consider the most likely outcome of the
appeal will be confirmation by the Appeals Court of the dismissal entered at
the trial court level.  I have known Lic. Lopez-Velarde for many years and
consider him a competent thoughtful lawyer.  I met Lic. Canals for the first
time Monday and was favorably impressed by him.  He comes highly recommended
by Lic. Lopez-Velarde.

The plaintiff in this matter has brought five other almost identical Amparo
suits against various energy permit holders.  Four of those suits have been
dismissed and their dismissals upheld on appeal.  Dismissals have also been
entered by District Administrative Courts in the Enron-Vitro Amparo and the
one other Amparo proceeding brought by plaintiff of which Mexican counsel is
aware.  Appeals of both those dismissals are pending.  Because of the
workings of the Mexican judicial system, the earlier Appeals Courts
decisions upholding the dismissals entered by District Administrative Courts
of the other four Amparo proceedings brought by the same entity that is the
plaintiff in the Enron-Vitro Amparo proceeding have no stare decisis effect,
but they do have persuasive value.

I am providing your assistant a copy of this message in the event you do not
have access to your E-mail.  Thank you for the opportunity to work on this
matter with Peggy and your Mexican counsel.  If you wish to discuss any
aspect of it with me, my direct line is 713-758-2518.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<Memorandum to file.DOC>>

 - Memorandum to file.DOC


Great!

-----Original Message-----
From: Dietz, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:31 AM
To: Corman, Shelley
Cc: Dietz, Rick
Subject: FPL Cash

FYI - FPL conducted a "test" wire yesterday and successfully sent a penny to our new Citibank account.  We should not have to worry about half of FGT's cash coming in today...
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Jeff,

I am not willing to guarantee to refinance the 1st lien on the stage in 4
years and drop the rate on both notes at that point to 8%.  There are several
reasons that I won't commit to this.  Exposure to interest fluctuations, the
large cash reserves needed, and the limited financial resources of the buyer
are the three biggest concerns.

What I am willing to do is lower the second note to 8% amortized over the
buyers choice of terms up to 30 years.  The existing note does not come due
until September 2009.  That is a long time.  The buyer may have sold the
property.  Interest rates may be lower.  I am bending over backwards to make
the deal work with such an attractive second note.  Guaranteeing to refinance
is pushing too far.

Can you clarify the dates in the contract.  Is the effective date the day the
earnest money is receipted or is it once the feasibility study is complete?

Hopefully the buyer can live with these terms.  I got your fax from the New
Braunfels buyer.  If we can't come to terms with the first buyer I will get
started on the list.

Email or call  me later today.

Phillip


Nice job.  Thanks.

	"Philip K. Verleger" <PVerleger@compuserve.com>
	01/24/2001 04:32 PM

		 To: "INTERNET:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conflicts of Interest

Jeff

I have never been accused of being subtle.  However, someone had to say it
and it is better to say it now than to have it come out later.

Phil

Dear David:

        I am writing this note to you and not the committee.  I am worried
that too many of the signatories can be accused of trying use their
academic positions to achieve results desired by their consulting clients.
I riase this issue because more than one person has told me that "Paul
Joscow is owned by Edison."  While such statements are generally wrong I
believe you need to be sensitive to the potential attack.  In particular, I
worry that our efforts will be undermined if too many of the individuals
signing the report have had extensive dealings with the state's three
largest utilities.  I can just see the headline "Apologists for utilities
offer solutions to state's energy problems."

        You know we will be attacked after we issue the manifesto.  The
question is, will the attacks have merit.  If we were all white as the
driven snow there would be no problem.  However, under such circumstances
we would all be poor.

        For this reason it is important to get independent academics and
non-academics with no connections to the utilities or generators to sign
the manifesto.  I fall into this later category as, I believe, do a number
of other individuals.  The addition of Solow would obviously help as would
Arrow or McFadden.  Dale Jorgenson would also be a great addition because
he has never worked or testified for these firms.  The same goes for Paul
Krugman.  On the other hand, Pual brings some heavy baggage.

        I understand it is important to have as many names attached to the
manifesto as possible.  However, Paul's name may hurt.

Phil


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000009797&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000009797
Request Create Date : 12/11/00 9:39:04 AM
Requested For       : diana.andel@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL Canada Backoffice Bridge Monitor
Resource Type       : Applications


Thanks a million, Ana Paula, Randy and Sami. Let me know how it goes.

JWVS

	"APG - Ana Paula Gon?alves" <APG@tozzini.com.br>
	05/16/2001 01:38 PM

		 To: <John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <Sami.Arap@enron.com>
		 cc: <daniele.cunha@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>,
<Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>, "PCS - Paula Corina Santone"
<paula@tozzini.com.br>, "RQB - Renata Siciliano Quartim Barbosa"
<RQB@tozzini.com.br>
		 Subject: Re: Enc.: Labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against EPCB
and EPE

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

Thank you for your prompt response regarding the matter.
I have received you mail asking me to call you and I have reached Mr. Randy
Pais.

According to the discussed with him, please be informed that Mr. Arap
Sobrinho  as delegate manager in EPCB articles of association is able to sign
both the company representative letter, as well as the power of attorney to
Tozzini Freire.

It is important to clarify that Ms. Cunha shall be representing EPCB in
court, since the labor action has been filed against both EPCB and EPE and
not SCC.

Unfortunately, these documents have to be filed before court in their
originals. Mr. Pais has requested me to fax me a copy of the signed power of
attorney as soon as I have it.

As regards the correspondence regarding this matter, I am already copying all
of the people mentioned by you.

Should you need any further assistance in connection with the matter, please
advise.

Best regards,
Ana Paula Gon?alves

>>> <John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com> 15/05/01 20:32 >>>

Ana Paula, thanks for keeping after me on this.

We have decided to rely on Ms. Cunha as the company representative to be
present in court. This will avoid the need for an official, court appointed
tramslator. She will be supported by Randy Pais, Nate Neuman or others as
needed either from Houston or traveling to Brazil as needed. The SCC expat
presence in Brazil will be greatly diminished in the next several weeks.

Please copy Ms. Cunha  Mr. Randy Pais and Mr. Richard Sanders on all
correspondence related to this matter. Randy Pais is the internal
transactional lawyer at EEOS/SCC working the Cuiaba project; Richard
Sanders is the internal litigation management lawyer at Enron Wholesale who
supports our business unit.

I want to make sure I understand what is meant by the power of attorney and
company representative letter. Are these the documents that appoint Ms.
Cunha as the SCC company representative for the purposes of this matter?
Sami,  if this is right I would have no objections for you signing these
documents, but you don't have any position with SCC. Weren't these to be
give n to Nate Neuman for him to have executed at the SCC office in Cuiaba?

Ana Paula, is it possible to e-mail or fax the documents to us here, and
for us to signand fax back, or does the court need originals?

JWVS

                    "APG - Ana
                    Paula                To:
<john.schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>
                    Gon?alves"           cc:     "PCS - Paula Corina Santone"
<paula@tozzini.com.br>, "RQB -
                    <APG@tozzini.        Renata Siciliano Quartim Barbosa"
<RQB@tozzini.com.br>
                    com.br>              Subject:     Enc.: Labor action
filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against
                                         EPCB    and EPE
                    05/15/2001
                    06:09 PM

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

Reference is made to our mail dated as of May 11th, 2001, in order to
inform you that, according to understandings held with Ms. Daniele Cunha,
the power of attorney and the company representative letter related to the
labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago has already been forwarded to Mr.
Sami Arap Sobrinho.

Taking into account the fact that Mr. Arap Sobrinho shall only sign the
above mentioned documents with your express consent, we kindly request you
to contact him regarding the issue, the sooner the possible. In fact, we
will appreciate if you could contact him tomorrow, so that the documents
may be filed at the labor court within the established deadline.

Since Ms. Daniele Cunha shall be functioning as the company representative
at this case, I would like to know if she may be copied of all of the
exchanged mail regarding the matter.

At last, we await your guidance as to whom shall the legal fees billing
related to this case be addressed to.

Best regards,
APG
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 16:48:32 -0300
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?APG=20-=20Ana=20Paula=20Gon=E7alves?="
<APG@tozzini.com.br>
To: <john.schwartzenburg@enron.com>, <randy.pais@enron.com>
Cc: "PCS - Paula Corina Santone" <paula@tozzini.com.br>,     "RQB - Renata
Siciliano Quartim Barbosa" <RQB@tozzini.com.br>
Subject: Labor action filed by Luiz Alexandre Zago against EPCB and EPE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_DF85E83D.2C4D33DD"

Privileged and confidential

Dear John:

The purpose of this mail is to provide you with the term of the hearing at
court, copy attached hereto, which took place on May 07th, 2001, at the
labor action filed by Luis Alexandre Zago, occasion in which the written
defense has been presented by EPCB, copy also attached hereto.

According to such a hearing term, it has been designated a discovery
hearing at court for May 30th, 2001, at 3 p.m., occasion in which a company
representative of EPCB, with his employee booklet (CTPS), shall attend the
hearing, as well as up to three witnesses  that may be able to testify
favorably to EPCB.

In this sense, below please find the subject over which evidence shall be
produced by EPCB at such a discovery hearing:

i) that EPE hired the Superior Construction Company in order to build the
thermo electric plant;

ii) that the Superior Construction Company has entered into a re-hiring
agreement with the Siemens Ltda. company in order to build the thermo
electric plant, company which, in its turn, has hired the ENESA company for
such a purpose;

iii) that the Superior Construction Company has used EPCB in order to
diligence in the sense that the thermo electric plant building was been
performed in accordance with the hired by and between the EPE and Superior
Company Construction companies;

iv) that the claimant was an employee of the ENESA company; that ENESA
company paid the employee's salaries; that EPE and EPCB have never
contacted the claimant; that the ENESA company was the responsible for the
selection of the professionals that it understood as necessary for the
services compliance; that it was up to ENESA company to give commands to
the claimant; that it was ENESA company that determined  the services to be
performed by the claimant.

We would also like to inform that it has been determined by the court the
deadline of 15 days for EPCB to present at the case files (i) its articles
of associations; (ii) power of attorney and (iii) company representative
letter. For such, we kindly request that such documents, duly certified, be
forwarded directly to our local correspondent attorney in Cuiab? - Ms.
Luciana Cristina Pereira Cardoso, at the address, Av. Historiador Rubens de
Mendon?a, 1836, sala 905, bairro Bosque da Sa?de, Cuiab?, MT, up till May
18th, 2001, so that we may present them at the case files in the stipulated
deadline.

Also, we would like to stress that in case EPCB decides to indicate a
company representative that has not the Portuguese as his mother language
to attend the hearing at court, it will be necessary to request court the
indication of a public sworn translator. Therefore, we kindly request you
to inform us, up till May 21st, 2001, if such will be needed so that we may
take the necessary measures in this regard in time.

We do clarify, however, that we find it unnecessary the attendance of a
foreign company representative in the extent that Ms. Daniele Cunha, who
attended the first hearing at court, has shown enough and necessary
knowledge in order to function as company representative at the present
case.

At last, please advise as to whom shall the legal fees billing related to
this case be addressed to.

Please contact us should you need any further clarification on the above.

Best regards,
Ana Paula Gon?alves.

P.S. Please advise should you need a free translation of both the term of
the hearing, as well as of the written defense presented by EPCB in the
case.

(See attached file: EPE.DOC)
(See attached file: ZAGO.DOC)


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 07:55 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	01/11/2001 07:22 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan"
<mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>,
"Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@acom2.com>, "DJ
Smith" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Delany Hunter"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Cary Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Bev
Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Chuck Cole"
<ccole@advocation-inc.com>
		 Subject: ECA Hearing Summary

The new Assembly Committee on Energy Costs and Availability.(ECA) met today
and heard two bills: ABX 5 (Keeley), relating to the ISO and PX governing
boards, and ABX 6 (Dutra/Pescetti), relating to utility retention of assets.
Both measures passed with only one dissenting vote on ABX 6 (Asm. John
Campbell).

Although ABX 5 passed in its current form, possible amendments to be taken
in the Senate would include:  increasing the number of governing board
members, increasing the length of the terms, and addressing the issue of
Governor appointees on the EOB confirming Governor appointees on the ISO and
PX.  Testifying in support of the measure were the Consumers Union, EOB,
CalPIRG, TURN, ORA and the California Utilities Employees.  The ISO
testified in opposition based on a past FERC letter which opposes an
appointed Board.

The ABX 6 debate was over the conflict in the Public Utilities Code
regarding utility asset retention (Sections 851 and 377).   The debate,
however, was not limited to this one point.  Asm. Leonard started the ball
rolling when he noted a problem when some generation in the state is
regulated (the utility generation) and some isn,t (the new generators).
This issue was picked up by Asms. Steinberg, Jackson, Oropeza, and Diaz, who
suggested that there may need to be legislation to regulate all the
generation in the state.  Asm. Wright did a good job pointing out that in
doing so, the state would have to offer generator owners something in return
the state isn,t able to afford.

When Loretta Lynch spoke in support of the bill she began with the Stage 3
alert, noting there was 15,000 megawatts off-line today and generators were
refusing to allow state inspectors into their plants.  Although the only
company she named was AES, she made every committee member believe it was
everyone.  In response to a question about long-term contracts, she said
that since August this CPUC has allowed it and the utilities are the ones
who refuse to enter into contracts.

Pete Conaty from labor repeated his statement that when the new generators
purchased these plants, they significantly reduced the labor force, ran the
plants harder than when the utilities ran them and that is why the plants
are breaking down.

Both measures will be debated on the Assembly floor next when they go into
session tomorrow morning.

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modsette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19
PM ---------------------------

Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!

 - Evilke~1.mpe


When: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:30 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 05 075

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 08:32 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	Sent by: Kaye Ellis
	08/31/2000 05:19 PM

		 To: Kristina Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin
Howard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, julia.h.chin@enron.com,
Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Raptor I Avici

This confirm is ready for execution.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 08:55 AM
---------------------------

Luis Mena@ENRON
12/06/2000 08:41 AM
To: Roberto Martinez/HOU/EES@EES, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Top 10 Colleges with the Best Looking Girls

Thank you for your attention.
---------------------- Forwarded by Luis Mena/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 08:33 AM
---------------------------

"Jason Van Kirk" <jvankirk@mercatorcapital.com> on 12/06/2000 08:06:56 AM
Please respond to <jvankirk@mercatorcapital.com>
To: "Oscar Szigeti" <oszigeti@lifeminders.com>, "Nick Schuneman"
<wuhbow@yahoo.com>, "Myron Van Kirk" <mvankirk@vkri.com>, "Michael J. Smith"
<msmith@mercatorcapital.com>, "Mark Murray" <mmurray@nationaljournal.com>,
"Luis Mena" <Luis_Mena@ei.enron.com>, "John F. Baring"
<jbaring@mercatorcapital.com>, "John Appuliese" <jappuliese@aol.com>,
"Guillaume Girard" <ggirard@mercatorcapital.com>, "Erin D. Carlson"
<e.carlson@mail.utexas.edu>, "Dave Foster" <BDLFoster@aol.com>, "Chris
Schuneman" <CSCHUNEMAN@itg.mea.com>, "Rod Hackman"
<rhackman@mercatorcapital.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Top 10 Colleges with the Best Looking Girls

May I have your attention, please!!

<ahem>

Just wanted everyone to know that Texas was voted #1 by Playboy magazine for
"Colleges with the Best Looking Girls".  As if we needed affirmation of this
fact...

But, now, we have full-fledged proof to show the world where it's at.

I've never been prouder to say, "Hook 'em Horns!!"

This comes from playboy.com

The List:

1.  The University of Texas
2.  Arizona State
3.  UCLA
4.  University of Florida
5.  University of Arizona
6.  Florida State
7.  University of Alabama
8.  University of Colorado
9.  East Carolina
10. University of Georgia


Current Facts:

Mary Grisaffi verified internally that the invoice associated with the Performance Bond in question has not been paid.
Mary Grisaffi and Martin O'Leary will double check with the Performance Bond issuance company to make sure that the invoice has not been paid.
Rogers Herndon has approved the payment, via the online IBUYIT system, so the payment is in the pipeline for payment.
Rogers Herndon has indicated that items of this nature in the future should be approved by the New Market Approval Team (Jim Wood et. al).
Gloria Ogenyi has been notified of all of the pertinent information surrounding the Performance Bond in question.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 713.853.3561.

Richard Ring

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grisaffi, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	Furey, Denise; Herndon, Rogers; Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki; Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Bond Requirement

Denise, I have spoken to Richard Ring and Gloria Ogenyi, they assured me that it would be taken care of.  Thanks for your attention to the matter!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Furey, Denise
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Grisaffi, Mary; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	RE: Bond Requirement

Mary, who told you we would not pay for this bond?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:44 PM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Cc:	Grisaffi, Mary; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Furey, Denise; Richter, Jeff; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	Bond Requirement

Gloria -

Could you please help us gather the facts on what the $12 MM Surety Bond currently being requested (#6131506) is for - is this PG&E?.  Mary informed me that funds ($36,000) may not be available, is this correct?

It is my understanding that Credit, Services and Regulatory will be monitoring and processing bond requirements.  As such, I would like to know how this would impact EES' business and definitely want to be aware of any default situation prior to reading about it in the press.

Thanks,
Rogers


Ditto Credit.

Thanks,

Shari

	Tana Jones
	03/07/2001 05:30 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-07-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 05:30 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/07/2001 05:22 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-07-01

Please see attached.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

Jim Garven <jgarven@lsu.edu> on 01/26/2000 12:49:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: LSU seminar visit

Vince,

Please send a package of article reprints to the attention of Joan Payne at
the following address:

Joan Payne
Department of Finance
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
2163 CEBA
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

In your package, please indicate which presentation each reprint is
intended for; i.e., whether it is for student consumption on Thursday
afternoon or finance faculty/doctoral student consumption on Friday
morning.  Joan can make sure that we get the right number of copies
produced for the respective audiences.

Concerning powerpoints-- just email these files to me and if it is all
right with you I will make them available for download by the faculty and
students on the class and research seminar webpages.

Thanks again for being willing to visit LSU and present your knowledge to
our faculty and students.

Sincerely,

Jim Garven

At 01:39 PM 1/18/2000 +0000, you wrote:

>Jim,
>
>I can send you copies of the  reprints of some papers I wrote
>or co-authored. Please, let me know how many copies do you need.
>
>I shall prepare power point presentations for the student meeting
>and for the faculty meeting.
>
>For the students: review of my group (things we work on) with an intention
>of generating some interest among the students and soliciting resumes.
>
>For the faculty meeting: challenges that energy markets pose to financial
>modeling.
>I shall be able to E-mail the Power Point presentations later this month.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>Jim Garven <jgarven@lsu.edu> on 01/17/2000 04:00:25 PM
>
>To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: LSU seminar visit
>
>
>
>Dear Vince,
>
>Would you mind emailing to me a short biography/vita sometime when you get
>a chance?  Also, if you have a paper to circulate or any PowerPoint slides
>that you'll want to use either in your presentations to my students
>Thursday afternoon, 2/3, or to the faculty seminar on Friday morning, 2/4,
>please email these to me.  This would be greatly appreciated.
>
>My colleagues and I are looking forward to your visit on Feb. 3-4 to LSU.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Jim Garven
>
>
>_________________________________________
>James R. Garven
>William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
>Department of Finance
>2158 CEBA
>E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
>Louisiana State University
>Baton Rouge, LA  70803-6308
>
>Voice (225) 388-0477  |  Fax: (800) 859-6361
>
>E-mail:  jgarven@lsu.edu
>Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
>Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
>Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
>_________________________________________

_________________________________________
James R. Garven
William H. Wright, Jr. Endowed Chair for Financial Services
Department of Finance
2158 CEBA
E. J. Ourso College of Business Administration
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA  70803-6308

Voice (225) 388-0477  |  Fax: (800) 859-6361

E-mail:  jgarven@lsu.edu
Home Page: http://garven.lsu.edu
Vita: http://garven.lsu.edu/dossier.html
Research Paper Archive: http://garven.lsu.edu/research.html
_________________________________________
 - att1.htm


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 10:09 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	12/07/2000 07:16 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-417) Exchange Board Approves Initial Product Slate for enymex

M E M O R A N D U M

TO:     All New York Mercantile Exchange members

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:        Exchange Board Approves Initial Product Slate for enymexsm

DATE:   December 7, 2000

Notice # 00-417
=====================================================

The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.,  board of directors last night
approved a range of energy products for listing on enymex, the Exchange's
internet-based trading system, intended to be launched during the second
quarter of 2001.

These products were designed to replicate the most actively traded
over-the-counter energy instruments, introducing the added benefits of
clearing services; a neutral, centralized marketplace; and a highly
sophisticated technological platform.  While there may be additional products
developed for introduction at launch, including more internationally based
contracts, and there will certainly be more shortly thereafter, these
contracts were selected as natural adjuncts to our established markets
because of their close relationships to these liquid benchmarks.

The contracts include:

   A West Texas Intermediate crude oil calendar swap contract

 A Henry Hub natural gas swap contract based on the final settlement price
for the Exchange's futures contract

 Spread calendar swap contracts based on the differential between Platts (a
division of The McGraw-Hill Companies) quoted prices for Gulf Coast unleaded
87 gasoline and the Exchange light, sweet crude oil and New York Harbor
unleaded gasoline futures contracts

 Spread calendar swap contracts based on the differentials between the Platts
quoted price for Gulf Coast Pipeline No. 2 heating oil and the Exchange light
sweet crude oil and New York Harbor heating oil futures

 Basis swap contracts based on the differential between the final settlement
price for the Henry Hub natural gas futures contract and Inside FERC's Gas
Market Report quoted indexes for Henry Hub; El Paso San Juan Basin; Houston
Ship Channel; and Transco Zone 6

 Basis swap contracts based on the differential between the Exchange Henry
Hub natural gas futures contract and the Canadian Gas Price Reporter Alberta
spot month price (based on AECO C/NIT)

 Basis swap contracts based on the differential between the Exchange Henry
Hub natural gas futures price and the Natural Gas Intelligence quoted index
prices for Chicago City Gate and the southern California border

  Louisiana Light Sweet and West Texas Sour crude oil contracts

 A Dubai crude oil calendar swap

Terms and conditions include a unit size of 1,000 barrels for each of the
crude oil and petroleum product/crude oil spread contract; 42,000 gallons for
each heating oil and gasoline contract; and 5,000 million British thermal
units (mmBtus) for each natural gas contract.  Prices will quoted in U.S.
dollars and cents per barrel, gallon or mmBtu.  Other specifications are:

West Texas Intermediate crude oil calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the settlement price of the
first nearby light, sweet crude oil futures contract throughout the contract
month (example: the July 2001 contract will be based upon the average of the
settlement prices for the August 2001 futures contract during July 2001 until
it ceases trading and the settlement prices for the September 2001 contract
for the remainder of the month)

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent per barrel

Henry Hub natural gas swap

Termination of Trading:  The third business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the final settlement price of the Exchange
Henry Hub natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

U.S. Gulf Coast unleaded 87 gasoline crack spread calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the Platts U.S. Gulf Coast
unleaded 87 gasoline mean minus the settlement price of the first nearby
light, sweet crude oil futures contract throughout the contract month

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent per barrel

Unleaded 87 gasoline up-down calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the Platts U.S. Gulf Coast
unleaded 87 gasoline mean minus the settlement price of the first nearby
Exchange New York Harbor unleaded gasoline futures contract throughout the
contract month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.0001 per gallon

U.S. Gulf Coast No 2 heating oil crack spread calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the Platts U.S. Gulf Coast
pipeline No. 2 heating oil mean minus the settlement price of the first
nearby light, sweet crude oil futures contract throughout the contract month

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent per barrel

No. 2 heating oil up-down calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the Platts U.S. Gulf Coast No.
2 pipeline mean minus the settlement price of the first nearby Exchange New
York Harbor No. 2 heating oil futures contract throughout the contract month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.0001 per gallon

Henry Hub natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the Inside FERC Gas Market Report Henry Hub
index price minus the final settlement price of the Exchange Henry Hub
natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

San Juan natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the Inside FERC Gas Market Report El Paso San
Juan Basin index price minus the final settlement price of the Exchange Henry
Hub natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

Houston Ship Channel natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the Inside FERC Gas Market Report Houston Ship
Channel index price minus the final settlement price of the Exchange Henry
Hub natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

Transco Zone 6 natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the Inside FERC Gas Market Report Transco Zone
6 index price minus the final settlement price of the Exchange Henry Hub
natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

AECO/NIT natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the Canadian Gas Price Reporter Alberta spot
month price for AECO C/NIT price minus the final settlement price of the
Exchange Henry Hub natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

Chicago natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the bid week price quoted for the Chicago
Citygate, under the Midwest heading in the Natural Gas Intelligence bid week
survey, minus the final settlement price of the Exchange Henry Hub natural
gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

Socal natural gas basis swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day prior to the contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the bid week price quoted for the Southern
California border average, under the California heading in the Natural Gas
Intelligence bid week survey, minus the final settlement price of the
Exchange Henry Hub natural gas futures contract for the corresponding month

Minimum Price Fluctuation:  $0.001 per mmBtu

Louisiana Light Sweet crude oil futures

Termination of Trading:  Third business day prior to the 25th calendar day of
the month preceding the contract month.  If the 25th calendar is a
non-business day, trading terminates on the third day prior to the last
preceding business day.

Delivery:  Physical in St. James, Louisiana

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent

West Texas Sour crude oil futures

Termination of Trading:  Third business day prior to the 25th calendar day.
If the 25th calendar is a non-business day, trading terminates on the third
day prior to the last preceding business day.

Delivery:  Physical in Midland, Texas

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent per barrel

Dubai crude oil calendar swap

Termination of Trading:  The last business day of the month prior to the
contract month.

Delivery:  Financial, based on the average of the Platts Dubai frontline mean

Minimum Price Fluctuation: One cent per barrel

============================================================

Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements
 The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.,  has attempted, wherever possible,
to make statements in good faith by using words such as anticipate, believes,
expects, and words and terms of similar substance in connection with any
discussion of its present and future operations within the industry. Any
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of the Exchange, involve a
number of risks, trends,  uncertainties, and other factors which may cause
actual results to differ materially, including; the Exchange,s receipt of the
necessary Commodity Futures Trading Commission approval; timely performance
and cooperative effort of exchange and technology partners; and changes in
financial or business conditions at the Exchange.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-417)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Paul, sorry for the delay in responding, I do not have a direct relationship
with anyone in Reliant or TXU; however, Jim Ducote and Janet Dietrich may be
the best spots in Enron to pursue.

Regards
Delainey


Here is the latest turbine comparison sheet.  Let me know if you have any
questions.
Ben
3-7998


Just received a call from Virginia Loebel (609-936-8057) for a return of the $100,000 cash collateral (Independent Amount) we are holding.  She is sending a request which I will forward.  She says all trades have rolled off the books.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Exchange Information <Marketing@NYMEX.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 8:31 AM
To:	Exchange Information
Subject:	(01-411) NEW NYMEX LARGE ORDER EXECUTION RULE FOR NATURAL GAS FUT	URES

November 30, 2001
Notice No. 01-411

TO:		NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
		NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:		J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

SUBJECT:	NEW NYMEX LARGE ORDER EXECUTION RULE FOR NATURAL GAS FUTURES
____________________________________________________________________________
_____

Yesterday, the Exchange distributed Notice to Members No. 01-411, which
summarized a new large order execution (LOX) that begins today in the first
two months of the natural gas futures contract.  As an informational
follow-up to yesterday's notice, this notice includes the text of the new
LOX rule.

				NEW NYMEX RULE 6.58

Rule 6.58.	LARGE LOT TRADING OF FUTURES CONTRACTS (PILOT PROGAM)

A Floor Member may buy or sell a large lot quantity of futures contracts at
or above the minimum amount specified below at a single price on an all or
none basis, provided that each such transaction is conducted on the Exchange
trading floor in accordance with the large order execution ("LOX")
procedures specified in this rule.

(A) Eligible Futures Contract and Minimum LOX Transaction Size.  LOX
transactions may be effected only for transactions in the following NYMEX
Division futures contracts and for no less than the following minimum LOX
transaction quantities:

			Futures Contract 		Contract Months
Minimum LOX Transaction Size

			Natural Gas			1st and 2nd nearby
250
	(Six-Month Pilot Program)

(B) Eligible Orders.  A member may not execute any order by means of a LOX
transaction unless the LOX bid or Offer price is the best price available to
satisfy the terms of the order or unless the order includes specific
instructions to execute a LOX transaction.

(C) Request for Quote.  To make a request for quote (RFQ) for a LOX
transaction, an initiating Floor Member (Initiating Member) will announce an
interest in executing a LOX transaction either by requesting a LOX Bid or
Offer or both, from a specified location in the ring.  In addition, the
Initiating Member must specify to the ring the total quantity and contract
month of the RFQ.  All terms of the RFQ including the identity of the
Initiating Member will be recorded by the LOX Book Holder (LBH).  In any
case that a LOX RFQ results in a response deemed by the LBH to be
reasonable, the Initiating Member will incur RFQ fees, regardless of whether
or not that Floor Member executes a trade.

There shall be only one active RFQ for a contract month at a time.

The maximum quantity allowed for a LOX RFQ is 5,000 contracts.

(D) Bids and Offers in Response to a LOX RFQ. Any Floor Member that has bid
and/or offered the best price in response to the LOX RFQ for the full
quantity stated in the LOX RFQ and has been recognized by the LBH as making
a reasonable bid or offer will be the Initial Respondent.  Any Floor Member
responding to a LOX RFQ must indicate that the responding LOX bid or LOX
offer is in response to such RFQ (LOX Bid or Offer).  Once a LOX Bid and/or
Offer has been made and deemed by the LBH to be an acceptable bid and/or
offer, such bid or offer will be recorded by the LBH and will be active for
30 seconds from the time it has been recognized by the LBH or until it has
been expressly withdrawn, with acknowledgement from the LBH, by the Floor
Member making such bid or offer.  All LOX bids and offers must be quoted in
half cent or full cent increments.

(1) LOX Bids and Offers Outside Non-LOX Spread. A LOX Bid (Offer) may be at
or above (below) the instant bid (offer) for non-LOX trading being bid or
offered in the ring for that futures contract month.

(2) Aggregation of Orders by Brokers. Floor Members acting as brokers may
bundle limit orders to bid and/or offer in response to the LOX RFQ.  If the
total of the orders is less than the requested amount, the responding broker
can trade for his own account or an account which he controls, the
difference between the requested amount and the total of the orders.  In the
event that a broker bundles limit orders in connection with a LOX execution,
all bundled limited orders must receive the LOX execution price.

(3) Aggregation by Floor Members Trading for Proprietary Accounts.  In
response to a LOX RFQ, Floor Members trading for their proprietary accounts
may join together in bidding and/or offering for the full quantity of the
LOX RFQ.  Such proprietary accounts either may be a personal account in the
case of an individual member or a house proprietary account in the case of a
Member Firm or Clearing Member with a representative on the Trading Floor.

(4) Secondary Trading Right for Proprietary Accounts.  In response to a LOX
RFQ, only a Floor Member trading for his proprietary account, or for
proprietary accounts joined together as per section (D)(3) of this rule, may
bid and/or offer for a portion of the LOX RFQ, provided, however, that such
quantity bid and/or offered must be for an amount no less than the Minimum
LOX Transaction Size and that such bid and/or offer can only be submitted if
an Initial Respondent has been identified by the LBH and that Initial
Respondent is a Floor Member acting as a broker.  This right will be known
as a Secondary Trading Right.

In order to exercise the Secondary Trading Right, each Member must state
his/her intentions to the LBH.  For purposes of the Secondary Trading Right,
Floor Members trading for their proprietary trading accounts may exercise
this right by joining a bid or offer at any time prior to execution of the
LOX transaction and will be entitled to an aggregate amount of up to 50% of
the quantity stated in the RFQ.

When a Floor Member combines customer orders with proprietary business and
is recognized as the Initial Respondent, any reduction in the ultimate
allocation that results from an exercise of a Secondary Trading Right will
result in fills first allocated to the customer(s) with any remainder to the
Floor Member.  In addition, if, as the result of such an exercise, a broker
does not have a quantity sufficient to fill each of the orders that were
aggregated, the broker shall allocate fills according to the following
requirements:

a)	the fills shall be allocated pursuant to a predetermined allocation
methodology made available to the customers prior to the execution;
b)	the allocation shall be made as soon as practicable after the
transaction is executed;
c)	the allocation shall be fair and equitable and no account or group
of accounts may receive consistently favorable or unfavorable treatment;
d)	the allocation methodology shall be sufficiently objective and
specific so that it can verified for any given trade; and
e)	the allocation methodology must be consistently applied.

Floor Members may not exercise a Secondary Trading Right if such Floor
Member is the Initial Respondent acting as a broker.

(5) Trading Priority.  Any Floor Member who becomes the Initial Respondent
willing to trade the full quantity stated in the LOX RFQ at the ultimate
best bid and, or best offer will have a right of trading priority which will
entitle him to the full quantity stated in the RFQ, except in the case when
a Secondary Trading Right is exercised.

(E) LOX Execution.
1.  Time Limit Restriction. Once an Initial Respondent has been recognized
by the LBH, only the Initiating Member requesting the LOX RFQ, may hit such
LOX Bid or Offer (or both) and must do so within 30 seconds of LBH
recognition of the Initial Respondent subject to the following conditions:

2.	Exercise of Secondary Trading Rights.   If one or more Floor Members
exercises the Secondary Trading Rights provided by this rule, the LBH will
enforce such rights in the following manner:

Each Floor Member responding to the LOX RFQ (either as an Initial Respondent
or in exercise of a Secondary Trading Right) shall receive an allocation
equal to a weighted proportion based on the number of contracts bid or
offered by such Member as a percentage of the total quantity of all
contracts bid or offered in response to the LOX RFQ, as the case may be, at
the price accepted by the Initiating Member, provided,  however,

If, as a result of the allocation specified above, an Initial Respondent
acting as a broker would receive less than 50% of the total quantity, then
the LBH instead shall allocate no less than 50% of the total quantity to
such Initial Respondent with the remainder allocated to those exercising
their Secondary Trading Rights based on  the number of contracts bid or
offered by each such Floor Member as a percentage of all contracts bid or
offered pursuant to the exercise of Secondary Trading Rights.

Following execution of the LOX transaction, the LBH will confirm the parties
to the transaction and the quantity allocated to each respondent.

(F) Responsibility for LOX Orders.  A Floor Member shall not be liable for
failure to execute an order as a LOX order unless such order was designated
by the customer as a LOX order.

(G) Impact on Non-LOX Orders.  In no event shall a LOX order elect stop
loss, market-if-touched or other contingency orders, or otherwise affect
orders in the regular non-LOX market.

(H) Closing Period and Post-Close Prohibition.  LOX transactions will
neither be allowed during the closing period nor during the post-close
session for applicable contracts.


Greg

Here is our top 33 on the attached file.  We really should talk about this.  Dave sent me a note suggesting 500 K for Don Black.  Don ranked 18th on our list.  Maybe that's ok.

John


These all look good for our desk.

Errol

Dawn C Kenne@ECT
02/05/2001 10:06 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Natural Gas Risk Books on EOL

Please e-mail me the books that your desk does not use anymore.

Thanks!
Dawn

---------------------- Forwarded by Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 07:55 PM
---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
01/31/2001 04:32 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Natural Gas Risk Books on EOL

Please look over the following and call Dawn with any books that need to be
deleted from their system.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
04:31 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
01/31/2001 04:23 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Natural Gas Risk Books on EOL

Voila!

Finally, a list of the natural gas risk books that EOL has on file.  Please
review the list and let us know which ones are no longer valid books.

Let me know if you need further information. Sorry it took so long to get to
you!

Dawn
3-9353


Whoo hooo!  I just took the demand charge for CALP to $0 for May.  This
affects our demand charges on CGAS.