One day, when I was a freshman in high school, I saw a kid from my
class was walking home from school. His name was Kyle. It looked
like he was carrying all of his books. I thought to myself, "Why would anyone
bring home all his books on a Friday? He must really be a nerd." I had
quite a weekend planned (parties and a football game with my friends
tomorrow (afternoon), so I shrugged my shoulders and went on.

As I was walking, I saw a bunch of kids running toward him. They
ran at him, knocking all his books out of his arms and tripping him
so he landed in the dirt. His glasses went flying, and I saw them land in
the grass about ten feet from him. He looked up and I saw this terrible
sadness in his eyes. My heart went out to him. So, I jogged over
to him and as he crawled around looking for his glasses, I saw a tear
in his eye. As I handed him his glasses, I said, "Those guys are jerks.
They really should get lives." He looked at me and said, Hey thanks!"
There was a big smile on his face. It was one of those smiles that showed real
gratitude. I helped him pick up his books, and asked him where he lived. As
it turned out, he lived near me, so I asked him why I had never seen
him before. He said he had gone to private school before now. I
would have never hung out with a private school kid before. We talked all
the way home, and I carried his books. He turned out to be a pretty cool
kid. I asked him if he wanted to play football on Saturday with my
friends and me. He said yes.

We hung all weekend and the more I got to know Kyle, the more I liked him,
and my friends thought the same of him. Monday morning came, and there
was Kyle with the huge stack of books again. I stopped him and said,
"Boy, you are going to really build some serious muscles with this pile of
books
everyday!" He just laughed and handed me half the books.

Over the next four years, Kyle and I became best friends. When we
were seniors, we began to think about college. Kyle decided on
Georgetown, and I was going to Duke. I knew that we
would always be friends, that the miles would never be a problem. He was going
to be a doctor, and I was going for business on a football scholarship. Kyle
was
valedictorian of our class. I teased him all the time about being a nerd. He
had
to prepare a speech for graduation. I was so glad it wasn't me having
to get up there and speak. Graduation day came, and I saw Kyle.
He looked great. He was one of those guys that really found him during
high school. He filled out and actually looked good in glasses. He
had more dates than I had and all the girls loved him.

Boy, sometimes I was jealous. Today was one of those days. I could see
that he was nervous about his speech. So, I smacked him on the back and
said, "Hey, big guy, you'll be great!" He looked at me with one of those
looks (the really grateful one) and smiled. "Thanks," he said.
As he started his speech, he cleared his throat, and began.
"Graduation is a time to thank those who helped you make it through
those tough years. Your parents, your teachers, your siblings,
maybe a coach, but mostly your friends. I am here to tell all of you
that being a friend to someone is the best gift you can give him or her. I
am going to tell you a story."I just looked at my friend with
disbelief as he told the story of the first day we met. He had planned to kill
himself over the weekend.

He talked of how he had cleaned out his locker so his Mom wouldn't have to do
it later and was carrying his entire stuff home. He looked hard at me and
gave me a little smile. "Thankfully, I was saved. My  friend saved me from
doing the unspeakable." I heard the gasp go through the crowd as this
handsome, popular boy told us all about his weakest moment. I
saw his mom and dad looking at me and smiling that same grateful smile. Not
until that moment did I realize its depth.

Never underestimate the power of your actions. With one small gesture you can
change a person's life. For better or for worse. God puts us all in
each other's lives to impact one another in some way. Look for God
in others.

You now have two choices, you can:

(1) Pass this on to your friends or
(2) Delete it and act like it didn't touch your heart.

As you can see, I took choice number 1. "Friends are angels who
lift us to our feet when our wings have trouble remembering how to fly."
It's National Friendship Week. Show your friends how much you really
care.

Eleanor Roosevelt wrote: "Many people will walk in and out of
your life, but only true friends will leave footprints in your heart."
To handle yourself, use your head; to handle others, use your
heart. Anger is only one letter short of danger. If someone betrays you once,
it is his fault; if he betrays you twice, it is your fault. Great minds
discuss ideas;
Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. He who loses money,
loses much; He, who loses a friend, loses  much more; He, who loses faith,
loses all.
Beautiful young people are accidents of nature, but beautiful old
people are works of art. Learn from the mistakes of others. You can't live
long enough to
make them all yourself. Friends, you and me.... you brought another
friend.... and then there were 3. We started our group.... our circle of
friends.... and like that circle.... there is no beginning or end. Yesterday
is history...
Tomorrow's a mystery. Today is a gift.

It's National Friendship Week. Show your friends how much you
care. Send this to everyone you consider a FRIEND. If
it comes back to you, then you'll know you have a circle of friends.

WHEN YOU RECEIVE THIS LETTER, YOU'RE REQUESTED
TO SEND IT TO AT LEAST 10 PEOPLE, INCLUDING THE PERSON
WHO SENT IT TO YOU.


Was it an actual downgrade or just that they wouldn't agree not to do so?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Say you didn't know that to get hold of the Tim Jones at One America Square
you neede to type Tim R Jones, here's the robust approach:

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Sage/LON/ECT on 24/07/2000 11:01
---------------------------

Leigh Bentley
24/07/2000 09:49
To: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Moore/LON/ECT@ECT, Barry Sangster/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Metals Staff in Lotus notes

I know that Tim Jones is from MG, so he will be found in the ECT Europe
External Address Book. In order to address him, I create a reply or new
message and then click on the Address button. Change the address book from
ECT or Enron to the ECT External Address Book:

At this point I need to skip down to the Jones' in the list, so I just type
jones and a Quick Search dialogue box appears. Click OK and I go to the first
of the Jones' llisted in this address book (Allan I think). It's a reasonably
long list, but only one exists.

He's Tim R Jones, so I click on the 'To:' button to add him to the recipient
list for the message.

This is a good procedure to pass on to others.

Regards
Leigh Bentley
(Enron European Messaging Administration)


stakeholder meetings to discuss draft cong  management package


------------
From:	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Cc:	Purcell, Mike
Subject:	PGE August 2001

Hi Diana-

   Here's that spreadsheet in E-mail form.  Hope this helps.
  Click on the 3rd tab (it should be defaulted there) and it will give you the same detail.

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  Virginia


nice note
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 02/10/2000
06:37 PM ---------------------------

Mary Berg
02/10/2000 10:51 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Ask Why? Campaign

 I have worked for Enron for 8 1/2 years.  For what it is worth, I really
enjoyed the recent "Ode to Why" commercial.  The imagery of past struggles
shown with short video-clips was first class.  When I saw the ad on TV, it
caught my attention and I knew I liked it even before I realized it was an
Enron commercial.  Congratulations on what I believe is the best
advertisement I have seen yet for Enron.

  I read a brief article this morning that you may find of interest.  The
name "Enron" will appear in Microsoft's spell-check dictionary in its Word
2000 release.  Enron is certainly becoming a household name!


Hi Rick. Hope your holding up. We are going to have all of the "on-going concern" activities here in the old building on the 30-31-32 floors. We will be splitting the estate infrastructure into two functions: on-going activities (contracts/assets we will continue to serve and perform under) and wind-up/liquidation activities. Jim Fallon will be managing the latter function and I believe he is staying in the new building for now.

We need to ensure that we have the appropriate folks from RAC engaged in the on-going concern function. I'd prefer that we continue to have them located near our floors vs. move to another location (as I hear through the grapevine). Could you suggest the folks that would be available to focus exclusively on on-going concern activities, and do you want them to stay on the 28th floor or move onto 31 with us?

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 06:40
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/06/2000 06:36 PM
To: theherington@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse 501D5A damaged generator

Hi.

You probably thought that I feel off the end of the world.  Please take a
look at this and give me a call.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 06:34
PM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/06/2000 03:41 PM
To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew
Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank R
Cervenka/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Westinghouse 501D5A damaged generator

john - thanx for your time on phone this afternoon.

a) just received cc of letter from westinghouse.  in it, they assert that:

"title to the existing generator passed to enron upon delivery into the
united states.  delivery occurred at houston on or about 23jul00.  as
required by the contract and incoterms 1990, risk of loss to the generator
passed to enron when the generator arrived (ddp) at houston while the
generator remained on board the common carrier.  the generator was delivered
in an undamaged condition.  title and risk of loss passed to enron before the
water damage to the generator occurred."

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

b) per the contract between enron and westinghouse:

section 15.1.2 title to Equipment - Title to the Equipment will pass to
Purchaser immediately upon entry into the united states.
section 15.2 risk of loss - Seller shall bear the risk of loss and damage
with respect to the Equipment until delivery of the Equipment to the Delivery
Point in accordance with Section 3.2.1.  Seller shall be required to inspect
the Equipment for damage at the Delivery Point.
section 3.2.1 - Seller shall cause the Equipment to be delivered to the
Delivery Point on a DDP basis in accordance with Sections 10.2.1 by the date
set forth therein.
section 3.2.2 - Seller shall be responsible for delivering the CT-Unit DDP to
the: (iii) u.s. port of export by any means of transport.
section 3.2.3 - Seller shall perform customs clearance for the Equipment
through u.s. customs and pay any import duties.
section 10.2.1 Guaranteed Unit Delivery Date - Seller will cause the CT-Unit
(author's note - includes the generator) to be delivered in an undamaged
condition in accordance with the Specification-CT to the Delivery Point (DDP)
in accordance with Schedule I below (the Guaranteed Unit Delivery Date).
(author's note - the date specified in the contract was later slipped per
agreement with enron).
section 10.2.3 Completion of Delivery - delivery of the CT-Unit to the
Delivery Point shall be considered complete for the purposes of Delivery
Liquidated Damages as it pertains to the delivery of Major Components
(author's note - includes the GT and generator) when the last Major Component
of such CT-Unit is delivered DDP to the Delivery Point in complete and
undamaged condition.  ...  Purchaser shall have the right to inspect the
Equipment for condition of the Equipment upon actual delivery.  Purchaser
reserves the right to reject damaged Equipment at any location; however, in
the event a portion of the Equipment is damaged or defective upon delivery to
the Delivery Point, Purchaser after making an initial assessment of the
damage or defect and consulting with Seller as to how such damage will affect
the installation , operation, performance, reliability, efficiency, and
warranty of the damaged Equipment may either:
(i) reasonable determine that such damage or defect is such that the
preceding criteria is so adversely affected that Purchaser cannot accept
delivery of the damaged Equipment and declare that delivery has not occurred,
or
(ii) after taking into account such criteria and Seller's proposed plan for
correcting such damage or defect in accordance with Section 9.5, declare that
delivery has occurred: in the event Purchaser discovers such a damage or
defect, it shall notify Seller of such as soon as practical.

c) facts of the case, as we know them:

common carrier ship carrying the generator supposedly arrived in port of
houston approx. 14jul00.  i.e., that was the ship's estimated time of arrival
(eta).
westinghouse is claiming that delivery occurred on or about 23jul00.
enron representative (frank cervenka) went to CTSS (i.e., the westinghouse
facility here in houston) on friday, 21jul00 to inspect the combustion
turbine.  during that inspection, westinghouse employees informed him that
the generator had salt water damage at the port.  as a result, the following
monday, 24jul00, he visited the port of houston with the siemens-westinghouse
insurance adjustor and saw the damaged generator.  note - this was just a
cursory visit to verify that in fact the unit had been damaged.  the full
extent of the damage and impact on the project was not known at that time -
e.g., repair or replace were still viable options.
enron received formal notification (faxed letter) of the damaged generator on
approx. 18aug00.
enron has already made progress payments to siemens-westinghouse in the
amount of 95% of the contract value of the gas turbine and generator.
DDP, per incoterms 1990, means delivered duty paid.
Westinghouse, despite 2 prior requests from enron, has not provided copies of
the customs clearance documentation.  i.e., we don't know the exact date that
the generator cleared customs, or if it cleared customs.
title means ownership, but does not imply either risk of loss or care,
custody, and control.  with title comes both ownership and the responsibility
for payment of taxes.

d) info not known by enron:

when did ship come into port?
when did damage to generator occur?
when, or if, u.s. customs duties were paid?

f) info known by enron:

generator is a total loss, as determined by westinghouse.
per section 10.2.3 of contract, enron was not given the formal opportunity to
inspect the damaged generator until a month after it arrived in port.  as
recalled by matt tezyk, westinghouse was then advised by enron in writing
that the generator was rejected and that delivery had not occurred.
(author's note - matt to find cc of that letter).

g) enron's assertions are that:

DDP was not satisfied.  i.e., delivery of the generator did not occur in
accordance with the terms of the contract.
title (i.e., ownership) remains with siemens-westinghouse.
risk of loss remains with siemens-westinghouse.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

john - plz assess the copy of the contract provided to you this afternoon
under separate cover.  we request a legal opinion as to whether delivery, in
accordance with the contract, of the CT-Unit occurred or not.  plz call with
any questions.  regards.  scott.


In case you haven't already marked your calendars, tomorrow will be my two
year anniversary with the company.   The good Lord willing (and with Stan's
and Mike's continued acquiescence) I may even surpass the tenure of my two
most recent and very illustrious predecessors.  Given your meteoric career
tracks, however, I'm not sure you guys would view that as a huge
accomplishment.  Hope all goes well with you both.  Adios from the big O.
DF


Find attached the EGM Management Summary and Hot List as of 4/20.  Please contact me if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Patricia
Sent:	Monday, April 23, 2001 8:26 AM
To:	Smith, Jeff E.
Subject:	4/20 Mgmt Summary & Hot List

For distribution.

Thanks,
Patricia


Kevin I have a call into Wendy Lebroc ( 713.853.3835 ) in your credit
department explaining that Enron trades Dawn as Enron North America not
Enron Canada - awaiting a call back from her.  Just wondering if you had
heard from her as to what was going with us being able to trade Dawn on
EOL...

Bruce Potter
317.231.6864


Claire:
Please include me in on the Volleyball Tourney this Friday. Thanks!
Ben


Sara -

I am checking internally if we can agree to the below.  I will get back to
you in the beginning of next week.

Regards,
Michelle

Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM
To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com
Cc: Marie.Heard@enron.com
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Michelle:

With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff
for your non-regulated affiliates.  Perhaps you could provide us with the
regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out.  I look forward to hearing from
you.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm
arkets+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara
   Cc:     Heard, Marie
   Subject:  ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline
   incorporating
   the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of ISDA
   (modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions).  The attached is
   the
   last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would
   suggest
   that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of agreement
   since it is the final version.

    <<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>>

   Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at
   which
   point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature
   page)
   via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the
   Schedule with your revised Schedule.

   Thank you for your patience.

   Regards,
   Michelle

    - ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED
   9.26.01.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Vince-

I know you're very busy, so you might not have heard this ...

Apparently, the Board will meet this week to approve the sale of *all* of
Enron International's assets to a member of hte Saudi royal family, the same
Prince who once invested heavily in Citicorp to bail it out.

The source of this is someone I trust.

Clayton


Attached is some more humor based on California events

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - January16humor.DOC


Please approve my authorization request for control over daily and monthly
basis products on enrononline.
I will need these products available for management on my stack manager. I
currently cannot access basis products on my stack manager.  They were
removed to facilitate timely messaging updates between my stack and the
website.
I will be managing monthly and daily  basis products for the East Desk.   I
will also be retaining my management of gas daily products for the east desk.
I will be managing these products as of 10/2/2000.

Please call id there anre any problems

Peter Keavey

713-853-7277


Per your request, please find attached a memorandum in draft form
addressing the status of Offshore Services Day Rate Derivative Products.

Take care.

(See attached file: M. Taylor Memo.doc)
 - M. Taylor Memo.doc


Jeff and Ben:
Here are some more questions regarding the Caledonia and Brownsville plants.
Your assistance with these questions would be greatly appreciated.  Please
send your answers back to me when completed.  Again, thank you for your help.
Regards,
Ben
3-7998
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
10:30 AM ---------------------------

Don Miller
12/04/2000 10:11 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Question 2

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 10:10 AM
---------------------------

"Tang, David" <dtang@Cinergy.com> on 11/30/2000 07:45:51 PM
To: "'don.miller@enron.com'" <don.miller@enron.com>
cc: "Whitehead, Robert" <rwhitehead@Cinergy.com>, "Hoyos, Sergio"
<sergio.hoyos@cinergy.com>, "Chaney, Tom" <tchaney@Cinergy.com>, "Vivar, Art"
<avivar@Cinergy.com>
Subject: Question 2

More Questions:

Both Plants

1.  What are the short term NOx and CO emissions during startups, and are
there limitations during start-ups.

2.  Are industrial stormwater permits required at either site?

Caledonia

3.  In Caledonia, what is the custom fuel sampling schedule?

Brownsville

4.  What is the agency's response to the Enron letter regarding the 2nd
stormwater NOV?

5.  Has there been any further action by the agency since the 1st stormwater
NOV was never responded to?

6.  One memo stated that the stormwater is channeled to a wetland.  Was that
during construction only or is it ongoing?

7.  Were there any further problems with the B T Readymix concrete dumping
issue?


Dear Faculty,

On Jan. 31, the new web-based faculty reporting system -- developed to
provide a mechanism for faculty members to file electronic annual reports to
the Dean while also updating their Jones School web pages -- will be
launched. This system will allow you and/or your staff assistants to 1) file
annual report to the Dean; 2) maintain individual faculty web pages; 3)
output entries into downloadable Rich Text Format, so that entries into the
system can be used to update CV's.

Although the system is designed for ease of use, you are invited to join
staff at the training session from 2:15 to 3:45 p.m., on Thursday, Jan. 31
in Rm. 101. Staff assistants will be trained to use the system in order to
provide you with assistance if you need it. The session will provide a
walkthrough about how to use the system, make, change, and save entries for
the annual report to the Dean.

Attached is a detailed user's manual in MS Word and Acrobat PDF for your
records. On Jan. 31, we will send you another e-mail with the site admin web
address and instructions to log in so that you may begin using the system.

Many thanks,

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Maileen Hamto
Assistant Director of Public Relations
Jones Graduate School of Management - MS 531
Rice University
P.O Box 1892
Houston, TX 77251
Ph: 713-348-6364
Web: http://jonesgsm.rice.edu
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 - Faculty_System_User_Guide.doc
 - Faculty_System_User_Guide.pdf


Gentlemen,

West Services is short 19mw around-the-clock on Sunday and light-load Monday (7/1-7/2), as well as 23mw on-peak Monday (7/2).  We are short in SP15, at $80 on-peak and $64.25 off-peak.  We would like to either purchase the power through an SC to SC trade, or go against the ISO Imbalance, depending upon market conditions.  The associated enpower deal #'s are 669407, 669596, and 669752.  I will call in on Saturday evening to discuss market conditions and to make a decision on what needs to be done.

Thanks,
Stan


Stuart -

Attached are the chain of e-mails on the agreement.  I recommend a direct
red-line between the two agreements (what I sent them, and what they sent
back) before we mark up their letter.

They understand what we are doing with the plants, and I don't think will
have a problem with the changes we discussed.  I don't yet know what their
response to Brownsville will be however.

After you review the attached give me a call to discuss.

Mitch

Kay Mann
11/27/2000 10:14 AM
To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, davidlu@nepco.com
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Hi there,

In resolving some issues with Westinghouse there was an agreement reached
concerning the disposition of the Blue Girl turbines, as well as certain
issues relating to the Gleason and Wheatland facilities.  In connection with
this agreement I am forwarding to you a draft letter agreement concerning
resolution of these matters.  As you can see, Westinghouse has requested that
NEPCO, EEPC and LJM2-Turbine, LLC sign the agreement.

Your comments would be appreciated.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/22/2000 09:09 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Some changes.  Can you review and advise?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKray@swpc.siemens.com> on 11/21/2000 10:42:05 AM
To: "'Mitch.Robinson@enron.com'" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Mitch
Attached are SWPC revisions to your proposed letter. Our contracts group
advised to add signatures for all affected parties to the agreement, in
addition to know parties for contracts on Gleason and Wheatland sites, we
have added parties identified in draft Blue Girl contract, Enron input as to
appropriate Enron signatures for the Blue Girl would be appreciated.  Please
call with any concerns.

Regards
Lynn DeKrey
407 736 2823
 <<Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc>>

 - Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 08:16 AM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse

I talked with Westinghouse this morning.  They have some minor changes to the
agreement.  They'll have the changes back this afternoon.  If the changes
reflect what they described on the phone, then we'll be ready to sign
tomorrow morning.

Mike, are you in tomorrow to sign?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
12:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 11:01 AM

To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Westinghouse

Thanks Mike.  SWPC said they want to add the words "or any subsidiary of
Enron" to the part that says we won't bill them anymore invoices.  Their
concern is that there are current invoices out there, but they are from
NEPCO, not from me.

I'm comfortable with this, but at some point, EE&CC/NEPCO/EES will likely
want us to pay for these then.  The amount is approximately the same as the
amount we (EE&CC and ENA) owe SWPC for out-of-scope charges.

I'll just get Kevin to sign the letter.

Thanks,

Mitch

Mike J Miller@ECT
11/16/2000 10:38 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Westinghouse

I'm leaving by noon today and flying to London for vacation.  Will not be
back until Monday, November 26.  This e-mail serves as my approval of the
Westinghouse letter as i have reviewed the latest draft and am in full
agreement with the terms and conditions of the settlement.  I believe Jeff
Donahue will be around, Don Miller can help you run this by him and get his
signoff.

Regards,

Mike J Miller

+
	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/13/2000 10:55 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Westinghouse letters

Thanks Kay.  I'll forward them on the Westinghouse by e-mail first.

Mitch

Kay Mann
11/13/2000 10:47 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse letters

Hi Mitch,

My suggested changes are highlighted.

Please let me know what else I can do.

Kay


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/27/2000 04:43 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ravi
Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Joe Hirko/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Griebling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Off-site: John Griebling's organization and Research Group

Jeff,

I would like to invite you to an off-site meeting of John Griebling's
organization
and the Research Group.

Date:   April 27 - April 29
Location:  Breckenridge, Colorado

As you know, John Griebling is managing the network design and construction
project
currently under way in EBS. The Research Group is actively involved in this
effort
which requires advanced quantitative skills in the area of stochastic
optimization and
stochastic processes (for modeling and forecasting Internet traffic flows).

The objective of this meeting is to develop common language and accomplish
transfer
of skills between the two groups, to facilitate cooperation on this project
in the future.

We are also inviting to this off-site senior management of EBS and plan to
have
on the agenda several presentations about strategic directions of EBS. The
effort
of network design and construction currently under way is  unprecedented in
terms
of its scope and complexity and it is important  for technical people, who
often have
highly specialized technical skills, to understand the broad picture.

I would appreciate if you could join us for Friday afternoon (April 28) and
Saturday (April 29). I understand  that you have commitments on Thursday and
Friday
morning. We have reorganized the tentative agenda of the meeting to devote
Friday afternoon to more general topics.

Vince


how was dallas?  any good stories?  did you get married to your babe?


CRENSHAW,SHIRLEY J   has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  Your may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on CRENSHAW,SHIRLEY J   until you have
approved the list.


Shirley,

Please, review this trip with me.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000
10:19 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rob Wilson @ ENRON                           03/16/2000 02:34 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NE Gov. Johanns mtg

Vince, FYI on Nebraska , this note I recently sent to Maureen.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Wilson/ET&S/Enron on 03/16/2000 02:31
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Rob Wilson                           03/07/2000 03:19 PM

To: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beth Jensen/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dee
Svatos/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Virginia
O'Neill/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: NE Gov. Johanns mtg

Maureen,
The  Energy CEO Roundtable hosted by Gov. Johanns has been scheduled for
April 20th 10a.m. -2 p. m. Does this date work for you?  As we have
discussed, your presentation would provide the Governor and his guests with a
national/ global perspective on pricing trends for natural gas , electricity
and oil and their impact on agricultural production costs. We may also
include a hedging presentation, but have not committed to do so yet.
 Your presentation would be scheduled at the start of the meeting, w/ an
anticipated length of twenty minutes.  A University of NE  ag economist will
provide a state perspective for the group. Following the conclusion of both
presentations time would be allotted for questions. We expect approximately
20 people to attend the roundtable.


Robin, please load the attached EES Volumetric Position Report Monday morning
and give me a call with the positions.  The report shows our position as of
7/28/2000.  I expect our position to be about 349 contracts for Nymex and
<1,137> nominal contracts for Basis.

Thanks,
Monica
x3-5070


It is my understanding that Rob and Teb will be the "pilots" on this answer and us old "pilots" will be "co-pilots"-  let me know if this isn't correct- as we aren't asking for the answers to the Ordered questions.   MK


A Media Advisory regarding the proposed Rio Linda  Power Plant Project has
been placed online at:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2001_releases/2001-05-09_riolinda.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For immediate release:  May 9, 2001

Contact: Claudia Chandler (916)654-4989

Energy Commission Schedules Informational Hearing and Site Visit to Proposed
Rio Linda Power Project

Sacramento  On Wednessday, May 16, 2001, members of the public and other
interested parties will have an opportunity to learn more about the proposed
Rio Linda Power Project, a 560-megawatt power plant proposed by FPL Energy
Sacramento Power, LLC.

If approved, the Rio Linda Power Project would be
located`on`a`ypmacre`site`in`the`community`of Rio Linda, in Sacramento
County, approximately seven miles east of Sacramento International Airport.
The proposed project would be a natural gas-fired, combined cycle facility.

What:  Informational Hearing and Site Visit

Who:  The hearing is an open meeting where interested members of the public
are welcome to participate and ask questions about the project.

When:  WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2001
  Informational Hearing will begin at 6 p.m.
  Site visit to follow

Where: Rio Linda Community United Methodist Church
  Church Sanctuary
  6800 6th Street (corner of 6th and M Streets)
  Rio Linda, CA
  (Wheelchair Accessible)

Bus transportation to the site will leave from the hearing location at 6:30
p.m. Land owners, members of the general public, and governmental agencies
are invited to participate in this tour.  On Thursday, May 17, 2001,
Commission staff will conduct a Data Request Workshop and a more extensive
site visit of the linear facilities.

Reservations to participate in the tour and workshop should be made through
the Energy Commission's Public Adviser's Office at (916) 654-4489, (800)
822-6228 or by e-mail at: <pao@energy.state.ca.us>.

For information regarding public participation, contact the Commission's
Public Adviser, Roberta Mendonca.  The Public Adviser will be present to
explain the Commission's certification process and assist those interested in
participating.

Information concerning the status of the Rio Linda Power Project, as well as
notices and other relevant documents, is also available on the Energy
Commission's Internet web site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/riolinda

 # # #

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
If you would like to un-subscribe from this
mailing list, please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/html/listservers.html

Web Development Team
California Energy Commission
1516 Ninth Street, MS-29
Sacramento, CA 95814

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Samantha Mickelson


Has this been addressed?

Brenda H Fletcher
03/27/2000 11:53 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CGAS K# 39764 - Deal #77349

The invoiced rate on this contract is for  interruptible gathering but the
information on the deal reflects a Firm contract. How do you suggest handling
so the contract type, rate schedule and firmness are consistent with the
pipeline?

Also, there are 10 contracts that we were invoiced for processing charges
that are not on the Service List in Path Manager for Feb.
Are you working on getting contracts and deals added?

Thanks,
Brenda


<<Alfred W..html>>

 - Alfred W..html


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicoll, Kenny
Sent: 27 November 2001 17:48
To: Jordan, Mike
Subject: landscaped - dilbert


Hi!

Matt is over until 300, Paige is off with Abbey, and I'm waiting for a
conference call to start.

How many places should I set at the table tomorrow?

ckm


Take a look at this.  A good friend of mine runs the pro bono C-Bar service.  She was recently named by the Texas Lawyer as one of the 40 best lawyers in the state under the age of 40.  More details below.  Read the e-mail.  Know anyone at Enron who would be interested?

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: "Heather Way" <hway@lact.org>@ENRON
Sent: Mon 10/22/2001 4:54 PM
To: Edison, Andrew
Cc:
Subject: RE: follow up

Hi Andy. Thank you for the very nice message. All is very well in

Austin. How's Houston and the horse? Hope we can get down to Houston

soon. Have you gotten to meet Ella yet?

By the way, I finally got to make a C-BAR presentation to Bracewell in

Houston, which Marcy organizated, and the firm is now actively involved.

I really like Marcy--she is very cool.  Your message reminded me of

ENRON and how I have sent a couple of unanswered messages to Jim Derrick

at the recommendation of Scott Atlas to see if we can get get Enron

attorneys involved and/or to get an Enron attorney to serve on our

Houston advisory board. I believe Scott said he had talked to Jim about

2 years ago about getting Enron to partner with V&E attorneys on

transactional pro bono matters. Scott said Jim sounded interested and

suggested I contact him as well. What is the current status of pro bono

there? We work very closely with V&E and are still very interested in

the partnership model.   Attached is additional info for corporate

counsel and the role they can play in C-BAR.

On the advisory board front, we are currently looking for transactional

attorneys to serve on a new Houston advisory board for C-BAR as well as

a newly restructured statewide operating board.  Would love to have an

Enron attorney serve on one of the boards.  The quick and easy low down

is that the advisory board is a very minimal commitment with 1-2

meetings a year in Houston, and the operating board will serve as a more

traditional operating board, with 4 meetings a year.  More info is

below.

Any recommendations of Enron attorneys??  Here's more background on

C-BAR and the boards:

Texas Community Building with Attorney Resources ("Texas C-BAR") is a

statewide pro bono initiative for corporate counsel and other business

law/transactional attorneys. The mission of our organization is

two-fold: (1) Empower low income people and strengthen low income

neighborhoods in Texas by providing pro bono legal services to

community-based nonprofits in Texas that serve low income individuals

and communities, with an emphasis on affordable housing development

activities; and (2) Provide attorneys who have specialized transactional

skills with increased opportunities to apply these skills to benefit low

income communities.

Since Texas C-BAR was founded in 2000, Legal Aid of Central Texas has

been our sponsoring organization, but Texas C-BAR is a statewide project

and operates with an independent advisory board.  Now that Texas C-BAR

has gotten off the ground, we are working on building 3 regional

advisory boards as well as a new statewide operating board to help us

build on our first-year successes and explore ways to expand our pro

bono opportunities for transactional lawyers.  Serving on the board of

C-BAR offers attorneys the opportunity to be part of an exciting,

innovative project.  As the only statewide business law project in

Texas, attorneys who serve on our boards will be able to play an

influential role in the future of business law pro bono and have a

long-term, positive impact on low income neighborhoods throughout the

state. Information about the duties of these boards follows:

        Operating Board

        A.      Expectations:

                1.      3-year staggered terms; maximum of 2 terms

                2.      Serve on at least one committee (executive

committee, development, nominations, outreach)

                3.      Attend board meetings (quarterly meetings)

                4.      Participate in special events for C-BAR

                5.      Public Relations: be an advocate for the

organization in the community

                6.      Fundraising****

                        a.      actively participate in C-BAR

fundraising activities

                        b.      personally support C-BAR (cash and

in-kind)

                        c.      identify and cultivate potential donors

                7.      Assume leadership roles in board activities

including fundraising

                8.      Guide the development of C-BAR

policies/strategic planning

        B.      Legal Duties: none at this time (since C-BAR is a

project of Legal Aid of Central Texas, which has its own operating

board)

        Regional Advisory Boards:

        A.      Three regions: Houston, Dallas-FW, Central Texas

(Austin-SA)

        B.      Expectations:

                1.      3-year staggered terms

                2.      Attend 1-2 advisory board meetings a year in the

region

                3.      Public Relations: be an advocate for the

organization in the community

                4.      Fundraising: assist with the fundraising

activities of the operating board, as requested

                5.      Assist with outreach to attorneys/nonprofits

                6.      Advise operating board and staff on development

of programming and policy direction

-----Original Message-----

From: Edison, Andrew [<mailto:Andrew.Edison@ENRON.com>]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:12 AM

To: Heather Way

Subject:

Heather -

I just heard that the Texas Lawyer listed you as one of the top 40

lawyers in the state under the age of 40.  Although I have not seen or

read the article,  that is a terrific accomplishment.  Congratulations.

The work you do provides an incredible service to the community and you

deserve all the accolades.

Hope all is well in Austin.  Please give my best to Bill.

Andy

**********************************************************************

This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of

the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure

by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient

(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender

or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and

delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments

hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not

create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron

Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other

party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by

estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************

 - communitycounsel.corps.wpd <<communitycounsel.corps.wpd>>


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Review LFT Requirements in conference room 4102/Gerry Medeles/ attendees:  Sheila N., Jan M., John B., Steve J., Mary /Draemer

Date:		9/26/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


How old is Laura child?


THIRD request!  Many of you haven't granted calendar access rights to our Legal Dept. Temporary IDs.  The temporaries that fill in for our Assistants need this access not only to set up meetings and keep your calendars current, but to refer to in case there's an emergency and you need to be found.

Assistants:  It is helpful if you block the time on your bosses' calendars for their vacations and trips.  That way when we call up the calendars the temps won't have to guess how to answer their calls.   ("I don't know where they are" is not an acceptable answer!)

Please follow the instructions below.

For Outlook users only!

Since we have migrated to Outlook, we have not been able to give calendar/e-mail access to the temporaries filling in for our department.  Apparently, the access rights we all had set up in Lotus Notes cannot be migrated to Outlook.  Thus, we need all attorneys and specialists to give access rights to all the department Temporary IDs as soon as possible.  You can control how much access you would like to give, and for what.  For example, you could give full revision access to your calendar and read-only for your e-mail or access only to your calendar and no access to your e-mail.  It's up to you.

Please give access to the following IDs:
EWS Legal Temp 1
EWS Legal Temp 2
EWS Legal Temp 3
EWS Legal Temp 4
EWS Legal Temp 5
EWS Legal Temp 6
Note:  Do not use-Temp 7 is not designated for our temporaries.
EWS Legal Temp 8

To set up access:
1.	Right click on "Outlook Today" at the top of the folders list (if your folders list is not visible, click on "View" and
	then "Folder List")

2.	Left Click on "Properties" at the bottom of the list that pops up

3.	Left click on the "Permissions" tab

4.	Left click on "Add".
	Type "EWS"-the address list will stop on our temp IDs.
	Left click on one of the Temp ID you are adding, left click on the "Add" button.  Repeat for each ID.  (Be careful not
	to add EWS Temp ID 7.  This is not used for our temporaries.)
	Left Click "OK"

5. 	You should now be back in the "properties" box.  Select the first ID you just added, hold down the "Shift" key, then
	left click all the other ID's.  With all IDs now selected and not holding the Shift key down, click in the boxes which
	access you would like to allow the temporaries to have.  (Note:  Do not select anything that has "own" or "owner"
	in it as you are the owner.)  Left Click on "Apply", then "OK".

6.	Right click on your "Calendar" folder and repeat steps 2-5 above.

7.	[Optional].  To give access to e-mail or any other folders you may have, right click on that folder and repeat steps
	 2-5 above.

Regarding the Legal Temp IDs, these set-up instructions need to be completed only once. If your Assistant ever changes, these instructions will come in handy!
Thank you for your time and patience.


Thanks for the info Heidi.  It's always good to have a second pair of eyes
with all these wells.  I have done some research and all but  one are HPLC
deals and were not putting those on the gathering contract.  I'll run this by
Daren and make the changes if needed.  Please let me know if you see anything
else it just takes a minute to check on it.


Please, use a new template stored in the   Plans2001   folder
for today's project lists.

Over the last few weeks we had several parallel
copies of the same file floating around.

I have updated he list of group members in the first sheet.
Please, make sure I have not  omitted anybody.

Vince

O:\Research\Common\FROM_WJK\PLANS\2001Plans


Attached you will find a list of UT alumni from the GIS system.  Please look
it over and let me know if there are any alumni that you feel should be added
to our UT team.  The information in this spreadsheet is taken directly from
GIS, so it should be fairly accurate and complete.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions.

Thank you for your help.

Have a great day!

Lexi


sharon block
1003 smith grade rd
santa cruz, CA 95060
sharon@iwearart.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

sharon block


More info.  Apparently, all's not necessarily roses here.  The main issue
Enron has with the FERC order is the bifurcated (two-tiered) auction
program.  If the auction bids are less than $150/MW, they are presumed to be
market clearing.  If above $150, they must show cost basis to support the
price.  For purposes of this analysis, "costs" will not include purchase
costs (ie. wholesale price paid), rather, they must be generation costs.

Enron is considering what forum would be appropriate to address the
deficiency of the FERC order.  It is a contentious issue on all sides and
there's likely to be vigorous debate.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 12/18/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
12/18/2000 09:41 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine M.
Lindberg, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FERC restructures Cal-ISO

FERC's action here appears to be the appropriate remedy.  You know it's a
good fix if the utilities and Senator Feinstein don't like it!

FERC Restructures California Power Market
Responding to a California power market gone haywire and teetering on the
brink of operational and financial disaster, FERC Friday issued a series of
remedial measures, virtually stripping the Cal-PX and Cal-ISO of their
control of the market and calling market stakeholders together to negotiate
bilateral forward contracts.
The Commission's main action, effective with the issuance of the order after
the Friday afternoon meeting, removes the requirement that California
utilities buy and sell exclusively through the California Power Exchange
(Cal-PX) and clears the way for bi-lateral contracts in the forward market.
FERC scheduled a settlement conference for Dec. 19 in Washington of parties
in the state's power market to negotiate those contracts.
"California does [not] have the benefit of a competitive market," Chairman
James Hoecker said, noting he had heard the state's power market called
"crisis by design." The design was "an unworkable state law, the product of
command and control that described in detail" exactly how the market should
function. "It wasn't competition," Hoecker said. "It's time to get serious
about saving the future of competitive markets...Competition did not fail in
principle at either the wholesale or retail level because it was never
well-conceived or tried. This version of competition was a disaster."
Commissioner William Massey defended the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's backing away from price caps.  "Rather than cap the spot market
created by the state of California, the order would simply shrink its size
and diminish its influence." This will "give back participants' ability to
find the right price; This ability is what California has taken away from
that market."
Massey said the action would allow bilateral transactions, support forward
contracts, and allow the parties to manage risk.  He urged the California
Public Utilities Commission to "step up to its responsibilities" in
supporting the FERC-directed activities.
Massey said the transfer of wealth in what he described as the "apocalypse"
in California "is absolutely staggering. The two largest utilities are
virtually bankrupt."  He predicted a court, acting on accepted law and
precedent, would eventually rule the utilities are entitled to recover the
costs from customers, spreading the costs out over the entire state.
PG&E Corp. officials lambasted the Commission's actions, saying they left
California's electric customers "exposed to price gouging and future electric
supply reliability uncertainty."
"The California wholesale market is broken. And we are extremely disappointed
by the insufficiency of today's FERC order," PG&E officials said in a
statement. "The remedies outlined in the order do not go nearly far enough to
provide a solution that ensures reliability of the state's electric supply
and equally importantly, provides relief from future price gouging," the
Northern California utility company said. PG&E said it was particularly
disappointed that FERC did not call for retroactive price refunds for
California electric customers, as was requested by Gov. Gray Davis. The
utility also said it was "especially troubled" that FERC shortened the
timeframe for the electric price cap from the end of 2002 to April 2001,
"leaving customers exposed during the high-demand summer season."
Sen Dianne Feinstein, (D-CA), said FERC's action was unacceptable. "Rome is
burning, our utilities are close to bankruptcy, Californians are facing major
blackouts, and the Commission is fiddling."
Hoecker said similar competitive problems in states in the Pacific Northwest
have led to pleas from governors and others for regional price caps. But he
pointed to the fact that FERC is severely limited in what it can do in that
region. For one, it lacks authority over the Bonneville Power Authority and
other federal operations there, which make up a major portion of the market.
Further, there is no Northwest spot market that can be capped in the way caps
operate in California. There also would be problems with the many purchasers
who already had hedged or protected themselves in some way. Hoecker strongly
urged Energy Secretary Bill Richardson to convene a conference to try to
identify regional problems, and offered his help in this.
Commissioners Curt Hebert and Massey said they would issue concurring
opinions. Hoecker said he will submit a concurring opinion next week on items
such as RTOs that are beyond the scope of the order. The Commission's
actions, which went beyond recommendations it had made earlier (see Daily
GPI, Nov. 2), came at an emergency meeting following a week of continuous
power alerts and emergency measures to avoid rolling blackouts in the state.
The Commission's reforms call for:
_ No retroactive refunds for California customers;
_ Elimination of the requirement that California's three investor-owned
utilities --- Pacific Gas and Electric, San Diego Gas and Electric and
Southern California Edison --- sell all of their power into the Cal-PX, and
buy all of their power from the Cal-PX. This took effect Friday;
_ Return 25,000 MW of generation to state regulation;
_ Termination of the Cal-PX wholesale rate schedule effective the close of
the trading day on April 30, 2001;
_ Create a benchmark price for wholesale bilateral contracts to assess prices
of five-year energy supply contracts;
_ Create penalties for underscheduling power loads;
_ A requirement that market participants schedule 95% of their load prior to
real time. Violators will incur penalties for scheduling deviations exceeding
the greater of 10 MW or 5% of their hourly load;
_ Begin market monitoring and price mitigation for the Cal-ISO and PX spot
markets. FERC will hold a technical conference to develop a monitoring an
mitigation program. A proposed plan is to be submitted by March 1 so that the
measure can be in place by May 1;
_ A single-priced auction to be used only for bids at or below $150/MW. Bids
above $150/MW will not set the market clearing price, although they will be
subject to FERC reporting requirements;
_ Replacing the current Cal-ISO stakeholder governing board with a
non-stakeholder board. On Jan. 29, 2001, the Cal-ISO governing board members
will be required to turn over their decision-making power and operating
control to the management of the Cal-ISO. The members will be permitted to
function in an advisory capacity until the new board is selected. FERC to
discuss with California representatives a process for selecting new Cal-ISO
board members; and
_ Modify interconnection procedures.  The ISO and utilities must file
generation interconnection procedures.


I don't know if you guys can pull up my file from the previous email.  Here it is again just in case.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vos, Theresa
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 11:12 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Herrmann, Karen
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

can you also add Karen Herrmann to the distribution?  She handles most of the day-to-day accounting.

thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 11:11 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy; Vos, Theresa
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Opps.  Would help if I included Theresa.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 29, 2002 11:08 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/30/02 at $3.24, that wraps up the sales for April 2002.

Theresa, I've attached my worksheet showing how much we sold TXU for April and what price.  The daily volumes are in column M and the daily prices are in column N.  We should bill TXU for 301,000 dth and a dollar amount of $952,055.00.  Call me if you have any questions.

Thanks

 << File: MARGAS.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Friday, April 26, 2002 1:39 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/27-29/02 at $3.05.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:53 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/26//02 at $3.24

Also received a call from Jeff at Lone Star telling us to work a little harder at working off the imbalance.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:22 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,.000 dth of Conger gas to TXU for 4/25 at $3.29

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

We sold 10,000 dth of the Conger gas to TXU for 4/24 at $3.40

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 1:16 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

OK, Kathy and Troy have pointed out how bad my previous email was.  I'm sure I was thinking about lunch.

Sabra Dinari scheduled the gas on Lone Start.  She quit on Friday.  I will be doing the scheduling until further notice.  Kathy Kelly will be my backup when I'm out.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, April 22, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Kelly, Katherine L.; Mazowita, Mike; Greif, Donna; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick; Vos, Theresa; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE: Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold 10,000 dth of Conger to TXU  for 4/23 at $3.37

Our scheduler, Sabra Dinari, quit on Friday so I will be handling the noms for awhile and Kathy Kelly will.  I think its easier for me to do the noms on this since I'm selling point specific gas and we are not putting this activity in Sitar/Unify.

Theresa, looks like I will be the one addressing the accounting questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Katherine L.
Sent:	Friday, April 19, 2002 8:28 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy
Subject:	Sales to TXU for April 2002

I've sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.14 for Sat.4/20 through Mon. 4/22

Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:24 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.; Denetsosie, Troy
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	RE: Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold TXU 15,000 dth at $3.315 for Fri 4/19/02.

Sabra, I sold them 10,000 of Conger gas and 5,000 of the Sprayberry.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:20 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Hill, Garrick
Subject:	Lone Star Sales to TXU for April 2002

Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.17 for Thur 4/18/02.  I checked on the price with Darren Farmer at AEP and he said that's where Waha was trading so I don't feel like we are being taken advantage of too much.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:12 AM
To:	Mazowita, Mike; Kelly, Katherine L.; Dinari, Sabra L.
Cc:	Germany, Chris; Hill, Garrick
Subject:	Lone Star sales for Wed 4/17/02

Sold TXU 10,000 dth at $3.27 for Wednesday 4/17/02.


Jeff:
Now that Principal Subs has been taken out of the cross default provision,
is there any need to refer to Subsidiaries in the definitions of Debt  or
Permitted Receivables Purchase Facility ?

Carol St. Clair
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


I have forwarded your resume to Ted Bland.  He will be your contact person.
Thanks for your interest.

"Louis Riley" <louisriley@houston.rr.com> on 10/18/2000 01:43:23 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Louis Riley Resume to Jeff Shankman

Dear Mr. Shankman,
?
Thank you for your time today.?
?
I faxed you my resume as you suggested.
?
Here is an electronic copy as well.
?
Sincerely,
?
?
Louis Riley
 - Louis Riley Cover Letter and Resume to Mr. Jeffrey Shankman 10.18.00.doc


Lance.

Perfect.

Vince

Lance Cunningham@ENRON on 11/13/2000 10:06:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Attend PSERC seminar on 11/30 and 12/1

Vince,

I WILL be able to attend the PSERC seminar on Nov. 30 and Dec. 1.  I also
picked up some additional information from UT concerning PSERC this past
weekend while I was in Austin .


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Industrial Markets
The Transaction Development group (TD) is responsible for corporate development, transaction execution and portfolio management activities within EIM.  TD is responsible for asset and corporate acquisitions to support EIM's efforts in the Forest Products and Steel industries.  TD works with EIM's Forest Products and Steel Origination groups to structure and execute complex transactions for EIM's customers.  TD also manages EIM's equity investments, such as EIM's ownership position in Papier Masson, Ltee, a paper mill in Quebec, Canada.

TD is comprised of approximately 20 professionals with a wide range of backgrounds including investment banking, commercial banking, management consulting, law, project development, accounting and engineering.  In addition, the majority of the analysts and associates within EIM work in TD since it provides a strong base of deal experience for junior members of our organization.

Enron Freight Markets
Enron Freight Markets has continued to expand the transportation services offered to its customers and completed several flatbed truck moves outbound from Georgia this week.  There was a shortage of flatbed equipment supply in this market and EFM was able to obtain more than three times the normal margin on each move.

IN THE NEWS

"Enron's bilateral internet trading platform, EnronOnline, was launched in November 1999 and is the largest e-commerce site on the planet based on the value of its transactions.  As EPRM went to press, it had average daily trading volume of $3.5 billion, accounting for nearly 50% of the company's revenues from wholesale marketing activities." -- Energy Power Risk Management, May 2001

WELCOME
New Hires
EIM   - Cheryl Lindeman
ENA  - Chris Bystriansky, Paula Craft, Eugene Lee, Bhalachandra Mehendale, Sarah Wooddy

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - Grace Taylor, Steven Irvin, Dina Snow

NUGGETS & NOTES

Enron is hosting the Chicago Energy Risk Management Seminar at The Drake Hotel in Chicago on June 14, 2001.  Topics include: Power Outlook, Natural Gas Outlook, Hedging Strategies, Weather Risk Management and Pulp and Paper Risk Management. The RSVP deadline is June 8th so please contact Laura Pena as soon as possible at x 3-5376.  This is a great event for "new" as well as established customers.  There will be a cocktail reception immediately after the presentations.  Enron will also be hosting seminars in Atlanta, Houston, Denver and San Francisco.  Dates to be announced soon.

Travel tip of the week:
Flights reserved through Travel Agency in the Park provide you with $150,000 of flight insurance at no additional charge.

EnronOnline Statistics
Below are the latest figures for EnronOnline as of May 29, 2001.

*	Total Life to Date Transactions >  1,015,000
*	Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $610 billion

NEWS FROM THE GLOBAL FLASH

Enron arranges first gas pipeline import into Italy
Enron has continued its pioneering activities in the Continental gas market by arranging the first gas import into Italy.  The Italian team worked with the Continental Gas desk to arrange this strategically important agreement with Blugas SpA., the wholesale gas company formed by the municipalities of Cremona, Lodi, Mantova and Pavia in north-eastern Italy.  Enron has sourced 100,000 cubic metres per day of natural gas from northern Europe to transport to Italy, transiting it through Germany and Switzerland, despite fierce resistance from Ruhrgas and TransitGas respectively.

Aside from isolated LNG imports by incumbent monopolies this is the first time that any company has managed to import natural gas by pipeline into Italy since the Italian gas sector was officially liberalised in August 2000. The gas, which started flowing at 06.00 on Thursday 17th May 2001, will be used to meet the needs of two thirds of Blugas' residential customers within the four municipalities. The current contract lasts for five months.

Congratulations to Fabio Greco, Carsten Haack, Didier Magne, Michael Schuh, Marco Lantieri and Daniela Uguccioni.

Enron in the Middle East
Enron has relinquished its stake in Dolphin Energy, the joint venture company formed to develop gas reserves in Qatar.
Enron has agreed to transfer its 24.5 per cent stake in the project to the United Arab Emirates Offset Group (UOG), the majority shareholder. The agreement allows Enron to deploy capital elsewhere and gives UOG the opportunity to seek new partners before the project moves into its next phase.

Development of the Emden/Oude gas hub moves ahead fast
An important milestone in the evolution of the new gas trading hub on the Dutch-German
border was reached last week. Last Friday some of the major European gas players held a meeting to officially establish the Emden/Oude gas hub. Although Enron had already initiated the development of the Emden/Oude hub by making a market through EnronOnline as early as December 2000, the goal of this meeting was to set up a working group similar to the Zeebrugge focus group who can  work on setting a legal framework for the Emden/Oude hub.

Enron was elected as the only new market entrant in this group, reflecting the high level of respect industry peers have for Enron as a major player in the Continental gas market -- even from incumbents!

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Please find attached the captioned report for the week ending May 11.  A topic / key word index follows below, in order to facilitate coming up to date on topics of interest to you.  If you wish to add or delete names from the distribution, please advise.   Should you have any question on any of the items, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.  Thanks.  Ray

Bonneville: 42
Bylaws: 18
Complaint: 26
Data request: 36,45
Interconnect Agreement: 5,20,33,34,38
Meter Service Agreement: 9,10,14,16,17,21
Participating Generator Agreement: 8,11,12,13
Power Sale Agreement: 19,27,44
Power Sale Tariff: 1,2,7,24,37
RTO: 6,41,43
Transmission Service Agreement: 4,28,29,30,31
Transmission Tariff: 3,22,23,32,35,39,40


Actually it was 74,378 as all of the OSU fans joined in the shitting of bricks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Crook, Jody; Rabon, Chance; Hull, Bryan; Blanchard, Timothy
Subject:	FW: OU Stadium Renovation

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Logan III, Jackson
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:08 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.; Bass, Eric
Subject:	FW: OU Stadium Renovation

HOOK'EM

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<cameron.moates@us.pwcglobal.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	kyle@nanoscale.com; ryanvford@yahoo.com; Mhansen@MDCP.com; hannam@vankampen.com; megan.m.healy@us.arthurandersen.com; adam.hickey@us.pwcglobal.com; johnpkeeton@yahoo.com; jkorman@worldnet.att.net; jlogan3@enron.com; s.s.parker@us.arthurandersen.com; lprieto@uominc.com; schullerg@hdvest.com; Graham.Sones@cit.com; Brian_Thorp@AIMFUNDS.COM; madeofmetal@sprintmail.com; Jon_Wooton@gmaccm.com; andrew.higdon@us.pwcglobal.com; edgar.a.cardenas@us.pwcglobal.com
Subject:	OU Stadium Renovation

Norman (AP)

Oklahoma University Athletic Director Joe Castiglione announced today that
due to recent developments, the renovations at Owen Field are well ahead of
schedule and will come in under costs. Seems over 71,000 fans shit a brick
during the fourth quarter of the bedlam football game, providing the
necessary materials to begin work right away.

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001
11:34 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie Brewer @ ENRON                           03/27/2001 10:11 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Rebooks

Can you please have this deal rebooked as indicated by credit.

Thanks. Julie


Dude, do you have Cheryl's phone number?


MICHAEL GARRED @
NEWPOWER
03/13/2001 04:53 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, Timothy Ray/HOU/NewPower@NewPower,
Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TCo and Gulf Capacity for April 2001

Chris,

As you and I both know and discussed, New Power will manage what used to be
the old CES TCo and Gulf capacity starting in April, 2001.  We have talked to
the CDC's (COH, CPA, CMD, & CVA) have worked out the following with them:

CMD & CVA
CMD and CVA will recall all of the CES capacity on Gulf and TCo from you.
They will subsequently re-release it to New Power effective April 1, 2001.
New Power will execute it at that time.  This should happen late this week or
early next week.

CPA
CPA will not recall it form ENA and re-release to New Power.  Can you
permanently release all of that capacity at max rates to New Power as soon as
possible effective April, 2001?

COH
For COH, the biggest pieces of capacity on TCo are FSS storage and
corresponding SST contracts.  They both expire in March 2001.  Therefore
nothing is required of ENA in terms of releasing them to New Power.

There is a contract with an mdq of 1,000/day primary from Leach to COH 8-35
Pittsburgh (K#:  67694) that should be permanently released to New Power at
max rates effective April, 2001.

There are, I believe, about seven contracts (K#'s:  68918, 68915, 69148,
69693, 68916, 68917, 69149) with primary receipt point(s) in the Toledo agg
area.  The primary delivery points are 5-2 Parma, 5-7 Sandusky, and 7-4
Alliance.  These contracts need to be permanently released to New Power at
the following rates:
 68918 - $5.171
 68915 - $5.171
 69148 - $5.171
 69693 - $5.171
 68916 - $5.181
 68917 - $5.181
 69149 - $5.181

Let me know that this okay.

Michael H. Garred
Manager, Risk Management
The New Power Company
713-853-5488 Pager 888-620-2369
mgarred@newpower.com


As we move into the Spring/Summer of 2000, it is time to turn our attention
to the performance review process.  Mid-year is always busy and we have a
number of important tasks and projects in process.  While recognizing this,
it remains extremely important to take time over the next few weeks to gather
necessary information to provide quality and meaningful feedback for our
employees, as well as utilize this information during the year end review
process.

In the spirit of One Enron, the Performance Review Process (PRC) will be
global for Mid-year 2000.  Vice Presidents and above across all operating
companies will be reviewed and discussed in a consistent manner with
identical criteria.   ENA will review all professional level and above
employees.  The timeline and training for the midyear process are outlined at
the end of this memo.  Your HR Business Consultant is also available to
answer questions.

With regards to the Global Functions, review sessions will be led by the
Global and/or Corporate Functional heads, and will be designed to calibrate
personnel within these areas of expertise.  The Global Functional Review
Areas include:

_ NetWorks/Technology
_ Accounting
_ RAC
_ Finance
_ Human Resources
_ Public Relations & Reg Affairs	G. Whalley
	R. Causey
	R.  Buy
	A. Fastow
	C. Olson
	S. Kean

ENA Mid-Year Process:

ENA has received favorable feedback on the review process used for Mid-year
and Year-end 1999, and as such, will follow the same general guidelines and
process for Mid-year 2000.  The following are key features of the Mid-year
2000 process:

o The focus of the feedback will continue to be on the qualitative aspects,
as opposed to quantitative.  Toward this end, communication of the employee,s
explicit ranking will be left to the discretion of the business unit manager.
o Initial discussions with employees regarding their accomplishments, are
highly encouraged, prior to the Business Review Meetings.
o Mid-year performance results will be used as baseline performance
information for Year-end 2000.
o Creation of 3 standard feedback forms for all peer groups.
o Standardization of criteria for all peer groups.
o   Utilization of a consistent 6 gradation rating scale.
o All exempt employees will be discussed at Business Review Meetings and
placed into one of six categories by peer group.  ENA VP's will be pre-ranked
by the ENA Office of the Chairman and Managing Directors prior to the Enron
PRC.  Non-exempt (overtime eligible) employees will be evaluated by their
supervisors and placed into one of the 6 categories.  The results of the
Business Review Meetings will be the final rankings for exempt employees
below VP, subject to ENA Office of the Chairman.
o A minimum of two representatives from other functional areas will be
required at the Business Review Meetings.  The meetings should otherwise be
rescheduled to allow this very important representation to take place.  The
nominated individuals are illustrated below.
o The top 5 HR priorities/challenges for 2000 should also be agreed to at the
Business Review Meetings.
o Analysts and Associates will be pre-reviewed in a Business Review Meetings
based on their current rotation, then cross-calibrated at the Enron Global
Analyst and Associate Business Review Meeting.

Peer Groups:

 Commercial
 Commercial Support
 Technical
 Specialized Technical

Performance Criteria (for all peer groups):

Innovation/Entrepreneurship
Communication/Setting Direction
Teamwork/Interpersonal
Leadership/Vision/Values
Business Instinct
Analytical/Technical

Guidelines:

o Use of multiple sources of input is encouraged (employee, peers, direct
reports, internal customers, external customers), as is a self-evaluation
o Employees should recommend 5-10 reviewers to Supervisor and Supervisor
should select at least three of the employee,s recommendations
o All feedback must be entered via the Performance Management System located
on the intranet
o Supervisor should consolidate the feedback, prepare a draft of the
Performance Review form and meet with the employee prior to the Business
Review meeting
o Final feedback to exempt employee follows the July 28th meeting
o For VP's & MD's, final feedback follows the Enron Executive Committee
Meeting

Business Review Meetings / VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting
Responsibilities / Actions:

The following list represents suggested groups and the individuals
responsible for each Business Review Meeting.  Attendees at the meetings are
appropriate Supervisors within the Business Unit.  In addition, the Office of
the Chairman requires the attendance of two to three other senior level
representatives from other Business Units to add external perspective.

Area/Function	ENA Lead	Global/Functional Lead*	Required Non-functional  Attendees

COMMERCIAL

Trading	Presto		Dietrich
	Shankman		Calger
	Lavorato		Bowen
	McClellan		Ajello
	Hickerson		Delainey
	Belden

Origination	Redmond		Shankman
	Dietrich		McClellan
	Milnthorp		Belden
	Calger		Presto
	Donahue		Delainey
	Bowen		Lavorato
	Ajello
	Duran
	Ondarza
	Malcolm
	Overdyke
	Thompson/Josey
	Yzaguirre

Finance(*)	Jakubik	Fastow

COMMERCIAL SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL

Legal	Haedicke
Research	Kaminski
RAC	Buy
Technical	Miller/Parquet

Energy Operations (*)	Beck	Causey	Colwell
			Oxley

Business Analysis & Reporting/Tax (*)	Colwell	Causey	Beck
	Mintz

Human Resources (*)	Oxley	Olson

Public Relations (*)	Palmer	Kean

NetWorks/Technology (*)	Perlman	Whalley/McConnell

(*) Note:  Global Functional Review meetings to be held for these areas.

ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee:

Ray Bowen	Mark Frevert	Dan Leff (non ENA rep)	David Oxley
Dave Delainey	Brian Redmond	George McClellan	Mark Haedicke
Janet Dietrich	Julia Murray	Jeff Shankman	Gary Hickerson
Jeff Donahue	Jere Overdyke	Marty Sunde (non ENA rep)	John Lavorato

Outcomes of Business Review Meetings/ VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meetings:

o Calibration of employees into six gradations
o Promotion nominations below VP
o Assessment of  the &right people in the right jobs8
o Assessment of gaps for what is needed in the Business Unit (skills,
capabilities, training,
 experience)
o Top five HR challenges
o Feedback to employees on the results of the meetings, as applicable

Timeline
PEP System Open for Feedback    May 17
PEP System Closes for Feedback    June 9
Feedback Collection/Initial Employee    May 17-June 12
 Discussions
Global Functional Review Meetings   June 12-June 16
ENA Business Review Meetings    June 12-July 25
ENA VP Pre-Ranking Committee Meeting  July 28
Enron Executive Committee meeting   July 31-Aug. 1


<<List of Outstanding Issues for Completion of World Hunger Form
Agreement.DOC>>
 Attached is the List of Outstanding Issues for Completion of
World Hunger Form Agreement memo annotated to show who is responsible
for various actions.
 - List of Outstanding Issues for Completion of World Hunger Form
Agreement.DOC


Richard,

Here are a few comments on the CalPX letter to FERC outlining the difficulties in calculating PX refunds.

1.  The PX claims it is a "neutral party in this proceeding" and is only a conduit for cash.  True for PX business, not true for CAISO obligations.  The CAISO holds SC's responsible for non-payment, not the SC's customers.  The PX was the SC for most of the transactions going through the day-ahead and hour-ahead market.  Therefore, the PX is primarily liable.  I'm not sure how this helps us, though, since the PX has no money.

2.  Page 3, SC Data.  I was unaware that the CalPX acted as SC until February 28th---one month after it closed the doors on January 31st.  During this time, the CAISO was probably in violation of its Tariff, which requires SCs to be creditworthy.

3.  Page 5.  Commandeered contracts.  What is the status of the PX's claim against the State of California?  The State owes the PX, as representative for its Participants, the mark-to-market value of the contracts on January 31st, less amounts paid by CDWR to suppliers.  If the PX won't bring this claim, its bankruptcy trustee or the PX Participants should bring this claim against the State of Califonria.

4.  Pages 3 and 4.  $150 Breakpoint.  I asked Kit Blair in Volume Management to review this letter and he said that it was his view and the view of two other folks in VM that the PX is vastly overstating the difficulty in calculating the $150 breakpoint.  His view was that it should take hours or days, but not weeks.  However, I do not see how we get an advantage from accelerating the calculation of refunds.

Finally, according to reports from Credit and VM, the remaining PX employees are not exactly the "A-team."   I suggest we should ask FERC to require the PX to document its methodology for calculating refunds, so that we can review for errors.  Spot audits by independent auditors might be a good idea, too.

Steve


It's changed.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/16/2001 01:26 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

can you ch 523878 to the 17th?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/16/2001 10:46 AM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

This deal is the same as all the others Carla Hoffman entered yesterday - in
the interest of time, she entered all deals with a Saturday-Sunday mask in
Deal Blotter. If the deals were on peak, she said it shouldn't matter that
they were marked to flow both days, because Sunday is all off-peak hours. I
explained this in a couple e-mails yesterday - I guess I got confused about
who I told. Carla said she's done this before and it shouldn't be a problem.
Please let me know if you agree with this. In my opinion, just taking the
time to explain the discrepancy in the 10 or 12 deals that were entered this
way actually took more time than it saved. What do you think?

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/16/2001 06:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

what about this deal?

Kerri Thompson
02/15/2001 04:13 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

523878

broker shows it for the 17th.


Fyi - Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron on 03/14/2000
07:22 AM ---------------------------

"Terry D. Boss" <tboss@INGAA.org> on 03/14/2000 09:56:15 AM
To: "Dave Johnson (E-mail)" <David.L.Johnson@enron.com>, ""Mike Terraso
(E-mail)" <mterras@enron.com>, ""Tilford Vik (E-mail)" <tvik@enron.com>
cc: " "Max Brown (E-mail)" <mbrown@enron.com>,

Subject: As Predicted, the USA Today Article on Pipelines

	03/13/00- Updated 11:56 PM ET

	?

	When pipelines  are time bombs

	2 million miles of them deliver potential catastrophe every  day

	By Patrick McMahon, USA TODAY

	BELLINGHAM, Wash. - Last summer, an underground pipeline ruptured in a  city
park here and sent a torrent of gasoline along a wooded streambed  toward two
10-year-olds playing with a barbecue lighter.

	After the  16-inch pipeline had been hemorrhaging for an hour and 34 minutes,
an  explosion sent a fireball racing through the park. A plume of smoke rose
30,000 feet.

	Authorities say the blast probably was triggered by a  spark from the lighter.

	"There was a spark and the sky turned  orange, the boys both told me
afterward," says Frank King, whose son,  Wade, was one of the boys in the
park. Wade and his friend, Stephen  Tsiorvas, were burned over 90% of their
bodies. They died the next  day.

	Also killed was 18-year-old Liam Wood, who had graduated from  high school
five days before. The college-bound Wood was fly-fishing in  the park when he
was overcome by fumes, fell into the creek and  drowned.

	"To many people, the boys were considered heroes," says  Mark Asmundson, the
mayor of this seaside city north of Seattle. In  sparking the explosion, the
boys kept the most extensive damage confined  to the 241-acre park, he says.
"The river of gasoline was heading right  for the center of the city."

	On Monday, the Senate Commerce  Committee held a one-day hearing here, about
five minutes from where the  incident occurred, on legislation to improve
safety and government  oversight of pipelines and the companies that operate
them. The hearing  included gripping, sometimes tearful, testimony from the
boys' parents as  well as statements from state and federal officials.

	"My baby died  because of inaction. His death was preventable," said
Katherine Dalen,  Stephen's mother.

	More than 2 million miles of iron, steel and  plastic pipes - some as large
as 5 feet in diameter - snake beneath the  earth and deliver oil, gasoline,
natural gas and potential disaster across  America every day. They range from
the trans-Alaskan pipeline to tiny  pipes carrying natural gas to people's
homes. Safer than gasoline trucks  or ocean-going tankers by most measures,
once-remote pipelines are  prompting new worries as sprawling metropolitan
areas grow into their  paths.

	U.S. pipeline accidents have fluctuated in the past 10  years. In the 1990s,
there were 3,917 liquid fuel spills and natural gas  leaks, roughly one a
day. The incidents, most involving local lines  carrying natural gas,
resulted in 201 deaths, 2,826 injuries and $778  million in property damage
from 1990 through 1999.

	There also are  environmental costs. In January, one of the nation's largest
pipeline  companies, Koch Industries of Wichita, Kan., paid a $30 million
civil fine  to settle Environmental Protection Agency water-pollution
charges  involving 300 oil spills from 1990 to 1997. The EPA said Koch failed
to  inspect its pipelines and waited for leaks before making  repairs.

	Liam Wood's mother, Marlene Robinson, is focused on  stronger regulations
nationwide, including more and better inspections,  and regional watchdog
committees.

	"I don't have any children left  to protect," she said in an interview and
repeated at the hearing. "This  didn't have to happen to Liam, and it doesn't
have to happen to other  people's children."

	Although the cause of the Bellingham incident  remains under investigation,
one factor might have been damage to the  pipeline from a backhoe when a
water line was being installed in 1995. But  investigators also have many
questions about the role of Olympic Pipeline  Co., which operates a network
of pipelines along a 299-mile corridor from  north of Bellingham to Portland,
Ore.

	Investigators for the  National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) want to
know whether Olympic  ignored warning signs and whether it could have acted
more swiftly after  the leak. But the inquiry has been delayed by a parallel
investigation by  the U.S. Attorney's Office. Several Olympic employees have
declined to  testify and have invoked their constitutional rights against
self-incrimination.

	Pipeline owners and government regulators  defend the safety of transporting
two-thirds of the nation's fuels by  pipeline, and they warn that more rules
could boost energy prices. Critics  say pipelines are too loosely regulated,
not fully inspected and, in some  cases, deteriorating.

	The U.S. Transportation Department oversees  pipelines. Its Office of
Pipeline Safety sets standards for design,  operation, maintenance and
emergency response. Richard Felder, who heads  the office, testified at
Monday's hearing. "Our goal is to prevent  incidents like Bellingham from
ever happening again," he said.

	In  an earlier interview, he defended his office's performance and the
industry: "It's a good record. It's the safest form of transporting fuel,
far and away."

	The office has extensive rules on pipeline safety,  including requirements
for signs along the route and programs to alert  potential diggers, but
"there's no such thing as risk elimination," Felder  says. "All you can do is
manage it."

	But the chairman of the  federal government's transportation safety watchdog
agency is unimpressed  with Felder's office and says it deserves a grade of
F. "It's been the  most frustrating area I've had to deal with as chairman,"
says Jim Hall,  NTSB chairman since 1994. He says no agency has a worse
record of  responding to NTSB recommendations.

	In a recent speech, he said  there's no indication that the Office of
Pipeline Safety "is in charge or  that its regulations, its inspections, its
assets, its staffing and its  spirit are adequate to the task."

	Felder takes issue with much of  the criticism, but he endorses calls for
more research into pipeline  safety. He said his office is in the final
stages of preparing new safety  standards for heavily populated and
environmentally sensitive  areas.

	He emphasized that the leading cause of pipeline failure is  "third-party
damage" from road, utility and construction work. The agency  has worked to
enhance a system to alert pipeline companies of digging with  one telephone
call.

	Felder is critical of local authorities who  ignore pipelines when making
decisions on housing and commercial  development. "Local planning has not
kept people away from pipelines," he  says. "It's astounding to me."

	Felder bristles at critics'  suggestions that his agency is a tool of the oil
and gas industry. "I  can't agree with that one iota," he says. "We try to
balance the safety  issue and the economic issue."

	The Senate Commerce Committee will  consider a bipartisan bill sponsored by
Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and  Slade Gorton, R-Wash.; Rep. Jack Metcalf,
the Republican who represents  Bellingham; and Rep. Jay Inslee, a Democrat
whose district includes an  operating section of the pipeline.

	The bill would require periodic  internal inspections of pipelines, boost
federal spending on research,  increase the number of federal pipeline
inspectors nationwide - there now  are 55 - and expand states' regulatory
authority. On Monday, the Office of  Pipeline Safety gave the state of
Washington the temporary right to do  more inspections.

	The Murray-Gorton bill also would require federal  certification of pipeline
workers and expand the public's right to know  about spills and leaks.

	"I was totally shocked and amazed when  this happened," Murray says. "You
always assume that your neighborhood is  safe and somebody has taken care of
this."

	The Bellingham rupture  not only dumped 278,000 gallons of gasoline into this
city of 63,000 near  the Canadian border but also unleashed civic furor at
Olympic Pipeline.  "It's hard for people to get interested in things they
can't see. Out of  sight is out of mind," Mayor Asmundson says. He has
visited the boys'  grieving families and lobbied Congress. The blast "has
dominated my life  since June 10."

	Pipeline operators portray accidents as isolated to  escape national
scrutiny, he says. "The whole focus of the industry is  containment. Do
whatever you have to do locally, but don't stir things up  nationally."

	Last week, Murray released a report she requested from  the Transportation
Department's inspector general. It faults the Office of  Pipeline Safety for
ignoring enhanced safety requirements, including  increased inspections
inside pipes, in highly populated and  environmentally sensitive areas as
Congress required in 1992 and 1996.

	A U.S. General Accounting Office audit of operations is due in  May. Also
pending is a decision from Felder and the pipeline safety office  on whether
to restart the 39-mile section shut down since the Bellingham  accident.
Olympic Pipeline has repaired the line and is eager to reopen  it.

	People living along the route and officials are pushing for  more extensive
testing of the still-operating section of the line south of  Bellingham.
Felder says he has not decided whether it should be shut down.

	Last week, Felder's office ordered a new round of testing along  the entire
line, but critics such as Inslee are not convinced it will be  enough. The
tests must be conducted on the closed section of the pipeline  before a
decision is made on reopening it.

	Contributing: Scott  Hillkirk

Confidential: INGAA Member Use  only

Terry D. Boss
VP Environment Safety and Operations
INGAA
tboss@ingaa.org
?


Denis -

Sorry for the delay in forwarding the below information.  The week has been a
bit crazy. I am in the process of providing comments and will forward those
when available.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 09:59 AM -----

	Craig Chaney@ECT
	04/16/2001 12:48 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: S&P Letter of Intent

Mark,
I need your review of the attached letter or intent by Thursday.  Citibank
and S&P have reviewed it and accepted the attached draft.  As usual the only
thing binding is the NDA portion of the letter.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Craig
3-3840


I'll be there.

Errol

Jeffrey C Gossett@ECT
04/25/2001 05:04 PM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Irena

We got Irena a day at the spa during the week.  And for those of you that are
here on Friday,  I would like to take her to lunch as well.

Let me know if you are coming.


Jeffrey C Gossett
01/31/2001 04:32 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Natural Gas Risk Books on EOL

Please look over the following and call Dawn with any books that need to be
deleted from their system.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
04:31 PM ---------------------------

Dawn C Kenne
01/31/2001 04:23 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Natural Gas Risk Books on EOL

Voila!

Finally, a list of the natural gas risk books that EOL has on file.  Please
review the list and let us know which ones are no longer valid books.

Let me know if you need further information. Sorry it took so long to get to
you!

Dawn
3-9353