On popular demand, I have arranged to have Ed Chang, Lexis Corporate Attorney
back to Enron to do a presentation on "How to Search Public Records on
Lexis".  He'll also brief us on new features of Lexis.com.   Please see the
attached flyer for details.

Come see Certifinder & Company Dossier
LEXIS-NEXIS EASY SEARCH PAGES

Lexis Public Records Training
Date:   Wednesday, 9/27
Time:   11:30 Am - 1:00 PM
Place:   Conference Room EB47C2
Lunch will be provided by Lexis.
R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x36775 by Noon, 9/26

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775

 <<enronpubrec.doc>>
 - enronpubrec.doc


This should help clean things up a lot.  Please let me know when they have been removed, such that I can get credit to rerun the list of active deals.  It would be great if it is ready early tomorrow as I would like my guy to create the spreasheet with gas/power/crude/etc/total for our meeting tomorrow.

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: Theriot, Kim S.
Sent: Tue 1/22/2002 5:50 PM
To: Cheung, Cecilia
Cc: Mulvany, Patrick; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject: RE: termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

For clarification, the request below is to move active Natural Gas Financial Transactions as of 12/1/01 to the Bankruptcy Book.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Mulvany, Patrick
Sent:   Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:58 PM
To:     Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:     Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Theriot, Kim S.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:        termination list for deals to be moved to bankruptcy book

Cecilia,

Here is the list of Counterparties that have been requested:

CP ID        Counterparty

504          Alabama Gas Corporation
8            Amerada Hess Corporation
64516        Avista Corporation
55265        Avista Energy, Inc.
68247        Bankers Trust International PLC
65291        BP Corporation North America Inc.
410          Burlington Resources, Inc.
23848        Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation
79689        Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
5264         Cargill, Incorporated
881          Central Illinois Light Company
65599        CMS Field Services Inc.
69           Columbia Energy Services Corporation
56630        Consolidated Energy Solutions, Inc.
26427        Consumers Gas Company, LTD.
74362        Continental Gas, Inc.
52577        Cornerstone Propane, L.P.

1424    Florida Power Corporation
55109   Hess Energy Trading Company LLC
3796    Hunt Petroleum Corporation
1901    Kaztex Energy Management Inc.
2094    Marathon Oil Company
53782   National Energy & Trade, L.L.C.
5563    New York Mercantile Exchange
64141   NJR Energy Services Company
155     Noble Gas Marketing Inc.
151     Northern Illinois Gas Company
69121   NRG Power Marketing Inc.
63665   Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.
54438   PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
58402   PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
46709   Phibro Inc.
55776   Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc.
33367   PMI Trading, LTD
49262   Questar Energy Trading Company
65268   Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
187     San Diego Gas & Electric Company
103469  Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
3996    Sithe Energies, Inc.
26146   Societe Generale
11134   St. Mary Land & Exploration Company
3022    Texaco Natural Gas Inc.
81385   The New Power Company
37810   Venoco, Inc.
96651   Vitol Capital Management Ltd.
46924   Vitol S.A.
232     Western Gas Resources, Inc.
237     Wisconsin Power And Light Company


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

"SOCORRO HERNANDEZ" <SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM> on 08/23/2000 11:39:11 AM
To: <Judy.Hernandez@enron.com>, <irenepepe@hotmail.com>,
<smanzanales@jw.com>, "A. SUE GONZALES-GUEVARA" <AGUEVARA@LLGM.COM>,
"CATHERINE BROWN" <CLBROWN@LLGM.COM>, "ELIZABETH TRUJILLO"
<ETRUJILL@LLGM.COM>, "JESSICA VEGA" <JVEGA@LLGM.COM>, "VIVIAN FARRELL"
<VFARRELL@LLGM.COM>, <Maria.Soliz@ppfa.org>, <bburrell@tmh.tmc.edu>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: "Erma's Angel

   To the special women friends in my life.  Some of
>>     this you'll understand all too well and other parts you
>>     may not have experienced yet, but I think it's good
>>     advice no matter what point you're at in your life.
>>
>>                 Erma's Angel
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have talked less and
>> > > > listened more.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have invited friends over to
>> > > > dinner even if the carpet was
>> > > > stained and the sofa faded.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have eaten the popcorn in
>> > > > the "GOOD" living room and
>> > > > worried much less about the dirt
>> > > > when someone wanted to light a fire
>> > > > in the fireplace.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have taken the time to
>> > > > listen to my grandfather ramble
>> > > > about his youth.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would never have insisted the car
>> > > > windows be rolled up on a
>> > > > summer day because my hair had just
>> > > > been teased and sprayed.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have burned the pink candle
>> > > > sculpted like a rose before it
>> > > > melted in storage.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have sat on the lawn with my
>> > > > children and not worried
>> > > > about grass stains.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have cried and laughed less
>> > > > while watching television and
>> > > > more while watching life.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would have gone to bed when I was
>> > > > sick instead of pretending the
>> > > > earth would go into a holding
>> > > > pattern if I weren't there for the day.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would never have bought anything
>> > > > just because it was practical,
>> > > > wouldn't show soil or was guaranteed
>> > > > to last a lifetime.
>> > > >
>> > > > Instead of wishing away nine months
>> > > > of pregnancy, I'd have
>> > > > cherished every moment realizing
>> > > > that the wonderment growing inside
>> > > > me was the only chance in life to
>> > > > assist God in a miracle.
>> > > >
>> > > > When my kids kissed me impetuously,
>> > > > I would never have said,
>> > > > "Later.  Now go get washed up for dinner."
>> > > >
>> > > > There would have been more "I love you's"
>> > > > and more "I'm sorry's"
>> > > > ....but mostly, given another shot
>> > > > at life, I would seize every
>> > > > minute.....look at it and really see
>> > > > it ... live it ... and never give it back.
>> > > >
>> > >  > ~~ In honor of women's history month
>> > > > and in memory of Erma Bombeck
>> > > > who lost her fight with cancer.
>> > > > Here is an angel sent to watch over you ...
>> > > >
>> > > >                    * (\ *** /) *
>> > > >                   ** ( \(_)/ ) **
>> > > >                    *  (_/ \_) *
>> > > >                     ** /___\ **
>> > > >
>> > > >           Pass this on to five women that you
>> > > >           want watched over. If you don't
>> > > >           know five women to pass this on to,
>> > > >           one will do just fine.
>> > > >
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


mick-

of the three colts the one you definately don't want with the 4th pick is
marvin harrison.  i will trade you the 1st pick.  i have an offer for you if
you want to look at it.


There will be a Conference Call on Thursday May 24, 2001 at 4:00p.m. (Houston Time) and 5:00p.m. (Puerto Rico Time).

The dial in numbers are as follows:

International          847-619-8039
Domestic                800-991-9019
Passcode               6550314#

Please advise if you are unable to participate.

Thanks
Telvy

Etelvina Guerra
Enron Global Markets
Etelvina.Guerra@enron.com
713-646-8358
713-646-6560


-----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 10:20 AM
Subject:	Second Notice Transit on the Web Up Grade

February 1, 2002

To:  All Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Customers, Shippers,
Producer-Suppliers and Other Interested Parties

SECOND NOTICE:  Please review the following notice that was
posted on January 9, 2002.

Transit on the Web is upgrading its mainframe operating system.
Customers, who have not done so already, will need to upgrade
their version of QWS3270 from 16-bit to 32-bit.  QWS3270 is the
tool used for Confirmation Ranking, ONE Contracting and Capacity
Release.

We are asking that all of our Transit customers upgrade to
the 32-bit version by February 7, 2002.  The Transit Home Page
contains a link with directions to determine your version (16-bit
or 32-bit). It also contains necessary information to upgrade if
needed.

If the upgrade is not completed by February 7, 2002, customers may
not be able to access Confirmation Ranking, ONE Contracting and
Capacity Release.

If you have any questions or if you are a customer using Windows
NT, please call the Transit Help line.

Margaret E. Kleiner
Manager
Transportation Scheduling


Jeff,

 I made a few suggestions and retyped in the document for your
consideration.  I added a few words and changed the order.  If you don't like
them, go ahead and change them back and send out.

Thanks,
m

From: Jeffrey A Shankman on 02/08/2001 02:44 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

any thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 02:47 PM -----

	Jeffrey A Shankman
	02/07/2001 08:30 AM

		 To: Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT
		 bcc:
		 Subject:

As Mike and I look across all of our business units, we continue to look for
optimal organizational structures that will enable each business unit to
achieve it's targets for  2001 and beyond.  In our weather business, there
appears to be a lack of seamlessness.  Reporting relationships, P&L, and
vision for this business are not best aligned as this business exists today.

Mike and I would like to address this as follows:    we need 100% full time
dedication from each and any employee that is dedicated to the weather
business.  All identified employees in the weather business will now become
full time employees of EGM and report to Mark Tawney. Accordingly Mark and I
will be looking at, with each of you, the employees that may be affected by
this transition and the need to hire additional employees.  It is important
that both business units work together to determine which individuals will be
in Weather, or  will be in EEL.  Once done, Mark will begin adding to the
weather team in each of your regions.   It is obvious that the organizations
and product lines can lever each other and the synergy's will provide
powerful results in our regional gas and power businesses in particular.

If you look at coal, lng, equities, etc, we have employees based in each of
your regions who report back into the appropriate business unit within EGM.
This restructure will similarly align weather.

Please give me a call and we will discuss the issues surrounding this new
structure.


free your mind and the rest will follow


Please find attached the latest, and what should be the final for the immediate period of time, copy of the marketing list. Please filter the PA column by your name to double-check against the list you are currently working off of.
There are some smaller subsids of larger companies previously assigned now listed. I pulled these subs in from the credit pre-approval list. I will be passing out draft contracts folders for these counterparties tomorrow to the people responsible for the respective parent companies.
There are some companies on your lists that do not have draft packets. These companies have NOT been pre-approved by credit, but credit is working on them now. Continue to call these customers regarding password applications, but do not promise that the ISDA documents, etc. are immediately forthcoming until we receive those worksheets from credit.
Please continue to pass on both the pa information and the draft packets as you receive the correct contact info. If you have any questions at all, please call me at 5-3614 or come by my desk at 06541 in the rotunda.

Thank you,
Jennifer McQuade


I will be out of the office Friday and Monday  November 3-6, 2000.  If you
require assistance with an EOL or ClickPaper-related contracts matter during
that time, then please contact my backup Stacey Richardson.  If I am out of
the office and you are unable to reach Stacey, then please contact our
manager Linda Bryan.

Global Online Trading Contacts
     Name   Work Telephone Pager Number
For all online-related Global matters: Karen Lambert  (713) 853-0605  (713)
707-6571
Backup     Stacey Richardson (713) 853-0569  (713) 710-6084
Manager     Linda Bryan   (713) 853-3538  (713) 709-3443

     Name   Work Telephone
For Global Counterparty matters only: Samuel Schott  (713) 853-9890
Backup     Adnan Patel  (713) 853-8335  (713) 788-9458  team pager
Manager    Mary Gosnell  (713) 853-1727

Global IT User Meetings
Please contact Stacey Richardson or Linda Bryan if you have Global IT user
issues while I am out.
Our regularly scheduled Global IT User Meetings will be Monday in EB49C4.
polycom (713) 646-3614
telephone (713) 853-4832

My Scheduled Vacation Days through Year End
Friday  November 3
Monday November 6
Monday November 20
Tuesday November 21
Wednesday November 22
Friday  December 15


Thank you baby!  You're so sweet!

I just got to school.  I'm gonna study until test time.  I'm also going
to call a few day spa places and set up an appointment for my mom for
mother's day.

I can't believe it's Friday!  The days are all mixed up for me.  Last
week was so wonderful with you.  It feels like I was on a long
vacation.  It was weird taking a shower in my own shower again and going
to sleep in my own bed.

Anyway, have a good day at work.  If I get bored studying, I'll email
you again!

Love you,
Jenn


Hello Mr. Y'Barbo,

Please confirm if the below address is the one to be used as the mailing
address for your 2000 returns:

7707 Brykerwoods
Houston, TX 77055

Thank you,

Liliana Emanuelli
PwC San Juan
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


- EL01-71.1


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2000 02:58
PM ---------------------------

Jay Reitmeyer
02/07/2000 01:45 PM
To: Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT
Subject: APEA Payment

Please pay American Public Energy Agency $228,203.99 for shortages recorded
from May 1999 through November 1999.  This includes:

 July 1999 Force Majeure      $57,000.00
 November 1999 Force Majeure  $86,400.00

 May 1999 Shortage   $ 3,360.00
 June 1999 Shortage   $79,717.91
 July 1999 Shortage   $ 1,726.08

They are requesting payment by Tuesday, February 8, 2000.

Thanks for your help on this matter.

Jay Reitmeyer


here is the latest from jackie and me

>From: "Chris Neale" <chrisjneale@hotmail.com>
>To: JKelly@FairIsaac.com, Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com,
>cneale@coredevelopmentinc.com
>CC: dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu, kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu,
>tedchin@hotmail.com
>Subject: RE: FW: Review Session for Final
>Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 21:56:16 -0800
>
>Kim & Jeff, Hope all is going well with your other project.
>
>Attached is the word document containing the list of Attachements for the
>Executive Summary and who is doing which part.  For parts B - G, all that
>needs to be done is to clean up the analysis & Plot the results.
>
>Hope it helps, Chris
>
>
>
><< StadiumStudySession.doc >>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - discount rates.doc
 - JACKIE EXHIBITS.xls


The posting process as discussed below in Steve Kirks email is what we believe is the best way to handle the sale of any incremental Needles only capacity.

 In regard to new generally available capacity, for example as a result of a ROFR contract not rolling over,  the capacity would be posted as generally available, and again, per the tariff we are not required to agree to amend a primary point.  We would suggest use of a posting/open season that follows the turnback capacity for sale with the parameters for bidding laid out, including the time period for which we are accepting bids.  If no acceptable bids are received, and a shipper asks to amend their primary point, the tariff provides the right to decline unless agreed.  However, if you have given a shipper the contractual right to change their primary point ie, request an available point, you will have to accept the request.   Hope this helps and concurs with our discussion today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kirk, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb
Cc:	Miller, Mary Kay; Pavlou, Maria
Subject:	Increased Take-away at SoCal Needles

Based upon our understanding of the request from TW Marketing, here is our suggested position on the posting and awarding of potential take-away capacity at SoCal Needles from approximately 1/1/02 to 5/31/02.

TW would post on its website a notice in the capacity section that, based on information provided by SoCal regarding an expansion on their system, the take-away capacity at SoCal Needless may be increased by __Dth/day for the period of approximately 1/1/02 to 5/31/02.  Shippers would be advised that the actual start date would depend on SoCal completing their system modifications. The posting would say that TW would accept requests for such capacity during a stated period of time (a minimum of 3 business days).  TW would award the capacity to the shipper(s) willing to provide the greatest cost commitment. The greatest cost commitment would be defined as those revenues above and beyond the current revenues which Transwestern already receives from reservation charges being paid prior to the bid period.

Call me and I'll arrange for us to meet to discuss this further.   sjk


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy for 9/28/00.

The redeliveries will be 0 as well.


Thanks to the DC team - Well Done!

	Chris Long@ENRON
	07/27/2000 04:34 PM

		 To: raislerk@sullcrom.com, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Stopped anti-energy amendment!!!

Today we were successful in killing an amendment that was offered by Rep.
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) in the House Banking Committee during its markup of
the Commodities Future Modernization Act of 2000.  This amendment would have
stricken language that provided an exclusion from CFTC jurisdiction for all
non-agriculture transactions (energy, metals, broadband).  The amendment
failed, largely due to pressure from Enron, by a vote of 20-12.  Rep. Ken
Bensten (D-TX) joined Chairman Leach in speaking against the amendment.

In more positive movement, yesterday the House Commerce Committee passed its
version on the bill including a provision that exempts metal trading
multilateral trading facilities from CFTC jurisdiction.

Congress goes into recess tomorrow and we will have a better sense on how the
Rules Committee plans to reconcile differences between the versions of the
bill later this week.  The Senate is still the unknown.

Call me at any question - Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000 05:28
PM ---------------------------

Chris Long
07/26/2000 06:32 PM

To: "Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov>
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Bradley:

We have learned that two amendments will be offered tomorrow my Rep. Maloney:

#1  - Strikes lines 15-25 from page 41 and the entire page 42 (these are the
sections of HR 4541 as reported out of the Ag. Committee which address the
exemption for all most non-agriculture commodities trade on an electronic
facility.

#2  - Request a comprehensive study on the President's working group, DOE,
and FERC.

We strongly oppose amendment #1 which intends to more heavily regulate the
energy derivatives industry.  Please have Rep. Bentsen voice his opposition
to this amendment.  My guess is that amendment #2 should and will be ruled
non-germane, however this is not a compromise we would support.

Thanks - Chris
                  (202) 466-9158

"Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov> on 07/26/2000 05:31:08 PM
To: Chris.Long@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Chris, I will look this over and get back to you.

> ----------
> From:  Chris.Long@enron.com[SMTP:Chris.Long@enron.com]
> Sent:  Wednesday, July 26, 2000 5:21 PM
> To:  Edgell, Bradley
> Cc:  RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
> Subject:  CEA Hearing tomorrow
>
> <<File: CFTC.gov.doc>>
> Bradley:  The highlighted talking points could be used by Rep. Bentsen in
> response to an amendment focused on the energy derivative industry.
> Additional CFTC oversight is clearly not warranted, nor is a study needed.
> Call me with any questions at (202) 466-9158.
>
>
>
> (See attached file: CFTC.gov.doc)
>


It's official!  Dawn and Gary Wilson are the proud parents of a beautiful baby girl.  She was born at 10:41am on 9-20-01, and weighed in at 6lbs, 13oz.  They named her Grace Elizabeth.  Mom and baby are doing great and the proud  father delivered the news at 1:00pm.  Dawn is registered at Texas Womens Hospital under the last name of Kenne.

I'm sure you will all join me in wishing the new family lots of joy!

Thanks,

JLR

Jennifer Rosado
(713) 853-6890
Sr. Administrative Assistant for
EnronOnline-Product Control Group


I forgot to send this one on...SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
05:11 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Lay <sharon.lay@travelpark.com> on 11/10/2000 11:01:07 AM
To: "'sherri.sera@enron.com'" <sherri.sera@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: FW: ELECTION NEWS

Sherri, there is a polo party tonight at Solero if you are available!
> ----------
> From:  Yortex@aol.com[SMTP:Yortex@aol.com]
> Sent:  Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:13 PM
> To:  abi@mail.cybermesa.com; lizard_ar@yahoo.com; Sharon@travelpark.com;
> m.shute@eudoramail.com; BourneB@umsystem.edu
> Subject:  Re: FW: ELECTION NEWS
>
>  <<truman2002.ppt>>
> I'll send it again here -- just a Missouri political joke...  I'll resend
> it
> to a few of you in case you had trouble opening it...
>

 - truman2002.ppt


This picture is supposedly from a camera found in the wreckage of the WTC,
developed by the FBI for evidence and released on the net today.
The guy still has no name and is missing.


Mark & Rick --

 I am trying to id and assess the risk within Enron's global assets and
positions.  I need your help is making sure that these are the positions
which are critical (biggest risk) and that we have the right people on the
job.

The review team will involve (1) someone from my team, (2) someone from your
team, and (3) someone from the Regulatory Risk Working Group (to try and get
some consistency).

I have not finished all assignments but would appreciate your comments.

Thanks,

JDS


Deliveries stay the same as stated below:

Redeliveries will be:

7900  from Fuels Cotton Valley
22100 to PG&E
---------------------- Forwarded by Marta K Henderson/Houston/PEFS/PEC on
10/20/2000 08:32 AM ---------------------------

Marta K Henderson
10/20/2000 08:16 AM

To:   Darrel F. Bane/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John A. Bretz/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      Chad W. Cass/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Michael R.
      Cherry/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, William E. Speckels/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      Donna C. Spencer/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC, Julia A. Urbanek/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      briley@enron.com, dfarmer@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com,
      Sharon Beemer/FtWorth/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Connie
      Wester/EastTexas/PEFS/PEC@PEC, Ronald C. Douglas/GCS/CEC/PEC@PEC,
      Daniel C Rider/Houston/PEFS/PEC@PEC, John C Lehman/Field/PEFS/PEC@PEC
cc:

Subject:  Eastrans Nomination change effective 10/21/00

Effective 10/21/00 deliveries to Eastrans is 30,000 MMBtu/dy and maintain
at this rate until further notified.

The redeliveries will be:

7500 from Fuels Cotton Valley
22500 to PG&E


Has Herman seen this or the 1st amendment?

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           02/07/2001 08:42 AM

To: Carlos Sole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Konicek Option

Carlos,

Here is a draft of the 2nd amendment Roger and Fred were negotiating with Mr.
Konicek.  When Fred gets in I will ask him the status of this amendment.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Roger Balog@ECT on 12/20/2000 04:28 PM
To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Konicek Option

Fred
Attached is a draft of the Konicek Option for your review.
Roger


Stephanie

Tana Jones asked me to forward you the addresses for Vermilion Resources and
Benson Petroleum Ltd.

Vermilion Resources Ltd.
400, 622 - 5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0M6
403-781-9422

contact person:
C. Tom Banks, P.Eng.
V.P., Production & Marketing

The next deal will be for Benson Petroleum Ltd.

Benson Petroleum Ltd.
950, 633 - 6th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 2Y5
403-269-5158

contact person:
Glen D. Kerr, P.Eng
Production Manager

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Regards,

Shawn Anderson
403-974-6731


fyi
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 08:17 AM -----

	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>
	12/26/2000 02:23 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "'jim.armogida@enron.com'" <jim.armogida@enron.com>, "Haratunian,
Stephen" <stephen.haratunian@csfb.com>, "Skinner, Mark"
<mark.skinner@csfb.com>
		 Subject: Latest Versions of Confirmation

Sara:

I am attaching the latest draft of the confirmation prepared by my colleague,
Mark Skinner, together with a clean copy (without the line numbers).  The
attached should reflect our discussions of last week, except for the
jurisdiction issue on which I have not heard anything further.

If you have any additional comments or questions, please contact me.

Regards,

>  Maria Chiodi
>  Legal and Compliance Department
>  CREDIT | FIRST
>  SUISSE | BOSTON
>  Phone: 212-325-6724
>  Fax: 917-326-7763
>
>
 <<Fwd001222Trade1.doc>>  <<Fwd001222Trade1(clean).doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - Fwd001222Trade1.doc
 - Fwd001222Trade1(clean).doc


I guess I'd better attach the file.

Gary
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 11:26
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           04/28/2000 11:27 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Entex Revised Estimates for 4/00

The attached spreadsheet has the revised estimates for Entex citygate loads
for April.  If you need me to get with POPs/Unify to correct or change the
estimates please give me a call.

Thanks
Gary


Ben,

The site visit team shall comprise of:

Sergio Hoyos 713.427.5227
Drew Rankin  513.287.5791
Robert Whitehead 513.287.2788
Andy Giffhorn 713.427.5246

They are all Cinergy employees and their Email addresses are as CCed above.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 4:51 PM
To: dtang@cinergy.com
Cc: Don.Miller@enron.com; Dave.Kristich@enron.com; Ron.Coker@enron.com;
Ross.Newlin@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com
Subject:

David:

This e-mail will confirm the site visit by your company at Wheatland and
Gleason.  The relevant information is as follows:

(Embedded image moved to file: pic21221.pcx)

Pursuant to the Site Visit Procedures sent you by CSFB, if you have not
already done so, please send me the following:
     List of your team members and titles
     For outside consultants, state their employer
     Name, phone number (office and mobile) and e-mail address of your
     designated deal team leader

Lastly, I will serve as the due diligence coordinator for Wheatland and
Gleason, handling all questions and responses.  Should you have any due
diligence questions or require copies of any oversized documents, please
contact me at 713.853.7998.

Regards,
Ben Rogers


We should discuss this asap.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron on
08/10/2000 03:21 PM ---------------------------

"Richard Riehm" <rriehm@br-inc.com> on 08/10/2000 02:07:55 PM
Please respond to <rriehm@br-inc.com>
To: <Lorraine_Lindberg@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: I didn't think I was finished negotiating

Lorraine, I wanted to send you an e-mail about our negotiations regarding
TW/VV interconnect.  I don't want you to feel like I am trying to renegotiate
something you think we agreed to last week.

When we were talking last week about concessions I was seeking from TW in
lieu of underperfomance at the VV interconnect, I gave the example of
reducing our alternate delivery rate on the Jack Rabbit agreement, but I
wanted to talk to you further about it.  We agreed that you would call me
this week to talk about it.  It was my intention that the negotiations were
not over yet, but that we need to talk further.

Quite simply, a discounted rate on an alternate delivery point for an
agreement where I don't have a lot of volume does not do much for
Burlington.  The lack of TW's ability to accept nominated volumes from Val
Verde as mutually agreed to in the IPOA is a big and expensive issue to
Burlington.  It significantly limits our ability to operate the plant
efficiently, honor nominations of third party shippers on the system and it
is causing BR to nominate extra volume into the EPNG system which is
constrained.  All of these factors cost Burlington a significant amount of
money.

Some of the concession I am seeking include:  The same discounted rate to
make alternate deliveries into EPNG as TW at Blanco on agreement 25597.  The
same discounted rate for alternate receipts north of the LaPlatta compressor
station which in contrary to the language on agreement 25597.  I realize that
BR would be alternate firm, but the agreement would be higher in the queue
than interruptible.

Alternatively, what about terminating 25597 retroactively back to August 1.
The agreement expires at the end of the year and I really don't need the way
it is currently structured.  I have an IT agreement for $.03 with all of the
flexibility that I am looking for on 25597.

I have not sold this idea to my boss or anyone else in management.  We have
had a conceptual meeting about this issue.  It was agreed that our first
option was not to ask TW to spend a bunch of money to bring you into contract
compliance.  Instead we wanted to work with you to find some common ground.

The bottom line is that you have to give me something to take to my
management.  Please call me to discuss this.  I really do want to keep these
negotiation up beat.  I think past negotiations have not gone as well as you
or I would have liked.  I really look forward to talking to you and working
something out that is agreeable to both companies.

Richard Riehm
v:  713.624.9074
f:  713.624.9630
email:  rriehm@br-inc.com


Don Black has suggested we get you in the loop on the below issues we are
seeking answers on. We have some pending financial transactions that we would
like to work through all the Brazilian mechanics before proceeding. Your
primary contact down here for this issue will be Maria Ines Granado. Please
provide us with your comments as soon as possible so that we do not encounter
a transactional conflict.

Gustavo thank you for all your work to date we will keep you briefed to make
sure we have your input. Please follow up on the Tozzini issue we discussed
to make a final decision on their input.

Thanks
MFG

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/20/99 09:40 AM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Gustavo Junqueira                           08/17/99 06:19 PM

To: afac@tfts.tozzini.com.br
cc: Andrea Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Guerriero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, D'Arcy
Carroll/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcelo
Parodi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Porter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maria Ines
Granado/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David S
Reinfeld/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Brazilian Regulations for Swaps & Prepays

Antonio Felix,

As Enron is finding several opportunities involving financial derivatives in
Brazil, we would like to get from Tozzini Freire Law Firm a summarized but
concise read on the "cans and cannots" of these type of transactions in
Brazil. Here is my understanding of the regulations from the memo you have
already sent to us regarding swaps and prepays as well as a list of the most
common examples of deals that Enron would be encountering in the marketplace.
I would appreciate if you could comment on what is written here and also add
further information so Enron can have some sort of menu of deals of this
nature that can be pursued. I would like to ask you to add your comment in
this same message to make the review process a little easier. Thank you
inadvance for your attention.

Swaps (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

OTC Swaps

The Central Bank regulates swap transactions involving local financial
institutions acting either as dealers for their own account or as
intermediaries to the contracting parties. When the financial institutions
act as intermediaries, the agreements are in fact private agreements
negotiated by two non-financial companies, but become subject to the
requirements and regulations normally applicable to swaps involving financial
institutions. According to regulations currently in force, such swaps can
relate to exchange rates, interest rates, gold and price indices.

All of the swap agreements involving financial institutions must be
registered with CETIP or with another custody and clearing system authorized
by the Central Bank or the CVM (Brazilian SEC). As a matter of practice, the
agreements used by the banks that participate in the swap market do not
follow a standard form, since normally each bank has a particular sample form
with which it feels more comfortable.

Derivatives
In addition to exchange-traded derivatives and OTC swaps involving financial
institutions, there is no legal impediment, in principle, to derivatives
transactions being privately negotiated and entered into between two
interested parties. As a general rule in Brazil, as long as no specific
prohibition is found in the law, parties are free to negotiate agreements
that best suit their interests.

International Hedge
Central Bank regulations authorize that Brazilian companies enter into
transactions abroad, either in exchanges or having a financial institution as
their counterpart, to hedge against the fluctuation of interest rates,
exchange rates or commodity prices in the international markets.

Such hedge transactions must refer to payments in foreign currency scheduled
to be made by or to the Brazilian company in respect of commercial or
financial rights or obligations, or to payments in local currency arising out
of certain financial obligations subject to the variation of exchange rates
and payments relating to imports, exports or local transactions involving
commodities priced according to their valuation in foreign exchanges. The
commercial market exchange rates are applicable to foreign exchange
agreements referring to remittances of currency in connection with hedge
transactions.

When the underlying obligation/right is registered with the Central Bank, the
corresponding hedge transaction must be informed to the Central Bank within
10 days of its execution. When there is no registration with the Central
Bank, the banks executing the foreign exchange agreements relating to the
hedge transaction must verify the existence of the obligation/right being
hedged.

Examples

Commodity swap between two Brazilian companies:
As per what has been said above, there is nothing that precludes Enron Brazil
of entering into a swap with another Brazilian company regarding any
commodity traded by Enron (Pulp, Paper, Petrochem products, Power, Gas).
Enron does not need to be a financial institutions to provide swaps
transactions. On the other hand, I am not sure yet on the following points:
(1) Does such swap agreement should be registered with CETIP or any other
clearing system to be valid under Brazilian regulations? (2) What are the
taxes involved in a swap?

Commodity swap between a Brazilian company and an offshore company:
This kind of deal seems to be also available in the Brazilian market and the
only difference from example 1 would be the fact that it must be registered
with the Central Bank and it would involved transfer of foreign currency.

Commodity swap between two offshore companies but involving Brazilian exports:
I am not sure if Brazilian regulations would have anything to do with a
transaction like this one. I would assume that a Brazilian exporter would
sell to their offshore subsidiary and such subsidiary would sell to their end
customer. Enron would step in and offer a swap agreement for the offshore
subsidiary of the Brazilian company therefore Enron would not have any
involvement with Brazilian regulations because it would not be dealing with
Brazil.

Prepays (Pulp & Paper, Petrochem, Power)

The regulations currently in force governing export prepayments, especially
Central Bank of Brazil's Carta-Circular 2624, of February 14, 1996, establish
that all repayments of principal under such transactions must necessarily be
made by means of shipments of the relevant exported goods.  Carta-Circular
2624 allows cash remittances abroad only in regard to payments of interest
under the facility.  Therefore, it is not possible to structure a transaction
where the repayment of principal will be made only in cash or where the
borrower has the ability to choose between paying cash or exporting the goods.

A transaction that involves structuring a direct loan to the Brazilian
company where the value of the principal of which would be tied to the price
of the relevant commodity is very difficult to be approved.  Under a direct
loan registered with the Central Bank the borrower may remit all due amounts
of principal and interest in accordance with the schedule of payments
attached to the certificate of registration. The problem with such
alternative is that, although there are no express regulations preventing it
to do so, the Central Bank will most probably not issue a prior authorization
for such type of loan, as it only normally issues authorizations for normal
loans where the principal is a fixed amount and the interest rate is either a
fixed rate or a floating rate (normally based on LIBOR or US Treasury).  It
should also be noted that generally speaking all interest payments under such
an agreement are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% p.a.

CC 5 Account

A possible alternative way to structure a prepay would be by using a
non-registered loan with the Central Bank.  Under such alternative, the funds
disbursed by Enron under the loan would be remitted to Brazil through an
international transfer of Brazilian currency, as allowed by Circular 2677 of
the Central Bank of Brazil. The international transfer of Brazilian currency
("International Transfer") is a system which uses a non-resident current
account in Brazil and the Brazilian interbank foreign exchange market to
effect remittances of funds to and from Brazil.  Under such system, a lender
that wishes to disburse funds to a Brazilian borrower makes a foreign
currency deposit with a bank located outside of Brazil ("offshore bank")  and
instructs the offshore bank to deliver such dollars to a Brazilian bank in
exchange for Brazilian currency.  Such Brazilian currency is then deposited
in a non-resident account held by the offshore bank in Brazil and thereafter
transferred to the borrower. The repayments follow the inverse procedure,
i.e. the borrower deposits the amount in a non-resident account of an
offshore bank and instructs it to exchange the funds into foreign currency
and deliver them to the lender abroad.

The main differences between the registered loans and the non-registered
loans are that the non-registered loans are not subject to prior approval by
the Central Bank of Brazil (and therefore not subject to scrutiny as to their
minimum tenors and applicable interest rates) and the applicable foreign
exchange rate to non-registered loans is the floating rate (as opposed to the
commercial rate of exchange). All transfers of funds to Brazil as
International Transfers are subject to a Financial Transactions Tax ("IOF")
at the rate of 2% on the amount transferred, plus a bank fee that normally
ranges from 0.4% to 0.6% of such amount.  Any interest payments under a
non-registered loan are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% (or 25%
if the lender is located in a tax-haven jurisdiction).

I don't think this type of transaction is the best way to circumvent some of
the Brazilian regulations regarding prepayment given the bad press that deals
via the CC 5 Account mechanism would bring to Enron but I have it addressed
just in case someone does not share the same opinion.

Examples

Financial prepay between two Brazilian companies
Not allowed unless the company providing the prepay qualifies as a financial
institution as per Brazilian law. Since it will not be the case in Enron's
cases, we should not focus in these kind of transactions.

Financial prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
As it has been mentioned before it is allowed as long as Enron can structure
the prepay in way where there is a pre-established amortization schedule for
principal and interest. It is very hard to structure a prepay with specific
split between principal and interest because the objective of the prepay is
to lock on a certain volume of a product and not on a specific price.
Therefore, if Enron prepays for a specific product on a floating basis the
attached value of that commodity can go up or down as the market fluctuates
as well as the total value associate to the deal. Such value can be either
principal or interest and it is impossible to determine what it will be.

Financial prepay between two offshore companies but one being a subsidiary of
a Brazilian entity
I think there is no restrictions in this case given the whole deal will be
closed offshore and the Brazilian authorities are not going to be involved.
It will most likely be a deal involving three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Physical prepay between two Brazilian companies
No restrictions.

Physical prepay between a Brazilian company and an offshore company
No restrictions as long as there is physical deliveries.

Physical prepay between two offshore companies but  involving Brazilian
exports
No restrictions. It would also involve three parties: a company in Brazil,
its offshore subsidiary and Enron.

Thanks,

Gustavo


I don't have it.  do you need it soon?


The fax is being couriered to your home.  21 years, I can't believe it!  Ben
has been very nice to me too, and I've been nice to him!  Oh, you should have
seen Dan today.  He had a closing so he wore a shirt and bow tie.  I took a
picture.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: David Marshall

Plse  have fax delivered home.

Today is the day.  I have been a mom for 21 years.  Can't be true.

Still on conference call.  Ben has been very nice.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/07/2001 02:46 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: David Marshall

Is today Paige's birthday or tomorrow.  Of course if it was great news, then
it could be a celebratory drink.  I told Ric I may come by for a drink, but I
didn't know yet.  I think I'll call and get exact directions.

Do you need this fax I got from King and Spalding with comments on Midway?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 02:43 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: David Marshall

No news today.  I don't want to know today, as I'm drinking champagne and
ignoring the issue,


Here's our best estimate.  Please let me know if you have questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwarzbach, Stephen
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Tran, Agatha; Killen, Faith; Lee, Dana; Smith, Stephanie; Davis, Rachel A.; Vargas, Hope; Evans, Stephen; Sparger, Bob; Smith, Jeff E.; Myers, Thomas; Ueckert, Allen W.; Copeland, Erin; Selzer, Howard; Boyd, Mike; Smith, Kirk; Roper, Kerry; Galvan, Michael S.; Wood, Stephen; West, Terry
Cc:	Lindsey, Mark E.
Subject:	REQUEST - 2001 Operating Expenses - High Priority

Hello everyone.  I know that most, if not all, of you are busy with quarter close, 2002 Plan, and possibly Board of Directors presentations and that this is not the ideal time to have more added to your plate.  However, in conjunction to with setting the 2002 Plan targets, the Office of the Chairman has asked to see an analysis of 2001 operating expenses by business unit, with some level of detail, and with quick turnaround.

To that end, and to expedite this request in an efficient manner (and hopefuly save you some work), corporate accounting has already prepared a summary of operating expenses by business unit by category for the eight months ended August 31, 2001.  These categories correlate very closely with the most often used accounts in SAP (cost element groups), i.e. salaries, benefits, outside services, etc.  This information ties to your rollup in CS.  Some categories have many accounts mapped to them, and we have provided the mapping employed by corporate for you to follow (column AO).

What we are asking you to do is as follows:

1. Review the attached schedule for the eight months ended 8/31/2001 (first sheet - Expenses-YTD August 2001).  Corporate has highlighted, in yellow, various amounts that warrant some additional explanation.  Please provide an explanation for these highlighted amounts.  You may do so in any format you choose (at the bottom with a footnote, additional schedule, etc.).

2. As you may remember doing earlier this year with the 2001 Plan, please take your total expenses YTD 8/31/01 and categorize them by function.  We have provided a list of the most common functions in this file, but if you need to add functions for clarity, please do so.  Corporate gave thought to using the SAP alternate hierarchies to do this, but concluded that each BU should have input on this as you will know the most appropriate hierarchies to use and any other adjustments to make, if needed.

3. Considering what has been incurred through August and what the remainder of the year holds for your BU, please project your total 2001 operating expenses by both category and by function.  Please fill in the second sheet in the file (Expenses-Sep-Dec 2001) with your projections and review the totals sheet (Total Year Estimate).

Keep in mind that this exercise is meant to be your best estimate at this time of these items, given the quick turnaround time, and not an exhaustive project. We realize that this is the best estimate at this time and understand that these numbers may change for a variety of reasons.

If you have any questions, please call me at x33341 or Terry West at x36910.

And finally, this needs to be completed and returned to me by 1:00pm this Wednesday, October 3.

Thank you,
Steve

 << File: Aug 2001 G&A est.xls >>


We should have everything from Vance by tomorrow (NX2).

Tom Acton@ENRON
03/27/2000 03:51 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Spot tickets

Daren,  When is the drop dead date for the spot tickets for the first of the
month from Vance Wed. or Thur.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2001 11:56
AM ---------------------------

sandra delgado <sdelgado_vitoltvl@yahoo.com> on 01/30/2001 11:37:58 AM
To: KAY.MANN@ENRON.COM
cc:

Subject: 31JAN HOUSTON TO NEW YORK -- TICKETED

                                                   SALES AGT: JH/X8WEHZ

                                          MANN/C KAY

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  KAY MANN X57566

  DATE:  JAN 30 2001                   ENRON

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  31JAN HOUSTON TX     NEW YORK NY    940A    157P
CO 1966    A          WED   G.BUSH INTERCO LA GUARDIA
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL M
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:17 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

HOTEL                 31JAN OMNI BERKSHIRE PLACE
                      02FEB 21 EAST 52ND STREET AND MADISON AVE
                            NEW YORK, NY 10022
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-212 7535800
                            FAX: 1-212 7545018
                            CONFIRMATION: 1008660779
                            REFERENCE: A1KABC
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: ABC USD 287.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            REQ KINGNS
              **24 HOUR CANCEL POLICY AT THE OMNI BERKSHIRE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02FEB NEW YORK NY    HOUSTON TX     1152A   257P
CO 1961    A          FRI   LA GUARDIA     G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL M     TERMINAL C
                            LUNCH                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:05 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

      AIR FARE 1888.36      TAX 150.14          TOTAL USD
2038.50

                                            AIR TOTAL USD
2038.50

                                        INVOICE TOTAL USD
2038.50

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/L9S2FX

TICKET:                                         CO/ETKT  0057024436937
CO  FREQUENT FLYER COHG770475
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: L9S2FX
***********************************************
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


I do not have the PAC confirmation email. Can you send it again ?

	Dortha Gray@ENRON
	07/07/2000 10:48 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PAC Contribution

You have chosen to enroll in the Enron PAC.  You should have received a
confirmation e-mail which you must respond to, as your new contribution
election will not take effect without an electronic signature as outlined by
the Federal Election Commission.  As soon as we receive confirmation from
you, your enrollment will take effect the next available payroll period.

Thank you for your participation in the Enron PAC.


Gentlemen,

I haven't seen the 501D contract yet.  Is it on its way or perhaps been
misdirected?

Thanks,

Kay


When visiting w/Debbie Thompson yesterday PM, she said she had talked w/Shelley's mother.  Shelley is on her way back, but still has to have Elena's physical done.  Good news for Shelley, I'm sure!  Sheila


10 4

>>> <Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com> 01/11 1:29 PM >>>

   -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Valada Brawner" <VBrawne@nicor.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, January 11, 2002 1:27 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Are You There?

   yes, i'll call in a few minutes, I'm on the phone.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FYI - info on the recent lawsuit filed by the Oxygenated Fuels Association in
NY against the state's law banning MTBE.   I will forward information by fax
that includes more details and talking points from OFA.

Industry group challenges state's MTBE ban

by JOEL STASHENKO
Associated Press Writer

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Charging the governor and state Legislature with
political pandering, an industry group said Wednesday it is challenging New
York's ban on the gasoline additive MTBE.

The Oxygenated Fuels Association said it filed a federal court suit Tuesday
in Albany calling for the first-in-the-nation state law phasing out the use
of MTBE by 2004 be declared invalid.

The association, an Arlington, Va.-based coalition of MTBE manufacturers,
said New York and every other state is prohibited from unilaterally imposing
regulations on the use of additives which are more stringent than those set
by Congress and the president in the Clean Air Act.

The state's MTBE ban is such a law, the suit argues.

Methyl tertiary-butyl ether increases oxygen in gasoline so it burns
''cleaner'' in combustion engines and reduces air pollution, but it has
increasingly been found in ground and surface water statewide. It is a
particular concern on Long Island because residents there depend on aquifers
for drinking water.

The additive must be in gasoline sold in high-smog parts of the state, which
encompasses most of the downstate New York region.
The Oxygenated Fuels Association also argued that since the reported
problems with MTBE are from leaking gasoline storage tanks, the solution is
to better enforce tank regulations in New York and not to ban the substance
from gas.

A spokeswoman for the state Department of Environmental Conservation,
Jennifer Post, said department lawyers hadn't reviewed the suit as of
Wednesday.

''We are confident of the legislation, which is necessary to protect public
health and safeguard water resources, and we will continue to fight for
federal action to ban MTBE and identify an acceptable alternative,'' Post
said.

Discussions of banning MTBE in New York elsewhere have ''been driven more by
politics and emotion than by sound science and we are counting on the courts
to put the issue back in perspective,'' said Thomas Adams, executive
director of the Oxygenated Fuels Association.

David Liddle, a spokesman for the association, said the intent of the Clean
Air Act was to allow a range of oxygenates - enabling cleaner-burning gas -
to be used and for the ''marketplace to decide'' which was superior.
If MTBE is banned, Liddle said, that would mean ethanol would be the only
real option left. He argued that ethanol is both more expensive than MTBE
and gas does not burn as cleanly using it.

''New York has unilaterally skewed the playing field and the result is
higher prices and dirtier air,'' he argued.

State environmental officials have said they are aware of about 1,700 MTBE
spills around New York state, although not all the spills have contaminated
water supplies.

MTBE was introduced starting in the late 1970s when the use of leaded
gasoline was banned, again because of health-related concerns.

In March, the Clinton administration moved to ban MTBE. That prohibition,
expected to take up to three years to implement, was a ''backstop measure''
in case Congress can't agree on a way to phase out MTBE, said Carol Browner,
administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

MTBE is believed by some scientists to be a cancer-causing agent in animals,
but its effect on humans is being debated. A University of California study
last year concluded that more research is needed on its health effects, but
it added that MTBE has the ''potential to cause cancer in humans.'' Some
researchers have suggested that the inhalation or intake of MTBE can also
trigger headaches, asthma or neurological damage


Before we send anything other than the "thank you" e-mail I sent to Jeff, and
before we have any conversations with GE on this point, we need to seek Kay's
guidance based on her read of the contract and the issues Jeff raised in his
letter.

Kay - will you have some time to talk about this Friday?

Regards,

Ben

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Walker @ ENRON                           05/09/2001 01:39 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Ben

The way we actually paid the invoices changed slightly after Chris had sent
the letter to GE.  We deducted the LD's and the retention amount from the
April 25th invoice (since the May invoice was not due until May 25th).

On May 8th, a wire totalling $1,671,039 was sent to GE -- this represented
$469,000 for the c/o #2 invoice and $1,202,039 for the April 25th invoice
less the LD's and retention.

To respond to Jeff Darst's letter, we can say that we are planning on paying
the May 25th invoice in full (assuming we're not planning on deducting
additional LD's for May 8-May 25).

We just need to clarify with Jeff that both the LD and the retention were
deducted from the April invoice, and then we can deal with resolving the
issues he discusses in his letter.

Regards,
Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001
01:22 PM ---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 05/09/2001 01:18:59 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Rebecca.Walker@enron.com

Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Chris,

Please see attached letter, original to follow via FedEx.

 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>
 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>

 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf
 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf


Subject: So True!!

Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, on his way home from work

 at City Hall, came to a dead halt in traffic on the Dan

 Ryan Expressway and thought to himself, "Wow, this traffic

 seems worse than usual. Nothing's moving at all."

 He noticed a State Trooper walking back and forth between

 the lines of cars, so he rolled down his window and asked,

 "Officer, I'm Mayor Richard M. Daley, what's the problem;

 what's holding everything up."

 The trooper replied, "It's the Reverend Jackson.  He's so

 depressed about the thought of everyone knowing about his

 extra-martial affair and his illegitimate child, that he

 stopped his car in the middle of the Dan Ryan Expressway

 and is threatening to douse himself with gasoline and set

 himself on fire. He says the country and his congregation

 are blaming him for his infidelity and doesn't know if he

 can live with the shame and embarrassment.  The people in

 the halted cars along the expressway are taking up a

 collection for him."

 "Oh really," replied Mayor Daley. "How much have they

 collected for the Reverend Jackson so far?"

 "About 300 gallons," said the trooper, "but they are still

 siphoning"


Hello All,

       The new version of curve manager(2.1.0.15) is out in production. The new features in this version are

1. Position history for up to three days can be viewed
2. A new position report called 'Position Difference' is available now. This report gives the difference between the
    positions of the selected date and the date prior to that.
3. Real time gas prices and heat rate can be viewed using the Curve spread screen.

Regards

- Arun
x37102


fyi, i returned the call.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/11/2000 05:01 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Media Story

Refer such calls to Karen Denne in Houston.  Thanks.

	George Waidelich@EES
	12/11/2000 04:57 PM

		 To: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Media Story

I received a call from Tim Roberts of the Energy Journal in San Jose CA.
They are writing a piece on the current energy situation in CA and how it is
effecting IPP's and power marketers and their intentions towards the CA
market in the future.  He would like to speak with somebody at Enron.  As far
as I know, I do no have media clearance so I had no comment.

If Enron wants an opportunity to make a public statement we should talk to
this guy as early as possible today or tomorrow.  He can be reached at
408-299-1821.

George Waidelich
925-543-3801


Larry,
I have the State Rec Board and Kern County encroachment permit application
materials together. I also have the ACOE - 404 and RWQCB 401 information
ready for your review. You should receive all the packages tomorrow by
Fed-Ex.

I will e-mail the cover letters for you to modify as necessary and put on
your letterhead. I haven't formatted any headers or footers, as I assumed
you would have your own format style.

I need your input on a couple of questions/comments in order to finalize
things.

1) I have been listing the applicant as EOTT Energy Operating Limited
Partnership. Should I continue to list EOTT as the applicant, or should we
use Enron Transportation Services? I understand that the pipeline operator
will be Enron Pipeline Services Co.

2) Who should the local contact be? I've been using Kenny Maltby primarily
because Gary Fuller is gone, and Kenny knew what was happening from a
construction scheduling standpoint. Kenny now says that Scott Jones at the
North Coles Levee Gas Plant might possibly be the local contact. Or should
we use your name and office, as you may want to take the lead on dealing
with these agencies? Also, some of these applications/documents allow for an
agent (such as myself), but we may have to have signed authorizations in
order to do so.

3) It is my understanding that part of the overall Rogas project involves
the abandonment of an existing pipeline which travels in a separate location
through Kern Water Agency's groundwater recharge area. We may want to
address this in our application materials and get approvals as part of this
project, even though the active line may not be abandoned until a later
date. This line crosses the same bypass channel, and Kenny informed me that
they have an agreement with West Kern Water that they will remove all
abandoned lines unless they are in an "environmentally sensitive" area. This
allows you the option of capping the line on either side of the bypass
channel and leaving it in place. We would probably need the water district's
approval on this. If so, then we don't need to approach the ACOE, DFG,
RWQCB, State Reclamation Board, etc. Just something to consider. If we do
need to pull the abandoned line, we would have to go back to all these
agencies and get approvals again, pay fees, etc.

Call me to discuss at (805) 644-7976 or reply by e-mail. Thanks.


de nada

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdes, Maria
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:39 AM
To: Sturm, Fletcher J.; Kaniss, Jason; Ballato, Russell; Saibi, Eric;
Carson, Mike
Subject: RE: Regional Research Projects

Boys,

I'd be delighted to gather and format all of the information for a "nice and pretty" presentation. I would just ask that you e-mail me your info by the end of Wednesday, Feb. 6.

Gracias,
Maria

-----Original Message-----
From:	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Sent:	Wed 1/30/2002 1:49 PM
To:	Kaniss, Jason; Valdes, Maria; Ballato, Russell; Saibi, Eric; Carson, Mike
Cc:
Subject:	Regional Research Projects

All,

The unofficial word on the street is that deal closing is slated for Feb 7 and UBSWenergy launch is Feb 11.  Our intention is to launch financial products only for our regions beginning with Summer '02 through Cal '03.  As we are successful in signing up counterparties to reach a critical mass, we'll be adding products that are closer to the front of the curve (less correlated to NG.)  We need to do this to protect ourselves from "ambushes" by single parties when we don't have a critical mass of players that we can lay risk off with.

Please note that, as a result, we may "only" have a couple of more weeks to play with in terms of studying up and refreshing ourselves on the fundamentals in our respective regions.  Therefore, I'd like each of you to fill-in the information listed on the attached document for the region listed by your name.  Feel free to use any resources you need (fundies, etc.) and have them finished by next Thurs. (2/7).  Someone please nominate yourself to format each paper in the same manner and have them all put together in one binder nice and pretty.  Have a goodie.

Flet

	ECAR (Cinergy) - Krugh
	MAIN (ComEd) - Ave'
	SERC (TVA) - Jackie
	SERC (SOCO) - Twisty
	SPP (ENT) - New Boy


HOUSTON YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Arts & Entertainment Committee

- Presents-

Final Thursday

Thursday, September 20, 2001,

6:00-8:00 p.m.

- at -

Canyon Cafe

5000 Westheimer

Houston, Texas 77056

(713) 629-5565

Complimentary Drinks and Hors d'oeuvres
Free for HYLA members and $10 for non-members


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 05:02 PM
---------------------------

"Tom Marko" <tmarko@bspmlaw.com> on 10/25/2000 04:27:15 PM
To: <Don.miller@enron.com>
cc: "Robin Foster" <rfoster@bspmlaw.com>, <RFrantz@utilicorp.com>
Subject: Due Diligence Request.DOC

THIS E-MAIL WAS SENT BY AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.  THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
THIS E-MAIL IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE
OF THE ADDRESSEE(S) INDICATED ABOVE.  ANYONE WHO RECEIVES THIS E-MAIL IN
ERROR SHOULD NOTIFY THE SENDER BY TELEPHONE IMMEDIATELY AND DESTROY THE
ORIGINAL MESSAGE.

Attached, please find a due diligence request submitted by Blackwell Sanders
Peper Martin LLP on behalf of our client, Aquila.  Kindly note that if any of
the documents set forth on the attached list have already been provided to
Aquila, we will be happy to work directly with our client to obtain such
documents.  Thank you.

Thomas P. Marko, Esq.
Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
2300 Main Street, Suite 1000
Kansas City, MO  64108
Ph:  (816) 983-8267
Fax:   (816) 983-8080
tmarko@bspmlaw.com

 - DueDilig.DOC


I know that the basis, index and fx quotes have to be refreshed like any other deal before we execute a transaction, but what about the transport demand charges?  It seems like we should be done on those.  True or false?

Todd


Dear Sally,

Attached is the latest version of the summary.  It is complete, but I'm still
waiting for Scott E to let me know if anything has been done in Panama.

You mentioned yesterday that you wanted the offices rated.  I have put a
rating in, based on the number comments, size of the office, and severity of
the comments, and what I understand the general attitude of the office to be,
but you should probably take a look at it since you attended some of these
reviews.

Best regards

Shona


Linda,
 Try the transport group, Steve VanHooser, Gerald Nemec, Eric Gillaspie, and
maybe Shonnie Daniel.  I did not assign any transport contracts, especially
from HPl to ENA.

	Linda S Bryan
	04/11/2001 07:56 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Assignment Letter

Dan,

In the Global Contracts database, reference is made to an assignment letter
from HPLR to ECT eff. on 10/1/98 for a transportation contract with Texas
Utilities Fuel Company.  However, we have been unable to locate the paper
document.

I appreciate your help in locating this document.

Linda


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dikeman, Jeffrey [mailto:jeffrey.dikeman@agedwards.com]
Sent:	Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:01 AM
To:	Dikeman, Jeffrey
Subject:	ENERGY-Comments

 Please read 'THE HEDGER's' comments this morning on the current excuse in the market relating to an US attack on Iraq.......
DJ: POWELL SAYS NO PLANS FOR EARLY MILITARY ACTION VS IRAQ - FT
DJ: OPEC Min: Cartel seeks official Russia position on cuts
DJ: Russia lifts oil prdt exports through OPEC deal loophole
DJ: Khelil: Talks better than price war for OPEC, Russia
NG / Power
AGAs reported a DRAW 156 BCF in current storage levels...mildly bullish
DJ Market Talk: Maybe Ken Lay can get a skating judge job
DJ: House Republicans vie to keep electricity refrom alive
US Weather: Snow in the Rockies, Sierra Nevada

<<DAILY HEDGER.doc>>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: Since e-mail messages sent between you and A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. ("AGE") and its employees are transmitted over the Internet, AGE cannot assure that such messages are secure. You should be careful in transmitting information to AGE that you consider confidential. If you are uncomfortable with such risks, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with AGE. Although you may be sending an e-mail message to a specific AGE employee, other AGE employees may review such messages. Additionally, your e-mail messages to AGE may, consistent with AGE's regulatory requirements and retention policies, be retained. You should also be aware that e-mail messages may be delayed or undelivered. AGE does not accept orders to effect transactions or other similar instructions through e-mail messages.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I will not do as thorough a summary as Leslie has been providing, but below
are a few interesting items from Today's hearings:

1.  Update on testimony on Governor's proposal.  The governor's office
submitted their testimony. Basically it consisted of a letter from the
Governor urging its consideration, the same handouts passed out at the
workshop a week and a half ago (with a cover page slapped on it stating it
was testimony) and answers written out to the questions asked at the
workshop.  The governor's office is not at this time offering a sponsoring
witness.  The ALJ took statements as to whether the "testimony" should be
allowed into evidence.  PG&E was vehemently opposed; SCE was okay with it.

2.  The Commission's expert witnesses will take the stand tomorrow and
Wednesday morning.  The idea is that each of them will give an approximate
30 minute presentation, and then parties will have an opportunity to cross
on those statement.

2.  ORA witnesses took the stand.  A couple of interesting items came out of
Sean Casey's cross examination.  First, ORA has changed its position as to
the amortization of the March-June undercollection. They are now saying it
should be amortized over 12 months (rather than three).  Second, Sean Casey
would not testify that "as a general rule peak prices this summer would be
higher than off peak."  He stated that given the anomalies in the market
this past year, he could not testify to such a statement. Finally, with
respect to the direct access credit, he testified that irrespective of
whether DA customers pay the three cent surcharge, they should get it back
in the credit.

Jeanne Bennett


Nice move into third place, Dad.

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Eldon Sellers [mailto:eldon@interx.net]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:17 PM
To: Andre Mozes (E-mail); Art Narverud (E-mail); Barrie Eddy (E-mail 2);
Barrie Eddy (E-mail); bdouglas (JAM) (E-mail); Bill Growney (E-mail);
Cameron Sellers; Cameron Sellers (E-mail); Carlton Waters (E-mail);
CaryPlatkin (E-mail) (E-mail); Christopher J. Shea (E-mail 2); Christopher
J. Shea (E-mail); Cristina M. Shea (E-mail 2); Cristina M. Shea (E-mail);
Cynthia D. Nagy (E-mail); Daryl Anderson (E-mail); David Evans (E-mail);
Denis Kenny (E-mail); Donna Usnick (E-mail); Eldon (E-mail); Eldon Sellers
(E-mail) (E-mail); Greg Brady (E-mail); Henry Salvo Jr. (E-mail); Jeffrey
Dasovich (E-mail); John and Miriam Kartozian (E-mail); Ken Webster (E-mail);
Lynne Kenny (E-mail); Michael Herring (E-mail 2); Michael Lombardi (E-mail);
Mike Herring (E-mail) (E-mail); Nancy Sellers (E-mail); Pat Delong (E-mail
2); Pat Delong (E-mail); Prentice Sellers (E-mail 2); Prentice Sellers
(E-mail); Ron Taylor (E-mail); Scott Laughlin (E-mail); Sean Maloney
(E-mail); Steve McCarthy (E-mail)
Subject: SATURDAY GAMES ON WEEK 16 - GET YOUR PICKS IN!!  WEEK 15
RESULTSATTACHED.

<< File: Pick Sheet - Week 16.xls >> << File: 2000WK15final.xls >> Coming
into the stretch it's neck and neck between Cameron and Brady--only
one point apart.  And it's only 25 points between third and tenth.
Congratulations Pat for a great week; those were nice picks on the Bears and
Cowboys.  You're now the leading money winner for the year so far.  And the
Sheas, in the money for the fifth time--a record so far--came in second.
Third place for  the week goes to Cindy, who went from ninth to sixth place.
Dave, the only one of the four winners who put points on  the  49ers, came
in fourth but it looks like he learned from his mistake last week when he
put seven on Dallas instead of Washington this week.


guys, here's that info sheet we discussed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/24/2000 08:13 PM ---------------------------

Kirk McDaniel
10/22/99 05:19 PM
To: Scot Chambers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Project Eval Form

Scot

As per your request.


Somebody should check Drewlo's clothes for paint thinner.

CD


Attached is the final UCLA Anderson/CERA report.
;
Jennifer

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Moritzburke <PMoritzburke@CERA.com>@ENRON
Sent: Tue 7/17/2001 6:43 PM
To: Thome, Jennifer
Cc:
Subject: CERA paper

Jennifer,

Attached is the CERA paper on the economic impact of the California crisis.
It includes our updated analysis following the June 19 FERC Order. The paper
is now available on the Western Energy website as well.

Please call with any questions.

Peter

************************************************

Peter F. Moritzburke

Cambridge Energy Research Associates

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 950

Oakland, CA 94612

p (510)874-4383

f (510)874-4347

************************************************

;

;- CA_Short_Circuit_0701.pdf <<CA_Short_Circuit_0701.pdf>>


my bid is 3.61

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Santiago
Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	Andex volumes for NYMEX bid

Dutch,

Attached you will find the volumes for your NYMEX bid.

Thanks.

Santiago

 << File: NYMEX Volumes 062001.xls >>


I  think you ought to do a bit of hand holding to help Randy complete this.
For example, we know the type of derivative, the specific investment type and
a lot of the other information called for by the form. I really think you'll
spend less time working on this if you sit down with Randy and help him
prepare the form. Also, Randy needs some guidance on what sort of description
of the underlying investment is appropriate. I'm sure Randy can attach
something in his file that works just fine (as opposed to preparing something
for this). Also, you and Randy need to discuss how the fairness opinion is
used and whether it's provided to LJM to help support the swap price. Thanks!

Gordon McKillop@ENRON
09/26/2000 09:36 AM
To: Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

To follow up on Scott's message below.  The attached proposal sheet has the
entity information for the Raptor II structure.  The proposal sheet should
contain the information that is necessary to support the confirm.  The asset
description should describe the business or entity.  A specific description
of the underlying investment and interest in should also be included.  Under
the detail of the derivative include the type (at the money price return
swap, put, call...), term, legal name, specific investment type (type of
stock, warrant ...), initial price, initial shares, initial notional value.
The valuation support should be attached with the proposal sheet.  For this
transaction, there is no premium calculation since the swap is at the money.

Please provide this information to Sara and me.  I will distribute the
information to Ryan and Scott.  After the confirm is completed, I will submit
the information to the counterparty for approval.

Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Gordon

Scott Sefton@ECT
09/26/2000 08:37 AM
To: Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: URGENT -- Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Randy,

Hedges in the Raptor structure require that a Proposal Sheet be submitted to
the counterparty to the swap (the counterparty is owned by an outside
investor and our agreement with them requires this). Attached to Mary's email
below is the Raptor Derivative Proposal Sheet that the business unit will
need to submit. Gordon is responsible for this process and can answer any
questions you have.

Also attached below is a Raptor Securities/Confidentiality Response Form that
ENA legal prepared to help them conduct a due diligence exercise on their
merchant assets being hedged to confirm that there were no contractual or
other legal restrictions that may affect their ability to enter into the
swap. Although  many of the items on this form won't be relevant to what
you're hedging, I thought it may be helpful. Because we're not familiar with
the assets or any South American legal issues that may apply, we'll be
looking to you for confirmation that there aren't any issues in this regard.

You can ignore the document entitled Raptor Process for Inclusion of Swaps
into Raptor Vehicles.

Please call me or Gordon if you have any questions. Thanks!

Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 08:19
AM ---------------------------

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 06:38 PM
To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

We can discuss tomorrow, but the swap group is not staffed either to fulfill
the coordination of all the work in respect of the underlying assets.  Do you
have alternative ideas?

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Scott Sefton
	09/25/2000 06:34 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H
Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

Although I'm happy to discuss this at our meeting tomorrow, I don't think the
draft process document describes a role for Global Finance legal that we can
properly fulfill.

MARY COOK
09/25/2000 02:14 PM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope
Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Papers for Raptor Meeting Tuesday

See attached for your review prior to meeting, Tuesday 9:30 38C1.  Thanks.
Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Wants to get a clearer sense of your thinking on this issue prior to his trip to London 9/10.


Barry,

My name is Alisha Mahabir and I have been working on negotiating the MGI/ENA GISB.  I have been in contact with Lourdes Cervantes at MGI; her phone number is 525-232-5990.  There are still a few issues left to be resolved before we can proceed with the execution of this document.  Per Geral Nemec's request, I will outline these changes as they are addressed in Exhibit B to the GISB that was sent over by Lourdes.

Initially I want to note that some changes must be made to the front page of the GISB.  MGI has previously agreed to allow ENA to be the confirming party under Section 2.5.  Additionally, there have been a few problems with allowing payment to be made on the 30th day of the month.  It appears that MGI has been construing this provision broadly so as to make payment on the 2nd day of March after a short month in February.  Thus, we would like Section 7.2 to read "30th day or, for the Month of February, on the last day of the Month".

As for Exhibit B, the changes are as follows:

#4 The words "or interruptible" should be deleted from this provision.  The interruptible language conflicts with the ability to do 30 day firm deals under this contract.

#11 This provision deals with when notices are deemed received.  The provision as written provides that notice by first class mail is deemed received 2 business days after mailing.  MGI would like to change this to allow for receipt to mean actual receipt.  Lourdes told me that she will check to see whether the change can be stricken or at least to extend 2 business days to 3 business days.

#12 (a) MGI has agreed to strike the term "letter" from the requirement that the Parent issue a guarantee should doubt arise as to Enron's ability to pay.
      (b)  Originally the GISB provides that a contract can be terminated without prior notice should certain conditions be met.  MGI wants to change this to require the parties to provide 48 hours notice.  Lourdes told me that she would check to see whether this could be changed to 24 hours prior notice.

#16  The language designating ICC is acceptable, however any redundant language should be stricken.

If this memo is at all unclear, please feel free to call me.  My extension is 52722.

Alisha Mahabir


Your not going to bed at 5:00 tonight because you will be getting your ass
kicked in Tennis tonight.  Tennis anyone?
Ben


The Global Government Affairs department meeting has been cancelled.

Thanks and please call me if you have any questions.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ray; Assad, Sergio; Assaf, Lisa; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Bestard, Jose; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Braz, Gisele; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Cooper, Adam N; Crowther, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Davies, Philip; Dawson, Paul; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Elms, Nick; Fitzgibbon, Tom; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Grimes, Michael; Guerrero, Janel; Haizmann, Jan; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hennemeyer, Paul; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Huertas, Alfredo; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hughes, Llewelyn; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Imai, Makiko; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keenan, Amber; Keene, Patrick; Kimura, Takashi; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Milano, Pamela; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reis, Jose Lucio; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Sampaio, Fred; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Styles, Peter; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Van Biert, Teun; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Watanabe, Mika; Wood, Doug; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Global Government Affairs December Department Meeting

I want to update everyone on the next Global Government Affairs Department Meeting.  It will take place as previously scheduled.  See below for details:

Location:	The Woodlands Country Club
		2301 North Millbend Drive
		The Woodlands, TX  77380
		281-367-1100

Date:		December 6, 2001 (Departmental Dinner at the The Woodlands Country Club)
Time:		6:30 PM (CST)

Date:		December 7, 2001 (Department Meeting)
Time:		8:00 AM - 4:00 PM

I have a block of rooms reserved for overnight guests.  Please let me know of your plans to attend, the date you will be arriving, and I will reserve a room for you.

I will update everyone with more details as soon as I get them.

Thanks and look forward to seeing everyone next month.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


Hey man, our new address is:
4435 Sterling Wood Way
Houston, TX  77059

PL


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041504.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   3.80 / Final:   3.36)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: SierraPowe
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  UNIT_ID: VESTAL_6_WDFIRE

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: -65.00 / Final: -45.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:  70.00 / Final:  50.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:  28.41 / Final:  28.40)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I haven't sent it yet.


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************

A new SCIENTECH PowerHitter interview with E. Linn Draper, Chairman,
President,
and CEO of American Electric Power, is now available.  Find out more at:
http://www.consultrci.com
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 18, 2000
Fuel Cells Get Financial Boost from U.S. Government
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

The Department of Energy will have more than $100 million for fuel cell
related programs in the new fiscal year, $10 million above the president's
request. The money is contained in the Interior Appropriation bill that
President Clinton signed last week. The House and Senate jointly agreed
upon $52.7 million for stationary fuel cells, $10 million more than requested,
and approved the full request of $41.5 million for transportation fuel
cell research and $5.5 million for buildings.

ANALYSIS: This government funding, which is surprisingly higher than expected,
should give a much-needed boost to the slow-moving development of fuel
cells. Although generally considered the favorite of low / zero emission
energy solutions, fuel cells are still about two to three years away from
being commercially viable in retail markets. (Phosphoric acid fuel cells,
developed by ONSI, a division of United Technologies, are presently available
in a limited capacity). The technology has been in existence ever since
batteries were discovered 160 years ago, but the high cost of producing
them has precluded suppliers from making fuel cells readily available to
the general public. Automotive giants like DaimlerChrysler and Ford Motor
Co. have continued to explore the use of fuel cells in automobiles, and
Texaco, Inc. agreed in May to invest $67.2 million in Energy Conversion
Devices, a 40-year-old fuel cell and alternative energy development firm.
Yet, this financial support for the DOE's exploration of fuel cells signals
significant support from the federal government. In addition, warnings
about the high cost of oil and natural gas, and the reports of low supplies
of energy in states across the country, continue to scare energy end-users
and may be spurring a renewed interest in distributed generation options.

Here's how fuel cells work. They use an electrochemical reaction, as opposed
to traditional combustion, to generate electricity. In other words, fuel
cells allow hydrogen-rich fuels to react chemically with air, without burning,
producing as a byproduct DC electricity, water and heat. In addition, fuel
cells dramatically lower the level of pollutants that are emitted into
the environment. Test models of fuel cells presently convert methanol,
gasoline and natural gas to produce hydrogen fuel. It's easiest to think
of a fuel cell as a battery, but one that does not run down or need recharging
(although it will need replacing about every five years). A fuel cell will
produce energy in the form of DC electricity and heat as long as fuel is
supplied. As an added advantage, fuel cells can be controlled remotely
by computer and run rather quietly. This is perhaps the primary incentive
for end-users that would be interested in fuel cell technology. Especially
for facilities like hospitals, the attributes of low noise and near-zero
pollution are very appealing.

Currently, fuel cells are being tested and developed by laboratories and
think tanks around the world, hoping to make this low-polluting form of
generation available for widespread use by 2002 or 2003. Under the DOE
grant, money provided for stationary fuel cells will fund research and
development to reduce costs and improve performance. It is hoped that this
will lead to market-ready fuel cell power systems within three years. In
addition, the funding allocates $41.5 million to transportation fuel cell
research such as integrating fuel cell stacks with fuel processors and
balance-of-plant technologies for testing. This program also will examine
the technology barriers to fuel-flexible systems for automobile applications.
The $5.5 million reserved for buildings will go toward developing a prototype
fuel processor, completing the design competition for a 50kW co-generator
for buildings, and other research and development.

Deregulation has cast light on alternative forms of power supply. As customers
possibly decide to use on-site generation as opposed to power delivered
across a transmission grid, this dramatically alters the traditional business
of most energy companies. Large commercial and industrial customers that
suddenly opt for fuel cell solutions to their energy needs would have dramatic
financial impact on their incumbent energy provider. As a result, many
electric utilities and energy providers are investing in fuel cells as
a hedge against a possible shrinkage within their own supply businesses.
Southern Company is a good example. Just this month, Southern joined Alabama
Municipal Electric Authority, Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc., and
FuelCell Energy in a partnership to "drive a growing interest in fuel cell
technology." Specifically, Southern is providing funding for a fuel cell
plant to be located in the service territory of Alabama Power, a Southern
subsidiary. The plant will convert pipeline natural gas into electricity
at a reported efficiency of about 50 percent, compared with 33 percent
for conventional generation, which will feed the power distribution system
of Mercedes-Benz.

Another example is Enron, which just two weeks ago entered into an alliance
with FuelCell Energy, Inc., to develop and market FuelCell Energy's Direct
FuelCell products, focusing on state renewable and energy conservation
programs. As part of the partnership, Enron is investing about $5 million
in the common stock of FuelCell Energy. In its announcement of the
partnership,
Enron stated that "the transaction enables us to reach the developing markets
for clean energy and renewable energy, which may be served through distributed
generation products, such as fuel cells."

These are just two examples of many energy companies that are devoting
money to fuel cells and other forms of distributed generation. Some state
regulatory commissions have debated whether or not to allow utilities to
own their own distributed generation equipment technologies. As a result,
we are seeing a trend of utilities investing in companies that are already
developing distributed generation solutions, instead of doing it themselves.

The investment appears to be a smart one. According to Stephens, Inc.,
an investment banking firm, common industry projections put the potential
for the automotive fuel cell market at $50 billion annually by 2020 and
as high as $100 billion (cumulative) for the stationary power markets within
10 years. The increase is due in large part to the growth of Internet-based
industry and the need for mission-critical systems at dot-com operations.
Microturbines*small generators that can produce enough power for a small
business*have beaten fuel cells to market and are currently manufactured
by the likes of Capstone, Caterpillar and Solar Turbines. Microturbines
reportedly could be potentially superior to fuel cells with regard to low
emissions. Many energy companies and power marketers such as Williams,
Alliant Energy and American Energy Savings have made announcements just
within the last month that they will market microturbines to customers.
Yet, the distributed generation market should become much tighter once
fuel cells become commercially available, something that this hefty new
grant from the U.S. government should push forward.

===============================================================
El Paso Global Networks plans to spend up to $2 billion in the next few
years on telecom acquisitions. Find out more about SCIENTECH'S
Telecommunications
InfoGrid at:
http://www.consultrci.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Gary .

 Attached is the previously discussed GISB.  If you are in agreement with this version,  please print two documents for execution sign, and forward to me for final signature.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


If anyone is interested in taking a Corporate Finance course tomorrow and Friday, let me know -- I am signed up, but my plate is looking very full for the next few days...

Ayesha