We are pleased to announce the creation of a new group - Asset Marketing -
within Enron Americas. The Asset Marketing group will have responsibility for
the asset divestment function within Enron Americas and work with Generation
Investments on selected portfolio acquisitions as well as managing power
origination funding requirements with Treasury.

Don Miller will head the Asset Marketing group and will report directly to
the Office of the Chair, Enron Americas. Joining Don's group will be Stuart
Zisman.  Stuart was formerly in ENA Legal, having most recently worked on the
sale of ENA's peaker plants with Don.

Please join us in congratulating Don and Stuart in their new roles.


This is a great time to be at Enron. The challenges and opportunities at
Enron seem to be expanding with every passing day.  This presents enormous
challenges for Government Affairs as a group and for each of us
individually.  As we discussed at the staff meeting last month, this requires
us to constantly reevaluate our priorities, our methods of getting things
done, and whether our organization is properly structured to meet the needs
of the entire company.  While we have done an outstanding job as a group
within our current structure, changes are necessary at this time.

The primary change in the organizational structure is to complete the
assignments for and reinforce the leadership roles of the individuals within
the group who have primary responsibility for setting the Government Affairs
strategy and agenda for the respective Enron operating companies.  The below
mentioned individuals will have the following responsibilities:

1. Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets:  Jim Steffes
2. The Enron Energy Services Group of Companies:  Harry Kingerski
3. Enron Broadband Services:  Sue Nord
4. Enron Global Markets and Enron Networks:  Lisa Yoho
5. Enron South America:  Jose Bestard
6. Federal Government Affairs:  Linda Robertson

With the impending retirement on March 31, 2001 of Joe Hillings, I am pleased
to announce that Linda Robertson will be joining the office on November 6,
2000, as a Vice President who will immediately assume responsibility for
leading the Federal Government Affairs group in our Washington office.  Linda
was a Congressional staffer and partner/principal in two Washington law firms
prior to spending the last eight years with the U.S. Department of Treasury,
the last five as Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs and Public
Liaison, for Secretaries Rubin & Summers.  Linda brings a terrific
background, both in energy and financial services, and is a welcome addition
to our team.  In order to more effectively integrate the Government Affairs
groups and strategy in Washington, the Federal Regulatory Affairs group under
Joe Hartsoe,s direction will also report to Linda.  Joe Hartsoe will also
retain primary responsibility for NERC activities, although Charles Yeung and
Dick Ingersoll will have a dotted line reporting relationship to Jim Steffes
in his capacity of directing our activities for ENA.  Ray Alvarez will be
transferring from his current role with Transredes in Bolivia during the 1st
quarter of 2001 and will join the Federal Regulatory Affairs group, reporting
to Joe Hartsoe.

On a personal note, I would like to acknowledge the significant contributions
that Joe Hillings has made to this company in his eighteen years of service.
Joe,s work ethic, intellect, and integrity have established Enron as a
company that is respected throughout Washington.  I will have more to say
about this as Joe,s retirement draws closer, but I look to him to be a vital
part of the leadership transition in our Washington office that will occur
over the next days and weeks.

I will be relying heavily on the above-identified six individuals to ensure
that Government Affairs is firmly embedded within each of our operating
companies; that we as a group thoroughly understand their current business
strategies as well as new directions they may be taking in the future; and,
most importantly, to thoroughly understand how our organization can
contribute and add value to each of these companies on a continuing basis.
Communicating that understanding on a regular basis to the rest of the
Government Affairs organization and developing a Government Affairs wide
execution strategy will be a key objective for each of these individuals.

In order to ensure the success of these individuals and the Government
Affairs organization; the following changes are being made.

In addition to his leadership role with Government Affairs on behalf of the
EES group of companies, Harry Kingerski will continue to head up the
rates/regulatory group, now renamed Government Affairs Support Services.
This group will continue to provide valuable technical support services
throughout Government Affairs and will be expanding its scope of expertise
over the next months to some of the new markets that the company has and will
soon be entering.  Nancy Hetrick and Vinio Floris will join this organization
and report to Harry.
Jeff Brown, Tom Delaney, Mary Hain, Ron McNamara, Christi Nicolay, Thane
Twiggs, and Steve Walton will now report to Jim Steffes in his role
supporting Enron North America and Enron Industrial Markets. Alberto Levy
will be relocating from our Caracas, Venezuela office and will also report to
Jim.  A couple of special mentions:  Jeff Brown has done an outstanding job
in leading the CUBR (Coalition for Uniform Business Rules) process over the
last year and his current leadership of the Midwest ISO and Alliance RTO
efforts for Enron will be critical to the development of well functioning
wholesale electric markets in the U.S.  It is also my hope that Steve Walton
will play an increased leadership role across North America on wholesale
electric market issues.  The incredible knowledge that Steve Walton possesses
of the electric industry, coupled with his industry-wide credibility, will
provide much needed support to our wholesale electric market reform efforts
across North America.
Tom Hoatson will now report to Steve Montovano in his new role in supporting
the company,s efforts at PJM.  Tom will also continue to be an
organization-wide resource on technical issues regarding generation
interconnection and distributed generation.  Kathleen Sullivan has recently
joined Steve,s group from Azurix and will be primarily assisting Howard
Fromer in New York.
Sue Nord will head up the group that supports EBS.  Scott Bolton and Donald
Lassere, while reporting to Sue, will continue to provide leadership on
telecommunications issues.  Scott and Donald have done outstanding work and
will continue to be integral to our efforts in this area.
Finally, the Resource Commitment Review (RCR) process, beginning 1/1/01, will
be extended to all of Government Affairs in North America, including Federal
Government Affairs and Mexico.  The RCR Committee, beginning immediately,
will be expanded and will consist of Harry Kingerski, Sue Nord,  Linda
Roberston, Jim Steffes, Lisa Yoho & myself.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Thank you


Thanks for the reply.  I found it on her desk!

Kay

From: Vanessa Bob on 03/28/2001 10:22 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Misha Siegel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Question

Kay:

What's the name of the organization that would have sent the form in?

Vanessa

	Laura Schwartz
	03/28/2001 10:10 AM

		 To: Misha Siegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Bob/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Question

----- Forwarded by Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron on 03/28/2001 10:09 AM -----

	Kay.Mann@enron.com
	03/26/2001 02:13 PM

		 To: community-relations@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Question

Hi there,

I participated in an FFA auction with Matagorda County Fair, and gave my
assistant the receipts to fill out the matching forms.  Unfortunately, she
has since had surgery and isn't in the office.  The receipts are no longer
on her desk, and the current temporary assistant doesn't know anything
about it.  I was wondering whether a prior temp might have sent them in.
Please let me know.

Thanks,

Kay Mann
x57566


FYI
 Jim Derrick

-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Mark (London Legal) <mark.evans@enron.com>
To: Harris, Stephanie J  <Stephanie.Harris@ENRON.com>; Derrick Jr., James <James.Derrick@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Nov 19 03:01:14 2001
Subject: RE: BAKER & McKENZIE

Jim,

B&M are our lead firm in Japan, and are used extensively by Jane McBride, and also on a more sporadic basis by businesses in London (eg metals and the Wind business) which have operations in Japan. Enron Wind in Japan have appointed Paul Davies of B&M in Tokyo to act on a joint venture for Enron Wind in Japan.

In the summer of 2000, we undertook some basic physical gas due diligence re gas in the Ukraine utilising Baker & McKenzie's Kiev office.  This was in preparation for a potential long-term gas deal to get gas out of the Ukraine to the Romanian border (for onward sale in Romania / Poland).  B&M was the only "recognised" firm in the Ukraine.

That's it.

							Mark

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Harris, Stephanie J
	Sent:	14 November 2001 20:29
	To:	#99 Tech Support,; Ale, John; Alvis, Connie; Braden, Erica; Cartier, Autumn; Cheek, Charles; Dapolite, Gail; Dodgen, Kathy; Elbertson, Janette; Esparza, Elaine; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Forsyth, Darlene C.; Fossum, Drew; Foy, Tracy; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hicks, Debra; Jebousek, Diana; Johnson, Kelly; Kumbalek, Lisa M.; Labanowski, Elizabeth; Lawless, Michelle; Lewis, Karen; Manly, Marc; Mintz, Jordan; Mordaunt, Kristina; Murray, Tanja; Newell, Eric; Nichols, Douglas; Place, Janet; Raybon, Betsy; Rieker, Paula; Rogers, Rex; Sample, Molly; Sellers, Emily; Sharp, Vicki; Wallace, Stephen; Walls Jr., Rob
	Subject:	MESSAGE FROM JIM DERRICK

	Please let me know what matters you currently have or have had within the last two years, with the law firm of Baker & McKenzie.

	Please let me know promptly.

	Jim Derrick


This is the Southern docket on what contracts have to be filed at FERC!

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

NOTICE OF CHANGE IN MEETING

(December 8, 2000)

 Upon the affirmative vote of Chairman Hoecker and Commissioners Massey,

Breathitt, and H,bert, the following Docket Nos. and Company have been  added
to

Item CAE-2 on the Commission meeting scheduled for December 13, 2000:

Item No. Docket No. and Company

CAE-2 ER00-2998-001, ER00-2999-001, ER00-3000-001 and ER00-3001-001, Southern
Company Services, Inc.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
01:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           12/11/2000 09:55 AM

To: Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Orders/Notices/California Investigation

Can you look on the FERC web page and see what the Southern docket below
relates to?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000
08:38 AM ---------------------------

"Nancy Pickover" <npickover@bracepatt.com> on 12/11/2000 09:25:33 AM
To: <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>, <donna.fulton@enron.com>,
<marcie.milner@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Orders/Notices/California Investigation

Please see attached notices.  Please note that a special meeting has been
scheduled for the California Investigation on Friday, Dec. 15 at 10:00.  At
this time that the matter is still set for discussion on Dec. 13 during the
normal meeting.  I will follow up with this as well as finding out if the
Friday meeting is being televised and will let you know.

 - CA12-08.1


---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 10:22 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           11/27/2000 10:21 AM

To: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: HMPC

Enron Fuels International (EFI) has a long term gasoil supply agreement with
HMPC which has not been used for several years. What is the current and
future status of the plant? If the plant is not going to operate and not need
liquid fuel deliveries, then I need someone within HMPC to send a formal
notice to EFI cancelling the fuel supply contract. We have requested this
several times over the past few years to no avail.


The meeting today has been rescheduled to 11:00 am in Room : ECS 06980.

Kind regards,

Karen.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Karen
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: Meeting - Tuesday 10 am

A 10:00 am meeting has be tentatively scheduled for you Tuesday, location to be confirmed, to discuss the Analyst & Associate Program as it relates to UBS.

Kind regards,

Karen Buckley

Human Resources

Tel: 713 345 4667


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 11:43
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Executive Compensation Department @ ENRON
11/28/2000 06:03 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Eligible Employees
cc:
Subject: Deferral Enrollment 2001

The annual deferral program enrollment process is underway.  Enron's Bonus
Stock Option and Bonus Phantom Stock Programs provide you with an opportunity
to receive stock options and phantom stock in lieu of all or a portion of the
cash bonus you may receive during 2001.

To make enrollment even more convenient for you, this year's deferral program
information is available on eHRonline.  To learn more about your deferral
program opportunities and to enroll for 2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at
http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you
need your ID or password to access the system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

If you would like to attend an employee meeting to learn more about these
programs, following is a list of meeting dates, times, and locations:

Wednesday, November 29  2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.   EB 5C2
Monday, December 4   9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.  The Forum (2 Allen Center, 12th
Fl.)
Tuesday, December 5   2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.   EB 5C2
Wednesday, December 6   2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.   EB 5C2

Since seating is limited, please RSVP (leave a message for Diana Gutierrez
(713-345-7077) confirming your name, phone number, and the meeting you wish
to attend).

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


A few more...

 - pauserefreshes.jpg
 - niceartlady.jpg
 - noparking.jpg
 - ouch.jpg
 - bad2thebone.jpg
 - raceincentive.jpg
 - rockclimber.jpg
 - sorryflowers.jpg
 - touristattraction.jpg
 - whichwaytogo.jpg


At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement for each of Amerex Natural Gas I, Ltd. and Amerex
Power, Ltd.  Please call me at (713) 853-3399 or Bob at (713) 853-0397  if
you have any comments or questions.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
01:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           03/07/2000 12:43 PM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@halliburton.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, apena26@hotmail.com, Pamela
Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com, mcastillo@metromkt.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Friendship!

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
12:40 PM ---------------------------
From: Brenda Barreda@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/06/2000 04:46 PM
To: MY BUDDIES, Iracema Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: FW: Friendship!

---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2000 04:46 PM ---------------------------
From: Andrea R Guillen@ECT on 03/02/2000 08:52 AM
Sent by: Andrea R Guillen@ECT
To: Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, emartinez@vantagemed.com, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: FW: Friendship!

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
08:49 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           03/02/2000 08:46 AM

To: Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alisha Guerrero/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Friendship!

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
08:41 AM ---------------------------

Jackie Martinez <jmartinez@HAJS.com> on 03/02/2000 08:23:20 AM
To: Sandra Moran <smoran@HAJS.com>, gchavez@fibichandgarth.com,
esoto2@enron.com, TMR@wkpz.com, lkelly@gbltx.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Friendship!

-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvia Salazar [mailto:SSalazar@brsfirm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 8:20 AM
To: 'JMARTINEZ@HAJS.COM'
Subject: FW: Friendship!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheri Burt
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:32 PM
To: Belinda Powell (E-mail 2); Belinda Powell (E-mail 3); Brandy Thomas
(E-mail); 'Brooks'; 'Carolyn'; Cecilia McCloyn; Donna Meyn; 'Edna
Taylor'; Darlene Camacho (E-mail); Gayle Russell; Jennifer Nash; Jeryl
Golub (E-mail); 'Kim C.'; 'Lambchop'; Laura Gauss; Leigh Bivin; Lenore
Chomout; 'Leopard LISA'; 'Lover & Mike'; 'Marty O'; 'Mary A Weitzel';
Mary Cheline; 'Michele'; Michelle Bultman; Nichole Moore (E-mail);
Sylvia Salazar; Darrell Clapp (E-mail); 'TPC'; Vicky Hamon; Terrie
Flora; Gayette Eicher; Charlotte James; Nicole Batey; Donna Magnusson
Subject: FW: Friendship!

Some of this doesn't apply, like how we met, but the rest of it does.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheri Burt
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:28 PM
To: 'JayX'
Subject: FW: Friendship!

 - message.HTM


Dear Mark,

Thanks for the invite.  Definitely next week.

Can you look at deal # 500822.  Coral says t. vining talked to you for a sale
of 40MW but we have it in EnPower and Inc sheet at 70MW.
Please advise.

Thanks,

Virginia


Julie,

We received the shipment of 50 books. Thanks.

The book was an instant hit. We need 50 more books.

Vince

P.S. I understand Paul sent you the check for the remaining 50%


Sara,

Paul wants to know if we have any objections to the attached form of
confirmation.  Please let me know if you have any concerns.  Thank you!
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Paul Pizzolato                           07/31/2000 09:32 AM

To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TR Bond Swap Confirmation

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Pizzolato/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000
09:22 AM ---------------------------

Greg.Mackay@ubsw.com on 07/27/2000 01:48:39 PM
To: paul.pizzolato@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TR Bond Swap Confirmation

     Paul,
     Please find attached a blank template Bond Total Return Swap Master
     Confirm and the adjoining Supplemental Confirm.  It has been updated
     to take three hours for you to accept or reject the Market Value set
     by the Calculation Agent.
     Please call with any questions or concerns.  Hope to get a trade on
     ASAP.

     Thanks and Regards,

     Greg MacKay

 - ect_supp.doc
 - ect_ma~1.doc

This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.


Due to the size of this possible transaction, I thought I would keep you in
the loop on its status.

We submitted a bid with caveats as to its non-binding nature, and suggested
an alternative structure.  In response, Navigant issued questions. John
Llodra has compiled answers, which appear to be fine to me.

 We  (Legal) have been instructed to standby, awaiting commercial guidance as
to whether we will be going forward.  I believe Klauberg has either cleared
conflicts or initiated the process, so if we go forward, he should be our man.

I will let you know once a go/no go decision is reached.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 10:53
AM ---------------------------

John Llodra
05/15/2001 10:44 AM
To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: first cut at responses to Navigant questions on NiMO proposal

see attached first draft of responses.  please get me any comments by COB
today as i need to submit by 10 AM tomorrow.  Paul/ed - please look at my
response relating to credit terms to make sure you're OK with this.  thanks

John


Gerald,

I just received a copy of the revised LIG invoice from Bob Walker.  They are now billing Bridgeline for the amount owed.  I am concerned that Bob states in the letter that I provided Bridgeline's costs on their behalf.

Any thoughts as to what this might open up?
Thanks,
Karen


Danielle and I are having an open-house this coming Saturday.

When:  	Saturday, October 20, 2:00 pm - till whenever

Address: 	7527 Ashton Dr.
		Houston, Tx 77095

Phone: 		281.345.6790

Directions 	Take 290 West, from 610 (approximately 12 miles) and exit Hwy 6
		Turn left (under 290) on Hwy 6.
		Drive through four or five stop lights (aproximately 2.5 miles)
		Turn right on Longenbaugh (a stop light intersection).
		At the third stop sign, Royal Gardens turn Left
		Drive through two stop signs, and
		Ashton will be the third street on your right.
		Turn right onto Ashton (you can only turn right)
		We are the 5th house on the Left, 7527 Ashton Dr.

We are asking people to bring soda or juice as finger foods will be provided.

Neil


A D V E R T I S E M E N T [IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	career center      seminars      legal newswire      customer service      free email
 October 26, 2001

[IMAGE]   Ford Settles Ignition Suit; Could Cost Automaker $2.7 Billion  The Associated Press Ford Motor Co. agreed Thursday to reimburse current and former owners for repairs on millions of cars and trucks prone to stall because of a flawed ignition system. The deal approved by a California judge could cost the automaker $2.7 billion, plaintiffs said. The settlement was approved as the beleaguered automaker weathers a series of setbacks, including an erosion in sales and the costly Firestone tire situation.   Full Text     Coming Down Hard  Miami Daily Business Review Legal activists, criminal defense lawyers and journalists are decrying a package of anti-terrorism bills under consideration by the Florida Senate, saying the proposed legislation attacks the First and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution and seriously constricts the state's traditionally permissive open records. Legislators, however, defended the proposals as "narrowly drawn."  Full Text     Michigan Lawyers Clash Over Bench Balance  The National Law Journal Michigan plaintiffs' lawyers charge that decisions by Michigan appellate courts have strongly favored insurers, manufacturers and big business in general since Republican Gov. John Engler took office with promises of tort reform. As a result of new legislation and more conservative judges, they allege, the climate for plaintiffs' lawyers in Michigan has become the worst of any state in the nation.  Full Text    Part-Time Lawyer Sues Harvey Pennington Firm for Four Years' Back Wages  American Lawyer Media A respected employment attorney who until last summer worked in the New York office of Harvey, Pennington, Cabot, Griffith & Renneisen has sued the Philadelphia-based firm in federal court in New York, seeking nearly four years of backpay. The case represents an employment dispute between parties who themselves are sophisticated experts in the field of employment law. The firm disputes Michel Lee's billing practices. Full Text    9th Circuit Limits Prior Owner's CERCLA Liability  The Recorder The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 8-3 Wednesday that landowners who once owned contaminated property but did nothing to contribute to its contamination aren't liable for cleanup costs. In the closely watched environmental law case, the court reversed an earlier three-judge panel decision holding so-called intervening landowners liable for cleanup costs. Full Text    ADVERTISEMENT  Free Monitor with the purchase of a NetVista!  Get a Free IBM 15" (13.8" viewable) Monitor with the purchase of any NetVista system (excluding X Series)! See special savings on upgrades, as well. This offer is in addition to the standard ABA Member Advantage 10% discount. To receive your 10% discount (and take advantage of this offer), either call  800-426-7235, extension 5242 or  click here .  Hurry, this offer ends 11/5/2001!  Shipping and handling not included. Offer valid in the US, through November 5, 2001. Limit one promotion per qualifying purchase. Limit 5 per customer.   Pennsylvania Bar Exam Nets 71.8 Percent Pass Rate  The Legal Intelligencer For the 1,313 law school graduates who took the Pennsylvania Bar Exam in July, months of poring over treaties and texts paid off. The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners announced that 71.8 percent of applicants who sat for the July test successfully completed the exam with test scores of equal to or greater than 272 for the combined multistate bar exam and essay/multistate performance. Full Text    [IMAGE]   La Vida Lawyer: The Tenor of Tempranillo  law.com From inhospitable terrain, intolerable heat and enduring cold, springs the Tempranillo vine, the very vertebra of Spanish wine. La Vida Lawyer gives the historically overlooked Spanish wine its due, focusing on the delicious bargains found in the Ribera del Duero and Priorat regions. From there we board the latest Porsche Carrera coupe and set off at high speed to high culture: The Hague.  Full Text    ADVERTISEMENT  FREE  Acrobat Legal Solutions CD!  Beat your court filing deadlines. Acrobat 5.0 makes it easy to create Adobe PDF files for e-filing, document review...and so much more. Purchase Acrobat 5.0 by November 30, 2001, and get the FREE  Acrobat Legal Solutions CD, a valuable resource that includes a step-by-step demonstration on how to create and assemble documents for e-filing.  Click here .   The Ukrainian Connection  The Recorder After the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukrainian Pavel Lazarenko rose from lowly engineer to prime minister of his country. But his meteoric rise ended when he fled corruption charges leveled by Ukrainian officials. Now being held in a U.S. federal detention center, Lazarenko will ask a federal judge in San Francisco today to rule that he cannot be prosecuted in the U.S. for events that took place half a world away. Full Text     Duty and Loss  The National Law Journal Craig D. Bell is the chairman of tax litigation at Richmond, Va.'s McGuireWoods, but he's also a lieutenant colonel and judge advocate general in the U.S. Army Reserves. After the Sept. 11 attack on the Pentagon, the government assembled lawyers like Bell to guide the survivors through a thicket of legal issues, from accessing a dead spouse's bank account to determining child custody to finalizing an estate. Full Text    [IMAGE]   Hold on '.biz' Domain Names Lifted  The Associated Press A preliminary injunction entered by a California court holding up to as many as 58,000 Internet addresses ending in ".biz" will be lifted after the plaintiffs in a suit over domain name registration procedures failed to come up with the required bond. Although NeuLevel Inc., the operator of ".biz," denies that it ran an illegal lottery, the Los Angeles-based company may nevertheless revise its registration procedures. Full Text Visit the Tech Law Practice Center    ADVERTISEMENT  RealLegal Binder?  RealLegal Application Solutions No more manual note taking during a proceeding! Concentrate on the strategies and arguments you need to make to win your case with Binder's realtime features. Take the unedited realtime transcripts and your electronic notes back to the office to begin work immediately. Then synchronize your unedited version with the final transcript and maintain the electronic notes you took during the proceeding.  Click here  for a free, no-obligation 30-day trial.    You may unsubscribe from the Legal Newswire at any time by sending an e-mail message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject e-mail. To unsubscribe, click here .  Questions? Comments? Complaints? Send us e-mail    By using law.com's Legal Newswire, you are agreeing to abide by our Terms of Service.   (c) 2001 law.com 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	 ADVERTISEMENT  [IMAGE]     ADVERTISEMENT  [IMAGE]     Practice Centers Corporate Law  Employment Law  IP Law  Litigation  Tech Law   States New York  California  Pennsylvania  New Jersey  Other States   Automated Lawyer Spotlight  Tech News  Reviews & Tips  Product Info   Martindale-Hubbell Lawyer Locator  Complete information on legal professionals  Applications RealLegal  E-Brief  E-Transcript  Binder  MA3000  Practice Manager  Press Releases     ADVERTISEMENT  Need a court reporter?  Click here .     Want to see your message on this Newswire? Click here.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 11:14 AM -----

	Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/08/2000 12:41 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft of organization announcement

Steve:

I am discussing this draft below with Jeff Skilling. The present draft was
not agreed with me. I will get back wih you after my discussion with him.

Sanjay Bhatnagar, currently CEO of Enron India, has joined EBS as CEO for the
Middle East and Asia region. Sanjay will be responsible for building our
broadband business in this region and the current EBS team in the region will
report to Sanjay.  In this role, Sanjay will report to the EBS office of the
Chairman.  In addition, Sanjay will continue to remain responsible for Enron,
s wholesale energy business in India and will work at transitioning this
business into Enron Global Assets by March 31st, 2100 and integrating the
India Communication business into EBS.

Sanjay


We can come in on Thursday evening (so we can spend friday in the wine country) and leave sunday afternoon at 3:20 for 20000 miles!  So we are definitely in!  What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mainzer, Elliot
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:25 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston); Vann, Suzanne
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

I understand the need to find cheap flights. this whole enron meltdown has forced us all to take a closer look at our personal balance sheets. i imagine it might be pretty hard to take monday off, but one option would be to catch a morning flight home on monday. i'd be very inclined to do so, but it may be hard for you guys. maybe you have some work to do in California?? i will probably stay through sunday night. check with southwest airlines-- they may have a cheaper fare to oakland, and i can definitely get you to that airport. any thoughts on who else from houston might want to come down?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Mainzer, Elliot
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

el, I think you sent this to the wrong place.  just talked to suzanne and she is in - as long as we can get there cheap.  As for Sunday, when do you think people will leave.  Being 2 hours later here in houston, we might have to leave pretty early.  what are your thoughts?

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mainzer, Elliot
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:15 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

James -- real quick -- how many PVMWhs are there in a 4-year 7X24 6.5 MW power sale starting 1/1/02?
Thx

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	Mainzer, Elliot
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

I certainly understand your concerns and believe that they should be voiced.  I will also babysit the situation and try to make sure she abides by the rules!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mainzer, Elliot
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:30 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

We should definitely invite Rosie, but she has to promise to stay out of my parents' bedroom!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Mainzer, Elliot
Subject:	RE: Chez Stinson

El,
I am in for sure.  Just gotta look into possibly using miles.  I think Suz might be in as well.  What about Rosie?  Let me now the details!
Thanks for the invite -

K.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mainzer, Elliot
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Vann, Suzanne; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Chez Stinson

My folks have offered to let us use Chez Stinson for the weekend od Dec 15-16. Do you think you guys can motivate a Houston group to the Bay Area for a few days?

Elliot Mainzer
Renewable Power Desk
Enron North America
121 SW Salmon St.
3WTC-0306
Portland, OR  97201
(503) 464-3706
(503) 464-3740 (FX)
(503) 709-6959 (CL)


This CP has merged into PANCANADIAN ENERGY SERVICES INC.

If you do not wish to receive these notices, please let me know.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jason Sokolov                           04/30/2001 05:02 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivative Project Tracy Pan Part 1

---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:01
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Pan <pcp@pop.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 11:08:29 AM
Please respond to pcp@rice.edu
To: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivative Project Tracy Pan Part 1

Jason,

I have to break down the file since it exceeds the maximum file size for the
Rice Server.

I'll tell you how many parts you're supposed to receive in my last e-mail.

Thanks for coordinating for the class.

Have a nice day!

Tracy Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Sokolov@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:16 AM
To: pcp@rice.edu
Subject: Re: About the Energy Derivative Project

Tracy,
Break it down into 8000 files of 1 kB, and send each one in a separate
mail.

Just kidding!
Try to send the whole thing.
If one of the servers refuses to accept it, then break it down into several
pieces.
I know for sure that I can take files as large as 2MB.

Jason

 - 665 Team Project--Tracy Pan Part 1.xls


Start Date: 12/12/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:33 PM ---------------------------

Kristin Walsh
01/25/2001 11:23 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Jaime Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: California Update 1/25/01

California Timeline:
February 2nd:
The state legislature has to pass the enabling laws to let the state pay for
the electricity from auction before the current emergency money runs out on
February 2.   Republican leaders have vowed to block any additional emergency
funds.
The California courts gave Edison a two-week grace period (until February 2)
on demands by the California Power Exchange that Edison forfeit $215 million
in long-term low cost power contracts to the CPX for repayment of its debt.
Governor Davis told the Court that he may absorb that contract in favor of
taxpayers using his emergency "taking" powers.
February 7th:
President Bush, who had to intervene personally against his energy secretary
to extend the Energy Department order mandating electricity sales to
California by power generators, made it abundantly clear to all sides that
the two week deadline was hard and would not be extended.
February 13th:
Edison worked out a three-week grace period -- through February 13 -- with
all of its 32 banks and QFS to prevent from asking for accelerated repayment
during that period, but if the state has not figured out a way to bridge that
debt by then, this deadline could be a real trigger for bankruptcy.

Legislation
As mentioned in Tuesday's update, legislators are close to a long-term power
buying deal with the so-called "green" producers (wind, solar, hydro, cows)
of energy, accounting for 30% of California's total energy production.   This
would allow the Department of Water Resources to buy power from them at 8
cents per kilowatt hour.

Bill AB1X--the key piece of legislation for setting long-term power
contracts--is still being mulled over in the Senate, but is expected to pass
this week.  The keys issues is still the price, which will probably be
revised in accordance to the results of the auction.  Other legislation has
been introduced, including three bills by Boxer that would increase federal
support and impose "windfall profits tax" for wholesalers that sell power at
"unfair and unreasonable" rates.  The hydro legislation is still being
bantered about, however with going opposition from both Democrats and
Republicans.

Bail out scenarios
A new scenario is a market-oriented solution that would give the state of
California "warrants" on the PG&E and Edison stock in return for lending them
the money to get out of this current mess (still the problem of financing the
$6B vs. $12B).   As the stock prices recovered, the state could cash in the
warrants and rebate to electricity users some of the emergency surcharge
needed to pay back the debt.  This is exactly the plan used to bail out
Chrysler in the late 1970s and it worked wonders for taxpayers then.  This
senario would also provide Davis with some political cover, as the idea of
rebates are far more appealing than price increases.  Lots of details remain
to be worked out, but even the consumer activist groups threatening to create
propositions on fall ballots appeared to like this deal.

Bankruptcy
Socal is close to an agreement with 32 bank creditors and QFs to allow a
forbearance on debt payments through February 13th.  However, it is not
expected that the bondholders would agree to this type of deal.  The
bondholders could try to force the utilities into involuntary bankruptcy, but
would probably be unsuccessful.  As long as Socal continues working with
their creditors and show "good faith" any bankruptcy at this time would have
to be voluntary.  As this date (Feb. 13th) fast approaches, the state will
have to take quick action and draft and approve legislation between the
governor, the generators and the utilities to prevent Socal and PG&E from
bankruptcy.    As part of the forbearance agreement, Edison has contracted
with around 400 QFs and negotiations have been directed toward separating the
rate schedules of generation facilities fuelled between renewables and gas
fired generation.  Socal is attempting to shift gas fired QFs to longer term
schedules in light of the recent higher gas prices.

Auction
After a nervous night when only one bid had come to the state's Internet site
by midnight on Tuesday, California officials were happy to announce that they
had almost 40 bids at an average of 6.9 cents per kilowatt-hour, below the
7.4 cent real cap state officials had set internally as the threshold between
doable and impossible.  This was well above the 5.5 cent ceiling the governor
had publicly stated as the preferred level.  Davis will now turn the
negotiating process over to David Freeman, who heads the Los Angeles electric
agency and is generally considered the dean of public-private utilities in
the west.   One thing to note, the State of California has no intention of
any credit guarantees for the bids with the Department of Water Resources.
Several California legislators have made it very clear that they do not want
the state to be ultimately responsible for these power purchases.


Attached is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for Belden.
Are you going to present this to the customer or should I mail the draft?
If you want me to mail a copy, please give me the name of a contact.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I've updated the Financial Power Terminated file and run the deal splitter!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Melissa
Sent:	Wednesday, January  23, 2002 4:11 PM
To:	Evans, Casey; White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Allen, Thresa A.; Theriot, Kim S.; Reeves, Leslie
Subject:	Financial Power Terminations

There is one additional counterparty on the attached spreadsheet.

 << File: Financial Power Terminated.xls >>

Melissa
3-1886


Steve:

It looks like a great program!  I am happy to participate.  I would like to
have a teleconference of the panel within a few weeks so that I can make sure
I have time to get my materials together.

Regards,

Mark

	SKramer@milbank.com
	09/20/2000 04:14 PM

		 To: mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Energy Bar Association Program

Mark,

Per my telephone conversation with Margaret Gerhardt, I want to thank you
very much for your interest in participating on the e-commerce panel for the
Energy Bar Association mid-year program.? Margaret suggested that you be
listed on the program brochure as "invited," in case a conflict should arise.
The Association will be distributing a final brochure at a later date which
will reflect any changes in speakers.? Attached for your information is a
draft program brochure and a brief overview of the? e-commerce panel.? The
Association believes that the e-commerce panel is timely given the dramatic
impact that electronic commerce is having on the economy generally, and in
particular due to the unprecedented changes taking place in the energy
industries.? Having the perspective of EnronOnline, the industry leader, will
be a great addition to the program.

Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information.? I
look forward to seeing you at the program.

Steve

Steven M. Kramer
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
International Square Building
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
TEL:? 202-835-7508
FAX:? 202-835-7586
skramer@milbank.com

 <<EBA-MidYear2000-Agenda-Draft-9-12-00.doc>>  <<EBA Mid-Year Meeting.doc>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - EBA-MidYear2000-Agenda-Draft-9-12-00.doc
 - EBA Mid-Year Meeting.doc


Darn.


Please disregard the list on the first e-mail and use this one instead. Also, please note that for dial-in purposes, the phone number in the conference room is 713-584-1091

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcquade, Jennifer
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 3:48 PM
To:	Abramo, Caroline; Belden, Tim; Benson, Robert; Calger, Christopher F.; Choi, Paul; Clark, Chad; Cowan, Mike; Curry, Mike; Davis, Mark Dana; Dorland, Chris; Furrow, Dale; Gilbert, George N.; Lagrasta, Fred; Llodra, John; Mcdonald, Michael; Otto, Charles H.; Presto, Kevin M.; Rorschach, Reagan; Rosman, Stewart; SMITH, Douglas; Thomas, Paul; Tycholiz, Barry; Valderrama, Larry; Vickers, Frank; Whalley, Greg; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Forster, David; Diamond, Daniel; Mandola, Teresa
Subject:	UBSWenergy Launch Meeting

Please plan on attending a meeting Monday, February 4 at 10:30 AM in ECS 05075in to pick up your launch packets and discuss the procedure and timeline for contacting customers. Those of you outside of Houston should receive an overnight package Monday. The meeting will be very brief. If you have further questions or are unable to dial-in, you can contact me directly at 5-3614 or Teresa Mandola at 3-9807.

Also, please find attached the marketing contact list. You can filter by your name in the PA column to view the counterparties which you are responsible for contacting regarding the Password Application.


Richard, I have obtained a copy of the complaints in all of the NSM
litigation around the country.? Attached is an updated chart identifying all
of the plaintiffs.? I will review the complaints and the applicable statutes
of limitation.

On a related matter, this morning Judge Berle granted defendants leave to
file cross complaints against Schultes and the individual fund managers for
Oaktree and Farallon.? Plaintiffs' counsel argued that the complaints did not
state a cause of action against the fund managers and were duplicative of the
affirmative defenses already stated.? Judge Berle invited Plaintiffs to
pursue any such challenge by demurrer (motion to dismiss).

 <<3_BQD01!.DOC>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - 3_BQD01!.DOC


Sharon,

There are some hanky things going on in these confirms I don't like.  I've
just spoken to Russell and I'm going to talk to a swap attorney and then get
back to you.

	Sharon Crawford
	03/23/2001 03:48 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Hey, Tana.  I just faxed you the new credit worksheet - it's totally
different.

From: Tana Jones on 03/23/2001 03:29 PM CST
To: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Sharon,

Per the email below, I looked in the financial trading agreement database and
saw that Stephanie Panus, a paralegal in our group prepared an Annex B for
this counterparty in January of this year.  I would just confirm that the
credit is the same and then use the same Annex B as before.  I am going to
fax the credit worksheet that Credit send Stephanie in January so you can
check the credit.  Below is the Annex B Stephanie prepared.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 03:26 PM -----

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/23/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Sharon,
As Canada is now executing these confirms, please get with Tana, or someone
in her group, for an explanation of your questions.  Your questions all apply
to standard procedures that the Legal group in Houston handles.  I did,
though, make a mistake on Cash Collateral, you are correct there is no cash
collateral in Canada. Please disregard that 'X' for both counterparty's.  In
regards to the complete name of Slater Steel, as I explain in the comments of
the worksheet, a previous transaction was executed with a credit annex
attached to the confirm.  Once again, Tana or someone in legal, can explain
to you the database they have that would give you all this information.

Thanks,
Russell

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Crawford, Sharon
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Slater Steel

Russell, sorry, I should have reviewed the entire credit sheet before
e-mailing you earlier, but I have a few more questions:

1. What is the complete name of Slater Steel?
2. Who is their guarantor?
3. What does "NW" before the C$188MM under "Guarantor") mean?
4. Cash Collateral??
5. What are the 3rd Party debt threshold amounts (Events of Default) for each
of Slater's Guarantor and Enron Corp.?
6. Is Enron Corp.'s MAC debt rating BBB-?
7. Why is the Counterparty "X'd" under the MAC if there is a guarantor?

I think that are all of the questions I have for now.  Please advise.

Please note, however, that I will be away from the office next week.  Please
forward your comments to Linda Sietzema if you don't get them to me by today.

Thanks,
Sharon


Karen:

This is the last day of grade school for my son and I will be taking off early to attend a school graduation party with him and will not be available to interview.

	Thanks,  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Aucoin, Berney; Black, Don; Davis, Mark Dana; Gaskill, Chris; Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Grigsby, Mike; Herndon, Rogers; Thomas, Martin; McMichael Jr., Ed; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher; Superty, Robert; White, Stacey; Will, Lloyd
Cc:	Lavorato, John; Hillis, Kimberly; Dozier, Melissa; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Trading Track - Interviews: Wednesday May 30th

All,

We will be scheduling interviews for the Trading Track, Wednesday, May 30th from 1.00 pm to approximately 4.00 pm with a debrief afterwards.    We will be interviewing approximately 12 - 16 candidates (both internal and external).

Please reserve this time in your calander.    If you are unable to particpate please let me know otherwise you will be contacted with regards to location/confirmed times/resumes/etc shortly.

Any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Yes.

	From:  Cathy Phillips                           12/07/2000 10:29 AM

To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Holiday Luncheon

Mike McConnell would like to invite you to be his guest at holiday luncheon
on Thursday, December 14th, at 11:30 a.m., at Nino's Italian Restaurant
located at 2817 W. Dallas Street.

Please RSVP by return e-mail by no later than the end of the day on Monday,
December 11th.

Thank you.


For your review for tomorrow's meeting are the minutes of the September 6
meeting of the Executive Committee and Resnicow Schroeder's proposal.

See you tomorrow at noon at the Bayou Club.

 - 01
 - Proposal Synopsis RSA


Energy Costs Rocket, Handling Consumers Biggest Shock Yet
San Diego Union-Tribune, 12/12/00

Colombia's Medellin Utility Appeals Isagen Ruling, Paper Says
Bloomberg, 12/12/00

Energy costs rocket, handing consumers biggest shock yet

By Craig D. Rose
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
December 12, 2000
Power prices in California keep hitting new heights, with prices in the
state's main electricity market rising today to nearly $900 per megawatt
hour.
The rise continues a stunning ascent from a price of about $50 per megawatt
hour as recently as last spring. In retail terms, today's prices -- if
sustained for a month -- would result in an average residential power bill of
more than $450.
San Diego ratepayers are temporarily shielded from such high bills by a
rate-deferral plan in effect at least until 2002.

The latest prices represent a more than tripling in posted prices on the
California Power Exchange since Friday, when the operator of the state power
grid removed a state-mandated price cap of $250.
The latest escalation -- which comes despite improvements yesterday in state
power supplies -- is deepening the sense of crisis among state officials,
consumer advocates and utility companies.
Nonetheless, a spokesman for Gov. Gray Davis, who met yesterday with top
energy advisers in Los Angeles, said it was unlikely there would be action to
address the crisis at the state level until after federal regulators release
their plan for California.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is scheduled to issue a final order
regarding California's market at its meeting tomorrow. But yesterday the
commission made plans for a second meeting Friday to deal with the state's
problems, and did not clarify at which session it would issue the California
order.
Davis and others in the state have been critical of FERC's refusal to halt
what they describe as a devastating rise in power prices here or to order
refunds for payments made by consumers over the past summer.
The governor also has been severely critical of the California Independent
System Operator's decision to lift the state price cap last week. The ISO
manages most of the state's power supply.
Privately, most at the state level remain skeptical that federal action will
ease the crisis, saying it will be up to California to fix the problem. Last
Friday, FERC quickly approved the ISO's plan to end the price cap.
Increasingly, state officials and consumer activists are talking about
state-owned power systems, utility takeovers and a likely initiative seeking
to overturn deregulation. SDG&E and others also emphasize the need for a
price cap for the Western region of the United States, in order to prevent
suppliers from migrating to the highest prices and driving prices upward
everywhere.
The new highs in electricity prices came even as the ISO said the state's
supplies had improved, with the start-up of production from a formerly closed
nuclear power plant unit.
The apparent contradiction between the increase in available power and the
continued price escalation was blamed on a number of factors:
High prices for natural gas -- which fuels power plants -- continued to drive
up the cost of generating electricity. Cold conditions in the Midwest helped
push natural gas prices to record highs yesterday.
Allegations also persist that energy companies have manipulated the market.
Consumers Union and other advocacy groups say deregulating electricity prices
has proven to be a costly error for California consumers.
At the same time, the controversial removal of price caps in California is
allowing prices to rise to levels approaching those in other Western states.
"We've now had three days of the Hebert experiment," said state Sen. Steve
Peace, D-El Cajon. Peace was referring to Curt Hebert, a FERC commissioner
who opposes price caps for wholesale electricity.
Peace, who played a prime role in California's deregulation legislation,
likened the run-up in electricity prices to the oil embargo of the 1970s and
warned that it could devastate the economy.
"Someone from (former Gov. Pete) Wilson's administration told me, 'Somebody
in the energy business decided it's time for a depression,'?" said Peace, who
has also been critical of FERC's failure to rein in prices. "This is not
about electricity. It's about the economy."
In a letter to FERC yesterday, Peace repeated earlier calls for a federal
order returning the state to regulated power prices based on the cost of
production.
Market watchers said little could help the state over the next few days,
except Mother Nature.
"The prices will remain at these levels, unless you get a warming trend,"
said Alex Galatic of Strategic Energy, a Pittsburgh-based energy company with
offices in Carlsbad.
Market speculators appear to be betting against a break in price any time
soon. For example, electricity is selling for $800 per megawatt hour in the
Pacific Northwest for delivery in January, Galatic said.
"I see no break in the pricing," agreed Arthur O'Donnell, editor of
California Energy Markets,? a publication based in San Francisco.
A spokesman for Enron Corp., the largest electricity trader in the United
States, said the raising of prices in California had improved supplies
available to the state. And he added that there was another positive aspect
to the higher commodity prices.
"You are starting to see some demand response," said Mark Palmer, the Enron
spokesman, referring to cutbacks in power use as prices soar. "Some companies
are shutting down because it makes more sense to sell their gas (rather than
using it as fuel to continue their manufacturing operations)."
That's not an option for the state's utility companies, which continue to
report growing losses from buying electricity at higher costs than they can
collect from their customers. They have covered the shortfall by borrowing
money.
Dow Jones Newswires reported that Pacific Gas & Electric was only "weeks"
away from being unable to cover its power costs if prices continue at recent
levels.
A spokesman for the Bay Area utility's parent company declined to comment
directly on the report.
"It's up to the decision of creditors to make that call," said Greg Pruett,
vice president of communications for PG&E. "We have already borrowed $2.6
billion to cover undercollections that have totaled $4.6 billion.
"It can't continue forever."

Colombia's Medellin Utility Appeals Isagen Ruling, Paper Says
12/12/0 9:14 (New York)

     Bogota, Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Colombia's largest municipal
utility, Empresas Publicas de Medellin, said it will appeal a high
court decision barring it from buying a majority stake in state-
run generator Isagen, the daily El Espectador reported.
     EPM general manager Ramiro Valencia said government plans to
sell its 76 percent stake in Isagen could not go ahead until the
appeal and other lawsuits filed by EPM are resolved, the report
said. Colombia in September suspended the Isagen sale, which it
hoped would raise $340 million, pending a Council of State ruling
on an EPM suit filed alleging bias in the sales process.
     The Council of State, which oversees state agencies, ruled
Friday that the energy regulator was in its rights when it ruled
earlier this year against any single company taking a majority
stake in Isagen to avoid market dominance.
     EPM is planning to purchase the government's 76 percent stake
in Isagen together with Enron Corp. of the U.S. to avoid the anti-
monopoly regulations.

(12/12 ; P. 1B; to see El Espectador's Web site,
type {ESDR <GO>}


Attached is a sample "format" for summarizing swap group activity.  Please
add your own activities and feel free to edit the sample.  Suggestions are
welcome.  I'll edit responses in time  for our meeting next week.  Thanks.
Sara


I am pleased to announce that iBuyit Payables has been activated for all organizations supported by Houston Accounts Payable.  iBuyit Payables is an innovative tool that will enable us to code and approve invoices for goods and services online.

Who is impacted?
Beginning today, all coders and approvers of invoices that were previously submitted to Houston Accounts Payable for processing and payment, will code and approve invoices through iBuyit Payables.  Invoices entered directly into SAP, will not be impacted by this process.

Note:  Beginning May 8th, any invoices with coding sheets received by Accounts Payable will be entered into iBuyit Payables and electronically routed back to the coder. The invoice will then need to be coded and approved (again) in iBuyit Payables to generate a payment.

How do I receive training?
Online system demonstrations and quick reference cards are available on the Enron intranet in the Integrated Solutions Center Document Library at <http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265>.
Note:  You must use the Enron standard Microsoft Internet Explorer to view these materials.

Who do I call for help?
*  For help using the iBuyit Payables system, contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
*  For invoice payment status, contact the Accounts Payable Call Center at (713) 853-7127
 or toll free at (866) AP ENRON, or send an e-mail to iBuyit.payables@enron.com <mailto:iBuyit.payables@enron.com>.

Questions?
For general information about iBuyit, send an e-mail to <mailto:ibuyit@enron.com>.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2000
01:35 PM ---------------------------

service@strong-funds.com on 01/31/2000 12:57:57 AM
Please respond to service@strong-funds.com
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thank You For Your Recent Interest In Strong Funds

Dear Investor:

Thank you for your recent interest in Strong Investments. If you have
already sent in your application, you should receive a confirmation of
your investment shortly.

If you have further questions about our products and services, please
visit our web site, eStrong.com at http://www.estrong.com or send us an
e-mail at the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/Services98/contact/email.htm

If you prefer, you can contact a Strong Representative 24 hours a day,
7 days a week  at 1-800-359-3379.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

Best Performing Funds:
Many of our funds have received the industry's top rankings. To view
these funds and those that have outperformed the S&P 500 Index, click
on the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/Our_Funds/45star.htm

StrongOne Brokerage Account:
StrongOne allows to you consolidate all of your holdings into one
convenient portfolio. To learn more about the products and services
that make StrongOne the best choice for your stock, bond, and fund
investments, click on the following link:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/strongone/aboutindex
.htm

Interactive Tools & Calculators:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/Interactive98/index.
htm

Strong Funds Prospectuses & On-line Application:
http://www.estrong.com/strong/perl/email.pl?11410,/strong/orderform.htm

Once again, we appreciate your consideration of Strong Investments, and
we look forward to helping you pursue your financial goals.

Sincerely,

Byron C. Vielehr
Strong Investments
www.eStrong.com

Strong Investments, Inc.
11624E99

***************************
If you prefer not to receive e-mail updates from Strong Funds in the
future, please follow this link:
http://www.strong-funds.com/strong/Services98/contact/unsub_change.htm?sshackl
@enron.com


Hey, time to join the fun at FERC!!!

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 09:42 AM -----

	Rebecca W Cantrell/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/26/2001 08:08 AM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Transwestern Hearing

Here,s a little more detail on the issues that FERC wants to explore with
regard to the Transwestern negotiated deals:

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : July 26, 2001
FERC Targets Transwestern for Market-Power Hearing
FERC called for a hearing to determine whether Transwestern Pipeline
exercised market power when it awarded negotiated-rate contracts that led to
shippers being charged up to $27/MMBtu last February, when the firm
transportation rate to the California border was only 38 cents/MMBtu.
That was "70 times the recourse rate," said Commissioner Linda Breathitt, who
called the matter up for discussion at the Commission's regular meeting.
"Thirty-eight cents versus $27, that's a big difference in prices and we
ought to be looking at that," responded Commissioner William Massey.
"...[W]e believe closer scrutiny of transactions that provide the opportunity
to impose rates many multiples in excess of maximum approved tariff rates is
necessary, especially in light of our serious concern regarding the high
prices for natural gas in California relative to prices in the rest of the
country and their consequential effect on wholesale electricity prices in
California," the order noted [RP97-288-009].
FERC's action was in response to a show cause order it issued in March,
directing Transwestern to explain how it had firm capacity available on its
pipeline to move gas under the negotiated-rate transactions, and why its
actions in entering into the negotiated-rate agreements didn't violate
Commission regulations and policy regarding firm transportation service and
negotiated-rate agreements.
FERC's order requires Transwestern to make certain changes to the posting of
daily capacity. "I'm satisfied that this should take care of the issue
prospectively," Breathitt said. But with respect to the negotiated
agreements, "our order today establishes a hearing of limited scope on a
fast-track basis to determine whether Transwestern exercised market power in
awarding these...contracts."
It directs an administrative law judge to convene a pre-hearing conference
within 10 days, and issue an initial decision on the matter within 60 days.
The hearing will focus on three issues: 1) whether Transwestern capacity was
advertised and awarded in a fair manner; 2) whether the rates negotiated were
the result of the exercise of market power; and 3) why the capacity awarded
was available without interruption while recourse service was not available.
"In addition, I have a question [as to] why shippers agreed to such rates
when much lower recourse rates should have been available under our
negotiated rate program," Breathitt said.
The shippers that entered into the negotiated-rate transactions with
Transwestern include Richardson Products Co., Sempra Energy Trading Corp., BP
Energy Co., Astra Power LLC and Reliant Energy Services.


whazupppppp!!!!!!!!!!


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2001 05:40 AM -----

	showard@agsk.com
	06/01/2001 08:53 PM

		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc: wcp@quinnemanuel.com
		 Subject: Settlement

Natwest, McDonald, and PaineWebber have collectively offered the
Farallon/Oaktree plaintiffs (and maybe Legg Mason, I am not sure) $13 million
to settle.  It is clear that this group hopes to persuade SDI and Enron to
contribute something to such a settlement, but they told Hennegan that they
would fund the full $13 million themselves if necessary.  Hennegan is asking
for something in the "high $20s"  I am advised that the settlement group is
prepared to go to the high teens, but it is not clear how much further.

I do not know the allocation of the $13 million among Natwest and McDonald,
except that I believe that Natwest is NOT paying the lion's share, as one
might expect.

If the bargaining proceeds, I am sure that someone will ask Enron to
contribute.

       ................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


We don't have to meet with them....
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 02:55
PM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/13/2000 02:49 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Bruce Silvers

Ok, you are on to meet with Bruce and Nick at 4:30-5pm, depending on traffic,
at their offices located at 399 Park Avenue.


I had Tasker forward me the readings...

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Forward Header_____________________
Subject:    Re: Readings
Author: tasker@haas.berkeley.edu (Sarah Tasker)
Date:       03/14/2001 7:50 PM

here they are

At 03:03 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Profesor Tasker,
>
>I've been looking everywhere for the readings for tomorrow night and,
>accordingly to my peers, it sounds like the supplemental reading packet was
>distributed several weeks during the one class I've missed.  Are you aware
>whether it is e-mailable so I could read it in advance of class tomorrow
night?
>
>Thanks
>
>**********************************************
>Mark D. Guinney, CFA
>Consultant
>Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
>345 California Street, Ste. 1400
>San Francisco, CA  94104
>(415) 733-4487 ph.
>(415) 733-4190 fax
>
>

---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
---------------------------
From: tasker@haas.berkeley.edu (Sarah Tasker) at Internet
Date: 3/14/01 7:50PM -0500
To: Mark Guinney at ~WW_SFO
Subject: Re: Readings
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 - america online.pdf
 - harnischfeger.pdf


Hi Louise - any update re: Colorado weekend discussions?  I will be out of the office tomorrow and Monday (bank holiday) so was hoping to touch base before then if you have a chance.  You can reach me on mobile anytime though:  +44 7748 932 298.

Many thanks,
Paul


Hello,  Latausha McDowell is a contact at Dynegy that you can use. Her phone
number is (713) 767-8841 and fax is (713) 767-8695.

Thanks!
Melissa
3-1886

From: Tana Jones on 11/30/2000 01:36 PM
To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dynegy Power Marketing

I've got some changes to make to that assignment and then I'm ready to send
it to them.  Do you have a contact for me to send it to?

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	11/30/2000 11:06 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dynegy Power Marketing

Hi Tana, I noticed that the trades that we need to assign from Dynegy Power
Marketing to Dynegy Marketing and Trade were all November trades.  The
settlements group will be doing their download tonight for November
business.  Do you think I can change these trades to the correct name today
or should I wait until the assignment is fully signed.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


We are continuing work to ensure our new online trading system, UBSWenergy, is ready for launch on the week of Feb. 11, which is the week following the anticipated Enron/UBS Closing Date of Friday, Feb. 8.

To assist in this process, we are planning an online trading simulation for Thursday, February 7 from  0900 to 1100 (CST). It is planned to include all  traders, originators, mid/back-office staff and IT teams who would normally be involved with electronic trading.

Purpose of the simulation - The simulation will test our "live" trading environment (restricted to internal access only) and will:

Test the integrity and functionality of the system and related processes (including credit, risk, legal, operations, etc.)
Provide an opportunity for traders to verify their products and product setup
Demonstrate how the trading system and processes work to UBS staff visiting next week

Nature of the simulation - The simulation will include testing of all processes related to trading and mid/back-office functions:

Credit, Legal, Risk, Operations, and other groups:
Profile tests for "external" customers (role-played by Originators)
Profile tests for internal users (traders, back-office, etc.)
Data and Process checking as completed transactions flow through Mid/back-Office systems

Traders and Originators:
Traders will be managing their individual books and associated products. Although we may be restricted to certain financial products on launch day, both physical and financial will be available during the simulation. Each trader will be asked to manage their individual position and profitability goals for the simulation.
Originators and others will be asked to play the roles of counterparties. Credit limits, etc. will be tested during the simulation.

Information Technology:
Will assist in preparing data on the system for the simulation.
After the simulation is over, will work with the relevant groups to test the trade-data in various systems and risk books
Will ensure all simulation data is removed from the system after the simulation is complete.

Next steps

Traders and Originators will be contacted prior to simulation day to ensure they have appropriate access to the system.
Originators will be assigned specific roles. You should expect to receive an email and/or handout on or before Wednesday, Feb. 6.
UBSWenergy personnel will be meeting with back office personnel over the next several days to ensure everything is in place for the simulation.

Summary

This simulation is an important step towards re-launching our trading business. We appreciate the participation of everyone involved as we prepare for the public launch of UBS Warburg Energy and the UBSWenergy trading platform.

If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or ideas regarding this simulation, please feel free to contact Bob Shults (30397) or myself (31861).

Regards,
Dave Forster
713.853.1861
E-Mail:	David.Forster@enron.com


I got no negative comments, so lets move forward.  I know things are busy, but lets progress at the best pace we can.  Thanks.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whippo, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:41 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Graves, Jerry; Vaughan, Pat; Pribble, Dan; Bailey, Arnie; David Roensch (E-mail); Smith, Rick
Cc:	Hendricks, Jonny; Hill, Scott; Lawrence, Ed; Ingalls, Todd
Subject:	RE: Set points

This looks good to me.  If you don't have any issues with this we will proceed.  Comments?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ingalls, Todd
Sent:	Saturday, March 16, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Whippo, Jeff
Cc:	Hendricks, Jonny; Hill, Scott; Lawrence, Ed
Subject:	RE: Set points

Yes, I forgot to get back with you on this.  Jon Hendricks, Scott Hill and myself got together last week and thought this might be a good approach.

The control system does pretty good with control of the units until they get down to minimum speed and that is where we get into problems.  If we get over 1010 psi on the mainline or 2psi over maop on any system we will look at the governor speed and if it is not at minimum we will speed up the process trying to get back to maop.

If we are over 2psi (.2%) and at minimum speed for 2 minutes we will take one unit off line and wait for 5 minutes to see if we need to repeat this and take off another unit.  At anytime if we hit 1015 or 7psi (.7%)over maop we will keep the station shutdown and all units will go down.
1015 is where we will have the pressure switches will be set.  I feel that we should be comfortable with these numbers as we will not ever get over 1% of maop unless we have a failure of the system and at this point the relief valves will protect us.  We will have to have several failures for this to occur.

If you feel that this is a good plan please let me know and we will come up with the programming to make it happen.
We can start implementing this right away and should be able to get it done by the end of the year.  We would  be quicker but we seem to have a lot going on right now.

Thanks
Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whippo, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, March 15, 2002 5:51 PM
To:	Hendricks, Jonny; Ingalls, Todd
Subject:	Set points

I got busy and I know you probably did too.  Are we making any headway on a strategy?

Thanks,
Jeff


A few updates, clarifications and suggestions:
To be clear, the Group of Ministers has not approved any specific draft.
They deliberated on various concepts, which approved concepts have been
incorporated into the NCAER Draft VII.
It is our understanding that, just prior to his hospitalization, the late
Minister instructed his Ministry to support the NCAER draft.
The Prime Minister has assumed the role of Minister of Power until a
successor to Mr. Kumaramangalam has been appointed.  I'm sure you are aware
of the dynamic role the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) has played in the
telecommunications reform in India.  The same kind of dynamic role should be
played by the PMO in power reforms.
Mr. N.K. Singh is the Secretary to the Minister and was the person who
actively worked on the telecommunication reforms.  If the Secretary of Energy
has an opportunity to indicate to Mr. Singh (and certainly the Prime Minister
if possible) the need for the Prime Minister's Office to become active in
promoting power reforms and the advisability and need to support Draft VII of
the Electricity Bill, it would be most helpful.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/11/2000 09:52 AM ---------------------------

Jane Wilson
09/10/2000 12:01 PM
To: David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov
cc: Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hillings@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Neil
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear David,

I'm so glad you asked for an update!

We have indeed had an interesting development regarding the Electricity Bill
since your visit.  You will recall that in AMCHAM's briefing, it was
positively noted that the drafting process of the Electricity Bill had been
transparent and that a draft that would provide a blueprint for the
restructuring of the electricity sector to move toward competitive markets
was attained.  Noone was 100 percent satisfied (probably the mark of a good,
passable bill) but many  agreed to the draft and felt, while not perfect, it
would achieve the desired reform.

We have learned that there are actually two drafts of the Electricity Bill
sponsored by the Ministry of Power.  The first has been developed by NCAER
(NCAER draft) in a very transparent process with seven iterations and
comments from 190 parties.  NCAER was hired as a consultant for this purpose
by the Ministry of Power.  At the time of Draft III, a second draft (MoP
draft) was developed in the Ministry which subsequently incorporated some but
not all of the NCAER draft provisions negotiated in the transparent process.
It was the MoP draft that was sent to the Group of Ministers and has been
worked on by the Ministry of Law.

The draft, however, was never introduced in Parliament.  The industry
discovered the existence of the second MoP draft immediately prior to
Minister Kumaramangalam's hospitalization and lobbied him and Secretary Basu
heavily to introduce the NCAER draft in Parliament or, at a minimum, allow a
transparent commenting process on the MoP draft.

Several parties in the industry have now been given the MoP draft, and
Secretary Basu has said he would entertain comments.  (How widely it has been
distributed is unknown.)  In addition, the death of the Minister, who was a
staunch advocate of reform, and the lack of a named successor, has now left
things somewhat uncertain.

The issues as they now stand are:

The existence of two separate Ministry-sponsored drafts, only one of which
was subjected to a wide sector review process.
The need to use the product of a transparent, commenting process once it has
been formulated.
The fact that the fine-tuned balance of interests and clear blueprint for a
transition to competitive markets achieved by the NCAER draft has been lost
in the MoP draft.  For example, the clear deregulation of price provisions in
the tariff section have been removed so that there is, in the MoP draft, full
regulation of price by the state commissions; however, in the state
commission section, there is a provision that allows the State Commission to
permit access to a consumer class and only determine the wheeling charge
(rather than the wheeling and supply price) for that class when it has so
determined.   Thus, there is  an apparent conflict within the statute
regarding the regulation of commodity priceand uncertainty regarding access
to end users.  (There are many such examples.)

Action Item:  Either support the NCAER draft and send it to the Ministry of
Law for legal fine tuning (Basu mentioned that the "form" of the NCAER draft
was not right), or repeat the iterative, transparent commenting process with
regard to the MoP draft.  hWe recommend supporting the NCAER draft because it
reflects a balance of the multiple sector interests.  It is the first such
document produced through an open process in India and was a process
sponsored by the Ministry -- for that reason alone, the Ministry should
promote and support the NCAER version.

Any assistance you can render on this issue will be greatly appreciated by
many parties in the sector.  Let us know how it goes.

Sincerely,
Jane Wilson

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/09/2000 07:51 PM ---------------------------

"Pumphrey, David" <David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov> on 09/09/2000 03:36:09 AM
To: "'sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com'" <sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com>,
"'jane.wilson@enron.com'" <jane.wilson@enron.com>
cc: "Cutler, Thomas" <Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov>

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear Sanjay and Jane,

I wanted to again thank you for the briefings you provided during my recent
visit to India.  Your analysis of developments in the electricity sector were
very helpful.

As you know we are getting ready for the visit of the Prime Minister next
week.  We have several energy events related to the visit and hope to be able
to complete some of the "homework" that you assigned.  It would be
particularly helpful if you could provide any updates on the status of the
Electricity bill.  I understand that the Council of Ministers had approved it
but I don't know if progress has been made in the Parliament.  Also there was
a report that some aspects of the bill had been changed in the approval
process.  Any updates would be useful for us in preparing for our meetings
with Secretary Basu and the Prime Minister.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

David Pumphrey
Department of Energy


Folks,

I am a Vice President with Enron, and have been with the company some 6 years
now.  I was hired through Enron Associate pool, and started off by marketing
power on the East Coast with Jim Fallon.  Currently I am working in the India
Region, looking into different ways to develop merchant type activities in
India, anticipating the start of trading activities some time in the future.
One of my challenges is to make the team in India aware of the type of
sophisticated operations and processes that we have in place for trading
activities, as well as the range of products we have to offer.

I have been in conversation with Mike McConnell and Jeff Shankman on the
Global Products side, and are planning a session to acquaint the team in
India with activities in that group.  Similarly, on the power side, we have
been interacting with John Sherriff's team in London.

I feel that it will be very beneficial for some of the team members to get
acquainted with the processes on the power trading side in Houston, and to
get an idea of the RAC process, the Research side, the Back-offices, as well
as the trading operations here.  Similarly, the team there could present to
you the state of the market in India, and give you an idea of the type of
opportunities there.  I am therefore eliciting your support to put together a
session in Houston where they can be acquainted with these functions, as well
as the people responsible for them in the US.  There are three people in the
group who would benefit from this exposure.  One of them is from the
Associate pool, while the other two are people hired locally in India.

I have already spoken with our COO, Wade Cline in this regard, and seek your
support in putting together an agenda for such a session.  Please let me know
who I should contact within your groups to discuss this further.

Regards,
Sandeep.


A new or modified message is in the EOL Terminations mail file.

Click on the doc link below to view the message.

This service is supported by European Notes Administration
 Who Date Subject

 London Fax System 05/05/2000 New fax received (Likely sender: +44 171 235
1652).


Thanks, Mark.  We can definitely handle the definitive corporate docs.  We
already have a good base from other transactions.  I look forward to
receiving your draft docs.

Regards,
Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Taylor@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Taylor@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 8:31 PM
To: fgetman@houstonstreet.com
Cc: Travis.McCullough@enron.com; Louise.Kitchen@enron.com
Subject: RE: Follow-up on Friday's meeting

Frank -

There appears to have been a mild snafu with my e-mail address (my fault,
not yours) and I have just now seen your note from yesterday morning.  I am
working on the Posting Agreement.  I'm afraid Louise may have thought more
highly of my abilities to create something like that from whole cloth than
I deserved but we will try and get that to you soon.  Travis McCullough,
our corporate lawyer, will get together a term sheet on the equity side of
things which we should be able to get to you quickly (no later than
Thursday if his schedule permits).  I'm assuming that your legal team will
have to be draftsmen of the definitive corporate documents but the term
sheet should give them a good starting point (and let you confirm that the
lawyers on both sides are getting it right).

Sorry for the delay and confusion - we'll get these out to you as soon as
we can.

Mark


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Set forth below for your information and review are the expenditures with
Minority/Women Owned Business Enterprises through September 30, 2000.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at x69500.

Calvin Eakins
Director, Minority & Women Business Development
Enron Global Strategic Sourcing
calvin.eakins@enron.com
713/646-9500


Kim, thanks for your quick response and patience.  We're going to do
something.  My guess is next week.  I guessed $5.20 this morning in some
analysis I did so the magnitude of the change in price was not unexpected.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
To: Jeff Fuller (E-mail)
Sent: 10/4/01 8:40 AM
Subject: Merced

Jeff,

Got your message this morning and we have refreshed the blend and extent
price for you.  For 2040 MMbtu/day at the PG&E City Gate for January,
2002 through December 2005, the blend and extend price is $5.205.  Nymex
for the outer years has been moving up since last week, therefore, the
little increase in price.  Let me know if there is anything else you
need -

Thanks,

Kim

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Brenda, could you please investigate formation of a DealBench subsidiary
formed under Canadian (Ontario) law?  Initial issues include limited
liability status (form of entity), control (any necessity for Canadian
ownership or representation in management?), repatriation, tax, timing, and
cost of formation and maintenance.  At this point, we only are ascertaining
feasibility.  Depending upon whether this seems practical, we should at some
point involve appropriate ENA tax and accounting teams.  Let me know results
of initial investigation and we can determine next steps.  If we need outside
counsel input on Canadian issues, start with Bob Baird for direction.

Thanks, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 01/29/01 10:18 AM -----

	Ross Mesquita
	01/29/01 10:14 AM

		 To: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: DealBench Canada

You got it -- Ontario it is.

Nora Dobin
01/29/2001 10:08 AM
To: Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: DealBench Canada

Is subject province Ontario?

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

	Ross Mesquita
	01/29/01 09:55 AM

		 To: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: DealBench Canada

Yes -- the sub would have to set up to give the appearance that DealBench
deals conducted for Canada are conducted by a Canadian company.

Thanks,
Ross

Nora Dobin
01/29/2001 09:51 AM
To: Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: DealBench Canada

Would the sub be formed under Canadian law?  Seems it would need to be to
achieve goal.  Let me know and I'll investigate.

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com

	Ross Mesquita
	01/28/01 04:20 PM

		 To: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: DealBench Canada

Nora,

We may have an opportunity to do several auctions for the Ontario Electricity
Finance Corp through a contact I have at Enron Canada (Aleck Dadson).  Aleck
mentioned that we might have a better chance to close the deal if DealBench
could be presented as a Canadian product.

How difficult, costly and time intensive would it be to create a sub called
DealBench Canada (or DealBench Maple Leaf or whatever)?  Just wanted to get
your thoughts on whether this is even a possibility.

Regards,
Ross


Hello!  Just let me know what your fax # is then you can fwd it to Rick!

Lesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean, Clint" <Clint.Dean@ENRON.com>
To: "Lesley Maser (E-mail)" <llmaser@degeurinrealty.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:52 AM

Did you get that info over to Rick yet?  Just a friendly reminder if
not.

Thanks

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I'm sure that by now everyone's seen the letter that Angelides sent to Loretta last Friday.  If you haven't, let me know and I'll have it faxed to you.  In short, Angelides blames all of the financial woes of the State on Loretta and the PUC.  Specifically, he claims that by allowing DA sign-ups to extend to September 20th, the PUC may have shifted over $8 billion to "homeowners, small businesses, and other enterprises..."  Angelides ends the lettery by urging the Commission to immediately roll back the DA suspension date to July 1.

The concern, of course, is that Angelides' assertions are out there and have received alot of press attention, i.e., Direct Access=$8 billion tax on homeowners.

To her credit, Loretta refuted Angelides in the press accounts and repeated that the best way to get costs down is to renegotiate the DWR contracts.  She also said in the press accounts that she intends to deal with the July 1/September 20 suspension issue at the next commission meeting.

In light of these events (and the increasing attacks on Loretta by Angelides and others in the Administration) It might be useful to give Loretta an assist by drafting a very brief letter to her stating:

Angelides is all wet--DA and "fairness" are not mutually exclusive and the PUC has all the regulatory tools necessary to ensure fairness is maintained going forward.  Thus, the 8 plus billion dollar number is without basis.
Re-stating that the PUC has no legal authority to retroactively suspend DA to July 1, etc., etc.

Folks may have other points to make.  Seems that we'd want to keep the letter short and to the point, however.

A letter might be useful in order to 1) give Loretta some support and 2) get some counter-press in response to the Angelides tantrum.

Any thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


Jim

I've been reading a lot about your company recently in the press. Hang in
there sport and good luck. Just remember you're smarter and better then the
rest of them.

Les


I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect.  Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive.  Thank you
for your help.

507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/15/99
02:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           10/15/99 02:52 PM

To: Hhawks@tenaska.com
cc:
Subject: SERC/Enron/TVA

Mr. Hawks--As requested by Mr. Skilling, I am sending to you the examples
that Enron included in its October 6 letter to you (with several words added
to fully explain the 2000 MW example).  As explained in the discussion in the
October 6 letter, Enron would like to ensure that NERC's response
specifically addresses the types of transactions included in these examples
in order to avoid implementation problems and suggests including examples in
your decision.  Thank you.  Christi Nicolay 713-853-7007


Attached please find a revised Solutions Document.  Also attached is a
timeline I thought we should consider including.

It still needs the following:

1. Language on gas infrastructure (Jeff will develop)
2. Updated table on undercollection, etc. (Robert will work with MRW)
3. Data on core/non-core retail costs for June 2001 to incorporate in table
(Robert will request fromTamara)

***I will be out of the office tomorrow, but will have my computer (or try my
cell phone - 832.483.0624) and will be expecting to work on this to finish
it.  I will check in with you all tomorrow morning.****

Thanks,

Jennifer


Thanks for remembering me.  Hope everythnig is well with you too!

JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	Happy Birthday to You

Hi John,

I hope you are doing well, and have a good Birthday tomorrow!

C