Per David's request, I'm attaching a (very old) form from Houston, not often
used here anymore.  I'm not sending this directly to David (if only to avoid
"form shopping"). Let me know if I can be of further assistance.  Thanks.
Sara

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 01:31
PM ---------------------------

David S Reinfeld@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/09/99 07:22 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Tolling Agreements: For Brazil

Sara:

When I saw you here (Sao Paulo) last -at the meeting with the Origination
group, you mentioned you could provide assistance on the trading side. I am
working on a deal which involves a tolling arrangement  between a marketing
company and a power plant.  I would like to take a look at a similar
agreement in the US if we have one to use as a guide.

- the deal is called Puerto Suarez -a 150 MW Power Plant we are developing in
Bolivia.  The Plant will eventually be sold off to investors, but we will
keep the contract for gas and power.  I am working on the Capacity Purchase
Agreement which will be a tolling arrangement with the plant for capacity.
We have been working with Gabbie in Argentina for the GSA.  I am in SP if you
would like to discuss.  55-11-5503-1281  Thanks.

Regards,
David


Would you send me an amtel at 3:00pm Wed, Jan 26 about my review?

Thanks

	From:  Kimberly Brown                           01/20/2000 07:49 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Your review time

Your review will be Wednesday, Jan. 26 at 4:00, in EB 3084.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:45
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 09:18:43 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
09:25 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/28/99 09:05 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Marianne
Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - JANUARY 2000 NEEDS

Good Morning.  As per my conversation with Noel this morning, he will be
getting back to be whether CG&E will be served off ANR or TGT.  I have space
of
2000 dth at Springboro as per CG&E.

I have my PECO numbers listed below in purple.

ANR
 CG&E- deliveries to Springboro 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 30th - note this can be served off TGT

Tetco
 BUG  145 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
28th
 Con Ed 261 dth/day  (estimate ONLY) LDC Nom Deadline is 2
pm on the 30th
 PECO  1006 dth/day Monday - Friday and 452 dth/day
Saturday and Sunday LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 30th
 PECO-PAGas  250 dth/day Monday - Friday and 230 dth/day Saturday and
Sunday
 PSEG  1696 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 29th
 Etown  23 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
 NJN  7528 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est on
the 30th

CNG - PA gas for PECO /day  (If we have a problem flowing this much,
please let me know as soon as possible so we can buy delivered gas to PECO's
gate from one of the other suppliers)

Transco
 LILCO  382 dth/day    (capacity release is also for
382) LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 27th
 PSEG  189 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the
29th
 S Jersey  113 dth/day Transco nom must show Enduser # 012224 to
be confirmed- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the 30th
 Piedmont 1113 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline was 10:30 est on
the 22nd - just need activity number now
 PSNC  190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC)
   The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)

Texas Gas
 DP&L  1298 dth/day  LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 est on the 30th
 CG&E  1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 30th - note this can be served off TGT


Ricki - would you please:

1. Make reservations at 11:45 on Thurs for Judy Johnson & I at Duck & Co in Hyatt

2. Set up a pre-meeting for Don Hawkins & I before our meeting with Rod tomorrow

3. Move my Wed. staff meeting to run from 10-11:30 (instead of 9-10).  Since we no longer have a Wash office, I plan to watch the Commission meeting myself


California Senator Feinstein, Governor Davis,  Secretary of Energy
Richardson, and FERC Commissioner Hoecker held a joint press  conference
related to the California energy problem.? They indicated a  critical need
for supply TODAY to serve the California marketplace.?  Secretary Richardson
indicated he will exercise his emergency power under the  Federal Power Act
[section 202(c)] to direct generation to California.? The  Secretary
indicated that DOE, under the FPA, will set a fair price for the  power.
?
IEP requests all its members to  deliver?as much generation as possible to
California ASAP in order to avert  potential shortages.?
?
In addition, the Governor and Senator Feinstein  called for regionwide price
caps and mandatory, reasonable long-term contracts  between generators and
the utilities.? They made the point that 4,000 -  5,000 MWs are being
exported from the state, currently a lack of adequate  planning and
scheduling of resources/planned outages exists, and indicated that  the CPUC
would moved to implement forward contracting.?
?
IEP will forward the formal statement from the  Press Conference (or a
summary) as soon as available.


Thanks Susan.  MKM:  FYI.  DF

Susan Scott
01/16/2001 04:17 PM
To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Swap deals

Here is what I've been able to learn about the hedges of the TW index rate
deals.
Morgan has been working in connection with Dan Fancler, Tracy Geaccone (sp?)
and Dave Neubauer to make sure these can go under FAS 133 and for any other
analysis that needs to be done.  They will continue to do so on the other
deals and I'll follow up.  I am satisfied the interim procedures are being
followed.  Questions -- let me know.


I think I've turned on AOL.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:10 AM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:

Hey Paul...

If you're on the computer could you log into AOL.  I don't have a phone near me to call you on, we need to go over these curves.


Make sure we keep all visitors at a considerable distance from the trading floor.


Debbie has to be downtown for other reason on May 24th.  Could you meet with
her about 4:15pm at my office.  I will schedule a conference room for your
meeting with Debbie.  Perhaps yopu could come around 3:45pm and I could go
over any and all changes that I have on tem prior to your meeting with
Debbie.


Attached are initial drafts of documents for the referenced transaction.
Please let me know if you do not wish to receive drafts or if there is anyone
else that should receive drafts.

Please call me with your questions or comments.

Thanks.

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 06:13 PM -----

	"Rosser, Dianna" <drosser@velaw.com>
	12/12/2000 06:05 PM

		 To: "'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'" <teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>
		 cc: "Shouse, August" <AShouse@velaw.com>
		 Subject: Enron/Mahonia December 2000 forward sale documents

Teresa,

Attached please find clean and blacklined drafts of the main documents.
Augie and I have talked with Milbank and plan to send them drafts of these
documents tomorrow, but we wanted to give you a chance to review them first.
Please feel free to call or e-mail us with any questions or comments.

Warm regards,

Dianna J. Rosser
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Business and International Section
3300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
tel: (713) 758-3688
fax: (713) 615-5899
email: drosser@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - Houston_404983_1.DOC
 - Houston_408033_1.DOC
 - Houston_404950_1.DOC
 - Houston_404980_1.DOC
 - Houston_404914_1.DOC
 - Houston_404981_1.DOC
 - Houston_404917_2 (2).DOC
 - Houston_404942_1.DOC
 - Houston_404948_1.DOC
 - Houston_408015_1.DOC
 - Houston_408008_1.DOC
 - Houston_408002_1.DOC
 - Houston_407997_1.DOC
 - Houston_407993_1.DOC
 - Houston_407981_1.DOC
 - Houston_407974_1.DOC


Grant,

I shall be in the office for a few hours today (looks like food poisoning).
I shall try to call you from home.

I don't see any major problem. I shall call David Oxley and ask how we could
structure  the rehire so that you are not hosed this year.

Vince

"Grant Masson" <GrantMasson@houston.rr.com> on 12/13/2000 11:07:12 PM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Message from Grant

Vince:
?
Having now the benefit of some experience with El  Paso, I conclude that
Enron would offer more for me in the long term.? If  you have an interest in
discussing the matter further, please give me a call. I  would appreciate
your comments.?
?
Best Regards,
Grant.
?
(Mobile) 281 381 9983
(Home) 713 664 7260


I not sure I know who David Jallits is,


Mark/Steve -- Meredith has made great progress working w/ Kekst on updating
Enron descriptions in all the key databases -- the project is nearly done!  kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/23/2000
01:13 PM ---------------------------

mherley <michael-herley@KEKST.COM> on 05/22/2000 04:42:57 PM
To: "'kdenne@enron.com'" <kdenne@enron.com>, "'Meredith@enron.com'"
<Meredith@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Progress Report

As tomorrow is my last day in the office before the "Big Day" I wanted to
provide both of you with an update as to where we stand on the Online
Database Audit.

TAB C (Baseline) -- Baseline has updated its Business Overview of Enron
Corp. and the new version has been approved by Mark Palmer.

TAB E (CorpTech/OneSource) -- The listing questionnaire was faxed to
Meredith last week to be updated and faxed directly back to CorpTech.

TAB F (DJ Interactive) -- The data in the DJ report comes from Hoover's.  I
am currently working with Hoover's to update the Business Description in the
DJ report.

TAB G (D&B) -- An updated list of officers, directors, financials and the
expanded business description has been sent to the update desk at D&B.  It
will probably take at least 3 weeks for the D&B report to be updated.

TAB H (Extel Company Report) -- Extel is now reporting updated financials
for Enron Corp.  Extel is also in the process of updating the Activities and
Management section of the report.

TAB K (Hoover's) -- Hoover's is in the process of updating its list of
Officers for Enron Corp.

TAB M (Market Guide) -- Market Guide is in the process of changing the
Company's name to Enron Corp. and is updating its Business Summary and list
of Officers for the Company.  In addition, we could have Enron moved into
the Oil & Gas Operations Industry of the Energy Sector within Market Guide.
The peer group members of this new classification have been sent over to
Enron.  Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

TAB O (Multex) -- Multex is in the process of updating its Business Overview
of Enron, which should include changing the size of Enron's assets to $33
billion and possibly including the Company's ranking within the Fortune 500.
In addition, I am exploring if there is a more advantageous industry
classification for Enron.  Enron is currently classified in the Basic Energy
industry sector and its peer group is Major Pipeline Companies.  Dynegy's
peer group is Major Oil & Gas Gathering & Marketing Companies -- perhaps
this is a more appropriate classification for Enron.  Please let me know
that you think.

TAB R (Quicken)  -- Quicken obtains its data from Media General Financial
Services.  I have spoken with an analyst at Media General and he has updated
the Descriptor for Enron: "Delivers physical commodities and financial and
risk management services to customers; develops, constructs and operates
energy facilities worldwide; produces electricity and natural gas; and is
developing a network platform to facilitate on line business."  The new
descriptor should appear on Quicken.com within the next several days.  In
addition, I am working with the analyst to develop a more appropriate
Industry classification for Enron.  Media General currently classifies Enron
as a Basic Materials Wholesale company.

TAB S (Reuters MoneyNet) -- The data on this service is provided by Market
Guide (TAB M).

TAB T (Reuters Business Briefing) -- Reuters is in the process of updating
the Activities section for Enron, which includes changing the Company's name
to Enron Corp.; changing the IR contact to Mark Koenig; and updating the
number of employees at the Company.

TAB W (Value Line) -- Work in progress.

I will give the both of you a call tomorrow to discuss the next steps of the
project.

Michael


Mark,

Did you have a chance to review the E&P company model
(the old cash flow mode) and determine if it can be used
by Fred Lagrasta' group.

Please, let me know.

Vince


Dear InvestorPlace.com Member,

I've just revealed a BRAND-NEW wireless recommendation
to my subscribers, and I'm SO excited about this
opportunity that I want to share the details with you,
too.

You see, wireless growth is simply exploding around
the world -- especially after the September 11
terrorist attacks.  Cell phone giant Nokia, for
example, has skyrocketed 41% just since October
1st...worldwide wireless traffic is projected to grow a
whopping 30% in 2001 alone...China plans to spend $151
BILLION on its telecom infrastructure by 2005...and
that's just the very BEGINNING of what lies ahead for
this monstrous market!

Quite simply, the profit potential is huge, and I want
to make sure that my subscribers -- and now you -- get
a piece of the phenomenal gains ahead.  That's why I'm
so excited about my newest recommendation.  I expect
it to leap 50% in the next 12 months ALONE, and I'm
looking for more incredible gains after that.  Let me
show you why.

First, you might not even know about this, but there
has been an INTENSE tech competition over the last
couple of years for the new digital wireless standard.
That battle is now over -- and this company has WON!
That means their proprietary technology will be used
in most 2.5G cell phones (set to be deployed early in
2002), and in practically ALL of the next generation
3G phones.  That alone is a terrific boon for this
stock...but keep reading, because this opportunity gets
EVEN BETTER.

Not only does this company get paid for every one of
its chips used in 2.5G or 3G cell phones...but it also
gets paid a license fee from every single company that
wants to sell or market a cell phone based on its
winning technology.  And I'm not talking about a
simple one-time fee either-these royalties get paid on
a QUARTERLY BASIS, for as long as the technology is
used.  One day, thanks to the strength of their
technology, I fully expect this company to get paid
for EVERY single cell phone in use!

And with projections for 1.3 billion cell phone
subscribers by 2003 and continued steady growth in the
following years, this is an absolutely EXPLOSIVE
opportunity for my stock.  This is a $42 billion
company growing an incredible 27% per year and
spending an impressive 17% of revenues on research and
development -- EXACTLY the type of commitment to
future growth that makes me so confident they will
maintain their competitive edge and DOMINATE their
market space for years to come.

I can almost guarantee that you'll be kicking yourself
for years to come if you don't buy this stock now.
DON'T LET THAT HAPPEN TO YOU!  I revealed the name of
this company -- including my buy price, target price
and full profit details -- in the December issue of
Technology Investing, which just got released.

To make sure that you're on board for ALL the profits
we expect to make with this wireless dominator, all
you have to do is accept a RISK-FREE trial to
Technology Investing today.  (Just visit
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0VN167
to do so now.)  When you do, you'll get the December
issue of Technology Investing immediately, and I'll send
you up to 4 FREE bonus reports with all of the details on
my other tech and biotech recommendations.  Plus, your
subscription will be fully covered by my 100% MONEY-
BACK GUARANTEE.  That means if you're not completely
satisfied within the first 6 months, I'll refund every
single penny you've paid.  No questions asked.

Don't miss out on this monster profit opportunity!
Join Technology Investing today, and buy this hot
stock tomorrow for 50% gains in the next 12 months.
Visit
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0VN167
for details!

Sincerely,

Michael Murphy

P.S. The new issue is loaded with details on how you
can buy this WIRELESS DOMINATOR now.  Don't miss out.
Visit
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0VN167
and join today.

------------------------------------------------------

ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

We hope this free digest of investing advice is
valuable to you. If you'd like to change your e-mail
address (DON.BAUGHMAN@ENRON.COM), or unsubscribe, please
do so by going to the following address:

http://www.investorplace.com/unsubscribe.php

------------------------------------------------------

Friday Nov 23, 2001 09:52:01


No sign of chuck and not responding to messages. Team is bradford and carol st clair on master netting agreement. Joel ephross on issues reacquiring economic interests/swaps from jedi2/whitewing. Lisa mellencamp on any issues regarding pending litigation. I'm still running point until I find ward.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


During this critical time, it is imperative that our management team remain focused on our business and continue to address the challenges currently facing our company.  For that reason, I have decided to postpone the Enron Management Conference.

The Conference will now be held Friday, February 22 - Saturday, February 23, 2002 at the Westin La Cantera Resort in San Antonio.  While the Saturday meeting allows some Enron executives who cannot be away from the office during business hours to attend the Management Conference for the first time, I also recognize that it requires many of you to forfeit additional personal time on behalf of Enron.  I truly appreciate your sacrifice and I sincerely encourage your attendance.

The new agenda, while still being finalized, will be abbreviated but every bit as informative and worthwhile as previously planned.  We'll be in touch soon with more details.

Regards,
Ken Lay


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 02:07
PM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 01:57:25 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FINAL - January 2000 AGT volumes

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:03 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/27/99 01:58 PM

To: Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Frank Kronz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Melissa
Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Morgan
Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: FINAL - January 2000 AGT volumes

Here are the January daily volumes for each of the gates.    This is the
breakdown for 1/1.   For Boston Gas and S. Ct.  we are told what to deliver
and
we will know that on Thursday.   The number on the attached spreadsheet is our
estimate of what Boston Gas and S.Ct. should be.    We will fine tune those
two
ldc's on Thursday.    For the month of January we will need a range from 3200
dth to 4300 dth per day.   This large swing is normal for these types of
markets due to weekends, weather, and customer situations.

 - agt012000.xls


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]     Search  Amazon.com for:

 We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather  not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please  visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please  note that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  gerald.nemec@enron.com

[IMAGE]


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/11/2000 02:23 PM -----

	Susan J Mara@EES
	10/11/2000 02:12 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd:

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/11/2000 12:12
PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 10/11/2000 12:54:40 PM
To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>,
<dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>,
<glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <GTBL@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<j_dasovi@ect.enron.com>, <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<cfi1@tca-us.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd:

Attached are Frank Wolak's slides from his presentation at WPTF's meeting
last Friday.? Greg Blue asked that I send these to the board, although I
note that?a few?of you received them directly from Frank.
?
Dan
Received: from dymwsm07.mailwatch.com by ArterHadden.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2000
10:40:09 -0400
Received: from dymw0110.mailwatch.com (dymw0110.allegro.net [204.253.83.102])
by dymwsm07.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id e9AEaAL06385 for
<Douglass@@arterhadden.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:36:10 -0400
Received: from 204.253.83.71 by dymw0110.mailwatch.com with SMTP ( MailWatch
3.0(WSS) v4.3); Tue, 10 Oct 00 10:40:00 -0400
X-Server-Uuid: 66e863c0-6e3b-11d4-8628-00508bd3c8cd
Received: from zia.stanford.edu (zia.Stanford.EDU [171.64.233.220]) by
dymwsm09.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9AEaLH17504 for
<Douglass@@arterhadden.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:36:21 -0400
Received: from econ-wolak (econ-wolak.Stanford.EDU [171.64.233.175]) by
zia.stanford.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA04330; Tue, 10 Oct 2000
07:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4.1.20001010073312.00bb62b0@zia.stanford.edu>
X-Sender: wolak@zia.stanford.edu (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:37:06 -0700
To: GTBL@dynegy.com, lyncorum@earthlink.net, william.freddo@neg.pge.com,
rllamkin@seiworldwide.com, philm@SCDEnergy.com, mahoppe@calpx.com,
BWoertz@caiso.com, Douglass@@arterhadden.com, foothill@lmi.net
From: "Frank A. Wolak" <wolak@zia.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <86256972.001FC184.00@HOUNOTESSMTP1.Dynegy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 15FDF5CA563477-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;  boundary="=====================_1204143==_"

Here are my slides from the WPTF presentation as a .pdf file.

Frank Wolak
 - wptf.pdf


Not yet.  I told him that it wasn't super high priority but he will be
getting to it soon.

Chris

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Susan Spalding" <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
 11/22/2000 08:55 AM

Please respond to "Susan Spalding" <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
To: <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Smurfit Socal Plants

Any word yet from Dan?
----- Original Message -----
From: <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
To: Susan Spalding <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
Cc: <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Smurfit Socal Plants

>
> I will check with Dan.
>
> C
>
>
>
>
>  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  "Susan Spalding"
>  pic18935.pcx) <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
>                11/15/2000 09:58 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please respond to "Susan Spalding" <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
>
> To:   <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Smurfit Socal Plants
>
>
> Thanks!  Any update on the review of the Smurfit Standard contract?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
> To: Susan Spalding <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Smurfit Socal Plants
>
>
> >
> > Dan Hyvl
> > Enron Corportation
> > EB 3863
> > 1400 Smith Street
> > Houston, TX 770002
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
> >  image moved
> >  to file:      From:  "Susan Spalding"
> >  pic06617.pcx) <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> >                11/15/2000 08:52 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please respond to "Susan Spalding" <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> >
> > To:   <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Smurfit Socal Plants
> >
> >
> > I will fax you a copy if that's okay.  That way SSCC will only have to
> mail
> > the originals to one address.  Can you please provide Dan's address?
> >
> > Susan
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>
> > To: Susan Spalding <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 9:32 AM
> > Subject: Re: Smurfit Socal Plants
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That's fine.  Send them to Dan Hyvl with a copy to me.
> >
> > C
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
> >  image moved
> >  to file:      From:  "Susan Spalding"
> >  pic31107.pcx) <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> >                11/15/2000 06:13 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please respond to "Susan Spalding" <sspalding@summitenergy.com>
> >
> > To:   "Chris Foster" <chris.h.foster@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Smurfit Socal Plants
> >
> >
> >
> > I am working with Smurfit to get them to approve  and sign the new
> contract
> > for the 12/1/00 - 2/28/01 term. I appreciate  your patience. Is it okay
> > for Smurfit to print, sign, and mail two copies  of the contract that
you
> > emailed? If so, to what address should the  documents be mailed?
> >
> > Also, could you please give me an update on your  attorney's review of
> the
> > SSCC Standard Contract?
> >
> > Susan Spalding
> > Senior Energy Manager, Natural  Gas Services
> > Summit Energy Services, Inc.
> > 9920 Corporate Campus Drive,  Suite 2000
> > Louisville, KY 40223
> > (502) 429-3800
> > (502) 429-8333 Fax
> > sspalding@summitenergy.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Mark,

The bigger issue is what are we going to do with EE&CC.  If their time is
coming and we need to split them up then I would agree with this but
otherwise I am not sure this is the best thing to do.  I have had very little
actual work with EE&CC in the past year and can't really comment on their
effectiveness.

mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
07:34 AM ---------------------------

Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/11/2000 01:24 AM
To: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Frevert@Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Delainey, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS

Larry:

This fundamentally changes the entire basis of our approach to EECC and the
way that the engineering organization works. The idea was that the
engineering expertise resides in EECC.If u want to change that, it requires a
broader discussion.

Larry L Izzo
09/08/2000 04:37 PM
To: Mark Frevert@Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Delainey, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS

In light of the lesson learned on Project Lightening and in view of the
recent CALME reorganization, I suggest we simplify the payroll structure for
Development Engineers (DE's).  Currently, the DE's listed below are still on
EECC's payroll, although they are direct-line support to the Regions/Business
Units.  I suggest that all DE's transfer from EECC's payroll to the Business
Units they are supporting.  Some DE's are already on the regions' payrolls  I
don't think this will have a budget impact, because at this time each region
below is paying the total costs for these engineers, through EECC invoices.
Please let me know if each of you agree and I will have HR do the payroll
switch.

CALME (from EECC to Enron Global Markets)
Ken Koye
Mario Brunasso
Alice Weekley
Hemmat Safwat
Steve Sauer
Dave Glessner
Michael Worthem
Saad Merhej
Marion Cole
Omar Aboudaher
Celia Delahoussaye
Jan Dunn
Joni Moeller

APACHE (none)

INDIA (from EECC to Enron India)
Ken Bean
John Belew
Ram Tarakad
Debbie Perrotta

ESA (from EECC to Enron SA)
John R. Ayres
Mel Schultze (contractor)
Joy Oliver

ENA (from EECC to ENA)
Mike Coleman
Sandy Morris
Terri Austin
Juan Suarez
Bob Chmielewski
Bruce Golden
Steve Rose

LI41400


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 04:20
PM ---------------------------

Clem Cernosek@ECT
11/03/2000 02:28 PM
To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack
Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Megan
Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer D Pattison/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Teco's Indian Spring Plant

A meeting was held on November 1, 2000 at 3 pm in EB3270 to resolve Exxon's
residue volume issue at Teco's Indian Spring Plant.   Exxon's issue is that
the residue volumes that HPL is recording for Exxon's account for
transportation do not equal to the wellhead volumes produced and delivered to
PGE.

Items that were identified so that Exxon's Issue could be resolved:

 1.  HPL is responsible for any UA4 loss/gain and fuel consumed on PGE's line
attributable to Exxon's Big Sandy production.
 2.  If Exxon's production exceeds 500 mcf/d, HPL must on a monthly basis
elect to process or not process the Exxon Big Sandy Gas.  If HPL elects
to       process, then Teco buys the products from HPL.
 3.  If Exxon's production flows between 100 Mcf/d and 499 Mcf/d, then Teco
can process and makeup the shrinkage to HPL with their own gas volumes.
 4.  If Exxon's production is less than 100 Mcf/d, then HPL must terminate
the Processing Agreement.  If HPL does not terminate and volume continue
to        flow at less that 100 Mcf/d than HPL loses the shrinkage and must
pay to Teco an additional $500 per month.

Solution:
 1.  HPL will schedule and record the Gain/Loss Volumes at HPL Meter #986884
that is attributable to UA4 and Fuel on the PGE line.
 2.  HPL will schedule and record the sale volumes of PVR to Teco at HPL
Meter #986884.
 3.  The scheduling of the volumes for items  1 and 2 will allow for offset
volumes to be record as adjustments to Exxon's transport volumes.
 4.  The HPL Logistics dept. (Mary Poorman) will inform Assets Group (Jack
Simunek) when and if the volumes nominated for Exxon fall below 100 Mcf/d.

If any of the above does not reflect what was discussed or agreed to, please
let me know at X-36650.

Thanks, Clem


I gave to Kim Olinger.


Just a few notes on scheduling:

The new VESTAL_6_WDFIRE unit's counterparty name is SierraPower.  This was
being scheduled as Vestal but the counterparty name has been changed.

Also, there have been a few errors in scheduling the Wheelabrator units.
They should be scheduled as follows:

Wheelabrat:  MARTEL_2_AMFOR
WheelSHAST:  WSENGY_1_UNIT 4

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions,

Kourtney


Note the quote from Sibley - "California is giving deregulation a bad
name......"
Peggy
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/11/2000 01:31
PM ---------------------------

<fyi@mailman.enron.com> on 08/11/2000 10:19:49 AM
To: <pmahoney@enron.com>, <meberts@enron.com>, <fwanders@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Industry News: Despite Woes In California, Other States Push
Electricity De ...

-------------------------------------------------------------------
E-mailed by: Dow Jones Interactive (R) Server Software
Folder: Industry News
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Headlines:
Despite Woes In California, Other States Push Electricity
Deregulation

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  Despite Woes In California, Other States Push Electricity
Deregulation

Aug. 10, 2000
Dow Jones Online News
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Electricity deregulation has
suffered a setback
in California as the state grapples with short supply and rising prices.
But other states are pushing ahead with opening their power markets
to
competition, saying their approach should avoid the problems plaguing
the state which led the nation down the deregulation path four
years
ago.

  California has seen its power market roiled by heat waves that
left
the state scrambling to meet demand, and by soaring prices in San Diego
and southern Orange County, the first region of the country to have its
power market completely deregulated.

  "California is giving deregulation a bad name," said Texas state Sen.
David Sibley, a Republican who helped craft the bill to deregulate that
state's power industry. "But I still feel good about the bill we passed.
I feel even better about it."
  Deregulation backers outside of California said that state's
experience has been sullied by two basic shortcomings: insufficient
power generation to cover the state's demand and the exposure of retail
customers to market rates before a competitive retail market had
emerged.
  By contrast, Texas expects to have plenty of power generation on hand
when it opens its retail power markets to competition on Jan. 1, 2002.
  Unlike California -- where uncertain market conditions, local
opposition and, until recently, insufficient power prices have kept
power plant developers waiting in the wings -- Texas has attracted
billions of dollars in new power-plant investment.
  More than 10,000 megawatts will be added to the Texas grid before
competition begins, according to reports on new power plants. That's an
increase of about 20% over the state's current generating capacity.
  "The bill they passed did not send the right signals to the market,"
Sibley said of California, a Texas legislators visited before addressing
the issue in 1999. "We learned from California what we did not want to
do."
  Like Texas, Michigan hopes its success in attracting power-plant
developers to the state will help it avoid California's problems when it
allows customers to start choosing their power providers on Jan. 1,
2002. According to Gary Kitts, chief administrative officer at the
Michigan Public Service Commission, attracting independent power
producers is a key element for creating healthy competition and prices
at the retail level.
  Michigan is only in the early stages of writing the rules that will
restructure its power markets, but major developers already have begun
to show interest in building new plants in the state.
  Only days after the state passed its restructuring bills this spring,
Dallas-based Panda Energy International Inc., a privately held company,
announced plans to build a 1,000-megawatt plant by late 2004.
  Two new merchant plants already have broken ground, and three more are
in the planning stage, Kitts said.
  Likewise, Ohio regulators are hoping new power plant development will
spark healthy competition at the wholesale and retail level when
competition debuts Jan. 1, 2001.
  "We have quite a bit of generation going in the next year," said Ed
Hess, chief of the electricity division at the Ohio Public Utility
Commission.
  Ohio companies like Cinergy Corp. (CIN) and FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) are
either planning new Ohio generators or have recently brought new plants
on line.
  Like Michigan, Ohio companies won't have to sell off their plants as a
condition of deregulation and expose themselves to wholesale price
spikes as California utilities have had to do. Also, the state probably
won't see wholesale price caps similar to a $250 per megawatt-hour cap
approved last week by California's grid operator, Hess said.
  While caps can protect consumers from bloated wholesale power prices
in the short term, they can worsen the problem ultimately by deterring
development of the new power plants needed to correct supply shortages,
said Sam Rendazzo, a lawyer who represents an Ohio industrial users
group.
  "You're basically damping the pricing that developers are looking
for," he said. California is "perhaps the most dramatic evidence of a
market that's not functioning."
  In addition to counting on new generation, deregulation advocates
outside California also plan to insulate consumers from wholesale price
swings until competitive retail markets exist.
  Under the Texas restructuring law, utility rates are frozen until the
debut of competition. At that time, rates will drop 6% and hold there
for three years or until a utility has shed 40% of its customers to
competing retail suppliers.
  "There will be no authority to change rates until competition exists,"
said a Texas Public Utilities Commission spokeswoman.
  Michigan will also freeze its rates, Kitts said - for three or five
years, depending on the customer, in hopes giving competitive markets
time to develop.
  Nevertheless, California's high-profile woes are making it harder to
push deregulation elsewhere.
  Oklahoma, for example, has set a target of mid-2002 for the start of
retail competition. But the state has yet to work out the details in
legislation. The Oklahoma House of Representatives defeated a bill in
the final hour of this year's session, and a lawmaker said California's
problems will make deregulation a tougher sell in 2001.
  (Compiled from Dow Jones Newswires and other sources)
  Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones&Company, Inc.
  All Rights Reserved.

DJON0022405400

To view all headlines in the folder Industry News, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/browsearticles.asp?folderid=1

To go to the front page of Dow Jones Interactive Intranet Toolkit Server
Software, go to
http://eeshou-dowj1/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
For assistance, contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at
djip.itkhelp@dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S.
and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright  , 2000 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. All Rights
Reserved.


----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 02:41 PM -----

	ResExpert <ResExpert@travelsys.com>
	06/23/2000 02:26 PM

		 To: "'NEMEC/GERALD'" <PAT.RADFORD@ENRON.COM>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Travel Itinerary 17AUG IAH

**Please do not reply to this e-mail.**
**It will not go back to your travel counselor.**

NEMEC/GERALD             (IDS5C0413R01495)         23Jun00  03:27pm
                                                   NEMEC/GERALD

                                                   SUITE 3883

                                                   ETKT

Booking locator: Y8D7U7

17Aug00   09:23am   Thursday
Air   Continental Airlines   Flight# 587    Class:K Seat:18F
      From: Houston Intercontinen 17Aug00   09:23am   Thursday
      To:   Denver CO, USA        17Aug00   10:40am   Thursday
      Meal: None Equip: Mcdonnell Douglas Md Status: Confirmed

      Continental Airlines locator: OBY5BD
      CO Frequent Flyer# RA638270-NEMEC/GERALD

20Aug00   02:25pm   Sunday
Air   Continental Airlines   Flight# 1880   Class:K Seat:18F
      From: Denver CO, USA        20Aug00   02:25pm   Sunday
      To:   Houston Intercontinen 20Aug00   05:51pm   Sunday
      Meal: None Equip: Mcdonnell Douglas Md Status: Confirmed

      Continental Airlines locator: OBY5BD
      CO Frequent Flyer# RA638270-NEMEC/GERALD

19Oct00             Thursday
MISC  Houston Intercontinental, TX
      19OCT-** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

----------------------------------------
PAT RADFORD 853-9282
HADV THE AIRLINE OF YOUR FREQUENT FLYER NUMBER
THIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
FARES CHANGE FREQUENTLY. WE WILL HAPPILY RE-EVALUATE
YOUR FARE UPON REQUEST.
*******************************************************
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR E-TKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: OBY5BD
******************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 396.41 ROUNDTRIP NONREFUNDABLE

----------------------------------------

ResFAX(r) Copyright(c) 1992-2000 Automated Travel Systems, Inc., New York,
NY

***ResFAX Message ID 289629***
***ResFAX Itinerary E-Mail***

 - C.DTF


Chris,

E hired Tony to support Global Markets but Jeff Shankman decided that, given
highly specialized nature of his work it makes sense to put him in the
Research Group, with a dotted line to Mike Roberts who is running our weather
group.

Given that his work will directly and exclusively benefit GM, it makes sense
for Research to charge his expenses
to Global Markets. We can adjust allocations to reflect his contributions to
different sub-units of GM.

Tony spent the last few weeks in Houston training for his position in London
with Mike Roberts.
We are very excited about the prospect of working with him.

Vince

Chris Mahoney
04/05/2001 03:56 AM
To: Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Moncrieff/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT, Christie
Marshall/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Smith/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tony Hamilton

Tony was hired to work for Global Markets.   Think costs should be assigned
to Vince or Mark but if you
believe those costs should be for my group let me know.

Tani Nath
05/04/2001 09:33
To: Chris Mahoney/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Moncrieff/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre
Aury/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Christie Marshall/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Smith/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tony Hamilton

I now have Tony on one of my RCs (research).  I understand he will be doing
weather forecasts for some or all of you, and that he has a desk allocated in
Global.  I need to recharge his costs  - can someone please advise the right
cost centre.

Many thanks,

Tani


Joe,

Below are articles that state that deregulation is better for everyone in the
long run and though the California issue is bad, currently, it is not because
of deregulation, but because of transmission and generation issues.

''A deregulated world is the right market for electricity,'' said Ron Walter,
senior vice president at Calpine, an independent power producer in San Jose
that is building three plants.

New York Times Article
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
The root cause of California's electricity crisis is regulation, not
deregulation.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------

Other States are learning from CA deregulation and believe that there
deregulation will be more successful. Electric utility deregulation is
sending up sparks in California, but that's not short-circuiting other
states' plans.
At least for now, many are pledging to learn from California's mistakes and
forge ahead by opening their own markets.
Texas, Ohio and Michigan are among 25 that have passed deregulation laws but
not yet put them into effect. The three heavy industrial electricity users
have big plans for competition.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

Enron is mentioned in this article along with Boeing stating that..."We've
certainly been exposed to the higher prices, and it's uncomfortable in the
short term," said Keith Warner, the energy manager at Boeing, which spends
about $200 million on power in the U.S. annually. "But in the long term,
deregulation and open access (to transmission from other electric companies)
is where we want to be. In every deregulation we've gone through in this
country, competition has lowered prices."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
This shows a more even view of deregulation stating its faults and its
advantages. "The lack of supply has to do with deregulation and the
uncertainty of a financial return on new investment of generation,"
Borenstein said. "But we still would have a supply problem under regulation
and prices would still be high."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Mercury News article states it is not time to re-regulate the markets and
provides the following solutions to solve the crisis. Article Below.
Matters will improve when California has:
-> More sources of power.
-> A more sophisticated electricity market.
-> Smarter consumers -- that is, consumers with the information they need to
be thrifty.
Also the article talks of the Power Exchange (PX) and the Independent System
Operators (ISO) and how these two groups are making the prices higher; i.e
market imperfections that result from the uniqueness of electricity as a
commodity and the immaturity of the new exchanges are enabling producers to
obtain higher prices than the underlying conditions dictate.
Article concludes by saying the deregulated market is just beginning and with
a few adjustments will work out fine


Dear Team Members:

Our general presentation on campus at UT has been scheduled for Monday,
January 22 from 6:30 - 8:00pm.  Sally Beck will be our presenter.

I am working to schedule participants, and I have slated each of you to
attend.  Are you available?

Please reply as soon as possible in order for me to insure adequate coverage.

Details will be sent to you once you have confirmed.

Thank you!

lexi
3-4585


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000
03:18 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  <Steven_T_Sweet@calpx.com>                           12/18/2000 01:47
PM

To: Market_Participant_AB1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_CD2@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_EG1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_HJ1@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_KL2@calpx.com, Market_Participant_MN1@calpx.com,
Market_Participant_OR1@calpx.com, Market_Participant_OR2@calpx.com
cc: Communications@calpx.com
Subject: CalPX CEO responds to FERC

The following is a response from California Power Exchange CEO George Sladoje
regarding the FERC order released last Friday.

(See attached file: GS letter 12.18.00.doc)

 - GS letter 12.18.00.doc


>> You signed up to receive special offers at Colonize.com <<

Joseph,

Type your last name in the FOUNDMONEY search engine
and see if you can find CASH that belongs to you...INSTANTLY!

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

This site has been featured on:

* "Oprah Winfrey",
* "Maury Povich",
* "Discovery Channel",
*  And many other TV and radio shows.

*  Search through 30 MILLION forgotten accounts
*  Records date back to the early 1900s..

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

True Story
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gail Sperry, from San Diego, California, searched FOUNDMONEY
and found $59,839.12, left by her deceased husband. Because
this was not in her husband's will, she would've never found
it had she not visited FOUNDMONEY

Facts
------------------------------------------------------------------
3 in 4 North American families own money that is LOST in banks,
insurance companies, etc. SOME OF IT MAY BE YOURS! Search
FOUNDMONEY Just type your last name in the search engine!
See if there is money you never knew you had...INSTANTLY!

Go look now! http://www.colonize.com/c.php3?i=fmnx3,10241,x2&e=33676806

~~~~~~~~~~
Questions? Comments? Email us at: info@colonize.com
You are currently subscribed as: joe.stepenovitch@enron.com
To unsubscribe visit:
http://www.colonize.com/u.php3?e=joe.stepenovitch@enron.com


Attached is a form that might work, let me know what changes are needed.

Galen


Dave - louie said you would want to see this....
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/28/2000
10:47 AM ---------------------------
ET & S Business Intelligence
From: Lorna Brennan on 03/28/2000 10:52 AM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julie McCoy/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lou
Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sarabeth Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary
Sova/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rob Wilson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kristen Hand/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hartfield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael Ratner/OTS/Enron, Michael
Ratner/OTS/Enron, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Bollinger/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Badura/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janet
Bowers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Burleson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Allen Cohrs/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Fiscus/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret Fritch/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan Gottsponer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Harvey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Herber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dana
Jones/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Joyce/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
Korbelik/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Mangels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Penny
McCarran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Perales/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Perry/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Loren
Penkava/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ken Powers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Sebesta/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank Semin/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Neal
Shaw/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry Swett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Threet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike Ullom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Valley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Chuck Wilkinson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Wiltfong/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Lagerstrom/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ray Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Stevens/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Barry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Don Powell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Weller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael G Stage/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Johanson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frank
Oldenhuis/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rita Bianchi/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Trade Press on PG&E Issue

PG&E Fights Toxin in Gas Stream, Movie Fallout

     Sunday's Oscar winners have nothing on San Francisco's venerable Gran
Dame of
     combination energy utilities, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., whose film
career and notoriety
     seem destined to win increasing Hollywood scrutiny if not gold
statuettes.

     Look no further than your local first-run movie theaters and the
real-life drama, "Erin
     Brockovich," taking the actual name of the latest heroine to put PG&E's
familiar logo in
     the klieg lights. Unfortunately for PG&E, toxins like chromium or PCBs
in association
     with its gas pipelines can create their own dramas.

     Just as the new movie, starring Julia Roberts, hit the theaters earlier
this month, a new
     real-life problem confronted the combination utility with contaminates
getting into the
     southern part of its California gas transmission system.

     The movie is the story of a legal assistant --- a twice-divorced mother
of three young
     children --- who single-handedly challenges PG&E, exposing its alleged
operating
     mistakes that led to the use of chromium in its pipelines and eventually
in the local water
     supply of a small, remote, high-desert town called Hinkley, which is
about 130 miles
     northeast of Los Angeles. Lawsuits emerged in the early 1990s based on
the
     development of tumors and other health problems among many of the
Hinkley residents.
     By PG&E's own admission decades earlier it legally discharged wastewater
containing
     chromium into the ground at its compressor station near Hinkley. Some of
the chromium
     eventually got into the groundwater, and PG&E acknowledges it "did not
respond to (that)
     problem as openly, quickly or thoroughly as it should have." It provided
drinking water to
     nearby residents and arranged for medical exams for residents wishing to
have them.
     PG&E also worked with local and state officials to clean up the problem.
In 1996,
     however, PG&E settled a class action suit (one of several) with 650
Hinkley residents for
     a record $333 million.

     "The movie is a dramatization and it is pretty entertaining, so I liked
it," said Jon
     Tremayne, a PG&E utility spokesperson.

     PG&E CEO Robert Glynn told his employees, "It's clear in retrospect that
our company
     should have handled some things differently at that time. And I wish
that it had."

     Litigation against the big energy firm continues. Involving the same
transmission pipeline
     and geographical areas, the current PCBs found in PG&E's interstate
supplies are
     coming through Enron's Transwestern Pipeline unit at the
California-Arizona border from
     New Mexico but are not at harmful levels at this point in time. Routine
testing early in
     February turned up the suspected cancer-causing chemical, which was used
as a
     lubricant in high-pressure pipelines and compressor stations until it
was banned.

     "What we are talking about here is very low levels (ranging from 2 to 22
parts-per-million,
     or ppm), well below (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) levels
(50 ppm),"
     according to Tremayne.

     Since the installation of a series of filter separators on both sides of
the
     California-Arizona border, PG&E has concentrated on testing and
following up along its
     southern transmission system that extends some 350 miles to the town of
Kettleman in
     the northwestern part of the central San Joaquin Valley. PCB traces have
been found,
     and PG&E has been working with the local gas distributor in the area,
Southwest Gas
     Corp., to test for signs of PCBs in the nearby Barstow and Victor Valley
distribution
     systems. As of March 22, none of the definitive results were in and
there won't be much
     before the end of this month, according to Tremayne.

     Both state regulators and the federal EPA have been notified of the
situation. The federal
     EPA confirmed that PCBs are authorized for use in concentrations below
50 ppm. It is
     the EPA laboratory tests that showed PCBs were known to cause cancer in
laboratory
     rats.

     PG&E spokespeople were assuring the public last week that the utility
will "take any
     additional actions necessary" as a result of data from the ongoing
testing it is doing of its
     transmission system and interconnecting distribution pipeline systems.
And the utility is
     planning to install additional filter separators at various locations
along its pipeline.

     PCB-containing lubricating oils once were used routinely by a number of
U.S. pipeline
     companies in their gas pipeline compressors, which help push the fuel
through the pipes.
     While they are no longer used, some of the oils have remained inside
some pipelines since
     the 1960s and 70s. If present, they are carried in liquid droplets in
the natural gas stream.

     Between the newly released motion picture and PG&E's local wrestling
match with the
     PCBs, another class action lawsuit against PG&E stemming from the
original chromium
     issue heads toward trial, pushed by residents in Topock, AZ and former
residents of
     Hinkley not involved in the first suit. A trial date has been set for
Nov. 27, and CNN's
     "CourtTV" program is proposing to provide live coverage.


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/09/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/09/2000 09:06:45 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>, <Darren.espey@enron.com>, <mschrab@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: HI325 and HI 368 Revision Effective 6/10/00 (HIOS P/L)

Please see the attached revisions to be effective 6/10/00 on HI 325 and HI
368 platforms.

Darren - We will probably make another change to HI 368 effective Tuesday,
June 13 once we hear from the pipeline on reallocating the gas.  I will let
you if we need to change the nom for Tuesday, June 13.

Please let me know of any questions you have.

Thanks,

 - HI325reveff061000.xls
 - HI368reveff061000.xls


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/14/00.

Regards,
Molly


According to Cliff Shedd, we would be covered by insurance if we terminated
the contract with Furnas and Furnas failed to pay the termination payment.
However the insurers will only pay after we receive an arbitration judgement
against them and the refuse to honor the judgement.  I assume we would also
have to exhaust our remedies against trhe guarantor (Eletrobras).

Also, we are required to notify the underwriters immediately of a material
default.


I entered all the Mega deals in CAPS. We have them for at least another Month.  I also updated the excel sheet for Mega and created a JUNE folder. June 1 file is also set up in that folder.  I have not pulled the June data into that file.  I have not checked out with anyone for June.  They will be ready to '
check out on Tuesday.  Make a point to call CRC and get any sc trades they have.

Callaway is a new deal we have .  The info I have is that it will be a sale for 9MW flat every day for 5years.  This is an EES deal. and will need to be entered on the EES sheet and entered on CAPS.  I think APX1 will be the SC.  Foster and Richter know about this deal. Just make sure it is accounted for as an EES deal, it will not appear in Enpower.

There is a wind deal that Elliot did with Edwards Air Force Base.  I don't have enough info on this yet. It starts June 1.


552673 - changed to sell

Missing trades should be in now. Let me know if they're not.

Stephanie Piwetz   03/16/2001 12:32 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: checkout 3/16/01

prebon 3/16/01
deal 552673.01   prebon shows Enron Sells
prebon
missing badeer trade:  Enron Buys Reliant Ser 300.00   25mws  June Sp 15
missing swerzbin/or motley:  Enron buys PNew Mexico May  275.00 PV  25 mws

thanks


Notice No. 01-94
March 16, 2001

TO:
All Exchange Members

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
NYMEX ACCESSc Web Site

Effective Sunday, March 18, 2001, the NYMEX ACCESS? web site will be
temporarily unavailable.

Please call the NYMEX ACCESS Control Center (NACC) for all NYMEX ACCESS price
information at 1-800-438-8616.

We will provide an update regarding the status of the web site by Monday.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-94)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Teco Tap       120.000 / HPL IFERC ; 20.000 / Enron

LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


fyi
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000 11:43 AM -----

	Gary Ackerman <foothill@lmi.net>
	11/06/2000 11:41 PM
	Please respond to foothill

		 To: Bill Ross <billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>,
Carolyn Baker <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, CHARLES A MIESSNER
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, Corby Gardin <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, curt
hatton <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Denice Cazalet <dcazalet@apx.com>, Greg
Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Jack Pigott <jackp@calpine.com>, Ken Czarnecki
<Ken_J_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, Kent Wheatland <KEWH@dynegy.com>, "Klemstine,
Barbara A(F56661)" <barbara_klemstine@apses.com>, Randy Hickok
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, Rob
Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger
Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>, Sue Mara <smara@enron.com>, Jeff Crowe
<jcrowe@apx.com>, Dan Douglass <douglass@arterhadden.com>
		 cc:
		 bcc:
		 Subject: Draft Comments for Thursday

Folks,

Here is my first draft.  My time trial shows it takes 6 min and 45
seconds to deliver.  We need to cut.

Dan, can you send me a front end to this that I will utilize to make
copies?  Send me the front end from last week's filing supporting EPSA's
motion.

I'll take comments up to 12 noon Wednesday.
gba
=============================

The Western Power Trading Forum (WPTF) is a California non-profit trade
association of almost thirty members who sell, buy and exchange power
throughout the Western U.S.  We are pleased to provide comments on the
following areas in response to your Order issued last week.

1. Price caps and their unintended consequences

2. Forward scheduling, penalties, mandatory must-buy, and

3. Independent Governing Boards.

First, I would like to take this opportunity to express our overall
gratitude to the Commission for issuing its Order.  The members of WPTF
have been bitterly frustrated by the events of the last summer, and
equally upset by the actions of non-jurisdictional parties in their
attempt to grab the steering wheel of restructuring, and drive it into
the ground. As I listened to your comments last week, I took note of all
the things you said, and the stated purpose of your actions.  After
listening to you, and reading the Order, I very much wanted to be here
today, even if it only afforded me a brief 5-minutes of your time.  I
would have flown here from California even if you only allowed me one
phrase to be uttered publicly.  And that phrase would be "Thank you.
Thank you for taking the bold step forward to revive California's
wholesale power market.  Thank you for having the courage to stand up to
parochial interests which are entirely self serving, and absent of any
national policy goals."

This Commission took a stab at correcting California's problems
utilizing several measures, one of which was a $150 price cap.  Whereas
we applaud the Commission's effort,  we find that price caps send the
wrong signal to both suppliers and load.  We have found that price caps
misallocate resources, and as your Staff report demonstrates, increases
exports of power to other parts of the grid where no caps exists.  We
find that price caps discourage demand-side participation, and at the
level proposed, will discourage much needed peaking generation
resources.  We also find that any price cap, but especially at the level
you have proposed, will create unintended consequences.  For example,
when market bids exceed $150, sellers will avoid bidding into the ISO or
the PX.  Will the market solution be as simple as bidding instead into a
competitive exchange to the PX, such as APX, or AlTrade?  Will the
liquidity of the bids suddenly flip from one market to another because
of an arbitrary line below which the single price auction operates, and
above which the bilateral market prevails?  That is a huge hammer, a
huge movement of tens of millions of dollars moving within the space of
an hour from one trading vehicle to another.

WPTF has been against price caps, and continues to believe that price
caps do much damage, and do not protect consumers.  The damages include
prolonging high prices, reducing price discovery, and reducing the
quantity of long-term offers that otherwise would afford consumers
much-needed price protection.  Average prices do not diminish with caps,
in fact, as you know, August prices in California were much higher than
last June, even though the buyer price cap imposed by the ISO Governing
Board was $250 instead of $750.

We recognize that the political reality is such that regulators don't
like price spikes, and caps are a quick solution.  If you feel that
price caps must be imposed, then limit the damage.  We believe that
Commissioner Hebert's price cap proposal which starts at $250, and
increments upward by specific amounts at specific times would be the
least damaging.  We also believe that a formulaic price cap that moves
with respect to demand, or fuel price would be the most harmful.  Market
participants can not conduct business with so much uncertainty hanging
in the balance.  The Commission recognized on the matter of Governance
that California needs regulatory stability, and the Commission is
pursuing policy options to regain much needed stability.  On the other
hand, floating price caps work in the opposite direction.  They reek
havoc because they inject more uncertainty, and lessen stability.  If
price caps are at all necessary, stick to the least damaging approach.

WPTF supports forward scheduling of demand, the imposition of real-time
penalties, and we support elimination of the must-buy provision embedded
in the California PUC Preferred Policy Decision.  Underscheduling of
load has been a practice that has lead to economic dislocation, and
reduced grid reliability.  Mandatory pre-scheduling will get the ISO
back on track by prudently limiting the amount of load that can be
exposed to real-time resolution.  Also, by eliminating the must-buy
provision, the UDCs can no longer complain about "supply not showing
up". Their avenues for finding cost-effective supply will be unlimited.

Finally, we support the replacement of the stakeholder boards with
independent board members.  Whereas we have been troubled by the antics
of the ISO Governing Board, we must note that the PX Governing Board has
not had the same type of problems. The PX Governing Board has done much
better at finding solutions to thorny problems.  But it is asking too
much, we think, to spare one and eliminate the other.  The actions of
the ISO Governing Board have proven to be highly damaging to the
credibility of electric restructuring.  Other states eschew
restructuring after observing the endless debates, the layers upon
layers of State interference in the workings of the California ISO
Governing Board, and the leverage exercised by voting blocks of
Governors with interests totally removed from the well-being of the very
institution on whose Board they serve.

We are concerned that the rules you have laid out for replacing the
stakeholder Governing Board may not be enough.  There may be incredible
pressure placed upon the existing Board members to select candidates
that further the aims of those that claim to protect consumers, but in
fact, are making a power grab.  My organization promises the Commission
that if we suspect, if we have evidence, if we detect, or otherwise
observe actions by a few to undermine the independence of a new Board, I
can assure you I will be back here raising my voice loudly in protest.
The California market simply can not survive serving two masters.  The
jurisdictional tug of war must end quickly so that we all can move
forward and pursue the goals and ambitions set out by this Commission in
Orders 888, and 2000.

Thank you.


Hello everyone!

I hope you're having a great holiday season.  I'm sure everyone is very busy.
Thanks for all your help while I was gone.
My husband and I had a great honeymoon.

I will be here on Monday, but will be gone on Wednesday--
back on Thursday.

Have a great weekend and if you are taking time off--
ENJOY!

Jen


houston would be easy    ireland kinda tough

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/13/2001 12:51 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: how are your broker relationships?

what is the probability of you procuring some U2 tickets? We would dearly
love to attend the concert in ireland at slane castle in august....I couldn't
dial fast enough to get them
Jen Fraser

713-853-4759


Please find the attached EES Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for
7/31/2000.   I expect our position to be about 300 contracts shorter on Nymex.

Thanks,

Monica Hwang


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001
01:34 PM ---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
01/11/2001 10:17 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Cooper Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Preliminary 2001 Northwest Hydro Outlook

Here's our first cut at a full year hydro projection:  Please keep
confidential.


You're invited to search and register:

Tuesday, March 6

Investinme.enron.com is a new tool to help you manage your professional
development.
It brings together the listings of internal programs, as well as access to a
database of
external programs, on-line courses and materials

Double Click  and select launch.

Web site demonstrations
EB 568 on March 5, from 1-5 PM (every hour), and March 6, from 9-5 (every
hour)

Questions?  Please call the EWS Development Center  X 3-0357.


We do in fact have a lot of captive markets.  I don't have a problem with S&P
saying that, although I wouldn't want Enron saying it too often.  In general
I'm OK.  Thanks. DF

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           06/14/2000 08:57 AM

To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum
cc: Gina Taylor/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

I have a little discomfort with the reference a couple of times, that our
customers have no options.  If used and published this could impact us on our
argument related to risk of market.  Drew, what do you think??  MK

	From:  Bob Chandler                           06/13/2000 10:16 AM

To: Gina Taylor/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

Tim Despain  received a draft copy of S&P annual review from the S&P rep.  He
was given the opportunity to comment on the draft.  The annual review will be
an S&P analysis, not an Enron release.  Dave Neubauer didn't change the
wording much from the original S&P draft, but his changes improved the
original draft.  Here's how it looked before his edits:

Northern Natural Gas Company:
(Northern Natural is a huge pipeline system that dominates gas deliveries in
Minnesota and parts of Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, and South Dakota.  The
system,s above-average business profile reflects the only moderate amount of
direct pipeline competition the company faces in its service area.  The
upper-Midwest is a particularly cold region that uses a lot of natural gas,
and Northern Natural,s customers (mainly gas utilities and municipalities)
have little options for other fuels.  Thus, the pipeline is in a strong
position to maintain existing sales and garner any new load.  Throughput
growth has been modest.  Although there is some ongoing recontracting risk as
firm transportation service contracts expire, most customers have no other
options other than Northern Natural.  Competition for at-risk capacity is
stiff, given the excess pipe capacity available on the other Midwest
pipelines and the new pipeline construction in the Midwest.  Northern Natural,
s cost structure is very competitive.  A major rate case was settled in 1999
that extended many firm contracts with most of its customers.

If anyone has further comments, I would suggest sending them directly to Tim
Despain.

Gina Taylor@EES
06/13/2000 09:45 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

Bob,

Good Morning!

This write-up made it back to me for my reveiw.  Has Mary Kay Miller reviewed
this?  And what about Scott Vonderheide in Investor Relations?  I think both
of these groups need to sign off on this.

Gina

---------------------- Forwarded by Gina Taylor/HOU/EES on 06/13/2000 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Deb Cappiello@ENRON
06/13/2000 08:29 AM

To: Gina Taylor/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

This is what Dave Neubauer sent to Schafer.  Just wanted to make sure you are
ok with that.  Please give me a call after you review.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron on 06/13/2000
08:25 AM ---------------------------

Dave Neubauer
06/12/2000 05:41 PM
To: Deb Cappiello/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron on 06/12/2000
05:37 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Bob Chandler                           06/12/2000 04:19 PM

To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc: Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Standard and Poor's Annual Review

Here is Dave Neubauer's revised draft for NNG's section of the S&P report:

Northern Natural Gas Company:
Northern Natural is a large pipeline system that provides gas deliveries into
Minnesota and parts of Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, and South Dakota.  The
system,s above-average business profile reflects only a moderate amount of
direct pipeline competition. The upper-Midwest is a particularly cold region
with heavy natural gas usage. Although throughput growth has been modest,
many of Northern Natural,s customers (mainly gas utilities and
municipalities) do not have dual fuel capabilities.  This allows Northern
Natural to maintain existing sales and garner any new load. Competition for
at-risk capacity is stiff, given the excess pipe capacity available and under
construction on other Midwest pipelines. Northern has some ongoing
recontracting risk over the next five to seven years, but maintains a very
competitive cost structure.  A major rate case was settled in 1999 that
extended many firm contracts with most of its customers.


Sounds like man night was a success, noone was violated and Eriks ass grape didn't get him down.

Sorry I couldn't make it but will make the next one.
>
> From: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>
> Date: 2002/03/01 Fri AM 10:59:00 CST
> To: bcorrier@cox-internet.com, knipe3@msn.com, chet_fenner@bmc.com, c.r.zander@att.net, Joe.Parks@enron.com, john.chambers@bisys.com, brianc@saltgrass.com
> Subject: RESULTS OF MAN NIGHT
>
> Had fun. Glad to see everyone at the Hybrid man night. Reported to Zander,
> who was glad to hear we enjoyed the food. Joe that was not a TV dinner.
> We still need to take care of the deer lease food/beer issues. ....whenever.
> FYI John (Wollam) is fine. Has a pulled muscle in his neck.
> Enjoyed eating eyes, eye socket fatty tissue, head meat, talking about how
> much I care for my dog, eating heart meat, men playing with their meat,
> bowel distress and "grapes" and seeing how it played out for the one MAN
> audience.
> I doubt Dave Wieland will join us again and Ted will likely be asked to turn
> down the next invitation to join us by his friend.
> I give the food an A+, service was also excellent. Chad gets the award for
> being most "in" to the effort.
> I will mark my calendar for 60 days to rip a thread for the next effort. e.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2001
09:46 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/02/2001 09:36 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/2/01


Many of you have friends who are no longer with the company, so we wanted to provide you an overview of continuing efforts to assist Enron's former employees.

CAREER SERVICES
Last December Enron established a website to assist former employees identify jobs in Houston and throughout the United States.  Only former Enron employees and potential employers can access the site, http://careerservices.enron.com/

On this site, former employees can:
	? Post their resumes for approved employers to view
	? View job postings
	? Receive updates and information on career and community services available to them
As of January 25, 2002:
	? More than 1,300 companies had been approved to view resumes
	? Company recruiters had logged on more than 3,500 times to search for candidates
	? More than 600 jobs had been posted on the site

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
The Greater Houston Community Foundation
The Greater Houston Community Foundation (GHCF), in collaboration with the United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast, the Houston Area Urban League, Crisis Intervention of Houston, and Career and Recovery Resources, have established a fund to provide dedicated support for former Enron employees.  GHCF offers former employees counseling services and helps them work with mortgage companies, landlords and utilities to defer monthly bills while they are out of work.   If you are interested in making a tax-deductible donation to the GHCF, please call 713-268-6458 or mail donations to GHCF at 4550 Post Oak Place, Suite 317, Houston, TX  77027.  Checks should be made payable to Greater Houston Community Foundation and designated for the Enron Employee Transition Fund.  To receive assistance, former employees can call 713-533-4598, or outside Houston, 1-800-493-4598.  Lines are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account
A former employee has established the Enron Ex-Employee Relief Fund Account at the Humble Community Bank.  Visit the website at <http://www.eerfa.com> for more information or to make a donation.  Former employees can submit grant requests to eerfarequest@surfmk.com.

MDPC Transitional Assistance Program
Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church has created a Transitional Assistance Program open to both members and non-members who need assistance re-entering the workforce.  Right Management Consultants offers a series of two-day workshops for former employees on topics such as Career Assessment and Evaluation, Job Search Communication and Managing in a Time of Change.  Requests for limited and discretionary short-term financial assistance will be accepted from those who have participated in this program.  MDPC will offer a holistic approach to re-entering the workforce including family counseling and stress management. For more information, contact Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church at 713-953-2550, ext 180.


Please attend one of these sessions.  Gracias.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Thomas Engel                           02/07/2000 02:49 PM

To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect,
Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Shring/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa
Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Mathews/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Seaman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Cordes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jay Reitmeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P
Radous/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Tomaski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA DEMO - NEW RISK ASSIGNMENT

THE NEW SITARA RISK ASSIGNMENT RELEASE IS SCHEDULED
FOR THE WEEKEND OF FEBRUARY 19-21.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT YOU ATTEND ONE OF THE
FOLLOWING DEMOS:

WHERE: EB 2537

WHEN: FEB 16TH  - 1:00 - 2:15
  FEB 16TH  - 2:30 - 3:45
  FEB 16TH  - 4:00 - 5:15
  FEB 17TH  - 3:30 - 4:45

Space is limited - call the SITARA HOTLINE for time slot availability
(x3-7049).

Please make every effort to attend one of these demos.

There are some major changes to SITARA that will result in a transformation
of every deal with risk assignment.
This release includes the introduction of financial deal types needed for
SITARA valuation and eventual replacement
of CPR and TAGG systems for natural gas.

You are encouraged to invite anyone you believe may be interested in
attending.


You're right. This deal does not need to be confirmed again, says Monica
Lande. I'll change it in the system as soon as our calc is done today - about
4:30 p.m. PST.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
11/27/2000 02:34 PM
To: Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #385852

I think this deal should have been entered as "no confirm."  Can you please
change it?  If I am wrong, please let me know.
Thanks!
Kim


Thanks again for the Easter goodies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Ed:

Further to my voice mail of earlier today, the CI guaranty appears to be
limited in duration but there is not a specific term.  How long must the
guaranty remain effective?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Kay:

As I mentioned, this e-mail was the product of a meeting this week with
Duran, Deffner, Bills and me. I need your help to make this work with respect
to the legal group, and would like your suggestions. I'll call you to discuss.

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 06:54 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby                           05/10/2001 06:51 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Chris Booth, Raimund Grube, Jeffrey Keenan, Steve Krimsky, Greg Krause,
Rick Whitaker, Fred Mitro, Rusty Stevens, Ron Tapscott, Matt Gimble
cc: W David Duran
Subject: Interface with Accounting and Global Finance

Guys:

As you all know, our group is in the middle of a very significant amount of
development and equipment book management activity, This hard work by all of
you has allowed us to achieve very impressive income results thus far this
year, and has set the stage for continued success. It has also placed
significant demands on internal resources that are integral to our success,
in particular those resources in Global Finance, Accounting, and Legal.

In order to ensure a proper prioritization of work flow, and that project
specific objectives and time lines are communicated, I need each of you to
come to me with all new agreements prior to seeking input from Accounting and
Global Finance. I will interface with these two groups and establish
priorities for their review.

We will continue to refine how we interface with these groups, and as such,
I'd appreciate any suggestions you would have. I plan to have a staff meeting
next week, and we can discuss it at that time.

Thanks,

Ben


Ravi,

Please, take a look at the book review.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
05/16/2000 01:54 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Book review

Excellent! Where was this published? I would like to have a photocopy of the
published review.
Krishna.

Vince J Kaminski
05/16/2000 12:48 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Book review

Reviewed by Mark Williams, SVP Risk
Management, Citizens Power

The long awaited second edition of Managing Energy
Price Risk has finally arrived. It has been four years
since the first edition was published. During this hiatus,
a lot has happened as risk management within the
rapidly expanding energy industry has come of age as
a respected discipline. The second edition is a rich
compilation of papers by a surprisingly representative
group of industry leaders, practitioners and academics.

The books strength is that it reinforces the fact that
risk management principles initially applied to a narrow
band of energy commodities can and should be applied
across a wide array of energy commodities including
electricity. As expected the book does a solid job in
capturing an international perspective on the various
challenges, which are not isolated to any one
continent but are global in scope. It includes a lengthy
introduction that effectively frames risk management
progress, advancements and innovations that started
in the oil markets in the 1970's and migrated to the
natural gas and most recently expanding to the
electricity industry.

Managing Energy Price Risk is comprised of 15
chapters, all of which include an introduction, which
minimises the disjointedness that you may expect from
a book written by a large number of authors. Other
improvements in this second edition include expanded
graphics, highlighted panels, detailed appendices and a
separate glossary, which provides the reader with
additional reference material.

In particular the chapter on energy options written by
Michael Hampton is a useful primer and provides the
reader with a concise explanation of option theory,
pricing, basis risk, delta hedging as well as practical
guidelines for distinguishing between hedging and pure
speculation. For the more advanced reader, the
chapter on Energy Exotic Options, written by Vince
Kaminski, Stinson Gibner and Krishnarao Pinnamaneni is
particularly strong as it outlines the challenges
associated with the exotics and effectively documents
the latest methods used by leading practitioners in
pricing such instruments.

Additionally, the chapter on Accounting for Derivative
Contracts in the Energy Environment by three
consultants from Arthur Anderson, is a well written
summary which addresses the numerous tax related
issues including a timely discussion on the US Financial
Accounting Standards Board's Statement 133 (see
EPRM October 1999, page 22). Having this tax
information housed in one concise chapter is of great
value.

The second edition however is not without flaws. In
particular, it would have been useful to have more
information on the current challenges risk managers
are confronted with in the power industry including
latest advancements in volatility and correlation
estimation techniques. Additional attention could have
also been placed on the shortcomings of the current
market structure and methods in finding and applying
appropriate hedging strategies and instruments. In the
fledgling power market, this continues to be one of the
primary challenges.

In summary, this second edition of Managing Energy
Price Risk builds upon the sentinel work laid out in the
prior edition and is a valuable reference book for the
new recruit or seasoned veteran. It is a welcome
edition to any risk management library.


Someone named Brian Hoskins called on the Hotline at lunch today and wanted
to know what was going on with John Arnold's inquiry into the Citibank sub
discussed below.  Does anyone have any information on this ?

To: Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: ISDA with Citibank Subsidiary

Shankman was pushing something with a Citibank sub about 3 months ago.  I
think we were waiting on information from them.

Russell/Brant - please call their contact and request credit information on
the Citibank sub.  Let John Arnold know where we stand after your
discussion.  Loop in Paul for any credit analysis associated with hedge
funds.

Keep me apprised as well.

Bill

From:  Mary Tudon
08/04/2000 09:11 AM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ISDA with Citibank Subsidiary

Everybody,

Tanya suggested I ask all of you if you know anything related to a hotline
call I took yesterday afternoon.  I got a call from John Arnold who wanted to
know who was working on getting an ISDA in place with a subsidiary of
Citibank. He thought it was a hedge fund, he wasn't sure.  He said that they
were getting very impatient to start dealing with us.  He left a contact for
Citibank:  Jerry Peskuchi (212) 723-7065, who wants to be updated on the
status of the master.

Sorry I didn't bring this up in the morning meeting, but please let me know
if any of you know anything about this, because I had no idea who to direct
his call to and could only promise to try and find the right person handling
this and pass the info on.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001
10:44 AM ---------------------------

Chris Meyer
03/20/2001 12:54 PM
To: Bryant Frihart/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Pikofsky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S
Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron,
Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael J Legler/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Western Frontier

This is one of the presentations at the Williams Customer trip Bryant and I
attended in KS.  It covers a proposed greenfield pipe known as Western
Frontier (Cheyne Hub to WIlliam Central's Hugoton (KS) station).

"Elliott, Mark" <Mark.D.Elliott@Williams.com> on 03/20/2001 10:26:23 AM
To: "'chris.meyer@enron.com'" <chris.meyer@enron.com>
cc: "Sanders, Dale T." <Dale.T.Sanders@Williams.com>, "King, Donny W (WGP
SouthCentral)" <Donny.W.King@Williams.com>
Subject: Western Frontier Presentation and Breakfast

 - 2001 WFP Presentation pdf version.pdf


Many thanks - will revert shortly.

Paul

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  GILBERGD@sullcrom.com                           25/01/2000 17:50

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, psimons@enron.co.uk
cc: PURVISM@sullcrom.com, RAISLERK@sullcrom.com (bcc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT)

Subject: Credit Derivatives/Confidentiality Policies and Procedures

Attached, as we discussed, are draft confidentiality policies and procedures
regarding credit derivatives, along with a draft letter to Reference
Entities.  Please call to discuss at your convenience.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - cdpro.wpd
 - cdltr.wpd


Let me know how it looks.

Thanks,
Robin


This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of Enron relating to the
performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, e-mail,
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow Enron to conduct an
investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box:

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs
P. O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman,s e-mail box:
Employees with Enron e-mail can access this box by sending an e-mail to the
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type &Office of the Chairman8 in the address
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and e-mail it to someone else,
the copy will not be anonymous.

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman voice
mail box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman voice mail box at (713)
853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line, your message
will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the voice mail box
while you are in the Enron voice mail system, your message will not be
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your letter
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acted
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 We take great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to work.  We
encourage each employee to continue to conduct Enron's business affairs in
accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.


John -

Attached please find the quote sheets for AK Steel:

Santiago and I are coming up now to discuss.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
Enron North America
Gas Structuring
713-345-4059


You are on the waitlist for the above class held Thursday and Friday (Nov. 1-2) from 8:00am-5:00pm both days.  I just received a cancellation.  Please respond ASAP to this email if you would like to be included in the class??

Thanks,
Maggie


I have made adjustments to the schedule concerning Nerc Training classes.
The class runs from 8 A.M. until 4 P.M.

Sample testing  can be done the following week at your own pace.

Please check the schedule at M:/electric/24hr/misc/schedule

Everyone should be o.k.

Thanks
Kayne


-----Original Message-----
From: Collins, Joan
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Schwieger, Jim
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

I don't know if you've read this one.  It kind of made me sick, to be honest!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Buehler, Craig
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:53 AM
To: Collins, Joan
Subject: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

  <http://ste.clickability.com/ste.gif?151|5180|4170|989|989|989|2577025|N|2|>
  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>
 	 Texas Monthly <http://www.texasmonthly.com>	   <http://images.clickability.com/logos/cc0000/emailthis-logo.gif>

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 You have received the following link from craig.buehler@enron.com:

  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>

 	 Click the following to access the sent link:

 	   <http://images.clickability.com/partners/989/etIcon.gif>Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1882864300>

 	 SAVE THIS link <http://texasmonthly.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=989&etMailToID=1882864300>	 FORWARD THIS link <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=1882864300&partnerID=989>

Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.

Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any Web site.	  <http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons>

	  <http://images.clickability.com/eti/spacer.gif>


Tana:
Can you tell me if any of the more recent ETA amendment letters that we have
sent out for execution refer to the new termination number?  My recollection
is that maybe only 1 or 2 did.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 11:51 AM -----

	David Forster@ENRON
	06/12/2000 09:23 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Terminations number

Carol,

It looks like we may have to change the Houston terminations phone number.
Can you tell me how many customers will be affected?

I will forward a new number once known (probably later this week). Will Tana
be handling the change notification?

Dave