Bridgeline was checking the issues on their side concerning payment directly to Dow.  We made it clear that we prefer they directly pay Dow.  They were supposed to get back with Brian later today.  Sorry I didn't make that clear earlier.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 12:48 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Redmond, Brian
Subject:	RE: Dow Invoice

We need to figure out how to play this out ASAP so that we know how much cash needs to be sent out.  My guess is that we would prefer to have Bridgeline pay Dow directly.  I have a voicemail from the guy at Dow and would like to get back with him on our plan.  Let me know.  Thanks.

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 12:24 PM
To:	Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	RE: Dow Invoice

Brian, Karen Gruesen, and I had a discussion this morning with Bridgeline.  We agreed that they owed and would pay the lease fees, but  the remainder of the charges were not subject to reimbursement.  The only issue was would they reimburse us or pay Dow directly.  They are concerned about netting issues.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zisman, Stuart
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Redmond, Brian; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	RE: Dow Invoice

Who keeps the books for Bridgeline?  In other words, how can we find out if they have paid their $1,000,000?  Please let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Gruesen, Karen
Cc:	Zisman, Stuart; Redmond, Brian
Subject:	Dow Invoice

I have reviewed the Dow Agreement wrt to the Dow Invoice Dated November 29, 2001 and have found the following

1.  2Q Lease Fee - $115,000
    3Q Lease Fee - $195,500.

Section 3.3 of the Agreement (as amended) provides for a lease fee of $25,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF until the date that gas injections begin in Enron's well (which was July 31, 2001) and a fee of $50,000 per BCF based on 4.6 BCF thereafter.  The fees are assessed per calendar quarter.  The above fees look to be OK.

2.  Final Mining Fee - $23,362.40
     Final Land Purchase Offset - ($47,013.75)

Section 6.5 through 6.8 of the Agreement provide for a detailed calculation of the Brine Fee due Dow based on the amount of salt removed from Enron's new well and a corresponding credit back to Enron for the conveyance of a 57.865 acres tract of land to Dow from Enron.  The credit is also based on the amount of Salt removed from Enron's new well.  Dow should provide detail on the salt removed and someone would need to go through the calcs in 6.5 through 6.8 to verify the above charges.

3.  Power Credit Adjustment - $16,500

I find no basis for this in the contract.

Under Schedule 3 to the Bridgeline Holdings, L.P. partnership agreement, Bridgline is obligated to bear all obligations under the Dow Agreement up to a maximum of $1,000,000 per year.  So Bridgeline should be paying these costs, assuming they haven't already paid up to $1,000,000.

Let me know if you have any questions.


Just a reminder.....West Mid Market QBR will be held this week:

  DATE:   FRIDAY, AUGUST 18, 2000
  TIME:   1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM
  PLACE:   EB3321

I will look forward to seeing you there.


Gerald,
	Just to be clear, this is the draft that Oakhill is reviewing and I expect to meet and have
	discussions later today or tomorrow.

	mk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Knippa, Mark
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:25 PM
To:	Timothy Vanakern (E-mail)
Cc:	Knippa, Mark
Subject:	OGS Pipeline LLP - Compression Service Agreement "Draft" 6/13/01
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

	Tim,
	Here is the "Draft" CSA that we discussed.  As I mentioned, I have taken some time and worked
	in the specifics to our transaction.   This is a Draft that I need you to review and make comments
	back to me.  Since yourself, John and your Alliant resource are in town Monday & Tuesday, I would
	like to establish a time that I can meet and walk through the agreement and discuss any specifics.
	This would probably be most productive after you have had the opportunity to review but before you
	spend a lot of time trying to work everything out.

	Either way, I'll make myself available Monday afternoon or Tuesday morning to meet.  Again, I want
	to re-enforce the need for us to get this document executed before the end of this month to take
	advantage of the equipment, installation and maintenance contract included in this Compression Service
	quote.  As always, the commodity pricing will need to be re-established at the time of our execution
	of the final CSA.

	There will also be a separate Maintenance Agreement whereby ECS will contract for all the maintenance
	services over the CSA's duration from the Start Date to the end of Term.  To ensure that we have no
	confusion, I'm assuming that Oakhill is providing day-to-day Operation of the facility the equipment and
	your system.  Our Services will cover the "Electrical Drive System" up to the shaft of the compressors
	and we will have an option for the term maintenance of the remaining equipment on these skids (compressors,
	cylinders, valves, dumps, pre-lube system, etc.)

	Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments between now and our meeting.  My office phone
	is 713-853-3463 and my cell phone is 713-851-7703.

	Thanks,
	Mark Knippa


you are so sweet to think of me.  i dont know why you would ever be in
houston, but if you are, we definitely need to get together.  talk to you
soon.


Robert sent me this - our friend Big Pete is running for State Rep and has his own webpage- funny!!!

http://www.petewrench.com/


Dear Investor,

I'm writing to expose the biggest lie in technology
today...

...one that has individual investors completely in the
dark about an opportunity of immense proportions.  A
LOW-RISK tech stock that can easily DOUBLE your money
by this time next year -- then make your fortune
several times over in the years to come.

I've just put the finishing touches on an Urgent
Profit Bulletin detailing this opportunity
and in just a bit, I'll tell you how to get your
FREE copy.

But first, back to technology's biggest lie.  I'm
talking about the so-called "glut" of fiber optic
cable.  Here's the REAL story:

WHEN the World Trade Center got hit, the Internet
slowed down -- very noticeably slowed down.  In fact,
it nearly came to a grinding halt!  That means there
isn't nearly enough capacity or redundancy built into
the system to accommodate a blip in demand.

Sources tell me that the government is very worried
about this problem.  After all, this is the second
time it's happened.  Back in July, a tunnel fire in
Baltimore slowed the Internet to a crawl for two full
days.

That means our communications systems -- and therefore
our economy -- are very, very vulnerable.

Ten years ago, it wouldn't have mattered.  But today,
commerce and security is COMPLETELY DEPENDENT on those
systems.  Virtually nothing moves without it.  That's
how banks and brokerages transfer funds...how
dispatchers route fleets of trucks...how many Americans
get paid through direct deposit.

And we are closer to the BREAKING POINT than 99.9% of
Americans even begin to understand.  Here's one
example.

Qwest -- one of America's biggest carriers -- recently
said they're 60% loaded on their network.  That
doesn't sound too bad...until you understand how these
networks operate.  You can't load a network much past
65%.  In fact, 70% is virtually CATASTROPHIC --
because the network spends so much time searching for
open channels, it doesn't spend any time actually
sending packets of information.

The system locks.  Communications stops.  The nation
comes to a standstill.

AMERICA IS FALLING BEHIND the rest of the developed
world.  Internet traffic systems currently run faster
in Australia, Europe and even South America.  That's
because we push out more data than everyone else --
but we're not increasing capacity at anywhere near the
needed rate.

We've got to catch up -- and we've got to catch up
fast!  Otherwise business, the economy and our
national security all go in the CRAPPER.

BUT WHY do we have this capacity problem amidst a
"fiber glut?"  Because  95% of all the fiber that has
ever been laid is "dark" -- that is, it's not
activated.  And the company I'm recommending is the #1
supplier of the components needed to do the job.  I'm
looking at a DOUBLE -- possibly a TRIPLE by this time
next year.  And I fully expect to multiply our money
five-times over by 2007.  In fact, this stock truly
has "ten-bagger" potential!

At the height of the boom, this company's stock was
nearly 20-times higher.  So what changed?  Spending on
communications networks dried up.  Now the government
is ready to pump $100 billion in emergency spending
into the economy; interest rates are practically zero;
and the need isn't just vital for the economy anymore
-- it's a question of NATIONAL SECURITY!

Please don't miss out.  You'll kick yourself big-time
if you miss out. Get this company's name -- and full
details -- in my urgent profit bulletin: 5-Times
Richer By 2007.  It's yours FREE, simply for accepting
a 100% RISK-FREE trial subscription to my TECHNOLOGY
INVESTING advisory.

TAKE a full six months to measure the value of my
advice for yourself.  Don't like what you see...don't
make the profits you want, just cancel, and your
subscription doesn't cost you a dime.   That's reason
enough to give it a try.  Because if I'm right -- and
I'm staking my reputation and my own money on this
call -- you can double your money, at least, in 12
months...and make your fortune several times over in the
coming years.

Please don't miss out.  Give yourself a chance.  At
least take a look at TECHNOLOGY INVESTING to see what
you think.  Our unusual six-month guarantee of total
satisfaction means my advisory costs you nothing if
you don't 100% approve.

Please click here to sign up now:
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0VN181

Sincerely,

Michael Murphy
TECHNOLOGY INVESTING

P.S.  The longer you wait, the more profits you MISS
OUT on.  This stock has a long ways to run -- but it's
already UP 43% since October 1st, in recognition of
this company's vital new role in national security.

Dark fiber does no good.  Actual carrying capacity is
strained to the limits.  And get this -- data traffic is
DOUBLING every year now.  That means a network
running at 63% of capacity needs to double its load by
this time next year just to keep up.  That's why the
fiber must be lit.  That's why the fiber will be lit.
Click here to take advantage of this opportunity now.
http://www.ppi-orders.com/index.htm?promo_code=0VN181

------------------------------------------------------

ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

We hope this free digest of investing advice is
valuable to you. If you'd like to change your e-mail
address (DON.BAUGHMAN@ENRON.COM), or unsubscribe, please
do so by going to the following address:

http://www.investorplace.com/unsubscribe.php

------------------------------------------------------

Sunday Nov 25, 2001 09:24:49


Mark, attached is a file regarding what the payment structures could look like. The plug is the total PV $'s that we will put towards the equation... other than that it is simply a demand charge calculation.

Pls coordinate and let me know.

BT


This request has been pending your approval for  84 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000058213&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000058213
Request Create Date : 9/5/01 1:07:01 PM
Requested For       : tammie.schoppe@enron.com
Resource Name       : Global Messaging North America Additional Mailbox Space (25 Meg Increase)
Resource Type       : Applications


Hello my darling.  It is great to hear from you.   The photo brought back
memories of a wonderful day with you. You are so beautiful.  I want to kiss
you all over.

Love

Rob


Janet,
 The amendment is effective as of June 1, 2001.  That is the date on which
the price changes and the date that the term is extended and the date the
meter number is added.  I have corrected the contract number on the first
line for the proper reference to the assigned contract.

	Janet H Wallis/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/17/2001 10:38 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: entex amendment attached for your review

Looks good....does it cover the  the pricing of $3.155 begins 6/01?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hyvl, Dan
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Wallis, Janet H.
Subject: entex amendment attached for your review

 << File: 2001-01amd.doc >>


Tina Rode
Assistant to Dave Duran
713-853-9582
Cell 713-419-6237

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crawford, Lynette
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Rode, Tina
Cc:	Cummings, David A.; Hill, Ben; Adamik, Darren
Subject:	RE: Recorded lines

Tina,

Please forward the requests for recordings  to Richard B. Sanders, VP and Assistant General Counsel.

Lynette

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rode, Tina
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Crawford, Lynette
Subject:	FW: Recorded lines

Lynette,

I sent this to Andrew and realized that he is out of the office.  Could you tell me who is handling these issues while he is out.

Tina Rode
Assistant to Dave Duran
713-853-9582
Cell 713-419-6237

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rode, Tina
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Edison, Andrew
Cc:	Rorschach, Reagan; Acevedo, Rudy; Braddock, Billy; Harvey, Claudette
Subject:	Recorded lines

Andrew,

I would like to set up recorded lines for:

Reagan Rorschach @ 6577; Rudy Acevedo @ 6578 & Billy Braddock @ 6579. They are currently using the Lucent phones.

Cost Center is 107446
Co:413

Thank you for your assistance.

Tina Rode
Assistant to Dave Duran
713-853-9582
Cell 713-419-6237


On Wall Street, people are talking about Enron.  At Enron, we're talking
about people...our people.  You are the driving force behind every success
that our company has experienced, including our high-performing stock price,
which surpassed the $50 mark only a few days ago. You made it happen!

To show our appreciation for your hard work and commitment to Enron,s
continued success, eligible regular full-time and regular part-time employees
who were on the payroll of a wholly-owned Enron company at Dec. 31, 1999 will
receive 50 Enron stock options.  A special stock option award certificate and
a copy of the stock plan will be sent to you in the next few weeks.

About the stock options grant:
? The grant was effective Jan. 18, 2000, therefore, the option grant price is
$55.50.
? Options will have a seven-year term, which means you must exercise these
options before seven years have passed.
? Options will vest 25 percent on Feb. 28, 2000 and 25 percent each
subsequent January 18th thereafter until fully vested, as long as you are an
employee of Enron.  This means you may exercise 25 percent of these options
as early as Feb. 28.
? This grant is made in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Enron
Corp. Stock Plans and the award documents, which you will receive in the
coming weeks.

Due to varying international restrictions and legalities, Enron employees in
certain international locations will receive some other form of recognition.
Your local management and human resources representative will communicate
further details.

Visit home.enron.com for additional information.  There you can access a list
of frequently asked questions regarding stock options.  And you can view a
special message from Ken Lay.  To access the special message, you must have
IP-TV and a sound card. If you are not able to view Ken,s message, a
transcript is available.  If you encounter any technical difficulties, please
contact your PC Help Desk.

Again, thank you for all you do to make Enron a successful global energy and
broadband services company and a great place to work.


Ok to sue

	Brenda McAfee@ENRON
	06/20/2000 11:46 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Bonnie White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Houston Pipe Line Company vs. Deer Park Rail Terminal, Inc.

Bonnie White has not received a response from  you on whether to go forward
with filing this suit on behalf of HPL against Deer Park Rail Terminal.
Could you please respond as soon as possible to this email (or directly to
Bonnie White) if you know of any reason why ENA should not go forward with
filing this suit.  Thank you very much for your quick response.    Bonnie
White 713/853-7244

----- Forwarded by Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000 11:41 AM -----

	Gay Arnold
	06/16/2000 12:14 PM

		 To: John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Al Alexanderson/Enron, Steve
Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Adam Umanoff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rwillia2@ect.enron.com, Jim
Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, (bcc: Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron)
		 Subject: Houston Pipe Line Company vs. Deer Park Rail Terminal, Inc.

Please see attached letter for your immediate response.


REMINDER:

Thursday, April 26, is the deadline to sign up for 1-unit courses here in
the Evening MBA office (not Telebears).

If you cannot come in, please call (510) 642-1406 and we'll sign your name
to the list (Speaking for Management, Diversity Management, Non-Profit
Boards).

Thanks!
TJ


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 03:36 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/24/2001 04:55 PM

		 To: pamela.coleman@gs.com
		 cc: nikki.kroll@gs.com, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Pamela:

Please call or email regarding the account assignment.  If you are not the
right person, please forward the request and advise.  We are anxious to have
this executed.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 04:52 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/22/2001 10:31 AM

		 To: pamela.coleman@gs.com
		 cc: nikki.kroll@gs.com
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Pamela:

I am also sending you the attached message which I just sent to Nikki Kroll.
Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 10:30 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/22/2001 10:27 AM

		 To: nikki.kroll@gs.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Nikki:

I am a lawyer with ENA.  I understand that you have been involved with the
execution of the Goldman Sachs & Co. ("GSC")/ECI Corporate Account Agreement,
working with both Cheryl Nelson and Stephanie Panus of ENA.

ENA would like to transfer several accounts to ECI.  In connection therewith,
I am attaching a form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement for that
purpose.  This document is based upon a similar agreement executed by GSC,
ENA and ECT Investments, Inc. on January 22, 2001.

I ask that you please advise me of the following:

(1)  What is the effective date of the Corporate Account Agreement between
ECI and GSC?  Has it been executed by GSC?

(2)  Is the attached form of assignment acceptable?

(3)  Is there anybody else with GSC that needs to be involved with the
review/execution of the attached assignment?

Please let me hear from you.  Our commercial group is extremely anxious to
effectuate the transfer.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Hi Dale & Vince,

For your benefit I have compiled a shortlist of the main projects worked on
over the past five months:

1) Inflation curve modelling (February and March)
2) UK Power Monthly Vol Curve generator
3) Nordic Power Monthly Vol Curve generator
4) Energydesk.com models & support
5) Compound options for UK Power desk (options to build power stations)
6) Continental power non-generic options (using arbitrary trader-specified
distributions)
7) Global products: non-generic options modelling and new commodity forward
curve construction (benzene fwd curve from naphtha)
8) Exotic options library upgrade/model test/bug fixes (e.g. testing new/old
Asian models)
9) Continental gas volatility curve construction

The best summary for this is in the attached presentation that I gave to the
London and Oslo staff recently.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383

Presentation Attached:


Brian and Jim:

Regarding the HPL / AEP deal - at the time of closing property taxes will be prorated for the number of days each company will have owned the property during the 2001 calendar year.

If we assume a June 1 closing date, HPl's share of the 2001 property taxes paid in January 2002 will be approximately 41% based on an ownership period of 151 days out of 365.  This tax proration will, in all probability, be based on amounts paid for the 2000 year.  As far as who pays these taxes in January '02, we feel it will be AEP.

Finally, once all the taxes have been paid for 2001 a reconciliation will be made between the two companies based on the proration in effect at the time of closing.

If you have any questions, please call me at X-30689.

Warren


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf

Jan WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clf-qof.pdf
Jan Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Jan Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Dec/May Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoz-hok.pdf
Jan/Feb Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hof-hog.pdf
Dec Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-hoz.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
Dec/Mar Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/huz-huh.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf


Jeff , thanks.  I am using this stuff on Monday and Tuesday when we see
people in Finance and Energy here.  Here is my own contribution to the
discussion - something I wrote a few months ago and recently revised.


Richard, have you been involved in this?  Robert Knight asked about it.
Thanks a lot.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------
From: Robert Knight on 01/12/2000 02:52 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tape Retention Policy

Michelle,

Have you had a chance to work on the policy letter?  We are running out of
storage space in our safe and need to destroy old tapes.

Thanks,  Robert

To: Darren P Adamik/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tape Retention Policy

I have asked Michelle Cash in legal to provide a new policy letter.  I think
they are going to change to 4 months.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Darren P Adamik                           07/08/99 04:59 PM

To: Robert Knight/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tape Retention Policy

This is what I want to send to Lucy, so we start the deletion process on our
DAT tapes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------

Lucy, It is Enron's Retention Policy that all audio tapes be destroyed that
are older than six months.  This policy was lifted when the East Power
Marketers had a brief inflation of electricity pricing during the summer
months of 1998.  That retention policy is now back into affect and therefore,
all audio tapes older than six months at the start of each month will be
physically destroyed.

I understand that there is some litigation going on because of the price
inflation during that time frame, so I need to know what time period we
should keep until all litigations are completed.

Please respond back as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Darren Adamik


Clean Air/NOx Briefing for ENA:  On Monday 8/28, Environmental Strategies
held a detailed briefing on Clean Air/NOx regulations for the ENA East Power
Desk, which resulted in several ongoing projects.   Over 40 people, including
Kevin Presto (head of trading), almost all the traders, all analysts, and all
fundimentals (IT, information) staff were in attendance.    Mary Schoen
pulled the presentation together and addressed financial impacts of the
regulations on power markets. Jeff Keeler gave background, history, and
future timelines regarding NOx and other air regulation.   Gus Egnheim and
Marc Phillips  assisted with technical questions related to control
technologies.   The meeting  concluded with a discussion of strategy going
forward, and a project to assist ENA in a detailed analysis of the effects on
power plants and markets in the NOx SIP Call states.   Kevin Presto (who is
also responsible for running the peakers) indicated that it may be more
preferable to sacrifice some of our peaker interests and develop a strategy
that supports state and EPA efforts that increase costs as much as possible
on our competitors.   This will be an ongoing strategic effort  to add value
to ENA.

   Texas Renewable Energy Credit Comments:  Enron led a group of companies
that generate, trade and market renewable energy and environmental advocates
in filing joint comments on issues related to the implementation of a
Renewable Energy Credit ("REC") trading program in Texas.  Stacey Bolton  led
drafting efforts on behalf of the group, and worked within Enron to
coordinate our positions.  The program is consistent with positions we've
taken, in that attributes of energy can be traded separately from its energy
source.    The group recommended changes that would lead to consistency and
adaptability, including comments about what information should be included on
the credit's "label" and a recommendation that any environmental disclosure
requirements be developed in conjunction with the REC trading protocol.

Pipeline Safety:   We continue to monitor the legislative climate following
the tragic El Paso pipeline eruption and fire in Carlsbad, NM, in which 10
people were killed.    While the widely-held perception among industry is
that the accident will have a negative effect on the legislation, information
from Capitol Hill continues to indicate that the legislation will not likely
become more burdensome -- there is just a greater likelihood that it will
receive attention and an effort will be made to pass something this
Congress.   It is expected that the full Senate may act in the two weeks
after Labor Day weekend, but that the House still may not be ready to move
legislation through committee and to the House floor until later in
September.  INGAA is recommending hiring an outside lobbying firm to assist
in efforts going forward, due to the thought that many companies will not
want to be active or visible in lobbying this issue because of the El Paso
accident.  Jeff  Keeler will investigate the climate on Capitol Hill further
before Enron signs off on this strategy.   In addition, Stan Horton will be
in DC the week of 9/5 to attend meetings at DOE and Dept. of Treasury, to
talk about the possible impacts of the accident on energy markets and the
economy.

In addition to advising GPG, we have been providing information and analysis
to ENA Competitive Analysis, who is advising ENA management on the effects of
this legislation on gas and power markets, so that we may take advantage of
opportunities that arise.

 Climate Change:   Jeff  Keeler has been providing information on various
climate change proposals to Enron South America, who will be engaging in a
dialogue with Brazilian environmental regulators over Enron's involvement or
interest in Joint Implementation and Emissions Trading programs.

Georgia NOx SIP Regulations - Marc Phillips attended a meeting with the
Georgia Environmental Protection Division regarding their development of
non-attainment NOx transport rules in Georgia to gather environmental
intelligence for ENA/EES project development.

Houston Non-Attainment regulations - Marc Phillips is attending a meeting
with other pipeline companies to discuss preparing industry comments
regarding the proposed Houston non-attainment regulations and the emission
limits on reciprocating engines that could have a $30 - 40 MM impact on GPG
operations over a three year period.

Enron Ergonomic CBT -  Russell Tucker received and approved the release
candidate short version of the Office Ergonomics CBT CD-ROM and should have
final copies from manufacturing for the 20 administrative level employee
workstation egronomic pilot testing during the first week of September 2000.

API Task Force Review For ANSI Z365 Vote - Russell Tucker has reviewed the
extensive changes made by the Accredited Standards Committee  for the Z365,
"Control of Cumulative Trauma Disorders" proposed ANSI consensus standard as
a member of the API Task Force deciding the issues.   Russ submitted comments
directly to the Committee on behalf of Enron.

International Emergency Response Contractors - Completed the list of
emergency responders.  Report submitted to Mike Terraso on August 31.  A
meeting with Don Hawkins GPG, serving as Corp Emergency Response
coordinator, will be scheduled for next week to present the list and discuss
next steps.

EHS Indirect Report Staff Meeting - Mike Terraso met with the  EHS management
indirect reports ,environmental legal and conferencing in with Jeff Keeler in
Washington, NEPCO in Seatle.  The meeting reviewed 2000 objectives status;
current federal legislative issues and  shared cross company information.

EES/OEC Federal Services -  Mike Terraso, Henry Van and Susan Worthen met
with Don Hawkins to review EHS asset support services for EES/OEC federal
services.

Friends of Earth - Mike Terraso, Kelly Kimberly and Lauren Goldblatt  are
meeting with FOE in Washington on Friday to initiate stakeholder dialogue on
biodiversity  in response to FOE proxy statement at last the  Enron
shareholder meeting.  Other NGO's attending Conservation International, World
Wildlife Fund, World Resources International.

Contractor Safety Awareness Program - Corp EHS (S.Watson, H. Van, M. Terraso)
in cooperation with Bill Donovan's group conducted initial building
contractor safety awareness program for contractors performing demolition/
buildouts in the Enron Building.

Earth Day 2001 - at the request of Cindy Olsen, Mike Terraso met with Missy
Stevens (community relations) to review Enron Earth Day 2001 initiatives.

GHP - Business Council for Clean Air - Mike Terraso participated in review of
a clean air technology verification proposal presented to Greater Houston
Partnership Business Council for Clean Air.  The program would substitute
emission reductions gained through accepted technology to lessen the impact
on mobile and stationary air emission sources in the eight county Houston
non-attainment area. The project would be performed in time for a mid-course
correction of the Texas SIP.

Texas Nature Conservancy - M. Terraso and John Shafer (GPG VP EHS)  met with
Robert Potts, Texas Nature Conservancy director and Nigel Homer, National
Nature Conservancy to review potential cooperative employee educational and
community service activities programs for Enron.

 Clean Air/NOx Briefing for ENA:  On Monday 8/28, Environmental Strategies
held a detailed briefing on Clean Air/NOx regulations for the ENA East Power
Desk, which resulted in several ongoing projects.   Over 40 people, including
Kevin Presto (head of trading), almost all the traders, all analysts, and all
fundimentals (IT, information) staff were in attendance.    Mary Schoen
pulled the presentation together and addressed financial impacts of the
regulations on power markets. Jeff Keeler gave background, history, and
future timelines regarding NOx and other air regulation.   Gus Egnheim and
Marc Phillips  assisted with technical questions related to control
technologies.   The meeting  concluded with a discussion of strategy going
forward, and a project to assist ENA in a detailed analysis of the effects on
power plants and markets in the NOx SIP Call states.   Kevin Presto (who is
also responsible for running the peakers) indicated that it may be more
preferable to sacrifice some of our peaker interests and develop a strategy
that supports state and EPA efforts that increase costs as much as possible
on our competitors.   This will be an ongoing strategic effort  to add value
to ENA.

   Texas Renewable Energy Credit Comments:  Enron led a group of companies
that generate, trade and market renewable energy and environmental advocates
in filing joint comments on issues related to the implementation of a
Renewable Energy Credit ("REC") trading program in Texas.  Stacey Bolton  led
drafting efforts on behalf of the group, and worked within Enron to
coordinate our positions.  The program is consistent with positions we've
taken, in that attributes of energy can be traded separately from its energy
source.    The group recommended changes that would lead to consistency and
adaptability, including comments about what information should be included on
the credit's "label" and a recommendation that any environmental disclosure
requirements be developed in conjunction with the REC trading protocol.

Pipeline Safety:   We continue to monitor the legislative climate following
the tragic El Paso pipeline eruption and fire in Carlsbad, NM, in which 10
people were killed.    While the widely-held perception among industry is
that the accident will have a negative effect on the legislation, information
from Capitol Hill continues to indicate that the legislation will not likely
become more burdensome -- there is just a greater likelihood that it will
receive attention and an effort will be made to pass something this
Congress.   It is expected that the full Senate may act in the two weeks
after Labor Day weekend, but that the House still may not be ready to move
legislation through committee and to the House floor until later in
September.  INGAA is recommending hiring an outside lobbying firm to assist
in efforts going forward, due to the thought that many companies will not
want to be active or visible in lobbying this issue because of the El Paso
accident.  Jeff  Keeler will investigate the climate on Capitol Hill further
before Enron signs off on this strategy.   In addition, Stan Horton will be
in DC the week of 9/5 to attend meetings at DOE and Dept. of Treasury, to
talk about the possible impacts of the accident on energy markets and the
economy.

In addition to advising GPG, we have been providing information and analysis
to ENA Competitive Analysis, who is advising ENA management on the effects of
this legislation on gas and power markets, so that we may take advantage of
opportunities that arise.

 Climate Change:   Jeff  Keeler has been providing information on various
climate change proposals to Enron South America, who will be engaging in a
dialogue with Brazilian environmental regulators over Enron's involvement or
interest in Joint Implementation and Emissions Trading programs.

Georgia NOx SIP Regulations - Marc Phillips attended a meeting with the
Georgia Environmental Protection Division regarding their development of
non-attainment NOx transport rules in Georgia to gather environmental
intelligence for ENA/EES project development.

Houston Non-Attainment regulations - Marc Phillips is attending a meeting
with other pipeline companies to discuss preparing industry comments
regarding the proposed Houston non-attainment regulations and the emission
limits on reciprocating engines that could have a $30 - 40 MM impact on GPG
operations over a three year period.

Enron Ergonomic CBT -  Russell Tucker received and approved the release
candidate short version of the Office Ergonomics CBT CD-ROM and should have
final copies from manufacturing for the 20 administrative level employee
workstation egronomic pilot testing during the first week of September 2000.

API Task Force Review For ANSI Z365 Vote - Russell Tucker has reviewed the
extensive changes made by the Accredited Standards Committee  for the Z365,
"Control of Cumulative Trauma Disorders" proposed ANSI consensus standard as
a member of the API Task Force deciding the issues.   Russ submitted comments
directly to the Committee on behalf of Enron.

International Emergency Response Contractors - Completed the list of
emergency responders.  Report submitted to Mike Terraso on August 31.  A
meeting with Don Hawkins GPG, serving as Corp Emergency Response
coordinator, will be scheduled for next week to present the list and discuss
next steps.

EHS Indirect Report Staff Meeting - Mike Terraso met with the  EHS management
indirect reports ,environmental legal and conferencing in with Jeff Keeler in
Washington, NEPCO in Seatle.  The meeting reviewed 2000 objectives status;
current federal legislative issues and  shared cross company information.

EES/OEC Federal Services -  Mike Terraso, Henry Van and Susan Worthen met
with Don Hawkins to review EHS asset support services for EES/OEC federal
services.

Friends of Earth - Mike Terraso, Kelly Kimberly and Lauren Goldblatt  are
meeting with FOE in Washington on Friday to initiate stakeholder dialogue on
biodiversity  in response to FOE proxy statement at last the  Enron
shareholder meeting.  Other NGO's attending Conservation International, World
Wildlife Fund, World Resources International.

Contractor Safety Awareness Program - Corp EHS (S.Watson, H. Van, M. Terraso)
in cooperation with Bill Donovan's group conducted initial building
contractor safety awareness program for contractors performing demolition/
buildouts in the Enron Building.

Earth Day 2001 - at the request of Cindy Olsen, Mike Terraso met with Missy
Stevens (community relations) to review Enron Earth Day 2001 initiatives.

GHP - Business Council for Clean Air - Mike Terraso participated in review of
a clean air technology verification proposal presented to Greater Houston
Partnership Business Council for Clean Air.  The program would substitute
emission reductions gained through accepted technology to lessen the impact
on mobile and stationary air emission sources in the eight county Houston
non-attainment area. The project would be performed in time for a mid-course
correction of the Texas SIP.

Texas Nature Conservancy - M. Terraso and John Shafer (GPG VP EHS)  met with
Robert Potts, Texas Nature Conservancy director and Nigel Homer, National
Nature Conservancy to review potential cooperative employee educational and
community service activities programs for Enron.

Cuiaba II - Joe Kolb was not able to participate in the conference call this
week.  Mid-September is key date after which work on the compressor stations
is expected to begin in earnest.

Cuiaba Pipeline - Joe Kolb is trying to contact David Runte to verify
information in the monthly report and is currently planning a trip to Bolivia
with Edgar Zuleta to inspect and review project-related issues first hand.

Construction BMPs - Bob Moss has not heard received any comments from Jerry
Martin or his staff.  Regarding the fiber optic component of the BMPs, Joe
Kolb has not been able to discuss the project with Herb Caballero.   Bill
Osborne has distributed the pipeline BMPs to Shafer, Ryther, and Steenberg
for their comments.  He hopes to get their feedback this week and then take
it on to others within GPG.

Greenfield Risk Mangement Project - Documents that lay out sequence of
environmental aspects of major capital project development are nearly
complete.  The one for GPG is being reviewed by Bill Osborne.

Recycling Committee -  Wayne Lei has sent info on PGE's recycling program,
which Joe Kolb provided to David  Ronkainen.  Joe Kolb conducted an informal
small energy conservation survey on 3AC 15 and found that 53% of the 36
office credenza lights and 35% of the 110 cubicle lights were left burning,
plus 3 computers, 1 radio and 1 fan.  If we decide to promote energy
conservation in our downtown offices, the impact should be something that can
be estimated by doing before and after surveys on a few floors.

Isagen Privatization, Colombia - Don Stevens provided an environmental due
diligence scope of work to Mario Brunasso, Development Engineering, who will
forward it to a local engineering consulting firm.  Due to high security
risk, Enron has elected to hire Harza for the full scope of the due
diligence.  The privatization includes hydro and thermal generation and
transmission, accounting for over 30% of Colombia's energy supply.

Project Dragon, Asia - The Environmental Schedule of the Share Purchase
Agreement was circulated for review by Bruce Lundstrom, APAChi Legal.  Copies
were forwarded to Frank Smith for comment.  The lenders have begun their due
diligence in Hong Kong and key discipline leaders are on standby to answer
questions.  A TransitionsTeam may be deployed in October/November.  This deal
is still very confidential and Enron Asia power plants and personnel do not
know anything.

ENEL, Nicaragua - Don Stevens has requested Ramiro Garcia to review proposed
legislation for Nicaragua to assist in the evaluation of its potential
impact.  The proposal is very stringent and does not have much chance of
success; however, Enron has learned some of the other bidders are addressing
capital costs associated with the potential requirements.  The bid date is
October 12.

Annual Report - Many technical and management problems have plagued the Image
Center's pdf of the Annual Report.  Gavin Dillingham succeeded in the posting
and publication of the final edition.  Hard copies will likely be ready next
Friday for distribution to Executive Staff.

Valuation Exercise - Susan, Henry, Jeff, and Marc all provided input on the
EHS value to Enron exercise.  An additional meeting was held with Gia to
explain some of the tasks.

EES/Eli Lilly Deal - Susan Worthen participated in several meetings with both
EES and Eli Lilly to learn more about the scope of services and EES' EHS
management system.  A more detailed meeting with EES's Enron Building
Services Inc. group will be held next week.  An EHS briefing has been
scheduled for September 13 to answer Eli Lilly's environmental due diligence
questions.


Hi Scott,

I have some questions:

The obligation to try to improve performance  about the specific performance
(ie minimum) standards frequently has a time limit, say 6 months.  Do you
have a sense for the appropriate time period here?  Would it make sense to
require them to work longer on the first 2.0 and 2.4 than the rest?

Will we have a drawing number for a standard foundation design, or will we
need to put words around it.  I know we discussed the need for pilings as the
most significant change.  Do you think that this difference is enough?  Did I
understand that we want them to pay us at the end for non-standard
foundations (as opposed to a credit).

On termination, are we going with the average value no matter what the reason
for termination, with a rep along the lines of whay you wrote, plus some
monitoring ability.

On assignment, they mentioned a corporate guaranty.  I was thinking of using
something broader due to various financing/balance sheet considerations,
perhaps tying it to a guaranty from a BBB rated entity.

Do we want an option to have them store these, which would then impact
payment?

Thanks,

Kay


Small stuff is staggerd Choice Capacity from LDC, no problem. 10,000 and 8,000
packages appear to be winter supplies for C&I. As long as ENA buys monthly
capacity for C&I market that extra Choice capacity can't cover, we should be
OK.

Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 03/15/2000 12:37:50 AM
Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com

To: Chris.Germany@enron.com, Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Capacity Expires

Jeff- Joann sent me this note showing CES capacity that expires 3/31/2000.
Except for the SST, it differs from what we discussed this week.
Please Review.
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron North America Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Joann Collins
 pic14068.pcx) 03/15/2000 10:38 AM

To:   Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  just FYI

 (Embedded
 image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic22645.pcx)
 to file:
 pic22245.pcx)

K#        Type      Market    Expiration Date           Volume    Comments
63281          SST       coh(various)         3/31/2000      134,710
 As discussed
62978          FTS       cpa8            3/31/2000      8000
63282          FTS       cgv10                3/31/2000      6
63283          FTS       cmd4&8          3/31/2000      46
63764          FTS       cpa8            3/31/2000      10000
65458          SST       coh3            3/31/2000      33

These contracts were term contracts since 10/1/99.

thanks
joann

 - pic14068.pcx
 - pic22245.pcx
 - pic22645.pcx


Start Date: 10/24/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102406.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Yeah.  Ask me how happy I am to be back at work, with a midterm in finance tomorrow nite. Sigh...

Tried to call you guys yesterday to see if you wanted to stop by your folks to have abalone, but only got your voicemail.  I'm sure you were glad just to get home and relax.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:

I thought the whole weekend was a total blast.  It was great having both of
you there!!  I think every one had a very good time. There is no possible
way that we could have done anything more in one weekend.  Pumpkin carving,
abalone, piano roles, bluegrass, good meals, monopoly, scrabble and then the
most incredible weather I have ever had up there!!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	cameron@perfect.com
Subject:

It was really fun.  Thanks so much for inviting us.  It was great to get
to play together.  I'll get Scott a check for our share of the goodies.
Thanks again.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I think ultimately this is likely a case of an insurance company not wanting
to reasonably analyze the claim as regards Chris' point below.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Booth @ ENRON                           05/17/2001 04:49 PM

To: James P Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, James L Bouillion/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew
Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: SWPC 501D5A Generator Damager onboard M/V: INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE

Jim,

I would suggest that we arrange for another inspection of the generator at
the Westinghouse facility here in Houston.  I would suggest that Westinghouse
bring additional experts and would also suggest that the insurance company
send an additional surveyor.  I firmly believe that Mr Newell does not
appreciate complexity and of the generator and all the electrical properties
of the insulation system and he is not going to change his mind.

I will defer to Ben for final direction.

Chris

From: James P Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/17/2001 04:15 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James L Bouillion/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, James P
Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: SWPC 501D5A Generator Damager onboard M/V:  INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE

Have just talked with adjuster again, and she has preliminary verbal report
from surveyor who says that drawings merely confirm his prior contention that
this generator was NOT a total loss at the time of the loss, but that further
inspection of the unit would be necessary to prove otherwise.

The comments from Andrew Edison about pressing SWPC on their responsibilities
and ownership of the unit, this has previously been expressed by the adjuster
to Jim Bouillion.  She definitely would like to have a sit down meeting with
Enron people only, not SWPC at this time,  to discuss options and where we go
from here.  She still hasn't signed the CA, but that is not necessary as she
is not looking at the drawings and looking at them by her is not necessary
for the purpose of a meeting with Enron.

I did not check her availability for a meeting at this time because my
schedule for Mon-Tues is still up in the air, and Jim Bouillion has a Mon-Wed
meeting with our captive insurer in Vermont and would not be available before
Thursday.  Do we collectively want to go forward with the sit down meeting
with the adjuster, and if yes, who all needs to be involved and what are
their availabilities?

Concerning the VALUE of the generator, the declared value of the entire
shipment was $24,506,000.  There is no breakdown on the paperwork I have (or
the broker) that puts a separate value on just the generator.  Thus I guess
someone either has that or SWPC can provide that information.  The policy is
not a "replacement cost value"  policy nor an "actual cash value" policy, but
a "valued" policy.  What that means is we get paid what ever we declared the
value to be CIF + 10%.  Hence the need to know what part of the $24,506,000
is the "value" of the generator.

I await further instructions as to how you want to proceed.


Friday, December 8, 2000

Dear Subscriber,

Travelocity.com fare watcher found 4 recent fare change(s) based on
your current round-trip selections. If the fares have
gone down in price, we recommend you act quickly to take
advantage of time-sensitive low fares.

To find one of the fares below, point your web browser
to your Personal Fare Watcher Page in Travelocity.com. To do
so, click on the following URL link, or copy and paste
the URL into your browser.

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=00090710459823|TRAVELOCITY

========   FARES      ============================

*  QHO-PDX   FROM: HOUSTON ALL AIRPORTS (QHO)
             TO:   PORTLAND, OR (PDX)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $198.00      $198.00     -$0.00

*  QHO-BOS   FROM: HOUSTON ALL AIRPORTS (QHO)
             TO:   BOSTON, MA (BOS)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $228.00      $198.00     +$30.00

*  QHO-SAF   FROM: HOUSTON ALL AIRPORTS (QHO)
             TO:   SANTA FE, NM (SAF)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $268.00      $268.00     -$0.00

*  QHO-LON   FROM: HOUSTON ALL AIRPORTS (QHO)
             TO:   LONDON ALL AIRPORTS (LON)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE      WAS      DIFFERENCE
             ---------    -------    ----------
             $468.00      $468.00     -$0.00

Prices DO NOT INCLUDE applicable tax and fees (Tax
and fees on international fares may be higher).

All fares are quoted in U.S. dollars.

************NEW************
Go places you've never dreamed possible!  Introducing Dream Maps from
Travelocity.com.  Tell us where you are and what you want to spend and
we'll tell you where you can go.  Your budget may be limited but not
your possibilities! Check out Dream Maps on Travelocity.com.  Go
Virtually Anywhere.  http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/dreamMap.ctl
*****************************

========  Travelocity Value Rates  ==================

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:

PORTLAND, OR (PDX) starting at just $85
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=PDX&rate_cat=V

BOSTON, MA (BOS) starting at just $79
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=BOS&rate_cat=V

SANTA FE, NM (SAF) starting at just $69
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=SAF&rate_cat=V

LONDON ALL AIRPORTS (LON) starting at just $79
Click:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=LON&rate_cat=V

========   TRAVELOCITY.COM TIP     ===================

Find these and other low fares fast using Best Fare Finder.
Just follow the link above to your personal Fare Watcher
page, select your destination city and airline, and we will
display a calendar highlighting the dates that fare is
offered.  It is just that simple!

========   OF SPECIAL INTEREST   ======================

Explore exotic destinations and discover intriguing travel information
and special deals.  Don't miss one issue of Travelocity
Magazine--subscribe now!
http://www.travelocity.com/magazine/subscribe/

========   MAKING RESERVATIONS  ==================

* FOR ONLINE RESERVATIONS -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognlogin.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* TO CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

* TO RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD -

http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY

IMPORTANT:
 1.  All published fares are for one adult, round-
trip, between your selected cities. Seats are subject
to availability and other restrictions may apply.
ALWAYS READ THE FARE RULES!

 2.  Fares shown to the US and Canada do not include
a $2 federal excise tax which will be imposed on each
flight segment of your itinerary.


Please find supporting documents.

Thank you.
Jane Chen
Assistant to Gary S. Fergus
(415) 979-2944

Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF
MPA 4 TRO.PDF
 <<Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF>>  <<MPA 4 TRO.PDF>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Notice of Motion 4 TRO.PDF
 - MPA 4 TRO.PDF


A meeting was held with the Eunice Team to assign roles and responsibilities
for the newly issued Title V air permit for the NNG Eunice C/S.  The permit
is similiar to the other title V permits issued to New Mexico faciliites.

Assisted the Gallup Team with the preparation, completion and submittal of
the Title V semi anual compliance monitoring report and annual certification
report.

The state of New Mexico Air Quality Bureau conducted an inspection of the
Wt-1 C/S.  This inspection is interesting in the fact that all combustion
equipment has been removed and dismantled and replaced by electric units.
Written notification was submitted to the agency several months ago and a
written reply was received from the agency that the facility is exempt from
any and all permitting requirements.

A meeting was held with the Artesia Team to assign roles and responsibilities
for the newly issued Title V air permit for the Atoka No. 3 C/S.  Also
discussed was the permitting approach which will be followed for the approval
to install micro pre combustion chambers on two White units which were found
to be out of compliance with the air permit emissions limits when the New
Mexico Air Quality Bureau conducted a surprise inspection at the facility.


Kay,  Please see attached.  Thanks.


Darrell and John, could you two be sure we discuss this afternoon.  I am having
	to work on reviews and will not be able to attend the meeting.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 7:08 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Hanagriff, Richard
Cc:	January, Steve; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

I don't think that decision has been made.  I think we should be allocating.  This should be discussed today at
the TW afternoon marketing meeting.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 7:04 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	FW: Devon SFS

	I'm confused?  Are we allocating at this time to be sure the imbalance does not
	grow any more?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

that would be one of our options if they don't cash out the balance as of 12/31/01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:53 PM
To:	Hanagriff, Richard; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

	If I understand correctly, the scheduled volume is continually higher than the flow?  Why don't
	we allocate this point to minimize the imbalance?  Just a thought?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:39 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	Devon SFS

Who is the marketer assigned to Devon SFS Operating?

Devon owed TW $161,292.49 as of 12/31/01 related to oba contract 21749.  There is one point on this contract(Bilbrey 28 Fed 1) which flows about 500 mmbtu per day.  Devon is currently having problems delivering gas into TW which is increasing the imbalance further.

Devon has told Amy that they will possibly cash out but they haven't made a commitment yet.  If Devon doesn't cash out and they do not lower nominations on this point, then we will have to explore other options to get this gas/$$$$.

Amy will continue to follow up with Devon and pursue cashing out.

thanks
Richard


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/05/2001 06:01 PM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: energy humor

Apparently I forgot to attach the material referred to in this morning's
email. ?My dumb mistake -- daniel----------From: Daniel Casse
<dcasse@whwg.com>Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:19:00 -0600To: <skean@enron.com>
Cc: <rshapiro@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>Subject: energy humorSteve --
here is a first crack at some humor based on this week's news from
California.At the end is an idea for a cartoon. ?I thought I should run it by
you before we get our cartoonist working on it.I'm in New York today and
probably will check my email late in the day. ?But I will be checking my
voicemail regularly.Daniel-- Daniel CasseWhite House Writers
Group615-297-5999615-297-5908 (fax)
 - EnergyHumorJan5.DOC
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/10/2001 01:27 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: jan 9 enron humor

Steve --

here is another installment on the continuing California story.  There is
another cartoon idea here.  I am ready to get our cartoonist rolling, but
let me know if you like this or the previous idea.

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - Jan9humor.DOC
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/12/2001 11:26 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Energy crisis material

here are a few more items

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - Jan12humor.DOC
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/16/2001 03:27 PM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Jan 16 humor

Attached is some more humor based on California events

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - January16humor.DOC
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/23/2001 01:56 PM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Humor

Observations on the California Electricity Crisis
White House Writers Group
January 23, 2001

Will the last business to leave California please turn out the lights.
Oh wait, they?re already out.

California Governor Gray Davis may ultimately prove responsible for the
dimming of more lights than Frank Sinatra music.

California has done for energy deregulation what Florida has done for
elections.

California Governor Gray Davis says he?ll appoint a "power plant czar" to
help solve the state?s energy crisis.  There must be a sign on his desk
saying, "The buck stops here?just long enough for me to pass it to someone
else."

During the current energy crisis in California, the spotlight shines on
Governor Gray Davis?so long as it?s not knocked out by rolling blackouts,
that is.

Gray Davis was shocked when told about the "doomsday scenario."  Not the one
from Pacific Gas & Electric which envisions California power blackouts
lasting 12 hours a day, the one from his aides saying he might lose the
governor?s race in 2002.

California politicians have learned what thieves have known for a longtime.
It?s easier to pick someone?s pocket in the dark.

California is talking conservation.  One good conservation measure would be
for Governor Gray Davis to save his breath trying to convince people that
government control is the answer to the energy crisis.

Possible Jingle Themes for Gray Davis Re-election Bid:

My Hopes Were High 'til the Lights Went Low

Brother, Can You Spare a Megawatt?

There's Dark at the End of the Tunnel

Return Me to Power (Even if You Don't Have Any)

Top 10 Reasons to Not Have California Government Electricity

10:  Would create yet another oxymoron.

9:  Electricity might go to wrong address the way mail does.

8:  Promise of efficient electricity gives politicians one more thing to lie
about.

7:  Power keeps going off when Rush Limbaugh comes on air.

6:  Light bulbs would match politicians for dimness.

5:  Special tax on flashlights.

4:  Fifteen day waiting period to use microwave.

3:  Rolling blackouts joined by rolling the taxpayers.

2:  Consumer manual on government-mandated way to change a light bulb runs
25,000 pages.

1:  Nine words: From the same people who gave you the DMV.

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/31/2001 09:39 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Energy Crisi Humor

Observations on the California Energy Crisis
The White House Writers Group
January 31st

Gray Davis has announced that he will soon announce two energy czars to lead
the state through the current crisis.  Logical candidates include: Laurel and
Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Beavis and Butthead, and Siegfried and Roy.

The environmentalist Green Party is well-named.  Thanks to its role in
blocking construction of new power plants, Californians are forking over
plenty of green for energy.

California?s power industry is very Kennedyesque.  Their message to consumers
is, "Ask not what your energy company can do for you; ask what you can do for
your energy company."

Congress might get involved in California?s energy crisis.  There?s nothing a
drowning victim needs more than having an anchor thrown to him.

It?s one thing for California politicians trying to solve the energy problem
to go back to the drawing board, but do they have to ask taxpayers to buy
them a new one?

In California, lawmakers are now getting down to details.  The latest debate
involves what to name the bonds the state will issue to help bail out the
utilities.  Proposals on the table include:  Blackout Bonds;Bailout Bonds;
Davis Debts; Blunder Bonds; Fiasco Funds.

###

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/31/2001 09:45 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: carton

Here is a cartoon you might like to pass on

 - lightswitch.pdf
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:31 PM -----

	Daniel Casse <dcasse@whwg.com>
	01/31/2001 09:47 AM

		 To: <skean@enron.com>, <mpalmer@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: two cartoons

either of these cartoons might work well with the news about the energy
czars.

--
Daniel Casse
White House Writers Group
615-297-5999
615-297-5908 (fax)

 - powercorrupts.pdf
 - PleaseSir.pdf


eSource presents Lexis-Nexis training

ADVANCED

This session will cover advanced searching tips.  It will also cover using
Smart Indexing to narrow your search results.  Find out how to customize your
desktop for easier searching.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Advanced Clinic:

May. 18     8:30 - 10:00 AM    EB572

PUBLIC RECORDS

Lexis-Nexis is the premier provider of public record information.  We will
learn about materials available to you including Secretary of State Filings
and DBA's, UCC filings, Bankruptcies, and Property Records.  If you are doing
due diligence on companies, especially smaller ones, this is a session you
will want
to attend.

Attend our Lexis-Nexis Public Records Clinic:

May. 18    10:30 AM -12:00 NOON      EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
Cost $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one,
a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com


I was sending you the weather for New Orleans - Partly cloudy starting
thursday.
PL


1.  I was not sure whose doc the referenced notice was, but I think the
address should be Talon c/o LJM2@ Co-Investment, L.P.  rather than just to
Talon.

2.  Vargas met with me last night.  I am printing out and copying proposal
sheets and valuations and stock ownership (the latter of which they are
making corrections to and resending this morning.  My asst. is coordinating a
meeting with Stuart, Sara and myself this morning to coordinate further
review actions and swap preparation.

3.  Based upon the latest voice from Sefton re note adjustment, I checked
with A. Currey and she advised that nothing need be said in the swap re same
as the structure docs will automatically cause payment via adjustment.

Mary


-----Original Message-----
From: 	General Announcement/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Stan Horton - Chairman & CEO of Enron Global Services@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:09 PM
To:	All ETS Announcement@ENRON
Subject:	Northern Natural Gas

Dear ETS Colleague:

On Thursday, January 3, Enron entered into a settlement over Dynegy's exercise of its option to acquire the Northern Natural Gas pipeline.  The settlement allows Dynegy to exercise the option and assume interim control of the pipeline while Enron pursues its damage claim against Dynegy.

In this respect, Enron Corp. has carefully weighed the substantial costs and turmoil that litigating this possession issue would create for the company and the employees of Northern Natural Gas.  Consequently, Enron Corp. has decided not to contest interim possession and allow the transfer of Northern Natural Gas to Dynegy, while the larger issues affecting its future are resolved.

The company has concluded that with this settlement, Enron should be able to resolve the issue more quickly, as well as avoid the legal cost burden and distractions to the business from protracted litigation in state court.  For the Northern Natural Gas employees, I believe this decision should allow them to steer clear of the dispute and focus on the day-to-day satisfaction of running a valuable, successful business.

Beginning immediately we will be working to achieve a smooth transition and to align the appropriate resources to assure continued safe, reliable and efficient operation of Northern Natural Gas.

Over many years we have run high quality, cost conscious and profitable businesses in ETS.  Keep up the good work!

Stan


The preliminary research supports your conclusion.  I intend to have another pass tomorrow on the available literature to confirm.

Best regards

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr; Alvarez, Ray
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Gottfredson, Bryan
Subject:	RE: CalPX Collateral Issue

To the best of my knowledge there is no CAISO requirement that a Scheduling Coordinator be a participant in the PX.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Gottfredson, Bryan
Subject:	RE: CalPX Collateral Issue

This is a quick note to let the team know that I do have the credit worthiness requirements for PX (FERC Electric Service Tariff, Art. 2.4); a summary could be prepared if needed.   I trust that the Team would benefit from a legal opinion on Art. 2.4.5, and the associated schedule 2 of the tariff  related to "Changes in the Amount of Security Provided by a PX Participant"  which allows a refund of securities above the PX security Amount.  As Steve mentioned nicely below, if the security amount is zero, then perhaps there is an argument for a full refund.

On the same theme, I am investigating  the requirements for maintaining ESP (electricity service provider) in California.  One of the conditions is that the ESP is eligible as a participant in the CA ISO.  If the CA ISO also necessitates participant status in the PX for  some transactions, then there is a circular flow in the argument, and may be there is a need to maintain a form of relationship with the PX.

I shall keep you posted with progress.

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:45 PM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	CalPX Collateral Issue

Thanks Steve.  With your input, my take on Elizabeth's questions are:

1.	Must we renew the collateral?-  From a legal standpoint the answer is "No" for the reasons discussed below.  However, as we know, the PX will take a contrary position and has (along with other California parties) taken the position at FERC that the collateral should be withheld pending resolution of the CA refund case at FERC (to secure payment of refunds due).

2.	May we replace the letters of credit with cash / other collateral?-  The answer is "Yes" as you note below, with the caveat that the replacement collateral must be acceptable to the PX.  Obviously cash should be acceptable.  Perhaps a bond or negotiable instrument could be an option.

3.	What is the potential outcome if we do nothing (i.e. we don't re-up the letters of credit).  Our past experience in this regard has been that the PX will draw on the letter of credit prior to its expiration.

As for additional options, we could consider:

1. 	Further to Steve's option 1, we might try to enforce the return of the excess in court by submitting a Section 2.5 request to the PX and bringing the issue to a head.  Steve's original option is preferable, however, since it is through agreement with the PX.  Perhaps a compromise could be proposed for the PX to return our collateral over and above our highest potential refund liability to the PX in the CA refund case.

2.	Seeking injunctive relief in court to prevent the PX from drawing on the letter of credit.

Elizabeth, please advise if this answers your questions fully.

Thanks,  Ray

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Alvarez, Ray
Subject:	RE:

I agree.

Schedule 2, section 2 says:  "Each PX Participant shall post collateral for 100 % of its requirements in excess of the unsecured line of credit in order to participate in the CTS and Core Markets"  [I would note that (1) our "requirements" are currently zero, and (2) we do not wish, nor is it possible to "participate" in the CTS and Core Markets.  Therefore, the PX has no basis under its Tariff to continue to hold our collateral.]

As you indicated below, Schedule 2, section 2.2 says:  "Each PX Participant shall maintain sufficient collateral to cover its aggregate outstanding liabilities in the Day-Ahead and Day-Of markets to and from the PX between cash clearing cycles or during the period in which the liabilities are incurred and when payment is billed and settled."

Options:

1.  If the PX will allow us to have access to our excess cash pursuant to Section 2.5 (requests submitted by COB Wednesday will be processed by Friday), then let them cash in the LC.

2.  Ask the PX if we can substitute "other liquid collateral acceptable to the PX. .  .in lieu of cash" (Schedule 2, section 2.1.3).  We should ask them what else would be acceptable (a lien on Jeff Skilling's house?).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE:

Steve, I believe that schedule 2, section 2.2 of the CalPX tariff is the provision that requires market participants to maintain collateral, the purpose of which, however, is to provide security for liabilities incurred in the PX markets.  Since these markets are no longer in operation, there is no lawful reason to withhold the collateral, notwithstanding the assertions of CA parties that it should be used to guarantee payment of refunds ordered in the CA refund proceeding at FERC.  Ray

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject:

Elizabeth, per our conversation, I am obtaining and attaching various pleadings before FERC I've worked on seeking return of the collateral and the reasons why it should not be withheld by the PX.  It's my understanding that these might help- please let me know.  There are other related filings and I will forward them as soon as I locate.  In the meantime, I am working with Steve Hall to get an independent interpretation of the PX tariff so as to yield answers to our questions and our options.  Thanks,  Ray

 << File: #150515 v1 - CPS COMMENTS ON BIRCHMAN ORDER.doc >>  << File: Answer (chargeback) EL01-36.doc >>


I have received your e-mail.  Thank you for your thoughts.


Actually, I can't.  I just checked my calendar and I have a meeting at
10:00.  How about before then?

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, Suite 3842
Houston, Texas 77002
Tele. (713) 345-8347
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
e-mail:  angela.davis@enron.com


Please take a look and see if you think it does what we're after.  I'd like
to share with folks as soon as possible to try to get something in the bill.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:45 PM -----

	MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	07/05/2001 02:39 PM

		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich  Enron SF'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Amendment to Sher Bond bill

 <<X25946.DOC>>

Here is the very short amendment for the Sher Bond Bill.  Mike Day

 - X25946.DOC


All,

As many of you already know, I decided to take a position at EES, so this week suppose to be my last week in the Gas Fundamentals Group.
It is a pretty satisfactory feeling to the reporting team and myself that we are able to contribute to the success of gas trading by providing over
100 reports every day. I certainly appreciated all your help, cooperation and friendship. Needless to say it was a great experience to work with
you all.

At Dave Dronet's request I'll stay one more week to transit my responsibilities to Kim Alexsander next week. Kim will lead the reporting team
and continue provide the excellent support to you all. The reporting team is in good hands. Even after I move to another group,
I am just a phone call away, I'll let you know my new phone # and continue to help you wherever I can.

Thanks....

Yan Wang
x33228


Ben,

Has the payment allocation chart been updated, and if so, could I get a copy?

Thanks,

Kay


Plz send to Hartsoe for comment.  GP
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Scott,

Please stop by when you visit Houston.
Give me a few days' warning to set up a meeting.

Vince

Scott Wakefield <scottw@mathworks.com> on 08/09/2000 06:38:47 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: MATLAB at Enron

Hello Vince :

I'm the Territory Manager for the MathWorks, we develop MATLAB technical
software. We've recently developed tools well suited for Energy Trading
Industry.

Enron has used our products in the past, but all of those end-users have
left Enron.

Risk Management and Research groups at Southern Energy, TXU, Dynegy, El
Paso Energy, Koch, Calpine, Reliant and others have recently started using
our products in the following ways.

1. Create sophisticated option pricing models, risk analysis models, and
stress analysis models. Creating GUI front ends for the end-users.
2. Pull in Data from ODBC, Corba, and SAS databases to evaluate.
3. Visualize the results and quantify the solution.
4. Compile these models and distribute these applications to their
Traders, Analysists and Managers with no distribution costs.

Who should I contact at your company to discuss Enron's situation to see if
our can help Enron as it has with our other Energy customers?

Thank you for your time and help.
==================================
Scott Wakefield
The MathWorks, Inc.
Phone: (508) 647-7282
Fax: (508) 647-4275
E-mail: swakefield@mathworks.com
http://www.mathworks.com
==================================
MATLAB News Group:
news:comp.soft-sys.matlab
==================================
Visit the new MathWorks Store and buy MATLAB, Simulink
and all of our products online
http://www.mathworks.com/store/


Linda:

Will you follow-up with Tanya in Credit as to exactly what type of documents you need copies of, or arrange for someone to go and look through her files?  Tanya's phone # is 33263.

Thanks!

Marie
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rohauer, Tanya
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:21 PM
To:	Heard, Marie; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE: Texon Energy Corporation and Lonestar Petroleum Corporation

Texon, L.P. looks like a liquids customer.  we do have a file. Marie, what type of "documents" are we supposed to be providing? Corp legal needs to be more specific or they can send someone down to copy our file. I do not show that we have a file for Lonestar.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Rohauer, Tanya; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Texon Energy Corporation and Lonestar Petroleum Corporation
Importance:	High

Diane, Tanya and Jay:

We have been requested in connection with an SEC subpoena to produce documents related to the referenced counterparties (including their parents, successors, subsidiaries, related corporations, partnerships or professional associations, affiliates, principals, officers, directors, general or limited partners, associates, employees, agents, and independent contractors).  We have checked our Lotus Notes database and don't have a record for either of these entities.

Will you let me know if your groups have had any dealings with these two entities or know of a business person who has done business with either of these entities?  We MUST respond to Enron Corp. Legal by noon Thursday (10/4).

Thanks!

Marie


FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 2:28 PM
To: 'Josh Bortman'
Subject: RE: Bidding

Josh.  Been in a meeting all morning.  Think I missed the bidding.  If I can't get in, here are my bids:

E280--Real Estate & Urban Land:  	500 pts
E286--Global Strategy:			500 pts

If this won't work, just let me know. Sorry for any mixup.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Bortman [mailto:bortman@haas.berkeley.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:30 PM
To: sidbury@haas.berkeley.edu; jestings@haas.berkeley.edu;
huey@haas.berkeley.ed; llevine@haas.berkeley.edu;
kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu; balwani@haas.berkeley.edu;
andychen@haas.berkeley.edu; graca@haas.berkeley.edu;
jagannat@haas.berkeley.edu; guinney@haas.berkeley.edu;
sklarin@haas.berkeley.edu; keffer@haas.berkeley.edu;
lysaght@haas.berkeley.edu; vavrek@haas.berkeley.edu;
clee@haas.berkeley.edu; fiske@haas.berkeley.edu; pine@haas.berkeley.edu;
debruyn@haas.berkeley.edu; scharf@haas.berkeley.edu;
cjenkins@haas.berkeley.edu; kerudi@haas.berkeley.edu;
tamborni@haas.berkeley.edu; blanchar@haas.berkeley.edu;
wadhwa@haas.berkeley.edu; jhowe@haas.berkeley.edu;
azhao@haas.berkeley.edu; asbo@haas.berkeley.edu;
magner@haas.berkeley.edu; keshav@haas.berkeley.edu;
shrivast@haas.berkeley.edu; viswanat@haas.berkeley.edu;
hari@haas.berkeley.edu; vbansal@haas.berkeley.edu;
mendelso@haas.berkeley.edu; hornbeck@haas.berkeley.edu;
dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu; langridg@haas.berkeley.edu
Cc: tj@haas.berkeley.edu
Subject: Bidding

This is a reminder to all 3rd year students that you should be bidding for
classes today. The first round of bidding ends tomorrow Thursday, November
8, at 12 noon. If you have any questions please give us a call at 510-642-1406

Good Luck

Josh Bortman
EWMBA Program


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
04:35 PM ---------------------------
From: Shalesh Ganjoo@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/07/2000 10:03 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: gappy@stanfordalumni.org, Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Shalesh Ganjoo/Contractor/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Technical Survey

Gentlemen,

We are attaching below a document on Internet Protocol (IP) written by
Martin.  We hope you will find it informative and provide us with some feed
back to improve it.  Shalesh is still working on documents for fiber optics
and storage.  We felt that they were not complete and therefore not ready for
review.  We hope to have them ready for your review soon.  In the mean time
we would appreciate any comments you may have about the IP document.  Thank
you.

Sincerely,

Shalesh and Martin


You're welcome........per my voice mail, sorry for delay.  It's been a Monday, I think Richard Sanders was talking away from the phone, it was hard to hear what he was saying.

Linda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Noske, Linda J.
Subject:	RE: Reliant Protective Order

Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Noske, Linda J.
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Reliant Protective Order

	Draft of transcribed message from Richard Sanders voice mail (Legal) to Rick Shapiro.  Rick forwarded to Jim Steffes.

	FYI:

	"We have not seen the Reliant Protective Order.  It's only been described to me by their General Counsel.  And in the way it was described it was a document that  we would probably agree to, because there's still some corks(? and provisions over disagreements about the Confidentiality.

		So, I'm gonna try to get Mike Kirby to get ahold of it this a.m. in terms of the theme to the Legislators.  The question I've got is why haven't we even been offered that same deal?  It shows clearly that they're trying to isolate us, and that they're treating us differently from everyone else., but I'm not sure how far that goes....."


Marcie Youngerman just called with a request for a sample ISDA.  No CP name.
Exclusions included. Today.  Thanks.  Sara


Thank you, Erica.  I'm waiting to Jeff to return from a meeting (within an hour or so).  He is currently scheduled to be in Europe the week of September 24, so at this time, he is not available for a September 25 dinner.  I'll advise as soon as I have a chance to speak to him.  Thanks again for your help.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 01:46:00 PM
To:	"'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:	RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Sheri:

Thanks for the response.  Our next dinner is scheduled for September 25, at
the moment I'm not sure who the other invitees would be.  Jerry would
probably have a better idea as he puts together the guest list for each
event and may already have something in mind.  That's actually another
reason why I think we should leave the call tomorrow on the calendar.
Depending on Mr. Skillings availability/interest Jerry might want to
reconfigure his invitee list for the most appropriate mix of people.

Regards,
Erica Harris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Erica Harris
Cc: Joannie.Williamson@enron.com
Subject: RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Erica, thanks for the note.  Joannie has left the office for the day, but
will return tomorrow morning.

In the meantime, I'll run this by Jeff to see if he thinks it makes sense.
Do you have any dates for future dinners in mind?  The vast majority of
Jeff's time is committed through February 2002, so knowing what the
dates/timeframes are would be most helpful in the event we need to try to
free up some time.  Thank you.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 12:16:12 PM

To:   "'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Probably the best thing is for the call to go ahead, that way Jerry can
brief Mr. Skilling on our plans for the remaining dinners throughout the
year and Mr. Skilling can decide on the best one for him to attend.

Does that sound feasible to you?
Erica

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Erica Harris
Subject: Re: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Erica, Jeff is currently scheduled to be on vacation July 19.  Would it be
possible to schedule during the next quarter?

Thanks,
Joannie

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 12:09:54 PM

To:   "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Dear Mr. Skilling:

I write on behalf of Jerry Murdock, who is currently in Europe.  Mr.
Murdock
asked me to pass on the following information regarding your telephone call
scheduled for 10:00am (CST) on Tuesday, May 15.

Insight Capital hosts a quarterly dinner with Robert Rubin and Steve
Friedman and other selected guests.  Our next dinner is scheduled for July
19 and will be held in Aspen, Colorado.  The Current State of the Global
Market will be one of the topics under discussion and Jack Welch of GE is
one of your fellow invitees.

The purpose of your conversation with Mr. Murdock is to discuss the above
in
more detail and to more fully brief you on the purpose of these dinners.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further
information.

Erica Harris
Insight Capital Partners
680 Fifth Avenue
8th Floor
New York, NY  10019
(212) 230-9276

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the
message,
is strictly forbidden.

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the
message,
is strictly forbidden.

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the message,
is strictly forbidden.


Please read the attached memorandum regarding the above-referenced matter.


Calif Officials Examine Cal-ISO, CalPX Merger

09/21/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California officials are examining the possibility
of a merger between the state's Independent System Operator and the
California Power Exchange.
The state auditor's office met Monday with the ISO to look into the ISO's
operations and its relationship with the CalPX, according to documents
obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
The audit was requested by state senator Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, who
believes a merger between the ISO and the CalPX would make California's
electricity market more competitive, said Jan Smutny-Jones, chairman of the
ISO Board of Governors.
The ISO controls 75% of the state's electricity grid and real-time
electricity market. The CalPX is the spot market where electricity is bought
and sold in the state.
Monday's meeting, which lasted approximately 1 1/2 hours, was largely
introductory, said ISO legal counsel Charles Robinson.
"There were five or six people from the auditor's office, and they talked
briefly about the scope of the audit and the time frame. We provided
information on how the markets work and the ISO's organizational structure,"
Robinson said.
The auditor's office will meet with the ISO Monday for 4-5 hours for a
"training session on ISO 101," Robinson said. Once the office has a sense of
the ISO's activities, he said, a more intensive document and on-site review
will take place.
The audit is expected to be finished by spring, said state auditor Mary
Noble.
Senator Peace requested the audit in mid-August due to concern over high
wholesale electricity costs and the doubling of electricity rates paid by San
Diego customers.
San Diegans are the first to pay market-based electricity rates under the
state's 1998 deregulation law. A recent report by the Electricity Oversight
Board and the California Public Utilities Commission showed that wholesale
electricity prices in the state have increased 270% over the same period in
1999.
In his audit request, Peace said he also wanted to examine how effective the
ISO and CalPX were at detecting and correcting market problems.
Peace, who is running for California Secretary of State, is the architect of
the state's deregulation law and has sponsored several bills to refine that
law.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3761,
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 56

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


The spreadsheet you sent will not open up and calculate any yields.  Can you resend?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Matthews, Steven" <steven.matthews@ubspainewebber.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:	Muni Proposal

Phillip,

I have the proposal for you.  Take a look at it and try to respond as soon
as possible.  These are bonds in inventory right now that we can buy.  So,
if you want this please let me know ASAP.

Thanks,

Steve

 <<HS-STEVE MATTHEWS#2.xls>>

******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.

Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.
 - HS-STEVE MATTHEWS#2.xls << File: HS-STEVE MATTHEWS#2.xls >>


friday.  i am gonna pick me up a call girl and act out dirty fantasies all
weekend.  i want to be dressed in diapers and spanked like a bad boy.  i want
to have my diapers changed.  how much do you think all that would cost?