----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:08 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	10/24/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kazeem
Khan/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 05:24 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/24/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


>From: "Katie A Rice" <p194rak@FDS.com>
>To: kimberly_kirkwood@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fw: Chinese Horoscope (It really works - try it)
>Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 11:57:41 -0800
>
>
>Katie Rice
>Advertising/Always Available Coordinator
>Men's Shoes
>(415)984-7310
>(415)984-7308 (fax)
>----- Forwarded by Katie A Rice/MW/FDS on 03/05/01 11:58 AM -----
>
>                     Jill Fong
>                                          To:     Katie A
>                     03/05/01             Rice/MW/FDS@FDS-Notes, Patti
>                     10:37 AM             Adelman/MW/FDS@FDS-Notes
>                                          cc:
>                                          Subject:     Fw: Chinese
>                                          Horoscope (It really works -
>                                          try it)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >THIS IS AMAZINGLY ACCURATE......
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >CHINESE HOROSCOPE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >The year of the iron dragon, wishing you
> >prosperity
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > and good fortune in the
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >Chinese New Year. Follow the instructions, DO
>NOT
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > CHEAT OR IT WON'T WORK,
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >and you will wish you hadn't. Take 3 minutes and
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > try this. It will freak
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >you out.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >The person who sent this said her wish came true
> >10
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > minutes after they read
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >the mail, but no cheating. This game has a
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > funny/creepy outcome. Don't
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >read
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >ahead. Just do it. It takes 3 minutes. Worth a
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > try.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >FIRST GET PEN AND PAPER
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >WHEN YOU FINALLY CHOOSE NAMES, MAKE SURE IT'S
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > PEOPLE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW, AND
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >GO WITH YOUR FIRST INSTINCTS !!!!!
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >SCROLL DOWN ONE LINE AT THE TIME - DON'T READ
> >AHEAD
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > OR YOU'LL RUIN THE FUN
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >1. FIRST, WRITE NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 11 IN A COLUMN
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >2. THEN, BESIDE NUMBERS 1 AND 2, WRITE DOWN ANY
>2
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > NUMBERS YOU WANT
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >3. BESIDES THE 3 AND 7, WRITE DOWN THE NAMES OF
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > MEMBERS OF THE OPPOSITE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >SEX
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >DON'T LOOK AHEAD OR IT WON'T TURN OUT RIGHT
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >4. WRITE ANYONE'S NAME (LIKE FRIENDS OR FAMILY
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > ..... IN THE 4TH, 5TH, AND
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >6TH SPOT
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >DON'T CHEAT OR YOU'LL BE UPSET THAT YOU DID
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >5. WRITE DOWN FOUR SONG TITLES IN 8, 9, 10, AND
>11
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >6. FINALLY MAKE A WISH
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >AND THERE IS THE KEY OF THE GAME
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >1. YOU MUST TELL (THE NUMBER IN SPACE 2) PEOPLE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > ABOUT THIS GAME
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >2. THE PERSON IN SPACE 3 IS THE ONE YOU LOVE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >3. THE PERSON IN 7 IS ONE YOU LIKE BUT CAN'T
>WORK
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > OUT
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >4. YOU CARE MOST ABOUT THE PERSON YOU PUT IN 4
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >5. THE PERSON YOU NAME IN NUMBER 5 IS THE ONE
>WHO
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > KNOWS YOU VERY WELL
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >6. THE PERSON YOU NAMED IN 6 IS THE YOUR LUCKY
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > STAR
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >7. THE SONG IN 8 IS THE SONG THAT MATCHES WITH
>THE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > PERSON IN NUMBER 3
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >8. THE TITLE IN 9 IS THE SONG FOR THE PERSON IN
>7
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >9. THE 10TH SPACE IS THE SONG THAT TELLS YOU
>MOST
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > ABOUT YOUR MIND
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >10. AND 11 IS THE SONG TELLING HOW YOU FEEL
>ABOUT
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > LIFE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >SEND THIS TO 10 PEOPLE WITHIN THE HOUR YOU READ
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > THIS. IF YOU DO, YOUR WISH
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >WILL COME TRUE. IF YOU DON'T IT WILL BECOME THE
> > > > > > > > > > > >> > OPPOSITE
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> > >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Vince,

Thanks.

-- Gwyn

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
05/02/2001 03:20 PM
To:	Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:	Re: Country Risk Jr. Economist hiring

Gwyn,

Try to reduce the number of potential candidates to 3, before I shall
get involved.

Also, I contacted HR regarding your promotion.
The process has started.

Vince

Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
05/02/2001 03:09 PM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Country Risk Jr. Economist hiring

Thanks Vince.  I have the resume book from SAIS.  I'd like to start contacting them individually telephonically prior to meeting with Maureen.  I will begin to contact them and do some initial screening.  Would you like to participate in the initial screening?

THanks, -- Gwyn

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
05/02/2001 03:06 PM
To:	Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Re: Country Risk Jr. Economist hiring

Gwyn,

Yes, please  go ahead and get a resume book from SAIS.

Vince

Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
05/02/2001 11:40 AM
To:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Country Risk Jr. Economist hiring

Vince,

Maureen had mentioned to me a while back that our group had approval to hire an junior/full economist.  She then asked me to contact Johns Hopkins SAIS to get resumes of possible candidates.  I have completed all this.  But, before I begin contacting these potential candidates, I wanted to confirm with you that we have the approval to hire another person at the either junior or associate economist level.

Thank you.

Gwyn Koepke

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Dear Director Vince Kaminsky,

I am Alex Yu, an MBA student at Rice University. Peter
Veruki, Executive Director of Career Planning and
Admissions, told me that he and Dean Gilbert Whitaker
had breakfast with you today, and that you might be
interested in hiring a summer intern or part-time
helper.

I have received a Ph.D. in Finance, MS in Accounting,
and MS and BS in Computer Science. In the course of my
studies, I have learned a great deal about finance,
mathematics, and computer software. I am very
interested in working in your program at Enron as a
summer intern or a part-time employee. My resume is
attached. Thank you for your consideration.

Best wishes,

Alex Guang Yu

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 - resume.doc


I've spoken with Pushkar regarding the ECP interest rate hedges. There were two sets of hedges put in place. Notional value of $32.68mm executed 5/16/2000 and $350mm on 3/15/2001. I have asked Pushkar to research the cash flows he hedged to determine how those tranche sizes came about.

The Fair Value of Enron's equity and sub debt (net of the $30mm Merlin piece) per the DASH of December 7, 2000 indicated a value at that time of $360mm. Additionally, the DASH assumed further gain in the base case of approximately $8mm suggesting there might have been $368mm of value to hedge. Because the generic five year Treasury yields also declined from 5.262% on Dec 7 (DASH date) to 4.508% by March 15 (closing/hedging date), the value of the El Paso fixed cash flow stream would have increased in value above $368mm (perhaps to the $380mm range - that's what I've asked Pushkar to check), it would seem to indicate that the original hedges were rolled into the subsequent hedges to represent the value of the entire transaction at final closing. In that case, the original Linden 6 hedges would not be open positions at all but rather a part of the hedging strategy that was required at closing per the executed DASH.

Pushkar has indicated he will look into his files to ascertain how the hedges were sized. Assuming the above accurately portrays what occurred, it would appear the transaction steps at execution followed the DASH requirements. I will followup as early as possible next week.

Joe


fyi, we have staff meetings on the first and third Wednesdays, at 130.  The
meetings usually last an hour or less.

ckm


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:01 AM
To:	Harris, Stephanie J ; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: BAKER & McKENZIE

Jim,

B&M are our lead firm in Japan, and are used extensively by Jane McBride, and also on a more sporadic basis by businesses in London (eg metals and the Wind business) which have operations in Japan. Enron Wind in Japan have appointed Paul Davies of B&M in Tokyo to act on a joint venture for Enron Wind in Japan.

In the summer of 2000, we undertook some basic physical gas due diligence re gas in the Ukraine utilising Baker & McKenzie's Kiev office.  This was in preparation for a potential long-term gas deal to get gas out of the Ukraine to the Romanian border (for onward sale in Romania / Poland).  B&M was the only "recognised" firm in the Ukraine.

That's it.

							Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Stephanie J
Sent:	14 November 2001 20:29
To:	#99 Tech Support,; Ale, John; Alvis, Connie; Braden, Erica; Cartier, Autumn; Cheek, Charles; Dapolite, Gail; Dodgen, Kathy; Elbertson, Janette; Esparza, Elaine; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Forsyth, Darlene C.; Fossum, Drew; Foy, Tracy; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hicks, Debra; Jebousek, Diana; Johnson, Kelly; Kumbalek, Lisa M.; Labanowski, Elizabeth; Lawless, Michelle; Lewis, Karen; Manly, Marc; Mintz, Jordan; Mordaunt, Kristina; Murray, Tanja; Newell, Eric; Nichols, Douglas; Place, Janet; Raybon, Betsy; Rieker, Paula; Rogers, Rex; Sample, Molly; Sellers, Emily; Sharp, Vicki; Wallace, Stephen; Walls Jr., Rob
Subject:	MESSAGE FROM JIM DERRICK

Please let me know what matters you currently have or have had within the last two years, with the law firm of Baker & McKenzie.

Please let me know promptly.

Jim Derrick


The settlement price for the last scheduled Commodity Business Day of the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract for the applicable Calculation Period


Larry,
    Given your background and association with the Naval Reserve, I would
recommend that as your quickest route to intelligence analysis.  However, do
not limit yourself to DIA and NSA.  Go on-line to www.firstgov.org   and
look at all of the US intelligence community employment opportunities,
including the FBI , CIA, and Treasury, et al.  Your language skills and
foreign travel will be especially valuable.

    I would be pleased to advise you as you pursue a career change.
Cheers/JWL

----- Original Message -----
From: "May, Larry" <Larry.May@ENRON.com>
To: <jwlucas@erols.com>
Sent: Monday, 24 September, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: An AMU student

Dear Dr. Lucas,

I am a part-time student at American Military University in the MA
program in Intelligence Studies.  Currently, I am enrolled in Dr.
Lockwood's Analytic Methods course.  I have been planning to finish my
MA (I have an MBA from the University of Washington as well) in three
years and then begin a second career in intelligence analysis (I am
currently an Energy commodities trader with Enron Corp in Houston,
Texas).  However, with the events on Sept. 11, I wish to apply now for a
position.  If it is convenient,  I would like to discuss career
opportunities in government service with you.  Attached are the cover
letter and resume I have already sent the DIA and NSA.  Given the events
of the last two weeks,  I know you must be extremely busy and appreciate
any time you may spare.

Sincerely,

Lawrence J. May
Wk. 713 853-6731 email larry.may@enron.com
Hm. 281 379-1525 email ljnmay@aol.com

 <<LJMayCoverLetter.doc>>  <<LJMayResume.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Mary,

Set forth below are the provisions that should be included in a margin
agreement whereby ENA will borrow funds from a non-U.S. entity (i.e., ABN
AMRO) and make payments of principal and interest pursuant to the borrowing.
As you'll note, the language provides that ENA will only be required to make
(and be liable for) payments of interest that are net of any U.S. withholding
tax and, thus, ABN AMRO will bear the burden of any U.S. withholding tax.

All payments under this Agreement shall be made without any deduction or
withholding for or on account of any Tax unless such deduction or withholding
is required by any applicable law, as modified by the practice of any
relevant governmental revenue authority, then in effect.  If a party is so
required to deduct or withhold, then that party ("X") shall (a) pay to the
relevant authorities the full amount required to be withheld promptly upon
the earlier of determining that such deduction or withholding is required or
receiving notice that such amount has been assessed against Y, (b) pay and be
liable to Y for only the net amount owed after reduction for any Tax, and (c)
promptly forward to Y an official receipt (or a copy thereof), or other
documentation reasonably acceptable to Y, evidencing such payment to such
authorities.

"Tax" means any present or future tax, levy, impost, duty, charge, assessment
or fee of any nature (including interest, penalties, and additions thereto)
that is imposed by any government or other taxing authority in respect of any
payment under this Agreement.

Please contact me at ext. 35777 with any questions.

Best regards,

Jeff

MARY COOK
07/14/2000 11:18 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Margin Lines:   Bank One and ABN

Bank One Line is closing today, with give up agreement to be finalized early
next week.  If there is any particular "file" processing for credit lines
applicable to this group, please advise.  Otherwise, I will have file with
originals set up and provided to Kay Young for central file room.

ABN further comments are due Monday and phone conference indicates very few
issues.  Should close next week.

By copy to Jeff, please provide tax comments on ABN on Monday.  Thank you.
Mary


Here is a draft position report we talked about previously. We had delayed
distribution because we were waiting for some important input on the Sithe
contract.

The report attempts to view various assets and positions entirely on an
economic basis, regardless of accounting treatment. Currently this is not
exhaustive since the universe of economic exposure is significant but if
useful we will spread the net.

Here are the highlights:

Enron stock option plans:

ENE is low and volatility is around 45 - 50%. We are working with Global
Finance and Accounting on a hedging proposal.

J Block CRTA:

We have not factored in the impact of yesterday's House of Lords ruling on
this contract.

Korea:

USD/KRW has gone from 1205 to 1368. Economic outlook is bleak. Enron's
currency translation account (CTA) has gone from $19m Dr to $40m Dr since
January.

Brazil:

Argentina's woes are not helping. USD/BRL is currently 2.17 from 1.95 in
January. CTA has suffered $173m in losses and now stands at $663m Dr.

Thoughts and comments welcome.

Rgds
DP


---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 01/18/2001 01:35 PM
---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/18/2001 12:54 PM

To: Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power IS NOT LADWPPX

Just FYI - I believe you entered these deals on Jan. 16. What were you
thinking? How long have you worked here? Can you say, "wrong counterparty
name"? Also, why don't you have your own trader ID yet? Geez.

Sincerely,
Kate

P.S. Don't worry - I corrected them for you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 01/18/2001 12:56 PM
---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
01/18/2001 12:47 PM
To: Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Please change deal nos. 497905 and 498198 to Los Angelese Department of Water
& Power.


please let me know what the physical power attorney advises...this is news to me.  yes, we need to at minimum setoff our affiliates with the cp.  -Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:23 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Tracy:

Let me know what you think.  I'll check with a lawyer from the physical power group.  Also, we should at a minimum, preserve setoff with respect to ENA's affiliates.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:18 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Yaish, Yair
Subject:	RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Sara -

I have spoken with our in-house regulatory specialist and she has informed
me that we cannot agree to include our regulated or non-regulated Affiliates
in Set Off under the Public Utility Holding Company Act without getting
approval from the SEC.

Please advise if we can proceed on the ISDA with carving out Affiliates in
Set Off, as per our original request.

Regards,
Michelle

Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711

-----Original Message-----
From: Sternberg, Michelle
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Cc: Yaish, Yair
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Sara -

I am checking internally if we can agree to the below.  I will get back to
you in the beginning of next week.

Regards,
Michelle

Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM
To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com
Cc: Marie.Heard@enron.com
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Michelle:

With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff
for your non-regulated affiliates.  Perhaps you could provide us with the
regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out.  I look forward to hearing from
you.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm
arkets+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara
   Cc:     Heard, Marie
   Subject:  ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline
   incorporating
   the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of ISDA
   (modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions).  The attached is
   the
   last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would
   suggest
   that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of agreement
   since it is the final version.

    <<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>>

   Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at
   which
   point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature
   page)
   via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the
   Schedule with your revised Schedule.

   Thank you for your patience.

   Regards,
   Michelle

    - ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED
   9.26.01.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020619.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/6/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


The list looks fine to me.

Alan

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           03/06/2000 05:44 PM

To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Emmisions Contact List

Attached is the list of the counterparties that EOL wants to approve for
emissions auction trading.  Please let me know ASAP if there are any
counterparties on this list that should not be allowed to trade emissions
auctions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 05:40 PM
---------------------------

Eric Saibi@ENRON
03/06/2000 04:23 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Emmisions Contact List

As requested, attatched is the priority list for the EOL Emmisions Auction.


Michelle;

Can you take a look at this.  I need some guidance on how to respond.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Inglis, Elspeth
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Corteselli, Gina
Subject: FW: Queries
Sensitivity: Confidential

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Whyte, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Inglis, Elspeth
Cc: Hatton, Debra
Subject: Queries
Sensitivity: Confidential

Hi Elspeth

As I think I mentioned, we have an employment tribunal going on at the moment
and we need to find out some information urgently re the PEP system.  If oyu
could help with this then that would be great:

After what period of time following the completion of the PRC process is the
PEP system (specifically the 360 feedback forms)destroyed

Why the 360 feedback forms are destroyed

When and exactly how each of the reviews was destroyed, by whom, who approved
and who supervised?

Many thanks

Kate


Judging by the length of the spreadsheet, it looks like a pervasive problem.
Nancy and I will work with debbie/some in credit to determine
physical/financial guidelines and roll this out to the risk management groups.

	Enron Technology

	From:  John D Powell @ ECT                           12/14/2000 01:37 PM

To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Deals with P and F

Here are the deals with both P and F on them...


FYI.  I faxed the Tejas (Coral Energy Resources) Kingsville Interconnect
Agreement to Billy Shields today.  A copy of the transmitted document is
attached for your files.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


David,
I am forwarding to you, as promised, the text of the 10/04/2001  message to Ryan Siurek regarding Raptor valuations. The message is stored on my PC at home. It disappeared from my mailbox on the Enron system.
Vince Kaminski
*******************************************************************************
Subj:   FW: LJM/Raptor valuations
Date:   10/4/01 8:30:17 AM Central Daylight Time
From:    Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com (Kaminski, Vince J)
To:    vkaminski@aol.com

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Kaminski, Vince J
> Sent:    Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:28 AM
> To:    Siurek, Ryan
> Cc:    Kaminski, Vince J; Buy, Rick; Port, David
> Subject:    LJM/Raptor valuations
>
> Ryan,
>
> In the follow up to the meeting we had on Wednesday I would like
> to reinforce one point I made. I feel strongly that I cannot support
> the valuations my group has produced so far for the LJM/Raptor
> related transactions without examination of all the related legal
> documents.
>
> I feel that we did solid work based on verbal information,  but I
> cannot
> guarantee the quality of the final product without looking at the
> contracts.
> These transactions are too complex and controversial to bypass due
> diligence requirements
> that you would expect from any professional.
>
> Vince Kaminski
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (rly-yc05.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.37]) by air-yc04.mail.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINYC44-1004093017; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:30:17 2000
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by rly-yc05.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYC51-1004093003; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:30:03 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw03p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.110])
   by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id f94DU2302305
   for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified) by corp.enron.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T56633e1d36c0a86e6e7b0@corp.enron.com> for <vkaminski@aol.com>;
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.40]) by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
   Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:30:02 -0500
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Subject: FW: LJM/Raptor valuations
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 08:28:16 -0500
Message-ID: <31738B46B7BD864080808A19977D9F75449525@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: LJM/Raptor valuations
Thread-Index: AcFM2FMHpaiFOfRsQDCq6NwF20YoUQAABKQw
From: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
To: <vkaminski@aol.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2001 13:30:02.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC3E3750:01C14CD8]


keep buying N-M socal gd index up to plus .04.  I will buy as much as they
want to sell.  talk to amerex.

Mike


Scott:

Thanks.  These summaries are extremely well done and highly valued within the
company.  Thanks for the great work.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/24/2001 05:52 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick
Johnson <rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra
McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick
Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan
Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rod Wright briefing

Assemblyman Rod Wright held another one of his informal discussions with
generators, IOUs and marketers.  This is what he said:

Assembly Speaker Robert Hertzberg is going to introduce a bill tomorrow
at 11:00 a.m. which will contain many of the same elements in ABX 1,
minus the 5.5.  This will be a more comprehensive bill which will
address arrearage, securitization and include some type of a stop loss
mechanism among other things.  It is unclear whether or not the bill
will be voted on tomorrow or held until Monday, but there will be a
hearing at 2:00 p.m.

SBX 1 will probably be heard tomorrow as well, although it is not clear
what action if any the Senate Energy Committee will take.

There are ongoing discussions about the state creating a transmission
corporation to operate but not own the transmission system.

There are ongoing discussions about allowing DWR to buy existing block
forward contracts, however the courts today issued a stay to prevent SCE
or the PX from taking any actions on the contracts until at least
February 2.

There are ongoing discussions about issuing ratepayer bonds in place of
the full faith and credit of the state which was absent from the DWR
RFB.

Sempra requested that the legislature repeal Utilities Code Section
355.2 which prevents IOUs from buying outside the PX.

Other items which arose today:

We spent the day meeting with legislators regarding expedited siting.
The response was positive, including from Senator Byron Sher who is the
key environmentalist in the legislature.  Our initial focus has been on
the trouble with getting air credits.

Governor Davis held a press conference moments ago where he indicated
that the average bid price for the DWR RFB is 6.9.   I will forward the
press release in the morning.

I have attached a press release from Governor Davis regarding the new
ISO board which includes information on the new members.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmlprint.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@08
58855136.0980390190@@@@&BV_EngineID=faljlleidkhbemfcfkmchcgi.0&sFilePath=%2fgo
vsite%2fpress_release%2f2001_01%2f20010124_a01024_.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+DAVIS+
ANNOUNCES+FIRST+MEETING+OF+NEW+ISO+BOARD&sCatTitle=Press+Release&iOID=13102


Enron Benefit Plans
Summary Annual Report

The basic financial and insurance information on the back of this page, as
well as the material below, provide a Summary Annual Report for the Enron
Benefit Plans.  The annual report for each plan has been filed with the
Internal Revenue Service, as required by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

NOTE:  You may receive a report for a benefit plan in which you are not a
participant or under which you are not entitled.  Entitlement to benefits
under any of the plans is based on the provisions of each plan.

Your Rights to Additional Information

You have the right to receive, upon request, a copy of the full annual
report, or any part thereof, for any plan.  For insured plans, insurance
information (including any sales commissions paid by insurance carriers) is
shown in the annual reports.

To obtain a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any
plan, write or call:

Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7311

(713) 853-6161

You also have the right to receive from the plan administrator, on request
and at no charge, a statement of the assets and liabilities of the plan and
accompanying notes, or a statement of income and expenses of the plan and
accompanying notes, or both.  If you request a copy of the full annual report
from the plan administrator, these two statements and accompanying notes will
be included as part of that report.

You also have the legally protected right to examine the annual report at the
main office of the plan (Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX
77002-7311) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., or to
obtain a copy from the U.S. Department of Labor upon payment of copying
costs.  Requests to the Department should be addressed to:  Public Disclosure
Room, N-5638, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.


---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Moran/GPGFIN/Enron on 12/11/2000
04:31 PM ---------------------------

Mary Hain@ECT
12/11/2000 04:12 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT,
Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Parquet, Jake Thomas, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Sanders
cc:

Subject: SDG&E Asks FERC to cap capacity release rates

bchen@newenergy.com (Bill Chen) on 12/08/2000 12:13:42 PM
To: arm@phaser.com, jleslie@luce.com
cc:

Subject: Dec. 7 - SDG&E Press Release

CRECers,

Note attached SDG&E press release calling on Governor Davis to use his
emergency powers to remedy the accelerating energy crisis by taking a
number of actions, e.g., directing local air districts to temporarily lift
emissions limits for in-state power plants so that the plants which have
met or exceeded their air-emissions limits can run.  In addition, SDG&E
reported it made an emergency filing with FERC requesting an immediate
reinstatement of price caps on interstate natural gas pipeline
transportation to the CA border.

Bill

 - Sempra PR.doc


I will be out this Friday, Next Monday and Tuesday.  Dan will be out Monday
but I don't know what his role will be with respect to transport anymore.
Judy is out in the afternoons.

So, that leave Scott, Vickie, and myself.  Vickie's role has not been fully
explained to me but I'm sure she will be involved transport somehow.

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport Issues

We'll try for another day.

Thanks


Tana -

Consistent with our discussions and the feedback from Bob, attached is an
updated form of the BETA to be used for BrokerClient.  This form goes with
the form Fee Agreement I forwarded last week and should be used on all
BrokerClient deals going forward.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Karim Rashid Inc.
357 W 17th Street
New York NY 10011
p 212 929 8657
f 212 929 0247

www.karimrashid.com

----------
From: Jennifer Keller <jkeller@surfacemag.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 11:47:53 -0700
To: Karim Rashid <karim@karimrashid.com>, David Shearer
<david@totemdesign.com>, Cathryn Davis <cdavis@magnetcom.com>
Subject: Invite for T.A.G TEAM New York

Hello,

Attached please find the only kind of invite we have left--(we mailed to the
guest lists you provided a week ago.) Forward this to whomever you wish.

<< When printing select the LANDSCAPE format>>

 - invite jpg


These deals are entered with SP delivery point and firm energy type.

Thanks!

560021
560662


NRG AFFILIATES ASK FERC TO RULE ON DISPUTED STATION POWER ISSUES AFFECTING
DIVESTED GENERATION ASSETS

10/04/2000
Foster Electric Report
Page 13
(c) Copyright 2000, Foster Associates, Inc.
In a renewal of a controversy that has arisen several times in the past with
respect to the issue of station power, three NRG affiliates that purchased
electric generation facilities from Niagara Mohawk Corp. in 1999 -- Dunkirk
Power LLC, Huntley Power LLC and Oswego Harbor LLC (EL00-113) -- petitioned
FERC on 9/22/00 to declare that NRG's electric generation facilities have the
right (and have had this right since their purchase from Niagara Mohawk) to
treat station power as net/negative generation. The petitioners also asked
FERC to confirm they have the option of obtaining station power from the grid
at wholesale, regardless of whether the generation facility is running at
that specific time, together with the ability to net the station power from
the facility's sales to the wholesale energy market. Further, the petition
wants the Commission to declare that Niagara Mohawk cannot require any of
NRG's generation facilities to obtain station power under a retail tariff, or
resort to state law self-help procedures to bypass the Commission's
jurisdiction, disconnect or terminate station power, thereby shutting down
the facilities. Finally, pending resolution of the instant petition, the NRG
entities urged FERC to issue an interim order preventing Niagara Mohawk from
disconnecting or terminating station power for any NRG generation facility.
If station power service were terminated, the petition noted, the three NRG
entities would be unable to supply their total capacity of 3,060 MW to the
New York ISO control area.
The petition was prompted by Niagara Mohawk's commencement of billing in late
1999 and early 2000 for station power under its retail tariff for the three
NRG facilities, NRG questioned the bills since divested generation assets are
not subject to retail tariff rates under Commission precedent. While Niagara
Mohawk admitted that its retained generation facilities are still allowed to
treat station power as negative generation to be netted against output, it
responded to NRG's questions by sending disconnection notices to the NRG
facilities.
Historically, the NRG petition stressed, vertically integrated facilities
(including Niagara Mohawk) have treated -- and still treat -- station power
as net/negative generation. Franchise utilities have not charged themselves
for station power service under their retail tariffs nor have they used such
tariffs to charge other utilities with generation facilities in their retail
service territory. "Even today, these same utilities continue to treat
station power as net/negative generation for their own and other favored
generation facilities," said the filing. "At the same time, these utilities
are trying to unilaterally impose retail tariffs and rates on station power
service for their divested generation. But these divested generation assets
are the exact same facilities for which the utilities have historically
treated station power as net/negative generation."
As evidenced by the historical practice of netting station power, the NRG
entities first cited a 1972 start-up agreement between Central Hudson,
Consolidated Edison of New York and Niagara Mohawk (joint owners of the
Roseton generating facility in Central Hudson's exclusive retail service
area) providing that start-up power (a component of station power) obtained
from Central Hudson should be netted against output before net generation was
allocated among them. Second, the New York Power Pool Agreement (approved by
FERC in 1991) similarly allowed the netting of station power for members with
generation facilities in the exclusive retail service territories of other
members. Third, transition energy sales agreements between Con Edison and NRG
(concerning NRG's recent purchase of two divested generation facilities from
Con Edison) explicitly authorized the treatment of station power as
net/negative generation. These assignments were accepted by the Commission as
part of the process to obtain approval for the divestiture of jurisdictional
assets. In the PJM market, the petition noted (1) a recent filing by PJM
Interconnection L.L.C. (ER00-3513) revising its open-access transmission
tariff (OATT) and Operating Agreement to make clear that the historical
practice of netting station power service against gross generation should
continue even after the utilities divested most of their generation; and (2)
recent interconnection agreements filed by Conectiv, in conjunction with a
request seeking FERC approval to divest jurisdictional assets to affiliates
of NRG, expressly treating station power as negative generation. Finally, the
NRG petition observed, the Commission has approved market rules of the New
England ISO recognizing that market participants have the option of netting
station power.
Thus, the NRG entities concluded, the Commission-approved arrangements and
historical practices in New York, PJM and New England all show that station
power has been and continues to be treated as net/negative generation. "These
arrangements also demonstrate that utilities such as Niagara Mohawk and Con
Edison -- the same utilities that are now trying to impose retail tariffs on
their divested generation --benefitted from prior netting arrangements right
up until the time these assets were divested. These same utilities are
currently allowing their own retained and other favored generation to net at
the same time they are trying to force the divested generation to pay for
such station power under retail tariffs." Moreover, the petition added, the
historical practice of netting is consistent with the Commission's repeated
statement that "load is not served at a generating unit" through transmission
or interconnection assets.
The petition requested that FERC confirm its prior rulings and declare that
NRG's generation facilities have the right and option to treat station power
as negative generation to be netted against gross generation. This
declaration would recognize that the historical practice of netting station
power is still the most efficient means of ensuring that all generators have
equal access to essential station power in a market-based system. In other
words, "nothing in a competitive market suddenly transforms station power
into a retail event."
By declaring that station power as negative generation is a scheduled service
available under the Commission's pro forma tariff, the petition contended,
the Commission will further the public's interest in a competitive energy
market and, simultaneously, "preempt the type of discriminatory and
anti-competitive conduct that necessitated this petition in the first place,"
namely, efforts by utilities such as Niagara Mohawk to impose retail tariff
rates on station power service to divested assets while still allowing their
own retained generation facilities (and other favored facilities) to net
station power. Including station power service in pro forma tariffs would not
only provide generators with a service necessary to operation of their
interconnected facility but would also ensure availability of the service to
all generators on fair and nondiscriminatory terms, the petition added.
Furthermore, the NRG entities said the Commission has and should exercise
jurisdiction over station power issues. Since generating facilities cannot be
operated without station power, the petition explained, the provision of
station power "affects or relates to" the generator's ability to produce and
sell electric power in wholesale markets. Thus, the provision of station
power is "an integral and essential part" of the interconnection and
operation of that generator. "The Commission's jurisdiction therefore easily
extends to the provision of station power and supports the issuance of a
declaratory order ensuring that station power is made available to all
generators on efficient, nondiscriminatory terms as part of a pro forma
tariff."
Based on the above discussion, the petition requested FERC to issue an order
declaring that Niagara Mohawk cannot impose its unbundled retail tariff on
NRG's generation facilities. However, the petition made clear, the requested
declaration -- like the OATT revisions proposed recently by PJM -- would not
prohibit any generator form voluntarily agreeing to take station power under
a retail tariff. "It is the option to take station power as a scheduled
service under the pro form tariff that is important. By mandating this
choice, the Commission will ensure that utilities cannot take advantage of a
generator's need for station power."
The Commission should further declare, given its exclusive jurisdiction over
the wholesale energy market, that Niagara Mohawk cannot use state law
self-help remedies such as disconnection or termination of station power to
force payment from a wholesale generator. Any attempt to rely on state law
procedures is clearly preempted by the Commission's exclusive jurisdiction,
NRG said. Finally, since both NRG and the public will suffer irreparable harm
if Niagara Mohawk is allowed to terminate station power service and shut down
the generation facilities in question, the Commission should issue an interim
order prohibiting Niagara Mohawk from terminating station power service until
these proceedings have been completed.


Just FYI.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Montovano, Steve
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:28 AM
To:	Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:	RE: Expense Report

Ginger - Per your request:
1)  I charged Enron for this portion of my trip since I was going to NJ, Albany, and Md. to clean out each of those offices before they were closed of documents and personal items. I did not charge Enron fro my flight to iah from cmh.
2) Doubletree Hotel - I did meet with Steffes on that Monday regarding a NY PSC Order regarding certain EES natural gas accounts.  I did not charge Enron for any other expenses while in iah.
3) I met with Dan & Tom over dinner to get a download on their activities prior to their layoffs.  They met with me after the had been laid off on their own personal time.
4) I met with gary Alexander also to get a download of activity from him.  Since I drove to Md.to save airfare and didn't get there until the evening I met with Gary for a late dinner.
5) I went to the NJ BPU meeting on 12/12 because the BPU was meeting with respect to EES's customers in NJ and whether Enron would be allowed to continue to serve those customers.  While in the area I also met with the NY PSC regarding the same matter. I only spent the night and incurred a hotel charge because my evening flight back to cmh was cancelled.

In the future I will not be traveling on Enron business unless directed/approved in advance.  Should you have any additional q's regarding this matter please call me. I keep getting "kicked off" email with the dial up.  Thanks Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Montovano, Steve
Subject:	Expense Report

Steve,

Before we can finalize your expense report, you need to elaborate on the following:

1)  Houston/Newark/Newark/Columbus - Why is Enron paying for the Houston/Newark portion of this trip?  It was our understanding that you were here for an interview.
2)  Doubletree Hotel - What Enron business did you conduct while here?
3)  Dinner with Tom & Dan?
4)  Gary Alexander dinner?
5)  NJ BPU mtg?

All these expenses have to go through the "Cash Committee" and we need to be prepared for any questions that they might have.  There is hardly any travel being conducted at this time so this is going to stick out like a sore thumb.  Help us out with the details of these expenses.

Thanks!!!!!!

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


Hi Carlos,

Here's the PSA I mentioned.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001 04:11
PM ---------------------------

Scott Churbock
02/20/2001 09:20 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: MSA

Here is Trinity's MSA for your review.  Thank you for looking this over.  Let
me know how you would like to proceed.

Scott

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Churbock/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001
09:16 AM ---------------------------

Steve_Ramsey@trinityconsultants.com on 02/16/2001 02:31:55 PM
To: scott.churbock@enron.com
cc:

Subject: MSA

Scott, attached is a template that we have for master service agreements.
Take and look and see what you think.

Steve

(See attached file: MSA Template.doc)

 - MSA Template.doc


Below are the international lawyers who need to be notified of form changes.
Notify them only when forms are completed (not as they might be evolving).
Also, they should be using the swap forms in the attorney bank, so they need
to know where they are located.

Justin Boyd, London
Edmund Cooper, London
Mark Elliott, London
Paul Simons, London
Peter Keohane, Calgary
Martin Rosell, Oslo
Matthis Lee, Singapore
David Minns, Australia
John Viverito, Japan


Dale,

What is your availability for a conference call with GE today?

Kay


what day?


I've attached some additional proposed edits using Track Changes.  The text
of the email referenced in paragraph 8 is as follows:

-----Original Message-----
From: Mario_H_Sarmiento@calpx.com [mailto:Mario_H_Sarmiento@calpx.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 4:05 PM
To: AEP@calpx.com; AEPC@calpx.com; AES@calpx.com; APS@calpx.com;
APSE@calpx.com; APX@calpx.com; AQPW@calpx.com; AVST@calpx.com;
BPA@calpx.com; CDWR@calpx.com; CLPS@calpx.com; CPPB@calpx.com;
CPS@calpx.com; CRGL@calpx.com; ECI@calpx.com; EESI@calpx.com;
EMMT@calpx.com; EPMI@calpx.com; EPPS@calpx.com; IPC@calpx.com;
LDWP@calpx.com; MEGA@calpx.com; MID1@calpx.com; MRC@calpx.com;
MSCC@calpx.com; NCPA@calpx.com; NEI@calpx.com; NES@calpx.com;
NEVP@calpx.com; PAC@calpx.com; PACM@calpx.com; PGAE@calpx.com;
PGE@calpx.com; PNM@calpx.com; PPLM@calpx.com; PRM@calpx.com;
PWX@calpx.com; RVSD@calpx.com; SCAL@calpx.com; SCEM@calpx.com;
SDGE@calpx.com; SEL@calpx.com; SMUD@calpx.com; SNCL@calpx.com;
SNLW@calpx.com; SPI@calpx.com; SPP@calpx.com; SRP@calpx.com;
TEMU@calpx.com; TEP@calpx.com; USPS@calpx.com; VERN@calpx.com;
WAPA@calpx.com; WESC@calpx.com
Cc: PX_DISTRIBUTION@calpx.com; Lisa_G_Urick@calpx.com
Subject: Notification to PX Participants

Participants:

Last Friday, January 26th, the Special and Correcting Invoices for the
Southern
California Edison (SCE) default were due and there were some Participants
who
failed to comply with Schedule 2. Section 4.3.2. of the PX Tariff which
states,
"All payments by the PX Participants shall be made to the PX Clearing
Account
via the Fedwire System for funds to be received at the PX Clearing Account
no
later than noon PPT on the Payment Due Date."

Additionally, Schedule 2, Section 5.5 of the PX Tariff requires the PX to
identify such Participants to all other affected PX Participants by the most
expeditious means available.  In accordance with Section 5.5, here is a list
of
PX Participants not in compliance with Section 4.3.2. for the SCE default:

   American Electric Power Service Corporation
   Arizona Public Service
   Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
   Pacific Gas & Electric
   Sacramento Municipal Utility District
   Salt River Project

Each PX Participant's pro-rata portion of the shortfall from the
Participants
mentioned above will be communicated to them individually in the next couple
of
days.  If you should have questions, please call Clark Cheng at 626-537-3243
or
Chris Anderson at 626-537-3377.

Thank You.

Richard C. Josephson
Stoel Rives LLP
900 SW Fifth  Avenue, Suite 2600
Portland, OR 97204-1268
DD: 503-294-9537
Fax: 503-220-2480
email: rcjosephson@stoel.com

 - complaint.doc


Mark,

The bigger issue is what are we going to do with EE&CC.  If their time is
coming and we need to split them up then I would agree with this but
otherwise I am not sure this is the best thing to do.  I have had very little
actual work with EE&CC in the past year and can't really comment on their
effectiveness.

mike

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
07:34 AM ---------------------------

Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/11/2000 01:24 AM
To: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Frevert@Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Delainey, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS

Larry:

This fundamentally changes the entire basis of our approach to EECC and the
way that the engineering organization works. The idea was that the
engineering expertise resides in EECC.If u want to change that, it requires a
broader discussion.

Larry L Izzo
09/08/2000 04:37 PM
To: Mark Frevert@Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Delainey, Rick Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS

In light of the lesson learned on Project Lightening and in view of the
recent CALME reorganization, I suggest we simplify the payroll structure for
Development Engineers (DE's).  Currently, the DE's listed below are still on
EECC's payroll, although they are direct-line support to the Regions/Business
Units.  I suggest that all DE's transfer from EECC's payroll to the Business
Units they are supporting.  Some DE's are already on the regions' payrolls  I
don't think this will have a budget impact, because at this time each region
below is paying the total costs for these engineers, through EECC invoices.
Please let me know if each of you agree and I will have HR do the payroll
switch.

CALME (from EECC to Enron Global Markets)
Ken Koye
Mario Brunasso
Alice Weekley
Hemmat Safwat
Steve Sauer
Dave Glessner
Michael Worthem
Saad Merhej
Marion Cole
Omar Aboudaher
Celia Delahoussaye
Jan Dunn
Joni Moeller

APACHE (none)

INDIA (from EECC to Enron India)
Ken Bean
John Belew
Ram Tarakad
Debbie Perrotta

ESA (from EECC to Enron SA)
John R. Ayres
Mel Schultze (contractor)
Joy Oliver

ENA (from EECC to ENA)
Mike Coleman
Sandy Morris
Terri Austin
Juan Suarez
Bob Chmielewski
Bruce Golden
Steve Rose

LI41400


I aim to please.  I'll pay you in my Enron stock options.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bill Wells" <bwells@pop.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:05 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	RE: Tickets

Your kind words and well wishes have moved me.  Try not to be so verbose.
BW

901 Brittany Drive
Lewisville, TX
75067

Bill Wells

Never be afraid to try something new.  Remember, amateurs built the ark.
Professionals built the Titanic.

-----Original Message-----
From: Giron, Darron C. [mailto:Darron.C.Giron@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:16 AM
To: bwells@pop.net
Subject: Tickets

14343 Millstone Estates Ln.
Cypress, TX  77429

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Jeff -  Thought you'd be interested.? Let's try for lunch next  week.
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Pocta, Robert M.  [mailto:rmp@cpuc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:28  AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA  and TURN for Modification of Decisi
on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et  al.

??????? Brian - This is a  copy of an emergency petition to modify the gas
accord decision that was filed  yesterday.? It basically requests that
penalties to core customers for  diversions be waived and any diversion be
priced at the market price up to $50  per dth.? Unfortunately, we felt it had
to be filed because we couldn't let  the core be exposed to $100 per Dth gas
supply when PG&E can't buy at $10  per dth.? Hopefully, the crisis will be
resolved and petition will have no  bearing.?

??????? It was mailed to the  Gas Accord service list and our legal division
e-mailed to an unknown service  list which I had wished they hadn't done. (We
are not trying to add to any  problem, but based on a worst case scenario we
couldn't have the core exposed to  buying $100 per dth gas for all its gas
supply)???

?

?

 - CPUC01-#87842-v1-emergency_petition_on_A9212043_.doc


I have received questions about interpreting the ratio.   Let me use yesterday's closing price.   The merger probability is derived from a two scenario test, merger closure or merger non closure (there is also a competing offer scenario in reality).    Let's use a closing DYN price of $46.20 yesterday (note I had a typo), at the exchange ratio, (not taking into account timing and dividends), this yields a merged ENE price of $12.40 ($46.20 * .2685).   ENE closed at $10.00 yesterday.   Thus if the market thought there was complete certainty of merger, the prices would converge at $12.40.

Now comes the artful part, the non merger ENE price.    I included another tab (Merger) to sensitize this.  Say we pick an ENE price with no merger of $4.00.   Looking at a deterministic probability, one can look at the distance (difference) in dollars to calculate the probability.  For instance:

ENE merged           12.40
ENE close 14-Nov   10.00
ENE no merger         4.00

Probability of merger = (1-((12.40-10.00) / (12.40 - 4.00))) or 71.4%.

Said another way, there is a 71.4% chance of being worth $12.40 and a 28.6% chance of being worth $4.00, which yields a weighted price of $10.00  ($12.40 * 71.4%)+($4.00 * 28.6%).

I also included a $1 distressed ENE price and a $7 previously observed low end ENE price as scenarios.

Regards,

Michael


Jim, stephanie will be in this morning, cannot do lunch, and we will be back to you by 12:00 our time to confirm the 4:00 pm conference call.

Thanks, BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Schoene, Jim [mailto:Jim.Schoene@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:27 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:

We have set up a conference bridge for the call tomorrow at 4:00.  It is
301-280-5125, pin 25#.

Do you have time to do lunch tomorrow?  Perhaps we could talk a little then,
or I could come over before the call and we could visit/strategize a bit
before the call.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040920.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


FYI.  Please call me on Monday to discuss, if possible.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/23/2001 08:19
AM ---------------------------

03/20/2001 03:35 PM
Shelby Malkemes
Shelby Malkemes
Shelby Malkemes
03/20/2001 03:35 PM
03/20/2001 03:35 PM
To: lorie.leigh@enron.com, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: north western documents


Hi Jamey,

Would you please let us know when the database (ERMTP) will be back up?  It's already 10AM.

Vladi needs access to the database asap.

Please let us know.

Thanks

Franky Sulistio
Sr. IT Specialist
Enron Networks
Ph.(713) 345-3611
Email: franky.sulistio@Enron.com

?	"Success hinges on a passion for excellence."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

May 18, 2001 5:00pm through May 21, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:30:00 PM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at    9:30:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  5:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Upgrade IOS on ENEFW4
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: The new code has bug fixes and stateful failover feature.
Backout: Revert back to old IOS.
Contact(s):  John Shupak          713-853-7943
  Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s):  Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 5/18/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 5/18/2001 at  11:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Wed 5/16/2001 at  4:45:00 PM CT thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  4:45:00 PM CT
 Wed 5/16/2001 at  2:45:00 PM PT thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  2:45:00 PM PT
 Wed 5/16/2001 at  10:45:00 PM London thru Wed 5/23/2001 at  10:45:00 PM
London
Outage:  Market Data Cable Management EB3460
Environments Impacted:  All Trading Groups
Purpose: Improve computer room environment.  Perform cable management in
order to comply with computer room standards.
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  Corp, OTS, ETS
DATE:  MAY 29, 2001/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM
Outage:  Migrate DSS Server to GTHOU-APPSQ03P
Environments Impacted:  DSS users will not be able to access the old server
(ENEDS01_ADAPT)after this date
Purpose: The existing server is outdated, migrating to SQL 2000 provides
increased
functionality and conforms to database platform requirements.
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mary Vollmer          713-853-3381
  Joe Hellsten           713-853-7346      713-545-4164

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at    8:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Moving Production Database TDSPROD
Environments Impacted:  ENA
Purpose: This database is being moved to give the space it is currently using
to the Enpower database on that server.  The new server Refraction will also
allow TDSPROD to expand as well.
Backout: The old instance will be restarted and the TNSNAMES.ORA entry will
be changed to point at the old instance.
Contact(s):  John Jahnke    713-345-4398

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at   10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 5/20/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Resource addition for server moe.
Environments Impacted:  Sitara, PEP, Global
Purpose: Server is memory and cpu constrained.
Backout: Shutdown the server and revert to old configuration.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:   Also see above
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 5/19/2001 at   2:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 5/19/2001 at   10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 5/19/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Resource additionto Sitara server aurora.
Environments Impacted:  Sitara production
Purpose: Add needed cpu and memory.
Backout: Remove the newly added resources and restart under the old config.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 5/18/2001 at  3:00:00 PM thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  11:45:00 PM
Outage:  Unify Power Production Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Infrastructure required maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s):  Brian Ripley          713-345-4709
  Charles Ballmer    713-853-0684
  Bob Ward              713-345-4409

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: Australia
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 19-May-2001 at  10:00:00 AM Sydney thru Sat 19-May-2001 at 3:00:00
PM Sydney
 Sat 19-May-2001 at  1:00:00 AM GMT (London) thru Sat 19-May-2001 at  6:00:00
AM GMT (London)
 Fri 5/19/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT (Houston) thru Sun 5/20/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
CT (Houston)
 Fri 5/19/2001 at 5:00:00 PM PT (Portland)  thru Sat 5/19/2001 at  10:00:00
PM PT (Portland)
Outage: Sydney UPS Test & Service
Environments Impacted:  Corp Sydney - all systems
Purpose: Original UPS needs testing & service. Will require Server Room to be
de-powered to allow maintenance.
Backout: Plug equipment into unconditioned power.
Contact(s):  Colin Wood    +61-416-248-353
  Elliott Katz +61-292-292-309

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010404.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:  13.87 / Final:  13.84)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/4/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
WASHINGTON _ House, upset at ouster of U.S. from rights panel, votes to
withold some U.N. dues.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 09:39
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           07/12/2000 08:21 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

New Power Company will be formally taking over the CES-Retail Agreement
effective 7/31/00.  Who should be responsible for changing all the deals in
Sitara to correctly reflect the new arrangement?    Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
08:19 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Mark Breese                           07/10/2000 06:46 PM

To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 06:45
PM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                07/10/2000 06:45 PM

To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

Mark:
I received a notice in the mail in connection with Columbia Energy Services
Corporation's sale of its "Mass Markets" business to The New Power Company.
The purpose of the notice was to inform us that effective July 31, 2000
Columbia would be assigning its interest in the January 30, 1998 ISDA Master
Agreement that it has with ENA to New Power as well as all transactions under
it.  Please call me if you have any questions about this.  I expect that we
will receive shortly a formal consent agreement.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Here is what you have all been waiting for the new and improved C/P list.

ENJOY!


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
02:05 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 05/24/2001 03:02:16 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - May2001ExpenseReport

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Cindy K. Olson
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: May2001ExpenseReport
Report Total: $7,759.81
Amount Due Employee: $7,759.81

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Ava has received several RSVP's for the meeting, but the hotel has not received many calls for rooms.  Ava is trying to determine if the rooms still need to be blocked-out.  She will call the customers for us if we would provide the phone #'s to her.

Could you please fill in the phone #'s for your accounts and forward to Ava Garcia?

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Garcia, Ava
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	ASAP


I will most likely not be able to attend.  However, my comment relating to
this issue was a generalization of confidentiality clauses I've used on other
interconnect agreements and other contracts, including the "model"
interconnection agreement recently submitted to FERC by EPSA.  In essence,
the issue is that the utility should not have the unilateral right to
disclose any information to anyone they want that is sent to them in
connection with a DG interconnection.  This would include ownership, facility
output, markets for energy or capacity or ancillary sevices (if any) and
maintenance schedules (these schedules may be coincident with a retail
customer's facility maintenance schedule which itself may be confidential
information between the generator and retail customer).  This information is
potentially competitive and should be held confidential.  Potential wording
for a simplified confidentiality section would be as follows:

"Unless compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative process or other
provisions of law or as otherwise provided for in this Rule, the Electic
Provider shall hold in confidence any and all documents and information
furnished by the Electric Customer in connection with the interconnection,
provide however, that to the extent it is necessary for the the EP to release
or disclose such information to a third party in order to perform the EP's
obligation herein, EP shall advise said third party of the confidential
provisons of this Rule and use its best efforts to require said third party
to agree in writing to comply with such provisions."

Bruno Gaillard
04/20/2000 11:47 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Tom Hoatson/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Siting Committee Hearing - Interconnection Rules

Scott Tomashefsky is asking me to present our position on the confidentiality
clause in Rule 21 at the CEC Hearing on 4/25. Any thoughts. I hope to be able
to respond to him today.

Should an Enron rep be present to do so? Me or another?
Bob are you coming to Sacramento?

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 04/20/2000
09:41 AM ---------------------------

"Scott Tomashefsky" <Stomashe@energy.state.ca.us> on 04/20/2000 07:26:24 AM
To: bgaillar@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Siting Committee Hearing

Bruno,

I was wondering if you would be willing to speak for 5-10 minutes on Tuesday
regarding Section 2.7 of the proposed Rule 21 language (confidentiality of
information)?  I was hoping you could convey your concerns for the Committee.
We have also added language in the report stating the Energy Commission has
previously urged positions similar to Enron's at the CPUC, but the CPUC has
not accepted them.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience.

Scott


Vince,
It was a pleasure talking with you earlier today. Please read the documents I
have attached with this email. Let's talk in the near future to continue our
conversation. I am very confident that my team and I can be successful
regarding any staffing need you have.? I will give Sheila in HR a call and
see if we can work out a contract. Please visit our web site for up-to-date
information at http://www.mrportland.com
Thank you for your time and have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Johan Dahl
Director Energy Staffing Group
Phone: 1-503-287-8701 ext. 1153
Email: jdahl@mrportland.com

 - JCD-Client Broch-Energy #2.doc
 - Charter of Ethical Practice.doc


Yes, so long as they are employees and not on contract.  Move them to Lance Schuler's group.  Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mayes, Fran
Sent:	Saturday, August 04, 2001 12:05 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	EBS Transfers

	Mark, can you confirm that you approve these legal employees transfer from EBS legal to EWS legal?  I will need to determine which
	legal team they should transfer to.

EWS - Mark Haedicke
Cooper, Tracy
Garner, Joanne
Harkness, Cynthia
Hicks, Michelle
Hill, Robin
Rossi, Roberta

EWS - Mark Haedicke - Portland / Sheila Tweed
Merten, Eric

Fran Mayes
HR Manager
Phone (713) 853-7211
Fax (713) 646-8100
Cell/Pager  713 875-3820 or
7138753820@messaging.nextel.com


Cheryl,

Per your voice mail message, the attached Tejas Interconnect Agreement with
the price cap provision added to Section 3 of the Agreement.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Pretty funny.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           11/13/2000 10:09 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           11/13/2000 08:43 AM

To: kristi.giron@cfisd.net
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
08:43 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
11/10/2000 03:52 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Lorenz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 03:52 PM
---------------------------

"Vance, Norman" <NVance@hess.com> on 11/10/2000 03:28:15 PM
To: "Greg Couch (E-mail)" <Greg.Couch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play

Friday, November 10, 2000
IN THE NEWS..."Kids Find Contested Ballot to be Child's Play,"
The Shreveport Times, by Don Walker

"It's a ballot that perplexed Florida voters but was no match for the wits
of first- and fourth-graders at Stockwell Elementary School in Bossier City.

"Disillusioned and upset by the lingering chaos of this week's presidential
election, fourth-grade teacher Lisa Burns pulled a sample of the
controversial Palm Beach County, Fla., ballot off the Internet on Thursday.
She then put her class of 9- and 10-year-olds to the test.  'I gave them a
ballot and had them take a blue marker to vote for Al Gore and a red marker
to vote for George Bush. Then I had them put their name on the bottom of the
ballot and turn it in.'

"Turns out this election was mere child's play. Not one of the 22 students
present in class Thursday was confused by the ballot. Each one was marked
without error.

"Well, if a fourth-grader could do it, how about a first-grader? Down the
hall in Stacey Robinson's class, the ballot was handed out to 6- and
7-year-olds. Robinson used an overhead projector to point out Gore's name,
then asked the class of 24 students to find his bubble on the punch-card
ballot.

"'It wasn't a vote,' Robinson said. 'I just wanted to experiment to see if
they could find the correct bubble.'

"When the ballots were turned in, 19 of the first-graders marked the correct
bubble for Gore, three picked Buchanan's bubble, one picked Bush's and one
marked the bottom bubble for the 'Natural Law' party.

"'If a first-grader can choose the correct bubble, there's no legitimate
claim. Anyone could have done it,' Robinson said. 'A grown adult who took
any time at all could find it.'

"Still, even in a first-grade classroom, vote tabulations were the subject
of protest and controversy. 'I thought we were voting,' Brady McCoy, 6, of
Haughton grumbled after he was told to find and punch the 'Gore' bubble. 'I
wanted to vote for George Bush!'"


All testing was completed successfully.


The date is set for Sept. 21st. The friday before will be great. I am going this weekend or the next to the tux shops to find out what all the details will be. I will let you know as soon as possible. I'm really just getting started so tell Ashley if she has any suggestions to please let me know. I have checked into the botanical gardens and the hsv museum of art for holding the ceremony but I need someone like a wedding corodinator to tell us what to do, you know the church you get married at usually has one and she tells you the night of the rehearsal dinner. By having it somewhre else I dont really have that person. I am glad that you want to be a part of the wedding. I do think that Jackson will be the cutest little man in tux.  talk to you later  B


Marianne, i forwarded this email to Chris Germany and he will talk to Brian.\

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/18/2000 07:51:53 AM
To: " - *joann.collins@enron.com" <joann.collins@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: CMD8 19-32

I need an additional 400 dth for the month @ meter #19-32.   (If we start it
on
the 20th it divides evenly, your choice).   Please let me know k# when it is
available.


Have we set something up w/ Wickliff and Hall yet?