----- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 10/30/2000 02:59 PM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	10/30/2000 02:53 PM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
<sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: EPSA Motion for Cease and Desist

Attached is EPSA's emergency motion for an immediate issuance of a cease and
desist order for the Cal ISO to implement price caps, filed today.  Also
attached is EPSA's press release regarding the filing.
If you will be sending an individual letter to FERC Chairman James J. Hoecker
supporting EPSA's arguments, please be sure to file the letter in the docket
and servce the service list (approx. 200+ individuals).  If you need help
obtaining a copy of the service list, please contact Jackie Gallagher at
202-789-7200 or jgallagher@epsa.org.

Attachments

 - cal cease and desist.doc
 - Oct30calpricecaps.doc


Firms want off grid
Companies wish to deal directly with utilities and avoid helping state foot
the bill.
June 15, 2001
By KATE BERRY
The Orange County Register
California's business community is locked in a battle with energy regulators
and lawmakers about how deregulation will ultimately pan out - and whether
companies will be stuck paying most of the tab for the state's electricity
crisis.
Business groups want to continue down the road toward deregulation. They are
lobbying politicians to pass legislation that would let companies buy
electricity directly from power suppliers, bypassing the state's regulated
utilities.
"In our hearts, we still believe we can make this a competitive market and
get some cost savings,'' said Bill Dombrowski, president of the California
Retailers Association, which represents 9,000 stores in the state, including
Home Depot, Target and Albertson's.
But Gov. Gray Davis' foray into long-term contracts, agreeing to pay $43
billion over 10 to 20 years for power, could squash that ambition.
The state's Public Utilities Commission delayed a proposal June 7 to restrict
companies from signing so-called "direct access" contracts with power
providers. Regulators are expected to rule on the proposal next week.
The debate over direct access is at the heart of a complicated attempt to
solve California's costly power crisis.
It will determine whether businesses, with residential customers, pay for the
bulk of the state's future energy purchases. It also could determine whether
Southern California Edison, the state's cash-strapped No. 2 utility, will
avoid bankruptcy - and whether deregulation will survive in any form.
"The governor got it exactly wrong,'' said Peter Navarro, an economics
professor at the University of California, Irvine, who is running for the San
Diego City Council. "The long-term contract strategy is a de facto
re-regulation of the market because it eliminates the ability of industrial
customers to bargain for a lower price.''
Direct access was a key component of the 1996 deregulation law, designed to
break the monopoly of California's utilities. Under this concept, all
customers could directly access an energy provider other than their regulated
utility - just as they pick a long-distance phone company.
Currently, 11,000 businesses and government entities have direct access, as
well as about 77,000 residential customers - but some energy service
providers, such as Enron Corp., are dropping their residential customers.
Direct access is at the center of the latest Edison bailout plan, sponsored
by Assembly Speaker Pro Tem Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek. Under the plan, the
3,600 largest businesses would agree to pay $3.1 billion of Edison's debts
over 15 years. In exchange, businesses would be allowed to secure their own
power contracts by 2003.
But energy regulators may not let companies off the hook at such a bargain
price.
David Gamson, an energy adviser to PUC Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown, said
regulators are concerned that if businesses flee the system, the state will
be stuck with too much electricity under long-term electricity contracts
through 2021. That would mean residential ratepayers would be stuck paying
the bulk of the $43 billion in future power costs.
Complicating the issue is Wall Street. The state's bankers, led by J.P.
Morgan, are nervous about selling as much as $13.4 billion in planned state
bonds if businesses - now the largest ratepayers in the state after
governments - find a way out of the system. The bonds are meant to repay the
state for $8.2 billion in power-buying costs so far this year and to cover
some future costs.
Business and residential electricity customers would repay the bonds through
a surcharge on their utility bills. If businesses are allowed to sign on with
outside energy providers, that revenue stream would be in jeopardy.
"We have companies now that want to get below-cost power from the state, but
when the market turns, they want to leave,'' said Lawrence Lingbloom, chief
policy adviser on energy to Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Marina del Rey. "Remaining
customers would be left with those costs, and it would create a death spiral
for the revenue stream.''
Consumer groups oppose direct access because it would allow businesses to
avoid paying most of the costs of the energy crisis.
"Direct access is a policy that should be dead because it's a key adjunct to
deregulation,'' said Doug Heller of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights in Santa Monica. "But right now, it's a policy that's driving all the
deals.''
Even as regulators and consumer groups try to snuff out direct access,
business groups are lobbying to save it - with the help of key legislators.
Two bills, one sponsored by Bowen, who heads the Senate energy committee, and
a second by Assemblyman Dave Kelley, R-Hemet, would rescind language in
previous legislation that gave the Public Utilities Commission authority to
block direct access.
Both proposals would require businesses to pay the state an "exit fee.''
Those fees haven't yet been determined, but they would include a surcharge or
a complicated calculation in which businesses would pay a percentage of
future energy purchases.
Companies say they don't want to pay.
"Direct access has allowed businesses to enter fixed- price contracts to get
stable rates,'' said Shawn Covell, senior manager for governmental affairs at
Qualcomm Inc. in San Diego. "It's really unfair when you have businesses that
have taken their time to protect themselves, to punish them.''
Qualcomm, which makes telecommunications equipment, saw its energy bills
double to $6 million last year. The company signed a contract with an energy
service provider, Strategic Energy in Carlsbad, and capped its rates.
Otherwise, Covell said, its electricity costs would have doubled again this
year.
Sweetwater Union High School District in Chula Vista is a direct-access
customer. The district, with 35,000 students, spends about $2 million a year
on energy, said Jim Clark, its energy manager. His district won a "watchdog
award'' for efficiency from the San Diego County Taxpayers' Association
because it locked in lower rates.
When Gov. Gray Davis announced in January that the state would begin signing
long-term contracts, Clark extended the district's contract through 2006 at
11 cents per kilowatt-hour - enabling it to save $1 million a year, he said.
"As soon as Davis made the announcement, we knew the market was going to
move,'' he said. "The market only changes when people buy. When the state of
California steps to the plate, the price goes to the moon.''
Davis has maintained that the long-term contracts between the state and power
suppliers helped bring down high spot market prices in recent weeks by
removing demand from that market.
But Clark and others who want to go the direct-access route fear the
government will force businesses to pay for all the costs of the energy
crisis, including rate increases of 38 percent to 49 percent, plus surcharges
to pay off $13.4 billion in forthcoming state bonds.
"Businesses will be required to pay for the mistakes that the governor and
the Legislature have made,'' he said. "Who else is going to pay for it?
Ultimately, it will fall on the heads of all consumers.''
Register staff writer Hanh Kim Quach contributed to this report.


whats up

i just got this msg from you

hey so i did about what you suggested by accident!

hope you had fun

john k said you enjoyed Gerald's company so let me send you his email ill
send him yours to i always want my friends to be come friend s with each
other

heck, ill just send this one to Gerald also now

gerald i was writing to sophie to say she had good recipe advice, then
remembered you 2 talking here's each other's emails if they don't come
through lemme know guys

tomorrow night is a killer party night here gerald if you wanna come down

sophie you come out with the gang ok? i might see you tonight i'll probalby
be hanging out with John K & he has a law school party to go to

hey i just realized you guys are both lawyers

birds of a feather

----- Original Message -----
From: "Max Miller" <maxk@austin.rr.com>
To: "Mark Miller" <MMILLER3@austin.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 3:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Trifle

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sophie Davenport" <sophiedavenport@hotmail.com>
> To: <mmiller3@austin.rr.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:39 AM
> Subject: Trifle
>
>
> > Not sure if the last one sent properly!
> >
> > A trifle is a dessert - v. olde Englishe!
> >
> > Basically it's sponge on the bottom usually soaked with a bit of sherry
> (or
> > quite a lot of sherry depending on how drunk you plan to get!) then
fruits
> > on top of that, such as raspberries, peaches, blackcurrents,
strawberries,
> > cherries (possibly) and then you pour on custard (best made not from the
> > tin) and then whipped cream and then you can put a topping on top like
> > flaked almonds, or chocolate shavings etc.
> >
> > Roast is like a huge joint of meat - you can roast chicken or the big
> > English classic is Roast Beef and Yorkshire Puddings (made from a
pancake
> > batter type mix). Served with roast potatoes and vegetables.
> > (Sorry the description isn't as impressive or articulate as you might
find
> > on a menu - i've yet to study for my chef qualification!)
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
>


Here is the link for the load data on the CA ISO's web site.  Although the
ISO has some time limit on keeping data, it goes back at least as far as Jan
'01.  We didn't check any earlier.  Feel free to call with any questions.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/20/2001 04:45 PM -----

	Dave Perrino@ECT
	07/20/2001 03:00 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: CAISO Historic Load Data

Sue,

From this link: http://oasis.caiso.com/ the information your are looking for
can be obtained.  Once the CA ISO OASIS homepage comes up, click on the
"System Load" tab in the upper righthand corner, this will bring you to the
"System Load Reports" page.  From this page you can query the ISO's database.
 From trying to query the data, I have found out that you can request no more
than 31 days of data at a time.

Hope this helps, any questions, just let me know.

Kind Regards,

Dave


Rhino here.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wood, George
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM
To:	'ramoor@pplweb.com'; 'DAYANNARELL@PPLWEB.COM'
Subject:	Indicative Enron Proposal for Wallingford

Roland and David

I am attaching the Enron response to your RFP of October 4, 2001.  This proposal is indicative and confidential.  We would be most pleased to discuss this proposal or other approaches/modifications with you.

thank you

Woody


Kate, this trade has an expiry date of 2001 when it is suppose to be 2003.
Mike Driskil entered the trade. I have BPA's confirm that also verifies and
the notes in the bottom of the comment section. Please change if correct.

Thanks,

Kimberly


Yuck!  Some of this looked spooky.  Baseball tickets:  you and your buddy
Maureen go to the game on Tuesday, June 6th.  I believe the Astro's play MIN.


Please let me know if "E" calls so I can enlighten you on the possibilities.

Have a Good weekend !!!!!

dp

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


See correction below
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ann.s.chen@accenture.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Lewis, Andrew H.
Subject:	Calculating transportation per MMBtu --- I think I got it

Is the formula for calculating transport cost:

cost of gas at receipt*(1/(1- fuel ratio)) + commodity charge?

----- Forwarded by Ann S. Chen/Internal/Accenture on 11/15/2001 12:12 PM
-----

            Ann S. Chen
                                         To:     Andrew.h.lewis@enron.com
            11/15/2001 11:44 AM          cc:
                                         Subject:     Calculating transportation per MMBtu

Andy --

I have a couple of questions as I dive more into the details of figuring
out transportation costs. Still trying to figure out how you make your
decision whether to transport or not.  You compare the cent spread between
the Amarillo(offer) and Chicago basis(bid)+Nicor Index(bid) versus the
transportation cost.  In the numbers you provided in your example, the
spread was 12 cents.  I'm still confused as to how you compute the
transportation cost to compare that spread with. The fuel ratio you
specified was 3.19% and the commodity was $0.0167.

Thanks,
Ann

----- Forwarded by Ann S. Chen/Internal/Accenture on 11/15/2001 11:31 AM
-----

            Ann S. Chen
                                         To:     Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com
            11/14/2001 06:00 PM          cc:
                                         Subject:     Transportation Scenario Update

Hi Andy --

Thanks for helping us understand the tranportation and storage problem
today. We appreciate your patience. I know it's like teaching a baby how to
walk!

Anyway, just wanted to get you the updated numbers for the transportation
scenario, based on the changes you made at teh meeting today.  Can you also
double check with Philip regarding the issue with hedging Basis with
regards to transportation?

Have a great weekend!

Thanks!
Ann

(See attached file: Transportation.doc)

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
 - Transportation.doc << File: Transportation.doc >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Bautista, Larry L." <Larry.Bautista@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bautista+2C+20Larry+20L+2E+22+20+3CLarry+2EBautista+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	AMY GOLD; AMY SHERIDAN; BARBARA JOST; BARBARA WHITTAKER; BILL LANSINGER; BRUCE CONNELL; CARLA JOHNSON; CATHY BULF; CHRIS SCHINDLER; CRAIG CHANCELLOR; CRAIG LIPKE; CURT BRECHTE; CYNTHIA CORCORAN; DAVE KIRKLAND; DAVID HUARD; DEBBIE SWANSTORM; DEBORAH CARPENTIER; DIANE MCVICKER; DIANE TOM; DONALD G. AVERY; DONNA FULTON; DOUG CANTER; DOUG JOHN; DOUGLAS K. PORTER; ED ROSS; ELISABETH R. MYERS-KERBAL; ELISSA J. GRAMMER; ELIZABETH ZERBY; ELLEN SCHALL; FRANK GURLEY; FRANK LINDH; FREDERICK T. KOLB; GARY DUEDE; GARY VENZ; GEORGETTA BAKER; GORDON SMITH; GREG LANDER; HAROLD ORNDORFF; INGRID OLSON; JACK CASHIN; JAMES MCGREW; JAMES MORIARTY; JAMES TRIFON; Tholt, Jane M.; JANICE ALWARD; JANICE E. ROGERS; JAY GOLUB; JEFF E. PARKER; JEFF GOFORTH; JIM ADAMS; JIM DOERING; JOEL L. GREENE; JOHN COGAN; JOHN FLOOM; JOHN GREGG; JOHN P. ARMATO; JOHN P. BEALL; JOHN R. LILYESTROM; JOHN R. STAFFIER; Jonathan Bromson; JOSEPH S. KOURY; JUNE SUWARA; KARILEE RAMALEY; KATHIE EDWARDS; KATHLEEN L. MAZURE; KELLY A. DALY; KENT PRICE; KIM M. CLARK; KIRBY BOSLEY; KURT L. KRIEGER; L.W. SMITH; LARRY BLACK; LAURIE J. HAMILTON; LINDSEY HOW-DOWNING; LUIS MANUEL PADILLA; MARK FENTON; MELISSA MAXWELL; MIKE LANGSTON; MIKE MCELRATH; NORMAN PEDERSEN; PATRICK NEVINS; Paul B. Mohler; PAUL GENDRON; PAUL KEELER; PAULA CRUNKILTON; PEDRO SERRANO, JR.; PENNY BARRY; PERRY BROWN; PETE FROST; PETER CERVIN; RANDALL RICH; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; ROB DAVIS; ROBERT GRAY; ROBERT HEWLETT; ROBERT PETROCELLI; ROBERT PETTINATO; SALLE E. YOO; SANDRA E. RIZZO; SANDRA ROVETTI; SARAH TOMALTY; SCOTT MERTZ; SCOTT WALTON; SEAN BREEN; SHARON ROYKA; STEVE LEVINE; STEVE TARPEY; SUSAN GINSBERG; SUSAN JONES; TED MCMURTRIE; TERRI DICKERSON; THOMAS CUBBAGE; TIM MILLER; TOM CARLSON; VIRGIL SPURGEON
Cc:	Tomlinson, Robert T.; Derryberry, Richard L.; McCleskey, Michael L.; Healy, William
Subject:	RP00-336 Data Responses

Attached below are El Paso's responses to the data requests resulting from
the capacity allocation technical conference held on August 28, 2001.

 <<Citizens Ltr.doc>>  <<Citizens No. 1.xls>>  <<Citizens No. 2.xls>>
<<Enron 01.xls>>  <<Enron Ltr.doc>>  <<EPMCG Ltr.doc>>  <<FERC1 ltr.doc>>
<<Staff No. 01.xls>>  <<Ind. Shippers Ltr.doc>>  <<PNM ltr..doc>>  <<PNM No.
01.xls>>  <<SRP ltr..doc>>  <<SRP No. 05.doc>>  <<SRP No. 13.xls>>  <<SWG
ltr..doc>>  <<SWG No. 5.xls>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - Citizens Ltr.doc
 - Citizens No. 1.xls
 - Citizens No. 2.xls
 - Enron 01.xls
 - Enron Ltr.doc
 - EPMCG Ltr.doc
 - FERC1 ltr.doc
 - Staff No. 01.xls
 - Ind. Shippers Ltr.doc
 - PNM ltr..doc
 - PNM No. 01.xls
 - SRP ltr..doc
 - SRP No. 05.doc
 - SRP No. 13.xls
 - SWG ltr..doc
 - SWG No. 5.xls


Bob,

My husband and I will continue to keep Michael in our prayers.  By the way, I
really appreciate your updates.

I'm eligible to give blood again, so let me know when Michael needs more
donations.

Kay


FYI.  Finally the Chairman speaks the truth.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 12:25 PM -----

	Mary Hain@ECT
	01/19/2001 05:45 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: In formal, opinion Hoecker calls for FERC to enjoin California
state action

I wonder if a court would give this any credence?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 03:51 PM
---------------------------

Alan Comnes
01/19/2001 12:58 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, mhain@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Hoecker's Last Word:Calif Must Adopt 'Realistic' Pwr Plan

Nice final flame!

Hoecker's Last Word:Calif Must Adopt 'Realistic' Pwr Plan

01/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- California officials have shown "bald disregard" for
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authority and are pursuing short-sighted
policies that will push the state's two largest utilities over the brink and
into bankruptcy, FERC Chairman James Hoecker said Thursday.

The remarks by Hoecker, who resigned as chairman effective Thursday, came in
a highly unusual formal opinion in what represents his blistering last words
on the rapidly unraveling power crisis in California.

Hoecker lambasted Gov. Gray Davis and state policymakers for allowing the
state's power crisis to finally succumb to rolling blackouts.

State officials ignored the commission's Dec. 15 market-restructuring order
and instead embraced "conspiracy theories, resistance to more realistic
rates, and calls for palliative price caps...to obscure the issues and delay
solutions," Hoecker said.

White House-brokered negotiations to develop power-supply contracts as part
of a near-term solution are at an impasse due to "unrealistic" demands by
Gov. Davis that power providers agree to contracts at rates below their cost
of production, Hoecker said.

He further called for Davis and lawmakers to relent in their unrealistic
position that retail rates continue to be frozen at below-present-cost,
pre-1996 levels.

Unless state officials agree to pursue realistic policies, Edison
International's Southern California Edison Co. (EIX) and PG&E Corp.'s Pacific
Gas & Electric Co. (PCG), will be pushed into bankruptcy by following the
state's flawed market-restructuring law, Hoecker said.

"Perhaps bankruptcy can be averted. If it cannot, perhaps it will force
debtors, creditors and state officials to address the financial problems of
utilities in a new light, without recrimination and posturing," he said.

"Let's be realistic," Hoecker said. "Wall Street and consumers share one
critical trait: Without a reasonable, technically defensible and
comprehensive set of solutions to such crises, they have no basis for
confidence that problems can or will be managed or confidence to support
investment on one hand and political forbearance on the other."

Hoecker called for state officials to "expeditiously" implement the
provisions of FERC's Dec. 15 order.

In particular, he said, the California Power Exchange is making the financial
situation worse by ignoring the order's provision calling for suspension of
the single-price auction when prices bid exceed $150 per megawatt-hour.

"Prices above the level allowed in the Dec. 15 order (have) further
jeopardized the financial status of California utilities," he said.

Reaching a deal on forward contracts, as called for in FERC's order, is
essential, Hoecker said. "An arbitrary bottom-line solution cannot be
prescribed without regard to costs," he said.

But Hoecker reserved perhaps his harshest criticism for the state's first
legislative response to the crisis, which Davis signed into law Thursday, to
replace the California Independent System Operator's industry-participant
governing board with a board of political state appointees.

Such mixing of markets and politics on the ISO, a FERC-jurisdictional entity,
represents "an unacceptable intrusion...into federally regulated power
markets," Hoecker said.

Further, he said, FERC made "mistakes" in allowing AB 1890, the state's
electricity restructuring law, to usurp the commission's regulatory authority
over wholesale power markets in the first place.

"Because the state is now clearly a market participant, the independence of
the (ISO) board is bound to be compromised. Consequently, the state's
decisions are no longer entitled to the kind of deference we have accorded it
since AB 1890," Hoecker said.

"More than that, this action evinces a bald disregard for federal
jurisdiction and a rejection of cooperative solutions (called for in FERC's
Dec. 15 restructuring order)," Hoecker said. "I recommend that the commission
seek to enjoin this technically flawed and unlawful usurpation of its
authority."

Hoecker rejected the state's continuing call for firm price caps in the
region. "Price caps will only jeopardize reliability, mask problems
temporarily, and deter or destroy any chance to solve the long-term supply
challenge," he said.

Hoecker urged an urgent response by policymakers, regardless of whether the
utilities enter bankruptcy.

"We cannot...keep moving from one failure to the next, with no agreed-upon
objectives. The governor's stated plans are unrealistic and ours' cannot be
fully implemented without his help," Hoecker concluded. "I urge state
policymakers to reject the false illusion that going it alone will serve the
interests of California consumers."

-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; bryan.lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


When the folks in Berkeley have a chance, I'd appreciate the "final" file
that was released to the press, plus the final list of endorsements.   I
have the versions you sent out yesterday, but I assume that any typos, etc
were corrected and that the list of endorsements changed from yesterday.

Thanks for all the efforts back there.

John Chandley


We just wanted to let you guys know of some changes in order to keep the terminations being processed in a timely manner.  It appears that all Netco employees may be taken off of systems access for Enron this weekend.  In case this is true, Darron and I have transitioned from handling these requests.  Greg Couch is going to be leading the estate risk effort and Pat Ryder and Chance Rabon will be handling all termination list issues.  Please send these lists to these three people in lieu of Darron and I.  As a side note, could you send an updated financial termination list(if this list has changed since you sent it to me Kim) to these guys so that they can verify deals are moved to the proper book.  It is probably a good idea for future termination scripts to come through Greg before going to IT because of several book moves we have made to facilitate reporting to Ed McMichael.  For example the price book has been basically split into three books.  Please shout with any questions or concerns you may have.  Thanks.
PL


FYI

Jack Clark

Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <WewerLacy@aol.com>
Received: from mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta1-pr.rcsntx.swbell.net) by
sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server
sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G56006C6NMOJU@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for clark97@sims-ms-daemon; Wed,  6
Dec 2000 23:37:37 -0600 (CST)
Received: from imo-r12.mail.aol.com ([152.163.225.66]) by
mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server
sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G56004MRNJKU0@mta1.rcsntx.swbell.net> for clark97@sims1.rcsntx.swbell.net;
Wed, 06 Dec 2000 23:35:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from WewerLacy@aol.com by imo-r12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.34.) id
2.5a.e02fe16 (7402); Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:36:52 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:36:52 -0500 (EST)
From: WewerLacy@aol.com
Subject: IRS Proposed Regulation of Speech on Nonprofit's Internet Sites
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Message-id: <5a.e02fe16.27607bf4@aol.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL for Macintosh sub 146
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Clients and friends:

    Nonprofit organizations that maintain websites will want to know that the
IRS is considering regulating nonprofit Web speech.  Public comments are
being sought by the IRS on these proposed new rules for nonprofits.

    The Internal Revenue Service has released "Announcement 2000-84"
soliciting public comment on possible new regulations for charities, think
tanks and educational organizations.

    Among the questions the IRS is addressing in its review of exempt

organization's speech on their Internet sites is:

"Does providing a hyperlink on a charitable organization's website to

another organization that engages in political campaign intervention result

in per se prohibited political intervention?"

"To what extent are statements made by subscribers to a forum, such as a

listserv or newsgroup, attributable to an exempt organization that

maintains the forum?"

"Does a website constitute a single publication or communication? If not,

how should it be separated into distinct publications or communications?"

House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, has issued a statement

condemning the IRS' consideration of new regulations for the Internet.

"The IRS has no business getting involved in whether a think thank has

links on its website, or how often a charity's site is updated," he said.

"The idea of turning the tax man into a Net cop would have a chilling

effect on free speech on the Internet. I'm glad the agency has not taken

any regulatory action yet. But let's be clear about this. We will be

watching what they do, and we will not tolerate any backdoor attempt to

regulate the Internet."

The public comment period on this issue will close Feb. 13, 2001, according

to the IRS announcement. Comments are to be directed to Judith E. Kindell,

the principal author of the announcement, at the IRS, 1111 Constitution

Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20224.

We hope you find this information of interest.  As always, if we can answer
any questions, please contact us.

Sincerely,

James V. Lacy
Wewer & Lacy, LLP

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this communication and
any
accompanying document(s) is protected by the attorney-client and/or the
attorney/work product privileges.  It is intended for the sole use of the
addressee.  If the person actually receiving this communication or any other
reader of the communication is not the named recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Any such inadvertent
disclosure shall not compromise or be a waiver of any applicable privilege as
to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at (949) 248-1154, or
contact the sender at our email address above.  Thank you.


Daren,

 I apoligize for the late notice.  I didn't realize that we would need your
help until this morning.  Please let me know the time that is convenient for
you (tomorrow ?) and I will schedule another meeting.  We need to discuss the
purchase deals on MidTex Pipeline, at meters 0393 and 0391 (HPL's meter#s).
The first deal is with Etoco, original deal 44829 (12/98-12/99), which has
been moved to 133435 for Jan 2000 and going forward.  The second meter has
desk-to desk deals starting Jan 99 to present.  These deals need to be
scheduled on MidTex meters instead of HPL's meters.

Thu
3-7159


Considering Teb's comments relative to support activity for more than the Red Rock project then the OH order
	may be the best option for now.  All should keep in mind that some new accounting rules may require these costs
	to be expensed and only allow for costs directly related to a project be capitalized.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Debra
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:26 AM
To:	Saunders, James; Cobb Jr., John
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb
Subject:	RE: TW Overhead WO

Jim - We've decided to settle for the less than ideal solution and charge the TW OH workorder instead of specific projects.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:11 AM
To:	Lokey, Teb; Geaccone, Tracy; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Thompson, Debra; Kilmer III, Robert; Paschal, Zelda; Cobb Jr., John
Subject:	RE: TW Overhead WO
Importance:	High

no...
how's that for specific guidance!!

John C and team will provide guidance...maybe even a separate "support activity" workorder

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lokey, Teb
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:46 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Saunders, James; Thompson, Debra; Kilmer III, Robert; Paschal, Zelda
Subject:	RE: TW Overhead WO

We can charge directly but still need some guidance.  For example, it is my understanding that there are 4 WO set up for Red Rock - one for each station to be modified.  Our work is of a general nature, so do we have to further subdivide our charges to each of the stations, or to three of the stations.  Also, some of our time is spent on a general analysis of regulatory strategy involving all capital projects, and it seems like the overhead WO would be appropriate for these charges.  We don't necessarily want to have to have each person charge to 3 or 4 WO for each identifiable capital project and then to 10 or more WO for our general work.  Any specific suggestions, WO numbers, etc. ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:33 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lokey, Teb
Cc:	Saunders, James
Subject:	FW: TW Overhead WO

In response to where to charge your time to for TW projects, Jim Saunders prefers that you charge directly if possible.  Let me know if we need to discuss.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John
Subject:	RE: TW Overhead WO

this will allocate their charges to all tw projects...of course red rock dominates tw capital expenditures
a direct charge to a red rock w/o would be ideal

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:53 PM
To:	Saunders, James; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John
Subject:	TW Overhead WO

The TW commercial and regulatory team are charging to the TW overhead WO for their time related to TW projects including Red Rock.  Is this how you think we should be handling?


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/21/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/21/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/21/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 251,274
2/21/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 174,714
2/21/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 378,904


Bob --

Before we do anything on this issue, I would suggest that we need to have developed a strategy on a number of issues (primarily the proper reformation of the PX Credit calculation after Jan 18 and the application of the 1c/kwh surcharge).

On this issue, assuming that we haven't discuss the failure of SCE to apply our account's past credit with the CPUC (given that the bills were just received), I can't imagine that a federal court would look to favorably upon a legal action.

In addition, we have not identified where the "credits" are if they are not on the customer's accounts.

My recommendation is to first (a) work with SCE - have Jeff Dasovich run the traps and (b) discuss the issue with CPUC Division of Energy and see if there is a solution without Complaint.

If this doesn't get us anywhere before August 19, then it seems that to protect our interest we would need to file a complaint with the CPUC.  I am not opposed to LeBouef looking into federal action, but that seems a bit dramatic without first trying to exhaust our adminstrative remedies.

Please call me.

Jim

P.S. There is a meeting on the 1c/kwh surcharge with Janet Dietrich today at 1:30 in her office.  I think you should attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:05 PM
To:	'caferguson@llgm.com'; 'jbennett@gmssr.com'; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Mellencamp, Lisa; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Mara, Susan
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki; 'jklauber@llgm.com'; Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Dietrich, Janet; Black, Don
Subject:	PX Credit Claim

Now that we have the SCE bills showing that they are not going to credit past PX Credits against the T&D charges, here is the preliminary plan for challenging SCE's (and PG&E's anticipated) action.  As Diann explained, the bills begin becoming past due August 19, with late fees of 1.5% accruing thereafter.  Disconnect notices could be received 30 days thereafter, or about September 19.  Our target date for filing is Monday, August 20.

     1.  Charley Ferguson (LeBoef Lamb) will prepare an analysis of the pro's and con's of challenging the action in federal court versus at the CPUC (considering, e.g., bias of CPUC, timing, disconnect protection, etc.).  Charley will draft alternative Complaints.   He will get the input of the bankruptcy lawyers on the draft PG&E complaint.  I will circulate these drafts as soon as they are available.

     2.  Charley will first meet with Jeanne Bennett for a "download."  After that meeting he will likely also wish to speak with Wanda and Diann for additional background information.  (Thank you for your generosity with your time.)

     3.  I will check with Sue Mara to see what, if anything, the other ESPs may be planning to do to challenge SCE's action.  Not many still have direct access customers, but some do.

     4.  I will talk to Jim Steffes about an unofficial approach to SCE.

Please let me know if I have missed anything, and I would appreciate it if you would forward this along to anyone else who you think may like to have this information.  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 07:46 PM -----

	James D Steffes
	03/01/2001 01:18 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES,
Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, mday@gmssr.com, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Tara
Piazze/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@Enron, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PCG, EIX: Governor Davis Updates Wall Street

FYI.  Info on Gov Davis meeting with Wall Street.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:17 PM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/01/2001 11:30 AM

		 To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT,
jklauber@llgm.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PCG, EIX: Governor Davis Updates Wall Street

This is one of the better overviews of all the issues from CSFB.

.

 - ppp030101.pdf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Services Meeting w/ Presto and Tom May - EB30C1

Date:		6/25/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


David:

We are drafting a credit derivative confirmation in connection with one of
our year-end deals.  Will you or Jean be able to review the confirm with us?
I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards.  Sara


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 04:14 PM -----

	Brian Hendon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/11/2000 03:47 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristy Carnes/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, lucky@webnology.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Horoscopes
?

By Lloyd Schumner Sr.
Retired Machinist and A.A.P.B.-Certified Astrologer

?
?

Aries: (March 21--April 19)
After enduring the false smiles and empty promises of the business world for
22 years, you'll appreciate the candor of the DEA agents assigned to you.

Taurus: (April. 20--May 20)
It seems like another sleepy day around your house. Unless, of course, you
live at 332 Pheasant Drive in Yuma, AZ.

Gemini: (May 21--June 21)
You've lost your enthusiasm, but you're unsure if it was "damped" or
"dampened."

Cancer: (June 22--July 22)
Cancer would like to take this opportunity to point out that it was right
about the unrest in Yugoslavia.

Leo: (July 23--Aug. 22)
Though you've been telling everyone that you "went down on a boatload of
sailors," the aircraft carrier Nimitz is actually a "ship."

Virgo: (Aug. 23--Sept. 22)
You will make religious and scientific history when you develop a machine
that converts standard English measurements to Islam.
?
Libra: (Sept. 23--Oct. 23)
While it's true that life is not a movie, many of your problems will be
solved when the Army destroys the giant lizard 10 minutes before the end.

Scorpio: (Oct. 24--Nov. 21)
Things have certainly changed for you during these last few years. For one
thing, eating a complete breakfast is now more important than ever.

Sagittarius: (Nov. 22--Dec. 21)
You will be hailed as a Catholic genius when you invent a new rhythm that's
45 percent effective in preventing non-predestined pregnancies.

Capricorn: (Dec. 22--Jan. 19)
You will be one step closer to perfection when famed Italian engineer Massimo
Bordi redesigns you for better airflow and optimal fuel atomization.

Aquarius: (Jan. 20--Feb. 18)
Wednesday will provide those who know you a perfect opportunity to marvel
about how right Dante was about the fate of moneylenders.

Pisces: (Feb. 19--March 20)
The stars indicate success for you, but they do so with enough ambiguity to
cover any possible alternatives.

Click Here To Close


Just FYI, whether it matters or not, but commissions in gas average $3-4 a
contract.  Not sure about power.

Andy Zipper@ENRON
08/28/2000 04:10 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: commissions saved

While we are putting this card together I thougth you guys might like to see
some of the imputed commission numbers.......I thought we would cut it off at
$100,000 saved. I'm using an average rate of $10 per 10,000 mmbtu gas and
power equivalent.


Vince

Many thanks for you help with this - look forward to receiving the info on
SDDP.

Kind regards,
John


PC: emclaug - errol5enter Sun:  emclaug - secure4u


I took the opportunity to listen to your presentation to the financial
analyst community today, and wanted to say your 'delivery of the goods' was
outstanding. Having enthusiastic and focused Leaders helps maintain our own
enthusiasm and energy levels!

Mike Nelson
ETS North Operations
402 398 7600


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 09/05/2000
04:45 PM ---------------------------

Larry F Campbell
09/05/2000 04:30 PM
To: Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

http://www.vegasinsider.com/u/football/college/2000returnees.htm


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>  <<CALPINE MONTHLY GAS
NOMINATION___.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc
 - CALPINE MONTHLY GAS NOMINATION___.doc


We discussed the process of doing away with the confirmations for EnronOnline transactions in our last group meeting.  It looks like the most equitable way to staff these is to rotate them among the lawyers like we rotate masters among the paralegals.  No one should end up with more than two or three of them that way.  Janet Moore is taking a first cut using the form and adding the power-specific provisions and then sending them on to the gas group.  The gas group will then forward them to me for us to include any derivatives-specific provisions.


Don't execute it yet, it should have been released to MME for Jun. I'll talk
to
MME/LILCO.

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 06/09/2000 03:22:36 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Scott.Goodell@enron.com
Subject: Lilco Capacity

Lilco released the Transco Capacity to CES for June.  We still have not
executed
the capacity.  The volume is 84 dth (offer #19858) and you don't get billed a
demand charge from the pipeline.  I believe Lilco bills CES directly for
participating in the program.

Do you want to execute this capacity?

thanks


Hey, strange,,, While I was biking home from the Thanksgiving Day Parade
downtown, I came across a gasoline-powered weed eater (or something like
that) dead in the middle of the street, in front of some townhomes, on
Dennis down around Bagby or Helena.  I picked it up and moved into the
courtyard of the townhomes, which for some reason had left their driveway
gate open.  I hope I got it back to the right homeowner, but in case
someone's missing one, you might check with that set of townhomes.

Incidentaly, about a year ago, I came up missing  a small electric
Black&Decker hedge trimmer.  I have no idea how it was taken, because I
NEVER turn my back on tools while I'm out working.  But anyway, it's gone.
If anyone has come across it, I sure would like to have it back.

Julie Young
(713) 528-5614

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Novotny" <bobnovotny@juno.com>
To: <emca@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: *EMCA* Weed eater

> I woke tues. morning and did my usual walk around my property. (Texas
> Junk Co. and the boarded up property across the street at 214 Welch)
> well i found a weed eater hidden in the cactus garden waiting for a
> pick-up at a moe opportune time.
> If someone out there lost one give me a call and discribe it and it's
> yours.
> 713-524-6257
> Bob
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Promise to Quit
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5vN8tD/AqSDAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Hi Sara

Have had a dig around re the agency agreement and it appears that Mahesh
Lakhani is responsible for this.  There is a copy with Paul Simons o it is
definitely being worked on.  Mahesh is out of the office until Monday.

Hope this helps.

Regards


Hello Jeff

A voice from the past.  Hope you are doing well.

I wanted to gain your assistance to point me to the most appropriate person
I could interview at Enron.  I am helping a client understand how companies
in the US Natural Gas and Power industry are coping with the challenges in
their industry in terms of developing and retaining the "right skills".
So, someone who could provide an external perspective of how players in the
industry are coping with the challenges as well as an internal perspective
on Enron would be great for me to interview.  If that means more than one
individual, that is fine too.

Hope this is not too much of an imposition.  I'll undertake the
conversation over the telephone and keep it short.

You can reach me on email: sgiridha@prismintl.com or on my cell phone:
240-603-6084.

Thanks a lot for your assistance.

Shyam Giridharadas


Start Date: 2/27/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022704.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 100.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 100.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/27/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DUCKS
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


We regret to announce that Amy Fitzpatrick will be leaving Enron's Portland office in September.  Amy's husband, Simon, has accepted a job in New Jersey, and it didn't make sense for them to "commute" coast to coast.  Amy will continue to work here for the next month or two to hire her replacement and to make sure that her responsibilities have been completely handed over.  We really appreciate having such long lead time to effectuate this transition.

Amy has made tremendous contributions to our office over the last 14 months.  We really appreciate her efforts.  We realize that Amy has become integral to the efficient operation of the Portland office and want to make her transition as smooth as possible.  If you have any concerns or wish to get any issues on to the "transition list" please let your manager and/or Amy know.

Tim Belden and Chris Calger


Hey! Just checking out the new machine.  I sent Cole's birthday present
today.  Hope he gets it on time.  Let me know if you get this message please.


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000
07:22 PM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
05/08/2000 06:33 PM
To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SG Interests V

Rod:
I found my file and here is where things stand:

1. On cross default threshold, they wanted it to be the same as the
collateral threshold but my notes indicate that they were okay leaving it at
$100,000.

2. In lieu of receiving financials from them, we had agreed to accept
quarterly and annual Lease Operating Statements.  Did I use the correct
term?  Do we need a definition for this or is it understood what these
statements are?  I am also assuming that they are internally prepared.  Is
that correct?  My notes indicate that these would be provided within 90 days
after quarter end.

3. We agreed to a collateral threshold for them of $500,000.

4.  For the MAC trigger, is the only test the Net Cash Flow/Revenue test and
if so, what would trigger the MAC?  Are there other triggers?  We used to
have Funded Debt/Partners Capital, EBITDA Coverage Ratio and Minimum Partners
Capital tests.  Alos, here are my proposed definitions:

Cash Flow means Net Income plus depreciation and non-cash charges minus
capital expenditures as shown on the income statement.

Net Income means gross revenues and other proper income credits, less all
proper income charges, including taxes on income.

Revenue is cash received from the sale of oil, gas and plant products.

Should there be references to the Lease Operating Statements in these
definitions?

5. All Performance Assurance would be rounded up to multiples of $10,000.

This is all that I have.  Let me know what you think.

Carol


Start Date: 1/22/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012219.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Tana,

This has made the circle to me.  Did they say what kind of trade there is
between Diashowa and NBC.  My expectation is a currency hedge.

bobc

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 4:21 PM
To: Crane Jr., Bob
Subject: FW: Daishowa

I am guessing we would take assignment of the deal if we purchased the
company who had this contract.  Do you know about it?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Bradford, William S.; Brackett, Debbie; Rohauer, Tanya; Reves, Brant;
Ngo, Tracy; Campbell, Lesli; Espinoza, Veronica; Radous, Paul; Lebrocq,
Wendi; Diamond, Russell; Moran, Tom; Sacks, Edward; Mendoza, Nidia; Conwell,
Wendy; Vanek, Darren; Johnson, Rudwell
Subject: Daishowa

I got a call from National Bank of Canada and they said that we purchased the
referenced company and what did we intend to do with the trade between NBC
and Daishowa?  Anyone know anything about this?


The current Bengalla purchase transaction for approximately $3.5mm is approved by credit and from a cash flow standpoint.  Please continue to approve transactions through credit.  However, for the most part we will treat the coal business, as business as usual.

Thanks,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Mcclellan, George
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Bradford, William S.
Cc: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject: RE: Coal Deals

Bill - apologize for missing our meeting yesterday.  Please give me a call first thing to go over Bengalla and Drummond.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford, William S.
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Mcclellan, George
Cc: Suttle, John
Subject: RE: Coal Deals

George,

I would be happy to discuss with you.  It remains critical that we manage all cash requirements as our access to capital markets has been impacted over the past few weeks.  Hopefully the announcement on Friday will improve our ability to execute transactions like this in future, but prior to Friday this was a necessary precaution.  Unfortunately, you are working at a different company than you were a few weeks ago.

We can discuss next week.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Mcclellan, George
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 7:51 PM
To: Suttle, John; Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam;
Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S.
Subject: RE: Coal Deals

John / Bill - talk with me in Houston on Monday - we ain't operating like this.
George

-----Original Message-----
From:	Suttle, John
Sent:	Fri 11/9/2001 12:36 PM
To:	Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S.
Cc:	Mcclellan, George
Subject:	RE: Coal Deals

The Bengalla deal was struck after I had given ECAP notice of the liquidity problems, and more importantly, without any RAC involvement.

From a RAC perspective this deal is still unapproved.  If an invoice discount facility can be used, or some other means of performing without using Enron capital then you should move forward.  If these options are not available, then the issue should either be raised to Louise Kitchen for approval or unwound until the liquidity problems are resolved.

John

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Peters, Jez
	Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:17 PM
	To:	Staley, Stuart; Suttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S.
	Cc:	Mcclellan, George
	Subject:	RE: Coal Deals

	needless to say we need some clarification here - Bengalla deal is alreday in forward motion in that coal being delivered to port as of today and we have commitments which we need to source for. Please call.

	thks
	Jez

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Staley, Stuart
		Sent:	Friday, 9 November 2001 5:54 AM
		To:	Suttle, John; Miyai, Tark; Peters, Jez; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S.
		Cc:	Mcclellan, George
		Subject:	RE: Coal Deals

		John:

		I assume this does not apply to ECTRL business, as we have not been given a reciprocal recommendation for European biz.  Can you confirm this?  Also, can you clarify what the specific issue is with ECAP that is not an issue with ECTRL?  Is this specific to cash flow within Australian entities?

		Thanks,

		Stu

			 -----Original Message-----
			From: 	Suttle, John
			Sent:	08 November 2001 17:42
			To:	Miyai, Tark; Peters, Jez; Staley, Stuart; Bauer, Adam; Nimmo, Matthew; Bradford, William S.
			Subject:	Coal Deals

			In light of the current situation in Houston, I recommend we wait to finalize any physical coal sourcing or deliveries in the ECAP business.  In short, RAC cannot approve any purchase or sale until the liquidity issues are resolved.  Hopefully by the end of the week we will know more, have things settled, and business can continue as normal.

			Please call me if you have any questions.

			John
			281-345-8264


Engage Energy Canada is an Alberta corporation.

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/23/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana Fayett/ENRON@enronXgate, Jana
Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen
O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/ENRON@enronXgate, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly
LaFuze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Thu Pham
Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-23-01

Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
713-853-3017


Account Information

	Help

Do not reply to this message. If you did not request this account,  click
here.

Registration Confirmed - Welcome to Yahoo!
This message confirms your new account with Yahoo!.

?

Your Yahoo! ID:
mpfarmer
Your email address:
dfarmer@enron.com

?
What if the email address listed above is incorrect or changes in the future?
Please keep your email contact current so we can help you in case you can't
access your Yahoo! account.  To update your email address, first sign into
My Yahoo! or any other Yahoo! personalized service.  Then click on "Account
Info" at the top of the page.  (If "Account Info" is not available, please
click on "Options" first, then on "Account Info.")  The field you need to
change is called "Alternate email address."

?
							What can I do with my new Yahoo! ID?
Yahoo! Mail	Yahoo! Mail
	Get your own yahoo.com email address		Yahoo! Auctions	Yahoo! Auctions
				Buy and sell for free.		[IMAGE]	Yahoo! Chat
							Chat with people from all over the world.

Yahoo! Calendar	Yahoo! Calendar
	Keep yourself organized.		My Yahoo!	My Yahoo!
				Customize the way you use the internet.		Yahoo! Games	Yahoo! Games
							New and classic online games.

Yahoo! Travel	Yahoo! Travel
	Reservations, tickets, discounts and information.		Yahoo! Shopping	Yahoo! Shopping
				Search for your favorite products and brands and compare prices.		Yahoo! Messenger	Yahoo!
Messenger
							Get notified when you have new mail and send instant messages.

Show me more...
Thank you for signing up at Yahoo!
?

What if I didn't request this account?

Please click here if you didn't request it or no longer wish to have it.   If
you are then prompted for the deletion key, please cut and paste the
following to the text box as requested on the deletion page:
IXtKendhZnV6YnU4jiF5Sk50NGJlTjZ5Znl3MU4hdUpOMjNOMjY1NE8hc0p6jg==

You could also reply to this email (and make sure to copy this entire email
in your  reply) with REMOVE as the subject line.

[192.152.140.9]


Dave Delainey has requested feedback on all the interested parties by this
Friday.  If you have recently made contact with your respective company(s),
please drop me a line and let me know the latest.  If no contact has been
made recently, please call and see how things are going.  All of these
companies should have had books for a week plus.  As you all are aware, bids
are due a week from Friday.  I am unsure who ultimately made the contact with
some of these companies, so I have bunched them together.  If there are some
companies that I haven't included, but that you have feedback on, please let
me know what it is.  Thanks for all your help, and it looks like the real fun
is just around the corner.

Calger/Kelemen/Thomas/Parquet
Avista
Ida-West
BP Amoco
PG&E
AES
Calpine(?)

Mike Miller
AEP
PSEG
Tenaska

Bruce Sukaly
MEGA

Ben Rogers
Kinder

Regards,

Don


sounds good.


kinda cute...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 12:13
PM ---------------------------

Scott Laidlaw@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/01/2001 08:27 AM
To: carl.stendebach@abbpge.com, denis.peranic@chkra.mail.abb.com,
coaustin@wt.net, ausco@cnrf.nola.navy.mil, austin@cnsrf.navy.mil,
blarson@genphysics.com, bbarlow7@aol.com, john.d.sample@lmco.com,
sample@idcomm.com, chris.basham@bus.utexas.edu, dan_m_corpman@raytheon.com,
dsmith81@juno.com, blues21@juno.com, john_e_jackson@dell.com,
jjackson1@austin.rr.com, john_stratemeier@bmc.com, strat@ghg.net,
shaloney@aol.com, mike_d_carathers@raytheon.com, mikec1234@aol.com,
rnelson@jellybelly.com, cdrtom@aol.com, rew@aklw.com, lonpjs@dames.com,
guy_newnham@urscorp.com, psc1957@aol.com, quik_mike@hotmail.com,
C01Michael.Laidlaw@usafa.af.mil, sem5615@aol.com, crhoff@aol.com,
rahns@prodigy.net, dgreene@busey.com, marysia@mail.utexas.edu,
FrankO@geapcs.com, psc1957@aol.com, bob.joyce@kvaerner.com, tcmcgill@aol.com,
gbrown@ne.com, bwalden@ipa.net, dowgriff@gapac.com, JWilson55@aol.com,
blubird66@aol.com, shaloney@aol.com, hudgins@lava.net,
JaworowskiRO@nnsy.navy.mil, ronbud@mciworld.com,
kaufman-global@houston.rr.com, jimf@spawar.navy.mil, jasmith@spawar.navy.mil,
mvwohlsc@ix.netcom.com, melissa@toshibatic.com, Jane
Furman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pat
Esslinger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harvey
Mitchell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric
Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carla
Galvan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gayla E
Seiter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy
Hodges/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Darby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Havlik/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, curranac@hotmail.com, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, hscheller@canfibreny.com,
rhowell@bechtel.com, Kathleen A Cook/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Marilyn Oliver/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, J Douglas
McNeilly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, mccurran44@hotmail.com,
hschell@banet.net, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, kathryn.laidlaw@duke.edu,
kal7@duke.edu, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, GAluce@aol.com
cc:

Subject: joke; from "da hudgins"

The teacher gave her fifth grade class an assignment:
Get their parents to
 tell them a story with a moral at the end of it. The
next cay the kids
 came back and one by one began to tell their stories.

Janey said, "My father's a farmer and we have a lot of
egg-laying hens.
One time we were taking our eggs to market in a basket
on the front seat of
the pickup when we hit a bump in the road and all the
eggs went flying and
broke and made a mess.

"And what's the moral of the story?" asked the teacher.
"Don't put all
your eggs in one basket!"

"Very good," said the teacher.

Next little Lucy raised a hand and said, "Our family
are farmers too. But
we raise chickens for the meat market. We had a dozen
eggs one time, but
when
they hatched we only got ten live chicks and the moral
to this story is,
don't count your chickens until they're hatched."

"That was a fine story Lucy

Johnny, do you have a story to share?"

"Yes, ma'am, my daddy told me this story about my Aunt
Karen. Aunt Karen
was a flight engineer in Desert Storm and her plane got
hit.  She had to
bail
out over enemy territory and all she had was a bottle
of whiskey, a
machine gun and a machete. She drank the whiskey on the
way down so it
wouldn't
break and then she landed right in the middle of 100
enemy troops. She
killed seventy of them with the machine gun until she
ran out of  bullets,
then she killed twenty more with the machete till the
blade broke and then
she killed the last ten with her bare hands.

"Good heavens," said the horrified teacher, "what kind
of moral did your
  Daddy tell you from that horrible story?"

"Stay the Hell away from Aunt Karen when she's been
drinking."


Paul,

Attached is a schedule showing what our worksheet amounts came to for the CIG and the PSCo invoicing.  To the right of that you'll see the date we (Nicole or Theresa and Mark or myself depending on which month) agreed on the amount and sent the wire transfer request to our A/P and the date the wire paid.

Some months I sent the Colorado payments to A/P the same day as the Arizona payments and A/P put them together since they were to the same vendor.  Hope this helps.

I still maintain that this complete payment review is a separate issue from the LGS/Woodward volumes which you can clearly see that we didn't deduct (the CIG volumes are exactly what we paid) while for the same months you were billing LGS/Woodward for those volumes as well.  Please do everything you can to expedite resolution of this matter and we look forward to working with you on your payment review.

Sincerely,

-Craig W. Lipke
Citizens Energy Supply
Phone (928) 226-2243
Fax     (928) 226-2168
Cell     (928) 699-3683

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from Citizens
Communication Co. are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.  Any other use is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender immediately.
*******************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: Lucci, Paul T. [mailto:Paul.T.Lucci@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Lipke, Craig
Subject: RE: PSCo Imbalance Payback and Holiday Notices

Craig,

Can you please get with John Cogan on our need for all wire transfer backup.  We will need the detail of all wire transfers sent to ENA for payment on the CIG and PSCo assets.  You can reach me at 303 575-6474.

Thanks
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Lipke, Craig [mailto:CWLipke@czn.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Theresa Staab (E-mail); Paul Lucci (E-mail)
Cc: Sean Breen (E-mail); John Cogan (E-mail)
Subject: PSCo Imbalance Payback and Holiday Notices

FYI...   -Craig

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


As a result of a smooth launch and market demand, we are accelerating the
timetable for the launch of several EnronOnline products.

Specifically,  after the launch of U.S. power on Monday, Dec. 13th, we will
be launching the following:

Wednesday, December 15: US Coal, U.S. Plastics, US Pulp and Paper
Thursday, December 16: Norwegian Power

Although the legal review has been completed for all of the above, I would
appreciate it if you would look once more at the products which are relevant
to your area and confirm that you are happy with them (some of you are
already in the process of doing so - thank you)

We absolutely want to avoid making changes after launch due to the problems
associated with changing descriptions on products which have already traded.

The Product Long Descriptions can be seen in the Product Manager by expanding
the Product Type in the tree to show each of the dependent Products, then
right-clicking the Product, selecting View and then pressing the View
Description button which appears on the pop-up window.

Please contact myself or Dale Neuner if you have any comments.

Thanks,

Dave


we can do two groups of  3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22siva66+22+20+3Csiva66+40mail+2Eev1+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 12:02 PM
To:	MarkM@cajunusa.com; Quigley, Dutch; martier@cpchem.com; ras1119@hotmail.com; klyn@pdq.net
Subject:	RE:

don't you guys think we need at least a 7th for golf so they will
not make us pair up with someone else? my friend christian
cancelled when he found out kevin was going to be there.  thanks
alot kevin!!!

ricardo

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:37:23 -0500

>Jerry is a no for Sat.
>
>>>> "siva66" <siva66@mail.ev1.net> 09/14/01 10:30AM >>>
>i hope so because we only have 6 so far: kevin, mark, dutch,
>richard, ernie, and myself.
>
>
>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>From: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
>Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:28:40 -0500
>
>>I'm glad someone else is starting to see what I've had to put up
>with all of these years.  You should have heard his response as
to
>why he couldn't pay the rent or the phone bill or go grocery
>shopping for the month.  Oh wait a minute that was Rob, not
>Jerry.  I always get the two mixed up.  Once again I will
>ask.....Jerry are you going to go golfing manana?
>>
>>>>> <Dutch.Quigley@enron.com> 09/14/01 08:10AM >>>
>>jerry is practicing his law talk
>>did not answer the question but gave a 500 word response
>>
>>    -----Original Message-----
>>   From:   "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>@ENRON
>>             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-
>+22Mark+20Molnar+22+20+3CMarkM+40cajunusa+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
o
>m]
>>
>>
>>   Sent:   Friday, September 14, 2001 8:00 AM
>>   To:     martier@cpchem.com; Quigley, Dutch;
>>             IMCEANOTES-Wolphguy+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com;
>>             ras1119@hotmail.com; siva66@mail.ev1.net;
>jramirez@othon.com;
>>             klyn@pdq.net
>>   Cc:     john_riches@msn.com
>>   Subject:  RE:
>>
>>   Three
>>
>>   >>> "Martinez, Ernesto Jr" <martier@cpchem.com> 09/13/01
>06:30PM >>>
>>   WHat is the over/under on the number of times Jerry throws
his
>club(s)?
>>
>>   -----Original Message-----
>>   From: Quigley, Dutch [mailto:Dutch.Quigley@ENRON.com]
>>   Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:45 PM
>>   To: Wolphguy@aol.com@ENRON; Martinez, Ernesto Jr;
>ras1119@hotmail.com;
>>   siva66@mail.ev1.net; klyn@pdq.net; jramirez@othon.com;
>>   markm@cajunusa.com
>>   Cc: john_riches@msn.com
>>   Subject: RE:
>>
>>
>>   ok that is fine , I will give mark jerry's' balls , I just
>want a chance
>>   to kick your ass at golf buddy
>>
>>   I am still waiting for Nov. 2 .................then I can
kick
>the ass
>>   of a golfing lawyer
>>
>>   dq
>>
>>   >  -----Original Message-----
>>   > From:      Wolphguy@aol.com@ENRON
>>   > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Wolphguy+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>>   > Sent:      Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:28 PM
>>   > To:   martier@cpchem.com; ras1119@hotmail.com;
>siva66@mail.ev1.net;
>>   > klyn@pdq.net; jramirez@othon.com; markm@cajunusa.com;
>Quigley, Dutch
>>   > Cc:   john_riches@msn.com
>>   > Subject:   RE:
>>   >
>>   > Alright, I'll throw my two cents in.  Dutch is right, Ricky
>is right,
>>   > Ernie is right, as is Kevin and everyone else who
>responded.  We are
>>   > an extremely fortunate bunch.  We tend to be
extraordinarily
>resilient
>>   > and forgiving.  I took a bunch of flak over the past three
>years for
>>   > my frequent absences, however, they were not absences
>because of a
>>   > flippant attitude.  Law school took its toll as did
>accommodating Jo's
>>   > set of friends.  My time had to be split many ways and it
>can be
>>   > difficult to juggle everything as I am sure you are all
>aware.  But,
>>   > mind you, I was not absent because I didn't care, or found
>something
>>   > better to do.  It was never because I didn't want to.  At
>the risk of
>>   > this becoming even more of a love in, you guys should know,
>as this is
>>   > apparently the only opportunity we've taken, you are my
>friends.  And
>>   > I would like to keep it that way.  I have to go now.  Mark
>says that
>>   > that the keyboard placement blocks his access to my balls.
>>   >
>>   > Jerry
>>
>>
>>
>******************************************************************
*
>***
>>   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
relevant
>affiliate
>>   and
>>   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
>use of the
>>   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>disclosure by
>>   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>recipient (or
>>   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
>sender or
>>   reply
>>   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
and
>delete
>>   all
>>   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
>hereto) are not
>>   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
>or evidence
>>   a
>>   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
>of its
>>   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
and
>may not
>>   be
>>   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>otherwise.
>>   Thank you.
>>
>******************************************************************
*
>***
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

Phillip M Love
11/30/2000 01:54 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jimmy Simien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
01:53 PM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


FYR
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Stephanie J
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	FW: DRAFT MEDIA STATEMENT RE: KLL COMPENSATION
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:29 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Harris, Stephanie J ; Meyer, Vance; Philipp, Meredith; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen
Subject:	DRAFT MEDIA STATEMENT RE: KLL COMPENSATION
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Jim -- We have been getting a large number of media calls about the 14A filing, which discusses Ken Lay's change of control provision in his contract.  We would like to use the following with media -- and internal meetings with employees:

	Change of control provisions are very common at the CEO level.  Ken has had a change of control provision in his employment contract since 1989.  It enables him to trigger an involuntary termination in the event of a change of control, which includes a merger or consolidation with another corporation and Enron is not the surviving corporation.  This would have gone into effect in the event of a hostile takeover or the announced merger with Dynegy.

Please let me know ASAP if we are able to use this statement.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


Title: California in the Dark
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2302

In a recent Washington Post op-ed piece, Dan Yergin and Larry Makovich
discuss the continued mess of California's electric power problems. Rather
than fixing the flaws, the current policies from Sacramento are moving
California down the road to an expensive public power setup and higher prices
for consumers and businesses. And the shortage is going to get worse this
summer.

**end**

Follow above URL for full report.

E-mail Category: Alert
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy,