Clinique, it's there new one.  But is she registered under Danielle Crusoe?  They do have a registry, correct.  I'm kinda excited to know what Danielle is registered for?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Hi

Hey noonie!

I am going to try to make it to revival as well so I'll bring your
invitation. I have one for Robin too. Tasha told me that she told her about
it but she didn't say whether she was coming or not. Those are the two
places where she is registered. You are a mess talking about you might have
to pick something up for yourself. It is hard not to come out of there with
something for yourself and I'm sure Todd wouldn't be mad at cha' :o) I have
all the games ready for the shower, I sure hope everyone enjoys them.

What is your favorite mascara?

                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
                    11/02/01 09:14        Subject:     RE: Hi
                    AM

Hope,

I did not have Sheree's telephone number after all.  I am going to the
Revival tonight, so hopefully, she will be there and I will talk to her
then.  Did anyone invite Robin to the shower?  Also, where is Danielle
registered?  I need to do my shopping hopefully, before I go to church
tonight.  I think Tasha mentioned Vicky's Secret and Target.  Is she
registered at Vicky's Secret?  I might have to pick up something for
myself.  Let me know, b/c I have to stop by the mall anyway to get my
favorite mascara, and I just as soon go there at the same time.

Hugs

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:56 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  RE: Hi

   Yes we were out shopping today at Arne's. Tasha had me gone for 2.5
   hours
   because we stopped at Benihana's! I'm so proud of Jordan. What subject
   is
   he enjoying the most? Taylor loves reading. DeMya has been repeating
   just
   about every word that you say. Tricey why does she say no mam,
   especially
   to Taylor. I guess I say that too much :o).

   I do mean Sheree, that's a cute spelling of her name. Yes, please tell
   her
   or like you said call me. Danielle was going to get her address because
   she
   had her name down for someone she wanted to invite but didn't get a
   chance
   to.

   Smooches

                       Patrice.L.Mims
                       @enron.com            To:
   hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com
                                             cc:
                       11/01/01 03:16        Subject:     RE: Hi
                       PM

   Hey Lady,

   I just asked "Tarsha" about you the other day.  I hear you two have been
   shopping for decorations, etc. for the shower.  I will be there on
   Saturday, looking forward to it.  How are the girls, the boys are doing
   great.  Jordan just got his first report card, and it was very good.
   I'm
   very proud of him, and Kendall is just Kendall, my little "stinky".

   Who is Sherie or do you mean Sheree?  I may have her number at home,
   I'll
   call you if I do, or just call her for you.

   Talk with you later!!!

   Hugs

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   hope-frelix@reliantenergy.com@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:41 PM
      To:     Mims, Patrice L.
      Subject:  Hi

      Hey Tricey!

      I haven't talked to you or seen you in a little while. What has been
      going
      on? How are the boys?

      Not too much is going on with me. I went on a field trip with Taylor
      yesterday to the Oil Ranch (pumpkin patch) and we had a good time.

      Danielle was going to give you your invitation to her shower on
   Tuesday
      but
      she didn't know that we weren't having rehearsal and I didn't either.
      Needless to say, I have your invitation and I would like to give it
   to
      you.
      Do you think that you are coming? It's at the Pappadeaux on
   Westheimer
      at
      4PM. By the way, do you by chance have Sherie's phone number or email
      address I have one for her too?

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
   all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Appointment of Paul Lanham as Senior Vice President And Chief Technology
Officer of Jones Apparel Group, Inc.

********************************

********************************

View complete article at:
http://www.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=JNY&article=21603461

JONES APPAREL GROUP INC  33.250

BRISTOL, Pa., Dec 11, 2000 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Wesley R. Card, Chief
Financial Officer for Jones Apparel Group, Inc. (NYSE: JNY), today announced
the
appointment of Paul Lanham to the newly created position of Senior Vice
President and Chief Technology Officer of the Jones Apparel Group. I

Other Companies Involved:
AMES
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

, Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


Detailed Functional specs are available in o:\eol\phase2


Andrea,

After reviewing Bryan Hull's resume, I think he would be best suited for the
trading track program.  Please forward his resume to Karen Buckley.

Phillip


I will not be taking Friday, 10/6, off.

I will be taking Friday, 10/13 off.

Brenda, please arrange for coverage for my desk.  Thank you, in advance, for
your assistance.

Taffy


Attached please find the weekly summary of issues for the week beginning Oct. 15, 2001.  If you have any questions or comments please contact me at ext 54751.

Regards,

Nancy


We have 4 of each of these available at $19 (or whatever face value is).
Just let me know what you want to do.

Thanks,

Kay

Carolyn George
01/23/2001 02:08 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Rodeo Tickets

The performances I am interested in are:

Clay Walker
Destiny's Child
Leanne Womak

Thanks,

Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith, EB3836A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439    Fax:  (713) 646-3393
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


Interesting letter....

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:36 PM -----

	"Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
	03/01/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: "'sue.nord@enron.com'" <sue.nord@enron.com>, "'scott_bolton@enron.net'"
<scott_bolton@enron.net>, "'sburns@enron.com'" <sburns@enron.com>
		 cc: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>, "Aamoth, Robert J."
<RAamoth@KelleyDrye.com>
		 Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

Dear Sue, Scott and Steve -- The letter below from George Gilder to FCC
Chairman Powell sets important parameters for our "vision".  We anticipated
that Powell would be unimpressed, if not hostile, to "open access"
approaches, but this should put a nail in the coffin.  The watchword will be
"innovation".  I imagine that both "Telecosm" and Hamel's "Leading the
Revolution" are high on Powell's reading list!

We look forward to talking with you next week.  Aileen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Engel, Michael C.
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Telecommunications Practice Group
Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

This is an interesting letter to Commissioner Powell published last week.
Given the level of respect that the Commissioner has for Mr. Gilder (MKP has
repeatedly referenced Gilder's book Telecosm and speaks of him frequently),
it may be worth reading.  In any event, it gives a pretty good 30,000 foot
view of telecom policy considerations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Jackson [mailto:pjackson@fcc.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:09 PM
To: powell_interns@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

** Confidential **

The Wall Street Journal
Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Friday, February 23, 2001

The Broadband Economy Needs a Hero
By George Gilder and Bret Swanson

  Dear Mr. Powell:

  Whether you know it or not, your leadership and decisions over the next
four years will have more impact on the economy than those of Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

   Surely, our stock-market swoon of 2000 and stagnating economic growth in
2001 are partly due to the Fed's inexplicable liquidity leash combined with
the highest tax burden since World War II. But the chief threats to the
21st- century economy are the politicians, bureaucrats and Silicon Valley
know-nothings responsible for America's broadband connectivity crisis.

  We owe Les Vadasz of Intel an apology for making fun of his prediction
that narrowband links would prevail into the 21st century. The Internet as
we know it is about seven years old, yet fewer than 7 million of 100 million
American homes enjoy broadband and its wealth of social, commercial and
educational opportunities.

  Contrary to popular belief, the chief obstacle to progress is not
entrenched Bell operating companies, but a regulatory regime that presumes
to "level the playing field," "equalize access," and "promote competition."
The only result of these policies has been the effective nationalization and
paralysis of broadband.

  The 1996 Telecommunications Act ruled that in exchange for the right to
enter the long-distance telephone business, the Bells must open their
residential copper lines to competitors, as well as allow these competitors
to locate equipment in Bell central offices and offer digital subscriber
line (DSL) services over Bell-owned copper. In November 1999, the FCC issued
a further decree forcing the Bells to stop dragging their feet and
cooperate.

  The FCC actions spawned a new category of start-ups known as broadband
competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), which planned to compete with
the Bells. Funded by billions of dollars in Silicon Valley venture capital
and public offerings, companies like Rhythms, Northpoint, Covad and Jato
earned praise from "libertarians" in both Washington and Palo Alto, Calif.
Northpoint even had freedom-loving former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt on its
board.

  But despite all good intentions, these were not high-tech start-ups. They
became venture capital-funded lobbying and litigation shops intent on
forcing the Bells to share their copper. With more press releases on new
lawsuits than on new subscribers, one of the companies epitomized the
strategy: "Rhythms continues successful regulatory litigation." The result
of all this lawyering? The CLECs won everything. Access to copper wherever
they sued. Multimillion- dollar awards from the Bells. And bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy?

  Late last year, Northpoint filed for Chapter 11 after Verizon withdrew an
$800 million investment. Jato closed its doors. Rhythms cut its staff by
23%. Covad is slashing 800 jobs and closing 260 central offices. Of Covad's
274,000 lines in service, 92,000 are not "recognizing revenue." And all of
this is happening in the face of massive consumer demand for broadband
services.

  The problem is that DSL is risky and hard. Some studies have reported that
50% of DSL hook-ups fail on the first try. Even amicable relationships
between CLECs and Bells are a software nightmare, with a different billing
and provisioning system for each service provider. Such difficulties render
DSL not a matter of will and politics but of technical and entrepreneurial
risks. Companies are forced to invest heavily in research and engineering
personnel, but have few opportunities for outsized rewards.

  That's because Congress and the FCC set up an awkward scheme in which
everyone got a piece of the action but no one could make any money. Often
barred from carrying signals across long-distance boundaries, the Bells hand
off traffic to other long-distance carriers. CLECs rent lines from the
Bells. And Internet service providers end up doing costly customer service
and marketing to get people signed up in the first place. In short, as many
as four parties routinely battle for low- or negative-margin chunks of
$40-monthly bills.

  By summoning new competition and then mandating the rivals cooperate in
open access, the government effectively privatized the risks and socialized
the profits. By December, the Bells had signed up 1.8 million users and the
CLECs 600,000, combining for just 2.4 million DSL subscribers among the 120
million or so copper-connected U.S. homes and businesses.

  Cable modems, with 4.9 million subscribers at year-end, have done better,
but AOL Time Warner and AT&T, America's two cable behemoths, are bogged down
by the same open-access nonsense that plagues DSL. Over the past two years,
AT&T CEO Michael Armstrong acquired $140 billion in cable assets while
watching his company's $184 billion market capitalization plummet to $81
billion.

  Just last month the Federal Trade Commission ruled that AOL Time Warner
must offer "at least one non-affiliated cable broadband ISP [Internet
Service Provider] service on Time Warner's cable system before AOL itself
begins offering service, followed by two other non-affiliated ISPs within 90
days and a requirement to negotiate in good faith with others after that."
The nation's second-largest ISP, EarthLink, will now get access to AOL's
expensive cables pretty much for free.

  This regulatory morass treats the most dynamic, technically creative, and
transformative industry in the world economy as if it were some static
commodity market for corn or pork bellies.

  Mr. Chairman, in a recent speech you made the key point that innovation is

more important than price competition. When it comes to leading-edge
services and technologies, narrow price competition is almost meaningless.
Internet innovation means qualitative change, order-of-magnitude price
reductions and constantly changing services that always constitute
monopolies when first launched.

  No Internet advantage can last more than a couple of years. In 1999 and
2000, over 150 million kilometers of optical fiber were laid world-wide,
enough to stretch to the sun. Hundreds of billions of dollars have already
been invested by metropolitan fiber-optic network builders (Metromedia
Fiber, Level 3 Communications), optical hardware companies (Avanex, ONI,
Sorrento) and optical service providers (Yipes, Cogent, Sphera). These
companies are already rendering the metropolitan DSL debate moot with
thousand-fold increases in price performance over existing technology.
Similar breakthroughs are on the way in residential wireless. But none of
these deployments, including fiber to the home, can flourish under a regime
of forced sharing of entrepreneurial assets and profits.

  In this environment, let the Bells compete in long-distance and extort any
temporary profits they can from their local copper cages. Let the cable
companies capitalize on their advantage for the few years it will last.
Allow the infinite spectrum of air and fiber to be exploited in any way its
owners wish. Then, sit back, and nostalgically recall those early days of
the Internet, when we naively thought a 5% economic growth rate was really
something. The broadband economy needs a hero. President Bush and Mr.
Greenspan need a technology savior. You are the man best equipped to play
that role.

  ---

Paul A. Jackson
Special Assistant to the Chairman
Office of Chairman Michael K. Powell
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Suite 8B201
Washington, DC  20554
Phone: 202-418-1000
Fax: 202-418-2801
E-mail: pjackson@fcc.gov
Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/powell/

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named
recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney
work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have
received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender at (202) 418-1000 and delete this e-mail
message from your computer, Thank you.

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any
other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think
that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
sender. This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for
viruses and are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it
is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.


Attached are the most recent numbers.


I just tried to call you.  What is your parents address?

-e


Angela,

What is our password and login ID for this site?

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCulloch, Angela
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Biever, Jason; Brodeur, Stephane; Burnham, Steven; Cooke, Ian; Cowan, Mike; Croasdale, Duncan; Davies, Derek; Del Moral, Joseph; Di Stefano, Cyntia; Disturnal, John; Dorland, Chris; Downer, Robert; Draper, Lon; Drozdiak, Dean; Dunsmore, Paul; Fichten, Murray; Garvey, Jason; Greenizan, Bill; Hrap, Gerry; Kitagawa, Kyle; Lalani, Sean; Laporte, Nicole; Law, Michael; Lynn, Derek; Macphee, Mike; Messenger, John P.; Milnthorp, Rob; Richey, Cooper; Rodger, Paul; Sangwine, Howard; Savidant, Michael; Seminuk, Tyler; Taylor, Fabian; Taylor, Michael J.; Torres, Carlos; Watt, Ryan; Zufferli, John
Subject:

 << Message: PIRA's API Weekly Comment 09/18/01 >>  << Message: Monthly Gas Briefing: After the Shock - CERA Monthly Briefing >>  << Message: North American Power: New Attention on Security - CERA Alert >>  << Message: Canadian Gas Market: Canadian Outlook 2001 - CERA Conference Call Playback >>

Angela McCulloch
Enron Canada Corp.
Phone: (403) 974-6738
     Fax: (403) 974-6991


market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Andrew Hartshorn
09/21/2001 04:03 PM

Sent by:  Andrew Hartshorn

To:   nyiso_tech_exchange@list1.thebiz.net
cc:

Subject:  Re: Follow Up Material from 9/19 Pricing Issues Task Force
      meeting

Responding to Tim Lynch's comments:

The BME-SCD Operating Reserve Comparison includes the following note:
"Data for BME hours beginning 0:00 was not reliable, assumed all hours were
not short."

Please explain why data for this hour each day is unreliable and how it
impacts customer bills.  We are troubled that after operating a system for
nearly two years, problems remain that cause this magnitude of inaccuracy.

Tim Lynch
NYSEG Energy Trading
********************

As was explained at the PITF meeting the footnote in question related to a
data transferral problem between the NYISO and LECG that had NO IMPACT on
the BME prices, schedules or any billing matters.

To collate the data for the PITF meeting in a meaningful way it was
necessary to track the state of the 30 minute reserve constraint i.e. was
BME able to purchase sufficient 30 minute reserves to meet the pool 30
minute reserve requirement. LECG's information for the status of the 30
minute reserve constraint for hour beginning 0:00 was unreliable because of
data tranferral and processing problems so we made the very reasonable
assumption that in the middle of the night there is little chance that we
were reserve short. The footnote was entirely reasonable given the context
of the discussion for which the data was prepared.

Thank-you
Andrew Hartshorn
Principal
LECG, LLC.


Richard,
 Please change the confirm to provide for signature by both ENA and the
counterparty.

	Richard Deming@ENRON
	05/21/2001 03:09 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: WPS Energy Services Inc.

Dan,

Please find below details of Phy Gas deals with GTC agreements:


With the extension of the PRC to all organizations, questions have arisen
about the results of this process. This memo provides some details about the
PRC process.

First some context:  The key to Enron,s success is the increasing quality and
dedication of our talent.  As we continue to attract and retain the very best
people, we all have continued to raise the performance bar throughout the
organization.  At the core of our system are the following principles:

? Hire the best people.
? Provide challenging opportunities.
? Pay well ( and pay for performance (with bonuses based on merit, not
entitlement).
? Evaluate performance through a rigorous review process.
? Provide clear feedback and direction to employees.

The PRC is a critical component of our performance management system.  The
PRC is built on this foundation:

? 360 degree performance feedback.
? Review by a broad group, not just the supervisor.
? A relative ranking of performance across Enron to determine promotions and
to allocate bonus money.

In addition to understanding this broad philosophy, we all need to understand
the following details:

? Relative ranking.  Enron uses the descriptors &superior8, &excellent8,
&strong8, "satisfactory", &needs improvement8, and &issues8 to group all
employees.  This year, &relative to his/her peers8 precedes each of these
descriptors. This qualifier confirms what we have done and will continue to
do in practice; that is, evaluate individual performers against their peers.
It is possible, therefore, for someone to perform at the same or higher level
compared to prior periods, yet receive a lower rating for the current period
if other employees, performance raised the bar.
? Teamwork.  A relative ranking may invite the view that for one employee to
gain, others must suffer.  However, feedback is explicitly solicited on
teamwork when evaluating each individual,s performance.  Anyone who attempts
to gain by withholding information or refusing to collaborate with others in
the organization will suffer in a relative ranking on this key performance
criterion.
? Preferred distribution. In large part, the quality of our workforce has
been driven by our willingness to make tough decisions. We have consistently
captured business opportunities and overcome obstacles because we have made
the choices that had to be made in order to constantly improve our employee
talent base. The preferred distribution (5% superior, 30% excellent, 30%
strong, 20% satisfactory, and 15% needs improvement or issues) forces PRC
committee members to identify those who must improve in order to remain at
Enron as well as to single out top talent for special recognition. There is
some flexibility in the system, but every organization must ultimately face
this difficult question: have we achieved the highest level of performance or
are there still improvements that must be made? Few, if any, organizations
adhere exactly to the preferred distribution. Rather, they exercise informed
discretion in the individual categories and meet a distribution that reflects
their groups, overall effectiveness and need for improvement.
? Communicating Ratings. Everyone rated &satisfactory8 or below should know
his/her rating. Each organization has determined for itself whether to
communicate ratings of &strong8 and above.  In all cases, employees will
receive feedback about their performance against expectations, areas of
success, and areas that need improvement.

We hope this answers most of your questions about the PRC process.  We would
like your feedback and ideas on how to improve the PRC process going
forward.  Therefore, we will be conducting an eSpeak in the near future, and
there will be other methods we will create to let us know what you think.  In
the meantime, please feel free to consult with your HR Generalist if you have
any immediate questions, comments, or concerns.


We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement
dated 5/18/01 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be distributed to legal
and credit.


Conferring with Gorte, we need a new DASH for the India sale due to
1) the time since signing (5 months)
2) downward change in purchase price
3) general change in circumstances of Enron

In addition to updating the numbers (as we discussed this morning), we should include
an ownership structure diagram and a legal risk memo concerning what bankruptcy
related approvals are required (if any).

Whether or not Board approval is required is possibly an open issue. We will research.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Jennie & Jake arrive in Houston

Date:		6/5/2001
Time:		2:56 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Please see the attached file for the weekend notes of February 23rd and 24th.  If you received this message and no longer need to be included on the distribution, contact one of the members of the TW team.

Thanks,  Bert


Can we talk about this on Thursday?
----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 09/26/2000 05:59 PM -----

	Andrea Calo
	09/26/2000 04:54 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: London Short Form

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Calo/SA/Enron on 09/26/2000 06:57
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Kabel
09/26/2000 04:45 PM
Sent by: Jeff Kabel
To: Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Fabian Valle/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: London Short Form

I disagree (sorry).  Enron Europe is now in a "steady state"...that is that
the ENE name and contracting structures are now more understood.  But, when
they started in the market (at the stage we are now - according to Joe Gold)
they went with a short form developed by the commercial and legal teams that
mitigated risk but allowed initial transactions to be completed - after this,
the ISDA was pushed ahead.  He was very clear with us on this...

I do not want to drop this issue.  We need to get deals done and the
counterparties are not, at this stage, any more comfortable with the ISDA
document since I arrived here 3 years ago...

Thanks for the research.  I want to have a meeting on this...

Andrea Calo
09/15/2000 07:48 PM
To: Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Kabel/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fabian Valle/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: London Short Form

This morning I spoke with Paul Simons (our trading attorney in London) to
discuss the applicability of the one-off non-ISDA form I was told they were
using.  He explained that Enron London was actually either using the ISDA
form, or for markets that already had a form prior to Enron's entry in the
market, trying to adapt those forms as much as possible to incorporate the
ISDA terms and provisions.  He also stated that as a rule, whenever possible,
they try to push the ISDA document for financial transactions as well as try
to adapt the documentation for new physical transactions to an ISDA format.
As an example, he mentioned that Enron had  actively participated in the
drafting of a new standardized power document pursuant to new regulations in
force, and fostered the inclusion of terms contained in the ISDA form such as
netting and cross default provisions.

All Enron attorneys I have spoken to in Houston and London agree that the
ISDA form is the best document on the market because it provides for all
situations and risks and is designed to cover crossborder issues. In those
countries where Enron doesn't use the ISDA form, it is because a market (and
its corresponding documentation) already exists.  Enron in those situations
does what it can to try to adapt such pre-existing market conditions and
rules to more closely resemble the ISDA documentation.  Moreover such
documents have never been designed for cross border transactions.  He also
mentioned that typically international players are ISDA friendly and feel
comfortable using this document.
The recommendation is that we move forward with promoting the ISDA
documentation and work on getting the Argentine counterparties comfortable
with the form.

Andrea


Colette Morrow
141 N. Ridgeland 2N
Oak Park, IL 60302
addyee@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Colette Morrow


FYI.  Thought you'd be interested.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"hkd2061" <hkd2061@home.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:49 PM
To:	hduncan@caem.org
Subject:	CAEM Predictions 2002

Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets

Wow!  What a year 2001 has been for the supporters of energy competition.
For every good bit of news (Pat Wood, one of our heroes at CAEM, being
selected to head the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the
continuing progress that the Canadians - yes, the Canadians - have made
towards energy competition), we have had to bear one disaster and misstep
after another throughout the year.   Let's see, in December 2000, who
couldhave predicted..

1.  The tragic events of September 11th.
2.  The California implosion.
3.  Pennsylvania marketer retrenchment.
4.  Price volatility and high prices (but it could have been worse if Mother
Nature did not help out).
5.  Bush Energy Plan ignores meaningful restructuring.
6.  Enron collapse.
7.  FERC Blinks on Super RTO.
8.  Texas missteps in pilots for opening the market.
9.  No leadership emerged to meet the crisis in restructuring.

2001 was one heck of a year - but thankfully, probably the nadir of the
movement towards energy competition in North America.  As CAEM looks into
our crystal ball (natural gas fired, of course) for the coming year, we see
a better year.  Below are some of the predictions and responses from the
CAEM staff about what we expect to occur.  The responses below are primarily
concerned with electricity, but to a lesser extent, may be applied to
natural gas as well.

As always, do not bet the house on what we have to say.  We are just a
little think tank, kind of like the little engine that could.  And we can.
And we do.

Happy New Year!

The CAEM Staff

P.S. If you would like to add a prediction or two, please send an e-mail
with your name and contact information to Hope Duncan at hduncan@caem.org We
will post them to our web site - www.caem.org  Please identify which
question below is being addressed by your prediction.

 - CAEM PREDICTIONS IN 2002.doc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

March 23, 2001 5:00pm through March 26, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission CORPHOU-02B
Environments Impacted:  Corp Logins
Purpose: The SAM size on this DC has increased beyond recommended limits.
There is no real reason for us to keep this DC online anymore.
Backout: Bring back online
Contact(s):  Keith Meurer    713-853-1743

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Change VLANS for the EES networks at Ardmore
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Part of the re-design, due to problems with the OC3's
Backout: change vlans back to the old numbers
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add redundancy to the ETS server network
Environments Impacted:  ETS
Purpose: Currently the ETS server network 172.30.10.0 has no redundant links
the the routers. If one switch goes down the entire network goes down.
Backout: none
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/24/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at   9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at    10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Replace ENRON.COM edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Replace hardware with faster processing units.  IOS Software upgrade
to remove potential security vulnerability.
Backout: Put existing hardware back in production.
Contact(s):  John Shupak          713-853-7943
  Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  Market Data
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  9:45:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  7:45:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  3:45:00 AM London
Outage:  CQG_DDA Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  CQG Digital users
Purpose: Enable migration off of Legacy satellite systems.
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
Outage:  Cleanup CDPD (Air Card) Configuration
Environments Impacted:  Corp.
Purpose: Running out of available addresses for air cards. Clean up
configuration on CDPD router/ Change
the method used to translate the aircards IP addresses.
See Change Request  # JW918 for IP addresses.
Backout: apply old config
Contact(s):  Jon Werner    713-853-6742

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Master Server Move
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This server move is to replace the failed server that occurred last
weekend. The current location for the master machine online is in 3448. Since
it is on a development segment it has to be moved back into the production
area.
We will need only one hour to move the machine since it it is replacing a
1600 with a 1600. Rails and racking can be reused without rewiring anything.
Backout: Rerack in current location.
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves    713-345-3798

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  10:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 PM London
Outage:  OS and Disk upgrade, patch maintenance and migration to T-3 for
server titania.
Environments Impacted:  Oracle development
Purpose: Need for additional storage and improved performance.
Backout: shutdown the system
reconnect the old disks
restore the old OS from tape
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Q1) Are you going to be setting up an HPLC-FT-Waha ?

Q2) Roll up issues for positions

Does Tom want this part of the Market Area position - or separate from Market
Area?

Current
CPR  SITARA PORTFOLIO
N/A  Texas Position - Combined Region HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLC-IM Wellhead, HPLR-IM
Texas, ENA - IM Texas
TEXAS  Texas Position - ENA/HPLR  HPLR-IM Texas, ENA - IM Texas
HPLC   Texas Position - ENA - IM Texas ENA - IM Texas
HPLCWELL  Texas Position - HPLC-IM Wellhead HPLC-IM Wellhead
N/A  Texas Position - HPLR-IM Texas HPLR-IM Texas
TEXAS/HPLC Texas Position - Market Area Position HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLR-IM Texas,
ENA - IM Texas

Proposed additions or changes -

WAHA   Texas Position - HPLC-IM Waha  HPLC-IM Waha
TEXASREG Texas Position - Combined Region HLPC-IM HPLC, HPLC-IM Wellhead,
HPLR-IM Texas, ENA - IM Texas, HPLC-IM Waha

Rename TEXAS/HPLC in CPR to TEXASMKT - // need to know if this includes
HPLC-IM Waha - or should this be separate from Market Area

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           05/30/2000 11:50 AM

To: Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Intramonth Book

Please send me all forms/requests that need to be filled out to set up a new
Intramonth book for the Texas Desk.  Also, what do you think the timeline is
for getting the new book set up?

Dave


jhernan3
---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001
01:48 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kayne Coulter @ ECT                           04/10/2001 11:11 AM

To: John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Keller
Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dean
Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Dustin Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Andrea Dahlke/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: enpower user id's

Everyone needs to e-mail your enpower ID to Andrea Dahlke, please do so ASAP.

Thanks
Kayne


Here is today's copy of Bloomberg Power Lines. Adobe Acrobat Reader is
required to view the attached pdf file. You can download a free version
of Acrobat Reader at
   http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html

If you have trouble downloading the attached file it is also located at
   http://www.bloomberg.com/energy/daily.pdf

Don't forget to check out the Bloomberg PowerMatch West Coast indices, the
most accurate indices anywhere. Index values are calculated from actual trades
and can be audited by all PowerMatch customers.

Our aim is to bring you the most timely electricity market coverage in the
industry and we welcome your feedback on how we can improve the product further.

Bloomberg Energy Department

06/01 Bloomberg Daily Power Report

Table

                      Bloomberg U.S. Regional Electricity Prices
      ($/MWh for 25-50 MWh pre-scheduled packages, excluding transmission costs)

                            On-Peak
West Coast                   Index       Change       Low         High
 Mid-Columbia                168.13      +18.13      160.00      175.00
 Ca-Or Border                160.00      +20.00      160.00      170.00
 NP15                        159.82      +10.89      160.00      175.00
 SP15                        160.71      +10.80      130.00      185.00
 Ault Colorado               132.50      -4.17       130.00      185.00
 Mead                        186.00      +1.00       180.00      192.00
 Palo Verde                  187.41      +12.45      175.00      215.00
 Four Corners                178.33      +4.04       170.00      185.00

Mid-Continent
 ECAR                        21.84       +1.49       19.86       23.86
  East                       24.00       +1.00       23.00       25.00
  AEP                        21.75       +1.25       18.50       24.00
  West                       20.67       +2.34       19.00       22.00
  Central                    19.64       +1.04       17.00       22.00
  Cinergy                    19.64       +1.04       17.00       22.00
  South                      23.70       +2.95       21.50       28.00
  North                      23.50       +0.83       23.00       24.00
 Main                        21.05       +1.74       18.50       23.00
  Com-Ed                     20.67       +2.61       19.00       23.00
  Lower                      21.43       +0.87       18.00       23.00
 MAPP                        21.91       +1.27       18.25       23.50
  North                      21.13       +0.13       17.50       23.00
  Lower                      22.70       +2.41       19.00       24.00

Gulf Coast
 SPP                         23.13       +1.63       22.00       25.00
  Northern                   19.25       -0.25       18.00       22.00
 ERCOT                       38.00       +1.25       37.00       39.00
 SERC                        29.29       +1.22       27.97       31.22
  Va Power                   25.50       +3.00       25.00       26.00
  VACAR                      27.50       +5.00       26.50       28.50
  Into TVA                   23.70       +2.95       21.50       28.00
  Out of TVA                 27.58       +3.03       25.31       32.02
  Entergy                    28.00       +1.21       27.00       28.50
  Southern                   34.75       +3.35       33.00       36.00
  Fla/Ga Border              38.00       -10.00      37.50       39.50
 FRCC                        40.00       -23.33      39.00       41.00

East Coast
 NEPOOL                      37.50       +1.60       37.25       37.75
 New York Zone J             53.00       +6.00       50.50       55.50
 New York Zone G             45.75       +3.50       45.50       46.00
 New York Zone A             33.50       +3.00       33.25       33.75
 PJM                         25.51       +1.88       24.75       26.50
  East                       25.51       +1.88       24.75       26.50
  West                       25.51       +1.88       24.75       26.50
  Seller's Choice            25.01       +1.88       24.25       26.00
End Table

Western Spot Power Prices Rise With Weekend Risk Premium

     Los Angeles, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) -- Western day-ahead
power prices traded higher because of risk premiums, traders
said.
     The Bloomberg Mid-Columbia day-ahead heavy load index price
increased an average of $18.13 a megawatt-hour to $168.13 amid
trades at $160.00-$175.00. Light-load energy sold at $100.00-
$110.00, an average of $30.56 more than equivalent trades made
yesterday for delivery today.
     Traders said that power prices typically rise on Friday
because Monday begins a new week and demand for energy increases.
     "Prices also increase because there is some uncertainty of
what could happen over the next three days, a unit might trip or
the weather could suddenly change,'' said one Northwest trader.
      In the Southwest, power prices climbed an average of $12.45
at the Palo Verde switchyard to a Bloomberg average of $1187.41
amid trades in the $175.00-$215.00 range.
     Temperatures in Phoenix were forecast to reach 105 degrees
on Sunday and increasing two degrees to 107 degrees on Monday.
     Traders said this should keep power prices elevated at Palo
Verde and at the Four Corners trading point in New Mexico.
     Four Corners heavy load energy traded at a Bloomberg average
of $178.33, gaining $4.04 more than yesterday.
     According to Belton, Missouri-based Weather Derivatives
Inc., forecast temperatures in the Pacific Northwest would
average 4.0 degrees above normal over the next 6-10 days and 2.9
degrees above normal in the Southwest.

-Robert Scalabrino

Northeast Spot Power Prices Rise With Natural Gas, Weekend Risk

     Philadelphia, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) -- Following a two-
week decline driven primarily by mild temperatures and healthy
generation levels, day-ahead power prices in the Northeast U.S.
rebounded this morning amid rising fuel costs and weekend risk
premiums.
     Traders said natural gas futures on the New York Mercantile
Exchange were "hardly bullish, but enough to spark a slight turn-
around" in the power market.
As of 1 p.m. local time, the Henry Hub front-month contract
traded as high as $4.000 per million British thermal units, which
is 8.6 cents greater than yesterday's close, yet 94.9 cents below
the contract's three-month historical average.
     "At this time of year, when generation is plentiful and
weather is a non-issue, power prices will jump on the most
insignificant of news," said one Northeast trader. "These
[natural] gas prices don't pose any threat, they just lend some
fundamental justification for a run-up."
     Peak power scheduled for Monday delivery to the Western Hub
of the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection was
assessed $1.88 higher, at a Bloomberg volume-weighted index of
$25.51 per megawatt hour. While up on the day, next-day values
remain $18.75, or 42.4 percent, below the three-month historical
mean.
     In the New York Power Pools, next-day power prices climbed as
a function of weekend risk premiums. Traders said generators
typically place higher bids for Monday power because of the
uncertainties associated with speculating weather and load
forecasts 3 days in advance.
     Zone J was discussed at $53.00, though no trades were
reported. Zones A and G jumped $3.00 and $3.50, respectively, to
$35.00 and $47.25 indices.

-Karyn Rispoli

Southern Demand, Forwards Drive Midwest Spot Power Prices Up

     Cincinnati, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) -- Prices rose today
for peak power delivered Monday in the Mid-Continent U.S. in line
with short-term over-the-counter values and demand from the
South, traders said.
     The Bloomberg index price for power delivered Friday into
the Cincinnati-based Cinergy Corp. transmission system climbed
$1.04 to $19.64 a megawatt-hour, with trades ranging from $22.00
when the market opened to $17.00 after options expired.
     "When the bal(ance of)-week market came out at $23-$24,
people tried to hold the dailies up at that level," an ECAR
trader said. "There just weren't any fundamentals there to
support the market though, so it crashed."
     In its seven-day forecast, Belton, Missouri-based Weather
Derivatives Inc. predicted high temperatures would average 7
degrees Fahrenheit below normal in Cincinnati.
     Traders said they expected cool weather to keep prices in
the low-$20 range through next week, while uncertain weather
forecasts limited price movement and activity in over-the-counter
contracts.
     "Weather forecasters are having trouble predicting things
three days out, let alone 30. Nobody wants to take any serious
positions because of it," one trader said.
     In Mid-America Interconnected Network trading, for-Monday
power at the Chicago-based Commonwealth Edison hub sold $2.61
higher on average at $19.00-$23.00 as exports to the west
increased, traders said.
     Power in the lower half of the region sold 87 cents higher
at $18.00-$23.00, also boosted by exports.
     In the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool, traders said prices in
northern areas were little changed with stable temperatures,
rising 13 cents on average to $17.50-$23.00, while southern MAPP
spot prices climbed $2.41 to $19.00-$24.00 with demand from the
Southwest Power Pool.
     Peak Monday power in SPP sold at $18.00-$28.00, up $1.63 on
average from yesterday.
     "A little bit of stuff going south is all that propped
things up today," a MAPP trader said. "With things this cool
though, we're not going to see much of a market anytime soon.
Heck, I had to use the heater in my car this morning."

-Ken Fahnestock

Most Southeast Power Prices Rise Amid Weekend Risk, Weather

     Atlanta, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) - U.S. Southeast spot
electricity prices for delivery Monday were mostly higher today
because sellers expected a premium price to sell power three
days in advance, traders said.
     Peak power for Monday delivery into the Tennessee Valley
Authority transmission grid traded at $21.50-$28.00 a megawatt
hour, with a Bloomberg index rising $2.95 from yesterday to
$23.70.
     "Prices are rising because it's a typical Monday, prices
usually fall on the weekend because of businesses and schools
closed, and then trade higher for Monday with everything re-
opening,'' said one Southeast marketer.
     In the Nashville, Tennessee area, temperatures that were
to reach 73 degrees Fahrenheit today, were expected to rise to
82 degrees for Monday.
     The Bloomberg Southeast regional average price gained 56
cents from yesterday to a Bloomberg index of $28.63 amid trades
at $21.50-$39.50.
     Traders said that Entergy was purchasing power from the
Southwest Power Pool and paying premium prices because of
transmission constraints along with zero availability
transmission capacity.
     In the Southern section of the Southwest Power Pool,
trades for Southern SPP increased $3.50 to a Bloomberg index of
$27.00, with sales completed at Entergy between $26.00-$28.00.
     Forecasters call for temperatures in the Southeast to
average about 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit below normal over the next
seven days.
     On the New Orleans-based Entergy Corp. grid, peak power
for Monday traded between $27.00-$28.50, and averaged $28.00,
$1.21 higher than yesterday.
     "Power prices next week will depend on what the weather
related demand is,'' said one Southeast marketer.
     In the Virginia-Carolina region, peak power increased
$5.00 to a Bloomberg index of $27.50, with trades completed
between $26.50-$28.50.

-Robert Scalabrino

U.K. Short-Term Power Prices Fall on Increased Selling

     London, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) -- U.K. power prices
tumbled in lackluster trade today as participants sold contracts
deemed over-valued, traders said.
     July baseload traded 20 pence lower following trades at 17.55
pounds a megawatt-hour. August baseload traded at 17.60 pounds a
megawatt-hour, 25 pence lower than yesterday.
     "If you've got day-ahead trading at 17 pounds in May, then
people are thinking July and August are definitely over-priced,"
one trader said.
     Participants, unsure of new price levels following the New
Electricity Trading Arrangements sold the summer month contracts
today as they compared them to lower day-ahead and week-ahead
prices, traders said.
     Day-ahead baseload for Monday last traded at 17 pounds a
megawatt-hour, 1 pound lower than yesterday.
     The contract fell on expectations temperatures, expected to
fall over the weekend, would begin to rise again on Monday,
stifling heating demand, traders said.
     Week 23 traded 70 pence lower than yesterday following trades
at 17 pounds a megawatt-hour.
     Traders said the Sizewell B power plant restart delay had
little impact on prices amid sufficient supply.

-Amal Halawi

Nordic Power Prices Gain Ahead of Holiday in Limited Trade

     Lysaker, Norway, June 1 (Bloomberg Energy) -- Electricity
prices on the Nordic Power Exchange in Lysaker, Norway, rose today
as participants purchased power in order to cover their contracted
requirements ahead of the long-weekend Whit holiday on Monday,
traders said.
     Week 23 closed at 206.18 Norwegian kroner a megawatt-hour,
gaining 2.18 after 297 megawatts traded. Week 24 jumped 3.5 kroner
to 210.50 kroner a megawatt-hour with 202 megawatts exchanged.
     Prices rose as participants bought contracts in an attempt to
close positions and minimize the risk of changing weather
conditions over the long-weekend, traders said.
     Scandinavian rainfall was forecast to remain above average
over the next 5 days, according to Weather Services Corp. in the
U.S. Still, worries about limited hydro-supply persist following
scarce snow accumulation and melting this year, traders said.
     Saturday's system area average price was set at 188.71 kroner
a megawatt-hour, 17.89 kroner lower than today's spot price,
because of lower industrial demand over the weekend. Traders said
the price was in line with expectations.
     Winter-2, 2001 rose 0.65 kroner to 220.25 kroner a megawatt-
hour after 89.00 megawatts were sold. Winter-1, 2002 jumped 1.25
kroner to 222.25 kroner a megawatt-hour.
     Traded volumes on Nordpool rose to 1,292 gigawatt-hours
generation today from 1,030 gigawatt-hours yesterday.
     Still, activity was lackluster, traders said as many
participants were away from their trading desks ahead of Monday's
holiday.
     The Nordpool Exchange will be closed on Monday June 4 and is
scheduled to reopen on Tuesday.

-Amal Halawi
-0- (BES) Jun/01/2001 19:17 GMT

 - daily.pdf


Observations on the California Energy Crisis
The White House Writers Group
January 31st

Gray Davis has announced that he will soon announce two energy czars to lead
the state through the current crisis. ?Logical candidates include: Laurel and
Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Beavis and Butthead, and Siegfried and Roy.

The environmentalist Green Party is well-named. ?Thanks to its role in
blocking construction of new power plants, Californians are forking over
plenty of green for energy.

California?s power industry is very Kennedyesque. ?Their message to consumers
is, "Ask not what your energy company can do for you; ask what you can do for
your energy company."

Congress might get involved in California?s energy crisis. ?There?s nothing a
drowning victim needs more than having an anchor thrown to him.

It?s one thing for California politicians trying to solve the energy problem
to go back to the drawing board, but do they have to ask taxpayers to buy
them a new one?

In California, lawmakers are now getting down to details. ?The latest debate
involves what to name the bonds the state will issue to help bail out the
utilities. ?Proposals on the table include: ?Blackout Bonds;Bailout Bonds;
Davis Debts; Blunder Bonds; Fiasco Funds.

###


Vince-

Thank you for coordinating, indeed picking up, the tab for SAS this
year. Please let me know if you need me to help you with securing
contributions from any of the desks.

Clayton


Why is Mr. Frank Alexander interested intalking to me ? Furthermore who is he ?


Pam:
Here is the latest version of the presentation.  Let me know when you are
going to download the presentation into the system.  Thanks
Ben


Elizabeth Serralheiro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/06/99 09:42 AM
To: John Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Frumkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, vcferraz@elektro.com.br, Sara
Shackleton@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Gavino/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Ann
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gisele S
Braz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ana Cristina
Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cecilia
Morellato/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA Legal Management Meeting report's

Please send me your updated report today, not later than 5:00 p.m.

Regards,
Elizabeth.


Please be informed, Steve will have extended Staff Meeting discussions on
Wednesday, October 25, 9:00a - 10:30a in EB-47C2.

Dave Schafer will join Steve during the second half of the session to talk
about the Performance Review Process.

Please mark your calendars.

adr


The two cheap guys -  Tycholiz and Lavorato

Change Milnthorp to Calger.


You and Frank can best decide how to organize this.  I am comfortable with
your decisions, so feel free to go ahead with this.  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           02/15/2001 04:47 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janet De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Norma Yeverino/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Seleznov/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Group Split

Sally,
If it is ok with you, Frank and I would like to split the group in the
following manner.

Frank would primarily take care of the following groups:
Bob Hall
Jeff Gosset
Stacey White
Sheri Thomas

I would primarily take care of the following groups:
Leslie Reeves
Shona Wilson
Beth Apollo
James Scribner
Mary Solmonson

Please let us know if this is ok with you and we will announce it
accordingly.
Thanks,
hgm


Preempt me, please!

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/13/2000 06:22 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Two Governor's Press Releases--More Courage from the Capitol

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/13/2000 06:18
PM ---------------------------

"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net> on 09/13/2000 06:10:16 PM
Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
To: "Baker Carolyn (E-mail)" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Carlson
(E-mail)" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton (E-mail)" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Curtis Kebler (E-mail)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Keane
(E-mail)" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "David Parquet (E-mail)"
<dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Duane Nelsen (E-mail)" <duanenelsen@msn.com>, "Ed
Tomeo (E-mail)" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Edward Maddox (E-mail)"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Eileen Kock (E-mail)" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ellery Bob (E-mail)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Escalante Bob (E-mail)"
<riobravogm@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa (E-mail)"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott (E-mail)"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smunty-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jim
Willey (E-mail)" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco (E-mail)"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout
(E-mail)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kent Fickett
(E-mail)" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Marty McFadden (E-mail)" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos
(E-mail)" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Robert Lamkin (E-mail)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)"
<rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond
Aschehoug (E-mail)" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall (E-mail)"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde (E-mail)" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Sandi McCubbin (E-mail)" <smccubbi@ees.enron.com>, "Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>
cc: "Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net>
Subject: Two Governor's Press Releases

GOVERNOR DAVIS PRESSES FERC FOR ACTION ON WHOLESALE POWER RATES: Calls on
Federal Regulators to Reduce Prices, Issue Refunds

GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES KAHN CHAIR OF THE GOVERNOR'S CLEAN ENERGY GREEN TEAM

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
PR00:238
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 12, 2000

GOVERNOR DAVIS PRESSES FERC FOR ACTION ON WHOLESALE POWER RATES
Calls on Federal Regulators to Reduce Prices, Issue Refunds

SAN DIEGO - At a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) hearing today
in San Diego, Governor Gray Davis reiterated his call to federal regulators
to intervene "to the fullest extent possible" to lower electricity prices in
California.

"FERC bears responsibility to ensure that a workably competitive market
exists before California consumers and California's economy are subjected to
unconstrained, market-based electricity prices," said Governor Davis in a
statement read by Energy Oversight Board Chairman Michael Kahn.
"Consequently, I renew my prior request that the Commission act with utmost
speed to intervene to the fullest extent possible to restore wholesale
prices to fair levels and to remedy harms that have resulted from the
exercise of market power."

Governor Davis noted that he and state lawmakers have taken dramatic action
in recent weeks to provide rate relief. "While these actions should provide
short-term rate predictability and longer-term benefits to customers in
terms of improved supplies, the fundamental problem of exorbitant wholesale
prices still exists and remains the responsibility of FERC to address," said
the governor. "No combination of state actions can substitute for federal
action to ameliorate the problems of California's wholesale markets."

Governor Davis has taken the following actions in reaction to rising
electricity prices in San Diego:

On June 14, he called for emergency reduction of electricity use by all
state facilities in the San Francisco Bay area in response to electricity
emergency and rolling blackouts.

On June 15, he called on chairpersons of the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) to analyze the conditions that led to electricity shortages in the San
Francisco Bay area the previous day, including a statewide perspective on
the price and delivery of electricity. Report was completed, submitted to
the governor and released on August 2.

On July 27, 2000, Governor Davis called on federal and state regulators to
take swift action to extend the caps on wholesale electric rates in
California and provide San Diego ratepayers with million of dollars in
refunds.

In letters written by the governor to two state regulatory agencies and two
California-based panels charged with overseeing California's power market,
he called for a coordinated state effort to urge federal regulators to take
strong measures to reduce power rates in both the short- and long-term.

On August 2, 2000, Governor Davis issued three Executive Orders designed to
reduce energy consumption by state government and speed up the time it takes
new power generating facilities to win approval from state agencies.

On August 9, 2000, Governor Davis called on the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) to establish a two-year plan that would cut electricity rates by
nearly half for residential and business customers of San Diego Gas &
Electric.

The governor also reached an agreement with the California Grocers
Association that will save enough electricity to provide power to between
50,000 and 60,000 homes during periods of peak demand, as grocers agreed to
reduce power consumption by 10 percent during Stage One emergencies.

On August 10, 2000, Governor Davis wrote a letter to President Clinton
urging him to expedite FERC's investigation to determine whether current
electric rates in San Diego were unjust.

On August 22, 2000, Governor Davis called on President Clinton to release
emergency funds from the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
to the state to help low-income Californians pay their rapidly-rising
electricity bills.

On August 23, 2000, President Clinton responded to Governor Davis' request
by releasing $2.6 million in emergency funds to help low-income Southern
Californians cope with the surge in their electricity bills. The President
also asked federal regulators to speed up their investigation into the
operation of U.S. power markets and urged the Small Business Administration
to use its credit programs to help small firms hurt by the price increases.

On August 23, 2000, Governor Davis reached agreement with legislators on
legislation to provide relief to San Diego ratepayers. The governor signed
two bills into law on September 6, 2000.

Please see attached letter (below).

# # #

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

STATEMENT OF GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS

TO THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION CONCERNING ITS INVESTIGATION OF
WHOLESALE PRICE ESCALATION IN CALIFORNIA

The Summer of 2000 has confronted California with an electricity crisis that
seriously threatens the safety, health and well being of citizens and
businesses throughout the state. At the heart of the crisis is the
extraordinary run up in prices for wholesale electric energy and ancillary
services, accompanied by deteriorating service and reliability. In San
Diego, electric customers' bills have more than doubled this summer,
threatening permanent harm to businesses and the health and welfare of
residential customers in the warm southern climate. All remaining California
electric consumers are faced with similar prospects as their legislated rate
freeze periods come to an end. In San Francisco we saw rolling blackouts for
the first time in our history.

As soon as the dimensions of the crisis became evident, I directed
California regulators, including the Public Utilities Commission and the
Electricity Oversight Board, and the Independent System Operator, to take
immediate steps to identify and implement specific measures to mitigate the
damage, including restoring price caps at Summer 1999 levels. I am happy to
report that those measures have been adopted, although not without
considerable resistance from self-interested parties.

In recent weeks, I have worked with the California Legislature to enact
further relief within the existing framework of options now available to the
state. These include provisions to stabilize retail rates, expedite
generation licensing where possible, implement targeted demand reduction and
demand response and remove constraints in transmission and distribution
systems. I have also established a task force comprised of key state
officials which is developing measures to increase energy efficiency and
alternative supplies and to expedite permitting by state agencies.

While these actions should provide short-term rate predictability and
longer-term benefits to customers in terms of improved supplies, the
fundamental problem of exorbitant wholesale prices still exists and remains
the responsibility of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to address.
No combination of state actions can substitute for federal action to
ameliorate the problems in California's wholesale markets.

A joint report submitted to me on August 2nd by the Chairman of the
California Electricity Oversight Board and the President of the California
Public Utilities Commission concluded that exorbitant wholesale prices in
California result from wholesale market dysfunction and the exercise of
market power by sellers. Subsequent reports by the Market Analysis
Department and the Market Surveillance Committee of the California
Independent System Operator reach the same conclusions. Subsequent behavior
of wholesale electric prices during August confirms their conclusions, and
subjects California to further economic damage. While I remain hopeful that
California wholesale markets may ultimately become competitive and become
capable of serving the interests of consumers and the public, I cannot and
will not accept the liabilities to California that result from the current
situation for even a short period. I intend to take any and all steps
necessary to restore economic stability to the electric service
infrastructure of California.

FERC bears the responsibility under its organic act to assure just and
reasonable wholesale electric rates. FERC bears responsibility to ensure
that a workably competitive market exists before California consumers and
California's economy are subjected to unconstrained, market-based
electricity prices. Consequently, I renew my prior request that the
Commission act with utmost speed to intervene to the fullest extent possible
to restore wholesale prices to fair levels and to remedy harms that have
resulted from the exercise of market power.

###

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
A00:245
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 12, 2000

GOVERNOR DAVIS NAMES KAHN CHAIR OF THE GOVERNOR'S CLEAN ENERGY GREEN TEAM
SACRAMENTO - Governor Gray Davis today announced the appointment of Michael
A. Kahn as chairman of the newly-created Governor's Clean Energy Green Team.
The Team was created by Governor Davis' signing of AB 970 by Assemblywoman
Denise Moreno Ducheny (D-San Diego) on Wednesday.

Mr. Kahn, 51, of San Francisco, is the chairman of the California
Electricity Oversight Board, and he also serves as vice-chair of the
California Commission on Judicial Performance. He has been senior partner
and head of litigation at Folger Levin & Kahn LLP since 1979. Mr. Kahn has
held numerous state and federal government appointments and assignments over
the last 15 years.

Mr. Kahn is the author of several articles and reports on litigation
practice and Supreme Court history. He is a magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa
graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles. Mr. Kahn also earned
master of arts and juris doctorate degrees from Stanford University, where
he was an editor of the Law Review. After graduation, he served for a year
as a law clerk to Judge Ben C. Duniway of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
in San Francisco.

The signing of AB 970 established the Governor's Clean Energy Green Team,
which works to streamline the process of creating new power plants to ensure
that an adequate supply of power will exist to make a deregulated
marketplace work. The Team does this by working with local governments,
identifying environmental impacts, developing recommendations for low
interest financing programs for renewable energy and obtaining input on
natural gas supply, emission offsets and water supply.

Members do not receive a salary. This position does not require Senate
confirmation.

# # #

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Edson + Modisette
Associate
925 L Street Suite 1490
Sacramento CA 95814
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/12/2000
03:10 PM ---------------------------

Janet Butler
04/12/2000 02:50 PM
To: Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Bily/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack
Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna
Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christi
Culwell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron, Lou Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Blair
Lichtenwalter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva
Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret
Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donna Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Dave
Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike G Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, James Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Edith Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Denis
Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Van Norden/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donald Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jody
Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amber
White/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michele Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: OCS Final Rule, Order 639

Regulations Under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Governing the
Movement of Natural Gas on Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf, RM99-5

The final rule is attached - 84 pages

Executive Summary
The Final Rule was issued April 10, 2000 and becomes effective 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.

The purpose of the final rule is to establish a data base as a foundation for
identifying discrimination with OCS gas service providers.  The reporting
will include affiliations and conditions of service.  This is a procedural
rule - reporting only.  The rule only applies to gas pipelines - FERC found
transportation for oil pipelines to be just and reasonable.  The Commission
is acting in part as a response to the ruling in Sea Robin in which the court
directed FERC to reconsider the manner in which it applied its primary
function test to Sea Robin's predominantly offshore system.

NOPR was issued on June 30, 1999.  The Commission believes that the new OCSLA
reporting requirements mirror certain existing NGA reporting requirements.
Salient points of the final rule are:

Exemptions
Service providers that confine their operations to moving their own gas or
that of a single shipper are exempt from reporting; add new section
330.0(a)(1) and (2)   Note:  reporting exemption turns on identity of service
provider and its shippers - not type of service provided.
Gas service providers that are regulated by FERC under NGA are exempt from
OCSLA reporting; add new section (330.3(a)(4)
Exempts lines that feed into a facility where gas is first collected,
separated, dehydrated or processed from OCSLA reporting requirements; add new
section 330.3(a)(3).

Reporting Requirements
If an NGA-regulated company's system includes OCS facilities that are not
subject to NGA (gathering/production lines), the company must submit an OCSLA
report covering its non-NGA facilities
Reclassified facilities will no longer be subject to NGA reporting
requirements but will be subject to OCSLA requirements. (Shippers  no longer
have protection against the exercise of market power afforded by the NGA).
Service provider must list all of its affiliates defined as engaged in the
exploration, development, production, processing, transportation, marketing,
consumption or sale of gas need be identified in the report; new section
330.2(a)(6)
Reporting Updates restricted to four times per year.
Reports will be based on conditions on the first day of the first full
calendar quarter that begins after the effective date of this rule; reports
due on the first business day after the close of the quarter.  Providers will
have more than one full quarter in which to prepare their initial OSCLA report
Providers will be required to submit a description of their operations as
they stand on the first day of each calendar quarter, e.g. describing the
provider's status on one particular day; report due on first business day of
the subsequent quarter (e.g. filing due April 1 will describe operations as
they stood on January 1).  If the operations are identical on the first and
last days of any given quarter, provider need not submit an update the
following quarter
Not necessary to file contracts but must provide table of shippers and
services; new section 330.2(b)
Retaining requirement for alternative reporting for OCS companies who do not
provide service under formal contracts, must provide information sufficient
to derive rates charged and conditions applicable for service between two
points; new section 330.2(b)(9)
OCSLA Reporting Form available via Internet  http://www.ferc.fed.us or the
public reference room
Providers new to provisions have 90 days to prepare and submit OCSLA report
(NOPR had stipulated 60 days).


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:29 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
01/05/2000 08:39 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vincent Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES, Ravi
Thuraisingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross
Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Sergeev/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samer Takriti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martina
Angelova/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Chahal/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Research Group "Millenium" Party -- Address Correction

Here is a party invitation with updated address.    The party will be at 3421
Cason.    This is 2.5 blocks West of Buffalo Speedway and 1 Block north of
Holcomb (
Bellaire) Blvd.

Directions from major freeways:

From Southwest Freeway (59):
 Exit on Buffalo Speedway and go south.  (Greenway plaza is on the north side
of the freeway.)
 Pass through stoplights on Bissonette, Sunset, Rice, and University.
 Turn right on Cason  (the last small street before the next stoplight, which
is at Holcomb Blvd.)
 House is on your left in 2.5 blocks.

From  West Loop 610 :
 Exit on Bellaire Blvd. and go east  (inside the loop).
 After you pass the stoplights at Auden and at Edloe street,  start watching
for JiffyLube on your right.
 When you near JiffyLube, turn LEFT onto Sewanee Street.
 At first intersection, turn Right onto Cason
 House is on your right.

 If you miss the turn at JiffyLube, just turn LEFT at the stoplight at
Buffalo and turn left again onto Cason.


Dear Family,

Just for everyone's information, there is no special dress code.  Dinner
will remain casual to casual/chic, as usual.  We have scheduled Allen Ross
to be there early in the evening to help us take a few very special group
photographs.  Because of this we are providing VERY SIMPLE NON-SCAREY
Halloween costumes for the wee ones to put on over their casual attire for
photos.

I don't want to make this a difficult or painful process and the costumes
will hopefully make it fun.  The most important photograph I am hoping to
get is with "Pop-Pop and his six great grandchildren."  If that goes well,
Pop-Pop will step out and Mamia and Papi will step in quickly to be
photographed with all of their precious grandchildren.  Then depending on
whether the wee ones can handle it and don't have melt down, we would also
love for the five children and spouses to quickly join in for a larger group
shot.  If it works, it works...and it doesn't, it doesn't.  NO BIG DEAL!
We'll just see how it goes.

If all goes well, once we have finished with our special photo session, any
of you who may want individual photographs taken are on your own to do so as
you wish.

I hope this answers all of the questions Barb's early e-mail might have
sparked.  If not, call me.

Love, Mamia

-----Original Message-----
From: Barbara VanDerVliet [mailto:barblpl@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Christophe Vermeil; Robyn Vermeil; Jose Luis Vittor; Courtenay
Herrold; David Herrold; Heather Herrold; Robert Herrold; Kenneth L. Lay;
Linda Lay; Mark Kenneth Lay; Natalie Lay; Elizabeth Lay Vittor
Cc: jessica
Subject: Furniture!

Hello everyone,
Mrs. Lay is taking inventory and organising her
furniture.  She has asked me email everyone with the
request for everyone to photogragh all furniture that
is not your own.  This means that if you have any of
hers or your fellow siblings furniture she would luike
a photo for our records by the 12th of October.
I have a digital camera or a polaroid that you can
borrow.  If you have no foriegn furniture please reply
with a "Nope, Don't have any!" by friday October 5th.

Also on a side note, Please be on time for the family
dinner on the 12th of October.  We will be taking the
kiddy christmas shot before dinner.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com


trader wrote deal down wrong in log.  delivery point is mid c I will change
in a few minutes.


Zach,

Can you get together Friday morning to go over the basics of what we do?  I will try to find some old class materials for you to review as well.
I will let you know when and where tomorrow.

Thanks,
Kam


After speaking with George Phillips yesterday about SCE's counterclaim
against EES and EEMC regarding underreporting of usage to the ISO, I think
there may be some internal confusion (of which I may have contributed to)
about the nature of SCE's counterclaim.

As I understand, from my review of certain documents received from SCE in
response to our data requests, review of an "Executive Summary" prepared by
George Phillips on the issue, and from my conversation with him yesterday,
EES and EEMC, as a result of some problems with their settlement system, did
indeed underreport customers' usage to the ISO during the time period
claimed by SCE.  This has, I believe, resulted in two separate (although
interrelated) points of contention with SCE -- of which only one is the
subject matter of its counterclaim.

First, the underreporting resulted in Unaccounted For Energy (UFE) charges
to the market.  In correspondence sent by SCE to EEMC and EES during the
last quarter of 2001, it appears that SCE was calculating the "cost to the
market" from the  EES/EEMC underreporting by applying the hourly day ahead
market clearing price to the  individual  hourly variances.  This cost to
the market is overestimated, however, as SCE failed to take into account the
fact that the ISO nets underreported amounts against overreported accounts
to get a net amount of underreporting.  This underreported amount is then
allocated to all providers of physical load within a service territory
through the assessment of UFE charges.  Thus whatever the ultimate cost was
determined to be, SCE would not be allocated the entire amount.

Second, the underreporting of usage to the ISO results, according to SCE, in
SCE paying EES and EEMC a PX credit for energy they never purchased.  This
claim is separate and apart from what SCE claims EES/EEMC cost the market in
the way of UFE charges.  What SCE is saying is that it believes that EES and
EEMC only purchased on behalf of their customers the amount of energy which
they reported to the ISO.  EES' and EEMC's customers actually used more than
the amount which EES and EEMC reported.  SCE calculated the PX credit based
on the amount used, not reported. It is SCE's claim that EES and EEMC are
not entitled to a PX credit on the delta as the market, not EES and EEMC,
purchased those volumes.

It is only the second point of contention which is the subject matter of
SCE's counterclaim.  SCE is alleging that it should not have to pay a PX
credit to EES and EEMC for volumes that EES and EEMC did not purchase.  SCE
is claiming that we only purchased the amount we reported to the ISO.  While
SCE may believe that it should not have to pay any UFE charges as the result
of  EES/EEMC underreporting, the UFE charges are not the basis of its
counterclaim.

Based on the above analysis, I think that the most critical piece of
information  to refute the counterclaim is that, despite the underreporting
of volumes to the ISO, EES and EEMC actually purchased on behalf of their DA
customers those customers' full usage. Can we make such claim?  and do we
have data to back it up?

Jeanne Bennett


Agree with these comments given that much of the regulatory oversight is now
with the FSA.  I would also support the application.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jerry.delmissier@barclayscapital.com
> [SMTP:Jerry.delmissier@barclayscapital.com]
> Sent:	12 October 2001 11:46
> To:	RPICKEL@isda.org; BOARD@isda.org
> Cc:	MCUNNINGHAM@isda.org; esebton@isda-eur.org; rmetcalfe@isda-eur.org
> Subject:	RE: Bank of England Application
>
> bob,
> i am a supporter.  in our dealings we see the bank as a growing user of
> derivatives and feel comfortable with the separation from the FSA.  the
> new
> role the bank plays is more akin to what some of the other central banks
> in
> europe do rather than the fed or boj.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Pickel [mailto:RPICKEL@isda.org]
> Sent: 12 October 2001 16:59
> To: ISDA BOARD
> Cc: Mary Cunningham; Emmanuelle Sebton; Richard Metcalfe
> Subject: Bank of England Application
>
>
> Shortly before the teleconference Board meeting two weeks ago we received
> an
> application from the Bank of England for subscriber membership. When we
> have
> considered central banks or government agencies for membership in the
> past,
> consideration has focused on the nature of the applicant's derivatives
> activities, its regulatory role and the type of information they are
> likely
> to obtain from ISDA. Because of their derivatives activities, we have
> generally admitted these applicants (e.g., the Kingdoms of Belgium,
> Denmark
> and Sweden, the Reserve Banks of South Africa and New Zealand). We have
> even
> admitted the Bank for International Settlements as a member. In general,
> we
> let them know that they may not be able to receive the full range of ISDA
> materials (e.g., draft comment letters or position papers) and that there
> may be a need to exclude them from certain committees or discussions.
>
> In previous Board discussions, a higher degree of concern has been
> expressed
> if, theoretically, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of
> England or similarly influential central banks were to apply for
> membership.
> These central banks typically have a greater degree of involvement in the
> regulatory debates (particularly on capital) and are better positioned to
> influence the process.
>
> Since some of those previous debates, the regulatory role of the Bank of
> England has diminished and the role of the Financial Services Authority
> has
> correspondingly increased. The Bank of England still plays the traditional
> central bank roles of controller of the money supply, dealing in the
> market
> and lender of last resort, but the supervisory role has shifted to the
> FSA.
>
> In light of these developments, but recognizing the concerns previously
> expressed on central bank membership, I would appreciate your views on the
> application of the Bank of England. We have also had overtures from the
> Hong
> Kong Monetary Authority regarding membership although we have not received
> an application.
>
> Please share your views with the other members of the Board.
>
> Bob
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information about Barclays Capital, please
> visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
> Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
> message.  Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
> it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
> caused by viruses being passed.  Any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
> Barclays Group.  Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
> Group for operational or business reasons.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------


Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/06/2001 02:08 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Friday

---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 02/06/2001 02:08
PM ---------------------------

"Ferrarini S (Sheila)" <SFerrarini@equiva.com> on 02/06/2001 02:07:55 PM
To: "'shanna.husser@enron.com'" <shanna.husser@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Friday

Hey Shanna -

How was your weekend in Louisiana?  Did you and Eric have fun?  I'm emailing
because last weekend I was really sick and had to cancel dinner and dancing.
I went to the doctor and found out I had pneumonia.  I rescheduled dinner
for this Friday, so if you and Eric are free, I would love for the two of
you to come.  Dinner is at Lupe Tortilla at 8:30.  We'll probably go dancing
afterwards!

Let me know if you guys can come.

Take care -
Sheila Ferrarini
Exchange Analyst
EQUIVA Trading Company
Refined Products Inventory Management
Tel:  (713) 277-6236
Fax: (713) 246-8753


Hey Matt.  Sorry about not getting back to you sooner.  I probably won't move
for another 9 months.  I have some legal issues I'm heavily involved in that
will be taking up a lot of my time.

Thanks.

"Matt" <apartmentspecials@hotmail.com> on 01/16/2001 11:06:05 AM
To: <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Question

Chris,
??? I was going over my notes on  your search and I still need some more
information. Please call me at  832-545-0504 or 713-268-2245 some time
today.????? Matt  Haggard???
??? ???  ??? ??? ??? ???  ??? ??? ???????  Citihomes


Good morning, Steve -

Per Marla Barnard, I'm forwarding the attached spreadsheet.  Please let me
know
if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Kim

(See attached file: EBS Marketing Employees.xls)
_____________

Kim Hanson
Senior Staffing Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
http://www.enron.net
(503) 886-0422

 - EBS Marketing Employees.xls


Steve:

You might also want to take a look at the  UK Minister for Trade and
Industry's speech at the same conference- I already sent it to Mark
Schroeder.

?Regards,

Lauren

(See attached file: UK Environment speech.doc)

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
      Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Goldblatt/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Fwd:Ford chairman calls climate change world's #1 issue

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM -----

                    Cynthia
                    Sandherr            To:
                                        cc:
                    10/16/2000          Subject:
                    12:48 PM

Joe and Tom:  Either Bill Ford is a major Democrat or this signals a major
shift which serves as a strong indicator that Congress will face new
pressures next Congress to address Global Warming.  This is truly a
remarkable speech.

FORD PREDICTS END OF CAR POLLUTION
The Independent (UK)
6 October 2000

Internet:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/UK/Environment/2000-10/ford061000.shtml

The 100-year reign of the polluting internal combustion engine is coming to
an end, Bill Ford, chairman of the Ford Motor Company, said yesterday. It
will soon be replaced in motor vehicles by the hydrogen fuel cell, which
emits no pollution whatsoever and so can reduce the build-up of greenhouse
gases causing climate change, Mr. Ford, great-grandson of the company's
founder, Henry Ford, told the Greenpeace Business Conference in London.

In a remarkable speech from a motor manufacturer, in which he proclaimed
his
own environmental credentials, Mr. Ford, 43, accepted that the automobile
had
had a serious negative impact on the environment, and that his industry had
wrongly played down the threat from global warming.  And the head of the
world's second biggest car company raised eyebrows even further when he
said
that he could foresee the day when people would not want to own cars, but
merely have access to mobility.

Detroit-born Mr. Ford, who has been chairman since the start of last year,
proclaimed that climate change was the most challenging issue facing the
world and that anyone who disagreed was "in denial". Ford itself had moved
on
from that position, he said. But he felt the Kyoto protocol, the 1997 pact
in
which the industrialised nations agreed to try to limit their emission of
greenhouse gases, would not provide deep enough cuts to halt global
warming.
Only the marketplace, making new technology widely available, could tackle
the problem.

A fuel cell creates energy by an electrochemical process similar to that in
a
battery: it lets hydrogen and oxygen react together to produce electricity
and water vapour. It does not run down or need recharging, working as long
as
the hydrogen fuel is available, but most importantly, it does not produce
any
CO2, the basic by-product of any carbon-based fuel such as oil, gas or
coal.
Every major car company in the world is throwing huge sums into developing
the technology: Ford is spending $1bn (?690m) between now and 2004, while
Daimler-Chrysler, regarded as the leader in the field, has spent $700m. All
the main manufacturers have prototype fuel-cell cars running and there is a
race to bring them to market. Honda and Toyota expect to do so in 2003,
while
Ford and Daimler-Chrysler are aiming at 2004.

"I believe fuel cells will finally end the 100-year reign of the internal
combustion engine," Mr. Ford said, adding that the technology was "the holy
grail" of the motor industry. Prophesying the demise of car ownership, he
said:  "The day will come when the whole notion of car ownership is
antiquated," he said. Mr. Ford was reflecting advanced motor industry
thinking, which suggests many people might not want to pay for a car of
their
own if they could be guaranteed mobility on demand from a local hire
network.

 - UK Environment speech.doc


Thane --

We now have enough information for the wholesale deal into SDG&E.  What I
want is to mimic the legislation for R, Small C, and Street Lighting.  Can
you put together the tenor and rates so we can match?

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/06/2000
07:58 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster@ECT on 09/05/2000 11:58 AM PDT
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Price Update for SDG&E

Jeff

I found it
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000
11:59 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster on 09/05/2000 11:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price Update for SDG&E

The RFP provided for our updating prices by noon today.  Here is what I sent
out just a few minutes ago.  We don't know if they are going to disqualify us
because we are not keeping our prices open, but we are trying to stay in the
game.  (Jeff:  please forward tthis to Jim Steffes with a copy to me.  I
can't find him in the Enron Corp. e-mail.)

C


Very FUNNY!

-----Original Message-----
From: Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Lohman, TK
Subject: FW: FW: Proof that marriage exists in the animal kingdom (QUICK & FUNNY)

-----Original Message-----
From: Vaughan, Cara
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject: FW: FW: Proof that marriage exists in the animal kingdom (QUICK & FUNNY)

-----Original Message-----
From: Penny.McCarran@dynegy.com [mailto:Penny.McCarran@dynegy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Forbish, Sherry; Vaughan, Cara
Subject: FW: FW: Proof that marriage exists in the animal kingdom (QUICK & FUNNY)

-----Forwarded by Penny McCarran/HOU/Dynegy on 02/13/2002 02:45PM -----

To: Penny.McCarran@Dynegy.com, Craig.Buehler@Enron.com
From: Robert M Burleson/HOU/Dynegy
Date: 02/13/2002 12:52PM
Subject: FW: FW: Proof that marriage exists in the animal kingdom (QUICK & FUNNY)

Subject: Proof that marriage exists in the animal kingdom (QUICK & FUNNY)