Martin

How is it going?  I don't want to make this a big deal, (quite frankly you and me have better things to spend our time on, and the dollar amount relating to these cuts is trivial) but with respect to cuts in the future I think it is important that we teach the people underneath us the correct way to handle these issues, so that in the future we do not have to be involved.  Below is a quick dialog that Greg Johnston and I have had with respect to the cuts and what we can and can not do.

This seems to be blown way out of proportion by Kevin Heal and if there is anything I can do to make this GO AWAY please let me know.

Thanks,

Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnston, Greg
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Subject:	RE: ENA-ECC Force Majeure

No.  If they declare FM against us, the operative wording in the agreement is "to the extent that they are affected by such event".  In other words, they can only cut a deal to the extent the force majeure prevents them from performing.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mckay, Jonathan
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 9:29 AM
To:	Johnston, Greg
Subject:	RE: ENA-ECC Force Majeure

Greg,

Do they have any right to cut a deal by more than the amount that the pipeline declared as its force majure volume?

Jon McKay
Unemployed
phone: 403-974-6733
jonathan.mckay@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnston, Greg
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Heal, Kevin
Cc:	Mckay, Jonathan
Subject:	ENA-ECC Force Majeure

Kevin, further to your voice-mail, as indicated to you yesterday, our physical gas master agreement with ENA is in their form of Enfolio master agreement and not our form of master.  What that means is that, although the mechanics of declaring force majeure, etc. are the same, the definition of force majeure under our Enfolio master with ENA is not restricted to delivery point force majeure as it is in ECC's standard form, but is rather a broader based force majeure.  However, it must be kept in mind that, depending on the transaction, the definition of "force majeure" may be amended in the terms of the particular confirmation letter.  The application section (which is basically the same as in our form) is as follows:

This Article 5 is the sole and exclusive excuse of performance permitted under this Agreement, and all other excuses at law or in equity are waived to the extent permitted by law.  Except with regard to payment obligations, in the event either Party is rendered unable, wholly or in part, by Force Majeure to carry out its obligations hereunder, it is agreed that upon such Party's giving notice and full particulars of such Force Majeure to the other Party as soon as reasonably possible (such notice to be confirmed in writing), the obligations of the Party giving such notice, to the extent that they are affected by such event, shall be suspended from the inception and during the continuance of the Force Majeure for a period of up to 60 Days in the aggregate during any 12 Month period, but for no longer period.  The Party receiving notice of Force Majeure may immediately take such action as it deems necessary at its expense for the entire 60 Day period or any part thereof.  The Parties expressly agree that upon the expiration of the 60 Day period Force Majeure shall no longer apply to the obligations hereunder and both Buyer and Seller shall be obligated to perform...

I will send a copy of the agreement over to you which also contains the definition of Force Majeure, but again it must be remembered that such definition may be amended in the particular confirm.

Greg Johnston
Senior Counsel
Enron Canada Corp.
phone: 403-974-6745
greg.johnston@enron.com


Jaime-
I am just going by the contract which shows two banking days after receipt of
invoice.  There is no way to get a payment out today, as it takes a day or
two to work invoices through our system.  How about if I pay it the way the
contract stipulates and if there is a difference to be settled, we can net it
against our next fuel management payment?
Dan

Jaime Sanabria@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/13/2001 03:11 PM
To: Dan Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: dkeller@edisonmission.com, Rick
Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, pherrington@edisonmission.com,
Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Lng Invoice

Dan:

The price was reduced to accomodate a transfer of funds two days after
completion of discharge. The final discharge was completed on March 11th,
therefore we were expecting to see the money today. Therefore, if payment is
not until Thursday we should be increasing the price.

Dan Masters@ECT
03/13/2001 02:36 PM
To: Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Lng Invoice

Jaime-
I got it and passed it on to accounting.  You should see payment on Thursday.
Dan

Jaime Sanabria@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/13/2001 02:10 PM
To: Dan Masters@ect
cc:
Subject: Lng Invoice

Final Invoice attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/13/2001 03:17 PM ---------------------------

Jose Cruz
03/13/2001 02:24 PM
To: Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Lng Invoice

Por favor digame si hay que hacerle alg?n otro cambio.


When we move people between groups - what's the practice with regard to 1)
title and 2) salary?

Is it usual/necessary to make adjustments? It is not in the UK - but I want
to check.

B.


I neglected to suggest you might speak to  Patrice Mims-Thurston. She is the
trader on the Central Desk @ 35772.

dp


Dear Errol Mclaughlin,

Thank you for shoppping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

Below is a summary of your order :

Recipient :
September Mclaughlin at:
14025 SW FRWY
STE  505
SUGAR LAND, TX 77478

Order Summary :

Order number        :13726489.
Scheduled Date        : 02/01/01
Product               :   54.99
Service Charge        :    8.99
Tax(where applicable)  :    5.28
Total Charge          :   69.26

If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at
custservice@1800flowers.com, or call our customer service department
toll-free at 1-800-468-1141, 24 Hours a day.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Customer Satisfaction Manager
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Valentine's Day is February 14th - and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM is your One Stop
Love Shop! Order a great gift for your special someone from our Valentine's
Day collection! We have everything from the freshest roses and the best
chocolates to romantic gourmet dinners for two!

http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/psmg/4/0/0/0/0/0


8/29 - Neububer/Cappiellp notified
9/19 - Lunch time adjusted to 12:00 with Cindy to allow more time on conference call.  Deb/Dave notified.


Please print the email and attachment (click "view").  I need to learn how to
handle margins when printing.  Thanks.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/27/2000 01:44 PM -----

	"Hunt, Lawrence" <lhunt@Sidley.com>
	Sent by: "Milazzo, Michelle" <mmilazzo@Sidley.com>
	07/27/2000 12:58 PM

		 To: "'Bruce, Robert'" <robert.bruce@enron.com>, "'Shackleton, Sara'"
<sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Nissen, William J." <wnissen@Sidley.com>
		 Subject: Commodities Materials

Bob and Sara -

 As we discussed, I enclose the cover page from the lengthy CFTC
policy paper relating to regulation of Ag Options.  This paper was never
approved by the full Commission and does not represent CFTC policy.  I also
enclose:

 (i) An outline of the application for designation as a contract
market (a recent example is the application of BrokerTec Futures Exchange
LLC, published at 65 F.R. 36667 (June 9, 2000));

 (ii) Excerpts from a report by the General Accounting Office
discussing issues relating to the reauthorization of the CFTC (May 1999).
(This represents much of the seed work for S. 2679 and deals with certain of
the issues we discussed yesterday.); and

 (iii) Introductory notes to CFTC revisions to its Rules relating
to agricultural trade options (December 6, 1999).

The exemption we discussed was for an entity called SwapClear, referred to
in the GAO report.  During one of our conversations, Bob referred to
multilateral transaction execution facilities.  The Commission has proposed
regulations on this subject.  They are reported at 65 F.R. 38985 (June 22,
2000) (CCH Commodity Futures Law Reporter paragraph 28,153).

Regards.

- Larry

 <<~att341.uni>>

 - ~att341.uni

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
privileged or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.


thanks  -- given the last 2 days  - we will wait and see

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Apollo, Beth
Subject:	RE: Team building event for my direct reports

Can you hold on this until after mid-week this week?  We haven't gotten much communication from "above" on spending, but everyone is doing the obvious things to be prudent right now.  I can tell you that even over this Thanksgiving weekend (with banks open on Friday), that there is still tremendous concern and focus on cash.  (I got calls at home on Friday afternoon to provide data on EA, EGM and EIM payables - data deemed critical that day).  I know that company-wide, we will want to be certain that the cancellation of the company-wide holiday party does not result in just as much money being spent by hundreds of groups across the company.

If  waiting until after mid-week makes the timing diffcult for planning purposes, I might suggest a less costly version.  One idea is to tell your directs that you want to bring them together as a group to thank them for their hard work and offer your home for the occassion on the 7th.  You could submit for expense reimbursement the cost of something like wine and beer, and ask everyone to bring a snack to contribute to the party.  I think that everyone would understand not having the entire event underwritten by Enron - especially following the events that will occur  this week.  Over the years we have all gotten used to Enron footing the bill for so many things.  At the bank where I was before, we occassionally had get-togethers where we all brought something to the party.  It is not really unusual outside Enron.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Apollo, Beth
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Team building event for my direct reports

I have been sort of waiting to talk to you about having a small event for my direct reports to thank them for their efforts until things cooled down at the company overall, but -- I don't see that happening any time soon.

We have not really done anything at all this year, and I wanted to do an event similar to the one you had last summer for us.  They have worked so hard and we can't ever all get away from the office at the same time  -- even to have a lunch.

Was thinking about having them over to my house for drinks and then out to eat at a restraunt.  For my direct reports and spouses.  Will include both Global Services and EES.  Was thinking of Friday night after work Dec 7th.  Need to get planning if I get the go ahead.

I have a reasonably priced italian restraunt in mind, and it would be about 20 people.   Are you ok with that? And if so, would you and David want to come too?

Let me know your thoughts

Beth


Jennifer,

I hope you are doing well in the U.K., as my clock here says it is probably
about 4:52pm in London...Here is an update on BMC:

Based on the following, I would say this:

1)  BMC has worked to clear up operational problems experienced by Net Works,
and in one situation, appears to have done so successfully.
2)  Net Works has not acknowledged that the results of #1 were desired or
acceptable, and instead offered another pushback (Win2K certif'ctn), therefore
3)  BMC doesn't appear to have been given further opportunity to identify
what issues, if any, are still open at Net Works.
4)  I don't see evidence (either in these notes OR having come out from any
of the many telephone conversations I've been in) that Net Works has provided
any responses since 11/21 or so...Peter Goebel and I met w/Net Works & EBS on
11/17, and I have had no calls or e-mails responding to my requests for
information relative to "what are your top 3 problems in this BMC situation,
Net Works?" from Net Works.
5)  So, I feel confident that there are more issues (left off the table by
Net Works) than will be discussed, because
6)  Net Works doesn't want any of BMC's solutions.  Period.

7)  The Result:  EBS is on their own on their deal with BMC, as far as Net
Works' folks are concerned.

In the "I don't want any surprises" mode, I thought I'd give George a
heads-up re:  possible fallout around the BMC thing.  I told George in this
morning's staff meeting what Jim Crowder said to the EBS origination team ("I
don't see a problem here..."), and what you and I suggested EBS do - buy and
implement $1M of BMC's stuff, pay $2M for "credit", which any ENE business
unit could access, etc.  I also informed him that the EBS and BMC folks were
likely to encourage Crowder to "lean on" Philippe (which I had recommended
against).  George said he would take it up w/Jennie Rub.

If you have any questions, please let me know.
Jeff

----- Forwarded by Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 10:32 AM -----

	Stephen Morse@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	12/04/2000 10:04 AM

		 To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jennifer N Stewart/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: FW: Win2K Certification

FYI,

Pls see note below from BMC Sales folks.

Thanks,

Steve

Steve Morse
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-7137-work
713-569-7912-cell
email:  stephen_morse@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Stephen Morse/Enron Communications on 12/04/00 10:07 AM
-----

	Ann_Munson@bmc.com
	11/22/00 11:54 AM

		 To: Stephen Morse/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Chaz Vaughan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Joe_Young@bmc.com
		 Subject: FW: Win2K Certification

Here's the latest communication to Bruce Smith regarding Control-SA and
Control-M Windows 2000 certification, as well as reporting on the testing.
It's in the document, but to point it out, Control-SA is ready for
certification process on Dec of 2000 and Control-M on March 2001.

Ann M.  Munson
Senior Sales Representative
BMC Software
713-918-4569  Direct
713-918-8001  Fax
amunson@bmc.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hallberg, Rob
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:30 PM
> To: 'Bruce.Smith@enron.com'
> Cc: Munson, Ann
> Subject: Win2K Certification
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I have attached a document detailing the status of Microsoft
> Certification.  We have also summarized our Windows 2000 development and
> certification methodology which is actually a two-phase approach.  The
> most critical phase, which ensures Win2K compatibility and support and
> includes customer testing, has been completed.  The Win2K Agents are GA
> for both Control-M (scheduling) and Control-SA (security).
>
> The next phase, which is also a key element of our development strategy,
> is to insure the products meet the certification requirements for
> Microsoft Win2K.  This phase follows the Win2K initial release as MS
> Certification focuses on meeting certain Microsoft standards and not the
> application's functionality - ability to work correctly in the Control-M
> environment.
>
> Microsoft certification does not necessarily guarantee the performance of
> the application.  It is my understanding that one of the reasons Control-M
> is being considered as a replacement for sys*Admiral is due to the
> problems you are experiencing with their MS Certified release.
>
> Earlier this year we met with Philippe Bibi and reviewed BMC's Win2K
> Development Plans.  Would it be helpful to set up a similar meeting with
> an executive from our Product Marketing group to discuss these in more
> detail?
>
> One final note.  I just received the following update from Rusty Cheves,
> reconfirming that Control-M continues to run smoothly since we made the
> database changes.
>
>  Thanks Rob for all the hard work last week.  It seems as we have
> finally got this thing running smoothly.  After extending the database and
> troubleshooting which log files were filling up we now can eval till out
> hearts content.
>
>  Please tell Ronnie thanks for all his help as well
>
>  Thanks Again
>
>  Rusty
>
> As a next step, could we meet soon after the Thanksgiving Holidays?   I
> can arrange to bring an executive from product marketing along if you
> would like to discuss Win2K certification in more detail.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob
>
>
M

> Rob Hallberg
> BMC Software
> Direct: (972) 934-5073
> Mobile: (214) 695-2840
> rob_hallberg@bmc.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce.Smith@enron.com [mailto:Bruce.Smith@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:14 AM
> To: Rob_Hallberg@bmc.com; Larry.Robinson@enron.com
> Subject: RE: Recap
>
>
> Rob -
>
> Where are we with the Win2K issue ?
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Hallberg, Rob" <Rob_Hallberg@bmc.com>@ENRON
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hallberg+2C+20Rob+22+20+3CRob+5FHallberg+40bmc+2Ecom
> +3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 11:20 PM
>    To:     Robinson, Larry
>    Cc:     Sapp, Ronnie; Smith, Bruce; Cheves, Rusty
>    Subject:  RE: Recap
>
>    Hi Larry,
>
>    Following is Ronnie Sapp's summary of the problem resolution for the
>    Control-M installation problems and the reliability and scalability
>    results
>    attained.  It now appears that most of the problems were caused by the
>    setup
>    of the Oracle database.
>
>    Once we left Thursday evening and through the following day, Schedule-M
>    worked flawlessly.  The new day process was last measured taking less
>    than
>    five minutes for 960 jobs and we approximated job volumes 14,500 per
>    day.
>
>    This demonstrates the reliability and scalability of Control-M when
>    installed properly.   I will give you a call to discuss the results and
>    our
>    next steps.
>
>    Thanks,
>
>    Rob
>
>    Rob Hallberg
>    BMC Software
>    Direct: (972) 934-5073
>    Mobile: (214) 695-2840
>    rob_hallberg@bmc.com
>
>    >  -----Original Message-----
>    > From:      Sapp, Ronnie
>    > Sent:      Monday, November 20, 2000 4:16 PM
>    > To:   Rob Hallberg (E-mail)
>    > Subject:   FW: Recap
>    >
>    > Rob, will you please forward this to Larry.
>    >
>    >
>    > Larry,  Below is the recap we talked about.
>    >
>    > Recap:
>    >
>    > There were 2 outstanding issues.
>    > 1) New Day process running 2-5 hrs.
>    > 2) Jobs not running, they were all in Blue or White status.
>    >
>    > Issue number 1 was resolved the day before I arrived by Tech Support
>    > working with Rusty.  Solution was to increase the Oracle DB from 50mg
>    to
>    > 300mg.  Also the log & stat files were extremely small.  These files
>    were
>    > cleaned out by Rusty, however were never increased or set to truncate
>    in
>    > Oracle.  They will fill up again.  These files need to be set to
>    truncate
>    > by the Oracle DBA or run a set of daily utilities to clean those
>    files.
>    > We will send a draft of those utilities to be incorporated into the
>    daily
>    > schedule.
>    >
>    > Issue number 2 - According to a diagnostic report the agent machine
>    lost
>    > connection with the NIS server for a greater period of time than what
>    the
>    > default settings were set.  The agent is set to retry every 120
>    seconds up
>    > to 12 times.  After this period, manual activation is required.  I
>    signed
>    > on as CTMAGENT user and ran ag_menu.  Ran option 2 which showed the
>    NIS as
>    > down.  I then signed on as the Control-M user and ran ctm_menu.
>    Selected
>    > 7 - Agent Status,  Selected 2 - List all agent platforms unavailable.
>    > Agent on BMC was in unavailable status.  Next Selected option 3 -
>    Change
>    > agent platform to Available status.  After doing that, all the jobs
>    turned
>    > to gray status and started running.
>    >
>    > Cleaned up 2 erroneous agent names defined to Control-M/Server.
>    >
>    > I also ran a Trouble Shooting Report which produced a file
>    > (/var/home/ctlm00/report.1116001128)  from this file we could tell
>    when
>    > the Log filed filled up and when the Agent stopped.
>    >
>    > I set up 500 jobs to run daily on BMC with multiple dependencies.
> All
>    ran
>    > ok.
>    >
>    > I set up aprox. another 150 cyclic jobs with dependencies to run on
>    > OCSDEV-1.  They failed due to not using the correct Owner.  Rusty
>    knows
>    > what the correct owner should be.  I believed I used CTLM00.
>    >
>    > New Day process ran for approx. 12 mins.
>    >
>    > Right before leaving Rusty ran a clean_db script, which resulted in
>    > cleaning out the entire database.  Fortunately by design, we were
> able
>    to
>    > demonstrate the recoverability by uploading the tables from ECS to
> the
>    > Control-M Server.  In less than 5 minutes all was ok.
>    >
>    > When I left there were approx. 900 jobs running.  Of those approx.
> 400
>    > jobs were running cyclic, every 2 minutes.  Which meant on a daily
>    basis
>    > approx. 14,500 jobs ran per day.
>    >
>    > Larry, I know you asked for some type of hardware recommendations.
>    These
>    > is something that's very subjective.  As with almost any software the
>    more
>    > memory and faster CPU the better.  To do this correctly, we should
>    have
>    > our Professional Services come in and do some type of assessment of
>    your
>    > environment and the direction your heading.  How many jobs per day,
>    today,
>    > near future, etc....  How many Users of ECS?  How many Servers?
>    >
>    > In your test environment you should be able to run 2000 jobs without
> a
>    > major problem.  Your ECS NT box is on the small size, at least in the
>    > memory area.  So your responses might not be as fast as desired.
>    Please
>    > remember the out of the box default settings are not tuned to run a
>    large
>    > number of jobs.  Therefore database tuning is always recommended.
>    These
>    > tuning recommendations are provided by Professional Services.
>    >
>    > By tomorrow I will send you the daily utilities.
>    >
>    > Thanks,
>    >
>    > Ronnie Sapp
>    > bmcsoftware
>    > INCONTROL Business Unit
>    > Software Consultant Manager
>    > West Region
>    > 972-934-5065
>    > ronnie_sapp@bmc.com
>    >
>    >
>
>     - C.DTF << File: C.DTF >>


Attached please find the translated news clips from Bolivia (February 29).


Stan would like to offer out the following Astros tickets (4 tickets per
game) for the month of May, for business (first preference) or personal use,
as follows:

Monday, May 7, vs. PHI @ 7:05PM
Wednesday, May 9, vs. PHI @ 7:05PM
Friday, May 18, vs. CIN @ 7:05PM
Saturday, May 19, vs. CIN @ 1:35PM
Monday, May 21, vs. SD @ 7:05PM
Tuesday, May 22, vs. SD @ 7:05PM
Wednesday, May 23, vs. SD @ 3:05PM

Please note that game times are subject to change; please check local
listings to verify.

Cindy


Mary,

I am sending to you today via Federal Express execution copies of the GISB
between Keyspan-Ravenswood and Enron North America Corp.   Please have each
signed by an officer of your company and return same to my attention.

I will forward an original for your records upon final signature.  Please do
not hesitate to give me a call should you have any questions and or comments.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Mark -- Sorry for the rush on this.  Could you provide legal approval of this
click through demo of EnronOnline.  It's the most comprehensive discussion of
the functionality of our website.  The text you'll see will accompany various
screen shots.
The demo will be accessible through the web site.

Thanks

Kal Shah
x 39354


Thank you for your order with Kingshill. Your details have been recorded as follows:
Date: Thursday, February 07, 2002
Name: Mrs Louise Nettelton
Telephone: 07778757656
Email: louise@enron.com
Order No: 3507
*********************
Code: Y04537P
Item: SLIM SKIRT
* Pale Pink
* 18
Quantity: 1
Price: 255.00
Code: Y40354T
Item: SAND SWEATER
* Sand
* L
Quantity: 1
Price: 95.00
Code: Y99930T
Item: DRIVING SHOE
* Sand
*  8 (41)
Quantity: 1
Price: 69.00
Code: Y04536P
Item: STAND COLLAR JACKET
* Pale Pink
* 18
Quantity: 1
Price: 519.00
Code: Y40356D
Item: SCOOP NECK TUNIC
* Beige
* L
Quantity: 1
Price: 109.00
Code: Y40350B
Item: GARTER STRETCH TUNIC
* Navy
* L
Quantity: 1
Price: 155.00
*********************
Tax: 0.00
Shipping: 0.00
Total: 1,202.00
If you have any questions, please contact us.


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042519.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred: -250.00 / Final: -200.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Thank you for your phone call regarding the status of the agreement.
Attached is a redlined draft incorporating your changes and ENA's.  Upon your
review, please give me a call to discuss same.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Dave,

Effective 8/9, expected volumes were revised to the deal tickets on the
attached sheet.  The volumes were revised to those in the Avg column.  In
addition, a deal ticket was entered for Cokinos Natural Gas at meter 9842
effective 8/1 with a volume of 7,000/day.  Also, deal ticket 344928 with a
volume of 800/day was changed from Trade Zone(s) 1 to 18.

Bob


Will do.

	Lisa Yoho
	12/21/2000 09:31 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: California Utilities - Bankruptcy Risk

Jeff -- Please keep George McClellan, Kevin McGowan and Stuart Staley
informed of regulatory developments in California.    Thanks, and call me if
you have any questions.

Lisa
----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000 07:29 AM -----

	George McClellan@ECT
	12/18/2000 02:40 PM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: California Utilities - Bankruptcy Risk

Lisa - I would like to be kept informed on the regulatory environment in
California - especially with regard to bankruptcy risk for Mission, Sempra
and PGE.  We have significant credit exposure to each company.  Are we
following developments in this area?


Need to know if what they say is true on there protest to invoice.  Do we
only have an interruptible contract with them.


Kaye:  Would you please reschedule my lunch with Carol to sometime next week
(not Tuesday or Wednesday).  Thanks.  Sara


I approve of Craig.  It was great to meet him.  Had a very restful and fun
time in Tulsa but glad to be back in Houston.  will call you later in week.


Brent and Sally,

After speaking with Richard Burchfield and Brian Hudson, I thought that it
would be appropriate to update both of you and Beth as to IT's commitment.
Richard asked that he send out the message and I agreed.  One reason for
doing this was to show that the Operations and IT groups are working together
towards a common goal.  The other reason was to ensure that I had IT's buy-in
to completing this database in a timely fashion.

Our main goal will be to deliver the basic tools that any trading business
would need and then to continue to develop the more advanced analytics in Q1
2001.  The actual roll out will happen in phases prior to January so that we
begin the new year with a complete database which includes deal capture,
valuation, and the necessary reporting and accounting tools.  By using Brian
Hudson's IT team I can be assured that the global needs are met.

I will be in the office next week if you want to discuss this further,

Todd

------------------- Forwarded by D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000 03:22 PM
---------------------------

Richard Burchfield
09/12/2000 06:20 PM
To: D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hudson/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Weather

Todd,
 Per our discussion on moving forward with the development of a Weather
Trading and Valuation engine.  I have discussed the high level requirements
with Joseph Koothrappaly and have identified an IT lead to manage the
project. As discussed, the project will have the same project formula as the
"Thunderball" project with 3-6 month deliverables. Also, the need to have
co-operative development between Houston and London will be established for
Global roll out of the Weather system. The main focus will be a intranet
trade capture and position with a callable valuation engine. The plan calls
for Phase I roll out for January 1, 2001.   Next steps will need to be
discuss as soon as possible.  Topics that need to be addressed are definition
of Phase I, joint development between Houston and London, and duel
development between Steve Stock's valuation team and my trading team. Keep in
mind that though multiple teams will have development assignments, one person
will manage the effort across teams.

Richard


As you are aware, there have recently been a number of virus attacks released and spread across the Internet. Although Enron continually readdresses and updates its virus protection procedures, new viruses will continue to be released and pose a threat to Enron's computing environment. Therefore, it is very important that all Enron employees understand their responsibilities in helping Enron stay virus free.
If you receive a file via Email or any other means and you are unfamiliar with the sender or the purpose of the file, please do not automatically open/launch the file. One of the key elements of a virus attack is the innocent nature of its delivery.
Viruses can cause a significant amount of damage, including data loss and service outage. Viruses such as the Melissa, ILOVEYOU, AnnaKournikova, and the recent Nimda virus, caused organizations billions of dollars. Sometimes new viruses can breach the environment before the virus scanning software has been updated to detect & quarantine them.
Every employee in the Enron organization has a responsibility to keep our computing environment virus-free.
If you believe you have a file that looks suspicious, delete it or contact your Resolution Center to obtain their assistance.
North America Resolution Center - x31411
ETS Solution Center - x54745
European Resolution Center - x36777
EES Help Desk - x 39797
Prevention & Detection = PROTECTION!


djunek@aeglobalmarkets.com

I chat with him via aol instant messenger.  His id there is djunek13.

He's not in the office today.

your msn doesn't work.


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 80335 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 02:50 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/24/2001 04:55 PM

		 To: pamela.coleman@gs.com
		 cc: nikki.kroll@gs.com, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Pamela:

Please call or email regarding the account assignment.  If you are not the
right person, please forward the request and advise.  We are anxious to have
this executed.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/24/2001 04:52 PM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/22/2001 10:31 AM

		 To: pamela.coleman@gs.com
		 cc: nikki.kroll@gs.com
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Pamela:

I am also sending you the attached message which I just sent to Nikki Kroll.
Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 10:30 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	05/22/2001 10:27 AM

		 To: nikki.kroll@gs.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA")
accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Nikki:

I am a lawyer with ENA.  I understand that you have been involved with the
execution of the Goldman Sachs & Co. ("GSC")/ECI Corporate Account Agreement,
working with both Cheryl Nelson and Stephanie Panus of ENA.

ENA would like to transfer several accounts to ECI.  In connection therewith,
I am attaching a form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement for that
purpose.  This document is based upon a similar agreement executed by GSC,
ENA and ECT Investments, Inc. on January 22, 2001.

I ask that you please advise me of the following:

(1)  What is the effective date of the Corporate Account Agreement between
ECI and GSC?  Has it been executed by GSC?

(2)  Is the attached form of assignment acceptable?

(3)  Is there anybody else with GSC that needs to be involved with the
review/execution of the attached assignment?

Please let me hear from you.  Our commercial group is extremely anxious to
effectuate the transfer.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Not interested.


FYI

Today's FERC meeting was a big deal.   Some of the key actions are:

DSTAR and RTO West are to be "married,"  The FERC wants a single western RTO but will wait on making CAISO merge with other western RTOs so that California can "heal its wounds."
Every utility needs to declare which RTO it plans to join by 12/1/01 (or possibly 12/15; not sure of date).  Otherwise the utility will lose market-based rates, will be unable to get a merger approved, and will have its transmission rev req. scrutinized.
The commission favors 1 market structure applied to the four nationwide RTOs.   It plans on holding a week of workshops and issuing a NOPR to determine this structure.  The goal is to essentially re-issue the Order 888 tariff in a form that encompases the new functions of RTOs.  Although consistent business rules applied to large geographic markets are a good thing, expect this new effort and redefining the RTO to delay ultimate implementation.
Although California will be allowed to heal, it is ordering an operational audit of the Calfornia ISO.
Separately the FERC indicated the plan to issue a NOPR on market power and market based rates.   Expect new rules and procedure to determine whether a market is sufficiently competitive to allow for market based rates.

Further summary, prepared by Sarah Novosel in our Govt. Affairs DC office, is provided bel  o   w

The Commission held its first open meeting with Pat Wood as the new Chairman today and discussed many interesting issues.  The following is a summary of the meeting.  The meeting is still going on, and we will provide an addendum to this email updating you on what was discussed this afternoon (regarding market power).

RTOs

Chairman Wood expressed his desire to finish the RTO transition, and that the Commission needs to provide guidance and leadership in order to speed up the RTO transition.  Chairman Wood considers the RTO effort on two tracks:  1) organizational -- what will the RTO organizations look like, and 2) substantive -- once you set up the organizations, what will they do.

Organizational Effort:  Wood stated that this effort has already begun with the July 12 orders and the Northeast and Southeast mediation efforts.  The Commission will be issuing additional orders in the northeast, southeast and Midwest within the next couple of FERC meetings.  Wood also stated that it is time for RTO West and Desert Star to "marry up," meaning, I suppose, that the two should consolidate.  Wood does not think that California can be included in the western RTO yet since it has lingering problems.

Structural Effort:  The Commission will initiate a section 206 proceeding to address market design and structure issues in order to translate the 8 functions established in Order No. 2000 into RTO structures.  To achieve this goal, the Commission is establishing an "RTO week" of advanced workshops, from October 15-19, in advance of issuing a NOPR, to address structural issues such as:  congestion management; cost recovery; market monitoring; transmission planning; reliability; transmission rights.  Wood also envisions that the Commission will develop a new pro forma tariff to replace the existing Order No. 888 transmission tariff.  The new tariff will apply to all public utilities and RTOs.

Wood also recognized that some "sticks" are needed to entice RTO participation.  Therefore, Wood proposes to have all public utilities come in by December 15, 2001 with a declaration to join an RTO.  If they do not make this declaration, these entities will have their market based rate authority revoked on a prospective basis.  Furthermore, Wood states that if entities do not join RTOs, they should not be authorized to merge their facilities, and that FERC will also look at their rates to determine whether they are still just and reasonable rates compared with rates offered by RTOs.  Wood states that these "sticks" provide incentive, but do not mandate, RTO participation.

With regard to the pending requests for rehearing, Wood asked legal staff to figure out how "FERC can get there."  In other words, I think Wood is telling them to develop the legal analysis for denying rehearing.

While Commissioner Breathitt is skeptical about some of these RTO proposals, because she was not required to vote on anything today, she only expressed her concern.

Upcoming Dates

	October 15-19 --	RTO Workshops
	End of October -- further orders on Northeast, Southeast, Midwest RTOs
	December 15, 2001 -- all public utilities must commit to an RTO or have their market based rates revoked

Proposed Rule for Standards of Conduct

Within the next few days, FERC will be issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ("NOPR") on standards of conduct for transmission providers.  As explained at the meeting (we do not have a copy of the NOPR yet), the NOPR will propose to apply standards of conduct uniformly to electric transmission providers and gas pipeline transportation providers similarly.  The NOPR also proposes to broaden the definition of affiliate to include all energy affiliates, not just marketers.  The standards of conduct would not apply to RTOs and transmission providers who are members of an RTO may ask for an exemption from the standards.

The NOPR will also likely include a proposal that the standards apply to transmission-owners' marketing affiliates that are serving native load customers.  As you know, the present standards do not apply to the affiliates of TOs that are only buying and selling power for native load customers.  As the interim general counsel noted, these marketing affiliates can go into the control room and have unrestricted interaction with the TO.

There was some discussion of whether it is necessary to apply the standards to affiliates serving native load.  Staff told the Commissioners that market participants have been complaining for years about this loop hole in the rules.  Pat Wood said they will include the proposal in the NOPR (Breathitt may not support), but if the industry does not support the proposal, FERC will pull it.  We of course will strongly support the proposal.

Provision of Adequate Electrical Capacity (ICAP)

Chairman Wood asked Staff to prepare a presentation on reserves and installed capacity requirements.  Wood noted that the Commission had to issue an order on ICAP in New England during their recess in August, and he is not that familiar with the issues.  Therefore, he asked Staff to prepare a presentation, which they made at the meeting this morning.  The presentation will be made public within the next couple of days.  In sum, Staff seems to believe that some type of ICAP requirement is needed for reliability.

After the presentation, Wood noted that the New England ICAP order has enough wiggle room to allow the Commission to change its mind once the commissioners better understand the issue.  Wood sees that there is a potential conflict between decentralized, competitive markets and the need for sufficient supply (without politically unacceptable, prolonged price spikes).

Commissioner Brownell (from the Pennsylvania PUC) has a better understanding of  ICAP and expressed concerns that ICAP may be an outdated tool that acts as a barrier to entry without any definable benefit to customers.

Realizing that there are many positions on this topic, Chairman Wood said he will publish the Staff report and ask for comments by October 17.  We will definitely submit comments on this and will include everyone in the drafting process.

Sorry this is so long, but a lot happened today.  We will provide a summary of the market power discussion as soon as it is over.  Let us know if you have any questions.

Sarah


Brief from today's (October 19) daily NERC Security Call:

SC's      -No new information

NIPC      - Cyber Notes: There's a new hacking tool out to exploit a bug,
          it's called Secure Shell. System operators have gotten remote
          scans attempting to run shells. There is rumor of a new Microsoft
          worm set to run November 11 called "Redesi Worm"

DOE       - Continue at SECON level 3 modified.  Note:  SECON-3 is used
          when an increased and more predictable threat of terrorist
          activity exists and may increase access controls to include
          additional personnel and vehicle barriers.

NERC           -Continue in Alert level 2.5, something between full alert
status and heightened alert.

ECAR/MET Security Coordinator suggests that ECAR members continue to
evaluate their security measures and take action that they deem appropriate
to protect the system and their investment.  ECAR/MET reminds the ECAR
members that if Federal Agencies discover that one of your facilities is
the target of a credible threat, that they will notify you directly of such
threat.  You are asked to notify the ECAR/MET Security Coordinator of any
and all suspicious activities that occur on or near critical transmission
facilities and power plants, as well as the appropriate law enforcement
authorities.

This information is for dissemination within the industry only.  Please do
not make available to any public posting.

Daniel R. Boezio
ECAR/MET Security Coordination
Manager Transmission Security
Phone:  614-413-6630
e-mail: drboezio@aep.com


Hi guys,

I've gone back and looked at the AIP.


Steve:  It's ok to put confirmed.  Mark

	SKramer@milbank.com
	09/25/2000 03:03 PM

		 To: Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Energy Bar Association Program

Mark,
I appreciate your taking the time out of your busy schedule to participate in
the program.  I will plan to arrange a conference call during the early part
of October among the e-commerce panelists.  Can the program reflect that you
are confirmed, or should we list you as invited?
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From:   Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com [SMTP:Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com]
Sent:   Monday, September 25, 2000 3:57 PM
To:     SKramer@milbank.com
Subject:        Re: Energy Bar Association Program

Steve:
It looks like a great program!  I am happy to participate.  I would like to
have a teleconference of the panel within a few weeks so that I can make
sure I have time to get my materials together.
Regards,
Mark

SKramer@milba

                    nk.com               To:
mark.e.haedicke@enron.com

cc:
                    09/20/2000           Subject:     Energy Bar Association
Program
                    04:14
PM

Mark,
Per my telephone conversation with Margaret Gerhardt, I want to thank you
very much for your interest in participating on the e-commerce panel for
the Energy Bar Association mid-year program.;  Margaret suggested that you
be listed on the program brochure as "invited," in case a conflict should
arise. The Association will be distributing a final brochure at a later
date which will reflect any changes in speakers.;  Attached for your
information is a draft program brochure and a brief overview of the
e-commerce panel.;  The Association believes that the e-commerce panel is
timely given the dramatic impact that electronic commerce is having on the
economy generally, and in particular due to the unprecedented changes
taking place in the energy industries.;  Having the perspective of
EnronOnline, the industry leader, will be a great addition to the program.
Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information.;  I
look forward to seeing you at the program.
Steve
Steven M. Kramer
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
International Square Building
1825 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
TEL:;  202-835-7508
FAX:;  202-835-7586
skramer@milbank.com
 <<EBA-MidYear2000-Agenda-Draft-9-12-00.doc>>  <<EBA Mid-Year Meeting.doc>>
This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

(See attached file: EBA-MidYear2000-Agenda-Draft-9-12-00.doc)
(See attached file: EBA Mid-Year Meeting.doc)
 << File: EBA-MidYear2000-Agenda-Draft-9-12-00.doc >>  << File: EBA Mid-Year
Meeting.doc >>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Let me know if this is not what you need.


NICE! EAT WELL! SLEEP SOUND!

ps be aware of hidden hotel costs for internet  - christian in san antonio
worked on the internet  for several hours only to be billed $3000 for long
distance telephone time.

	Grant Cox <gacox@mail.gsi-net.com>
	06/11/2001 10:44 AM

		 To: Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: you've got mail

i've joined the 21st century and can send mail from my hotel room.

I'm at 2147202020 room 807.  the fairmont!  Or you can email me at my
regular address.

xxoo

---------------------------------------------------------------
 Grant A. Cox                          ph: (713) 522-6300
 Groundwater Services, Inc.           fax: (713) 522-8010
 2211 Norfolk, Suite 1000          e-mail: gacox@gsi-net.com
 Houston, TX 77098
---------------------------------------------------------------


I'm interested!

Kate

Mollie Gustafson
05/01/2001 12:14 PM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: TONIGHT - BEAVERS BASEBALL

I have 3 tickets available for the Beavers game tonight, these are in the
Enron Pavilion Suite, game starts at 6:30 PM.
I also have a parking pass available.

First person to express interest is the winner!

Thanks.

Mollie


Frank,
Attached is my PBA nomination for Anne Bike.  Let me know if I left anything
out, or need to do anything else.  Thanks,
DG


Attached is a special summary of all the recent RTO compliance filings
submitted October 16.

FERC has a sizable task facing them to review these filings.


Dear Vince,

Thank you for your prompt response.  I do realize
that the A&A Program has finished accepting
candidates for this summer; I was inquiring about
the possibility of hiring on an individual basis.

Again, I greatly appreciate your time.  I look
forward to seeing you soon!

Regards,
Van


This spreadsheet corrects the graph in the previously submitted spreadsheet,
removing the last two data points.
Data is only through June 2000, and the graph incorrectly also showed the
average numbers as if they were numbers for July and August 2000.

---------------------- Forwarded by Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000 04:47
PM ---------------------------

Arvel Martin
07/25/2000 03:43 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan M Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crescendo Pressure Data

The attached is a monthy table w/ a summary of line pressures and production.
Take a look and see if this is what you need.
Notice the sheet called "Summary by month and average", especially the last
few columns with averages calculated.

Remember, most of the Entrada Production went off-line beginning in 1998,
with final production in August 99.
Call me @ 3-1888 if we need to discuss.
Arvel


Enclosed are the comments of WGSI on the Proposed Decision in this
proceeding.  Please contact Michael Day if you have any comments, questions,
or difficulty opening this email.  415-392-7900

Mike Day

 <<X19039.DOC>>

 - X19039.DOC


Looks ok to me.

GISB4@aol.com on 05/15/2001 11:17:46 AM
To: Gisb@aol.com, GISB1@aol.com
cc: Jrtemplton@aol.com, wboswell@mcguirewoods.com, shorton@enron.com,
hdroberts@marathonoil.com, jcostan@mcguirewoods.com, jgomez@enron.com,
jhb@8760.com, novakm@natfuel.com

Subject: Draft GISB Review for Publication

To the Editorial Review Board,

Attached is the draft for the next issue of the GISB Review.  Please let me
know your comments, corrections or additions by close of business May 18 so
that we can send it to the printers for publication.

Thank you for all of your help.

Jo Ann Garcia
gisb4@aol.com

If you have difficulty retrieving this document, please call the GISB office
at (713) 356-0060.

(The GISB organization follows a privacy policy, which does not permit
distribution of contact information. If you are on a GISB distribution list
and would like to be removed, please email such request to the GISB office
and your email address will be removed. If you would like to add other
participants from your company to this distribution list, please also email
such request to the GISB office.)

 - spring01.wd.doc


Cool!
Cameron

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com>
To: cameron@perfect.com <cameron@perfect.com>
Sent: Thu Oct 25 14:26:46 2001
Subject: meeting with enron

It's going to be sometime in the afternoon on the 13th.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Hi Heather,

Hope you got situated in your new, swanky spot.  Can't wait to see what
you've done with it.

I'm attaching Paige's resume, since she is interested in a summer
internship.  Any help you can give in directing it to the right person would
be appreciated.

Thanks,

Kay


Here is the file.
PL


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by James Derrick/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000
05:03 PM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 11/21/2000 02:39 PM
To: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Enron, Powerex Investigated for Alberta Price Fixing

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 11/21/2000 02:35 PM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	11/21/2000 02:34 PM

		 To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

=DJ Enron, Powerex Investigated For Alberta Price Fixing
11/21/0 15:31 (New York)

      By Cheryl Devoe Kim
      Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

  TORONTO (Dow Jones)--Canada's Competition Bureau raided the offices of Enron
Canada Corp. in Calgary and Powerex Corp. in Vancouver earlier this year as
part of an investigation into suspected electricity price fixing by the two
companies, according to documents obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
  Bureau investigator David Bloom alleges in an application for a warrant he
used to gain access to the offices that in the summer of 1999, Powerex and
Enron were coordinating bid restatements and inflating the price each received
for electricity as they traded on the Power Pool of Alberta.
  The investigation hasn't yet produced any charges against either of the
companies, according to Enron. The Competition Bureau declined to comment on
the status of the case.
  Both Enron Corp. (ENE), which owns Enron Canada, and Powerex, a unit of
provincially owned British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority (X.BCH), deny
breaking any rules or laws.
  From Powerex's point of view, Albertans are looking for someone to blame for
high power prices, which have become a political issue in the province.
  "They just find it easy to blame us for what are pretty fundamental market
design flaws," Powerex president and chief executive Ken Peterson told Dow
Jones Newswires in an interview.
   Deregulation Spurs Search For Someone To Blame
  The search for someone to blame has repeated itself across every
deregulating
market Enron has participated in, Enron Corp. spokesman Mark Palmer said.
  "Almost every time that either power markets or natural gas markets or even
oil markets or gasoline markets have experienced any kind of price volatility,
there have been investigations done," Palmer said.
  Enron has been scrutinized before as part of wider energy markets
investigations, he said, but never found to be breaking the rules. This is the
first such investigation into Powerex's actions, Peterson said.
  The Competition Bureau, based in Ottawa, won't say whether the investigaion
is ongoing, citing disclosure rules under the Competition Act.
  The companies themselves said they're not sure of the investigation's
status.
Their seized files were returned several months ago, but Powerex hasn't heard
from the Bureau since then. Enron did receive a call from the Bureau last week
with a question, according to Enron Corp. spokesman Eric Thode.
  The investigation began when the Power Pool of Alberta's system controllers
noticed the clearing price for a megawatt of electricity was topping C$100
with
unusual frequency.
  The Pool's price is set by participants submitting bids to buy or sell power
for the following day. Until Oct. 19, 1999, a bidder could restate the amount
of power in a bid or offer an unlimited number of times, until 20 minutes
before the hour of transmission. The price paid for every megawatt of power
needed by the Pool in a given hour is set by the most expensive unit needed to
meet demand.
   Alleged Bid Rigging Methods Detailed
  According to the Competition Bureau search warrant application, Powerex and
Enron were rigging their bids in the following manner:
  Powerex would lower the volume of an existing offer. As little as two
minutes
later, Enron would increase its offer for the same period by the same volume,
but at a "significantly higher price," according to the warrant application.
Sometimes, Enron would increase its offer even before Powerex had dropped its
offer.
  Power Pool market analyst Owen Craig, who once worked in Enron Canada's gas
trading group, found that "as a result of restatements, involving mostly
Powerex and Enron," the Pool price was raised once to C$200/MWh, four times to
between C$354.29 and C$499.93, three times to between C$500 and C$541.63, and
10 times to between C$801.02 and C$998.
  Based on the restatement patterns, Craig, and then the Bureau's Bloom,
concluded that no new energy was being offered to the Pool. They believed the
power was just being transferred from Powerex to Enron and then offered at the
higher price, according to the warrant application. By cutting the volume
offered by Powerex, the more expensive power offered by Enron would likely be
needed, and every participant would get the higher price.
  Powerex's Peterson doesn't take issue with the trade history as detailed by
the Bureau, but denies that the company's traders were doing anything wrong or
that the two companies had some sort of arrangement.
  "And we're adamant about that," Peterson said. "There was no deal with
Enron.
There was no expectation about what their behavior would lead to in terms of a
change in prices or anything like that."
  Powerex traders were merely locking in their price, cutting the company's
risk, which Enron agreed to take on by buying the power at a fixed price,
Peterson said.
  "Whenever Enron's offer of high-priced energy was declined, within moments
of
Enron being advised by the Pool that their energy would not be required,
Powerex would restate an identical volume of energy back into its lower priced
unit," according to the warrant application.
  Peterson's response: "We're operating in a very tight market there and we
felt an obligation to make sure the power got delivered into Alberta."
  Enron also denies it broke any Power Pool rules or Canadian laws.
  "It boils down to we were offered power at a price lower than we thought we
could sell it at," Enron's Thode said. "And that's what Enron and every other
company does that's in the business of trading."
  The May 25 search warrant covers the companies' actions between June 1,
1999,
and Oct. 19, 1999. On Oct. 20, 1999, the Pool changed its restatement rules,
essentially closing the loophole, though it did so without ever making public
its investigation into Powerex and Enron.
  Power Pool spokesman Wayne St. Amour declined to discuss details of the
investigation.
  "Market surveillance is in place to, among other things, protect the
interests and activities of market participants," he said.
  Those convicted under Canadian law for bid-rigging can be fined an amount at
the court's discretion and/or jailed up to five years. A conviction wouldn't
likely affect Powerex's ability to trade in the U.S., Peterson said. In Canada
"there would have to have some follow-on action by the Alberta parties to
inhibit that. And so far, they still like to get our power."
  Companies Concerned About Reputations
  The bigger problem, Peterson said, is what the case will do to the Powerex
reputation.
  "Essentially both companies are concerned about it because we have a lot at
stake from a reputational point of view," Peterson said. "Both companies, I
believe, conduct themselves in the highest possible standard. But these are
difficult times in the business with prices going crazy in Alberta and
California and people looking for somebody to blame. There's always a
possibility of collateral damage when politics gets involved."
  Powerex parent company BC Hydro is also suspected by the Power Pool of
Alberta of unfairly providing access to transmission through British Columbia,
linking Washington with Alberta, as detailed in an Oct. 13 Power Pool market
surveillance report. Again, no charges have been laid.

  Company Web sites: http://www.powerex.com, http://www.enron.com

  -By Cheryl Kim, Dow Jones Newswires; 416-306-2017; cheryl.kim@dowjones.com

  (END) DOW JONES NEWS  11-21-00
  03:31 PM- - 03 31 PM EST 11-21-00


HOTEL DISCOUNTS TRAVEL NEWSLETTER
[IMAGE]

May 3, 2001

This Week's Features
 Hot Hotel Specials
 City On Sale
 Condos and Vacation Rentals
 Free Cheesecake
 Rebate Up To $100!
 Earn Commission!
 Advertisers

FEATURE DEAL OF THE WEEK

?

Orlando's Clarion Maingate

- Located 2 miles from Disney World
- Rates from $59.95!
- Sun-Thurs, 5/05/01-5/31/01
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] &nbsp?[IMAGE]

?    HOTEL SPECIALS
?

TOP DESTINATIONS - CLICK ON A CITY FOR LIST OF HOTELS AND AVAILABILITY

[IMAGE]
Las Vegas  - as low as $39.95
[IMAGE]
San Francisco - as low as $65.95
[IMAGE]
Washington D.C.  - as low as $69.95
[IMAGE]
Miami - as low as $49.95
[IMAGE]
New York  - as low as $79.95
[IMAGE]
New Orleans - as low as $69.95
[IMAGE]
Chicago   - as low as $65.95
[IMAGE]
Boston - as low as $65.95
[IMAGE]
Orlando  - as low as $39.95
[IMAGE]
Los Angeles - as low as $55.95
[IMAGE]
Reno  - as low as $29.95
[IMAGE]
London - as low as $79.95
[IMAGE]
Paris   - as low as $59.95
[IMAGE]
Rome - as low as $105.95

Rates may vary depending on dates  of travel

 SELECT YOUR DESTINATION BELOW
FOR MORE  GREAT HOTEL BARGAINS

UNITED STATES

Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virgina
Washington
Wyoming

INTERNATIONAL

 Asia
Europe
Canada
Caribbean
United Kingdom

?   CITY ON SALE
Chicago is on Sale With Rates As Low As $99.95 with its City-Of-The-Week
Promotion. Travelers will find additional discounts to HRN's already reduced
rates in Chicago. For the list of Chicago Hotel Specials and availability,
click here

?   CONDOS AND VACATION RENTALS
?

TOP DESTINATIONS

[IMAGE]
Las Vegas  - as low as $35.95

[IMAGE]
Hawaii  - as low as $69.95

[IMAGE]
Miami  - as low as $89.95

[IMAGE]
Orlando  - as low as $79.95

[IMAGE]
Mountain Resorts  - as low as $65.95

For More Great Condo and Vacation Rental Specials in Other Destinations,
click here.

Rates may vary depending on dates  of travel

?  FREE CHEESECAKE
Book 3 Nights or more in New York and receive a Free New York Style
Cheesecake.
For details,  click here

?    REBATE UP TO $100
Book 3 nights or more and get up to $100 cashback. For further details, click
here

?    EARN COMMISSION! PARTNER WITH HRN!
If you have a website and are interested in earning big commissions (some
earn more than $60,000 per month) and becoming an affiliate of Hotel
Reservations Network, click here

?    ADVERTISE WITH HRN
 Advertising is available on it's two websites, hoteldiscounts.com and
180096hotel.com!  HRN will also take bids for what is the most targeted
position of all on the bottom of every hotel confirmation email as
reservation has been made.  Please contact Michael Stover at
mstover@hoteldiscounts.com

THIS WEEK'S ADVERTISERS

BESTFARES.COM -
Bestfares.com has over 200 U.S. city pairs on sale for $162 roundtrip or less
through September 10, 2001. Whether you seek a coast-to-coast bargain or a
shorter haul trip, this is a week for savings. Many fares are under $100 and
some, as low as $65. Check out all of the specials  -  click here  -

CHEAPCARRENTAL.COM -
When you rent a car, how do you know you've gotten the best rate? You now can
know for sure! Compare prices in one place of top car rental companies
worldwide and select and confirm the lowest rate! E-mailed confirmation
number guarantees the cheapest rate!  -  click here  -

OFFICES2SHARE.COM -
Offices2share.com (http://www.offices2share.com) is a nationwide listing
service that brings together those companies that have short-term office
space with businesses and individuals seeking short-term, ready-to-move-into
offices. -  click here  -

iDINE.COM -
iDine Prime (formerly Transmedia/Dining a la Card)
Enjoy 20% on meals at more than 6,500 restaurants nationwide! You will never
need a discount card or coupons. Join iDine Prime now for only $49/yr.

To visit iDine -  click here  -

CITYSEARCH.COM -
For happenings and activities in Orlando - click here -

?  SUBSCRIBE AND UNSUBSCRIBE
 To Subscribe to the Hot Deals Travel Newsletter, send a message to
join-hotdeals@mail.hotelresnetwork.com  If you want to unsubscribe please see
the footer at the bottom of this page.

---
You are currently subscribed to specials1 as: pkeavey@ECT.ENRON.COM
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-specials1-1240808H@mail.hotelresnetwork.com


Per my conv. w/Sandy Steffen w/the referenced counterparty (ph:
734/887--2048, fax: 734/887-2056):
POWER:  It appears they would like to trade many of the East Coast power
contracts.  She isn't sure whether the Purchase and Sale Agreement they have
in place with us would cover East Coast power, and whether it would cover
firm and non-firm power.  Also, she was wondering whether we trade power
transmission (I had no idea, silly me).  Further, even if we have a master in
place with them, I don't know whether we would want to transact under it or
under a GTC.  My records show they have come thru before through EOL and
Legal shut down for power (Credit has them open).
EMISSIONS:  They would also like to transact SO2, and want to get a master in
place with  us.  I told her I would have one of the emissions lawyers talk to
her (they are already open w/Legal & Credit to trade emissions).
MASTER USER CHANGE:  She already has a password set up with us and would like
to change the master user.


Your thoughts?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 08:06
AM ---------------------------

Brett R Wiggs
12/04/2000 07:36 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

FYI.  A couple of comments on the GE contract.

Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 12/04/2000
10:37 PM ---------------------------

John Guidry
12/02/2000 03:36 PM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron, Roderick Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Glauco
Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Mucci/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

Brett,

Just a few comments.  Exhibit H-2 Training and Exhibit B-2 Specifications
need to be added.  Exhibit N-1 does not have the unit price.  The Contract
Terms do not have the contract price.

John

Brett R Wiggs
01/01/2001 09:49 AM
To: John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron, John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron, Roderick
Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Glauco Palhoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Mucci/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

I failed to forward this to you guys yesterday.  Please work to come up with
consolidated comments as soon as possible.  Same comment on major problems as
opposed to small comments.

Thanks,
Brett
---------------------- Forwarded by Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron on 01/01/2001
12:48 PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/29/2000 03:18 PM
To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

The first of these two documents contains the key terms of the GE contract
for the ESA deal.  It was prepared by GE.  Your comments would be appreciated.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/29/2000 12:14
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 11/29/2000 07:10:18 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: ESA Electrobolt Exhibits

 <<ESA_Electrobolt_Summary of Contract Terms-112800.doc>>

 <<ESA_Electrobolt_Exhibits.DOC>>

Here's what I think we should have on the ESA exhibits.  Let's see if it
will hunt.

Thanks,
Lee


Jennifer,

I cannot attend.

Vince

Jennifer Burns
02/06/2001 02:02 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adam Gross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill White/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gloria
Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REMINDER - Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a Trader's Roundtable meeting today at 4:00PM in EB3321.
Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thanks!
Jennifer
3-9440


can't make it


Clem:  Would you please contact  Susan Hopkinson about the guaranty.  She
works in Paris and her phone number is 33 1 53 67 4747.  Thanks.  Sara

ps  I have separtely emailed to you the blacklined guaranty.
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 10:58 AM -----

	"Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com>
	11/14/2000 10:32 AM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>, <Stephanie.Panus@enron.com>
		 cc: "Sharon Lewis" <sharon.lewis@lovells.com>
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of SITA

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Sara
?
Thank you for your email.? Our comments are as  follows:
?
1. Thank you.
?
2. We do not understand the difficulty in accepting our Rider  A which is a
standard provision in a guarantee and one which our client strongly  wishes
to include. Please would you therefore schedule a conference call with  your
corporate lawyer Clement Abrams to discuss this.? Please note that  Susan is
out of the office on Thursday.
?
3.? We agree to 10 Business Days.
?
4. We agree to there being no replacement credit  support.
?
We look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards
Sharon Lewis and Susan Hopkinson

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 11/14/2000 16:06:44  >>>
Sharon & Susan:? We will send blackline shortly.?  With respect to your fax
of 11/10/00, please note the  following:

1.? continuing guaranty is fine
2.? Rider A will  require further discussion and is not acceptable
3.? 30 days is too long  and not justifiable but we are agreeable to extend
time to? 10 Business  Days
4.? Replacement credit support is not acceptable

If yous till wish to pursue unacceptable items, please advise and I will
try  to? arrange a call for you and the Enron Corp. lawyer, Clement  Abrams,
who is currently out of town.? He returns  tomorrow.

Thanks.? Sara

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	 	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]

Click to learn more...

 	[IMAGE]	DARK  ORBIT  	Oct  11, 2001	[IMAGE]
				[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]			  Our new space shooter delivers the best 3D action you'll find on the Web  -- or just about anywhere else. Take the online version for a test drive,  and then download the entire game to your hard drive. You'll be blown away!
[IMAGE]
 ATOMFILMS  HITS  [IMAGE] Sweet  Release   Break  Stuff   Greedy  #4  [IMAGE] SHOCKWAVE.COM GAMES [IMAGE] Blix   InkLink   Tamale  Loco: Rumble    [IMAGE]   				   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     WATERBALLOON  DROP 5  Slick new graphics and a  precarious setting atop the Golden Gate Bridge have made this updated  classic one of the most popular games at Shockwave.com.     [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]     GEARS You're the  ghost in the machine in our new puzzle game -- but only if you can  get all the wheels turning in the right direction.     [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]       THE  GREEDY SHOW  Toilet humor reigns as Jim  Belushi and friends unleash their new animated comedy series on our  partner site, AtomFilms.     [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]     PHOTOJAM  Download PhotoJam, put YOUR  digital photos to music, and share 'em with friends and family around  the Web! It's the killer app for great Halloween and holiday moments.     [IMAGE]  Unsubscribe Instructions: To unsubscribe from the Shockwave.com newsletter, click here .

[IMAGE]


To Friends and Neighbors,

Bernice Dansby called me last night to point out a
correction/clarification of the information in the EMCA newsletter that
we provided on the upcoming primary elections.  First, the early voting
on February 23rd will be held at the Multi-Purpose Center on West Gray,
just west of Waugh.  The regular Democratic voting location will be at
Wharton Elementary School on March 12, however, she has not heard where
the Republican primary will be held.  She told me that sometimes they
are held in separate rooms at the school, but sometimes are in different
locations.  So please watch the newspaper for voting locations to ensure
that you go to the correct location for your Party's primary.

Cheryl Hastings

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


AMEREX

Diana Scholtes
563461 - should be amerex/in as prebon/changed

Chris Mallory
563362 - he changed it to Prebon

PREBON

Chris Mallory
563461 - changed to amerex
563358 - killed/new heavy load deal entered - 563967

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/28/2001 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/38 Checkout

AMEREX

Diana/Sean
I am missing the following deal:
1) Enron sells to Powerex MId-C light 3/29 at $140.00

Chris Mallory
Amerex does not recognize deal 563362

BLOOMBERG
All deals are o.k.

PREBON

Chris Mallory
deal 563461
Is this a duplicate of 563460 because Prebon only recognizes 1 deal

deal 563358
Prebon says should be heavy not light hrs.


we should go get some beers after work at that new place near tim called the
station or something.  let me know if you are in.


<<
>
>
>                          BLONDES....CANNOT EXPLAIN THEM
>
>One morning, a blonde called her boyfriend and said, "Please come over and
help me. I have this awesome jigsaw puzzle, and I can't figure out how to
start it."
>
>Her boyfriend asked, "What is it a puzzle of?"
>
>The blonde said,"From the picture on the box, it's a tiger."
>
The blonde's boyfriend figures that he's pretty good at puzzles, so he heads
over to her place. She lets him in the door and shows him where she has the
puzzle spread all over the table. He studies the pieces for a moment, then he
studies the box.
>
>He then turns to her and says, "First, no matter what I do, I'm not going to
>be able to show you how to assemble these pieces to look like the picture
>of that tiger."
>
>"Second, I'd advise you to relax, have a cup of coffee, and put all these
>Frosted Flakes back in the box.


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042624.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred:  27.00 / Final:  26.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


If you have time to attend, please join us...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 11:09 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	03/20/2001 10:53 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Group Meeting

We are still having our group meeting tomorrow at 10.  Please make every
effort to attend.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sorry, I didn't see these deals when I sent the first email.  Kimberly Hundl
had sent you a note about the contact.  Are these deals like the other two
deals, and should be confirmed totally separately from the deal #347356.
Sorry to be so difficult, but we get into trouble everytime we confirm a
Conoco deal because of the special language that needs to be included on
deals that are part of #347356, and we never get any notes that tell us
whether or not it is part of the extension of the original deal.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 08:58
AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/29/2001 06:22 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 507430 and 507417

Jack Wells is the contact for both - I've added his name to deal #507417.
According to Sean Crandall, these deals are separate from 347356. That deal
was a sale, and the deals entered today are all buys. Sean said we're just
buying back the MW we originally sold them. But I think that's the only
connection. Let me know if you need more of an explanation from the traders,
but our take is that these deals are separate.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/29/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 507430 and 507417

Are these two deals part of the original Conoco deal # 347356 that they are
extending or something different?  We need to know because we have to add
something in the confirmation if they are extensions of the original deal.
Also, is Jack Wells the contact for both?

Thanks!


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 01:22 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 01:20 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PUC DRAFT Decision

Here's a copy of the draft.

 - CPUC01-#86861-v1-A0011038_et_al__Minkin_Agenda_Dec___.doc


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001 06:12 PM -----

	Christopher F Calger@ECT
	02/23/2001 06:00 PM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: CDWR

Dave,

Today we entered into an agreement with CDWR.  A condition of any new deal
was payment for power deliveries already made.  We received $10.9MM today so
we executed a 200MW Peak NP-15 Sale from Feb24-Mar31.  CDWR gave us an option
until Mar28 to extend the deal for five years (at a lower price).  This gives
us the opportunity to work out the credit issues.

I plan on speaking with Freeman early next week to re-engage on credit issues
/ Pastoria / other deals.

Chris


eThink Stuff For Sale!
That's right; get your very own eThink apparel, accessories and office
gadgets at the Signature Shop online.  Direct your web browser to the
Signature Shop, and then click "eThink Merchandise" to see the complete
line.  Happy shopping!

eSpeak is back!  Tuesday, December 5 at 10:00 am Houston time, please join
Chairman and CEO Ken Lay for an open-mike eSpeak event.  This is your last
chance of the year to ask Ken questions about the issues most important to
you.  Don't miss it!


Dan,

Comments from Southern Co.

Lets discuss

Phil D. x37912
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 07/28/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

"Haga, Carl H." <CHHaga@southernco.com> on 07/27/2000 05:15:36 PM
To: "'phil.demoes@enron.com'" <phil.demoes@enron.com>
cc: "Kilpatrick, Alan M." <AMKilpat@southernco.com>

Subject: Confirmation Letter

In Alan Kilpatrick's absence, I'm forwarding the latest contract language
Southern Company is proposing for long term gas supply at Elba Island.  You
can reach me at (205) 257-7580 if you have any questions.

>  <<DDNQ02_.DOC>>

 - DDNQ02_.DOC


Good.  The game is in Irving, so I will try to find a hotel around there.  It is also at 7:00pm.  We will get into town early so we can come by and see you guys.  You moved to a new house, right?  I'll keep you posted.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Michael Richter" <mrichter@us.ibm.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 1:26 PM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	Re: Saturday

Darron,
We'll be here. Let us know what works best for you. Hook 'em Horns!
Mike
Michael Richter
Business Partner Sales Specialist
Lotus for eServer, South Central U.S.
IBM Americas' Software,  Partnership Sales
1503 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX  75234
972-280-6574   t/l 542-6574
e-mail  mrichter @us.ibm.com

	"Giron, Darron C." <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>   11/26/2001 10:13 AM  	                 To:        Michael Richter/Dallas/IBM@IBMUS          cc:                  Subject:        Saturday

Mike,
We are going to be in Dallas for the Big XII Championship game on
Saturday night.  I just wanted to see if you guys were going to be in
town.  If so, we would like to come by and see you guys.  Especially the
newest edition.  Let me know.
DG
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


TDSDealTicker
? The Sitara deal Id will show for non EOL deals entered into Sitara

TDS Position Manager
? Groups of groups are supported when defining curve groupings.
? New filters have been added to the Position Manager to allow viewing the
positions associated with "Changed" & "New & Changed" Positions. When looking
at the positions with the changed filter set, the net change in the position
from the official PortCalc is reported.
? When viewing "New" or "All" deals in the Position Manager right-clicking
the mouse over a position for a specific period provides a menu option to
view the deals behind that position.  This feature is not available when
viewing a roll-up desk (i.e. ALL-WEST, ALL-EAST, etc.)

If you have any questions or concerns, please call Russ Severson (713) 853
-7386


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 08:42 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
03/20/2000 06:46 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 3/20

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/20/00.

Regards
Molly


No, I forgot that the agreement was with ECTRIC.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	02/23/2001 12:05 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: SITA

Per Matt Dawson, the SITA agreement has been finalized.  Do we need a copy of
the documents here?


I'm just about half done with the chart, so I thought I would share it with
you for comment.


1.	Governor's Proposal - What do we know / Enron's Response
2.	Legislative Update
3.	UC/CSU Customer Problem w/ AB1X
4.	Other


Looks ok to me.

GISB4@aol.com on 05/15/2001 11:17:46 AM
To:	Gisb@aol.com, GISB1@aol.com
cc:	Jrtemplton@aol.com, wboswell@mcguirewoods.com, shorton@enron.com, hdroberts@marathonoil.com, jcostan@mcguirewoods.com, jgomez@enron.com, jhb@8760.com, novakm@natfuel.com

Subject:	Draft GISB Review for Publication

To the Editorial Review Board,

Attached is the draft for the next issue of the GISB Review.  Please let me
know your comments, corrections or additions by close of business May 18 so
that we can send it to the printers for publication.

Thank you for all of your help.

Jo Ann Garcia
gisb4@aol.com

If you have difficulty retrieving this document, please call the GISB office
at (713) 356-0060.

(The GISB organization follows a privacy policy, which does not permit
distribution of contact information. If you are on a GISB distribution list
and would like to be removed, please email such request to the GISB office
and your email address will be removed. If you would like to add other
participants from your company to this distribution list, please also email
such request to the GISB office.)

 - spring01.wd.doc


well done I think even I would have given up before now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Michael - COO London
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 4:54 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Marcello

It is looking like we have a deal with Marcello that has him reporting into me and John so that will be a great result , we now need to get him signed to a new contract .
Speak to you soon .
Michael


Natalie Mahdi has also just informed me that she has accepted our offer!
Please call her (512/385-0393 or n.mahdi@mail.utexas.edu) and welcome her to
the team!

Thank you for your cultivation efforts!  They are really paying off!


This deal has been changed to a Nymex Swap.

	From:  Mechelle Stevens @ ECT                           11/03/2000 08:26 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Deals that are gas daily in TAGG but counterparty shows Nymex

Errol,

Bank of America is saying that EOL461231 (Q20268) should be NX1 as well.
Please advise when this one has been flipped as well.

Thanks for your help!
Mechelle

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
11/02/2000 02:28 PM
To: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deals that are gas daily in TAGG but counterparty shows Nymex

The below deals have been flipped out to NYMEX swaps.

	From:  Dutch Quigley @ ECT                           11/01/2000 03:28 PM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Deals that are gas daily in TAGG but counterparty shows Nymex

---------------------- Forwarded by Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 03:28
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mechelle Stevens                           11/01/2000 03:27 PM

To: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deals that are gas daily in TAGG but counterparty shows Nymex

Dutch,

Here are the two deals that my counterparties are disputing:

 Bank of America, National Association Q19738.1 EOL459929
 Hess Energy Trading Company LLc Q27284.1 EOL473290

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,
Mechelle


Kay,

I took a whack at redlining for CO#1 Fountain Valley Agreement.  You'll need
to do some touch-ups, I believe.

Let me know what other changes will be necessary.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:37 PM
To: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
Cc: Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com; mtezyk@enron.com; lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com;
Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Alan.Larsen@enron.com; Lisa.Bills@enron.com;
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com
Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley

Gentlemen,

Since we are moving the equipment from WestLB and into TurboPark, and since
we are just about there with the breakout contracts, we need to process
this as change order #1 to the Fountain Valley contract.  I also believe we
need the site specific stuff for this project.

Kay

michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/11/2000 03:17:27 PM

To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com, Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com, mtezyk@enron.com
cc:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject:  CO#6 for Fountain Valley

All,

Attachment contains latest revision reflecting order for two additional
stacks, six power stabilizers and moving cost for the Fountain Valley
Project.  Please review and let me know if additional changes are required
or recommended.

 <<changeorder#6rev2.doc>>
Please note new contact information below:

Mike Storm

          g              GE Aero Energy Products
          ___________________________________
                    A GE Power Systems Business
          Michael E. Storm
          Projects
          Phone: (281) 864-2601  Dial Com 8*326-2601
          Fax:  (281) 864-2116, Pager 888 487 5741

(See attached file: changeorder#6rev2.doc)

 - PSCO_changeorder#1_121100.doc


Thanks Susan.  Can you send me any GTC that would have been for Nov -01 through March 02 business for PGW.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Elledge, Susan
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:03 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Contracts

PGW has only GTCs.  Here are the Husky files.

 << File: Husky Oil GPSA.pdf >>
 << File: Husky Amend.pdf >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Elledge, Susan
Subject:	Contracts

In addition to the Philadelphia Gas Works contracts, could you also look for a Husky Oil Operations Limited with ENA dated September 1, 1999.  Thanks.


Kelly,

I spoke with my friend and he mentioned that Michael was already talking to 2
firms and he
didn't want to recommend a third at this time.  I told him that if anything
changes, let me know.
It was worth a try anyway.  I'll talk to you soon.

Kevin