Hi Dr. Pershing -

Will you please verify the dates again with me?  Is the 3:00 p.m. panel on
Monday or Tuesday?

Thanks.

Rosalee

"PERSHING Jonathan, IEA/LTO" <Jonathan.PERSHING@iea.org> on 04/24/2001
11:08:56 AM
To: "'Kenneth.Lay@enron.com'" <Kenneth.Lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: for Rosalee - re Mr. Lay's participation at IEA ministerial

Dear Rosalee,

 I would again like to thank Mr Lay for agreeing to take part in both
our IEA ministerial session and in the OECD Forum 2001 - Sustainable
Development and the New Economy.  As discussed, he is to chair the first of
two energy panels at the FORUM; his is titled "Fuelling Sustainable
Development".  On his panel will be Mr Kurt Yeager of EPRI (speaking on
hydrocarbon issues), Mr Luis Echavarri, the head of the OECD's Nuclear
Energy Agency (speaking on nuclear power), and Danish Minister of Energy and
Environment, Svend Auken (speaking on renewables and energy efficiency).
The panel is scheduled to take place starting at 3pm at the Cit, des
Sciences et de l'Industrie, in La Villete, in northern Paris.

As I believe I noted in our previous e-mail communications, while the IEA is
responsible for organising our ministerial session and the substantive
issues related to the energy panels on the FORUM, the OECD is doing the
FORUM logistics.  They have therefore asked that I forward to all speakers
the following note (see below). It asks that Mr Lay provide a number of
logistical inputs, including a biography and photo, as well as information
on any remarks he might choose to make. I note that as the chair of the
first energy panel, he may not wish to make a formal presentation -- but
time does permit this if he wishes, and the decision is at his discretion.
I would appreciate being a cc on any material you send to the OECD so we can
keep our files current.

On our own side, the IEA concluded its Governing Board Meeting last Friday,
and finally approved the ministerial session agenda and arrangements.  While
Mr Priddle will be sending out a formal invitation and set of background
documents to Mr Lay this week, I wanted to give you a heads up and find out
if you had any "last-minute" questions which I might help answer.

In addition, I note that your last e-mail indicated Mrs Lay will be in Paris
during our session.  Some of our ministerial representatives are also
planning to bring spouses (in particular US Energy Secretary Abraham, who is
coming with his wife) -- do you think Mrs Lay might wish to participate in
any events during this period with any of these others?  If you let us know,
we would be happy to make arrangements.

Also, please let us know if others will be travelling with Mr Lay, and if we
might facilitate their logistics.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes,

Jonathan Pershing

________________________
Jonathan C. Pershing, PhD.
Head, Energy and Environment Division
International Energy Agency
75739 PARIS Cedex 15
FRANCE
Tel:  (33-1)40 57 67 20
Fax:  (33-1)40 57 67 39
e-mail: jonathan.pershing@iea.org

**********************
OECD ATTACHMENT

 We will be writing to you shortly concerning the final title and
time of your session, and how the session will be conducted. If you have any
questions that you wish to raise in the meantime, please do not hesitate to
contact John West, Forum Director, who can be reached at (33.1) 45.24.80.25,
or by e-mail at john.west@oecd.org.  In the meantime, I would be very
grateful if you could provide us with the following information.

YOUR ARRIVAL AT THE FORUM VENUE
 As you may know, the Forum is being held at the Cit, des Sciences et
de l'Industrie, La Villette, 30, avenue Corentin-Cariou, 75930 Paris cedex
19, Telephone : (33-1) 40 05 70 00.  More information about how to access
the La Villette conference centre is available on our Internet site at
http://www.oecd.org/forum2001/about/transport.htm .

  We recommend that you arrive at least one hour before your
session starts.  On arrival, you will be met by the OECD protocol team and
taken to the "Speakers' Lounge" where you can meet the other speakers and
moderator.  Once your travel arrangements are finalised, we would be
grateful if you could send us your arrival and departure times on the
enclosed Speakers Administration Form.

Speakers Administration Form:

 (SEE ATTACHMENT)

YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION

Short career biography (1/2 page A4) in French and English
Photograph (colour or black/white)

 The biography should be sent as a word document by return email
along with a photograph in jpeg or tiff format or an original. This material
is required as soon as possible.  It will be included on the Forum web site
and printed in the conference documentation, which will be given to all
delegates on arrival at the Forum.

AUDIO VISUAL REQUIREMENTS

  Please complete the enclosed Speakers Administration Form,
which asks you to detail your audio-visual requirements.  Please note that
because of the expected size of the audience, overhead projector slides are
not suitable and 35mm slides or graphic presentations (PowerPoint) should be
used.  If you wish to use graphic presentations and/or video we will need
your materials provided ahead of the event as hard copy, on disc or by
email. You will also need to bring a disc with you.

  There will be interpretation into English and French
throughout the sessions.

ACCOMMODATION & TRAVEL

  If you require overnight accommodation near La Villette, we
recommend that you consult the following website that provides information
on hotels where discount prices have been negotiated -
http://www.expotel.co.uk/?EVENTCODE=OECD2001.

  I would also like to draw to your attention that discounted
travel is available on Air France and Eurostar -- please consult the Forum
internet site at http://www.oecd.org/forum2001/about/transport.htm for more
information.

CONFERENCE SOCIAL EVENTS

  You are invited to attend the whole Forum. Information about
social events, included special social events for speakers will be furnished
to you shortly.

ACCOMPANYING PERSONS

  We would also be very grateful if you could inform us of any
persons who may be accompanying you to the Forum.  They will naturally be
given free entrance to all Forum events.

PRESS AND PUBLICITY

  The Forum is attracting substantial media attention and we
would like to know if you would be interested in participating in interviews
or photocall opportunities.

  Meggan Dissly (meggan.dissly@oecd.org - Tel:
33.1.45.24.80.94) from the OECD Media Relations Division, is responsible for
Forum media relations and may be in contact with your office regarding
possible press opportunities. Please could you confirm the appropriate press
contact in your office.

  If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. John West or myself.  Thank you again for your participation in the
Forum and I look forward to meeting you in Paris.

 Your sincerely,

Nadine N'Diaye-Robinson
Internet site and Operations Manager
OECD Forum 2001 - Sustainable Development and the New Economy
http://www.oecd.org/Forum2001/
* Nadine.Ndiaye-Robinson@OECD.org
( +33 1. 45.24.80.61
: +33 1. 44.30.63.46

 - Speaker Admin form.doc


I think I have the formulas fixed in this one.


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/25/2001 06:08 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/24/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Notice of CPUC gas infrastructure workshop

FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/24/2001 04:25 PM -----

 - Notice for gas infrastructure workshop.doc


Southern Company

SPP


No special requirements, but it's good to keep track of in case we want a
point of contact.  Thanks

	John Wack@EES
	09/22/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Samuel Harrell/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Associations

Steve,  a recent hire within my group of Risk Management ,  Samuel  Harrell
is on two energy associations.   They are the  Association of Energy Services
Professionals International (AESP) and the American Association of Blacks in
Energy (AABE).  Sam is a member of good standing in both and has recently
been nominated to join the Board of Directors for the AESP.   I was not sure
if Enron had any special requirements concerning registration of employees in
associations or not.    If I need to do anything specific I would appreciate
your guidance.  Hopefully this will work as the needed notice.    Thanks


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Matthew  . Commons
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: MC111501
Report Total: $104.62
Amount Due Employee: $104.62

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Bagwell, Jennifer J
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Wenz, Michelle; Ortiz, Frances; Scott, Susan M.; Jenkins, Beth;
Capestany, Mari; Hightower, Jill; Zimmerman, Sam; Baukney, Scott; Quinn,
Kristin
Subject: FW: Enron Board of Directors

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmons, Suzette
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:31 PM
To: McClain, Jennifer; McCarroll, Zachary; Peters, Elizabeth; Wood,
Brian; Kistler, Dave; Barnes, Corbin; Terp, Brian; Vicens, Carlos;
Bagwell, Jennifer J; Erwin, Ben
Subject: FW: Enron Board of Directors

I love cookie monster!!!


The Texas statute allows for full collection of stranded costs with a final
determination of stranded costs in 2004 and interim collection in 2002 and
2003 based on a Commission estimate.  The Commission bases its estimate of
stranded costs on the ECOM (Excess Costs Over Market) Model.  The ECOM model
computes the difference between the revenues a utility would receive in a
regulated environment versus the revenues a utility would receive if it sold
all of its generation at market prices (the market price in the ECOM Model is
based on a Combined Cycle Combustion Turbine).

In 1998 the Commission estimated more than $4 Billion in stranded costs based
on the ECOM Model.  Because stranded costs are the difference between the
market value and the book value of utility generating assets, the Commission
ordered utilities to "mitigate" stranded costs by increasing depreciation of
generating assets.  The accelerated depreciation, came from two sources:

 1. Redirected depreciation -- Utilities were allowed to defer depreciation
of their wires assets and increase depreciation on generating assets; and,
 2. Application of Excess Earnings -- instead of decreasing utility rates the
Commission set a cap on earnings and directed the utilities to apply any
earnings above the cap to depreciating generating assets.

Because of the unexpected rise in natural gas prices the market price in the
ECOM model rose significantly above the weighted average price of the
regulated side which is weighted by coal and nuclear.  This caused the 2001
estimate of stranded costs to be severely negative.  Even more negative than
the amounts of redirected depreciation and application of excess earnings.

Enron argued at the Commission that because the estimate of stranded cost was
negative the accelerated depreciation was unnecessary.  Consequently, we
argued that the money spent on mitigation should be used to reduce wires
rates.  The utilities argued that they should keep mitigation until the final
determination of stranded costs in 2004.  The Commission ruled in Enron's
favor.

Sylvester Turner filed H.B. 2107 to address this situation, however, rather
than simply reducing wires charges, the bill as filed would reduce utility
rates making it more difficult to compete.  We are working to amend the bill
so that the credit for redirected depreciation and excess earnings goes only
to reducing wires rates and that any negative stranded costs beyond that
amount would be refunded directly to ratepayers.


I'll get started on Phil's pc and ship Kathy's next week.  You owe $50 or
whatever you want to contribute.

Thanks Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven.J.Kean@enron.com [mailto:Steven.J.Kean@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 6:46 AM
To: rob.kean@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: Phil's Birthday

I'm in.  A;lso, I don't think we have settled up on Mom and Dad's xmas
present yet.  What do I owe?

"Rob Kean"
<rob.kean@worldne        To:     "Doug & Karen Reiman
\(E-mail\)"
t.att.net>               <dkreiman@mcleodusa.net>,
"Steve & Melissa Kean
\(E-mail\)" <skean@enron.com>,
"Melissa Kean
02/05/2001 09:05         \(E-mail\)" <kean@rice.edu>
PM                       cc:
Please respond to        Subject:     Phil's Birthday
rob.kean

It's alittle early to be talking about Phil's birhtday but I have had some
conversations with him about replacing his PC with a more modern one that I
will build for him.  I want to know if you want to go in with me. He'll get
the PC in the near future but I don't expect anyone to contribute until his
birthday.

Here's the way it would work: we give Phil a new PC, I send an old Compaq
of
ours to Kathy and Alan Wedig, Phil sends his old PC to some friends of mine
who live in Duluth, MN.  That means that our entire family will be
connected.

If not, I would send the Old Compaq to Phil otherwise and then he could
send
his old one to Kathy and Alan.  The only problem with this scenario is that
Phil's old PC is getting a little too old.  Our friends in Duluth wouldn't
mind getting an old PC because they've never owned one.  I thought that
Phil
would benefit the most from getting a brand new PC.  The old Compaq is will
still be okay for a while and Kathy should be fine with it.

What do you guys think?  If i do this right, Kathy would have a PC for her
birhtday in March.

Rob


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron on
04/05/2001 08:54 AM ---------------------------

Cindy Stark
04/05/2001 09:04 AM
To: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Advisory Council meeting

Vanessa:

 Upon further review of Stan's business schedule, he has decided against
attending the April 11 meeting, as his calendar is just really full!   He
does still plan to attend the dinner on April 10.   Would you please amend
the attendee list to reflect this, and if Mr. Lay or Mr. Skilling have a
problem with Stan not attending the meeting on the 11th, please let us know.

Thanks,
Cindy

Vanessa Groscrand
04/03/2001 12:09 PM

To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/HOU/ECT, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES,
CAROL BROWN/ENRON@enronxgate, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron Advisory Council meeting

Attached is the agenda for the Enron Advisory Council meeting on April
10-11.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Vanessa


Loan Decision:           Referred

Application Number:   725068.01

   Decision Date:       4/5/2001

Borrower Information:

   Applicant:              Don Cliff Baughman

Product Information:  Personal Loan

Special Instructions:
Your loan request has been sent to our main office for further review.
You will be notified of the decision within 24-48 hours.

PLEASE NOTE: This is not an active email account, and is only used for
returning loan decisions.  Please do not reply to this email address, as
it will not reach a recipient.


Clement,

As a follow up to Veronica's e-mal to you a few days ago regarding the review
of this guaranty, can you please let me know the status of your review.
Please make note, the redline version attached below (enronredline112900.doc)
was originally drafted by Dan and yourself as an attachment to an Enfolio
Master agreement.  We are anxious to exchange guaranty's to cover exposure in
this volatile price market.

Thank you,
Russell

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
01:46 PM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               12/13/2000 01:43 PM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Coastal Merchant Energy--Outgoing Gty

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
12/13/2000 01:43 PM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza
       12/07/2000 04:17 PM

To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Coastal Merchant Energy--Outgoing Gty

Clement,

Attached below are Coastal's (formerly Engage Energy US) comments to our
outgoing gty format.  The ISDA was recently amended due to Guarantor changes
on their end, so now gty's are also being negotiated.  Please review their
comments and forward either me or Russell your comments to forward on to
Coastal.

Thanks again Clement,

Veronica

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
12/07/2000 03:56 PM ---------------------------

Kiran.Parthasarathy@CMenergy.com on 12/07/2000 03:48:57 PM
To: veronica.espinoza@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Enron - Revised redline

Veronica,
?
As  discussed, I am forwarding my recent email to Russell Diamond on the
proposed  Enron Guaranty for our physical business.? The draft of the
proposed  Guaranty from Coastal Corporation was approved, but Russell wanted
me to send a  copy of that as well.? So, both the documents are  attached.
?
Please?let me know the status earliest  convenient.
?
Thanks!
Kiran Parthasarathy
Coastal Merchant Energy,  L.P.
5 Greenway Plaza
Suite 1200
Houston, TX 77046
713-877-7944 (Voice)
713-297-1605  (Facsimile)
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Parthasarathy, Kiran
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 11:40 AM
To:  'russell.diamond@enron.com'
Subject: Enron - Revised  redline
Importance: High

?Russell,
?
Please find attached  a revised redline Guaranty which incorporates changes
to Enron's standard  format.? In addition, we request??the following
important  changes:
?
(1)???The proposed Guaranty?shouldcover all Obligations and not be  Contract
specific.? Therefore the language in the second paragraph  beginning with the
word 'WHEREAS' needs to be suitably amended by your Attorney  to reflect that
all Obligations??of the  Obligors?are covered and?the
Guaranty??obligations?are not tied to specific  contracts.
?
(2)? Under  Section 2, titled 'MAXIMUM LIMIT',?the Maximum Limit?should notbe
capped for each entity at a  specific amount.Conversely, the limit on
the?Guaranty?shouldbe a  'Unified Maximum'.??Please request your attorney to
make suitable  language changes for this change as well.
?
Please send me a  revised redline earliest convenient for our review.
?
As requested  by you, I am resending the draft for the proposed Coastal
Corporation Guaranty  that Dai Nguyen had?originally sent and on which you
had indicated  acceptance(It is the second attachment from the  left).?
?
?Thanks??
?Kiran  Parthasarathy
Coastal Merchant Energy, L.P.
5 Greenway Plaza
Suite 1200
Houston, TX 77046
713-877-7944 (Voice)
713-297-1605 (Facsimile)
?
 - enronredline112900.doc
 - ENRON.WPD


You are the Best!

	Dianne Seib
	04/11/2001 09:37 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ECC Five Year Deals

Tana,

Further to the voicemail you left me yesterday, the two deals we discussed
when you were here were Lakeside (power) and IPSCO (gas).  Confirmations have
been sent to the counterparty on both of these transactions.

Dianne


Same type of discussions as those other two we sent out for auditors?

	Michael Bridges@ENRON
	03/07/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA Request

Can you please send an NDA to :

Mr. Mike Boyd
KPMG Consulting
7301 N HWY 161
Suite 400
Irving, TX 75039

mboyd@kpmg.com

Phone:  972/ 373-7526
Fax: 509/ 352-5306

Thank you!


i might be up for it though

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kevin.a.boone@accenture.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	bs

Cowboy Mouth is playing at Numbers Wed. night . . . should be alot of sluts
there . . . anyone interested

Regards,

Kevin A. Boone
Accenture -- Houston
Consultant -- Energy
(Octel) 713.837.1638
(Client) 281.848.1619
(C) 713.306.7940
(H) 713.864.4149
Kevin.A.Boone@accenture.com

Our web address is http://www.accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


I don't have copies of anything.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	11/20/00 10:26 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Micron

Can't you just make changes to the one we did for ENA?

Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/20/2000 10:06 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Micron

Tanya,

Will you send me a worksheet?

Thanks!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 11/20/00 10:09 AM -----

	Michael Moulton
	11/20/00 09:56 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Micron

Marie,

Can you put together an ISDA for Micron Technologies.  I hope you had a great
weekend.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Thanks, ,

Mike


Please print 4 execution copies of this from my o drive

Clarksdale/MDEA ILA/extension May 29

Please date the letter today.

Thanks,

kay


Well, this may go down as one of my absolute worst weeks ever.  Hope yours
was better and that you made a full recovery from Steak Night.


Culpepper and Anderson for Toomer, Autry, and Mcnabb


Gerald,

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner on this.  I have sent an email to David Owen about the hazardous waste question.  I will let you know what he says.  However, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we want to make any warranties about potential hazardous waste sources on the property.  At the most, we could make a warranty about the fact, if true, that we have never used the property in such a manner.  David Owen should be able to tell us a little more about the uses of the property.

As far as Item #3 below is concerned, do you know if we have done a title search on the property?  If we need to do a title search, there is a guy in Louisiana that can do it for us.  If we know there is a discrepancy in the chain of title, is there a way to nullify the latest transfer between LRPC to LRCI.

Let me know what you think.  If you think it is necessary to meet to discuss these points, please let me know.

Thanks,

Rakhi
(x3-7871)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Israni, Rakhi
Subject:	FW: Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"P. Keith Daigle" <pkdaigle@neosoft.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22P+2E+20Keith+20Daigle+22+20+3Cpkdaigle+40neosoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02

Gerald:

    I have been contacted by Kim Torres of the Assumption Parish Police
Jury.  She has some questions and concerns about the Purchase & Sale
Agreement, to wit:

1).  They want to add warranty language to ? 4 as follows:

    Seller warrants that it is the record title owner to the property
being sold, and warrants it has good and merchantable title, free of any
and all liens or encumbrances, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
buyer for the same.

    Seller warrants that it is a corporation in good standing and that
persons executing this sale on behalf of seller has valid and binding
authority to do so.

I believe this additional language is acceptable with some minor
revisions which I will do.

2).  They are concerned about the warranty language which covers
hazardous wastes in ? 4.  They tell me that they have not done an
environmental inspection of the property.  They want to know if there
have ever been any underground tanks or other hazardous waste sources on
the property.  They are looking for something in writing that no such
sources existed.

3).  Upon checking the conveyance records, they found that on March 31,
1993, Louisiana Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. sold the property to
Louisiana Resources Co., Inc.  Then, on February 28, 2000, Louisiana
Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. again sold the property to LRCI, Inc.  I
have not done a title exam so I cannot explain this discrepancy.

4).  She gave me the physical address of the property and the name of
the Police Jury President which I will insert in the documents.

Please contact me to discuss our response to these concerns.

Keith


Got a question about the Building Guy?  Ask Beth Stier!  Join Beth, owner of Innovision Communications and the brains behind the Building Guy, on eSpeak this Wednesday, May 23 at 10 a.m. Houston time.  Beth's company manages most of the video production for Enron; find out how!
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your question.  Beth will answer it during her event and you can read the transcript later.

What's new in the Thinkbank (http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage) this week?  Check out the Idea Vault and the latest ideas:  lift peakers, password thumbprints, an anti-money laundering game, administrative assistant computer-based training and even coffee trading!

What will it take to make Enron the World's Leading Company?  Share your thoughts today in eMeet http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf.


I've started to transfer my Dow Jones e-mails into five separate folders
which can be found at:

P:\Scheduling\Dow Jones - Cob\Mead\Mid-C\NP-SP\Palo

You can already access February's files for each of these delivery points,
and prior months will be coming in soon as I have free moments in the day.

Thanks,
Kate

Cara Semperger
02/22/2001 08:15 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

Yeah, people are already asking me where the chart is already

c

   Kate Symes                02/22/2001 08:14 AM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

Here's what I heard back from Tim. Do you want me to go ahead and save the
Dow Jones data to a shareable file in the meantime?

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/22/2001 08:17 AM
---------------------------

TIM HEIZENRADER
02/21/2001 05:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Sarnowski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'm not exactly sure where the spreadsheet on our site comes from. Our
preference is to keep everything in our SQL Server database, and many of the
people that you mentioned have read access to that. When Julie Sarnowski gets
back from vacation next week, let's talk about uploading these data to the
server and providing a central facility for the floor.
Tim

   Kate Symes                02/21/2001 03:19 PM

To: Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Dow Jones Index Prices - Database Access

I'd like to inquire about the Dow Jones index price database currently being
maintained by the Fundamentals group. It's come to my attention - by virtue
of the fact that I receive the Dow Jones data each afternoon - that several
people are interested in having access to those figures. I've had requests
from mid-marketing, trading, and scheduling, and am working with IT to put
the NP-15 and SP-15 data online. Cara Semperger, in particular, relies on the
index prices in order to run one of her reports.

I'm wondering if it  would be possible to give these people access to your
database, or maybe if your group would benefit from the data I receive. Your
spreadsheet looks like a compilation of the documents I receive from Dow
Jones, and one might be more useful for an individual or group than the
other. I don't have a preference either way - I'm more than happy to compile
the reports in a separate folder. Please let me know what works best for you.
(I sit in the middle of the room between Tracy Ngo and Val Sabo.)

Thanks,
Kate


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 02/15/2000 02:49
PM ---------------------------

"Una Chan" <una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com> on 02/15/2000 02:31:53 PM
Please respond to una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Una L. Chan

Hi Chris,

I thought I would send you my new business vCard and a brief description of
my service offerings. I will be sending out hard copies of my business cards
in a few weeks or if I see you at CERI in Calgary, I can give you one then.

SigmaRisk Analytics is a risk management consulting firm for natural gas,
electricity and oil.  Service offerings include evaluation of physical and
financial strategies, risk evaluation and audits, design and implementation
of risk management programs (Front, Middle and Back Offices), risk
management software evaluation, and educational seminars.

Regards,
Una

Una L. Chan, P.Eng., MBA
Principal
SigmaRisk Analytics
Tel: 604-469-2892
Fax: 604-469-2832
E-mail: una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com

 - Una L  Chan.vcf


Lindy, how does this look.  Topock not available.


I'm trying to get off the phone with you know who.  I'd better meet you
downstairs or wherever we are going.


Remind me to check the Harry & David's catalogue for something nifty.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 02:47:40 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Greetings

Got a card we can send Annie? NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:06 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: RE: Greetings

Hi Sweetie,

You know how Paige is about directions, etc.  Feel free to call her,
though.

I ate all vegetables for lunch, but then I had a third cookie.

Annie broke her arm again, and may have to have surgery.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 11:36:45 AM

Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Greetings

I guess you won't want any dinner tonight. That's ok, that means more
chicken for me! You know, it's getting close to time for you to make your
wonderful sausage and cheese balls...

Does Paige want to pick him up and take him to Sharon's? She could drop him
off and I could pick him up. It doesn't matter to me. Do you want me to
call
her?

Love, Neil

----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 9:48 AM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: Greetings

I forgot to pack Michael's speech/language notebook this am.  I did remind
him that today is a Mary Lou day.  He wants Paige to pick him up, but I
don't know how that could work.

The cars are moving on the Pearce Elevated.  You are probably right - you
could go quickest on 10 assuming no construction problems, as 610 may be
crowded.  I wish I would have thought to drive in that way this am.

It is Bosses Day, and there is so much food around here.  I'm on my second
cookie, and I won't even mention the sausage balls and 7 layer dip.

Love,

Kay


Houston Astros Baseball season tickets are available sale to employees at their face value.  The seats range in price from $2,490 to $3,237 for the season, and are located in the box and club levels.

If you're interested in being on the list of potential buyers for Enron's season tickets to the Astro's 2002 home games, please indicate your interest by 4PM, Central Time on Thursday, March 21 via e-mail to Elizabeth Linnell.  In your e-mail, please indicate the number of seats you're interested in purchasing for the full season (no partial season or individual games).  Once the number of interested potential buyers is determined, we'll know whether a lottery process will need to take place to fairly allocate the purchase opportunities and will communicate that to respondents.

Please note that the season begins on Friday, March 29 so payment for the tickets will need to be made early next week.

If you have any questions, please call Elizabeth Linnell at x33896 or Rachel Tobor at x31481.


Karla:

Please inform Henwood that Enron will renew the license for the Prosym
software modules but will not renew the licenses for North American databases.
The software modules to be renewed are:
Base System (Prosym?) (ECOsym is included in the base system)
ASAP/MSTAT
MULTISYM
EMSS interface.

It is not 100% sure that the last module is required. Nevertheless, please
begin the agreement amendment process asap.  I will let you know if there are
modifications soon.

Thanks,
Grant.


Rob,

I have created several Jan01 Texas Phys products.  Could you please approve
them?

Thanks,

Eric


you can go whenever.  just let me know so if you meet me there i can look out
for you around then.  i am going at 630 if you guys want to meet up then.


Jim,

I know the author but  thanks for the lead.

Vince

James D Steffes@EES
02/08/2000 11:41 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)

Vince --

FYI.  Not sure if you had seen this.

Jim Steffes
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 02/08/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------

UC Energy <ucenergy@socrates.berkeley.edu> on 02/07/2000 11:20:29 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc:
Subject: POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)

_________________________________________________________________

       N E W   P O W E R   W O R K I N G   P A P E R

                 Working Paper Series of UCEI
_________________________________________________________________

        POWER Working Paper Email Notification Service (PWPENS)

A service of The University of California Energy Institute's Program on
Workable Energy Regulation (POWER).  All POWER working papers can be
downloaded free of charge from the UCEI website:
http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei  Just follow the link to "POWER Research".

     ________________________________________

"Exotic Options for Interruptible Electricity Supply Contracts" (February
2000)
 PWP-071 by Rajnish Kamat and Shmuel S. Oren.

This paper presents the design and pricing of financial contracts for the
supply and procurement of interruptible electricity service. The proposed
contracts consist of bundling simple forwards with exotic call options that
have two exercise points with different strike prices. Such options allow
hedging and valuation of supply curtailment risk while explicitly
accounting for the notification lead time before curtailment.
The proposed instruments are priced under the traditional GBM price process
assumption and under the more realistic assumption of a mean reverting
price process with jump diffusion. The latter results employ state of the
art Fourier transforms techniques.

Download this paper in Adobe Acrobat format:
http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/PDF/pwp071.pdf

     ________________________________________

If you would like to be removed from this list, please send an email to
Mailto:ucenergy@socrates.berkeley.edu and include UNSUBSCRIBE in the
subject heading.  If you received this email indirectly and would like to
be added to this emailing list, please send an email to
Mailto:ucenergy@socrates.berkeley.edu and include SUBSCRIBE in the subject
heading.


It is the same gas that was going through before we did the Hilcorp deal.
According to Brad, the line is piggable.

Edward D Gottlob
11/21/2000 11:12 AM
To: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerard Krenek/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda
Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Are we going to have some quality problems with this gas?  EDG

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerard Krenek/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jill T
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Well- I have officially NOT heard from Hilcorp after numerous voice and email
messages.  Please plan to have the gas rerouted back down the valley line for
the Dec 1 forward.  Call if you have any questions-

Daren J Farmer
11/21/2000 10:08 AM
To: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HILCORP old ocean volume

Thanks for the info.  I appreciated the call the other day.  It really helps
me out to recieve info early like that.

D

	From:  Mary Jo Johnson                           11/20/2000 03:38 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A
Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HILCORP old ocean volume

According to Gary Hanks, we would like to have the gas on the valley line
anyway
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
03:26 PM ---------------------------
To: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Producer service group?

I can not believe you are sending emails form Hawaii!!!!  You are crazy.  I
took care of Camden for the month-
It is now 330 and Hilcorp has not responded.  I spoke with Jerry Bubert
several times today- emailed Mike LAnnou and left messages, and had him
paged, and copied Hildebrand (the president).  If we don't hear by 4pm, we
are supposed to bypass the gas...........


Hi Sara,
We are still researching your request. Please allow one to two business days for a respond .
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Okechukwu, Charles
Subject: RE: American Express credit

11001

-----Original Message-----
From: Okechukwu, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Subject: RE: American Express credit

Sara- Please provide me with the last four digits of your American Express Card as soon as possible. I will need this information in order  trace on these charges.
Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Okechukwu, Charles
Subject: American Express credit

This is an email from SARA SHACKLETON <mailto:sara.shackleton@enron.com> for additional information.
Please confirm it and send a response as soon as possible.

FirstName:	 SARA
LastName: 	SHACKLETON
Subject: 	American Express credit
From: 	sara.shackleton@enron.com <mailto:sara.shackleton@enron.com>
Phone: 	713-853-5620

Comments/Questions:
Two unsuccessful orders on 11/13/01 in the amounts of $94.71 and $83.35 were charged to my credit card and should be credited to the account. The online ordering problem was corrected the following day and my account was charged $83.35.


I do not know if everybody knows about the change in the price for the SPS
sale. The cost is now according to Roger
Peak:  $31.20
Off-Peak: $28.25

Geir


I am tired...........................................................................................................

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jafry, Rahil
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 3:28 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	You looked tired

get some rest this weekend.

Regards,
- R


Molly,

Thanks for the update. Two points.

Please, let Neil McGregor know that many possible proposals were floated
with regard to Anshuman and there was some noise in the system.
We need L1 visa anyway and we decided to go ahead an arrange it.
I shall also write to him and explain the confusion.

Also, if I have the choice between upsetting Neil or Jeffs (Shankman and
Skilling),
I shall choose Neil.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           01/24/2001 10:13 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Vince:  Apparently Neil McGregor became upset when he received Margaret
Daffin's email.    He is saying, however, that Anshuman will only be in
Houston for one month, and you had mentioned six months when we spoke
earlier.   It really doesn't make any difference since he will need to get an
L1 visa under either circumstance, but I thought you might want to see his
email.

Molly
---------------------- Forwarded by Molly Magee/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 10:09
AM ---------------------------

Margaret Daffin
01/24/2001 09:57 AM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Molly:  per our conversation today.  Please let me know the status so that I
can proceed with the visa process.
Thanks
Margaret

---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Neil McGregor@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/24/2001 05:18 AM
To: Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Anshuman is not moving or immigrating to the US. We are allowing him to work
for a 1month assignment in the US with Enron. Please carry out the necessary
approvals and visa's on this basis.
Neil McGregor
CEO Dabhol Power

Margaret Daffin@ECT
01/23/2001 10:31 PM
To: anshuman.srivastav@enron.com
cc: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Callahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Harsimran
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: L1 Visa - Anshuman Shrivastava

Anshuman:  I have been asked to contact you regarding your possible move to
Houston, Texas.  In order that I may begin the process of getting you an L1
immigration visa, I will need you to complete the attached visa questionnaire
and return it to me with copies of the following documents:

a copy of all pages of your passport, even if blank
copies of all previous US visas issued
an updated resume, showing months and years
copies of all Diplomas and transcripts received
if you have dependent family members coming to the States with you, copies of
their passports

Please send to my attention, via Fedex to:

Enron Corp.
3 Allen Center, 3AC2026A
333 Clay Street
Houston, TX 77002

Please call me with any questions you may have at 713-345-5083.


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 02:09 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:04 PM

To: 8145895507&Lori Bunce&BeldonBlake@mailfax
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, John Singer/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Volume

Hi Lori,

I believe we are still pulling our Local Production from you behind NYSEG,
please let me know ASAP if you disagree.

I am going to pull    1620 dth's/day  , again, let me know if this creates a
problem for you.

Thanks!


is it ok for me to give Tracey and Georganne copies of PG&E book?  thanks
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 10:02 AM -----

	Tracey Irvin/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/02/2001 09:08 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: PG&E Letter

Elizabeth,

I work for Georganne and we are trying to find all the pieces in the risk
books.  It would be very helpful if we could get the appendices that are
mentioned in the document below.  Could you help me with this?

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hodges, Georganne
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:00 AM
To: Scott, Laura; Dawes, Cheryl
Cc: Irvin, Tracey
Subject: FW: PG&E Letter
Importance: High

Here are the numbers that we need to tie into.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Hodges, Georganne
Subject: PG&E Letter

Copy of PG&E letter

----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 04/29/2001 11:14 AM -----

	Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate 04/26/2001 05:19 PM 	   To: Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: PG&E Letter

Can you please forward a copy of the letter we sent out Tuesday morning to
Georgeanne Hodges so that she has all of the correct values?  Thanks.


Enron Fuels Company, I

This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on December 12, 2000.
Particulars are:

 Parent Company: Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc. - 100%

 Business: To hold the general partnership interest in Enron Fuels Caribbean,
L.P.

 Directors and Officers: See attachment.

 Employees: No

 Foreign Qualifications: Texas

 Company No.: 1347-EFC1

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

Enron Fuels Company, II

This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on December 12, 2000.
Particulars are:

 Parent Company: Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc. - 100%

 Business: To hold the general partnership interest in Enron Fuels Caribbean,
L.P.

 Directors and Officers: See attachment.

 Employees: No

 Foreign Qualifications: None

 Company No.: 1347-EFC1

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

Enron Fuels Caribbean, L.P.

This limited partnership was formed in Delaware on December 14, 2000.
Particulars are:

 Parent Company: GP:  Enron Fuels Company I, LLC - 1%
   LP:  Enron Fuels Company II, LLC - 99%

 Business: Selling motor gasoline, diesel and other refined products and
storing such products in Puerto Rico.

 Employees: No

 Foreign Qualifications: Texas

 Company No.: 1359-EFCA

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

ENA Upstream Assets Company, LLC

This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on December 20, 2000.
Particulars are:

 Parent Company: Enron North America Corp. - 100%

 Business: To purchase and hold assets for ENA's purchases at the wellhead.

 Directors and Officers: See attachment.

 Employees: No

 Foreign Qualifications: Texas

 Company No.: 1375-EUAC

Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group.

For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet.

PLEASE NOTE:
 Deb Korkmas - copy of evidence being sent by interoffice mail
 Robert Wilcott - please apply for FEIN
 Treasury - banking resolutions adopted December 20, 2000 for ENA Upstream
Assets Company, LLC
 Sylvia Hu - Minute Book and two seals have been ordered

Lillian R. Bailey
Administrator
Corporate Services
EB4804A
Phone 713/853-3577
Fax 713/646-8007


As we spoke of by phone. Thanks.

 <<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


Please plan to attend this meeting held in conf. room ECS 06716 at 10:00 this morning.

Melissa
ext. 36145

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:58 AM
To:	Barbe, Robin; Boyt, Eric; Breese, Mark; Breslau, Craig; Concannon, Ruth; Germany, Chris; Griffith, John; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Lagrasta, Fred; Little, Kelli; Luce, Laura; Moon, Eric; Murrell, Russell E; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Ring, Andrea; Taylor, Craig; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Nemec, Gerald
Cc:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Subject:	Contract Review

Please plan to attend a gas contract review kick-off meeting this morning (12/12/01) at 10:00 AM (location TBA).  You have been selected to review one or more physical gas contracts in an effort to expidite preservation of value in these agreements for ENA.


Please accept this invitation to the Bid Week Procedure Meeting, it will automatically populate into your Outlook schedule. This meeting will be facilitated by the management team.  Attendance is mandatory and lunch will be provided.

Thank you


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000012685&Page=
MyReq.


thank you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kanji, Ayesha
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Strong October for Pulp

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Hay-Roe [mailto:hayroe@equityresearchassociates.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:54 PM
To: Ross Hay-Roe
Cc: Lee Hay-Roe; Kevin Mason
Subject: Strong October for Pulp

Attached is Today's Comment for Wednesday, November 14, 2001.  "011114
Strong October for Pulp" is in PDF format and requires Adobe Acrobat Reader
5.0 to open.

Regards,

Ross Hay-Roe
hayroe@equityresearchassociates.com

Equity Research Associates
PO Box 189
110 - 5580 Wharf Road
Sechelt, BC
CANADA    V0N 3A0

Tel: (604) 740-9916
Fax: (604) 740-9817

Copyright ? EQUITY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. All rights reserved. No part of the
attached publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form
(electronic, mechanical, photocopy, facsimile, etc.) without the express
written consent of EQUITY RESEARCH ASSOCIATES.

Directors, shareholders or employees of Equity Research Associates may be
beneficial owners of securities referred to herein.  The information
contained herein was obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable,
however such information is provided on the understanding that Equity
Research Associates is not responsible for financial losses or damages of
any kind whatsoever resulting from action taken in reliance thereon, or from
inaccuracies therein.  Neither the information nor any opinion expressed
herein constitutes a solicitation by Equity Research Associates or any of
its employees for the purchase or sale of any securities.


Attached for your review is a revised draft of the Licensing  Agreement with Accenture.  Ted has  reviewed the draft and his comments are reflected.  We look forward to finalizing and making  the distribution to Accenture on Monday.
Following are some thoughts for your consideration:
1.             Definition of Enron Platform.  Andy's definition of "Enron Platform"  excluded products substantially dissimilar to those listed on the platform, to  which we added the qualification of listed on the platform as of the  Effective Date.  Is this  correct?  In addition, is there a  possibility that Enron might split up the platform (i.e., by product type), and  then sell off certain segments?  If  so, we may need to further modify the definition.
2.          License Grants.   Though the license grant with respect to Customer-Specific Transaction  Data in Section 3.1 is limited to Accenture's right to re-format the data, we  advise adding some restrictions to specifically negate their right to manipulate  the data in certain ways, as per your previous business discussions.  In addition, with respect to the  SmartClient Software license in Section 3.3, Accenture will be permitted to  freely modify the software for their own purposes, except to the extent the  software is being used for receiving data through the Enron Data Feed.  We need to confirm that the appropriate  restrictions have been imposed.
3.             Minimum Annual Payments.   Section 5.1(b) provides that the Minimum Annual Payment is due at the end  of each Contract Year.  Is this  satisfactory from the accounting perspective, or do we want more flexibility for  purposes of booking these payments?
4.          Audit Rights.  In  Section 5.4(b), we have added a limited right to do an operational audit, i.e.,  the audit can be initiated only on claim of breach, and can be performed only by  a third party.  We would like to  discuss expanding this right.
5.             Acceleration Rights on Termination.  Section 7.6(b) permits us to accelerate  the Minimum Annual Payments on Accenture's default for breach of contract.  Is this the appropriate trigger?
6.             Accenture Warranties.   Should we add any warranties to Section 8.2?
7.             Accenture Indemnity.   We have expanded Accenture's indemnity obligation in Section 9.2(a), to  cover any claims arising out the TSH Services or their modifications to the  SmartClient Software.  The only  exception we have permitted is for data errors verified as Enron errors.
8.             "Readable" Data.  We  have used the term "readable" in referring to the data in various places in the  Agreement, including Section 4.1(a)(ii).   In using this term, we intend to differentiate between the static data  received by an Enron Customer, and the data to be received, "read" and then  re-formatted by Accenture.  We may  need to select a more precise term with Jay's  assistance.

 - June 3 License Agreement with Accenture [by V&E].DOC


Eric,

I have a number of case studies on Enron but not the one on Sutton Bridge.
I know that Peter Tufano was working on it  but when  I checked the HBS
site and tried to purchase it, I could not locate it.

When I talked to Peter a few months ago, he told me that the case study was
ready
 and he  was going through Enron's internal approvals.

I cc Mark Palmer on it. Maybe he knows about this specific case study.

I wander if it was completed, given Sutton Bridge developments.

Vince

Eric Gadd
11/10/2000 05:49 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Case Studies

Vince-

Where might I find copies of the case studies Enron has published?  I'm
particularly interested in the Sutton Bridge publication for Havard but would
like to know if there is a library of case studies.


I think we should restrict Peter's memo's to 50 words or less.  Please
advise.  Lavo.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 06/22/2000
05:49 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane @ ECT                           06/22/2000 01:05 PM

Sent by: Nella Cappelletto@ECT
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Alberta Power Purchase Arrangement Auction

I have considered on a preliminary basis the potential use of a limited
liability subsidiary of Enron Canada Corp. for the purposes of bidding on the
PPAs.  The issues and preliminary answers are in summary the following:

1. It is not clear that Alberta would permit qualification of another Enron
Canada entity at this point.  I believe that it would be more sellable if
that Enron Canada entity was a replacement to Enron Canada as a Qualified
Bidder, rather than an additional Qualified Bidder, and if that Enron Canada
entity was similarly guaranteed by Enron Corp.  I need to discuss this matter
further with Rob Hemstock, Alberta and Charles River.

2. With respect to the Enron Corp. Guarantee, as mentioned, it is not free
from doubt, but I believe that the Guarantee is only in respect of bidding
on, and paying for a PPA and not for ongoing performance or payment
obligations under the PPA.  In other words, the Guarantee guarantees
"Obligations" which relate to the bidding process and not to the PPAs
themselves, although there is some wording which could be viewed as including
in "Obligations" ongoing obligations with respect to the PPAs themselves.

3. With respect to limiting liability, such Enron Canada entity would limit
exposure for a successfully acquired PPA to the contributed capital to such
Enron Canada entity, assuming the Enron Corp. Guarantee would not extend past
the bidding process as noted in paragraph 2 above, and subject to the common
law relating to "piercing the corporate veil", which in essence means that
the limited liability protection of a shareholder through a corporate entity
can be looked through if the courts determine that the corporate entity was
established merely for the purposes of avoiding liabilities properly
attributable to the shareholder.  Although this is a difficult test to prove
given the intended purposes of corporate and other limited liability
entities, it is best to establish the limited liability entity in such a way
that it has the greatest appearance of an operating company (for example, a
separate board of directors, separate management, separate employees,
separate operating agreements and leases, etc.).  As mentioned, however, it
is all a matter of degree and generally speaking it is difficult to establish
a case where the courts will allow the "corporate veil" protecting
shareholders to be "pierced".

4. With respect to capturing tax losses incurred in the limited liability
entity, if Enron Canada is the sole shareholder so that there is no change of
control on a winding-up into Enron Canada, Enron Canada can avail of tax
losses incurred in the Enron Canada entity through a winding-up.  Obviously,
however, this would mean that Enron Canada takes on the liabilities of the
special purpose entity as a result of the winding-up, including the
liabilities for any acquired PPA.  Otherwise, the general rule is that the
tax losses, if any, would be captured inside in the Enron Canada entity and
would not be available to be used against Enron Canada's taxable income.

5. With respect to Project Stanley, there is really no established case
authority directly on point, but the better view is that any sanction, if and
when imposed on Enron Canada, would be imposed in a way that would prevent
Enron Canada from indirectly avoiding the application of the sanction, such
as by moving certain business operations into a special purpose entity.  In
other words, if Canada or Alberta were intent on suspending or affecting
Enron Canada's abilities to transact through the PPAs or otherwise in the
Alberta Power Pool, it is likely that the sanction would be imposed upon
Enron Canada and its affiliated entities also transacting through the Power
Pool.

Based upon the preliminary answers, please let me know if you want a more
detailed legal opinion to consider these issues further and whether Hemstock
and I should be approaching the Government to qualify a special purpose
entity.

Regards, Peter


Dear Mark

Before they give their final confirmation that the game can go ahead in
Poland, our Polish lawyers would like me to forward to them some information
as to the critria Enron use to decide who can and can't trade online.  I
guess that they are wanting to know whether the criteria are basically
objective i.e based on credit ratings etc or whether they are more
subjective.  In practice, what sort of companies do Enron refuse online
trading access to?

Thanks

Rachel

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Hansen [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 7:43 PM
To: rachel.murton@linklaters.com; Mark Taylor
Cc: Dave Samuels
Subject: Re: Enron game

Rachel:

Mark Taylor will finalize all issues relating to the EnronOnline Games in my
absence.  Please follow up with Mark to advise re the status of Italy,
Norway
and Sweden (and any other countries that we may be able to move to the
"Approved
List.")  Also, please confirm that for the purpose of screening individuals
who
should not play the game, the appropriate question is "Country of
Residence."

Thank you so much for all of your invaluable assistance on this project!

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 01:37 PM -----
|--------+------------------------>
|        |          Leslie Hansen |
|        |                        |
|        |          08/25/2000    |
|        |          11:44 AM      |
|        |                        |
|--------+------------------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |      To:     "Murton, Rachel" <rachel.murton@linklaters.com>@ENRON
|
  |      cc:     Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT
|
  |      Subject:     Re: Enron game(Document link: Leslie Hansen)
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Rachel:

I don't think we're going to be interested in reimbursing for connection
costs
so I think we should just keep France in the lists of "not approved."

With regard to the data protection issue, I have actually sent Justin an
e-mail
on this various issue to determine if our current legal & privacy language
is
sufficient or if we need additional language in the rules.  I will forward
you
that e-mail.  If you go into the Registration Screen of the demo game, you
will
see that individual participants will be required to enter their name,
e-mail,
address and telephone number.

I look forward to your comments on this issue.

Leslie

|--------+------------------------------>
|        |          "Murton, Rachel"    |
|        |          <rachel.murton@linkl|
|        |          aters.com>          |
|        |                              |
|        |          08/25/2000 10:47 AM |
|        |                              |
|--------+------------------------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     "'leslie.hansen@enron.com'" <leslie.hansen@enron.com>
|
  |       cc:     "'justin.boyd@enron.com'" <justin.boyd@enron.com>,
"Didizian,|
  |       Marly" <marly.didizian@linklaters.com>
|
  |       Subject:     Enron game
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

 Dear Leslie

France
I have now read through the French advice.  The DGCCRF (lottery regulators)
have confirmed that a game offered on a website may well be regarded as
involving a financial contribution due to the cost of Internet
communication.  This means that the game probably does fall foul of French
lottery legislation.   One way round this might be to offer to reimburse
connection costs.  If this is done, then there are still a couple of
"indirect contribution" issues to sort out (these relate to being seen not
to promote Enron, and so may fall away as in other jurisdictions, although
French law on these matters is generally stricter).  There is also a
possibility that a bailiff needs to be appointed  to adjudicate in the case
of disupute, but I get the impression from the French advice that this could
probably be got round by further discussing the matter with the DGCCRF.

Is offering to reimburse connection costs feasible? - if it isn't then,
there is presumably little point in "tidying up" the indirect contribution"
and "bailiff" issues.

The game will not be a lottery if no prize is awarded i.e. there must be an
expectation of profit/gain. Hence in theory,  not awarding the prize to a
French resident should allow the game to be played in France.  The French
lawyers seemed to have concerns about how this could be done practically - I
am not sure I understand their concerns, and have asked them for
clarification.  I assume that Enrons French customers are French companies,
and that we would need to exclude employees of such companies, together with
employees of other Enron Customers (for example UK companies) who happen to
reside in France. I have asked our colleagues in France for clarification
that such exclusions would suffice, and will forward you the essence of
their replies.

I set out  below a list of countries where the game would be lawful,
providing prizes are not awarded to residents of that country.

Netherlands
Belgium
Sweden
[France] - subject to clarification of our French lawyers concerns
Italy

As mentioned in my previous e-mail, some of these countries may move into
the "approved" list anyway.  I have not received express advice on this
particular issue from Norway - but there advice implies that not awarding
prizes would be ok, and if the tax issue scan be sorted out, Norway may move
to the approved list anyway.  I will however ask them to confirm the "not
awarding prizes" point for completeness.  I have not received advice on this
point from Spain.

You may recall that for the Euro 2000 game, colleagues in Belgium were
concerned that if prizes are not to be awarded to Belgium residents, then
this needs to be made very clear from an early stage, so that Enron are not
misleading partcipants of that country into thinking that they will be
awarded a prize if they are not going to be.  If ineligbility for prizes is
placed prominently in the rules, and partcipants have to read the rules
before playing, then I  guess that this covers this issue.  Although none of
the advice from the other jurisdictions has mentioned this point, I think it
would apply anywhere where partcipants cannot be awarded prizes.

Countries where Enron could avoid liability by using disclaimers pointing
out that residents of that particular country cannot play and by having an
online registration process are:

Spain (based on previous Euro 2000 advice)
Italy
Netherlands
Denmark
Sweden

Belgium - but note the comments made re Euro 2000 that there is a very
slight chance that an online registartion process might raise evidential
difficulties i.e. Enron might not be able to prove in a court that Belgium
participants had been properly advised of their ineligibility.  Belgium law
requires written proof of such terms in contracts with consumers.

Rules

I have not had chance to review the rules in detail.  One issue that may be
important from a European point of view is data protection i.e. protection
of personal data including names and addresses of partcipants and consent to
trnsfer data - I will look into this and let you know.  As mentioned above,
the inelegibility of residents of certain jurisdictions for prizes will need
to be included in the "eligibility" section.

Miscellaneous

One issue which was touched upon in a previous e-mail was whether the word
"Olympic" could be used in a disclaimer.  I will look into this further and
get back to you on this matter next week.  As requested, I will summarize
the Olympic advice for you also.

Regards

Rachel

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________


Karl,

Thanks a lot. I have passed this information to Grant Masson
who worked here on a related problem.
He will get in touch with you regarding this technology.

Vince

Karl Tomlinson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/24/2000 06:00 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Outage Tracker Option And Background

Vince,

To follow up on the idea of a means for effectively tracking instantanious
plant faliure utilising either system frequency or connection point voltage.

The system frequency phase shift across a network will probably be the best
option as this would allow alll significant deviations to be tracked along
with relative network performance from a few points.

I am currently chasing NEMMCO (AU system operator) to get hold of a few weeks
of 4 second metering data for the whole system to see if there is enough
measurement consistency to prove one of the ideas.

The idea follows along the lines (literally !) that when a unit fails it will
introduce a shock into the system and reduce system frequency, which is then
reacted to by frequency control services offered in by generators. The drop
in frequency is noticable across the whole network and as one option may
change the phase shift across the whole grid. The phase shift across the
network is constantly changing due to loads and power factor correctrion
devices switching on and off, however a unit failure may be distinct.

The second option relates to how a unit fails, whereby if a circuit breaker
is involved as in the case of uncontrolled shutdowns, then the outage will
cause an RF pulse that should propogate across some of the network.
Transformers will attenuate the pulse, however it should be detectable many
miles away from the fault location. Measure the arrival time at several point
on the network, work out the shift and backtrack on the network. Part of the
solution is already proven in lightning trackers. The solution may be made
more simple by detecting the exact point on the sinewave that the unit failed
(i.e. measuring the three phases at 1MHz and then sending the data through a
DSP). This solution is more complex, however this should allow unit failure
to be pinpointed to a station. The timing base for each of the nodes may be
sourced from GPS timing, self locating at the same time !

Will send you some links and documents for potentail hardware and setups.

Karl.


T.J. can I get setup with Enron Online.  UserID etc...

Thanks!!!!


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 07:34
AM ---------------------------

Matthew Arnold

08/02/2000 06:46 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wv love story

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
06:44 PM ---------------------------

Jonathon Pielop
07/31/2000 07:55 AM
To: Mo Bawa/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


do i need to come and slap some sense in you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I already did in the previous e mails

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Why don't you tell me what the real truth is.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:29 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I think we both know the real truth

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Not nasty.  Just truthful.  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

you dont have to be nasty

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you are a nut!  ok i'm sorry.  i admit it.  i am attracted to men who always have really red eyes and who talk bad about me behind computers!  how did you ever figure me out?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

the first step to recovery is admitting it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:24 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

oh shit you are saying that i have a crush on you?  i am finally catching on.  don't make me come down there and kick your butt!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

just admit it

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

on yourself?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok a crush

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:21 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

what's an infatuation?  you being a brat?  that will never pass

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

dont worry it is probably just an infatuation that will pass

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:19 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

that makes you an eve bigger brat.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

YOU ARE A BRAT!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whatever, ok if thats what you want me to believe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

quit flattering yourself.  it was a male looking at you and he told me!  how do you feel about that?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

stop lying, you dont have to be embarrased, I understand

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

then i guess it is a fact that a male was staring at you.

i am laughing so hard!!!! :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I wasnt accusing you I was just stating a fact

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't tell because then you would acuse them of staring at you too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no I dont know how it works, and who told you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't you have messenger

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nobody told you, dont lie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

damn you caught me.  and for your information, i didn't notice it...someone told me about it!  so whatever to you mr. allergy man!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

if you werent always staring at me you wouldnt notice my eyes


here is our website

http://football69.commissioner.com/mp/join?league=kourn&owner=&random=3598&

the rules are on the site at the bottom of the page

we will start

1 QB
2 RB
3 WR
1 TE
1 K
1 Def/st

our draft is next sunday at noon at BW-3 in rice


To all Market Participants:

		As noted in previous announcements and forums, an improved
OASIS site will replace the existing site effective May 31, 2001.  All of
the existing PMI/OASIS reports that are currently available on both the
Internet and the private SI network (WEnet) will be replaced with the new
OASIS site.  In addition, all of the download templates will be replaced
with new XML technology.  If you are unsure about the effects these changes
may have on your systems, please contact your Client Representative
immediately or send a correspondence to:

xmlwg@caiso.com


Amy 3-1628


Rod,
Here is the memo I mentioned in the Shared Employees Agreement e-mail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hawkins, Don
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 7:54 AM
To:	Teal, Mike; Weatherford, Allan; Mertz, Tom; Jolly, Rich; Gaines, David; Maestas, Gary; Asante, Ben; Kendrick, William; Clark, Scott; LeBeau, Randy; Gilbert, Tom; Odneal, Dave; McGillivray, RR; Gilbert, Tom; Odneal, Dave; Stephens, LD; Gottsponer, Morgan; Bonnstetter, Mike
Cc:	Lowry, Phil; Craig, Rick; Nelson, Mike; Rice, Randy; Pribble, Dan; Martin, Jerry D.; Melton, Richard ; Brassfield, Morris; Harris, Linda C.; Keller, John R.; Shafer, John; Raker, Colleen; Soldano, Louis; Smith, Sarabeth
Subject:	EAMR Transactions

This memo is being forwarded to you to address issues that have developed during recent Enron Asset Management Resources (EAMR) transactions and to establish appropriate procedures for going forward.  EAMR, as you are probably aware, is an affiliate of Enron Transportation Services Company that performs services for third parties as well as other Enron affiliate companies.

When EAMR enters into a contract with non Enron customers to deliver services, EAMR assumes all of the risk for any losses in the transaction  Additionally, EAMR is not to be supported financially by the affiliated pipelines.  All costs such as employee payroll expenses, travel and other related employee expenses, equipment usage fees, etc  associated with an employee performing services for a customer under an EAMR transaction must be accurately recorded pursuant to prudent accounting procedures.

Going forward,  to ensure that there are no financial or contractual obligations that are not in the best interest of EAMR, the following process will be used on all transactions.

1) Cost estimates for services through EAMR will be sent to Sarabeth Smith in Houston for review and approval.  Sarabeth will ensure that all costs and appropriate margins are included in the cost structure and then release it through a non-binding agreement for presentation to the customer by appropriate marketing personnel.  Cost estimates, given to customers outside of this step in the process, run the possibility of having to be retracted due to the risk of committing EAMR to a transaction that is not contractually or financially sound.

2) It is the responsibility of every employee performing services for EAMR to be diligent in recording their time and expenses required to perform the services to the appropriately assigned project number.  Monthly reviews of the expenses associated with each project will be conducted to ensure that all costs have been accurately recorded.  Sarabeth will be the point of contact with the transaction originator, contract administration and legal to ensure draft agreements as well as the final agreement have been coordinated through all appropriate groups.   Legal agreements will not be issued without proper sign-off of authorization.

3) All contracts must adhere to fundamental risk parameters set forth by management.  These mandates are very clear concerning contract language and operating parameters for EAMR transactions.  Your cooperation by adhering to the processes described in this memo is critical to  the continued success of EAMR as a revenue generating entity as well as another "marketing tool" for the customer.

Contact Information for EAMR will Sarabeth Smith at 713-345-5023, sarabeth.smith@enron.com, 1400 Smith 3AC-3147, Houston, TX  77002.

Please pass this memo on to team members or other members of your staff that currently work or may work on EAMR transactions.

Thanks for your support in this endeavor.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/15/2000 05:55
PM ---------------------------

Christi L Nicolay@ECT
06/15/2000 05:41 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO PPA

Several thoughts from federal reg./transmission side:
I haven't worked with a VEPCO interconnection agreement yet, but many times
there are requirements that the generator is required to provide emergency
power to the interconnected transmission provider, in which case you would
want the interconnection agreement to cover all costs you would incur to
replace the energy at a different location (usually it is difficult to get
this agreement, so you should check and then factor that into the equation).
I would be happy to look at the interconnection agreement with you.
Interconnection of generation is a separate process from requesting
transmission.  It appears that VEPCO has to buy the transmission (or use its
network transmission) when the Delivery Point is the plant.  Enron will have
to purchase transmission on VEPCO if it is selling to third parties off the
plant and will have to purchase transmission on other systems if it wants to
supply at an alternate delivery point.  Please discuss this with Kevin
Presto's tranmission people (Bill Rust on 31).  Enron cannot use VEPCO's
network transmission to delivery to third parties.
Is this plant in the VEPCO queue yet?  Also, FERC has issued some recent
rulings that deal with time limits on system impact studies, etc.  While
VEPCO is probably incentivized to get this built, you want to make sure that
you do not lose optionality in selling to third parties from the plant due to
transmission constraints.  A request for transmission on OASIS is the only
way to ensure deliverability to third parties.
3.5 (c) Intra-day scheduling--You may have hourly transmission risk for an
increase.  Unless you buy longer term firm, you will deliver from other
sources using hourly non-firm, which is the lowest priority of transmission
and subject to getting cut.  You may want to consider doing this on
best/reasonable efforts basis.  (Also, even if you purchase
daily/monthly/yearly firm to serve third parties, if you change the point of
receipt or point of delivery temporarily, your request is treated as
non-firm.)
12.4--Currently VEPCO is interested in joining the Alliance ISO (an RTO that
has not been approved by FERC yet--competing ISO to Midwest ISO), but since
FERC has not approved any RTO for VEPCO yet, there could be significant
changes in the transmission charges/methods of obtaining
transmission/grandfathering of current transmission, etc during this
contract.  Make sure with the ENA attorneys that this out/increase in price
covers that circumstance.
Underlying tranmission rates on VEPCO or any other provider can change at
most any time, subject to the provider filing a rate case.  Therefore, any
current transmission rates shown on OASIS are not necessarily what you will
pay over the term of any transmission that Enron may purchase to serve this
contract.  Generally, transmission providers will not agree to fixed rates.

Tom Chapman
06/13/2000 06:07 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

Christi--

This is the note that I received on Tuesday June 13.  This is a relatively
early draft of the PPA.

I think that we still have to purchase the land associated with the sites and
do the due diligence on the site with regards to some of the siting issues.
IN addition, in NC we are going to get a CPCN to site the plant to speed up
the regulatory process in the NCUC.  I think that this will make the issue
less contentious because of the NCUC's acceptance of the Dynegy plant at
Rockingham that had a PPA with Duke Power.

Using the Dynegy plant as a guideline, their only stumbling block was their
gas agreeement.  They built a bypass off Transco.  We would be taking gas
from the LDC of Rocky Mount.  Having talked with the regulatory folks at the
NCUC who handle gas issues, this is the preferred route.  So, I do not think
that we have any major state issues.  I think that right now we are simply
working on some of the siting issues.

That being said, I will let you take a look at the PPA and let me know or
Jeff Keenan (or even Heather Kroll or Ozzie Pagan) if you think that there
are some transmission issues or other issues on the federal level.

Thanks.

Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 06:04
PM ---------------------------

Linda J Simmons
06/13/2000 08:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VEPCO PPA

----- Forwarded by Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 08:44 AM -----

	"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com>
	06/12/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: <linda.j.simmons@enron.com>, <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com>
		 cc: "William Frederking" <wfrederking@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: VEPCO PPA

Lisa:  Attached is a draft of the Power Purchase Agreement with VEPCO, based
on the current version of the term sheet.  In preparing the draft, we did
encounter several additional questions for Enron's consideration.  These are
noted with brackets and, in some cases, italicized notes, in the draft and
are also highlighted below.  You may want to address these issues before this
goes to VEPCO.

Cover and first page-- Should the party to the agreement (for the moment) be
ENA or a special purpose company?

Definitions--  We included a defined term "Emergency Start-Up" (a start up or
increase in energy scheduled during a day) and a place in Exhibit A to
include a price for this, although this was not covered in the term sheet.

Section 2.2--  We included a provision for VEPCO to take test energy (energy
charge only; no demand charge)--do you want this?

Section 2.3--  This was taken from the term sheet, but is it correct that COD
will be July 1 (since the demand charge is supposed to start June 1?)  Also,
it would be best to define "commencement of construction" to avoid
controversy down the road.  We could either do this now or put in a
placeholder that indicates it needs to be defined or be silent, whichever is
your preference.  Also, bear in mind that we have not included a specific
remedy (e.g., liquidated damages) if the Seller does not achieve that
milestone on time.  Under the default provision (Section 8.1(c)), there would
be a 30 day period to cure before Buyer could terminate (extendible to 90
days if a longer period of time is needed and Seller diligently pursues the
cure).  Would you prefer the right to pay ld's and extend the time period?

Section 3.1(b)--  Should the 1400 hour limitation apply to all sales under
this PPA or only sales from the Facility?  I.e., would you use this Agreement
to sell to VEPCO power in addition to what would be available from the
Facility?  Also, is this a calendar year limitation--i.e., could they take
1400 hours in the period June-Dec. 2001 or does the 1400 hours need to be
pro-rated for the first year?

Section 3.4-- Since this is not a base load plant, the normal definition of
Availability as the number of hours in a year of operations compared to the
total hours in the year would not seem to be applicable.  Instead, we stated
that the Facility would be capable of being available 92% of the year (other
than due to Force Majeure and 336 hours (2 weeks) of scheduled
maintenance)--i.e., that if they tried to schedule it, it is expected to be
available.  Is that what Enron intended?  Additionally, the term sheet stated
that a remedy for failure to meet Availability would need to be agreed--why
wouldn't cost of cover damages be appropriate? Also, please note that we
included language stating that Seller will not perform maintenance during
peak periods.

Section 3.5(b)-- Please note the bracketed language re taking Blocks of
Energy.  We have 50 MW minimum blocks but the capacity is 223--should we
allow the last Block to be 23 if they've scheduled all the rest?

Section 3.5(c)-- Please see the bracketed language at the end of this Section.

Section 4.7-- Should there a required minimum take of Energy?

Article 6-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form of PPA we used as a model did not
have any provisions on metering.  (See placeholder note in Article 6.)  Do
you want to add such a provision, ignore it or just include a placeholder for
now?

Section 9.1-- Is 30 days from invoice correct for the payment due date or
would you prefer a shorter period?

Article 15-- The Genco/Santee Cooper form had mediation as a required step
prior to arbitration.  Should we keep that?  Also, the form of arbitration is
"baseball" arbitration--i.e.,  the arbitrators have to chose one party's
position or the other's.  Is that what you want?

Section 16.2--  We used New York for governing law, on the premise that it
will be difficult to get VEPCO to agree to Texas law and we would not
recommend Virginia law for this contract.

Exhibit A-- There are a number of questions on the pricing exhibit--please
see the bracketed notes therein.

Please call and let us know how you would like to proceed on this draft.

 - VEPPPA.DOC


Son:
David A. Lang
1004 E. 44th Street
Austin, Texas 78757


- 12-3-2001CF.xls


This unfortunately is true.  We, ETS, have agreed to an amount which is flat to previous years.  The IT has new managment in, primarily Kerry Roper formerly Clean Fuels, to try to fix or actually create a billing system similar to what we had.  Rod and Steve Hotte have been involved in this.  At this point in time, there is not a better alternative.

Tracy

Cindy Stark
02/01/2001 02:10 PM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Billing Update

Hello, Tracy!    I am curious (and somewhat concerned because they are ALWAYS overcharging me for items I don't have or don't use!) about Paige's second paragraph.   Are her statements true?    And if so, who is going to "police" this to make sure that we are actually getting what we're paying for?

Cindy

---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 02:06 PM ---------------------------
From:	Paige Cox/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 06:51 PM
To:	Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Carolyn Evans/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	Billing Update

Hi Cindy,

Looks like we've gotten to the bottom of the billing issue. The IT billing group is going to refund you $360.00 for erroneous charges over the last year. I had them audit your bill, and they sent me a list of the things that shouldn't have been billed in the first place, and this is the amount you are due. You should notice it on your January bill. Please let me know if you do not see this (you'll probably get the bill in Feb.)

Secondly, the billing system is being changed as of Feb 1. Now that we are using the SAP system, you will no longer receive an itemized bill. All IT charges will be sent to the business unit, at a pre allocated/predetemined amount. This amount was agreed to by all business units. Basically everyone will be billed a single amount for all IT usage, and the Business Unit will be charged, not the individual.

The only things you will be billed for are as follows:
Long distance charges
Market Data Application charges

These things can actually be traced back to the individual(s).

This should make life much simpler.

I apologize, again, for the delay in handling this situation.

Paige


John,

I did some preliminary work on your question concerning oil use at the
Cleburne, Texas plant. See the attached document.

 I just answered all of your questions in an effort to save time. I'm still
summarizing the procedures that are used for gas nominations. Call me with
any questions.

Michael Mazowita
White Pine Energy, LLC

Phone: (248) 442-4823
Fax: (248) 477-5729
Cell: (248) 345-4002

John Griffith
07/17/2000 10:03 AM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Mazowita/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Cornhusker

Rick and Mike,

When you talk to plant manager I have a few other questions regarding the
fuel oil.

1)  What exact oil can they burn? What sulphur content?

2)  How much oil is in storage at the plant?

3)  What is the storage capacity at the plant?

4)  Are there any oil contracts at this time?

5)  How do they normally buy oil?

6)  How is the oil transported to the plant?

7)  Are there any transport contracts for oil?

8)  What is the efficiency for the oil at the plant?

9)  What are the costs to burn oil?  Any downtime due to this?  Any costs to
switch?  Time it takes to switch?

10)  What are the decisions that the plant goes through to decide to switch?

11)  What are the emission concerns?  Are they long emission credits?  Do
they get credits annually?  How many?

12)  Does Brazos have any control over burning oil vs. burning natural gas?

13)  Can the plant run totally on oil?

14)  Any costs to switch back to natural gas?

Please let me know if you need anything from me.  Thanks.

John


These documents will be executed Thursday.

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/00 09:47 PM -----

	"Rosser, Dianna" <drosser@velaw.com>
	12/27/00 09:16 PM

		 To: "'mwilson@milbank.com'" <mwilson@milbank.com>, "'rwight@milbank.com'"
<rwight@milbank.com>, "'philip.levy@chase.com'" <philip.levy@chase.com>,
"'melissa.c.vogel@chase.com'" <melissa.c.vogel@chase.com>,
"'ian.james@mourant.com'" <ian.james@mourant.com>,
"'kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com'" <kevin_p_kearns@fleet.com>,
"'renee_r_nadler@fleet.com'" <renee_r_nadler@fleet.com>,
"'richard_aidala@fleet.com'" <richard_aidala@fleet.com>,
"'jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com'" <jill_a_calabrese@fleet.com>,
"'james_r_mcbride@fleet.com'" <james_r_mcbride@fleet.com>,
"'mark_serice@fleet.com'" <mark_serice@fleet.com>, "'sean_o'neill@fleet.com'"
<sean_o'neill@fleet.com>
		 cc: "'teresa.g.bushman@enron.com'" <teresa.g.bushman@enron.com>, "Joseph
Deffner (E-mail)" <joseph.deffner@enron.com>, "Shouse, August"
<AShouse@velaw.com>
		 Subject: PDF format of transaction documents

Attached please find copies of the following documents, in PDF format to
facilitate consistent pagination:

1. Forward Sale Agreement
2. Confirmation Letter of Forward Sale
3. Margin Agreement
4. Margin Price Confirmation Letter
5. Enron Guaranty
6. Consent and Agreement (Enron)
7. Consent and Agreement (ENAC)
8. Letter regarding duplicate delivery of information
9. V&E opinion

Please feel free to contact August Shouse or me with any questions or
comments.

Regards,

Dianna J. Rosser
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Business and International Section
3300 First City Tower
1001 Fannin Street
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
tel: (713) 758-3688
fax: (713) 615-5899
email: drosser@velaw.com

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<404950_3.pdf>>   <<404984_2.pdf>>   <<404917_5.pdf>>   <<404980_2.pdf>>
 <<404948_2.pdf>>   <<404983_4.pdf>>   <<404981_5.pdf>>   <<404914_4.pdf>>
 <<404942_5.pdf>>

 - 404950_3.pdf
 - 404984_2.pdf
 - 404917_5.pdf
 - 404980_2.pdf
 - 404948_2.pdf
 - 404983_4.pdf
 - 404981_5.pdf
 - 404914_4.pdf
 - 404942_5.pdf


Tammy --

Here is the report from Government Affairs.

Thanks,

Jim