Hi Jewel,

Sorry, I was not available to visit with you when you called the other day,
but things have been extremely busy around here, and plus, there is very
little room for privacy.

In answer to your question, there are no special requirements.  Back in the
day, they would have been looking for actual pipeline scheduling experience,
but anymore, the liquidity for gas schedulers is so low, that they will
consider most people, with an analytical or coordinative type background.  I
think it's one of those things that once you "get your foot in the door", you
can move on from there.

Just be aware, that if you were to become a gas scheduler, it may require
working on weekends, and late nights from time to time.

As far as the next step, I would suggest that you just simply send an e-mail
to George Smith, Manager of Logistics on the Central Desk, and ask him if he
has time to visit with you.  I think that by simply expressing an interest,
and learning what his expectations are of a scheduler, and also, learning
what you can expect to learn from him, should serve as the first step.
Also, if he is interested, and does not have a position currently open, then
he will pass on your name to some of the other managers.  They're actually
pretty good about that!  I'll mention to George that you may give him a call.

Let me know if you have any further questions, or want to visit some more!

Take care!


Jane,

See if this one will work better for you.

-Ina
---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 02:36 PM
---------------------------

	From:  suzanne brown                           01/16/2001 02:10 PM

Sent by: Suzanne Brown
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ClickAtHome Pilot 3 Program - An Invitation

---------------------- Forwarded by Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 02:06
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  ClickAtHome Project Team @ ENRON                           01/11/2001
09:12 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ClickAtHomePilot3 mailing
cc:  (bcc: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT)
Subject: ClickAtHome Pilot 3 Program - An Invitation

Want to Get Innovative at Home?

We are excited to extend an invitation to you to participate in Pilot 3 of
Enron's new ClickAtHome program.

The ClickAtHome program is Enron's innovative solution to provide eligible
employees with a high-end computer and high-speed internet connection.

If you are interested in participating in the ClickAtHome pilot program,
please read about  "How to get started in Pilot 3" by clicking the link below.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/pilot3.ppt

Details pilot member expectations, commitments, and a tentative pilot time
table.

Ordering will begin on Friday, January 12th.    To get more information about
the program or place your order, visit http://clickathomepilot.enron.com

Dell will be in Houston to assist you with any questions you may have :
 1/16/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/17/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/18/2001  8:00:00 AM-5:00:00 PM
 1/19/2001  8:00:00 AM-2:30:00 PM
 Location: EB568 and EB560

If you have questions, please send them to clickathomepilot3@enron.com.

We look forward to enabling you to Get Innovative at Home!

ClickAtHome Project Team


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/20/2000
10:42 AM ---------------------------

"Jan Svajian" <Jan.Svajian@dvn.com> on 06/20/2000 10:43:12 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Nom Change on Tennessee

See attached.

 - Enron Nom Change.xls


They are still trying to get people onto the system.  What is going on with
getting that terminal set up so I lawyers can review the products?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:03 PM -----

	Sheri Thomas
	02/26/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Tradespark

Any update?  People are anxious to get on the system.

We are working with them on some other initiatives, and would like to get
this signed asap.

Thanks
Sheri

Mark Greenberg@ENRON
02/20/2001 01:02 PM
To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Tradespark

Sheri -

I was only able to get to the public face pages.  I have not attempted access
in the last couple of days.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Sheri Thomas@ECT
	02/20/2001 10:02 AM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Tradespark

Were you guys ever able to get into the site?  Just checking on the status.
thanks
Sheri


Hello Sara,

I talked to Chuck Kaufmann in Cinergy's credit dept. concerning the ongoing
issues.  Basically, he has agreed to the cross-default levels of 50/100
million.  He is going to look further into the guaranty issue and get back to
me on this. I will keep you updated.

Thanks
Russell


Jim:
In response to your request at the meeting at the Omni I have attached my thoughts regarding RTO development.  But as only an occasional substitute attendee at a few MISO meetings you should rely on Mike Roan's comments to a much greater extent.  Should you have any questions please contact me.


This transaction was never in the trading books and all P&L and decision-making was within the origination group.   I may have recommended that Ozzie buy the balance of year coal, however, all $ impacts and decisions were within the control of orig/corp development.

Therefore, Heather, Ozzie and Don Miller are the parties that must deal with any of the contractual issues and intra-company monetary issues.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mcgowan, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	Pagan, Ozzie; Kroll, Heather
Cc:	Mcclellan, George; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	NC Power Holdings deal

Ozzie and Heather,

In February time frame EGM Coal desk sold firm delivered coal to NC Power Holdings balance of year (2001) for $72/ton.  We also did a requirements deal beyond this point.  My understanding was Ozzie made the balance of the year trade per Kevin Presto.  Ozzie also verified this understanding in a phone conversation with me a couple of weeks back.  NC Power Holdings is currently not taking any coal on there take or pay obligation.

There is liquidated damages associated with this transaction which need to be settled.  It will also be prudent to determine if the remaining tonnage obligation for balance of the year needs to be settled now or in the future.

Please let me know who is specifically responsible to settle this trade.

KJM


FYI, Docket No. EL00-95-12 (market monitoring and mitigation) appears on the
Commission's agenda for next Wednesday, as agenda item CAE-42.


thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Abel, Chris
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Thapar, Raj; Beck, Sally; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth
Cc: Considine, Keith; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan; Wilson, Shona
Subject: RE: priorities for 1/16

The status of the 12/31 DPR is as follows:

North America Gas:  P&L and Bench  preliminary, final will be received soon.
North America Power East: Final information received
North America Power West: Final information received
North America Power Canada: Final information received
EES Gas and Power: Information currently not available
South America Gas and Power: Final information received
Enron Europe:  Attempting to coordinate with Europe about reporting only ECTRIC piece.
Global Products: Status unknown
Weather: Final should be available next week
Coal: Final should be available 1/17
Freight: Status unknown
Emissions: Status unknown
Global Risk Markets: Final information received
Equity, Convertible Arb, Foreign Currency: no positions to report on
Interest Rate: Data not available
Paper, Lumber and Steel: Final information received
Broadband, Advertising and DRAM: Final expected next week
PGE: Final information received
ETS: Status unknown
Merchant Portfolio: Final information received
Capital Portfolio: Status unknown

I am still trying to find out whether we will receive information from several groups.  I will keep you updated on the progress.

Chris Abel

-----Original Message-----

From: Wilson, Shona

Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:34 AM

To: Thapar, Raj; Beck, Sally; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth

Cc: Abel, Chris; Considine, Keith; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan

Subject: priorities for 1/16 and accomplishments for 1/15

1/15 -

curve val: we have scoped the curve val project and have discussed it with PwC. I've talked to E&Y in general terms and have a meeting with them on this at 10 today. We have also had initial discussions with the different risk groups about the holes in the curve construction & upload process and our deliverable for the end of today is a list of where the holes are and a plan to fill those holes.

We spent significant time with E&Y to go over the make up of the DPR.

We are working with the different groups on the 12/31 DPR information. So far, we have only had one request for it. My gut feeling is that EIM & ENA are complete, but ECTRIC & EGM need a bit more time. Chris should have a complete status ready for today.

Our systems are fixed (hooray!). Yesterday we caught up on the Enovate and Bridgeline DPRs as well as spent significant time with IT to get the systems fixed.

Susie is still working on the SEC VAR for 10/31, 11/30, and will start 12/31 as soon as all of the information is available. She has also started the net assets work.

Lastly, the whole group had CAS training so once we get access to the system we can start pulling info by counterparty.

Today our goals are:

Curve val - finalize memo (getting agreement from PwC, E&Y, and Enron estate), put listing of curve construction plan fwd, start determining what the different buckets of curves are and what tools are available to perform analysis

Field more E&Y DPR qus

Have a complete status report on the 12/31 DPR.

Prepare ongoing reporting (Enovate, Bridgeline etc).

I also hope to get some time to familarize myself with the CAS environment.

Regards

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Rogers, Benjamin
Cc:	Meredith, Kevin
Subject:	FW: ISO NY Real time financial index

Ben,

Please see the descriptions below:

A US Power financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website, multiplied by the number of applicable hours in such Determination Period. Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the term of the Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for Transactions which are less than one month will be the fifth (5th) Business Day following the last day of the month that includes the Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) for Transactions which are one month or longer will be the fifth (5th) Business Day following the date on which the Floating Price is determinable.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the Product description on the Website.
The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the real-time prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during the applicable hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent System Operator on its official web site currently located at http://www.nyiso.com/oasis/index.html, or any successor thereto, under the headings "Real Time Market LBMP - Zonal; LBMP ($/MWHr); WEST (61752)"  (the "Index").
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours (MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300 (11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time.  'Delivery Day' means a day during the term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hansen, Leslie
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:45 AM
To:	Walker, Chris
Subject:	RE: ISO NY Real time financial index

Chris:

The language is fine, except replace "Zonal Prices" as the third heading reference below with "LBMP ($/MWHr)" -- ex. "Real Time Market LBMP - Zonal; LBMP ($/MWHr); WEST (61752)".

Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Chris
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Hansen, Leslie
Cc:	Meredith, Kevin; Rogers, Benjamin
Subject:	ISO NY Real time financial index

Leslie,

Please review the index language below that Ben Rogers would like to offer on EOL.

Thanks,

Chris
3-7533

ISO NY Z-A RT

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the real-time prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during the applicable hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent System Operator on its official web site currently located at http://www.nyiso.com/oasis/index.html, or any successor thereto, under the headings "Real Time Market LBMP - Zonal; LBMP ($/MWHr); WEST (61752)"  (the "Index").

ISO NY Z-G RT

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the real-time prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during the applicable hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent System Operator on its official web site currently located at http://www.nyiso.com/oasis/index.html, or any successor thereto, under the headings "Real Time Market LBMP - Zonal; LBMP ($/MWHr); HUD VL (61758)"  (the "Index").

ISO NY Z-J RT

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the real-time prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during the applicable hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent System Operator on its official web site currently located at http://www.nyiso.com/oasis/index.html, or any successor thereto, under the headings "Real Time Market LBMP - Zonal; LBMP ($/MWHr); N.Y.C. (61761)"  (the "Index").


Attached is the ETS IT Statement of Work template.  It has not been changed
yet to reflect the GPG to ETS name change.


----- Forwarded by Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 06:50 PM -----

	"Dilg, Joe" <jdilg@velaw.com>
	08/02/2000 06:37 PM

		 To: "'mklepper@skadden.com'" <mklepper@skadden.com>,
"'jtindell@skadden.com'" <jtindell@skadden.com>, "'lbrasher@skadden.com'"
<lbrasher@skadden.com>
		 cc: "Schuler, Lance (Enron)" <lance.schuler-Legal@enron.com>, "Joor, William
E., III" <wjoor@velaw.com>, "Shouse, August" <AShouse@velaw.com>, "Barber,
Shelley" <SBarber@velaw.com>, "Martin, J. Clark" <cmartin@velaw.com>
		 Subject: Name License Agreement

 <<287956_1.doc>> Marty, attached is another version of the license
agreement marked to indicate a few additional changes suggested by our
client. Joe Dilg

 - 287956_1.doc


You have been identified as a current subscriber to an RDI database. These databases include:

Base Case
PowerDat
GasDat
CoalDat

This contract is expiring and as part of the renegotiation we will need your acceptance to allocate the costs of this information to your Co# and RC

Please respond with the desired application, Co# and RC prior to March 5th.

Thank you

Paula Corey
Sr. Contracts Manager
713.853.9948


Will alan handle this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 08:52 AM -----

	Susan Musch@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	09/11/2000 09:26 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Marie
Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ECT@ENRON, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ECT@ENRON, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON,
Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com@ENRON, Morten
E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Jeff Blumenthal@ECT, Mark Tawney@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New Profile additions

John and Tana,

The attached is fine from a tax perspective.

Best regards,
Susan

From: John Viverito@ENRON on 09/10/2000 10:17 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ECT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Morten E
Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Susan Musch/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: New Profile additions

Tana-

I see that ENA is a contemplated counterparty for Japanese weather
derivatives.  There are both legal and tax issues that require
consideration.

I am unsure if Susan Musch has had the opportunity to review the tax issues,
therefore I have copied her on this note.

With regard to Japanese legal issues, there are certain matters that must be
dealt with in the GTCs, if entering into transactions between ENA and
Japanese counterparties are being considered, including issues of an
underlying legitimate business purpose to avoid gambling restrictions etc.

Please inform me with whom I should be in contact to ensure that these issues
are appropriately handled.

Thanks,

John

	Tana Jones@ECT
	09/08/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Profile additions

Please note new products.  Let me know if you have any issues or concerns
with any of these.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 10:52 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	09/08/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Profile additions

Please see the attached spreadsheet with new additions in blue.  A couple of
Enron entity names changes (Enron Australia Finance Pty limited to Enron
Japan Corp.)  Also note that Sea Freight Fin Swap BCI 4 and Sea Freight Fin
Swap BCI 7 have been renamed from previous UK prefix.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.  Please begin using the attached spreadsheet on
Monday, Sept. 11.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Mark,

Here at Enron Global E&P I have polled my CEO, Jeff Sherrick, and my CFO/CAO,
Howard Selzer, and neither they nor I have anything to report.

Am I supposed to poll everyone in the business unit -- 50 people in Houston
and 250 overseas?

Stephen.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:43 PM
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/19/99 02:57 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           11/19/99 02:14 PM

To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cell phone numbers

If you need to get hold of us next week, Mark and my cell phone numbers are
as follows:

Mark:  011 44 7881 512 535 (dial like you were calling London)
Tana:  (713) 206-8080


Do we have anything on this?  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron on 02/04/2001
06:28 AM ---------------------------

Diann Huddleson@EES
02/02/2001 04:42 PM
To: Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: I-6 penalty charges

Nancy, do you know anything about  a Order from CA Governor on I6 rate
relief?  If the customers are being granted some relief, I need to know so we
can exempt these charges from the bills.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES on 02/02/2001
04:41 PM ---------------------------
From: Leonard Pettis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on
02/02/2001 04:13 PM
To: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
Subject: I-6 penalty charges

Diann, per Tom's request I have copied the SR  in an e-mail to you.  Let me
know if you need additional information.

  SR Customer (Tim Ball) received  January invoice for delivered service
11/20 -12/20 2000 with interruptible penalty charges. He wants know should he
pay the full amount or deduct the penalty and pay for the delivered
services?  This is according to his interpretation of the California
governor's order on I6 rate relief
Len Pettis  CEM
Enron Energy Services
611 Anton Boulevard
Suite 700
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Toll Free  800-522-1802 x 242
Voice      714-429-8166
Pager      877-452-1224
Pager e-mail 8774521224@skytel.com
e-mail          lpettis@enron.com


message comes up unknown file format..cannont access


The Washington Global Finance office is chartered with the responsibility to
support Enron's activities with the Washington-based financing institutions -
OPIC, EXIM, and the multilateral institutions - the World Bank and IFC and
the InterAmerican Development Bank.  Every project financing done by the
company in the emerging markets over the past several years has involved
these agencies and this year is no exception.

 In the past six months we have supported five projects before these
institutions:
  Cuiaba - Disbursement is now projected for mid-August.  OPIC is pleased
with the progress.  We have had to tweak the process to keep the project
moving forward; that process has been successful.  We have also been heavily
involved in the environmental aspects of the project, working with the
project team on the Environmental Health and Safety program, the
international NGOs and the Conservation Program to keep these aspects on
track.
  Gaza -  We have been heavily involved throughout the first half of the year
getting OPIC to a Board vote which was successful in March.  We used the
Department of State and other agencies to pressure OPIC politically to do the
deal.  Since the board vote the developers have been focussed on the
financing with Arab Bank but we are now in a process of pushing State to get
OPIC to move forward to financial close on reasonable financial lterms and
conditions.
  Guatemala barge mounted plant at Puerto Quertzal - OPIC and MARAD are to
provide financing. We have been working with the finance team to keep the
project moving forward and are now looking at fijnancial close by the end of
the summer.
  Argentina water for the Province of Buenos Aires -   This office is pushing
both the financing parties, OPIC and IDB, and Azurix to an end of September
Board approval on a financing that started late spring.  the time frame is
extremely short but unless we keep on schedule we will lose close to six
months.  We are driving the schjedule and then overseeing all parties to keep
the financing on track, so far successfully.
  RioGen -  We have been working with the Rio team to ensure that
consultation on the environmental assessment is conducted properly to avoid
Cuiaba type problems and help the IDB financing.  We are getting the
requirements with the team sorted out so that the process will go forward in
an appropriate manner.

 In the past six months we have supported the development efforts of the
following projects:
  Nigeria - We were heavily involved in getting the World Bank to back away
from their opposition to our project, as well as getting the State
Department, DOE and Treasury to aggressively support our efforts to conclude
a deal in Lagos.  We finally persuaded the Bank to take the position that it
was not fully current on the status of the project and so could not comment.
The USG supported our efforts and did help the process by which Enron was
finally able to conclude a deal.
  Camisea - We were heavily involved in sorting out the environmental
requirements for this project in Peru to go forward.  We spent considerable
time educating the developer team on these requirements.  We met on several
with the Peruvian Minister of Energy and had  him meet with OPIC, IDB and the
World Bank to better understand the impact of environmental issues on
financing.
  Bulacan Biomass project, Philippines - We are working with the project team
to obtain political risk insurance for the project through OPIC or MIGA.
  LNG project, Venezuela:  We are working with the finance team exploring
OPIC, IFC, IDB financing for this project.
  Pipavov power project, India - Working with the project team regarding
OPIC, IFC financing for the project
  Subsea fiber laying project, Caribbean:  We have undertaken discussions
with financing and other institutions re sub-sea fiber laying jproject,
including addressing licensing requirements of the FCC for international
telecom projects.
  SIEPAC - We have had meetings with the project team on the status of this
Central American electricity transmission project and how we might get
involved.
  Puerto Suarez - We have been working with the project team to address
environmental issues relating to the transmission line that is in the
Pantanel in preparation for OPIC or IDB financing.
  Cuiaba II - We have been working with the team to develop a strategy to
address the siting of compression stations so that the environmentalists will
not create major problems.  This is a problem for both Phase I and II.
  EES Projects in Southern Cone and Eastern Europe - We have met with the
IDB, IFC and OPIC and have arrived at an agreed upon financing strucure which
now awaits EES projects in these regions.

 In the past six months we have also been involved in supporting our existing
asset base on a variety of issues before these institutions as well as to
agencies of the USG:
  Dominican Republic - Have been working with the DR team to broaden pressure
on the government regarding our payment problems, including the IFC and World
Bank, the IDB and the USG, especially State, Treasury and DOE.
  Trakya, Turkey -   We have been working with the asset team to mobilize USG
support through OPIC, EXIM, state and Treasury to address payment problems.
the USG is now aggressively supporting Enron in our effort to get these
issues under control.  We are also in discussion with OPIC and EXIM about the
prospective selldown of our equity interest in Trakya, as we are for Cuiaba
and Dabhol.

 In the past six months we have also been involved in a range of other issues
of importance to the company:
  Transfer issues:  I have developed a strategy as to how to approach OPIC,
EXIM, MIGA and the other financing institutions in the event there is a
transfer situation. We are now awaiting whether it will be needed.
  OPIC in Mexico:  As part of our overarching relationship with OPIC we have
agreed to spearhead an initiastive to assist OIPIC develop a program in
Mexico.  that effort has been very well received by OPIC and George Munoz and
is ongoing.
  EXIM Relationship:  As part of our effort to establish a relationship with
EXIM and Chairman Jim Harmon we agreed to spearhead the analysis of the
market windows issue.  the effort has been very well received; Joe Sutton is
now on the EXIM Advisory Board and Enron will be on the commission
considering EXIM's future.  Harmon and EXIM have been very complimentary of
Enron's initiative in this regard.
  Environmental Issues:  I am working with Kelly Kimberly and her team, and
with the Southern Cone to better address our environmental needs in that
region and throughout the emerging markets.

EES financing

Liberalization efforts - SCone, Petrobras

OPIC - efforts in Mexico


I wasn't sure if you got my response to your email.


THANKS ANDY.

BETH

-----Original Message-----
From: Zipper, Andy [mailto:Andy.Zipper@enron.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:31 AM
To: beth@angelflightsc.org
Subject: RE: completed mission sheet ???

700 NM, 4 hrs total


Good afternoon,

Please submit an eRequest for the access request (all 5-7 people can be
placed on one request).

To view the Group members, please open the ECT Address book, click on Groups,
then double-click on the name of the group.  Please let us know if there are
any questions.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 02/27/2001 11:31 AM
To: Enron Messaging Security/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: eRequests 20721 & 20740

ECT HOU_LN1/ECT
Legal\new_swp.nsf

I will be having about 5-7 other people that I will need added to this
database.  Should I send these requests back directly to you, or do them
through the system as well?

Also, there are two ways of getting edit access through this database.  One
is for employees of Legal, who can then enter Legal comments, and the other
is for employees of Credit, who can then enter Credit comments.  Do you see
that choice?  Is there some way for me to verify which employees of Legal and
which employees of Credit have what access?  I know that some employees of
Credit have Legal access by mistake.  Can I get lists of the Legal and Credit
breakdowns?

	Enron Messaging Security@ENRON
	02/27/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: eRequests 20721 & 20740

Good morning,

Please provide the path to the Financial Trading Agreement database.  The
information can be found by right-clicking on the database icon, then
selecting Database properties.  The Server and File name will be under the
Basic tab.

Have a nice day,
Gary Sta. Maria
Enron Messaging Security


Peggy/Stacey:

What is the status of this letter?

Thanks,

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 08/29/2001 07:54 AM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/06/2001 03:00 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

I'm sending down a copy of the letters.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Mahoney, Peggy
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Bolton, Stacey; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

Thanks, Peggy...MLC

Peggy Mahoney
08/06/2001 01:16 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I just talked to Stacey and I think we'll send a letter discussing the fact that the funds have
run out, etc.  I'll be back to you with a draft.
Thanks
Peggy

Marianne Castano
08/02/2001 12:05 PM
To:	Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

This is in regard to discontinuation of the Biz Mix product -- as you can see from the messages from Stacey below, we have stopped offering the product because the energy credit funds have been depleted.  I'm still going to ask Richard Ring (He's on vacation)  on Monday your question -- ie, is there any way we can continue with it, notwithstanding.   I fear he is going to say its possible to do so, but at an extreme loss of $$$....MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 01:01 PM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 12:00 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

You're welcome.  Hope I see you on Monday.  My understanding is that surprisingly some of the money that we've already submitted has been paid due (despite the fund being depleted) to overpayment/accounting issues with other entities.  This also has to do w/ the time lapse between filing for reimbursement for 3 months prior (i.e. I don't think Richard anticipated getting paid for some of January's purchases because technically the fund ran out in December).  There is definitely not enough money to continue buying going forward in the C&I fund.  It might be replenished next January provided direct access goes through.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Thanks, Stacey.  I hope all's well.  I'm going to get with him on Monday (I'll be in Houston) -- I seem to recall his mentioning that one particular fund is not 100% depleted, and that technically, we could continue to offer the product.  Do you remember his noting this?  MLC

From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 11:30 AM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Richard is on vacation until Monday.  To continue the Bizmix product, we would need the customer credit monies.  The customer credit monies for the Bizmix were depleted in January.  Perhaps Richard can work a deal for tags, but I still think this would be a premium and affect their positions in CA.  I'm sure Richard will give you more detail, but wanted to make sure you were aware of the situation w/ the incentive funds.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Peggy informed me on Monday that she did not want to send any notice letters to customers advising of the discontinuation of bixmiz, and asked if we could somehow, someway, continue to offer the product going forward.  I have a message into Richard re:  Peggy's message to me...MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/01/2001 05:21 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Michael Terraso/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

My suggestions are below.  Thanks Heather for the helpful update.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:30 PM
To:	Bolton, Stacey; Ring, Richard; Castano, Marianne
Subject:	CA BIZMIX Issues

Hello all!

I met with Diann Huddleson today and she clarified some issues for me regarding the DASRing of customers in California.  Unfortunately it wasn't what we wanted to hear.

On the easy side of things, all residential customers (PGE, SCE, SDG&E) were turned back to the utilities starting May 30th (DASRs were submitted and they are cycling off now depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.)  These customers received a letter letting them know about it.

On the commercial side of things (Diann had no distinctions between small commercial & large commercial & industrial customers), SDG&E customers have been ours all along and have never been DASRed and reDASRed.  In PGE & SCE, IBM behind PGE was also never put through the DASR process and has continuously received our product.  All other PGE & SCE customers were originally submitted for DASRing back to the utilities on - January 31!!!!!  That provides enough issues of its own, but I'll get to that.  PGE did a virtual switch so as of Jan 31 all these customers became PGE's again, but with SCE, when a customer was switched depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.  All de-DASRed customers were then re-DASRed back to us starting June 21, and Diann indicated that not only all of our old customers were re-DASRed, but new contracts were being executed and these new customers were also being DASRed to us.  No communication about all of this has been sent to the customers, but as we discussed, some personal basis notice may have been given to our larger customers through the reps.

So - I'm not worried about the residential side - we'll have to send them an annual historical label next April (with perhaps a letter explaining why they're still receiving info from us).  As far as the commercial/industrial .......

1.  No notice was provided to probably the majority of the customers. [Bolton, Stacey]  We (or PR) should prepare a customer letter as discussed with Peggy, notifying them that they are no longer receiving Bizmix ASAP.
2.  They've been receiving system mix since Feb 1 and we've been proceeding as if it were actually BIZMIX - i.e. the 2nd quarter labels they just received indicated BIZMIX, as appropriate to the customer. [Bolton, Stacey]   We should look into purchasing green tags to make these customers whole if we will be more than 5% off of our projection v. what we actually delivered.  The regs allow for discrepancies between projections and actual, and you don't have to show an extra column w/ the difference if you are w/in 5% delta band between projection and actual..  We can change the projection for third quarter and include this information in the customer letter.
3.  What are the new customers (those as being DASRed to us the first time as of June 21) being told they are receiving?  Are they being marketed BIZMIX? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should ensure this is not the case with origination.  Someone in Jeremy B.'s shop will most likely know.
4.  As far as dates are concerned for reporting purposes, will we just use those given as the date of submission (i.e. Jan 31, May 30, June 21) as it is impossible to pinpoint when each individual customer transferred? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should discuss this a bit.  I'm not sure that this will really matter at the end of the day.  The CEC has instructed us all along to send labels to the customers, which we have.  We'll report the purchases (brown and green) as normal at the end of the year.

Let me know your input.

Heather

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 09:24
AM ---------------------------

Patrick Smith <PatrickAlan@compuserve.com> on 12/15/99 09:08:04 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Model

 - 121599.exe


Ben,

Thanks for the briefing.  We have your file here and I will add this
information so we have a complete "story".  Good luck with the GMAT and
keep in contact.

Jennifer
-----------------------------------------------------

Jennifer Miller
Interim Director of Admissions, MBA program
McCombs School of Business
University of Texas at Austin

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Jennifer Miller
Subject: Re: FW:

Jennifer:
     Thank you for the response and the update.  The news that Dr,
Harris
had left was news to me, since I had not received an auto-reply message.
Just to let you know, Dr Harris and I had talked quite a bit last year
about my application status.  I had also talked to many of the Finance
Professors, particularly Professor Sheridan Titman about the program and
my
application status.  Both Professor Titman and Dr Harris suggested that
I
take a finance class as well as retake the GMAT.  Due to my documented
learning disability, I am trying to receive a "special testing status"
from
GMAC and then re-take the GMAT.
     I hope this brief "download" of my previous conversations with Dr.
Harris and others at the Business School has helped.   I hope all is
going
well with the new school year and I look forward to hearing from you in
the
near future.

Regards,

Ben Rogers


Jeff - Thank you for the comprehensive coverage.

I know you have a lot going on, with many to communicate with / to.  If you
could, please add Jeff Messina/HOU/EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES, to your distribution lists.

Thank you again - Dan

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/27/2000 08:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES,
Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika
Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update--Day 1 of California PUC Hearings

Thanks Roger.  Here are the highlights of today's hearings:

 Common themes--many tracked ours pretty closely
Not a question of whether rates need to rise, but by how much.
Though some oppose any and all rate increases, the lion's share acknowledged
that the utilities have a cash flow problem and the a rate increase is
necessary.
Due process matters.
If the Commission is thinking about going as far as ending rate freezes and
increasing rates, it better provide for ample due process, or countless law
suits will ensue.
Don't jump the gun.
A rate increase is likely, but only the utilities benefit from adoption of
the utilities' proposals. The Commission needs to carefully scrutinize the
utilities' claims and take a careful look at the level of increase required
to maintain access to capital markets.  However, as expected, the utilities
implored the Commission to jump the gun immediately.  The utilities want the
Commission to declare an end to the rate freeze and raise rates on Jan.4.
No more divestiture.
The utility should keep the generating assets it retained, but the Commission
should ensure that the assets' benefits are allocated equally among all
customers.  One legislator recommended that the State buy the utilities'
hydro assets, which would give the utilities the cash they need and give the
state control over some generation.
Treat all customers equally and fairly.
The Commission should not create two classes of customers (e.g., large v.
small; direct access v. bundled).  No customer group should be sacrificied to
save another.
Be as narrow as possible/do as little harm as possible
The immediate problem is the utility's cash/credit crunch.  As such, the
Commission should do only enough to solve this very specific, immediate
problem.  A modest rate increase is all that's required and the Commission
should do no more.

At the beginning and the end of the hearing, the President of the Commission
asked parties to be prepared (at tomorrow's hearing) to discuss whether the
Commission could legally use its other, broad powers to raise rates without
declaring an end to the rate freeze.  It seems that she seems some benefit in
raising rates, but leaving AB 1890 otherwise intact untill the Commission can

Marketers and generators are to blame for the problem
Though not universally embraced, the theme came up repeatedly.

A few parties (e.g., the Unions, low income consumer groups, one PUC
commissioner) called for complete re-regulation of the industry, returning
the utilities to vertically integrated monopolies.  But they were the
exception rather than the rule at today's hearing.

2. Next steps
There hearings were scheduled to end on Thursay, but now will continue
through Friday.
Tomorrow, lawyers will provide "oral" arguments on whether the Commission
must end the rate freeze in order to increase rates.  We will argue that it
does not have to, and should not, go through the complex and controversial
exercise of determing whether the rate freeze is over between now and
01.04.01.  We will argue that the Commission has the authority to raise rates
without ending the rate freeze, and if it decides to raise rates, it should
do so while keeping AB 1890's basic structure in place until a full and fair
hearing of the issues is completed.   We are talking to other stakeholders to
persuade them to take the same approach.  In terms of legal arguments, this
is clearly a long shot, but one that seems worth taking.
After the oral argument, the utilities will present their rate proposals and
"all interested persons" will have the opportunity to cross-examine the
utilities (in short, tomorrow will also be a zoo).
When asked what the process will be for issuing a proposed decision and
providing comments, the President of the Commission responded "we don't know,
it's evolving."  In other words, the Commission is doing a poor job of
ensuring that their Jan 4 decision is "appeal-proof."
Keep in mind that the situation remains extremely fluid and the trend is
still toward ending the rate freeze on Jan. 4th.  We continue to aggressively
offer alternatives to that possibility and continue to try to bring other
stakeholders to our side.
We're doing everything necessary to preserve our appeal rights.

We can discuss further on the 10 AM (CST) call tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

	Roger Yang@EES
	12/27/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora
Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group
EB2868

Got an update from Jeff Dasovich.  No earth shattering news.  Comments have
been all over the place.  The impression is being made by differing parties
that the issues are very complex and would inevitably result in endless
lawsuits.  Possible conclusion by the CPUC may be to invoke emergency powers
to implement an emergency surcharge and avoid addressing the issue of when
the rate freeze ends in these hearings.  However, this is just speculation.
Jeff will return to the office by 5:00 pm PST and will send out a summary of
today's hearings.

Roger

Leticia Botello
12/27/2000 06:57 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group EB2868

12/27/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


Sounds good to me. I'll give you a call Monday morning
then.

DJ

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com


i didn't get thrown out of a casino.  i had to leave this bar b/c they over charged us by $300 so i argued w/ the manager and he said i had to leave.  i was pissed, but i didn't get physically removed or anything.  these guys at this club tried to rip us off and i was pissed.   i didn't out do my birthday either.  we drank a lot but it was over long periods of time.  it wasn't like on my birthday when we just slammed everything as fast as we could.


fyi- this sound familiar? rick
-----Original Message-----
From: McMahon, Jeffrey
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:00 PM
To: Buy, Rick
Subject: FW: Credit charge for Balli-Klockner transaction

I need to discuss this deal with you...it is essentially a physical option to supply steel to a very large service center with locations in the US and in Europe.  The challenge for you guys will be that it will require a $30mil option payment to them.  Very good deal without credit issues...pls call me when you have a chance.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Sue on behalf of McMahon, Jeffrey
Sent: Wed 10/10/2001 2:23 PM
To: McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc:
Subject: FW: Credit charge for Balli-Klockner transaction

-----------------_________________________________________________

Sue Ford - Executive Assistant

Enron Industrial Market - Office of the Chairman

Tel: 713-853-5176

Fax: 713-646-5930

sue.ford@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Garner, Bruce

Sent:   Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:29 AM

To:     McMahon, Jeffrey

Subject:        FW: Credit charge for Balli-Klockner transaction

fyi

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Maley, Paul

Sent:   10 October 2001 17:28

To:     Cose, Simon; Murphy, Ted

Cc:     Garner, Bruce; Bokeloh, Frank; Herbelot, Olivier; Pearce, Christian; Amiry, Homan; Patel, Nish

Subject:        RE: Credit charge for Balli-Klockner transaction

Simon

I have run an indicative credit reserve which comes out at $15m.

It should be made clear at this stage the number is only indicative and subject to further change and discussion.  Forward price curves and volatilities will need to be confirmed, as will the option structure.

We still want to achieve the best possible contractual terms through pursuing collateral rights and should consider other risk-mitigating options such as bankruptcy protection.  The tenor and $ exposure would warrant sign-off at a very senior level, and will obviously be covered by the DASH approval.

The deal is clearly of great value to Enron, but we should question the motives of Balli in wanting or needing to do this.  How much do we know about their exisiting banking relationships and ability to access funding at present?

I'm sure we will discuss further.

Paul

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Cose, Simon

Sent:   09 October 2001 19:51

To:     Murphy, Ted

Cc:     Garner, Bruce; Bokeloh, Frank; Maley, Paul

Subject:        Credit charge for Balli-Klockner transaction

Ted

Bruce Garner has asked me to bring you into a trade we're looking at with Balli-Klockner (BK). Ken Curry was asked to evaluate a related proposal a week back but is now on holiday and Rebecca Phillips was not brought up to speed. This latest proposal would be a European trade and the client is under time constraints and keen to move fast.

The transaction is as follows:

Enron has the right to sell to BK physical Hot Rolled Coil steel at Index (CRU HRC) + 7.5%

Start:  Jan2002

End:    Dec2016

Tonnage:        500 000 Metric Tonnes per annum (total tonnage: 7.5 million MT)

Enron pays a premium of 30 million USD upon contracting.

The CRU Index is Enron's benchmark steel index and physical steel trades at Index flat. There is thus 7.5% intrinsic value in the puts which translates to approx. $75 million USD in present value terms ($45million net of premium).

Our counterparty would be the parent of the soon to be combined Balli Klockner PLC and the various Balli service centres soon to be merged (BK Holdings Ltd UK). BK are not offering us additional credit relief, ie. bank guarantees, LC's, insurance bonds, etc. Your help in establishing our appetite and an appropriate credit charge for this transaction would be much appreciated.

Many thanks

Simon Cose

#32628


Daily Note Newsletter
------------------------------

================ Sponsored by TWST.com =====================================

Healthcare Investor?

Come to our free Cell & Stem Cell Therapies Virtual Conference at
http://www.twst.com/register/stemconf.html

=============================================================================

Following are the latest interviews from the the Industry/Services Sector published by The Wall Street Transcript.

______________
Services

  Chairman of Constellation assesses HR consulting space and outlines opportunities for consolidation
  http://archive.twst.com/notes/articles/lrs037.html

  CEO of Rent-A-Center comments on acquisitions
  http://archive.twst.com/notes/articles/paa206.html

  MD of jobpilot/Intellicruit discusses the strategy behind one of the leading e-Recruitment companies
  http://archive.twst.com/notes/articles/lrs036.html

  CEO discusses on the competitive environment for Student Advantage
  http://archive.twst.com/notes/articles/naz233.html

  CEO discusses coming milestones for Scientific Learning
  http://archive.twst.com/notes/articles/naz257.html

To see more about The Wall Street Transcript, go to the website at http://www.twst.com  Access to interview extracts is free, and access to the full text of any of the articles listed above requires a subscription to that sector.

For FULL-TEXT SUBSCRIPTION

    go to http://www.twst.com/subscribe.html

The Wall Street Transcript is a premier weekly investment publication serving serious long-term investors for over 35 years. The Transcript publishes industry roundtables and interviews with Wall Street analysts,  money managers, and company CEOs, and is read by top money managers, brokers, and individual investors.The Wall Street Transcript is independent and impartial and neither invests in, nor recommends, stocks. Investors should always conduct their own research before investing.

To UNSUBSCRIBE
go to http://www.twst.com/unsubscribe.html
________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000, Wall Street Transcript Corp.


John,

Howdy from Houston.  I received a call from a guy named Steve Scott who is
involved with several ventures including a German VC  called eStreet.  Are
you aware of these guys?  They want to talk to someone about e-opportunties
in Europe especially Spain.  I will ask  him to call you once I talk with him
but I don't have your number in London.  Two questions, what is your  phone
number in London (the phone book has you in Germany) and do you know these
guys?

Thanks,
Mike


Jim and Margaret:

Attached you will find the latest version of the transition document.  It
incoprporates most of the suggestions you made as well as the agreements we
camr to on my last visit to HOU.

Margaret,  as you will see I need you help with a couple of pages.

Jim, I need you to help me get some people to participate in the Addressing
Specific Issues chapter.

I hope you find it useful.

Best,

Ricardo


I am very happy for you.  It sounds as if everything in your life is going in
the right direction.  I think you will enjoy working in the DC ofice and for
Joe.  I am sure you will learn alt.  Also, thank you for remembering Jason
and Jessica's 1 year birthday.  The designer T-shirts were great and they
look really cute in them.  That was very thoughful of you to remember.  Good
luck!

From: Karina Prizont/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 02:10 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject:

Stan,

As you probably know, I have accepted a position as Regulatory Analyst
reporting to Joe Hartsoe.  My last day in Houston is June 29 and I will start
my new responsibilities on July 16.

By means of this message I want to thank you for making this possible.  This
is a big challenge for me and opens a new spectrum of possibilities in a
completely different arena.

I am looking forward to being a part of the ETS team.

Thanks again,

Karina


----- Forwarded by Brian Hendon/Enron Communications on 11/06/00 05:58 PM
-----

	Tom Huntington
	11/06/00 05:41 PM

		 To: Lex Carroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Peter
Heintzelman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
rob_mcdonald@enron.net, Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Reinfeld/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John McPherson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Brian Hendon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robert Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jay Hawthorn/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Richard Schneider/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Bryan Garrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Grant
Zimmerman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, squishy@hotmail.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Chili

>From: "Evan Betzer" <evan_betzer@hotmail.com>
>To: tomhuntington@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: Texas
>Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 13:50:32 CST
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Keith" <keithstepp@hotmail.com>
>>To: "Merry Mathes" <merrym@burlen.com>, "Sarah Clark" <sasahck@yahoo.com>,
>>"Evan" <evan_betzer@hotmail.com>, "Jeff" <kennedy_jeffrey@hotmail.com>,
>>"Yan" <tigerbalm_9999@yahoo.com>, "Steve Miao" <zmiao@hotmail.com>, "CB"
>><cbheng@yahoo.com>, "Mickey Mericle" <bassetpal1@aol.com>
>>Subject: Texas
>>Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:09:07 +0800
>>
>>Too funny not to share....
>>
>>
>> >>INEXPERIENCED CHILI TASTER
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>These are notes from an inexperienced chili taster named FRANK, who was
>>
>> >>visiting Texas from New Jersey and fell into it:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>"Recently I was lucky enough to be the 10,000th attendee at the State
>>
>> >>Fair in Texas, and was asked to fill in to be a judge
>>
>> >>at a chili cook-off. Apparently the original judge #3 called in sick at
>>
>> >>the last moment, and I happened to be standing
>>
>> >>there when the call came in. I was assured by the other two judges
>>
>> >>(Native Texans) that it would be a fun event and a true
>>
>> >>taste of Texas hospitality. They assured me that the chili wouldn't be
>>
>> >>all that spicy, and besides they told me I could
>>
>> >>have free beer during the tasting, so I accepted. Here are the
>>
>> >>scorecards from the event:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Chili # 1: Mike's Maniac Mobster Monster Chili
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: A little too heavy on tomato. Amusing kick.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: Nice, smooth tomato flavor. Very mild.
>>
>> >>FRANK: Holy shit, what the hell is this stuff? You could remove dried
>>
>> >>paint from your driveway with it. Took me two beers
>>
>> >>to put the flames out. Hope that's the worst one. These Texans are
>>
>> >>crazy.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Chili # 2: Arthur's Afterburner Chili
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: Smoky, with a hint of pork. Slight Jalapeno tang.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: Exciting BBQ flavor, needs more peppers to be taken
>>
>> >>seriously.
>>
>> >>FRANK: Keep this out of reach of children! I'm not sure what I am
>>
>> >>supposed to taste besides pain. I had to wave off two
>>
>> >>people who wanted to give me the Heimlich maneuver. They had to
>>
>> >>walkie-talkie in 3 extra beers when they saw the look on my face.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Chili # 3: Fred's Famous Burn Down the Barn Chili
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: Excellent firehouse chili! Great kick. Needs more beans.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: A beanless chili, a bit salty, good use of red peppers.
>>
>> >>FRANK: Call the EPA, I've located a uranium spill. My nose feels like I
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>have been snorting Drano. Everyone knows the
>>
>> >>routine by now. Barmaid pounded me on the back; now my backbone is in
>>
>> >>the front part of my chest. 'm getting shit-faced.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Chili # 4: Bubba's Black Magic
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: Black bean chili with almost no spice. Disappointing.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: Hint of lime in the black beans. Good side dish for fish or
>>
>> >>other mild foods, not much of a chili.
>>
>> >>FRANK: I felt something scraping across my tongue, but was unable to
>>
>> >>taste it. Sally, the bar maid, was standing behind me
>>
>> >>with fresh refills; that 300 lb. bitch is starting to look HOT, just
>>
>> >>like this nuclear-waste I'm eating.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Chili # 5: Linda's Legal Lip Remover
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: Meaty, strong chili. Cayenne peppers freshly ground, adding
>>
>> >>considerable kick. Very impressive.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: Chili using shredded beef; could use more tomato. Must admit
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>the cayenne peppers make a strong statement.
>>
>> >>FRANK: My ears are ringing, and I can no longer focus my eyes. I farted
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>and four people behind me needed paramedics. The
>>
>> >>contestant seemed offended when I told her that her chili had given me
>>
>> >>brain damage. Sally saved my tongue from bleeding
>>
>> >>by pouring beer directly on it from a pitcher. It really pisses me off
>>
>> >>that the other judges asked me to stop screaming.
>>
>> >>Screw those rednecks!
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Chili # 6: Vera's Very Vegetarian Variety
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: Thin yet bold vegetarian variety chili. Good balance of
>>
>> >>spice and peppers.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: The best yet. Aggressive use of peppers, onions, and garlic.
>>
>> >>Superb.
>>
>> >>FRANK: My intestines are now a straight pipe filled with gaseous,
>>
>> >>sulfuric flames. No one seems inclined to stand behind me
>>
>> >>except that slut Sally. I need to wipe my ass with a snow cone!
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Chili # 7: Susan's Screaming Sensation Chili
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: A mediocre chili with too much reliance on canned peppers.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: Ho Hum, tastes as if the chef literally threw in a can of
>>
>> >>chili peppers at the last moment. I should note that I
>>
>> >>am worried about Judge Number 3. He appears to be in a bit of distress
>>
>> >>as he is cursing uncontrollably.
>>
>> >>FRANK: You could put a grenade in my mouth, pull the pin, and I
>>wouldn't
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>feel a damn thing. I've lost the sight in one eye,
>>
>> >>and the world sounds like it is made of rushing water. My shirt is
>>
>> >>covered with chili which slid unnoticed out of my mouth.
>>
>> >>My pants are full of lava-like shit to match my damn shirt. At least
>>
>> >>during the autopsy they'll know what killed me. I've
>>
>> >>decided to stop breathing, it's too painful. Screw it, I'm not getting
>>
>> >>any oxygen anyway. If I need air, I'll just suck
>>
>> >>it in through the 4inch hole in my stomach.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> Chili # 8: Helen's Mount Saint Chili
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>JUDGE ONE: A perfect ending, this is a nice blend chili, safe for all,
>>
>> >>not too bold but spicy enough to declare its existence.
>>
>> >>JUDGE TWO: This final entry is a good, balanced chili, neither mild nor
>>
>> >>hot. Sorry to see that most of it was lost when
>>
>> >>Judge Number 3 passed out, fell and pulled the chili pot on top of
>>
>> >>himself. Not sure if he's going to make it. Poor Yank.
>>
>> >>FRANK: --------------(editor's note: Judge #3 was unable To report)
>>
>> >>
>>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Peggy:

Let me know if you did not receive the copies of the bizmix letters I sent down to you?

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Mahoney, Peggy; Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Castano, Marianne; Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

Peggy/Stacey:

What is the status of this letter?

Thanks,

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 08/29/2001 07:54 AM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/06/2001 03:00 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

I'm sending down a copy of the letters.

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 2:59 PM
To:	Mahoney, Peggy
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Bolton, Stacey; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

Thanks, Peggy...MLC

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Peggy Mahoney
08/06/2001 01:16 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

I just talked to Stacey and I think we'll send a letter discussing the fact that the funds have
run out, etc.  I'll be back to you with a draft.
Thanks
Peggy

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Marianne Castano
08/02/2001 12:05 PM
To:	Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  	 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>

This is in regard to discontinuation of the Biz Mix product -- as you can see from the messages from Stacey below, we have stopped offering the product because the energy credit funds have been depleted.  I'm still going to ask Richard Ring (He's on vacation)  on Monday your question -- ie, is there any way we can continue with it, notwithstanding.   I fear he is going to say its possible to do so, but at an extreme loss of $$$....MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 01:01 PM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 12:00 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

You're welcome.  Hope I see you on Monday.  My understanding is that surprisingly some of the money that we've already submitted has been paid due (despite the fund being depleted) to overpayment/accounting issues with other entities.  This also has to do w/ the time lapse between filing for reimbursement for 3 months prior (i.e. I don't think Richard anticipated getting paid for some of January's purchases because technically the fund ran out in December).  There is definitely not enough money to continue buying going forward in the C&I fund.  It might be replenished next January provided direct access goes through.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Thanks, Stacey.  I hope all's well.  I'm going to get with him on Monday (I'll be in Houston) -- I seem to recall his mentioning that one particular fund is not 100% depleted, and that technically, we could continue to offer the product.  Do you remember his noting this?  MLC

From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 11:30 AM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Richard is on vacation until Monday.  To continue the Bizmix product, we would need the customer credit monies.  The customer credit monies for the Bizmix were depleted in January.  Perhaps Richard can work a deal for tags, but I still think this would be a premium and affect their positions in CA.  I'm sure Richard will give you more detail, but wanted to make sure you were aware of the situation w/ the incentive funds.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Castano, Marianne
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:52 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

Peggy informed me on Monday that she did not want to send any notice letters to customers advising of the discontinuation of bixmiz, and asked if we could somehow, someway, continue to offer the product going forward.  I have a message into Richard re:  Peggy's message to me...MLC

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 09:47 AM ---------------------------
From:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/01/2001 05:21 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Michael Terraso/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	RE: CA BIZMIX Issues

My suggestions are below.  Thanks Heather for the helpful update.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:30 PM
To:	Bolton, Stacey; Ring, Richard; Castano, Marianne
Subject:	CA BIZMIX Issues

Hello all!

I met with Diann Huddleson today and she clarified some issues for me regarding the DASRing of customers in California.  Unfortunately it wasn't what we wanted to hear.

On the easy side of things, all residential customers (PGE, SCE, SDG&E) were turned back to the utilities starting May 30th (DASRs were submitted and they are cycling off now depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.)  These customers received a letter letting them know about it.

On the commercial side of things (Diann had no distinctions between small commercial & large commercial & industrial customers), SDG&E customers have been ours all along and have never been DASRed and reDASRed.  In PGE & SCE, IBM behind PGE was also never put through the DASR process and has continuously received our product.  All other PGE & SCE customers were originally submitted for DASRing back to the utilities on - January 31!!!!!  That provides enough issues of its own, but I'll get to that.  PGE did a virtual switch so as of Jan 31 all these customers became PGE's again, but with SCE, when a customer was switched depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.  All de-DASRed customers were then re-DASRed back to us starting June 21, and Diann indicated that not only all of our old customers were re-DASRed, but new contracts were being executed and these new customers were also being DASRed to us.  No communication about all of this has been sent to the customers, but as we discussed, some personal basis notice may have been given to our larger customers through the reps.

So - I'm not worried about the residential side - we'll have to send them an annual historical label next April (with perhaps a letter explaining why they're still receiving info from us).  As far as the commercial/industrial .......

1.  No notice was provided to probably the majority of the customers. [Bolton, Stacey]  We (or PR) should prepare a customer letter as discussed with Peggy, notifying them that they are no longer receiving Bizmix ASAP.
2.  They've been receiving system mix since Feb 1 and we've been proceeding as if it were actually BIZMIX - i.e. the 2nd quarter labels they just received indicated BIZMIX, as appropriate to the customer. [Bolton, Stacey]   We should look into purchasing green tags to make these customers whole if we will be more than 5% off of our projection v. what we actually delivered.  The regs allow for discrepancies between projections and actual, and you don't have to show an extra column w/ the difference if you are w/in 5% delta band between projection and actual..  We can change the projection for third quarter and include this information in the customer letter.
3.  What are the new customers (those as being DASRed to us the first time as of June 21) being told they are receiving?  Are they being marketed BIZMIX? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should ensure this is not the case with origination.  Someone in Jeremy B.'s shop will most likely know.
4.  As far as dates are concerned for reporting purposes, will we just use those given as the date of submission (i.e. Jan 31, May 30, June 21) as it is impossible to pinpoint when each individual customer transferred? [Bolton, Stacey]   We should discuss this a bit.  I'm not sure that this will really matter at the end of the day.  The CEC has instructed us all along to send labels to the customers, which we have.  We'll report the purchases (brown and green) as normal at the end of the year.

Let me know your input.

Heather


Jeff

Delainey is recruiting everybody.  It will be very hard to meet the employee criteria set out by Umbrulla if this continues.  As you see below, he is even recruiting traders.  It's hard enough with the external companies.

John
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:48 PM
To:	Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

Delainey is everywhere.

He is working on Doug Gilbert Smith - Head of Ercot Power Trading.


OK for me!

	Lisa Lees
	11/14/2000 02:41 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap - 2nd request

Tana/Karen:

The product long description below will fall under the new product type Mixed
Xylene Fin Swap.  Tom Moran has approved copying the profiles for the new
product type from the following:

 US Benzene Financial Swap CMAI Spot

Please respond no later than 10 a.m. on Wednesday, November 15.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 01:30 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/13/2000 10:04 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap - 2nd request

Mark,

Please approve the attahced product.

Thanks,
---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 10:03
AM ---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  11/09/2000 09:29 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mixed Xylene Fin Swap

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

Traders: Steve Elliott, Lee Jackson, Adam Metry

US MxXylene Swap  CMAI Spot               Aug-Oct00       USD/Gl-b

A US Mixed Xylene financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by the Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the Term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period;
provided that, if the Term of the Transaction is less than one calendar month
the Determination Period shall be the Term of the Transaction.  The Notional
Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty via the website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable.  The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.

The Term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Aug 2000
to the Termination Date of 31 Oct 2000.

The Index for a Determination Period shall be the mean of the average of the
high and low price in Cents/Gallons of Mixed Xylene published under the
headings &Prices for Period Ending [DATE]: United States: Mixed Xylene)8
under the caption &SPOT: Cents/Lb.8 in each issue of Chemical Market
Associates, Inc.,s Aromatics Market Report (Weekly) that reports prices
effective for such Determination Period. Notwithstanding the reference to
pounds in the caption mentioned above, the prices quoted for this product by
CMAI are in Cents/Gallon.

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.

The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be gallons and
the volume shown shall be in total number of Barrels (42 US Gallons) per
month.

==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986


Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. Please
notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You should not
copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any
person.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Dear Justin,

As discussed, please find attached our paper providing answers to the
additional 5 questions on LME contract marketing posed by your e-mail of 25
September.

If you have any other questions, please contact me.

We will now proceed to complete our comments on your initial inquiries as
indicated in the conclusion of our 19 September paper.

All the best,

Ned

------------------------------------------------------------
Simmons & Simmons
21 Wilson Street
London
EC2M 2TX

Tel +44 (0)20 7628 2020
Fax +44 (0)20 7628 2070
DX  12 London/Chancery Ln

An international law firm
London Paris Brussels Lisbon Milan Rome Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Shanghai New York

A list of partners at each office can be provided on request.

www.simmons-simmons.com

www.elexica.com is the award winning interactive online legal resource by
lawyers for lawyers, powered by content from Simmons & Simmons.

 - 65; 6787EA - Enron Metals Part 30 Memo C.doc


2 side letters have been signed by Mark and should be on their way to you
from Travis (I was out Mon so Travis forwarded).  Call me or Travis if you or
Mike don't get them.  On new letter I will try to get draft out this week or
early next.
eas


I sent this along to Molly, because, while I hate to admit it, I think she
might be better suited to such a daunting task.

K

Anna Symes <annasymes@yahoo.com> on 04/11/2001 09:54:14 AM
To: "Kate.Symes@enron.com" <Kate.Symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: I thought you might be interested...

  To: Kate.Symes@enron.com
From: Anna Symes

I thought you might be interested in this job.  It's just one of the
more than 250,000 great jobs on Headhunter.net:

  http://www.headhunter.net/share/det.asp?d=J26K66D0YJBB4DWPWJ

Comments:


Joe,

Here's a possibility.  Let me know what you think.

Dear Clayton,

Thanks for your note about our new television ad.  Our goal with the ad
campaign is to increase Enron's familiarity and favorability with business
and government opinion leaders.  We want to do that by communicating the
innovative culture at Enron that always asks the question, "Why?"  When we
heard businesses blaming poor financial performance on their inability to
manage weather risks, we asked, "Why?"  We answered that with our weather
derivatives product that helps companies protect revenues from unfavorable
weather.  Now, many equity analysts and other investors are challenging
companies that don't use weather derivatives as a risk management tool.

In order to get our message across in a cluttered advertising environment, we
need to create compelling images to get that message accross.  The use of a
traditional symbol (the old cork gun shooting gallery) applied in a
non-traditional way (shooting down conventional wisdom) gets the point across
very directly that traditional excuses don't "stand up" to today's markets.
I think it's a powerful, and humorous, symbolic message.

I'm sorry if you're taking the reference to an old-fashioned game literally.
I can assure you that no ducks or CEOs were harmed in the making of the
commercial.

Sincerely,

Joe Sutton

(Obviously, you can delete the smart-alecky last sentence.)


Luiz --

I don't think that I'll send this given the current direction of the PUC to move forward with TX.  I do think that these points are important and maybe Jean R. can get them in verbally as appropriate.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maurer, Luiz
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Draft Letter to Texas PUC

Jim

As requested. Please review.

 << File: letter.doc >>


FYI

Anne Koehler is out of the office today and will return Tuesday, January
16th.  She will be checking voice mail.

Carolyn George
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith, EB3836A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-3439    Fax:  (713) 646-3393
email:  carolyn.george@enron.com


Hey darlin'.  Long time, no see.  How are ya?  What's the price per magnum?
How many am I allowed to get?  And what are the dates for Mazatlan?  Hope to
see you guys soon.

Best,
Jeff


CES needs 17dts/day of Mountaineer gas for the rest of March.  The request
was made by Kim Novesak??

I will be out this afternoon.  Please call Brian Perrone (703-561-6486) or
Scott Goodell at 713-853-7711.

Thanks


I was wondering what I was going to do in my spare time!

From: Carlos Sole on 03/27/2001 08:04 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Great News

Just what I wanted to hear, I think I'm ready to go meet Kendall and start
driving over railroad tracks


[IMAGE]
     You are receiving this message as a valued member of the itsImazing Network.  This special offer message is powered by TargitInteractive, an ItsImazing affiliate partner.
    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]  *The introductory rate on purchases is for 2 or 3 billing periods after account opening,  depending upon the account for which you qualify. For more complete pricing information, see important  Terms and Conditions  for GetSmart SM Visa
.   You must be a U.S. resident and at least 18 years of age to apply. This offer  may not be available to current Providian credit card customers and employees of Providian. The GetSmart Visa card is currently available in all U.S. states  except Wisconsin.  If you previously asked to be excluded from GetSmart or Providian product offerings  and solicitations, they apologize for this e-mail. Every effort was made to ensure that you were excluded from this e-mail. However, if GetSmart does  not have your current e-mail address in their database, they were unable to prevent this e-mail from reaching you. If you do not wish to receive  promotional e-mail from GetSmart, please click here  and let us know.  Providian National Bank - Member FDIC Providian Bank - Member FDIC  Thank you.  ? 1999-2001 Providian Financial Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
     If you would like to opt-out of TargitInteractive, please click here .


The following items were presented in this week's corporate change control....

Jan 28
Beginning at 6:00 p.m., the Telephony team will remove the telephone switch from 3AC and migrate phone numbers.  The maintenance is expected to last approximately one hour.  Each block of numbers will experience an outage of a few minutes during which calls made to an affected number will not go through and will not roll to voice mail.  The numbers affected are: 345-5000...6999; 713-646-6000...6599; 713-646-7000...7999; 713-646-8200...8399; 713-646-8600..8699; 713-646-9700...9799; 713-345-0200...2999.  The number 713-345-7000 to access voice mail will not be affected by this maintenance.  However, any number within these maintenance groups will be affected regardless of whether it was moved from 3AC.  This change will impact ETS users.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


Six are giving presentations - we will select probably three of these as preferred providers

URS
ENSR
Tetra Tech
Retec
Camp Dresser
Golder

at the end of this week we will know who the top ranked firms are - we use the top two a lot at this time

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Michael E
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Eckels, Diane
Subject:	Environmental Consultants

Diane,

Can you send me the list of environmental consultants you guys are considering?  Any other relevant info.

Thanks
Mike