I got this from some hunter friends.  Thought you would like to read it.

DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000
10:15 AM ---------------------------

Alton Smith <altsmith@cisco.com> on 09/15/2000 08:25:26 AM
To: mail143232@pop.net
cc: byd@digitex.net, david_craft@wbw-pc.com, imopiano@io.com,
geoterri@flash.net, ghammond@mdavidlowe.com, jeff_graham@condley.com,
Mfowler1@airmail.net, nealk@wt.net, randy.g.kruger.jr@arthuranderson.com,
sschroed@us.ca-indosuez.com, b3wells@aol.com, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dennis.patrick@telops.gte.com, Abel_Acosta@cca.court.state.tx.us,
mail143232@pop.net, randy@mcdonaldinc.com, Eric.Gunther@sabre.com,
eric.kupper@sabre.com, rambo1@oknet1.net, ClintonMur@aol.com,
wwhent@lipan.net, Sgt_Maj@email.msn.com, fbarowsk@cisco.com,
jeff@huntingwithjeff.com
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099

Sorry for the wide distribution.  However, I thought all my hunting buddies
should be aware of what's going on.  Who knows we may be asked to register
sling shots in the future.

Thanks

>From: "Jim  Hamilton" <jrham@worldnet.att.net>
>To: "Alton Smith" <altsmith@cisco.com>
>Subject: Fw: Senate Bill SB-2099
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:45:34 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
>
>This along with the other smoke and mirrors is becoming the norm for our
>Government. WHY do they fear honest law abiding citizens exercising their
>2nd amendment constitutional rights? If anyone thinks that the NRA is a
>little club of paranoid reactive, they should review their feelings. Send
>this on to everyone you know.  It is time to vote and let these individuals,
>that suppose they are above the law and can rewrite and violate our
>constitutional rights, know they are mistaken. These people know it would be
>very difficult to eliminate our rights through the front door and in the
>light of day. They will seek any and all methods to accomplish these agendas
>behind the scenes.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Burnett <mtdburnett@hotmail.com>
>To: barandbag@mediaone.net <barandbag@mediaone.net>; P015@persnet.navy.mil
><P015@persnet.navy.mil>; GRANATHA@aol.com <GRANATHA@aol.com>;
>allanwendt@hotmail.com <allanwendt@hotmail.com>; ahansen367@home.com
><ahansen367@home.com>; rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com <rjwolfe@mlt.uspa-ira.com>;
>flyov10s@aol.com <flyov10s@aol.com>; perrymm89@yahoo.com
><perrymm89@yahoo.com>; cnaarndt@aol.com <cnaarndt@aol.com>; mamzic1@aol.com
><mamzic1@aol.com>; smokinf18@aol.com <smokinf18@aol.com>;
>davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com <davidson.morse@morgankeegan.com>;
>Doerings2@aol.com <Doerings2@aol.com>; DDBaggett@aol.com
><DDBaggett@aol.com>; keprice95@aol.com <keprice95@aol.com>; stearns@hctc.net
><stearns@hctc.net>; smithgh@rocketmail.com <smithgh@rocketmail.com>;
>greg.fred@juno.com <greg.fred@juno.com>; delvoeg@aol.com <delvoeg@aol.com>;
>jrham@worldnet.att.net <jrham@worldnet.att.net>; jrham51@yahoo.com
><jrham51@yahoo.com>; btarlton@aol.com <btarlton@aol.com>;
>jeffhardee@hotmail.com <jeffhardee@hotmail.com>; Mitch3p@aol.com
><Mitch3p@aol.com>; bchdriver1@aol.com <bchdriver1@aol.com>;
>jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com <jeffrey.kuhn@autozone.com>; jwconnors@aol.com
><jwconnors@aol.com>; johnnycme@aol.com <johnnycme@aol.com>;
>pjschmitt@fedex.com <pjschmitt@fedex.com>; JBrown8245@aol.com
><JBrown8245@aol.com>; Delta75@aol.com <Delta75@aol.com>; KAPD39@aol.com
><KAPD39@aol.com>; Ringledoc1@aol.com <Ringledoc1@aol.com>;
>Raymo1@ix.netcom.com <Raymo1@ix.netcom.com>; prendad@aol.com
><prendad@aol.com>; r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net
><r.r.cameron@worldnet.att.net>; RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil
><RayfieldRS@hqda.army.mil>; ronbo@newbernnc.com <ronbo@newbernnc.com>;
>PILOTFA@aol.com <PILOTFA@aol.com>; SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com
><SMcNabb@ENERGY.TWC.com>; scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com <scotkilt@m3.sprynet.com>;
>wedgewise@aol.com <wedgewise@aol.com>; stevesande@aol.com
><stevesande@aol.com>; vsorlie@home.com <vsorlie@home.com>; weshope@juno.com
><weshope@juno.com>
>Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:53 PM
>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>
>
>>FRIENDS,
>>PLEASE FORGIVE THE LARGE LIST.  THIS COULD BE A BIG DEAL TO SOME OR ALL OF
>>YOU.  AN OLD AND RELIABLE MARINE FRIEND OF MINE SENT THIS.  TAKE A LOOK AND
>>ACT ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN CONSCIENCE.
>>THANKS,
>>MARTY
>>
>>
>>>From: "Joe & Norma Morris" <sbeanokie@tah-usa.net>
>>>To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@tah-usa.net
>>>Subject: Senate Bill SB-2099
>>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:56:58 -0500
>>>
>>>Got this last night,
>>>Thought  all you guys who may not have known before would like to see what
>>>is going on behind the scenes  with the IRS now. Very disturbing
>>>Bill
>>>---- Original Message -----
>>>From: Bryant L. Metler
>>>To: Zana Smith
>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:38 PM
>>>Subject: Be aware, Bill -- The following message is for you and freedom
>>>loving Oklahomans
>>>
>>>
>>>The following was forwarded to me today by my son David;  we will
>>>immediately begin the battle against this end-run around the Constitution
>>>!!!
>>>
>>>Subject:  Fw: This is not good!
>>>
>>>I have read this Senate Bill, this message is serious.
>>>
>>>Tim
>>>
>>> > OK folks, time to let them know...Toll free number: 888-449-3511
>>> >
>>> > Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2000 1040 federal tax
>>> > form
>>> > all guns that you have or own. It may require fingerprints and a tax of
>>>$50
>>> > per gun.  This bill was introduced on Feb. 24. This bill will become
>>>public
>>> > knowledge 30 days after it is voted into law. This is an amendment to
>>>the
>>> > Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee can
>>> > pass
>>> > this without the Senate voting on it at all. The full text of the
>>>proposed
>>> > amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage. <http://www.senate.gov/>>> >
<http://www.senate.gov/> > You can find the bill by doing a search by
>>>the
>>> > bill number. (SB-2099)
>>> >
>>> > You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do.  Please send a copy of
>>> > this
>>> > e-mail to every gun owner you know to help.
>>> >
>>> > STOP this bill!!
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>
>>
>
Alton Smith

Systems Engineer
Global Systems Integrators
Cisco Systems

Office:  972-364-8802
Pager:  800-365-4578

http://www.cisco.com/go/uschannels/


missing deal for tom a

sell williams
260.00
25 mw
26th
pv
off peak


i don't wear fubu, i wear skidz.  it has jay-z, brand nubian, easy e, bone
thugs, big punisher, limp bizkit,


Amy -
I'd be very interested in participating in the Applied Energy Derivatives
class. Please let me know if there is still room, and if there's anything
else I need to do to sign up.

Thanks,
Kate

Amy FitzPatrick
04/30/2001 11:22 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: Derivatives I Training Course - June 4th and 5th

We will be offering Derivatives I training on-site.  If you are interested in
attending, please let Amy FitzPatrick know no later than May 21st.

Derivatives I - Applied Energy Derivatives
Presented by Paradigm Strategy Group

Date:    Monday, June 4th and Tuesday, June 5th
Time:  8:00 am to 5:00 pm

This course is appropriate for all employees wishing to obtain a practical
understanding of the basic natural gas and power derivative structures that
are traded and marketed today.  An emphasis is placed on understanding how
financial tools are added to physical structures to meet the risk management
needs of clients.

Participants attending this seminar will be able to:

Formulate customer hedge strategies based on a solid understanding of risk;
its impact on capital structures and approaches to its mitigation.
Develop and interpret forward prices in the context of arbitration
disciplines, as well as understand the divergences from these disciplines
that are characteristic of energy prices.
Identify marketing opportunities through an understanding of both the forward
curve and the distortions created by the physical system of production and
transportation.
Assemble the pricing of a transaction from a benchmark price curve.
Devise cost-reducing deal structures for gas storage from an understanding of
price curves and their components.
Exploit differences in locational pricing with insights into the relationship
between basis and transportation/transmission.
Structure a natural gas and power swap to hedge a company's risk position,
explaining its risks and benefits as a risk management tool.
Price a swap from the price curve and customize the structure to meet various
customer needs including earnings, cash flow and embedded financing.
Apply basis swaps to either mitigate locational risk or to achieve a more
favorable risk/reward position by altering the index location.
Attain a fluency in language concepts and hedging application of options.
Package strips of options to create caps, floors and zero-premium collars.
Create structures that provide energy users with sub-index pricing using
embedded options.
Recognize options embedded in common supply contracts and their pricing
implications, including swing, double-ups and index contracts with maximum
prices, etc.


DO GO AHEAD AND CC ROHAUER.  I AM SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION.  IT IS BRADFORD AND KITCHEN THAT DO NOT WANT THE DETAIL.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:47 AM
To:	Antonoff, Rick; Aronowitz, Alan; Clark, Morris; Cook, Mary; Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Evans, Mark (London Legal); Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Jones, Tana; Kalembka, Lech; Keohane, Peter; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; McCullough, Travis; Mellencamp, Lisa; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Portz, David; Rohauer, Tanya; Sager, Elizabeth; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Simons, Paul; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John; Von Bock Und Polach, Marcus; Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Master Netting Agreements Status Upsdates: READ
Importance:	High

DO NOT SEND YOUR STATUS UPDATES TO KITCHEN, BRADFORD, ROHAUER, JUST TO ST. CLAIR AND COOK.  WE WILL SUMMARIZE FOR THEM, THEY DO NOT WANT SEPARATE EMAILS FROM EVERYONE.  THANKS.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Please coordinate with Sharron on Rick's schedule and get back with Kristin to set up a meeting. Thanks. --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gandy, Kristin
Sent:	Thursday, May  31, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Causey, Richard; Beck, Sally
Subject:	UT undergrad recruiting

Hello Rick and Sally,

My name is Kristin Gandy and I wanted to introduce myself.  As you probably already know Lexi Elliott recently passed UT recruiting onto me.

I was wondering if you both had some time next week to get together.  I would like to formally meet you, as well as discuss Fall recruiting and the strategy Lexi and I have already worked on.

Regards,

Kristin Gandy
Associate Recruiter
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street EB 1163
Houston, Texas  77002

713-345-3214
kristin.gandy@enron.com


Nat gas is at a discount with Enron stock at 83 and what's your stock price.
Did I tell you the company is going to give us more stock options at the
start of the year.  Oh-and we get free bus passes.  So not only do they
provide me with free lunch every day-oh-did I  forget to mention that
too.-but they pay for my transportation to work.


30 hours this week, Tuesday through Friday, no exceptions

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Sara,
Do we have anything that we can share with this execution broker which documents the relationship between ECT Investments Inc. and Enron Corp.?
Thanks, Sheila

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jacqueline Tokley <jtokley@monumentderivatives.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jacqueline+20Tokley+20+3Cjtokley+40monumentderivatives+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:01 PM
To:	Glover, Sheila
Subject:	RE: Terms of Business

Sheila,
Many thanks for the reply. Can you clarify for us the function that ECT
provides within the group and also if there is a corporate brochure or other
information available that explains the role in more detail.
Regards
Jacqueline

-----Original Message-----
From: Sheila.Glover@enron.com [mailto:Sheila.Glover@enron.com]
Sent: 25 September 2001 14:21
To: jtokley@monumentderivatives.com
Cc: Kimberley.Hopley@enron.com; Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
Subject: RE: Terms of Business

Jacqui,
I have forwarded Monument's updated document to Enron's legal department.
ECT Investements, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron North America
Corp. which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron Corp.  Enron Corp is a
Fortune 100 company and Financial Statements are readily available on the
web or from other published sources.

ECT Investments Inc does not issue any separate financial statements.

Our prime brokers are Goldman Sachs International, London, Tom Threlfall
contact, 207-552-5068, and Morgan Stanley, NY, Joe Marovich, 212-762-5227.

Please do not hesitate to call if you need anything.
Regards,
Sheila

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jacqueline Tokley <jtokley@monumentderivatives.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jacqueline+20Tokley+20+3Cjtokley+40monumentderivatives+2E
com+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:12 AM
   To:     Glover, Sheila
   Subject:  RE: Terms of Business

   Sheila,
   Please could you E Mail or Fax some information on ECT Investments Inc
   for
   our records
   Please provide latest financials together with how this entity ECT
   Investment Inc fits within the group.

   Please also arrange for Prime Broker details to be provided.

   Many thanks for your assistance

   Regards
   Jacqui Tokley
   >  -----Original Message-----
   > From:      Jacqueline Tokley
   > Sent:      17 September 2001 16:58
   > To:   'sheila.glover@enron.com'
   > Subject:   Terms of Business
   >
   >
   > Further to our conversation we are pleased to attach an E Mail copy of
   the
   > Terms of Business in the name of the new entity.
   > Copies together with a covering letter will be forwarded to you
   shortly
   >
   > Regards
   > Jacqui Tokley << File: 201543.doc >>  << File: 201544.doc >>
   >
   *************************************************************************
   > The information in this internet E-mail is confidential and is
   intended
   > solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in
   it
   > by anyone else is unauthorized. Any views or opinions presented are
   > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
   > Monument Derivatives or any of its affiliates. If you are not the
   > intended recipient please contact  postmaster@monumentderivatives.com
   >
   *************************************************************************
   >
   >
   >

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Mornin' Sunshine!!!
I need unit names for all of the following deals please:
593484
593486
594911
594915
595073
597061
597063
597065
598151
598153
And if you wouldn't mind strolling through the trade floor and smacking all
the new hourly guys around who keep entering their deal with "yes agreement"
instead of "not to be confirmed" -that'd be great too (might relieve a little
stress also!)
Thanks!
Kim


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/22/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

John_Mable@dom.com on 08/22/2000 02:33:04 PM
To: heather.kroll@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com,
nwodka@bracepatt.com
cc: Dutch_Bumgardner@dom.com, Gary_Edwards@dom.com, Jeff_L._Jones@dom.com,
mlafratta@mcguirewoods.com, Ed_Roarty@dom.com, Tim_Talmadge@dom.com

Subject: Edgecombe

Attached is a draft blackline and clean copy of the Edgecombe PPA.  We did not
address the issue of security in this draft, but still regard it as an open
item
subject to further discussion.

We look forward to receiving the information on the fuel arrangements,
equipment
specifications and construction cost estimates so we can better evaluate the
proposal you presented last Thursday.

(See attached file: VP August 21 2000 blackline PPA.DOC)(See attached file: VP
August 21 2000 clean PPA.DOC)

 - VP August 21 2000 blackline PPA.DOC
 - VP August 21 2000 clean PPA.DOC


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Jeff/Sue--I keep hearing conflicting reports on whether Riordan is really going to run....what's the read in California?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:	RE: Riordan contact with WPTF

Ridota's a tough customer.  Very political type--knee-capper from the Wilson administration who was involved in the conflicts between Fessler and Knight, large customers and utilities, etc.  DA and Dereg done right (i.e., California never de-regulated) sound good.  May want to add the great job Davis did at locking a generation of Californians into $46 billion of contracts.  Maybe, on the energy issue, Riordin wants to look like a statesman, saying that if he were governor, he'd get everyone to the table to settle this thing once and for all--law suits, bad DWR contracts, ensuring customers have choices.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara, Susan
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:	Riordan contact with WPTF

Gary Ackerman was contacted by the campaign and agreed to meet with them on the 22nd. He will meet with Joe Ridota who is responsible for energy policy.  Gary would like some direction -- I'll be chatting with Gary on DA and let's do deregulation right.  ANything else you'd like to me pass along?


YES!

	"Swanstrom, Bill" <BSwanstrom@lockeliddell.com>
	10/26/2000 01:55 PM

		 To: "'mark.e.haedicke@enron.com'" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Mark

I have front row seats right behind the Rockets bench (I think you've sat
there before) for the opening home game next Tuesday (Halloween night).  Can
you join me?  I think Lyons was going to make it as well.

H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com <mailto:bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com>
(713) 226-1143


I don't think I am going to giv an inch on this one.  Edith confirmed that the fixed basis we applied in the contract implies that we used peak only.  If they want a split then we need to increase the fixed basis.

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gahn, Scott
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Cc:	Cross, Edith
Subject:	Re: OC Contract Question

The deal structure was initially all on peak, but migrated to 55/45 on/off peak.  That was the split at which the desk wanted all of these deals structured.  This was the intent of the deal at contract signing.  The contract does not reflect this intent adequately.  This has been known and discussed for some time - almost 2 years.  But, reorgs and departures have apparently left it unfixed all this time.  The last I knew John Wack was working to fix this over a year ago.

Let me know if you need anything else.

From:	Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/25/2001 05:11 PM
To:	Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Edith Cross/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	OC Contract Question

Scott -

Edith and the group are working on OC contract review-rebooking.  We have a serious question about intent vs. what is explicitly stated in the contract.  As I understand it, you might have been the deal lead on this one.  Just want your honest opinion on this one and we will proceed based on that.  Let me know if you have a chance to discuss with us as we are waiting on this determination before we move forward with customer discussions.

Thanks,
Rogers


TO: Houston Area Employees Participating in the Domestic Medical Plan Benefits

You may have recently received communication from United HealthCare (UHC)
concerning Memorial Hermann Health Systems' (MHHS) decision to terminate
their contract with UHC  in the Houston/Beaumont area.  This communication
also included the names of physicians who will be dropped from the network
due to this action.  It is our intent to help you understand the situation.

It is our understanding that Memorial Herman Health Systems asked for a 40%
increase in fees - a substantial increase that would have been passed on to
you and Enron!  When United HealthCare attempted to negotiate with a counter
proposal, Memorial Hermann cancelled their contract.

While this contractual arrangement was between the hospital system and UHC,
Enron continues to support UHC in their ongoing contract negotiation
efforts.  At this time, it is only UHC which has been affected, however, it
is our understanding that Cigna has also been contacted by the hospital group
and may be in contract negotiations at this time as well.

Many doctors have obtained admission privileges to other area hospitals
within the UHC Network or have contracted directly with UHC including those
with admission privileges to The Woodlands, Sugarland and Clear Lake
Hospitals, to name a few.  In a further effort to limit disruption to our
affected employees and families who are enrolled in the UHC Network or EPO
options, Enron has authorized UHC to process claims incurred between
September 28 and December 31, 2000 as if the termination of the Memorial
Hermann Health Systems from the network had not occurred and In-Network
benefits applied.  Office visits will have a $10 copayment and all other
charges will be covered at 90%.  Hospital admissions will still need to be
pre-certified with UHC.

These steps have decreased the number of participants' affected by Primary
Care Physician disruption from 1,050 to 127.

If You Need Medical Attention:  You or your doctor/hospital must call UHC's
customer service number so proper benefits can be verified.  In some cases
the hospital or doctor may request payment at the time service is performed.
If this should happen, please obtain an itemized statement and submit it to
UHC with a claim form for prompt reimbursement.  Claim forms can be obtained
by calling 1-800-332-7979 or in Houston at 713-853-7979 ( press 1).

Open enrollment materials will be coming soon.  Take this opportunity to
consider your elections for 2001.

United HealthCare and Enron HR are committed to assisting Enron employees
through this transition.  We will communicate any  further developments that
may impact you or your family.


You've got to love idiotic calls, don't you?  An onside kick after you've won
the game?  What was Barnett  thinking?

I don't think I'll ever watch another Aggie football game...ohh, the misery.
I can't handle the emotional rollar coastar.

Anyway, How was Thanksgiving?  Did you make your trip out to pick up the 15
ft christmas tree?  Or was it bigger this year?  We made the journey to
Tuscaloosa.  The trip wasn't too bad.  That TV/VCR is a lifesaver.  I ate way
too much, but it sure was good.

Hope everthing's going good for you and the family.

D

"buylow" <buylow@houston.rr.com> on 11/27/2000 07:54:02 AM
To: "Daren Farmer" <daren.j.farmer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Football

Sorry about the game.
?
It was not a good year for the Corn Boys and  Aggies.
?
Later,
Ken


---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
08:50 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/25/2001 08:29 AM

To: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Free Beer tonight

T Jae --can you forward to the group.  Thanks.

Christi has invited everyone to Saint Arnold Brewing Company for tonight
(Wednesday) 6-8 for free beer.   The address is 2522 Fairway Park Drive.

From 610 Loop Take 290 to 34th/Antoine. Make U-turn.  Turn right on
Mitchelldale.  Turn left on Fairway Park.

No ticket needed -- Just show up and have FUN!!


Shelley, I wanted to see if I could get the PAA in for Ava.  I think she did a very good job on the
	Transwestern meeting and I would like to recognize her for that.  If you approve, then I will
	send to Fran to fill out the appropriate information.  Thanks. Lynn


Russell,

These are all of our book names:

GD-NEW
GD-NEWJR
FT-WEST
FT-NORTHWEST
MGMT-WEST
WEST-NW
WEST-SW
WEST-PERM
WEST-SJ

For Basis, add  -BAS to the end of the book name.  For Gas Daily, add  -GDL
to the end of the book name.  Call me if you have any questions.

DG    3-9573


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:
Date: ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Subject:


Did you guys get this?

I was too interested in the conversation to interrupt with comments about
risk/return & valuation of assets for utilities.  I thought I would mention to
you, however, that when decisions are quantified, utilities usually use
classical decision analysis, i.e., von Neuman utility curves.  If the decision
is for unregulated assets or impacts shareholders directly, it is the
President's curve; if the decision would be covered in rates, it is the
customers' curves or equivalently the PUC's curve.

I think if I were going to approach valuation in commodities where the
assumptions of Black/Scholes do not apply, I would start with the CAPM for
large industries in an area, use pro formas to translate this to utility
curves for the input commodities, and add the utility curves.

Another issue:  The factor that explains why Enron is lowest bidder is its
role in the market.  In the 1930s, Keynes argued that if most market
participants with long position were hedgers, futures prices would be higher
than spot; if they were speculators or traders, future prices would be lower
than spot.  Traders must be compensated for holding the risk; hedgers
(including utilities and consumers) are willing to pay a premium for the
certainty.  Consequently, Enron traders have bigger bid/ask spreads and lower
bid prices.

Just some random thoughts,
Michael

-----Original Message-----
Date:  01/04/2001  10:41 am  (Thursday)
From:  "Heather Mason" <hmason@hesinet.com>
To:  HQ3.EM5(Michael Schilmoeller)

Mark Your Calendar-Tuesday January 23, 2001 Downtown Houston Hyatt Hotel

Henwood will be hosting a comprehensive ERCOT Symposium on Tuesday,  January
23, 2001. A team of Henwood regional power market specialists will be
presenting the latest analysis and
information to assist you in preparing for the new ERCOT Restructured Power
Market, in addition to an anlysis of the issues now playing out in the WSCC
markets.   Coffee and registration will
begin at 9:30 AM  and the program will run until 3:00 PM.  Lunch and snacks
will be provided.

Agenda topics include:

* What will be the critical-success factors for qualified scheduling entities
operating in ERCOT's new wholesale & retail markets?
* How will market restructuring impact mid to long-term wholesale prices?
* What is the outlook for new generation?
* What are the impacts of upcoming emission regulations on ERCOT's generation
resources?
* What are the new analytical tools available to capture market uncertainty
impacts to your supply contracts and generation assets?
* What are the restructuring lessons learned from the California experience
and the implications to ERCOT?

In conjunction with this Program, Henwood will have a demonstration room
available to present its latest software applications and e-business
solutions. A nominal $75 registration fee is required
to reserve a space in the workshop.

For more information or to reserve your spot, please contact Heather Mason at
Henwood: hmason@hesinet.com or 916/569-0985.

About Henwood: Henwood offers integrated business solutions, strategic
consulting, and innovative e-Business applications to meet the challenges of
the restructured energy markets throughout
North America, Australia, and Europe, serving clients that include eight of
the ten top utilities in North America, in addition to energy services
providers and power marketers.


At Brent's request, I am sending you the memo below.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 09:41 AM -----

	Molly Harris
	10/18/2000 06:37 PM

		 To: Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Evan
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Springs SWAP Confirmations

From a Credit perspective, I informed Allison that credit provisions are not
required for these particular deals since I learned of the trades 2 days ago
(after the deals had been executed without our approval upfront).   Credit
believes it does not make sense to execute stand alone financial deals.
These deals should be executed as amendments to the pricing component of the
physical contracts (i.e., a restructuring).  This process would mitigate the
operational, credit and legal risks of this proposed business.  My
understanding of the business strategy of EES is to enter into financial
transactions to hedge the portfolio, not to execute financial trades with end
users.  Please advise if the legal position is changing.

Assuming we are unable to achieve the aforementioned solution, these deals
raise more significant issues regarding support and control of new business
endeavors for EES which already has significant infrastructure and control
issues.  It raises issues to be resolved on:

Credit approval and monitoring
Credit provisions
Legal support in EES with financial and ISDA experience
Netting issues and additional credit risk from having multiple masters with
our clients (physical and financial)
Execution of masters post trade execution
Capturing and monitoring these OTC financial trades separate from financial
settlements of physical trades
Managing portfolio position risk
Operational issues capturing and properly valuing the trades
Operational support for confirmations and ensuring timely execution

In short, we need to establish processes to support this business.  I will
set up a meeting with relevant parties to discuss further.

In respect to the attached confirmations for Springs, additional questions
should be raised with regard to operational/billing and legal implications
for consolidated billing of financial and physical invoices.  This has been
specified in the payment date.  Is EES capable of accomplishing this
operationally today?  Doesn't this raise legal issues of consolidated billing
and settlements under two different contracts which do not stipulate netting
(physical with financial)?

Regards
Molly

From: Tana Jones on 10/18/2000 12:37 PM
To: Allison McHenry/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Springs SWAP Confirmations

I'm sure you all know this by now, by Molly Harris had told me this deal does
not need any additonal credit terms added.

	Allison McHenry@EES
	10/17/2000 05:35 PM

		 To: Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: molly.harris@enron.com, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Springs SWAP Confirmations

Attached are the most current versions of the Springs SWAP Confirmations,
with changes suggested by Joe Hunter, and Annex A. Molly advised us not to
send the confirmations noting Credit Provisions would follow. Tana has
offered to help us draft the Credit attachment if we give her the details.
Again, I am turning my file over to Karen Cordova while I am on vacation, and
the confirmations are located under J:\Legal\SWAPs\Sales. Thanks and see you
on the 25th.


Here is the latest, with comments from everyone.  MDS


Fine as written.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Kelly
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Audit & Compliance Minutes - October 8, 2001
Importance:	High

Please provide comments to the attached excerpt by Friday, November 2nd. If you approve as written, please let us know. Regards, Paula

 << File: KEAN 10-8-01.doc >>
Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email or its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank you.


Thanks, Alan.  I just got off the phone with the other candidate, Donald
Duncan, and he, too, appears strong.  Donald has been an in-house energy
lawyer in Houston for 24 years, most recently with Eagle Global Logistics
(EGL), an international freight forwarder, which he left in May.  EGL is
suffering severe financial problems which comes as no surprise since their
principal client base are the computer manufacturers and tech companies that
have all suffered dramatic losses over the past 3-5 quarters.

Notably, Donald spent 9 years with Pennzoil's mining business and, as such,
is intimately familiar with the coal industry.  He also worked on a major
coal seam degasification project for Sonat in the '80s in the Black Warrior
Basin of Alabama.

Donald has the advantage of being familiar with both the coal and freight
industries and of being already in Houston.  He is very interested in you
and, as with Jerry Prager, let me encourage you to call him directly if you
are interested in speaking with him.  He is available anytime after 2:00
p.m. today and anytime tomorrow morning.  He can be reached at 713.515.4863.

Of course, if you are interested in additional information, please feel free
to give me a call.  Best regards,

Lee Allbritton
888.296.5770 (tel)

----- Original Message -----
From: <Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com>
To: <allbritton@clausman.com>
Cc: <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Coal/Freight Candidate Jerry Prager

> I will try to give him a call later today.
>
> Alan
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Lee Allbritton" <allbritton@clausman.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Lee+20Allbritton+22+20+3Callbritton+40clausman+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:46 AM
>    To:     Aronowitz, Alan
>    Cc:     Cash, Michelle
>    Subject:  Coal/Freight Candidate Jerry Prager
>
>
>    Good morning, Alan.  Since our last discussion  yesterday, I have had a
>    detailed conversation with Jerry Prager and am pleased  to report that,
>    not only is he an experienced energy lawyer who is very familiar  with
>    the coal industry, but that he is also experienced in the legal issues
>    involved in the freight and transportation of coal and other energy
>    products.  Licensed in both Texas and Ohio, of course, Jerry is an
>    attractive candidate.  Interestingly, when he had his own law practice
>    in  Dallas ('97 -- '99), he represented Enron Oil & Gas in Mexico on a
>    variety  of upstream transactions.  He is also fluent in Spanish.
>
>    Jerry is available to visit with you today or  tomorrow afternoon by
>    telephone.  His direct number in Cincinatti is  513.721.5525 and I want
>    to encourage you to call him directly if you are  interested.  I will
be
>    out of the office between 10:00 and 1:00, but will  be in the office
>    this afternoon if you would like to visit.  Best  regards,
>
>    J. Lee Allbritton, Jr.
>    Vice President, General  Counsel & Director of Attorney Recruiting
>    Clausman Legal Staffing,  Inc.
>    816 Congress Avenue, Ste. 1100
>    Austin, Texas 78701
>    512.493.5770  (tel)
>    512.493.5771 (fax)
>    888.296.5770  (toll-free)
>
>


All:

To whom should Risk Management & Trading Corp. ("RMT") direct the swap
confirmation related to RMT's hedge management fee with Enron Nordic Energy
(Norwegian branch of Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.)?
The previous transaction was dated February 24, 1999 and requires amendment.

Please let me know.

Sara


who you taking with the second?  can't trade it can you?


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 05:04 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/06/2000 04:58 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'"
<David_Aamodt@pgn.com>, "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

Here is your copy of the final version sent to the Commission.
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


<<Bio-Tech 11-7-00.doc>>
Please forgive the delay in getting this additional action item to you,
however it was necessary to take the time to reach a consensus among all
interested parties.  This will be included on the action agenda tomorrow.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim Kollaer at 713-844-3601.

Arlene McCarty
Executive Assistant to the President and CEO
Greater Houston Partnership
(713)844-3602 Phone
(713)844-0202 Fax
amccarty@houston.org

www.houston.org

 - Bio-Tech 11-7-00.doc


can you fill this out for me?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/02/2001 12:31 PM -----

	Tara Rafter
	03/02/2001 10:58 AM

		 To: Joe Allen/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Hap
Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wiley Cauthen/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn
Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Fitzgerrell/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Alberto Levy/SA/Enron@Enron, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Thane
Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella
Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vinio Floris/Corp/Enron@Enron, Xi
Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tracy Cooper/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Rochelle
Lessner/ENRON@enronxgate, Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen E Magruder/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky L
Merola/TNPC/EES@EES, FRED MILLER/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christie
Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Fred
Rimington/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gavin Russo/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Scarborough/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kathleen Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Charles Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lobbying Questionnaire Clarification

It has come to my attention that there has been some confusion regarding the
Lobbying Questionnaire that I sent out on Feb. 20, 2001 and which is due on
March 9, 2001.  Please note that it is NOT necessary to gather your expenses
attributable to your lobbying activities rather I just need an allocation of
your time/hours spent engaging in such activity during the year 2000.  I
apologize for any confusion.  Thank you - Tara Rafter


7:2 at 2:1

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 05:42 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

new odds

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 7:44 AM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

i'll take 10:1 this morning

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/16/2001 07:40 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

thats pleasant

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 3:29 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

eat my shorts

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 05:01 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

3:1 and your on
Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

the implied market on that from put spreads is 5.3:1.    I'll take 4:1.
that's all the juice i'll pay.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 07:59 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: ng views + wager

Most import  - the wager - I will take the over on May NG (4.95). 2:1 is
okay--- $5 per penny okay?

Agree - Products
Rally is not different for products. 92% of heating oil is made ondemand
(storage is not as important as in nat gas) Heat will get ugly this October
and then give it up (unless we have 7 blizzzards in the Northeast very
early).
SOme things to consider :
1- in the next 3-4 weeks we will finish the very heavy maintenance season and
be in full blown gasoline season.
- yields will be preferentially shifted for HU
3- nobody will pay any attention to HO
2-HO will have incremental demand due to utlity switching and will quietly
build slower than last year
4- therefore by September everyone will freak out
5- After the OCtober contract expires (HO) , everyone will realize (similar
to NG) that the world will not end.

Where does this get us:
1- Sell q3 HU crack and by Q4HO crack (By the time q3 prices out--the wind
will have been taken out of HU sails - plus you can do it month
avg--therefore less noise)
2-Benefit from heat's recent excitement -- sell HO calls (June -Aug), buy ng
puts nov-jan

Ng-Disagree:
I think prices stay high through June. The big drop off come some where in
July 15 to Aug 15 and downhill from there. (Looks like 1998)

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:41 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re: ng views

the only change that's happened to my long term outlook has been that the
weather in the short term has been more bullish and we'll have 30 or so bcf
less storage than i was anticpating in two weeks.  so yea, my curve is a
touch higher, but it doesnt change my longer term view.  most of the move
this week was a short sqeeze of spec shorts combined with a strong heat
market.  a little concerned about heat, but also saw products very strong
going into the season this past winter only to stage a huge failure.  not
convinced this rally in products is different.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 09:04 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ng views

where's your curve now?
MAy
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan 02

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759


Tana:

Neither of the CPs on today's list are authorized to trade US power products.

Royale Energy Inc. is restricted by credit, so we're restricting this CP as
well.
Koch Hydrocarbons Inc. is not a current trading partner and is not a FERC
approved power marketer.

Leslie


Read about Enron's inclusion on the Gay Financial Network's "gfn.com 50" in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FGT's Phase IV expansion
Clickpaper.com is added to two industry web sites
EES uses the 'Net to catch new customers
Learn what a swap is

It's all in the latest eBiz .  Go to home.enron.com , click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 11, 2001."


Just a reminder:  the following QBR has been scheduled for your unit:

 Date:   8/29/00
 Time:   1 pm - 4 pm
 Place:  EB3314
 Topic:  Coal & Emissions QBR

Please contact Kay (3x0643) or Beverly (5x7857) if you have any questions.
Thanks


Notice # 01-162
May 11, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Reminder and Clarification on NYMEX Division Post-Close Trading Sessions

DATE:          May 11, 2001
===========================================================
Reminder
Changes will be going into effect today, Friday, May 11, 2001 for the End
of Week post-close trading sessions and also, beginning on Monday, May 14,
2001, for the Monday-Thursday post-close trading sessions. The trading
range for all of these sessions will be expanded by adding the following
ticks above (below) the daily high (low) for the applicable contract month
(provided that this expanded trading range does not violate the maximum
permissible price fluctuation limits then in effect):
Crude Oil      20 ticks
Heating Oil         50 ticks
Unleaded Gas        50 ticks
Natural Gas         50 ticks

     Clarification
Previously, the trading range for the Monday-Thursday sessions was the
closing range for the applicable contract month. Exchange staff interpreted
the rule to provide that if a contract month did not trade during the
close, there would be no closing range and thus it would not be permissible
to trade that contract month during the post-close.  Now, as noted above,
the post-close session trading range on any day of the week will be an
expanded version of the daily range. Therefore, the Exchange is issuing the
following clarifications as to the contract months that can be traded
during a post-close session (on any day of the week):

1.   Only the first twelve listed contract months are eligible for trading
in the post-close.

2.   If a particular contract month does not trade during the RTH session,
it may not be traded during the post-close.

3.   It is not necessary for a contract month to trade during the close in
order to be traded in the post-close as long as it has traded during the
RTH session.

If you have any questions concerning these changes, please contact George
Henderson, Vice President, NYMEX Floor Department, at (212) 299-2071; Rob
Stasi, Manager of Trading Floor Systems, NYMEX Floor Department, at (212)
299-2067, or Brian Regan, Senior Associate General Counsel, at (212)
299-2207.

      Carr Futures
      150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
      Chicago, IL 60606  USA
      Tel:  312-368-6149
      Fax:  312-368-2281
      soblander@carrfut.com
      http://www.carrfut.com


Shelley,  can you give me some thoughts about Kathy's questions-  MK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kathy_patton@dynegy.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:58 PM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay
Cc:	Porter, J. Gregory; Pavlou, Maria; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: NNG's GISB Comments

Maria, I've attached below an exchange of Dynegy e-mails on the topic of
the 1 hour advance notice.  My concern, as expressed in the e-mail below,
is the complexity (and cost/benefit) of getting to a real-time, on-line
interactive computer system, versus one that requires some processing time.
I'm not sure how the Northern computer system is designed, but this may be
work raising.   I also raise the issue of how this works with EDI
nominations (assuming anyone is actually using EDI these days).  Again, I'm
not sure if this is relevant to the Northern system, but this reflects my
recollection of the way the pipelines in general used to explain to us how
their systems worked (i.e., batched processing, rather than interactive;
all mandatory fields filled in).  My recollection is dated by a few years,
so pipelines may have changed this once they went on the internet, rather
than EBBs and EDI.

I would also note that this was written before the Northern announcement
was made.  However, I have to admit that all my Dynegy pals have accused me
of going to other side since I've been at IP.

I've fine with your comments.  I'll provide you with my correct address
tomorrow.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Patton/DEC/Dynegy on 01/29/2002
requests comment on whether it should adopt the one-hour prior notice
requirement.  Comments are due in about 30 days.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:24
AM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 03/12/2001 04:17:06 PM
To: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tconstan@llgm.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
oject

Bill/Dale/Kay-

I've made redline edits with regards to LVCII performance guarantee values
in Section 10.7 for output and heat rate based on the Feb 8, 2001 guarantee
sheet.

Dale, please send revised LVC II facility agreement to reflect Units 25-28
with appropriate schedules for price, delivery, payment and termination
schedules at your earliest convenience.

The units 19-20 and 23-24 that are currently reflected in this document will
be left in E-Next (Turbopark).  The schedules for price, delivery, payment
will remain the same for these units.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project

Bill Williams asked me to forward the attached execution form of the
LM-6000 purchase contract.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.  I
understand that we received it from GE, and that it is available only in
pdf format.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)

 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5_redline031201.DOC


We will be releasing new version of the Stack Manager and the EnronOnline website tonight . The following are the changes

1. Changes to Stack Manager:

1.1 Changes to toolbar icons:
To facilitate further development of the system, it has been found necessary to change the toolbar icons at the top of the Stack  Manager. The attached file shows the old icon and its new replacement. Next to each image below is the description of the function that is executed as well as the short cut key that is mapped to the same function:

1.2 New Functionality - Auto Suspend
The Auto Suspend function allows traders to set an absolute price change from a price level at which you would like the system to automatically suspend a specific product. This function is useful if your products use automatic price resets.

To activate this feature:
1. Select a product and click on Product Properties
2. Check the Enable box
3. Enter the Price Check and Suspend at +/- values
4. Click Update
Example: a trader Enables Auto Suspend and selects a $35.00 Price Check and a suspension level of +/- $5.00: The system will suspend the product when the mid price is above  $40.00 or below $30.00

You will need to enter a new Price Check or disable the Auto Suspend function to reactivate this Product if the Auto Suspend is triggered.
Please note the system checks for any products that need to be suspended once a minute.

2. Changes to EnronOnline Website
 (These changes will be rolled out in phases over the next week and will be available to all customers only by Friday 5/4/01)

The following enhancements have been made to the EnronOnline Website:

2.1 Today's Transactions

Float Window:  In order to float the window, right click on the Today's Transactions section, click on the Float Window option.

Sort Ordering: Click on the column heading to change the sort order.

Linked Transactions: You can display the linked Transactions in an expanded or collapsed view. To do so, right click in the Transaction display area and select full Expand or Full Collapse.

2.2 Submission Box

The submission box has been modified in order to show a space between each set of "zeros" for the volume the customer wants to sell/buy.

Savita


March 23, 2001
Notice to Members Number:  01-109

TO:
ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Inventory Taxes on Aluminum in the State of Kentucky

Recently enacted legislation in the State of Kentucky has amended the
Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) Chapter 132.200, &Property subject to state
tax only8.  The amendment applies for property assessed on or after January
1, 2001.

Paragraph 21 of KRS 132.200 exempts for the purpose of taxation in the
county, city, school or other taxing district in which it has taxable situs:

Any nonferrous metal that conforms to the quality, shape, and weight
specifications set by the New York Mercantile Exchange,s special contract
rules for metals, and which is located or stored in a commodity warehouse and
held on warrant, or for which a written request has been made to a commodity
warehouse to place it on warrant, according to the rules and regulations of a
trading facility.

(a) &Commodity warehouse8 means a warehouse, shipping plant, depository, or
other facility that has been designated or approved by a trading facility as
a regular delivery point for a commodity on contracts of sale for future
delivery; and

(b) &Trading facility8 means a facility that is designated by or registered
with the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission under 7 U.S.C. secs. 1
et seq.  &Trading facility8 includes the Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the New York Mercantile
Exchange.

Please note that aluminum inventory remains taxable at the state level if the
aluminum is not deemed to be &in transit8.  Paragraph 10 of KRS 132.020
&State ad valorem taxes8 states that an ad valorem tax for state purposes of
five cents ($0.05) upon each one hundred dollars ($100) of value shall be
paid upon goods held for sale in the regular course of business.  KRS
132.097, &Exemption from state ad valorem tax of personal property held for
shipment out of state8, states that  &there shall be exempt from ad valorem
tax for state purposes, personal property placed in a warehouse or
distribution center for the purpose of subsequent shipment to an out-of-state
destination.  Personal property shall be deemed to be held for shipment to an
out-of-state destination if the owner can reasonable demonstrate that the
personal property will be shipped out of state within the next six (6)
months.8

Therefore, aluminum on warrant or for which a written request has been made
to place aluminum that meets the specification for delivery against the New
York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.,s Aluminum Futures Contract on warrant is now
uniformly taxed throughout the State of Kentucky regardless of the local
jurisdiction in which an Exchange Licensed Warehouse is located.

Companies who own aluminum inventory at Exchange Licensed Warehouses should
obtain professional advise regarding their particular tax situation.

Should you require any further information please contact Christopher Bowen
at 212-299-2200 or Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-109)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I gather John would like this taken care of straight away.  Could you please
keep me posted on the progress?  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 12:36
PM ---------------------------

John Greene
09/07/2000 12:17 PM
To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Instinet Terminal - Enron London

Laurel,

Please take care of this for us.  It is a contract to have an Instinet
terminal installed on my desktop here in London.

Thanks and regards,
John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Greene/LON/ECT on 07/09/2000 18:19
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark_Freeman@instinet.co.uk                           07/09/2000 11:10

To: John.greene@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron

Good afternoon John.

Attached is a suggested draft letter.  As it is from a US company to another
US
company, you may want to Americanise the salutations/layout etc !!

(See attached file: Enron- London terminal.doc)

As soon as I receive the signed version back form you, we can move ahead with
the installation process.

Kind regards.
Mark

 - Enron- London terminal.doc


Also,  is the trader Paul Lucci?  Please give me the name of a contact w/
phone number as well as complete address for Cenex.

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


i just realized michael didn't get anything for her. if you will ask him
what he wants to give her i will pick it up.


Here are the most recent versions of the US documents.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/28/99 11:06 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "David Gilberg" <GILBERGD@sullcrom.com>
07/27/99 01:42 PM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT, lkitchen@enron.co.uk
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
Subject: PA/ETA

Attached are revised drafts of the New York PA and ETA, which have been
revised to reflect the latest Clifford Chance drafts and our discussion
yesterday.  We are unable to blackline these drafts, due to the fact that the
Clifford Chance drafts are not on our system (and we did not receive all of
them in any event).  Also, we have not yet received from Mark's office the
language on confirmations; we have taken a shot at it but can obviously
modify it after we get the language.

Finally, we have attached a blackline of the "Legal and Privacy" statement,
reflecting some suggested changes.  We also note that, if this document is to
be "global", we will either need to decide on a single governing law or
delete choice of law entirely.

Best regards.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information that may be
privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.

 - PA.wpd
 - ETA.wpd
 - red.wpd


Johnny,

What does Greg owe you for the champagne?  Is it $896.00?

Liz


DAN,

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY IS 1663

DID YOU BUY ANY ?

CHRIS


To:	    Employees

From:	    ENRON Benefits Department

Subject:    All Employees Participating in the ENRON Domestic Benefit Plans

Enron Benefit Plans
Summary Annual Report

The basic financial and insurance information on the back of this page, as well as the material below, provide a Summary Annual Report for the Enron Benefit Plans.  The annual report for each plan has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

NOTE:  You may receive a report for a benefit plan in which you are not a participant or under which you are not entitled.  Entitlement to benefits under any of the plans is based on the provisions of each plan.

Your Rights to Additional Information

You have the right to receive, upon request, a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan.  For insured plans, insurance information (including any sales commissions paid by insurance carriers) is shown in the annual reports.

To obtain a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any plan, write or call:

Enron Corp Shareholder Relations
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7311

(713) 853-6161

You also have the right to receive from the plan administrator, on request and at no charge, a statement of the assets and liabilities of the plan and accompanying notes, or a statement of income and expenses of the plan and accompanying notes, or both.  If you request a copy of the full annual report from the plan administrator, these two statements and accompanying notes will be included as part of that report.

You also have the legally protected right to examine the annual report at the main office of the plan (Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX  77002-7311) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., or to obtain a copy from the U.S. Department of Labor upon payment of copying costs.  Requests to the Department should be addressed to:  Public Disclosure Room, N-5638, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed050101.pdf
 - ed050101.xls


At the request of David Minns their short name in Lotus Notes will be EAF
(for Enron Australia Finance).   David gave me a list of their masters, so I
am going to enter just the names and agreement.  David and Alison will flesh
out the rest of the data when he gets back.


i hope it becomes a hurricane too.  huricanne = $$$$ for me.  call me when
you get back from your 3 week vacation.  it must be really hard over there at
deloit.


Start Date: 1/24/02; DayAhead market;  DayAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.


Howdy all!

Just a reminder that you are invited to the Associate/Analyst Happy Hour we will be hosting at the Heathman Hotel on Friday, November 9th (4:30pm-6:30pm). Please let me know whether or not you are planning to attend.

I look forward to hearing from you (and seeing you on Friday)! :o)

Enjoy the rest of your week!

-Grace
x8321

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kearney, Julie
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 2:52 PM
To:	Mallory, Chris; Driscoll, Michael M.; Salisbury, Holden; Williams III, Bill; Oh, Jeffrey; Eriksson, Fredrik; Chen, Andy; Solberg, Geir; Cavanaugh, Darren; Oh, Jeffrey; Oh, John; Bishop, Serena; Rance, Susan; Coffing, Timothy; Warner, Nicholas; Elafandi, Mo; Mumm, Chris; Bruce, James; Calvert, Gray; Guillaume, David; Slinger, Ryan; Stokley, Chris; Frost, David; Nelson, Kourtney
Cc:	Rodriguez, Grace; Jarnagin, Josie
Subject:	Happy Hour!

The Fall Associate and Analyst Recruiting Super Saturdays are scheduled for Saturday, Nov 10 and Saturday, Nov 17.  The candidates arrive on Friday, are given a tour of the Floor and then presentations will be held thereafter.   The November 10 Event will be Analyst-level candidates.  The November 17 Event will be Associate-level candidates.

Now, here's the real info!    :  )

On both Fridays (Nov 9 & Nov 16) we will be sponsoring a get together (Happy Hour) at the Heathman for all the Associates & Analysts .  This means FREE drinks and food from 4:30 PM ---> 6:30 PM.  This will give you an opportunity to meet the candidates, check them out and if necessary "sell" them on Enron.

We will be sending out more reminders and confirmations, but block out your calendars for these two Fridays.  Let me know if you have any questions!

Julie K


please do

Timely baby hey or is it being induced

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:51 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

Well...today is the day.  Elizabeth is having the baby.  No news yet.  I'll give you a buzz when I hear something.

Dan


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000
04:06 PM ---------------------------
From: Paula Corey@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 09/12/2000 09:26 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Weeks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sheila Kahanek/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lou
Casari/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff Foster/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: president elect

----- Forwarded by Paula Corey/Enron Communications on 09/12/00 09:29 AM -----

	Shirley_Keeney@eogresources.com
	09/11/00 06:40 PM

		 To: Paula Corey/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
markessa@fbtc.net, otaku242@earthlink.net, jhk_sys@msn.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: president elect

Click on Lyrics; then select a candidate to get the words to the songs.
They will rap for you!  Very clever. I put
George and Bill behind the others - have fun!

Make sure to look at the words to the songs and enjoy!

(See attached file: JibJab (1).exe)
(See attached file: JibJab (1).exe)

 - JibJab (1).exe


Thanks for the clarification (Mike was a little off!) - we've killed 571801
and restored 571920.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 02:42 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/5 errors

571801 is the deal that is not good.  It is for Cal'02.
571920 for Cal'03 is a good deal and it was verbaled

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/05/2001 04:29 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 4/5 errors

PREBON
571801 was a duplicate of another sale to EES - Mike killed the duplicate
(#571920) and kept this deal

AMEREX
572245 - changed to BOM (4/9 - 4/30)

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 02:25 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/5 errors

BLOOMBERG
No Errors

PREBON WEST

Mike Swerzbin
DEAL 571801
Prebon does not recognize

AMEREX WEST

Dianna Scholtes
deal 572245
Amerex shows term as BOM we have in as 4/6-4/7


Can't, I'm going to a recruiting dinner.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           11/17/2000 08:30 AM

To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Keneally's

Anyone up for Keneally's after work today?


I discussed the work permit issue with the UK and they agree we need to apply
as quickly as possible - especially for you, Brent, as it usually takes 4
weeks.  Please complete this form as quickly as possible (Brent, for you
today would be great!) and email to Tara Rozen.  They can then file on
Friday.  If the permit is not in by April 1, we suggest you arrive without
your family until the permit is approved.

Jane


Your running backs suck.  I will give you Raymont Harris and Wayne Chrebet
for Freeman.


Modifications to the schedule are in red.  I will send out an updated schedule daily.

Thanks.

Debra


Thanks.

Susan D Trevino
11/16/2000 04:08 PM
To: Burton McIntyre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Burton - Please add Robin to your book distribution list.

   Robin - I have already added your name to my list.

Thanks,
Susan


Coming Full Circle: A Plausible Future for Power Generation

Speaker:
Amy Oberg
Manager, Competitive Intelligence and Future Foresight
Enron Energy Services

Wednesday, May 30
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
EB 5C2

To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1.

Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.

Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to
participate in this meeting.  Call 3-9390.


You are right, let's just do a contract.  I'll put one together.  Jeff

	Sarah Mulholland
	02/22/2001 07:08 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Last night Jennifer and I did my PRC review over dinner.  Of course
everything went well and Jen always does criticism in the most professional
manner.  I know you and I just talked about putting me in the trading track
program in order to get a salary increase, but I'd also like to discuss the
possibility of signing a contract.  I don't know if the trading track program
is right for me since I'm already working on a  book right now and would not
be rotating through different areas.  Please let me know when you might have
some time to talk about this.  Thanks.

Sarah


Yes this is correct.  This is the reason Sherry and Amy have to flip out
deals everyday.  EOL is only booking them to one leg.

Thanks,

Errol


On balance , this is a good thing- not great, but Barbara and Roy did a great
job to get the improvements they got- also, the seccuritization is good for
project motown assets.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 06/01/2000
07:02 AM ---------------------------

Barbara A Hueter
06/01/2000 06:23 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Susan T Covino/HOU/EES@EES, Becky L Merola/DUB/EES@EES, Susan M
Landwehr/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendy King/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Adam
Cooper/DUB/EES@EES, Mark Harada/HOU/EES@EES, Debbie Chance/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Lynnette Barnes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: MI: SB937 and SB1253 passed House last night

Late yesterday evening the Michigan House of Representatives approved the
package of electric restructuring bills, namely SB937 (vote of 72 -35) and
SB1253 (vote of 73 - 35).  The bills now go back to the Senate where the
changes made by the House are expected to be agreed to.  If this occurs,
which we expect it will, the bill will be signed by the Governor this weekend
and take immediate effect.

Attached is an initial summary of SB937 as passed by the House.  The House
accepted approximately 7 amendments on the floor.  This summary may be
updated should these amendments have any real impact on the bill for Enron.
Our initial assessment is that they do not - Eric Schneidewind and I are
meeting first thing Thursday morning to review them carefully.  We will keep
you updated.

Finally, regarding the issue of being subject to acquiring local franchises
as a condition of doing business in municipalities in Michigan:  You will
recall that we had language inserted into the bill in the Senate which
declared that Alternative Electric Suppliers would not be considered public
utilities.  This language would have deleted the requirement that we obtain
local franchises.  However, the Governor had made a deal with the MI
Municipal League that this issue would not be resolved in this legislation.
(This deal I believe was struck in the context of various other issues
pending among the legislature, governor and municipal league).  Late
yesterday, Senate Leader DeGrow came out in support of an amendment to
exclude schools (elementary, secondary, community colleges, universities,
etc...) from the local franchise for purposes of aggregation -- thus
upsetting the status quo which had been agreed to by the Governor and
Municipal League.  Senator DeGrow was firm in his support and said that in
order for the Senate to agree to House changes, this language had to be
added.  Well, the language was not added in the House --- due to overall
confusion.  So, we are going to talk with Senator DeGrow this morning to urge
him to go forward with the Senate agreeing to the House changes in the bill
and to consider the schools amendment in the context of exempting all
Alternative Electric Suppliers from local franchise requirements.  A bill or
amendment to this effect can be handled during the September session.
Customer groups are also going to do the same thing.  The Govenror supports
our position on this issue and we believe we have the momentum to get this
done when the legislature comes back in September.

Roy and I are available today if you have any questions.  You can reach Roy
at 630-654-6472. I can be reached this morning at 614-306-4359 and this
afternoon at 614-760-7472.


Vince:

I would like to take a day of vacation next Friday, October 6th if it ok.
Anita will be here.

Thanks!

Shirley


---------------------- Forwarded by Clement Lau/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2000 06:21
PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
05/26/2000 02:16 PM
To: Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Low Case Dispatch Analysis and Market Prices.

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 02:15 PM
---------------------------

"Mukherjee, Gautam VA01" <GMukherjee@icfconsulting.com> on 05/24/2000
07:30:12 PM
To: "Don Miller (E-mail)" <Don.Miller@enron.com>
cc: "Fusco, Maria VA01" <MFusco@icfconsulting.com>, "Goldman, Lenka VA01"
<LGoldman@icfconsulting.com>, "Leitz, Thomas VA01" <TLeitz@icfconsulting.com>
Subject: Low Case Dispatch Analysis and Market Prices.

Hi Don,
 Enclosed please find copies of the Low Case market results. Let
me know if you have any questions.

 <<98$ Email Format.xls>>  <<Nominal$ Email Format.xls>>  <<Email Format All
Hour Prices.xls>>

Thanks,

Gautam Mukherjee
Senior Associate
ICF Consulting
gmukherjee@icfconsulting.com
Voice (703) 934 - 3547
Fax (703) 934 - 3968

 - 98$ Email Format.xls
 - Nominal$ Email Format.xls
 - Email Format All Hour Prices.xls


He did go out of his way to sing your praises, so job well done.


Can you e-mail a copy of my CRRA tax structure presentation (presented last
Friday) to Kay and to Steve.


I have no idea who sent me this message. I did not like the sound of the name
so I forwarded it to both of you. It is not a pornographic e-mail but I the
name sounds funny. FYI. Trying to stay out of trouble. Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 08:28 AM
---------------------------

Pornlert <pornlert@loxinfo.co.th> on 12/21/2000 08:31:34 AM
To: James_R_Easter@reliantenergy.com, Michael.L.Brown@enron.com,
gwynn.gorsuch@enron.com, jamesrow@pdq.net, Rick.Buy@enron.com,
David_Chang@enron.net, Kim_Godfrey@enron.net, jshopley@wilrossandco.com,
julieann.kelly@gecapital.com, kara_knop@enron.net, nikhil_shah@enron.net,
Stephen_m_flynn@bankone.com, karissajohnson@hotmail.com,
Edward.smida@enron.com, mpopkin@enron.com, paul.adair@enron.com,
David.a.terlip@enron.com, jambler@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Back in the saddle again...

Dear All,
It is a pleasant surprise to receive a message from Jim that he is back in
Houston again. It reminds me of the days with Enron. Coincidentally, I have
heard that Enron office in Bangkok will be completely closed at the end of
the year. Thai market is just not sophisticated enough for Enron. I still
hope that this great company will come back to my country again perhaps
when the power pool becomes a reality. The people I met still asked me
about Enron. Even during the annual economic seminar hosted by the US
embassy in Septemder this year, one of the speaker from the US has cited
Enron as an example of how good a company from the old economy has adopted
to the new environment,by trading broad band anb offer risk hedging
instruments on line,etc. Apparently, Enron does have some fans here.
I, myself, will assume the position of managing director of the Post
publishing Company, the owner of Bangkok Post newspaper as from the
first of February next year. In the mean time I busy myself as the
financial advisor to the City of Bangkok, handling some debt restructuring
cases
for a living (including one steel plate mill), and exchange gossip on power
and telecom projects as hobbies.
If I might be useful to you, please do not hesitate to contact me at this
e-mail address: pornlert@loxinfo.co.th, fax (662)7193513, or Mob.(661)8590021.
Hoping to see some of you again,
Merry X'mas and Happy New Year,
Pornlert


I think you got this but here it is anyway.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
01:17 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
10/29/2000 02:39 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jonathan
Hoff/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:
Subject: Peakers Management Briefing -- Part II

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/29/2000 03:37 PM
---------------------------

Don Miller
10/29/2000 02:26 PM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES, Mike J
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chris
Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pete
McCormick/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Peakers Management Briefing -- Part II

Attached is an email form Duke outlining the topics for Monday's 1:30 pm
call. Please review the attached email and compare to the group my email went
to.  If I left someone off, please forward to them and invite to call.

 We will be meeting in 3321 for the call.

Thanks again for your continued assistance with this transaction.  Please
call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Don
3-0492
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/29/2000 03:18 PM
---------------------------

jpsynnott@duke-energy.com on 10/29/2000 12:35:54 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: mhhurtado@duke-energy.com
Subject: Peakers Management Briefing -- Part II

Don:

To confirm that we have scheduled a nominal two hour call on Monday (10/30)
at 1:30 CST to warp up the Peaker operational due diligence.  Duke has
arranged for a call in number  800/473-8492.  The conference host is Joe
Synnott.

Our focus on this call will be to review the status of our outstanding
requests and open questions.  An example of the former category are the
inspection reports at Gleason and the gas questions.  In the latter
category we still have some confusion about the units actual vs. guaranteed
performance data, status of the warranty items, historic transmission
performance, and relationship between the facility operations team and the
asset management function in Houston.    In addition our insurance staff
will be participating and will have some questions about the casualty loss
histories at the facilities.

Organizationally: please make available people on your team knowledgeable
in the operation and asset management of the facilities.  I would suggest
Ross, the plant managers, Mitch, and your environmental team.

Any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 713-627-6579.


Can you email over to me your Paragraph 11 too!  Thanks again.


Dear All,

On 25th October I announced my resignation from Enron Europe to pursue other
opportunities.  I just wanted to say that the past 3 1/2 years has been a
very interesting and positive experience for me, having been a key part of
such a dynamic and fast-moving organisation.  Enron is by far the best
organisation I have ever worked for, and I am proud to have had the
opportunity to work here and become a shareholder.  I have found it a real
pleasure to have worked with such talented and interesting individuals as
exist within Enron Europe and Enron Corp in Houston & Portland and I
genuinely wish you the best of success going forward.  I would also like to
take this opportunity to thank Vince Kaminski, John Sherriff and Richard
Lewis for hiring me in April 97 and thereafter offering such interesting and
challenging projects to work on.

I have made some excellent friends at Enron and hope to keep them - I have a
base in London and will probably be visiting Houston soon, so please feel
free to stay in touch!

CONTACT:
E-mail:   citywhizkid@hotmail.com (easy to remember!)
Mobile:   0961 111 192
Home:    020 8877 9741
Address: Apt 213, Compass House, Riverside West, Smugglers Way, Wandsworth,
London SW18

I will be at the Talbot pub tomorrow Friday 27th October from 6pm where I
hope to catch up with you as a final farewell!

Best wishes for the future!

Anjam
x35383


I do not have a problem with this as the process has been approved for other
agency type arrangements. Credit are fully aware of this and will manage the
exposure accordingly.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	04/25/2001 12:52 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.

I never heard back whether you were OK with the "for 3 listed utilities"
being dropped off the "as agent" thing...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 12:51 PM -----

	Samuel Schott
	04/25/2001 12:42 PM

		 To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.

Hey Rhonda,

My understanding is that this record is still on "hold" pending Legal advise.
(Tana Jones)

Please advise.

Samuel

Rhonda L Denton
04/25/2001 11:33 AM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.

Please unlink this CP from Enpower at the end of the day today.  all deals
have been moved to the authorized agent record.  Please let me know when
complete so that I can refresh.


(See attached file: HPLN1129.xls)

 - HPLN1129.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 02:36 PM
---------------------------

"Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com> on 06/30/2000 01:48:28 PM
To: John9375@aol.com, CHMARGAU@aol.com, BLawler875@aol.com,
m.montano@mail.utexas.edu, l.lawler@mail.utexas.edu, cll@prodigy.net,
srhea@acm.org, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: A quiz for Million Mom marchers to consider:

 >Subject: A quiz for Million Mom marchers to consider:
>
>
> >
> > 1. Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer and Barbara Boxer strongly denounce
> > private gun ownership. Their bodyguards; however, carry:
> > A.      Berettas
> > B.      Glocks
> > C.      Garbage can lids
> > D.      Slingshots
> > E.      Very heavy purses
> >
> > 2. You and your baby daughter are awakened in the middle of the night by
> > your estranged, abusive ex-husband. Although you have a restraining
> > order against him, he is drunk and beats down your front door with a
> > crowbar screaming, "If I can't have you, nobody can!" You  should:
> > A.     Call Barbara Boxer.
> > B.     Call 911, and tell them that they should arrive within 30
>seconds.
> > C.     Threaten legal action.
> > D.     Grab a ping-pong paddle.
> > E.      Reason with him (maybe he was an abused child).
> >
> > 3.   Since 1987, 34 states have enacted concealed carry laws. Violent
> > crime decreased in these states and the anticipated "Dodge City" mayhem
> > never materialized. Even critics were surprised. Concealed carry
> > succeeded because:
> > A.      Sunspot activity decreased after 1987.
> > B.      Trigger locks rendered guns inoperative and therefore safe.
> > C.      Sarah Brady scared the crooks away.
> > D.      A healing wave of pacifism swept over the hearts of criminals in
> > these 34 states.
> > E.      Janet Reno said that crime should stop.
> >
> > 4.  Schools, churches, subways, and restaurants have often been
> > assaulted, but rarely military bases, police stations, or shooting
> > clubs. The reason for this is because:
> > A.      The targets aren't sitting or kneeling.
> > B.      VA benefits are lost if you shoot a soldier.
> > C.      You can't enter an army base without bumper stickers.
> > D.      Schools don't threaten felons with detention hall.
> > E.      All of the above.
> >
> > 5.  Logic, reason, and common sense:
> > A.      Are irrelevant if they contradict your feelings.
> > B.      Should not apply to firearms.
> > C.      Defy opinion polls.
> > D.      Pale beside hysteria, fear, and political ambition.
> > E.      All of the above.
> >
> > 6.  Every dictator always disarms his victims, before beginning to
> > annihilate freedom loving people. The reason for this is because:
> > A.      Guns cause crime.
> > B.      Guns cause accidents
> > C.      Guns cause suicides
> > D.      Being defenseless is the only way that mothers can demonstrate
> > their love for their children
> > E.      All of the above
> >
> > "Blaming guns for what happened at Columbine is like blaming spoons for
> > Rosanne for being fat."
> >
> > 20th Century Patriot
> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com