-----Original Message-----
From: 	iPayit<ipayit@Enron.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:07 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	Action Requested:  Past Due Invoice for User: JEFFREY SHANKMAN

Alert!
You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due.  It is critical that you login to iPayit and take immediate action to resolve this invoice.

Remember, you play an important role in ensuring that we pay our vendors on time.

Tip!:  You must login to the system to forward this invoice to another user.

To launch iPayit, click on the link below:
http://iPayit.enron.com
Note:  Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password.

First time iPayit user?  For training materials, click on the link below:
http://sap.enron.com/sap_doclib/user/file_list.asp?cabinet_id=265

Need help?
North America: ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727.
Europe: European Accounts Payable at +44-20-7783-7520.
Asia-Pacific: Sydney Accounts Payable at +61-2-9229-2336


Mmmmmm, stuffed mushrooms!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 9:28 AM
To: katie.trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject:

Okay so, five hours at work and so far no fallout from christmas party
shenanigans!  This is going better that expected.


Attached is a marked up copy of Jan's memo with comments regarding possible
responses on each point.

In addition, I suggest being prepared to describe some affirmative ideas we
think the Governor should support -- just to see what they say.  Below are a
few suggestions that I am working on for my memo to the Board on 2001
legislation.

Fixed Price Contracts
Require the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to establish
criteria for reviewing and approving or rejecting proposed fixed term, fixed
price contracts within 20 days of their submission by an investor-owned
utility.

Demand-Side Management
Require the CPUC to resolve the interruptible tariff issues in a manner that
will make the program workable from customer and reliability perspectives.
(I am not up to speed on the issues associated with this -- only that the
CPUC has industrial customers up in arms.)

Power Plant Siting
Require the California Energy Commission to consider the positive
environmental impacts of proposed projects when analyzing alternatives to
proposed projects, including the &no project8 alternative.  (This has little
affect but makes a point about the CEC process.)

Simplified Interconnection Rules for Preferred Technologies
Require the CPUC to adopt standard, simplified interconnection options for
distributed generation, renewable, and small cogeneration projects.  (A
perverse version of this was in a Peace bill last year.  As proposed, it
applied only to projects that did not sell onto the grid.  When Enron and
cogenerators made clear that they would cause problems if it wasn't changed,
SCE asked to have the whole section deleted.  It was.)

Community Access
Permit cities and/or other political subdivisions of the state to aggregate
their consumers into electricity buying coops by adopting a local ordinance
that gives customers the opportunity to &opt-out8 of the program.  (TURN has
said it intends to sponsor this next year.)

Have fun in the meeting!  Karen

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:46 PM
To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; knorton@mcnallytemple.com; 'John Stout for
Reliant'; 'Curtis Keebler at Reliant'; 'Julie @ Edson'; 'Paula
Hall-Collins'; 'Marty Wilson'; 'Rob Lamkin'; Karen Edson; Bob
Weisenmiller; Sue Mara; Andy Brown; B Brown Andy; Bob Escalante; Greg
Blue; Jack Pigott; Jan Smutny-Jones; Joe Ronan; Karen Denne; Kassandra
Gough; Kristin Vellandi; Lynn Lednicky; McNally Ray; Richard Hyde;
Stephanie-Newell; Tom Ross; Roger Pelote; Richard Hyde; Lynn Lednicky;
cabaker@duke-energy.com
Cc: chudson@iepa.com
Subject: Governors Meeting

Greetings:
Apologies in advance for those of you who have already received this e-mail
but we are having transmission problems and I just wanted to make sure
everyone had this.  Contrary to the message we will not be holding a
conference call.

Have a happy and safe Thanksgiving!

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - Govs meeting KE Notes.doc


Mary,

 I got your email.  Go ahead and get a carpet shampooer.  Make sure it comes
back clean after each use.  (Wade and the tenants.)

 As far as W-2.  I looked up the rules for withholding and social security.
I will call you later today to discuss.

Phillip


I'd transfer to ENA effective 1/1.  If the people have employment agreements, we will need to assign.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davies, Neil
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Cc:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Headcount File
Importance:	High

Amy

Can you find out from Louise/John whether they want to transfer in the ENW/Corp employees not on this list to ENA and consolidate all newco employee under the ENA umbrella prior to the deal going through ? Would suggest we leave them where they are.

Michelle - does this make sense from an acquisition standpoint or should we transfer everyone to ENA ?

Amy can you pull in Anne, Sarah and Tana and check for all of newco/ENA employees as per the most current list. I'm completing the data room this am and info ready for a counterparty

There will be some ENA folks who are not on the newco list

Thanks

Neil

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Davies, Neil
Subject:	RE: Headcount File

Neil -

Jeanie is out today so I will take responsibility of checking all of the gas and trading employees.

Thanks -
Amy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davies, Neil
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Oxley, David; Slone, Jeanie; Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject:	RE: Headcount File

Karen an d I are ommitted as we are ENW employees

Neil

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Slone, Jeanie; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Davies, Neil
Subject:	FW: Headcount File

Please help with below.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, December 14, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie; Scott, Laura; Douglas, Steve H.  (Tax); Oxley, David; Haedicke, Mark E.; Thode, Eric; Tholan, Scott; Deffner, Joseph; Sherman, Cris; Wilson, Garry D.; Mays, Wayne; Kaminski, Vince J; Virgo, Robert
Cc:	Schield, Elaine; Killen, Faith
Subject:	Headcount File

Please review this headcount file, and verify that this is an accurate list of current ENA employees as of today 12/14/01.  Please send changes by 12:00 noon on Monday, 12/17/01 to Elaine Schield.

Thanks for your cooperation,
Sarah Brown

 << File: Total Headcount.xls >>


Our last physical volumes from Wiser was March 2000.
Our last physical volumes from Riceland was July 2001.

KLJ is a producer on Gatherco which flows into Columbia Gas.  Our last month to receive gas from KLJ was November 2001.  We don't know if they have sent Enron a termination letter or not but I do have a deal with KLJ in Sitara (#250668) that goes through Oct 31, 2002.

Wade Price notes:
Germany, Chris says:
k.l.j., Inc is a gather co supplier, do you know if they have terminated their contract with us?
Price, Wade R. says:
I don't know that we received a termination notice from KLJ in the Settlements shop.  No gas was allocated for KLJ from Gatherco from Dec-01 forward.  Riceland has nothing in Unify since July-01 and Wiser has notheing since May-00.
Germany, Chris says:
cool, so all 3 of these are Appalachian producers then correct?
Price, Wade R. says:
KLJ-yes.  Riceland - No (ANR pipe), Wiser - on CGAS (Mar-00 not May), but production was 139000dth, more than a normal appalachian metered production.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicarlo, Louis
Sent:	Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:01 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Gregory, Paul
Subject:	Physical Deal Research

These physical CPs show up as live.  However myself and others are not aware of any activity with these CPs.  Please investigate.  (Any gas taken or delivered?  Last month of activity? Etc.)

CP Short Name		CP Name
KLJ			K.L.J., Inc.
RICELANDPETCOM	Riceland Petroleum Company
WISEROILCOM		Wiser Oil Company, The

Thanks

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Kohli, Sandeep

Phone: (713) 857 6826 (c)
 (713) 965 0593 (h)
 (713) 646 6282 (o)
 (713) 646 6029 (sec)


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic trade confirmation in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
trade confirmation you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-5033976-5010740-X3DPF1NO

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic delivery
for your Datek Online account.  If you wish to stop receiving account
documents via electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by
logging into Datek Online and choosing "Settings" from the
Account Services menu.

For more information please call Customer Support at 1-888-U2-DATEK, or send
email to support@datek.com.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Brokerage Services
Member NASD / SIPC


Thanks for the reminder.  Marie, as it stands now,  am I correct to believe that I am waiting for the following:

1.	Intructions from Carol on who and when to call Credit regarding making contact with Florida Power & Light to forward and discuss a Master Netting Agreement;
2.	Reciept of a New Master Netting Agreement form that addresses the following:
	a.	Automatic dragnet clause as to non-specifically mentioned commodity contracts and future agreements
	b.	Tax language that addresses 10% withholding tax that would otherwise be payable upon netting under the Master Netting Agreement
	c.	Certain other changes Mary thinks are necessary in light of current facts.

In the meantime, could you please forward me a copy of the Issues List as I did not receive one earlier.

Thanks,

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:02 PM
To:	Clark, Morris; Davis, Angela; Del vecchio, Peter; Douglas, Stephen H.; Gray, Barbara N.; Hansen, Leslie; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Jones, Tana; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; McCullough, Travis; Murphy, Harlan; Murray, Julia; Nemec, Gerald; Sager, Elizabeth; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; St. Clair, Carol; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Cc:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	Master Netting Agreement

Just a reminder not to use the form Master Netting Agreement that was attached to the e-mail notification sent yesterday.  You will be receiving a new form later today.

Thanks!

Marie


Per Steve Kean's request, I am forwarding (through office mail) to each of
you some information that I have on comparable worth which is what the
proposed Paycheck Fairness Act  introduced in both the Senate (S.77) and the
House (H.R. 781) is all about.  I have also noticed another act introduced in
the Senate (S.8) entitled "Enhancing Economic Security for America's Working
Families Act" that has buried in it the same wording as the Paycheck Fairness
Act.  I don't know how this happens--I'm sure it is intended!  S.8 also
requests a minimum wage increase and something on family care but it didn't
show when I printed the document.   S.77, H.R. 781 and S.8 can be located at
http://thomas.loc.gov/.  Enter the bill number without the periods (i.e. "S7"
, "HR781", "S8") and click Search.

To the best of my knowledge and drawing from all I have read, the Paycheck
Fairness Act is responding to the supposed wage gap between the sexes.  There
has been much press over the last few years about the huge gap that exists in
pay between men and women.  The government through the EEOC and the OFCCP use
this gap to further justify why they exist - to stamp out discrimination
These agencies would like for us to believe that the gap is the result of
discrimination and ignore other factors such as hours of work, experience and
tenure, years and type of education, interrupted careers (especially for
women during their childbearing years), and industry and occupation--all of
which differ considerably between men and women.   The government tells us
that women earn on an average 25 percent less than their male counterparts
but I have read research where once all the factors are looked at there is
only about 6 percent gap that can not be explained.  I will send you the
article supporting this.

The are two sections that concern me the most in S.77 and H.R. 781--Sec.
8-Collection of Pay information by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission-- which states "Section 709 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (43
U.S.C. 2000e-8) is amended by adding at the end the following: (f) (1) Not
later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, the
Commission shall-- (A) complete a survey of the data that is currently
available to the Federal Government relating to employee pay information for
use in the enforcement of Federal laws prohibiting pay discrimination and,in
consultation with other relevant Federal agencies, identify additional data
collections that will enhance the enforcement of such laws; and (B) based on
the results of the survey and consultations under subparagraph (A), make
rules to provide for the collection of pay information from employers as
described by the sex, race, and national origin of employees.

I'm sure the "other relevant Federal Agencies" will include the OFCCP who we
know have been using the comparable worth methodology (the "Dubray" method)
to force Federal Contractors into making large salary adjustments for women
and minorities in their Glass Ceiling Audits (even though there is no legal
basis to analyze compensation this way).  Many companies have given in to
their strong arm tactics and paid obscene amounts in back pay and equity pay
just to get the OFCCP to go away.  We are one of the few companies that have
refused to agree with them which has resulted in our 1997 Glass Ceiling Audit
being turned over to the Department of Labor's Solicitors Office.

Also, in Sec. 3-Enhanced Enforcement of Equal Pay Requirements, the Secretary
of Labor can establish voluntary guidelines to rate different jobs based on
criteria such as educational requirements, skill requirements, independence,
working conditions, and responsibility.   Market considerations are not
identified as criteria that the Secretary may consider or include. Moreover,
the Secretary would have the authority to issue regulations to implement the
guidelines.  Employers would be encouraged to compare the wages paid to
similarly rated jobs and identify pay disparities between those occupations
dominated by women and those dominated by men.   This would require Enron to
implement a compensation system to accurately monitor the "value" we place on
different jobs.  This would be an administrative nightmare.

 The Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) has published some
"Talking Points" about the Paycheck Fairness Act as below.

SHRM strongly supports the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII) that prohibit gender-based wage discrimination.
However, SHRM opposes S. 77 and H.R. 781, the Paycheck Fairness Act, which
would expand remedies under the Equal Pay Act of 1963 to include unlimited
punitive and compensatory damages.

The Paycheck Fairness Act is designed to advance the concept of comparable
worth through DOL rulemaking. Comparable worth-related legislation advances
the notion of the government, rather than the private market, ultimately
determining wages.

S. 77 and H.R. 781 would lead to unnecessary litigation and backlogs in the
courts.  Congress rejected the theory of comparable worth during the Equal
Pay Act debate.  Moreover, federal courts have rejected comparable worth as a
legal theory under the Equal Pay Act.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act already provides significant remedies for
sex discrimination in employment, including any claim that equal pay is being
denied based on gender.  These remedies include punitive and compensatory
damages (plus lost back pay and jury trials) capped at between $50,000
through $300,000, depending on the size of the employer.

Congress squarely rejected the concept of unlimited damages for employment
discrimination.

Compensation programs should be designed to ensure fair treatment of all
employees, but should be determined by the market and employer needs, not by
the dictates of government or special interest groups.

Because of the complexity of administering, the difficulty of enforcing and
the inefficiency of regulating private-sector compensation practices, SHRM
strongly opposes any efforts to legislate or regulate comparable worth or
"pay equity."

SHRM encourages organizations of all sizes to regularly perform compensation
or job evaluation audits to ensure such systems do not discriminate based on
gender.

Comparable worth requirements set by the government would force employers to
increase pay for many different jobs and occupations while freezing pay for
others, irrespective of business needs and labor market conditions.

If I have missed anything or you need further information or clarification,
please do not hesitate to contact me.  I will keep a watch out in the HR
publications I read and forward on any new information.   I am interested in
what kind of support this proposed law is getting and if it looks like it
will make it this go around or not!   As an HR practitioner I have utilized
SHRM's Government Affairs web-site to email Sen. Hutchison and Sen. Gramm
urging them to oppose the proposed legislation.  If you want a copy of this
let me know.

Thanks!

Felecia Acevedo
ext. 3-9815


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------
From: Sarah Novosel@ENRON on 12/13/2000 04:39 PM CST
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Final FIled Version

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000 05:35 PM -----

	"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com>
	12/13/2000 05:13 PM

		 To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
<Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final FIled Version

The filed version of the comments in the San Diego Gas & Electric matter at
FERC is attached.

 - SANDIEGO.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 08:51 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com>
10/25/2000 05:23 PM

Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne" <JSole@caiso.com>
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice - ISO response to CPUC and AG subpoenas in the inves
tigations of the wholesale electric market and impacts on retail rates

To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

Attached please find a letter from the California Attorney General (AG)
indicating the confidential treatment that will be provided for confidential
data produced by the CA ISO in response to the AG subpoena (circulated to
Market Participants on October 6 and attached herein for your convenience).

Further, the CA ISO is in receipt of an interim order from the California
Public Utilities Commission in its OII 00-08-002, providing for additional
protection for confidential information, including information subject to
the subpoena issued to the CA ISO (circulated to Market Participants on
September 25 and attached herein for your convenience).

Finally, the EOB has requested copies of the ISO operator logs and morning
reports that are responsive to the CPUC subpoena.  These documents would be
subject to the agreement as to confidentiality for confidential information
produced to the EOB that was arrived at this summer (see letter circulated
to Market Participants on September 25 and attached herein for your
convenience)

The CA ISO will proceed with production in response to the AG and CPUC
subpoenas (and provision of responsive logs and morning reports to the EOB)
unless we are informed, no later than noon on Monday October 30, by a Market
Participant that it is taking formal action to seek further protection for
confidential material from the CPUC, the AG or the EOB.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - 10-25caisoconfidential1025.doc
 - 10-6AGSubpoena.pdf
 - 9-25EOB4.pdf
 - 10-25CPUCsubpoena.doc


Li,

Can you forward it to the team.

Vince

Li Sun@ENRON
01/29/2001 11:19 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: EOL competitors

---------------------- Forwarded by Li Sun/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 11:18 AM
---------------------------
From: Drew Ries/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/29/2001 11:15 AM
To: Li Sun/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: EOL competitors

Li,

Globally there are probably over 80 "competitors" to EOL.  None of these
competitors have a meaningful market share.  Some of the names that jump to
mind are the following, but it should be easy to find others by surfing the
web.  Good luck.

Drew

Dynergy Direct
Houston Street
Altra
True Quote
Intercontinental Exchange
eNYMEX
Coral Connect
Koch Energy
epetroleum.com
Red Meteor
Trade Spark
American Petroleum Exchange
Fuel Spot


Come look.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/06/2001 12:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

I specifically told them to put it behind your door.  When the guy got here,
Becky Spencer called me and asked me again where to put it BEHIND THE DOOR.
My god!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/06/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

They put it in the middle of the wall.  Please have them come back and put it
behind my door.

Thanks,

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 02/06/2001 09:41 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

I have put in the request, and someone should hang your white board today.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	02/06/2001 07:51 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi there,

Please get someone to hang my white board behind my door.

Thanks,

Kay


esimien@columbiaenergygroup.com on 09/18/2000 12:43:20 PM
To: " - *chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: August Worksheets

Chris please read my original e-mail to Molly.

Thanks,
---------------------- Forwarded by Ernie Simien/CES/ColumbiaGas on 09/18/2000
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Molly.Sumrow@enron.com on 09/18/2000 12:40:10 PM
Please respond to Molly.Sumrow@enron.com

To: Ernie Simien/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:

Subject: Re: August Worksheets

Hi Ernie.  You probably did not know I am in another group now.  It is even
a different Enron company.  I forwarded your note to Joann Collins.  She
does TCO and can download those files and send them to you.  The
spreadsheet was done by Chris Germany this month.  If you need to talk to
Joann, her number is 853-5610 and her e-mail is joann.collins@enron .com.

I sure enjoyed working with you Ernie!

Molly

esimien@columbiaenergygroup.com on 09/18/2000 11:22:44 AM

To:   " - *molly.sumrow@enron.com" <molly.sumrow@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  August Worksheets

Hi Molly.  It has been a while.  We have been going crazy here.  Getting
claims
for old past due items.

Please send me your August file.

Thanks,


Do you want to print, sign and fax, or shall I take to Janet or someone else
to sign?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:37
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=212
------------------------------------------------------------


Please see my comments to the attached GE TPA which John sent out on May
22nd.  In it Ihave asked John to get Rose Engeldorf's comments on the "Misc
Reps & Warranties" as I am unsure that they can be provided by E-Next as
currently drafted.

I look forward to receiving the next turn with my comments incorporated or an
email sooner if possible addressing the questions I posed therein.  If there
are any questions of me first, please call.


Your memo was well done.  Mark


Hello,

It's the last CATERED DINNER of the semester.  As a special treat the Wells
Fargo room just got its carpet cleaned.  It looks really neat.  If you
wanted you can eat off it, but I don't suggest it.  Plus sitting at a table
is more convenient than having to bend down to the floor to scoop up food.

Anyway, tonight's dinner is called:  DELECTABLE DELIGHTS!

It's a mysterious name, but it's got something for everyone.  I think
you'll like it.  But please, don't drop anything on the clean carpet.

Thanks.

Seung Lee
Evening MBA Program
Haas School of Business


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042512.txt


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be
connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center
South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While
this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services,
this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No
network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual
physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th
floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th
2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT).
Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network
testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at
713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MESSAGING:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

Impact:  Exchange
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:30:00 PM
Outage:  Initiate Failover of Nahou-msmbx01v to unlock backup api
Disruption:
Environments Impacted:  Users on with mailboxes on nahou-msmx01v
Purpose: Ensure backups run successfully
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  Scott Albright  713-345-9381

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 6/2/2001 at  10:00:00 PM thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  10:15:00 PM
Outage:  Exchange server message change
Disruption:  Intermittent Disruption of Service
Environments Impacted:  Corp Exchange users on nahou-msmbx05v
Purpose: To enable the new mailbox over the limit message
Backout:
Contact(s):  Tim Hudson  713-853-9289

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


==>The Vikings have the best record in the NFL and the Rams are in a battle
for
the NFC West title, but only one will survive Sunday's Battle. This Sunday we
will have dozen of props on the game, during half time, player to score first,
margin of victory and much more for this marque matchup.

http//www.sportsbook.com

==>The Hottest New Free Game is Sportsbook.com's Daily Pick 4
Have you made your free play today? Just answer 4 questions on tonights game
and win free cash. We're giving away $60,000 each month and entry is free,
you've
got to play to win.
http://www.sportsbook.com/contest/daily.shtml

==> Friday is Half Price on All Games
Remember Friday is 5% on all games, every week. True parlay odds. 2 team
parlays
pay 2.8 to 1, 3 team parlays pay 6.4 to 1 and 4 team parlays pay 13.5 to 1.

==> TNT, TBS, NBA & Sportsbook.com, a winning combination. All NBA games on
TNT
& TBS are juiceless for first and second half wagering at sportsbook.com.

==> 'bigdaddy' was the lucky better that received a cool $10Gs for placing our
10 millionth sports wager. Every month we give away tens of thousands of
dollars
in free contest winnings, have you tried our FREE Contests Yet?
http//www.sportsbook.com/contest/index.html

10% Cash Bonus on New accounts everyday at sportsbook.com. Bet limits as low
as $10 and deposit limits as low as $20. No sportsbook has a larger selection
of exciting wagers than http//www.sportsbook.com

--------------------------------------------------
This is the sportsbook.com mailing list, to unsubscribe
from this list please visit http//www.sportsbook.com/list/
Please remember when unsubscribing to unsubscribe with the email address you
signed up to sportsbook.com with.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------

Bruce Mills@ENRON
11/30/2000 11:24 AM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000
11:22 AM ---------------------------

"Cantu, Veronica" <vcantu@bcm.tmc.edu> on 11/30/2000 11:05:54 AM
To: "'Adrian Cantu'" <acantu@hotmail.com>, "'Amy_Copes@Dell.com'"
<Amy_Copes@Dell.com>, "'Bruce.Mills@enron.com'" <Bruce.Mills@enron.com>,
"'elena morales'" <elena_morales@excite.com>, "'Francisco Sanchez'"
<hcdpsecretary@hotmail.com>, "'Gina.Kane@AACN.org'" <Gina.Kane@AACN.org>,
"'Kristine Best'" <kristinebest@hotmail.com>, "Liau, Katherine"
<Kliau@www.urol.bcm.tmc.edu>
cc:

Subject: FW: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonietz, Laurie
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:38 AM
To: 'ludmilla'; 'andrea'; Coleman, Angela; Cantu, Veronica; Riezner, Melanie
Subject: NEW elf bowling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm too dumb to figure this version out.  maybe it would help if i read the
rules.....

 - elves2.exe


public release of remaining cong management package appendices


i'm worried the place is too small.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:18 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:

I'm going to call Rene this morning.  Let me know what you think I should
say to him about the walls (ie. painting)

Jai Hawker
Peters & Co. Limited
(403) 261-2259


No autodialer, No BS. To view FREE XXX hardcore pics click here!!!

http://0321.0206.044.034
We bet you haven't seen pix this dirty and nasty!!!

remove   rechele4859382@china.com


I think these are quite good...the missing piece, I would argue, that we need
to include is a talking point on the need for FERC to focus significant
resources on the identification and elimination of market power in
electricity markets and the need to encourage the development of distributed
generation and more effective demand - side response mechanisms , partly in
response to market power concerns. This is a huge issue in  getting wholesale
electricity markets to work effectively, i.e; to create discernable  consumer
welfare benefits.... and we ( Enron ) need to talk about this this issue and
concern and talk about it frequently and w/ the same passion we talk about
the need for open markets.

Linda Robertson
04/04/2001 12:09 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Lay/Skilling Talking Points for Bush Admin Meetings and Calls

Steve, per our conversation yesterday in Houston, what do you think of these
TPs?  To be used by both Ken and Jeff in conversations and meetings with the
Bush Administration.

 - Skilling Talking Points.doc


Travis Prentice - 62


I sent that file to you in error. Please disregard.

Thanks,

Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 03:04
PM ---------------------------

"Kilby, Daniel" <KilbyD@kochind.com> on 12/15/2000 08:45:45 AM
To: "'craig.breslau@enron.com'" <craig.breslau@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Ormet Letter Agreement

Craig, please find attached a rough draft of the letter agreement for the
Ormet Deal. We need get rolling on this so let me know your thoughts on this
and the service request (sent earlier this week) as soon as you can.

Thanks.

 <<Enron-OrmetLetterAgreement.doc>>

 - Enron-OrmetLetterAgreement.doc


Congrats to you too!  I'll see you in February unless you're in London
sooner.  Can't wait to start up the dinner club again!

See you soon.

Beth

Vince J Kaminski
11/01/2000 00:01
To: Beth Perlman/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Congratulations.

Beth,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Torrey:

I am the lawyer in ECT legal responsible for our relationship with the NYMEX
and monitoring our compliance with NYMEX position limits.  Phillipe Travis
tells me you may be able to help him in preparing the reports of our
positions with the option delta factored in.  Thanks very much for your
assistance.

Mark


We are moving ahead with finalizing a Master Netting Agreement that will cover all physical and financial agreements between BNP Paribas and Enron, except for the exchange agreements pertaining to NYMEX and LME trading.  The agreements to be included under this arrangement are listed below.  The intent is to complete the agreement by close of business on Tuesday, November 27.  We have communicated this to Bart Schouest at BNP Paribas and to BNP Paribas' counsel in New York.

1.	ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of  June 28, 1995 between Enron North America Corp., formerly Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp., and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas (as the same may have been or may be amended, restated, supplemented of otherwise modified from time to time, and including all Transactions, schedules, annexes, and confirmations thereunder, collectively).

2.	Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement dated effective as of January 16, 1992 between Enron Corp. and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas.

3.	ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of  February 22, 2000 between Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. and BNP Paribas.

4.	ISDA Master Agreement effective as of April 4, 2000 between Enron Credit Limited and BNP Paribas.

5.	General Terms & Conditions governing transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas.

6.	General Terms & Conditions governing online transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas for the Sale and Purchase for Flat UK Beach Trades.

Please address any questions or concerns to me ASAP.

Regards,

Chip


----- Original Message -----
From: <pmjr1967@yahoo.com>
To: <esaibi@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:03 PM
Subject: Question for seller -- Item #1064413482

> Would you accept $100 for a dozen of these? I can paypal you the funds.
LMK
> --------------------
>
>
> Question from:           pmjr1967
> Title of item:           ENRON Titleist DT Spin Golf Balls Dozen NR!
> Seller:                  esaibi
> Starts:                  Jan-16-02 12:21:11 PST
> Ends:                    Jan-19-02 12:21:11 PST
> Price:                   Starts at $199.00
> To view the item, go to:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1064413482
>
>
>
> Visit eBay, The World's Online Marketplace TM at http://www.ebay.com


Chris Mallory
Deal 512609
Prebon shows price as $165....Enpower has $160.


i don't know.  so you can drive and e-mail and almost hit concrete baracades at the same time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:58 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

why

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:50 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

you need to get a blackberry


Analyst & Associate Networking Happy Hour
Sponsored by Enron Global Markets
Benefiting JDF

Benjy's
2424 Dunstan
Tuesday, October 16, 2001
5:30pm-8:00pm
RSVP - Angie Chappell x51535

Come in costume - prizes awarded!

Every three minutes someone dies from diabetes, the leading cause of kidney failure and adult blindness. Daily injections provide life support, but insulin is not a cure. Help find a cure for this disease and its complications!

Directions:
Route: http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/mqtrip?shared_uid=epb1a8ac46uck8mu&link=btwn/twn-ddir_results_page&event=retrieve_route


(A9900171)

* IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR
    - Attorneys and legal professionals
    - Insurance adjusters, claims managers and fraud investigators
    - Courts and law enforcement agencies
    - Licensed private investigators

* ASSET AND BACKGROUND SEARCHES
    - Locate assets to satisfy judgments and other debts
    - Determine the economic viability of litigation
    - Analyze settlement offers and proposals
    - Find the assets of a decedent
    - Locate missing witnesses, debtors and heirs
    - Collect delinquent spousal and child support

* SEARCHES INCLUDE
    - Bank accounts (100% legal search methods - see below)
    - Investment accounts
    - Safe deposit boxes
    - Real estate
    - Vehicles, watercraft, aircraft
    - Skip-traces
    - Public record information
    - Criminal history
    - Business affiliations

* 100% LEGAL SEARCH METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
    - Conforms fully with the new federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
    - Conforms fully with the Fair Credit Reporting Act
    - Conforms fully with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
    - Some searches require a permissible purpose (see catalog)

* FREE CATALOG
    - In the United States, contact the firm at 561/279-2404
    - Catalog (which is sent to you by fax) provides search
        product descriptions, prices, turn-around-times and
        legal requirements/restrictions
    - Many new features recently added to search packages

///end posting///

---------------------------------------------------------------
If this posting is not of interest, please delete and thank you
for your time.

Remove? For automated removal, do not use 'Reply' function.
Send standard email message, with 'remove' in Subject field to:
findassets@cari.net.my

(Please do not abuse this removal address, otherwise we will be
unable to process remove requests. Thank you, again.)


Attached is the Weekly FERC Electric Report for week ending March 16, 2001.


Hi, Jeff --

It was great to meet you this week while you were in San Diego for the
hearings.  Cathy Van Way and I had a blast catching up on old times and
trying to think of every pun possible that led directly back to electricity.

I know Enron has extensive communications support, but in the future if you
have need on a project or public relations campaign, I hope you'll keep me
in mind.  Although it took me a while to understand the difference between
a megawatt and a megaphone before Rep. Schaefer introduced the first bill,
once I finally "got it" I developed an ability to help the media understand
the issue -- so that misinformation, as experienced in San Diego -- can be
avoided.   I've also maintained excellent contacts with the media covering
electricity and can help with corporate pr as well as issue communications.

As you're well aware, the light won't go out on this issue for a long time
(pun practice).

Best regards,

Dana

Dana Perino
dana@gablegroup.com
619-234-1300 ext. 238


I've found CompareRite to work with long documents.  Plus, these documents
started out as WordPerfect documents and were converted to Word, which I
think creates problems with Word comparisons.  I figure it is a Gates
conspiracy...

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/14/2000 07:33:34 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Blackline

Yours is much better.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:26 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Blackline

Here's the blackline I prepared, so you can see which looks better.

(See attached file: COMPARE6TO5)

Here it is as a Word file, just in case:

(See attached file: COMPARE6TO5.doc)


Most likely this is an offset to our term sale to CES on CGAS. Chris prepares
CES invoices.  I don't know if he is aware of this. Most likely, there is an
offsetting sale that is not in or we need to back off an existing path and
replace with this purchase.

Sandra Dial
03/10/2000 01:33 PM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Columbia Gas of Ohio on CGAS for Jan 00

Stephanie,
Can you change the year from 2001 to 2000 on the deal, please.
Columbia Gas of Ohio, sitara #153863, purchase.

Mark, If you happen to have any info on who Enron sold the gas to (since
we're buying from Col Gas of OH), let  Robert know--meanwhile he's checking
with Robin and Chris on his end so he can path it.

Vic--this is only FYI. Robert's taking the lead on finding out the info he
needs to get this pathed in the system.

Thanks all.

Sandra
x5-7213

---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra Dial/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 01:25
PM ---------------------------

Robert Allwein
03/10/2000 10:25 AM
To: Sandra Dial/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Columbia Gas of Ohio on CGAS for Jan 00

The deal ticket has 2001 on it not 2000. Can you find out who they sold the
gas to. Do you need this pathed and tracked and balanced? - Rob

Sandra Dial
03/10/2000 09:54 AM
To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Columbia Gas of Ohio on CGAS for Jan 00

Robert/Victor,

Can one of you check into this for me, please (you may also be getting a call
from Mark Feldman from Volume)...

Columbia Gas of Ohio, sitara #153863, flow date 1/21/00, 3,575 mm's. The deal
is in sitara; however, I do not see anything nommed, etc in Unify (like the
deal doesn't exist). Can you check on your end to see if there was some sort
of glitch/error. According to Dick Jenkins, he agrees with the counterparty.
Let me know what you find/fix so I can redraft and pay them. Could it be
booked under another pipe? Call me later. Thanks.

S
x5-7213


Looks fine to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Veatch, Stephen; Martens, Donna; Petersen, Keith
Cc:	Porter, Gregory J.; Pryor, Tony; Dornan, Dari
Subject:	Transwestern Red Rock Expansion

	Attached for your review and comments is a draft of a request to FERC to extend the period allowed under the Red Rock certificate for the abandonment and replacement of the compressors at Station 4. My understanding is that we need to request a one year extension as to Station 4 (but not as to the other three compressor stations included in the Red Rock expansion) due to the fact that we haven't fully contracted for all of the capacity authorized by FERC. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks.

 << File: TWFERCExtension.doc >>


Stinson:
Can we do the meeting today at 4:00?


<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

If
 you do not wish to receive email from Bargain Bazaar, please Click Here:

 UNSUBSCRIBE

 Volume
 No. 42
 Friday,
 November 23, 2001
 Price:
 FREE

 <map
 name=main_map><area shape=rect alt="Women + Women" coords=5,19,135,218
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011123_50&e=1736394363&r=u365&d=6&p=1" title="Women + Women"><area
 shape=RECT alt="Men + Women" coords=175,48,306,245
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011123_50&e=1736394363&r=u366&d=6&p=2"><area
 shape=rect alt="Men + Men" coords=340,31,470,222
 href="http://www.m-ul.com/e/c.cgi?j=20011123_50&e=1736394363&r=u367&d=6&p=3" title="Men + Men"></map>


Keep it simple and just buy it off them.  No JV stuff.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Acevedo, Rudy
Subject: RE: NLR & Benton Purchase Power RFP

Is your thought on the Dynegy role to have them contract with Enron, taking their profit in how they price OR enter into some type of joint venture/joint bidding arrangement?  I know you don't know what they might want to do, but I was curious as to your starting position.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rorschach, Reagan
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Kroll, Heather; Mann, Kay; Acevedo, Rudy
Subject: FW: NLR & Benton Purchase Power RFP

Kay, attached is the letter from NLR regarding our proposal.

Summary of the Cities of NLR and Benton, Arkansas deal:

  _____

assist Cities with network transmission service agreements with Entergy
assist with initialization of OASIS, TSIN, and JTSIN transmission reservation accounts
telemetering load from NLR SCADA and Benton's meters to Enron control room
perform load forecasting
manage NLR's Murray Hydro facility to serve NLR load
deliver wholesale energy to match NLR and Benton loads inclusive of losses as an "into Entergy" product
deliver wholesale energy such that network transmission can be used to sink energy to NLR and Benton native loads
provide real time, day ahead, and term trading; scheduling and transmission reservations/services; volume management; settlements; and control room services
arrange for ancillary services related to native load inlcuding Entergy OATT Schedules 1 through 6
provide NLR and Benton with a fixed price for energy and ancillary services through the life of contract
provde NLR and Benton with option to extend agreemetn for 3 additional years.

NLR Issues with Enron Proposal:
  _____

Your price is greater than 15% from the best price offer.  A substantial improvement in price would be necessary to receive further consideration.
You have identified no resources inside of Entergy's control area.  If you can point to resources inside of Entergy's control area you may improve your position
You did not utilize dynamic scheduling for the scheduling of generation to match load.  You may improve your position by offering dynamic scheduling.
The Cities desire a fixed cost over the term of the contract.  You may improve your position by including any increases in the Cities' cost for Network Transmission Service over the term of the contract in your costs.
The Negotiation Committees are alarmed by the recent developments concerning Enron's losses and the downgrading of Enron's securities.  Significant financial assurance would be required before the Negotiating Committee's would further consider Enron.

What We'd Like to Do With Dynegy:

  _____

Provided we can win the project, we'd like to do the following:

name generation to satisfy point #2
use Dynegy base load generation assets to dynamically schedule the NLR and Benton loads
name Dynegy assets as network resources

Note that we have not talked with Dynegy about any of this and any deal would be subject to mutual agreement and negotiation.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

-----Original Message-----
From: Gertsch, Joe [ <mailto:JGertsch@nlrelectric.com>]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: NLR & Benton Purchase Power RFP

Reagan:

Attached is the letter I promised regarding Enron's position relative to the
other proposals.

Joe Gertsch

 <<Enron  LTR.doc>>


Louis,  Please approve a parking subsidy for Nabil Nachawati, a summer law
clerk, in the legal dept.  My RC# is 105659, and the CO# is 0413.  Let me
know if you need any further information.

Gerald Nemec


========================================================
From KHOU-TV's Dr. Neil Frank & Reliant Energy W.A.R.N. :
========================================================
WTNT22 KNHC 250255

TCMAT2

SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO FORECAST/ADVISORY NUMBER   2

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL   AL1701

0300Z SUN NOV 25 2001

..CORRECT TROPICAL STORM TO SUBTROPICAL STORM...

SUBTROPICAL STORM CENTER LOCATED NEAR 31.5N  50.6W AT 25/0300Z

POSITION ACCURATE WITHIN  45 NM

PRESENT MOVEMENT TOWARD THE NORTHWEST OR 320 DEGREES AT   9 KT

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE  990 MB

MAX SUSTAINED WINDS  50 KT WITH GUSTS TO  60 KT.

50 KT.......200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT.......540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

12 FT SEAS..600NE 200SE 400SW 600NW.

WINDS AND SEAS VARY GREATLY IN EACH QUADRANT.  RADII IN NAUTICAL

MILES ARE THE LARGEST RADII EXPECTED ANYWHERE IN THAT QUADRANT.

REPEAT...CENTER LOCATED NEAR 31.5N  50.6W AT 25/0300Z

AT 25/0000Z CENTER WAS LOCATED NEAR 31.2N  50.2W

FORECAST VALID 25/1200Z 32.0N  51.5W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT...200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT...540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

FORECAST VALID 26/0000Z 32.5N  52.9W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT...200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT...540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

FORECAST VALID 26/1200Z 32.8N  54.2W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT...200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT...540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

REQUEST FOR 3 HOURLY SHIP REPORTS WITHIN 300 MILES OF 31.5N  50.6W

EXTENDED OUTLOOK...USE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY...ERRORS MAY BE LARGE

OUTLOOK VALID 27/0000Z 33.0N  55.5W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT...200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT...540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

OUTLOOK VALID 28/0000Z 33.0N  57.0W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT...200NE  60SE  60SW 200NW.

34 KT...540NE  90SE  90SW 500NW.

NEXT ADVISORY AT 25/0900Z

FORECASTER BEVEN

WWWW
========================================================
This message is brought to you by KHOU-TV 11/Reliant Energy W.A.R.N.
For instant weather on the web or to learn more about our Wide Area Radar
Net (W.A.R.N) visit our website at:  http://www.khou.com
=======================================================

Need to change you weather bulletin settings, going on vacation, or
wish to unsubscribe? Click the link below to do so.

http://khou.weatherwarn.net/wxwarn/index.asp?stn=KHOU

TROUBLE UNSUBSCRIBING OR SUBSCRIBING?
FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR HELP! :
http://khou.com/newwxwarn/troubleshooting.htm

WeatherWarn 2000
========================================================


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: DAVE KEARNS
on NOVELL NETWARE
10/16/01 - Today's focus: Gadgets a go-go

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Useful utilities at Gadget Factory
* Links related to Novell NetWare
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by Novell

With NetWare 6, your network is just a browser away.

You've read all the great reviews about how you can access your
file, print and other storage resources from any browser
anywhere with NetWare6. To get updated product information and
downloads, visit http://nww1.com/go/3421906a.html
_______________________________________________________________
SO, WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Give us your opinion on 5 different banner advertisements
and enter to win $500! Take the Banner Concepts survey at
http://www.rresults.com/bannerconcept/index.cgi

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Gadgets a go-go

By Dave Kearns

We've talked about helpful tools and utilities lately, and a
number of readers drew my attention to The Gadget Factory. Now,
maybe I'm the last person in the world to have heard of it -
but if it is new to you too, then you need to check it out as
soon as you can.

The Gadget Factory (http://www.gadgetfactory.com) is an
Australian operation that produces shareware network utilities
for both NetWare- and Windows-based networks. All of the
Factory's products are available as evaluation copies, which
can be turned into full versions by registration (and paying a
small fee, typically US$20 or $25 for a single-user version).

As I mentioned in last week's "Useful utilities" newsletter,
I really like tools that do one thing and do it well. Gadget
Factory has a number of tools that fit that description. I
really like tools that do one thing and do it well (see:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/2001/01047621.html).

One good example is DSpace. DSpace lets network managers find
disk space usage problems quickly and easily. In a NetWare 3.x
environment, DSpace will list all the users in the Bindery,
along with how much space they are using, while in an Novell
Directory Services tree you can select any part of the tree and
DSpace will report all the users from that point down. DSpace
can be used on NetWare 5.x NSS volumes, as well as traditional
volumes.

The Factory's latest utility is NWEXPLORE, a Windows Explorer
style program designed to provide specific NetWare information
quickly and easily. It can display the total size of
directories without having to count each file and subdirectory.
Trustee assignments can be quickly and easily viewed, granted
and adjusted. Directory quotas also can be viewed and modified.

There are a half dozen other utilities that are useful to at
least some of you - such as WhoHasIt, which quickly shows you
which users have a particular file open. Check out the entire
collection. Download the evaluations and try them on your
network - I'll bet there's at least one you'll want to buy.

News flash: In a Novell NetWare newsletter that was sent
earlier this month and headlined "Is NetWare safe from would-
be hackers?" we discussed how NetWare could be open to
attacks. In this week's issue of Network World, senior editor
Deni Connor, delves deeper into this subject and details the
best practices for securing your network. You can read her
article at
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2001/126214_10-15-2001.html

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Dave Kearns:

Dave Kearns is the Word Wrangler for Virtual Quill, a writing
agency serving the computer and networking industries. If
your target customer doesn't know your product, doesn't know
its uses and doesn't know he needs it, he's not going to buy
it. From books to reviews, marketing to manuals, VQ can help
you and your business. Virtual Quill - "words to sell by..."
Find out more at: http://www.vquill.com/, or by e-mail at
mailto:info@vquill.com.
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Beta testers give Novell's NetWare 6 positive marks
Network World, 10/15/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2001/126256_10-15-2001.html

Breaking Novell and NetWare news, updated daily:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/financial/novell.html

Archive of the Novell NetWare newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Audio Primers

Are you behind on the basics of technologies such as ATM, IP
Multicast and VPNs? Check out our library of audio primers -
quick explanations of networking topics and technologies,
including IPv6, SANs and DSL vs. cable. These less-than-10-
minute primers will not only explain how these technologies
work, but they'll also show you through slides and diagrams.
http://www.nwfusion.com/primers/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


Subject: Energy Market Report - 01/30/02

Energy Market Report
Wednesday, January 30, 2002

*See attached pdf file.
__________________________________________________________
Western Pre-Scheduled Firm Electricity Prices($/MWh)
January 30, 2002 for January 31, 2002

Peak(Heavy)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     18.90      0.00     20.50      1.00
Mid-Columbia      18.90      0.00     20.50      1.00
COB               21.25      0.25     22.95      0.95
N. California     23.50      0.00     25.25      1.00
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     23.75      0.75     25.50      0.50
Mead              25.00      0.50     26.25     -0.25
Palo Verde        23.00     -0.50     26.00      0.50
Inland SW         23.00     -0.50     26.25     -0.25
4-Corners         23.75      0.75     26.75      1.50
Central Rockies   20.75      0.25     23.50      0.50
__________________________________________________________
Off-Peak(Light)
                   Low      Change     High     Change
NW/N. Rockies     17.75      0.75     18.75     -0.25
Mid-Columbia      17.75      0.75     18.75     -0.25
COB               18.00      0.25     19.50      0.75
N. California     19.00      0.75     21.00      1.25
Midway/Sylmar       NA        NA        NA        NA
S. California     18.50      0.75     21.00      0.50
Mead              18.25      1.25     21.00      2.00
Palo Verde        14.75      0.00     17.00      0.50
Inland SW         14.75      0.00     21.00      2.00
4-Corners         15.00      0.00     17.00      1.00
Central Rockies   13.00      1.00     14.50      0.75
_________________________________________________________
Going Short for the Shortest Month

Day-ahead electricity prices in the Western U.S. were mostly higher
Wednesday on continued cold weather.  Some traders also said that rising
spot gas prices lent support to the daily power market.  "The worst of this
cold snap appears to be over, but the market will likely take a day or so to
react," believed one marketer.  According to Weather Derivatives, heating
demand throughout the West was forecast to fall to below-normal levels over
the coming weekend, and the latest six-to-ten from the NWS was calling for
mostly normal temperatures from February 5 through 9.  February contracts
were trading a buck or two below the dailies at all of the major Western
hubs on Wednesday.  "Historically, February has been a lighter load month
than January, and that's why we're heading into the new month with a short
position," said one matter-of-fact trader.  In other industry news,
Wednesday's AGA inventory report showed that U.S. gas stocks fell 111 bcf
last week, right in line with most industry estimates.  Total U.S.
inventories of 2.294 tcf were still 1.053 tcf, or 85 percent, above last
year.  Of the 111 bcf taken out of storage last week, 19 were drawn in the
Western Consuming region.  Total inventories in the West stood at 360 bcf,
or 71 percent of full.  Western stocks were at 222 bcf the same week a year
ago, and have averaged 265 bcf over the past five years.

Peak power prices in the Northwest rose marginally for Thursday delivery,
despite a general sense that the worst of the cold snap was over.  "We were
a little surprised to see prices rise today because it is supposed to begin
warming up, and we are fairly bearish heading into February," said one
Washington-based trader.  Heating demand in the region was forecast to
steadily drop from 119 percent of normal on Thursday, to 99 percent of
normal on February 6.  Flow forecasts for Chief Joseph were revised upward
again on Wednesday, coming in at 115 kcfs Thursday, 110 kcfs Friday, 80 kcfs
Saturday, 65 kcfs Sunday, 110 kcfs Monday and Tuesday, and 105 kcfs next
Wednesday.  In unit news, Bridger #4 (520 MW) was shut Wednesday morning due
to a plugged boiler.  While no ETR was given for the Wyoming-based unit,
sources familiar with thermal plants said such a problem is usually fixed in
48 hours or less.  While Colstrip #3 (700 MW) remained down with no official
ETR, some parties believed it would not return until February 9.

Amid continued below-normal forecasts for Thursday and stronger natural gas
values at the SoCal border, day-ahead electricity prices for delivery on the
last day of January gained ground in the Golden State.  Traders noted that
spot gas and light load prices were particularly strong.  "I was surprised
that gas was strong today.  The forecasts are warming gradually though, so
gas should start to ease soon and electricity prices should fall off," said
one California trader.  Prices at COB settled higher on Wednesday, with
heavy load deals heard between 21.25 and 22.95$/MWh and light load changing
hands from 18 to 19.5.  "We saw an opportunity to make some money at COB
today," said one Western dealer.  February COB lingered about 2$/MWh cheaper
than the dailies, with peak products heard trading near 20$/MWh and off-peak
pieces reportedly going through from 16.75 to 16.95$/MWh.  Similarly,
front-month deals at NP15 were heard about a dollar cheaper than the
dailies, near 22.75$/MWh for heavy load goods.  CAISO reported little change
in the overall generation landscape on Wednesday, with a difference of less
than 100 MW off-line to a day ago.  Of note, San Luis (326 MW) exited the
grid for planned maintenance.  Thursday temperatures were expected to reach
highs in the low-60s at southern load centers, and about 50 degrees at
mid-state.  The five-day forecast called for gradual warming, with
temperatures still expected to be about four degrees below normal on Sunday.
The most current six-to-ten predicted normal temperatures from February 5 to
9.

While peak power prices in the Southwest dipped by 50 cents on both the high
and low ends, the bulk of deals were done at slightly higher levels than on
the previous day.  Continued cold weather and rising spot gas values were
the main factors lending support to the dailies on Wednesday.  Starting on
Friday, heating demand in the desert region was forecast to drop sharply,
dipping to below-normal levels by February 3.  Peak electricity prices at
Palo Verde ranged from 23$/MWh early, to a late-session high of 26$/MWh,
while February contracts were heard around the 21.65$/MWh mark.  Light load
goods for Thursday delivery traded from 14.75 to 17$/MWh, while February off
peak was seeing action near the 14.7$/MWh level.  There were no new outages
of consequence to report in the Southwest on Wednesday, but looking further
ahead, Palo Verde #2 (1,270 MW) was scheduled to shut for spring maintenance
from March 16 through April 20.  Weather forecasts called for gradual
warming over the coming weekend, and the latest six-to-ten from the NWS was
predicting normal temperatures from February 5 through 9.

Patrick O'Neill and Jessie Norris
_________________________________________________________

Western Generating Unit Outages

Current                            Begins          Ends          Reason
CAISO units <250/6390 total          NA             NA
planned/unplanned*
Alamitos #3/320/gas               26-Jan-02         ?            planned
Alamitos #6/480/gas               20-Jan-02         ?            planned
Big Creek Project/1020/hydro      28-Jan-02         ?        @710MW, planned
Bridger #4/520/coal               30-Jan-02     1-Feb-02         repairs*
Colstrip #3/700/coal              11-Jan-02         ?            repairs
Corondado #1/395/coal             25-Jan-02     29-Jan-02        tube leak
Encina #4/303/gas                 12-Jan-02         ?            unplanned
Etiwanda #4/320/gas               21-Jan-02         ?            planned
Four Corners #5                   09-Jan-02     14-Mar-02        maintenance
Grand Coulee #19/600/hydro        10-Dec-01       March          repairs
Haynes #6/341/gas                 07-Jan-02         ?            planned
Helms PGP #2/407/hydro            01-Oct-01         ?            planned
Hyatt/Thermalito/933/hydro        02-Oct-01         ?      @665 MW,
unplanned
Moss Landing #7/739/gas           29-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #1/725/gas           28-Dec-01         ?            planned
Ormond Beach #2/750/gas           05-Oct-01         ?      @350 MW,
unplanned
Pittsburg #6/317/gas              22-Nov-01         ?            planned
San Luis PGP/326/hydro            30-Jan-02         ?            planned*
Scattergood #3/445/gas            22-Jan-02         ?            maintenance

Future
Navajo #2/750/coal                02-Feb-02     25-Feb-02        maintenance
Palo Verde #2/1270/nuclear        16-Mar-02     20-Apr-02
maintenance*

For unit owners refer to pdf version.
*Indicates a change from previous EMR.
______________________________________________________________________

Eastern Markets Pre-Scheduled Firm Power Prices ($/MWh)

January 30, 2002 for January 31, 2002

Peak (Heavy) in $/MWh
                 Low     Change   High      Change
Into Cinergy    16.00    -1.00    18.50     -0.80
Western PJM     21.20     0.20    22.20      0.70
Into Entergy    16.00     1.00    17.50      0.35
Into TVA        16.00     0.25    18.00      1.25
ERCOT           18.50     1.00    19.25     -0.15
___________________________________________________________
Amid expectations of continued warm weather through Friday and a natural gas
storage report within industry estimates, spot electricity prices were
mostly steady across the Eastern Interconnect on Wednesday.  Saturday
predictions called for below-normal temperatures, a break in the bearish
weather pattern that has been depressing demand and prices for much of
January.  The AGA weekly natural gas storage report listed a draw of 111
bcf.  NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures were mixed, with March picking up
1.3 cents to close at 2.08$/mmBtu, while April slipped 0.3 cent to end the
day at 2.147$/mmBtu.

While revised loads and forecasts met with skepticism from traders in the
Mid-Atlantic on Wednesday, day-ahead electricity prices climbed slightly
higher.  "Loads and temperatures were revised upwards today.  There's
supposed to be some colder weather for the weekend, but bullish forecasts
have been pushed back all month, so we'll see if the cold actually
materializes this time," commented one PJM player with a wait-and-see
attitude.  Western PJM goods for Thursday delivery changed hands between
21.2 and 22.2$/MWh, with the bulk of deals done around 21.6$/MWh.  LMPs
gradually increased from 09:00 through 11:30 EST reaching a high of 44$/MWh,
but averaged only 20.17$/MWh through 15:00 EST.  In unit news, sources said
Keystone #2 (850 MW) returned to the grid on Wednesday, back from a two-day
maintenance outage.  High temperatures were expected in the upper-40s to
low-50s on Thursday, with overnight lows in the 35 to 42-degree range.  The
latest six-to-ten called for above-normal temperatures from February 5 to 9.

Peak power prices settled lower in the Midwest on Thursday, as continued
bearish fundamentals took their toll on the ECAR market.  Into Cinergy
pieces were bought and sold between 16 and 18.5$/MWh, with the low end
reached in late trade.  No new outages were reported on Thursday, although
traders continued to speculate that many marginal units were off-line for
load following.  Temperatures were predicted to be slightly warmer on
Thursday.  However, the mercury was expected to drop about 15 degrees on
Friday.  The most current six-to-ten predicted above-normal temperatures
from February 5 to 9.

With stronger than expected natural gas values, heavy load energy costs
edged higher in the Southeast on Thursday.  "Prices were bouncing around
quite a bit today.  It was hard to figure out where things were," commented
one Entergy dealer.  Other sources said spring maintenance would start to
affect the market soon, as operators push repairs forward in light of low
prices and warm weather.  Into Entergy trades were heard between 16 and
17.5$/MWh, mostly in the 16s, while February changed hands from 18.35 to
18.5$/MWh.  Texas power remained steady, firming up a buck on the low end.
The bulk of Into TVA deals were done with a 17 handle, but early trades were
heard as low as 16$/MWh.  The updated six-to-ten called for mostly normal
conditions in SERC and Texas from February 5 to 9.
___________________________________________________________

California ISO Congestion Index in $/MWh

                         Path                 Peak   Off-peak
for 31-Jan-02         NW1 to NP15             0.00     0.00
                      NW3 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      AZ3 to SP15             0.00    25.24
                      LC1 to SP15             0.00     0.00
                      SP15 to NP15            0.00     0.00

OTC Forward Peak Electricity Contracts in $/MWh

                    Mid-C              PV              SP-15
                Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask      Bid      Ask
BOM              NA       NA       NA       NA       NA       NA
February       16.75    18.25    21.50    22.50    22.50    23.50
March          15.00    16.50    20.50    21.50    21.50    22.50
April          15.25    16.75    21.75    22.75      NA       NA
Q2 '02         15.50    17.00    24.00    25.00    23.50    24.50
Q3 '02         28.50    30.00    37.00    38.00    36.25    37.25
Q4 '02         27.00    28.50    27.00    28.00    28.50    29.50
Q1 '03         27.00    28.50      NA       NA     29.50    30.50
Cal '03        28.50    30.00    32.50    33.50    34.25    35.25

Represents the most recent bid/ask spread obtainable
by the Energy Market Report.

Alberta Power Pool Index (C$/MWh)

                    Peak(14)   Peak(16)   Off-Peak    Flat     Change
for  29-Jan-02       56.99      53.91      17.53      42.69    12.89

BPA's Offer for 02/01/02 and 02/02/02.

Hours        Amount          NW delivered        COB/NOB delivered
7-22         200MW           Market Price*          Market Price*

*Market price will be determined at time of request.

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures in $/mmBtu

                 Close        Change
        Mar      2.080         0.013
        Apr      2.147        -0.003

Natural Gas Spot Prices in $/mmBtu

                  Low          High
Sumas             2.03         2.08
So. Cal Border    2.14         2.19
San Juan          1.99         2.04
__________________________________________________________

Economic Insight, Inc. - 3004 SW First, Portland, Oregon 97201,
Telephone (503) 222-2425, Internet e-mail emr@econ.com -
Copyright, Economic Insight, Inc. 2002.


Kay, please read this memo...Because you will be working with the originators
and will be the first lawyer to know when the condition of the orders is
filled you are probably the right person to blow the whistle for the 13D
filing...Let me know if you think otherwise
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 11:09 AM -----

	"Scott Miller" <smiller@bracepatt.com>
	10/05/2000 02:17 PM

		 To: <dan.lyons@enron.com>
		 cc: "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com>
		 Subject: FuelCell Schedule 13d Memo

Attached is the memo regarding the Schedule 13D filing requirements in
connection with the FuelCell transaction.

Please call me at (713) 221-1131 with your questions.

Thanks.
Scott

 - 13d Memo.pdf


Per your request.

Is the contract supposed to be an off balance sheet contract?  I'm supposed
to be working on the changes necessary to make this one 97-10 compliant, but
I haven't done it yet.  Maybe you will beat me to it, which is fine by me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 12:00
PM ---------------------------

John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com on 10/09/2000 05:41:13 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Form contract plus exhibits, per request
---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 10/09/2000 05:40 PM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg
09/21/2000 01:57 PM

To:   Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G
      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto
      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K
      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie
      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christen
it officially "FORM 2000 - Rev. 00",clean and compared. John R will need to
take this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisis
applications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as "Form 2000" I
woanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuning
from  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resoluton
materials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.
Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty up
format and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it next
time.

You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was to
revise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibits
withbaited breath.

Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.

Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me.

(See attached file: ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc)

(See attached file: ENRON EPC - 0921 REV0-1 CMP.DOC)

 - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc
 - ENRON EPC - 0921 REV0-1 CMP.DOC


Jeff Donahue heads up the Corp. Development group for ENA, which Don Miller
and I work in.  Jeff is Don's supervisor and Don is mine.  I have been with
this group since around May.  Thanks for the quick action with this.
Regards,
Ben


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2001 08:24 AM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	05/29/2001 08:13 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Enron Credit Inc.

Sara,
Please see attached from Bear Stearns.

 ----- Forwarded by Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 08:10 AM -----

	"Bruegel, Michael (Exchange)" <mbruegel@bear.com>
	05/29/2001 07:12 AM

		 To: "'Stephanie.Panus@enron.com'" <Stephanie.Panus@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Enron Credit Inc.

Stephanie,

I need a bank reference and the approximate net worth and income for Enron
Credit
so that I may complete the required paperwork for the account.  Would you
mind
emailing that to me today?

Thanks,

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From:   Stephanie.Panus@enron.com [SMTP:Stephanie.Panus@enron.com]
> Sent:   Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:37 AM
> To:   mbruegel@bear.com
> Subject:   Enron Credit Inc.
>
> .Mike,
> Can you send me your address for mailing the W-9 form for Enron Credit
> Inc.?
>
> Thanks,
> Stephanie Panus

#****************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


For whatever reason, listserv does not appear to have forwarded the
attachments from the prior email (transmittal letter, summary of testimony,
AEP-2, AEP-8, AEP-10, and certificate of service).  This is a second
attempt.  My apologies if it also doesn't work this time.


Start Date: 12/22/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


One last version:

Apologies for the multiple versions.

Tyrell


The Senate did not take up the SCE MOU prior to adjourning.  All Assembly
bills which passed out of their house of origin but were not heard in the
Senate are automatically held, and all Senate bills which were amended in
the Assembly but needed to go back to the Senate for concurrence are
automatically held.  Those bills include, among others:

ABX2 2 (Corbett) Windfall profits tax
SBX2 1 (Soto/Scott) Windfall profits tax
SBX2 78 (Polanco) SCE MOU
ABX2 65 (Cardoza) Market power
SBX2 27 (Bowen) Direct access
SBX2 39 (Speier) CPUC regulatory expansion
SB 532 (Sher) Renewable portfolio standard
AB 57 (Wright) CPUC reasonableness review

Governor Davis issued the following statement in response to the Senate's
failure to pass the MOU.  This statement was issued prior to adjournment and
Senator Burton indicated that he may not be willing to comply with the
Governor's request for a third special session, however this is subject to
change.  If a third special session is called, the above-referenced bills
could be reactivated:

GOVERNOR DAVIS COMMENTS ON FAILURE OF SENATE TO APPROVE EDISON LEGISLATION

Will Call 3rd Special Session to Keep Edison from Bankruptcy

SACRAMENTO

Governor Gray Davis made the following comments after legislation designed
to restore Southern California Edison to creditworthiness failed to win
approval in the California State Senate.

"I am proud of the work done by the Assembly to get the State out of the
business of buying electricity by restoring Edison to creditworthiness.
Unfortunately, however, the Senate has not gotten the job done.

"It is critical to keep Edison solvent so that we do not lose 3,000
Megawatts of power from renewable energy and small power producers. We
worked hard to bring this energy, which was crucial in avoiding blackouts,
back on-line earlier this summer.

"I will call a Third Extraordinary Session, which will begin in
approximately two weeks, so that Edison can avoid bankruptcy. Edison has
assured me that it will not seek bankruptcy and that it believes that its
creditors will continue to show restraint."

###


Remember Me?  I'm the one who loved you so much that I gave my very best at
raising you. And now I'm missing you so much. Lacy & I can't  understand why
you don't call to check on us & just to talk a while--it doesn't count that
Tonya calls--I didn't raise her.We want to hear your voice every once in a
while.  I know you work a lot, but you used to find time once a week.And
that's no excuse. You can schedule in a call to us.  We're still your family
too.  We love you, Ma
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


looking at it right now.


Yes I did receive them.  Thanks my sugar, I love you.

The Pigs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Angelica Paez" <ampaez@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:43 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	Re:

Hey pigs.  I did send you the photos.  Let me know if you don't get them.
Love you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Griffith, John" <John.Griffith@ENRON.com>
To: <ampaez@earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:07 AM

Hey sugar how are doing?  I hope you are feeling better.  Please let me know
if I can do anything for you.  I love and miss you.  Call me or email me if
you need anything.

The Pigs

PS  Sugar, send me the picture of me with the headphones if you get a
chance.  Thanks.-

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


When did Joe graduate from Mr. to "senior"?

----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Wollam
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 4:15 PM
To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; john.chambers@bisys.com; brianc@saltgrass.com
Subject: are you all dead?

What's the deal. No traffic all week. Makes coming to work really lame.

Here's something to talk about. Karnes City!!! Like it is time to cut checks
again and mail them to the opielas before they call me and hit me up for a
raise on our rent.

John:Last year looks like the break down was as follows: you wrote a ckedk
to Rancho Grande Trust for 2,600 and collected from Mark and Matt.
I wrote one for 900 and collected from pig, shet, smack, hudge and senior
saftey.

SO Brian, Chet, Chad, Hudge and Joe need to cut me a check for 150 a piece
and mail it to my office 815 walker #1447 H/T 77002.

If you are not interested in getting back on, let me know so I can fill your
spot.

John, mail your check and I will send off with mine and contract for emerick

KCLN

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Sorry, I arrive on Continental 1505 at 7:31 p.m. and I leave on Sunday at
11:30 p.m. on Continental.


Here are the latest!!!  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000 02:19
PM ---------------------------

Trey Cash@ENRON
09/04/2000 10:20 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pictures of Cameron


Guess we might want to lob this one in to Delta, just for fun.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 09:57
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/20/2001 09:56 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Delta assignment and assumption

Hi there,

Here's the assignment and assumption agreement with the GE consent included.
Please let me know if you have any comments.

Thanks,

Kay

PS.  In discussing the mechanism to move the turbines, it seemed that it
would work ok to assign the turbines out of the AIP.  I can't find a flaw
with that approach.


Kay:

Enclosed is a revised draft of the Enron North America form of
Confidentiality Agreement.  We have customized the form to specifically
reference the subject transaction and have added new paragraphs 2 and 7 to
cover items addressed in the master agreement.  If you have any questions or
comments, please let me know.   Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure:    128705v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2rb501!.DOC