Print Sale Think presents!  Today (12/4) you can take advantage of the Rice
University Art Department's Annual Print Sale!
 From 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., you may visit Room 201 at Sewall Hall on the
Rice campus.  Available items will include
 etchings and lithographs by Rice University students and faculty, as well as
prints from TEMBO Studios, Flatbed
 Press-Austin, and the University of Houston printmaking students.  Artists
Services will be present to assist with
 your framing needs and all proceeds benefit the art departments of Rice
University and the University of Houston.

Holiday Party at The Museum of Fine Arts Houston invites all Enron employees
to the 14th Annual Corporate Partners Holiday
the MFA! Party to celebrate the partnership of business and the arts.  Stroll
through exhibitions, sample a selection of delicious
 desserts, and enjoy festive holiday entertainment with your family.  Create
your own holiday craft and have a keepsake
 photograph taken of you and your family!  RSVP at 713-639-7585 and mark your
calendars for:

 Tuesday, December 12
 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
 The Museum of Fine Arts - Caroline Wiess Law Building
 1001 Bissonnet

Galleryfurniture.com Enron is a proud sponsor of the Galleryfurniture.com
Bowl!  Come out and witness the bowl fever as it hits Houston
Bowl! on December 27 at the Houston Astrodome.  Come watch the Big XII
Conference face off against Conference
 USA.  All proceeds from ticket sales will go to AIDS Foundation Houston
(AFH) Investment of a Lifetime program,
 which benefits Houstonians with life threatening illnesses.  For more
information contact Greg Grissom at
 ext. 58741.

Vision Fair  SEARCH is having a Vision Fair every day this week from 8:00
a.m.-noon and needs volunteers for the morning
Volunteers! to take information from clients.  No previous screening
experience is necessary.  If interested contact Stefani Harris at
sharris@searchproject.org.

Texas Children's The Department of Social Work at Texas Children's Hospital
is looking for individuals, families, or departments that
Hospital Sponsorship would be interested in sponsoring needy
families/children for the holiday season.  If you would like to sponsor a
family,
 contact Veronique Vaillancourt at vsvailla@texaschildrenshospital.org or at
832-824-1967.

Enron Kids Gift It's time to bring in the wonderful gifts for your special
Burrus Elementary student.  Gift dropoff will occur at the Enron
Drop-off Building Lobby on December 4-8, from 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.  To
volunteer with the Gift Drop-off, contact Geneva
 Davis (ext. 35517) or Lesli Campbell (ext. 35983).

Enron Kids Vans will be provided to transport sponsors beginning at 10:00
a.m. in front of the Enron Building - no reservations
Holiday Party! required, first come first served.  If you are on a tight
schedule that day, you may want to drive or carpool with friends to
 the school.  Maps and directions will be available at the Gift Drop-off
tables this week in the lobby.

Blood Drive Over 23,040 people need blood each day...You can help by donating
blood at the Enron Blood Drive
 on Thursday, December 7, from 7am-4pm in EB5C2.  Contact the Health Center
at ext. 3-6100 to schedule an
 appointment.  Walk-ins are welcome!

Flu Vaccine If you would like a flu shot, please email
Health_Center@enron.com.  You will be notified by email when the
Update vaccine is available.


Attached is the detail for Park N Ride billing for February, 2001. The summary of charges is as follows:


Just some shocking news about Enron's fundraising stars.  Would you believe
this?

 Dan Lyons -  $8810
He's not too far from doubling what he raised last year, and he has three
weeks to go.

Ray Sylvester - $6000

Jordan Hunter - $4500
Another huge increase over last year

I hope this is incentive for all of us to get cracking - we have a larger
goal this year - $350,000, but I know we can do it.  I know there are more
good stories out there in the pledging jungle, so shoot me a note and let me
know how you're doing.

I want to tell you about a new friend of mine.  I met her just last weekend.
She has MS, diagnosed in 1996.  She walks very slowly with a cane and needed
help negotiating her way across a thin throw rug on the floor.  When she
found out about our bike ride she pledged $500 to me and let me know how
important this activity is to her.  Research is very important, client
services to MS patients are very important - giving them hope is very
important, and that's what we do when we're out there raising money for their
future.

My new friend asked me to pass along
 to each and every one of you her very grateful appreciation for all you
do.

If you have any fundraising questions, or I can help you in any way - please
give me a call at 713-646-6569.


Matt,

Long time no  hear, hope you're doing fine at the new company. Sorry to bother you  with this issue again since I know Leo Sommaripa has contacted you  already, so I'll be brief and to the point.

We have been  trying to save a copy of the Database on a CD-R so that we can give it to the  client for their reference but some issues have come up which have to do with  programming. Our intention is for the client to keep the database in the CD and  to be able to access all the features in it so that there is no need for them to  copy it unto a hard drive and possibly modify the data.  Since by saving it unto a CD makes the database  read-only, there's no problem with keeping the data on the disk intact, and  we're even working on a disclaimer to paste on the database.

The problem is  that by making it into a read-only file, some commands have become disabled.  Specifically, the buttons on the review form that access the compliance,  operations, equipment, and staffing forms are not available through the  read-only format. I ventured into the programming codes for the commands and  found the following string on all four buttons:

DoCmd.DoMenuItem acFormBar, acRecordsMenu,  acSaveRecord, , acMenuVer70

I temporarily  deleted that line from the programming codes for all four and so far have not  had any problems with accessing all levels of the database in the CD. Now, I do  not know exactly what that string does to the database but would much rather  find a safer alternative if possible or at least know that the string is  not a critical part of the process. If this is something that can be answered  right off the bat I'd appreciate it, I realize that this is not a priority  anymore so if its something that will consume  a extended period of time,  let me know and I will continue seraching through other  channels.

I guess this  wasn't brief after all and I appreciate the time and effort. I can be  emailed or I can make the arrangements to call you, whatever's better for  you.

JCP

Juan Carlos P?rez Bofill, ME
Environmental Engineer
Vincenty, Heres & Lauria
P.O. Box 13455
San Juan, PR 00908-3455
(787)722-4646
(787)723-0232 (fax)


[IMAGE]? So you want Oh Fo picks well check these out.[IMAGE][IMAGE]At Jim
Wallace wedding[IMAGE]In front of the Beta  credenza[IMAGE][IMAGE]
"Elton  Rob"??????????????????????????????????????  Vince, Tocks,& Snider
Hell Week
 - C.DTF


Benjamin-

Attached is the latest version with revised numbers for Pepco.  Thanks.

Rishi

 <<enron comp.doc>>

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - enron comp.doc


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/22/00 03:23 PM -----

	service@zanybrainy.com
	11/22/00 03:14 PM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Your ZanyBrainy.com Order Number 5797310412

Dear Valued Customer,

Thank you for your order!

Your order number is: 5797310412.

Below, you'll find additional order information. We'll let
you know by email as soon as your order items ship.

Shipment 1 -------------------------------------------------

Send to:

Christie Plauche
4265 Long Leaf Drive
Melbourne
Florida
32940

Item(s):

Magic Bear Drawing Board
1 @ $12.99
= $12.99

Mega Screen
1 @ $29.99
= $29.99

Item(s) Subtotal = $42.98
Shipping Costs   = $6.00
Gift Options     = $5.00
Shipment 1 Total = $53.98

------------------------------------------------------------

Order Summary

Shipment 1 Total     = $53.98
------------------------------------------------------------
Order Total          = $53.98

Have questions about your order or any other customer
service issues?

-- Check your order status online or view our Help section
   by visiting http://www.ZanyBrainy.com.  The links in the
   top right area of the page will guide you.

-- Call ZanyBrainy.com toll-free at 877-WOW-KIDS
   (877-969-5437) or locally at 614-396-4915.  Or email us
   at service@ZanyBrainy.com.  You'll always find a
   ZanyBrainy.com KIDsultant on hand to help you, 24 hours a
   day, 7 days a week.

Thank you again for shopping at ZanyBrainy.com--where you'll
always find the Best Stuff for Kids!

Your ZanyBrainy.com KIDsultants
http://www.ZanyBrainy.com
Extraordinary Toys for Extraordinary Kids


PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU ARE COMPLETELY PACKED BY 3:00 PM.  THE MOVE TEAM WILL BE ON THE FLOOR BY 3:00 PM.

ALSO:

1. EMPTY VOICEMAIL
2. TAKE HOME LAPTOPS AND PALM PILOTS, IPAQ'S OR BLACKBERRY'S
3. TO BE HERE AT LEAST ONE HOUR PRIOR TO YOUR NORMAL TIME ON MONDAY MORNING.  THE FLOOR WILL BE OPEN BY 5:00 AM
4.  PACK HEADSETS. (BOX,  BLACK WIRE TO EARPIECE AND BLACK CORD THAT CONNECTS UNDER DESK) ONLY LEAVE GRAY WIRES

LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS  OR IF YOU NEED ANY HELP
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


Here you go, Chris. Please ignore the last four days, as they are still under
construction. And let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kate


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Energy Exchanges Online - Scottsdale - December 4-6
B2B e-commerce has revolutionized commodity trading, the A&D process and
procurement within the energy industry. With heavyweight keynotes and in-depth
panel discussions this is the first event to bring the major energy companies,
net markets, venture capitalists, regulatory bodies, investment banks and
analysts together to thrash out why its not business as usual but business
online.

For more information please visit www.eyeforenergy.com/xonline

*********************************************************************
===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 8, 2000
As Presidential Election Hangs in Balance, So Do Key Energy Issues
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

After a tumultuous Election Day full of constant changes in the projections,
the identity of the next president of the United States was still unknown
as of Wednesday morning, Nov. 8. The identity of the next U.S. president
will be determined by a vote recount in Florida, which must be completed
by the close of business Thursday, state election officials said. Tuesday's
national vote count is so close, as is the number of electoral votes won
by GOP candidate George W. Bush and Democrat Vice President Al Gore, that
the presidential election is too close to call. It is also possible that
one candidate could win the Electoral College vote and the other win the
popular vote, which hasn't happened in a hundred years.

ANALYSIS: Well, it certainly has been a history-making Election Day. I
was prepared to analyze the future of the energy industry, based on which
presidential candidate had been elected yesterday. As the candidates have
such polarized platforms with regard to energy issues, it is not an
overestimation
to say that many critical energy issues hinge on this election. As we await
the final (and accurate) announcement of who is the next U.S. president,
which may not come for another day or so, it is a good time to review how
each candidate intends to address low domestic supplies of oil and natural
gas, the status of deregulation, the development of renewable energy, and
the high cost of energy due to recent price spikes.

Throughout the campaign, Bush criticized the Clinton-Gore Administration
for not developing a comprehensive energy policy. Rather than developing
an effective energy policy, Bush accused Gore of raising gasoline taxes,
discouraging domestic production of oil and natural gas, and failing to
anticipate the oil and natural-gas price spikes that have occurred this
year. Bush also was very critical of President Clinton's decision to tap
into the Strategic Reserve Fund in September and release 30 million barrels
of crude oil from the nation's emergency oil stockpile.  As the United
States now enters a so-called "energy crisis," brought about primarily
as a result of rising demand and diminishing supplies, Bush has outlined
an energy policy that includes more than 20 initiatives. I can't address
all of them, but have identified the key policies that will likely unfold
under a Bush administration. Perhaps the best summary of Bush's energy
policy is that he supports a comprehensive approach to ensuring U.S. energy
security, and intends to accomplish this by expanding domestic resources,
using a range of fuels and technologies, supporting ongoing deregulation
of the industry, and providing energy assistance to low-income households.

Reduce American dependence on foreign supplies of oil. Bush repeatedly
made the case that, since 1960, U.S. energy demand has more than doubled,
far outstripping domestic production. Today, the United States consumes
approximately one-third of the world's energy, and approximately 28 percent
of our usage comes from foreign sources. Bush contends that U.S. dependence
on foreign oil has increased from 50 percent in 1993 to 56 percent today,
and that oil imports are projected to increase to 15 million barrels per
day by 2010. To remedy this, Bush supports the development of domestic
sources for oil, natural gas and renewable energy. Specifically, Bush has
proposed opening 8 percent of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to
"environmentally
responsible and regulated exploration," with the intent of replacing the
oil that the United States now imports from Iraq. Regarding natural gas,
Bush will examine whether certain promising natural-gas reserves in federal
lands should be opened for exploration. Yet, it's important to note that
Bush is not suggesting that domestic supply of oil and natural gas will
be sufficient. Rather, he recognizes that access to an adequate supply
of foreign oil and gas is strategically important to the United States
and the global economy. However, instead of relying predominantly on Iraq*
especially
as Saddam Hussein threatens to reduce production*Bush will work more closely
with Canada and Mexico to increase cross-border flows of oil, natural gas
and electricity within North America.

Support new pipeline construction. As domestic production of oil and natural
gas increases to meet growing demand, Bush also supports the construction
of new pipelines, and would expand refining capacity by tearing down
"regulatory
hurdles." Bush has referenced the National Petroleum Council's estimates
that the gas industry will require 38,000 miles of new transmission pipelines
and 255,000 miles of distribution lines by 2015. Bush sees a need for new
pipelines and distribution lines in the Midwest in particular, where
traditional
coal plants should ultimately be replaced by gas-fired plants.

Support the growth of renewable energy. Bush supports the development of
renewable and low-emission fuels, and has committed to investing $2 billion
over 10 years to fund "clean-coal technologies" and $1 billion over 10
years to help utilities purchase nuclear plants. At the same time, Bush
will propose legislation requiring utilities to reduce harmful emissions
from their generation plants, and offer tax credits for power produced
from alternative or renewable fuels. However, Bush recognizes that while
renewable energy is important, it currently accounts for less than 4 percent
of the total U.S. energy consumption. Consequently, for the foreseeable
future, Bush contends that hydrocarbons*oil, coal and natural gas*will
continue to play the primary role in meeting the growing energy needs of
Americans.

Support electric deregulation. Bush supports deregulation of the energy
industry and prefers to let "markets, and not government officials*determine
investment decisions" and "give customers a choice of suppliers." Toward
this end, Bush believes that federal restructuring legislation is needed
to "assure the reliability of the nation's electrical grid, and to promote
consumer choice by removing federal barriers to competition." While he
supports consumer choice, Bush recognizes that often low-income families
face high electricity prices (as was found in San Diego this summer).
Consequently,
Bush supports the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), the
largest direct expenditure energy subsidy program, which has about $155
million left in funding to support emergency funding for cooling and heating
assistance. In addition, Bush will expand the Weatherization Assistance
Program, which supports about 76,900 homes by spending $1.4 billion for
Weatherization programs over the next ten years.

As noted, the presidential candidates are proposing very different platforms
with regard to the energy industry. Thus, it is not surprising that Vice
President Gore disagrees with most everything that Governor Bush is proposing.
Essentially the most striking difference comes down to conservation. While
Bush supports the exploration of domestic fuels, Gore believes the United
States should focus on doing more with what we already have, and protecting
the environment for future generations.

Of course, Gore carries the legacy of his Clinton-Gore administration,
one that as noted has been criticized by Bush for not developing a
comprehensive
energy policy. Thus, it is not completely clear how Gore would depart from
what has been his administration's approach to energy issues over the last
seven years. It is likely that Gore's administration would follow much
the same path that the Clinton administration traveled, although Gore
certainly
has made the environment one of his core platforms (for example, his 1993
book, Earth in the Balance). Thus, is not surprising that "creating a clean
environment and stable climate" is one of the key foundations on which
Gore has established his energy platform.

Beyond that, Gore has said that his "new" energy policy will focus on five
goals: 1). Saving energy, reducing pollution, promoting a higher standard
of living and creating high-wage jobs. 2). Reducing the nation's dependence
on unreliable imported oil. 3). Protecting children against the threat
of pollution nationally and globally. 4). Dramatically reducing the threat
posed by global warming. 5). Curtailing brownouts by increasing the
reliability
of the power grid.

Perhaps the central initiative that Gore has proposed is the creation of
the National Energy Security and Environmental Trust Fund. Designed to
"bring revolutionary change to our transportation and energy infrastructure,"
the Fund would help consumers purchase energy-efficient vehicles, homes
and appliances, promote clean and reliable sources of electric power, and
encourage long-term solutions to reduce U.S. dependence on imported sources
of oil. Gore would provide consumers with a tax credit up to $2,000 to
purchase energy-efficient new homes or up to a $1,000 credit to upgrade
the efficiency of their current homes. Gore also supports expanding the
current 10-percent tax credit provided to homes or businesses that use
solar energy to generate electricity or heat water.

Gore opposes drilling in federal land, and instead aims to protect the
U.S. environment, increase reliance on low-pollution fuels and focus on
energy-efficiency / lower consumption programs. Articulating the Democratic
position on this issue, Senator Joe Lieberman made the following comments
in the vice presidential debate: "There are more resources within the United
States. If we can get three miles more per gallon from our cars, we'll
get a million*we'll save a million barrels of oil a day, which is exactly
what the refuge, at its best, in Alaska, would produce(We've got to develop
fuel cells, alternative energy. We've got to encourage people to conserve..."
Gore supports tapping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Fund, as President
Clinton did in September, to increase oil supplies, prevent winter shortages
of home heating oil and stabilize oil prices.

Perhaps the only issue on which the two candidates agree is deregulation
of the energy industry as a whole. This process is of course occurring
on a state-by-state basis, although many states have begun to resist
competition
due to current low prices in their states and fear of sudden price spikes
as occurred in California this summer. Bush clearly supports a national
restructuring law, while it unclear if Gore supports this as well, or prefers
to let states continue to deregulate on their own or opt out from this
process.

One thing is clear in all of this uncertainty. The future of the energy
industry hangs in the balance and will continue in one of two drastically
different directions as the final outcome of this election is determined.
As supply and demand issues continue to generate concern across the country,
it is certain that energy issues will remain on the radar of whichever
candidate is elected president.
===============================================================
Discover a world of utilities information in our new e-zine, SourceBook
Weekly, which will be launched on December 1, 2000. Get a free SourceBook

Weekly article at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Steve:  We need you to have a word with Senator Wyden about the transparency
legislation that I worked on with his office.  The bill is designed to
require transmission companies and generators to release operating data on a
real time basis.  Unfortunately, comments by Senator Wyden made at the FERC
nominee hearing left the impression that he is gunning for evil marketers,
including Enron.  Most importantly, that impression was left with McLane
Layton of Sen Nickles office who has been asked to support the bill.  Wyden
claims he was "misquoted".

 Nonetheless, impress upon him that Enron is sticking its neck out on the
bill because other marketers and generators do not necessarily agree that
more information should be disclosed and that we are not eagre to lend our
support if this is going to be turned against us.

I have attached the bill language (it has not been introduced).


Gerald,

	I'm struggling a bit the O&M Agreement.  I've made some changes to the draft
	you provided last week.  Let me review the basics that we need to incorporate:

	- We are contracting to provide specifically the maintenance of the electric drive train
	   I'm expecting GE to provide that support but we need to have an interface that I expect
	   to be Hanover.

	- Hanover may bid to provide the maintenance for the gas compressor as a separate
	  process with the customer. Customer is currently expecting to perform this function
	  themselves & call in contract resources when necessary.

	- ECS will need to reflect the cost and agreement and description of services to provide
	  us the "interface" between GE and Oakhill.

	- ECS will need to contract with GE for the maintenance services and then decide if we
	  want to assign that agreement to Hanover or carry that ourselves.

	I want to have these agreements set up to be executed prior to executing with Oakhill
	and contingent on the final execution of the CSA and O&M agreements with Oakhill.

	Lets discuss as soon as possible.

	Thanks
	mk


Hello Scott,

Your request is complete as follows:

Portfolio:
CP/ID 84078 ENA - IM Cleburne

CPR Record:
CP/ID 84079 ENA - IM Cleburne
BA/ID 84079

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_ENA)

	From:  Scott Mills                           08/30/2000 08:27 AM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa
Schulte/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Sitara Desk Request

This needs to be available in production by early afternoon.  Sorry for the
short notice.

SRM (x33548)


Hey guys, please read below and reply back to Diane Fellers with your cost
center.
Gracie
3-3985

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fellers, Diane R.
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:35 PM
To: Presas, Gracie S.
Subject: RE: May-Chargebacks

The following are the people I could not locate or associate with a cost
center.  Please let me know where to charge these:

Christopher Harrison  Electric Business Understanding  600.00
Teresa Carroll-Childers  Electric Business Understanding  600.00
Betty Keenan   Electric Business Understanding  600.00
James Zipperer   Electric Business Understanding  600.00
Stacy Patton   Derivatives I    800.00
Tim Rebhorn   Derivatives I    800.00
Andrew Rodriguez  Derivatives I    800.00
Noor Kaissi   Derivatives II    800.00
John Dozier   Wellhead to Burner Tip   600.00
Patrick Stafford   Wellhead to Burner Tip   600.00
Rhonda Worthen  Wellhead to Burner Tip   600.00
Hemmat Safwat   Basic of Risk Management  600.00
Mary Hain   Power Marketing   800.00
Alexia Elliott   Fundamentals of Corp Finance  700.00
Rhonda Worthen  Fundamentals of Corp Finance  700.00

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Presas, Gracie S.
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Fellers, Diane R.
Subject: May-Chargebacks

Diane,

Please see the attached listing.  I will try and get this information to you
sooner next time.  It just takes a long time because I have to manually input
the SS#.
Important:  The Cost Centers/WBS # in red should not be changed.
Gracie
3-3985

 << File: May2001chargeback.xls >>


Of course I can!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	FW: New Mexico Power Plant Project

Everyone,

Looking for a volunteer to market TW to this new power plant so that they will take the supplies off our pipe.  Any takers?

Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lohman, TK
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:35 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: New Mexico Power Plant Project

Supplies have not been lined up as of yet.  They are waiting to get farther along on the permits.

TK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Lohman, TK
Subject:	FW: New Mexico Power Plant Project

TK, just checking to see if you have heard who may be supplying the supply for this plant?

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: New Mexico Power Plant Project

Can we contact them to find out about how they plan to get their gas supply? I know Stan will ask me about this one.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brennan, Lorna
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Chavez, Gabriel; Dowd, Stephen; Gadd, Eric; Hyatt, Kevin; Millar, John; Ratner, Michael; Taylor, Gina; Hass, Glen; Loeffler, Michael; Stanton, Lon; Wilson, Rob; Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Goradia, Pallavi; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Moore, Jan; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	New Mexico Power Plant Project

Regent Energy in Pact to Develop 500 MW Plant
Regent Energy recently executed a contract with Millennium Energy Ventures, a private Houston-based venture capital and project development company, to develop an electric plant with 500 MW generating capacity on Regent's Horseshoe Gallup lease in San Juan County, NM.
Regent will own 75% of the project, while MEVCO will own the remaining 25%. The estimated cost of the project comes in at $250 million.
Under the agreement, MEVCO will manage the permitting, estimated at 6 to 9 months, and construction process, arranging the equity as needed for same. Regent will be prepared to give up 50% (total) of its 75% net for the financing, netting a 25% interest following the equity/debt financing.
Further terms of the agreement provide that MEVCO will assist Regent in the acquisition of several gas fields in the Four Corners area, San Juan and Rio Ariba Counties of New Mexico, totaling an estimated 90+ Bcf and 20 MMcf/d current production. This production will be sufficient to power 100 MW of the power plant, with the remaining supply to be aggregated from other San Juan producers.
MEVCO Managing Director Phillip Gennarelli noted, "We are pleased to be involved in this project with Regent. The addition of more producing properties in the area that we bring Regent, coupled with Regent's Horseshoe Gallup holdings, which are in direct proximity with the existing Four Corners Power Plant and the route of the recently announced Sonoran Pipeline venture of Calpine and Kinder Morgan, will provide an unequaled opportunity for both companies."
Regent President John Ehrman said, "The additional production from producing properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing, currently producing some $1.5 million per month in net operating income, coupled with the additional income through power generation helps Regent to maximize the location of our holdings in relation to the proximity of the existing power plant and transmission lines to key electricity markets in Los Angeles and other western markets. It is a good use of our surface lease, not related to the current proved mineral reserves of the lease."
The producing oil and properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing are in Regent's core area of the Four Corners region near Farmington, NM. Regent will be required to finance the acquisition of the oil and gas proven producing properties under consideration.
Recently, Regent announced that it was in the process of purchasing the interests of all remaining working interest owners in the field, a transaction that is expected to be consummated by the end of the third quarter 2001, giving Regent 100% ownership of the current minerals on the lease.


Mark -

I understand you may get a call from Steve Kean about these Q and As.  I've sent copies to Tim Detmering (to get comments on the business side) and to Lance, Scott Wulfe, Joe Dilg, Shelley Barber and John Ale on the legal side (and several others).  I've also asked VE to prepare something for us to send to our employees that addresses what we can and can't say or do in terms of sharing information with Rockne (from an anti-trust and confidentiality standpoint).  It would be great if Richard Sanders or Bob Williams could help on this.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kimberly, Kelly
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	Denne, Karen; Walls Jr., Rob
Cc:	Hicks, Debra
Subject:	Q and As

Robbie--thanks for helping us vet these through the legal team.  Everything else hinges on these Q and As, so the sooner you can get them to look at it the better.  THANKS!


Your own personal palm pilot hard at work.  As promised, here's a list of
UT's games this season...color coded for your convenience of course.

Sep 9                UL Lafayette,  12:30pm

Sep 16              at Stanford,   10:15pm

Sep 23              Houston,   TBA

Sep 30              Oklahoma St.,  TBA

Oct 7                 Oklahoma,   3:30pm  (a.k.a. "OU Weekend"...this is a
huge game...the two teams meet halfway at the Cotton Bowl in Dallas)

Oct 14               at Colorado,  TBA

Oct 21               Missouri,   TBA

Oct 28               Baylor,   TBA

Nov 4                at Texas Tech,  2:00pm

Nov 11              at Kansas,   TBA

Nov 24              Texas A&M,   3:30pm  (Thanksgiving Weekend)

 All Times Eastern

* Home games are in burnt orange...what else?


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	John Buchanan - Oncall

Date:		12/30/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 7:55 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Will you please set up two new indices in the database.  The first one will
be NGI Southern Border, Socal.  This is different for the current NGI Socal
border index in the system.  Also, please set up NGI Southern Border, PG&E.
Let me know when they have been added.  These indices will begin posting in
NGI for April, 2001.

Thank you,
Mike Grigsby
x37031


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
04:08 PM ---------------------------

	From:  George F Smith                           01/29/2001 02:41 PM

To: Kevin Brady/NA/Enron@Enron, Martin Cuilla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Dempsey/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Donohoe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren
Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tammy Gilmore/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kirk Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Teresa McOmber/NA/Enron@ENRON, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles T
Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Parks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cora
Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark L
Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jessica
White/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA/CPR AVAILABILITY

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by George F Smith/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
02:39 PM ---------------------------

Russ_Severson@enron.com on 01/29/2001 02:24:34 PM
To: Jeffrey_C_Gossett@enron.com
cc:
Subject: SITARA/CPR AVAILABILITY

The SITARA system will be brought down Saturday afternoon (February 3  @
5PM Central Time) to facilitate
trading changes on the East desk.  The system will be available early
Monday morning.

CPR will be available during this time.

Please call the SITARA HOTLINE ((713) 853-7049) if you have any questions
or concerns.


Please prepare an executable employment agreement for Juan Hernandez in East Power Trading. Thanks!


MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF WES COLWELL:

You have been selected to participate on the VP Commercial Support PRC
Sub-Committee to cross calibrate and rate the Commercial Support Vice
Presidents.  This PRC will be held on July 20, 2001 in EB 49C1.  You will be
responsible for representing Vice Presidents in your functional area and/or
business unit.  The attached file details specifically, the employees we are
requesting that you represent.

Two weeks prior to the meeting, you will receive the following information to
facilitate your preparation.

1. Employee Profile
2. Consolidated Feedback
3. List of Accomplishments
4. Functional vs Business Unit Ranking Differences

You should discuss the performance of these Vice Presidents with their
manager and resolve any issues based on feedback received prior to attending
this meeting.  The results of this committee will be reviewed and approved by
the VP PRC Committee on July 23, 2001.

If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me at
ext. 37249.

Wes Colwell


Heres the latest with the PGE changes.   I will send the latest when Robert
reviews the SDGE and SCE portions

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Soo, Jeffrey A.; Tribolet, Michael; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject: DRW credit accumulation

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 10:58 AM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate 05/09/2001 03:58 PM 	   To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: DRW credit accumulation

 << File: m010508.xls >>


Westlaw has a new product - Westnews out on market in competing with Lexis'
Company Dossier on Lexsi-Nexis Universe.   You will have an opportunity to
learn Westnews from Michael Springler, Westlaw Attorney.  The presentation on
Westnews will be held at Conference Room EB47C2 on Thursday, from 12:00 noon
- 1:30 PM.  Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.  Please R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu
( x36775) or (email) by noon, 7/26.

Uncover relationships between people and businesses by searching Westnews and
public records on Westlaw.

Resources available include:
Company Profiles / People Finder / Asset locator
Corporate and Limited Partnership Records
Bankruptcy filings / UCC filings / Lawsuit filings
and more than 6,000 news and business publications,
including The Wall Street Journal.

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

"Mike Gioffre" <dgioffre@hotmail.com> on 09/11/2000 05:08:19 AM
To: dmears8894@aol.com, reedbohner@aol.com, jpgiles@hotmail.com,
tom.giles@mail.house.gov, aukhound@aol.com, collins@archmereacademy.com,
wdonato@safegardgroup.com, bhickey@cmiprint.com, miorii@aol.com,
dcatalina@juniper.com, fatpatde@aol.com, rbeste1301@aol.com,
dhannum@philipinc.com, gioffrebnftsrvcs@cs.com, wgioffre@aol.com,
jasgioffre@aol.com, chris.hannum@ssmgroup.com, dhannum@earthlink.net,
gioffrem@aeltus.com, dgioffre@hotmail.com, sjs1516@earthlink.com,
dukern8@gateway.net, jim.rogers@libnet.com, cdolan@above.net, sncd@erols.com,
mdorgan@celestica.com, thdiaman@sordoni.com, benjamin.rogers@enron.com,
jpenney@hollandlessard.com, michelle.sautter@ibx.com, jverre99@hotmail.com,
lconte@hearst.com, elizabeth.sprich@marriott.com, clukawski@hitt-gc.com,
pfarinas@TVSA.com
cc:
Subject:

 > > This guy walks into a bar and two steps in, realizes it's a gay

 > > > >>>>bar but

 > > > >>>> > >decides, "What the heck, I really want a drink."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >When the gay waiter approaches he says to the customer,

 >"What's

 > > > the

 > > > >>>>name

 > > > >>>> > >of your penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer says, "Look, I'm not into any of that. All I
want

 >is

 > > > a

 > > > >>>> > >drink."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The gay waiter says, "I'm sorry but I can't serve you until

 >you

 > > > tell

 > > > >>>>me

 > > > >>>> > >the name of your penis. Mine for instance is called Nike, for

 >the

 > > > >>>>slogan;

 > > > >>>> > >'Just Do It.' That guy down at the end of the bar calls his

 > > > >>>>Snickers,

 > > > >>>> > >because;

 > > > >>>> > > >'It really Satisfies.'"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer looks dumbfounded so the bartender tells him he

 >will

 > > > >>>>give

 > > > >>>>him

 > > > >>>> > >a second to think it over.

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >So the customer turns to the man sitting to his left who is

 > > > sipping

 > > > >>>>on a

 > > > >>>> > >beer and asks, "Hey bud, what's the name of your penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The man looks back with A smile and says, "TIMEX."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The thirsty customer asks, "Why Timex?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The fella proudly replies, "Cause it takes a lickin' and
keeps

 >on

 > > > >>>> > >tickin!"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >A little shaken, the customer turns to the fella on his right

 > > > who's

 > > > >>>> > >sipping on a fruity margarita. "So, what do you call your

 >penis?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The man proudly exclaims, "FORD, because quality is Job1." He

 >then

 > > > >>>>adds,

 > > > >>>> > >"Have you driven a Ford, lately?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >Even more shaken, the customer has to think for a moment

 >before

 >he

 > > > >>>>comes

 > > > >>>> > >up with a name for his penis. He turns to the bartender and

 > > > >>>>exclaims,

 > > > >>>>"The

 > > > >>>> > >name of my penis is Secret. Now give me my beer."

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The bartender begins to pour the customer a beer, but with a

 > > > puzzled

 > > > >>>>look

 > > > >>>> > >asks, "Why secret?"

 > > > >>>> > >

 > > > >>>> > >The customer replies, "Because it's STRONG ENOUGH FOR A MAN

 >BUT

 > > > MADE

 > > > >>>>FOR

 > > > >>>>A

 > > > >>>> > >WOMAN!"

 > >

 > >

 >

__________________________________________________________

Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com

------- End of forwarded message -------

__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


For you CAISO watchers:

Some interesting info from Anjali Sheffrin's (Director, CAISO Department of
Market Analysis) latest monthly report.  I cannot verify the data, but here's
what she says:

Total underscheduling (% of load procured in R/T) is down from 10% in
February to 6% in March and April.  Thus, CERS, seems to be actually
performing its role of buying the net short position of the State before R/T.

Of all power bought in R/T, the large majority is (90% +) is purchased OOM
rather than the through the hourly auction.

Of the OOM, approximately 95% is purchased by CERS.  By implication, IOUs are
buying about 15% of the R/T power procured from ISO (100% of the non-OOM, and
5% of the OOM).

The large majority of R/T is purchased from out-of-state resources.


Though there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding whether and when Davis will call back the California legislature to address the Edison MOU, here's the latest information we have.
Faced with horrible polling, an unwilling legislature, an uncooperative California PUC, and a wily leader of the state Senate (Burton), Davis is now considering delaying any action to call back the legislature.
Rumors of a delay come despite Davis' statements that he would call them back next week.
We received the information about a likely delay from an Edison SVP who's working with administration staff to come up with a deal that the legislature can finally swallow.
It's Edison's view that the earliest Davis would now call the legislature back is end of next week, with early the following week being most likely.
At this point, the chance remains that Davis may be forced to throw up his hands and call the whole thing off, leaving Edison to follow PG&E into chapter 11.
In the meantime, negotiations between Davis' staff, and staff from the Senate and Assembly continue.

We'll report back with information as we get it.

Best,
Jeff


(See attached file: hpl0617.xls)

 - hpl0617.xls


Please send the economist piece around.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
07:16 AM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
09/01/2000 06:09 AM
To: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: California

I may have missed it in your many e-mails, but if you had not seen it, The
Economist of 26 August has an excellent piece on the lessons of California
(p. 16 of European edition).  California botched it, Pennsylvania did better,
and California's problems are no reason to shrink from deregulation.   mcs


This memo will confirm the above referenced meeting will be held in Room
EB2868 tomorrow morning, 12/14/2000 at 9:00 a.m. Houston Time and 3:00 p.m.
London Time.  Next Thursday, December 21, it will be held in Room 50M03.

Claire/Lauren

For everyone calling in from the London office, please advise them to dial
the following number:  713-345-3324.  Also, since I was unable to find James
Nu on the email address, will you make sure he is aware of the room change?

Thank you in advance.

Dorothy


Out of Office.


Tracy,

My home number is 713 682 6667 and my cell number is 713 504 9879.  Feel free to call if you need anything.

Jeff

	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate 11/16/01 04:00 PM 	   To: Blake Walker/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Lambert/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Poche/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX  cc:   Subject: Corp Request

Thanks for all your help on the latest Corp firedrill.  Corp has notified me that they may call me over the weekend with questions.   Please e-mail with a number I can reach you at in case I need to contact you.

Thanks

Tracy


----- Forwarded by Joel Brainard/ORE/NYSDPS on 01/25/02 03:23 PM -----

"Kirkpatrick, Joe" <Joe.Kirkpatrick@constellation.com>
01/20/02 08:12 PM
Please respond to market_relations

        To:     NYISO TIE List <joel_brainard@dps.state.ny.us>
        cc:
        Subject:        Reduction of OOM?

Joe Kirkpatrick wrote:

On a side note it is interesting to note that there is a recent
presentation
to the AMP/ICM Task Force by one of the participants that has determined
that if all the large suppliers collude in tandem to withhold 50 MW each
that there could conceivably be an increase in price. While this
conspiracy
theory is of concern to said presenter it would seem highly unlikely,
especially considering that bid load or exports provide a much higher
impact
on price in reality than the unlikely scenario of some large suppliers all
colluding in tandem.

My comment:

This is a serious mischaracterization of what was said.   No collusion is
required.  All that is needed for a large impact on prices from the
exercise of market power is for the generators to act in their own self
interest.

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: paul.d.thomas@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-629431H@lyris.nyiso.com


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/13/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/13/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/13/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 933,816.
2/13/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 169,657.
2/13/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,019,210.


will do.

	Dan Leff@EES
	12/27/2000 11:02 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Update--Day 1 of California PUC Hearings

Jeff - Thank you for the comprehensive coverage.

I know you have a lot going on, with many to communicate with / to.  If you
could, please add Jeff Messina/HOU/EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES, to your distribution lists.

Thank you again - Dan

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/27/2000 08:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES,
Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika
Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W
Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris
Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES,
Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES,
Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update--Day 1 of California PUC Hearings

Thanks Roger.  Here are the highlights of today's hearings:

 Common themes--many tracked ours pretty closely
Not a question of whether rates need to rise, but by how much.
Though some oppose any and all rate increases, the lion's share acknowledged
that the utilities have a cash flow problem and the a rate increase is
necessary.
Due process matters.
If the Commission is thinking about going as far as ending rate freezes and
increasing rates, it better provide for ample due process, or countless law
suits will ensue.
Don't jump the gun.
A rate increase is likely, but only the utilities benefit from adoption of
the utilities' proposals. The Commission needs to carefully scrutinize the
utilities' claims and take a careful look at the level of increase required
to maintain access to capital markets.  However, as expected, the utilities
implored the Commission to jump the gun immediately.  The utilities want the
Commission to declare an end to the rate freeze and raise rates on Jan.4.
No more divestiture.
The utility should keep the generating assets it retained, but the Commission
should ensure that the assets' benefits are allocated equally among all
customers.  One legislator recommended that the State buy the utilities'
hydro assets, which would give the utilities the cash they need and give the
state control over some generation.
Treat all customers equally and fairly.
The Commission should not create two classes of customers (e.g., large v.
small; direct access v. bundled).  No customer group should be sacrificied to
save another.
Be as narrow as possible/do as little harm as possible
The immediate problem is the utility's cash/credit crunch.  As such, the
Commission should do only enough to solve this very specific, immediate
problem.  A modest rate increase is all that's required and the Commission
should do no more.

At the beginning and the end of the hearing, the President of the Commission
asked parties to be prepared (at tomorrow's hearing) to discuss whether the
Commission could legally use its other, broad powers to raise rates without
declaring an end to the rate freeze.  It seems that she seems some benefit in
raising rates, but leaving AB 1890 otherwise intact untill the Commission can

Marketers and generators are to blame for the problem
Though not universally embraced, the theme came up repeatedly.

A few parties (e.g., the Unions, low income consumer groups, one PUC
commissioner) called for complete re-regulation of the industry, returning
the utilities to vertically integrated monopolies.  But they were the
exception rather than the rule at today's hearing.

2. Next steps
There hearings were scheduled to end on Thursay, but now will continue
through Friday.
Tomorrow, lawyers will provide "oral" arguments on whether the Commission
must end the rate freeze in order to increase rates.  We will argue that it
does not have to, and should not, go through the complex and controversial
exercise of determing whether the rate freeze is over between now and
01.04.01.  We will argue that the Commission has the authority to raise rates
without ending the rate freeze, and if it decides to raise rates, it should
do so while keeping AB 1890's basic structure in place until a full and fair
hearing of the issues is completed.   We are talking to other stakeholders to
persuade them to take the same approach.  In terms of legal arguments, this
is clearly a long shot, but one that seems worth taking.
After the oral argument, the utilities will present their rate proposals and
"all interested persons" will have the opportunity to cross-examine the
utilities (in short, tomorrow will also be a zoo).
When asked what the process will be for issuing a proposed decision and
providing comments, the President of the Commission responded "we don't know,
it's evolving."  In other words, the Commission is doing a poor job of
ensuring that their Jan 4 decision is "appeal-proof."
Keep in mind that the situation remains extremely fluid and the trend is
still toward ending the rate freeze on Jan. 4th.  We continue to aggressively
offer alternatives to that possibility and continue to try to bring other
stakeholders to our side.
We're doing everything necessary to preserve our appeal rights.

We can discuss further on the 10 AM (CST) call tomorrow.

Best,
Jeff

	Roger Yang@EES
	12/27/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES,
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora
Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina
Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha
Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy
Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya
Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri
Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group
EB2868

Got an update from Jeff Dasovich.  No earth shattering news.  Comments have
been all over the place.  The impression is being made by differing parties
that the issues are very complex and would inevitably result in endless
lawsuits.  Possible conclusion by the CPUC may be to invoke emergency powers
to implement an emergency surcharge and avoid addressing the issue of when
the rate freeze ends in these hearings.  However, this is just speculation.
Jeff will return to the office by 5:00 pm PST and will send out a summary of
today's hearings.

Roger

Leticia Botello
12/27/2000 06:57 AM
To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony
Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M
Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric
Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES,
Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Ken
Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES,
Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa
Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha Lair/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fran
Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Reminder - Level Setting Mtg-California Markets Focus Group EB2868

12/27/00

Time    Location Call In #  Pass Code

10:00 Central Standard Time  EB 2868  1-800-713-8600  80435

This is a recurring daily meeting until further notice  (this invitation will
schedule your calendar through 1/31/01).

Time, Call In #, and Pass Code are the same for all meetings.  Conference
room location will be changed as soon as possible to better accommodate the
participants.

Note:  Optional Invitees FYI Only

Please call me if you have any questions

Leticia

x-58752


Tuesday, March 20, 2001
Electric Power Daily
ENTERGY, FPL GROUP SAY +ISSUES HAVE ARISEN,
IN PENDING MERGER, WILL NEED MORE TALKS
Entergy and FPL Group said Monday that they would hold talks soon to
address a address &certain issues8 that have arisen in connection with their
pending merger, which had been agreed to last July. In a joint statement, the
companies identified &governance structure/value-related issues and
integra-tion
of the two companies & as matters that would be discussed.
The two sides refused to make any further comments on the merger,
making unclear which side had raised questions about the original deal. The
companies gave no dates for the new talks, and they did not say if the merger
is still targeted to be completed by the end of the year.
Under the terms of the July 29 deal, which was called a &merger of equals,8
shareholders in the two existing companies would turn in stock and receive
shares in the new merged company that would have a market capitalization of
$16.4-billion and $10.7-billion in debt and preferred stock. Also under the
deal,
FPL Chairman James Broadhead would become chairman of
the new group and Entergy head Wayne Leonard would be
president and chief executive officer. FPL would name eight
directors to the new groups, board and Entergy seven.
The announcement that the two sides would hold new
talks about the merger was made early Monday and during
the day common stocks of Entergy and FPL both slumped
but closed above their lows for the day and well-ahead of
year-before levels. Entergy traded as low as $36.25 before
closing down 60 cents (1.6%) at $36.90, up 85.1% from
March 20, 2000. FPL got as low as $60.50 and closed down
$2.44 (3.8%) at $61.81. It was Monday,s biggest loser among
electric stocks but was up 43.5% from March 20, 2000.
Under the July 31, 2000, agreement, FPL holders are to
get one share of a new holding company for each of their
shares, and Entergy holders are to get 0.585 shares. At
Monday,s closing price 0.585 of an FPL share was worth
$36.159, less than Entergy,s closing price, so the acquisition
premium would be negative 2%. Lehman Brothers downgraded
both Entergy and FPL Group from Strong Buy to Buy.


Greg Whalley will be in attendance.

From: Suzanne Danz/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 09:53 AM
To: Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Raymond
Bowen/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Brown/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Rick
Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Causey/ENRON@enronXgate, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James
Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Steve Elliott/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Andrew S Fastow/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, James A Hughes/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Koenig/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kenneth
Lay/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey
McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy Olson/ENRON@enronXgate, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Greg
Piper/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey
Sherrick/ENRON@enronXgate, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/ENRON@enronXgate, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Adams/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Julie
Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Connie Blackwood/ENRON@enronXgate, Vanessa
Bob/ENRON@enronXgate, Vivianna Bolen/ENRON@enronXgate, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON@enronXgate, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy
Campos/ENRON@enronXgate, Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay
Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Suzanne Danz/ENRON@enronXgate, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Binky Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Mercedes Estrada/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/Enron@EnronXGate, Rosalee Fleming/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue
Ford/ENRON@enronXgate, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, G
G Garcia/ENRON@enronXgate, Christina Grow/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie
Harris/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Hawkins/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen K
Heathman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Esmeralda
Hinojosa/HOU/EES@EES, Kelly Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget
Maronge/ENRON@enronXgate, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Peggy McCurley/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy
McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jana L Paxton/ENRON@enronXgate,
Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marisa Rapacioli/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Leah
Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Marsha
Schiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Sera/ENRON@enronXgate, Tina Spiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauren
Urquhart/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Tori L Wells/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharron
Westbrook/ENRON@enronXgate, Joannie Williamson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject:

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting

Date:  Tuesday, May 29
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf. Call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984) or
  Suzanne Danz (713/853-6440) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

Yes, I will attend in person  ___X___

By video conference from  ______

By conference call   ______

No, I will not attend   ______

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, May
25.

Thank you,
Suzanne


Stan,

Thanks.  I would be happy to provide individual comment on a revised strawman.

I think the key will be creating autonomous practice writing units under an
umbrella board that has no power to itself write or modify practices.

So, for example, GISB would remain largely the way it is.  No one else would
write or approve gas wholesale standards.  But a high level EISB board would
concern itself with coordination, resources, and process.  That way we avoid
the problem of wholesale players driving retail standards, gas driving
electric, etc.  That was a clear message from the meeting we had.  I envision
3 units, GISB, retail, and some electric wholesale.  Make sense?

You really need to invent a process that minimizes the number of players with
control over someone elses assets, if the scope is wide.  If the scope is
very narrow (like Rae's list) there can be lots of players.

I am looking to proceed with identifying the scope, governance & resource
requirements for the retail component.  My goal is to turn the retail ubp
over to a suitable organization after version 1 is complete.  If EISB wants
to meet those requirements and be that organization, it can be.  I want to
put retail to bed.

I'll  get back to you on the EEI board meeting.  At the moment, the heat is
on reliability and FERC filings.

Thanks
  -Mike
>>> <Stanley.Horton@enron.com> 07/07/00 12:06PM >>>

Mike:

GISB has established a sub-committee to refine the strawman we sent to you
earlier.  Our aim is to have this ready by mid-August.

Our goal is then to take the strawman on the road to present to several
electric utility CEO's.  Hopefully, we can begin to gather some support for
the EISB approach.

We also plan to take the strawman to several of the ISO's, NERC, DOE, FERC,
etc.

A meeting with the EEI Board in September, per your suggestion, would fit
well into this plan.

Our goal is to determine whether there is industry support for the EISB
model by December.  I think this does that.

Any comments and/or suggestions you may have would be appreciated.

Stan

"Michael McGrath" <MMcGrath@eei.org> on 06/30/2000 09:03:47 AM

To:   <Stanley.Horton@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re:

Stan,

I'm thinking through that right now.  Frankly, the problem I see is in
being able to put an agenda together that would be attractive enough for
our CEO task force members.  I haven't figured out how to make a face to
face meeting before the September board meeting worthwhile, although a
conference call might work.  We probably could develop a formal task force
response to the strawman, but in some ways I think the first meeting notes,
draft principles and the concerns paper covered some of the turf.

So I'm thinking of an alternative - and please think of this only as a
maybe.  Suppose at the September board meeting I have a closed meeting on
the principles & scope & whatever else we can manage, and then have you
come in and talk to everybody in general session.  We could work out the
content of your talk, but it would be centered on the value of uniform
practices, their applicability to electric wholesale markets, and the
"EISB" approach.  Perhaps we could get Chuck Watson to help you.

There would be tough and probing questions - which you would know in
advance.

How does this sit with you?  I think it might be an interesting discussion
that would help to increase the collective knowledge and support.  I do not
have internal concurrence & support on this idea, but if you like it I'll
try to get it.

On another matter - I really need 5 or 6 examples  of areas where wholesale
electric practices would be useful and appropriate.  The question on the
floor is "Exactly what are the areas and types of practices we might
develop for wholesale electric markets?"

On the retail side the answer is easy, because we already have them (e.g.,
customer enrollment, billing & payments, metering,  load profiling, etc.).
But there really is no such list on the wholesale electric side.

Can you or Jeff help?  We can't just say "it's up to the members".  Having
a list would help demonstrate value.  I need something by next Thursday for
an internal strategy meeting.

Thanks
  -Mike

>>> <Stanley.Horton@enron.com> 06/29/00 05:14PM >>>
Mike:

Any suggestions as to when our respective committees could meet to begin
discussing matters such as principles, scope, governance, organization,
etc.?

If a meeting is not possible, is it possible to get your committee's
response to the "strawman" I sent to you?

Thanks,
Stan


who is the trader?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


John,

I have another meeting at 9:30 (hopefully a very short one).
I shall join your meeting in progress.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John Goodpasture @ ENRON                           09/15/2000 11:39 AM

To: Robert Lee/ECF/Enron@ENRON, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dwight
Larson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting Monday morning

Confirming a meeting to discuss the appropriate valuation assumptions for
Clean Fuels.  Let's meet in Dwight Larson's office (EB 4912) at 9:30 AM..

Kerry, I suspect this is the first time that you have heard about this
meeting, but I think you could add value to the discussion.  Hope you can
make it.  Feel free to call either Dwight or me for any further clarification
you might need.

Thanks, JNG


Per Gerald Nemec's request, I have attached the revised Timber Management
Agreement and the associated Timber Sales Agreement for your review and
comment.

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Chris, when did BP Amoco get involved?  I thought we were dealing with Avista.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger
05/13/2000 02:29 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal Update

Dave,

Update from Friday Afternoon:

Coyote:  Avista Board approved a 50% equity investment in Coyote Springs II
and publicly announced their intention to move forward.  Their equity
partner, BP Amoco, indicated that they need 30 more days to "get comfortable
with the market".  This thirty day period coincides with the expected
financial close of June 15 so it may just be posturing to let us know that
they are not committed until the deal actually closes.  Nevertheless, we
(Avista and Enron) will pursue fallback investors that have already seen the
project and previously expressed interest in a 50% share.  In parallel, we
will try to get BP Amoco "comfortable".  It might make sense to consider
someone else that can move quickly.  Deal probability drops from 80% to 50%.

LVCogen:  Vickers and Gilbert met with Sierra Pacific and confirmed their
interest in and ability to effect a restructuring of the PPA.  Although
timing of "securitization" is open-ended, Sierra has agreed to a contract
valuation that supports a valuation uplift of $10MM - $14MM.  If we assume a
40%-50% probability of restructuring, we get to the hotlisted $5MM gain for
QII.   Attached is a spreadsheet that shows the breakup value of LVCogen.
CTG and Power Structuring are finalizing the RAC models that support this
approach.

Regards,

Chris


Vince:

I received this email from Kevin - you may want to answer it.
I do not know exactly what to tell him.

Shirley

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com [mailto:Kevin_Kindall@fpl.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:01 AM
To: Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject: RE: CNN

I was wondering if Vince was still on the lecture circuit.  I recently gave
a talk at the Univeristy of Michigan, and thought that Vince might want to
do the same.  They have a financial engineering program, and even if he is
not actively recruiting, it would give him a chance to look the program
over.

-Kevin K


We will take the DPR/Consolidated flash variance of 259K expense.  Thanks
PL


can't do it , but i am willing to do my 4 and 7 for your 2

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/14/2000 02:55:19 PM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Redraw?

Alright how about your 3 and 5 for my 2 and 13

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:55 PM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: Redraw?

alright, how about my 4 and 7 for your 2

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/14/2000 02:51:55 PM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Redraw?

That won't work for me, when I look it over.  I give up too much for too
little

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:     Monday, August 14, 2000 2:51 PM
To:  Bass, Jason
Subject:  RE: Redraw?

no ican't do that.

how about my 4 and 7 for your 2

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/14/2000 11:47:11 AM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Redraw?

I won't be able to do that

How about your 3 and 5 for my 2 and 8.

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:     Monday, August 14, 2000 11:46 AM
To:  Bass, Jason
Subject:  RE: Redraw?

in order to counter offer, you must have had an offer.  if you remember,
you offered me a lesser trade than that already

my counter offer is 4,7,10 for your 2, 8

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/14/2000 11:13:52 AM

To:   "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Redraw?

Eric,

I have done some investigating and here is the counter offer I am willing
to
do.

I will trade you my 2 and 14 for you 3 and 5.  Let me know what you want to
do.

Ramiro would like to trade you his 13 for your 15 and 16.

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:     Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent:     Monday, August 14, 2000 8:21 AM
To:  Bass, Jason; Phillip M Love; Bryan Hull; David Baumbach;
lqcolombo@aol.com; Michael Walters; Matthew Lenhart; Harry Bucalo; Gary W
Lamphier; Steve Venturatos
Subject:  Redraw?

I am taking a vote on if we need to redraw the draft order.  Some, have
said
that it is not fair for Steve to be handed the 6th slot.  Let me know what
you
think.

-Eric


In theory, there may be some jurisdictions that do not allow tapes to be
admissable because of issues other than relevance--such as authenticity. It
is hard to know the Evidence Rules of every jurisdiction. I would suggest the
following language:

The parties to this Agreement agree that any such recording are admissable in
any legal proceeding for any matters relevant to the Agreement, except for
those recordings that violate the Parole Evidence Rule of the applicable
jurisdiction.


RE: 468302

Sean Crandall just changed this deal to reflect only a December term. Prebon
was right on this.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/28/2000 02:11 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 11-28-00 Discrepancies

Matt Motley
deal 468359
error:  Amerex shows Enron as seller not buyer

Bob Badeer
deal 468404
error:  Amerex shows price as $134.50 not $134.45

Bob Badeer
deal 468405
error:  Amerex shows price as $134.55 not $135.00

Mike Swerzbin
deal 468302
error:   Prebon shows December only

Jeff Richter
deal 468427
Prebon shows price as $177 not $197

Jeff Richter
I am missing the following deals per Prebon:
Enron sells to Tractebal Q3 PV at $175
Enron buys from Tractebal Q3 SP-15 at $145

Thanks!!


Hi Dung,

I haven't seen anything with performance or reliability metrics.  I'll send
this around to the other people in our group to see if they've seen anything.

Sue

	Dung Tran@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	03/20/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Network Performance and Reliability

Sue,

We're looking at evaluating our network metrics vs. other carriers.  Most of
the information I have found
centers on reach (i.e. miles of fiber, presence, etc.) as opposed ot
performance or reliability.  Has anything
crossed your attention in the Regulatory space that looks at this type of
issue?

Dung


Thanks for the ideas!  Mark

	Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/26/2001 01:40 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Trip to Japan

For the trip to Kyoto, I would recommend seats in the Green Car (non-smoking)
on the Bullet Train.

In Tokyo, I think that you and your son would enjoy Odaiba - Joypolis.
http://gojapan.about.com/travel/gojapan/library/photo/bltokyo_odaiba2.htm

I also think that Asakusa would be a fun area to visit.
http://gojapan.about.com/travel/gojapan/library/weekly/aa021201a.htm?terms=Asa
kusa

I will talk with my wife this evening to see if she has any additional ideas.

Thank you again for lunch.


Chris you set up a meeting with me next week to talk about the structure of
the 2001 DPR.


remove me from your email list

Shirley Sklar <shirley.sklar@idrc.org> on 03/15/2001 01:13:13 PM
To: stshouston@mailman.enron.com
cc: Ed Jarboe <ed.jarboe@idrc.org>, Shirley Sklar <shirley.sklar@idrc.org>
Subject: Attached Invitation from IDRC Houston Chapter

Attached is an invitation from the IDRC Houston Chapter.

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  HOUSTON41001.doc
     Date:  15 Mar 2001, 13:59
     Size:  71680 bytes.
     Type:  Unknown

 - HOUSTON41001.doc


Here 'tis.  I don't think it compared the charts, but it found lots of other
things to compare.

Kay


Gerald:  Attached in red-line format are my suggested additions to your
letter.

Craig Carver

 <<Drft 2 Wildhorse1.doc>>

 - Drft 2 Wildhorse1.doc


<<RE: Presentation>> Your message

  To:      Feeney, Shawn K [FI]
  Cc:      Steffes, James D.
  Subject: RE: Presentation
  Sent:    Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:15:40 -0500

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Feeney, Shawn K [FI] on Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:17:26 -0500
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:NAM:EXCHNY13

Message-ID: <32B0D9A2EB95F745BF57B5FFB7A231CBA3412C@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
From: "Kitchen, Louise" <Louise.Kitchen@enron.com>
To: "Feeney, Shawn K [FI]" <sf04104@imcnam.ssmb.com>
Cc: "Steffes, James D." <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>
Subject: RE: Presentation
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:15:40 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: "Kitchen, Louise" <Louise.Kitchen@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="ISO-8859-1"


Note:  EIA has increased their gas demand and price figures.  At the bottom
of this synopsis, the web site address  will
direct you to the full report released today if you would like further
information.

EIA: Gas Takes Bigger Share Long-Term

A higher rate of economic growth will lead to a greater expansion in natural
gas use than previously forecast over the next 20 years --- to 34.7 Tcf/ year
in 2020, up from 31.5 Tcf --- and a 10% increase in projected prices --- from
$2.81/Mcf to $3.13, according to the Energy Information Administration's
latest report.

EIA's Annual Energy Outlook 2001 (AEO2001) released today projects U.S.
economic growth at an average rate of 3% a year over the next 20 years, up
from its previous estimate of 2.1% per year. The economic growth will boost
overall U.S. energy demand from 96 quadrillion Btu in 1999 to 127 quads in
2020, up from the 121 energy quads projected by EIA one year ago (see Daily
GPI, Nov. 10, 1999). The increase in the projection for natural gas demand by
2020 of slightly over 3 Tcf (loosely equal to 3 quads) is responsible for
about half the change in energy projections.

EIA says the 62% increase in gas demand from 21.4 Tcf in 1999 to 34.7 Tcf in
2020, will be spurred by a tripling of gas use for power generation. During
the next 20 years 89% of new power generation units will be fueled by natural
gas. Gas prices are expected to decline within two years from current highs.
"In the longer term, technology improvements in the exploration and
production of oil and natural gas are expected to moderate price increases
even as demand for these fuels grows."

EIA projects world oil prices will reach $22.41/barrel (in 1999 dollars) in
2020, up just slightly from the $22.04 in last year's forecast.

The federal bean counters see a 1.8% average annual increase in power demand
over the next 20 years, compared to the 1.3% they predicted last year. Prices
will decline from the current 6.7 cents per kWh, but not as much as predicted
last year due to the higher projected gas prices. Instead of 5.8 cents per
kWh in 2020, EIA's AEO2001 sees electric rates holding at 6.0 cents per kWh.

Power to be provided by nuclear generation jumped 34% from the forecast last
year "due to lower estimated costs for extending the life of current nuclear
plants and higher projected natural gas prices, although total nuclear
generation still declines as some existing plants retire."

Coal will still be the primary fuel for power generation, but its share will
dwindle from 51% to 44% of the generating total.

For the full report go to this web site:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/earlyrelease/index.html


Attached is the credit worksheet for the Omnibus.  Steven needs this to go
out today.  Also, could you please forward to me a copy of the signed CA for
my file?  Call me if you have questions.

Thanks,
Tanya


---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
03:27 PM ---------------------------

Jason Rios@ENRON
11/15/2000 03:20 PM
To: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Global Mkts Presentation


I called Steve Smith and told him no re the request to put our stuff in his
data room.  He said what do you mean.  I said I meant that to the extent
confidentiality agreements prevented disclosure of the information he wants
to disclose, Enron does not waive the provisions or agree to the disclosure.
He asked me on what basis we claimed that they were not free to disclose the
information!  I told him that I assumed he would not have called me and
asked me to get Enron's consent unless he thought he needed it; and that I
had not analyzed which of the things he listed for me required our consent
to disclosure.  He said he would so advise Duke and that they would make
their own assessment of whether they were restricted from disclosing any of
the stuff.  I said he should do whatever he felt comfortable doing in light
of my categorical statement that they did not have our consent or agreement.
Eventually this will be more evidence of our perfidious behavior.

Neal S. Manne
(713) 653-7827
nmanne@susmangodfrey.com

 - C.DTF


Is your new address working?


The report named: West VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=West+VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/25/2001>, published as of 10/25/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


There are some personnel changes occurring in the Asia Pacific Finance
Origination group, which is a part of the AP/A/CHI region.  In alphabetical
order these are:

David Chang has moved into our group from Corporate Finance where he
participated in a number of the complex financings done with several
acquisitions in the Southern Cone.  Previously, he worked in ECM on
structured financings done by Enron Corp. as well as numerous transactional
related deals.  Before he joined Enron, David was with Nations Bank.
Initially, David will be focusing on developing additional fixed income deals
as well as working on finance origination deals generally.

Arleen Duran has accepted a position in the RAC group working for Mark
Ruane.  Arleen has been a member of various EI groups namely, EECC, Southern
Cone and Asia Pacific Finance.  She has been a very positive contributor to
the Financial Asset effort where she provided strong input into several of
the Philippine bond investments we've pursued.

Steve Flynn has accepted a position as the Assistant Treasurer, Corporate
Finance for The Walt Disney Company, which has a centralized finance function
responsible for all funding, equity and rating agency relationships.  Steve
is one of the original members in Asia Pacific Finance Origination and has
been a strong contributor in starting up the group and we will miss him.

Mark Peterson has joined our group from ECT where he was responsible for the
mid/down stream business and oil service sector investments made by Enron
Finance Corp.  Most of these investments were made through Enserco, a joint
venture with SCF Partners, a highly respected investment fund which focuses
on the service sector.  Mark will be looking to work with many of his former
clients as they seek to expand their operations internationally and to also
develop our downstream business with a particular focus on the resource rich
areas of Southeast Asia.

Nikhil Shah has been promoted to Associate in recognition of his efforts in
building the investment portfolio of fixed income investments.  Nikhil played
a key role in the Humpuss, Subic and Advance Agro transactions which will be
strong income contributors to the region this year.

Ed Smida will be moving to the Caribbean Basin group working for Frank
Stabler in a commercial position where he will be working to further enhance
Enron's operations in that region.  Enron has already met with considerable
success in that region and has identified a need for additional finance
origination support to more fully develop our business in that area.

Please join me in congratulating David, Arleen, Steve, Mark, Nikhil, and Ed
and wishing them success in their new positions.

Mike


I apologize if you receive this twice.  Good information - call Geriann to
get added to dist.

Jared
---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2001 01:45
PM ---------------------------
From: Geriann Warner@ENRON on 04/20/2001 01:06 PM
To: Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron
Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Shelley
Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, dbasford@mediaone.net, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mcurry@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
bjacoby@ect.enron.com, Steve Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas
Suffield/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, SSLATER@epsa.org, Jack Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
doug.arnell@enron.com, mitch.robinson@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Duke Energy Respectfully Requesting Legislative Action
Relative to Wholesale Merchant Plants

From Marchris

Geriann Warner
Government Affairs - The Americas
1400 Smith Street, EB 4740C
Houston, TX  77002
Tel: 713-853-5036
Fax: 713-853-7297
E-Mail: geriann.warner@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Geriann Warner/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 01:04 PM -----

	Marchris Robinson
	04/20/2001 10:39 AM

		 To: Geriann Warner/NA/ENRON@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: FW: Duke Energy Respectfully Requesting Legislative Action
Relative to Wholesale Merchant Plants

Forward to FL distribution list.

Note:  The Florida legislative session ends May 4.  It is highly unlikely
that any action will be taken on wholesale electric deregulation this
session.

I spoke to a staff member of the House Utility and Telecommunication
Committee yesterday and she informed me that they are starting the process
for an interim legislative study to expand on the interim report prepared by
the 2020 Study Commission (specifically the "stranded benefits" issue).

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 10:31 AM -----

	"Bill L. Bryant" <BILL@katzlaw.com>
	04/20/2001 06:19 AM

		 To: <Marchris.Robinson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: FW: Duke Energy Respectfully Requesting Legislative Action
Relative to Wholesale Merchant Plants

In case Larry didn't already send this to you.

Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL  32301
(850) 224-9634
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged.  If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material.  In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s).  Thank you.

Received: from fileserver.plante-adams (x.electronet.net [216.173.171.2]) by
mail.katzlaw.com; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:24:48 -0400
Received: by FILESERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<2WAMASTW>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:27:35 -0400
Message-ID: <B537FE05F1F7D411B76C000103348D7BED7D@FILESERVER>
From: Sally <Sally@Plante-Adams.com>
To: "J. Larry Williams (E-mail)" <larry@katzlaw.com>
Subject: FW: Duke Energy Respectfully Requesting Legislative Action Relati ve
to Wholesale Merchant Plants
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:27:34 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0C84E.624A88B0"

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Sally
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 4:08 PM
> To: 'campbell.walter.s33@leg.state.fl.us'; 'miller.jeff@leg.state.fl.us'
> Cc: 'mckay.john.web@leg.state.fl.us'; 'feeney.tom@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'fl_governor@myflorida.com'; 'crist.victor.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'king.james.web@leg.state.fl.us'; 'portilla.alex.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'horne.jim.s06@leg.state.fl.us'; 'latvala.jack.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'lee.tom.web@leg.state.fl.us'; 'sanderson.debby.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'dawson.mandy.web@leg.state.fl.us'; 'geller.steven.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'holzendorf.betty.sen@leg.state.fl.us'; 'klein.ron.web@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'schultz.debbie.web@leg.state.fl.us'; 'attkisson.frank@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'barreiro.gustavo@leg.state.fl.us'; 'portilla.renier@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'garcia.rene@leg.state.fl.us'; 'goodlette.dudley@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'haridopolos.mike@leg.state.fl.us'; 'hogan.mike@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'johnson.randy@leg.state.fl.us'; 'littlefield.ken@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'paul.jerry@leg.state.fl.us'; 'ritter.stacy@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'joyner.arthenia@leg.state.fl.us'; 'kosmas.suzanne@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'ryan.tim@leg.state.fl.us'; 'siplin.gary@leg.state.fl.us';
> 'smith.chris@leg.state.fl.us'; 'mgreen@duke-energy.com'
> Subject: Duke Energy Respectfully Requesting Legislative Action
> Relative to Wholesale Merchant Plants
>
> Mike Green, Vice President of Duke Energy North America, has asked me to
> forward to each of you the following letter (Request for Legislative
> Action). The second attachment (Utility Comparison Table.doc) is the table
> referenced in his cover letter. Thank you in advance for taking the time
> to read his letter which addresses the urgency to take at least some
> legislative first steps relative to wholesale power plants in Florida.
>  <<Request for Legislative Action.doc>>
>  <<Utility Comparison Table.doc>>

 - Request for Legislative Action.doc
 - Utility Comparison Table.doc


Elizabeth Edwards 44 20 7783 4419 (JT- Assistant)


This path just looks like it will be cut........... please take a moment to
look at it.

Also,

It is very important that you document when you cannot Reach Morgan Stanley's
real time.  An e-mail will do, send it to me.


Hello John,

Your request is complete. Please inform me of any missing desks.
Unless otherwise notified, I will inactivate Carla's record (Desk access) on
Monday, 12/4/00.

***Also, in case of my absence, please cc Kim Theriot's Team (EPMI Deal
Clearing & Documentation)
to submit and follow-up on any of your future requests.

CP/ID        EnPower Access Record

26048        Enron Power Marketing, Inc. - For EPMI Traders using the EnPower
System

       West Power Book / Desk

56849       EPMI Long Term West Management
56847        EPMI Long Term Northwest
56851        EPMI Short Term Northwest
56848        EPMI Long Term Southwest
56852        EPMI Short Term Southwest
56846        EPMI Long Term California
56853        EPMI Short Term California
58315        EPMI Long Term West Transmission
58316        EPMI Short Term West Transmission
58745        EPMI California Pool
58878        California Imbalance
59637        California Power Exchange-Schedule Coordinator
66819        EPMI Short Term West Hourly
70705        EPMI Short Term West BOM
70706        EPMI Long Term West Service
70707        EPMI Long Term West Spread Option

71884        Avista / WWP Supp
71950        Snohomish Supp
71951        Tacoma Supp

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(Global CounterParty_ENA)

	From:  John M Forney                           11/30/2000 07:20 PM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject:

Samuel,

Please set up Kate Symes as a trader with access to all of the West power
desks.    She is taking over for Carla Hoffman as a Deal Control specialist.
She frequently has to enter California deals (PX,  ISO,  etc) in addition to
bilateral transaction deal entry.

If you have questions,  please give me a call.

Thanks,
JMF


Can you add the referenced counterparty to the next list.  We just got a
master in signed with them and they cannot trade weather, pulp & paper & fx.
Much thanks!


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:11 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/27/2000 08:03 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

John Swafford spoke with David Vander in Wes' group last Tuesday and informed
him that, after reviewing matters, the Corp. State and Local Group had
reduced the charge to ENA from $821,000 to $321,000.  This reduction goes far
to bringing costs in line with those from last year and, the remainder of the
increase, relates to the expansion of support at Corp. related to the
expansion of ENA's business.  Best regards.  Steve.

David W Delainey
11/22/2000 03:05 PM
To: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

Steve, what is the status?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/13/2000 08:30 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

I spoke with Bob Hermann this afternoon and, in short, the single biggest
contributor to the increase in the corporate tax allocation relates to the
expansion of state and local tax support being provided to our new "business
verticals" - that is, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets and
Enron Net Works - which expense should be specifically allocated to such
groups rather than ENA, as is currently the case.  I will follow up with you
regarding the revised number after I have resolved the allocation issue.
Best regards.  Steve.

David W Delainey
11/10/2000 12:53 PM
To: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 Plan

Guys, I noticed that the corporate tax allocation to ENA has more than
doubled from 2000 forecast to 2001 plan ie) $1,600,000 from $700,000.  Could
you please explain.  Our goal which is being met in ENA's direct expense
groups is to remain flat year or year from 2000 to 2001.

Regards
Delainey


My January is very bad, how about early Feb?
Mike

Emilio Vicens@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 01:39 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: Eric Gonzales@ECT
Subject: Jose Project - Venezuela Visit

Mike, Jeff and Eric,

With the recent change of the President of PDVSA and the already announced
departure of the Minister of Energy and Mines in January, there has been a
significant amount of noise in Venezuela with respect to export projects in
general.  I believe it is critical for very senior Enron people to make a
direct pitch to the President of the country as soon as we can arrange one.
We need to let the President know directly the benefits of the project and
the strong commitment of Enron to the development of the project.  We have
alreday done this several times, but it is time to do it again.

I recommend a visit in early January of maybe Frevert or you Mike (maybe
both). We can also use this visit to have meetings with the new President of
PDVSA and, hopefully, if there is an official Minister appointed with the new
Minister.  It is not easy to fit in the President's agenda, so please advise
the course of action and tentative dates.

Thanks,

Emilio


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: John Brindle
Report Name: JB 014
Days In Mgr. Queue: 7