---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------

"Englander, Scott" <sle@tca-us.com> on 10/26/2000 02:25:52 PM
To: "Daniel Staines (E-mail)" <dstaine@ect.enron.com>, "Howard Fromer
(E-mail)" <hfromer@enron.com>, "Scott Monson (E-mail)"
<Scott.A.Monson@enron.com>, "Charles Decker (E-mail)" <cdecker@enron.com>,
"Dennis Benevides (E-mail)" <dbenevid@enron.com>, "Gautam Gupta (E-mail)"
<Gautam.Gupta@enron.com>, "George Hopley (E-mail)" <ghopley@enron.com>,
"George Wood (E-mail)" <George.Wood@enron.com>, "H. Jeffrey Ader (E-mail)"
<jeffery.ader@enron.com>, "Janelle Scheuer (E-mail)"
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, "John Llodra (E-mail)" <John.Llodra@enron.com>,
"John Zurita (E-mail)" <jzurita@enron.com>, "Kayne Coulter (E-mail)"
<kcoulte@enron.com>, "Larry F. Campbell (E-mail)"
<Larry.F.Campbell@enron.com>, "Paul Broderick (E-mail)"
<Paul.J.Broderick@enron.com>, "Paul Thomas (E-mail)"
<Paul.D.Thomas@enron.com>, "Richard Ring (E-mail)" <richard.ring@enron.com>,
"Robert Stalford (E-mail)" <robert.stalford@enron.com>, "Suneet Sharma
(E-mail)" <ssharma@enron.com>, "Tom Dutta (E-mail)" <tom.dutta@enron.com>,
"Tom May (E-mail)" <tom.may@enron.com>, "Zal Masani (E-mail)"
<Zal.Masani@enron.com>
cc: "Christi Nicolay (E-mail)" <Christi.L.Nicolay@enron.com>

Subject: NYISO Newsflash: External load a good deal

All,
?
You may already be  aware of this, but NYISO staff just revealed in a meeting
that significant  opportunities exist to purchase in real time from the NYISO
LBMP market at the  PJM proxy bus (i.e., as an external load), due to the
impact of ECA 1006B.?  When the tie is import constrained in BME, prices
there since the 1006 ECAs were  implemented have been as low as -$1000.? In
this case the BME price would  be used for settlement, and you would be paid
$1000/MWh to export power there  (as your export would offset inbound
congestion).
?
As more people begin  to take advantage of this, the BME prices can be
expected to be less  negative.
?
Caution!? If  you schedule a transaction DA, but it fails the DA checkout,
when there is  congestion on the ties in BME, you will have to settle the
difference at the BME  price, and could get hammered.
?
NYISO will probably  issue a bulletin about this later today.
?
Scott


Amanda,

Please add add a link called "Plant Outages (portland)", to the Gas
Fundamentals website under the Power tab.  The description is as follows:

"Query of Portland's database of plant outages for yesterday and today."

Thanks.

Mat


Requester: Ian Cooke
Request Type: Friday Off
Request Submitted: 2/5/2002 5:22:02 PM

Start Date: 2/15/2002 8:00:00 AM
End Date: 2/16/2002 8:00:00 AM
Length Requested: 8 Hours
Days Submitted: 1 Day(s)
Comments:

Please click on either the Approve or Reject button at the top of this message.  If you don't see them, fully open the message.


Dear Louise-

Just wanted to pass a bit of information along that made me proud....

My informational webmaps are the most visited sites of all the Fundy's web sites.  In fact we have three of the top seven sites!!!!

WOO HOO!!!

Julie  :-)


Britt

I have planned to meet with WFW (Neale Gregson) and Capt Sawant again
tomorrow. One of the issues I want to revisit with Capt Sawant is the issue
of putting the Owners on notice of the sensitivity of the cargo. I recall
Capt Sawant's opinion not to be as categoric as expressed in the memo, but
want to absolutely sure. Like you, I feel it is a very important point. I
will be discussing the issue of additional experts with Neale as well.  Neale
Gregson is an experienced maritime arbitration counsel and has experts he is
able to recommend.

As for privilege and discoverable documents, I discussed the issue with Neale
today and he recommends that communication with experts be routed through WFW
to avoid the issue. Reports to date and internal correspondence from in-house
counsel would be privileged as well. Attached is Neale's fax on this issue
for your reference:

Regards
Matt

From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 07/25/2000 09:07 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah
Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO

Matt,

 Good report.  I am concerned about this expert's conclusions, the most
troubling of which is that our putting the ship on notice of the end use of
the cargo would have been of so little importance.  That is probably our
strongest point.  I also share your concern about his lack of experience as a
witness in an arbitration.  We need an expert who is well respected by U.K.
arbitrators and their tribunals.  I will likewise try to get other names.

 Meanwhile, I question whether we should ask Capt Sawant to put anything in
writing concerning how to beef up his second report until we talk further.  I
am concerned that anything he puts in writing may be discoverable in a U.K.
arbitration proceeding if we use him as an expert and/or if he has any
otherwise discoverable factual information.  Would you mind passing this
concern by WFW for its comment?  I am assuming that the WFW counsel with whom
you are speaking are experienced maritime arbitration counsel.

 Thank you for keeping us advised.  Deborah, please print this out (including
the attachment) for the file.

       Britt Davis

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	07/25/2000 05:37 AM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda
McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO

Attached is the Memo of the meeting prepared by WFW. Although Capt Sawant is
very knowledgeable, he has never been an expert witness in an Arbitration. I
will be discussing with WFW about alternative experts.

Regards
Matt

Matthias Lee
07/25/2000 03:30 PM
To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah
Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT (bcc: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT)

Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO

Team

Just a brief update.

We are presently trying to consolidate all existing samples in singapore for
joint testing and analysis. We are facing some difficulty with the Batangas
samples because SGS Philippines has advised that they cannot airfreight the
samples without using IATA containers and that would involve breaking the
seals. Eric is examining our options to transport the samples to Singapore
and will be seeking the input of Cliff Bennett (Minton Treharne). One
possibility may be to transport by sea, but I understand that will take 5
days voyage but vessels between Philippines and Singapore are infrequent.

Meanwhile, I have been in contact with external counsel Watson Farley &
Williams (WFW) to finalise our legal position. WFW attended at our office and
interviewed with Capt. Sawant of PacMarine. WFW is preparing the memo of the
meeting which I will distribute when received.

FYI - the broker confirmed yesterday that Mitsubishi Corporation is the time
charterer of the vessel.

Regards
Matt


Just anything you want me to know about to represent you would be fine.  I
feel comfortable with where you are going to be placed, and can represent you
just fine with Kam's input.  How are things going?  How's the baby.  Hope all
is going well.  Take care.

Randy


Derek,

Attached is the document I prepared on GMI.  The areas that I could not find
data for I have left blank .  If you could also check the accuracy of the
information I have already filled in, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Andy


The August issue of Short Circuits looks at the transmission grid and the largest investor owned utility holding companies.

Rita Hartfield
Phone:  713-853-5854
Fax:  713-646-4702
Cell:  713-504-5428
Rita.Hartfield@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Maria Sandoval
07/12/2000 11:00 AM
To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phenicia Olivier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra S
Dutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, patty.soria@halliburton.com,
elizabeth.gutierrez@eott.com, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, amolina@unifirst.com, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Barreda/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Yolanda Pena/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber
Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, margiec@networkinterstate.com,
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Fw: Spaghetti

---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Patty Soria <Patty.Soria@HALLIBURTON.com> on 07/12/2000 10:34:48 AM
To: "'Molina, Angelica'" <amolina@unifirst.com>, "'Ragland, Dinah'"
<Dinah.L.Ragland@aero.org>, "'Sandoval, Maria'" <Maria.Sandoval@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Fw: Spaghetti

Patty Soria
Procurement Support Services
( 713-753-2676? O 713-753-3402
* E-Mail:? Patty.Soria@HALLIBURTON.com

-----Original Message-----
From:?? ADSilvestre@cs.com [SMTP:ADSilvestre@cs.com]
Sent:?? Monday, July 10, 2000 6:41 PM
To:???? jblack@msfrost.com; stephanie30@earthlink.net; Coryj98@aol.com;
robbchi@yahoo.com; Omomma@aol.com; MRoss42345@aol.com; Jpsoria@aol.com;
Patty.Soria@halliburton.com; steven.domkowski@teligent.com;
ameweaver@yahoo.com; ben@freeme.com

Subject:??????? Fwd: Fw:? Spaghetti

? <<Fw:  Spaghetti>>

Message-ID: <000001bfeac6$118953e0$02dadacf@computer>
From: Louis Gomez <Louisg@ev1.net>
Reply-To: Louis Gomez <Louisg@ev1.net>
To: Vicki Webb <Vickiwebb@aol.com>, Anthony Silvestre <ADSilvestre@cs.com>,
"Puente, Maria A." <maria.puente@bmo.com>, Lydia Nava <lnava@ev1.net>,  Alice
Madrid <a madrid@ev1.net>, Sonia Loberg <Lobergs@yahoo.com>,  Danny & Gloria
Gomez <dnggomez@gateway.net>, Sergio Gonzalez  <gsergio_@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fw:  Spaghetti
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:06:26 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_003_01BFEC17.F2877AD2"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Linda Koppy" <lkoppy@gsla.com>
To: <Cbardwel@gsla.com>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 9:07 AM
Subject: Spaghetti

A doctor was having an affair with his nurse. Shortly
after this started, she told him she was pregnant. Not
wanting his wife to know, he gave the nurse a large
sum of money and asked her to go to Italy and have the
baby there.

"But how will I let you know the baby is born?" she
asked.

He replied, "Just send me a postcard and write
'spaghetti' on the back."

Not knowing what else to do, the nurse took the money
and flew to Italy. Six months went by and then one day
the doctor's wife called him at the office and
explained, "Dear, you received a very strange postcard
in the mail today and I don't understand what it
means."

The doctor said, "Just wait until I get home and read
it and I will explain it to you."

Later that evening the doctor came home, read the
postcard, fell to the floor with a heart attack - and
died.

So the wife picked up the cord and read, "Spaghetti,
Spaghetti, Spaghetti, Spaghetti - two with sausage and
meatballs, two without."


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 01:09
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
01/24/2001 12:55 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PGE


We have created the new southern border index products for Socal and PG&E
topock.  Please create your new basis and gas daily products for these
indices as soon as possible.   Mattt will need to create the gd index
products as well.  Let the brokers know about the new indices  I have the
back office setting up new curves to book these deals.  You will have two
curves for Socal now.  The curves will show your risk on the old index, as
well as the new index.  The new Socal index is the same as the old except
that excludes KRS.

I will be taking these phys products out on EOL as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Mike


Read about Enron's inclusion on the Gay Financial Network's "gfn.com 50" in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FGT's Phase IV expansion
Clickpaper.com is added to two industry web sites
EES uses the 'Net to catch new customers
Learn what a swap is

It's all in the latest eBiz .  Go to home.enron.com , click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz May 11, 2001."


Never fear.  I've asked Janet to set up a meeting on Fri. and to make sure
the core group of you, Drew, Steve and I can attend.  If anyone else can
attend too, great.  If not, I'm sure we are going to have more than enough
input on Fri.

Jeffery Fawcett
06/28/2000 04:33 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Capacity Options on TW

You know how much I loathe these meetings with the Hee-Haw gang.  This
telecon/videocon will likely degrade into a raucous Omaha-led circle jerk
with everyone else, mostly the Houston group, trying to get a word in
edgewise.  Is there any way to make this more fruitful?

If we do this, and you want to include me, you'll have to put it together
before close of business Friday as I'm out all next week for surgery.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 06/28/2000
04:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           06/28/2000 03:41 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com

Subject: Re: Capacity Options on TW

Given the overwhelming response so far, I think a meeting may be necessary to
get this project moving.  Thanks. DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/28/2000 11:41 AM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON,
Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Capacity Options on TW

So far I have not received comments from anyone on the attached.
If you think it would be productive to get everyone together (possibly as
early as Friday?) for about an hour to discuss capacity options, I will set
up a meeting.   Please let me know one way or the other.
Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/28/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           06/21/2000 12:41 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON,
Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: Capacity Options on TW

Attached is a preliminary draft of a filing for capacity options on
Transwestern.  The attachments include a filing letter, proposed tariff
language and a proposed form agreement.

Obviously there are still quite a few details to be worked out.  I am
distributing a draft at this early stage in hopes of initiating a dialogue
about the larger issues first.  A few that come to mind are whether we want
to commit to selling options online, how best to explain or justify the
option fee, and what specifically in the industry has changed such that FERC
should depart from existing policy and allow TW to essentially reserve future
capacity for shippers.  Please let me know your thoughts on these and any
other issues.

I would prefer to wait to discuss comments on wording, other conforming
changes to the tariff, and other comments concerning form until after we have
resolved the substantive issues.  Thanks.


Dear Michael,

Customers who order a Nokia 3360 or Nokia 8260 digital phone with
12-month subscription from AT&T Wireless are eligible to receive a $50
gift card. This gift card is redeemable at the merchant of choice from
a list of participating merchants. To see a list of participating
merchants and more details, visit the AT&T Wireless Store at buy.com.
Offer good until 1/26/02!

Also, select an AT&T Wireless service plan and receive a $40 mail-in
rebate on any annual subscription starting at $29.99/month. Offer good
until 1/26/02!

The purchase of any of the phones featured in this e-mail requires a
12-month AT&T Wireless subscription (starting at $29.99/month). $35
activation fee billed by AT&T Wireless for each plan. Early
cancellation fees apply for each of these phones and plans. See below
for these fees. Please review service plan details on our site.

Featured Phones:

Nokia 3360
List price: $99.99 -$60 buy.com instant rebate   buy.com price, $39.99
before $40 AT&T Wireless mail-in rebate with 12-month annual
subscription

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Nokia 8260
List price: $179.99 -$110 buy.com instant rebate   buy.com price,
$69.99  before $40 AT&T Wireless mail-in rebate with 12-month annual
subscription

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Nokia 5165
List price: $79.99 -$79.99  buy.com instant rebate   buy.com price,
FREE with 12-month annual subscription before $40 AT&T Wireless
mail-in rebate

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Ericsson R289LX
buy.com price, $24.99  with 12-month annual subscription

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Ericsson LX588
buy.com price, FREE with 12-month annual subscription before $40 AT&T
Wireless mail-in rebate
**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Motorola V2397
List price: $49.99 -$49.99 buy.com instant rebate   buy.com price,
FREE with 12-month annual subscription before $40 AT&T Wireless
mail-in rebate

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Ericsson R300LX
List price: $49.99 -$49.99 buy.com instant rebate   buy.com price,
FREE  with 12-month annual subscription

**********************************************************************
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

AT&T DIGITAL ADVANTAGE $39.99 PROMOTION:
**********************************************************************
Click here for more info:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

New AT&T Digital Advantage customers with a $39.99 or higher monthly
plan get the following options automatically for as long as they
remain on the same service plan:

*    Nationwide Long Distance included in anytime minutes (from Home
     Calling area)
*    Unlimited Night & Weekend Minutes (from Home Calling area)

AT&T REGIONAL ADVANTAGE $39.99 PROMOTION:
**********************************************************************
For more details, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

New AT&T Regional Advantage customers with a $39.99 or higher monthly
plan get the following options automatically for as long as they
remain on the same service plan:

*    Unlimited Night & Weekend Minutes (from Home Calling area)

Rebates:
**********************************************************************
For more info, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

* $50 gift card with purchase of Nokia 3360 or Nokia 8260 digital
  phone and 12-month subscription
* $40 AT&T Wireless mail-in cash-back rebate w/ 12-month subscription
  for service plans starting at $29.99/mo. for a limited time.

P.S. Hurry! These fabulous offers are for a limited time only!
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp20BAbh0AO

Anytime Help: Please use the link below for your Customer Support
questions. Please do not reply to the buy.com eMail address. It is not
an active mailbox. Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eFCN0DwlK30Bp205Sb0Aj

All prices and product availability subject to change without notice.
Unless noted, prices do not include shipping and applicable sales
taxes. Product quantities limited. List price refers to manufacturer's
suggested retail price and may be different than actual selling prices
in your area.  Please visit us at buy.com or the links above for more
information including latest pricing, availability, and restrictions
on each offer. "buy.com" and "The Internet Superstore" are trademarks
of BUY.COM Inc. ? BUY.COM Inc. 2001.  All rights reserved.

Early Cancellation Fees and Other Plan Restrictions:
Early cancellation of service subscription with AT&T will result in a
cancellation fee of $150 from AT&T. Due to subsidized nature of each
phone price, if you cancel your service within 180 days from
activation, we will charge you the difference between the phone
purchase price and the list price at the time of purchase up to $110.
Subject to terms of AT&T service agreement. Taxes and other charges
and restrictions apply. Requires credit approval. Usage rounded to
next full minute. Unused allowances lost. Service not available in all
areas.

AT&T Digital Advantage Night and Weekend Minutes and Nationwide Long
Distance Included
New activations on AT&T Digital Advantage $29.99 and above and receive
this offer as long as you remain on the same eligible AT&T Wireless
rate plan selected at activation. Benefits terminate upon cancellation
of service or migration to another calling plan, including migration
to another price point. No wireless long distance charges apply to
calls placed from your Home Calling Area to anywhere in the U.S.
Standard airtime charges apply.  PLUS, new activations on AT&T Digital
Advantage Calling Plans receive additional Night and Weekend minutes
every month as follows: AT&T Digital Advantage $29.99 monthly calling
plans receive 1,000 additional minutes; AT&T Digital Advantage $39.99
monthly and above receive Unlimited Night and Weekend minutes. Night
and Weekend minutes available as long as you remain on the same
eligible AT&T Wireless rate plan selected at activation. Benefits
terminate upon cancellation or involuntary suspension of service or
migration to another rate plan, including migration to another price
point. Night and weekend minutes apply only to airtime used in your
Home Calling Area, applicable long distance charges additional. Nights
and weekend airtime is from 8:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. Monday - Friday,
and from Friday 8:00 p.m. through Monday 6:59 a.m.; plus New Year's
Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Other
restrictions may apply. Available until 01/26/02 unless terminated
earlier.

AT&T Regional Advantage Night and Weekend Minutes
New activations on AT&T Regional Advantage Calling Plans receive
additional Night and Weekend minutes every month as follows: AT&T
Regional Advantage $29.99 monthly calling plans receive 1,000
additional minutes; AT&T Regional Advantage $39.99 monthly and above
receive Unlimited Night and Weekend minutes. Night and Weekend minutes
available as long as you remain on the same eligible AT&T Wireless
rate plan selected at activation. Benefits terminate upon cancellation
or involuntary suspension of service or migration to another rate
plan, including migration to another price point. Night and weekend
minutes apply only to airtime used in your Home Calling Area,
applicable long distance charges additional. Nights and weekend
airtime is from 8:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. Monday - Friday, and from
Friday 8:00 p.m. through Monday 6:59 a.m.; plus New Year's Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Other
restrictions may apply. Available until 01/26/02 unless terminated
earlier.

We respect your privacy. If you would rather not receive eMail
alerting you of buy.com special offers, product announcements,
and other news, just let us know by clicking below:
mailto:unsubscribe_from_buy@enews.buy.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 03/07/2001
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,852
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,485
Total Life to Date Transactions	747,599

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 03/07/01	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,351	76%
Enron Europe Limited	413	55%
Global Markets	327	43%
Enron Metals	761	26%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,432,076,746
MTD	11,866,161,483
LTD	452,309,815,390
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,535,311,218

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	33,612,804,650

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	699
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,464
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,490
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,446


-----Original Message-----
From: navigator@nisource.com [mailto:navigator@nisource.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:49 AM
To: navigator@nisource.com
Subject: Critical,OTHER,20011020,COLUMBIA GULF,007854581,Sea Robin
(meter 481) Nominations - UPDATE

                       COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 19, 2001

Re:  Sea Robin (meter 481) Nominations - UPDATE
Notice ID: 3198
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company has been informed that the previously
reported scheduled maintenance work upstream of meter station 481 (Sea Robin -
Erath) has been completed and that the BTU now meets Columbia Gulf's
requirements.  Columbia Gulf is willing to accept nominations effective for the
gas day of October 20, 2001.


Oh, ok, I didn't know that. - wish I lived in France for August then.  As
long as it is ok with you that we don't get this purchased soon.  I just
wanted to make sure I did everything I could to get the software for you.

Thanks,
Karla

	Vince J Kaminski
	08/08/2000 09:35 AM

		 To: Karla Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Software License

Karla,

August is a vacation month in France.

I would not count on a response any time soon.

Vince

From: Karla Feldman on 08/08/2000 09:34 AM
To: geman@dauphine.fr
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Software License

Ms. Geman,

I am just following up to see if you had received my previous message
forwarded below and whether you have a response so that we can move forward
with this contract?

Thank you ,
Karla Feldman

----- Forwarded by Karla Feldman/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 09:23 AM -----

	Karla Feldman
	07/28/2000 01:41 PM

		 To: geman@dauphine.fr
		 cc:
		 Subject: Software License

Dear Ms. Geman,

I met with Vince Kaminski yesterday regarding picking back up with the
license agreement we were working on back in March.  He relayed some
additional requirements which need to be added to the agreement, which
include the following:

 1. The price agreed upon is $90,000.
 2. D-G will provide system support.
3. No later than 12 months of execution of the agreement, D-G will provide
the source code to Enron.  In the meantime, the source code is to be in
escrow.  Additionally, the source code would be released sooner than the 12
months if any of the following conditions occur:  (i) D-G goes out of
business; (ii) D-G is unable to provide effective technical support; or (iii)
if D-G agrees to release it sooner.

Before I have our attorney add these things to the agreement, we need to
discuss the escrow situation.  Vince mentioned that you had suggested that
your attorney keep the software in escrow.   Is your attorney a U.S.
attorney?  It seems like I may have recalled that way back in March you might
have said you had a friend or relative that was an attorney.  Is that the
same person?  Does this attorney work for a large firm, small firm, or solo
practitioner?  Basically, if you could just provides some additional
information about your attorney, I would appreciate it.

We normally would use an Escrow company to put the software in escrow.  We
have dealt with a company here in the U.S. called DSI Technology.  I will
check into that pending your answer regarding your attorney.

Once we decide what we want to do regarding placing the software in escrow,
we will red-line the agreement to reflect such changes and e-mail it back to
you for your review.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Karla Feldman
Enron Corp.
Contract Administration
(713) 646-7554


Lisa and I reviewed the captioned for purchase by  E-NEXT GENERATION LLC,
which is the special purpose vehicle established to finance North American
power project asset acquisition and development.   Most of these comments
have general applicablity to all equipment or service contracts destined for
the facility, so you can use these as a starting point for future purchase
contract drafting.   For that reason I have also cc'd Kay and Sheila.

1. The Purchaser should be E-NEXT GENERATION LLC and its Affiliates,
successors and assigns - the address should be c/o Wilmington Trust Company,
Rodney Square North, 1100 Market Street, Wilmington DE  19890-0001.
Attention: Corporate Trust Adminstration.    Maybe the place to include the
expanded definition of Purchaser is in Section 1.80. The reason we should
include Affiliates, successors and assigns is because of the need to get the
equipment into the project company if the project enters "Phase II" under the
finance documents.  Generally a project will be in "Phase II"
contemporaneously with the signing of the EPC contract.

2. Agent's address is 1400 Smith, Houston, Tx.

3. Section 1.16 - I think the concept of the "Combined Contract Price" is
probably not needed - haven't you decided that the Services Contract will not
be financed through E-NEXT GENERATION ?

4. Delivery Points -- Tax should confirm that there are no adverse tax
consequences to taking delivery of equipment imported from Belgium, whether
DDU or DDP.

5. The definitions of "Facility" (Section 1.31)  and "Site" (Section 1.92)
should  work so that the bank does not get a lien on the King Plant or its
land.  Maybe we could have two definitions for each - one with respect to the
technical requirements of the equipment and one we use for the "repowering"
assets only.

6. There should be no "Owner" in the contract.  Generally, the word
"Purchaser" should replace "Owner."   This change should not be made
globally, because sometimes the word occurs with "Purchaser" - see definition
of "Vendor."  In most of those cases, "Agent" should be added when "Owner"
is  removed.

7. For the Transportation Deduct Option - Section 1.116 - the tax department
should pass on whether title passing on delivery outside the U.S. will cause
adverse tax consequences.  Ditto Section 3.2.2 - "Delivery to Optional
Delivery Point."

8. Article II should be titled "Responsibilities of Purchaser and Agent" -
ditto in the title to 2.1.  In (f) through (i) of 2.1, should add "or Agent"
after "Purchaser."  Although the Section 23 "Relationship of the Parties"
provision sets forth the agency relationship between the Purchaser and Agent,
it can't hurt to clarify it here, too.

9. Remove Section 2.2.  Assignment provisions will be in Article XXII.

10. Section 3.8 (c)(4) uses "Indemnify" as a defined term - didn't see a
definition; Section 3.9 uses the defined term "Work," which I did not find,
either (may be comprehended in "Scope of Work").

11. In Article IV - the Representation and Warranties should come from the
Agent, if possible, and not from the Purchaser.

12. For cancellation charges in Section 5.3 - should include a schedule in
Exhibit I with firm $$ amounts.  Also - what is PNTP in the context of PNTP
+1 month?

13. In Section 5.4.4  are the "adjustments" are contemplated on a suspension
recission negotiated before the recission is effective?

14. In Section 6.1.3  if we are requiring an L/C from them on NTP, probably
should have a credit quality requirement.  Let's discuss.   Also in the
second to last sentence of that section, need to insert "by" before "the
reduction" and replace the "of" after "reduction" with "in."

15. In Section 6.4.3., there is a proviso that the Seller pays the Take Over
LDs if Seller does not dispute the amount.   If the amount is disputed, does
it move to arbitration?  Should they pay them and then dispute amounts per
Section 26.3?    Ditto 6.4.4.

16. Section 6.7.2 - Address should be for ENA as Agent for E-NEXT GENERATION
LLC, 1400 Smith, Houston, 77002.

17. Is a Preliminary Notice to Proceed required?  See Section 7.2.3.

18. The Quality plan in Section 9.3 discusses "ISO 9001, 1994" and any
conflict between the two.  Are there some words missing?

19. Article XX is great - no Purchaser indemnities!!

20. Article XXII - Assignment - see attached.  This form was highly
negotiated with GE - no other vendor has seen it.   For the special purpose
entity structure, we need at least to have the ability of the Lenders to
"foreclose" on the units.  Section 22.2(z) contemplates the transfer of a
project of which the subject units are a part.  There is a credit quality
rating of BBB- requirement as well as others.  I recommend we use the
attached as a template to discuss internally what your counterparty would
take - to make it as easy as possible to sell the project.  I would not offer
it up as-is - it is a starting point to talk to them about what they need.

21. In Section 25.1 - Notices - Add ENA as Agent - ditto 25.3.

Bart - thanks so much for your help.    Give me a call to discuss.


RIGZONE DAILY NEWS -- WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
Daily News from the worldwide upstream oil & gas industry
   to view the complete version, please go to:
   http://www.rigzone.com/newsletter_show.asp?n_id=186
------------------------------------------------------------


you bet!

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/11/2001 07:14 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: NPR Inquiry

Please, please keep Dave out of it.  Note to follow.

	Karen Denne
	05/11/2001 07:02 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, sgovenar@govadv.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NPR Inquiry

Ken Smith mentioned that Dave Parquet sent out an email about this issue --
do either of you have a copy of it?  If so, please forward to me.  Thanks! kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001
07:01 PM ---------------------------

"Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com> on 05/11/2001 03:29:29 PM
Please respond to "Ken Smith" <ken@kdscommunications.com>
To: "Karen Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>
cc: "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>

Subject: NPR Inquiry

I spoke with Elain Cory from San Francisco's NPR bureau, who  called Hedy
Govenar's office earlier today regarding a story she's doing on  plant siting
and air emission laws.? She's in Sacto today (currently  meeting with IEP),
but I told her that our experts are in SF rather than  Sacramento.? I also
told her I was checking with you to see if we could  offer someone (Dave
Parquet seems the logical choice); if he (or someone else)  is available, she
can meet with him on Monday.?
?
Give me a call ASAP so I can follow up with her or so you can  take the
appropriate steps.? I'll probably be on my cell -- (916)  947-0927.
?
Thanks,
Ken


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

Matthew Lenhart
01/24/2000 06:22 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: dopewars

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

"mlenhart" <mlenhart@mail.ev1.net> on 01/23/2000 06:34:13 PM
Please respond to mlenhart@mail.ev1.net
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, mmitchm@msn.com
cc:

Subject: dopewars

 - DOPEWARS.exe


FYI
----- Forwarded by John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/29/2001 11:02 AM -----

	Gordon Savage@EES
	01/24/2001 09:26 AM

		 To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E and SCE growth rates

Try number two....

I have also put the files on the r: drive in users/ G Savage

Call me (Ext 54166)  or Tamara Johnson (ext. 54007) if you have any
questions.

Reagrds,
Gord


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrane, Pamela
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Beltri, Angeles; Pham, Becky; Sheffield, Sandy; Frazier, Steve; Geaccone, Tracy; Erwin, Jill; Clement, Jody; Baxter, Bryce; Dawes, Cheryl; Horn, Cindy; McAndrew, Anna; Joslyn, Kate; Adams, Laurel; Leskowitz, Mark J.; Mcclure, Mark; Ratnala, Melissa K.; White, Melissa; Bruce, Michelle; Sammon, Robert; Shore, Geraldine; Millerchip, Rebecca; Wynne, Rita; Behn, Mary; Dworsky, Mildred; Shoup, Cynthia; Sengele, Julia; Chapman, Neil; Youngson, Karen; Davis, Kasey; Moseley, Debbie; Johnson, Alice; Burns, Donna; Bell, Stephen; Perkins, Raewyn; Schumacher, Phillip; Umphreys, Tom; Flanery, Sharon; Daniels, Diane; Lin, Judy; Centilli, Carolyn; Woerlen, Carol; Prendergast, Pat; Griffiths, David; Pool, Deelyn; Nightingale, Ron; Gunn, Cephus; Spoede, Amy; Cockrell, Rainier; Hanson, Kristen J.; Allen, Thresa A.; Lessor, James N.; Patterson, Grant; Hanslip, David; White, Angela; Dozier, Scott; Myers, Donnie; Garcia, Jorge A. ; Cash, Larry; Pham, Vivien; May, Kevin; Cagney, Patrick; Schwarzbach, Stephen; Blaskowski, Carrie; Mayeux, Cassandra; Vandor, David; Walters Jr., Harry; Kaster, Mei-Ling; Tran, Agatha; Tran, Joanne; Green, Alisa; Kathol, Sherri; Project Sunrise Reports Factory
Cc:	Johnson, Jan; Kanani, Pratish; Nelson, Emitra; Fennessy, Beverly; Schmidt, Mark; Frank, Mark; Reed, Jennifer; Chan, Li N.; Lykes, Kate; D'souza, Rena
Subject:	Project Sunrise September 30 Go-Live Status

GREAT NEWS !!!!

The second iteration of functional testing for Project Sunrise AR_AP and Earnings products successfully completed.  Users have signed off on the products and production loads are underway.

A number of users representing ENW, ENA, EES, ETS, EGM, and EBS participated in user testing; and more than 200 users have requested access to the data warehouse.  See business unit stats below.

EGM London Settlements	11
EGM Houston Settlements	10
ENA Houston Energy Operations	81
ENA Canada Accounting	5
EES Receivables Management	7
Enron Direct, Canada	3
Global Strategic Sourcing	22
EIM Mid Office Operations	20
EBS Trading Support	2
ETS Marketing, Accounting, Credit	33
ENW Financial Operations	20

Another round of thanks to everyone - technical developers, report developers, analysts, DBA, business analysts, ISC consultants, SMEs, business unit coordinators, and product managers -  who labored to deliver analysis and reporting tools that will greatly impact the everyday lives of Enron employees.   Great job team!!!!

Get ready,
	Get set,
		and stay tuned for the go.... message that will be delivered to data warehouse users on Monday.

Regards,
Pamela


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/19/2000
03:13 PM ---------------------------

Carlos Giron <cgiron@mindspring.com> on 11/18/2000 09:58:39 AM
To: Angela Teer-WIlliams <angela.teerwilliams@gte.net>, Darron C Giron
<dgiron@enron.com>, Glenn Bohan <gbohan@home.com>, Grant Whipple
<grant.w@mindspring.com>, Jennifer Iu <jenniferiu@yahoo.com>, Joe Dubret
<jdubret@flash.net>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: Fw:]

Return-Path: <mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org>
Received: from mail.datasync.com ([205.216.82.35]) by
fb04.eng00.mindspring.net (Mindspring Mail Service) with ESMTP id
t1bbnj.2deb.37kbi5a for <cgiron@mindspring.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:19:31
-0500 (EST)
Received: from AOAhusb1 ([206.251.166.92]) by mail.datasync.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3+Datasync) with SMTP id QAA18626 for <cgiron@mindspring.com>;
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:15:01 -0600
Message-ID: <000f01c050e2$ff64c900$5ca6fbce@AOAhusb1>
From: "Michael Massimi" <mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org>
To: <cgiron@mindspring.com>
Subject: Fw:
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:08:50 -0600
Organization: Audubon Institute/Aquarium of the Americas
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C050B0.AC709760"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

??? ???
----- Original Message -----
From: Rich  Toth
To: mmassimi@auduboninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:30 PM

?
?
 - Fword.wav


I knew we could find a practical use for Kristian's shoes.


Start Date: 1/6/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010611.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 413.54 / Final: 413.51)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/6/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


- Dot Com Entertainment Group.html


FYI.  We are under the mandate...no more screw ups.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
08:12 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
02/07/2001 08:00 AM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NEW COUNTERPARTY LIST

Make sure that everyone is using this.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001
07:56 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bianca Ornelas @ ENRON                           02/06/2001 03:45 PM

To: Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody
Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Ryder/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyle R
Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andres
Balmaceda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry
Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Liz
Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW COUNTERPARTY LIST

Here is what you have all been waiting for the new and improved C/P list.

ENJOY!


I am missing the following deals:

Jeff Richter-Amerex
Sell   American Electric Power  $525.00           SP 15           12/11/00-
12/11/00       50  on-peak     $.0075  fee

Sean Crandall/Dianna Scholtes- Amerex
Sell  Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.    $2000.00      MID C
12/12/00- 12/31/00   25  on-peak   $.0075  fee

Matt Motley- Prebon
Sell Constellation   $525.00       Mid-C         Q1'01   25 mw on-peak
Sell Nevada Power   $200.00    PV  Q2'01 25 mw on-peak
Sell Nevada Power   $295.00  PV Q3'01   25 mw on-peak

Matt Motley- Amerex
I am missing two deals...I will send you details in a second.

Thanks!!


John,  Very good idea to improve our integration as an organization.  If possible the best  timing is the last weekend in June.
 With all the changes we have made I suggest an update of the major issues/ opportunities in each one of our businesses.  Also an overall sense of business strategy and focus would be helpfull.  From an HR standpoint I am not sure all understand the PRC  as a development tool, as well as an evaluation mechanism.   We need to find ways to incentivate new and creative business development that may not result in short term results.  A discussion of the HR development is key.
From a location standpoint there is a very nice  guest ranch with great conference facilities that Enron has used in the past located in Jackson, WY. They can accomodate all our team and also have plenty of outside activities that include horseback riding in the mountains which is much less stressfull than climbing but you get the same views.

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/05/2001 16:29 CDT
To:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward D Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Sally Beck/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Glen Devries/ENRON@enronxgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/ENRON@enronxgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Hello everyone.

In December we decided to kill our planned offsite due to market volatility.  Louise and I would like to get everyone together offsite, probably in late June (once Louise is back from holiday (just kidding)).  I think it's time to go have a little fun with the group driving Enron's success.

I would like suggestions as to:

1)  Where to go.

2)  What should be the focus of the business meetings.

3)  Should we have business meetings or should we do something else (ie. climb a mountain)?  I'm not a strong bid on climbing a mountain.

4)  And any other ideas you have.

In addition I would like to start having staff meetings about once a month.  The first one will be Friday May 11th at 2:30 p.m.  Please add this to your schedule.  I have invited everyone who has P/L responsibility.  Portland, Calgary and Toronto will have to be on Video or Phone conference.

Regards

John


Please be prepared to make nominations on Tuesday.  We will vote on
Wednesday for a new Chair and Co-chair.  Thanks - Heidi


Thanx.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	04/12/2001 01:04 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: corporate resolutions and unanimous consents

Cheryl:

All resolutions and consents for Enron companies subject to oversight by our
group must be approved by Mark Taylor.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Thanks Marilou, but Ken Lay cannot attend.  We are having the Enron Board
meeting that day and Mr. Lay has a meeting scheduled all afternoon.

Rosalee

"Marilou Schopper" <MSCHOPPER@houston.org> on 04/26/2001 05:49:58 PM
To: <klay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: The Center For Houston's Future -- Finance Committee Meeting

This message is being sent to request the presence of
Mr. Lay at a meeting of the Finance Committee of The Center for
Houston's Future. Invitees of the meeting include Ben Love, Ned Holmes,
Gene Vaughan, Jim Royer, James Calloway and Marilou Schopper (Senior
Vice President of The Center).

The purpose of the meeting is to detail strategy for The Center for
Houston's Future capital campaign.

Tuesday, May 1, 12:30 p.m.
Houston Club -- President's Room

This meeting time would be directly after the monthly board meeting of
the Greater Houston Partnership.  No speaker is scheduled during lunch
for the Partnership's board meeting.  The Partnership board meeting will
be adjourned and the Finance Committee Meeting group will lunch/meet in
the President's Room.

Rosalee, I will call tomorrow to work out any details.  Thank you for
your help in scheduling.

> Marilou A. Schopper, APR
> Vice President, Communications
> Greater Houston Partnership
>
> Address:  1200 Smith, Suite 700, Houston, TX 77002-4400
> Phone: 713-844-3640
Pager:  713-710-5254
> Fax: 713-844-0240
> E-mail: mschopper@houston.org
>
> Please visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.houston.org
>
>


Anne,

I just got another phone call from Palo Alto.  They still have not received three of their confirms from deals done around the 20th of July.  They have ceased to do additional business with us until they receive these confirms.

thanks,

Kim


Please send me a summary.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yeung, Charles
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:39 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan; Comnes, Alan
Cc: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: FW: FERC Orders Standards Organization by March 15, and OtherMarket Design stuff

Smell of victory?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike McElhany
Sent: Thu 12/20/2001 8:23 AM
To: estf@nerc.com
Cc:
Subject: FERC Orders Standards Organization by March 15, and OtherMarket Design stuff

See attached


John Dushinske has a new cell phone number.  402-680-9040.  Please make this change on your phone list.  Thanks!!

Rosemary Gracey
Marketing - 402/398-7431
rosemary.gracey@enron.com


NOTE: IF ANY PART OF THIS MESSAGE IS UNCLEAR, A TABULAR LISTING CAN BE FOUND
AT http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_133.htm.

April 16, 2001
Notice No. 01-133

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
William B. Meyer Warehouse ) New Haven, CT

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to amend Supplement No. 2 8Licensed Warehouses for Copper8 of the
Grade 1 Copper Futures Contract.  The approved amendment delists the William
B. Meyer, Inc. COMEX Licensed Warehouse for Copper located at 2 Poplar Street
in New Haven, Connecticut.  The approved amendment is effective immediately.

Below is Supplement No. 2, &Licensed Warehouses for Copper8, which has been
amended to reflect the delisting of this warehouse facility.

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

Proposed Amendments
Underlining indicates additions, brackets [ ] indicate deletions
              Copper Supplement             Copper Supplement
      No. 2

COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC.
LICENSED WAREHOUSES FOR COPPER

[NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT]   FACILITIES          COMPUTER CODE

[ William B. Meyer, Inc.----------------------- 2 Poplar Street         2204 ]
[ P.O. Box 4206 ]    New Haven, Conn. ]
[ Bridgeport, Conn. 06607 ]
[  (Orders: (203) 375-5801) ]

STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT

William B. Meyer, Inc.--------------------------Long Beach Boulevard    2202
  P.O. Box 4206     Stratford, Conn.
  Bridgeport, Conn. 06607
  (Orders: (203) 375-5801)

CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY

  South Jersey Port Corporation-----------------Second & Beckett Streets 2602
  P.O. Box 129     Camden, NJ
  Camden, NJ 08101
  (Orders:  (609) 541-8500)

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND

Edgemere Terminals, Inc.------------------------8004 Stansbury Road 3402
  8004 Stansbury Road    Baltimore, Md.
  Baltimore, Md. 21222
  (Orders:  (410) 282-4420)

Locust Industries, Inc.-------------------------4747 Hollins Ferry Road 3606
  4747 Hollins Ferry Road          Baltimore, Md.
  Baltimore, Md. 21227
  (Orders:  (410) 247-9520)

Madison Warehouse Corporation------------------ 7330 Carbide Road 3204
  7330 Carbide Road                         Baltimore, Md.
  Baltimore, Md. 21226
  (Orders:  (410) 360-2300)

NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Virginia International Terminals, Inc.----------Warehouse Nos. 3 & 5 4202
  601 World Trade Center   7737 Hampton Boulevard
  Norfolk, Va. 23510    Norfolk, Va.
  (Orders:  Va. (757) - 440-7206)

CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

South Carolina State Ports Authority------------Columbus Street Terminal  3702
  P.O. Box 817     Union Pier Terminal
  Charleston, South Carolina 29402  Charleston, S.C.
  (Orders: 800-845-7106)

ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

Madison Warehouse Corporation-------------------4600 Goodfellow Blvd. 4408
  4300 Planned Industrial Drive   St. Louis, Mo
  St. Louis, Missouri  63120
  (Orders:  (314) 383-4300)                     .

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

Hayes/Dockside, Inc.----------------------------7200 North Peters Street 5206
  P.O. Box 53315    Arabi, La.
  New Orleans, La. 70153   6025 River Road   5210(Orders:  (504) 897-5020)
Marrero, La.

AMARILLO, TEXAS

Dalby Moving & Storage Co., Inc.------  401 North Arthur Street   5602
  P.O. Box 78450    Amarillo, Texas
  Tucson, Arizona  85703   415 North Grand Avenue    5606
  (Orders:  (520) 887-3606)   Amarillo, Texas

EL PASO, TEXAS

El Paso Terminal Warehouse, Inc.----------------5850 Welch Avenue, #1   5804
  P.O. Box 9248     El Paso, Texas
  El Paso, Texas 79983    5850 Welch Avenue, #2   5806
  (Orders:  (915) 772-2758)   El Paso, Texas

TUCSON, ARIZONA

Arizona Commodity Storage , Inc.----  601 East 24th Street   5502
  2724 Meadow Creek Court   Tucson, Arizona
  Park City, Utah 84060         850 East Teton    5506
  (Orders:  (435) 649-3333)   Tucson, Arizona
      2004 S. Euclid Avenue   5508
      Tucson, Arizona

Southwest Commodity Warehouses, Inc.----------  4619 North Highway Drive  5902
  P.O. Box 78450    Tucson, Arizona
  Tucson, Arizona 85703-8450   1 Jacobus Road    6202
  (Orders:  (520) 887-3606    San Manuel, Arizona

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH

Utah Commodity Storage, Inc.--------------------Building 1 & 2   5702
  2724 Meadow Creek Court    1051 South Industrial Parkway
  Park City, Utah 84060    Clearfield, Utah
  (Orders:  (435) 649-3333)   11th Street-Section E-12 5704
      Freeport Center
      Clearfield, Utah
      Building H-9  5706
      Freeport Center
      Clearfield, Utah

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-133)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
07/12/2000 12:19 PM
To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Positions for NYMEX Exemption Application

Please disregard the first e-mail I sent.  I am sorry for the confusion.
This file has the correct positions, both NYMEX and OTC, that you requested.

Thanks,

Errol


Sheila handled FV.  Today was the first day I had seen them.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 02:30:00 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

We "took" her from El Paso, not that we like to steal from our customers (we
may have another opening, by the way!!).  She's been here a couple of
months.

Just to be sure, I never saw these before correct?  She's going to do this
job but Lee thought I had seen everything before and I could just sign off

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Danetta worked it for the  Fountain Valley project.  How long has she been
here?  I didn't know there was anyone other than you.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 02:24:25
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay, unless I've lost my mind, I've never seen these docs before.  What
deal
was it on.  I don't have anything on CA Development.  I don't remember
executing any attorney's opinions?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Yes, this stuff is for the purchaser's bank.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 01:45:44
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay:  Is there anything different from the forms you and I worked on
earlier.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:32 PM
To: danetta.beaushaw@ps.ge.com
Cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; lee.johnson@ps.ge.com;
Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Danetta,

I heard a rumor that you are the one to look at this stuff.  I know that
you recently went through the process in connection with the Fountain
Valley transaction.  I'm happy to serve up those forms to Freshfields if
that makes it is easier for you.

My number is 713 345 7566.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/02/2001 10:09 AM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Kent,

I don't know whether Lee has mentioned the Delta Power deal that we are
working on.  We are taking 4 turbines and putting them in an LLC, and
selling some of the interest in the LLC to Delta Power.  Three of the
turbines are turbines formerally known as LV Co Gen turbines, and we are
buying new LM's to replace the ones we are using here.  In any event, Delta
Power is financing the deal, and they have asked that we get GE sign off on
the attached documents.  Therefore, I would be interested in your response
to the attached.

I understand that Lee is in New Orleans today, but I'll send him a copy
anyway.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/01/2001 05:10:38 PM

To:   "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "John Keffer
      (E-mail)" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
      <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Rick Vicens (E-mail)"
      <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
      <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc:   "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com if you need assistance.

As discussed during our call earlier this afternoon, please find attached
for onward transmission to GE a draft of (i) the GE Consent and Agreement
and (ii) the GE legal opinion.

Kind regards
Isabel

(See attached file: NY003700033.DOC)
(See attached file: NY003699615.DOC)


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042906.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  38.00 / Final:  12.80)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 194.00 / Final: 175.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TRADING_SC: APX1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   4.64 / Final:   4.06)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  43.10 / Final:  37.51)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:   4.81 / Final:   4.78)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Group,
Two quick things...

First- from volume management:
When scheduling a service customer such as Harbor or WheelabratorShasta,
Arco, Tosco, etc. we need to be sure to schedule using the customer ID in
CAPS.  Otherwise RT has no generation and we are considered short (please see
myself or Kourtney with questions).

Second- from the preschedulers:
If we sit at Lisa or Stacy's desk, please be sure to log out of the computer
and their phone.   Their computers are not necessarily for Real-Time use,
but I would like to be sure that we can continue to use these computers at
night.  If they aren't happy with the cleanliness of their desk, or with
having to reset their computers each morning, etc...we will probably lose
this priviledge.

Other than that,

Keep up the good work.

Thanks,
Bill


I'll actually be in Sacramento tomorrow (need to hear the hub-bub at the gas
version of the energy war crimes trials taking place up there tomorrow).
Steinberg's hearing starts at 9, so I should be able to pop by at 1 if that
works for you.

Best,
Jeff

	Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@cmta.net>
	04/17/2001 06:44 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Meeting Invitation for 4/18/1

Let's just talk sometime tomorrow morning, if you are available.....how about
10:00?

Cheers,
Dorothy

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> Greetings Dorothy:
>
> Hope all is well.  I can participate in your meeting tomorrow.  Is it
> possible to participate by conference call, or would you prefer that folks
> attend in person?  Just  let me know.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>                     Loretta
>                     Macktal              To:     "Allen, Tom"
<tom.allen@mirant.com>,
>                     <lmacktal@cmt        "Baker, Carolyn"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
>                     a.net>               "Gough, Kassandra"
<kgough@calpine.com>,
>                                          "Parquet, David"
<david.parquet@enron.com>,
>                     04/16/2001           "Stout, John"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>
>                     03:27 PM             cc:     "Rothrock, Dorothy"
<drothrock@cmta.net>,
>                                          "Stewart, Jack"
<jstewart@cmta.net>, "McCrea,
>                                          Keith" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>
>                                          Subject:     Meeting Invitation
for 4/18/1
>
>
> To:     Tom Allen, Mirant
>           Kasssandra Gough, CalPine
>           David Parquet, Enron
>           John Stout, Reliant
>           Carolyn Baker, Duke Energy
>
> From: Dorothy Rothrock, CMTA
>
> CMTA is reviewing it's policy position on wholesale market reforms and
> price caps going into the summer 2001. We would welcome and value your
> input and expertise at a meeting this week.
>
> Date:  April 18, 2001
> Time:  1:00 to 2:00 pm
> Place:  CMTA Exec Conference Room, 980 Ninth Street, Sacramento
>
> You are invited to attend or send a representative.  If you can do
> neither, I would like to talk to you at a convenient time before the
> meeting.
>
> Call or email Loretta at 916-441-5420 or lmacktal@cmta.net to RSVP or
> set up a time for a phone call.
>
> Thanks,
> Dorothy Rothrock


Regan and Jane,

This note is written to request the migration of data contained in path O:common/Erms/erms_adm/Netco to the Netco/UBS environment before the testing period commencing February 4, 2002.  This folder contains models/tools used by the Risk Management group to support the trading activity in Natural Gas.  We have support from Zhiyong Wei and Hal McKinney in the conversion of the data to reflect the Netco/UBS environment, and we are now asking that the directory in whole be moved to the Netco/UBS environment. Please contact me at 3-9686 if there are questions or concerns with this request.

O'Neal


Hey,

work is going great.  i am trading now - wooohoooo!.  I am really enjoying
the new position.  a lot more responsibility.
i am going to the rodeo tonight and tomorrow , so that should be fun.  that
will bring the grand total to 5.

how are things going with you and the fam?

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 03/03/2000 03:52:37 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Ner-
Hi there guy.  How is everything going?  I haven't talked to you for quite
some time.  How's work and everything else?  Anything new and exciting going
on?  I would love to hear from you if you get a chance today.

Miss ya,
Dee


Russ,

We will send Liz, Mary, Susan, and Sabrae to this training.  Thanks.

D

Russ Severson
09/12/2000 03:25 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Daren

The number of interested people turned out to be larger than the room can
handle.  Can you just send 3 or 4 for this meeting and I will set up a
secondary date for the others.

Thanks
Russ
x37386
---------------------- Forwarded by Russ Severson/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
09/08/2000 02:14 PM
To: Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz Bellamy/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabrae
Zajac/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Hadix/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eddie
Janzen/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Russ,

I would like for the following people from the Texas region to attend:

Liz Bellamy
Sabrae Zajak
Mary Poorman
Susan Hadix
Tom Acton
Mark McCoy
Eddie Janzen

Let me know if this group is too large and move some to a later date.  Thanks.

D

Russ Severson
09/08/2000 08:53 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA TRAINING

I will be giving a training session on Wed   9/13/00  in 21C2 from 3:00-4:30
pm.
I would like for you to send to the class any new logistics personnel that
you might think could use a Sitara overview.
If someone cannot make it at this time, let me know their names and I will
try to schedule something for them at a later time.

If possible, please send me a note on who might be attending, so I can get an
approximate head count.

Call me or e-mail me if you have any questions

Russ
x37386


Hi Kate!
This deal needs to be changed to CAISO energy.  Also, I will be faxing the
list of West Daily Deals that need to be changed to "no confirm".
Thanks for your help!
Kim


-----Original Message-----
From: Polsky, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:20 PM
To: Grigsby, Mike
Subject: ExpansionSummary 10-11-01

Here is the raw data file.

 ExpansionSummary 10-11-01


Financial Desk
State's Utilities Could Be in Hot Water as Bills Are Due Power: Whether they
can collect funds for escalating costs is a question that worries Wall
Street, others.
CHRIS KRAUL

09/22/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page A-1
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
As the meter runs on California's electricity crisis, shock over this
summer's price spikes is giving way to a new concern: uncertainty over
whether and how the state's three investor-owned utilities can collect the
staggering amounts in power costs they haven't been allowed to pass through
to consumers.
The unanswered question is how high the bill--now $4 billion and
counting--will go, and whether consumers will foot all or part of it. And
that there are no easy answers--perhaps short of an overhaul of the state's
deregulated power market, or legislation from officials seemingly reluctant
to act--only adds to the growing anxiety.
Rate freezes in effect at Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric
and San Diego Gas & Electric, which serve about three-quarters of the state's
residents and businesses, are forcing the utilities to borrow an estimated $1
billion a month to cover their added wholesale costs. Those loans are
draining the companies' resources and threatening their financial structure,
analysts say.
The rising unpaid balance presents a longer-term burden that worries Wall
Street, the state's business interests and, of course, the utilities. If
passed along to consumers, the amount could ultimately negate the promised
benefits of cheap energy that were the reason for being for the landmark
deregulation of California's electricity industry. But making the utilities
absorb the entire "undercollections" would strike a grievous financial blow
to the companies.
The crisis also has created a potential time bomb for shareholders of parent
companies Edison International and PG&E Corp. Skyrocketing wholesale
electricity costs are canceling out deregulation's underlying assumption of
low-cost wholesale energy--and the projected generous retail margins with
which utilities were to pay off nuclear plants and other uneconomical assets.
The deregulation law gave utilities until March 2002 to complete the payoff,
when open-market conditions would take over in their service areas. But with
wholesale electricity costs where they are, the "stranded asset" balances are
growing instead of shrinking--and posing an enormous potential hit for
shareholders, who would have to absorb the remaining "bad asset" costs after
the deadline passes.
Whether the companies' shareholders or ratepayers--or both--end up footing
the undercollection bill, all Californians could pay in the long run,
analysts say, if current market problems remain unresolved and the state is
seen as a less attractive place in which to do business.
How will it all shake out? Wall Street is as much in the dark as
Californians, said Lori Woodland, an analyst with Fitch Inc. of Chicago, one
of three debt-rating agencies to recently lower their outlooks for Southern
California Edison, PG&E, SDG&E and their parent companies.
"It's not clear how regulators view this issue," Woodland said. "They may
permit the utilities to recover their costs [from ratepayers]; they may not.
That's a big uncertainty, and it may remain this way for months. Meanwhile,
power prices are very high, and significant amounts of money are flowing out
the door of the utilities."
The uncertain prospects for collecting those billions of dollars also affect
stock prices, and PG&E in particular has slumped in recent days as the
implications register with investors. From a high of $31.64 on Sept. 11, PG&E
shares have dropped to Thursday's close of $23.19 on the New York Stock
Exchange.
Amid the finger pointing and doubts, many wonder if electricity deregulation
itself could be junked and the state's power industry re-regulated. Others
suggest that rate freezes be extended indefinitely or hope that the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission now investigating the California electricity
market will take corrective action to make it all better.
Although the parties involved all seem fearful of the dimension of the crisis
and doubtful of any near-term solution, consensus couldn't be less evident
among the major players on how to deal with it. Although all three utilities
agree the current market isn't working, they have not come forward with a
common plan to solve the crisis and aren't working on one, sources say.
Partial lifting of the rate freezes is advocated by PG&E Corp. and Sempra
Energy, parent of SDG&E, the first state utility to pay off its stranded
costs and thus be allowed to fully pass along wholesale costs to customers.
The state Legislature has since stepped in to freeze SDG&E rates after a
political firestorm fed by customer protests over bills that doubled and even
tripled during the summer.
Lifting the rate freeze would stem the tide of electricity undercollections,
a sum the utilities realize is not necessarily collectible in the current
political climate.
"We have to fix these retail rates, which mask the true cost of electricity
and which are creating the shortfall," said SDG&E President Edwin A. Guiles.
In San Diego, for example, the average price paid by SDG&E customers zoomed
from 11 cents per kilowatt-hour last year to 28 cents at its highest point
this summer, before the Legislature stepped in to cap the rates, bringing the
average price paid down to about 10 cents.
So tinkering with the rate freeze could be politically hazardous.
"The pain we saw in San Diego this summer is something we want to avoid for
our customers in Northern and Central California," said PG&E spokesman Jon
Tremayne.
PG&E is expected soon to formally petition the state Public Utilities
Commission to lift its rate freeze. The San Francisco-based utility argues
that the $2.8-billion value of its Northern California hydroelectric
properties, which under deregulation it is required to divest, would erase
its stranded costs and make it eligible to pass along wholesale costs to
consumers.
Southern California Edison's chief financial officer, Jim Scilacci, said the
utility could possibly be eligible to lift the rate freeze later this year if
planned asset sales bring high enough prices.
But with the legally mandated rate freeze in effect in San Diego, observers
doubt that the state would let PG&E and Edison revert to market prices.
In response, some consumer advocates are saying, in effect: Let the
utilities, which ignored warnings of the electricity shortages at the root of
the summer's price spikes, lie in the beds they made and pay the unforeseen
costs of deregulation themselves.
"Essentially this is the result of a deal gone wrong. It's buyer's remorse,"
said Michael Shames of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San Diego
watchdog group. "The utilities cut a deal, and now they don't like the terms
of the deal and they want out of it."
Somewhat more flexible is Ed Yates, senior vice president of the
Sacramento-based California League of Food Processors, whose energy-intensive
industry could be devastated by the full brunt of high wholesale energy
costs.
"What frightens us is that the utilities and the state could declare the rate
freeze over and we'd have a San Diego situation," Yates said, referring to
how the rising summer power costs made some San Diego County agricultural
products noncompetitive. "What we want is rate stability. But I don't see a
solution. There are powerful interests at work who don't agree on the goal."
State officials are divided, with some including PUC President Loretta Lynch
looking to the federal government to impose order. Gov. Gray Davis has
discussed holding an energy summit next month to try to hash out solutions,
but no date or agenda have been set.
"The governor is obviously aware of the problems that California utilities
are facing and continues to be committed to making deregulation work and is
calling on everyone involved to act in a responsible way," said spokesman
Steve Maviglio, adding that Davis has set aside much of October to work on
the problem.
Lynch made it clear she will be unreceptive to any solution that would have
consumers absorbing all of the undercollections and that resolving the
utilities' huge debts must come as part of a comprehensive overhaul of
California's dysfunctional electricity market.
"I don't think there is a simple solution. The utilities have a problem, I
agree, but the resolution is much more complex than having the ratepayer eat
the bill," Lynch said. "The answer lies in a broader solution of addressing
the wholesale energy market."
Unclear is how long Wall Street would wait for some kind of resolution before
downgrading utilities' debt, the next step after the negative outlook
revisions.
"There are obviously many challenges presented to the power industry," said
Standard & Poor's David Bodek. "The costs are very high and at the end of the
day have to be borne by someone. If it's the utilities, there are financial
implications that could impact credit quality."


The most recent news is that Carol has been admitted to the hospital and is
in labor - things are looking ok.  I'll let you know if I hear anything new.


Did y'all export, etc.?

Stacey
-----Original Message-----
From: Abel, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Albrecht, Kristin; Mills, Scott; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Keiser, Kam; Evans, Casey; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Stevens, Martha; Killen, Faith; Day, Misti; Glover, Sheila; Carrington, Clara; Horn, Cindy; Oliver, David; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, D. Todd; Prejean, Frank; Swinney, John; Best, John; Thomas, Sheri; Moscoso, Michael E.; Hanson, Kristen J.; Mao, Shari; Miralles, Albert; Loibl, Kori; Perchal, Cheryl; Gardner, Scott; Reeves, Kathy; Gillis, Brian
Cc: Wilson, Shona; Ayala, Susie; Trevino, Susan; Considine, Keith
Subject: 12/31/01 DPR

We are trying to wrap up the year end reporting this week.  Please let me know if you are still having issues reporting and/or when to expect the year end data.  Some of you may not be familiar with the "export" process to get data to the Consolidated DPR.  If not, please call me and I can help.

David/Cindy- we will only be reporting the European numbers for the ECTRIC business.

Thanks,

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


Announcement for E220-1: Corporate Financial Reporting:

Greetings,
I am in need of a class representative.  If one of you is interested in this
role, please send me an e-mail.
Kindly,
Salvador


Hi guys,

I thought it would be a good idea to come up with an plan of action to get
the facility agreements closed out.  From what I can tell here, the ESA and
City of Austin deals are the most time sensitive.


i don't know.  i only have 40 bucks.


Carol Huston
10087 88th St N
Seminole, FL 33777-1809
carolhuston@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Carol Huston


If you are interested in attending this luncheon, please RSVP via email (sanchezm@rice.edu) no later than Tuesday, October 30 10:00 AM.  There is only room for 8 guests, so it is first come, first serve.
The luncheon starts at 11:30 and is held at the Houston Club, located at 811 Rusk between Travis & Milam.
Houston Club Distinguished Speaker Luncheon
Wednesday, October 31
Guest Speaker: Michael D. Capellas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Compaq Computer Corporation
"Houston, Compaq and Technology"
Houston is not only the energy capital of the world, but there is growing recognition nationwide of the important role Houston plays in technology in a number of technology sectors.  The crown jewel in our technology sector is Compaq Computer Corporation under the leadership of Michael D. Capellas.  No sector of the economy has spurred greater growth and recently, greater volatility, but has greater long-term promise than the technology sector.
Mr. Capellas will address these and other issues when he speaks on technology in Houston.  Michael D. Capellas is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Compaq Computer Corporation.  A leading expert in information technology and supply chain management, he joined Compaq in 1998 as Chief Information Officer.  He was named Chief Executive Officer in July of 1999 and Chairman in September 2000.
Immediately prior to joining Compaq, Mr. Capellas held senior positions at Oracle Corporation and SAP America.  At Oracle, he served as Senior Vice President and General Manager for the company's global energy business.  As SAP America, he was Director of Supply Chain Management.  Prior to joining SAP, he was managing partner of Benchmarking Partners, a leading information management-consulting firm.
From 1981-1996, Mr. Capellas held several senior positions at Schlumberger Ltd., including serving as the company's first Corporate Director for Information Systems.  He also served as Controller and Treasurer of Schlumberger's operation in Asia Pacific, Chief Financial Officer of Dowell Schlumberger Inc., a joint venture between Schlumberger and Dow Chemical; and a senior position in operations management at Schlumberger's Fairchild Semiconductor unit.
Mr. Capellas began his career at Republic Steel Corporation.  He is a 1976 graduate of Kent State University.  He is a member of the Boards of Directors of Dynegy, Inc. and the Boys and Girls Club of America.  He also serves on the Executive Committee of the Computer Systems Policy Project and is a member of The Business Council.
Maria Sanchez
Recruiting Coordinator, Career Planning Center
Jesse H. Jones School of Management
Phone: (713) 348-5246
Fax: (713) 348-5838
sanchezm@rice.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 02:35 PM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
12/18/2000 08:32 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of FERC's 12- 15 order on California Markets

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000 08:41 AM
---------------------------

Mary Hain
12/17/2000 05:20 PM
To: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES,
Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, gfergus@brobeck.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, Tom
Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Paul
Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sean
Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elliot
Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Murray P O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT, Todd
Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Shields/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas, Stephen
Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of FERC's 12- 15 order on California Markets


Dear Mr. Krishna -

If it is convenient for you, Dr. Lay is suggesting that you meet on Friday,
January 28 at 3:45 p.m. at the Hotel Meierhof.  Dr. Lay will meet you in the
lobby and you can meet at a table in the restaurant at the hotel.

Please advise if this works with your schedule.

Rosalee

"CM" <cmkrishna@bangaloreit.com> on 01/12/2000 02:01:29 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: ksiidc@vsnl.com
Subject:

Dear Mr.Kenneth L Lay

     An important message for you

To
Dr.Kenneth L Lay
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Enron Corp.
USA

 - att1.htm
 - davosmeeting.doc


The following parcel has been rejected :

Parcel: 8865
Contract Number: 08076

Path: Kingsgate to Malin
Quantity: 15000
Min Release Quantity: 15000
Begin Date: 12/4/2001
End Date: 11/1/2002

The prearranged replacement shipper is: Canadian Natural Resources Limited

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


We may want to add other issues and there may be some overlap between the PX
filing and the EOB filing.  Sorry this is so rough.

Protest of PX filing

? FERC should reject the PX,s price caps because
? Energy Markets are competitive in the West ) 20 loads and 40 sellers.
? Say what we and EPSA said in San Diego case and say that high prices are
not due to exercise of market power, they are the product of scarcity and the
failure of the IOUs to hedge in the forward market and their underscheduling
in the PX day ahead market.
? FERC had to administer the price caps for the gas industry and they caused
terrible problems ) list a few of FERC,s nightmares FERC as reminders.
? The Cal PX shouldn,t be able to do this on a whim and indefinitly.
? Cal PX should have to substantiate the request, which they haven,t.  ISO
and PX haven,t had the same prices as the ISO for years and they didn,t have
the problems described in the filing.  PX proposed this for political reasons.
? If two parties want to agree ) why shouldn,t PX match ) they have to be
willing buyers, have the ability to go to the ISO real time market.  Parties
should be able to buy outside of the PX ) we don,t want to create a monopoly
for the bilateral market.
? Recognize that the FERC may allow price caps, if they do
? FERC should have same cap they allow for New York, PJM.  Inconsistent with
other markets, including Canadian markets over which Commission has no
jurisdiction.
? $250 Price cap in California is not enough to incent generation to be built
because it does not allow a return on an investment in generation
? FERC should consider allowing a cap based on the price at which
interruptible load is willing to be cut - $1,500.
? Could we make the argument that capping the price in the PX will drive up
the price by making participants bid up to the cap?  Isn,t this what happened
in California?  Ask for Seabron to help?

Protest of the EOB filing

? FERC should reject it
? Cross reference anything we said with respect to the PX filing that
applies
? Analysis ) provided by Seabron Adamson of why we can,t exercise market
power the way the EOB says we have.
? The EOB,s filing confuses bid and price caps. After all, who would buy in
the bilateral market if they can go to the ISO and the PX get power for
less?
? Attach the joint resolution telling the ISO to show cause why it should not
lower the price caps to $100/MW.  Attach the EOB vote not to reaffirm
directors. Of ISO and PX.  If in response to the EOB,s show cause order, the
ISO lowers prices to $100/MW and the PX follows suit - as they have indicated
they will in their filing and as the EOB vote on their directors would force
them - California generators will stop producing because if they generate
they will not be able to recover their variable costs.  Generators outside of
California will not sell into California markets because they would not
recover their variable costs and they could sell their power elsewhere and
recover their variable costs.  Therefore, the liquidity of the California
market will dry up and reliability problems will occur.
? We &told you so8 FERC
?  the EOB thinks they have much more power than you allowed them to have as
illustrated by their issuing orders to show cause to the ISO to lower the
price cap and
? the EOB is now making the ISO and PX unindependent by not reaffirming Board
members because they won,t vote for lower price  caps.  This is ultra vires
in that the EOB,s power is supposed to relate to retail jurisdiction, not
setting wholesale price caps (not just bid caps) for the entire California
market.

Susan J Mara@EES
09/08/2000 08:16 AM
To: Elsa Piekielniak/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES
cc: rcarroll@bracepatt.com
Subject: [Fwd: FW: You should look at this -- Reuters on $100/MWh price caps
for ISO and PX]

Price cap aand Oversight Board frivolities
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/08/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 09/07/2000 11:07:54 PM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: smara@enron.com
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: FW: You should look at this -- Reuters on $100/MWh price caps
for ISO and PX]

More bad stuff on the way...

Carl

Return-Path: <fpickel@tca-us.com>
Received: from nautilus.shore.net (nautilus.shore.net [207.244.124.104]) by
shell2.shore.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA13893 for
<cfi1@shell2.shore.net>; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:49:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mailnweb.tca-us.com) [207.31.208.21]  by nautilus.shore.net
with esmtp (Exim) for cfi1@shore.net id 13XFAY-00058W-00; Thu, 07 Sep 2000
23:49:38 -0400
Received: by mailnweb.tca-us.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<RLG1Y5TH>; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:48:44 -0400
Received: from tcaus (ZZYXP3DELL [172.16.121.84]) by mailnweb.tca-us.com with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id
RLG1Y5TF; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:48:32 -0400
Reply-To: <fpickel@tca-us.com>
From: "Fred Pickel" <fpickel@tca-us.com>
To: "Richard Tabors \(E-mail\)" <tabors@tca-us.com>,        "Scott Englander
\(E-mail\)" <sle@tca-us.com>,        "Narasimha Rao \(E-mail\)"
<nrao@tca-us.com>,        "Judith Cardell \(E-mail\)",        "Ellen
[Banaghan] Wolfe \(E-mail\)" <ellen@tca-us.com>,        "Carl Imparato
\(E-mail\)" <cfi1@tca-us.com>
Subject: FW: You should look at this -- Reuters on $100/MWh price caps for
ISO and PX
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:45:44 -0400
Message-ID: <000c01c01947$ef44a680$547910ac@com.tcaus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01C01926.68330680"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

Oh  boy!? What a mess.
?

?Frederick H. Pickel,  Ph.D
?Vice President
?Tabors Caramanis &  Associates
?Los Angeles, California
?& Cambridge,  Massachusetts
?email: fpickel@tca-us.com
?alternate email:  fred.pickel@ALUM.mit.edu
?tel +1 (323) 937-7920
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Van Vactor  [mailto:svv@econ.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:44  PM
To: Lisa_G_Urick@calpx.com
Cc: Dona K.  Lehr
Subject: You should look at this

?

By Nigel Hunt

?? LOS  ANGELES, Sept 7 (Reuters) - The cap on wholesale power prices in
California  could be cut for the third time this year, this time to $100 per
megawatt hour  after starting the year at $750 per MWh.

?? The  state's Electricity Oversight Board (EOB) is to make a request to the
California  Independent System Operator (ISO) within the next few days on the
issue  following a resolution by the state's lawmakers last week.

?? "We will  make a formal request within the next few days," EOB Executive
Director Gary  Heath said.

?? An  assembly joint resolution approved last week called on the EOB to
direct the ISO  to "show cause why the price caps in the ancillary services
and real-time energy  markets should not be lowered to $100 per megawatt-hour
immediately and continue  until at least March 31, 2001."

?? The cap  currently stands at $250 per MWh after previous cuts from $750 to
$500 and $500  to $250 amid growing consumer unrest about skyrocketing
electricity bills and  allegations of possible price gouging by generators.

?? The  assembly resolution says the EOB should report back to the
legislature by  December 1, 2000.

?? There was  heavy criticism of the ISO, which controls most of the state's
power grid, by  lawmakers this year at its governing board twice rejected
resolution to cut the  cap to $250 from $500 before finally agreeing to such
a move.

?? Heath  noted the EOB at a meeting last week decided not to approve the
appointment or  reappointment of 13 members of the ISO board and 12 members
of the California  Power Exchange's governing board.

?? "We are  trying to place people who are a bit more mindful of the
implications of board  decisions on Californian consumers," Heath said.

?? Existing  board members will remain in office until replacements can be
appointed.

?? Heath  said that some individuals who were rejected may eventually be
approved and the  EOB was rather making a statement about the performance of
the two boards.

?? "The  board was making a very clear statement that we are not satisfied
with the the  efforts of the ISO or PX governing boards to proect Californian
consumers,"  Heath said.

?? Wholesale  power prices in California soared to record levels during a
heatwave in June and  many customers in San Diego faced a tripling in their
electricity bills.

? Supporters of  cutting the cap believe the power market is not "workably
competitive" and  prices rose to excessive levels during the heatwave,
putting an unfair burden on  both ratepayers and shareholders of investor
owned utilities.

?? Opponents  have been led by independent power producers who have argued a
lower cap could  make it more difficult for the state to import power at
times of shortage.

?? Emergency  legislation signed into law by Calif. Gov. Gray Davis on
Wednesday imposed a  price cap on how much San Diego residents should pay
which was less than a third  of the current "free market" rate.

? Customers of  San Diego Gas and Electric, a unit of Sempra Energy <SRE.N>,
had been  exposed to market based prices under the terms of California's
power  deregulation.

?? Rates for  customers of California's other two investor owned utilities,
Edison  International's <EIX.N> Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp.'s
<PCG.N> Pacific Gas and Electric, are frozen.

?? A  spokesman for the California ISO was not immediately available for
comment.

?? ((--Los  Angeles bureau + 1 213 955 6752))


This message is a request to Enron to abandon the wind power project which
would desecrate sacred burial and cultural sites and threaten endangered
species and the scenic area in the Columbia River Gorge area.  The area,
located near Celilo Falls and the confluence of the Columbia River with the
John Day and Deschutes Rivers is renowned for its environmental, scenic,
Indigenous and European cultural and historical significance.


I was wondering what I was going to do in my spare time!

From: Carlos Sole on 03/27/2001 08:04 AM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Great News

Just what I wanted to hear, I think I'm ready to go meet Kendall and start
driving over railroad tracks


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011412.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey W White/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000
09:26 AM ---------------------------

Clara Carrington
10/05/2000 04:31 PM
To: Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Estimate Power Cashflows

---------------------- Forwarded by Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000
04:30 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Reeves
10/03/2000 02:58 PM
To: Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Estimate Power Cashflows

Note:  Our power curve is a critical component of the cashflows and this has
not yes been finalized.