Features: angels find investment opportunities abound and mobile
wireless operators explore the Internet. Broker reports: independent
Wall Street guru Charles Payne explains why the Street will rally on,
21st century energy considerations, and more.

Don't forget: you can see the most queried tickers, best selling
reports, and hot sectors by clicking here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/cs_hot.asp?target=%2Fstocks%2Fcompanyinformation%2Fanalystresearch%2Fwhatshot

***************************************************************
You are receiving this mail because you have registered for
Multex Investor. To unsubscribe, see bottom of this message.
***************************************************************

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Parents - Before you do anything else today, check to see that you have
enough coverage to protect your family's financial and education needs.
Check out our life insurance calculator to determine your coverage needs.
Get no-obligation Term Life QUOTES from multiple carriers. COMPARE &
SAVE. Research & Apply. Rely on Insurance.com, backed by a trusted
name - Fidelity Investments.

http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3267838;5840728;w?http://www.insurance.com/entry.asp?sid=3786
==============================================================

Below
--------

- Investment ideas
- Broker and third-party research
- Online advice and chats
- Free and sponsored reports

Investment ideas
-----------------------------------------

1. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Mobile phone makers eye wireless Internet opportunity
Companies look past current troubles toward growing the mobile data market

by John Filar Atwood, equity research columnist

Worsening economic conditions have caused a major strategic shift in the mobile
handset industry. The segments top companies have begun to de-emphasize phone
sales and are eyeing the wireless Internet as a key driver of future revenues.

Its no surprise given recent industry performance. Third quarter handset shipments
were down by 10% over last year. Motorolas (MOT) sales fell by 22% in the quarter,
and Ericssons (ERICY) phone operations have been so damaging to its bottom line
that the company finally moved them into a joint venture with Sony (SNE).

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4447&nd=1126

2. INVESTMENT IDEAS
Angelic missions rising
As VC funding slows, angel investors find new wings.

By Carla Drysdale

As the country struggles to its feet after the crash of the new economy,
exacerbated by the Sept. 11th attacks on the WTC, angel investors have
been doing their part to help by continuing to provide seed money to startups.

Angels, entrepreneurs-turned-investors, first earned this moniker during
depression-era New York by bailing out ailing Broadway theatre companies.
Since then, angel investments, along with those of venture capitalists, have
expanded from Broadway to the Internet and beyond. Now, because traditional
VCs are slowing the pace of investments, angels have new opportunities to
swoop down to fill in the seed-stage gap.

Click here to read more.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/article.asp?docid=4461&nd=1126

======================== Sponsored by =========================

Receive a 4 week RISK-FREE trial subscription to the Financial Times

Financial Times reporters all over the world cover everything from business
and economic news to world events like no other publication.  Click on the
link below to start your 4 week risk-free trial subscription and receive
the insightful reports on companies and markets worldwide with the FT's
unique, global perspective.

SUBSCRIBE TODAY: https://www.ftsubs.com/JBE14J303
==============================================================

Broker and third-party reports
-----------------------------------------

1. TODAY'S SPECIAL REPORT
Robertson Stephens provides a comprehensive look at future energy investment
themes.

The firm identifies 3 sub-sectors they see in the energy technology industry.
They discuss industry fundamentals, solution demands, fuel cell technologies,
regulatory issues, and the universe of energy technology companies.
(231-page report for purchase - $300)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25583277&nd=1126

2. EDITOR'S PICK: CURRENT RESEARCH FROM THE CUTTING EDGE
Robertson Stephens looks at Q4 ad spending trends for radio and television
companies.

The firm looks at year over year spending comparisons, considers the effects of
the Sept. 11 tragedy, automobile promotions, and upcoming spending catalysts.
In the report, RS identifies 4 companies it considers "buys." (6-page report for
purchase - $25)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25527693&nd=1126

3. WHAT'S HOT?
Needham & Co. reports on the communications chip inventory situation.

Needham comments on chip inventories among both original equipment
manufacturers (oem) and contract manufacturers (cm). They provide a chart-
based '99-'01 analysis of inventories for oems, cms, Cisco (CSCO), and Nortel
(NT). (2-page report for purchase - $10)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25514267&nd=1126

4. INVESTORS' CHOICE: 3-DAY FAVORITE
Standard & Poors profiles the NYSE's most capitalized company,
General Electric (GE).

S&P provides an overview, business summary, and industry outlook for GE.
Also included in the report, a peer group comparison, recent news headlines,
Wall Street analysts' consensus opinions, and S&P's fair value for
the stock. (5-page report for purchase - $5)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=407622&nd=1126

5. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW
Wall Street Strategies makes the case for continued strength in stocks.

Principal analyst Charles Payne cites several reasons he sees investors driving
the market higher. Also, he takes a technical look at major market indexes and
rates stocks in the consumer sector, including Phillip Morris (MO). (19-page
report for purchase - $150)
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25526308&nd=1126

======================== Sponsored by =========================

The Telecomm Analyst: Wall Street's daily and weekly industry outlook

Multex's The Telecomm Analyst features daily telecommunications-industry
specific research highlights, investment ideas, analyst opinions, portfolio
strategies: http://www.multexinvestor.com/Analysts/HomeTTA.asp

To be sure you receive your TTA newsletter every week, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/login.asp
==============================================================

Online advice and chats
-----------------------------------------

1. ASK THE ANALYST
Schaeffer's Research's Bernie Schaeffer discusses important technical market
levels.

Schaeffer takes a look at recent market activity, keying on trendlines, possible
points of resistance, as well as development of overly bullish sentiment. What
critical technicals should you be looking at? Ask Bernie questions until Mon.
Nov. 26.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheAnalystForm.asp?&nd=1126

Prepare for the investing week ahead with Bernie's insight to the hottest
sectors and stocks. Sign up below for Bernie's FREE e-weekly market report,
Monday Morning Outlook. Click here
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/redirect.asp?CODE=GB01A8&PAGE=1

2. ASK THE EXPERT
American Century Investment's Karen Burnett talks about choosing a retirement
plan for your business.

Choosing a retirement plan for your business or yourself is one of the most
important financial decisions you will make. Karen Burnett of American Century
Investments will take your questions until Thurs., November 29.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/AskTheExpertForm.asp?&nd=1126

Free and sponsored reports
-----------------------------------------

1. FREE RESEARCH REPORT
Prudential looks at recent developments in computer and application software.

The analysts discuss the launch of Microsoft's (MSFT) Windows XP and XBox,
Computer Associates (CA), Wind River Systems (WIND), Symantec (SYMC), Vignette
(VIGN), and more. This 11-page report, which usually sells for $25, is free
to members for the next 72 hours.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=25514305&nd=1126

2. DAILY FREE SPONSOR REPORT
Morgan Stanley sets a $28 price target on diversified technology company
Agilent Technologies (A).

The firm argues that Agilent is "doing a good job of restructuring its business,"
and its life sciences and semiconductor product groups are showing significant
improvement. Register for the firm's free-research trial to access research
on this and other stocks to see its key investment positives and investment risks.
http://www.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=4521759&sid=8&nd=1126

===================================================================
Please send your questions and comments to:
mailto:investor.help@multex.com

If you'd like to learn more about Multex Investor, please visit:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/welcome.asp

If you can't remember your password and/or your user name, click here:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/lostinfo.asp

If you want to update your email address, please click on the url below:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp
===================================================================

To remove yourself from the mailing list for the Daily Update, please
REPLY to THIS email message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. To remove yourself from all Multex Investor mailings, including
the Daily Update and The Internet Analyst, please respond with the
words NO EMAIL in the subject line.

You may also unsubscribe on the account update page at:
http://www.multexinvestor.com/edituinfo.asp

===================================================================
Please email advertising inquiries to us at:
mailto:advertise@multex.com.

Be sure to check out our other newsletters, The Internet Analyst
and The Telecomm Analyst by Multex.com. The newsletters will
inform, educate, and entertain you with usable investment data,
ideas, experts, and info about the Internet and telecommunications
sectors. To see this week's issue,
click here:
http://www.thetelecommanalyst.com/ or
http://www.theinternetanalyst.com/


fyi

-----Original Message-----
From: MMackles@nyiso.com [mailto:MMackles@nyiso.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Ngo, Tracy
Cc: PGootee@nyiso.com
Subject: Collateral

Tracy, as discussed yesterday, for Enron Energy Services and Enron Power
Marketing meet the NYISO creditworthiness criteria, a corporate guarantee
from a corporation with a BBB unsecured long-term credit rating is required
As of last week, Enron Corp. was downgraded to BBB-.  Therefore, to meet
the criteria, Enron Corp. needs to replace their guaranties issued in favor
of the NYISO within five business days.  These guarantees may be replaced
with cash, letters of credit or surety bonds.  Listed below are the
guarantees issued by Enron Corp. on behalf of Enron Energy Services and
Enron Power Marketing:

Enron Energy Services: $ 1,500,000      ($1,000,000 Energy, $500,000 ICAP)

Enron Power Marketing: $ 5,000,000       Energy
                                                   5,000,000       ICAP
                                                 20,000,000       TCCs

If you have any questions regarding the example of the Letter of Credit or
the Surety Bond sent to you yesterday, please contact me at once.  My
number is 518/356-6210.


Kate,

You wrote:
"Question #2 - The third choice says "Neither party can more than the
other." I'm not sure if I understand this, or if there's a word missing.
Question on the supply and demand on textbooks, parts B and C. One questions
states "What price does not seller receive?" Again, I'm not sure whether you
mean the price that the seller does NOT receive or if "not" is an mistakenly
placed word."

I am sorry about the typos.  I will give you credit for those problems.

Scott


Here are the questions from Allegheny regarding Gleason.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
07:22 PM ---------------------------

"Irwin, Thomas J." <TIRWIN@alleghenyenergy.com> on 10/19/2000 06:59:46 PM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc: "'mitch.robinson@enron.com'" <mitch.robinson@enron.com>, "Stang, H. Roy"
<hstang@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P."
<JLAPCEV@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Pezze, Thomas A."
<TPEZZE@alleghenyenergy.com>, "'paul.f.burton@ssmb.com'"
<paul.f.burton@ssmb.com>
Subject: ENRON -- Information requests resulting from Gleason site visit

The following requests resulted from our site visit to Gleason Plant on
October 19, 2000:
1. Regarding the three CTs purchased and installed at Gleason, when was
the reservation agreement signed?
2. Please provide CD with Construction Drawings and Plot Plan
identified on DealBench.  Please include Seimens drawings.
3. Please point out in DealBench or provide separate the documents that
contain operating budget for Gleason.  Discussions identified a year 2000
budget versus actual report and a 2001 draft budget.  These two would be
adequate.
4. Please provide engineering details of RTU module and associated
equipment used for plant dispatch.
5. Please provide the O&M contract with Operational Energy Corporation.
6. Please provide water chemistry analysis for wells or identify
document on DealBench.
7. Please provide lease on property with Industrial Development Board.
8. Please provide any available information on Westinghouse contract.
9. Please provide chart and guarantee curves for CTs.
10. Please provide your calculations supporting the 915 hour annual
operating limit.
11. Please identify equivalent starts for each CT.
12. Please provide copy of standard operating procedure for the plant.
13. Please provide hydrological studies on aquifer used for plant water.
Please provide forecast of Price volatility for ECAR, TVA, and M


Please see the attached article in the recent issue of Regulation, Volume 23,
Number 3, 2000:


Chihuaha That (122 pts) defeated Gore's Gangstas (60 pts)
GassHoles (56 pts) defeated BlitzKrieg (40 pts)
SOMFAW (94 pts) defeated Jester's Molesters (40 pts)
Chihuaha This (101 pts) defeated Joe Stepenovitch (50 pts)
Chum Runners (79 pts) defeated Quieres su papa? (28 pts)
Di's Nasties (77 pts) defeated El Mariachi (62 pts)
F-Bombs (82 pts) defeated Dawg Mawlers (67 pts)

The weekly report is available:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/weekly?L=0205&W=10

Natural Gas Gridiron Address:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/home/0205

Questions about this site?  Check out our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
at http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/support_faq.html
or our detailed on-line help at
http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/coach.html


Carol St. Clair will be the swap lawyer for this transaction.

Scott Sefton
02/24/2000 11:32 AM
To: Mark Evans/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Schardin/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nora
Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Margaux/Whitewing

Mark,

I finally got to speak with Mike yesterday. The short answer is that Nora
Dobin in Global Finance legal will be your contact person on everything other
than the swap. Mark Taylor (or his designee) will handle the swap.

We will rely heavily on Ron Astin and Trena Chandler of V&E to assist us on
the Whitewing issues. In case you didn't know, Ron and Trena represented us
in the creation of Whitewing (and its holding company Condor) and have been
involved in all the subsequent Condor/Whitewing transactions. Because Jeff
Eldredge has a significant role in Margaux, I hope having V&E involved here
and in London will facilitate coordination on these issues.

Cheers
Scott

Mark Evans
02/24/2000 08:55 AM
To: Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Schardin/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Margaux/Whitewing

Scott,

in Cynthia's absence, can you allocate someone else from your group to
oversee this? As you can see, we are in need of some immediate assistance on
Whitewing.

Did you get the chance to speak to Mike Jakubik about Margaux? Can you help
out with Houston coordination or shall I just get on with it with Mark Taylor
and Jeff Hodge?

Thanks.

         Mark

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Evans/LON/ECT on 24/02/2000 14:47
---------------------------

Stuart Schardin
24/02/2000 11:52
To: rastin@velaw.com, tchandler@velaw.com, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT
cc: Donette Dewar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Evans/LON/ECT@ECT, Maroun J Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Margaux/Whitewing

Ron/Trina/Ben,

I wanted to touch base with you on some Margaux-related issues for Whitewing
and determine what the appropriate course of action is.

As a brief description of the Margaux transaction, in case you have not been
updated recently, the Margaux transaction will now occur through the
synthetic transfer of risk to the Noteholders/Margaux equity.  The method by
which this occurs is as follows.  Whitewing continues to hold the equity
interests in the assets (excluding 56% of Trakya, ETOL, approx. 31.25% of
Sutton Bridge, 50% of Nowa Sarzyna, and approx. 50% of Teesside, all of which
are held by Enron).  Whitewing enters into a fixed for floating swap with
ENA, with Whitewing making a fixed annual payment to ENA in an amount
representing the base case cash flows of the underlying assets and ENA making
a floating payment to Whitewing that is initially equal to the fixed payment
from Whitewing but is adjusted downward if certain identified negative things
happen at the various projects (thereby transferring certain of the risks of
the projects through the floating leg).  Concurrently, Margaux (the Issuer)
raises approx. $511 mm of capital and, through a whollly-owned subsidiary,
purchases the floating leg (receiveable) from Whitewing for $511 MM.  In
other words, Whitewing enters into the swap and immediately monetizes its
receiveable to Margaux.  The net result is that Whitewing receives cash
proceeds up front, and has a fixed payment obligation to ENA, and ENA has a
floating payment obligation to Margaux.  I've attached a structure diagram
below.

With this in mind, the following issues related to Whitewing have arisen.
The tax group would like to characterize the payment ENA receives from
Whitewing as a preferred partnership distribution (see attached note from
Donette Dewar below).  My question is how do we achieve this result.  First,
is Whitewing LP able to enter into this transaction itself, or does it need
to occur at a subsidiary level?  In other words, does the swap fall under the
definition of "Indebtedness" (clause (viii) perhaps?) in the Whitewing LP
Agreement, which is prohibited at the Whitewing level?  If it cannot, is SE
Acquisition the best candidate to be ENA's counterparty, or do we run into
issues with the Natwest facility (although they'd likely consent since they
will get repaid out of the proceeds of the transaction)?  Once the issue of
who is the appropriate counterparty has been determined, we need to discuss
the mechanics by which we effect the transaction.  If we are indeed going to
open up the Whitewing LP Agreement, I suspect that AnnMarie will need to
revisit the Allocation and Distribution sections, which is probably no easy
task.  If not, and the transaction will occur at a subsidiary level, we need
to determine where.  Also, I'm sure this transaction will require
Certificateholder approval as it is in excess of the $40mm threshold.  A
final logistical issue that Donette raises in her note is who will be
responsible for the legal work required at the Whitewing level.

More generally, are there any other legal or other issues that you see with
respect to this transaction from a Whitewing perspective?

If you'd like to discuss the transaction further, please let me know.  I'll
be in Houston the early part of next week, so perhaps we can spend some time
discussing these issues then.  Thanks, and I look forward to seeing you next
week.

Best regards,

Stuart

---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Schardin/LON/ECT on 24/02/2000
11:09 ---------------------------

Anne Edgley
24/02/2000 09:48
To: Stuart Schardin/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Margaux - Whitewing Partnership amendment

---------------------- Forwarded by Anne Edgley/LON/ECT on 24/02/2000 09:49
---------------------------
From: Cynthia Harkness on 23/02/2000 12:28 CST
To: Mark Evans/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Donette Dewar/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Maroun J
Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Dwyer/LON/ECT@ECT, AnnMarie
Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben F
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Margaux - Whitewing Partnership amendment

Dear All,

I will be leaving Enron Global Finance this Friday to join Enron Broadband
Services, Inc.  You should refer any inquiries in this regard to Scott
Sefton.  It was a pleasure working with you and I wish you great success in
finalyzing Margaux!  Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can help you
with anything in the future!  All the best!

Cynthia

Mark Evans
02/23/2000 11:37 AM
To: Donette Dewar/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Maroun J Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Dwyer/LON/ECT@ECT, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Harkness/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: Re: Margaux - Whitewing Partnership amendment

Donette,

these questions need to be directed to the Whitewing legal team. I believe
this is Cynthia Harkness. I will then work with Cynthia to ensure her efforts
are coordinated with ours.

      Mark

Donette Dewar
23/02/2000 17:19
To: Mark Evans/LON/ECT@ECT, Anne Edgley/LON/ECT@ECT, Maroun J
Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen Dwyer/LON/ECT@ECT, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Margaux - Whitewing Partnership amendment

As you may recall, the tax comments to the debt term sheet reflected a need
for an amendment to the Whitewing partnership agreement to admit ENA as a
partner. You also may recall that we briefly discussed the potential for
legal/accounting/other issues that may arise as a result of any such
amendment.  So that the Whitewing process can be moved forward, would you
please consider the following:

1. Have any legal/accounting/other issues been identified as resulting from
an amendment to the Whitewing partnership agreement?

2. If so, what are the potential solutions to any such issues?

3. Have definite conclusions been reached regarding the economics of ENA's
preferred return on the Whitewing interest, such that a draft of the
necessary partnership allocations can be undertaken?

4. Has a decision been made regarding who will be charged with drafting the
amendments?  Will it be the Margaux legal team?  The Houston Global Finance
legal group?  Other??

Thanks, in advance, for your consideration of these issues.

Kindest Regards,

DMD


Donald and Lisa will not be skiing this weekend, please call them if you have
questions on schedules.

Donald is all NW points and COB,

Lisa is all SW points and PV.

Thanks,

c


Did you know there is an even easier way than using the phone to order
and keep track of your prescriptions?  Ordering your prescriptions
online lets you take advantage of many benefits you don't get when you
fill prescriptions over the phone or through the mail.

That's right! As a plan member, you can experience all of the benefits
that merckmedco.com, our online pharmacy, has to offer:
* Safe and simple order process that lets you order all of your eligible
  prescriptions at the same time.
* Easy access to up to 18 months of prescription history so you will
  always know what medicines you've been taking and, if you choose to,
  you can share this information with your health care professional.
* Brand-name and generic medication price comparisons that can save you
  money.
* A world of health and wellness information, resources, and tools
  personalized to complement your medical history and help you become
  more knowledgeable about your health.

Just follow this link:
https://host1.merck-medco.com/cgi-bin/Rb_home.cgi?-Q-OTC2000SDS and
select "Register Now" from our home page to complete our one-time
registration and start managing your pharmacy benefit the fast and easy
way - online at merckmedco.com. (And be sure to have a recent prescription
number handy when you register so that you can immediately begin enjoying
all the benefits of merckmedco.com -- including easy online prescription
refills and order status.)

Visit merckmedco.com today and experience all the benefits that only our
online pharmacy can provide.

For AOL Users:
Merck-Medco Homepage

                  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
This e-mail contains confidential information from Merck-Medco and is
intended solely for the use of the individual named on this transmission.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing,
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, to prevent future transmissions like this,
please notify Merck-Medco by forwarding this e-mail to the following
address: website@merckmedco.com.


He's going to be at the birthday party or at Matt's.  Maybe we should drop
him off.

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 02/08/2001 03:25:58 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Michael

Sweetie, how do you want to set it up?  NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Brashear, Charlotte [mailto:cbrashear@velaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:57 PM
To: 'nmann@erac.com'
Subject: RE: Michael

   Fine.  Should I pick him up at school or what?

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Mann [mailto:nmann@erac.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Choc Brashear (E-mail)
Subject: Michael

Choc,
Could you keep Michael for a short time tomorrow, say 7 -10? Kay was invited
to the Enron booth at the Bar B Q and thinks she would like to go. Thanks,
NM
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Ron we will need to be on the first flight out Monday morning in order to attend the PNM meeting Rick wants us to attend.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Matthews, Ron
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Alters, Dennis; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Albuquerque Cross Functional Meeting

I made room reservations for the 3 of us on November 5 only at the Sheraton Uptown (505-881-0000).  The rooms are not guaranteed past 6:00 pm.  Our confirmation numbers are as follows.

		Ron M.		118587
		Darrell S.	118588
		Dennis A.	118590

I checked on flights and the best bet is a 2:30 pm flight arriving Albuquerque at 3:36 pm (next one wouldn't get in until 7:37 pm).  Flights back to Houston are 2:40 pm and 4:30 pm arriving at 5:37 & 7:37 pm respectively.  I vote for the 4:30 pm flight to make sure we don't run short on time.

LET ME KNOW ASAP MONDAY TO BOOK.  Right now the fare is  $156.25 & non-refundable.  Not sure what it will be Monday.

Kim,

I don't know your plans in and out of Albuquerque so I didn't book a room for you.  I thought you were headed elsewhere from Albuqueruque.  Let me know if you want me to do something on arrangements.

Ron M.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 09:17 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	05/09/2001 06:31 PM

		 To: cttng@pdq.net, Alicia Goodrow/Enron@EnronXGate, henryg@shellus.com,
ah692217@bcm.tmc.edu, rayberyl.mack@worldnet.att.net
		 cc:
		 Subject: May 19 Church Gourmet Cajun Dinner

I look forward to having you all as guests for an evening of Cajun cooking at
my home on Saturday, May 19 at 7:00 pm.  Some of us (I won't name names!) are
hoping we might even have enough time to play a wicked game of African Uno!

Below is the list of the individuals attending the dinner at my home, and
attached below are the recipes for the evening.  I will provide beer, wine
and soft drinks.  In addition, I will make a big pot of white rice to go with
the Red Beans & Rice, & Shrimp Etouffe.

Please let me know as soon as possible which recipe you would prefer to
prepare.

Laura Johnson (1)
Charles and Janice Thompson (2)
John Hagood (1)
Ann Hutson (1)
Henry and Alicia Goodrow (2)
Beryl and Ray Mack (2)
Tana Jones (1)

The directions to my house are as follows:

1.  Take 59 to the Greenbriar exit (like you are going to Church)
2.  Make a right on Greenbriar
3.  Quickly get into the left lane because you will have to make the first
left possible onto a street called Milford
4.  Then, make a left onto Shepherd (you need to go back one street in the
opposite direction)
5.  The first right will be Banks Street (it is the street right next to the
59 freeway)
6.  On Banks, go past the first stop sign, I will be the 3 or 4th house on
the left, a taupe colored, ivy covered cottage, 1920 Banks
7.  My phone number is (713) 529-1038


The Post Petition Lead Meeting will occur every Tuesday and Thursday through the end of December (excluding 12/25).  Please note, going forward, all meetings will take place in EB49c1.  The agenda for Tuesday, December 18 will be proposed retention plan.

Please call me only if you are unable to attend.

Many thanks,
Lucy

==================================
Lucy Marshall
Executive Assistant to Jim Fallon
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services
Office 713-853-4525
Fax    713-345-7864
Cell    713-417-7802
lucy.marshall@enron.com


BOO!  Anyone there?  Chrisy is back at work now.


- 11_26_01LO.xls
 - 11_26_01GO.xls
 - 11_26_01OH.xls


Hey Girl,

Sorry about last night, remember I told you I was looking for my NyQuil, well I found it and took a couple of swigs and went straight to sleep.  I really meant to call you back, but could not wake up.  I finally woke up around 11:30 and got up and got a drink of water.

By the way, the latest, unconfirmed rumor, is that Samatha and Anessa Hall Joseph are supposed to be pregnant!

See you!


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com@ENRON <mailto:Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Bruce+2ELundstrom+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Bruce+2ELundstrom+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:47 PM
To:	Harris, Stephanie J; Rob.Walls.enronXgate@enron.com <mailto:Rob.Walls.enronXgate@enron.com>; Haedicke, Mark
Cc:	Rex.Rogers.EnronXGate@enron.com <mailto:Rex.Rogers.EnronXGate@enron.com>
Subject:	Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

   The lender meetings in Singapore this week have been challenging.  The
   Indian banks are trying to induce the foreign banks to fund into a
   project with a repudiated PPA.  It is becoming more apparent to us that
   the Indian banks are being heavily influenced by the Government of India
   and not acting as commercial institutions.  Our business people do not
   believe that all or most foreign banks will continue funding at this
   point.  It is likely that the Indian banks could act on their own to
   cure the construction contract payments which give rise to termination
   this month (about $34 million).  Within a few months, however, the
   Indian bank facility would be fully funded.

   Today, we filed our writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging
   MERC's jurisdiction.  While we have a hearing date scheduled on Monday,
   there is some doubt whether or not we will get a hearing on that date.

Bruce


Kevin Kindall brought to my attention that a number of new members in the
group may need to get access to the Research Projects Tracking database in
lotus notes.    Access can be requested through use of the secutity resource
request form accessed from lotus notes.    Just submit the form requesting
that you be added as a user of the research group's Research Projects
Tracking database.

thanks,
--Stinson


There apparently was a proposal made at the last VP PRC Committee meeting to retitle the Commercial Support peer group to "Professional Services" (see note below).  Let me know if you are opposed to this, otherwise I will indicate ETS' support for this change later this week.
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Oxley, David
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Colwell, Wes
Cc:	Kean, Steven; Olson, Cindy; Lynch, Drew; Pieper, Kalen; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Barnard, Marla; Joyce, Mary; Smith, Gary; Corteselli, Gina
Subject:	Proposal to Change "Commercial Support" peer group label to "Professional Services"

At the VP PRC meeting last Wednesday, Dave Delainey proposed we consider retitling the Commercial Support peer group as above. Apparently this suggestion was made and broadly supported at a policy committee meeting a few weeks ago. The suggestion is that the Support label is seen rather negatively across the organisation and the new label may be an improvement.

The VP PRC Committee resolved that they would be open to supporting a change, subject to the senior leads from across CS providing their views/support.

I volunteered to circulate this note to the 2 of you in EWS and ask my colleagues from HR to share with their CS leads to solicit their views before returning to the committee late next week with summarised reaction. Perhaps you would provide me with your views and a vote for or against?

I would strongly recommend that we do broadly discuss this outside a small circle of people.

David


Absolutely - we can outline what it would take.  Greg Simmons definitely
said that it would be a congressional decision in D.C. - I asked him "what
about the 'energy initiative' and 'expedited review'" - he said that it
probably would not matter in this case - National Monuments are off limits
to new ROWs without an act of congress.

Scott J. Patti
Senior Project Manager
ENSR International
1601 Prospect Parkway
Fort Collins, CO  80525
Phone: (970) 493-8878
Fax:     (970) 493-0213
Email:  spatti@ensr.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry.Campbell@enron.com [mailto:Larry.Campbell@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Patti, Scott
Cc: John.Shafer@enron.com; Doug..Cebryk@enron.com
Subject: RE: Additional Note

that was my read also.  I wanted to get some more specifice details on what
it was gonna take and then pass it along to construction and you guys.  Can
you follow up on this with a short outline of the process and steps for
approval?

"Patti, Scott" <SPatti@ensr.com> on 09/26/2001 08:31:04 AM

To:   "'Larry.Campbell@enron.com'" <Larry.Campbell@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Additional Note

Larry, I got the sense that it is not impossible, but that it would be a
long, drawn out process, and would shoot the schedule all to hell.

Scott J. Patti
Senior Project Manager
ENSR International
1601 Prospect Parkway
Fort Collins, CO  80525
Phone: (970) 493-8878
Fax:     (970) 493-0213
Email:  spatti@ensr.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry.Campbell@enron.com [mailto:Larry.Campbell@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Patti, Scott
Cc: 'Shafer, John'; 'Cebryk, Doug'; Schmidt, Jon; 'Taylor, Gina';
'Hyatt, Kevin'; 'Gadd, Eric'; Alstad, Jon; Munson, Kim
Subject: Re: Additional Note

Thanks Scott, I heard about the same thing, and was checking futrher to see
if this was actually the case....

"Patti, Scott" <SPatti@ensr.com> on 09/25/2001 08:35:35 PM

To:   "'Shafer, John'" <John.Shafer@ENRON.com>, "'Cebryk, Doug'"
      <Doug.Cebryk@ENRON.com>, "'Larry.Campbell@ENRON.com'"
      <Larry.Campbell@ENRON.com>
cc:   "Schmidt, Jon" <jschmidt@ensr.com>, "'Taylor, Gina'"
      <Gina.Taylor@ENRON.com>, "'Hyatt, Kevin'" <Kevin.Hyatt@ENRON.com>,
      "'Gadd, Eric'" <Eric.Gadd@ENRON.com>, "Alstad, Jon"
      <JAlstad@ensr.com>, "Munson, Kim" <KMunson@ensr.com>

Subject:  Additional Note

By the way, I got a call back from Greg Simmons in the BLM State Office in
Arizona - my question to him was whether or not a proposed ROW across the
Agua Fria National Monument would constitute a "Fatal Flaw."  He indicated
that it likely would be a fatal flaw.  He said that it would take "an act
of
congress" literally, not figuratively, to put a pipeline across a National
Monument.  The boundary of the Monument is the east side of I 17, south of
Cordes Junction - I don't know if we can stay on the west side of the
Interstate there, but we might oughta check it out - it looks like we could
get into some pretty rough side-sloping, two-toning.  FYI.

Scott J. Patti
Senior Project Manager
ENSR International
1601 Prospect Parkway
Fort Collins, CO  80525
Phone: (970) 493-8878
Fax:     (970) 493-0213
Email:  spatti@ensr.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Patti, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:28 PM
To: 'Shafer, John'; Cebryk, Doug; 'Dave.Hubbard@ENRON.com'
Cc: Schmidt, Jon; Taylor, Gina; Hyatt, Kevin; Gadd, Eric; Alstad, Jon
Subject: ENSR Cashflow Estimate Through Construction of Project Sundevil

Lady and Gentlemen,

As the Subject line would lead you to believe, I am attaching a further
refinement of our cost estimate, spread out over the life of the project.
I
know that you, Dave, requested a breakdown by personnel and hours, but I am
going to have to go home and pack for my trip.  We certainly can break this
down by personnel and hours, but I cannot do it tonight.  I apologize for
any inconvenience this may cause any of you.  Please remember that you can
contact Jon Alstad in my absence (cc'ed).  I will be back in the office on
October 1st.  Scott

Scott J. Patti
Senior Project Manager
ENSR International
1601 Prospect Parkway
Fort Collins, CO  80525
Phone: (970) 493-8878
Fax:     (970) 493-0213
Email:  spatti@ensr.com

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed.  Any unauthorized use, distribution,
copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender immediately.

It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for
business purposes only.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

ENSR
www.ensr.com
postmaster@ensr.com
**********************************************************************

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


?
There will be a conference call today at 10:00 a.m.  Pacific Standard Time to
discuss the meetings in Washington, DC last  week.?
The  dial-in number for this conference call is:
?
1-877-322-9654
Part  Code: 111756
?
?
?
?
Carol Hudson
IEP


You are bad to the bones...!

	Bob Bowen
	04/25/2001 11:42 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline
Transactions W/ ATTACHMENT

The trades are all similar so here goes:

Fixed Price Payer (Buyer)  Coral Energy Holding, L.P. ((EnronOnline Deal
#1150351)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150406)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150411)
     Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.  (EnronOnline Deal #1150426)

Floating Price Payer(Seller)  Enron North America Corp.
Deal Date    4/20/01
Effective Date    10/1/01
Termination Date   10/31/01
Notional Quantity   5,000 MMBtu per day
Fixed Price    Last Day of NYMEX plus $0.3700
Floating Price    The applicable Determination Period Bidweek Average Price
in the
     row entitled "Malin" located in the "California" section of the table
entitled
     "Spot Gas Prices" in the first issue of Natural Gas Intelligence Weekly
     Gas Price Index for the applicable Determination Period
     or, simply stated
     NGI - Malin
Commodity    Natural Gas

If I forgot something, please let me know.

How is Karen Lambert by the way?  Has she been on vacation lately?

From: Tana Jones on 04/25/2001 10:05 AM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions W/
ATTACHMENT

Attached is a list of four deals for some online "oops" trades.  Can you send
me the deal particulars so I can prepare terminations of the trades.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 10:04 AM -----

	Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 09:50 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions
W/ ATTACHMENT

Tana -
This e-mail includes the attachment.  It "fell off" my e-mail from last night.

Thanks -
Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cass, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, April  24, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Moorer, Torrey; Denny, Jennifer; Thomas, Sheri
Subject: Request Termination Agreements for 4 EnronOnline Transactions

Hi Tana -

We need your assistance in preparing termination letters for the transactions
listed on the attached spreadsheet and described as follows:

On Friday, April 20, 2001, four transactions occurred on EnronOnline that
were in error.  One transaction was with Coral Energy Holding L.P. and three
transactions were with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.  As mutually agreed
to by both the Enron commercial team and the respective counterparties, it
was decided that each of the four transactions would not be confirmed and
should be terminated.

The exact specifics are detailed as follows:

? The transactions occurred due to an inadvertent entry in the actual
production system of EnronOnline by a Product Control Group member, Melba
Lozano.  Melba activated a product assuming that she was in the EnronOnline
test system of EnronOnline.

? The product transacted upon is normally managed by Frank Ermis.  However,
in his absence on Friday, the product was managed by Matt Lenhart.

? Steve South, trader on the West Desk, called and notified both Morgan and
Coral that the product had been posted in error.  All parties agreed that the
transactions were not reflective of the normal pricing.  As a result they
further agreed that transaction confirmations would not be necessary and that
the deals would be "killed" on all sides.  (For reference of any telephone
tapes that may need to be pulled, the conversations with the counterparties
occurred around 2:00 pm.)

? No confirmations were generated as a result of the killing of the
transactions in TAGG.

? I spoke with Mike Grigsby on Monday (April 23, 2001) and advised him that
termination letters may be required by Legal.  He responded that he had no
problem with that.

Tana, please advise if additional information is required to complete the
termination letters or if another course of action is warranted.

Thank you,

Rob Cass
x35491


Stephanie will not be in the office today.  She will return to work tomorrow.

Holly

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Steve, what is the status?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:05 PM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas on 11/13/2000 08:30 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 2001 Plan

I spoke with Bob Hermann this afternoon and, in short, the single biggest
contributor to the increase in the corporate tax allocation relates to the
expansion of state and local tax support being provided to our new "business
verticals" - that is, Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets and
Enron Net Works - which expense should be specifically allocated to such
groups rather than ENA, as is currently the case.  I will follow up with you
regarding the revised number after I have resolved the allocation issue.
Best regards.  Steve.

David W Delainey
11/10/2000 12:53 PM
To: Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2001 Plan

Guys, I noticed that the corporate tax allocation to ENA has more than
doubled from 2000 forecast to 2001 plan ie) $1,600,000 from $700,000.  Could
you please explain.  Our goal which is being met in ENA's direct expense
groups is to remain flat year or year from 2000 to 2001.

Regards
Delainey


Sarah Davidson
2229 40th Pl., NW, 4
Washington, DC 20007
sgd8@cornell.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Sarah Davidson


FYI.  We've been given permission to distribute, but no "on behalf of" the
Air Force.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 05:20 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/21/2001 02:11 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Bill Gang <wgang@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access]

As requested.

Received: (qmail 28911 invoked by uid 41); 16 Mar 2001 21:15:38 -0000
Received: from tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil (131.55.121.4)  by mx6.quiknet.com
with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 21:15:38 -0000
Received: from tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil (root@localhost) by
tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA25406; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:52:48
-0600 (CST)
Received: from ksxlwu01.tyndall.af.mil (ksxlwu01.tyndall.af.mil
[131.55.249.98]) by tynsun06.tyndall.af.mil with ESMTP id OAA25402; Fri, 16
Mar 2001 14:52:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: by ksxlwu01.tyndall.af.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <HB840M6F>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:53:18 -0600
Message-ID: <39D3EAE3D1E7D31190D800508B6FF10001D9D291@fsxlwu04.tyndall.af.mil>
From: Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil>
To: "Govenar Scott (E-mail)" <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Cc: "J. Mara Susan. (E-mail)" <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
Subject: Air Force Talking Paper of Direct Access
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:53:16 -0600
Return-Receipt-To: Wells Bill LtCol HQ AFCESA/ULT  <Bill.Wells@tyndall.af.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0AE5B.1F96B000"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00c00000

As requested

 <<Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc>>

Bill C. Wells, Lt Col, USAF
Chief, Utility Litigation Team
DSN 523-6347; 850-283-6347

Note new e-mail address:
    bill.wells@tyndall.af.mil

 - Direct Acccess TP(16 Mar 01).doc


Hi Becky,

 Vince and I came up with these allocations for all of EGM :

 Gary Hickerson
  Rate & Currency Trading  10.0%
  Agriculture Trading
   & Origination  27.5%

 Jeff Shankman
  Weather   20%
  Insurance   30%
  Oil    7.5%
  Coal    2.5%
  Freight    2.5%

 TOTAL     100%


Lorraine,

	Thanks for forwarding the attached message. The way I read this, PSNM is effectively withdrawing its demand for the collateral as long as we don't use the contract. We should probably send them a letter confirming that this is the case. I would suggest that you just send an e-mail in response stating that what PSNM has proposed is acceptable and that our understanding is that PSNM will not require collateral as long as we don't utilize the contract. Therefore, PSNM's demand for collateral by December 15 is, based on our understanding, withdrawn. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: Transwestern Off-system Transportation Contract T39817

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMurray, Lindsey [mailto:AMcMurr@pnm.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:06 AM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc:	Arreguin, Janette; Dopson, Karen; McFearin, Dan; Merville, Patricia; Thompson, Chuck  (GSC); Vigil, Anita
Subject:	Transwestern Off-system Transportation Contract T39817

I talked to my Supervisor and here is what we can do, PNMGS will not accept or confirm any nominations under Off-System Transportation Contract T39817.  This will put the Contract in an "INACTIVE" status instead of total Termination of the Contract.
Prior to any  future expectation of Off-system Transportation, pursuant to Contract T39817 between PNMGS and TWPC, there will then be an updated and current determination on the Financial Responsibility as set forth under ARTICLE XII. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.   PNMGS will then decide what, if any, steps will need to be taken prior to such Off-system Transportation.

A. Lindsey McMurray
PNM Gas Services
Senior Transportation Contract Rep.
505-241-2686
Cell 505-220-2662
Fax 505-241-2339


> The Elmo Misunderstanding
>
> A new employee is hired at the Tickle Me Elmo factory. The personnel
> manager explains her duties, and tells her to report to work promptly at
> 8:00 AM.  The next day at 8:45AM, there's a knock at the personnel
> manager's door. The assembly line foreman comes in and starts ranting
> about this new employee.  He says she's incredibly slow, and the whole
> line is backing up.  The foreman takes the personnel manager down to the
> factory floor to show him the problem.  Sure enough, Elmos are backed up
> all over the place.  At the end of the line is the new employee. She has a
> roll of the material used for the Elmos and a big bag of marbles.  They
> both watch as she cuts a little piece of fabric, wraps it around two
> marbles, and starts sewing the little package between Elmo's legs.   > The
> personnel manager starts laughing hysterically. After several minutes, he
> pulls himself together, walks over to the woman, and says, "I'm sorry, I
> guess you misunderstood me yesterday. Your job is to give Elmo two test
> tickles."
>


Barbara Gray asked me to forward the attached draft of the Back to Back
agreement for your review and comments.  This is the agreement contemplated
by the letter dated June 1, 2001 relating to the Guadalupe Power Partners
L.P. agreement.


1. Only send your timesheet if you have taken time off/rotation information
has changed. Sorry, we are no longer tracking overtime since you are salary
based. To all A/A Pool members: it is important that you let us know of any
time you have taken off. To those members who are sending time on to your
assistant, please make sure they forward that information on to the A/A
program. With the Roll Out of SAP, you have the ability to go on-line @
http://ehronline.enron.com/ and input your time. I will continue to email for
timesheets regardless if you go on-line. This is to let you know it is time
to input your time or fills out your timesheet.
2. If you have moved recently, please provide the following and indicate the
new changes when sending your timesheet.

NEW ROTATION:
Business Unit and Group:
Effective Date:
Location:
Extension:
Supervisor:
Supervisor's Location:
Supervisor's Extension:
Supervisor's Assistant:
Assistant's Location:
Assistant's Extension:
Co #
RC #

3. Quick reminder that you can pick up your check or past period check @ EB
1198 (if they are not already coming to your location/mail stop).

Thank You for Your Cooperation
RT


Dear Dr. Kaminski

This is Quentin Kerr again from Australia. As I mentioned brefore, my paper
will be ready soon. Please find out the attachment with the draft of my
paper (hasn't submitted yet). There are always some errors in my paper.
Please read it, give me some suggestions. Any comments will be appreciated.

By the way, I would like to ask you, have you received my resume? I sent it
to you about two weeks ago.

PS: attached with the pdf file.

Thanks
Quentin
---------------------------------
Quentin Kerr,                            email: qkerr@maths.uq.edu.au
Room: 67-622                          Tel: (07)33461428
Department of Mathematics,  The University of Queensland

 - Jump1.pdf


EES is fine with the Org. chart below. I understand the $6.4 million is total for both ENA & EES. Comments:

1.) Need a recommended split of the $6.4 million for ENA/EES.
2.) I understand the $6.4 million includes $0 for Outside Services. The OOC of ENA/EES needs to approve as these services are needed.
3.) The $6.4 million does include legacy real estate costs. Jim Fallon is the coordination point on our real estate costs-is this on his radar screen?
4.) We need to reconcile what we do with Steve Montovano. Because both ENA/EES want to utilize him, I might suggest leaving him in the regulatory group so that both groups can effectively utilize him. Louise/Jim- are you both OK with this? If so, Rick/Jim, I would suggest putting him in the NE Gas Box.
5.) Rick, I understand you're talking with Kean/Whalley on handling the Washington office activity in Corp. I agree.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Govt Affairs Org Chart

Janet --

Here is the org chart that captures our discussions.  I think that this org and the # of people is the lowest level that can even try to meet the combined needs of ENA and EES.

Total headcount = 21.  The personnel cost = $6.4 MM (total for ENA and EES).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jim


Mark,

This is just a follow up on the guaranty from Consolidated Edison, Inc. which
I had left with you a week or so ago.  As per the confirm below, the
counterparty will need to issue a guaranty by Friday, Sept 22.  They are in
need of our comments of the format so that they can review and process the
request.  Please get back to me with you comments.  To the extent you need
another copy of the gty format, just let me know.

Rgds,
Ed Sacks
x5-7712
---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron on 09/13/2000
02:05 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy@ECT
09/13/2000 09:47 AM
To: Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Consolidated Edison Confirm

Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Melissa


I would love RIck Counihan.  How about it, Rick?

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 09/07/2000 11:29:56 AM
To: <arm@phaser.com>
cc:
Subject: RUSH ITEM: FERC Looking For Speakers

In connection with the Tuesday FERC hearings in San Diego, I have been
called by a FERC contact who is looking for "ESPs who do not have
generation" who would be interested inspeaking or being on a panel on
Tuesday.? Who might be interested?? PLEASE CALL ME ASAP RE  THIS AS THE
AGENDA IS BEING FILLED TODAY.
?
Dan
818.596-2201


The attached is a work in progress.  I'll send more as the day progresses.


Date April 3, 2001

I have sent papers to prospective buyer.

Please call or E-Mail if any problems.

Thank You...Larry


Paige,

In this case I shall ask Stinson and Zimin to talk to you next week.

I am going to prepare and send you an  outline of a document
 we can produce on defining and testing hedging effectiveness.

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Thanks

I am in Portland.  Sorry I am traveling a bunch.

By the way, thanks for all your attention and questions.  Your group was
great to work with.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

Greg Couch
10/17/2000 10:04 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, bbernard@hypercon.com,
mafullerton@westernhubs.com, lbkudu@gateway.net
cc:
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 10:03 AM
---------------------------

"Clark, Mike" <mclark@ARC-AG.COM> on 10/17/2000 07:24:27 AM
To: "Berg, Cindy" <cberg@ARC-AG.COM>, "Miller, David" <dmiller@ARC-AG.COM>,
"Clark, Graydon" <gclark@arc-ag.com>, "'Greg Couch-Enron'" <gcouch@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

-----Original Message-----
From: May, Dallas
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:11 AM
To: Clark, Mike; Graham, Annette; Kirksey, Andy; 'Wayne M.';
'Tammy-Home'; 'rcamp'; 'Marlena'; 'Dean P.'; 'Dawn'
Subject: FW: WORTH SHARING

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wallace [mailto:wallace@NSTEXAS.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 6:40 AM
To: Dallas May (E-mail); Brian Crawford (E-mail); Jay Yeaman (E-mail);
J. D. Hancock (E-mail); George Cudworth (E-mail); Rob Hayes (E-mail)
Subject: WORTH SHARING

This one is worth sharing...Guess which global superpower these
>statistics are from:
>
>
>709,000 regular (active duty) service personnel
>
>293,000 reserve troops
>
>Eight standing Army divisions
>
>20 Air Force and Navy air wings with 2,000 combat aircraft
>
>232 strategic bombers
>
>13 strategic ballistic missile submarines with 3,114 nuclear warheads on
>232 missiles
>
>500 ICBMs with 1,950 warheads
>
>Four aircraft carriers and all the support bases, shipyards and logistical
>assets needed to sustain such a force
>
>Is this country Russia? . . . No
>
>Red China? . . . No
>
>Great Britain? . . . Wrong Again
>
>USA? . . . Hardly
>
>Give up??
>
>Well, don't feel too bad if you are unable to identify this global
>superpower because this country no longer exists. It has vanished. These
are
>the American military forces that have disappeared since the 1992 election
>of Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
>
>Sleep well, America. It's time to vote!

 - C.DTF


Per our discussions, I would like to move forward with the adjustments below for Casey Evans and Donnie Vinson who have assumed the lead positions for Power East Risk Management.

Per our discussions, I would like to move forward with the adjustments below for Fran Chang and Jon Paul Lewis.  These adjustments put the power risk management specialist salaries in line with each other with certain qualifications for certifications and experience with the group.

Please let me know what else I can do to move this along.  Thank you for all your help.

Stacey


John said yes - call me if you have questions.

k

Jeffrey C Gossett@ECT
01/10/2001 11:22 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MLK

John -

Will you need any of my group to come in on Martin Luther King day?


I am resending this because the first message did not go through.
Mary Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron on 02/14/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/14/2000 12:02 PM

To: Stan Horton, Phil Lowry, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rockey Storie, Bill Cordes

Subject: Haiduk line

To followup on your comment Stan, to sell the line,  this is already sold
with certificate authority to KN, however, they have requested an extension
until 7/31 to allow Oneok to review and decide.  this is part of the
Skelleytown system, and it is the area that we want sold--   I don't believe
that we have granted them the extended date  yet and maybe we can use this in
conjuction with the Hobbs line where we didn't get the required info on
pressure for maop purposes.  Just some thoughts--  MK


Anything posted on DealBench?


jmf
---------------------- Forwarded by John M Forney/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 05:58
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Neeley, Myrna" <MNeeley@caiso.com>
10/23/2000 03:57 PM

To: Market Status <MarketStatus@caiso.com>, PX Realtime <pxrt@calpx.com>
cc: "Pryor, Cheri" <CPryor@caiso.com>, "'Rocky Mountain, Desert Southwest
Security Coordinator'" <rmrsecur@warmr.net>, "'Pacific Northwest Security
Coordinator'" <wsccnwsc@bpa.gov>
Subject: Total Transfer Capabilities

Attached are the Total Transfer Capabilities (TTC's) for October 25, 2000.

 <<TTC 10-25-00.PDF>>

The attached Outage information is reliable at time of posting.  The
attached Outage information is subject to change without notice.

Myrna Neeley
Administrative Assistant
Outage Coordination & Transmission Maintenance
California Independent System Operator
Voice: 916-351-2171
 Fax: 916-351-2367
E-mail  mneeley@caiso.com

 - TTC 10-25-00.PDF


Shipper Meeting
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 08:04
AM ---------------------------

"Robin Almond" <robin_almond@iroquois.com> on 08/31/2000 04:05:04 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Iroquois' Annual Customer Mtg

Watch your "snail mail" for your invitation to

Iroquois' 7th Annual Customer Meeting
October 4-6, 2000
Mystic, Connecticut

We anticipate over 125 reps from LDCs, Marketers and Interconnects will
join us for facility and market updates, expansion info, new services,
Order 637 issues, a lobsterbake and an 18-hole golf scramble.

You will be able to Register for the meeting on our website beginning
Tuesday, September 5.  You can also make your hotel reservations on the
web at http://www.hilton.com/hotels/MYSMHHF/index.html.  Click on "Make
a Reservation" and use the group code "IGT".  Make your hotel
reservations by September 21 to get the special Iroquois rate of
$135.00.

Schedule:

Wednesday, October 4
1 pm ? 6 pm --- NrG Highway Training, Conference Suites

Thursday, October 5
7 am --- Golfers Depart for Foxwoods CC, 8 am tee time
8 am ? 12 noon --- NrG Highway Training, Conference Suites
12 pm ? 5:30 pm --- Meeting Registration, Main Lobby
1 pm ? 4 pm --- NrG Highway Training, Conference Suites
2 pm ? 4 pm --- Interconnects, Contingency Drill, Conrad/Dutton
5:45 pm --- Buses depart for Art Association
6 pm ? 9 pm --- Welcome Reception, Mystic Art Association
9 pm --- Buses depart for Mohegan Sun Casino, Hotel
11 pm and 12 am --- Buses return to Hotel

Friday, October 6
8 am --- Breakfast, Ballroom
9 am --- Meeting, Ballroom
12 noon --- Lobsterbake, Mystic Yachting Center

We look forward to seeing you there.  In the meantime, please contact
Lori or me if you have any questions about the hotel, travel to the
meeting, or the meeting itself.

--
Robin Almond
Market Services Coordinator
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
203-925-7274
robin_almond@iroquois.com

Lori Rauser
Marketing & Transportation Administrative Support
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
203-944-7022
lori_rauser@iroquois.com


Mr. Kenneth Lay will not be able to attend.

Thank you


COURTYARD

MESQUITE
2300 HWY 67
MESQUITE, TX  75150
tel: 972-681-3300
fax: 972-681-3324

Hotel Information: http://courtyard.com/DALCM

ARRIVAL CONFIRMATION:
 Confirmation Number:84029698
Guests in Room: 2
NAME: MR ERIC  BASS
Guest Phone: 7138530977
Number of Rooms:1
Arrive: Oct 6 2001
Depart: Oct 7 2001
Room Type: ROOM - QUALITY
Guarantee Method:
 Credit card guarantee
CANCELLATION PERMITTED-BEFORE 1800 DAY OF ARRIVAL

RATE INFORMATION:
Rate(s) Quoted in: US DOLLAR
Arrival Date: Oct 6 2001
Room Rate: 62.10  per night. Plus tax when applicable
Rate Program: AAA AMERICAN AUTO ASSN

SPECIAL REQUEST:
 NON-SMOKING ROOM, GUARANTEED

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
Any Inquiries Please call 1-800-321-2211 or your local
international toll free number.

Confirmation Sent: Mon Jul 30 18:19:39 2001

Legal Disclaimer:
This confirmation notice has been transmitted to you by electronic
mail for your convenience. Marriott's record of this confirmation
notice is the official record of this reservation. Subsequent
alterations to this electronic message after its transmission
will be disregarded.

Marriott is pleased to announce that High Speed Internet Access is
being rolled out in all Marriott hotel brands around the world.
To learn more or to find out whether your hotel has the service
available, please visit Marriott.com.

Earn points toward free vacations, or frequent flyer miles
for every stay you make!  Just provide your Marriott Rewards
membership number at check in.  Not yet a member?  Join for free at
https://member.marriottrewards.com/Enrollments/enroll.asp?source=MCRE


The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.


Here is the spreadsheet we discussed.  Please call with any questions.
PL


Attached are my edits.

From: Rebecca Carter on 05/24/2001 04:42 PM
Sent by: Kelly Johnson
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - February 13, 2001

Please provide comments the attached minutes by June 1, 2001. If you approve
as written, please let us know. Regards, Rebecca

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or
privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by the individual or
organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email or
its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the
sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank you.


The report named: East VaR Estimate <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=East+VaR+Estimate&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/22/2001>, published as of 10/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Amerex is showing a deal on their checkout I did not verbal

Enron buys from Aquila Sept. 01 PV 25 mw peak hrs at $292.50


Hey!!  I can't find my ski stuff; black columbia ski pants and my purple
goggles.  The last time I used them was when we were living together.  I was
just wondering if they may have gotten mixed up with your stuff...

Katie Trullinger
Wilshire Credit Corporation (REO Dpt.)
800-776-0100 x7804
katie.trullinger@wfsg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:59 AM
To:	Benson, Robert
Subject:	RE: you don't need access to stack manager?

I'm glad to hear that you use stack manager but do you have a stand alone computer for stack or do you access it through terminal server (see below)?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Benson, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:56 AM
To:	Diamond, Daniel
Subject:	RE: you don't need access to stack manager?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Daniel
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:41 AM
To:	Benson, Robert; Bishop, Serena; Brodeur, Stephane; Coffing, Timothy; Driscoll, Michael M.; Ermis, Frank; Fischer, Mark; Guzman, Mark; Mallory, Chris; Slinger, Ryan; Thomas, Paul; Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	you don't need access to stack manager?
Importance:	High

I assume that since you didn't respond to my first two emails, none of you require access to stack manager.  If this is incorrect, please respond to my previous emails.

Thanks,

Dan

Subject:	Waiting on your reply -Stack Users

If you're receiving this email its because we're still waiting on a response from you.  Please reply to this message ASAP.  See below for details.

Thanks,

Dan

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop (stand alone computer).

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond
[Benson, Robert]

I use the stack manager. I actually open 2 seperate stack managers.
[Benson, Robert]
22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222


everything is going great.  Sorry I spelled her name incorrectly, I had no
idea...

When things slow down, I'd like to get together with you and the wife so you
all can meet Anne.  Maybe lunch one weekend at the club or something like
that...

-----Original Message-----
From: Stanley.Horton@enron.com [mailto:Stanley.Horton@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:26 PM
To: Larry Davis
Subject: Re:

Caron mentioned it to me but we did not have time to talk about it.  I will
talk with her this weekend and see what she has to say.Hope everything is
going well.


the product number for pg&e topock is 47085.   the correct company name for transcanada is the division of transcanada.  thanks for your help.

matt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lozano, Melba
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	FW: Matt Lenhart's Restricted products

Matt,

I need the following information requested by the customer access group (see e-mail below). I also need to know if your current product numbers and when you want to transfer them over to the "Restricted" Product types.  Please let me know as soon as you can.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sever, Stephanie
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Lozano, Melba
Cc:	Lees, Lisa; Cass, Robert B.
Subject:	RE: Matt Lenhart's Restricted products

Melba,

I have made all of the changes with the exception of adding the following:

Aquila Risk Management Corp - Not approved for Physical trading
PG&E Core - Not EOL counterparty
TransCanada Gas Service - need clarification TransCanada Gas Services Inc. or TransCanada Gas Services, a division of TransCanada Energy Ltd.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Would you like me to follow up with Matt on the TransCanada issue.

Thanks,
Stephanie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lozano, Melba
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Sever, Stephanie
Cc:	Lees, Lisa; Cass, Robert B.
Subject:	Matt Lenhart's Restricted products

Stephanie,

I have compared the lists and this is what I found:

 << File: Restricted Customer List.xls >>
This is what you sent me.

 << File: PG&E Topock Restricted list.xls >>
This is Matt's list.

Let me know if I can help you at all with anything you need.

Thank you,

Melba


What did you have in mind?

Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:

> maybe I shsould make something differnt on xmas day
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:40 AM
>    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>
>    What time do you think we should start?  Don't forget to make enough
>    double
>    baked potatoes for 2 days.
>
>    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>
>    > No-really-the menu is not that big of a deal-the most important thing
>    to me
>    > is that we all share Christmas together.  We can eat weinies for all I
>    > care.
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 3:20 PM
>    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >
>    >    Sounds like you want to make a suggestion.  What is it?
>    >
>    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >
>    >    > I'm easy-the menu is fine-you guys can also talk it over at
>    >    Thanksgiving
>    >    >
>    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 2:41 PM
>    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >
>    >    >    Yes, nothing is set in stone.  I really have not discussed the
>    menu
>    >    with
>    >    >    anybody.  What would you perfer?
>    >    >
>    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >
>    >    >    > does it matter
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 1:58 PM
>    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    Thanks-  Do you like my menu for Christmas?
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    > will bring you back some cajun chef at Chistmas
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 11:42 AM
>    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    I like to make my own chili.  I load it up with
>    beans,
>    >    Sue
>    >    >    uses
>    >    >    >    pork and
>    >    >    >    >    beans(it's O.K.), but I like the beans mom used to
>    use.
>    >    I
>    >    >    was
>    >    >    >    told I
>    >    >    >    >    needed
>    >    >    >    >    to put a little more kick into my chili, so I
>    figured
>    >    that I
>    >    >    would
>    >    >    >    ask
>    >    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    best-JOE.
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    Hey, for Christmas, I will provide the Ham and all
>    the
>    >    >    >    >    beer,wine,pop,liquor,
>    >    >    >    >    pie,chips , nuts and bread. I will have Amy make
>    some
>    >    >    barbacued
>    >    >    >    weiners.
>    >    >    >    >    I will
>    >    >    >    >    need you to make double baked potatoes. I will have
>    Jean
>    >    bring
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    polish
>    >    >    >    >    sausage and corn/greenbeans.  I may get some
>    sourerkraut
>    >    and
>    >    >    >    dumplins
>    >    >    >    >    from
>    >    >    >    >    Stoysich also.  I will tell dad that he can pay for
>    the
>    >    ham.
>    >    >    >    >    I will have Joey bring a relish trey  and some
>    lasagne.(
>    >    I
>    >    >    thought
>    >    >    >    it
>    >    >    >    >    was
>    >    >    >    >    pretty good)
>    >    >    >    >    Do we need anything else? We are all off on that
>    day, so
>    >    we
>    >    >    can
>    >    >    >    start
>    >    >    >    >    the party
>    >    >    >    >    as early as 3P.M. or earlier if you think, my guess
>    is
>    >    that
>    >    >    you
>    >    >    >    will be
>    >    >    >    >    at the
>    >    >    >    >    casino that morning. Please advise.
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    > since when do you cook-Ithought Sue did everything
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>
>    @ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:14 PM
>    >    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    I need his recipe. We had a chili cookoff and I
>    made
>    >    my
>    >    >    own
>    >    >    >    chili
>    >    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    >    came in
>    >    >    >    >    >    3rd out of 5 people.  I beat 2 women, but My
>    chili
>    >    was
>    >    >    not
>    >    >    >    spicey
>    >    >    >    >    >    enough.
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    > Cajun Chef-can only get it here.  Too bad.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski"
>    <jmalisz@qwest.com>
>    >    @ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:33
>    PM
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    You mean the stuff you buy or the gas that
>    >    comes out
>    >    >    of
>    >    >    >    my
>    >    >    >    >    butt
>    >    >    >    >    >    after I
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    make chili.  Speaking of chili, what does
>    Joe
>    >    put in
>    >    >    his
>    >    >    >    to
>    >    >    >    >    spice
>    >    >    >    >    >    it up.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    > All the gas stocks getting hammered.
>    Natural
>    >    gas
>    >    >    is
>    >    >    >    >    bursting at
>    >    >    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    seams.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    > Your bill should go way down
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski"
>    >    <jmalisz@qwest.com>
>    >    >    @ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001
>    12:19
>    >    PM
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    I ordered the pies for our big
>    >    Thanksgiving day
>    >    >    >    feast at
>    >    >    >    >    >    Jeanies.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    Wish
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    you could be there.  Dad is bringing
>    the
>    >    beer,
>    >    >    he
>    >    >    >    said
>    >    >    >    >    one  12
>    >    >    >    >    >    pack
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    would do, I told him to bring a case,
>    just
>    >    in
>    >    >    case
>    >    >    >    >    someone
>    >    >    >    >    >    wants
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    more
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    that one can. I know that Joan is not
>    >    coming to
>    >    >    >    dinner.
>    >    >    >    >    >    Should we
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    invite her to Christmas or wait for
>    her to
>    >    >    call.
>    >    >    >    If
>    >    >    >    >    you
>    >    >    >    >    >    ever
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    talk to
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    her, you may want to mention that her
>    >    father is
>    >    >    >    still
>    >    >    >    >    alive
>    >    >    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    lives in
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    the same house that she was raised
>    in.  I
>    >    hope
>    >    >    she
>    >    >    >    comes
>    >    >    >    >    for
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    Christmas.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    If she doesn't, I doubt that I will
>    ever
>    >    invite
>    >    >    to
>    >    >    >    >    anything
>    >    >    >    >    >    again.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    But
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    that is that fucking Links "better
>    that
>    >    >    everybody
>    >    >    >    >    >    else"attitude.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    I
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    might just turn that sideways and
>    stick it
>    >    up
>    >    >    his
>    >    >    >    German
>    >    >    >    >    ass.
>    >    >    >    >    >    Hey
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    our
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >    stock is going up, how bout yours?
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    > This e-mail is the property of Enron
>    Corp.
>    >    and/or
>    >    >    its
>    >    >    >    >    relevant
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    affiliate and may contain confidential and
>    >    >    privileged
>    >    >    >    material
>    >    >    >    >    for
>    >    >    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    sole use of the intended recipient (s).
>    Any
>    >    review,
>    >    >    use,
>    >    >    >    >    >    distribution or
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    disclosure by others is strictly
>    prohibited. If
>    >    you
>    >    >    are
>    >    >    >    not
>    >    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    >    intended
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    recipient (or authorized to receive for
>    the
>    >    >    recipient),
>    >    >    >    please
>    >    >    >    >    >    contact
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
>    and
>    >    delete
>    >    >    all
>    >    >    >    copies
>    >    >    >    >    of
>    >    >    >    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    message. This e-mail (and any attachments
>    >    hereto)
>    >    >    are not
>    >    >    >    >    intended
>    >    >    >    >    >    to be
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
>    create
>    >    or
>    >    >    evidence
>    >    >    >    a
>    >    >    >    >    binding
>    >    >    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
>    (or
>    >    any of
>    >    >    its
>    >    >    >    >    affiliates)
>    >    >    >    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    the intended recipient or any other party,
>    and
>    >    may
>    >    >    not be
>    >    >    >    >    relied on
>    >    >    >    >    >    by
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    anyone as the basis of a contract by
>    estoppel
>    >    or
>    >    >    >    otherwise.
>    >    >    >    >    Thank
>    >    >    >    >    >    you.
>    >    >    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************


Rex, please proceed with the meetings.  Thank you. Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Rex
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:06 PM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	FW: Media Questions
Importance:	High

JVD:  I left you a voice mail re these general issues.  Because of the confusion of the day, and because the Wilmer Cutler folks are here, does it make sense to meet with them at least once a day to coordinate our disclosure throughout the Company?   Rex

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Despain, Tim; Rogers, Rex; Haedicke, Mark E.; Bowen Jr., Raymond; McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	Media Questions
Importance:	High

We have received the following questions from the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg.  We will not necessarily respond, but would you please provide answers and let me know your view whether or not we should respond to the following:

Have you had any further contact from Fitch? (DeSpain)

Has there been a change in status to the SEC inquiry?  Which office is handling - Fort Worth? (Rogers)

Have you been contacted by the Federal Reserve or any other agency conducting an investigation? (Rogers)

Have you been in contact with or retained bankruptcy counsel? (Haedicke)

Have you been contacted about a takeover - Royal Dutch, GE?

Have you retained Goldman Sachs to advise you on credit rating, financing issues or to find a strategic partner?  Will they receive an equity stake to help Enron get out of its current situation?  (Bowen)

These reporters are on deadline tonight, so let me know as soon as possible.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


Dear Jeff:

I learned about your decision to resign from the CEO role at Enron. As a
McKinsey alum who has watched you transform Enron from a pipeline operator
to the world's foremost energy/trading company, it is hard for me to imagine
Enron without you.  Enron's strategies based on 'options thinking' and
investments in growth options inspired my work on 'real options' which
turned out to be the winner in McKinsey's worldwide Practice Olympics in
1995 (thought you might like a copy of an offshoot).

I left McKinsey to join Morgan Stanley in 1997 and I am currently running
KnowledgeCube, a venture capital firm with a couple of McKinsey alums such
as Ali Hanna (Stamford) and some classmates from MIT.  Our Advisors include
the Heads of Entrepreneurship at MIT, Stanford, Harvard, CMU and Cornell.
Our investors include Rajat Gupta of McKinsey, the CEO Hughes Networks and
MDs from institutions such as AIG and CSFB.

KnowledgeCube has just launched a $150M Energy Fund which would invest in IT
companies that seek to enhance the productivity of the energy sector.  We
have partnered with some folks with global relationships and knowledge of
the space including Lord Cecil Parkinson (Energy Secretary of UK).

I was wondering if I could persuade you to be a part of the KnowledgeCube
network as a Lead Partner, Advisor or Investor.  I will arrange to send some
more information on KnowledgeCube and the proposed Energy Fund to your home
address if that is OK with you.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Max P. Michaels
KnowledgeCube Ventures
One Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020
212-632-3500
www.KnowledgeCube.com

 - McKarticle1.pdf


I think it is important to get estimates from the litigation group and from
outside counsel on major matters. I am not going to lose any sleep if we dont
get something on the Grynberg/Quinque cases from outside counsel because
frankly there has not been a lot of activity and our fractional share of
joint bills for matters would be relatively small.


What is your work phone number?


Cheney's office asked us to fax them prior to the meeting a document on what
we intend to talk about.  Rick and I agreed to send the document we gave to
Karl Rove a couple of weeks ago.  We sent this to Rosie so that she could fax
it to Cheney.  She showed it to Ken first.  He had edits to the document.
They are below.
FYI.  The document, as revised, is being faxed to Cheney now.
----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 04/13/2001 09:11 AM -----

	Carolyn Cooney
	04/13/2001 08:37 AM

		 To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: REVISED White House Document

Rosie,

Here are the changes that Mr. Lay made.

Thanks,
Carolyn


Kevin Ruscetti would like to trade Physical Index transactions for delivery
to ANR ML7 based on the above referenced Index. He tells me that it is widely
known that delivery at ANR ML7 is secondary firm, and states that if allowed
to transact on this the language would need to state that the parties would
employ their 'best efforts' to deliver.

Joe - can you try and find me some Confirm language for this.

Comments, please.


Here's how I would do it.

 (llc and its permitted assignees hereinafter referred to as "Optionee"), and
____________________________________, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability,

This is consistent with option.  Revise like this and send out again to
Herman.

thanks
ckm

From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/25/2001 10:29 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Form of Memorandum of Option Question

Kay,  Herman suggested the changes to our form of Memorandum (in red).  My
question is, since we are defining Optionee as "________________________,
LLC, its designee or permitted assignees"  is it really necessary to include
the second reference to designee or permitted assignees?

This MEMORANDUM OF PURCHASE OPTION (this "Memorandum") is made and entered
into effective as of the _____________________, 2001 by and between
_______________________________ (hereinafter referred to as "Optionor"), and
____________________________________, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability,
OR ITS DESIGNEE OR PERMITTED ASSIGNEES (hereinafter referred to as
"Optionee").  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning given to them in that certain Option to Purchase Real Estate dated
__________________________, 2001, by and between Optionor and Optionee (the
&Agreement8).

Optionor and Optionee are parties to the Agreement covering certain real
property situated in ____________________________ County, ______________, and
more particularly described on Exhibit &A8 attached hereto and incorporated
for all purposes (the &Property8).  Pursuant to the Agreement, Optionor
granted to Optionee an option to purchase the Property (the &Option8), as
more particularly described therein, which Option expires _____________
(subject to Optionee,s rights to extend the Option for ___________ renewal
term(s) of ______________ (____) months ending ________________________,
unless Optionee, ITS DESIGNEE OR ITS PERMITTED ASSIGNEE delivers to Optionor
a notice of exercise of its option to purchase the Property prior to such
expiration date, as may be extended.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


Vegas trip was pretty interesting.  Give me a call tonight if you get a chance.  Try the cell phone any time after 4:30 (Houston time) -
(713) 775-6472.

If I'd spent any longer  than three days in that town I'd be dead right now.  I think the earliest I made it back to my room was around 6:45 am.


By the way, what is POR?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


1. Only send your timesheet if you have taken time off/rotation information
has changed. Sorry, we are no longer tracking overtime since you are salary
based. To all A/A Pool members: it is important that you let us know of any
time you have taken off. To those members who are sending time on to your
assistant, please make sure they forward that information on to the A/A
program. With the Roll Out of SAP, you have the ability to go on-line @
http://ehronline.enron.com/ and input your time. I will continue to email for
timesheets regardless if you go on-line. This is to let you know it is time
to input your time or fills out your timesheet.
2. If you have moved recently, please provide the following and indicate the
new changes when sending your timesheet.

NEW ROTATION:
Business Unit and Group:
Effective Date:
Location:
Extension:
Supervisor:
Supervisor's Location:
Supervisor's Extension:
Supervisor's Assistant:
Assistant's Location:
Assistant's Extension:
Co #
RC #

3. Quick reminder that you can pick up your check or past period check @ EB
1198 (if they are not already coming to your location/mail stop).

Thank You for Your Cooperation
RT


You are cordially invited to  join

Assemblyman Keith Richman,  M.D.

and his very special guest

Mr. Arnold  Schwarzenegger

for  dinner

Thursday evening, May 31,  2001

6:00 Reception / 6:15 VIP Photo  Reception / 7:00 Dinner

The Odyssey Restaurant

15600 Odyssey Drive? Granada  Hills, California

Dinner $250 per person /  Photo Reception $1,000 per couple / VIP  Sponsors
$3,000 per table

Formal invitation to  follow

For more information please call

Sabina Pellissier

(866) 795-6679 (Toll  Free)

?

Checks should be made payable and  sent to:
Friends of Keith  Richman?
ID#1232100
1020 11th Street, Suite  220
Sacrmento, CA  95814


Here is the draft.  Prior to sending to customer, Jay please look at the MAC language and advise is it needs to be reworded.  Also, is this a political sub-division? If so, I will need to add a provision for same.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Imperial Irrigation District

Debra,

A couple of weeks ago, Jay Williams sent a credit worksheet to you to prepare an Enfolio agreement for Imperial Irrigation District.  I will be forwarding an RFP response to them Friday which is required to include our draft contract.  I haven't received a copy of this draft.  Could you forward this to me at your earliest convenience?

Thanks,

Kim Ward


Elizabeth, we issued late on Friday (as invoice date was May 20 (Sunday) and
it was a long weekend) here the April invoices which were hand marked either
April 1-12 (pre-petition) and April 13-30 (post-petition).  A couple of
questions:  (i) is there anything more we need to do with these invoices,
particularly to recover post-petition receivables?  (ii) do we need to send
copies of the invoices to you or anyone else?

Peter.