Per our phone call... I changed the deal ticket to match reality of 1174/day.
Robert will path as a buy/sell in unify.

Chris Germany@ECT
03/14/2000 01:45 PM
To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Orwell & Lakeside - Enron IPP

I'm a bad person.  I forgot to tell you I sold CES 880 to 1000 day at the
pool starting tomorrow on deal 217775

Also, I just sold CES 2500/day at CGLF Mainline starting the 16th-31st, deal
217854.  This gas is for Atistech.  I assume we schedule that.

Joan Veselack@ENRON
03/14/2000 12:58 PM
To: bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
ltippet@columbiaenergygroup.com, dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Orwell & Lakeside - Enron IPP

Brian said the deal was done with Chris to use Enron's IPP. This has been
scheduled.

TCO cannot attached Enron's FSS (storage) to Orwell and Lakesides GTS
contracts. TCO could do an inground storage transfer between Enron and these
accounts, however storage withdrawal and injection fees would be charged.

Per my other e-mail... we are on target in getting the total gas withdrawn
from storage for  March. There is no need to do outside deals to get
additional storage gas out of the ground. If you do outside deals, this just
changes the amount of storage that goes to Choice.

Thanks.

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/14/2000 10:58:19 AM
To: " - *Tippett, Lee" <ltippet@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: " - *joan_veselack@enron.com" <joan_veselack@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Orwell & Lakeside

We are using #51407.

Lee Tippett
03/14/2000 11:55 AM

To: joan_veselack@enron.com
cc: Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Orwell & Lakeside

Please nominate the following volumes baseload for the rest of March starting
on March 15, 2000:

Using Orwell's contract #37962 please nominate 850/day from the pool you and
Brian Perrone agree upon.

Using Lakeside's contract #37979 please nominate300/day from the pool you and
Brian Perrone agree upon.

Please forward to JoAnne Collins if you would, I don't have her e address.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.


Let's say tomorrow at 6am.  See you then unless I hear back from you.

Kevin


print
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 10:01 AM -----

	Maureen Raymond@ENRON
	Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
	02/26/2001 07:48 AM

		 To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pushkar Shahi/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Stuart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Ellen Su/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, Trena McFarland/NA/Enron@Enron, Jurgen
Hess/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, jennifer.fraser@enron.com,
anna.mehrer@enron.com, sgibner@enron.com, gmcclel@enron.com,
stuart.staley@enron.com, harora@enron.com, eric.boyt@enron.com,
shurwit@enron.com, shane.dallmann@enron.com, aaron.armstrong@enron.com,
john.allario@enron.com, andrea.v.reed@enron.com, joverdy@enron.com,
paul.mead@enron.com, john.sherriff@enron.com, richard.harper@enron.com, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael J
Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Ruffcorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
cindy.hudler@enron.com, mark.ruane@enron.com, mog.heu@enron.com,
alex.mcleish@enron.com, chris.mahoney@enron.com, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Haggerty/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Profir/LON/ECT@ECT, Yana Kristal/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT, jshankm@enron.com, david.foti@enron.com,
suzanne.ferlic@enron.com, tom.mckeever@enron.com, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
David Dupre/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: GMM - 23 Feb 2001

Please find attached this weeks' Global Markets Monitor, dated 23 Feb 2001.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda and
Gwyn Koepke


Expense Management System (XMS) version 6.01 is now available to current
users.  You can access the system from the Enron Home Page by typing in the
address field http://xms.enron.com.

The new system features coding validation at the line item level and supports
inter-company transactions . The foreign currency activity window is now more
user-friendly.

LOGON ID:
Each night HR information is loaded automatically into XMS.  However, that
process is not yet finalized.  An incomplete load can result in some people
having their old ID (first initial and last name in lower case) and some
having their eHRonline ID (begins with the letter &P8).  If your old logon
does not work, try your &P8 logon.

PASSWORD
 The password for all is upper case ENRON.  The system will guide you through
confirming your information and changing your password.  The Enron Code of
Ethics prohibits the sharing of passwords and logging on as another person.
Please observe Enron,s policy.

ACCESS
If you need access to the system, go to the IT Central Web Page and select
Services>Access
If you forget your password, call the Resolution Center at 713-853-1411.

TRAINING
Go to the IT Central web page from Enron Home Page )select
Services>Training>Enrollment>XMS.
If no classes are listed, call the training department and place your request
713-853-1816.

DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page*select
Services>Training>Documentation>XMS.

APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Accounts Payable no longer provides an application help desk.  Do not call
A/P on questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data.  Call the ISC help desk at 713-345-4SAP.


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011222.txt


I thought about giving you a personal Happy Birthday wake up call this
morning when I got up, but I thought after the night before you probably
needed all the sleep you could get.  So see here I was being nice...there's
just no pleasing some people.

I got home about 10 last night which I was pretty excited about.  But no
sooner did I get comfortable as I got a call from Rock.  AAAAAAHHHHHHHH.
Sorry that just slipped out.  I'll have to vent later.

I'll give you a birthday call later.
Robin

Gabriel Monroy
12/13/2000 08:00 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks

Don't you think that you are going to get away with just leaving a message.
I am waiting for a more personal Happy Birthday call.

Thanks anyways.

What time did you get out of here yesterday?

Gabriel


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041411.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 170.00 / Final: 160.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: CALP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  20.00 / Final:   9.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: NCPA
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


schedule and file.  I will be presenting at this meeting.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:53 PM -----

	Rebecca Carter
	Sent by: Kelly Johnson
	01/19/2001 11:27 AM
	Please respond to kelly.johnson

		 To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, peggy_fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David Cox/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Elliott/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Terry West/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie
McGinnis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia
Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol Ann Brown/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Elaine Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development,
Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathy
McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren
Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa Wright/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Stewart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mrudula
Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Connie
Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Greer/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES,
Jennifer T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Board of Directors Meeting - February 13, 2001


Anyone have any brilliant ideas on how we can produce this information?  In
the meantime, Sue and I can prolong having to produce the information until
we negotiate a confidentiality agreement.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 05:20 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
03/01/2001 05:11 PM

To: "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'" <Mary.Hain@enron.com>, Christian.Yoder@enron.com
cc: "\"Jeffrey Watkiss\" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> @ ENRON"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.comdwatkiss>, Bill.Williams.III@enron.com,
Chris.Mallory@enron.com, Christian.Yoder@enron.com,
Harry.Kingerski@enron.com, James.D.Steffes@enron.com, Jeff.Richter@enron.com,
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com, Mark.Palmer@enron.com, Richard.Sanders@enron.com,
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, "cc:
\"Ronald Carroll\"" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, Tim.Belden@enron.com, "Fergus,
Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>, mday@gmssr.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com
Subject: RE: CAISO Notice: ISO FERC Tariff Amendment 33 - Guidelines for S
ubmitting Costand Supporting Data Docum

Mary,
 One of the issues in January that helped us along the path of not
reporting to FERC December over cap sales in addition to not being required
yet under the tariff was the question of how to match cost to sales in
California.  If the data is due tomorrow, we will need to decide how to
resolve that issue first thing tomorrow.

Thanks
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary.Hain@enron.com [mailto:Mary.Hain@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Christian.Yoder@enron.com
Cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> @ ENRON;
Bill.Williams.III@enron.com; Chris.Mallory@enron.com;
Christian.Yoder@enron.com; Harry.Kingerski@enron.com;
James.D.Steffes@enron.com; Jeff.Richter@enron.com;
Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com; Mark.Palmer@enron.com; Mary.Hain@enron.com;
Richard.Sanders@enron.com; Sarah.Novosel@enron.com;
steve.c.hall@enron.com; Susan.J.Mara@enron.com; cc: "Ronald Carroll";
Tim.Belden@enron.com; gfergus@brobeck.com; mday@gmssr.com;
sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com
Subject: Re: CAISO Notice: ISO FERC Tariff Amendment 33 - Guidelines for
Submitting Costand Supporting Data Docum

The ISO is now saying that it has the authority to require EPMI to report
our prices over the price cap pursuant to Section 4.5.1of its Market
Monitoring Protocol.  This provision gives the Market Surveillance Unit
very broad authority to request information, specifically: "the submission
of any infomration or data determined by the Market Surveillance Unit to be
potentially relevant by ISO Participants, the PX or other entities whose
activies may affect the operation of the ISO market."

Apparently EPMI had some December sales over the cap.  The FERC did not
order us to report these December sales to FERC but the ISO is now
requesting it.  I think our only available approach is to provide the
information to the ISO pursuant to a confidentiality agreement.  I have
asked Sue Mara if she would contact WPTF about negotiating a
confidentiality agreement.  Richard, please advise if this is the proper
course of action.  Please note, the information is due tomorrow.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic09515.pcx)
Christian Yoder
(Embedded image moved to file: pic17964.pcx)
03/01/2001 08:30 AM

To:   "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> @
      ENRON<Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <Bill.Williams.III@enron.com>,
      <Chris.Mallory@enron.com>, <Christian.Yoder@enron.com>,
      <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>,
      <Jeff.Richter@enron.com>, <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>,
      <Mark.Palmer@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
      <Richard.Sanders@enron.com>, <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>,
      <steve.c.hall@enron.com>, <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>, cc: "Ronald
      Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <Tim.Belden@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: CAISO Notice: ISO FERC Tariff Amendment 33 - Guidelines  for
      Submitting Costand Supporting Data Docum  (Document link: Mary Hain)

I agree with Dan.  Have we sold above the cap?  If so, report.  If not,
tell them we will let them know when we do.----cgy

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Jeffrey Watkiss"
 pic23342.pcx) <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>
               03/01/2001 07:00 AM

To:   <Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <Bill.Williams.III@enron.com>,
      <Chris.Mallory@enron.com>, <Christian.Yoder@enron.com>,
      <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, <James.D.Steffes@enron.com>,
      <Jeff.Richter@enron.com>, <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>,
      <Mark.Palmer@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
      <Richard.Sanders@enron.com>, <Sarah.Novosel@enron.com>,
      <steve.c.hall@enron.com>, <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
cc:   "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>, <Tim.Belden@enron.com>
Subject:  Re: CAISO Notice: ISO FERC Tariff Amendment 33 - Guidelines  for
      Submitting Costand Supporting Data Docum

If we haven't sold anything over the cap, then I would go with #3:  Report
that we haven't and that we shan't report until we do.

>>> <Mary.Hain@enron.com> 02/28/01 07:03PM >>>
By a letter in early January, the ISO told EPMI that FERC's order accepting
the ISO's Tariff Amendment No. 33 had ordered EPMI to report to the ISO
transactions above the price cap.  We reviewed the FERC Order and concluded
that the FERC had imposed no such obligation.  We decided to do nothing
rather than explain this in a letter to the ISO because the letter could be
quoted out-of-context in the newspaper.  Moreover, it's my understanding
that we have done no transactions over the cap, so, even if the ISO has
correctly interpreted the tariff there would be nothing to provide the ISO.

The ISO is now threatening (see attached E-mail) to bring enforcement
actions against parties that do not report to the ISO transactions above
the price cap (whether or not the transactions are out-of-market).  I could
do one of several things for you at this point:
   Stay quiet
   Send the letter (see attached letter to Eric Hilderbrandt)
   Send the ISO a letter saying we haven't sold anything over the cap and
   will not report unless and until we do
   Call the FERC hotline and ask them to get the ISO off our back
   Ask Sue or Joe to mobilize some action by WPTF or EPSA

I am fearful that if we stay quiet, the ISO will put us on a list (like the
"Dirty 13" list) and we'll end up in the press again.  To lay low, I'm
inclined to pursue options 3 or 4.  What do others think?  Traders - please
verify my understanding about our transactions with the ISO.
(See attached file: Letter to Eric Hilderbrandt.doc)
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 03:39
PM ---------------------------

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Fuller, Don"
 pic05565.pcx) <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com>
               02/28/2001 03:19 PM

Please respond to "Hildebrandt, Eric" <EHildebrandt@caiso.com>

Sent by:  "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>

To:   ISO Market Participants

<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PAR
TICIPANTS@caiso.com>

cc:
Subject:  CAISO Notice: ISO FERC Tariff  Amendment 33 - Guidelines for Subm
      itting Cost and Supporting Data Documentation.

Attached is information regarding the ISO FERC Tariff Amendment 33 and
reporting guidelines including where to send the requested information.

If you have any questions, please contact Eric Hildebrandt at (916)
608-7123
or EHildebrandt@caiso.com.

>  <<DMA_Letter_Feb27.doc>>  <<DMA Cost Reporting Guidelines.doc>>
>
> Eric Hildebrandt
> Manager of Market Monitoring
> California Independent System Operator
> (916) 608-7123
>

(See attached file: DMA_Letter_Feb27.doc)
(See attached file: DMA Cost Reporting Guidelines.doc)

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


It was good to see a fellow Yankee down in these here parts.  I got some
really good feedback from all the people I talked with.  I think that UT
would be a good fit for what I'm trying to do afterwards - with there
energy-finance concentration and investment fund.  Plus it would be fun
living in Austin for a couple of years.  When your in Houston next time wh
can grab some drinks and go to dinner.  Talk to you soon.
Ben


David Nadel
212 East 84th St. 5A
New York, NY 10028
dnadel@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

David
David Nadel


Attached for your review, please find a blacklined copy of the
above-referenced agreement marked to show changes to the previously
distributed draft.
Please call me should you have any comments or questions.


1.  One director
2.     Probably Global Finance, depending on the structure of the deal.
3.     Humm.
4.    I guess I see the question as the overall role of outside counsel in
the transaction.  Good discussion item.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole on 04/16/2001 02:14 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: 4 Unrelated Issues

Please call, I have 4 four unrelated issues which I need to discuss:

1.   Whether in CA Power Development and Salmon, Enron will appoint any
officers or directors after it has reduced its ownership interest to 20%?

2.  Who besides Christy Nicolay and Herman Manis should review Ameren
interconnect agreements?

3.  Handling and payment of Piper Marbury past legal bills.

4.  Want to discuss appropriateness of involving outside counsel for water
supply agreements with local water utilities for two Georgia power projects.

Thanks.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


What kind of publicity have we been receiving over the weekend?
I'm glad to hear that you're doing better.  You didn't look too good Friday.
We had a great flight to Sao Paulo and then on to Houston.  I highly
recommend going out of your way to fly Continental.
Mark is in Portland for a few days.  We are in competition (with Broadband)
for our star paralegal, but I don't give up easily.  Shari did announce to me
about her departure and may tell the paralegals today (I hope)
Lynn and I are preparing a recap memo and we'll send a draft to you soon for
comment
Talk to you soon.  Sara


An issue has been raised whether masters can be sent out prior to HSR approval.  There is not a problem with more general marketing.  We need to have a meeting with the marketers and the lawyers later in the week to come to conclusion on this issue.  This should not in any way slow down the work on the forms!


Start Date: 12/17/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121711.txt


please approve this for me or come help me to approve it.

thank you

scott

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	<<Concur Expense Document>> - Travel

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Chris L. Germany
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Travel
Report Total: $436.02
Amount Due Employee: $436.02

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


You go girl!

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron Name Change

This has been, and still is a serious problem.  There are some reports and
information I can't get to
now because of it.  I'm working with Transco on it.

Bev

Chris Germany
02/23/2000 08:16 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary L Payne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Name Change

I didn't have this email when I left yesterday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 08:01
AM ---------------------------

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 02/22/2000 04:09:06 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Name Change

Chris and Judy,
Please pass on to any of your folks who need to know that we've completed
the name change from Enron Cap & Trade to Enron North America.  Your new
business party number is 7973.
Let me know if any problems arise.  Thanks.   ii


Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Internet Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 10, Number 25, October 2, 2000

Part 1 of 2 Parts

Longhorns Find Running Game Just in Time
To Maul OSU in Big 12 Opener; OU Next Foe

The Longhorns ran over, around and through the Oklahoma State Cowboys and
their No. 1-rated rushing defense Saturday en route to a 42-7 victory before
a sellout crowd in Austin.
The Cowboys, while they hadn't played a good rushing team in their first
three games, had allowed only 91 net yards rushing all season and they really
do have a pretty salty front seven.
Led by sophomore Kenny Hayter's 122 yards, the Longhorns had 205 net yards
rushing. It was the first time Texas has has 100 net rushing yards in a game
since the 58-7 thumping of Texas Tech last season.
In the six games they played between Texas Tech and Oklahoma State when they
couldn't reach the century mark in rushing, it's no coincidence that they won
just twice.
But they utilized a new gap-blocking technique  to combat the Cowboys'
stunting defense, and it worked to near perfection because Hayter, who was a
little used third-team tailback, turned a lot of little holes into big ones
with his hard running.
While the rebirth of the running game was the big overall story, it didn't
happen until the second half and UT had a shaky 10-7 lead at that point.
Texas still might have lost the game without three crucial earlier
developments )  a huge passing play, a great defensive stand after still
another special teams goof and a penalty against the Cowboys that wiped out a
potentially game-turning interception.
The huge passing play, of course, was Major Applewhite's 96-yard pass-and-run
connection with sensational freshman WR Roy Williams six minutes deep into
the second half
The Horns were holding a fragile 10-7 lead at the time, they were facing a
third-and-14 and they had already had so many problems with  their punting
team that UT fans everywhere were simply hoping for a miracle first down.
After all, coaches everywhere say the first five minutes of the second half
is the most crucial period in a tight game, and the first five minutes had
been all Oklahoma State. The Longhorns hadn't even made a first down since
the intermission.
But they got a lot more than that. Williams got past the Cowboy cornerback
who was covering him and Applewhite looked left and drew the safety back
toward the middle.
When he finally looked to the right and heaved the ball, the only question
was whether Williams could catch up to it because there are few people in
college football who can catch the fleet freshman.
He did, catching it on his fingertips and racing untouched the rest of the
way. That 96-yard play gave Texas a 17-7 lead and it was all downhill after
that for the Longhorns.
But that play was a gamebreaker only because the Longhorn defense stopped the
Cowboys cold early in the second quarter when a fake punt lost yardage and
put OSU in possession at the UT 38, and because an interception of a Chris
Simms' pass and a long runback inside the UT 10 was negated by a personal
foul penalty against the Cowboys.
The defensive stand came on the series after a blocked UT punt set up OSU's
only touchdown. The Cowboys were leading, 7-3, and the Longhorns, at that
point, hadn't generated enough offense to indicate they could fall farther
behind.
The disallowed interception was a possible 10-point swing because OSU might
have scored with a first-and-goal inside the UT 10. Instead, the Horns kept
the ball and continued a drive that ended in the field goal that opened the
scoring.

Here, briefly, is how the game went:

FIRST QUARTER
Neither team threatened early, but the Horns dodged a bullet on their second
possession. They started in good field possession, but Simms threw an
interception that was run back inside the UT 10 before a personal foul
against OSU negated the play and gave Texas a first down at the OSU 29. Texas
couldn't move and Stockton kicked a 45-yard field goal to put the Horns
ahead, 3-0, with 7:00 left. OSU TB Reggie White broke loose for 69 yards to
the UT 11 on the Cowboys' next possession, but the UT defense held and the
Cowboys missed a chip-shot field goal try. Applewhite came in at QB for
Texas. UT led, 3-0, at the end of the quarter, but the Longhorns had only one
first down ) on the penalty that negated the long interception return ) and
just 30 yards of total offense compared to 100 for OSU.

SECOND QUARTER
The UT defense stopped OSU and forced a punt. With Applewhite still in at
QB, sophomore RB Kenny Hayter got a first down on two tough runs, then senior
TB Hodges Mitchell took a quick pitch around left end for 18 yards. But
Applewhite was sacked and his third-down pass to freshman WR B. J. Johnson
was dropped. That was unfortunate because it forced Stockton to punt, the
snap was high, a defender got loose up the middle and the kick was blocked.
Stockton covered it at the UT 30, and OSU's White scored in two plays,
galloping 21 yard to the 9, then bursting up the middle untouched for the
score to put OSU ahead, 7-3, with  9:59 left. The next UT drive also came up
short, but, facing fourth and 1 at their own 40, the Horns went with a fake
punt. It was a disaster and Stockton was tackled for a two-yard loss. But the
strong UT defense yielded only two yards in three plays and got the ball back
for the offense. On his third try, Applewhite got the Longhorns into the end
zone, driving 80 yards in seven plays. Mitchell got the TD on a 3-yard run,
but the big plays were Applewhite's passes of 15 yards to WR Montrell
Flowers, 14 yards on third-and-9 to Johnson and 36 yards to the 3 to
Williams. Stockton's kick gave Texas a 10-7 lead with 4:23 left. OSU got
close enough to try a field goal as time expired, but Ervis Hill blocked it.
UT outgained OSU, 140 to 80, in the period.

THIRD QUARTER
A combination of mishaps, including a sack and a half-the-distance penalty,
left the Longhorns facing a third and 14 from their own 4. Visions of another
punting adventure were etched into the brains of Longhorns everywhere, but
Applewhite dropped back and found Williams breaking open between double
coverage just past midfield. He heaved it and the swift freshman caught it on
his fingertips and raced untouched into the end zone to complete a 96-yard
touchdown play. Stockton's kick put UT ahead, 17-7, with 9:14 left. Lindsay
and White misfired on a handoff two plays later and  UT LB De'Andre Lewis
recovered for Texas at the 13. Hayter powered to the 1 to set up a
first-and-goal. He tried to go over the top, but the Cowboys stopped him,
then the Horns were penalized back to the 6 for a false start. Hayter got
three yards to the 3 off right tackle, but Applewhite's pass on third down
was knocked down and Stockton's 20-yard field goal gave Texas a 20-7 lead
with 6:03 left. Applewhite hit redshirt freshman WR Artie Ellis for 21 yards
and another TD with 2:11 left. A two-point conversion try failed, leaving UP
on top, 26-7, heading into the final period.

FOURTH QUARTER
With Hayter making good gains and Applewhite hitting key passes, the
Longhorns drove 58 yards to set up a 36-yard Stockton FG and moved 42 yards
for a touchdown, with Applewhite connecting with Flowers for the final 2
yards, Ivan Williams ran 21 yards for the final score with 13 seconds left.

900 Number Updated Daily

I update my 900 number daily with football and football recruiting news. The
number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 to call.

Coach's Corner

Coach Mack Brown said Sunday the Longhorn offense had its best day of the
season against Oklahoma State, the defense did its usual fine job and the
special teams, with one notable exception, were outstanding.
"After reviewing the film, it's clear that it was the best performance we've
had offensively," he said. "We scored 42 points and we had no turnovers. The
offensive line had its best performance."
"We were pleased with not only the offensive line, but Roy Williams made some
great blocks, too, and Kenny Hayter made some tough runs."
He also said junior QB Major Applewhite, who underwent off-season knee
surgery, "played like the Major of old. He made very, very few mistakes."
The Major of old was very good. He was the Big 12 Offensive Newcomer of the
Year as a redshirt freshman in 1998 and the Co-Offensive Player of the Year
as a sophomore in 1999.
Applewhite and sophomore Chris Simms have been dividing time at QB, and Simms
started the OSU game, but gave way to Applewhite late in the first quarter.
Applewhite completed 15 of 28 passes for 291 yards and three touchdowns.
Simms, who returned late in the game, completed 3 of 5 passes for 8 yards.
Brown said the defense "continues to swarm and play really well. Casey
Hampton is amazing and D. D. Lewis had an outstanding day. Quentin Jammer and
Rod Babers played really well. We had another blocked kick. that's our 12th
in 30 games here. I thought it was Tyrone Jones, but it was Ervis Hill who
blocked the field goal. It's interesting that our two best kick blockers are
both from Texas City."
The special teams played well, Brown said, except for having another punt
blocked, and he said that is something that simply has to be fixed.
"The two blocked punts this year have been in different areas," he said, "but
we have to get it fixed. We can't keep getting punts blocked."
He said the UT-OU game was such a big game 15 or 20 years ago "that the
feeling was that the team that won this game had a chance to win the national
championship." He said he and OU coach Bob Stoops "are trying to get back to
that."
INJURY UPDATE: Brown said SS Lee Jackson suited out against Oklahoma State
and should be ready to play against Oklahoma. He said DT Shaun Rogers
(sprained ankle) is questionable for the OU game. "We should know more about
Shaun Tuesday," he said. LB O. J. McClintock also missed the OSU game
(bruised knee), but he should be back this week.
BLOCKING, QUARTERBACK NOTES: The big change in the UT running game was
basically one new play - a counter with an off side guard pulling and the
linemen blocking down on the play side. The QB also handed off at least part
of the time on one side and the back veered to the other side for a little
bit of misdirection. . . Major Applewhite's knee has been one of he major (no
pun intended) reasons the coaches have tried to use Chris Simms so much in
the early games. Applewhite still isn't 100%, but he's getting closer every
week. In fact, he looked pretty close to 100% Saturday. That's just in time
because the Sooners look pretty potent and the Horns need to have two top
quarterbacks ready to go.

Baseball Recruiting Going Great

The UT  baseball coaches got a commitment last week from right-handed pitcher
Donald Lavinski, 6-4, 205, of Class AA state champion Weimar, giving them
pledges from two of the state's big three pitching recruits. They also got a
pledge from catcher Curtis Thigpen, 6-0, 175, of Forney.
Round Rock's Joey Guajardo, another right-hander, committed several months
ago. The third member of the big three pitching group is David Purcey, 6-5,
230, a left-hander from Dallas Trinity Christian. He is considering Texas,
A&M and OU.
Purcey was 21-3 at Trinity Christian the last two years and his team won
back-to-back state TAPPS' championships. He also helped his team win a state
TAPPS' title in basketball last year. He had 123 strikeouts in 75 1/3 innings
last year.
Lavinski was 14-1 last year with an outstanding 0.70 ERA. His fast ball has
been clocked as high as 93 miles per hour and he is consistently in the 90
mph range. He also has great command of a sinking fast ball and a change up.
He struck out 170 batters in 95 innings last year, while issuing about 25
walks and giving up about 40 hits.
He said he also had scholarship offers from Texas A&M, Baylor, Rice, Houston
and Oklahoma State.
Thigpen is an outstanding defensive catcher, but he also wields a potent bat,
bashing opposing pitchers for a .515 batting average last season.
He  also considered Alabama, Baylor and A&M.
Lavinski, Thigpen and Pursey all visited Texas the September 23 weekend,
along with shortstop Michael Holloman, 6-0, 165, of Dallas Jesuit.
Holloman said he is considering Texas and Stanford. He visited Texas earlier
and took his official trip to Stanford last weekend.

Horns Rise in Polls

The Longhorns are No. 11 in this week's Associated Press poll and No. 10 in
the ESPN/USA Today coaches poll. Oklahoma, this week's opponent, is No. 10 in
the AP poll and No. 12 in the coaches poll. UT is a 3-point favorite.

Basketball Stars Visit

Kala Bowers, 6-2, of Woodward, Okla., a top national recruit in girls
basketball, took her official visit to Texas last weekend.
She is considering Texas, Colorado, Illinois and Kansas State, and says Texas
and Colorado are her big two.
Heather Schreiber, a versatile 6-2 forward from Windthorst and CoCo Reed, a
5-11 forward from Jersey Village, also came to Austin last weekend. Both
committed to the Longhorns earlier.
Three top juniors also were in Austin on unofficial visits. They are  5-9
point guard Nina Norman of Jersey Village, 5-10 shooting guard Lindsay
Harding of Cypress Fairbanks and 6-1 forward Nichelle Roberts of Spring
Westfield.
Schrieber and Bowers are both rated as top 25 national recruits, and Norman
will be one of the nation's top point guard recruits next season.
Reed and Roberts play on the same high school team and they also play on the
same AAU team, along with Harding.

It's a Great Time to Subscribe
To The Fax/E-Mail Service
I'll Have Frequent Reports on Recruiting And Practice Throughout the Season
! Get Instant Updates for Pennies a Day !
Save As An E-Mail Subscriber !
The True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn
football and Longhorn recruiting ) instantly. Follow Mack Brown and the
Longhorns with frequent fax updates. There are at least 99 timely faxes a
year, primarily about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send
your check to True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip
the coupon below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail,
just include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (a $14 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange by E-Mail and to subscribe to the
99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)

Game Quotes . .

"I was really pleased today. Obviously, we were able to stay two-dimensional,
and that's what you always want to do. The offensive line play was tremendous
and Kenny Hayter gave us a spark. He broke some tackles. It brings an
excitement to you when a back breaks tackles."
) Longhorn offensive coordinator Greg Davis
* * * *
"We really had to raise our level of play in the middle with Shaun (Rogers)
and Stevie (Lee) out with injuiries. It all starts up front, and we got
pretty good play up front today."
) UT defensive coordinator Carl Reese
* * * *
"We came out and played with a lot of emotion. We were able to get some good
hits on the quarterback. When you get enough hits, the quarterback eventually
will start looking around and ducking."
) Texas defensive tackle Casey Hampton
* * * *
"At first, I though I overthrew it. I thought that was the big turning point
in the game. Roy Williams is just a great receiver. the offensive line played
great. When I got sacked, it was my fault for holding the ball too long."
) UT QB Major Applewhite, explaining his 96-yard scoring pass to Roy Willims
and the line's great protection
* * * *
"To tell you the truth, I was really nervous at first. The holes were a lot
bigger today. The line really ripped some holes. I had a lot of expectations
when I came here, but I was a little too careless with the ball The last
couple of weeks, the coaches have told me I had a chance to play a lot more."
) Sophomore RB Kenny Hayter, after sparking the Longhorns running game with
122 yards against the No. 1-ranked Cowboy defense
* * * *
"I really felt like today we kind of jelled. We opened up some holes for
Kenny (Hayter), but sometimes he made us look good with the way he ran the
ball and broke tackles."
) UT senior OT Leonard Davis
* * * *
"I couldn't go over there and tell him (Mack Brown) that, but if you are
asking if there is a difference (between the two quarterbacks), there is."
) OSU head coach Bob Simmons, when asked by an Oklahoma writer to compare
Texas' quarterbacks Major Applewhite and Chris Simms
* * * *
"Texas made adjustments and stopped the run.l You have to give them credit.
They have some great coaches and players."
) OSU RB Reggie White
* * * *
"We played hard, but they made a lot of big plays on us. We mentally broke
down."
) Cowboys' LB Chris Carter

Texas-Oklahoma State Statistics

Scoring Summary
Texas                   3           7         16       16   )    42
Oklahoma State        0           7           0        0    )      7

UT - Stockton 44 FG 7:00 1Q (18 yds, 7 plays)
OSU - White  9 run (Condley kick) 9:59 2Q (30 yds, 2 plays)
UT - Mitchell 3 run  (Stockton kick) 4:23 2Q (80 yds, 7 plays)
UT - R. Williams 96 pass from Applewhite (Stockton kick) 9:14 3Q (92 yds, 3
plays)
UT - Stockton 20 FG 6:03 3Q (10 yds, 5 plays)
UT - Ellis 21 pass from Applewhite (pass failed) 2:11 3Q (54 yds, 6 plays)
UT - Stockton 36 FG 8:39 4 Q (58 yds, 15 plays)
UT - Flowers 2 pass from Applewhite (Stockton kick) 4:22 4Q (42 yds, 8 plays)
UT - I. Williams 21 run (kick failed) 0:13  4Q (39 yds, 6 plays)

Official Attendance: 81,692

Team Statistics
Texas     Oklahoma State
First Downs                 23           12
Rushing                     11             8
Passing                     11             2
Penalty                         1              2
Rushing Attempts, Net Yards  44-205       36-168
Net Yards Passing               299        101
Passes Comp., Att., Int.        18-33-0        8-23-0
Total Plays, Offense               77-504        59-269
Avg. Gain per Play                  6.5         4.6
Fumbles Lost                        0 of  0      2 of 4
Penalties, Yards                    15-127       10-78
Punts, Avg.                     5-31.6       8-37.6
Time of Possession          31:54         28:06
Third-Down Conversions        7 of 17        2 of 13
Fourth-Down Conversions     1 of  2      1 of 2
Sacks by Team, Yds Lost     4-27          3-17

Individual Statistics

Texas
Rushing -  Hayter 20-122; Mitchell 8-50, 1 TD;  I. Williams 4-27, 1 TD; Robin
1-12; Ike 4-9; Simms 1-2; Stockton 1-minus 2; Applewhite 5-minus 15.
Passing -  Applewhite 15-28, 291 yds, 3 TDs, 0 Int.; Simms 3-5, 8 yds, 0 TD,
0 Int.
Receiving - R. Williams 5-175, 1 TD; Trissel 2-29; Flowers 4-23, 1 TD; Ellis
1-21, 1 TD; Johnson 2-15; M. Jones 2-13; Healy 1-12; Mitchell 1-11.

Oklahoma State
Rushing -  R. White 15-104, 1 TD; Bell 8-31; Fobbs 2-28; Lindsay 8-8;
Burrough 1-4; Pogi 2-minus 7.
Passing - Lindsay 7-21,  73 yds, 0 TDs, 0 Int.;Pogi 1-2, 28 yds, 0 TD, 0 Int.
Receiving - Rivers 2-41; Fobbs 3-30; Bell 1-25; K. Jackson 1-7; White 1-minus
2.

Tackles by Texas Players, Unasst., Asst., Total

Lewis 3-4-7; Hampton 3-2-5; Jammer 3-2-5; Tubbs 0-5-5; Brooks 4-0-4; Rawls
3-1-4; G. Brown 2-2-4; Thornton 0-4-4; Hayward 3-0-3; Gordon 3-0-3; Pittman
2-1-3; Pearson 2-0-2; Ungar  2-0-2; Geiggar 2-0-2; T. Jones 0-2-2; Boyd
0-2-2; Redding 1-0-1; Babers 1-0-1; Vasher 1-0-1; Trahan 0-1-1; Wilkins
0-1-1; Hightower 0-1-1.
Tackles for Losses: Thornton 1-minus 5; Jammer 1-minus 5; Lewis 1-minus 2;
Hayward 1-minus 2; Rawls 1-minus 1; Hampton 1-minus 1.
Sacks: Hampton 1-minus 9; Lewis 1-minus 6; Pittman 1-minus 6; Boyd  and Tubbs
shared 1-minus 6.


No idea

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject: FW: RE:New Unofficial Committee Contacting Decision Makers

By the way, who is Al referring to when he sais Doug is working with "Enron Central" and who has he contacted re:  "Enron guidance."  Sheesh.

-----Original Message-----
From: TOMPKINS, ROBIN
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Fwd: RE:New Unofficial Committee Contacting Decision Makers

see additional note from Doug Nichols.

-----Original Message-----
Date:  08/29/2001  09:10 am  (Wednesday)
From:  DOUGLAS NICHOLS
To:  TOMPKINS, ROBIN
Subject:  Fwd: RE:New Unofficial Committee Contacting Decision Makers

This is the latest status on Howard's effort - PGE is included in the "in favor" group in Howard's message - but both Al and I have since let him know he should not include us as being "in favor" unless and until we've coordinated this with Enron - I'm relying on you to do that.  Time is very short - Howard needs to be moving on this now if he has any shot at all of influencing the outcome.  While I agree the message ought to be delivered, I'm not optimistic there is time for the legislature to do anything else at this point.  If nothing else, it would be good let the decision makers know that their plan may not have the hoped for result, so they can't say no one told them.  dn

-----Original Message-----
Date:  08/28/2001  09:59 pm  (Tuesday)
From:  AL ALEXANDERSON
To:  "hweg@pgwlaw.com".IXGate.WIZ
CC:  DOUGLAS NICHOLS
Subject:  RE:New Unofficial Committee Contacting Decision Makers

Doug and I have been debating wether there might be a broader Enron plan to support the legislation even with the 1 billion shortage to sellers.  We're still trying to get Enron guidance on this.  Possibly we'd rather have an expensive solution instead of no solution.  I'm traveling with my  cell phone all of tomorrow and Doug is working on Enron Central.  Please stand by in terms of adding our name to the agressive list. Sorry for the mixed signals.  al

>>> "Howard J. Weg" <hweg@pgwlaw.com> 08/28/01 09:35PM >>>
I have not heard back from all members of the Unofficial Committee regarding
my email dated August 27, 2001 with respect to the proposal to contact the
Governor and Legislators regarding the pending legislation on SCE.

Some have suggested that the message needs to be stronger and others have
suggested that the message is too strong.  Our Ex Officio members BPA and
WAPA want it to be clear that they are not involved in any way with
addressing the state government on this or other issues.  As you know, I
want very much to reach as broad of a consensus on this action as is
possible, and to protect the interests of all members.

Virtually all members agree that a bankruptcy case for or litigation against
SCE would probably not be a good thing and we do not want to advocate for
bankruptcy or litigation.  After all, the Unofficial Committee was organized
to provide a different approach generally.  The purpose of contacting the
Governor and the Legislature is to let them know that the legislation they
are now considering, which leaves SCE about $1 billion short on the proposed
financing to pay creditors, may cause some other sellers to take precipitous
action in filing an involuntary petitition or initiating litigation or
arbitration that could delay or prevent the financing at even the lower $2.9
billion level, which will adversly affect SCE and all creditors generally.
We should point out that not all sellers are in agreement on what action
will be taken. The message is not intended to threaten anything and it is
not necessarily designed to stop legislation altogether, only legislation
that might actually make the situation worse for all sellers and SCE.

The tone of the presentation, if we make one, will be low key, non
threatening, and in the spirit of helping the legislature and the Governor
design a package that will avoid the bankruptcy, litigation and other
alternatives that others might be forced to consider if the bill is passed,
leaving the energy sellers out in the cold.

If there remain some members of the Committee that are not willing to be
associated with the message outlined above, then I propose that we give such
members the alternative of remaining members of the Unofficial Committee and
allowing us, if asked, to identify any such members that prefer not to be a
part of the message although they want to support an approach that avoids
litigation and bankruptcy for SCE.  I understand that the LADWP and Coral
Power would like this approach adopted.

As I explained in my prior email, it has been suggested that the proposed
bill that leaves SCE short by a billion dollars will likely pass after Labor
Day and before the Sept 14 adjournment.  That is why timing is important.
Those of you that have not responed, please respond.  Those of you that were
concerned that the message was unclear, please review this email and
consider or reconsider your positions, as the case may be.

As of right now, there are only 11 votes: 9 in favor and 2 against.  The
polls are still open so please let me know your position.

You should be aware that the City of Glendale notified me that it determined
that actual or potential conflicts of interest with the Unofficial Committee
required it to resign from the Unofficial Committee.


okey with me

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Matthews, Ron; Cherry, Paul; Rapp, Bill;
Chanley, Earl; Geaccone, Tracy; Lokey, Teb
Subject: FW: Attachment A - Payment Schedule

All,

We are still working on all the details of the proposed interconnect with Questar Southern Trails in the Blanco Hub and will send you a copy soon for your review.  Since the interconnect is fully reimbursable, Questar is proposing to pay us according to the attached payment schedule vs. paying all of it up front.

Please take a look at this attached schedule and provide me you comments.  If we allow them to pay "along the way" I am interested in making sure it at least matches the timing of our cash outlay of building the interconnect.  The total estimate of $702,000 includes the tax gross up, which may or may not be applicable, so each of these amount may be reduced by the tax amount.

Does anyone have any concerns with the timing of the payment schedule?

Thanks, Kim.
X33098
-----Original Message-----
From: Jodi Starley [mailto:JodiS@questar.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Re: Attachment A - Payment Schedule

I have attached the payment schedule for the Interconnect & Operating Agreement.  We thought you should have an electronic copy as well.  We look forward to talking with you on Friday.  Thanks.


Anurag,

I shall talk about Vikas to our IT people.
Can you send me his resume?

Vince

"Saksena, Anurag" <anurag.saksena@gmacrfc.com> on 05/07/2001 10:06:54 AM
To:	"'vkamins@ect.enron.com'" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	A personal favor

Vince,

I have  left a voice mail to you and will wait to talk to you personally. My brother  Vikas, who is now in London, is trying to make a switch from consulting world to  working for a specific firm. Over last few months, I have heard of great deal  about the success of Enron on line business which fits well in the area of his  expertise. I am wondering if you know of some one in London who he can speak to  regarding career opportunities.

Since  I spoke to you last, a number of things have changed. Recently, my manadate was  broaden to include leading a charge for developing a risk management function  for both the domestic and international businesses for GMAC. Needless to say,  this is exciting albeit making the life a little more hectic than  usual.

Talk  to you later.

Anurag

952-  857 - 6133


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron on 03/19/2001 02:05
PM ---------------------------
From: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 12:17 PM
To: James Ledlow/ENRON@enronXgate, Bradford Larson/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn
Bellinghausen/ENRON@enronXgate, Becky Caudle/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Neumin Production - REVISED POSITIONS

Neumin Team -

As you know, I have been trying to sort out a problem that we have regarding
trade N52632 with Neumin Production.  The issue surrounded the expiration
dates of the various legs of this trade, with confusion about whether those
legs were to expire in December '01 or December '02.

At the present, it is the general consensus of the Confirms/Origination teams
that the legs in question (legs 2 & 4) should expire at the end of December
'01.  I say "general consensus" because we have no clear, concrete evidence
that this expiration is correct.  Our own internal systems show a lot of
conflicting indications, so the long and the short of this "investigation" is
that we are relying on the memories of our originators to verify the terms of
the deal.

So, attached is the Neumin position spreadsheet, with updated terms for legs
2 and 4.  I have also added a sheet that shows Neumin's production profile,
based on the reserve report of 1/1/01.  Included on this sheet is a "Net
Overhedge" calculation which shows the amount of hedged production above
projected production (as of 1/1/01).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jay


Kristina, please forward as you deem necessary to EBS persons for final
approval.  Thank you.

Please see attached language concerning the Raptor swaps in respect of the
Valuation Date mechanism and advise me as soon as possible of your approval
or comments, if any.  We are trying to finalize all public swaps (save Active
Power) today, so your timeliness will be GREATLY appreciated by me!  Mary


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their VP. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081799&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081799
Request Create Date : 1/29/02 9:18:19 AM
Requested For       : scott.neal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Financial
Resource Type       : Applications


I am putting together that right now.  Thanks
Ben


Whatcha think?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 06:41
PM ---------------------------
From: Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 04:32 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BGE CA

Hi Kay!
BGE is issuing an RFP, and they have drafted the attached CA.....Can you take
a peek and see if it would be acceptable?
http://supplier.bge.com/rfp/ca.doc
Thanks!
Janelle


I don't have copies of anything.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	11/20/00 10:26 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Micron

Can't you just make changes to the one we did for ENA?

Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/20/2000 10:06 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Moulton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Micron

Tanya,

Will you send me a worksheet?

Thanks!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 11/20/00 10:09 AM -----

	Michael Moulton
	11/20/00 09:56 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Micron

Marie,

Can you put together an ISDA for Micron Technologies.  I hope you had a great
weekend.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Thanks, ,

Mike


IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin

For Power Delivered on Tuesday, November 06, 2001
(Trade Date of Monday, November 05, 2001)

Click here to access index history <http://www.intcx.com/SubscriberServlet/subscriberservlet.class?operation=powerIndexForm&hub=All>.

* volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	 High	 Low	 Wtd Avg Index	 Change ($)	 Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	$24.85	$22.00	$23.40	- 1.63	88,800
Comed	$21.25	$21.00	$21.08	- 1.80	2,400
Entergy	$28.50	$23.45	$25.41	- .48	18,400
Nepool	$36.75	$35.25	$35.77	- 3.24	7,200
Palo Verde	$34.50	$29.05	$31.56	- 1.77	4,000
PJM-West	$25.40	$24.15	$24.64	- .01	88,800
SP-15	$35.00	$30.00	$32.24	- .97	5,600
TVA	$24.10	$22.75	$23.73	- 2.13	27,200

Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.   Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com <mailto:sales@intcx.com>.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe <http://www.intcx.com/subscribe.html>.

?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Here are the most recent numbers.


Attached is a copy of a letter which we are sending to our Corporate, Enron
North America Corp., Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc., and Portland
General Electric Company vendors as an additional step toward implementing
our commitment to conduct our business affairs in accordance with the highest
ethical standards.

We are sending you a copy of this letter so that you will be aware that your
vendors will be receiving this letter and so that you will be reminded that
Enron does enlist the cooperation of its vendors in adhering to its Business
Ethics Policy.

We appreciate your efforts in contributing to an Enron work environment of
which we can all be proud.

  SAMPLE

XXXXXXXX, 19XX

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY/STATE/ZIP

Dear Sir or Madam :

 Enron Corp. ("Enron") believes in conducting its business affairs in
accordance with the highest ethical standards.  Accordingly, employees of
Enron and its subsidiaries are required to comply with Enron's Business
Ethics Policy which requires an employee to conduct himself/herself in a
manner which is not detrimental to the best interests of Enron and which does
not bring to the employee financial gain separately derived as a direct
consequence of his/her employment with Enron.  Further, Enron's Business
Ethics Policy states that no lavish entertainment or gifts are to be given or
received by Enron employees for special position, price, or privilege.

 Not only is it incumbent upon our employees to follow this policy, but your
cooperation in respecting these standards is also critical.  Enron expects
each of its vendors and contractors to maintain adequate records that
document its work relationship with Enron.  Enron's auditing department will
routinely conduct business ethics compliance audits of certain vendors and
contractors with whom Enron does business.  Your recognition of our ethical
standards allows Enron employees to work with you via arm's length
transactions and avoids potentially embarrassing and unethical situations.
If you ever become aware of variances from our policy, please advise:

James V. Derrick, Jr.
Executive Vice President and General   Counsel
(713) 853-5550	 or report
	anonymously
	to:	Enron Compliance Officer
		CONFIDENTIAL-Conduct of Business Affairs
		PO Box 1188
		Houston, Texas   77251-1188.

 Your business relationship is important to us, and we look forward to
maintaining that relationship with you.

          Very truly yours,


I attach a summary of the 11 outstanding ECC transactions under ECC's GTC:

In summary, the principal risks are:

Principal Risks:

1. Unexecuted Confirmation Letters on approx. 75,000 GJs per day
2. Receivables (approx. US $25MM pre-petition and approx. US $300K per day
post-petition)
3. MTM (aggregate negative MTM approx. US $1.9MM)

Please note:

1. I am trying to track down PG&E's back-up paper sent for each deal and will
update the chart to indicate the differences to their GTCs.  We have found
only one corresponding PG&E Confirmation Letter (for TAGG #N13588.1/2/3)
which refers to PG&E's form of unexecuted Master Agreement.  I have
summarized at the end of the chart the applicable provisions of PG&E's Master
Agreement form if it were to govern.

2. I have not been successful in tracking down Canadian insolvency counsel
over the weekend, but will keep trying.


Hi Nancy,

We are getting geared up to look at the interconnection agreement and work on
the land lease.  Just thought you might want to put it on the list of fun
things to do in the future.

Kay


Tana,
?
I am looking at the Enron job site again.? Check out  #0000104141.? Isn't
this like the one that got us started talking about me  working at Enron??
Let me know.? I don't think it is in the same  department, is it??
?
I am disappointed about the event coor. job, but guess it just  wasn't meant
to be.? Actually, I am feeling pretty yuk about the whole job  thing!!? Have
any good words of wisdom???
?
How is your house business coming along??


Attached is a draft of the material to which Seabron Adamson intends to speak
at the meeting on Thursday July 20 at Blakes office in Calgary.  I am not
sure whether Glenn Leslie has already forwarded this to you.


Karen Clapper is out of the office and will return on December 31.  Have a Merry Christmas.


Ok, you told me nothing, so I am clueless as to what is creating the
distress.  Maybe we can chat later.

We will not be in Austin in the next few months.  We are going to San Antonio
the first weekend in March, as well as the first week in April.  The first
trip is for a wedding between two friends of Trey from Rice MBA who are
marrying each other.  The other is for the Enron law conference, which is
Wed.-Friday.  We are not taking Cameron on either of those trips (party
time!!), so we will be rushing back to Houston right afterwards.

I am working with Butch Hayes at F&J.  I haven't been too involved in the
matter because it is not an Enron subsidiary, but from what I can tell, I
like him.  Any additional insight, if necessary, would be great.

Too bad you weren't in Houston a couple of weeks ago.  But, it probably would
have been a sad time for all of you, and it sounds like you don't really need
that right now.  If you visit us, we promise to be cheerful and frivolous if
you need it -- not that acting that way is too much of a chore for me.  Plus,
Cameron acts like a 2-year-old, which is a delight.  He started at a new
school a few weeks ago (The Post Oak School -- a Montessori school about a
block from our house), and he is really coming into his own.  It is amazing
how much my world has both grown and shrunk since he was born.  Little things
like seeing a squirrel in the back yard have become major events (don't even
get me started on helicopters).  On the other hand, I feel this enormous
responsibility and desire to make sure that all is right with the world.
Quite an awesome sense of obligation and discovery combined.

Enough waxing philosophical.  I've got to get out of here at some point, so
I'd better get back to work.

Later.  M

mstewart@bmoh.com on 02/15/2000 03:01:03 PM
To: Michelle.Cash@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Status

Hi Michelle!
Thanks for your message and update.

Yes, January was a tough month, and I guess I got pretty distracted by it all.
Nothing has been resolved but I've gotten over the initial shock and sadness
for my brothers. We were pretty worried about Joe for a while there because
Myra is (was?) the love of his life and he is so vulnerable. I can't remember
how much I told you over the phone (?)

Good to hear from you! We haven't been to Houston in a long time and are due
for a visit. We almost came the weekend of Feb 5-6 because a group was getting
together to go to Jay's gravesite in honor of his Feb 10th birthday. (But work
kept me here that weekend.) Hopefully sometime soon I can get over there and
see you & Trey & Cameron. Any plans to come this way? I'd love to see you.

For V-Day, we went out to eat at the Hula Hut. I picked up my brother Ed from
the airport (he had been in Santa Fe with Joe for a long weekend - we are
taking turns) and Ed came with us for our nice "romantic" dinner. Later Rog
and I went for coffee and dessert as a special treat. We still have a great
time together just talking about stuff and catching up on the day's
happenings.

Hope all is going well with the investigation - it sounded like you were in
good hands with the Fulbright lawyer. (Who is it? - Brian Grieg? Butch Hayes?)
If I can be of any help in any way, please let me know - I would love to work
with you! But, truly, I would  like to just see you again - to catch up and
have some
laughs! mms

>>> "Michelle.Cash@enron.com" 02/15/00 02:33PM >>>

Maria,

I got your voice mail a couple of weeks ago.  It sounded like you were a bit
on
the stressed out side.  I hope things have improved, and that you had a nice,
romantic Valentine's Day yesterday.  Trey and I went to the opera on Sat.
night
for our V-Day event.  We saw the Elixer of Love, which is a very light, cute,
happy-ending opera (no screeching).

I think we got the referrals taken care of on the Austin investigator issue.
Thanks for your input.

Take care, and I'll catch you later.

Michelle


Jim,

Can you meet with us tomorrow? One of my associates  worked
on a few projects with DPC and will visit them in January. His name is
Krishnarao
Pinnnamaneni and he will be gone for 3 weeks, starting Wednesday

Please, let Shirley Crenshaw, my assistant (3-5290), know what time would
work for you Tuesday.

Vince

James A Hughes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/18/2000 01:07 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dabhol Power

Vince:

As I am sure you are aware, we are facing significant challenges with the
Dabhol project.  As I have delved into the project and our problems, I have
been disturbed by our lack of information/data relative to our position in
the grid and the overall fundamentals for the region.  I would like to meet
with you and get your assistance in identifying some resources to try and
help the India team develop a better understanding of their market and how to
identify/develop/use the fundamentals.

Thanks.

Jim


The feeling on the street is that Reliant was setup with the $1900 sale.  The
word is that the bid for $1900 power had been sitting there for months and
that Reliant had an "understanding" with DWR and the ISO that the bid was not
supposed to be taken except in dire need -- it's for a peaker and the price
represents the opportunity cost of running it now, and using up its very
limited emission credits, rather than running it during the real peak times
this summer. The $1900 represents the estimated cost to Reliant of Reliant
having to buy power this summer on the market when it otherwise would have
had its peaker available.  The wors is that the state/ISO took the bid, when
there was not dire need, just to make Reliant look evil and point to ever
higher prices -- when? -- yes, the week before the Bush plan was to come out.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854

	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
	05/18/2001 07:16 AM

		 To: <gfergus@brobeck.com>, <mmilner@coral-energy.com>,
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>, <acomnes@enron.com>, <dfulton@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>,
<snovose@enron.com>, <jalexander@gibbs-bruns.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>,
<gackerman@wptf.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: Reliant's Reaction To Being Singled Out By Governor Davis

----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com> on Fri, 18 May
2001 08:12:38 -0500 -----
To:	"Justin Long" <jlong@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
cc:	"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject:	Reliant's Reaction To Being Singled Out By Governor Davis
May 17, 7:52 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

Reliant Energy Urges Governor Davis to Trade Political Fingerpointing for
Solutions

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 17, 2001--Reliant Energy strongly disagrees
with California Governor Gray Davis' recent characterization of the company
as being ``obstructionist'' and opposing court orders.

Reliant Energy believes that these accusations are politically motivated
attempts to demonize Reliant Energy as an outsider responsible for causing
the state's energy crisis. The accusations are simply not based on fact. More
importantly, the governor's attacks have done nothing to increase the state's
supply of electricity or prevent the blackouts expected this summer. If
anything, the comments have fostered an atmosphere of distrust and
uncertainty that have further destabilized the market.

``Reliant hopes the governor and others will stop these baseless accusations
and focus on true solutions to California's energy shortage,'' said Joe Bob
Perkins, president and chief operating officer, Reliant Energy Wholesale
Group. ``We are now being singled out because we believe in an open market,
not government control of power generation, and we have offered solutions
that do not jibe with the governor's political agenda. Contrary to the
perception Governor Davis is attempting to promote, we have been focused on
providing solutions that are fair to all parties in California since the
outset of this crisis. In fact, earlier this week we provided the governor's
office with an outline of a series of emergency measures that, if pursued
quickly, could help mitigate the power crisis this summer. We are still
waiting on a response.''

Perkins pointed out many of the steps Reliant Energy has taken to keep the
lights on in California, disputing the accusation of being
``obstructionist'':

Reliant Energy has run its 30-to-50-year-old plants at the highest levels
since their purchase in 1998. In 2000, Reliant nearly doubled the output from
these plants to meet the needs of Californians -- running them at levels far
exceeding the prior owner, Southern California Edison.

Reliant Energy invested $80 million dollars in 2000 alone to upgrade plants
to make sure the most power possible is available during peak times. In
addition, the company improved emissions levels to clean up the environment
and keep costs for emission credits to a minimum.

For the last two years, Reliant has encouraged the Investor Owned Utilities
and the state to invest in long-term contracts to stabilize rates instead of
relying on the spot market. In particular, Reliant Energy offered to sell
power at two cents per kilowatt-hour if the buyer would purchase the natural
gas required to generate the power, ensuring a transparent cost of power.

Reliant Energy has never shut down generation despite the prevalent concerns
that continue to exist over credit issues. In contrast, just last week a
major out-of-state supplier refused to continue to sell to California unless
payment was forthcoming.

Reliant Energy has created an aggressive curtailment plan to encourage
businesses to ``sell back'' power voluntarily to add more power to the
Western power grid. The company has met with many leaders in Western states
to introduce the program, yet California officials will not even engage in a
dialogue on the program.

``We welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues one-on-one with the
governor,'' Perkins said. ``Unfortunately, he has repeatedly refused this
request over the past year. Last week's meeting with generators was the first
time the group was allowed to speak with him directly, and obviously the
purpose of that meeting was political grandstanding.''

Perkins added that the governor's accusations of opposing court orders are
unfounded. ``We have always worked within the law and are proud of our
commitment to keeping the lights on. We have followed all court orders and
worked closely with the FERC and others to cooperate fully with all
investigations. When necessary, we have filed court challenges to orders that
we believe violate our rights -- hardly an illegal action.''

To participate in a telephone press conference tomorrow, Friday May 18 at 11
a.m. PDT, contact Maxine Enciso at 310/444-1303 or Richard Wheatley at
713/207-5881.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Contact:

     For Reliant Energy
     Los Angeles: Maxine Enciso, 310/444-1303
     Media: Richard Wheatley, 713/207-5881


Why not use the actual correlations we have observed over the past 18 months.   Simply calculate forward gas price movement to forward power price movement (Bal 01, 02, 03, etc.)on a curve by curve basis, and you will find gas/power correlations on a forward basis are very high (80+%), at least in the Eastern markets.


Enerfax GOLD
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE? GAS, OIL, LIQUIDS & DERIVATIVES
INFORMATION SOURCE
   Friday, December 28 2001? No. 452
Visit our website at: http://www.enerfaxgold.com/,

PETROLEUM PRICES ???
| Bonny Light      |  $19.95
| Brent            |  $19.77
| Butane           |  $ 0.38
| Fuel Oil #2      |  $ 0.58
| Louisiana        |  $21.16
| Medit.           |  $19.40
| Propane Non-tet  |  $ 0.33
| Propane Wet-tet  |  $ 0.33
| W. Tx Int Cush   |  $20.90
| W. Tx Sour       |  $19.30

| Euro in US equiv |  0.8830
-------------------------------------------------------------
Todays Petro Bulletins
 * Sinopec Group's 2001 Profits Down by a Third
 * Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Says Fluid Catalytic Cracker at Oil
Refinery Near
San Francisco Up and Running Again After Delayed Restart
 * Spending Cuts Combined with Last Year's Record Profits Give Most
Oil Companies Enough Cushion to Weather Low Price-Demand Scenario
Expected for 1st Half of 2002
 * Occidental Petroleum to Idle Texas Chemical Plant Because of
Market Conditions
 * John S Herold CEO Says Upcoming Earnings Releases May Hold Nasty
Surprises; Possibility of Massive Year-End Oil Industry Financial
Write-Downs
 * Kaneb Announces 800,000-Barrel Terminal Acquisition in Portland,
Oregon from ExxonMobil
 * Former President of Congo Republic on Trial in Absentia Charged
with Treason for Allegedly Cheating Nation Out of Millions of Dollars
in Oil Revenues
-------------------------------------------------------------
NYMEX - NY Harbor Heating Oil? ? ? ? ? ?
Month ??High ??Low? ? Last ? Change
JAN 02 0.5880 0.5765 0.5815 -0.0131
FEB 02 0.5900 0.5800 0.5856 -0.0112
MAR 02 0.5870 0.5780 0.5821 -0.0092
APR 02 0.5795 0.5740 0.5756 -0.0082
MAY 02 0.5740 0.5670 0.5691 -0.0067
JUN 02 0.5745 0.5690 0.5701 -0.0062
JUL 02 0.5790 0.5725 0.5751 -0.0062
AUG 02 0.5870 0.5800 0.5816 -0.0062
SEP 02 0.5945 0.5870 0.5896 -0.0062
OCT 02 0.6025 0.5950 0.5981 -0.0062
-------------------------------------------------------------
NYMEX Crude Oil Futures ($ / Barrel)
Month ?Open ?High ??Low ?Last  Change
FEB 02 20.65 21.00 20.33 20.90 -0.37
MAR 02 20.85 21.20 20.85 21.14 -0.31
APR 02 21.03 21.38 20.87 21.24 -0.31
MAY 02 21.15 21.33 21.10 21.34 -0.31
JUN 02 21.25 21.55 21.15 21.40 -0.32
JUL 02 21.35 21.47 21.25 21.41 -0.33
AUG 02 21.32 21.35 21.27 21.44 -0.33
SEP 02 21.50 21.50 21.45 21.47 -0.33
OCT 02 21.83 21.83 21.83 21.83 +0.00
NOV 02 21.86 21.86 21.86 21.86 +0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------
Crude Oil Futures Slip in Profit-Taking

    Crude oil futures for February delivery on the NYMEX slipped
$0.37 to $20.90 per barrel yesterday, but remained near 6-week highs.
Traders attributed the losses to some profit-taking after crude
prices climbed by $1.65 per barrel on Wednesday. Speculation that
OPEC members will keep pumping over their quotas also pressured the
market downward. OPEC is expected to announce its 4th production cut
in a year today. It is expected to cut output by 1.5 million bpd
after receiving pledges from non-member producing countries to lower
exports by a combined total of 462,500 bpd. However, the 10 OPEC
members with quotas exceeded their quotas by 500,000 - 600,000 bpd in
November. Some expect that actual output reductions from OPEC and non-
members will be closer to 1.0  1.2 million bpd, which could be enough
to prevent crude oil inventories from rising. The production cuts are
aimed at lifting prices back into the $22 - $25 range for OPEC's
basket of crudes. The IEA has forecast that world oil demand will
rise next year by 600,000 bpd, about 30% below the demand growth rate
over the last decade. Heating oil futures for January delivery on the
NYMEX fell $0.0131 to $0.5815 per gallon. January gasoline futures on
the NYMEX dipped $0.0086 to $0.5927 per gallon. In London, Brent
crude oil futures for February delivery on the IPE were up $1.01 to
$20.34 per barrel.
-------------------------------------------------------------
????????????????????????Power Traders

If you like tools, wouldn't it be nice to have one that makes you
money??? --Profit from Time2Trade(tm)

????????????????????????Power Analysts

If you like detail, wouldn't it be great to have it all?
--AcuPower - Now with Trader & Analyst Consoles

For a free trial go to http://www.capacitymap.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures
12 Month Strip ?2.7936  -0.2366? ? ? ?
18 Month Strip ?2.9223? ?
| Month | High  |  Low  | Close | Change |
| JAN   | 2.750 | 2.500 | 2.555 | -0.356 |
| FEB   | 2.650 | 2.600 | 2.619 | -0.318 |
| MAR   | 2.810 | 2.550 | 2.630 | -0.287 |
| APR   | 2.770 | 2.560 | 2.630 | -0.242 |
| MAY   | 2.780 | 2.580 | 2.681 | -0.233 |
| JUN   | 2.890 | 2.700 | 2.740 | -0.223 |
| JUL   | 2.930 | 2.770 | 2.788 | -0.215 |
| AUG   | 2.900 | 2.790 | 2.833 | -0.208 |
| SEP   | 2.900 | 2.830 | 2.843 | -0.203 |
| OCT   | 2.930 | 2.870 | 2.878 | -0.193 |
| NOV   | 3.150 | 3.090 | 3.068 | -0.188 |
| DEC   | 3.350 | 3.250 | 3.258 | -0.173 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Releases
Opt in Email has 9 times the response of regular mail and costs less
than
the postage. Have your press or news releases sent to over 50,000
energy
professionals. For More Information
Write Energyreleases@yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Oil Stocks Surge

    Canadian oil stocks surged yesterday morning as investors
welcomed apparent confirmation that OPEC would make its much
predicted production cut today. The Toronto Stock Exchange oil and
natural gas sub-index was up 1.89% at 9,047.34 just before noon. The
jump followed Saudi Arabia's oil minister's statement that OPEC would
announce a production cut of 1.5 million bpd. The Canadian markets
were closed Tuesday and Wednesday for the Christmas holiday. The
TSE's energy group topped the 9,000 level for the first time in more
than a month. Non-OPEC exporters Russia, Mexico, Norway, Oman and
Angola have together agreed to cut crude exports by 462,500 bpd.
-------------------------------------------------------------
??GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI

In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage
risk in real time.
That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when
it may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your
enterprise.

With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office
software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk
and mark-to-market all in real time.

Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -http://www.kwi.com/
Americas: +1-281-681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia
Pacific: +61(0) 2-9976-6111 ?????
-------------------------------------------------------------
IPE-Brent Crude futures (US $/barrel)
Month ?First ?High ?Low ??Sett ?Chg
FEB 02 20.40 20.55 19.98 20.34 +1.01
MAR 02 20.10 20.11 19.62 20.01 +0.89
APR 02 20.05 20.10 19.64 20.01 +0.92
MAY 02 20.11 20.14 19.85 20.06 +0.89
JUN 02 20.21 20.30 19.92 20.16 +0.88
JUL 02 20.31 20.31 20.20 20.26 +0.88
AUG 02 20.32 20.32 20.32 20.32 +0.85
SEP 02 20.39 20.39 20.38 20.38 +0.82
OCT 02 20.44 20.44 20.44 20.44 +0.80
NOV 02 20.48 20.48 20.48 20.48 +0.77
-------------------------------------------------------------
NYMEX-Mont Belvieu Propane
Gas Futures($ / Gallon)
Month ? ?High ??Low ??Last ? Change
JAN 02 0.3395 0.3305 0.3375 -0.0050
FEB 02 0.3450 0.3350 0.3375 -0.0050
MAR 02 0.3450 0.3375 0.3375 -0.0050
APR 02 0.3450 0.3450 0.3450 +0.0000
MAY 02 0.3475 0.3475 0.3475 +0.0000
JUN 02 0.3500 0.3500 0.3500 +0.0000
JUL 02 0.3550 0.3550 0.3550 +0.0000
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Places Express Pipeline on Rating Watch Negative

    Fitch has placed the `A' rating of the $150 million 6.47% senior
secured notes and the `BBB' rating of the $250 million 7.39%
subordinated secured notes issued by Express Pipeline on Rating Watch
Negative. The action reflects the weakened fundamentals of the US
energy market and the resulting impact on the overall credit quality
of the crude shippers. In addition, the financial performance of
Express has been below original projections due to weakened demand in
its targeted regional markets. The Express notes were issued in
February 1998 to finance the construction of the Express Pipeline and
to repay the costs incurred in the acquisition and upgrading of the
Platte pipeline. The ability of Express to service its debt is
largely dependent upon the revenues received from the pipeline
transportation tariffs paid by various crude shippers under
contractual off-take arrangements. Express is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Alberta Energy. The Express Pipeline System consists of
two main segments, the Express and Platte pipelines. The Express
segment is 785 miles long beginning in Hardisty, Alberta and running
to Casper, WY. The Platte segment is 932 miles long beginning in
Casper and extending to Wood River, IL.
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY JOB LISTINGS
Whether you are actively looking for a job, or want to explore
opportunities in the energy industry, go to
http://www.energyjobs.com. At Energyjobs.com, your job hunting is
made easy, convenient and confidential. Conduct your own search or
participate in our Job Match feature, which accurately matches ?your
qualifications, experience and requirements to any new job that
appears, and then sends you an e-mail notification! Best of all,
membership > is FREE. To register and become a member, simply go to
http://www.energyjobs.com/jobseeker_registration_frm.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
IPE - ARA Gas Oil Futures $ / Tonne
Month ??High ??Low ???Sett ?Change
JAN 02 175.25 169.75 174.00 + 7.50
FEB 02 175.75 170.75 175.50 + 8.50
MAR 02 175.75 172.25 175.75 + 8.25
APR 02 176.25 175.25 176.25 + 8.25
MAY 02 177.00 174.00 177.00 + 8.50
JUN 02 178.25 174.50 178.25 + 7.75
JUL 02 179.75 179.75 179.75 + 8.50
AUG 02 181.25 179.75 181.25 + 8.25
SEP 02 183.00 180.00 183.00 + 8.50
OCT 02 184.75 184.75 184.75 + 8.75
-------------------------------------------------------------
NY HARBOR UNLEADED GAS FUTURES
Month? ?High ? Low ???Last ??Change
JAN 02 0.5950 0.5850 0.5927 -0.0086
FEB 02 0.6025 0.5920 0.5982 -0.0085
MAR 02 0.6120 0.6020 0.6080 -0.0080
APR 02 0.6725 0.6625 0.6680 -0.0070
MAY 02 0.6740 0.6670 0.6720 -0.0060
JUN 02 0.6740 0.6690 0.6705 -0.0060
JUL 02 0.6700 0.6520 0.6705 +0.0000
AUG 02 0.6600 0.6600 0.6615 +0.0000
SEP 02 0.6500 0.6500 0.6475 +0.0000
OCT 02 0.6275 0.6275 0.6235 +0.0000
--------------------------------------------------------------
Get familiar with oil-gasoline.com, inc. This web site ranks
among the favorite sites for petroleum company executives.
In 2002, the corporation plans to run an interactive crude
oil model to provide the latest status of world-wide supply
and demand. You will want to bookmark this one!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Nigeria Under Pressure to Comply with New Quotas

   At the OPEC meeting today in Cairo, Nigeria will likely receive
intense pressure to increase compliance with its official OPEC
limits. The cartel is expected to finalize an agreement to cut 1.5
million bpd from output along with almost 500,000 bpd of reductions
from non-OPEC producers at the meeting. The cartels overall
compliance with its self-imposed limits improved in November as the
10 members were 600,000 bpd over their limits. However, according to
its own data, Nigeria pumped 300,000 bpd in excess of its quota,
making it responsible for half the cheating. If OPEC cuts output by
an expected 1.5 million bpd, Nigeria's new quota would be about 1.79
million bpd, necessitating a 400,000 bpd cut, or 22% from its
November volumes. Nigeria's presidential adviser on energy will
takeover as OPEC President on January 1st, making it even more
important that it adhere to the quota. Some cartel members say that
full compliance will be stressed at the meeting because they have
asked non-members to make commitments and it is important for OPEC to
stick to set an example. It is unlikely that OPEC members will reach
full compliance during January. Sales commitments for the month have
already been made and although some members like Saudi Arabia have
flexibility in their contracts others would need to reduce volumes
already sold.
-------------------------------------------------------------
??ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.

*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks

FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.
http://www.fea.com/?cId=14

main phone number:? 1 510-548-6200
email address: info@fea.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL GAS PRICES? ? ?
| Agua Dulce              | 2.49  |
| ANR SE                  | 2.59  |
| Carthage TG             | 2.52  |
| Chicago Citygate        | 2.65  |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore   | 2.60  |
| Dominion South Point    | 2.77  |
| Henry Hub               | 2.63  |
| Houston Ship Channel    | 2.63  |
| Katy Hub                | 2.54  |
| NGPL LA Pool            | 2.55  |
| NGPL - Midcontinent     | 2.47  |
| NGPL STX                | 2.52  |
| NGPL TX/OK              | 2.53  |
| NNG Demarc.             | 2.59  |
| Niagara                 | 2.90  |
| Sonat Tier 1            | 2.59  |
| TCO IPP Pool            | 2.78  |
| Tetco ELa               | 2.59  |
| Tetco M-3               | 3.22  |
| Tetco STX               | 2.53  |
| TGP Zone 0              | 2.52  |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg)    | 2.58  |
| TGT Zone SL             | 2.64  |
| New York Citygate       | 3.38  |
| Transco Station 65      | 2.63  |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY)     | 3.39  |
| Trunk ELa               | 2.55  |
| Western Region
| California Border       | 2.54  |
| El Paso Keystone        | 2.41  |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco | 2.40  |
| Waha Hub                | 2.46  |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig)      | 3.52  |
| Dawn Hub/Union          | 2.84  |
| Northwest Stanfield     | 2.36  |
| Wyoming Pool            | 2.33  |
| Opal/Kern River         | 2.68  |
| PGT-Malin               | 2.49  |
| Sumas                   | 2.42  |
          Flow date 12/28
-------------------------------------------------------------
Crude and Product Stocks Up

   The DOE has reported crude oil inventories rose 2.6 million
barrels from prior period. Gasoline stocks fell 3.3 million barrels
and distillate stocks fell 1.7 million barrels from the prior period.
-------------------------------------------------------------
?Energy Seminars, Inc. Announces Key Seminar Offerings for January:

Energy Seminars will be going to Florida and Calgary in 2002!

Click to www.energyseminars.com to see our 2002 schedule.

Register on-line at http://www.energyseminars.com or call Registrar
Gina Patrick

Phone: 281-362-7979
FAX: 281-296-9922
-------------------------------------------------------------
Russia's Oil Export Plan Leaves Loopholes

    Russia's 1st quarter oil export schedule makes it only appear
that the country will keep a promise to cut 150,000 bpd of exports in
a bid to help OPEC lift sagging crude prices. This week, it set an
export schedule to export 30.9 million tonnes of its own crude and
will ship 3.63 million tonnes of Kazakh and 725,000 tonnes of Azeri
crude in the 1st quarter of next year. Although the schedule looks
like a firm pledge to reduce exports, there is no benchmark figure to
which the schedule could be compared. Russian traders say that the
country's oil firms will seek ways to increase crude exports to the
West because it pays more than domestic consumers. They point out
that while the export schedule includes only volumes moved by the
state pipeline Transneft, over 2 million tonnes per quarter bypass
Transneft. There are many ways to increase officially declared 1st
quarter volumes, for example, by allowing oil companies to export
cargoes not shipped in November and December due to storms. It is
also possible that Russian oil companies will increase oil volumes to
Ukraine and Belarus refineries, where their further shipments will be
hard to track.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Energy Sponsor

Become the Official Sponsor of the Enerfax Publications.? This unique
opportunity is limited to one special company or organization.? For
more information please write
sponsor@enerfax.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
OPEC Expected to Announce Production Cut Today

    OPEC is expected to officially announce its plan to cut up to 1.5
million bpd from exports at a meeting in Cairo today. The output cut
is expected to be effective as of January 1st and last 3-6 months and
is aimed at lifting prices back into the $22 - $25 range for OPECs
basket of crudes. But some members of the cartel appear to be bowing
to the realization that the global economy has weakened by saying
that they believe $20 to $22 is a reasonable level and that $25 is
not a reasonable price. The demand for oil is growing at its slowest
pace since 1984, forcing OPEC and non-aligned producers to cut
supplies. The IEA predicts that oil demand will grow by just 600,000
bpd, which is 30% lower than the average growth over the last decade.
However, many think that OPEC will fail because of the cartels poor
record of compliance to previously instituted reductions. OPEC
members exceeded their quotas by 500,000 - 600,000 bpd in November.
If OPEC does not stick to its self-imposed limits, there is very
little incentive for producers outside the cartel to abide by their
commitments. Some expect that actual output reductions from OPEC and
non-members will be closer to between 1 million and 1.2 million bpd,
which would be just about enough to keep stockpiles from rising.
------------------------------------------------------------
Washington DC
January 24, 2002
Spencer Abraham U.S. Secretary of Energy to address energy community
on
potential security and commerce threats. Also to speak will be key
directors
from the CIA, SPR, IEA, SPR and more. See complete
detail and register today at
http://www.wesc.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 added 97.99 points to 7650.58
The CRB Index lost 1.42 points to 192.07
The US Dollar dropped 0.29 points to 117.49
The Dow advanced 43.17 points to 10131.31
The S&P 500 climbed 7.76 points to 1157.13
The Nasdaq was up 15.72 points to 1976.42
February NYMEX Crude Oil fell 1.65 to 20.90
Canadian-US Exchange added 0.0000 to 1.5935
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please Welcome Our Advertisers by Visiting These Websites!
http://www.fea.com/
http://www.kwi.com/
http://www.capacitymap.com/
http://www.energyseminars.com
http://www.energyjobs.com
Enerfax Gold is the North America's Gas, Oil, Liquids and Derivatives
information source. It is sent to you free of charge. Enerfax Gold
may be copied and redistributed in its entirety to all interested
energy professionals.? Please send us the e-mail addresses of other
energy professionals that would like to be added to Enerfax Gold's
growing distribution list of thousands of energy professionals in the
US and Canada at
subscribegold@enerfax.com
The information contained herein was obtained from sources which
Enerfax Gold believes to be reliable, but does not guarantee its
accuracy.? Your support of our advertisers is greatly appreciated and
will keep Enerfax Gold free. Thank you. Your comments are welcome.?
For information on advertising, please write advertising@enerfax.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Attached are new draft responses to the Frontera Notices of Force Majeure/
Uncpontrollable Forces, for dispatch today if the your desk deems
appropriate.   Please review and comment.  Also please let me know who would
sign these letters for the desk. I will distribute to each of you hard copies
of Frontera's notices.  -David


bobby shiring in the newest member of ees


He's soooooooo mad

Sarah Hlavinka McConnell
Associate General Counsel
Compaq Computer Corporation
MS 110701
20555 SH 249
Houston, TX  77070-2698
Phone (281) 514-4933
Facsimile (281) 518-7501
sarah.mcconnell@compaq.com <mailto:sarah.mcconnell@compaq.com>

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	mcmahahk@WellsFargo.COM [mailto:mcmahahk@WellsFargo.COM]
> Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:40 PM
> To:	McConnell, Sarah
> Subject:	Get Ready.........
>
>
>
> > > http://www.uniontrib.com/news/features/breen/images/cartoonsept13.gif
>
 - att1.eml


I left a packet of information in each of your mail slots containing 3 sheets
of information.  This is information that I managed to find off the WSCC
website containing potentially useful tidbits on the physical side of
things.  The first sheets (the one with color) contains information on Joint
Owned Units (JOU's) and some examples of how to tag specific ones.  The
second sheet contains a few more examples of JOU's.  The third sheet (called
WSCC Scheduler's Course) contains information on specific interties and what
control areas have an interst, as well as some useful notes about the
specific tie.  If you have any question, let me know.

Cheers
Jesse


Chris,  The original transaction agreement were done via fax.  We only have
fax copies. The two amended and restated transaction agreement #2's he sent
on Dec. 21 were inadvertently not executed by Huber.  I sent them back, but
somewhere they got lost in the shuffle.  Let's have him execute the copies
you left with him.
----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 10:28 AM -----

	Mark Whitt@ENRON
	Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
	01/29/2001 11:05 AM

		 To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Huber Contracts

I have forwarded all the agreements I  have to Gerald.  I assume that there
is an original of the Transaction Agreement in Houston.  It was done over the
Fax.
In addition,  Myself and Stephanie need about 15 minutes with you sometime
this week so that we can transition the Capacity Release activity on WIC to
Stephanie.

Mark

	Chris Meyer@ECT
	01/29/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Huber Contracts

Gerald/Mark - I dropped off the Huber contracts as follows:

Trailblazer Assignment and Assumption Agreement - dropped off one original
for execution.  The VP was not there to sign.  We should receive the executed
original back from Huber this week.  Thereafter, all three originals go to
Trailblazer for signature.

Capacity Assignment and Prearranged Release Agreement - gave original to
Brian Stone.

Amended and Restated Transaction Agreement #2 - Brian stated that he mailed
the two "Huber" executed originals to Mark Whitt on 12/21/00.  I left the two
(replacement) unexecuted agreements with him in the event Mark cannot locate
those mailed in December.  Mark - do you have these?  Let me know ASAP.

Enfolio Master Firm Purchase / Sale Agreement - dropped off two originals for
execution (to replace the fax'd version).  Should get back this week.

Original Transaction Agreement - Brian only has a fax'd copy.  He wants to
know if there is an original that exists.  Let me know if we have any
originals or whether the deal was originally done over the fax.

chris
x31666


Tana:
Here is the Enron Guaranty .  It is in my specproj/J Aron file named as Enron
Guaranty FINAl.

Carol