(See attached file: sce comments on Merged Leg.doc)

Here are some comments from SCE in redline form.  I struck out Jeff's and
Barbara's sections.  I'm assuming that Delaney will insert Barbara's
revised version, and Jeff's was duplicative of Dorothy's.  Linda Sherif has
not had a chance to review the changes to the self-gen section.  She and I
discussed a new definition for (a), and her language addresses my concern.
She will be getting that language to you after she reviews with Mike Kahl.
She said she would let me know if Mike revises the language.

I wish there was more time to do a more comprehensive edit.

                    "Delaney
                    Hunter"              To:     "'Barbara Barkovich
(E-mail)'"
                    <dhunter@s-k-        <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'John
White
                    w.com>               (E-mail)'" <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
"'Ann Cohn
                                         (E-mail)'" <cohnap@sce.com>, "'John
Fielder
                    07/08/01             (E-mail)'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "'Gary
                    02:14 PM             Schoonyan (E-mail)'"
<schoongl@sce.com>,
                    Please               "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
                    respond to           <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Dorothy
Rothrock
                    dhunter              (E-mail)'" <drothrock@cmta.net>,
"'Keith
                                         McCrea (E-mail)'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>
                                         cc:     "Linda Sherif (E-mail)"
                                         <lys@a-klaw.com>, "Linda Sherif
(E-mail 2)"
                                         <lysherif@yahoo.com>, "Phil Isenberg
                                         (E-mail)" <isenberg@hmot.com>
                                         Subject:     Merged Leg Document

All-
I have merged everyone's seperate language into one document - this may be
easier to work from today, especially for those of you on the phone.

Talk to you all at 3:00.

Thanks,
Delaney

(See attached file: MERGED LEG LANGUAGE.doc)

 - sce comments on Merged Leg.doc
 - MERGED LEG LANGUAGE.doc


EPSA's california story.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001
03:44 PM ---------------------------

"Illane lewis" <ILewis@epsa.org> on 01/26/2001 03:41:14 PM
To: <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:

 - Updated California The Real Story 1-01.doc


Attached is a draft of the Broker Electronic Transaction Agreement which will
be used to allow Brokers to transact on behalf of their customers.  Please
review the document and give me any comments.  Please pay particuliar
attention to Section 3 Transactions.

Also please note that it will be imperative that broker confirmations are
done each day on Broker Client Transactions to limit the exposure associated
with online transaction broker breakage costs.  The confirmations group will
be responsible for confirming each day and notifying credit immediately of
any discrepancies between Enron and the Broker.   Notification by the
confirmations group will be the only means by which credit will be informed
to shut down broker activity in the case of a transaction that has not been
confirmed and/or verified by the broker.

Thank you


Ryan

Testing the Ivey e-mail forwarding system. If you get this w/b.

Chris Dorland


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 02/15/2000 02:49
PM ---------------------------

"Una Chan" <una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com> on 02/15/2000 02:31:53 PM
Please respond to una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Una L. Chan

Hi Chris,

I thought I would send you my new business vCard and a brief description of
my service offerings. I will be sending out hard copies of my business cards
in a few weeks or if I see you at CERI in Calgary, I can give you one then.

SigmaRisk Analytics is a risk management consulting firm for natural gas,
electricity and oil.  Service offerings include evaluation of physical and
financial strategies, risk evaluation and audits, design and implementation
of risk management programs (Front, Middle and Back Offices), risk
management software evaluation, and educational seminars.

Regards,
Una

Una L. Chan, P.Eng., MBA
Principal
SigmaRisk Analytics
Tel: 604-469-2892
Fax: 604-469-2832
E-mail: una.chan@sigmariskanalytics.com

 - Una L  Chan.vcf


Peter, thanks for the memo.  It would be very helpful to get a memo with public information only that we could share with key business people.   Alternatively, could you indicate what  the confidential information is.

Thanks. Vicki

From:	Peter Del vecchio/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 11/16/2001 08:06 PM
Sent by:	Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate
To:	John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Charles Cheek/ENRON@enronXgate, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Evans/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Labanowski/ENRON@enronXgate, Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen Wallace/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, Sheila Tweed/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey T Hodge/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Cash/Enron@EnronXGate, Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Barbara N Gray/ENRON@enronXgate, Julia Murray/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan Aronowitz/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Henry/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Eickenroht/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Donahue/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark S Muller/ENRON@enronXgate, Molly Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Janet Place/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Peter Del vecchio/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	Memo regarding Enron/Dynegy Agreement and Plan of Merger - Compliance with the Conduct of Business Covenants

Please see the attached memo regarding Enron/Dynegy Agreement and Plan of Merger - Compliance with the Conduct of Business Covenants.

Sent on behalf of Peter del Vecchio
By:  Martha Keesler
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB 3829
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 345-2423
(713) 646-3491 (Fax)


What is it about the two of you that you think I can't handle?  And believe
me I am making efforts to enlist worthy participants.

Wilson Kriegel@ENRON
04/19/2000 02:28 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: night

are you saying it's just the three of us?
which is fine with me..
but i don't know if you can handle Ben and I on a good day


yours?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES on 09/26/2000 02:59
AM ---------------------------

Lisa Yoho
09/25/2000 04:49 PM
To: Mark A Taylor/EFS/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: CFTC Issues

Mark --

Rick Shapiro has asked that I coordinate with you on CFTC issues since I'll
be handling government affairs matters for Enron Global Markets and Enron
Networks.

Would it be possible to meet sometime this week (or early next week) to talk
about this?   I will be in Houston on Thursday and Friday of this week, and
all of next week.   Let me know what works for you.

Looking forward to meeting you.

Lisa


Jason,
After our brief discussion last night I think I should discuss a few of the
issues I have with respect to calculating a VaR on the deal that you are
proposing.  The VaR model, as I illustrated, is set up to accept a term
structure of delta positions, prices and vols and it may be difficult to
translate the 'silver mine' position into these inputs.
I do not think that we can simply take the net silver content of the mine and
then make some assumptions about vol and price. The VaR model
also assumes a certain amount of liquidity in the market and a 1 day holding
period.
To do this properly I would need to understand fully how the deal is priced
as these sensitivities are ultimately what will effect the change in MTM
in the future and that is essentially what VaR is supposed to predict.
If you need me to work on this then you need to contact Steve who will help
to prioritise my time. I will also need to consult with Vince Kaminski and
Tanya Tamarachenko in Houston for advice.
RAC will also assist in the process.
Please contact me if you have any further questions,
Kirstee
x34529


Christie,

Let's meet to discuss this project. I need more information from you about it.
By the way, I shall meet Bob Westbrook on Wednesday to discuss unrelated
issues.

Vince

Christie Patrick
11/02/2000 12:33 AM
To: cmiller@rice.edu, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael B
Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, grwhit@rice.edu, westbro@rice.edu, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Action Learning Project and Enron tour

Hi Carrie,

It was great meeting with you and Dean Whitaker again last Friday, as well as
Mr. Westbrook.
 As we discussed,  I have submitted the Action Learning Program materials to
Vince Kaminski, our managing director of Risk analysis and Corporate
Research.  I'll be following up with him, and his recommendations for project
proposals next week.
  Also, I've discussed with our University Affairs team setting up the
faculty tours--we're ready when you are!!  The sooner the better--I'd love to
get these in pretty immediately, and in any event, before the reception at
the end of the month.  I"ll have Cindy Derecskey in my group eMail you--she
is prepared to set these tours up.

I look forward to continuing to develop the multiple potential dynamics of
the Enron-Rice relationship!

Thanks!

--Christie.

ps:  Thanks so much for the Crystal Rice Owl--my participation as a judge in
the Rice Invitational Case Competition was my pleasure indeed!
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
12:23 AM ---------------------------

Carrie Miller <cmiller@rice.edu> on 11/01/2000 12:47:17 PM
To: christie_patrick@enron.com
cc: grwhit@rice.edu, westbro@rice.edu
Subject: Action Learning Project and Enron tour

Christie,

I enjoyed visiting with you last week at the Jones School.  Thanks for
taking time to come see us.  I wanted to follow up with you regarding the
Action Learning Project program and Enron tour.  We hope to have Enron as
part of the program in 2001.  Please let me know how I can help make this
happen.  I look for the program to be full before the deadline of December
1st.  Also, I am happy to help organize a group to tour Enron.  If you were
to participate in the ALP program, January/February might be a good time to
put something together with key faculty and the ALP team.  Let me know your
thoughts.

Again, many thanks for your continued support of the Jones School.  I look
forward to hearing from you soon.

Carrie

======================================
Carrie Chamberlin Miller
Director of MBA Program
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas 77005-1892
Phone:  (713) 348-5260
Fax:  (713) 348-5251
E-mail:  cmiller@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/


Attached is the document reflecting the changes in the PRC Reps pursuant to
our conversation yesterday afternoon.  Please call if you need any additional
information.
Charlene
3-9233


Hi Reagan,

Sure.  I'm digging out now.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 05:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ozzie Pagan/ENRON@enronXgate, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: FW: FW: Letter of Intent

Kay,

Could you take care of this?

Thanks,

Reagan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Marvin L. Carraway" <mcarraway@watervalley.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marvin+20L+2E+20Carraway+22+20+3Cmcarraway+40watervalley
+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; priest@yazoopsc.org
Subject: Re: FW: Letter of Intent

Reagan, I have a meeting Tuesday and Bob intends to call a special meeting
,but
we need a clean copy of the LOI for the Boards and Bob needs it to go out with
the notice of the special meeting. Thanks MLC

"Rorschach, Reagan" wrote:

> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:         Rorschach, Reagan
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:45 PM
> > To:   Robert Priest (E-mail); Marvin Carroway (E-mail); Marvin
> > Carroway (E-mail 2)
> > Cc:   Mann, Kay; Fairley, David; Nicolay, Christi; Pagan, Ozzie; Will,
> > Lloyd
> > Subject:      Letter of Intent
> >
> > Marvin and Bob,
> >
> > Attached is the most recent version of the LOI.  This version includes
> > revisions resulting from conversations between David Hunt and Kay
> > Mann.  The Beck comments are also included.
> >
> > David Fairley and I will call to follow-up.  In the meantime, feel
> > free to call with any questions.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Reagan Rorschach
> > 713.345.3363
> >
> >
> >  <<LOIMarch19red.doc>>
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                            Name: LOIMarch19red.doc
>    LOIMarch19red.doc       Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                        Encoding: base64
>                     Description: LOIMarch19red.doc


Bill,

Thanks a lot.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bill Cordes @ ENRON                           01/11/2000 08:31 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Congratulations

Congrats on your promotion to MD. I appreciate the work you group is doing
for ET&S, and I know the promotion is well deserved.

    Bill Cordes


ECS is technically part of the bankruptcy filing.  We are looking at our options in case ECS can't perform.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sztroin, David
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 12:26 PM
To:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	Electric Compression

Teb, is Enron Compression Services part of the bankruptcy? Weren't they a part of Enron North America? Will they still serve us power for Station 13?


Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660


Is there a set time when this is supposed to come out monthly?  It seems to
be a hit or miss thing.  The last one I have is dated 7/17, but you all are
executing so many these days that I'm sure it is not nearly complete!!


Raymond,

I shall call you on Sunday after my arrival in Sydney.
Look forward to meeting you again.

I shall be ready to speak on all the topics you mentioned.

Vince

Raymond Yeow@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/09/2000 09:07 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
Subject: Re: Request for suggestions : Vince's visit to sydney in July

Dear Vince,

after getting our heads together here,
we would much apprecaite if you could share the Research Group's latest on
---

- Var ie "... repeat my workshop presentation on value-at-risk..."
 as well as cover additional topics viz.
- Discuss, with application, Enrons internal V@R model, and how this is used
internally.
- Discuss volatility modelling, and whether it is possible to maintain and
trade a term structure of volatility in electricity

- Modelling forward curves with reference to associated markets (eg Oil).
  Can we gain some insights through spreads to related market curves (spark).

I assume your hotel is booked already. Catching the taxi is the best way to
get to your hotel.
Since you are arriving on the weekend , if you need to contact me - my mobile
is 0417-692295, home tel/fax
is 9232-8892

Rgds Raymond

---------------------- Forwarded by Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/07/2000 04:45 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Raymond Yeow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Your visit to sydney in July

Paul, Raymond,

Thanks for your message.
Sorry I did not get in touch  with you earlier. The last few weeks were very
hectic. I am starting
right now my preparations for the presentation I am going to give at the
conference.

Here are the details of my itinerary (I shall send you a copy tomorrow). I
arrive Sunday morning
and leave Saturday morning. The conference takes place on Monday and Tuesday.
On Wednesday, I am making a presentation at the workshop on value-at-risk. I
would
like to stay at the conference for the duration: it's a great learning
opportunity for me.

On Thursday and Friday, as well as in the evenings (except for the evening
of July 18), I am at you disposal.
I would like to take advantage of this trip and learn as much as I can
about the Australian markets and discuss with you the research agenda.
I shall be glad to make several presentation.
I can repeat my workshop presentation on value-at-risk as well as cover
additional
topics.

Vince

Paul Quilkey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/04/2000 05:23 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:
Subject: Your visit to sydney in July

Vince
I support Raymond's email and would welcome the opportunity to have you give
a presentation (formal or informal) to the trading group on latest research
initiatives in Houston.  Please let us know your schedule so that we do not
overly burden you during your visit.  Look forward to seeing you and catching
up over a beer.
Thnx
Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 08:23 AM ---------------------------

Raymond Yeow
07/04/2000 08:21 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kirsty Hogarth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elliott
Katz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Gray/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Your visit to sydney in July

Dear Vince,

Hi !, it's only two weeks until the Aust Energy Risk (17-19 July ) seminar in
Sydney.
Is RISK organising your hotel ?

Otherwise, Kirsty can organise for you,
eg harbour vIew at the Regent or convenience to the seminar location at the
Sheraton ?

We would like to make sure that you have all the necessary "comforts" of home
when you are with us,
Elliott & David can set up a desk for you in the office/trading room with
phone etc
so you can use one of our PC to access email or plug in your laptop.
Please let Elliott or David kmow your requirements.

How long will you be with us ?
Is this your first trip to Sydney ?
There are several of us in the office who would like to take you  for a
meal(s)/ show you the sights etc and
discuss the latest Research findings with you whilst you are in Sydney eg VAR.

Hear from you soon.
Raymond
725pm 4 July


Sorry for the late notice, but is it possible to get together by telephone
tomorrow at around 10:00 a.m. CDT to discuss the upcoming CPUC workshop and
how TW and Enron should be engaged in that process?  Mark, Jeff, we'll
initiate the call here from Houston.


FYI........Call with any questions.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000 04:44 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Jackie Morgan                           08/23/2000 04:37 PM

To: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Expense Contracts

Per your request.  This list has been pulled from Global Contracts but has
not been reviewed.  Please take a look at it and let me know if you need
additional information.  I will  begin printing the attached points by
contract.  I'll give you an update tomorrow a.m.

Jackie
ext  39177


What is your address?? I need to send you an invitation to Bryan's birthday
party.? It will be at our house on May 27th from 8 pm until whenever.

Thanks,

Monica Denney

Nortel Networks

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

ESN??????? 450-9595

v???? 512-418-0095????????????????????????????????????? 8310 N. Capital of
Tx. Hwy.

f????? 305-422-8485????????????????????????????????????? Suite 405

c???? 512-773-0095????????????????????????????????????? Austin, TX 78731


Are you busy?


FYI
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 05:38 PM -----

	Taffy Milligan
	07/20/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: SWAP Periodicals

Per your request,  below is a list of the periodicals that are circulated
through the SWAP group.

Derivatives Week (weekly)
Swaps Monitor (bi-monthly)
Barrels Bars & BTUS (monthly)
Derivatives Report (monthly)
Derivatives Strategy (monthly)
Futures & Derivatives Law Report (monthly)

Let me know if you need anything else.

Taffy

I'm working on the red binder question.  Tana may visit with you to get
details.


Karen attached is the latest status of the power trading track folks.

I will use your template going forward to track changes.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Will, Lloyd; White, Stacey; Baughman, Don; Arora, Harry; Davis, Dana; Herndon, Rogers; Gossett, David; Gaskill, Chris; Superty, Robert; Lagrasta, Fred; McMichael Jr., Ed; Neal, Scott
Subject:	Existing Trading Track Rotations

 << File: trading track rotations.xls >>

Attached is the current list of rotations for the Trading Track participants and future assigned rotations (as decided at the time of hiring).    Can you please re-confirm you have these people in your group currently, as I appear to have conflicting information.  I will re-send, if any changes occur.

If there is any movement of these people between groups can you plese keep me in the loop.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Effective immediately, please use the following URL to access the Wright
Joint Defense Team Extranet site hosted by CaseShare:

http://www.caseshare.com/wright

Using this URL will redirect you to the secure location of your site.
The URL you have been using will continue to work, but could result in
error messages and/or additional login boxes being generated when used.

If you have shortcuts or favorites that contain the old URL, please
update them accordingly to reflect this change.

We apologize for any minor inconvenience this may cause. As always, if
you have questions related to this or any other matter involving
CaseShare, please direct them to support@caseshare.com by email, or call
our support desk at 303-824-0911 between the hours of 7am - 7 pm
Mountain Time.

Thank you,

Gabe

	Gabe Luchetta
	Chief Information Officer
	CaseShare Systems, LLC
	1800 Glenarm Place, Suite 1400
	Denver, CO 80202
	(303) 824-0820
	(303) 293-9073 (fax)
	gluchetta@caseshare.com
	www.caseshare.com


I have changed the Index Multiplier for all of the days in January.  The days
that were not at a mulitplier of 1.05 have been changed to that amount. Also,
there was no deal in for 1/9, and 2 identical deals for 1/10.  I modified one
of the 1/10 days to the 1/9 amount.

I will begin autoscheduling these shortly so the price will show.

C


I'm still waiting for Davis' office to call.  The plan currently is for me to
talk to him when and if he calls.  Sandi has been in touch with the
governor's office.

By the way, thanks for the summary of the California proceedings.  I talked
to Hebert yesterday and he was duly impressed with your remarks ... I had to
remind him that you worked on the right answers for California, not the
abomination that's in place today.

Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/13/2000 06:48 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Skilling Get Davis Straightened Out?


Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'm still learning and it seems
every few minutes we face another computer program meltdown. Following are
the changes for these deals.

459985
PGET

459788
Salt River couldn't take the deal, according to Mike Swerzbin, so we had to
go with Williams.

459789
Changed to PSCO

460001
Prebon is broker

460002
Term is Q1-01

458618
SCEM 25 MW of Mid-C Off Peak for Dec. @ $100
This deal was entered yesterday, according to Mike Swerzbin.

Thanks for your patience,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/15/2000 02:47 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 11-15 discrepancies

Jeff Richter
deal 459985
Check with Richter and see if the counterparty should be Sempra or PGET

Mike Swerzbin
deal 459788
Per Prebon counterparty should be Williams not Salt River.

MIke Swerzbin
deal 459789
Per Amerex cp should be Public Service of Colorado not El Paso

Mike Swerzbin
deal 460001
Amerex does not recognize it.

mike Swerzbon
deal 460002
Per Amerex term should be Q1'01 not Jan'01

Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following Amerex deal:
Buy SCEM 25 mw of MID-C off-peak hrs for DEC' at $100.


Please check on those marked below

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           01/16/2001 11:13 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Possible dinner sites for OU students

Sally,

Here are some places I can check:

Solero  *
Lancaster Grill
Sambuca
Tosca's   *
Post Oak Grill   *
Angelika Cafe & Bar

Let me know if any of these are not an option or if you have any other ideas.

PT


Hello Amy
In a previous mail, you mentioned we could go to the police station
to pick up maps and balloons. I looked in yahoo what was the nearest
station and it says it is in beechnut street. Is it the station you
are talking about or is there another one closer to our area ? If so
would you be kind enough to tell me where it is ? Thanks a lot.
Michel Cahier

In emca@y..., "Amy & Alistair" <barnesfamilyus@p...> wrote:
> you have basically just done it - just send me your phone number
and we are done!
>
> Happy closet cleaning!
>
> Amy
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Chris Collins
>   To: emca@y...
>   Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 12:33 PM
>   Subject: Re: *EMCA* Reminder - Community Garage Sale
>
>
>   Amy,
>
>   I need to sign up for the garage sale. What do I need to do?
>
>   Chris Collins, 906 Bomar.
>
>     emca@y... wrote:
>
>
>
>     We would like to remind you of this upcoming event.
>
>     Community Garage Sale
>
>     Date: Saturday, October 27, 2001
>     Time: 7:00AM - 12:00PM CDT (GMT-05:00)
>
>     Don't forget about the Neartown community garage sale to be held
>     on Saturday, October 27, 7 am to noon.  If you would like to
>     participate, let Amy know ASAP.  Maps of participating houses
>     will be available for $1 at the police substation, and balloons
>     will be provided to mark the houses.  It's a great chance to
>     clean house before the holidays!
>
>
>
>
>
>     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>   Do You Yahoo!?
>   Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


We had a number of conversations today about our daily calls.  Here's what
was agreed:

1. We need to keep the calls brief .

2. We will use the call for discussion of strategy, resource needs and
assignments.  We will use the collective voicemail system and website for
updates on discussions and other events that are germane to the California
crisis.

3. To that end, the following will be our agenda for the daily calls:

Brief legislative report from the Sacramento team.
Discussion of any significant changes re:  political or PR strategy.
Questions on report or strategy.

(The Sacramento Team can exit the call at this point).

Resource needs (fact sheets, analysis, etc.)
Summation--(assignments, etc.)

4. To keep the calls organized and on point, we will also have a chairman for
each call as follows:

Rick (if he is on the call.)
Jim S. (if Rick is not on the call)
Paul K. (if Rick and Jim are not on the call).

Thanks.


Oh, Gabriella (that is such a pretty name!) -

I apologize for not responding.  The conference details have been a bit
confusing to us as we didn't seem to have many.  Mr. Lay is scheduled to
participate in a Ministerial Working Dinner the evening of May 15.  He has to
give a brief report on his forum session from earlier in the afternoon.  It
is being held at the Kleber International Conference Centre.  Therefore, Dr.
and Mrs. Lay will not be able to attend.

Thank you.

Rosalee

Gabriella.GOEKJIAN@oecd.org on 05/10/2001 10:11:44 AM
To: klay@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Dinner at the occasion of the OECD forum 2001

Sorry I had forgotten to put the subject

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GOEKJIAN Gabriella, SGE
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 5:07 PM
> To: 'klay@enron.com'
> Subject:
>
> Dear Mr. Lay,
>
>  I had sent an invitation to you from Mr. Donald J. Johnston and Mrs.
> Heather Johnston to attend a dinner at the occasion of the OECD Forum 2001
> at their residence on Tuesday 15 May at 8.15 p.m.  I hope you will be able
> to join them.  Could you kindly confirm it to me.
>
>  Thank you.
>
>  Yours sincerely,
>
> Gabriella Goekjian
> personal assistant to
> Mr. Donald J. Johnston
>
>
>
>


Information Management Weekly Milestones Report ) 03/02/01

General Project Status.
The evolution of this project continues.

Last week,s IM executive sponsor meeting encouraged the IM Task Force to
consider expanding the task force objectives to include developing a plan and
scope beyond the existing charter.  Plans to gain Business Unit/Functional
Unit support and Jeff Skilling,s support are being considered.

A recommendation was made to use the time between now and 3/15/01 to focus on
developing an HP version of the Enron portal.  It was suggested to invest the
time and effort in evolving the current project plan and scope to ensure
delivery of a portal envisioned in PriceWaterhouse,s HP demonstration.

Portal.
enronanywhere.com is the portal name.

Rick Buy, Rick Causey, and Philippe Bibi viewed PriceWaterhouse,s
demonstration of Hewlitt Packard's benchmark portal.  Each reacted favorably.
We are scheduled to show Cindy Olson and Beth Perlman next week.  Philippe
requested a proposal from PWC.   Further, Philippe requested George Wasaff,
Marie Hejka, and Allan Sommer put together a cost analysis for this
initiative.

The task force is working in with the click@home team.  Suzanne Lim Brown who
is leading the click@home effort is an official IM Task Force member.
Suzanne presented default page and forced information recommendations for
enronanywhere.com.  All task force members are to provide suggestions to
Suzanne for corrections or changes.

Joe Wong,s organization has commissioned some internal graphic artists to
develop some alternate portal &Look and Feels8 for enronanywhere.com.  Per
Philippe Bibi, both enronanywhere.com and click@home should have the same
&Look and Feel8.  This was presented to the click@home team, they are in
agreement.

Portal development work continues by Beth Perlman,s organization.

UDM/ESE.
Inktomi is the Unstructured Data Management/Enterprise Search Engine tool of
choice.

Sue Vasan, the UDM/ESE pilot project coordinator and Business Analyst,
delivered the UDM/ESE inception document.  This document defines the business
and IT objectives for the pilot.

Application and infrastructure support for this pilot has been identified.  A
server has been identified for the pilot.  A more specific use case study to
thoroughly test the feature/functionality of a UDM/ESE tool is being
identified.  Beth Perlman suggested using HR as the case study for the
UDM/ESE tool pilot.  This due diligence will push back the delivery date of
the UDM/ESE pilot.

IM Strategy Proposal.
A strategy to engage BU/FU support and Jeff Skilling,s support is being
planned.  An off-site planning session (e.g. an Accelerated Solutions
Environment) is being considered.  Additionally, whether we build or buy our
benchmark portal is being considered.

Task force members and executive sponsors all agree tools need to be
developed with a strategic focus in mind.


Good luck on the calls everyone.  If Monday doesn't work for the speaker you
call, ask if another day that week works.  Thursday is the second best based
on
parking, etc. On Monday night it looks like the school can't host a dinner
afterwards because of another function.

How is Monday 9/11 at 5 Eastern/2 Pacific to see how we're doing?
Rob <<meeting notes 090700.doc>>

Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com

 - meeting notes 090700.doc


Patience Daniel-Son.... wax on, wax off.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Parks, Joe
Sent:	Monday, May 13, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Mihalik, Trevor
Subject:	Credit

When are we going to get credit established with more counterparties? A lot of red on ICE today.
Thanks
Joe


I am happy for us to paper the deal.  I am not sure that we will be able to guarantee anything special for Scarth in the event of a purchase of the assets -- it will be a deal team decision as to whether they want to impose that requirement on the sale of the asset.  Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Rick
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Palmer, Lizzette
Cc: Cash, Michelle; Jones, Karen E.
Subject: FW: Consulting Services Agreement

Lizette, attached is the consultive service draft that Mike Vlaming @ scarth lyons prepared and submitted. This agreement will be for the REF L.L.C.  This draft represents the compensation and recovery concerns that Scarth Lyons have as a result of the early termination of 2 prior agreements with Enron development spvs. They loose out when Enron flips a deal and the successor terminates.  Please review and let me know your views on the best way to proceed.  Michelle has agreed that this is "just papering up a deal that is already underway".  Once ready, I'll ask Michelle's support for the execution approval and I will let the commercial team know.  Thanks, Rj.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scarthlyons@aol.com [mailto:Scarthlyons@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:05 PM
To: Johnson, Rick
Subject: Consulting Services Agreement

Rick:

Attached is the proposed Consulting Services Agreement incorporating changes as we discussed.  In particular, I have modified the following paragraphs:    (1), (3), (3.b), (3.d), (3.e), (13) and (14.c).

Once you and Michelle have had an opportunity to review this revised Consulting Services Agreement, please contact me to discuss the changes.

Michael J. Vlaming


Dear Jane,
I received your the box of cajun spices yesterday. I will be trying them out
soon.
Hope all is well with you guys, and you made it back with a lot of fun
memories!! I really enjoyed seeing you all!!
Julie, Barb's daughter, has asked me to provide her with e-mail addresses
for the aunts and uncles. Let me know if you're comfortable with me passing
on your e-mail address to her.
Hope to see you sooner!
Frank
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/17/99 02:14
PM ---------------------------

SamChawk@aol.com on 09/17/99 01:49:40 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hi

Sara- I'm disappointed that you described hearing from me as only a "small
pleasure" since I've always heard that size DOES matter. Do you disagree? I
am living in Atlanta ( very calmly as compared to Livin La Vida Loca as you
are. Leica is doing wonderfully and is still a great dog. I still have the
Corky's in New Orleans and 13 Wendy's in Florida with John Casey as my
partner. What kind of new car did you get? I'll show you mine if you'll show
me yours! My Mom is doing fine. Jill has been married for about 3 years,
Richard is doing his residency and getting married in Cleveland next month,
and Karen is a dietician ( those are Beverly's kids, in case you've
forgotten). Bev is dating a guy for several years and Helen is divorced and
living alone ( I hope) in Pensacola. How is your entire family? Why didn't
you invite me to S.America with you? Forget the lame excuse and just invite
me on the next trip-like the usual family trip at year-end!! Call if you can
be nice to me and come visit me or invite me to visit you!   Sam


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mediation Hearing - Mickey Leland Federal Bldg.1919 Smith, 7th Floor

Date:		12/15/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Dear Former TheStreet.com Reader:

Not too long ago, you registered for a free-trial subscription to
TheStreet.com and you provided us with your email address.  Since then,
although your free-trial subscription expired, we have occasionally sent you
promotional emails updating you about changes to our web sites, special
subscription offers or other news.  In addition, we have from time to time
sent you emails containing advertisements from some of our partners.

Your privacy is important to us, so, we would like to give you the
opportunity to let us know if you no longer wish to receive promotional or
advertising emails from us. To stop receiving either of these types of emails
from us, please click here and follow the instructions on the page.

If you would like to review our privacy policy, please click here.

If you would still like to continue receiving these emails, then great!
You don't have to do a thing.

Thank you for your time.

Bernadette Sweeney
Director - Customer Service
TheStreet.com


Dude,

What's your work #.  I need to give you a call.

Kevin


ISDA along with the Ad Hoc Coalition was invited by Senate Agriculture
Committee staff to meet with the Chicago Board of Trade and the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange on Tuesday to discuss a Chicago proposal on legal
certainty and regulatory reform.  I have attached the Chicago proposal for
your review.  This is a confidential document and should not be circulated
beyond our regulatory committee.  I appreciate your sensitivity to this
request.  We will brief you after the meeting either by e-mail or conference
call.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at home
this weekend - 703-256-1719 or at the office on Monday.  -- Many thanks.

 <<Chicago Proposal.doc>>

Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
(202) 457-6545 ph
(202) 457-6315 fax
scarey@isda.org

 - Chicago Proposal.doc


Wes

Can you tell me how many Enron entities are members of the AGA (American Gas
Association).  The fee is 100K and I think HPL is a member and not us.  But I
wonder if some of our other piplelines are members.


Mr. Zaman called Larry yesterday to discuss the most recent offer.

Larry had the opportunity to discuss with Mr. Zaman the sense of urgency on
TW's part and the desire to meet with the decision making body - the NNERTF.
Apparently Mr. Zaman was of the impression that TW would not be pressed to
take legal action until the ROW expired.

Mr. Zaman was encouraged by the TW approach of an incentive but offered no
insights on the acceptability of the offer.  He did promised to review it
with the task force in the near future and indicated that Johnny could expect
a response in the near future regarding the letter and the request for a
meeting.


Tara,

I talked withTodd today, but we still don't have anything firm yet. He
currently intends for his family to return to the U.S. sometime the week of
May 8th with or without him. If that is the case, he himself should be able
to be out before May 15 even if he has to relocate to a hotel. However, he's
asked for another week to get things in order.

We agreed to talk again next Tuesday, April 25, to nail down exact dates. Is
this okay? Are there any constraints that require us to firm this up before
then?

Thanks,
Tom x33926

Tara Rozen
04/17/2000 11:09 AM
To: Tom E Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: SALLY@EXECRELO.DEMON.CO.UK
Subject: Flat!

Hello, its your weekly reminder to let us know when you are moving in so that
we can make arrangments for you!

Please let us know as soon as possible!

Thanks

Tara


Dear Mr. Fujita:

Thank you for you interest in Enron. I shall be honored if you visit Enron
and I shall invite other employees of the company to the meeting.

Please, call my assistant, Shirley Crenshaw (713 853 5290) to discuss the
exact time of your visit. She will be trying to reach you from our end.

The copy right for the book belongs to the RISK magazine. I shall give you
the contact at the company
with whom you can discuss the Japanese version issues.

Sincerely,

Vince Kaminski

Masayuki Fujita <mfujita@mri.co.jp> on 03/31/2000 08:36:00 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc: Eugenio Perez <Eugenio.Perez@enron.com>
Subject: A visit

Professor Vincent Kaminski
Vice President of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Professor Kaminski

    I , Masayuki Fujita was the only Japanese attendee of the Energy
Derivatives seminar
in Houston last December and a member of Japanese consultation firm:
Mitsubishi Research
Institute, Inc. I would be very honored if you can meet with me 17 or 18
April after
attending Energy Trading Summit in 12th-14th. As you know, Japanese
electricity trading is
on the way of deregulation beneficial to the consumers from a long stage of
the nine major
companies' regional monopoly. We are giving a hand to help the Ministry and
industry to
find the right course of them. I and my colleague Yamada, who will attend Risk
Publications Monte Calro seminar in Four Seasons Hotel, would like to visit
you and your
company for studying the sophisticated risk management at Enron. In return,
we may give
you the information about recent institutional progress and major electricity
companies
response in Japan.

    We are now personally translating your book "Managing Energy Price Risk"
second
edition and wondering if you have not given the right to publish in Japanese
and nay give
us the chance to help you introduce modern technology to manage energy risk
in the
Japanese energy industry.

    I do not hope Japanese English power prevent me to pass my sincerity to
you and I can
visit you soon.

    Best regards,

Masayuki Fujita
Principal Financial Engineer
Financial Technologies Section
Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
3-6 Otemachi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 100-8141
Japan
Tel +81-3-3277-0582
Fax +81-3-3277-0521


<title>StoneAge.com - Purchase Request Status</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://www.stoneage.com/common/stylesheets/style.css">

              Hello again patrice thurston,

We need your help!  You used StoneAge.com a while back to request information on a 2001 Chevrolet Tahoe 4dr LS. We sent your request to one of our accredited
              dealers: Davis Chevrolet in Houston, TX.

Let us know what's going on and you could WIN $500! **

Now we want to know if you've bought a car yet, or if there's something more we can do to help you.
				  Your feedback is very important, as it will tell us whether or not we can close this request, and will also help us improve the way we do business in the future.

In addition, you can rate the performance
              of StoneAge.com and our dealerships. Each month we select one customer
              and award them $500 just for responding! After you update your request you are automatically
              entered in the drawing.

                Click
                  here to give us an update **

** To be entered in the $500 drawing, you must submit your update by clicking on the links in this e-mail!  If you reply to this
			message, it will be forwarded directly to a Customer Service representative, and you will not be entered in the $500 drawing.
			Click here or above to update your request (http://www.stoneage.com/survey/index.cfm?quote_id=2410291.

Thank you very much for your feedback and
              for using StoneAge.com!

Sincerely,

Customer Service

			  StoneAge.com

                P.S. If you want to sell
                  your car, list it with StoneAge.com and reach millions of Internet Shoppers!

Click
              here if you do not wish to receive this reminder again.


I spoke with George today about whether Enron would be amenable to discussing settlement with Sempra and putting the facilities to work on a "going forward" basis while continuing the fight over past breaches. George said that we would be interested but this interest was subject to the following general caveats: (1) We would like the facilities moved to one of the sites we are currently trying to get permitted which would be more convenient for us, and (2) we want to renegotiate certain portions of the contracts to reflect today's market situation. For example, the current risk apportionment and price would have to be modified.
	With that in mind, do you have any thoughts about the most effective way to facilitate these discussions?  The last settlement effort was pretty useless and I think we should try to avoid having Holmes and Gittomer sitting opposite from George and Wayne with Goldstein and I in the background looking for cover. What do you think about a mediation or otherwise getting a third party involved? In the alternative, would it be a good idea to involve you and Mel?
	On a slightly related note, I agree that we probably need to get a mitigation letter out but I don't necessarily want to send the one we had been discussing.  Perhaps something that makes clear that they have a continuing duty to mitigate and then discusses getting together to try to resolve things?  Can you take a shot at it and get back to me? Thanks in advance.

From: 	Brownfeld, Gail
Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Mcclellan, George; Gregory A. Markel (E-mail); Mcgowan, Kevin; Reck, Daniel; Arnold, Matthew; Gresham, Wayne
Cc:	Sanders, Richard
Subject:	Sempra Litigation/Conversation with Michael Goldstein

	Michael Goldstein called this morning to discuss the way forward in light of the Rev. Proc. and its recent amendment.  After apologizing for being tardy in returning my calls, he explained that, in his opinion, the tax advice that we received evidences a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation.  First, he stated that he has been advised that the Rev. Proc. does not apply retroactively and that although it requires a new PLR to make changes going forward, it will have no impact on activities which occurred prior to its issuance and, therefore, has no impact on whether synfuel created before the Rev. Proc. qualifies for the tax credit.
	He also noted that, to determine the capacity issue, one needs to look at what could have been produced by the facilities as of the "in- service" date. This level of capacity is the benchmark for what can be produced. According to Goldstein, the level of production at Somerset was well below the capacity on the "in-service" date and, therefore, their proposed modifications to the facilities would not have increased the capacity in any way inconsistent with the intent of the Rev. Proc.  When asked what he believed to be the rated capacity of the facilities on their "in-service" date, Michael didn't know.  He has agreed to find this number and get back to me.
	After I explained my understanding of the effect of the Rev. Proc., Michael kindly suggested that we consider talking to Price Monford (sp?) at VE who he considers to be one of the inner circle of tax experts familiar with Section 29 and the discussions with the Service and the Treasury Department about it.  I told him that we had consulted with our own experts and I didn't know if this fellow was one of them.  He said that he had not talked to Price and had no idea what he would advise.
	Goldstein stated on several occasions that he thought the Rev. Proc. would serve as a great facilitator to get the parties talking again in order to mitigate damages.  He stated further that he was actually looking forward to teeing up the remaining machine at Pier IX and, even, moving the second machine back to Virginia.  When asked what was happening with the machine at Pier IX, he indicated that it remains idle because they can't get a source of coal for it. I told Goldstein that I would visit with the "Coal Guys" about whether there was a way that we could continue to work together in light of everything that has happened.  He said that he didn't think this was going to be a problem since once things were up and running, there wouldn't be much occasion for the parties to have sufficient contact to yield a problem.  I suggested that if there was a way forward, we needed to make sure the parties were on the same page about the Production Test, coal size, etc. and even suggested a modified dispute resolution process should issues arise during the course of performance. I think that Sempra is amenable to an trying to reach an agreement going forward but I expect that absent a mediation or something extraordinary, we will end up fighting about November through the date of any deal going forward. Please note that I made clear that I had no idea whether Enron wanted to have anything to do with Sempra on this deal outside the courthouse but that I would inquire.  I told him my personal view was that, no matter how strong we felt our case was, I would always listen to a settlement plan if they had one.
	Finally, I told him I'd get with you guys and call him later today or tomorrow so that he'd know whether it was worth having any additional discussions. Please give me call when you get a chance.  It might be a good idea to set up a call later this afternoon if you are available.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000 04:31 PM
---------------------------

<butch@watsonmoving.com> on 11/13/2000 08:29:17 PM
To: <DBennyDad@aol.com>, <DBennyDad@aol.com>, <BBURGE@FLASH.NET>,
<KbutchW@aol.com>, <jdaghorn@aol.com>, <Catho928@aol.com>,
<Mrreemus@aol.com>, <murphyg@mercersales.com>, <EGwydir@aol.com>,
<robin99tim@yahoo.com>, <kingb@nuevoenergy.com>, <peggy01@ev1.net>,
<kay_mitchell@hotmail.com>, <sneal@enron.com>, <tdpatton00@yahoo.com>
cc:
Subject: Banner Painting

Dear Wildcat Moms:

We will be painting banners for each of the boys at my house
beginning at 9:00am Wednesday, Nov. 15 - come if you can....

Karen Butcher


Slava,

Mike's phone number:

(713) 553 5883.

Vince


Mark;

I've been working with Brazilian local outside counsel on this EOL matter and
just had a meeting with Remi, David and Ricardo this morning.  For the
purpose of finalizing the legal support (especially the review and
"tropicalization" of the EOL agreements), I have a few questions for you:

What entity owns the EOL site ?
Will there be an agreement entered into between the entity that owns the EOL
site and Enron Comercializadora de Energia Ltda. (and its designated
branches) for the purpose of authorizing Enron Comercializadora de Energia
Ltda. to use the EOL tool in Brazil ?
For the purposes of doing business through the EOL tool, would Enron South
America (and its designated affiliates) or ECE have to enter into the PA and
the ETA with the entity that owns the EOL site ?

Please note that I have only referred to ECE because I am working under the
assumption that, at this point in time, we will only do power deals in
Brazil.  In view of this and for regulatory reasons, the entity buying and
selling power in Brazil must be ECE (the Enron entity authorized by MAE).

Thanks and Regards,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 09/13/2000 10:35 AM
---------------------------

Andrea Bertone
08/15/2000 12:43 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Sami
Arap/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: EnronOnline

Mark:

Implementation of the EOL project in Brazil had been postponed for a while
because of regulatory matters. The Market Rules were still being discussed
and had not been approved by ANEEL, making it impossible for us to implement
EOL, from a regulatory standpoint. Recently (about a couple of weeks ago),
ANEEL issued Resolution 290/00, approving the Market Rules, subject to
certain amendments. The amendments will be implemented in stages over the
course of the next few years. After Resolution 290 was issued and the
regulatory issues were partially resolved, the EOL team decided to work on
the project again. I am now in the course of adapting the ETA, GTC and
Password Application for use in Brazil. I will probably have drafts for
comments within the next 10 days. I am not sure about the time estimate for
completion of the project as a whole. I believe Remi can give you a better
idea of the schedule.

I will forward to you in a separate e-mail the legal opinion that we received
from outside counsel, addressing the issues in the memo prepared by your
team. Also, I take the opportunity to let you know that I am leaving Enron by
the end of August. From September on, the contact people for the EOL project
will be Remi and Ricardo on the commercial side, and Sami Arap on the legal.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact me if I can be of any further
assistance.

Andrea

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 08/14/2000 05:57 PM CDT
To: Andrea Bertone/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: EnronOnline

Any progress on the EnronOnline front?  I'm getting questions from the EOL
team in Houston as to our time estimate to completion and wondered if you had
heard back from outside counsel.


I have attached a copy of a demand letter that may be appropriate in this
situation.  Please let me know if you have any thoughts.


-----Original Message-----
From: Barbara Biehunko  [mailto:b.biehunko@ssss.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:01  AM
To: 'Anja'; 'Bebe (at work)'; 'Benita'; 'Bobbie'; 'Ginger (work)';  'Pamela'; 'Roy Thomas'; 'Shelley (work)'; 'Susie (at work)'
Cc:  'Nikki'
Subject: FW: Fw: NICE PERSON

Barbara
   ;
-----Original Message-----
From: nikki morrison  [mailto:hibiscusgirl19@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001  8:15 PM
To: carmen_derrick@hotmail.com; tcinprogress@yahoo.com;  dwaltz7024@aol.com; innocent_twin81@yahoo.com; KennyandJori@aol.com;  Julie.Johnson@enron.com; b.biehunko@ssss.com; mariposachic@hotmail.com;  dweger@bak.rr.com; missayou@aol.com; mtblees@hawaii.rr.com;  dooziesusie3@aol.com
Subject: Fwd: Fw: NICE  PERSON
>From: "Matthew Blees"
>To: "Nikki" , "Montana"  , "James" , "Nohea"  , "Sasha" , "Leighann"  , "Jesse"
>Subject: Fw: NICE PERSON
>Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:49:48 -1000
> >
> > << NICE PERSON
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> Hello there nice person
> >
> > > > > >> Did anyone ever tell you,
> >
> > > > > >> Just how special you are
> >
> > > > > >> The light that you emit
> >
> > > > > >> Might even light a star
> >
> > > > > >> Did anyone ever tell you
> >
> > > > > >> How important you make others feel.
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> Somebody out there is smiling
> >
> > > > > >> About love that is so real
> >
> > > > > >> Did anyone ever tell you
> >
> > > > > >> Many times, when they were sad
> >
> > > > > >> Your e-mail made them smile a bit
> >
> > > > > >> In fact it made them glad
> >
> > > > > >> For the time you spend sending  things
> >
> > > > > >> And sharing whatever you find
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> There are no words to thank you
> >
> > > > > >> But somebody, thinks you're fine
> >
> > > > > >> Did anyone ever tell you
> >
> > > > > >> Just how much they love you
> >
> > > > > >> Well, my dearest "online" friend
> >
> > > > > >> Today I am telling you
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> I hope I get this back, I believe  that
> >
> > >             without  a  Friend you are missing out on a  lot!!!
> >
> > > > > >> Don't be confused by friends and
> >
> > > > >      acquaintances,  there is a difference!
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> Because I care about you,
> >
> > > > > >>It's national care week. . .and you  get to send
> >
> > > > > >> messages to all your friends  telling them
> >
> > > > > >> that you care about them and make
> >
> > > > > >> them feel good about themselves and  if
> >
> > > > > >> they write back. . .(just once)  then that
> >
> > > > > >> means that they care about you too.
> >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> BUT, you have to send it right  now!! And
> >
> > > > > >> don't just send it back, send it on  to  everyone..
> > > >
> > > > > >>
> >
> > > > > >> Have a nice day, and I'm glad we  are friends!!!


Enron Methanol nominates the following natural gas requirements for the
Methanol Plant for November 2000:

38,000 mmbtu per day

EGPFC nominates the following natural gas requirements for the MTBE Plant at
Morgan's Point for November 2000:

10,000 mmbtu per day


Per your request.

Is the contract supposed to be an off balance sheet contract?  I'm supposed
to be working on the changes necessary to make this one 97-10 compliant, but
I haven't done it yet.  Maybe you will beat me to it, which is fine by me.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 12:00
PM ---------------------------

John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com on 10/09/2000 05:41:13 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Form contract plus exhibits, per request
---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 10/09/2000 05:40 PM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg
09/21/2000 01:57 PM

To:   Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G
      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto
      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K
      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie
      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christen
it officially "FORM 2000 - Rev. 00",clean and compared. John R will need to
take this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisis
applications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as "Form 2000" I
woanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuning
from  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resoluton
materials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.
Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty up
format and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it next
time.

You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was to
revise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibits
withbaited breath.

Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.

Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me.

(See attached file: ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc)

(See attached file: ENRON EPC - 0921 REV0-1 CMP.DOC)

 - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc
 - ENRON EPC - 0921 REV0-1 CMP.DOC


Start Date: 3/9/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030919.txt


Ken

Further to my voice-mail and the notes below, my view is that an effective
Chinese Wall would obviate the need to check on whether we are holding
confidential info on a reference entity, but we'd appreciate your advice on
this.  I suspect Bryan wants to be personally protected against insider
dealing allegations which could otherwise arise, but please confirm.

Thanks

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 07/03/2000 18:54
---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor on 07/03/2000 12:13 CST
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Credit

Any idea what Bryan plans to gain this way?  It's not clear to me that a hard
wall solves our problems with RE approvals but that's because I don't know.
Maybe Ken can shed some light on this.

Paul Simons
03/07/2000 08:01 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit

FYI, there apppears to have been a sea change in Bryan's attitude to having a
hard Chinese wall for his trans-atlantic credit trading group.  In short, he
wants to be behind one and apparently John Sherriff is comfortable with
this.  I have therefore asked Ken Raisler to advise us on how to construct a
Chinese Wall from a practicle, US perspective, with the intention of having
Sanjev at Slaughters modify the "instruction kit", as necessary, to work
under English law.  Given Ken's involvement on equity trading, he appears to
be the right place to start.  There remains the possibility that when the
traders see the procedures they will change their minds and wish to stick
with the existing procedures you have seen.

This will not impact launch of credit trading online which, as advised, is
still set for tomorrow.

Please let me have any thoughts on this.

Regards

Paul


mara,

could you put these volumes into a spread sheet and come up with a daily average?  Remember these are in therms so you need to take off one digit.  Let me know if you have any questions.  We need to get this done so that we can get a price to Portland my this afternoon.

thanks,

Kim


TSWG Meeting notes for 8/23/00

Participants:
Scheduling Coordinators - Altra, SCE, CDWR, PGE, Riverside, Southern,
Midway, Dynegy, PX, Reliant, NCPA, & more.
ISO - Darren Lamb, Ginger Seitles, Greg Ford, Eddie Ledesma, Mark Rothleder,
CP Ng, Jim Blatchford.

Settlement Dispute System (SDS):

Not implemented yet.

Automated Dispatch System (ADS):

The ADS Query File Data Dictionary was released this week. ADS client 26 was
released 8/23. Features include Query data which now contain decimals
instead of integer values and system performance improvement by limiting
queries to 7 days worth of data at a time. A question was raised about what
time standard is used for instructions. Greg Ford responded it is PDT/PST.

RMR Scheduling:

No comments

10-Minute Settlement:

The API parser had corrections made. The Ex-Post price fix (looking for 6
values instead of 1) has been implemented and is working. Also the
supplemental energy import parsing order was corrected. The Beep_Gen_Full
template does successfully parse through the existing parser. Ginger Seitles
is working with SCE to correct the localized parser problem. The question
was raised if there may be only one record supporting two charge types. CP
responded that for CTs 401/407 there is, and can be, one record supporting
multiple charge types. A question was raised concerning instructions being
over lapped to the next day. Mark responded that there are no instructions
that are issued to last over a day. Mark also reminded everyone that
effective June 1st that the ISO stated using ramping energy versus block
energy for dispatches. He also reminded all that residual energy would be in
effect on September 1st.  The PX asked if there were DC loss calculation
available for the market simulation information. CP stated that there was
and would forward it on to the PX. It is also planned to publish the
implementation schedule the week of 8/28.

InterSC Trades of Adjustment Bids:

The implementation target date for Inter-SC Trade Adjustment Bid has been
delayed until the first week of October 1, 2000. A new schedule has been
published. A training class has been tentatively scheduled for September
19th . Details to follow.

OASIS Redesign:

Darren Lamb explained that the project is progressing satisfactorily. He is
still anticipating a market testing in late October with full implementation
in mid-December. A concerned was raised about the amount of time, if any was
being allotted for overlapping of templates.

Dual Invoicing:

Everyone was reminded that the first preliminary invoices were coming out
8/24.

Other:

A request was made (after the TSWG call) to change the time of the call to
1330 PDT to accommodate those in the Eastern Time zone.  Comments are
requested.

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


Dear 1-800-FLOWERS.COM Customer,

Great news! The official 1-800-FLOWERS.COM newsletter, News In Bloom, has a
whole new look just in time for the 2000 holiday season! Celebrate with us
and get the scoop on special holiday offers, seasonal decorating tips,
recipes, gift ideas, and more! So "click" on in and see for yourself what all
the excitement is about!
http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/x_e.asp?r=dec00w&g=about/nib.asp

Happy Holidays!

Your Friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COMsm

You received this email because you are a 1-800-FLOWERS.COM customer. If you
would no longer like to receive our promotional email offers, please send an
email to remove@1800flowers.com from the email address you would like
removed. If you have additional email addresses on file with us you must send
email from those addresses as well or you will continue to receive emails at
those addresses. Please do not reply to this message. Due to timing issues,
you may potentially receive a future message before your unsubscribe request
is implemented.

For questions about an order or any other issues, please email us at
custservice@1800flowers.com

The 1-800-FLOWERS.COM privacy policy is available online at
http://www.1800flowers.com/flowers/security/index.asp#privacy


SALES AGT: MP/YEO5IM

                                          WARD/KIM
                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          3WTC 0306
  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  DEC 19 2000

CAR                   19DEC NATIONAL               HOUSTON TX
                      22DEC CONFIRMATION: 809541373COUNT
                            TELEPHONE: (281) 443-8850
                            FAX: (281) 821-6944
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD40.25DY-UNL MI
                            RATE QUOTED DROP CHARGE: USD0.00
.00
                            BASE RATE: *ZL*USD120.75 BR-3DY
                            PICK-UP: HOUSTON INTERCONTINENTAL ARPT,
                            HOUSTON
                            DROP-OFF: HOBBY AIRPORT

WARD/KIM  S5C0413R1059

ASSISTANT: DANA CAMPBELL 503 464-3901
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSIS ANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 ( OLLECT)
*********************************************


What time works for you guys?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Meet w/ Belden

Yeah, general catch up - no big deal.  We can do it anytime.

RH

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: Meet w/ Belden

I need to leave at 3:30 today to go to my stepson's football game.   Unfortunately, I have a 2:00 and 3:00 meeting already.   Is this just a general catch-up discussion?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:42 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Meet w/ Belden

Kevin -

Instead of our weekly update meeting, would you like to meet with Belden at 4:00 in your office?

RH


You're a machine!

	Marcus Nettelton@ENRON
	03/22/2001 05:38 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 03-22-01

Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/22/2001 05:34 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-22-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 05:34 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 05:31 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-22-01

Please see attached.


Had quite a time re-doing the PSCo charges due to several months being re-billed on their invoices.  Call if you want me to explain what we did.
-Craig W. Lipke
Citizens Energy Supply
Phone (928) 226-2243
Fax     (928) 226-2168
Cell     (520) 699-3683
 <<Enron0106.XLS>>
 - Enron0106.XLS


I think you also need to consider having someone contact R. J. Rudden about Steve Garwood's statements concerning the large RTOs jeopardizing reliability.  His statement was really amateurish.  Rudden's web page (www.rjrudden.com) <http://www.rjrudden.com)> includes a list of clients, including the following that should be concerned: Calpine, Enron, ISO NE, Midwest ISO, NY ISO, PJM, Southern Energy, and U.S. Gen.

Concerning Christi's question on whether we need a computer group looking at the question of redundancy of systems, I don't think we need it at this point.  It is a given that a complete backup system for all commercial aspects of the systems will be required, along with a handoff protocol for emergency control over all transmission operational aspects of the systems.  The specifics of these need to be decided when the hierarchy of each RTO is determined.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Thu 9/27/2001 9:15 AM
To: Rodriquez, Andy; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Shelk, John; Yeung, Charles; Ingersoll, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Alvarez, Ray; Roan, Michael; Maurer, Luiz; Connor, Joe; Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Perrino, Dave; Staines, Dan; Fromer, Howard; Allegretti, Daniel; Hoatson, Tom; Twiggs, Thane; Shortridge, Pat
Cc:
Subject: RE: NERC Statements on Impact of Security Threats on RTOs

Having watched the whole string of e-mails on this issue, I fully agree with Andy's observations and those of others who have made similar statements. In response to Andy's(and Dave Perrino's) question as to whether we respond to the BS of NERC, absolutely..We should call them on this shameless use of an American tragedy...we should correct them on the facts and use this as an opportunity to highlight their inexcusable and baseless  manipulation of the WTC tragedy. NERC ought to be ashamed of itself.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rodriquez, Andy
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:17 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson,
Linda; Shelk, John; Yeung, Charles; Ingersoll, Richard; Novosel, Sarah;
Fulton, Donna; Alvarez, Ray; Roan, Michael; Maurer, Luiz; Connor, Joe;
Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Perrino, Dave; Staines, Dan; Fromer,
Howard; Allegretti, Daniel; Hoatson, Tom; Twiggs, Thane; Shortridge, Pat
Subject: RE: NERC Statements on Impact of Security Threats on RTOs

Christi,

This is probably one of the stupidest things I have ever heard.  NERC is about as secure as a convenience store at two in the morning.  They have almost no experience dealing with security, either cyber or otherwise. They are using the terrorist attacks on the 11th as a reason to blow the dust off all their old Y2K contingency plans and cash in on people's fears to strengthen their position.

In any case, I would suspect that a large RTO with a significant budget is much more likely to be secure than a dues based NERC. Look at NERC's offices.  They are in a shopping mall.  How secure is that?  Last time I visited, they didn't even have any sort of identity cards or badge system or anything - the whole place was wide open.  Anyone could walk in off the street and shut down a large portion of NERC's infrastructure by just randomly unplugging computers.

Contrast that with places like ISO-NE and NY-ISO, who have significant levels of security in their systems that are extremely sophisticated and complex. Or compare that with the MISO's hardened facility, capable of withstanding an F-4 tornado hit.  You tell me whether NERC or RTOs are going to be more secure.

Dave is right on with his classification of the idea of NIMDA being an attack on the electric utility industry as preposterous.  That's akin to saying that a chain letter is an attack on the banking industry because bank statements come in the mail.  And Dan points out a more valid thing to consider - a terrorist isn't going to attack a tariff desk, market system, or security coordinator; they will attack nuclear units, substations, and other installations that actually matter.

I echo Dave's question - do we want to "call" NERC on this issue?  It would be a very simple exercise to point to NERC's many security failings, including some initiatives they are currently sitting on.  Bringing up the right details in the right forums could really undermine their reputation and nip this positioning in the bud.

(By the way - am I the only one who got a kick out of that article pointing out this 3rd grade cleverness of "NIMDA is ADMIN spelled backwards"?  Gotta love journalists - always trying to find an angle.  Next they'll say that the 60 in "2600" refers to the frequency of the interconnection!)

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:11 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Shelk, John;
Yeung, Charles; Ingersoll, Richard; Rodriquez, Andy; Novosel, Sarah;
Fulton, Donna; Alvarez, Ray; Roan, Michael; Maurer, Luiz; Connor, Joe;
Walton, Steve; Comnes, Alan; Perrino, Dave; Staines, Dan; Fromer,
Howard; Allegretti, Daniel; Hoatson, Tom; Twiggs, Thane; Shortridge, Pat
Subject: FW: NERC Statements on Impact of Security Threats on RTOs

Our NERC folks should be able to shed more light on why NERC is making statements that on their face look anti-large RTO (the other emails and comments in these document look more like "this should be reviewed".)

Do we (and other market participants) need to have a computer systems group perform a study that includes redunancy issues, etc. to counter this?  Certainly, Pat Wood and Nora Brownell's testimony to Congress indicate that they believe that large RTOs will bring more security and reliability (we have included this in our SE RTO mediation comments.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Reddy [<mailto:Mreddy@epsa.org>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:09 PM
To: acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Yeung,
Charles; Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe,
Joe; Shelk, John; Jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda;
Alvarez, Ray; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg,
Susan; Hoatson, Tom
Subject: NERC Statements on Impact of Security Threats on RTOs

MEMORANDUM

TO: Legislative Affairs Committee
       Regulatory Affairs Committee
       NAERO Working Group

FROM: Scott Weiner, Legislative Affairs Committee Chair
             Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
             Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
             Donn Salvosa, Manager of Government Affairs

DATE: September 25, 2001

RE: NERC Statements on Impact of Security Threats on RTOs

The attached e-mail in Microsoft Word form contains statements that NERC made during a recent meeting with members of the national press.  The statements concern NERC's view of the implications of terrorist threats for FERC's " Four RTO policy" set forth in its July 12th Order.  The statements also may bear upon the effort to establish a new standards setting organization, particularly the possibility that NERC's responsibilities could be shifted to EISB.  Also attached is an article containing the views of R.J. Rudden Associates, Inc. that discusses the risks associated with centralizing control center operations.

Specifically, NERC representatives informed the press that on September 11 "the grid was the target of an insidious cyber attack that shut down some facilities...from an information administration standpoint."  They noted that this resulted in service denials, although it is not clear whether they indicated where or how much.  This event was attributed to the so-called "NIMBA virus".

NERC's statements suggest a new strategy to preserve the role they've played not only in security matters, but possibly other aspects pertaining to "reliability standards."  They warn against any immediate transition to fewer RTOs as envisioned in FERC's July 12th Order.  Moreover, it is likely that NERC will argue that, given its expertise and experience, recent events make transitioning to a new standards organization (EISB?) ill advised.

It is unclear what, if any, impact all this may have on RTO development, the legislative effort to establish a new reliability standards body or the NERC Board's consideration of pending reform proposals at its October meeting.  However, we can expect security related issues to be included in future discussions of these matters.

Please provide your reactions to the NERC statements to Mark Bennett at 202-628-8200 or mbennett@epsa.org


With Ken Lay's resignation, you undoubtedly have questions about Enron's management structure and what lies ahead for the company.  The purpose of this communication is to begin to answer those questions and lay out the direction we plan to follow as we regroup and rebuild.

First, the Creditors Committee has proposed that the Board of Directors retain an interim CEO to focus on the restructuring process.  This is a positive sign that the Committee believes Enron will provide greater value as a viable ongoing business.

The Enron Board of Directors has approved Stephen Cooper as interim CEO and chief restructuring officer.  Steve is the managing partner of Zolfo Cooper, a corporate recovery and crisis management firm with more than 30 years experience leading companies through operational and financial reorganizations.

Steve and his firm will work with members of Enron's current management to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to restructure the company and emerge from bankruptcy.

As you know, Enron has entered into an agreement with UBS Warburg for the sale of NetCo, Enron's wholesale gas and power trading organization.  In preparation for the transition of NetCo to UBS, Greg Whalley has resigned as president and COO of Enron to assume a position with UBS Warburg.  We want to thank Greg and the NetCo employees joining UBS for their contributions to Enron and wish them great success going forward.

In addition to engaging Steve, Enron has formed an Office of the Chief Executive.  I will join Steve in that office as president and chief operating officer, and Ray Bowen will join us as executive vice president and chief financial officer.

We will provide additional information regarding the roles and responsibilities of Enron's entire management team once those become more fully defined.

Thank you for continuing to support Enron by performing your job everyday.  The ongoing uncertainty about our future, coupled with the constant media scrutiny, makes this situation difficult for all of us. While no one can control the media, we can and will define our leadership and devise our strategy for moving ahead.  And in doing so, we will build a more certain future for our company and our employees.

Link to the press release: http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/2002/ene/012902Release.html


Attached is the PMA log, as of April 2001 accounting. Errol, let me know if you would be interested in setting up a meeting with financial settlements concerning the PG book.

Thanks!
Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com <mailto:Shannon.McPearson@enron.com>


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   April 3, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   EnergyOne Ventures, L.P.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange, Weather,
          Pulp, Lumber & Paper,

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   New York

Copies will be distributed.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


I haven't sent a quote in quite some time, but this one really spoke to me.

Wit makes its own welcome, and levels all distinctions. No dignity, no
learning, no force of character, can make any stand against good wit. -Ralph
Waldo Emerson (1803-1882)


Attached for your review and comment are additional draft responses to ALJ
Biren's discovery request.? Please forward your comments to me as soon as is
possible.? The draft responses focus primarily on retail issues and those
issues impacting SDG&E.? I can be reached in SFO if you need to speak with me
directly at 415 202-9986.? I will be forwarding the remaining responses for
your review and comment shortly.

 <<ALJQRetailSDGE.doc>>

 - ALJQRetailSDGE.doc


The attached PDF file has been posted to the NYISO web site.

Regards,
Bob Boyle

(See attached file: deficiency_pricing_052201.pdf)
 - deficiency_pricing_052201.pdf


Where are the wharton analysts?

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/17/2000 08:52 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

I will schedule you for Nov. 11th.  If you are around on Dec. 9th we will use
you but I will also make sure we have someone else.  We don't generally do a
spring Super Saturday.  We ask the teams to bring back their best two or
three candidates and then we get together informally to decide.  I will let
you know when that begins to take place.  I would like to get a small group
of commercial people for that process as we did with the summer offer
process.    It generally takes place in February and March.
I will keep you informed.
Thanks Charlene

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
10/17/2000 08:44 AM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

Nov 11 is great, and I'll try to help out Dec 9.  (I'll be out of town Nov
4).  I'd also be happy to look now at the spring schedule.

Jeff

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/17/2000 08:32 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Kuehl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

Jeff thanks alot.  I really appreciate it.  Here are the schedule of schools:

November4th (Analysts)
Rice, UT, Baylor, Texas A&M, OU, Florida, LSU and Univ. of Houston

November 11th (Associates)
Columbia, NYU Stern, UCLA, UVA (Darden), Cornell and Vanderbilt

December 9th
Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules from previous Super Saturdays

If you don't have a preference. I would prefer that you do either November
4th or 11th.  I think that would be most beneficial.  You are certainly
welcome to do both but I didn't want to push my luck (smile). Please let me
know as soon as possible so that I can get someone else for the ones you
can't attend.

Again, thanks alot.
Charlene

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
10/17/2000 08:02 AM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Super Saturday Participation

Glad to help.  Can you get me the schedule as to which schools will be here
on those dates.

Jeff

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/16/2000 02:46 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Kuehl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Super Saturday Participation

Jeff,
To ensure that the business units are involved in the recruiting of top
quality candidates I am requesting your assistance in the Super Saturday that
is scheduled for either Saturday, November 4th, November 11th or December
9th.  We would like for you to participate as follows:

Be the speaker at breakfast
Interview candidates
Facilitate the decision making meeting

The breakfast is from 7:30 AM until 8:30 AM.  The speech would begin at
approximately 8:00 AM and need not be more than 15 to 20 minutes.  You would
interview approximately 4-6 candidates.  A vital part of the process is
determining which candidates will receive offers to join the Program.  We
would like for you to facilitate the decision making meeting.  The meeting
will be held in 5C2 beginning at 1:30 PM. and conclude by 3:30 PM.  We will
provide the administrative assistance.
Your assistance and input would be greatly appreciated.  Please let me know
as soon as possible of your availability.
Thanks in advance.

By the way thanks for the help you have provided with Penn at both the
graduate and undergraduate level.  It is very much appreciated.

Charlene


Winter 98-99,not 97-98.
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 12/03/99 10:17
AM ---------------------------

Janet H Wallis
12/02/99 11:43 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory L
Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENTEX AUDIT

Dan, please be aware that the Texas Desk would like to Audit Entex beginning
4/1/99 for a one year term.   The actuals for 3/30/00 should be in no later
then May 1, 00.  Tom  Martin would also like to Audit the Winter 97-98.

What is the first step? Do we need to notify them in writing? Please advise.

Thanks,

Janet


There is a volume discrepancy for deal # 117853/YK6095.1 as reported in Sitara and TAGG.  Please take a look at this deal.
Also, is anybody working on a special contract for this deal as it is a 2-year deal attached to a GTC.

Thanks for your help,

Ann
Ext. 53136


Lisa-

  I will be out at an appointment this afternoon.  I know we spoke a bit this morning; can you sit with Jenny Thome this afternoon and go over the following:

  1. How scheduling works
  2. How to access the scheduling spreadsheets (please give her the path to the sheets)
  3. A list of what tie points are under which spreadsheet
  4. How to navigate her way thru to find purchases, sales, and transmission

 and anything else you come across.

  Thanks,

  Virginia


This deal has been changed from Pinnacle West to Arizona Public Service Co.

Thanks,
Kate


What have they done for us?

	Terence H Thorn@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/03/2000 08:30 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: AGA

Steve I need your help. Twice in the last three months I have run into the
Chairman of AGA who has taken my head off for Enron not renewing its AGA
dues. I understand that the dues had been paid by  Stan Horton who had
decided that the pipeline group with INGAA representing it had no need for
and received no benefit from the membership. I guess a few years back, when
AGA "kicked" the pipelines out, they renegotiated the dues into some type of
sub membership for around 85K.

AGA approached the gas marketing team and talked to Mike Roberts about
renewing the membership and maintaining relations with his customers and
later to Jeff Shankman who passed them off to some other person and never got
back to them as promised.  This is a heads up to tell you that Bob Catell of
Brooklyn Union fame- one of Enron's oldest customers and friends will be
calling Lay.

It seems to me that pro rating the dues among ENA and EGM and maybe GPG might
be a solution. Anyhow, I promised to pass on the complaint. Thanks.


This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

As  discussed.
 - 003680684.DOC