FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES on 04/23/2001 02:29
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  EES Distribution                           04/23/2001 01:29 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: All EES
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

Consistent with the floor talks of a couple weeks ago, we are following up
with an e-mail describing the latest changes in our risk and back-office
functions that are now complete.  EES,s Risk Management and the vast majority
of EES,s Risk Controls and Operations Group will become a new group in Enron
Wholesale Services. This group,s sole function will be to provide pricing,
structuring, commodity risk management, logistics and back-office services
for EES.  Both Don Black and Wanda Curry will report to the EWS Office of the
Chairman.

This change was driven by the explosive growth of EES and the resulting need
to tap the systems, resources and risk expertise of the wholesale groups in
order to continue to grow and take advantage of current market
opportunities.  This change will allow us to more quickly capture the
benefits of scale, process, and technology in risk, logistics and back-office
functions from the larger Enron capability.  As discussed at the All Employee
Meeting in March, these are important objectives, and this change allows us
to reach those goals more quickly.

Specifically, the following groups within the former EES Risk Management
Group, will become a part of this new group reporting to Don Black:

- the gas, power and tariff desks,
- the options desk,
- the site profiles and consumption desks, and
- the matrix products/secondary products desks.

The DSM Group and IAM, along with its execution capability, will remain in
EES and report to the EES Office of the Chairman. We are pleased to announce
that Ozzie Pagan has agreed to lead this function.  Ozzie is an established
commercial dealmaker in ENA.  He has experience in power trading, origination
and plant development. In addition, the Services Group, which will provide
billing, information and other retail services, led by Evan Hughes, will
remain in EES and report to the EES OOC.  All support functions, within the
former EES Risk Controls and Operations Group, that currently support the DSM
and the Services Groups, will remain in EES.  The remaining parts of the Risk
Controls and Operations Group will become part of EWS reporting to Wanda
Curry.  As part of this change, we are pleased to add Evan Hughes and Ozzie
Pagan to the EES Operating Committee.

In addition, the Structuring Group, led by Sean Holmes, will be re-named Deal
Management.  The vision for this group remains the same as that discussed at
the All Employee Meeting; however, it will also facilitate and ensure
productive transaction interaction between EES and EWS.

We have asked, Marty Sunde, as part of his Vice Chairman role, to resource
and lead a formal Restructuring Group to enhance or protect value in several
key transactions in our portfolio primarily in  California.

The newly created IT function, led by Anthony Dayao, will continue to report
into the EES OOC but will support both EES and EWS IT requirements.

Other than these changes, the organizational structure, vision and objectives
detailed out for EES at the All-Employee Meeting in March remain.  We need to
continue to understand and drive deeper into our markets, manage our client
relationships, mine our portfolio, build new products and execute on our
opportunities.

Thanks for all your hard work.  With your help we will become the Worlds
Leading Energy Retailer and Enron,s Leading Division.  If you have any
questions please do not hesitate to ask


After speaking with Danny Conner, I have created deal 606396 to cover this
meter for the next year.

D

Michael Olsen@ENRON
02/05/2001 03:06 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: meter 986315

For Dec. and Jan. production there are flow volumes without a deal.  Deal
502952 was good for November.  Do you want to extend this deal or should
there be another counterparty added?

Thanks.


I'm sad (sniff...sniff...sniff...)...
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 04:15 PM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	09/26/2000 04:01 PM

		 To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL Approval Profiles

Please add Lisa Lees to the distribution list for the EOL Profiles and remove
Frank Davis.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Start Date: 12/12/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 01:51
PM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 01:38:04 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REVISED ALREADY - CNG JAN 00 numbers

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 01:44 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 01:43 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED ALREADY     - CNG JAN 00 numbers

Please up that to 2,300 dth's/day     starting   1 JAN 2000.

Thanks again!

---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
02:41 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:41 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: CNG JAN 00 numbers

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule a daily total of 2095 to NYSEG off of CNG for Jan 2000.

Thanks!


We have several ISDA with Lehman Brothers.  Attached is an Icon that will
allow you to view the Financial Trading Agreement Database, which all the
Legal Dept., including the London Legal Dept. should use to track their
financial master agreements.  Matt Dawson know how to use this database, if
you need to visit with him.

Link -->

By copy of this email to Mike Neves, I am requesting that you be granted full
edit access to this database (Mike, Denis is a lawyer from London).

	Denis O'Connell
	12/21/2000 03:44 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: URGENT

I would be grateful if you could confirm whether or not Enron Corp. (or
indeed any other Enron entity) has entered into an ISDA with a Lehman
Brothers etity.  If so can you e-mail me the docs ?

Many thanks & seasons greetings,

Denis

---------------------- Forwarded by Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT on 21/12/2000
09:43 ---------------------------

Clare.Godson@AllenOvery.com on 20/12/2000 18:30:46
To: Denis.O'Connell@enron.com, nicholas.j.stephan@enron.com,
mihoward@lehman.COM, Simon.Brooks@enron.com, avaradha@lehman.com
cc:

Subject: ISDA negotiation between LBIE and EnronCredit.com

Further to our telephone conference call this afternoon I thought it would
be useful to set out the points that were discussed and the outstanding
issues together with an indication of who is responsible for the next step
on those points.  Please find attached a document which does this.  I
understand that the parties would like to have a further conference call
tomorrow or probably more likely on Friday to revisit these issues and see
what progress has been made.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries.

Kind regards,

Clare Godson
Allen & Overy

======================================================================

This email is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20) 7330
3000 and requesting the Technology Services Helpdesk. You should not copy it
or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.

Allen & Overy
One New Change
London
EC4M 9QQ

Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000
Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999
General Email: Helpdesk@allenovery.com
www: http://www.allenovery.com

Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership.  A list of the names of partners
and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the above
office.  The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.

======================================================================

 - table of outstanding issues lehmans.DOC


Jeff - Attached is the draft letter to Commissioner
Wood.  This letter has not yet been sent out.

Rachel McMahon
Policy Analyst
CEERT
v: 415-861-8140
f: 415-865-5494
rachel@ceert.org

--- "Dasovich, Jeff" <Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com> wrote:
> Hi Rachel:
>
> John White asked me to contact you.  He said you
> could email me a copy
> of the letter that you and Sarah are working on
> regarding Carl Wood's
> statements about green direct access.  Is possible
> to get a copy
> emailed?  Thanks very much for your help.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
> its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential
> and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please
> contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
> attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer
> (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
> (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other party, and may not be relied
> on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
> or otherwise. Thank you.
>
**********************************************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 02:55
PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
12/27/2000 02:49 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Please call Ben Jacoby and see if we can push our meeting to 230.  Please
advise Stuart that I'm planning to meet with Ben at 230, and invite him to
join.

Thanks,

Kay


Kathy Clark as EECC has the electronic version of the turbine contract. Rob
Taylor at Andrew & Kurth probably has the electronic files for the other
document.  Rose Engeldorf might have the electronic files as well.

Kay

	Enron Global Finance

	From:  Catherine Clark @ ECT                           10/17/2000 07:02 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: electronic documents for WestLB/TurboPark

Kay,
I'm working with Lisa Bills on the Turbo Park facility.  All the West LB
documents that I have are in bound volumes, and I'm constantly being asked
for copies of sections.  Do you happen to have any final documents in an
electronic format?  If not, can you point me toward someone who might have
these files?  Lisa has several documents, but she is not sure they are the
final version...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!
-Catherine
x3-9943


Dear Dr. Kaminski

I am sorry I missed your phone call today. I was waiting for your call until
7:50 am (Australia time) this morning. My mother-in-law told me you ringed
me at 8:05. I guess we made a mistake at the time difference. I promise I
won't leave home tomorrow until I receive your call.

Your faithfully
Quentin
---------------------------------
Quentin Kerr,                            email: qkerr@maths.uq.edu.au
Room: 67-625                          Tel: (07)33461428
Department of Mathematics,  The University of Queensland
----- Original Message -----
From: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
To: <qkerr@maths.uq.edu.au>
Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <Grant.Masson@enron.com>;
<Alex.Huang@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 15 August 2000 2:09
Subject: Re: Telephone Interview with the Houston Research Group

>
> Hi Quentin:
>
> I have scheduled the interview for 7:00 AM, Thursday, August 17 (your time
> 5:00PM  Wednesday, August 16, our time).  They will call you at your home,
> 011-61-7-38798780.
>
> Regards,
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
>
>
>
>


---------------------- Forwarded by kpeterso/EPEC on 06/11/2001 02:54 PM
---------------------------

"Harasin, Leaf" <Leaf.Harasin@ENRON.com> on 06/09/2001 05:43:40 AM

To:   <kpeterso@epelectric.com>, <rhawki1@epelectric.com>
cc:

Subject:  El Paso Model for June 8, 2001

(See attached file: 6_08act.xls)

 - 6_08act.xls


Just wanted to thank you for last Thursday's presentation to the new hire
Associates and Analysts.  I appreciate the time and effort spent on the
presentation.

Sincerely,
Maricela Trevino


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
03:48 PM ---------------------------

Scott Crowell <scott.crowell@oracle.com> on 06/09/2000 10:51:45 AM
To: Phillip Love <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Jenny's Resume

Phil,

I have attached Jenny's resume.  Don't forget to fill out the paperwork
before you pass the resume along so you get credit.  Please try and do
this as soon as you can.  Thanks.

Scott

 - Jenny Resume.doc
 - scott.crowell.vcf


OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION

Your Date of Migration is: Monday, June 11th

YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action:
Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed email
items as possible BEFORE your date of migration.? After you are migrated to
Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox space.?? If more
than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEND
E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit.? Cleaning up your Notes email now
will prevent this from happening to YOU.

Enron,s messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook
2000 worldwide.  You will be accessing Outlook for all of your email
functions.

WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000?

Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to
Microsoft Exchange/Outlook.  The most prominent factors were:

? Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated with
current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer)
? More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features
? Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices
? Instant Messaging capabilities

WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000?

? Email Messages.  From the date of your scheduled migration, the last (30)
thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook.
? All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in.
? To Do Items
? Journal Items
? Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten years in
the future will be converted.
? Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created.  You will
need to re-create these in Outlook.

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


I meant to email you over the weekend to let you know it was on it's way.
Just be sure to fill out the matching gifts form.  Please let me know if
there is any hold up on that.

Looks like we will not make it back to Auburn until the fall for football
season.  I will give you a call a few weeks before we come in to set up a
tour of the raptor center/vet school.  Thanks again for your help in
completing this special occasion for my family.

Talk to you soon.
PL

hendrix2@alumni.auburn.edu on 04/02/2001 11:06:25 AM
To: Phillip.M.Love@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Dr. Burgess

Phillip ... wanted to let you know the check arrived this past week and
I've taken it to accounting for deposit.  We will await the Enron match.

Thank you again, and especially for thinking about having Enron match the
family's gifts to this memorial scholarship. That will help it add up in a
hurry.

Do you know when you will be in Auburn next?

sam


Dan:

Please handle this.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 01:23 PM -----

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	11/03/2000 01:56 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: UGI Utilities Contract

Okay, I wasn't sure who to route this to, but one of our traders gave Claire
Neri at UGI my name and number to help with information about our contracts.
As it turns out, we do not have a Master Contract with UGI but have a firm
term deal  attached to a GTC (Deal #345010, running from 11/1/00 - 3/31/01,
5380 MMBTu/day @ $4.78, meter #103702 on ANR).

UGI's hope is to get a Master agreement in place ASAP to cover the above
mentioned deal & any new inter gas deals (since she sent their master, I'm
assuming that their intent is to put their master in place ASAP). Claire Neri
can be reached at 610-796-3505 for additional information of
changes/negotiations.

Note: UGI is also an EOL "Investment Grade" counterparty for non-Texas natual
gas.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron on
11/03/2000 01:38 PM ---------------------------

"Neri, Claire J." <cneri@ugi.com> on 11/03/2000 01:06:01 PM
Please respond to "Claire J. Neri" <cneri@ugi.com>
To: "Cindy Balfour-Flannigan" <cbalfou@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Contract

Cindy, Thanks for your help. - Claire
 - ugimaster.doc


check  font size
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

Tanya Rohauer
01/07/2000 04:44 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Gaylord

Could you review the Credit Provision section for "legalese"?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000 04:43
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           01/07/2000 04:30 PM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Gaylord


In an effort to continually improve the overall quality of the
Analyst/Associate Programs, the Program Management would appreciate your
feedback on the current state of the programs.  In order to insure
confidentiality, Executive Leadership Associates has been engaged to receive
your feedback and summarize it for the Program Management.

Please reply to this email with your answers to the questions below no later
than Friday, July 20, 2001 to insure your views are included in the summary
of survey data.

If you have any questions or technical difficulties regarding the survey,
either email me at ramabile@execlead.com or call:

Dick Amabile at Executive Leadership Associates, (281) 361-3691.

1. Please place an X to the right of the category that best describes your
role.  Please check all that apply.
"Are you?"
-A business unit supervisor/manager:
-A PRC Representative:
-An HR Representative:

2. Please put an X to the right of the item that best reflects your level of
overall agreement with this statement.

"Overall, the Analyst/Associate Programs meet my business needs":

Strongly Agree ---
Agree ---
Partly Agree/Partly Disagree ---
Disagree ---
Strongly Disagree ---

3. If you could improve one thing related to the Analyst/Associate Program,
what would it be? (Please try to focus on the one key area with a concise
reply)
Type your response here:


Happy landing!  <<quantas.jpg>>

 - quantas.jpg


Please see attached clean.  The Compare Documents feature won't work (too big or something), but here are the substantive changes:

?	I reorganized the Executive Summary
?	As for market risk limit violations and loss notifications, Sr. Mgmt changed so they're no longer going to Skilling for Commodity Group and Business Unit levels, although he still approves those limits.
?	Clarified employee trading requirements
?	We heavily edited the Roles & Responsibilities section to avoid duplication (cut in half )
?	Also, scrubbed the entire body so it should be in good shape now.

Today, Thursday, we will refine the Glossary and clear any comments from Whalley, Buy, Glisan, etc.. - we should be wrapping up by the end of the day.  Also, AA and PWC should be signing off today.

Regards,
Cassandra
(and Scott Vonderheide)

(no change from yesterday)


Per your request a few weeks ago, Global Contracts prepared a list of
executed financial masters for Bob Bowen which he forwarded up to me.  Let me
know what you think.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:57 PM -----

	Bob Bowen
	05/03/2000 12:42 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Listing of Financial Contracts in Global Contracts

What are Finalcial Contracts?? (See subject below on Connie's memo)

Attached please find the gospel according to Global Contracts.  Please
correct your
records accordingly.

If you have any questions , please contact Anthony Campos or Karen Lambert
(or,
alternatively, you may consider suicide prior to making such a phone call).

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 12:28 PM
---------------------------

Connie Sutton
04/25/2000 07:24 PM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Listing of Finalcial Contracts in Global Contracts

 Here is a listing of all the Financial contracts we currently have in
Global. The listing shows the type of contract and the transaction types each
contract allows, that is why the same contract number will be listed several
times.  If you would like clarification on any contract please contact
Anthony Campos at 3-7911.


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
02:12 PM ---------------------------

Wil Uecker <uecker@rice.edu> on 04/10/2001 09:46:32 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: ALP presentation

Vince,

Thank you for the invitation. I will attend the presentation, but have
another commitment for dinner.

Please indicate the specific room for the presentation when it is known.

Thanks,

Wil

At 08:13 AM 4/10/01 -0500, you wrote:
>On behalf of  Enron Corp. I would like to invite you to an ALP Project
>presentation by a group of students
>of Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University.
>
>The students will present the results of a research project regarding
>electronic trading
>platforms in the energy industry.
>
>The presentation will be held on May 7, at 4:00 p.m. at Enron, 1400 Smith.
>
>We would also like to invite you to dinner, following the presentation.
>
>
>Vince Kaminski
>
>Vincent Kaminski
>Managing Director - Research
>Enron Corp.
>1400 Smith Street
>Room EB1962
>Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
>Phone:    (713) 853 3848
>      (713) 410 5396 (cell)
>Fax  :      (713) 646 2503
>E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


Steve,

I really need the Oasis and PGE transport contracts assigned to HPL by July
2000.  Currently, we are buying gas in the Waha region as HPLC.  But since
our transport is under ENA, we have to enter an additional transaction where
HPL sales the gas to ENA at the point of purchase.  ENA then transports the
gas to a delivery point.  If the gas is sold to another counterparty, an
additional transaction between ENA and HPL must be entered at the delivery
point.  This causes great difficulty in balancing out the pipelines and
completing the scheduling in reasonable time.  Plus, it just doesn't make
sense to keep the transport under ENA since we transact all other deals as
HPLC.  Please let me know when we can get these contracts assigned.

Thanks for your help.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000
04:22 PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
04/04/2000 04:47 PM
To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

Steve,

How are things going with this request?

FYI.  The majority of deals we transact on Oasis are done as HPLC.  Only
sales to LCRA and term sales to Tufco are done as ENA.

Thanks.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000
04:44 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dan J Hyvl                           03/22/2000 01:00 PM

To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport contracts

Please forward this to whoever in the Pipeline group does transport,
especially Oasis, and I disagree that it should be HPL cause most of the
things off Oasis are ENA and will continue to be.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000 12:56 PM
---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
03/22/2000 12:05 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

Dan,

ENA - Texas currently has tranport contracts on PGEV and Oasis pipelines
(listed below).  Since we are transacting as Houston Pipe Line for the
majority of our trades, we need these contractsto be assigned from ENA to
HPL.  Or, we need to enter into new agreements as HPL.  What is the process
used to accomlish this?  We would like to get this set up as soon as we can.

Thanks.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
12:00 PM ---------------------------
Stacey Neuweiler   03/21/2000 12:21 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

D-

The Oasis contract #s are:  028 27099 201
        028 27099 202
        028 27099 203
        028 27099 204

PG&E contract #s are: 5095-037
   5098-695
   9121
   5203-010

PG&E parking and lending contracts awaiting approval: PLE00004
       PLA00004


_________________________________________________________________

                   I N V E S T I N G  B A S I C S
                     Wednesday, November 29,2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219248
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=219249

ASK THE FOOL

This weekly e-mail offers answers to questions that perplex most
beginning and intermediate investors and throws in an
investing-related lesson, as well. Enjoy!

-- Q.  What do you think of viaticals as investments?

-- A. Viatical settlements have grown in popularity in recent
years. But they're not without risk and they may make some
people uncomfortable.

Viatical settlements are when a terminally ill person sells his
or her life insurance policy to someone else. Imagine John,
stricken with a fatal form of cancer. He's 36 and is expected to
live only three more years. If he needs cash to pay for medical
bills or just to spend and enjoy, he might sell his life
insurance policy to Jane. If it's set to pay $100,000 on his
death, Jane might pay $66,000 for it. That way he gets a lot of
cash now and Jane expects to get the $100,000 in about three
years. At that rate, she'd be earning roughly a 15 percent
annual return.

There are many risks, though. John may hang on for seven years,
significantly reducing Jane's return. Indeed, a cure for his
cancer might be discovered. John may even outlive Jane! It's
true that these settlements can provide a service for sick
people, but they're not necessarily win-win. The middlemen
arranging these settlements take cuts. Also, if John lives, he's
without his life insurance policy and few insurers will want to
insure him, as he's been so sick recently.

We're uneasy about investing in something that has us rooting
for speedy deaths and against medical breakthroughs. Also, there
have been many instances of fraud with viaticals.

-- Q. What does "shrinkage" mean in the business world?

-- A. It refers to the loss of inventory that happens through
usual ways, such as accidental breakage, theft, weather damage,
etc.

Got some questions of your own for the Fool? Head to our Help
area or post your question on the Ask a Foolish Question
discussion board.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219250
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219251

_________________________________________________________________

INVESTING BASICS - IN THE MARGINS

If you're new to investing, you've probably stared at an income
statement (sometimes called a statement of operations) and
scratched your head, wondering what it's telling you. Let us
help.

First, understand that the income statement summarizes sales and
profits over a period of time. It might cover three months or a
year, for example. It will usually offer information for the
year-ago period as well, so you can compare the two and spot
trends.

Here's a slightly dated but nevertheless interesting example.
Let's look at Eskimo Pie Corp.'s income statement for fiscal
year 1998. At the top, as with every income statement, you'll
find net sales (sometimes called revenues). For Eskimo Pie,
they're $63.5 million.

From now on, as we work down the income statement, various costs
will be subtracted from the revenues, leaving different levels
of profit. The item you'll find just under revenues is "cost of
goods sold" (abbreviated as COGS and sometimes called cost of
sales), which represents the cost of producing the products or
services sold. For Eskimo Pie it's $37.4 million. Subtract the
COGS from revenues, and you'll get a gross profit of $26.1
million.

To find the gross profit margin, simply divide the gross profit
by revenues. $26.1 million divided by $63.5 million yields a
gross margin of 41 percent. (Compare results with industry
peers. For example, at a similar time, gross margin was 35
percent for Ben & Jerry's, which has a somewhat different
business model.)

Next, the remaining costs involved in operating the business,
such as support staff salaries, utility bills and advertising
expenses, are subtracted, leaving the operating profit. Eskimo
Pie's operating profit is $1.8 million. Divide this by revenues,
and you get a slim operating margin of 2.8 percent. This reveals
the profitability of the company's principal business. (Ben &
Jerry's: 4.3 percent.)

Finally, after items such as taxes and interest payments are
accounted for, we come to net income, near the bottom of the
statement. Eskimo Pie's is $0.8 million. Divide that by revenues
and you get a net profit margin of 1.3 percent. (Ben & Jerry's:
3 percent.) The last part of the income statement is where the
company divides its net income by shares outstanding, to arrive
at earnings per share (EPS).

That's it!
_________________________________________________________________

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

-- Learn more about margins and other ways to evaluate companies
   in our How to Value Stocks area.
   http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219252

-- Every weekday we feature a "Fribble," usually penned by a
   member of our online community. These are short essays on
   investing and/or life.
   http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219253

-- Worried about how you're going to pay for your own or your
   kid's college education? Check out our collection on the topic.
   http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219254
_________________________________________________________________

A NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR(

I hope you're finding this product useful. The content
originally appeared as part of our nationally syndicated
newspaper feature (which I also prepare). Consider giving your
local editor a jingle and suggesting that they think about
carrying the Fool.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219255

Selena Maranjian
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219256

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219257
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219258
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219259
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219260
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219261

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=219262

ARE YOU ENROLLED IN WIRELESS 201?
 Don't miss the sequel to the best-selling
 report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=219263

FREE BOOK FOR FOOLS ONLY!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=219264

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219265

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=219266
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-8990-2000-11-29_15-03-54-5423412_5_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-15:12:45(11-29
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Opps, see revisied price.

Dan we need to admend the Galveston Port Art contract to reflect the
following
price changes ( from IF + adder to fixed price + adder) :

Date   Volume   Price

Jul 01 - Oct 01    525 a day  $5.20 plus adder
Nov 01     875 a day  $5.27 plus adder
Dec 01 - Feb 02  1,800 a day  $5.33 plus adder
Mar 02 - Jun 02    525 a day  $4.53 plus adder

---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001
09:04 PM ---------------------------

Janet H Wallis
04/03/2001 08:50 AM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: pat.anderson@southernunionco.com
Subject: Galveston / Port Art.

Dan we need to admend the Galveston Port Art contract to reflect the
following
price changes ( from IF + adder to fixed price + adder) :

Date   Volume   Price

Jul 01 - Oct 01    525 a day  $5.20 plus adder
Nov 01     875 a day  $5.27 plus adder
Dec 01 - Feb 02  1,800 a day  $5.33 plus adder
Mar 02 - Jun 02    525 a day  $5.53 plus adder

Thanks,

Janet


>  >>This is to voice the rights of ALL the women in
> the world.
>  >>
>  >>GIRL POWER!!!
>  >>Men are scum!  Women are future rulers of the
> world!
>  >>allen
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>>>  A WOMEN'S PLACE IS
>  >>>>  IN THE HOUSE-
>  >>>>  AND IN THE SENATE.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MEN ARE LIKE
>  >>>>  TOILETS-EITHER OCCUPIED OR FULL OF SHIT.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MENopause
>  >>>>  MENtal anxiety
>  >>>>  MENstrual cramps
>  >>>>  MENtal breakdown...
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  Ever notice how all our problems begin with
> MEN?
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  SURE, GOD MADE MEN BEFORE WOMEN, BUT EVERYONE
> HAS TO MAKE A ROUGH
>  >>>>  DRAFT
>  >>>>  BEFORE A FINAL COPY!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  GOD MADE RIVERS,
>  >>>>  GOD MADE LAKES,
>  >>>>  GOD MADE MEN,
>  >>>>  WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES!!!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  OF COURSE I DON'T LOOK AS BUSY AS A MAN-I DID
> IT RIGHT THE FIRST
>  >>>>  TIME!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  MEN HAVE THE POWER TO DESTROY THE EARTH, BUT
>  >>>>  WOMEN HAVE THE WISDOM
>  >>>>  TO SAVE IT!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  IF WOMEN HAVE 2 X
>  >>>>  CHROMOSOMES AND MEN ONLY HAVE ONE, THEN THAT
> MEANS
>  >>>>  WOMEN ARE 100%
>  >>>>  WOMEN AND MEN ARE 50% WOMEN.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  I WISH MY MOM WOULD HAVE TOLD
>  >>>>  ME THE SAME THING ABOUT GUYS AS SHE
>  >>>>  SAID TO ME ABOUT HORROR MOVIES
>  >>>>  WHEN I WAS FIVE-DON'T WORRY HONEY-IT'S
>  >>>>  ALL FAKE!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  NEVER CRY OVER A GUY!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  BEHIND EVERY GREAT MAN IS A GREATER WOMAN.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  YOU HAVE TO KISS A LOT OF FROGS BEFORE YOU
> KISS A PRINCE.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  WHEN GOD MADE MEN, SHE WAS ONLY KIDDING!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  GOD CREATED DINOSAURS,
>  >>>>  GOD DESTROYED DINOSAURS.
>  >>>>  GOD CREATED MAN,
>  >>>>  MAN DESTROYS GOD..
>  >>>>  MAN CREATES
>  >>>>  DINOSAURS,
>  >>>>  DINOSAURS DESTROY MAN...
>  >>>>  WOMEN INHERIT THE EARTH!
>  >>>>
>  >>>>  SEND THIS TO EVERY GIRL YOU KNOW TO SPREAD
> THE
>  >>>>  MESSAGE
>  >>
>  >>Yeah!  Send this message!! Go Girls!!


Please, use a new template stored in the   Plans2001   folder
for today's project lists.

Over the last few weeks we had several parallel
copies of the same file floating around.

I have updated he list of group members in the first sheet.
Please, make sure I have not  omitted anybody.

Vince

O:\Research\Common\FROM_WJK\PLANS\2001Plans


Hi,

I found your names in the evening MBA directory of the Haas web site.
Please ignore this message if you are not interested in being a key
founding player in an early stage startup.

I have a compelling business idea, have built a web site
http://www.jiss.com/, and have good management background in
software/web development.  I am looking for key members to form
a strong founding team to help secure funding and build the business.

If you have management experience in the functions of business
development, or sales and marketing particularly in the software or
consulting industry, and is convinced of the idea presented in my
web site, please contact me.

thanks,
Dowson


Just thought you'd like to know where we stand so far...

---------------------- Forwarded by Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Wade R Price
03/10/2000 11:54 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Melissa K Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Herald Oil & Gas Jan Actuals

For Herald Oil & Gas, I will set up the meters on the deal with deducts and
OOGEEP, and get the actual volumes in.  Unify will calculate the difference.
We will pay them on actuals from here on out.  I paid them originally because
Herald was in that stack of producers we "create"an invoice for.

Power Gas and Phillips were paid yesterday (money going out today).  Kathy
Kelly and Chris Germany set up some buy/sell deals so we could pay them and
bill CES.  I gave them a list of similar deals for T & F, Questa, Phoenix
Dominion.

I got a call from Jim Spear at CNG Field Services for some CPA gas for
January.  I left him a message to send me the invoice he previously sent to
CES.  I'll get a deal set up and refer it to Kathy and Chris to finsh their

For Richard Burkland and William S Burkland (both CPA), I have no
information.  Can you supply any ?

They are still trying to get transport contracts set up for the various pipes
for "CES" production in order to be able to path and track and balance all of
these meters we have entered on deals.  I am sending Global Facilities a list
of meters for initial set up in the system, meters for tax codes to be set,
and I will be putting the OOGEEP deducts on the deals.  And last but not
least, I am setting up and assigning statement groups (a list of parties with
no payment addresses set up is going out to Global Counter Party shortly) so
I can draft these statements after the volumes are put in.

In between,I am setting up some spreadsheets for CNG, CGAS, and Gatherco
information we have received to help track payments and information.

I need some assistance with the pricing for Kenoil , RB Robertson, Cutter
Oil, and a question on Oxford.  Please give me a call today when you can.

Attached is the updated (as of Wednesday) spreadsheet of CES Appalachian
Deals.

Thanks  WRP


THEY WILL CONDUCT THE MIGRATION TONIGHT...LOGOFF YOUR COMPUTERS BEFORE YOU LEAVE.

THANKS

TJAE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 8:51 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_UBSW Energy
Subject:	DRAFT:  INFORMATION, Please Read: UBSWE Migration postponed

Due to a variety of circumstances we did not migrate employees to the UBSWE environment tonight (Monday, February 4, 2002). We will communicate further details of the migration plan on Tuesday, February 5, 2002.

Thank you for your cooperation in advance, please contact the Resolution Center at x 3-1411 should you have any questions.

UBSW Energy Global Infrastructure


?

Hi  Folks

Before we get  started...

Congratulations on being in  the playoff hunt.? That's something to be proud
of.? You have to be a  little bit lucky to get this far but don't hesitate to
pat yourself on the back  as skill plays a huge part.? Judging from the
emails, tons of you are still  in mix.? Don't forget about our Wall of
Champions feature  where we'll showcase league winners.? Stay tuned for more
details.

It's crunch time so  let's jump right into our  Upgraded and Downgraded
Players.? As we head down the  final weekend for many teams, identifying
those players moving up or down can be  the difference between?dominating
your Fantasy Bowl or just finishing in  the money.? As we head into our  16th
week of listing these players, it,s inevitable that some guys  will have made
both the upgrade or downgrade list.? Make sure you understand, what we,re
talking about is players that are moving.?  In other words, a player like TE
Ricky Dudley could appear on the  downgrade list and still be good enough to
be a starter in your league.? It just means I,m concerned about the  way he
seems to be heading.?  Likewise, a player like WR Willie Jackson may make the
upgrade list even  though he,s still fairly far down the list of WRs.? It,s
all about which direction players  are moving.? Keeping an eye on these
trends as they can very often make all the difference.

Joe

?

Upgrades and  Downgrades.? Some of these  players are obvious moves up or
down and some aren't as clear.? Here's my  list of guys I see moving this
week.

QBs Moving  Up?

QB Jeff Garcia (SF)?  Cheatsheets.net Poster Boy Jeff Garcia continues to
roll.? No  coincidence that Terrell Owens returned with a vengeance this week.

QB Donovan McNabb (Phi)? Mixed  emotions here as I've been hyping McNabb for
weeks as the guy carrying the  Eagles offense.? But seeing him on my
opponent's roster in the FanEx  playoffs yesterday was less than heartening
throwing for 4 TDs and 390  yards.? Just be aware the Eagles are off this
week and won't return till  week 17.?

QB Jon Kitna (Sea)? Like Mike  Holmgren, maybe I've been too critical of
Kitna.? He continues to play well  and while it likely won't be in Seattle,
he looks like a starter for some team  in 2001.

QB Aaron Brooks (NO)? A telling  mark of a great QB is how he performs when
he comes with less than his "A"  game.? Brooks looked much less in synch
Sunday and clearly struggled at  times making a few bad throws and missing
open receivers.? Yet he hung in  and still posted outstanding numbers.? His
108 rushing yards quietly add to  the points.? He's a player.? I'm starting
him with few  reservations.?

QB Kerry Collins (NYG)? You  have to believe his confidence is sky high.? He
obviously benefited from  the return of Ike Hilliard (who looked very good)?
This team is looking  very tough and very balanced right now.? The running
game is just good  enough to be a real worry for the defense but not so
dominant that it hurts the  QB.

QB Mark Brunell (Jac)? It's  really weird.? When the hype finally subsides
about this guy, he starts  delivering Fantasy numbers worthy of hype.? Go
figure.?

QB Kurt Warner (StL)? This may  have been the greatest QB performance in the
history of the league without  scoring a TD.? The guy was incredible
completing 84% of his passes (27 of  32)? Completing 84% with an average pass
of 12.8 yards is sick.? The  TDs will come as Warner looked as good as I've
ever seen him placing the ball  perfectly and directing his offense.

QB Ray Lucas (NYJ)? Keep an eye  on Vinnie's groin.? Better yet, watch the
injury reports for news on  Vinnie's groin.? That's better.? We should know
more soon but if it's  serious, Lucas will get the start.

?

RBs Moving Up

RB Marshall Faulk (StL)? I know  you don't need me to list him here but it's
worth noting I think he may be the  best player in the league right now.?
Martz fed him the ball 25 times and  he delivered.

RB Eddie George (Ten)? George  showed outstanding pass receiving skills and
added 2 receiving TDs to go with  his rushing TD.? He reinjured his sore toe
but looks to be ok.? Keep  an eye on it though.

RB Fred Taylor (Jac)? What a  shocker.? Taylor runs wild again as we
predicted.? He did tweak a knee  so watch that but if he can go full speed,
he's a no brainer starter against  just about anyone.

RB James Allen (Chi)? If  departed Offensive Coordinator Gary Crowton was
dead (don't get excited Bears  fans, he's not), he'd be spinning in his grave
to see Allen garner 37 carries  Sunday.? Be a little leery though as a 2.6
ypc carry average only works  when you carry the ball a ton.?

RB Travis Prentice (Cle)? After  fading badly, Prentice comes roaring back
with a 2 TD performance.? He only  had 46 yards on 17 attempts but the TDs
are huge.? The Brown offense  featured some crazy looks with Kevin Johnson
occasionally at QB but they looked  much better.

RB Mike Anderson (Den)? What  else can you say?? The Denver OL is having
another Pro Bowl season.?  Anderson is a must start vs any team right now.

RB Ahman Green (GB)? I'm very  nervous if I'm Dorsey Levens right now.?
Green's been an offensive stalwart  carrying the load week after week.?
Everyone always knew he had the  potential to be this good but now he's
delivering.

RB Emmitt Smith (Dal)? As was  mentioned on the broadcast yesterday, "Someone
forgot to tell the Redskins this  game is a rivalry"? You know the Cowboys
and Emmitt in particular had to  enjoy humiliating the Redskins.? It would be
a bold move even for him but I  wouldn't be surprised in the least to see
Danny Snyder fire Terry Robiskie  before his obligatory three games are up.?

RB Jamal Lewis (Bal)? Once  again, Lewis rolls over the opponents and makes
me look bad for dissing him this  Summer...? Against the Cardinals this week,
he has the chance to be even  better.

RB Warrick Dunn (TB)? If Dunn  had any help, the Bucs would scary.? Right
now, he's doing it all by  himself.? Which probably isn't a bad thing for
Dunn owners.

RB Tony Richardson (KC)?  Richardson netted 5.2 ypc on 17 carries.? Donnell
Bennett looks to have  cartilage damage to his knee so Richardson's workload
should increase.?  It's a shame someone has to get hurt for Gunther
Cunningham to give Richardson  more looks.

RB Tshimanga Biakabutuka (Car)?  Don't hold your breath but Biakabutuka is
making noises about returning to the  lineup this week.? We'll see...

RB Terry Allen (NO)? In a  lesser version of Denver's OL, it appears most
anyone can run effectively behind  these guys.? Allen looked rejuvenated
Sunday and should only get better as  he gets familiar with the system.

RB Chris Warren (Phi)? Remember  that he's off this week but if your league
runs through week 17, he could be a  factor.?

?

WRs Moving Up

WR Sean Dawkins (Sea)??  Dawkins is quietly posting some very strong
numbers.? As is Jon  Kitna.? Dawkins is drawing a lot of looks and could
continue his  roll.

WR Torrance Small / Charles Johnson  (Phi)? Look what QB Donovan McNabb can
do when his WRs decide to  show up.? If they can continue to play well, this
team could be  scary.? Remember they're off this week but return in week 17.

WR Amani Toomer (NYG)? Of the resurging Giants,  Toomer's leading the
charge.? He's making plays all over the field and even  had a nice run again.

WR Terrell Owens (SF)? The  scary part is he could have been even better than
the 129 yard / 1 TD  performance Sunday.? He looked very good coming back
from the toe injury  and should only get better.? The 49ers are trying to
nail down their WR  corps for 2001 and Owens is making a statement.

WR Ed McCaffrey (Den)? It's  easy to get excited whenever he outplays Rod
Smith but the truth of the matter  is that they're both excellent WRs.? I
love McCaffrey and his 6th grade  shoulder pads.? He's the anti-Eric
Dickerson when it comes to pads (or lack  thereof)? Easy Ed goes with pretty
much the Helmet and Pee Wee Shoulder  pads and that's it.? Oh yeah, he's also
a great WR...

WR Darrell Jackson (Sea)?  Jackson made the Upgrade List last week and
delivered.? I see few reasons  why he won't continue to shine.

WR Torry Holt (StL)? It's tough  to predict which Ram WR will catch the
passes from Warner but as I said several  weeks ago, Holt may be the best WR
on the team.? And that's no sleight to  Isaac Bruce - Holt's that good.?

WR Terry Glenn (NE)??  Glenn's putting together one of his most complete
seasons.? And Bledsoe's  continuing to play pretty good football which helps.

WR Willie Jackson (NO)? 1  catch.? 1 TD.? You gotta like a guy who gets right
to the point.?  Joe Horn is the clear #1 threat but Jackson is a serious
option too.

WR Germane Crowell (Det)? This  didn't look like a guy returning from a
broken leg.? He should continue to  get better as he becomes more involved in
the flow of things.

WR Bobby Shaw (Pit)? It seems  hard to believe, but Bobby Shaw is a
legitimate starter in many leagues.?  He's getting lots of looks and the
Steeler are throwing the ball.

WR Ike Hilliard (NYG)? Hilliard  looked well rested as he roared back onto
the scene.? An sprained knee  suffered by Joe Jurevicius will likely increase
Hilliard's playing time even  further.

WR Donald Hayes (Car)? Hayes  looked better as expected and turned in a nice
game catching 5 passes for 77  yards.? The Panthers need to remain focused
but if they can, Hayes could  contribute.

?

TEs Moving Up

TE Johnny McWilliams (Min)?  McWilliams again was active catching 5 passes
for 53 yards.? I like any  receiver on this team.

TE Andrew Glover (NO)? Glover's  starting to become a very integral part of
the New Orleans passing game.?  It's hard to imagine this team losing
Ricky?Williams, Jeff Blake and Cam  Cleeland.

TE Kris Mangum (Car)? He's no  Wesley Walls but he's more than adequate.

TE Greg Clark (SF)? He only had  24 yards but the 4 receptions were a nice
bonus.?

?

QBs Moving  Down

QB Scott  Mitchell (Cin)? The clock struck midnight as Mitchell became the
guy we remembered.? This team is pretty much Corey Dillon and a roll of the
dice with Peter Warrick for his big play potential.

QB Jeff  George (Was)? I've gotta say I'm really surprised George didn't
post some great numbers.? Albert Connell isn't nearly as good as he thinks
he is and that may be part of the problem.

QB Steve  Beuerlein (Car)? It's clear to everyone that 1999 was a career
year.? He's still subject to a great game here and there but he's just too
streaky to lean very heavily on.

QB Shaun  King (TB)? This guy just isn't very good.

QB Charlie  Batch (Det)? I've never been a big Charlie Batch fan although
he's  certainly had his days.? He looked a bit lost at times Sunday and
possibly  losing Herman Moore won't help.? (Although German Crowell is back)

QB Troy  Aikman (Dal)? I hope Aikman does himself a favor and gives Steve
Young a call.? A sore back is one thing.? Not remembering your kid's  names
is an entirely different matter. It's not worth it, Guy.

QB Ryan  Leaf (SD)? Part of it was Baltimore.? A large part of it was  Leaf.

QB Jay  Fiedler (Mia)? Fiedler suffered a torn rotator cuff on his non
throwing shoulder.? The Dolphins will make a decision Wednesday likely
whether it'll be Fiedler or Huard this week at QB.

QB Vinnie  Testeverde (NYJ)? Vinnie suffered a groin injury that may or may
not be serious.? He's not getting any younger though so keep an eye on this
one.

?

RBs Moving  Down

RB Ron  Dayne (NYG)? It's just hard to get excited about starting this guy
as he's such a risk to be taken out of the gameplan.? He's always liable to
grab that short yardage TD but you just don't know when or where they'll
happen.

RB Jerald  Moore (FA)? Things change quickly in this league.? A few  weeks
ago, Moore looked to be the #1 RB.? Now he's unemployed.

RB Darnell  Autry (Phi)?? I'd expect that Chris Warren will cut into his
time when they return.

RB Jamel  White (Cle)? Travis Prentice carried the load while White watched
this week.

RB Brad  Hoover (Car)? He came back to reality this week.? On top of  that,
it looks like his days may be numbered as Tshimanga Biakabutuka looks to  try
and return this week.

?

WRs Moving  Down

WR Herman  Moore (Det)?? Moore suffered?a neck stinger  Sunday.? He could
likely give way to Germane Crowell who looked very good  returning from his
injury.

WR Tai  Streets (SF)? Conventional wisdom had Streets seeing more action  as
the 49ers tried to see what they had for 2001 but with the return of Terrell
Owens, it looks like Streets will be limited.

WR  Courtney Hawkins (Pit)? He's losing time to Bobby Shaw.? The  Steeler WRs
seem to be pretty well set with Hines Ward and Shaw.

WR Danny  Farmer (Cin)? Farmer had made a little noise pushing for a spot
alongside Peter Warrick but it doesn't look like it's going to make any
difference.

WR J.J.  Stokes (SF)? Like Tai Streets, Stokes suffers from the return of
Terrell Owens.?

WR  Sylvester Morris (KC)? Morris continues his regression which  should send
red flags as owners look towards 2001.

WR  Keyshawn Johnson (TB)? With Shaun King struggling, I don't see a  bright
future for Keyshawn ahead.? He sounds like a politician conceding  when he
speaks of the team finding it's identity in running the ball.?

?

TEs Moving  Down

TE Anthony  Becht (NYJ)? In the up and down season from Anthony Becht, it
looks like he's headed down a bit.? The injury to Testeverde affects his
stock in a negative way.

TE Tony  McGee (Cin)? Not that McGee was carrying many FF teams but he
suffered a broken ankle.

TE Jeff  Thomason (Phi)? Looks like Chad Lewis has resumed his role as the
primary TE.?

TE David  LaFluer (Dal)? Between injuries to himself and QB Troy Aikman,
LaFluer was limited and it looks like it may not be changing anytime soon.

?

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


Please see the attached DOE report on Horizontal Market Power in Restructured
Electricity Markets.  Thanks.


Ask Karen for the distribution list she would like to send these to for
today's 1:30 meeting.  Also please reserve 47c1 for the meeting so I can use
the computer screen.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 07:23 AM -----

	Terry West
	02/09/2001 01:36 PM

		 To: Rebecca Carter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Board presentations

Attached are the presentations for the Corporate Staff Group and the 2001
Goals.  There have been slight modifications to the format.


So where are you kayaking this weekend?

ckm


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890 (GCP)
Enron Net Works _ Global Data Mgt.

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/30/2001 04:01 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 03-30-01

Please see attached.


Chris is the CES expert .
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/28/2000 09:07 AM

To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hunt Petroleum

The contract for Hunt Petroleum has been assigned from CES to Enron.  I need
someone to change the names on deals 136863, 135898 and 136845 from CES-Hunt
Petroleum to Hunt Petroleum (without CES).  All of the deals are on the East
desk.  Let me know if this request is to go to one of you or if I need to
forward this to someone else.

Thanks,
Megan


Attached is a preliminary model based on the 1999 10K.  I broke it out by segment so we could see what each piece is valued.  I was not sure what to use as salvage multiples.  The "Other" sheet contains something called eliminations, which I am not sure about.  Also, I was trying to follow Yuan's levered page and had some questions when you have some time.

Michael


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042606.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 104.00 / Final: 103.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  46.69 / Final:  46.48)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Just a note.  Effective April 1st, we will not have the purchase at St 85 or
the PSNC transport.  This is a new contract each month - we are currently
shipping 145 dt's.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 07:10
AM ---------------------------

bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/06/2000 02:02:42 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "        -         *Bizik, Kim" <knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: PSNC for April

Chris,

Please see below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/06/2000
03:00 PM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/06/2000 02:47 PM

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Melissa Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: PSNC for April

Good Afternoon.

Just a heads up so that you may contact Chris Germany.  We have one customer
at
PSNC.  Effective April 1st, CES will no longer be supplying gas to this
customer as their expires.  I just do not want to have a mix up for April and
have Chris contract with PSNC for capacity when none will be needed.  I am in
the process of notifing PSNC.  Just wanted to keep you in the loop and give
you
the option to inform Chris.


We are pleased to announce that Dow Jones Interactive (DJI), the world's most
comprehensive business intelligence service and pre-eminent publisher of The
Wall Street Journal and Barron's, is now available at your desktop.

In an increasingly competitive global business environment, knowledge of
major industry changes is essential for growth and profitability.  Use Dow
Jones Interactive today to stay informed.  You can put this valuable desktop
tool to work for you immediately.

Here's how:

o Access DJI by launching your web browser on the URL below.

Your user name and password are:

URL: http://djinteractive.com
User Name:  sshackl
Password:    ene796627

Note: Please keep this information for future reference.  User Name and
Password are case sensitive.

o In Business Newsstand, scan the latest news on the energy industry.
o In the Publications Library, search over 6,000 publications including those
covering the energy industry.
o In CustomClips, set up alerts to competitor activity from around the world.
o In Company & Industry Center, analyze a potential merger with a full review
of a company,s performance.

If you need help getting started, please contact Dow Jones Customer Service
at 800-369-7466, support@wsj.dowjones.com, or one of the following Dow Jones
representatives:

? Lynn Yost, 713-840-1432, lynn.yost@dowjones.com
? Idella Attuquayefio, 713-626-1592, idella.attuquayefio@dowjones.com

You may also click on the following URL address and follow the self-directed
tutorial: http://ask.djinteractive.com/SAS/eTraining/etweb/index.htm


GAS DAILY
                             ON-LINE EDITION
                             May 15, 2001
***FERC launches formal hearing in El Paso case
     A collection of high-powered attorneys crowded a FERC hearing
room yesterday for the launch of a formal hearing into
allegations of market power abuse by El Paso and its affiliates.
While a decision is still a way off, the presiding judge in the case
made it clear that FERC must find a precise way to measure market
share in California before ruling on the case.
     The hearing also marked the public release of a controversial
market power study by The Brattle Group, which was commissioned
by Southern California Edison to find evidence of market power
abuse by El Paso marketing affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. The
Brattle Group said that it found substantial evidence that El Paso
manipulated California's gas market -- a claim that remains
strongly in dispute (see story, page 4).
     In an opening statement, FERC Chief Administrative Law Judge
Curtis Wagner laid down the parameters for the hearing. The
burden of proof, he said, is on the California Public Utilities
Commission, which filed the original Section 5 complaint against
El Paso. But once a case is made, Wagner added, "the burden of
going forward with evidence to rebut that case shifts to El Paso
Merchant and the parties on its side of the table."
     The case originated last year, when the CPUC asked FERC to
abrogate a series of transportation contracts between El Paso
Natural Gas and El Paso Merchant. The California regulators
claimed the capacity award was rigged, and further complained of
a conspiracy to drive up the delivered price of gas into California.
     In March, FERC dismissed the CPUC's claim that there was
favoritism in the bidding process for El Paso pipeline capacity (GD
3/29). But the commission also sent the case before an ALJ, saying
the case raised larger questions of market power. According to
FERC, certain disputed issues of fact need to be examined at a
hearing before a decision can be rendered.
     One of the biggest issues will be determining whether the
affected market is the entire state of California or whether it is
just Southern California. The CPUC and Southern California Edison
maintain that only the Southern California market is at issue,
while El Paso argues that the case applies to the entire state.
     The outcome of the case could hinge on that distinction. As
Wagner noted in his opening remarks, "The question of the
geographic market makes a tremendous difference in how El Paso
Merchant's market share will be measured and the results."
     If the entire state is considered as a single market, said
Wagner, then El Paso Merchant would have a market share that,
depending on methodology, would range between 17% and 26.8%.
But if the CPUC's contention that the market is Southern
California holds up, he added, then El Paso Merchant's market
share would be between 35% and 44.9%.
     Finding out whether market power exists also depends on how
many players are involved in a particular market. Wagner said
that the parties need to reach a stipulation among counsel on the
number of players. In addition, he said that he would need a better
geographic description of El Paso Merchant's capacity holdings
and information on the price differential of gas between Northern
and Southern California.
     Finally, Wagner directed a number of questions to El Paso. El
Paso Merchant, he said, "should answer the CPUC's question as to
why it subscribed for the involved [1.2 billion cfd] for 15 months
when it had no market for that amount." In addition, said Wagner,
El Paso should "show whether it sold in the secondary market
short-term releases of the excess [capacity] at a price higher than
it paid."
     Wagner also heard arguments over the admissibility of certain
evidence.
     Given the volume of testimony involved, the case will require
some legal heavy lifting before a preliminary decision is reached.
Noting that he received a nearly two-foot high stack of testimony
last week, Wagner said that reading prehearing briefs and
prepared testimony "consumed a very beautiful Sunday in
Washington." (RP00-241)     NH

***El Paso takes aim at Calif. Assembly, study
     In an effort to clear its name in the ongoing California market
power controversy, El Paso is going on the offensive. The company
yesterday issued a riposte to claims -- publicized by California
Assembly members and major newspapers -- that it manipulated
California gas prices. And it took close aim at The Brattle Group, a
consultancy that has figured prominently in various
investigations into the matter.
     According to El Paso, The Brattle Group worked "hand-in-hand"
with a California Assembly subcommittee to pin the blame on El
Paso and its subsidiaries for the run-up in gas prices in the
Golden State. El Paso furnished copies of internal Assembly e-mails
as proof that the subcommittee did not seek to conduct an
objective investigation.
     As reported in Gas Daily, The Brattle Group's study of alleged
market power abuse by El Paso marketing arm El Paso Merchant
Energy has been exhibit A in California pipeline litigation (GD
4/25). In a study commissioned by Southern California Edison, The
Brattle Group concluded that El Paso had deliberately manipulated
California-bound pipeline capacity in an effort to drive up the
price differential between production basins and the California
border.
     Drawing in large part on The Brattle Group's opinion, the
California Assembly Subcommittee on Energy Oversight recently
concluded that El Paso caused the price run-up (GD 4/20).
Representatives of the Assembly's Democratic majority said The
Brattle Group study proved conclusively that the rise in gas
prices at the California border was greater than could be
accounted for through normal market forces.
     But according to El Paso, the subcommittee majority was --
deliberately -- wrong. The inquiry conducted by the subcommittee,
said El Paso, was a "charade that was orchestrated from the
beginning" to shore up SoCalEd's case.
     "El Paso has recently obtained, through discovery in a
proceeding before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
correspondence between the staff for the subcommittee and the
paid litigation consultant [The Brattle Group] for Southern
California Edison," said El Paso in a statement. "This
communication reveals that the subcommittee majority's
conclusions were pre-determined to blame El Paso for California's
failed energy policies."
     The correspondence included apparent requests from
subcommittee staff members for help in "rebutting" El Paso's
testimony before the Assembly. El Paso interpreted those requests
as proof that the subcommittee majority "never intended" to write
an objective report on the matter.
     "We are shocked that the subcommittee delegated its
responsibilities to [SoCalEd's] consultants," said Norma Dunn, El
Paso senior vice president of communications and government
affairs. "We voluntarily met with subcommittee staff and testified
before the subcommittee in good faith, under the false premise
that the subcommittee was interested in seeking the truth. Now we
learn that the subcommittee was working at the direction of
[SoCalEd's] litigation consultants to support SCE's litigation
position."
     Litigation pitting SoCalEd and the California Public Utilities
Commission against El Paso is currently under way at FERC (see
story, page 1). Following yesterday's hearing, Dunn told Gas Daily
that SoCalEd and the CPUC were also waging their campaign against
El Paso in the   national press.
     The New York Times, for instance, has published articles that
relied on The Brattle Group study and other sealed documents.
Dunn said it was "clear" that SoCalEd and the CPUC were using the
selective leak of documents to take the case against El Paso to the
public.
     Prior to recess in yesterday's hearing, FERC Chief
Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner issued a reminder of the
need to restrict access to protected documents.     NH

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : May 15, 2001
El Paso Calls California Subcommittee Hearing a 'Sham'
El Paso Corp. claims it was set up by California Assembly members to take the
blame for high gas prices in the state. It said recent hearings before a
subcommittee were a "sham," and that it was "predetermined" that El Paso
would be accused on wrongdoing in a report approved by the subcommittee
majority yesterday.
While El Paso battled similar accusations at the opening of hearings
yesterday before a FERC administrative law judge, the company publicly
contested the results of the majority report (approved 3-2) of the California
Assembly Subcommittee on Energy Oversight, which placed the blame on the
energy company for skyrocketing gas prices in the state. The majority report
says El Paso drove up gas prices by withholding pipeline capacity from the
market, focusing on the same year-old capacity contract between El Paso's
pipeline and marketing affiliate that is the subject of FERC's investigation.
Contrary to the majority report, however, are the conclusions of a report
prepared for the two Republican members of the five-member subcommittee. That
document said the hearings "produced no conclusive evidence" of price
manipulation.
Although the majority report has not been made public, "it is clear, based on
accounts of the report and recently uncovered documents, that the
subcommittee hearing was a sham," El Paso said in a statement.
El Paso released to the public yesterday documents containing e-mail
correspondence between staff members of the subcommittee and members of the
Brattle Group, a paid consulting firm for Southern California Edison. The
Brattle Group is one of El Paso's main opponents at the hearings this week
before FERC's Chief Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner Jr. Brattle
accuses the company of costing Californians an additional $3.7 billion in gas
costs over the past year.
The correspondence El Paso released reveals a close relationship between the
consulting firm and the subcommittee staff. For example, a staff member said
to Brattle Group's Matthew O'Loughlin, "I can't thank you and Paul enough for
your testimony. It was beyond expectations, the members were highly
impressed. The chairman asked me if you guys could stay and help us with a
second day. We could have used it."
El Paso said the communication reveals that the subcommittee majority's
conclusions were "pre-determined to blame El Paso for California's failed
energy policies." The subcommittee majority was working "hand-in-hand with,
and relying on, SCE's consultant, the Brattle Group, in their so-called
analysis," El Paso said. "In communications between the subcommittee staff
and SCE's consultant, it is clear that SCE's consultant assisted in preparing
questions for the hearing and that the subcommittee staff requested
assistance from SCE's consultant in preparing the final report.
"That the subcommittee majority never intended to conduct an objective
investigation is clear... [R]ather than write an objective report based on
the testimony, the staff went on to ask SCE's consultant for help in
'rebutting' El Paso's testimony."
"We are shocked that the subcommittee delegated its responsibilities to SCE's
consultants," said Norma Dunn, senior vice president of Communications and
Government Affairs for El Paso. "We voluntarily met with subcommittee staff
and testified before the subcommittee in good faith, under the false premise
that the subcommittee was interested in seeking the truth. Now we learn that
the subcommittee was working at the direction of SCE's litigation consultants
to support SCE's litigation position. We are particularly concerned that
after coordinating the questions to be asked, the Brattle Group testified
before the subcommittee as if it were an independent group. It is obvious
that the subcommittee hearings were a charade that was orchestrated from the
beginning. Final conclusions were drawn before we had an opportunity to
testify and then the final report was leaked to the press instead of provided
to us, so that we would not have an opportunity to react."
Dunn said El Paso is confident that once the facts are presented to FERC in
hearings this week, it will be "vindicated."
However, El Paso also faces an uphill battle in Washington. The FERC hearings
pit El Paso and its subsidiaries against the California Public Utilities
Commission and the state's two largest investor-owned utilities, Pacific Gas
& Electric and Southern California Edison.
The regulators and the utilities also allege El Paso withheld capacity on its
pipelines into the state, which in turn pushed prices up. If the charges are
substantiated, FERC Judge Wagner could order the company to refund any money
it earned due to price or supply manipulation. Such a ruling could have even
broader implications because skyrocketing prices for natural gas, the single
biggest source of fuel for power plants in California, obviously contributed
to the financial calamity that brought Southern California Edison to its
knees and sent Pacific Gas & Electric into bankruptcy.
The details of the charges are well known at this point. Critics alleged that
El Paso Merchant Energy Gas LP and El Paso Merchant Energy Co. received
inside information on a discount transportation rate that enabled them to end
up the big winners in an open season in February of last year. The open
season involved 1.22 Bcf/d of firm capacity on El Paso to the California
border.
But in an order on complaint, FERC found "no merit in the allegations." It
cleared El Paso of charges that it rigged the bidding for capacity to favor
its affiliates. Moreover, it said there was no evidence that El Paso violated
its standards of conduct. However, the Commission did not dismiss the
allegations that El Paso engaged in market and price manipulation. It set the
market power issue for hearing in March before Judge Wagner and ordered him
to provide an initial decision within 60 days (see Daily GPI, March 29).
FERC staff also appears to be hot on El Paso's tracks. In testimony submitted
last week before Judge Wagner, FERC staff's expert witness concluded that El
Paso probably exercised market power in the Southern California gas market
and drove up gas prices over the past year when pipeline capacity constraints
existed. FERC Economist Dr. Jonathan D. Ogur concluded that under certain
circumstances El Paso was able to wield market power in the Southern
California gas market (see Daily GPI, May 14).
The rise in California natural gas prices is not attributable to El Paso, the
company said in its statement yesterday, but is attributable to the fact that
demand for gas has far outstripped supply. Evidence presented at the
California subcommittee hearings shows that El Paso has consistently utilized
its pipeline capacity to ship natural gas to California and has never
restricted supply. Constraints on gas infrastructure in the state have
limited the supply of gas during a time in which demand has risen
dramatically, the company said.


in

From:  Bryan Hull
02/07/2001 08:19 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, reagan_mathews@enron.net, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Game at 8

Our game is at 8. Let me know if you are in or out.


engram is ramiro's 4th receiver, you don't get a starting rb (the 10th best i
might add) for a backup WR.

the reason i want engram so bad is b/c i have his qb and i think he will have
a pretty good year.

by the way engram was picked the 8th round, dillon in the 2nd.

so don't give me any of that

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 08/24/2000 07:08:34 AM
To: "'Eric Bass'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Engram

Ramiro believes Engram is going to have a very good year.  He needs a
Running Back.  I don't think he is being ridiculous.  Engram may be ranked
30th now, but you obviously believe he is a little better than that or you
wouldn't want him so bad.

Jason Bass
TSE
Compaq Computer Corporation

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Eric Bass [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 7:03 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: Re: Engram

your boy is being ridiculous - does he really think he will get the 10th
best rb
for the 30th receiver?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000 07:01 AM
---------------------------

LQCOLOMBO@aol.com on 08/23/2000 06:12:52 PM

To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: Engram

In a message dated 8/23/00 7:23:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Eric.Bass@enron.com writes:

<< What Do you want for Engram? >>

At the very least, Corey Dillon


I found this.  Please disregard previous note.
Katherine

Cindy Stark
01/24/2000 11:18 AM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Maryann Long/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Dave
Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lou Potempa/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: MEMORIAL FUND ESTABLISHED

For those of you who would like to make a contribution in the name of Eugene
S. Horton, below are the details:

VITAS Hospice Care
2500 Maitland Center Boulevard
Suite 300
Maitland, FL  32751

Please feel free to pass this information on to concerned individuals within
each of your respective groups.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Cindy
(X36197)


To All:

Recently, Mark asked me to focus efforts on putting together a technology
plan for the Legal Department.  Attached for your information is a draft of
the proposed plan.

As you will see, the central goal of the plan is to enhance our position as
essential members of the business team by providing - through the
implementation of available technology tools  - efficient means of enabling
our clients to meet their business objectives.  The plan attempts to meet
this overall goal through three different, but related phases, each of which
can be implemented independently.  Timing of implementation and dedication of
resources have not been formally addressed as the plan is only in its infant
stages; however, it is Mark's goal to rapidly move forward with certain
portions of the plan.

It is my understanding that a meeting will be scheduled for next week some
time to review and discuss the proposed plan.  Prior to that meeting, if any
of you should have any comments, questions or ideas, please do not hesitate
to let me know your thoughts.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


attached is the latest TW imbalance summary

the reason that the volumetric valuations are lower is because indexes are approximately 80 cents lower than they were at 8/31/01.


Hello,

I just received your message.

Are still in NYC? I like it a lot.
I wish my job was associated with traveling.

According to Saturday meeting - I will be there.

Have a save trip back home.

patrycja

From: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address - Block Sender
To: pdalecka@hotmail.com Save Address
CC: VKaminski@aol.com Save Address
Subject: Re: Hello
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:22:26 EST
Reply  Reply All  Forward  Delete  Previous Next  Close

Hello Patrycja,

Greetings from the Big Apple.

Saturday works for me. Let's meet at 4:00 p.m. at Carrabba's. It's an
Italian
restaurant on I-45 in the Woodlands. After you pass Conroe, take the
Research
Forest exit  (5-10 miles past Conroe) and stay on the feeder road. Go
through
the lights (Research Forest intersection with I-45). As you continue along
the feeder road you will pass on your right the Woodlands Mall and the
ExxonMobil building,. The restaurant will be on your right, about 200-300
yards before the next lights (I-45 and Sawdust).

I shall have my cell phone with me (713 898 9960). In case you arrive early
you can stop at my home: 10 Snowbird Place, (281) 367 5377. I shall send you
later the instructions how to get there. I shall leave home around 3:45.

Look forward to meeting you.

Vince


Please read the e-mail below. Let's take advantage of the many politicians etc. trying to grab some attention from our terrible situation. We need our severance packages of some sort.
It cannot hurt to log on and get some attention to our plight......severance. It takes about 2 minutes tops and automatically faxes for you!

http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/enronworkers2/xbsxeavbbn

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <peoplepower@aflcio.org>
To: Michelle Foust <lmfoust@aol.com>
Date: Friday, March 1, 2002 11:24:46 GMT
Subject:

Dear Michelle Foust,

You and other e-Activists helped bring laid-off Enron
workers closer to justice this week. On Feb. 27, a
bankruptcy court judge ordered Enron to create a fund
for laid-off workers' emergency expenses and told creditors
to negotiate a fair severance settlement.

After you and other e-Activists sent thousands of faxes
to Enron and its creditors, the bankruptcy court asked
for three things. First, Enron should provide immediately
a $5 million fund to pay emergency expenses for laid-off
workers. Second, Enron and its corporate creditors--including
CitiGroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo and the Bank
of New York--must negotiate with laid-off Enron workers
to reach a fair severance settlement. The workers,
Enron and the corporate creditors must report back
to the bankruptcy judge on the progress of their talks
by Tuesday, March 5.

Those workers walked into bankruptcy court with the
support of e-Activists like you--but now they need
your help again. Please take one minute to send a new
fax with a new message to Enron and its corporate creditors.
Negotiations are going on today. Click on the link
below now to take action:
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/enronworkers2/xbsxeavbbn

Then, click on the link below now to tell your friends,
family and co-workers to send a message to Enron's
creditors urging them to agree to a fair severance
package with Enron workers.
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/enronworkers2/forward/xbsxeavbbn

To learn more about this issue, click on the link below
to visit the AFL-CIO's Enron website.
http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/UpabqS51q7a9/

If you received this e-mail from a friend, click on
the link below now to join the Working Families e-Activist
Network.
http://www.unionvoice.org/ct/y1abqS51q7ao/

--------------------------------------------------

If you would like to unsubscribe from Working Families
e-Activist Network, you can respond to this email with
"REMOVE" as the subject, or you can visit your subscription
management page at:

http://www.unionvoice.org/pvtm/index.tcl?nkey=xbsxeavbbn

***********************************************
Click on the link below for more information
from your union, online activism and benefits.
http://www.unionvoice.org/wfn/join.html
***********************************************


i heard there are a lot of hot cougars at changs


First Come First serve:

I have:
10 Shell Houston open badges available. (Let's try to share these as best we
can.)
10 One Day Passes
2 Invitations to Tonights Mardi Gras Party
4 Tickets to this Saturday's Beauty n Blues concert.

This might be a good time to remind you that this week is Secretary's week
(since I am holding all the goodies) Just joking Brenda.

Yvette
x3.5953


If you do not see this  message in html format (with color and images), please visit http://www.rer.com/Marketing/EFG_Training.htm .  RER  Forecasting Workshops: Time well spent.   [IMAGE]   Learn new techniques and  skills in RER's hands-on Forecasting workshops. Forecasts provide the  foundation for both daily operations and market planning. RER training  will equip you with increased knowledge, skills, and confidence. Through a  blend of instruction on forecasting theory with hands-on application,  workshops guide attendees through the steps of building powerful  forecasting models. RER's industry experts cover topics on monthly,  long-term and hourly forecasting in both the electric and gas industries.  No matter what your level of forecasting experience, attending RER's  workshops is time well spent. Click here for the 2002 schedule  and SIGN UP TODAY!    The first workshop is the  Fundamentals of Monthly & Long-Term  Forecasting on March 11-12.  Is your  company interested in end-use forecasting?    [IMAGE]   RER offers end-use data and  forecasting support services through its Energy Forecasting Group (EFG).  RER has been the expert on end-use forecasting since its conception. RER  can help you find data to support your end-use forecasting needs and tell  you how to incorporate demand-side planning (DSM) into your long-term  forecast.  EFG members provide the direction of the group, which  continues to evolve over time. Currently, the EFG provides support  services and the Regional Statistically Adjusted End-use (SAE) Approach  which embodies end-use concepts and trends into a monthly econometric  forecasting framework. Members receive regional versions of the SAE  Approach and the associated regional databases. The residential SAE models  are complete and commercial models will be distributed in 2002.  In  addition, RER coordinates an annual user meeting that includes relevant  topic discussions, a keynote speaker from the EIA, and presentations by  other energy forecasting professionals. The 2002 meeting is scheduled for  March 28-29 at Treasure Island in Las  Vegas, Nevada. An optional golf day will be held on Wednesday,  March 27.   Click here for more information on  the EFG and a registration form.  You may have already received a  hardcopy in your mailbox along with RER's 2002 forecasting workshop  brochure. If you have further questions please contact us at 800-755-9585  or info@rer.com   [IMAGE]   You received  this email because you have an interest in forecasting-related  information. If you do not wish to receive future informational emails  from RER, reply to this message and type UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


I have executed this and returned to Anne.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bennick, Kimberlee
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Colwell, Wes; Ducote, James; Gottlob, Edward; Gray, Barbara; McKay, James; Martin, Thomas A.; Schwieger, Jim; CharlesThompson/HOU/EES@EES; Zivley, Jill T.
Cc:	Koehler, Anne
Subject:	URGENT RESPONSE REQUIRED

	Per Anne Koehler's memo dated 5/29/01, this is a reminder that the Knowledge Certificate is due today, May 31st,  no later than 12:00 noon.  Please execute this certificate and return to Anne's attention at EB 3839.
	If you have any questions, please contact  Anne at  x33448 or Barbara at  x36832.

Thank You,
Kim Bennick

----- Forwarded by Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2001 09:09 AM -----

	Anne C Koehler@ENRON Sent by: Carolyn George@ENRON 05/29/2001 06:26 PM 	   To: Nick Cocavessis/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/Enron@EnronXGate, Brian Redmond/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/Enron@EnronXGate, Charles Thompson/HOU/EES@EES, Jill T Zivley/Enron@EnronXGate  cc: Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, (bcc: Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT)  Subject: URGENT RESPONSE REQUIRED

	Attached hereto is the certificate that must be signed by each of you in connection with the sale of Houston Pipe Line Company to AEP.  As outlined in my earlier e-mail message to each of you, this certificate is your confirmation that you have reviewed the Disclosure Schedules to the Purchase and Sale Agreement and that you have notified Brian Redmond in writing of any additions or corrections that should be made prior to the Closing.  The certificate also confirms that you have provided relevant portions of the Disclosure Schedules to the Key Employees listed on Schedule II and asked them to also notify Brian Redmond of any additions that are required.

	Please execute this certificate where indicated below and return it to Anne Koehler no later than Thursday, May 31, at 12:00 noon.  If you have any questions, please contact Anne Koehler at #33448 or Barbara Gray at #36832.

 << File: Knowledge CERTIFICATE.doc >> 				 << File: SCHEDULE II.doc >>

Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3839
713-853-3448


FYI

Ken Lay faxed this letter to Gov. Davis today.

If I left anyone off the list, please for this to them.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/20/2000 12:56 PM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	12/20/2000 11:22 AM

		 To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis letter


In addition:  expert clauses - which ones need to be changed, when and why -
what are reversals and why we use them - how to check physical prompt month
value for potential errors - how to calculate physical prompt month value -
checking the OA Flash tab.  I am sure there are some others.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
09:21 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           11/17/2000 09:19 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Class

Topics should include:  NX3 roll-off, the curveshift associate with basis NX3
roll-off and where it will show up on the p&l, what days we will roll in
index - the percentages, how to adjust percentages for fixed priced prompt
month positions, when to bring in prompt month value, how to put liquidations
in the physical P&L, how to roll the physical and financial p&l's, etc.

Any suggestions?

Dave

	From:  William Kelly                           11/17/2000 08:59 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Class

Our next class will combine EOM bench/NGP&L and P&L procedures.  We will hold
the class Tuesday @ 9:30 and combine both groups 1&2 for one class.  Jeff
would like to go over the bench and NGP&L process for 45 minutes or so, and
the rest of the class will be handled by Dave and Kam.  I will leave it to
you 2 to decide who will talk about what.  Lets get together on Monday to
brainstorm.

WK


The nom for KCS Resources (deal # 125822) at meter # 9658 has been revised
from 7,129 to 5,500.

Bob


Lending from El Paso for Friday and Saturday....

STWBOM and STSW are each short 25 mw on peak at Palo. Day ahead sales were made at $39.50. Purchase to cover the short positions. Sell back to El Paso @ $0. Reduce purchase prices in the following deals to $2 to cover El Paso's service fee.....

745958 - STWBOM buys EPE
	 On Peak/PV
	 25 mw @ $39.50
					} Reduce these purchase to $2
745989 - STSW buys EPE
	 On Peak/PV
	 25 mw @ $39.50

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thanks,
Kate


We have received the following EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreements:

Pilot Power Group, Inc. as agent for Callaway Golf Company 7/16/2001
Holnam, Inc. 6/28/01
NRG Power Marketing, Inc. 6/29/01

Copies will be given to Legal and Credit.


Vince:

I sent you itinerary to her, but did not send a photo or the handouts.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000
01:26 PM ---------------------------

"Dawn Scovill" <dawn@perfectmeeting.com> on 02/29/2000 09:20:48 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Upcoming Energy Conference - Kaminski Requirements

Good morning, Shirley!  I'm missing some things from Mr. Kaminski w/ regard
to
his presentation in Miami in a few weeks.  At your earliest convenience,
could you please forward the following:

* PR Photo - either electronic or I'll scan & return
* Handouts - either electronic or mail clean copy to the address below
* Copy of his flight itinerary, so we know when to expect him

All the contact info you need is as follows:

Dawn Scovill, Conference Coordinator
"Powerful New Ideas 2000"
PMB #216, 2480 S. Congress Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL  33406
Phone (561) 439-7682 - Fax (561) 439-7055 - Email dawn@perfectmeeting.com

I would really appreciate your prompt attention - I'm working toward getting
the room set-ups & conference book finalized.  Thanks for your help.  Look
forward to a great conference!!

Dawn
************************************************
FROM:  Dawn Scovill, Event Coordinator
DESIGNS Event Consulting
dawn@perfectmeeting.com


I sent the summary below to Greg yesterday, but want to reconfirm with everyone today - particularly the contract numbers.  The highlighted columns represent those I don't feel are accurate at this point.   I will be meeting individually with everyone to review their spreadsheets one more time and begin discussing the process which now is to start Wednesday.  Below is the draft summary I have at this point - the contractor numbers are the ones in particular I need to get verified.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pickering, Mark
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Piper, Greg; Barnard, Marla
Cc:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: ENW Summary

Havent seen the summary.

Mark Pickering
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg
Sent:	26 November 2001 08:24
To:	Barnard, Marla
Cc:	Pickering, Mark; Beck, Sally
Subject:	RE: ENW Summary

Has everyone named on this list approved/confirmed the numbers by their name?

Thanks.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 5:49 PM
To:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	ENW Summary

Below is the email copy of the ENW summary.  The highlighted areas indicated follow-up needed to ensure appropriate contractor numbers.

 << File: ENWsummary4.xls >>


We would like for everyone to please verify again that you have access to
both the following environments:

Sybase Stage:
Path : Stage Applications / Unify / Unify Gas-Power Stage
Server: SYB Offset GAS Stage
Password:  if yours does not work try houston

Sybase Stage:
Path : Stage Applications / Unify / Unify Gas-Power MSSQL2K Stage
Server: Unify2k Stage Gas
Password:  if yours does not work try houston

If you can not access either of these environments please let me know.
Georgia Ward
ENW - Development Support - QA
(713)853-9974


I would like to be the contact for Edison Marketing & Trading.  Please let me know if this is okay.

Thanks


We are one @enron.com!

Please be aware of the following senders were automatically notified to (a).
stop sending internet mail to your @ect.enron.com address and to (b). send
future internet communications to Tana.Jones@enron.com :

janetgj@erols.com

REMINDER :
Your @ect.enron.com address should not be used any longer and will be
deactivated soon.  So please make sure these contacts switch to your new
@enron.com address.  If you have subscribed to mailing lists, please make
sure to update your addresses there as well.
AND
Your shortname@enron.com address (i.e. jsmith@enron.com) will continue to
work, even though your formal address is longname@enron.com (i.e.
john.smith@enron.com)

Please do not reply to this message as it was automatically generated.


Attached is Thursday's Board Meeting Agenda.

 - agenda127.doc


--
[Forney, John M.]

It appears that Ercot is reversing their interpretation.   We still need to dispute/collect for OOMC payments and also file under OOME heat rate provisions for all of the times that we ran when we were under OOMC.
Does this make sense?

JMF

 ---Original Message-----
From: Twiggs, Thane
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Forney, John M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Portz, David
Cc: Yeung, Charles
Subject: FW: OOMC/OOME

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: "Saathoff, Kent" <KSaathoff@ercot.com>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 2:58 PM
To: Twiggs, Thane
Cc: Walker, Mark; Adams, John
Subject: RE: OOMC/OOME

Thane,

There must be some miscommunication.  I just talked with John and he

knows that an OOME instruction is necessary to get energy from OOMC

capacity.  It is not required by the protocols to bid in to balancing

market as is Replacement.  That causes us some operation problems and we

may ask for that requirement to be applied to OOMC as well.

Kent

-----Original Message-----

From: Twiggs, Thane

Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:59 PM

To: Saathoff, Kent

Cc: Walker, Mark

Subject: OOMC/OOME

Importance: High

I have a follow up question on our discussion at the TAC meeting last

week.  As we discussed, an OOMC instruction for hours 0-24 at 50MW would

for example require a unit to be prepared to provide the 50MW, but not

to actually provide the energy.  Another unit specific instruction or

OOME would be required for the unit to actually run at 50MW.

As recent as this morning, we were told that ERCOT would provide us an

OOME instruction when they want us to run after an OOMC instruction.

However, they also said that we were operating outside the protocols due

to John Adams' interpretation that when we receive an OOMC for a certain

time period at a certain level we should be generating.

We need immediate clarification on this issue.

**********************************************************************

This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of

the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure

by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient

(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender

or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and

delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments

hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not

create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron

Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other

party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by

estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************