We ahave not initiated a 24/7 gas product yet but are creating the
capabilities to launch at some point in the near future

From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 10:49 AM
To: Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Rick Buy Report Tomorrow--Your comments needed

I received this email and they are inquiring as to the new gas 24/7
electronic trading.  Has this taken off?  Who is managing it and are there
any positions associated with it?

Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tongo, Esther
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:29 PM
To: Hayden, Frank;
Cc:
Subject: Rick Buy Report Tomorrow--Your comments needed

The weekly Rick Buy update this week is on Thursday morning, so we will
report trading results as of and for the 5 days ended Tuesday, March 20th.
Please prepare comments on your area's positions and P/L - one to two
sentences - and e-mail them to me, with a copy to Cassandra Schultz, Veronica
Valdez and Matthew Adams, no later than noon, Houston time, Wednesday, March
21st (Tomorrow).

Those of you who have sub-limits not reflected on the consolidated DPR
(George in Global Products), and also the new gas 24/7 trader, please provide
trading results on those as well, including the 5-day and YTD P/L and current
NOP and VaR on George (Products EOL trading) - and also on _____ whatever
we're calling the EOL NA Gas auto trader.

Thank you,

Esther
x52456


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
01:14 PM ---------------------------

Robin Rodrigue
01/17/2000 02:55 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deferrals


we did not

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:35 AM
To:	Halstead, Lia; Collins, Joann
Subject:	Iroq/Tenn on Nov 13th

On Nov 13th, I sold 2700 dth to Black Hills in Tenn Z6 for the 13th.  I bought the gas from Hodge on CNG.  I need to know where the gas is if it didn't get delivered to Tenn.  The deal ticket shows that I changed added the deal at 8:50 am.  The volumes must have been in Sitara because Sitara shows Joann changing the volume from 14085 to 11348 on the 14th?  Then it shows me changing the volume back on the 14th.

Lia, would you see if we even nominated the intraday on the 13th to Black Hills?

thanks


got it!!!!!


Steve:  I want to thank you for recently creating the new Environment Health
& Safety division.  I think the reorganization and dedicated focus will
benefit the entire company.  I know that in the past I was often critical of
the previous situation, and while I didn't necessarily enjoy complaining
about it I thought it was important to show you the inefficiencies of what we
were experiencing.

But what a difference Mike has made!  In just a few weeks he has met on an
individual and group basis with key people involved in "environmental"
issues.  He appears organized, and is doing a great job at sifting through
the issues and prioritizing them.  He seems genuinley interested in working
with us as a team to develop goals and is enthusiastic and supportive of our
ideas and suggestions.

We had a Clean Air Act meeting in DC this week which was well attended by our
commercial people.  The Environment Health & Safety Council also met
yesterday and I think finally, this group will do more than just talk.
Everyone was very excited at the end of the day.

Having said all of that, I also want to share some news with you.  Ed
Baughman and Greg Woulfe asked me to join the emissions desk and yesterday I
accepted the mid-marketer position which will report to Ed.  The timing is a
little ironic, given the changes you just implemented but I am looking
forward to some much-needed commercial experience.

Without getting too sentimental, I want you to know that I have really
enjoyed working for you and Rick.  I had no idea what I was getting myself
into three years ago but it has turned out to be a very positive experience.
Both of you are the architects of a valuable, powerful and exciting Govt.
Affairs group.  What I will remember and appreciate most is the diverse,
talented and respectful group of individuals that you have hired these past
few years.  Everyone has been a pleasure to work with.  But most of all, you
and Rick have challenged me, encouraged me and given me the freedom to learn
about an industry that I knew nothing about  three years ago.  Thank you for
taking a chance on me and making me a part of Enron.

I know that I will be equally challenged as a mid-marketer and hopefully, if
I crater, you and Rick will let me move back home.  Thanks again for
everything.


Amanda,

Under the Power table in the Plant Outages folder on the fundy website, we have a link for California ISO outages.  Please change the link to point to the file called "pge_ISO_Outages.htm" in the testing folder instead of the existing file.  Thanks.

Mat


You don't ever need to sell to me.
I'll let you know progress as we move forward.


these are 50 mw - they've been changed.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/15/2001 11:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb

do you know that status?

Kerri Thompson
02/14/2001 03:29 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

523212
523213

broker has 50 mws on both


Congratulations!  You've helped make Enron one of America's elite
corporations.  We had a stunning performance in 2000, and, as a result, Enron
now ranks No. 7 on the Fortune 500, up from No. 18 last year.

The Fortune ranking is based on revenues of the nation's largest companies.
Last year, propelled by an enormous increase in volumes on EnronOnline, we
topped the $100 billion mark.  We expect to continue growing and climbing on
the Fortune 500 list.  This amazing growth is part of the reason we have
developed a new vision for Enron: to become The World,s Leading Company.
With your continued dedication and creative performance, we can realize
another year of stellar performance and will surely achieve this latest and
most compelling vision.

The Fortune 500 issue will be on newsstands April 16, however, you can read
about it now at www.fortune.com.


Hey, Jean.  Man, who don't you know???  Anyway, I'm sorry to bug you, but I'd like to try to get a meeting with Ms Doll ASAP.  If there's anyway that we can manage that, I'd, of course, be eternally indebted.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryall, Jean
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:46 PM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Do you know Laura Doll?

Yes, I have known her for quite some time.  She is the one who recommended me to Korn Ferry for the job that I have at Enron.  I will be happy to make the introduction.  Shall I make arrangements for a meeting in Pebble Beach???

I'll give her a call when you say the word...Jean

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Sun 10/7/2001 9:48 AM
To: Ryall, Jean
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Do you know Laura Doll?

Jean --

Laura Doll has been appointed head of the CA Power Authority.  Do you know her?  It would be good to have an introduction for Jeff Dasovich.

Jim


There are clearly a large number of people who need to know what is happening
on the integration of the MG metals business and a large number of fluid
teams working on different aspects of the project; however, most issues
related to the integration process will only be of interest to a subset of
the people involved.

We currently have two main forums for information sharing available to
members of the integration team:

The weekly newsletter produced by Fiona Grant in PR, which from 30 June
onwards will be sent to EEL management and the heads of those departments
represented on the Integration Team.
A weekly meeting on Friday mornings from 8am to 9am in NW1006, which has been
put in place to provide team leaders with an opportunity to update the entire
integration team on their top two or three issues for the past and/or coming
week.

For now, I expect the weekly update and the weekly meetings to meet the
information needs of the integration team.  If you feel this is not adequate,
then let either myself or Fiona Grant know and we'll do a re-think on the
subject.

To this end, and in the interests of ensuring that we conclude our discussion
in the allotted time, the following are a few organisational points I would
like everyone to bear in mind when attending the Friday morning meeting:

Attendees should distinguish between presenters and audience at the weekly
meeting.
Presenters should attend if at all possible and, in the event they are unable
to attend, should nominate a replacement for the meeting (replacements should
be notified to Esther Gerratt in advance of the  Friday morning meeting if
possible).

For the time being, presenters and their designated areas are:

- Eric Gadd  Commercial and Acquisition progress
- Amita Gosalia  EOL
- Justin Boyd  Legal
- Toby Knight  Premises
- Barry Sangster  IT infrastructure
- Bob Campbell  IT applications
- Richard Sage  Middle and Back Offices and Project Management
- Lloyd Fleming  RAC
- Tim Davies  Credit
- Anne Edgley  Finance
- Anne Hicks  Cash Management
- Janine Juggins  Tax
- Andrea Kerch  US GAAP and Due diligence
- Nigel Sellens  HR
- Fiona Grant  PR
- Bruce Garner  Business Development

As  this is intended to be an "update"-only meeting, any unresolved
substantive issues are to be taken off-line and the resolution reported the
following week.
Lastly, I would request that presenters focus on communicating, in an
efficient manner, things which affect other functions within the integration
process.  Doing so will assit other presenters in relaying the information
presented at the meeting to other personnel in their respective areas.

I hope you find this useful.   We want to keep the information flowing as we
continue the integration process, but at the same time we need to make sure
we use our time wisely and efficiently.

Regards,
Eric


CASHOUT
Please add the following fees for Feb. 2000:

FEE TYPE:
Natural Gas
Physical Forward
Penalty for Over/ Under take

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,008.87 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$519.73 Dollars Due Duke

Thanks- Katherine


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076513&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076513
Request Create Date : 11/19/01 8:37:30 AM
Requested For       : scott.tackett@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central Edit Risk Analytics
Resource Type       : Applications


Please disregard the confirm attached below. Per ongoing conversations, they
now want for us to create a confirm that allows them to add or delete shares
at any time without having to create a new confirm for any new trade. They
expect the volume of trades will increase in the near future. I will revise
the confirmation to include language to ths effect for your review. I will
send it to you shortly. I would like to meet with you along with Aneela
Charania, who is the transaction, to ensure  the confirm captures what is
intended. Once you receive the revised confirm I will call Kaye to schedule a
meeting with you.

Thanks for your patience.

Jorge
---------------------- Forwarded by Jorge A Garcia/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001
10:42 AM ---------------------------

Jorge A Garcia
03/28/2001 09:52 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Equity Swap ISDA Confirmation

Good Morning Sara,

Thank you again for reviewing the Equity Swap ISDA Confirmation the other
day. They now want to capture the trades in question as a basket equity swap.
I have modified the confirmation to accommodate the basket and included Annex
I. Please review and advise if any changes should be made.

Thanks!

Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Management
Enron Global Markets LLC
713/853-5596


CERA Alert: December 15, 2000

Title: Refined Products Line--North American Markets
CERA Knowledge Areas: Refined Products

US Margin Highlights
* Responding to falling apparent demand and rising primary inventory levels,
US Gulf Coast unleaded gasoline margins versus WTI fell by $2.26 per barrel
to average $1.45 per barrel during November. Gasoline margins have returned
to a historically normal range after spending the summer of 2000 at
exceptionally high values. CERA expects gasoline margins to WTI to average
$2.75 per barrel during the first quarter of the New Year, $1.16 per barrel
lower than this year's first quarter average.

* High sulfur No. 2 fuel oil differentials with WTI dropped slightly,
averaging $5.97 per barrel in November. Despite the drop of $0.37 per barrel
from October's average, fuel oil differentials remain at unprecedented
values-$4.20 per barrel higher than a year ago and $3.46 per barrel greater
that the previous five-year average. For the first quarter of 2001, CERA
anticipates distillate margins to moderate somewhat but remain at a record
high level of $4.75 per barrel in the first quarter.

* Jet/kerosene differentials versus WTI rose $0.63 per barrel from the
October average, reaching a whopping $8.59 per barrel in November. In
correspondence with the distillate market, jet/kerosene margins are at
historically high levels and receiving support from relatively tight
fundamentals. CERA expects jet/kerosene margins to moderate somewhat in the
first quarter in response to seasonal weakening of demand following the
holiday travel season but to remain exceptionally strong at an average of
$5.75 per barrel.

* Margins for US Gulf Coast 1% sulfur residual fuel dropped by $2.15 per
barrel, reaching $3.99 per barrel below WTI during November. Despite the
recent widening of differentials, CERA expects soaring natural gas prices to
support relatively narrow residual fuel differentials throughout the winter
months. Residual fuel differentials are expected to average $2.50 per barrel
below WTI during the first quarter of next year, at the high end of the
historical range.

US Demand Highlights
* Apparent demand for unleaded gasoline fell seasonally by about 0.5 million
barrels per day (mbd) from the October level, reaching 8.36 mbd for the four
weeks ending December 8. Demand is averaging less than 1 percent below last
year largely because Y2K concerns helped inflate December demand a year ago.
CERA anticipates gasoline demand to continue to decline seasonally as colder
temperatures arrive, averaging 8.08 mbd during the first quarter of 2001.

* Reported distillate apparent demand remains exceptionally strong at 3.94
mbd for the four weeks ending December 8, over 7 percent greater than this
time last year. This represents a slight increase of about 0.05 million
barrels (mb) from the end-October level of 3.90 mb, but still a record high
level for early December. With support from low home heating oil inventories,
particularly in the Northeast, distillate demand has been very strong during
the fall of 2000. CERA expects demand to remain strong in the coming winter
months, averaging 3.79 mb during the first quarter of next year.

* Apparent demand for jet fuel declined by 5 percent from the October level
to reach 1.68 mbd for the four weeks ending December 8. Despite the decline,
apparent jet fuel demand is over 1 percent above the year-ago level. The
relative strength of jet fuel reported demand continues to parallel
distillate demand strength with support coming from the use of jet fuel to
help mitigate the tight distillate market fundamentals. CERA expects the
demand for jet fuel to average 1.81 mb during the fourth quarter.

* Reported demand for residual fuel dropped to 0.87 mbd for the four weeks
ending December 8, a decline of about 0.09 mbd from the October average and a
slight increase over the November level. Demand for residual fuel is
currently 11 percent greater than last year, and surging natural gas prices
are expected to result in continued strong residual fuel demand throughout
the winter. Residual fuel demand is expected to remain in the 0.85 to 0.9 mbd
range during the first quarter of 2001.

US Inventory Highlights
* Primary inventories of unleaded gasoline rose to 196.5 mb, increasing
almost 10 mb from the end-October value. Responding to rising stock levels
and declining apparent demand, forward supply coverage of gasoline climbed to
23.5 days for the four weeks ending December 8. Forward supply is 2.5 percent
below last year's level at this time of year and at its lowest level in the
past eight years-although CERA still believes coverage is currently
sufficient for the level of demand expected this winter. However, CERA is
looking cautiously at the implications of high distillate refinery yields and
production because of the possibility of low gasoline inventories at the
start of the driving season in the second quarter of next year.

* Distillate inventory coverage has remained about level since the end of
October at 29.2 days of forward supply for the four weeks ending December 8.
Despite record high apparent demand, strong refinery production levels helped
boost primary distillate inventories slightly, to 115.3 mb for this period.
Primary stocks are 16 percent below last year's level at this time and at
their lowest historical level ever. Although stocks are low, CERA does not
anticipate shortages to occur this winter. Assuming normally cold weather,
refinery production and net imports are expected to be capable of meeting
demand requirements-albeit at a high price.

* Jet fuel inventory coverage crept upward by about 1 day of coverage, to
reach 25.7 days of forward supply for the four weeks ending December 8. This
moves jet fuel coverage above the 23.5 to 25 days' supply range that it had
been in for the past four months. The rise of just under 1 day in forward
supply was mainly a response to a decline in apparent demand. Jet inventories
and coverage are expected to become tighter in the coming weeks as the pull
from tight distillate markets strengthen, but supplies are expected to be
adequate for the winter.

* Inventory coverage of residual fuel rose by almost 4 days of forward supply
from October, reaching 41.7 days of forward supply during the four weeks
ending December 8. The increase in coverage was a temporary response to a
drop in demand and an increase in stocks. With demand expected to strengthen
because of colder weather and high gas prices, CERA looks for inventories and
coverage gradually to decline in the coming weeks.

**end**

This CERA Alert will be available in PDF format within 24 hours.

**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


From a credit perspective, should we be in front of any other debt issue of
CWR related to the California Procurement Adjustment, and have a dedicated
slice of the PUC approved rates, this would, from a practical standpoint be
at the top of credit claims.   Since repayment of the debt at the utilities
is dependant on net cash flows (from rate payers), we functionally prime them
as well.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/09/2001 10:24 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, mpalmer@enron.com,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: CDWR Credit Proposal

FYI.  Calger is in active talks with Freeman and DWR lawyers about the offer
letter we submitted on Tuesday.  Freeman's very anxious to do a deal for 200
MWs from the West Desk and then start talking about a deal for power from
Parquet's Pastoria plant.  Credit is of course the issue and Calger's told
them that unless the credit issue is bulletproof it's not going to work.  See
Chris' comments below.  It looks like progress is being made, but the details
will make it or break it.  Any thoughts?  Might make sense to discuss on the
call.  Please forward along to others.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:22 AM -----

	Christopher F Calger@ECT
	02/08/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: CDWR Credit Proposal

CDWR is proposing to all potential suppliers the following security package
for new PPA's:

1) Irrevocable PUC Order / Agreement that "locks in the revenue stream" for
CDWR to cover the PPA costs.

2) PPA covenant that the power supplier has payment priority over any debt,
including the contemplated debt issue
  - the concept is that the supply is the operating cost and any debt would
be subordinate

3) PPA Covenant that their is a uniform package to all suppliers; no more
favorable terms or priority to ayone, no L/C, etc.

Subject to definitive language, CDWR is trying to get people to buy into this
general plan.  What do people think?  Please try to shoot holes in this.
Please forward to the appropriate legal, regulatory and credit folks to air
this out.

Thanks,

Chris


John:  Marie gave me your message.  I will call you after lunch to discuss
Total.  The Marval firm in B.A. is ENA's outside legal counsel for
derivatives advice.  ENA lawyers hire and speak with ENA's outside counsel.
I have spoken with our outside counsel on derivatives issues in Argentina.  I
will discuss this further with you when you and I have our conversation.
Sara


The daily California Crisis call is being rescheduled for tomorrow only!  See
details below:

(bolded items indicate a change)

Date:  Friday, February 2

Time:  9:00am (CST)

Number: 1-800-998-2462
  passcode 4912753

Location: EB47C1

Thanks and please feel free to call me if you have questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


Tyrell, this confirm is still incorrect on Page 2 according to the file you
sent me... at the top of Page 2, when you print it out it is still showing...
JM Huber. . I told Mark this, It was supposed to be fixed.

You need to get it fixed, put in the deal date and get a new copy out to
AEC... It is unacceptable that we sent this out again... in error !!!

BT


I spoke with Karen Lindley about volume not being allocated.  She said that
she passed it on to Fred Boas.

Daren J Farmer
02/21/2001 04:46 PM
To: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/EES@EES, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter 5892

I have done deals with John at this point.  Why are we not being allocated
any volume?

D

Charlene Richmond
02/21/2001 02:59 PM
To: Fred Boas/HOU/EES@EES, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meter 5892

I am getting several phone calls from Alpine Resources demanding to be paid
for meter 5892 and there is nothing there to be paid.

The person name doing the requesting is John Childers and he said that he
spoke to Daren Farmer.  He is looking for 859 mmbtu's for December, 2000 and
3,251 mmbtu's for January 2001 .  This is on the Katy Gas Unit.  If anyone
would like to talk to John his phone number is 281-646-0232

Charlene
X31539


I have a 300 meeting, so I'm sending this as is so that David can print a
copy.  I have not yet integrated all of his changes, although I have dealt
with the profit/savings and QSE.

Is the scope of scheduling services in the exhibit the same as the Scheduling
(aka QSE) stuff?

Later,

Kay

ps Reagan has the latest exhibits.


For your review.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/08/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------

Jeff Blumenthal@ECT
06/06/2000 06:44 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc
Sabine/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

Kay and Brian,

In reply to Tim Lederach's e-mail below to Jeff Smith on June 6th, I have the
following comments:

1.  Regarding Tim's addition of the second and third sentences to my original
suggested language, it appears that there may be a misunderstanding.  Under
Mexican tax law, EEIM would be obligated to withhold tax on any payments it
makes to GE that are subject to Mexican withholding tax.  EEIM would submit
such amounts directly to the Mexican tax authorities and, in exchange, would
receive an official receipt (Official Form 37-A) that it could then forward
to GE.  It appears that Tim wants to ensure that GE obtains a copy of the
official receipt so that GE can claim a foreign tax credit on its U.S. income
tax return for any withholding tax to which payments it receives are subject
under Mexican tax law.  Tim's suggested additional language therefore needs
to modified to reflect that EEIM would pay the tax and could then provide GE
with the receipt.  I'd be glad to visit with Tim to discuss this matter.

2.  The language that I have proposed should be inserted in both the onshore
agreement and the offshore agreement.  Tim is proposing that it be inserted
(with his additional suggestions) only in the onshore agreement.

Please contact me at ext. 35777 if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Jeff

	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           06/06/2000 06:09 PM

To: Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 06:08
PM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/06/2000 06:08:59 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, tim.lederach@ps.ge.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, karl.siverling@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

Kay,
See the proposed wording, below.  This is the only contract text issue I am
aware of.
Other than the items mentioned in my e-mail of June 1st/2nd (on the
consolidation agreement) and finalization of the "letter agreement" (you got
my fax), we are there.
Implied in the above, is that at this point I think the split agreement
approach would get us to closure faster.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance)
Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:12 PM
To:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
Subject:   RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

I have no problem with their proposed addition as it applies to the onshore
contract.  However, I would recommend modifying it as follows:

      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.  Seller agrees to
provide Purchaser with an original tax receipt, in Seller's name, indicating
remittance by the Purchaser of the amounts withheld.  Failure to provide
this receipt within a reasonable period of time will result in the amount
withheld becoming payable to the Seller.
Regards

Tim Lederach
GEPS Taxes

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:43 PM
      To:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance)
      Subject:   FW: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)
      Importance:   High

      Tim,
      Enron wants to add this to the end of Clause 5.2.2.
Attached is the latest version of the On-Shore Contract for reference.
      Please let me know your opinion.
      We can talk to Enron about this if appropriate.
      Thanks,
      Jeff Smith
          << File: VITRO5-on-r1b.wpd >>

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]>
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:23 PM
      To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
      Subject:   language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.


Hey Vince!
Here is a picture of Howard Lin and picture of Lawrence (the guy I spoke to
you about over the telephone) and his new resume.
I will call Alec tonight in London to let him know that you sent the "other
Howard" (Howard Haughton over to Enron UK).
Lawrence has Banking and Online experience with HSBC- he is being examined
only by one other company that I know of (Williams) that is my competitor. He
also went to the Chief Investment Officer of the San Diego Pension Fund (a
friend of mine). I don't think he is a "best fit"- but, If you like him- I'll
get him for you!
I have a great relationship with him.
OK!
Thanks,
Jeff Wesley

Ps- I kinda like Lawrence's "look", Vince.

ALWAYS HELD IN STRICT CONFIDENCE.
     Jeff Wesley
 949 813 2241 Hotline
347 487 8957 Voice/Fax US
  +44(845)3341644 UK

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *

 - howardlin.gif
 - Image002.jpg
 - LAWRENCEAGENT9498132241NEW.doc


Tanya,
          We have checked the RiskTrac system and
(1) The spreadoption, and other,  mappings in Risktrac are correct.  ie,
E1S1B has both power(PPP) and gas(NBP) and the deltas/gammas tie out.  The
LOLP and SMP mappings all tie out.
(2) However, the UK power in Risktrac has 25TWH more of Power.  This has
something to do with the Enpower-Risktrac communication.
(3) UK-Gas positions tie out in aggregate (off by a single BcF)

For VaR discrepancies, other than positions, the following will contrbute
(1) In Risktrac power is mapped to R4 (Cinergy) while in the spreadsheet it
is US-NG.
(2) Gas-Power and EFA-EFA correlations are different.

Matthew is coordinating with Oliver and London IT to resolve the position
issues.

Naveen

Tanya Tamarchenko@ECT
01/03/2001 02:09 PM
To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: UK portfolios and books setup in RisktRac

Naveen and Matthew,
I started looking systematically through UK positions and corresponding VAR
numbers in the RisckRac.
I found a few inconsistencies so far.

1. The portfolio E1SB1-NBP has a book E1SB1 under it.  The sum of delta
positions for this book is
239,021,655, the sum of gamma positions is -211,031,450. VAR for the
portfolio E1SB1-NBP is zero.

The same refers to a few other portfolios, for example E1SB2-NBP, E1SB3-NBP,
E2XX1-NBP.

2. The portfolio E1SBP1-PPP also has the book E1SB1 under it. This book
contains the positions on PPPWD1
through PPPWD6 and PPPWE1 through PPPWE4.

The same refers to the other books, for example E1SB2.

This looks messy.  Can someone in RAC go over all the portfolios, all the
corresponding books and curves
in RisktRac and make sure they are set up properly?

Thank you,

Tanya.


I'll be happy to accomodate.  I can take you through Enron's view of how
markets overall are evolving and how we approach those markets.  I'd also
like to spend some time reviewing interstate transmission policy and how it
affects Western energy markets.

"Steve Reynolds" <SREYNO@state.wy.us> on 05/23/2001 09:40:11 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc: <sland@enron.com>

Subject: Wyoming Energy Commission subject

Steve, it was great to meet you and hear your remarks yesterday.  For the
speaking engagement next Wednesday, I would like you to focus upon the Enron
strategic model of virtual integration of market forces in the evolution of
energy development.  Wyoming represents a huge material resource base and the
commission is charged with the development and promotion of such.  But the
Governor's message is that we cannot see ourselves as producers and exporters
in the traditional sense.  We will continue to have the status of a colony if
we do not recognize the new dynamics of how these market places are
evolving.  If you set the stage with a presentation of Enron strategy, then
we will discuss how a state, with its agencies and auathority can play a role
in this evolution.  I have set your time for 45 minutes, which can include a
short Qand A period.  But your message can be as succint as you can make it
and get the point across.  You may have to present the Enron case a number of
different ways, but the Governor will give you latitude to make the point.
You will be welcome to participate in a following panel which will address
role playing by the state and the commission.  Plan to join us for lunch.  If
you need more detail, let me know.  Thanks!  Stephen


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:09 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/21/2001 10:23 AM

		 To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Craig H
Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike M Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
mpalmer@enron.com, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES,
skean@enron.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, fvickers@enron.com,
Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 10:21 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	01/21/2001 05:42 AM
	Please respond to "Steven Kelly"

		 To: "Wayne Kawamoto" <wkawamoto@wm.com>, "Ward Scobee"
<wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Thomas Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Ted Cortopassi"
<TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve
Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Ross Ain" <ain@worldnet.att.net>, "Robert
Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Rich Dyer" <Rich_dyer@ogden-energy.com>, "Pete
Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Paul
Wood" <paul_wood@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Milt Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lucian Fox"
<lucian_fox@ogden-energy.com>, "Ken Salvagno" <kbssac@aol.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jack Pigott"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd" <hap.boyd@enron.com>, "Frank Misseldine"
<fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Ed
Maddox" <emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Doug Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>, "Doug Fernley"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Bob
Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>,
"Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson" <wcarlson@wm.com>, "Bill
Adams" <sangorgon@aol.com>, "Alex Sugaoka" <Alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "Tom
Hartman" <Tom.Hartman@fpl.com>, "Eric Edstrom" <edstrome@epenergy.com>,
"Scott Frier" <sfrier@kjcsolar.com>, "William Hall"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Scott
Noll" <snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Rob Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>,
"Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>,
"Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Carol Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Andy
Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Diane
Fellman" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>
		 Subject: IMPORTANT CONFERENCE CALL ON QF/SRAC MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR 12:30
P.M. (NOONISH) ON SUNDAY, JAN.  21

An important conference call is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. (PST) on Sunday,
Today, Jan 21 to discuss the status of legislative meetings on QF/SRAC
matters.

Call-In number is            888-422-7124
Particpant Code is          111756

Status Report
After a marathon 12 hour meeting with Assemplyman Keeley, Senator Battin, QF
Parties, and SCE, a Keeley sponsored "deal" was proposed at 3:30 a.m. this
morning.  The crux of the deal is as follows:

For renewables and non-gas fired QF, essentially ...

7.8 cents/kwh for delivered power for 5 years ["all in", i.e. includes
capacity and energy]
1.0 on losses
no 'clawback' for wind resources which may have failed to meet fixed capacity
obligations in the past
Applies "going forward" (presumedly Feb. 1)

For gas-fired QFs...

7.8 cents/kwh for five years, assuming gas is $5.60;  payment will
increase/decrease tied to gas  (this assumes an IER of 9821)
1.0 on line losses
applies "going forward"
Caacity True-up and "forbearance" were not addressed.  Credit worthiness will
be address in the technical conference scheduled for later today (Sunday).
This program will require in part legislative blessing and direction,
followed by CPUC approval of individual contract amendments.  This is
essentially the PG&E/QF "deal" for the gas guys.  For the renewables, it is
more of a fixed payment approach.

A "Technical Conference" is scheduled for Sunday (today) in Sacramento to
work out some of the implementing details.


How about 11 am CST?  I forgot that I have an 11:30 on Monday.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tracy Ngo
	04/25/2001 10:20 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: "Transfer" provision

How about the same time on Monday?  10am PST; 12 noon CST; 1 pm EST?

I'll put you guys down for 10am my time...unless I hear different.

Thanks,
Tracy

From: Sara Shackleton on 04/25/2001 07:55 AM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: "Transfer" provision

Tracy:  It's fine with me.  Let's schedule a time next week on Monday.  The
lawyers will be gone Wed - Fri next week.  Name a time.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 09:52 AM -----

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	04/24/2001 07:29 PM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: "Transfer" provision

I am prapring for a trip to Denver tomorrow.  Can we push this off until next
week.

Yair Yaish
Office of General Counsel
AEGM
2-7955

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:44 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: "Transfer" provision

Yair:

Tracy and I would like to discuss the "Transfer" issue with you tomorrow,
if possible.  We think this should be a short discussion (maybe 10
minutes).  How is 1 pm NY time, tomorrow Wednesday April 25?  This seems to
be the most convenient for both of us, but we will entertain times before 3
pm NY time.

Would you please email your response?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Appt @ 5:00 - leaving at 4:00
59 to Murphy Rd - to Highway 6
288 to Highway 6
281-499-6067


I have spoken with Mike and Ed and it appears that the morning of the 20th is
the best time to meet.? I will most likely be in NY on the 19th.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Colleen,

I didn't see the live-update of Gas Daily curves in your meeting notes.
Should we add it? Please advise.

Thanks

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sullivan, Colleen
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Zhiyong Wei/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Husain, Karima; Storey, Geoff
Cc: Stephen Stock/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Gossett, Jeffrey; Severson, Russ
Subject: REVISED MEETING NOTES

Please see the attached revision to the meeting notes.  You will see the
change indicated in RED under Issue #2, Gas Daily.  We want to put this item
on HOLD for now because there are more implications to this change that we
need to resolve before coding begins.  The focus for now should be on putting
physical positions in TDS--identifying all issues associated with it, resolve
questions on where/how to get the position data, what should be filtered,
design of the new screens, etc.

Also, for your information--from now on we will be including Jeff Gossett and
Russ Severson in our weekly meetings as I believe they can help tremendously
with position reporting and how we currently get information from Sitara,
CPR, ERMS & TAGG.  I will send you all an e-mail on Monday letting you know
the time and place of next week's meeting.  Normally I want to hold the
meetings on Wednesday afternoons; however--next week I may have to move it to
Tuesday.  I will let you know first thing Monday morning.  Let me know if you
have any questions or concerns.

 << File: IT-GT Meeting 3-7-01.doc >>


Sara, I just executed a long dated forward with UBS. They still have the
business entity registered as Enron Capital & Trade. Could you please update
them ? UBS can be reached at:
81-3-5208-7695 Masako Chiba

Sincerely,
Darren


If Delano is ramped down HE 7-10 and we buy to replace remember that we have to be below Delano's generation costs. We then split the upside with them. We might want to try to avoid HE 10 as it is a little risky. Keep it in mind
Leaf


See changes attached with one subtraction (Joe Step) and one addition (Doug Gilbert-Smith).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 3:36 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Promotion Justification

Kevin -

Please see attached.  I apologize for not being able to elaborate more......

Amy

 << File: Promotion Justification for East Power.doc >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000
05:36 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 05/14/2000 08:03:46 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto

Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (rly-ye02.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.199])
by air-ye02.mx.aol.com (v73.12) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:21 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:02 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id RAA16047 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id RAA03182 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA27377 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568DD.00794B9A ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:52 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568DD.00794A86.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:47 -0500
Subject: Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:07
PM ---------------------------

Phelim Boyle <pboyle@uwaterloo.ca> on 05/12/2000 03:47:59 PM

To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Amy Aldous <aaldous@watarts.uwaterloo.ca>,
      pconcessi@deloitte.com, ROSS Raymond -CMMRCL OPS
      <raymond.ross@ontariopowergeneration.com>
cc:
Subject:  Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto

 Vince
Thanks again for agreeing to speak at our conference.
It is attracting considerable interest. .

Is it possible for you to send us copies of your slides by May 18 to meet our
deadline for
preparing the material.? If you have? a related paper available that covers
some of the same material that would do instead but
naturally we would prefer the slides.

I would like to mention again the?? the pre-conference dinner at
7 pm on Sunday May 30 for the speakers
We hope very much you can be present

I was also hoping you would be available for the last? session of the day to
be
panel member
The provisional title? is
Managing Risk in Illiquid Markets
The chair is Pat Concessi of Deloitte and Touche
The panel last from 3.30 until 4.30 and we would like panel members should
speaker for
a few minutes and take questions from the floor.

In the meantime if you have any questions please let Amy or myself know

Sincerely
Phelim P Boyle

--
Phelim P Boyle
Director
Centre for Advanced Studies in Finance,
University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada N2L 3G1

Tel? 519 885 1211(6513)
Fax 519 888 7562


Given our limited corporate resources, can we cut the IT newsletter?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Lillian
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:54 AM
To:	DL-ETS IT Everyone; DL-ETS Newsletter Distribution
Subject:	ETS IT November Newsletter Now Available

Please visit the latest issue of the ETS IT newsletter at:

http://www.ets.enron.com/ITNewsletter/default.asp

Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Thomas A.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Vuittonet, Laura
Subject:	FW: Floor meeting tomorrow(11/13) at 2:30 p.m.

Please send to the rest of the Texas Desk.

Tom
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoppe, Tammie
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Shively, Hunter S.; Neal, Scott; Martin, Thomas A.; Arnold, John; Grigsby, Mike; Presto, Kevin M.; Black, Don; Duran, W. David; Gomez, Julie A.; Lagrasta, Fred; Irvin, Steve
Cc:	Rangel, Ina; Bates, Kimberly; Vuittonet, Laura; Hogan, Irena D.; Rode, Tina; Coleman, Venita; Young, Becky; Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Floor meeting tomorrow(11/13) at 2:30 p.m.

John and Louise will have a floor meeting tomorrow(11/13) at 2:30 p.m. at EB3221A.  Please forward this to your group(s).

Thanks!

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


---------------------- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on
08/21/2000 10:10 AM ---------------------------

"Michael Gagliardi" <mggagliardi@duke-energy.com> on 08/21/2000 07:25:59 AM

To:   DGagliardi@reliantenergy.com, David_Ricks@GSDM.com
cc:

Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #73

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael
Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on 08/21/2000 07:34 AM
---------------------------

TruOrange@aol.com on 08/20/2000 07:25:25 PM

To:   TruOrange@aol.com
cc:    (bcc: Michael Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC)
Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #73

True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service
Volume 8, Fax/E-Mail #73, Sunday, August 20, 2000
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
Phone
512-795-8536

Brown Says Offense Much Improved, Defense Very Solid

Coach Mack Brown said Sunday the Longhorns' offense should be much better
this season, and he said the defense should be his best since coming to
Texas.
Brown said the players showed up in great shape and have shown a lot of
enthusiasm in all of the early practices. He also said thd depth,
offensively
and defensively, will be better than it has been.
The offensive line is the main question mark, and Brown said flatly, "The
offensive line is much improved. There is a lot more cohesiveness. Most of
the guys were starting for the first time last year and they are much more
sure of what they need to do now that they have more experience."
He said guard Antwan Kirk-Hughes is the most improved offensive linemen,
but
he also said, "We feel like all five (offensive line starters) will be
quality
players."
The team appears to be thinner at guard than tackle on offense, but the
coaches have moved backup tackle Robbie Doane to guard. That is a sure sign
that they like the work of massive true freshman Lionel Garr at offensive
tackle. They want to have four tackles and four guards. With Leonard Davis
and Mike Williams starting at tackle and Cory Quye and Garr backing them up
and Kirk-Hughes and Derrick Dockery starting at guard and Doane and Tillman
Holloway backing them up, they get their desired two-deep. Broad also said
junior squadman Corey Bradford has been looking good at tackle. At center,
starter Matt Anderson is getting a strong challenge from Beau Baker.
Brown also has said a lot of true freshmen will play this year. "If we
think
they can help us win, they'll play," he said following a two-hour practice
session Sunday Morning. True freshman WR Roy Williams and redshirt freshman
WR Artie Ellis, both in the 6-3, 6-4 range, had outstanding practices.
Looking at the 21 freshmen, it appears likely that 14 will play. They are
Garr, WRs Roy Williams, B. J. Johnson, Sloan Thomas and Tony Jeffery, TE
Brock Edwards, DEs Adam Doiron and Kalen Thonton, DT Stevie Lee, CB Nathan
Vasher, LB Austin Sendlein, safety Phillip Geiggar, punter Justin Smith and
kicker Matt McFadden.  Brown has said he wants to use the two kickers, at
least in back-up roles, so they will have a little experience when they
take
over the two jobs next year.
TE Bo Scaife's season-ending knee injury has the coaches putting Edwards on
the fast track to get him ready to play quickly. TE coach Tim Brewster says
Edwards is picking up things very quickly. Brown said, "The thing  that Bo
gave us was great speed down the field. Brock Edwards looks pretty fast,
too,
and he's ahead of where Bo was last year because of Bo's knee." Scaife came
to Texas after undergoing surgery on his other knee.
The true freshmen who probably won't play, barring a rash of injuries at
their positions, are QB Chance Mock, RB Sneezy Beltran, FB Will Matthews,
OLs
Trey Bates and Jason Glynn,  and LBs Austin Sendlein and Rashad Thomas.
Mock,
as the third quarterback behind Chris Simms and Major Applewhite, will be
trained to be ready to play, but Brown said he hopes to redshirt him. He
has
been looking very good. Beltran and Matthews also look good, but the Horns
are deep at their positions. Brown also has said he hopes to redshirt some
offensive linemen, and Bates and Glynn are the likely candidates.
* * * *
Correction: Oh boy, when I mess up, I mess up. In last night's fax, I
quoted
a Texas coach as comparing Roy Williams favorably with Lovell Pinkney and
Mike Williams. Obviously, I meant Lovell Pinkney and Mike Adams. Sorry
about
that. Got my Mike's mixed up.
* * * *
RECRUITING NOTES: Texas continues to lead for the state's best DT, Tommie
Harris of Killeen Ellison; best LB Derrick Johnson of Waco; best safety,
Dewayne Brandon of Temple; best RB Cedric Benson of Midland Lee; best QB
Matt
Nordgren of Dallas Bishop Lynch, and best TE, James Moses of Galena Park
North Shore, , , The high school football season starts next week, and, for
the first time in several years, I will be able to scout five of the
state's
top players without driving very far. They are Harris, Johnson, Brandon, CB
Cedric Griffin of San Antonio Holmes (a UT commitment) and QB/Athlete Quan
Cosby of Mart.
* * * *
My next fax will be Monday, August 21.
* * * *
The True Orange Fax Service includes  at  least  99 faxes  a year and costs
$99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes  26 newsletters
and
is published weekly during football season and twice monthly during most of
the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both for $130 (or
$110
if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take the faxes and
newsletter
via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also  update my
900 number

- 1-900-288-8839
- frequently with recruiting news. My E-Mail
address is: truorange@aol.com


Skilling


Rob/Mark/Bruce -- I'm not copying you directly on these messages below as I
don't want others to think they have not been doing their job and I am
calling them on the carpet. I think the legal team has been doing exactly
what has been expected from them, but maybe some of our newer business people
haven't understood the need for India legal to communicate freely and often
directly to Houston legal. I'll take care of that.  But after my recent visit
to Houston, and discussions there with you and others, I just want
information to flow freely and often between India and Houston. So I'm trying
to make sure that happens by encouraging info flow below. If you ever feel
you need more, please let me know.

I'll also let you 3 decide how you want info to flow from the India legal
team up to Houston. You may wish to have them deal directly with just one of
you or all 3. Your call, and you can communicate this to the India legal team
as to how you want communication to occur.

Wade

---------------------- Forwarded by Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/22/2000 11:54 PM ---------------------------

	enron india

	From:  Wade Cline                           11/22/2000 11:54 PM

To: Paul Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Neil McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Re(2): 9FA Issues

Paul -- I'm all in favor of going after GE, but part of that is probably
emotions. But we will also never meet a tougher litigation opponent, so we
better be prepared and have thought through all the ramifications. I'm sure
you are doing this, but make sure you keep Rob, Mark and Bruce in the loop,
and any other people they might want you to keep involved.

In that regard, after several meetings in Houston on general DPC matters,
please ensure that you keep Rob, Mark and Bruce up to speed on all DPC legal
matters. We need to make sure the information flow is transparent and
seamless not only up the business side but also the legal side. This will
only become more important as we go into our 2001 challenges.

Thanks,
Wade

Neil McGregor
11/22/2000 01:43 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: James L Bouillion@ECT

Subject: Re: Re(2): 9FA Issues

For your info we have contacted Medway a plant in the UK which has had
similar compressor blade failures on the 9FA's. This problem seems to be a
"type fault" and along that line we have sounded out the Insurers and Medway
whether they would be interested in taking a joint action against GE on the
basis that the GT's GE has supplied are not fit for purpose. The response was
a resounding yes, with the insurers wanting to set up a meeting between the
affected parties. This was done on a confidential basis and I have not pulled
the trigger on setting this up. (Jim Boullion, the insurance contact was
David Way). Our legal advice is that it would be very difficult to take this
kind of action given the extent of the no consequentials language in the
contract, under NY law. However this point may be a reasonable Hammer over GE
if they cut up rough and give us a bad deal. I think a joint action in the
market could severely affect GE's sales position of the 9FA product range,
whether we have a strong case or not. Gordon Grimes and the litigation team
are tasked with trying to find us an angle on which to sue.

Further points to take note of below are:
Medway got stiffed by GE with the cost of repairs and extended warranty,
whereas we got these covered in our last deal.
The insurance market dried up in the UK on the insurability of these rotors
Final insurance costs rose 300% and their deductable went over 60 days (Ours
is currently 14 days! We negotiated it down from 45days last year on our
insurance renewal programme.
Insurabiltiy of the GT's, including phase 2, is going to be a challenge and
MSEB is going to resist paying any increase in premium. Insurance cost is a
pass through to MSEB.
We need to be cognisant of these facts when dealing with GE next week.
Neil
---------------------- Forwarded by Neil McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/22/2000 12:37 PM ---------------------------

V S Raman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/21/2000 03:50 PM
To: Neil McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc: Ken Blades/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, paul.kraske@enron.com

Subject: Re: Re(2): 9FA Issues

Medway has experienced two compressor failures, the first one on CT2 in
November 99 when an R4 tip broke off and resulted in a major compressor
failure. The rotor was replaced with their spare one. The second failure was
more recent in July 2000, on CT1, when five of the R2 blade tips broke off
and caused secondary damages to rows R11 and R13. In this case, though GE
advocated site repair of the rotor, the insurance company refused to accept
it. Medway had to send the rotor for refurbishment to the GE repair facility
before they could get reinsure this turbine.  The costs of repair were borne
by Medway and; all warranties had run out.

Both gas turbines had the old design of compressor blades. Subsequent to the
failure, robust compressor blades were installed in row 2-5 and 9-16 on both
compressors.

CT2 is running with the new compressor blades since December 99. A September
2000 CI and boroscope inspection on this unit revealed minor burring of R0
stage blades. CT1 is running with robust blades since October 2000.

Though Tim Sharp was a bit circumspect on commercial questions, he did
indicate that their insurance deductibles had gone over 60 days, with a
premium increase of about 300% and  the insurance market dried up in UK and
they had to get about 20% of the cover from the US.

Neil McGregor@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
21/11/2000 11:50 AM
To: V S Raman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc: Kenneth Lambert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
paul.kraske@enron.com, Ken Blades/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Re(2): 9FA Issues

Raman if you have not done this contact Medway immediately and swap notes.
Find out if it is the same problem as ours and find out what they did with GE
to resolve it commercially. Do this as fast as you can.
Neil

V S Raman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/21/2000 10:33 AM
To: Kenneth Lambert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil McGregor@ECT,
paul.kraske@enron.com, Ken Blades/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re(2): 9FA Issues

Please see below. Medway Power has problems in their insurance of 9FA rotors.
---------------------- Forwarded by V S Raman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 21/11/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

"Tim Sharp" <tsharp@aesc.com> on 20/11/2000 08:20:24 PM
To: V.S.Raman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re(2): 9FA Issues

V.S.Raman@enron.com writes:
>
>Tim
>
>Thanks for trying to get back to me. We had taken an two day outage early
>in November because of dispatch requirements and took the opportunity to
>inspect the compressor inlet and do a boroscopy. We noticed that several
>of
>the R1 blades had trailing edge missing. We also noticed small metal
>particles in the stage 9 extraction strainer. An analysis of this
>indicated
>that blade material. We opened up the machine and have mapped upward of
>200
>blades that are damaged. We are working with GE on arriving at a
>repair/replacement decision.
>
>This is the third incident at Dabhol and we are really concerned that even
>a robust rotor (GE now says that we have 5th generation rotors) the
>machine
>behaviour has not changed. We would like to discuss insurance strategies
>with a good insurance consultant in the UK. If you know of someone who can
>help, please let me know.
>
>Thanks a lot.
>
>regards
>
>
>
>
>"Tim Sharp" <tsharp@aesc.com> on 17/11/2000 07:55:36 PM
>
>To:   V.S.Raman@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  9FA Issues
>
>
>Mr Raman
>
>Reference your request to discuss 9FA compressor issues, I have tried to
>contact you on the number you gave, unsuccessfully.
>
>I understand that Babhol has had another compressor incident, your plant
>appear to have the same amount of luck as Medway!
>
>Please call or email.
>TEL 0044 1634 272222
>
>Regards
>
>Tim Sharp
>
Mr Raman

As you will be aware from the 9FA Users group, Medway had great difficulty
obtaining Insurance, due to our renewal coincided with the inspection of
CT1 compressor, once the rotor blade damage was identified, without
replacing the R2 through R5 (+ 17th stage fillet BBF) it was impossible to
re-insure CT1.

You must now be in a similar situation, self insure maybe the answer, a
lots the 9FA Users now appear to have gone this way.

The insurance broker AES uses is Aon Group Construction & Engineering

I have spoken to Philip Veale who is willing to discuss your situation
with you.

Contact Tel 0207 668 9347

Regards
>
>
Tim Sharp


ok


I haven't heard back from Dale.  Sheila and I have swapped voice mails.

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
02/28/2001 09:17 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Panda

Kay:

Relative to the Panda deal,

1.  What feedback have you received on the Portland legal question?

2.  What is the status of the GE breakout contract for the LV units?  Panda
has asked (twice) for this and I would like to give them a timeline for its
delivery.  We will need a day or two to redact the sensitive commercial data
before delivery to Panda.

3.  I will call Panda this morning and float the $250K exclusivity fee
concept.

4. Will the draft Letter Agreement be available today?  I have told Panda
that this document would come first with the Facility Agreement and LLC
Agreement to follow.

5. Stephen Thome is scheduled to be in Houston this afternoon.  I will bring
him up to speed.

Let me know on 1,2, and 4 above.

Thanks,
Fred


This is the last email I have on the issue of consequentials/LOL.  As I
recall, we have not agreed to the redaction of the carve out of the LOL for
gross negligence, but it is an important issue for GE.

Steve Swift wants to close out these issues.  Are we ready, or do we need
this for a swap for something?

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:57
AM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 10/04/2000 12:40:51 PM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
kay.mann@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ss.ps.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE CONFERENCE CALL

Folks,

Here is some language for discussion this afternoon.  Please note that this
is being submitted for discussion without full management approval; we're
getting so close to the bone that we'll probably need to take the final
package as a whole through our vetting process

I'm looking through the warranty section now, so perhaps we can discuss that
as well.

Ciao,

 Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

 - WorldHungerModsOct2.DOC


Please see the following announcement, which just went out to Enron Europe
Niki
---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Scott/LON/ECT on 03/04/2000 17:32
---------------------------

Fernley Dyson & Sally Beck
03/04/2000 17:31
Please respond to Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: ECT Europe
cc:

Subject: Organisational Announcement.

Enron Europe has played a vital role over the last few years in the global
expansion of  Enron,s  business.  Now we are taking a strategic role in
setting the standards for global operational performance.  Accordingly, we
will work closely with Global Risk Management Operations to assess our
operational policies, procedures and internal controls.  This will be a
collaborative effort to establish and implement standards and measurements to
be used world-wide.  This strategic initiative is critical to Enron,s
performance, in insuring that trading operations services are delivered
consistently across all commodities and all locations.
We are very pleased to announce that effective April 10, 2000, Brent Price,
Vice President of Global Risk  Management Operations, will office at Enron
House, reporting to both of us.  Brent will have the responsibility and
authority to facilitate this global initiative for Enron Europe.  Brent
brings a wealth of operational and risk experience.  His most recent
assignment included heading Gas Operations for Enron North America.

Brent will have the responsibility to assist and guide us through the process
of assessment and development of global operational standards and
measurements.  This will include evaluating the operational processes,
procedures and controls for all commodities and locations managed by Enron
Europe.  He will also advise us on any critical issues requiring immediate
action to insure that we are fully aligned in  the delivery of global
consistency throughout all of our operations.  He will work actively with the
operations staff in Enron Europe to achieve this goal.

We ask your full co-operation in supporting Brent and the success of this
initiative.

We remain committed to our mutual efforts to develop our people, build
business knowledge, leverage talent across locations and insure the integrity
of our global services.

Fernley Dyson     Sally Beck
VP, Chief Accounting Officer   VP, Global Risk Management Operations


David,  In Hong Kong and Japan, we set up local entities and used those
entities to apply for the various licenses in those jurisdictions.  I assumed
we would do the same in Singapore.  However, I think our discussions over the
past two weeks have raised questions about which entities will be used for
bandwidth trading in Asia.  There now appears to be a question about using
one trading entity, wherever it may be domiciled, and getting that company
licensed in each jurisdiction.  I don't think this issue has been resolved.
I will defer to the group (and perhaps we can discuss this on Wednesday) as
to whether we should continue our course of action and use the Singapore
entity to apply for the SBO license while we continue to discuss the overall
strategy.  Thank you, Michelle

	David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/11/00 02:34 AM

		 To: Robbi Rossi@EES
		 cc: Michelle Hicks@Enron Communications, Wayne Gardner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, <donald_lassere@enron.net>,
Robin_Hill@enron.net @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, <jan_haizman@enron.net>
		 Subject: Company Name to Use for our Singapore License

Robbi, Michelle:   This is to get guidance on whether I can use our newly
established
Singapore Company (below) in the application for our Singapore SBO license.
The license form requires me to name our company;  its Singapore Business
Registration
Number; its principal activities as registered in the registry of companies;
its address,
its corporate structure, its financial information, a contact person
name/designation,
a contact number, etc.

So normally I would reason to use this new company for this application.  Yet
in one of our
conference calls someone said (if I understood) that this company was only
for holding
title to equipment, not for all of the bandwidth trading, capacity providing
and content
activities described in the company purposes.   I suppose this distinction is
for a tax
purpose.

Be that as it may, I am faced with this form.   Can I use this company
(below)  in the application?
If not, then what company, and what are all of its characteristics as listed
in para one above??

To think ahead a bit, we will also need a company name for our Pioneer Tax
status application.
For sure that will have to be a Singapore Based company since the whole
rationale for Pioneer
Status revolves around locating in Singapore.   So maybe we should be using
the same name
for both applications?

Further, if we did get Pioneer Tax status (most favorable rate is zero tax
for five years
though we may or may not get that), wouldn't all of our standard tax
avoidance strategies
need to be re-looked at in the light that they possibly may not be as needed
in this case?

Please provide me guidance.   Many thanks.     PS:  I will be in Houston the
week of Nov 28
if needed for discussions but earlier guidance appreciated.

David

---------------------- Forwarded by David Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
11/11/2000 04:05 PM ---------------------------

"Ang & Partners" <mail@angpartners.com> on 11/10/2000 04:24:36 AM
Please respond to "Ang & Partners" <mail@angpartners.com>
To: <David.Merrill@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Enron Broadband Services Singapore Pte Ltd (the "Company")

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This e-mail from ANG & PARTNERS (including any attachment  to it) is
confidential and may also be privileged and exempt from disclosure  under
applicable law.

Accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient please notify us
immediately, delete this e-mail (including any attachment to it) from your
computer system and do not disclose or distribute it to any other person or
continue to read this e-mail. Thank you.

?
Dear Mr Merrill
?
I refer to our telephone conversation this  afternoon and as requested, I
attach herewith a copy of the Certificate of  Incorportion of the Company and
the main object clauses of the Company, for your  attention.
?
?
Regards
?
Preetha Pillai
ANG &  PARTNERS
?
Encls
 - Objects-MA.pdf
 - Certificate.pdf


Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 10, No. 20, August 7, 2000

Strong Defense, Promising Offense, Favorable Schedule Propel Horns to No. 7
in First AP Poll

Coach Mack Brown says the Longhorns don't rate a top 10 ranking in the wake
of their three-game slide to end 1999, but the Associated Press pre-season
pollsters say the Horns are No. 7.
Brown and his staff have simply done such and outstanding  job of assembling
talent and building a solid foundation to be overlooked in the pre-season
voting.
The Longhorns haven't finished in the AP top 10 since 1983, but there are
four big reasons why they should end that 17-year drought this season.
First, the talent base is young, but it is outstanding. Brown's first group
of recruits will be juniors or redshirt sophomores this year and many of them
have been playing ) and playing well ) since they were true freshmen.
Second, the defense was No. 6 in the nation last season, and it will be even
stingier this year.
Third, the offense will be a lot more consistent throughout this season
because there are so many more weapons at its disposal.
And last but certainly not least is the schedule.
Brown had to play Northern Division powers Nebraska (pre-season No. 1) and
Kansas State (pre-season No. 8) in 1998 and 1999. He went 2-2 against them in
the regular season, winning twice against Nebraska and losing two to K-State.
The 2000 Longhorn schedule is no cakewalk. It includes a road game at No. 24
Colorado, the annual Dallas grudge match with No. 19 Oklahoma and some other
dangerous dates.
But the early line has Texas favored in each of its 11 regular season games,
and that's something no Longhorn teams has had in its favor in at least 30
years.
As good as the Horns should be this year, next season should be their year to
really romp and stomp. Why? Because they have only five senior starters and
Brown will have four straight awesome recruiting classes ready to roll.
But this season can be a very good one, too. In addition to the high national
ranking in the pre-season polls, the Longhorns are heavy favorites to win the
Southern Division of the Big 12 and set up a championship game with Nebraska,
the Northern Division favorite and pre-season choice to win the national
title.
My theory is that the defense will be the best one Brown and his outstanding
defensive coordinator, Carl Reese, have put on the field at Texas. That
should give the young offense time to reload before playing the really big
guys on the schedule.
With the Longhorns first three games against teams that will throw 50 passes
a game (Louisiana-Lafayette, Stanford and Houston) even Reese's young
defensive ends won't be a liability because they are lightning fast pass
rushers, even if their run-stopping techniques do leave a little to be
desired.
Most of the other teams the Horns play during the regular season also are
pass-oriented because Oklahoma and Texas Tech are 50-pass teams, Missouri
probably will be and Oklahoma State, Colorado and Baylor probably will throw
40 or more passes in most games.
I also think sophomore TE Bo Scaife and redshirt freshman WR Artie Ellis with
a little help from dimunitive  sophomore WR Courtnee Garcia, will be able to
slow down a lot of those blitzes that terrorized the Texas offense at the end
of last season by allowing 15 sacks in the final two games against Nebraska
and Arkansas.
The Longhorns have an embarrassment of riches at quarterback where co-Big 12
Offensive Player of the Year Major Applewhite appears to healthy again after
knee surgery, but still might lose his job to immensely talented sophomore
Chris Simms.
Ditto at running back where senior Hodges Mitchell made the All-Big 12 team
last year and is being challenged by big, fast redshirt freshman Ivan
Williams, with sophomores Kenny Hayter and Victor Ike also in mix.
I can remember many past season when the Longhorns started and sometimes even
won with a starting tailback who wasn't as good as any of this group, and
neither the Longhorns nor anyone else in this area has ever had two QBs as
talented as Applewhite and Simms.
If we assume Scaife, Ellis and Garcia can fill the hole left by the
graduation of the team's top three receivers long enough for the talented
wide receiver recruits to start getting comfortable with the offense, then
the only real problem left is the offensive line.
I know it had problems in those final 10 quarters of the season, and I've
explained in detail in past issues while it wasn't all the linemen's fault,
but all of those guys are a year older now and should be a lot better this
year.
The only spot in the offensive line that really concerns me is right tackle.
The O-line did a good job during the first 11 games last year because UT was
No. 2 in the league in total offense until the receivers started getting
hurt, thus opening the door to more all-out blitzes.
The Longhorns even moved the ball well in the two losses in those first 11
games, but the problem at right tackle was exposed in one of those losses
when Kansas State forced six Texas turnovers by applying fearsome pressure
around the Horns' right side on virtually every pass play.
When Simms, a left-hander, is in the game, the right tackle will have to
protect his blind side.
Either Mike Williams or Cory Quye, who both started at times last year, must
step up this season, or the coaches might do what they have done to fix
problems in other areas ) move someone from another position. Fullback to
linebacker De'Andre Lewis and linebacker to fullback Matt Trissel are two
prime examples of moves that are paying dividends.
The prime candidate for a move could be guard Derrick Dockery, who coach
Brown called "the best freshman offensive lineman I've ever coached" last
year. With his quick feet, he would be an outside speed rusher's worst
nightmare.
That could open the door at guard to redshirt freshman Tillman Holloway, who
is the grandson of Longhorn legendary lineman Bud McFadin. Holloway is
talented and, like his grandfather was nearly 50 years ago, is a fierce
competitor. The offensive line could use another player whose competitive
juices run at a fever pitch.
One big problem for blitzers, even if the problems at right tackle persist,
will be Scaife. Nebraska and Arkansas were so good at delaying the Longhorn
receivers at the line of scrimmage that they often brought eight and
sometimes even  nine pass rushers.
If anyone ever brings nine this season, the other two defenders will try to
chuck the two wide receivers, and Scaife probably will score a touchdown if
Applewhite or Simms has a split second to toss him a short pass because there
are few defenders who can run him down.
If they bring eight guys, Ellis is 6-4 and Scaife is 6-3, and both are faster
than Kwame Cavil, the team's ace receiver last season. Cavil was a great
receiver, but, at 6-2, he was the only tall target among the key receiving
corps last season.
Tall receivers are able to take advantage of short cornerbacks in all-out
blitz situations. Remember that third-and-long pass the tall Arkansas
receiver caught over the short Texas cornerback after the Horns' two obvious
safeties didn't count? That was the difference in that game.
So, my contention is that blitzing is not going to work as well against UT as
it did late last season.
The Big 12 had five teams in the AP's pre-season top 25, headed by No. 1
Nebraska. Texas followed at No. 7, one step ahead of No. 8 Kansas State.
Oklahoma was rated at No. 19 and Colorado came in at No. 24.
After facing lots of ranked teams in his first two years at Texas, Brown will
face only two top 25 teams during the regular season this year.
Other than the big games against the Sooners and Buffaloes, the most
dangerous games for Texas during the regular season probably will be Texas
Tech in Lubbock, Stanford in Palo Alto and Texas A&M in Austin.

Freshmen Report Sunday

The freshmen report to campus next Sunday, August 13.
The freshmen will practice Monday through Wednesday, August 14-16, at Frank
Denius Fields (corner of 26th and Red River).
The veterans will report on August 16.
UT's first full-team practice is slated for Friday, August 18, at Whitaker
Field (51st and Guadalupe). The team will continue to practice at Whitaker
Field until school starts, at which time the practices will return to Denius.
All preseason practices are open to the public. Coach Mack Brown has not
released a full practice schedule, but, in the past, his morning practices
started around 8:30 and his evening practices began around 5 p.m.

Brown's Observations

Coach Mack Brown was upbeat about the Longhorns prospects at the Big 12 media
meetings in Kansas City last week, but he also said the team has to get
better in every area.
Here are some of the highlights of his comments:
On last season
"We did not start like we wanted to last year and we did not finish well, but
we had a real good football team during the interim, from game two through
game eleven."
On overall needs
"We need to continue to work to develop depth on our team. The Big 12 is a
physical league and it gets hot in Austin, so we have to be at least two deep
at every position. We played 14 games last season and we got tired. We have
to develop more depth, so we can play more people and not wear down during
the season."
On the offense
"We need to continue to work to run the ball better and we have to be more
patient in games when we're playing against great defenses. We don't have to
score every time, but we do have to make some plays and take care of the ball
better. We don't want to put our defense in bad situations."
On the defense
"We've got a really good defense, but we feel like we gave up too many big
plays at the end of the season. We've got to work on getting better at
cutting down on the big plays and we need to get a better pass rush out of
our front four so we don't have to blitz all the time."
On special teams
"We told your team it's not against the rules to return punts or kickoffs.
We've got to do a better job in those areas, and we're working on it. Our net
punting needs to be better and we need to do a better job in punt-blocking
situations."
On the pressure to win at Texas
"I got more pressure at North Carolina in my last year being 8-0 and then
losing to Florida State than I got after the three losses as the end of last
year. We lost those three games at the end and didn't look very good in some
of them and I didn't do a good job in some of them, but I've gotten more
support from the university and our fans than anywhere else I've ever
coached. The fans want us to win every game, and I want expectations to be
high. If you're at Texas, you want to win the national championship and you
need to have a goal to win the national championship and you need to have a
dream to win the national championship."
On the No. 7 ranking in the pre-season AP poll
"Expectations are high, but that's a good thing. The only reason we're ranked
that high is because we're Texas. We're not as good as the expectations and
the ranking right now, but we hope to grow into it."

It's a Great Time to Subscribe
To The Fax/E-Mail Service
I'll Have Reports Almost Daily During Pre-Season Practices  ! Get Instant
Information for Pennies a Day !
Save As An E-Mail Subscriber !
The True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn
football and Longhorn recruiting ) instantly. Follow Mack Brown and the
Longhorns with frequent fax updates. There are at least 99 timely faxes a
year, primarily about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send
your check to True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip
the coupon below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail,
just include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (a $14 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange by E-Mail and to subscribe to the
99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)

900 Number Updated Often

I update my 900 number frequently with football and football recruiting
scoops, and I'll update daily when practice starts.  The number is
1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 to call.

12 Early Commitments Have Texas Among Nation's Elite

The early recruiting blitz coach Mack Brown and his staff have worked to near
perfection in reeling in three nationally ranked recruiting classes in
succession is paying off again.
Texas is up to 12 early commitments now, and appears headed for another top 5
national class after getting CB Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.42, of San
Antonio Holmes and OL Terrance Young, 6-6, 340, 5.5, of Longview, both in
July.
The Longhorn coaches can't comment on their recruits until they sign in
February, but Griffin, the top prospect in San Antonio, said the UT coaches
told him they wanted him "because they said I had the size, speed and
athletic ability they were looking for in their cornerbacks."
He had 41 tackles last season, broke up 14 passes and had three
interceptions, two of which he returned for touchdowns.
Holmes' coach, David Sanchez, said Griffin "is the best cover corner in the
district. We went 13-2 last year and reached the state Class 5A semi-finals,
and his ability to take the other team's best receiver out of the game was a
big reason."
Griffin, who has run a 10.5 100 meters, said he had offers from Texas A&M,
Oklahoma, Colorado and Arkansas before he got a scholarship offer from Texas
on an unofficial visit on July 18, and he said he didn't waste any time
taking the UT offer.
"I knew all along that Texas is where I wanted to go," he said. "I really
like Texas' style of play and I was really impressed with the way the Texas
coaches stress academics as well as athletics.
Young also had plenty of offers ) Miami, UCLA, Notre Dame, Arkansas, Texas
A&M, LSU and Mississippi State ) before he drove to Austin on July 29 with
his parents, met with Brown and assistant coaches Darryl Drake and Tim Nunez
and committed. Drake recruits East Texas and Nunez is the offensive line
coach.
Like Griffin, he said the Longhorn offer was the one he was waiting on. "I
really like Texas," he said.
"They have great coaches and great kids, and they are going to do some great
things in the next few years. I want to be a part of that."
Young, who already is a full qualifier with fine grades and and a 980 SAT and
21 ACT score, said the Texas coaches told him they like the way he gets a
quick jump on the defensive linemen and then maintains his blocks.
For those of you who are concerned about that 5.5 time in the 40, don't worry
about it. Young has a very quick start for a big offensive lineman and is
adept at picking off speed rushers from the outside of his offensive tackle
spot.
How fast an offensive lineman gets started is a lot more important than his
40 time, and Young gets started in a hurry.
Longview coach Pat Collins, who coached an NCAA Division II national title
team at Northeast Louisiana before getting back into the high school coaching
ranks, said, "The Longhorns got a great football player and a great young man
with an outstanding family."
Collins said Young "Is one of the best high school prospects I have seen or
coached. he has worked really hard this summer and has excellent mobility and
agility."
Seven of the Longhorns' 12 commitments are offensive linemen. Texas has
signed only three offensive linemen in each of Brown's three previous
recruiting classes and he said heading into this recruiting season that the
offensive line was the No. 1 priority.
Since this is the best group of offensive linemen since I started doing this
back in 1990, he couldn't have picked a better year to clean up on the big
guys.
Here's a list of the Horns' early commitments:

Offensive Line (7)
Jonathan Scott, 6-7, 290, 4.9, Dallas Carter, a national top 100 player.
Abe Robinson, 6-6, 270, 4.9, Jersey Village, another national top 100 player.
Alfio Randall, 6-6, 300, 5.1, Blinn JC, was a national top 100 player two
years ago.
Mike Garcia, 6-5, 280, 5.2, Galena Park, broke the Aggies' hearts by changing
his early commitment to Texas.
Will Allen, 6-5, 300, 5.2, Cypress Falls, is another highly recruited star.
Roman Reeves, 6-6, 295, 5.2, another of the state's top eight offensive
linemen.
Terrance Young, 6-6, 340, 5.5, Longview.

Linebacker (1)
Yamil LeBron, 6-2, 240, 4.7, Killeen Ellison, was the middle backer the
Longhorns targeted early.

Defensive Back (4)
Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.42, San Antonio Holmes, one of the state's top
two cornerbacks.
Kendal Briles, 5-10, 175, 4.5, Wolfforth Frenship, a great option QB who will
play safety at Texas.
Braden Johnson, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity, a fine athlete who will play
QB this season.
Brian Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, The Woodlands, a two-way star at WR and CB.
* * * *
RECRUITING NOTES: Matt Nordgren, the Dallas Bishop Lynch star who is easily
the state's top QB prospect, is still a big Texas fan, but he isn't through
looking around. He and his parents took an unofficial visit to Texas A&M
Saturday, and he and his father will fly to Colorado this weekend for another
unofficial visit. Nordgren said he liked A&M and had a good time, "but Texas
is still No. 1. I really like the Longhorns." I'm pretty sure he'll commit to
Texas later this month. . . While things are still looking bright for the
state's best QB, it's no quite that rosy for the top RB, Cedric Benson of
Midland Lee. He has been a Texas fan and has talked about committing early to
the Longhorns, but now he says he doesn't want to commit this summer and
wants to wait take some official visits to other top programs before making
his choice. . . The Longhorn signees made good showings in the Texas High
School All-Star Game in Houston last week. QB Chance Mock of The Woodlands
led the North to a 17-13 victory by throwing two touchdown passes and was
named the MVP, an honor his father, Mike, won back in 1974 as a star QB from
Longview. The Mocks are the first father-son duo in Texas history to win MVP
awards in the North-South game. Matt McFadden of Coppell kicked off deep,
booted a field goal and even punted, something he didn't do in high school.
Tony Jeffery of Klein Forest, playing WR, and Nathan Vasher of Texarkana,
playing WR and CB, showed superb athletic ability for the North. C Tre Bates
of Fort Bend Austin and T Lionel Garr of Diboll did a good job of blocking,
and DT Sonny Davis of Austin Lanier, another UT signee who is headed to
junior college, looked great. If you watched the game, you know why Davis was
so heralded. Packing about 30 excess pounds on his normal 6-1, 310-pound
frame, he still was the quickest big man on either team. Let's hope he gets
his JC degree, sheds those excess pounds to get even quicker and returns to
Texas in two years. RB Sneezy Beltran of Abilene was more tentative than he
had been in his games at Abilene, but I have seen enough tape of his exploits
to know he is the real deal. . . So far, six members of the first team on
Dave Campbell's Texas Football magazine's Super Team have committed to
colleges. Running back David Underwood of Madisonville committed to Michigan
and the other five ) Briles, Robinson, Scott, Young and Griffin ) commited to
UT. . . The nation's top FB, James Buchanan, 6-2, 240, 4.7, of Sarasota,
Fla., Cardinal Mooney, ranks UT in his top three with Florida State and
Miami, and one of the top DEs in the nation, Shaun Cody, 6-5, 255, 4.6, of
Los Altos High in Hacienda Heights, Cal., who had 29 sacks last season, says
he will visit Texas. . . Look for the Horns to sign between 22 and 25
recruits.


I removed Labor Day(s) as business days for the years from 2002 to 2025
for production and stage databases.
The days are:
    02-SEP-2002
    01-SEP-2003
    06-SEP-2004
    05-SEP-2005
    04-SEP-2006
    03-SEP-2007
    01-SEP-2008
    07-SEP-2009

    06-SEP-2010
    05-SEP-2011
    03-SEP-2012
    02-SEP-2013
    01-SEP-2014
    07-SEP-2015
    05-SEP-2016
    04-SEP-2017
    03-SEP-2018
    02-SEP-2019

    07-SEP-2020
    06-SEP-2021
    05-SEP-2022
    04-SEP-2023
    02-SEP-2024
    01-SEP-2025

Truong Vu
x 5-3416


CheMatch.com continues auction growth
Dec 04, 2000 10:12 AM ET
	HOUSTON, Dec. 4 (LocalBusiness.com) -- CheMatch.com said more than 95,000
metric tons of chemicals were traded in November through its private auction
system -- a volume equal to more than half of the total trades since the
auction's inception last summer.
	In a written statement, Ed Moody, CheMatch.com's vice president of auctions
said the private auction system uses real-time pricing feedback and can be
tailored to the needs of each user.
	Since CheMatch.com started the private auctions, about 50 companies have
traded more than 175,000 metric tons of products including chemicals,
polymers and fuel products. The average value of completed transactions is
about $800,000.
	In addition to auctions, CheMatch.com also operates a commodity chemicals,
polymers and fuel products exchange on which more than 1 million metric tons
of product has been transacted.
	CheMatch has recently completed a restructuring that included layoffs, and
early last month it withdrew a planned initial public offering.
	Clay Jeansonne, CheMatch.com spokesman, told LocalBusiness.com last week the
company currently has 85 employees down from 93 and that CheMatch expects to
bring in new funding from venture capital and technology companies by the end
of the year.
	Privately held CheMatch.com is an Internet-based marketplace for the buyers
and sellers of bulk commodity chemicals, plastics and fuel products. Its
investors currently include Battery Ventures, Bayer AG (NYSE: BAYZY),
Computer Sciences Corp. (NYSE: CSC), DuPont (NYSE: DD), GE (NYSE: GE) and
Millennium Chemicals (NYSE: MCH).
	________________________________________________________-

o Online Marketing Firm iChoose Shuts Down

DALLAS -- iChoose, a developer of e-commerce marketing
systems, said it has shut down due to lack of funding.
In the past couple of months, the company has struggled
to stay alive by seeking out additional funding,
and even signed a letter of intent to be acquired.
That  acquisition fell through and the company said
it had no other choice than to close. iChoose was
unable to disclose the would-be-acquirer due to
legal restrictions. On its Web site, the company
posted a message with uninstall instructions for
its software and a final farewell to its customers.
iChoose was backed by Sevin Rosen.
http://www.ichoose.com/
_____________________________________________

o Web Security Firm @Stake Gets $26 Million in Second Round

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- @stake, a provider of Internet
security services, said it raised $26 million in
its second round of funding. Investors included
Madison Dearborn Partners and previous investor
Battery Ventures. Individual investors in the round
included Bruce Claflin, president and COO of 3Com;
Paul Sagan, president of Akamai Technologies; William
Cadogan, chairman, president, and CEO of ADC Telecom;
Bob Palmer, former chairman, president and CEO of
Digital Equipment; Eckard Pfieffer, chairman of
Intershop and former CEO of Compaq Computer; Morgan
O'Brien, co-founder of Nextel Communications; and
Robert J. Davis, CEO of Terra-Lycos. The company
will use the funding toward research and new marketing
programs.
http://www.atstake.com/

_____________________________________________________

o Commerce Software Firm Momenta Gets $5 Million Round One

AUSTIN, Texas -- Momenta, a software company providing
collaborative commerce applications and services
for electronic marketplaces, said it has raised $5
million in its first round of funding. Authosisa,
a Hong Kong-based venture capital firm, led the
round, which also included American Pacific Technology
Group and several individual Asian and American
investors. The company said it will use the funds
for marketing and product development.
http://www.momenta.com/
_____________________________________________