I just entered an index deal for one of our traders, and came across
something I hadn't noticed before. In EnPower, we have several choices for
the Dow Jones Mid-Columbia index, but none called specifically "Mid-C Firm
Peak." We have non-firm peak, and something called "Mid-Columbia Index."

I'm just wondering how to specify that I want the deal to settle against the
Dow Jones Mid-C PEAK index. In this case, because I was entering a
round-the-clock (all hours, all days) deal, I had to enter three different
deals to specify the three different indices - Mid-C Peak, Mid-C Off Peak,
and Mid-C Sundays and Holidays. But I don't see a Mid-C Peak choice, so I
entered the first as Mid-C Index.

Deal numbers are:
597244 - Peak
597245 - Off Peak
597246 - Sundays/Holidays

I just wanted to ask because when you guys plug the index prices in here I
want to make sure that "Mid-C Index" gets the peak price. Could you let me
know if it doesn't? And if that's the case, then I'll need to have another
pub code set up for peak price.

Thanks for your help on this. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kate
503-464-7486


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
BROWN, WILLIAM W                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 02, 2000
BRUCE, DANIEL                   PHILIPPE A BIBI                 Nov 10, 2000
DETMERING, TIMOTHY J            JEFFREY M DONAHUE JR            Oct 31, 2000
DOSHIER, RAYMOND W              KEVIN P HANNON                  Nov 13, 2000
FITZGERALD, JAY L               LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
GARNER, BRUCE                   LOUISE KITCHEN                  Oct 27, 2000
GROS, THOMAS D                  LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000
MCMAHON, JEFFREY                MARK A FREVERT                  Oct 31, 2000
ZIPPER, ANDREW A                LOUISE KITCHEN                  Nov 13, 2000


Thanks for taking the lead on this Tana - much sppreciated

David

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10/19/2000 09:07 AM
To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Alison
Keogh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Enron Australia Masters

At the request of David Minns their short name in Lotus Notes will be EAF
(for Enron Australia Finance).   David gave me a list of their masters, so I
am going to enter just the names and agreement.  David and Alison will flesh
out the rest of the data when he gets back.


Gentlemen,

I have made changes to the consolidation agreement, which I hope all will
find acceptable:

(It does need a date or two.)

As for the termination agreement, here's what I suggest:

Do we want to address the purchaser's parent guaranty in both of the
contracts, or just the consolidation agreement?  I would suggest that we make
the guaranty a deliverable 30 days after execution of the contracts, which
gives us time to get the Mitsui assignment done, as we expect to assign the
contracts immediately.  That way, Mitsui can provide the guaranty, if
necessary.  If ENA does provide the guaranty, we would want to have the
ability to have it replaced with a suitable substitute guaranty from Mitsui.

Sorry I missed your call.  It was a day of meetings.  I will be on the road
tomorrow, but will check my voice mail.

Kay


We are getting the Enron treatment from Coral.  I hope Carolyn told you I
called yesterday - Coral was looking for Shell approval.  I'm guessing it is
in a coma.  I usually have 30 voice mails, and I have had 4 today, which
tells you something.  Good  time for Michael to be sick!

Carlos has interviews today and tomorrow with ENA.  I think he is looking
good for Mexico.  You guys are the absolutely best qualified for that
business, and I'll start planting that seed when I can.

By the way, thanks for the great job on Coral.  Did you hear from Rose on the
HSR on TurboPark?

We do want Astros tickets for next year - at least 15 games.  Are more
available?

I heard that Hampton had an issue with Patty Biggio (thank goodness, these
salaries are absurd), and I guess I'm glad to see Ausmus come back.  However,
he is not a substitute for a pitcher.  And how is Shane?

Ciao,

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 12/12/2000 03:50:53 PM
To: "Mann, C. Kay" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Hola

Que paso con Coral?

Heard from your assistant that your son is sick-hope all is well.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


i cant open this


MARK YOUR LUNCH CALENDARS NOW !

You are invited to attend the EWS Brown Bag Lunch Series

Featuring:  TIM BATTAGLIA

Topic:  Steel Origination

Thursday, April 19, 2001
11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
EB 5 C2


<<2Z$805!.DOC>>  <<2Z$8RED.DOC>>

Greg and Isabel:

We have enclosed clean and blacklined copies of the escrow disbursement
instruction letter, marked to reflect revisions from the draft previously
circulated.  Please review and advise of any comments in order that we may
also circulate to Citibank.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosures 139328v5
  139328vR5/4

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2Z$805!.DOC
 - 2Z$8RED.DOC


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Deffner, Joseph; Duran, W David
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	AIG Highstar

Friday is the day when we are supposed to close the Alamac sale to AIG Highstar.  Should we fail to close this transaction, we should look to our potential alternatives for withdrawing from the fund, unless of course we view that we will close but it will happen over the few days following.    Interestingly, AIG may be planning to use further funds raised to create a second fund rather than add to the current fund leaving us with more of a percentage ownership but less capability of accessing the deals (fuel supply, despatch and EPC rights would not be attached to any second fund).

We also have far too many people talking to AIG now and we need to stop this immediately, going forward only Joe Deffner should communicate with Bob as at the moment we have too many people doing all of the work for AIG for no return.  As of Friday or the close of Alamac - Bob can only talk through Joe.  We are not in the business of doing work for this fund.

Can you put together (only if we fail to close) a short review for John of why we should stay in the fund over removing ourselves.  I recognize that contractually we have no capability of exiting at this point but I know you think differently and I hope you are right.  My view is that we need to get out as we have no control over their investments.  I have spoken to Brian Stanley on this fund and Brian is (unless someone in his group has a reason not to)  happy to follow whatever approach we take particularly as EE&CC is no longer a EPC company.


If you are reading this message in plaintext or if you have an AOL address you must click on this link: http://www.smallcapnetwork.net/archive/listserv/20020204-1.html  and wait for a web page to automatically open up to properly read this newsletter.
[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE] Dow Jones [IMAGE] 9687.09 -  220.17  6:08 pm EST, Mon., February 4, 2002  [IMAGE] NASDAQ [IMAGE]  1855.53 - 55.71  For info, visit www.smallcapnetwork.net  .  [IMAGE] S & P 500 [IMAGE]  1094.44 - 27.76  To be removed, please click here  .  [IMAGE] Russell 2000 [IMAGE]   470.09  - 9.95  VOLUME 02: ISSUE 10
[IMAGE]
 Patriots Win But The Markets Lose!   [IMAGE]This week investors will be hearing about how the markets are doomed.   The 14 point underdog New England Patriots upset the St. Louis Rams which was said to have had the greatest offense in history.  What does the Super Bowl have to do with your portfolio?    According to the Super Bowl Predictor theory, if an NFC team wins the Super Bowl then the markets go up for the year.  If the AFC wins then the market drops.  (Team from the old NFL ala Baltimore Ravens (Old Cleveland Browns) are categorized as an NFC team)   Before you laugh at the notion of a football game determining the markets, there is some hard data backing up the theory.  The indicator has been correct 29 out of the last 35 tries.  Being right 82% of the time is nothing to snicker.  However, in the past few years the indicator has failed miserably.  In 98 and 99 the AFC Denver Broncos repeated as champions and the markets were supposed to have been clawed by the bears.  Instead, investors saw the most stunning gains in history as the Nasdaq hit 5,000 and the Dow Jones topped 10,000.   In 00 and 01 when the Rams and Ravens won their Super Bowls respectively the markets saw a brutal decline which seemed to send investors in to a tail spin.   Take a deep breath before you decide to take all of your money out of the market and purchase some safe 2% yielding CDs.  The stock market has been a different animal the past four years and 2002 looks to be no exception.  We are now in a market of stocks where individual companies have been outperforming the overall market significantly.    Remember, it is always very important to diversify your portfolio with companies in different sectors and market caps.    This brings us to what could be the "Tom Brady MVP" company of the year.  For those of you football neophytes, Tom Brady is the 24 year old quarterback extraordinaire who piloted the Patriots to victory.    Our next profile will be occurring this week but we do not have the precise time when the new issue is trading.  The company will be completing a reverse merger and opened for trading this week.  We will be sending out an alert to our subscribers the moment the stock begins trading.  However, for the fastest way to find out when the company opens for trading is by visiting our home page where you will find a real time alert.   Here's to dispelling the Super Bowl Predictor for 2002 for SmallCap Digest subscribers.
 D I S C L A I M E R :[IMAGE] The SmallCap Digest is an independent electronic publication committed to providing our readers with factual information on selected  publicly traded companies. SmallCap Digest is not a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. All companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other pertinent criteria with a view toward  maximizing the upside potential for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.  Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from third party consultants and/or companies which it features for the publication and circulation of the SmallCap Digest or representation on SmallCapNetwork.net.  Likewise, this newsletter is owned by TGR, LLC.  To the degrees enumerated herein,  this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent publication.   Click Here  to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered, or visit the following web address:  http://www.smallcapdigest.net/compensation_disclosure.html  for our full compensation disclosure and http://www.smallcapdigest.net/short_term_alerts.html  for Trading Alerts compensation and disclosure.   All statements and expressions are the sole  opinions of the editors and are subject to change without notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company in the newsletter is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities  mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor the statements made herein.   The editor, members of the editor's family, and/or entities with  which the editor is affiliated, are forbidden by company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own benefit in the companies who appear in the publication. The profiles, critiques, and other editorial content of the SmallCap Digest and SmallCapNetwork.net may contain forward-looking statements relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein.   THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED. INVESTING IN  SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN  CONSENT OF THE EDITORS OF SMALLCAPNETWORK.NET.   We encourage our readers to invest carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites of  the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.gov  and/or the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com  . We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at  http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm  . Readers can review all public filings by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information on how to invest carefully at its web site.

---
You are currently subscribed to smallcapdigest as: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-smallcapdigest-871164Q@lyris.smallcapnetwork.net


Finally I found your email.  It is buried amongst 973 unread emails.....hence I
am still at work at 8:45 on Thursday night.

Anyway.....yeah, give us a call on Saturday morning.  We are thinking about
going out to Hula Hut before the game for Mimosas and Bloody's.

Tara

Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:

> Hey, I think I'm going to just come in on Saturday morning.  There is
> something going on in Houston on Friday night that I want to go to.  What
> about meeting up before the game?
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:51 PM
> To:       Dean, Clint
> Subject:  Re:
>
> How about Bryan and Monica's?  Or Julie Reese's?  Should wouldn't care if
> you
> stayed with her.
>
> Tara
>
> Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:
>
> > I don't have a place to stay.  Remember, Sat is my birthday, yeah.
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> > Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:38 PM
> > To:       Dean, Clint
> > Subject:  Re:
> >
> > What??  You're not coming in on Friday???  Lori, Jeff and I get in around
> 4
> > on
> > Friday.  Brenda is driving in around 3 on Friday too.  And yes, my man is
> > coming with me.  He actually found out that a fraternity brother of his
> > from
> > San Francisco is flying in for the game.  It is going to be so fun!!  I
> am
> > psyched.  Julie called yesterday and was so excited.  You have to come on
> > Friday night.  That will be the best night!!
> >
> > Tara
> >
> > Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > I think I'm driving in on Saturday morning, and staying with Bryan and
> > > Monica.  When are you getting to Austin?  Is your man coming with you?
> > >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> > > Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:22 PM
> > > To:       Dean, Clint
> > > Subject:  Re:
> > >
> > > I don't know details.  What are your plans?  Any thoughts??  Julie and
> I
> > > talked
> > > about maybe going to Hula Hut or Trudy's (for Mexican Martini's)
> Friday.
> > > Any
> > > suggestions?  Have you figured out what you are doing about this
> weekend?
> > >
> > > Tara
> > >
> > > Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > No crap, me too.  Can you be more specific?
> > > >
> > > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > > From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> > > > Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:13 PM
> > > > To:       Dean, Clint
> > > > Subject:  Re:
> > > >
> > > > Going to Austin!!  Why?
> > > >
> > > > Tara
> > > >
> > > > "Dean, Clint" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey, what are your plans for this weekend?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > > affiliate
> > > > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> > of
> > > > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure
> > > by
> > > > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> > (or
> > > > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or
> > > > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > > delete
> > > > all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are
> > > not
> > > > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> > evidence
> > > a
> > > > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > > > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not
> > be
> > > > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > otherwise.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>
> > >
> > >  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>
> >
> >  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>
>
>  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>

 - tstraws.vcf


I have thrown together the following list of issues that people have raised
so far:

Opportunity Costs under the soft cap
$150 too low
Benchmarks for Forward contracts
Regulation of long term sales
Preemption of PUC "buy" requirement
Commission's findings concerning exercise of market power
PUC's request for protective order


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/25/2000
05:09 PM ---------------------------

Marcelo Rassekh@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/25/2000 03:25 PM
To: Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal update

Sami and Sara,
As i've promised, here is a draft of the report we present every week during
the Origination staff meeting. I will send you a more updated version as soon
as i get all the updates. Any doubts, fell free to contact me. Sincerely,
Marcelo Rassekh


No deal for March or April 2000................  but I have flow..... in
March a total of   3804 flowed (delivery) and for April it's averaging about
100/day as a delivery.   in February this was on the  213 contract, deal
#83088 as a receipt at this delivery meter.  Do we have a deal at this city
gate to sell Palacios this gas?

THANKS!!!

Charlotte


Please prepare an ISDA draft per terms of this credit worksheet.

thanks
brant


Didn't you say mapquest said it takes around 6 hrs to get to Houston from
Corpus
Dickhead?


Please see the attached memo that Steve Kean sent to Ken Lay regarding the
WSJ article on Mark to Market Accounting.


Gere, just following up on the offsite - have you all agreed on the target
producer list for the insurance product?

How is the peaker product developing?

Regards
Delainey


Bear with me.  I want to work on it through the evening.  Will make sure that
it's out tonite, well in advance of tomorrow's 1 PM PDT conference call.

Best,
Jeff


I appreciate you pressing this issue.  You should both be aware that
Unocal(?) has been sued by the families of four employees who were shot in
Pakistan a couple of years ago.  Their claim is that the company did not
provide adequate security and ignored official warnings of trouble in the
region.

To: Gabriel Sanchez-Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melinda Winkler@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Security Assessment Report

Gabriel et al:

Looks like the risks to Enron travelers to (and employees in) Colombia have
increased.  This is another indication that a 'travel policy' for travelers
to Colombia should be in effect.  What happened to the one we were discussing
earlier?  The steps outlined there would go a long way in improving the
security of our travelers.

Control Risks' report discusses responses to the media - be sure you have the
approval of Enron's media people before making any response.

The report also recommends suspending bidding on new projects - probably not
viable advice, but reinforces the importance that additional security
measures be built into all new projects from day one.

Now that our name is in front of the Colombian public, we could see
retaliation for various acts, not all of which we have control over.  Recent
US Government actions such as extraditing criminals to the US for trial and
training Colombian anti-drug troops have done little to endear American
businesses to the Colombian public, who see such actions as interfering with
Colombia's right to govern themselves.  These actions have significantly
raised the risk of all American companies and their employees in Colombia.

A meeting I had about two years ago with David Beddow of Control Risks in
Bogota indicated that we could see some changes in the methods of attack in
urban areas by FARC/ELN.  With an elevated risk level, we should begin
thinking about these threats.  FARC seldom uses the car bomb method of attack
because it generates little interest among the domestic or international
media.  FARC plans on using letter bombs mailed to select targets, i.e., head
of an American-owned corporation who may have an office in Bogota.  This
method will generate headlines in the press and generate a fear of FARC among
businessmen who may be targets.  Control Risks' reported timetable for this
change in FARC's tactics was to be three to five years, but now that our risk
is higher, the timetable may well be moved up.

On a related note - did you employ the security person we recommended?

Please let me know how I can help you.

Regards,

Mike Hicks

Gabriel Sanchez-Sierra@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/05/99 08:15 PM
To: David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Stabler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Michael Hicks@ECT, Elaine Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Security Assessment Report

FYI please find attached the "Security Assessment Report " carried out  by
Control Risk  . Please let me have your feed back .GSS
---------------------- Forwarded by Gabriel Sanchez-Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 12/05/99 08:24 PM ---------------------------

Mark Carlson <MDCarlson@compuserve.com> on 12/03/99 12:17:03 PM
To: Gabriel Sanchez-Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Security Assessment Report

Gabriel,

Please find attached Control Risks (Bogota) initial Security/Risk
Assessment of the issues/situation we discussed on Friday, November 26th.

I've also included our Risk Assessment Matrix that summarizes the issues
we've reviewed as part of our analysis.

Once you've had the opportunity to review the attached documents we can
further address the steps we  discussed at breaKfast concerning Control
Risks (Bogota) working more closely with Enron Colombia and our office
dedicating on-call resources to suppport you in Colombia.

Regards,

Mark

MD Carlson
Deputy General Manager
Control Risks Group
Bogota, Colombia
 - Enron.doc
 - Enron Risk Assessment Matrix.doc


As per my voice mail yesterday, EES is interested in having access to the
IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) and Altrade Electronic Brokering System for
power.  EES would really need only read-only access, as all trades would
continue to be conducted through ENA (or EPMI).  I believe the ICE agreement
with ENA allows this type of access by affiliates, although we likely need to
obtain additional user licenses.  I do not know whether the Altra agreement
with ENA would allow for EES to access the Altrade system.

I think it would be preferable for EES to be able to access the systems under
the current ENA agreements rather than entering into their own agreements,
given that ENA will continue to be the trading party.  Thoughts?  Could you
please advise as to how EES can get the access it needs?

Thanks,
Elisa Donovan
EES Legal
Ph: 713-345-4142


Leave as is in Sitara.

Tom Acton@ENRON
04/14/2000 08:27 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Well head

This must be change day,  Shoreline would like to change meter 6886 from 490
to 220.  Daily meter  actual show it's been running 398 on the 1st and  2nd
and 6 mmbtu on the 3rd.  looks like it may be falling down.  Let me know
Daren thanks.


Hello, Bill!   Stan will attend in person.

Cindy

Billy Dorsey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/02/2001 12:03 PM
To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT,
Richard Causey@ENRON, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Cox@Enron Communications, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron, Steve Elliott@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron, Ben Glisan@ECT, Kevin Hannon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Stanley Horton@ENRON, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Louise Kitchen@ECT, Mark Koenig@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay@ENRON, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Danny
McCarty@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Mark Metts/NA/Enron,
Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Cindy Olson@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken
Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Matthew Scrimshaw@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron, John Sherriff@ECT,
Jeff Skilling@ENRON, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley@ECT, Thomas E
White/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
cc: G G Garcia/NA/Enron, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT,
Sharron Westbrook@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Inez C
Dauterive@ECT, Carol Ann Brown@ECT, Cindy Stark@ENRON, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming@ENRON,
Tori L Wells@ECT, Cathy Phillips@ECT, Loretta Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sue Ford/HOU/ECT, Dolores Fisher/NA/Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy
Dalton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Mercedes E Estrada@Enron Communications,
Christina Grow/Corp/Enron, Lauren Urquhart@ECT, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Liz M Taylor@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy McMahon/NA/Enron@Enron,
Suzanne Danz@ENRON, Peggy McCurley/HOU/ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT, Samantha
Lopez-Dias/EU/Enron@Enron, Jana L Paxton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Connie Blackwood/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tammie Schoppe@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT, Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Ferrari@ECT, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer T
Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Leah Rijo@ECT, Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron, Julie Armstrong@Enron, Binky
Davidson/HOU/EES@EES, Mrudula Gadade/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Kelly Johnson@Enron, Rebecca Carter@ENRON, Tina Spiller/Corp/Enron, Vivianna
Bolen/Corp/Enron, Linda Hawkins/Corp/Enron, Vanessa Bob/Corp/Enron, Esmeralda
Hinojosa/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: re: Executive Committee Meeting

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  Monday, May 7th
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Bill Dorsey (713/646-6505) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, May
4th

Thank you,
Bill Dorsey.


Jason,

This is perfect.  Thank you for your assistance.


Greetings Jeff,
Sorry for the delay in responding.  I would call TJ at
Haas (510) 643-0435 and have her help you get to the
right person.
Kindly,
Salvador

--
Salvador D. Aceves
Assistant Professor, Accounting
Director, Executive Education
School of Business and Management
University of San Francisco
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA  94117
Tel (415) 422-6263 fax (415) 422-2502
e-mail: acevess@usfca.edu

>
>
> Greetings professor:
>
> Sorry to bother you with this.  Sad to say that things were working well,
but
> now, for some reason, Izio won't let me in, saying that my password is not
> correct (the one they sent me).  When I try to have them send me a new one,
I
receive nothing.>
> ? Is there someone I should contact to try and resolve?
>
> Second, I've been informed that I will be travelling on business on December
> 11th, which conflicts with the final.?Is it possible to take the final the
> preceding week, or on the 13th or 14th?? Apologies for any inconvenience.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>


Thanks!  Have a good weekend.  I'll see you Monday night.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana.Davis@enron.com [SMTP:Dana.Davis@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 3:16 PM
> To: cashley@poha.com
> Subject: Strongman Outline
>
> Hi Carolyn -
>      This is an outline the Jacque wants us to use when we prepare our
> lesson summary for our particular strongman.  Hope this will be helpful
> and
> may God bless you to do your best when it's your turn.
>
> Love you,
>
> dd
> (See attached file: Strongman Outline.doc) << File: Strongman Outline.doc
> >>


The World Trade Center has made arrangements with Bally Total Fitness to offer discounts to WTC tenants. The current promotion includes 2 weeks of free visits and an 8-day guest pass. If you are interested in taking advantage of this offer, please visit the Security Desk at 1-WTC.

Also, if you are interested in joining a membership facility and would like more information about the Enron's Fitness Reimbursement Program, or if you have any questions about the promotion with Bally Total Fitness, please let me know!

Thanks,
Grace
x8321

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Hi Jeff:

I'd love to sit down and talk with you in more detail about your decision to
leave Enron. If at any point you feel comfortable talking about it, how
about doing so in the Chronicle?

I'm sure you're aware of the speculation and rumors out there and how that's
hurting the stock. Talking to me would be an opportunity for you to stop the
negative chatter.

Aside from that, I think there's a genuine interest in the community in your
decision. I'm sure there are plenty of executives at other companies who
would love to read to about it, and wish they had the guts to do what you
did.

End of pitch.

Laura

Laura Goldberg
Business Reporter
Houston Chronicle
713-220-7207
713-354-3419 (fax)


Mo,

The Estate has a valuable transmission contract with PGE (between Mid-C and COB).  We (you) get billed once an month and need to make sure the estate pays this promptly.  PGE has been given your name as the POC.  I treat this like a power contract and make sure Houston wires the money as soon as we get an invoice.

Steve


Attached is PIRA's latest "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact
Morris Greenberg (email: morris@pira.com) or Victoria Watkins (email:
vwatkins@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Electricity Daily Demand Forecast" outside a
Client's licensed distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are
unsure of their licensed distribution or require an extension of their
current license should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to
sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - ed060801.pdf
 - ed060801.xls


We're glad to hear that you are coming and we're looking forward to seeing
you again.

You can fly into any one of the three Washington area airports.  Reagan
National is the closest (about 35 minutes by car in non-rush hour traffic),
Washington Dulles is about 40 minutes away and BWI is about 50 minutes away.
That is generally our order of preference in looking for flights.  However,
flights into BWI in general may be cheaper than flights into Dulles or
National, and National tends to be the most expensive.  You need to check all
three as to price, because airfares change frequently and sometimes USAir or
another airline will quote a decent price into National.  Once you have
decided which airport you will be using, let us know and we will e-mail
directions.

Love - Anita and Steve


Mark,

Your account is Pru Advisor which entitles you to a rate of $24.95 per trade.

Heather

"Whitt, Mark" <Mark.Whitt@enron.com>
Wednesday October 24, 2001 04:59 PM
To:   "Heather K. Strauss" <heather_strauss@prusec.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: CL/CO - Barton

What are the cost per trade?

-----Original Message-----
From: Heather K. Strauss [mailto:heather_strauss@prusec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: CL/CO - Barton

Mark,

The fee for this account is $35.00 per year.

Regards,

Heather Strauss
Assistant to Michael Barton

************************************************************************
*************************

The confidentiality of Internet e-mail cannot be guaranteed. Information
you
send us
over Internet e-mail could be viewed by persons other than the intended
recipients.
Therefore, you should not include your account numbers, credit card
numbers,
passwords, home address or other private information in your e-mail
messages.
Also, we will not accept buy or sell orders or cancels, address changes,
funds
transfer requests or other instructions normally requiring your
signature by
e-mail.

All market prices, data and other information in this communication are
not
warranted
as to completeness or accuracy and may be subject to change. This
communication
is not an official record of your account and should not be relied upon
for
information
regarding your account. Please refer to your Trade Confirmation and
Client
Statement
which are the official records of your account. If there are any
discrepancies
between
this transmission and your Trade Confirmation and Client Statement, you
should
rely
on the Trade Confirmation and Client Statement and contact your local
branch
manager with any questions.

This information is being sent to you for your information or at your
request.
If you do
not wish to receive any further information about our products or
services,
please
send a message via e-mail to PSI_DO_NOT_EMAIL@ PRUDENTIAL.COM.

Prudential Securities Incorporated
One Seaport Plaza New York, NY 10292

************************************************************************
*************************

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

*************************************************************************************************

The confidentiality of Internet e-mail cannot be guaranteed. Information you
send us
over Internet e-mail could be viewed by persons other than the intended
recipients.
Therefore, you should not include your account numbers, credit card numbers,
passwords, home address or other private information in your e-mail messages.
Also, we will not accept buy or sell orders or cancels, address changes, funds
transfer requests or other instructions normally requiring your signature by
e-mail.

All market prices, data and other information in this communication are not
warranted
as to completeness or accuracy and may be subject to change. This communication
is not an official record of your account and should not be relied upon for
information
regarding your account. Please refer to your Trade Confirmation and Client
Statement
which are the official records of your account. If there are any discrepancies
between
this transmission and your Trade Confirmation and Client Statement, you should
rely
on the Trade Confirmation and Client Statement and contact your local branch
manager with any questions.

This information is being sent to you for your information or at your request.
If you do
not wish to receive any further information about our products or services,
please
send a message via e-mail to PSI_DO_NOT_EMAIL@ PRUDENTIAL.COM.

Prudential Securities Incorporated
One Seaport Plaza New York, NY 10292

*************************************************************************************************


Sorry man, I am swamped today.  Doing my book and Trey's and I have a 6 p.m.
flight to Utah.  I will try and get back with you today.  The offer will
definitely have to get sweeter to get the 2 pick overall.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000 10:45
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Executive Compensation @ ENRON                           11/14/2000
07:17 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Eligible Employees
cc:
Subject: Deferral Enrollment 2001

Good news!  Deferral program enrollment begins Wednesday, November 15, 2000.
 Enron's Bonus Stock Option and Bonus Phantom Stock Programs provide you with
an opportunity to receive stock options and phantom stock in lieu of all or a
portion of the cash bonus you may receive during 2001.   To make enrollment
even more convenient for you, this year's deferral program information is
available on eHRonline.

To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000 (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

Sound easy?  It is!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


Stephanie -

Can you finalize the attached and have it signed.  I need to initial it, but it needs to be signed by Brad Richter.

Thanks.

Mark


Confidential Settlement Material under CPUC Rule 51

Gas Accord II Rule 51 List:

Attached are the electronic versions of our presentations at the November 7
and 8 Gas Accord II Workshop.

Thank you for your participation in Gas Accord II and in the Workshops.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions, concerns or suggestions.

Frank Lindh    Ray Williams
Attorney    Director
415-973-2776   415-973-3634
frl3@pge.com   rdw0@pge.com

 <<Overview of Supply-Facility Reliability.ppt>>  <<Demand-Supply Forecast
11-7-00 Workshop.ppt>>  <<Winter Supply Reliability Options for 11-7.ppt>>
<<Capital Expenditures for 11-8-00 Workshop.ppt>>  <<Transmission Pricing
Options for 11-8-00 Workshop.ppt>>

 - Overview of Supply-Facility Reliability.ppt
 - Demand-Supply Forecast 11-7-00 Workshop.ppt
 - Winter Supply Reliability Options for 11-7.ppt
 - Capital Expenditures for 11-8-00 Workshop.ppt
 - Transmission Pricing Options for 11-8-00 Workshop.ppt


We are planning on meeting on Monday, October 22nd from 10:00 to 11:00 to discuss the Southern Trails Pipeline West Leg data room.  We will meet in EN 1336.  During this meeting, we will discuss:

General description of the project

What data needs to be requested to be included in the data room

Assignments in the data room

Timing of visiting the data room

Please contact me if you are unable to attend or need to send a substitute representative.

Thanks,

Mark

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com


Molly,

I think you called his bluff. If he does not fax a copy of his paycheck stub,
we should not talk to him. He never talked to me about  it. If he made a true
statement
about his compensation, he should have no reservations about sending us the
confirmation.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Molly Magee                           11/27/2000 01:58 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Charles Shen

Vince:  I left you a voicemail about Charles Shen a week or so ago, but
wanted to follow up with you.  When I called him to extend our offer to him,
he expressed surprise at the base salary offer of $110,000, and told me that
he was currently earning base pay in the amount of $120,000.   I told him
that the salary figure he had written himself on the application was
$102,000, but he insisted that he had made an error and that it should have
been $120,000.   I asked him what base salary he was looking for, and he said
he would expect at least a 10% increase in his base.   I then told him that I
was not authorized to make an offer above our initial one, and would contact
you and get back to him.

I called him later that afternoon and asked him to fax me a copy of his last
paycheck stub so that we could minimize the confusion about his base pay.  He
said that he would be happy to do so,  but I never received the fax.  He left
me a voicemail message during the evening that said he was on vacation and
didn't have access to the pay stubs,  but would send me a copy when he
returned.

I have not heard from him since, and wondered if he had contacted you.   If
not, would you want to get together to discuss our next step?

I'll wait to hear from you,
Molly
x34804


Here is the detail of yesterday's position.  Let me know if there's anything
else you need.

Thanks,
Robin
x713-345-7478


Everything is good here. Gary has been with Enron for quite a while.  Most
recently, he managed interest rate and foreign exchange/currency risk.  You
should give him a call or email.

Besitos a las chicas de Filo.

Suerte,

Scott

Pablo Acevedo @ ENRON   08/01/2000 12:37 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Question

Hey Scott,
How is the East Desk doing?I can imagine that things are rolling over there.
Do you know this new guy assigned to trading Ag. commodities Gary Hickerson?
I would really like to get in touch with him. What do you think.

Trying to make things roll down here.

Saludos,

Pablo
(Ta fresco pa chomba)

PS: Hey the chicks from Filo are still asking about you.


Hey Joe, BTW, don't you think that at this point that footer message at the bottom of your E-Mails is...well...sorta irrelevant/humorous/sad?

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Joe.Parks@ENRON.com; Chet_Fenner@bmc.com; knipe3@msn.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

you guys are not homophobes, or is that what all that business at the lease
is about?

>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
>To: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, "Erik Wollam"
><erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>,
><knipe3@msn.com>
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:18:30 -0600
>
>All right, Men, Joe has a valid point...Any comments....Where is Chad?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM
>To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>yes, according to chet's co-worker
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
>	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:14 AM
>	To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
>	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>	Is Thursday night, "Man Night" for "those kinds of men" too???
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
>	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:09 AM
>	To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
>	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>	so your proposing we are going to the stabbing cabin. go to tampico
>		-----Original Message-----
>		From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
>		Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:08 AM
>		To: Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe
>		Subject: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>		Men,
>
>		            The final descision on the night of men will be as follows...
>
>		Where: Tony's Mexican (bring your own clown and accessories, please)
>
>		When: Thursday 2/28 at 7:15 pm.
>
>		We will wait until Zander is able to attend, to try the Tampico place.
>Would rather go w/ someone who knows the drill.
>
>		I am very much looking forward to seeing all of you men.
>
>
>                Pig-N-a-Stinky-blanket
>
>
>	**********************************************************************
>	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
>and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
>the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
>others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
>authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
>all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
>binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
>Thank you.
>	**********************************************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Praveen Mellacheruvu
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: PMellacheruvu 6-05-01
Report Total: $125.83
Amount Due Employee: $125.83

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Does this mean that 598738 should be off peak hours as well? Because 598739
is only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both sides need
to have the same hours......

Let me know, and I'll change them accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

sorry it is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

598736 and 598737 have been changed to off-peak hours. But I can't pull up
306927. Is this the right deal number?

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

Bob Badeer
deal 306927
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598737
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598736
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs


Do you have our flight info?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Cc:	Kitagawa, Kyle
Subject:	Trip to Beaver Creek

John,

Thanks for the offer of the back seat (or was it the trunk?) of your rental car from Denver. I'd like to take you up on it.

I'll meet you and Kyle at the Calgary airport on the 16th.

See you then,

Dave


How could coal fired QF's play into your and George's strategy?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
08:31 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
07/12/2000 12:02 AM
To: Michael J Beyer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coal Fired Generation

Mike, this looks great - looking forward to seeing your final thoughts.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000
11:56 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Michael J Beyer                           07/11/2000 06:04 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Coal Fired Generation

Dave

In response to your e mail, this is meant to update you on the status of the
search for potential coal fired generation sites.

We have used the following criteria to screen potential sites east of the
Mississippi including the following:

 Underutilized existing coal fired generation (15 sites)
 Existing coal fired generation that is on cold stand by (12 sites)
 Coal units that have been retired (20 sites)
 Coal fired units that at one time had planned coal unit additions that were
delayed or cancelled (11 sites)
 Undeveloped sites that had planned to build coal units (13 sites)
 Undeveloped sites that had planned to build nuclear units (5 sites)

We are in the process of prioritizing each site based on infrastructure,
transmission access, market and permit status. That effort should be
concluded this week and the study forwarded to you. We are also talking with
two coal operators that are in the process of developing their own coal fired
generation in Kentucky and West Virginia.

We will keep you apprised of the progress and meet with you again as we move
to the next stage.


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041316.txt
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table
!!!Could not find object.
Unrecognized database format 'R:\EnpowerCAPS\CAPS97DATA.mdb'.
General SQL error.
Table


This is pretty much an all-out attack against the positions that we and the
generators have taken.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/21/2000 07:43 AM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	11/20/2000 01:38 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Tandy McMannes" <mcmannes@aol.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven
Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>,
"John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan"
<joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, <iep@iepa.com>,
"Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "David Keane" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Richard Hyde"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>
		 cc: "Susan McCabe" <sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg" <Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan"
<mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren" <Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti"
<marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Hedy
Govenar" <hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>,
"Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Jenn
Paulsen" <paulsen@hmot.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>
		 Subject: Peace Press Conference Notes

Senator Steve Peace held a press conference today to discuss, as chair of
the Senate Budget Committee, the Senate Budget proposal with contain $2
billion for a special reserve for energy initiatives.

He stated that he is not proposing any uses for this money, that it is
designed to &preserve the options for the Governor8 and other policy makers
in dealing with California,s energy woes.  However, he proceeded to outline
some possible options, including the state taking over the transmission
system, condemning power plants and the state running them, condemning just
the output of the states power plants, or having the state build power
plants.  Again, he is not proposing these, they are just options for the
Governor.

Other comments of interest:

- Generators are only willing to build power plants if they can get 14 cents
kw/hr.  If that,s the case, the state can build them for cheaper.

- He noted that today the CEC will release some data that calls into
questions there is a supply problem.  Independent energy producers have
&fabricated the supply problem.8

- Criticized generators for pushing for retail solutions, saying that
&nothing would be more disastrous than opening the retail market before the
wholesale market is controlled.8

- &Generators are extorting the law8 and &running roughshod over California,
s environmental law8 in a &well-orchestrated political agenda.8

- Generators are in a &full-scale attack on the balance sheets8 of the
investor-owned utilities.

- He also said that the IOUs have indicated that they would be willing to
get back into the generation business if the state finances it.

- Generators are asking FERC to keep prices artificially high.

- He still insists that rates are outright market manipulation, and that
generators were holding back thousands of megawatts of power this summer.
Cites today,s higher prices as an example.

Please contact me or our office if you would like a copy of the press
release or the other supporting materials, including his letter to Lynch
that urges the CPUC to deny the IOUs cost pass-through request, and asks the
CPUC to order the IOUs &to exhaust their legal remedies to obtain refunds
from all parties who were the beneficiaries of the proceeds of the unlawful
wholesale charges the IOUs incurred.8

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Associate
Edson+Modisette
916-552-7070
Fax- 552-7075
jmball@ns.net


-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Gossett, Brad
Subject: RE:

can you also send me anna kulic's review.  I need to add 1 comment.  Thanks again.
PL

-----Original Message-----
From: Gossett, Brad
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject:


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 20, 2001

Notice ID: 3283
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR NOVEMBER 21, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

ALLOCATIONS DUE TO LONG WALL MINING OF LINE SM-123:  For the following MLI
points: There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.  There is no
capacity for overruns.

        Equitable Hi Hat       MLI F3
        KYWV Beaver Creek      MLI H1
        CNR Boldman            MLI CNR02
        CNR Conoway            MLI CNR03
        CNR Johns Creek        MLI CNR08
        CNR Canada             MLI CNR09, CNR10
        CNR Stafford           MLI CNR11
        CNR Thacker/Majestic   MLI CNR12
        CNR Briar Mtn.         MLI CNR13
        CNR Huff Creek         MLI CNR14
        Conoco Grant           MLI P1

KA-1 LINE (819288 AND 827280):  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There
is no capacity for ITS customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm
customers.

INTERNAL CONSTRAINT:

LANHAM:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               NOT Available +
ISS Injections            NOT Available
SIT Injections            NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks        NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of November 21, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on November 21, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 20, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


The following limited liability companies are being considered for dissolution this week. Please let me know by 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 12, 2001 if there is any reason not to dissolve these limited liability companies.  If I receive no responses, we will proceed with the cancellations.
Please distribute this memo to all interested parties within your group.

Chiricahua I LLC (Company #1382-CHRI)
Chiricahua II LLC (Company #1383-CHR2)
Chiricahua III LLC (Company #1384-CHR3)
Chiricahua IV LLC (Company #1385-CHR4)
Chiricahua V LLC (Company #1386-CHR5)
Chiricahua VI LLC (Company #1387-CHR6)
Chiricahua VII LLC (Company #1388-CHR7)
Chiricahua VIII LLC (Company #1389-CHR8)
Chiricahua IX LLC (Company #1390-CHR9)
Chiricahua X LLC (Company #1391-CHR10)
Chiricahua XI LLC (Company #1392-CHR11)
Chiricahua XII LLC (Company #1393-CHR12)
Chiricahua XIII LLC (Company #1394-CHR13)
Chiricahua XIV LLC (Company #1395-CHR14)

Teresa A. Callahan
Supervisor-Corporate Services
and Assistant Secretary
Enron Corp. - EB4801
Phone:	713-345-8444
Fax:	713-646-8007


I will call him again on Monday.  Do I get a commission.  Just kidding.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley
Subject:

Stan

I haven't heard from the fellow from El Paso


Team,

As everyone knows, we will use DealBench (a secure on-line platform) as a
virtual due diligence room and for more. We are in the process of uploading
electronic copy of due diligence documents, plant pictures, due diligence
list, management presentation with voices of developers and more on
DealBench.

Attached is the first draft of DealBench instruction I prepared. You will
receive invitation email(s) to DealBench. Please read attached instruction
and  log onto DealBench. Please give us any comments on using DealBench based
on your experience. We will improve this instruction and send out to Phase II
bidders next week.

Regards,

Jinsung Myung
(713-853-7330)


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 06:54 AM ---------------------------
From:	Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 04:32 PM CDT
To:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudio Ribeiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate, Britt Whitman/ENRON@enronXgate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	California Update 5/4/01

If you have any questions, please contact Kristin Walsh at (713) 853-9510.

Bridge Loan Financing Bills May Not Meet Their May 8th Deadline Due to Lack of Support
Sources report there will not be a vote regarding the authorization for the bond issuance/bridge loan by the May 8th deadline.   Any possibility for a deal has reportedly fallen apart.  According to sources, both the Republicans and Democratic caucuses are turning against Davis.  The Democratic caucus is reportedly "unwilling to fight" for Davis.  Many legislative Republicans and Democrats reportedly do not trust Davis and express concern that, once the bonds are issued to replenish the General Fund, Davis would "double dip" into the fund.  Clearly there is a lack of good faith between the legislature and the governor.  However, it is believed once Davis discloses the details of the power contracts negotiated, a bond issuance will take place.  Additionally, some generator sources have reported that some of the long-term power contracts (as opposed to those still in development) require that the bond issuance happen by July 1, 2001.  If not, the state may be in breach of contract.  Sources state that if the legislature does not pass the bridge loan legislation by May 8th, having a bond issuance by July 1st will be very difficult.

The Republicans were planning to offer an alternative plan whereby the state would "eat" the $5 billion cost of power spent to date out of the General Fund, thereby decreasing the amount of the bond issuance to approximately $8 billion.  However, the reportedly now are not  going to offer even this concession.  Sources report that the Republicans intend to hold out for full disclosure of the governor's plan for handling the crisis, including the details and terms of all long-term contracts he has negotiated, before they will support the bond issuance to go forward.

Currently there are two bills dealing  with the bridge  loan; AB 8X and AB 31X.  AB 8X authorizes the DWR to sell up to $10 billion in bonds.  This bill passed the Senate in March, but has stalled in the Assembly due to a lack of Republican support.  AB 31X deals with energy conservation programs for community college districts.  However, sources report this bill may be amended to include language relevant to the bond sale by Senator Bowen, currently in AB 8X.  Senator  Bowen's language states that the state should get paid before the utilities from rate payments (which, if passed, would be likely to cause a SoCal  bankruptcy).

According to sources close to the Republicans in  the legislature, Republicans do not believe there should be a bridge loan due to money available in the General Fund.  For instance, Tony  Strickland has stated that only 1/2 of the bonds (or approximately $5 billion)  should be issued.  Other Republicans reportedly do not support issuing any  bonds.  The Republicans intend to bring this up in debate on  Monday.  Additionally, Lehman Brothers reportedly also feels that a  bridge loan is unnecessary and there are some indications that Lehman may  back out of the bridge loan.

Key Points of the Bridge Financing
Initial Loan Amount:	$4.125 B
Lenders:		JP Morgan		$2.5 B
			Lehman Brothers		$1.0 B
			Bear Stearns		$625 M
Tax Exempt Portion:	Of the $4.125 B; $1.6 B is expected to be tax-exempt
Projected Interest Rate:	Taxable Rate		5.77%
			Tax-Exempt Rate		4.77%
Current Projected
Blended IR:		5.38%
Maturity Date:		August 29, 2001
For more details please contact me at (713) 853-9510

Bill SB 6X Passed the Senate Yesterday, but Little Can be Done at This Time
The Senate passed SB 6X yesterday, which authorizes $5  billion to create the California Consumer Power and Conservation  Authority.    The $5 billion authorized under SB 6X is not the  same as the $5 billion that must be authorized by the legislature to pay for  power already purchased, or the additional amount of bonds that must be authorized to pay for purchasing power going forward.  Again, the Republicans are not in support of these authorizations.  Without the details of the long-term power contracts the governor has  negotiated, the Republicans do not know what the final bond amount is that must  be issued and that taxpayers will have to pay to support.   No further action can be taken regarding the implementation of  SB 6X until it is clarified how and when the state and the utilities get paid  for purchasing power.    Also, there is no staff, defined purpose, etc. for  the California Public Power and Conservation Authority.  However, this can  be considered a victory for consumer advocates, who began promoting this idea  earlier in the crisis.

SoCal Edison and Bankruptcy
At this point, two events would be likely to trigger a SoCal bankruptcy.  The first would be a legislative rejection of the MOU between SoCal and the governor.  The specified deadline for legislative approval of the MOU is August 15th, however, some decision will likely be made earlier.  According to sources, the state has yet to sign the MOU with SoCal, though SoCal has signed it.  The Republicans are against the MOU in its current form and Davis and the Senate lack the votes needed to pass.  If the legislature indicates that it will not pas the MOU, SoCal would likely file for voluntary bankruptcy (or its creditor - involuntary) due to the lack operating cash.

The second likely triggering event, which is linked directly to the bond issuance, would be an effort by Senator Bowen to amend SB 31X (bridge loan) stating that the DWR would received 100% of its payments from ratepayers, then the utilities would receive the residual amount.  In other words, the state will get paid before the utilities.  If this language is included and passed by the legislature, it appears likely that SoCal will likely file for bankruptcy.  SoCal is urging the legislature to pay both the utilities and the DWR proportionately from rate payments.


Sounds good.

We went to Palacios last weekend.  The water was very silty from the rain,
and the tide was low.  There were a few black drum, but not much else.  We
did find a stone crab, which was a first.

Kay

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 11/28/2000 08:09:58 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Kay,

I have a conflict Wed afternoon.  But can catch up on Thurs with you and
Kent.

Meanwhile, please send me an e-copy of the LM Exhibits.  I can do a quick
redline of those that change.  I've already marked up w/ red pen, the ESA
Electrobolt + the Summary of terms sheet (ala Dale's on LV II).

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 3:14 PM
To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com; stephen.swift@ps.ge.com;
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com;
Lisa.Bills@enron.com; Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com;
Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com
Cc: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call

Dear Turbine Torture Club Members:

The purpose of this email is to confirm that we will have a conference call
this Wednesday, November 29 at 130 CT.  The following items have been
suggested for the agenda:

Form of consent to assignment agreement (draft circulated) - to be used for
LM's and Frames, if possible.
Assignment language - new language being tortured within the Enron ranks,
to GE soon.
Limit of liability, indemnity, etc. - Enron owes GE a position on this.

In addition, it seems to me that the following equipment will be "moving"
soon:

City of Austin LM's (to be assigned to ENA, then NEPCO)
LM's for the ESA project
PSCO, LV CoGen, the remaining LM's, Pastoria, Blue Dog (all to DevCo,
right?)

I suggest that we address any commercial, financial or legal issues
outstanding concerning the assignment of these turbines.

There may be others who need to be involved in the call, and there may be
additional issues.  Please advise.

Thanks,

Kay


Hi Jeff, Aiaz,

Attached is my roommates ebay capstone project I mentioned, figured it would
give us a good
background for the case...it was a last minute project (as i can attest to by
the NO sleep I got
from being in the room next to him the night before the due date :)
so it's a little rough, but good "leisure reading" :)

I don't have Anil's email, so could one of you please forward to him?
Thanks,
Kelly,
still cracking the whip on this project :)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
 - ebay.doc


Melissa,

Here are the accrual values for Q1.  More details to follow.

Jan - $266,504
Feb- $289,305
Mar - $292,145

Eric

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           04/07/2000 01:51 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory L Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wellhead Accrual Income

Eric,

Per Greg Sharp, he and Tom Martin discussed the Wellhead Accrual Income
numbers today, and Effective Q1 2000, Greg will begin recognizing this
accrual income in his financials.

It is my understanding that the new Wellhead Portfolio in Sitara assists you
in calculating this monthly number (which is estimated at $170,000 per
month).  Could you please provide the detail behind this calculation, or if
this data is pulled directly from Sitara, George and I could meet with you to
become familiar with this data extraction process.

Thank you,
Melissa
X39173


Dan --

I will get with Evan and his team and pull this together.  Of course, much of the activity with Utilities is driven by their requirements and judgements (which change over time).

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:19 AM
To:	Hughes, Evan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Performance / Surety Bonds

Jim / Evan -

As you are probably aware, the performance and surety bond market is difficult for us to navigate in and around in our current situation.  As an example, EFS has been shut out of getting access to new bid and performance / payments bonds for its business that requires these.  We are addressing this with the bonding companies now.  All of their existing bonds are in place and in force.

In light of this, I wanted to make sure that we are absolutely current in all aspects of all bonding requirements with UDC's and LDC's.

Please send me the most current copy of your matrix that illustrates where we have existing bonds in place, what drives the capacity requirements, status, renewal / expiration date, current payment status, etc.  I would like to make sure that we are all clear on how these work, what triggers increases / decreases in capacity, and other issues impacting our ability to continue to flow electricity and natural gas to our clients.

Thanks - Dan


Please see the attached summary.

 - 10-26-01.doc


Tim Belden
Trading
503-464-3820 (w)
503-230-1134 (h)
503-701-5181 (c)

Heather Dunton
Risk
503-464-8020 (w)
503-736-3185 (h)
503-703-1441 (c)

John Postlethwaite
Risk
503-464-7756 (w)
503-287-0052 (h)
503-704-9889 (c)


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
3/5/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
3/5/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
3/5/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 827,620.
3/5/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 171,395.
3/5/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 951,273.


As many of you are aware, we have been building capabilities to offer credit
risk management products to our customers on a global basis with initial
focus in Europe and North America.  We are now ready to move to the next
level and begin offering bankruptcy swaps on specific energy and non energy
names.  We anticipate officially launching the business on Wednesday, 23
February with a Press Release and external website called EnronCredit.com.

Prior to making the public announcement, we intend to send a letter to the
respective CFO/Treasurer/Finance Director of the reference credits letting
them know that we will begin making markets in bankruptcy swaps on their
names.  We have worked with Enron's many origination groups to remove names
of customers that are particularly sensitive or where we might have
confidential information.  In anticipation of potential direct feedback to
the account representatives of the referenced entities, please see the
attached list of initial reference credits and have a look at the test
version of the web site at test.enroncredit.com (at certain times during the
test phase, the web site may not be available in all locations).

If you have any questions or comments, please contact either me or  Bryan
Seyfried who is leading the effort  at 44 020 7783 7907.

Thanks!

John


RTO Week

 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Day 4 - October 18, 2001

Afternoon Session

Standardizing Markets, Business, and Other Practices

Panelists for this discussion were:  Sarah Barpoulis, PG&E National Energy Group; William P. Boswell, GISB; Bill Burkes (substituting for David J. Christiano), City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri; David N. Cook, NERC General Counsel; Michael Kormos PJM Interconnection; LeRoy Koppendrayer, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission; and Marty Mennes, Florida Power & Light Company.

General Observations

The Commissioners were all present the majority of the time (Massey left late in the  afternoon).  FERC Staff was active in the discussion; however, the commissioners were very active as well, asking perhaps as much as 70% of all questions.  There was a general consensus that standards were needed; much discussion focused simply on how much and by who. The Commission seemed very interested in leaning what they needed to do to move the industry forward and how far they needed to go.  Panelists urged the need to mover forward as quickly as possible, but both they and FERC seemed to recognize that some of the issues regarding standardized market design and such needed to be addressed before RTOs could really begin to move forward.  There was discussion on identifying which industry group (NERC or GISB) would take the reins in the future.  On an interesting tangential note, there was noticeable conflict between NERC and GISB, with veiled insults between the two organizations somewhat common during the discussions.

FERC Deliverables

A great deal of the discussions focused on identifying what the industry needed from the Commission.  Staffers probed all panelists to find what they felt was critical.

The first major topic was "How many RTOs?  What is their scope?"  All panelists seemed to agree that this question needed to be answered immediately by FERC, in strong definitive language.  N o one offered any specific language, but seemed to be urging FERC to issue a formal statement.

The next topic was, "What will be standard market design?"  Panelists varied on this, but most felt strong guidance from FERC is urgent.  Some urged for one mandatory design for North America, one supported a set of rigid standard designs, one supported a single design with requests for exceptions (followed by an in-depth review process), and one seemed to prefer the current situation.

The commission in general seemed to be very interested in understanding what the industry needed to move forward.  They continually visited this topic throughout their discussions, asking questions like, "Do we need to issue a Mega-Order that addresses all these issues?" and, "How much detail do you need us to provide?"   General feel from the panelsists seemed to be they wanted strong leadership in this areas.  Kormos and Burkes went so far as to say FERC should "Mandate as much as they felt comfortable - and then go a little further."  Others seemed to be a little worried about this idea, but in general did not oppose the concept, citing only general warnings and the need for cautious investigation.

One item of interest: Wood referred to the filing made by the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative and specifically asked if the items identified in the "RTO Design and RTO Implementation" section would address many of the questions and uncertainty facing the industry with regard to RTO design.  Kormos indicated that clear and specific answers to these questions specifying a course of action would go a long way toward guiding the industry.  The section to which Wood referred was one that I wrote, and asked the following questions:

?         Congestion Management - When Operational Security Violations occur, how is the system to be stabilized in a fair and equitable manner that is nonetheless efficient?  Will LMP based systems be standard, or will there be others that must be accommodated?

?         Transmission Service  - Are transmission services required to schedule ("covered" schedules only), or are they risk management tools protecting from congestion charges (both "covered" and "uncovered" schedules are allowed)?

?         Loop Flows  - Are contract-path based or flow-based transmission services appropriate?  If contract-path based, how are parallel path issues to be addressed?

?         Grandfathered Transmission Service - Should contracts existing prior to RTO development be transferred, or is there an equitable way to retire those contracts?  Are there other solutions?

?         Energy Imbalance Markets - How are imbalance markets to function? Will they serve as real-time energy markets (support unbalanced schedules), be limited to supplying needs of imbalance service (require balanced schedules), or will they be required at all?

?         Ancillary Services - Will ancillary service markets be developed in standard ways?  Will entities be required to actually schedule ancillary services (required to schedule), or will they be treated primarily as financial instruments (protecting against real-time POLR charges)?

?         Losses - Can we utilize the imbalance markets to support losses?  Can we create specific loss standards that facilitate the scheduling process, or must we support methods that are currently in tariffs, but technically unwieldy?

?         Non-Jurisdictionals - How are non-jurisdictionals to be integrated into the new world?  Should systems be designed with the assumption that non-jurisdictional will be part of an RTO?  Or should they be designed to treat each NJE as a separate entity?

Hopefully, FERC will use this section as a template to answer these critical questions in an assertive manner, and give some solid direction in which to move. Kormos emphasized the need for concrete answers to these questions, pointing out that vague answers (i.e., "do congestion management") will take a year or two to resolve, but specific answers (i.e., "LMP with financial hedging instruments") will take only months.  The Commission asked Mike about moving forward, and he told them that effectively, it was impossible to move forward with implementation without getting these issues addressed.

Now for a  funny point - One of the commissioners (I think Breathitt) referred to some concerns expressed in the Northwest that their high concentration of hydro power makes LMP inefficient for the Northwest.  Kormos flat out said, "My profession is understanding how power systems work, and I don't believe that that statement is true."  He then backpedaled a bit and said that it would need more study, but he stood by his statement that the assertion by the Northwest interests was false.

NERC and GISB

A great deal of discussion focused around the need for a single standard-setting organization.  Massey went so far as to ask, "Are we looking at a beauty contest between NERC and GISB?"  Cook and Boswell then went into several short polite jabs at each other's organizations.  Other participants continually reiterated the need for ONE, INDEPENDENT organization.  Interestingly, Boswell was very emphatic about the established trust and respect in GISB, while Cook preferred to only talk about the "new" structure of NERC and did not focus on its history.

Brownell offered some not-too-subtle passive support of GISB by pointedly asking both Cook and Boswell if they lobbied political positions (i.e., were they not only an organization but also a stakeholder?).  GISB was easily able to say they were not, but NERC of course had to admit to their romancing of Congress and the Bush administration for reliability legislation. Point, Brownell.

Mennes acted as somewhat of a supporter for NERC, playing Dave Cook's yes-man.  He probably did them a little bit of harm by pointing to NERC's supposed "successes," such as TLR and E-Tag.  If staffers have tenure, they will likely remember that these "successes" have not been so successful, resulting in several filings and interventions.  We may also wish to file comments in specific objection to these claims, to refresh their memory and to show the pretty picture Marty painted was in fact a fiction.

There was a little discussion about splitting reliability and market issues, but general consensus was that I could not be done.  There was also some talk of folding NERC under GISB/EISB.

The arguments began winding down after a some time, and Boswell strongly urged the Commission to speak to industry executives and advocacy group leadership to see whether NERC or GISB should lead the industry forward.  NERC somewhat less enthusiastically supported this position.  In general, I would say it was a close fight but GISB came out more on top.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771


I have not heard anything about this either.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Mark Taylor
	08/04/00 09:26 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ISDA with Citibank Subsidiary

It would be nice if they could give us a counterparty name - I've never heard
of Jerry Peskuchi.

	Tana Jones
	08/04/2000 09:16 AM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA with Citibank Subsidiary

Anyone know anything about this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 09:15 AM -----

	Mary Tudon
	08/04/2000 09:11 AM

		 To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ISDA with Citibank Subsidiary

Everybody,

Tanya suggested I ask all of you if you know anything related to a hotline
call I took yesterday afternoon.  I got a call from John Arnold who wanted to
know who was working on getting an ISDA in place with a subsidiary of
Citibank. He thought it was a hedge fund, he wasn't sure.  He said that they
were getting very impatient to start dealing with us.  He left a contact for
Citibank:  Jerry Peskuchi (212) 723-7065, who wants to be updated on the
status of the master.

Sorry I didn't bring this up in the morning meeting, but please let me know
if any of you know anything about this, because I had no idea who to direct
his call to and could only promise to try and find the right person handling
this and pass the info on.


http://www.hyatt.com/usa/san_diego/hotels/photo_a_sanis.html

here is our new hotel - it is the hyatt islandia

flight number is #1133