[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for YHOO  follows from EquityAlert.com.     GotMarketing Teams with Yahoo! Small Business; Agreement Makes GotMarketings' Campaigner Tools Available to Yahoo! Small Business Users   CAMPBELL, Calif., Oct 24, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- GotMarketing(TM), (www.gotmarketing.com) a leading provider of self-serve email marketing tools, today announced an agreement with Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO), a leading global Internet communications, commerce and media company, to offer GotMarketing's Campaigner(TM)email marketing tools to businesses using Yahoo!(R)Store (http://store.yahoo.com), Yahoo! Website Services (http://website.yahoo.com), and Yahoo! Small Business (http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com).   Through the term of the agreement, Yahoo! will offer a branded, fully integrated version of Campaigner, giving businesses convenient access to the suite of email marketing tools. The agreement gives businesses a fast and cost-effective way of reaching customers to drive sales, build businesses' brands and strengthen customer relationships.   "Our email marketing tools are a convenient, cost-effective way for businesses to send customized marketing pieces," said Eric Melka, Vice President of Marketing and Business Development, GotMarketing. "We are pleased to deliver our email marketing tools and technology to Yahoo!'s small business users to help them cultivate customer relationships in order to increase revenue."   Yahoo!'s self-serve offering of Campaigner includes automated list building, list management, message personalization, campaign distribution, response tracking and real-time reporting, HTML templates, wizards, and tips throughout.   "GotMarketing's email marketing tools add to the suite of tools and services Yahoo! offers businesses to help them reach new customers, save time and money, and grow sales," said Nate Smith, Senior Producer, Yahoo! Small Business. "Our agreement with GotMarketing supports our strategy of offering competitive features and value-added services that help businesses succeed."   Yahoo! Small Business (http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com) offers a suite of resources and solutions to enable small businesses to establish and grow a business presence on the Web. Yahoo! Small Business offers essential solutions such as Yahoo! Store, Yahoo! Mail -- Business Edition, Yahoo! Website Services, and Yahoo! domains that allow small businesses to establish an online presence and sell online. In addition, Yahoo! Small Business helps businesses leverage the Yahoo! network to develop effective online marketing and promotional strategies. Yahoo! Small Business also provides relevant resources such as business planning content and tools, office supply shopping and mailroom resources, as well as pertinent news and information -- all of which help small businesses grow business and manage daily operations.   About GotMarketing  GotMarketing(TM) (www.gotmarketing.com) offers a suite of self-serve email marketing tools that help businesses attract and retain customers. The Campaigner(TM) suite of Web-based software applications makes it easy for organizations with limited marketing resources to create and distribute permission-based email campaigns and measure their performance. The company is headquartered in Silicon Valley, California with offices in Ottawa and Montreal, Canada. For more information, please visit www.gotmarketing.com.   (c)2001 GotCompany, Inc. GotMarketing, Campaigner and GotCompany are trademarks of GotCompany, Inc. Yahoo! and the Yahoo! logos are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Yahoo! Inc. All other names are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of their respective owners.   CONTACT:          GotMarketing                   Carolyn Gardner, 613/727-7588 ext. 284                   Fax - 613/727-9514                   pr@gotmarketing.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS                   E-COMMERCE                   INTERNET                   SOFTWARE                   MARKETING                   AGREEMENTS                   PRODUCT                   SOURCE:                   GotMarketing    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     Sector/Industry Changes  Power Option PLUS Logo     [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 78988 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
  This method can be used on individual folders as well.

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.

To turn Journaling off,
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.

See client Help for more information.


We signed last night with Black Hills Energy Capital.  They have till 5:00PM Thursday to deliver either the LC or the Corp guaranty.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Monday, June 18, 2001 5:39 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise; Schneider, Chip; Colwell, Wes; Deffner, Joseph
Subject:	Southwest Power Update

We are not done.  On Friday when we were prepared to sign, Black Hills Energy Capital said they needed until today to get a signature from their parent, Black Hills Corp.  At noon today they said that the signature was on its way.  At 4:00PM we heard that they will issue a L/C instead of the Corp guarantee.  The L/C approach is fine, but I am concerned with this flaky behavior.

Our plan is to sign the purchase and sale with Black Hills Energy Capital tonight/tomorrow morning.  They would have the obligation to deliver either a gurantee or an L/C for $15MM by Thursday.  If not, we can terminate at any time prior to close of business Monday.  I will update when something changes.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


This request has been pending your approval for  35 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000059240&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000059240
Request Create Date : 9/10/01 2:19:58 PM
Requested For       : ryan.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type       : Applications


Southern Trails proposed, at an estimated cost of $155,000,000, a pipeline
project consisting mostly of 693 miles of crude oil pipeline acquired from
ARCO.  Ten percent of the project would be new construction and the remainder
would be conversion of the crude oil line to gas service.  The pipeline
system would be divided into an East Zone and a West Zone.  The East Zone,
which will begin in the San Juan Basin and end at the California border, will
have 87,500 Dth/d of available capacity.  The West Zone, wholly within
California, will have 120,000 Dth/d.

Southern Trails received certificate authority for the project on July
28,2000.  An optional certificate application does not require any showing of
market need; however, Southern Trails did hold an open season from Sept. to
Oct. 1998 during which it received 22 bids totalling 810,000 Dth/d of
demand.  The order issuing the certificate did not say how much of the
capacity had been subscribed, only that Southern Trails had contracted with
its affiliate, Questar Energy, for 30,000 Dth/d of firm capacity in theh East
Zone for 5 years and one month, and taht firm transportation service
agreements of 5 and 10 year terms are "being negotiated" with prospective
shippers which, if executed, would subscribe the balance of the capacity in
both the East and West zones.

TW is an intervenor in this docket so I have received everything that has
been filed.  I have no further information about any further subscription of
capacity.  I also have no information regarding any progress that has been
made on construction.
If you need a more detailed summary of the proposal that was filed at FERC,
or if you have any other questions, please let me know and I'll see what I
can find.  I've got the entire environmental report in my office if we need
that for any reason!


Cooper-

I cannot run this file.  It keeps prompting me for a password which I don't
have.


Mark, NWP was under the impression that adding the hours would improve the
MAA calculation, and you are saying that it lowered the availability. NWP was
really more concerned with the reasoning behind the note. NWP also asked for
a written explanation of the current method of calculation. I will make sure
that any faults that are not normally associated with weather, but are
related to a weather  event  will be noted on our monthly report. Thanks.

Mark V Walker
04/11/2002 11:34 AM
To: Leonard Mason/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: OH Reference on February Monthly Report

The 3.8 hours was added to the January and not Febuary OH term for WTG 11.
The 3.8 hours was added back because the Emergency Oil Loss was interpreted
by me to be a failure not directly due to the icing.  Icing alone shouldn't
cause an emergency oil loss.  I Added it back in to prevent double counting
of the turbine offlline.  If  the oil loss indication was directly due to
icing then we should lower the MAA availability for turbine 11 in January to
correct for 3.8 hours.   Let me know what you want us to do.

For the future, we analysts will always assume that a failure that occurs
during icing and that isn't reasonably due to icing alone will be treated as
a separate (independent) failure.   Please  indicate clearly in the manual
log that a turbine failure (or apparent failure) was directly related to
icing or other cause if the failure  isn't obviously expected due to icing
alone.  Breakage of anemometer cups is an example of a failure that would
clearly be expected as a result of icing alone.

Leonard Mason
04/09/2002 09:04 AM
To: Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron, Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: OH Reference on February Monthly Report

Mark, you stated 3.8 hours was added to the OH hours of turbine #11 at the
bottom of the OH calculations sheet. I believe this was added because the
Emergency Oil Level Fault was not reset on that machine because of the icing
conditions we were experiencing at the time. Is this correct?


Today, we are forming Enron Global Services (EGS) in order to more closely align our asset-based businesses.

This reorganization will allow EGS to focus our resources on opportunities that present the highest value to Enron.  It will also accomplish the following:  1) enhanced synergies among our assets and personnel, 2) more effective prioritization of business opportunities, and 3) better management of Enron's asset-based businesses throughout the world.

Enron Global Services' energy asset portfolio includes the North American pipeline businesses of Enron Transportation Services (ETS), including Northern Border; the international pipeline, power and distribution operations of Enron Global Assets & Services (EGAS); Portland General Electric; EOTT Energy Corp; Enron Wind; Azurix and Wessex Water.

Reporting to me as the heads of their respective business units are:
?	Jim Hughes, President & COO - EGS/International
?	Danny McCarty, Managing Director & CCO - ETS
?	Bill Cordes, President - Northern Border Partners
?	Peggy Fowler, President & CEO - Portland General Electric
?	John Garrison, President & CEO - Azurix
?	Dana Gibbs, President & COO - EOTT Energy Corp
?	Colin Skellett, CEO - Wessex Water
?	Adam Umanoff, President & CEO - Enron Wind

With the creation of EGS, we hope to enhance the efficient utilization of our commercial support services.  To accomplish this, EGS' staff and operational functions will be headed by:
?	Rod Hayslett, Managing Director & CFO
?	Rob Walls, Managing Director & General Counsel
?	Phil Lowry, Managing Director, Pipeline Operations and Engineering & Construction
?	Brian Stanley, President & CEO - EEOS
?	Steve Hotte, Vice President & CIO
?	John Ambler, Vice President, Communications & PR
?	Gary Smith, Vice President, Human Resources

In addition, Rob Walls will continue to perform his role as Deputy General Counsel for Enron reporting to Jim Derrick.

Phil Lowry will be responsible for domestic pipeline operations, technical services and engineering & construction, as well as, international pipeline technical services and engineering & construction.  Brian Stanley will be responsible for technical services and engineering & construction for international power and distribution facilities.

Below is an organization chart for Enron Global Services, which displays the changes described here.  We are confident this new organization will focus our talent and capital appropriately.  Please join me in supporting this management team as it strives to maximize Enron's return on its assets.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Mike, the other question Michelle had, "Does NNG Contracts have a written procedure for
	approval of this type of contract?  Please check with Linda Trevino.  We are to meet with
	Michelle at 10:30 Friday morning.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winckowski, Michele
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:31 PM
To:	Fancler, Dan; Kirk, Steve; Miller, Kent; Neville, Sue; Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Cobb Jr., John; Chandler, Bob; Kissner, Tim; Brennan, Patrick; Branney, Theresa; Dornan, Dari
Subject:	RE: Transok Offsystem Fuel Accounting Procedure

	I have reviewed to orders issued by FERC.  They state "Pipelines acquiring upstream capacity without prior Commission approval will be "at-risk" for the cost of that capacity".  This means that Northern will need to track both the costs and revenues associated with offsystem transactions.  We believe that in tracking the revenues we can track by contract.

	Therefore, I believe in the meeting that if we needed to track these transactions Sue's group would maintain a manual spreadsheet for all off-system transactions.

	We also said Dan Fancler would need to review and determine how we would track the revenues thru the accounting side.

	I believe we have provided the answers we committed to in the meeting yesterday for today.  I plan to meet with Lynn B. tomorrow to discuss nominations, contract approval processes and other stuff.....  I'll let you know where we are as things develop.  thanks MW

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fancler, Dan
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Winckowski, Michele; Kirk, Steve; Miller, Kent; Neville, Sue; Williams, Jo; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Cobb Jr., John; Chandler, Bob; Kissner, Tim; Brennan, Patrick
Subject:	Transok Offsystem Fuel Accounting Procedure

Based on our meeting 10/9/2001, I would like to propose the following accounting procedures for expensing in-kind fuel.

Case A:  In October 500,000 dts moves offsystem with only 486,000 dts expected to be returned to NNG in January.

NNG moves 500,000 dts from physical inventory to Offsystem inventory. No accounting entry made to the G/L.

Gas Accounting would reduce Offsystem inventory 14,000 dts to reflect in-kind fuel reduction in the same month the next NNG gas purchase transaction occurs (FIFO inventory method).  Reducing the Offsystem storage will cause UAF to increase, however purchasing gas for Operational Storage and not recording it to Operational Storage will offset the UAF increase.  If the next gas purchase transaction occurs in December at $3.00 then we would reduce Offsystem Storage Inventory by 14,000 dts in December production.  December UAF would not be affected.

Recorded in December:
Debit 858 3rd Party Transport exp		14,000 * $3.00 = $42,000
	Credit A/P							($42,000)

Procedural Note:  All Third Party Offsystem storage statements must be forwarded to Gas Accounting (Dan Fancler) in order to reconcile the Physical to the Books.  Reconciling items such as in-kind fuel reductions will be reported to Storage Marketing noting that purchases for in-kind fuel replacements are needed.

If NNG purchases 100,000 dt for Operational Storage in December, then 14,000 dts would be carved out as in-kind fuel replacement and recorded to 858 (3rd party transport), the remaining 86,000 dts would be recorded as Operational Storage purchase and encroachment.  We may wish for the vender to issue two invoices.

Case B	 In October 500,000 dts moves offsystem, NNG purchases the in-kind replacement on Transok's system and 500,000  dts is expected to be returned to NNG in January.

NNG moves 500,000 dts from physical inventory to Offsystem inventory. No accounting entry made to the G/L.
NNG does not reduce the offsystem physical inventory.

Recorded in month of purchase on Transok's system:
Debit 858 3rd Party Transport exp		14,000 * $3.00 = $42,000
	Credit A/P							($42,000)

In both cases all transactions are recorded outside of operational storage, but gives Marketing some flexibility on when the in-kind replacement takes place but still follows a logical methodology (FIFO replacement).


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Kerry Harrington
Expense Report Name: Houston to Birmingham
Report Total: $1,394.90
Amount Due Employee: $1,394.90
Amount Approved: $1,394.90
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Pre-Approved
Payment Status: Authorized

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


- MVC-003S.JPG
 - MVC-011S.JPG
 - MVC-013S.JPG
 - MVC-019S.JPG


Starting on Thursday,  April 19, at 2:00 p.m. there will be a weekly telephone conference for the California litigation team.  The objective will be to identify key issues and plan a coordinated strategy for all litigation in California.  The call will last not more than one hour.

	Thus far, the responsibility has been allocated as follows:

1.	PG&E Bankruptcy 		Lisa Mellencamp and Carl Ecklund (LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & McRae)

2.	Class Actions			Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs (Gibbs & Bruns)

3.	CTC Matters			Bob Williams, Mike Day and Gary Fergus (Brobeck)

4.	FERC Matters		 	Regulatory and Richard Sanders and Dan Watkiss (Bracewell & Patterson)

5.	Government Investigations	Regulatory and Richard Sanders

	Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs will have overall responsibility for coordination of the litigation.


I am out of the office  and will be returning Monday, November 26.  If you need immediate assistance with respect to power transactions, please contact Tracy Ngo, Ed Sacks, Wendy Conwell, or Kortney Brown.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
06:04 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/01/2000 04:36 PM
To: vkaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: papers


Here are today's Secretary Richardson's FERC comments regarding California
electricity markets as discussed in the Wall Street Journal.  FERC is not
required by law to treat the Secretary's comments differently from any other
intervener.  DOE is interested in our comments to their filing. thanks.

 - calfile.wpd


Rob,

Thanks for approving those products, but I still need Exxon Katy for Jan01
approved.

Thanks,

Eric


There are Unresolved/Open items in the vendor payables system (iPayIt) and employee reimbursement system (XMS).  Employees are strongly encouraged to resolve items in their inboxes.  Please either process and approve, or reject these outstanding business expenses in your inboxes by 2:00 p.m. Monday, December 3, 2001.

For assistance with XMS please contact:
Enron Travel Management
(713) 345-6252, enron travel@enron.com <mailto:travel@enron.com>.

For assistance with iPayIt please contact:
Integrated Solutions Center
(713) 345-4727, iPayit@enron.com <mailto:iPayit@enron.com>


I'M LOOKING TOO!!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Quenet, Joe [mailto:Joe.Quenet@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Knock, John
Subject:

LOOKING FOR $16 CAL 02 DAILY PUT.     $1.00 BID FOR SIZE !

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


To:		All Enron Employees

From:	Raymond Bowen, Jr.
		EVP, Finance & Treasurer

Subject:	Update on Employee Expense Reimbursement

Post-Petition Expenses

Effective immediately, the processing of expense reimbursement for business expenses incurred by employees after Enron Corp.'s Chapter 11 filing (after December 2nd) has returned to normal.  Expenses will be reimbursed promptly upon submission.  Employees should conduct business travel in the ordinary course of business as approved by direct supervisors.  New travel and entertainment guidelines regarding business travel and other employee expenses will be forthcoming.  In the meantime, please use discretion as you incur expenses.  All expenditures should be made with consideration given to Enron's current financial situation.

Pre-Petition Expenses

We will immediately begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses for current and former employees (incurred prior to the December 2nd Chapter 11 filing) up to a maximum of $5,000.  We understand that a number of employees have pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  However, under the first day orders of the bankruptcy court, there is a $15,000 allowance per employee for unpaid pre-petition compensation, benefits, and related employee expenses.  This $15,000 cap was imposed without input from Enron management and counsel.  We have sought clarification from the bankruptcy court to assure that this $15,000 cap does NOT include the reimbursement of medical, dental, or vision related expenses.

We have commenced a manual review of every individual with pending pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000.  Even prior to clarification from the court regarding the medical/dental/vision expense issue, we will begin to reimburse pre-petition expenses in excess of $5,000 and up to $15,000 as soon as we can verify that the aggregate reimbursements to an individual employee have not exceeded the $15,000 cap.  Unfortunately, since this will be a manual process, it will take some time to work through.  Employees with pre-petition business expenses in excess of $5,000 can assist us with this manual review process by providing a brief email summary of their situation, including the total amount of pending pre-petition medical/dental/vision claims, to expensereport@enron.com.

Thank you for your patience.


Well, will discuss that later.  Call me whenever you want.  Mat


Voicemail from Ken?


Tom:

We have our own form of corporate resolutions.  It was being circulated for signature by the directors and I just received it back today.  I told Kelly Keneally when I sent the documentation to her that we were in the process of routing this for signature and that I would send her a certificate certifying these resolutions when completed.

Marie

-----Original Message-----
From: Doukas, Tom
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie
Subject: FW: CORP RES AUTH INDIV DOC

Apparently CSFB neglected to ask us to complete the attached corporate resolution when we executed the broker agreement.  If we could fill out and forward on that would be great.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Keneally, Kelly [mailto:kelly.keneally@csfb.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Doukas, Tom
Subject: FW: CORP RES AUTH INDIV DOC

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Slattery, Daniel
> Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:46 PM
> To:	Keneally, Kelly
> Subject:	CORP RES AUTH INDIV DOC
>
>  <<corpres.pdf>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Daren , There seems to be two noms that are not in the system that need to be
nomed from the first on.  Ames meter 5077 and senora meter 6686.  both had
thckets that were not extended into april.


Minana for Trent ATP is loaded.

There was no data for Turbine #98.  The Minana file in Folder 98 is for
Turbine 97.

Only 106 records were recovered for Turbine #31

Only 616 records were recovered for Turbine #85

Turbine #2, 42, 74 had to also be rebuilt.

---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron on 04/16/2002
04:13 PM ---------------------------

Mark Fisher
04/16/2002 10:08 AM
To: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Cousineau/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Alaadin Suliman/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis
Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Patricia Hunter/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Trent Mesa ATP

Ron,

The data for the Trent ATP is being uploaded and I have taken a quick look.
For the data already uploaded 24,25, and 27 don't look good for the 24 hour
period. I will look for a previous 24 hour period for just those turbines
(though that does not seem to be valid in the context of the test). For
turbines 31 and 90 I will do the same otherwise the loss of 2 hours of data
will drop the recovery  to 92%.

Here are some graphs to look at. Our data loading priority is changing and
that could affect how fast the remaining data will be uploaded.

Mark Fisher

Ronald Brzezinski on 04/15/2002 03:51:45 PM
To: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Trent Mesa ATP

---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 04/15/2002
04:04 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Realty Advisors

	From:  Alaadin Suliman                           04/15/2002 11:33 AM

To: Mark Fischer/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Kevin Cousineau/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON,
Stanley Tehee/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Trent Mesa ATP

Hi Mark,
I did the ATP for SCADA system in Trent on April 13th at 11:40am (CT) 4:40pm
(UTC), it lasted for 24hours. I collected the database files from all the
turbines.
The following is the observations for the data collected:
Turbines no. 47 & 48 were under major repairs and were not included on the
ATP, so total number if turbines is 98..
During the night of the test turbines no. 24,25, & 27 stopped collecting
data, and I reset Visupro application in the morning, so there is a 10 hours
worth of data lost, I suggest we shift the starting time of the test for only
these turbines so we can get 24hours of data.
Turbine no. 31 has some repairs done to it during the night of the test and I
didn't have notice of these repairs, I managed to capture the data for the
24hours test in four seperate files, two files minana.db and minana_2.db for
the 10 minute average and statdat.db and stadat_2.db for the status. I
believe there is 2 hours worth of data still missing.
Turbine no. 90, kept rebooting in the morning and I had to go to the turbine
and restart the PC, it worked fine for the rest of the day but there is 2
hours worth of data missing.
Other than that the data looks fine for all the rest of the turbine.
I am transfering the files right now to your folder on the transfer server,
the folder name is SCADA ATP Trent, and also I will UPS to you by overnight
delivery the data on a CD.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 661-332-6348, I will
be in Indian Mesa site until Saturday.
Regards,
Alaadin


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000
05:50 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           06/16/2000 05:38 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Models

I will be in the office on Tuesday morning.  Hopefully we can meet amongst
ourselves and then Shankman to discuss progress and next steps.

Thanks,

Eric

Eric's "book" model

Enron - LNG Project NPV model

Please see notes below.  Let me know if you have any questions,
Marg.  mb) 713-408-7961

************************************************************
A few notes:

Summary:  See columns F,G, and H
ENE Cash Inflow:  (Henry Hub + Basis at Elba {Lake Ch was left out of the
analysis, see below}) x Unloaded volumes coming from Qatar, Algeria, &
Venezuela
ENE Cash Outflow:  Fixed & Escalating COS at Elba + Fixed & O&M Charter Hires
for the Newbuild & Hoegh Galleon + Variable terminaling costs at Elba +
Voyage costs on the ships + FOB paid to Qatar, Algeria & Venezuela

Henry Hub Gas Price:  Set to $3.55 through 2003, but then dropped to
$2.90/MMBtu.  You can customize this column as you choose.

Loaded vs. Unloaded:  Revenues are on loaded volumes, Costs are on unloaded
volumes.  I had the unloaded / loaded percentage for both Newbuild and Hoegh
for both Algeria & Qatar.  I didn't have them for Venezuela so I just
extrapolated based on the number of days it took to go round trip. Galleon To
come up with unloaded volumes, I just multiplied the percentage (unloaded /
loaded) by the loaded volume.

Lake Charles:  I started to include this in the analysis, but in the end,
left it out... I don't think we need it unless we want to model spot cargoes
pre-Elba (pre-4/1/02) in the future.   Adding it doubled the complexity of
everything.  So, for all practical purposes, it doesn't impact the analysis
at all -- you'll see that all the Lake Ch costs are zero.

Ship Usage:  I know you told me to run 50% coming from Algeria, 50% coming
from Qatar.  However, you can get more volumes to Elba if you take 7.6
cargoes/yr from Qatar (running the Hoegh Galleon to its max) and 13.9
cargoes/yr from Algeria (not the full capacity of the Newbuild, but the max
of the Elba terminal capacity).  Thus, this is how it's been modeled.
However, you won't see the volumes on the Newbuild until 1/1/03 (when the
charter starts? -- this is changeable in cell M26 {when you start shipping
volumes from Algeria to Elba via NB} and both AC25 and AD25 {when you start
incurring charter costs for the NB}).  Regarding shipping from Venezuela, you
could either run the volumes from Venezuela using the Newbuild or the Hoegh
Galleon.  I chose the Newbuild b/c its voyage costs were cheaper.  The fixed
costs are there regardless of which ship you choose.

Shipping Voyage Costs:  The voyage costs in $/MMBtu are calculated from the
voyages from Algeria (for the Newbuild) and Qatar (for the Hoegh Galleon) to
Elba.  The Newbuild voyage costs should drop on 1/1/04 when the volumes start
coming from Venezuela (rather than Algeria), but they aren't currently
modeled that way.

FOB to Qatar/Algeria/VZ:  This got a little complicated so I just plugged in
some fixed numbers.  $1.00/MMBtu to both Qatar and Algeria, $2.30/MMBtu to
Venezuela.

NPV Calcs:  I've done some, but delete them if you wish.

***********************************************************


We have been successfully transacting the USD/CAD products on EOL. We now
need to add USD/JPY products. Gary's timeline is 2 weeks. These will probably
be USD/JPY forwards with internal counterparties. Sara, I will send an e-mail
tommorrow with the product description.

Thanks in advance.

W. Stuart


See the following note from Level 3 Communications on their presentation
tomorrow for all UC students (Engineers, Operations Research PhD's,
Haas MBA's and undergrads).

The atypical location and time are due to the broader audience.

No sign-ups required for this presentation.

Sorry for the late notice.

Rich

Rich Wong
Account Manager, Technology
Haas Career Center

****************************************************************************
***************************************

Where: University of California, Berkeley, Alumni House, Bechtel Room

When: Tuesday, October 3, 2000, 12:00 pm (Lunch will be provided)

Come find out why Level 3 Communications is one of the fastest growing
"next-generation" data communications providers in the world. It,s unique
business strategy - to build the world,s first continuously upgradeable
all-IP network - is so compelling Wall Street has raised over $13 billion in
debt & equity to support it. Yet our $32 billion market cap is less than 2%
of the estimated $2 trillion market cap attributed to our marketplace - a
marketplace we plan to dominate. Our Outperformance Stock Option plan
rewards us with multiples of value for beating the S&P 500 index. Now THAT,s
upside.

The Level 3 team has grown from a handful of senior executives to a dynamic
group of recent top tier MBA's, ex-consultants, ex-bankers, ex-telecom
professionals and e-commerce entrepreneurs who share the exuberance and
excitement that comes from building a company from scratch. The difference
is that we are in a market with real revenues, real assets and real
challenges. You won,t stand on the sidelines as we make this happen. MBA's
serve in key roles and are responsible for projects vital to the company,s
success. Our headquarters sits on a brand new campus in Broomfield,
Colorado; 20 minutes from Denver and 10 minutes from Boulder. So forget
consulting, investment banking and the latest dot.com "someday we will make
money" business plan. Join the company that is already collecting checks
from most of the dot.com community. They call in "paying for bandwidth," we
call it our bread and butter.

Positions Available: (2nd years)

Manager, Corporate Development (North America, Europe and Asia)

Manager, Corporate Finance (North America)

Manager, Strategic Alliances (North America and Europe)

Manager, Strategic Finance (North America)

Manager, Strategic Marketing and Operations (North America)

Positions are the same for Summer Associates (1st years). Process begins in
January 2001.

Forward all resumes and cover letters to:

Evelyn W. Jones
Manager, College Recruiting
1025 Eldorado Boulevard
Broomfield, CO 80021
(720) 888-2439 direct
(720) 888-5581 fax


Richard, please review and comment asap.  Mark


Mary:

Deal #487040 has been setup with demand charge equally to the amounts that
Teco paid HPL at Indian Spring for the following months:

August & September 1999
February, March, & April 2000

If you have any questions, let me know.

Thanks, Clem

Mary Poorman@ENRON
11/14/2000 08:54 AM
To: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Indian Springs

I need HPL Sales and Purchases, back dated to 8/99 between HPL and TECO to
book any processing revenue or losses.  Apparently this is in addition to the
current deal in place and is priced at at different rate.  Please let me know
when these tickets are in place so that I can get track id's and finalize
this issue.

Thank you,

Mary


The following contracts are now available on Livelink.

Contract #			Counterparty				Contract Type
96079908			Lexco Data Systems, Inc.		Administrative or Other (Geographic Site License Agmt)

96068933			Martin Twist Energy Co. L.L.C.		Master Purchase Firm & Spot


Steve,

I shall call you tomorrow about it. My preference is to move Anjam to Houston
for some time. Anjam knows a lot about our business and specific positions
and it's better to prevent a potential leak. I have discussed this issue
with Dale and Richard  and  they concurred.

I don't  expect Anjam to act irrationally but it's better to be safe than
sorry.

Vince

Steven Leppard
08/02/2000 03:08 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Contingencies

Hi Vince

If you're currently engaged in drawing up contingency plans for the Anjam
situation, have you arranged for a "snapshot" of his computer directories to
be taken?  We all tend to use our personal areas (on our H: drives) for
development, and obviously there'll be a few years of work in Anjam's
directories.  I wouldn't want him to wipe it all out in a fit of bad temper.
Although our IT dept. obviously makes backups, I don't know how long they are
kept for.

Cheers,
Steve


I am happy to meet with them.  We will want them to meet Jim Derrick as
well.  Mark

	Peter Keohane
	02/12/2001 02:39 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Donahue Ernst & Young

As you know, Donahue E&Y has been doing work for us lately, so far on the
retail, regulatory, and general corporate fronts.  I also believe they have
the ability to work for us in a broader capacity.  E&Y is generally among the
best situated for the coming deregulated power market.  E&Y set up many of
our systems in Toronto and Donahue E&Y is currently assisting us on the
wholesale side with Ontario Energy Finance Corporation (one of the
deregulation off-shoots of Ontario Hydro) on finalizing the NUG management
arrangement.  They are also very strong on tax, and may be able to assist
non-ECC business units (i.e. Global Markets and EES) in Canadian
initiatives.  Representatives of their firm are considering a trip to Houston
in the Spring and asked me if they could visit with you and others within
Enron in Houston.  I told them that we would be pleased, once the timing is
right.  Once they have a date I will let you know to see if we can set
something up. Peter.


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
09:11 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           10/30/2000 04:32 PM

To: Alex Mcleish/EU/Enron@Enron, Phil Clifford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Fuller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Caroline
Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Sieminski Presentation from WEFA Energy Conference 2000 DB

People:
This is DB's presenation on the gas and oil markets. It has some interesting
insights.
Jen

 - Sieminski_DB Alex Brown.pdf


Everyone,

You probably have already heard on the news that there is a new Computer Virus out on the internet that is causing Corporations to experience numerous problems.  We have an automated process to update our workstations with the latest virus protection updates.   However, there may be some machines that didn't get the update.  In order to prevent this virus from infecting your machine, please assist by doing one of the following tasks.

1.  Logout of the network and log back in or
2.  Click on START>PROGRAMS>ACCESSORIES>Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition and then click the Live Update button.  This will pop up a screen where you will have to click the "Next" button and then a "Finish" button.

The proper version of the update pattern you need is:   (9/18/2001, version 30918v)

If you have questions or concerns, please direct them to your Resolution Center.

Enron Global Technology


Want a NEW high speed computer?

866 MHz Pentium III Processor FAST enough?

Want High Speed internet?
Broadband,
Cable Modem,
DSL,
Satellite.

Then Get READY...
All Eligible U.S. Employees get innovative at HOME beginning March, 2001.

Go to http://clickathome.enron.com to LEARN more about the offerings.

Non-U.S. Eligible Employees get innovative at home beginning late 2001 and
2002.


FYI, the only people who knew who we invited to the meeting (but did not
attend) were Dick Riordan and Kevin Sharer...

Saturday, May 26, 2001 (SF Chronicle)
Enron's secret bid to save deregulation/PRIVATE MEETING: Chairman pitches his
plan to prominent Californians
Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers

   Energy executive Kenneth Lay, head of powerful Enron Corp., quietly
courted Arnold Schwarzenegger, Richard Riordan, Michael Milken and other
luminaries this week in Beverly Hills to drum up support for his solution
to California's energy crisis.
   His prescription called for more rate increases, an end to state and
federal investigations and less rather than more regulation.
   Lay, a close friend of President Bush and one of his largest campaign
contributors, hosted a private 90-minute meeting in a conference room at
the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills on Thursday.
   Among the participants were Milken, the former head of the Drexel Burnham
Lambert investment banking firm who pleaded guilty to fraud charges in
1990 and who now runs a think tank based in Santa Monica; movie star
Schwarzenegger;
   and Riordan, the mayor of Los Angeles. Schwarzenegger and Riordan have
been courted recently as GOP gubernatorial candidates.
   One participant, who agreed to speak on the condition he not be
identified, said the meeting appeared to be geared toward getting
participants to support Lay's vision and then champion it to officials who
are trying to solve the state's energy mess.
   PLAN TO RESCUE DEREGULATION
   The source said the timing and tone of the meeting suggested Lay is
concerned that California will abandon its disastrous experiment with
power markets by either re-regulating the system or creating a government
authority to provide electricity. Gov. Gray Davis signed legislation last
week to create and fund a state power authority that would build, buy and
run power plants in California.
   "They're trying to rescue deregulation," the source said of Enron
executives. "They think the whole state power authority is a bad idea."
   At the meeting, Enron representatives circulated a four-page position
paper titled "Comprehensive Solution for California," which was obtained
by The Chronicle. It said ratepayers should bear responsibility for the
billions in debt incurred by the state's public utilities and that
investigations of power price manipulation and political rhetoric are
making matters worse.
   The paper made no mention of the possibility that much of the runaway
electricity costs in California is due to market manipulation by power
generators and traders -- a possibility given credibility in studies by
regulators and economists.
   One of the talking points read: "Get deregulation right this time --
California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers."
Another point suggested giving consumers monetary rebates for conserving
electricity.
   INVOLVED IN EARLY DAYS
   Lay has been an aggressive champion of deregulated electricity markets and
was an early advocate in persuading California to begin its experiment
with a competitive power market system.
   Lay has created a new kind of company in the process, one that essentially
produces nothing but makes money as a middle-man, buying electricity from
generators and selling it to consumers. During the first quarter of this
year, Enron's revenues increased 281 percent to $50.1 billion.
   Asked about the purpose of the meeting, Karen Denne, a spokeswoman for
Enron, said she would "look into that" and then did not return repeated
telephone calls seeking comment. One participant said Denne was present at
the meeting.
   D.C. CONNECTIONS
   Meanwhile, Lay's power in Washington is reported to have reached
unprecedented heights. According to a story in yesterday's New York Times,
Lay supplied the Bush administration with a list of candidates for jobs
regulating the power industry and even interviewed one of them. The story
also said Lay essentially threatened to seek the removal of the chairman
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Curt Hebert, if he does not
support Lay's desire to further deregulate the nation's electricity
system. Lay denied the allegation.
   Also in attendance at this week's meeting were Bruce Karatz, chief
executive of home builder Kaufman & Broad; Ray Irani, chief executive of
Occidental Petroleum; and Kevin Sharer, chief executive of biotech giant
Amgen.
   Among those who were invited but did not attend were former Los Angeles
Lakers star Earvin "Magic" Johnson; supermarket magnate and Bill Clinton
supporter Ron Burkle; and Dennis Tito, recently returned from the world's
first civilian space trip.
   Milken, through a spokesman, confirmed that he attended the meeting, but
declined to be interviewed. Schwarzenegger could not be reached for
comment through a publicist, and Sharer did not return a call yesterday
afternoon.
   A spokesman for Riordan, Peter Hidalgo, said the Los Angeles mayor
attended,
   but was "not intending to formulate any kind of policy position on this
issue.
   His intent is to listen to all sides."
   Attached to the Enron handout was a two-page open letter, addressed to
Davis and the state Legislature, apparently prepared for those who support
Lay's position and would be willing to sign their names to it. The source
who participated in the meeting said those assembled appeared noncommittal
and asked a number of questions of Lay, but did not agree to champion his
agenda.
   E-mail the writers at cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at
swinokur@sfchronicle.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 SF Chronicle


Please place on your calendars.  I will be taking names....:)

adr
Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Harris, Steven; Dowd, Stephen; Hayes, Robert; Kilmer III, Robert; Gadd, Eric
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Winters, Ricki; Robertson, Audrey; Kovalcik, Tammy; Paschal, Zelda; Wadle, Susan
Subject:	FW: Floor meeting with Stan Horton

Please note the floor meeting with Stan on Wednesday.  Please forward this message to your respective groups.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Stan Horton.@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Danny McCarty - Houston@ENRON
Subject:	Floor meeting with Stan Horton

Please join me for an open discussion floor meeting on Wednesday, November 7, at 2:30 pm on the 39th floor near EB3922.

This will be an opportunity for me to update you on what is currently happening within Enron, EGS and ETS, as well as an opportunity for me to answer any questions you have.

I look forward to seeing you there, and thank you for your continued hard work and support of our company.

Stan


let's go with dad in april.  you can go with those guys anytime.  plus you
will probably want to go again after we get back.


Chautauqua (shuh-TO-kwuh, chuh-) noun

   An annual summer school offering education in the form of public lectures
   and cultural activities, often held outdoors.

[After Chautauqua, the name of a lake and county in southwestern New York
state where such a program originated in 1874.]

   "In this Chautauqua I would like not to cut any new channels of
   consciousness but simply dig deeper into old ones that have become
   silted in with the debris of thoughts grown stale and platitudes too
   often repeated."
   Robert M. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, 1974.

No matter where we stand on miles and miles of this earth, they all afford
an equally wondrous view of the stars. Yet the age-old wisdom tells us there
are three important things to look for when the aim is to call a few yards
of this land ours: location, location, location. And location is what we want
to pay attention to when it comes to this week's words for they all came from
the names of some locations. They are known as toponyms, words derived from
places.

Whether it's when we drink champagne (from Champagne, France), make a
solecism (after Soloi, an Athenian colony in Cilicia), or when we meet our
Waterloo (Waterloo, Belgium) we are (perhaps unknowingly) alluding to a
distant land and its history. This week's words take us to New York, Rome,
Ireland, Germany, and the Mediterranean.                            -Anu

Today's AWAD is brought to you by NannyTax, Inc., providing tax compliance
services to employers of domestic help. For useful information and a free
consultation, please visit: http://www.nannytax.com

............................................................................
There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed by
ridicule, howsoever poor and witless. -Mark Twain, author and humorist
(1835-1910)

This is a reader-supported publication. If you'd like to contribute,
visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/friends.html . Send your comments to
anu@wordsmith.org. To unsubscribe, subscribe, change address, or to send
a gift subscription, visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscriber.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/chautauqua.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/chautauqua.ram


The ALJ issued his initial decision on the CPUC complaint case today.  As was widely expected, he found that El Paso and its merchant affiliate, El Paso Merchant, were guilty of affiliate abuse.  However, he did not find clear evidence that they were exercising market power.

The ID is attached.


Following is PNGC's Response to Data Request DS-PN:002.

R. Erick Johnson PC
888 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 870
Portland, OR ?97204
Tel: 503.295.2944
E-mail: ?Erick_Johnson@PNGC.com

	Paul Murphy <bferranti@mbllp.com>

	03/08/2001 09:32 AM
	Please respond to bferranti
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?abuckley@wutc.wa.gov, alan@epud.org,
ali.rodol@ci.seattle.wa.us, archive-power-ratecase@bpa.gov,
aw_turner@pgn.com, BASSL@sce.com, bessex@cowlitzpud.org, bferranti@mbllp.com,
bpadiscovery@merkellaw.com, ccopatrny@e-z.net, clatspud@clatskanie.com,
crow@millernash.com, cub@teleport.com, cwagers@dcpud.org, dan.meek@usa.net,
darcy@tonkon.com, darkills@popud.com, dbkinnard@pplmt.com, dfaulk@puget.com,
discoveryparalegal@bpa.gov, dldorrell@stoel.com, dmacgregor@morganlewis.com,
doney@doneylaw.com, doug_brawley@pngc.com, dparrish@prmllp.com,
dws@keywaycorp.com, eauverde@hotmail.com, eboyd@ppcpdx.org,
efinklea@energyadvocates.com, elisaCKF@aol.com, EnerGlaw@aol.com,
Eric.Larson@oremetwahchang.com, erick_johnson@pngc.com,
ghuhta@cowlitzpud.org, huse@eesconsulting.com, ias@dvclaw.com,
jack.speer@alcoa.com, jacksonc@ida.net, janet.prewitt@state.or.us,
jdeason@chbh.com, jeffn@subutil.com, jhart! so@enron.com, JLH@mc-power.com,
johk@critfc.org, john.yanov@eweb.eugene.or.us, johncameron@dwt.com,
jolynnr@mresearch.com, jpw@duncanallen.com, jrb_ora@televar.com,
jsaven@pacifier.com, jschlect@avistacorp.com, kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us,
kknitte@gcpud.org, kmoxness@cencoast.com, kpom@mail.pacifier.com,
kyle@ppcpdx.org, lawyer@teleport.com, Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com,
lpeters@pacifier.com, lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, lyn_williams@pgn.com,
marc.hellman@state.or.us, marss@perkinscoie.com, matts1@atg.wa.gov,
mershanlaw@aol.com, mhain@ect.enron.com, michaelearly@earthlink.net,
mike.macdougall@powerex.com, mmetzler@ci.tacoma.wa.us,
mschaff@worldnet.att.net, mthomas@mtpower.com, Paul@KinergyLLC.com,
pete.forsyth@kaiseral.com, pete@ashland.or.us, peter@richardsonandoleary.com,
pfox@bracepatt.com, pljacklin@stoel.com, pmurphy@mbllp.com,
pnichols@idahopower.com, pobenchain@idahopower.com, pspi@dynegy.com,
pvickery@tpud.org, rachel@rnp.org, ratecase@pngc.com, rates@ppcpdx.org,
rbstron! g@painehamblen.com, rdb@keywaycorp.com, rfoiani@gcpud.org,
rkindley@schwabe.com, rle@givenspursley.com, rpierce@avistaenergy.com,
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com, seligman@teleport.com, simonf@atg.wa.gov,
sjohnsto@wutc.wa.gov, skaravit@ci.tacoma.wa.us, stephens@eslerstephens.com,
steve@nwenergy.org, tdeboer@painehamblen.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com,
tgrim@chbh.com, townsend@chbh.com, tracigrundon@dwt.com,
tstevenson@ci.burbank.ca.us, weavertr@yakima-wa.com, wmgt3@montana.com
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?WP-02 Data Request

request_number: ?DS-PN:002
firstname: ?Paul
lastname: ?Murphy
e-mail: ?bferranti@mbllp.com
directed_to: ?R. Erick Johnson, PNGC
exhibit_wp-02-e-: ?JCG-01, -02
page_numbers: ?
request_text: ?Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2001 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below
and any representative of any other party concerning BPA's rates to be in
effect for Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

Bob Proctor ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Tim McCoy
Byrne Lovell
Byron Keep
Valerie Lefler
Jon Wright
Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below. ?With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel). ?For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? With respect to written communications, the Request includes
communications in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including,
without limitation, e-mails), or whatever form. ?For such communications,
"disclose and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical
versions of any written communications and to describe with particularity the
location where such communications were found and/or stored, including the
identity of the individual with possession or control of the written
communications; to describe with particularity the circumstances under which
they were generated or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce"
any oral communications made in connection with the written communications
consistent with the preceding paragraph. ?For purposes of this Request, you
need not produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part
of the official ! file in the rate case.

response_text: ?Response DS-PN:002

Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative (PNGC) objects to this Data Request
on the grounds that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks
information that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce. ?Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b). ?PNGC further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it
is in improper form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the
specific use to which the information sought will be put. ?Special Rules of
Practice, WP-02-01. ?Further, the Data Request PNGC received in hard copy of
March 12, 2001 covered communications from October 16, 2001 to the present,
of which there were none. ?PGNC hereby responds to the corrected Data
Requests received March 14, 2001 covering communications from October 16,
2000 to the present. Without waiving the foregoing objections, PNGC responds
as follows:

1. ? ? ? ?On or about January 26, 2001, Joe Nadal, PNGC, called Barney Keep,
BPA, in the afternoon and spoke with Mr. Keep for about five minutes. ?Mr.
Nadal stated that PNGC had concerns relating to the practical feasibility of
implementation details of proposed versions of LB CRAC methodology, i.e.
ability to get transparent monthly price quotes. ?No specific details or
alternatives were discussed. ?Mr. Nadal stated PNGC's interest in having BPA
and utility traders/schedulers attend an upcoming ?work session to give their
input. ?To the best of PNGC's knowledge, no other parties participated in
this telephone conversation.

2. ? ? ? ?On or about January 29, 2001, Joe Nadal, PNGC, called Ed Bleifus,
BPA, in the morning and spoke with Mr. Bleifus for about five minutes. ?Mr.
Nadal again stated that PNGC had concerns relating to the practical
feasibility of implementation details of proposed versions of LB CRAC
methodology, i.e. ability to get transparent monthly price quotes. ?Again, no
specific details or alternatives were discussed. ?Mr. Nadal reiterated PNGC's
interest in having BPA and utility traders/schedulers attend an upcoming
?work session to give their input. ?To the best of PNGC's knowledge, no other
parties participated in this telephone conversation.

3. ? ? ? ?On or about February 13, 2001, Erick Johnson, attorney for PNGC,
called Peter Burger, BPA OGC, at about 11:45 am, and spoke with Mr. Burger
for about three minutes. ?Mr. Johnson asked whether BPA would take the
position that the provisions of the "Partial Stipulation and Settlement
Agreement," WP-02-M-111, Exhibit A, Parties' Proposal, Section H, would
preclude PNGC from offering direct testimony the the first 990 aMW of DSI
service should be priced at market. ?Mr. Burger did not initially answer this
question. ?However, at about 1:40 pm on the same day, Mr. Burger called back
to say that BPA agreed that the Partial Stipulation did not preclude PNGC
from offering such testimony. ?This conversation lasted about two minutes.
?To the best of Mr. Johnson's knowledge, no other persons participated in
these telephone calls.

4. ? ? ? ?On or about February 23, 2001, Phill Sher, PNGC, had a conversation
with A. Perino, BPA, starting at about 11:30 am and lasting about one hour.
The topics discussed were not specifically related to the BPA WP-02 rate
case. The terms "cost recovery adjustment charge" or "CRAC" did not arise to
the best of Mr. Sher's recollection. Also, to the best of Mr. Sher's
recollection, the topics discussed were matters of general interest to
economists. ?The topics discussed included commodity prices and load
forecasting. ?

5. ? ? ? ?On or about March 6, 2001, Doug Brawley, PNGC, left a voice mail
message for Bob Procter, BPA, starting at about 3:00 pm and lasting about two
minutes. ?Mr. Brawley pointed out that in GRSPs Section Q- Low Density
Discount, Sub Section 7- Application of LDD to Slice, in the third line from
the bottom in paragraph 3, the words "Financial Based (FB) and Safety Net
(SN) should be inserted between (TAC) and CRAC - in order to properly reflect
the intent of the Settlement Proposal. ?Mr. Procter did not respond to this
voice mail message.


Are you asking for a confirmation of receipt from each individual that
receives the message, or something that shows all of the groups that this
message will be sent to?

If you are asking what groups will receive it, I am still waiting for you to
reply to the message I sent earlier today with the existing groups that we
have.  Please confirm whether these groups are acceptable.  Again, the groups
we have are:

 All Enron Houston
 Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary
 Everyone_in_ECT_London
 Everyone_in_ECT_Portland
 Everyone_in_ECT_New York
 Everyone_in_ECT_Denver
 Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo
 Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
 Singapore EI Announcements
 EI-Australia
 Buenos Aires Argentina - Office Staff
 Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff
 Enron Everyone_EOG_Denver
 Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 06/21/2000 01:42 PM
To: Mark Taylor@ENRON
cc: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Messaging
Administration/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Draft - Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption
Applications

The draft of the email you sent Mark looks OK in terms of its content.  Is
there any way I will be able to get some form of a confirmation reflecting
that it was sent to all the offices in my prior emails?


---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 08:44 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Sharen Cason                           12/12/2000 06:56 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: not to be confirmed

There is an hourly trader named Geir Solberg whose trades appear on our
reports to be confirmed.  We go into each trade and change them to not to be
confirmed.   The other hourly deals do not appear on these reports.  I think
perhaps his defaults are not set correctly.  Can you check with him on this.
I don't know why his are appearing on the reports and not other hourly deals.

Thanks!


pls print thanks. dF  Also, pls send to ETS lawyers fyi.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/03/2000
08:50 AM ---------------------------

Julia White
02/02/2000 05:56 PM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Knudsen/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FYI - Top Ten Revenues

I thought you would be interested in 1999 Top Ten customers by revenue for
NNG and TW. Call with any questions.

Thanks. Julia
---------------------- Forwarded by Julia White/ET&S/Enron on 02/02/2000
05:51 PM ---------------------------

Rick Dietz
02/02/2000 05:34 PM
To: Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FYI - Top Ten Revenues

My group is frequently asked to provide the top ten or twenty five customers
(based on revenues) on our pipelines.   Attached are two files that we just
provided to general accounting based on 1999 revenues.  If you recall being
asked these questions, you may want to print off the attached spreadsheets or
save this lotus note to a file for future reference.

Rick


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 05:45 PM -----

	Elizabeth Sager
	02/20/2001 02:21 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: MPLP PPA Dispute

fyi
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 02:20 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	02/18/2001 05:46 PM

		 To: Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: MPLP PPA Dispute

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE

Elizabeth:

I looked through the CMS PPA on my return flight to NY.  While I think we
should walk through the various contractual provisions over the phone, I
nonetheless thought it might be of some help to set forth a few preliminary
focal points for those discussions, particularly if you don't get to this for
a few days.  I thought it made sense to contemporaneously record some
comments as I was thinking through some of the issues/positions.  Also, I'll
have to run down the conflict issue when I get back into the office, but I
thought I could generally review the PPA in any event.

In addition, I did not know whether it was ENA's or Dynegy's obligation to
work on a response to CMS, but I thought it made some sense to see what one
might look like on paper.  (See  attached).  At this point, however, I'm not
sure whether MPLP should furnish any specific contract-based rationale in
writing to CMS as to MPLP's position that the capacity charges should be
adjusted on a calendar year basis.  You will note that the draft letter
focuses on the language dealing with the adjustment formula to the Contract
Capacity Factor (which clearly is done on a calendar year basis), rather than
the scheduled changes to the stated capacity charges set forth on Exhibit D.
As noted below, there are some issues underlying this position.

Preliminary Overall Assessment

The PPA essentially is inconsistent on the capacity charge adjustment issue.
While many of the relevant computations are done on a calendar year
basis--which generally supports MPLP's position--the effect of adjusting the
stated capacity charges on a calendar year basis results in two anomalies:
namely, the stated capacity charge (on Exhibit D) for "Year 1" only would
apply for 3 months, but even more importantly, the capacity charge (on
Exhibit D) for "Year 35" would apply for the last 21 months of the Contract
Term.  The anomaly "running in the other direction" is that, under CMS's
interpretation, various computations would be made on a calendar year basis
(e.g., Contract Capacity Factor), and adjustments resulting therefrom would
be applied "mid-stream" (i.e., after 3 months of the alleged "contract year"
).  My overall concern is that an arbitrator may focus on the anomaly
(described above) that results by applying Exhibit D using a calendar year
concept (i.e., the 21 month "Year 35" issue) since that is a fairly easy
concept to get your arms around..

More Information/Diligence/Research

Before a definitive conclusion on the issue can be made, we likely would want
to review or undertake, as the case may be, some additional
information/diligence/research, such as (which I assume we could generally
obtain from the Michigan regulatory counsel referenced in the e-mail you
forwarded):

--The Michigan PUC presumably approved the PPA (prior to the first amendment)
in a published Order.  Was there anything in that Order or the submissions
(or exhibits thereto, including financial projections) that might provide
some guidance?

--My guess is that there must be other CMS QF PPAs with the same type of
pricing structure since this issue essentially would arise in every instance
where the COD was not a Jan.1.  Do we (or local counsel) know whether this
may be a "global" attack by CMS on these types of PPAs?

--While not directly relevant to the contract interpretation question,
confirm with local counsel that CMS would have recovered the "excess"
capacity payments from its customers--so that it presumably would have to
issue a customer refund if it were to prevail on its claims.

--CMS "self bills" itself under the PPA.  Has the statute of limitations run
on any of its claims for refunds for prior years?  Can CMS's prior course of
dealing be used to support MPLP's contractual interpretation, or is there
otherwise an equitable argument that CMS should not be able to recover prior
"overpayments" (as opposed to prospectively adjusting the capacity
payments)?  (This could be particularly helpful to try to settle out the
dispute on the basis that MPLP would concede the issue on a prospective basis
only).

--The cover letter from CMS suggests that the alleged payment error resulted
in payments in excess of the avoided cost rate authorized by the PUC.  Isn't
this determination to be made over the life of the PPA, rather than for any
particular period?  Assuming CMS's statement is correct, I assume it does not
affect the validity of the PPA, but only whether CMS can recover the "excess"
amount in rates?

--Do we have any leverage in the event we were to raise this dispute with the
PUC?  If so, can this be used in the context of trying to work out an overall
restructuring of the PPA?

Certain Points in Support of MPLP's Position

--The definition of "Contract Capacity Factor" provides for a calendar year
determination and, most importantly, provides for a partial year calculation
for the year in which the COD occurs that ends at the end of that calendar
year.  If the capacity charge should be adjusted as of the anniversary of the
COD date, it arguably would not make sense to have a partial year calculation.

--Sec. 10(a) provides that if in any calendar year the Contract Capacity
Factor is less than 60%, then the capacity charges set forth on Exhibit D
"shall be adjusted for the next calendar year as follows.... The capacity
charges for the following calendar year shall then be determined....
(Emphasis added).  This section makes specific reference to Exhibit D and
makes the adjustment effective for the next calendar year, not on the next
anniversary of the COD.  It arguably would not appear to make any sense to
apply the Contract Capacity Factor adjustment on a calendar basis, but
determine the capacity charges on a COD anniversary basis if no adjustments
thereto are required because the Contract Capacity Factor levels do not
require an adjustment.

 --NOTE:  The counter-argument, however, is that the foregoing language only
pertains to the computation of a percentage "haircut" or adjustment that is
applied to the stated capacity charges on Exhibit D, whatever those may be,
rather than to when the annual stated capacity charges are effective.  That
is, making this adjustment on a calendar year basis, even though the
scheduled capacity rates change each October 1, is not necessarily in
conflict with the rest of the PPA.

--Sec. 2(b) (Effective Date and Term) provides that the Agreement runs for 35
years "and thereafter from year to year," unless a party gives at least one
year's notice to terminate which termination shall be effective "at the end
of the 35 years or any calendar year thereafter." (Emphasis added).  Thus,
for example, if one month after the end of the 35 year term--i.e., October
31, 2030--a party gave notice to terminate, such termination would be
effective December 31, 2031, not September 30, 2031 or September 30, 2032
(i.e., not on the anniversary dates of the COD).  Thus, the PPA contemplates
in certain respects certain "stub" years and certain "long" years, a
contractual scheme that is at least analogous to MPLP's position on the stub
and long years for the timing of the scheduled changes in the stated capacity
charges on Exhibit D.

--There are other calendar year based obligations--for e.g., Sec. 13 (and
Exhibit B) reflect termination payments that, again, are calculated on a
calendar year basis.  (We should discuss with the commercial people the
economic rationale underlying the termination payments to see if there may be
additional support in that respect).  (Note that some other calendar year
based calculations were eliminated by the First Amendment to the PPA, but can
still be used to reflect the underlying "calendar year" flavor of the PPA
since the issue at hand existed even prior to the First Amendment).

A Few Additional Points to Note

--The PPA is devoid of default language, LDs, etc.; however, MPLP could bring
a claim against CMS to arbitration (Sec. 18) for what it believes it is owed
when CMS does not pay the full capacity charges in 2001 (plus interest as
provided at Sec. 20) and keep performing under the PPA.

--Although I do not see a significant issue here, let's briefly discuss the
potential for CMS to try to affirmatively use an "indication" of a regulatory
disallowance pursuant to Sec. 10(c) as a way to attempt to force its
"contract year" interpretation of Exhibit D.  While Sec. 10(c) is one of
those "old school" one way regulatory outs, MPLP would undoubtedly use Sec.
10(e) [requiring CMS to defend the PPA) to prevent CMS's affirmatively use of
the PUC to support its contract claim.  (In Pennsylvania, PECO, in an
analogous circumstance, attempted to use a PUC determination as justification
to attempt to break a PPA with a QF).

Let me know when you wish to follow up.

John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com
 - sager-2.doc


interest?
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron on
05/21/2001 11:23 AM ---------------------------

Kim.A.Noren@dynegy.com on 04/20/2001 03:01:54 PM
To: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Ancillary Services RFP

If you have any questions please contact Ken Cowan- 713-507- 6574

(See attached file: Ancillary Services Request For Proposal.doc)
 - Ancillary Services Request For Proposal.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Williams/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 03:52 PM ---------------------------

Jason Moore
04/17/2001 02:30 PM
To:	Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc:	Jason Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Re: FW: Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Greenwood, South Carolina

Is there a contact for this counterparty?

Jason Moore

From:	Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/12/2001 04:23 PM
To:	Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FW: Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Greenwood, South Caroina

Jason,

	I will submit this request.

Lesli

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R.
Sent:	Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Moore, Jason; Campbell, Lesli
Subject:	Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Greenwood, South Caroina

Jason and Lesli -

Could you please add the following c/p to Global C/P and Credit Agg:

Commissioners of Public Works of The City of Greenwood, South Carolina
Post Office Box 549
Greenwood, South Carolina 29648
Phone (864) 942-8100

Thanks,

Jay

<Embedded StdOleLink>


We would like to begin trading a new product on EOL.  The location - PG&E
Topock -  has already been set up, but we would like to make a small change
to the long description.  The line which reads  -  "The transaction is for
delivery at PG&E, El Paso."  should be changed to "The transaction is for
delivery at PG&E Topock"    Please let me know when we can review the change,
as Mike Grigsby would like to begin trading this product as soon as
possible.  Thanks.


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.

       employment@anadarko.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RSHAPIRO>
To: employment@anadarko.com
Date: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:19:15 GMT
Subject:

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Shapiro, Richard
	Sent: Thu 12/27/2001 9:16 AM
	To: rallison@anadarko.com; jseitz@anadarko.com;
cmanley@anadarko.com
	Cc:
	Subject: Rick Shapiro:resume

	Gentlemen: . While I'm still at Enron( one of the few), I am
diligently developing future opportunities for myself in the wake of the
unfortunate events at Enron. Since I can't help but read great things
about your company, I thought I would send you a short note to determine
if Anadarko  might have any interest in someone with a strong
government/regulatory affairs background. While I'm assessing a few
offers at the moment, they are out of Texas and would require
relocation. My desire is to stay here. I'm good at what I do; my style
at Enron was very different from the reputation of the company( low key,
but effective); and the idea of applying my skills in a new setting is
quite appealing. I know Anadarko  has constant interaction with varrious
facets of government, but I don't fully know how you currently staff
those needs and whether someone with my background could be of
use...Thus my note. Below are various ways to contact me if there is any
interest. Thanks for taking the time to consider this note and Happy
Holidays...Rick Shapiro

				Richard S. Shapiro

				936-321-7153 (hm)
				713-853-3407 (wk)
				281-831-3749 (cell)
				rickshapiro@hotmail.com <
mailto:rickshapiro@hotmail.com>
				richard.shapiro@enron.com

				<<Shapiro resume.doc>>


Hello Maria Teresa,

Eugenio is teaching a class on Black Scholes pricing at 2pm today. Can we meet at 3 pm today or if you can't do it today we can leave it for Monday.

thanks,
Monika


Hey guys,

PSA's are a hot topic, and I have a call into Lisa Bills to discuss it.  Lisa
has been out of town for a few days, as has the GF TurboPark lawyer, Rose
Engeldorf.  Rose is being seconded to ENA for TurboPark issues, and will be
back in the office tomorrow.  We should sit down with Rose and puzzle through
the issue.

As for the "standard" EECC form PSA, it is a real bear.  Carlos has recently
worked on a TurboPark/97-10 compliant form, and is waiting for Global Finance
blessing.  He was going to talk to Bart about his experience, which could
also add some extra insight.

When you guys have some time it is probably worth taking a half hour to
discuss it.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:14
AM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/13/2001 08:04 AM
To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann@ENRON, Barton Clark@ECT,
Randy Pais@Enron

Subject: Re: Request for PSA and TL for EDSA on Deerfield Beach Peaker
Project - Broward County, FL

Right, Renee. We don't want to do sonething that might inadvertently bust any
eventual off-balance sheet treatment that might apply.

Hey, Ann. FYI, our usual form of PSA and Tasking Letter didn't fit these off
balance structures on Mr. Clark's Ft. Pierce job. There was something of a
controversy as a result and they had to be re-worked. We don't want to go
there again.

Kay, Ann, and Steve, do you know if  this project is to be Turbo-Parked and
if so is the work  that you need the PSA and TL hard cost or soft cost? If
it's to be Turbo Parked, let's work from the  forms Bart developed for Ft.
Pierce. Renee, please copy Ann on each draft you turn out, including before
you launch to the other side.

I am out of the office this week,but checking e-mail and voice mail about
once a day.  Please leat a voice mail for me at 713-646-6309 if you need me.

Thanks.

JWVS

	Renee Alfaro
	03/12/2001 12:47 PM

		 To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Request for PSA and TL for EDSA on Deerfield Beach Peaker Project -
Broward County, FL

John,

I have received the following request for a PSA and Tasking Letter between
ENA and EDSA from Steve Rose.  I want to make sure that the Deerfield
Project, part of the Florida Greenfield Projects, is not being done through
Off-Balance Sheet Financing, as this would preclude us from using the PSA
form of contract.  To this end, I am copying Ann Elizabeth White, the ENA
attorney on the Florida Greenfield Projects.

Once it is determined whether a PSA and Tasking Letter is acceptable for the
work, I will proceed accordingly.

If the Florida Greenfields are being financed through Turbo Park, I believe
Bart Clark has a Turbo Park form for the landscape artitecture firm being
used on the Ft. Pierce Project and I could try getting a copy of that from
him.

Thanks
Renee Alfaro
Phone: 713-646-7281
Fax: 713-646-6158
Email: ralfaro@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/12/2001 12:42 PM -----

	Steven Rose
	03/12/2001 12:38 PM

		 To: Renee Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Request for PSA and TL for EDSA on Deerfield Beach Peaker Project -
Broward County, FL

Renee,

I let you a voice mail message about this on Friday.  We have up until now
been using the landscape architecture firm of Curtis-Rogers, working under a
subcontract with Parsons Brinckerhoff, on the Deerfield Beach and South Dade
sites.  Steve Krimsky has decided that he wants to use EDSA (another
landscape architecture firm we've used on Pompano Beach) to complete the
landscaping design work on Deerfield Beach, and to have them work directly
for ENA rather than as a sub to PB.  I've already discussed this at length
with Doug Smith, one of the principals at EDSA, and have e-mailed him a large
quantity of design information and got EDSA kicked off to do the work.  Doug
is supposed to send me a summary of EDSA's NTE costs for the tasks I
identified to him, which I will forward to you as soon as I get it.

EDSA is now working on the Deerfield Beach landscaping on the basis of my
conversation and e-mail, and their preliminary deliverables are due Friday
March 16 (i.e., the end of this week).  We need to get a PSA and TL set up
between ENA and EDSA to formalize this arrangement.  I would like you to
draft these two documents ASAP so that we can get the proper contract
documents in place as quickly as possible.

I will forward to you via separate e-mails the various documentation you will
need to help put this together.

I'm working at home today (typical ENA vacation day!), so you can reach me on
my cell or at home if you want to talk about this.

My numbers are:

Cell:  713-854-4971
Home:  281-655-0185

Thanks in advance for your help with this task.

Regards,

Steve


Attached is a contact sheet for the Agricultural Team as of 7/25.  If I have
missed someone, please include and email me a new version of this excel file.
Blank spaces represent positions soon to be filled with incoming personnel.


I knew that as soon as I left, Reggie was going to get out of control.  I
thought the two of you could take care of him, but I see I was sorely
mistaken.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Genia FitzGerald@ECT
	10/11/00 07:43 AM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HOTDOG !This is sooo adorable!

You are both wrong, it is Reggie's fault, he told me not to hang around
either of you!!!!!

	Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/10/2000 04:21 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: HOTDOG !This is sooo adorable!

Yeh, you're right.  It is her fault.  In the past, she always had plans and
couldn't (or just didn't want to) go with us.  I guess that's the price you
pay for being so popular and in demand.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	10/10/00 04:09 PM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HOTDOG !This is sooo adorable!

It's really all Genia's fault, she goes to lunch too darn early.  I guess we
need to make a date beforehand for lunch with you...!

	Marie Heard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	10/10/2000 04:04 PM

		 To: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: HOTDOG !This is sooo adorable!

Hey, I was an invited guest.  It wasn't my party!  Sounds like someone is
trying to weasel herself out of trouble.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Genia FitzGerald@ECT
	10/10/00 03:23 PM

		 To: Marie Heard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: HOTDOG !This is sooo adorable!

Thanks for inviting me to share Mexican food with you.  Tana said it was YOUR
fault I wasn't invited!!!!!

Genia
----- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 03:21 PM -----

----- Forwarded by Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 02:30 PM -----

 - Hotdog PHOTO2.jpg


Can we have a call tomorrow to discuss status, etc.?  10 AM Houston time work
for folks?

Best,
Jeff


To help accomplish our business goals, the following management appointments
are effective immediately:

Tod Lindholm, previously Managing Director - Chief Accounting Officer for
EBS, will move to Corporate as Managing Director and assume responsibility
for Business Risk Management, IT Compliance as well as working on a number of
special assignments for Rick Causey, Executive Vice President - Chief
Accounting Officer for Enron Corp.

John Echols, currently Managing Director - Risk Systems Development for EBS
will assume responsibility for accounting and administration for EBS  as well
as his current responsibilities and will report to the Office of the Chairman
for EBS.

Everett Plante, currently Vice President - Chief Information Officer for EBS
will now  report directly to the Office of the Chairman for EBS.


David and Louise:
One of the things that Organic has asked us to keep confidential is "the
existence of any business discussions, negotiations or agreements between the
parties as well as any information regarding the skills and compensation of
employees, contractors or other agents of the disclosing party."  This is a
departure from our form.  Are we prepared to agree to this?  Also, to the
extent that parties are insisting on using their form of CA, what do you want
the approval process to be?
Carol


Will Leasa Mellencamp or the bankruptcy committee now be handling EES bankruptcies or just advising on the  process?


Ms. Renken,

Further to our conversation, please see attached draft.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490