Phillips Production has/had two seperate PNG deals:
 1.  500 MCFD; $2.82/MCF; 1/1/00 - 6/30/00
 2.  300 MCFD;  $2.95/MCF;  1/1/00 - 11/30/00
To my knowledge, PNG does not send out production information to either the
producer or the pool operator.  This information should be available on
E-Script.
 Phillips gets their production volumes (which they use to create our
invoice) from the company integrating the meter charts.  I beleive that this
is the same information provide to PNG.
John

	From:  Victor Lamadrid @ ECT                           08/29/2000 05:47 PM

To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeanne
Wukasch/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

Wade,  Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. But I need help
understanding this one.  We have a process already to handle John's behind
the citygate deals

Since, the actual scheduling is done by CES in Virginia,  we never nominate
this gas nor do we see actuals.  We hear about them from John and Terry and
we are supposed to get confirms from the producer and CES.  Whenever one of
these deals occurs, we have buys from the producer and sales to CES to
account for these transactions internally.

It's my understanding that whenever John cuts one of these behind the
citygate deals;  that Terry puts it into Sitara for him.  The offset also
entered by Terry  is a sale to CES (Now the New Power Company effective Sept.
1) with commercial (usually Chris Germany) confirming the sale price.  Angie
schedules it in Unify under CNG and we create, track and balance like usual.

Is that not the case here?  Is this something that's getting reconciled in
Jeanne and Terry's project for CNG???

By cc: Angie, please get with Terry /Jeanne and Chris to help Wade.  THANKS!
Please keep me abreast of the status.

Wade R Price
08/29/2000 02:53 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gloria G
Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Phillips Production Co - PNG City Gate Production

ENA is being invoiced by Phillips Production Company for production on
Dominion Transmission (CNG) via Peoples Natural Gas.  This is
behind-city-gate gas that we do not get documents supporting the volumes. I
have invoices and production statements from Phillips.

Per John Singer Notes Mail of 08/23 concerning the July production," Phillips
Production / Peoples: Price:  @ $2.95/Mcf  Term:  1/1/2000 - 11/30/2000 Est.
Volume:  500/MCFD  (Actual Volume will vary.)   I have no way of verifying
the actual volume.  Chris Germany and Angie Zeman will try to get into CES's
PNG pool via E-Script.  This may be the only way to verify actual volumes.  I
have a call into Phillips to see if they might have a pipeline statement
verifying volumes."  Joihn's call to Phillips read partially,  " I just
talked to Sam Fragale @ Phillips.  The 7,843 Mcf @ $2.95 is ENA's. "

Our deals have been using point 20200 on Dominion Transmission (CNG).  Deals
for Jan 00 - Mar 00 were 210359 and 210364.  These were copied to 226543 and
229733 respectively for April 00 forward  Deal 226543 has April 00 only, but
should probably be extended through June-00 according to deal notes from John.
Here is our current status on this gas

Prod  Invoice  Invoice  Current
Month  Volume  Price  Unify Vol Sitara Deal

May-00  4801  @$2.82  163  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9748  @$2.95  353  229733

June-00  5341  @$2.82  0  226543 (has April-00 only, should extend through
June?))
  9394  @$2.95  0  229733

July-00  7843  @$2.95  9552  229733

We need to get our proccess together for handling this each month through the
end of the deal terms.

Please direct the appropriate parties to help make these invoiced volumes
available on the deal and in Unify so I can pay Phillips.

Thanks  WRP


Kate -

  I'm in June 2001 trading sheet (not read only).  Please let me know if you need me to get out of it.

  Thanks,

  VIrginia


Good Morning,

Due to our current situation, I have 3 full time very talented schedulers with very little to do.  They have a wide range of experience and abilities, and would be available to assist you in whatever tasks may need handling.

Please let me know if you have temporary room for any one or all 3 of these folks, I would like them to have something to do while we are waiting for trading to resume.

Thanks,

Cara


Rahil,

Sally asked that I prepare the attached power point slide to replace the current Overview of Operations Desk slide.  Sally has not reviewed it so there might be changes.  I am sending it to both of you in the essence of time.


FYI

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 03:24 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	11/20/2000 03:20 PM

		 To: Nanette Crist <NCrist@prebon.com>@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confidential information

Nanette:

Attached please find a clean and red-lined version of the NDA.  Let me know
if it's acceptable and I will have it executed and sent to you.

Leslie


Here's the info guys.  Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Angela
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:35 AM
To:	Bolton, Stacey
Cc:	Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	Conference call

Hey Stac.  The dial in number for your conf. call is 800.998.2462.  PIN is 5478626.  Don't forget to press the pound key after entering the PIN number.

We have rectified the problem and I am the process of getting us credited for the calls you were not able to log on to.  If anything else is needed, please let me know.


Staci,  Attached is the CSA with my comments redlined.  Please review and
let's discuss.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
08:31 AM ---------------------------

	From:  William S Bradford                           11/21/2000 08:09 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation

Dave,

I am sending this in response to your query regarding the slow payment from
Wheeling Pittsburgh.  Wheeling Pittsburgh has allegedly filed bankruptcy some
time last week.  Legal is trying to obtain the bankruptcy filing we are
beginning to solidfy our potential claim.   Our current exposure is
approximately $1.55mm ($1.07mm in receivable and $375k MTM).  We are working
with the steel team (the deal was orginated by Tammy Mulrooney) and legal to
determine our rights under our contract.  We will keep you posted with any
updates.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Bill


There does not appear to be anything that would prevent us from trading
weather derivatives under this master.  There is a weather represenation that
should be added to the confirmations but other than that there are no other
modifications that I know of.  (Tana please let me know if I am wrong.)  Just
as an aside I noted in the database that it appears that a little over a year
an a half ago the cp wanted to do all physical and finanacial trading through
Hess Energy Services Company LLC.  Did anything come of this?  I do not
believe a master was signed for this entity.  I just want to confirm that
Hess Energy Trading Company LLC is the active trading entity.

Thanks,
Brent

	Tanya Rohauer@ECT
	08/04/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hess Energy Trading Co LLC

Brent,  we have an ISDA with this company (executed early 1998).  Does it
need any modifications in order to trade weather derivatives under it?  I'm
not sure if the standard ISDA works or if it  needs an amendment for special
weather definitions.  I am assuming you are handling weather based on your
handling the new weather/insurance/transformer stuff...if not, please pass
along to whomever is handling.  Thanks so much for your help.

Tanya


Please retype and send the memo directly within e-mail.  Thanks,  Mark

	Deb Korkmas
	10/02/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ENA Legal Budget

Mark,
Please see attached memo regarding ENA 2000 Legal Budget.  Also, I hope to
have the Legal Expenditures memo completed by tomorrow.  Kris Armstrong is
updating the ENA Team List that appears as a Schedule to the memo.  Deb

Deb Korkmas
Enron North America Corp.
ENA Legal Dept.
1400 Smith Street, Room 3819
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713-853-5448
Fax:  713-646-3393


Actually this is better

 - BallotWPBF11[1].11.00.doc

Louise Kitchen
11/13/2000 05:06 PM
To: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@ENRON
cc: Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Darren
Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcello Romano/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Haakon Olafsson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ENRON, Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Phillip -SYDNEY-
Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Takashi
Kimura/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

 - Floridaballo1.jpg

Jonathan Whitehead @ ENRON   11/13/2000 04:34 PM

To: Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Anthony
Dayao/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Darren
Delage/AP/Enron@Enron, Marcello Romano/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Haakon Olafsson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew Fairley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Rousseau Anai/AP/Enron@Enron, Phillip -SYDNEY-
Taylor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Takashi Kimura/AP/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

----- Forwarded by Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron on 11/14/2000 07:31 AM -----

	Whitehead@aronsonpartners.com
	11/14/2000 12:44 AM

		 To: Atkins@aronsonpartners.com, Fitzgerald@aronsonpartners.com,
Dixon@aronsonpartners.com, Rogers@aronsonpartners.com, nwhitehe@yahoo.com,
Austin.Summerford@mba02.bus.utexas.edu, ghbarr2@pop.uky.edu,
Mark_Adelman@snowe.senate.gov, James_Gordon@hillspet.com, charring@fbr.com,
jonathan.whitehead@enron.com, edorros@nyc.rr.com, CDavis@mainspring.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Proposed Replacement Ballot for Florida Voters

this is a good one.

 - ballot.gif


Our Commercial group has definitely used the Deal Analysis system!  The
reports have been very beneficial in quantifying some of our recent
transporting deals on Transwestern.  For example, we executed a one year deal
for 20000/day at our maximum tariff rate, which will generate $4 million
gross margin.  Another one year deal for 8000/day, also to the California
border, will give us over $1 million gross margin.  Two other examples for 11
months each will generate an additional combined $1.5 million.  Hopefully
this will justify our need for this system.  Let me know if you need anything
else.

Kim Kouri
10/27/2000 08:19 AM
To: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: TW Deal Profitability/Analysis

Michelle, I am trying to get some quantification of actual benefits (in terms
of $'s saved or loss avoided) of your use of the model.  Could you give me
some feedback before Tuesday, as Phil Lowry is asking about use and actual
benefits of this model.

Thanks

Kim


John Arnold,
Thanks for ordering from Wine Exchange!
Your order has been accepted and confirmed as indicated.  We will ship (unless you specified otherwise when ordering) soon.
You will only receive another email if we encounter unforeseen problems with your order.
Buyer...
Name          : John Arnold
Email         : john.arnold@enron.com
Phone         : 713-557-3330
Address       : 2000 Bagby
                #15403
                Houston, Texas 77002


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
03/29/2001 03:20 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: new mid in sitara

FYI   Most of the deals are at NBPL/Peoples
---------------------- Forwarded by Russ Severson/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 03:20
PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
03/29/2001 03:16 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: new mid in sitara

If these are new curves today, they will not show up in CPR until 6:30 am
tomorrow.
This is the list of deals at the 2 locations.

Phillip M Love
03/29/2001 02:33 PM
To: Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: new mid in sitara

Can you set up a mid for all deals at a location of NBPL/Peoples and
PGLC/NBPL.  The intramonth curve Chi./N/Border and the gas daily curve is
GDC-Chi./N/Bord.  Can you tell me how many deals are currently in the system
for these two locations.  Sorry to rush you, but I need these in for calcing
tonight.  Thanks.
PL
3-7376


PLEASE NOTE SPECIAL HOURS

Notice No. 01-349
October 23, 2001

TO:       All NYMEX Members/Member Firms
          All NYMEX Clearing Members
          All NYMEX Floor Traders
          All NYMEX Operations Managers

FROM:     George Henderson, Vice President

RE:       CORRECTED: Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the
Trading             Floor and Clearing Members - Revised Hours
________________________________________________________________

The expiration date for the November 2001 options contract for Unleaded
Gasoline (GOX1), Heating Oil (OHX1) and Natural Gas (ONX1) is Friday,
October 26, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized
representative present at their normal work station promptly at 4:40 p.m.
until released by the Exchange staff as specified below.  All adjustments
and/or corrections, must be accompanied by relevant supporting
documentation
prior to being incorporated into expiration processing, in essence making
the expiration processing an extension of the afternoon trade resolution
procedures.  All input to the NYMEX Clearing Department will conclude no
later than 30 minutes after floor representatives are released.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110), Floor Trade Processing (299-2068 and
299-2169)
personnel, as well as a representative of the Floor Committee will be
available to assist with the processing of notices of Exercise and
Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other questions or
problems you may have.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The Option Expiration process is a screen based process for which all
information is provided on the screens on C21 terminals. No Option
Expiration Reports will be provided. The following screens will assist you
through the Option Expiration process:

MEMBER TRADE INQUIRY
Contains real-time top day trade information, trade information for the
previous 4 business days and trade=s adjusted for the previous 4 business
days by adjustment date.

SINGLE POSITION MAINTENANCE
Contains a real-time snapshot for each option series from the start of day
position to the projected end of day position.

REVIEW ACCEPT REJECT TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfers TO your firm and the status of
each transfer.

REVIEW SUBMITTED TRANSFERS
Contains all trade and position transfer FROM your firm and the status of
each transfer.

EXERCISE NOTICE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to exercise.

DO NOT EXERCISE SUBMISSION
Contains your available long position and an input field to enter the
number
of long positions you wish to abandon.

POSITION CHANGE SUBMISSION
PCS may be submitted either by manual input or by electronic transmission.
Any PCS input on a Clearing 21 terminal will be the input processed by the
system.  This input may be made at any time prior to 5:55 p.m.  Any PCS
input via transmission for that contract series will be disregarded.

ALL POSITIONS ARE DEEMED FINAL
Upon completion of all PCS input, all positions will be deemed final.

EXERCISE/ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Will be available to you on the Single Position Maintenance window by
contract series or the Assignment List window which contains all your
Assignments on one window. You will be notified of its availability by C21
E-Mail and by Fast Facts. This should occur within 1 hour of the last PCS
input.

All Clearing Members are required to have an authorized representative(s)
at
their C21 workstations in preparation for any communication during the
expiration process.

FAST FACTS
Clearing Members should call the Fast Facts information service 301-4871,
access code 700 for event messages advising Members of the event status.

E-MAIL
Clearing Members should read their C21 E-Mail messages immediately to be
aware of event status.

The standard event Fast Facts and/or E-Mail messages and the sequence in
which they will be announced are:

STANDARD EVENT           APPROXIMATE TIME            USUAL   FAST
FACTS(F)
  MESSAGES                       OF MESSAGE        EVENT TIME
E-MAIL    (E)
                           AVAILABILITY
BOTH      (B)

Announce Out-of-the                 4:45PM          4:45PM        F
Money Exercise and In-the-Money
Do Not Exercise Submissions

Announce Final Input to C21         5:40PM          5:55PM        E
Cutoff Time

All positions are deemed final      7:00PM          7:00PM        F

Announce Exercise/Assignment        7:30PM          7:30PM        B
Information Available on the Single
Position Maintenance Windows

All Report Distribution is         10:00PM         10:00PM        F
completed

The times appearing in the Usual Event Time column are based on normal
operational conditions and could vary.

If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact
Anthony Di Benedetto at 299-2152 or John Ramos at 299-2142 prior to the
expiration date.

 <<EXPFORMSPEC.XLS>>

(See attached file: EXPFORMSPEC.XLS)

 - EXPFORMSPEC.XLS


As we discussed yesterday, the TCPL Mainline Service and Pricing Settlement language
on the proposed Capacity Turnback Policy may be very important feature of the Settlement
if ENA ends up reducing its sale to the plant and is responsible for mitigating the cost of Sithe's
transportation upstream of Chippawa.  The other features such as FT Make-Up Credits and AOS
Credits on Sithe's transport will create new opportunities to generate incremental revenues for
ENA and Sithe.  The IT Floor Price  will directly impact the "death spiral" of future capacity
decontracting and resulting increased demand charges for Sithe if the IT Floor is placed below
100% of firm tolls.

Here are some additional comments and questions on the draft language on TCPL's
Turnback Policy:

1)	Policy is good only through December 31, 2002, the ending date of the Settlement.
	There are a couple pipeline expansions (i.e. Iroquois' Eastchester and a rumored
	alternative to the Canadian portion of Millenium) that have a Fall 2003 in-service
	date.  Will TCPL's "queue" for new capacity kick-off the Turnback Policy?  Is there
	a requirement that TCPL's upstream capacity match up with takeaway capacity in
	the U.S., for example Iroquois's 230,000 dth/d Eastchester project.  Sithe's capacity
	may only partially prevent an additional expansion from Dawn to Waddington.
	Sithe's capacity, however, would have higher value if the rumored Dawn to Niagara
	expansion alternative to Millenium becomes a reality.  Can the language be clarified
	so that we don't lose out on turning back Sithe's capacity if an expansion project
	does not quite hit the deadline of December 31, 2002?

2)	Requests for Turnback to be only posted on TCPL's bulletin board.  Can TCPL be
	required to make a written notification to all FT shippers?  What will be the minimum
	amount of time that shipper will have to prepare turnback bids?  Several weeks to
	a month is typical for U.S. pipelines and can occur simultaneously during the Open
	Season for the expansions.

3)	Existing FT shippers along the path on the Mainline System being expanded may
	offer to turnback all, or a portion of, their FT contracts.  What criteria and who
	determines the path to be expanded?  If a downstream expansion project is for
	10 years, what if TCPL only needs to expand for the first couple of years and then
	there is more turnback?  It just seems that there is so much TCPL discretion on the
	bid and evaluation process?  Could some guidelines or goals established ahead
	of time, in addition to the highest NPV process, that would direct how some of these
	decisions are made?

4)	FT Shippers can turnback capacity on a permanent or temporary basis.  Is this
	the approach that TCPL is proposing to handle that capacity is only needed for
	say 10 years to match up with Iroquois' Eastchester project?  In the U.S. shippers
	have ROFR rights to extend their contract after the initial term.  Is turnback capacity
	and the evaluation process that TCPL is proposing considering extending contracts
	beyond the primary term?

5)	Turnback premiums and turnback discounts.  I believe the goal should be that
	Shipper's such as Sithe, who have the longest contract term on TCPL's shipper
	list, are protected from any increased rate base that will lead to higher prices in
	the future if the entire pipeline is not fully contracted.  This is an optimization step
	that needs to be included during the bid evaluations.  I am not clear whether
	the proposed NPV approach and the Policy Item #7 fully protects long-term
	shippers?

6)	During the NPV evaluation, are 100% tolls used or just the reservation charges?

7)	The valuation of the NPV cost of new Facilities and/or "Transportation by Others"
	capacity to meet new service reuirements.  Sithe's St. Clair to Chippawa transport
	is already a "TBO" capacity contract from Dawn to Chippawa.  Could the wording
	be changed in the evaluation formula so that TCPL considers the net cost impact
	to the TCPL. on the net facility impact, rather than just any new savings in "TBO"
	capacity costs?

8)	All turnback costs and revenues will be recorded in a Flow-Through Deferral
	Account.   Will remaining firm shippers see all the benefit or the cost from how
	this account will be applied in the next subsequent Test Year?

If you have any questions, please call me at x31667,

Ruth


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 02:01
PM ---------------------------
Anne Labbe @ ENRON   02/16/2001 01:27 PM

To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Holiday Pay

Just an FYI that your shift workers will receive their holiday pay for
1/15/01 on their next paycheck.  If you have any questions or problems,
please don't hesitate to let me know.


Heather / Jeff:

Thanks for a copy of the draft PPA. I've addressed this to both of you as
some of my questions are based on the interaction of the PPA vs. development
timeline and risk. Here are my thoughts / comments:

1. The PPA is really a free option through Nov. 30th, at which time we can
choose to exercise our position and proceed. How does this fit with our
expectations regarding PUC approval of our CPCN (which seems to be our
highest risk development item)? Have we gone back and submitted a
modification to our CPCN for the 2- LM6000, and 1- SW501D5A config?

2. Do we need to define the Facility as "dual" fuel? It will not initially be
dual fuelled as we intend to field engineer the dual fuel capability.

3. Section 3.1 (c). This provision should acknowledge our right to sell base
Contract Capacity (as opposed to excess) to any Person to the extent that
VEPCO has not exercised their option to purchase such Contract Capacity. In
other words, this section should be consistent with sales allowances to other
Persons in Section 3.4 (b) (although that section only references energy
sales).

4. Section 3.4. Can we sell both day ahead energy and capacity to any Person
to the extent VEPCO does not exercise their call by providing us the notice
contemplated in Section 3.4 (b) (the section only references an allowance for
energy sales)?

5. Section 3.4(c) Do the "additional costs" which this section requires Buyer
to pay (to the extent Buyer provides an intra-day notice) include
"lost-profit" costs arising from sales of energy and capacity by Seller to
other Persons as permitted in Section 3.4 (b)? If so, I would suggest that
this section make a specific reference, such as "including any and all of
Seller's lost-profit and transaction costs associated with energy and
capacity sales to other Persons".

6. Do we have a project LLC formed which can serve as the entity signing the
PPA? Do we think VEPCO will ask for any corp. or ENA guarantees to the extent
we use an LLC?

 7. Have we worked with the accountants to make sure we can use MTM
accounting given the terms of this PPA?

Jeff: Please provide a brief development summary to the group outlining (in
order of highest risk to lowest) the various significant development items
we'll need to deal with for this site (i.e. zoning, groundwater supply vs.
municipal water supply, etc.). It would be helpful if you would use the
project development control matrix.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Ben


__________________________________
NEW FEATURES
from The Wall Street Journal

Dear Subscriber:

I am pleased to invite you to a sneak preview of our redesigned and
enhanced edition of The Wall Street Journal Online, with superior site
organization, easier-to-use features and better performance for faster
results. You can get an early look at:
http://wsj.com/tour

Rest assured, all the up-to-the-minute, exclusive Journal news and
information you rely on remains center stage. We're simply unveiling
the next-generation Online Journal, which offers NEW FEATURES FROM US -
and DRAMATIC NEW BENEFITS FOR YOU.

You'll find this state-of-the-art site includes many of the enhancements
you've been asking for, including your own PERSONALIZED HOME PAGE that
gives you control of the information that matters most to you while
still providing a concise picture of the top news from the Journal
newsroom. You'll also find an incredibly effective site organization
that makes finding what you want not just easy but effortless.

Specifically, the new Online Journal includes:

==New Organization==
We've reorganized the site to better meet your needs, with all-new main
sections and additions such as News by Industry. You'll also find more
related links on article pages, improved site navigation and pages that
surface more information yet require less scrolling.

==More Personalization==
Here's where the new Online Journal really shines. Create your own
customized home page, with one-click access to the topics you're
interested in. Put your favorite portfolio, company news, industries,
market data and more right on your home page so you'll always have a
completely up-to-date view of the information that matters most to you.
To be ready for the change please be sure and update your current
Personal Journal listings today.

==Better Searching==
We've added our search options to every page, making it simple for you
to expand your knowledge and tap into our improved search results. We've
also revamped our Quotes & Research area, giving you access to detailed
financial information on more than 30,000 companies and funds.

==More Convenience==
You'll be able to conduct tasks such as e-mailing, saving and printing
properly formatted articles on demand.

This new edition of the Online Journal is the result of months of
in-depth interviews with our subscribers and exhaustive research and
testing, as well as comments from subscribers over the past six years.
I believe you'll find the Online Journal truly comes of age with the
introduction of these new benefits. I hope you'll take a moment to
preview the site even before it rolls out in late January. Our advance
tour is available at:
http://wsj.com/tour

Sincerely,

Neil F. Budde
Publisher, The Wall Street Journal Online
nbudde@wsj.com

__________________________________
ABOUT THIS E-MAIL

When you registered with The Wall Street Journal Online, you indicated you
wished to receive this New Features Alert e-mail. From time to time, we will
also send you e-mail announcements on new features and special offers from
other Dow Jones products and services.

IF YOU ARE A CURRENT SUBSCRIBER, you can remove yourself from this list by
visiting this URL:
http://interactive.wsj.com/user-cgi-bin/searchUser.pl?action=emailalert

Uncheck the appropriate box at the bottom of the page to unsubscribe from
this list. Click on the "save selections" button.

For further questions, please call our customer service department at
1-800-369-2834 or 1-609-514-0870 between 7 a.m. and midnight ET Monday-Friday or
e-mail feedback@interactive.wsj.com.

IF YOU ARE NOT A CURRENT SUBSCRIBER, you can remove yourself by e-mailing
feedback@interactive.wsj.com or calling our customer service department at
1-800-369-2834 or 1-609-514-0870 between 7 a.m. and midnight ET Monday-Friday.

Please read our Privacy Policy at:
http://interactive.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/privacy.html
__________________________________
Copyright 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


FYI.... exhibit C for the P.O.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
08:38 AM ---------------------------

"Leo, Tony" <tleo@fce.com> on 11/10/2000 06:11:11 PM
To: "'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'" <Stephen.Plauche@enron.com>, "Bentley,
Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>, "Nock, Herb" <HNock@FCE.com>, "Leitman, Jerry"
<jleitman@fce.com>, "Levine, Ross" <rlevine@fce.com>, "'Jacqueline Scheib'"
<jscheib@rc.com>
cc: "'Michael.D.Nanny@enron.com'" <Michael.D.Nanny@enron.com>,
"'Terri.Austin@enron.com'" <Terri.Austin@enron.com>

Subject: Exhibit C

Exhibit C of the contract, Fixed Specifications is attached, along with the
figure attachment.  Let me know if anyone wants to retitle the figure or
rework any of the language.

Tony
 <<Exhibit C.doc>>  <<Attachment to Exhibit C.tif>>

 - Exhibit C.doc
 - Attachment to Exhibit C.tif


I will as soon as I determine vacation plans.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Kaye Ellis
	04/16/2001 09:40 AM

		 To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Does Anyone Need Airline Reservations for the Law Conference?


Attached is the initial draft of the partnership agreement for Enron Net
Works Partners, L.P.  In light of the accelerated schedule to close the Net
Works equity fund, please forward your comments to me at your earliest
convenience.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Lynnette
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Frank, Robert
Cc:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	CA articles
Importance:	High

713-853-9287
888-703-0309


Vladi:

You have to come back!  Your P&L misses you.

Alejandra


thanks for the information - you know us traders always looking for more info.


Mark,

What differences are you expecting between the Master and a GTC? Can we not
use the Master as the basis for a GTC?

Dave

Mark Taylor
03/29/2000 01:16 AM
To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New Product Startup: Bandwidth

I believe that this is not the GTC but rather the master agreement used for
bandwidth.  I spoke with Cynthia Harkness, one of the bandwidth lawyers, last
week.  My impression was that the bandwidth trading documentation was still
in flux and they were waiting for it to settle down before preparing a GTC.

David Forster
03/27/2000 04:26 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Leonardo Pacheco/HOU/EES@EES, Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: New Product Startup: Bandwidth

Mark,

Attached is a copy of the OTC GTC which the Bandwidth group wishes to use for
Bandwidth trading on EnronOnline, launching May 1.

Could you please let me know which of your guys will be looking after
reviewing/amending this for EnronOnline?

Thanks,

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 03/27/2000 11:22
PM ---------------------------
Jay Hawthorn @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS   03/23/2000 07:25 PM

To: David Forster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jean Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Marcello
Romano/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: New Product Startup: Bandwidth

David,

Here's a first cut of the data to get us started.  Please have a look, and
let me know what other blanks we will need to fill in as we go.  I've also
looked at the additional considerations, and we should sit down and discuss
some of these things with Jean sometime soon.

Please review the attached documents, and I'll continue to refine them along
the way.  Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for your help,
Jay


I am forwarding the agenda for ISDA's Annual General Meeting at the Omni
Shoreham Hotel April 3-6. Highlights include:

* Keynote Addresses by Senator Richard Lugar, William McDonough and
Peter Hancock and Jeffrey Skilling
* Global derivatives public policy panel re: current and future
regulatory developments in Europe and the United States.
* Plenary sessions covering Latin America and Asia, which will have a
regulatory and policy focus.
* Developing Products Panel  (weather, energy, electricity and
bandwidth)
* Equity Derivatives Panel w/discussion on accounting treatment and
U.S. commodity law changes
* Derivatives E-Trading and E-Business influence on derivatives
discussions

This year's AGM offers a variety of exciting social events. ISDA is inviting
key Members of Congress and regulatory staff to all of the following evening
events.

  Tuesday, April 3, 2001, from 7:30-10:30 p.m., Bank of
America, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter will host a welcoming reception at the Corcoran
Gallery of Art, 500 17th St., NW.  Noted jazz musician, Glen Pearson will
provide the evening's entertainment of jazz, blues and swing music.

  Wednesday, April 4, 2001 from 7:30-10:00 p.m., Bank of
America, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter will host a cocktail reception and buffet dinner
in the Great Hall at the Library of Congress, 10 1st St., SE.  The
"Strolling Strings" will provide an "around the world" music review.

  Thursday, April 5, 2001, from 7:00-10:30 p.m., Blackbird
will host a cocktail reception and buffet dinner at the Smithsonian National
Air and Space Museum, Independence Avenue at 6th St., SW.  The Midnight
Movers will provide an exciting concert of R&B, Soul and Motown music.

Hope you will be able to attend.  You can register online through the ISDA
website:  www.isda.org.  Thanks!

 <<Agenda 3-22.doc>>

Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - Agenda 3-22.doc


Susan and Sharon,

Attached for your review is the latest draft of the Master Agreement between
SITA and ECTRIC, as well as a blackline against the previous version.

Stephanie Panus


Here is Dave's OBA calculation exhibit.  Please call to discuss at your
convenience.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 09/14/2000
02:14 PM ---------------------------

Dave Neubauer
09/14/2000 01:48 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


I think I hate football too.  4th and goal on the 3 yard line, to win the
game, and RC decides to change his lifelong coaching strategy from run, run,
run, to pass the ball.  Why not Ja'mar??  The guy who carried 3 defenders
into the end zone earlier.  Anyway, we beat the spread and I got $20 from
your friend Mary.  So things are not all bad.

How did the Corn boys lose?  If I would have known about it on Saturday, I
would have called to console you and the family.  Maybe it's time to just
turn our attention to the NBA and leave this heartache behind.

D

"buylow" <buylow@houston.rr.com> on 11/12/2000 01:54:00 AM
To: "Daren Farmer" <daren.j.farmer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Football

Ugh -- I hate football. It looks like I will have to do  something different
on New Years Day.
?
What happened to you guys? You had them by the  clankers.
?
Later,
Ken


Hey Tim -

Thanks for the note - I needed a smile today.  I've been extremely busy and
am leaving this afternoon for another trip to our London office.  Were you
able to make any headway with the Bank regarding the NY house?  I just
wondered if Greg had been able to help at all.

Mark


Sheila,

I am forwarding you a message I received a few days ago. I want to ask you
for advice how to handle this case.

My first  reaction was to ignore it. The longer I think about it, the more
convinced I become that some action
is required.

Let's try to reverse the situation and assume for the sake of argument that a
female employee
was harassed by a male colleague. An employee informs her boss a few months
later about
the alleged incident and the boss chooses to ignore it. In many similar
cases, courts  subsequently
found against the companies that decided to turn a blind eye to such
complaints.

The fact that we are dealing with the case of reverse harassment is
immaterial.
If I ignore this complaint I may expose the company to charges of double
standard in
handling sexual harassment cases.

My recommendation would be to ask Maureen to attend sensitivity training and
sexual harassment prevention class.

Please, let me know what you think. Sorry to burden you with this case.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000
11:01 AM ---------------------------

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	12/21/2000 03:51 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: f/up

Vince-

I got your message (I was up on the roof of the building helping to fix the
weather satellite dish- what a gorgeous view of Houston!).

I appreciate your words. Everything remains fine, Vince. You are my "father"
here at Enron, and I admire and respect you greatly. I think I know the kind
of person you are, in terms of your integrity, and I admire the high
standards you set for all of us in your extended "Group."

I want to let you know I am not the only one in the group who doesn't
appreciate the way Maureen disrespects you. You remain the key external
factor in their success- it is not simply their own abilities that matter to
their futures but your own- Vince's- success with upper management that
matters.

We respect you, and we don't like it when you are disrespected. Maureen
didn't disrespect me today, Vince, she disrespected you.

It's time I told you something. Last April, Maureen, highly intoxicated
following a work-related function at Ninfa's, made an unsolicited predatory
sexual advance on me at my desk on the 19th floor. I was shocked and
disgusted, but I didn't say one word about this, Vince, because I played it
out and didn't want to put you into the position of having a raving Maureen
in your midst as you perhaps had to fire her and then endure a litany of
gender-bias crap lawsuits.

I "took one for the team," Vince. I can'rt say I would do it again- Maureen
is brazen to berate me after what she did, in public no less.

I appreciate your bringing me into Enron. I've found a respectful and,
indeed, a loving work environment. I remain willing to do whatever I can to
help the Group.

Clayton


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 03/24/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

Royal_B_Edmondson@reliantenergy.com on 03/24/2000 10:48:30 AM
To: ami_Chokshi@enron.com, ggrant@enron.com
cc:

Subject: nom change for champions

(See attached file: egmnom-Mar.xls)
 - egmnom-Mar.xls


Mark F,

Please see the attached work request.  With owner reporting upcoming, you
will have more time for this request.  One issue I saw was estimating the
lost production during the fault events, but I'll let you discuss this with
Tom if it will be an issue.  Maybe the new field in the Faults table might
help?  If so, let me know and I'll push for this do get done.

JD
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 05/29/2002 05:22
PM ---------------------------

	Tom Nemila
	05/29/2002 05:01 PM

To: Information.Services@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Request

To Whom It May Concern:

Please contact me regarding the attached request to discuss schedule. Thanks.

-Tom-


As I mentioned in my voice mail, please check up on the signing bonus we
agreed to pay Tony Pryor.  He didn't get it and we need to get that fixed
asap.  I'll be at 37555 tomorrow and back in Omaha Monday.  If you learn
something tomorrow and can't get ahold of me, please leave me a voice mail.
Thanks.  DF


Thanks.  I have forwarded it to our counsel and will revert with their
comments, if any.

Regards
Erol Benjenk

Director - Business Development
GSX - The Global Steel Exchange
140 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Tel: 212 541 6333 (x14)
Fax: 212 541 6218
E-mail: ebenjenk@gsx.com
www.gsx.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:59 AM
To: ebenjenk@gsx.com
Cc: Bob.Shults@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com;
Cuthbert.Roberts@enron.com
Subject: Global Steel Exchange

At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching Enron's proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval,
please execute the agreement and return it to the attention of Tana
Jones
via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will then have it executed by Enron.  If
you
have any comments or questions please call me at the number indicated
below.  We look forward to hearing from you.

(See attached file: gsx.doc)

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040904.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:  60.43 / Final:  59.43)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  SC_ID: EPMI