1.  Friday, August 17, and Saturday, August 18 we are 25 MW SHORT at PGE's System for HE 15 thru HE 20.  Note:  This is not the same as being short at the Mid-C.  Purchases to fill this short should be put in the short-term Northwest book.  Buy from whomever and notify PGE Real-Time Merchant of the supply.

2.  Friday, August 17, and Saturday, August 18 we are 45 MW short for HE 1-6 and HE 23-24, and 27 MW short for HE 7-22 to Portland General at the MID-C.  Supplier should be at the Mid-C.  Purchases to fill this short should be put in the short-term Northwest book.  Buy from whomever and notify PGE Real-Time Merchant of the supply.

3.  For Friday, August 17 we have 100 MW for HE 07-23 delivered to Portland General at their system (Puget->BPA->PGE).  This is supply for a schedule we will have going to NCPA at COB (PGE->Enron->PGE Trans->NCPA).  The tags have been built already (30070 for Friday and 30071 for Saturday) and are pending.  You will have to implement them at the appropriate time.  You do not need to notify Puget or BPA.  Just coordinate the schedule between PGE and NCPA.

4.   For Friday, August 18 we have 100 MW for HE 07-22.  Same set up as in (3), only 7-22 instead of 7-23.


EcoElectrica Power Plant - Marc Phillips will be participating in the EPA
conference on August 1 in San Juan PR.  Marc has also compiled the Quarterly
Excess emissions Report that will be submitted to EPA today.

EPA Proposed Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs ) - Russ Tucker has
advised the managers and directors of Safety regarding the additional 14
chemicals proposed by EPA for inclusion on the AEGL list and has requested
information from them regarding current usage of these chemicals.

US Inter America Development Bank Meeting - Henry Van participated with EES
Bruce Stram in an  energy outsourcing presentation to the IAD bank and other
energy agency management in Washington.  Henry presented the environmental
outlook in South America and Enron's environmental program and strategy.

 Cuiaba Pipeline Brazil HSE Audit - Greg Marino led the combined Enron/Shell
safety and environmental inspection of the "ridges" section of construction
in Carceres Brazil.  Greg conducted a meeting with Enron , Shell, Gas Oriente
and Cunduto (construction contractor) regarding the nee to develop and
implement an emergency evacuation plan for seriously injured personnel for
the "ridges".

Tennessee proposed air SIP changes - Gus Eghneim and Mary Schoen met with the
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation to raise serious
concerns over the latest draft Tennessee SIP , which cuts Enrons allocation
for NOx allowances 75% from an earlier draft. This would require a major
capital expenditure for the plants at Brownsville and Gleason to maintain
compliance.

 Pipeline Safety Legislation-Jeff Keeler brought GPG's VP Pipeline Safety,
Dave Johnson, to DC to participate in negotiations in the House and Senate.
Industry has finalized and presented  alternative language that can improve
the McCain legislation and hopes that this can break the impasse preventing
the bill from moving to the Senate floor. they are working in the House to
get a bi-partisan bill that would be much less onerous than the McCain bill.

 MTBE Legislation -  we dodged a bullet this week when the Senate Environment
Committee canceled a markup of MTBE legislation.   Senators were not able to
agree on a workable approach, mainly over provisions related to the mandate
of ethanol as a replacement for MTBE.  It is likely that this issue will be
considered sometime in September when Congress returns.

 Illinois SIP - Mary Schoen will continue to meet with other IPPs in Illinois
over the development of the Illinois SIP.   Illinois EPA has recently raised
concerns about peaking plants, so we are working to make sure our facility is
not disadvantaged in any way.

EPA New Source Review Enforcement -Jeff Keeler provided information and
analysis to ENA Downstream origination about a recent "New Source Review"
enforcement settlement reached by EPA/DOJ and BP Amoco and Koch refining
facilities.  The 2 refiners agreed to pay fines and reduce emissions at
several facilities.   ENA is interested in this information as insight into
what other costs or risks current and potential customers may be facing.

Canadian Power Purchase- Mary Schoen and Susan Worthen continue to  work with
Jim Steffes regarding environmental due diligence on  ENA Canada's proposed
power purchase agreement from coal-fired power plants in Alberta, providing
analysis of environmental regulatory factors that could impact the deal.

 EES California Reporting Error -- Stacey Bolton and the California
government affairs team will be meeting with the California Energy Commission
and Center for Resource Solutions (who run the Green-E certification program)
next week to discuss the errors made in 1999 reporting on "green" products
EES offered in California.   Enron will present its plan to notify customers,
present an amended report, send out new labels, and correctly register the
product.

National Credit Trading Program:  Stacey Bolton  spoke at the "GlobeEx"
energy conference in Las Vegas this week, advocating the need for a national
credit trading program -- a uniform platform by which suppliers can comply
w/varying renewable portfolio standards as well as provide verification for
product offerings.  She received positive feedback from several companies and
environmental groups in attendance, and will continue to lead efforts to gain
momentum behind this issue.

 Enron Building South Safety- Mike Terraso will meet with Bill Donovan next
week to review contractor safety plan contingencies.


I just forwarded directions to Pastor Beth's and a note about the number of
people.  Did you get it?  We just got Windows 2000 and I'm having trouble
with my emails...

	"Preisinger, Andrea" <PREISINGER@tmh.tmc.edu>
	05/09/2000 02:35 PM

		 To: "'Tana Jones'" <Tana_Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: This weekend

Just wondering how many people we will be serving.  Also, are you going to
send directiosn to you house?

Thanks-

Andrea


Ben,
Thanks for having us up to Beaver Creek this weekend.  We had a wonderful
time.  I told Raul that Colorado needs to be our vacation every summer bc
this was our best one by far!  Anyway, it was a fun spending time with you
guys and your parents in such a relaxing place.

We need to get together soon and share pictures.  Also, I don't know if I
can go that long without laughing with and at you!

Tell Megan thanks too!
Amy


Let's get together and get this traders' roundtable going.  I propose:  You,
me Lavo (if he's interested), Vince K, John Arnold, Phillip Allen, Mike
Grigsby, (those three from US gas), Rogers Hearndon, and Fletch Sturm (East
Power), Mike Bradley, John Nowlan,.  This list covers gas, power,
crude/products, rates, and vince's economic views.  Any other
people/groups/commodities we should have represented?

Jeff


Shirley,

Please, register me.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
09:16 AM ---------------------------

Public Relations@ENRON
03/10/2000 07:33 PM
To: All Enron Downtown
cc:
Subject: Information break

* * * * *    Information Break   * * * * *

Do you recognize the techniques people use to elicit trade secrets and other
business information from Enron?
Learn to combat industrial and economic espionage.

Speaker:

John Nolan
Founder of Phoenix Consulting Group,
a Business Intelligence solutions firm

John spent 22 years in intelligence collection and counterintelligence
special operations
in the United States, Asia and Europe.  Today, he is recognized in the
mainstream business community
 and featured in media such as Forbes, George and CNN.

When:  Friday, March 17, 2000, 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.  Where:  EB5C2

To make a reservation, call 3-1941 and select option 1.

(Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own.)


<<5-17-01.pdf>>

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005

 - 5-17-01.pdf


If you send the letter, please forward a copy to me.  SS


What do you think?


fyi, i returned the call.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/11/2000 05:01 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Media Story

Refer such calls to Karen Denne in Houston.  Thanks.

	George Waidelich@EES
	12/11/2000 04:57 PM

		 To: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Media Story

I received a call from Tim Roberts of the Energy Journal in San Jose CA.
They are writing a piece on the current energy situation in CA and how it is
effecting IPP's and power marketers and their intentions towards the CA
market in the future.  He would like to speak with somebody at Enron.  As far
as I know, I do no have media clearance so I had no comment.

If Enron wants an opportunity to make a public statement we should talk to
this guy as early as possible today or tomorrow.  He can be reached at
408-299-1821.

George Waidelich
925-543-3801


Former SLA Fugitive Sara Jane Olson Sentenced to 10 Years to Life

http://www.abcnews.go.com

ABCNEWS.com:  Up to the Moment, Up to You (tm)
http://abcnews.go.com
---
You received this mail because you subscribed via ABCNEWS.com. If you would like to stop receiving these mailings, log into our mailcenter at http://login.mailpref.go.com/unsubscribe .

Please do not respond to this mail. Questions or comments can be submitted at
http://abcnews.go.com/service/help/abccontact.html


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 11:47 AM -----

	RRichards@milbank.com
	08/25/2000 10:40 AM

		 To: craig.clark@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com, clint.walden@enron.com,
kevin.d.jordan@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com,
brent.vasconcellos@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Delta

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Richards, Raymond
Sent:?? Friday, August 25, 2000 6:02 AM
To:???? 'doug.mcdowell@enron.com'; 'gareth.bahlmann@enron.com';
'Fcochran@velaw.com'; 'acurry@velaw.com'; 'mary.cook@enron.com'

Cc:???? Richards, Raymond
Subject:??????? Delta

Attached below please find the following documents marked to show changes
from the last draft distributed:

(1)? Enron/Delta Swap Confirmation;
(2)? Enron/Citibank Swap Confirmation;
(3)? Enron/Delta Fiscal Agency Agreement; and

Enron/Citibank Fiscal Agency Agreement.?

Please note that the attached have not been reviewed by Citibank and
therefore remain subject to their comments as well as the continuing internal
review by Milbank, Tweed.?

 <<REDLINE.DOC>>  <<REDLINE.DOC>>  <<REDLINE.DOC>>  <<REDLINE.DOC>>

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - REDLINE.DOC
 - REDLINE.DOC
 - REDLINE.DOC
 - REDLINE.DOC


Can you please send me Ida-West's fax # and Phone #.
Thanks
Ben


Frank,

We are located at 1400 Smith. Any cab driver can identify the Enron building.
When you arrive,
please, call me at 3-3848  from the reception to be admitted into the
building.

Alternative phone numbers: 3-5290 (my assistant Shirley Crenshaw). You can
also try to call me on
my cell phone: 713 898 9960.

The Research Group meeting starts at 11:30 and lasts till 1:00. Can you make
a presentation
about your research projects? What audio/video equipment do you need? What
sandwich would
you like to have for lunch?

We shall make a hotel reservation for you Thursday night.

Vince

"Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> on 12/18/2000 07:02:46 AM
To: Vince Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: bmierts@enron.com
Subject: Thursday visit

Hi Vince, Looking forward to seeing you Thursday.? I arrive at Houston-Bush
on USAir 1769 at 10:55 AM.? Please let me know where to go.? I also want to
verify that you have booked me a hotel? for Thurs night.? Many thanks, and
see you soon, Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold
WP Carey Professor

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507? telephone
(215) 573-4217? fax
?


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude28.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas28.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil28.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded28.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG28.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG28.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL28.pdf


Per our meeting, attached are the revised drafts of the weather GTC's
incorporating the tax language and completing the  Reporting Service,
Reporting Agency and Data Source information.


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 12, 2001

Notice ID: 3179
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 13-15, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

TENNESSEE:

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 13, 2001 - New IPP customers received equal shares of
available capacity or their October 13, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever
was less.

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 14, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP customers.
There is no capacity for IPP increases.

UNIONVILLE:  OCTOBER 15, 2001 - There is no capacity for new IPP customers.
Flowing IPP customers nominating increases received 101.46% of their October
14, 2001 flowing volumes or their October 15, 2001 nominated quantities,
whichever was less.

PAULDING:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for
secondary firm customers.

DELIVERIES:

ALGONQUIN:

HANOVER:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for
secondary firm customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available
PAL Lends/Unparks         Available

Excess MDIQ               Not Available +
ISS Injections            Not Available
SIT Injections            Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks        Not Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas days of October 13-15, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on October 13-15, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Friay, October 12, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


Attached is the revised Schedule I to the Bisti Compression Services
Agreement Amendment.  Please replace the existing Exhibit with this one.  If
you have any questions, please call me at x-33512.  Thanks for your all help
in getting these done timely.


Mark,

The ETA does contain some redlines (Tools/Highlight Changes). Not sure if
these reflect changes from NA or not - perhaps David Minns can shed some
light?

Dave

Mark Taylor
03/02/2000 01:07 AM
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Australian ETA

Dave - Do we have a copy of this marked to show the changes fromt he NA ETA?

David Forster
02/29/2000 09:55 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Australian ETA

Mark,

We have customers who are now filling out the new form of the Australian PA.
As a result, we will need an Online Australian ETA very shortly.

Can you please approve/disapprove of the ETA form forwarded by David Minns?
(copy attached). Once we have your approval, we will put it on the system.

Thanks,

Dave


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
03:04 PM ---------------------------

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 06/26/2000 01:27:41 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: contact

Vince,
The weekend of July 15, 2000 is fine for us.  Which day is better for
you--Friday or Saturday?

Do you want to go to the Woodlands for a show, or just visit?  Also, let me
know if I can bring something.

Thanks and we look forward to meeting your family.

jana


Call me on Beau.  A couple thoughts.

If they are so screwed why can't we get a couple million in fees.

Also, remember that the Canadian commericial group wears the debt not the
credit group.


Bruce - I am sending you 2 original executed Gas Processing Agreement documents, and a Certificate that certifies that Jesus can sign on behalf of Juniper.  Please execute the Processing Agreement and return one original to:

Kathy Kelly
c/o enron
1400 smith, 6th floor
77002

As you will be able to tell, we changed up a couple things...please be sure to initial the changes.

thanks
joan


Tana,

Jason's e-mail address is attached below.

----- Forwarded by Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron on 09/08/2000 02:24 PM -----

	Samantha Boyd
	09/08/2000 10:38 AM

		 To: "JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>
		 cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Schedule to Master Agreement - Arizona Public Service Company

	"JASON PETERS" <PETEJ@andrews-kurth.com>
	09/07/2000 07:48 PM

		 To: <samantha.boyd@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Schedule to Master Agreement - Arizona Public Service Company

  Samantha,

Attached please find a clean copy of the above-referenced agreement.  It is
ready for execution.  Execution copies should be sent to:

 Kathleen Muller
Senior Attorney, Law Department
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
M/S 8695  P.O. Box 53999
Phoenix, AZ 85072-3999
Phone:............(602) 250-2584
Fax :.................(602) 250-3393
email:..............kathleen.muller@pinnaclewest.com

Please call me at 713-220-4124 should you have any comments or questions.

Thanks,

Jason

 - Schedule.DOC


Stacey,

Please find attached our outstanding 1st quarter power questions.  As we are
to
sign off on the 10Q by Monday, April 14th, please provide your responses as
soon
as possible.

(See attached file: Updated#2 1st Quarter 2001  Power Questions.doc)

If you have any questions, please call me at X6-6269.  Thank you for your
help.

Jennifer

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - Updated#2 1st Quarter 2001  Power Questions.doc


Attached please find the following documents:

Thanks,
Lydia

x3-9338


http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/ce/feature/0,1518,2459991_54,00.html

http://cnnsi.com/basketball/nba/2000/nba_draft/news/2000/05/25/mock_draft1/


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

The IBM e-Energy Executive Forum ) "Personalization, Partnership, and
Profitability"

Designed for executives in the utility industry looking to leverage Customer
Relationship Management in the competitive marketplace. Topics will focus on
how process and technology can be leveraged to gain competitive advantage.
Featured speakers will include IT analysts, solution partners, IBM
executives, and customers including: John Goodman, President of e-Satisfy;
Richard Grimes, Director of CRM Energy Services; David Bonnett, Global
e-Energy Sales Executive, Siebel Systems.

www.ibm.com

In an exclusive SCIENTECH PowerHitters Interview, Pat Wood, Chairman of the
Texas Public Utility Commission, discusses the issues surrounding Texas and
California deregulation, as Texas announces its Texas Electric Choice Pilot
Program.  See the questions Wood was asked at: www.ConsultRCI.com
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 27, 2001

Two Coal Plants Announced In the Past Two Weeks

by Bob Bellemare
Vice President, Utility Services

U.S. Electric Power of Point Lookout, New York, announced plans to construct
a 249 megawatt (MW) coal fired power plant at Cherry Point in Whatcom County,
Washington.  Just last week, Reliant Energy Seward LLC, a subsidiary of
Reliant Energy, announced it is planning on constructing a 520 MW circulating
fluidized bed (CFB) clean-coal power plant in Indiana County, Pennsylvania.

Analysis:  As the United States awakes from its energy policy slumber, it is
becoming increasingly apparent that the days of near complete reliance on
natural-gas-fired generation to meet our growing energy needs is coming to an
end.  According to EIA statistics, natural gas prices have risen to historic
highs with January 2001 utility deliveries exceeding $10/MMBtu, compared to
1998 and 1999 prices which floated between $2 and $3/MMBtu.  Virtually
overnight, natural gas has gone from one of the least expensive generation
fuels to one of the most expensive.  Since the January price spike, prices
have settled back down to the $4 to $5.5 /MMBtu level for Henry Hub futures
prices, but even these prices would have been considered high just twelve
months ago.

Coal, by comparison, is the United States most abundant fuel source,
constituting 95 percent of our nation's fossil energy reserves.  Coal prices
have actually dropped for utility deliveries over the past several years
according to EIA statistics.  In 1994, coal prices averaged $28.03/short-ton
($1.37/MMbtu) compared to $24.68/short-ton ($1.21/MMbtu) for second quarter
2000.  Although coal generation currently represents over 51 percent of U.S.
generation production, few plants have recently been built because of the
environmental concerns associated with coal generation and the relatively low
price for natural gas throughout the 1990s.  In 1999, U.S. coal production
actually declined by 2.1 percent which was primarily attributable to a large
drop in coal exports coupled by smaller than usual growth in coal consumption
for power generation.

But brighter days may lie ahead for the coal industry.  New, so-called
"clean-coal" technologies are being tested and developed. In the 1970s and
80s the pressurized fluidized bed coal combustor (PFBC) was developed,
removing sulfur (SO2) pollutants and limiting the formation of nitrogen oxide
(NOx) pollutants inside the boiler.  The need for scrubbers or other
post-combustion controls was eliminated by technology.  Texas New Mexico
Power (TNP) constructed two 150 MW lignite-fired units that went operational
in 1990 and 1991 based on the circulating fluidized bed (CFB) technology that
Reliant is proposing for its 520 MW facility in Pennsylvania.  The TNP One
power plant was, however, extremely costly to build.  Unit 1 cost $357
million ($2,380/kW) and Unit 2 cost $282.9 million ($1,886/kW) to construct.

Another technology being developed is the integrated gasification-combined
cycle (IGCC) technology that first converts coal into a combustible gas,
cleans the gas of virtually all pollutants, then burns the gas in a turbine
much like natural gas.  More than 99 percent of sulfur, nitrogen, and
particulate pollutants can be removed in the process.  Three gasification
power plants have been built in Florida, Indiana, and Nevada.  In the early
1990s, PSI Energy and Destec teamed up to construct a 262 MW IGCC generating
unit at the Wabash River Project in Indiana for a total installation cost of
$592 million ($2,260/kW).  In 1996, TECO completed the construction of its
250 MW IGCC generating unit at Polk Power station in Florida for a total
installation cost of $508 million ($2,032/kW).

Japan has also experimented with clean-coal technologies.  In 1998, Hokkaido
Electric Power Co. Inc. started commercial operation of a 75 MW PFBC power
plant.  Test operations are being carried out at two other plants, the 250 MW
unit of Chugoku Electric Power Co. and the 350 MW unit of Kyushu Electric
Power Co.  Japan is also testing a pilot scale (1 MW) molten carbonate fuel
cell (MCFC) at a Chubu Electric Power Co. site.

It is interesting to note that these advanced technologies have historically
approached the installation cost of a nuclear plant, but have all the
operational costs of a coal plant.  Now market conditions have changed, and
despite the high capital and operating costs, clean-coal technologies can
economically compete with natural-gas-fired generation, if gas prices
continue to remain high.  Additionally, expectations are that the next
generation of clean-coal power plants will cost significantly less than the
early pioneers' cost.  The Department of Energy (DOE) for example, assumes an
IGGC power plant can be built for $1,315/kW with an average heat rate of
8,470 Btu/kWh in its "Annual Energy Outlook 2000" report.

The DOE deserves a great deal of credit for bringing clean-coal technology to
the point of commercialization.  In 1984, the clean-coal experiment began in
response to the U.S./Canadian transboundary problem of acid rain.  In March
of 1987, President Reagan agreed to a new $5 billion public-private
initiative to make clean-coal technologies a reality.  The program led to 40
projects in 18 states, including co-funding demonstration projects such as
the PSI/Destec and TECO facilities.  In the mid-1980s the only options for
reducing NOx pollution cost $3,000 per ton; today's low NOx burners have
reduced this cost to under $200/ton.  These low NOx burners have also reduced
emission levels from 700 parts per million (ppm) in the early 1970s to 100
ppm today.  Furthermore, the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) process
reduces more than 80% of the NOx contained in coal combustion gas. The DOE
reports that 75 percent of all coal-fired capacity in this country is now
outfitted with low-NOx burners.  Similarly, the cost for scrubbing
technology, which removes sulfur pollutants, has been reduced 75 percent
since the 1970s.

The improvement of power generation efficiency will be one of the most
important technical issues for coal power plants because of its high carbon
content.  The latest commercial plant has achieved a thermal efficiency of 43
percent by increasing steam temperature and pressure.  Even with these
improved efficiencies, the coal power plant of the future may still be unable
to achieve the substantial greenhouse gas reductions that could be necessary
to address global climate change concerns.  There are other existing
environmental regulations that may also limit the adoption of new coal
generation.  The SIP Call rule requires 22 Eastern states and the District of
Columbia to reduce NOx emission by a specified amount by May 2003, with much
of the reductions expected to come from coal-fired power plants.  In 1997,
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter and ozone
were adopted with an anticipated compliance cost for full attainment
estimated at $37 billion per year (particulate) and $10 billion per year
(ozone) respectively.  The Supreme Court is reviewing these EPA rules, and
recently supported the EPA's right to regulate these emissions [see 3/1/01
IssueAlert at www.ConsultRCI.com].  These rules are significant since they
will lead to additional NOx and SO2 emission reductions, the two precursors
to fine airborne particles.  Mercury reductions are also being contemplated.
In November 1999 the EPA filed lawsuits against seven utility companies for
Clean Air Act violations.  In a settlement with TECO, TECO agreed to cut NOx
and SO2 emissions by 85 percent by 2010 and pay a $3.5 million civil
penalty.

But in the end, the nation will likely turn to coal to help meet its growing
energy demands.  Great strides have been made to reduce the environmental
impact of this abundant fuel source.  Since 1970, the use of coal has more
than doubled while emissions of sulfur and nitrogen pollutants have declined
by 70 percent and 40 percent, respectively.  If we can continue to achieve
even greater emission reductions, coal may well help provide the energy
bridge to the future.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


We would like to get a master netting agreement going with MidAmerican:

MidAmerican Energy Company

Physical Gas with ENA (GISB - 96009462)
Financial Products with ENA (Master Agreement - 96004750)
Physical Coal with ENA (master coal dated 1/1/99 96023900)
Physical Power with EPMI (Power Master Bilateral 96092908 or 95001154)
Emissions with EPMI (SO2 Allowance Master 96038660)

Outgoing Guaranties:

$10mm covering ENA for financial products
$5mm covering EPMI for physical power
$15mm covering ENA for physical coal
$2mm covering ENA for physical gas

The contact at MidAmerican is Brian Wiese (515) 281-2618, bjwiese@midamerican.com

Give me a call with any questions.

Thanks,

Max


Due to EWS Legal re-organization and limits of Lexis-Nexis' security
infrastructure, your old Lexis-Nexis IDs are deleted and new IDs are issued
under the new bill group by your cost center.   Sorry for the inconvenience!
I am sending all your new ID cards to Becky Spencer to distribute to you.
Please toss the old one when you receive the new one.   If you don't receive
a new ID card and would like to have Lexis-Nexis access, please let me know.

Tomorrow is the Lexis Day for Legal Groups.  Free trainings are scheduled
from 9:00 - 4:00 at EB48C2.  Lunch is provided by Lexis. You may sign up for
one or two or whole day trainings.  Go to legal portal Calendar or Lexis Day
banner to get detailed class schedule  http://legaledge.corp.enron.com/  .
If interested, R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x36775 as soon as you can.

Thanks,
Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


Chris:

Attached is Change Order #2 for your review. It would probably be a good idea
if you executed it rather than Janet since it pertains to one of your
projects. If you have any issues / changes / questions, let me know. Also let
me know if you need any assistance regarding the DASH for this change order.

Regards,

Ben


Cargill-Alliant will participate.

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: rcarroll@bracepatt.com [mailto:rcarroll@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:29 AM
To: nolan.steiner@avistacorp.com; dvermillion@avistaenergy.com;
asettanni@bracepatt.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com; kcurry@bracepatt.com;
GFergus@brobeck.com; kabarowski, andrzej /hdqt; fantle, phillip m.
/mtkl; psteel@coral-energy.com; psteele@coral-energy.com;
rreilley@coral-energy.com; elizabeth.sager@enron.com;
mary.hain@enron.com; richard.b.sanders@enron.com; smara@enron.com;
snovose@enron.com; sstack@enron.com; jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com;
sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com; jklauber@llgm.com; jlhuemoe@llgm.com;
gerspamer@mofo.com; kirvin@mofo.com; kzeitlin@mofo.com;
rloeffler@mofo.com; jmcgrane@morganlewis.com; mgriffen@morganlewis.com;
bcurrey@omm.com; jstamper@omm.com; mawilliams@omm.com;
john.fryer@pacificorp.com; hydeefeldstein@paulhastings.com;
nancy.loftin@pinnaclewest.com; Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com;
dmperlman@powersrc.com; rosteen@powersrc.com; hao@quinnemanuel.com;
dgarber@sempra.com; wdsmith@sempra.com; rbeitler@sempratrading.com;
PARAMFJORD@STOEL.COM; rcjosephson@STOEL.COM; SJKAPLAN@STOEL.COM;
mbrosterman@stroock.com; mgoldstein@stroock.com; pjazayeri@stroock.com;
theftler@stroock.com; ayudkowsky@strook.com; cfr@vnf.com; gdb@vnf.com;
hes@vnf.com; jrr@vnf.com
Cc: Andrew.Haller@pacificorp.com
Subject: CONFERENCE CALL MONDAY AT 3:00

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

I was asked to set up a conference call for Monday (3/19) at 3:00
Eastern with regulatory and bankruptcy counsel for the nine Complainants
to discuss the interrelation between the FERC Chargeback complaint
proceeding (and the Amendment 22 matter), the District Court case before
Judge Moreno, and the Bankruptcy proceeding, and to discuss strategy.
Dial-in #: 1-800-403-2008
Participants #: 143570
The following issues have been identified as issues for discussion:

1.  Likelihood that Bankruptcy Court will grant PX motion to modify
stay; including feasibility and effort by parties to file answer in
support of motion, including whether it would be realistic to request
that the PX's motion be considered on a more expedited basis (PX asked
for 3/30 hearing date) in light of the FERC Complaint proceeding;

2.  Status and approach for possible settlement with PX for release of
collateral assuming Bankruptcy Court modifies stay.

3.  Feasibility of asking Bankruptcy Court to immediately release all
collateral in excess of amount needed to satisfy (1) vendors, (2)
existing and anticipated future defaults of SCE and PG&E, and (3)
reasonable costs.  In this regard, does anyone have a handle on whether
the collateral exceeds the total of the foregoing matters?

4.  Any comments on (1) answer to PX answer to Complaint, and (2) answer
to PX request for clarification in Amendment No. 22 proceeding;
including the timing of such filings with FERC.

This email does not address bankruptcy counsel for all parties.  If you
wish to have your client's bankruptcy counsel on the call, please inform
them of the time and relevant information for the call.
This call will likely be extremely unwieldy, so I would request the
parties to consolidate their participants where possible.  Also, please
do not forward this information as it addresses confidential litigation
matters.  Thanks.  See you Monday.  Ron


Peggy,
Here are the preparers and reviewers of the most companies with issues.  (These are, however, current preparers and in many cases will not be the same person who did the 2000 return).  I hope this helps!

Celeste

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Peggy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:32 AM
To:	Daigle, Celeste (EES)
Subject:	RE: SSN's

As we discussed, the Oklahoma entities that we have been notified of with outstanding tax issues are:

Black Mesa Technologies, Inc. [ Celeste Daigle ]  ?

Clinton Energy Management Services, Inc. [ Celeste Daigle ]  Marguerite Nguyen, Rick Laird

EGS Hydrocarbons Corp. [ Celeste Daigle ]  Todd Richards, Mary Fischer

Enron Asset Management Resources, Inc. [ Celeste Daigle ]  ?

Enron Cushing Oil Marketing, Inc. (I am working with Mary Fischer on this one, but if you know anything about this, let me know) [ Celeste Daigle ]  Michelle Merritt, Mark Ng

Enron Energy Services Capital Corp. [ Celeste Daigle ]  Celeste Daigle, Rick Laird

Enron Engineering & Construction Company [ Celeste Daigle ]   Dixie Riddle

Enron Hydrocarbons Marketing Corp. [ Celeste Daigle ]  Kathleen Ashton, Mark Ng

Enron Liquid Fuels, Inc [ Celeste Daigle ]  Todd Richards, Mary Fischer .

Enron Machine & Mechanical Services, Inc. [ Celeste Daigle ]  ?

Enron Reserve Acquisition Corp. [ Celeste Daigle ]  Tidd Richards, Mary Fischer

Louisiana Gas Marketing Company [ Celeste Daigle ]  ?

If you can direct assist me with any of these, or direct me to the proper person who can, it would really be appreciated.  Thanks for your help.  If you need anything further, just let me know.

Peggy Miller, Specialist
Corporate Services
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Room 4804c
713/853-1632; 713/646-8007, Fax
Email: peggy.miller@enron.com


Louise,

Here are the estimated 2001 Mexico City office expenses per the Plan:

	Compensation			$445,876
	Benefits & Payroll Taxes		    42,629
	Employee Expenses		    97,500
	Outside Services		      5,580
	Supplies & Expenses		      8,248
	3rd Party Rent			   143,612
	Allocations			   211,484
	TOTAL 2001 MEXICO CITY	 $954,929

Here are the actual 2000 YTD Mexico City office expenses:
	Compensation			$428,215
	Benefits & Payroll Taxes		    42,629
	Employee Expenses		    79,450
	Communications Expense	    43,594
	Outside Services		      4,852
	Supplies & Expenses		      7,172
	Rent Expense			   124,880
	Other Expenses			         330
	Value Added Tax Expense	         380
	TOTAL 2000 MEXICO CITY	 $731,502

Let me know if you need anything else.

Regards,

NHV
x5-3920

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Friday, March 16, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Vu, Nancy H.
Subject:

Please also send me extimated expenditure for the year with breakouts - the annual number for 2001 is of more interest than YTD - I also would like to know last years number.

Thanks

Louise


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/29/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------
From: Britt Davis on 06/28/2000 04:38 PM
To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Transwestern v. El Paso /PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY
WORK-PRODUCT

 As requested by Lou, attached for your review is a presuit litigation
analysis memo.  Don't hesitate to call if you have further questions.

         B.K.D.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 11:12 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	02/21/2001 07:37 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>,
<Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
<jmpa@dynegy.com>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <MNelson@electric.com>,
<RSchlanert@electric.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>,
<athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>, <kmagruder@newpower.com>,
<peter_bray@newpower.com>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, <AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments of PG&E on the Draft Decision

...are attached.
?
Dan
 - Comments of PG&E on the Draft Decision.doc


Mark:

I spoke briefly to Steve Pruett this past week regarding the Cypress JOA cash
call issue that you had inquired about.   As I mentioned in my voicemail to
you, I was not aware of the farmout arrangement or JOA with Kelley and had
not been asked to review the farmout agreement or the JOA.  I obtained copies
of the documents and asked Steve to fill me in on how the situation
developed.  Steve was out of the office much of last week; he followed up
Friday with the attached email message.

As Steve mentions in his email, there were extenuating circumstances and
timing issues, but certainly it was a mistake for a rig to be moved and a
well spudded without agreements in place and for documents to be signed
without appropriate review and approval.  I understand that John Thompson and
Steve made the decision to move the rig and spud the well when they had a
term sheet and draft agreement that they anticipated being able to sign in
short order.   Allen Wilhite and I frequently work together to get
documentation finalized and in form for Steve's execution.  From Steve's
reaction when I told him I had not reviewed or initialled the farmout (which
had been initialled by Allen), I believe he had assumed that had been the
case in this situation as well, although he did not try to place
responsibility on Allen.

Steve is one of the best and the brightest I've worked with at Enron.  He is
extremely busy, working very hard to manage the portfolio of existing E & P
assets, as well as working on new deals.  I have worked with Steve enough to
know that he would never have intentionally failed to follow our procedures.
I think this incident was a mistake that will not be repeated.  I will remind
the ECR group at Monday's staff meeting that review by the legal department
is required before any agreements are signed.

Where do we go from here?  Would you like for me to arrange a meeting with
Steve?  Please let me know if there is anything further you would like for me
to do.

Steve raises the issue of staffing in his email.  In light of the level of
activity for new ECR deals, time that is required in assisting Global Finance
with Condor and a funding vehicle for the VPPs, and the increased legal time
required as Bonne Terre, Cypress, and Vastar are no longer managed by third
parties, being able to provide quality and timely legal advice is
increasingly difficult, and staffing is an issue that I hope can be addressed
soon.

Teresa

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 06:04 PM -----

	Steve Pruett@ENRON
	11/09/2000 07:18 PM

		 To: teresa.g.bushman@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kelly Farmout Agreement - Cypress Venture

Teresa:

Thank you for approaching me directly about the issue of my failure to obtain
legal review of the subject farmout agreement in Enron Energy Capital
Resources' (ECR) Cypress Venture.  The circumstances of the event follow to
the best of my knowledge, without confirming with Allen Wilhite who is
presently inaccessible:

Rozel Energy, led by Bill Rogers, identified a high potential / relatively
low risk prospect in late August on acreage held by Kelley Oil & Gas (sub of
Contour Energy).  He commissioned a lease check and found that Kelley
controlled 90%+ of the acreage, but it was set to expire on Sept. 28, 2000.

Rozel, after reviewing the prospect with ECR technical personnel and
receiving approval to do so, sought to acquire top leases over the prospect
only to find that others had already top-leased a significant portion of the
prospect.  Had the Kelley lease expired, these parties would have controlled
and drilled the prospect.

Rozel, with the help of Allen Wilhite, approached Kelley for a farmout.
Kelley asked to be presented with a prospect review under the concept that
Kelley would be willing to farmout approximately 50% of its interest, or
farmout all of its interest retaining an ORRI convertible to a WI APO or
higher ORRI at its option.

Kelley elected to participate for 50% of its interest in the well before the
farmout agreement was drafted.  Kelley agreed to general terms in a brief
letter agreement.  Kelley sought to operate the well, which ECR rejected due
to Kelley's poor track record in drilling deep S. Louisiana wells.  Rozel
Energy is the operator in absence of Enron having an operating vehicle.
Rozel employed a seasoned contract operator in S. Louisiana, Stokes and
Speiler, who are being managed daily by Arvel Martin and Bob Devine, who each
have over 25 years experience in mangement of drilling operations.

Inasmuch as the operation of the well was in dispute, the negotiation of the
JOA and the farmout agreement was strained and Kelley was non-responsive to
Allen's efforts to finalize the agreement.  Allen, Craig Fox, Arvel Martin
and I met with Kelley's Land Manager and VP of Operations and established a
dialogue and rapport (we thought).  The initial draft of the farmout
agreement was put together on Sept. 15th by Kelley and Allen.  Allen did not
share the draft with you then as we were still apart on certain deal
provisions, particularly who would operate.  ECR members were in dispute over
the importance of operations.

With Kelley's consent and our high level of confidence that we would reach
terms with Kelley, we moved our rig in and spudded the well a few days prior
to the Sept. 28th lease expiration.  Allen and I continued to be frustrated
with not reaching final contract terms with Kelley after the well was
spudded.  I pressed Allen to finalize an agreement and he presented an
agreement signed by Kelley on October 16, 2000 (effective Sept. 15, 2000).
Following my signature and upon his departure to Kelley's offices to deliver
the document, I asked him if you had reviewed JOA and he said no.  I asked
him if it was required or customary for Legal to review JOAs, and he said it
was sometimes done but there are rarely revisions.  I did not ask
specifically about farmout agreements.  The Kelley farmout was the first
farmout in a directly-owned asset that I had encountered.  I failed to
recognize the distinction between numerous farmouts that I had seen executed
by our GP's in our Juniper, Bonne Terre (historically) and Texland ventures,
and a farmout with Enron's name on the line.

It is my job as a Vice President to know what requires Legal review.  I have
been made aware that farmout agreements and JOA's in directly owned assets
(as opposed to LP's with a GP such as Juniper) require Legal review and
signoff.  The compliance meeting last week underscored that point.  We had
outside counsel (Lisa Jaubert) under your direction review the Tri-C and
Manti farmout agreements and your initials are evidence of your approval.

I respect you as an attorney and business partner and commit that I will be
diligent about obtaining your review of agreements and ask you when in doubt
as to whether legal review and approval is required on a particular item or
issue.

The demands that our large oil & gas exploration portfolio places on you is
another issue that we should discuss.  The Bonne Terre, Cypress and Vastar
ventures have significant drilling activity that has commenced and will
continue.  Dissolution of Bonne Terre and distribution of the assets to ENA
(to be held in BT Exploration LLC) will increase the legal and commercial
activity level.  We have another prospect in Cypress that is being promoted
and will be spudded in the next 10 days, so expect to see a farmout agreement
on the S. Riceville prospect late next week.

I would be pleased to discuss these matters with you and Mark Haedicke in
person if you desire.  I regret my failure to obtain your review and approval
of the Kelley farmout agreement and commit to preventing a repeat of the
mistake.  I am concerned about the pace of agreements that we face in the
immediate future on our direct-owned ventures.   I look forward to working
with you on ways to better manage our business process in Cypress-Acadian,
Bonne Terre & Vastar ventures.


Skilling is meeting with Heath Scheisser at 2PM


Please approve the attached expense report and forward it to accounting with
a cc: to me.  Sorry for the low amount ($37.83), but all expense reports need
to be in by the 13th of this month and this is all she has right now.  Thanks!


This looks fantastic.  I apologize profusely. I've got a dozen assigments to
finish by COB.  But having read this, you obviously needed no help from me.
Let me know how the call with Riordan goes.

Best,
Jeff

	Karen Denne
	05/11/2001 02:16 PM

		 To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Information for Call to LA Mayor Dick Riordan

Ken -- Thank you for making next Thursday, May 17 available for CEO meetings
in California.  We are working to set up two meetings -- one in Los Angeles
and one in Silicon Valley (we'll call on Scott McNealy's contact person to
help pull the Northern California meeting together).   For the Los Angeles
meeting, we'd like you to call Mayor Dick Riordan (213-847-3560) and ask for
his help in pulling together a group of key, influential business leaders.
As background, Riordan is a very wealthy Republican businessman who has been
term-limited out and has not yet made public his future political aspirations
(a bid for governor has been mentioned by insiders).

You might congratulate him on helping to settle the Writer's Guild strike and
ask if he'd now like to resolve the energy crisis (He's in a bit of a spat
with Dave Freeman over who can claim credit for LADWP's success during this
energy situation -- see attached LA Times article).  You can say you've been
told that he was one of the clearer heads during the deregulation process and
were instrumental in keeping DWP out of the regulatory mess.

This is an opportunity for Riordan to help broker a solution, and that's why
you're calling him.  You met with Robert Day (Trust Co of the West) who
suggested that you call Riordan and enlist his support.

Explain about our comprehensive solution -- business support is critical to
garner political support.

You'll be in Los Angeles next Thursday.  Ask if he could invite and host a
meeting of key business leaders and introduce you.  I've attached a suggested
list of prominent businessmen, close associates and personal friends of
Riordan's.  We'd like to position this meeting as an insider's conversation
of what's going on with the energy situation.  This meeting should be for
principals only.

Ask Riordan to identify someone in his office who we can work with to set up
the meeting.  Enron's consultant in LA (Marathon Communications) will work to
coordinate the event.

If Riordan is not available next Thursday, ask him if he would ask Eli Broad
(chairman of Sun America and a Democratic billionaire) or Jerry Perenchio
(chairman of Univision) to host the meeting.

Proposed Invitees

*Eli Broad - Chairman, Sun America
*Ron Burkle - Yucaipa Companies
Jeffrey Katzenberg - DreamWorks
Sherry Lansing- Paramount
Nelson Rising- Catellus
Bob Daly - LA Dodgers
Ray Irani - Occidental Petroleum
*Jerry Perenchio - Univison
Michael Eisner/Bob Iger - Disney
Ed Roski - Majestic Realty
Earvin Johnson/Ken Lombard - Johnson Development Corporation
Bruce Karatz - Kaufmann & Broad
Terry Semel - Yahoo!
Gary Winnick - Global Crossing
Henry Yuen - Gemstar
*Carl McKinsey
*Liam McGee - Bank of America
*Barry Munitz - Getty Trust
*Gordon Binder - Amgen (ret)
David Baltimore - Cal Tech
Danny Villanueva - Bastion Capital
Phil Anschutz - Qwest Communications, Staples Center
*Dennis Tito - civilian spaceman (former LADWP Commissioner)
Kent Kresa - Northrop Grumann

Sunday, May 6, 2001
Riordan and Freeman's Feud Erupts in Public
Power: Each questions the other's role in keeping the city free of
California's energy crisis.
By MICHAEL FINNEGAN, TERENCE MONMANEY, Times Staff Writers

?????With California mired in energy troubles, Mayor Richard Riordan and his
former power chief S. David Freeman trumpet the extraordinary fortune of Los
Angeles: no rate hikes and no blackouts.
?????Yet Riordan and Freeman have sullied their mutual success story by
waging bitter campaigns to discredit each other--at first behind the scenes
but now in public.
?????Pettiness, ingratitude, conflicts of interest, overblown claims of
achievement: Such is the back and forth between two leaders who would seem to
have good reason to pat each other on the back.
?????To Freeman, who has resigned as general manager of the L.A. Department
of Water and Power to become chief energy advisor to Gov. Gray Davis, it
seems Riordan resents his high-profile role in trying to steer California out
of the energy crisis.
?????So the mayor, Freeman charged, has elbowed his way into energy issues
that he is ill-equipped to handle and taken steps along the way that could
harm the environment.
?????"With all due respect, I have 25 years of experience and knowledge--and
he has 25 days," Freeman said. "But he's the mayor, and he didn't like it
that I didn't just say yes to everything he came up with."
?????To Riordan, Freeman's efforts to fight air pollution have given short
shrift to the threat of skyrocketing power rates in Los Angeles. The mayor
said Freeman also failed to recognize potential conflicts of interest between
his city and state roles in the power crisis. And he scoffed at Freeman for
saying he had lifted morale at DWP.
?????"Morale was terrible under him," Riordan said. "I mean, they are so
relieved right now."
?????The backbiting has left associates suspecting the clash is really about
egos. City Councilwoman Ruth Galanter sees Riordan and Freeman as proud,
successful men unable to say, "I couldn't have done it without X, Y and Z."
?????"Each of them is used to being the boss and taking pleasure at being
recognized as the boss," she said.
?????Much of the conflict has taken place in private meetings. And the mayor,
a Republican multimillionaire, has taken pains to play down his dispute with
Freeman, a liberal Democrat from Tennessee who wears a cowboy hat and speaks
with a Southern drawl.
?????In an interview after his resignation, Freeman laid out the conflict
point by point, often in terms bluntly critical of the mayor. One of his
concerns, Freeman said, was that Riordan in his final two months as mayor
could reverse the agency's progress in protecting the environment.
?????Freeman cited Riordan's plans concerning coal-fired power plants in
Nevada and Utah that are partly controlled by the DWP, the nation's largest
municipal utility. The first is the Mohave Generating Station in Laughlin,
Nev., a plant that has been blamed for spreading some of the haze that
shrouds the Grand Canyon. The DWP had planned to sell its stake in the plant,
but Freeman said Riordan ordered him to back out of the sale.
?????He described the mayor's move as a sign that Riordan and his appointees
on the board that oversees DWP were "completely insensitive to the fact that
that power plant is one of the most environmentally troubling plants in the
West."
?????"I've worked real hard to try to build some environmental sensitivity
into the DWP policy," Freeman said. "And I am concerned as to whether the
current commissioners and the mayor have that sensitivity, and what they
might do in the interim to basically overturn the progress we've made."
?????The other plant is part of the Intermountain Power Project in central
Utah. Riordan has proposed building a new coal-fired generating unit there,
but Freeman said he objected because of the pollution it would cause.
?????In both cases, Riordan said he was striking the appropriate balance
between protecting the environment and meeting the energy needs of Los
Angeles at an affordable cost. By keeping its share of the Mohave plant and
expanding the Utah plant, Los Angeles can avert the astronomical price hikes
of natural gas--and the sharp rise in ratepayers' bills that would follow,
Riordan said.
?????Natural gas, which provides 26% of the fuel for DWP plants, causes less
air pollution than coal, which provides 51%. The rest is mainly nuclear and
hydroelectric. Los Angeles has averted rate hikes and blackouts in part
because the DWP relies less on natural gas than most other California power
providers.
?????"I favor clean air and more natural gas, but not to the point where
we're going to destroy the economy of Los Angeles," Riordan said.
?????On the Mohave plant, Riordan questioned the benefit of selling the
city's share to a buyer that would simply continue running it.
?????"It's still going to be coal-driven," he said. "How does selling it help
the environment?"
?????The tension between the two has built steadily as the state power crisis
has worsened. With the charismatic DWP chief drawing favorable news coverage
in stories on how L.A. has dodged the crisis, Riordan and the DWP
commissioners began to view him as "too big for my britches," Freeman said.
?????The conflict reached its peak on April 17, the day Freeman resigned to
become the governor's advisor. The DWP board president, Kenneth T. Lombard,
said the mayor told commissioners that day that "it made the most sense to
release him immediately."
?????"All we were doing, frankly, was release him from his responsibilities,
and then whatever time he needed to clean out his office was fine with us,"
Lombard said.
?????From Riordan's standpoint, Freeman needed to be stripped of his
authority right away because of a potential conflict of interest: The city
utility sells surplus power to the state, so Freeman would be on both sides
of the sales.
?????Freeman, who had voluntarily bowed out of a DWP meeting on the state
power crisis earlier that day, was outraged at his sudden release, in part
because he was denied the chance to say goodbye to agency employees. In an
interview, he called the conflict of interest assertion "complete malarkey."
?????"The insinuation that I have done anything less than protect the
interests of the city of Los Angeles is bordering on slanderous, considering
what I've accomplished here," he said.
?????Brian D'Arcy, who heads the union local that represents 6,000 DWP
employees, agreed that Riordan and his commissioners "kind of ran him out of
here. For David to be summarily jettisoned out of here without even a
howdy-do is absolutely tacky," D'Arcy said.
?????Riordan said Freeman deserves "an A-plus" for his work at DWP. The mayor
conceded that he knew of nothing that Freeman had done "to hurt Los Angeles."
But, he added, "when you have a conflict of interest, you have to act before
anything happens."
?????Freeman has long bridled at the oversight of DWP, not just by the mayor,
but by the agency's board and the City Council. In 1998, he called for City
Charter amendments to consolidate authority in a more independent board of
directors. The proposal went nowhere.
?????Freeman's concerns were echoed in a report to be released Monday. The
Rand Enterprise Analysis report was commissioned by the DWP. It calls for
restructuring DWP management much the way Freeman proposed. But Riordan and
Galanter, who chairs the Council's Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, rejected the concept. Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times


Team - the attendee list for this meeting has grown somewhat and we must hold it to a larger conference room.  In addition, we have some folks who will be participating by video conference.  Logistics and attendees listed below.

	Date:	Friday - October 12, 2001
	Time:	10:00a to 12:30p Central Time
	Houston Location:  	Conference Room ECN 8 C1
	London Location:	NE3002
	Portland Location:	Mount Adams
	Toronto Location:	Video conference room
	Lunch:	Will be provided for the Houston attendees.

Attendee Name	Attending From	Assistant Name
Thresa Allen	Houston
Debra Bailey	Houston
Tim Belden	Houston	Debra Davidson
Corry Bentley	Houston
Don Black	Houston	Jennifer Hutchens
Todd Busby	Houston	Dawn McDonald
Anthony Dayao	Houston	Carol Lapsley
Kenny Ha	Houston	Melinda Winkler
Bob Hall	Houston	Heather Choate
Rogers Herndon	Houston	La Donna Finnels-Neal
Brian Hudson	London via video conference	Kirsten Godden
Louise Kitchen (tentative)	Houston	Tammie Schoppe
Steve Nat	Houston
Murray O'Neil	Portland via video conference	Mary Vasquez
Beth Perlman	Houston	Cheri Westbrook
Mark Pickering	Houston	Lisa Costello
Kevin Presto	Houston	Tamara J. Black
Leslie Reeves	Houston
Jeff Richter	Houston	Debra Davidson
Steve Stock	Houston	Dan Luciano
Garrett Tripp	Toronto via video conference
Lloyd Will	Houston	Claudia Guerra

Thank you.


Reed

First of our stuff coming to you.

Following attachment is chilling calc for Ft Devens - which was the nearest
site we thought might be representative of Lowell. I will confirm the 1%
occurance basis we used (80F DB, 63.5F WB and 40% RH). I calc 790 tons/unit
hour, we used 812 tons/per in our performance run. Design basis of chilling
plant in our conceptual EPC would be maybe 3600 total tons (at the 80F/40%
point) so there would be some margin to meet 50F inlet air at slightly higher
ambients.

Obviously if you have different design point due to your owm plant data or
your own criteria, we would be glad to rerun/size based on your suggestion.
Balls in your court on this. Ft devens data coming to you by epressmail - we
can also fax (fax number ???)- just 6 sheets - I need to find the procedure
and/or worksheet on how we got the 1% point - I can't see it in this package.

Water data sheet is attached - obviously list is exhaustive but my water
doctor asks if your team could fill out as much as possible so we can give
you our best shot a suggesting a treatment system - might be helpful to have
my water guy talk with your water guy so they conceptualize the new to fit
well with the existing

I did get the voicemail, but managed to scribble unintelligebly (can't spell
either) early this AM - I have Paul B.???? at 978-454-6166 (also hit the
earse on my mail in my automatic mode this AM. Likely Ron Smith 713-345-5768
will call.

The following is the data we developed and provided to a possible Austin,
Texas job. Obviously water is different so unit cost may change but probably
will keep same pecking order.

 Water options as follows

1) Rental mobile demineralizer    $10.57/1000 gal based on 1500 hrs/yr
2) Rental mobile demin with lease degasifier  $9.75/1000 gas for 5 yr then
$7.85 on
3) Rental mobile RO with exchange tank mixed beds $7.22/1000 gal
4) Purchase RO with exchange tank mixed beds  $4.75/1000 gal
5) Purchase demineralizer    $5.77/1000 gal

Options 3, 4 and 5 require wastewater discharge. All systems assume on-site
water storage. design is that system would run 22-24 hrs per day to make
enough water for 10 hr daily run. Can run 24 hr+ with tank dropping.
Generally these should be concidered as 1 X 100% unit (capable of supporting
10 hr day) - if run more, truck water from Decker, call for emergency trailer
demin, can operate units on limited water but would see NOx increase

I need to run performance by our management and then get Tom's blessing
before I send.

Best data I have on water consumption is that with 50F CTG inlet air at
sealevel, nozzle water flow will be 22379 lb/hr and Sprint flow will be 2,206
lb/hr. Our S&S guarantee says +/- 20% on nozzle flow, no info on possible
+/-% on Sprint - I will ask S&S for clarification ASAP. Cooling tower water
consumption obviously follows chilling load and cycles of
concentration/blowdown program - water dependent!! we are conceptually using
about 60 gpm/unit for demin.

Bruce

Reed.Wills@UAECorp.COM (Reed Wills) on 02/29/2000 11:07:31 AM
To: Bruce.Golden@enron.com
cc: tswank@ect.enron.com, Tim.Fagan@UAECorp.COM (Tim Fagan),
Kevin.Foley@UAECorp.COM (Kevin Foley)

Subject: LM6000 - Summary of 2/28/00 Discussion with Enron

Attached are our notes from the discussion we had yesterday on your LM6000
units:

COSTS
     Each unit contains the following cost breakdown ($13.5m base unit,
     $0.45m bank fee, $0.31m carrying charge, $0.45m Enhanced Sprint
     upgrade, and $62,000 cooler)

     Other Options that are not applicable to UAE: Dual Fuel $280k ea.,
     chiller system ~$1.12M ea. @ 2200 tons with two cell tower

DELIVERABLES
UAE needs to send water quality data to Enron.

Enron to provide heat balance and water balance information for the units.
Information to include guaranteed performance values adjusted for site
elevation
and various ambient conditions, water consumption and discharge data, and
cooling tower requirements. Water consumption to include water injection for
NOx
control, Sprint water requirements, and cooling tower makeup water.

ADDITIONAL POINTS

- WATER QUALITY FOR INJECTION: if operating greater than 1000 hrs., short
payback on permanent RO/mixed bed system
- CHILLING: with Enhanced Sprint, chilling reduced from ~2000 tons to ~800
tons
- WATER BALANCE: water demand assumed to be 60 gallons/min per machine for E.
Sprint and NOX control
- DESIGN: UAE center line of 58' exceeds Enron minimum of 52'

     Let us know if we overlooked something or if you have any changes


Brant:
In response to your voice mail regarding El Paso, Occidental and Aquila
Canada, I can follow up with my contacts at El Paso and Occidental.  Please
provide me with the name of the attorney at Aquila Canada and I will call him
or her.

Carol


Sheila handled FV.  Today was the first day I had seen them.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 02:30:00 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

We "took" her from El Paso, not that we like to steal from our customers (we
may have another opening, by the way!!).  She's been here a couple of
months.

Just to be sure, I never saw these before correct?  She's going to do this
job but Lee thought I had seen everything before and I could just sign off

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Danetta worked it for the  Fountain Valley project.  How long has she been
here?  I didn't know there was anyone other than you.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 02:24:25
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay, unless I've lost my mind, I've never seen these docs before.  What
deal
was it on.  I don't have anything on CA Development.  I don't remember
executing any attorney's opinions?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Yes, this stuff is for the purchaser's bank.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 01:45:44
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay:  Is there anything different from the forms you and I worked on
earlier.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:32 PM
To: danetta.beaushaw@ps.ge.com
Cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; lee.johnson@ps.ge.com;
Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Danetta,

I heard a rumor that you are the one to look at this stuff.  I know that
you recently went through the process in connection with the Fountain
Valley transaction.  I'm happy to serve up those forms to Freshfields if
that makes it is easier for you.

My number is 713 345 7566.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/02/2001 10:09 AM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Kent,

I don't know whether Lee has mentioned the Delta Power deal that we are
working on.  We are taking 4 turbines and putting them in an LLC, and
selling some of the interest in the LLC to Delta Power.  Three of the
turbines are turbines formerally known as LV Co Gen turbines, and we are
buying new LM's to replace the ones we are using here.  In any event, Delta
Power is financing the deal, and they have asked that we get GE sign off on
the attached documents.  Therefore, I would be interested in your response
to the attached.

I understand that Lee is in New Orleans today, but I'll send him a copy
anyway.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/01/2001 05:10:38 PM

To:   "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "John Keffer
      (E-mail)" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
      <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Rick Vicens (E-mail)"
      <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
      <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc:   "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com if you need assistance.

As discussed during our call earlier this afternoon, please find attached
for onward transmission to GE a draft of (i) the GE Consent and Agreement
and (ii) the GE legal opinion.

Kind regards
Isabel

(See attached file: NY003700033.DOC)
(See attached file: NY003699615.DOC)


Yes - you name the time

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayslett, Rod
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Corman, Shelley; Hotte, Steve
Subject:
Importance: High

Are you 2 available thursday am to review th IT capital for NNG with Dynegy?
Rod Hayslett
Office  713-853-6178
Cell     713-201-6135
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Start Date: 3/31/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Timesheets for pay period November 16-30 are due on Friday, November 30.  Please email me your exception time.

Thank you,

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


PROJECTS
CONN. FUEL CELL PROJECT MAY FALTER ON DETAILS OF STATE FUNDING RULES

May. 24, 2001
Utility Environment Report
Page 11
(Copyright 2001 McGraw-Hill, Inc.)

Enron Corp., FuelCell Energy and a state agency are seeking to convince
Connecticut regulators to devote about $124-million over five years to a
26-MW fuel cell project. But some observers doubt the project will win
approval because the proposal does not meet state funding requirements and
was not filed properly. Under a proposal to the Connecticut Dept. of Public
Utility Control, the Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority, a quasi-public
waste agency, would tap the state's conservation fund, set up under electric
restructuring, to buy 12 fuel cell units from Enron North America, which
distributes FuelCell Energy's equipment. CRRA would schedule the output from
the fuel cell farms into the NEPOOL power grid and make the power available
to market participants. If funding is granted, the project could be finished
by the end of 2004, the proposal states.

``This multi-year market transformation initiative will provide a Class I
renewable energy source which will assist electric suppliers in meeting the
Connecticut renewable energy portfolio standard, promote economic development
within the State, provide energy in an environmentally responsible manner,
diversify the State's energy supply mix, and promote the development of a
truly competitive retail electricity market,'' the CRRA proposal states.

Under Connecticut's restructuring rules, starting July 2002, 1% of
Connecticut's load or 58 MW must be supplied by Class I renewables, which
include solar power, wind power, fuel cells, landfill methane gas and biomass
facilities. By 2009, 6% of the state's load or 348 MW must be made of Class I
renewables. The requirements, however, have been deferred because there is
not currently enough Class I capacity in the state to meet the requirements.

The Enron project faces perhaps insurmountable hurdles, said Daniel Sosland,
executive director of Environment Northeast and a member of the Energy
Conservation Management Board, which oversees the conservation fund. The
$85-million conservation fund is intended for consumer-side efficiency
efforts, not to buy generation, Sosland said. The proposal faces significant
legal hurdles, he said.

The ECMB asked the DPUC in a March 27 letter to direct entities, like the
CRRA, who didn't submit funding proposals to the board to do so before filing
them with the department. It also asked the DPUC to clarify that the fund's
purpose is to improve energy efficiency and electric use at the customers'
premises and to clarify that proposals are screened for cost effectiveness.

Current installed costs of fuel cells range between $5,000 and $6,000 per kW,
according to the CRRA proposal. Fuel cell manufacturers have not been able to
achieve economic commercialization due to the high capital expenditures
required to build up their manufacturing processes, according to the
proposal. ``This 26 MW order sufficiently supports the manufacturing
investment required to automate and develop economies of scale associated
with volume manufacturing and to begin the commercialization of fuel cells as
a viable and economical power supply,'' the CRRA proposal states. ``The
average installed cost for all 12 units in this 26-MW installation is
approximately $4,150 per kilowatt.'' Connecticut's $15-million Clean Energy
Fund, which invests in renewable technologies, previously turned down the
proposed project, Sosland said.

The CRRA will present its proposal to the DPUC during hearings on funding for
conservation programs. The DPUC is set to make a final decision on the
``Conservation and Load Management Programs and Budget for 2001'' by June 6.


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042213.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  64.68 / Final:  64.26)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I'm having trouble getting off.  What time is the flight out on the 29th -
that's my trouble day, the latter the better so I can be here in the morining.

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 11/30/2000 08:52:48 AM
To: "'chris.germany@enron.com'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Good morning, Chris.

The hotel in NYC is available.? I'll look into alternate departure times on
Jan 2 and let you know what I find.? Please check and see if you can get the
time off.? I won't book anything yet.

Have a good day.??? ii


Doug:
To confirm the pricing of the LNG dela::

I can show a $3.01 bid for the Nymex portion of 160,000 mmbtu/day for the
time period Jan 2003-Dec 2014.  The bid on Henry Hub basis for same time
period is -$.0025 resulting in fix price of $3.0075; the bid on Sonat basis
is -$.0175 translating into a bid of $2.9925.

Notional volume = 70,128 contracts.
PV volume = 37,658 contracts.
Exposure per $.01 move = $3,760,000

John


Ed & Lauri,

Attached is a very rough draft of the GTC for HPL's Interruptible Intrastate
Transportation service transacted via Enron On-Line.  Gerald is out of the
office this week (Cabo San Lucas, no less) but we wanted to get a rough draft
to you so you could see the format and structure of the GTC.  We'd like to
sit down sometime next week with the two of you and David Forester to flush
out the process some more.  For several provisions we'll need to determine
exactly how the transaction will take place on Enron On-line before we can
appropriately draft such provisions and determine what terminology to use.

Note: The 311 GTC is exactly the same as the Intrastate except of course for
section 2 - Regulation.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Paul,

Thanks for your concerns.  Yes, things are ambling along.  A lot depends on the Government's (MSEB, State & Central) willingness to find a solution that is acceptable to us and helps in project completion.  We are scheduled to meet the Renegotiating Committee on May 23 for the second time.  And, we have to see what do the Lenders decide - whether they resume funding (and, if so, under what conditions).  Let us hope for the best.

In the present circumstances, it may not be advisable to have the OLNG team visiting site.  With regards to the meeting in Houston, do you have an idea about what they want to discuss?  We could then decide about the meeting after talking to Clay & Neil.

I am attaching herewith the electronic form of DPC's logo.

Its fine with me if you call me anytime until 12 noon Houston time.

Regards,
Shubh

From:	Paul YBarbo/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/16/2001 04:23 PM CDT
To:	Shubh Shrivastava/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:	Clay Harris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:	Oman LNG Requests

Shubh,

How are you managing these days? I'm still hoping for a positive outcome from the current dialogues. However, I've been reading the Indian press and they are rather depressing. I hope that you are not overworked and overstressed.

Oman LNG wants to have a meeting in Houston in early June. They are also still asking about the possibility of a site visit at DPC. I want to talk to Clay Harris and get his view on the desirability of such meetings. How do you feel about meeting with DPC's principal LNG supplier. I would not know what to tell them at this point. A site visit would be awkward at this time.

Also, Oman LNG has requested a DPC logo in electronic file form. Can you provide it to me?

When would be a good time for me to call on Thursday?

Good Luck,

Paul


did you get her to sign a service contract?  i won about $700


Matthew, Janet and I are going to come your way before March 12th.  I'll give
you a call to discuss further.

Couple of points, I would hope you would share with your group on Monday:

 - the European retail business is an important and strategic focus for Enron
and EES;
 - it encompases a material part of EES's and Enron Europes margin plan for
2001 - so execution and most probably over performance is key in 2001;
 - it was birthplace of one of the key EES distribution platforms that needs
to be migrated to North America - Enron Direct and the ITOL structure (for
the large industrial customer);
 - the European business IS one of the largest growth opportunities going
forward for EES and EES management will recognize, resource and reward that
effort;
 - I am very involved in business strategy, execution and deals;
 - I believe in open communication, performance and high performance teams -
no bullshit politics;
 - I recognize and reward performance, thinking, execution and leadership;
 - I flourish in a culture of ideas, fast action and success;
 - and I will be visiting London to meet everyone probably late February
early March.

PS - I am already a citizen of the Commonwealth.

Talk to you soon!!

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
06:27 PM ---------------------------

Matthew Scrimshaw
02/09/2001 10:47 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EES Europe - Outsourcing Reorganisation

FYI, I'm planning to visit Houston w/c 12th March.  If you and Janet get here
first I'll push that trip back a month or two.

David W Delainey
09/02/2001 15:53
To: Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EES Europe - Outsourcing Reorganisation

ok, let me put something together on e-mail over the next day or so -
otherwise we will plan to be in Europe over the next 4 weeks or so.

regards
delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
09:51 AM ---------------------------

Matthew Scrimshaw
02/09/2001 09:22 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EES Europe - Outsourcing Reorganisation

Dave,

It would be really great for you to do that.  Unfortunately we start at
10.30am UK / 4.30am US time (the only slot we could get for the Auditorium).
It won't be as cool as a video link up, but if you give me a text message
addressed to all European staff, I'll read it out.

I'll get the senior guys together on Monday for the weekly EES 2.30pm UK /
8.30am US video conference call so you and Janet can at least speak to them.

Let's get you and Janet over to Europe to meet and greet the troops in person
later in the year when you guys realise what you have taken on!

Matthew

David W Delainey
09/02/2001 15:03
To: Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EES Europe - Outsourcing Reorganisation

Matthew, would your Monday meeting be a good time (if the time change works)
for me to introduce myself and say a few words via video conference or the
like to your organization?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Matthew Scrimshaw
02/09/2001 03:04 AM
To: Enron London EES Group
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EES Europe - Outsourcing Reorganisation

Introduction

EES has been operating in Europe since late 1999 and in that time a lot of
progress has been made.  The teams who have worked on Outsourcing in Europe
have learnt a tremendous amount over the last year.  We now have a much
clearer idea of what should work today in the different jurisdictions that
comprise Europe and those elements of our offering with which customers are
most comfortable.

The phenomenally strong financial performance in 2000 of Enron Direct and
ETOL graphically demonstrate the future potential in Europe for a broad
retail energy business.  With Enron's retail energy presence in Europe firmly
established, we are restructuring our Outsourcing product offering and the
organisation to develop and deliver it, so that we broaden our activities and
successfully grow our earnings in line with shareholder expectations.

We now have a renewed focus in 2001.  The emphasis will be to work on only
the largest deals (by energy commodity spend) in those markets where we
already have a robust wholesale energy business and there is regulated and
economic third party access to retail power distribution systems.  The main
thrust of our offering will be commodity and Demand Side Management (DSM)
projects and our associated price risk management capabilities.  Commodity is
Enron's core competence and one where Enron should be in a position to
generate sizeable gross margin at closure.  DSM projects are also important
as they will deliver gross margin and are what differentiate us from the
commodity competition.  We will be focussing on shorter project lead times at
the front of a deal to ensure that we get to closure promptly - we need to
see 80% of the value in 20% of the time.  Whilst we retain an understanding
of O&M, this will not form part of our core offering and we will only
consider involvement in an O&M capacity on attractive margin transactions
where it is essential to the customer.  As the business develops it is likely
that, to some extent, we will build the necessary O&M delivery capability to
enhance the product offering in the future.

In those markets where we have limited wholesale capability or the third
party access to power distribution systems is not feasible in a retail
context, we will build and develop Utility Representation Services (URS) in
conjunction with a DSM project offering.  This knowledge based business will
allow us to develop retail customer networks in advance of economic system
access and also provide valuable market information back to the wholesale
business.  URS is ERPAG's core business and gives us a tremendous platform to
create a pan European URS competence.

Expertise in Supply Side Management has increasingly become an issue for the
origination team in EES Europe as we have begun to get into material deal
development.  Whilst it is vital that we remain totally coordinated with the
wholesale business for price risk management services, there will be a
renewed emphasis within EES Europe to develop those commodity skills that do
not reside in the wholesale business to allow us to promptly and effectively
price and structure retail commodity transactions to the delivery point.

Given the renewed focus outlined above, we have taken the opportunity to
streamline the Account Delivery and Management team, typically redeploying
staff where they can immediately support the development of new business for
EES Europe.  Effective Account Management remains a key capability for EES
and as we close deals with customers we will review our staffing need in this
area.

Organisation

After eighteen months working on establishing the outsourcing business in
Europe, Ron Bertasi has decided to transition back to the US during the first
half of 2001.  In the short term he will complete the Trillium property deal
and ensure that the energy and property deals are both successfully
launched.  I would like to take this opportunity to thank Ron, on behalf of
everyone in Europe, for all his hard work over the last eighteen months in
establishing the European Outsourcing business and in particular his
leadership on the Trillium deal which represents a substantial landmark for
the business.

Stuart Rexrode is now head of European Energy Services Outsourcing.  Stuart
will continue in a customer facing capacity as a lead originator, whilst
ensuring that all of the dimensions that comprise the Outsourcing team remain
appropriately focussed.  Bob Manasse will head up the origination team and
ensure that the deal pipeline remains full of substantial good quality
prospects.

Hala Tayyarah has been promoted to Manager within the Commodity team and will
provide commodity pricing support to the origination team.  Hala will report
to Peter Redpath until such time as a head of Supply Side Management is
appointed.

Reporting to Peter Redpath, Peter Ramgolam will lead a new activity,
Transaction Economics, supporting Origination by developing cashflow models
to determine deal economics, identify improvements to structures to optimise
value and capture transactions for risk management purposes.

Also reporting to Peter Redpath, John Parker will lead the implementation of
a Position Management activity.

The attached organisation charts show these changes in the revised structure
of EES Europe which is effective immediately.  Whilst these charts are
relatively self explanatory for the levels shown, there will be detailed
discussions over the next day or so to explain what the changes mean for
individuals.  Where boxes are labelled TBA, we hope to make appointments in
the near future.

At 10.30am on Monday 12th February we shall be holding a one hour EES-Europe
all employee meeting in the Auditorium in place of the usual weekly staff
meeting.  At this session we will talk about the 2001 Earnings Plan and
provide clarity on the deal process for Outsourcing and the reasoning behind
it.  Also, it will be an opportunity for you to raise any questions you may
have.  I look forward to seeing you there.

Matthew


Diana/Cara,

Attached is a letter from Mark Hackey, which I assume you have already read.  Do you have any issues related to this document that I need to address with anyone on the WSCC OC or WMIC?

Generally the letter seems pretty straight forward, it seems too bad that they hedge, even the Dec 11 implementation date.  Please let me know if there is anything we need to address in this letter,

Thanks,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maiser@wscc.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Maiser+40wscc+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of "Hackney, Mark W(Z39911)" <Mark.Hackney@aps.com>
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Western Market Interface Committee
Subject:	Clarification Letter

Please read attached letter:

 <<Clarifying Letter.doc>>
Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com
_________________________________________________________________
Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey

 - Clarifying Letter.doc


Susan,
Continental     #531 leaving Tuesday, Aug 14 at 9:20 to San Fran at 11:15
Korean Air      #24 leaving San Fran at 1:00 and arriving in Korea at 4:50pm on Wednesday, Aug 15
That's outbound for you.  I think they made the reservation wrong on the return, I'll have to go back today and check it out.
-Chris

Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messengerhttp://phonecard.yahoo.com/


Congratulations on taking over the top spot!  And you said these guys would
be ok this year - your smoking crack again aren't you?  Looks like you guys
could be Final Four bound in the RCA Dome in Hoosier Land.  Good Luck
Ben


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           07/24/2000 10:43 AM

To: swantita_99@yahoo.com
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Land Option Agreement/VEPCO

Hi Heather,

We can discuss these comments, if you want, or just incorporate them.
Electricities shouldn't mind.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 10:42
AM ---------------------------

Herman Manis
07/24/2000 10:40 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Land Option Agreement/VEPCO

see comments in brackets and caps.

To: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Land Option Agreement/VEPCO

FYI.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/24/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll@ECT
07/21/2000 03:55 PM
To: kraber@electricities.org, mscolo@poynerspruill.com
cc: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey M Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Land Option Agreement

Gentlemen:

Attached below please find what we hope to be the final option agreement.
All the changes should have been made.  I've blacklined the comments from Ken
from this morning.

Ken, if this is acceptable, please call me and we will sned an executed
document to you.

Regards,

Heather


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041015.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  24.00 / Final:  23.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


Hey Dexter,

Here are your numbers!  Have a great weekend!


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 03:01
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                12/15/2000 10:48 AM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Nature at it;s best

 - catching snowflakes.jpg


Kay,

I told Fred I would look at this tomorrow morning and see if I could made the
changes for you.

K-

Kay Mann
01/02/2001 04:53 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Draft CA - NRG Development Co.

fyi.  I haven't checked yet.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/02/2001 04:52
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           01/02/2001 04:43 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Draft CA - NRG Development Co.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 04:40
PM ---------------------------

"Magie, Scott" <Scott.Magie@nrgenergy.com> on 01/02/2001 04:35:41 PM
To: "'Fred.Mitro@enron.com'" <Fred.Mitro@enron.com>
cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Chris.Booth@enron.com

Subject: RE: Draft CA - NRG Development Co.

Take a look at the redlined changes.  SCOTT

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred.Mitro@enron.com [mailto:Fred.Mitro@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 3:37 PM
To: scott.magie@nrgenergy.com
Cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Chris.Booth@enron.com
Subject: Draft CA - NRG Development Co.

Scott:

Please find attached a draft CA between Enron North America and NRG
Development Co., Inc. per our discussions on power plant project
opportunities.

Please review and provide me with your comments/proposed changes.  If this
form is acceptable, please have it signed by an appropriate representative
of NRG Development Co., Inc. and fax to me at (713) 646-3037.  I will then
forward you two signed originals for NRG's execution.

If you have any questions or wish to discuss, please contact me at (713)
853-5406.  I will be out of the office next week but can be reached by cell
phone at (713) 412-4612.  Please leave a voice message on my cell phone and
I will respond as soon as possible.

Best wishes for a safe and happy holiday season.

Regards,
Fred Mitro

(See attached file: NRGdevelopment CA 122200DOC.DOC)

 - NRGdevelopment CA 122200DOC.DOC


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 9;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	ENA Staff Mtg. EB32c2

Date:		2/5/2001
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description: